HomeMy WebLinkAboutRouge Park Alliance 2012 ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE MINUTES
1111111110- MEETING #2/12 - APRIL 20, 2012
Rouge I: r�. .
The Rouge Park Alliance met in the Main Boardroom of the Toronto Zoo. Alan Wells, Chair,welcomed everyone and
called the meeting to order at 9:10 a.m.
PRESENT
Members: Alternates:
Alan Wells,Chair Brian Denney,TRCA
Hon. Pauline Browes,Waterfront Regeneration Trust Corp. Lilli Duoba,Town of Markham
Hon. Michael Chong, MP,Government of Canada Debbie Pella Keen, Province of Ontario
Markham Deputy Mayor Jack Heath, Region of York Dr. Bill Rapley,Toronto Zoo
Regional Councillor Peter Rodrigues, Region of Durham Jim Robb,Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Councillor Clyde Smith,Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Carolyn Woodland,TRCA
ABSENT
Members: Alternates:
Councillor Paul Ainslie,City of Toronto Jim Baird,Town of Markham
Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker,City of Toronto Ian Buchanan, Region of York
Andre Flys,Save the Rouge Valley System Inc. Councillor Colin Campbell,Town of Markham
Dr. Helena Jaczek, MPP, Province of Ontario Mayor Wayne Emmerson,Town of Wh itch urch-Stouffvilie
Councillor Logan Kanapathi,Town of Markham Adele Freeman,TRCA
Councillor Castro Liu,Town of Richmond Hill Mark Graham,Save the Rouge Valley System Inc.
Gerri Lynn O'Connor,TRCA Sue Gunton,Toronto Zoo
Mayor David Ryan,City of Pickering Tom Melymuk,City of Pickering
John Tracogna,Toronto Zoo Roger Saunders, Region of Durham
Tracey Steele,Town of Richmond Hill
Staff: Staff(Continued...)
Mike Bender,Acting General Manager Doreen McCarty,Administrative Coordinator
Lorraine Chung, Field Technician Sheryl Santos,Stewardship Coordinator
Michelle Holmes, Manager,Visitor Experience Diana Smyth,Trail Coordinator
Vicki MacDonald, Biologist
Observers: Observers(Continued...)
Mike Adler,Toronto Community News/Metroland Sheila Lathe, Resident
Cat Beattie, Rouge Watch Evelyn Lurz, Friends of the Rouge Watershed
Andrew Campbell, Parks Canada Gord MacPherson,TRCA
Sue Davey,Assistant To Hon. Michael Chong Brett Marsh,The Dog Pad
Jim Dillane,Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Andy McKinnon, Rouge Watch
Catherine Grenier, Parks Canada Beth Williston,Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Kiruthiha Kulendiren, David Suzuki Foundation
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 2 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
CHAIR'S REMARKS
Alan Wells, Chair,welcomed and thanked everyone for coming. The Chair showed a video with The Hon.
Michael Chong speaking in the House of Commons to recognize the hard work and dedication of the Rouge
Park Alliance,and to highlight their contribution to the recent 2012 budget announcement,which stated that
the Government will take action to create Canada's first national near-urban park in the Rouge Valley. The
Chair also acknowledged the presence of Lewis Yeager, Rouge Park General Manager,at the Alliance meeting.
MINUTES FROM MEETING #1/12, February 10, 2012
MOTION: Moved by: Peter Rodrigues
Res.#13/12 Seconded by: Brian Denney
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve the minutes of Meeting #1/12 held on February 10,2012.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
None
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
None
The Chair requested that two handouts be added to the list of correspondence (agenda item #10) as follows:
1. Correspondence 10.4: Letter dated April 2,2012 to Chair Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance,from The Hon.
Michael Chong, MP,re: March 29, 2012 Budget Announcement- Reconfirmed Commitment of the
Government of Canada to Establish a National Urban Park in the Rouge Valley.
2. Correspondence 10.5: Email dated April 16, 2012 to Alan Wells from Andy McKinnon,re: Items Regarding
the Rouge Park Trails Master Plan (agenda item #2),and Restoration Areas (agenda item #6).
MOTION: Moved by: Jim Robb
Res.#14/12 Seconded by: Peter Rodrigues
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance bring forward Correspondence 10.4 for discussion.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
The Hon. Michael Chong said the Government of Canada is committed to the establishment of a new national
urban park in the Rouge Valley. He said that the initiative is proceeding as planned,that funding will be
included in subsequent budgets to facilitate the process,and that the new Rouge National Urban Park will be
run by Parks Canada.
MOTION: Moved by: Clyde Smith
Res.#15/12 Seconded by: Brian Denney
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive Correspondence 10.4.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 3 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
PRESENTATIONS/DELEGATIONS
Andrew Campbell and Catherine Grenier, Parks Canada
Mr. Campbell presented an overview of the Rouge National Urban Park initiative,and the Rouge National
Urban Park Establishment Process. The process involves various ongoing engagement efforts: consultations
with a broad range of partners,stakeholders, First Nations communities and youth groups; creation of the
Landholders Table to discuss and subsequently make a recommendation on park boundaries and land
transfer processes (Statement of Intent, Multi-Party Agreement on Land Transfer);creation of a national urban
park concept (i.e. how the park will be established, protected and managed,governance provisions,
description of the study area,transition measures,vision of a people's park,etc.);and next steps (followup
with partners,stakeholders and First Nations group, more public consultations,recommendation to the
government on legislative process, interim management direction, park establishment,etc.). Mr. Campbell
also said that Parks Canada does not have legal authority to expropriate land.
MOTION: Moved by: Brian Denney
Res.#16/12 Seconded by: Jim Robb
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the presentation by Parks Canada.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
1. TRCA Report -"Statement of Intent-Towards Cooperation and Collaboration in
The Establishment of a National Urban Park in the Rouge Valley" (Res.#A22/12)
KEY ISSUE
Provide the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) report regarding the"Statement of Intent-
Towards Cooperation and Collaboration in the Establishment of a National Urban Park in the Rouge Valley".
MOTION: Moved by: Clyde Smith
Res.#17/12 Seconded by: Jack Heath
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the TRCA report for information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
See attached report.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 4 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
ATTACHMENT
PIES.#A22Z1 2 ® ROUGE NATIONAL URBAN PARK
Parks Canada Statement of Intentions. Ratification of a Statement of
Intent with Parks Canada to work towards a recommendation on the park
boundaries and to take the necessary steps to establish the Rouge
National Urban Park.
Moved by; Chin Lee
Seconded by, Colleen Jordan
THAT the "'Statement of Intent-Towards Cooperation and Collaboration in the
Establishment of a National Urban Park in the Rouge Valley" be endorsed;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) request direction from the
Ministry of Infrastructure regarding the disposition of provincial lands conveyed to TRCA
in title or by management agreement for Rouge Park purposes;
THAT'TRCA express Its thanks to Minister Peter, Kent for the support of the Government
of Canada to create the National Urban Park;
THAT TRCA express its thanks to Mr. Alan Welts, Chair of the Rouge Park Alliance for his
leadership In pursuit of:the resolution of the governance and funding solutions for the
Rouge Park;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA continue,to offer its assistance to Parks Canada regarding
the transition period and provision of other services to Parks Canada after the National
Urban Park Is established.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authoruty Meeting #2110, held on March 26, 2010, Resolution #A33/10 was approved. The
clauses of the resolution are repeated below, along with a brief summary of progress on each
respective component of the resolution. Members of the Authority may wish to look at the full
report on true'web site for a more detailed background of the events leading Up to the request
to the federal government.
THAT the Chair and Members of the Rouge Park Alliance be advised that Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority(TRCA) supports the following in response to the
recommendations of the "Governance, Organization and Finance Review of Rouge Park
Alliance, February 2010":
• the creation of a Rouge Federal Park on the lands shown as areas 1, 2 and 3 on
Schedule A attached,-
• the development of the terms of a "Founding Deal" including, but not limited to the
elements of such a deal as shown in Schedule B attached;
• discussions wtih the Alliance to engage the federal and provincial governments in the
creation of the proposed federal park governance structure and creation of a joint
interpretiveleducational centre for Rouge Park;
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 5 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
In June 2011, [he Speech from the Thirone set the&ection for the Government of Canada to
establish a national urban park in the Rouge Valley, Other annoUncements by Minister Kent,
combined with initiatives by Parks Canada to host a visioning session and lead the preparation
of the Statement of Ilitent, confirm,that the nationat urban park is beginnOg to take shape. It is
anticipated that the federal budget to be released on March 29, 2012 will contain provisions that
will advance the process to create the national urban park. By requesting the endorsement of
the Statement of Intent by the public agencies that own the land comprising the existing park,
Parks Canada is seeking to ensure that the lands reqUired for the park will be availlable for
transfer at an appropriate time in the future.
THAT TRCA advise the Rouge Park Alliance that TRCA is prepared to serve as the
"Interim Transition Entity", as proposed in the Dernents of a For Deall-
It willi take some years to create the nafionaV urban park including the firne required to prepare
and authorize a specific Act. Parks Canada may need somie assistance during that period to
continue planning, development , programming and Ilease management within the park.TRCA
has expressed an interest in prov6ng such assistance provided that cost recovery can be
achieved, it is,anticipated that these drscussions can be advanced after the federal budget has
been released. Given that the Province of Ontario has announced ifs decision to end
involvement un the Rouge Park Alliance at tl,-ie end of Jull,y 2012, other provisions for the
management, coordination and prjoirization of acti0fies in the park will need to be made,
THAT staff, in conjunction with the Chair of the Roage Park Alliance, continve to pursue
an appropriate lorn)of tenure in the ren7aming prow nd I a/lands that have been identified'
as part of the Rouge,Park;
In the fall of 2011, the P'rovince of Ontario confirmed its intention to transfer the east Markham
lands to TRCA, , under a management agreement, thereby confirming that these lands will also
be available for iriclusion within the national urban park. Assorne of the lands remain in the title
of the Province of Ontario,, and many of the lands in TRCA"s title came from the province, with a
condition that they be held for Rouge Park purposes, the Province of Ontairlo is a major
participant in the ongoing discussions with Parks Canada and will need to give TRCA
inStrLJCti011S on the process TRCA is to follow in rnaking the lands available to Parks Canada.
THAT, if reguested by the City of Toronto, staff be directed to explore the feasibility of
TRCA assurning the operation of the Glen Rouge C'ampgroundl
TRCA assumed management of the campground at the beginning of the 2011 season and it
,operated SUCCeSSfUlly. PreWrnabty,TRCA wilil continue to operate the campground for the 2012
season and staff is preparing to do,so.
THAT staff be,directed to pursue ftjndir7q for the capital develioptnent of elements of the
Park, as approved by the Rouge Park Alliance and the respective municipalities, through
TRCA's budget process and other funding opportunities,'
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 6 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
Substantial additional investment was secured through York Region as part of the
environmental enhancements required as a condition of approval for the south-east collector
for the York Durham sewer expansion project. This funding has enabled trail:, bridge and habitat
projects. It is anticipated that about$3.5 million will be available from the Region of York over 3
years.
THAT staff be directed to update the existing Mernorandurn of Understaoding betweerr
the Ministry of Natural Resources (MAIR), Rouge Park Alliance and I'R(,*A to provide tot,
the continued land assembly, planning, development and operation of the P,,;irk, while the
negotiations with the governments continue,
Given the decision by the Province of Ontario, as noted above, to withdraw frorn 'the Alliance as
of July 31,2012, the MOU will be terminated.TRCA will now be dealing directly with Parks
Canada and the other participants in the"Landholders Table" , in an effort to coordinate
and implernentation priorities while the development of the national Urban park
progresses. TRCA staff will endeavour to keep development of the park progressing, and
manage the various leases in the park,while the negotiations for the national urban park
continue,
AN[)FURTHER 7'HAT staff be directed to continuo to oarticipate in discussions with the
Chair of the Rouge Park Alliance and represer)tafives of the 1`own of Markham to rosf>ond
to the report of the Rouge Park,Itrroleirientation 77tmsk Force, and in particular to develoj,') a
strategy for the protection and restoratior),of heritage strixtures within the Park,
Protectior') of heritage structures withinfl'ie park Gonfinues to be a challenge and will be tl-w
suf.)jec[of further negotiations aniong the parties. Ilia the interi mm, "I'lPICA seeks to secure and
rnaintain important StI'LICtures within the limits of available, fUnding. fl"ie Town of Markharn has
olte red sorne financial support for maintenance of two critical Sti'Llcti.rres,
RATIONALE
'rhe request by Parks Canada for execution of the Statement of intent is an encouraging step
forward in the creation of the Rouge National Urban Park. Parks Canada needs to know that the
various owners of Public lands that comprise the park are prepared to rnake the lands available,
Parks Canada is well aware that there are r-nany issues to be resolved, and questions to be
answered, before the aCtUal conveyance of lands can take place. Parks Canada has provide(]
an overview of the process to be followed (Attachment 2), and has alrNWy begun to
demonstrate its cornmitment to an inclusive process of consultaborl.
Some of the major questions from TRCA's perspective are as follows:!
0 Wfiat are the exact bOUridaries of the park?
o What is the plan for the park?
0 What is the process for,cornmunity involvement in planning, implementation and operation?
# What, if any, is the ongoirig role of'1"RCA within the Park,on behalf of Parks Canadia'?
0 1-low will the Park interface with TRCA's other policy and program interests within the Rouge
Watershed?
* What is Vie investment that the federal government intends to bring to the Park in terms of
additional lands, capital and operating funding allocations?
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 7 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
• How will TRCA's many existing tenants be engaged and Supported through the process of
development of the park?
• How will agriculture be encouraged to continue in the park and what forms will it take?
• How will the deterioration of heritage structures in the park be reversed?
• How will the momentum of park development and programming be maintained during the
process of development of the new Act and establishment of Parks Canada staffing within
the park?
• What are the expectations, if any, for ongoing financial contributions by the province of
Ontario, the MUnicipalifies, the TRCA and other participants who have brought the park to
the present situation?
• What impact will there be on TRCA's existing staff resources, both directly in the planning
and programming of the park, and indirectly in many of the park infrastructure development
and regeneration activities?
• WHI there be private fundraising objectives that relight compete with the TRCA's " Living City
Foundation"?
• What will be the role of the Toronto Zoo as a major attraction adjacent to the Park? (Parks
Canada has advised that there will be bilateral discussions with the City of Toronto and
Toronto Zoo).
• How will TRCA's Port Union waterfront project, scheduled for completion later this year,
serve as one of the""front doors"to the park and what are the implications for ownership and
maintenance resp,o,nisiblity?
• How will file recently completed trails master plan be incorporated into the ongoing parks
planning process and similarly, what will be the process to integrate the original plan for
the Rouge Park, south of Stee es, the RoL,qe North Management Plan,the Bob Hunter
Memorial Park Plan and the plan for the East Mar harp lands into a consolidated plan for
the national urban park?
• As the existing Rouge, Park All"ance winds down at the end of July, 2012, what type of
transitional governance,structure will be required, it any, and what might the role of"rRCA
be as the host for such: a strUCtUre?
Preliminary discussions with Parks Canada on these and many other questions and issues
have begun, but in the absence of a further direction and budget allocations to Parks Canada, it
is not possibie to resolve them at this time. Optimistically, the federal budget schedUled for
delivery on March 29,2012, MI provide more direction,
Report prepared by: Brian Denney, 416®667- 29, O
Emails: bdenney@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Brian Denney, 416-667-6290
Emalls., bdenney@trca.on.ca
Date; January 24, 2012
AttachmenM 2
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 8 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
Attachment 1
8latemen L2LL ntg_nt
Towards Cooperation and Collaboration iin the Establishment of a NationaI Urban Paiirk iin
the Rouge Valley
I. Purpose
1,1 'T lie pwpose of this Stafetnent tV Intent is to expre .,cornmttmer�t by the Participtints, to
work together towalrdt-i a on the park boundanes and to take the
nece,mSary sterr,thal w0tlki be requimtl to establish RtA,kle W414,mrnM Urbw Park,sutqed,to
the appriovals I'mr,"ss p &ic Po e6ch
2. Participants
of Canada(Fepram serAed by the IPaarfra Canada Agf.,mcy)
• Provinq.,,G,, c')f Ontanc)(werweslente(!by thf,,-, Nfinistry ofinfrastrudure)
fty of Tor cm Ito
11-wi IRegjonaf PluimcgAldy of York
The Regm4 RAvvetpality of Durham
aw Tuuift Regic'm 0,,,xiserva[ion Aufliarity
2 1 The PaMctpants mached a sliared tirwdewstan(hng and vnsh to lex1mess then, lii,uluM
cowinidnw,nl iinb in'twittons as 1,.veseirO.ed in the,folixmvig document,
3. I Background
31 The federal,pi-ovmiciaV and municiirkzjf arrodved and the J"(Wp,-Ajto Regim
Conservatio,ri AutlKwfty have supfx0iml Rouge Park arild the Rouge F"Fulk Affonce since its
niception m I 9W and ha�,re provoled, ftrrancia�resoiarc>�s,an mcognition of tl-w-,h Iwnpoilyant,
re,souirces as,,,,Axaated Mh the Rouge Vdltey, US uru'qquie fts ix,.h histoncand
ruftural rxat rmrfm aimrcmaa wild the silqtnifwcan(bmselits it provdes to th,e vilalifies of
12 The,ROLIC gcwe'nrne Rit end
,)L�Park Allmmc�,.4 is a wyhintarV parlmn-shtp Df vanou's Wvelrn of r
agent, ,is whi-m3e nmwdiale is lc,m oversf.*?�and cm -f,"finate the umpk,--mientation of the R(xige
P�afk h1iianagemewd F4ains and be w w1vocale firm the prolecbm,einhancernent, and
rwsftorsOon ol ffie Fat4,iuge F�threr watershrA.
3,3 In 20 10,the Rouge Park Affiarvre I the,Rd�)uga Parik be c
grar4ed (ederat
de,5,ignabovi to contributp,to better menagement of the park 4nds arlcl rpsotim*s and
foovide�,inhanccxl, arcip'ssibie vi-vtov expenierices,and Warning opgorhawfiles to the irrmore
than seven miffian rrriskJ(.,,mts of tl)*,,y Gmatef Torofft Areai, wsilcv-,to ffsc�m regon,,as waft as
all Canadlans, Pn 20,10, each ofthip,tnumbei nr+utaani7affona of 1he Rckuqp.Park Affiance
es'dnrsed Hhe recvimix.mridation tc)seek,fpderW desuqnabon li,,)r Rouge PaiX-
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 9 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
3,A The June 2011 Speech from the'rhrorm sol,the directicm for tho (,;,ovemm(,)nt of Canada to
work with the provincral and rnunictpaf gu.'iverrvrvenfs, At)origrmr padners, and conirnundy
Stak&401MTS towar d,. ostaNvzJ)j,nq a rmficunW urbar"r park ir,r 1he Rouge VaHey'
3.":r Mi January 20,12, Fhe F'rovince of Ontano I-iias expreased v1s dezirre to effect an oirdedy
hansitk,.'mi of trum v.porahon,,s, and managernent of RutxJe, Flark, "i
of the effot to estabd fish Rouge Nationed lJrbari!Palk
36 Rot,pe Pairk is kicaled in d'in urban setfing mil reqmrf,z,&flexuhfity to Lie restxinsive and
provide fafitucle to acconirrtod,,a�te the relafionsfflj:)to adjacenI or' an lartc,11, uso.'s and
jpopWafion aind m0asb"vchme ried,,jwremenfs.
37 Parlicipants share an Oterest in advandng as Rouge Naban,M Wbarr Park arui ate
committed to worka ig together and mth Aboriginar 1,mrtner's,and commurI4,stakeholders
through a comultalive and collaboraltve process to establish Rourge NafionM Urban Park
under the stewards,Np i.Af Parks Canada
4, Scope of Cooperation
gip, Parh(ipmi i1s,a y'ee to work coopenatrvOy to adciress issues of mulual intof esl, as mrifirent,
bE00W, and offiler reNted rirmtters that rnay ernerge lhrotMh Me Tntik establishrrient process-
* Identification oif lar'Ws reco,rnn'iended to be included in or exchidecIr fr rn, Rouge
NahonW Urban Park,
* Rouge National Urban Park Cloncept�
* Ii ecommend processes arid condittons of any Iland transfer to Parks Canadki subi(PT'1
to, obtmnWq add necesstmy approvWs:
fraarhsrtteaa measmraah as identihed furtherrra sedxm"i fi;
ReWfinwihlj)to adjaceW Iiind uses,(mchnimg tho Toronto?oo and Reare (4oad
Landfll)and agricuhurOhl uses
diodes and reemp'Mion of the Partwirmnts uarlei the new govmlaincP mtxlpjd,i1nd
Infrastructure and&.i future managernent.
5. Pretftfnary park concept
51 A riationad urban park rs as new conoe(A, vvli�ch requluos mi vnnovafive, conservation and
mana,gcorient appronch[riot is reflechve of fts,near-urban conlext arxf provides ffiia,,fiewoihty
to manage a workiag Ican,df-,xOPEa. I 1'1sS 001h(M41A mH be de,K,,Moped and guided by
consuftabons with a broad riange,(0,pidiftnel s and stakeholdef's, OdWfiflfj the PadiMPFIrItS,
5,,2 Ahgr uad mth IPaar ks Carvvla's mandratel, t1w n0orml u.m'bart park corucept wrH Oclutfe
consmVation,off natural and cuQul al heritap`)e resources, optjortunrhe'r'_"for maching arid
iracreas4ig appreciafion wriongst our urban popufabi'm, a wide reinge,of visotor experience
posmll-,Wdres and thra,Otk
grahon arid pu,�,rnohon of SLJStMnaNe agrculture,
513 BOUndades,M1 be defined based a:)rt an EmIreaAneint Mh 1he Partdc pkmts, To quidethe work
and facifitate Wentificatr(m"r (.A iconsiudeujbons and issues by the Participants, Parks�Canada
has presprited as rnap of the Study Area(Annex,1) 1hat ms undof consideraborl for a pryteslfiM
nabonai utbart park
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 10 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
6. Establishment Process
61, A 1,andWders Table as created rn FaH 2()11 by Park Canada to bring the, F%rficsparvts
together to =e tan an agreenient On park Mwirl,danps, flands To he, mc;luded or exclude,01
,1Mdt,h0 Sh"ate,gleS aTid processes for the transrer,of Wids to flarks Canada subject to
obtaliliing the rjCjcecsarV approvWs by each PWivimint
6,2, ln ixara#el to this prac*ss- Pttirks Canada is Msai enga,g4iig a broad gaxq)�;.if partnersand
M wh 4 ickldo,as the Parfi6pants,, t(.,t ce,,)ns�,O c,,,tn v�,sion ,,,,wd concep'l tov the
parilk A�,,peray-m-its that wO (,.-,ome out oft'he I table wifi be shar(,-W for snput as
pail i,,:4 a twoader consultation proc;Q's"s("))n ll'W,-est'ablishirnp.,ni otRwgR Niaticrol Urban
F-14ark-
63 Tfue I widbolders Table witt diavelop an ap;,,,)roach to coordinate vahowi,due diligence
processes and the Crown's dUty of consuftatwprr,,, lf any, and aco-,,uiTin,*dabon, 1
appropriate
6 4, Transih(,a,n rneastin-.a,s wi[) be devek)ppd,Io aflow fo lnterim governance of Me park r,Juring
the estaWhiiiiMt jA0,C;EAr,,s and t.,n)IJI as peanr�,,Jnent gavernance sln,Wft"'PiS created and the
Wids have been dW)l transferred,to the managing aoth('oity Intedin Managertic--,writ
GuOeHrw; ad M also be devi-Aopedto guidip nwinagetnent until as (Jovern4i,g Fran"iework is
adapff-M, VWes a-rt`F)artwipants as Ixorl of the transMon pi,ocer.,isas weli as part of the
pefn.lanent goven'tance rnodO for the national Lirban park wR11 be ch-termined.
7. Timing
7.1. Padlcpants inAe,'i'id to cork, to,waWs as tand tjar*fer al,
.1'req,4111(int falkywrig pre�,,ojtahon by the
I
Federal a trnahonal urban park (-A)noept and wniArnkation of funding: and
prop,*ed boundanos, to t1rie safisfactiort of the pa rIkes to the al'..'treement
7,2, P,,,,ii licpants wffl or towwds a targot dand transfaw agrpQinp,,n(in place by Fall 2G"1'1.2.
S. Legal Effect
T[0s, of fi'a Natpt * avi expression olf the muh.tap IWenljons of thp Panwipants and riot
i,EqaHy bnJingi ori then-i,
91, Appendices
I map oftrif.stia4.1y Area undei",considerraflon by PlEirks C"anada
2 Nilwribers(of the Landholders Table
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 11 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
Annex 1 Ludy Area under consider ation b'y Parks Casa
+,Aoak RVd�'�+G.r,,�mrVr�
a,
°e o,°°o a, P o V: ,W
t / �
4 N tt f
w .w �
s 7 vnwirS'�'P
,f
=, � l !""gyp "�A '�. �4. •�_ � �
1
I
9uvw� y pvp w aam�W Poa���mud.aw�u..J �
a�v 'a I°nnpv�
NoW,TN% p is a Study�ma onj Th Wnds shown are curer My under mWo fir pomilbW ur clussoM Cwt pans MOD
rudwW p. bw wk Ta'b amp Ins nM p4a irk kvvindawi ,�i Ali 00vote,Wild's are exclilldod f(avt the Mudy
OMA
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 12 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
Annex
Members rf th andhol�ders ' ar le
Parks r.k',inadE) Andrew Campbell (Chair) VP I ten'tat Refations and
Visitor Experience
Par Canada Catherine Gmmier Dlr. Rouge NatiOnal Urbain
Park trrtttetr r"
Par Canada I Dianne Rrrriew (Secretary) Sr Realty dvi-or
Provhice ref Orrtarb Bfuce Singbiush, Director, Real Estate Policy
mistry of
two"r t.r tare
Prrr race of 0ntano Vk;tona Vidal rbas Assistant Deputy tktrntstefr,
(Mini'stry of Strrrtegt c Reel Estate Asset
Toronto Region BrianDenney Chef Admirtistrafive Officer
Conser v tt'orr
rrt rortt TRCA
('fty rat Toronto John Livey Deputy 0ty ana er
City of Pickerhx horrl s Melymuk Director, Office of
Su t inal6iftrty
Town n r.rti t lairt'trrriir nd 'Taylor Chief Adn tmstratrve Officer
R,eq, ion of York,, Bnjce McGreq er ChiefAdmirdstrativeOfficer
t c trrrr r-.wf t. rwrrtIaMi 140slef Choniobay, Orr. Strategic Manning
Rouge e Perk Abn Welts ChaJr
fart *e
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 13 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
Attachment
I m kn Nvo
LAND r
COMPONENTS alai `°I' NG NAT10NAL URBAN
��-
,% ..r. ,,..
201,� r,�m.r,e i„t�i
LANDHOLDERS TABLE � � �,,.�, mm�, � j,�,
lk
mu pmnrwdr�s r ri a?srau�r6u t, it r
Y. mu wv�
o
V NIklF Pi�pad3B[,�,gNYa WNiV9"r
N ISM A tl"'Ou.4ARog
a Key Elements of the VIsIarn
>� V�ar�ruvookGd!�rek�V7�&V9w�4�awVta!��W
� Vll9Wrµp+�!�YN�aP 41�'WU".Nr4��&r�lp%IGP&pVaW8n8Y�N
NAY rmGw M"N'Mbrrodrr
Ptatirting Process
rrsirrisr.� �:r~rr
a IMrrlma and Concepts
a"Trasr ksam Mpasures
a Interim Mraramgrrmens Wdelines
r%
WWO M
w tAtOM001 of Ill mmrrsw r NafImr W Mao Park Concept
+ ralb•party d gmemsont
on d.aiaacd:Vander
14urrM
p Id 91 a IU G C a,N,r I'll L 11 AT d Cl dsd
Park Esdaddl
m Interhi Macispnout Guideffilm
nr rmm Publit Input Surantary
L4
sr �....
mrp fyry
/ �� 6
,..... „�, „„ ,r /:, iir�z �;.�air f,��illl Rio/y AG�art9lyd 1�
.,.,,.ti� �m�r�r mmrrt�bu!Ni�hwmVwoWoV00100mVfVN�INIIMIVII "�
Gyrya �°wk
1, . ,. w�I
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 14 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
2. Rouge Park Trails Master Plan for Approval
KEY ISSUE
Approval of the Rouge Park Trails Master Plan,which has been reviewed by stakeholders, presented to the
Alliance and the public and is in its final draft form.
MOTION: Moved by: Jack Heath
Seconded by: Peter Rodrigues
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the report and approve the Rouge Park Trails Master Plan;
AND FURTHER THAT the final approved Rouge Park Trails Master Plan be circulated to City of Toronto,
Town of Markham, City of Pickering,York and Durham Regions,Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority, and Parks Canada.
AMENDMENTS agreed to during discussion:
1. Insert the following as the 2nd paragraph:
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance thank all the public participants,the Trails Advisory Committee members,
municipal participants,and staff in completing the Rouge Park Trails Master Plan;
2. Remove the words"final approved"from the first line of the third paragraph,and add the following words
"for their consideration"at the end of the third paragraph.
MOTION AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
MOTION: Moved by: Jack Heath
Res.#18/12: Seconded by: Peter Rodrigues
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the report and approve the Rouge Park Trails Master Plan;
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance thank all the public participants,the Trails Advisory Committee
members, municipal participants, and staff in completing the Rouge Park Trails Master Plan;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Trails Master Plan be circulated to City of Toronto,Town of
Markham, City of Pickering,York and Durham Regions, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority,
and Parks Canada for their consideration.
AMENDMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
Rouge Park staff to take appropriate action.
BACKGROUND
Study Administration:
In autumn of 2009,a Trails Advisory Committee was formed and tasked with developing the Trails Master
Plan. This committee was comprised of Rouge Park Alliance partners and trail stakeholders from the Rouge
Park Alliance, City of Toronto,Toronto and Region Conservation Authority,York Region,Town of Markham,
Durham Region, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources,Transport Canada,and the Oak Ridges Trail
Association.
Specifically,the committee's role in the development of the Trails Master Plan has been to provide direction
and technical guidance,share information and give feedback to the Rouge Park staff and the consultants. The
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 15 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
committee developed a terms of reference,and hired Schollen and Company Inc.as the lead consultant for
the project.
Trail Master Plan Goals:
There are 3 main objectives to the plan:
Protect important natural heritage features
o Protect existing natural heritage features and functions
o Enhance habitat connectivity, diversity and function where possible
o Avoid fragmentation
o Generally avoid steep slopes and areas prone to flooding or erosion where possible
Provide a continuous north-south and east west linkage to neighbouring trail system
o Provide for a multi-use trail connection from the Waterfront to the Oak Ridges Moraine
o Provide key linkages to connect neighbourhoods adjacent to Rouge Park
o Provide a multi-modal trail network that maximizes accessibility and is integrated with public
transit
Respect and celebrate significant cultural and agricultural heritage resources
o Capitalize on interpretive opportunities
o Avoid sensitive cultural heritage features and landscapes
Visitor safety is key in all trail elements of planning.
Study Process:
Development of the Rouge Park Trails Master Plan has been quite thorough. The Trails Advisory Committee
along with Schollen and Company Inc, has done extensive research and background review,followed by a
number of trail concepts and revisions. Public and stakeholder consultation has been integral throughout the
process. The plan has been presented to a number of audiences, including several presentations to the Rouge
Park Alliance.
Further consultation of the Plan included a presentation to Markham's Development Services Committee,a
broad group of staff specialists from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority,and our park partners at
the City of Toronto,all of whom have provided their feedback. We have also received comments from other
park enthusiasts and they have been submitted to the consultant for consideration.
Phase One: Background Review
Phase Two: Trail Concept, Design and Standards and Communications
Phase Three: Draft Plan and Consultation
Phase Four: Review,Submission and Approval
RATIONALE
Our Rouge Park Alliance partners, including detailed review by Markham,Toronto,and the TRCA, in addition
to the public,are in general support of the Plan.
The plan has gone through extensive consultation and a number of refinements to ensure that the document
closely reflects the Park's natural,agricultural,and cultural heritage guiding principles. Rouge Park staff and
the Trails Advisory Committee are confident that this plan is ready for final approval.
The Trails Master Plan will be an essential tool for connecting areas within Rouge Park,and to the surrounding
communities and trail systems. The trail system plays an integral role in providing Rouge Park visitors with a
tangible nature experience, by allowing them to see the diverse habitats and rich cultural history that the Park
strives to protect.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 16 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
NEXT STEPS
The final approved report will be circulated to Rouge Park Alliance Partners,and Parks Canada for reference
and for discussing an implementation strategy.
Report prepared by: Michelle Holmes,Manager of Visitor Experience,Rouge Park
For information contact: Michelle Holmes,(905)713-6021,email:michelle_holmesgrougepark.com
Date: April 11,2012
3. Update to the November 19, 2010 Fuel/Oil Spill to the Little Rouge Creek
From the Standard Auto Wreckers Property
KEY ISSUE
Provide an Update to the November 19,2010 fuel/oil spill to the Little Rouge Creek from the Standard Auto
Wreckers property.
MOTION: Moved by: Peter Rodrigues
Res.#19/12: Seconded by: Jack Heath
THAT the Update to the November 19, 2010 fuel/oil spill to the Little Rouge Creek from the Standard
Auto Wreckers property be received for information;
AND FURTHER THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)staff be requested to continue
to liaise with the affected parties regarding the future clean-up and land transfer issues related to this
property.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
TRCA staff to continue to liaise with affected parties on the future cleanup and land
transfer issues.
BACKGROUND
At the February 10, 2011 meeting of the Rouge Park Alliance (RPA),TRCA committed to reporting back to the
Rouge Park Alliance regarding the status of the remediation and land transfer issues on a regular basis.
In addition,at the February RPA meeting,the representative of the Rouge Park Alliance requested TRCA
provide information regarding TRCA monitoring programs, if any, in the Little Rouge Creek. This information
is provided below.
Update on the Delineation Plan
Goldy Metals Inc.submitted a revised Supplemental Delineation Investigation report, dated March 23,2012
and received by TRCA on March 27, 2012. This report was also submitted to the Ministries of the Environment
(MOE)and Infrastructure Ontario (10). TRCA staff is reviewing the report and will provide comments to MOE
staff. MOE will coordinate a response to Goldy Metals, on behalf of and in consultation with all agencies.
Goldy Metals has requested information regarding TRCA permitting and approval processes in relation to the
delineation and restoration plan. This information has been provided. To date, no formal applications for
works in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06 has been received.
TRCA Monitoring of Little Rouge Creek
TRCA has confirmed that there is no recent stream sampling for the Little Rouge Creek. TRCA sampled within
this watercourse in 2005 for the purpose of writing the Fisheries Management Plan (FMP),which was well in
advance of the 2010 spill. Metrics included fish community,stream temperature and wetted width. Only 5
fish species were collected during this sampling event and represented cool to warm water preference and
very tolerant of degraded habitat conditions.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 17 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
Other fish collection events occurred in reaches just downstream of this watercourse (approximately
Meadowvale Road and Old Finch Avenue). The first known fish collection records for this area were submitted
to the MNR in 1983 and 1984. A total of 14 fish species were collected during this timeframe and represented
a fairly even distribution of cool to warm water species with varying degrees of ecological tolerance. Coarse
level aquatic habitat metrics may also have been collected.
In the same downstream area as described above,TRCA sampling began in 2000 as a precursor to indentifying
TRCA Regional Monitoring Sites. A second FMP sampling site was also located here (2005). Metrics included
fish community and/or stream temperature and/or various aquatic habitat characteristics. The combined total
of fish species collected was 13 species (not all the same as 1980s sampling) which represented a broader
range of temperature preference (cold to warm water) and more sensitive species.
TRCA regional monitoring sites were selected based on regional interests. While Little Rouge Creek was not
selected as a study site in the regional study,there is a TRCA regional monitoring site located downstream of
this watercourse's confluence with the main Rouge River. However,the regional monitoring site is distant to
the sampling sites discussed above,and it can therefore not be used for comparative purposes. The last
sampling of the regional monitoring site was in 2009,and it is scheduled to be sampled again in the summer
of 2012. At the regional level,the following metrics are collected: fish community,stream temperature and
benthic invertebrates. In 2009, 13 fish species were collected representing a wider diversity than found in the
upstream sites (i.e., new species that prefer slower moving water and tolerance to fine sediments).
Update on the Land Transfer
TRCA, MOE and IO continue to acknowledge that there is 2004 land transfer agreement between TRCA and
the Province of Ontario. TRCA has discussed this agreement with Parks Canada and will involve Parks Canada
in future discussions.
Report Prepared by: Beth Williston,Senior Manager-EA Planning,TRCA
For information contact: Beth Williston,416-661-6600 Ext.5217,email: bwillistonotrca.on.ca
Date: April 11,2012
MOTION: Moved by: Jim Robb
Res.#20/12: Seconded by: Pauline Browes
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance request that the Ministry of the Environment, Department of Fisheries
and Oceans, Ministry of Natural Resources,and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
provide water quality, benthic and fish survey data for upstream and downstream of the Standard Auto
Wreckers property over the last several years;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Alliance request that the Ministry of the Environment, Ministry of
Natural Resources, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority cooperate to conduct water quality,fish and benthic surveys upstream and downstream of
the Standard Auto Wreckers property at least twice a year during low flow and wet weather stream
conditions.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
Rouge Park staff to take appropriate action.
4. Rouge Park Ambassador Program Update
KEY ISSUE
Provide an update and progress report on the Rouge Park Ambassador Program.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 18 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
MOTION: Moved by: Clyde Smith
Res.#21/12: Seconded by: Peter Rodrigues
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the report;
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance direct staff to continue to grow and develop the ambassador
program;
AND FURTHER THAT a copy of this report be circulated to appropriate representatives from the City of
Toronto,York Region,Town of Markham, and Parks Canada for information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
Rouge Park staff to take appropriate action.
BACKGROUND
In July 2011,the Rouge Park Ambassador Program was launched following approval to proceed from the
Rouge Park Alliance. At the Rouge Park Alliance meeting on May 13,2011,the following resolution and
amendment was approved.
Res.#17/11
"THAT a volunteer based Ambassador/Park Watch Program,as outlined in this report, be implemented as
funding permits;
AND FURTHER THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) be requested to formalize its
volunteer agreement with Rouge Watch."
AMENDMENT Res.#17A/11
"THAT the Rouge Park Alliance direct staff to report back to the Alliance in a year on the progress of the
program, including a description of legislated mandates and regulatory options of agencies,e.g.Trespass
to Property Act, Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, municipal by-laws,Conservation Authorities Act,etc."
The Rouge Park Ambassador Program has been established as a volunteer based program supported by staff,
providing an informed and educated presence in the Park for assistance to visitors and deterrence of
unwanted activities,whether in public or non-public areas.
The guided walk leaders have,since May 2010, helped to convey the Rouge Park code of conduct and share
educational messages to the public along the trail system. While they would address code of conduct issues
as they happen,their focus has been to deliver the guided nature outing. Thus, it revealed the need to have
ambassador volunteers more dedicated to self-guided walkers and others visiting the Park.
There was also a need for a 'neighbourhood watch'style program away from the trail and public areas. These
ambassador volunteers are focused on the residential,agricultural and non-public natural areas of the Park.
The ambassador program's objectives are:
1) to assist those visiting the Park with a welcome to the Park, navigation and outing ideas;
2) to convey and uphold the Park's Code of Conduct to visitors through direct messaging (i.e. dogs off-
leash,cycling on trails,off-trail access, parking);
3) to collect data for Rouge Park and enforcement partners that aids in identifying patterns of unwanted
activities(i.e. kite fighting, dogs off-leash, dumping);
4) to identify and report situations beyond the direct action of the volunteer requiring enforcement
partner action (i.e. poaching,criminal activity,trespassing).
From late summer into late fall of 2011, initial volunteer recruitment and enforcement partner consultation
took place to shape the program and activate the first team of ambassadors.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 19 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
The Rouge Park enforcement partners include:
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources,Aurora District Conservation Officers
City of Toronto Municipal Licensing & Standards, Parks Enforcement
Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division - Rouge Park Maintenance Staff
Toronto Police 42 Division
Toronto Zoo Security
Town of Markham Bylaw Enforcement
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Enforcement
York Regional Police 5 District
Through supportive and informed dialogue with the enforcement partners,an Observation,Action and
Reporting Protocol was created, presented and provided to all Trail Leaders and Ambassadors in late
November 2011. This protocol includes a menu of the most likely non-permitted activities in the Park and it
lists key steps,course of action,contact information and municipal by-law information (Toronto and
Markham) to guide the action,which can be taken by the Ambassadors.
The program organizes ambassadors into two streams:Trail and Park. Trail ambassadors roam the public
areas and official trails. Park ambassadors focus on the non-public areas: residential,agriculture and natural.
Trail ambassadors are expected to have the most frequent direct contact with the public,which requires
specific skills for an outdoor setting where safety is a priority. To assist them,they are trained under the Hike
Ontario Certified Hike Leader protocol for trail leadership skills, best practices in an area of conservation and
practical trail skills. They also receive training to certify for Standard First Aid Level C (Canadian Red Cross). In
addition,they work in pairs for general safety purposes. All this training that is provided is the same for the
walks leaders,thereby creating a volunteer team that may transfer seamlessly between roles.
Park ambassadors may have less public contact,and focus more on strong observation skills, identifying
patterns of activity in non-public areas, providing data for enforcement partners to use and being more like a
'neighbourhood watch'style of program. All volunteers gain instruction in approach,assertiveness and
resolution with regard to any contact with the public. In addition,all ambassadors must complete a
Vulnerable Sector Screening check,as part of the TRCA's volunteer policy.
At the time of this report, 4 Park Ambassadors are active,with 5 more anticipated to join in 2012. Five Trail
Ambassadors are active and 9 new ambassadors have just completed training.
The ambassador program follows and applies these regulations/mandates with attention to specific
subsections as related to Rouge Park:
Town of Markham:
• Bylaw 126-72 - dumping
• Bylaw 167-92 - public and commercial use of parks
• Bylaw 2005-254 - animal care and control, i.e. dogs off-leash and other related offences
• Bylaw 2005-188 - parking
• York Regional Police—contact 911 for any threatening situation,assault,theft,fire
• York Regional Police—Trespass to Property Act, R.S.O. 1990,c.T.21 -trespassing
City of Toronto:
• Municipal Code, Chapter 548 -dumping
• Municipal Code, Chapter 608 - public and commercial use of parks/conservation areas, including
parking
• Toronto Police Service Regulation,Section 2(1),Subsection Al,-trespassing
• Toronto Police Service—contact 911 for any threatening situation,assault,theft,fire
• Toronto Police Service - regulations regarding roadway parking
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 20 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources:
• Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act-all matters related to hunting,taking and possessing wildlife,
wildlife in captivity,trespassing to hunt and fish and some matters related to fishing
• Ontario Fishing Regulations- matters dealing with commercial fishing, bait fishing and sport
fishing
• Endangered Species Act -any harvest, possession of ESA species or alteration to ESA habitat
• Motorized Snow Vehicles Act -all associated licensing, permitting and operation of snowmobiles
• Off-Road Vehicles Act-all associated licensing, permitting and operation of off- road vehicles
(ATVs)
• Public Lands Act- includes unlawful building,works without a permit, deposit material or litter on
crown land
• Fisheries Act -destruction of Fish Habitat,addition of deleterious substances
• Small Vessels Regulations - navigation and safety equipment requirements for operation of
watercraft
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority:
o Trespass to Property Act, R.S.O. 1990,c.T.21 -trespassing
The protocol describes the steps to take in situations:
1) whereby the volunteer can act on their own,then communicate in their shift report (i.e. trail
maintenance, dog off-leash,cycling off-road,walking off-trail),which triggers follow up by Rouge Park
to the appropriate partner as needed as well as data collection
2) whereby the volunteer can act and also notify an enforcement partner immediately for non-
emergency action or information (i.e. witnessing dumping or illegal parking,can let offender know it is
illegal and call Toronto or Markham contact,request to stop fiddlehead picking and then calling MNR
TIPS line)
3) whereby the volunteer should not/cannot act for his/her safety and calls enforcement partner for an
emergency response (i.e. a simple conversation with a visitor becomes threatening,witnessing
criminal activity,witnessing higher alert natural heritage abuse like poaching).
PARKS CANADA AND VOLUNTEERING:
As Rouge Park is now formally progressing to become a National Park, it is worthwhile to highlight the Parks
Canada Volunteer Program for reference and future adaptation/inclusion.The following is taken from the
Parks Canada Volunteer Program webpages.
Volunteer opportunities are in these streams of interest:
Visitor Experience(example,campground hosts,assist with interpretive programs,assist in tourguides,special
events)
Culture and Heritage(example,period costume fabrication,restoration of artefacts,archaeological projects)
Nature and Ecology(example,rare plant inventory,tree planting,butterflies count,frog monitoring,rare species
survey)
Facilities Maintenance(example,trail rehabilitation,campground upkeep)
Volunteers must apply to be considered,and offer sufficient information or a resume to assist with
appropriate placement. Commitment may be relatively casual to more fixed scheduling to even living on site,
depending on the particular volunteer role. In general, no special skills are needed, but some positions do
require skilled volunteers. All volunteers will be provided with the necessary safety training and equipment.
All ages of volunteers are welcome, but those under 18 must have parental permission,and those over 85 are
not covered under the National Volunteer Program Insurance Policy.
French is an asset for volunteering for Parks Canada outside of Quebec but not mandatory, but either English
Baum ii1uii.1,L II.'�e a Ilan givage sIpolkei iu Il:'�y ary V611i1111ILe i%
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 21 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
International volunteer opportunities exist year-round, but the applicant must arrange their own visas or
permits for volunteering in Canada.
Volunteers are promised a supportive and rewarding experience:
You can expect to be greeted by people that sincerely value and welcome volunteers.
You can expect to be treated with respect.
You can expect to connect to your natural and cultural heritage.
You can expect to learn,to give,to make a difference and to have new experiences.
You can expect to meet new people who share similar interests.
You can expect to have fun!
RATIONALE
An enforcement program has long been needed to support the Park's and TRCA Enforcement staff as'eyes
and ears'for the entire Park. The program also helps to augment the presence of staff in the Park, providing
greater oversight.
The Ambassador team applies a 'welcome and watch'concept. They help to enable Park staff to extend our
geographic reach and expand our messaging to any visitor, not only those on a guided walk.
The action and reporting protocol will evolve with changes to bylaws,regulations and laws at the municipal,
provincial and federal level. It will also evolve to keep contact information and process steps accurate,as well
as include'new'actions and activities that may develop over time. Rouge Park and the enforcement partners
will need to stay current with changes and communicate updates as they emerge.
The program provides the ambassadors with resources to help develop assertiveness and resolution skills as
they handle conversations with visitors.
Overall,the Rouge Park ambassador program will help to improve visitor experience,while at the same time
protecting the sensitive natural heritage features of the Park. In addition,the program applies all relevant
municipal, provincial and federal laws and is supported by partner enforcement agencies.
FUTURE BENEFITS/CHALLENGES
As the team grows,our coverage of the Park will increase proportionately. For example,a goal for the trail
areas is to see teams on each trail throughout a weekend (i.e. 9:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.) with no gaps.
Retention of volunteers is always a challenge and succession of volunteers is a reality. The program is
designed to be supportive,friendly and rewarding to secure volunteer services beyond the one year we ask of
them initially. This will extend the value of the investment,sustain the team's capacity, have seasoned
volunteers execute the program and assist in the mentoring of new members.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Going forward, Rouge Park staff will continue to grow and develop the program. Staff will continue to
increase the number of ambassador volunteers,especially in the context of Rouge Park's growing profile and
growing visitor numbers,as well as the opening of the new Bob Hunter Memorial Park in Spring 2013. The
expansion of the program will help build strong and positive visitor relationships from the start. Staff will also
review the program with Parks Canada staff and make changes as requested.
Funding has been granted from the TD Canada Trust Friends of the Environment to add 7 new Trail
Ambassadors in August 2012. All of this funding will be directed towards getting the new ambassadors
properly trained and ready for service.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The overall cost of the ambassador program is very minimal,and is relative to the numbers in action.
Leveraged against our investment,the value of the volunteers'work is immense,which is directed toward the
promotion and protection of the Park. To date,funding for the ambassador program has come from
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 22 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
corporate grants and revenues from private guided walks. In 2012,the Ambassador Program is fully self-
financed and does not require any budgeted Rouge Park funds. At this point,the staff time to coordinate the
program is being committed as in-kind. Funding sources for 2013 will be identified,and it is suggested that
funding could be available from the Town of Markham.
Detailed costs,which are covered by grants and hike revenues include:
Trail Ambassadors:
Approx. $300 per volunteer:Standard First Aid Level C, Hike Ontario Safe Hiker and Certified Hike Leader,
seasonal uniforms and safety outfitting, recognition and reward items
Park Ambassadors:
Approx. $100 per volunteer:seasonal uniforms and safety outfitting,recognition and reward items
Report prepared by: Diana Smyth,Trail Coordinator,Rouge Park,and
Mike Bender,Acting General Manager,Rouge Park
For information contact: Diana Smyth,905-713-3184,email:diana_smythgrougepark.com
Mike Bender,905-713-7374,email:m bend ergtrca.on.ca
Date: April 10,2012
5. Watershed Report Cards
KEY ISSUE
Preparation of the next Rouge Watershed Report Card following Conservation Ontario guidelines.
MOTION: Moved by: Lilli Duoba
Res.#22/12: Seconded by: Bill Rapley
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance appoint the Manager of Natural Heritage to assist in the research,writing
and production of the Rouge Watershed Report Card.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Watershed Report Cards have been produced by local Conservation Authorities for many of the watersheds
across Ontario over the years. These documents communicate the condition of various aspects of watersheds
such as water quality, natural cover and recommendations for stewardship.
As of November 2010,28 of the 36 Conservation Authorities in Ontario were producing watershed report
cards. Unfortunately,there were many inconsistencies between the various jurisdictions in terms of
methodology,content,format and frequency of publication. To help bring consistency to the way
Conservation Authorities produce Watershed Report Cards, Conservation Ontario has introduced a set of
guidelines,which are summarized below.
Indicators:
Conservation Authorities are asked to report on a standard set of indicators as listed below. This recognizes
that different jurisdictions have more or less ability to produce report cards due to available resources.
• Surface water quality - E. coli,total phosphorus and benthic invertebrates
• Forest conditions-forest cover,forest interior and percent riparian forest
• Groundwater quality- nitrate and nitrites
Space is available for one additional indicator that reflects an important issue for the subject watershed. In
the case of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's jurisdiction,stormwater management/river flow
has been chosen as the additional indicator to be presented for all watersheds.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 23 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
Watershed Features:
The report cards will include a basic summary of other watershed features that help to describe the watershed
and give an indication of environmental stresses. These features would include parameters such as land use,
population,watercourse length and natural cover types. We know that significant efforts are being invested
in the protection and restoration of watersheds. Therefore,several examples of current efforts and priority
next steps will also be provided to recognize leadership and encourage future actions.
Grading:
Each indicator will be assigned one of the grades listed below,according to a standardized ranking system for
all Conservation Authorities across Ontario:
A - Excellent
B -Good
C - Fair
D - Poor
F -Very Poor
Format:
There are three formats for delivering watershed information to relevant audiences and it is recommended
that Conservation Authorities utilize each of these:
• Background Report outlining methodology, individual watershed and subwatershed data and supporting
resource information;
• Public outreach summary report card that profiles watershed,and to the extent possible,subwatershed
grades as well as programs and stewardship actions that residents can implement;
• Website page that provides easy access to all products.
The Conservation Ontario template uses a number of common features,yet still provides enough flexibility in
writing and design to ensure local issues are reflected in each Watershed Report Card. This approach will
increase their recognition as a standardized group of Watershed Report Cards produced by Conservation
Authorities across the province.
Frequency:
Watershed Report Cards will be completed once every five years starting in 2012. Using five-year blocks of
data minimizes seasonal variation and sampling error,and provides sufficient data for reliable summary
statistics for surface water and groundwater samples. This five-year step also coincides with census
information which can be incorporated into the report cards.
The next set of report cards must be completed by December 31,2012,using data from 2006 - 2010.
Conservation Ontario will launch the watershed report cards as a group in March 2013 to coincide with World
Water Day. Each Conservation Authority is encouraged to promote their own report cards to their local media
outlets to bring more attention to the product.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
• Rouge Park staff will collaborate with TRCA staff(led by the Humber Watershed Team) to prepare the 2012
edition of the Rouge Watershed Report Card,following the Conservation Ontario guidelines.
• TRCA ecology staff will compile technical information and assign grades to each of the 8 indicators
prescribed in the guidelines, based on 2006-2010 monitoring data. Where possible, data will be
compared with earlier reports to indicate trends.
• Rouge Park staff will prepare the watershed features summary,current leadership actions and key next
steps required to improve conditions,and will edit the technical data to fit the template.
• A new,comprehensive technical background report will not be produced. Relevant background
information is available in existing reports which will be available on the TRCA website (i.e. regional
monitoring summary reports).
• Rouge Park staff will share the report cards with community/volunteer groups as required,and will
organize or participate in other media events related to the launch of the Rouge Watershed Report Card.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 24 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
TIMELINE
Watershed Report Cards for all Conservation Authorities will be launched at the same time across Ontario, in
March 2013,to coincide with World Water Week. Final drafts of the Report Cards will be completed by August
2012,to allow time for review, design and printing.
ASSOCIATED COSTS:
TRCA has a limited amount of funding to produce and print all Watershed Report Cards for its jurisdiction.
Rouge Park will contribute staff time to the preparation of the Rouge Watershed Report Card,as well as media
and outreach related to the eventual launch.
Report Prepared by: Maria Papoulias,Manager,Natural Heritage,Rouge Park
Contact Information: Maria Papoulias,905 713 6308;email:maria_papouliasgrougepark.com
Date: March 30,2012
6. Restoration Areas In Rouge Park Potentially Available in 2013
KEY ISSUE
Report on restoration areas in Rouge Park that may be available for plantings by NGOs/community groups in
2013.
MOTION: Moved by: Debbie Pella Keen
Res.#23/12: Seconded by: Jim Robb
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the following report and refer this to the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority and Parks Canada.
AMENDMENT Moved by: Debbie Pella Keen
Res.#23A/22 Seconded by: Jim Robb
AND THAT staff explore potential areas in and around the park that would support open meadow type
habitat that support species at risk;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Alliance look at additional non-farm sites and contingency sites
that would be available for restoration.
AMENDMENT .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Rouge Park staff has identified approximately 24 ha of restoration areas that may be available for plantings by
NGOs/community groups in 2013,as shown in Figure 1, below. This includes about 3 ha in the City of Toronto
and 21 ha in the Town of Markham.
The areas shown in Figure 1 include 3 ha of vacant land in the City of Toronto,which will require soil
amendments to be completed in 2012 in order to provide suitable conditions for reforestation in 2013. An
approximately 8 ha site in Markham was retired from agriculture at the end of 2010 and has been receiving
soil amendments in preparation for 2013 restoration. The remainder of the areas shown in Figure 1 will be
retired from agriculture at the end of 2012,as soon as crops are harvested. The timing of restoration has been
negotiated with all farm tenants affected.
Staff will proceed to undertake all necessary actions to prepare these sites for 2013 restoration, including
archaeological clearances,tenant contact and site preparation. Staff will discuss the available restoration
areas with various community groups that have the capability to undertake restoration work in the Park,
including those that have partnered with Rouge Park in the past. Areas available for 2013 plantings may be
limited by archaeological findings, budget available for restoration work,or other considerations.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 25 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
Report Pepared By: Maria Papoulias,Manager,Natural Heritage,Rouge Park
For information contact: Maria Papoulias,905-713-6308 -email:maria_papouliasgrougepark.com
Date: April 2,2012
Attachment
Legend
Vii✓�r /,,,,'///o ;// / j/,1,r ��/`�'oi�%�/
Highway/Freeway It
Mayor Roads
UUatercourse
Restoration timeline
2713
Rouge Park
10/r/ I f r;,°! ,� �%f., �„ �`;; rY �, y4 �r� ., ///( 'W'//ai ,1 / Y/�j r ��✓ /
d I ul VII�W ,� � �/ � I'F�'%v///r'�/ W✓� r,'// J (� l�°'��j�,,� -,� pie: y �if�� f '�.�j
b
'�i /// '.�i� 1 / � ✓/�A� ����� �Luc r//
1�u%ice„ll�%, ” �rr'ks����✓'$., ;����j,rf, 1, , �' �y, r%;, ;.;;%r�/ r���1'//�/
r'�,lr,<1'" 7/r//i/'��i/ �i�f/a/ ,;�� 1��,: ��"�,rjt�li/'a (�'� x /l�� ,✓//��.r,,�A,a!
u r/; �li I f �/ �/����/✓/oI 1 1 ti� loll
"���', ��(' �a/ fl�'/' ��; U✓/„ /fib P'r.�����'r iI ;r// 11��/l' /��g, ,''/ �rvl� �'r
Figure 1 - Proposed Areas Potentially Available for Restoration in 2013
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 26 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
7. Possible Future Rouge Park Restoration Opportunities
KEY ISSUE
Overview of sites in Rouge Park where some restoration may occur in the future,subject to further planning
and approvals.
MOTION: Moved by: Jack Heath
Res.#24/12: Seconded by: Pauline Browes
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the following report.
AMENDMENT Moved by: Jack Heath
Res.#24A/12: Seconded by: Pauline Browes
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance also consider Highway 407/utility facilities and railway lands on the
fringe of Rouge Park.
AMENDMENT .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At the September 16,2011 Rouge Park Alliance meeting,staff brought forward a report identifying restoration
areas that would likely be available to allocate to community groups in Rouge Park from 2013 to 2015, based
on current,approved Rouge Park management plans. This report showed that the designated restoration
sites available for allocation to NGOs, based on current plans,total approximately 20 ha for 2013,and 4 ha
each for 2014 and 2015. Other restoration sites identified in approved Rouge Park plans were deferred for 5-
10 years based on discussions with farm tenants in 2009,and will become available for restoration between
2016 -2019,at a similar rate of several hectares per year. However,these numbers do not reflect the fact that
additional restoration sites may become available in future years,subject to further management planning
and/or discussions with other landowners. The following report provides an overview of some sites that may
become available for restoration in the future,and the actions required to confirm available areas.
SCOPE
This report deals only with sites within the original Rouge Park planning boundary,as presented in the 1994
Management Plan,and within the boundaries of the Little Rouge Corridor, Bob Hunter Memorial Park and
Markham East Lands,as designated by the Province of Ontario. Other portions of the Rouge North planning
area (as per the 2001 plan) and other areas surrounding Rouge Park that are not included in the boundaries
outlined above,are not covered in this report.
POTENTIAL RESTORATION SITES
Figure 1 outlines the boundaries ofareas 1- 7,which are discussed in further detail below.
1. Markham East Lands
The Markham East Lands are owned by the Province of Ontario. These lands,totaling 653 ha in size,were
dedicated to Rouge Park by the Province and are intended to be transferred into management of the
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) in the near future. The identification of restoration
zones within the Markham East Lands will occur as part of a future management plan. The current
position of the Rouge Park Alliance (RPA) is that the Markham East Lands will remain primarily as an
Agricultural Heritage Reserve. However,critical restoration to preserve and enhance the natural heritage
system and protect water quality will need to be completed. There may potentially be up to 200 ha of
restoration planned for this area under that scenario.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 27 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
2. Beare Road Landfill
The Beare Road Landfill is about 32 ha in size and is owned and managed by the City of Toronto. A
management plan for this former landfill is currently underway,and is being led by City of Toronto staff
with the involvement of Rouge Park staff. Much of the site has already been restored,and there will likely
be restoration of some form on most of the remainder of the site.
3. "Village Securities" Site
Approximately 4 ha are owned by the City of Toronto on this site,split into two parcels by Hydro corridor
and other utility easements in the centre. Preliminary discussions with City staff have indicated that some
restoration may be contemplated in suitable areas on this site, but further discussions will need to be
undertaken and final approval will rest with City of Toronto staff.
4. "Runnymede" Property (23 ha)
5. "Anndale" Site (18 ha)
6. Former Metro Nursery Site (9 ha)
Management plans are in the process of being developed for the three sites listed above. Rouge Park staff
is developing plans that will balance all park objectives and include restoration wherever appropriate.
Further consultation with Parks Canada staff will need to be undertaken before management plans for
these areas are finalized.
Runnymede: In advance of an approved restoration plan,staff has allocated approximately 5 ha of the 23
ha Runnymede site for restoration by Friends of the Rouge Watershed (FRW) in 2012 (identified as a high-
priority forest buffer in the draft restoration plan for this area). It is likely that the majority of this site will
ultimately be restored, but discussions with Parks Canada will be required before plans are finalized,as
part of this area may be desirable for visitor use.
Anndale: About half of the"Anndale"site is owned by the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO),
and negotiations are underway to transfer the MTO lands to Rouge Park. The"Anndale"site has
significant potential as a visitor use area, due to its historic significance and strategic location bordering a
residential area. A portion of this site would be ideal for community gardens. The historic Tyrell farm and
apple orchards should be preserved and interpreted. The remainder of the site (about 50% or more),
particularly the portions bordering the Rouge River valley,should be restored.
Former Metro Nursery: City of Toronto forestry staff, in partnership with Rouge Park staff, is developing a
restoration plan for the former Metro Nursery site. The draft plan prescribes renaturalization of the entire
site, including preservation of meadow habitat in the western quadrant,removal of invasive species,
thinning/removal of non-native ornamental trees that were planted on site,and interplanting of native
species.
7. Deferred Restoration
Additional restoration areas may become available as plans are updated for the roughly 300 hectares of
park land deferred for future planning north of Highway 7 and in Bob Hunter Memorial Park east of Reesor
Road. The ultimate use of these lands will be determined as part of a future management planning
process led by Parks Canada. In advance of commencement of that process, it is not appropriate to
predict how much restoration will occur in these areas. If it is determined that the majority of the deferred
areas should remain in agriculture,then critical restorations to connect habitat blocks and protect water
quality will still need to be achieved,and may comprise up to 20% of the area. If it is decided that the area
should be primarily dedicated to habitat restoration,then the number could be much higher.
8. Hydro Corridors
There are several hydro corridors that transect Rouge Park. Planting of trees on hydro corridors will not be
possible, due to maintenance requirements, but these sites could be appropriate for meadow habitat
enhancements. Negotiations with Hydro One will be necessary.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 28 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
9. Miscellaneous Smaller Areas
There are some smaller sites scattered throughout the Park that could be made available for restoration in
the future,such as old homestead sites, other disturbed areas, marginal farmland,etc. Many of these sites
will require cleanup/remediation and/or control of invasive species before planting can occur. Some will
require negotiation with tenants (residential or farm areas).
10. Future Acquisitions
Additional lands suitable for restoration may be added to Rouge Park in future acquisitions.
SUMMARY
As described above and displayed in Figure 1,there are over 1000 ha of land in Rouge Park for which
management plans/agreements still need to be developed. In accordance with current Rouge Park Alliance
direction,the majority of this area is likely to remain in agriculture. However, restoration zones to protect
critical natural features and systems will be designated even in areas that will primarily be reserved for
agriculture. Other smaller, non-agricultural areas described above may be almost entirely designated for
restoration,subject to further management planning that balances all park objectives.
Parks Canada will be leading the development of an integrated management plan for all Rouge Park lands. In
advance of that process, it is not appropriate to predict what proportion of the 1000+ ha described above may
be designated for restoration.
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 29 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
f-
i
ri
i�r �� o 4 � �� i�rii/ �✓r1l�V�r ��/� «rr�/�k�A�����, yn i��' f �f" n
��� � i���e, r f l � v�� �,"� v ��, � /% � "yi �//r r�c,�✓��WiMw a',.
I
v rf g rt
M i
r �
r
� pr,r r
Figure 1: Boundaries of areas 1-7,which are discussed further in the text. There is potential for restoration
to occur on portions of some or all of these areas in the future,subject to further planning and
discussion with partners.
Report prepared by: Maria Papoulias,Manager,Natural Heritage,Rouge Park
For information contact: Maria Papoulias,905-713-6308 -email:maria_papouliasgrougepark.com
Date: April 2,2012
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 30 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
8. Rouge Park Natural Heritage Committee Meeting Minutes-January 25 and March 13,2012
KEY ISSUE
Provide the actions,recommendations and outcomes of the Rouge Park Natural Heritage Committee
meetings held on January 25 and March 13, 2012.
MOTION: Moved by: Jack Heath
Res.#25/12: Seconded by: Pauline Browes
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the minutes of the Rouge Park Natural Heritage Committee
meetings of January 25 and March 13, 2012.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
9. Wetland Restoration on TRCA-Owned Lands- Guiding Principles
KEY ISSUE
Wetland Restoration Guiding Principles for wetland restoration projects on TRCA-owned lands, including
Rouge Park.
MOTION: Moved by: Jack Heath
Res.#26/12: Seconded by: Peter Rodrigues
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance endorse the Wetland Restoration Guiding Principles.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
See attachment
Report prepared by: Maria Papoulias, Manager, Natural Heritage, Rouge Park
For information contact: Maria Papoulias, 905-713-6308;email: maria_papouliasgrougepark.com
Date: April 3,2012
Attachment
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 31 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
ATTACHMENT
TORONTO AND REGION
onservation
for The Living City
February 1, 2012 Sent via armed
SEE DISTRIBUTION LIST
At Authority Meeting #12/111, of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), Feld on January
2m7, 2012,amended Resolutnon #A275111 in regard to Wetland Restoration on Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority-owned Lands was approved as follows:
THA l°the Welland Restoration Guiding Principles be endorsed and used for wetland
implementation on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority(TRCA)-owned and managed
lands;
THAT the Welland Restoration Guiding Principles be forwarded to the Rouge Paris Alliance for
endorsement and implementation in Rouge Park;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA encourage the Rouge Park Alliance to continue its renaturali ation
as outlined in the Rowe Paris Heritage Plan.
Enclosed for your information and any,action deemed necessary Is the report as presented to the
Authority, prior to arn�endrnenL If you have any questions or require additional inforrnation, please
contact the undersigned at 415-661.6600 extension 5264 (kstranks @)trca.on.ca) or Gord MacPherson
at extension 5246 (grnac,pherson @trca.on.ca).
Sincerely
Kathy Stranks
Manager'„Chair`and CAO"s Office
M Gord MacPherson, Senior Manager, Restoration and Environmental Monitoring,TRCA
/'Errcl.
DISTRIBUTION LIST
Alan'fells, Chair, Rouge Park Alliance
Jim Robb, General Manager, Friends of the Rouge Watershed
Member of Conservation Ontario
...m. ,, ... Shor. iam Drive,Downsview, an tarb M3N IS4 (416)6.61�6600
FAX 66'1-6898 an+WW.rar,a.c]rt.ca
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 32 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
Item AUTH7.4
TO: Chair and Members of the Authority
Meeting #12/11, January 27, 2012
FROM: Nick Sacco,ne, Director, Restoration Services
RE: WETLAND RESTORATION ON TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION
AUTHORIITY-OWNED LANDS
Guiding: Principles
KEY ISSUE
Wefland Restoration Guiding Principles for wetland restoration projects on TRCA-owned lands
including the Rouge Park.
RECOMMENDATION
THAT the Wetland Restoration Guiding Principles be endorsed and! used for wetiand
implementation on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA -owned and
managed lands;
AND FURTHER THAT the Wetland Restoration Guiding Principles be forwarded to the
Rouge Park Alliance for endorsement and implementation in Rouge Park.
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #10/11, held on November 25, 2011, Resolution #A240/11 was approved
as follows:
THAT items AUTI-18.2 - Wetland Restoration oa Toronto an Region Conservation
Authority-Owned Lands be deferred to Authority Meeting #12111, scheduled to be held
on Jinuaty 27, 2012
The deferral allowed staff to consult with the Friends of the Rouge Watershed (FRW) to discuss
the various,attributes of the Wetland Restoration Guiding Principles and review their concerns
and questions. On December 6, 2011„ Councillor De Baerernaeker hosted a meeting between
Rouge Park staff, TRCA staff and Friends of the Rouge Watershed to discuss the concerns and
issues with wetland restoration on TRCA lands. The meeting was productive and the included
three major results and direction.
• The TRCA wetland guiding principles for the most part remain unchanged and will be the
standard that NGO's will follow on TRCA lands. Again, the intent of these principles are not
prohibitive but are meant to ensure a common level of standards for all NGO's, similar to
internal TRCA standards. FRW has agreed to respect these rules of engagernent and the
conditions around working on and access to TRCA/Rouge Park properties.
44
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 33 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
• TRCA and Rouge Park agreed to work with FRW to delineate potential ecologically and
hydrologically correct wetland opportunities within the TRCA/Rouge Park properties TRCA
and Rouge Park will assist FRW with the detailed design and overallll prescription for wetland
restoration. The intent Is to detail and delineate a wetland restoration site that can be
independently managed on site by FRW, once final approval of detailed plans have been
approved. Staff has since meet with FRW and has conducted site visits to potential wetland
restoration projects. In addition,to assist in the development of detailed plans TRCA staff is
condLiCti(Ig topographic land surveys of these prellimii:nary wetland restoration sites.
• TRCA and Rouge Park will share construction safety resources (TRCA safety policies and
construction site protocols) and provide training to NGO's to ensure TRCA"s responsibilities
and liabilities under the Occupational Health and Safety Act are niet. Staff has arranged for
a half day workshop for all NGO's to review and detail construction safety procedures and
protocols.
We also agreed that if there were any further issues that Councilor De Baeremaeker would
assist in conflict resolution.
TRCA is a leader in the TRCA jurisdiction in the field of wetland restoration and wetland design,
and is responsible for the construction and implementation of many wetland restoratlon
projects. Through TRCA's operational experience, staff has developed and follows a set of
wetland restoration principles that guide implementation, TRCA's wetland implernentation
projects are always developed by ecological and hydrological site analysis, they conform to the
regulatory requirements of all relevant agencies and are implemented under the scrutiny of
workplace safety requirements, These principles are cornmon, to ail wetland projects delivered
by staff on TRCA property. However, they have not been clearly articulated to non-governrnent
agencies (NGO's) and other agencies,and groups that may be interested in constructing
wetlands on TRCA lands. Endorsement of these principles will ensure that wetland restoration
projects,conducted by NGO's on TRCA lands wilt conforr'n to current standards and practices
employed by TRCA.
Within the TRCA jurisdiction, conservation based NGO's have implemented wetland creation
and restoration projects on Ti RGA-owned lands. Groups like the Ontario Federation of Anglers
and Flunters, Ducks Unlimited and Ontario Streams,as w0 as Rouge Park specific groups
such as The Friends of the Rouge Watershed and 10,000 Trees for the Rouge have constructed
or have expressed interest in irflplernenting wetland projects. The guiding principles will be
appllied to all NGO projects on TRCA land and will ensure wetland development follows Current
and accepted practices of wetland restoration and is consistent with ecological principles and
science.
To assist wetland:: implementation in the ROUgO Park, these guiding principles have been
refined in consultation with Rouge Park and TRCA staff, and were presented to the Rouge Park
Alliance Natural Heritage Committee. These principles support the direction outlined in the
Rouge Park Natural Heritage Committee documents: "Sniall Wetland Management and
Restoration in Rouge Park" and "Vernal Pool Restoration in Rouge Park". These guidelines
were passed by the Rouge Park Natural Heritage Committee at their June 9, 2009 meeting
where TRCA staff presented to the committee the need for proper wetland; design, wetland
construction and outlined the responsibility the TRCA as landowners. The guidelines were once
again presented to the Rouge Park Natural Heritage Corrunittee in Novernber 2011
45
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 34 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
The Rouge Park Alliance reviewed the guidelines and instructed their staff to consult with
NGOs, etc. for final preparation and re-submission to the Alliance for approval. Rouge Park
staff has circulated to Ontario Nature, Ministry of Natural Resources, Friends of the Rouge
Watershed, Toronto Zoo, Ontario Streams and 10,000 Trees for the Rouge Valley. NGO's have
predominantly expressed Support for the guidelines and in a few cases, and have asked for
clarification of technical details related to implementation of sorne techniques. Staff is of the
opinion that these remaining issues would be resolved during site specific design.
The Wetland Restoration Guiding Principles provides a rationale for design decisions and
implementation of wetland projects on TRCA lands and in the Rouge Park. These principles
are not intended to provide detailed design guidelines or prescriptions for restoration of site
specific wetlands and all wetland projects must be consistent with landscape-level wetland
plans outlined in TRCA watershed restoration and Rouge Park plans. The wetlands referred to
in these principles include both permanent and ternporary wetlands of all types, including
marshes, swamps and ephemeral wetlands.
The following guiding principles will ensure that wetland restoration projects on TRCA lands are
planned, designed, irriplemented and nionitored scientifically, and with respect for community
values.
Guiding Principles:
Wetiand Design
1) Wetland restoration projects will be constructed in locations consistent with those identified
in approved Watershed Restoration plans, Rouge Park plans, or other area-specific plans.
Site specific wetland projects that are not specifically referred to in plans but are consistent
with existing plans will be considered based on ecological, merit and whether wetlands were
historically present an the proposed site,
2) Projects will focus on the restoration of previously existing wetlands and natural
hydrological patterns. Wetland restoration techniques should mimic, as closely as possible,
the natural processes of wetland formation that historically occurred on the landscape.
Creation of wetlands by excavation where there is no evidence that wetlands once existed
wiH be undertaken only in exceptional situations where there exists clear, specific wildlife
and ecological management reasons, as determined by TRCA staff, in collaboration with
Rouge Park Alliance and/or other agency staff where appropriate.
4) Conversion of one wetland type to another is to be avoided. For example, ephemeral
wetlands will riot be converted to permanent wetlands, Exceptions might include
circumstances where restoration of natural hydrology (file drain removal, etc.) allows more
perrnanent wetlands or where water is held on the land with very low-head dams along field
ditches or intermittent streams that mimic natural wetland creation processes. Exceptions
may also be made in cases where created wetlands are found not to be functioning as
intended and require adaptive managernent.
40
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 35 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
5) Location of wetlands, particularly small and ephemeral wetlands for which historical
locations may be difficult to determine, must be addressed within,a larger, landscape-level
habitat context and have regard for restoring ecosystem integrity.
6) All wetland proilect proposals will' include detailed designs including Construction drawings,
planting plans, site plans, topographic surveys, etc. that account for regulatory
requirernents, detail interided functions and consider the habitat needs of plants arid'
wildlife. Evaluation measures and a monitoring plan must be in place for alll restored
wetlands to ensure that intended functions are being achieved,
7) All NGO's wetland projects require the review and approval of TRCA and other relevant
approval agencies, and will respect federal, provincial, municipal and TRCA regulations,,
8) Hydrologic and soil assessments must be completed at each proposed wetland site to
011SUre that basin soils are wetland appropriate and impermeable,
9) All restoration projects must ensure that no harm is done to existing natural systeim, native
species, habitats and drainage patterns. in particular, no alteration, of hydrology that
negatively affects existing swan ips will be allowed, given that existing swamps are rare and
very sensitive to changes in hydrology. Wildlife shall not be moved between wetlands
except in the case of targeted reintroduction prograrns endorsed and permitted by all
relevant agencies.
10)All constructed improvements on TRCA lands, regardless of how they are funded, will be
owned by TRCA and their rnanagenient will be the responsibility of the TRCA.
Construction Sites
1) All wetland management proposals that require use of heavy equipment for implementation
must provide detailed safety plan, construction logistics, site plans, including topographical
surveys approved by TRCA and all other required approval agencies,
2) All constructions Sites where heavy equipment is used must be supervised by an
experienced site Supervisor approved by TRCA. (The Ontario Health, and Safety legislation
requires employers, including those contracting for work, to ensure that 'competent'
supervisors are appointed who are (in part) 'qualified through knowledge, training arld
experience'),
3) Alll construction sites where heavy eqUipment is used Ml conform to the applicable TRCA
policies as well as any applicable federal, provincial and Municipal regulations. This
includes having in place approved public, operator and employee safety practices, liability
and other insurance coverage appropriate for the work being done,WSIIB certification and
such other legislative or regulatory requirements as may apply. It is the responsibility of the
project proponent/contractor to ensure compliance with all construction standards,
4) All people attending work sites will wear approved safety equipment and the site supervisor
shall be responsible for ensuring compliance.
47
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 36 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
RATIONALE
The Wetland Restoration Guiding Principles provide clear direction to groups that have a desire
to restore wetlands on TRCA lands. Wetland restoration can be an activity that has long lasting
impacts on TRCA pro,perty. These principles were developed to reduce risk and ensure
agencies conform to current and acceptable practices of wetland restoration. The principles
focus on the ecological ands hydrological appropriateness of restoration projects, wetland
design standards and construction standards for implementation. These guidelines are not
prohibitive, they provide direction for NGO's to conform to a standard of wetland restoration,
practices that are currently used by Restoration Services staff of the TRCA.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The Wetland Restoration Guiding Principles will be presented for endorsement to the Rouge
Park Alliance at the December 9, 2011, meeting. After TRCA and Rouge Park Alliance approval
our NGO project partners wild be notified and the wetland restoration guiding principles be
applied to TRCA-owned and managed lands
Report prepared by: Gerd MacPherson, extension 5246
Emails: gmacphersongtr,ca.on.ca
For Information contact: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246
Emails: gmacpherson@tirca.on.ca
Date: November 07,2011
48
ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE Page 37 of 37
MINUTES of Meeting #2112,April 20,2012
10. Correspondence
KEY ISSUE
Rouge Park Alliance correspondence.
NO TE:
Correspondence#10.4 was brought forward and received under Res.#15/12.
MOTION: Moved by: Brian Denney
Res.#27/12: Seconded by: Jack Heath
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance receive the following correspondence:
1. Letter dated February 17, 2012 to Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance,from Councillor Ron Moeser,City
of Toronto,Ward 44, re:Alan Wells.
2. Letter dated February 28, 2012 to Mike Bender, Rouge Park Alliance,from Jeff Surtees,Trout
Unlimited Canada, re:April 24, 2012 Event- Launch of the Duffins Creek Watershed Renewal
Program.
3. Letter dated March 29, 2012 to Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance,from The Honourable Peter kent,
Minister of the Environment and Minister Responsible for Parks Canada, re: Federal Commitment
Towards the Establishment of Rouge National Urban Park in the GTA.
4. Letter dated April 2, 2012 to Chair Alan Wells, Rouge Park Alliance,from The Hon. Michael Chong,
MP, re: March 29, 2012 Budget Announcement- Reconfirmed Commitment of the Government of
Canada to Establish a National Urban Park in the Rouge Valley.
5. Email dated April 16, 2012 to Alan Wells from Andy McKinnon, re: Items Regarding the Rouge Park
Trails Master Plan (agenda item #2), and Restoration Areas (agenda item #6).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
11. New Business
Deputy Mayor Jack Heath informed the Alliance that Markham Council on April 17,2012 received the"Multi
Use Pathway from 16th Avenue to Bob Hunter Memorial Park - Class Environmental Assessment"report,and
endorsed the preferred alignments for multi use pathway as described in the report.
TERMINATION
The meeting terminated at 12:25 p.m. on April 20,2012.
Alan Wells Mike Bender
Chair, Rouge Park Alliance Acting General Manager, Rouge Park