HomeMy WebLinkAboutAuthority 2013 Toronto and Region
Conservation
Authority
MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY#1/13
February 22, 2013
The Authority Meeting Annual #1/13, was held in the Weston Theatres, Black Creek
Pioneer Village, on Friday, February 22, 2013. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the
meeting to order at 10:34 a.m.
PRESENT
Paul Ainslie Member
Maria Augimeri Vice Chair
Ben Cachola Member
Bob Callahan Member
Raymond Cho Member
Ronald Chopowick Member
Vincent Crisanti Member
Glenn De Baeremaeker Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Chris Fonseca Member
Jack Heath Member
Colleen Jordan Member
Mujeeb Khan Member
Gloria Lindsay Luby Member
Glenn Mason Member
Mike Mattos Member
Peter Milczyn Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair
John Parker Member
Anthony Perruzza Member
Deb Schulte Member
John Sprovieri Member
Cynthia Thorburn Member
Jim Tovey Member
Richard Whitehead Member
ABSENT
David Barrow Member
Linda Pabst Member
Dave Ryan Member
1
RES.#A1/13 - MINUTES
Moved by: Maria Augimeri
Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #11/12, held on January 25, 2013, be approved.
CARRIED
PRESENTATIONS
(a) A presentation by William Boyle, Chief Executive Officer, Harbourfront Centre Exhibit in
regard to item AUTH7.1 - Harbourfront Centre Partnership.
(b) A presentation in regard to item AUTH7.2 -Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Strategic Plan.
RES.#A2/13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: Paul Ainslie
Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT above-noted presentation (a) be received.
CARRIED
RES.#A3/13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti
THAT above-noted presentation (b) be received.
CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#A4/13 - HARBOURFRONT CENTRE PARTNERSHIP
A partnership with Harbourfront Centre to deliver new pilot environmental
education projects.
Moved by: Paul Ainslie
Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
2
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority(TRCA) and Harbourfront Centre
have partnered, incorporating the talents and resources of both organizations, to deliver
two unique educational initiatives for the creative delivery of public environmental
education, inclusive of implementing a high profile public art project, and conducting a
nature-based youth camp program and waterfront event for children;
WHEREAS TRCA and Harbourfront Centre have been able to obtain private funding for a
new public art project on the Toronto waterfront, and developed an agreed
revenue-sharing model for the children youth camp initiative;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the new partnership between Harbourfront
Centre and TRCA be endorsed and that staff be directed to complete the agreements to
coordinate the implementation of the two key education projects, and to financially
manage the resources for successful project completion as set out in the staff report.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
TRCA is embarking on an exciting, new working partnership with Harbourfront Centre. Located
on a 10 acre site on Toronto-s waterfront, Harbourfront Centre is an innovative non-profit
organization that provides renowned programming in the arts, culture, education and recreation
all within a wide variety of venues.
Our joint initiatives include, first, an outdoor public art and environmental education display
located in the heart of the harbourfront; and the second is a unique nature-based joint
overnight summer camp program and eco-day event oriented for children and youth in the City
of Toronto. This report provides a brief synopsis of the current status of these two creative new
projects, which blend the skills of both Harbourfront Centre and TRCA staff in project
implementation, and capitalize on the reputation and client market share that both agencies
bring to the assignment success. Both projects are described below.
1. Public Art Outdoor Exhibit
The first joint project with Harbourfront Centre focuses on the design and installation of a bold
new public art project at their waterfront location.
Four years ago, Harbourfront Centre built the largest outdoor photographic exhibit in Canada,
located along the harbour promenade. The first exhibit was on Canada's Boreal Forest,
receiving financial assistance from both the Government of Canada and the Province of
Ontario. The second year highlighted the richness of the Greenbelt; and last year's exhibit
entitled 'Uncharted Waters', investigated Toronto's harbour and the Port Authority activities.
These exhibits were totally funded by the Ontario Greenbelt Foundation and the Toronto Port
Authority, respectively. Many of the images for this exhibit included large scale photos that
were taken with TRCA staff assistance, highlighting TRCA's work in locations around the
harbour.
The Harbourfront Centre design team advocate that environmental issues and ideas can
educate and be brought forward to the public eye as engaging, provocative images, with
underlying messages, as opposed to traditional forms of nature appreciation and education.
The team of artists were thrilled with the participation of TRCA staff who took the photographers
to places of special interest and key sites where conservation work was being carried out in
locations that were not known to the general public.
3
The Proposal
These past outdoor exhibits at Harbourfront Centre have been so well received by the public
that Harbourfront Centre staff is planning a new 2-year exhibit featuring the rivers of Toronto
and the region. The proposed first-year exhibition concept is entitled 'Nine Rivers City', and is
targeted to open at the site of two new urban waterfront parks located adjacent to the
Harbourfront Centre head office at 235 Queen's Quay West. Year two exhibition will be
completely different with different artists and is still under discussion with TRCA.
For both exhibits, TRCA will assist several artists in telling the story of the rivers and watersheds
through site visits, operational shadowing and city/river explorations. The photography
sessions, for year one, commenced in the late fall 2012 and will continue throughout this year.
In June 2013, coinciding with the opening of Nine Rivers City, Harbourfront Centre will launch
two new major public squares at the center of its waterfront site: Canada Square fronting on
Lake Ontario and Ontario Square facing a revitalized Queens Quay Boulevard. More than 10
years in the making and replacing a surface parking lot which has now become a 300 space
underground garage, the two squares were designed by Michael Van Valkenburgh and
Associates with funding from the Government of Canada and Province of Ontario. Canada
Square will feature an oval design of large scale metasequoia (Redwood) trees and be a
contemplative space by Lake Ontario. Ontario Square encompasses 450 aspen trees and
plantings based on the Boreal Forest and will be an active space for cultural programmes.
Nine Rivers City will be installed in the central space between the two new squares.
An excerpt from Harbourfront Centre's Exhibit description is provided below.
Excerpt:
Areas of Exhibition Focus
Nine Rivers City: Toronto-s Uncommon Waterways will focus on the importance of the nine
rivers which define the greater Toronto region. Through highlighting the visual stories of our
unique rivers system, we hope to engage the public in many of the significant issues which
underlie the protection and conservation of the fragile natural systems which we must rely on
for the future. The exhibition will incorporate people and their personal stories to delve into
many of the complex areas of the rivers system. We hope to project the natural beauty of the
rivers, the complicated history of the natural environment, the reshaping and improving of the
rivers landscape, the working and recreational aspects of the rivers area and how the rivers
system is one of the fundamental structures feeding the current and future natural health of the
Toronto region. Two artists will be asked to concentrate on each of the four theme areas in
order to ensure that the overall exhibition meets the project objectives.
The four general areas of importance that the artists will be asked to explore are:
River History: heritage, cultural, historical, artifacts
Nature and the River: birdlife, fish/streams, conservation, wildlife protection, urban ecology,
fishing, habitat, wildlife management, research,
4
River Landscape: urban forestry, green space and forest restoration, wetland restoration,
green space acquisition, new river corridors,
People of the River: water managers, people from around the world, conservation officers, first
nations, park employees, fisherman,
To help the 6 selected artists get oriented, TRCA senior staff organized an artist/staff workshop
where participants brainstormed potential sites and activities of interest for photo-shoots at
different watershed landscape locations across the TRCA jurisdiction. Staff is arranging the
logistics for the artists around getting out to see archaeological excavation works, monitoring
sites, restoration planting, river remedial construction, park and trail activities and others.
Harbourfront Centre Chief Executive Director, William Boyle and Head of Visual Arts, Patrick
Macauley will lead the project with TRCA and will provide all artistic direction and exhibit
management.
This project is a different twist on how to provide environmental education through a high
profile public art exhibit highlighting the city and its rivers, TRCA's work and people/activities
within the urban watersheds.
2. Joint Education Program for Children/Youth
The second project with Harbourfront Centre focuses on new children-s education programs,
integrating our combined educational staff talents and capitalizing on two outstanding locations
—the waterfront and TRCA-s beautiful Lake St. George Field Centre.
We are developing two key partnership initiatives: a joint art and environment education day in
June at the Harbourfront Centre and an 8-week summer camp at Lake St. George.
Lake St. George Field Centre Camps
Harbourfront Centre is offering eight weeks of overnight summer camps for youth age 8 to 14 at
Lake St. George Field Centre. Camp themes are linked to the unique natural features and
programming available at Lake St. George and will be delivered by both TRCA and
Harbourfront Centre staff. For 2013, camp programs include:
• Eco Explorers Camp (Ages 8 - 12);
• Camp Adventure (Ages 9 - 11);
• Leadership Camp (Ages 12 - 14).
A first year target of 25 campers per week has been set, with a plan to grow participation in the
camp in future years.
Camp programming will build on the strengths and expertise of both TRCA and Harbourfront
Centre and provide new opportunities to engage youth from Toronto in outdoor experiences at
TRCA education centres.
5
Eco-Day 2013
On June 3, 2013, TRCA and Harbourfront Centre will launch the first Eco-Day at the
Harbourfront Centre. Co-programmed by TRCA and the Harbourfront Centre, this special event
will engage 300 students from 10 classes within Toronto and provide a range of environmental
and water-themed programming. TRCA and Harbourfront Centre staff are currently finalizing
program details, including elements of a Children's Water Festival in partnership with the
Children's Water Education Council, and a proposed partnership with the Greenbelt
Foundation.
The Eco-Day at Harbourfront Centre will provide TRCA with an expanded education presence
within the City of Toronto, engage students on the waterfront, and provide a model for future
education collaboration at the Harbourfront Centre.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for the Harbourfront Centre/TRCA two year art exhibition project has been provided by
a major sponsorship from Menkes Development and additional support from Epson and SAJO
Inc. as well as the staff resources of Harbourfront Centre and TRCA.
For the education program, Harbourfront Centre and TRCA organizers have put in place a
revenue sharing model whereby TRCA is recovering a per camper fee based on TRCA's regular
Field Centre overnight camp fees for the summer camp program, and a per student cost
recovery for TRCA programs related to the Eco-Day.
Report prepared by: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214
Emails: cwoodland @trca.on.ca, dgray @trca.on.ca
For information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214, Darryl Gray, 416-791-0327
Emails: cwoodland @trca.on.ca, dgray @trca.on.ca
Date: February 5, 2013
RES.#A5/13 - TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY STRATEGIC
PLAN
2013 Update. Review and further discussion of the draft 2013 Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority strategic plan.
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority(TRCA) staff has developed an
update to the TRCA strategic plan to set the strategic directions for TRCA for the next ten
years;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the draft 2013 TRCA strategic plan be reviewed
by the Authority and further discussed at Authority Meeting #2/13, scheduled to be held
on March 22, 2013.
CARRIED
6
BACKGROUND
Moving Toward The Living City, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority strategic plan,
was approved by the Authority in 2006. The plan set the direction for TRCA to work towards
The Living City vision:
The quality of life on Earth is being determined in rapidly expanding city regions. Our
vision is for a new kind of community, The Living City, where human settlement can
flourish forever as part of natures beauty and diversity.
Moving Toward The Living City described how TRCA would build on its traditional strengths to
help the Toronto region respond to critical issues such as climate change, the environmental
footprint of the city region and a changing economy. TRCA would continue its tradition of
strong water management, biodiversity, recreation and education programs, while providing
sustainability leadership and assistance in other areas to help put the region on a more
sustainable path.
Seven years later, TRCA has contributed significantly to regional sustainability while continuing
to build its core programs. However, TRCA, the region, and the world have evolved. It is time
to update the strategic directions of TRCA to ensure that it remains relevant and effective. The
2013 TRCA strategic plan sets the direction for TRCA to maximize its contributions towards the
ongoing development of a sustainable city region.
RATIONALE
Staff, under the direction of the CEO, has developed the draft strategic plan over a period of
several months. More than 70 staff members contributed directly to the plans development,
and still other TRCA staff, staff from partner municipalities and outside experts were consulted.
The planning process included assessment of TRCA and its current programs, the priorities of
its municipal partners, conditions within and outside the region, and changes we may
anticipate over the next decades. The outcome was the identification of twelve priority
strategies for TRCA and key actions supporting each strategy that will guide TRCA work for the
next decade.
The 2013 strategic plan, in identifying TRCA-s most important strategic directions and priority
actions, will align TRCA to a common purpose. It will increase efficiency, prevent redundancy
and facilitate internal cooperation, which are increasingly important given the growth within
TRCA. It will also promote a culture of strategic thinking and innovation within TRCA, to ensure
that we continually consider the lasting value TRCA must provide to our partners and the
communities we serve.
Finalizing the 2013 strategic plan is only the first step toward putting it into practice. Building
on the success of a staff-centred planning process, the plans implementation will involve staff
from across TRCA groups and divisions. Together, staff will monitor, evaluate and report on
TRCA's actions internally and to our partners, and adjust TRCA's strategies as required to
reflect lessons learned and new information. TRCA will also completely review the plan within
five years and make long-term course corrections as needed.
7
NEXT STEPS
The draft 2013 strategic plan is now ready for review and input from the Authority, and staff is
ready to begin implementation immediately upon its completion. The Authority will receive the
draft plan at this meeting and will be introduced to its content by the CEO and staff. It is
requested that Members review the draft plan over the next month and participate in a
structured discussion at the March 22, 2013 Authority meeting to provide comment.
Report prepared by: Ryan Ness, extension 5615
Emails: rness @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Brian Denney, 416-667-6290, Ryan Ness, extension 5615
Emails: bdenney @trca.on.ca, rness @trca.on.ca
Date: January 28, 2013
RES.#A6/13 - APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS
The Conservation Authorities Act requires each conservation authority to
undergo an external audit of its accounts and transactions each year.
Moved by: Jim Tovey
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT Grant Thornton LLP be appointed auditors of Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) for the year 2013, in accordance with section 38 of the Conservation
Authorities Act.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Section 38 of the Conservation Authorities Act reads as follows:
38. (1) Every authority shall cause its accounts and transactions to be audited
annually by a person licensed under the Public Accountancy Act . R.S.O.
1990, c. C.27, s. 38 (1).
(2) No person shall be appointed as auditor of an authority who is or during the
preceding year was a member of the authority or who has or during the
preceding year had any direct or indirect interest in any contract or any
employment with the authority other than for services within his or her
professional capacity. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27, s. 38 (2).
(3) An authority shall, upon receipt of the auditors report of the examination of its
accounts and transactions, forthwith forward a copy of the report to each
participating municipality and to the Minister. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27, s. 38 (3).
At Authority Meeting #8/10, held on October 29, 2010, Resolution #A182/10 was approved, in
part, as follows:
8
THAT the contract for Audit Services be awarded to Grant Thornton at an initial annual
cost not to exceed $46,725.00, plus applicable taxes for 2010 and an annual increase of
two to four per cent for the following four years, for Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) and The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto (CFGT);
THAT, pursuant to Section 38 of the Conservation Authorities Act, the firm of Grant
Thornton be appointed auditors of TRCA, effective November 1, 2010;
THAT the term of the engagement be for five years subject to annual appointments by the
Authority based on satisfactory performance; ...
RATIONALE
Grant Thornton LLP has been appointed TRCA's auditor since 2004, following a competition for
audit services conducted in the summer of 2004 and the summer of 2010. Although the
contract period is for five years starting with 2010, the annual reappointment is subject to
performance satisfactory to TRCA. Staff is pleased to report that the most recent audit was
completed to its satisfaction and it anticipates similar performance for 2013.
Staff recommends the reappointment of Grant Thornton LLP for the 2013 audit year, as
required by the Rules of Conduct.
Report prepared by: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232
Emails: rsgambelluri @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232
Emails: rsgambelluri @trca.on.ca
Date: February 13, 2013
RES.#A7/13 - FRENCHMAN-S BAY HARBOUR ENTRANCE PROJECT EAST
BREAKWATER CONSTRUCTION
Contracts RSD13-006, RSD13-011 and RSD13-012. Award of Contracts
RSD13-006, RSD13-011 and RSD13-012 for the supply and delivery of
approximately 8,790 tonnes of 3-5 tonne armour stone , approximately
9,320 tonnes of 400-600mm rip-rap stone and approximately 7,800
tonnes of 100-200mm gabion stone, in support of the Frenchman-s Bay
Harbour Entrance Project, City of Pickering.
Moved by: Jim Tovey
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
9
THAT Contract RSD13-006 for the supply and delivery of approximately 8,790 tonnes of
3-5 tonne armour stone to the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Project East
Breakwater, in the City of Pickering, be awarded to C.D.R. Young-s Aggregates Inc. for a
total unit price of$45.94 per tonne and a total cost not to exceed $403,812.60, plus a
contingency amount of 25% to be expended as authorized by Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bidder meeting TRCA
specifications;
THAT Contract RSD13-011 for the supply and delivery of approximately 9,320 tonnes of
400-600mm rip-rap stone to the Frenchman-s Bay Harbour Entrance Project East
Breakwater, in the City of Pickering, be awarded to TBG Landscape Inc. for a total unit
price of$26.62 per tonne and a total cost not to exceed $248,098.40, plus a contingency
amount of 25%to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the lowest
bidder meeting TRCA specifications;
THAT Contract RSD13-012 for the supply and delivery of approximately 7,800 tonnes of
100-200mm gabion stone to the Frenchman-s Bay Harbour Entrance Project East
Breakwater, in the City of Pickering, be awarded to Glenn Windrem Trucking for a total
unit price of$22.75 per tonne and a total cost not to exceed $177,450.00, plus a
contingency amount of 25% to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it
being the lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications;
THAT should staff be unable to achieve an acceptable contract with the awarded
suppliers, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the
other suppliers that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest compliant bidder;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take all necessary actions
to implement the foregoing, including the signing and execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 2008, the City of Pickering working in partnership with TRCA, initiated the Frenchman-s Bay
Harbour Entrance Class Environmental Assessment (EA). The purpose of this project is to
create a safe harbour entrance that supports the marine function of the Bay, while preserving or
enhancing the ecological conditions. Through the EA process, the preferred design was
developed that consisted of two breakwater structures running perpendicular from the east and
west spits of the harbour entrance, thus improving navigability. The breakwaters are
approximately 200 metres in length and are constructed of various types of aggregate material.
The following aggregates will be required to construct the east breakwater:
• approximately 8,790 tonnes of 3-5 tonne armour stone;
• approximately 9,320 tonnes of 400-600mm rip- rap stone; and
• approximately 7,800 tonnes of 100-200mm gabion stone.
RATIONALE
Tender packages were sent to 13 suppliers as follows:
• Brock Aggregates;
• C.D.R. Youngs Aggregates Inc;
• Coco Aggregates;
10
• Glenn Windrem Trucking;
• J.C. Rock Ltd;
• BOT Aggregates;
• Miller Paving Ltd.;
• Nelson Aggregate Co.;
• R.W. Tomlinson Ltd.;
• Strada Aggregates;
• Mery Johnston;
• B-Town group;and
• TBG Landscape Inc.
Tenders RSD13-006, RSD13-011 and RSD13-012 were publicly advertised on the electronic
procurement website Biddingo (http://www.biddingo.com/) on Friday, January 11, 2013. The
Tender Opening Committee opened tenders on Friday, February 1, 2013 with the following
results:
Contract RSD13-006 - Supply and Delivery of Approximately 8,790 tonnes of 3-5
tonne Armour Stone
TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL VALUE OF
BIDDERS PER TONNE CONTRACT
(Plus HST) (Plus HST)
C.D.R. Youngs Aggregates Inc. $45.94 $403,812.60
J.C. Rock Ltd. $47.00 $413,130.00
Glenn Windrem Trucking $47.50 $417,525.00
Contract RSD13-011 - Supply and Delivery of Approximately 9,320 tonnes of
400-600mm Rip-Rap Stone
TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL VALUE OF
BIDDERS PER TONNE CONTRACT
(Plus HST) (Plus HST)
TBG Landscape Inc. $26.62 $248,098.40
Glenn Windrem Trucking $26.90 $250,708.00
Miller Paving Ltd. $27.25 $253,970.00
Contract RSD13-012 - Supply and Delivery of Approximately 7,800 tonnes of
100-200mm Gabion Stone
TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL VALUE OF
BIDDERS PER TONNE CONTRACT
(Plus HST) (Plus HST)
Glenn Windrem Trucking $22.75 $177,450.00
Miller Paving Ltd. $23.30 $181,740.00
C.D.R. Youngs Aggregates $23.80 $185,640.00
11
Based on the bids received, staff recommends that C.D.RYoung s Aggregates be awarded
Contract RSD13-006 for the supply and delivery of approximately 8,790 tonnes of 3-5 tonne
armour stone for the unit cost of$45.94 per tonne and a total amount not to exceed
$403,812.60, plus HST; staff recommends that TBG Landscape Inc. be awarded Contract
RSD13-011 for the supply and delivery of approximately 9,320 tonnes of 400-600mm rip-rap
stone for the unit cost of$26.62 per tonne and a total cost not to exceed $248,098.40, plus
HST; staff recommends that Glenn Windrem Trucking be awarded Contract RSD13-012 for the
supply and delivery of approximately 7,800 tonnes of 100-200mm gabion stone for the unit cost
of$22.75 per tonne and a total amount not to exceed $177,450.00, plus HST; they being the
lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications for each contract. Each contract is subject to a 25%
contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds to undertake the Frenchman-s Bay Harbour Entrance Project are 100% recoverable from
the City of Pickering, further to the Memorandum of Understanding.
Report prepared by: Jordan Budway, 416-392-9721
Emails:jbudway @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702
Emails:jdickie @trca.on.ca
Date: February 04, 2013
RES.#A8/13 - SALARY GRID FOR HOURLY WORKERS
Amendment. Introduction of salary range for skilled labourers.
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Bob Callahan
THAT the creation of a third salary range at Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
(TRCA) for skilled labourers, in recognition of the increase in skills needed, be approved.
CARRIED
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES.#A9/13 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
Moved by: Glenn Mason
Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan
THAT Section II items EX8.1 & EX8.2, contained in Executive Committee Minutes#12/12,
held on February 1, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
12
Section II Items EX8.1 & EX8.2
MEADOWCLIFFE DRIVE SLOPE STABILIZATION PROJECT
(Executive Res.#B203/12)
YONGE-YORK MILLS FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL- REACH 2 CONCRETE REPAIR PROJECT
(Executive Res.#B204/12)
ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
RES.#A10/13 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 166/06
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06 items EX10.1 - EX10.55, inclusive, contained in Executive
Committee Minutes #12/12, held on February 1, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
13
ANNUAL/INAUGURAL MEETING
APPOINTMENTS TO TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY FOR
2013-2014
The Secretary-Treasurer can advise that all the persons listed below have been duly appointed
and are entitled to sit as Members of this Authority for the 2013-2014 year, or until their
successors are appointed.
ADJALA-TOSORONTIO/MONO Glenn Mason
DURHAM Colleen Jordan
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Dave Ryan
TORONTO Paul Ainslie
Maria Augimeri
Ben Cachola
Raymond Cho
Ronald Chopowick
Vincent Crisanti
Glenn De Baeremaeker
Mujeeb Khan
Gloria Lindsay Luby
Mike Mattos
Peter Milczyn
John Parker
Anthony Perruzza
Cynthia Thorburn
PEEL Bob Callahan
Chris Fonseca
John Sprovieri
Jim Tovey
Richard Whitehead
YORK David Barrow
Michael Di Biase
Jack Heath
Linda Pabst
Deborah Schulte
14
RES.#A11/13 - APPOINTMENT OF SCRUTINEERS
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Chris Fonseca
THAT Mr. Paul Speck, Senior Vice President, AON Reed Stenhouse and Mr. Robert
Rossow, Partner, Gardiner Roberts LLP, be appointed as scrutineers for the election of
officers, if required.
CARRIED
CHAIR OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
Gerri Lynn O'Connor was nominated by Maria Augimeri.
RES.#Al2/13 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Vincent Crisanti
THAT nominations for the office of Chair of the Authority be closed.
CARRIED
Gerri Lynn O'Connor was declared elected by acclamation as Chair of Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority.
VICE CHAIR OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
Maria Augimeri was nominated by Glenn De Baeremaeker.
RES.#A13/13 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS
Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT nominations for the office of Vice Chair of the Authority be closed.
CARRIED
Maria Augimeri was declared elected by acclamation as Vice Chair of Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority.
15
REGION OF DURHAM REPRESENTATIVE ON THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Colleen Jordan was nominated by Gerri Lynn O'Connor.
RES.#A14/13 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS
Moved by: Jack Heath
Seconded by: Jim Tovey
THAT nominations for the Region of Durham representative on the Executive Committee
be closed.
CARRIED
Colleen Jordan was declared elected by acclamation as a Region of Durham representative on
the Executive Committee, for a term to end at Annual Meeting #1/15.
REGION OF PEEL REPRESENTATIVES ON THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Jim Tovey was nominated by Chris Fonseca.
Richard Whitehead was nominated by Chris Fonseca.
RES.#A15/13 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS
Moved by: Bob Callahan
Seconded by: John Sprovieri
THAT nominations for the Region of Peel representatives on the Executive Committee be
closed.
CARRIED
Jim Tovey and Richard Whitehead were declared elected by acclamation as the Region of
Peel representatives on the Executive Committee, for a term to end at Annual Meeting #1/15.
REGION OF YORK REPRESENTATIVES ON THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Jack Heath was nominated by Michael Di Biase.
Michael Di Biase was nominated by Glenn De Baeremaeker.
RES.#A16/13 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS
Moved by: Paul Ainslie
Seconded by: Chris Fonseca
16
THAT nominations for the Region of York representatives on the Executive Committee be
closed.
CARRIED
Jack Heath and Michael Di Biase were declared elected by acclamation as the Region of York
representatives on the Executive Committee, for a term to end at Annual Meeting # 1/15.
CITY OF TORONTO REPRESENTATIVES ON THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Ronald Chopowick was nominated by Cynthia Thorburn.
Ben Cachola was nominated by Maria Augimeri.
Gloria Lindsay Luby was nominated by Jack Heath.
Anthony Perruzza was nominated by Michael Di Biase.
Glenn De Baeremaeker was nominated by Michael Di Biase.
Mike Mattos was nominated by Ben Cachola.
RES.#A17/13 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Maria Augimeri
THAT nominations for the City of Toronto representatives on the Executive Committee be
closed.
CARRIED
Glenn De Baeremaeker, Gloria Linday Luby, Ben Cachola, Mike Mattos and Ronald
Chopowick were declared elected by vote as City of Toronto representatives on the Executive
Committee, for a term to end at Annual Meeting # 1/15.
REGION OF DURHAM REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BUDGET/AUDIT ADVISORY BOARD
Dave Ryan was nominated by Gerri Lynn O'Connor.
RES.#A18/13 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS
Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT nominations for the Region of Durham representative on the Budget/Audit Advisory
Board be closed.
CARRIED
17
Dave Ryan was declared elected by acclamation as the Region of Durham representative on
the Budget/Audit Advisory Board, for a term to end at Annual Meeting #1/15.
REGION OF PEEL REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BUDGET/AUDIT ADVISORY BOARD
Bob Callahan was nominated by John Sprovieri.
RES.#A19/13 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS
Moved by: Chris Fonseca
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT nominations for the Region of Peel representative on the Budget/Audit Advisory
Board be closed.
CARRIED
Bob Callahan was declared elected by acclamation as the Region of Peel representative on
the Budget/Audit Advisory Board, for a term to end at Annual Meeting #1/15.
REGION OF YORK REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BUDGET/AUDIT ADVISORY BOARD
David Barrow was nominated by Michael Di Biase.
RES.#A20/13 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS
Moved by: Maria Augimeri
Seconded by: Jack Heath
THAT nominations for the Region of York representative on the Budget/Audit Advisory
Board be closed.
CARRIED
David Barrow was declared elected by acclamation as the Region of York representative on
the Budget/Audit Advisory Board, for a term to end at Annual Meeting #1/15.
CITY OF TORONTO REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BUDGET/AUDIT ADVISORY BOARD
Maria Augimeri was nominated by Gerri Lynn O'Connor.
18
RES.#A21/13 - MOTION TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS
Moved by: Glenn Mason
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT nominations for the City of Toronto representative on the Budget/Audit Advisory
Board be closed.
CARRIED
Maria Augimeri was declared elected by acclamation as the City of Toronto representative on
the Budget/Audit Advisory Board, for a term to end at Annual Meeting #1/15.
RES.#A22/13 - DESTRUCTION OF BALLOTS
Moved by: Maria Augimeri
Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT any ballots used in the election of officers at Annual Meeting #1/13, be destroyed.
CARRIED
PRESENTATIONS
(a) Years of Service Awards to Jack Heath, John Parker and Anthony Perruzza.
RES.#A23/13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: Maria Augimeri
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT above-noted presentation (a) to Jack Heath, John Parker and Anthony Perruzza for
six years of service to TRCA be received.
CARRIED
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:20 p.m., on Friday, February 22, 2013.
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/ks
19
Toronto and Region
Conservation
Authority
MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY#2/13
March 22, 2013
The Authority Meeting #2/13, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village,
on Friday, March 22, 2013. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at
9:51 a.m.
PRESENT
David Barrow Member
Ben Cachola Member
Raymond Cho Member
Ronald Chopowick Member
Vincent Crisanti Member
Glenn De Baeremaeker Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Chris Fonseca Member
Jack Heath Member
Colleen Jordan Member
Mujeeb Khan Member
Gloria Lindsay Luby Member
Mike Mattos Member
Peter Milczyn Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair
John Parker Member
Anthony Perruzza Member
Dave Ryan Member
Deb Schulte Member
John Sprovieri Member
Jim Tovey Member
ABSENT
Paul Ainslie Member
Maria Augimeri Vice Chair
Bob Callahan Member
Glenn Mason Member
Linda Pabst Member
Cynthia Thorburn Member
Richard Whitehead Member
20
RES.#A24/13 - MINUTES
Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
Seconded by: Chris Fonseca
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/13, held on February 22, 2013, be approved.
CARRIED
DELEGATIONS
(a) A 10 minute delegation by Mr. Ken Hall, Senior Advisor, Public Affairs, Enbridge
Pipelines Inc., speaking in regard to item AUTH7.1 - Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Line 9B
Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project.
(b) A delegation by Mr. Adam Scott, Climate and Energy Program Manager, Environmental
Defence, speaking in regard to item AUTH7.1 - Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Line 9B
Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project.
(c) A delegation by Mr. Gerry Dunn, resident, Toronto, speaking in regard to item AUTH7.1
- Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project.
(d) A delegation by Ms. Taylor Flook, Rising Tide Toronto, and designate, speaking in
regard to item AUTH7.1 - Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity
Expansion Project.
RES.#A25/13 - DELEGATIONS
Moved by: John Parker
Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT Ken Hall be granted an extension to the time allocation for his above-noted
delegation (a).
CARRIED
RES.#A26/13 - DELEGATIONS
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT above-noted delegations (a) - (d) be received.
CARRIED
21
PRESENTATIONS
(b) Years of Service Awards to were presented to TRCA staff.
(b) Scott Fortnum, new Executive Director of The Living City Foundation was introduced.
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#A27/13 - ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC., LINE 9B REVERSAL AND LINE 9B
CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT
Report on Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project and
general areas of concern for crude oil and its potential effect on the
environment and drinking water from spills.
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
WHEREAS concerns of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority(TRCA) related to the
Enbridge Pipelines Incorporated (Enbridge) Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity
Expansion Project(Project)are focused on its role as watershed managers, landowners
and through its obligations under Ontario Regulation 166/06;
AND WHEREAS TRCA has submitted a letter to the National Energy Board (NEB)
commenting on the List of Issues that will be addressed by the board;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT staff continue to consult with affected
municipalities and agencies on common issues and concerns;
THAT staff initiate a dialogue with Enbridge to review issues of concern to TRCA and
determine if an agreement can be reached with Enbridge to address TRCA interests in the
Project;
THAT staff file an application to participate in the NEB Hearing on or before the April 11,
2013 deadline to participate as an Intervenor, thus ensuring that if an agreement with
Enbridge cannot be reached, TRCA can advance its interests through the NEB;
THAT TRCA staff be directed to concurrently negotiate with Enbridge and participate in
the NEB hearing;
THAT if TRCA-s interests are addressed by written agreement with Enbridge by June 30,
2013, that TRCA-s application to participate in the NEB hearing be withdrawn;
AND FURTHER THAT staff continue to work with Enbridge in the implementation of its
Integrity Dig Program to ensure TRCA regulatory requirements are met.
22
RES.#A28/13
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT the proposed amendments below be considered and voted on individually.
CARRIED
AMENDMENT#1
RES.#A29/13
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT the second last paragraph of the main motion be amended to read:
THAT if TRCA-s interests are addressed by written agreement with Enbridge, that TRCA
staff report back to the Authority;
RECORDED VOTE
David Barrow Yea
Ben Cachola Yea
Ronald Chopowick Yea
Glenn De Baeremaeker Yea
Michael Di Biase Yea
Chris Fonseca Yea
Jack Heath Yea
Colleen Jordan Yea
Mujeeb Khan Yea
Gloria Lindsay Luby Yea
Mike Mattos Yea
Peter Milczyn Yea
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Yea
John Parker Nay
Dave Ryan Yea
Deb Schulte Yea
John Sprovieri Yea
Jim Tovey Yea
AMENDMENT#2
RES.#A30/13
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT the following be added after the main motion:
THAT TRCA request that Enbridge release publicly the most up-to-date data on the
integrity of Line 9 Pipeline prior to June 1, 2013
23
RECORDED VOTE
David Barrow Yea
Ben Cachola Yea
Ronald Chopowick Nay
Glenn De Baeremaeker Yea
Michael Di Biase Yea
Chris Fonseca Yea
Jack Heath Yea
Colleen Jordan Yea
Mujeeb Khan Yea
Gloria Lindsay Luby Nay
Mike Mattos Yea
Peter Milczyn Nay
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Nay
John Parker Nay
Dave Ryan Nay
Deb Schulte Yea
John Sprovieri Nay
Jim Tovey Yea
AMENDMENT#3
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT the following be added after the main motion:
THAT TRCA requests that the Ontario Ministry of the Environment order a strategic
environmental assessment of the project to ensure adequate public participation in
decision making, more detailed assessment of ecological risks to TRCA watersheds,
review of emergency monitoring and response procedures, and a full understanding of
the additional risks; including risks resulting from shipping diluted bitumen at potentially
higher temperatures, pressures and volumes
RECORDED VOTE
David Barrow Nay
Ben Cachola Yea
Ronald Chopowick Nay
Glenn De Baeremaeker Yea
Michael Di Biase Nay
Chris Fonseca Nay
Jack Heath Nay
Colleen Jordan Yea
Mujeeb Khan Nay
Gloria Lindsay Luby Nay
Mike Mattos Nay
Peter Milczyn Nay
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Nay
24
RECORDED VOTE Cont'd
John Parker Nay
Dave Ryan Nay
Deb Schulte Yea
John Sprovieri Nay
Jim Tovey Yea
AMENDMENT#1 WAS CARRIED
AMENDMENT#2 WAS CARRIED
AMENDMENT#3 WAS NOT CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
THE RESULTANT MOTION READS AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS concerns of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority(TRCA) related to the
Enbridge Pipelines Incorporated (Enbridge) Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity
Expansion Project(Project)are focused on its role as watershed managers, landowners
and through its obligations under Ontario Regulation 166/06;
AND WHEREAS TRCA has submitted a letter to the National Energy Board (NEB)
commenting on the List of Issues that will be addressed by the board;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT staff continue to consult with affected
municipalities and agencies on common issues and concerns;
THAT staff initiate a dialogue with Enbridge to review issues of concern to TRCA and
determine if an agreement can be reached with Enbridge to address TRCA interests in the
Project;
THAT staff file an application to participate in the NEB Hearing on or before the April 11,
2013 deadline to participate as an Intervenor, thus ensuring that if an agreement with
Enbridge cannot be reached, TRCA can advance its interests through the NEB;
THAT TRCA staff be directed to concurrently negotiate with Enbridge and participate in
the NEB hearing;
THAT if TRCA-s interests are addressed by written agreement with Enbridge, that TRCA
staff report back to the Authority;
THAT staff continue to work with Enbridge in the implementation of its Integrity Dig
Program to ensure TRCA regulatory requirements are met;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA request that Enbridge release publicly the most up-to-date
data on the integrity of Line 9 Pipeline prior to June 1, 2013.
25
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #9/12, held on November 30, 2012, Resolution #A229/12 regarding
Potential Hazards from Crude Oil Spill was approved.
THAT the staff report on the potential hazards from petroleum pipeline spills on GTA
water supplies be received.
Subsequent to this meeting, at Executive Committee Meeting # 10/12, held on December 7,
2012, Resolution #B185/12 was approved as follows:
THAT staff provide a supplementary report to Authority item AUTH8.1 - Potential Hazards
from Crude Oil Spill from Authority Meeting #9/12, held on November 30, 2012 on the
specific items outlined in the email dated December 7, 2012 and the motion passed by
Toronto Council at its meeting on November 28, 2012;
THAT TRCA request party status to the proceedings at the National Energy Board prior to
the next meeting if timelines require;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA work with City of Toronto and City of Hamilton.
At Authority Meeting # 11/12 held on January 25, 2013, Resolution #A260/12 was approved as
follows:
THAT if timelines do not permit a staff report to the Authority, the TRCA Chair and Chief
Executive Officer be authorized to provide staff with direction, based on legal advice, as
to how to proceed with respect to participation in the NEB Hearing on Enbridge
Pipelines Inc., Line 9B Reversal and Capacity Expansion Project;
AND FURTHER THAT the remainder of the staff report and recommendations be deferred
to Authority Meeting #2/13, scheduled to be held on March 22, 2013.
As referenced in TRCA Resolution #B185/12, the City of Toronto adopted Resolution MM28.22
on November 27, 28 and 29 as follows:
1. City Council request the City Solicitor to report directly to City Council on the
following in connection with the Enbridge Pipelines Inc. submission of
pre-application materials to the National Energy Board for the reversal of the direction
of flow of its pipeline, Line 9B, between Westover (near Hamilton) and Montreal, and
to increase the capacity of Line 9:
a) The process at the National Energy Board and options for City of Toronto
participation;
b) Available details respecting the integrity of the pipeline, the safe handling of
diluted bitumen, ("dilbit") and spill contingency measures; and
c) The need for and cost of expert witness or council to represent the City of
Torontos interests.
26
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to advise the National Energy Board of the
City of Toronto-s intent to preserve all options to participate in the proceedings once
an application has been filed by Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (and subject to the direction
of City Council regarding that participation).
3. City Council request the City Manager to liaise with staff of the City of Hamilton, or
other organizations, with a view to potential cooperation.
(source: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaltemHistory.do?item=2012.MM28.22)
On February 20 and 21, 2013, the City of Toronto adopted the following:
1. City Council direct City staff to continue to review the Enbridge application and any
further supporting materials and attempt to resolve any concerns by requesting
additional information from Enbridge.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to apply to the National Energy Board (NEB)
to allow the City of Toronto to participate in the proceedings either through a written
submission or as an intervenor in relation to any unresolved concerns.
3. City Council direct that the funds as outlined in Confidential Attachment 1 to the
report (February 11, 2013) from the City Solicitor be available to obtain such
assistance as necessary in the opinion of the City Solicitor to represent the City's
interest at the NEB.
4. City Council direct that the City continue to liaise with other municipalities, and
Conservation Authorities to discuss cooperation in the presentation of issues before
the NEB.
5. If the City becomes an intervenor, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to withdraw
the City intervention if issues of concern have been resolved to the satisfaction of the
City Solicitor in consultation with the Environment and Energy Office.
Following the Toronto Council Resolution MM28.22 of November 27-29, the City Solicitor
reported back to Council at their February 20-21, 2013 meeting, noting that the primary areas of
interest are the integrity of the pipeline, the safe handling of dilbit and contingency measures
for any spills. Further to this meeting. City staff has reviewed the List of Issues provided by the
NEB that will be considered at the hearing, and will be providing a response to the NEB.
Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project
Line 9 is an existing 762 mm (30-inch) diameter pipeline operated by Enbridge Pipelines Inc.
(Enbridge). It has a capacity of approximately 240,000 barrels per day (bpd) and extends from
Montreal, Quebec to Sarnia, Ontario. Currently, the pipeline transports light crude oil westward
from areas such as the North Sea, West Africa and the Middle East, as shown on Attachment 1.
27
On November 29, 2012, Enbridge filed an application (# A49446) under section 58 and under
Part IV of the National Energy Board Act (NEB Act). The NEB is an independent federal
regulator established in 1959 to promote safety and security, environmental protection and
economic efficiency in the Canadian public interest within the mandate set by Parliament for the
regulation of pipelines, energy development and trade. The Board reports to Parliament
through the Minister of Natural Resources. The NEB is established under the National Energy
Board Act, which sets out the mandate for the NEB. The Act establishes the NEB's authority in
energy projects as well as determining the regulatory boundaries for making decisions.
The application Enbridge filed with the NEB for the Project asked the Board to approve the Line
9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project, in 2012, including:
• The reversal of the 639 km-long segment of Line 9 between North Westover, Ontario
(near Hamilton) and the Montreal Terminal in Quebec (Line 9B);
• An increase in the annual capacity of the entire Line 9 from Sarnia, Ontario to Montreal
to approximately 47,696 m 3/day (300,000 bpd); and
• A revision to the Line 9 Rules and Regulations Tariff to allow transportation of heavy
crude through Line 9 (although Enbridge expects that light crude oil will continue to be
the major product shipped).
The purpose of the Project is to respond to requests from eastern Canadian refineries to have
access to the growing and less expensive supplies of light and heavy crude oil production from
western Canada and the U.S. Bakken region. The increased capacity will be achieved through
the addition of equipment to inject a drag reducing agent into the crude oil, which reduces the
friction in the pipeline and enables additional volume without increasing the maximum
operating pressure, as well as through the addition of new pumps, high flow impellers (inside
existing pumps), and replacement of station piping and valves, all within existing pump stations
or terminals.
All Project activities will take place within existing Enbridge facilities and right-of-way, with the
exception of some temporary workspace required for a new densitometer facility along the
right-of-way near North Westover Station. Letters advising of the project were sent to
stakeholders, including municipalities and conservation authorities, in May and September
2012. Enbridge received approval from the NEB for reversal of the line from Sarnia to North
Westover (near Hamilton) in 2012.
Subject to receipt of regulatory approvals, in its application to the NEB, Enbridge advised that
the project is scheduled to start in late 2013 and is expected to be completed by mid-2014.
Prior to the start of construction, municipal permits will be obtained for the project, as well as
permits from local conservation authorities where works are located within regulated areas
(none within the TRCA jurisdiction). Detailed information on the application and the process is
available on the NEB-s website at www.neb-one.Qc.ca.
In reviewing the application, the NEB has advised that it will be conducting a public hearing for
the Project. The NEB has advised that its assessment process for the application will include
the following steps:
1. Hearing Order Issued by the NEB, including a List of Issues and Deadlines.
2. Public Comments on the List of Issues.
3. Amendments to List of Issues, if any.
28
4. Applications to Participate either by letter of comment or as an Intervenor.
5. List of Participants released by NEB.
6. Additional Written Evidence submitted by Enbridge.
7. Two rounds of Information Requests to Enbridge from the Intervenors, Second
round used to clarify responses from first round if necessary.
8. Intervenor Written Evidence.
9. Letters of Comment by those participants that requested this form of participation.
10. Information Request from Enbridge or other Intervenors to Intervenors.
11. Enbridges Reply Evidence submitted.
12. Written or Oral Final Argument.
13. Receive NEB Decision (80% of Reasons for Decision are completed by the Board
within 12 weeks following the public hearing).
To date, specific details related to items 1, 2 and 4 have been provided, namely:
Item 1. Hearing Order was issued by the NEB on February 19, 2013. Details of hearing
process are more completely defined in Hearing Order OH-002-2013 and legal
counsels memorandum.
Item 2. As part of the Hearing Order, the NEB identified the List of Issues that will be
considered by the NEB, including:
1. The need for the proposed Project.
2. The potential commercial impacts of the proposed project.
3. The appropriateness of the tolling methodology.
4. The potential environmental and socio-economic effects of the proposed
Project, including the potential effects of malfunctions or accidents that may
occur, and any cumulative environmental effects that are likely to result from
the proposed Project.
5. The engineering design and integrity of the proposed Project.
6. The safety, security and contingency planning associated with the
constriction and operation of the proposed Project, including emergency
response planning and third-party damage prevention.
7. Consultation with Aboriginal groups and the potential impacts of the
proposed project in Aboriginal interests.
8. Consultation with affected landowners and potential impacts of the proposed
Project on affected landowners and land uses.
9. The terms and conditions, related to the above issues, to be included in any
approval the Board may issue for the proposed Project.
Public comments on the List of Issues were due March 21, 2013. TRCA staff
prepared a response to the NEB in consultation with its legal counsel, as well as
counsel for the City of Toronto. TRCA's response was based on its interests in
the Project related to its role as watershed managers, land owners and
regulators, including watershed and environmental matters, as well its interests
as a major watershed-wide landowner in the vicinity of, and immediately
downstream of, the Project.
29
Item 4. Applications to Participate in either of two ways:
a) Wite a letter of comment: This method is chosen by interested parties who want
to share their views on a project but not formally participate in a hearing. Letters
of comment will be taken into consideration during the hearing process. They
will not be considered sworn evidence and are not subject to questioning. As a
result, letters of comment may not be given the same weight as sworn evidence
in a hearing, although the weight of the letters depends on a number of factors,
including the content.
b) Become an intervenor: An intervenor is a person or group that has an interest in
a proposed project and would like to formally participate in the hearing,
including landowners, area residents, government agencies, Aboriginal groups,
companies, or any other individual or group. Being an intervenor has financial
implications including evidence preparation, legal fees, travel and
accommodations, and hiring of expert witnesses to testify, if necessary.
Intervenors may present evidence, question other witnesses and give final
arguments during the written and oral portions of the hearing. Intervenors can
also be questioned on any evidence they present.
TRCA has a strong working relationship with Enbridge and acknowledges that its concerns
could be addressed through an agreement with Enbridge. Such an agreement would need to
include a commitment from Enbridge to provide for proactive mitigation and monitoring
activities and reports for the lifespan of the pipe itself, as well address issues related to liability
in the event of a spill.
In order to negotiate such an agreement, legal counsel has advised TRCA to file an application
to participate as an Intervenor. In this way, if a negotiated agreement cannot be reached
between TRCA and Enbridge, then TRCA will have the full opportunity to participate in the
hearing, including providing written evidence, asking questions of Enbridge and other
intervenors, and providing final arguments to the board. If a negotiated agreement can be
reached, then TRCA would be able to withdraw its application and advise the NEB that its
issues have been addressed.
The Application to Participate must be submitted to the NEB by April 11, 2013. The application
must detail which method of participation is being sought, either writing a letter of comment or
becoming an Intervenor, as well as key issues of concern for TRCA that are based on the NEB
list of issues (or list of issues as amended pending the consultation), together with supporting
information.
Additional deadlines for items 6 through 13 have been provided by the NEB in the Hearing
Order and are discussed in more detail in the Details of Work to Be Done section, below. The
information given at the hearing will be used to inform the board's decision by allowing both the
company proposing the project and any other interested people or groups a chance to provide
information on the Project and to provide input in support of or against a Project. The decision
on whether or not to approve a project on the basis of public interest is the discretion of the
NEB. The NEB has advised that the decision for this project will be made no later than March
19, 2014.
30
The NEB has advised that while it will be making Participant Funding available for this
proceeding, as a governmental organization, TRCA is not eligible.
RATIONALE
Further to the issues identified in resolution TRCA Executive B185/12, and issues raised by City
Council, TRCA board member Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker identified additional areas of
concern that TRCA staff was asked to address, with the acknowledgement that TRCA would
have to rely on other experts and published information to answer the questions. These
questions, together with their answers, are presented below.
1) Provide an examination of the specific risks of a spill of diluted bitumen.
As shown in Table 1 below, crude oils contain four general types of hydrocarbons: saturates,
aromatics, resins and asphaltics. Light crude oils from conventional sources contain mostly
saturates (e.g., butane, pentane)with some aromatics, while heavy crude contains all four
components in about equal proportions. Line 9B currently carries light crude oil but the
Enbridge proposal, if approved, would allow the shipment of heavy crude oil through the
pipeline. All of the products to be carried in this pipeline are lighter than water. Concern has
been expressed by the public about the potential of the pipeline to carry diluted bitumen or
dilbit- a product of the oil sands. Because dilbit is considered a type of heavy crude oil by the
petroleum industry, it could be legally carried through Line 9B. However, Enbridge has
confirmed that the primary product transported will be light crude oil.
From an environmental perspective, the implications of a spill based on the type of crude oil
carried in the pipe are relatively the same . The chart shows that different types of crude oil
contain similar types of hydrocarbons, but in different proportions. If released to the
environment through a spill, heavy crude oil (including diluted bitumen), will have similar
environmental reactions and clean-up mechanisms as a light crude oil spill. The Line 9B pipe
currently transports light crude oil.
Table 1. Comparison of Crude Oil and Dilbit Chemistry and Characteristics
Heavy Crude Oil Environmental
Molecular Light Crude Oil Reaction
Hydrocarbon Type Weight Toxicity (Diluted Composition (typical)
Bitumen)
Composition
Saturates (e.g., butane, Light Moderate 15-25% 70-90% vapourize, float
Dctane)
Aromatics (e.g., High 15-35% 10-25% vapourize, float
benzene, toluene)
Resins (e.g., Moderate 20-45% 3-5% float, suspend
ayclohexane)
Asphaltics Heavy Low 10-20% 0-5% float, suspend
Source Chandra Mohan Sinnathambi and Norhusna Mohamad Nor,2012 Relationship Between SARA
Fractions and Crude Oil Fouling.Journal of Applied Sciences, 12: 2479-2483.
Hinkle,A; Shin, E.J.; Liberatore, M, Herring,A.M.,and Batzle, M.,2008. Correlating the Chemical and Physical
Properties of a Set of Heavy Oils from around the Vbbrld. Published by the Colorado School of Mines.Available
from: http://crusher.mines.edu/UserFiles/File/CRA/2008/FuelHinkle2007 RFinal%208Mar08.pdf
31
When spilled into turbulent water, heavy crude oil, though lighter than water, can mix with the
sediments and settle in depositional areas in the watercourse. As with all hydrocarbon mixtures,
most of the spilled product will float on the surface of the water, and move quickly downstream.
The lighter components (i.e. saturates and lighter aromatics such as benzene)will also
evaporate, and end up in the air. Light crude oil will behave in a similar manner. Clean-up under
these circumstances is both expensive and lengthy. Booms and skimmers are used to collect
the floating product.
At the Kalamazoo spill described below, much of the submerged oil was recovered through
agitation via high pressure air or water, and collection at the surface with absorbent materials.
Dredging was conducted, but only at large depositional areas. Vacuum methods can also be
effective in cleaning the sediments. Given normal water level fluctuations, submergent,
emergent and terrestrial vegetation are usually impacted by oil floating on the surface of the
water, along with any animals that come into contact with the floating product. Ecosystem
effects are usually due to direct hydrocarbon exposure, such as oiling of waterfowl. Human
health effects are usually the result of inhalation of hydrocarbon vapours, which can lead to
headaches and nausea.
2) Is there evidence that pipelines shipping dilbit could be more likely to spill?
There is no evidence that pipelines used to transport dilbit are more likely to spill. Alberta
Innovates—Technology Futures, completed a project for Alberta Innovates—Energy and
Environment Solutions reviewing the current status on the corrosivity of dilbit in pipelines as
compared to conventional or 'non-oil sands derived=crude oil. This review indicates that the
characteristics of dilbit are not unique and are comparable to conventional crude oils. Based on
a staff review of pipeline engineering reports, pipeline corrosion begins from the outside, and
progresses inwards, since corrosion requires oxygen from the air or groundwater outside the
pipeline. The petroleum products actually inhibit oxidation and corrosion of the inside of the
pipeline.
3) Please include a detailed breakdown of the major chemicals contained in diluted
bitumen, (i.e., Benzene, Toluene, n-hexane, etc.) with information on the human and
environmental effects of these chemicals. Also provide an evaluation of reports on
human health impacts from the spill and acute and chronic exposure to benzene.
Table 1 above provides a summary of dilbit components. Attachment 2 is a table produced by
the United States Centre for Disease Control that provides more detail on some of the major
chemicals in crude oil along with a summary of the potential human health effects. With specific
reference to the Kalamazoo spill, the Michigan Department of Community Health conducted a
follow-up study and issued its results in a November 2010 report titled Acute Effects of the
Enbridge Oil Spill. The study was based on four community surveys along the affected
waterways, 147 health care provider reports on 145 patients and 41 calls placed to the poison
centre. The study identified 320 people and an additional 11 worksite employees who reported
experiencing adverse health effects. Headache, nausea and respiratory effects were the most
common symptoms reported by exposed individuals. The report concluded that these
symptoms were consistent with the published literature regarding potential health effects
associated with crude oil exposure, which include irritation to the eyes, nose and throat, as well
as dizziness and drowsiness. Contact with the skin and eyes may also cause irritation or burns.
More information on environmental effects are provided with the answer to Question 1 above,
and documented with respect to the Kalamazoo spill, described with respect to the answer to
Question 4 below.
32
4) Please provide more detail on the impacts of the Kalamazoo spill, including a
description of the nature of environmental degradation and an estimate of how long
the spill is expected to negatively impact the ecosystem.
On July 25, 2010, a heavy crude oil spill occurred in Marshall, Michigan (near Kalamazoo). In
this instance, a segment of a 30-inch-diameter pipeline (Line 6B), owned and operated by
Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership, ruptured beneath a wetland. The rupture occurred during
the last stages of a planned shutdown and was not discovered or addressed for over 17 hours.
The total release was estimated to be 843,444 US gallons of crude oil. The oil saturated the
surrounding wetlands and flowed into the Talmadge Creek and the Kalamazoo River. Local
residents self-evacuated from their houses, and the environment was negatively affected. About
320 people reported symptoms consistent with crude oil exposure including headache, nausea
and respiratory effects. No fatalities were reported.
As mentioned in the November, 2012 TRCA staff report, the Kalamazoo spill had a significant
effect on the local ecosystem. Over 35 km of watercourse and a wetland were impacted, and
over 4,000 animals required treatment for oil contamination, although none were treated from
exposure to submerged oil. The mixing of some of the hydrocarbons with the sediments in the
riverbed remains an on-going issue. Over two years after the accident, crews are still removing
submerged oil and contaminated soils miles downstream of the release site. However, most of
the Kalamazoo River has been reopened to the public. Only a portion of the Morrow Lake Delta
remains closed as a result of the release.
5) Provide a breakdown of the financial costs of cleanup with description of who was
liable for these expenses.
The total estimated costs for emergency response equipment, resources, personnel, and
professional and regulatory support in connection with the cleanup of oil discharged from Line
6B in Kalamazoo, were about$767 million as of October 31, 2011. Enbridge was liable for all of
these costs, which include an estimated $42 million cost for the Federal governments role in
the cleanup. Costs continue to be incurred for monitoring and on-going sediment remediation.
These costs will also be the responsibility of Enbridge.
6) Provide an assessment of Enbridge's performance with respect to emergency
response and cleanup, drawing from the findings of the NTSB (National Transportation
Safety Board) study into the incident.
The Kalamazoo spill was not identified immediately because of two factors. First, the spill
occurred in a remote wetland area and it took time for the spill to be observed by local
residents. Second, the spill occurred during maintenance of the pipeline and the reduced flow
readings in the leak detection sensors were assumed to be related to an air gap (also known as
a "column separation` ) in the line from the shutdown. Therefore, Enbridge pumped additional
oil into Line 6B during two separate attempts to refill the pipeline. The additional oil put into the
pipeline during these restarts represented over 80 percent of the total release.
33
Enbridge is currently completing a comprehensive Integrity Dig Program of their existing Line 9
pipeline to proactively determine any locations at risk of failure, and repair the sections before a
spill occurs. As required, permits through the TRCA jurisdiction have been issued when the
work is located within a regulated area, or if maintenance works are required on sections of the
pipe that are located within a regulated area. To date, Ontario Regulation 166/06 permits have
been issued by TRCA in relation to this pipeline, including both emergency works and long
term stabilization permits for locations where the pipe was found to be in an unstable location
near Don River wetlands or across the Rouge River. TRCA continues to review and approve
Enbridge's Integrity Dig projects when they are located within the regulated area. Enbridge has
been responsive in these site specific cases in addressing TRCA's regulatory issues.
TRCA does not have a direct role in responding to spills, rather TRCA plays a support role
when there is a spill. By Order in Council under the Emergency Management and Civil
Protection Act, the Ontario Minister of the Environment has responsibility for spill and drinking
water emergencies. To this end, the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) has developed an
Emergency Management Program that includes an Emergency Response Plan, a Continuity of
Operations Plan and an Emergency Operations Centre that provides timely services for
receiving, assessing and coordinating responses to spills. The MOEs first level of field
response is provided by environmental officers working out of the MOE-s district or area offices.
These service commitments are facilitated by the Spills Action Centre (SAC), whose role is to
receive reports of spills and other environmental matters and initiate or coordinate a response
as required, as well as a province-wide MOE field response capacity in the Operations Division.
Further support is provided by a network of additional resources available from other parts of
the MOE.
MOEs regulatory mandate for spills arises largely out of Part X of the Environmental Protection
Act, which requires spills to be reported forthwith. Enbridge is a federally regulated pipeline and
therefore would follow the NEB Remediation Process Guide in the event of a release. Enbridge
would work with all parties, including the MOE, through the NEB umbrella.
Part X also requires the owner of the spilled material, and the person who had control of a
material when it was spilled to promptly clean up and restore the environment. MOE ensures
that the cleanup and disposal of spilled materials is done in an environmentally acceptable
manner. When those under statutory duties cannot or will not respond adequately, the Minister
has the authority under the Environmental Protection Act to order those responsible for the spill
to clean up the site. Should they fail to comply with such orders the MOE can undertake the
cleanup and recover costs. Municipalities often provide containment and cleanup measures for
spills to their roadways and drainage systems. Municipalities will also often assist in clean-up of
spills outside of their infrastructure where their capabilities allow or where a responsible party
fails to act. There are cost recovery provisions under the Environmental Protection Act that
allows a municipality to recover the costs resulting from their clean-up efforts from the
responsible party. For a pipeline spill, both the NEB, and the Transportation Safety Board, the
primary federal regulators, will also investigate the cause of the spill, emergency response
actions, and document any suggested improvements for the future.
36
Enbridges first responders arrived on the scene just as oil was reaching the Kalamazoo River
and they were unaware of the scale of the oil release. Much of the initial remedial efforts
involved the placement of oil containment booms downriver of the floating product. These
booms were used to trap the floating and suspended hydrocarbons, but were located several
miles from the release site. These measures would have been more effective if they had been
placed closer to the spill site. The large volume of oil that escaped the spill site contributed
greatly to the environmental effects as well as the complexity and cost of the cleanup for this
accident.
In response to the Kalamazoo spill, corporately Enbridge has made numerous changes in how
they assess, monitor, control and respond to leaks and spills across their operations (source,
Enbridge website: www.enbridgeus.com/main.aspx?id= 15753), as summarized below:
Pipeline and Facility Integrity
• Re-organized the functional areas that are responsible for pipeline and facility integrity.
• Substantially increased pipeline integrity testing and management spending of$150
million per year, to over$450 million in each of 2011 and 2012.
• Since 2011, performed more than 175 in-line inspections and nearly 3,000 pipeline
excavations and undertook hundreds of internal inspections and thousands of
investigative digs.
Leak Detection
• Established the Pipeline Control Systems and Leak Detection department, doubling the
number of employees and contractors dedicated to leak detection and pipeline control.
• Enhanced procedures for leak detection analysis.
• Implemented a Leak Detection Instrumentation Improvement Program to add and
upgrade instrumentation across the system.
Pipeline Control and Control Center Operations
• Developed a Control Room Management plan based on the U.S. Code of Federal
Regulations and implemented a number of the sections in October 1, 2011; remaining
sections were implemented by August 1, 2012.
• Revised and enhanced all procedures pertaining to decision making, handling pipeline
startups and shutdowns, leak detection system alarms, communication protocols and
suspected column separations.
• Enhanced the organizational structures to better support operators and to manage span
of control and workloads.
• Augmented CCO (Control Centre Operations) staff, adding training, technical support,
engineering and operator positions.
• Prior to the accident, Enbridge had started design and construction of a new control
centre in Edmonton, Alberta. The new centre was opened in December 2011 and allows
greater interaction and support for 7 x 24 hour operations.
Emergency Response
• Enbridge has committed an additional $50 million to be spent between 2012 and 2013
to improve equipment, training and overall response capabilities.
• Develop better tools and techniques for worst case waterborne spills.
34
• In 2011, a cross-business unit response team was created for large-scale events
requiring more resources that a single region could provide.
• In 2011, a dedicated Emergency Response group was created in Operation Services for
increased regional support.
• Conducting an Emergency Response preparedness assessment to enhance abilities to
more rapidly respond and contain a significant release.
7) Please provide more detail regarding the spill risks for TRCA.
In the valley and stream corridors of watersheds in TRCA's jurisdiction, there are hundreds of
underground pipe crossings, including oil and gas pipelines, utilities (such as Bell and hydro),
watermains and sewer pipes. Although leaks from corrosion do occur in these pipes, the
primary risk of spills from underground infrastructure in the TRCA jurisdiction is related to
erosion of the soil covering the infrastructure, and its resultant structural failure. Whether a spill
is of heavy or light crude oil, the environmental effects will be significant and long lasting,
particularly since pipeline spills, though infrequent, tend to be larger in magnitude than the
typical fuel releases from trucks or other accidental discharges.
TRCA concerns with pipe infrastructure on or near valley lands includes:
• The in-stream vertical depth of the pipe from the bottom of the watercourse to the top of
the pipe -when downcutting of the watercourse occurs, there must be sufficient natural
cover to ensure the integrity of the pipe is protected
• The horizontal distance of the pipe from the edge of the watercourse to the side of the
pipe-when streambank erosion occurs, there must be sufficient natural cover to ensure
the integrity of the pipe is protected
• The horizontal distance of the pipe from the edge of the valley wall to the side of the
pipe-when valley wall erosion occurs, there must be sufficient natural cover to ensure
the integrity of the pipe is protected
If the pipe infrastructure cannot be sufficiently located below the streambed, or away from the
stream bank or valley wall, then there must be appropriate in-stream, streambank or valley wall
erosion protection measures so as to ensure the integrity of the pipe is protected.
If there are construction requirements to fix the pipelines, the proponent may need to access
the pipeline from the surface, known as an "integrity dig". When access to the pipe is required
from the surface and located in a regulated area, then an Ontario Regulation 166/06 permit will
be required from TRCA. Technical concerns that will need to be addressed relate to flooding,
erosion and conservation of land. In order to satisfy permitting requirements, staff will review
any or all of the following, depending on site characteristics:
• staging;
• storage and access plans;
• tree protection and tree removal plans;
• cut and balance fill requirements; and
• site restoration plans.
35
The primary responsibility for public health and safety in an emergency resulting from a spill or
a fire rests with the municipality. In the TRCA jurisdiction, the municipalities (Peel, York, Durham
and Toronto) have primary response duties when there is a spill in the rivers, and deals directly
with MOE. From time to time, TRCA will receive notification of a spill and provides the caller
with Spills Hotline Contact information, or will contact the Hotline directly. TRCA will attend the
site if there are issues related to TRCA's regulation or property, or if MOE or the municipality
requests technical assistance of TRCA staff in the provision or collection of data related to
technical study requirements.
Over the past decade or more, there have been no spills recorded in the TRCA jurisdiction
related to a oil or gas pipeline rupture. The majority of spills in the TRCA jurisdiction are related
to spills from transportation incidents, dumping or illegal releases to the streams or storm sewer
system, or breaks in municipal sewer infrastructure that is located in or near valley and stream
corridors.
8) Can you assess the ability of the pipeline company to detect small leaks in the pipeline
(i.e., 5% of pipeline volume or less)?
As part of their comprehensive Integrity Management Plan, Enbridge indicates that high
resolution in-line inspection tools are utilized on a regular basis to examine for features in
advance of a failure and to detect the presence of small pin-hole leaks. In addition, pipeline
operator monitoring systems are in place, including a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
(SCADA) system used for pipeline control, and a Computational Pipeline Monitoring (CPM)
system used for real-time monitoring of ruptures and smaller leaks. For leaks beyond the
capability of those systems, other methods are used to detect leaks, including visual/aerial
surveillance, third party reporting, scheduled line balance calculations and sensor based
detection methods. These approaches are used together to examine for all possible leak
conditions, and provide comprehensive and overlapping leak detection capabilities.
9) Does the recent downsizing of Environment Canada's emergency response unit,
shifting coordination to Montreal increase risks in the Toronto region?
This is beyond the scope of TRCA staff to address, but no increased risk from this action is
expected, since Enbridge is responsible for any and all spill response associated with its
pipelines. Depending on the location and extent of a spill event, it is expected that both federal
and provincial regulatory agencies would have a role in ensuring that any required remedial
actions are completed.
10) Is the integrity of this 37 year old pipeline up to the task of increased pressure; 20%
higher volumes than its original design?
As with all petroleum pipelines, Line 9B is subject to regular inspections and maintenance. The
maximum operating pressure is approved by the National Energy Board. The maximum
licensed point operating pressure on Line 9B is 876 psi (6040 kPa). Although the pipeline
capacity will increase, this will be accomplished by adding a friction reducing agent and
additional pumps, not increasing the pressure in the pipeline. There is a slightly elevated risk of
a spill based on the volumetric change, but this is anticipated to be negligible (Source: Line 9b
Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project Pipeline Integrity Engineering Assessment
prepared by: Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Pipeline Integrity Department). As noted earlier, Enbridge
is undertaking an Integrity Dig Program through the TRCA area to investigate and carry-out
pipe maintenance requirements in advance of this project proceeding.
37
11) What new information would be required to fully evaluate the impact of a diluted
bitumen spill on GTA drinking water intakes?
The response to this question was explored more fully in the TRCA report dated November 30,
2012 and has been repeated here for efficiency. A number of spill scenarios were modelled as
part of the Lake Ontario Collaborative (LOC) project to determine if certain land-based activities
could pose a potential drinking water threat to Lake Ontario drinking water supplies. A
summary of this work can be found in the November staff report to Toronto City Council: City
Source Water Protection Plan for City of Toronto Water Treatment Plants
(www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2012/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-51737.pdf). The modelling was
funded by the MOE as part of the Drinking Water Source Protection program. Any scenario that
identified conditions under which a contaminant could exceed a threshold in the raw water was
identified as a significant drinking water threat. One set of scenarios was based on potential
spills of petroleum products from pipelines crossing tributaries within the TRCA jurisdiction and
at other locations along the north shore of Lake Ontario. The predicted impact was a worst case
scenario as the LOC modelling did not consider how any emergency response or mitigation
actions would reduce the impacts.
The LOC spill scenario was based on a spill of gasoline containing 1% benzene and was
selected by the technical working group to represent the greatest risk to drinking water quality.
Crude oil and gasoline have different characteristics and the concentration of benzene
dissolved into solution would differ between crude and gasoline releases. Therefore, the results
of the LOC study cannot be directly transferred from a gasoline release to a crude oil release.
With a crude oil spill, more of the hydrocarbons will remain on the water surface or will be
deposited on the streambed and isolated from the source of drinking water supplies as
compared to gasoline. The model results, which would represent a worst-case scenario,
predicted that benzene levels at the intake could be well above the Ontario Drinking Water
Standard from a large scale gasoline spill (2700 cubic metres). Since the water treatment
system is not designed to remove benzene this was deemed by the Source Protection
Committee to be a significant threat to Lake Ontario drinking water supplies. Details regarding
the spill scenario are provided in the Assessment Report prepared under the Clean Water Act,
2006 for TRCA's watersheds. The section of the Assessment Report that documents threats to
Lake Ontario drinking water supplies be found at:
www.ctcswp.ca/files/TRSPA_Chapter5_Jan2012.pdflink.
The Source Protection Committee has developed proposed policies to reduce the significant
drinking water threats from potential petroleum product pipelines. These policies focus on
reviewing and improving where necessary spill prevention and emergency response plans. The
proposed policies have been submitted to the Minister of the Environment for a decision on
approval and subsequent implementation. The Proposed Source Protection Plan can be
viewed or downloaded at:
www.ctcswp.ca/files/CTCProposedSourceProtectionPlan_LowRezFINAL.pdf. Policy LO-PIPE-1
requests that the MOE review and recommend necessary improvements to existing spill
prevention, spill management, risk reduction and contingency plans.
This policy also includes a provision for the MOE, in collaboration with Environment Canada to:
• Use the existing 3-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Circulation Model and Water Quality
Simulation Model to run proactive simulations of potential spills to predict the extent and
duration of contamination and to help determine the parties to be notified in the event of
a spill.
38
• Install permanent instrumentation for real-time monitoring of water currents and
chemistry in the nearshore of Lake Ontario for input into the models in (i).
• Ensure that the data are available to the municipalities and conservation authorities.
• Undertake Lake Ontario nearshore monitoring annually and make the data are available
to the municipalities and conservation authorities.
12) What is the statistical likelihood of a pipeline failure given current industry averages
for pipelines of this type and age?
In November, 2012, Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Pipeline Integrity Department submitted an
engineering report: Line 9b Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project Pipeline Integrity
Engineering Assessment. Section 3.4.2 of this report, entitled "In-Service Leaks and Ruptures` ,
states: "The mainline segment of Line 9 from ML [Montreal] to NW[North Westover] has
experienced a total of 12 mainline leaks and one mainline rupture since initial construction.
These occurred between 1978 and 2005, and were mostly related to dents and mechanical
damage, including the mainline rupture event. One leak was caused by pipeline corrosion, and
another was caused by a crack. All have been permanently repaired. However, using historical
data to predict future leaks or failures does not account for the technical advancements with
in-line inspections (ILI), corrosion protection or line maintenance or other factors that have
increased the safety of the pipeline, and there is no industry-standard statistical method to
predict pipeline failures. Also, most of the failures were related to external events, such as third
party mechanical damage, which are not possible to predict.
Recognizing these limitations, between 2002 and 2009, the average annual volume spilled from
liquid hydrocarbon pipelines in Canada was about two litres per million litres transported. This
equals an expected failure rate of 0.0002%. Another statistical measure of spill risk is the
number of spills per km of pipeline. Based on the Transportation Safety Board data, the
average number of pipeline spills in Canada between 2006 and 2010 was about one event per
2,000 km of pipeline.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
While TRCA concerns with the Project could be addressed through an agreement with
Enbridge, in order to negotiate such an agreement, legal counsel has advised TRCA to:
1. File an application to participate in the hearing as an Intervenor with the NEB on or
before the April 11, 2013 deadline.
2. Concurrently negotiate with Enbridge and participate in the NEB hearing.
3. While negotiating with Enbridge, staff and its legal counsel will also:
a) review Enbridges NEB application and evidence by April 30, 2013;
b) prepare and submit information requests to Enbridge by May 14, 2103;
c) review responses received from Enbridge and submit follow-up information
requests to Enbridge by June 11, 2103; and,
d) receive responses from Enbridge by June 25, 2013.
4. If TRCA interests are addressed by written agreement with Enbridge by June 30, 2013
then TRCA-S application to participate in the NEB hearing will be withdrawn.
5. If TRCA interests are not addressed by written agreement with Enbridge by June 30,
2013, TRCA will:
a) submit Intervenor evidence; by July 9, 2013;
39
b) respond to information requests from Enbridge and other Intervenors by July
30, 2013;
c) prepare final arguments in writing to the NEB by August 20, 2013 or orally at
the NEB hearing on August 26 to 30, 2013. Staff will determine the best
method for proceeding in the hearing (written or oral) as its involvement in the
hearing progresses.
In addition to the above, TRCA staff will:
1. Continue to liaise with municipal and agency staff with common issues and areas of
concern.
2. Continue to work with Enbridge in the implementation of Enbridges Integrity Dig
Program, including the issuance of permits for investigative, maintenance, and repair
works within TRCA's regulated area and on TRCA-owned lands.
3. Report back to the Authority regarding the outcome of a negotiated settlement, or
following its participation in the hearing process.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
1. Permitting fees as per the TRCA fee schedule are charged for Ontario Regulation 166/06
applications related to the Integrity Dig Program, or other such agreement to ensure
comprehensive reviews are undertaken in a timely manner.
2. Research, writing and meetings related to three board reports, November 2012, and
January and March 2013- approximately $8,000 in staff time has been supported through
the Planning and Development operating budget.
3. Estimated Legal Fees for to support TRCA involvement in the Project are estimated as
between $60,000 and $100,000:
Item Details Estimated
Legal Fees
TRCA Board Review TRCAs draft Board Report Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Line $2 000
Report 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project
Determine the process for participation at the NEB hearing;
TRCA prepare summary of requirements for appearing at the NEB
Participation hearing; review and comment on TRCA-s draft application for $40,000 to
at NEB NEB participant status; prepare for and attend at NEB hearing as $60,000
Intervenor for those portions of the hearing that are directly
relevant to TRCA
Review federal statutory authority for the Enbridge pipeline
Negotiations including the pollution liability cap and prepare summary $15,000 to
with Enbridge memorandum; prepare and negotiate agreement between TRCA $35,000
and Enbridge
To be billed at
Communications with TRCA staff; engagement with TRCA Board; legal
Other communications with the NEB and other participants; other tasks counsel's
as instructed by TRCA, usual hourly
rates
40
4. Staff time associated with the development of materials and appearance at the hearing, as
related to the above five phases- $20,000 to $75,000. Additional costs for travel,
accommodation and expert witnesses as required are estimated to cost between $10,000 to
$50,000.
The total cost of participating in the hearing could cost between $100,000 to $175,000. The
TRCA corporate budget for 2013 annual legal fees is $125,000 for Development Planning
applications, including Ontario Municipal Board and Mining and Lands Commission hearings
and $50,000 for Property issues. While staff costs will be assumed through the repositioning of
current workloads, the 2013 TRCA Budget has no funding provisions for the costs for legal fees,
expert witnesses, or travel and accommodation associated with the NEB hearing on the Line 9B
Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project.
Report prepared by: Don Ford, extension 5369 and Beth Williston, extension 5217
Emails: dford @trca.on.ca or bwilliston @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Don Ford, extension 5369 and Beth Williston, extension 5217
Emails: dford @trca.on.ca or bwilliston @trca.on.ca
Date: March 12, 2013
Attachments: 2
41
Attachment 1
A
MONTREAL
QUEBEC
tI
uTI
rellile80000
Hee 41,-E1
-
°Ottawa
64,40.abwo
CATIMAL
,qoe
•
,• ,
•
••• •
1,11110',1
,•"' NEW YORK
Ao4 Pier,
01.1+.1y.
." Tomato. L'AP4101.,
Oik
KUIPTH
!Mt:STOVER
WESIVAER , Enbcidne Pgpeignes gnc.
NORf,4
- LAMAAA,111 A,A6V,A4PR ---------- „Ire uE ke.,ersni PloilProcos.ffst
00_10o0
Lire!•1 P gr,,C11-11 Phase I fccogct
c r,r,Ore,
Other Feature0
•
0 100 J PEV-INSI'LVANIA
PA AdA 041.1.1
42
D
Table of Chemical Constituents Coinmonly Found in Crude Oil
0
3
I',is ird:,rridii:m is f,r rr.ir:,nrr±tr<I Al rxfrnsi.res. I,r'* ..,nsliii.r-nls dry prrs■dnl I r snr-11s.:,4,ry--in all.:n.arnil. liiff!-n-nl I'ylwa AI-:IiI,life I0L1 swr!-1;.n•'• 'II,11a.•r .:iffrry=rI L-FFls,of lhs sr_ 3
•I,el-IIcdls.II rc:ports:::.std Ii:..Late cpcdrfic pc.bli-I1cr Ir Arils,JGC will:A:eel:op dr<c.pcblist I(:d.crurxis:.cc strip:to stop or I i:ca.c.:csposurc =
ift.dCr I:IJnaI cclrStiLs ants niov Ix:am.o.c:to this Ilse as nuc.CZ.F.A`IrriOrrlal ibl-,on ccl,stick_':rts c :rc c.c:oil lit lists 11Cl2,ccI.:D.htto:ii www.asha.ewicts?asta?otlniotrfI lacctrl iv 2.htril rt
-I,e ..al,ccr vale.'ii lur ben:roc is busy cc on 3nc CH.CO-J11rLI case il,or,c r iillipu svrl 3 lil:t11°1c or epc,sr.lc rcl 3 cnlpk•tc to,ic pi olio of LJch .I,cmiool is this rhArt,o;,ro N
htto liwww,ater,3 Civavkoxurehiles/ir,c15155513
Chemical What is being done to Routes of Acute(immediate)health Chronic(long- Comparison How to protect
monitor exposures? exposure and risks term)health risks Values;safe against exposure
absorption level for
humans'•'•3
Benzene Local Poison Control Benzene vapors, Eating or drinking highly- Long-term exposure In An If benzene is released
Calnrless.sweet- Canners and Health (or fumes)can he corttaminatcud fool or water can can adversely affect 10 uglm3 irto the air,Dave the
smelling liquid and Departments are tracking Inhaled and cause vomiting,c onwh bone marrow and Chronic;0.1 a ea. Avoid contact
vapor.Evaporates very calls related to potential benzene can be irritation,dizziness,sleepiness, cause anemia, ug/m3 Cancer. with contaminated
quickly and dissolves exposures to this consumed in correulsiors,raPic heart rate,and leukemia and death. water,soil or
slgitfy in water. c-emical,and several contaminated death. lrlraing low levels of In lquds; sediment.
federal agencies, fend or water.It benzene can irrtate eyes, nose, 5 ugJl Chronic;
including the EPA,are can also be throatanc skin, People with 0.6 ug/l Cancer,
taking frequent air and absorbed through chronic diseases such as asthma
water samples, the skin. Benzene may be more sensitive to fumes. In Soil;
dues not 30 mg/kg
accumulate in Chronic; 10
W significant mg/kg Cat r.
amounts in the
body.
Hydrogen sulfide Local Poison Control Hydrogen sulide Inhaling low levels Chronic exposure to In Air; No health If hydrogen sulfide is
Hycrrsgr l sulfide Ls is Centers and Health can be inhaled Of corlrentratiorts cif hydrogen high levels may effects have been released into the Cr,
poisonous,flammable, Departments are tracking absorbed through sulfide can irritate the eyes, cause long-term or found in humarts leave the area. Avoid
colorless gas that calls related to potential the skin.In the nose,or throat. People with permanent effects exposed to typical contact with
smells like rotten exposures to this body,hydrogen chronic diseases such as asthma including headaches, environmental contaminated water,
eggs.People usually ciemical,and several sulfide is primarily may have trouble breathing. Brief impaired attention concentrations of soil or sediment.
can small hydrogen federal agencies, converted to exposure to mrcentrations of span, rriesnory,or hydrogen sulfde Herause the gas is
sulfide at very low including the EPA,are sulfate and is hydrogen sulfide greater than motor function, 0.2 0.5 uglm3). heavier than oxygen,
concentrations in air. taking frequent air and excreted in the 540 ppm can cause loss of it hangs at low levels
water samples. urine,Hydrogen consciousness. In many eases it the air,closer to
sulfide is rapidly where people are rerrraveci from the ground.
removed from the the exposure immediately,they
body. regain carsciousress without any
other effects.
'he rvinirnal Risk level I NRI I i,s an estimate of the Pally human expo51,re to a harar:.wcs sc:hstance that 15 likely to be without appret.iabit,risk of anverse,non-canter health effects over a specifiers
cu ration of exposure.-he infcrmatian in this NRL serves as a screening tool to help public health prcfesspnals series where to look more rbsely to evaluate possible risk of acverse health effects
from hi man eeposl.re. Measures are:alculatec as ug.(micrograms)/m3(meters rubes)in air;ug(mierop„„rams)/I(liter)in water;mg(mlligrams)/kg(kllcgrams)in sai.'All comparison values in this
table were:alra.laterr by the Agency;for'ties yt.bstarr.:e3 cot uisease Registry,'he r:alp:l-laticsre for rar,rer values are base,.on Natk,nal Acaterny of Sciences iNAS)assessment rnethots.
Table 'of Clieinical Constituents Commonly Found in Crude Oil
'1%r,irli;mr-ial Al: IS far::nviranriental,s, )1.....1 r:-.,.; -hew:::,1,-,1 ill.FIM.al.!,pn,wni t o 5111-11,;:rgri,i-i n A l l I'l 1.1....a:i l l Dilfrr,n1 lypF%:if t)11.Ilk!,li.ghi L.v.,,,-.:,1::II.1:F:A.ilAW ciffin-ent levs-ls cif ille,,e
iiLils.If tcports,c,s ata irc ir.atr_siKsifiz publi:health,rist±. CDC will:,:c,elop arr.:.pi blish r5u_3ini1C1',',_.2'taps rut slap ar i'f2r.!1.:".C.,2,p3si..r
r..4,car■al s,,ostiti'ar,t,nay Ix .s..0.?:_,t.s this list as otc.,2:: roc it■larmAtic,r.an sacryikt sJ,ts al at:_.-2 oil rrot lisit,tc,tc,sat:,.htte,:i:www.nsha. n,latsist,:lotinis.itt•I tWott.) i, 2.htr.,1
—lc..31,::',14'.11,;::tar IKE::orie i.c.base.or,-ore c:,,:.e.;f:C.,11::.1 za.ce in arm million 0.it'.1'.1 ilrfAll'IC ti ci,ipocu re.sal a zompbte to si:przitilc,al's:1;:h Mil'I—kal in this-,:hart,53 ta
hittia.//www.atr.z .p.ovitokorofilesiinc:exaso
Chemical What is being done to Routes of Acute(immediate)health Chronic(long- Comparison Haw to protect
monitor exp)sures? exposure and risks term)health risks Values:safe against exposure
absorption level for
humans''2•3
Ethyl benzene _ocal Paean Control Ethyl benzene can Exposure to high levels of ethyl Long term exposure In air:3,C100 If ethyl benzene is
Ethyl benzene is a :Iienters and Health be inhalad, benzene in air for short periods hers not heel ug/m3 released into the air,
colorless celorlessliqIsId.ltst Departments are tracking absorbel through can irritate eye and throat. studied in humans, leave the area.Avoki
highly flammable and -irialls related to potential the skin,or Exposure to higher levels can In water: 1,C0,0 canted with
smells like gasoline.It exposures to this ingested in cause dizziness or vertigo. ug/I contaminated water.
is natural y found in ,:hemiglr and several contaminated
coal tar and Weal agencies, water. In soil;5,001.1
petroleum. ncluding the EPA,are ug/kg
:eking frequent air and
water samples.
•I Toluene aka
and Health
Methylbenzene _ace!Poison Control
:=. Toluene can be Short term exposure to low to Long term exposure In air 3130 ug/m3 If toluene is released
.enters
inhaled,ab9orbed moderate levels can cause to toluene may into the air,leave the
•I Toluene is a clear, Departments are tracking through the skin, tiredne ,confusion,weakness, affect the nervous In water:200 ug/I area.Avoid contact
colorless liquid and r:ells related to potential or ingested in impainal meimory or motor system or kidneys. with contaminated
vapor that smells like exposures to this contaminated control, nausea,lass of appetrte, In soil: 1,000 water,soil,or
gasoline.Toluene :.hemical,and several water, loss of hearing and color vision. mg/kg sediment.
ocrurs naturally in -Were!agencies, Inhaling high level of toluere in
crude nit- rcluding the EPA,are a short time can make yinu feel
raking frequent air and light headed,dizzy,or sleepy.It
water samples. can also cause unconscbusness
and may be fatal.
Xylene _ocal Poison Control Xylene can be Short term exposure to high Symptoms may In air:3,0010 If xylene is released
Xylene is a oolorless., Centers and Heath inhaled,ingested levels can cau headaches,LKk include impaired ug/m3 into the air,leave the
sweet smelling liquid Departments are tracking in contaminated of coordination,dizziness, reaction time, area.Avoid skin
and vapor.It is highly r:alls related to potential water and corrfusbn,and impaired balance. concentration and In water 2,10:0 contact with tar,
flammable and exposures to this absorbed through Such exposure can also irritate memory,and ug/I gasoline, paint
evaporates easily.It :hemical,and several the skin, skin,eyes,nose,throat and changes in the liver varnish,shellac and
occurs naturally in tideral agencies, stomach.Other symptoms may and kidneys. In soil: 10,000 contaminated water.
petroleum and coal rKiluding the EPA,are include breathing difficultic5r mg/kg
tar. raking frequent air and especially in those with chronic
water samples. lung prDblems.At very high
levels,exposure may cause
uncnnsciOMness and death.
'-he hlinirmil Itisk level IV RI)is en estimate s...1 the;tally hurkin eapuss.re to a Harare:01.5 5.1p5tanr-e that is likely to he wi711c.0 appreciable risk:..)f ac:verse.noreciin,-er health effects aver a 5piel,:ifileil
curation of exixisure.—he information in this rirliL serves as a screening tool to help public health professionals CefIC:E where to look more Ebsely to evaluate possible risk of acverse health effects
from human,eiposure.`Measures are calculatec as ug(microgramsiim3(meters cubes)in air,ug(microrgramsVi)liter)in water,rng(railkgrarnsifkgfkikograms)in soil,'All comparison-valu es in this
table were taluulaten by the tigenci.fur.uxit;!'1;bstint:t.s am![Disease Keg istr y.'he;:alcklations for(:ancer,vall,e5 are basKt ors National AcoEie riy of Scie rii:e 5 I NA.'5)as.sessFICIPt roethur:s.
Table of Chemical Constituents Commonly Found in Crude Oil
his irf;In'ISli:iriis fin rriviv..irn-Iv,:II.ir:p:rsiri c.. hies..';ansldl.rnl''<irvpn.=v-ril'Iasar-lr;:I= n-:'m all;:rl.cr:iii. Dail-rrnl Iypri.:A...il.11krll,hl sw-;=l;:rl..:V Oil,hass ,afirrr-rd'IrvrP,;AI bl-'.v-
:herll:ale.It rs:pcltc;:m.3la!NI:st,:sip:l.1:pr bile health risks,CDC.will c•evclap an::pL,bhsF Iccarurlene:ec steps[.;stap:,l 1'o L:r c sposl.re.
4.ccrticis31 Loirstitl..Lists I"3y be.3ccet:L:,this list 3S ItercLL: r 31 iruici"I'13tius an L31isl Rl enld ci;IL ce Jil IIut list:c lbcic,oiei LL.htt❑:,,9www.oshla.sovlotsr 75t<1!ctrl/3tvi i,elot1'1 rd 2.htlrll
u L.31"∎2[1I Y3Irr`for bus i',(2 is 63scc L<n 31,2 i'A::S__anLe1 23..f`II,disc 211111c11 Dyer a lhirririr`-plc we:A is rc,r 3 2-a-iplcrL rDsl`pi oIile ci eaek II,L1-lic-1 III this€1131 t,p,L,t:d
htto:i;www.atrz r.vr's.envftoxorof Hell/inc.a r,roe
Chemical What is being done to Routes of Acute(immediate)health Chronic(long- Comparison How to protect
monitor exposures? exposure and risks term)health risks Values:safe against exposure
absorption level for
humans'''•'
Naphthalene and Local Poison Control Naphthalene can Exposure to high levels of Long term exposure In air:3 uglm3 If the concentration
Methyl naphthalene Centers aril Health he inlaled, naphthalene can cause nausea, has been hnked to rises above('1300
Naphthalene is a Departments are tracking absorbed through vomiting,diarrhea,blood in hemolytic anemia,a In water, 71)0 Lig/1 mg/m3)in the air,
colorless to white or calls related to potential the skin,or urine,rash and yellow skin, disorder of red blood leave the area.Avoid
brown sold or vapor exposures to this ingested th rough Exposure to extremely elevated cells.Symptoms ct In soil:709 ugjkg contact with
that smells like chemical,and several mntaminated levels(500 ppm)of aincar e thin anemia include contamirated water,
mothballs.It federal agencies, water naphthalene can be fatal. fatigue,lack of soil and sekdirrert.
evaporates quickly inducing tie EPA,are appetite,
and dissolves in voter takng frequent air and restlessness,and
t-Methylnaphthalene water sar.ales. pale skin.
is a clear liquid and 2-
Methylnnphthalene is
/� a solid.
V Generic alkanes Local Poison Control Alkanes can be Inhaling high levels of n'-iexane Toxicity is In air:31,000 If generic alkanes are
(Including octane, Centers arid Heath inhaled,absorbed (a speck type of medium-sized dependent on type ug/rr,3* released into the air,
hexane,nonane) Departments are tracking through the skin, arcane),can cause numtuess in of alkane as well as leave the area.Avoid
Alkanes are colorless calls mlated to potential or ingested in the fete and hands and muscle route and duration In water. 120,009 contact with
liquids or vapors that exposures to this contaminated weakness in the feet and lower of exposure.Long ug/l* contamirated water,
smell lice gas,dine, chemical,and several water legs.Inhaling high levels of some ter na exposure to n- soil or sediment.
They are present in federal agencies, alkanes can cause asphyxiation. hexane can causes In soil:600
crude oil and ireluding tie EPA,are weakness and kiss mg/kg*
petroleum products takng frequent air and of feeling in the
They are highly water samales. arms and legs.In 'Decane and
flammable and
evaporate easily one study,exposed white oil
workers removed
from the exposure
site recovered in 6
months to a year.
'-he Minimal Risk lave]IM.RI)is an eetl-nate of the daily hu.rrlan exposi.re to a[lazarrtor.c til.lrstanc:e that is likely to be wit ho 41 appre€iahlc risk of adverse,non-s.anrer health effects over a Spea:ifiec:
duration of exposure,The inforrlatior in this NRL serves as a screening tool to help public health professionals decide where to look more cosely to evaluate possible risk of adverse Fealth effects
from human exposure.`Measures are calculated as ug(mlcroarams)/m3(meters cubed)in air;ug(mlcrograms),'l(Ilter)in pater;rig(milllgrams)/kg(kilograns)in sail.'All comparison values In this
table were raleidatea by the Agenry for riles Su bstarx'e5 and laisease Re,ghstry. he cold',laticuns for corker vnll.es iris baseat rid Nat Iona)cra:lerny of Sumner%'!'S INAS)assessment rnethrsss..
RES.#A31/13 - FOREST HEALTH AND EMERALD ASH BORER
Annual Update. An update on the status of significant or new forest
health pests for 2012 within the TRCA jurisdiction, and an update on the
management to address the threat posed by the emerald ash borer to
ash trees within the TRCA jurisdiction.
Moved by: Vincent Crisanti
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority(TRCA) owns and manages
numerous forests and conservation areas and is engaged in several forest management
initiatives on both private lands and TRCA-owned lands;
AND WHEREAS emerald ash borer is an invasive insect species that poses a serious
threat to all ash trees within the TRCA jurisdiction, affecting forest biodiversity, public
safety and TRCA operations;
AND WHEREAS TRCA has the ability and responsibility to lessen the impact from forest
pests and invasive species including emerald ash borer by developing effective
management approaches;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT staff continue to work with all levels of
government to monitor trends and conditions of current forest insect and invasive plant
populations and to formulate appropriate strategies to manage or eliminate those threats;
THAT staff act to integrate an appropriate emerald ash borer management approach into
all relevant TRCA actions and initiatives;
THAT staff continue to engage with TRCA's partners in the coordinated and effective
management of emerald ash borer, including providing expertise and advice to TRCA's
municipal partners as they develop and implement their own emerald ash borer
management plans;
AND FURTHER THAT the forest health working group continue to report back annually to
the Authority regarding issues and threats, including emerald ash borer, their
implications and recommended responses.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #4/11, held on April 29, 2011, Resolution #A70/11 was approved as
follows:
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff continue to work with all
levels of government to monitor trends and conditions of current forest insect and
invasive plant populations and to formulate appropriate strategies to manage or eliminate
those threats;
AND FURTHER THAT the forest health working group continue to report back annually to
the Authority regarding issues and threats, their implications and recommended
responses.
46
The TRCA Forest Health Working Group was established in January 2010 to coordinate and
monitor forest health issues and to facilitate coordination and improve efficiencies between
internal departments and programs. The Forest Health Working Group provides this report to
address two main issues. The first is to provide a summary of the 2012 Silvicultural Forest
Health Report outlining the status of significant or new forest health pests for 2012. The second
is to provide a status report on TRCA emerald ash borer (EAB) management to date and to
report on the implications, both financial and environmental. This report fulfills the request
made to staff from the Authority to report on emerald ash borer management and potential
ongoing management implications.
2012 Silvicultural Forest Health Report
The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR)with the assistance of the Canadian Forest
Service (CFS) and local agencies, monitors potentially harmful forest pest populations and
forest damage caused by pest outbreaks and abiotic causes across Ontario. The Canadian
Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)works to prevent the initial introduction and spread of
non-native forest pests and diseases such as EAB and Asian long-horned beetle (ALHB). The
report below is intended to update the Authority regarding some of the primary and new pest
and disease concerns and not as a comprehensive summary of these concerns.
In 2012, non-native invasive pest species and specifically emerald ash borer continue to
present the greatest concern related to the health of southern Ontario-s forests. Drought also
impacted TRCA's and other jurisdictions this past summer. Immediate impacts from our dry
summer were noted in some of TRCA's current tree planting projects, however drought stress
on established trees tends to have long-term effects that results in higher susceptibility to and
increased mortality from other insects and diseases. 2012 was a relatively quiet year in relation
to many of Ontario-s cyclical forest pests including forest tent caterpillar and gypsy moth. A
localized infestation of gypsy moth was recorded in the City of Mississauga. Municipal staff is
monitoring this infestation closely and will continue to update TRCA and partners on
management actions taken. A slight increase of gypsy moth activity was recorded in TRCA-s
Terrestrial Fixed Plot Monitoring Program.
As part of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program, TRCA-s Terrestrial Fixed Plot
Monitoring is one of the tools used to monitor forest health. It was initiated in 2008 to detect
spatial and temporal trends in the vegetation, breeding bird, amphibian and Plethodontid
salamander communities in select areas within the TRCA jurisdiction. In 2012, a summary
report was produced representing the baseline conditions of the various monitoring indicators
including forest health. This annual monitoring will provide for an ongoing role in monitoring the
overall health of forests in the region.
47
Asian Long-horned Beetle (ALHB)
Monitoring and sampling efforts within the ALHB regulated area in Toronto and Vaughan did
not detect any infested trees in 2012. No new finds have occurred since December 2007 and
if ongoing monitoring of the area does not detect any more beetles the Canadian Food
Inspection Agency (CFIA)will be able to declare ALHB as eradicated from the regulated zone
later this year. The CFIA has released the following; "The ALHB survey is ongoing and the
Regulated Area remains in place until eradication is announced. The CFIA is hopeful that the
negative findings during the survey for ALHB will continue and that eradication will be
determined in the near future". However, as reported last year, a large and diffuse outbreak of
this beetle in Massachusetts means that this insects continues to represent a future threat to
our forests. The Environmental Commissioner of Ontario highlighted this concern in his
January 2012 special report on Biodiversity.
Thousand Canker Disease of Walnut
Thousand Canker Disease of walnut was first highlighted by TRCA staff in last years health
update. It has not been detected in Ontario, however, this is a disease of concern due to
detections over the past couple of years in the eastern United States. In 2012 a trapping
program was initiated to determine whether the insect involved in this disease is present in
Ontario. As of October 2012, inspection of traps from the summers trapping program had not
resulted in any positive finds.
Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
Hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA) is a non-native insect that has been present in North America
for quite some time. In the eastern United States this insect was first reported in 1951 and
causes significant mortality in eastern hemlock. This summer HWA was detected for the first
time in Ontario and within TRCA-s jurisdiction. Four young hemlock trees on a residential
property in Etobicoke were found to be infested with HWA. The trees were removed and
surveys by the CFIA in the surrounding area did not find any additional infestations. The CFIA
tracked these four infested trees to the Ontario nursery from which they were purchased and
their suspect origin to a nursery in Pennsylvania. No additional infested trees have been
detected in Ontario.
Emerald Ash Borer(EAB) Management Update
EAB, which was first detected in the Windsor\Detroit area in 2002, is now present in 18 U.S.
states and two Canadian provinces—Ontario and Quebec. Some reports now place the
number of trees killed at over 100 million with up to 10 billion trees at risk. Several insecticides
are registered in Canada for individual tree injections but the larger scale and long term
prospect of controlling this insect in North America depends either on finding an effective
biological control agent or on a natural ecosystem response.
48
EAB was first detected in the TRCA-s jurisdiction in Toronto in 2007. EAB has now been
detected in most TRCA municipalities; however its presence is still sporadic in many areas
especially rural regions of the TRCA jurisdiction. Areas in Toronto and Vaughan are seeing
significant ash mortality and this is expected throughout the TRCA jurisdiction over the next 10
to 15 years. Outside of the City of Toronto, EAB infestations have not been confirmed to date on
any TRCA properties. TRCA staff expect to observe EAB activity on some TRCA properties in
2013 and also an ongoing significant growth of this outbreak and tree mortality in the region.
In TRCA-s Recommended Approach for the Management of Emerald Ash Borer report,
immediate management actions for 2012 were identified in eight key areas. Attachment 1
summarizes TRCA EAB Management accomplishments for 2012 and work to be completed in
2013.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
TRCA has taken significant steps toward an effective plan for the management of EAB. In order
to ensure effective implementation, management plans will be finalized that help to relate and
incorporate the identified management approach into existing forest health initiatives
undertaken by TRCA. This will include communicating with each TRCA section and working
with them to devise an approach for implementation. Additional budget allocations to address
EAB have been approved in both Peel and York regions for 2013. Funding is required in
Durham for targetted EAB action.
Report prepared by: Tom Hildebrand extension 5379,
Meaghan Eastwood extension 5734
Emails: thildebrand @trca.on.ca, meastwood @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Tom Hildebrand, extension 5379
Emails: thildebrand @trca.on.ca
Date: January 30, 2012
Attachments: 1
49
Attachment 1
TRCA Management Activities 2012
Action Identified in Status Additional
Recommended TRCA 2012 Management Activities TRCA 2013 Management
Management Approach Activities
1.Characterize the extent of Complete—on the ground inventory of
ash trees within the individual potentially hazardous ash trees
jurisdiction. along property edges, trails, and adjacent to
infrastructure.
Approximately 25,000 ash trees inventoried
in total.
2. Identify priority areas for Complete-(as above) Continue Sampling of ash
potential hazard tree trees to determine extent of
removal. infestation.
Establish priority areas for Ash
tree removals once infestation
is confirmed.
3.Determine the location of Complete—individual trees identified for
high value ash trees for 2012, 2013 and ongoing treatment
treatment.
4.Determine location of high In progress In progress
conservation value ash
communities for targeted
management.
5.Develop implementation Ongoing —initial mapping inventory lists Complete ash tree inventory
plans for TRCA properties. produced for all TRCA managed lands and mapping for Rouge Park
excluding Rouge Park Lands.
6.Finalize the EAB Complete—July 2012
Management Approach
7. Initiate a tree protection 170 trees treated at 6 TRCA locations Treatment of an additional 315
program (TreeAzin (To be repeated every 2 years until high value ash trees in Peel,
injections). infestation abates) York and Durham
8. Initiate communications Initiated TRCAwebpage completed
strategy.
50
RES.#A32/13 - WEST NILE VIRUS UPDATE
Summary of the 2012 West Nile Virus Monitoring and Surveillance
program and receipt of the annual report-West Nile Virus Vector
Mosquito Larval Monitoring and Surveillance-2012.
Moved by: Mike Mattos
Seconded by: Deb Schulte
THAT the annual report'West Nile Virus Vector Mosquito Larval Monitoring and
Surveillance - 2012"be received;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be directed to circulate
the annual report to the public health units of the regional municipalities of Peel, Durham,
York and the City of Toronto;
THAT TRCA staff be directed to continue to participate in the Regional West Nile Virus
Advisory Committees for Peel, Durham, York and the City of Toronto;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff be directed to continue West Nile virus larval mosquito
monitoring in wetlands and stormwater management ponds on TRCA-owned land during
the 2013 summer season.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
West Nile virus (WNV) is a seasonal disease known in Canada since 2001. Two key mosquito
species, Culex pipiens and Culex restuans, are the primary species responsible for spreading
the disease to humans in Ontario. The level of WNV activity and risk of exposure depends on
the number of infected bird hosts and the number of adult mosquitos carrying the virus in a
given year. It is difficult to predict the numbers of the species of mosquitos that most frequently
transmit the virus since their populations change from year to year, vary across jurisdictions
and depend on a number of environmental factors. WNV management is focused on prevention
and control and is collectively undertaken by the provincial, regional and municipal health
agencies in Ontario.
As a major owner of natural lands, including substantial wetland areas, TRCA has had an
interest in the WNV issue. As a measure of due diligence and at the request of regional health
units, TRCA has been routinely monitoring larval mosquito populations in TRCA's natural
wetlands and selected stormwater management ponds (SWMPs) since 2003. The objective of
the monitoring has been to identify preferred breeding sites of the two key mosquito species,
assess the level of risk, and reduce human exposure to WNV by taking appropriate measures
like housekeeping activities (grading small depressions, garbage removal) and larviciding, if
necessary. TRCA's WNV program activities include public education and outreach activities,
collaborating with the regional health units and conducting mosquito larval surveillance on
TRCA-owned lands. The data collected over the years has been beneficial in guiding
management decisions related to wetland protection and creation, land management planning
and has assisted the public health agencies with their public education and outreach
campaigns.
51
At Authority Meeting #2/12, held on March 30, 2012, Resolution #A28/12 was approved, in
part, as follows:
...AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff be directed to continue Vest Nile virus larval mosquito
monitoring in wetlands and stormwater management ponds on TRCA-owned land during
the 2012 summer season.
As per the Authority Resolution, the WNV surveillance and monitoring activities were again
implemented in 2012. The following summarizes these activities and results:
Summary of WNV Program Activities in 2012
TRCA's WNV program continued to implement its three-pronged approach including public
education and outreach, collaboration with public health units, and larval monitoring and
surveillance on TRCA properties.
Public education and outreach activities in 2012 focused on updating and distribution of WNV
related information and addressing public and staff inquires on WNV and standing water
complaints. TRCA received a total of three standing water complaints associated with TRCA
properties in 2012. The three complaint sites were: 1) Kortright Archetype Sustainable House
pond, 2) Boyd Centre lower parking lot, and 3) residential area near Altona Forest.
After investigation, the Archetype Sustainable House pond was identified as a WNV vector
mosquito hotspot. The pond was later drained and stocked with fish (koi); the control method
(fish stocking)was effective, no mosquito larvae were found during the three follow-up visits.
The Boyd Centre lower parking lot was also identified as a hotspot. The problematic area was a
small depression at the bottom of the hills. Restoration Services filled and graded the area later
in the season. This site will be re-visited regularly during the 2013 field season to ensure the
problem has been resolved. The Altona Forest site was dry when the monitoring program
started and it remained dry throughout the summer, thus no actions were taken.
Collaborations with regional health units required TRCA staff to attend regional health WNV
committee meetings, share collected WNV data and notify the regions of any potential WNV
vector hotspots.
TRCA received an Order on April 2, 2012 from the Medical Officer of Peel Regional Health
under the Health Protection and Promotion Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.7 to assist with the
implementation of control measures to reduce the number of mosquito larvae in the Heart Lake
Wetland Complex in Brampton. The Heart Lake Wetland Complex continued to be an area of
concern for WNV; a ditch located near the wetland was treated with larvicide by Peel Region in
2012. It is anticipated that TRCA will receive another Order from the Peel Regional Medical
Officer in 2013.
WNV larval surveillance and monitoring was undertaken in 38 wetlands and six SWMPs across
the TRCA jurisdiction from May 14th to August 24th, 2012 to identify larval mosquito species
distribution, abundance and community composition. Each site was sampled four times during
the field season, and the sites with high mosquito numbers during the 4th sampling event were
followed up by an additional visit. For each site, an assessment of the densities of each
mosquito species was conducted.
52
Summary of Results Obtained in 2012
The sampling season in 2012 yielded a total of 6,358 mosquito larvae from wetlands and 1,317
mosquito larvae from SWMPs. As in previous years, the wetland habitats sampled supported a
greater diversity of mosquitos with 10 different species being found in wetlands while only six
species were found in SWMPs.
Among the wetland sites, 44% of the larvae collected were non-vector species (i.e. the species
generally not responsible for spreading WNV), while the remaining 56%were vectors (i.e.
species most commonly found to spread WNV). The predominant non-vector species was
Culex territans (44%), and the predominant vector species was Culex pipiens (39%). The
number of Culex pipiens collected from the wetlands was the highest ever since the monitoring
began in 2003. This increase was influenced by the following factors:
1. An exceptionally high number of Culex pipiens were collected at Grenadier Pond in
High Park. In total, 1,207 Culex pipiens were collected at this one site. This
represents more than half(53%) of all Culex pipiens found in all wetlands combined.
2. Due to the dry and hot summer conditions, many small wetland habitats turned into
shallow, warm and organic-rich pools of water that are favourable breeding sites for
this species.
WNV risk assessment resulted in only three sites being identified as areas of concern for WNV
vector larvae among the wetland sites. Larvicide treatments were applied to all of these sites
including Grenadier Pond in High Park, Topham Pond and Albion Hills Pond 2. Grenadier Pond
and Topham Pond were treated by the City of Toronto and Albion Hills Pond 2 was treated by
Peel Region Public Health.
Among the SWMP sites, vector species comprised 94% of the mosquito population. Culex
pipiens which represented 90% of the mosquito larvae collected was the predominant species
found in SWMPs and is the key mosquito species associated with the spread of WNV in
Ontario. Culex territans, the only non-vector species found in the SWMPs, comprised 6% of the
mosquito community. WNV risk assessment resulted in one SWMP (L'4moreaux Park North
Pond) being identified as an area of concern for WNV vector larvae and it was treated by the
Public Health Department of the City of Toronto.
Overall, the results from 2012 monitoring and surveillance have indicated that although rare,
localized WNV hotspots continue to occur on TRCA properties. It should be noted that the WNV
itself is not found in the wetlands or SWMPs identified, and that the designation of"hotspot"
only implies that the larval mosquitos found are of the variety that have been known to transmit
the virus to humans once they have emerged from the water as adults and have first bitten an
infected bird. The proactive nature of this monitoring program and the subsequent action is
designed to control and reduce the number of the adult mosquitos available to transmit the
virus, thus reducing the potential exposure to humans.
53
From 2003 to 2010, the numbers of human WNV cases have declined in Ontario. However, in
2011 and 2012, the number of human WNV cases in Ontario increased to 64 and 259,
respectively. Within the TRCA jurisdiction, there were 134 reported human WNV cases in 2012:
91 cases in the City of Toronto, 20 cases in Peel Region, 16 cases in York Region, and seven
cases in Durham Region. These reported numbers of human cases in 2012 were the second
highest since the discovery of the virus in 2002. TRCA-s monitoring data has shown that the
numbers of human WNV cases in Ontario is positively correlated with number of Culex pipiens
larvae collected in a given year. Therefore, having a larval monitoring program in place is
crucial for identifying potential risk on TRCA properties. Risk prevention relies on identifying the
areas of concern for WNV and following up with proper intervention measures.
A copy of the Annual Report: "Vest Nile Vrus Vector Mosquito Larval Monitoring and
Surveillance -2012" is available on the corporate website for reference (www.trca.on.ca: key
word: West Nile Virus). Copies will be provided to members upon request.
RATIONALE
The overarching rationale for undertaking WNV larval monitoring is that a variety of wetland
habitats on TRCA properties such as marshes, woodland pools and ponds have the potential to
provide breeding habitats for mosquitoes because of the permanent availability of water. As a
large landowner in the Toronto region, TRCA has used the WNV monitoring and surveillance
activities as a means of ensuring "due diligence' and to proactively manage the WNV issue on
our properties. The approach taken —to identify the presence of WNV associated mosquito
species has ensured that larvicide has only been applied to sites with potential risk. Based on
the number of sites assessed by TRCA on an annual basis, this approach has been found to be
a cost effective alternative to wider scale preventative larvicide application.
Staff anticipate continued requests from the public for actions to be taken to address perceived
mosquito breeding in standing water on TRCA-owned lands that are close to their properties,
and from the regional health departments to help determine the sensitivity of natural areas for
the purpose of larviciding. TRCA-s WNV program also helps to identify vector numbers and
high density sites. The identification of isolated sites with high density of mosquitoes associated
with WNV in wetlands and stormwater ponds warrants the ongoing annual monitoring and
surveillance program.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Staff will continue surveillance activities at approximately 45 sites on TRCA-owned lands and
will continue to liaise with regional health units and participate in WNV advisory committees
throughout the 2013 field season. Staff will continue to respond to public inquiries on WNV and
reports of standing water on TRCA property, in addition to providing general information for
both the public and staff on WNV. Standing water complaints will be reviewed and addressed
following the TRCA's Standing Water Complaint Procedure. Staff will continue to identify sites
of concern for WNV on TRCA property through larval monitoring and advise other TRCA
sections on maintenance or management duties required to reduce the number of potential
breeding sites for mosquitoes.
54
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for the 2013 WNV surveillance and monitoring activities is available under the Regional
Watershed Monitoring Program with capital funding support from the regions of York, Peel and
Durham and the City of Toronto. A small amount of revenue is generated (approximately
$1,000) by the program on an annual basis through the provision of mosquito larvae
identification training for regional health staff.
Overall this funding will be sufficient to support the 2013 surveillance field work and staff
support to liaise with the regional health units and to respond to complaints. The funding is not
however expected to cover any costs associated with control measures if deemed necessary. If
larviciding or site remediation is required as a control measure, the associated costs will be
covered through TRCA Land Management funding. However, there have been opportunities
identified in the past two years to partner with the various regional health departments in order
to have sites treated with larvicide in a timely manner and at no cost to TRCA.
Report prepared by: Jessica Fang, extension 5665
Emails:jfang @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Jessica Fang, extension 5665
Emails:jfang @trca.on.ca
Date: March 22, 2013
RES.#A33/13 - LYME DISEASE PREVENTION UPDATE
Summary of the 2012 Lyme disease prevention activities carried out by
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and regional public health
partners.
Moved by: Vincent Crisanti
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT the summary report'Tick Surveillance and Lyme Disease Prevention 2012"be
received;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff continue to incorporate
updated information on Lyme disease and blacklegged ticks (Ixodes scapularis) into the
TRCA Employee Health and Safety training and visitor information systems in order to
increase awareness;
AND FURTHER THAT staff continue to liaise with the regional public health units in the
regions of Peel, Durham and York, and the City of Toronto.
CARRIED
55
BACKGROUND
Recently there has been increased awareness and concern raised over the issue of Lyme
disease and the ticks that are known to carry and transmit the disease to humans. This has
been the result of media coverage of several local high profile cases of the disease in the last
few years. In 2012, TRCA acknowledged the seriousness of the increase in the incidence of
Lyme disease, and the potential implications to the organization:
• TRCA is one of the largest landowners in the Toronto region, and its properties include
large areas of natural lands;
• many TRCA staff work in the field, therefore these staff might have increased exposure
to ticks, and ultimately Lyme disease;
• many visitors use and enjoy TRCA facilities such as conservation areas, field centres
and resource tracts, thus their potential exposure to ticks increases;
• partnership with the vector-borne disease divisions of regional public health units had
been established through TRCA-s West Nile virus monitoring and surveillance program
and these staff are now incorporating Lyme disease into their various communication
approaches.
Based on the above, it is clear that this issue should be part of TRCA-s due diligence, and the
first line of defense in this regard should be to increase public awareness and to incorporate
the information on Lyme disease into the organizations Employee Health and Safety training
and visitor information systems.
At Authority Meeting #5/12, held on June 22, 2012, Resolution #A102/12 was approved:
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be directed to regularly
incorporate updated information on Lyme disease and blacklegged ticks (Ixodes
scapularis) into the TRCA Employee Health and Safety training and Visitor information
systems;
THAT staff be directed to make information on Lyme disease and blacklegged ticks
available at all field centres, conservation areas and other TRCA facilities in order to
increase the awareness of visitors;
THAT staff continue to liaise with the regional public health units in the regions of Peel,
Durham and York, and the City of Toronto to receive up-to-date information on this issue
and share surveillance data regarding Lyme disease and blacklegged ticks;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff be directed to explore the possibility and feasibility of
identifying ticks found on TRCA properties, and to submit any blacklegged ticks found to
the Zoonotic Diseases and Special Pathogens National Microbiology Laboratory.
In this regard, a summary report has been prepared that outlines the activities carried out by
TRCA related to the approved recommendations in 2012. The report can be used as a Health
and Safety reference, since it brings together the current status of Lyme disease in TRCA's
jurisdiction and information on the programs and activities conducted by TRCA staff and our
regional public health partners.
56
What is Lyme disease?
Lyme disease is one of the most common vector-borne diseases of humans in the world. The
disease is named after the Town of Lyme (Connecticut, USA), where a number of cases were
identified in 1975. Lyme disease is caused by a bacterium, Borrelia burgdorferi, which is
typically transmitted by certain ticks to a wide range of birds, reptiles and mammals including
dogs and humans. The primary transmitter of Lyme disease in Ontario is blacklegged tick,
Ixodes scapularis. Blacklegged ticks live in wooded, brushy areas that provide the humidity
ticks need to survive. Exposure to ticks may be greatest in the woods (especially along trails)
and the fringe area between the woods and the edge of the forest. Blacklegged ticks search for
a host from the tips of low-lying vegetation and shrubs, not from trees. Blacklegged ticks do not
jump or fly; they grab onto their animal hosts that brush against vegetation, and then they crawl
around to find a place to bite.
In about 80% of cases, early Lyme disease is characterized by a skin lesion, which expands to
a diameter of more than 5 cm from the site of the tick bite. The signs and symptoms of early
Lyme disease also include fever, headache, muscle/joint pain and fatigue. If left untreated, the
disease can progress to swelling of the joints from arthritis in one or more joints, problems with
the nervous system, and persistent weakness and fatigue. Though rare, Lyme disease can be
fatal. Recent studies suggest that the incidence of Lyme disease in Canada is increasing. As Dr.
Nicholas Ogden from the Public Health Agency of Canada wrote in his report "projected
increases in temperature with climate change are expected to permit and accelerate the
expansion of Ixodes scapularis into Canada."
The prevalence of human Lyme disease in Ontario and Canada
In 2009, Lyme disease became a nationally reportable disease in Canada. This means that all
health care professionals should report cases of Lyme disease to the Public Health Agency of
Canada (PHAC). The Agency also surveys the provinces and territories to assess the number of
cases and distribution of Lyme disease in Canada.
The risk for exposure to the disease is highest in regions where the ticks that transmit Lyme
disease are known to be established. In Ontario, these regions include southern and eastern
Ontario. Established populations of blacklegged ticks have been found at Point Pelee National
Park, Rondeau Provincial Park, Long Point Provincial Park, Turkey Point Provincial Park, Turkey
Point lowlands, Wainfleet Bog Conservation Area, Presqule Provincial Park, Prince Edward
Point National Area, St. Lawrence Islands National Park and Charleston Lake Provincial Park.
Across Canada, these ticks can be found in southern and southeastern Quebec, southeastern
Manitoba, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia as well as much of southern British Columbia.
Surveillance data indicates a small number of blacklegged ticks are introduced into widely
separated areas of Canada by migratory birds, posing some risk that individuals in other areas
may also be exposed to infected ticks.
What are the Public Health Agencies doing to address Lyme disease?
Public Health Agency of Canada scientists continue to collaborate in studying the occurrence
of tick populations in Canada. These studies show there is low risk of encountering ticks
infected with the Lyme disease agent in most of Canada although the number of risk areas is
increasing in eastern Canada. Many of these findings have been published and reported at
scientific meetings to help increase awareness of the potential for Lyme disease to occur in
Canada.
57
In addition, scientists from Public Health Agency of Canada and York University are currently
researching the potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of the ticks that carry
Lyme disease. This research will contribute to our understanding of the occurrence of the ticks
and the disease-causing agents they transmit.
To address Lyme disease, the regional public health units focus on educating the public about
Lyme disease and carry out various forms of surveillance. Educational material provided
includes information on the identification of ticks, signs and symptoms of the disease, personal
preventative measures for reducing exposure to ticks and advice on how to safely remove and
report an attached tick. The various forms of surveillance include the following:
• "Human cases surveillance' which involves investigating every report of Lyme disease
received. The standard investigation includes confirming the diagnosis, collecting
demographic data, determining location of exposure and investigating possible links
among cases. This has been accomplished by completing the Ministry of Health and
Long-Term Care Lyme Disease Human Case Investigation Report.
• "Passive surveillance"which involves assessing ticks submitted by the public for the
presence of the disease in Ontario.
• "Active surveillance"which involves monitoring for tick populations in selected locations
within their region.
The following is a summary of the various tick surveillance activities and results in 2012 by
regional health units.
York Region
Two confirmed positive Lyme disease human cases were reported in York Region, however
these were travel-related cases. Through the passive tick surveillance, 16 ticks were submitted
and three specimens were identified as blacklegged ticks. No blacklegged ticks collected
through passive surveillance tested positive for the Borrelia burgdorferi. Active tick surveillance
was conducted by York Region in summer and fall of 2012 in 12 locations. No ticks were found.
Peel Region
Eight human cases of Lyme disease were reported. Two of these cases were acquired locally.
This was the first year that Lyme disease was locally acquired in Peel Region. In 2012, Peel
Public Health received 20 ticks from the public. Five blacklegged ticks were identified and one
was found locally. Peel Region has received two lab reports from PHAC indicating that two ticks
were positive for Borrelia burgdorferi, the other three ticks were negative. The ticks that tested
positive were from New York state and Prince Edward County in eastern Ontario. Peel Public
Health conducted active tick surveillance in two areas where there was suspected tick
exposure. These surveillance activities did not identify any additional ticks.
Durham Region
Two confirmed positive Lyme disease human cases were reported and one more case is under
investigation. Durham Region Health Department received 23 ticks from the public, eight of
which were identified as blacklegged ticks. None of these specimens tested positive for Borrelia
burgdorferi. Durham Region Public Health conducted active tick surveillance in June, along the
Whitby Lakeshore and in a ravine area in Whitby. No ticks have been found as a result of active
surveillance in Durham Region.
58
City of Toronto
Toronto Public Health investigated 22 confirmed and probable Lyme disease cases in 2012. All
of these cases reported travelling to Lyme disease endemic areas within or outside of Ontario.
Five blacklegged ticks were submitted for testing in 2012, and only one tested positive for
Borrelia burgdorferi. The City of Toronto did not conduct any active tick surveillance in 2012.
Activities undertaken by TRCA in 2012
Further to the approved recommendations, TRCA staff completed the following actions:
• TRCA incorporated Lyme disease related information in our Health and Safety training and
information;
• educational posters on Lyme disease were obtained from regional health units and
displayed in field centres, conservation areas and TRCA offices in order to increase the
awareness of TRCA staff and visitors;
• staff participated in all of the active tick surveillance surveys conducted by York Region on
TRCA properties including Kortright Centre, and Boyd and Bruce's Mill conservation areas;
and
• staff prepared a summary report"Tick Surveillance and Lyme Disease Prevention -2012".
The report is available on TRCA's corporate website.
What can staff and the public do to prevent Lyme disease?
The precautions recommended by the public health agencies to reduce the risk of Lyme
disease include to:
• wear long sleeved shirts, long pants and closed shoes;
• apply insect repellents containing DEET;
• perform a careful self-inspection for attached ticks after being in wooded areas. A daily
total-body inspection and prompt removal of attached ticks (within 24 hours) can reduce
the transmission of the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi from infected ticks. Blacklegged
ticks are very small, particularly during the nymph stage, so careful examination is
necessary. Children and pets should be checked as well;
• carefully remove attached ticks using tweezers. Grasp the tick's head and mouth parts
as close to the skin as possible and pull slowly until the tick is removed. Do not twist or
rotate the tick and try not to squash or crush the tick during removal;
• contact a health professional immediately if you develop symptoms of Lyme disease,
especially when you have been in an area where blacklegged ticks are found.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Staff has added the issue of ticks and Lyme disease to TRCA's health and safety training to
raise awareness of all employees, and in particular those that will be working in the field.
Additional information that has been developed by the regional health units will be used, and
this includes suggested preventative measures, information on tick identification and removal,
and what to do if bitten by a tick at work. The same information will be used to inform visitors to
TRCA facilities to ensure a consistent approach and up-to-date information and advice. Clearly
TRCA is not the experts on the disease or the insects that carry/transmit it, and as such it is
expected that TRCA should use the most up-to-date information that is available from the
agencies that are on the front line of existing and emerging health issues in the province.
59
Staff in the Ecology Division has the capacity to identify ticks to species (using the staff and
resources TRCA currently applies to the West Nile Virus Surveillance and Monitoring Program)
and will identify any tick(s) submitted by staff from TRCA properties. If blacklegged ticks are
found, the specimens will be forwarded to the Zoonotic Diseases and Special Pathogens
National Microbiology Laboratory for further testing. Ticks submitted by the general public will
not be accepted, the inquiries will be re-directed to the appropriate public health unit.
Staff has reviewed the feasibility of monitoring, following the "active surveillance"approach.
Staff is recommending that TRCA plays a "supporting' role in active surveillance conducted by
regional public health units.
Staff will also explore the need for and feasibility to adapt signage on TRCA properties to
incorporate information on the potential presence of ticks and the Lyme disease issue where
appropriate.
Lastly, staff will continue to respond to public inquiries regarding blacklegged ticks and Lyme
disease and staff that is presently involved with TRCA's West Nile virus monitoring and
surveillance program will use the various regional health department committees as sources of
information on the Lyme disease issue, and will communicate important updates to other staff.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Most of the awareness activities can be undertaken within the scope of TRCA's existing Health
and Safety and facility management approaches. Additional costs associated with monitoring,
property management, tick control activities or updates to signage used at TRCA properties or
facilities will need to evaluate on a case-by-case basis.
Report prepared by: Jessica Fang, extension 5665
Emails:jfang @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Jessica Fang, extension 5665
Emails:jfang @trca.on.ca
Date: March 6, 2013
RES.#A34/13 - CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE
Implementation of Draft Canada Goose Management Strategy for the City
of Toronto
Moved by: Vincent Crisanti
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT the Draft Canada Goose Management Strategy for the City of Toronto be circulated
to agencies and City of Toronto staff for review and comment;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) work with City of Toronto,
Canadian Wildlife Service and stakeholders to implement the strategy for 2013;
60
THAT the Draft Canada Goose Management Strategy for the City of Toronto be used as
the foundation for a TRCA-wide Canada Goose Management Strategy;
TRCA continue to implement TRCA's Canada Goose Management Program on Lake
Ontario waterfront sites and several inland lakes and parks throughout the TRCA
jurisdiction;
THAT TRCA staff be directed to establish a jurisdiction wide Canada Goose Management
Committee composed of partnering municipalities, agency stakeholders, and interest
groups.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
By the end of the 19th century, Canada Goose populations were near extinction due to
excessive hunting and capture for market. From 1900 to 1975 many efforts were undertaken to
re-establish and support Canada Goose population across southern Ontario. These included
protection strategies, captive breeding programs, re-introductions, and restrictions on hunting
seasons for geese.
After 1975, goose populations in southern Ontario showed a rapid increase. The recovery of the
Canada Goose population is viewed as one of the most successful wildlife re-establishment
programs to date. Subsequently, all levels of government switched from programs targeting
protection, to initiatives that targeted population management and that minimized property
damage.
These population increases were most significant in urban and suburban environments
throughout North America. The urban populations of the Canada Goose continue to grow in the
GTA, and landowners and municipalities struggle with many conflict issues including
aesthetics, excessive droppings, vegetation damage, beach fowling, public safety concerns
and possible water quality concerns.
TRCA, in partnership with its member municipalities, have been involved in many Canada
Goose focused initiatives since 1993. These include:
• waterfront waterfowl counts;
• strategic landscape planning to deter geese;
• nesting Canada Goose banding program;
• resident population control programs (egg oiling);
• goose relocation programs;
• goose management committees and working groups.
An ad hoc multi-agency goose management committee was established for the GTA in 1993 to
review issues and develop strategies for reducing conflict situations between the hyper
abundant goose population and residents of the GTA. In 1995, TRCA in partnership with the
City of Toronto began a comprehensive approach to address goose populations within the
City. Since then the City of Pickering, Town of Ajax, City of Brampton, Region of York and
Region of Peel have also been incorporated into the Canada Goose Management Program. To
date the program has focused on three main initiatives:
1. Habitat Modification to prevent Canada Goose conflict;
61
2. Canada Goose Egg Oiling Program;
3. Canada Goose Relocation Program.
Through the Canada Goose Management Program, TRCA has also participated in many other
initiatives and is seen as a leader in addressing Canada Goose management and conflict
resolution. Since 2002, TRCA has summarized the Canada Goose Management Program in an
annual report as per the following resolutions:
Resolution #A16/03:
THAT the 2002 Goose Management Program Report be endorsed;
THAT TRCA staff be directed to continue to pursue the program with area municipalities;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA send a letter to local waterfront businesses in the area
affected by significant goose populations advising them of the goose oiling program and
requesting their financial assistance with the program.
Resolution #A13/08:
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be directed to continue
pursuance of the Canada Goose egg oiling and bird relocation programs with partnering
municipalities and agencies;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff be directed to continue participating in the Transport
Canada Greater Toronto Area Canada Goose Steering Committee.
Most recently, at Authority Meeting #11/12, held on January 25, 2013, Resolution #A272/12
was approved as follows:
THAT staff report back on TRCA-s Canada Geese program, including impacts of Canada
Geese on water quality in the TRCA jurisdiction, at Authority Meeting #2/12, scheduled
to be held on March 22, 2013.
2012 TRCA's Canada Goose Management Program Highlights
The 2012 Canada Goose Management Program was implemented across the TRCA
jurisdiction. The annual report summarizes the success of this program and is available upon
request. Highlights of the program include:
• Canada Goose nests were found at 26 of the 29 sites visited. Field staff visited sites
during spring migration, nesting, summer moult and fall migration to understand the
seasonal movements and behavioural patterns of geese.
• On average goose numbers and conflict issues are decreasing at sites within the
management program. Problem sites are identified and management activities are
coordinated with municipal staff, which contributes to effective management.
• On average fewer nests are found per site, which indicates that management
techniques are effective in reducing production. If left unchecked, the population is
expected to dramatically increase.
62
• Egg oiling was found to be effective in preventing eggs from hatching. A total of 210
nests containing 955 eggs were treated as part of local population management.
• From 2007 to 2012, 9,797 Canada Geese have been relocated from Toronto.
Monitoring activities indicate that a significant number of geese migrate to Toronto
during their moulting period. Relocation removes problematic birds from the safe-haven
of Toronto during peak public use periods at waterfront parks. The number of geese
requiring relocation is decreasing.
TRCA is working with research agencies, wildlife experts and member municipalities to
understand the implications of water quality and Canada Geese. Information to date suggests
that Canada Geese are not related to high e-coli levels; however, continued management to
reduce the goose population will address local water quality issues, if they exist.
The Canada Goose Management Program has seen achievements in traditional areas of high
goose populations, including the Toronto Islands, Eastern Beaches, Marie Curtis Park, Humber
Bay, Western Beaches, Ontario Place, Ashbridges Bay, Bluffers Park, the Ajax waterfront and
sites along the Humber River, which have seen significant improvement in recent years. In
general, fewer Canada Geese are nesting and loafing in these goose conflict areas; however,
an emerging area of concern is the utilization of stormwater management facilities by nesting
geese. This is most prevalent in surrounding municipalities, which are now experiencing an
increase in Canada Goose conflicts.
Based on the success of the Canada Goose Management Program, the City of Toronto
provided special funding to develop and deliver a Canada Goose Management Strategy for the
City of Toronto. In 2010 and 2011 the Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS) partnered with TRCA
and provided funding to assist in the development of a Canada Goose Management Strategy
for the City of Toronto. The goal of the strategy is to develop a comprehensive and coordinated
approach to holistically address goose conflict issues across the entire City of Toronto.
To complete the strategy, TRCA established a Canada Goose Management Steering
Committee composed of TRCA Restoration Services staff and City of Toronto Parks, Forestry
and Recreation staff. The Committee hosted a GTA wide Canada Goose Management
workshop for all member municipalities, stakeholders, and interest groups to assist in the
development of the Toronto based strategy.
The draft Canada Goose Management Strategy for the City of Toronto is available on request
and makes the following key recommendations:
• continue with existing TRCA Canada Goose Management Program;
• complete priority area management plans;
• improve public and municipal staff awareness and education;
• improve land uses management, and greenspace design;
• continue with habitat modifications to deter geese and reduce conflict;
• improve bylaw enforcement around feeding waterfowl;
• improve monitoring and understanding of local populations;
• implement priority area management plans;
• establish a jurisdiction wide Canada Goose Management Committee to facilitate the
development of a TRCA wide Canada Goose Management Strategy.
63
RATIONALE
In general, Canada Goose numbers are still increasing within GTA parklands. North Americas
current Canada Goose population is estimated at over 4.3 million and continues to increase.
Conflict, or perceived conflict, remains high among the public. The proliferation of stormwater
management facilities across the region creates potential nesting sites that can increase the
population. While society has made great improvements in landscape design considerations,
the landscape is still dominated by highly desirable goose feeding sites, and the potential for
goose conflict situations are still increasing.
Goose conflict issues are arising in other GTA municipalities and management is not consistent
between municipalities. The need for a comprehensive and coordinated approach is essential
to address goose conflict across the TRCA jurisdiction. Geese are highly mobile and
management in one area may cause conflict in another.
The existing TRCA Canada Goose Management Program has been successful within the City of
Toronto; in general fewer Canada Geese are nesting and loafing in traditional goose conflict
areas within the city. However, key problem areas still remain, and numbers would quickly
increase if management ceased.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The existing TRCA Canada Goose Management Program has been successful, however a
city-wide strategy will coordinate management approaches and facilitate appropriate
communication that would aid in the understanding of goose populations within the city,
achieve better management and reduce human-goose conflicts.
1. Continue with existing TRCA Canada Goose Management Program: Activities of the
existing TRCA Canada Goose Management Program are focused on Lake Ontario
waterfront sites and several inland lakes and parks throughout the jurisdiction. It
consists of egg oiling for population control and the removal and relocation of geese
during the moulting season to areas outside of Toronto.
2. Implement the Canada Goose Management Strategy for the City of Toronto: A
coordinated and comprehensive approach to management that includes the following
recommendations:
• Complete Priority Area Management Plans - Site specific management plans are
required to ensure that the site level issues are addressed. Each priority area will
have specific objectives regarding Canada Geese, and techniques will be focused to
achieve the objectives.
• Improve public and municipal staff awareness and education - Public awareness
and education is a core recommendation of the Canada Goose Management
Strategy to address issues that contribute to Canada Goose conflict. TRCA staff will
inform and educate the public, municipal park managers, park staff and park
planners about Canada Goose issues
• Improve by law enforcement-TRCA will work with the City to improve enforcement
of waterfowl feeding bylaws, and will contribute to public education and awareness
to deter people from feeding geese.
64
• Improve monitoring and understanding of local populations-The Canada Goose
Management Strategy recommends that the monitoring program be expanded by
adding more stations during key periods to understand the movements and
behaviours of local populations.
• Implement Priority Area Management Plans - Implementation of the Priority Area
Management Plans will directly manage Canada Geese within the Priority Areas.
3. Establish a jurisdiction-wide Canada Goose Management Committee which will ensure
that a well-rounded, coordinated approach to management is undertaken. The
committee will be comprised of representatives from the public, municipal stakeholders,
agency experts and interest groups and will meet annually to review management
activities and collaborate on adaptive management scenarios.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Special project funding was provided from the City of Toronto and the Canadian Wildlife
Service for the development and delivery of a Canada Goose Management Strategy for the City
of Toronto. Capital funding from the City of Toronto, Region of Peel, Region of York, City of
Pickering and Town of Ajax is identified to continue with the Canada Goose Management
Program. Funds are identified in the Goose Management Program Budget 114-32.
Report prepared by: Ralph Toninger extension 5366, Karen McDonald extension 5248 and
Danny Moro extension 5372
Emails: roninger@trca.on.ca, kmcdonald @trca.on.ca, dmoro @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Ralph Toninger, extension 5366
Emails: roninger@trca.on.ca
Date: March 11, 2013
RES.#A35/13 - EAST DUFFINS HEADWATERS MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE
Approval in principle of the East Duffins Headwaters Management Plan
Update.
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT the draft East Duffins Headwaters Management Plan Update, dated March 2013 be
approved in principle;
THAT the draft Plan be circulated to the Township of Uxbridge, the City of Pickering and
the Region of Durham requesting endorsement of the Plan;
THAT following circulation, staff report back to the Authority to confirm endorsement of
the final Plan;
65
AND FURTHER THAT staff proceed to implement the Management Plan Update priority
projects in partnership with project stakeholders.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The East Duffins Headwaters (EDH) is a group of conservation lands totaling over 1,400 ha in
the Region of Durham. These lands sit between Brock Road and Lakeridge Road along the
Uxbridge-Pickering Townline. Over 1,100 ha of the study area is made up of largely intact forest
and as a whole, the properties represent some of the most unspoiled lands in the Greater
Toronto Area. All the properties in the EDH are located within the Oak Ridges Moraine and
make up valuable parts of the headwaters of not only the Duffins Creek watershed but also the
Lynde Creek, Pefferlaw River and Lake Scugog watersheds. Further underscoring the
environmental significance of the property, the EDH intersects with major sections of both the
Uxbridge Kames Environmentally Sensitive Area and the provincially designated Uxbridge Glen
Major Forest Area of Natural and Scientific Interest. The area is home to several regional
species of concern and Ontario Species at Risk.
The Duffins Creek Headwaters Management Plan for Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) properties, which included the EDH study area was completed in 2003. In that
plan it was recommended that a review and update of the management plan occur every five to
seven years. Since that time, many changes have occurred on the properties that led to the
need for this update: three major parcels of land and several smaller parcels of land have
increased the holdings in the area by 34%; visitation and public use on the EDH properties has
substantially increased; and several major restoration efforts have been completed on the
properties.
At Authority Meeting #8/08, held on October 24, 2008, Resolution #A237/08 directed TRCA
staff to establish a project steering committee and a public advisory committee to assist with
the completion of the East Duffins Headwaters Management Plan Update. A copy of the draft
Management Plan Update is available for review online on the following website
www.trca.on.ca/enjoy/locations/east-duffins-headwaters.dot
Printed copies of the draft Management Plan Update will be available at the Authority meeting.
Management Plan Update and Consultation
The planning process was undertaken in three phases with input and guidance from two
separate committees, a staff steering committee and a public advisory committee. The staff
steering committee consisted of TRCA staff from a range of different internal divisions. The
public advisory committee was made up of representatives from the local municipalities,
community groups, agencies, local stakeholders, as well as local area residents and
landowners. The pubic advisory committee was provided a terms of reference document that
was used to guide their contributions throughout the development of the master plan. All
management plan components were either reviewed or contributed to by both the staff steering
committee and the public advisory committee.
Phase one of the plan update included the development of the advisory committees,
preparation of a property background report, a site securement and protection report. Phase
two included the establishment of the management zones, the management recommendations,
trail plan and site securement plan. Phase three consisted of the trail plan, site securement and
general management plan finalization.
66
Phase One
• update property inventories including natural heritage data, geo-reference trail locations,
cultural heritage data, forest management data, restoration opportunities information and
site securement data;
• establish staff steering groups and a management plan advisory committee and host
meetings;
• update plan vision, goals and objectives;
• establish and circulate a study newsletter;
Phase Two
• review and update management zones;
• integrate updated watershed management recommendations;
• develop a site securement and protection plan including public use and hazard
management;
• review and update an overall trail plan for the properties including plans for emergency
response;
• host staff steering and advisory committee meetings;
• circulate a study newsletter update;
• host one public meeting to review draft material.
Phase Three
• review and update management recommendations;
• finalize draft management plan document;
• finalize site securement and protection plan;
• finalize trail plans;
• host staff steering and advisory committee meetings;
• host public meeting to present final draft plan;
• obtain partners and TRCA board endorsement and / or approval of the plan;
• circulate a study update newsletter.
Vision, Goals and Obiectives
During the Management Plan Update process for the EDH, a vision, a goal and a series of
objectives were developed to guide the management of the properties. These statements will
provide not only immediate direction on how the lands will be managed but will also provide a
filter for future decision making on the properties.
Vision
As part of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-s vision for The Living City, the East
Duffins Headwaters properties will be a model for achieving biodiversity protection,
enhancement and management on a provincially significant landform while providing for
sustainable, healthy and enjoyable public experiences.
Goal
To protect, enhance and steward the EDH properties to achieve watershed integrity and
biodiversity in an engaged community, ensuring overall sustainability and public enjoyment.
67
Obiectives
In addition to the larger Vision and Goals established for the properties, six additional
objectives in the following themes were developed to help further guide management decisions
on the ground:
Natural Heritage
To protect existing key natural heritage features and restore the natural ecosystem by ensuring
the integrity and diversity of native species, habitats, landscapes, hydrological integrity and
ecological processes. Ensure the connection of natural heritage features to one another and to
adjacent areas;
Cultural Heritage
To identify and, where appropriate, protect the cultural heritage features for their inherent value
and depiction of the long-term human use and occupancy of the area;
Land Use
To ensure protection of the ecological integrity and cultural values of the land through
innovative planning, increase in protected lands, management and appropriate conservation,
recreation and other land uses;
Education
To encourage knowledge and understanding of the natural and cultural values of the land and
water, their protection and management requirements, as well as their significance, sensitivities
and interrelationships;
Stewardship
To encourage and facilitate the ongoing public involvement towards a partnership that will
foster sustainable living, and will accomplish watershed management objectives, as well as
implement Management Plan recommendations;
Public Use
To provide opportunities for appropriate and accessible public uses, which are consistent with
all other objectives.
Management Recommendations
Management recommendations provide actions to achieve the vision and goal set forth for the
property. Key management recommendations include:
Natural Heritage Protection
• Monitor flora and fauna in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
• Ensure continuance of monitoring initiatives already in place, and expansion of these efforts
where gaps exist
• Ensure all management work occurs during appropriate times to minimize impacts on the
vegetation, breeding birds, and dispersing or migrating amphibians.
Terrestrial Invasive Species
• Work with the forthcoming TRCA invasive species management strategy to develop a
property specific invasive control plan.
• Implement best management practices in the management of invasive species on the site.
68
Species of Concern
• Obtain all necessary regulatory permits and approvals required under governing Acts and
Regulation prior to commencing any implementation activities, including restoration work
and trail development.
Restoration
• Undertake restoration projects that will positively impact all other terrestrial natural heritage
indicator categories (e.g. patch size and shape, connectivity, and matrix influence).
• Restoration activities should be site appropriate, based on hydrology, soil conditions,
topography, historical cover, and how they contribute to the natural system of the area with
the aim at improving species diversity, and the natural function of the site.
Cultural Heritage
• Identify, Protect and conserve all archeological sites within the EDH Lands.
• Engage Aboriginal communities with regards to any significant Aboriginal archaeological
findings on site.
Trails
• Allow for low impact trail uses such as hiking, cycling, horseback riding, snowshoeing,
cross-country skiing, wildlife viewing, and on-leash dog walking within permitted trail
corridors only.
• Continue to allow and improve connections between the EDH and adjacent or near
adjacent public lands.
• Support and manage the Oak Ridges Trail and the Trans Canada Trail on EDH properties.
• Work with local and regional emergency service providers to address any safety concerns
and address issues limiting their response time within the trail system
Social
• Continue to work with the Glen Major and Walker Woods Stewardship Committee whose
main function is to oversee, comment on and assist in the implementation of the
management plan recommendations
• Engage local residents and community groups in stewardship programs that will improve
the EDH and foster community stewardship.
Economic
• Explore opportunities to partner on project implementation with the Township of Uxbridge,
the City of Pickering, the Regional Municipality of Durham, local community groups and
other interested stakeholders.
Trail Plan
The trail plan for the EDH will focus on providing a safe, enjoyable and educational full season
trail system for a balanced mix of permitted trail uses. The trail plan will be managed with an
environment first approach. Permitted uses will include low impact trail uses that are consistent
with the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan.
69
Some of the features included in the trail plan are approximately 100km of mixed use trails that
will feature eight parking areas and primary trail heads to allow public access to the property.
Emergency routes will be established in partnership with local emergency services providers
and approximately 100 post markers will provide visitors to the properties with clear legible way
finding through the properties. An updated trail guide and map will be developed to reflect the
changes in the trail system on the ground.
The trail plan within the EDH will also continue to provide linkages to both regional and local
trails offsite via the Oak Ridges Trail and the Trans Canada Trail. The connections and trail
improvements recommended in the trail plan will continue to highlight the EDH properties as a
key component in the Township of Uxbridges designation as the trails capital of Canada.
RATIONALE
The EDH Management Plan Update was developed in consultation with the Township of
Uxbridge, the City of Pickering and the Region of Durham. All municipal members on the
advisory committees had the opportunity to review and comment on all the plan components
and recommendations. Additionally, public interest groups and stakeholders were involved
throughout the planning process and they have expressed their support for the plan.
The EDH Management Plan Update is consistent with TRCA strategic plans and documents, as
well as Ontario policy and provincial plans, municipal Official Plans and Secondary Plans.
The Update addresses the increased responsibilities necessary to ensure that the property
remains a model for conservation management in the Greater Toronto Area. The EDH
Management Plan Update will move TRCA towards its vision for The Living City, ultimately
helping to provide for sustainable communities based on a healthy ecosystem.
The EDH Management Plan addresses property management and public safety issues, site
securement, vegetation management, cultural heritage and stewardship objectives, as well as
responds to future demands for nature based recreation opportunities in the region.
The plan establishes a framework for appropriate environmental protection and restoration
techniques, facilitates public input regarding appropriate use and future management of the
EDH properties. The update is also consistent with the recommendations outlined in:
• A Watershed Plan for Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek (2003)
• the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (2003)
• the Ontario Greenbelt Plan (2005); and
• the Ontarios Places to Grow (2006) program.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The successful implementation of the EDH Management Plan Update will require the efforts of
TRCA and its partners.
TRCA will take the following actions:
• Circulate the draft plan that has been approved in principle by the Authority to the municipal
Councils of the Township of Uxbridge, the City of Pickering and the Region of Durham for
endorsement.
70
• Request that the Township of Uxbridge, the City of Pickering and the Region of Durham
include the Management Plan Update in their respective jurisdictions planning and land
use policies and practices for the area.
• Publish and distribute the East Duffins Headwaters Management Plan Update to relevant
stakeholders and seek necessary consultation.
• Continue to work with the Glen Major and Walker Woods Stewardship Committee and trail
captains program to assist with the implementation of the master plan.
• Plan to implement the Management Plan Update recommendations with the project
partners and stewardship committee.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The total cost to implement the Management Plan Update is estimated at$2,375,000 over 15
years. A summarized implementation budget for the management plan is shown on
Attachment 1. These are preliminary estimates and timelines are subject to discussion with the
potential funding partners for refinement of project requirements.
Staff has projected that 84% of the total project costs ($2,375,000) can be directed towards the
following TRCA accounts: 109-06, 005-10 and 408-45. Funding for restoration will be secured
prior to commencing restoration works. Staff will be approaching the Township of Uxbridge,
the City of Pickering, local community groups and other interested stakeholders to share in the
cost of plan implementation and restoration over the next fifteen years. Staff estimate that the
project timeline would need to be extended by an additional 4-5 years if additional funds cannot
be secured.
Report prepared by: Adam Szaflarski, extension 5596
Email: aszaflarski @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Adam Szaflarski extension 5596, Mike Bender, extension 5287
Email: aszaflarski @trca.on.ca, mbender @trca.on.ca
Date: March 22, 2013
Attachments: 1
71
Attachment 1
Management Plan Update Implementation Budget Summary
Item Deliverables Anticipated
Cost($)
Phase 1, Years 1-5 (2013-2017)
Operations Property Maintenance, Hazard Tree Removal and Trail $512,000
Maintenance, Community Outreach
Site Securement and Building assessment and securement, boundary fencing,
Protection Plan high priority encroachments $88,000
Trail Plan Trail closures , Parking Lot Installation and expansion, $158,000
Updated Signage and Trail Guide,
Natural and Cultural Develop Property Specific Invasive Management Plan and $15,000
Heritage Begin Implementation
Restoration* North Walker Woods Aggregate Site, To be
Townline Culvert Repair, Forestry determined*
Total Phase 1 $773,000
Phase 2, Years 6-10 (2018 -2022)
Operations Property Maintenance, Hazard Tree Removal and Trail $540,000
Maintenance, Community Outreach
Site Securement and Boundary Audit, Fencing Repairs, Boundary Signage $77,000
Protection Plan
Trail Plan North Walker Woods Parking Lot,Anticipated Trail $200,000
Improvements, Trail Guide Update and Printing, Interpretive
Trail
Restoration* Additional Uxbridge North Lands Implementation (if To be
needed) , Other Restoration Opportunities as they Arise, determined*
Forestry
Total Phase 2 $817,000
Phase 3, Years 11-15 (2023-2027)
Operations Property Maintenance, Hazard Tree Removal and Trail $593,000
Maintenance, Community Outreach
Site Securement and Boundary Audit, Fencing Repairs, Boundary Signage, $82,000
Protection Plan Building Removal
Trail Plan Pleasure Valley Parking Lot, Anticipated Trail Improvements $110,000
(Pleasure Valley Accessible Trail)
Restoration* Forestry work and additional restoration opportunities as To be
they are identified or as they arise determined*
Total Phase 3 $785,000
Total Project Cost(Phases 1-3) $2,375,000
*Costs for restoration projects will be estimated upon completion of detailed site restoration plans
72
RES.#A36/13 - ENERLIFE CONSULTING INC. AGREEMENT
Annual renewal of agreement.
Moved by: Vincent Crisanti
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be directed to renew the
agreement for the development and delivery of sector based energy management
programs with Enerlife Consulting Inc. for the period, April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2014, at
an approximate cost of$254,000.00, and the same terms and conditions as the existing
agreement;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized officials be directed to take the necessary action to
implement the agreement including the signing and execution of documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #5/07, held on June 22, 2007, Resolution #A145/07 was approved as
follows:
THAT approval be granted for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to
enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)with Enerlife Consulting Inc. for the
development and delivery of key programs for The Living City, including Mayors-
Megawatt Challenge, Greening Health Care, Sustainable Schools, Home Energy Clinic
and the Community Scorecard;
THAT appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may
be required to give effect thereto including the signing of documents;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to report back to the Authority on an annual basis,
with an update on the status of the business relationship.
TRCA began working with Enerlife Consulting Inc. in 2002 when they were contracted to assist
in the development of programs for The Living City Centre. In 2007, TRCA entered into a formal
business relationship with Enerlife Consulting to develop and deliver sector based energy
programs. Five programs were identified in the original agreement and include: Mayors'
Megawatt Challenge; Greening Health Care; Sustainable Schools; Home Energy Clinic and
Community Scorecard.
73
The working relationship with Enerlife Inc. has been quite successful. Although some of the
programs are no longer active, the approach to building performance management developed
through this relationship has influenced the development of other significant initiatives. These
initiatives include the Canada Green Building Councils GREENUP program, the Real Property
Association of Canada's "20 by 15" national energy consumption target for office buildings, as
well as the Greening Greater Toronto "Race to Reduce"for building landlords and tenants. In
addition, the Greening Health Care program has continued to expand to more than 35 hospitals
participating in Ontario, 12 from Alberta and another nine in New Brunswick. The Mayors'
Megawatt Challenge also remains active with six municipalities participating including, Toronto,
Mississauga, Brampton, Richmond Hill, Caledon, Barrie and Oshawa. In addition, in 2013 the
Mayors' Megawatt Challenge launched the Town Hall Challenge 20 by 15. This is a challenge
to municipalities across Canada to reduce the energy use in the city and town halls to 20
equivalent kilowatt hours of energy use per square foot by the end of 2015.
The agreement with Enerlife is reviewed on an annual basis following the evaluation of the
success of the programs, to ensure the agreement is still appropriate for the current
circumstances. Feedback from the program steering committee members has indicated that
the programs provide significant value and that more should be done to foster collaboration
and increase membership. In addition, in discussion with Enerlife Consulting it was agreed that
the programs were continuing to transform approaches to energy efficiency in the target
sectors. For example, based on the conservation potential for the hospitals in the Greening
Health Care program, it is estimated that there is a potential for more than $100 million in
annual energy cost savings in the Ontario hospital sector. In addition, the Town Hall Challenge
pilot was able to engage 60 municipalities across Canada and has been used to redesign the
Mayors' Megawatt Challenge for a Canada-wide launch in 2013.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The agreement is due to expire on March 31, 2013. With Authority direction, staff will renew the
agreement for an additional year. In 2012 an addendum was made to the Agreement to include
Sustainable Schools in Schedule A. The revised Schedule will be included in the 2013-2014
contract.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Revenues for the program are derived from membership fees charged to municipalities and
hospitals participating in the programs as well as utility companies that pay to sponsor the
programs. TRCA manages the program while Enerlife provides the technical content and
support. TRCA collects all revenues generated and pays Enerlife monthly for their portion of
the work. The budget for payment to Enerlife for 2013 under the agreement is estimated to be
$254,000 if program membership and sponsorship projections are met. Under the agreement,
Enerlife billing cannot exceed the available revenue. Thus, if revenue projections are not met,
Enerlife billing would be reduced accordingly. TRCA keeps a portion of the revenue to cover
program management expenses.
Report prepared by: Bernie McIntyre, extension 5326
Emails: bmcintyre @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Bernie McIntyre, extension 5326
Emails: bmcintyre @trca.on.ca
Date: February 27, 2013
74
RES.#A37/13 - MEADOWCLIFFE DRIVE SLOPE STABILIZATION PROJECT
Contract RSD13-017. Award of Contract RSD13-017 for the supply and
delivery of approximately 4,000 tonnes of 75mm-200mm beach cobble
stone.
Moved by: Vincent Crisanti
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT Contract RSD13-017 for the supply and delivery of approximately 4,000 tonnes of
75mm-200mm beach cobble stone to the Meadowcliffe Drive Slope Stabilization Project,
in the City of Toronto, be awarded to Nelson Aggregate Co. for a total unit price of$25.90
per tonne and a total cost not to exceed $103,600.00, plus a 10% contingency to be
expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid meeting Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;
THAT should staff be unable to achieve an acceptable contract with the awarded supplier,
staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the other
suppliers that submitted quotations, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority specifications;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take all necessary actions
to implement the foregoing, including the signing and execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project is located along a portion of the Lake Ontario
shoreline at the base of the Scarborough Bluffs west of Bellamy Ravine, in the City of Toronto.
The purpose of the project is to provide long-term shoreline protection to reduce the impacts of
wave energy, stabilize slopes, enhance natural processes and protect the residential properties
on the top of the slope. As a result, risk to public safety and infrastructure will be reduced,
passive recreational opportunities will be increased, and aquatic and terrestrial habitat
conditions will be improved.
The preferred option determined through the Class Environmental Assessment process is a
shoreline treatment consisting of a cobble stone beach retained by four headlands, and an
earth berm at the east end of the shoreline to provide enhanced erosion protection for the
eastern most properties.
The beach cobble stone material will be used for the construction of Beach Cell One.
RATIONALE
Tender RSD13-017 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo
http://www.biddingo.com/) on Monday, February 11, 2013, and Request for Quotation
packages were sent to 27 suppliers as follows:
75
• Brent Quarries ; • A& R Geosynthetics;
• B-Town Group; • Anthony-s Excavating Central Inc.;
• CDR Youngs Aggregate Inc.; • Dale Ottewell Construction & Logging Ltd.;
• Dufferin Aggregates; • Elirpa Construction & Materials Ltd.;
• Brock Aggregates; • Greens Haulage;
• Fowler Construction; • Latitude 67 Limited;
• Glenn Windrem trucking; • Titanium Contracting Inc.;
• J.C. Rock Limited; • Canada Building Materials Company;
• James Dick Construction; • Bot Construction;
• Lafarge Aggregates; • Greenwood Construction;
• Miller Group; • All Stone Quarry;
• Nelson Aggregate Co.; • TBG landscape Inc.;
• R.W. Tomlinson Ltd.; • Rock Valley Natural Stone Inc.
• Strada Aggregates;
The Tender Opening Committee opened tenders on Friday, February 22nd, 2013 with the
following results:
Contract RSD13-017- Supply and Delivery of Approximately 4,000 tonnes of
75mm-200mm Beach Cobble stone.
TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL VALUE OF
BIDDERS PER TONNE CONTRACT
(Plus HST) (Plus HST)
Nelson Aggregates Co. $25.90 $103,600.00
Dufferin Aggregates $28.39 $113,560.00
Cambridge Aggregate Services Inc. $30.50 $122,000.00
Fowler Construction Company Ltd. $32.24 $128,960.00
Glenn Windrem Trucking $34.95 $139,800.00
Dale Ottewell Construction & Logging Ltd. $35.00 $140,000.00
TBG Landscape Inc. $35.00 $140,000.00
James Dick Construction $40.55 $162,200.00
Brock Aggregates Inc. $42.69 $170,760.00
Rock Valley Natural Stone Inc. $43.88 $175,520.00
Based on the bids received, staff recommends that Nelson Aggregate Co. be awarded Contract
RSD13-017 for the supply and delivery of approximately 4,000 tonnes of 75mm-200mm beach
cobble stone for the unit cost of$25.90 per tonne and a total amount not to exceed
$103,600.00, plus HST, it being the lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications. The contract is
subject to a 10% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff.
76
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available within account#145-01 from the Toronto Erosion Capital Budget.
Report prepared by: Jordan Budway, 416-392-9721
Emails:jbudway @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702
Emails:jdickie @trca.on.ca
Date: February 25, 2013
RES.#A38/13 - FRENCHMAN'S BAY WATERFRONT MASTER PLAN
City of Pickering. The recent update and revision to the Frenchman's Bay
Waterfront Master Plan was accepted by the City of Pickering on
November 12, 2012 and requires Authority approval.
Moved by: Vincent Crisanti
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT the Frenchman's Bay Waterfront Master Plan be approved;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be directed to work with
the City of Pickering to look for external project partners and funding sources to assist
with the implementation of the Frenchman's Bay Waterfront Master Plan;
THAT staff work with the City of Pickering and park stakeholders to prepare detailed
designs in preparation for construction;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Pickering be so advised .
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Frenchman-s Bay is one of the largest embayment coastal wetlands on the north shore of Lake
Ontario and is ecologically significant both locally and regionally. Frenchman's Bay West is one
of many TRCA properties within Frenchman-s Bay and represents a unique and significant
combination of forests, beaches and wetland habitats. In 2002 TRCA, City of Pickering and the
local community developed a master plan for the Frenchman's Bay West property that focused
on habitat restoration, recreation and defining and delineating park infrastructure. In 2012, the
City and TRCA revised the plan to include the Frenchman-s Bay waterfront including a number
of initiatives like the new harbour entrance project, additional available parkland at the tip of the
western spit, and the park opportunities on the east spit of Frenchman's Bay. In addition, the
dogs off leash area proposed in the 2002 plan was removed to reflect the needs and concerns
of the local community. Since 2002, a number of park projects have been implemented
including the decommissioning and reforestation of Buenavista Drive, dune restoration and
waterfront trail construction.
77
Master Plan Components
The Frenchman's Bay Waterfront Master Plan focuses on the following components:
• Meadow Coastal Wetland and Dune Enhancements
The cottonwood marram grass ecological land classification unit found along the
Frenchman-s Bay waterfront is one of the most significant shoreline ecosystems within the
TRCA jurisdiction. Best management efforts have been identified to expand the extent of
this habitat and improve the integrity of existing communities.
• Fish Habitat Improvements
Extensive fish habitat components have been identified as part of this master plan update.
A major focus is on the recreation of historical wetland features along the north side of the
west spit. In addition shoreline shoals, structural fish habitat, logs, rootwads and other
aquatic habitats have been designed as shoreline attributes throughout the area. Fish
habitat components are targeted at improving the fish community within the bay and
nearshore lake Ontario shoreline.
• Vehicle Access Termination and Parkina
A great deal of effort has been directed at balancing the projected use of the park area and
the layout and extent of parking within the park. The Beachfront Promenade Road will be
improved to accommodate a lay by parking facility. Lay by parking is designed to
accommodate projected parking requirements while still providing functional vehicle
circulation and access within the park. The lay by parking is also a terminus of formal
vehicle access, after which a single park road extends from the lay by parking to the boat
launch canoe club area. Public vehicular access will terminate at a small parking area at
the boat launch area; this parking area is intended for short term parking, barrier free
parking and drop off. The existing road east of the boat launch area will be
decommissioned and turned into a vehicle free area and pedestrian boardwalk.
• Boat Launch
The existing boat launch area will be formalized and will have a single launch ramp and
dock facility, which is intended to provide small boat (less than 20 ft), canoes and kayak
launching. This boat launch area is designed to facilitate appropriate access and control
and limit the type and size of watercraft that access the bay.
• Dockina Facilities
The Master Plan update includes a docking area that could accommodate a small scale
boat to ferry pedestrians and cyclists from the two sides of the bay during the summer
months.
• Public Washrooms and Pickerina Rouae Canoe Club Storaae Facility
Public washrooms and change facilities are proposed as part of a storage facility for the
Pickering Rouge Canoe Club. The Storage facility will be located at the boat launching area
and will provide a centralized area of boating activities and public facilities. The existing
canoe club facility will be decommissioned and re-naturalized as a beach dune.
78
• Public Consultation
The original 2002 Master Plan was developed with support and input from the local
community. As part of the Master Plan Update public meetings were held on March 3, 2012
and May 19, 2012, respectfully, a total of 125 people and 80 attended the two meetings. A
number of revisions were made to the plan in response to this public consultation. The
Master Plan was also presented for approval to Pickering Council on November 12, 2012,
and a number of delegates from the community spoke to the project.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Implementation of the Frenchman Bay Waterfront Plan is scheduled to proceed once the
harbour entrance project is completed. Construction can start as early as 2014 and will be
implemented as a three phased approach.
• Phase One activities include: Upgrades to Beachfront Promenade including lay by parking,
paving and lighting; construction of a pedestrian trail; main entrance signage; trail head to
Waterfront Trail; and access gate.
• Phase Two activities include: Boardwalk to harbour entrance; small craft boat launch;
decking at boat launch; wetland shoreline and dune restoration; and site works associated
with the public washrooms/change rooms.
• Phase Three activities include: Trail construction; park furniture; interpretive area; and site
restoration.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The implementation of the Frenchman-s Bay Waterfront Master Plan has been included in the
City of Pickering-s 5 Year Capital Budget. A total of$3.3 million has been allocated to a three
year phased budget in order to manage and facilitate construction. Phase one works total
$900,000, phase two works total $1,900,000 and phase three works total $500,000.
Report prepared by: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246
Emails: gmacpherson @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246
Emails: gmacpherson @trca.on.ca
Date: March 11, 2013
Attachments: 1
79
Attachment 1
\-e.in, -
'' I vi. r! € �' ii
=1"- dRG'��aI,pl FIl�li �alf��lll! t a II
9�f, l P it iP!illlll 11J RE -13
,•
r,
2 w 1
f VIII 4'6[F?9°`I #1
i illr° II1alit
IMP
.I__ 5__ 4Y, $ t
�` r j 9 ! g
k - �Y �1 it 10
Kx'^yr,,ti'2'f3 I
0
vi it i`i
k`t,� [ X91
V.Sy
® J 9,
1
'''V.,,>,_- k
�9
I a &
a
AI I
Iii �ilr. `2,1",1-11% ,z,\
,, °,I _
r 'm.9s 4 IRE
6 } Mali! i#
1i iii
j h
Me.i', , + <4 �a. ,a, „a - ll
,,i tj O ; " \[ld
m p S.<
yy
� t .j11
: ,5 ),,;4i.d"r 1, ) +mow fi `z—),.`,,
.= rirnna
80
RES.#A39/13 - FRENCHMAN-S BAY HARBOUR ENTRANCE PROJECT, TENDER
RSD13-021
Award of Contract RSD13-021 for dredging works of the Frenchman-s
Bay Harbour Entrance Channel, City of Pickering, Region of Durham.
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Dave Ryan
THAT Contract RSD13-021 for dredging works of the Frenchman-s Bay Harbour Entrance
Channel be awarded to Galcon Marine Ltd. for the total cost not to exceed $152,860.00,
plus HST, as they are the bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) specifications;
THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of 25%
of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized and directed to take all necessary actions to
implement the foregoing, including the signing of documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 2008, the City of Pickering working in partnership with TRCA, initiated the Frenchman-s Bay
Harbour Entrance Class Environmental Assessment (EA). The purpose of this project is to
create a safe harbour entrance that supports the marine function of the Bay, while preserving or
enhancing the ecological conditions. Through the EA process, the preferred design was
developed that consisted of two breakwater structures running perpendicular from the east and
west spits of the harbour entrance, thus improving navigability.
Ongoing sediment deposition within the harbour entrance channel poses navigation problems
for boats and the channel currently does not meet the minimum standard requirements to allow
for safe navigation between Lake Ontario and Frenchman-s Bay. Therefore immediate dredging
works is required to improve navigability and create a safe harbour entrance channel.
RATIONALE
Tender RSD13-021 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo
http://www.biddingo.com/) on Friday, February 15, 2013 with a mandatory site information
meeting held on Thursday, February 21, 2013. Tender packages were sent to 12 contractors
as follows:
• Catalina Excavating Inc.;
• Dean Construction Company Ltd;
• Elirpa Construction;
• Galcon Marine Ltd;
• Geo-Dredging;
• Mcpherson Andrews;
• Metric Contracting Services Company;
• Newalta;
• Ontario Construction;
• Richardson Workboats;
• Somerville Construction; and
• Titanium Contracting Inc.
81
The Tender Opening Committee opened the tenders on Friday, March 1, 2013 with the
following results:
Contract RSD13-021—Frenchman-s Bay Harbour Entrance Channel Dredging
BIDDERS TOTAL TENDER AMOUNT
(Plus HST)
Galcon Marine $152,860.00
Ontario Construction Company Ltd. $180,925.00
Catalina Excavating Inc. $188,850.00
Dean Construction Company Ltd. $303,300.00
Metric Contracting Services Company $329,000.00
Newalta $334,480.00
Restoration Services staff reviewed the bid received from Galcon Marine Ltd. against its own
cost estimate and have determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the
requirements and deliverables as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by
TRCA staff of Galcon Marine Ltd.'s experience and ability to undertake similar projects was
conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that Galcon Marine
Ltd. is capable of undertaking the scope of work.
Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Galcon Marine Ltd. be awarded Contract
RSD13-021 for the supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for dredging works
for the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance for a total amount not to exceed $152,860.00, plus a
25% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid
that meets TRCA specifications.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds to undertake the Frenchman-s Bay Harbour Entrance Project are 100% recoverable from
the City of Pickering, further to the Memorandum of Understanding.
Report prepared by: James Dickie, 416-393-9702
Emails:jdickie @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-393-9702
Emails:jdickie @trca.on.ca
Date: March 04, 2013
RES.#A40/13 - APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO WATERSHED COMMITTEES,
2013-2015
Don Watershed Regeneration Council, Humber Watershed Alliance and
Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition. The formal appointment of
watershed residents and representatives from municipal and public
agencies, community groups, businesses and academic institutions.
82
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan
THAT the appointment of members to the Don Regeneration Council, as set out in
Attachment 1, be approved;
THAT the appointment of members to the Humber Watershed Alliance, as set out in
Attachment 2, be approved;
AND FURTHER THAT the appointment of members to the Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds
Coalition, as set out in Attachment 3, be approved.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority meeting #9/12, held on November 30, 2012, Resolution #A223/12 was approved,
in part, as follows:
...AND FURTHER THAT a report be submitted to the Authority identifying the proposed
membership for each of the watershed subcommittees for approval.
The Terms of Reference for the Don Regeneration Council, the Humber Watershed Alliance and
the Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition dated November, 2012 were approved at Authority
Meeting #9/12, held on November 30, 2012. Section 5 of the Terms of Reference states that:
"Members will be appointed for a two-year term with a possible extension for one more
year. The membership will be reviewed on an annual basis. Members, excluding
ex-officio members, unable to fulfill their commitments will be replaced after missing
three consecutive meetings (without notice) by the Authority based on the nominees
recommended by TRCA staff.
Notice of resignations and recommendations for new members will be presented to the
Authority on an "as required" basis for approval."
The opportunity for membership on the Don Watershed Regeneration Council, the Humber
Watershed Alliance and the Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition was widely advertised in
newspapers and posted on various websites, volunteer networks and through press releases.
As well, letters were sent to regional and local municipalities, public agencies and community
groups, businesses and academic institutions requesting that they appoint a delegate to each
of the watershed groups. TRCA hosted a very successful webinar on the evening of January 30,
2013 at which 87 people participated. TRCA staff as well as past and current members of all
three watershed subcommittees were present to answer the questions that arose and to speak
to their experience on the watershed subcommittees.
The Terms of Reference make provision to have 15 watershed residents on the Don Watershed
Regeneration Council, 20 residents on the Humber Watershed Alliance and 15 residents on the
Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition.
83
The Selection Committee, consisting of each of the watershed specialists, the Director,
Watershed Management and former members of each of the watershed groups, held interviews
in late February to consider possible candidates. To date, the individuals listed in Attachments
1, 2 and 3 are recommended for appointment to the Don Regeneration Council, Humber
Watershed Alliance and Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition for the 2013-2015 term. Some
municipalities, agencies and community groups were unable to make appointments in time for
preparation of the staff report. As a result, additional appointments will be brought to the
attention of the Authority for approval once they are confirmed by their respective councils,
agencies or groups.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
• Confirm the remaining members of the Don Regeneration Council, the Humber Watershed
Alliance and the Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition;
• Schedule and host the inaugural meetings of the Don Regeneration Council, the Humber
Watershed Alliance and the Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition in April, 2013.
Report prepared by: Lia Lappano, extension 5292
Emails: Ilappano @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Adele Freeman, extension 5238
Emails: afreeman @trca.on.ca
Date: January 23, 2013
Attachments: 3
84
Attachment 1
Don Watershed Regeneration Council 2013-2015 Membership
TRCA REPRESENTATIVE
Authority Member I John Parker
REGIONAL AND LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES AND COMMUNITY COUNCIL
REPRESENTATIVES -
MUNICIPALITY NAME
Town of Markham Valerie Burke
Town of Richmond Hill Brenda Hogg
City of Toronto —East York Community Council Janet Davis
City of Toronto — North York Community Council John Parker
City of Toronto —Scarborough Community Council Paul Ainslie
City of Vaughan Sandra Racco
Regional Municipality of York Brenda Hogg
PUBLIC AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES
ORGANIZATION NAME
Environment Canada, Restoration Programs Laud Matos
Ministry of the Environment To be determined
Ministry of Natural Resources To be determined
COMMUNITY GROUPINGO REPRESE IITATIVES
GROUP NAME
Don Mills Residents Inc., Terry West
Evergreen Melissa Yu
Friends of the Don East John Routh
Pomona Mills Park Conservationists Naadia Ahsan
Richmond Hill Naturalists Lloyd Helferty
Royal Ontario Museum David Ireland
Toronto Field Naturalists Gerald Sigal
Toronto Green Community Lacey Williams
York Region Environmental Alliance Susan Sigrist
BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVES
BUSINESS NAME
Fundraising Stephanie Thorson
Professional Engineering Consultant Antony Niro
Sustainable Agriculture Antonio Gomes
85
ACADEMIC INSTITUTION REPRESENTATIVES
SCHOOL NAME
University of Toronto Heather Wray
York University Heather Wright
WATERSHED RESIDENT REPRESENTATIVES
REPRESENTING MUNICIPALITY NAME
Town of Richmond Hill Shishir Handa
City of Toronto Margaret Bream
City of Toronto Margaret Buchinger
City of Toronto Margaret Casey
City of Toronto Nicole Czorny
City of Toronto Katheryne Daradal
City of Toronto John Hough
City of Toronto Celeste Longhurst
City of Toronto Clare Mitchell
City of Toronto Jake Schabas
City of Toronto Sabrina Ternier
City of Toronto Iris Tufa
City of Toronto Andy Wickens
City of Vaughan Tim Hayward
City of Vaughan Michelle Louli
86
Attachment 2
Humber Watershed Alliance 2013-2015 Membership
TRCA REPRESENTATIVE
Authority Member I Richard Whitehead
REGIONAL AND LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES AND COMMUNITY COUNCIL
REPRESENTATIVES
MUNICIPALITY NAME
Township of Adjala-Tosorontio Sam Keenan
City of Brampton Michael Hoy
Town of Caledon Nick deBoer
Township of King Debbie Schaefer
City of Mississauga Dianne Douglas
Town of Mono Bob Mitchell
Regional Municipality of Peel Patti Foley
Town of Richmond Hill Greg Beros
City of Toronto - North York Community Council Maria Augimeri
City of Toronto -Toronto-East York Community Council Gord Perks
City of Toronto - Etobicoke-York Community Council Sarah Doucette
City of Vaughan Marilyn lafrate
Regional Municipality of York Deborah Schulte
PUBLIC AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES
ORGANIZATION NAME
Environment Canada Mark Chambers
Ministry of Environment To be determined
Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Bert Duclos
Ministry of Natural Resources To be determined
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs To be determined
87
COMMUNITY GROUP/NGO REPRESENTATIVES
GROUP ' NAME
Albion Hills Community Farm Barb lmrie
Architectural Conservancy of Ontario Bob Hulley
Black Creek Conservation Project To be determined
Bolton Community Action Site Jerry Gorman
Humber Arboretum & Centre for Urban Ecology Lynn Short
Humber Heritage Committee Lisette Mallet
Humber Valley Heritage Trail Association To be determined
Kleinburg Area Ratepayers Association Sid Preece
La Societe d-+iistoire de Toronto Rolande Smith
Mount Dennis Community Association Mike Mattos
Toronto Off Road Bicycle Association Chris Svirklys
York Region Environmental Alliance Sharon Bradley
ACADEMIC INSTITUTION REPRESENTATIVES
SCHOOL NAME
Seneca College To be determined
WATERSHED RESIDENT REPRESENTATIVES
REPRESENTING MUNICIPALITY NAME
City of Brampton Marisa Jokelainen
Town of Caledon Heather Broadbent
Town of Caledon Petra van Limburg-Meijer
Township of King Ron Hingston
Town of Richmond Hill Jim Bradley
City of Toronto Yuestas David
City of Toronto David Hutcheon
City of Toronto Annette Maher
City of Toronto Volker Masemann
City of Toronto Madeleine McDowell
City of Toronto Roy Murray
City of Toronto Emily Pennington
City of Toronto Matthew Smith
City of Toronto Katie Stammler
City of Toronto Dawit Worku
City of Vaughan lain Craig
City of Vaughan Matthew Volpintesta
City of Vaughan Barry Westhead
88
Attachment 3
Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition 2013-2015 Membership
TRCA REPRESENTATIVE
TRCA Chair I Gerri Lynn O'Connor
REGIONAL AND LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES AND COMMUNITY COUNCIL
REPRESENTATIVES
MUNICIPALITY NAME
City of Brampton Susan Jorgenson
Town of Caledon Gord McClure
City of Mississauga Michael Gusche
Regional Municipality of Peel Allan Thompson
City of Toronto —Etobicoke York Community Council Peter Milczyn
PUBLIC AGENCY REPR ESENTATIVES.. . .... ... _
ORGANIZATION NAME
Environment Canada Jon Gee
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs To be determined
Ministry of Environment To be determined
Ministry of Natural Resources To be determined
COMMUNITY GROUP/NGO REPRESENTATIVES
GROUP NAME
1st Etobicoke Central Scouting Groups Ted Rouse
Credit Hills Scouts Daniel Millard
Citizens Concerned About the Future of the Etobicoke Brian Bailey
Waterfront
Friends of Heart Lake Leo O'Brien
Humber Bay Shores Angela Brooks
Toronto Food Policy Council Peter Mitchell
Sierra Club —Peel Region Rosemary Keenan
Rockwood Homeowners Association Joe Silva
West Humber Naturalists Bob Noble
BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVES
BUSINESS NAME
Greater Toronto Airports Authority Derek Gray
SHARP Canada Eddie Colacchio
89
ACADEMIC INSTITUTION REPRESENTATIVES
SCHOOL NAME
Post Grad Student Brittanie Semper
Post Grad Student Kaitlin Kennedy
York University—Undergraduate Student Adam De Souza
WATERSHED RESIDENT REPRESENTATIVES
REPRESENTING MUNICIPALITY NAME
City of Brampton Jim Laird
City of Brampton Ron Fay
City of Brampton Chris McGlynn
City of Brampton David Laing
City of Brampton David Thomas
City of Toronto Suzanne Barrett
City of Toronto Debora Bielecki
City of Toronto Dennis Bradley
City of Toronto Marilyn Campbell
City of Toronto Marilyn Hagerman
City of Toronto Al Farrugia
City of Toronto Doug McRonney
City of Toronto Natalie Salkauskis
90
RES.#A41/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Etobicoke Creek Watershed
Deepbrook Developments Inc., CFN 48809. Purchase of property located
south of Mayfield Road, east of Colonel Bertram Road - Snelgrove, City of
Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, under the "Greenlands
Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Etobicoke Creek watershed.
(Executive Res.#B2/13)
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
THAT 0.06 hectares (0.16 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 17,
Concession 1 EHS and designated as Blocks 25 and 26 on a Draft Plan of Subdivision
prepared by Holdings Jones Vanderveen Inc., Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Job
No. 11-2134-MPLANI, dated December 4, 2012, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality
of Peel, located south of Mayfield Road, east of Colonel Bertram Road - Snelgrove, be
purchased from Deepbrook Developments Inc.;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the
lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest
possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A42/13 - GREEN LANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Carruthers Creek Watershed
John Boddy Development Ltd., CFN 48849. Acquisition of property
located west of Audley Road and south of Bayly Street in the Town of
Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham, under the 'Greenlands Acquisition
Project for 2011-2015', Flood Plain and Conservation Component,
Carruthers Creek watershed.
(Executive Res.#B3/13)
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
91
THAT 1.86 hectares (4.60 acres), more or less, of vacant land, being Part of Lot 13, Range
3 Broken Front Concession and designated as Block 180 on draft M-Plan prepared by
J.D. Barnes Limited, Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham, be purchased from
John Boddy Development Ltd.;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land
free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land
transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining all necessary approvals and the signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A43/13 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND
Adjacent to 163 Thistledown Boulevard, City of Toronto - Etobicoke York
Community Council Area, CFN 48216. Recommends that the
TRCA-owned property located adjacent to 163 Thistledown Boulevard,
City of Toronto - Etobicoke York Community Council Area, Humber River
watershed, be retained for conservation purposes.
(Executive Res.#B4/13)
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority(TRCA)-owned property located
adjacent to 163 Thistledown Boulevard, City of Toronto - Etobicoke York Community
Council Area, be retained for conservation purposes.
CARRIED
RES.#A44/13 - TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Conveyance of Land for the Reconstruction and partial Closure of Olde
Bayview Avenue, South of North Lake Road, Town of Richmond Hill,
Regional Municipality of York, CFN 44967. Receipt of a request from the
Town of Richmond Hill for conveyance of land for the reconstruction and
partial closure of Olde Bayview Avenue, south of North Lake Road, Town
of Richmond Hill,
Regional Municipality of York, Humber River watershed.
(Executive Res.#B5/13)
92
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority(TRCA) is in receipt of a request
from the Town of Richmond Hill for conveyance of land for the reconstruction and partial
closure of Olde Bayview Avenue, south of North Lake Road, Town of Richmond Hill,
Regional Municipality of York;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to
cooperate with the Town of Richmond Hill in this instance;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a parcel of TRCA-owned land containing 0.0005
hectares (0.001 acres), more or less, required for the reconstruction and partial closure of
Olde Bayview Avenue, said land being Part of Lot 6, Concession 2 EYS and designated as
Part 2 on Plan 65R-33975, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, be
conveyed to the Town of Richmond Hill;
THAT consideration be the nominal sum of$2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs to
be paid by the Town of Richmond Hill;
THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being
carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the Town of Richmond Hill;
THAT the conveyance of land be subject to a landscaping plan, subject to the approval of
TRCA staff;
THAT the Town of Richmond Hill is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from
injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly,
from this sale;
THAT said conveyance be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27, as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A45/13 - SUPPLY OF OPERATED HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND
DUMP TRUCKS
Tender RSD13-01. Award of Contract RSD13-01 for the supply of
operated heavy construction equipment and dump trucks.
(Executive Res.#B6/13)
93
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be authorized to have two
vendors of record for the supply of operated heavy construction equipment and dump
trucks for the period April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014;
THAT TBG Landscape Inc. be recognized as the primary supplier of operated heavy
equipment and dump trucks during the contract period, it being the proposal that best
meets the general requirements of TRCA at a competitive cost;
THAT Sartor& Susin Ltd. be recognized as the supplier of operated heavy equipment and
dump trucks on shoreline armouring, lakefilling and natural channel projects during the
contract period, it being the proposal that best meets TRCA's requirements for this
specialized work at a competitive cost;
THAT Sartor& Susin Ltd. be permitted to continue to supply operated heavy equipment
and dump trucks to projects already in progress until completion;
THAT where the vendors of record are not available for a particular project, staff be
authorized to use the next lowest bidder;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized officials be directed to take the necessary action to
implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents.
CARRIED
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES.#A46/13 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT Section II items EX8.1 - EX8.3, inclusive, contained in Executive Committee Minutes
#1/13, held on March 1, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
Section II Items EX8.1 - EX8.3. Inclusive
SOURCE PROTECTION PLANNING
(Executive Res.#B7/13)
MUD CREEK REACH 5 RESTORATION PROJECT- CULVERT EXTENSION
(Executive Res.#B8/13)
FRENCHMAN-S BAY HARBOUR ENTRANCE PROJECT EAST BREAKWATER CONSTRUCTION
(Executive Res.#B9/13 & Res.#B10/13)
94
SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
RES.#A47/13 - FRENCHMAN'S BAY HARBOUR ENTRANCE PROJECT
Funding Arrangement. A description of the funding arrangement for
Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Project.
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan
THAT the staff report describing the funding arrangement for the Frenchman's Bay
Harbour Entrance Project be received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Executive Committee Meeting #1/13, held on March 1, 2013, Resolution #B10/13 approved
the following amendment to the recommendation on Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance
Reconstruction Project:
...AND FURTHER THAT staff provide additional information on the funding arrangement at
Authority Meeting #2/13, scheduled to be held on March 22, 2013.
At Authority Meeting #8/12, held on October 26, 2012, Resolution #A187/12 directed staff to
enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Pickering to undertake the
Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Project. The City of Pickering had approved $3 million in its
2012 Park Capital Budget for the Project and the federal and provincial governments had
committed $6 million toward the Project.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
On July 1, 2012, the provincial and federal governments announced that they would each
contribute $3 million towards the Project. The City of Pickering share would be funded with $1.5
million from the Region of York as part of their Southeast Collector Enhancement package and
$1.5 million through an internal loan.
On November 5, 2012, City of Pickering Council Resolution #134/12 was approved, in part, as
follows (Attachment 1):
4. That Council authorize the (Acting) Division Head, Finance & Treasurer to finance
Phase 1 (west breakwater) and Phase 2 (east breakwater) of the project as provided
for in the 2012 Parks Capital Budget as follows:
a) a contribution from the Region of York, South East Collector Enhancement funds
in the amount of$1,500,000;
b) the City of Pickering' s share be changed from an external debt to an internal loan
in the amount of$1,500,000 for a term not to exceed 10 years; and at a rate to be
determined;
95
c) a Provincial Grant through Building Together, the Government of Ontario's
long-term infrastructure plan, in the amount of$3,000,000;
And Resolution #135/12 as follows:
That, upon having notification from the Government of Canada that it has approved
its funding contribution, the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an
amendment to the Infrastructure Funding Contribution Agreement to reflect the
Federal funding contribution of$3 million and proceed with phase 3.
TRCA and City of Pickering executed the Memorandum of Understanding on February 4, 2013
to undertake construction of the Project, based on the budget of$9 million.
Report prepared by: Connie Pinto, extension 5387
Emails: cpinto @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Connie Pinto, extension 5387
Emails: cpinto @trca.on.ca
Date: March 04, 2013
Attachments: 1
96
Attachment 1
City Special Council Meetin�� Minutes
Meeting
. ��K�n��ay' �8ove00��er 5, 2012
� _ �:��
-- p—'
Council Chambers
Present:
Mayor Ryan
Councillors:
K.Ashe
D. Dickerson
B. McLean
J. O'Connell
CL Pickles
P. Rodrigues
•
Also Present:
T. Provede| - Chief Administrative Officer
P. B' knn| - Director, Corporate Services& City Solicitor
T. K8alymuk -Director, OfOoa,ofSuotm nabi|ity
R. Holborn -Division Hmad, Municipal Property& Engineering
S. Karwowski -(Acting) Division Head, Finance&Treasurer
Q. Shields -City Clerk
A. Mostert -Coordinator, Landscape& Park Development
M. Gadzovski -Senior VVmbar Resources& Environmental Engineer
(I) Disclosure of Interest
No disclosures of interest were noted.
(II) Delegations
1. Frenchrnans Bay Harbour Entrance Reconstruction
Bernard Luttymer, 590 Liverpool Road. Pickering, Swans Manna Ltd., appeared
before Council in support of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance
Reconstruction and thanked the City for this project. He noted that he felt the
improvements would increase tourism in the area.
Jim Dike, Chair of the Waterfront Coordinating Committee, appeared before
Council in support of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Reconstruction.
He noted that he has seen other projects that TRCA have been involved tn and
felt confident that TRCA could do the job.
Gary Endicott, 11110 Sheppard Avenue Emod, Toronto, Pickering Auxiliary
Rescue Association, appeared before Council in support of the Frenchman's Bay
1
97
Harbour Entrance Reconstruction. He noted that the project will increase boater
safety.
Patricia van Zadel, 591 Liverpool Road, Pickering, appeared before Council in
support of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Reconstruction. She also
noted her appreciation of the funding support from all three levels of government.
Gary Peck, 591 Liverpool Road, Pickering, Fairport Yacht Club/Fairport
Frenchman's Bay Ltd_ appeared before Council in support of the Frenchman's
Bay Harbour Entrance Reconstruction and supported TRCA for project
management and construction services on the project.
Evanne Willson, a Pickering resident, appeared before Council in opposition to
this project. Ms. Willson noted that she swam at the beach regularly and
expressed her concerns about access to the beach during construction. Ms.
Wilson also noted her concerns regarding what the project will do to the quality
of the water. She stated that her questions regarding water quality have yet to be
answered and urged Council to reconsider the project until those questions were
answered.
Harold Hough, 591 Liverpool Road, Pickering, Pickering Harbour Company
Limited, appeared before Council in support of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour
Entrance Reconstruction and thanked Council for moving this project forward.
Denis Carrier, 974 Vistula Drive, Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Yacht Club,
appeared before Council in support of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance
Reconstruction and the engagement of TRCA for project management and
construction services on the project.
Larry Debono, 1684 Heathside Crescent, Pickering, appeared before Council in
support of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Reconstruction and thanked
Council for moving the project forward.
Keith Falconer, 710 Lublin Avenue, Pickering, President, Pickering East Shore
Community Association (PESCA), appeared before Council in support of the
Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance. He noted that PESCA has supported the
project since 2009 and he also thanked Councillor O'Connell and D. Steele for
the suggestion of making both sides fully accessible.
A question and answer period ensued.
Greg Greason, 72 Isabella Street, Suite 10, Toronto, Frenchman's Bay Yacht
Club, appeared before Council in support of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour
2
98
Entrance Reconstruction and the engagement of TRCA for project management
and construction services on the project.
David Steele, 966 Timmins Gardens, Pickering, appeared before Council to
express his concerns with the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance
Reconstruction project. Mr. Steele does not agree with the need for 2 piers and
thinks the yacht club and marina should pay some money to the project. Mr.
Steele does not think that the project should be sole sourced.
Bryan Buttigieg, 384 Woodgrange Avenue, Pickering, canoes in this channel on a
regular basis and does not believe it is safe for the larger boats, Mr. Buttiegieg
believes that TRCA is a suitable project manager for the project.
Brent Hughes, '964 Esse Crescent, Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Yacht Club,
appeared before Council in support of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance
Reconstruction and thanked the City for this project,
Paul White, 507 Cliffview Road, Pickering, President, Fairport Beach
Neighbourhood Association, appeared before Council in support of this project.
However, Mr. White would like the City to remain conscious of all the
environmental, construction and budgetary impacts of the project.
A Pickering resident appeared before Council in opposition to the project. He
does not believe that taxpayers were engaged enough in this project and would
like more community engagement. He noted his concerns with the project being
conducted and staged on the west side of the spit. He also questioned where
additional money would come from if the project went over budget.
A question and answer period ensued.
A Pickering resident appeared before Council in opposition to the project. She
does not believe that the residents of Pickering were adequately informed about
this project and their concerns have not been addressed. She feels the project
will increase pollution in the lake and questioned whether market research
studies had been completed.
A question and answer period ensued.
Marilyn Hedge, appeared before Council to express her concerns with this
project_ Ms. Hedge requested clarification on how an internal debt loan worked.
She questioned whether Pickering residents would be hired to work on the
project. She also noted her concerns with how the project would affect the water
3
99
quality and felt the piers were excessive and also questioned public safety when
on the piers.
Mary Humphrys, 926 Sunrise Avenue, Pickering, appeared before Council to
express her concerns with this project, She noted that she recognizes that
something has to be done for boater safety but is concerned with the scope of
the project. Ms. Humphrys questioned the budget process and asked if the City
had a plan in place in case the project goes over budget. She stated that she
would like to see shared investments and innovative funding solutions for this
project.
A question and answer period ensued.
Barbara Pulst, 909 Vistula Drive, Pickering, appeared before Council to express
her concerns with this project. Ms. Pulst would like the City to ensure that the
natural beauty of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour is maintained. She noted that
she felt TRCA was moving away from their mandate of conservation and the
environment and that they should be concentrating on that instead of
construction and project management. He stated her concerns were with sole
sourcing to TRCA and the estimated costs.
Mario Giorgio, The Waterfront Bistro, appeared before Council in support of the
Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Reconstruction. Mr. Giorgio felt the project
will increase the economy in the area.
Ian Hendy, 677 Marksbury Road, Unit 2, Pickering, appeared before Council and
noted he was not opposed to the project but was concerned with the construction
process of the project. He stated that he was opposed to any of the beach areas
being closed during construction and also noted his concerns with limited parking
during construction. He requested that the City look at different places to store
construction equipment and do everything they can to keep access to the beach
open.
Andre Pilon, 663 Chipmunk Street, Pickering, appeared before Council to
express his concerns with this project being constructed and managed on the
west shore. He questioned whether the City could look at other options for the
flow of equipment and traffic during construction. He questioned who would be
paying for future dredging of the area and noted his concern with the scope of the
project_
A question and answer period ensued.
4
100
(Ill) New and Unfinished Business
Director, Community Services, Report CS 38-12
Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Reconstruction
Resolution #134/12
Moved by Councillor Ashe
Seconded by Councillor McLean
1. That Report CS 38-12 of the Director, Community Services, regarding the
Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Reconstruction be received;
2. That Council approve engaging the services of TRCA as a sole source
purchase for project management and construction services for
reconstruction of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance in accordance with
the City's Purchasing Policy Item 09.04;
3. That Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Memorandum
of Understanding with the TRCA for the project management and
construction services for reconstruction of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour
Entrance, on such terms as are satisfactory to the Director, Community
Services and the Director, Corporate Services & City Solicitor;
4, That Council authorize the (Acting) Division Head, Finance & Treasurer to
finance Phase (west breakwater) and Phase 2 (east breakwater) of the
project as provided for in the 2012 Parks Capital Budget as follows:
a) a contribution from the Region of York, South East Collector Enhancement
funds in the amount of$1,500,000
b) the City of Pickering's share be changed from an external debt to an
internal loan in the amount of$1,500,000 for a term not to exceed 10
years; and at a rate to be determined;
c) a Provincial Grant through Building Together, the Government of Ontario's
long-term infrastructure plan, in the amount of$3,000,000;
5. That Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Infrastructure
Funding Contribution Agreement with the Province of Ontario on such terms
as are satisfactory to the Director, Community Services and the Director.
Corporate Services & City Solicitor, and
5
101
6. That the appropriate City of Pickering officials be authorized to take the
necessary actions to give effect thereto.
Carried Later in the Meeting
on a Recorded Vote
[Refer to following motions]
Resolution#135/12.
Moved by Councillor Dickerson
Seconded By Councillor Pickles
That recommendation #6 be renumbered to recommendation #7 and the following
recommendation be added as recommendation #6:
That, upon having notification from the Government of Canada that it has approved
its funding contribution, the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an
amendment to the Infrastructure Funding Contribution Agreement to reflect the
Federal funding contribution of$3 million and proceed with phase 3.
Carried
•
Resolution#136/12
Moved by Councillor O'Connell
Seconded by Councillor Rodrigues
That Council defer Report CS 38-12 until community consultation takes place with
the West Shore community to determine an appropriate construction plan to be
approved by Council.
Motion Defeated on
A Recorded Vote as follows:
Yes No
Councillor O'Connell Councillor Ashe
Councillor Rodrigues Councillor Dickerson
Councillor McLean
. Councillor Pickles
Mayor Ryan
The main motion was then Carried as amended on a Recorded Vote as follows:
6
102
Yes No
Councillor Ashe Councillor O'Connell
Councillor Dickerson Councillor Rodrigues
Councillor McLean
Councillor Pickles
Mayor Ryan
(IV) Confirmatory By-law
By-law Number 7247/12
Councillor Dickerson, seconded by Councillor McLean moved for leave to
introduce a By-law of the City of Pickering to confirm those proceedings of the
Council of The Corporation of the City of Pickering at its Special Meeting of
Council of November 5, 2012.
Carried
(V) Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 10:50 pm.
Dated this 5th day of November, 2012
Air
.... ......
Mayor
lie
. '
a MI A.AA,z) , ) .
Debbie Shields
City Clerk
103
RES.#A48/13 - FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
Summary of 2012 Requests. Provides a summary of requests under the
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan
THAT the report dated February 26, 2013, on summary of 2012 freedom of information
requests, be received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is subject to the Municipal Freedom of
Information and Protection of Privacy Act. TRCA is also subject to the provisions of the federal
Personal information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA).
Requests under the Act are dealt with by the Manager, Corporate Secretariat, who is
designated as TRCA's Information and Privacy Officer. Staff reports to the Information and
Privacy Commission annually on the number and type of applications received each year. The
activity in 2012 is summarized below.
RATIONALE
In 2012, TRCA received 61 requests for information under the Act. This continues the pattern of
an increasing number of requests over the past 10 years. In the period 2001 to 2006, TRCA
received fewer than five requests each year. From 2007 to 2011, the average was 23 annually.
In 2012 we saw an increase of 13 requests over 2011, from 48 to 61.
All of the requests related to "general records"as opposed to "personal information". The latter
relates to requests by individuals about information that TRCA has concerning the applicant
personally. Of the 61 requests for general information, 22 requests were from individuals and
39 from businesses.
Of the 61 requests received in 2012, 92%were responded to within the 30 day limit required
under the Act. Five requests took between 31 and 60 days. Extensions were needed cases
because of the volume of records to be searched and prepared.
Of the 61 requests, all information was disclosed in five situations; partial information was
disclosed in response to 24 requests; in 24 situations, no records existed so there was no
disclosure; and in eight situations, the request was withdrawn or abandoned. In 22 situations
where general information was disclosed, personal information was removed for privacy
purposes. Examples of the personal privacy exemption being applied include copies of
cheques which may be on file and personal telephone numbers.
In many cases, no records existed and the applicants were so advised. Also, TRCA receives
many requests about permit and planning applications which, once approved by the Executive
Committee, are a matter of public record.
104
The Act requires that a $5 fee be included with each application. Also, the Act allows TRCA to
charge for photocopies (20 cents/page) and search and preparation time ($30/hour). In 2012,
TRCA collected fees of$3,773.70.
Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
Date: February 26, 2013
RES.#A49/13 - SECTION IV- ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
Moved by: David Barrow
Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT Section IV item EX9.1 - Lowest Bid Not Accepted, contained in Executive Committee
Minutes #1/13, held on March 1, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
RES.#A50/13 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06 items (EX10.1 - EX10.45), inclusive, contained in
Executive Committee Minutes#1/13, held on March 1, 2013.
CARRIED
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 1:06 p.m., on Friday, March 22, 2013.
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/ks
105
MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #3/13
April 26, 2013
The Authority Meeting #3/13, was held in Weston Room B, Black C
on Friday, April 26, 2013. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, calle
9:32 a.m.
PRESENT
Paul AinslieMember
Maria AugimeriVice Chair
Ben CacholaMember
Bob CallahanMember
Ronald ChopowickMember
Vincent CrisantiMember
Glenn De BaeremaekerMember
Michael Di BiaseMember
Chris FonsecaMember
Jack HeathMember
Colleen JordanMember
Mujeeb KhanMember
Gloria Lindsay LubyMember
Glenn MasonMember
Mike MattosMember
Peter MilczynMember
Gerri Lynn O'ConnorChair
Linda PabstMember
Anthony PerruzzaMember
Dave Ryan
Deb SchulteMember
John SprovieriMember
Cynthia ThorburnMember
Jim ToveyMember
Richard WhiteheadMember
ABSENT
David BarrowMember
Raymond ChoMember
John ParkerMember
106
RES.#A51/13 - MINUTES
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #2/13, held on March 22, 2013, be ap
CARRIED
___________________________________
PRESENTATIONS
(a)A presentation by Mike Fenning, Senior Manager, Conservation Land
Services, TRCA, in regard to Land Acquisition.
(b)A presentation by Rocco Sgambelluri, Chief Financial Officer, in
- 2013 Budget, Operating and Capital.
A presentation by TRCA staff in regard to item AUTH7.1 - Toronto
(c)
Conservation Authority Strategic Plan - 2013.
RES.#A52/13 -PRESENTATIONS
Moved by:Maria Augimeri
Seconded by:Jack Heath
THAT above-noted presentation (a) be deferred to a future Author
CARRIED
___________________________________
RES.#A53/13 -PRESENTATIONS
Moved by:Maria Augimeri
Seconded by:Michael Di Biase
THAT above-noted presentation (b) be received.
CARRIED
___________________________________
RES.#A54/13 -PRESENTATIONS
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Ronald Chopowick
THAT above-noted presentation (c) be received.
CARRIED
___________________________________
107
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#A55/13 -TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY STRATEGIC
PLAN - 2013
Endorsement of Building The Living City, Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority Strategic Plan: 2013-2022.
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Ronald Chopowick
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff h
update to the TRCA Strategic Plan, has presented the plan, Build
the Authority at the Annual Authority Meeting in February of thi
opportunity for review and discussion by the members including a
meeting;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the final 2013-2022 Toronto an
Conservation Authority Strategic Plan be endorsed by the Authori
THAT staff be directed to develop and publish a formal document
communication of the Strategic Plan;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to implement the Strategic Pl
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #1/13, held on February 22, 2013, staff pres
Living City, the 2013-2022 Toronto and Region Conservation Autho
The Living City builds on Moving Toward The Living City, the pre
was approved by the Authority in 2006. It sets out TRCA strategi
decade. Members of the Authority were provided the opportunity t
and provide feedback at Authority Meeting #2/13, held on March 2
More than seventy TRCA staff members participated directly in th
which included a review of TRCAÔs current programs and the prior
as consultation with municipal staff and outside experts. Concu
Members, Building The Living City was presented to TRCA staff in
chaired by Brian Denney in which the draft plan was discussed an
comment. These sessions confirmed that staff largely supports t
Building The Living City and will continue to provide ideas and
Building on the success of the staff engagement process to devel
proposed that staff from across the organization work together t
practice immediately and ensure that the Plan is reflected in th
business plans and program planning. Over time, staff will monit
TRCA's actions internally and to our partners and will adjust TR
reflect lessons learned and new information, including a complet
within five years.
108
RATIONALE
The draft of Building The Living City, the 2013-2022 TRCA Strategic Plan, has
reviewed and discussed by the Members of the Authority and by TR
confirmed that the strategic directions outlined in the Plan are
principles, with the priorities of our municipal partners, and w
sustainability in the Toronto region. The implementation of the
years will:
focus activity on critical strategic issues and priorities;
align all parts of the organization around common goals;
increase efficiency, and reduce redundancy and conflict;
reveal opportunities to align TRCA strategies with those of muni
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Implementation of this plan could certainly be accelerated by th
financial resources but staff is sensitive to the fiscal realiti
partners. Beginning with the 2014 TRCA budget, negotiations wil
to execute the strategies described in the plan.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Adopt TRCA 2013 - 2022 Strategic Plan, Building The Living City.
Develop and publish formal document for communication of the pla
Integrate strategies into 2014 TRCA business planning process.
Align 2014 budget preparations with the strategies in the Plan.
Develop monitoring and reporting processes to assess effectivene
Review the full plan in five years, or earlier with cause to do
Report prepared by: Ryan Ness, extension 5615; Rick Sikorski, ex
Emails: rness@trca.on.ca, rsikorski@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Ryan Ness, extension 5615; Rick Sikorsk
Emails: rness@trca.on.ca, rsikorski@trca.on.ca
Date: April 15, 2013
Attachments: 1
109
Attachment1
Building The Living City
TRCA 10-Year Strategic Plan: 2013-2022 (Draft)
Presented at Authority Meeting #3/13 April 26, 2013
110
Contents
Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................3
Section 1: Where will this Strategic Plan take us? ...................................................................................4
Section 2: Guiding Principles .................................................................................................................... 6
Section 3: What challenges must we address? ........................................................................................8
Section 4: Strategic Directions ................................................................................................................ 11
LEADERSHIP STRATEGIES.................................................................................................................. 12
1.Green the Toronto region’s economy ..............................................................................................12
2.Manage our regional water resources for current and future generations.......................................13
3.Rethink greenspace to maximize its value ...................................................................................... 15
4.Create complete communities that integrate nature and the built environment ..............................15
5.Foster sustainable citizenship .........................................................................................................17
6.Tell the story of the Toronto region.................................................................................................. 18
ENABLING STRATEGIES ..................................................................................................................... 19
7.Build partnerships and new business models .................................................................................19
8.Gather and share the best urban sustainability knowledge ............................................................. 20
9.Measure performance .....................................................................................................................21
10.Accelerate innovation .................................................................................................................... 22
11.Invest in our staff ...........................................................................................................................23
12.Facilitate a region-wide approach to sustainability ........................................................................24
Section 5:Putting the Plan into action ...................................................................................................25
Section 6: This Plan builds on TRCA’s legacy ........................................................................................26
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 2
111
Introduction
This document, Building The Living City, lays out the strategic directions Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) intends to pursue for the 10 year period from 2013 to 2022. It
emphasizes our paramount commitment to safeguarding and enhancing the health and well-being of
the residents of the Toronto region through the protection and restoration of the natural environment
and the fundamental ecological services our environment provides. The central theme of this
commitment is expressed through our adoption and endorsement of The Living City vision – “a new
kind of community … where human settlement can flourish forever as part of nature’s beauty and
diversity.”
The Strategic Plan reaffirms our commitment to the enduring ideals that gave rise to Ontario’s
Conservation Authorities in the middle of the last century. Threaded through this document is a
steadfast commitment to wise land-use and the responsible management of natural resources, the
protection of life and property from natural hazards (such as flooding and erosion), collaboration with
our partners and the community, the empowerment of local initiatives, the importance of life-long
education, and the watershed-based approach to conservation.
Looking forward to the next 10 years of change and promise, TRCA seeks to fulfill its mandate and
apply its ideals to arrive at sensible answers to the new realities that are shaping the future of the
Toronto region – including a growing and evolving population, urban expansion, the impacts of climate
change, and economic changes unfolding both locally and on the global stage.
Over the next 10 years, TRCA and our partners in the community will continue working together to
realize The Living City vision in the Toronto region. We will work to restore the integrity and health of
the region’s rivers and waters. We will work to establish a regional system of natural areas that
preserves habitat, improves air and water quality, and provides opportunities for the enjoyment of
nature and outdoor recreation. And we will work to facilitate broad community support for sustainable
living and city-building that improves the quality of life for residents, businesses and nature.
We invite everyone to take an active role in building a healthy future for the Toronto region. Read this
Plan carefully, find your own place in it, and join us in putting the words on these pages into action. We
also invite our partners to look for opportunities to advance their own efforts at building a sustainable
future for the Toronto region through the work, expertise and resources offered by TRCA. We look
forward to working with you.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 3
112
Section 1: Where will this Strategic Plan take us?
In 2003, the Board of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) endorsed The Living City, a
vision based on our conviction that the future of the planet will be determined in rapidly expanding city-
regions.
Our vision is for a new kind of community, The Living City, where human settlement can
flourish forever as part of nature’s beauty and diversity.
The future health and well-being of the residents of the Toronto region depend on clean air, pure water
and wholesome local food supplies, on the integrity of natural systems, on access to greenspaces and
green jobs, and on vibrant sustainable neighbourhoods that meet the needs and support the aspirations
of their residents.
Over the next ten years, TRCA and our partners in the community will continue the work of
transforming the Toronto region into a Living City. By working to create a healthy and resilient
landscape, we will ensure the health and well-being of all residents of The Living City. But what will the
Toronto region look like 10, 20 or 100 years in the future? And how will it function?
In the year 2113, The Living City flourishes on the shores of Lake Ontario. Although the climate
has grown warmer, it is surprisingly pleasant in The Living City. Shade trees cover more than 30
per cent of the area, while gardens in backyards, community parks and on green rooftops supply
tasty local produce to residents. Green spaces and agricultural lands have been expanded,
protected and integrated into the community. Wildlife is diverse and native species thrive.
The air is clean and fresh – smog days are a thing of the past. The homes, businesses and public
buildings of The Living City are powered by solar, wind, biogas and other renewable sources.
People live in well-planned, human-scaled communities where they can walk or bike to work,
school and nearby greenspaces. Buildings are constructed of natural materials, designed in
harmony with the environment and the landscape. An efficient public transit system has replaced
traffic gridlock, and trains, buses and cars run clean and emission-free. All residents share the
benefits of The Living City, play an active role in its governance and feel responsible for its future
The water is clean and delicious. The lakes and rivers are swimmable, fishable and their waters
are easily treatable for drinking. Although intense storms have become more common, run-off is
returned to the soil or treated in constructed wetlands. Flooding is no longer a threat. Recycling
and reuse has replaced waste disposal. Organics are composted or digested. The Living City is a
part of nature and, like every natural organism, uses local energy sources wisely and efficiently
and returns them to the ecosystem when finished.
This vision of the Living City is firmly based on the four pillars of TRCA’s ongoing commitment to
healthy rivers and shorelines, greenspace and biodiversity, sustainable communities, and
business excellence. These remain relevant and have been updated to address changes -
most significantly the transitioning Ontario economy.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 4
113
The Four Pillars of The Living City
Healthy Rivers and
Water is used thoughtfully and efficiently, and the water in our rivers, streams
Shorelines
and waterfront is swimmable, fishable and easily treatable for drinking, even in
the most highly populated areas.
Despite our abundant supply of freshwater, we are a global leader in water
efficiency and innovation. Water from the potable distribution system will be
used almost exclusively for drinking and bathing.
Wastewater is minimized and stormwater is managed at source through low
impact development, on-site wastewater treatment technologies and green
infrastructure.
Greenspace and
A robust, resilient and equitably distributed system of green infrastructure – the
Biodiversity
urban forest, natural vegetation, soils and supportive green technologies (such
as stormwater management ponds, green roofs, permeable pavement and
rainwater harvesting containers) – provide ecological services to all residents of
The Living City.
Large and interconnected greenspaces offer a wide range of active and passive
recreational opportunities, while safeguarding their natural environmental
functions and providing suitable habitats for plant and animal species.
Land suitable for growing food is recognized and protected as a vital and
irreplaceable resource, providing locally sourced, affordable and healthy foods
to The Living City.
Sustainable
Well planned neighbourhoods provide easy access to employment, school,
Communities
recreation and amenities – on foot or by bicycle – and support a variety of
careers, lifestyles and income levels.
An interconnected, multi-modal transit system provides all residents, regardless
of income, with access to clean, fast and convenient transportation. Multi-use
transit corridors unite communities, eliminate gridlock and support a diverse mix
of transportation needs, including the need to move goods efficiently.
Governments, residents and businesses take responsibility for developing
renewable, locally-sourced energy, and for reusing and recycling materials. Per
capita energy use and waste generation totals are among the lowest in the
world.
Business Excellence, a
Residents are actively engaged in community life and empowered to make
Green Economy and
meaningful contributions to long-term ecological stability, improved human
Responsive Governance
health and well-being, and prosperity. They are able to connect easily and
mobilize quickly to address challenges and opportunities.
The region is viewed as a centre of innovation with a vibrant entrepreneurial
spirit and a responsive and adaptive regional economy, attracting skilled
workers from across the globe.
The economy will function at a more localized scale, with more goods and
services produced locally – even within neighbourhoods.
Education will expand beyond traditional academic subjects and reflect local
and global sustainability issues.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 5
114
Section 2: Guiding Principles
To ensure the integrity and ultimately the feasibility of TRCA’s Strategic Plan, it must be securely
anchored in our organizations’ ethos and guiding philosophy. The mission of TRCA is
To work with our partners to ensure that The Living City is built upon a natural
foundation of healthy rivers and shorelines, greenspace and biodiversity, and
sustainable communities.
Above all, we are dedicated to safeguarding, promoting and enhancing human health and well-being by
ensuring the integrity of the ecological services our environment provides. We will undertake this work
in a cooperative, open, accountable manner, crafting practical and innovative solutions with the
guidance and support of our partners, the community and the residents of the Toronto region. The
following basic principles provide the ethical foundation for the strategic directions, objectives and
actions designed to build The Living City. This is what we believe.
People and nature are part of a single, dynamic and complex ecosystem.
People are part of nature.
The state of health and well-being of the population impacts the health of
Looking after one entails
natural systems, just as the state of our natural environment affects the
taking care of the other.
health of people.
Natural systems provide services that are economically and ecologically
impossible to duplicate. These include: capturing, storing and cleaning the
Natural systems provide water we drink; producing oxygen and cleansing pollutants from the air;
fundamental and
regulating climate; reducing flooding from storms; providing healthy
irreplaceable benefits that recreation opportunities; and offering natural aesthetics that nourish the
are vital to our health and
spirit. Communities are sustained by the successful integration of natural
well-being. systems with human activities. In the context of an urbanizing region we
have a responsibility to create green infrastructure that supports natural
systems.
The challenges that we face in promoting sustainability and building The
Living City are complicated and interrelated. Therefore, solutions must
“Systems thinking” leads to
reflect the complex and inter-connected social, economic and ecological
the most effective
systems that make up The Living City region. TRCA will apply “systems
solutions.
thinking” in developing integrative and adaptive solutions to these
challenges.
All residents deserve TRCA will empower and mobilize a diverse range of stakeholders in
opportunities to help shape
community decision-making processes and collaborative city-building. We
the future of their will promote engagement and strive to ensure that The Living City truly
community.
reflects the needs and contributions of all its citizens.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 6
115
Building on the success of the watershed approach
For almost 60 years, TRCA has managed its mandate on a watershed-by-watershed basis. From flood
management, to safeguarding water quality, to protecting aquatic communities, this made practical,
organizational and ecological sense. Managing on a watershed basis helps ensure the ecological
integrity of this fresh water processing system, while focusing environmental protection and restoration
measures on a local level. Through the watershed-based approach, residents can build deeper
understanding of their impact on their local environment. And when communities are effectively
mobilized, they can exert measurable positive impacts on watershed health.
However, many of the environmental, social and economic challenges we must address in building The
Living City transcend the watershed model. The watershed management approach has taught us that
we mustconfront sustainability challenges at the scale on which they occur. While we cannot allow
political boundaries to limit our actions, neither can we confine programs that promote renewable
energy or mass transit or public education to the boundaries of a particular watershed.
The sustainability challenges of the future will require us to tackle problems at the appropriate scale –
by neighbourhood or community … by local or regional ecosystem … across the Toronto region or the
Golden Horseshoe … by individual watershed or across the entire Great Lakes basin. By choosing the
scale properly and thoughtfully, we will dramatically increase our chances of success.
Our past success with the watershed approach has also taught us that management at the scale of the
problem requires partnership. Because sustainability challenges are rarely confined to the jurisdictional
boundaries of a single agency or government, tackling them requires connecting with stakeholders
across bureaucratic boundaries – geographic and otherwise. TRCA has a proud tradition of making
connections between governments at all levels, community groups, and the private sector, which it will
carry forward in the implementation of this strategic plan.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 7
116
Section 3: What challenges must we address?
Over the past 60 years, as TRCA’s mandate, responsibilities and organizational expertise have
continued to evolve and expand, new environmental, social and economic challenges have arisen:
eutrophication, invasive species, acid rain and the long range transport of air pollutants, hazardous
waste management, PCBs, deterioration of the ozone layer, endocrine disrupting chemicals, global
warming … the list goes on and on. The transformation of the Toronto region into a Living City will
present its own challenges and problems. A selection of the most pressing are presented here.
Urban areas will expand and densities will increase.
Greenfield portions of our jurisdiction are still undergoing development, while existing urban areas are
slated for redevelopment and intensification. While the current pace of development challenges our
capacity to carefully plan for green infrastructure, effective public transit and livable communities, it also
presents significant opportunities to improve the sustainability of our region.
Two million more people
: Provincial plans anticipate that the population of the Greater Toronto
Area (GTA) will grow by approximately two million people over the next 20 years.
New housing and infrastructure required
: This will require the construction of new housing,
institutional and commercial supports, transportation systems, and servicing infrastructure.
Pace of rapid urbanization
: Rapid urbanization will present environmental, social and traffic
congestion challenges, which can impose costs on residents and businesses alike.
Programs and policies to build and grow The Living City, including TRCA land acquisition, must
accommodate and support future growth patterns or risk being displaced by traditional development
approaches and other short-term fixes.
The climate will continue to change.
There is scientific consensus that climate and weather patterns in the Toronto region will undergo
significant change despite current efforts to control and reduce the anthropogenic causes of global
warming. While predictions of the magnitude and timing of these changes are still imprecise, we must
begin to implement policies and plans to both adapt to climate change and respond to the anticipated
economic, social and environmental impacts.
More intense storm events
: We can expect hotter summers, more heat waves, warmer winters,
and more extreme storm events, such as intense thunderstorms that will bring the risk of damaging
high winds and tornados.
Hotter, drier summers:
Researchers are predicting longer precipitation-free periods between
rainfall events, particularly in the summer drought season. We may receive more rain on an annual
basis, but higher temperatures mean that much more of this rain will evaporate instead of
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 8
117
replenishing our lakes, rivers and groundwater. This will contribute to less water flowing into the
Great Lakes basin, reducing overall water levels and posing challenges for navigation,
transportation and recreation.
Serious burden on municipal infrastructure:
The effects of climate change will pose serious risks
to municipal infrastructure and the health of rivers and streams, intensify the urban “heat island”
effect, impact food production and energy use, and cause global economic shifts and migration
pressures.
Collectively, we need to develop a more exact understanding of the local impacts of climate change in
order to draft plans to effectively mitigate those risks, as well as to adapt to future conditions. It will be
our responsibility to lead by example, incorporating consideration of a changing climate into all our
efforts to build The Living City.
Our population is diversifying, aging and growing.
The population in the Toronto region is becoming more diverse, welcoming immigrants from around the
world. At the same time, the population of the region is aging, placing a burden on future generations to
fund and operate the necessary social, medical and economic infrastructure.
Over the next 20 years, immigration will drive population growth
: By 2035, Canada’s
population will reach 44 million, roughly 10 million more than today.
Seniors will represent a much higher proportion of the population:
An aging population will
increase pressure on health care spending and on our retirement income system, while working-
age population growth will slow. This may threaten the quality of available expertise to meet the
challenges ahead.
The plight of young workers
: How do we create jobs and opportunities for under-employed new
graduates that enable them to contribute?
The programs of TRCA must accommodate the needs and aspirations of more diverse and aging
population base, addressing accessibility issues, language barriers, cultural sensitivities and
expectations, and an increased demand for recreational facilities and access to greenspace.
Our economy is susceptible to global competition and uncertainty.
Increasing government debt levels and growing public pressure to limit growth in taxation are making it
more difficult to aggressively fund environmental protection and sustainability initiatives. At the same
time, increasing consumer and household debt may restrict residents’ ability to finance environmentally
preferable options, such as home retrofits or the purchase of green vehicles.
Green technology faces local barriers:
Fluctuating energy pricing has created uncertainty for
investment in renewable energy technologies. Though market penetration of renewable energy
supplies is slow, demand for green technologies, products and services is expected to grow in
Canada and globally.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 9
118
Ontario’s economy is in transition:
Many industries that have provided local jobs are being
moved to developing countries. As Ontario loses well-paid traditional manufacturing jobs, it faces
the challenge of creating the next generation of manufacturing employment by building its economic
capacity through innovation and value-added productivity.
Governments struggle to reconcile economic and environmental concerns
: In our efforts to
remain globally competitive in a changing world, governments are under pressure to limit
environmental regulation and protection in favour of short-term economic gain.
Efforts to build The Living City that ignore the pervasive effects of the global economy or fail to
anticipate and accommodate future shifts and uncertainties will not be effective or achieve their
objectives. The Living City of the future must exist as an innovative and integral component of the
global economy in which it operates.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 10
119
Section 4: Strategic Directions
TRCA has crafted a series of 12 draft strategic directions intended to guide the organizational activities
of the Authority over the 10 year period 2013-2022.
The strategies are presented in two categories: Leadership Strategies, that move us toward The Living
City Vision; and, Enabling Strategies, that build our collective capacity to make significant, positive
impact.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 11
120
LEADERSHIP STRATEGIES
1.Green the Toronto region’s economy
With Ontario’s economy in transition, the time is right to transition the Toronto region to a green
economy. A green economy is fundamentally sustainable and is driven by investments that reduce
carbon emissions and pollution, enhance energy and resource efficiency, and prevent the loss of
biodiversity and ecosystem services. It also recognizes that traditional measures of economic
performance, such as GDP, ignore the contribution of natural assets to wealth, cultural and
community values, and human well-being.
Performance in a green economy may be measured by both the quantity of output and the quality of
that economic activity. Through economic development that supports the creation of a truly green
economy within The Living City, we can improve global competitiveness and attract innovative
people, businesses and investment, while increasing the region’s resilience to global energy
pressures.
Objectives:
1.Improved sustainability performance in traditional economic sectors, such as manufacturing,
retail and health care.
2.A globally competitive green economic sector, including renewable energy, distributed
generation, green buildings and sustainable technologies.
3.The value of the rural landscapes of the Toronto region and how they contribute to prosperity
and community well-being are considered in local decision-making.
Actions:
1.We will develop The Living City Campus as a vibrant green economy innovation cluster (e.g.,
MaRS) in the Toronto region to nurture innovation and develop the green economy. The Living
City Campus will be a premier research, development and learning facility in Ontario for green
building and sustainable technologies and practices.
2.We will collaborate with the province, economic development organizations and businesses to
promote the Toronto region as a global green economy leader to attract green economic
investment and create green jobs.
3.We will establish additional eco-business zones (in accordance with the Partners in Project
Green model) and demonstrate their measurable ecological, social and economic contributions
to regional sustainability.
4.We will expand our training and transitioning programs that prepare workers and job-seekers for
new opportunities in green sectors in order to address the demand for new skills and provide
good quality professional jobs.
5.We will work with stakeholders, including the Greater Toronto Area Agriculture Action
Committee, to identify and implement actions that strengthen the Toronto region’s rural
economy (e.g., agriculture, tourism, cultural landscapes and ecosystem services).
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 12
121
2.Manage our regional water resources for current and future generations
Water has emerged as a leading environmental concern of the 21st century. In the Toronto region
we are blessed with an abundance of fresh water, but we take it for granted. We are among the
most wasteful users of water in the world, and the effects of urban development have severely
impacted our rivers, streams and waterfront. If current trends continue, we risk losing community
access to clean, sustainable drinking water, recreational opportunities and healthy aquatic
ecosystems for generations to come.
Sustainable water management respects water as a life sustaining resource and a powerful force
that shapes our landscape. It recognizes that water problems are complex and cannot be solved
with quick technical solutions alone. A science-based approach integrates social, economic and
environmental concerns to minimize the impacts of development on the natural water cycle.
As a leading city region of the Great Lakes region, the Toronto region has the opportunity to
demonstrate to the world how to develop and retrofit an urban region while sustaining this resource.
Objectives:
1.Improvement of the water quality and aquatic ecosystem health of TRCA rivers and shorelines,
making them more fishable, more hikeable, more canoeable and more swimmable.
2.Minimization or elimination of the impact of new development and urban intensification on water
quality, erosion, flood risk and ecosystems, and improvement of conditions through
redevelopment and community retrofit initiatives.
3.Maximization of the resilience of our water systems in preparation for predicted changes in
climate and ongoing development and land use change.
4.Reduction or elimination of existing flood risks within our jurisdiction.
Actions:
1.We will remove technological and institutional barriers to Low Impact Development (LID)
technology and green infrastructure techniques through research, demonstration, education
and policy.
2.We will undertake ecological restoration based on a coordinated plan that identifies and
prioritizes activities that provide the greatest benefit to river, waterfront and community health.
3.We will enhance state-of-the-art flood forecasting, warning and hazard area identification
systems to protect communities and residents at risk of flooding and to respond to the impacts
of climate change.
4.We will work with the provincial government and municipalities to develop new approaches to
urban stormwater and floodplain management that allow development and redevelopment to
continue while protecting ecosystems and communities. We will enhance our Regional
Watershed Monitoring Network for a deeper understanding of the effects of urbanization on
water resources and to determine how to improve the design of future developments and the
retrofit of infrastructure.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 13
122
5.We will secure the funding and support urgently needed for the long-term operation and
maintenance of our flood control dams and channels and to advance our program of remedial
works to reduce flood risks to communities.
6.We will maintain expertise and tools for policy development and groundwater/surface water
assessments to support the implementation, regular review and update of Source Protection
Plans in TRCA watersheds.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 14
123
3.Rethink greenspace to maximize its value
Urban greenspace in all its forms - from large natural areas and agricultural land to neighbourhood
parks, street trees and green roofs - is vital to healthy and resilient communities. Greenspace can
purify our air and water, support wildlife, provide food, increase our physical and mental health, add
beauty to our communities, and bring people together.
Faced with declining quality of much of the greenspace in the region and increased demands for
this essential resource by a rapidly growing urban population, now is the opportune time to rethink
greenspace as an integrated system. Through thoughtful planning and action we will help develop
a network of greenspace for the Toronto region that maximizes community well-being and
protection of our local ecosystems. This will include helping people become healthier and happier
by promoting appropriate access to existing nature and by creating new green infrastructure in
urban areas. To ensure that future generations also benefit from greenspace, we will also create
awareness of the need to invest in its long-term management and renewal.
Objectives:
1.A network of greenspace and green infrastructure that weaves through every community to
connect a healthy and resilient landscape.
2.More people engaging with nature more often.
3.Improved protection of Toronto region’s natural systems
Actions:
1.We will work with local experts and academic partners to better understand the natural function
of our ecosystems, the services they provide to people, and how we can build a network of
greenspace and green infrastructure that supports ecosystems and people in the long-term.
2.We will work with our partners to acquire, design and distribute greenspace and green
infrastructure, both natural (e.g. ravines, meadows, wetlands) and created (e.g. urban forest,
agriculture and community gardens, green roofs) to all communities in an equitable manner,
directing ecosystem services to the areas where the need is greatest
3.We will partner with municipalities, neighbouring conservation authorities and the federal
government (e.g., Rouge Park) to connect and promote a regional active transportation network
that facilitates physical activity and reduces air pollution while creating key linkages between
natural areas.
4.We will develop infrastructure and tools (e.g., transit access, smart-technology applications) that
improve access to and increase use of greenspace, particularly for marginalized populations
and new Canadians.
5.We will deliver experiences and programs that encourage life-long engagement and
stewardship of urban nature among a more diverse range of people.
6.We will enhance our regional watershed monitoring network so that we can identify new threats
(e.g. invasive species) and regularly evaluate the effectiveness of our efforts to protect,
manage, and restore greenspace.
7.We will work with our partners to identify and protect the significant spaces in our region that are
sensitive and ecologically important that will benefit from careful control of community use.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 15
124
4.Create complete communities that integrate nature and the built environment
Traditional patterns of urbanization in the Toronto region have challenged our capacity to build a
sustainable city region. However, urban intensification and redevelopment provide opportunities to
build stronger, more functional communities.
We will consider the natural and built realms as integrated and focus beyond natural areas to the
strategic location of urban parks and green infrastructure, the integration of the urban forest, and
the creation or retrofit of green buildings.
We can build on our watershed planning experience to assist our partner municipalities, residents
and other stakeholders in planning for and creating communities that are sustainable and meet all
of their residents’ needs.
Objectives:
1.New and redeveloped communities that are compact and livable.
2.New development and redevelopment that achieves a more sustainable balance and integration
of natural and built elements.
3.Improved integration of watershed management and municipal planning under a broader
sustainable community planning approach.
4.Communities designed to support an effective regional transit system.
Actions:
1.We will work with our municipal partners to establish the concept, guidelines and indicators for
Living City Integrated Community Plans. These plans will outline sustainability strategies for
large-scale community development and redevelopment initiatives by integrating traditional
watershed planning and municipal environmental planning concepts with other sustainability
elements, such as energy efficiency, support for walking and public transit, food production and
green infrastructure.
2.We will work with municipalities through all stages of the planning process to design green
urban landscapes that use valuable land wisely, improve quality of life and enhance ecosystem
function. We will develop our in-house expertise in integrating ecological and human needs in
urban design and provide value-added advice to our partner municipalities and the development
community.
3.We will continue to collaborate with the development industry to create innovative and cost-
effective approaches to the implementation of sustainable and Low Impact Development
technologies.
4.We will streamline approvals processes and identify solutions to facilitate leading-edge
sustainable community development projects, including intra-regional transit systems.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 16
125
5.Foster sustainable citizenship
Education and citizen participation are fundamental to the development of The Living City. We must
increase awareness and give people both the tools and the opportunities to make choices that
support sustainable community-building. Involving a broad cross-section of the populationwill
encourage on-going input to sustainable community-building and empower all residents to create a
healthy and sustainable city region.
Objectives:
1.Better understanding of environmental, sustainability and urban issues among more people.
2.More residents engaged more often in activities that help improve their health and well-being,
their communities and their environments.
3.More community members contributing to watershed, community and sustainability planning.
Actions:
1.We will increase the reach and effectiveness of our stewardship programs through better
integration with education programs, by involving stakeholders in program development, and by
incorporating e-learning and other digital technology applications.
2.We will develop new resources to remove financial, transportation and policy barriers to
participation in education programs for elementary, secondary and post-secondary students so
that more students take part in them and pertinent learning outcomes improve.
3.We will work with our partners to provide professional development, training and outreach
programs to improve knowledge and practices related to sustainable technologies and city-
building. We will establish strong connections between these programs and TRCA’s Bridging
Programs for foreign-trained environmental professionals in order to improve learning and
employment opportunities for new Canadians.
4.We will provide, with key partners, after school and summer programs in high impact
neighbourhoods with a focus on leadership, stewardship and watershed and community
revitalization in support of Ontario’s Youth Action Plan.
5.We will establish new approaches that improve civic engagement and participation in decision-
making related to watershed, program, facility and greenspace planning.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 17
126
6.Tell the story of the Toronto region
An appreciation of our cultural heritage gives meaning and context to our path toward the future.
When citizens have a strong ‘sense of place,’ they are more likely to become champions for their
communities and stewards of their environment.
Our city region is characterized by a rich cultural heritage, woven by indigenous Aboriginal peoples,
European settlers and immigrants from all parts of the world. By understanding this heritage,
residents can feel more deeply rooted in their communities and can identify the unique buildings,
features, landscapes, traditions and stories that make their communities special. Gaining
comprehensive knowledge of our history as community builders will also help us to make more
informed and insightful decisions about our natural and cultural resources for the benefit of
generations to come.
Objectives:
1.A stronger sense of place based on the cultural heritage of our region, from Aboriginal nations
to European settlers to new Canadians.
2.Anishinaabe, Haudenosaunee, Huron-Wendat and Métis narratives of community life and their
relationship with the land are integrated into TRCA programs and activities.
3.Greater engagement of the diverse cultural communities that make up the Toronto region in
TRCA programs.
4.Adaptive reuse of our historic buildings and assets that preserves their natural and cultural
heritage value.
Actions:
1.We will build on the success of Black Creek Pioneer Village to present exhibits, events and
educational programs associated with our archaeological sites, collections, heritage objects,
buildings and cultural landscapes.
2.We will continue to engage cultural and ethnic groups to tell the stories of diverse communities
and their contributions to the building of the Toronto region. Through new and existing events
and programs, we will bring these stories to life and help create a sense of belonging for all
residents of the Toronto region.
3.We will grow stronger relationships with new residents of the Toronto region through accessible
language and programs, translation of our communication materials and collaboration with
multi-cultural media organizations.
4.We will establish an Aboriginal advisory committee to draw on indigenous knowledge and
traditions to inform our policies and programs, such as education programs and cultural exhibits.
We will create opportunities for staff to learn the traditional ecological knowledge of Aboriginal
peoples and its relevance to sustainable community-building in our region.
5.We will find uses for our historic buildings and properties, including Bolton Camp, Swan Lake,
Bruce’s Mill and the Black Creek North property, that provide opportunities to preserve and
showcase their cultural heritage characteristics.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 18
127
ENABLING STRATEGIES
7.Build partnerships and new business models
Sustainable city-building cannot be funded by government alone. Nor does any single organization
have the mandate, expertise or capacity to fully realize, on its own, a vision for a sustainable
Toronto region. Partnership and entrepreneurship are essential, as resources are scarce,
complexity is great, and a capacity to undertake a diverse range of programs is needed.
To be successful, we must work collaboratively with our partners, both new and existing, toward a
shared vision for The Living City. By building and diversifying our partnerships, exploring new
business models and improving efficiency, we can enhance our regional capacity to reach
sustainability goals, include more organizations in sustainable community-building, and build
TRCA’s own resilience in the face of inevitable and unpredictable changes.
Objectives:
1.More diverse and stronger partnerships to create opportunities, remove funding barriers and
support new directions established in The Living City Strategic Plan.
2.Maximum impact from use of funds and resources through efficiencies and partnerships.
3.Increased financial resilience for TRCA through stable and diversified funding.
Actions:
1.We will pursue creative multi-partner collaborations that include the private sector, non-
governmental organizations and government agencies (e.g., the Trees for Life coalition,
Archetype Sustainable House build) to expand our capacity.
2.We will broaden the scope of the existing Continuous Sustainable Improvement (CSI) review
process to maximize organizational value to our partners, funders and the community-at-large.
3.In partnership with The Living City Foundation, we will leverage our experience as a service
delivery provider to extend our reach and support the development of sustainable communities
at a provincial and national level.
4.We will establish a capital fund to support the financial development of self-sustaining social
entrepreneurship ventures.
5.We will pilot social financing projects (e.g., community bonds, crowd-funding).
6.In collaboration with third party providers, we will make use of park and education facilities, staff
and programs to provide better value to the community and generate incremental revenue.
7.Where appropriate, we will work with our municipal, provincial and federal partners to assign the
management of public lands in order to make more efficient and effective use of our combined
resources.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 19
128
8.Gather and share the best urban sustainability knowledge
Understanding the complex systems at work in a city region improves our ability to address issues
related to sustainability and city-building. Currently, development in the Toronto region is outpacing
our ability to adapt and respond to the implications of past planning decisions, as well as to
effectively integrate new and emerging knowledge into the practice of sustainable city-building.
TRCA is uniquely positioned to address these challenges by taking a leadership role in acquiring
and sharing knowledge related to urban sustainability. We will also identify innovative technologies,
evaluate their effectiveness and facilitate their implementation.
Objectives:
1.Deeper understanding of the complex climate, ecological, social and economic systems within
our city region and how to respond to them.
2.Improved and timely access for the Toronto region planning community and development
industry to relevant leading-edge sustainable city-building knowledge.
3.Optimal use and application of the data we collect.
4.Improved application of leading-edge sustainability city-building knowledge to the planning,
design and retrofit of urban communities.
Actions:
1.We will continue to develop The Living City Campus at Kortright as a regional centre of
expertise for sustainable city-building. Expanding on the current technology focus at the
Campus, we will work with academic institutions and public and private sector experts to create
a leading-edge research and learning centre for the planning, design and governance of
sustainable communities.
2.We will share leading-edge research on urban sustainability with our municipal partners, the
development industry and private business. We will work with our partners to accelerate
monitoring and reporting of outcomes to improve future planning decisions.
3.We will create new ways to coordinate the engagement of academics, researchers, the building
industry and municipal experts to more effectively infuse new science, an understanding of
complex systems, innovation and on-the-ground experience into urban planning, design and
governance in the Toronto region.
4.We will continue to utilize our regional watershed and waterfront monitoring program to inform
watershed and management plans and activities.
5.We will make pertinent TRCA data more readily available for internal staff and create
opportunities to openly share data for public use.
6.We will continue to work with academic partners, the insurance industry and governments to
facilitate regionally-specific climate research and data analyses that will enable effective policy
and investment responses to climate change and extreme weather risk.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 20
129
9.Measure performance
Achieving The Living City vision relies on our ability to measure our performance – accurately and
on a consistent basis – in order to adjust policies and priorities, fine-tune programs and reallocate
resources as necessary. Building on the success of The Living City Report Card, issued in 2011,
we will use advanced measurement and reporting tools to inform current and future sustainability
decision-making that improves not only the built and natural environments, but human and social
outcomes as well.
Our internal measurement and reporting systems will allow for greater accountability and
transparency to our funders, partners and stakeholders while strengthening our ability to build and
adapt our work plans.
In collaboration with our partners, we will report on a wide range of city-building indicators, while
tracking genuine progress towards the creation of The Living City.
Objectives:
1.Measures that indicate genuine progress related to natural, built, social and human objectives
and outcomes.
2.Accurate measurement of the efficiency and effectiveness of objectives and outcomes of TRCA
programs.
3.Measures that demonstrate alignment of objectives and outcomes with those of our partners.
Actions:
1.We will continue to work with CivicAction, building on The Living City Report Card, in order to
track and report on regional sustainability progress.
2.We will formalize a framework of measurable objectives and targets for TRCA that cuts across
divisions and staff teams, and aligns directly with the Strategic Plan.
3.We will leverage the knowledge and expertise of regional partners in the development of
regional performance measures that align reporting activities.
4.We will report on social and human health outcome indicators that measure the impact of TRCA
programs and activities on people.
5.We will implement an open data system for tracking and sharing indicators of performance in
The Living City.
6.We will strengthen employee development and succession planning to integrate employee
performance measurement with the objectives of the Strategic Plan.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 21
130
10.Accelerate innovation
Innovation starts with the recognition that there is always a better way to achieve goals. Innovators
have the ability to reframe problems, explore alternative approaches, make good decisions by
weighing potential risks and rewards, and champion new solutions.
In a complex environment where natural systems, the economy and technologies are rapidly
changing, responding to change has never been more challenging. Management approaches must
now evolve to address increasingly complex systems. In order to meet its goals for The Living City,
TRCA is committed to continuous innovation, with an emphasis on removing road blocks and
embracing good ideas, new approaches, knowledge and technology to solve our region’s social,
economic and environmental problems in a dynamic world.
Objectives:
1.The Toronto region is a global leader in innovation related to sustainability.
2.More innovative approaches implemented by TRCA to achieve The Living City vision.
3.Stronger culture of innovation within TRCA to stimulate forward thinking and idea generation.
Actions:
1.We will develop structures, processes and criteria that support innovation organization-wide by
providing sufficient time and space to investigate, evaluate and implement innovative solutions.
2.We will give staff access to networked digital technologies that support innovation.
3.We will improve TRCA staff connections with the outside world, through market research, social
media, conferences and partnerships, to keep up-to-date with emerging trends, programs and
relevant organizations.
4.We will create a Centre for Innovation in Conservation at Swan Lake. The Centre will be a place
for collaboration among regional organizations and individuals with a shared interest in
conservation and innovation.
5.We will establish a special capital fund to support innovation.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 22
131
11.Invest in our staff
TRCA’s efforts toward creating The Living City rely on the strengths of our staff and our volunteers.
At work or in the community, every person at TRCA is an ambassador for The Living City vision and
an integral part of our capacity to succeed in an increasingly challenging and demanding
environment.
As an organization, we are committed to being a global and national leader in demonstrating
excellence as an employer and a community builder. Our efforts will be focused on supporting our
diverse staff as they balance a high level of workplace performance with fulfilling home and
community lives. This will be accomplished by providing professional training and development
programs, facilitating leadership and volunteer opportunities, and empowering staff to become
contributing members of The Living City.
Objectives:
1.TRCA is an organization that values, encourages and acts on good ideas.
2.Every employee has the information and tools needed to do their job well.
3.Every employee attains a healthy work/life balance.
Actions:
1.We will create cross-divisional teams to strengthen staff relations, encourage information
exchange and generate new ideas.
2.We will increase opportunities for communication between the TRCA Board, management and
front-line staff to allow all staff to contribute to TRCA’s direction and operational effectiveness.
3.We will acknowledge and celebrate the contributions of staff, recognizing noteworthy cross-
divisional successes and personal accomplishments.
4.We will establish a network of healthy and inspiring offices and work environments that
encourage effective employee performance and enable flexible work arrangements.
5.We will formalize each staff member’s professional development and job-training through their
employee development plans.
6.We will manage workload, productivity and expectations to help staff achieve a healthy work/life
balance.
7.We will strengthen our health and safety programs to emphasize the importance of mental and
physical wellness.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 23
132
12.Facilitate a region-wide approach to sustainability
Municipalities, institutions and businesses across the Toronto region are laying the foundation
needed to create a sustainable future. However, current efforts are limited by a lack of integration.
To maintain momentum and ensure the effectiveness of ongoing programs and approaches,
greater coordination is required among all stakeholders. Regional sustainability requires that we
understand and balance the local and global connections between the natural environment, the built
environment, the economy, and human health and well-being. TRCA’s regional perspective and on-
going collaboration with public, private and non-profit sectors, enables us to coordinate these efforts
for the benefit of all.
Objectives:
1.Alignment of sustainable community-building programs among stakeholders within the Toronto
region.
2.Integration of TRCA programs with a regional sustainability approach.
3.Acceleration of development, redevelopment or retrofit of communities that put The Living City
sustainability priorities into action.
Actions:
1.We will bring partners together to develop a common vision and strategy for sustainability in the
Toronto region – The Living City Regional Sustainability Plan. We will initiate the strategic
alliance of municipalities, private industry, institutions, provincial and federal governments and
their agencies, community groups and non-governmental organizations that will develop this
plan. TRCA will facilitate the development of the plan, connect to world-leading expertise, and
provide watershed and ecosystem management perspectives.
2.We will facilitate complete planning for at least one new community development or
redevelopment that incorporates best practices in all aspects of sustainable design, as well as
regional sustainability goals, with a view to completing construction within 10 years. TRCA will
bring together municipalities, developers and other private industry, landowners and provincial
government agencies to achieve this new community.
3.We will expand the scope of our community and market transformation programs (e.g.,
Sustainable Neighbourhood Retrofit Action Plans, Partners in Project Green, Living City
Campus programs, Professional Access Integration Enhancement) to advance a broader suite
of ecological, social, cultural and economic objectives that define The Living City vision.
4.We will report on progress toward regional sustainability in future versions of The Living City
Report Card, and work with other reporting initiatives (e.g., Toronto Vital Signs) to include
indicators associated with The Living City Regional Sustainability Plan. We will work with
municipalities, businesses and civic organizations (e.g., CivicAction) to develop a regional
framework of sustainability indicators to track our progress.
5.We will advocate for the incorporation of watershed management into a broader framework for
sustainable community development and land use planning by participating in a new provincial
dialogue on integrated watershed management, as proposed by Conservation Ontario.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 24
133
Section 5: Putting the Plan into action
This document marks the beginning of a strategy development process for TRCA. We commit to
implementing the strategies and actions of this plan by ensuring that our staff considers them in
everything they do. At TRCA, the 2013 strategic plan will be the basis for our decisions, from budgeting
and business planning to program development and employee management. In the coming years, we
will continually measure and track our progress on each strategy, we will regularly review our trajectory
and we will make course corrections when required. Much like the development of this strategic plan, a
team of staff from across the organization will be responsible for monitoring our progress and ensuring
that we are fulfilling our commitments. In this way, we will ensure we coordinate our actions and draw
on the expertise that each group and division at TRCA has to offer.
As it has in the past, TRCA will put these new strategic priorities into action through partnership. We
will continue to provide our perspective on sustainability to the plans and strategies of our municipal
partners, and we will collaborate with them to find the most efficient ways to advance a shared vision
for a sustainable region. We will continue to advocate for provincial and federal participation in
sustainable city building by demonstrating the benefits of investment to the health and well-being of our
communities and to our region’s economy. We will continue to build innovative partnerships with the
private sector that provide improved economic performance with social and environmental impact.
Last, but certainly not least, we will continue to work on the ground with communities to translate their
enthusiasm and energy into a lifelong commitment to building a sustainable Living City.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 25
134
Section 6: This Plan builds on TRCA’s legacy
TRCA is well positioned and uniquely qualified to plan, promote and coordinate the building of The
Living City over the next 10 years and through the subsequent decades. We are building on our
expertise in watershed management and land conservation, and moving beyond those traditional
mandates, to achieve a broad, ambitious, positive vision for the Toronto region.
Where we are headed is based on where we came from and what we have done. The story of TRCA
has been one of continuous evolution and adaptation in response to changes in science, community
demands, and public policy. The short history set out below illustrates how TRCA has evolved to
become the inclusive, collaborative, regionally-oriented organization it is today.
Ontario passes the Conservation Authorities Act permitting municipalities to establish
1946 Conservation Authorities – on a watershed basis – to manage their renewable natural
resources without restrictions imposed by their own political boundaries.
Following the devastation of Hurricane Hazel, four smaller Conservation Authorities are
1954 amalgamated to form Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (MTRCA)
to manage flood control more effectively across the region.
Lands are acquired to protect environmentally significant natural heritage areas, to
rehabilitate of degraded areas, and to provide relief from flood and erosion hazards.
1957 Since 1957, we have acquired more than 17,375 hectares (42,934 acres) of land in the
watersheds of the Toronto region, The majority of the Toronto region's extensive park
and open space system is situated on Authority lands.
MTRCA’sPlan for Flood Control and Water Conservation calls for the construction of
1959 multi-purpose dams and reservoirs, engineered river channels, the acquisition of flood
plain lands, and the creation of a flood warning system.
th
Black Creek Pioneer Village opens. The village recreates community life in mid-19
Century Ontario and reflects TRCA’s on-going commitment to preserving cultural
1960
heritage and building appreciation for the Toronto region’s agricultural, social and
commercial past.
MTRCA opens the Albion Hills Conservation Field Centre, our first residential education
1963 centre to provide conservation and outdoor education programs to students from the
Toronto region.
TheWaterfront Plan for the Metropolitan Toronto Planning Area introduces the new
“integrated shoreline management” concept to limit shoreline erosion while creating a
1967
number of large parkland areas and public marinas connected by a waterfront trail
system. The Plan launches a new era of public consultation.
TheWatershed Plan marks a shift from the structural engineering approach of the 1960s
1980 and 1970s in favour of an ecological approach to watershed management. Water quality
and healthy aquatic life take on new importance.
Starting in the late 1970s, MTRCA undertakes a series of biological inventories leading
1982
to the identification of 126 environmentally significant areas in the Toronto region.
TheGreenspace Strategy asserts that natural lands play a vital role in flood and erosion
control, groundwater recharge, and human health and well-being. It describes MTRCA’s
1989
ongoing work in land acquisition, archaeology, education, land use and waterfront
planning, and recreation.
The Don Watershed Task Force is created, bringing together residents, local groups,
municipalities and government agencies to develop an ecosystem regeneration plan for
1992 the watershed. This begins a new era of community participation that continues to this
day in such projects as river clean-ups, tree plantings, trail development and
management plans.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 26
135
TheValley and Stream Corridor Management Program is published to serve as TRCA’s
planning and regulatory policies. Aspects of the VSCMP are subsequently incorporated
into the official plans of many of our member municipalities. It is the foundation of the our
1994
greenspace system, with the natural land and aquatic systems seen as the “green and
blue” infrastructure of the Toronto region, vital in reducing flooding and erosion, filtering
water and capturing air pollutants.
MTRCA becomes Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) following the
1998
amalgamation of the City of Toronto.
TRCA initiates The Living City Strategic Plan with the goal of engaging agencies,
1999 industries and communities in collaborating for the sustainability of all life within TRCA’s
nine river watersheds and Lake Ontario waterfront.
Federal and provincial governments designate the Humber River a Canadian Heritage
1999 River bringing more emphasis to the protection, restoration and celebration of the river’s
history and heritage.
Ontario passes the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Plan, followed by the
Greenbelt Act and Plan (2005), the Places to Grow Act (2005), the Clean Water Act
(2006) and the Green Energy Act (2009). Together with the Growth Plan for the Greater
Golden Horseshoe (2006) and the Provincial Policy Statement (2005), these initiatives
2001
begin to move society towards a “culture of conservation” and mark a renewed emphasis
on renewable sources of energy, adaptation to climate change, sustainable growth
through urban intensification, public transit, and water, waste, energy and cultural
heritage conservation. Many of these themes are reflected in TRCA’s recent programs.
TRCA initiates the Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program (STEP) to provide the
data and analytical tools necessary to support broader implementation of sustainable
2005 technologies and practices within a Canadian context. STEP monitors and evaluates
clean water, air and energy technologies, and assesses barriers and opportunities to
implementing those technologies.
TheTerrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy is used to identify the natural heritage
system and to set targets for increasing natural cover within TRCA’s jurisdiction in order
2007
to maintain biodiversity, reduce flooding and erosion, and ensure the integrity of the
ecological services the environment provides.
TRCA is awarded the bid to host the World Green Building Council Secretariat. Through
partnerships established with the Canada Green Building Council and the World Green
2007
Building Council, TRCA helps to connect and empower industry leaders to effect the
transformation of the local building industry toward sustainability.
TRCA and Greening Greater Toronto (an initiative of CivicAction) issues The Living City
Report Card, an on-going effort to track and assess trends to reduce the carbon footprint
2011
of the GTA, improve air and water quality, protect and expand greenspace, safeguard
biodiversity, and reduce waste.
The Living City Policies are approved for municipal, public and stakeholder consultation.
These policies will guide the implementation of TRCA’s legislated and delegated roles
2012
and responsibilities in the planning and development approvals process over the next
ten years.
The cumulative impact of each of these evolutionary developments has led to the TRCA of today. The
qualitiesthat carried TRCA through these developments – open-mindedness, the thirst for
understanding, accountability, adaptability, responsiveness and commitment to community – have
characterized TRCA from the beginning, characterize us today, and will continue to shape our
contributions to the future of our region.
TRCA Strategic Plan 2013 – April 17,2013 27
136
RES.#A56/13 -PARKS CANADA
Interim Management Agreement. Entering into an interim managemen
agreement with Parks Canada relating to the management of Toront
and Region Conservation Authority lands in the proposed Rouge
National Urban Park.
Moved by:Jack Heath
Seconded by:Michael Di Biase
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into
management agreement with Parks Canada for the management of TRC
proposed Rouge National Urban Park;
AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to ta
may be required to implement the licence agreement, including th
necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documen
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #2/12, held on March 30, 2012, Resolution #A22/12 was approved as
follows:
THAT the "Statement of Intent -Towards Cooperation and Collabora
Establishment of a National Urban Park in the Rouge Valley" be endorsed;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)request direction from the
Ministry of Infrastructure regarding the disposition of provinci
in title or by management agreement for Rouge Park purposes;
THAT TRCA express its thanks to Minister Peter Kent for the supp
;
of Canada to create the National Urban Park
THAT TRCA express its thanks to Mr. Alan Wells, Chair of the Rouge Park Alliance for his
leadership in pursuit of the resolution of the governance and fu
;
Rouge Park
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA continue to offer its assistance to Parks C
the transition period and provision of other services to Parks C
Urban Park is established.
The Province of Ontario terminated the Memorandum of Understandi
Ministry of Natural Resources, Rouge Park Alliance and TRCA effe
MOU related to the Rouge Park Alliance and operations, administr
Rouge Park. On July 23, 2012 TRCA received a letter from Parks
Canada's intention to have TRCA be responsible for the interim m
until it is formerly established as Rouge National Urban Park an
operational control. TRCA staff has been working with Parks Can
agreement relating to the interim management.
137
Terms and Conditions of the Interim Management Agreement
TRCA will manage the existing Rouge Park in a manner that is con
and mandated responsibilities of Parks Canada and will consider
Parks CanadaÔs mandate of protection, education and visitor expe
making process;
Parks Canada will provide TRCA with funding to cover the salarie
associated with the existing Rouge Park staff;
Parks Canada may, upon receipt of a request from TRCA, provide a
to capital improvements including natural heritage restoration p
on and/or demolition of existing structures located on the TRCA
all revenues generated from TRCA lands in the Rouge Park will be
operate the Rouge Park;
TRCA will not enter into any new leases or rentals, change the u
develop a previously undeveloped parcel of land, sell, grant an
undertake capital improvements and/or demolish a structure witho
of Parks Canada;
this MOU may be terminated at any time upon the giving of three
FINANCIAL DETAILS
As noted above, Parks Canada will provide funding to cover the co
Rouge Park staff. Parks Canada has also agreed to consider fund
TRCA-owned structures with the Rouge Park. With respect to the
generated from the Rouge Park for management and operation of th
with the provincial requirement in the agreement for the transfe
the Bob Hunter Memorial Park lands from the Province to TRCA.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Emails: mfenning@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223; Mike Bend
Emails: mfenning@trca.on.ca or mbender@trca.on.ca
Date: April 10, 2013
___________________________________
RES.#A57/13 -RECREATIONAL FISHERIES PLAN
Greater Toronto and Area Waterfront. Development of a recreation
fisheries plan for the Greater Toronto and Area Waterfront.
Moved by:Jim Tovey
Seconded by:Paul Ainslie
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) develop a
plan for the Greater Toronto and Area Lake Ontario Waterfront in
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), Credit Valley Conse
Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA);
138
THAT staff be directed to coordinate a Project Team, which would
CVA and CLOCA staff, interested government and organizations, co
community residents to assist with the development of the Greate
Waterfront: Urban Recreational Fisheries Plan and to facilitate
input;
AND FURTHER THAT the final Greater Toronto and Area Waterfront:
Fisheries Plan be brought to the Authority for approval.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Fish are a known indicator of environmental health; if the physi
declines, the diversity and productivity of fish populations als
protecting and managing fisheries and other aquatic resources ha
organizations at the local, regional and provincial levels.
MNR, CVC, CLOCA and TRCA have initiated the preparation of a rec
along the Lake Ontario waterfront from the western border of the
to the eastern border of Durham Region. The plan will integrate
and analyses conducted on the Lake Ontario waterfront. The plan
of various groups and recommend actions to resolve key issues ra
actions will focus on improving recreational fishing opportuniti
improving access to the fishing resource and promoting fisheries
The variety of interests in urban fishing has existed for decade
commitment from partners is fundamental to the development of th
The nearshore Lake Ontario water quality has improved and contin
the reduced nutrients levels, improved water clarity and capital
of Toronto and the region. Recreational fishing has always taken
small areas and targeting limited fish species. With the improve
can now promote the diversity of fish locations and the wide var
along the Greater Toronto Area waterfront. The idea to develop a
Toronto came from an Aquatic Habitat Toronto meeting and it was
concept of the recreational fisheries plan could be applied to t
Ontario. TRCA approached CLOCA and CVC with the idea and they re
of the plan and formed a partnership with TRCA.
The following organizations have been invited to participate in
fisheries plan for the Lake Ontario waterfront:
Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport
City of Pickering, Culture & Recreation
City of Toronto, Parks, Forestry & Recreation
Credit Valley Conservation
Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority
Environment Canada, including Canadian Wildlife Service
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Conservation Halton
Ministry of the Environment
Ministry of Natural Resources, Fisheries Policy Section
139
Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters
Toronto Port Authority
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Toronto Remedial Action Plan
Town of Ajax, Culture & Recreation
Waterfront Toronto
City of Mississauga, Recreation & Parks
Town of Oakville, Recreation & Culture
Town of Whitby, Parks and Recreation
City of Burlington, Parks and Recreation
RATIONALE
This plan will be of great benefit to many agencies with interes
waterfront. In essence, this plan will identify aquatic habitats
fisheries that are sensitive and may need additional protection
considerations), and where aquatic habitat can be improved. The
guidance for managing the fisheries resource to optimize angling
manner, it will also encourage safe urban angling practices such
other users and respecting habitat and private property.
Specifically, the plan is a critical and important conservation
and sustainability of Lake Ontario fisheries.
The planÔs mission is to:
1.Build upon existing knowledge of the plan area.
2.Integrate complementary information from adjacent regions.
3.Identify strengths, weaknesses and opportunities associated wi
fisheries.
4.Recommend strategies for improving public access and establish
among municipalities to enhance and maintain that public access.
5.Recommend strategies to promote the recreational fishery by me
marketing, signage, family fishing events, programming (camps, e
synergies between key stakeholders.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding will be received from the following sources and will cov
Great Lakes Sustainability Fund (proposed cash funding) $50,000.
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (in-kind support) $40,
Toronto Remedial Action Plan (received partial cash funding, add
proposed) $5,000 and $15,000, respectively.
Ministry of Natural Resources (in-kind support) $15,000.
Aquatic Habitat Toronto (cash and in-kind support) $5,000 and $5,
Durham Capital Fund (cash) $10,000.
Report prepared by: Emily Morton, extension 5628
Emails: emorton@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Emily Morton, extension 5628
Emails: emorton@trca.on.ca
Date: March 18, 2013
140
RES.#A58/13 -DUFFINS MARSH RESTORATION
Approval to enter
Ontario Power Generation Pickering Nuclear Station.
into a Memorandum of Understanding with Ontario Power Generation
Pickering Nuclear Station to restore the southwest lagoon of the
Marsh Complex.
Moved by:Jim Tovey
Seconded by:Paul Ainslie
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into
Understanding and funding agreement with Ontario Power Generatio
Station to restore the southwest lagoon of the Duffins Marsh Com
exceed $500,000, starting in 2014;
THAT staff report to the Authority the details of the project an
THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever
to implement the agreement, including the obtaining of necessary
signing and executions of any documents;
AND FURTHER THAT Ontario Power Generation Pickering Nuclear Stat
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 2000, TRCA completed the Duffins Marsh Restoration Action Pla
with the assistance of the Town of Ajax, City of Pickering, prov
well as, the general public and a number of environmental non-go
The Action Plan focused on: forest restoration; fish and wildlif
and trail and interpretive infrastructure. Over the past 13 year
aspects of the original plan have been completed or partially im
of this restoration effort, TRCA has benefited from the financia
Generation - Pickering Nuclear Station (OPGPNS). The most succes
component of the plan is the design and implementation of the we
the Action Plan.
Corner Marsh is the largest lagoon (17 hectares) within the Duff
the location of TRCA's major restoration effort. This lagoon has
and Duffins Creek, temporarily dewatered and allowed to regenera
plant community has been restored to the extent found in the mid
additional emergent vegetation); submergent aquatic plants now a
open water zone (5% coverage before restoration); and the site i
and wildlife.
141
Corner Marsh now has multiple broods of waterfowl including wood
winged teals. The marsh is a significant migratory stopover loca
for fish-eating birds like Caspian terns, great blue herons, bel
year, three least bittern nests were located in the marsh. This
Species At Risk (SAR) in Ontario and its presence, nesting and p
significant and speaks to the health and integrity of this newly
Corner Marsh was surveyed and found to have the largest populati
northwest shoreline of Lake Ontario. Muskrats are a sentinel spe
in the International Joint Commission (IJC) study on Lake Ontari
population of muskrats has in turn attracted a family of river o
Based on the outstanding success of Corner Marsh, staff has deta
restoration plans for the remaining three lagoons within the Duf
concept plan in Attachment 1). Staff has been actively soliciti
implementation of this restoration plan. The OPGPNS has been dir
Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) to restore three hectares of we
operations and recently TRCA staff secured support for further w
Duffins Marsh Complex.
The OPGPNS has a history of fish impingement and entrainment, an
CNSC as a licensing condition to mitigate the impacts on the fis
OPGPNS has developed, deployed and monitored the efficiency of a
barrier net that has substantially decreased the loss of fish to
weather and ice conditions on Lake Ontario, the net cannot be de
months. Through analysis and negotiations with the regulatory ag
the concept of constructing habitat as an ecological offset for
TRCA's initial success with Corner Marsh, OPGPNS has agreed to s
restoration of an additional lagoon within the Duffins Marsh Com
for the Duffins Marsh Restoration Action Plan is a great example
biodiversity, protection of the local environment and being an e
industry.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
To implement this project, staff will develop a Memorandum of Un
Agreement with OPGPNS including provision for detailed planning,
funding, monitoring, maintenance and operational requirements. R
obtained. Construction is scheduled for the fall/winter 2014/20
FINANCIAL DETAILS
OPGPNS has agreed to provide $500,000 over a three year period f
southwestern lagoon (Phase 1) in the Duffins Marsh Complex. Deta
include design, build, monitoring, operational requirements and
Report prepared by: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246
Emails: gmacpherson@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246
Emails: gmacpherson@trca.on.ca
Date: March 28, 2013
Attachments:1
142
Attachment 1
___________________________________
143
RES.#A59/13 -EURASIAN MILFOIL AT FRENCHMAN'S BAY
Approval of biological control measures to control Eurasian Milfo
Frenchman's Bay.
Moved by:Jim Tovey
Seconded by:Paul Ainslie
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) support th
control measures to control Eurasian water-milfoil within French
THAT TRCA staff be directed to continue to support the work of t
Eurasian Water-Milfoil Control Steering Committee and provide th
support of $1,500.00 for 2013;
THAT staff report back to the Authority on the progress of the b
Eurasian Water-Milfoil and the work of the FrenchmanÔs Bay Euras
Control Steering Committee;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Pickering be advised.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has been monitoring th
Bay for a number of years, including the growth of aquatic veget
FrenchmanÔs Bay has exhibited a substantial loss of emergent wet
suppressed submergent plant community. Submergent plants were hi
water quality conditions, including high primary productivity (a
clarity (high turbidity) and overall changes in water quality. S
been progressively re-colonized with submerged aquatic plants. I
summer droughts, static weather conditions and low water levels
conditions favourable to the complete re-colonization of aquatic
submerged plant community is now back to conditions not seen sin
there are several aquatic plants present that are providing exce
However, concern has grown over a potential problem: certain are
colonized with the invasive Eurasian water-milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum).
Since August 2012, TRCA staff has monitored the monthly progress
plants in FrenchmanÔs Bay. The submerged aquatic plant densities
unit to determine the extent of very dense, dense, moderate and
Very dense vegetation was classified as areas that totally imped
vegetation were problematic for boat traffic, but were still pas
vegetation did not impede navigation. In addition, seven permane
where plant species were identified and overall plant community
(percent composition of species present). In total, nine species
are found within FrenchmanÔs Bay including: coontail, Eurasian m
common waterweed, slender pondweed, lesser duckweed, greater duc
Eurasian frogbit. In some sample locations, Eurasian water-milfo
of the overall plant community. Attachment 1 is the Frenchman's Bay aquatic plant survey from
October, that depicts the maximum extent of aquatic plants encou
144
Eurasian water-milfoil is an invasive aquatic plant native to EuAsia and northern Africa.
th
Introduced to North America in the 19 Century, it is now one of the most widely distributed
invasive aquatic plants on the continent. It may have been intro
trade, on recreational boats and trailers, or in the ballast wat
prefers shallow water one to three metres deep, but can root in A
fast-growing perennial, it forms dense underwater mats that shad
form surficial mats that restrict boating and overall the recrea
of Eurasian water-milfoil can pose a threat to public safety and
economic impact, affecting property values around the bay, touri
RATIONALE
During the fall of 2012, the following organizations and busines
FrenchmanÔs Bay Eurasian Water-Milfoil Control Steering Committe
Pickering East Shore Community Association (PESCA)
West Shore Community Association (WSCA)
FrenchmanÔs Bay Yacht Club
Pickering Harbour Company
Pickering Auxiliary Rescue Association (PARU)
SwanÔs Marina
DSCC No. 185 (Dockominium)
Pickering Dragon Boat Club
Pickering Rouge Canoe Club
TRCA and City of Pickering were also invited to attend as stakeh
TRCA staff has repeatedly detailed the ecological and beneficial
aquatic plant re-colonization of the bay. Staff has also assiste
understand the rationale for selective management of aquatic pla
A number of the Eurasian Water-Milfoil Control Steering Committee members have spent a
significant amount of time researching Eurasian water-milfoil an
and control mechanisms. The committee reviewed the success of th
contacted a number of contractors, municipalities and other orga
with Eurasian milfoil and submerged aquatic plant control. Some
considered include:
biological control (weevils);
dredging;
herbicide;
mechanical harvesting;
other control techniques.
The consensus of the committee is the development and implementa
management plan to control Eurasian water-milfoil. The first tec
implementation is the strategic deployment of biological control
high density areas of Eurasian water-milfoil. The dredging of na
and connecting channels will deepen and widen these areas to pre
problematic aquatic vegetation and assist in navigation. Application of herbicides will be
reviewed and potentially considered if dredging and the biologic
145
The milfoil weevil (Euhrychiopsis lecontei) is a marine insect that is native to North America and
specifically feeds on water-milfoil. The weevil, which is fully
submersed on plants, producing three to four generations over th
destroys the water-milfoil plant by ÓminingÔ into the stem and e
disrupting the plantÔs ability to grow in the summer and survive
loses its buoyancy and will sink to the bottom of the water as i
desirable aquatic plants to re-establish. Milfoil weevils are na
no known negative impacts on people, animals, fish or other vege
To reduce the impacts of Eurasian water-milfoil on the recreatio
dredging is being considered as an aid to navigation. FrenchmanÔ
proposing to dredge the area around their docks and a channel to
the spring of 2013. Other marine interests within the bay have e
and TRCA staff will assist with the agencies interested in dredg
committed to the City of Pickering to cooperatively review and a
within the bay.
Comprehensive herbicide treatment will not be initiated in 2013Any herbicide application will
be limited to dock areas and confined navigational areas and wil
regulatory approvals of the Ministry of the Environment for each
members are also looking for additional control measures that ar
jurisdictions.
The Eurasian Water-Milfoil Control Steering Committee has agreed
control of Eurasian milfoil in 2013. Milfoil Solution Inc. will
stocking the bay with milfoil weevils, starting with 40,000 in the first year, and 35,000 and
10,000 in the following two years.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The Eurasian Water-Milfoil Control Steering Committee has obtain
using weevils. The total estimated cost of treatment is $169,521
costs, they are proposing a four-year funding contribution plan
City of Pickering for approximately 35% of the cost. The balance
through funds provided by the other stakeholders and fundraising
the City of Pickering is $30,000 for year 1, $20,000 for year 2,
year 4, for a total of $60,750. The amount requested from the TR
for year 2, $500 for year 3, and $150 for year 4, for a total of
any other treatments would be borne solely by the boat clubs and
2013 request are found in account 109-15 in the Durham capital b
Report prepared by: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246
Emails: gmacpherson@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246
Emails: gmacpherson@trca.on.ca
Date: March 28, 2013
Attachment: 1
146
Attachment 1
___________________________________
147
RES.#A60/13 -SWAN LAKE RESIDENCE RENOVATION AND RETROFIT PROJECT
Renovations and retrofit of the Swan Lake residence and entering
agreement with the York Region District School Board and YMCA of
Greater Toronto for the use of a portion of the building for the
Outdoor Education Centre.
Moved by:Jim Tovey
Seconded by:Paul Ainslie
WHEREAS outdoor education has been an important component of Tor
Conservation Authority's (TRCA) work in conservation;
AND WHEREAS TRCA requires additional office accommodations for s
AND WHEREAS TRCA's Draft 2013 Strategic Plan identifies the crea
Innovation in Conservation at Swan Lake for the purposes of purs
innovative approaches to conservation:
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT staff be directed to proceed w
and retrofit of the Swan Lake residence;
THAT TRCA enter into a licence agreement with the York Region Di
and the YMCA of Greater Toronto for the shared use of the Swan L
Centre for a ten year period with an option for a 10 year renewa
concurrence of TRCA to the renewal;
AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to ta
may be required to implement the licence agreement, including th
necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documen
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
On July 31, 2008, TRCA acquired 1229 Bethesda Road (Swan Lake) f
Hollander. The property consists of a 20.45 hectares (50.54 acr
of land which includes a two storey, 6,000 square foot, stone ex
residence, triple detached garage and a nine acre kettle lake, s
Concession 2, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of Yo
With its close proximity to the Lake St. George Field Centre (LS
SNAP (Sustainable Neighbourhood Retrofit Action Plan), and being
Ridges Moraine, there are a range of potential uses for the prop
programming and operational needs, including outdoor education,
meeting space. TRCA has engaged the services of MC Architects f
structural, electrical and mechanical engineering services requi
Swan Lake residence to re-purpose this building from its histori
meets the current and future needs of TRCA and our partners.
148
RATIONALE
Outdoor education has been an important component of TRCA's work
inception and the ongoing commitment of our school board partner
benefit from a wide range of outdoor experiences has affirmed th
population and student enrollment in York Region has necessitate
Region District School Board's (YRDSB) outdoor education program and provided an
opportunity to bring a number of stakeholders together to establ
developing a new type of education facility at Swan Lake. This,
additional office, meeting and collaboration space, has presente
this unique facility in a range of different ways. The following
functions that are being established within the Swan Lake Centre
Outdoor Education Centre
TRCA education staff has been working with a number of organizat
education centre at Swan Lake that will meet the needs of studen
communities of York Region and surrounding areas. The vision for
centre is of a partnership facility that integrates student expe
and community outreach. Currently staff has established partners
use of program space at Swan Lake for the provision of outdoor e
Region students, the YMCA for provision of summer camp programs,
with The Dr. Eric Jackman Institute for Child Study at the Labor
Toronto to develop a research program focused on student learnin
Programming will focus on outdoor education experiences that lin
strands to learning in the natural environment.
Space at the outdoor education centre will be allocated based on
organizational needs and formal partnership agreements have been
cost-sharing structure with YRDSB and YMCA, who are the key user
outdoor education facility. These agreements build on the succes
both YRDSB and YMCA at other TRCA education centres and conserva
Office Accommodations
Presently the Boyd Centre is over capacity requiring the use of
temporary office space. The relocation of staff to Swan Lake wi
The office space is located on the second floor of the Swan Lake
20-25 staff.
Centre for Innovation in Conservation
Section 10 of TRCA's Draft 2013 Strategic Plan identifies the cr
in Conservation at Swan Lake for the purposes of pursuing and sh
to conservation. This Centre is being established to provide new
TRCA staff, as well as TRCA's wide range of public and private s
increasing demand for meeting space at TRCA's other office locat
Lake St. George Field Centre. The Centre will allow TRCA and par
unique environment away from the normal distractions of office m
innovative, collaborative solutions to key challenges related to
149
Provisions of the Licence Agreement
The licence agreements with YRDSB and YMCA provide for the commi
TRCA, YRDSB and YMCA throughout the year. Provisions have been made for the use of the
Swan Lake Centre by other boards of education and groups beyond
agreements. It is proposed that the term of the licence agreeme
one term of ten years and the provision for an additional ten ye
The agreement outlines the responsibilities of the partners, in
TRCA is responsible for the construction, administration and ope
Centre with capital and operating costs being recovered from eac
use;
each organization is responsible for the hiring, supervision and
instructional staff, as well as program materials and supplies,
establishment of a joint management committee made up of staff fYRDSB and
YMCA for the purposes of reviewing programs, policies and financi
The agreement also provides the following mutually beneficial op
provides opportunities for cross-promotion and marketing of TRCA
programs and services by the boards through their internal commu
provides mechanisms to establish research programs or projects r
education;
provides mechanisms for joint fundraising initiatives that suppo
at Swan Lake.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Construction costs for the Swan Lake Centre is estimated at $1,6
contributed by YRDSB and YMCA for development of the outdoor edu
remaining capital costs are identified in the 2013 capital budge
partners.
General operating costs, including heat, hydro, grounds maintena
estimated at $150,000 annually with $35,000 being recovered thro
arrangements with the YRDSB and YMCA and the remaining operating
future operating budgets from TRCA's municipal funding partners.
Report prepared by: Darryl Gray, 416-791-0327
Emails: dgray@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Darryl Gray, 416-791-0327; Aaron D'Souz
Emails: dgray@trca.on.ca, ajdsouza@trca.on.ca
Date: March 07, 2013
___________________________________
150
RES.#A61/13 -PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN STRATEGY UPDATE AND TERMS
OF REFERENCE
Approval of the Partners in Project Green: A Pearson Eco-Business Zone
Strategy Update; the 2013-2015 Terms of Reference for Partners i
Project GreenÔs Executive Management Committee, performance
committees and service centres; and membership of the Executive
Management Committee.
Moved by:Jim Tovey
Seconded by:Paul Ainslie
THAT the ÑPartners in Project Green: Strategy UpdateÒ report, be
THAT the Partners in Project Green Executive Management Committe
Committees, and Service Centres Terms of Reference, as outlined
approved;
AND FURTHER THAT the appointment of members to Partners in Proje
Management Committee as outlined in Attachment 3, be approved.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Partners in Project Green: A Pearson Eco-Business Zone was developed by the Greater
Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA), the Region of Peel, City of T
Mississauga and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)
surrounding Toronto Pearson into an internationally recognized c
businesses. The Partners in Project Green Steering Committee was
response to a recommendation in the approved Partners in ProjectA Pearson
Eco-Business Zone Strategy, 2008. Since then, the Steering Commi
very successful terms during which members have provided excepti
the Pearson Eco-Business Zone.
After the successful implementation of the Partners in Project Gre
years, the current Partners in Project Green Executive Committee
directional and structural changes were required in order to imp
Partners in Project Green programming and ensure that its object
evolving needs of its stakeholders. Thus an eight-month consulta
initiated in June of 2012 and came to an end in February of this
Partners in Project Green Executive Committee members endorsed t
Ñ . . . THAT the final draft of ÑPartners in Project Green: Stra Ò and 2013 -
2015 Terms of Reference be forwarded to Toronto and Region Conse
Authority for necessary approvals and follow up actions includin
the Committees and to begin the implementation of key priorities
151
Partners in Project Green: Strategy Update
Building on the current Partners in Project Green vision, existi
stakeholder consultation as well as a thorough program review an
three prong strategy was devised with the help of consultants at
endorsed by the Partners in Project Green Executive Committee to
strengths and resources are more efficiently and effectively lev
needs of its stakeholders (Attachment 1):
1.STRENGTHENING effectiveness of program mix in driving sustaina
excellence and sustainable innovation by focusing resources on f
performance areas: energy performance, water stewardship, waste
and communications and engagement.
2.STREAMLINING program delivery structure to enhance accountabil
by evolving Partners in Project GreenÔs governance structure and
performance metrics.
3.DEVELOPING new capacity for advancing sustainability innovatio
new revenues by exploring and developing new self-sustaining rev
A complete copy of the Partners in Project Green: Strategy Update is available upon req
2013 - 2015 Terms of Reference: Partners in Project Green Execut
Committee, Performance Committees and Service Centres
Recognizing the need to drive a greater degree of action and acc
Project Green Executive Committee endorsed the implementation of
structure (Figure 1 in Appendix A of the Terms of Reference) tha
major enhancements:
Executive Management Committee Ï introduction of the Executive M
within the Terms of Reference, as well as its roles and meeting
current Executive and Steering committees.
Strategic in nature and smaller than the combined Executive and
Executive Management Committee will be established as a subcommi
purpose of: assisting businesses in the Pearson Eco-Business Zon
and environmental performance; retaining and attracting green in
Eco-Business Zone; and, acting as a catalyst for new ideas, inno
improvement in the employment lands encompassed by the Pearson E
Performance Committees Ï addition of performance committees with
Reference, as well as their roles and meeting structure.
Reporting to two Executive Management Committee members, perform
established as subcommittees to the Executive Management Committ
operational objectives. As such, performance committees will be task-oriented and formed
based on Executive Management Committee priorities to: contribut
Partners in Project Green vision and Executive Management Commit
contribute to the successful development and implementation of n
Project Green programs within its four new areas of focus.
152
Service Centres Ï addition of service centres within the Terms o
roles and meeting structure.
Reporting to the Executive Management Committee, service centres
subcommittees to the Executive Management Committee (Attachment 2). As such, service
centres will be task-oriented and formed based on Executive Mana
to: contribute to the successful development and implementation
in Project Green self-sustaining revenue streams; and, contribut
Executive Management Committee's mandate.
A complete copy of the 2013 - 2015 Terms of Reference is outlined
of members is in Attachment 3.
Report prepared by: Alex Dumesle, extension 5316
Emails: adumesle@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Alex Dumesle, extension 5316
Emails: adumesle@trca.on.ca
Date: April 15, 2013
Attachments: 4
153
Attachment 1
Partners in Project Green Strategy Update
154
Attachment 2
2013 - 2015 Terms of Reference:
Partners in Project Green Executive
Management Committee, Performance Committees, and Service Centres
Background
1.
Partners in Project Green: A Pearson Eco-Business Zone was developed by the
Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA), the Region of Peel, City of Toronto, City
of Brampton, City of Mississauga and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
(TRCA) to transform the lands surrounding Toronto Pearson into an internationally
recognized community of eco-friendly businesses. The Partners in Project Green
Steering Committee was first established in 2008 in response to a recommendation
in the approved Partners in Project Green: A Pearson Eco-Business Zone Strategy,
2008. Since then, the Steering Committee has completed two very successful terms
during which members have provided exceptional support and service to the
Pearson Eco-Business Zone.
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Direction
1.1
At Authority Meeting #XX/13, held on xxxx, 2013, Resolution # xxxxx was
approved, in part, as follows:
. . . THAT the Terms of Reference for the Partners In Project Green: A
Pearson Eco- Business Zone Executive Management Committee,
Performance Committees and Service Centres , as appended, be
approved and staff be authorized to establish the Committees to begin
the implementation of key priorities; . . .
Vision
2.
The vision of Partners in Project Green is to transform the Pearson Eco-Business
Zone into an internationally recognized community known for its competitive, high
performance and eco-friendly business climate.
Executive Management Committee
3.
Mandate
3.1
Reporting to the TRCA Board (Appendix A), the Executive Management
Committee will be established as a subcommittee to TRCA with the purpose
of:
155
assisting businesses in the Pearson Eco-Business Zone to improve their
financial and environmental performance;
retaining and attracting green investment in the Pearson Eco-Business
Zone; and,
acting as a catalyst for new ideas, innovation, excellence and
improvement in the employment lands encompassed by the Pearson
Eco-Business Zone.
Roles & Responsibilities
3.2
Specifically, the Executive Management Committee will be primarily
responsible for:
providing leadership and communication among Partners in Project
Green members and supporters;
acting as a spokesperson for Partners in Project Green;
reviewing and approving the Partners in Project Green strategy and
programs as required;
reviewing and approving the Partners in Project Green budget;
monitoring overall Partners in Project Green priorities and performance;
publishing an annual report; and
providing legal, governance and issue-resolution guidance relating to
Partners in Project Green activities.
Secondary responsibilities shall include:
facilitating access to strategic partners and advisors;
where appropriate, serving as a resource and contact for media and
government relation inquiries;
appointing Chairs to Subcommittees (i.e., Performance Committees and
Service Centres); and
facilitating, initiating and directing resources to Subcommittees.
Structure
3.3
Supported by the Secretariat, the Executive Management Committee will
have a Chair and Vice-Chair, and will be comprised of fifteen (15) Voting and
as many as three (3) Advisory Members.
156
Executive Management Committee Voting Members
3.3.1
The Executive Management Committee will consist of fifteen (15)
Voting Members including the Chair and Vice-Chair, representatives
of the founding agencies (TRCA, GTAA, Region of Peel and the City
of Toronto), strategic partners, members of the business community
and a number of government representatives as follows:
GTAA
(one (1) voting representative)
One voting member will be selected from the executive
o
leadership team at the GTAA.
Business Community Leaders
(Maximum of eight (8) voting
representatives)
Eight members drawn from representatives of the Pearson
o
Eco-Business Zone business community.
TRCA
(one (1) voting representative)
The Authority Chair or other designated member of staff (Chief
o
Executive Officer or the Director of Watershed Management).
Credit Valley Conservation
(One (1) voting representative)
The Credit Valley Conservation Chair or other designated
o
member of staff (Chief Administrative Officer)
Municipality Leaders
(Four (4) voting representatives)
One representative (Councillor or Designate) from each of the
o
municipalities financially supporting PPG programming such
as the Region of Peel, City of Toronto, City of Brampton and
City of Mississauga.
Executive Management Committee Advisory Members
3.3.2
In addition to Voting Members, up to three (3) Advisory Members can
be invited to join the Executive Management Committee and support
its activities.
Federal, Provincial and/or Municipal Governments
(Maximum two
(2) advisory representatives)
One Member of Provincial Parliament, and/or one Member of
o
Parliament, and/or one municipal representative, and/or senior
staff representatives from all levels of government may be
invited to participate.
157
Business Community
(Maximum one (1) advisory representative)
An additional Advisory Member may be drawn from the
o
Pearson Eco-Business Zone, representatives of the business
community, and/or industry associations at the request of the
Voting Members of the Executive Management Committee.
Appointment Process
3.4
Membership on the Executive Management Committee will be drawn from
organizations with connections to the Pearson Eco-Business Zone based on
the following criteria:
Sector – whether the organization represents a critical sector within the
Pearson Eco-Business Zone.
Involvement with Partners in Project Green – whether the organization
has or is willing to be involved in Partners in Project Green programs.
Organizational leadership on sustainability – whether the organization has
shown sustainability leadership.
Location – whether the organization is operating and/or has a connection
to the Pearson Eco-Business Zone.
Executive Management Committee members will be appointed for a
two-year, renewable term by TRCA.
Municipalities and other levels of governments will be formally requested to
make appointments and all proposed appointments will be presented to the
Authority for formal approval.
The Chair and Vice-Chair will be elected by the members of the Executive
Management Committee.
Chair and Vice-Chair
3.5
The Executive Management Committee Chair and Vice-Chair will provide
leadership in building a shared vision and community commitment for moving
forward with a blueprint for action. The Chair will have the following additional
responsibilities:
being the primary spokesperson for Partners in Project Green at public
and official functions;
presiding over Executive Management Committee meetings, setting the
agenda and generally ensuring the effectiveness of meetings;
recruiting Subcommittee members; and
facilitating progress on Partners in Project Green initiatives in
collaboration with working group chairs.
158
In the absence of the Chair, the Vice-Chair will perform the above functions.
Business Community & Municipality Leaders
3.6
Business Community and Municipality Leaders appointed to the Executive
Management Committee, excluding the Chair and Vice-Chair, will be required
to sponsor a Subcommittee (i.e., Performance Committee or Service Centre).
As such, Business Community and Municipality Leaders will have the
following additional responsibilities:
assuming the responsibilities of Chair or Vice-Chair for a given
Subcommittee;
recruiting and appointing Subcommittee members;
communicating strategic directives issued by the Executive
Management Committee to the Subcommittee;
facilitating progress on Subcommittee initiatives;
monitoring Subcommittee progress and performance and reporting to
the Executive Management Team; and
championing green economic development in the Pearson
Eco-Business Zone.
Meetings
3.7
The Executive Management Committee will meet at least four (4) times per
year, roughly every three (3) months. Meetings are anticipated to be
approximately two (2) hours in length – at the discretion of the Executive
Management Committee – and an agenda will be distributed in advance of
meetings.
It is anticipated that members will commit at least four (4) days per year to
prepare for and attend Executive Management Committee meetings as well
as the Annual General Meeting (AGM). The Chair will have the discretion to
call additional conference call meetings if required.
Reporting
3.8
The Executive Management Committee is responsible to the broader region
and community and the overall goals of Partners in Project Green. It will be
accountable to the goals of Partners in Project Green by ensuring
measurable goals are set and monitored, assessed and reported.
The Executive Management Committee is a subcommittee of TRCA and will
regularly update the Authority on the status of Partners in Project Green
initiatives, and provide updates to municipal councils and the GTAA board as
requested.
159
Quorum & Governance
3.9
A quorum will consist of voting members in numbers greater than or equal to
one-third of the total number of voting members on the Executive
Management Committee.
Consensus-based decision making will be the preferred procedure. Formal
decisions will be based on a simple majority vote. In the event of a tie, the
Chair will cast the deciding vote.
TRCA Rules of Conduct and Purchasing Policies will be adhered to as
required.
Performance Committees
4.
Mandate
4.1
Reporting to two (2) Executive Management Committee members
(Appendix A), Performance Committees will be established as
subcommittees to the Executive Management Committee. As such,
Performance Committees will be task-oriented and formed based on
Executive Management Committee priorities to:
Contribute to the realization of the Partners in Project Green vision and
Executive Management Committee mandate; and
Contribute to the successful development and implementation of new and
existing Partners in Project Green programs.
Roles & Responsibilities
4.2
Specifically, Performance Committees will be responsible for:
advising staff on key Partners in Project Green sector specific issues;
providing sector and subject-area expertise to inform the design and/or
execution of key Partners in Project Green performance area programs;
providing market intelligence and recommendations for new performance
area program opportunities;
where appropriate, leading the design and/or execution of initiatives in
line with Partners in Project Green strategic objectives;
owning program performance metrics and reporting progress to the
Executive Management Committee; and
serving as ambassadors for the program among peer/industry groups.
160
Structure
4.3
Including the Chair and Vice-Chair, every Performance Committee will be
comprised of seven (7) to twelve (12) members who have a particular interest
in and/or expertise relevant to the major challenges of the corresponding
performance area (Appendix A).
Appointment Process
4.4
Membership on Performance Committees will be drawn from organizations with
connections to the Pearson Eco-Business Zone based on the following criteria:
Sector – whether the organization represents a critical sector within the
Pearson Eco-Business Zone.
Involvement with Partners in Project Green Project – whether the
organization has or is willing to be involved in Partners in Project Green
Project Programs.
Organizational leadership on sustainability – whether the organization has
shown sustainability leadership.
Location – whether the organization is operating and/or has a connection
to the Pearson Eco-Business Zone.
Members of each Performance Committee will be appointed for a two-year,
renewable term by the Performance Committee Chair.
Performance Committee Chairs will be appointed by the Executive
Management Committee.
Chair and Vice-Chair
4.5
Performance Committee Chairs and Vice-Chairs will be business community or
municipal representatives taken from the Executive Management Committee.
In order to ensure broad representation, the Chair and Vice-Chair of any given
Performance Committee shall not share the same company affiliation.
In general, Chairs and Vice-Chairs will provide leadership on specific initiatives
and effective communication between the Executive Management Committee
and Performance Committee, and among Performance Committees as
appropriate. The Performance Committee Chair will have the following
additional responsibilities:
being the primary spokesperson for the Performance Committee at public
and official functions;
setting work program and meeting schedule in collaboration with
Performance Committee members and the Secretariat, and presiding
over Performance Committee meetings;
recruiting Performance Committee members;
161
monitoring Subcommittee progress and performance and reporting to the
Executive Management Team; and
championing green economic development in the Pearson Eco-Business
Zone.
In the absence of the Chair, the Vice-Chair will perform the above functions.
Meetings
4.6
Performance Committees will meet at least four (4) times per year including
the Annual General Meeting (AGM), roughly every three (3) months or at the
call of the Chair. Meetings are anticipated to be two (2) hours in length and
an agenda will be distributed in advance of meetings.
It is anticipated that members will commit at least four (4) days per year to
prepare for and attend Performance Committee meetings as well as the
AGM. Meetings could be in person or via conference call.
Reporting
4.7
Performance Committees are responsible to the broader region and
community and the overall goals of Partners in Project Green. They will be
accountable to the goals of Partners in Project Green by ensuring that all
goals relevant to a given Performance Committee and approved by the
Executive Management Committee are carefully monitored, assessed and
reported.
Performance Committees are subcommittees of the Executive Management
Committee and will regularly update the Executive Management Committee
on the status of Performance Committee initiatives based on a predetermined
reporting schedule.
Quorum and Governance
4.8
A quorum will consist of one-third of the members of the Performance
Committee, including at least one of the two Chairs.
Consensus-based decision making will be the preferred procedure. Formal
decisions will be based on a simple majority vote. In the event of a tie, the
Chair will cast the deciding vote.
TRCA Rules of Conduct and Purchasing Policies will be adhered to as
required.
Staff Liaison
4.9
Additionally, the Region of Peel, City of Toronto, City of Brampton and City of
Mississauga will be requested to designate appropriate staff to liaise with
Performance Committees as required.
162
Service Centres
5.
Mandate
5.1
to the Executive Management Committee, Service Centres will be
Reporting
established as subcommittees to the Executive Management Committ
(Appendix A). As such, Service Centres
will be task-oriented and formed based
on Executive Management Committee priorities to:
contribute to the successful development and implementation of new
and existing Partners in Project Green self-sustaining profit centres; and
contribute to the realization of the Executive Management Committee’s
mandate.
Roles and Responsibilities
5.2
Service Centre committee Roles and Responsibilities will be developed by
staff, as required, with approval form the Executive Management Committee.
Secretariat
6.
The Executive Management Committee, Subcommittees and their Chairs will be
supported by a secretariat led by Partners in Project Green staff from the Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority. The Secretariat will provide facilitation, project
and program development and implementation, research and policy analysis,
administrative and recruitment support, financial management and communications.
Funding
7.
Executive Management Committee and Performance Committee members will
contribute their expertise as in-kind services. Compensation for transportation will
be provided for attendance at meetings according to TRCA policy where these are
not covered by their agency or other source. Core funding for Partners in Project
Green will come from both public and private sector organizations, with specific
funding for programs and projects being sought from a variety of funding sources.
163
APPENDIXA GovernanceStructureandDeliveryChain
The following figures illustrate Partners in Project Green governance structure and intended
value delivery chain.
Figure 1 - Governance Structure
164
Figure 2 - Governance Delivery Chain
165
Figure 3 – Typical Performance Committee Structure and Delivery Chain
166
Attachment 3
2013 - 2015 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMI
MEMBERS
The following appointments are proposed for the 2013 - 2015 Part
Executive Management Committee:
Business Leaders
1.Mike Brandt, Chief Financial Officer, Monteco Group, represent
Environment Industry Association
2.Brad Chittick, Associate-Vice President, Supply Chain Major Projects, Canadian T
3.John Coyne, Vice President General Counsel & Corporate Secreta
4.Jonathan Davies, Director, Government Relations, General Elect
5.Neil Lacheur, Vice President Property Management, Bentall Real
6.Toby Lennox, Vice President Corporate Affairs and Communicatio
7.Philip Ling, Vice President Technology, Powersmiths
8.Trevor Lui, Director of Food & Beverage, International Centre
9.Dan Pastoric, Executive Vice President and Chief Operation Off
Municipal Leaders
1.John Sanderson*, Councillor, City of Brampton
2.Chris Fonseca*, City of Mississauga
3.Councillor Bonnie Crombie*, Region of Peel
4.Shelley Carroll*, Councillor, City of Toronto
Note: *Currently confirming their re-appointment.
TRCA
1.Brian Denney, Chief Executive Officer
Credit Valley Conservation
1.Chief Administrative Officer
Advisory Members (3 optional seats)
1.Learie Miller, Advisor, Environmental Planning, Region of Peel
2.To be confirmed
3.To be confirmed
___________________________________
167
RES.#A62/13 -2013 BUDGET, OPERATING AND CAPITAL
Recommends approval of the 2013 operating and capital budget.
(Budget/Audit Res.#C3/13)
Moved by:Maria Augimeri
Seconded by:Michael Di Biase
WHEREAS the Conservation Authorities Act (CA Act) provides that
authority, in establishing its annual levy, shall have the power
of total benefit of any project afforded to all participating mu
each of them;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT, subject to such regulations u
Conservation Authorities Act as may be approved by the lieutenan
(i)all participating municipalities be designated as benefitting
in the 2013 Operating Budget;
(ii)Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) share of
programs included in the 2013 Operating Budget shall be raised f
participating municipalities as part of the General Levy;
(iii)the 2013 General Levy be apportioned to the participating m
proportion that the modified current value assessment of the who
jurisdiction of TRCA, unless otherwise provided in the levy or a
(iv)the appropriate TRCA officials be directed to advise the par
pursuant to the Conservation Authorities Act and the regulations
and to levy the said municipalities the amount of the general le
2013 Operating Budget, including property tax adjustments and no
Assessment (CVA) levy, and to levy the said municipalities the a
levy set forth in the 2013 Capital Budget and in the approved pr
THAT the 2013 Operating and Capital Budget, and all projects the
THAT staff be authorized to amend the 2013 Operating and Capital
actual 2013 provincial grant allocations in order to determine t
governed by regulation;
THAT the cost of property taxes imposed by municipalities on con
by TRCA be charged as additional levy to the respective particip
excluding the cost of property taxes which are passed on to a th
similar agreement;
THAT, except where statutory or regulatory requirements provide
authorized to enter into agreements with private sector organiza
organizations or government agencies for the undertaking of proj
to TRCA and funded by the sponsoring organization or agency;
168
THAT, as required by Ontario Regulations 139/96 and 231/97, this
the accompanying budget documents, including the schedule of mat
non-matching levies, be approved by recorded vote;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take s
necessary to implement the foregoing, including obtaining needed
signing and execution of documents.
AMENDMENT
RES.#A63/13
Moved by:Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by:Paul Ainslie
THAT the following be inserted after the main motion:
THAT the Authority request the City of Toronto to increase the T
budget contribution, beginning in 2014, by $6 million dedicated
including the Scarborough Waterfront Trail, erosion control work
for source water protection.
THE AMENDMENT WASCARRIED
RECORDED VOTE
Paul AinslieYea
Maria AugimeriYea
Ben CacholaYea
Bob CallahanYea
Ronald ChopowickYea
Vincent CrisantiYea
Glenn De BaeremaekerYea
Michael Di BiaseYea
Chris FonsecaYea
Jack HeathYea
Colleen JordanYea
Mujeeb KhanYea
Gloria Lindsay LubyYea
Glenn MasonYea
Mike MattosYea
Peter MilczynYea
Gerri Lynn O'ConnorYea
Linda PabstYea
Anthony PerruzzaYea
Deb SchulteYea
John SprovieriYea
Cynthia ThorburnYea
Jim ToveyYea
Richard WhiteheadYea
169
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WASCARRIED
THE RESULTANT MOTION READS AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS the Conservation Authorities Act (CA Act) provides that
authority, in establishing its annual levy, shall have the power
of total benefit of any project afforded to all participating mu
each of them;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT, subject to such regulations u
Conservation Authorities Act as may be approved by the lieutenan
(i)all participating municipalities be designated as benefitting
in the 2013 Operating Budget;
(ii)Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) share of
programs included in the 2013 Operating Budget shall be raised f
participating municipalities as part of the General Levy;
(iii)the 2013 General Levy be apportioned to the participating m
proportion that the modified current value assessment of the who
jurisdiction of TRCA, unless otherwise provided in the levy or a
(iv)the appropriate TRCA officials be directed to advise the par
pursuant to the Conservation Authorities Act and the regulations
and to levy the said municipalities the amount of the general le
2013 Operating Budget, including property tax adjustments and no
Assessment (CVA) levy, and to levy the said municipalities the a
levy set forth in the 2013 Capital Budget and in the approved pr
THAT the 2013 Operating and Capital Budget, and all projects the
THAT staff be authorized to amend the 2013 Operating and Capital
actual 2013 provincial grant allocations in order to determine t
governed by regulation;
THAT the cost of property taxes imposed by municipalities on con
by TRCA be charged as additional levy to the respective particip
excluding the cost of property taxes which are passed on to a th
similar agreement;
THAT, except where statutory or regulatory requirements provide
authorized to enter into agreements with private sector organiza
organizations or government agencies for the undertaking of proj
to TRCA and funded by the sponsoring organization or agency;
THAT, as required by Ontario Regulations 139/96 and 231/97, this
the accompanying budget documents, including the schedule of mat
non-matching levies, be approved by recorded vote;
170
THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such action a
implement the foregoing, including obtaining needed approvals an
execution of documents;
AND FURTHER THAT the Authority request the City of Toronto to in
annual capital budget contribution, beginning in 2014, by $6 mil
projects including the Scarborough Waterfront Trail, erosion con
acquisition for source water protection.
___________________________________
RES.#A64/13 -GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed
Lea Vivot and 11220 Highway 27 Holdings Inc., CFN 46381. Enterin
an Agreement for the purchase of property located west of Region
Road 27, north of Hedgerow Lane - Kleinburg, City of Vaughan, Re
Municipality of York, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project
2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River
watershed.
(Executive Res.#B22/13)
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT 26.50 hectares (65.48 acres), more or less, of land being P
29, Concession 9 and designated as Blocks 44, 45 and 46 on a Dra
prepared by Humphries Planning Group Inc., under their File Numb
May 17, 2012, be acquired from Lea Vivot and 11220 Highway 27 Ho
the following:
(a)THAT Lea Vivot or 11220 Highway 27 Holdings Inc. shall immedi
containing 14.32 hectares (35.38 acres), more or less, to Toront
Conservation Authority (TRCA) as part of the final approval or r
Plan of Subdivision Application 19T-08V06;
(b)THAT a permanent easement in favour of TRCA be granted betwee
V06 for the purpose of inspection of and access to
draft plan of subdivision 19T-08
Block 44;
(c)THAT Lea Vivot or 11220 Highway 27 Holdings Inc. shall grant
registerable form to TRCA to acquire Block 44 and 45, containing
(30.10 acres), more or less, and such option may be exercised up
death of Lea Vivot or the happening of any of the following:
(i)failure to pay any realty taxes in respect of Blocks 44 and 4
171
(ii)the breach of any terms, conditions or provisions of a three
between Lea Vivot, TRCA and 11220 Highway 27 Holdings Inc. in co
the purchase of the property, or any of the restrictions;
(iii)if there is any encroachment onto either Block 44 or Block
future owners of any Lots or Blocks on the Draft Plan not being
continuous, diligent and expeditious manner;
(iv)Lea Vivot does not become the registered and beneficial owne
45 by September 30, 2016.
(d)THAT Lea Vivot, TRCA and 11220 Highway 27 Holdings Inc. enter
agreement, which outlines the management framework for Blocks 44
retained by Vivot);
(e) THAT upon conveyance of Blocks 44 and 45 to TRCA, TRCA will
a period of 20 years with Lea Vivot, or a foundation established
out all rights and obligations pertaining to the management of B
THAT Lea Vivot pay all costs of TRCA of settlings, negotiations
Management, Lease and Option Agreements;
THAT the purchase price for Block 46 be $2.00;
THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance,
service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transac
possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred subject to the
tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take t
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals
execution of documents.
CARRIED
___________________________________
RES.#A65/13 -REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND
Rear of 146 Robirwin Street, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, CFN
Recommends that the TRCA-owned property located at the rear of 1
Robirwin Street, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, Rouge River wat
be retained for conservation purposes.
(Executive Res.#B23/13)
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Glenn De Baeremaeker
172
THAT item EX7.2 - Request for Disposal of Toronto and Region Con
Authority-owned Land, at the rear of 146 Robirwin Street, Town o
be deferred to Executive Committee Meeting #3/13, scheduled to b
2013.
CARRIED
___________________________________
CALL THE QUESTION
RES.#A66/13
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Ronald Chopowick
THAT the question be called on item EX7.3 - Rogers Communication
CARRIED
MOTION TO RE-OPEN
RES.#A67/13
Moved by:John Sprovieri
Seconded by:Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT item EX7.3 - Rogers Communications Inc. be re-opened.
NOT CARRIED
RES.#A68/13 -ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Proposal for Lease of Land
Petticoat Creek Conservation Area, City of Pickering, Region of
CFN 45642. Lease of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority la
located within the Petticoat Creek Conservation Area, City of Pi
Regional Municipality of Durham, to construct and operate a cell
tower and associated equipment.
(Executive Res.#B24/13)
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Gloria Lindsay Luby
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has bee
Rogers Communication Inc. to enter into a lease arrangement for
Petticoat Creek Conservation Area, City of Pickering, Regional M
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conse
cooperate with Rogers Communications Inc. in this instance;
173
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA enter into a lease with R
Communications Inc. of approximately 0.006 hectares, more or les
together with use of the existing road for access and utilities
operation of a cell phone tower and associated equipment, said l
& 30, Range 2, Broken Front Concessions, Part of Lots 29, Range
Concessions, Part of Road Allowance between Lots 28 & 29, Range
Concessions, and Part of Road Allowance between Range 2 and 3, B
Concessions, City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham;
THAT the lease with Rogers Communications Inc. be premised on th
(i)the initial term of the lease will be for five years, with th
successive five year periods subject to the concurrence of TRCA
(ii) the lease rate is to be $16,456.68 per annum;
(iii) Rogers Communications Inc. is to be responsible for all ap
construction of a cell phone tower and associated equipment;
(iv) Rogers Communications Inc. shall be solely responsible for
with the construction of a cell phone tower and associated equip
(v) any other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the TRC
THAT an archaeological review is to be completed at the expense
Communications Inc. with any mitigative measures being carried o
TRCA;
AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to ta
may be required to implement the lease, including the obtaining
and the signing and execution of any documents.
CARRIED
___________________________________
RES.#A69/13 -ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Proposal for Lease of Land
Vicinity of Lake St. George Field Centre, CFN 38134. Proposal to
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority land located north of
Bethesda Sideroad, east of Bayview Avenue, Town of Richmond Hill
Regional Municipality of York, to construct and operate a cell p
tower and associated equipment.
(Executive Res.#B25/13)
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Glenn De Baeremaeker
174
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has bee
Rogers Communication Inc. to enter into a lease arrangement for
Bethesda Sideroad, east of Bayview Avenue, Town of Richmond Hill
Municipality of York;
WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best inte
its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Aut
with Rogers Communications Inc. in this instance;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA enter into a lease with R
Communications Inc. of approximately 0.004 hectares, more or les
with use of a 0.043 hectares (0.108 acres) parcel of land for ac
construction and operation of a cell phone tower and associated
being Part of Lot 6, Concession 2, Town of Richmond Hill, Region
THAT the lease with Rogers Communications Inc. be premised on th
(i) the initial term of the lease will be for five years, with t
successive five year periods subject to the concurrence of TRCA
(ii) the lease rate is to be $16,456.68 per annum;
(iii) Rogers Communications Inc. is to be responsible for all ap
construction of a cell phone tower and associated equipment;
(iv) Rogers Communications Inc. shall be solely responsible for
with the construction of a cell phone tower and associated equip
(v) any other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the TRC
THAT an archaeological review is to be completed at the expense
Communications Inc. with any mitigative measures being carried o
the TRCA;
AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to ta
may be required to implement the lease, including the obtaining
and the signing and execution of any documents.
CARRIED
___________________________________
RES.#A70/13 -TOWN OF AJAX
Request for a Permanent Easement for the Pedestrian Bridge, Town
Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham
Carruthers Creek, CFN 48856. Receipt of a request from the Town
to provide a permanent easement for a pedestrian bridge on the e
side of Shoal Point Road, north of Range Line Road, Town of Ajax
Regional Municipality of Durham.
(Executive Res.#B26/13)
175
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Glenn De Baeremaeker
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in r
from the Town of Ajax to provide a permanent easement for a pede
east side of Shoal Point Road, north of Range Line Road, Town of
Municipality of Durham;
WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its obj
Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with
instance;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containin
1.14 hectares (2.82 acres), more or less, be granted to the Town
bridge, said land being located on east side of Shoal Point Road
Road, Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham., being as P
Registered Plan 40M-2095 and designated Part 1 and 2 on Register
THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal,
be paid by the Town of Ajax;
THAT the Town of Ajax is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and al
damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either dire
granting of this easement or the carrying out of construction;
THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any miti
carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of
THAT all TRCA lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetat
following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA sta
be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in accordance wit
landscaping guidelines;
THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Nat
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Ac
C.27, as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be directed to t
action to finalize the transaction, including obtaining needed a
execution of documents.
CARRIED
___________________________________
176
RES.#A71/13 -EMPIRE COMMUNITIES (2183 LAKESHORE BLVD.) LTD.
Lease of Land
Marine Parade Drive, West of Lakeshore Boulevard West, City of T
CFN 49033. Receipt of a request from City of Toronto and Empire
Communities (2183 Lakeshore Blvd.) Ltd. to lease lands for a sal
pavilion.
(Executive Res.#B27/13)
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Glenn De Baeremaeker
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is the
bed of Lake Ontario in front of Lot D, Range D, former Township
Toronto;
AND WHEREAS the subject lands have been turned over to the City
management, in accordance with the terms of an agreement dated O
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the lease for a sales pavilion
parking lot with Empire Communities (2183 Lakeshore Blvd.) Ltd.
commencing once Empire Communities (2183 Lakeshore Blvd.) Ltd. h
building permit, be approved;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take t
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals
execution of documents.
CARRIED
___________________________________
RES.#A72/13 -OFFICE ACCOMMODATION
Renewal of Office Space Lease at the Earth Rangers Centre, CFN 4
Approval to renew the lease for a ten-year term for approximately
square feet of office space at the Earth Rangers Centre at Kortr
Centre for Conservation.
(Executive Res.#B28/13)
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into
Rangers Foundation for office space located at the Earth Rangers
Centre for Conservation;
THAT the term of the lease be for ten years;
THAT the terms and conditions of the lease be satisfactory to TR
177
AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to ta
actions to implement the lease agreement including obtaining all
and the signing and the execution of all necessary documents.
CARRIED
___________________________________
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES.#A73/13 -SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by:Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by:Jack Heath
THAT Section II item EX8.1 - Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan,
Committee Minutes #2/13, held on April 12, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
RES.#A74/13 -SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by:Paul Ainslie
Seconded by:Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT Section II items EX8.2 - EX8.7, inclusive, contained in Exe
#2/13, held on April 12, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
Section II Items EX8.2 - EX8.7, Inclusive
ASHBRIDGEÔS BAY CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
(Executive Res.#B30/13)
BURNHAMTHORPE SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBOURHOOD RETROFIT ACTION PLAN
(Executive Res.#B31/13)
REGIONAL WATERSHED MONITORING PROGRAM
(Executive Res.#B32/13)
LOTUS NOTES SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
(Executive Res.#B33/13)
ACQUISITION OF A MEDIUM DUTY TRUCK
(Executive Res.#B34/13)
SUPPLY OF RENTAL RATES FOR AN OPERATED HYDRAULIC BACKHOE
(Executive Res.#B35/13)
___________________________________
178
SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
RES.#A75/13 -GOOD NEWS STORIES
Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority activities
January - March, 2013.
Moved by:Gloria Lindsay Luby
Seconded by:Ben Cachola
THAT the summary of Good News Stories from January - March, 2013
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlig
Conservation Authority's (TRCA) activities for the preceding few
Authority every few months. The stories for January - March, 2013
January
TRCA received $10,460 in Mountain Equipment Co-op product for ou
Program.
The W.Garfield Weston Foundation has approved continued funding
Environmental Leaders of Tomorrow program for the 2013/14 schoolA total of 60
grade six classes will be able to participate in this integrated
takes place both in the classroom and at residential field centr
TRCA has been contracted by the Town of Caledon to complete the
Mayfield West Phase 1 "Comprehensive Adaptive Management Program
valued at more than $700,000 over the next 12 years and will pro
An agreement with the Copper Creek Golf Course for TRCA to undert
monitoring activities was finalized. This work will provide $30
Cormorant management strategy was again approved by the Authorit
edge strategy, which will be featured in a book coming out in Oc
Agreement signed with Ministry of Transportation for Ontario for $3 million compensation
package for Brock North and Deer Creek Golf Course.
For many years, CAs have been struggling with the question of ho
headwater drainage features can be altered before you start to s
the aquatic system of a watershed. This has management implicat
areas, but rural areas as well. Last week, we got a bit closer
question when TRCA brought together experts from all across the
far away as Alaska and Maryland, and also included reps from the
study design that would advance the science in order to answer t
question. TRCA and its collaborators will seek publication of t
through the development of a manuscript. There was considerable
towards funding and implementing this study.
Barred owls, screech owls and great horned owls are hooting for
Forest.
Successfully removed six tonnes of scrap metal from Nashville pr
approximately $2,000 for other TRCA work.
Completed $800,000 Seaton Trail project; flagship piece being th
Forstream Road.
179
Confirmation of funding from Waterfront Regeneration Trust for 2
Restoration Projects, $238,000 total with $111,000 for TRCA supp
Partners in Project Green Materials Exchange program taking off
Whitney donated their steelcase tables to a charity diverting wa
Town of Caledon and TRCA are moving ahead with the design and de
Etobicoke Creek Trail in the Valleywood and Mayfield West commun
agreed to financially contribute towards this project.
Ten participating companies in Partners in Project Green's Energ
collectively achieved $1 million in annual energy and water savi
February
At the Annual Authority meeting Gerri Lynn O'Connor was re-electe
Augimeri re-elected as Vice Chair, and Jack Heath, John Parker an
received awards for six years of service to TRCA.
Everdale Organic Farm and Learning Centre signed lease to operat
Black Creek Community Farm. Other partners include Foodshare, Fr
and York universities.
TRCA and Town of Richmond Hill finalized MOU for the constructio
in the Oak Ridges Corridor Park. Richmond Hill is providing $590
TRCA delivers river crossing signs to Richmond Hill and York Reg
and regional roads in the spring.
Mammal and reptile biodiversity manuals just released, with inpu
Completed Embayment D project at Tommy Thompson Park. It is one
wetland gains made on the waterfront in the last 10 years.
Received $248,000 in funding in both 2013 and 2014 from York Reg
Department, complemented with $360,000 over two years from Town
implementation of the eastern portion of the spine trail on TRCA
Corridor Park.
Ministry of the Environment moving forward on recommendations in
Development Discussion (LID) Paper (TRCA/CVC/LSRCA) as part of O
Strategy.
Living City Policies website is up and ready to receive public c
Snow conditions resulted in two record setting skiing days at Al
Area.
STEP recently completed a soil management guideline document ent
Restoring Healthy Soil: Best Practices for Urban Construction". Application of improved soil
management practices during construction can reduce stormwater r
water use, produce more lush yards and landscape areas that are
maintain, and provide the growing environment needed by urban tr
March
Completed scanning of historic air photos and there are over 21,
23 different years going back to 1942, and they are available se
through flex viewer.
After several years of negotiation, Ministry of Transportation On
achieve 1:1 forest and wetland compensation on a watershed basis
disturbed for the Hwy 407 East expansion. These areas will be in
works MTO has committed to providing on the Brock lands and repr
TRCA has been able to achieve this through our work with MTO.
180
TRCA's Headwater monitoring protocol has been officially adopted
Ontario as a module in the Ontario Stream Assessment Protocol, w
standard for collecting stream data in Ontario. Ministry of Nat
conducted their first of two training sessions yesterday, which
consultants and agency staff.
TRCA receiving Ontario Trillium Foundation grant for $88,000 ove
the Pollinator Meadowscape Program in Ajax.
Canada Life Magazine named TTP 4th top place in Canada for bike
Public meeting held on coyotes in the GTA. MNR has established
conflict task force, and conservation authorities have been aske
Town Hall Challenge launched across Canada; City of Mississauga
and Mayor McCallion has challenged other cities to join her.
350 people attended second annual TRIECA Conference on stormwate
Completed environmental report cards on the health of 7 watershe
waterfront in TRCA's jurisdiction. This contributes to a provinc
Conservation Authorities in Ontario.
PPG launched the Smart Shift Challenge on February 28, 2013. The
consumption by 2 MW in Mississauga and 1 MW in Brampton. Partne
Enersource, Hydro One Brampton and PPG.
Menkes took home the top prize in the Large Enterprise Category
the competition in the Small-to-Medium Size Enterprise category
Green's Green Procurement Challenge, part of the People Power Ch
Power Challenge is a free, turn-key employee engagement program
GTA. Companies compete to gain points by encouraging employees t
and make pledges, and by implementing sustainable programs and i
sub-challenges for 2013 are: Green Procurement, Green Building a
Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks@trca.on.ca
Date: April 16, 2013
___________________________________
RES.#A76/13 -IN THE NEWS
Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority activities
- March, 2013.
Moved by:Gloria Lindsay Luby
Seconded by:Ben Cachola
THAT the summary of media coverage from January - March, 2013 be
CARRIED
181
BACKGROUND
As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlig
Conservation Authority's (TRCA) news coverage for the preceding
the Authority every few months. The stories for January - March,
Media Coverage Highlights
A search on a news archives database (FP Infomart) for the period
that mentioned TRCA or Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) produc
media hits resulted in a total circulation/reach of more than 5,
$169,000. These results only reflect a portion of media coverage
monitor on-line media, event listings, broadcast radio/tv interv
and trade publications. Eleven broadcast TV interviews were arr
The highlights below are examples of noteworthy media coverage r
January
North York Mirror, ÑHoot and Howl in North York gets in earshot
highlights an event hosted by the City of Toronto and TRCA to le
coyotes at Earl Bales Park. (2013-01-31)
King Connection, ÑKing conservation area opens SaturdaysÒ; the w
Cold Creek Conservation ÑThe best kept secret in King TownshipÒ.
the land, which is owned by Toronto and Region Conservation Auth
help of the Cold Creek stewardship committee. (2013-01-30)
Brampton Guardian, ÑDebate over downtown flood channel continues
on a $300-million upgrade to a diversion channel in downtown Bra
discussions made during a regional budget discussion in December
by TRCA, was built in 1952 following a major flood four years ea
downtown under water. The structure is out of date and unable to
growth planned for the city centre.(2013-01-29)
Mississauga News, ÑNew waterfront park takes shape in LakeviewÒ;
derelict and inaccessible stretch of the Mississauga waterfront
inviting public space boasting a curvy cobble beach and a variet
fish to flourish. More than 100 residents turned out at the Miss
what was billed as the commencement of the environmental assessm
Waterfront Connection Project. The audience got an opportunity t
project.(2013-01-23)
Pickering News Advertiser, ÑMake tracks to discover animals in P
event where TRCA will guide a group to discover the clues left b
the Altona Forest. (2013-01-05)
Alternatives Journal, ÑBest in FlowÒ; looks at six decentralized
that deal with climate change turmoil by building local resilien
with the Stormwater Assessment Monitoring and Performance Progra
Flow Balancing System. (2013-01-01)
Metroland Publications ÑYork Region Students not the only ones impacted by teacher
unrestÒ; discusses how field trips including those to Black Cree
impacted by teacher protests. (2013-01-16)
182
Digital Journal, ÑTeachers' Work to Rule Action Reaches in to th
Ontario teachers strikes and work to rule actions affecting site
including Black Creek Pioneer Village. (2013-01-03)
February
Brampton Guardian, ÑHow green is my house?Ò; a feature story on
(Sustainable Neighbourhood Retrofit Action Plan) Green Home Make
Court Neighbourhood of Brampton.(2013-02-28)
Toronto Star, ÑRavines not just for the richÒ; columnist Catheri
Toronto ravines for recreational enjoyment. Article mentions TRCAÔs efforts to organize day
trips for new immigrants.(2013-02-28)
The Globe and Mail, ÑCity parks get $5-million grantÒ; Toronto's
shot in the arm over the next three years courtesy of a $5-milli
Weston Foundation. The project is being organized by Toronto Par
volunteers, city workers and others. Registered charities and co
in partnership with the City of Toronto and TRCA. (2013-02-27)
Toronto Star, ÑHiking in winter a magical experienceÒ; Bill Tayl
winter hike including Tommy Thompson Park and Claireville Conser
(2013-02-18)
Summit County CitizenÔs Voice, ÑCity cuts are the key to curbing
includes mention of TRCA's 2010 guide - Getting to Carbon NeutraA Guide for Canadian
Municipalities. (2013-02-14)
Ajax News Advertiser. ÑBirds of a different feather flocking to D
in Durham Region. The article quotes a TRCA field biologist. (20
Torontoist, ÑHistoricist: Water Over The BridgeÒ; features the h
and the Humber River. (2013-02-02)
March
National Post, ÑGoing with the flow; Plenty of job streams in hy
spotlight on the roles and responsibilities of a TRCA hydrologisStory also appeared in
the Regina Leader Post. (2013-03-27)
Richmond HillLiberal, ÑLearn gardening tricks, tips for front yard makeoverÒ;
TRCAÔs SNAP Front Yard Makeover. (2013-03-25)
Mississauga News, Brampton Guardian ÑUse less water and winÒ; ab
the Let Your Green Show campaign, which encourages residents to
environment by using less water. The initiative is a partnership
Mississauga, Caledon, Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and TRCA,
reward residents who take simple actions to use less water. (201
Beach Mirror, ÑBeach Coyote Coalition working to protect coyotes
each otherÒ; about a new group working to protect coyotes and pe
from each other. 2013-03-22
The Midland Free Press, ÒMundy's Bay at the top of the classÒ; a
Public School in Midland which received a gold star for energy eArticle
mentions Sustainable Schools and that it is a joint initiative b
(2013-03-21)
Georgina Advocate, ÑAuthorities issue high water warningÒ. (2013
183
City Centre Mirror, ÑWard 19 could become 'Homegrown National Pa
plan being headed by the David Suzuki Foundation, which is partn
of other community organizations working toward making the city
major greening of an urban corridor and involves organizations s
Enhancement and Appreciation of Forests (LEAF), TRCA, Not Far fr
Roofs for Healthy Cities and others. (2013-03-13)
Beach Mirror, ÑKeep pets, kids away from Toronto's waterwaysÒ. (
Mississauga News, ÑMeeting looks at future of Lakeview shoreline
on the public environmental assessment of the Lakeview Waterfron
(2013-03-15)
Toronto Star ,ÑOn the Agenda- SUGARBUSH MAPLE SYRUP FESTIVALÒ;
TRCA's annual Sugarbush Maple Syrup Festival, held at Kortright
Conservation and Bruce's Mill Conservation Area. (2013-03-16)
Vaughan Citizen ÑSugarbush festival on at Kortright in VaughanÒ;
Maple Syrup Festival is under way. (2013-03-06)
Stouffville Sun-Tribune , ÑCanadians still sweet on syrupÒ; abou
Maple Syrup Festival. (2013-03-02)
thestar.com, ÑSweet syrup and stinky kids among the family event
highlights the Sugarbush Maple Syrup Festival.(2013-03-01)
Torontoist ÑWhat the Don Valley Brick Works Might Have BeenÒ; pr
the Brick Works plan and TRCAÔs involvement.(2013-03-05)
The Globe and Mail,ÑACTIVITIES AROUND THE GTAÒ; discusses things
March Break including the Sherlock Holmes Mystery at BCPV. (2013
North York Mirror, ÑBlack Creek Pioneer Village puts out call to
story about new March event at BCPV. (2013-03-02)
thestar.com, ÑMarch Break events for familiesÒ; looks at some th
Break including activities at BCPV. (2013-03-07)
Toronto Star, ÑThere's plenty for families to do around TorontoÒ
this month including activities at BCPV. (2013-03-03)
The Toronto Sun, ÑMad about MarchÒ; discusses how to keep kids
during spring holidays. (2013-03-03)
Broadcast TV interviews/tours were arranged for the following cr
Maple Syrup Festival: CP24 Breakfast, CTV News, Global News, Weather Network,
Rogers Daytime, Global TV Morning Show, OMNI TV, Accessibility TV and TFO (TV
Ontario- French) kids.
Broadcast TV interviews/tours were arranged for the following cr
Break at BCPV: Weather Network Morning Show and Fairchild TV.
Report prepared by: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632
Email: rcalpito@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632
Emails: rcalpito@trca.on.ca
Date: April 11, 2013
___________________________________
184
RES.#A77/13 -SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
Moved by:Linda Pabst
Seconded by:Deb Schulte
THAT item BAAB8.1 - 2012 Year End Financial Progress Report, contained in
Budget/Audit Advisory Board Minutes #1/13, held on April 12, 201
CARRIED
___________________________________
RES.#A78/13 -SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
Moved by:Linda Pabst
Seconded by:Glenn Mason
THAT items EX9.1 & EX9.2, contained in Executive Committee Minut
April 12, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
Section IV Items EX9.1 & EX9.2
WWK RECREATION INC. (WILD WATER KINGDOM)
(Executive Res.#B36/13)
LOWEST BID NOT ACCEPTED
(Executive Res.#B37/13)
___________________________________
ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
RES.#A79/13 -ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
Moved by:Richard Whitehead
Seconded by:Mike Mattos
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/036 items (EX10.1 - EX10.88), inclus
Executive Committee Minutes #2/13, held on April 12, 2013, be re
CARRIED
___________________________________
185
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:03 p.m., on Friday, April 26, 2013.
Gerri Lynn O'ConnorBrian Denney
ChairSecretary-Treasurer
/ks
186
MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #4/13
May 24, 2013
The Authority Meeting #4/13, was held in Weston Room B, Black C
on Friday, May 24, 2013. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called
9:34 a.m.
PRESENT
David BarrowMember
Ben CacholaMember
Bob CallahanMember
Vincent CrisantiMember
Michael Di BiaseMember
Chris FonsecaMember
Jack HeathMember
Colleen JordanMember
Mujeeb KhanMember
Gloria Lindsay LubyMember
Glenn MasonMember
Mike MattosMember
Gerri Lynn O'ConnorChair
Linda PabstMember
Anthony PerruzzaMember
Dave RyanMember
John SprovieriMember
Cynthia ThorburnMember
Richard WhiteheadMember
ABSENT
Paul AinslieMember
Maria AugimeriVice Chair
Raymond ChoMember
Ronald ChopowickMember
Glenn De BaeremaekerMember
Peter MilczynMember
John ParkerMember
Deb SchulteMember
Jim ToveyMember
187
RES.#A80/13 - MINUTES
Moved by: Linda Pabst
Seconded by: Dave Ryan
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/13, held on April 26, 2013, be ap
CARRIED
___________________________________
DELEGATIONS
(a)A delegation by Mr. Dinesh Bilimoria of 146 Robirwin Street, Whit
speaking in regard to item EX7.1 - Request for Disposal of Toron
Conservation Authority-owned Land.
RES.#A81/13 -DELEGATIONS
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:David Barrow
THAT above-noted delegation (a) be received.
CARRIED
___________________________________
PRESENTATIONS
(a)Introduction of Victoria McGrath as new Humber Watershed Special
recognition of retirement of Gary Wilkins from position as Humbe
TRCA.
(b)Recognition of Brian Graham and Jeremy Pearson for receiving the
Citizenship Award.
(c)A presentation by Joanne Jeffery, Manager, Stewardship and Outreach Education,
TRCA, in regard to item AUTH8.1 - Greening Your Grounds.
(d)A presentation by Craig Mitchell, Supervisor, Flood Infrastructur
Michael Heralall, Supervisor, Flood Risk Management and Data Man
regard to items AUTH7.3 - Flood Infrastructure State of Repair a
Protection and Remedial Capital Works Strategy.
RES.#A82/13 -PRESENTATIONS
Moved by:David Barrow
Seconded by:Linda Pabst
188
THAT above-noted presentations (a) and (b) be received.
CARRIED
.#A83/13 -PRESENTATIONS
RES
Moved by:Jack Heath
Seconded by:Chris Fonseca
THAT above-noted presentation (c) be received.
CARRIED
RES.#A84/13 -PRESENTATIONS
Moved by:Mike Mattos
Seconded by:Mujeeb Khan
THAT above-noted presentation (d) be received.
CARRIED
___________________________________
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#A85/13 -REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND
Rear of 146 Robirwin Street, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, CFN
Recommends that the TRCA-owned property located at the rear of 1
Robirwin Street, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, Rouge River wat
be retained for conservation purposes.
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:David Barrow
THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)-owned
the rear of 146 Robirwin Street, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville,
conservation purposes.
#1
AMENDMENT
Moved by:John Sprovieri
Seconded by:Michael Di Biase
THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)-owned
the rear of 146 Robirwin Street, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville,
Dinesh Bilimoria at market value and at no cost to TRCA.
RECORDED VOTE ON AMENDMENT #1
David BarrowNay
Ben CacholaNay
Bob CallahanNay
189
RECORDED VOTE ON AMENDMENT #1 Cont'd
Vincent CrisantiYea
Yea
Michael Di Biase
Chris FonsecaNay
Jack HeathYea
Colleen JordanNay
Yea
Mujeeb Khan
Gloria Lindsay LubyNay
Glenn MasonNay
Mike MattosYea
Gerri Lynn O'ConnorNay
Linda PabstYea
Anthony PerruzzaNay
Dave RyanYea
Yea
John Sprovieri
Cynthia ThorburnNay
Richard WhiteheadNay
THE AMENDMENT WASNOT CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION WASCARRIED
BACKGROUND
Correspondence via electronic mail (E-mail) has been received fr
wishes to purchase a fragment of TRCA-owned property located at
Street in the hamlet of Stouffville. A copy of the E-mail and a plan from Mr. Bilimoria is outlined
in Attachment 1. TRCA lands at this location are part of a large
(Little Rouge Creek) Limited on March 8, 2011, under the Greenla
2011-2015, Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River w.
At Executive Committee Meeting #7/12, held on September 7, 2012,
approved as follows:
THAT the potential disposal of a fragment of Toronto and Region
(TRCA)-owned property located at the rear of 146 Robirwin Street, Town of
Whitchurch-Stouffville, be referred to TRCA staff for review and discussion in accordance
with established TRCA policies;
AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Com
date recommending further action.
This request was circulated to staff of the Town of Whitchurch-S
Municipality of York and TRCA for review and comment. The follow
received:
190
TRCA Staff Comments
The subject residential lot at 146 Robirwin Street was created a
19T-04005 developed by Mattamy (Little Rouge Creek) Limited. The
boundary between the developed lands and the adjacent Greenlands
TRCA ownership) was presented in a report titled: "Mattamy Stouffville / Maio Environmental
Impact Study", prepared by LGL Environmental Research Associates, dated April
Report").
The rear lot line of the subject lot was established as the "10m
constraint. In addition to the adjacent Natural Hazard in the fo
associated with the Little Rouge Creek Tributary, the lands behi
part of the Town and Regional Greenland system and are designate
Plan Area Key Natural Heritage and Hydrologically Sensitive Feat
Schedule H of the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Official Plan.
Furthermore, the LGL Report identifies the TRCA lands at the rea
Dry-Moist Old Field Meadow and are approximately 20 metres north
Thicket Swamp. The creek itself is located roughly 50 metres sou
Planning and Development staff is of the opinion that the portio
disposal should be retained in TRCA ownership to protect the adj
from riverine flood hazards as well as for Oak Ridges Moraine na
protection, as required in the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation P
and the Town's Official Plan and Zoning By-law.
Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Staff Comments
Town staff concur with TRCA's Planning and Development staff com
recommendation to retain ownership of the subject TRCA-owned lan
Regional Municipality of York Staff Comments
York Region staff agree with TRCA's Planning and Development staff comments and
recommendation to retain ownership of the subject TRCA-owned lan
CONCLUSION
For the reasons noted in the above comments, staff is recommendi
retained by TRCA for conservation purposes.
A plan illustrating the location of the subject lands is outlinedt 2.
Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
Emails: gleja@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342, Mike Fenni
Emails: gleja@trca.on.ca, mfenning@trca.on.ca
Date: March 26, 2013
Attachments: 2
191
Attachment 1
Dinesh Bilimoria <>
To
"mfenning@trca.on.ca" <mfenning@trca.on.ca>
08/13/2012 10:38 PM
Please respond to
cc
Dinesh Bilimoria <>
Subject
Lot 55 - Wheller's Mill - Stouffville - Health and Safety Concer
Hi Mike,
We had discussed about our home backyard design over the phone.
We would like to inform you that the current backyard design has Health and Safety concern issues. The
pointing fence inside has been affecting us whenever we use the backyard. It is not a recommended
design since it causes harm and injury. We would like to have this corrected as shown in the attached
document.
Thanks,
Dinesh Bilimoria
192
193
Attachment 2
___________________________________
194
RES.#A86/13 -HIGHWAY 407 EAST EXTENSION DETAILED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION
PROCESS
Request that the Minister of the Environment confirm that provin
interests related to natural hazards ,natural heritage and water
management are being addressed during the detailed design and
construction process for the Ministry of Transportation's (MTO)
407 East Extension project, and that the interests of the citize
Ontario are addressed.
Moved by:Colleen Jordan
Seconded by:Dave Ryan
WHEREAS in June 2010 the Ontario Minister of the Environment (MO
of the Highway 407 East Transportation Corridor Environmental As
Extension EA) to allow for the extension of Highway 407 by 50 km
City of Pickering to Highway 35/115, within the jurisdictions
Conservation Authority (TRCA), Central Lake Ontario Conservation
and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA);
AND WHEREAS detailed design and construction is proceeding at an
with Phase 1 scheduled for completion in late 2015, including an
Brock Road in the City of Pickering to Harmony Road in the Town
AND WHEREAS through the environmental assessment process, TRCA p
technical clearance on preliminary issues related to natural haz
water management with the expectation that TRCA review would con
detailed design stage;
AND WHEREAS the MTO Environmental Protection Requirements for Tr
Planning and Highway Design, Construction, Operation and Mainten
specifically outlines provisions for highway design and construc
Conservation Authorities Act;
AND WHEREAS TRCA has been advised that modifications are being m
highway design approved through the Environmental Assessment (EA
changes to alignment and size of crossing structures;
AND WHEREAS MTO recently advised TRCA, CLOCA and GRCA that they
limited technical review role in the detailed design process for
Extension project;
AND WHEREAS TRCA is concerned that its provincially delegated re
ensuring risk to life and property through flooding and erosion
protection of the citizens of Ontario, are not being addressed i
Extension project;
AND WHEREAS TRCA is concerned that its mandated responsibility t
watershed management programs to encourage the conservation and
natural resources are not being addressed in the Highway 407 Eas
195
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA requests the Minister of
as the provincial authority for the Highway 407 East Extension E
Assessment, to provide clear direction to the Ministry of Transp
conservation authority roles and responsibilities in the detaile
process for this project so that assurances made during the envi
are confirmed;
AND FURTHER THAT the Town of Ajax, the City of Pickering and the
Municipality of Durham, CLOCA, GRCA and Conservation Ontario, as
of Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Ontario Ministry
Infrastructure Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs an
Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada be so advised.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Highway 407 project was initiated by MTO in the 1980s, and w
four sections: Central, 407 West, 407 East Partial and 407 East
design review of the Central and East Partial sections, the prov
process whereby TRCA reviewed and provided sign-off on significa
watercourse crossings, structure modifications, impacts to flood
channel designs, geomorphological assessments, hydraulics, storm
environmental management plans, and vegetation restoration plans
that this process is not being followed in the Highway 407 East
Significant Natural Features
The Highway 407 East Extension project crosses 12 watersheds, in
TRCA's jurisdiction it will cross both the Duffins and Carruther
highway will be constructed on the Oak Ridges Moraine, in an are
groundwater recharge . Many of the watercourses are coldwater st
for a diverse and sensitive aquatic community. The highway will
ANSI (the Duffins Creek Valley Regional Life Area); five provinci
Wetland, Lynde Creek Coastal Wetland, Harmony Farewell Iroquois
Grove Wetland Complex and Whitby-Oshawa Iroquois Beach Wetland C
Environmentally Significant Areas (ESA) (none of which are in TR
number of unevaluated wetlands.
407 East Transportation Corridor EA (Highway 407 Extension)
In 2010, after five years of study, the Ministry of the Environm
407 East Extension. The project involves a 50 kilometre extensio
Road in the City of Pickering to Highway 35/115, and includes tw
with Highway 401 (Attachment 1). TRCA, CLOCA and GRCA were involved in the review
EA and their comments on the final EA and responses were include
report.
196
The highway corridor itself will be constructed in two phases. P
of 32 km of highway from east of the Brock Road interchange in P
Road in Oshawa, and is scheduled to be completed in 2015. The de
is currently underway as is preparation of the land and clearing
TRCA jurisdiction. The remaining segments of work fall within C
remaining 18 kilometres of highway will be built as part of Phas
GRCA's jurisdictions.
EA Commitments
Section 8 of the EA provides commitments, including but not limi
detailed design of bridges and culverts, channels, stormwater ma
trails and utilities; and,
monitoring of ecological sensitive features, including groundwat
and fish habitat, significant species and areas, and landscape c
Section 9 of the EA summarizes project commitments and monitorin
conservation authorities (CAs) include:
confirmation of a Butternut Tree Strategy (CA input relates to r
salvaging and relocation of rare vegetation species;
development of vegetation and restoration plans;
consultation on edge management plans;
refinement of stormwater management facilities and determination
finalization of stormwater management plans.
During the EA, there was a significant amount of work completed
the bridges and culverts, as well as the associated channel work
of, and design considerations for, geomorphological, hydrogeolog
wildlife and hydrotechnical (hydrologic modeling, water level cl
and downstream water levels, velocities for a range of storm eve
TRCA was assured that it would have the opportunity to review th
reports (DCR) that would be required during the detailed design
Responsibilities of Conservation Authorities
In the review of detailed design of provincial projects, CAs mai
responsibilities including:
Provincially Delegated Responsibility for Natural Hazards
Conservation Ontario (CO), in partnership with the Ministry of N
the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH), signed Mem
Understanding (MOU) to ensure projects prevent, eliminate, or re
property from flooding and erosion.
Provincially Mandated Responsibility Watershed Management for th
Restoration of Natural Resources
CAs have a mandated responsibility to undertake watershed manage
encourage the conservation and restoration of natural resources.
197
The Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Environmental Protection Requirements for
Transportation Planning and Highway Design, Construction, Operation and Maintenance
(2010)
CAs are to provide comment on highway design and construction is
water, including impacts to existing water balance, protecting u
human and non-human land and water uses, impacts to the quality
changes in erosion potential and flood risk.
Municipal Advisory Services
CAs provide environmental advisory services to municipalities th
or memorandums of understandings with participating municipaliti
approved program activity, covering areas of technical expertise
hazard and water management. TRCA has a memorandum of understand
Regional Municipality of Durham to provide these services.
RATIONALE
TRCA, together with CLOCA and GRCA share a concern that provinci
the Highway 407 East Extension project meets technical standards
An open review process is
natural heritage and water management are not being addressed.
currently not being executed between MTO and the CAs.
Fulfillment of Provincial Obligations
It is the responsibility of CAs to act on behalf of those within
eliminate or reduce the risk to life and property from flooding
protection and regeneration of natural resources. CAs are respo
updating the flood modeling on a watershed scale, and have the l
with our municipal partners to ensure the interests of the publi
strong presence in the communities and have developed good relationships with local and
municipal residents and staff.
It is TRCAs understanding that in order to fulfil the obligation
Notice of Approval to Proceed, MTO and its consultants would emb
be similar to, if not identical to, the process required by the
Highway 407 East Partial sections. As resolved through ministerial direction for these earlier
sections of the highway, CA review and comment on detailed desig
hazard and water management was required in order for the Minist
time to ensure, on behalf of the citizens of Ontario, that these
On April 5, 2013, TRCA, CLOCA and GRCA received a joint letter f
A copy of the
that MTO would not be seeking CA review and concurrence with des
full letter is provided as Attachment 2.
198
TRCA staff is concerned that there is a lack of CA input in the
project, and that this lack of input into the detailed design pr
to natural hazard, natural heritage or water management not bein
the first DCR, staff noted that the structures and channel desig
are being modified and that there was insufficient detail provid
Although infrastructure projects undertaken by
unable to undertake a comprehensive review.
the Crown are exempt from regulatory approvals under the Conservation Authorities Act, the
best practice of provincial agencies has routinely been to engag
technical review on a best efforts basis. It was noted in the EA
to the CAs including updated models and hydraulics. The DCRs hav
lacking that detailed information required for a comprehensive r
Other information including stormwater management, natural chann
removal and restoration plans that were routinely provided to TR
committed to in this project, are not being provided to CAs for
At this time, TRCA is concerned that the construction of the High
project may cause flooding or erosion both downstream, and immed
project area. With proper study and modelling review, the reside
of Durham, the City of Pickering and the Town of Ajax, can be as
increased risk from the design and construction of this project.Additionally, it should also be
noted that the MTO Environmental Protection Requirements for Transportation Pla
, Construction, Operation and Maintenance (2010) specifically outlines
Highway Design
provisions for highway design and construction meeting the Conservation Authorities Act for
issues related to surface water, including impacts to existing w
upstream and downstream human and non-human land and water uses,
At this time, the provisions set
of surface water and changes in erosion potential and flood risk
forth in this guideline document have not been satisfied for thi
Confirmation of the Role of TRCA in the 407 East Extension Project
TRCA is respectfully requesting that the Minister of the Environ
conditions of the EA and provide clear direction as to how provi
hazards, natural heritage and water management are to be address
optimization process. TRCA is concerned that commitments made in
natural hazards, natural heritage and water management have not
detailed design stage work that is currently underway for this p
detailed design process for the 407 East Partial project, there
provincial responsibilities, and similar concerns that watershed
At that time, TRCA requested clarification from the Minister of t
not being addressed.
Environment regarding its roles related to natural hazard, natur
management review responsibilities at the detailed design stage.
minister required that MTO obtain written authorization to proce
A formal review and approval process was developed and successfuly
including TRCA.
followed. Provincial standards related to natural hazard, natura
management were subsequently addressed through the detailed desi
processes.
199
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Send a letter to the Minister of the Environment with copies to
Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, CLOCA, GRCA, Conserv
the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Ontario Ministry of Natu
Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Envi
and Oceans Canada.
Report prepared by: Beth Williston, extension 5214
Emails: bwilliston@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5214
Emails: bwilliston@trca.on.ca
Date: May 14, 2013
Attachments: 2
200
Attachment 1
201
Attachment 2
202
___________________________________
203
RES.#A87/13 -FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE STATE OF REPAIR
2013 report on TRCA's flood infrastructure state of repair.
Moved by:Mike Mattos
Seconded by:Mujeeb Khan
THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Flood
Flood Infrastructure State of Repair Report be updated and repor
bi-annually.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
One of TRCA's goals is to design, install and maintain structure
damage to property from natural hazards such as erosion and floo
in 1954, TRCA has constructed numerous structures that help prot
These structures can take the form of dams, channels and dykes.
Over time, these structures degrade in ways that affect their ab
of flood protection infrastructure owned by TRCA was built betwe
design life of these types of structures is typically around 50
need of some major repairs to extend their functional life. The
vegetation, failed or shifted concrete panels and erosion of cha
capacity for some of the channels. Some of TRCAÔs dams were buil
and are in need of major repairs to meet current dam safety guid
The highly urbanized characteristics of watersheds in the GTA re
infrastructure function in the way that they were designed. Fai
to perform puts property and lives at risk. On August 19, 2005
as much as 153 mm of rain in Toronto. The storm overwhelmed sew
flooding in many areas of the city. It is estimated by the Insu
storm caused $640 million in damages making it the third costlie
This storm was a powerful reminder of the devastation flooding c
environment.
The purpose of the Flood Infrastructure State of Repair Report i
of repair of TRCA-owned flood infrastructure and to raise awaren
capital investments that will be required to maintain proper flo
owns 10 dams and 15 flood control structures (channels and other
examines each structure and categorizes them in terms of the "im
"probability of failure" using a risk management matrix. Each s
location by region or municipality and current major deficiencie
Over the last ten years TRCA has made significant investments to
flood protection structures in order to meet its obligation of p
damage. The role of the Flood Management Service, the Lakes and
(LRIA) Dam Safety Guidelines, risk management and future capital
in the report.
204
Flood Management Service
In 2009, TRCA created the Flood Management Service (FMS) within
goal of this program was to better respond to issues regarding f
infrastructure. TRCA combined specialties in water resources en
maintenance, risk management, data acquisition and hydrometrics
risk to life and property within the TRCA jurisdiction by provid
data and support to TRCA's municipal/regional partners and the p
watershed conditions 24/7 and issues Flood Messages to TRCA's pa
actions can be taken to ensure public safety. FMS also identifi
coordinates with stakeholders to mitigate the risk, and develops
the public and governmental agencies about the hazards of floodi
A large part of FMSÔs role within TRCA is to manage, monitor and
protection structures located throughout the GTA. FMS conducts
inspections on each structure depending on the level of risk and
surveillance. For example, large dams with high associated risk
monthly and annual inspections. Small, lower risk structures su
may receive only an annual inspection. The results of these ins
if the structure is performing as designed and to prioritize cap
of the structure.
Ontario Dam Safety Guidelines
In August 2011, the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR)
Rivers Improvement Act Administrative Guide, Technical Bulletins
Practices Guide, also know as the Ontario Dam Safety Guidelines
are based on criteria developed by the Canadian Dam Association
guidelines for the safe design, construction, management and ope
is a resource for engineers, operators and owners to use when as
The ODSG is not regulatory, but rather a document that defines b
and therefore the minimum standard of safety for dam owners.
A critical component of the ODSG is the Hazard Potential Classifi
determines the risk to the public if a dam were to fail. The hi
safety requirements are for a dam. Table 1 outlines the criteri
dams.
Table 1 - Hazard Potential Classification
HAZARD POTENTIALLIFE SAFETYPROPERTY LOSSES
LOW No potential loss of life.Damage not to exceed $300,000
SIGNIFICANT No potential loss of life.Damage not to exceed $3 Million
HIGH Potential loss of life of 1-10 Damages not to exceed $30
persons.Million
VERY HIGH Potential loss of life of 11 or more Damages in excess of $30 Million
persons.
205
TRCA currently owns four dams that have HPCÔs of Very High which
potential loss of life of 11 or more persons in the event of a d
Dam Safety Review of G. Ross Lord Dam estimated that there would
and $1.3 billion in property and infrastructure damage if the da
conditions.
TRCA has adopted the ODSG into its dam safety program and is in
each structure to meet the guidelines contained in the ODSG wher
technical difficulties in bringing each structure up to meet mod
dams were constructed using the engineering principles of the pe
and may not meet newer requirements unless substantial investmen
old dams that were built without any proper engineering or const
be able to meet ODSG guidelines. In these cases options are limi
dam or risk management.
Risk Management
The Canadian Dam Association defines risk as Ñthe consequence of
probability of such an event occurringÒ. The principles of dam
providing protection that is As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP). It is recognized in the
dam safety community that if an infinite amount of money was ava
could be reduced to zero. For obvious reasons this is not possi
techniques, however, it is possible to greatly reduce risk. The
relatively high standard of safety by using advanced engineering
managing and accepting risk. When hazards are greater for a par
requirements are proportionately more rigorous to offset the inc
TRCA recognizes the risk in owning and operating flood control s
making improvements to reduce hazards and increase safety. In o
the TRCA performs the following:
1.TRCA evaluates each structure and determines what the impacts wo
structure failed or performed below its design criteria.
2.The structure is inspected to identify any deficiencies that cou
fail. Channels and other flood control devices can fail by eros
blockages. Deficiencies that can led to a dam failure are also k
A failure mode is the process by which dam collapse happens. Dam
types of failure modes:
Overtopping - where the dam is overwhelmed by incoming flows;
Collapse - this can occur because of earthquake, overloading of
due to poor design and other component failures;
Internal Erosion - where embankment materials are leached from t
embankment in uncontrolled seepage through the structure.
3.A repair to mitigate the potential failure mode or hazard is desi
implemented when funding is available.
206
Each structure has undergone a risk assessment and is listed in
capital improvements and results are used to illustrate how floo
terms of risk. Structures can be moved to higher risk categorie
deteriorate or, conversely, risk is reduced as they are repaired
that there are limitations to determining risk. The complexity
difficult to quantify and therefore determining the probability
training and engineering judgment are used to assess the stabili
infrastructure.
TRCA Flood Infrastructure State of Repair
The following outlines the current Ñstate of repairÒ of TRCA-own
structure is inspected annually and the results are examined and
works projects. TRCA uses Hatch Energy LimitedÔs rating system
of a structure. Hatch Energy is an international consulting fir
engineering and has been retained by TRCA for several dam safetyAttachment 2
summarizes the criteria for evaluating structures.
The process for evaluating structures is somewhat subjective. W
inspection techniques it is not possible to say with certainty t
Inspections can identify potential failure modes but the complex
placed upon structures cannot be precisely measured and so there
unpredictability in evaluating them. TRCA uses current industry
structures. Attachment 3 lists all flood control structures owned by TRCA and
of repair.
FMS has incorporated the above-noted deficiencies into its annua
monitors each structure for issues that may alter the priority o
Current Workplan and Funding
TRCA is moving forward with improving the performance and reliab
infrastructure. Major capital works have been identified and en
developed. Table 2 outlines the current funding for flood infra
for 2013. These funds are used to support ongoing inspection an
funding requests for specific, large scale construction projects
maintenance) will be required in the future once the appropriate
completed.
Table 2 - TRCA Flood Infrastructure Funding Levels for 2013
TRCA Funding PartnerTotal Contribution to Flood
Infrastructure for 2013
Peel Region$260,000*
Durham Region$22,000
City of Toronto$256,000*
York Region$250,000*
207
* Peel Region, City of Toronto and York Region have approved en
for flood infrastructure maintenance. These values are included
$200,000 of the Peel Climate Change: Flood Remedial Works progra
Infrastructure. The City of Toronto contributed $200,000 from T
request for erosion and flood control infrastructure maintenance
and additional $200,000 in 2013 to advance the work on Stouffvil
(through the Flood Protection and Remedial Capital Works budget)
Additional Funding from the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resource
The Ministry of Natural Resources is assisting conservation auth
maintenance activities throughout Ontario with the Water and Ero
Program (WECI). Under this program, projects and studies undert
eligible for 50% matching funds from the Province of Ontario. T
complete major projects such as the Yonge/York Mills Channel Maintenance Repair ($1 million
total cost) and the G. Ross Lord Dam Safety Review ($150,000 totYork
Mills Channel Maintenance Repair involved concrete repairs and d
resulted in 12 homes being removed from the regional floodplain.
projects have been completed with the funds available from WECI.
was scaled back by 50% by the provincial government in 2012 whic
get funding in the future.
TRCA has identified priority projects for the next five years.
Albion Hills Dam (Peel);
Black Creek/Scarlett channel maintenance (Toronto);
Stouffville Dam concrete remediation (York);
Pickering/Ajax Dyke (Durham);
G. Ross Lord Dam gate repair and generator replacement (Toronto/York); and
Secord Dam (Durham).
As annual inspections of the infrastructure take place, prioritie
significant negative changes to the condition of a particular st
respond to serious deficiencies in flood infrastructure depends
as large capital remediation projects can take several years to
permits and availability of contractors. Currently TRCA receive
minor maintenance but large capital repairs will be required in
CONCLUSIONS
TRCAÔs inventory of flood infrastructure is aging and in some ca
life. There are a multitude of forces acting upon these structur
in preventing flooding. Under the current funding regime, TRCA
and performing capital improvements as they become necessary. H
very large in scope and require substantial funding that is not
projects will take multiple years to complete because of the com
process. In the case of a dam decommissioning, public consultat
Assessment may be required.
With the support of the Province's WECI program, several importa
been successfully undertaken in recent years. However, this pro
2012 with the potential for even greater cuts in the future.
208
Flooding remains a serious threat to the GTA. Weather is unpred
can happen at any time. Climate change may increase the likelih
events combined with the dense urbanization of TRCA's watersheds
placed upon TRCAÔs flood infrastructure. To respond to this thr
flood infrastructure is performing at the highest level of prote
designed repairs and stable funding will each ensure that TRCAÔs
continue to minimize the possibility of catastrophic flooding in
Report prepared by: Laurian Farrell, extension 5601
Emails: lfarrell@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Craig Mitchell, (416) 212-2410
Emails: cmitchell@trca.on.ca
Date: April 10, 2013
Attachments: 3
209
Attachment 1
Risk Management Matrix for Prioritizing TRCA Flood Infrastructur
S
Considerable Monitoring Manage and Monitor RisksExtensive Management and
I
RequiredMonitoring Required
G. Ross Lord Dam
G
Claireville DamStouffville Dam
N
Milne DamYonge/York Mills Channel
I
Stouffville ChannelPickering/Ajax Dyke
F
Bolton Channel
I
C
A
N
IT
M
M
Accept but Monitor RiskManagement and MonitoringManage and Monitor
P
O
Black Creek DamBlack Creek ChannelOsler Dam
A
D
Woodbridge ChannelScarlett Road ChannelMimico/Malton Channel
C
E
Etobicoke LeveeBrampton ChannelSheppard Channel
T
R
Palgrave DamAlbion Hills Dam
A
Tyndall Flood WallSecord Dam
Dixie/Dundas Channel
T
Dixie/Dundas Levee
E
M
Accept RiskAccept but Manage RiskConsiderable Management
I
Required
Glen Haffy Dam
N
Malvern Channel
O
R
LOWMEDIUMHIGH
PROBABILITY
210
Attachment 2
Flood Infrastructure State of Repair Evaluation
RANKINGDESCRIPTION
No existing or potential deficiencies are recognized
Satisfactory
Safe performance anticipated under all prescribed loading
conditions
No existing or potential deficiencies are recognized under norma
Fair
loading conditions
Infrequent extreme events might result in a safety or performanc
deficiency
Potential safety deficiency is recognized for unusual loading
Conditionally Poor
conditions
Used when there is uncertainty associated with analytical parame
that identify a potential safety or performance deficiency
Further investigations and studies are necessary
Potential safety or performance deficiency is clearly recognized
Poor
normal loading conditions
Immediate action to resolve deficiency is recommended
A safety or performance deficiency exists for normal conditions
Unsatisfactory
Immediate remedial action is required
211
Attachment 3
Flood Infrastructure Condition, Risk and Deficiencies
STRUCTURE CURRENT IMPACT OF PROBABILITY MAJOR ESTIMATED
12
NAMECONDITIONDEFICIENCIES COST FOR
FAILUREOF FAILURE
3
REMEDIATION
REGION OF PEEL
Albion Hills DamPOORMODERATEHIGHOutflow pipes Replacement
failing. Dam need $800,000 - $1M
to be replaced or
Decommissione
decommissioned.d -$400 000
Claireville DamFAIRSIGNIFICANTLOWControl room and $200,000 -
HVAC upgrades $400,000
required. Major
gate maintenance
required.
Palgrave DamSATISFACTORYMODERATELOW
Brampton SATISFACTORYSIGNIFICANTMODERATE
Channel
Tyndall Flood SATISFACTORYMODERATELOW
Wall
Glen Haffy DamSATISFACTORYMINORLOW
Woodbridge SATISFACTORYMODERATELOW
Channel
Bolton ChannelSATISFACTORYSIGNIFICANTMEDIUM
Etobicoke LeveeSATISFACTORYMODERATELOW
Dixie/Dundas FAIRMODERATELOWArmour stone wall $100,000
Channelfailing.
Dixie/Dundas SATISFACTORYMODERATELOW
Levee
Mimico/Malton CONDITIONALLY MODERATEHIGHExtensive sediment $50,000
ChannelPOORand vegetation is
restricting flow.
YORK REGION
Stouffville DamFAIRSIGNIFICANTMODERATEConcrete control $300.000 - $1M
structure failing.
Stouffville SATISFACTORYSIGNIFICANTLOW
Channel
Milne DamSATISFACTORYSIGNIFICANTLOW
212
STRUCTURE CURRENT IMPACT OF PROBABILITY MAJOR ESTIMATED
12
NAMECONDITIONDEFICIENCIES COST FOR
FAILUREOF FAILURE
3
REMEDIATION
CITY OF TORONTO
G. Ross Lord FAIRSIGNIFICANTMEDIUMMajor gate $500,000
Dammaintenance
required. Back-up
generator needs to
be replaced.
Black Creek FAIRMODERATELOWSediment has filled $150,000
Damreservoir reducing
flood storage.
Yonge/York Mills FAIRSIGNIFICANTMEDIUMSediment and $500,000
Channelvegetation in
channel.
Sheppard CONDITIONALLY MODERATEHIGHDisplaced concrete $400,000
ChannelPOORchannel panels.
Heavy
sedimentation and
vegetation.
Scarlett ChannelCONDITIONALLY MODERATEMEDIUMDisplaced concrete $1,000,000
POORchannel panels.
Heavy
sedimentation and
vegetation.
Black Creek CONDITIONALLY MODERATEMEDIUMDisplaced concrete $2,000,000
ChannelPOORchannel panels.
Heavy
sedimentation and
vegetation.
Malvern ChannelUNSATISFACTORYMINORHIGHCollapsed gabion $1,000,000
walls and severe
erosion.
DURHAM REGION
Secord DamPOORMODERATEHIGHEarth embankment Replacement -
failing. Dam needs $1,000,000
to be replaced or Decommission -
decommissioned.$400,000
Osler DamUNSATISFACTORYMODERATEHIGHStop log control Replacement -
structure failing. $250,000
Dam needs to be Decommission -
replaced or $150,000
decommissioned.
Pickering/Ajax CONDITIONALLY HIGHMEDIUMLarge erosion scar.$100,000
DykePOOR
1
Impact of Failure refers to the consequences of an adverse even
and environmental costs.
2
Probability of Failure refers to likelihood of the structure su
3
Estimated Cost of Repairis based on similar projects TRCA has conducted in the past, Ac
___________________________________
213
RES.#A88/13 -FLOOD PROTECTION AND REMEDIAL CAPITAL WORKS STRATEGY
Report on risk assessment and prioritization of flood vulnerable
within TRCA watersheds.
Moved by:Mike Mattos
Seconded by:Mujeeb Khan
THAT the Flood Protection and Remedial Capital Works Strategy fo
consultation with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (T
municipal partners to set priorities for future flood remediatio
budget requests;
AND FURTHER THAT all of TRCA's municipal partners be so advised
Management Service.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Flood protection is an important function of TRCA. Within the l
several costly storms has heightened the awareness of risks asso
has provided a renewed urgency to assess the existing flood risk
2006, the Authority authorized the development of TRCA's Flood P
Capital Works Study, and Philips Engineering Ltd. (now AMEC Eart
was retained to complete the study. This report provides a summ
1980 Flood Protection Plan
In 1980, TRCA developed a Flood Protection Plan that envisioned
consisting of engineered flood protection works, policy tools an
contain and manage flood risk within the flood hazard area. At the time, the Flood Control
Program identified 31 flood damage centres (consisting of multip
proximity) as well as 210 less spatially extensive flood sites,
conditions. Since that time, TRCA has experienced continued grow
urbanization in all of TRCA's watersheds. There have also been i
to characterize the hydrologic and hydraulic processes operating
and to develop deterministic models which allow for better estim
rainfall. These systemic changes to watershed characteristics ar
well as improvements to our tools and data. This has resulted in
as originally determined in the 1980 Flood Protection Plan, with
vulnerable sites identified.
2013 Flood Protection and Remedial Capital Works Strategy
TRCA has developed a Flood Protection and Remedial Capital Works
this program include the development and updating of the Flood P
consultation with TRCA's local and regional municipal partners o
identified, consultation with Planning staff on upcoming develop
outreach and education about flood risks.
214
This board report speaks to the findings of the AMEC Engineering
Remedial Capital Works Study, which resulted in the creation of
Strategy. Based on the latest watershed hydrology and hydraulic
flooding risks have been identified with high concentrations of Attachment 1).
These areas are referred to as "flood clusters" or "damage centr
Strategy is intended to provide an understanding of the risk ass
damage centres, to furnish a quantitative measure of the flood r
centers according to the risk measure, and provide recommendatio
where possible. The Flood Protection Strategy will inform TRCAÔs
management initiatives, ensuring capital works funding is direct
providing the greatest risk reduction per dollar spent.
The risk assessment at the core of the Flood Protection Strategy
developed for the 1980 Flood Control Plan, and uses a flood-pron
considers several factors related to:
the importance of the area to the larger community;
the flood risk and exposure associated with the site (depth, war
risk);
emergency access (human and vehicular ingress and egress, emerge
roadway design);
flood damage costs (direct and indirect costs).
Each of these factors was assigned a numerical score for each si
of the attributes of the area, such as relation to transportatio
population, topographic nature and river flow mechanics. Sites w
on their cumulative score (higher cumulative scores indicating g
Attachment 2 summarizes the results of the risk assessment and pr
clusters, and Attachment 1 provides a visual summary of the floo
cluster. It is evident that the highest risk areas are business/
where the economic impact tends to elevate these areas to the to
this reason, Attachment 3 is provided where areas that are predominantly resid
relative to each other.
An assessment of measures for reducing or remediating the flood r
undertaken, with various measures considered with the objective
extent or impact. Among the alternatives considered were bridge and culvert upgrade
channel improvements, flood-proofing of buildings, detention or
property acquisitions. Flood reduction measures were assessed as
implementation, however this assessment is of a preliminary and
conceptual nature of the flood remediation measures, but is suff
making process to identify priority sites for detailed study. Attachment 4 provides a visual
summary of the cost of proposed remediation options for each flo
215
Flood Remediation Recommendations
The main benefit of the Flood Protection Strategy is that it pro
vulnerable areas based on current flood risk. This will allow s
planning and to best direct capital budgets toward remediation p
risk. The Strategy is an important tool that will be shared with
expected that the Strategy will be used to frame dialogue with m
as well as affected stakeholders, and to provide a reference for
municipal/regional or private remediation opportunities and init
provides a "roadmap" for action, each individual flood vulnerabl
an Environmental Assessment prior to the implementation of any r
selected projects will be highlighted in the Flood Management Se
Future Projects
Some of the 42 potential flood remediation projects will be smal
replacement to alleviate flooding). However, the majority of the
construction projects involving multiple stakeholders and comple
existing landuse and environmental and social considerations. Fl
expected to be multi-year projects requiring significant capital
municipalities and other stakeholders will be essential for logi
required funding over several years. It is anticipated that most
special funding asks.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for the development and implementation of the Flood Prot
in capital account 107-02 which receives funds from Peel, York and Toronto. In addition to
remedial works, this account supports other flood management act
and education, data management and the Flood Forecasting and War
Report prepared by: Michael Heralall, extension 5703
Emails: mheralall@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Michael Heralall, extension 5703 or Lau
5601
Emails: mheralall@trca.on.ca or lfarrell@trca.on.ca
Date: November 10, 2013
Attachments: 4
216
Attachment 1
217
Attachment 2
TABLE 1. FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND PRIORITIZATION
Total
12
Direct Average Indirect Average
RankWatershedClusterMunicipality
Flood Risk
Annual Flood Annual Flood
Damages ($)Damages ($)
Score
1Don RiverNewkirk Business Park230,327,39534,549,109294Richmond Hill
2Humber RiverVaughan Central25,255,2593,788,289278Vaughan
3Highland CreekDorset Park42,532,4496,379,867271Toronto
4Etobicoke CreekBrampton Central12,006,6671,801,000269Brampton
5Don RiverHillsview8,922,6151,338,392266Richmond Hill
6Etobicoke CreekDixie/Dundas SPA136,097,69720,414,655262Mississauga
7Don RiverNew Westminster689,107103,366259Richmond Hill
8Etobicoke CreekLittle Etobicoke6,464,283969,642253Mississauga
9Humber RiverJane/Wilson11,167,7701,675,166220Toronto
10Humber RiverRockcliffe5,413,842812,076213Toronto
11Don RiverMaple150,60722,591209Vaughan
12Highland CreekKennedy Commons28,897,1144,334,567205Toronto
13Highland CreekProgress Business Park16,559,9632,483,994186Toronto
14Duffins CreekPickering Village2,680,534402,080185Pickering/Ajax
15Don RiverVellore Woods510,30976,546173Vaughan
16Etobicoke CreekAvondale109,388,60016,408,290172Brampton
17Highland CreekUpper Centennial61,0669,160171Toronto
18Don RiverIonview3,784,490567,674167Toronto
19Don RiverConcord683,717102,558166Vaughan
20Etobicoke Creek West Mall 16,543,4472,481,517164Toronto
21Humber RiverBolton Core540,80781,121150Caledon / King
22Rouge RiverUnionville1,241,626186,244139Markham
23Humber RiverLake Wilcox364,83254,725137Richmond Hill
24Frenchman's BayBay Ridges307,68246,152130Pickering
25Don RiverKeele Industrial15,461,4262,319,214123Vaughan
26Humber RiverWoodbridge246,76937,015112Vaughan
218
TABLE 1. FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND PRIORITIZATION
RankWatershedCluster 12 TotalMunicipality
Direct Average Indirect Average
Annual Flood Annual Flood
Flood Risk
Damages ($)Damages ($)
Score
27Rouge RiverSouth Unionville702,709105,406105Markham
28Rouge RiverOld Markham Village107,77116,166100Markham
29Don RiverWillowfield220,16133,02496Toronto
30Carruthers CreekLower Carruthers207,13531,07094Ajax
31Petticoat CreekRougemount198,19329,72992Pickering
32Mimico CreekSouth Mimico125,83118,87580Toronto
33Petticoat CreekAltona60,5809,08775Pickering
34Mimico CreekUpper South Mimico156,95923,54470Toronto
35Don RiverHoggs Hollow106,51515,97762Toronto
36Duffins CreekStouffville Center59,8118,97253Whitchurch-Stouffville
37Etobicoke CreekLong Branch46,8157,02246Toronto
38Humber RiverAlbion Road22,3273,34946Toronto
39Mimico CreekDundas West38,2165,73245Toronto
40Mimico CreekMalton21,4353,21545Mississauga
41Don RiverLangstaff0036Vaughan
42Rouge RiverBrownÔs Corner0024Markham
1
Direct flooding impacts consist of damage to buildings and stru
2
Indirect damages refer to damages due arising as a result of lo, closure of community facilities, and loss of
income and other consequences arising from a disruption to normale.
219
Attachment 3
220
Attachment 4
___________________________________
221
RES.#A89/13 -FRENCHMAN'S BAY - PICKERING ROUGE CANOE CLUB
Licence Agreement Extension, CFN 26339. To extend the temporary
licence agreement with the Pickering Rouge Canoe Club for the ex
location on the west spit of Frenchman's Bay in the City of Pick
three years, renewable annually, commencing November 1, 2012.
Moved by:Dave Ryan
Seconded by:Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT the request to extend the temporary licence agreement with
Canoe Club for a paddling facility on Frenchman's Bay for three
annually, commencing November 1, 2012, be approved, subject to c
to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff and so
THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever acti
implement the license agreement extension, including obtaining a
and signing and execution of documents;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Pickering and Pickering Harbour Com
advised by the CEO's Office.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Since April 1994, the Pickering Rouge Canoe Club (PRCC), formall
Club, has operated a paddling facility on the west spit of Frenc
TRCA (page 5 of Attachment 1). The facility consists of two trai
storage of canoes and kayaks, and a parking area for three to fi
extensions have continued to be approved by TRCA and Pickering C
At Authority Meeting #6/10, held on July 23, 2010, Resolution #A129/10 was approved as
follows:
THAT the request to extend the temporary licence agreement with
Canoe Club for a paddling facility on Frenchman's Bay for three years, renewable
annually, commencing November 1, 2009, be approved, subject to conditions
satisfactory to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff and solicitor;
THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever acti
implement the license agreement extension, including obtaining any necessary
approvals and signing and execution of documents;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Pickering and Pickering Harbour Comp
advised by the CAO's Office.
On September 11, 2012, TRCA received a request from the Pickerin
extend this temporary licence agreement for the next three years
notified City of Pickering of the lease extension request. On Ma
Development Committee, the City of Pickering staff report (Repor
recommended for approval at City of Pickering Council Meeting to
(Attachment 1).
222
RATIONALE
Further to the updated Frenchman's Bay Waterfront Master Plan (2
consistent with appropriate water-based recreational activities
identifies the location of a permanent PRCC facility approximate
current temporary location. The new facility would support boat
washrooms, equipment storage and change rooms. The location of t
facility does not interfere with the ongoing harbour entrance re
implementation of the proposed Frenchman's Bay Waterfront Master
facility can be established, the licence agreement provides recr
programming by the Pickering Rouge Canoe Club without disruption
Pickering Harbour company will be notified of the licence agreem
the abutting bed of Frenchman's Bay.
Staff, upon approval by the Authority, will prepare and execute
extension of the licence agreement on an annual basis, commencin
1, 2012 to October 31, 2013.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Pickering Rouge Canoe Club will pay a rental rate of $500 for th
for the remaining two years of the extension the rental rate wil
PRCC will continue to cover the costs of one portable toilet wit
of club members, and any additional costs deemed appropriate to
for the site area.
Report prepared by: Connie Pinto, extension 5387
Emails: cpinto@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Connie Pinto, extension 5387
Emails: cpinto@trca.on.ca
Date: May 07, 2013
Attachments: 1
223
Attachment 1
224
225
226
227
228
229
___________________________________
230
RES.#A90/13 -BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE ARTIFACTS
Deaccession. Deaccession of 35 artifacts that are superfluous to
needs of Black Creek Pioneer Village.
Moved by:Dave Ryan
Seconded by:Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be a
deaccession two agricultural tools - a barley fork and a seed-so
been on long-term loan to the Peel Art Gallery, Museum, and Arch
THAT staff be authorized to deaccession one item, a piano, to a
institution;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to deaccession by auction:
9beds or parts hereof
2bookcases
1cabinet
2chests of drawers
1cradle
6cupboards
3desks
1bench
1shelf
3sideboards
2tables
1wash-hand stand.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #3/01, held on April 27, 2001, Resolution #A53/01 approved Black Creek
Pioneer Village (BCPV) Collections Policy which contains policy
the formal process of removing accessioned artifacts from the pe
The Collections Policy specifies the scope and extent of collect
artifacts; and the methods by which artifacts will be acquired,
the authority to dispose of artifacts in accordance with ethical
Collections Policy enables Black Creek Pioneer Village to collec
where deemed necessary. The policies and procedures for this de
followed by professional museum associations and peer institutio
from the sale of deaccessioned objects should be used in collect
Black Creek Pioneer Village collections have been acquired since
evolved. Lack of sufficient storage space has been a major prob
decades. The addition of the storage facility in the Visitors'
needed ÑcleanÒ storage for the most fragile artifacts, but did n
storage for a lot of the collection, particularly large items, w
barns and wet basements.
231
Since 1985, staff has severely limited active collecting. Staff
assessment of the condition and scope of the current collection.
gradually identifying artifacts that clearly do not fit within t
Collections Policy or are multiple duplicates. In these cases,
accepted museum practice is considered the most effective use of
the same time ensuring that the reputation of TRCA and Black Cre
harmed.
RATIONALE
Artifacts on Long-Term Loan to other Institutions:
BCPV has had two 19th century wooden agricultural tools, a barle
basket, on continuous loan to the Peel Art Gallery, Museum, and
Museum and Art Gallery) since 1968 (the barley fork is used for
the basket, for holding seeds when being planted). For this enti
need to recall either of these items for its own use. A request has been received from the Peel
Art Gallery, Museum, and Archives (solicited) to transfer ownersh
currently displaying and using these artifacts. Doing so would p
of these artifacts to an institution that is actively exhibiting
collection duplicate artifacts; and free BCPV staff from expendi
inventory these artifacts periodically, renew loan agreements, a
an on-going task.
Artifact to be deaccessioned to a more appropriate institution:
In 1983 Black Creek Pioneer Village acquired an upright piano, m
Organ and Piano Company of Bowmanville, ON, and dating to 1902+-
date of 1902 08 23). Since 1988, this piano has been on display
the Visitors' Centre at the Village. Recently, the Food Service
be removed in order to give more flexibility in meeting the dive
Village has no space in which to store this piano and that the p
date of the Village by thirty-five years necessitates staff's re
deaccession this piano to another institution. The Canadian Pia
Ontario, has requested that this piano be deaccessioned to them,
Items to be Deaccessioned by Auction:
With the aid of experts knowledgeable in the assessment and dati
been cataloguing and dating items in storage with a view to iden
the collecting period of the Village, are in such poor condition
and are in a condition that is beyond the financial resources of
are additional duplicates to ones of which the Village already h
intention of this on-going work to submit periodically lists of
permission to deaccession. This latest submission consists of:
9beds, or parts thereof. Four beds are incomplete (i.e., missin
been altered. Moreover, all bedrooms in Village buildings are a
beds;
2bookcases. One bookcase is missing its bottom half; the other
th
1cabinet. Back is badly warped. The use of plywood in its cons
century date;
232
2chests of drawers. One is in poor condition; the other is late.
chests of drawers in its collection;
1cradle. Late (donor dates to after 1887). Black Creek has a nu
collection;
6cupboards. All are in damaged condition. Moreover, one cupboard is very lar
6' wide), too large for most of the restored rooms in the Villag
3desks. One has been cut down; one is missing its drawer; the o
1settle (bench). Condition: separated into two parts; missing h
stripped. Ï Duplicates: others, in better condition, in the coll
1shelf bracket. Late (1890s to 1910s);
3sideboards. Two are in poor condition (would require refinishin
the other, is too large for exhibit in most restored rooms in th
others, in better condition, in the collection;
2tables. One would require complete refinishing for its use; ot
I). Ï Duplicates: the Village has many tables in its collection
1wash-hand stand. Condition: loose boards; original finish has
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Artifacts on Long-Term Loan to other Institutions:
No financial compensation will be received for the transfer of t
will benefit financially in that staff costs for periodically ch
be incurred.
Artifact to be deaccessioned to a more appropriate institution:
TRCA will not receive any compensation for the transfer of this
Museum will, however, cover the costs of transportation of the p
Napanee, estimated to be about $500.00.
Items to be Deaccessioned by Auction:
Staff recommend that these 32 pieces be deaccessioned by auction
Doing so, particularly in the case of the larger pieces of furni
storage space. Museums generally deaccession through auction, wi
into the collections program. Consistent with BCPV's Collection
deaccessioning of these 32 items will be applied towards collect
Priorities in this area are: 1) the purchase a chest freezer for
in-coming textile pieces as they come into the collection; 2) im
space in the VisitorsÔ Centre; 3) the contracting of a textile c
Village's woven coverlet collection.
Report prepared by: Jim Hunter, extension 5423
Emails: jhunter@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Jennifer Harrington, extension 5408; Ji
Emails: jharrington@trca.on.ca; jhunter@trca.on.ca
Date: March 21, 2013
___________________________________
233
RES.#A91/13 -REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND
Rear of 146 Robirwin Street, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, CFN
Recommends that the TRCA-owned property located at the rear of 1
Robirwin Street, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, Rouge River wat
be retained for conservation purposes.
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Chris Fonseca
THAT the motion for deferral of item EX7.1 - Request for Disposa
Conservation Authority-owned Land, at the rear of 146 Robirwin S
CARRIED
___________________________________
RES.#A92/13 -REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
11220 Regional Road 27
1321362 Ontario Inc., CFN 37324. Receipt of a request from 13213
Ontario Inc. for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to re
conservation easement from a 0.85 hectares (2.10 acres) parcel o
in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, Humber Ri
watershed.
Moved by:Michael Di Biase
Seconded by:Chris Fonseca
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in r
from 1321362 Ontario Inc. to remove a conservation easement in f
land owned by 1321362 Ontario Inc. in the City of Vaughan;
AND WHEREAS it is in the best interests of TRCA in furthering it
Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with
in this instance;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA release the conservation
affecting a parcel of valley and valley buffer lands containing
more or less, said land being Part of Lot 29, Concession 9, City
Municipality of York;
THAT consideration for the removal of the conservation easement
$2.00 plus legal, survey and other costs incurred by TRCA;
THAT completion of the transaction be subject to the approval of
Resources in accordance with Section 2(4.3) of the Conservation
Chapter C.28, as amended;
234
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take t
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals
execution of documents.
CARRIED
___________________________________
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES.#A93/13 -SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by:Gloria Lindsay Luby
Seconded by:Glenn Mason
THAT Section II items EX8.1 - EX8.3, inclusive, contained in Exe
#3/13, held on , 2013, be received.
CARRIED
Section II Items EX8.1 - EX8.3, Inclusive
ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE
(Executive Res.#B49/13)
HVAC RETROFITS, DUCT CLEANING AND AIR QUALITY TESTING
(Executive Res.#B50/13)
220 GREYABBEY TRAIL & SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT ACCESS PLAN
(Executive Res.#B51/13)
___________________________________
SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
RES.#A94/13 -GREENING YOUR GROUNDS HOMEOWNERS GUIDE
Receipt of report and presentation on Greening Your Grounds.
Moved by:Jack Heath
Seconded by:Chris Fonseca
THAT Greening Your Grounds - A Homeowners Guide to Stormwater La
Projects be received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In November of 2009, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (
City of Brampton, the Community Environment Alliance and the Bra
Association submitted a collaborative funding proposal to the On
(OTF). This funding would allow the collaborative partners to p
environmental project to raise the awareness of stormwater manag
community.
235
Valleybrook is a densely populated community between Sandalwood
Brampton. It houses the main artery of the Etobicoke Creek, spa
kilometres, and provides water outfall (stormwater discharge int
residences. Each spring, the corridor is subject to extreme flo
spring melt. One of the factors adding to the extreme flooding e
water outfall from the residential properties in the area. Due t
eaves troughs, and hard driveway surfaces, most of the heavy rai
running over these properties, into the storm drains and directl
only is this exacerbating the flooding issue, it is also polluti
In March of 2010, the funding application to the Ontario Trilliu
for $238,600 over four years. The first two years of the projec
getting to know the community by inviting them out to the public
planting, nature walks, litter clean-ups, healthy yards workshop
storm drain marking program.
Through participant feedback received during the first two years
confirmed that the two biggest barriers to residents collecting
property were the knowledge and the cost. In the third year of
developed ÑGreening Your Grounds Ï A Homeowners Guide to Stormwa
Projects". The 55 page guide enables staff to address the knowl
the community members to rethink and rework the landscapes on th TRCA staff
applied for funding to assist landowners with the costs of imple
In 2012, TRCA received $22,000 through the Ministry of the Envir
Agreement (COA). This funding allowed TRCA to develop a ÑWater G
offer technical and financial assistance to residents within the
held a focus group session with residents to develop the program
door-to-door delivery of a promotional brochure.
Greening Your Grounds Ï A Homeowners Guide to Stormwater Landsca
introduced to the Brampton community through six workshops in th
workshops were designed as a series and enabled the residents to
as outlined in the guide. The final workshop provided the oppor
A total of 230 participants
consultation with landscapers, engineers and gardening experts.
attended the workshops and over 80% of the participants attendedA total
of 26 rain barrels were donated to homeowners along the Etobicok
gallons of rain water.
A number of
The guide was presented at the TRCA Management Team meeting held
TRCA staff expressed an interest in the document and identified
authorities, municipalities and industry representatives would p
utilizing it as well. TRCA staff would like to accommodate a br
and are exploring options for a web based and a print on demand
be made available for Authority Members at the May 24th meeting.
The forth and final year of the Ontario Trillium Funding is unde
th
final report in June of 2014. Deliverables for the 4 year include the continuation of community
events on public lands and engaging schools in school ground gre
continue to promote and distribute the Greening Your Grounds wor
for additional funding to expand the Garden Grant program.
236
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The writing and design of the Greening Your Grounds workbook was
the TRCA Stewardship staff and Marketing and Communications staf
Foundation allocated their funding towards the printing of the g
workshop and administration costs.
Report prepared by: Joanne Jeffery, extension 5638
Emails: jjeffery@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Joanne Jeffery, extension 5638
Emails: jjeffery@trca.on.ca
Date: May 06, 2013
___________________________________
RES.#A95/13 -FLOOD MANAGEMENT SERVICE
2012 Annual Report and 2013 Workplan. Annual update on the status of
the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Flood Management
Service and highlights of current initiatives.
Moved by:Mike Mattos
Seconded by:Mujeeb Khan
THAT the Flood Management Service (FMS) 2012 Annual Report and 2
received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Highlights of the 2012 Annual Report and 2013 Work Plan
2012 marked the second year of the Flood Management Service's ex
Infrastructure, Hydrometrics, Data Management and Flood Risk Man
one program within the Ecology Division. In 2011 the FMS focuse
planning. However, 2012 saw the initiation of many projects that
Conservation Authority (TRCA) for long term sustainability in fl
completion of several important projects.
The following provides highlights of TRCA's work in 2012 which i
Attachment 1, along with goals for the Flood Management Service fAttachment 2
speaks specifically to the components of the Flood Forecasting a
part of Flood Risk Management) and how they meet the requirement
"Provincial Flood Forecasting and Warning Implementation Guideli
Resources, August 2008. The GTA Flood Standards were adopted at Authority Me
held on June 27, 2003, by Resolution #A130/03. These standards were later adopted by the
Province. The delivery of the Flood Forecasting and Warning Prog
accordance with achieving the goals of the Natural Hazards Polic
Statement, section 3.1 of the Planning Act.
237
In 2012, a number of significant goals were realized and are hig
1.
After two relatively quiet years in 2010 and 2011, the weather of
elements of TRCAÔs Flood Forecasting and Warning Program. TRCA
Messages in total: three Water Safety Messages, six Flood Outloo
Watches and two Flood Warnings. One of the success stories comi
effective partnership that has been developed between TRCA and T
Through improved communications, understanding of each other's p
and collaboration on a "dashboard" to display flood information
Transportation's Command Centre, the agencies were able to succe
on the Bayview Extension and the Don Valley Parkway during sever
September.
2.After several years of development, the TRCA Flood Protection and
Strategy was completed. The Strategy provides a roadmap for TRC
to reduce risk to life and property by identifying and prioritiz
Strategy also provides guidance on potential remediation optionsA separate report that
provides more details on the Strategy is included in this month'
item.
3.
The Flood Infrastructure team produced a "Flood Infrastructure S
also included as a separate item on the agenda. This marks an i
creating a long-term capital asset management plan for TRCA's fl
The report identifies the risks associated with each structure,
maintenance/program requirements.
4.
Two major flood maintenance projects were completed: 1) Stouffvi
2) Phase 3 of the Yonge York Mills Channel clean-out (the latter
the Ministry of Natural Resources Water and Erosion Control Infr
5.Staff completed a transition plan that has allowed FMS to begin
TRCA's hydrometrics (gauging) network internally, bringing techn
This, along with the purchase of new state of the art monitoring
increased efficiency in terms of cost and in time.
6.Data management activities included the completion of the daily
Flood Event Documentation Database. In partnership with other G
modules are currently under development. In addition, historica
published to a web portal allowing for easy searching and sharin
was previously difficult to access.
7.As part of TRCA's ongoing emergency management training, the Risk Management te
conducted hands on drills with staff to test preparedness. Staf
partners (York Region, City of Toronto) with the planning and implementatio
emergency exercises as required under the Emergency Measures Act
participate in the City of Toronto's Office of Emergency Managem
regular trainer for City staff. In 2012, staff participated in E
events in both the City of Mississauga and York Region.
8.
A consultant was hired to advance the work on the Downtown Brampt
Feasibility Study. This work is one project that forms part of t
Etobicoke Creek Revitalization Study (the other project is the U
Study led by the City). At the end of 2012, Task 2 was completed (of four tasks). The
anticipated project completion date is fall 2013. In addition,
component of Brampton's Comprehensive Special Policy Area Update
Brampton's Official Plan and Growth Management Review.
238
Major goals for 2013 include:
1.
Continued advancement of flood forecasting and warning tools, an
flood warning operations (flood duty officer activities).
2.Major repairs to G. Ross Lord Dam (including replacement of the
upgrades) and Claireville Dam (replacement of windows and diesel
3.
Albion Hills Dam and Stouffville Dam studies to be completed and e
initiated.
4.Expansion of the real-time all season precipitation gauge networ
Caledon and Pickering).
5.
Improvements to data management systems to include: incorporatio
into data management programming, establish disaster recovery pl
warning/monitoring systems.
6.Staff to represent TRCA and the GTA Flood Forecasting and Warnin
Provincial Flood Forecasting and Warning Committee.
7.Hold the 5th annual "Floods Happen" Workshop to inform municipal
forecasting and warning operations and to strengthen partnership
8.Complete the Downtown Brampton Flood Protection Feasibility Stud
9.
Continue work to support municipal Special Policy Area (SPA) ame
development of flood mitigation projects as required (e.g., Cale
Mississauga, Markham).
10.Extend knowledge of emergency management procedures to other dep
TRCA by assisting with the development of emergency preparedness
facilities.
11.Implement the recommendations of the Flood Protection Strategy a
Infrastructure State of Repair reports.
Quick 2012 Weather Facts and the Impacts of "Superstorm Sandy"
As mentioned above, 2012 brought a few weather events that had fl
TRCA's jurisdiction, summarized as follows:
The winter of 2012 was very mild and dry, with little snow accum
spring freshet.
Precipitation amounts were very low from February to May, reachi
normal amounts in the month of March.
June, July, September and October recorded above average rainfal
3% to 97% higher than normal amounts). However, this was mainly
thunderstorms that brought short duration and high intensity rai
November was unusually dry and only received 10 mm of rainfall f
Toronto Pearson Airport (only 15% of normal amounts and the drie
239
During the last few days of October 2012, Hurricane Sandy was se
Hurricane Hazel in 1954. The storms tracks were eerily similar,
storm was forecasted for the area due to a low pressure system o
weekend. Fortunately, southern Ontario received much less rainfa
For comparison, Hurricane Hazel released 285 mm of rain over 48
rain falling within 12 hours). Hurricane Sandy, was downgraded
(a "Superstorm"), and by Sunday evening (October 28th) it was no
than 100 mm (maximum) in our area over 3-4 days. This amount of
of time does not typically pose a threat of flooding in the TRCA
saturated ground conditions and the potential for thunderstorm a
Messages during the event.
Superstorm Sandy hit land on the afternoon of October 29th, cove
kilometres (with a 1,600 km diameter, stretching from the easter
Ontario).
Sandy brought multiple weather elements including wind, rain, su
surges were recorded in New York City).
Estimated damages were over $50 billion.
Southern Ontario experienced wind gusts from 80-90 km/hr (strong
to 100 km/hr).
Two fatalities were attributed to the strong winds in Ontario.
Many agencies, including TRCA opened their emergency operations
TRCA received numerous media requests for information and interv
and radio, including CBC Radio's Metro Morning).
Overall, Sandy did not result in flooding issues within TRCA's j
an extremely valuable test for the FMS communications and operat
deficiencies in TRCA's Emergency Operations Centre were identifi
2013 through a re-organization of workspace and upgrades to equi
learned that the "no news is good news" approach does not apply
media, and that we need to ensure that TRCA has capacity to deal
inquiries even when we do not necessarily have local flood conce
addressed in the 2013 workplan (Attachment 2).
Future Work for the Flood Management Service (2014 and Beyond)
The Provincial Flood Forecasting and Warning Implementation Guid
Resources, August 2008) provides a framework for the typical activities that
Management Service should undertake to achieve the goal of minim
property due to flooding. Although this report speaks primarily to the results achieved in
and the workplan for 2013, planning for future years has already
TRCA follows the best practices outlined in the Provincial Guide
following the roadmaps laid out in two additional reports presen
Infrastructure State of Repair and 2) Flood Protection and Remed
Future workplans will build upon the direction of these two stud
240
Currently, FMS receives adequate funding to manage all programs
requests. With this level of funding routine maintenance activi
are being completed, as well as studies to understand flood risk
mitigate the risks. However, over the next few years as recomme
Repair and Flood Protection Strategy are undertaken, more funds
works would no longer fall under "routine maintenance" but could
renovations" or "construction of new infrastructure". They woul
modifying or repairing concrete lined channels, major repairs to
floodproofing structures, removal of dams, etc.) and it is antic
avenues will need to be pursued, including provincial and/or fed
and special budget requests to local municipalities and regions.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds have been identified in the 2013 Operating Budget from TRC
partners (account 115-60 and 108-01) for general program operati
for 2013 are identified within the Toronto, Peel, York and Durham budgets to undertake the
project activities identified in the 2013 work plan.
Report prepared by: Laurian Farrell, extension 5601
Emails: lfarrell@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Laurian Farrell, extension 5601
Emails: lfarrell@trca.on.ca
Date: February 27, 2013
Attachments: 2
241
Attachment 1
TRCA Flood Management Service 2012/2013
Flood Management Service Overview
TRCAÔs flood management service (FMS) involves Risk Management,
Hydrometrics and Flood Infrastructure
Work Completed in 2012Work Proposed for 2013
Flood Risk Planning and Administration of TRCAÔs Flood Ongoing Planning and Administration of
Management Forecasting and Warning Program (full details TRCAÔs Flood Forecasting and Warning
provided in separate table below, Section 1)Program (full details provided in separate
Operation of the Flood Forecasting and Warning table below, Section 1)
Program (flood duty officers on call 24 hours/day,
Ongoing Operation of the Flood Forecasting
365 days/year)and Warning Program (full details provided in
Ongoing updates to TRCAÔs Flood Vulnerable Area separate table below, Section 2)
DatabaseOngoing updates to TRCAÔs Flood Vulnerable
Area Database
Initiation of the Flood Protection and Remedial
Capital Works StrategyFlood vulnerable cluster assessment,
Project management of flood risk reduction projects characterization, and prioritization for remedial
(e.g., Downtown Brampton, Yonge/York Mills works
Channel)
Remedial works will be undertaken in 2013
Ongoing work with the Municipal Outreach Programand subsequent years contingent upon
Further development of TRCAÔs outreach program funding and confirmation of priority rankings
and corporate identity/imaging for the FMSof vulnerable areas
Disseminate new regulation information (e.g.,
updated floodlines) to our municipal partners
and the public in coordination with TRCA
Development Services Staff and the Generic
Regulation Public Information process
Expand Municipal & Public Outreach to
include new partners
Flood Completed inspections on all structuresAnnual field inspection for all flood control
facilities to be completed
InfrastructureCompleted Phase 3 Channel Maintenance at
onge/ork MillsG. Ross Lord Dam back-up generator to be
YY
Completed G. Ross Lord Dam Safety Review Draft replaced
Report Yonge/York Mills Channel Phase IV
Maintenance Project to be completed
Stouffville Channel Maintenance completed and
original capacity restoredClaireville DamÔs diesel tanks to be replaced
Albion Hills Dam bridge assessment project to
be completed
Stouffville Dam DSR to be completed
Operation, Maintenance and Surveillance
Manuals to be updated for all dams
Emergency Preparedness Plans to be
updated for all dams
G. Ross Lord Dam gate motor upgrades to be
completed
TRAINING:
Advanced confined space training for rescue
entry at G. Ross Lord Dam
Swiftwater Rescue Training Level 1
Hydrometric/Open Channel Flow Monitoring
course
Aquarius Software training
Advanced dam inspection courses
Canadian Dam Association Conference
242
TRCA Flood Management Service 2012/2013
Flood Management Service Overview
TRCAÔs flood management service (FMS) involves Risk Management,
Hydrometrics and Flood Infrastructure
Work Completed in 2012Work Proposed for 2013
Hydrometric Continued to maintain and operate the 5 FMS Continue to maintain and operate the five FMS
Networkshydrometric networkshydrometric networks; stream flow,
Completed the 4th year operations of the Toronto precipitation, meteorological, baseflow,
Wet Weather Flow Network (under a modified snowcourse (>150 stations)
monitoring protocol and a focus on a discrete
Implement 5th year operations of the Toronto
baseline data analysis) Wet Weather Flow Network with a modified
Implemented the 2012 Ontario Hydrometrics Services monitoring protocol under the
Transition Planrecommendations/results of the 2013 baseline
report being prepared by FMS staff
Installed new Water Survey Canada stream gauge on
Duffins CreekInstallation of a second water quality/quantity
Continued to expand and streamline TRCAÔs monitoring station for the Town of Ajax
hydrometrics networks. Including: Provide technical advice and coordinate the
1.installation of the Seaton Lands ground water,
Acquisition of an acoustic Doppler current profiler
for measuring high flow safely and more efficientlyprecipitation, and flow monitoring equipment
2.Equipment upgrades to the stream flow network in Installation of four season real-time
order to standardize/simplify field operations and precipitation gauge in Richmond Hill
data processing initiatives
Installation of four season real-time
Installed four new real-time stream gauges for Credit precipitation gauge in Etobicoke or Mimico
Valley Conservation on the Credit Riverwatershed (proposed)
Installed a new water quality/quantity monitoring Installation of two new stream gauges at the
station for the Town of Ajaxmouth of the Rouge River watershed
Completed compliance turbidity monitoring of the Continue to expand and streamline TRCAÔs
West Don River sediment removal project (HogÔs hydrometrics networks. Including:
Hollow)1.The acquisition of Aquarius hydrometrics
software for data management and QA/QC
Completed the Duffins Creek wet weather flow
pathogens tracking study for the MOE and TRCAinitiatives
Continued to provide technical expertise and support 2.The acquisition of a Sontek Flow Tracker
to various government, non-government, industry, flow meter for faster metering turn-around
and educational institutions
Expand program deliverables by the
Development of course outline for TRCA lead 2013 acquisition of Hydro Surveyor software
hydrometrics training (for external clients, in (Allows the operator to use River Surveyor to
progress)conduct bathymetric surveys of standing
water e.g. storm pond surveys for sediment
accumulation)
Continue to provide technical expertise and
support to various government,
non-government, industry, and educational
institutions
243
TRCA Flood Management Service 2012/2013
Flood Management Service Overview
TRCAÔs flood management service (FMS) involves Risk Management,
Hydrometrics and Flood Infrastructure
Work Completed in 2012Work Proposed for 2013
Data Improvements to ÑToronto DashboardÒ (ongoing) Create new decision making tools for Flood
Management Completed the development of the GTA Flood Group Duty Officers on the TRCA Gauging website
Flood Event Documentation Database (beta version,
Develop a system to track Flood Control
currently being tested)Infrastructure inspections and to assist in
Published legacy hydrometrics data to a web-based asset management
data portalIncorporate the Aquarius software into data
QAQC and processing procedures
Improvements to redundancy in the Flood
Monitoring / Warning system
Implement disaster recovery plans for Flood
Monitoring / Warning system
Training
Flood and/or Stream related workshops
Ontario Low Water Response training
XConnect System training
VB.net training
Emergency Management training
Water quantity data reporting / analysis /
statistics / data visualization course (if
available)
244
Attachment 2
Flood Forecasting & Warning Program
Section 1: Planning and Administration
To develop and maintain an administrative framework to facilitat
and warning.
MNR Work Completed in 2012Work Proposed for 2013
Implementation
Guideline
Component
Maintain Adequate
Flood Plain Mapping
in Accordance with
FDRP Technical
Standards
Ongoing GTA Flood Group committee work to Complete development of the GTA Flood
Documentationdevelop a standardized Flood Event Group FED database
Documentation (FED)(beta version of database
complete)
Monitoring Network Maintained and operated TRCAÔs 5 hydrometric Ongoing planning, updating,
and Data Collection networksmaintenance and operation of TRCAÔs 5
SystemMaintained and operated TRCAÔs data hydrometric networks
management systemOngoing planning, updating,
maintenance and operation of TRCAÔs
data management system
Annual Training Modules were provided in 2012 Annual Training Modules to be provided
Training for staff, to staff as required; topics included:in 2013 to staff as required:
1.1.
partners and clientsDaily OperationsIntro to FDO duties
2.Dam Tours & Dam Operations2.Daily Operations, Structure,
3.Major Event OperationsContingency Plan
4.NexFlood 3.New FDO's Site Tours
5.4.
Traffic SafetyDam Operations, EPPs, Tour
6.First Aid Training5.Emergency Preparedness - BEM
7.Spills ResponseRefresher
8.River Watch6.IMS & Major Event Procedures
9.7.
Security and CommunicationsNexFlood
10.Real Time Gauging & Website Updates8.Logistics
11.Basic Emergency Management9.Crisis Communications, Spills Protocol
2 Exercises will be completed
Written drills and a functional drill were 3 Drills will include: communications, use
completed in 2012 as part of our ongoing of equipment, DPC
emergency management training
Document Historical Data collection of all hydrometric networks was Complete Flood Event Documentation
Flow Eventscompleted for all events Database and integrate its use into
Data collection through the NexFlood Radar data routine flood warning procedures
acquisition tool was initiated (Data collection in Continue routine data collection (over
2013 and beyond will require programming 5,000 measurements per day) and data
modifications to NexFlood due to changes in management
Nexrad radar architecture)Continue data collection through the
NexFlood Radar data acquisition tool
245
Flood Forecasting & Warning Program
Section 1: Planning and Administration
To develop and maintain an administrative framework to facilitat
and warning.
MNR Work Completed in 2012Work Proposed for 2013
Implementation
Guideline
Component
Develop and Maintain The NexFlood system has been expanded to Complete architectural revisions to
Flood Forecast include the Don watershedNexflood to accommodate changes in
ModelsThe watershed model has been completed and radar operations
calibrated, and will be used for operational
Maintain operational beta testing, and
purposes following Nexflood system revisions in provide training to staff on system use
2012Revise the DPC to ensure currency with
The Daily Planning Cycle (DPC) was utilized to most recent hydrologic model updates for
forecast the potential for flood eventsTRCA watersheds
Continue to use the DPC for
non-operational watershed flood
assessment
Procedures Contingency manual update included new flood Annual Contingency Plan update will be
Manuals/Flood terminology completed, including updates to
Contingency document
Complete update of FDO operations binder and
Operationscreation of CFDO operations binders Ongoing updates to FDO/CFDO
operations binders
Prepare for Monthly inspections of Claireville, G. Ross, Milne, Continue monthly inspection of Claireville,
Emergency and Stouffville Dams were conductedG. Ross, Milne, and Stouffville Dams
Operations
thth
4 Annual ÑFloods Happen Municipal WorkshopÒ Hold the 5 Annual ÑFloods Happen
Maintain and Improve
on flood forecasting and warning was held for Municipal WorkshopÒ for municipal
Liaison with
municipal staff in coordination with Halton partners in April 2013
Municipalities and
Region Conservation Authority (HRCA), Credit Municipal outreach program will be
Local Emergency
Valley Conservation (CVC) and Lake Simcoe extended to all interested
Response Groups
Region Conservation (LSRCA) in March 2012municipalities/divisions to improve
The workshop provided our shared communications and identify potential for
municipalities with information about our partnerships
respective program operationsContinue to work with the GTA Flood
Forecasting and Warning Group and the
Improved communications and created
partnerships, included presentations to Provincial Flood Forecasting and Warning
municipalities and external partnersGroup to deliver an effective flood
forecasting and warning program
Continue training partnerships with
Toronto OEM
Continue to assist with annual municipal
exercises to improve both FMS staff and
municipal staff procedures during flood
emergencies
246
Section 2: Operations
To understand and quantify the response and potential impacts wi
events
MNR Work Completed in 2012Work Proposed for 2013
Implementation
Guideline
Component
Follow Daily Planning Conducted on a daily basis with Ongoing on a daily basis with
Cycleimprovements/modifications as neededimprovements/modifications as needed
Define Watershed OngoingOngoing
Conditions
Communicate Flood 13 Flood Messages issued in 2012 including 3
Potential or Flood Water Safety messages, 6 Flood Outlook
Statusmessages, 2 Flood Watch messages and 2
Flood Warning messages
Maintain an Operation of the EOC at Head Office continued Continue to operate EOC at Head Office
Emergency with a focus on providing technologies for the and upgrade equipment as required
Operations CentreNexFlood system and on maintaining the Increase number of telephone and
Metronet Radio Systemcomputer terminals (with access to
networks).
Staff SafetyStaff training included traffic safety in 2012Ongoing as needed
Document Flood Completed for 2012Ongoing
Events
Support Internal and Continued implementation of municipal outreach Ongoing
External Clientscampaign
Continued work with TRCA Development
Planning
On-going involvement in municipal emergency
exercises
Effective Completed as needed; e.g. during/post Ongoing
Communication Hurricane Sandy
(Debriefs)
Establish Internal and Continue enhancements to the Flood Ongoing
Forecasting & Warning Centre pages on TRCAÔs
External
Communications corporate website, including a web-based
Protocolsystem for identifying flood susceptible areas
Continued weekly checks of the Metronet
backup radio system with Toronto Police
Continue to provide information and advice to
municipal clients with targeted
meetings/presentations, and exercise
collaboration (Municipal Outreach Program)
Continued development of targeted marketing
materials
Disseminate new regulation information (e.g.,
updated floodlines) to our municipal partners
and the public in coordination with TRCA
Development Services Staff and the Generic
Regulation Public Information process
___________________________________
247
RES.#A96/13 -WATERSHED COMMITTEE MINUTES
Moved by:Ben Cachola
Seconded by:Mike Mattos
THAT Section IV item EX8.3 - Watershed Committee Minutes, be rec
CARRIED
Section IV Item EX8.3
HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE
Minutes of Meeting #1/13, held on April 16, 2013
___________________________________
ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
RES.#A97/13 -ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
Moved by:Richard Whitehead
Seconded by:Linda Pabst
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06 items EX10.1 - EX10.115, containe
Committee Minutes #3/13, held on
, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
___________________________________
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:17 a.m.., on Friday, May
Gerri Lynn O'ConnorBrian Denney
ChairSecretary-Treasurer
/ks
248
Toronto and Region
Conservation
Authority
MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY#5/13
June 21, 2013
The Authority Meeting #5/13, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village,
on Friday, June 21, 2013. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at
9:38 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Vice Chair
David Barrow Member
Ben Cachola Member
Bob Callahan Member
Raymond Cho Member
Ronald Chopowick Member
Vincent Crisanti Member
Glenn De Baeremaeker Member
Chris Fonseca Member
Jack Heath Member
Mujeeb Khan Member
Gloria Lindsay Luby Member
Mike Mattos Member
Peter Milczyn Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair
Linda Pabst Member
John Parker Member
Anthony Perruzza Member
Dave Ryan Member
Deb Schulte Member
John Sprovieri Member
Cynthia Thorburn Member
Richard Whitehead Member
ABSENT
Paul Ainslie Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Colleen Jordan Member
Glenn Mason Member
Jim Tovey Member
249
RES.#A98/13 - MINUTES
Moved by: Linda Pabst
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #4/13, held on May 24, 2013, be approved.
CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#A99/13 - URBAN FOREST STUDIES UPDATE
Update on urban forest activities and receiving of finalized reports for
York Region and City of Pickering studies.
Moved by: John Sprovieri
Seconded by: John Parker
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff has completed urban
forest studies in partnership with the regional municipalities of Peel and York, the cities of
Mississauga, Brampton, Vaughan, Markham and Pickering, and the towns of Caledon,
Richmond Hill and Ajax;
AND WHEREAS staff has presented urban forest study results to Councils and
environmental advisory committees (EACs) from participating municipalities;
AND WHEREAS the York Region and City of Pickering reports were finalized in 2012;
AND WHEREAS staff continues to work on follow-up research and communication
initiatives with partner municipalities (e.g. Peel Urban Forest Working Group, York
Region's Forestry Department, Mississauga's Natural Heritage and Urban Forest Strategy,
and Brampton's Natural Heritage and Environmental Management Strategy);
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the York Region Urban Forest Summary Report
(Attachment 1) be received;
THAT the City of Pickering Urban Forest Study Report (Attachment 2) be received;
THAT the Region of York and City of Pickering by so advised by the CEO's Office;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to provide future updates to the Authority on urban
forest initiatives and strategy implementation as part of annual Forest Health Reports to
the Authority.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The urban forest includes all trees, shrubs and understory plants, as well as the soils that
sustain them, ranging from individual street trees to wooded areas, on both public and private
lands.
250
One of the recommendations in the TRCA Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy (2007),
was for TRCA to engage in the study and development of strategies for urban forest
management across the TRCA jurisdiction. Many of TRCA's partner municipalities had taken the
initiative to begin urban forest studies and TRCA was asked to undertake and manage the
projects on their behalf. Technical working groups made up of municipal and conservation
authorities staff were formed to direct the work. An informal collaborative of stakeholders
(including municipalities, conservation authorities, and relevant ENGOs and academics) was
also formed to discuss standardization across the GTA in order to facilitate comparisons
between municipalities; the development of complementary strategies; and ultimately the
creation of a comprehensive regional report. The latter would be a compilation state and
function of the urban forest in the GTA (TRCA and Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) watershed
municipalities) as well as recommendations for action at multiple scales from the local
landowner, to municipalities and conservation authorities, to the provincial and federal
government.
The objectives of the urban forest studies were:
1) To quantify the existing distribution, structure (composition, condition, etc.) and function of
the urban forest (its contribution to human wellbeing), based on both ground level plot data
(i-Tree Eco model) and satellite imagery (UTC analysis or photo interpretation). The analysis
was provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service and the
University of Vermont's spatial analysis lab.
2) To provide a baseline for future monitoring. Recommendations were made in the studies for
future management and monitoring cycles. All sample plots are set up in a manner that
allows revisiting their exact location and thus permits long-term monitoring.
3) To outline the preliminary actions needed to enhance the capacity of the urban forest in the
study area to provide essential ecosystem services.
The study findings are used as the basis for developing urban forest management plans and
policies that would support healthy and sustainable communities. The goal is twofold, to
address crisis situations, such as the current threat of emerald ash borer to ash tree species
(Fraxinus) in all TRCA watersheds, while undertaking long-term, ongoing management to build
resilience to potential future risks.
Starting in 2008, TRCA has managed urban forest studies for the Region of Peel (including City
of Mississauga, City of Brampton and Town of Caledon), Town of Ajax, Region of York
(including City of Vaughan, and towns of Markham and Richmond Hill) and City of Pickering, as
well as sitting on the City of Toronto's steering committee for their urban forest study in 2009
(Toronto released their finalized strategy in January 2013).
At Authority Meeting #10/11, held on November 25, 2011, Resolution #A241/11 was approved,
in part, as follows:
THAT staff be authorized to participate in urban forest related opportunities and initiatives
locally and beyond, sharing staff experience and expertise;
251
THAT staff pursue support from urban forest study partners for the development of a
compilation report of urban forest studies conducted to date in the Toronto region
(specifically York, Peel, Toronto, Ajax and Pickering);
...AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Authority on progress on completing and
implementing the urban forest strategies.
This report is provided to the Authority as an update on progress for urban forest studies
completion and implementation, and to provide the completed York Region and Pickering
study reports to be received.
2013 Updates
The urban forest study for the Town of Ajax was completed in 2009; the studies for the City of
Mississauga, City of Brampton and Town of Caledon in 2011. Technical Report was provided
as well as an umbrella document entitled Region of Peel Urban Forest Strategy. These were
received by the Authority in 2011.
The studies for the City of Vaughan, City of Markham and Town of Richmond Hill in York
Region, as well as for the City of Pickering, were completed in 2012. The resulting Technical
Reports for Pickering, Markham, Vaughan and Richmond Hill, as well as an umbrella
document entitled York Region Urban Forest Study Summary Report 2012, were submitted and
presentations made to councils. (A section on these reports follows this 2013 update.)
The next step for those area municipalities is to develop urban forest management plans that
will provide details for managing the urban forest locally. Staff is available to municipalities to
assist in the development of such plans as appropriate. The Town of Ajax prepared a plan in
2010; TRCA staff assisted in its review. The City of Mississauga is currently developing an
urban forest management plan that currently forms a significant component of the City of
Mississauga's Natural Heritage System and Urban Forest Strategy, currently in draft. TRCA staff
is on the Core Working Team for that Strategy's development.
TRCA staff has been involved in some important urban forest projects since the completion of
those studies, as follows:
• Region of Peel: TRCA staff members sit on the Peel Urban Forest Working Group that is
currently determining a target for urban forest canopy cover for Peel. The group has
also begun developing a methodology for prioritizing planting areas according to
various social and environmental factors.
• York Region: TRCA is developing a communication piece, in part using the findings from
the urban forest studies, to engage various York Region audiences to take part in
growing and maintaining the urban forest. TRCA is also developing an approach to
assist York Region in encouraging the remaining municipalities that have not yet
conducted urban forest studies. The intent is to achieve complete coverage of York
Region's urban forest. A third project involves writing Terms of Reference for a
consultant to develop a York Region Urban Forest Management Plan.
252
• Town of Aurora: In March 2013, TRCA was informed that Town of Aurora had agreed to
undertake their own urban forest in partnership with York Region. Although only a small
portion of Aurora is within TRCA's jurisdiction, the majority being in Lake Simcoe and
Region Conservation Authority's (LSRCA) jurisdiction, TRCA will be managing the
project because of the expertise that staff has in conducting urban forest studies for
York Region. Staff will explore skills transfer with LSRCA for future studies.
• Trees for Life: TRCA is a member of the Trees for Life Coalition to raise awareness,
funding and motivation to double the existing tree canopy in the Toronto region. Efforts
are directed specifically at implementation on the ground. TRCA has contributed
information and expertise gained from the urban forest studies conducted in the region.
• Compilation Report: Staff is planning to reconvene the informal collaborative formed at
the onset of the studies to discuss the next steps for urban forestry in the broader
Toronto region. One purpose will be to scope out a compilation report that would
present the state of the urban forest in the region. Some of the benefits of that will be the
potential to obtain attention from senior governments on urban forests (for example,
contributing to Green Infrastructure Ontario - see below), to identify economies of scale
and to provide a catalyst for improving best practices and monitoring approaches.
A number of other opportunities are presenting themselves for expanding the discussion on
urban forest management and inserting it into work that is not traditionally considered
conservation.
• GIO Coalition: TRCA is a founding member of the Green Infrastructure Ontario (GIO)
Coalition. The regional urban forest compilation report may contribute to GIO's message
urging the Province to generate policies and budgets that reflect the value of trees as
infrastructure. An important outcome would be for a wide range of provincial ministries
to provide support to municipalities in the implementation of urban forest management
plans for the achievement of multiple social, environmental and economic objectives.
• Ecohealth Group: Conservation authorities (TRCA, CVC), public health units (Peel, York,
Toronto and Simcoe-Muskoka), Public Health Ontario, York Region Forestry and the
David Suzuki Foundation have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to
collaborate in raising awareness of synergies between the conservation and human
health mandates. The first task is to show senior public health officials evidence that
their engagement in promoting nature will result in healthier people and lower health
care costs.
• Peel Air Quality: TRCA is a participant on the Peel Air Quality and Health Outreach and
Education Partnership that has formed to encourage action toward improving air quality
in Peel. The urban forest in Peel has been discussed as a key means of lowering urban
heat effect, increasing pollution removal and promoting active lifestyles, all of which are
beneficial to respiratory health.
253
• Biodiversity Research: Considerable data was collected from the 2,000 urban forest
study plots set up across the TRCA municipalities. Detailed research on the correlation
between urban forest structure, human wellbeing, built form and species distribution
can be useful for making decisions in regional and urban planning. Findings can assist
TRCA and partners in messaging the value of the urban forest to human quality of life
and in defining the role of biodiversity in The Living City region.
Urban Forest Reports
The York Region Urban Forest Study Summary Report 2012 was submitted by TRCA to York
Region in 2012. It summarizes the findings from the Technical Reports that were written for the
municipalities of Markham, Vaughan and Richmond Hill, which include the following:
• Total urban forest cover in Richmond Hill is 25%, in Markham 18% and in Vaughan 17%.
• Lowest urban forest cover is associated with commercial and industrial land uses.
• Greatest potential by total surface area for increasing urban forest is in existing low density
residential areas (aside from future development lands).
• Less than 4% of all trees are mature while 70% are in smallest size class.
The existing urban forest in all three municipalities contributes to promoting healthy
communities and economy through carbon sequestration ($665,000 annually) and storage
($17,000,000), and air pollution removal (7,200,000 annually). These values represent only a
selected few of the multiple benefits of the urban forest. A greater percent cover and a more
mature urban forest will deliver exponentially greater benefits.
The executive summary of the York Region Urban Forest Study Summary Report is found in
Attachment 1. The full report is available from staff upon request.
The City of Pickering Urban Forest Technical Report was submitted by TRCA to the City in 2012.
It provided the findings for the study area (the urban and urbanizing portions of the
municipality), including the following:
• Total urban forest cover 26% (including 6% shrub cover).
• 24% of all trees are located in vacant lands
• Less than 5% of all trees are mature while 48% are in smallest size class.
In consultation with Pickering staff, 27 recommendations were provided in the report, including
the recommendation to conduct an urban tree canopy analysis to help determine where to
increase tree cover.
The executive summary of the City of Pickering Urban Forest Technical Report is found in
Attachment 2. The full report is available from staff upon request.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
1. Staff will continue to participate in and support urban forest projects in Peel and York
regions, as well as contribute to the Trees for Life initiative.
2. A workshop will be organized with the regional urban forest collaborative to determine what
are the next steps to be taken and coordinated such as the scoping of an urban forest
compilation report for the Toronto region.
254
3. Staff will inform the Authority on the progress of the implementation of urban forest
strategies and recommendations from urban forest studies. TRCA has been involved in
urban forest work for over five years and as we continue it will be important to look back at
the sum of all of the work in partnerships over the years. Future updates on the urban forest
and on ongoing initiatives will be provided to the Authority as a component of annual Forest
Health Reports to the Authority.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for the participation in urban forest initiatives, in the implementation of the Peel
Strategy, and in the initial steps of the compilation report will be derived from the Terrestrial
Natural Heritage account supported by the capital contributions from the City of Toronto and
regions of Peel, York and Durham. York Region has provided just under$50,000 to TRCA for
the projects described above. York Region and the Town of Aurora have together contributed
$120,000 to TRCA for the Aurora urban forest study (the iTree model is now available online;
therefore, TRCA staff will perform the analysis without need of a contract with USDA).
Report prepared by: Lionel Normand, extension 5327
Emails: Inormand @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Lionel Normand, extension 5327
Emails: Inormand @trca.on.ca
Date: June 3, 2013
Attachments: 2
255
Attachment 1 -York Region Urban Forest Study Summary Report (excerpted executive
summary)
The York Region Urban Forest Study has been prepared in partnership by the Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), York Region, City of Vaughan, Town of Richmond Hill
and Town of Markham. These partners have provided funding, as well as expertise and
direction through their involvement in a technical working group. The purpose of the Summary
Report is to provide a summary of the current state of the urban forest.
York Region's Urban Forest Today
The results of the urban forest studies conducted in the municipalities of Vaughan, Richmond
Hill and Markham are summarized in this report at a regional scale. These studies utilized the
i-Tree software suite of tools offered by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Forest Service. The results of these studies are presented in detail in the technical reports
provided for each area municipality.
Urban Forest Distribution
The Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) digital cover assessment determined that Richmond Hill
currently supports the highest percent canopy cover (25 percent), followed by Markham (18
percent) and Vaughan (17 percent). The residential low land use category currently supports
the greatest proportion of the existing canopy cover in all three municipal study areas. Outside
of agricultural lands, the greatest opportunity to establish additional canopy cover in all three
municipal study areas is found in the residential low land use category. Across all study areas
canopy cover is low on commercial and industrial lands.
Urban Forest Structure
Common native species across the three municipalities include sugar maple (Acer saccharum),
eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), eastern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis), white ash
Fraxinus americana) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). Several invasive species are also
well established in these study areas, most notably European buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica),
exotic bush honeysuckle (Lonicera spp.) and Norway maple (Acer negundo).
The proportion of large mature trees is low across all study areas. Trees in the smallest
diameter class make up more than 70 percent of the total tree population in each study area,
while trees greater than 45.7 cm in diameter at breast height (dbh) represent less than 4
percent of the total tree population in each study area.
Urban Forest Function
Across Vaughan, Richmond Hill and Markham trees sequester approximately 29,000 tonnes of
carbon each year (valued at approximately$665,000 annually). The total amount of carbon
stored by trees in the three study areas is approximately 750,000 tonnes (valued at
$17,000,000).
256
Trees reduce the demand for heating and cooling in buildings by shading and cooling homes
during summer months and providing protection from cold winds in the winter. As a result, the
production of 8,100 tonnes of carbon emissions by power plants (associated with heating and
cooling) is avoided annually in Vaughan, Richmond Hill and Markham. The cumulative value of
energy savings across the three municipal study areas is over$5 million annually.
Trees and shrubs in the three municipal study areas improve local air quality by absorbing
gaseous pollutants or binding particulate to leaf and bark surfaces. Approximately 830 tonnes
of air pollution are removed each year by the urban forest in Vaughan, Richmond Hill and
Markham; the value of this service is approximately$7.2 million annually.
The i-Tree Hydro model simulated the effects of tree cover on stream flow in the West Don and
Upper Rouge subwatersheds. The model determined that a loss of existing canopy cover (27
percent) in the Upper Rouge subwatershed would increase total stream flow during the
simulation period by an average of 2.9 percent (173,000 m3). The same exercise conducted in
the West Don found that loss of existing canopy cover (11 percent) would increase total stream
flow by approximately 1.0 percent.
The results of the York Region Urban Forest Study provide an important foundation for the
development of urban forest management plans.
257
Attachment 2 - City of Pickering Urban Forest Study Technical Report (excerpted
executive summary)
The City of Pickering Urban Forest Study has been prepared by the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA), in partnership with the City of Pickering. The purpose of the
Study was to assess the structure and function of the urban forest, and to provide management
recommendations for enhancing the sustainability of both the urban forest resource and the
community as a whole. The study was conducted in the urban areas of the municipality, south
of the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) Line. The results will serve as a baseline for future
research and monitoring, and will equip managers with the knowledge necessary to manage
forest structure for the provision of desired ecosystem services, including climate change
mitigation and adaptation, air pollution removal, stormwater management, residential energy
savings, wildlife habitat, and community aesthetics.
Summary of Results
A suite of tools of analysis created by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station
were used to quantify the structure and function of the urban forest in the City of Pickering.
Tree Cover and Leaf Area:
The total canopy cover (trees and shrubs) in the Pickering study area is 26 percent. Tree cover
in Pickering is approximately 20 percent; shrub cover is approximately 6 percent. Pickering's
2
1,672,000 trees provide 68 km of total leaf area. The other land use category, which is
comprised largely of vacant land zoned for future development, supports both the highest
canopy cover (trees and shrubs) and the highest total leaf area (trees only). Plantable space is
also high in the other land use; however, competing interests for urban development on these
lands may limit opportunities to increase tree cover.
Tree and Shrub Cover by Land Use (expressed as a percent of total cover):
Other: 24 %
Agriculture: 22 %
Residential: 21 %
Natural Cover: 18 %
Institutional, Utilities and Transportation: 7 %
Commercial and Industrial: 6 %
Open Space: 2 %
Most Common Tree Species by Land Use (expressed as a percent of total leaf area):
Commercial + Industrial: Institutional + Utilities and Transportation:
• Eastern hemlock: 21 % • Red maple: 30 %
• Norway maple: 13 % • Manitoba maple: 12 %
• Eastern white pine: 9 % • Eastern white cedar: 10 %
Open Space + Natural Cover + Agriculture: Other:
• Sugar maple: 26 % • Eastern hemlock: 18 %
• Eastern hemlock: 13 % • Eastern white cedar: 12 %
• Eastern white cedar: 12 % • Sugar maple: 10 %
258
Residential (Low, medium and high density):
• Norway maple: 17 %
• Silver maple: 13 %
• Eastern white cedar: 7 %
Tree Size:
As urban trees increase in size, their environmental, social and economic benefits increase as
well. In Pickering a tree that is 72.5 cm in trunk diameter at breast height (dbh) stores 85 times
more carbon and 25 times more pollution than a tree that is 11 cm dbh. Approximately 48
percent of all trees in Pickering fall within the smallest diameter class and 75 percent of all trees
are less than 15.3 cm dbh. The proportion of large trees is low; less than five percent of the tree
population has a dbh of 38.2 cm or greater.
Structural Value of Trees in Pickering:
The estimated structural value of all trees in Pickering is approximately $627 million. This value
does not include the ecological or societal value of the forest, but rather it represents an
estimate of tree replacement costs and/or compensation due to tree owners for tree loss.
Carbon Storage and Sequestration:
As a tree grows, it removes, or sequesters, carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This carbon is
stored in the woody biomass of the tree. When a tree dies, much of the stored carbon is
released back to the atmosphere through decomposition. Trees in Pickering are estimated to
store 104,000 metric tonnes of carbon, with an associated value of$2.3 million. Annually, trees
in Pickering sequester approximately 4,200 metric tonnes of carbon, with an associated value
of$96,000.
Air Pollution Removal:
The urban forest can improve local air quality by intercepting and absorbing airborne
pollutants. Pickering's urban forest removes 91 metric tonnes of air pollution annually; this
ecosystem service is valued at$786,000.
• Ozone: 48 metric tonnes
• Particulate matter (10 microns) : 24 metric tonnes
• Nitrogen dioxide: 15 metric tonnes
• Sulfur dioxide: 3 metric tonnes
• Carbon monoxide: 1 metric tonne
Residential Energy Savings:
Trees reduce local air temperature due to the shading effects and the release of water vapor
through evapotranspiration. In Pickering the urban forest reduces the annual energy
consumption by approximately 85,600 MBTUS and 2,800 MWH, with an associated annual
financial savings of approximately $1 million. As a result of this reduced demand for heating
and cooling, the production of over 1,700 tonnes of carbon emissions is avoided annually
(associated annual savings of$38,100).
Stakeholder Consultation
In October 2011 TRCA and the City of Pickering held a workshop for stakeholders in urban
forest management in Pickering. The workshop achieved the following objectives.
259
To obtain feedback on the preliminary recommendations derived from the results of the
characterization of urban forest structure and function;
To develop a preliminary baseline assessment of the current state of urban forest
management in Pickering through the use of criteria and indicators; and,
To gain support for the implementation process to follow from this Study.
Recommendations
The following recommendations can assist in progressing towards many of the short and long
term objectives associated with the criteria and performance indicators for sustainable urban
forest management presented by Kenney et al. (2011). To fully evaluate the City's performance
for each of the 25 criteria is beyond the scope of this report. Through the development of a
management plan the City can more comprehensively explore the operational actions and
resources required to achieve success, and can evaluate and prioritize the recommendations
presented here.
Summary of Recommendations
1. Increase leaf area in canopied areas by planting suitable tree and shrub species under
existing tree cover. Planting efforts should be focused in areas where mature and aging
trees are over-represented. Neighbourhoods in these areas that maintain a high
proportion of ash species should be prioritized.
2. Conduct an Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) assessment of the municipal study area to
identify priority planting areas and set future tree cover targets.
3. Develop and implement an urban forest monitoring program that tracks trends in the
structure and distribution of the urban forest. The recommended monitoring scenario
consists of a land cover mapping assessment (UTC) at a five year interval and a
field-based assessment (i-Tree Eco) at a ten year interval.
4. Conduct an inventory of all municipally owned and managed trees. Update the
inventory at regular intervals.
5. Utilize the Pest Vulnerability Matrix during species selection for municipal tree and shrub
planting.
6. Establish a diverse tree population in which no species represents more than five
percent of the tree population, no genus represents more than 10 percent of the tree
population, and no family represents more than 20 percent of the intensively managed
tree population both city-wide and at the neighbourhood level.
7. In collaboration with TRCA, develop and implement an invasive species management
strategy that will comprehensively address existing and future threats posed by invasive
pests, diseases and plants.
8. Work with local growers to utilize native and genetically diverse planting stock grown
from locally adapted seed sources in both intensively and extensively managed areas.
260
9. Evaluate and develop the strategic steps required to increase the proportion of large,
mature trees in the urban forest. This can be achieved using a range of tools including
planning policy, by-law enforcement and public education. Where tree preservation
cannot be achieved, Official Plan policy should be considered to require compensation
for the loss of mature trees and associated ecosystem services.
10. Develop municipal guidelines and regulations for sustainable streetscape and
subdivision design that ensure adequate soil quality and quantity for tree establishment
and eliminate conflict between natural and grey infrastructure.
11. Apply and monitor the use of structural soils, subsurface cells and other enhanced
rooting environment techniques for street trees. Utilizing these technologies at selected
test-sites in the short-term may provide a cost-effective means of integrating these
systems into the municipal budget.
12. Reduce energy consumption and associated carbon emissions by providing direction
and assistance to residents and businesses for strategic tree planting and establishment
around buildings.
13. Conduct an assessment of municipal urban forest management activities (e.g. pruning,
tree planting) to determine areas where emission reductions can be achieved.
14. Conduct a detailed thermal mapping analysis to identify the thermal "hot-spots" where
tree planting efforts can be prioritized.
15. Develop and implement a tree preservation by-law that regulates the destruction and
injury of trees located on private property.
16. Develop a Tree Protection Policy that outlines guidelines for tree protection zones and
other protection measures to be undertaken for all publically and privately owned trees.
17. Allocate funding to create an Urban Forestry Unit comprised of certified arborists and
other qualified professionals that can implement the recommendations outlined in this
Study as well as actions listed in future urban forest management plans.
18. Research and pursue new partnerships and opportunities to enhance urban forest
stewardship in the City of Pickering.
19. Develop and implement a comprehensive municipal staff training program.
20. Establish an interagency Urban Forest Working Group to liaise with existing
stakeholders and build new partnerships.
21. Work with TRCA to design a target natural heritage system in Pickering that can be
considered for adoption into the City of Pickering Official Plan.
22. Work with Durham Sustain Ability to engage EcoBusiness members in tree planting
activities in commercial and industrial areas.
23. Develop research partnerships to study the impacts of climate change on the urban
forest, and to evaluate the potential for planting more hardy and southern species in
select locations.
24. Work with TRCA, the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and the National Tree Seed
Centre of NRCan to implement a seed collection program for native ash species.
261
25. Develop and implement an urban forest monitoring program that tracks trends in the
structure and distribution of the urban forest using the i-Tree Eco analysis. The structure
and distribution of the urban forest should be comprehensively evaluated at regular
5-year intervals and reported on publicly.
26. Develop and implement an urban forest management plan for the City of Pickering.
27. Utilize the criteria and performance indicators developed by Kenney et al. (2011) to
inform the creation of a strategic urban forest management plan and to assess the
progress made towards urban forest sustainability.
262
RES.#A100/13 - SANMIKE CONSTRUCTION LIMITED
Request for Temporary Licence Agreement for a Temporary Sanitary
Sewer Connection, Rouge River Watershed, Town of Richmond Hill,
Regional Municipality of York, CFN 49299. Receipt of a request from
Sanmike Construction Limited to enter into a temporary licence for the
purpose of constructing and operating a temporary sanitary sewer
connection from the terminus of Claret Court to Sanmike Construction
Limited's residential development.
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: David Barrow
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request
from Sanmike Construction Limited to provide a temporary 3 metre wide licence
containing 0.03 hectares (0.09 acres), more or less, over TRCA-owned lands located on
the east side of Bayview Avenue, south of Elgin Mills Road East, in the Town of Richmond
Hill;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a temporary licence be completed for the
purpose of constructing and operating a temporary sanitary sewer through TRCA-owned
lands being Part of Blocks 22 and 23, Plan 65M-3230 running between Claret Court and
the adjacent lands owned by Sanmike Construction Ltd. in order to facilitate temporary
servicing associated with a Draft Plan of Subdivision consisting of 67 residential
townhouse units;
THAT the licence be for five years, with the option to renew the licence subject to the
concurrence of TRCA to the renewals;
THAT Sanmike Construction Limited pay TRCA the following:
i an upfront amount of$25,000 in exchange for the right to abandon at the end of the
licence term the decommissioned sewer works on the TRCA-owned lands;
ii) licence fee of$750 per annum;
iii) all costs associated with completing the licence.
THAT Sanmike Construction Limited is to fully indemnify and save harmless TRCA from
any and all claims for injuries, damages or loss of any nature resulting in any way either
directly or indirectly from this temporary licence agreement or the carrying out of
construction;
THAT an archaeological investigation be conducted before any site disturbance with any
mitigative measures required being carried out all at the expense of Sanmike
Construction Limited;
263
THAT the licence agreement be on terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA staff and its
solicitors;
AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary
action to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Sanmike Construction Limited has put forward a development application for the construction
of 67 residential townhouse units on its 2.08 hectare lands located on the east side of Bayview
Avenue south of Elgin Mills Road East, Town of Richmond Hill. Sanmike Construction Limited
has requested a temporary licence agreement on a strip of TRCA land being 3 metres wide by
155 metres long, containing 0.03 hectares (0.09 acres), more or less. The purpose of the
licence is for the construction and operation of a temporary sanitary sewer connection from
Sanmike Construction Limited's proposed townhouse development site to the terminus of
Claret Court. The temporary sanitary sewer connection will be required until such time as the
Town of Richmond Hill advises that permanent sanitary connection is available to the proposed
townhouse development site from its Bayview Avenue. The permanent connection is
anticipated within the next five years.
The Master Servicing Plan for the Secondary Plan area contemplates the interim and
permanent sanitary sewers. The permanent connection will be constructed by the Town in the
future and will eliminate the existing sanitary connection on Bayview Avenue, south of the
Sanmike property. As such, until the permanent sanitary line is constructed through the
Sanmike property and east of those lands, only the temporary sanitary connection is possible
to service the Sanmike property. The development block north of Sanmike's property will also
use this temporary connection if the development proceeds prior to the construction of the
permanent sanitary line. As noted above, this proposed interim solution was approved through
the Master Servicing Plan for the Secondary Plan area and has been agreed to between
Sanmike Construction Limited and the Town. That interim solution is subject to TRCA approval
as it involved construction of temporary sanitary sewer force main through TRCA-land to
connect the rear of the 67 residential townhouse development site to the existing sanitary sewer
at the terminus of Claret Court.
Sanmike Construction Limited and the Town have completed technical requirements for the
115 mm long and 200 mm diameter temporary sanitary sewer force main. It is proposed that
construction be started and completed this summer by Sanmike Construction Limited.
Construction would involve digging two bore pits of approximately 2 metres by 2 metres and
feeding the temporary sewer line through the TRCA-owned lands by high pressure directional
drilling underground and 2.5 metres more or less beneath the creek. One pit will be partially on
Claret Court and partially on TRCA-owned lands. The second pit will be constructed on the
Sanmike Development Limited property. Operation of the temporary sanitary sewer force main
and its tie into the Town's existing sanitary line at the terminus of Claret Court will not directly
involve TRCA. At the end of the licence term, Sanmike Construction Limited will decommission
sewer works on the TRCA-owned lands further to terms set out in the licence.
A sketch illustrating the Temporary Licence location is attached.
264
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The total compensation package includes licence fees of$750 plus HST per year and an
upfront payment of$25,000 plus HST in exchange for the right to abandon the
decommissioned sewer works at the end of the licence. Sanmike Construction Limited has
agreed to assume TRCA's legal costs plus the cost of the archaeological investigation and
other costs involved in completing this transaction.
Report prepared by: Dan O'Donohue, extension 5767
Emails: do'donohue @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Dan O'Donohue, extension 5767;
Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Emails: do'donohue @trca.on.ca; mfenning @trca.on.ca
Date: May 31, 2013
Attachments: 1
265
Attachment 1
°
,.„
.....--
-,...—...,.. ......-
..., ,
'.99a094.
\ 9 ,....9,.' , , ■
')('''''"''''''SN. '+'*:ery,-, „' ' 9599999■,' tleemee9999999'7''*enge,*"' '.\-''''.6 ''e'''. ,
040°'
N9 eneeisea..°
\ e
0/1 Vik.51 ;
\
‘..9.1•99.*ft'S.4 ."9 -—'9,,,.*9 \
A
3,..„
\
. . ,.
, ss.....
......_ .
Limited LatiOs I ...
a.,..„ ,°-' ,-..ar, fri-r`,"*. • . 0
rg
\ .,... r ,......,„,„„.....‘,..„ .2,
.. emporary Licence \
-. -
—
t .
04•4..'"- DR4f2 ,,,.E
.9999999./...MON B. //
rliee9I9I.996es
0 01
1C`I'14Q V
' E9Q7"17""1°*4
, ..
. '
, ■
9 e e
„ I
I I I
I I I
Legend 0
,
,,,,..f,_- , p., , DU RHAM
=Tel-loom/Ucence 4NY Conservation .3----
1=1 aanmske Crrstruoton L mired LE,ZE i
) 1 SITE-
••••• Floodline PEEL
°Nateraow•ses
1=1 Regulator'Lim t
,
, ' i ,- TORONTO I
0 25 53 13C 1:53 23C
[ i Parcel Assessment rvieters \
_ _ _ /
Key Map
L4r CLeen's Primer tr Oman°and its licensors [2335]May Not re Reproduced wt,nut Remissly- 7-I5 G NOT A FLAN OF CURVE,'
266
RES.#A101/13 - BOB HUNTER MEMORIAL PARK TRAIL (YORK REGION SOUTHEAST
COLLECTOR)
Supply of Aggregate - Phases IV and V Trail Construction. Award of
contract for the supply and delivery of approximately 7,500 tonnes of
19mm crusher run limestone.
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT the contract for the supply and delivery of approximately 7,500 tonnes of 19mm
crusher run limestone aggregate to the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Trail Phases IV and V,
be awarded to Glenn Windrem Trucking for a total unit price of$16.57 per tonne and a
total cost not to exceed $124,275.00, plus HST, it being the lowest bid meeting Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;
THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of ten
percent (10%) of the total contract price as a contingency allowance, if deemed
necessary;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized and directed to take such action as may be
necessary to implement this contract, including payment authorizations.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
TRCA is working on behalf of the Region of York to implement Phase IV and V of the Bob
Hunter Memorial Park trail system, located on the east side of Reesor Road, in accordance with
the design and specifications prepared in support of the environmental compensation
agreement associated with York Region Southeast Collector project. Phases IV and V trail
works consists of the construction of approximately 1660 metres of 3.5m granular base for a
primary trail, and secondary trail work of approximately 1900 metres of 2.5m granular base.
RATIONALE
Tender documents (RSD 13-085) were sent to the following five suppliers:
• Lafarge North America;
• Glenn Windrem Trucking;
• Strada Aggregates;
• James Dick Aggregates;
• Nelson Aggregate Co.
The Tender Opening Committee opened the quotation on June 7, 2013 with the following
results:
Bidder Unit Price per Tonne Total Contract Price
(Plus HST) (Plus HST)
Glenn Windrem Trucking $16.57 $124,275.00
James Dick Aggregates $17.62 $132,150.00
LaFarge North America $18.00 $135,000.00
Strada Aggregates $19.50 $146,250.00
Nelson Aggregate Co. No Bid No Bid
267
Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Glenn Windrem Trucking be awarded the
contract for the supply and delivery of approximately 7,500 tonnes of 19mm crusher run
limestone for the unit cost of$16.57 per tonne and a total amount not to exceed $124,275.00,
plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that meets TRCA specifications
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available within account #111-61 from the Region of York.
Report prepared by: Scott Davison, extension 6402
Emails: sdavison @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Scott Davison, extension 6402
Emails: sdavison @trca.on.ca
Date: June 04, 2013
RES.#A102/13 - COATSWORTH CUT PROJECT
Contract RSD13-080 - Channel Dredging Works. Award of Contract
RSD13-080 for channel maintenance dredging of the navigation channel
at Coatsworth Cut, Ashbridge's Bay Park, City of Toronto.
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT Contract RSD13-080 be awarded to Catalina Excavating Inc. for the channel
maintenance dredging of Coatsworth Cut for the total cost not to exceed $138,244.00,
plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) specifications;
THAT staff be authorized to spend the project contingency amount of$60,000.00, if
available, to complete additional dredging to the limit of available funding of$250,000.00
from the City of Toronto;
THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded
contractors, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the
other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting
TRCA specifications;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)
officials be directed to take any action necessary to implement the agreement including
obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution of documents.
CARRIED
268
BACKGROUND
In 1983, TRCA began dredging operations at the mouth of Coatsworth Cut to maintain
navigation between Lake Ontario and the boating facilities located at Ashbridge's Bay Park. As
a result of ever increasing dredging volumes and associated expenses, TRCA began to
investigate shoreline modification options that would eliminate the need for annual
maintenance dredging in 1999.
Currently the long-term solution to the sedimentation problem in Coatsworth Cut is being
addressed through a number of planning initiatives, however TRCA plans to continue with
maintenance dredging until such time that the final solution is in place and sedimentation rates
are confirmed to be declining in response. As of the date this communication was prepared,
implementation of the preferred solution was expected to commence in 2014 pending receipt of
the necessary approvals and funding, with work anticipating to take 4 - 6 years to complete.
Maintenance dredging at Coatsworth Cut was last completed in the summer of 2012 with the
removal of approximately 2,400 cubic metres of material. The dredged material was tested and
deemed to meet parkland quality guidelines for disposal at Tommy Thompson Park (TTP) for
use in the construction of habitat projects within the park. TRCA performed an updated
sounding survey of the channel in May 2013, which indicated that additional material had been
deposited within portions of the channel since completion of dredging operations in 2012.
RATIONALE
Ongoing deposition reduces available water depth in the channel, creating a hazard to boaters
and limiting marine-based emergency access if not addressed. To reduce the risk of property
damage and personal injury, TRCA proposes to dredge approximately 2,600 cubic metres of
material based on the results of a recent hydrographic survey by staff, commencing the first
week of July 2013 pending the receipt of all necessary approvals and execution of agreements.
Material is proposed to be removed using a combination of water and land based equipment
for dredging and off site disposal to TTP for use in the construction of on site habitat projects as
part of the master plan implementation.
As it is standard practice to include a healthy contingency in project estimation in the event of
unforeseen events, $60,000 has been set aside as the project contingency. However as it is
desirable to remove as much sediment as possible with the available budget in light of the
ongoing deposition, it is recommended that as the dredging volume of 2,600 cubic metres is
approached, staff review the total project costs to date, and any remaining funds held as
contingency be released to fund the removal of additional material from the navigation channel.
Tender RSD13-080 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo
http://www.biddingo.com/) on Friday, May 24, 2013 with a mandatory site information meeting
held on Thursday May 30, 2013. Tender packages were sent to the following 20 contractors:
• Alcam Excavating Ltd.;
• Alloa Excavating;
• Anthony's Excavating Central Inc.;
• Catalina Excavating Inc.;
• Cedar Springs Landscape Group;
• Dean Construction Co. Ltd.;
269
• Dynex Construction Inc.;
• Erocon Environmental Group Inc;
• Galcon Marine Ltd.
• General Diving Contractors Inc.;
• Great Lakes Offshore Services Inc.;
• Kehoe Marine Construction;
• Kenwood Trenching & Excavating Ltd.;
• Layfield Geosythetics & Industrial Fabric;
• Limestone and Forestry Products;
• Metric Contracting Services Corporation;
• Multiview;
• Northgate Farm Ltd;
• Pave-1 Construction Ltd;
• The Ontario Construction Company Ltd.
The Tender Opening Committee opened the tenders on June 7, 2013 with the following results:
Tender RSD13-080
Coatsworth Cut Channel Maintenance Dredging
BIDDERS TOTAL TENDER AMOUNT
(Plus HST)
Catalina Excavating Inc $138,244.00
Galcon Marine Ltd. $179,130.00
I Dean Construction Co. Ltd. $399,603.00
Seventeen contractors: Alcam Excavating Ltd., Alloa Excavating, Anthony's Excavating Central
Inc., Cedar Springs Landscape Group, Dynex Construction Inc., Erocon Environmental Group
Inc, General Diving Contractors Inc., Great lakes offshore services Inc., Kehoe Marine
Construction, Kenwood Trenching & Excavating Ltd., Layfield Geosythetics & Industrial Fabric,
limestone and forestry products, Metric Contracting Services Corporation, Multiview, Northgate
Farm Ltd, Pave-1 Construction Ltd. and The Ontario Construction Company Ltd. declined the
opportunity to submit a bid, being unable to meet the timelines and specifications stated in the
contract documents.
Restoration Services staff reviewed the bid received from Catalina Excavating Inc. against its
own cost estimate and have determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the
requirements as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by TRCA staff of
Catalina Excavating Inc.'s experience and ability to undertake similar projects was conducted
through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that Catalina Excavating Inc. is
capable of undertaking the scope of work.
Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Catalina Excavating Inc. be awarded
Contract RSD13-080 for channel maintenance dredging of the navigation channel at
Coatsworth Cut, City of Toronto, for a total amount not to exceed $138,244.00, plus a
contingency amount of$60,000.00 to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it
being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.
270
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding is available under City of Toronto Waterfront Capital 2013 budget, within account
number 211-16.
Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 416-786-5128
Emails: mguy @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9726
Emails: jdickie @trca.on.ca
Date: June 14, 2013
RES.#A103/13 - DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL
Membership Changes. Appointment and resignation from Don
Watershed Regeneration Council membership.
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT the following revised membership of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council be
approved:
Don Watershed Regeneration Council - New Appointment
1) Heinz, Peter- City of Toronto resident
Don Watershed Regeneration Council - Resignation
1) Hough, John - City of Toronto resident.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Terms of Reference for the Don Watershed Regeneration Council, dated November 2012,
was approved at Authority Meeting #9/12, held on November 30, 2012. Section 5 of the Terms
of Reference sets out that any resignations or recommendations for new members be
presented to the Authority for approval. Over the normal course of the term of the Don
Watershed Regeneration Council, a number of members resign and new members are brought
on board.
This communication is presented to request the Authority approve Mr. Peter Heinz as a
member of the Don Watershed Council, and to advise the Authority of the resignation of Mr.
John Hough.
Report prepared by: Arlen Leeming, 5283
Emails: aleeming @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Arlen Leeming, 5283
Emails: aleeming @trca.on.ca
Date: June 18, 2013
271
RES.#A104/13 - PROPOSED CANADIAN TIRE WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION CENTRE,
TOWN OF CALEDON, REGION OF PEEL
Delegation of approval authority to the Chair and CEO to approve and
issue O. Reg. 166/06 permits to facilitate the development of a
nation-wide warehouse distribution centre.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Linda Pabst
THAT the Chair and Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to approve the
permits for the proposed Canadian Tire Warehouse Distribution Centre, legally described
as Part of Lots 5, 6 and 7, Concession 5 (Geographic Township of Albion), and
municipally known as 13074, 13218, 13226, 13240, 13262 and 13304 Coleraine Drive,
Town of Caledon, Region of Peel.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located within the northwest quadrant of Coleraine Drive and Healey
Road to the southwest of Bolton, is legally described as Part of Lots 5, 6 and 7, Concession 5
(Geographic Township of Albion), and municipally known as 13074, 13218, 13226, 13240,
13262 and 13304 Coleraine Drive (see attached Location Map). The subject lands are located
within the proposed Bolton Rural Service Centre settlement boundary expansion area, and are
subject to the approval of Town of Caledon Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 226 (as modified
and subject to an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board), Regional Official Plan Amendment
(ROPA) 10-002 and subsequent local Planning Act approvals. The purpose of the boundary
expansion is to add employment lands to Bolton to meet the Provincial Growth Plan targets for
the Town of Caledon. As part of the Municipal Comprehensive Review to support the ROPA,
the Town of Caledon initiated a Comprehensive Environmental Impact Study and Management
Plan (CEISMP) that has been completed to the satisfaction of the TRCA. The findings of the
CEISMP provide the basis for the site level technical analysis required for the proposed
warehouse distribution centre.
Two headwater tributaries of the Clarkway Tributary within the Humber River Watershed
traverse the subject property on the east and west, merge at the south of the property at Healey
Rd. and continues south past Mayfield Rd. These watercourses have associated floodplain and
drain to the main Humber River branch in the City of Brampton. As such, a portion of the
subject lands are regulated by the TRCA under Ontario Regulation (0. Reg.) 166/06, as
amended, and are subject to the policies within TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program (VSCMP).
Development Proposal
The applicant wishes to build a large nation-wide commercial distribution centre on a site with
an area of approximately 73.1 ha (180.7 ac). The warehouse distribution centre (including an
2 2
approximately 5,203 m (56,000 ft) two-storey office component) along with associated
buildings and uses has a total gross floor area of approximately 132,201 m 2 (1,423,000 ft 2).
272
The applicant proposes to amend the Town of Caledon Official Plan to re-designate the lands
from "Prime Agricultural Area" to "Prestige Industrial", "General Industrial" and "Environmental
Policy Area" in order to permit a warehouse distribution facility and associated uses.
Furthermore, the applicant proposes to amend the Zoning from Agricultural (A1) and
Environmental Protection Area 2 (EPA2) to Serviced Industrial - Exception XXX (MS-XXX),
Serviced Industrial - Exception XXX (MS-XXX), Prestige Industrial - Exception XXX (MP-XXX)
and Environmental Policy Area 1 (EPA1).
The lands subject to the proposal are located outside of the Bolton Rural Service Centre, but
are projected to be within an Employment land use designation upon the final processing and
approval of the South Albion Bolton Employment and North Hill Supermarket Boundary
Expansion. This process could take upwards of three years. Given the importance of the
Canadian Tire proposal for the Town, the Region and the Province, the Town of Caledon has an
interest in advancing the planning applications and finalizing Official Plan Amendment and
Zoning By-law Amendment documents for enactment upon the conclusion of processes which
result in the allowance of employment uses on the subject lands.
TRCA Interests
TRCA staff has been working collaboratively with the Town of Caledon, Region of Peel, the
proponent and their consultants team since 2010, to identify and assess the natural heritage
and aquatic features on the site, and the stormwater management requirements for the
development. The Comprehensive Environmental Impact Study and Management Plan
(CEISMP) has recommended a natural heritage system and prepared development constraint
mapping for the lands within the proposed boundary expansion area. Through the site-level
analysis for the proposed development, it was confirmed that the two tributaries on the subject
property have the potential, through restoration, to contribute to or become direct fish habitat.
A Headwater Drainage Features Assessment was completed for the two headwater tributaries
and TRCA staff support the proposed realignments, which would result in an enhancement to
the existing condition and will form part of the overall natural heritage system for the new
employment area in Bolton. The proponent has committed to a long-term monitoring program
(i.e. 10 years) for the realigned tributaries, and the Town of Caledon will hold securities for the
works and monitoring.
TRCA staff supports the CEISMP findings that stormwater management to the regional storm
level is required for the lands within the proposed boundary expansion area to mitigate current
and future downstream flooding risks. Regional level stormwater management is an emerging
issue for the TRCA and other conservation authorities across Southern Ontario. As new
greenfield development proceeds beyond the existing urban boundaries, particularly within the
headwater areas of our watersheds, hydrology and hydraulic modelling is demonstrating that
stormwater management facilities that control up to the regional storm level are required to
reduce the flood risk downstream. The consultant team worked closely with TRCA staff to
design a regional stormwater management control facility for the subject site, which includes a
conventional stormwater management pond in conjunction with parking lot and rooftop
storage. The approach to stormwater management for the site has achieved the required
regional level storm control while providing sufficient developable surface area for the proposed
distribution centre. Low Impact Development (LID) measures are also proposed for water
quality management and on-site water retention, which contributes to the treatment train
approach for the site.
273
Permit applications and associated fees have been received by the TRCA. Three permits are
required to facilitate topsoil stripping, the natural channel realignment and the construction of
the stormwater management pond. TRCA staff has been reviewing the municipal planning
applications and TRCA permit applications concurrently.
TRCA staff recognizes that higher order planning legislation has not been approved for the
proposed Bolton Rural Service Centre settlement boundary expansion area. However, based
on our review and understanding of the applications, TRCA staff would not object to the Official
Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment if the existing Official Plan designation and Zoning would
have permitted the proposed uses. Furthermore, should the necessary planning approvals be
in place, TRCA staff would recommend approval of the permits required to facilitate the
development.
RATIONALE
The subject lands are not currently designated as settlement area in either the Region of Peel
Official Plan or the Town of Caledon Official Plan. However, the Town has undertaken the
required Municipal Comprehensive Review, which included the completion of the CEISMP to
the satisfaction of the TRCA, and the Town initiated a Regional Official Plan Amendment
(ROPA) application that would designate the subject lands as settlement area. It is the position
of the Town of Caledon staff that the proposed Canadian Tire warehouse distribution centre is
an important economic opportunity. Canadian Tire has selected the subject site partially
because it provides for an efficient use of transportation systems. It is forecasted that the
proposed development will provide Full-time Equivalent (FTE) employment of approximately
1,220 employees based on a Fiscal Impact Assessment. Given the importance of the proposed
development to the Province, Region of Peel and Town of Caledon, the CAO of the Town of
Caledon has requested that the TRCA consider expediting the approval of the required permits
to facilitate the development, once the necessary planning approvals (i.e. Zoning) be granted
for the Canadian Tire warehouse distribution centre. Therefore, by delegating approval
authority to the Chair and CEO to approve the TRCA permits, staff has the flexibility to meet the
Town's timelines.
Report prepared by: Leilani Lee-Yates, extension 5370
Emails: Ilee-yates @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214
Emails: cwoodland @trca.on.ca
Date: June 18, 2013
Attachments: 1
274
Attachment 1
MAP LOCATION: AUTH7.6 - Canadian Tire, Town of Caledon, Region of Peel
\ ,
-rt , -7 ; -.5 i N.'‘. 2,-- .-2---' :'c ' ) ,„.,„\ ,,,,,.....-4
.sue - _ � D2 )
1.*:, 79_ .—,-, -±
. 1 'A z
Q _ v
_ p
v/..\ SHVi1--
6 R�
k\ ' p
-11 '1 f - `_l\t
275
RES.#A105/13 - 2012 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The 2012 audited financial statements are recommended for approval.
(Budget/Audit Res.#C7/13)
Moved by: Cynthia Thorburn
Seconded by: Deb Schulte
THAT the transfer of funds from surplus to reserves in the amount of$2,613,534 during
2012, as outlined in the schedule to the financial statements entitled "Continuity of
Reserves", be approved;
AND FURTHER THAT the 2012 audited financial statements, as presented, be approved,
signed by the Chair and Secretary-Treasurer of Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA), and distributed to each member municipality and the Minister of
Natural Resources, in accordance with subsection 38 (3) of the Conservation Authorities
Act.
CARRIED
RES.#A106/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed
Geranium Homes (Ninth Line) Limited, CFN 49273. Acquisition of
property located west of Ninth Line and north of Millard Street (north of
Main Street) in the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, Regional Municipality
of York, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood
Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River watershed.
(Executive Res.#B58/13)
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Maria Augimeri
THAT 4.29 hectares (10.6 acres), more or less, of vacant land, being Part of Lot 2,
Concession 8 and designated as Part 1 on 65R-34182, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville,
Regional Municipality of York, be purchased from Geranium Homes (Ninth Line) Limited;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land
free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land
transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
276
RES.#A107/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed
3E Capital Inc., CFN 49284. Purchase of property located south of
Highway No. 401, east of Salem Road (200 Achilles Road), Town of Ajax,
Regional Municipality of Durham, under the "Greenlands Acquisition
Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component,
Carruthers Creek watershed.
(Executive Res.#B59/13)
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Maria Augimeri
THAT 0.20 hectares (0.49 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 6,
Concession 1 and designated as Part 4 on Plan 40R-27898, Town of Ajax, Regional
Municipality of Durham, located south of Highway No. 401, east of Salem Road (200
Achilles Road) , be purchased from 3E Capital Inc.;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the
lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest
possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A108/13 - REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL
Conveyance of Land and a Permanent Easement for the Gore Road
Widening , City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, Humber River
Watershed
CFN 49221. Receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of Peel
for conveyance of land and a permanent easement for road widening of
Gore Road from Queen Street to Regional Road 50 in the City of
Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel.
(Executive Res.#B60/13)
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Maria Augimeri
277
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request
from the Regional Municipality of Peel (Region of Peel) to convey certain lands and a
permanent easement for the road widening of Gore Road from Queen Street to Regional
Road 50;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to
cooperate with the Region of Peel in this instance;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA-owned lands containing 0.70 hectares
(1.74 acres), more or less, being Part of Lot 2, Concession 9, Northern Division
(Geographic Township of Toronto Gore) designated as Part 7 on Part 43R-34881 be
conveyed to the Region of Peel for the widening of Gore Road from Queen Street to
Regional Road 50 in the City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel;
THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.0017 hectares (0.0044 acres), more or
less, be granted to the Region of Peel for hydro pole anchor in connection with the
widening of Gore Road from Queen Street to Regional Road 50 in the City of Brampton,
Regional Municipality of Peel in the City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel,
being Part of Lot 2, Concession 9, Northern Division (Geographic Township of Toronto
Gore) designated as Part 8 on Part 43R-34881;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of$2.00, plus all legal, survey and other
costs;
THAT archaeological investigation is to be conducted before any site disturbance with
any mitigative measures required being carried out, all at the expense of the Region of
Peel;
THAT the Region of Peel be responsible for all legal, survey and other costs related to the
land conveyance;
THAT all permits pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06 be obtained by the Region of Peel
prior to the commencement of construction;
THAT the Region of Peel is to fully indemnify and save harmless TRCA from any and all
claims for injuries, damages or loss of any nature resulting in any way either directly or
indirectly from this sale or easement or the carrying out of construction;
THAT said conveyance and easement is subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural
Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O.
1990, Chapter C.27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may
be required to implement the conveyance and easement, including obtaining needed
approvals and the signing and execution of documents.
CARRIED
278
RES.#A109/13 - SWAN LAKE RESIDENCE RETROFIT AND RENOVATION PROJECT
Tender PMO13-04. Award of Contract PMO13-04 for interior and exterior
alterations at the Swan Lake Residence (1229 Bethesda Road), Town of
Richmond Hill.
(Executive Res.#B61/13)
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT contract PMO13-04 for the interior and exterior alterations at the Swan Lake
Residence (1229 Bethesda Road) be awarded to Berkim Construction Inc. at a total cost
not to exceed $1,728,350.00, plus 20% contingency, plus HST, subject to receipt of all
necessary approvals, permits and funding, it being the lowest bid meeting Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;
THAT the contract be subject to terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA staff and, as
necessary, solicitor;
THAT should staff be unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable tender agreement with
the above-mentioned contractor, staff be authorized to enter into contract negotiations
with other contractors, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA
specifications;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized officials be directed to take the necessary action to
implement the contract including the signing and execution of documents;
CARRIED
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES.#A110/13 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by: David Barrow
Seconded by: Dave Ryan
THAT Section II items EX8.1 and EX8.2, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #4/13,
held on June 7, 2013, be received.
Section II Items EX8.1 & EX8.2
CANADA GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL GREATER TORONTO CHAPTER
(Executive Res.#B62/13)
MUD CREEK REACH 5 PROJECT
(Executive Res.#B63/13)
279
ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
RES.#A111/13 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Maria Augimeri
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06 items EX10.1 - EX10.100, contained in Executive
Committee Minutes #4/13, held on June 7, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:21 a.m., on Friday, June 21, 2013.
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/ks
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
ROUGEPARKALLIANCE
2013BUDGETESTIMATE
June102013
20122013
ApprovedBudget
SourceofFunds:
Canada/WaterfrontRegenerationTrust/TRCA425,000237,600
Canada/WaterfrontRegenerationTrust/TRCACarryforward229,700
TRCAMunicipalLevies134,000
GovernmentofCanada600,000
YorkRegion/TRCABHMPSECenhancement40,000
YorkRegion/TRCA(implmentedbyTRCA)
r
MunicipalMarkham(ConsolidatedPlan)50,000
York25,000
Interest1,0001,000
TRCARentalRevenuenet60,00060,000
ProvincialSpecial2007allocationCarryforward45,000
TRCAGMSalaryandbenefits132,000
GreenbeltFdn./ConservationFdnofGreaterToronto55,000
TrilliumFoundation20,000
FederalTransportCanada5,000
DonationsandSundry15,10010,000
TopsoilHabitatBermCreationProject146,60060,000
TOTALSOURCEOFFUNDS 1,253,7001,198,300
Expenditures:
PlanningandCoordination
Salariesandbenefits240,000240,000
Supportcosts38,00038,000
Planningprojects75,000
353,000278,000
NaturalHeritageProtection,Restoration,Stewardship
Salariesandbenefits170,000170,000
Supportcosts26,40026,400
196,400196,400
Restorationandstewardshipprojects
NGONaturalHeritageProjects180,000220,000
NGOYorkRegionBHMPProjects100,000
NGOprojectsupportcosts100,000138,000
Stewardshipactivities8,300
Smallgrants2,0002,000
382,000368,300
HeritageAppreciationVisitorExperience(HAVE)
Salariesandbenefits209,300209,300
Supportcosts41,90041,900
HAVEprojects
Interpretivecentre15,60018,000
Trailassociation16,400
RougeFest52,000
TourdeGreenbelt30,500
Signs25,00018,000
322,300355,600
TOTALEXPENSES 1,253,7001,198,300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
Mississauga News “Steelheads face an uphill battle in polluted river” story about howyou do
not have to get out of the city to see a splash of nature. Steelheads are making their annual
run up the H
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
Toronto and Region
Conservation
Authority
MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY#7/13
September 27, 2013
The Authority Meeting #7/13, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village,
on Friday, September 27, 2013. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to
order at 9:42 a.m.
PRESENT
Paul Ainslie Member
Maria Augimeri Vice Chair
Ben Cachola Member
Bob Callahan Member
Raymond Cho Member
Ronald Chopowick Member
Vincent Crisanti Member
Glenn De Baeremaeker Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Chris Fonseca Member
Jack Heath Member
Colleen Jordan Member
Mujeeb Khan Member
Glenn Mason Member
Mike Mattos Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair
Linda Pabst Member
John Parker Member
Anthony Perruzza Member
Dave Ryan Member
Deb Schulte Member
John Sprovieri Member
Cynthia Thorburn Member
Jim Tovey Member
Richard Whitehead Member
ABSENT
David Barrow Member
Gloria Lindsay Luby Member
Peter Milczyn Member
338
RES.#A136/13 - MINUTES
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Linda Pabst
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #6/13, held on July 26, 2013, be approved.
CARRIED
DELEGATIONS
(a) A delegation by Mr. Jim Robb, General Manager, Friends of the Rouge Watershed Inc.,
speaking in regard to ongoing challenges accessing restoration sites in the Rouge
watershed.
RES.#A137/13 - DELEGATIONS
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Cynthia Thorburn
THAT above-noted delegation (a) be received.
CARRIED
PRESENTATIONS
(b) A presentation by Ralph Toninger, Manager, Restoration Projects, TRCA, and Chris
Robinson, Program Coordinator, Atlantic Salmon Restoration, Ontario Federation of
Anglers and Hunters, in regard to item AUTH7.2 - Humber Atlantic Salmon Habitat
Restoration and Partnerships.
RES.#A138/13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: Paul Ainslie
Seconded by: Dave Ryan
THAT above-noted presentation (a) be received.
CARRIED
339
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#A139/13 - ROUGE PARK NATURAL HERITAGE GRANT PROGRAM UPDATE
Update on projects funded by the 2013 Rouge Park Natural Heritage
Grant Program and process for planning 2014 conservation programs in
the Rouge National Urban Park study area.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Cynthia Thorburn
WHEREAS nine 2013 Rouge Park Natural Heritage Grant Program projects were funded
by the Waterfront Regeneration Trust and approved by the Authority on November 30,
2012;
WHEREAS Parks Canada is developing a strategic management plan, including a long
term conservation approach for Rouge National Urban Park (RNUP) that will meet Parks
Canada's internationally-recognized scientific standards for ecosystem health;
AND WHEREAS the Waterfront Regeneration Trust will continue its investment in the
protection and restoration of the Rouge Valley as a partner of Parks Canada within the
context of the strategic management plan.
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
(TRCA) staff work to oversee the completion of the 2013 Rouge Park Natural Heritage
Grant Program projects and report back to the Authority, Parks Canada and the
Waterfront Regeneration Trust accordingly;
THAT staff be directed to work collaboratively with Parks Canada to identify conservation
needs and project opportunities within the Rouge National Urban Park study area for
2014, consistent with Parks Canada's conservation approach and strategic management
plan;
THAT opportunities for external partnerships in these projects be considered, where
appropriate and feasible;
THAT staff be directed to work with Parks Canada to keep external partners and
community groups informed as the process evolves;
AND FURTHER THAT Parks Canada and the Waterfront Regeneration Trust be so
advised.
AMENDMENT
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Deb Schulte
THAT the 3rd last paragraph of the main motion be amended to read:
340
THAT opportunities for external partnerships in these projects be considered, where
appropriate and feasible, with a goal of providing reliable, early multi-year access to
restoration sites in 2014, 2015 and future years.
THE AMENDMENT WAS NOT CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Since 1996, Rouge Park has provided funding to groups and organizations working in the
Rouge River watershed to preserve and restore its natural and cultural heritage. The Rouge
Park Natural Heritage grant program has funded many worthwhile projects over the years,
including habitat restoration, research and monitoring, and species recovery efforts. For the
2013 funding year, the Authority approved a total allocation of$168,645.11 in funding provided
by the Waterfront Regeneration Trust to nine projects, as detailed in Attachment 1.
Overall, the projects have been progressing successfully and are meeting objectives. Project
highlights include:
• Volunteers from Citizen Scientists have spent all summer documenting the diversity of
dragonflies and damselflies (odonates) in Rouge Park, including many rare species.
• The Toronto Zoo has carried out intensive mussel surveys in Rouge National Urban Park,
searching for many species which are rare, at-risk and often overlooked.
• The Toronto Zoo continues to work closely with RNUP to conserve at-risk reptiles, through
the blandings' turtle headstart program and milksnake population surveys. Thirty-two
blandings'turtle hatchlings are now being housed at the Toronto Zoo; ten two-year old
turtles are set to be released in RNUP in 2014, and another 22 collected and hatched this
year will be ready for release in 2015. Zoo staff has also identified two important
hibernacula (overwintering sites) for milksnakes, which will help inform conservation efforts
for the species.
th
• 10,000 Trees for the Rouge Valley System carried out their 24 annual tree planting event,
and have successfully reforested approximately three hectares with the involvement of an
estimated 2,000 volunteers during a large scale one day planting event.
• Ontario Streams has been controlling invasive species in wetlands they previously restored,
and will be carrying out an assessment of many of their past stream restoration projects to
determine which methods were most successful to inform possible future work.
• Ontario Streams will be completing 840m of in-stream rehabilitation and enhancement,
200m of riparian planting and collecting up-to-date information for benthic, fisheries and
temperature data on a section of Little Rouge Creek, continuing a multi-year project funded
by Rouge Park.
• The Rouge Valley Naturalists are set to begin fall tree planting in the Bob Hunter Memorial
Park Area. The group will reforest about three hectares while delivering at least eight days
of practical outdoor learning for school students in accordance with the Ontario Ministry of
Education curriculum.
• Friends of the Rouge Watershed (FRW) has reforested approximately 5.4 ha. of the Park
with funding from the grant program.
341
Of all the projects listed above, only one has experienced significant challenges. Although
funding was approved for FRW to reforest 10.9 ha through the 2013 grant program, the group
will only complete 5.4 ha of the approved work. Access to two of the reforestation sites allotted
to FRW was at the discretion of an adjacent landowner/tenant, subject to an access agreement
being signed by both parties. Although FRW was responsible for acquiring all necessary
access permissions prior to commencement of any work, as per terms of their memorandum of
understanding (MOU) with TRCA, staff assisted in every way possible, including conversations
with the landowner/tenant, numerous reminders to FRW to obtain an access agreement, and
finally drafting and negotiating the access agreement on behalf of FRW and the
landowner/tenant. TRCA staff had kept FRW informed about these discussions and that
arrangements were occurring. TRCA staff also informed FRW that there was to be no access
whatsoever to the private property until the access agreement was in place. Discussions with
the tenant were well on track to ensure access permissions in time for FRW's first planting event
on this site, as stated in the event schedule sent to TRCA staff. However, at a point when the
agreement was nearly finalized, TRCA staff began to receive numerous calls from the tenant
complaining that FRW had been driving over his property without permission. Although TRCA
staff attempted to intervene and remind FRW not to access the property without permission, the
tenant continued to report, over the next two days, that FRW staff was using his property
without permission. The tenant became increasingly angry about the alleged trespass and
reported conduct of FRW towards himself and his subtenants. The confrontation culminated
with York Regional Police being called to site by the tenant to remove FRW from the property.
Following this series of incidents, the tenant stated in no uncertain terms that FRW would never
be allowed access through his property.
As access by FRW to the two restoration sites had been entirely foreclosed, TRCA had no
choice but to withdraw those two sites from FRW's planting contract. TRCA staff met with FRW
and offered to purchase any surplus stock the group was left with as a result of the site
withdrawals, and offered a reasonable amendment to the funding agreement. However, FRW
insisted that they should retain the entire amount of funding that was originally approved, even
though they would only be able to complete about half the restoration agreed to in the original
contract. Although FRW representatives had told TRCA staff, verbally and in writing, that they
had no surplus trees to sell, they later claimed to have been left with thousands of surplus trees
that were subsequently planted on other RNUP sites without TRCA approval, and FRW insisted
that they should be paid for this unapproved work. FRW engaged legal counsel to argue this
case on their behalf, which forced TRCA to incur its own legal costs in response. Finally, when
FRW refused to sign a fair amendment to their 2013 restoration contract, TRCA terminated the
contract effective August 15th, 2013. FRW has been offered a final payment of$33,032.00 for
restoration work completed under the grant program up to the date of contract termination.
Finally, TRCA staff is working to complete planned reforestation on the areas withdrawn from
FRW's contract and expects planting of these sites to be completed by spring of 2014.
342
Future Conservation Work in Rouge Park
With the dissolution of the Rouge Park Alliance, the current Rouge Park Natural Heritage Grant
Program will conclude at the end of the 2013 funding year. In the coming months, Parks
Canada will be developing its own conservation approach for Rouge National Urban Park,
which will be outlined in the strategic management plan for the Park. Although this approach is
intended to incorporate elements of the excellent conservation and restoration work conducted
to date in the Park, Parks Canada will be developing its own program with associated
requirements and processes. TRCA is working collaboratively with Parks Canada to identify
conservation needs and project opportunities within the Rouge National Urban Park study area
for 2014. Parks Canada has also indicated that opportunities for partnership with external
groups will be considered, where appropriate and feasible. It is anticipated that Parks Canada
will complete the strategic management plan and conservation approach for the Park by the
end of 2013 or early 2014. Furthermore the Waterfront Regeneration Trust, which has funded
the Rouge Park Natural Heritage Grant Program to date, will continue its investment in the
protection and restoration of the Rouge Valley as a partner of Parks Canada within the context
of the strategic management plan.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
TRCA staff will oversee the completion of all projects as part of the 2013 Rouge Park Natural
Heritage Grant Program. Once all the required project work is properly complete and the final
reports have been submitted, TRCA staff will release the remainder of the grant funds to the
various project partnership groups. TRCA will use the grant funds withdrawn from the one
planting contract to complete the restoration work on the two remaining sites by the spring of
2014. TRCA staff will report back to the Authority, Parks Canada and the Waterfront
Regeneration Trust upon the completion of all projects as part of the 2013 Rouge Park Natural
Heritage Grant Program. Finally, TRCA staff will continue to consult with Parks Canada on the
strategic management plan, as well as the long term conservation approach for the Rouge
National Urban Park and will work collaboratively to keep external partners and community
groups informed.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The Waterfront Regeneration Trust provided $237,600.00 for the 2013 Rouge Park Natural
Heritage Grant Program of which $168,645.11 was allocated as grants to partnership groups
and $68,954.89 was provided to TRCA for project support costs, such as site preparation and
property clearance work. These funds are available in account 680-04.
TRCA staff will use the$34,113.40 removed from the FRW grant allocation to complete the
required planting on the 5.5 hectares of property in Rouge National Urban Park.
TRCA staff will cover the required legal fees for cancellation of the FRW planting contract as
part of general revenues in the approved 2013 Rouge Park budget from account 680-01.
Report prepared by: Maria Papoulias, 905-713-6038; Mike Bender, extension 5287
Emails: mpapoulias @trca.on.ca; mbender @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Maria Papoulias, 905-713-6038, Mike Bender extension 5287
Emails: mpapoulias @trca.on.ca, mbender @trca.on.ca
Date: September 18, 2013
Attachments: 1
343
Attachment 1
Funding allocated to projects under the 2013 Rouge Park Natural Heritage Grant Program
FUNDING APPROVED
PROJECT (Max. Per Project
Plus HST)
Odonate Survey of Rouge Park (Citizen Scientists) $2,440.00
I Freshwater Mussels in Rouge Park (Toronto Zoo) $6,700.00
Forest Succession 2013 (10,000 Trees for the
Rouge) $25,000.00
Stream and Wetland Restoration Evaluation Project
$8,668.91
(Ontario Streams)
Bob Hunter Memorial Park Diversification Restoration $26,000.00
Project (Rouge Valley Naturalists)
Species at Risk Reptile Recovery in Rouge Park
(Toronto Zoo) $9,315.00
Rouge Park Phragmites Control and Maintenance $8,700.00
Project (Ontario Streams)
Habitat Restoration on Priority Rouge Park Sites $67,145.40
(Friends of the Rouge Watershed)
Little Rouge Creek Rehabilitation and Monitoring $14,675.80
Initiative (Ontario Streams)
344
RES.#A140/03 - HUMBER RIVER ATLANTIC SALMON HABITAT RESTORATION AND
PARTNERSHIPS
Continuing partnership with Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters,
as well as the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources toward restoring
Atlantic Salmon habitat in the Humber River watershed.
Moved by: Paul Ainslie
Seconded by: Dave Ryan
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) continue its partnership with
Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters (OFAH) and the Ontario Ministry of Natural
Resources (MNR), in the Humber River Watershed Working Group to pursue restoration
goals for Atlantic salmon habitat in the Humber River watershed;
THAT TRCA support the stocking of juvenile Atlantic salmon on its property at designated
sites;
THAT TRCA and its partners approach its municipal partners to seek opportunities to
implement the Humber River Atlantic Salmon Strategy;
THAT TRCA collaborate with OFAH and MNR in media events to publicize Atlantic salmon
restoration efforts in the Humber River watershed;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA report back on the successes of both the Duffins and Humber
Atlantic salmon programs next year.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters, the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources,
conservation authorities, together with many other partners, are working to bring Atlantic
salmon back to Lake Ontario. This treasured species is an important part of our natural heritage
and part of Ontario's rich biodiversity. In 2006, OFAH, MNR and more than 40 partners
launched a major initiative to restore a self-sustaining Atlantic salmon population to Lake
Ontario and its streams.
The re-introduction of Atlantic salmon into Toronto region watersheds is a program led by MNR,
in partnership with OFAH, conservation authorities, and many other stakeholder groups and
clubs. TRCA first partnered with the program in the Duffins Creek watershed in 2006, focusing
on the restoration of aquatic and contributing habitat. To accomplish this TRCA, MNR and
OFAH developed the Duffins Creek Atlantic Salmon Working Group with the goal of developing
a coordinated strategic approach to restoration efforts in the Duffins Creek watershed. Based
on the success of the program in the Duffins Creek watershed, a similar working group was
established in 2011 with the focus of targeting activities in the Humber River watershed.
345
Restoration of aquatic habitat and the removal of barriers are critical to the success of Atlantic
salmon recovery in the Humber River watershed. TRCA, MNR and OFAH have been working
together with nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) such as Ontario Streams to identify and
implement aquatic restoration objectives that complement recovery efforts for Atlantic salmon.
The Humber River Atlantic Salmon Working Group has focused on coordinating and prioritizing
restoration projects and programs, and has met and exchanged information regularly since
2011.
Some of the larger impediments to establishing an Atlantic salmon population in the Humber
River are:
• barriers across rivers;
• low availability of prey in the lake environment;
• increasing water temperatures in streams;
• sedimentation of spawning grounds;
• low availability of refuge and rearing habitat in the rivers;
• general poor water quality.
TRCA engages in a watershed-wide Restoration Opportunities Planning Process (ROP) for the
development of a Restoration Opportunities Bank. With input and data from OFAH and MNR
regarding key reaches for Atlantic salmon life stages, stocking sites and barrier information, the
Humber Atlantic Salmon Working Group has worked towards a shared, prioritized aquatic
restoration strategy for the Humber River. Priority activities that support the objectives of the
Atlantic Salmon Recovery Program have been developed and act as the basis for a
coordinated, cooperative restoration approach for TRCA, MNR and OFAH in the Humber River.
This strategy will be the foundation of a multi-year implementation program and will be
coordinated between agencies and other stakeholders and interested groups.
The Duffins Atlantic Salmon Working Group has been a great success, and TRCA and its
partners hope to carry this success through to the Humber River watershed.
RATIONALE
There are many challenges facing Atlantic salmon recovery in the Humber River watershed.
Atlantic salmon splits its life cycle between Lake Ontario and its contributing rivers. Adult
salmon migrate from the lake to the upper watersheds to spawn. Juvenile salmon then spend
one or two years in the rivers before migrating to the lake. These characteristics expose Atlantic
salmon to stressors across a wide variety of urban and rural landscapes. Furthermore, each life
stage has its own set of specific habitat requirements.
Managing these stressors at a watershed scale is complicated by land ownership, municipal
jurisdiction and competing restoration strategies. The Humber River watershed is a complex
mix of public and private land. The success of the program relies on both public and private
support, therefore there must be a common message and shared approach to restoration
efforts.
Funding to target aquatic restoration is always limited; ensuring resources are applied to the
most strategic projects is very important. Opportunities to partner and to coordinate
restorations efforts are essential to ensure that financial resources are effectively applied and to
pool resources for the greatest benefit.
346
The projects to be done under the Atlantic salmon program will contribute to the goals of
TRCA's Humber River Fisheries Management Plan and the Humber River Watershed Plan.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
TRCA plans to continue its partnership with MNR and OFAH in regard to projects, information
sharing and targeting restoration work. Taken together, this partnership maximizes chances for
successful Atlantic salmon habitat restoration.
Restoration opportunity plans are already complete for large portions of the upper Humber
River. Segments of the watercourses have been identified by OFAH and MNR as important for
specific Atlantic salmon life stages (spawning, nursery/rearing) and for headwater thermal
mitigation. Functional priority reaches are primarily located on the main branch of the Humber
River, upstream of Nashville Road. Nashville Tract, Albion Hills Conservation Area, and
Palgrave Forest and Wildlife Area and surrounding area, and Bolton Tract have been assessed.
These proposed works will create an inventory of restoration opportunities that can be
implemented as multi-year initiatives in the next five years.
Subject to funding, Atlantic salmon restoration in the Humber River watershed will proceed in
the following manner:
1. Information Sharing: Continued efforts to share existing data and information with
partners will maximize multiple benefits of restoration planning. New information will be
shared as it is collected by the partners.
2. Viability of the Lower Humber: Restoration efforts in the Upper Humber River must be
complemented by an accessible and passable Lower Humber River for incoming adult
and outgoing juvenile salmon. Assessment of barriers and infrastructure for this urban
section of river is ongoing.
3. Implementation: Initial restoration projects spear-headed by TRCA will focus on
TRCA-owned property and municipal lands.
4. Private Landowners: While public lands are more readily accessible for implementation,
private landowners will be contacted in priority reaches to inform them of possible
contributions to the restoration efforts. Landowner contact will be coordinated between
key agencies and NGOs.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding is provided from both traditional and nontraditional sources. The traditional sources
originate through the capital budget process from City of Toronto, Region of Peel and Region of
York. However, habitat restoration projects are also supported from a variety of nontraditional
sources and partners. OFAH is providing staff and resources, and have received funding from
the LCBO, Ontario Power Generation, TD Friends of the Environment Foundation and the
Ontario Wildlife Foundation.
347
Funds are available in the following approved 2013 budgets: 129-39, 112-72, 129-37 and
129-38. In 2013 and 2014, TRCA expects to complete eight projects that contribute to the
strategic Atlantic salmon program. These include three hectares of wetland restoration, two
kilometres of stream restoration, and the removal of one barrier to fish passage for an estimated
cost of$405,000.
Report prepared by: Ralph Toninger, extension 5366; Craig Losos, extension 5654
Emails: rtoninger@trca.on.ca, closos @trca.on.ca
For information contact: Ralph Toninger, extension 5366
Emails: rtoninger@trca.on.ca
Date: September 17, 2013
RES.#A141/13 - CITY OF TORONTO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND
CLEAN-OUT PARTNERSHIP
Commence stormwater management pond clean-out program in
partnership with the City of Toronto.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Deb Schulte
THAT approval be granted for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to
enter into a partnership with the City of Toronto for the delivery of a Stormwater
Management Pond Maintenance and Clean-out Program;
THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take any action necessary to implement
the partnership including obtaining any required approvals and the signing and execution
of documents;
THAT approval be granted for TRCA to implement two stormwater management pond
plans in 2013;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back regularly on the progress of the project.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The City of Toronto is estimated to have approximately 63 stormwater management ponds
(SWMPs) under its management. The creation of SWMPs proliferated in the 1990s, and there
has been significant research and improvements made to their design and function. However,
the management and maintenance of SWMPs has become a growing concern as the cost and
technical feasibility of maintaining them is highly variable. Many of the SWMPs under the City of
Toronto's management have never been maintained or dredged, and many are nearing or have
reached their maximum sediment capacity. This reduces a SWMPs capability to hold and treat
stormwater, thereby protecting the surrounding areas from localized flooding and improving
downstream water quality. SWMPs require regular maintenance and sediment removal in order
to operate effectively.
348
In the spring of 2013, the operations division of City of Toronto Water approached TRCA's
Restoration Services Division (RSD) to seek opportunities for TRCA to assist with the
management of their SWMPs.
The priority ponds that were identified by the City were:
• L'Amoreaux Pond (Upper);
• Centennial Pond;
• Sisters of St. Joseph Pond;
• Lansing Pond;
• Spring Creek Ponds (Upper and Lower).
After further consultation between the City of Toronto and TRCA, two more ponds were added
to the list:
• Lower Duck Pond;
• Wendigo Pond.
Four of the ponds are located in Scarborough: L'Amoreaux, Centennial, Sisters of St. Joseph
and Lansing. The other three are located inside High Park: Upper and Lower Spring Creek,
Lower Duck and Wendigo.
City staff subsequently asked RSD, in a letter dated May 23, 2013, to complete a stormwater
pond maintenance and clean-out plan for each of the seven ponds. To accomplish this, the City
has allocated $20,000 per pond. A Stormwater Pond Maintenance and Clean-out Plan includes
the following:
• assessment of background information and current site conditions;
• detailed survey and sediment investigation;
• clean-out options and retrofit assessment;
• detailed costing and implementation phasing.
Initial analyses and site visits commenced in June 2013. Work continued in July and August
2013 with sediment quality testing and the writing of the pond maintenance and clean-out
plans. In September 2013, staff developed concept designs for the implementation of
clean-outs at Sisters of St. Joseph Pond and Lansing Pond.
Toronto Water has reviewed the Stormwater Pond Maintenance and Clean-out Plans prepared
by RSD, and is in the process of approving the pond clean-out projects for Sisters of St. Joseph
Pond and Lansing Pond. Once approval is received, TRCA staff will mobilize the work crews to
commence the work. TRCA staff determined that the most effective dredging method for these
two ponds was mechanical excavation. Alternative technologies may be considered if they are
suitable for the other five SWMPs.
The first pond that will be cleaned out is Sisters of St. Joseph, which is located northwest of the
intersection of St. Clair Avenue East and Warden Avenue in Scarborough. Depending on
weather conditions, TRCA also expects to clean out Lansing Pond before the end of 2013.
Lansing is located off of William Kitchen Road, southeast of the intersection of Highway 401 and
Kennedy Road in Scarborough.
349
RATIONALE
TRCA has identified SWMPs as an integral component of water resources management within
the TRCA jurisdiction. SWMPs improve water quality and provide flood and erosion control
within TRCA's watersheds.
Dredging these SWMPs will ensure they continue to provide the surrounding areas with
effective flood control and water quality management. The first two ponds scheduled to be
cleaned out are Sisters of St. Joseph and Lansing, and they are currently at capacity for
sediment volume. Without regular maintenance (i.e., dredging), the ponds cannot continue to
provide flood control and water quality management as designed.
TRCA has discussed the maintenance and management of SWMPs with various partner
municipalities and agencies. It is agreed that there is an immediate need to showcase the
feasibility and benefits of routine pond maintenance and the practical construction techniques.
Many of the SWMPs across TRCA's jurisdiction are now reaching their design capacities and
are in need of maintenance. To date, there are very few good examples of pond maintenance in
TRCA's jurisdiction. Further, it is estimated that there are over 800 SWMPs within the City of
Toronto, and York, Peel and Durham regions, with another 100 planned in the future to support
proposed new development. This is a significant opportunity for TRCA to work with its partner
municipalities to promote TRCA's programs and watershed management expertise.
RSD, in undertaking this endeavor, is working with TRCA's stormwater management team and
the multi-agency initiative led by TRCA called Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program
(STEP). One of STEP's goals is to monitor and evaluate clean water technologies. The STEP
program intends to complete a case study around Sisters of St. Joseph or Lansing Pond and
present it in a 2014 workshop on stormwater pond management.
The management of SWMPs is consistent with the TRCA's Strategic Plan, specifically: priority
strategy #2 manage our regional water resources for current and future generations, and
strategy #7 build partnerships and new business models.
The opportunity to work with the operations division of City of Toronto Water allows us to
promote TRCA's current pond management techniques, provides a cost effective option for our
partner municipality, and allows TRCA and STEP to advance the science and best
management options for SWMPs.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The first two ponds, Sisters of St. Joseph and Lansing, are expected to be completed in 2013.
Both ponds will be dredged mechanically and the sites will be restored afterward.
Dredging is tentatively scheduled to commence on Sisters of St. Joseph Pond in the fall of
2013, upon receipt of all approvals and the availability of resources. TRCA will work with City
staff and the local Councillors to develop a public engagement process. The ponds will each be
de-watered during the dredging and managed to ensure the operation of the pond is
maintained to provide downstream benefits.
350
The method of sediment disposal depends on the contamination levels of the sediment. It is
expected that the sediment will be dried on-site and then disposed of off-site. A Request for
Quotation will determine which contractor(s) is/are chosen for sediment disposal. Only
contractors operating under a Ministry of the Environment Certificate of Approval are eligible to
undertake the disposal of the sediment.
Work will begin in 2014 on the public consultation process for the High Park ponds: Wendigo,
Upper and Lower Spring Creek, and Lower Duck. While some SWMPs are in isolated areas, it is
recognized that High Park is a well-used area with many interested stakeholder groups. Public
consultation will be key in planning the clean-out of the High Park ponds.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The maintenance and clean-out plans are being completed by TRCA staff for a cost of$20,000
for each pond. The cost to clean out each pond may vary greatly, because disposal costs
depend heavily on the levels of contamination found within each pond. The funding for the
pond clean-out and maintenance will be 100% recoverable from the City of Toronto within
account 113-20, and is estimated to cost$740,000 for the two priority ponds, Sisters of St.
Joseph and Lansing.
Report prepared by: Ralph Toninger, extension 5366
Emails: rtoninger@trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Ralph Toninger, extension 5366
Emails: rtoninger@trca.on.ca
Date: September 11, 2013
RES.#A142/13 - FRENCHMAN'S BAY HARBOUR ENTRANCE RECONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
Contract RSD13-100. Award of Contract RSD13-100 for dredging works
of the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Channel, City of Pickering,
Region of Durham.
Moved by: Maria Augimeri
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT Contract RSD13-100 for the channel maintenance dredging of Frenchman's Bay
Harbour Entrance Channel be awarded to Galcon Marine Ltd. for the total cost not to
exceed $234,300.00, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that best meets Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;
THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of
$23,430.00 as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;
351
THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded
contractor, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the
other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting
TRCA specifications;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such action as is
necessary to implement the contract, including obtaining any required approvals and the
signing and execution of documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 2008, the City of Pickering working in partnership with TRCA, initiated the Frenchman's Bay
Harbour Entrance Class Environmental Assessment (EA). The purpose of this undertaking is to
create a safe harbour entrance that supports the marine function of the embayment, while
preserving or enhancing the ecological conditions. Through the EA process, the preferred
design was selected and consisted of two breakwater structures running perpendicular from
the east and west spits of the harbour entrance. Incorporated into these improvements was the
dredging of material within the channel to ensure safe navigability.
Ongoing sediment deposition within the harbour channel continues to pose navigational
obstacles for boats as the channel currently does not meet the minimum standard
requirements to allow for safe navigation. The removal of 11,500 cubic metres of estimated
dredged material is required to provide sufficient depths that will create a safe and navigable
channel for three to five years between Lake Ontario and Frenchman's Bay.
RATIONALE
Tender RSD13-100 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo(
http://www.biddingo.com/) on Monday, August 19, 2013 with a mandatory site information
meeting held on Thursday, August 22, 2013. Tender packages were sent to 19 contractors as
follows:
• Alloa Excavating;
• Alpeza General Contracting;
• ASI Group Ltd.;
• Catalina Excavating Inc.;
• Dean Construction Company Ltd;
• Dragage Ocean DSM Inc.;
• Elirpa Construction & Materials Ltd.;
• Facca Inc.;
• Galcon Marine Ltd;
• GFL Excavating Corp;
• Golden Gate Contracting;
• Great lakes offshore services Inc.;
• Mcpherson Andrews;
• Metric Contracting Services Company;
• Ontario Construction;
• Richardson Workboats;
• Somerville Construction;
• Terrafix Geosynthetics Inc.; and
• The Cedarbrook Group Inc.
352
The Procurement Opening Committee opened the tenders on Friday, August 30th, 2013 with
the following results:
Contract RSD13-100- Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Channel Dredging
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
BIDDERS UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE TENDER
(Mobilization/ (Dredging) AMOUNT
Demobilization) (Plus HST)
Galcon Marine $20,400.00 $15.10 $234,300.00
Ontario Construction Company Ltd. $48,990.00 $26.55 $429,640.00
Catalina Excavating Inc. $18,900.00 $30.90 $430,600.00
Dean Construction Company Ltd. $46,500.00 $27.50 $454,750.00
Restoration Services staff reviewed the bid received from Galcon Marine Ltd. against its own
cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the
requirements and deliverables as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by
TRCA staff of Galcon Marine Ltd.'s experience and ability to undertake similar projects was
conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that Galcon Marine
Ltd. is capable of undertaking the scope of work.
Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Galcon Marine Ltd. be awarded Contract
RSD13-100 for the supply of all labour, materials and equipment necessary for channel
maintenance dredging of Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance for a total amount not to exceed
$234,300.00, plus a contingency amount of$23,430.00 to be expended as authorized by TRCA
staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specification.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds to undertake the Frenchman's Bay Harbour Entrance Project are 100% recoverable from
the City of Pickering, further to the Memorandum of Understanding.
Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 416-786-5128
Emails: mguy @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702
Emails: jdickie @trca.on.ca
Date: September 09, 2013
RES.#A143/13 - BRUCE'S MILL DRIVING RANGE
Grading and Filling. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
proposes to enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of
York to strategically place and grade up to 140,000 cubic metres of clean
surplus soil on TRCA-owned tablelands located within Bruce's Mill
Conservation Area, Township of Whitchurch-Stouffville.
353
Moved by: Jack Heath
Seconded by: Deb Schulte
WHEREAS the driving range has been identified as a potential site for enhancement
through the placing of fill, and was approved as a possible site in a report to the Authority
(Resolution #A142/08);
AND WHEREAS the Bruce's Mill Master Plan recommends a landscape plan tailored to
the recreation use for the area (Resolution #A239/11);
AND WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Parks staff has
identified the existing driving range as the preferred recreational use;
AND WHEREAS TRCA is advocating the sustainable reuse of clean soil;
AND WHEREAS TRCA has been directed to enter into negotiations with its regional
partners to provide suitable locations to reuse clean soil in a sustainable manner on
conservation lands to create, protect and enhance restoration and habitat features
(Resolution #A218/12);
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of York to accept placement of up
to 140,000 cubic metres of clean surplus soil on TRCA-owned table lands within Bruce's
Mill Conservation Area to enhance the existing driving range facility, subject to
archaeological, regional and municipal approvals;
THAT the fee for accepting the soil will be $5.50 per cubic metre (m3);
THAT, in addition to the tipping fee, the Regional Municipality of York will be responsible
for all costs of sediment control, placing soil, fine grading and seeding the site with a
basic cover crop;
THAT the funds received as compensation for receiving the surplus soil be set aside
exclusively for project costs, for future restoration and habitat enhancement of the
property and associated TRCA purposes;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all the necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Bruce's Mill Conservation Area (BMCA) is 108 hectares of rolling hills and creeks located in
the western part of the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville. The park is on the southern edge of the
Oak Ridges Moraine and boasts more than 70 hectares of wetlands, forests and meadows. In
addition to providing valuable habitat to wetlands and forest species alike, it has the potential to
be a prime tourist destination for local and regional visitors to enjoy nature-based recreation
opportunities.
354
BMCA hosts a variety of nature-based recreational activities including hiking and picnicking.
There are also several lease agreements for activities occurring on BMCA lands, including
soccer, and agricultural uses. Additionally, the conservation area hosts a yearly maple syrup
festival and an annual York Children's Water Festival in partnership with York Region. TRCA
has also entered into a long term lease arrangement with the Regional Municipality of York
(Community Safety Village of York Region) for lands situated within the Bruce's Mill
Conservation Area.
At Authority Meeting #10/11, held on November 25, 2011, the BMCA Master Plan was
approved (Resolution A#239/11). Included in the public use and recreation plan are several
opportunities to implement revenue-generating fill projects. A summary of these projects was
presented to TRCA senior staff on April 3, 2008. One of the projects that was endorsed as part
of that summary was the driving range project in the northeast corner of Bruce's Mill
Conservation Area. As part of the master plan process, the driving range has been targeted for
restoration and active public recreation use.
TRCA staff has completed a concept design drawing illustrating how the driving range will be
enhanced by importing and strategically placing clean surplus fill. It is the opinion of staff that
this is an opportunity to revitalize the driving range so that it will become a viable choice for
people looking for a place to practice and learn the game of golf in an eco-friendly
environment. The facility will be developed into a coaching/teaching facility that will provide
excellence in every aspect of the game. A junior golf camp will be introduced during the
summer months, with the focus on health, nutrition and the environment while learning all the
different aspects of the game of golf.
The driving range enhancement project has been presented at the BMCA sub-committee
meeting, as well as at a public meeting. Additionally, staff and the advisory committee have
had the opportunity to review and comment on the concept design drawing for the site. TRCA
staff anticipate the filling and grading component of the project will be completed within two
years.
TRCA will enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of York to supply, place and
grade clean surplus soil required to complete the driving range design. In addition, the Region
will provide compensation to TRCA which will offset project costs and future costs associated
with the management of the property. TRCA will implement a fill quality control program to
ensure and confirm that all soil placed on TRCA-owned property meets Ministry of the
Environment Residential Parkland criteria.
TRCA Archaeology staff has completed the assessment of the site and it is now cleared from an
archaeological perspective and ready for fill placement.
355
RATIONALE
TRCA staff has completed similar projects in other areas with considerable success. Examples
of these successful projects include: the recently completed berm on Kortright Centre for
Conservation tablelands off Pine Valley Drive; Boyd North Pit rehabilitation off Rutherford Road;
berming along Intermodal Drive and Highway 407 within Claireville Conservation Area; the
berming along the new Markham By-Pass east of Ninth Line; and, berming and wetland
complex development at Boyd North (along Islington Avenue north of Rutherford Road) and a
habitat enhancement project known as Kleinburg New Forest North located at Regional Road
27 and Islington Avenue in Kleinburg.
The proposed project is consistent with the recommendations of the approved Master Plan for
the property and there is general public consensus for the restoration and recreational use on
the site. Staff see this work as a benefit to all involved as the surplus soil along with the financial
compensation will cover the cost to successfully implement this project.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Subject to project approval, TRCA staff will complete an agreement with the Regional
Municipality of York to supply and place the required fill. TRCA staff also needs to obtain
various municipal and regional approvals.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
TRCA staff anticipates revenue of up to$770,000 from this project. Revenue will offset direct
project operating and restoration costs.
Report prepared by: David Hatton, extension 5365
Emails: dhatton @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: David Hatton, extension 5365
Emails: dhatton @trca.on.ca
Date: September 04, 2013
Attachments: 1
356
Attachment 1
‘ 1 1 /
\ 1 i
N"... \ )
I
ef
\ \ 1) \
/
Nte )
Ikfte,.....
/ vsea-',-e-fr
\ 4...... „co 7 of fill to be
pti
4e'S
\ 1
1
\ .
1 '
ifi Itn,t' \ Bruce's Mill
) .1.
,..„ Conservation
i
oe .......1 /
)
\j 1
\is,.
. \ \, .
V)
... .-....-
-‘40
...."..........1,-04. iri..
....‘
,+,......,
I*.ei....
N
\ Ti
)
1 ' i
i
.4....,-, . .
Legend pwTh,,I.h.k.+.r.4.Lty ..,.,.PEEL
L 1 Regulation Limit
, ._ k,r, .,, TORONTO
T RCA Property -,.... , , ,,,,„,,
3 E0 13C 20C 30C 4C-3 ,.,
Meters ..
..,,,
Key Map
t Queer s P-nter4v 0 131O-NYC Its Itcensz-s :Z0051 M ay Not to Rep-ocli.oec eatiov.D ermIsE on. THIS1 IS rdOT A F-AN OF 0J9VEv
357
RES.#A144/13 - AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Professional Access and Integration Enhancement Program
and Mentoring to Placement Program. The PATE and M2P audited
financial statements for the period April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013 (PATE)
and December 1, 2011 to March 31, 2013 (M2P) are presented for
Authority approval.
Moved by: Maria Augimeri
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT the Professional Access and Integration Enhancement Program
(PATE) and Mentoring to Placement Program (M2P) audited financial statements as
presented, be approved and signed by the Chair, Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA), in accordance with the Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration
Bridging Projects - Project Audit Guidelines.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Funded by the Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration (MCI), TRCA has been delivering the
PATE and M2P Ontario bridge training programs since 2006 to assist internationally trained
professionals to access training, licensing and employment opportunities in their field within the
environmental sector. As part of its project audit guidelines, MCI requires Authority approval of
PATE and M2P financial statements, as attached, as verification that the financial information in
the audit reports are complete and accurate.
The accounting firm of Grant Thornton LLP, has completed its audits. The audited financial
statements are presented as Attachments 1 and 2 (PATE), 3 and 4 (M2P).
RATIONALE
The approval of the Statement of Revenue and Expenditures attests to the following:
• project funding has been solely applied to costs directly related to the project;
• deferred revenue refers to receipt of cash in advance of rendering a good or service and
while initially recorded as cash coming in, is also a liability because the organization has an
obligation;
• funding and/or expenditures from other sources, not directly related to this project, have not
been included in the report;
• reported expenditure is net of HST rebates;
• shared costs have been properly apportioned to the project;
• the project bears full responsibility for absorbing any project deficits;
• project funds that were provided to the project prior to their immediate need were
maintained in an interest-bearing account; and
• interest earned on project funding has been credited to the project.
358
The Authority is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its responsibilities for financial
reporting and is ultimately responsible for reviewing and approving the financial statements.
Report prepared by: Marisa Iorfido-Sdao, extension 5582
Emails: miorfida-sdao @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232
Emails: rsgambelluri@trca.on.ca
Date: August 28, 2013
Attachments: 4
359
Attachment 1
Grant Thornton
Statement of Revenue and Expendimies
Professional Access and Integration Enhancement
Program
(A Program of Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority)
Year ended March 31, 2013
360
Contents
Page
Independent Auditor's Report 1
Statement of Revenue and Expend tires 2
Notes to the Statement of Revenue and Expenditures 3-4
361
„.„
Grant Thornton
Independent Auditor's Report
?.;rant Thornton LP
sthe
it ksat Palmy
usoram,cis
mks
2L16)366-C,150
935)475-M3h
yne.m.srarrnrox.ca
To the Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration
We Have audited the statement of revenue and expenditures Sthtement"I for the
Professiona Access and Integration Ea cement-Program of the Toronto and Region
Conservation Airthotr for the year ended Match 31,2013 The Statement has been
prepared by management in accordance with the Audit and AccolintabilitT GuideL-ies
for Ontario BrLdge Tiaimng Pro,ects from the IfinL'str-y of Citizenship and
Immigration.
Management's Responsibility for the Statement
Management is re sponsib:e for the preparation of the Statement in accordance with the Audit and
Accountty Guidelines for Ontario Bridge Training 1pro,ects from the IfinistiT of Cftitensa_p and
Immigration and for such interna control as management cletern,_ines is necessary to enable the
preparation of the Statement that is free from mateaL n,_isstateinent,whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Statement based on our audit.We conducted our
audit in accordance with Canachan generally accepted auditLag standards.Those standards requite
that we comply with ethicL requirements and plan and perform the aucLt to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the Statement is free from naateal misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures
in the Statement.The procedures selected depend on the auditor's ludgmentinc:uchag the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the Statement,whether disc to fraud or error. In
ina."-ing those rish assessments,the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's
preparation of the Statement in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
czscumstances,but not for the purpose of expressing opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's
intemL control.An audit also includes eva.:alating the appropriateness of accounting polices used and
the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management,as we:as evaluating the overaL
presentation of the Statement.
We beL:eve that the audit evidence we Have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for our aucLt opinion.
362
GrantThornton
Opinion
In our opinion, the statement of revenue and expenclibires for the Professional Access and
Integration Enhancement'Program of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.for.the year
ended March 31,2013 prepared.in all material respects,in accordance with the Audit and
Accountability GuideLLnes for Ontario B.ridge Thining Projects from the 7:,..1nstiT of Citt.zenship
and Iminigrauon.
Basis of Accounting and Restriction on Distribution and Use
Without moclLfy=ig our opinion,we thaw attention to Note 2 to the Statement which describes the
basis of accounting The Statement is prepared to assist Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority to meet the ErnancLal reporting requirements of the MinistrT of Cit2ensltp and
Immigration. As a resn:t,the Statement may not be suitable for another piirpose. Our report is
intended solely for Toronto and Region Conservation AnthoritT and the Ministry of Cititenship
and Iininigrauon and should not be distributed to or used by parties other than Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority and the Ministry of Citizenship
iip
Markham,Ontario Chartered Accountants
August 6,2013 Licensed Pub".,x Accountants
363
Professional Access and Integration Enhancement
Program
(A Project of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority)
Statement of Revenue and Expenditures
Year ended March 31 2013
Revenue
Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration grant $ 342,002
Interest 2,804
Revenue from program and application fees 14.586
359.392
Program costs
Salaries and benefits 330,023
Marketing and communications 1,289
Training materials and office supplies 513
Technical training and supplementary workshops 2,285
Recognition, conferences and staff development 1,199
Canadian Language benchmark assessments 140
335,449
Administrative costs
TRCA surcharge 13,807
Computer equipment 1,257
Communications 2,472
Travel, meetings and consultations 3,084
Facility rentals 305
Audit 2,4-42
Other general administrative costs 576
23,943
Total expenditures 359.392
Excess of revenue over expenditures -
See accompanying notes to the statement of revenue and expenditures 3
364
Professional Access and Integration Enhancement
Program
(A P ject of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority)
Notes to the Statement of Revenue and Expenditures
Year ended March.31. 2O13
1. Nature of operations
This financial statement pertains to the Professional Access and Integration Enhancement
Program (`P4|E^} administered under the Funding Agreement issued by the Ministry ot
C|tizenm:hip and Immigration and Toronto and Region Conservation AuthurKy (^TRCA^)
Accordingly this statement does not include al!the ammets. Uabi|itieo, revenues and expemoeaot
TRCA.
The TRCA is administering the Program on behalf of the Ministrg of Citizenship and
Immigration
2. Significant accounting policies ncI basis of presentation
This financial infomlation has been issued under the name of TRCA.
The Statement of Revenue and Expenditures reflects the operations of the Professional Access
and Integration EmhumoemenL a project of TRCA, and has been prepared by management
based on the Audit and Accountabilly Guidelines for Ontario Bridge Training Projects from the
Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration Costs eligible for reimbursement by the Ministry of
Citizenship and Immigration under the Funding Agreement effective Apt 1, 2010 are eligible
costs that are incurred utter April 1. 2O12 and before March.31. 2O13
The more significant accounting policies with respect to the operating statement are as follows:
Accrual accounting
The accrua basis of accounting is used to record expenditures in the period in which costs are
incurred and to recognize revenie in the year in which.it is earned
RevmnueroomAn|r|on
Grant revenues are deferred and recognized as revenue Wren the reiated program eKpense is
incurred
Vehicles and equipment
ntemaI charges for the use of the vehcles and eQuipment are made to the varioLls projects ana
programs of TRCA and are included in the applicable eKpenditure categories
In-kind contributions
In accordance with the agreement for the funding with respect to this program. no in-kind
contributions have been included in this schedule
4
365
Professional Access and Integration Enhancement
Program
to Project of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority)
Notes to the Statement of Revenue and Expenditures
Year ended March 31, 2013
2. Significant accounting policies and basis of presentation (continued
Use of estimates
in preparing the Programs financial statements, management is required to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the disclosure of contingent assets and habilities at the date of the
financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and disbursements during the period.
Actual results could differ from these estimates
3. Related party transactions
Under the terms of the Funding Agreement, TRCA charged 513,807 during the year ended
March 31, 2013 for project overhead and administration costs with respect to the administration
of the Program
5
366
Attachment 2
Audit and Accountability Guidelines for Ontario Bridge Training Projects
APPENDIX IV:
LABOUR MARKET INTEGRATION UNIT STATEMENT OF
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE TEMPLATE
FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD FROM(xryni m(pi ml 2D12.04/01To2n1sosal
(Please refer to your 8oM*dul-eB for the Reporting Period)
Organization Name: Toronto and Rea ion Con,enmtion4umorm//TRcA)
Organization contact: m.F.7.,n |crfFL7-5.cno
Pwo|tion: Senior Manager Volunteerism&oivcrmti Telephone W:
Project Name: PAIEPmoram
PROJECT REVEWUEk0
pmvedCon)mw�Funding fmmPreWouaRepo�ngPeUoU$! � 3O2�S4G
$2O5�OOO
Ministry m
yFunU|ng� auU�peUoUoaperSchedu�B(2O12 2013�
|�ene�EamedonM|n|a�yFunding �2.8O4
Revenue8nmPmg�m�4ppUua�ononU��Umhopfeea $ 14.58G
To�| Rwvonuo��tMouuU� pork�uopor8oM*du� B�2012 2013) (A) SS2533@
'
PROJECT EXPENDITURE Bq
| | |
Total Expenditure CB) | $ 359,392
DEFERREDREyEWUEM
Deterred Revenue torAudit period as per Schedule B(201 2-2013 (C) 165'944
�
UNALLOCATED(4:11
---- ---- | -
T
� Unopwnt{unding 0> | |
|verify that the ZI bovvnnano|v|information|moonect mnmthat:
• Project funding has been uo|vlyapplied to costs directly related to the Project;
• Funding mnm/orewpvnditu,ea from other sources,notm|n,nm, related to this project,have not
been included in the Report;
•
Reported expenditure i net of H ST rebte ;
•
Sh red costs have been properly apportioned to the Project;
• The Project bears full n,uponu|bmmm,auuo,b|nn any pro]vctmvncmo/
• Project,undathat were provided to the Project prior to their|m memiam,need were maintained |n
Zln interest-bearing account;and
•
Intereteamed on Pro j.ectfunding h been credfted to the Project
zme rt ify that the information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and claimed in
mcco"dmncethee ridge Train mmAgreement.
Signature of Age n Sig n| oAuthmvuv Date
Na me:Gerri Lynn O'Connor
rule:chmir
I have authority to bind the Redpient 14
367
Attachment 3
GrantThornton
Statement of Revenue and Expenditures
Mentoring to Placement for Environmental
Professionals Program
(A Program of Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority)
Sixteen month period ended March 31, 2013
368
Contents
Page
Independent Auditor's Report 1 -2
Statement of Revenue and Expend M.ires 3
Notes to the Statement of Revenue and Expenditures 4-5
369
Grant Thornton
Independent Auditor's Report
,Srard Thornton[17--
51.,b 20C
15 ik me Forkuoy
.1.4
T[416; 5&-C15
SC5 475-EM
vivive.2431Thornzalca
To the Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration
77e hare audited the statement of rerenue and expenditures ne Statemenr for the Menton-rig to
Placement for EntrlEC,f1/11eilt11:Professionals Program of the Toronto and Region Consermtion
A/idiom7(I-RCA for the penod from December 1,2011 to March 31.2013 The Statement has
been prepared bv management in accordance with the Andt and Accountabilitt-Guidelines for
Ontario Badge Training Pro.ects from the Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration.
Management's Responsibility for the Statement
Management irs responsible for the preparation of the Statement in accordance with the And and
..-‘ccountabilitT Guidelines for Ontario Bridge Training Pro'ects from the IL:lists-of Citi.tenship
and Immigration and for such internal control as management determines is V.ecesscuT to enable
the preparation of the Statement that a Lee from material misstatement,whether due to fraud or
error
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibilitr is to express an opinion on the Statement based on our audit. 7.74 conducted our
audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted and standards.Those standards requlirre
that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the Statement is free from material ni:sstatement.
An audit=aro:yes performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and
disclosures in the Statement.The procedures selected depend on the andi.tor's ,ricignarent,including
the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the Statement.whether due to fraud or
error.In making those iris:::assessments,the auditor considers interall:control relevant to the
entitrs preparation of the Statement in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances,but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entires
internal control.An arkilt aho Inch-ides evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used.
and the reasonableness of accounLiag estimates made b7 management,as we as evaluating tire
=era:presentation of the Statement.
e believe that the audit evidence we hare obtained ir sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our audit opinion.
370
Grant Thornton
Opinion
Ii o7i,c opinion,the statement of Yererme and erpencLtgres for the Mentoring to Placement for
En7:sonariental Professionalo Progrma of the'Toronto and Region Conservation Anthorin-for the
period from December 1,2.011 to March 31.is prepared,in al:material respects,in accordance with
the Anclit and A cconntabilirr GraideLnes for altftr:O.Bridge Tra..--nng Pro,ects from the IL:not/7
of Cin.t.enship and Luinigration.
Basis of Accounting and Restriction on Distribution and Use
ithont modifying our opinion,we draw attention to Note 2 to the Statement which describes the
basis of accorimang. The Statement is prepared to assist Toronto and Region Conservation
Amthonrs to meet the financial reporting regri„.:sernento of the Iiinistt7 of Cititrenship and
Iimi.gration.As a revilt. the Statement man not he sTutable for another p!upose.0=ir report is
intended solely for Toronto and Region Conserration Anthoritr and the hEmotr7 of Citizenship
and Immigration and slaortld not be distributed to or nsed br parties other than Toronto and
Region Conservation And:loam and the Ministry-of Citizenship
11/2
Markham.Ontario Chartered Accolmtanto
Angmst S,2.013 Licensed Thsblic Acconntants
2
371
Mentoring to Placement for Environmental Professionals
Program
(A Project of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority)
Statement of Revenue and Expenditures
Sixteen month penod ended March 31 2013
Revenue
M in istry of Citizenship and Immigration grant 518,788
Interest 637
519,425
Program costs
Salaries and benefits 431,773
Technical and soft skills workshops 5,046
Multicultural business solutions and business writing workshops 8,446
Jewish Vocational Services and ACCES Employment
Services—training workshops 26,708
Networking events 1,055
473,028
Administrative costs
TROA surcharge 24,734
Computer equipment 3,224
Communications 3,379
Bus and Facility rentals 1,620
Marketing materials and printing 3,510
Staff development 2,674
Language assessment 333
Travel and meals meetings and consultations 3,317
Audit fees 2,351
Other general administrative costs 1,255
46.397
Total expenditures 519,425
Excess of revenue over expenditures -
See accompanying notes to the statement of revenue and expenditures
3
372
Mentoring to Placement for Environmental Professionals
Program
(A Project of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority)
Notes to the Statement of Revenue and Expenditures
Sixteen month period ended March 31,2013
1. Nature of operations
This financial statement pertains to the Mentoring to Placement for Environmental
Professionals Program ("M2P') administered under the Funding Agreement issued by the
Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
("TRCA') Accordingly this statement does not include all the assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses of TRCA.
The TRCA is administering the Program on behalf of the Ministry of Citizenship and
Immigration
2. Significant accounting policies and basis of presentation
This financial information has been issued under the name of TRCA.
The statement of revenue and expenditures reflects the operations of Mentoring to Placement
for Environmental Professionals, a project of TRCA, and has been prepared by management
based on the Audit and Accountability Guidelines for Ontario Bridge Training Proiects from the
Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration Costs eligaale for reimbursement by the Ministry of
Citizenship and Immigration under the Funding Agreement effective December 1, 2011 are
eligible costs that are incurred after December 1, 2011 and before March 31, 2013
The more significant accounting policies with respect to the operating statement are as foliows:
Accrual accounting
The accrual basis of accounting is used to record expenditures in the period in which costs are
incurred and to recognize revenue in the year in which it is earned
Revenue recognition
Grant revenues are deferred and recognized as revenue when the related program expense is
incurred
Vehicles and equipment
Internal charges for the use of the vehicles and equipment are made to the various projects and
programs of TRCA and are included in the applicable expenditure categories
In-kind contributions
In accordance with the agreement for the funding with respect to this program, no in-kind
contributions have been included in this schedule
4
373
Mentoring to Placement for Environmental Professionals
Program (A Project of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority)
Notes to the Statement of Revenue and Expenditures
Sixteen month period ended March 31,2013
2. Significant accounting policies and basis of presentation (continued)
Use of estimates
In preparing the Program's financial statements, management is required to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statement and reported amounts of revenue and eKpenditures during the period
Actual results could differ from these estimates
3. Related party transactions
Under the terms of the Funding Agreement. TRCA charged S24,734 during the sixteen month
penod ended March 31. 2013 for project overhead and administration costs with respect to the
administration of the Program
5
374
Attachment 4
Audit and Accountability Guidelines for Ontario Bridge Training Projects
APPENDIX IV:
LABOUR MARKET INTEGRATION UNIT STATEMENT OF
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE TEMPLATE
FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD FROM(Mi.Ynim.(04) 2D11112/DiTO 20131:131
(Please refer to your Schedule B for the Reporting Period)
Organization Name: Toronto and R ea ion Conservation Authority CIRCA)
Organization contact: M.F.,sz Icrfc_F.-Eczc
POSitiCiril Senior Manager Volunteerism&Div ersiti Telephone W: -;c•
Project Name: 1%•Iento ri no to Placement ilM2P)for F nv irrinm Frith I PrrifFs sinna I s
PROJECT REVEN U E{a)
Approved Carryover Funding from Previous Reporting Period(s)
Ministry Funding for audit period as per Schedule B(2011 -2013) $ 535,7981
Interest Earned on Ministry Funding $ 631
Total Revenue forthe audit period as per Schedule B(2011 -2013) (A) $ 536,4351
PROJECT EXPEN D ITU RE(b)
Total Expenditure (B) $ 519,425
DEFERRED REVENUE{C
Deferred Revenue forAudit period as per Schedule B(2011-2013) (C) $ 17,010
UNALLOCATED Kt)
Unspentfunding CE4
I verify that the ZI trove fi na n GiBI information is Go rrect n d that:
• Project funding has been so lely applied to costs directly related to the Project;
• Funding anWorexpenditures from other sources,notdirected related to this project,have not
been included in the Report;
• Reported expenditure is net of HST rebates;
• Shared costs have been properly apportioned to the Project;
• The Project bears full responsibilityforabsorbing any projectdeficit3;
• Project fu n d s that were provided to the Project prior to their i m med iate need were maintained in
Zln interest-bearing account;and
• I nterest ea med on Project fu n d in g has been credited to the Project
Ice rt ify that the information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and claimed in
accorda nce t he B ridge Train ing Agreement.
Signature of Age no;Sig n ing Authority Date
Name:Ge rri Lynn O'Connor
Title:Chair
I have authority to bind the Recipient 14
375
RES.#A145/13 - ONTARIO HERITAGE TRUST, HERITAGE COMMUNITY
RECOGNITION AWARD
Nomination of Rouge Park Trail Volunteers. Approval of nomination of
Rouge Park Trail Volunteers for Ontario Heritage Trust Award.
Moved by: Maria Augimeri
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT the proposal to nominate the Rouge Park Trail Volunteers for a Heritage Community
Recognition award from Ontario Heritage Trust be approved;
THAT the City of Toronto be requested to endorse by a motion of Council the nomination
of the Rouge Park Trail Volunteers.
AND FURTHER THAT Parks Canada be kept informed and updated on the status of the
nomination.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Ontario Heritage Trust's Heritage Community Recognition Program celebrates volunteer
achievements in preserving, protecting and promoting local heritage. Since 1996, the Trust has
worked with communities across the Province of Ontario to recognize 3,200 volunteers for their
contributions to conserving built, cultural and natural heritage.
Those eligible for nomination would be any resident of Ontario, over the age of 18, who has
made outstanding volunteer contributions to their local community in the area of built, cultural
or natural heritage preservation. In addition, the heritage activities must have been provided
without payment.
The types of activities that qualify for nomination in the Natural Heritage category include:
• demonstrated leadership in protecting natural heritage (endangered species habitats,
rare Carolinian forests, wetlands, tall grass prairies, etc.);
• significant natural heritage conservation activities by private landowners;
• outstanding contributions as a volunteer with a local natural heritage organization;
• significant volunteer work at a conservation authority/area or parkland.
Nominations must be endorsed by a motion of a municipal council, regional council, First
Nation band council or Metis community council. A council may submit a maximum of one
nomination for each of the five categories. All nominations that meet the program criteria will be
recognized through the program. The Trust will notify the council of the status of the
nominations before the end of December 2013. If successful, the Trust will provide certificates
and achievement pins for the recipients. It is the responsibility of the council to frame the
certificates. Councils must notify the Trust of local presentations and when possible, the Trust
will send a representative to the community to make the presentation.
376
RATIONALE
The Rouge Park Trail Volunteer Team has been key to the success of the Heritage Appreciation
and Visitor Experience (HAVE) Plan for the Park. Through the team's direct connections with
visitors of all ages, backgrounds and levels of outdoor experience, they are able to share
Rouge Park and TRCA messages, convey best practices by example and through education,
help visitors discover the immense natural and cultural heritage assets found in Rouge Park
(now Rouge National Urban Park).
Rouge Park's guided walks and trail ambassador outreach would be virtually impossible
without these volunteers. Since 2010, the trail volunteer team have collectively delivered 1,121
guided walks to 8,478 park visitors, and made over 1,000 personal contacts with self-guided
visitors on the trail, all the while delivering the primary message of protecting natural heritage in
Rouge Park.
Staff has reviewed this nomination with Parks Canada and received confirmation of their
support.
This nomination, and if successful the award, will significantly recognize the dedicated efforts
and contributions of this trail volunteer team and demonstrate the appreciation from TRCA, the
City of Toronto and Parks Canada.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Staff will complete the following actions:
• send a formal request to the City of Toronto to endorse by a motion of Council the
nomination;
• upon receipt of Council's endorsement, submit the nomination to the Ontario Heritage
Trust;
• inform the Rouge Park Trail Volunteer Team of their nomination;
• if successful, work with City of Toronto to schedule the award presentation and inform the
Ontario Heritage Trust and Parks Canada accordingly.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
There are no financial implications for this nomination.
Report prepared by: Diana Smyth, 647-215-1229
Emails: dsmyth @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Diana Smyth, 647-215-1229 or Mike Bender, extension 5287
Emails: dsmyth @trca.on.ca, mbender @trca.on.ca
Date: August 06, 2013
377
RES.#A146/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed
Glen Rouge Homes (Boydwood), CFN 49663. Purchase of property
located at the rear of 33 Boydwood Lane, City of Toronto - Scarborough
Community Council Area, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for
2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River
watershed.
(Executive Res.#8104/16)
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Chris Fonseca
THAT 1.45 hectares (3.59 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 2,
Concession 2 and designated as Block 8 on a Draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by J. D.
Barnes Ltd., Land Information Specialists, under their Reference No.
11-21-318-00-MP318, dated February 26, 2013, City of Toronto- Scarborough Community
Council Area, located at the rear of 33 Boydwood Lane, be purchased from Glen Rouge
Homes (Boydwood);
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the
lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest
possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A147/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed
King Jane Developments Inc., CFN 49679. Purchase of property located
south of Major Mackenzie Drive, east of Dufferin Street, City of Vaughan,
Regional Municipality of York, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project
for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River
watershed.
(Executive Res.#8105/16)
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Chris Fonseca
378
THAT 5.28 hectares (13.06 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 20,
Concession 2 and designated as Parts 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 on a Draft Plan of Survey
prepared by Rady-Pentek & Edward Surveying Ltd., under their Job No. 12-135, dated
June 17, 2013, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, located south of Major
Mackenzie Drive, east of Dufferin Street, be purchased from King Jane Developments
Inc.;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the
lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest
possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A148/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimico Creek Watershed
Life Construction Inc., CFN 49490. Acquisition of property located at 36
Park Lawn Road in the City of Toronto (formerly the City of Etobicoke),
under the 'Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015', Flood Plain and
Conservation Component, Mimico Creek watershed.
(Executive Res.#8106/16)
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Chris Fonseca
THAT 0.148 hectares (0.366 acres), more or less, of vacant land, being Part of Lot 7,
Registered Plan 83, and designated as Part 4 on Plan 65R-26543, City of Toronto
(formerly the City of Etobicoke), be purchased from Life Construction Inc.;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land
free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land
transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
379
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A149/13 - CITY OF TORONTO
Request for a Land Conveyance for Meadowvale Road
Rouge River Watershed, City of Toronto, CFN 49295. Receipt of a request
from the City of Toronto for a conveyance of lands for Meadowvale Road.
(Executive Res.#8107/16)
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Chris Fonseca
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request
from the City of Toronto to convey certain lands for Meadowvale Road, between
Sheppard Avenue and Old Finch Avenue;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to
cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA owned lands, containing 2.35 hectares
(5.81 acres), more or less, being Part of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3 and designated as
Part 4 on Plan 66R-26703 and Parts 1-16 on Plan 66R-26701, City of Toronto, be conveyed
to the City of Toronto for Meadowvale Road;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of$2.00;
THAT the City of Toronto be responsible for all legal, survey and other costs related to the
land conveyance;
THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify and save harmless TRCA from any and all
claims for injuries, damages or loss of any nature resulting in any way either directly or
indirectly from this sale;
THAT said conveyance is subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may
be required to implement the conveyance agreement, including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documents.
CARRIED
380
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES.#A150/13 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick
THAT Section II items EX8.1 - EX8.6, inclusive, contained in Executive Committee Minutes
#6/13, held on August 9, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
Section II Items EX8.1 - EX8.6. Inclusive
ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD HEARING
(Executive Res.#B87/13)
FRENCHMAN'S BAY HARBOUR ENTRANCE PROJECT EAST BREAKWATER CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT
(Executive Res.#B88/13)
LIMITORQUE ELECTRIC GATE ACTUATORS FOR G. ROSS LORD DAM
(Executive Res.#B89/13)
CLAREMONT FIELD CENTRE
(Executive Res.#B90/13)
RENOVATION OF OFFICE SPACE AT EARTH RANGES
(Executive Res.#B91/13)
BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE VISITOR CENTRE GENERATOR PROJECT
(Executive Res.#B92/13)
RES.#A151/13 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by: Colleen Jordan
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
THAT Section II items EX8.1 - EX8.4, inclusive, contained in Executive Committee Minutes
#7/13, held on September 13, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
Section II Items EX8.1 - EX8.5. Inclusive
MIMICO WATERFRONT LINEAR PARK
(Executive Res.#B108/13)
GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF SLOPE STABILITY
(Executive Res.#B109/13)
ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD HEARING
(Executive Res.#B110/13)
ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD HEARING
(Executive Res.#B 111/13)
381
RES.#A152/13 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Linda Pabst
THAT Section II item EX8.5 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, contained Executive
Committee Minutes #7/13, held on September 13, 2013, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff provide a
report outlining the City of Vaughan Official Plan appeals of concern to the TRCA within
the Woodbridge Core Area, Block 40/47 Peninsula Lands and the Vaughan Metropolitan
Centre to be discussed in camera at the Executive Committee at a future date.
CARRIED
RES.#A153/13 - BLACK CREEK CHANNEL DREDGING
Moved by: Maria Augimeri
Seconded by: Dave Ryan
THAT item EX11 - Black Creek Channel Dredging, contained Executive Committee
Minutes #7/13, held on September 13, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
RES.#A154/13 - WATERSHED COUNCIL MINUTES
Moved by: Glenn Mason
Seconded by: Jim Tovey
THAT Section IV item AUTH8.1 -Watershed Committee Minutes, be received.
CARRIED
Section IV Item EX8.1
HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE
Minutes of Meeting #3/13, held on June 18, 2013.
RES.#A155/13 - SECTION IV- ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Linda Pabst
382
THAT Section IV item EX9.1 - Black Creek Historic Brewery, contained in Executive
Committee Minutes #6/13, held on August 9, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
RES.#A156/13 - SECTION IV- ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
THAT Section IV item EX9.1 - Canadian Tire Warehouse Distribution Centre, Town of
Caledon, Region of Peel, contained in Executive Committee Minutes#7/13, held on
September 13, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
RES.#A157/13 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Maria Augimeri
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06 items EX10.1 - EX10.119, contained in Executive
Committee Minutes #6/13, held on August 9, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
RES.#A158/13 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
Moved by: Glenn Mason
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06 items EX10.1 - EX10.116, contained in Executive
Committee Minutes #7/13, held on September 13, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
383
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:57 a.m., on Friday, September 27, 2013.
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/ks
384
Toronto and Region
Conservation
Authority
MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY#8/13
October 25, 2013
The Authority Meeting #8/13, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village,
on Friday, October 25, 2013. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order
at 9:34 a.m.
PRESENT
Paul Ainslie Member
Maria Augimeri Vice Chair
David Barrow Member
Ben Cachola Member
Bob Callahan Member
Raymond Cho Member
Ronald Chopowick Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Jack Heath Member
Colleen Jordan Member
Mujeeb Khan Member
Gloria Lindsay Luby Member
Mike Mattos Member
Peter Milczyn Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair
Linda Pabst Member
John Parker Member
Anthony Perruzza Member
Deb Schulte Member
John Sprovieri Member
Cynthia Thorburn Member
Jim Tovey Member
Richard Whitehead Member
ABSENT
Vincent Crisanti Member
Glenn De Baeremaeker Member
Chris Fonseca Member
Glenn Mason Member
Dave Ryan Member
385
RES.#A159/13 - MINUTES
Moved by: Cynthia Thorburn
Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #7/13, held on September 27, 2013, be approved.
CARRIED
PRESENTATIONS
(a) A presentation by Gerri Lynn O'Connor, Chair and Brian Denney, Chief Executive
Officer, TRCA to Margaret McCrae, President, Toronto Field Naturalists, in regard to
their 90th Anniversary and item AUTH7.1 -Toronto Field Naturalists.
(b) A presentation by Beth Williston, Senior Manager, Environmental Assessment Planning,
TRCA, in regard to item AUTH7.2 - Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Line 9B Reversal and Line
9B Capacity Expansion Project.
(c) A presentation by Rocco Sgambelluri, Chief Financial Officer, in regard to item BAAB7.1
- 2014 Preliminary Capital and Operating Estimates..
RES.#A160/13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan
THAT above-noted presentation (a) be received.
CARRIED
RES.#A161/13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick
THAT above-noted presentation (b) be received.
CARRIED
RES.#A162/13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: David Barrow
Seconded by: Deb Schulte
THAT above-noted presentation (c) be received.
CARRIED
386
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#A163/13 - TORONTO FIELD NATURALISTS
Recognition of the Toronto Field Naturalists 90th Anniversary and the
important contribution made by its members by encouraging public
interest and the protection of natural heritage.
Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) recognize and congratulate the
Toronto Field Naturalists on the occasion of their 90th Anniversary;
THAT TRCA thank the Toronto Field Naturalists for their support of TRCA youth
education programs providing $49,500 to offset transportation costs for students to
attend the Kortright Centre for Conservation over the past four years;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to continue to work with the Toronto Field
Naturalists and encourage their ongoing involvement in TRCA projects and programs to
promote youth and public engagement and education in nature based activities.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Toronto Field Naturalists is a volunteer based, charitable non-profit organization that has
been promoting Toronto's natural heritage since 1923. Members include ecological experts
who share their knowledge with others to encourage public interest in natural history and the
preservation of our natural heritage. The Toronto Field Naturalists (TFN) works with like-minded
groups and organizations to protect and enhance Toronto's ravines, parks and waterfront.
TFN produces a monthly newsletter for members, hosts monthly lectures on a wide range of
ecological topics, and holds regular nature themed walks throughout the TRCA jurisdiction,
often on TRCA properties, and they have provided valuable input to many TRCA projects over
the years. TFN also participates in TRCA events, including the Tommy Thompson Park Spring
Bird Festival and Butterfly Festival; takes part in special projects and committees such as the
East Don Trail Environmental Assessment and the Tommy Thompson Park User Group; and
sponsors TRCA programs such as transportation for priority schools to attend outdoor
education programs at the Kortright Centre for Conservation.
RATIONALE
Volunteer based organizations, especially those with a long history in the community, are
essential in fostering the public involvement, appreciation and understanding of our natural
heritage, including TRCA initiatives. The Toronto Field Naturalists are one of the oldest
nature-based charitable groups in Ontario and remain very active in the City of Toronto and the
wider GTA. TRCA's continued relationship with TFN is consistent with TRCA's Strategic Plan,
specifically priority strategy #5, foster sustainable citizenship and priority strategy #7 build
partnerships and new business models. By working collaboratively with TFN, TRCA will
continue to increase education and awareness that is fundamental to the development of The
Living City.
387
Report prepared by: Karen McDonald, extension 5248
Emails: kmcdonald @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Karen McDonald, extension 5248
Emails: kmcdonald @trca.on.ca
Date: October 4, 2013
RES.#A164/13 - ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC., LINE 9B REVERSAL AND LINE 9B
CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT
Update on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's written argument
submitted to the National Energy Board regarding the Enbridge Pipelines
Inc. Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick
THAT the written argument Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff
submitted to the National Energy Board (NEB) on October 3, 2013, regarding the Line 9B
Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to report back to the Authority regarding the
National Energy Board future decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the
project.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #2/13, held on March 22, 2013, amended Resolution #A27/13 was
approved as follows:
WHEREAS concerns of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) related to the
Enbridge Pipelines Incorporated(Enbridge) Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity
Expansion Project (Project)are focused on its role as watershed managers, landowners
and through its obligations under Ontario Regulation 166/06;
AND WHEREAS TRCA has submitted a letter to the National Energy Board (NEB)
commenting on the List of Issues that will be addressed by the board;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT staff continue to consult with affected
municipalities and agencies on common issues and concerns;
THAT staff initiate a dialogue with Enbridge to review issues of concern to TRCA and
determine if an agreement can be reached with Enbridge to address TRCA interests in
the Project;
THAT staff file an application to participate in the NEB Hearing on or before the April 11,
2013 deadline to participate as an Intervenor, thus ensuring that if an agreement with
Enbridge cannot be reached, TRCA can advance its interests through the NEB;
388
THAT TRCA staff be directed to concurrently negotiate with Enbridge and participate in
the NEB hearing;
THAT if TRCA's interests are addressed by written agreement with Enbridge, that TRCA
staff report back to the Authority;
THAT staff continue to work with Enbridge in the implementation of its Integrity Dig
Program to ensure TRCA regulatory requirements are met;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA request that Enbridge release publicly the most up-to-date
data on the integrity of Line 9 Pipeline prior to June 1, 2013.
Intervenor Status
TRCA was granted intervenor status in the NEB process. This status allowed TRCA to ask
Enbridge for information related to its expressed concerns, and for Enbridge to respond.
Through this process, TRCA could have submitted written evidence, or appeared at a hearing
with an oral presentation. TRCA worked within the process set forth by the NEB, and chose to
prepare a written argument. Throughout the process, TRCA continued to work with
municipalities, other conservation authorities and Enbridge itself, to discuss concerns and
solutions.
TRCA Information Requests to Enbridge
Part of the NEB hearing process allows for the intervenors to request information of Enbridge,
for Enbridge to respond, and then for the intervenors to ask for additional information based on
the response to both themselves, and the response to others. TRCA information requests
related to Enbridge's reactive response to spills or leaks, pipeline integrity, in stream and valley
monitoring, emergency shut off valves, travel time modelling and an ecosystem based
compensation protocol in the event of a spill.
RATIONALE
As per Authority direction of March 22, 2013, staff initiated a dialogue with Enbridge regarding
the review of TRCA issues and concerns. Based on the legal advice from both TRCA and
Enbridge representatives, it was agreed that TRCA and Enbridge should manage their
discussions within the framework of the NEB process, and not seek an agreement that would
be outside of the process. TRCA staff prepared written evidence, met with Enbridge, and
prepared its written argument as per the NEB process. Throughout this process, the open
dialogue with Enbridge was maintained. Staff has also maintained an open dialogue with other
conservation authorities and municipalities regarding issues of common concern, primarily
including spills response and management, and pipeline integrity. Enbridge has advised that
for security reasons, it does not publicize the precise location of the integrity digs, however this
information is communicated to the affected landowners and municipalities when the digs are
initiated. Permits are required from TRCA if the digs are located within regulated areas. To date,
four permits have been issued by TRCA, three applications are currently under review, and
three applications have been screened with confirmation that they are outside TRCA's regulated
area. All permits issued to date have been by staff through the routine infrastructure permitting
process, and then brought to the Executive Committee for their information. Additionally, TRCA
has issued a permission to enter into the Greenwood Conservation Area to undertake an
integrity dig. This area was screened by planning staff who determined no permit was required.
389
TRCA Written Evidence to the NEB
On August 2, 2013, TRCA filed written evidence with the NEB. The TRCA's evidence focused
on:
1. Reducing the environmental impact of malfunctions or accidents.
2. Pipeline monitoring strategies and spills prevention.
3. Spill response and emergency planning, including timelines for response.
4. Maintaining ecosystem integrity.
TRCA based its concerns on its roles as a watershed manager, landowner and regulator.
Specific reference was made to TRCA's authority and responsibilities under the Conservation
Authorities Act, Ontario Regulation 166/06, the Clean Water Act, and in terms of its level 3
agreement with Fisheries and Ocean Canada for review under the Fisheries Act.
Specifically, TRCA's concerns relate to:
1. The risk of a spill as related to exposure or failure in valleys, streams or wetlands, and how
the risk of a spill will be mitigated, or in the worst case, how the terrestrial, aquatic and open
space systems will be protected, rehabilitated and/or restored.
2. Spills prevention.
3. Collection and analysis of baseline information in advance of any spill that is related to
proactive pipeline exposure and failure risk assessment, spills response planning, and
rehabilitation and restoration planning.
Staff recommended that Enbridge consider its Interim Technical Guidelines for the
Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure (Revised July
2013) available on the TRCA website http://trca.on.ca/dotAsset/167180.pdf. The guidelines
were developed by staff over a number of years through working with proponents of sewer, gas
and oil pipeline infrastructure under emergency situations. Enbridge can use these guidelines
to develop a proactive approach to managing potential failures or fractures of pipelines in valley
and stream corridors and wetland areas, and as a means of ensuring the protection, mitigation
and restoration of TRCA's terrestrial, aquatic and open space systems.
TRCA's evidence included information on the nine major watersheds within TRCA's jurisdiction.
This evidence comprised general environmental information; potential impacts of a crude oil
release on the terrestrial and aquatic environments; TRCA's existing monitoring infrastructure;
requirement for a proactive approach to pipeline failure; and a case study of the Rouge River
watershed. A copy of the full report can be found on the NEB's website at:
httr)://www.neb-one.ac.catietch.asOlanauaae=E&ID=A53263.
Case Study- Morningside Creek, Rouge River Watershed
The Rouge River watershed south of Line 9B, with its numerous environmentally significant
areas and wetlands, is a significant component of TRCA's Natural Heritage System. South of
the Line 9B pipeline, most of the Rouge River watershed is protected through its ownership by
TRCA and its designation as Rouge Park. Like all watersheds in TRCAs jurisdiction, Ontario
Regulation 166/06 permits are required for proponent's works in a regulated area.
390
Throughout information provided by Enbridge to TRCA and others, it has been consistently
stated that Enbridge will have sufficient time and means to mitigate a spill from the Line 9B
pipeline, there will be little impact downstream, and that the spill will not reach Lake Ontario.
TRCA has expressed concern with these assumptions for a number of reasons:
a) Mitigation provided by Enbridge appears to be under base flows conditions; there is no
modelling under storm conditions (high flow conditions).
b) Mitigation assumes responders will know where and how to access the downstream
spill location; modelling has not been completed and access points have not been
mapped.
c) Mitigation assumes that all spill impacts can be restored or rehabilitated; baseline
information as to existing conditions is not known.
d) Mitigation assumes that all impacts will be riverine based, not lake based. As such a
spills action plan is not provided for lake-based cleanup.
In the Rouge watershed, TRCA has completed modelling for Morningside Creek, a tributary of
the Rouge River. Through this modelling, TRCA illustrated why it is imperative that Enbridge
complete a detailed modelling program for all crossings of TRCA watersheds in order to
determine potential spill impacts, and to inform riverine and lake-based mitigation planning,
including access. It should be noted that through the Drinking Water Source Protection
Program, modelling for large releases of contaminants was completed from the river mouths to
the drinking water intakes. The modelling considered travel through the lake and was based on
actual weather events. Riverine and lake-based modelling should be used together by
Enbridge to inform their spills response planning initiatives.
Enbridge has stated that its spill response time can vary between 1.5 to 4 hours depending on
factors such as weather and traffic conditions, time of day, day of the week and location of the
release site, and the time to detect a spill can take up to two hours. The time to respond to a
spill in TRCA's watersheds could be upwards of 6 hours in a worst case situation. The plume
travel time is critical for Enbridge to determine the approximate downstream area of spill and to
determine whether the spill would reach Lake Ontario by the time responders arrive at the spill
site. The distance the spill will travel will vary depending on the velocity in the rivers during base
flow and high flow conditions.
Staff completed a modeling analysis for both the Morningside Tributary and a portion of the
Lower Main Rouge, downstream of its confluence with Morningside Tributary during both
baseflow and storm flow conditions. The results showed the time of travel for a spill in the
Morningside Tributary to reach Lake Ontario as follows:
a) baseflow conditions: 27.4 hours;
b) 2-year storm event: 14 hours;
c) 100-year storm event: 6.1 hours.
391
While a spill in Morningside Creek under baseflow conditions may be managed near its source,
under storm flow conditions it is apparent that the time of travel from the pipeline to Lake
Ontario increases significantly depending on the storm event. Due to factors including climate
change, in TRCAs jurisdiction we are seeing more occurrences of high intensity storm events,
such as the August 2005 and July 2013 storms both of which exceeded the 100 year storm
event. With increased flow, the rates of in-stream and valley erosion also increase. As a result,
in the opinion of TRCA, storm events also pose increased risk of pipeline fracture, for if the
pipeline becomes exposed, there is risk that debris may fracture the exposed pipeline. As such,
TRCA submitted to the NEB that based on the evidence and TRCA's vast experience in dealing
with underground utility structures, for each of TRCA's nine watersheds Enbridge must take a
proactive approach to address pipeline exposure and failure through geohazard risk
assessments; spills response planning through modelling scenarios that include dry and wet
weather conditions; and the collection of baseline information to inform any future rehabilitation
or restoration planning.
Discussions between TRCA and Enbridge Pipelines Inc.
As directed by the Authority, on August 22, 2013 TRCA staff met with Enbridge representatives
to review the Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project in relation to TRCA's
interests and concerns that were documented in the written evidence submitted to the NEB on
August 2, 2013. Enbridge staff present at the meeting included the Director, Eastern Region
Operations, Senior Manager, Environment (Projects) Canada, Senior Manager, Environment
(Operations) Canada, Senior Manager, Pipeline Asset Integrity, Manager, Risk Management
Modelling, and Supervisor, Area Operations. Discussion items included:
1. An overview of TRCA concerns as outlined in its written evidence, including proactive
pipeline exposure and failure risk assessment, spills response planning, and rehabilitation
and restoration planning. Discussions also included an overview of the TRCA Regional
Watersheds Monitoring Program and the TRCA Erosion Control Monitoring Program.
2. Discussions included TRCA's information request, including detailed presentations by
Enbridge regarding responses to leaks or spills, pipeline integrity, in stream and valley land
monitoring programs, pipeline shut-off valves, travel time modelling, environmental
monitoring and an ecosystem compensation protocol.
3. A detailed review and discussion of TRCA's Interim Technical Guidelines for the
Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure.
4. A detailed discussion of geohazard risk assessments; spills response planning and
modelling; and rehabilitation and restoration planning that was based on the Case Study
example of Morningside Creek in the Rouge River watershed
At that meeting Enbridge confirmed that it has completed tactical response plans for the Don
River watershed, and would be completing plans for the Humber watershed in the near future.
Since that time, TRCA and Enbridge have continued to liaise through email and phone
conversations.
CONCLUSION
As an intervenor, TRCA was afforded the opportunity to provide a final argument to the NEB
based on its original application, as well as its written evidence and responses from Enbridge.
TRCA chose to prepare a written argument. The TRCA written argument was referenced and
supported in the oral argument of the City of Toronto.
392
TRCA Written Argument to the NEB
On October 3, 2013, TRCA filed its final written argument with the NEB. In its argument, TRCA
advised that TRCA does not oppose Enbridge's application provided its concerns through
conditions of approval to be instituted by the NEB. TRCA conditions include addressing
pipeline integrity, understanding environmental conditions of potentially affected landscapes in
case of a spill, and establishing detailed spill response plans. TRCA understands it will play a
supporting role in any spills action plan as an environmental agency and as a landowner, but
that the lead response agencies will be Enbridge, the adjacent pipeline operators of
Trans-Northern and Sun Canadian, Ministry of the Environment and municipal emergency
services.
A synopsis of the TRCA proposed conditions to the NEB is provided below:
TRCA PROPOSED CONDITION NO. 1
1. Enbridge shall work with TRCA to develop and undertake a comprehensive geohazard
risk assessment and monitoring program that includes:
a. Survey and analysis of geomorphic conditions (including the horizontal distance
of the pipe from the edge of the watercourse to the side of the pipe)
b. Survey and analysis of valley erosion (including the horizontal distance of the
pipe from the edge of the valley wall to the side of the pipe)
c. Review and analysis of hydraulic data and changes to the hydraulic regime
through updates to hydraulic modelling (available from TRCA)
d. Incorporate the potential impacts of climate change as related to precipitation
distribution and volume, as it is recognized that such changes could alter the
hydrologic conditions and the hydraulic regime in TRCA's watersheds
e. Meet with TRCA to discuss development of a monitoring program that is
consistent with TRCA's Erosion Control Monitoring Program
f. Update its in-stream and valleyland monitoring procedures and protocols to a
level consistent with conservation authority standard
2. Enbridge shall provide TRCA with regular updates on results of comprehensive
geohazard risk assessment and monitoring program, updates to the Pipeline Integrity
Dig Program, and confirmation of any short-term, long term or emergency permitting
requirements in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06, together with approvals
under the Fisheries Act.
TRCA PROPOSED CONDITION NO. 2
1. Enbridge shall work with TRCA to develop a baseline conditions report that will include
an evaluation of:
a. Geomorphic conditions, including depth of cover survey at all crossings and
stream geomorphic conditions
b. Valley slope conditions
c. Lake Ontario shoreline conditions
d. Areas of natural significance
e. Terrestrial and aquatic habitat and species
f. Hydraulic or hydrologic conditions
393
g. Precipitation data
h. Sources of drinking water
i. Public open spaces, including TRCA lands
j. Storm sewer catch basin and outfall location evaluations
TRCA PROPOSED CONDITION NO. 3
1. Enbridge shall undertake spill response modelling scenarios that include:
a. Dry and wet weather conditions
b. Detailed watershed response plans
c. Access for containment and cleanup in valley and stream corridors, wetlands
and Lake Ontario
d. A rehabilitation and restoration strategy
e. A compensation strategy
2. Enbridge shall establish a Greater Toronto Area based spill response team as an immediate
requirement.
3. Enbridge shall undertake emergency response exercises detailed in NEB Condition 23, and
to include lake-based, dry weather and wet weather scenarios for each of TRCA's
watersheds and Lake Ontario.
TRCA's written evidence, including the detailed conditions, is attached as Attachment 1 to this
report.
NEXT STEPS
1. In the past, the NEB had indicated they expected to have a decision in January 2014. The
most recent timetable however indicates the date for the decision is "to be determined".
2. The NEB has significant amounts of information to review and synthesize, including:
a. Enbridge Application materials, Information Requests from NEB and Intervenors and
Responses, Additional Evidence and Reply Evidence.
b. Intervenors submissions-there are 60 Intervenors. Not all have submitted written
evidence and/or final written arguments however, 10 Intervenors submitted Written
Final Arguments and 39 Intervenors are presenting Oral Final Arguments either in
Montreal or Toronto.
c. Letters of Comment -there 111 letters of comment, 43 from
municipalities/organizations and 68 from individuals.
4. As advised by TRCA lawyers, it is expected that the NEB will approve Enbridge's
application with conditions and timing requirements. Pursuant to the NEB Act, the NEB
may impose conditions and timing on those conditions.
5. Any of the NEB's orders may be enforced like an order of the Federal or Superior Court
pursuant to section 17 of the Act, and the NEB is able to create offenses, and specifically
offenses for failing to comply with an order or a decision, pursuant to the Act.
6. Enbridge will have to report to the NEB on any of the conditions that may be imposed as we
saw in the potential draft conditions that the NEB produced last week for review and
comment.
7. TRCA staff will report back to the Authority upon the completion of the NEB hearing, to
advise of the Board's resolution.
394
8. If the NEB approves the project with conditions, staff shall compare the requirements of the
Board to TRCA's proposed conditions as submitted in its written evidence.
Report prepared by: Beth Williston, extension 5217 and Don Ford, extension 5369.
Emails: bwilliston @trca.on.ca and dford @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5217 and Don Ford, extension 5369.
Emails: bwilliston @trca.on.ca and dford @trca.on.ca
Date: October 17, 2013
Attachments: 1
395
Attachment 1
Enbridge Pipelines Inc.
Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project
Application under section 58 and Part IV ("Application")
of the National Energy Board Act OH-002-2013
File: OF-Fac-Oil-E101-2012-10 02
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Written Final Argument
L OVERVIEW
1. Enbridge Pipelines Inc. ("Enbridge") has applied to the National Energy Board ("NEB") for
approval to reverse the flow of Line 9B between North Westover and Montreal, to expand
the capacity of Line 9 between Sarnia and Montreal and a revision to the Line 9 Rules and
Regulations Tariff to allow the transport of heavy crude. Line 9B is an existing pipeline.
2. Approximately 65 kilometres of the pipeline is within Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority ("TRCA") jurisdiction. TRCA's jurisdiction includes nine watersheds, the shoreline
of Lake Ontario and five drinking water inlets. The pipeline crosses all nine watersheds and
in the event of a spill, has the potential to impact naturally sensitive areas, endangered
species and drinking water quality. Four of these watersheds are of national or provincial
significance. Details on each of these watersheds are set out in TRCA's Written Evidence.
3. TRCA objectives are to ensure that:
a. any malfunctions, accidents and spills are minimized, and
b. in the event of a malfunction, accident or spill, damage to the environment (including
terrestrial and aquatic habitat and species, valley and stream corridors, the Lake
Ontario shoreline, public open spaces, including TRCA lands, and drinking water
sources) is minimized.
4. TRCA's submissions focus on NEB Issues 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9.
5. TRCA submits that TRCA's objectives can be accomplished if Enbridge takes a proactive
approach, outlined in detail in Section III and IV below and described in TRCA's Written
Evidence.
6. In summary, Enbridge must take a proactive approach to
a. monitor pipeline integrity
b. understand environmental concerns (including geomorphic conditions, valley slope
conditions, areas of natural significance, terrestrial and aquatic species and habitats,
sources of drinking water and hydrology), and
c. establish detailed spills response plans that include hydraulic conditions during
base and high flow, (flow rates, velocities, and flood plain extent), environmental
concerns, baseline conditions and timely access to spill location and staging
locations (including a Toronto based spills response team), and mitigation.
7. TRCA comments on NEB's Draft Potential Conditions ("NEB Potential Conditions") and
provides additional conditions that address TRCA's concerns in Section IV below. TRCA
submits these conditions should be included in any approval issued by the NEB prior to
approving Enbridge's application.
396
8. Provided that TRCA's concerns and conditions regarding the proactive mitigation of
potential adverse effects to the environment are satisfied as detailed in Sections III and IV,
TRCA does not oppose Enbridge's application.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
9. The NEB, in Hearing Order OH-002-2013 issued February 19, 2013, defined the scope of
Enbridge's application as the reversal of the Line 9B pipeline from North Westover to
Montreal, the expansion of the capacity of Line 9 between Sarnia and Montreal and a
revision to the Line 9 Rules and Regulations Tariff to allow the transport of heavy crude.
10. The Project is limited to the existing pipeline. TRCA understands that no new pipelines will
be constructed.
III. PROACTIVE APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS AND
MITIGATING POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS
11. On August 27, 2013, Enbridge met with TRCA staff to discuss mitigation strategies for
pipeline integrity, emergency response strategies, improvements to emergency
preparedness, incident command structure and on-going dialogue between TRCA and
Enbridge.
12. TRCA believes the meeting with Enbridge is a positive first step towards a proactive
approach and demonstrates Enbridge's acceptance of the need to understand the
environmental and hydraulic conditions and incorporate these conditions into proactive
pipeline integrity monitoring and emergency response plans.
A. Monitorina Pipeline Intearitv
13. Enbridge must monitor pipeline exposures and long term in-stream and valley erosion.
Mitigation and monitoring prior to pipeline exposure, or in the worst case of a breach, is
imperative to ensure pipeline issues are corrected before there is a failure or leak.
14. TRCA's concerns with pipeline infrastructure on or near valley lands, streams and wetlands
include:
a. the in-stream depth of cover over the pipeline
i. when downcutting of the watercourse occurs, there must be sufficient
overburden cover to ensure the integrity of the pipeline is protected during high
flow conditions
ii. the watersheds in TRCA's jurisdiction are largely urban systems, where
downcutting is at a higher rate than in rural scenarios due to increased rates of
flow, and where discharges are frequent, flashy and of a significant velocity.
Changes to the hydraulic regime must be accounted for on an ongoing basis
through updates to hydraulic modeling, including valley erosion and geomorphic
survey and analysis, and precipitation and hydraulic data analysis, and
397
iii. the impacts of climate change could affect precipitation distribution and volume
that could alter the hydrologic conditions and the hydraulic regime in TRCA's
watersheds. The frequency of modeling, survey and analysis may need to be
adjusted to account for hydrologic and hydraulic regime changes.
b. the horizontal distance of the pipe from the edge of the watercourse to the side of
the pipe. When streambank erosion occurs, there must be sufficient riparian cover
to ensure the integrity of the pipeline is protected
c. the horizontal distance of the pipe from the edge of the valley wall to the side of the
pipe. When valley wall erosion occurs, there must be sufficient cover to ensure the
integrity of the pipe is protected
d. during the meeting between TRCA and Enbridge, it was noted that, if unmitigated,
an oil leak from a pipeline break on the tableland may travel overland, pass through
the street level catch basin, through the storm sewer system and then discharge
directly to the river or wetland. All potential storm sewers that have direct
connections to wetlands, rivers or valleylands must be assessed, and included in the
detailed response plans.
15. TRCA notes from the review of information submitted by Enbridge that there have been
limited or no surveys or evaluations of the following:
a. depth of cover survey at all crossings
b. stream geomorphic conditions
c. valley slope conditions
d. areas of natural significance
e. terrestrial and aquatic habitat and species
f. hydraulic or hydrologic conditions
g. sources of drinking water
h. public open spaces, including TRCA lands
i. storm sewer catch basin and outfall location evaluations, and
j. procedure for pipeline repair or securement. Note: Under Ontario Regulation 166/06
regular or emergency works permits may be required, together with approvals under
the Fisheries Act.
16. A proactive and scientific approach to understanding the depth of cover, both in stream and
on the valley slopes is fundamental in assessing, evaluating and preventing issues related
to exposure. As part of specific project agreements or on a priority basis, TRCA
implements TRCA's Erosion Control Monitoring Program, to monitor erosion and
instability-prone areas, evaluate results and implement stabilization works on a priority
basis.
17. TRCA has developed standardized protocols and procedures to identify, assess, track and
prioritize erosion hazards using a relational web-based database that allow sites to be
added and modified in real-time as new hazards are identified and priorities re-evaluated.
These monitoring sites include erosion hazards on private property, existing public erosion
control structures, and select municipal infrastructure (sanitary sewer crossings, retaining
walls, park trails, etc.). At TRCA's meeting with Enbridge on August 27, 2013, Enbridge
expressed interest in reviewing TRCA's Erosion Control Monitoring Program and the
associated monitoring parameters. TRCA and Enbridge will continue to engage in
discussions in this regard.
398
18. Over the past three years, TRCA has responded to three emergency situations related to
the Enbridge Line 9B pipeline. The pipeline was not broken or breached in any of these
circumstances. However, if proper study had been undertaken by Enbridge, it is TRCA's
opinion that the depth of cover, or lack thereof, could have been determined in advance of
the visual inspection that discovered the exposure, and the declaration by Enbridge of an
emergency situation related to the pipeline.
19. To reduce or eliminate these emergency situations, TRCA submits that Enbridge should be
required to carry out monitoring consistent with TRCA's Erosion Control Monitoring Program
and update in-stream and valleyland monitoring procedures.
20. The number and placement of automated shut off valves is a concern for TRCA given the
significance of the watersheds, urban populations and infrastructure, including drinking
water intakes under TRCA's jurisdiction. At the August 27, 2013 meeting between Enbridge
and TRCA, Enbridge confirmed that Enbridge is investigating the number and placement of
automated shut off valves.
21. Enbridge's updated response to NEB Information Request 4.7 outlines the addition of two
shut off valves along the pipeline within TRCA's jurisdiction at KP 3080.61 (MP 1914.2) and
KP 3083.50 (MP 1916). Enbridge must continue to assess shut off valve locations as
Enbridge obtains additional information about TRCA's watersheds.
B. Understanding Environmental Conditions
22. Environmental information that will be useful to Enbridge in the development of a proactive
spills response plan for Line 9B are available from TRCA for TRCA's nine watersheds. At the
meeting between TRCA and Enbridge on August 27, 2013, Enbridge expressed interest in
working with TRCA to obtain relevant environmental information.
23. Spill response, clean-up, restoration and compensation are not possible without first
establishing and understanding baseline information about the watersheds in advance of
any spill.
24. TRCA has environmental information including:
a. regional Watershed Monitoring Program
b. flood plain mapping and flood modeling
c. stream flow and precipitation data
d. terrestrial Natural Heritage Management Program
e. erosion Management Program
f. watershed-based Habitat Restoration Program
25. TRCA submits that this information is crucial to Enbridge understanding the environmental
conditions of each watershed, planning a detailed spills response plan and providing
ecosystem compensation and restoration following a spill. Enbridge should be required to
obtain this information and incorporate it into watershed specific spill response plans.
399
C. Establishina Detailed Spills Response Plans
26. TRCA's experience shows that preparation of an Environmental Management Plan ("EMP")
using the TRCA Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management
Plans for Underground Infrastructure, Revised July 2013, would result in a proactive
approach to managing potential failures or fractures of the Line 9B pipeline in valley and
stream corridors and wetland areas, and provide a means of ensuring the protection,
mitigation and restoration including terrestrial and aquatic habitat and species, valley and
stream corridors, the Lake Ontario shoreline, and public open spaces, including TRCA
lands. TRCA has expertise and data available to Enbridge and should be consulted prior to
Enbridge initiating work on an EMP.
27. The conservation, restoration, development and management of natural resources in each
of TRCA's nine watersheds as well as the nearshore of Lake Ontario, may be impacted by
malfunctions or accidents on Line 9B. Depending upon stream flow conditions, homes and
businesses in flood plain areas, the source water protection areas and the Lake Ontario
drinking water intakes in the City of Ajax, the City of Toronto and the City of Mississauga
may also be impacted.
28. When Enbridge discovers a spill, Enbridge must have already established a detailed
mitigation plan for each of the TRCA watersheds to reduce response times, eliminate
unnecessary delays caused by establishing response and mitigation plans at the time of the
spill and ensure that impacts are minimized.
29. Enbridge's materials advise that once a spill is detected, it could take an additional 1.5 to 4
hours to respond once a spill has been detected. The time for Enbridge to respond to a
spill could be upwards of six hours.
30. TRCA's modelling for a spill at the Morningside Creek, a tributary of the Rouge River,
revealed that in low flow conditions, a spill from Line 9B could spread to Lake Ontario in 14
hours. Under high flow conditions, this travel time may be dramatically reduced to as little
as six hours or less. It is expected that for each crossing location, the times of travel to Lake
Ontario could vary significantly based on the river or creek's specific hydraulic and flow
conditions. The most critical time for spills management is during high flow events.
31. The EMP must include:
a. scenario modelling under a variety of hydraulic conditions, including dry weather
and a variety of storm frequencies and seasonal changes, the extent of the flood
plain, velocity of storm flows to determine spill containment methods, available
access areas, and travel times
b. ocation of storage and staging areas
c. timely notification of regulating agencies
d. timely containment of the spill including:
i. control plan for a breach in the pipe, and
ii. control plan for the oil flow, including access to containment areas
e. disaster scenario training during base and high flow, and seasonal (summer/winter)
conditions
400
f. methods for identifying aquatic and terrestrial species and habitats impacted by the
spill, and
g. methods for establishing a rehabilitation and restoration strategy in the event of a
spill, including baseline conditions and a method for determining if there is adequate
restoration and compensation.
32. In the meeting between TRCA and Enbridge on August 27, 2013, Enbridge recognized that
watershed based EMPs should be completed on a priority basis.
33. TRCA's top priority watersheds for emergence response and mitigation planning are the
Don River, Humber River, Rouge River and Duffins Creek watersheds.
34. The remaining TRCA watersheds of the Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek, Petticoat Creek,
Carruthers Creek and Highland Creek should also be assessed and prioritized against all
watersheds along the pipeline as time and funding permit.
35. A Spills Response Team located in the Greater Toronto Area would reduce the travel time
required for a response team to reach a spill in TRCA's jurisdiction and initiate emergency
response protocols and mitigation. This could result in fewer impacts to the environment
and drinking water. The spills response team must be equipped to deal with oil in Lake
Ontario.
IV. COMMENTS ON NEB'S DRAFT POTENTIAL CONDITIONS
36. TRCA has reviewed the NEB Potential Conditions. Below are TRCA's comments on the
NEB Potential Conditions and proposed language for additional conditions.
A. Conditions to Monitor Pipeline Intearitv
37. TRCA recognizes that NEB Condition 15 addresses the number and placement of
automatic shut off valves. However, TRCA considers the review and implementation of the
automatic shutoff valves as an immediate and ongoing requirement as Enbridge undertakes
the Watercourse Crossing Management Plan in Condition 22, the EMP and the baseline
environmental condition report.
38. TRCA appreciates that the NEB recognizes in NEB Condition 16 that a comprehensive
geohazard risk assessment and monitoring program is required and sets some details in
NEB Conditions 17 and 22. However, TRCA is concerned that the geohazard risk
assessment and monitoring program is not sufficiently robust to address TRCA's concerns.
39. TRCA proposes the following language to address the additional information required for
the geohazard risk assessment:
TRCA PROPOSED CONDITION NO. 1
Enbridge shall
a. Work with TRCA to develop and undertake a comprehensive geohazard risk
assessment and monitoring program that includes:
401
i. survey and analysis of geomorphic conditions-the horizontal distance of the
pipe from the edge of the watercourse to the side of the pipe
ii. survey and analysis of valley erosion -the horizontal distance of the pipe from
the edge of the valley wall to the side of the pipe
iii. review and analysis of hydraulic data and changes to the hydraulic regime
through updates to hydraulic modeling (available from TRCA)
iv. incorporate the potential impacts of climate change in terms of precipitation
distribution and volume, recognizing that such changes could alter the
hydrologic conditions and the hydraulic regime in TRCA's watersheds; adjust the
frequency of modeling, survey and analysis of the above factors
v. meet with TRCA to discuss development of a monitoring program that is
consistent with TRCA's Erosion Control Monitoring Program
vi. update its in-stream and valleyland monitoring procedures and protocols to a
level consistent with conservation authority standard
b. provide TRCA with regular updates on results of comprehensive geohazard risk
assessment and monitoring program, updates to the Pipeline Integrity Dig Program,
and confirmation of any short-term, long term or emergency permitting requirements
in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06, together with approvals under the
Fisheries Act.
B. Conditions to Understand Environmental Conditions
40. The NEB Potential Conditions do not require Enbridge to understand and plan for existing
environmental conditions.
41. TRCA proposes the following conditions to develop a baseline environmental condition
report:
TRCA PROPOSED CONDITION NO. 2
Enbridge shall
a. Work with TRCA to develop a baseline conditions report that will include an
evaluation of:
i. Geomorphic conditions, including depth of cover survey at all crossings and
stream geomorphic conditions
ii. Valley slope conditions
iii. Lake Ontario shoreline conditions
iv. Areas of natural significance
v. Terrestrial and aquatic habitat and species
vi Hydraulic or hydrologic conditions
vii. Precipitation data
viii. Sources of drinking water
ix. Public open spaces, including TRCA lands
x. Storm sewer catch basin and outfall location evaluations
C. Conditions to Establish Detailed Spills Response Plans
42. TRCA respectfully submits that the NEB Conditions do not adequately address proactive
spill response planning.
402
43. Spill response modelling scenarios must include:
a. dry and wet weather conditions
b. detailed watershed response plans
c. access for containment and cleanup in valley and stream corridors, wetlands and
Lake Ontario
d. a rehabilitation and restoration strategy, and
e. a compensation strategy.
44. TRCA considers establishment of a Great Toronto Area based spills response team as an
immediate requirement.
45. Emergency response exercises detailed in NEB Condition 23 need to include lake based,
dry weather and wet weather scenarios for each of TRCA's watersheds and Lake Ontario.
46. To address TRCA's concerns about the need for detailed spill response plans, TRCA
proposes the following conditions:
TRCA PROPOSED CONDITION NO. 3
Enbridge shall:
a. use the TRCA Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental
Management Plans(EMP) for Underground Infrastructure, Revised July 2013, to
inform the development of watershed based spills response plans
b. the EMP must include:
i. scenario modelling under a variety of hydraulic conditions, including dry weather
and a variety of storm frequencies and seasonal changes, the extent of the flood
plain, velocity of storm flows to determine spill containment methods, available
access areas, and travel times
ii. location of storage and staging areas
iii. timely notification of responding and regulating agencies
iv. timely containment of the spill including control plan for a breach in the pipe and
control plan for the oil flow, including access to containment areas
v. disaster scenario training during base and high flow, and seasonal
(summer/winter) conditions, as well as in Lake Ontario
vi. methods for identifying aquatic and terrestrial species and habitats impacted by
the spill, and
vii. methods for establishing a rehabilitation and restoration strategy in the event of a
spill, including baseline conditions and a method for determining if there is
adequate restoration and compensation.
c. prioritize the development of watershed-based EMPs in TRCA's jurisdiction for the
Don River, Humber River, Rouge River and Duffins Creek Watersheds
d. prioritize the remaining TRCA watersheds: Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek, Petticoat
Creek, Highland Creek and Carruthers Creek.
e. ensure the EMP includes a review and assessment of all storm sewers that have
direct connections to wetlands, rivers or valley lands, and
f. provide a Spills Response Team based in the Greater Toronto Area that is equipped
to deal with an oil spill in Lake Ontario. Ensure there are clear roles for responders
and a coordinated response for notification of all agencies.
403
V. CONCLUSION
47. Provided that TRCA's concerns are satisfied, including revisions to the NEB Conditions to
address pipeline integrity, understanding environmental conditions and establishing
detailed spills repose plans, TRCA does not oppose Enbridge's application.
48. TRCA looks forward to ongoing cooperation between Enbridge and TRCA to create EMPs
that will respond to and manage potential failures or fractures along the pipeline and ensure
protection, mitigation and restoration of t terrestrial and aquatic habitat and species, valley
and stream corridors, the Lake Ontario shoreline, public open spaces, including TRCA
lands under TRCA's jurisdiction, in the event of a malfunction, accident or spill.
ALL OF WHICH IS RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED THIS 3 rd day of October, 2013
Jacquelyn Stevens/Joanna Vince
Willms &Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP
Counsel to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
** References cited in original Written Final Argument
404
RES.#A165/13 - EXCHANGE OF LANDS
Fire/EMS station,
Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel , CFN 47043.
Receipt of request from the Town of Caledon to exchange lands
to facilitate the construction of a Fire/EMS station located in the
Bolton area of the Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of
Peel.
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: David Barrow
WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a
request from the Town of Caledon (Caledon) to enter into an exchange of land;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to
proceed with an exchange of land in this instance;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA enter into an exchange of lands on the
following basis:
a) TRCA will convey to Caledon a parcel of land containing 1.2 hectares (3 acres), more
or less, being Part of Lot 11, Concession 16, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality
of Peel, located north of Cross Country Boulevard, west of Regional Road 50,
(Attachment 1);
b) Caledon will convey to TRCA various parcels of land containing a total of 14 hectares
(35 acres), more or less, being Part of Road Allowance between Concessions 5 and 6,
Part of Road Allowance between Concessions 7 and 8, Part of Road Allowance
between Lots 10 and 11, Part of Glassco Road, Part of Lot 22, Concessions 5 and 6,
Part of Lot 12, Concession 5 and Part of Lot 7, Concession 9; Town of Caledon,
Regional Municipality of Peel, (Attachment 2);
c) Caledon will pave of a portion of the internal road system in the Albion Hills
Conservation Area;
d) Caledon will construct a parking lot for the Albion Hills Community Farm for 20 cars
adjacent to the proposed Fire/EMS station;
e) That any remaining difference between the higher market value of the TRCA lands and
the value of the items outlined above be contributed by TRCA to the development of
community space at the Caledon Equestrian Park;
THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being
carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the sole expense of Caledon;
A permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06 be obtained prior to commencement of
construction if required;
405
THAT the conveyance of land be subject to a landscaping plan, subject to the approval of
TRCA staff;
THAT the sale be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act C.27 as amended;
That the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land
transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT appropriate TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A248/12 at Authority Meeting #10/12, held on January 4, 2013, agreed to allow
Caledon to include TRCA properties located north of King Street West, east of Duffy's Lane and
north of Cross Country Boulevard, west of Regional Road 50, in a feasibility study for a new
Fire/EMS station within the community of Bolton. The results of this study determined that the
TRCA property located north of Cross Country Boulevard, west of Regional Road 50 was the
preferred site for the Fire/EMS station.
Caledon has requested that TRCA convey this parcel of land to Caledon for construction of the
Fire/EMS station. In exchange for this parcel of land Caledon is proposing to convey to TRCA
various parcels of land including a number of road allowances in the Bolton area and adjacent
to Albion Hill Conservation Area and a parcel adjacent to the Bolton channel. Since the market
value of the TRCA parcel is significantly higher than the Caledon lands, Caledon has also
agreed to pave a portion of the internal road system in Albion Hills Conservation Area, and
construct a 20 car parking lot adjacent to the proposed Fire/EMS station for the Albion Hills
Community Farm. Caledon has requested that any remaining difference between the market
value of the TRCA parcel and the above-noted items be contributed by TRCA to the
construction of a community facility at the Caledon Equestrian Park.
RATIONALE
The construction of the Fire/EMS station on TRCA land at Cross Country Boulevard, west of
Regional Road 50 will allow Caledon to eliminate the existing fire hall operation presently
situated within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River.
The acquisition of the various parcels of land from Caledon will consolidate TRCA holdings in
the Bolton and Albion Hills areas.
There is funding in the 2013 budget to undertake improvements to the road base from the pool
parking lot to Albion Hills Community Farm. Currently there is no funding available to
undertake any paving. Caledon has agreed to pave this section, as well as the sections of road
leading to the Albion Hills Field Centre and the road leading to the pool parking lot.
406
The proposed Fire/EMS station will be located on a portion of the lands presently leased to the
Albion Hills Community Farm at this location. The farm has requested the construction of a 20
space parking lot for community farming operations that was previously proposed at this
location in exchange for the loss of this area from their lease.
The contribution of the difference in market value from this transaction along with additional
funding from Caledon will allow for construction of additional building area at the Caledon
Equestrian Park which will be available for community use and office space to be leased to
equine related organizations. TRCA will share in revenues generated from these facilities.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
Based on TRCA's preliminary review of the environmental criteria for lands that are eligible to
receive a property tax exemption under the provincial Conservation Land Tax Incentive
Program, it would appear that all the subject property would be eligible for exemption for the
2014 taxation year. The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact
TRCA's maintenance costs at this location, as TRCA owns and maintains lands adjacent to
each parcel being conveyed.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Caledon and TRCA will be responsible for their own legal and environmental audit fees and the
survey costs will be split 50/50. TRCA's share of costs for this acquisition are to be charged to
the TRCA land acquisition capital account.
Report prepared by: Jae Truesdell, extension 5247
Emails: jtruesdell @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223; Jae Truesdell, extension 5247
Emails: mfenning @trca.on.ca; jtruesdell @trca.on.ca
Date: October 07, 2013
Attachments: 2
407
Attachment 1
f
49 :--. '- - '.
,kr.c:3-'' . . e - - _ ,
_ _
r,,,,....,. r , : _ r . °‘° 0° .
° -
° '
"
,f ,f
6'
y
I
Ei°i'ik °ft.°I Pops!t' ox'""" .+ s -.."—.„0. p DU€L:4R
i
Legend Conservation SITE {° i4
To Caledon from TRCA REEL
TRCA Property
'
k Parce Assessment '° TORON70 j
3 e5 1 75 340 F"C 563 -- -
,.
— — .1freters 4
/ Key Map
',5, 6 ., n's Printer fa-Ontaro and its licensors.[2fCr5]May Note ReDrodud a,t gut Perrrsssik- T-113 3-NOT A FLAN OF SURVEY
408
Attachment 2
$
. �
- :•'',,,,,1-.-
� ..
f .., \ 1rAL
.
jj{JJII -
9...Q , /0 c, t t~r \k .
/ .
f
, . 10 j4-
1 f` y--rw I.
: 'r
'' - QURHRM
In,nmr.and Rrq uif .�`" YORK
Legend CAN nervation SITE
for Th, living t.'try
=To TRCA from Caledon PEEL
TRCA Property
j I Parcel Assessment °"T
0 230460 920 1 380 1 840 ^�,,, ". azra.iwoo
Meters •
Key Map
0 Queen's Pnnter for Ontario and its licensors r2OL5';Mai Not be Reproduced without Permission T-HS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY
409
RES.#A166/13 - OAK RIDGES CORRIDOR PARK EAST MANAGEMENT PLAN
UPDATE
Report back to the Authority confirming approval of the final management
plan.
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT the update confirming approval of the Oak Ridges Corridor Park East Managment
Plan by the Town of Richmond Hill and the Regional Municipality of York be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff work collaboratively with the Town of Richmond Hill, York
Region and the Community Stewardship Committee to implement the plan.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #8/11, held on September 30, 2011, Resolution #A180/11 adopted the
following recommendations:
THAT the draft Oak Ridges Corridor Park East Management Plan dated August 2011 be
approved in principle;
THAT the draft Plan be circulated to the Town of Richmond Hill and the Regional
Municipality of York requesting endorsement of the Plan;
THAT following circulation, staff report to the Authority to confirm approval of the final
Plan;
THAT the lands referred to as "Oak Ridges Corridor Park East" and"Oak Ridges Corridor
Park" respectively, be renamed and collectively referred to as the "Oak Ridges Corridor
Conservation Reserve";
THAT Province of Ontario approval of the use of the name "Oak Ridges Corridor
Conservation Reserve" for the provincial lands under management agreement be
requested;
AND FURTHER THAT the relevant stakeholders associated with the Oak Ridges Corridor
Park and Corridor Park East lands be advised of Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority's (TRCA) decision to use the name "Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Res
erve".
The Oak Ridges Corridor Park East Management Plan was subsequently endorsed by the
Town of Richmond Hill, at the Committee Of The Whole Meeting CW#15/11, held on November
7th, 2011, including a commitment for funding 50% of the cost to construct the primary spine
trail proposed in the Management Plan. The following motions were carried unanimously:
That the Oak Ridges Corridor Park East Management Plan (dated August 2011 and prepared
by Toronto and Region Conservation) be endorsed;
410
That the Town commit to funding 50% of the cost of the Oak Ridges Corridor Park East trail
system (contingent upon the TRCA's ability to secure the remaining 50% of required funds)
by incorporating the following items into the 10 year Capital Forecast
i) $360,000 for Primary Trail Construction in 2013, and
ii) $60,000 for Secondary Trail Construction in 2015
The Oak Ridges Corridor Park East Management Plan was subsequently endorsed by the
Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting on January 26, 2012. Council
adopted the following recommendations of the Environmental Services Committee regarding
the report entitled "Oak Ridges Corridor Park East Management Plan Town of Richmond Hill":
1. Council endorse the Oak Ridges Corridor Park East Management Plan as
prepared by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and recognize that
the capital funding contributions are limited to funds available through the
Pedestrian and Cycling Municipal Partnership Program.
2. The report be circulated by the Regional Clerk to the Town of Richmond Hill and
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
In 2013, the Regional Municipality of York committed $248,000 in funding toward Phase 1
construction of the multi-use spine trail proposed in the Management Plan. This funding is
committed through York Region's Pedestrian and Cycling Municipal Partnership Program. Staff
has issued a contract to construct the Phase 1 trail and the anticipated completion of this work
is December 2013. A Phase 2 trail funding proposal was submitted to York Region in
September 2013, which if funded, would complete the 5.5 kilometre long multi-use spine trail
on the property. This trail will link to the existing multi-use spine trail in Oak Ridges Corridor
Park, to create a continuous 10 kilometre trail from Bathurst Street to Bethesda Sideroad in
Richmond Hill.
While the Oak Ridges Corridor Park East Management Plan was completed prior to the
completion of TRCA's Building The Living City: 10-Year Strategic Plan 2013-2022, the
Management Plan aligns with many of the priorities outlined in Strategic Plan, including the
following objectives and actions:
• Create a network of greenspace and green infrastructure that weaves through every
community to connect a healthy and resilient landscape;
• More people engaging with nature more often;
• Improved protection of Toronto region's natural systems;
• Partner with municipalities to connect and promote a regional active transportation
network that facilitates physical activity and reduces air pollution while creating key
linkages between natural areas;
• Deliver experiences and programs that encourage life-long engagement and
stewardship of urban nature among a more diverse range of people;
• Work with our partners to identify and protect the significant spaces in our region that
are sensitive and ecologically important that will benefit from careful control of
community use;
• More community members contributing to watershed, community and sustainability
planning;
411
• Maximum impact from use of funds and resources through efficiencies and
partnerships;
• Work with our municipal, provincial and federal partners to assign the management of
public lands in order to make more efficient and effective use of our combined
resources.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The following work is being undertaken by TRCA staff:
• Approval from the Province of Ontario for formally renaming the provincially-owned
lands under the management agreement with TRCA, from Oak Ridges Corridor Park to
Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve;
• Completing Phase 1 Trail Development on the East Lands;
• Fund raising for Phase 2, the final phase of the spine trail development on the property;
• Implementing the remaining recommendations of the Management Plan.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds have been budgeted and are available to complete Phase 1 of the trail development on
the East Lands in account 442-23. This funding has been provided by York Region and the
Town of Richmond Hill.
Report prepared by: Steve Joudrey, extension 5573
Emails: sjoudrey @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Mike Bender, extension 5287
Emails: mbender @trca.on.ca
Date: October 01, 2013
RES.#A167/13 - 2013 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECTS
City of Toronto. Approval to proceed with the implementation of natural
environment and cycling infrastructure projects at the request of the City
of Toronto.
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be authorized to proceed
with the implementation of natural environment and cycling infrastructure (multi-use
trails) as approved and funded by the City of Toronto;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to take such action as is necessary, including
tendering of work and signing of contracts, to assist the City of Toronto in completing the
approved projects.
CARRIED
412
BACKGROUND
For many years TRCA has partnered with the City of Toronto to provide project design,
coordination of approvals and implementation services in support of City-led natural
environment projects throughout the City and across the Toronto waterfront.
Since 2006, the City of Toronto has continued to work in partnership with TRCA to design and
deliver these priority parkland naturalization, habitat protection and natural open space
enhancement projects at their request and on a cost recovery basis.
The City of Toronto has again requested TRCA's assistance in the planning and implementation
of a number of priority natural environment and cycling infrastructure improvement projects. A
list of approved 2013 projects and budgets is outlined in Attachment 1.
Staff continues to work cooperatively with City of Toronto staff from Parks, Forestry and
Recreation and Transportation-Cycling Infrastructure to facilitate project planning and approvals
in preparation for implementation.
RATIONALE
TRCA and the City of Toronto have a long history of working together on a number of
regeneration, public access and habitat enhancement projects. Many of these projects are on
TRCA-owned lands of which the City is responsible for management.
TRCA is recognized by the City of Toronto as being able to provide cost-effective management
of watershed-related projects due to highly specialized expertise, the ability to expedite
required approvals and permits, facilitate community involvement and meet tight timelines.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The Don Valley Brick Works Park project is being funded by a donation from the W. Garfield
Weston Foundation through The Living City Foundation.
All other expenditures made in the delivery and management of these approved projects are
fully reimbursable from the City of Toronto.
Tendering and purchases of goods and services will be conducted in accordance with TRCA's
Purchasing Policy.
Report prepared by: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378
Emails: drogalsky @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378
Emails: drogalsky @trca.on.ca
Date: October 1, 2013
Attachments: 1
413
Attachment 1
LOCATION AND FEATURE DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROJECT BUDGET
(Plus HST)
Don Valley Brick Works Park Trail rehabilitation and $400,000
improvements, closure
fencing, habitat protection,
interpretive signage installation
and replacement
Cottonwood Flats Implement songbird meadow $300,000
Regeneration - Phase 1 habitat protection and
enhancement, trail
formalization and closures,
installation of interpretive
features and signage
elements, state of good repair
Claireville/Hwy 427 West Construction of multi-use trail $700,000
Humber River Inter-Regional connection between
Trail Humberwood Park and
Claireville Dam -forming part
of the Pan-Am Path
Chorley Park Switchback Trail Design and construction of a $800,000
multi-use trail connection
between Chorley Park and the
Don Valley Brick Works
Mid-Humber Trail Design and construction of a $324,000
multi-use trail connection
between Cruickshank Park
and Mallaby Park (Weston) -
forming part of the Pan-Am
Path
East Point Park Bird Sanctuary Construction of viewing $419,000
pavilions, interpretive signage
and landscape elements
TOTAL $2,943,000
414
RES.#A168/13 - LANSING POND AND SISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH PROJECTS
RSD13-088 and RSD13-111 - Disposal of Stormwater Management Pond
Dredgeate. Award of Contract RSD13-088 Lansing Pond and RSD13-111
Sisters of St. Joseph Pond for disposal of stormwater management pond
dredgeate.
Moved by: John Sprovieri
Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick
THAT Contact RSD13-088 for the disposal of stormwater management pond (SWMP)
dredgeate for Lansing Pond, Scarborough, be awarded to Ground Force Environmental
for a total cost not to exceed $114,700.00, plus 25% contingency to be expended as
authorized by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff, plus HST, it being
the lowest bid meeting TRCA cost estimates and specifications;
THAT Contact RSD13-111 for the disposal of SWMP dredgeate for Sisters of St. Joseph
Pond, Scarborough, be awarded to Ground Force Environmental for a total cost not to
exceed $124,204.00, plus 25% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff,
plus HST, it being the lowest bid meeting TRCA cost estimates and specifications;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take any action necessary
to implement the agreement including obtaining any required approvals and the signing
and execution of documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
TRCA has entered a partnership with the City of Toronto, as authorized by Resolution #A141/13
at Authority Meeting #7/13, held on September 27, 2013. In spring 2013, the operations
division of Toronto Water approached TRCA's Restoration Services Division (RSD) to seek
opportunities for TRCA to assist with the management of their stormwater management ponds
(SWMPs). After the City identified seven priority ponds, RSD completed maintenance and
clean-out plans for the identified ponds. The City of Toronto has approved the budgets and
work proposed in the Sisters of St. Joseph Pond and Lansing Pond Clean-out and Maintenance
Plans.
The first pond to be cleaned out is Sisters of St. Joseph, which is located in the Don River
watershed, northwest of the intersection of St. Clair Avenue East and Warden Avenue in
Scarborough. This pond is at capacity for sediment volume, and without regular maintenance
(i.e., dredging) the pond cannot continue to provide flood control and water quality
management as designed. There are approximately 2,860 tonnes (1,300 cubic metres) of
sediment to be removed from the pond.
The second pond, Lansing Pond, is expected to be cleaned out after Sisters of St. Joseph.
Lansing Pond is located in the Highland Creek watershed, off of William Kitchen Road,
southeast of the intersection of Highway 401 and Kennedy Road in Scarborough. This pond is
at capacity for sediment volume, and without regular maintenance (i.e., dredging) the pond
cannot continue to provide flood control and water quality management as designed. There are
approximately 2,640 tonnes (1,200 cubic metres) sediment to be removed from the pond.
415
TRCA will dewater the ponds during dredging and manage flow to ensure the operation of the
ponds is maintained to provide downstream benefits. The sediment will be dewatered on site
and a variety of approved sediment control techniques will be used to ensure sediment is not
released downstream. The selected contractor will haul away the sediment and dispose of it at
a licensed facility that is operating under a Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Certificate of
Approval (C of A). The C of A is required because sediment sampling at both Sisters of St.
Joseph and Lansing Ponds revealed contamination levels that exceed the MOE's 2011
guidelines for Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property.
TRCA will complete Sisters of St. Joseph dredging in early October 2013. While sediment is
drying on-site at Sisters of St. Joseph, dredging will commence at Lansing Pond. After
approximately four weeks, weather permitting, sediment is expected to be dry enough to a
pass a slump test and be hauled away and disposed of at the appropriate facility. After
approximately four weeks of drying at Lansing Pond, weather permitting, sediment is expected
to be dry enough to pass a slump test and be hauled away and disposed of at the appropriate
facility.
RATIONALE
Requests for Quotation (RFQs) RSD13-088 and RSD13-111 were publicly advertised on the
electronic procurement website Biddingo (http://www.biddingo.com/) on September 9, 2013.
A mandatory site information meeting was held on September 12, 2013. RFQ packages were
sent to the following nine contractors that attended the site meeting:
• Best Value Contracting;
• Four Seasons Site Development;
• Ground Force Environmental;
• LocPave Construction;
• Metric Contracting Services Corporation;
• TBG Landscape Inc.;
• Tendescon Infrastructure Limited;
• Titanium Contracting;
• York Excavating.
As a condition of the RFQ, only bidders that operate under a MOE Certificate of Approval were
considered to undertake the disposal of the sediment.
The Quotations were received and opened by TRCA staff on Friday, September 20, 2013 with
the following results:
TOTAL TOTAL
(Plus HST) (Plus HST)
BIDDERS RSD13-088 - Lansing Pond RSD13-111 - Sisters of St.
2,640 Tonnes Joseph Pond
2,860 Tonnes
Ground Force Environmental $114,700.00 $124,204.00
Metric Contracting Services $200,480.00 $216,020.00
Corporation
416
Seven of the bidders declined to submit a proposal. York Excavating is part of the parent group
of Green For Life (GFL), who is the subcontractor of the lowest bidder, so York declined to bid.
TBG Landscape declined to bid due to staff resource limitations to prepare a bid. Several other
bidders indicated that this was a busy time of year with many projects underway and many
tenders being submitted.
TRCA reviewed the two bids received against its own cost estimate and has determined that the
lowest bid is of reasonable value and also meets the requirements and deliverables as outlined
on the contract documents. Ground Force Environmental stated in the bid that their waste
disposal subcontractor is Green For Life (GFL) Environmental Corporation. GFL is the Greater
Toronto Area's largest waste disposal contractor, and TRCA has contracted both Ground Force
and GFL for large projects in the past, such as the Lower Don River Flood Protection Landform.
Ground Force and GFL are capable of undertaking the scope of work.
Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Ground Force Environmental be awarded
Contract RSD13-088 and RSD13-111 for the disposal of SWMP dredgeate at Lansing and
Sisters of St. Joseph Ponds, Scarborough, for a total cost not to exceed $114,700.00, plus 25%
contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST; and $124,204.00, plus
25% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST respectively.
These projects are consistent with the TRCA's Strategic Plan, specifically: priority strategy #2
manage our regional water resources for current and future generations, and strategy #7 build
partnerships and new business models.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The cost of this contract is 100% recoverable from the City of Toronto, Toronto Water, District
Operations and Maintenance, within account 113-20.
Report prepared by: Natalie Hryshko, 416-991-0658; Lauren MacNeil, extension 5383
Emails: nhryshko @trca.on.ca; Imacneil @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: John DiRocco, extension 5231
Emails: jdirocco @trca.on.ca
Date: October 03, 2013
RES.#A169/13 - ALBION HILLS CONSERVATION AREA MASTER PLAN
Commencing the Albion Hills Conservation Area Master Plan.
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: David Barrow
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has undertaken several
site planning endeavors for the Albion Hills Conservation Area including the 1956 Plan for
Development, the 1980 Albion Hills Concept Plan within the Watershed Plan, the 2009
Albion Hills Trail Plan and several facility site plans;
417
AND WHEREAS no comprehensive Master Plan for the property since the 1980 Concept
Plan has been undertaken;
AND WHEREAS an updated and coordinated vision and plan is needed to protect the
natural and cultural heritage value of the property while still allowing for an enhancement
to the existing education and recreational facilities on the property;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA staff develop an Albion Hills
Conservation Area Master Plan;
THAT staff establish an Advisory Committee, which would include representatives from
the Aboriginal community, the Humber Watershed Alliance, interested community groups
and businesses, community residents, agency staff, municipal staff and Councillors to
assist with the development of the plan and to facilitate the opportunity for public input;
AND FURTHER THAT the draft Master Plan, as developed with the assistance of the
Albion Hills Master Plan Advisory Committee, be submitted to the Authority for approval.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Albion Hills Conservation Area (AHCA) is a large TRCA property, approximately 500 hectares in
size, located in the Main Humber subwatershed at the confluence of Centreville Creek and the
Main Humber. It is situated west of Regional Road 50, north of Old Church Road, east of
Humber Station Road and South of Patterson Sideroad. AHCA is entirely within Peel Region
and in the Township of Caledon. AHCA has been operating as an active nature based
recreational facility since opening its gates in 1955, at which time made it the first active use
conservation area in the Province of Ontario.
A Plan for Development for the Albion Hills Conservation Area (PFD) was developed in 1956.
This document set goals for the property and set the stage for the development of several key
pieces of infrastructure that are still in use today such as the internal road network, the Albion
dam and a good proportion of the property's site services.
The next major vision for the properties was set during the writing of the 1980 Watershed Plan.
At this time a concept plan for the property was included within the Plan's Watershed
Recreation Program (1980) component. The vision at this time, re-established Metropolitan
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (MTRCA) goal to make the property available to
the public for recreation and educational purposes. Recommendations were also made to
preserve the agricultural uses within the property boundaries.
Subsequently in both Legacy:A Strategy for a Healthy Humber (1997) and Pathways to a
Healthy Humber (2008), AHCA was reaffirmed by MTRCA as a key public use feature. Pathways
took the extra step of identifying AHCA as a destination within Hills of the Headwaters public
use theme. Both of these documents did not however elaborate on the site-specific planning
efforts.
418
Between 2009 and 2010, under support from the Recreational Infrastructure Canada program
(RInC), TRCA undertook a reworking of the trails within AHCA and the associated way-finding
system in the form of a detailed property trail plan and implementation program. This
undertaking set a strong direction for trail location, management and way finding on the
properties and also provided key trail infrastructure improvements across the entirety of AHCA.
In addition to these larger planning endeavors, project specific site plans were developed as
improvements were made to the conservation area facilities. A recent example of this type of
work is the improved Albion splash pad.
As a result of these planning processes, TRCA has expanded its operations within AHCA to
include a wide variety of recreational opportunities including over 40 km of trails, the 24 Hours
of Summer Solstice mountain biking event, cross country skiing, swimming opportunities,
camping, picnicking and canoeing. In addition to the recreational opportunities offered within
AHCA, two separate educational facilities, one operated by the Toronto District School Board
and the other by TRCA currently, offer residential outdoor education programs to school
children. Also operated on the AHCA property is the Albion Hills Community Farm, a
community-based farm collaborative.
In combination with being a premier nature based recreation and education facility, AHCA
contains many different habitats including upland and bottomland forests, old fields and
wetlands, making it a key local and regional natural heritage site.
Archaeological surveys conducted on the property since 1973 and a high level cultural heritage
review of the property have also revealed that people have been living in the Albion Hills area
since the end of the last ice age. This coupled with a rich recent history also make the property
a key cultural heritage site in the region.
RATIONALE
The Master Plan will integrate and enable a number of TRCA initiatives, most notably Building
The Living City, the new 10 year strategic plan for TRCA. Specifically this Master Plan will help
TRCA achieve the strategy of rethinking its greenspace and help maximize its value (Strategy
#3). TRCA will do this by positioning AHCA within the context of not only the surrounding
natural areas, but also the surrounding rural community and its associated rich cultural
heritage.
In order to best achieve The Living City vision, the Master Plan will address a variety of issues
within AHCA including:
• reaffirming AHCA's position within the Hills of the Headwaters and the Caledon rural
community;
• continued protection of both natural and cultural heritage systems;
• recommendations for existing and new recreational and educational activities;
• recommendations for implementing site appropriate restoration projects;
• recommendations for appropriate agricultural use of the property within the context of the
existing Albion Hills Community Farm;
• recommendations regarding site securement and protection of the property.
419
Because of the extensive community involvement that will be integrated into the development of
this plan, this planning process provides a key opportunity to continue to foster sustainable
citizenship in the local area by building on the outreach of the plan advisory committee and the
public meetings that are to be incorporated into the planning process.
The AHCA Master plan will provide an overall structure and direction to guide future initiatives
on the property. Given the dramatic population growth expected across the region, demand for
nature-based recreation facilities is likewise expected to grow. This plan will provide an
opportunity to review existing recreational uses and management practices to ensure that the
property remains positioned as a premier nature based recreation and education facility in the
Greater Toronto Area.
The Master Plan will also build on and support several additional key initiatives and plans within
TRCA including:
• Humber Watershed Plan: Pathways to a Healthy Humber;
• The Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy; and
• The Restoration Opportunities Plan for the Humber Watershed.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The Master Plan will use an ecosystem approach to determine the most appropriate
management recommendations for the site, as well as locations of future activities and
nature-based public use. The first step will be the completion of the draft AHCA background
report that will identify planning context, current land uses, policies, natural and cultural
heritage resources, as well as public uses, recreation trends and demographic analysis.
Using this information, management zones will be developed that integrate the need to protect
important areas while still allowing for the continued operation of the property as an active
nature-based recreation and education facility. The management plan will also contain
management guidelines, including restoration areas, a recreation and facilities plan, and an
implementation strategy outlining preliminary costs for the implementation of the Master Plan.
The development of the AHCA Master Plan will follow a similar model that has been
successfully implemented at properties including Heart Lake, Bruce's Mill and Greenwood
conservation lands. The planning process will be undertaken in the three phases:
Phase One: Project Initiation
• complete background report including site securement and protection recommendations;
• establish public and staff advisory committees and host required meetings;
• host a public information session;
• circulate a study newsletter;
• conduct an AHCA public survey;
• develop draft plan vision, goals and objectives.
Phase Two: Component Development
• determine draft management zones;
• integrate watershed management recommendations;
• develop draft trail, recreation and facilities plans;
• host a public meeting;
• circulate a study newsletter.
420
Phase Three: Project Finalization
• develop final management recommendations;
• develop an implementation strategy and budget;
• host a public meeting;
• circulate a study newsletter;
• obtain municipal partner endorsement;
• obtain partner and TRCA board endorsement.
As part of the planning process, an advisory committee will be created to assist in determining
the appropriate direction for the property. TRCA will invite representatives from the community,
special interest groups and partners to sit on the committee for the duration of the project. The
advisory committee members will play an integral role in developing goals, objectives and
management recommendations for the AHCA. The following groups should be represented on
the committee:
• local Aboriginal communities;
• Town of Caledon;
• Peel Region;
• Humber Watershed Alliance;
• local community;
• local businesses;
• special interest groups;
• property users;
• TRCA.
The management plan is expected to be completed in early 2015. Operation of AHCA and any
already planned or shovel-ready projects will continue throughout the master planning process.
Implementation of the master plan will begin in 2015.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Project funding is available as part of the Peel Region Conservation Land Care budget, in
account 440-57
Report prepared by: Adam Szaflarski, extension 5596
Emails: aszaflarski @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Adam Szaflarski, extension 5596; Mike Bender, extension 5287
Emails: aszaflarski @trca.on.ca or mbender @trca.on.ca
Date: October 11, 2013
RES.#A170/13 - HIGHLAND CREEK DOWNSTREAM OF MORNINGSIDE AVENUE
EROSION CONTROL PROJECT
Contract RSD13-125. Award of Contract RSD13-125 for the supply and
delivery of approximately 2,500 tonnes of 2-4 tonne stackable
armourstone.
421
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT Contract RSD13-125 for the supply and delivery of approximately 2,500 tonnes of
2-4 tonne stackable armourstone to the Highland Creek Downstream of Morningside
Avenue Erosion Control Project in the City of Toronto, be awarded to C.D.R Young's
Aggregates Inc. for a total unit price of$47.80 per tonne and a total cost not to exceed
$119,500.00, plus a contingency of 20% to be expended as authorized by Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff, plus HST, it being the lowest bidder meeting
TRCA specifications;
THAT should staff be unable to achieve an acceptable contract with the awarded
suppliers, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the
other suppliers that submitted quotations, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting
TRCA specifications;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take all necessary actions
to implement the foregoing, including the signing and execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
TRCA is proposing to stabilize a section of eroding bank of the Highland Creek located south of
Ellesmere Road and east of Morningside Avenue. The eroding bank is situated on the north
bank of Highland Creek approximately 130 metres downstream of the Morningside Avenue
Bridge, in the City of Toronto.
The eroding bank is located downstream of emergency works completed by TRCA in 2008, on
behalf of Toronto Water. The purpose of the emergency works was to protect the Morningside
Avenue Bridge footings, a Bell Canada communications conduit and restore an eroded section
of asphalt pedestrian pathway. The emergency works consisted of both channel bed and bank
treatments, which were designed by Parish Geomorphic Ltd.
On October 24, 2011, City of Toronto staff notified TRCA of erosion affecting the current area of
concern located downstream of the aforementioned 2008 emergency works. TRCA staff
inspected the area of concern on the same day and recommended timely implementation of
stabilization works to the City of Toronto in order to address the potential risk to public safety as
a result of the ongoing erosion at the site. As a result, the City of Toronto requested TRCA
determine the level of impact from the emergency works on the area of concern, and to
undertake additional works, as required, to augment the existing channel works to address the
current risk to public safety, and to mitigate any potential transference of impact downstream of
the area of concern.
Staff note that path relocation has been eliminated as a viable option as there is a wetland
immediately north of the affected path, which is protected as a Ministry of Natural Resources
Area of Natural &Scientific Interest (ANSI).
The 2-4 tonne stackable armourstone will be used for the retaining wall and construction for the
bendway weirs as part of the approved bank stabilization works.
422
RATIONALE
This project is aligned with leadership strategy number two in TRCA's new strategic plan.
Through improvements of the flow regime, this project will assist in the successful management
of our regional water resources for current and future generations.
Tender packages were sent to 18 suppliers as follows:
• Brock Aggregates Inc. • TBG Landscape
• CDR Young's Aggregates Inc. • Rock Valley Natural Stone
• Glenn Windrem Trucking • Bot Construction
• James Dick Construction Limited • Walker Aggregates Inc.
• J.C. Rock Limited • Cambridge Aggregates
• Miller Paving Limited • Doughty Aggregates
• Nelson Aggregate Co. • Limestone and Forestry Products
• B-Town Group • Mountsberg Excavating
• Strada Aggregates • Terrafix Geosynthetics Inc.
Tender RSD13-125 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo
th
http://www.biddingo.com/) on Wednesday September 11 , 2013. The Procurement Opening
Committee opened tenders on Thursday, September 26th, 2013 with the following results:
Contract RSD13-125- Supply and Delivery of Approximately 2,500 tonnes of 2-4 tonne
Stackable Armourstone
TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL VALUE OF
BIDDERS PER TONNE CONTRACT
(Plus HST) (Plus HST)
C.D.R Young's Aggregates $47.80 $119,500.00
B-Town Group $49.80 $124,500.00
Glenn Windrem Trucking $52.00 $130,000.00
Dufferin Aggregates $54.32 $135,800.00
J.C. Rock Limited $57.00 $142,500.00
Based on the bids received, staff recommends that C.D.R Young's Aggregates be awarded
Contract RSD13-125 for the supply and delivery of approximately 2,500 tonnes of 2-4 tonne
stackable armourstone for the unit cost of$47.80 per tonne and a total cost not to exceed
$119,500.00 plus HST; it being the lowest bidder meeting TRCA staff specifications. The
contract is subject to a 20% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available from the City of Toronto in TRCA's 2013 Erosion Health and Safety Budget
under account 186-28.
423
Report prepared by: Jordan Budway, 416-392-9721
Emails: jbudway @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: James Dickie, 416-392-9702
Emails: jdickie @trca.on.ca
Date: September 27, 2013
RES.#A171/13 - MEETING SCHEDULE 2014-2015
To provide a schedule of board meetings for year, beginning February
28, 2014 and ending January 30, 2015.
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT the Schedule of Meetings 2014-2015, dated September 20, 2013, be approved;
THAT the Executive Committee be delegated the powers of the Authority during the
month of August, 2014, as defined in Section 2.10 of the Rules of Conduct;
AND FURTHER THAT the CEO's Office distribute this schedule at the earliest opportunity
to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) watershed municipalities and the
Ministry of Natural Resources.
CARRIED
RATIONALE
Since almost all members of TRCA sit on councils, boards or committees which usually meet
on days other than Friday, the schedule accommodates TRCA board meetings on Fridays.
Staff has made every effort to avoid conflicts with municipal council meetings, Federation of
Canadian Municipalities' annual conference, statutory holidays and school March breaks, in
selecting the proposed meeting days.
An Authority meeting is not scheduled in the month of August due to summer vacations. To
accommodate the large number of permit requests at this time, an Executive Committee
meeting is scheduled. Should an item require Authority approval at this time, Section 2.10 of
the Authority's Rules of Conduct permits the Authority to delegate its powers to the Executive
Committee:
2.10 to exercise such additional powers, excluding those powers set out in Clause (d)
of Subsection (1) of Section 30 of the Act, as may be assigned to it by the
Authority during the months of July and August provided that a report be given to
the Authority at the first meeting of the Authority thereafter;
Staff is recommending powers be assigned to the Executive Committee for August, 2014, with
the required report being brought to the Authority at its meeting proposed to be held on
September 19, 2014. Staff is also recommending that the August Executive Committee
meeting be conducted with the option of teleconferencing due to the lighter agenda, unless
otherwise advised as a result of items scheduled.
424
At Authority Annual Meeting #1/02, held on January 25, 2002, Resolution #A6/02 was
approved in part as follows:
THAT the dates of future Annual Meetings be changed to accommodate the budget
meeting schedule for our member municipalities, such that the Annual Meeting held
following a municipal election be in January while the Annual Meetings in the interim two
years between elections be moved to February;
In accordance with Resolution #A6/02, the 2015 annual Authority meeting is proposed to be
held on Friday, January 30, 2015. The January and February 2014 meetings were previously
approved in Meeting Schedule 2013-2014, but are provided below for assistance in updating
calendars.
All meetings will be held at Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV). The Authority and Executive
Committee meetings will be held at 9:30 a.m.. The Budget/Audit Advisory Board (BAAB)
meetings will be held at 8:30 a.m.
Members are requested to enter all board meetings in their calendars upon receipt of the
annual schedule. Members are further requested to schedule to be in attendance at Authority
and Executive Committee meetings until at least 1:30 p.m. to ensure quorum is maintained.
Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
Date: September 20, 2013
Attachments: 1
425
Attachment 1
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING SCHEDULE 2014-2015
JANUARY 2014 TIME DESCRIPTION
January 10 9:30 a.m. Authority #10/13
January 17 9:30 a.m. Executive #11/13
January 31 9:30 a.m. Authority #11/13
FEBRUARY 2014 TIME DESCRIPTION
February 7 9:30 a.m. Executive #12/13
February 28 10:30 a.m. ANNUAL Authority
#1/14
Note: January and February 2014 meetings already approved in the Meeting Schedule 2013-2014
MARCH 2014 ' TIME DESCRIPTION
March 7 9:30 a.m. Executive #1/14
March 28 9:30 a.m. Authority #2/14
APRIL 2014 TIME I DESCRIPTION
April 11 8:30 a.m. BAAB #1/14
April 11 9:30 a.m. Executive #2/14
April 25 9:30 a.m. Authority #3/14
MAY 2014 TIME DESCRIPTION
May 2 9:30 a.m. Executive #3/14
May 23 9:30 a.m. Authority #4/14
JUNE 2014 TIME DESCRIPTION
June 6 9:30 a.m. Executive #4/14
June 20 8:30 a.m. BAAB #2/14
June 20 9:30 a.m. Authority #5/14
JULY 2014 TIME DESCRIPTION
July 4 9:30 a.m. Executive #5/14
July 25 9:30 a.m. Authority #6/14
k AUGUST 2014 TIME DESCRIPTION
August 8 9:30 a.m. Executive #6/14
SEPTEMBER 2014 TIME DESCRIPTION
September 5 9:30 a.m. Executive #7/14
September 19 9:30 a.m. Authority #7/14
426
OCTOBER 2014 • TIME DESCRIPTION
October 10 8:30 a.m. BAAB #3/14
October 10 9:30 a.m. Executive #8/14
October 31 9:30 a.m. Authority #8/14
NOVEMBER 2014 TIME DESCRIPTION
November 7 9:30 a.m. Executive #9/14
November 28 9:30 a.m. Authority #9/14
DECEMBER 2014 TIME DESCRIPTION
December 12 9:30 a.m. Executive #10/14
JANUARY 2015 TIME DESCRIPTION
January 9 9:30 a.m. Authority #10/14
January 16 9:30 a.m. Executive #11/14
January 30 10:30 a.m. Annual Authority #1/15
1. All meetings will be held in Weston Room B, Visitor's Centre, Black Creek Pioneer Village
(BCPV), 1000 Murray Ross Parkway, Downsview, Ontario, unless otherwise noted on the
agenda.
2. Authority and Executive Committee meetings will be held at 9:30 a.m. until 1:30 p.m.,
unless otherwise noted on the agenda.
3. ALL Budget/Audit Advisory Board (BAAB) meetings will be held at 8:30 a.m. unless
otherwise noted on the agenda.
4. Members are requested to be present for the entire meeting time as not doing so puts
quorum at risk. The per diem and mileage attendance sheet provided at each meeting
must be signed by all members in attendance at meetings.
For further information, please contact Kathy Stranks at 416-661-6600, extension 5264 or Judith
Reda at extension 5254.
427
RES.#A172/13 - 2014 PRELIMINARY CAPITAL AND OPERATING ESTIMATES
Recommends approval of 2014 preliminary capital and operating budget
estimates and guidelines.
(Budget/Audit Resolution #C10/13)
Moved by: David Barrow
Seconded by: Deb Schulte
THAT the preliminary estimates for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA)
2014 -2023 participating municipal capital and special project budgets, as outlined in
Attachment 2, be approved for submission to the respective municipalities;
THAT the preliminary estimates for the 2014 operating budget make provision for a cost
of living adjustment of two percent (2%) effective in April, 2014 (Attachment 1);
THAT the preliminary estimates for the 2014 operating budget include municipal levy
increases consistent with the guidelines determined by the respective participating
municipality;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to submit the 2014 preliminary estimates to the
City of Toronto, the regional municipalities of Peel, York and Durham, the Town of Mono
and the Township of Adjala-Tosorontio in accordance with their respective submission
schedules.
CARRIED
RES.#A173/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed
Cougs (Tillings) Ltd., CFN 49836. Acquisition of property located south
of 4th Concession Road and west of Brock Road in the City of Pickering,
Regional Municipality of Durham, under the 'Greenlands Acquisition
Project for 2011-2015', Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins
Creek watershed.
(Executive Res.#B120/13)
Moved by: Colleen Jordan
Seconded by: Gloria Linsday Luby
THAT 1.103 hectares (2.725 acres), more or less, of vacant land, being Part of Lot 20,
Concession 3 and designated as block 132 on draft M-Plan prepared by J.D. Barnes
Limited, reference no. 09-25-146-07, located south of 4th Concession Road and west of
Brock Road, City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, be purchased from
Cougs (Tillings) Ltd.;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
428
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land
free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT TRCA solicitors, Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at
the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A174/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Etobicoke Creek Watershed
Argo Caledon Corporation, CFN 49838. Acquisition of property located
east of Highway No. 10, south of Old School Road, Town of Caledon,
Regional Municipality of Peel, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project
for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Etobicoke
Creek watershed.
(Executive Res.#B 121/13)
Moved by: Colleen Jordan
Seconded by: Gloria Linsday Luby
THAT 8.88 hectares (21.94 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lots 20 and
21, Concession 1 EHS and designated as Blocks 415, 416 and 417 on a Draft Plan of
Subdivision prepared by Rady-Pentek & Edward Surveying Ltd., under their Job No.
13-072, dated June 26, 2013, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, located east
of Highway No. 10, south of Old School Road, be purchased from Argo Caledon
Corporation;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the
lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest
possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
429
RES.#A175/13 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND
Adjacent to 163 Thistledown Boulevard, City of Toronto - Etobicoke York
Community Council Area, CFN 48216. Declaring surplus a parcel of
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority-owned land located adjacent
to 163 Thistledown Boulevard, City of Toronto - Etobicoke York
Community Council Area, Humber River watershed.
(Executive Res.#8122/13)
Moved by: Colleen Jordan
Seconded by: Gloria Linsday Luby
THAT a parcel of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) land, being Part of
Block B, Registered Plan 3857, located adjacent to 163 Thistledown Boulevard, City of
Toronto - Etobicoke York Community Council Area, Humber River watershed, be declared
surplus to the requirements of TRCA;
THAT staff be authorized to enter into negotiations with Mr. Brent McKee, owner of 163
Thistledown Boulevard, for an exchange of lands with TRCA;
AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future
date with the results of the negotiations.
CARRIED
RES.#A176/13 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY LAND
North of King Street East, East of Old King Road (Rear of 269 King Street
East - Bolton), CFN 42978. Disposition of a parcel of Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority land located north of King Street East, east of Old
King Road (rear of 269 King Street East - Bolton), Town of Caledon,
Regional Municipality of Peel, Humber River watershed.
(Executive Res.#8123/13)
Moved by: Colleen Jordan
Seconded by: Gloria Linsday Luby
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from Bill and Gillian Smillie to
sell a small fragment of TRCA-owned land to resolve a long standing encroachment,
located adjacent to 269 King Street East - Bolton, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality
of Peel;
AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in
Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to complete a sale to Mr. and Mrs. Smillie
in this instance;
430
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a small fragment of TRCA-owned land
containing 0.009 hectares (0.022 acres), more or less, be sold to Mr. and Mrs. Smillie,
said land being Part of Lot G, Block 1, Plan BOL-7, shown as a portion of Part 3 on Plan
43R-13764, located north of King Street East, east of Old King Road (rear of 269 King
Street East- Bolton), Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, Humber River
watershed;
THAT TRCA complete the sale of the subject land on the following terms and conditions:
(a) the sale price is to be the sum of$65.00 per square metre based on the area of the
property as certified by an Ontario Land Surveyor (i.e. 90 square metres x$65.00 =
$5,850.00);
(b) the completion of this sale will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be
required to sever the lands to be sold;
(c) Mr. and Mrs. Smillie are to pay all legal, survey and other costs, including any fees
required for municipal approvals (such as consent to sever/ minor variance
applications, rezoning, Site Plan Control application, etc.) as deemed necessary by
the Town of Caledon;
(d) the cost and construction of an appropriate fence along the new common property
boundary, including the removal of the existing fence presently located on TRCA,
will be the responsibility of Mr. and Mrs. Smillie, including obtaining permission
from TRCA pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06;
(e) the transaction is to be completed at the earliest possible date with payment in full
to TRCA in cash upon closing;
THAT the sale be subject to approval by the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance
with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as
amended;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A177/13 - OAK RIDGES MORAINE LAND TRUST
Management Agreement for Operation and Management of the Ken
Purvis Nature Reserve
Duffins Creek Watershed
Township of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of Durham, CFN 48094.
Recommending entering into a management agreement with the Oak
Ridges Moraine Land Trust for the operation and management of the Ken
Purvis Nature Reserve, in the Township of Uxbridge.
(Executive Res.#8124/13)
431
Moved by: Colleen Jordan
Seconded by: Gloria Linsday Luby
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into a management
agreement with the Oak Ridges Moraine Land Trust (ORMLT) to operate and manage the
Ken Purvis Nature Reserve, being Part of Lot 6, Concession 7, containing 6.88 hectares
(17 acres), located in the Township of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of Durham;
THAT the agreement be based substantially on the principles set out in this staff report
dated September 16th, 2013;
THAT the final terms and conditions of the agreement be satisfactory to TRCA staff and
solicitors;
AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever actions
may be required to give effect thereto including obtaining the needed approvals and
signing and execution of documents.
CARRIED
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES.#A178/13 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by: David Barrow
Seconded by: Deb Schulte
THAT Section II item EX8.1 - Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve - East Spine Trail
Project- Phase 1, contained in Executive Committee Minutes #8/13, held on October 4,
2013, be received.
CARRIED
SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
RES.#A179/13 - GOOD NEWS STORIES
Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority activities from
July - September, 2013.
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Linda Pabst
THAT the summary of Good News Stories from July- September, 2013 be received.
CARRIED
432
BACKGROUND
As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlights of Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority's (TRCA) activities for the preceding few months is provided to the
Authority every few months. The stories for October- December, 2013 are as follows:
Summer
• The Mountain Equipment Co-op (MEC) funded Conservation Canoe Program was launched
in July. We introduced 60 new Canadians, 72 high school students and 40 park visitors to
the recreational sport of canoeing.
• The 3rd annual Conservation Youth Corps (CYC) program provided 104 high school
students from Peel Region and York Region with a total of 3,640 volunteer hours required
for high school graduation.
• Treetop Trekking at Heart Lake Conservation Area opened to the public on August 1st. The
course received rave reviews as well as record opening day and weekend numbers for
Treetop Trekking.
• Black Creek Pioneer Village has received a donation of$40,000 to restore the Mill Wheel
from George Weston Limited.
• Thirty students received a grade 12 credit after completing the 36th Boyd Archaeological
Field School. They helped excavate the Sebastien Site, a Middle Iroquoian village site in
north Pickering. The course is run with collaboration with First Nations and this year, a First
Nations student from Georgia Island was one of the graduates.
• On June 6th, 2013, Partners in Project Green launched its new strategic direction, focussing
on four key performance areas: energy performance, water stewardship, waste
management, and communications and engagement to drive sustainable operational
excellence, and develop new capacity for advancing sustainability innovation in the Pearson
Eco-Business Zone.
• The People Power Challenge launched its third contest on July 1st in the area of
Transportation. Companies in the Pearson Eco-Business Zone are now helping their staff
find sustainable transportation solutions to decrease emissions and improve employee
well-being.
• Partners in Project Green has recruited eight large industrial companies to participate in its
Energy Leaders Consortium, which drives down energy use and costs by collaboratively
engaging energy professionals to learn from each other's projects, share resources and
expertise, and strategize solutions to mutual challenges. Participating companies include
Campbells Company of Canada, Canadian Tire, Chrysler, GTAA, Lincoln Electric,
Molson-Coors, Pratt and Whitney Canada, and Sons Bakery, where the first meeting will be
held on September 27th.
• A successful water bus tour was held on June 21st where members of PPG had a rare
opportunity to learn about water management directly from the businesses operating within
Pearson Eco-Business Zone. Tour stops included the Pearson Airport's Moores Creek
Stormwater facility, the Region of Peel Lorne Park Water Treatment Facility and the Marriott
Toronto Airport Hotel.
• We had a very successful first Water Stewardship Performance Committee meeting held on
August 7th. With all stakeholders (municipal, corporate and industry experts) agreeing to
explore how they could take one of the two proposed collective water resource
management projects. Corporate partners sitting on the committee include Unilever,
Molson-Coors, Monteco and RBC. We hope to continue the momentum into our next
meeting scheduled on September 16th.
433
• In June 2013, an exchange took place between Sears and Jacobs-Thompson. The
exchange for one gaylord box of corner board protectors to be used in shipping. Since
then, Jacobs-Thompson engaged their packing solutions provider to work with Partners in
Project Green to develop a used corner board offering to all of their existing clients. Over
the summer, Trent University and Ryerson University joined the Ontario Climate Consortium
with a commitment of funding to support research and action on climate change.
• The Monarch Teacher Network of Canada program received a donation of just over
$5,000.00 worth of books from children's author, Frank Glew, to support ecological literacy
initiatives promoted through TRCA. In addition to offering the book at the Monarch
workshops, That Chickadee Feeling and Butterfly Wishes (books) will be given to classes
participating in Winged Migration program to promote continued engagement after the field
trip.
• Despite the low numbers of Monarch butterflies migrating north this spring and summer, the
Monarch Teacher Network of Canada program held 7 workshops: Winkler (MB), Toronto,
Thunder Bay, South Mountain, York Region, Peel Region, and Niagara Falls (ON).
Workshops were generously supported by The W. Garfield Weston Foundation, Toronto
Dominion Friends of the Environment Fund, Ontario EcoCentres, and York Region District
School Board.
• Completed the Procedure for Laboratory Testing of Oil Grit Separators for the Canadian
Environmental Technology Verification Program.
• 286 campers engaged at Kortright Centre in a new model of summer camp which included
offering campers an optional overnight and different environmentally themed programs
each week. Camp ran during six weeks of the summer. Themes included Amazing
Animals, Music and Art in Nature, Leadership Adventure Camp, Survival Camp, Science
Camp and Nature Spy Camp. Partnerships with McMichael Canadian Art Collection and
Dynamix Team Building were established to assist with program development and delivery
of two of the themed weeks (Music and Art in Nature and Leadership Adventure Camp).
• In addition to offering programming at Kortright Nature Day Camp, Kortright partnered with
York Region District School Board (YRDSB) Summer Institutes to develop and deliver
outdoor field trips for their summer camp participants. This included Kortright staff leading
full day programs for 71 field trips at Bruce's Mill, 90 field trips to Kortright, and 12 half day
off-site experiences at two different York Region District School Board schools (Crosby
Heights and Lake Wilcox elementary schools). This partnership secured an additional
$92,352 in revenues from YRDSB.
September
• Agreement in principle with Hydro One Brampton to conduct 150-200 energy assessments
before the end of 2013, through the Partners in Project Green program.
• Alfred Kuehne Blvd. Stream Naturalization project withstood the July 8th storm event even
though it was still in process of being constructed. Project was completed with minimum
repairs after the event.
• TRCA and the University of Toronto School of Environment received a$110,000 grant from
the Canadian Water Network to improve management of road impacts on fish and wildlife in
TRCA watersheds.
• 500 attended the San Romano Way kick off SNAP event. Residents were pleased with the
consultation process and being asked for input.
434
• On September 14, 2013, the Huron-Wendat Nation (HWN), in partnership with Ontario
Heritage Trust (OHT), University of Toronto and TRCA, undertook the reburial of aboriginal
ancestral remains at the Thonnakona burial site near Kleinburg. More than 1,700 individual
remains from a number of ossuaries were returned to this site to be reburied. TRCA was
instrumental in assisting OHT in providing the HWN with a permanent resting place for the
Ancestors.
• TRCA is partnering with the City of Pickering to fund the installation of a stormwater
treatment device that will provide water quality control for 30 hectares of the Petticoat Creek
watershed.
• $300,000 received from Weston Foundation Parks Challenge, for the development of the
Scarborough Centre Butterfly Trail which is the conversion of a mown electrical
transmission corridor adjacent to a multi-use trail to a lush habitat meadow in the Gatineau
Corridor. This is a partnership between The Living City Foundation, City of Toronto, Hydro
One, Rural Lambton Habitat Network and local community volunteers.
• Heart Lake Dragon Boat festival was a success, and the TRCA Boyd team was the
champions. A total of$3,500 was raised in pledges towards the restoration of the Etobicoke
watershed.
• Climate Consortium received $130,000 from NRCan to assess climate risks and
opportunities for key elements of Ontario's electrical transmission grid.
• Tommy Thompson Park butterfly festival had over 2,000 attendees.
• Approved for$200,000 from Fisheries and Oceans Canada for development of fish habitat
at Tommy Thompson Park.
• Successful in obtaining clearance from City of Vaughan Building Standards Department to
enable TRCA to now apply to the LLBO for a permanent liquor licence for the Kortright
Visitors Centre for weddings and other events.
• Matt Galloway series on new communities in Toronto doing story on Mimico. Interviews are
extolling the virtues of the work being done on the waterfront.
• The Multicultural Connections Program hosted a"Learn to Golf" day at Bathurst Glen Golf
course for 60 participants from the Welcome Centre Immigrant Services in Vaughan.
• TRCA supported the David Suzuki Foundation's Homegrown Park Crawl through Ward 19 in
Toronto on Sunday, September 29th. Staff joined the parade to talk to participants about
native plants and engaged 250 people with TRCA's Storm Drain Model at our display booth
at Trinity Bellwoods Park. We painted 34 storm drains and delivered 140 flyers to
neighbourhood homes. We handed out an additional 100 household hazardous waste
flyers at the TRCA display.
Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
Date: October 7, 2013
RES.#A180/13 - IN THE NEWS
July - September 2013. Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority activities for July to September, 2013.
435
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Linda Pabst
THAT the summary of media coverage from July- September, 2013 be received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlights of Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority's (TRCA) news coverage for the preceding few months is provided to
the Authority quarterly. The stories for July - September 30, 2013 are as follows:
Media Coverage Highlights
A search on a news archives database (FP Infomart) for the period from July - September, 2013
that mentioned TRCA or Black Creek Pioneer Village and other TRCA properties (example:
Tommy Thompson Park) produced 61 media mentions. The total media hits resulted in a total
circulation/reach of more than 7,400,000 with a total advertising value of$262,000. The
extensive media coverage of the July 8th storm and resultant flooding also contributed to the
increased traffic over Twitter bringing attention to the roles and responsibilities that TRCA has
with flood management.
These results only reflect a portion of media coverage, since the database does not monitor
on-line media, event listings, broadcast radio/tv interviews, smaller community papers and
trade publications.
The highlights below are examples of noteworthy media coverage received.
July
• Brampton Guardian story "Localized flooding alert issued as heavy downpours predicted
for Sunday" reports that heavy rainfall predicted for much of southern Ontario Sunday night
has prompted an alert from Toronto and Region Conservation. July 7
th
• July 8 storm produced a flurry of print and broadcast media coverage. Some highlights
include:
• thestar.com "Toronto flooding: 'Lost' rivers reappear when nature takes charge". July
9
• North York Mirror"TORONTO FLOOD: Protect children from swollen rivers, authority
warns more rain and possible thunderstorms are expected Tuesday." July 9
• The Toronto Sun "Toronto: Soggy, but still standing". July 10
• globeandmail.com "floodwater covers the rails, it's time for the train to stop". July 9
• The Globe and Mail "One-two punch overloads infrastructure; Flash flooding
widespread as Toronto area hit with more rain in one day than it normally gets for
the entire month of July." July 9
• Toronto Star"Storm has homeowners on the edge of disaster; Residents fear for
house after half of backyard slides into valley following record thunderstorms". July
13
• Scarborough Mirror story "Scarborough volunteers sought to spread word about ash borer
beetle" describes how the die-off of Toronto ash trees continues, and volunteers are being
sought in Scarborough. Story also includes the work of the Highland Creek Green Team.
July 15
436
• York Guardian story "York residents demand action in wake of flooding" reports on public
information session hosted by York South-Weston Councillor Frances Nunziata to provide
answers about the July 8 flood. July 24
• Beach Mirror story "Butterflies, flowers and various wildlife found on Leslie Street Spit" is
about one person's experience at Tommy Thompson Park. July 24
• Scarborough Mirror story "Highland Creek Watershed hike shows need for trees"
showcases the work of the Highland Creek Green Team at a recent public event at
Morningside Park, and highlights some of the challenges in the park such as invasive plant
species, and the emerald ash borer. July 24
• East York-Riverdale-Leaside Mirror story "Hike through Taylor Creek Park shows off Don
Valley In East York" describes the numerous trails around the Don Valley and includes
information about TRCA's Walk the Don Series. July 24
• Toronto Star story "TTC struggles to get name of new subway station right and tight" reports
how the board voted to cut words from Black Creek Pioneer Village Station to make name
fit. July 25
• Toronto Star story "Putting money where the Don's mouth is" reports on TRCA's plans for
the re-naturalization of the mouth of the Don and the public meeting that took place on July
25. The columnist writes that the July 8th flood event was not just a wake-up call but a
reminder of why 21st century infrastructure will look a lot more like the past then the future
with the restoration of natural processes we have previously destroyed. July 26
• Mississauga News story "Mississauga company proposing to build Toronto wind farm"
looks into a little-known renewable energy company that claims to be working on a wind
project at Tommy Thompson Park. July 30
• Toronto Star story "Leslie Spit plan seen as ill wind" discusses wind turbines on the Leslie
Street Spit. July 30
• Brampton Guardian story "New aerial obstacle course will leave you dangling" showcases
the new outdoor adventure Treetop Trekking experience in Heart Lake Conservation Area.
July 31
• CBC.CA News online story "Homeowners could foot bill for repairs to Mimico Creek" reports
on how some of the homeowners who live along Mimico Creek in Etobicoke could be
facing a hefty repair bill due to the July 8 storm. July 31
August
• Toronto Star story "From sewage dump to natural treasure" is a four part series where the
Toronto Star looks at the rivers of Toronto. Insight was provided by TRCA for this series.
August 5
• Bloor West Villager story "Grenadier Pond cleared of dead fish" talks about dead fish found
at the pond and what improvements if any are called for in terms of a health hazard. The
story mentions that the City of Toronto is keeping TRCA in the loop on the situation. August
9
• Toronto Star story "Bird watchers, dog owners clash over use of Sam Smith Park" is about
how some canines are allowed to run free outside designated off-leash area. The story
mentions how it would be ideal to have a no dogs policy similar to what is in place at
Tommy Thompson Park. August 13
• Scarborough Mirror story "Scarborough Bridging Festival opens with music event"
publicizes the annual Bridging Festival in southeast Scarborough which the Highland Creek
Green Team is involved in. August 15
437
• Thestar.com story "Why Toronto residents must embrace city wildlife" discusses how wildlife
population is on the rise in urban centres and discusses the reasons why with TRCA
experts. August 20
• Beach Mirror in story "Fifth Annual Butterfly Fest at Tommy Thompson Park" the writer
reports on the Butterfly Festival and activities being planned. August 21
• Canadian Beer News story "Black Creek Lemon Balm Mint Ale to be released this weekend"
reports on the latest of the specialty brews available at the historic brewery. August 22
• Financial Post story "Urban renewal: Passion or profit?" discusses how urban renewal plays
a significant role in the market. It highlights Evergreen at the Brick Works as an example.
August 26
• Oshawa This Week story "Emerald ash borer sets up shop in Durham" describes the
emerald ash borer and the report by TRCA regarding its eradication. August 30
• Toronto Star story "Fish biting in Toronto harbour? That's the conservationists' plan"
describes how walleye's return in spawning season is seen as proof that the waterfront is a
healthy habitat. The articles also describes TRCA projects in fish habitat restoration. August
30
September
• Toronto Star story "As summer winds down, beauty abounds" describes how the search for
the elusive monarch butterfly leads to other enchanting discoveries. It describes the writer's
visit to Tommy Thompson Park. September 1
• Stouffville Sun-Tribune story "Zip-lining, BMX biking on tap at Stouffville Rd. park" mentions
a zip-line through the tree tops at Bruce's Mill is in the development stage. September 9
• Scarborough Mirror story "Young tree care workshop hosted by LEAF at Scarborough Civic
Centre" describes how caring for young trees is the subject of a free workshop and will be
attended by TRCA. September 9
• Caledon Enterprise story "Students excited to reside at unique Albion Hills school"
describes how 50 years ago, a unique school called Albion Hills Conservation School, was
built through funds provided solely by TRCA. September 11
• Scarborough Mirror story "Pan Am Path proposal draws positive response" reports on how
the City of Toronto says it is discussing trail options with Toronto Water and TRCA.
September 12
• thestar.com story "Wild in the City: Fall allergies? Don't blame goldenrod" reports on how
across our region, along every highway, byway, disturbed spot and waste space, fields of
golden rod are mistaken for ragweed. The writer mentions Tommy Thompson Park .
September 15
• thestar.com story "Bio Blitz crowd counts all creatures great and small" discusses this year's
Bio Blitz, now the world's biggest effort at cataloguing and catching animal, insect and
fungal species, held at the Toronto Zoo. The list of partners for this initiative has now grown
to include the Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto Zoo, Parks Canada, Ontario Nature, TRCA,
Environment Canada and a number of universities. September 15
• Mississauga News story "Authorities warn people of high water levels" whereby
Environment Canada forecasted a period of extended rainfall over the weekend and TRCA
warned about high water levels. September 20
• Scarborough Mirror story "Highland Creek salmon walk set for Sunday" describes how
Highland Creek in Scarborough runs each fall with spawning salmon and a free event by
TRCA and the Highland Creek Green Team is set for the weekend. September 20
438
• North York Mirror story "Spirited Affair at Black Creek Pioneer Village" describes the
fundraiser and how you can step back in time to two fun-filled decades.
Report prepared by: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632
Email: rcalpito @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Rowena Calpito, extension 5632
Emails: rcalpito @trca.on.ca
Date: October 11, 2013
RES.#A181/13 - WATERSHED COMMITTEE MINUTES
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Linda Pabst
THAT Section IV Item AUTH8.3 -Watershed Committee Minutes, be received.
CARRIED
Section IV- Item EX8.3
DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL
Minutes of Meeting #11/12, held on December 13, 2012
Minutes of Meeting #1/13, held on April 18, 2013
Minutes of Meeting #2/13, held on May 30, 2013
Minutes of Meeting #3/13, held on June 20, 2013
ETOBICOKE-MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION
Minutes of Meeting #1/13, held on April 25, 2013
ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
RES.#A182/13 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Bob Callahan
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06 items EX10.1 - EX10.71, contained in Executive
Committee Minutes #8/13, held on October 4, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
439
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:49 a.m., on Friday, October 25, 2013.
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/ks
440
Toronto and Region
Conservation
Authority
MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY#9/13
November 22, 2013
The Authority Meeting #9/13, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village,
on Friday, November 22, 2013. The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to
order at 9:42 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Vice Chair
Ben Cachola Member
Bob Callahan Member
Ronald Chopowick Member
Vincent Crisanti Member
Glenn De Baeremaeker Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Jack Heath Member
Colleen Jordan Member
Mujeeb Khan Member
Glenn Mason Member
Mike Mattos Member
Peter Milczyn Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair
Anthony Perruzza Member
Deb Schulte Member
John Sprovieri Member
Cynthia Thorburn Member
Jim Tovey Member
Richard Whitehead Member
ABSENT
Paul Ainslie Member
David Barrow Member
Raymond Cho Member
Chris Fonseca Member
Gloria Lindsay Luby Member
Linda Pabst Member
John Parker Member
Dave Ryan Member
441
RES.#A183/13 - MINUTES
Moved by: Jim Tovey
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #8/13, held on October 25, 2013, be approved.
CARRIED
PRESENTATIONS
(a) A presentation by Ken Dion, Senior Project Manager, Watershed Management, TRCA,
and Janice Hatton, Program Support Analyst, Water Division, Peel Region, in regard to
item AUTH7.1 - Lakeview Waterfront Connection Environmental Assessment.
(b) A presentation by Adam Szaflarski, Project Manager, Planning, Inventory and Audit (A),
Conservation Lands, TRCA, in regard to item AUTH7.2 - East Duffins Headwaters
Management Plan Update.
(c) A presentation by Kathy Stranks, Manager, Corporate Secretariat, in regard to item
EX7.6 - Use of Resources During an Election..
RES.#A184/13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: Jim Tovey
Seconded by: Deb Schulte
THAT above-noted presentation (a) be received.
CARRIED
RES.#A185/13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Glenn Mason
THAT above-noted presentation (b) be received.
CARRIED
RES.#A186/13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Maria Augimeri
THAT above-noted presentation (c) be received.
CARRIED
442
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#A187/13 - LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT CONNECTION ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT
Support of the Lakeview Waterfront Connection Environmental
Assessment Preferred Alternative and direction to proceed to detailed
design in support of Credit Valley Conservation and Region of Peel.
Moved by: Jim Tovey
Seconded by: Deb Schulte
WHEREAS at Authority Meeting #11/11, held on January 27, 2012, Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff was directed to enter into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) to provide project management and technical services for the
coordinated Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Lakeview Waterfront Connection
(LWC) Project on behalf of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Region of Peel;
AND WHEREAS CVC and the Region of Peel received approval to proceed with the
completion of the LWC EA and associated implementation on October 18, 2013 and
October 24, 2013 (Res.#PW-B1);
AND WHEREAS the Region of Peel and CVC will remain as co-proponents on the project,
with Region of Peel continuing to provide oversight of the Project, and CVC leading
communication efforts, managing landscaping and ensuring compliance monitoring
meets the EA requirements;
AND WHEREAS TRCA has been requested to continue to provide project management
and technical services on behalf of Region of Peel and CVC in support of the Lakeview
Waterfront Connection Project as part of the detailed design works;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA staff be directed to enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding with Region of Peel and/or Credit Valley Conservation to
provide project management, detailed design, technical and construction management
services in support of the implementation of the LWC Project, the scope of work and work
schedule which shall be developed and agreed upon by the three agencies, on a fee for
service basis, subject to all terms and conditions being finalized in a manner satisfactory
to TRCA staff and solicitors;
THAT authorization be granted to access the project site from Lakeshore Road East
through TRCA-owned property at the Arsenal Lands, City of Mississauga (1352 and 1400
Lakeshore Road East), if required;
THAT approval be granted to stockpile up to 200,000 m3 of construction rubble, if
required, and subject to terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA staff and solicitor as
necessary, on TRCA-owned property at the Arsenal Lands (1400 Lakeshore Road East) in
the City of Mississauga, during 2014 and 2015 while EA approvals, detailed design, and
permit and waterlot acquisition activities are underway;
443
THAT the contract for detailed design of the shoreline works in support of the LWC
Project, which will include physical and numerical modelling of shoreline designs, be
awarded to Shoreplan Engineering Ltd. on a preferred source basis at a total cost not to
exceed $375,000.00, plus 20% contingency, plus HST;
THAT the community liaison committee (CLC), established as part of the LWC EA process
be thanked for their involvement in support of the LWC EA and requested to continue to
be involved through the detailed design phase, with the expressed purpose of assisting in
obtaining public input, reviewing information, providing comments to CVC/TRCA to be
utilized during the design process, and assisting with the dissemination of LWC
information to the community;
THAT TRCA staff be directed to take the necessary action to implement any agreements,
including obtaining any necessary approvals for the stockpile, and the signing and
execution of all documents;
THAT staff continue to work cooperatively with City of Mississauga staff to support, and
move forward with, the Arsenal Lands Master Planning and Implementation process
during, and following, the LWC EA process, and the subsequent implementation of the
LWC EA;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff report back annually during the implementation of the
LWC Project.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Lakeview Waterfront Connection Project seeks to improve a highly degraded area of the
eastern Mississauga waterfront by creating new aquatic and terrestrial habitats and linkages,
while providing access and recreation opportunities for the public. The proponents propose to
use an innovative funding approach that seeks to maximize public benefit by re-using locally
generated fill from the Region of Peel's, and potentially the City of Mississauga's, existing
10-year capital works projects and budgets to create this new natural park.
The Terms of Reference (ToR) for the LWC EA were approved by the Ministry of the
Environment (MOE) with no conditions on December 5, 2012, with the Notice a
Commencement for the LWC EA issued on January 2, 2013. The goal of the LWC Project is to
create a new natural park that will establish ecological habitat and public linkages on the
eastern Mississauga waterfront. Five objectives were established to measure the ability of the
various project alternatives to meet this goal:
• Naturalization: Establish a diverse range of native terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem
habitats and linkages in a degraded area of the eastern Mississauga waterfront.
• Access: Create safe and accessible public linkages for access to and along the
waterfront, while allowing for compatible recreational, educational, and cultural heritage
opportunities.
• Compatibility: Ensure that the LWC is compatible with existing infrastructure.
• Coordination: Coordinate with and inform other local planning and development efforts.
• Fiscal Viability: Use and innovative funding approach that seeks to maximize public
benefit and value by reusing locally generated fill from Regional and City capital works
projects to create this new natural park.
444
Consultation
In support of the development of the LWC EA, broad stakeholder consultation activities were
undertaken, including the establishment of a Community Liaison Committee, composed of
representatives from diverse community organizations and associations. The CLC assisted in
obtaining public input, reviewing information, identifying concerns and providing feedback to
the Project Team. A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was also established to maintain an
open line of communication throughout the EA process with various municipal, provincial and
federal agencies. Additional public input was sought through Public Information Centres (PICs),
and various outreach initiatives, including direct mail outs to interested individuals and
organizations, local businesses, and First Nations and Metis.
Five separate alternatives were presented at PIC#1 (January 2013) and evaluated based on
how well each alternative met the project objectives. A Preferred Alternative was identified and
presented at PIC#2 (April 2013). In response to public feedback received at PIC#2,
refinements to the Preferred Alternative were undertaken to address concerns regarding the
amount of overlap of the LWC Project with the existing sand beach at Marie Curtis Park West.
Extensive consultation showing the refined Preferred Alternative were conducted throughout
the summer of 2013 at Marie Curtis Park, Lakefront Promenade Park, at a number of
community hosted events and at a public open house on September 17, 2013 hosted by
Councillors Tovey and Grimes. The refined Preferred Alternative and outcomes of the Draft EA
will be presented at PIC#3 in November 2013.
Refined Preferred Alternative
3
The refined Preferred Alternative proposes to use approximately 1.5 to 2 million m of clean fill
to create a new land base extending southeast into Lake Ontario. In the east, the feature will
connect to the western-most extent of Marie Curtis Park and transition from a gravel/sand
beach to a cobble beach. Three rocky islands are proposed to help absorb wave energy,
allowing for calmer waters along the new beach proposed for the feature, and for the creation
of aquatic habitat. Views to both the City of Mississauga and City of Toronto shorelines are
proposed as part of the design, as well as a network of multi-use trails. The Preferred
Alternative was best able to meet the project objectives:
• Naturalization: The proposed feature "establishes a range of terrestrial and aquatic
ecosystem habitats and ecological linkages" and enhances the quality and function of
the shoreline area for both residents and migratory species. Based on the use of
3
approximately 1.5 to 2 million m of clean fill, the LWC will result in the creation of
approximately 26 to 33 hectares of greenspace consisting of natural meadow, new
beach, coastal, treed swamp and seasonal island habitat.
• Access: The LWC will provide "... accessible public linkages..." by creating a land base
that establishes a new local linkage between Marie Curtis Park to the east and Lakefront
Promenade (once Inspiration Lakeview is in place) to the west. Access to this area is
currently restricted due to safety concerns along the Ontario Power Generation lands
and Region of Peel's GE Booth Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF).
• Compatibility: The LWC has been developed in a manner such that both function and
access to both the GE Booth WWTF and the Lakeview Treatment Plant have been
maintained, thereby ensuring that it is "compatible with existing infrastructure."
445
• Coordination: The LWC "coordinates and informs other local planning and
development efforts" and contributes directly to conservation and restoration efforts and
public accessibility and recreational priorities from the local to regional levels.
• Fiscal Viability: The LWC presents a unique opportunity to reuse "locally generated fill
from Regional and City capital works projects..." in a manner that enables cost savings
to the Region of Peel to be reallocated to the creation of the LWC. This local solution will
translate to reduced impacts to surrounding rural communities and farmlands and
reduced use of already limited regional landfill capacities, while minimizing truck travel
times and associated greenhouse gas emissions.
At present, there is no vehicular access to the construction area from Lakeshore Road which
necessitates the construction of a new, temporary access route. As part of the EA process, an
evaluation of alternative site access routes was undertaken to identify a preferred access route
from Lakeshore Road East to the western end of Marie Curtis Park West beach. While access
through the GE Booth WWTF was initially considered, the proposed routes through the WWTF
were deemed to pose an impact on plant operations and security concerns. As such, five
alternative site access routes to the east of the WWTF were developed based on historic and
existing access points along Lakeshore Road East. The evaluation considered a number of
constraints within the Arsenal Lands (i.e. the waterfront trail, heritage resources, soil
contamination, natural features, park amenities in Marie Curtis Park, and traffic along Lakeshore
Road East).
While access through the Ontario Power Generation's (OPGs) former Lakeview generating site
would greatly reduce the impacts to the local community and public park use, the decision
regarding the future of this site will not be made until June 2014. During the detailed design
phase, the Project Team will continue to explore opportunities with OPG and the City of
Mississauga to permit project access through the OPG property, should the opportunity arise.
In advance of the June 2014 decision, the LWC EA identifies a Preferred Access Route through
TRCA-owned property at the Arsenal Lands (1352 Lakeshore Road East), and down along a
portion of the Waterfront Trail (through Region of Peel property), before entering the
construction site on the western end of Marie Curtis Park West beach (Figure 2). Two entrances
for the Preferred Access Route are proposed, at the existing signalized entrance south of the
Dixie Road intersection, and at the existing non-signalized entrance just east of the entrance to
the Arsenal Lands building. Due to the tunnel shaft for the Hanlan Feeder Main Project, the
entrance at Dixie Road will not be available for approximately the first year of construction for
the LWC Project. In the interim, the entrance to the east is proposed for use. Once the Hanlan
Feeder Main Project vacates the site, the LWC Project should be able to utilize the entrance at
Dixie Road.
To minimize impacts on the natural heritage, the Preferred Access Route utilizes a portion of the
existing Waterfront Trail before entering the construction site at the western end of Marie Curtis
Park West beach. As the Waterfront Trail will require closure during construction, the LWC EA
proposes a realignment of the Waterfront Trail to the south side of Lakeshore Road East,
connecting the existing Waterfront Trail link along Lakeshore Road at the entrance of Marie
Curtis Park West. The LWC EA also proposes to re-open the existing Waterfront Trail to the
public during non-construction periods (i.e. weekends and evenings) if possible.
446
Upon completion of the LWC Project, the site will be vacated and restored to an agreed upon
condition, or agreed to rough grading condition that will conform with the Arsenal Lands Master
Plan. TRCA staff will continue to work cooperatively with City of Mississauga staff to support,
and move forward with, the Arsenal Lands Master Planning and Implementation process
during, and following, the LWC EA process, and the subsequent implementation of the LWC
Project.
Temporary Stockpile of Construction Rubble
At Authority Meeting #3/12, held on April 27, 2012, Resolution #A43/12 was approved, in part,
as follows:
THAT approval be granted to stockpile clean fill generated by the Regional Municipality
of Peel, and possibly the City of Mississauga, on Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA)-owned property at the Arsenal Lands, City of Mississauga, in advance
of the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Lakeview Waterfront Connection (LWC)
Project;
THAT approval to stockpile clean fill be subject to terms and conditions satisfactory to
TRCA staff and solicitor as necessary;...
This initial proposal sought to temporarily stockpile up to 500,000 m 3 of excavated clean fill
generated from the Region of Peel's various infrastructure projects and, potentially other
projects, for use in the construction of the LWC Project. The purpose of the stockpile was to
maximize the cost efficiency of the project, and contribute to a reduction in CO2 emissions due
to a significant reduction in total kilometres travelled by trucks hauling fill. The implementation
of the Arsenal Lands Master Plan, scheduled to commence in 2013, was deferred to
accommodate the temporary stockpile of fill related to the LWC EA and $2 million in special
funding was requested from the Region of Peel for rehabilitation of the Small Arms Building as
compensation for the delay in the Master Plan implementation. The temporary stockpile of
clean fill at the Arsenal Lands did not proceed as anticipated due to a land use zoning change
challenge.
In advance of LWC EA approvals, and while detailed design, permitting and waterlot acquisition
activities are underway, the Region of Peel and TRCA are proposing to explore temporarily
stockpiling up to 200,000 m 3 of construction rubble near the G.E. Booth Waste Water Treatment
Facility and/or at the Arsenal Lands. If a stockpile is selected for the Arsenal Lands, the historic
water tower and local wetlands will not be impacted, and there are no concerns regarding
sedimentation or dust from the stockpile of construction rubble. Access to the site will be
controlled via an existing eight foot high chain link fence.
The stockpile would be in place between 2014 and 2015, and is an important component to
meeting the construction timelines of the LWC Project, once EA approvals are received. The
construction rubble would be used to build the construction access road as well as the outer
containment berm of the land creation area.
447
Upon placement of all the stockpiled construction rubble, all debris will be removed by TRCA
from the site and any disturbed and/or damaged areas will be restored to the original state, or
to an agreed to rough grading condition that will conform with the Arsenal Lands Master Plan,
should the process recommence.
In the event that the stockpiled material cannot be relocated for use in the LWC Project by
2016, the Region of Peel will remove all stockpiled material to a suitable off-site location, and
assume all costs associated with the relocation.
Detailed Desian of Shoreline Works
In support of the LWC EA, acting as the coastal engineer as part of the SENES Consultant
Team, Shoreplan Engineering Ltd. undertook the development and evaluation of Alternative
shoreline configurations in support of the identification of a Preferred Alternative, refinement of
coastal models for the Preferred Alternative to ensure stability of the shoreline, detailed
assessment of the Preferred Alternative, and development of a preliminary implementation plan
and capital cost for each Project component.
The LWC Project Team is proposing to retain Shoreplan Engineering on a preferred source
retainer, to an upset limit of$375,000, plus contingency and HST, to continue with shoreline
design works, including numerical and physical modelling, in support of the detailed design
phase of the LWC Project.
As the coastal design engineer through the LWC EA process, Shoreplan Engineering Ltd. is
most familiar with the LWC Project, site conditions and design details. Recognizing the project
timelines, with construction works anticipated to commence in 2015, retaining Shoreplan
Engineering Ltd. will assist us in meeting the LWC Project timelines and avoid significant
project delays.
Staff therefore recommends awarding the contract for detailed design of the shoreline works in
support of the LWC Project, which will include physical and numerical modelling of shoreline
designs, to Shoreplan Engineering on a preferred source basis as per Section 9.3.3 as follows:
The required goods and services are to be supplied by a vendor or supplier having
specialized knowledge, skills, expertise or experience that cannot be reasonably
provided by any other supplier.
LWC Proiect Timelines
It is anticipated that the draft EA submission will occur in late 2013, with the final EA submission
to MOE in early 2014. Approvals may be received by fall 2014, with detailed design
commencing shortly thereafter.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for the implementation of the LWC Project will be provided to TRCA by the Region of
Peel, as special project funding on a fee for service basis to cover TRCA staff time and related
expenses. The Project Team will report back to Region of Peel Council at the conclusion of the
Detailed Design stage in fall 2014 to confirm overall project costs for the LWC Project.
Funds will flow through an expanded series of 252 accounts to track TRCA staff and consultant
costs for the design component of the project.
448
Following construction, CVC will assume ownership and oversee operations and maintenance
of the completed LWC feature. There are no anticipated additional financial impacts to TRCA
associated with the LWC Project.
Report prepared by: Ken Dion, extension 5230
Emails: kdion @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Ken Dion, extension 5230
Emails: kdion @trca.on.ca
Date: October 25, 2013
RES.#A188/13 - EAST DUFFINS HEADWATERS MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE
Final Approval. Report back and presentation to the Authority confirming
municipal endorsements of the East Duffins Headwaters Management
Plan Update.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Glenn Mason
THAT the Authority be advised that endorsement of the East Duffins Headwaters
Management Plan was received from the Township of Uxbridge, City of Pickering and
Region of Durham;
AND FURTHER THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff work
collaboratively with the Township of Uxbridge, City of Pickering, Region of Durham and
the Glen Major and Walker Woods Stewardship Committee to implement the plan.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #2/13, held on March 22, 2013 Resolution #A35/13 was approved as
follows:
THAT the draft East Duffins Headwaters Management Plan Update, dated March 2013 be
approved in principle;
THAT the draft Plan be circulated to the Township of Uxbridge, the City of Pickering and
the Region of Durham requesting endorsement of the Plan;
THAT following circulation, staff report back to the Authority to confirm endorsement of
the final Plan;
AND FURTHER THAT staff proceed to implement the Management Plan Update priority
projects in partnership with project stakeholders
Subsequently, staff made a presentation to Uxbridge Council on June 24, 2013, and Uxbridge
Council passed the following motion:
449
THAT the Council of the Township of Uxbridge endorse the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority's East Duffins Headwaters Management Plan.
On October 9, 2013, the Planning and Economic Development Committee of Durham Regional
Council moved and carried the following motion endorsing the Plan:
That the East Duffins Headwaters Management Plan Update be endorsed in principle
Finally, the East Duffins Headwaters Management Plan Update was endorsed by the City of
Pickering Executive Council on November 11, 2013, where the following motion was carried:
THAT the East Duffins Headwaters Management Plan be endorsed by council
The Management Plan Update applies to the East Duffins Headwaters (EDH), a group of
properties totalling over 1,400 ha in size in the South Uxbridge Area. These lands sit between
Brock Road and Lakeridge Road along the Uxbridge-Pickering Townline. Over 1,100 ha of the
study area is made up of largely intact forest, and as a whole the properties represent some of
the most unspoiled lands in the Greater Toronto Area. All of the properties in the EDH are
located within the Oak Ridges Moraine and make up valuable parts of the headwaters of not
only the Duffins Creek watershed but also the Lynde Creek, Pefferlaw River and Lake Scugog
watersheds. Further underscoring the environmental significance of the property, the EDH
intersects with major sections of both the Uxbridge Kames Environmentally Sensitive Area and
the provincially designated Uxbridge Glen Major Forest Area of Natural and Scientific Interest.
The area is also home to several regional species of concern and Ontario Species at Risk.
The Management Plan addresses a wide variety of property management issues including site
securement, public safety and restoration opportunities, while providing opportunities for
passive nature-based recreation on the properties. Key project components include an updated
series of management zones, management recommendations, a site securement and
protection plan, a property-wide trail plan and a corresponding 15 year implementation plan
and budget.
While the East Duffins Headwaters Management Update was completed prior to the completion
of TRCA's Building The Living City: 10-Year Strategic Plan 2013-2022 , the Management Plan
does align with many of the priorities outlined in the Strategic Plan, including the following
objectives and actions:
• create a network of greenspace and green infrastructure that weaves through every
community to connect a healthy and resilient landscape;
• more people engaging with nature more often;
• improved protection of Toronto region's natural systems;
• work with our partners to identify and protect the significant spaces in our region that are
sensitive and ecologically important that will benefit from careful control of community use;
• more community members contributing to watershed, community and sustainability
planning;
• maximum impact from use of funds and resources through efficiencies and partnerships;
and
450
• work with our municipal, provincial and federal partners to assign the management of public
lands in order to make more efficient and effective use of our combined resources.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
TRCA staff have begun the implementation of the East Duffins Headwaters Management Plan
and will continue to act on the priority management recommendations within the plan. The key
projects include:
• The implementation of the property trail plan, including providing trail connections between
the TRCA Skyloft and TRCA Dagmar properties;
• an updated property trail guide and an update to the property signage;
• opening of the TRCA Wilder Forest and Wildlife Reserve for public use;
• securing the Historic James Woods Walker Mill, and potentially converting the Mill into an
interpretive feature;
• providing an accessible trail experience on the TRCA Pleasure Valley property.
Staff will continue to work with the Glen Major Forest and Walker Woods Stewardship
committee, Township of Uxbridge, City of Pickering and Region of Durham to ensure that
TRCA's partners and neighbours in the East Duffins subwatershed remain fully engaged in
stewarding the East Duffins Headwaters properties.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for the implementation of the East Duffins Headwaters Management Plan Update has
been budgeted in the existing Durham Watershed Trails Account 109-06, Property
Management Account 005-10 funded by and Conservation Area Management Plan Account
408-45. Funding is available in TRCA's budget Durham Region, The Living City Foundation
and levy from TRCA's municipal funding partners.
Report prepared by: Adam Szaflarski, extension 5596
Emails: aszaflarski @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Adam Szaflarski, extension 5596, Mike Bender, extension 5287
Emails: aszaflarski @trca.on.ca, mbender @trca.on.ca
Date: November 22, 2013
Attachments: 1
451
Attachment 1
, \ \
' \-___--- ,
vse,, .,..----------
L\ \
' ,e
',
North Walker
Woods ',
„ .
, ,0
\ \
Skyloft
42 Nntalker Wooga
, , 1J
\ Pleasure Vakey , 0.-----
_ Foet-
'r- 0-0,----
Wider Forest ni0' ,. )
Wildlife Area L : ----- i
1 Dagmar
- ' - \
t %
' \ , \
,,
, , \
\ ,
s .
,9 ----
\ - -----
„--- --
.. ,
—-
, \
kkl98:----
, r- \ .,0
.„--
i„--- ,
-----
N ' \
i , \ ,, ,,
as) --',---'--
RAO \ °tr.\'.._-------
9V,--C-'--------
---'
__,-- \, ----
.------
N
) \
J r
T.IttlIt4;ono fit-yiurt 1101.°711.14
Legend ConserVation , ,----- ---- ' - ' '
tiv The Living Cit v- r---7----
_ _ ,
.---'
Municipal Boundaries .,0 / , N L0 ....'
:
TR CA Property _• ,:., _.
, .• - . ,. -TORONTO
-
Parcel Assessment 0 225450 900 1,350 1,800
...Maters '. ' '- -
Key Map
''Queen's Punter for°MOM)and its licensors.[20051 May Not he Reproduced without Permission THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY
452
RES.#A189/13 - CLAREMONT FIELD CENTRE PHASE 1 RETROFIT PROJECT
Tender PMO13-12. Award of Contract PMO13-12 for accessibility
upgrades to the front entrance and washroom facilities at the Claremont
Field Centre (4290 Westney Road), City of Pickering, Regional
Municipality of Durham.
Moved by: Bob Callahan
Seconded by: Deb Schulte
THAT contract PMO13-12 for accessibility upgrades to the front entrance and washroom
facilities at the Claremont Field Centre be awarded to Brown Daniels Associates at a total
cost not to exceed $462,321.00, plus HST, plus 20% contingency, subject to receipt of all
necessary approvals, permits and funding, it being the lowest bid meeting Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;
THAT award of tender be subject to terms and conditions satisfactory to TRCA staff and
legal advisors (if necessary);
THAT should staff be unable to negotiate a mutually acceptable tender agreement with
the above-mentioned contractor, staff be authorized to enter into contract negotiations
with other contractors, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting TRCA
specifications;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such action as is
necessary to implement the contract, including the signing and execution of documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Claremont Field Centre is located at 4290 Westney Road in the Regional Municipality of
Durham, just north of the City of Pickering. Opened in 1970, the field centre is a building made
entirely of manufactured cedar logs (panabode) with a lounge, wood burning fireplace, dining
area, classroom/lab space and provides overnight accommodation for up to 66 visitors. The
overnight dormitory style lodgings also provide dedicated rooms with ensuite washrooms for
visiting teaching staff or leaders. Offering a wide range of programs for elementary and
secondary school groups, Guide and Scout groups, as well as youth and adult groups, the field
centre's clientele has continually grown. To continue to meet the expectations of these repeat
users, and to attract new users, certain building upgrades and renovations are required to
improve the overall educational experience of the field centre.
As part of the Community Infrastructure Improvement Fund (CIFF), TRCA engaged LGA
Architectural Partners to undertake a facility assessment which included energy efficiency and
accessibility of the Claremont Field Centre. The purpose of the assessment and design was to
provide a framework for major renovations and operational system retrofits that meets both the
Ontario Building Code, and the revised Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA)
requirements, and the needs of its users.
453
With limited funding for this years improvements, priority items were selected based on a
combination of rectifying building deficiencies and removing accessibility barriers, thus
improving the building and increasing its user base. The scope of work for Phase 1 consists of
upgrades to the aged dormitory washroom facilities, with barrier free washrooms and showers,
and the expansion of the front entrance of the building to facilitate the larger user groups and
allow for wheelchair access.
In order to minimize disruption to student use throughout the school year, renovation and
construction activities at the Claremont Field Centre are limited to mid-December through
mid-January for upgrades to the washroom facilities and mid-December through late March
2014 for front exterior renovations. As such, the complete retrofit of the field centre will be
phased over a number of years and will also include upgrades to the existing heating,
ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system, lighting plan, kitchen facilities, and building
insulation.
This major facility upgrade and retrofit will significantly contribute to the accessibility and
programming for the field centre and strengthen its position as an important environmental and
sustainability education resource.
RATIONALE
Request for Pre-Qualification (RFPQ) for general contractors was advertised on-line with
biddingo.com on October 15, 2013 and closed on October 21, 2013. The work includes, but is
not necessarily limited to, the supply of labour, material, supervision and equipment to perform
the prescribed scope of work. The general contractor will coordinate all construction activities
to facilitate the proposed upgrades.
General contractors interested in pre-qualifying were advised of the criteria for evaluation
including:
• completeness of submission;
• past experience with building retrofit and/or construction projects of a similar program;
• past experience with the proposed scope of work;
• ability to meet construction milestones;
• ability to coordinate work by others; and
• experience dealing with projects with construction budgets of$500,000 to $1 million.
Bidders were required to submit a bid bond of 10% of the contract price at the time of the
tender submission, as well as an Agreement to Bond from a surety company for Performance
and Labour and Material.
The pre-qualifying documents were reviewed by the selection committee made up of TRCA
staff that have extensive backgrounds in new building and retrofit construction projects. The
proposals were evaluated using the following criteria being met in order to receive a tender
package:
• CCDC11 (Canadian Construction Documents Committee) Contractor's Qualification
Statement;
• company experience and background in similar works;
• experience of suggested personnel for this project;
• project record over the past five years; and
• references focusing on firms history of project control and experience.
454
Based on the evaluation process, tender documents were made available to the following
seven general contractors on October 24, 2013:
• Ameresco Canada Inc.;
• Berkim Construction Inc.;
• Brown Daniels Associates;
• HN Construction Ltd.;
• Morosons Construction Ltd.;
• Struct-Con Construction Ltd.; and
• Vema Corporation.
All of the pre-qualified bidders attended a mandatory site meeting on October 29, 2013.
Tenders closed on November 8, 2013 and were opened by the Tender Opening Committee on
November 11, 2013 with the following results:
BIDDERS TOTAL
(Plus HST)
Brown Daniels Associates $452,321.00
HN Construction Ltd. $473,000.00
Struct-Con Construction $524,000.00
Berkim Construction Inc. $565,575.00
Morosons Construction Ltd. $705,000.00
Ameresco Canada Inc. No Bid
Vema Corporation No Bid
Having pre-qualified the bidders qualifications, TRCA staff evaluated the tenders on bid prices
and the ability to complete the project within the specified construction window. Based on the
evaluation criteria and recommendations from LGA Architectural Partners, staff concluded that
the tender submitted by Brown Daniels Associates meets all requirements set out in the tender
documents and is the lowest bid received. Therefore, staff recommends that Contract
PMO13-12 be awarded to Brown Daniels Associates for the total cost not to exceed
$462,321.00, plus 20% contingency, plus HST, as they are the lowest bidder that meets TRCA
specifications.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
33% of the funding for this project is available through a grant from the FedDev Ontario
Community Infrastructure Improvement Fund, and the remainder is available in the TRCA 2013
budget from TRCA's municipal partners in the Claremont Field Centre Major Maintenance
Account (353-15) and TRCA Public Use Capital (408-98).
Report prepared by: Lisa Moore, 416-704-2476
Emails: Imoore @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Lisa Moore, 416-704-2476 or Aaron D'Souza extension 5775
Emails: Imoore @trca.on.ca or ajdsouza @trca.on.ca
Date: November 01, 2013
455
RES.#A190/13 - BOARD MATERIAL DISTRIBUTION
Recommendation for moving to electronic distribution of meeting material
for Members of the board.
Moved by: Jack Heath
Seconded by: Peter Milczyn
THAT agendas and minutes for Authority, Executive Committee, Budget/Audit Advisory
Board meetings and any other committees of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
(TRCA) that may be developed, be provided to Members by electronic means rather than
in paper format.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
TRCA has had a Corporate Social Responsibility Program since 1999 which is intended to
manage TRCA's organizational commitment to sustainability. The Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) Program encompasses four key areas of sustainability:
1. Our People
The impact TRCA has on its employees:
• equity, diversity, and staff retention;
• employee engagement.
2. Our Environment
The environmental impact of our operations:
• carbon footprint;
• energy use;
• water use
• vehicles, fuel and travel;
• land management;
• waste management.
3. Our Business
The overall impact of our business practices:
• sustainable Business Practice;
• Green Purchasing.
4. Our Community
The impact TRCA's social programs have on the community.
RATIONALE
In keeping with this program, TRCA staff is recommending that agenda and minutes
distribution move to an electronic format rather than paper. Timing is right to move to this
method with the advent of tablets and board meeting software designed for ease of document
sorting on tablets. Currently nine Members of the Authority receive material electronically only
which has acted as a test case for suitability of this method and due to the success of this staff
believes moving entirely to electronic distribution to be a viable option.
456
The annual paper usage for the 19 Members of the Authority who still receive paper copies is
approximately 28,000 pieces of paper. It has recently been confirmed that printing for TRCA
staff will discontinue and they will either use electronic methods or print only the items that
pertain to them, resulting in a reduction of an additional 25,000 pieces of paper. This is
considered to be a significant move toward meeting TRCA's Corporate Social Responsibility
targets.
Savings will also be seen in staff time (approximately 40 hours annually for copier production
and courier for material for Members only); elimination of courier charges; and discontinuation
of lease of a production photocopier.
Staff is proposing to provide a tablet to Members of the Authority who do not currently have
one, that would be returned to TRCA at the end of their term, or provide an allowance for
purchase of a tablet. Staff is also exploring board meeting management software for tablets to
see if this will provide easier document management for Members at the meetings.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Print production for Members, including paper costs and courier costs annually is
approximately $2,500. Since staff no longer require hard copies, if the Members went to
electronic distribution as well, there would be additional annual savings of approximately
$4,600 due to the elimination of a lease for a production copier and printing/toner costs, as well
as 40 hours of staff time will be saved.
The cost for tablets is approximately$400 per unit, and cost of a board meeting management
software is being explored at this time. There may also be TRCA IT staff costs with tablet set up
and usage, depending on whether they are purchased or an allowance is provided. Overall,
cost to TRCA would be generally the same, but TRCA would be closer to meeting its Corporate
Social Responsibility targets, and is also in keeping with TRCA's 10 year strategic Plan -
Building The Living City.
Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
Date: November 12, 2013
RES.#A191/13 - TRIDEL CORPORATION
Request for a Permanent Easement for a Sanitary Sewer Upgrade to
Service Developments at 1 Old Mill Drive in the City of Toronto, Humber
River Watershed, CFN 49837. Receipt of a request from Tridel
Corporation to provide a permanent easement for an upgraded sanitary
sewer to service developments at 1 Old Mill Drive in the City of Toronto,
Humber River watershed.
(Executive Res.#8131/13)
457
Moved by: Mike Mattos
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request
from Tridel Corporation (Tridel) for a permanent sanitary sewer easement to service
Tridel's developments at 1 Old Mill Drive, City of Toronto, Humber River watershed;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interests of TRCA in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to
cooperate with Tridel and the City of Toronto in this instance;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing 0.058
hectares (0.143 acres), more or less, be granted to the City of Toronto for an upgraded
sanitary sewer to facilitate the development of adjacent lands owned by Tridel at 1 Old
Mill Drive in the City of Toronto, said land being Part of Lots 1 and 2 Humber Range,
Concession 2 from the Bay and designated as Part 1 and 2 on draft plan by I.M.
Pastushak Limited OLS, job number#13-15-027-00, subject to the following terms and
conditions:
a) the easement price be $420,000 per acre (ie $60,000), to be paid by Tridel, and in
addition Tridel shall pay all legal and survey costs incurred by TRCA to complete this
transaction;
b) sediment control measures in a manner satisfactory to TRCA be practiced by Tridel
during any construction;
c) an archaeological investigation be conducted by TRCA staff prior to any site
disturbance, with any mitigative measures required being carried out, all at the sole
expense of Tridel;
d) all permits pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06 be obtained by Tridel prior to
commencement of any construction;
e) any TRCA-owned lands disturbed by the proposed works be revegetated/stabilized
following construction and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff and City of
Toronto staff, a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval in
accordance with existing TRCA and City of Toronto landscaping guidelines;
f) Tridel and the City of Toronto are to fully indemnify and save harmless TRCA from any
and all claims for injuries, damages or loss of any nature resulting in any way either
directly or indirectly from the granting of this easement or the resulting construction;
g) any additional considerations as deemed appropriate by TRCA staff or its solicitors;
THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with
Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27 as amended,
if required;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may
be required to implement the easement agreement, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the signing and execution of any documents.
CARRIED
458
RES.#A192/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed
Ravines of Islington Holdings Inc., CFN 49571. Acquisition of property
located south of Langstaff Road and west of Islington Avenue in the City
of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, under the 'Greenlands
Acquisition Project for 2011-2015', Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Humber River watershed.
(Executive Res.#8132/13)
Moved by: Mike Mattos
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT 0.208 hectares (0.514 acres), more or less, of vacant land, being Part 26 on Plan
65R-34474, located south of Langstaff Road and west of Islington Avenue, City of
Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, be purchased from Ravines of Islington
Holdings Inc.;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land
free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT TRCA solicitors, Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at
the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A193/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed
Averton Common (Kleinburg) Inc., CFN 49870. Purchase of property
located to the rear of 10360 and 10384 Islington Avenue - Kleinburg, City
of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Greenlands
Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Humber River watershed.
(Executive Res.#8133/13)
Moved by: Mike Mattos
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
459
THAT 0.47 hectares (1.16 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 23,
Concession 8 and designated as Parts 3, 4, 5 and 6 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by
Schaeffer Dzaldov Bennett Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Job No. 12-432-03C,
dated October 16, 2013, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, located to the
rear of 10360 & 10384 Islington Avenue- Kleinburg, be purchased from Averton Common
(Kleinburg) Inc.;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the
lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest
possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A194/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed
Delmanor Prince Edward Inc., CFN 49872. Purchase of property located
to the rear of 4180-4190 Dundas Street West, City of Toronto - Etobicoke
York Community Council Area, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project
for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River
watershed.
(Executive Res.#8134/13)
Moved by: Mike Mattos
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT 0.19 hectares (0.47 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 10,
Concession C, FTH and designated as Parts 1 and 4 on Plan 66R-27060, City of Toronto-
Etobicoke York Community Council Area, located to the rear of 4180-4190 Dundas Street
West, be purchased from Delmanor Prince Edward Inc.;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the
lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest
possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
460
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A195/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed
1275621 Ontario Inc., CFN 49932. Purchase of property located on the
south side of Major Mackenzie Drive, east of Dufferin Street, City of
Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Greenlands
Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Don River watershed.
(Executive Res.#8135/13)
Moved by: Mike Mattos
Seconded by: Colleen Jordan
THAT 4.13 hectares (10.21 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 20,
Concession 2 and designated as Block 57 on a Draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by
Schaeffer & Dzaldov Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors, Drawing No. Al, dated August 14,
2006, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, located on the south side of Major
Mackenzie Drive, east of Dufferin Street, be purchased from 1275621 Ontario Inc.;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the
lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest
possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A196/13 - USE OF RESOURCES DURING AN ELECTION
Approval of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Policy. Approval
of policy and receipt of procedures on Use of Resources During an
Election.
(Executive Res.#8136/13)
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Maria Augimeri
461
THAT item EX7.6 - Use of Resources During an Election be referred back to staff for
report at a future Authority meeting.
CARRIED
RES.#A197/13 - 2014 FEE SCHEDULE FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND
PROGRAMMING
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 2014 Fee Schedule for Public
Facilities and Programming.
(Executive Res.#8137/13)
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT the 2014 Fee Schedule for Public Facilities and Programming be amended as set
out in Attachment 1, and become effective January 1, 2014.
CARRIED
RES.#A198/13 - PLANNING AND PERMIT ADMINISTRATION
Continuous Strategic Improvements and Delegation of Permit Approvals.
To delegate approval authority for non-complex permit applications
under Ontario Regulation 166/06 as amended, to designated staff and to
report on additional and ongoing improvements to the administration and
delivery of TRCA's planning and regulatory programs.
(Executive Res.#8138/13)
Moved by: Jack Heath
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), through its Business
Excellence objective, is committed to streamline administrative processes associated
with the implementation of TRCA's planning and regulatory programs, for the benefit of all
municipal partners, the development community and public stakeholders;
AND WHEREAS TRCA's 'Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to
Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation', Ontario Regulation 166/06 as amended by
Ontario Regulation 82/13, enables the Authority to delegate positive permit approval
authority to designated staff;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the delegation of permit approvals to staff
appointed as Enforcement Officers, in accordance with the criteria outlined in this report,
be approved and implemented.
462
AMENDMENT
RES.#A199/13
Moved by: Jack Heath
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT the following be added after the main motion:
AND FURTHER THAT the Chief Executive Officer be given the discretion to require any
permit to be directed to the Executive Committee for approval.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
THE RESULTANT MOTION READS AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), through its Business
Excellence objective, is committed to streamline administrative processes associated
with the implementation of TRCA's planning and regulatory programs, for the benefit of all
municipal partners, the development community and public stakeholders;
AND WHEREAS TRCA's 'Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to
Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation', Ontario Regulation 166/06 as amended by
Ontario Regulation 82/13, enables the Authority to delegate positive permit approval
authority to designated staff;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the delegation of permit approvals to staff
appointed as Enforcement Officers, in accordance with the criteria outlined in this report,
be approved and implemented;
AND FURTHER THAT the Chief Executive Officer be given the discretion to require any
permit to be directed to the Executive Committee for approval.
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES.#A200/13 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by: Glenn Mason
Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT Section II item EX8.1 - Environics Analytics Ltd., contained in Executive Commitee
Minutes #9/13, held on November 1, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
463
SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
RES.#A201/13 - WATERSHED COMMITTEE MINUTES
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: John Sprovieri
THAT Section IV item AUTH8.1 -Watershed Committee Minutes, be received.
CARRIED
Section IV Item AUTH8.1
DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL
Minutes of Meeting #4/13, held on September 19, 2013
HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE
Minutes of Meeting #3/13, held on September 17, 2013
PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN
Minutes of Meeting #2/13, held on June 6, 2013
Minutes of Meeting #3/13, held on September 26, 2013.
ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06 (AS AMENDED)
RES.#A202/13 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06 (AS AMENDED)
Moved by: Colleen Jordan
Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06 (as amended) items EX10.2 - EX10.82, contained in
Executive Committee Minutes #9/13, held on November 1, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
RES.#A203/13 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06 (AS AMENDED)
Moved by: Maria Augimeri
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06 (as amended) item EX10.1 - City of Brampton, contained
in Executive Committee Minutes #9/13, held on November 1, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
464
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:10 p.m., on Friday, November 22, 2013.
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Brian Denney
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/ks
465
Toronto and Region
**' " Conservation
Authority
MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY#10/13
January 10, 2014
The Authority Meeting #10/13, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village,
on Friday, January 10, 2014. The Vice Chair Maria Augimeri, called the meeting to order
at 9:51 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Vice Chair
David Barrow Member
Ben Cachola Member
Ronald Chopowick Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Chris Fonseca Member
Mujeeb Khan Member
Mike Mattos Member
Linda Pabst Member
Dave Ryan Member
Deb Schulte Member
John Sprovieri Member
Cynthia Thorburn Member
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
Richard Whitehead Member
ABSENT
Paul Ainslie Member
Bob Callahan Member
Raymond Cho Member
Vincent Crisanti Member
Glenn De Baeremaeker Member
Jack Heath Member
Colleen Jordan Member
Gloria Lindsay Luby Member
Glenn Mason Member
Peter Milczyn Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Chair
John Parker Member
Anthony Perruzza Member
Jim Tovey Member
466
RES.#A204/13 - MINUTES
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Linda Pabst
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #9/13, held on November 22, 2013, be approved.
CARRIED
PRESENTATION
(a) A presentation by Darryl Gray, Senior Manager, Education, TRCA, and Ron Halliday,
Abilities Centre, in regard to Claremont Field Centre Accessibility Upgrades Capital
Campaign.
RES.#A205/13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT above-noted presentation (a) be deferred to Authority Meeting #11/13, scheduled
to be held on January 31, 2013.
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#A206/13 - ACCESSIBILITY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES POLICY AND
MULTI-YEAR PLAN
Approval of Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities Policy and receipt of
Multi-Year Accessibility Plan.
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Accessibility for Persons
with Disabilities Policy, as outlined in Attachment 1, be approved and be made publicly
available;
AND FURTHER THAT the Multi-Year Accessibility Plan, as outlined in Attachment 2, be
received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
TRCA is committed to creating and providing inclusive programs, services and spaces to all
members of our communities. To achieve this requires the identification and removal of barriers
to participation, including social, cultural, economic and physical. A key component of this
program of removing barriers to participation is the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities
Act (AO DA).
467
Enacted in 2005, the AODA will guide Ontario to become barrier-free by January 1, 2025 and
was developed to assist organizations in the public, private and not-for-profit sectors in
identifying barriers to accessibility. It includes standards in:
• Customer Service;
• Information and Communications;
• Employment;
• Transportation;
• Design of Public Spaces.
All standards, with the exception of Transportation, apply to TRCA.
The Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation 191/11 (IASR) was enacted under the AODA,
and requires the development of a multi-year plan to prevent and remove barriers for persons
with disabilities.
The TRCA Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities Policy ensures that TRCA meets its
requirements within the AODA and its associated standards, including the IASR and the
Accessibility Standards for Customer Service Regulation 429/07 (ASCS). The TRCA
Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities Plan will guide TRCA towards improving opportunities
for persons with disabilities and ensure that TRCA remains in compliance with AODA and the
aforementioned standards.
TRCA is considered a large organization under the IASR given that it employs over 400
full-time, 300 part-time and 300 seasonal staff in a variety of work environments.
The TRCA Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities Plan 2014-2023 outlines the steps that
TRCA must take to improve opportunities for persons with disabilities, as required by the
AODA, as well as an Accessibility Improvement Schedule.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Attachment 3 indicates the requirements and associated deadlines that TRCA must meet to
remain in compliance with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 and its
associated standards, including the Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation 191/11 and
the Accessibility Standards for Customer Service (Ontario Regulation 429/07).
Attachment 4 indicates improvements and associated timelines that TRCA has identified to
accelerate compliance with AODA and its associated standards, including IASR and Ontario
Regulation 429/07.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Budget for components and activities identified within the Multi-Year Accessibility Plan is
integrated into individual project and program budgets.
Report prepared by: Darryl Gray, (416) 791-0327
Emails: dgray @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Darryl Gray, (416) 791-0327
Emails: dgray @trca.on.ca
Date: November 15, 2013
Attachments: 4
468
Attachment 1
ACCESSIBILITY FOR ONTARIANS WITH DISABILITIES POLICY
Rationale
The purpose of this Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities Policy is to fulfill the requirements
set out in Ontario Regulations 429/07 and 191/11 and the AODA, as well as meet current and
future strategic objectives related to a broader program of providing access to programs,
services and spaces. It will establish a policy for TRCA to identify and remove barriers to access
for persons with disabilities. This policy complements TRCA's existing Accessibility Standards
for Customer Service Policy.
Policy
TRCA is committed to treating all people in a way that allows them to maintain their dignity and
independence. TRCA believes in integration and equal opportunity. TRCA is committed to
meeting the needs of people with disabilities in timely manner. It will do so by meeting
accessibility requirements under the AODA and by preventing and removing barriers to
accessibility wherever possible. These will be enhanced by the actions detailed in TRCA's
Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities Plan.
TRCA recognizes that certain conditions, such as but not limited to the prohibitive cost of
updates, damage to the natural environment or the destruction of historic structures and
features, may make it difficult or impossible to remove all barriers to full participation. In such
cases, reasonable alternatives will be provided.
TRCA shall use reasonable efforts to ensure that its policies, practices and procedures are
consistent with its requirements under the AODA. Continued training regarding the
requirements of the AODA and their application at TRCA will be provided and supported by the
Management of TRCA.
Application
This policy shall apply to:
• All TRCA employees, agents, volunteers or otherwise, especially those who deal with
members of the public, interns and vendors on behalf of TRCA
• All information and communications prepared by or for TRCA
• All public spaces operated by TRCA.
Procedures and guidelines pursuant to the Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities Policy shall
be developed to ensure audit implementation compliance.
469
Attachment 2
ACCESSIBILITY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES MULTI-YEAR PLAN
Training
TRCA will provide training to employees, volunteers and other staff members on Ontario's
accessibility laws and regulations and on the Human Rights Code as it relates to people with
disabilities. Training will be provided in a way that best suits the needs of community members
and the duties of employees, volunteers and other staff members. This may include a variety of
formats such as presentations and e-learning modules.
TRCA will take the following steps to ensure employees are provided with the training needed
to meet Ontario's accessibility laws and regulations by January 1, 2015.
• Ensure that every person who participates in the development of the policy, practices
and procedures under the IASR and ASCS is trained appropriately in relation to TRCA's
corresponding policies and procedures.
• Ensure that every person who deals with the public on behalf of TRCA, including third
parties (i.e. employees, agents, volunteers, management) must complete training in
relation to TRCA's accessibility for persons with disabilities policies and procedures.
• New employees, agents, volunteers, management, etc. shall receive training as soon as
practicable, after being assigned.
• Ongoing training on changes to policies, procedures, and new equipment shall be
provided. The method and amount of training shall be geared to the trainee's level of
responsibility in responding to the standards of the AODA.
• Training records, including the dates when the training was provided, number of
individuals to whom the training was provided, shall be kept.
TRCA initiated training of current employees, agents, volunteers, management, etc. in 2011,
with all employees at the time having received training by January 1, 2012. Subsequent new
employees, agents, volunteers, management, etc. received training as they were hired.
Self-service Kiosks
The IASR defines kiosk as an interactive electronic terminal, including a point-of-sale device,
intended for public use that allows users to access one or more services or products or both
[0. Reg. 191/11, s. 6 (5)]. TRCA will take the following steps to ensure that employees consider
the needs of people with disabilities when designing, procuring or acquiring permanent and
temporary self-service kiosks by January 1, 2014.
• Ensure that every staff member involved in the design, procurement or acquisition of
self-service kiosks evaluates the technical and structural features of the kiosk in terms of
the kiosk's accessibility for persons with disabilities.
• Ensure that every staff member involved in the location and installation of self-service
kiosks considers the accessibility of the path to the kiosk for persons with disabilities.
When accessible self-service kiosks are not possible, alternative methods for accessing one or
more services or products or both will be provided.
470
Accessible Emergency Information
TRCA is committed to providing its customers and clients with publicly available emergency
information. This will be accomplished by providing updates through the TRCA website and
electronic mailing lists and at information kiosks at TRCA facilities. All information will be made
in an accessible format at no additional charge upon request.
TRCA will also provide individualized emergency response information to employees with
disabilities when necessary. With the employee's consent, TRCA shall provide the emergency
response information to the individual designated to assist the employee. The individualized
emergency response information shall be reviewed when the employee changes work
locations within the organization, when the employee's accommodation needs are reviewed
and when TRCA updates its general emergency response policies.
Customer Service
TRCA is committed to serving all its customers to the best of its ability. This means that persons
with disabilities will receive goods and services with the same high quality and timeliness as
others. In order to do so, TRCA must provide customized solutions based on an understanding
of the disability and/or barrier.
TRCA has already adopted the following policies, practices and procedures to ensure that
customer service is accessible to persons with disabilities.
• Goods or services will be provided in a manner that respects the dignity and
independence of persons with disabilities.
• The provision of goods or services to persons with disabilities and others will be
integrated unless an alternate measure is necessary, whether temporarily or on a
permanent basis, to enable a person with a disability to obtain, use or benefit from the
goods or services.
• Persons with disabilities will be given an opportunity equal to that given to others to
obtain, use and benefit from the goods or services.
• Persons with disabilities may use assistive devices and/or support persons in the
access of goods and services.
• TRCA employees communicating with a person with a disability shall do so in a manner
that takes into account the person's disability.
Feedback from our customers provides TRCA with opportunities to learn and improve. TRCA
recognizes the right of our customers to make a complaint, to compliment, or to suggest ways
to improve our services. TRCA will take the following steps to ensure existing feedback
processes are accessible to persons with disabilities at no additional cost upon request by
January 1, 2015.
• To assist TRCA in ensuring the delivery of goods and services to those with disabilities
is provided in an effective and timely manner, the customer is invited to provide their
feedback as follows in writing, in person, e-mail, or telephone, addressed to the
designated representative for TRCA.
• The designated representative will respond either in writing, in person, e-mail or
telephone acknowledging receipt of feedback and will set out the action to be taken in
response to any complaints.
471
• TRCA employees will continue to respond in a timely and respectful manner to feedback
received on matters regarding accessibility for persons with disabilities.
Information and Communications
TRCA is committed to meeting the information and communication needs of persons with
disabilities. The information we provide and the manner in which we communicate are key to
delivering programs and services to the public. TRCA will consult with people with disabilities to
determine their information and communication needs.
The TRCA website and content on its pages has conformed to Web Content Accessibility
Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0, Level A since 2010. Guidelines for content development are coupled
with training sessions for web content managers.
TRCA will take the following steps to make sure all publicly available information is made
accessible upon request by January 1, 2016.
• Research and provide general guidelines for accessible format development to all staff.
• Ensure that TRCA Marketing and Communications designers receive detailed guidelines
on how to make information available in accessible formats.
• Incorporate accessible features into communication mediums, such as Braille into
way-finding signs and American Sign Language interpreters at public meetings when
requested.
TRCA will take the following steps to make all websites and content conform to WCAG 2.0,
Level AA by January 1, 2021.
• Update the guidelines and training for web content development to reflect the
requirements of WCAG 2.0, Level AA.
• Ensure that all staff who manages web content receives training on the requirements of
WCAG 2.0, Level AA.
Employment
TRCA is committed to fair and accessible employment practices that attract and retain talented
employees, and to limiting systemic biases in accommodation. As such, TRCA is committed to
meeting the requirements in the Employment Standards of the IASR.
TRCA will take the following steps to notify the public and staff that, when requested, TRCA will
accommodate people with disabilities during the recruitment and assessment processes and
when people are hired by January 1, 2016.
• During the recruitment process, TRCA shall notify its employees and the public about
the availability of accommodation for applicants with disabilities. This will be included in
the job posting.
• TRCA shall notify job applicants who are invited to participate in the selection process
for a job that accommodations are available upon request pertaining to the
materials/processes to be used. If the applicant requests such an accommodation,
TRCA shall consult with the applicant and provide for suitable accommodation with the
ultimate decision resting with TRCA.
472
• TRCA shall notify the successful applicant of TRCA's policies for accommodating
employees with disabilities.
TRCA will take the following steps to develop and put in place a process for developing
individual accommodation plans for employees with disabilities and return-to-work policies for
employees that have been absent due to a disability by January 1, 2016.
• TRCA shall develop and have in place a formal process for the development of
documented individual accommodation plans for employees with disabilities. These
plans will document the accessible formats/communication supports, and include
individualized workplace emergency response information and other accommodations
provided. The development process shall include:
• the manner that the individual requesting the accommodation can participate in
the development of the plan;
• the means by which the employee is assessed;
• the manner in which TRCA can request an evaluation by an outside expert (at
TRCA's expense) to determine if and how accommodation can be achieved;
• the manner in which the employee can request participation by the bargaining
agent or another representative;
• the steps taken to protect privacy;
• the frequency that plans will be reviewed and updated;
• if an individual accommodation plan is denied, the manner that the employee will
be notified of the denial;
• the means of providing the individual accommodation plan in a format that takes
into account the disability.
• Not overriding any other return to work process, TRCA shall develop a return to work
process that includes a documentation process for those who have been absent due to
a disability and require a disability related accommodation to return to work. The
process shall outline the steps TRCA will take to facilitate the return to work and will use
documented individual accommodation plans.
TRCA will take the following steps to ensure the accessibility needs of employees with
disabilities are taken into account when conducting performance management, career
development and redeployment processes by January 1, 2016.
• When conducting performance management processes, TRCA shall take into account
the accessibility needs of employees with disabilities and individual accommodation
plans.
• When providing career development opportunities and advancements to its employees,
TRCA shall take into account the accessibility needs of employees with disabilities and
individual accommodation plans.
• When redeploying employees, TRCA shall take into account the accessibility needs of
employees with disabilities and individual accommodation plans.
TRCA will take the following steps to prevent and remove other accessibility barriers identified
by January 1, 2016.
• Notify current employees of its policies used to support employees with disabilities
including job accommodations.
473
• Notify new employees as soon as possible as to TRCA's policies/practices with respect
to accessibility and provide information to all employees when changes are made to
existing accessibility policies.
• When an employee with a disability requests it, TRCA will consult with the employee
then provide the information needed to perform their job, plus any other information that
is available to other employees in accessible formats/communication support that is
suitable, with the ultimate decision resting with TRCA.
Design of Public Spaces
TRCA is committed to greater accessibility for persons with disabilities within and around its
buildings and public spaces. As such, TRCA is dedicated to meeting the requirements of the
Design of Public Spaces component of the IASR, whenever possible. However, TRCA
recognizes that the natural characteristics of much of the land owned by TRCA and the cultural
heritage features of some of its structures present limitations on the extent to which TRCA can
develop fully accessible built features and remove barriers to accessibility for persons with
disabilities. TRCA will communicate what does and does not meet the requirements of the
Design of Public Spaces standard of the IASR and will provide alternatives wherever possible.
Nonetheless, TRCA will take the following steps to ensure that all new and redeveloped public
spaces are designed to meet Ontario's accessible laws by January 1, 2017.
• Consult with people with disabilities when designing public spaces, as required in the
IASR.
• Design and maintain all public spaces to meet the requirements of the Design of Public
Spaces standard of the IASR, unless an exception can be made.
• Comply with the Ontario Building Code's barrier-free standards.
• Reasons for exceptions to the requirements will be documented by the project manager
and retained in the TRCA corporate file for the project, as well as filed with TRCA's
accessibility lead.
Review, Update and Report
The update of current accessibility policies and the development of a multi-year action plan are
not the end of TRCA's commitment to removing and preventing barriers for persons with
disabilities. TRCA will do the following as it relates to TRCA's accessibility policies and
multi-year accessibility plan.
• Continue to conform to the regulatory requirements, whenever possible.
• Monitor and audit accessibility improvements to ensure continued compliance with the
AODA and its corresponding standards.
• Report on improvements to accessibility for persons with disabilities to TRCA Directors
Committee on an annual basis.
• Prepare and make publicly available a report on accessibility achievements on an
annual basis.
• Review and update the multi-year accessibility plan every five years.
For More Information
Questions and/or comments about the TRCA Accessibility Plan are always welcome. Please
contact Darryl Gray, Senior Manager, Education
474
Phone: 416-791-0327
Email: dgrav(trca.on.ca
Fax: 905-773-0225
Website: http://www.trca.on.ca
Since 2005, the Accessibility Directorate of Ontario (ADO) has been working with the disability,
private and public sectors to develop and enforce accessibility standards, and promote greater
accessibility awareness throughout Ontario. Contact the ADO for more information about the
AODA, the IASR, the ASCS and resources on how to make Ontario accessible for everyone.
Toll-free: 1-866-515-2025
TTY: 416-325-3408/Toll-free: 1-800-268-7095
Email: accessibilitv(?ontario.ca
Website: http://ontario.ca/Access0N
Free resources available at publications.serviceontario.ca
Alternate formats of this document are available free upon request.
475
Attachment 3
DUE DATE STREAM REQUIREMENT
Already Customer Service Standard All requirements
Employment Standard Workplace emergency response information
Information and Emergency information
Communication Standard
January 1, 2014 General Accessibility policies
I Multi-year accessibility plan
Self-service kiosks
Information and Accessible websites and web content (new
Communication Standard only)
January 1, 2015 General Training
Information and Feedback
Communication Standard
January 1, 2016 Employment Standard Information for employees
Processes to accommodate employees
Information and Accessible formats and communication
Communication Standard supports
January 1, 2017 Design of Public Spaces Recreational trails and beach access routes
Standard Outdoor public use eating areas
Outdoor play spaces
Exterior paths of travel
Parking
Obtaining service
Maintenance
January 1, 2021 Information and Accessible websites and web content (all)
Communication Standard
476
Attachment 4
TERM PROJECT NAME PROJECT LEAD TARGET
DATE
On-going General Website Accessibility Improvements Marketing and On-going
Communications
Communication Material Accessibility Marketing and On-going
Improvements Communications
Staff Training Human Resources, Parks and On-going
Culture
Trail and Facilities Assessments Conservation Lands On-going
Subsidized Program/service Tracking Parks and Culture On-going
Accessibility Working Group TRCA Accessibility Lead On-going
Accessibility Promotion All On-going
Information Sharing TRCA Accessibility Lead On-going
Funding All On-going
Accessible Communication Templates and TRCA Accessibility Lead On-going
Guidelines
Immediate, Annual Progress Report Accessibility Working Group On-going
2014 Accommodation Program Human Resources On-going
Ropes Courses Conservation Parks 2014 and
future
Redesigned Trail Map Kortright Centre for 2014 and
Conservation future
Accessibility Policy TRCA Accessibility Lead Jan. 2014
Multi-year Accessibility Plan 2013-2021 TRCA Accessibility Lead Jan. 2014
External Accessibility Advisory Committee TRCA Accessibility Lead 2014
Monitoring Program TRCA Accessibility Lead 2014
Accessibility Review Process TRCA Accessibility Lead 2014
Procurement Requirements, including Project Management Office 2014
self-service kiosks
Washroom Renovations Albion Hills Field Centre 2014
Washroom and Entrance Retrofits Claremont Field Centre 2014
On-trail Identification of Accessibility Kortright Centre for 2014
Conservation
Virtual Tour of Archetype House Kortright Centre for 2014
Conservation
Alternative Maple Syrup Demonstration Area Kortright Centre for 2014
Conservation
Wheelchair Ramp Installation at Doctor's Black Creek Pioneer Village 2014
House
Braille Buttons in Elevator Black Creek Pioneer Village 2014
Short Term, Update #1 of TRCA's multi-year accessibility TRCA Accessibility Lead 2018
2015-2018 plan
Medium Term, Update #2 of TRCA's multi-year accessibility TRCA Accessibility Lead 2023
2019-2023 plan
Long Term, Continued updating of TRCA's multi-year TRCA Accessibility Lead Every five
2023 and beyond accessibility plan years
477
RES.#A207/13 - GREENWOOD CONSERVATION LANDS MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Report back to the Authority confirming municipal endorsements of the
Greenwood Conservation Lands Master Plan.
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT confirmation of endorsement of the Greenwood Conservation Lands Master Plan by
the Town of Ajax and the City of Pickering be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff continue to consult with the Technical Advisory Committee
(municipal partners) and Public Advisory Committee throughout the implementation of
the Greenwood Conservation Lands Master Plan.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #9/12, held on November 30, 2012 Resolution #A219/12 was approved as
follows:
THAT the draft Greenwood Conservation Lands Master Plan dated November 2012 be
approved in principle;
THAT the draft Plan be circulated to the Town of Ajax and the City of Pickering requesting
endorsement of the Plan;
THAT following circulation and approval at the municipal level, staff report back to the
Authority to confirm approval of the final Plan;
THAT the lands referred to as "Brock North", "Brock South", "Roder Property"and
"Greenwood Conservation Lands" respectively, be renamed and collectively referred to
as the "Greenwood Conservation Lands" and this be communicated to all relevant
stakeholders;
AND FURTHER THAT staff proceed to plan and implement the Master Plan's priority
projects in the short-term (2013-2014) in partnership with project stakeholders.
Subsequently staff made a presentation to Pickering Council on May 13, 2013 and Pickering
council passed the following motion:
That the Greenwood Conservation Lands Master Plan dated November 2012 be
endorsed by Council;
The Greenwood Conservation Lands Master Plan was then presented and subsequently
endorsed by the Town of Ajax General Governance Committee on October 10, 2013, where the
following motion was carried:
That Council endorse the Greenwood Conservation Lands-Master Plan, prepared by the
Greenwood Conservation Lands Public Advisory Committee and the Conservation Lands
Group, Toronto And Region Conservation, and
478
That Council authorize staff to enter into discussion with Toronto and Region
Conservation to develop a management agreement that includes the existing Greenwood
Conservation Area and the Brock South Lands.
The Greenwood Conservation Lands (GCL), a grouping of four parcels, Brock North, Brock
South, Rodar and Greenwood Conservation Area, totaling 689 hectares (1,704 acres) is located
within the Duffins Creek watershed in the Regional Municipality of Durham, GCL borders the
Town of Ajax and the City of Pickering. Additionally, it is adjacent to Highway 7 in the north and
Taunton Road to the south and is located between Sideline 16 and Greenwood Road west and
east respectively.
The Master Plan addresses a wide variety of property management initiatives including site
securement and protection, community engagement opportunities and cultural heritage
protection, all while providing opportunities for passive nature-based recreation on the
properties. Key project components include an updated series of management zones,
management recommendations, a property wide trail and recreation plan and a detailed
budget and implementation schedule prioritizing work over the next ten years.
While the Greenwood Conservation Lands Master Plan was completed prior to the completion
of TRCA's Building The Living City: 10-Year Strategic Plan 2013-2022 , the Management Plan
aligns with many of the priorities outlined in the Strategic Plan, including the following
objectives and actions:
• create a network of greenspace and green infrastructure that weaves through every
community to connect a healthy and resilient landscape;
• more people engaging with nature more often;
• improved protection of Toronto region's natural systems;
• work with our partners to identify and protect the significant spaces in our region that
are sensitive and ecologically important that will benefit from careful control of
community use;
• more community members contributing to watershed, community and sustainability
planning;
• maximum impact from use of funds and resources through efficiencies and
partnerships; and
• work with our municipal, provincial and federal partners to assign the management of
public lands in order to make more efficient and effective use of our combined
resources.
Recent Initiatives
Since November 2012, TRCA has invested roughly$140,000 into priority projects relating to the
implementation of the Greenwood Conservation Lands Master Plan. Projects include site
securement (installing fencing and gates and removing safety hazards), informal trail closures,
dumping clean-up, parking lot expansion and community newsletter distribution. These
projects have helped to secure the property from unauthorized and harmful uses, and are
building the foundation elements of the plan.
479
Recent Trail Initiatives
The Trans Canada Trail (TCT) organization has provided approximately $95,000 to support trail
improvement work on the proposed TCT re-route through the property. This funding
opportunity is in conjunction with the TCT connection program slated for 2017 completion. As
part of officially designating the TCT through the property, the funding allocated from this grant
has been matched by TRCA. Property improvements include a parking lot expansion,
construction of three trail re-routes, three pedestrian bridges, a viewing platform, an accessible
trail and various boardwalk sections. In total, the new Trans Canada Trail will be approximately
5.4 km in length and will help to draw an increased number of users to the Region of Durham,
the City of Pickering, the Town of Ajax and the Greenwood Conservation Lands.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The successful implementation of the Master Plan for the GCL will require the efforts of TRCA
and its partners.
TRCA will take the following actions:
• Request that Town of Ajax and City of Pickering include the Master Plan in their respective
jurisdiction's planning and land use policies and practices for the area.
• Publish and distribute the Greenwood Conservation Lands Master Plan to relevant
stakeholders and seek necessary consultation.
• Work to extend the existing management agreement with Town of Ajax to include the Brock
South parcel.
• Establish a stewardship committee and trail captains program utilizing the existing public
advisory committee members and the local community with appropriate representation
from stakeholder groups to assist with the implementation of the Master Plan.
• Plan to implement the priority projects in the short-term (2013-2014) with the project
partners.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The total cost to implement the GCL Master Plan is estimated at$3,415,000 over seven years.
It should be noted that these are preliminary budget estimates and schedules. All projects are
subject to discussion with the potential funding partners and refinement of project
requirements.
Staff will be approaching Town of Ajax, City of Pickering, local community groups and other
interested stakeholders to share in the cost of Plan implementation over the next seven years.
TRCA has projected that it would be possible to cover 80% or$2,766,155 of the implementation
costs by allocating a portion of the revenues gained from the restoration project in Brock North
and South. These funds have been budgeted and are available for implementation projects
under account(s) 109-76 and 109-77.
Report prepared by: Mike Goodyear, extension 5578
Emails: mgoodyear @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Mike Bender, extension 5287
Emails: mbender @trca.on.ca
Date: December 9, 2013
480
RES.#A208/13 - THE LIVING CITY TRANSITION PRACTICE
Award of Preferred Source Consultant Contract. Award of contract for
consulting services on a preferred source basis to assist in the
development of The Living City Transition Practice program.
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: David Barrow
WHEREAS Building The Living City, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA)
2013-2022 Strategic Plan, identifies "Facilitate a Regional Approach to Sustainability" as
one of twelve strategies that will guide TRCA's activities over the next ten years;
AND WHEREAS the initiation of this strategy will require an innovative, carefully designed
process that creates alignment and coordinates action among partners and stakeholders;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the contract for the development of a program
to define TRCA's approach for facilitating and accelerating progress on regional
sustainability be awarded to The Next Practice Ltd. at a total cost not to exceed
$50,450.00 plus HST.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #3/13, held on April 26, 2013, the Authority endorsed Building The Living
City, an update to the TRCA strategic plan for 2013-2022. Building The Living City reaffirmed
The Living City vision for a socially and environmentally sustainable region, and articulated a
continuing and ever more important role for TRCA in helping to translate this vision into reality.
One of the twelve strategic priorities identified for TRCA over the next 10 years is to "Facilitate a
Regional Approach to Sustainability" by orienting TRCA programs towards regional
sustainability goals, aligning and coordinating the efforts of regional leaders and stakeholders,
and accelerating innovative initiatives that put sustainability into action in our communities
TRCA staff proposes to develop The Living City Transition Practice. Following successful
models of private and public sector sustainability innovation, the proposed transition practice
will bring together businesses, governments and communities to create integrated financial,
policy and technical solutions to our region's sustainability challenges. In collaboration with
partners, these solutions will be piloted, market-tested and scaled-up so they have impact
across the region.
RATIONALE
Staff recommends retaining The Next Practice Ltd. to support the next phase of TRCA action on
regional sustainability, following the direction of Building The Living City. The Next Practice is
an international innovation management consulting company, based in Toronto, which
specializes in supporting private and public sector clients to design products, programs and
services that deliver economic value while addressing social and ecological sustainability
challenges. The Next Practice was co-founded in 2004 by Jeb Brugmann, one of the world's
foremost experts on urban and community sustainability and the founder and 1991-2000
Secretary General of ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability, a worldwide association of
municipal governments which is credited with creating the global sustainable communities
movement.
481
The Next Practice will assist TRCA in developing The Living City Transition Practice and
building staff capacity by:
1. demonstrating how transition practice can develop transformative new solutions for
sustainability issues using an existing TRCA program, such as Partners in Project Green, as
a flagship transition project;
2. helping TRCA define and scope the transition practice program and identify the regional
sustainability issues and opportunities that require attention;
3. designing and launching a coalition of leaders and stakeholders who will undertake
regional sustainability transition projects together; and
4. supporting TRCA staff in establishing and piloting a strategic design studio, a process and
a work space for bringing together stakeholders to collaborate on the design of innovative
regional sustainability solutions.
The Next Practice has provided a proposal for their services in the amount of$50,450.00 plus
HST. Staff feels that the proposal clearly demonstrates significant value for TRCA and
recommends that The Next Practice be retained on a preferred source basis. A preferred
source purchase is warranted in this case as both The Next Practice and the project lead, Jeb
Brugmann, have highly specialized expertise in community sustainability and integrated
sustainability transition practice that is not otherwise available to TRCA. This meets Section
9.3.3 of TRCA's Purchasing Policy as follows:
The required goods and services are to be supplied by a vendor or supplier having
specialized knowledge, skills, expertise or experience that cannot be reasonably
provided by any other supplier.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding will be finalized in the 2014 budget.
Report prepared by: Ryan Ness, extension 5615
Emails: rness @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Brian Denney, extension 6290
Emails: bdenney @trca.on.ca
Date: December 11, 2013
RES.#A209/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed
Villa Parso Home Corporation, CFN 49954. Acquisition of property
located south of Bethesda Side Road and west of Ninth Line in the Town
of Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York, under the 'Greenlands
Acquisition Project for 2011-2015', Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Rouge River watershed.
(Executive Res.#8145/13)
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: David Barrow
482
THAT 4.79 hectares (11.84 acres), more or less, of vacant land, being Block 129 on draft
M-Plan by J.D. Barnes, Reference No. 10-21-239-00-MP, located south of Bethesda Side
Road and west of Ninth Line, Town of Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York, be
purchased from Villa Parso Home Corporation;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land
free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT TRCA solicitors, Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at
the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A210/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed
Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York
Angela and Luigi Marsiglio, CFN 49466. Acquisition of property located at
360 19th Avenue, on the north side of 19th Avenue and west of Bayview
Avenue in the Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York,
under the 'Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015', Flood Plain and
Conservation Component, Rouge River watershed.
(Executive Res.#8146/13)
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT 0.12 hectares (0.30 acres), more or less, of vacant land, being Part of South Half of
Lot 56, Concession 1, designated as Block 10 on draft M-Plan prepared by Hunt Surveys
Inc. OLS under job no. 61407-MPLAN-04.dwg, together with an easement for access,
Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, be purchased from Angela and
Luigi Marsiglio;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land
free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete
the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental
to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
483
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including the obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A211/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed
Advent Health Care Corporation, CFN 50173. Purchase of property
located to the south of Finch Avenue West and west of Arnott Avenue, in
the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), under the
"Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and
Conservation Component, Don River watershed.
(Executive Res.#8147/13)
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT 2.13 hectares (5.26 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 20,
Concession 2, WYS, (City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area)), and
designated as Part 1 on the Plan of Survey prepared by Stantec Geomatics Ltd., Ontario
Land Surveyors, under their Project No. 161670002, dated November 14, 2013, , located
south of Finch Avenue West and west of Arnott Avenue, be purchased from Advent Health
Care Corporation;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the
lands free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest
possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A212/13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed
Marshall Homes (Riverside) Ltd., CFN 50183. Purchase of property
located south of Rossland Road West and east of Brock Road in the
Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham, under the "Greenlands
Acquisition Project for 2011-2015", Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Duffins Creek watershed.
(Executive Res.#8148/13)
484
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT 0.789 hectares (1.950 acres), more or less, of vacant land, being Lot 12 on
registered Plan M-1157 and designated as Part 12, 16, 17 and 18 on Plan 40R-28157,
Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham, located to the east of Brock Road, south
of Rossland Road West, be purchased from Marshall Homes (Riverside) Ltd.;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land
free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT TRCA solicitors, Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at
the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A213/13 - CITY OF TORONTO
Request for a Permanent Easement for the Replacement of a Portion of
the Burke Brook Ravine Sub Trunk Sanitary Sewer,
City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed, CFN 50170. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to
provide a permanent easement for the replacement of a portion of the
Burke Brook Ravine Sub Trunk Sanitary Sewer located east of Bayview
Avenue and north of Glenvale Boulevard, in the City of Toronto (North
York Community Council Area), Don River watershed.
(Executive Res.#8149/13)
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: David Barrow
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request
from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for the replacement of a
portion of the Burke Brook Ravine Sub Trunk Sanitary Sewer located east of Bayview
Avenue and north of Glenvale Boulevard, City of Toronto (North York Community Council
Area), Don River watershed;
AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in
Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Toronto in
this instance;
485
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of
0.21 hectares (0.52 acres), more or less, be granted to the City of Toronto for the
replacement of a portion of the Burke Brook Ravine Sub Trunk Sanitary Sewer, said land
being Part of Lot 3, Concession 2 EYS, City of Toronto (North York Community Council
Area), designated as Parts 1 to 10 on a Draft Plan of Survey prepared by KRCMAR
Surveyors Ltd., under their Job No. 04-063, Drawing 04-065RP03, dated October 22, 2013;
THAT consideration be the nominal sum of$2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs to
be paid by the City of Toronto;
THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from injuries,
damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the
granting of this easement or the carrying out of any construction;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES.#A214/13 - CITY OF TORONTO
Request for a Permanent Easement for a New Watermain, in the City of
Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River
Watershed, CFN 34348. Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to
provide a permanent easement for a new watermain located west of
Rockcliffe Boulevard and south of Alliance Avenue, in the City of Toronto
(Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River watershed.
(Executive Res.#8150/13)
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: David Barrow
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request
from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for a new watermain located
west of Rockcliffe Boulevard and south of Alliance Avenue in the City of Toronto
(Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River watershed;
AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in
Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Toronto in
this instance;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of
0.09 hectares (0.22 acres), more or less, be granted to the City of Toronto for a new
watermain, said land being Part of Lots 37 and 38, Concession 3 FTB, City of Toronto
(Etobicoke York Community Council Area), designated as Parts 1 through 6 on Plan
66R-21397;
486
THAT consideration be the nominal sum of$2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs to
be paid by the City of Toronto;
THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from injuries,
damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the
granting of this easement or the carrying out of any construction;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES.#A215/13 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: David Barrow
THAT Section II items EX8.1 and EX8.2, contained in Executive Committee Minutes
#10/13, held on December 13, 2013, be received.
CARRIED
Section II Items EX8.1 and EX8.2
ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD HEARING
(Executive Res.#8151/13)
STORMWATER RETROFIT FUNDING
(Executive Res.#8152/13)
RES.#A216/13 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT Section II item EX8.3 - Boyd Conservation Area - Parking Lot Construction,
contained in Executive Committee Minutes #10/13, held on December 13, 2013, be
received.
CARRIED
487
ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED
RES.#A217/13 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.100, inclusive,
contained in Executive Committee Minutes #10/13, held on December 13, 2013, be
received.
CARRIED
NEW BUSINESS
RES.#A218/13 - DECEMBER 2013 ICE STORM
Moved by: Mujeeb Khan
Seconded by: Chris Fonseca
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff report on the December 2013 ice
storm damages at Authority Meeting #11/13, scheduled to be held on January 31, 2013.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:54 a.m., on Friday, January 10, 2014.
Maria Augimeri Brian Denney
Vice Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/ks
488
0 Lqk
CToronto and Region
onserva ion
Authority
MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY #11/13
January 31, 2014
The Authority Meeting #11/13, was held in Weston Room B, Black Creek Pioneer Village,
on Friday, January 31, 2014. The Vice Chair Maria Augimeri, called the meeting to order
at 9:37 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri
Vice Chair
Ben Cachola
Member
Raymond Cho
Member
Ronald Chopowick
Member
Vincent Crisanti
Member
Glenn De Baeremaeker
Member
Michael Di Biase
Member
Chris Fonseca
Member
Jack Heath
Member
Colleen Jordan
Member
Mujeeb Khan
Member
Gloria Lindsay Luby
Member
Glenn Mason
Member
Mike Mattos
Member
Linda Pabst
Member
John Parker
Member
Anthony Perruzza
Member
Dave Ryan
Member
Deb Schulte
Member
Cynthia Thorburn
Member
Jim Tovey
Member
Richard Whitehead
Member
ABSENT
Paul Ainslie
Member
David Barrow
Member
Bob Callahan
Member
Peter Milczyn
Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Chair
John Sprovieri
Member
•
RES. #A219 /13 -
Moved by:
Seconded by:
MINUTES
Michael Di Biase
Chris Fonseca
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #10/13, held on January 10, 2013, be approved.
CARRIED
PRESENTATIONS
(a) A presentation by Scott Fortnum, Executive Director, The Living City Foundation, in
regard to The Living City Foundation.
(b) A presentation by Darryl Gray, Senior Manager, Education, TRCA, and Ron Halliday,
Abilities Centre, in regard to Claremont Field Centre Accessibility Upgrades Capital
Campaign.
RES. #A220 /13 -
Moved by:
Seconded by:
PRESENTATIONS
Dave Ryan
Colleen Jordan
THAT staff report back on the recommendations outlined in above -noted presentation (a).
CARRIED
RES. #A221 /13 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by: Cynthia Thorburn
Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
THAT above -noted presentation (b) be received.
CARRIED
CORRESPONDENCE
(a) A letter dated January 29, 2014 from Liz White, Animal Alliance Environment Voters
Party of Canada and Barry MacKay, Born Free and Ainslie Willock, Canadians for Snow
Geese, in regard to Item AUTH7.3, Double- crested Cormorants.
RES. #A222 /13 - CORRESPONDENCE
Moved by: Mujeb Khan
Seconded by: Ben Cachola
THAT above -noted correspondence (a) be received.
CARRIED
CORRESPONDENCE (A)
ANIMAL
ALLIANCE
OFCANADA
r►!"e y
PC TA
Environmi
Party of
221 Broadview Ave,, Suite xol,
Toronto, Ontario
M4M 2Gg
Phone;
(416) 462 -9541
Facsinsile:
(416) 462 -9647
E -mail:
coat aft@ a niinalalli a nce m
contact @ene� ronincntvoters.org
Webster
iviviv.aii in►elalliance,ca
Zviv►v.ein4ton nientvoters.org
TO: Chair and Members,
Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority
FROM: Liz Mite, Animal
Alliance/Environment Voters
Barry MacKay, Canadian
Representative, Born Free USA
Ainslie Willock, Canadian
Representative, Canadians for
Snow Geese
SUBJECT: Double- Crested Cormorants — 2013
Management Summary and 2014
Management Strategy
DANE: January 29, 2014
Chairperson and Members of the Toronto and Legion
Conservation Authority,
Item RUTH 7.3
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the 2015
Management Stunmaiy and 2014 Management Summary.
Recommendation-.
We ask the Authority to adopt all five mcommendations
contained in Item AUTH7.3.
Baftround:
The work done by TRCA staff regarding the protection and
management of colonial waterbirds and specifically cortnorairts
at Tammy Thon -ipson Park is outstanding.
The TRCA management programme stands in sham contrast to
management approaches in other jurisdictions that resort to
yearly culling as a way of attempting to get rid of some of the
bards.
491
We monitored the cull on High Bluff Island in Lake Ontario frO1I1 2004 to 2006
here over 1o,000 cormorants were killed and the cull on Middle Island in Lahe
Erie where Nvell over 12,og?- cormorants have been billed so far. The culls were eery
costly and did not achieve the stated goals.
The transformation of a largely tree nesting colony to a majority of ground nesters
speaks to a progressive mmiagement prograrnrne that attempts to maintain the
colony while protecting parts of the tree canopy. In 2005,15% of the cormorant
colony nested on the ground, In 2013, the nuinber increased to 58 %,
Compare the cormorant managernent programme on Middle Ishind to the approach
of the TR A at TTP. The TRCA staff recognized that an iner'edible natural a %,ent was
unfolding at TTP — n very large waterbird colony which includes the largest
cormorant colony on the Great Lakes,
Instead of culling and lasing other invasive methods, staff have designed a
progressive management strategy ivhicb involves public education, cormorant
conservation zones, an enhanced ground nesting strategy, monitoring and research
and some pre - nesting and past - breeding detergents,
To the staff' and the Authority, thank you for your progressive and forward thinking,
approach to the cormorant colony at TTP and for understanding that they are part
of the biological diversity of the park.
Sincerely,
Liz White (for Ainslie' illock) Barry MacKay
492
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #A223 /13 - DOWNTOWN BRAMPTON SPECIAL POLICY AREA
COMPREHENSIVE POLICY AND BOUNDARY UPDATE
The City of Brampton is updating the policies and boundary of the
Downtown Brampton Special Policy Area based upon a Comprehensive
Flood Risk and Management Analysis undertaken in accordance with
provincial guidelines. The Authority is requested to endorse the
proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By -law Amendment that
will implement the updated Special Policy Area policies and boundary.
Moved by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
Seconded by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
WHEREAS the City of Brampton, in collaboration with Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA), has prepared a Comprehensive Flood Risk and Management Analysis
for the Downtown Brampton Special Policy Area (SPA), based upon the 2012 Etobicoke
Creek hydrology, hydraulic modelling and flood line mapping, in accordance with
provincial guidelines for amending the policies and boundaries of existing SPAs;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the request by the City of Brampton to update
the boundary and policies of the Downtown Brampton Special Policy Area through an
Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By -law Amendment be supported for approval;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Brampton, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
and Ministry of Natural Resources be so advised by the CEO's Office.
AMENDMENT
RES. #A224 /13
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT the 2nd paragraph of the main motion be amended to read:
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the request by the City of Brampton to update
the boundary and policies of the Downtown Brampton Special Policy Area through an
Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By -law Amendment be supported for approval
provided final refinements of wording be completed by the City of Brampton and the
Province, to the satisfaction of the TRCA;
THE AMENDMENT WAS
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS
493
CARRIED
CARRIED
THE RESULTANT MOTION READS AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS the City of Brampton, in collaboration with Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA), has prepared a Comprehensive Flood Risk and Management Analysis
for the Downtown Brampton Special Policy Area (SPA), based upon the 2012 Etobicoke
Creek hydrology, hydraulic modelling and flood line mapping, in accordance with
provincial guidelines for amending the policies and boundaries of existing SPAs;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the request by the City of Brampton to update
the boundary and policies of the Downtown Brampton Special Policy Area through an
Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By -law Amendment be supported for approval
provided final refinements of wording be completed by the City of Brampton and the
Province, to the satisfaction of the TRCA;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Brampton, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
and Ministry of Natural Resources be so advised by the CEO's Office.
BACKGROUND
Brampton's historic downtown core is a defining element of the City structure, the overall
planning framework for the City in the Official Plan. It forms a part of the Central Area for the
City of Brampton, the focus of major institutional, residential, commercial, cultural and
recreation activity in the'heart' of the City of Brampton. The ongoing rehabilitation and
revitalization of the historic downtown core plays an essential role in realizing this vision.
A portion of the Central Area is located within the flood plain of the Etobicoke Creek. To allow
for the continued viability of the historic downtown core and address the significant social and
economic hardships that would result from strict adherence to provincial one zone flood plain
management policies, the Province approved this area as a Special Policy Area in 1986
(Attachment 1). Since that time, the City has experienced significant growth and development
pressures and received a number of applications for development within the SPA.
In 2005, City Council adopted a Central Area Vision to accommodate significant growth in a
vibrant and healthy downtown with a strong urban character. Around the same time, there was
emerging interest from landowners and developers in downtown Brampton to intensify the
residential land uses more in character with the downtown cores of urban centres. In response
to the applications, the Province requested that a comprehensive analysis and amendment to
the SPA be undertaken to address all of the growth across the SPA. The recommendations of
this report pertain to that comprehensive analysis, the outcome of which is to provide clarity
within the policy framework and clearly establish the location, nature and extent of development
that will enable appropriate revitalization and redevelopment of the historic downtown to ensure
its long term heath and vitality.
i e i
Provincial Flood Plain Planning Policy Framework
Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), 2005 establishes the policy framework for
managing natural hazards, including flooding hazards. In accordance with provincial
standards, flooding hazards may be managed through a One Zone Concept, a Two Zone
Concept or a Special Policy Area approach. In general, the One Zone Concept is the primary
provincial approach to managing flood risk through the planning process, which essentially
requires that no new development be permitted within the flood plain. In exceptional
circumstances, a Two Zone Concept or an SPA approach may be considered.
A "Special Policy Area" designation is a planning mechanism provided by the Province to
recognize the unique circumstances of historic communities that existed within flood vulnerable
areas prior to the implementation of a provincial flood hazard planning policy and where it has
been demonstrated that the application of the other flood plain management approaches (One
Zone or Two Zone) would not allow for the continued social and economic viability and
revitalization of these areas. New SPAs and any amendments to their policies and boundaries
to existing SPAs must be approved by both the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
(MMAH) and the Minister of Natural Resources (MNR) because they reflect a relaxation of
natural hazard policies for flood - related events, where this is deemed appropriate. As stated in
the PPS, SPAs are not intended to allow for new or intensified development, if a community has
feasible opportunities for development outside the flood plain.
The proposal for a new SPA or modifications to the boundaries or policies of an existing
provincially approved SPA may only be initiated by lower -tier or single -tier municipalities as the
proponent. Such proposals must be undertaken in accordance with the Ministry of Natural
Resources Technical Guide, Appendix 5 - River and Stream Systems: Flooding Hazard Limit, "
Procedures for Approval of New Special Policy Areas (SPAs) and Modifications to Existing SPAs
Under the Provincial Policy Statement, 2005 (PPS, 2005), Policy 3.1.3 - Natural Hazards- Special
Policy Area, dated January 2009 ". The policies and boundaries of an SPA are determined
through a consultative process between the municipality, TRCA, MNR and MMAH, and
implemented through amendments to a municipality's Official Plan and Zoning By -law. These
site specific SPA policies are used by TRCA staff to inform and guide TRCA's regulatory
permitting responsibilities under Section 28(1) of the Conservation Authorities Act.
Existing Downtown Brampton Special Policy Area
The SPA for the City of Brampton's historic core was approved by the Province in 1986 in
conjunction with the Brampton Secondary Plan (OP84 -058). The SPA designation was
supported by TRCA and the boundary of the SPA was reflective of the limit of the flood plain
known at that time. The policies for the SPA were incorporated into the Downtown Brampton
Secondary Plan, which replaced the Brampton Central Secondary Plan in 1998. The SPA
policies were set out as `Special Policy Area 3' in the Secondary Plan and include the technical
requirements for development within the SPA
Comprehensive Flood Risk and Management Analysis:
Since 1986, no changes have been made to the SPA. Subsequent to the receipt of a number
of development applications in the historic core beginning in 2004, the Province (MMAH)
requested that a comprehensive analysis and update to the SPA be undertaken to address all
of the growth across the SPA. In addition, downtown Brampton was identified as an Urban
Growth Centre as part of the provincial requirements to conform to the Places to Grow Act. A
small but important area of the Urban Growth Centre is affected by the SPA.
495
The City of Brampton, in collaboration with TRCA, developed a submission package in
accordance with the MNR 2009 technical guidelines for amending the policies and boundaries
of existing SPAs. The City made its submission to the Province in August of 2011 and held an
initial public meeting with respect to the amendment documents in November 2011.
Consultation between the City, TRCA, MMAH and MNR regarding the initial submission
occurred throughout 2012 and early 2013. In March of 2013, the City provided an addendum
submission to the Province that included updated hydrology, hydraulic and floodline data from
TRCA, additional risk management technical assessment and clarity on the distribution of
growth. The Province provided a detailed response on the updated submission in June of 2013
and the City has been working closely with MMAH, MNR and TRCA to address these
comments. City staff reported on their proposed response to the provincial comments to City
Council and Planning, Design and Development Committee meetings in August and
September of 2013. The proposed Official Plan Amendment (OPA) and associated Zoning
By -law Amendment (ZBA) were revised and presented at a further public meeting in November
2013. The City, MMAH, MNR and TRCA met in November and have been engaged in ongoing
consultation since then in an effort to advance through the final stages of the SPA update and
approval process.
The provincial approval procedures require an endorsement of the proposed Official Plan
Amendment and Zoning By -law Amendment by City Council as part of the City's final
submission package to the Province. A similar endorsement on the technical material and the
proposed OPA and ZBA from TRCA's board is also required. A report to the City's Planning,
Design and Development Committee was received on January 13, 2014, with a
recommendation for endorsement of the proposed OPA /ZBA by Council. The details of the
City's report, including the proposed OPA /ZBA, can be found at the following link:
http: / /www. bram pton. ca /EN/ City -Hal I/ meetings- agendas /PDD %20Com m ittee %20201 0/201 401 1
3pdd_G1.pdf. This report will be considered by City Council on January 29, 2014.
The following is a summary of the key components of the Comprehensive Flood Risk and
Management Analysis.
Flood Risk within the Downtown Brampton SPA
A fundamental element of the Comprehensive Flood Risk and Management Analysis was to
update the boundaries of the SPA based upon current flood plain mapping. The analyses of
flood risk are based on the technical updates for the Etobicoke Creek listed below. These
studies were finalized, peer reviewed and approved by Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority in 2012. The methodology for preparing hydrologic /hydraulic models and the
specifications for regulatory mapping are prescribed by the Ministry of Natural Resources
(Technical Guide - River and Stream Systems: Flooding Hazard Limit, 2002).
Technical Studies for Etobicoke Creek:
• Etobicoke Creek Hydrology Study, MMM 2012
• Etobicoke Creek Hydraulic Model, Greck 2012
• Etobicoke Creek Floodline Mapping, Greck 2012
Although the Brampton by -pass channel was originally sized to only convey the 100 year storm,
current modelling shows that the channel can actually pass flows up to and including the 1:350
year storm. However, a significant portion of flow will still leave the by -pass channel and find a
conveyance route through the historic river valley during a Regulatory (Hurricane Hazel) Flood
event; almost an equal amount of water will be conveyed through the historic river valley as will
be conveyed down the by -pass channel. The 'historic' valley is actually the downtown core,
(Main Street /Four Corners Business Area), an area that includes such uses as: residential,
commercial and institutional buildings, an extensive road network, a CNR line with two roadway
openings at Main and Union Street, and open space systems at Rosalea Park and Gage Park.
Modelling also shows that flood depths during a Regulatory Flood will range from 0 to 3 m
within the SPA, with the areas of greatest depth just upstream of the CNR tracks and along the
western boundary of the SPA north of Queen Street. The majority of the SPA area will
experience 1 to 2 m depth of flooding near the lowest part of the historic river valley (through
the centre of the historic valley), while shallow areas will exist at the outer boundaries.
The 2012 flood risk information (flood depths and velocities and floodline mapping) resulted in
the following positive impacts:
• The SPA is reduced in size by approximately 5 hectares based upon the new
Regulatory floodline mapping.
• There is an overall reduction in the depth of flooding within the SPA. Previous hydraulic
models,(based on 2007 hydrology), showed much greater depths of flooding (up to the
4 to 5 m range).
• The existing SPA requires new buildings or structures to be floodproofed to the
Regulatory Flood event; however, where it is not feasible to floodproof to the Regulatory
Flood event, the minimum level of protection is the 1:350 year storm event. Current
modelling shows that the by -pass channel can pass flows up to and including the 1:350
year storm. This means that the downtown core is not affected by flooding from the
Etobicoke Creek in all events up to and including the 1:350 year storm event and that
the minimum floodproofing standard of the SPA policies can be met for all new
development and redevelopment within the SPA.
The detailed characterization of the floodplain based upon the 2012 information formed a
critical part of the March 2013 addendum submission package to the Province, as the basis for
the determination of risk to life and property arising from the future proposed land use within
the SPA.
Land Use Planning - Growth Distribution
The Province required additional supporting rationale for the projected growth in the
SPA given that SPAs are not intended for intensification if there are feasible opportunities
outside the floodplain. The Comprehensive Flood Risk and Management Analysis does not
increase intensification above what is already permitted within the existing Downtown Brampton
Secondary Plan; it introduces policies that refine the distribution of growth strategically to
reduce risk and fulfill the City's vision for residential and job growth contributing to a vibrant
downtown. The draft Official Plan Amendment for the proposed SPA update establishes four
sub -areas to reflect the differing policy and development approach within the SPA, based upon
the risk management assessment and strategy. The following is a summary:
497
• a strategic redistribution of future residential growth along the edge of the floodplain,
(i.e. outer edge of the SPA), where safe ingress /egress to flood -free lands is available;
maximum massing, gross floor area and residential units have been established in order
to provide certainty and manage risk;
• no new residential units within the historic commercial core, where there is limited
opportunity to gain access to flood free lands; however, maintains opportunities for
revitalization that protects the historic fabric with a focus on heritage, culture, arts and
entertainment;
• restriction on new residential uses in established neighbourhoods outside of the historic
commercial core but still within the flood plain; and
• a restriction on new sensitive uses throughout the entire SPA, in accordance with the
Provincial Policy Statement, including those uses related to the care of children, the
elderly and persons with disabilities; essential emergency services; and, those uses
associated with the handling or storage of hazardous substances.
Emergency Management
Under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, municipalities have the primary
responsibility and authority for response to flooding and flood emergencies and the welfare of
residents. The City of Brampton and TRCA work closely together to ensure that the most
current flood risk information is shared to facilitate the coordination of flood forecasting and
emergency planning. TRCA operates a Flood Forecasting and Warning System that monitors
watershed and weather conditions daily in order to issue timely warning of anticipated or actual
flood conditions. Conditions during a flood event are closely monitored by TRCA and
communicated to the municipality.
The Brampton Emergency Measures Office (BEMO) has developed a "Standard Operating
Procedure on Downtown Brampton Flood Response Plan "' based on the type, location and
amount of growth in the proposed Official Plan Amendment for the updated SPA. This plan
outlines the procedures for monitoring and assessment of conditions that could lead to a flood
situation in the Downtown Core notification and communication, evacuation and sheltering,
response and recovery and identifies the major roles and responsibilities for City of Brampton
and Region of Peel services.
The requirement for flood -free access for the focus areas of new residential development
provides an enhancement for emergency response and life safety. All new development,
(including those containing non - residential uses), will be required to prepare a Building Safety
Plan consistent with the City's Emergency Management Plan. Where new development
includes a plan of condominium, appropriate provision to execute the operational elements and
protocols must be included in the applicable Condominium Act Declaration. The City will
impose a condition on new development applications requiring the developer to notify
prospective building owners /tenants of the Building Safety Plan and emergency notification and
protocol. These clauses shall also be included on any Community Information Map required
for development by the City.
•
Proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By -law Amendment:
The City of Brampton has prepared a proposed OPA that reflects and implements the land use
and risk management approach as set out in the Comprehensive Flood Risk Management
Analysis. It supports the ongoing revitalization of the downtown by realizing strategic
development opportunities while managing and reducing risk with respect to flooding. The OPA
establishes four sub -areas to reflect the differing policy approach and development potential
within the SPA. These sub -areas implement the residential growth distribution (with focus on
edge areas) component of the risk management strategy. The OPA establishes limits for
residential and non - residential development, sets out the technical requirements for
development with respect to flood - proofing and flood risk management and establishes the
approval process for new development.
The proposed ZBA further implements the risk management approach and the proposed SPA
policies of the OPA by adding floodplain regulations for the SPA to the City's Comprehensive
Zoning By -law. These regulations establish limits for residential and non - residential
development, flood - proofing requirements and restrictions on new sensitive land uses.
The Province provided comments on the proposed OPA and ZBA in letter dated January 7,
2014. Staff from the City, MMAH, MNR and TRCA held a teleconference call on January 8,
2014 to discuss these comments. The City has provided revised versions of the OPA (dated
January 9, 2014) and ZBA (January 10, 2014) as a result of these discussions. It is staff's
understanding that at the writing of this report that the Province is generally satisfied with the
revised documents, with perhaps the exception of a specific policy which may be subject to
further discussion and amendments. TRCA is satisfied that the revised draft OPA and Zoning
By -law captures TRCA planning and regulatory interests, roles and responsibilities for
development within the SPA. Staff recommends that the revised versions of the OPA and ZBA
be supported.
Next Steps in the SPA Process
The following is a summary of the concluding steps in the process to update the Downtown
Brampton SPA boundary and policies, in accordance with the provincial guidelines:
• City Council approval in principle of the proposed OPA /ZBA (January 29, 2014).
• TRCA resolution of endorsement of the technical information and proposed OPA/ZBA.
• Council /TRCA resolutions forwarded to MMAH /MNR.
• City submission of final documentation to MMAH (February).
• MMAH /MNR provide recommendation to Ministers.
• Ministers of MMAH and MNR make a decision on the amendments.
• City Council adopts OPA (with revisions if required) and enacts ZBA (with revisions if
needed), 20 -day appeal period.
• OPA /ZBA in force if no appeal.
Flood Mitigation for the Long Term
It is important to note that in addition to the comprehensive update the Downtown Brampton
Special Policy Area, that the City has initiated a process to investigate flood mitigation
opportunities for the long term. With a view to fully realize the long term development potential
of the lands in the SPA, the City's commitment to identify a long -term solution to eliminate the
flood susceptible lands is acknowledged in the background preamble of the proposed OPA.
Following direction from Council, City of Brampton and TRCA staff initiated a joint study
process to address the natural hazard issues and urban form in the downtown core. Two
concurrent studies were initiated:
(i) a TRCA lead study to assess the feasibility of eliminating the flooding in the City's
downtown from the Regulatory Flood event (funded by Peel Region under the Peel
Flood Remediation program), and
(ii) a City -led study to examine urban design considerations and land use options. The joint
study committee (consisting of both project teams) has been a successful collaboration
between the City and TRCA and has allowed for the sharing of data, alignment of study
objectives and the integration of technical /design /land use elements.
Downtown Brampton Flood Protection Feasibility Study (AMEC)
In September 2012, TRCA awarded AMEC Environment and Infrastructure (AMEC) the
"Downtown Brampton Flood Protection Feasibility Study ", a technical feasibility study to
identify mitigation options to eliminate or reduce the risks due to flooding on the main branch of
the Etobicoke Creek through the SPA. The study is focusing on the mitigation
of flood risk during the Regulatory Flood (Hurricane Hazel storm), or to the greatest level
practical.
The results of the feasibility study will:
(1) identify potential flood mitigation options for the Regulatory Flood event (both "permanent"
and "non- permanent" as defined by the Ministry of Natural Resources), and
(2) provide a recommendation as to whether or not an Environmental Assessment should be
undertaken to advance the flood protection plans toward implementation.
Urban Design and Land Use Study (The Planning Partnership)
This study will analyze and refine the recommendations from the AMEC study for flood
mitigation. Based on these technical conclusions, the consultant will develop design
options that integrate Etobicoke Creek and the trail system, identified open space needs, and
the existing character and vision for downtown Brampton.
Ultimately, the land use considerations, urban design best practices, and existing policy at
municipal, regional and provincial levels will inform the vision for flood mitigation in
Downtown Brampton. This study area primarily encompasses the area of interface between
Etobicoke Creek and the Downtown.
TRCA staff will be reporting back to the Authority later this year on the progress and outcomes
of these studies.
500
CONCLUSION
The City of Brampton, in collaboration with TRCA, has prepared a Comprehensive Flood Risk
and Management Analysis for the Downtown Brampton Special Policy Area (SPA), in
accordance with provincial guidelines for amending the policies and boundaries of existing
SPAs. This flood risk analysis in this submission is based upon TRCA's 2012 hydrology and
hydraulic modelling and floodline mapping for the Etobicoke Creek. The proposed OPA and
ZBA sets out a policy framework that will enable the revitalization and redevelopment of the
historic downtown to ensure its long term health and vitality while achieving an overall reduction
of flood risk through strategic planning of new development and redevelopment. The
development of the submission package and proposed OPA and ZBA have been subject to
extensive discussions with MMAH and MNR. On this basis, TRCA staff recommends that the
Authority support the proposed OPA and ZBA to update the policies and boundaries of the
Downtown Brampton Special Policy Area, in order to advance to the next steps of the Provincial
approval process.
Report prepared by: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281
Emails: Inelson @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281
Emails: Inelson @trca.on.ca
Date: January 21, 2014
Attachments: 1
501
Attachment 1
■1ll1���' 11
NJ
Jill
Anil
1110
Downtown �� 11111111111 '.
{
ry" 1 e 1
' Brampton
Special Policy s
Area Amendment
502
RES. #A225/13 - EROSION MANAGEMENT FOR THE JULY 8TH SEVERE WEATHER
EVENT - UPDATE
Staff update on the management of erosion and slope instability hazards
resulting from the severe weather event on July 8th, 2013.
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: Linda Pabst
WHEREAS staff reported on the management of erosion and slope stability hazards
related to the July 8, 2013 severe weather event at Authority #6/13 on July 26, 2013;
AND WHEREAS TRCA staff was authorized under Resolution #A126/13 to undertake
geotechnical investigations and undertake interim erosion control and /or slope
stabilization works at critical and high priority sites through the reallocation of funds from
the Erosion Infrastructure Major Maintenance, Valley and Shoreline Monitoring and Minor
Maintenance and other erosion and hazard related funding that may be available;
AND WHEREAS staff was directed under Resolution #A126/13 to report to the City
Manager at the City of Toronto and the Chief Administrative Officer at the Region of Peel
on the July 8, 2013 severe weather event related to physical and financial impacts of river
and valley erosion, and to request the City of Toronto and Region of Peel for additional
funds in 2013 -2014 to undertake remedial design and works for critical and high priority
sites;
AND WHEREAS staff was authorized under Resolution #A126/13 to develop a formal
communication strategy with City of Toronto staff and local Councillors to disseminate
consistent messaging to affected constituents;
AND WHEREAS staff was requested under Resolution #A126/13 to provide a follow up
report on the status of enhanced funding requests and progress of work to the Authority
in January 2014;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT staff be directed to continue with ongoing
geotechnical investigations to assess risk and rank priority erosion hazard sites for future
stabilization works using additional funding identified in TRCA's 2014 - 2023 capital
budgets;
THAT staff be authorized to commence with stabilization works on a priority basis
beginning in 2014 as outlined in the workplan provided herein;
THAT staff report back on options to deal with erosion issues on the Granger Greenway;
AND FURTHER THAT a copy of this report be provided to the cities of Toronto and
Mississauga, and Region of Peel.
CARRIED
503
BACKGROUND
On July 8, 2013 an intense downpour of precipitation rolled through the Toronto area, causing
wide - spread flooding, surcharges of water infrastructure, and significant damage to the river
and valley systems including extensive damage to park trails and pedestrian bridges,
numerous debris jams, and an unprecedented number of slope failures on hundreds of private
properties that border these natural areas.
On July 26, 2013 staff brought a report to Authority Meeting #6/13 providing an overview of the
information collected to date with recommendations for further action. At that time, 141
properties had been inspected, six of which were initially flagged as critical (three were later
downgraded to high priority following third -party reviews), 20 were flagged as high priority, 33
were flagged as medium priority, 66 as low priority and 16 sites with a priority of "none ", the
latter being primarily recently completed TRCA erosion control sites where no appreciable
damage was observed following the storm event, or where the damage was not related to river
flooding or land erosion (e.g., basement flooding). At that time, preliminary damage estimates
were in the order of $28 million.
th
As of January 20, 2014 staff has inspected 482 sites reportedly damaged during the July 8
storm event through its long- standing Erosion Management Program that is funded by regional
partners at the City of Toronto, and regions of Peel, York and Durham.
Table 1 summarizes the properties inspected by TRCA to date by region, with the preliminary
estimated cost of the damages observed. It is noted that the estimated cost of repairs apply
only to TRCA property or structures and private property, recognizing that TRCA's municipal
partners are reporting on the damage to their respective properties and infrastructure
separately (i.e. to avoid double- counting). All costs estimated by region are very preliminary
with conservative contingencies applied, and as such are subject to revision as more
information becomes available.
Table 1. Summary of inspections by Regional Municipality with preliminary estimate of
damages
Region
No. Sites
Inspected
Estimated
Cost of
Repairs
City of Toronto
433
$36M
Peel Region
41
$1.2M
York Region
7
$60K
Durham Region
1
none
TOTALS
482
$37.26M
Of the sites 482 sites inspected, 90% are located in the City of Toronto, 8% are located in the
City of Mississauga and 2% are located in Brampton, Markham, Richmond Hill, Vaughan and
Pickering combined.
In addition to the initial inspections completed, staff has subsequently managed a number of
third party investigations and carried out other actions using reallocated 2013 erosion capital
funds from the City of Toronto and Region of Peel. A summary of all undertakings completed to
January 20, 2014 is summarized in Table 2 (Attachment 1).
504
In addition to the specific initiatives listed in Table 2, the following summarizes the actions taken
by staff as directed under Resolution #A126/13 at Authority Meeting #6/13, held on July 26,
2013:
a) THAT staff be directed to report to the City Manager at the City of Toronto and the Chief
Administrative Officer at the Region of Peel on the July 8, 2013 severe weather event
related to physical and financial impacts of river and valley erosion, and to request the
City of Toronto and Region of Peel for additional funds in 2013 -2014 to undertake
remedial design and works for critical and high priority sites;
(i) The storm damage inventory with preliminary estimates of sites located in the
City of Toronto was provided to the City Manager on August 9th and October 11th
2013; a third update is scheduled to be provided to the City Manager in early
February 2014 pending the receipt of the results of the detailed geotechnical
investigations currently being completed (Action #4, Table 2).
(ii) The storm damage inventory for sites located in Peel Region are scheduled to be
provided to the Chief Administrative Officer the first week of February 2014, as
t.,
inspections of select areas following the July 8 event were completed with no
reports of damage to TRCA structures or property or private property that were
anticipated to require additional funds in 2014 -2023 to address (i.e., the existing
budgets for erosion management in Peel Region were determined to be
sufficient at present).
b) THAT staff be directed to request long -term enhanced funding commencing in 2014 to
implement stabilization for critical and high priority sites and initiate valley
segment -based planning in cooperation with City of Toronto staff to proactively identify
and address erosion and slope instability hazards and that the preliminary estimates
submitted to Toronto in May 2013 for 2014 -2023 be amended as required
(i) Over the summer and fall of 2013 staff worked closely with City staff in Finance
and Toronto Water to develop a request for long -term enhanced funding
commencing in 2014 to implement stabilization works for priority sites and
initiate valley- segment based planning to work more proactively in the
identification and remediation of erosion and slope stability hazards. It is noted
th
that prior to the July 8 event, TRCA had already submitted its preliminary
budget for enhanced funding to address additional flood /erosion remediation
and maintenance pressures, which previously requested $2M annually in 2014
and $2M in 2015. Attachment 2 provides the enhanced funding request prior to
th
and following the July 8 event, showing the adjusted priorities and associated
estimated costs.
505
(ii) As shown in Attachment 2, an additional $5M has been requested in 2014 and
2015 (totaling $7M annually), and the pre -storm funding level of $2M has been
th
reinstated beyond 2015 to 2023 to address both July 8 storm damage and
pre- existing pressures over the 10 -year forecast. TRCA staff expect that the extra
$5M from the City of Toronto will be approved as part of the final budget
approval by Council. Of note in the adjusted enhanced funding request for
2014 -2023 is the additional funding for flood control channel maintenance,
where aging channels require ongoing structural repairs and /or sediment and
vegetation removals to restore capacity that is critical during storm events; and
the Erosion Risk Mitigation Strategy (2016 -2017) - a planning and engineering
exercise to proactively identify additional existing properties that pre -date
modern development setbacks which may be particularly vulnerable to
significant erosion or slope instability during severe weather events, such as was
th
observed at several older neighbourhoods in Toronto during the July 8 event.
(iii) Numerous meetings have been convened between TRCA and the City of
Toronto to develop a coordinated, prioritized strategy for erosion hazard
mitigation, which are expected to continue on an ongoing basis as priorities for
future years are refined. As part of these coordinated meetings City and TRCA
staff have compared the respective priorities for 2014 and have identified a small
number of sites of mutual concern over the short -term, however given that
Toronto Water is faced with numerous emergency situations regarding exposed
sanitary infrastructure that must be dealt with immediately, and TRCA remains
the agency coordinating the assessment and potential remediation of several
hundred private properties impacted by storm damage, some of which are
deemed at imminent risk, the top priorities for each group are generally
independent of one another for 2014. Longer term, however, it is recognized that
there are many sites of concern to both Toronto Water and TRCA insofar as
where bed and bank erosion affecting existing development is concerned. These
future opportunities bode well for developing a strong coordinated approach to
more proactive hazard mitigation.
c) THAT staff be authorized to develop a formal communication strategy with City of Toronto
staff and local Councillors to disseminate consistent messaging to affected constituents
th
In the initial days following the July 8 storm, it was determined that all first reports of erosion
damage be referred to TRCA for preliminary inspection and inventory, as it was recognized that
TRCA has considerable experience and the necessary tools and protocols in place to assess
and track erosion and slope instability hazards through its existing Erosion Management
Program. Staff quickly realized the number of people affected was significant, and revamped
the Erosion Management Program webpage
http: / /www.trca.on.ca /protect /erosion- management/ to include updates on TRCA's post -storm
erosion management efforts, and provided links to the appropriate City staff and local
Councillors.
506
Later, to further promote the efficient dissemination of consistent messaging to affected
constituents, the Storm Damage Information Portal http : / /trca.on.ca /stormdamageinfo was
developed in -house to allow residents to register with TRCA to receive updated information
regarding their properties, which are categorized by the level of assessment currently in
progress. The portal also includes information on the Mimico Creek Low Flow Channel
Maintenance work, allowing staff to communicate with an entire community of affected
th
residents. All local Councillors with properties included in the July 8 storm damage inventory
were notified of the storm damage portal and encouraged to register to keep abreast of new
information.
In addition to providing links to webpages and information sites, each Councillor has also
received a minimum of three general updates on the storm damage sites in their respective
th
Wards since July 8 , with additional updates and other information provided as requested by
the Councillor.
RATIONALE
In light of TRCA's specialized experience in the assessment and remediation of erosion and
slope instability through its Erosion Management Program, staff request to proceed with the
following projects listed in Table 3 (Attachment 3) using 2014 -2015 enhanced funding from the
City of Toronto and 2014 -2015 core erosion management funding from the Region of Peel,
subject to all necessary approvals and confirmation of available funding.
With respect to the estimated costs provided in Table 3, as a considerable amount of work is
required before costs can be refined, the projects listed represent the top priority projects to be
given first consideration with the available funding. As costs are refined, projects listed may be
recommended to be accelerated or deferred to ensure that all work undertaken is completed
within the funding that is available. It is also noted that pending the results of the detailed
geotechnical investigations currently in progress and recommended below, in -year
adjustments may be required to ensure the most hazardous sites are addressed first.
th
Given the extent of erosion damage sustained in the City of Toronto during the July 8 event
and the increase in financial pressure that this damage has created for the City, to ensure that
all funds for repairs are applied appropriately and in a coordinated fashion that is as efficient as
possible, all Toronto projects recommended in Table 3 are subject to individual review by the
City of Toronto before staff is to proceed with any work. In accordance with this approach, the
projects listed in Table 3 are subject to revision.
Pending the outcome of these reviews and any new information that is received from the
detailed investigations currently in progress, staff will provide an update at a future Authority
meeting detailing any changes to the priority list for 2014 -2015.
507
FINANCIAL DETAILS
th
As previously stated, damage resulting from the July 8 2013 storm to TRCA property and
private properties inspected is currently estimated at $37.26M. Total expenditures for
post -storm erosion management efforts are estimated at $470K for 2013. The tentative budget
for storm - related studies and repairs for 2014 -2015 is $14M in the City of Toronto, using
special /enhanced funding, and $1.5M in the Region of Peel, using core erosion management
funding. All costs estimated were done coarsely using past similar works for reference and
order of magnitude estimates from third -party engineering firms retained to complete
preliminary and detailed assessments. As a substantial amount of work needs to be completed
before detailed cost estimates can be prepared, a 50% contingency allowance has been
applied to all estimates to account for the absence of detailed information. As such, all costs
are subject to change as more information becomes available.
Report prepared by: Moranne McDonnell, 416- 392 -9725
Emails: mmcdonnell @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Moranne McDonnell, 416 - 392 -9725
Emails: mmcdonnell @trca.on.ca
Date: January 16, 2014
Attachments: 3
•
Attachment 1 - Table 2. Erosion management actions undertaken by TRCA following the July
8th severe weather event to January 20, 2014
ACTION
LOCATIONS
STATUS
RECOMMENDATIONS
COST TO
COMPLETE
ACTION
1. Preliminary damage
482 locations across
Complete
(i) Undertake third -party
assessments including
TRCA's jurisdiction
preliminary risk
inspection, reporting,
assessments to determine
155K
meetings and associated
priorities for further action
project management
(Actions #2,5)
tasks
(ii) Refer damage to municipal
infrastructure and property
to appropriate City staff
(complete)
2. Preliminary slope stability
27 properties in the City
Complete
Undertake detailed
and erosion risk
of Toronto ranked
geotechnical investigations for
19K
assessments (Phase 1)
medium -high priority or
all properties assessed (Action
higher by TRCA
#4).
inspectors
3. Emergency detailed
3 properties in the City of
Complete
Implement stabilization works
geotechnical
Toronto ranked critical
as soon as possible at all 3
56K
investigations
priority by TRCA
properties (see 2014 proposed
inspectors
workplan in Rationale section)
4. Detailed geotechnical
23 properties identified
In progress
Information received to date
investigations (Phase 1)
through Phase
(90%
confirm that several properties
137K
1 preliminary assessments
complete)
are at risk long -term if no
stabilization works are
implemented (see 2014
proposed workplan in Rationale
section)
5. Preliminary slope stability
72 properties in the City
Complete
Undertake detailed
and erosion risk
of Toronto ranked
geotechnical investigations for
48K
assessments (Phase 2)
medium -high or higher by
all properties assessed (see
TRCA inspectors
2014 proposed workplan in
Rationale section)
6. Etobicoke Creek
Continuous walk of
Complete
(i) Flag exposed sanitary
Walkthrough (Ward 3, City
Etobicoke Creek in Ward
sewer crossings (7) to Peel
5K
of Mississauga)
3
Region (complete);
(approximately 30 km)
(ii) undertake detailed
geotechnical investigations
of 14 properties (see 2014
proposed workplan in
Rationale section)
509
ACTION
LOCATIONS
STATUS
RECOMMENDATIONS
COST TO
COMPLETE
ACTION
7. Mimico Creek Erosion
Continuous walk of
Complete
(i) Prepare report detailing
Damage Assessment
Mimico Creek from
observations and
approximately Bloor
recommendations
10K
Street to The Queensway
(complete);
(approximately 9 km)
(ii) Carry out maintenance of
the low flow channel to
restore conveyance and
reduce erosion of private
property (commenced
December 2013; in progress
to mid February 2014)
(iii) Initiate a Flood and Erosion
Management Master Plan
for Lower Mimico Creek
(see 2014 proposed
workplan in Rationale
section)
8. Mimico Creek Low Flow
Redistribution of
In- stream
N/A
Channel Maintenance
in- stream materials and
maintenance
200K
removal of debris from
in progress
(2013/2014);
south of Bloor Street (at
(until
40K in 2013
Orchard) to Jeff Healey
mid - February
Park; installation of
2014;
temporary bridge in Jeff
installation of
Healey Park
temporary
bridge
complete
TOTAL COST (2013)1
470K
510
Attachment 2
e
I�Gy
O
a
3
511
0
. X
9: �0
❑
ED
. <
� -n
i
. . . r
9:
9:
s
C 4U
w
'.
0.
Cl C s N i rp U L. M
Lh rt W D.
G
- G
�
-J
K Cn W CL O
pi �1 C7 C]
G
06
,Q
QL 3`
lr� �`
7
L {i7 a
N
A
D
D
ui
j
0-
�J
4i1
M
=
L43
r�a
as N
03
_
�
�
3
^< � flJ
�- 43
❑
Ci7
�
�. a
3 E7
LF3
M.
C)
=r
3
v
7 �-
❑ �'
�'
Cl
ui
M
ro
'ED
a
In =r EL
3
Q
Qo
a
.» 4 w
m
Ln
m
..
r
o
� N
fig � p
C7
C7
C3
W
N
45
It3
'�9
Ci.
h.} CI7 N
®
L7 C
A m Js
Sy
-.1
!l
6
u7
--� N
-d
N
w
CA
Q
�. R7
%5 p
CJ
C7
p
C)
s
P3
4C7
Ci7'
6)
r- 7
N
69
h5
u
w
^ N
£�3
N
470
FV
--' 470
N
� p
Q
N
Q
Cn
4C7
� N
p
p
[7
CJ
Q
N
N
LA
L4
LA
-- Q
Q
4
47
N
M1
w
CA
U
N
s
% O
C7
p
C7
CJ
N
Co
ha7
go
hJ
N
fi3 N
C7
C7
C)
N
A3
L70
4A
W
511
Attachment 3 - Table 3. Proposed storm - related restoration projects 2014 -2015
PROJECT
PRELIMINARY DESCRIPTION OF WORK
PRELIMINARY
TENTATIVE
BUDGET
SCHEDULE
(2014 -2015)
CITY OF TORONTO PROJECTS
1. Detailed geotechnical
Detailed slope stability and erosion risk assessments
800K
Award Contract
investigations (Phase
of 72 properties in the City of Toronto identified
February 2014;
2), City of Toronto
through Phase 2 preliminary assessments, plus 60
results by
additional properties ranked medium -high or higher
mid -May 2014
by TRCA inspectors.
2. #139 Whitburn
Restoration of the low flow channel through the
1.5M
Low -flow channel
Crescent, #2 -4 Jennifer
removal of woody and other debris and redistribution
restoration winter
Court, #111 -117
of in- stream materials; toe protection; localized
2014; remaining
Whitburn Crescent, City
infrastructure protection (where required); slope
work
of Toronto
stabilization works and general ravine restoration
spring /summer
2014
3. #5 Old Yonge Street,
Slope re- grading and additional foundation
500K
Structural
City of Toronto **
reinforcement; general ravine restoration
reinforcement
winter 2014; slope
stabilization spring
2014
4424 Bennington
Slope re- grading and additional foundation
250K
Structural
Heights Drive, City of
reinforcement
reinforcement
Toronto **
winter 2014; slope
stabilization spring
2014
545 -49 Moon Valley
Remove unengineered structures; slope re- grading;
1 M
Initiate EA process
Drive, City of Toronto
limited retaining walls where re- grading not possible
winter 2014;
detailed design
2014;
implementation
TBD 2014 -2015
pending
confirmation of
available funding
645 -69 Riverhead Drive
Remove unengineered structures; slope re- grading;
1.5M
Initiate EA process
limited retaining walls where re- grading not possible
winter 2014;
detailed design
2014;
implementation
TBD 2014 -2015
pending
confirmation of
available funding
7. Lower Mimico Creek
Environmental Assessment (EA) to provide
500K
Data collection,
Erosion Management
recommendations for long -term protection against
analysis and
Master Plan
ongoing erosion from approximately Bloor Street to
consultation 2014;
The Queensway. Further consultation with Toronto
development of
Water required.
recommendations
2015
512
PROJECT
PRELIMINARY DESCRIPTION OF WORK
PRELIMINARY
TENTATIVE
BUDGET
SCHEDULE
(2014 -2015)
8. Flood Control Channel
Structural repairs and /or sediment and vegetation
2M
Commence with
Maintenance
removals to restore capacity during storm events.
maintenance of
Current priority flood control channels for 2014+ are:
Donino drop
• Donino drop structure (Yonge -York Mills
structure as soon
Channel)
as weather
• Black Creek Channel (Scarlett Rd. section;
conditions permit;
Wilson Ave. section)
remaining sections
• Sheppard Channel
after Jul 1, 2014 to
Malvern Channel
limit of available
funding annually
9483 Fishleigh Drive,
Acquisition of #1 Midland; extension of shoreline
2.7M
Land acquisition
#81 Fishleigh Drive, #1
protection below #83 -81 Fishleigh Drive
2014; shoreline
Midland Avenue
works 2015
10.Additional candidate
The following properties have been tentatively
3.25M
Commence with
projects
identified for repair in 2014 -2015 pending the
detailed design,
outcome of detailed assessments currently in
approvals and
progress or planned for 2014 (listed alphabetically):
implementation on
• 9 Alderbrook Drive
a priority basis as
• 14 Appletree Court
funding is
• 87 -101 Bankview Circle
available.
• 22 -24 Bucksburn Road
Outstanding work
• 21 -24 Disan Court
remaining beyond
• 2191 Kipling Avenue
the 2014 -2015
. 22 -32 Norfield Crescent *Note: further
preliminary
consultation /coordination with Toronto Water as it
funding allocation
relates to the Berry Creek STS protection
identified would be
• 100 North Drive
deferred to a
Northline Road (Toronto Water building)
future year using
• 19 -25 Ridgegate Crescent
enhanced
• 323 Riverview Drive
2016 -2023 funding
• 1025 Scarlett Road
from the City of
. 75 Strathavon Drive
Toronto.
• 37 -39 Topcliff Avenue
TOTAL
14M
REGION OF PEEL PROJECTS
1. Detailed geotechnical
Detailed slope stability and erosion risk assessments
100K
Award Contract
investigations (Phase
of 15 properties in Peel Region ranked medium -high
February 2014;
2)
or higher by TRCA inspectors.
results by mid -May
2014
2. #3487 -3533 Ponytrail
Slope re- grading and restoration of rear yards; toe
800K
2014 -2015 (to be
Drive, City of
protection
determined)
Mississauga
3. #1876 -1892 Steepbank
Slope re- grading and restoration of rear yards; toe
500K
2014 -2015 (to be
Crescent, City of
protection
determined)
Mississauga
TOTAL
I 1 AM
** subject to confirmation from the City of Toronto that these sites are eligible for funding under TRCAs program
513
RES. #A226 /13 - DOUBLE - CRESTED CORMORANTS
2013 Management Summary and 2014 Management Strategy. Summary
of 2013 management activities and 2014 management strategy for
Double- crested Cormorants at Tommy Thompson Park.
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
THAT staff be directed to continue to work with the Cormorant Advisory Group to assist
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) in addressing management concerns
regarding colonial waterbirds at Tommy Thompson Park (TTP);
THAT staff be directed to work with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Canadian
Wildlife Service and any other required regulatory agency to seek approval for the 2014
management strategy for colonial waterbirds at TTP;
THAT staff be directed to implement the proposed management strategy for 2014;
THAT staff be directed to continue to actively participate in local, regional and binational
committees /working groups addressing the management and protection of colonial
waterbirds;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Authority bi- annually regarding the
management of Double- crested Cormorants at Tommy Thompson Park or more frequently
should the Strategic Approach be significantly changed.
AMENDMENT
RES. #A227 /13
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
THAT the following be inserted after the main motion:
AND FURTHER THAT staff make a presentation at the March Authority meeting on the
double- crested cormorants management strategy.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
THE RESULTANT MOTION READS AS FOLLOWS:
THAT staff be directed to continue to work with the Cormorant Advisory Group to assist
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) in addressing management concerns
regarding colonial waterbirds at Tommy Thompson Park (TTP);
514
THAT staff be directed to work with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Canadian
Wildlife Service and any other required regulatory agency to seek approval for the 2014
management strategy for colonial waterbirds at TTP;
THAT staff be directed to implement the proposed management strategy for 2014;
THAT staff be directed to continue to actively participate in local, regional and binational
committees /working groups addressing the management and protection of colonial
waterbirds;
THAT staff report back to the Authority bi- annually regarding the management of
Double- crested Cormorants at Tommy Thompson Park or more frequently should the
Strategic Approach be significantly changed;
AND FURTHER THAT staff make a presentation at the March Authority meeting on the
double- crested cormorants management strategy.
BACKGROUND
Tommy Thompson Park is an urban wilderness park located at the foot of Leslie Street in the
City of Toronto. It supports the largest colony of Double- crested Cormorants (DCCO) in the
Great Lakes Region, plus diverse communities of bird, fish, reptile, amphibian, mammal, and
vegetation species. It has been formally designated as a globally significant Important Bird
Area (IBA) and an Environmentally Significant Area (ESA #120). The Master Plan that guides
the development of TTP includes the goal of conserving and managing the natural resources
and environmentally significant areas of the park. While the DCCO colony adds to the diversity
of the park and is environmentally significant, there are concerns about the impacts of DCCO
on tree health and biodiversity in other areas at TTP.
TRCA began a process to ensure the TTP Master Plan goals and objectives were upheld and
the concerns are addressed. TRCA initiated the involvement of stakeholders and the public to
create a management strategy for DCCO at TTP. The process started in November 2007 with
the establishment of the Cormorant Advisory Group, and led to the development of the 2008
Cormorant Management Strategy which was approved by the Authority in 2008 as per
Resolution #A110/08 as follows:
THAT staff be directed to continue to work with the Cormorant Advisory Group to assist
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) in addressing management concerns
regarding colonial waterbirds at Tommy Thompson Park (TTP);
THAT staff be directed to work with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Canadian
Wildlife Service and any other required regulatory agency to seek approval for the 2008
management strategy for colonial waterbirds at TTP;
THAT staff be directed to implement the proposed management strategy for 2008;
THAT staff be directed to continue to actively participate in local, regional and binational
committeeslworking groups addressing the management and protection of colonial
waterbirds;
515
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Authority next year regarding the
management of Double - crested Cormorants at Tommy Thompson Park.
Since 2008 TRCA staff has annually sought approval from the Authority to adopt the
management strategy and has subsequently reported back on the Strategic Approach at the
end of the breeding season:
• 2009 as per Resolution #A22/09,
• 2010 as per Resolution #A23/10,
• 2011 as per Resolution #A49/11, and
• 2012 as per Resolution #A19/12.
• 2013 as per Resolution #A259/12
The overall goal of the Double- crested Cormorant Strategic Approach, as established by the
Cormorant Advisory Group in 2007, is to achieve a balance between the continued existence of
a healthy, thriving cormorant colony and the other ecological, educational, scientific and
recreational values of TTP. The objectives of the Strategic Approach are to:
• increase public knowledge, awareness, and appreciation of colonial waterbirds;
• deter cormorant expansion to Peninsula D;
• limit further loss of tree canopy on Peninsulas A, B and C; and
• continue research on colonial waterbirds in an urban wilderness context.
To achieve the goals and objectives of the Strategic Approach, TRCA employed a suite of
management techniques between 2009 and 2013 that included inactive nest removals,
pre- nesting deterrents, active nest removals and post- nesting deterrents. Along with
deterrents, TRCA also worked to attract DCCO to nest on the ground by enhancing the ground
nesting areas, providing straw for nesting materials, installing DCCO decoys, playing audio of
DCCO courtship calls and limiting disturbance of the ground nesting areas. The "Management
of Double- crested Cormorants at Tommy Thompson Park 2013 Summary Report" provides
details on management actions and is available upon request.
Results from annual population counts show an increase in the ground nesting colony and an
overall decrease in the tree nesting colonies. This data suggested that the management
techniques appear to be effective in meeting the goal and objectives of the Strategic Approach.
Pre - nesting deterrents and active nest removal in the targeted areas continued in 2013 as per
the 2012 Strategic Approach, and as per the Strategic Approach, the active nest removal
followed the conservative protocol for estimating nest age, to avoid removal of nests with eggs
older than 10 days.
Although identified as a management technique in the 2013 Strategic Approach for Peninsulas
B, C and D, the post- breeding deterrents were not undertaken as DCCO did not roost in trees
in these areas.
Public knowledge, awareness and appreciation for DCCO at TTP continued with a remote
webcam in the Peninsula B ground nest colony; a viewing blind on Peninsula C; and staff
interpretation of the colony at various public events, including a Colonial Waterbird Hike at the
TTP Spring Bird Festival, presentations and park tours.
516
In 2013 a total of 11,990 DCCO nests were counted on three of four peninsulas. This
represents a slight increase of 249 nests over the 2012 nest count. The increase in nest
numbers was due mainly to ground nesting on Peninsula B which increased 20 percent from
2012, while the tree nesting populations on Peninsulas A and C decreased by 62 and 25
percent respectively. Tree nesting on Peninsula B increased by 33 percent or 328 tree nests,
which is likely due to increased efforts to keep the public away from the colony (trail barricade
and signage). Overall, the ground nest population has increased 592 percent since
management efforts began in 2008. This is a positive trend showing that ground nest
enhancements are working to help achieve the goal of the continued existence of a healthy,
thriving cormorant colony. The significant increase in the number of ground nests means that
58 percent of the TTP cormorant colony now nests on the ground, so their nests are not
impacting the tree health.
Despite the increase of tree nesting on Peninsula B, overall tree nesting is declining, with the
DCCO population nesting in trees decreasing by 16 percent in 2013. Also in 2013 the number
of trees nested in decreased by 21 percent, thereby resulting in no further loss to the forest
canopy.
Overall, the 2013 Management Strategy was successful in meeting the objectives of the
Strategic Approach.
• while the overall nest numbers have increased by two percent in 2013, DCCO were
effectively deterred from expanding their nesting areas beyond the existing colonies,
including onto Peninsula D;
• ground nesting continued to increase and now represents 58 percent of the entire TTP
DCCO population;
• overall tree nesting decreased by 16 percent;
• colonial waterbird research continued through the work of York University; and
• public knowledge, awareness and appreciation of colonial waterbirds was upheld
through targeted site interpretation by staff at various park events, formal hikes and
tours, as well ground nest colony interpretation using webcam images on the website
and a viewing blind on Peninsula C.
RATIONALE
An extremely high level of concern has been expressed regarding DCCO populations and their
management. Concerns have been raised from both sides, on the one hand calling for
management and the preservation of forest canopy, and on the other hand for protection of the
birds and their nesting colonies. TRCA has an obligation to manage Tommy Thompson Park
as directed by the Master Plan for Tommy Thompson Park as approved under the
Environmental Assessment Act. To meet the intent of the Master Plan, TRCA staff feels that
there is a strong rationale for undertaking a strategic approach to the management of
Double- crested Cormorants at Tommy Thompson Park.
Since November 2007, TRCA has involved stakeholders and the public in assessing the need
for management and developing a strategy for DCCO at TTP. Generally, throughout the
process there has been agreement that some form of management is appropriate, providing
that the methods are humane to cormorants and do not affect other wildlife.
517
Based on the annual data from the nest counts, adaptive management techniques appear to be
effective in meeting the goal and objectives of the Strategic Approach. TRCA's strategy
continues to receive a high level of support from the Cormorant Advisory Group, the public and
TRCA partners. Both the Advisory Group and partners are promoting TRCA's management
approach at other sites throughout the Province of Ontario. As such, TRCA will carry out the
Strategic Approach developed in 2013 (Attachment 1 - Table 1) for the 2014 season
(Attachment 1 — Table 2).
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
A suite of techniques will be utilized in an integrated and adaptive approach to achieve the goal
and objectives of the 2014 Strategic Approach, which maintains the original goal and objectives
from 2007. Attachment 1 — Table 2 provides an overview of the 2014 Strategic Approach.
Increase Public Knowledge, Awareness and Appreciation
• TRCA website, including images from the remote camera. TRCA continues to work on
improvements to the remote camera set -up, and will supplement with images taken
from the remote camera with images and photo interpretation taken by York University
researchers for the TRCA website.
• Conduct interpretive tours for school and interest groups, and at TTP special events.
• Maintain opportunities to view colonial waterbirds with viewing blinds.
• Present information at conferences and forums.
• Participate in working groups on colonial waterbirds.
Inactive Nest Removal
• Remove nests from trees on Peninsulas B and C during the winter, prior to the breeding
season.
Enhanced Ground Nesting
• Place natural nests collected during inactive nest removal in ground nesting areas on
Peninsulas A and B.
• Play auditory breeding calls to attract DCCO to ground nest areas on Peninsula A.
• Deploy DCCO decoys on Peninsula A later in the breeding season to attract late,
inexperienced DCCO to nest in the ground nest area.
• Erect predator exclosures to improve ground nesting success and colony
establishment.
Pre - nesting Deterrents
• The expansion of tree nesting DCCO beyond the existing colonies on Peninsulas B and
C will be prevented. Deterrents will continue on Peninsula B and C to prevent
expansion.
• The location of the trail barricades on Peninsulas B and C may be moved closer to the
colony to act as a DCCO tree nesting deterrent, however if Black- crowned Night Herons
nest in the area the trail barricades will not be moved to prevent disturbance to their
nests.
• DCCO will be prevented from nesting on Peninsula D.
• Deterrent techniques will remain the same as 2013 and employed on an increasing
scale of activity to ensure expansion of the tree nesting area does not occur.
• Staff will monitor the effects deterrent activities have on the DCCO colony as well as on
non - target species.
518
Post - breeding Deterrents
• Deterrent activities will take place as needed on Peninsula C and D to reduce loafing in
trees.
• Techniques will be the same as in previous years and will be employed on an increasing
scale of activity.
Monitoring, Research and Reporting
• Undertake annual nest census for colonial waterbirds in late May.
• Conduct modified annual tree health surveys on Peninsulas A, B, C and D in late
August.
• Continue to collaborate with York University on DCCO research.
• Complete annual summary report.
• Meet with Cormorant Advisory Group to review data and discuss the Strategic Approach
for 2015.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are identified in the Tommy Thompson Park Interim Management account 210 -19 in the
Preliminary 2014 Capital Budget from the City of Toronto.
Report prepared by: Karen McDonald, extension 5248
Emails: kmcdonald @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Karen McDonald, extension 5248,
Ralph Toninger, extension 5366
Emails: kmcdonald @trca.on.ca, roninger @trca.on.ca,
Date: January 16, 2014
Attachments: 1
519
Attachment 1
Table 1: 2013 Strategic Approach Matrix
Table 2: 2014 Proposed Strategic Approach Matrix
Peninsula A
Peninsula B
Peninsula C
Peninsula D
Inactive Nest Removal
(prior to 2012 breeding season)
Enhanced Ground Nesting
Pre - nesting Deterrents
Post - breeding Deterrents
Table 2: 2014 Proposed Strategic Approach Matrix
520
Peninsula A
Peninsula B
Peninsula C
Peninsula D
Inactive Nest Removal
(prior to 2013 breeding season)
Enhanced Ground Nesting
Pre - nesting Deterrents
Post - breeding Deterrents
520
RES. #A228/13 - USE OF RESOURCES DURING AN ELECTION
Approval of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Policy. Approval
of policy and receipt of procedures on Use of Resources During an
Election.
Moved by: Jack Heath
Seconded by: Raymond Cho
THAT the policy on Use of Resources During an Election be approved, outlined in
Attachment 1, as amended;
THAT the procedures on Use of Resources During an Election be received, as outlined in
Attachment 2, as amended;
THAT the policy be added to the category of "Application to the General Public or Have
Significant Implications ";
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Toronto be so advised by the CEO's Office.
RECORDED VOTE
Maria Augimeri
Nay
Ben Cachola
Nay
Raymond Cho
Yea
Ronald Chopowick
Nay
Vincent Crisanti
Yea
Glenn De Baeremaeker
Yea
Michael Di Biase
Yea
Chris Fonseca
Yea
Jack Heath
Yea
Colleen Jordan
Yea
Mujeeb Khan
Yea
Glenn Mason
Nay
Mike Mattos
Yea
Linda Pabst
Yea
Anthony Perruzza
Yea
Dave Ryan
Yea
Deb Schulte
Nay
Cynthia Thorburn
Yea
Jim Tovey
Yea
Richard Whitehead
Yea
THE MOTION WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At its meeting held on February 20 and 21, 2013, Toronto City Council approved a motion
requesting that City agencies adopt policies similar to the City of Toronto's that clarify the
appropriate actions of employees and use of facilities, events, information, infrastructure and
other resources during an election.
521
At Authority Meeting #4/12, held on May 25, 2012, Resolution #A85/12 approved the Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) policy on Conflict of Interest - Employee
Participation in Municipal, Provincial or Federal Elections.
TRCA staff conducted a review of the City of Toronto policy, as well as those of the cities of
Vaughan and Brampton, and towns of Markham and Richmond Hill in preparing the TRCA
policy and procedures for Use of Resources During an Election.
At Authority Meeting #9/13, held on November 22, 2013, Resolution #A196/13 was approved
as follows:
THAT item EX7.6 - Use of Resources During an Election be referred back to staff for
report at a future Authority meeting.
At the Authority meeting Members requested that staff again review the Municipal Elections Act,
1996 and municipal policies on this matter in regard to the following issues:
• booking of TRCA facilities for campaign events;
• ability of Authority Members to purchase tickets personally for campaign events or
contribute to campaigns;
• placing campaign material on vehicles at TRCA facilities;
• use of TRCA -owned logos on campaign material;
• election period definition and date that policy should be in affect within an election year.
RATIONALE
The rationale for this request is to provide a consistent approach to the use of public resources
during an election, to help support confidence in the election process, and to be in keeping
with the Act.
The policy strives to recognize the need to balance freedom of expression and assembly of
candidates with responsibilities while ensuring there is no unfair advantage, promotion or
contributions to any one candidate, party, registrant or supporter of a ballot question.
The policy recommended in Attachment 1, in conjunction with the already approved TRCA
policy on employee participation in elections, meets these objectives, and is consistent with the
City of Toronto policy.
Procedures for implementation of the policy have been approved by TRCA's Directors
Committee, and are outlined for the information of the board in Attachment 2.
Proposed amendments to the policy and procedures from the version presented in November
are identified in Attachments 1 and 2 whereby additions are bold - underlined - italicized and text
to be removed is identified with a strikethrough.
522
The following responds to the questions of members:
• booking of TRCA facilities for campaign events - facilities may be booked for these events
by permit with payment of the fee as per TRCA's Fee Schedule for Public Facilities and
Programming or any other fee schedule that may apply. The Act states that a contribution
is if the facilities are provided at a discounted rate, and the difference between the rate in
the fee schedule and the actual fee charged is the contribution. Therefore if no discount is
offered, there is no contribution under the Act.
• ability of Authority Members to purchase tickets personally for campaign events or
contribute to campaigns - specified this in the policy rather than just the reference that this
policy pertains to TRCA resources and thereby implicitly indicates that it does not apply to
Authority Members personal resources.
• placing campaign material on vehicles at TRCA facilities - is not allowed as TRCA's facilities
are regional attractions rather than local. Campaign material may only be distributed in
permitted areas or at all candidates meetings.
• use of TRCA -owned logos on campaign material - logos can not be placed on campaign
material, but if a logo is in the background of a file photo of a candidate, it may be used.
• election period definition and date that policy should be in affect within an election year -
amended the policy to be effective the first Monday in January in an election year, rather
than June 30th of an election year as previously presented.
The review of municipal policies determined that there is not a consistent approach across the
Toronto region in use of municipal resources during an election. Staff believes the revisions
presented provide comprehensive policy and procedures that meet the specific needs of
TRCA, while being consistent with the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, and are in keeping with
the general intent of TRCA's municipal partners.
Staff recommends that the policy on Use of Resources During an Election be categorized as
"Application to the General Public or Have Significant Implications ", and as such requires
Authority approval, as outlined in the Policy Review staff report approved by the Authority on
July 26, 2013.
Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
Date: September 16, 2013
Attachments: 2
523
Attachment 1
1. PURPOSE
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) policy on "Use of Resources During an
Election" provides a consistent approach and direction to TRCA employees on how TRCA
resources can and cannot be used during municipal, school board, provincial and federal
election campaigns or campaigns on a question on a ballot.
This policy and accompanying procedures establishes guidelines on the appropriate use of
resources during an election period, in order to:
• protect the interests of Authority Members, candidates, staff and TRCA, and
• ensure accountable and transparent election practices.
2. BACKGROUND
TRCA employees may be approached by some candidates to use TRCA resources for the
purposes of campaigning. A clear policy is required to guide the action of TRCA employees and
help determine which requests can be accommodated and which should be denied.
The Municipal Elections Act, 1996 specifies that a municipality or local board cannot make a
contribution to a municipal election candidate (Section 70(4)). A "contribution" includes money,
goods and services given to and accepted by or on behalf of a person for his or her election
campaign (Section 66 (1)).
Since a "contribution" may take the form of money, goods or services, any use of TRCA's
resources for an election campaign by any candidate, may be considered a contribution by
TRCA. Where a candidate pays the regular rate for goods and services as any other individual,
it is not considered a contribution. If a discounted rate or free goods and services were
procured, that would be considered a contribution.
3. SCOPE
This policy and accompanying procedures applies to all Authority Members, candidates in a
municipal, school board, provincial and federal election, and TRCA staff during an election
period.
4. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Chief Executive Officer (CEO): Procedures and guidelines pursuant to the "Use of Resources
During an Election" policy shall be developed to ensure audit implementation compliance. All
issues with respect to this policy and associated procedures should be directed toward the
CEO.
Directors: Directors are responsible for the application of this policy to TRCA resources,
facilities and employees managed by their Divisions.
TRCA Employees: TRCA employees are responsible for understanding and applying this policy
and for seeking clarification and advice if required.
524
5. POLICY
TRCA strives to recognize the need to balance freedom of expression and assembly of
candidates with responsibilities while ensuring there is no unfair advantage, promotion or
contributions to any one candidate, party, registrant or supporter of a ballot question.
TRCA cannot make a contribution (including money, goods and /or services) to any candidate,
political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during an election.
TRCA resources cannot be used to promote one candidate, political party, registrant or a
supporter of a question on a ballot during an election over another candidate, political party,
registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during an election.
This policy is intended to enable continued public and media access to candidates or registrants
for information and interviews. The policy distinguishes between unplanned media scrums or
chance public encounters by candidates and the media, whether in- person or online, and actual
planned media events or rallies.
The policy recognizes that Authority Members are holders of their position until their successor
is appointed, and supports Members in continuing to fulfill their responsibilities as Authority
Members. In addition, it recognizes that Authority Members have political interests outside of
their duties as Authority Members. In this regard, the policy does not apply to Authority
Members' using their personal resources for their own political interests, subject to this use in no
way referencing TRCA or their capacity as an Authority Member. Use of personal resources in
this manner shall not be endorsed by TRCA.
The policy recognizes that Members of Council are holders of their office until the end of their
term and supports Members in continuing to fulfill their responsibilities as Members of Council.
The TRCA CEO's Office shall ensure the policy contained herein and associated procedures
are reviewed on a regular basis (not to exceed three years) and remain relevant to the needs of
TRCA, in accordance with legislative requirements and good business practices.
6. DEFINITIONS
"Authority Member " — means any individual appointed to the board of Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority by a participating member municipality.
"Campaigning" — means any activity by or on behalf of a candidate, political party or question
on a ballot meant to elicit support during the election period. Campaigning does not include the
appearance of elected officials, other candidates or their supporters, or registrants at an event
in their personal capacity without the display of any signage or graphic which identifies the
individual as a candidate or registrant and without the solicitation of votes.
"Campaign Materials" — means any materials used to solicit votes for a candidate(s) or
question in an election including but not limited to literature, banners, posters, pictures, buttons,
clothing or other paraphernalia. Campaign materials include materials in all media, for example,
print, displays, electronic radio or television, online including websites or social media.
525
"Candidate" — means any person who has filed and not withdrawn a nomination for an elected
office at the municipal, school board, provincial or federal level in an election or by- election.
"TRCA Resources" — includes but is not limited to TRCA employees, TRCA events, TRCA
facilities, TRCA funds, TRCA information and TRCA infrastructure. These are further defined as
follows:
"TRCA employees" — for the purpose of this policy, Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority employees includes: all TRCA employees, including full time,
part time and contract employees, as well as paid or unpaid interns and volunteers.
"TRCA events" — means events funded or organized by TRCA or any Authority
Member, including events that may be jointly organized with community organizations
and /or with external sponsors. TRCA events include, but are not limited to:
community meetings and consultations, parks, recreation or cultural facility openings
or celebrations and other special events.
"TRCA facilities" — means any facility which is owned or leased by TRCA and which
is directly managed and operated by TRCA divisions or programs. TRCA facilities do
not include public right -of -ways such as sidewalks, roads and boulevards and
laneways.
"TRCA funds or monies" — means funding support through TRCA's annual operating
or capital budgets, including but not limited to funds provided directly to TRCA
programs and services, Members expenses and staffing budgets.
"TRCA information" — means any information in the custody and control of TRCA,
including databases that may be the repository of names, contact information,
business records, financial information or other identifiers compiled and used by
TRCA employees to conduct TRCA business. Examples of TRCA databases include
but are not limited to: Contact Manager records, lists of event attendees, partners and
TRCA tenants. Constituent information collected by TRCA Members are not under
custody or control of TRCA and are not considered TRCA information for the purpose
of this policy.
"TRCA infrastructure " — means any physical or technology systems that support the
operation of TRCA programs and services, including but not limited to TRCA's fleet and
marine vehicles, computer network, telecommunications and Lotus Notes email system,
wireless equipment, computer hardware, software and peripherals, internet and intranet.
Excludes public right -of -way including sidewalks, roads, laneways and boulevards.
"Contribution" — as defined in the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, as amended means "money,
in -kind support, goods and services given to and accepted by or on behalf of a person for his or
her election campaign ".
"Election" — means an election or by- election at the municipal, school board, provincial and
federal level of government, or the submission of a question or by -law to the electors.
"Election Period" — for the purposes of TRCA, the election period is:
• For a municipal or school board election, the election period commences on June
30th and ends on voting day.
526
• For a provincial or federal election, the election period commences the day the
writ for the election is issued and ends on voting day.
• For a by- election, the period commences when the by- election is called and ends
on voting day.
"Elected Official" — means an individual elected to the House of Commons, the Legislative
Assembly of Ontario, a municipal council or a school board.
"Glad- handing" — means attending a TRCA event as a private individual and interacting with
other event attendees without displaying signage or disseminating material which identifies the
individual as a candidate and without encouraging votes for a candidate, a political party or a
position on a question on a ballot.
"Media Event" — means an event such as a press conference or photo opportunity to which the
media is invited and the purpose of which is to promote a candidate, a political party or a
position on a question on a ballot. Features of a media event can include but are not limited to,
the issuing of a media advisory stating date, time and location of briefing /press conference, use
of backdrops, podiums or public address systems, the distribution of media releases and /or
media kits and /or the display of signage and /or other materials to promote a candidate or a
position on a question on a ballot.
"Media Scrum" — means an unplanned encounter between a candidate, a registrant, their staff
and /or a member or members of the media.
"New /Social Media" — means online technologies and practices used to share opinions,
insights, experiences and perspectives through words, pictures, music, videos and audio. Social
media can take many different forms, including but not limited to internet forums, web logs
(blogs), social blogs, messaging, wikis, podcasts, pictures, video, music sharing, rating and
bookmarking.
"Political Party" — Political parties for provincial and federal elections are those registered with
the Ontario Election Finances Act or in the registry of parties referred to in section 374 of the
Canada Elections Act . Political party for municipal, school board or question on a ballot means
an organization whose fundamental purposes is to participate in public affairs by endorsing one
or more of its members as candidates and supporting their election, or to promote the
acceptance of a certain position on a question on a ballot.
"Question on a Ballot" — means any question or by -law submitted to the electors by Council, a
school board, an elected local board, or the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing under the
Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
"Registrant" — means an individual, corporation or trade union described in paragraphs 1 to 3 of
subsection 70(3) who has registered with the clerk regarding a question on a ballot under the
Municipal Elections Act, 1996 .
"Supporter" — means a supporter of a yes or no response to a question on a ballot but not
incurring expenses like a registrant.
"Voting Day" — means the day on which the final vote is to be taken in an election.
527
RELATED POLICES AND PROCEDURES
Procedures for Use of Resources During an Election
Conflict of Interest - Employee Participation in Municipal, Provincial or Federal Elections
528
Attachment 2
1. Activities Allowable during an Election Period
1.1 Members of the Authority may directly book normally permitted space in a
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) facility at the approved rate
identified in the fee schedule for public facilities and programming, and any other
conditions normally imposed under such permit, shall apply.
1.2 All- candidate meetings can be held at TRCA facilities provided that all candidates
for an office or all registrants are invited to attend such meetings. This clause is
subject to all applicable TRCA policies and procedures.
1.3 Candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during
an election are permitted to distribute campaign materials only in areas permitted
as per Section 1.1 above, subject to the existing permitting policies and
procedures for these facilities.
1.4 Informal media scrums are permitted in public or common areas at TRCA
facilities provided that no apparatus, mechanism or device for the amplification of
the human voice or any sounds is used and that the activity is not disruptive to
regular TRCA business in the vicinity. If the media scrum is disruptive, employees
may ask the participants to find an alternative location. This clause is subject to
all applicable TRCA policies and procedures.
1.5 A candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot
during an election is permitted to attend TRCA events, or events held at TRCA
facilities, in either their capacity as an appointee to TRCA, an elected
representative or as a private citizen to glad -hand with attendees and visitors, but
may not solicit votes for themself, a political party, registrant or a supporter of a
question on a ballot. No election signs may be posted and no campaign materials
may be disseminated at TRCA events. This clause is subject to all applicable
TRCA policies and procedures.
1.6 Permits for generic election - related purposes, such as teaching members of the
public how to become a candidate or the knowledge to organize an election
campaign, can be issued for TRCA facilities as long as no one particular
candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during
an election is promoted or endorsed at the event.
1.7 Elected officials are permitted to attend TRCA- organized events or events held
on TRCA property and act as ceremonial participants in their capacity as elected
officials, including speaking at the event and partaking in ceremonial activities.
Once the writ is issued for provincial or federal elections, MPPs and MPs are no
longer elected officials and therefore should not be invited to attend TRCA
events.
1.8 TRCA online information related to Members will continue to be accessible by the
public.
529
1.9 TRCA databases already made available for public use may be used by
candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during
an election.
1.10 TRCA employees may work on a campaign or support a candidate outside of
their work hours, as long as they abide by the Human Resources policy titled
"Conflict of Interest - Employee Participation in Municipal, Provincial or Federal
Elections" which defines permitted campaign activity. The policy also prohibits
certain employees from participating in any campaign activity.
1.11 Information that is requested and /or provided by TRCA employees to one
candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during
an election shall be made available to all other candidate, political party,
registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot, at their request, either through
posting of the information on the internet or through other mechanisms. The
provision of information to a candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of
a question on a ballot during an election will be coordinated through the CEO's
Office.
1.12 Requests by a candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on
a ballot for personal meetings with TRCA employees, and requests for tours of
TRCA facilities may not always be accommodated due to resource and time
constraints. If a meeting or a tour is organized for one candidate, political party,
registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during an election, TRCA staff
would need to commit to organizing a similar meeting or tour for all other
candidates, political parties, registrants or supporters of a question on a ballot, at
their request.
1.13 A file photo of a candidate with a logo in the background maybe used in
campaign material .
2. Activities Not Allowable during an Election Period
2.1 TRCA resources, including but not necessarily limited to monies, facilities,
equipment, supplies, services or other TRCA resources, may not be used at
anytime to support, endorse or otherwise provide an unfair advantage to any
candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot at any
time, whether during an election period or not.
2.2 TRCA monies may not be used to acquire any resources for any campaign or
election related activities.
2.3 TRCA employees may not campaign or actively work in support of a municipal,
school board, provincial or federal candidate, political party, registrant or a
supporter of a question on a ballot during an election during working hours, but
may during non - working hours as described in the Human Resources policy titled
"Conflict of Interest - Employee Participation in Municipal, Provincial or Federal
Elections ".
530
2.4 TRCA facilities and TRCA infrastructure cannot be used for any election - related
purposes by candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a
ballot, including for the display of any campaign - related signs in windows or on
the facilities, as well as for any other form of campaigning on the facilities,
including distribution of election - related material.
2.5 For permits, licenses, leases, or any other agreement for the use of TRCA
facilities for the promotion of a particular candidate, political party, registrant or a
supporter of a question on a ballot during an election, discounted rates shall not
be provided.
2.6 Any candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot
during an election shall not distribute any campaign materials in TRCA facilities or
at TRCA events, except as described in section 1.3 or during all- candidates
meetings.
2.7 TRCA communications materials, whether for internal or for public distribution,
must not be used to:
a. Profile (name or photograph), make reference to and /or identify any individual as
a candidate in any election or a registrant in a question on a ballot.
b. Advocate for or against a particular candidate, political party, registrant or a
supporter of a question on a ballot during an election.
Communications materials include but are not limited to: media releases, media
advisories, invitations for special events, flyers, posters, banners, brochures and
newsletters.
2.8 Websites or domain names that are funded by TRCA must not include any
campaign materials, make reference to and /or identify any individual as a
candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during
an election, or profile any slogan or symbol associated with a candidate, political
party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during an election.
2.9 News /social media sites, blogs and other new media created and managed by
TRCA employees must not make reference to and /or identify any individual as a
candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during
an election.
2.10 Photographic or video materials which have been or may be created by TRCA
employees or with TRCA resources must not be used in any campaign materials.
2.11 Any TRCA created and owned logo must not be placed specifically in any
campaign materials, except as outlined in Section 1.13 above.
2.12 TRCA databases must not be used by any candidate, political party, registrant or
a supporter of a question on a ballot during an election, unless the database has
already been released for public use as per section 1.9.
2.13 TRCA infrastructure cannot be used for any election purposes.
2.14 TRCA employees will not perform any service, offer any advice or provide any
information solely for the use of one Authority Member, candidate, political party,
registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during an election.
531
2.15 All printing, high speed photocopying and distribution of materials, including
stationery and business cards, will be discontinued for an Authority Member,
candidate, political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during
an election, unless authorized by the Authority, except Agendas and Minutes of
Authority, committee and advisory board meetings are exempt from this
provision. If a compelling corporate need arises during the election period, an
Authority Member who is a candidate may use corporate resources to advise or
contact TRCA constituents, in keeping with the procedures contained herein, with
the consent of the TRCA Chief Executive Officer.
2.16 On any material printed or distributed by TRCA, any Authority Member, candidate,
political party, registrant or a supporter of a question on a ballot during an election
are not permitted to: illustrate that a person is a candidate registered in an
election; identify where a person will be running for office; or profile or refer to
candidates during an election.
2.17 Use of cell phones and PDA's that are funded by TRCA for any election - related
campaign purpose is not permitted, unless TRCA is reimbursed.
2.18 Use of TRCA's voice mail system to record election related messages, and the
computer network and related IT systems (including TRCA's email system) to
distribute election related correspondence, is not permitted.
3. Restrictions related to Services Provided to Authority Members durinq an Election
Year
As Authority Members may also be candidates in an election, after August 1 in the
municipal or school board election year, or on the day the writ for election is issued
for provincial or federal elections, TRCA employees will discontinue the following
activities for Authority Members. The same rule applies to all Authority Members,
irrespective of whether they are seeking election in the new term or not:
3.1 Advertising and other communications materials paid for by TRCA funds and
distributed by TRCA will not reference the name of an Authority Member.
3.2 Event signage, including banners and posters, will not reference the name of an
Authority Member.
3.3 Media releases issued by TRCA employees will not reference the name of an
Authority Member.
4. Audit Compliance
4.1 The CEO's Office is responsible for communication of this protocol to Authority
Members.
4.2 The CEO, Directors, Senior Managers, Managers and Supervisors are responsible
for communication of this protocol to their staff and to investigate reported
contraventions to ensure that there is compliance. All reported contraventions are to
be reported to the CEO or designate.
532
4.2 TRCA staff shall consult with the CEO's Office prior to confirming a booking with a
political client, to ensure the event booking is in compliance with the policy on Use of
Resources During an Election.
4.3 Authority Members and staff are accountable to comply with this protocol.
5. Limitation
5.1 Nothing in this policy shall preclude an Authority Member from performing their job
as an Authority Member, nor inhibit them from representing the interests of the
governing body who appointed them.
RELATED POLICES AND PROCEDURES
Policy for Use of Resources During an Election
Conflict of Interest - Employee Participation in Municipal, Provincial or Federal Elections
533
RES. #A229/13 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS INTERPRETIVE PROGRAM
RSD #13 -129 Award of Contract - Fabrication and Installation of Signage
and Features, City of Toronto. To award Contract RSD #13 -129 for the
fabrication and installation of interpretive signage and features.
Moved by: Linda Pabst
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT Contract RSD #13 -129 for the fabrication and installation of interpretive signage and
features be awarded to Holman Exhibits at a total cost not to exceed $398,633.30, plus
HST, it being the lowest bid meeting Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)
specifications;
THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of ten
percent (10 %) of the total cost of the contract as a contingency allowance, if deemed
necessary;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized staff be directed to take the action necessary to
implement the contract including obtaining any approvals and the signing and execution
of documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Don Valley Brick Works is located at 550 Bayview Avenue in the City of Toronto.
Developed by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority as an urban openspace park in the
1990's, the site is under management by City of Toronto - Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The
site includes two major components:
Evergreen at the Brick Works - an actively programmed area comprised of a collection of
former industrial and new office buildings and public amenities including markets, garden
centre, cafe, etc., all focused on promoting and educating visitors about sustainable living,
and;
2. Don Valley Brick Works Park - a natural openspace that provides a variety of habitat and
passive recreational opportunities in the midst of the city. The parkland includes the
Weston Quarry Garden, three geologically significant slope features, a number of trails,
footpaths, ponds, wetlands and meadows.
In 2008, TRCA engaged The Planning Partnership (TPP) to undertake a study to formulate
strategies to address user circulation in the Lower Don Valley, centered around the Don Valley
Brick Works and surrounding natural features. With the development of Evergreen at the Brick
Works, it was anticipated that there would be a significant increase in the number of users
accessing the site from the surrounding attractions as well as the road and trail system and that
increased level and type of use would impact the existing natural heritage infrastructure.
534
The Circulation Strategy identified a number of initiatives to make user accessibility and
interpretive improvements at the Don Valley Brick Works site while aiming to protect and restore
the area's ecological functions. Included in these improvements and completed to date are the
establishment of a South Entrance pedestrian site access and improvements to the adjacent
dogs off leash area, the design and construction of the Weston Quarry Garden Entrance
Feature and the mid -point pedestrian access linked to the Belt Line trail. In progress are
improvements to the parkland trails to direct users safely and appropriately through the park
while closing and restoring unsanctioned footpaths to protect the habitat and features within
the park and local vicinity.
This initiative specifically addresses the City's objective to interpret the natural and cultural
significance of the parkland and its various habitat features in order to engage, orient and
educate park users. To accomplish this goal, City of Toronto retained Reich + Petch Design
International to develop conceptual and detailed design for implementing the Interpretive
Master Plan (2011) into a series of interpretive nodes, signs and other educational content.
TRCA has been requested to assist the City in delivering and managing this piece of work in
conjunction with other environmental and landscape improvements recently implemented and
currently underway.
This work is being funded in part through the ongoing generous support of the Weston Family
Foundation.
RATIONALE
A pre - qualification call for Tender RSD13 -129 was publicly advertised on the electronic
procurement website Biddingo (http: / /www.biddingo.com /) on Friday, September 20, 2013 in
accordance with TRCA's Purchasing Policy and practices. As a result, a total of 22 companies
took the pre - qualification documents and eight companies submitted completed packages in
accordance with the requirements of the pre - qualification process. Submissions were
evaluated based on the following factors:
• completeness of submission;
• relevant project experience - type and budget;
• financial references and bonding ability;
• ability to meet project milestones /timing;
• personal resumes for key project staff;
• construction volume and consistency;
• project references - client and /or consultant.
The following total of six companies were pre - qualified to submit tender bid prices. Tender bid
documents were posted and distributed to the pre - qualified companies through the electronic
procurement website Biddingo with a closing date of November 21, 2013, including:
• Alpeza General Contracting Inc.;
• Expographiq;
• Holman Exhibits Ltd.;
• Kubik Inc;
• Spectra Advertising;
• WSI Sign Systems Ltd.
535
A mandatory pre -bid site meeting was held on October 29, 2013 to review project scope and
site conditions with prospective bidders. Only four of the prequalified bidders attended the
mandatory site meeting.
A total of five Addendums were issued to respond to questions posed and to assist bidders in
preparing their bid submissions. Through issued addenda the tender closing date was
extended to Thursday, December 19, 2013. Two completed tender bids were received.
The Tender Opening Committee opened tenders on Thursday, December 19, 2013 with the
following results:
Contract RSD #13 -129 Don Valley Brick Works Interpretive Program -
Fabrication and Installation of Signage and Elements
BIDDERS
TOTAL BID PRICE
(Plus HST)
Alpeza General Contracting Inc.
$438,250.00
Holman Exhibits Ltd.
$398,633.30
Staff therefore recommends that Holman Exhibits Ltd. be awarded Contract RSD #13 -129 for
the implementation of the Don Valley Brick Works Interpretive Program for the stipulated price
of $398,633.30 plus HST, it being the lowest bidder meeting TRCA specifications. The contract
is subject to a 10% contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff.
Staff has confirmed with the City of Toronto Fair Wage Office that Holman Exhibits Ltd. and
proposed sub - trades are compliant with the Fair Wage Policy and the associated collective
agreements.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
All expenditures that pertain to this contract will be assigned to the Don Valley Brick Works
project budget account 117 -66.
The total cost of this project initiative including all construction, geotechnical inspections and
review services and project management fees is expected to be on the order of $450,000
excluding contingency and HST.
Funding in the order of $200,000 is being provided by the Weston Family Foundation through
The Living City Foundation. The balance of funds are fully recoverable from the City of Toronto.
Report prepared by: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378
Emails: drogalsky @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378
Emails: drogalsky @trca.on.ca
Date: January 15, 2014
536
RES. #A230/13 - EAST POINT PARK BIRD SANCTUARY
Award of Tender #RSD 13 -092 - Pavilions and Landscape Elements, City
of Toronto. To award the contract for the East Point Park Bird Sanctuary -
Pavilions and Landscape Elements project.
Moved by: Linda Pabst
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT the contract for the construction and implementation of the East Point Park Bird
Sanctuary - Pavilions and Landscape Elements, be awarded to Hawkins Contracting
Services Limited (HCS) at a total cost not to exceed $576,764.20, plus HST, it being the
lowest bid meeting Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;
THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of ten
percent (10 %) of the total cost of the contract as a contingency allowance, if deemed
necessary;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized staff be directed to take the action necessary to
implement the contract including obtaining any approvals and the signing and execution
of documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Bird watching as a popular leisure activity has increased dramatically in the past few decades.
The Toronto Bird Sanctuary and Flyways Project is targeted to implement a series of ecological
enhancements and improvements at six key sites across the City in order to enhance and
protect bird habitat and increase associated birding activity. The program began in 2010.
East Point Park is one such significant natural openspace area along the Lake Ontario
waterfront in the City of Toronto (Scarborough). As such, it forms a major point of interest and
recreational opportunity for the public to view and enjoy migrating birds and learn about the
importance of the ravine system and waterfront in facilitating the life cycle of birds.
The East Point Park Bird Sanctuary - Pavilions and Landscape Elements project consists of five
major components:
1. entrance features and wayfinding signage;
2. main pavilion - to provide rain /sun shelter for visitors and park users while viewing birds and
providing information regarding common migratory bird species found within the Greater
Toronto Area;
3. soundspace - a seating area within a woodland grove that aims to focus on providing users
an auditory experience;
4. bird blind - a small viewing blind that will allow bird enthusiasts to observe
wetland /marshland birds in their natural habitat, and;
5. various landscape improvements including pathway surface upgrades and seating stones.
At the request of the City of Toronto, TRCA has been asked to assist with the coordination,
approvals and implementation of this work.
537
RATIONALE
Tender RSD13 -092 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo
http: / /www.biddingo.com /) on Monday, September 23, 2013, and a mandatory site meeting
was held on Tuesday, October 1, 2013 to review project scope and site conditions with
prospective bidders. Request for Quotation packages were sent to five suppliers that attended
the mandatory site meeting as follows:
• Direct Construction Company Ltd.;
• Ferdom Construction;
• Hawkins Contracting Services Ltd.;
• Hilton Construction Corporation;
• Joe Pace and Sons Contracting Inc.
The Tender Opening Committee opened tenders on Friday, November 1 st, 2013 with the
following results:
Contract RSD13 -092- East Point Park Bird Sanctuary - Pavilions and
Landscape Elements
BIDDERS
TOTAL BID PRICE
(Plus HST)
REVISED BID
PRICE
(Plus HST)
Direct Construction Company Ltd.
$1,145,928.00
$867,826.20
Hawkins Contracting Services Ltd.
$787,973.60
$576,764.20
Joe Pace and Sons Contracting Inc.
$1,044,431.00
$795,835.80
Ferdom Construction
no bid
no bid
Hilton Construction Corporation
no bid
no bid
As the bids received were all well above the project budget limit, staff deleted certain elements
of the work to reduce the overall project cost to an acceptable level. This was done in
consultation with the City of Toronto, a partner and funder for this work. The portions of the
work that were removed from the contract included the soundspace and associated work as a
whole, the application of alternate pricing to the main pavilion for reducing the thickness of
weathering steel panels and deletion of the pergola, as well as the deletion of various
landscape and seating elements. The changes to the scope of work will enable the project to
proceed and still meet the overall objectives of the bird sanctuary and flyways program.
Considering these changes to the scope of work, staff therefore recommends that Hawkins
Contracting Services Ltd. be awarded Contract RSD #13 -092 for the implementation of the East
Point Park Bird Sanctuary as amended for the stipulated price of $576,764.20 plus HST, it
being the low bidder meeting TRCA specifications. The contract is subject to a 10%
contingency to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff.
Staff has confirmed with the City of Toronto Fair Wage Office that HCS and proposed
sub - trades are compliant with the Fair Wage Policy and the associated collective agreements.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
All expenditures that pertain to this contract will be assigned to the East Point Park project
budget account 117 -42.
538
The total cost of the project including all construction, arch itectu ral/structural/geotechn ical
inspections and review services and project management fees is expected to be on the order of
$682,000 excluding contingency and HST.
In accordance with the Council resolution passed January 06, 2014, these expenses are fully
recoverable from the City of Toronto.
Report prepared by: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378
Emails: drogalsky @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378
Emails: drogalsky @trca.on.ca
Date: December 10, 2013
RES. #A231/13 - NEWTONBROOK CREEK BRIDGE PROJECT
Contract RSD13 -131 - Steel Bridge Fabrication and Delivery. Award of
Contract RSD13 -131 for the fabrication and delivery of a 30 metre long
corten steel pedestrian bridge at Newtonbrook Creek, in the City of
Toronto.
Moved by: Linda Pabst
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT Contract RSD13 -131 for the fabrication and delivery of a 30 metre long corten steel
pedestrian bridge at Newtonbrook Creek, in the City of Toronto, be awarded to Ganawa
Company Ltd. for the total cost not to exceed $93,478.00, plus HST, as they are the lowest
bidder that best meets Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) specifications;
THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of
$9,500.00 as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary;
THAT should staff be unable to execute an acceptable contract with the awarded
contractor, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with the
other contractors that submitted tenders, beginning with the next lowest bidder meeting
TRCA specifications;
THAT the award of contract(s) be conditional upon entering into a memorandum of
understanding between TRCA and City of Toronto, and confirmation of available funding
for the project;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take such action as is
necessary to implement the contract, including obtaining any required approvals and the
signing and execution of documents.
CARRIED
539
BACKGROUND
The City of Toronto proposed to implement a multi -use pathway (approximately 800 m long)
through a section of the Hydro One hydro corridor, north of Finch Avenue from approximately
Maxome Avenue to Bayview Avenue. The trail system is part of a more comprehensive plan to
construct a new multi -use trail system between Yonge Street and Victoria Park Avenue, which
includes the need to cross Newtonbrook Creek. In order to provide a continuous trail system
through the project limits, a pedestrian bridge is required over Newtonbrook Creek. TRCA
therefore requires the services of a qualified contractor to carry out the fabrication and delivery
of a 30 m long by 3.5 metre wide corten steel pedestrian bridge to meet the detailed design
requirements.
RATIONALE
This project is aligned with leadership strategy number three in TRCA's new strategic plan.
Through thoughtful planning and action this project will create a network of greenspace and
green infrastructure that weaves through every community to connect a healthy and resilient
landscape.
Tender RSD13 -131 was publicly advertised on the electronic procurement website Biddingo (
http: / /www.biddingo.com /) on Wednesday, October 9th, 2013. Tender packages were sent to
23 contractors as follows:
• AIL - Atlantic Industries Limited; • Harvie Construction Inc.;
• Allied Marine & Industrial;
• Armtec Limited Partnership;
• BCB Metal and Trading Company;
• Cedar Springs Landscape Group;
• Construction Demathieu & Bard;
• DeCourcy Steel Ltd.;
• Dig -Con International Ltd.;
• Eagle Bridge Inc;
• Facca Inc. ;
• Ganawa Company Ltd.;
• Guardian Bridge Rapid Construction Inc.;
• Iron Bridge Fabrication;
• Marcrest Construction Ltd.;
• North Star Technical Inc.;
• Nuvia;
• Pomerleau Inc.;
• Remo General Contracting Ltd
• Ross Steel;
• Sheffield Contracting;
• Trade -Mark Industrial Inc.; and
• Velez Constructors Inc.
The Procurement Opening Committee opened the Tenders on Friday, October 18th, 2013 with
the following results:
RSD13 -131 Newtonbrook Creek Bridge Project - Steel Bridge Fabrication and Delivery
BIDDERS
TOTAL TENDER AMOUNT
(Plus HST)
Ganawa Company Ltd.
$93,478.00
Iron Bridge Fabrication
$98,000.00
Of the 23 contractors, 21 declined the opportunity to submit a bid, being unable to meet the
timelines and specifications stated in the contract documents.
540
Restoration Services staff reviewed the bid received from Ganawa Company Ltd. against its
own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and also meets the
requirements and deliverables as outlined in the contract documents. Further assessment by
TRCA staff of Ganawa Company Ltd's experience and ability to undertake similar projects was
conducted through reference checks which resulted in positive feedback that Ganawa
Company Ltd. is capable of undertaking the scope of work.
Based on the bids received, staff recommend that Ganawa Company Ltd. be awarded Contract
RSD13 -131 for the fabrication and delivery of a 30 metre long corten steel pedestrian bridge at
Newtonbrook Creek, in the City of Toronto, for a total amount not to exceed $93,478.00, plus a
contingency amount of $9,500.00 to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff, plus HST, it
being the lowest bid that meets TRCA specifications.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
City of Toronto, Transportation Services will be contributing $500,000.00 to complete this
project. Funds to undertake this project are available within account #186 -39.
Report prepared by: Michelle Guy, 416 - 786 -5128
Emails: mguy @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: James Dickie, 416 - 392 -9702
Emails: jdickie @trca.on.ca
Date: January 15, 2014
RES. #A232/13 - TOWN OF WH ITCH URCH- STOUFFVILLE PROPOSAL FOR LEASE OF
LAND
Bruce's Mill Conservation Area, Regional Municipality of York. Proposal to
lease Toronto and Region Conservation Authority -owned land located
within the Bruce's Mill Conservation Area in the Town of
Whitchurch - Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York, to construct and
operation a BMX (non- motorized) dirt racing course.
Moved by: Linda Pabst
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has been approached, to
enter into a lease of lands for a BMX (non- motorized) dirt racing course at Bruce's Mill
Conservation Area (BMCA), by the Town of Wh itch urch - StouffviIle;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA, that it is in the best interests of TRCA to
further its objectives as set out in the Bruce's Mill Conservation Area Master Plan, to enter
into a lease agreement with the Town of Wh itch urch - StouffviIle;
541
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA enter into a lease of lands with the Town
of Wh itch urch - StouffviIle for approximately 1.0 hectares (2.47 acres), more or less,
together with the use of existing road surfaces for access and utilities, to construct and
operate a BMX (non- motorized) dirt racing course at Bruce's Mill Conservation Area, said
land being Part of Lot 30, Concession 5, Town of Wh itch urch - StouffviIle, Regional
Municipality of York;
THAT the lease with the Town of Wh itch urch - StouffviIle be premised on the following
general terms and conditions:
(i) the initial term of the lease shall be five years with one renewal option under the
same general terms and conditions, for a further five year term, subject to the
concurrence of TRCA and the Town of Wh itch urch - StouffviIle;
(ii) the Town of Wh itch urch - StouffviIle shall be responsible for any and all necessary
approvals and costs associated with the construction and operation of a BMX dirt
racing track;
(iii) any other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by TRCA staff or solicitor;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may
be required to implement the lease, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and
the signing and execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
It is the intention of TRCA to draw additional users to its facilities in order to expand and
diversify the client base, resulting in increased revenue and significant health benefits to the
community. BMX (bicycle motocross) racing is a popular outdoor activity for youth and a
featured event in the upcoming PanAm games in Toronto.
In 2011, TRCA completed the Bruce's Mill Conservation Area Master Plan. To achieve the
vision for BMCA, concept themes were developed to guide the recommendations of the master
plan. These concept themes serve to focus the plan on identifying and enhancing strengths of
the property, while also considering opportunities for growth.
"Active Lifestyles" is one of the guiding themes of the master plan, and emphasizes the
provision of active lifestyle opportunities being an important function of BMCA. As such, the
master plan seeks to enhance existing recreational features and experiences, while also
considering the implementation of new opportunities, such as the BMX racing course.
Promoting active lifestyles is an important value to TRCA and its municipal partners, and the
master plan for BMCA seeks to appeal to a diverse audience of users through a range of
recreational features and experiences.
Several key recommendations of the Bruce's Mill Conservation Area Master Plan, as outlined in
Chapter 5: Public Use and Recreation Plan, are supportive of a facility such as the BMX racing
course. These recommendations include the following:
• Provide opportunities for appropriate, accessible, nature -based recreation and
active - lifestyle activities that are consistent with all other objectives.
542
• Plan and manage appropriate outdoor recreation facilities in a manner that protects
ecological health while providing social benefits.
• Encourage appropriate, low- impact recreational activities to build healthy communities
and healthy people.
• Encourage long -term economic vitality through strategic planning and partnership
development.
• Foster development and engagement of community members as a key to building a
stewardship ethic. Recognize and value people's connections to land and provide
recreation and experiential learning that is compatible with the natural and cultural
values of the land.
• Develop and provide recreation activities that have opportunities for a regional
audience, to reduce competition with municipal facilities and ensure a broad visitor base
• Promote BMCA as a destination for active - lifestyle choices and Canadian heritage
experiences.
It is the intention of TRCA to pursue the recommendations outlined in the Bruce's Mill
Conservation Area Master Plan. The proposed BMX racing course will be a value added
attraction for the operating season of BMCA facilities. The course will operate during regular
park hours between May and October.
The proposed facility will require an area roughly one hectare in size. The facility will include a
300 - 600 metre long dirt racing track including associated track infrastructure, spectator
seating and perimeter fencing.
A one hectare area within BMCA has been identified as a suitable site to locate the facility. This
location is situated within an existing picnic area. This site is identified as a "Public Use Zone"
within the Bruce's Mill Conservation Area Master Plan, and the facility is therefore deemed a
compatible use for this site. Internal TRCA archaeological and ecological assessments have
been carried out and confirm that this site is suitable for hosting the facility.
The cost for installation of the BMX track and associated infrastructure is estimated to be
$141,000, over three years. The proponent will be responsible for funding all of the
construction and operating costs of the facility. Clean fill for this project will be made available
from the approved Bruce's Mill Grading and Filling project, Resolution #A143/13, where the
Regional Municipality of York will strategically place clean surplus fill on TRCA -owned
tablelands within Bruce's Mill Conservation Area. The Town of Wh itch urch- StouffviIle will then
be responsible for the grading and construction of the BMX course.
Beyond construction of the facility, the proponent's proposal outlines a commitment to building
partnerships with local and regional cycling communities, and fostering community
participation to make the facility a success. In addition to regular recreational and practice
riding at the facility, the proponent will host race events and provide coaching /learning
opportunities for riders, with long -term objectives including the development of a non - profit club
to maintain and promote the facility, and the eventual goal of hosting a provincial championship
series event.
543
RATIONALE
TRCA was approached by the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville to provide lands for the
construction and operation of a BMX racing course.
A business plan was presented to TRCA outlining the details of the construction, maintenance,
operation, timelines and funding of the project.
The proposal was reviewed and evaluated in detail using the following evaluation criteria:
• support of the objectives and recommendations of the Bruce's Mill Conservation Area
Master Plan (TRCA, 2011);
• financial benefits to TRCA through increased draw to Bruce's Mill Conservation Area;
• detailed design and drawings;
• business management plan;
• qualifications and capabilities;
• detailed description of the proponent's understanding of the project, including overall
scope and objectives, and a discussion of potential issues that may require particular
attention;
• proponent's social performance locally and globally;
• description of commitment to corporate environmental stewardship;
• project work plan including a detailed schedule indicating the start date and the anticipated
duration of each task, together with the timing of key milestones and meetings;
• term of lease; and
• references.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Upon TRCA approval, the necessary negotiations required to implement the lease and
development of the outlined BMX racing course is subject to terms and conditions
satisfactory to TRCA staff and solicitor.
TRCA will also foster partnerships with existing client groups such as day camps and the
Community Safety Village to increase and drive clientele to the BMX racing course.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The cost for installation of the BMX track and associated infrastructure is estimated to be
$141,000, over three years. The proponent, the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, will be
responsible for obtaining any necessary approvals and for funding all of the construction and
operating costs of the facility. TRCA will provide some in kind operational and administrative
services.
Report prepared by: Joe Petta, 647 - 281 -9180
Emails: jpetta @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Derek Edwards, extension 5672
Emails: dedwards @trca.on.ca
Date: October 04, 2013
Attachments: 1
544
Attachment 1
-71
rya wt,
545
0
545
RES. #A233 /13 - EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS: ASSESSING THE 2013 ICE STORM
Update on damages from the 2013 ice storm.
Moved by: Jim Tovey
Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan
THAT estimates of damages incurred by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
(TRCA) due to the 2013 ice storm be provided to the regions of Durham, Peel and York,
and the City of Toronto for inclusion in their respective requests for provincial and /or
federal funding;
THAT TRCA request financial assistance from the municipalities to recover the cost of
damages due to the ice storm;
THAT staff be directed to initiate discussions with municipal partners to create
agreements where possible if a management agreement currently does not exist;
AND FURTHER THAT staff develop a public corporate service disruption communications
plan as well as an internal employee communications plan.
AMENDMENT
RES. #A234 /13
Moved by: Jim Tovey
Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan
THAT the following be inserted after the main motion:
AND FURTHER THAT staff report on the status of removal of debris from watercourses in
TRCA's jurisdiction at Authority Meeting #2/13, scheduled to be held on March 28, 2014.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
THE RESULTANT MOTION READS AS FOLLOWS:
THAT estimates of damages incurred by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
(TRCA) due to the 2013 ice storm be provided to the regions of Durham, Peel and York,
and the City of Toronto for inclusion in their respective requests for provincial and /or
federal funding;
THAT TRCA request financial assistance from the municipalities to recover the cost of
damages due to the ice storm;
THAT staff be directed to initiate discussions with municipal partners to create
agreements where possible if a management agreement currently does not exist;
546
THAT staff develop a public corporate service disruption communications plan as well as
an internal employee communications plan;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report on the status of removal of debris from watercourses in
TRCA's jurisdiction at Authority Meeting #2/13, scheduled to be held on March 28, 2014.
BACKGROUND
The southern Ontario ice storm occurred from December 20 -22, 2013. The storm brought
approximately 50 mm of precipitation, and when that rain became "super- cooled" it turned to
ice on contact with surfaces. Of the 50 mm of precipitation, Environment Canada estimates
approximately 20 -30 mm was retained as ice on surfaces; up to 10 cm of ice was observed on
tree branches across the region. The storm impacted TRCA operations in several ways. This
report provides a summary of the impacts, TRCA's response during and after the event and
lessons learned. Environment Canada has indicated that we can expect to see more rain and
freezing rain events, and fewer snowfall events in winter months. By examining the impacts of
this most recent severe weather event, we will be able to build resiliency into TRCA operations
to better prepare for the extreme weather events of the future.
Municipalities within the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) also experienced damages as a result of
the southern Ontario ice storm, a summary of the Ontario Disaster Relief Assistance Program
(ODRAP) is included in Attachment 1.
I. Key Findings of the Review
TRCA's efforts during and immediately after the storm focused on public safety in TRCA
facilities. Impacts to most operations were minimal as offices were closed for the holidays
for most of the storm, as were most Parks and Culture facilities. Passive use trails and
Albion Hills Conservation Area cross - country skiing activities were notable exceptions;
these were closed due to fallen woody debris and ice hazards. Flood control channels
were also inspected for woody debris.
2. Initial estimates of costs relating to the storm are $1.3 million (see Section IV). The majority
of the costs incurred relate to Park Management, Forest Management and Land Care.
TRCA currently receives land care funding from Peel Region and York Region. With the
potential for recurring severe weather events similar to the ice storm, additional funding for
these programs should be pursued for all regions to ensure management practices are able
to support future stressors due to weather.
3. TRCA Maintenance Services staff was on call, available and engaged in emergency repair
and coordination throughout the holidays, with the exception of December 25th, Christmas
Day. Forty -seven rental properties were impacted by the ice storm (e.g., power outages,
hazardous /fallen trees and plumbing repairs).
4. Although forest edges sustained significant damages due to the ice, this will not result in
major long -term damages to forests as a whole. TRCA's Forest Hazard Management
Program is effective and no changes are proposed to the program (or to the TRCA Hazard
Tree Policy) as a result of recent weather event. Impacts to trees are much more significant
on urban streets or in manicured parks and parking lots (refer to Attachment 2, for
information on urban forests and TRCA initiatives).
547
5. TRCA does not currently have management agreements in place with all municipalities to
manage TRCA -owned valleylands. Agreements should be pursued where they do not
currently exist. TRCA should confirm with municipalities where management agreements
exist, that TRCA does not engage in debris removal from channels and that this
responsibility, when necessary, rests with municipalities as part of the management
agreements.
6. Woody debris in a valley is natural and is only a concern in areas where it may compromise
the function of infrastructure and therefore exacerbate flooding (e.g., blocking crossings) or
put infrastructure at risk from erosion. As such, TRCA has developed an exemption
protocol (Attachment 3), whereby under specific circumstances municipalities /proponents
do not need to contact TRCA, provided that best management practices are employed. If
the situation does not meet these criteria, then municipalities /proponents are encouraged to
contact TRCA Planning and Development staff for guidance prior to removal of debris. Any
debris removal should take place before March 31 st or after July 1 st, if possible, so as not
to impact the spring spawning period for fish.
7. TRCA will work with its partners to assist in identifying where debris may contribute to flood
risk. Several municipalities have already requested flood vulnerable area mapping and
assistance in developing screening criteria (e.g., City of Markham, City of Brampton, Town
of Caledon).
8. TRCA emergency action plans and their associated communications plans are in place, and
are effective for dealing with crisis communications. However, a communications strategy
to inform clients and staff about service disruptions that do not stem from an acute
emergency is required. A service disruption communication plan and employee
communications plan should be developed to improve the response to future severe
weather events, as well as other types of events that may impact TRCA operations.
9. GTA Mayors have come together in a coordinated approach to request financial assistance
from the Provincial and Federal governments. In addition, the GTA mayors have requested
the expansion of existing programs, and the development of new programs, relating to
disaster mitigation. The Resolutions pertaining to these two issues are included in
Attachment 4.
10. The prospects of a changing climate and its effects on weather patterns threaten to make
ice storms more frequent and their effects more severe. TRCA should continue to monitor
these events and adjust its programs, policies and guidelines accordingly.
II. Severe Weather Events
The Genesis of the 2013 Ice Storm:
In late December 2013 a warm air system moving from the southwest collided with a cold Arctic
mass present over the Great Lakes. The collision of these systems ultimately caused a line of
freezing rain running along the Great Lakes.
•
A polar vortex is a feature in the atmosphere above both poles that consists of air circulating
around a central low pressure area. The stronger the polar vortex, the more intense the
circulation and the resulting tendency to pull Arctic air inwards. As the polar vortex weakens,
colder arctic air will be allowed to move further south. This causes "meanders" in the position of
the northern jet stream. In late December, a weakening polar vortex had pushed the northern
jet stream further south than normal bringing bitterly cold polar air and driving the collision of
the two air masses. This mixing of polar air with the warm, moist air mass moving north from
Texas made for ideal freezing rain conditions in southern Ontario.
The collision of these air masses caused a mix of rain, snow and freezing rain to fall on the GTA
and surrounding areas between December 20th and 23rd. The bulk of the freezing rain that hit
the GTA began falling around 8pm on December 20th continuing until lam on December 21 st.
A second period of freezing rain began later that morning, and continued through the night into
the afternoon of December 22nd. Nearly 25 mm of freezing rain was recorded at Pearson
International Airport, with as much as 30 mm recorded towards the eastern part of TRCA's
jurisdiction.
Prior to the onset of the storm, the GTA had a snowpack of approximately 13 cm (recorded at
Pearson Airport). Due to the combination of near 0 °C temperatures and rainfall, much of this
snowpack had melted by December 23rd, with only 3 cm remaining. By December 23rd, the
storm had moved further east and all weather watches and warnings for the GTA were
discontinued.
1998 Ice Storm (Eastern Ontario and Quebec):
A similar event occurred in eastern Ontario and Quebec in January 1998 bringing
approximately 75 -100 mm of freezing rain. The driver of this event is similar to the 2013 event,
where a warm air mass moving north from Texas collided with a polar air mass over eastern
Ontario and Quebec. Due to the severity of this storm millions were left without power, from
days to weeks, and in some instances months. It led to 35 fatalities and had insured losses
totalling approximately $1.6 billion. The ice storm of 1998 was one of the worst natural disasters
in Canadian history in terms of insurable damages; it was only recently surpassed by the
Calgary floods of 2013. The 2013 ice storm in the GTA resulted in approximately $200 million in
insurable damages and disruption to everyday lives was on a much smaller scale.
III. TRCA Operational Impacts
This section provides a summary of the impacts and response by staff during and after the ice
storm. Attachment 5 illustrates the locations of the properties mentioned herein. The main
program areas that were affected include:
1. forest management;
2. flood management;
3. Parks and Culture facilities;
4. conservation lands;
5. TRCA rental and office properties;
6. communications.
549
1. Forest Management
Forest Health Management
Overall, the most damage to forested areas was seen on the edges of forest stands. These
areas included the sides of lakes, ponds, marshes and meadows, where the trees generally
were growing on an angle out towards the openings. The cumulative effect of trees not
growing vertically and the general nature of the species of trees growing on the edges
combined to create the observed damages. Early successional species, which tend to grow
fastest and with the lowest structural integrity, incurred the most damage overall. Effected
species were primarily Manitoba maple and willows, and to a lesser extent silver and red maple.
The slower growing, stronger trees found inside of the woodlots have, for the most part, shown
very little damage. Coniferous tree species showed surprisingly little damage, unless there
had been defects present prior to the storm event. There has been almost no damage noted
within areas of young reforestation, with overall survival and success of these not being
negatively affected. Fortunately, the overall area of forest canopy for TRCA is the same now as
it was prior to the ice storm. Therefore, no special activities are required as a result of the ice
storm to protect forest health.
There has been a lot of concern regarding the long term effects of the ice storm of December
2013 on the health of TRCA forests in the GTA. However, when looking at the storm's impacts
on the ecological function of the forests, the overall impacts are very small. It must be
remembered that storms of this nature are actually natural occurrences and that forests have
been enduring such phenomena for a very long time. While broken tree limbs may become
safety hazards to the general public in the short term, they may have little impact on the health
of the trees. The visible damage today will manifest itself in perhaps 20 or 30 years as decay
columns within the trees, as they continue to grow and mature. This should not significantly
impact the integrity or health of these trees and may actually improve forest function from a
wildlife perspective. Increases in the number of cavity trees, or trees with any dead wood will
offer improved feeding and nesting opportunities for many wildlife species.
TRCA's Forest Management Program improves the overall health of forest systems by
selectively managing to promote a diverse natural forest by removing defective, diseased,
poorly formed trees and non - native species where appropriate. While many of these individual
trees are desirable from a wildlife perspective, TRCA's management activities allow us to
maintain these forest functions in areas where the public would not be at risk. It is difficult to
quantify the benefits of the Forest Management Program specifically related to severe weather
impacts. However, effective forest management leads to healthier, more resilient forests as a
whole, and makes them less susceptible to the effects of severe weather than had the forests
not been managed.
One cannot discount the potential impacts of increased frequency and severity of extreme
weather events on forests. Long term impacts may include altered species compositions,
greater potential for disease and pests due to tree injuries and reductions in age classes.
Diminished leaf area and increases in disease and pests may cause heightened levels of tree
mortality and a general decline in ecosystem services. Land care plans should be developed
with these future stressors in mind.
550
Hazard Management
TRCA implements a Hazard Tree Program that routinely assesses and mitigates hazards due to
dead, decaying or defective trees on TRCA- managed properties. The program utilizes
assessment criteria and has established service delivery standards. The Hazard Tree Policy
applies to trees, portions of trees or attached limbs that are greater than 15 cm in diameter and
create a fall hazard. Once a part of the tree is on the ground it is no longer deemed to be a
hazard under the Hazard Tree Policy, although if it creates an impediment to passage (e.g., on
trail systems or roadways) it will be moved out of the way.
Damages
Managing of TRCA forests for biodiversity and overall forest health has kept the damage levels
to a minimum. Therefore, no additional immediate costs have been incurred to remediate the
impacts of the ice storm to forested areas. The damage occurring to the woodlots in the short
term was very erratic. While most properties north of King Road had very little damage, some
of the TRCA properties were impacted more than others. Four of the hardest hit properties
were Boyd Conservation Area, Heart Lake Conservation Area, Albion Hills Conservation Area
and Lake St. George Field Centre. Management plans for these areas will need to be revisited
to ensure future resiliency of the lands in the face of more frequent severe weather events.
This section speaks to the managed forest lands and does not include work done after the
storm at managed parklands (i.e., Parks facilities). Costs to clear access routes and active -use
trails are captured below in Section 3: Parks and Culture Facilities, Table 2.
2. Flood Management
Flood Forecasting and Warning
During the course of the ice storm, TRCA Flood Duty Officers were on call and carried out their
usual daily assessments of flood risk. There were no flooding concerns associated with the
rain and warm temperatures. In fact, rivers responded very slowly and saw only a few
centimetres rise in water levels, as the mild temperatures gradually melted the snowpack after
the ice storm. While some debris jams and /or ice accumulation in local areas was anticipated,
TRCA did not receive any reports from our municipal partners informing us of issues in this
regard.
Flood Infrastructure and Flood Risk
Due to the amount of woody debris in the valleys after the ice storm, Flood Infrastructure staff
carried out visual inspections of all flood control structures to ensure that no debris blockages
existed which could potentially exacerbate flooding during future rainfall events. Five channels
were found to be in need of tree removals to restore flood capacity. These include: Bolton
Channel, Sheppard Channel, Yonge/York Mills Channel, Woodbridge Channel and Mimico
Malton Channel. Debris removals are currently underway, and /or the local municipality has
been notified where debris is on municipal property (e.g., Yonge /York Mills Channel south of
Donino Avenue).
551
Woody debris within a valley is part of the natural system, and does not typically increase flood
risks unless several pieces of debris mesh together and create blockages. This would most
often occur at points within the valley where there is a culvert, small bridge or bridge pier that
snags debris. Another issue may be if woody debris were to locally deflect river flows toward a
bank causing erosion near municipal infrastructure such as sanitary sewers or bridge
abutments. In many cases, smaller pieces of debris may pass through culverts /crossings
during rainfall events without causing blockages.
TRCA manages debris within flood control channels, however staff does not actively manage
debris within or along natural watercourses; this activity is conducted by the municipality. In
most municipalities where TRCA owns valleylands, management agreements have been
developed that allow the municipality to manage TRCA -owned valleylands on behalf of TRCA.
For example, Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation manages TRCA valleylands within the
City of Toronto. After the ice storm, several municipalities contacted TRCA for assistance with
debris removal in the valleys to mitigate the impacts of debris during future rainfall events, as
well as for the spring freshet in 2014. Many municipalities are still in the process of surveying
the valleylands (hindered due to current ice conditions and limited access) and as a result the
extent of the potential flood risk due to debris in the valleys is unknown at this time. A clearer
picture will emerge over the coming weeks. TRCA staff is currently working with several
municipalities to establish criteria for when it is appropriate to remove debris due to a potential
flood hazard and when it is appropriate to leave the debris as part of the natural system. It is
clear, after discussing the issues with several municipalities that new management agreements
need to be created where none exist, and clarification of responsibilities under the existing
management agreements is warranted.
Permit Requirements for Debris Removal
The goal of TRCA is to facilitate the municipalities in their debris removal programs and to
mitigate the risks due to flooding to the greatest extent possible. After the ice storm, TRCA
Planning and Development staff and Ecologists developed the "Permit Screening for
Proponent Use - Debris Removal for Culvert Maintenance ". The protocol allows for a
self- assessment and no TRCA permit is required under specific circumstances provided that
certain best management practices are implemented. The protocol is included in Attachment 3
and is also available on TRCA's website. Staff has also been in contact with the Ministry of
Natural Resources to discuss a protocol for managing redside dace concerns during the "Ice
Storm debris clean -up phase" leading into spring 2014. TRCA has also noted to proponents
that these activities are described under the Fisheries Act Self- Assessment Process. It is the
opinion of TRCA that "Serious Harm" to fish will be minimized by following the criteria and best
management practices defined in the exemption protocol.
For situations that do not fall within this permit exemption Protocol, consultation with TRCA is
recommended. Under this circumstance, the information requirements and review procedures
are outlined in TRCA's Debris Jam Removal Protocol that is to be followed when submitting a
permit application www .trca.on.ca /dotAsset /40059.pdf. Where permits are required, TRCA staff
is committed to expediting the review and approval of such applications. Where the works are
not considered "major ", TRCA staff will provide the proponent with an approved permit through
its delegated approvals process.
552
Damages
The Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre operated under normal conditions during the ice
storm and no additional resources were required to manage the event. The estimated cost to
remove woody debris from the flood control channels identified above is $75,000 (although this
estimate may increase if debris continues to accumulate). Table 1, below, summarizes the
estimated costs to date by region.
Table 1: Estimated Costs for Debris Removal in Flood Control Channels by Region (as of
January 28, 2013)
Region
Estimated Costs
Peel Region
$50,000 + unknown costs for Mimico /Malton Channel
Durham Region
n/a
City of Toronto
$10,000 + unknown costs for Sheppard Channel
York Region
$15,000
Total Estimate
$75,000 + unknown costs
3. Parks and Culture Facilities
Some of the greatest impacts during the ice storm were to Parks and Culture facilities. With the
exception of Albion Hills Conservation Area, Black Creek Pioneer Village (for events only) and
Kortright Centre for Conservation, all Parks and Culture facilities are closed for the season.
Closed areas have been marked with signage and information has been posted on each
facility's web page to inform the public of the current status. The following summarizes the
events and impacts at each facility:
Kortright Centre for Conservation lost power from December 22 -31. Staff worked around the
clock over the week (on site 24 /hrs. each day), taking shifts to be on fire watch, as the fire
suppression system went off line. Staff had a generator running to keep the emergency lights,
fridges and freezer going, as well as small heaters to try to keep some warmth in the building
for the plumbing lines. The generator failed on December 29th and power was restored to the
main building (Visitor Centre) on December 31 st. A few of the plumbing lines along the exterior
wall in the kitchen froze, as well as in the pump house, and have since been repaired.
Damages to trees around the property were assessed by staff and hazard trails were closed.
Weekend programming on January 4 -5th, as well as January 11 -12th, were cancelled.
Albion Hills Conservation Area lost power for approximately three days. Power was restored
for a short period of time and was then lost for three more days. Before the storm,
cross - country ski trails were ready to open to the public on Boxing Day, however these trails
had to remain closed until January 11th due to damage to trees and hazardous trails. A large
amount of damage to trees was reported as well as damage to the Chalet due to the weight of
heavy ice cover on the roof. An engineer was called in to assess damages to the Chalet, and
recommended a roof assessment be completed. This assessment has been scheduled - not
complete at the time of writing of this report. TRCA parks and forestry crews have been working
on repair /recovery "on the ground ". Over 30 days of work by TRCA staff (estimated) will be
required to completely mitigate hazards and clean up damage. Contractors will also be
required.
553
Boyd Conservation Area lost power to the back half of the park. A transformer and pole will
require repair and replacement. PowerStream is responsible for the cost for the transformer
and power lines, however TRCA is responsible for the pole replacement /installation. A
contractor was called in to clear some trees and branches affecting lines, and staff will continue
to work on repair /recovery "on the ground ". Approximately 20 work days by TRCA staff
(estimated) will be required. Contractors will also be required.
Heart Lake Conservation Area was hit very hard in terms of damage to trees, but did not lose
power and there was no damage to buildings. It is estimated that it will take over 30 days to
clear the damage. A large number of limbs came right down, therefore the initial assessment is
that the majority (about 75 -80 %) of the work can be done by TRCA crews and professional
danger tree contractors will be required for the remaining work. TRCA forestry crews have
cleared roadways within the park for EMS accessibility. Treetop Trekking has done an initial
assessment and noted that there is damage to tree tops. A detailed assessment will be done
early spring to determine if any sections of the course will need to be re- routed.
Glen Haffy Conservation Area lost power a few times over the days following the storm. A
contractor was called in to clear the lines in order for Hydro One to restore power. Tree
damage is not as extensive as some other areas, but will require TRCA crew work and
contractors. It is estimated approximately 15 days work by TRCA staff will be required for both
Glen Haffy Conservation Area and the Headwaters Trout Ponds property.
Glen Rouge Campground will require approximately five days of TRCA staff time for
repair /recovery "on the ground ". Contractors will also be required. The City of Toronto has not
cleared any damage in the exterior parking lot as yet. No damage to buildings was incurred.
Petticoat Creek Conservation Area will require approximately five days of TRCA staff time for
repair /recovery "on the ground ". Contractors will also be required. No damage to buildings was
incurred.
Bruce's Mill Conservation Area lost power to the Chalet and Sugar Shack, however did not
lose power to the shop, gatehouse, pumphouse and pool centre. No damage to buildings was
incurred. Roadways have been cleared for EMS accessibility. It is estimated approximately six
days work by TRCA staff will be required for repair /recovery. A contractor will also be required.
Bathurst Glen Golf Course lost power to the shop and clubhouse, however did not lose power
at house and range building. No damage to buildings incurred. Damage to trees was not as
extensive as other areas. It is estimated three days work by TRCA staff is required. Contractors
will also be required.
554
Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) experienced a number of revenue losses due to the
storm. A large education group cancelled their pre- booked visit December 20th as a result of
weather reports. A number of calls for cancellations to the December 21 st Christmas by
Lamplight program were received and the Christmas dinners on December 22nd were
cancelled by BCPV. Staff contacted customers, and any staff not yet working were advised to
stay home. BCPV lost some power on December 26 -28th and power to the Black Creek North
property was severed as a result of fallen trees immediately following the storm. Damage to
infrastructure included some damage to four historic buildings, as well as fence lines hit by
falling trees and limbs. Building checks were implemented and steps were taken to prevent
plumbing lines from freezing. Damages to heating /cooling units as well as some emergency
lighting were encountered. Business Services experienced a high volume of food spoilage.
Repair /recovery of BCPV continues; since the Village is closed to the public, staff is able to
work daily without overtime on clean -up activities. Contractors will also be required at this
facility.
Damages
Approximately 80% of the damages to Parks and Culture facilities were due to fallen trees.
Woody debris and hazardous tree removals are estimated to cost $646,000. Initial estimates of
insured damages (including repairs to building structures, plumbing, spoiled food etc.) are
$180,000 to date. Additional costs may be identified once all assessments, including structural
engineering reports, have been received.
A new generator for the Village (that will be able to mitigate many of the issues experienced
during the ice storm) was purchased and installed, however testing was not complete at the
time of the storm. The generator is now operational. Several initiatives are underway that
address the greater issue of electricity supply in the GTA. Attachment 6 provides an overview
of TRCA's involvement in this regard.
A summary of the damage estimates to Parks and Culture facilities by region are included in
Table 2, below.
Table 2: Summary of Damage Estimates to Parks and Culture Facilities by Region (as of
January 28, 2013)
Region
Costs Potentially Covered by Insurance
Tree Removal Costs
Peel Region
$50,200
$389,240
Durham Region
n/a
$33,077
City of Toronto
$94,442
$185,264
York Region
$35,500
$38,077
Total Estimate
1 $180,142
$645,659
555
4. Conservation Lands
Passive use trails
Following the ice storm, TRCA Conservation Lands staff conducted cursory assessments of the
various passive -use properties that TRCA owns and manages. Based on the results of these
assessments, all trails on passive use properties have been closed until the appropriate hazard
tree abatement can take place. "Trails Closed Due To Hazardous Conditions" signs have been
posted at all public access points and a similar message is posted at several places on the
TRCA website. The one exception was for the East Duff ins Headwaters properties. As there
were no imminent hazardous conditions within the East Duffins Headwaters properties, save for
a few branches down on trails, the closure of these trails was not warranted. For all
passive -use lands, the standard operating roles and procedures under TRCA's Hazard Tree
Policy continue to apply. Passive -use properties and trails will be reopened once all tree
hazards have been assessed and abated. The TRCA website will be updated as trails reopen.
Based on TRCA's Hazard Tree Policy, passive -use properties must be assessed on a biennial
basis. It will therefore take two years to know exactly the full extent of ice storm related damage
to TRCA trails. Passive -use properties and trails will be reopened once all tree hazards have
been assessed and abated. The TRCA website will be updated as trails reopen. The full extent
and cost of hazard tree abatement on passive -use trails will not be known until all trails have
been assessed. Based on TRCA's Hazard Tree Policy, passive -use properties must be
assessed on a biennial basis. However, given the potential increase in hazardous trees due to
the ice storm, TRCA will be expediting the assessment of passive -use trails in 2014. It is
expected to take 6 -8 months to complete the assessments and hazard abatements on all of our
passive -use trails. This work will require some reallocation of internal resources and some
additional resources. For example, one of TRCA's three field staff crews (consisting of two staff
members) will be reallocated full -time to trails assessments and one additional crew will be
hired. Conservation Lands staff will also be pursuing opportunities to partner with trail stewards
and volunteers to assist in reaching the 6 -8 month completion target. It is important to note that
this program will be implemented on passive -use trails that are formally approved by TRCA
(through Management Plans or Master Plans) and will not include informal trails that TRCA
does not currently manage.
Damages
It is estimated that the total cost to conduct the hazard tree management plans for passive trails
will be approximately $675,000. This estimate includes additional time required to survey and
remove trees due to the storm and is a high level estimate based on the areas inspected to
date. Further survey work may lead to a more refined estimate. This is part of the regular
budget, however some costs allocated to 2015 work will be brought forward in 2014 to expedite
services. This is also a separate cost from the debris /hazard removal costs at active use
facilities which are listed in Section 3 above. Costs directly related to the ice storm (e.g., fence
repairs) are assumed to be covered under TRCAs insurance policy and therefore these figures
are included in the total damage estimates provided in the Financial Details section of this staff
report. Both the insured costs and hazard tree management costs associated with
conservation lands (passive use trails) are listed in Table 3 below:
556
Table 3: Summary of Cost Estimates for Conservation Lands by Region (as of January 28,
2013)
Region
Costs Potentially Covered by
Insurance
Hazard Tree Management
(2014 -2015)
Peel Region
$10,000
$175,000
Durham Region
$5,000
$315,000
City of Toronto
n/a
n/a
York Region
$10,000
$185,000
Total Estimate
$25,000
$675,000*
*1/2 of the estimated costs are associated with increased costs due to the Ice Storm and 1/2
are associated with work already budgeted for 2014.
5. TRCA Rental and Office Properties
Impacts to TRCA Offices
Fortunately, the ice storm occurred during a time of year when most staff was away from the
offices due to the holiday season (December 20 -31). As a result, disruptions for staff were kept
to a minimum. However, there were many staff members who came into work on December
23rd and 24th, and in the case of the Downsview Office employees, arrived to find the offices
without power. There is a generator at the Downsview Office however it is run by Parc
Downsview Park Inc. (property owner) and only provides partial power to select areas of the
building. The Downsview Office was closed and staff was advised to work from home or at
Head Office.
The generator at Head Office worked as needed (this generator is also an important
component of the redundancy plan for flood forecasting and warning operations). A plan for
emergency fuel delivery with a supplier has been established, staff is trained on the operation
of the equipment and bi- annual testing and maintenance is conducted. In addition, staff test the
generator monthly.
Impacts to TRCA's Tenants
Across the TRCA rental portfolio (which includes 125 residential, farm and commercial units) a
total of 47 properties were affected by the storm. Thirty were affected with power outages that
lasted between 24 hours and nine days. Tenants were able to communicate with TRCA
Property Services staff with minimal confusion, and were attended to in a timely manner. TRCA'
s contracted emergency after hours service was available and dealt with after -hours issues
according to the established protocol. Of the 47 affected tenants, two were displaced and
incurred hotel costs out of necessity, for a total of five nights. These costs will be borne by
TRCA as, in these specific cases, power outages were caused by the failure of TRCA
infrastructure.
Number of Tenants affected by:
• Power outages: 2
• Power outages and plumbing repairs: 17
• Power outages and hazardous trees: 8
• Power outages, hazardous trees, and plumbing repairs: 3
• Fallen or hazardous trees: 17
557
Impacts to our Neighbours
Between December 21 st and January 6th, TRCA Property Services received 118 notifications
from members of the public of hazardous tree issues on, or in proximity to, their private
property stemming from TRCA -owned lands. TRCA has followed up and mitigated or fixed the
issue(s) identified at approximately 95 of the locations, and are in the process of attending to
the remaining 23 sites.
Damages
Aside from plumbing breaks or leaks due to cold weather and power outages, physical damage
to TRCA's residential rental portfolio was limited to five occurrences ranging from damaged
vinyl siding to a broken window or leaking roof. All occurrences were minimal in nature, and
have been repaired or replaced as of the date of this report. All hazard tree issues on rental
properties have been attended to, and any identified hazard has been removed. The cost of this
work to date is approximately $29,000. This cost is solely to remove the imminent hazard, and
does not reflect ongoing clean -up costs, which are in the process of being estimated. A
breakdown of the expenses to date (related to rental properties) by region is provided in Table
4, below:
Table 4: Summary of Expenses to date for Rental Properties by Region (as of January 28,
2013)
Region
Costs Potentially Covered
by Insurance
Woody Debris and Hazard Tree
Removal Costs
(Where Not Covered by Insurance)
Peel Region
$2,226
$339
Durham Region
$1,947
n/a
City of Toronto
$9,288
$396
York Region
$11,738
$3,446
Total Estimate
$25,000
$4,180
6. TRCA Communications
One of the most critical factors of success for any operation is effective communication. This is
true during both emergency and non - emergency situations. TRCA has an existing Corporate
Communications Plan that lays out a process for engaging Marketing and Communications
staff to assist with public information items and media relations. Subject matter experts have
been identified across the organization who will be called on to assist the Supervisor, Media
Management when required. Over the years, TRCA has proved to be a reliable source for the
media and TRCA is often the first agency called upon to speak to environmental and flood
related issues. Over the course of the ice storm, the Chief Flood Duty Officer conducted
several media interviews to provide information on the flood potential due to the warmer
temperatures and melting snow (fortunately during this event there was minimal flood
potential). TRCA is also frequently called upon by media to provide information on our
environmental and education programs. As information providers, TRCA's media
communication system is quite effective during both emergency and non - emergency
situations. TRCA is also quite effective at creating general information for the public about
regular program operations (e.g., information about TRCA's parks facilities, special events and
on -going projects).
558
Service to TRCA's Patrons
In reviewing the ice storm event from a communications perspective, a few areas were
identified that need improvement. Parks and Culture staff did an extraordinary job of notifying
patrons of event closures for scheduled events (i.e., Christmas dinners) and contacted patrons
directly where they had signed up for an event and provided their contact information. Parks
facilities that were closed due to the storm were signed at the gates in a timely manner. The
corporate system, whereby service disruptions outside of normal operating hours are posted
on our website was noticeably slow. Marketing and Communications staff will be developing a
separate communication plan for service disruptions to address this issue. In addition, the
system of notifying TRCA's Chief Executive Officer, senior management and Marketing and
Communications staff of the current status of services will be re- examined to improve the flow
of information and to ensure timely, accurate and consistent information. The goal of the new
plan will be to improve the experiences of TRCA's clients and will also improve information
sharing with TRCA's municipal partners.
Staff Notifications
Another issue that came to light during the development of the storm was that communicating
developing issues with members of staff was very difficult, and in many cases did not happen.
A formal process is required to notify staff of changes to work expectations due to emergencies
(such as an ice storm) that effects power at buildings, creates localized issues (such as road
blockages limiting access to buildings), health issues (such as flu pandemic) or other such
issues or incidents. Ultimately the health and safety of staff is paramount and many risks could
be avoided by communicating to staff that it is not necessary to work at their regular place of
business due to an unforeseen event. The new employee communications plan will allow for
communication to a large number of staff in a timely manner and will lay out the criteria for
when to enact the plan and by whom.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Table 5: Summary of Estimated Costs by Operational Area
Operational Area
Estimated Costs
Not Insured
Potentially
Insured
Lost Revenue - Black Creek Pioneer Village
$45,000.00
Lost Revenue - All Parks and Culture Facilities (not
including BCPV)
$32,000.00
Capital Costs - Black Creek Pioneer Village
$49,000.00
Capital Costs - All Parks and Culture Facilities (not
including BCPV)
$48,000.00
Capital Costs - Conservation Lands
$25,000.00
Capital Costs - Rental Properties
$25,000.00
Debris Removal - Active Use Trails, Public Areas
within Parks
$646,000.00
Debris Removal - Passive Use Trails
$340,000 **
Debris Removal - Flood Control Channels
$75,000.00
Debris Removal - Rental Properties
$4,000.00
Total Costs *
$1.1 Million
$224,000
559
* *Total costs for debris removal on passive use trails was estimated to be $675,000, however
only 1/2 of this estimate is associated with costs due to the ice storm.
Insured Losses:
Based on a preliminary consultation with TRCA's insurer, direct damages to TRCA insured
assets /infrastructure due to the storm will be covered under TRCA's insurance policy. In order
for debris removal to be covered it must be associated with physical damage to insured
property and /or associated infrastructure. For example, if a tree falls on an insured building the
cost to remove the tree is covered. However, if a tree falls on trails or across a parking lot it is
not automatically covered. Staff is currently in discussions with the insurer to clarify which
claims will be covered in this regard. Based on an initial assessment of the types of damages
incurred, TRCA staff estimates that approximately 80 -90% of the damages to TRCA rental
properties will be covered by insurance. In contrast, only 12% of damages to Parks and
Cultures facilities are expected to be covered due to the high costs of woody debris /hazard tree
removals that did not impact infrastructure. Conservation lands damages, for the most part, are
uninsurable (with only 4% of the costs relating to damaged infrastructure, such as fences).
Removal of debris from flood control channels is not insurable. When all damages are totalled
across all program areas, insured damages equal approximately 20% of the costs incurred due
to the ice storm.
Funding Requirements
Estimates of damages incurred by TRCA due to the 2013 ice storm will be provided to the
regions of Durham, Peel and York, and the City of Toronto for inclusion in their respective
requests for provincial and /or federal funding. Should provincial and /or federal funding be
announced, TRCA will request extra assistance from the municipalities for the amounts
provided.
Report prepared by: Laurian Farrell, extension 5601
Emails: Ifarrell @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Laurian Farrell, extension 5601
Emails: Ifarrell @trca.on.ca
Date: January 10, 2014
Attachments: 6
560
Attachment 1
Overview of the Ontario Disaster Relief Assistance Program ( ODRAP)
Information provided by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing on the ODRAP program
can be found by going to the following webpage:
http:// www .mah.gov.on.ca /Pagel579.aspx. The following provides an overview of the
program.
The Ontario Disaster Relief Assistance Program ( ODRAP) is an assistance program designed to
help municipalities, individuals, farmers, small business and non - profit organizations get back
on their feet after an unexpected natural disaster (such as a severe windstorm, tornado or
flood). It is intended to cover the costs of returning essential items to pre- disaster condition for
people who have suffered damage in designated disaster areas. ODRAP is not intended to be
an alternative or a substitute for adequate insurance coverage.
• Private component: Individuals, homeowners, farmers, small business enterprises and
non - profit organizations. Funds are raised by the community and may be matched up to
2:1 by the Province of Ontario.
• Public component: Financial assistance may be provided by the Province to affected
municipalities for disaster response and recovery. The program provides financial
assistance within the declared disaster area to restore damaged public infrastructure
and /or private property to pre- disaster condition, when the cost of restoration exceeds
the financial capacity of the affected individuals, municipality and community at large.
For a municipality to be eligible for ODRAP, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
(herein referred to as "the Minister ") must make a declaration of a disaster area for the
purposes of ODRAP. Municipalities are not automatically entitled to receive financial assistance
when declaring a local "emergency" under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection
Act (EMCPA).
Municipal Criteria /Steps to Qualify as a Disaster Area
1. Municipal council must request a declaration of a disaster area for public assistance
within 14 days of the onset of the disaster.
2. In the event of a natural disaster, municipalities are expected to have funds available for
use in unexpected events.
3. Losses must be so extensive that they exceed the municipality's financial resources
(i.e., damages must exceed four per cent of the municipality's tax base before qualifying
for provincial funding - does not include insured damages).
When multiple municipalities are affected, each council has to make a separate request for a
declaration of a disaster area for public assistance. The Minister may declare one disaster area
across municipal boundaries.
The Provincial Disaster Assessment Team (PDAT) may be activated to provide the Province's
own assessment of the scale of the disaster impacts and the need for financial assistance to the
Minister
561
Municipalities within the declared disaster area may receive repayment /reimbursement of up to
100 per cent of eligible costs for uninsured municipal damage associated with a disaster.
Municipal Disaster Information Report
A municipal disaster information report submitted by the municipality assists the Minister to
determine the appropriateness of ODRAP, and permits early consideration of financial
assistance for immediate needs related to emergency response and clean -up. The following
information is required:
• extent of municipal damage suffered, including expenses incurred by other
municipalities which support response operations or act as a host community;
• preliminary cost estimate to restore, replace and /or repair damage to municipal property
and infrastructure to pre- disaster condition;
• other information council believes is pertinent (e.g., conservation authority reports,
Environment Canada reports, etc.);
• the package should include newspaper clippings, photographs and other documentary
evidence where available.
The Minister may also consider:
• severity of impact based on scientific evidence (i.e., F1 /F5 tornado);
• current financial capacity, debt ratio and capital commitments of the affected
municipality;
• local economic impact, e.g. tourism and ability to recover without provincial assistance;
and
• future financial pressures resulting from response and recovery costs.
562
Attachment 2
The Urban Forest: Vulnerability and Response
The severity of tree damage is largely determined by the amount of accumulated ice, the
degree of wind exposure and the duration of the storm. However, susceptibility to damage is
strongly influenced by tree characteristics, including weak branch junctures (indicated by
included bark), decaying or dead branches, tree height and diameter, increased surface area of
lateral branches, broad crowns, unbalanced crowns, restricted and unbalanced root systems,
and shallow rooting. Tree species vary in their ability to withstand ice loading and associated
stress. For example, species such as Siberian elm and silver maple are vulnerable to damage
due to the relatively low strength and brittle nature of their wood. In contrast, many conifer
species (e.g. white spruce) are resistant to significant damage from ice accumulation due to
their conical growth form and narrow crowns. Tree species with coarse branch structure (e.g.
black walnut and Kentucky coffee -tree) typically accumulate less ice and are therefore less
prone to branch failure. Finally, tree species that exhibit slow growth rates and tolerance of
natural stress are more likely to withstand the combined affects of freezing precipitation and
strong wind.
The response of trees to ice storm events can be influenced by management practices, notably
the frequency and quality of maintenance. For example, improper pruning practices can leave
unbalanced crowns that are prone to failure. Infrequent pruning and lack of structural
maintenance can lead to weak branch structures and ultimately increased vulnerability to
damage. Opportunities for damage prevention begin in the early stages of a tree's life. Nursery
stock can be pruned in a manner that cultivates a desirable growth form that is more resistant
to stress. Following tree planting, frequent pruning cycles can ensure that the necessary
structural pruning is performed during the first 5 to 10 years of establishment. In addition,
long -term tree maintenance, strategic site and species selection and careful urban forest
planning can minimize damage to trees, and nearby infrastructure, during ice storms.
Damaged trees may require pruning in the immediate and long -term in order to address safety
hazards and correct any weak growth arising from ice storm injuries. However, many damaged
trees will recover and produce new growth following storm disturbance. Thus, careful
assessment and a degree of patience can ensure that resilient trees are not removed
unnecessarily.
Proactive Measures
Trees deliver valuable environmental, economic and social services in support of a healthy,
livable city region. As such, the urban forest is a vital component of the Toronto region's
infrastructure system. Like other forms of infrastructure, leafy green infrastructure requires
dedicated investment and maintenance in order to perform at optimum levels. It is important to
note that some urban forest damage is likely inevitable in an extreme weather event. However,
the extent of damage and related economic repercussions may be minimized as a result of
proactive investments in regular maintenance, strategic planning, monitoring and research, and
community stewardship programs.
563
In 2012 TRCA united with organizations from across the Greater Toronto Area to form Trees for
Life. Led by Mark Cullen - expert gardener, radio and television host, and Toronto Star
columnist - Trees for Life members have committed to increasing the tree canopy in the
Toronto region by leveraging existing resources and raising new funds in support of tree
planting, maintenance and public education efforts. Member organizations include Landscape
Ontario, Trees Ontario, Toronto Parks and Trees Foundation, the City of Toronto, LEAF, the
Ontario Urban Forest Council, Toronto Park People, and the Toronto Botanical Gardens. This
initiative is generating shared momentum among both public and private agencies, facilitating
the alignment of efforts and resources for greater impact, and producing tangible outcomes
including tree planting events and public education programs. The fundraising success of
several partner agencies, notably the Toronto Parks and Trees Foundation, is now generating
critical funds to complement the strategic urban forest management efforts of municipal
partners. In addition, TRCA serves as a Steering Committee member of the Green Infrastructure
Ontario Coalition (GIO), an alliance of organizations working together to gain greater support
for green infrastructure across Ontario. Through a range of strategic initiatives and
partnerships, GIO is actively pursuing policy improvements at the provincial level in order to
foster more resilient green infrastructure systems, including urban forests. In support of these
two nested initiatives, TRCA is providing essential capacity building and administrative support
by serving as the secretariat for both Trees for Life and GIO.
TRCA is also leading a number of applied research and monitoring efforts, which can help to
ensure that the increasing demand for the services provided by green infrastructure in TRCA's
jurisdiction can be met even in the face of increasing disturbance and uncertainty. These
include the following:
• TRCA is working together with its partner municipalities and neighbouring conservation
authorities to conduct urban forest studies that quantify the structure and function of the
urban canopy and establish baselines for future monitoring. The results of these studies
will inform comprehensive evaluations of damage caused by extreme weather events,
future vulnerability assessments, as well as strategic urban forest planning and
management.
• As a member of the Peel Region Urban Forest Working Group, TRCA is co- developing
decision support tools that can guide strategic tree planting and establishment efforts in
Peel and across the GTA.
• Together with the Region of Peel, the cities of Brampton and Mississauga, and the Town
of Caledon, TRCA is undertaking a climate change risk and vulnerability assessment
that will evaluate the potential impacts of future extreme weather events on the natural
heritage system and the urban forest.
564
Attachment 3
Permit Screening - for Proponent Use: Debris Removal for Culvert Maintenance
PERMIT SCREENING - FOR PROPONENT USE
Debris Removal for Culvert Maintenance
Required for Ontario Regulation 166106 Permit Applications
INTERIM - January 27, 2014
The Proponent or the TRCA Planner shall screen all inquiries regarding permit requirements for
Debris Removal for Culvert Maintenance to determine if an Ontario Regulation 166/06 Permit is
required. Please consult with TRCA staff for clarification, as required.
These activities are described under the Fisheries Act Self- Assessment Process. It is the
opinion of TRCA that by following the criteria and best management practices defined on
Page 2, risk of causing "Serious Harm" to fish is minimal. Considerations for debris
removal under the Endangered Species Act have been provided by the Ontario Ministry of
Natural Resources (MNR) and are also provided on Page 2.
It should be noted that review under the TRCA permitting process does not relieve the
proponent from seeking approvals from other agencies, such as MNR or the Ministry of the
Environment, as required.
Criteria for TRCA Permit Exemptions
Yes
No
1
The debris accumulation poses a risk to culvert infrastructure or may cause
flooding of the roadway, private property or other public infrastructure
2
The debris accumulation is within 10m of an existing crossing structure
3
The debris accumulation is a result of recent flooding or storm events OR there
is no accumulation of sediment behind the debris
4
Flow diversion is not required
5
Vehicular or construction equipment access and operation will be restricted to
existing roadways, or formal trails of sufficient width to accommodate access
6
Access to the bed and banks will be on foot only to facilitate cutting and
collection as necessary
7
No access to the bed or banks of the watercourse is required by vehicles or
construction equipment
8
Debris will be removed from the site (not repositioned on the floodplain) and
properly disposed of or reused /mulched.
9
Woody blockages by trees or shrubs still rooted in the bank will be cut to ensure
that the root structure remains in the bank. No grubbing of the bank will occur.
Your project must meet all of the above criteria to be exempt from permit review
and approval by TRCA. Best management practices should be followed as
provided on Page 2 of this screening checklist.
If your project does not fit within the criteria described above, a TRCA permit may be required. The
TRCA Debris Jam Clearance Protocol TRCA http: / /trca.on.ca /dotAsset /40059.pdf should be followed when
submitting the permit application so that any additional requirements for the protection of the terrestrial and
aquatic systems (such as access, bank erosion, restoration if necessary, etc.) can be determined. The
permit application can be found at http: / /trca.on.ca /dotAsset /166903.pdf._TRCA recognizes that there may
be risks to flooding and erosion related to the debris jam and in these circumstances, will expedite review.
565
Objective
This guideline has been prepared to identify when and where the removal of woody debris from
within a TRCA regulated area DOES NOT require project review or approval as outlined in the
Debris Jam Clearance Protocol. This guideline is prepared to facilitate routine maintenance of
culverts and bridges at road, driveway or formal trail crossings of watercourses, where recent
woody debris accumulations are impeding flow conveyance and affecting flooding or impacting
the integrity of the structure through flow deflection.
TRCA does not support removal of woody debris within watercourses, floodplains or other
natural areas where there is no imminent risk to existing infrastructure, life or property. Woody
debris in streams, on the forest floor or standing in a woodland area is an integral part of the
ecology of natural systems, supporting nutrient cycling, soil formation, succession, habitat, and
biodiversity. However, where woody debris accumulations occur, and threats to urban
infrastructure may result, regular inspection and removal as necessary is supported.
Best Management Practices
The following should be followed for all debris removal projects to minimize impacts to natural
features:
1. Be advised that these sites are hazardous; as such access to these areas must be planned
and executed according to established Occupational Health and Safety practices regarding
working around water.
2. Removals should occur during dry weather and low flow conditions whenever possible.
3. Debris should be removed as soon as possible, once noted, to avoid large accumulations.
4. Winter accumulations should be removed prior to March 31 when possible, to minimize
disturbance to aquatic spring migrations and spawning, and
5. Spring /summer accumulations should be removed after July 1 (in- stream removals) or after
August 1 (for cutting of live growth) when possible.
** Please note that the transportation, disposal or reuse of the woody material should follow the
regulations set out by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency for Emerald Ash Borer or Asian
Long Horned Beetle as applicable.
NOTES FROM MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES - Endangered Species Act:
Review under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA), is the responsibility of the proponent
and is provided here for information only. All consultation must be directly between the
proponent and MNR. Under the ESA, many aquatic species receive species protection and
habitat protection (Section 9 and 10 of the ESA, respectively). Redside dace is a species found
within a number of watersheds draining into Lake Ontario within the Greater Toronto Area. Any
in or near -water activities that may impact redside dace, or other species protected under the
ESA, require review by the MNR to ensure that the activities will not be in contravention of
Section 9 or 10 of the ESA.
566
It is important to note that woody debris is a critical habitat component for redside cace
and many other aquatic species, and is integral to aquatic ecosystems. Woody debris
removal activities should be limited to those sites that are a threat to infrastructure or
pose a risk to public safety (e.g. flooding).
Given the urgency associated with the removal of woody debris that may be impacting
infrastructure and / or public safety following recent severe weather events, MNR will work with
municipalities to ensure timely review of debris removal activities under the ESA. To expedite
review, municipalities are urged to contact MNR Aurora District with the following information:
• Municipal contact information (name, position, contact details)
• A map of debris - removal locations and UTM coordinates in locations identified to be
the habitat of fedside dace and upstream of these areas (see regional redside dace
screening maps)
• Timelines associated with debris removal activities
• Information pertaining to how debris removal activities meet the criteria outlined
above by TRCA
Information should be sent directly to Emily Funnell, Species at Risk Biologist, MNR Aurora
District at emily.funnell(@-ontario.ca (subject line to read Municipal Debris Removal for Culvert
Maintenance).
567
Attachment 4
Resolution Number 1
GTA Mayors and Chairs January 17, 2014
Whereas On December 22, the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) and other parts of the Province of
Ontario suffered an extreme weather event
And whereas during this event, a severe ice storm affected many of the municipalities in the
GTA, resulting in loss of electricity, road and sidewalk blockages, thousands of downed and
damaged trees, and widespread disruption to municipal services and the lives of residents and
the operations of businesses
And whereas those municipalities have incurred significant costs to respond to the immediate
public safety issues
And whereas those municipalities are facing a costly and lengthy recovery period to deal with
the debris and damage to the tree canopy as a consequence of the ice storm
And whereas many municipalities through the Province have applied to the Province for
financial assistance through ODRAP
And whereas there is concern that the ODRAP program does not adequately recognize and
respond to the full cost of extreme weather events, especially in a time where extreme weather
is expected to be more frequent and intense due to the impacts of climate change
And whereas on January 17 in response to the storm, the GTA Mayors and Chairs came
together in a coordinated approach to asking for financial assistance
Therefore be it resolved that
1. The Provincial and Federal governments share equally in this disaster with
municipalities by each funding 1/3 of the full cost of response and ongoing recovery
from the ice storm for affected municipalities.
2. That the Provincial and Federal governments treat all applicable municipalities equally
and equitably.
3. That the Provincial and Federal governments recognize the urgency of this matter and
provide a response by March 1, 2014.
4. That this resolution be sent to the Premier of Ontario, the Prime Minister of Canada, the
local Members of Provincial Parliament and Members of Parliament, the Association of
Municipalities of Ontario and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.
•
Resolution Number 2
GTA Mayors and Chairs January 17, 2014
The Provincial and Federal governments establish new programs and expand existing
programs to address disaster mitigation involving forestry, erosion control, winter storms, tree
canopy, and other severe storm events, that reflect the reality of climate change and such
programs to include funding for rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure to mitigate this and
future environmental and storm event impacts.
That this resolution be sent to the Premier of Ontario, the Prime Minister of Canada, the local
Members of Provincial Parliament and Members of Parliament, the Association of Municipalities
of Ontario and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.
569
Attachment 5 - Figure 1: Location of TRCA Properties
� H•
6 S
+e
t$ ss Le �r
.` `o - I m .1a
_f IF
mLg
U = m
U LL 'U m
a
C
C 4 -
r
CC sis� e C
nom.
570
Attachment 6
Enhancing Resilience to Severe Weather and Climate Change: Assessing Risks and
Opportunities for Key Elements of Ontario's Electrical
GTA's economy is fundamentally dependent on well- functioning electricity systems. Electricity
supply can impact the delivery of other critical infrastructure and services, supporting public
health and safety and economic activity. This dependency makes a strong case for improving
our understanding of vulnerability of the electrical system to severe weather events and the
potential influence of climate change. Investment in programs that improve the understanding
of the risks to Ontario's transmission network as result of a changing climate and associated
extreme weather is required. National Resources Canada (NRCan) has funded two projects in
the GTA which address these issues. The projects, led by the Ontario Climate Consortium and
Toronto Hydro address the distribution and transmission components of the electricity system,
respectively. Both projects are closely coordinated with each other and outcomes from each of
the projects will be very relevant to the Canadian energy sector.
Climate Change Risk and Opportunities Assessment (TRCA and Partners)
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is working with the Ontario Climate
Consortium (OCC) and our partners: Ontario Power Authority (OPA), Ontario Ministry of
Energy, Engineers Canada, Consulting Engineers of Ontario, York University, Western
University, Risk Science International and Nodelcorp Consulting Inc. to undertake a
climate change risk and opportunities assessment with a focus on electricity
transmission infrastructure in Ontario; a vital climate sensitive component of the larger
electrical grid. The outcomes will inform similar risk assessments across Canada and
build capacity within the utility sector for future integration of climate risk assessments
into their operations.
The provincial transmission grid is a complex and spatially expansive system which
consists of a network of power lines and supports, substations, communications
systems (e.g. fault sensing protective relays) and important inter - connection points to
transfer electricity from points of generation to lower voltage distribution systems, and
inter - connections with other provincial or state grids. Each of these elements of the
transmission system are uniquely sensitive to climate and weather conditions and can
respond differently to different extreme weather thresholds.
The project will serve to build capacity in the transmission sector in order to support the
long -term incorporation of adaptation planning into overall efforts focused on
strengthening the resilience and sustainability of the electricity system. This project will
result in a facilitated climate change risk and opportunity assessment that produces
highly defensible results and lays the groundwork for further analogous studies in the
electricity sector in Ontario and elsewhere in Canada.
2. Electricity Distribution Risk Assessment (Toronto Hydro and Partners)
While the project described above focuses on transmission, understanding risk to the
electrical distribution system is equally important. Toronto Hydro is leading a project
that focuses on distribution in the electrical sector, in partnership with the City of
Toronto's Weather Wise Partnership.
571
RES. #A235 /13 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011 -2015
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duff ins Creek Watershed
City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, CFN 48944.
Acquisition of property located to the south of Bayly Street and west of
Church Street South in the City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of
Durham, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for 2011- 2015 ", Flood
Plain and Conservation Component, Duff ins Creek watershed.
(Executive Res. #B 163/ 13)
Moved by: Vincent Crisanti
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
THAT 2.839 hectares (7.016 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lots 15 &
16, Broken Front Concession, being Parts 11, 14, 29 and 30, Plan 40R- 22677, City of
Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, be purchased from the Corporation of the
City of Pickering;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the
lands subject to existing service easements and the reservation of three storm drainage
easements by the Corporation of the City of Pickering;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction and all reasonable
expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and
disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including obtaining needed approvals and signing and
execution of documents.
CARRIED
RES. #A236 /13 - THE LIVING CITY POLICIES FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT IN
THE WATERSHEDS OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION
AUTHORITY
To report on the results of public consultation and on revisions to the
draft of The Living City Policies, and to release the revised draft for final
public and stakeholder review.
(Executive Res. #B 164113)
Moved by: Deb Schulte
Seconded by: John Parker
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff conducted public
and stakeholder consultation on The Living City Policies draft document and have revised
the draft document based on stakeholder feedback;
572
AND WHEREAS staff committed to reporting back to the board on the results of public
consultation and on revisions to the draft document;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA release a revised draft of The Living City
Policies draft document for final public and stakeholder consultation as outlined in this
report;
THAT TRCA's municipal partners, provincial ministries, the Building Industry and Land
Development Association, environmental non - governmental agencies, watershed and
waterfront interest groups, neighbouring conservation authorities, and other stakeholders
be so advised by the CEO's Office;
AND FURTHER THAT staff return to the board later in 2014 for formal adoption of The
Living City Policies document.
CARRIED
RES. #A237/13 - PLANNING AND PERMITTING ADMINISTRATION COST RECOVERY
Cost of living adjustments for the 2014 -2015 Planning, Permitting and
Environmental Assessment Review Services Fee Schedule.
(Executive Res. #8165/13)
Moved by: Vincent Crisanti
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) established the 2012 -2013
Fees Schedule for all plan review services that aimed to achieve a 100% cost recovery
target for the development review functions within the Planning and Development
Division;
AND WHEREAS staff has committed to monitor the trends in submission demand, level of
service, revenue collection and cost recovery for the preliminary period of change in
2012 -13 and report back to the Authority and TRCA's stakeholders on the status of cost
recovery;
AND WHEREAS TRCA follows the guidelines from the provincial Ministry of Natural
Resources Policies and Procedures for Charging of Conservation Authority Fees 1997
and TRCA's Fee Policy Guideline 2009, which provides for an inflationary adjustment for
review fees every two years and provision for a comprehensive service delivery and cost
recovery assessment study;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the 2014 -2015 Fee Schedule for Planning,
Permitting and Environmental Assessment Review Services dated January 2014,
incorporating a 5% cost of living increase, be approved, to be effective on January 31,
2014;
573
THAT a comprehensive service delivery /cost recovery assessment report be provided for
the years 2012 and 2013 as soon as year end accounting numbers are available and
review is finalized with any required modifications, including adjustments to the fee
schedules, and streamlining proposals effective later in the spring of 2014;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA discuss the outcomes of the service delivery /cost recovery
assessment with our municipal partners, stakeholders and BILD (Building Industry and
Land Development Association) prior to Authority approval.
CARRIED
RES. #A238/13 - ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED PROPOSAL FOR
LEASE OF LAND
Heart Lake Conservation Area, Regional Municipality of Peel, CFN 48537.
Proposal to lease Toronto and Region Conservation Authority -owned
land located within the Heart Lake Conservation Area, City of Brampton,
Regional Municipality of Peel, to construct and operate a
telecommunications tower and associated equipment.
(Executive Res. #B 166/ 13)
Moved by: Vincent Crisanti
Seconded by: Mike Mattos
WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has been requested by
Rogers Communications Incorporated (RCI) to enter into a lease agreement for lands
located within the Heart Lake Conservation Area, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality
Peel;
WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interests of TRCA in furthering
its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate
with RCI in this instance;
THAT TRCA enter into a lease with RCI for approximately 0.003 hectares (0.007 acres),
more or less, together with use of the existing road surfaces for access and utilities, to
construct and operate a telecommunications tower and associated equipment, said land
being Part of Lot 14, Concession 2 E.H.S., City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of
Peel;
THAT the lease with RCI be premised on the following general terms and conditions:
(i) The initial term of the lease will be five (5) years, with three (3) renewal options for
successive five (5) year periods, all at the sole option of TRCA;
(ii) The lease rate shall be approximately Sixteen thousand five hundred dollars
($16,500.00) plus HST per annum, to be increased by 2% per year;
574
(iii) RCI shall be responsible for any and all approvals required for the construction and
operation of a telecommunications tower and associated equipment;
(iv) RCI shall bare the sole responsibility for any and all costs associated with the
construction and operation of a telecommunications tower and associated
equipment;
(v) Any further terms or conditions as deemed necessary or appropriate by TRCA's staff
or chosen solicitor;
THAT an archaeological review shall be completed by RCI, with any mitigative measures
being carried out to the satisfaction of the TRCA, all at the sole expense of RCI;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may
be required to implement the lease, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and
execution of any documents.
CARRIED
RES. #A239/13 - PARKS CANADA AGENCY
Rouge National Urban Park, CFN 46156. Conveyance of land for the
Rouge National Urban Park, in the cities of Toronto, Markham and
Pickering, regional municipalities of York and Durham, Rouge River
watershed.
(Executive Res. #8167/ 13 & Res. #8168/ 13)
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Raymond Chot
WHEREAS at Authority Meeting #2/12, held on March 30, 2012, the "Statement of Intent
- Towards Cooperation and Collaboration in the Establishment of a National Urban Park in
the Rouge Valley" was endorsed;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)
that it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering it's objectives, as set out in Section 20
of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Park Canada Agency (PC) in
this instance;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA lands containing 2,266 hectares (5,600
acres), more or less, and highlighted on the attached plan be conveyed to PC for the
Rouge National Urban Park, in the cities of Toronto, Markham and Pickering, regional
municipalities of York and Durham subject to the following terms and conditions;
a) the consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00;
b) PC is to be responsible for all legal, survey and other costs related to the land
conveyance;
575
c) retention by TRCA of the lands included in the tripartite agreement between City of
Toronto, Toronto Zoo and TRCA subject to refining the boundaries;
d) conveyance by TRCA of lands and /or easements for municipal infrastructure to the
cities of Toronto, Markham and Pickering and the regional municipalities of York and
Durham if requested by the municipality and subject to concurrence by PC;
e) Locust Hill School House and Cedarena properties shall be subject to further
discussions between TRCA, PC and the City of Markham prior to being conveyed;
f) any additional considerations as deemed appropriate by TRCA staff or its solicitor.
THAT said conveyance be subject to the Province of Ontario releasing its interest in the
lands conveyed by it to TRCA for Rouge Park and Bob Hunter Memorial Park purposes;
THAT said conveyance is subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action
to finalize the transaction including the obtaining needed approvals and the signing and
execution of any documents.
AMENDMENT
RES. #A240/13
Moved by: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Seconded by: Raymond Cho
THAT the following be inserted after the main motion:
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back on the future of the lands to the east of the Park.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS
THE RESULTANT MOTION READS AS FOLLOWS:
CARRIED
WHEREAS at Authority Meeting #2/12, held on March 30, 2012, the "Statement of Intent
- Towards Cooperation and Collaboration in the Establishment of a National Urban Park in
the Rouge Valley" was endorsed;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)
that it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering it's objectives, as set out in Section 20
of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Park Canada Agency (PC) in
this instance;
576
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA lands containing 2,266 hectares (5,600
acres), more or less, and highlighted on the attached plan be conveyed to PC for the
Rouge National Urban Park, in the cities of Toronto, Markham and Pickering, regional
municipalities of York and Durham subject to the following terms and conditions;
a) the consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00;
b) PC is to be responsible for all legal, survey and other costs related to the land
conveyance;
c) retention by TRCA of the lands included in the tripartite agreement between City of
Toronto, Toronto Zoo and TRCA subject to refining the boundaries;
d) conveyance by TRCA of lands and /or easements for municipal infrastructure to the
cities of Toronto, Markham and Pickering and the regional municipalities of York and
Durham if requested by the municipality and subject to concurrence by PC;
e) Locust Hill School House and Cedarena properties shall be subject to further
discussions between TRCA, PC and the City of Markham prior to being conveyed;
f) any additional considerations as deemed appropriate by TRCA staff or its solicitor.
THAT said conveyance be subject to the Province of Ontario releasing its interest in the
lands conveyed by it to TRCA for Rouge Park and Bob Hunter Memorial Park purposes;
THAT said conveyance is subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the
transaction including the obtaining needed approvals and the signing and execution of
any documents;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back on the future of the lands to the east of the Park.
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES. #A241/13 - SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Moved by: Ronald Chopowick
Seconded by: Glenn Mason
THAT Section II items EX8.1 - EX8.4, inclusive, contained in Executive Committee Minutes
#11/13, held on January 17, 2014, be received.
CARRIED
577
Section II Items EX8.1 - EX8.4, Inclusive
TORONTO ZOO
(Executive Res. #B 169/ 13)
HUMBER RIVER HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION PROGRAM FORTRAN MODEL UPDATE
(Executive Res. #B170113)
BLACK CREEK CHANNEL MAINTENANCE
(Executive Res. #B 171 / 13)
APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
(Executive Res. #B 172/ 13)
SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
RES. #A242/13 - SUMMARY OF PROCUREMENTS
2013 Annual Summary. Receipt of the 2013 end of year summary of
procurements approved by the Chief Executive Officer or his designate.
Moved by: Ben Cachola
Seconded by: Dave Ryan
THAT the summary of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) procurements
approved by the Chief Administrative Officer or designates for 2013, be received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #5/05, held on June 24, 2005, staff was requested to report to the
Authority on purchases which were approved by the Chief Executive Officer or designate. This
report provides that overview, of approvals that are subject to the Purchasing Policy, with the
exception of Schedule'B' items (Attachment 1) as they are exempt from the approval
requirements of the Purchasing Policy.
Pursuant to the resolution quoted above, the summaries of Requests for Quotations and
Requests for Proposals for 2013, are found in Attachment 3. The report includes approvals of
$10,000 or greater, approved by the Chief Executive Officer or his designate.
At Authority Meeting #6/13, held on July 26, 2013, a new Purchasing Policy was approved, with
changes in approval thresholds and purchasing methods, which are reflected in the
Attachments. Attachment 2 includes the criteria as to why non - competitive procurement was
appropriate for the particular goods or services procured, as per Section 1.14 of Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA's) former Purchasing Policy, and as per Sections 9.2 &
9.3 of TRCA's current Purchasing Policy, as both were in effect for parts of 2013.
As permitted under the approved policy, the Chief Executive Officer has designated senior staff,
generally including director and manager level positions, approval authority for purchases up to
$10,000 (exclusive of applicable taxes).
578
For the information of the members, staff undertook a review of purchases approved by the
Authority and Executive Committee in 2013 (including contingencies). The following is a
summary of purchases approved by the Authority and Executive Committee combined (Board)
and Chief Executive Officer /designate in 2013. Attachment 3 is a detailed listing of purchases
over $10,000 approved by the Chief Executive Officer /designate in 2013.
Total 2013 Purchases of Minimum Value of $10,000
Purchase Type
CEO & Designates
(Plus HST)
Board
(Plus HST)
Lowest Bid /Competitive
6,340,442.56
10,536,838.30
Not Lowest Bid
66,215.34
0.00
Sole Source
612,083.23
896,815.60
Preferred Source
367,526.80
234,913.00
TOTAL
7,386,267.93
11,668,566.90
GRAND TOTAL 2013
19,054,834.83
The total purchases for TRCA in 2013 of $10,000 or greater, approved by the Authority,
Executive Committee or Chief Executive Officer /designate was approximately $19 million,
including contingencies, excluding HST.
Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Email: kstranks @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Email: kstranks @trca.on.ca
Date: January 4, 2014
Attachments: 3
579
Attachment 1
SCHEDULE `B'
GOODS AND SERVICES EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF SCHEDULE'A'
The following purchases and payments are not subject to the approval and reporting
requirements of Schedule 'A', unless otherwise directed by the CEO or designate or as
provided in other TRCA policies. The CEO or designate shall establish procedures and
approval thresholds applicable to Schedule'B' items.
1. Utilities
• Electricity
• Water and sewage charges
• Natural gas, fuel oil, propane
• Basic telephone /data /internet /service
• Basic television cable service
2. Training and Education
• Membership and association fees, as permitted by TRCA policy
• Magazine and periodical subscriptions
• Staff development (except where bulk training is arranged through a bidding process)
• Conferences and seminars
• Tuition reimbursement in accordance with TRCA personnel policies
3. Refundable Employee Expenses
• Meal allowances
• Travel and transportation expenses
• Accommodations
• Mileage
• Other employee expenses incurred on TRCA business
4. General Expenses
• Property taxes
• Postage
• Licenses e.g. vehicles, software, municipal, etc.
• Land purchases, including expropriation costs and land registry fees
• Customer refunds
• Insurance deductibles
• Legal settlements
• Grievance payments
5. Petty Cash Replenishment
6. Payments to Current and Past Employees
• Salaries, wages and benefits due to any person in the employ of TRCA
• Retirement allowances, settlements and other payments due to a person previously in
the employ of TRCA
•
7. Government Payments
• Fees, levies and taxes payable to federal, provincial or municipal governments, or to
any agency, board or commission thereof
8. Debt
• All accounts for payments of principal or interest on debentures, loans or overdrafts,
including foreign exchange
9. Pension Deductions, Contributions and Employee Benefit Plan Payments
• Employee pension deductions and employer pension contributions
• Payments to the providers of employee benefit plans.
10. Grants and Contributions
• Research grants for special projects undertaken by qualified college or university staff
and /or students acting on behalf of their respective institution
• Payments made to landowners and similar groups under a granting program as
approved by the Authority.
• Grants to community groups and public service bodies to assist with research or
knowledge gathering which is of particular interest to TRCA
11. Goods and Services Purchased for Resale
12. Paid advertising
581
Attachment 2
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
PURCHASING POLICY
(Valid until July 26, 2013)
Section 1.14 Non - Competitive Procurement Process
A non - competitive procurement process shall only be used if one or more of the following
conditions apply and a process of negotiation is undertaken to obtain the best value in the
circumstances for the TRCA. Authorized Buyers are authorized to enter into negotiations
without formal competitive bids, under the following circumstances:
The goods and services are only available from one source or one supplier by reason of
one or more of the following:
• A statutory or market based monopoly
• A fluctuating market prevents the TRCA from obtaining price protection or owing to
market conditions, required goods or services are in short supply
• Existence of exclusive rights (patent, copyright or licence)
• Need for compatibility with goods and services previously acquired and there are no
reasonable alternatives, substitutes or accommodations
• Need to avoid violating warranties and guarantees where service is required
2. An attempt to purchase the required goods and services has been made in good faith
using a competitive method and has failed to identify a successful supplier.
3. When the extension or reinstatement of an existing contract would prove most
cost - effective or beneficial. The extension shall not exceed one year.
4. The goods and services are required as a result of an emergency, which would not
reasonably permit the use of the other methods permitted.
5. The required goods and services are to be supplied by a particular vendor or supplier
having special knowledge, skills, expertise or experience that cannot be provided by
any other supplier.
6. Any other sole or single source purchase permitted under the provisions of this policy
including those noted in Schedule `B'.
582
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
PURCHASING POLICY
(Valid after July 26, 2013)
9.2 Sole Source - A sole source purchase occurs only when there is one supplier of a
particular good or service that meets the requirements of TRCA by reason of one or
more of the following:
1. a statutory or market -based monopoly;
2. scarcity of supply in the market;
3. the goods or services are unique to one supplier and no practical
alternatives or substitutes exist.
9.3 Preferred Source - A preferred source purchase shall only be used if one or more of
the following conditions applies and a process of negotiation has been undertaken to
obtain the best value in the circumstances for TRCA:
1. The goods and services are only available from one source or one supplier by
reason of:
a. need for compatibility with goods and services previously acquired and there are
no reasonable alternatives, substitutes or accommodations;
b. desire to avoid violating warranties and guarantees where service is required.
2. The goods and services are required as a result of an emergency, which would not
reasonably permit the use of the regular procurement methods.
3. The required goods and services are to be supplied by a vendor or supplier having
specialized knowledge, skills, expertise or experience that cannot be reasonably
provided by any other supplier.
4. The required goods and services meet TRCA's sustainability criteria and guidelines
defined in the Policy and could not be reasonable met through regular procurement
methods.
5. Special research and development projects with academic institutions, government
bodies, industry organizations and similar bodies.
583
Attachment 3
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Lowest Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
Claireville Dam Fuel Tank Replacement
Tri -Phase Environmental Inc.
35,250.00
11/4
+8,800.00 contingency
Installation of Seatwalls at Petticoat Creek
Melfer Construction Inc.
21,200.00
biddingo /12
Conservation Area Aquatic Facility
+10% contingency
Rental Linen Products for BCPV & KCC
Canadian Linen and Uniform
62,344.00
4/2
Service
+10% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Irrigation Pump /Diesel
R &W Equipment Ltd.
38,815.00
3/3
Engine Drive Unit & Traveller for Nursery
Supply & Delivery Armour Stone & Gabion
Glenn Windrem Trucking
7,857.00
contract
Stone for Morningside Tributary Energy
+10% contingency
extension
Dissipation Structures Clearing & Bank
Stabilization Project
Supply & Delivery of Fuel for Bathurst Glen Golf
Armstrong Petroleum LTD.
18,000.00
3/3
Course & Bruce's Mill Conservation Area
Lake St. George Field Centre Roof Repairs -
B.W. Doucette Roofing
15,705.50
3/3
Snively House Dormitory
Supply & Delivery of Two Custom Precast
Acton Precast Concrete
35,200.00
5/3
Concrete Fishway & Water Control Structures
Limited
+5,280.00 contingency
for Humber River Marshes & Duff ins Creek
Marsh
Supply & Delivery of Wristband for TRCA's
Tornado Wristbands Inc.
10,860.00
biddingo +1/10
Aquatic Facilities
+10% contingency
Pool Supplies & Chemicals for TRCA's Aquatic
Aquatech Logistics Inc.
19,215.05
biddingo +2 /2
Facilities
+10% contingency
Horse Drawn Wagon Rides for Sugabush Maple
Lionel's Farm
27,000.00
8/2
Syrup Festival
+10% contingency
Demolition of 2 Storage Sheds & Disposal of
TBG Landscape Inc.
15,500.00
14/9
Debris at Brock North Lands
+20% contingency
Supply & Purchase of Hydrometrics Data
Aquatic Informatics
35,460.00
2/2
Analysis Software
Planting & Tending of Reforestation Seedlings
Bartram Woodlands
13,111.19
3/2
for Oak Ridges Corridor Park
Deer Exclusion Fence Materials for Peel & York
Roma Fence
11,192.00
3/3
Regions
+1,120.00 contingency.
Fabrication of Portable Bridge
Ganawa Bridge Products &
51,623.00
biddingo(18) /8
Services
+5,200.00 contingency
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Lowest Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
YONGE -YORK MILLS FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 450 Tonnes
Glenn Windrem Trucking
19,575.00
4/3
of 750mm Grantie Rip -rap to Reach 2
+4,000.00 contingency
Rental of Operated Heavy Equipment
TBG Landscape Inc.
91,000.00
14/9
+5,000.00 contingency
MEADOWCLIFFE DRIVE SLOPE STABILIZATION PROJECT
Supply & Delivery of 3,000 Tonnes of
Miller Paving Limited
71,910.00
14/5
300mm -600mm Rip Rap Stone
+10% contingency
Supply & Delivery of 700 Tonnes of
Miller Paving Limited
16,779.00
contract
300mm -600mm Rip Rap Stone
extension
Supply & Delivery of 1,000 Tonnes of 4 -6 Tonne
C.D.R. Young's Aggregates
55,850.00
26/5
Stackable Armourstone
+10% contingency,
FRENCHMAN'S BAY HARBOUR ENTRANCE PROJECT
Supply and Delivery of Approximately 750
C.D.R Young's Aggregates
34,455.00
13/3
Tonnes of 2 -4 Tonne Armour Stone
Inc.
+25% contingency
Supply and Delivery of App roxi mate ly790
C.D.R Young's Aggregates
36,292.60
13/3
Tonnes of Stackable 3 -5 Tonne Armour Stone
Inc.
+25% contingency
Waste Disposal Services
VIA Disposal Services Co.
10,000.00
contract
LTD.
extension
Supply & Delivery of 1,200 Tonnes of 2 -4 Tonne
B -Town Group
68,988.00
17/4
Uniform Stackable Armourstone
+25% contingency
BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE
Service of Kitchen Equipment
Restaurant Equipment
17,842.50
3/2
Professional Service
+10% contingency
Horse Drawn Wagon Rides for 2013 Season
Lionel's Farm
10,500.00
3/1
+10% contingency
Roblin's Mill Waterwheel Replacement
Byte Construction Ltd.
38,800.00
10/2
+10% contingency
2013 Visitor Guide Booklet
Warren's Waterless Printing
10,175.00
3/3
Replacement of 150 Chairs for Canada West
Mighty -Lite Inc.
18,648.72
3/3
Room
+brokerage fee
+10% contingency,
CLEANING AND WASHROOM SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC USE FACILITIES & FIELD CENTRES
(3 contracts based on lowest bids for the various products)
Contract #1
Quick Maccallum
14,552.55
Biddingo /10
+10% contingency
Contract #2
Mister Chemical
24,110.52
Biddingo /10
+10% contingency
Contract #3
Flexo
11,625.00
Biddingo /10
+10% contingency,
585
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Lowest Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
PORT UNION WATERFRONT IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 600 Tonnes
Brock Aggregates Inc.
10,440.00
20/6
of 19mm Crusher Run
+10% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 200 Tonnes
J.C. Rock Ltd.
9,292.00
20/5
of 2 -4 Tonne SStackable Armour Stone
+10% contingency
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for
Appco Paving
8,107.00
4/2
Asphalt Paving Works
+2,000.00 contingency
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for
Loc Pave Construction
69,900.00
7/6
Construction of Gravel Parking Lot
+6,990.00 contingency
TRCA HEAD OFFICE - 5 SHOREHAM DRIVE
Interior Alterations to Humber Room & Cafeteria
Meridian Construction Inc.
35,855.00
3/2
+30% contingency
New Tables & Chairs for Meeting Rooms
Blair's atWork Office Furniture
18,149.00
3/3
Purchase of 80" Digital Whiteboard and 2, 42"
Sharp Electronics Canada Ltd.
17,122.00
3/3
Commercial Monitors at a total cost not to
+10% contingency
exceed $17,122.00, plus a 10% contingency,
Supply & Installation of Pre -owned 5KW Wind
Kolapore Construction
44,930.00
6/1
Turbine & 30 Metre Tilt Tower
Supply and Delivery of Approximately 290
Miller Paving Ltd.
3,047.00
Contract
Tonnes of 75mm- 150mm Gabion Stone for
Extension
German Mill Settlers Park Maintenance Work
MARIE CURTIS PARK PROJECT (PHASE 2)
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 1,530 Cubic
Earthco Soil Mixtures
19,216.80
3/3
Metres of Screened Topsoil
+20% contingency
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for
Serve Construction Ltd.
33,547.50
4/3
Installation of Park Amenities
+8,400.00 contingency
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for
Four Seasons Site
57,242.00
4/3
Asphalt Paving Works
Development
+14,300.00
contingency
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for
TBG Landscape Inc.
20,707.57
6/2
Bridge Design & Installation
+5,200.00 contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 1,275
Lafarge Canada
21,802.50
15/6
Tonnes of 19mm Crusher Run Limestone
+20% contingency
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for
TBG Landscape Inc.
37,320.75
5/2
Installation of Nursery Sod
+9,500.00 contingency
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for
Appco Paving Ltd.
63,054.00
4/3
Installation of Park Amenitites
+19,000.00
contingency
•
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Lowest Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
Supply of Pyrotechnics Display for Caledon
Pyro World
18,585.90
13/3
Canada Celebrations at Albion Hills CA
+10% contingency
Masonry Repairs & Roof Replacement at Boyd
Martinway Contracting Ltd.
18,764.30
11/11
Office
+10,000.00
contingency
Fish Food for Glen Haffy CA
Martin Mills Inc.
16,542.90
2/2
+10% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Round Up for Gatineau
Frechette Lawncare
12,350.00
3/1
Hydro Corridor
+1,235.00 contingency
Supply & Delivery of Shredded Pine Mulch for
Earth Co. Soils Inc.
13,777.00
4/4
Spring Tree & Shrub Plantings for 11 Sites
+1,377.00 contingency
Preferred Supplier for Safety Footwear
Mark's Work Wearhouse
67,500.00
3/2
+10% contingency
Supply & Application of Roundup at Claireville
Leuschner's Lawn and
13,143.00
3/2
Conservation Area, Alto Property, Lindy
Landscape
+1,314.30 contingency
Property, Tommy Thompson park, Cherrywood
Property for Control of Dog - strangling Vine
Supply & Delivery of Picnic Table Frames to
Citygreen Urban Ltd.
41,305.50
5/4
Heart Lake, Glen Haffy & Albion Hills
+10% contingency
Conservation Areas, & Indian Line Campground
Wastewater Collenction & Dumping Service for
Smith Excavating, Grading
32,000.00
3/2
TRCA Public Use Facilities
and Septic Services
+10% contingency
Security Guard Services for Albion Hills and
Knights on Guard
20,000.00
4/1
Indian Line Campgrounds for 2013
+10% contingency
Purchase & Installation of Air Conditioning Unit
Canada's Home Renovation
10,600.00
3/3
in Head Office Server Room
Depot
+10% contingency
Survey Work for Leasing of Land to Treetop
Young & Young Surveying
12,100.00
3/2
Trekking Heart Lake Inc.
Inc.
+10% contingency
Printing & Mailing of Landowner Letters in CTC
Troi Mailing Services Inc.
30,000.00
4/4
Source Protection Region
Apply Top Coat Paving Surface to 14th Avenue
Appco Paving Ltd.
41,222.40
6/5
Multi -use Trail through Bob Hunter Memorial
+15% contingency
Park
Installation of Windows & Frames in Support of
The New Glass Shop
8,300.00
7/3
G. Ross Lord Dam Windows Replacement
+2,500.00 contingency
Project
Claireville Dam Windows & Doors Replacement
R -Chad
31,000.00
7/2
+7,750.00 contingency
Lettershop Work Related to 2013 TRCA
Swiss Print International
10,912.00
3/2
Education Programs Direct Mail Campaign be
awarded to Swiss Print International at a cost
not to exceed $10,912.00
587
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Lowest Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
AQUISITION OF VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT
Two New 2013 4X4 Crew Cab Trucks
Donway Ford Sales
83,062.00
30/6
One New 2013 4X4 Chassis Crew Cab Truck
Marciver Dodge Limited
36,275.00
30/6
with Hydraulic Dump Box
One New 2013 4X4 Chassis Crew Cab Truck
Marciver Dodge Limited
36,033.00
30/6
with Hydraulic Dump Box
One New 2013 4X4 Chassis Crew Cab Truck
Marciver Dodge Limited
23,573.00
30/7
One New 2013 4X4 Chassis Crew Cab Truck
Ontario Chrysler Jeep Dodge
38,081.00
30/6
Inc.
Two New Kubota RTV900 ST Worksite Utility
Ed Stewart's Garage
32,249.74
30/2
Vehicles
One New Kubota RTV900 ST Worksite Utility
Ed Stewart's Garage
15,800.00
30/3
Vechicle
One New Kubota RTV900 ST Worksite Utility
Ed Stewart's Garage
16,022.81
30/3
Vechicle
One New Kubota RTV900 ST Worksite Utility
Ed Stewart's Garage
14,432.28
30/3
Vechicle
One New Cast TV 380 Tracked Skidsteer
Stewart's Equipment
60,655.00
4/3
One New Kubota F3680 4WD Front Mower
Kooy Brothers Lawn
21,375.00
5/1
Equipment Ltd.
One New 2013 Ford Explorer 4WD SUV
Formula Ford Lincoln
30,630.00
15/3
One New 2013 Ford Escape SE 4WD
Formula Ford Sales
24,180.00
6/2
One New 4x4 Chassis Cab Truck
Donway Ford Sales
38,733.00
6/3
One New 2014 Ford Escape SE 4WD
East -Court Ford Lincoln Sales
24,280.00
6/2
BATHURST GLEN GOLF COURSE
Replace Damaged Poles & Netting for Bathurst
Turf Net Sports Supplies
22,575.00
3/2
Glen Driving Range
Golf Cart Rentals
Bennett Golf Carts
13,500.00
3/2
+10% contingency
Supply of Liquid & Granular Fertilizer Products
AIITurf Ltd.
14,353.50
3/3
+10% contingency,
SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES
Seven Residental Rental Properties & Vacant
Crystal Lawn and Snow
25,920.00
Biddingo/
Residential Rental Properties
Removal Inc.
+10% contingency
various
Two Residental Rental Properties
A.I Roadtech Services Inc.
14,500.00
Biddingo /4
+10% contingency
One Rental Properties
Vette Trucking Inc.
7,000.00
Biddingo /7
+10% contingency
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Lowest Bid (up to $100,000
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
TRCA RENTAL PROPERTIES
Pest Control Services for Residential Rental
Environmental Pest Control
30,000.00
7/5
Properties
+ 10% contingency
Heating Maintenance Services for Residential
Chalmers Esso Fuels
16,796.50
4/2
Rental Properties
+10% contingency
Well Decommissioning & Replacement at 4020
Roger Boadway Enterprises
14,791.55
5/2
Westney Road, Claremont
Ltd.
+15% contingency
Roof Replacement at the Main House & Cottage
B.W. Doucette Roofing
13,390.00
6/4
at 11741 Huntington Road, Kleinburg
+10% contingency
Roof Replacement at 18630 Centreville Creek
Tony K. Aluminum /Roofing
8,200.00
6/4
Road, Caledon
+10% contingency
Well Decommissioning & Drilling of New Well at
Roger Boadway Enterprises
14,791.55
5/2
7907 Reesor Road, Markham
Ltd.
+15% contingency
Roof Replacement, Trough, Soffit & Fascia
Tony K. Aluminum /Roofing
20,975.00
4/4
Repair at 8949 Reesor Road
+10% contingency
Roof Replacement at Main House at 11741
B.W. Doucette Roofing
4,422.00
contract
Huntington Road, Kleinburg
extension
Drilling of New Well at 16441 Humber Station
Roger Boadway Enterprises
14,366.55
5/2
Road, Bolton
Ltd.
+15% contingency
Roof Replacement, Trouge /Downspouts, &
Tony K. Roofing Inc.
10,000.00
4/3
Soffit & Fascia Repairs at 7933 14th Avenue,
+10% contingency
Dimma House, Rouge Park
Removal of Visible Mould, Asbestos Plaster
Envirosafe Inc.
17,900.00
3/3
Debris & Garbage from 7933 14th Avenue,
+10% contingency
Dimma House, Rouge Park
Roof & Eaves Replacement at 8847 Reesor
Tony K. Aluminum /Roofing
9,500.00
6/2
Road, Rouge Park
+10% contingency
Exterior Painting & Repairs at 537 Conservation
Nova Decor Construction Ltd.
9,620.00
5/3
Drive, Brampton
+10% contingency
Walkway, Patio & Retaining Wall Reconstruction
ISmith Excavating Grading &
14,700.00
4/1
at 9330 Pine Valley Drive, Woodbridge
ISeptic Services
+10% contingency,
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Lowest Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
MUD CREEK REACH 5 RESTORATION PROJECT
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for
TGB Landscape Inc.
16,385.00
15/5
Tree Removal at Mud Creek Reach 5
+10,000.00
Restoration Project
contingency
Creek Bypass Pumping Works
Xylem Water Solutions
51,900.00
4/2
+13,000.00
contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 530 Tonnes
Miller Paving Limited
9,858.00
18/7
of 50mm Crusher Run Limestone
+25% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 1,610
TBG Landscape Inc.
31,169.60
18/7
Tonnes of Granular A
+25% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 400 Tonnes
TBG Landscape Inc.
16,544.00
18/4
of 800mm Round Stone
+15% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 2,400
Miller Paving Limited
65,640.00
18/6
Tonnes of 150mm -300mm Gabion Stone
+25% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 330 Tonnes
TBG Landscape Inc.
13,860.00
18/4
of 500mm Roundstone
+10% contingency
ALFRED KUEHNE BOULEVARD PROJECT
Sewer Encasement Works
Four Seasons Site
35,500.00
12/6
Development
+10,000.00
contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 1,625
Glenn Windrem Trucking
71,500.00
5/2
Tonnes of 500mm - 750mm Round Stone
+10% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 625 Tonnes
Glenn Windrem Trucking
20,625.00
5/2
of 1 00m - 200mm Round Stone
+10% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 250 Tonnes
Glenn Windrem Trucking
11,000.00
5/2
of 300mm - 600mm Round Stone
+10% contingency
OAK RIDGES CORRIDOR PARK
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 4,200
Nelson Aggregate Co.
71,190.000
4/4
Tonnes of 19mm Crusher Run Limestone
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 1,000
Nelson Aggregate Co.
15,750.00
4/4
Tonnes of 6mm Limestone Screenings
Supply and Delivery of Approximately 1,400
Miller Paving
$20,580.00
8/5
Tonnes of Limestone Screenings to the Oak
+20% contingency
Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve - East
Spine Trail - Phase 1 Miller Paving for a total
unit price of $14.70 per tonne and a total cost
not to exceed $20,580, plus HST, plus a 20%
contingency
HIGHLAND CREEK DOWNSTREAM OF MORNINGSIDE AVENUE EROSION
CONTROL PROJECT
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 2,300
Miller Paving Ltd.
59,800.00
19/6
Tonnes of 150mm - 300mm Gabion Stone
+20% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 1,400
Miller Paving Ltd.
44,380.00
19/5
Tonnes of 600mm - 800mm Rip Rap
+20% contingency
590
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Lowest Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
CABLE CONDUIT INSTALLATION
Boyd Office
Langley Utilities
14,406.00
biddingo(8) /8
+8,500.00 contingency
Eastville Office
Langley Utilities
4,516.00
biddingo(8) /8
+2,600.00 contingency
Restoration Services Centre
Langley Utilities
21,114.00
biddingo(8) /8
+12,500.00
contingency
Swan Lake
Langley Utilities
7,792.00
biddingo(8) /8
+4,600.00 contingency
Heart Lake
Langley Utilities
77,882.00
biddingo (8)/7
+19,500.00
contingency,
ALBION HILLS CONSERVATION AREA ROADS AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 1,900
Glenn Windrem Trucking
36,803.00
14/5
Tonnes of 50mm Crusher Run Limestone
+25% contingency
Supply and Delivery of Materials to Reinstate &
Terrafix Geosynthetics Inc.
15,184.00
3/2
Upgrade Existing Drainage Swales at a total
+10% contingency
cost not to exceed $15,184.00, plus a 10%
contingency
Supply and Delivery of Approximately 955
Glenn Windrem Trucking
18,498.35
14/5
Tonnes of 19mm Crusher Run Limestone
+25% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 405 Tonnes
Glenn Windrem Trucking
7,844.85
contract
of 19mm Crusher Run Limestone
extension
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 725 Tonnes
Glenn Windrem Trucking
14,043.25
contract
of 50mm Crusher Run Limestone
extension
DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS TRAIL CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
Supply and Delivery of Approximately 1,000
Glenn Windrem Trucking
18,420.00
11/4
Tonnes of Granular'A' Aggregate
+20% contingency
Supply of All Labour, Materials & Equipment for
Pacific Paving
64,800.00
6/2
Asphalt Paving Works
+20% contingency
MID HUMBER TRAIL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 1,750
Lafarge Canada
28,787.00
4/2
Tonnes of Granular'A' Aggregate
+10% contingency
Supply of All Labour, Materials & Equipment for
Pacific Paving Ltd.
47,448.00
6/3
Ashpahlt Paving Works
+25% contingency
HEART LAKE WORKSHOP PROJECT
Supply and Delivery of Approximately 780
Dufferin Aggregates
11,910.60
20/5
Tonnes of 19mm Crusher Run Limestone
+10% contingency
supply and delivery of approximately 1,400
Duff erin Aggregates
21,378.00
20/5
tonnes of 50mm Crusher Run Limestone
+10% contingency
591
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Lowest Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
Pedestrian Bridge Removal at Black Creek
Hobden Construction
34,400.00
7/5
Channel
Company Ltd.
3,500.00 contingency
Supply and Delivery of Approximately 750
James Dick Construction
10,927.50
14/6
Tonnes of 19mm Crusher Run Limestone
Limited
+20% contingency
(Granular A) to Greenwood Conservation Lands
- Rodar Parking Lot Extension Project
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for
Platinum Electrical
73,999.00
biddingo
Generator Replacement Works at G. Ross Lord
Contractors
+22,200.00
(22)/10
Dam
contingency
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for
Pacific Paving
14,375.00
6/3
Asphalt Paving Works in support of the Burke
+20% contingency
Brook Trail Improvement Project
Polymer for Dredging of Sisters of St. Joseph
Ground Force Environmental
54,000.00
4/3
and Lansing Stormwater Management Ponds
Inc.
15% Contingency
Purchase of Waste & Recycling Bins for Indian
Miller Waste
13,506.25
3/3
Line Campground & Heart Lake Conservation
+10% contingency
Area be awarded to Miller Waste at a cost not to
exceed $13,506.25, plus 10% contingency
Windows and Doors Replacement at Glen Haffy
Canadian Choice Windows
21,466.00
5/3
and Albion Hills Conservation Areas
Inc.
+10% contingency
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for
Serve Construction
29,002.50
6/3
Access Road & Railway Crossing Improvements
+7,250.00 contingency
for Chesterton Shores
Supply of Labour, Materials & Equipment for the
Sky High Roofing & Sheet
17,360.00
biddingo /3
Installation of Metal Roofing & Roof
Metal Inc.
+10% contingency
Components for Indian Line Camp Pool
Building
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 1,500
Glenn Windrem Trucking
27,975.00
3/3
Tonnes of Gravel Pit Source Granular'A' to
+10% contingency
Cottonwood Flats, Toronto
2013 -2015 BCPV HVAC Services
Ontario Air Systems
10,200.00
3/1
+10% contingency
Supply & Delivery of 750 Tonnes of 19mm
Dufferin Aggregates
11,752.50
16/6
Crusher Run Limestone (Granular'A') to
+25% contingency
Valleywoods Trail Realignment Project, Caledon
Upgrade Poplar & Humber Washrooms at
Jeffrey G. Wallands
58,842.00
biddingo /10
Indian Line Campground
Construction Ltd.
+10% contingency
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 800 Tonnes
C.D.R Young's Aggregates
38,240.00
contract
of 2 -4 Tonne Stackable Armourstone to the
Inc.
extension
Highland Creek Downstream of Morningside
Avenue Erosion Control Project, Toronto
Turbidity Monitoring Equipment
Hoskin Scientific Ltd.
14,697.00
3/3
+5% contingency
592
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Lowest Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
Supply & Installation of Fibre Optic & Telephone
Dilisado Enterprises
36,850.00
3/2
Cables at Heart Lake Conservation Area
+9,000.00 contingency
Supply & Installation of Open Concept Office
Steelcase Inc.
77,888.95
3/3
Furniture
+10% contingency
Supply & Installation of Furniture & Fixtures at
Mayhew
67,224.45
2/2
Black Creek Pioneer Village Administrative
+10% contingency
Office
Supply of Natural Stone Material for Installation
Beaver Valley Stone Ltd.
14,418.25
3/1
of Staff Vegetable Garden at Head Office
1
1 +2,256.75 contingency,
JERSEY CREEK AT HWY 407 MAJOR MAINTENANCE PROJECT
Supply and Delivery of Approximately 270
B -Town Group
15,187.50
17/3
Tonnes of 2- 4 Tonne Stackable Armourstone
+10% contingency
Supply and Delivery of Approximately 250
Glenn Windrem Trucking Ltd.
10,875.00
17/3
Tonnes of 300mm- 400mm Round Stone
+10% contingency
TOTAL
4,817,453.05
593
REQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL
Competitive /Highest Ranked Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
Detailed Design for Construction of 3 Pedestrial
Brown & Co. Engineering
30,800.00
7/4
Bridges at Taylor Creek Park
Limited
+6,000.00 contingency
Heart Lake Dragon Boat Festival Event Delivery
Great White North Dragon
15,000.00
5/2
& Equipment Rentals
Boat
Final Design of Canoe Launch & Dock at Rotary
Sanchez Engineering Inc.
14,930.00
16/3
Park
+10% contingency
Telephony Consulting
Fox Group
29,906.00
14/3
Third Party Public Facilitor for Ashbridge's Bay
Swerhun Inc.
18,620.00
7/5
Erosion & Sediment Control Project
+20% contingency
Bolton Camp Bridget Assessment with Detailed
Stephenson Engineering
25,720.00
6/2
Design & Specifications for Construction
Detailed Design for Installatio of Emergency
Ameresco Consulting
29,600.00
14/14
Generator at BCPV
+20% contingency
Presentation Drawings for Bolton Camp:
Gow Hastings Architects Inc.
12,350.00
4/4
Ontario's Near -urban Adventure Centre
+10% contingency
Presentation Drawings for Bolton Camp:
Gow Hastings Architects Inc.
4,000.00
contract
Ontario's Near -urban Adventure Centre
+10% contingency
extension
2013 Laboratory Analytical Services
AGAT Laboratories
79,130.00
3/2
Partners in Project Green Website for April 2013
WirelessLinx Inc.
16,500.00
biddingo /8
— March 2014 be awarded to at a cost not to
exceed $16,500.00
Engineering Services for Humber Station Road
WalterFedy
39,540.00
biddingo /6
Project
+20% contingency
Professional Engineering Services for HVAC
Paul Didur Architects
70,675.00
biddingo /6
Upgrades at Albion Hills Field Centre
Incorporated
+25% contingency
ROUGE PARK NATURAL HERITAGE GRANT PROGRAM
Odonate Survey of Rouge Park
Citizen Scientists
2,440.00
Rouge Park
(RP) website /13
Freshwater Mussels in Rouge Park
Toronto Zoo
6,700.00
RP website /13
Forest Succession
10,000 Trees for the Rouge
19,100.00
RP website /13
Stream & Wetland Restoration Evaluation
Ontario Streams
8,668.91
RP website /13
Bob Hunter Memorial Park Diversification
Rouge Valley Naturalists
26,000.00
RP website /13
Restoration
Species at Risk Reptile Recovery in Rouge Park
Toronto Zoo
9,315.00
RP website /13
Rouge Park Phragmites Control & Maintenance
Ontario Streams
8,700.00
RP website /13
Habitat Restoration on Priority Rouge Park Sites
Friends of the Rouge
67,145.40
RP website /13
Watershed
Little Rouge Creek Rehabilitation & Monitoring
JOntario Streams
14,675.801
RP website /13
594
REQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL
Competitive /Highest Ranked Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN
Venue & Refreshements for Training &
Centre for Health and Safety
10,000.00
34/3
Networking Events
Innovation
Venue & Refreshements for Training &
International Centre
10,000.00
34/3
Networking Events
Venue & Refreshements for Training &
Hilton Garden Inn - Toronto
10,000.00
34/3
Networking Events
Airport
Filming & Editing of Video Case Studies
Powerline Films
22,080.00
8/3
Filming & Editing of Training & Networking
Images Made Real
11,050.00
8/3
Events
Corporate Calling Requirements for 2014
TigerTel
22,998.00
3/3
Membership Campaign
Undertake Engineering Services in Support of
GHD
25,488.00
5/3
the Marigold Creek - Humber River Aquatic
+20% contingency
Restoration Project be awarded to at a total cost
not to exceed $25,488.00
Website Design & Development Services for
Carbonated Interactive Inc.
19,620.00
biddingo (3)/3
2012 Annual Report & Corporate Social
Resposibility Report
CLAREMONT FIELD CENTRE RETROFIT AND RENOVATION PROJECT
Architectural, Structural, Electrical & Mechanical
Levitt Goodman Architects
39,200.00
5/3
Engineering Services
+25% contingency
Detailed Design for Repair of Rotary Park's
Shoreplan Engineering Ltd.
18,750.00
3/3
Shoreline Armouring, City of Toronto
+1,875.00 contingency
Complete Assessment Report of the Existing
Geomorphic Solutions
17,081.25
Contract
Stormwater Management Pond & Associated
(G.H.D)
+3,416.25 contingency
Extension
Drainage Channel Behind English Rose Lane,
Town of Caledon
Geotechnical Investigation to Develop
Cole Engineering Group
13,462.00
biddingo (6)/6
Preliminary Design Concepts for the Slope &
+1,350.00 contingency
Tableland Behind the House Located at 29
Jason Road, City of Toronto
Wild Water Kingdom Lease Advisory Services
Cameron Hawkins &
10,000.00
9/5
Associates Inc.
+disbursements
+15% contingency
Detailed Design of Slope Stabilization & Erosion
Sarafinchin Associates Limited
54,100.00
biddingo (14)/2
Control Works at Scarborough Bluffs, 26 to 30
+30% contingency
Livingston Road, Toronto
Waste Management Consultancy Services be
Land Use Research
41,690.00
biddingo
awarded to at a total cost not to exceed
Associates (also known as
(10)/10
$41,690.00
Lura Consulting)
595
REQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL
Competitive /Highest Ranked Bid (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
SLOPE STABILITY AND EROSION RISK
Assessments for 10 Properties, Toronto
Sarafinchin Associated Ltd.
48,500.40
5/3
+10,000.00
contingency
Assessments for 13 Properties, Toronto
Terraprobe Inc.
68,790.00
5/3
+10,000.00
contingency
Detailed Design of Works for 4180 to 4190
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
I
16,928.00
I
biddinge (30)/6
Dundas Street West, Toronto
+10% contingency
GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN ALTERNATIVES
At -risk Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure, Patterson
Parish Geomorphic Limited
12,420.00
6/4
Creek Near Bathurst Street & Carrville Road,
+10,000.00
Richmond Hill
contingency
Exposed Sanitary Infrastructure, West Don River
Greck and Associates Ltd.
15,800.00
6/4
Near Dufferin & Centre Streets, Vaughan
+1,600.00 contingency
At -risk Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure, Don River
Parish Geomorphic Limited
11,920.00
6/4
Near Langstaff Road & Keele Street, Vaughan
+6,000.00 contingency
Detailed Design for Snelgrove Drainage
Greck and Associates
17,680.00
5/3
Channel Maintenance Project
+4,000.00 contingency
Preparation of Phases 2 & 3 of SNAP for
Lura Consulting
99,795.00
8/4
Bayview Glen Neighbourhood in Markham
Elevation Data Acquisition for 2D Flood
Group PHB
32,500.00
3/3
Modelling Project, Little Etobicoke Creek
Engineering Consulting Services for Albion Hllls
Genivar
12,993.00
4/4
Conservation Area Environmental Compliance
+10% contingency
Approval Project
Develop 2D Hydraulic Model & Update
Valdor Engineering Inc.
54,590.00
4/4
Floodline Mapping for Lower Humber
+20% contingency
Geomorphic Assessment Report of a Section of
Parish Geomorphic
3,000.00
contract
West Etobicoke Creek, near Kennedy Road and
extension
Mayfield Road, Town of Caledon
Supply & Delivery of Approximately 1,200
James Dick Construction
32,430.25
3/3
Tonnes of 19mm Crusher & 625 Tonnes of
Limited
+3,243.00 contingency
50mm Crusher to McKean Lane Realignment
Project
Safety Review of Stouffville Dam
OEL- HydroSys, a BluMetric
59,988.00
biddingo(31) /9
Company
+10% contingency
Detailed Engineering Design & Construction
R.V. Anderson and Associates
11,250.00
contract
Review Services of Chorley Park Switchback
+1,000.00 contingency
extension
Trail
TOTAL
1,522,989.51
Combined Lowest Bid & Competitive Total = $6,340,442.56
596
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Lowest Bid or Highest Ranks Not Accepted (up to $25,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Number of
($)
Quotations
Plus HST
Requested/
Complete Bids
Received
Refinishing the Aqualab
Bristol Marine
12,335.34
3/3
Production & Installation of 15 Interpretive Signs
Fontasy Sign and Display Inc.
16,425.00
4/2
for Bob Hunter Memorial Park
SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES
Black Creek Pioneer Village
Beaver Window and Awning
11,000.00
biddingo /8
Cleaners Inc.
+10% contingency
G. Ross Lord & Claireville Dams
Crystal Lawn and Snow
10,480.00
biddingo /6
Removal
+10% contingency
Bruce's Mill Conservation Area
A.I Roadtech Services Inc.
12,570.00
biddingo /3
10% contignency,
TOTAL
66,215.34
597
REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION
Sole Source (up to $50,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Sole Source
($)
Criteria
Plus HST
(Section 1.14
of TRCA's
Purchasing
Policy)
Professional Planning Consulting Services for
The Butler Group Consultants
20,000.00
5
Expropriation of Vinen Atlantic S.A. Property for
Inc.
+10% contingency
Mimico Waterfront Linear Park Project
+ disbursements
25 Infra -red Trail Counters in Peel Region
TRAFx Research Ltd.
10,375.00
5
+shipping
Supply of Paper for 2013
Spicers
15,000
3
+10% contingency
Refinement of Updated Hydraulic Modelling &
R.J. Burnside and Associates
12,000.00
5
Digital Floodline Mapping for Bolton SPA
Ltd.
Supply of Online Modular Equipment Safety
Landscape Safety Training
22,500.00
2
Training (One year at $11,250 + 2nd year
Systems
renewal at same rate, with satisfactory
performance)
Acquisition of Sontek Flowtracker Acoustic
Hoskin Scientific Limited
11,210.00
1
Doppler Velocimeter
Data on Landuse to Undertake Verification of
Municipal Property
15,000.00
1
Threat Enumeration - Source Water Protection
Assessment Corporation
+shipping
Program
Transport of Canada Geese from the Greater
Thur & Sones Limited
13,000.00
5
Toronto Area Waterfront to a Relocation Facility
+10% contingency
Tipping & Haulage Fees to Dispose of 700
TBG Landscape Inc.
27,650.00
5
Tonnes of Contaminated Stockpiled Material
+10,000.00
contingency
Implement Best Management Practices for
Ontario Federation of Anglers
25,000.00
5
Small Scale Equine Operations in Duff ins Creek
and Hunters
Watershed
Installation of Sinks for Safe Food Handling at
Nor -Line Plumbing &
10,763.16
5
Black Creek Pioneer Village
Mechanical Ltd.
Purchase of 56 Litres of TreeAzin for Treatment
BioForest Inc.
30,744.00
1
of High Value Ash Trees
Breathing Wall Upgrades
Nedlaw Living Walls
12,850.00
5
+10% contingency,
GROUNDWATER MONITORING EQUIPMENT
33 Customized Stainless Steel Drive Point Wells
Rice Engineering Ltd.
11,551.63
1
+1,000.00 contingency
35 Water Level Sensors
Schlumberger Water Services
18,115.00
1
+1,000.00 contingency
•
REQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL
Sole Source (up to $50,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Sole Source
($)
Criteria
Plus HST
(Section 9.2 of
Facilitation Services for PIC & CLC Meetings for
Swerhun - Faciliation &
19,000.00
5
DMNP EA
Decision Support
+20% contingency
Purchasing
Outdoor Pool Deck Repair Monitoring
Giffin Koerth
45,000.00
5
Consulting Services for Heart Lake CA
Lanark Cedar
+10% contingency
3
Website & Application Support & Development
Three Wise Men Inc.
46,000.00
5
Services for TRCA Managed Websites
Sturgeon Falls Brush Group
19,960.00
3
Slope Stabilization Design Alternatives for
Sarafinchin Consulting
27,175.20
5
441 -449 Guildwood Parkway
Engineers
+30% contingency
Peer Review the Whitevale Creek Erosion
Aquafor Beech Ltd.
11,125.00
5
Analysis
2013 Summer Radio Campaign for Black Creek
Rogers Media
17,400.00
3
Pioneer Village
ECOENERGY INNOVATION INITIATIVE (ECO II) RENE 092
Supporting Instrumentation
Kipp & Zonen USA Inc.
33,130.68
5
Supporting Instrumentation
National Instruments Canada
35,000.00
5
Advertising to Promote Release of Watershed
The Ontario Educational
10,000.00
1
Report Cards
Communications Authority
JVO)
Instrumentation for The LDC Tomorrow Fund
Elector- meters Co Ltd.
30,000.00
3
+10% contingency
TOTAL
567,127.23
REQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL
Sole Source (up to $100,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Sole Source
($)
Criteria
Plus HST
(Section 9.2 of
TRCA's
Purchasing
Policy)
Eastern White Cedar Post and Paddle Fencing
Lanark Cedar
23,000.00
3
Materials for Restoration Services Projects
Assembly & Delivery of 12 Custom Built Timber
Sturgeon Falls Brush Group
19,960.00
3
Mats
+100 contingency,
TOTAL
44,956.00
Combined Sole Source Total = $612,083.23
599
PREFERRED SOURCE
(up to $50,000)
Project /Product
Awarded Bidder
Cost Not to Exceed
Preferred
($)
Source Criteria
Plus HST
(Section 9.3 of
TRCA's
Purchasing
Policy)
Continue Development of NexFlood Real -Time
Computational Hydraulics
32,044.00
3
Flood Forecasting and Warning System
International
+20% contingency
Architectural Design & Construction
Plant Architect Inc.
33,000.00
3
Administration Services for Pavilions &
+15% contingency
Landscape Elements at East Point Park Bird
Sanctuary
Research, Design, Facilitation, Filming & Editing
Ascentia and Chalkboard
15,000.00
3
for SNAP Video
Media
Development of Data - driven Flash Flood
York University
33,000.00
5
Prediction Model
SLOPE STABILITY AND EROSION RISK
Preliminary Slope Assessments for 54
Terraprobe Inc.
38,465.00
2
Properties in Toronto
+4,000.00 contingnecy
Preliminary Slope Assessments for 27
Terraprobe Inc.
18,889.00
2
Properties in Toronto
Complete Slope Stability Review from 61 to 149
Terraprobe Inc.
36,900.00
3
Sylvan Avenue, Toronto
+7,650.00 contingency
Advisory Planning & Design Services to Prepare
DTAH
22,000.00
3
New Head Office Concepts & Preliminary Site
Development Options
Fabrication of All Signs for Albion Hills
Fontasy Sign and Display Inc.
20,000.00
3
Conservation Area be awarded to for a total
+10% contingency
cost not to exceed $20,000.00 plus 10%
contingency, plus HST.
Online Safety Training Modules
W.R.M. Safety Solutions
18,500.00
contract
extension
Overnight, Weekend & Holiday Security at East
Knights On Guard Security
49,720.00
3
& West Sides at Frenchman's Bay
Surveillance Systems Corp.
Town of Aurora Tree Canopy Assessment
Spatial Analysis Laboratory of
15,000.00
3
the Rubenstein School of the
Environment and Natural
Resources at University of
Vermont
Green Infrastructure Government Education &
David Suzuki Foundation
10,000.00
3
Engagement
TOTAL
367,526.80
RES. #A243/13 - SENIOR STAFF EXPENSES
Summary of senior staff expenses for the year 2013.
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT the summary of expense details for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's
(TRCA) Chief Executive Officer and Directors for January 1 to December 31, 2013, be
received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Toronto City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, the following resolution was approved:
City Council approve the publication on the City's public website on a semi - annual basis,
commencing with the 2011 calendar year, expenses related to business travel,
conferences and training, hospitality and protocol for senior staff positions at the Division
Head level and above.
City Council provide a copy of this Item to the City's major agencies and corporations
requesting that they adopt a similar policy for their organization if they have not already
done so.
In keeping with this request, TRCA staff advised the City of Toronto that TRCA staff will report to
the Authority annually on the expenses outlined in the City staff report dated October 19, 2011 -
Feasibility of Publishing Expense Details of Senior City Staff on the City's Website, for TRCA's
senior staff including the Chief Executive Officer and divisional Directors. This information will
be available on the TRCA website as a staff report in the minutes of the meeting.
TRCA advised the City that this practice would commence with the 2013 calendar year.
Expenses to be published include the following, and are detailed in Attachment 1:
1. business travel (including kilometrage reimbursement or operating costs when vehicle is
provided to the employee);
2. conferences and training (including accommodation, registration and per diem allowance);
3. hospitality or protocol expenses (hosting TRCA events for non - employees at eating
establishments or other appropriate locations).
Report prepared by: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232
Emails: rsgambelluri @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Rocco Sgambelluri, extension 5232
Emails: rsgambelluri @trca.on.ca
Date: January 20, 2014
Attachments: 1
601
Attachment 1
Senior Staff (Chief Executive Officer & Directors) Expenses
January 1 - December 31, 2013
BRIAN DENNEY, Chief Executive Officer
Business Travel
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
Parking &Transit
$ 622.37
Apr -16
* Airfare to CaGBC in Vancouver
$ 657.47
2 -Jun
* Train from Vancouver Aiport to Hotel for CaGBC
$ 7.75
6 -Jun
* Toronto Airport Parking for CaGBC
$ 90.00
6 -Jun
* Train from Hotel to Vancouver Airport for CaGBC
$ 5.50
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
407 ETR
$ 468.90
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
Operating Cost of Assigned Vehicle
$ 2,733.34
TOTAL
$ 4,585.33
Conferences and Training
Apr -22
Rotmans Discussion Seriers Lecture
$ 28.25
Jun -06
* Hotel accommodation for CaGBC in Vancouver
$ 1,020.52
Nov -14
* Hotel accommodation for CaGBC in Ottawa
$ 435.04
Oct -16
TOTAL
$ 1,483.81
Hospitality and Protocol
Apr -06
Lunch meeting with Evergreen
$ 63.68
May -21
Strategic Plan Dinner Meeting with Consultant
$ 77.97
Jun -14
Lunch & Frenchman's Bay Tour with Government Officials
$ 36.21
Oct -16
Lunch Meeting with Urban Land Institute
$ 59.02
Oct -27
TOTAL
$ 236.88
* TRCA received a per diem from Canada Green Building Council (CaGBC) in the amount
of $2,400 for Brian Denney's attendance at CaGBC meetings.
DEREK EDWARDS, Director, Parks and Culture
Business Travel
Jan. 1 - Dec. 31
Parking & Transit
$ 28.50
Aug -12
Airfare to IFPRA Congress /ARPA Conference in Calgary
$ 651.02
Oct -27
Toronto Airport Parking for IFPRA Congress
$ 43.90
Oct -27
Car Rental for IFPRA World Congress in Calgary
$ 167.13
Oct -27
Fuel for Rental Car in Calgary
$ 41.56
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
407 ETR
$ 862.73
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
Operating Cost of Assigned Vehicle
$ 4,996.89
TOTAL
$ 6,791.73
602
Conferences and Training
Mar -17
Hotel Accommodation for PRO Education forum in Collingwood
$ 480.63
Aug -21
Registration for IFPRA Congress /ARPA Conference and Workshop in Lake
Louise
$ 959.70
Oct -22
Meal while attending IFPRA Congress /ARPA Conference and Workshop
$ 26.50
Oct -23
Day Pass for 4, Heritage Park Visit - IFPRA Congress
$ 39.20
Oct -23
Accommodation near Calgary Airport for IFPRA Congress
$ 184.21
Oct -28
Accommodation while at IFPRA Congress, Lake Louise
$ 973.52
167.85
TOTAL
$ 2,663.76
Hospitality and Protocol - No expenses
ADELE FREEMAN, Director, Watershed Management
Business Travel
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
Parking &Transit
$ 113.00
Jan.1 Dec. 31
Airfare
$ -
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
407 ETR
$ -
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
Travel Allowance
$ 1,838.40
$
TOTAL
$ 1,951.40
Conferences & Training - No Expenses
Hospitality and Protocol
Lunch for TRCA, Waterfront Toronto, City of Toronto and Consulting Staff -
Oct -10 PLAI Meeting $ 95.51
TOTAL $ 95.51
DEBORAH MARTIN - DOWNS, Director, Ecology
Conferences & Training - No Expenses
Hospitality and Protocol - No expenses
603
Business Travel
Jan, 1
Dec. 31
Parking & Transit
$
30.00
Jan.1
Dec. 31
Airfare
$
-
Jan. 1
Dec. 31
407 ETR
$
167.85
Jan. 1
Dec. 31
Travel Allowance
$
895.00
TOTAL
$
1,092.85
Conferences & Training - No Expenses
Hospitality and Protocol - No expenses
603
NICK SACCONE, Director, Restoration Services
Conferences & Training - No Expenses
Hospitality and Protocol
Jan -24
Business Travel
$ 53.93
Mar -06
Jan. 1
Dec. 31
Parking & Transit
$
311.22
Jan.1
Dec. 31
Airfare
$
-
Jan. 1
Dec. 31
407 ETR
$
665.30
Jan. 1
Dec. 31
Operating Cost of Assigned Vehicle
$
3,531.7
TOTAL
$
4,508.26
Conferences & Training - No Expenses
Hospitality and Protocol
Jan -24
Lunch Meeting with Terraprobe Limited
$ 53.93
Mar -06
Lunch at City Hall Meeting with Parks Forestry and Recreation City of
Toronto
$ 32.99
May -28
Meeting with City of Toronto Management
$ 13.00
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
TOTAL
$ 99.92
ROCCO SGAMBELLURI, Chief Financial Officer
Business Travel
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
Parking & Transit
$ 142.00
Jan.1 Dec. 31
Airfare
$ -
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
407 ETR
$ -
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
Travel Allowance
$553.00
TOTAL
$ 695.00
Conferences and Training
Nov -21 lCourse fee - Tax Update 2014 $ 383.07
TOTAL $ 383.07
Hospitality and Protocol - No expenses
CAROLYN WOODLAND, Director, Planning and Development
Business Travel
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
Parking & Transit
$ 278.75
Apr -23
Airfare to CIP Conference in Vancouver
$ 725.27
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
407 ETR
$ 349.83
Jan. 1 Dec. 31
Travel Allowance
$ 2,009.50
TOTAL
$ 3,363.35
Conferences and Training
May -01 ICIP Conference Registration $ 771.75
TOTAL $ 771.75
CATHERINE MACEWAN, Director, HR, Marketing and Communications
Business Travel - No Expenses
Conferences & Training - No Expenses
Hospitality and Protocol - No expenses
605
RES. #A244/13 - GOOD NEWS STORIES
Overview of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority activities from
October - December, 2013.
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT the summary of Good News Stories from October - December, 2013 be received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
As per Authority direction during 2006, a report covering highlights of Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority's (TRCA) activities for the preceding few months is provided to the
Authority every few months. The stories for October - December, 2013 are as follows:
October
• Premier Kathleen Wynne announced that the Province of Ontario is expanding its
world -class trails system as a key legacy initiative of the 2015 Pan Am and Parapan Am
Games, which will help complete 250 kilometres of trail gaps in Ontario's Trans Canada
Trail and connect communities from Ottawa to Windsor and Fort Erie to Huntsville. The
Province is investing more than $3.5 million in Pan Am /Parapan Am Trails to help create a
continuous trail of more than 2,000 kilometres, and TRCA will be receiving $100,000 to
complete 5.4 kilometres of a Trans Canada Trail gap on the Greenwood Conservation
Lands.
• The Multicultural Connections Program received $5,000 from TD Friends of the Environment
Foundation to pilot a project in Highland Creek called Growing a Connection: New
Canadians and Pollinator Plants. TRCA will use it to deliver an interactive biodiversity
presentation to adults enrolled in English language programs and help participants to grow
their own pollinator plants.
• Kortright hosted a Halloween themed event called Xreepy Kortright" where participants
(dressed in costumes) went on a haunted night hike, visited a campfire where spooky
legends were told, enjoyed Halloween crafts, goodies and activities, saw some live owls
and experienced a haunted maze. There were 97 participants over the 2 evenings.
• 60 people attended the Low Impact Development - Designing Infiltration Practices
workshop.
• Lakeview Waterfront Connection project plan received unanimous approval from Peel
Council.
• OMB accepted settlement agreement between TRCA, Pickering and the four developers for
the Seaton community.
• Hosted session for Early Childhood Education (ECE) professionals around nature -based
education for young children. Created draft vision which will be refined in November
meeting with sub - committee.
• The Partners in Project Green (PPG) Duke Out networking event was held with
approximately 120 people attending.
• PPG approved new membership structure and will begin recruiting new members starting
1h
November 5 for 2014.
• As part of its efforts to reach out to the aerospace community, PPG has welcomed Air
Canada to its membership.
• David Love to be recognized by the Association of Fundraising Professionals Greater
Toronto Chapter (the largest chapter in the world) with the Lifetime Achievement Award.
• $200,000 from Fisheries and Oceans Canada for Cell 2 Capping project announced. Peter
Kent has agreed to be the celebrity bird -a- thoner for TTP for next year.
• OMB accepted settlement agreement with Amexon Developments for 1200 Sheppard
Avenue East that will result in significant restoration and improved public access to the East
Don River valley.
November
• Won Innovation Award at Conservation Ontario's Fall Workshop for Seaton staircase and
trail counter program.
• Completed the Embayment D project in partnership with Toronto Port Authority. The
Project was delivered on budget, on time, and exceeded our quality expectation.
• TRCA completed the first stormwater management pond clean -out, as part of a new
partnership between TRCA and Toronto Water. The clean out and disposal was completed
well under budget and has saved the City $100,000.
• The Tommy Thompson Bird Research Station has exceeded its fall record by banding 4,496
birds totalling 7,499 birds for the year. The lab has become one of the most significant
stations in Canada.
• Staff contributed an article in Water Canada's November Magazine. This article described
some of the results of the recently published report on Urban Stream Syndrome in Toronto
streams and highlighted TRCA's Low Impact Development Guidebook and the recently
produced Greening Your Grounds Handbook.
• Staff has confirmed the first records of pickerel frog in the TRCA Jurisdiction. Several
individuals were found in North Peel during a wildlife road crossing assessment. These
records add to our understanding of regional biodiversity.
• The Living City Environmental Dinner raised approximately $125,000 gross.
• Staff has been trained on using an Environics tool research tool and a working group is
being established to drive coordination of effort, knowledge sharing and analysis for project
deliverables.
• TRCA staff presented 'Managing Water for Resilient, Healthy Neighbourhoods' and 'Source
Water Planning: Protecting Our Most Valuable Resource' at the Planning and Development
Forum on Adaptation, Resilience and Sustainability sponsored by Insight.
• Launching second Monarch Teacher Network of Canada national level teacher training
program, Voices From the Land, a workshop promoting ephemeral art, literacy and
presentation techniques.
• The TRCA Rec Committee has ramped up their efforts to promote TRCA team spirit with
great success. The "cookie grams" and pie throwing were a big hit (no pun intended) and
raised the needed funds to support our Foster child and children's Christmas party.
• Agreement signed to establish and operate a Tree Top Trekking course at Bruce's Mill.
• A number of Watershed Monitoring and Reporting staff has moved into the newly renovated
office space in the Earth Rangers Centre. This relocation improves efficiency for this team
and allows for additional staff in both the Boyd Office and Restoration Services Centre.
• SNAP program had international exposure when staff presented a paper at Water Sensitive
Urban Design conference in Australia, as well as to staff at Melbourne Water. Staff also
attended and participated in dialogue at the EcoDistricts Conference in Boston, USA.
• TRCA's eCommerce services have seen more than a 100% increase over 2012 with
approximately $450,000 in gross revenues for 2013.
• Region of Peel has agreed to provide courtesy waste and recycling pickup services for all
TRCA facilities located within the Region of Peel.
607
December
• Lower Mimico Creek Trail project will receive $500,000 toward build -out of the project. Land
behind property requires removal of a large retaining wall and regrading of the site, and the
owner has agreed to provide the funds for the work and is conveying the land to TRCA.
• Stewardship was awarded $10,000 from the City of Markham Environmental Sustainability
Fund to plan and implement a geocaching tour of LID demonstration sites at the Markham
Museum. The goal of this project is to educate Markham residents about LID and
encourage them to install these projects on their own properties.
• Ontario Power Authority has agreed to provide $500,000 for the BRE Innovation Park to be
located at The Living City Campus.
• The Draft Amended Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project
Environmental Assessment (EA) was submitted for agency and stakeholder review and
comment.
• The Draft Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA was submitted for agency and stakeholder
review and comment.
• The Region of Peel Channel Remediation Strategy evaluation approach and results for
Spring Creek were fully endorsed by the Technical Advisory Committee and stakeholders
on December 10, 2013. Direction was given to apply the evaluation approach to other
subwatersheds across Peel Region as well as to consider the merits of doing a detailed
cost - benefit analysis for pursuing natural channel design techniques versus more traditional
engineered methods. Implementation of phase one of the strategy in Spring Creek was
also supported and will be initiated by TRCA starting in 2014.
• Just before Christmas, Black Creek Pioneer Village showed off its seasonal cheer
nationwide on CBC's Steven and Chris show.
• Black Creek Historic Brewery launched the "Historic Beers of Canada" gift pack in the LCBO
to great acclaim. Each of the four beers represents a decade in the 19th century. "Louis
Riel's Dream," the latest of the historic ales, made its debut in the gift pack.
• The Ultimate Brewery Tour has been designated a prestigious Canadian Signature
Experience, one of only three in the Toronto area.
• TRCA staff has been invited to sit on an expert panel to work with the development
community in incorporating sustainable development practices into a large developing
property in Central Ottawa. Various sustainability themes will be explored, including low
impact development, renewable energy and affordable housing. City of Ottawa and
Rideau Valley Conservation Authority representatives, politicians from various levels and
others will be in attendance. The Sustainability Forum will take place on March 22, 2014.
• On December 5, 2013, Lincoln Electric hosted the second Energy Leaders Consortium
meeting. Representatives from the seven large industrial organizations set an annual energy
reduction target of 15,500 eMWh (equivalent megawatt hours) via the implementation of
innovative energy efficiency projects over the consortium duration. The greenhouse gas
emissions avoidances associated with this energy reduction are equivalent to annually
taking 543 cars off the road, or the energy consumed by 521 homes or the output from 14.1
MW of solar PV installations.
• The PPG Energy Leaders Consortium members were asked for their current projections for
3
utility savings. Together members projected that they would save 30,640 m of water. This
utility use avoidance will result in approximately $1.1 million in collective annual savings for
the consortium participants.
• � i
Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
For Information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Emails: kstranks @trca.on.ca
Date: January 13, 2014
RES. #A245 /13 - WATERSHED COMMITTEE MINUTES
Moved by: Dave Ryan
Seconded by: Gloria Lindsay Luby
THAT Section IV item AUTH8.4 - Watershed Committee Minutes, be received.
CARRIED
Section IV Item 8.4
DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL
Minutes of Meeting #5/13, held on October 17, 2013
ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION
Minutes of Meeting #2/13, held on SEptember 19, 2013
HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE
Minutes of Meeting #4/13, held on December 3, 2013
ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED
RES. #A246 /13 - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED
Moved by: Colleen Jordan
Seconded by: Jack Heath
THAT Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, items EX10.1 - EX10.3, contained in
Executive Committee Minutes #11/13, held on January 17, 2014, be received.
CARRIED
NEW BUSINESS
RES. #A247 /13 -
Moved by:
Seconded by:
DOGS OFF LEASH PARK
Downsview Dells
Maria Augimeri
Mike Mattos
THAT staff be directed to work with City of Toronto staff to investigate the feasibility of a
dogs off leash park in the Downsview Dells.
CARRIED
RES. #A248/13 - WORLD WILDLIFE FUND DATA
Moved by: Mike Mattos
Seconded by: Mujeeb Khan
THAT staff be directed to compare World Wildlife Fund data on the Humber River to
TRCA's data to determine if there is insufficient data or any discrepancies.
CARRIED
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:38 a.m., on Friday, January 31, 2014.
Maria Augimeri
Vice Chair
/ks
610
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Chair