HomeMy WebLinkAboutOak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan Addendum A (Macleod Estate Trail Linkage).pdf1
Addendum A: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage
Table of Contents
Addendum A: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage ................................................................... 4
A.1 Introduction & Study Area ......................................................................................... 4
A.1.1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 4
A.1.2 Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve ...................................................... 5
A.1.3 Study Area........................................................................................................ 10
A.1.4 Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan .................................................. 11
A.2 Trail Planning Process ............................................................................................ 14
A.2.1 Project Process ................................................................................................ 14
A.2.2 Engagement and Consultation ......................................................................... 15
A.2.2.1 TRCA Staff ................................................................................................. 15
A.2.2.2 Public ......................................................................................................... 15
A.3 Current Trail System & Conditions .......................................................................... 20
A.3.1 Existing Trails ................................................................................................... 20
A.3.1.1 Primary Trail .............................................................................................. 23
A.3.1.2 Secondary Trails ........................................................................................ 23
A.3.2 Existing Access and Amenities ......................................................................... 24
A.4 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Concept ................................................................... 27
A.4.1 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Goals ................................................................. 27
A.4.2 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Alignment .......................................................... 28
A.4.2.1 General Trail Experience ........................................................................... 28
A.4.2.2 Slope Characteristics ................................................................................. 32
A.4.2.3 Property Ownership ................................................................................... 32
A.4.3 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Design ............................................................... 35
A.4.4 Trail Amenities .................................................................................................. 35
A.4.4.1 Trailhead Signage ...................................................................................... 35
A.4.4.2 Postmarkers ............................................................................................... 36
A.4.4.3 Benches ..................................................................................................... 36
A.4.4.4 Interpretive Signage ................................................................................... 36
Attachment 1
2
A.4.4.5 Planting ...................................................................................................... 37
A.4.4.6 Fencing ...................................................................................................... 37
A.4.5 Accessibility ...................................................................................................... 38
A.4.5.1 Slope Improvements .................................................................................. 39
A.4.5.2 Paved Surface Area ................................................................................... 40
A.4.6 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Management ..................................................... 40
A.5 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Budget ..................................................................... 42
References: ................................................................................................................... 42
Addendum A: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage List of Figures
Figure A1: Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve Map
Figure A2: Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve Location Map
Figure A3: Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve Areas of Natural and Scientific
Interest and Provincially Significant Wetlands
Figure A4: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Study Area
Figure A5: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Study Area Trail Map
Figure A6: Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve Trail Map
Figure A7: Regional Trail Map
Figure A8: ORCCR Spine Trail
Figure A9: ORCCR Secondary Trail
Figure A10: Existing Trail Access and Amenities
Figure A11: ORCCR Trailhead Kiosk
Figure A12: Stone Slab Bench
Figure A13: ORCCR Postmarker
Figure A14: Educational Sign Example
Figure A15: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Proposed Trail Map (Conceptual Alignment)
Figure A16: Bird’s Eye View of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Conceptual Alignment
Figure A17: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Proposed Trail Map Close Up (Conceptual
Alignment).
Figure A18: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Proposed Trail Map (Conceptual Alignment)
Longitudinal Slope Characteristics
Figure A19: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Proposed Trail Map (Conceptual Alignment)
Property Parcels
3
Figure A20: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Proposed Trail Map (Conceptual Alignment)
Longitudinal Slope Issue Areas
Addendum A: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage List of Tables
Table A1: Existing Trail Network (excluding the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage)
Table A2: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Design Standards
4
Addendum A: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage
A.1 Introduction & Study Area
A.1.1 Introduction
Since the approval of the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan in 2006 and the
establishment of a trail system within the Oak Ridges Corridor Park (ORCP) lands,
urban development has increased substantially around the ORCP property. When the
Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan was approved in 2006 the Macleod’s
Landing neighbourhood located at Jefferson Sideroad and Yonge Street was not fully
established. This new neighbourhood has now grown to over 1000 homes, including the
Macleod’s Landing Public School. There is no trail linkage from this neighbourhood into
the Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve (ORCCR) trail network1. Local
advocacy by residents of the Macleod’s Landing neighbourhood has expressed the
desire for a direct, safe trail connection from this relatively new neighbourhood to the
trail network within the ORCCR.
To adapt the existing trail network to this newly identified community desire, TRCA
undertook a public planning process from approximately October 2017 to June 2018 to
assess the feasibility for a new trail connection from the Macleod’s Landing
neighbourhood to the existing ORCCR trail network. The new trail connection would be
known for the purposes of this trail planning process as the “Macleod Estate Trail
Linkage.” This planning process included the development of multiple trail alignment
alternatives based on ecological and cultural constraints, gathering feedback on these
alternatives, the determination of a preferred conceptual trail alignment, and the
assessment of opportunities for trail amenities. The planning process included input
from TRCA technical staff, the Town of Richmond Hill, key public interest groups
through a Public Advisory Committee, and the general public.
This Addendum to the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan reflects the results
of this public planning process. The Addendum describes the study area context and
the existing trail system into which the future Macleod Estate Trail Linkage will integrate.
It describes the public planning process that was undertaken, and engagement
techniques that were employed to seek input into this process. The Addendum
describes a design concept for the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage, including a conceptual
alignment, general design standards, trail amenities, and opportunities for design
1 It should be noted that a series of land use and land management changes have occurred since the
approval of the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan in 2006. The lands formerly known as the
ORCP are now intended to be managed cohesively with approximately 175 hectares (ha) of TRCA-
owned property to the immediate east of the lands formerly known as the ORCP. Both properties are now
known collectively as the Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve. This Addendum recognizes and
describes this new management context.
5
interventions to enhance trail accessibility. Finally, recommendations for the
management of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage are included and a budget is outlined.
Guided by this Addendum, a detailed design process will be undertaken for the Macleod
Estate Trail Linkage that will address the technical details, engineering works, and siting
of trail amenities needed to begin the construction of the trail.
A.1.2 Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve
Immediately adjacent to the 428 hectares that form the ORCP, TRCA owns
approximately 175 hectares of greenspace lands east of Bayview Avenue. Referred to
as the Oak Ridges Corridor Park East (ORCPE) property, these lands are dominated by
natural cover and consist of many unique and sensitive natural features. A management
plan was completed for the ORCPE in 2011 (Oak Ridges Corridor Park East
Management Plan). The majority of the property within the ORCPE is owned by the
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, with the exception of two parcels owned by
the Province of Ontario (See Figure A1). The two parcels owned by the Province were
addressed in the management plan developed for the ORCP in 2006; however, for the
purposes of management zones, management recommendations and trail planning,
they are now considered part of the ORCPE area.
It is the intent of TRCA and the Province that the main ORCP and the ORCPE lands be
managed cohesively. Following the completion of the ORCPE Management Plan, the
ORCP and the ORCPE were combined into ORCCR (See Figure A1). Restoration
activities and trail development should consider the properties together as one area,
and projects for the Reserve should be managed cohesively to allow TRCA to more
effectively streamline work.
Together, the ORCCR properties form 603 hectares of prime Oak Ridges Moraine
landscape on the natural boundary between the Humber River and Rouge River
watersheds in the Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York (see Figure
A2). The ORCCR is located west of Leslie Street, south of Bethesda Sideroad, east of
Bathurst Street, and north of Jefferson Sideroad and Stouffville Road.
The ORCCR is a rich natural area consisting of forest and successional forest areas,
wetlands, waterbodies, meadows, agricultural fields, a golf course, approximately 17.1
km of popular recreational trails, and some notable cultural heritage features. The site
contributes to a large forest complex, including the Jefferson Forest Area of Natural and
Scientific Interest to the southeast. Bond Lake has been identified as an Area of Natural
and Scientific Interest, and Bond Lake along with Philips Lake, Thompson Lake and
other kettle waterbodies within the site form part of the provincially significant Philips-
Bond-Thompson Wetland complex (See Figure A3). Bond Lake, Philips Lake and
Jefferson Forest all support regionally- and locally-rare species. The site contributes a
6
diversity of high quality and sensitive habitats to the ecosystem functions of the
headwater region.
Urban development has increased substantially around the ORCCR in the past decade,
and there are housing developments immediately adjacent to the boundary of the
Reserve in multiple locations. The areas south of King Road, north of Jefferson
Sideroad, and around Old Colony Road are especially developed. Richmond Hill’s
population continues to rise, and—pending development in the area surrounding the
ORCCR along Leslie Street—will increase impact on the Reserve.
7
Figure A1: Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve Map
8
Figure A2: Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve Location Map
9
Figure A3: Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve Areas of Natural and Scientific
Interest and Provincially Significant Wetlands
10
A.1.3 Study Area
The study area for the MacLeod Estate Trail Linkage project is in the southwestern
portion of the ORCCR, generally in the area surrounding Philips Lake. This area is
within the ORCP property (See Figure A4). There are approximately 3.5 km of existing
authorized trails in this area. Trail planning is focused within this area, though the
surrounding context of this study area is examined as well to inform trail development
and management decision-making.
Figure A4: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Study Area
11
A.1.4 Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan
At TRCA Board Authority Meeting #8/06, on October 27, 2006, the Oak Ridges Corridor
Park Management Plan was approved through Resolution #A235/06:
“THAT the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan, prepared by AMEC
Earth and Environmental dated August 2006, be approved;
THAT copies of the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan be sent to the
members of the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan Advisory
Committee with a request that the document be endorsed and they consider
opportunities for providing multi-year funding to support the implementation of the
plan, and operation of the park;
THAT staff assist with the establishment of an Oak Ridges Corridor Park
Advisory Committee made up of interested citizens, interest groups and
organizations, to help with the implementation of the management plan;
THAT the province be requested to approve the official name of the park as
"Kettle Lakes Nature Reserve at Richmond Hill";
THAT approval be granted to enter into agreements with the Province of Ontario
and the current Oak Ridges Corridor Park land owners to maintain and protect
the completed trail on an interim basis and until the lands are conveyed to the
Province of Ontario;
AND FURTHER THAT appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
take such action as is necessary to implement the agreements including
obtaining any necessary approvals and execution of documents.”
Section 6.0 of the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan provides guidance for
trail planning and development on the property. Regarding secondary trails, the
Management Plan states:
“Secondary trails are proposed to link the neighbouring communities to the spine
trail; the total length of proposed secondary trails is 2.8 km. People living
adjacent to open space have a natural desire to access these areas. If formal
access points are not provided, residents will make their own paths which can be
much more detrimental to the sensitive environments than a formalized path in a
pre-determined location.”
When the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan was approved in 2006, the
Macleod’s Landing neighbourhood near the Macleod Estate at Jefferson Sideroad and
Yonge Street was not fully established. This new neighbourhood now contains
approximately 1000 homes and the MacLeod’s Landing Public School; however, there
12
is no trail linkage from this area of the neighbourhood into the ORCCR trail network.
The lack of a trail connection creates the risk of informal trails, as the neighbourhood
has expressed eagerness for an additional safe, direct trail linkage within the study area
into the ORCCR. Existing informal trails from the Macleod’s Landing neighbourhood
have been inventoried within the study area (See Figure A5).
13
Figure A5: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Study Area Trail Map
14
A.2 Trail Planning Process
The public planning process for the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage was undertaken within
an ecosystem framework and in consultation with TRCA staff, key public stakeholders,
and the general public to ensure watershed health, public enjoyment and environmental
sustainability. The project was managed under the broader umbrella of the “Oak Ridges
Corridor Conservation Reserve Trail Planning Projects,” which was concerned with both
the Cycling on Secondary Trails project and the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage project 2.
A.2.1 Project Process
The planning process was undertaken in three phases:
Phase 1: Initial Site Scoping and Evaluation
• Inventory ORCCR physical environment, natural environment, land use context
in the study areas
• Inventory existing ORCCR trails in the study areas
Phase 2: Trail Planning
• Establish a TRCA staff Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), host meeting
• Establish a Public Advisory Committee (PAC), host meeting
• Initiate on-line engagement (TRCA YourSay Engagement Website)
• Develop and evaluate trail alignment alternatives for the Macleod Estate Trail
Linkage, including trail connections to the ORCCR main spine trail and
supporting trail amenities, such as parking, signage and resting areas
• Host a Public Engagement Session
• Consult on pedestrian and cycling trails with the Town of Richmond Hill
Accessibility Advisory Committee
• Host meeting with the TAC and the PAC
• Develop management recommendations for the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage
• Drafting and finalization of the Addendum to the Oak Ridges Corridor Park
Management Plan
2 The Cycling on Secondary Trails Project intends to evaluate and plan for changes to cycling uses within
the ORCCR trail system, primarily focusing on mountain biking trails within the ORCPE property. While
the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Project and the Cycling on Secondary Trails Project were initiated
simultaneously, the timeline for the Cycling on Secondary Trails project will extend further than the
culmination of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Project. This longer timeline is due to the need for
additional fieldwork and focused discussion with key interest groups. A further Addendum to the Oak
Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan will be prepared at the completion of the Cycling on Secondary
Trails Project.
15
Phase 3: Trail Plan Endorsement
• Obtain Authority approval for the Addendum to the Oak Ridges Corridor Park
Management Plan
• Obtain Oak Ridges Trail Association endorsement of the Addendum to the Oak
Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan
• Circulate the Addendum to the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan to
Infrastructure Ontario
A.2.2 Engagement and Consultation
Engagement with TRCA staff, external key interest groups, and the general public was
critical to the planning process for the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage.
A.2.2.1 TRCA Staff
A TAC was formed to gain input and feedback from internal TRCA staff. This TAC
included representation from various departments including Land Management,
Planning Ecology, Terrestrial Natural Heritage, Archeology and Cultural Heritage,
Planning & Development, Watershed Strategies, Restoration Projects, Resource
Management Projects, Enforcement & Compliance, Parks & Culture, and Bathurst Glen
Golf Course.
The TAC convened twice during the course of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage
planning process to discuss opportunities and constraints, trail alternative alignments,
trail amenities, programming, and implementation. Meetings were held on January 17,
2018 and on March 22, 2018. Input on specific issues was aslo sought informally from
TAC members. Key input provided by the TAC included the ecological buffers and
constraints necessary to incorporate into decision-making for the trail alignment,
appropriate design specifications and plantings, identification of drainage issues, and
maintenance issues that could arise with certain potential trail amenities.
A.2.2.2 Public
Public engagement was undertaken through a multidimensional approach. A smaller
PAC sought focused input from key interest groups, and broader public engagement
techniques enabled more general feedback from the broader community. On-line,
traditional media, and face-to-face communication methods were employed to provide
information about the project and seek relevant input.
Public Advisory Committee
A Public Advisory Committee was formed to gain input and feedback from key external
interest groups. The PAC included representation from The Regional Municipality of
York, the Town of Richmond Hill, the Oak Ridges Trail Association, the Durham
Mountain Biking Association, The Gordon & Patricia Gray Animal Welfare Foundation,
16
and interested residents. The Committee met twice over the course of the project to
discuss opportunities and constraints, trail alternative alignments, trail amenities,
programming, and implementation. Meetings were held on January 19, 2018 and April
6, 2018. The PAC was concerned with both ORCCR Trail Planning Projects (the
Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Project and the Cycling on Secondary Trails Project). Key
input provided by the PAC included underscoring the need to prevent trail access to
Philips Lake to preserve ecological value, recommendations for incorporating planting
buffers into the trail design, the need to incorporate design to enhance trail accessibility
for a wide variety of users, and suggestions for trail amenities and programming that
promote ecological stewardship.
It should be noted that while the Philips Lake Stewardship Panel is not active and
therefore could not be engaged through this public planning process, the PAC included
many of the individuals who would likely make up this committee. This PAC included
many of the same groups who had participated in the PAC convened for the Oak
Ridges Corridor Park East Management Plan.
Online Engagement
An online web presence for the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage planning process was
launched on December 21, 2017. An engagement webpage was created through the
TRCA YourSay platform, which could communicate key project dates, project updates,
distribute supporting documents and photos, advertise upcoming events, and enable
users to provide feedback on key elements of the trail plan though an online survey and
online comment forms. Users could also subscribe to email updates about the project.
The YourSay page covered both the Cycling on Secondary Trails Project and the
Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Project. Text was added to the Oak Ridges Corridor
Conservation Reserve TRCA webpage to notify visitors about ongoing ORCCR trail
planning projects, and to direct visitors to the YourSay page for further engagement in
the projects.
A general ORCCR online trail user survey was launched on December 21, 2017. The
questions were intended to obtain a general sense of how trail users access the
ORCCR, how they are using the trails, when and how often they visit, the purpose of
their visit, what they like and dislike about the trail system, etc. A total of 112 responses
were collected between December 19, 2017 and May 8, 2018. Some key findings from
the survey indicate that most respondents access the ORCCR by car, that Stouffville
Road, Jefferson Sideroad, and Old Colony Road are the most popular access points,
that most respondents visit once per week for between one and three hours on
weekend mornings, most respondents participate in hiking and mountain biking, and
overall respondents rated their trail experiences at 8/10.
17
Public Engagement Session
A Public Engagement Session was held on February 22, 2018, at the Oak Ridges
Community Centre (12895 Bayview Ave, Richmond Hill). The Public Engagement
Session was concerned with both ORCCR Trail Planning Projects. Materials related to
the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Project presented to the public included contextual
information on the entire ORCCR trail system, two conceptual alignment options for the
proposed Macleod Estate Trail Linkage, study area ecological constraints, and
perspective artistic renderings and cross-sections. The materials were mounted on
display boards and presented in an open house format, where attendees were free to
circulate around the space and view the materials at their own pace. Project team
members from TRCA and the Town of Richmond Hill were available to answer
questions from attendees in an informal manner.
The Public Engagement Session was advertised through both online and physical
tactics. A flyer was distributed via Canada Post’s neighbourhood mail to approximately
1764 addresses (1734 homes, 30 businesses), and this flyer was also posted at the
Oak Ridges Community Centre, the Bond Lake Arena, and the Oak Ridges Moraine
Public Library. The flyer was also included in a Macleod’s Landing Public School
newsletter. A newspaper ad promoting the Public Engagement Session was issued in
the February 15, 2018 edition of the Richmond Hill Liberal newspaper. The Session was
promoted through word-of-mouth at a TRCA Snowshoeing event on February 10, 2018.
The Public Engagement Session was advertised through the online TRCA events
calendar and the Town of Richmond Hill online bulletin board. Tweets were sent from
the @TRCA_Trails Twitter account to promote the session, which were retweeted
through the @YorkRegionGovt York Region Transportation Services Twitter account.
An email blast was sent through the Oak Ridges Trail Association’s email distribution list
on February 14th, 2018. An email was sent out to people who had requested to
subscribe for email project updates through the YourSay Engagement website. Details
on the Public Engagement Session were posted to the ORCCR Trail Planning Projects
YourSay Engagement website, and many of the marketing tactics employed to promote
the Session directed people to the YourSay website to find out more about the event
and the ORCCR Trail Planning Projects generally.
It is estimated that 69 people attended the Session. Feedback forms were distributed to
session attendees, inviting them to choose the conceptual trail alternative alignment
they preferred (and explain why), and describe the trail amenities and features they
would like to see along the proposed new trail linkage. There were also large-format
maps of the trail alternatives available for attendees to annotate with their comments.
Broadly, there was community interest and support for the Macleod Estate Trail
Linkage, with questions as to how the trail would interact with Philips Lake, what type of
landscapes the trail would pass through, and what type of trail would be built. Local
18
residents were generally supportive and excited about the direct trail connection into the
ORCCR. There was concentrated, rational, yet firm opposition for the proposed trail
alignment from a few residents whose properties are situated adjacent to the location of
the proposed trail, citing concerns over privacy, safety, environmental impact, and
constructability of the proposed trail. The day after the Public Engagement Session, the
materials from the Session were posted on the YourSay website, and an online
questionnaire was posted asking the same questions as the feedback forms distributed
at the Session. This online comment period continued for approximately 2 weeks and
allowed people who were not able to attend the Public Engagement Session to provide
their feedback.
An on-site meeting was scheduled with TRCA technical staff and the residents who had
expressed their opposition to the plan at the Public Engagement Session on May 15,
2018, in an effort to address their concerns during the detailed design process. At the
site visit the neighbours raised many of the same concerns as at the Public
Engagement Session. They expressed concern for the security of their homes because
the trail alignment is proposed so close to the rear yards of their properties. TRCA staff
noted that they have not heard of any cases of people jumping fences into residential
properties to commit crimes in any other areas in the TRCA jurisdiction where trails are
in close proximity to residential properties. The neighbours also relayed that at the time
they bought their homes, they were promised by the developer and the Town of
Richmond Hill that their view into the ORCCR would remain undisturbed. The
neighbours in attendance expressed concern for the environmental protection of Philips
Lake and the surrounding area. TRCA staff discussed some trail design measures that
could mitigate these issues, such as buffer plantings and fencing. The neighbours also
raised concerns over the impact this trail could have on the value of their properties and
historical political decision-making to re-open the approval of a previous Town of
Richmond Hill trail alignment along the remnant silver maple carriageway from Silver
Maple Road to Macleod Estate Court. TRCA staff reviewed the tentative plan approval
and implementation commencement with the neighbours. It was suggested that the
neighbours could provide a delegation when TRCA seeks approval of the Macleod
Estate Trail Linkage Plan to have their concerns heard by the TRCA Board.
At the Public Engagement Session, the sign-in sheet allowed people to provide their
email to request to be added to the list of subscribers for email project updates. An
email blast was sent to the whole list of project subscribers on July 6, 2018, including
people who subscribed via the YourSay Engagement Website, notifying people of the
July 20 TRCA Board Meeting to approve the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage.
19
Town of Richmond Hill Accessibility Advisory Committee
The Ontario Regulation 191/11: Integrated Accessibility Standards (under Accessibility
for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, S.O. 2005, c.11), in “Section 80.8: Consultation,
recreational trails”, states:
“(1) Obligated organizations shall consult on the following before they construct
new or redevelop existing recreational trails:
1. The slope of the trail.
2. The need for, and location of, ramps on the trail.
3. The need for, location and design of,
i. rest areas,
ii. passing areas,
iii. viewing areas,
iv. amenities on the trail, and
v. any other pertinent feature. O. Reg. 413/12, s. 6.
(2) Obligated organizations shall consult on the matters referred to in subsection
(1) in the following manner:
1. Obligated organizations must consult with the public and persons with
disabilities.
2. Municipalities must also consult with their municipal accessibility advisory
committees, where one has been established in accordance with subsection 29
(1) or (2) of the Act. O. Reg. 413/12, s. 6.”
To fulfill these requirements, members of the project team attended a Town of
Richmond Hill Accessibility Advisory Committee on March 28, 2018 to present the
conceptual alignment for the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage and gain feedback from
Committee members. Concern was expressed by the Committee regarding the granular
limestone fine trail surface. It was noted that the trail surface should be firm and stable
enough to prevent wheelchair wheels from slipping or becoming stuck, and pavement
as a trail surface was suggested. There was also concern raised over extended lengths
of trail with 5-8% slope (30m). A switchback and/or rest areas at appropriate intervals
should be considered to address this issue. It was noted that the trail width should be
wide enough for wheelchair passing. It was also noted that signage should be
accessible for those with visual disabilities. As a more general comment regarding the
20
ORCCR trail system, it was suggested that trail improvements should be made to
recognize aging population demographics; for example more washroom facilities should
be integrated into the ORCCR trail system. Another general comment mentioned
erosion issues that have been emerging on the existing ORCCR trail system, and that
these maintenance issues need to be addressed for both the existing trail network and
for the future Macleod Estate Trail Linkage. Efforts have been made to address many of
these concerns within the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Concept (see Section A4).
A.3 Current Trail System & Conditions
A.3.1 Existing Trails
The existing authorized ORCCR trail network includes a “spine trail”, which is the
primary multi-use trail offering an east-west link through the Reserve, and secondary
trails which are intended to link neighboring communities to the spine trail and create
loops for recreational enjoyment (see Figure A6). The authorized existing trail system
within the study area consists of a section of the primary multi-use spine trail and two
secondary trail sections (see Figure A5). The ORCCR trail network also includes
linkages to regional trail networks - the Lake-to-Lake Cycling Route and Walking Trail
alignment runs through the ORCCR, and this alignment connects with the Oak Ridges
Trail directly north of the Reserve. A large section of spine trail is also a designated
section of the Oak Ridges Trail Network. Thus, the ORCCR is linked to 121 km of Lake-
to-Lake Cycling Route and Walking Trail, and over 350 km of trails that comprise the
Oak Ridges Trail network (see Figure A7).
Table A1: Existing Trail Network (excluding the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage)
Existing ORCCR Trail
Network
Existing Macleod Estate Trail
Linkage Study Area Trail Network
Spine Trail 9620 m 2327 m
Secondary Trail 7527 m 1137 m
Total 17147 m 3464 m
21
Figure A6: Oak Ridges Corridor Conservation Reserve Trail Map
22
Figure A7: Regional Trail Map
23
A.3.1.1 Primary Trail
The primary multi-use spine trail runs generally east-west through the ORCCR property,
from Bathurst Street in the southwest to Bethesda Sideroad in the northeast. The spine
trail is designated as a side trail of the Oak Ridges Trail Network.
The primary trail is designed for a relatively high volume of use, and therefore the trail
width and construction is substantial enough to allow safe passing, along with a
consistent and even surface. The primary trail is constructed to a maximum width of 2.4
m and surfaced with compacted granular limestone fines on a compacted granular base
(see Figure A8). The granular base is to be constructed to a maximum width of 3 m. A
geogrid web is employed to distribute the weight of the soil compaction evenly. The
alignment of the spine trail has been carefully selected to follow the height of the land
and minimize grade changes, thereby providing a trail experience that will be accessible
to a wide range of users (see Section 6.2).
Appropriate, nature-based public uses are permitted along trails including hiking,
walking, cross-country skiing, leashed dog-walking, and cycling. Based on the results of
the online ORCCR trail user survey launched alongside this public planning process,
hiking and cycling are the most prevalent trail activities.
Figure A8: ORCCR Spine Trail
A.3.1.2 Secondary Trails
Secondary trails serve two functions in the trail system: to link the neighbouring
communities to the primary trail, and to provide loop trails for recreational enjoyment.
24
People living adjacent to open space have a natural desire to access these areas. If
formal access points are not provided, residents often make their own paths, which can
be much more detrimental to sensitive environments than a formalized path in a pre-
determined location. As these secondary trails are providing access to local residents, a
more moderate level of use is anticipated and therefore, it is possible to accommodate
users on paths that are narrower than the spine trail (See Figure A9). A maximum width
of 2 m with a granular surface is recommended for these trails (see Section 6.3).
Figure A9: ORCCR Secondary Trail
A.3.2 Existing Access and Amenities
Currently, the closest trail access points to the ORCCR trail system within the study
area are the entrance from Jefferson Sideroad near Lake Forest Drive, and from Yonge
Street near Bond Lake (see Figure A10). It was expressed by a number of local
residents that these access points are too far to be useful to them, and additionally
walking up Yonge Street to the Yonge Street trail access is not safe due to high
volumes of fast-moving motor vehicle traffic, with limited, to non-existent sidewalks.
The ORCCR trail system includes trail amenities that improve the trail user experience
through enhanced user comfort, wayfinding, or interpretation opportunities. The current
suite of trail amenities for the ORCCR includes trailhead kiosks, wooden postmarkers,
and stone slab benches. Kiosks, benches, and postmarkers are sited based on ease of
access, safety, and field-fit onsite. Trail signage and amenities are developed based on
the guidance of the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan. This plan (see
Section 6.8.5) recommends interpretive/educational signage may be installed at specific
natural or cultural
25
Figure A10: Existing Trail Access and Amenities
26
feature areas along the trail. Themes include wildlife and natural ecosystems,
landscape or human heritage. See Figures A11 – A14 for examples of existing trail
amenities within or near the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage study area.
Figure A11: ORCCR Trailhead Kiosk Figure A12: Stone Slab Bench
Figure A13: ORCCR Postmarker Figure A14: Educational Sign Example
27
A.4 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Concept
A.4.1 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Goals
The goals of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage mirror the goals of the existing Oak
Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan:
“1. To support the implementation of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act
by contributing to the protection, restoration and enhancement of the Moraine’s
ecological functions, protecting water quality and quantity, maintaining the
integrity of the continuous natural system and fostering partnerships for
stewardship.
2. To address the challenge of sustaining a sanctuary for nature in an urban
setting by including public uses that provide opportunities for passive recreation,
linkages to the Oak Ridges Trail, and experiential learning, while protecting the
environmental integrity of the park.”
Within Section 6.0, the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan provides more
specific direction as to the purpose of Secondary Trails (Section 6.3), and how these
trails can contribute to the goals of the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan:
“Secondary trails are proposed to link the neighbouring communities to the spine
trail; the total length of proposed secondary trails is 2.8 km. People living
adjacent to open space have a natural desire to access these areas. If formal
access points are not provided, residents will make their own paths which can be
much more detrimental to the sensitive environments than a formalized path in a
pre-determined location.”
When the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan was approved in 2006, the
Macleod’s Landing neighbourhood was not fully established. This new neighbourhood
now contains approximately 1000 homes and the Macleod’s Landing Public School, and
the neighbourhood residents have expressed eagerness for a trail linkage into the
Reserve within the study area. The lack of a trail connection coupled with the identified
desire for access to the ORCCR trail network creates the risk of informal trails. These
informal trails would likely not be developed with the technical input necessary to ensure
protection of the surrounding environment. Therefore, without a more sustainable trail
alternative, informal trails which degrade the integrity of the surrounding ecology are at
risk of proliferating.
The Macleod Estate Trail Linkage will provide a trail connection from the Macleod’s
Landing neighbourhood into the ORCCR trail system that has been designed
intentionally and sustainably. The new trail alignment has been designed recognizing
relevant ecological buffers, such as setbacks from the area of the Provincially significant
28
Philips-Bond-Thompson Wetland complex. The trail alignment has been developed with
the input of TRCA technical staff with knowledge of the area and the sensitivities of the
surrounding environment.
The proposed new trail connection is intended to function as a neighbourhood
connection and will serve a wide variety of users, providing enhanced access to the
natural beauty of the Moraine landscape within the ORCCR in a sustainable, intentional
manner. The trail opens further opportunities for passive recreation, which provides
mental and physical health benefits. Enhancing opportunities for the neighbourhood to
connect to this engaging and scenic greenspace also fosters local stewardship, as
residents will be able to experience and value the ORCCR as a part of their day-to-day
lives.
A.4.2 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Alignment
The conceptual alignment for the new Macleod Estate Trail Linkage can be seen on
Figure A15. The new trail will be approximately 798 m, having a width of 1.8 m, and will
be classified as a secondary trail.
A.4.2.1 General Trail Experience
From the ORCCR spine trail, the new trail will pass eastwards through meadow area
and new-growth conifer plantations, before turning southwards through thicker
plantation forest before reaching a fence that surrounds the majority of Philips Lake.
The trail will continue past this fence along a strip of open meadow in between the
forest that surrounds Philips Lake and the fence-line of neigbouring properties. The trail
will then pass near the Macleod Estate residence before turning sharply eastwards
along a remnant carriageway lined with silver maples and connecting to Silver Maple
Road. A bird’s eye view of this conceptual trail alignment may be seen in Figure A16
A detailed view of the conceptual trail alignment can be seen on Figure A17. Minor
variations from this alignment may occur during the detailed design and construction of
the trail based on on-site landscape barriers or opportunities for improvements in slope
sustainability.
29
Figure A15: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Proposed Trail Map (Conceptual Alignment)
30
Figure A16: Bird’s Eye View of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Conceptual Alignment
31
Figure A17: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Proposed Trail Map Close Up (Conceptual
Alignment).
32
A.4.2.2 Slope Characteristics
The longitudinal slope profile of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage, as calculated from
the conceptual trail alignment3, is gentle relative to the ORCP trail network 4. Calculated
over 10 m sections of trail, the maximum longitudinal slope of the Macleod Estate Trail
Linkage conceptual alignment is 9.81% and the typical longitudinal slope is 2.57% (see
Figure 18). Where the longitudinal slope of the trail exceeds 5%, efforts will be made
during at the detailed design and implementation stages to find opportunities—through
minor trail alignment adjustments—to reduce the trail’s longitudinal slope. As the slope
profile for the conceptual Macleod Estate Trail Linkage is based on a desktop exercise
over 10 m intervals, a more detailed slope profile will be created based on the as-built
trail alignment with TRCA’s High-Efficiency Trail Assessment Process (HETAP)
equipment. This more detailed longitudinal slope profile will be used for future trail
signage purposes.
A.4.2.3 Property Ownership
Based on current land ownership arrangements and the conceptual alignment for the
new Macleod Estate Trail Linkage, approximately 193 m of trail is located on land
owned by the Town of Richmond Hill, approximately 57 m of trail is located on land
owned privately, and approximately 546 m of trail is located on land owned by the
Province of Ontario (ORCCR) and managed by TRCA (See Figure A19).
3 The longitudinal slope calculations for the conceptual trail alignment are based on a desktop Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) exercise. The trail alignment line was converted to a series of points every 10
m. The longitudinal slopes in between these points were calculated, thus providing longitudinal slopes in
10 m sections for the trail alignment. The maximum longitudinal slope is the highest longitudinal slope out
of these 10m sections, and the average longitudinal slope is the average of the longitudinal slopes of
these 10m sections. This methodology will thus not capture micro scale variations of longitudinal slope
within these 10m sections.
4 The ORCP Primary and Secondary Trails, viewed together, have a typical longitudinal slope of 3.8%
and a maximum longitudinal slope of 26.6%
33
Figure A18: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Proposed Trail Map (Conceptual Alignment)
Longitudinal Slope Characteristics
34
Figure A19: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Proposed Trail Map (Conceptual Alignment)
Property Parcels
35
A.4.3 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Design
The design standards of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage are generally consistent with
the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan Section 6.1.
The general design standards of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage are based to the as-
built design details of precedent secondary trail linkages constructed since the approval
of the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan. The general design standards for
the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage are described in Table A2 below:
Table A2: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Design Standards
Trail Design Standards
Trail Tread Width 1.8 m
Trail Clearing Width 2.4 m
Trail Clearing Height 3.5 m
Trail Surfacing
Compacted limestone granular fines on a
compacted granular base, for enhanced
accessibility pavement may be considered
for the portion of trail along the remnant
silver maple carriageway (See Figure A20)
A.4.4 Trail Amenities
A.4.4.1 Trailhead Signage
A trailhead kiosk will be incorporated into the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage. This
structure will be designed to match the construction of existing trailhead kiosks
throughout the ORCCR trail system (see Figure A11). It is recommended that the
trailhead kiosk be sited at the entrance to the ORCCR in the portion of the trail along the
remnant silver maple carriageway, although the precise location of the trailhead kiosk
will be determined through the detailed trail design process.
Signage posted on the trailhead will be generally consistent with guidelines provided in
the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan Section 6.8. All signage posted on
these trailhead kiosks will conform to the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act
(2005) Regulation 191/11: Section 80.9 (Technical requirements for trails, general).
36
A.4.4.2 Postmarkers
Postmarkers will be incorporated into the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage. These
postmarkers will be designed to match the construction of existing postmarks along the
broader ORCCR trail system (see Figure A13).
The siting and design of these postmarkers will be generally consistent with the
guidance provided within the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan Section
6.8.2, although the precise location of the postmarkers will be determined through the
detailed trail design process and field-fit during construction.
A.4.4.3 Benches
Benches will be incorporated into the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage. These benches will
be designed to match the construction of existing benches along the broader ORCCR
trail system (see Figure A12). The siting of benches along the Macleod Estate Trail
Linkage shall be designed to enhance trail accessibility for a wide variety of users,
including seniors and persons with disabilities. Benches can also be located at
viewpoints or places of interest. The precise number and location of benches will be
determined through the detailed design process.
The provision of benches will be generally consistent with the guidance provided in the
Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan Section 6.1.
A.4.4.4 Interpretive Signage
Interpretive Signage is recommended to be incorporated into the Macleod Estate Trail
Linkage, highlighting the ecological importance of Philips Lake and/or the cultural
heritage value of the Macleod Estate (or Drynoch Estate) and the associated silver-
maple lined carriageway.
The Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan Section 4.1 notes that Philips Lake
supports locally and regionally rare species. Philips Lake is also part of the Provincially
significant Philips-Bond-Thompson wetland complex, and is relatively undisturbed as
compared to Bond Lake, the other major ORCCR waterbody. Interpretive signage along
the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage could describe the ecological features of Philips Lake
and its ecological importance, explaining why it is essential to limit disturbance to the
Lake. These proposed interpretive signs could provide important opportunities to foster
environmental stewardship.
The Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan Section 3.4.1 notes that the Macleod
Estate (Drynoch Estate) is an important cultural heritage feature significant for its
associative and architectural value. The Estate residence and the silver maple
carriageway associated with the Estate have both been designated under the Ontario
Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990 for their design and associative value (Town of Richmond
Hill, 2016). Interpretive signage along the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage could describe
37
the history and significance of the Macleod Estate and the silvery maple carriageway,
explaining how the Estate is linked to the broader history of Canada.
Any interpretive signs incorporated into the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage shall be
designed to be generally consistent with the Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management
Plan Section 6.8.5. These interpretive signs will also take guidance from the
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (2005) Regulation 191/11: Section 80.9
(Technical requirements for trails, general), subsection (3); the signs will have high tonal
contrast with its background in order to assist with visual recognition; and include
characters that use a sans serif font.
A.4.4.5 Planting
A substantial vegetated buffer will be ensured between the Macleod Estate Trail
Linkage and the surrounding Macleod’s Landing neighbourhood. This will be provided
through existing vegetation where possible, and through the creation of additional
planted buffer area where needed. Visual screening and dissuading trail users from
entering the planted area are priorities for the design of this planted buffer.
To help prevent trail users from attempting to access Philips Lake, the vegetated buffer
in between the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage and Philips Lake may be enhanced. This
will necessitate strategic additional plantings within the existing vegetated area. Visual
screening and preventing trail users from entering the planted area are priorities for the
design of this planted buffer.
Planted buffers should be generally consistent with the intent of the Oak Ridges
Corridor Park Management Plan Section 5.4.4. A detailed planting plan to achieve these
buffers should be developed as part of the detailed design of the Macleod Estate Trail
Linkage.
A.4.4.6 Fencing
Additional fencing may be implemented between the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage and
the surrounding Macleod’s Landing neighbourhood and/or between the Macleod Estate
Trail Linkage and Philips Lake. Any additional fencing should be substantial physical
barriers to prevent access by trail users, however the fencing should not detract from
the greenspace trail experience by creating a claustrophobic atmosphere or degrade
the natural look-and-feel of the trail.
The precise siting and design of any additional fencing will be determined as part of the
detailed design of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage. If chain-link fencing is incorporated
into the final trail design, the chain-link fencing will not extend into the ORCCR property
further than the connection point with the existing chain-link fence that encircles Philips
Lake.
38
A.4.5 Accessibility
In an effort for the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage to be accessible for a wide variety of
users, the new trail will fulfill the following accessibility requirements as set forth by the
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (2005) Regulation 191/11: Section 80.9
(Technical requirements for trails, general):
“80.9 (1) Obligated organizations shall ensure that any recreational trails that
they construct or redevelop, and that they intend to maintain, meet the following
technical requirements:
1. A recreational trail must have a minimum clear width of 1,000 mm.
2. A recreational trail must have a clear height that provides a minimum head
room clearance of 2,100 mm above the trail.
3. The surface of a recreational trail must be firm and stable.
4. Where a recreational trail has openings in its surface,
i. the openings must not allow passage of an object that has a diameter of
more than 20 mm, and
ii. any elongated openings must be orientated approximately
perpendicular to the direction of travel.
5. Where a recreational trail is constructed adjacent to water or a drop-off, the
trail must have edge protection that meets the following requirements:
i. The edge protection must constitute an elevated barrier that runs along
the edge of the recreational trail in order to prevent users of the trail from
slipping over the edge.
ii. The top of the edge protection must be at least 50 mm above the trail
surface.
iii. The edge protection must be designed so as not to impede the
drainage of the trail surface.
6. Despite paragraph 5, where there is a protective barrier that runs along the
edge of a recreational trail that is adjacent to water or a drop-off, edge protection
does not have to be provided.
7. The entrance to a recreational trail must provide a clear opening of between
850 mm and 1,000 mm, whether the entrance includes a gate, bollard or other
entrance design.
39
8. A recreational trail must have at each trail head signage that provides the
following information:
i. The length of the trail.
ii. The type of surface of which the trail is constructed.
iii. The average and the minimum trail width.
iv. The average and maximum running slope and cross slope.
v. The location of amenities, where provided. O. Reg. 413/12, s. 6.
(2) The signage referred to in paragraph 8 of subsection (1) must have text that,
(a) has high tonal contrast with its background in order to assist with visual
recognition; and
(b) includes characters that use a sans serif font. O. Reg. 413/12, s. 6.
(3) Where other media, such as park websites or brochures, are used by the
obligated organization to provide information about the recreational trail, beyond
advertising, notice or promotion, the media must provide the same information as
listed in paragraph 8 of subsection (1). O. Reg. 413/12, s. 6.”
The Macleod Estate Trail Linkage will also investigate opportunities to go beyond these
design requirements, as requested by the Town of Richmond Hill Accessibility Advisory
Committee. These exact scope, nature, and location of these elements will be
determined during the detailed design phase.
A.4.5.1 Slope Improvements
Trail slope characteristics are linked to enabling accessibility for a wide variety of users.
Typically trail longitudinal grades below 5% are considered to be accessible for the
widest variety of users. Trail longitudinal slopes between 5% and 8% and between 8%
and 10% can be incorporated into a trail that is accessible for a wide variety of users,
including persons with disabilities, if areas with slopes less than 5% are included at
appropriate intervals.
Based on the preliminary desktop longitudinal slope analysis of the conceptual Macleod
Estate Trail Linkage alignment, areas of the trail have been identified which are
anticipated to pose accessibility issues due to longitudinal slope. These areas can be
viewed on Figure A20, identified by the red circles5. These areas should be evaluated
5 These areas were identified based on a combination of longitudinal slope characteristics. If a section of
8%-10% longitudinal grade was present, the area was identified for slope mitigation or rest areas. If an
extended section of trail (approx. 30m) exhibited a consistent 5%-8% longitudinal grade, the area was
40
during the detailed design and construction of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage to
incorporate intervals with slopes less than 5%. These rest areas could be realized
through minor realignments of the trail to incorporate areas of grade lesser than 5% if
possible, or by regrading a small area of the trail to a longitudinal slope lesser than 5%.
The exact design and siting of these rest areas will be determined through the detailed
design process for the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage.
A.4.5.2 Paved Surface Area
The provision of a firm and stable surface area is necessary to enable accessibility for a
wide variety of users. While the limestone granular fines currently in use along the
existing ORCCR trail system can provide a surface area that achieves this accessibility,
pavement can also be an effective surface area to enabling accessibility. Pavement
may be an appropriate trail surface in more urbanized areas, while granular fine
material may be appropriate in more natural settings (MBTW Group, 2013).
Based on the input of the Town of Richmond Hill Accessibility Advisory Committee, the
possibility of installing a paved trail surface for the section of trail along the sliver maple
carriageway will be evaluated. This section of trail is within an urban area and the trail
longitudinal slope is minimal. The type and extent of any paved trail surface area along
the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage will be evaluated based on budgetary and
environmental impact considerations, and will be finalized during the detailed design
process.
A.4.6 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Management
The management, maintenance, and oversight of the section of the Macleod Estate
Trail Linkage within the ORCCR property will be undertaken by TRCA staff, as per the
Management Agreement between TRCA and the Province of Ontario.
The management, maintenance, and oversight of the sections of the Macleod Estate
Trail Linkage within private lands or within lands owned by the Town of Richmond Hill
will be negotiated between TRCA and individual landowners. If these activities are to be
undertaken by TRCA, a formalized maintenance or management agreement will be
necessary.
identified for slope mitigation or rest areas. This methodology generally follows the precedent of the
Accessibility Design Guidelines for York Regional Forest Trails (MBTW Group, 2013), as well as the input
of the Town of Richmond Hill Accessibility Advisory Committee.
41
Figure A20: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Proposed Trail Map (Conceptual Alignment)
Longitudinal Slope Issue Areas
42
A.5 Macleod Estate Trail Linkage Budget
Total implementation cost for the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage: $381,644.63 (+HST)
This cost is in 2018 dollars, and includes a contingency and administrative surcharge.
This cost does not include pavement as a surface treatment for the trail, and
incorporates a 3-rail post and paddle fencing option.
The implementation budget may be refined further through the detailed design process.
Macleod Estate Trail Linkage References:
MBTW Group. 2013. Accessibility Design Guidelines for York Regional Forest Trails.
Richmond Hill, Heritage Richmond Hill. September 13, 2016. Minutes – Heritage
Richmond Hill Meeting #05-16.
Technical Oak Ridges Corridor Park Management Plan (2006)
Addendum
The following list of changes describes the modifications to the Oak Ridges Corridor
Park (ORCP) Management Plan (2006) which will enable the realization and
formalization of the Macleod Estate Trail Linkage:
1. An additional section entitled ADDENDUMS will be added to the ORCP
Management Plan directly following the end of the end of section 11.0
REFERENCES.
2. Addendum A: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage shall be inserted into the ORCP
Management Plan within section ADDENDUMS
3. The ORCP Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS shall be updated to
reflect changes (1) and (2) above
4. The ORCP Management Plan LIST OF FIGURES shall be updated to
incorporate the Addendum A: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage List of Figures
5. The ORCP Management Plan LIST OF TABLES shall be updated to incorporate
the Addendum A: Macleod Estate Trail Linkage List of Tables
6. The Map entitled Figure 6.1 Trails Master Plan Update (2018) shall be inserted
into the ORCP Management Plan directly following Figure 6: Trails Master
Plan.
7. The Map entitled Figure 8.1: Recommended Signage Locations Update
(2018) shall be inserted into the ORCP Management Plan directly following
Figure 8: Recommended Signage Locations.
8. The ORCP Management Plan LIST OF FIGURES shall be updated to reflect
changes (6) and (7) above.
9. The ORCP Management Plan REFERENCES shall be updated to incorporate
Macleod Estate Trail Linkage References