Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-14_Minutes_PPG_EMC_2014-10-07PARTNERS IN 0 PROJECT GREEN A PEARSON ECO-BUSINESS ZONE Partners in Project Green - Executive Management Committee Meeting Meeting #2/14 Tuesday, October 7, 2014 from 7:45 to 9:30 a.m. Kortright Centre (Archetype House) 0 Pine Valley Drive, Maple, ON L4L 1A6 MEETING®BJECTIVESD 1. Confirm interim officers. 2. Approve previous minutes of meeting. 3. Receive for information PPG collective project funding allocations. 4. Present Performance Committee progress and discuss challenges. 5. Confirm Committee support towards the recruitment of top PPG targets. MEETING®GENDAIE LEAD PREREQUISITES [7:45 — 7:50] Call to Order B.Denney - Review of report (Item 1) - Welcome and special announcement 1) Confirmation of interim officers [7:50— 7:551 Minutes Interim Chair - Review minutes (Item 2) 2) Approve minutes of meeting #1/14 [7:55-8:00] Presentation and Round Table Interim Chair - Review funding allocations report 3) Receive for information collective project (Item 3) funding allocations [8:00 — 8:30] Presentation and Discussion Perf. Comm. & - Review summary reports (Item 4) 4) Present Performance Committee and Service Centre Service Centre progress and discuss Chairs challenges. [8:30-8:15] Round Table Interim Chair -Review email"Partners in Project -Review list of top PPG targets. Green - Executive Management Action A1114" sent 09/08/2014 (Item 5) Confirm Committee support towards the 5) recruitment of top PPG targets. 11 P a g e Meeting #2/14 [9:00-9:30] Tour & Presentation -Tour of Sustainable Archetype Houses -Presentation on BRE Innovation Park -Discuss learnings in context of PPG collective projects [9:30] Adjournment -Volunteer to host Dec. 10 meeting. Meeting Location Map: L. Bryden (BILD) - Peruse the following links G. MacMillan www.sustainablehouse.ca (TRCA) www.thelivingcitycampus.com/demon stration/bre-innovation-oark Interim Chair 79.5931448,16z/data=!4m2! 3m1! 1 sOx882b25b63 TEXT MEETING DECEMBER 10, 20144:00-5:30 P.M. LOCATION TBD 81,- a3b 2 1 'age Meeting #2/14 IMM &IPIPM@W&ra Item 1 TO: Members of the Partners in Project Green Executive Management Committee Meeting #2/14, October 7, 2014 FROM: Alex Dumesle — Manager, Eco -Business Programs RE: CONFIRMATION OF INTERIM EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OFFICERS KEYISSUE To confirm the interim Executive Management Committee Chair and Vice -Chair who will provide leadership in building a shared vision and community commitment for moving forward with a blueprint for action. RECOMMENDATION THAT the responsibilities of Chair for the Partners in Project Green Executive Management Committee be assumed by John Coyne until the end of the 2013- 2015 term. THAT the position of Vice -Chair for the Partners in Project Green Executive Management Committee remain vacant. BACKGROUND As per the new committee's terms of reference, voting members of the Executive Management Committee are normally required to have two committee officers: a Chair and a Vice -Chair. Partners in Project Green leadership is entrusted to individuals that will spark enthusiasm and ensure steady progression towards the realization of the Pearson Eco - Business Zone vision in this next chapter of the project's history. Due to recent restructuring at the GTAA, Toby Lennox was obliged to step down as Chair of Partners in Project Green's Executive Management Committee. The GTAA requires time to make internal adjustments, but is expected to resume its leadership role on the committee after a short transition period. Under such circumstances the terms of reference state that "in the absence of the Chair, the Vice -Chair will perform [Chair] functions" (2013-2015 Terms of Reference, Section 3.5). Report prepared by: For more information contact Date: Alex Dumesle, MBA, P.Eng. Alex Dumesle, adumesle@trca.on.ca 416-661-6600, extension 5316 September 29, 2014 Pagett GTAA PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN A PEARSON ECO -BUSINESS ZONE MINUTES OF THE PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE #1/14 April 3, 2014 G The Partners in Project Green Executive Management Committee met at Mississauga Living Arts Centre located at 4141 Living Arts Drive, Scotia McLeod Board Room, Mississauga, ON L5134138 on April 3, 2014. Tobv Lennox called the meetina to order at 3:30 D.m ;2:7*114:Y1 Sean Brady Advisory Member Mike Brandt Voting Member Michelle Brown Alternate John Coyne Vice -Chair Brian Denney Voting Member Chris Despins Alternate Chris Fonseca Voting Member Neil Lacheur Voting Member Toby Lennox Chair Philip Ling Alternate Trevor Lui Voting Member Learie Miller Advisory Member STAFF Cindy Barr TRCA Alex Dumesle TRCA Adele Freeman TRCA Randy McGill GTAA Chandra Sharma TRCA REGRETS Shelley Carroll Brad Chittick Bonnie Crombie Jonathan Davies John Kinkead John Sanderson Voting Member Voting Member Voting Member Voting Member Voting Member Voting Member Page 11 Item 2 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE I MEETING MINUTES ACTION SUMMARY NUMBER TOPICACTION DESCRIPTION OWNER ECD STATUS #PPG A14 /13 Membership Recruit or facilitate the recruitment of prospective PPG All 01 -Mar -14 ONGOING members, ambassadors, and eco -solution providers. #PPG Al /14 Membership Provide Committee members with a list of membership Alex Dumesle 05 -May -14 ONGOING prospects which PPG would like help reaching out to. #PPG A2 /14 Strategy Detrmine pilot project funding allocation criteria and Alex Dumesle OS -May -14 ONGOING process. RESOLUTION SUMMARY `See Supporting Materials below for more information. SUPPORTING MATERIALS RES. #PPG1/14 MINUTES OF MEETING To approve the previous meeting minutes. THAT the Minutes of Meeting #4/13, held on December 11, 2013, be approved. Item for Information A Guide to Eco -Business Zane Planning & Development A GUIDE TO ECO -BUSINESS ZONE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Partners in Project Green has played an instrumental role in the development of A Guide to Eco -Business Zone Planning & Development, which was approved by the Town of Caledon Council on Tuesday April 1st, 2014 (Council Resolution 2014-127 R131) Integrated in the Town's planning process, the Guide will provide a blueprint on the planning, design and subsequent development of eco -business zones in current and future employment lands throughout the Town of Caledon. Although specifically designed for the Town of Caledon, the Guide may also be used by other municipalities wishing to extract the social, environmental and economic benefits associated with eco -business type developments. Page 12 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE I MEETING MINUTES Table 1 — Typical Eco -Business Zone Social, Environmental and Economic Benefits ✓Attract progressive ✓Better integration of ✓Meaningful environmental development industrial lands into impact -'More resilient employment areas ✓Infrastructure and operational savings Town fabric ✓Enhance the culture of conservation ✓Building a collaborative business community ✓Demonstrate environmental leadership ✓Resiliency to climate change Moving Forward Moving forward, Partners in Project Green will make the document available to the public, and actively seek opportunities to promote the Town of Caledon's leadership. Marketing opportunity examples: • Municipal Environmental Advisory Committees • The Ontario Environment and Cleantech Business and Policy Forum (April 23) • FCM conference and tradeshow (May 30 — June 2) • CAGBC Conference (June 2 — June 4) • OPPI Excellence in Planning Awards Item for Information PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN MARKETING PLAN Receive for information Partners in Project Green Marketing Plan. 2014 - 2015 Objectives "To be an internationally recognized community known for its competitive, high performance and eco -friendly business climate." Target Market — Based on Top PPG User Profiles Looking at the list of top PPG users, i.e., most active with greatest spend, the team identified three prominent users: 1) Bottom Liners; 2) On Board; 3) Leaders Strategy to create strong brand awareness by: 1. .e for a louder and clearer voice 2. Leveraging partner networks and brands 3. Leveraging events to drive value and engagement Page 1 3 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE i MEETING MINUTES Major Milestones ` j 3 c m o f e m � Mar. Jun. Apr. 2014 2014 2015 eF �c i 0//4 V. �r w Sept i • • Monitoring Success Metrics • # active members • # members and non-members attending events/programs • Google analytics Frequency — quarterly (review process every Engagement Committee meeting) Page 14 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE I MEETING MINUTES It was suggested that a list of prospects be provided by staff to enable members of the Executive Management Committee to reach out to potential new members It was suggested that the website be moved to the top of the actions list. Alex Dumesle pointed out that timing limitations included limited staff resources and that an external firm would be performing some of the work. Item for Input DISCUSS PPG 2013 YEAR-END FINANCIALS AND 2014 BUDGET Receive 2013 year-to-date budget and 2014 revenue allocation for input. Partners in Project Green Statement of Financial Activities Budget Actual Variance Year ended December 31, 2014 (YEAR-TO-DATE) 2014 2014 2014 REVENUES Self -Generated $ 280,000.00 wsw $ - o.ow $ (280,000.00) Municipal $ 445,000.00 279% $ - aow $ (445,000.00) Provincial $ 25,000.00 1.6% $ - 00% $ (25,000.00) Federal $ 93,335.00* 59w $ - o.ow $ (93,335.00) Business $ 325,000.00 20.4% $ - o.ow $ (325,000.00) * Prior year Revenue for Future Projects $ 426,251.48 267%'$ 426,251.48 ioo.ow $ - TOTAL $ 1,594,586.48 $ 426,251A8 $(1,168,335.00) EXPENDITURES Stakeholder Engagement Programming $ 328,100.00 69wr$ 49,309.93 saw $ (278,790.07) Energy Performance Programming $ 125,600.00 $ 28,825.46 $ (96,774.54) Waste Management Programming $ 155,600.00 $ 22,353.39 $ (133,246.61) Water Stewardship Programming $ 134,900.00 $ 18,129.92 $ (116,770.08) Special Projects $ 27,500.00 $ 4,276.04 $ (23,223.96) Service Gentres $ 80,000.00 $ - $ (80,000.00) Program Marketing & Business Development $ 185,000.00 15w'$ 11,030.02 6w $ (173,969.98) Program Administration $ 196,100.00 16w'$ 48,032.84 26w $ (148,067.16) * Deferred Expenditures for Future Projects $ 201,786.48 $ 244,293.88 $ 42,507.40 TOTAL $ 1,434,586.48 $ 426,251.48 $(1,008,335.00) CHANGE IN NET ASSETS $ 160,000.00 $ - $ (160,000.00) NET ASSETS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR $ 160,000.00 $ 160,000.00 NET ASSETS AT YEAR END $ 160,000.00 $ 160,000.00 $ - Figure 1 - 2014 Statement of Financial Activities (as of Apr. 1, 2014) The proposed 2014 budget was well received by Committee members. Recognizing that $160,000 would be available to support the implementation of Performance Committee pilot projects, it was agreed that these resources should be concentrated on the projects with the greatest potential value for Partners in Project Green as a whole. To this end, the Committee tasked staff to develop the criteria and process required for pilot project fund allocation [#PPG A2/141. Page 15 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE i MEETING MINUTES TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 5:25 p.m., on April 3, 2014. Toby Lennox John Coyne Chair Vice -Chair Next meeting Thursday, June 26, 2014 MONTECO 2 St. Clair Ave. West #2100 Toronto, ON M4V 1 L5 Canada Page 1 6 FOR INFORMATION Item 3 TO: Members of the Partners in Project Green Executive Management Committee Meeting #2/14, October 7, 2014 FROM: Alex Dumesle — Manager, Eco -Business Programs RE: PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN 2014 COLLECTIVE PROJECT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS KEYISSUE Allocate the $160,000 funds available to enhance the most promising 2014 Partners in Project Green collective project(s). RECOMMENDATION THAT the following three (3) proposed collective projects and funding allocations be received for information: 1. Electric Vehicle Network: $80,000 2. On -Site Organics Diversion: $30,000 3. Stormwater Management Showcase: $50,000 BACKGROUND Following meeting #1/14, an extraordinary Executive Management Committee meeting with Performance Committee Chairs was held via conference call on July 28th, 2014 in lieu of the planned June meeting, which was cancelled due to schedule conflicts. The purpose of the meeting was to allocate the $160,000 set aside for the execution of large collective projects mandated by the Committee to exemplify the power of multi -stakeholder collaboration while creating significant publicity for the Partners in Project Green program. Those attending the extraordinary meeting included: PRESENT Mike Brandt Voting Member Shelley Carroll Voting Member Brad Chittick Voting Member Brian Denney Voting Member Chris Fonseca Voting Member STAFF Alex Dumesle TRCA Adele Freeman TRCA Chandra Sharma TRCA REGRETS Michelle Brown Alternate John Coyne Vice Chair Bonnie Crombie Voting Member Page I 1 Trevor Lui Voting Member John Sanderson Voting Member Project Summaries Three projects and funding requests pertaining to Energy Performance, Waste Management, and Water Stewardship were presented (see attached for more detail). ,.�, tUl(R 4Xppa Energy Performance Committee Collective Project —'— Project Summary Electric Vehicle Network Pilot ProjectVision lay NefaedaWforal EV We zfutwl reduce GflG taassion5 aaapCOtlhaitlr trauportaum at ft tme Oblecove Wo*.iN ure Grear To=WAma toi u]154100chwgrg snti by Neem of 2014 1) DlVtlnpa vOale-aoonsi". ad open network of on pv stations spa!arl• rmfMia soft,amappicaCma A Outcomes Ometnea0opcon o/elecfnc vYYGes 3) Gmeoate a ttadc reod0 of suoo IW rase atWam am vWu resouroea 4) Obtae me data ad Nuate W GHG emssions avodan A COMM w90esprea0 rewgmxxf focal project sukehatl 0I Ni lli 1. Figure 1 -Energy Performance Collective Project jt „' t" , arrWaste Management Committee Collective Project -- Project Overview N • Organics Diversion Vision Asaass the "YtrortltaparfIXTinCe and UM bGSt s of Yams otclavkeias W Oearaiw whetMr on -lift syir a u a viaNa WW for opaa waate avas+wr Objective Depbymenta!Soo-Srteoryanros w»re prxess+q sysrems,am exeoi,non. o!lab testing tpexamne water inpieatien. 11 Demrmire A ansnesystrmsam a vuble option faorgaros dve,sm n umasbrd "M inpipaooas am Otte a,e opport Y for ware. orv"r Outcomes 3) sept inpactorrviimanGtonnes was[etiversgn pr. we. 4) Develop iba V"Aedge am mlawaships to Nuuch m w organics program nut iwru tra•onal am orate arganres Oivecsion solutions W Ne Pearson Em Ga Szore Cl 10" I ;I I Figure 2 - Waste Management Collective Project Page 12 Water Stewardship Committee Collective Project -- Project Summary �oI Water Footprint Collective Projects Vision Sufpen sustarabW caPoraWS tocused Da rater sfenrtlshy. &M* eabbo a ve mieetsgearetl tereauee rata fcovwxx atnegthatst wmaaager•e,1 ProvNI COIIaMlieve suPPM aM dlvfa9paa iPiroVld VlydYl4taMk t013' "- objective 'epiYtatlbanPkmenlEW co atflmM'dlNrNaaglra2nt leCF.MIS, tl5 tl NvE i Vfttto Watw SterwdOp wav faOW trcd.c metnc5 2) amaig at vy reoogrti[ion rotAlahIXa4ve sustw volect modll4 3) Sh2wc&Ntg i=vauvetfahrstewwCshq teehrw gp and sYsterss Outcomes i) l(plsan CoNs:3/./ggspwre/eetol storrtxraia ma.�age�mr�t infrastry::.'s Alex D. MWW-OPMI& ltdy 2.9r AM LPf rDm WFirv¢Dt¢d w irIir t, $) CWarone: 12.000 sqY fm of S1p11 wTardgea' ambo$[ IL e'_. process appovnatW 3.210 mL of rWirata har"W w nfit WeMaife Figure 3 - Water Stewardship Collective Project PROCESS 0 1 A list of decision criteria was formulated to help facilitate the decision process for the Executive Management Committee. The meeting agenda is captured in Table 1. Table 1- July 28, 2014 Agenda TIME ACTIVITY PREREQUISITES F 1200 12:10 Setting the context -Agree on objective and -Review suggested decision Alex D. process criteria 1210 1240 Project proposals -Common understanding of - Review 3pmjec[pmposals Michelle B. proposed project strengths & Mike B. limitations Brad C. 12:40 1:30 Discussions &deliberation -Consensus on pmjectfund Alex D. allocation Note that in the absence of both Waste Management Committee Chairs, Michelle Brown delegated her presentation to Alex Dumesle. During this meeting Committee chairs presented both the merits and limitations of their respective project. The criteria addressed included: 1. Collaboration factor — Potentialformultiple-stakeholderinvolvement 2. Environmental Impact—Potential magnitude of environmental benefits 3. Innovativeness —innovation in design, technology, business model, approach, etc. 4. Marketing Value — Potential story, hot topic, appeal, stakeholders, project size S. Scalability — Potential to scale up and replicate for the development of future programs or adoption by other stakeholders Page 13 PROJECT COMPARISON When evaluating project proposals and comparing them to the agreed decision criteria, attendees determined all projects to be very valuable and aligned with Partners in Project Green's mandate. Table 2 summarizes the strengths and limitations identified. Table 2 - Project Evaluation Grid Collaboration Factor + Private and public participants + Involves NGOs, Manufacturers, Installers, Car Rental companies Environmental Impact - Direct impact of first 20 stations is limited Innovativeness +Open network technology not widely adopted - EV technology is not new Marketing Value + Hot topic in public realm Scalability + Potential for full scale program + Valuable data collection for larger scale project - Limited time for participant recruitment - Scale requires incremental funding + Multi -stakeholder collaboration - Limited number of sites +5.8 Million liters + Engagement component - Limited number of sites - Direct impact from pilot sites is limited + Water implications not yet studied - Permeable pavement - Organic waste is not new solutions are not new +Timing (frequent storms and flooding) + Impacts water quality (#1 water -related issue for Canadians) + Pilot representative of typical business in the zone +One project planned as multi -phase + Issue that resonates with the public + 30% of waste generated in ON from organic matter + Project suitable for all business types and sizes - Limited time for participant recruitment Page 14 OUTCOME Recognizing the benefits of all three proposed projects, and appreciating the given budgeting constraints, the Energy Performance Committee agreed to modify their funding request from $100,000 to $80,000. Thus a consensus was reached to support all three proposed projects with the following funding allocations, as laid out in Figure 4. Agreed Funding Request = $160K $50,000.00 ■ EV Network ■ Organics ■ Water Footprint Figure 4- Funding Allocations for Partners in Project Green Collective Projects Report prepared by: Alex Dumesle For more information contact: Alex Dumesle adumesle@trca.on.ca. 416-661-6600, extension 5316 Attachments: EMC Funding Requests.pdf Date: September 29, 2014 Page 15 1 PARTNERSIN PROJECT GREEN ,. vFPRWN f W-RYSIXE55 f°X[ C Trevor Lui International Centre v -C Bonnie Crombie Region of Peel • Jeremiah Bremner Loyalty One • Jeff Baines City of Brampton • Susan Amring City of Mississauga • John Alderdice City of Toronto • Valerie Adriaanse Bullfrog Power Dedicated Staff %FTE • Jennifer Taves 90% • Nadia Mohammed 90% • Alex Dumesle 20% • Alexandra Papaiconomou 75% • Alyssa Cerbu 20°% • Mark O'Connor Kuehne+Nagel • Randy McGill GTAA Relevant Experience/Training Marketing Facilitation, Sales & CSM Training MBA Sales Training MBA Facilitation&Sales Training Facilitation & Sales Training Facilitation & Sales Training 10/6/2014 Status 2015 Target Environmental GHG Reduction (Tonnes CO2e) N/A N/A Materials Avoided (Tonnes) N/A N/A Water Footprint Reduction (litres) N/A N/A Engagement Number of Active Members (ff) 0 76 200 Financial Self -Generated Revenue: Total Budget TRD:$327,500 $137,500:$327,500 c y 'm � v c c Status III w c 2 m ` `o M c c W W IY c Programs Participants • People Power Challenge (2014) Implementation 15 Companies 16 Teams 13,775 Employees Dedicated Events Attendees • Spring Networking Event (Apr. 3 2014) Complete 156 • Earth Day Planting (Apr. 26 2014) Complete 117 0 • Webinar: Flood Mitigation (May 6 2014) Complete 43 Q • SSL: EV Business Case (May 22 2014) Complete 35 Q D • Bus Tour: Energy (lune 27 2014) Complete 26 Q • Duke Out! (September 25 2014) In Progress 176 D Collective Projects • People Power Challenge (2014) Implementation 15 Q ® Q PARTNERSIN PROJECT GREEN I, vFPRWX f W-BYSIXE55 SORE Challenges and/or Good News • Spring Networking Event featuring Amanda Lang was extremely well received, with 156 attendees & extremely positive feedback • People Power Challenge: Ended Sept. 29 with 15 teams (16 facilities) and 13,775 employees • Sustainability Duke Out featuring James Cunnignham was a huge success, with 176 attendees (198 with staff). • Successful 6 -month social media campaign, with 1,200 followers (500% growth) • Clifton Coppolino replacing Jennifer Taves during maternity leave. 10/6/2014 PARTNERSIN PROJECT GREEN C Brad Chittick v -c Shelley Carroll • Paul Callegari • Andrew Gustyn • David Wawrychuk • Scott Hendershot • Philip Ling Dedicated Staff %FTE • Adam Vaiya 90% • Alex Dumesle 20% • Nathaniel Maeder 90% Environmental Engagement Financial 10/6/2014 0 Canadian Tire Corp. • Jim Baxter City of Toronto City of Toronto • Brenda Osborne City of Mississauga GWL Realty Advisors • Sam Ramtahal Enersource Unisource • Peter Goldman Enbridge Gas Distribution Orlando Corporation • Sean Brady Ontario Power Authority Pratt & Whitney Canada m Powersmiths International GHG Reduction (Tonnes COze) Number of Active Members (#) Self -Generated Revenue : Total Relevant Experience/Training Facilitation LEED AP BD+C C.E.T. E.M.I.T. Facilitation MBA, B.Eng., Mechanical Hvdro One Bramoton Training Status 3,043 76 $26,600:$133,700 2015 Target 5,000 N/A $90,000: $133,700 • Energy Leaders Consortium Members exceeded collective energy savings target by 21%, implementing projects expected conserve 18,793 eMWh, save $1.47M in utility costs, and avoid 2,590 t eCOz of emissions annually. • 81 Electricity Assessment Reports generated for Hydro One Brampton customers (39 in 2014), resulting in 4.53 GWh savings from approved incentive applications - 2014 Value: $19,500 8 Thermal Efficiency Assessments performed on Enbridge's small to medium sized industrial and commercial and industrial facilities: Value: $4,000 2 Level II audits completed on Medallion Corporation MURES prescribing lighting retrofits and booster pump repacements - forecasted to result in $50k in annual savings with a 2.6 year simple payback. Value: $4,850 • Lange Transporation installs first two networked charging stations under the PPG Open EV Network • EV Network Participant Incentive approved by Executive Committee and grant agreement ready for distribution n Status C d v L d C C 4 m a W W C iz C Programs • Eco -Efficiency Assessment Reports 39 assessments + 3 453 tons CO,e avoided Q Q Q audits complete • Energy Leaders Consortium 7 participants, 5 2,590 tons c02e avoided Q Q Q Q meetings 18,793 eMWh savings Dedicated Events Attendees • SSL -Can EVsworkforyou?(JUn10) Completed 35 Q Q Q Q • Sustainability Bus Tour (Jun 27) Completed 26 Q Q Q • Webinar- Building Certs. (Oct 14) Pending 40 Registered Q ® Q Collective Projects • Electric Vehicle Network -Pilot 3 stations installed; 0 tons COze reduced Q ® ® Q 54-76 stations anticipated by Spring 2015 • Energy Leaders Consortium Members exceeded collective energy savings target by 21%, implementing projects expected conserve 18,793 eMWh, save $1.47M in utility costs, and avoid 2,590 t eCOz of emissions annually. • 81 Electricity Assessment Reports generated for Hydro One Brampton customers (39 in 2014), resulting in 4.53 GWh savings from approved incentive applications - 2014 Value: $19,500 8 Thermal Efficiency Assessments performed on Enbridge's small to medium sized industrial and commercial and industrial facilities: Value: $4,000 2 Level II audits completed on Medallion Corporation MURES prescribing lighting retrofits and booster pump repacements - forecasted to result in $50k in annual savings with a 2.6 year simple payback. Value: $4,850 • Lange Transporation installs first two networked charging stations under the PPG Open EV Network • EV Network Participant Incentive approved by Executive Committee and grant agreement ready for distribution PARTNERSIN PROJECT GREEN C Michelle Brown V -C John Sanderson • Wendy Loiselle • Penny Thompson • Randy McGill • Tina Dufresne • Dwayne Chiasson • Norman Lee Bentall Kennedy City of Brampton Woodbine Entertainment Air Canada Greater Toronto Airport Authority Ministry of Environment City of Brampton Region of Peel Industry Experts • Jo -Anne St. Godard RCO Dedicated Staff %FTE Relevant Experience/Training • Malaz Sebai 90% Facilitation MBA Waste Auditor Certification • Alex Dumesle 10% Facilitation MBA • Jaime Carnevale 100% Sales Status 2015 Tar Environmental Materials Avoided (Tonnes) PPG 45.7 500 Materials Exchanged (Tonnes) PPG 144.1 — Materials Avoided (Tonnes) PEBZ N/A 1500 Financial Total Status n • Material Exchange Program 120 participants 8 active company facilitations 12 exchanges to date Dedicated Events Attendees • SSL -Engagement on Waste (Feb. 2014) Complete 64 `1 • Webinar & Audit Video (Nov 2014) Development Phase Collective Projects • Organics Diversion Operation Phase: Recruitment Phase Site 1 Complete 3 sites outstanding Challenges and/or Good News • June 27 – DSC Labs recycled 254kgs of plastics packaging and products that failed to meet their product quality standards for their imaging businesses through Green Solution Industries. • July 4 – Ciba Vision is undergoing a plant closure and donated a variety of medical supplies netting 380kgs to Canadian Relief for Syria to support a hospital on the Syrian -Turkish border. • July 2014 –Although currently recycling rigid plastics, Goodwill connected with Greenspace Waste to switch recycling solutions. The program requires less source separation and resulted in additional revenues. This is an on- going program with approx. weight of 100 tonnes per year. • July 4,2014 - Bentall Kennedy, Sawmill Sid, and Weston Forest Products got together to demonstrate that infected ash trees can be converted into useable lumber. Sawmill Sid milled 16 trees from Bentall kennedy on-site to produce 2,462kgs of lumber to be distributed into the marketplace by Weston Forest Products. • Good news - Organics pilot project launched with testing at Woodbine • Challenge - Efforts underway to produce waste audit resources to support PPG community. Bosch to be pilot 10/6/2014 PARTNERSIN PROJECT GREEN 10/6/2014 l� C Mike Brandt Monteco, ONEIA • Lincoln Kan City of Mississauga V -C Chris Fonseca City of Mississauga • John Kinkead CVC • Reagan Davidson Imbrium • John Coyne Unilever • Adele Freeman TRCA • Jamie MacKinnon Molson-Coors • Andrew Farr Region of Peel • Francis Fung Toronto Water • Kerry Freek Water TAP • Michele Grenier XCG Dedicated Staff %FTE Relevant Experience/Training • Eric Nleliton 90°% BSc. Chemistry & Enviro. Science Strategic Consulting • Alyssa Cerbu 80°% MSc. Water Resource management Facilitation/Sales • Alex Dumesle 20% BEng. Mechanical Facilitation/Sales Status 2015 Target Environmental GHG Reduction (Tonnes. CO2e) N/A N/A Materials Avoided (Tonnes) N/A N/A Water Footprint Reduction (litres) Developed 172.4 M Engagement Number of Active Members (#) N/A N/A Financial Self -Generated Revenue : Total Budget TBD TBD Status c y C � a ry c m O u C W G W LL Programs • Collective Infrastructure Projects In Progress • Innovative Technology Showcase Developmental • Water Leaders Consortium Concept Phase • Public -Private -Partnerships Concept Phase ® f3 • Eco -Efficiency & Water Auditing Developmental Dedicated Events • SSL - Topic (Water Reuse - Oct 2014) In Progress Target 30-50 registrants Collective Projects • Sky Tap (Rainwater Harvesting) In Progress Calstone Inc. I® • Greening the Way (Filter Swale) Completed Brampton County Court • Greening the Way (Perm. Pavement) In Progress Molson-Coors • 4 Billion Litre (Green Roof) Developmental Molson-Coors • Greening the Way (Perm. Pavement) Developmental RBC PARTNERSIN - PROJECT GREEN 'hallenges and/or Good News 10/6/2014 Set 2015 Water Offsets target of 172.4 M L or-1.0%of baseline consumption volume in the Pearson Eco -Business Zone. Baseline 2012 consumption data (provided by Region of Peel and City of Toronto) combined with 2014 initiatives (e.g. Energy Leaders Consortium and collective water project results) used to derive estimated 2015 target. 2014 collective infrastructure projects (Ongoing). 1. Calstone Inc. (3.2 M L water harvested/infiltrated; $125,000 project value, $25,000 capital fund from PPG) rainwater harvesting and infiltration project (Update: Construction has begun in October 2014). 2. Molson-Coors Phase 1 (0.6 M L water infiltrated, $75,000 project value, $25,000 capital fund from PPG) permeable pavement project (Update: Engineering assessment has begun in October 2014). 3. Brampton County Court / City of Brampton / TD Bank (1.4 M L water treated/infiltrated, $175,000 project value) filter swale project (Update: Construction completed in September 2014). 2015 collective infrastructure project development (Ongoing). 1. RBC/Bentall Kennedy (TBD water infiltration, estimated $200,000 project value) permeable pavement and rainwater harvesting project (Update: Identification of key project components to be developed by Winter 2014). 2. Molson-Coors Phase II (2.0 M L water harvested, estimated $200,000 project value, request for $100,000 capital fund from PPG) green roof and rainwater harvesting project (Update: Engineering assessment to begin Winter 2014). Pre -qualification list of technology providers, engineers and contractors (Ongoingl. Working to create a pre - qualification Request for Proposal to be circulated amongst reputable firms to gauge interest in supporting 2015 collective infrastructure projects that will be replicated in the Eco -Business Zone. Seeking in-kind contributions, at- cost/collective buyer discounts, and full-scale support from vendors/suppliers identified (Update: RFP distributed in October 2014). 2014 Social Media Awareness Campaign. Ask the Expert video interviews produced (WWF Canada, WaterTAP, and Water Canada) to bring awareness to the 2015 Water Stewardship programs. Created a collaborative launch date for 2015 Water Stewardship programs with a channel partner (WaterTAP). (Update: Videos provided in September/October 2014; Launch date November 2014). Water Reuse Sustainability Skills Lab event. Focused on general manufacturing sectors that need assistance with proces water and wastewater reuse opportunities. Event will focus on challenges faced by industrial end users, roadblocks to implementation, and overall benefits. Attendance target is 30-50 industrial end users, 3-5 industry panelists, and 2-4 technology sponsors. (Update: Event scheduled in October 2014). Joint initiative with TRCA Ontario Climate Change Consortium team and Coca-Cola to retrofit 500+ rain barrels per year. Barrels will be donated to various local NGO groups for revenue generation. Coca-Cola is tasking OCC team and Pa in Project Green's Water Stewardship team to develop a feasibility model that would enlist the use of these barrels an annual basis (Update: Proposal provided in October 2014). Development of 18+2015 prospective collective project sites (Ongoing). Focused on identifying ambassadors/members/prospective members in the Eco -Business Zone and those recommended by CVC and STEP. Creating an evaluation criteria that will be used to select sites to pursue (Target: Selection of Prospective Sites by Winter 2014). GiPP PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN F PEAFCDN ECO BUSINESS ZONC Service Centre Committee Report — Oct 7, 2014 Development and implementation of new Partners in Project Green self-sustaining service centre programs to promote innovation, sustainability, and generate funds that can be re -invested into PPG's non-profit programming. 1. Program Alignment (TRCA & PPG) 2. Sustainable Impact (Social, Environment, Economic) 3. Market innovation ( development or diffusion ) 4. Profit Potential 5. Value to members (serve existing members & attract new ones) 6. International Recognition 1) Open innovation Accelerator PPG will support groups of businesses with sustainability challenges by sourcing problem solvers worldwide through an online community to develop new innovative solutions. Businesses will pay problems solvers for solutions and compensate PPG for framing the challenge, sourcing problem solvers, evaluating the solutions, and managing the award process. 2) Innovation Showcase PPG will diffuse innovation by facilitating pilot projects between early adopter businesses and solution providers with existing and semi -proven innovative solutions. Solution providers compensate PPG to evaluate their solutions and help place them in businesses. Businesses benefit by accessing innovative solutions on trial, at low cost low commitment. 1. Hold a consultation workshop to solicit engagement and input from stakeholders by end of month. 2. Implement a 3 month feasibility study to determine the viability of opportunity, starting November. 3. Develop a business plan to execute the service centre over spring 2015. 4. Launch service centre by summer or fall 2015. GTAA PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN A PEARSON EEO-RUSMESS ZONE Aug 1— After much consideration and consultation with PPG staff, TRCA staff, and the Service Centre committee, opportunities have been narrowed down to 2. Aug 12 — PPG and TRCA engaged services of The Next Practice to lead consultative workshops, facilitating the process of receiving input from stakeholders Sept 11— PPG held a consultation session with 10 stakeholders from a variety of TRCA groups, facilitated The Next Practice Sept 22 — The Service Centre Committee held its second meeting of the year to consult with PPG on progress and provide input on opportunities under exploration. Current— Efforts underway to recruit a 3rd party consulting firm for performing a feasibility study. Oct 30/Nov 6 — A workshop run by The Next Practice, where a variety of stakeholders will engage in simulated scenarios currently faced by the business community. Expected outcomes: Identify potential challenges to overcome and resources to leverage Help focus the opportunity to be explored in the feasibility study Executive Committee Support: Participate in the workshop to provide senior level leadership, input, and guidance from the business and municipal sectors. PARTNERS M PROJECT, GREEN Item 5 PPG TARGET LIST Company Name Industry Group Contact Name Title city Phone Number E�Mail Address Notes 3M Canada Tedmedogy Mississauga Aecon Group Inc. Professional Services Toronto Air Transat Airline: Mississauga Toronto Pearson Community_ BASF Canada Inc. Chemical- W9, Mississauga Bayer Inc Pharmaceutical Toronto Past PPG Participant BCE (Bell Canada)_Telecom Missasau a Black & McDonald Construction Toronto Pearson Community Bombardier Aerospace Mf Toronto Chrysler Automotive -Mfg Joshua Orenflicher Environmental Specialist Brampton Current PPG Participant (not a member) Greening Corp. Grounds Materials Exchange CIBC Financial CN Railway Company Logistics Brampton DB Schenker 1-09istics Mississau a Dell Consumer Electronics DuRerin Construction Construction Misaissau a Toronto Pearson Community Current PPG Participant (not a member) Networking Sponsor,Eco-Effigency Sponsor Past PPG Participant Current PPG Participant (not a member) Governance committee _ Enbddge Gas gglKy Peter Goldman Manager Indusidal Energy_Solubors Toronto FedEx 1-291stics Mississauga GE Technology Jonathan Davies Kir Warburton Goverment Markets VP Communications/Public Affairs Mississauga GSK Pharmaceutical Mississauga GWL Realty Property Management Paul Callegari Director Property Management Current PPG Participant (not a member) Governance Committee Heinz Canada Food &Beverage HeWet Packard Hilton Garden Inn Hitachi Canada HMSHost(Autogrill S.p.A.) Hydro One Brampton IT Frances Edmonds Director Environmental Programs Director, Sal" & Marketin Mississauga Hospitality Technology Food & Beverage Maggie Martina Mississau a Director Mississauga Brampton _ Toronto Pearson Community Cunent PPG Participant (not a member) Eco-EfiGenc Sponsor UGI' Ralph Williams IBM R IKEA Retail - Furniture CONFIDENTIAL- PARTNERS M PROJECT, GREEN Item 5 PPG TARGET LIST Company Name Industry Group Contact Name Title City Phone Number E�Mail Address Notes KLM Cargo Logistics Mississauga KPMG Financial Lassonde Beverages Canada Food & Beverage Toronto Past PPG Participant Lush Fresh Handmade Cosmetics Cosmetics Mapleleaf Foods Food & Beverage Anna Teenier Mississauga Past PPG Participant Menkes Microsoft Canada Property Management _ IT Current PPG Participant (not a member) People Power Challenge Mississauga Nestle Canada Food & Beverage Property Management Food & Beverage Consumer Goods John Challinor Corporate al sins Current PPG Participant (not a member) Mfg Consortium Oxford Properties Pepsi Cc Toronto Mississauga Procter & Gamble RBC Financial Services Randy Hansuid Accoum� Public Sector Mississmiga Past PPG Participant Rogers Telecom So .Inc. Food &Studies•RedsI Mississau Staples Advantage Suply, Chain Management Wholesale -1328 Logistics Susan DSoum Vanessa D'Alessandr Sr.National Mgr_Ouality&SusMinablltly Mississauga Target Canada Retail Kim Rapagna Director Sustamalbility Mississauga Talus Telecom The H..hy Company Food & Bevera a Past PPG Participant Tm Horton Consumer Services Oakville TJX Toronto Hydro Retail Mississauga WI' Toshiba _Technology Markham TRANE/Ingersoll Rand/Ingersoll Rand Foundation Equipment - Mfg & Clair Toronto Trillium Medical Sen,cea Mike Brunner Current PPG Participant (not a member) Materials Exchange People Power Challenge UPS Logistics Mississau a Walmart Retail Mississauga Mississauga Toronto Pearson Community Westet Airline. Steve Rice Weston Foods Food & Staples Retail lWalter Krauss ISr. Director, Environmental Affairs Toronto. I I IPast PPG Participant CONFIDENTIAL- C @[F aPPT@Wd GTAA 00 PARTNERS !N PROJECT GREEN A PEARSON ECO -BUSINESS ZONE MINUTES OF THE PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE #2/14 October 7, 2014 0 The Partners in Project Green Executive Management Committee met at Kortright Centre (Archetype House) 9550 Pine Valley Drive, Maple, ON 1-41- 1A6 John Coyne called the meeting to order at 7:46 a.m. PRESENT Sean Brady Mike Brandt Michelle Brown Brad Chittick John Coyne Brian Denney Neil Lacheur Trevor Lui Learie Miller STAFF Randy McGill Jennifer Dougherty Cindy Barr Alex Dumesle Glenn MacMillan Chandra Sharma Leigh St. Hilaire GUESTS Larry Brydon REGRETS Shelley Carroll Bonnie Crombie Jonathan Davies Chris Fonseca John Kinkead John Sanderson Advisory Member Voting Member Alternate Voting Member Interim Chair Voting Member Voting Member Voting Member Advisory Member GTAA CVC TRCA TRCA TRCA TRCA TRCA Ozz Electric & BILD Voting Member Voting Member Voting Member Voting Member Voting Member Voting Member Page 11 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE I MEETING MINUTES ACTION SUMMARY Meeting ACTION NUMBER TOPIC DESCRIPTION OWNER ECD STATUS STATUS 2/14 Recruit or facilitate the recruitment of prospective PPG CONFIRMATION OF ITERIM EXECUTIVE THAT the responsibilities of Chair for the Partners Neil Lacheur #PPG A14 /13 Membership All 01 -Mar -14 ONGOING members, ambassadors, and eco -solution providers. Committee be assumed by John Coyne until the Collective Develop marketing plan and begin promoting collective #PPG A3 /14 end of the 2013-2015 term. Alex Dumesle 27 -Oct -14 ONGOING Projectsproject launch. 72/14#PPG Identify 2-3 organizations that each committee member Project Green Executive Management Committee A4/14 Membership will contact at the sta rt of the 2015 Membership All 31 -Oct -14 ONGOING #PPG AS /14 Membership Develop Member segmented intro packages. Alex Dumesle 31 -Oct -14 ONGOING Trevor Lui Neil Lacheur Develop mechanism to create solution provider referral #PPG A6 /14 Administration Alex Dumesle 31 -Dec -14 ONGOING ist. RESOLUTION SUMMARY Meartling, RES. NUMBER TOPIC MOTION MOVED SECONDED STATUS 2/14 #PPG 2/14 CONFIRMATION OF ITERIM EXECUTIVE THAT the responsibilities of Chair for the Partners Neil Lacheur Trevor Lui CARRIED MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OFFICERS in Project Green Executive Management by Consensus Committee be assumed by John Coyne until the end of the 2013-2015 term. THAT the position of Vice -Chair for the Partners in Project Green Executive Management Committee remain ant. 2/14 #PPG 3/14 MINUTES OF MEETING THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/14, held on Apr. Trevor Lui Neil Lacheur CARRIED 3, 2034 be a roved. by Consensus `See Supporting Materials below for more information. SUPPORTING MATERIALS RES. #PPG2/14 CONFIRMATION OF INTERIM EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OFFICERS To confirm the interim Executive Management Committee Chair and Vice - Chair who will provide leadership in building a shared vision and community commitment for moving forward with a blueprint for action. THAT the responsibilities of Chair for the Partners in Project Green Executive Management Committee be assumed by John Coyne until the end of the 2013 - 2015 term. THAT the position of Vice -Chair for the Partners in Project Green Executive Management Committee remain vacant. CARRIED RES. #PPG3/14 MINUTES OF MEETING To approve the previous meeting minutes. THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/14, held on April 4, 2014, be approved. Ca_1:INI=107 Page 1 2 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE i MEETING MINUTES For Information PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN 2014 COLLECTIVE PROJECT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS Receive for information the following three (3) proposed collective projects and funding allocations: 1. Electric Vehicle Network: $80,000 2. On -Site Organics Diversion: $30,000 3. Stormwater Management Showcase: $50,000 On July 28t", 2014 an extraordinary Executive Management Committee meeting with Performance Committee Chairs was held via conference call to allocate the $160,000 set aside for the execution of large collective projects mandated by the Committee to exemplify the power of multi -stakeholder collaboration while creating significant publicity for the Partners in Project Green program. Three proposed collective projects were presented by Committee Chairs and delegates, and compared using the following criteria: 1. Collaboration factor — Potential for multiple -stakeholder involvement 2. Environmental Impact — Potential magnitude of environmental benefits 3. Innovativeness — innovation in design, technology, business model, approach, etc. 4. Marketing Value — Potential story, hot topic, appeal, stakeholders, project size 5. Scalability — Potential to scale up and replicate for the development of future programs or adoption by other stakeholders. Recognizing the benefits of all three proposed projects, and appreciating given budgeting constraints, meeting participants reached a consensus to support all three proposed projects with the following funding allocations, as laid out in Figure 1. Agreed Funding Request = $160K ■ EV Network 4D ■ Organics Ar Water Footprint Figure 1— Partners in Project Green Collective Project Funding Allocation The outcome of the extraordinary meeting was well received by members of the larger Executive Management Committee, who reiterated their support for the selected collective projects and requested that a marketing plan be developed to promote the various project launches [#PPG A3o"']. Page 13 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE I MEETING MINUTES For Information Performance Committee Updates Present Performance Committee progress and discuss challenges. Progress presented by Performance Committee and Service Centre Chairs was well received. See attached Item4_Performance_Committee_Report.pdf for more information. One of the challenges identified pertained to performance targets. More specifically what should be counted as part of Committee performance targets, and how this should be reported. The issue was not discussed, but could be tabled as a future agenda item. The Next Practice was hired to help TRCA accelerate progress and enhance its impact across the region. As such, The Next Practice consultants will run a workshop with Partners in Project Green stakeholders to further develop the proposed Service Centre business models and maximize their potential impact, as well as help staff gather valuable insights for the completion of the project's feasibility study. Executive Management Committee members will be invited to participate in the half day workshop on November 6, 2014. See attached PPG Flagship Proj - TNP7oct2014.pdf for more information regarding The Next Practice and their approach. For Discussion 2015 MEMBERSHIP CAMPAIGN Confirm Committee support towards the recruitment of top PPG targets. Recognizing the imminent 2015 membership campaign start (November 15`, 2014), and building on Partners in Project Green's second marketing strategy pillar (leveraging community champions), Executive Management Committee members agreed to help with the recruitment of prospective members. To this end, a list of target companies was produced by staff, and Executive Management Committee agreed to identify 2-3 organizations from this list and beyond that each committee member will contact at the start of the 2015 Membership campaign [*PPG A4/141. To support Committee members in this effort, staff were requested to develop member introduction packages that would have some degree of segmentation to cater different audiences PG A5/14]. In order to strengthen Partners in Project Green's membership base and create further value for the Pears Eco -Business Zone community, it was also recommended that staff develop a mechanism for the creation of a service and solution provider referral list ["PPG A60,']. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:06 a.m., on October 7, 2014. John Coyne Interim Chair Page 14 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE I MEETING MINUTES Special thanks to Larry Brydon, Glen MacMillan, and Leigh St. Hilaire for giving committee members a tour of the Archetype Sustainable Houses. www.sustainablehouse.ca/ NEXT MEETING DECEMBER 10, 2014 4:00 — 5:30 P.M. Tentative Location: MONTECO 2 St. Claire Ave West, Suite 2100, Toronto, Ontario, M4V 11.5 Page 15 GTAA PARTNERSIN PROJECT GREEN Energy Performance Committee Collective Project How are we going to drive the adoption of EVs? 24% of Canada's GHG emissions attributed to transportation Gas powered vehicles emit 10X as much GHG emissions as EVs 20.3 million conventional vehicles on the road in Canada 700 EVs in Canada — WWF 2020 Goal: 600,000 <20 public charging stations in the Pearson Eco -Business Zone 7:1 electric vehiclexharging station ratio in Ontario Networked charging station installed cost = $5,000-$20,000+ High upfront cost = biggest barrier for installation Q: Why is funding for this collective project needed? A: To lower the upfront cost of charging stations and boost early adoption GTAA PROJECT PARTNER IN Energy Performance Committee Collective Project oa=.EUZOxF Project Summary Vision Lay the foundation for an EV Network that will reduce GHG emissions associated with transportation in the zone Objective Work with businesses, municipalities, utility, and institutional stakeholders in the Greater Toronto Area to install 50-100 charging stations by the end of 2014 1) Develop a visible, accessible, and open network of charging stations spanning multiple software applications Outcomes 2) Drive the adoption of electric vehicles 3) Generate a track record of successful case studies and valuable resources 4) Obtain use data and equate to GHG emissions avoidances 5) Obtain widespread recognition for all project stakeholders W" An initiative of Toronto and Region Conservation (TRCA) 8 Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) www.partnersinprojectgreen.com 13 IM GTAA PARTNERSINEner Performance Committee Collective Project v PROJECT GREEN 9Y Project Details Project Value: $300k - $2.5M: 50-100 charging stations II. $2,000 - $5,000 hardware cost/station III. $4,000 - $20,000 per installation Proposed Incentive Model: 50% of total project costs up to a max of $4,000 per organization Incentive Considerations: 0 All EPC members eligible II. External participants eligible at discretion of EPC Participant Eligibility Terms • PPG Membership Status • Install Networked Charging Stations • On-site + Online PPG Branding • Data Collection + Sharing • Case Study Creation Prospective Participants Vendors YORKE�✓ Pratt& Whitney Canada Schneider I g„n, ¢N¢N w .��-�Electrlc @chargemycar On ttl. Reotl l entall Kennedy SUN C{JUNF}�Y a BRAMCity PTON WATERFRONToronto V V Leads Other Partners Seneca 10, 4*WWF ��fleetcarma. Am`� METROLINX men e5 P*- HUMBER �r °”" °" °"" Smart CommuAe GTAA PARTNERSIN PROJECT GREEN Waste Management Committee Collective Project An alternative for diverting organic waste? I-- A �Jlllllll • IC&1 diversion of organics waste a major challenge, roughly 700,000 tonnes of organic waste to landfill every year in Ontario. • Are localized on-site diversion solutions viable? Businesses and municipalities are asking. , ;4 • Collective project to deploy and test technologies and assess environmental and business cases. • Will lead to a PPG program that promotes solutions to organic waste diversion. Q: Why is funding for this collective project needed? A: To fund assessment of on-site organics technologies as a viable solution PARTNERSIN PROJECT GREEN A 11PFZ N Ir. BUSINESS ZOYE Waste Management Committee Collective Project Project Overview t� • Organics Diversion Pilot Project Vision Assess the environmental performance and the business case of various technologies to determine whether on-site systems are a viable option for organics waste diversion Deployment of 5 on-site organics waste processing systems, and execution of lab Objective testing to examine water implications. 1) Determine if on-site systems area viable option for organics diversion 2) Understand water implications and determine opportunity for water diversion Outcomes 3) Direct impact of minimum 6 tonnes waste diversion per site. 4) Develop the knowledge and relationships to launch an on organics program that includes traditional and on-site organics diversion solutions to the Pearson Eco - Business Zone An initiative or Toronto and Region Conservation (TRCA) & Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) www.partnersinprojectgreen.com 13 Im I GT­ PARTNERSINWaste Management Committee Collective Project PROJECT GREEN g Project Details Project Value: $57,000k • 5 sites for 3 months • Water testing = $30,000 • $5,000 water test equipment costs • $5,000 lab testing per site • Technology Costs = $27,000 • $1,500 per month for onsite systems Proposed Incentive Model: 100% of water test equipment costs 100% of lab testing costs Remaining Costs: • 100% of system deployment costs by technology provider is Participant Eliaibilitv Terms • Install on-site organics system • Participate in water testing • Data Collection + Sharing • Bea PPG member Prospective Participants 0— Bentall Kennedy WOODBI NE ��[: v• n 1 A� w a x GREENSCIENCE Jr acxwo�ecica I Technology Providers GREENSCIENCETot • ally Green ENVIRO=PURE SYSTEMS A TAI COMPANY o° cYc � m `PC ENL4i Leads Other Partners YORK Region Ld Peel �>©ntana WonRiltq Ton �o t MIN STFYr Of THE FNVF7DNM£NT ' v/ uNIVF PSiIf '.1 Nov EP51iv /1 Con`sewation GTAA AIRCANADA for The Living City GTAA PARTNERSINWater Stewardship Committee Collective Project v PROJECT GREEN p . oE.w�o.,�a.a�, �Eu.<:., Reduce footprint & improve stormwater management • Water -related insurance claims now lead property claims at $1.7 billion/yr • July 8, 2013 storm expected to cost insurers over $850 million • All 9 GTA watersheds face important water quality issue long Mnrez,M�fflvnhl . 20,830,000 m2 of impermeable roofs in the Eco -Business Zone (18% of total area) 47,730,000 m2 of paved surfaces in the Eco -Business Zone (40% of total area) #1 water -related concern for Canadians is surface water aual Q: Why is funding for this collective project needed? A: To fund stormwater management projects and facilitate industry replication GTAA PARTNERSIN PROJECT GREEN Pt«,o� ECa 605ixEA I.., F3 L Vision Objective Outcomes Water Stewardship Committee Collective Project Project Summary Support sustainable corporations focused on water stewardship, through collaborative projects geared to reduce water footprint and strengthen stormwater management Provide collaborative support and develop an approved vendor network to facilitate replicable implementation of stormwater management technologies 1) Direct impact to Water Stewardship water footprint reduction metrics 2) Bringing industry recognition to collaborative sustainable project models 3) Showcasing innovative water stewardship technologies and systems 4) Molson Coors: 34,400 square feet of stormwater management infrastructure installed = approximately 2.6 million L of rainwater harvested or infiltrated on-site 5) Ca/stone: 42,000 square feet of stormwater management infrastructure installed = approximately 3.2 million L of rainwater harvested or infiltrated on-site An initiative of Toronto and Region Conservation (TRCA) 8 Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) www.partnersinprojectgreen.com 13 IM GTAA PARTNERSIN PROJECT GREEN . �. na_10x ELOBUSiNEA ZOV L Project Value: Water Stewardship Committee Collective Project Project Details I. 2014 - $75,000: 650 sq. ft. permeable pavement pathway and a 7,500 sq. ft. permeable parking lot Proposed Incentive Model: • $25,000 of direct project costs to be funded by Water Stewardship Committee Remaining Costs: • 50% of project costs to be provided by contributions from technology and engineering firms • 50% of project costs to be provided by Molson-Coors' internal capital funding 0Participant Eligibility Terms • Unique marketing opportunity • Stormwater management feature(s) • Monitoring and testing of feature(s) • Showcasing of innovative technologies • Industry collaboration/recognition Prospective Participant MOLSON N.7 i Technology Providers 15 �s Imbrium Other Partners _i'XCG WaterTAP SECHNOLOCiY ACCELEMTION GR0.IEOT CToronto and Regionrr� SustainableTechnologies onservation �[� Evaluation Program for The Living City' A Fosrenng sussainabd�ry through urnovasron CVC GTAA PARTNERSIN PROJECT GREEN RII. rIo.• I. x1� L,.I Project Value: Water Stewardship Committee Collective Project Project Details I. 2014 - $125,000: 42,000 sq. ft. rainwater harvesting site that feeds into a 4,200 sq. ft. employee green space and a 4,200 sq. ft. water infiltration system Proposed Incentive Model: • $25,000 of direct project costs to be funded by Water Stewardship Committee Remaining Costs: • 50% of project costs to be provided by in-kii contributions from technology and engineering firms and Calstone Inc. funding • 50% of project costs to be provided by Ministry of Environment's Showcasing Water Innovation grant funding and City of Toronto's Hometown Heroes grant funding = Participant Eligibility Terms I • Aligns with company's 30th anniversary • Stormwater management feature(s) • Monitoring and testing of feature(s) • Showcasing of innovative technologies • On-site green space and replication Prospective Participant CALSTONE INC• Your Fwmrwe Sr,lvnnrra f iiOwbrr Technology Providers /XL'G r,i..o-.,vmu E�,e.� s xrron Imbrium WaterTAP TECHNCLC©Y PCGELEMTION P9QIEOT Other Partners Toronto and Region �JTEP Conservation Sustain Program for The Living City Evaluation Program 0 �Qrs#driq CVC MINrSTRY OF THE EN6'PONMENT GTAA PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN Water Stewardship Committee Collective Project -� 2015-2016 Outlook MOLSON &V? 0 Phase II 0 Phase III 2015 — $200,000: 7,700 sq. ft. green I. 2016 — $200,000: Showcase of effluent roof and 18,600 sq. ft. rainwater treatment solutions harvesting system for truck washing Capital expenditure request for 2015 Phase 11 submitted to Brewery and Marketing Management July 2014 Leveraging 2014 successes to develop larger future projects Global demographic and market pressures for more productive urban regions, locations, and systems have instigated constant innovation in urban development and environmental management practices. In the 1990s, the most admired world cities were still struggling with end -of -pipe pollution management challenges. Amsterdam was still dumping untreated sewage into its historic city canals. Boston was implementing a major capital investment in sewage treatment facilities under court order. Today, just 20 years later, cities from Amsterdam to Boston to new cities in China are pursuing a far more ambitious goal: the transformation of urban districts into net producers of energy, food, and potable water. The basic function of urban areas is undergoing a transition from places and systems that are fueled by resources extracted from natural ecosystem stocks, to efficiency 'circular' managers of accumulated urban resource stocks, to primary producers of these basic resources. This transition in urban resources management has been paralleled in the global corporate sector. Companies such as Unilever and IKEA are making major strides in creating sustainable supply chains and circular resource management cycles in which consumer wastes are cycled back into their production processes. PRODUCTIVE CITY ROTTERDAM Source: Ne Is Nelson, Doepel Strijkers Architects, Delft Technical University, Wageningen University (2009) www. nelsonelson.com/ DSA -Nelson -renewable -city -report. pdf PRODUCTION SUPPLY DEMAND BALANCE Now Future Future Future BUILDING 91% Carbon .88% Residential 100% Solar, Fuels .50% Commercial -25% above local demand ENERGY 4% Nuclear Waste Heat -75% Greenhouses Waste Heat 5% Other -26% Warehouses TRANSPORT Petr61 100%Dectricity -63% Private Cars ENERGY 1 0100 WATER Ground Water Rain Water,Condensation 41% Residential +3% above local demand FOOD Global Supply Local Stacked 20m' Production *50% above local demand +� Greenhouses Space/Resident Source: Ne Is Nelson, Doepel Strijkers Architects, Delft Technical University, Wageningen University (2009) www. nelsonelson.com/ DSA -Nelson -renewable -city -report. pdf For two decades, principals at The Next Practice Ltd. (TNP) have played a central role in the establishment of best practices programs, and in the development and diffusion of new practices in sustainable urban development policy and management. One result is TNP's 'strategic design' framework. This framework guides the establishment of market ecosystems that support ambitious new forms of development and urban services provision. TRCA has retained TNP to help advance the organization's capacity to accelerate progress on sustainability in the Toronto region. As part of this undertaking, TNP is assisting the PPG team in a 'flagship project' to develop the proposed PPG Service Centre(s). Service Centres Feasibility & TRCA Strategy 1. MANDATE 2. SCOPE 3. STRATEGIC 1.2 Define Work 2.l. SCOPEask DESIGN Focus liA., OtM1er Project& WORKSHOP Gate 1. service Centres) Ptenices 3.1 Rryulrememz .sta9e3 &Oblaaivas .Act ve ztmmgy& 22 Veil- Target 1.2 Dafina Stretch nnovafions 3.31mplicatlom Project Amblikons& Portnesentiee - Requirement Impact Tergez c—cratl DIden to for PearsonI - mnt.1h)-clJAM Pae4to business Zone offerings buzinezz 33 Revised Planning swvl—Gnbelsl apt& .t„<•Br TNP Su000rt PPG Business Planning & TRCA Practice Implications 4, BUSINESS S. SPECIFY & PIANNING PILOT 4.1 lonelhikh 5.1 Solution orpr=1 nnituUonel Project)specNiclne.hip for strze'kr)-igoro on reviewlabsRhin a plan 5.25olution or revie 4.2 Build Me project specRic required alliance Pilot &Financial .Deaizion to Plans pllm&invest , Specifically, TNP is providing a 6 -hour Strategic Design Workshop for PPG stakeholders. The workshop will facilitate an exploration of the full range of requirements needed within the Eco -business Zone to achieve ambitious sustainability targets for the district. On this basis, the PPG team will further develop its proposal for one or more service centres that will help local businesses and institutions collaboratively achieve these targets.