Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-20_Minutes_Executive_Committee_2021-01-15Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Executive Committee Meeting #8/20 was held via videoconference, on Friday, January 15, 2021, pursuant to section C.12 of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Board of Directors Administrative By -Law. The Chair Jennifer Innis, called the meeting to order at 9:32 a.m. PRESENT Jennifer Innis Chair Jack Heath Vice -Chair Paul Ainslie Member Ronald Chopowick Member Dipika Damerla Member Joanne Dies Member Jennifer Drake Member Paula Fletcher Member Gordon Highet Member Linda Jackson Member Anthony Perruzza Member The Chair recited the Acknowledgement of Indigenous Territory RES.#1381/20 - MINUTES Moved by: Linda Jackson Seconded by: Jennifer Drake THAT the Minutes of Meeting #7/20 of the Executive Committee, held on November 6, 2020 be approved. CARRIED Section I — Items for the Board of Directors Action SECTION 28 REGULATION MAPPING To seek Board of Directors' endorsement of the annual update to TRCA's Section 28 Regulation mapping based upon the most current information available related to regulated natural hazards and natural features. Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Paul Ainslie THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS in 2019, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff undertook the first jurisdiction -wide update to TRCA's Section 28 Regulation mapping update since 2006 in consultation with member municipalities, the public, and the building industry; AND WHEREAS at TRCA Board of Directors Meeting #6/19, held on Friday, June 21, 2019, Resolution #A116/19 was approved directing staff to continue to make updates to TRCA Regulation mapping on an annual basis; AND WHEREAS staff have completed the annual regulation mapping updates for 2020 to reflect the most currently available information; THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the 2020 updates to TRCA's regulation mapping as set out in this report be endorsed by the TRCA Board of Directors for internal use, for municipal staff screening purposes, and for public viewing on TRCA's website; AND FURTHER THAT the Clerk and Manager, Policy, so advise the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, TRCA municipal partners, Conservation Ontario and the BILD TRCA Working Group. CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA has a regulatory permitting responsibility to protect people, the environment and property from natural hazards associated with flooding, erosion and slope instability, and to conserve valleylands, wetlands, watercourses and the shoreline of Lake Ontario. Pursuant to Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act, TRCA administers a "Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation", (the Regulation), approved by the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry and known as Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended. Key objectives of the Regulation include preventing or reducing the risk to life and property; minimizing negative impacts on natural features, functions, and systems; and preventing the creation of new hazards or aggravation of existing hazards. The Regulation enables TRCA to prohibit or regulate development in areas of land associated with natural hazards, wetlands and watercourses, collectively known as TRCA's Regulated Area. In the Conservation Authorities Act, "development" is defined as: • Construction, reconstruction, erection or placing of a building or structure of any kind; • Any change to a building or structure that would have the effect of altering the use or potential use of the building or structure, increasing the size of the building or structure or increasing the number of dwelling units in the building or structure; Site grading; or Temporary or permanent placing, dumping or removal of any material, originating on the site or elsewhere. The Regulation also prohibits, in the absence of a permit from TRCA, alteration of the channel of a watercourse and interference with a wetland. The areas of land where TRCA's Regulation applies are: • River and stream valleys, including valleys with stable and unstable slopes, plus an allowance of 15 metres surrounding the valley; • Floodplains and areas subject to stream -related erosion (meander belts) where valleys are not clearly defined on the landscape, plus an allowance of 15 metres surrounding these areas; • Lake Ontario Shoreline, including associated flooding, erosion, slope instability and dynamic beach erosion hazards, plus an allowance of 15 metres inland from these areas; • Watercourses; • Wetlands and areas surrounding wetlands, where development could interfere with the hydrologic function of a wetland (areas of interference). This includes 120 metres surrounding Provincially Significant Wetlands, wetlands on the Oak Ridges Moraine and 30 metres surrounding all other wetlands. (It should be noted that in 2019, TRCA implemented a permit streamlining measure to reduce the extent of the area of interference from 120 metres to 30 metres for mapped wetlands within the Province's Greater Golden Horseshoe Built Boundary, as updated by TRCA staff to include built urban areas since 2006); and • Hazardous lands, which are lands that could be unsafe for development due to flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches or unstable soil or bedrock. Each of these natural hazards and environmental features and the associated regulated areas are described in law through the text of the Regulation. However, given the specific geographic areas to which the Regulation applies, and the need to represent these areas visually, the Regulation also provides for the creation of Regulation mapping. This mapping can be updated by TRCA as new information becomes available. At Board of Directors Meeting #6/19, held on Friday, June 21, 2019, Resolution #A116/19 was approved as follows regarding the staff report on the jurisdiction -wide update Regulation mapping update: WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff have undertaken the first jurisdiction -wide update to TRCA's Section 28 Regulation mapping update since 2006, in consultation with member municipalities, the public, and the building industry; WHEREAS TRCA staff are committed to working cooperatively with all of TRCA's municipal partners, landowners, the Building Industry and Land Development Association (GILD) and stakeholders regarding the implementation of TRCAs regulatory permitting responsibilities under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act, including opportunities to streamline the approval process; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the updates to TRCA's regulation mapping as set out in this report be endorsed by the TRCA Board of Directors for internal use, for municipal staff screening purposes, and for public viewing on TRCA's website; THAT staff continue to make updates to the Regulation mapping on an annual basis; AND FURTHER THAT the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Ministry of Environment Conservation and Parks, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, TRCA municipal partners and Conservation Ontario be so advised. TRCA staff have now completed the 2020 annual update to the Regulation mapping in consultation with TRCA development, infrastructure and technical review staff. It should be noted that the amendments to the Conservation Authorities Act under schedule 6 of Bill 229, do not affect the Regulation mapping. TRCA's Ontario Regulation 166/06 remains in effect until such time as the Province establishes a new regulation for all conservation authorities under the yet to be proclaimed amended section 28 provisions of the Act. TRCA Policy Planning staff will continue to monitor the ERO for provincial initiatives that may affect TRCA's policies and procedures with respect to its Regulation and regulation mapping and will keep TRCA staff and the Board informed accordingly. RATIONALE Regulation Mapping: What it is and how it works TRCA's Regulation mapping is a tool that conceptually shows the area of land within TRCA's jurisdiction that is likely to be subject to the Regulation. The Regulation limit boundary is based on the best technical information available to TRCA at the time of the preparation of the map. The mapping represents spatial information for each of the regulated features and areas, which is integrated to form one conceptual boundary of the Regulation limit. TRCA's Reference Manual — Determination of Regulation Limits provides the standards and criteria used for the mapping of these features and areas. Technical analysis that supports the mapping includes flood plain studies, provincial wetland mapping, ecological land classification mapping, digital elevation models, aerial photography, watercourse meander belt analysis, watercourse location mapping and Lake Ontario shoreline hazard assessment studies. Site-specific investigations and studies are required to precisely define the location of hazards and features and the legal extent of the Regulation, which typically occurs through consultation between landowners and TRCA staff during the review of a development application or proposal. The mapping is not a "statutory map", which means that the mapping does not have the force of law. The actual regulatory requirements are found within the provisions of Ontario Regulation 166/06. The mapping is best considered as a screening tool for TRCA, municipalities and the public that indicates where the Regulation likely applies, thereby assisting with implementation of TRCA's regulatory permitting responsibilities. This contrasts with a more rigid boundary such as a schedule of a municipal zoning by-law. The Regulated Area is not a Development Limit The mapping does not indicate areas where development is prohibited, but rather areas where development will need to take into consideration certain constraints from natural hazards or features, and for which a permit is required from TRCA prior to development activity commencing. In addition to facilitating TRCA's permitting responsibilities, the mapping is also used to inform: • Solicitor/Realtor Property Inquiries; • TRCA's delegated responsibility to represent the provincial interest for natural hazards; and • TRCA's review of applications under the Planning Act and Environmental Assessment Act, as described through Memorandums of Understanding for plan input and plan review with TRCA's municipal partners; • Municipal Comprehensive Reviews including natural heritage systems mapping, including natural hazard mapping, and land needs assessment. • Comprehensive Zoning By-law updates, including hazard land mapping Improving the accuracy of the mapping through this comprehensive update and consultation is particularly timely given that municipalities are currently undertaking Municipal Comprehensive Reviews for conformity to recently amended provincial plans, such as "A Place to Grow: The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe". TRCA planning and GIS staff have been working with planning staff at the City of Toronto and at Durham, York and Peel Regions to provide data layers from the updated regulation mapping to inform their land needs assessment for municipal growth planning. Updated Regulation Mapping Protocol TRCA has the ability to update the mapping as new information becomes available. Updates to the Regulation mapping improve its accuracy with respect to what is likely regulated by TRCA, thereby enhancing certainty for landowners considering or proposing development. This also assists both TRCA and municipal staff conducting development and infrastructure reviews. The last jurisdiction -wide update was completed in 2019. Since that time, flood plain mapping updates have taken place which have been taken into account in the newly updated mapping for 2020. The September 25, 2020 Board of Directors meeting included a report from the TRCA Engineering Services business unit on the jurisdiction -wide, flood plain mapping update. This report was circulated to TRCA's municipal and government partners and stakeholders and the flood plain mapping was made publicly available on TRCA's website. Development and Infrastructure planning and permitting staff have been using this information since that time to inform their review of applications. The current 2020 annual update to the existing regulation mapping has been undertaken to reflect new technical information on current aerial photography. In 2019, we committed to establishing a protocol for conducting and tracking future incremental mapping updates in a consistent and timely manner, and to report on annual updates to the Board. Coordination between the internal Policy Planning and Business and Data Analytics (BIDA) teams resulted in a codified workflow and protocols describing project scope, timeline, and staff roles and responsibilities. Staff established an internal consultation process involving an open call for update requests from development and environmental assessment plan review staff and technical staff (engineers and ecologists), use of an internal online mapping platform for tracking and enabling staff review of proposed updates, and working sessions conducted with plan review and technical staff to review specific update requests. The product of this effort is updated draft Regulation mapping. TRCA is following the guidance provided by Conservation Ontario for regulation mapping updates. It is important to note that only the mapping is being updated; there are no legislative changes to the text of the Regulation driving the mapping update. Furthermore, there is no legal requirement for municipal council approval of the updated mapping. Regulation Mapping Update Results Changes to the mapping include: • Revised wetland and area of interference limits associated with new and updated wetland evaluations and mapping by Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry and TRCA; • Adjustments to flood hazard limits as a result of updated floodplain mapping, as referenced above; • Changes to features and hazards resulting from as -built development approved by TRCA (e.g. watercourse channel realignments); • Adjustments to wetland area of interference limits in urban areas (i.e., updates to the Greater Golden Horseshoe Built Boundary by TRCA staff to reflect current built developments/areas); and • General refinement of regulated features resulting from detailed site examination and field verification of properties through the development and infrastructure review processes (e.g. top of bank staking) and/or site visits. Tracking, Notification, and Future Updates Once endorsed, staff will distribute the updated mapping to TRCA municipalities for their use. TRCA will notify Conservation Ontario and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, as well as neighbouring conservation authorities and stakeholders, of the update. In addition, the publicly available "Regulated Area Search Tool" on TRCA's website will be updated to include the new mapping. Changes to the Regulation mapping are tracked in TRCA's Geographic Information System (GIS) databases and will be recorded on each of TRCA's 132 Regulation maps that span the jurisdiction. Regularly updated regulation mapping will continue to ensure that TRCA staff, municipalities, stakeholders and the public have the most accurate and current information to inform decision- making. Updated mapping also contributes to TRCA's service delivery improvement efforts, for example in pre -consultation meetings and walk-in/online planning services, and by providing updated information to help enhance coordination between TRCA and municipal staff. Implementation and Transition The implementation of the updated mapping will not result in any changes to the day to day functions and procedures for TRCA's roles. It is important to reiterate that the Regulation mapping does not undermine the decisions made through the development review process and applications in progress will not have to "re -start" the process based on being inside an area affected by the mapping updates. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategies set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan Strategy 2 — Manage our regional water resources for current and future generations Strategy 4 — Create complete communities that integrate nature and the built environment Strategy 8 — Gather and share the best sustainability knowledge Strategy 12 — Facilitate a region -wide approach to sustainability FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding to support policy and planning input and GIS services for the mapping products was provided by capital funding from TRCA's participating municipalities in account 120-12. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Following Board endorsement, TRCA staff will: o conduct a quality control check on the December 2020 draft mapping and distribute the final updated Regulated Area mapping to member municipalities o update the existing mapping search tool on TRCA's website with the final updated Regulated Area mapping and place notification on website o continue to monitor the mapping for future changes that will be compiled and implemented on an annual basis o continue to monitor the ERO for provincial initiatives that have implications for TRCA's Regulation and regulation mapping, and keep TRCA staff and the Board informed accordingly. o Training with municipal staff on the regulation mapping or the regulation upon request o Continue to provide regulation mapping criteria data layers to municipalities for Municipal Comprehensive Reviews, zoning by-law updates, etc., upon request o Continue to keep the building industry informed on mapping updates and other initiatives through the TRCA BILD Working Group and provide training upon request. Summary TRCA has completed an annual update of its regulation mapping across the jurisdiction with input from development and environmental assessment plan review and technical staff (planners, engineers and ecologists). The regulation limit shown on the mapping is not a development limit but rather a conceptual illustration of natural features and hazards development needs to take into account for possible constraints due to natural hazards or features, and for which a permit is required from TRCA prior to development activity commencing. The mapping is used by TRCA development and infrastructure review staff, policy planning staff and enforcement and compliance staff to inform our roles and responsibilities in planning, infrastructure and permit review processes, and supports municipalities in their comprehensive planning projects. To ensure a smooth transition between the current and the updated regulation mapping, TRCA will ensure communication with our municipal partners, including training and education on the mapping and on TRCA roles where requested. The improved accuracy of the mapping achieved through this annual update will continue through ongoing and comprehensive annual updates and continuing dialogue with stakeholders such as BILD. Ultimately, these exercises help to increase certainty, effectiveness and efficiencies for all stakeholders in review and approval processes. Report prepared by: Jessica Murray, extension 6437 and Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5763 Emails: jessica.murrav(&trca.ca, marvann.burns(u)trca.ca For Information contact: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281, Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5763 Emails: laurie.nelson(&trca.ca, marvann.burns(a)trca.ca Date: January 15, 2021 RES.#B83/20 - 2020 COMPENSATION SUMMARY REPORT Second annual report to the Executive Committee on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Ecosystem Compensation Program using summary statistics from TRCA's ecosystem compensation database. The report contains a summary of outcomes and performance of the program with recommendations for improvement where needed. Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Paula Fletcher THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the 2020 Compensation Summary Report be received; THAT staff be directed to continue to work with external stakeholders to implement the recommendations outlined in the report; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to continue to report annually to the Executive Committee and Board of Directors on the status of the Compensation Program, to conduct an update to the report in 2021 consulting with the Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD), the Province and municipal partners, and to review program performance against the goals stated in the Ecosystem Compensation Management Framework. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Authority Meeting #5/18, held on June 22, 2018, Resolution #A85/18 was approved in part as follows: THAT staff be directed to track compensation where TRCA is implementing the compensation actions and report to the Authority on project outcomes, financial accounting and overall program successes; Ecosystem compensation has been used for several years as a tool to help address unavoidable natural feature losses due to land use changes under the Planning Act, Conservation Authorities Act, and Environmental Assessment process for public infrastructure projects. With the introduction of compensation policy within the 2014 TRCA Living City Policies (RES.#A186/14), the June 2018 adoption of TRCA's Guideline for Determining Ecosystem Compensation (RES.#A85/18) (hereafter referred to as the "Guideline"), and the Ecosystem Compensation Management Framework (2019) (hereafter referred to as the "Framework"), TRCA has been successful at managing compensation as an effective program resulting in increasingly positive outcomes when compensation is required as a last resort. Further, TRCA's compensation program has proven to be a model that can be applied by municipalities, other conservation authorities and partner agencies. Since 2017, TRCA has received $9,496,000 in compensation funds for natural feature restoration and land acquisitions, of which $8,311,000 was projected to be expended by the end of 2020. The remaining funds have been allocated -to specific projects for future implementation, monitoring, and maintenance. Of these restoration and acquisition projects, 93% were implemented in the same municipality where the impact occurred, and 87% were implemented in the impacted watershed. As a part of this governance structure outlined in the Framework, regular reporting is to be brought to TRCA's Executive Committee and Board of Directors summarizing the status of compensation projects implemented by TRCA, providing an update on the program successes and challenges, and outlining recommendations for future program improvements. This regular reporting is to occur on an annual basis. This report is the second iteration of the annual reporting. Highlights in the 2020 Annual report include: • In 2020, TRCA received $3,034,000 as compensation funds from 16 compensation projects; • In 2020 TRCA implemented 16 restoration projects, totalling 15.8 ha of terrestrial habitat, 1230 linear metres of aquatic habitat and 2 in -stream barrier removals, costing $3,089,000 and using funds received from various years; • For the losses where funds were received between 2017-2020, there is projected net gain for terrestrial habitat of 14.0 ha. The detailed breakdown appears below in Table 1. Table 1 — Com ensation Program Summary of Losses and Gains between 2017-2020 In 2020, TRCA significantly improved the time frame for implemention and met most targets set in 2019. 0 100% of projects were started within 1 year; 0 96% of projects completed active implementation within 2 years; 0 93% of projects will completed all phases within 7 years of receiving funds. The Guideline was adopted by TRCA in 2018; therefore, it can be difficult to draw comprehensive conclusions on how it is being applied since there is a limited sample size thus far. That being the case, the attached report (Appendix 1) presents a snapshot of current compensation activities at TRCA. In this report, a comparison was made between the last four years (when the Guideline was being developed) and older projects to show the significant improvements that have been realized since formalizing the compensation process. RATIONALE TRCA's Living City Policies and the Guideline firmly entrench the concept of compensation in the mitigation hierarchy, recommending feature removal with compensation only as a last resort, after all options for protection have been exhausted. The purpose of the Guideline is to provide guidance on how to determine the total amount of compensation required to replace lost or altered ecosystems, in a repeatable and transparent manner, after it has been decided through the planning process, often by senior levels of government or other bodies, such as the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, that unavoidable losses will result. In order to ensure a coordinated, effective, transparent, accountable and adaptive approach to this aspect of managing TRCA's Compensation Program, TRCA staff developed a governance document (the Framework). The Framework outlines the tools and processes used to apply funds that have come to TRCA as a result of ecosystem compensation agreements. The Stream Forest Wetland Riparian Meadow Total Compensation Type Trottal (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) Terrestrial etres Restoration Required 14.7 60.3 21.0 0.7 12.6 94.6 Total Restoration Secured 71 72.9 29.5 4.6 1.6 108.6 (Completed + Future) Restoration -7.4 12.6 8.5 3.9 11.1 14.0 Balance In 2020, TRCA significantly improved the time frame for implemention and met most targets set in 2019. 0 100% of projects were started within 1 year; 0 96% of projects completed active implementation within 2 years; 0 93% of projects will completed all phases within 7 years of receiving funds. The Guideline was adopted by TRCA in 2018; therefore, it can be difficult to draw comprehensive conclusions on how it is being applied since there is a limited sample size thus far. That being the case, the attached report (Appendix 1) presents a snapshot of current compensation activities at TRCA. In this report, a comparison was made between the last four years (when the Guideline was being developed) and older projects to show the significant improvements that have been realized since formalizing the compensation process. RATIONALE TRCA's Living City Policies and the Guideline firmly entrench the concept of compensation in the mitigation hierarchy, recommending feature removal with compensation only as a last resort, after all options for protection have been exhausted. The purpose of the Guideline is to provide guidance on how to determine the total amount of compensation required to replace lost or altered ecosystems, in a repeatable and transparent manner, after it has been decided through the planning process, often by senior levels of government or other bodies, such as the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, that unavoidable losses will result. In order to ensure a coordinated, effective, transparent, accountable and adaptive approach to this aspect of managing TRCA's Compensation Program, TRCA staff developed a governance document (the Framework). The Framework outlines the tools and processes used to apply funds that have come to TRCA as a result of ecosystem compensation agreements. The Framework is to be applied in all cases where compensation funds are directed to TRCA (typically when off-site compensation is required), via an approved agreement, for ecological restoration projects and/or conservation land securement. The Framework recognizes the collaborative nature of the compensation process, the varying roles of the parties involved, and the need for coordination, particularly with TRCA's municipal partners. Although the Framework focuses on TRCA's role in the process, the tools and approaches outlined can also be adapted and used by others to manage compensation decisions and actions. The implementation of ecosystem compensation is complex and can vary from case to case. As such, it can be a challenge to achieve a consistent approach between the proponent and/or regulatory agency. The Guideline outlines a repeatable process for determining compensation requirements when an unavoidable natural feature loss is identified. A robust governance structure (the Framework) that is understood and supported by partners is critical to ensure that compensation decisions and practices are applied fairly, consistently, accurately, openly, and efficiently. Using performance measures that are rooted in these considerations will help to identify successes and challenges associated with implementing restoration for compensation, as well as the ecosystem Compensation Program as a whole. The performance review will produce clear recommendations that guide future actions and improve compensation. The Compensation Program Summary Report is a guidance document outlining actions that can be taken to ensure that future compensation projects are held to a high standard. Table 2 outlines the Framework goals, with measures that reflect those goals, and mechanisms that can be used to rate overall program performance. These measures have been used as the basis for the Compensation Program performance review. Table 2 — Compensation Program Performance Measures Goal Measure Mechanism No Net loss . Natural features and area losses Deliverables Database compared to gains GIS layers The difference between the calculations of losses compensation requirements as vs. restored target determined by the Guideline compared to what is agreed to by all parties involved Accountability . The degree to which the TRCA Ecosystem Compensation Management Framework is followed • Tracking decision making and accounting processes • Overall cost accounting to determine efficiencies in program execution Transparency . The degree to which decisions, outcomes, processes and results of program assessments are available to interested parties. • Project Brief and Program Evaluation • Financial reporting, and success monitoring • Variance reporting for individual Projects • Reporting to the Authority Board • Financial reporting, and success monitoring Making Monitoring Reports available Consistency The difference between the Adherence to compensation requirements as standardized processes determined by the Guideline compared for determining to what is agreed to by all parties compensation ratios involved. and costing • Program Reporting and summary statistics Efficient and • The overall length of time the ends and means Timely compensation process is implemented analysis on adherence • Overall timing from when impact occurs to proposed timelines to when feature restoration and land Variance Reporting and securement is achieved. Project Tracking Adaptive Whether a comprehensive and critical Compensation program review of the compensation program is assessment and undertaken and opportunities for execution of improvements are acted on. recommendations • Reporting to the Authority Board • Workshops and stakeholder working groups • Updates to the Framework to address lessons learned and implementation issues as part of continuous improvement Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategies set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 2 — Manage our regional water resources for current and future generations Strategy 3 — Rethink greenspace to maximize its value Strategy 4 — Create complete communities that integrate nature and the built environment Strategy 9 — Measure performance FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are acquired for compensation on a file -by -file basis as special projects through cash -in lieu. Once an agreement is made between the proponent and TRCA, funds are immediately deposited in 119-99. Following the transfer, funds are typically deposited into a new or existing project account. If no project account has been initialized by year end, funds are transferred into a holding account for either future project implementation (940-22) or land acquisition (940-26). DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Informed with the information in this summary report, there are several items outlined below which will form the focus for program improvements and work to update the Framework over the course of 2021. • Continue to update the no net loss calculations as new file information is included into the Compensation Database; • Start tracking internal files through the Compensation Database to better demonstrate how TRCA is complying with the Guidelines; • Work with relevant staff to include land base losses due to land use changes and new infrastructure development in the Compensation Database; • Restoration costs have been updated in 2020 and with new tools TRCA can more accurately track costs on projects. Work with planners, Finance and Restoration and Infrastructure staff to refine values for associated work if needed and get endorsement for any cost increases; • Continue to complete database refinements to improve data input, reporting, communications. Continue to work closely with database development staff to identify and support resource needs to ensure these changes can be made in a timely manner; • Continue to fill in database information gaps to provide a more complete picture of compensation activities which includes all TRCA business units; • Continue to work with municipal partners and stakeholders to include information for all compensation activities; • Include template agreements with standard clauses that can be tailored in order to streamline the agreement process; • Continue regular meetings with the Program Review Team meetings to discuss further refinement to the application of the Framework; • Continue communication with partner agencies, proponents, practitioners, BILD and subject matter experts to provide support or update the science and principles behind the Guideline and the Management Framework; and • Continue to seek ways to add staff and other resources to increase our capacity and to implement more projects. Report prepared by: John Stille, extension 5396 Emails: john.stille(a)trca.ca For Information contact: John Stille, extension 5396 Emails: iohn.stille(aDtrca.ca Date: December 17, 2020 Attachments: 1 Attachment 1: 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report Prepared by TRCA Ecosystem Compensation Program Review Team January 2021 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report Executive Summary Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) formally adopted the Guideline for Determining Ecosystem Compensation in June 2018 (RES.#iA85/18). Following adoption, the Ecosystem Compensation Management Framework, which outlines how the workflow and allocation of compensation funds should be governed, was finalized in June 2019. The Ecosystem Compensation Management Framework recommends regular reporting to identify how well TRCA is meeting the goals and metrics that track performance. The first program summary was provided to the TRCA Board of Directors in 2019 (RES.#13120/19) and future reports are to be prepared annually to discuss TRCA's progress in relation to governance goals and reporting metrics laid out in the Framework in addition to highlighting yearly compensation activity and recommendations. It is important to note that this reporting only covers compensation for losses that have been applied through the planning process and where TRCA has received cash -in - lieu funding for restoration implementation. Instances where compensation is not achieved on a planning file or where compensation is applied and implemented by agencies other than TRCA are not captured in this assessment. Since 1994, TRCA has implemented 48% of the compensation projects being tracked; an additional 33% have restoration being actively planned or are in an implementation phase; and the remaining 19% are currently in negotiation, on hold, or cancelled. When compared to 2019 numbers, there is a 17% increase in restoration projects being planned in 2020 and a 32% increase in restoration project implementation. Between 2017 and 2020, TRCA received $9,649,000 in compensation funds for natural feature restoration and land acquisitions, of which $8,311,000 is projected to be expended by the end of 2020, while the remaining funds are allocated for future implementation, monitoring, and maintenance. Of these projects, 93% were implemented in the same municipality as the impact, and 87% were implemented in the same watershed. In 2020, TRCA received $3,034,000 in compensation funds from 16 compensation projects and will be using $3,089,000 to implement 16 restoration projects. Of the restoration projects implemented in 2020, 100% were in the same municipality as the impact, and 83% were in the same watershed This report shows that for the subset of losses where compensation was applied and funds were received as cash in - lieu (2017-2020), there is a projected net gain for terrestrial natural features (14.0 hectares). However, we see a net loss projected for meadow (-11.1 hectares) and stream habitats (-7.4 linear metres) due to undervaluing the true cost to restore these features. To address this, TRCA has updated restoration estimate costs with 2020 rates to be used in future discussions and will look for ways to continue to meet current habitat requirements with project efficiencies and leveraged funds. Outside of a few exceptions, TRCA has met the restoration implementation timelines establish in the 2019 summary report. With this report TRCA demonstrates that the program successfully manages compensation as an effective tool resulting in increasingly positive outcomes. TRCA's compensation program has proven to be a model that can be applied by municipalities, Conservation Authorities and other partner agencies. Several recommendations have been identified that will refine and improve the way the Ecosystem Compensation Program functions, including improvements to communications internally and externally, standardized agreements, data tracking and reporting, and updated restoration cost estimates. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report Table of Contents Background......................................................................................... ..................................... 3 Guideline for Determining Ecosystem Compensation....................................................................................................3 Ecosystem Compensation Management Framework.....................................................................................................3 Ecosystem Compensation Program Reporting...............................................................................................................4 Rationale.............................................................................................................................................................................4 Ecosystem Compensation Management Framework Goals...........................................................................................4 Goals: 2020 Detail on Status...............................................................................................................................................4 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary .....................::.........................................................................................4 Goal1: No Net Loss.........................................................................................................................................................9 Goal2: Accountability...................................................................................................................................................12 Goal 3: Transparency ......... .......................... ......... ......... .........................................12 Goal4: Consistency.......................................................................................................................................................13 Goal 5: Efficiency and Timeliness.................................................................................................................................16 Goal6: Adaptability......................................................................................................................................................18 Discussion and Recommendations...................................................................................................................................18 Goal1: No Net Loss.......................................................................................................................................................18 Goal 2: Accountability........., •......•. .......... ......... ......... .....................19 Goal 3: Transparency...................................................................................... ..................19 Goal4: Consistency.......................................................................................................................................................20 Goal 5: Efficiency and Timeliness.................................................................................................................................20 Goal6: Adaptability......................................................................................................................................................21 NextSteps.........................................................................................................................................................................21 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 1 2 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report BACKGROUND Guideline for Determining Ecosystem Compensation In June 2018, TRCA Board of Directors approved the adoption of the Guideline for Determining Ecosystem Compensation (RES.#A85/18) (hereafter referred to as the "Guideline"). The purpose of the Guideline is to provide guidance on how to determine the total amount of compensation required to replace lost or altered ecosystems in a consistent and transparent manner, after it has been decided through the planning or environmental assessment process that unavoidable losses will or must take place. The Guideline is written to assist planners, ecologists, landscape architects, landowners, engineers, and other practitioners and interested parties in understanding how compensation for ecosystem losses can be implemented. Promoting strategic and effective implementation of compensation restoration, the Guideline provides a standard and consistent approach, informed by science and decades of experience in the application of natural heritage planning and ecological restoration. Ecosystem Compensation Management Framework The Ecosystem Compensation Management Framework (June 2019) (hereafter referred to as the "Framework") outlines goals as well as the tools and processes needed to ensure an accountable, transparent, consistent, efficient, and adaptable approach to managing TRCA's Ecosystem Compensation Program. The Framework should be applied to all cases where funds are directed to TRCA via an approved agreement for implementing feature -based restoration and conservation land securement. The agreement would typically be an outcome of the municipal planning process; environmental assessment process; municipal tree/forest/natural feature by-laws implementation; Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (formerly the Ontario Municipal Board) agreements and orders; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Species at Risk (Overall Benefit) Permits; Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Fish Habitat Compensation; or other processes (e.g., National Energy Board decisions). The Framework uses existing tools including the Restoration Projects Database and Compensation Database, along with existing approaches TRCA has developed for effective project and program management. This Framework provides direction in situations where TRCA receives funds to implement ecosystem compensation, however, it also recognizes the collaborative nature of the compensation process, the varying roles of the parties involved, and the need for coordination, particularly with TRCA's municipal partners. Although this Framework focuses on TRCA's role in managing the Ecosystem Compensation Program, the tools and approaches can also be adapted by others for managing compensation decisions and actions for implementation and tracking. The Framework also defines two key groups in the Ecosystem Compensation Program. The first is a Project Review Team; one team is established for each file to review and approve proposed land development and infrastructure projects. This team consists of external partners (where appropriate) as well as TRCA staff from several business units including Development Planning and Permits, Infrastructure Planning and Permits, Engineering Services, Planning Ecology, Restoration and Resource Management, Finance, and Property and Risk Management. The second team is the Ecosystem Compensation Program Review Team, which is tasked with evaluating and reporting on the effectiveness of the overall Ecosystem Compensation Program approach as well as providing comment on individual projects that are very complicated or contentious. This team will consist of staff representing Development Planning and Permits, Infrastructure Planning and Permits, Policy Planning & Regulations, Planning Ecology, Restoration and Resource Management, Finance, and Property and Risk Management. To achieve efficiencies, both teams will aim to use the same staff for the duration of each project to ensure knowledge continuity. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report Ecosystem Compensation Program Reporting TRCA prepared the first annual Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report in 2019 (RES113120/19). Regular reporting will be brought to the TRCA Board of Directors to summarize the status of all ecosystem compensation projects implemented by TRCA, provide an update on the program (successes and challenges), and outline recommendations for future program improvements. This regular reporting will continue on an annual basis. In exceptional cases, such as high-profile projects, staff may report on compensation elements of projects separately. (Such projects would still be included in the annual reporting.) This report is the second iteration of this annual reporting. RATIONALE Ecosystem Compensation Management Framework Goals Below are the goals that guide the Framework. The goals have been adapted from the guiding principles outlined in the Guideline. 1. There is no net loss (and ideally a net gain) to the natural heritage system function due to impacts associated with land use changes or development and infrastructure impacts within the TRCA jurisdiction; 2. TRCA is accountable in the delivery of its compensation program; 3. The compensation process is transparent and traceable; 4. The compensation process is consistent; S. The compensation process is efficient and timely; and 6. An adaptable approach to management is regularly used to ensure that deficiencies are identified and recommendations for improvement are implemented. These goals guide the reporting on the performance of the Ecosystem Compensation Program, which is presented in the following section. GOALS: 2020 DETAIL ON STATUS Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary The information in this summary report was taken from TRCA's Compensation Database. The Compensation Database contains information collected by the Project Review Teams. Over the course of 2020, the database was updated with outstanding file information on completed compensation projects to provide a more holistic view of the Ecosystem Compensation Program at TRCA. Figure 1, Location and Current Status of TRCA Compensation Projects, maps the location of impacts or feature losses and compensation restoration projects across the jurisdiction from 1994 to 2020. These impact sites are symbolized by circles of assorted colours indicating their compensation status (inactive, in negotiations, or at various stages of planning, restoration, or completion). The restoration sites are symbolized as pink dots and are linked with a red line Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report to the associated impact sites. The map demonstrates that although restoration is targeted as close to the impact site as possible, other considerations are involved in siting decisions to ensure the maximum ecological benefit is achieved. Such considerations include TRCA's Integrated Restoration Prioritization (IRP) tool, coordination of leveraged opportunities with partners, availability of appropriate sites for restoration, and implementation timelines. Older projects that started before the Guideline and Framework may be farther from the impact site or cross boundary lines between municipalities or watersheds. In 2020, there were 16 new impact sites added to the map (Figure 2). 2020 also saw 16 restoration projects implemented and 52 restoration projects in other phases of completion from planning to monitoring and maintenance. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report N /V Ad,a6a Mono TosoroMio 2.5 5 10 Km Compensation Projects by Current Status u Ong 4 Humber �\ �Q 1/aughan } CP ✓ O • • VD \� o \,f 4 o • F Uxbridge v - Aurore DuNins Ca Pickering —'• Rouge t ! hmond -HillIt-EiPeni;oat G ! -� Markham s\ FfE j rO' 0 ' highland !• Oon I Tororlta Lake Ontario Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Date- 12/1/2020 Impact Status ! Restoration, Implementing o Restoration Project +� TRCA JurisdiCtion Created by: Restoration & Infrastructure Q Inactive -Cancelled O Restoration: Implemented project Link TNHS Disclaimer: The data used to create this map was compiled from a variety of 4 Inactive - On Hold 0 Res[oratiom. Monitoring/Assessments sources 8 dates. The TRCA takes no responsibility for en -ors or omissions in the ----- Municipality Wa[erbody data and retains the right to make changes & corrections at anytime without ! Process Started - In Negotiations • Restoration: Maintenance notice. Fa further Information about the data on this map, please contact the O TRCA Restoration and Infrastructure Division. (416) 661.6600. Restoration: Planning ! Complete FIGURE 1. LOCATION AND CURRENT STATUS OF COMPENSATION PROJECTS 1994-2020 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 6 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report Adjala t 5 Towrontio Mono 1 AN 0 J III Compensation Projects -A rc ossiTRCA Jurisdiction ,1 ti I W hitchurc MStouffviilc Aurora —, - t Uxbridge 5 lung ng _..rr 't '1;�� 96 Carruth 1 O 1 i' 1 Pickering O a .1 t O� aQ.,. i � Rouge t ^ 00 0 1 ` _ `_f""flichmond0 t- Markham i'{` O '! Hill O l\tlt O 0 CO" ❑ ! T O ' 1 Petticoat CCP ! t1 t O0 .\' Humber pt FO t5OVaughan o ci A01 00 _.0-- 04 L� O O O Highland O O 0 L o C6 Don 0 O �O 0 Toronto i firampton (+ 5 / 1 \` O O Mimics O , r Date: 12/17/2020 Cleated by: Restoration & IOffdSINCl Wr{, Disclaimer: The data used to create this map was compiled from a variety of sources B dates. The TRCA takes no responsibility for errors or omisslorrs in the data and retains the right to make changes 6 corrections at anytime without notice. For further Information about the data on this map, please contact the TRC.. Restoration and Infrastructure Divtsion, (4161661.6600. Mississauga Lake Ontario 0 0 2.5 5 10 Km Toronto and Region Conservation Authority • Restoration Project (2020 Implemented) O Compensation Project (Funds Receieved in 2020) Project Link Watershed o Restoration Project (All) O Compensation Project (All) ---- Municipality TNHS FIGURE 2. 2020 COMPENSATION PROJECTS ACROSS TRCA JURISDICTION Waterbody Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 7 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report Figures 3 and 4, Compensation Projects (1994-2020) by Current Status, illustrate where projects are in the compensation process. Note: the colour coding in Figure 1 corresponds to the colour coding in Figures 3 and 4. Currently, 48% of the compensation projects where cash -in -lieu has been received have been implemented (orange colours); 33% are being actively planned or are in an implementation phase (green colours); and the remaining 19% are currently in negotiation, on hold, or cancelled (blue & grey colours). When compared to 2019 numbers, there is a 17% increase in projects being planned, and a 32% increase in project implementing (projects in the first year of implementing a multiyear project) and being implemented (projects where implementation of the main restoration activity was completed). Completed project numbers cannot be compared to 2019, as the numbers will be skewed by the recent addition of some older data. The inclusion of this older data gives a more complete picture of the Ecosystem Compensation Program. Compensation Projects (1994-2020) by Current Status _ • Inactive -On Hold 4 rocess Started - In Negotiations 27 13% Implemented-- Implementing 14 14 7% 7% FIGURE 3. PIE CHART: COMPENSATION PROJEcfs (1994-2020) BY CURRENT STATUS • Restoration: Planning 52 26% Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 1 7 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report W N Y y 50 O 40 O Y H 30 c a a 0 20 0 V 0 10 u Compensation Projects (1994-2020) by Current Status 52 20 55 0o fie`'` o°�o Q,e`'`' P o w` 5� Pe Project Status FIGURE 4. BAR GRAPH: COMPENSATION PROJECTS (1994-2020) BY CURRENT STATUS Figure 5, Compensation Revenue and Expenditures (2017-2020), shows compensation funds received by TRCA as cash -in -lieu and expenditures to implement restoration projects. Between 2017 and 2020, TRCA received $9,649,000 in compensation funds for natural feature restoration and land acquisitions, of which $8,311,000 is projected to be expended by the end of 2020, while the remaining funds are allocated to be used for future implementation, monitoring, and maintenance. In 2020, TRCA received $3,034,000 in compensation funds and will be using $3,089,000 for restoration implementation. Figure 4 demonstrates that funds received by TRCA as cash -in -lieu and restoration expenditures are increasing over time. This does not necessarily indicate that approval authorities are permitting more feature removals with compensation, but rather that the full cost of restoration and land acquisition is now better accounted for and agreed Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 4 � A 0e6 °\a i° c Ne \Z 10 s`Oc o��o� \0 �\oc . o c o 0o fie`'` o°�o Q,e`'`' P o w` 5� Pe Project Status FIGURE 4. BAR GRAPH: COMPENSATION PROJECTS (1994-2020) BY CURRENT STATUS Figure 5, Compensation Revenue and Expenditures (2017-2020), shows compensation funds received by TRCA as cash -in -lieu and expenditures to implement restoration projects. Between 2017 and 2020, TRCA received $9,649,000 in compensation funds for natural feature restoration and land acquisitions, of which $8,311,000 is projected to be expended by the end of 2020, while the remaining funds are allocated to be used for future implementation, monitoring, and maintenance. In 2020, TRCA received $3,034,000 in compensation funds and will be using $3,089,000 for restoration implementation. Figure 4 demonstrates that funds received by TRCA as cash -in -lieu and restoration expenditures are increasing over time. This does not necessarily indicate that approval authorities are permitting more feature removals with compensation, but rather that the full cost of restoration and land acquisition is now better accounted for and agreed Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report to by all parties during negotiations. The graph also demonstrates the unpredictable nature of compensation funding: cash -in -lieu is higher in some years than others. Compensation Revenue and Expenditures $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 u $2.5 a u $2.0 v $1.5 m $1.0 0 _ $0.5 $0.0 2017 I� Land Base Revenue Restoration Expenditure 2018 2019 I� Land Base Expenditure Linear (Restoration Revenue) FIGURE 5. COMPENSATION REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES (2017-2020) 2020 I� Restoration Revenue Linear (Restoration Expenditure) The revenue and expense totals presented in Figure 4 may differ from TRCA's audited financial statements at fiscal year-end, as the totals were prepared prior to year-end and represent a subset of the compensation funds. Goal 1: No Net Loss The goal of no net loss is fundamental to TRCA's principles of ecosystem compensation, where outcomes aim to fully replace the same level of lost ecosystem structure and function in proximity to where the loss occurs and, where possible, achieve an overall gain. Ecosystem feature and function losses along with their required mitigation and compensation amounts are identified through the plan review process. If TRCA then receives funds as cash -in -lieu, deliverables are tracked and reported through standard project management practices. The Guideline is used to determine the amount of ecosystem compensation that is appropriately grounded in certain science -based assumptions, such as: • Basal area is a suitable proxy for forest stand biomass and function; • Restored areas are fully successful given 5 years of post -implementation monitoring and maintenance; and • With planting ratios applied, a 10 -year-old restoration site will be able to provide the same biomass back to the natural heritage system, which will eventually mature into a fully functioning forest. As this is the second annual report, we have not yet collected enough monitoring data to confirm that these assumptions are borne out by the data. Therefore, this iteration of the annual report defines no net loss as TRCA's ability to restore the required compensation areas with the cash -in -lieu funds received. With this definition of no net loss, the compensation required and the corresponding restoration should be equal. Required compensation areas were compared to restoration project areas (past, present, and future implementation) to assess how close the Ecosystem Compensation Program is to achieving no net loss. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report It is important to note several limits on the scope of the information presented. This summary does not include situations where losses occur to the natural heritage system and compensation is not achieved. As a result, not all losses are truly considered in this summary, and losses on the landscape are greater than presented here. Also not included in this assessment are compensation situations where restoration is implemented by other agencies (i.e., through a landowner or a consultant implementing on- or off-site compensation related to a loss). Therefore, the restoration area total may also be under -represented across TRCA's jurisdiction. Lastly, this summary does not attempt to look at compensation files older than 2017, as the same level of loss and restoration information is not readily available. However, there is sufficient information within the Compensation Database records (2017-2020) to assess whether TRCA projects will restore enough area to offset the losses to which compensation is applied during the planning process and received by TRCA as cash -in -lieu. Table la, Terrestrial Natural Feature Restoration Across TRCA's Jurisdiction by Type, compares the required compensation area to the restoration project area for projects where TRCA received cash -in -lieu funds between 2017- 2020. The table shows the area of each natural feature type broken down by (1) area required to be restored as applied through the Guideline (including treed ecosystem ratios); (2) natural features restored to date with compensation funds; (3) natural features to be restored with received compensation funds; and (4) the total restored area to be realized once all restoration projects are completed. The final row, Restoration Balance, is the required restoration compared against what will be restored. TABLE 1A. TERRESTRIAL NATURAL FEATURE RESTORATION ACROSS TRCA JURISDICTION BY TYPE (2017-2020) Terrestrial Natural Features (ha) Forest Wetland Riparian Meadow Total (1) Restoration Required 60.3 21.0 0.7 12.6 94.6 (2) Restoration Completed 12.1 15.0 4.2 0.0 31.3 (3) Future Restoration to be Completed (Based on funds in Account) 60.8 14.5 0.5 1.6 77.3 (4) Total Restoration Secured ((2) Completed + (3) Future) 72.9 29.5 4.6 1.6 108.6 Restoration Balance ((4)Total Restoration —(1)Required) 12.6 8.5 3.9 11.1 14.0 Like Table 1a, Table 1b Aquatic Natural Feature Restoration Across TRCA's Jurisdiction by Type, outlines the aquatic compensation currently being planned and demonstrates that if the restoration typical treatment (which standard costings is based on) is applied then the required amount of restoration (linear metres) will not be obtained. Therefore, project selection should favour a site that uses a more refined treatment than the typical treatment in order to maximize the restoration benefit achieved with the existing funds. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 10 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report TABLE 1B. AQUATIC NATURAL FEATURE RESTORATION ACROSS TRCA.IURISDICTION BY TYPE (2017-2020) Aquatic Natural Features (m) Stream (1) Restoration Required 14.7 (2) Restoration Completed 0.0 (3) Future Restoration to be Completed (Based on funds in Account) 7.3 (4) Total Restoration Secured 7.1 ((2) Completed + (3) Future) Restoration Balance ((4) Total Restoration — (1) Required) The results of Table la show that for this subset of losses where compensation was applied and funds were received as cash in -lieu, there is a projected net gain for terrestrial natural features (14.0 ha). However, when looking at the terrestrial natural feature types individually, we see a net loss projected for meadow habitat (-11.1 ha). This is the result of older agreements (2010s) undervaluing the cost to implement native meadow habitat restoration, a cost that has been refined by TRCA through implementation and research at The Meadoway Project in Toronto. Table lb shows a net loss for aquatic natural features (-7.4 m), which is due to undervaluing the cost to implement stream restoration. When TRCA's Restoration and Resource Management group does not have enough funding to undertake what has been requested or required, funds to implement projects will be used in the most efficient way possible to maximize restoration toward a no net loss scenario. In such cases, reaching no net loss may be possible by leveraging additional funds and/or finding efficiencies by reducing project elements such as site preparations, planting numbers, or habitat features. Conversely, efficiencies in project implementation that lead to surplus funds will be reinvested toward further restoration or project enhancements. The Framework directs that surplus funds first go toward offsetting underfunded projects to reach the required restoration targets. For example, restoration surplus following implementation is the reason for the projected 14.0 ha of terrestrial net gain. In addition to natural feature compensation, the Guideline also addresses replacing lost land base. The planning files that TRCA was involved with in 2020 did not result in new cash -in -lieu being received to compensate for lost land base. This is due to development land base losses being compensated for on-site. Note that, as stated in the Guideline, regional and municipal infrastructure projects do not necessarily require land base compensation, although the Guideline does suggest that TRCA track losses and work with municipalities to identify opportunities to provide land base back to the natural heritage system through TRCA's Greenland's Acquisition and municipal land securement programs. It should also be noted that the compensation requirements for Metrolinx projects (included in this report) follow the Metrolinx Vegetation Guideline requirements, which are based in part on the TRCA Guideline. Restoration to offset Metrolinx tree removals is also being implemented ahead of removals as a Best Management Practice and as part of the effort to reduce the time lag required for compensation plantings to grow. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 11 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report Goal 2: Accountability Assessing the level of accountability through the administration of the Ecosystem Compensation Program is an important measure of governance for two reasons. First, ecosystem compensation is often tied to agreements where specific outcomes are required. Agreements ensure transparent, consistent, and timely compensation. In support of this goal, the Program Review Team developed a compensation agreement template to ensure that principal elements are included in each agreement. Similarly, following the formal agreement execution, invoices are sent to the proponent to provide simple traceability of funds. Second, in situations where the proponent is not implementing the compensation themselves and funds are received by TRCA as cash -in -lieu, financial accountability ensures that the funds are used as intended. The Compensation Database tracks when and where compensation funds are used and demonstrates that required restoration targets are being met. The establishment of the Framework in 2019 has increased accountability as the Ecosystem Compensation Program becomes more integrated across departments. Workflow improvements (e.g., timely data entry and notification) in the Compensation Database reduced the administrative burden and increased the availability of information. Funds are tracked against required restoration targets in addition to standard financial project tracking. The Framework was implemented to guide and track the movement of funds for compensation, improve interdepartmental communications, and standardize reporting on program and project outcomes. As outlined in the Framework, reporting on individual files is completed by the Project Review Team, and annual program reports are prepared by the Program Review Team. This year the Restoration Site Selection Brief report was updated to make roles and responsibilities within the Project Review Team clearer. Thirty briefs were prepared this year and circulated within the Project Review Team for approval prior to starting restoration projects and transferring funds. Program reports, such as this one, help guide the future development of compensation practices at TRCA by reviewing goals, progress, and recommendations for further improvement. Goal 3: Transparency Compensation for lost natural features is executed at municipal, provincial, and federal levels through various by- laws, policies, and regulations. TRCA's role in compensation can be as a regulator, advisor, or compensation project implementer, therefore, transparency throughout the compensation process is important to achieve fairness and compliance in the execution of an Ecosystem Compensation Program. Through the Guideline and Framework, mechanisms have been developed to demonstrate transparency, including: • A clear description of how TRCA determines and executes compensation requirements; • Restoration Site Selection Briefs that outline the compensation requirements and restoration site selection decisions, and provide details on proposed implementation; • Project completion reports that summarize project implementation deliverables; • Post -construction assessment reporting 1, 3, and 5 years after completion, in addition to pre- and post - restoration implementation monitoring; • Financial tracking; and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 12 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report • Annual reporting to the TRCA Board of Directors on the overall Ecosystem Compensation Program Note that this reporting only covers projects implemented by TRCA. In the future, this type of reporting could be applied to projects implemented by other agencies. Over the course of 2020, older files were incorporated into the Compensation Database and more Restoration Site Selection Briefs were circulated within the Project Review Team. These efforts contributed to greater transparency across the Ecosystem Compensation Program. Goal 4: Consistency The Guideline stresses the need to ensure consistency throughout the compensation process. This applies to determining compensation requirements for lost natural features, calculating the cost of compensation lands, and implementing restoration projects, as well as ensuring that restoration projects meet a high standard. Mechanisms in the Framework facilitate consistency by providing: • Improved lines of communication between Project Review Team members by clearly defining team member roles and workflows throughout the life of a compensation project; • Specific targets and ratios to compensate for unavoidable losses to ensure the decisions are clearly understood and can be easily repeated file -by -file; • A centralized database that all TRCA staff can use to calculate compensation requirements and implementation costs, and track and report on project status; • Restoration project cost estimates for implementing different cover types (wetland, forest, meadow, etc.) that detail required components to ensure that project design and implementation meet a high standard whether completed by TRCA or external proponents and consultants; and • Agreement and Reporting templates (e.g., Restoration Site Selection Brief, Compensation Database) that record the same information for each compensation file. These tools enable as much consistency as possible between individual plan review files and restoration projects. However, it is unreasonable to expect 100% consistency as many different factors affect each file, including the mechanism for compensation: it may be internal and tied to the Conservation Authority (CA) permit, or external and through a Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) or Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) process. In all cases TRCA strives for consistency. Table 2, Funds Received and Consistency with TRCA Guideline, presents cash -in -lieu funds received by TRCA compared with funds requested in 2017-2020. This table shows that, over the last four years, TRCA successfully negotiated full cost recovery for restoration projects 96% of the time. Discrepancies are due to funds being reduced during negotiations with proponents and other agencies. These cases usually involve infrastructure and external regulatory agencies such as DFO. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 13 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report TABLE 2. FUNDS RECEIVED AND CONSISTENCY WITH TRCA GUIDELINE Funding (2017-2020) Consistency % Equal to Requested 96% Less than Requested 4% Total 100% Before the Guideline was developed, there was less emphasis on keeping restoration within a municipality or watershed where the compensation project occurred; under the Guideline, adherence to this principle has become more consistent. Of the funds received between 2017 and 2020, 93% of restoration projects were undertaken in the same municipality and 87% were in the same watershed. When looking at funds received in 2020 alone, 100% of restoration projects were implemented in the same municipality, and 83% were in the same watershed. Tables 3a and 3b compare where compensation projects occurred and restoration projects occurred. Sometimes the restoration site selection rationale suggests a location outside the impacted municipality or watershed; this is a decision agreed upon by the Project Review Team in consultation with the affected municipalities. For example, in 2017-2020 there were six restoration projects funded by compensation projects in Toronto: four of the restoration projects were implemented within Toronto; compensation funds from the Toronto Waterfront were reallocated (as agreed by TRCA, Toronto, and DFO) to a Waterfront restoration projects in Ajax; and one final impact in Toronto was allocated to a restoration project within the same watershed just north of the Toronto -Vaughan border. TABLE 3A. COMPARISON OF COMPENSATION FUNDING SOURCES AND EXPENDITURES BY MUNICIPALITY (2017-2020) Municipality # of Where Municipality Where Compensation Project Occurred Restoration Restoration Occurred Projects Ajax Brampton Caledon Markham Pickering Richmond Toronto Vaughan Hill Ajax 3 2 1 6 Brampton 4 4 Caledon 5 5 Markham 3 3 Pickering 25 25 Richmond 2 2 Hill Toronto 5 5. Vaughan 1 3 4 # of Restoration 3 4 5 3 27 2 7 3 54 Projects Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 1 14 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report TABLE 3B. COMPARISON OF COMPENSATION FUNDING SOURCES AND EXPENDITURES BY WATERSHED (2017-2020) Watershed Average Distance (km) Maximum Distance (km) q of Where 3.1 Watershed Where Compensation Project Occurred Restoration Restoration Caledon 3.5 Projects Occurred 6.2 Don Duffins Etobicoke Humber Mimico Petticoat Rouge Waterfront Mississauga 1 Don 1 Duffins 27 5.2 Richmond Hill 4.7 5.2 1 28 Etobicoke Vaughan 1 6.0 Overall 3.7 30.4 1 2 Frenchman's 1 1 Bay Highland 1 1 Humber 10 1 11 Mimico 1 1 2 Petticoat 2 2 Rouge 4 1 5 Waterfront 1 1 # of Restoration 2 28 1 it 1 2 5 4 54 Projects Tables 4a and 4b provide additional information on the proximity of restoration compensation sites to losses across the jurisdiction. The average distance between an impact and restoration site within various municipalities between 1994-2020 was 3.7 km, and the maximum distance of 30.4 km resulted from a Toronto impact along the waterfront where restoration occurred elsewhere along the waterfront. When looking at the distance from impact to restoration within the watershed, the average distance is 4.4 km, and the maximum distance is that same 30.4 km. Comparing these numbers against future reporting will help to assess TRCXs ability to find restoration compensation sites near impacted areas. When pre -2017 information was entered into the Compensation Database, the average distances between impacts and restoration increased from the 2.61 km reported last year, which is another indication that sites selected in previous years were typically farther apart. TABLE 4A. RESTORATION PROJECT DISTANCE FROM COMPENSATION IMPACT BY MUNICIPALITY 1994-2020 Municipality Average Distance (km) Maximum Distance (km) Ajax 1.5 3.1 Brampton 1.8 11.1 Caledon 3.5 11.1 Markham 6.2 9.3 Mississauga 0.2 0.3 Pickering 1.6 5.2 Richmond Hill 4.7 5.2 Toronto 12.1 30.4 Vaughan 1.5 6.0 Overall 3.7 30.4 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 15 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report TABLE 4B. RESTORATION PROJECT DISTANCE FROM COMPENSATION IMPACT By WATERSHED 1994-2020 Watershed Average Distance (km) Maximum Distance (km) Carruthers 3.7 5.2 Don 3.0 9.6 Duffins 1.1 3.2 Etobicoke 3.0 11.1 Frenchman's Bay 3.6 4.6 Highland 1.8 4.7 Humber 2.2 11.1 Mimico 2.7 5.0 Petticoat 0.5 0.9 Rouge 5.2 9.3 Waterfront 21.5 30.4 Overall 4.4 30.4 Goal 5: Efficiency and Timeliness The Guideline directs that restoration should be achieved in a timely manner. This minimizes the time lag between the lost ecosystem functions and those that are provided by restoration implementation. Targets for time lag goals were set in the 2019 program summary report. • Time from receipt of cash -in -lieu funds to starting or initiating projects to be within 1 year; • Time from receipt of cash -in -lieu funds to project implementation to be within 2 years; and • Time from receipt of cash -in -lieu funds to project completion to be within 7 years. The tables below (Tables 5-7) indicate that TRCA has met these goals for 2017-2020, with a few exceptions. Negative numbers in the time lag column indicate that restoration (planning and/or implementation) began prior to receiving funds. This is common when projects are invoiced after implementation as per agreement. This also occurred in 2020 when TRCA allocated the ecosystem bank at the Toronto Islands to help offset impacts within Toronto related to the Ashbridge's Bay Landform Project. Time lags for years 4 onward represent estimates of future activities beyond 2020 and may be adjusted as restoration project implementation progresses. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 16 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report TABLE S. TIME INTERVAL BETWEEN RECEIVING FUNDS AND STARTING RESTORATION PROJECT Time Lag (Years) # of Projects % of Projects -10* -2 1 3% 6 15% -1 10 26% 0 17 44% 1 5 13% Grand Total 39 100% 100% * Negative time lag represents past activity where restoration completed before funds received. TABLE 6. TIME INTERVAL BETWEEN RECEIVING FUNDS AND RESTORATION PROJECT BEING IMPLEMENTED Time Lag (Years) # of Projects % of Projects 0 8 31% 1 12 46% 2 5 19% 3 1 4% Grand Total 26 100% 96% TABLE 7. TIME INTERVAL BETWEEN RECEIVING FUNDS AND COMPENSATION PROJECT FILE COMPLETION Time Lag (Years) # of Projects % of Projects 0 3 12% 1 7 27% 2 1 4% 5** 3 12% 6** 6 23% 7** 4 15% 8** 1 4% 14*** 1 4% Grand Total 26 100% 92% ** Greater than 4 -year time lag represents estimate of future activities beyond 2017-2020. ***10 years of monitoring and maintenance associated with Meadow restoration. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 17 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report Goal 6: Adaptability Undertaking an adaptable management strategy for compensation is important on a project and program basis. At the project level, being adaptable is important as there are often multiple stakeholders working toward complex solutions and no two projects are alike. As a result, it can be challenging to have a consistent one -solution approach to compensation. Adaptability is particularly important in urban restoration projects where there are multiple constraints that add uncertainty and threaten the projects' viability and longevity (e.g., invasive species, soil compaction, urban storm runoff, etc.). Post -implementation assessments and monitoring are essential to understand the trajectory of a restoration project and to adapt maintenance to ensure that the target ecosystem functions are maximized. At the program level, adaptation relates to understanding gaps, deficiencies, or inconsistencies in how compensation decisions are tracked and executed and making changes to ensure regulatory requirements are met in the best possible manner. Adaptation ensures that we integrate the lessons learned from working with the Guideline and Framework, so that the program can grow, become more robust and defensible, and achieve its goals. In 2020 TRCA worked to understand the gaps in existing systems. Restoration and Resource Management continues to work with the Finance and Information Technology & Records Management (ITRM) business units to further refine the Compensation Database, including the information it can store and report, and its connections to other internal databases. Mechanisms in the Guideline and the Framework that relate to adaptation include: • Annual summary reporting of the Ecosystem Compensation Program using metrics to assess performance and provide recommendations for adaptation where necessary; • Improved lines of communication to ensure decisions are reviewed and commented on by the appropriate staff on the Project Review Team in a timely manner; and • Post -construction assessments, monitoring, and maintenance to maximize project performance and minimize lag time between ecosystem functions lost through natural feature removal and those recovered through restoration. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the information presented above, the following sections outline key points with recommendations for the Ecosystem Compensation Program. Goal 1: No Net Loss Currently, compensation implementation specific only to TRCA projects is achieving an overall net gain of natural feature area. However, this must be viewed cautiously since the results in this summary relate only to compensation projects where TRCA has received cash -in -lieu funding. As stated in the Details section above, situations where losses occur that do not result in compensation are not reflected in this assessment. As previously noted, on-site restoration and compensation implemented by other agencies are also not included in this assessment. Although this summary does not reflect the complete picture of compensation, it does provide an understanding around TRCA best practices (i.e., is TRCA effectively implementing enough off-site compensation projects to match the required losses where compensation is applied?). Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 1 18 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report The net gain identified in the results was achieved through project efficiencies. In other words, funds remaining once restoration requirements were met were used to provide value-added restoration (i.e., more natural features) to existing projects. As noted earlier, there is currently an 11.1 ha deficit in meadow habitat and a 7.4 m deficit in stream habitat resulting from undervaluing the cost of restoration. To address the continued restoration requirement for meadow and stream habitat, TRCA will continue to implement restoration projects in an efficient manner and look for opportunities where surplus compensation funds can be leveraged with new funds to meet the required compensation targets. To better track restoration gains, TRCA will investigate methods of incorporating other business units currently implementing projects (including Forestry, Engineering Projects, Project Management Services, and Property and Risk Management) into the Compensation Databases so that all project activities implemented with compensation funds can be tracked accordingly. Tracking internal impacts and compensation would also add additional information to the ecosystem net balance equations. TRCA projects are typically self -compensating, but to be consistent with the Framework, it is recommended that a standard method of tracking internal project impacts and compensation be included in the Compensation Database. To capture the larger scope of losses and gains, the Compensation Database should be updated with losses that do not result in cash -in -lieu being received by TRCA. This would include scenarios where natural feature losses occur and funds are directed to an external municipal partner or consultant, or where no restoration results are expected/achieved. Additionally, Compensation Database updates could include scenarios where land base losses occur and on-site compensation is not enough to meet the loss, therefore losses are satisfied by transferring lands to a municipal partner or TRCA or funds are directed to a municipal partner. There are opportunities for integration with a new Infrastructure Planning and Development database called PARES (Planning Application Review and Enforcement System) that could assist with tracking losses in the future. Collaboration between TRCA departments will continue towards more integration of data to improve communication and reporting. Goal 2: Accountability Improved tracking and reporting through the Compensation Database have enabled greater accountability through more robust data summaries and improved lines of communication. In 2020 the Compensation Database User Manual was also updated to reflect the many changes to the database since 2017. The data show that the amount of funds TRCA receives from compensation continues to grow every year (Figure 4). This is also true of the funds spent to implement restoration projects. When comparing received funds with expenditures, the data show that despite TRCA's ability to implement more projects over the years, further increases in available resources (staff, materials, equipment, contractors) will also be needed to keep up with greater cash -in -lieu funds being received. Restoration and Resource Management will look to increase staff support in 2021 to assist with project implementation and program management. This will ensure that restoration projects are implemented in a timely manner and that the lag time between feature loss and restoration implementation is minimized. Goal 3: Transparency The Ecosystem Compensation Program has become even more transparent since the adoption of the Guideline and the implementation of the Framework. As the program develops, it will be important to determine if these mechanisms continue to demonstrate open and transparent lines of communication externally and internally. For Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 1 19 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report example, are we responding quickly enough to requests for information? Are we providing enough information to inform agencies and proponents about the allocation of compensation funds? Is there a clear understanding from proponents and agencies about what TRCA is doing with cash -in -lieu funds received? TRCA staff continue to make improvements in this area. Examples of this improved transparency are revisions to Restoration Site Selection Briefs to provide more detail on projects; revisions to the compensation agreements (currently under legal review) to reflect adherence to the Guideline; and collaborative meetings with municipalities and other stakeholders to ensure clear communication of TRCA's Ecosystem Compensation Program. Given its importance, transparency will continue to be assessed in future summary reports. Goal 4: Consistency TRCA strives to achieve restoration within the same municipality where the impact originated. Table 3a shows that although there are exceptions to this rule, as agreed upon by the Project Review Team and the municipality, TRCA successfully accomplishes this in most cases. When selecting a site for restoration, funds are directed primarily within the municipality first and within the watershed second. In some cases, for larger or more complicated projects, it may be necessary to obtain direction from the Program Review Team as well. Since the adoption of the Guideline and the Framework, consistency of data input to the Compensation Database has increased significantly, allowing for more useful information to be retrieved. Additionally, a more consistent approach to roles, responsibilities, and workflow has improved interdepartmental communication and overall understanding of policies and procedures related to compensation practices. Although each file is different and negotiations could alter the eventual outcome, staff should continue to strive for consistency when applying the Guideline principles. Goal 5: Efficiency and Timeliness The 2019 annual report on the Ecosystem Compensation Program set targets for efficiency and timeliness which TRCA will continue to strive for. The targets set last year are referenced below and were developed by looking at the then current time lags for the full set of restoration projects. The 2020 assessment (2017-2020) shows that TRCA achieved the follow percentages: • 100% of projects were started or initiated within 1 year of receipt of funds; this is up from 69% when reported in 2019; • 96% of projects were done active implementation within 2 years of receipt of funds; this is up from 49% when reported in 2019; and • 93% of projects were completed and funds fully spent (including monitoring and maintenance) within 7 years of receipt of funds; this is up from 70% when reported in 2019. These targets will be used in subsequent summary reports to measure ongoing performance and to highlight recommendations for future adaptation strategies. One recommendation for future action is to increase the availability of the resources needed to implement more compensation projects each year. These resources include staff, machinery, equipment, and contractors. In 2021, Restoration and Resource Management will seek to hire a new staff to assist with restoration projects that result from compensation projects. It is important to note that meadow restoration has a longer monitoring and maintenance phase and will not conform to the third goal for having funds Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 1 20 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report spent in 7 years. Some projects may also get stalled due to delays in securing restoration project permitting and partner agreements. Sometimes this is beyond the control of the project manager, however, new efficiencies may be found by improving communication with regulatory agencies and stakeholders (e.g., yearly restoration project screening meetings with regulatory bodies). Goal 6: Adaptability Compensation implementation is complicated and can vary from file to file, so it can be a challenge to achieve a consistent approach with each proponent and/or regulatory agency. The Ecosystem Compensation Program needs to be adaptable to account for the complexities of each file and to ensure that the overall Ecosystem Compensation Program can adapt when significant changes are required. These instances may include but are not limited to the following: • New scientific understanding as it applies to ecosystem function and the impacts of natural feature losses; • Identifying specific deficiencies in the Ecosystem Compensation Program and taking actions for improvement; • Collaboration and data sharing with other regulatory agencies that inform process change needs; • Feedback from proponents and municipalities that can inform process and communication improvements; • Undertaking comparative analysis of other jurisdictions' approaches to compensation to inform best practices and program changes; and • Monitoring results that identify a need to change restoration practices. The factors above have been critical to the development of the Guideline and the Framework, and there has been significant adaptation in the past few years to improve the Ecosystem Compensation Program. TRCA will continue to assess performance, share information, acquire stakeholder feedback, and use updated science to adapt and minimize program deficiencies. Major adaptations that occurred during 2020 included: • Refinements to the financial process and flow of information; • Development of a standard compensation agreement template; • Collaboration and adjustment of year-end account procedures; • Data reporting alignment with existing reporting structures; and • Adjustments to staff roles and responsibilities regarding communication between departments and data entry into the Compensation Database. Future adaptations will be outlined, assessed, and reported on in subsequent compensation summary reporting. NEXT STEPS The items outlined here will direct the focus for Program improvements over the course of 2021. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 21 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report No Net Loss: To make sure that the restoration required to compensate for losses is held to a high standard, the restoration costs for typical habitat types have been updated to include the new 2020 full cost staff rates for fee for service works, as well as increases to construction costs, and recommended adaptations to design and implementation practices based on monitoring results and scientific research. A longer-term review of the Ecosystem Compensation Program will be needed to assess effectiveness of the no net loss principles as described in the Guideline. To help assess the net balance of compensation decisions, Compensation Database updates and integration across Divisions will be investigated. In addition, TRCA will work to standardize how internal projects (those that result in an impact and associated compensation) get tracked in the Compensation Database. Accountability: Staff will continue to improve the Compensation Database to ensure it captures information required for file review and reporting. It is important that the information is easily accessible to both the Project and Program Review Teams, as the annual Ecosystem Compensation Program summary report will depend on accurate outputs from the Compensation Database. To aid staff in data entry, a Compensation Database User Manual was produced in 2020 and subsequent training will occur throughout various TRCA divisions. Transparency: Transparency will continue to be improved in 2021 as old (pre -2017) information on losses and restoration are uploaded into the Compensation Database. This will allow for more fulsome reporting on compensation projects covering a longer period and ensure that all compensation funds are being addressed in a timely manner. Consistency: The Program Review Team will continue to meet and discuss items that require clarity or adaptation so that TRCA staff continue to implement compensation uniformly. Discussions will be held with other levels of government, including our municipal partners and other conservation authorities, to help ensure that compensation across southern Ontario is undertaken in a consistent manner while recognizing regional differences in development patterns and landscapes. Efficiency and Timeliness: With both the Guideline and the Framework in place, and with program reporting underway, it is necessary to ensure that restoration keeps pace with losses on the landscape by reducing the administration time lag associated with establishing new natural features and then allowing them to mature. 2020 has seen streamlining and improved understanding of the Guideline and Framework processes. In 2021 the plan to increase resources in TRCA's Restoration and Resource Management business units will improve capacity, reduce timelines (outside of external permit and approval delays, such as those required to implement restoration projects), and help to draw down funds currently allocated for restoration. Compensation Database updates to automate summary report generation in 2021 will also improve the efficiency and timeliness of the Program reporting next year. Increased access to ITRM resources will be required to support this. Adaptability: The Ecosystem Compensation Program will continue to be refined to meet the Framework goals and objectives. There are three principal areas that will continue to be investigated and addressed. First is the concept developed in the Guideline of applying basal area as a simple proxy for natural feature functions; this will be reviewed with external professionals to determine if the concept can be stronger. Second will be improvements to tracking land base losses that occur without compensation to represent natural heritage system losses more accurately. Land base loss tracking improvements will be sought for losses that result from Environmental Assessments, regional and municipal projects, as well as on-site compensation, so that losses and gains can be tracked more effectively and compared to local Greenland Acquisition and Securement Strategies, thereby capturing the net natural feature balance across TRCA's jurisdiction. Finally, incorporating property and asset management costs for lands dedicated to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 1 22 2020 Ecosystem Compensation Program Summary Report TRCA as part of a compensation project will be explored to ensure that TRCA is able to sustainably maintain those lands for the future. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 23 Toronto and Region www.trca.ca Conservation Authority RES.#B84/20 - VENDOR OF RECORD ARRANGEMENT FOR HERITAGE RESTORATION AT BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE Award of Request for Proposal (RFP) No.10033027 for a Vendor of Record (VOR) arrangement for heritage restoration work required at Black Creek Pioneer Village. Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Paul Ainslie THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) requires heritage restoration work for the preservation of heritage buildings at Black Creek Pioneer Village; AND WHEREAS TRCA solicited proposals through a publicly advertised process and evaluated the proposals based on the criteria outlined in this report; THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA staff be directed to establish a Vendor of Record arrangement with Action Buildworks, Adem's Restoration, B. A. Construction, Brooks Restoration, DJ McRae and J.D. Strachan for the supply of heritage restoration work for a period of three (3) years with the option to extend for two (2) additional years. THAT should the vendors not be able to supply heritage restoration goods and services for a particular project, staff be authorized to conduct a separate procurement process per TRCA's Procurement Policy; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to implement the contract, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA requires heritage restoration work for the preservation of heritage buildings at Black Creek Pioneer Village. By establishing a VOR arrangement for heritage restoration work, vendors are authorized to provide these goods and/or services for a defined period and with fixed pricing. Staff may contact a vendor on the list to provide carpentry, masonry, painting, roofing and/or stucco services with a value up to $25,000 per occurrence. Services above the $25,000 threshold are subject to further TRCA procurement policies. Vendors will be required to provide all resources required to service the divisional or program needs in accordance with applicable laws, codes, standards, terms and conditions of the VOR agreement. The VOR arrangement will be subject to annual review in order to confirm that the vendor(s) is/are providing an adequate level of service and to update any applicable insurance, certifications, or policies of the vendors. RATIONALE RFP documentation was posted on the public procurement website www.biddingo.com on August 511, 2020 and closed on August 21", 2020. Five (5) addendums were issued to respond to questions received. A total of sixty-one (61) firms downloaded the documents and fifteen (15) proposals were received from the following vendor(s): • 818185 Ontario Inc. • AAA Roofmasters Ltd. Action Buildworks Ltd. Adem's Restoration B.A. Construction and Restoration Inc. • Brook Restoration Ltd. • Clifford Restoration Ltd. • COSGAR GC.PM • DJ McRae Contractors Ltd. • G.V.Miller Custom Contracting • JD Strachan Construction Ltd. • Limen Group Const. Ltd. • MASI Group Inc. • Northeast Roofing Inc. • RAINFORCES LTD. An Evaluation Committee comprised of staff from Procurement Services, Black Creek Pioneer Village and Business Services reviewed the proposals. The criteria used to evaluate and select the recommended Proponents included the following: Criteria Weight Minimum Score Proponent Information 15 Key Personnel 15 Experience and Qualifications 30 Health and Safety 15 Sub -Total 75 30 Pricing 25 10 Sub -Total 25 10 otal Points 100 40 Proponents had the option to provide pricing for one or more of the five (5) categories: carpentry, masonry, painting, roofing and/or stucco services. The four (4) highest scoring Proponents for each service category are recommended for contract award. Through the evaluation process it was determined that Action Buildworks, Adem's Restoration, B. A. Construction, Brooks Restoration, DJ McRae and J.D. Strachan are the highest scoring vendors meeting the qualifications and requirements set out in the RFP, as follows (In alphabetical order): Carpentry: Adem's Restoration B.A. Construction DJ McRae J.D. Strachan Masonry: Adem's Restoration B.A. Construction DJ McRae J.D. Strachan Painting: Adem's Restoration B.A. Construction Brooks Restoration DJ McRae Roofing: Action Buildworks Adem's Restoration B.A. Construction Brooks Restoration Stucco: Adem's Restoration B.A. Construction Brooks Restoration J.D. Strachan Therefore, staff recommend the award of contract No. 10033027 to the aforementioned Proponents. Proponent's scores and staff analysis of the evaluation results can be provided in an in -camera presentation, upon request. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategic priority set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 7 — Build partnerships and new business models Strategy 6 — Tell the story of the Toronto region FINANCIAL DETAILS Based upon a review of previous work completed for 2018 — 2020, the anticipated costs for the requested goods and/or services are approximately $400,000 in total over the next 3 years. An increase or decrease in workload will have an impact on the value of this contract. All vendors on the VOR list understand both the potential cost and resource implications associated with changes in workload. The goods and/or services will be provided on an "as required" basis with no minimum hours guaranteed. Vendor(s) may increase hourly rates annually, to a maximum of the preceding year's Ontario's Consumer Price Index as published by Statistics Canada. Funds for the contract are identified in the 2021- Black Creek Pioneer Village capital budget. Report prepared by: Julia Del Monte, extension 6418 Emails: julia.delmontee-trca.ca For Information contact: Julia Del Monte, extension 6418 Emails: julia.delmonte(&trca.ca Date: January 4, 2021 RES.#B85/20 - REQUEST FOR TENDER FOR SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF VARIOUS AGGREGATE FOR THE ASHBRIDGES BAY TREATMENT PLANT LANDFORM PROJECT Award of Request for Tender (RFT) No. 10035223 — Supply and Delivery of 30,600 tonnes of 100 - 700 mm Core Stone. Award of Request for Tender (RFT) No. 10035225 — Supply and Delivery of 35,300 tonnes of 4 - 6 tonne Armour Stone. Award of Request for Tender (RFT) No. 10035226 — Supply and Delivery of 9,200 tonnes of 3 - 5 tonne Armour Stone. Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Paul Ainslie THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is engaged in a project that requires the supply and delivery of various aggregate; AND WHEREAS TRCA solicited tenders through a publicly advertised process; THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT Request for Tender (RFT) No. 10035223 be awarded to Bot Construction Limited at a total cost not to exceed $1,059,066, plus applicable taxes, to be expended as authorized by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff; THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of $105,906 (10% of the project cost), plus applicable taxes, in excess of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary; THAT Request for Tender (RFT) No. 10035225 be awarded to CDR Young's Aggregates at a total cost not to exceed $2,995,205, plus applicable taxes, to be expended as authorized by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff; THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of $299,520 (10% of the project cost), plus applicable taxes, in excess of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary; THAT Request for Tender (RFT) No. 10035226 be awarded to Glenn Windrem Trucking at a total cost not to exceed $780,620, plus applicable taxes, to be expended as authorized by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff; THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of $78,062 (10% of the project cost), plus applicable taxes, in excess of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary; THAT should TRCA staff be unable to negotiate a contract with the above-mentioned Proponents, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with other Proponents that submitted quotations, beginning with the next lowest bid meeting TRCA specifications; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to implement the contract, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA, in partnership with the City of Toronto, has commenced construction of three shore - connected breakwaters and a headland -beach system as part of the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant (ABTP) Landform Project located on the north shore of Lake Ontario, in the City of Toronto. The Ashbridges Bay area has been the subject of several environmental assessments intended to identify a solution to local shoreline erosion and sediment deposition issues while considering approved planning initiatives and current uses in the project area. Erosion control for long-term shoreline stability and protection of existing facilities, as well as management of sediment from the Coatsworth Cut navigation channel were identified as critically important to the City of Toronto. An integrated approach was decided upon which included the development of detailed designs and construction of the ABTP Landform as a solution to the erosion and sediment control issues at Ashbridges Bay. Construction of the ABTP Landform, in accordance with the detailed designs, was authorized during the City Council meetings on April 16 and 17, 2019. At TRCA's Board of Directors meeting #4/19, held on April 26, 2019, RES.#A56/19 provided staff with direction to negotiate and enter into and execute one or more service agreements with the City of Toronto to construct the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Landform. The final agreement for construction of the ABTP Landform Project was executed on December 23, 2019 and construction activities officially began on January 13, 2020. A comprehensive implementation phasing plan for the landform was prepared as part of detailed design. Construction of the Landform will be split into three components and three corresponding cells, which will be constructed from west to east. Each phase involves the construction of a confinement berm to isolate the fill area from the lake, the filling of the cell, the construction of a protective headland -beach system, and submerged shoal habitat features. There is also a central and east breakwater, which together, provides a long-term solution to address the sedimentation issue within the Coatsworth Cut navigation channel which TRCA currently maintains through a $250,000 per year dredging program. Given the scope of the Landform Project, an estimated five to six-year phased approach is required to construct the works commencing in 2020. The phases are as follows and are depicted in Figure 1: • Phase 1 — Construction of the Cell 1 confinement berm, filling of Cell 1, and construction of the headland -beach system and submerged shoals associated with Cell 1 • Phase 2 — Construction of Cell 2 confinement berm, filling of Cell 2, construction of headland -beach system and submerged shoals associated with Cell 2 • Phase 3 — Construction of the Cell 3 confinement berm, filling of Cell 3, and armourstone and rip -rap placement • Phase 4 and 5 — Construction of Eastern and Central Breakwater, and shoal construction Approval to award Contract #10020798 for supply and delivery of material required for the construction of the Cell 1 confinement berm was recommended for approval at Executive Committee meeting #4/19 held on Friday May 03, 2019 and was approved at the Board of Directors meeting #5/19 held on Friday May 24, 2019. Construction of the Cell 1 confinement berm commenced on February 5, 2020 and was completed on June 19, 2020. Approval to award Contract #10033378 for supply and delivery of material required for construction of the Cell 2 confinement berm was recommended for approval at Executive Committee meeting #4/20 held on June 12, 2020 and was approved at the Board of Directors meeting #5/20 held on June 26, 2020. Construction of the Cell 2 confinement berm commenced on June 22, 2020 and was completed on October 28, 2020. RATIONALE Both Cell 1 and Cell 2 confinement berms have been completed and staff are preparing to begin construction of two of the four headlands. These headlands are designed to provide protection to the confinement berms, and retain cobble beach material which will be procured through a separate contract in the future. A Request for Tender for supply and delivery of materials required to build the West and Central West headlands was publicly advertised on the public procurement website www.biddingo.com on November 9, 2020. An optional meeting and site tour was held on November 18, 2020. The RFT closed on November 30, 2020. Two addendums were issued to respond to questions received. A total of 25 firms downloaded the documents and submissions were received from the following Proponent(s): • Bot Construction Limited • CDR Young's Aggregates • Dufferin Aggregates • Glenn Windrem Trucking • Miller Paving Limited The Procurement Opening Committee opened the Tenders on November 30, 2020 with the following results: Contract #10035223 — Supply and Delivery of 30,600 tonnes of 100-700 mm Core Stone Proponent Fee (Plus HST) Bot Construction Limited $1,059,066 Dufferin Aggregates $1,071,612 Glenn Windrem Trucking $1,243,890 Miller Paving Limited $1,131,588 Staff reviewed the bid received from Bot Construction Limited against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and meets the requirements as outlined in the RFT documents. Therefore, it is recommended that contract No. 10035223 be awarded to Bot Construction Limited at a total cost not to exceed $1,059,066, plus 10% contingency, plus applicable taxes, it being the lowest bid meeting TRCA's specifications. Contract #10035225 — Supply and Delivery of 35,300 tonnes of 4 - 6 tonne Armour Stone Proponent Fee (Plus HST) CDR Young's Aggregates $2,995,205 Staff reviewed the bid received from CDR Young's Aggregates against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and meets the requirements as outlined in the RFT documents. Therefore, it is recommended that contract No. 10035225 be awarded to CDR Young's Aggregates at a total cost not to exceed $2,995,205, plus 10% contingency, plus applicable taxes, it being the lowest bid meeting TRCA's specifications. Contract #10035226 — Supply and Delivery of 9,200 tonnes of 3 - 5 tonne Armour Stone Proponent Fee (Plus HST) Glenn Windrem Trucking $780,620 Staff reviewed the bid received from Glenn Windrem Trucking against its own cost estimate and has determined that the bid is of reasonable value and meets the requirements as outlined in the RFT documents. Therefore, it is recommended that contract No. 10035223 be awarded to Glenn Windrem Trucking at a total cost not to exceed $780,620, plus 10% contingency, plus applicable taxes, it being the lowest bid meeting TRCA's specifications. One bid was received for Contracts #10035225 and #10035226 and based on past vendor feedback it is mostly likely due to the limited number of available armour stone suppliers that can meet the requirements of these contracts, both in quantity of stone required, as well as the delivery rates expected during the term of the contracts. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategic priorities set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 2 — Manage our regional water resources for current and future generations Strategy 7 — Build partnerships and new business models Strategy 12 — Facilitate a region -wide approach to sustainability The supply of materials outlined in this report will provide long term shoreline erosion control to existing City of Toronto facilities while providing a landbase for new City of Toronto infrastructure including a High Rate Treatment Plant as identified in the Don River and Central Waterfront EA. Further, by collaborating with the City of Toronto on this large-scale waterfront construction initiative, which aligns closely with both City of Toronto and TRCA priorities, we are strengthening our municipal relationships and demonstrating our ability to deliver on these types of projects. The implementation of this project involves the integration of three Class EAs (two City of Toronto led and one TRCA led) which will allow for a new High Rate Treatment Plant allowing the City of Toronto to better address the treatment demands of a growing city, provide long term erosion control to the Toronto shoreline and waterfront infrastructure, and address the sedimentation issue within the Coatsworth Cut navigation channel which TRCA currently maintains through a $250,000 per year dredging program. FINANCIAL DETAILS The estimated project cost for construction of the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Landform Project is $96.0 million net of all applicable taxes ($97.7 million net of HST recoveries). Funds to support these contracts will be recovered through the service agreement with the City of Toronto and tracked under account code 183-02. Report prepared by: Alex Barber, extension 5388 and Jet Taylor, extension 5526 Emails: alex.barber(a)trca.ca and jet.taylorC&trca.ca For Information contact: Jet Taylor, extension 5526 Email: jet.taylor(a)trca.ca Date: December 1, 2020 RES.#B86/20 - REQUEST FOR PERMANENT EASEMENT (CITY OF RICHMOND HILL) Receipt of a request from the City of Richmond Hill for a permanent easement of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority -owned lands located on southside of Maple Grove Avenue of street and west of Yonge Street, in the City of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, required for the reconstruction of Maple Grove Avenue, Humber River watershed (CFN 64050). Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Linda Jackson THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Richmond Hill for a permanent easement on TRCA-owned lands located on southside of Maple Grove Avenue and west of Yonge Street, in the City of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, required for the reconstruction of Maple Grove Avenue, Humber River watershed; AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Richmond Hill in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing 0.04 hectares (0.1 acres), more or less, of vacant land, required for the reconstruction of Maple Grove Avenue, said land being Part of Lot 87, Registered Plan 202 designated as Part 1 on draft plan of survey by J.D. Barnes Limited, Reference No. 17-21-101-04-F, dated October 27, 2020, and; Part of Lots 96 and 97, Registered Plan 202, designated as Parts 1-3 inclusively on draft plan of survey by J.D. Barnes Limited, Reference No. 17-21- 101-04-G, dated October 15, 2020 in the City of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, be conveyed to the City of Richmond Hill; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00 and that the Regional Municipality of York agree to pay all legal, survey and other costs; THAT the City of Richmond Hill is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from this conveyance or the carrying out of construction; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigation measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of City of Richmond Hill; THAT a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval, in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines at the expense of City of Richmond Hill; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, be obtained by City of Richmond Hill prior to the commencement of construction; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction, including obtaining any necessary approvals and the signing and execution of documents. AMENDMENT TO THE MAIN MOTION Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Gordon Highet THAT in the fourth paragraph the words "the Regional Municipality of York" be substituted with "the City of Richmond Hill". CARRIED THE AMENDMENT WAS: CARRIED THE RESULTANT MOTION READS AS FOLLOW: THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Richmond Hill for a permanent easement on TRCA-owned lands located on southside of Maple Grove Avenue and west of Yonge Street, in the City of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, required for the reconstruction of Maple Grove Avenue, Humber River watershed; AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with the City of Richmond Hill in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing 0.04 hectares (0.1 acres), more or less, of vacant land, required for the reconstruction of Maple Grove Avenue, said land being Part of Lot 87, Registered Plan 202 designated as Part 1 on draft plan of survey by J.D. Barnes Limited, Reference No. 17-21-101-04-F, dated October 27, 2020, and; Part of Lots 96 and 97, Registered Plan 202, designated as Parts 1-3 inclusively on draft plan of survey by J.D. Barnes Limited, Reference No. 17-21- 101-04-G, dated October 15, 2020 in the City of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, be conveyed to the City of Richmond Hill; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00 and that the City of Richmond Hill agree to pay all legal, survey and other costs; THAT the City of Richmond Hill is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from this conveyance or the carrying out of construction; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigation measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of City of Richmond Hill; THAT a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval, in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines at the expense of City of Richmond Hill; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, be obtained by City of Richmond Hill prior to the commencement of construction; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction, including obtaining any necessary approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Richmond Hill has requested permanent easement across TRCA-owned lands, located on the southside Maple Grove Avenue and west of Yonge Street, in the City of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, required for Reconstruction of Maple Grove Avenue. The subject TRCA-owned lands were acquired from Clifford A. Meadows, on November 21, 1967 under the Water Control for Humber River Flood Plain Lands Project and Karen Marie Bostlund, on January 16, 1981 under Interim Water and Related Land Management Project 1979-1981. Attachment 1 is a sketch illustrating the location of the subject lands. Attachment 2 is an orthophoto illustrating the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The City of Richmond Hill has conveyed lands to TRCA over the years for nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that TRCA lands required for Reconstruction of Maple Grove Avenue be conveyed for a nominal consideration of $2.00. Plantings All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan will be prepared as part of the permit application submission. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategy set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 4 — Create complete communities that integrate nature and the built environment FINANCIAL DETAILS The City of Richmond Hill has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by: Edlyn Wong, extension 5711 Emails: edlyn.wong(aDtrca.ca For Information contact: Edlyn Wong, extension 5711, Daniel Byskal, extension 6452 Emails: edlyn.wong(cDtrca.ca, daniel.bvskal(a)trca.ca Date: November 18, 2020 Attachments: 2 Attachment 1: Site Plan Attachment 2: Orthophoto 4ttachment 1: Site Plan \erm"n�ent smnt �ern\anent Eat mLent N ® eftTorontoand Region Conservation SITE puRNAM Authority YORK T PEEL \�Yry•\J TORONTO �•xe omm�o RES.#B88/20 - CONVEYANCE OF LAND AND PERMANENT EASEMENT (REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK) Receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of York, for a conveyance and permanent easements of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority owned lands located along Rutherford Road from west of Keele to Ilan Ramon Blvd (east of Bathurst), in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, required for Rutherford Road widening, Don River watershed (CFN 64051). Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Paul Ainslie THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of York for a conveyance of land and permanent easement of TRCA-owned lands located along Rutherford Road from west of Keele Avenue to Ilan Ramon Boulevard (east of Bathurst), in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, required for Rutherford Road widening, Don River watershed; AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with Regional Municipality of York in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA-owned lands containing 0.16 hectares (0.39 acres), more or less, of vacant land, required for Rutherford Road widening, being Part of Lot 15, Concession 2, designated as Parts 17, 20, 23-25 on Plan 65R-38173; Part of Block 110, Plan 65M-3917 designated as Part 8 on 65R-38174; Part of Block 212, Plan 65M-4004 designated as Part 33 on 65R-38236; Part of Block 41, Plan 65M-4486 designated as Parts 1, 3, and 4 on Plan 65R-38267 and; Part of Block 54, Plan 65M-4486 designated as Part 5 on 65R-38267, be conveyed to the Regional Municipality of York; THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.22 hectares (0.54 acres), more or less, of vacant land, required for Rutherford Road widening, being Part of Lot 15, Concession 2, designated as Parts 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22 and 37 on Plan 65R-38173; Part of Block 110, Plan 65M-3917 designated as Parts 6, 7 and 9 on 65R- 38174; Part of Block 212, 65M-4004 designated as Part 22 on 65R-38236; Part of Block 41, Plan 65M-4486 designated as Part 2 on Plan 65R-38267; Part of the West'/4 of Lot 16 Concession 4, designated as Parts 31, 32 on Plan 65R-37129, be conveyed to the Regional Municipality of York; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00 and that the Regional Municipality of York agree to pay all legal, survey and other costs; THAT the Regional Municipality of York is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from this conveyance or the carrying out of construction; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigation measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of Regional Municipality of York; THAT a landscape plan be prepared for TRCA staff review and approval, in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines at the expense of Regional Municipality of York; THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, be obtained by Regional Municipality of York prior to the commencement of construction, if required; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction, including obtaining any necessary approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Regional Municipality of York has requested a land conveyance and a permanent easement across TRCA-owned lands required for the widening of Rutherford Road. The subject TRCA-owned lands were acquired from Margaret Helen Emily Danyer on August 31, 1999 under the Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1996-2000, Woodvalley Developments Inc. on January 31, 2007 and Nine -Ten West Ltd. on August 17, 2007 under Greenlands Acquisition Project 2006-2010, Teefy Developments Ltd. on November 2, 2015 under Greenlands Acquisition Project 2011-2015, and Nine -Ten West Ltd. on June 30, 2016 under Greenlands Acquisition Project 2016-2020. Attachments 1-3 are sketches illustrating the location of the subject lands. Attachments 4-6 are orthophotos illustrating the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE The Regional Municipality of York has conveyed lands to TRCA over the years for nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that land conveyance of TRCA lands required for Rutherford Road Widening, be conveyed for a nominal consideration of $2.00. Plantings All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan will be prepared as part of the permit application submission. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategy set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 4 — Create complete communities that integrate nature and the built environment FINANCIAL DETAILS The Regional Municipality of York has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by: Edlyn Wong, extension 5711 Emails: edlyn.wong(a)trca.ca For Information contact: Edlyn Wong, extension 5711, Daniel Byskal, extension 6452 Emails: edlyn.wongCa)trca.ca, daniel.byskal(a)trca.ca Date: November 17, 2020 Attachments: 6 Attachment 1: Site Plan Attachment 2: Site Plan Attachment 3: Site Plan Attachment 4: Orthophoto Attachment 5: Orthophoto Attachment 6: Orthophoto Attachment 1: Site Plan c 0 _° m w LARGS GATE m N �c Permanent /Easement �pRp RO TESMA WAY West Don River TorontoandRegion Conservation YORK OU HAM Authority SITE PEEL t TORONTO �•xe omm�o Attachment 2: Site Plan �JO R E cRt 0 Am �' N� 4 pA v nvey n RujN�R�oRD RD W a W O C C Z T T A I w � J 2 a NI o: 0 c Toronto and Region ® Conservation YORK OU HAM Authority SITE T PEEL \�Yry•\J TORONTO �•xe omm�o Attachment 3: Site Plan o MPRCSAN�te�vo 0 $ yZ m i a 0 Perma nt mEasem Brit d I Conveyance o Permanent W Easement le Geek GafNil RV�N onveyance 0 2 f� RWpO O N O Toronto and Region Conservation YORK DURHAM Authority SITE T PEEL \�Yry•\J TORONTO �•xe omm�o A z -.,�. '—. r ✓ _wF IV +4 t R 4 lopr 0000 It y. mss, RES4689/20 - MOTION TO REFER Moved by: Jack Heath Seconded by: Linda Jackson THAT item 7.7 — Request for Disposal of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Owned Land be referred to the January 29, 2021 meeting of the Board of Directors. CARRIED RE: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY OWNED LAND Former Tompion Limited Property, City of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, Rouge River Watershed (CFN 61935) KEYISSUE Update on a request from Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc., for the conveyance of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) owned lands located north of Steeles Avenue East and west of Ninth Line, in the City of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, Rouge River watershed. RECOMMENDATION THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS at Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Board of Directors meeting held on November 29, 2019, it was resolved to enter into an agreement whereby TRCA is to convey 1.13 hectares (2.78 acres) of the former Tompion Limited lands to Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc. anc acquire 20.92 hectares (51.7 acres) of lands owned by Bluecrown Holdings Limited in close proximately to Albion Hills Conservation Area (AHCA), with Remington to pay TRCA the difference in market value, consideration of $4,282,000, which would be invested in TRCA projects in the Regional Municipality of York within the Rouge River watershed as well as all legal, survey and other costs (Res.#A219/19); AND WHEREAS the transfer of the majority of the 16.5 hectares of former Tompion Limited lands including the main Rouge River Valley and lands west to Ninth Line to Parks Canada for the Rouge National Urban Park and Regional Municipality of York for road widenings is completed; AND WHEREAS the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, the Regional Municipality of York and the City of Markham were requested to concur with the exchange of lands and allow TRCA to retain the net proceeds from the land exchange in accordance with an agreement dated December 12, 2002; AND WHEREAS developments in the waiving of repayment process have led to changes in the negotiation that are not represented by RES #A219/19; AND WHEREAS TRCA staff recommend that a sale of the former Tompion Limited lands would be in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act; THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA convey 1.13 hectares (2.78 acres), the former Tompion Limited lands, to Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc. for consideration of $5,232,000 as well as all legal, survey and other costs to be paid by Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc.; THAT TRCA request that, in the alternative to the requirement to repay proceeds pursuant to the original acquisition agreement dated December 12, 2002, the Regional Municipality of York and the City of Markham waive the requirement for repayment and allow TRCA to retain the net proceeds of the sale for TRCA related works within their respective jurisdictions, and that the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry waive repayment for acquisitions within the jurisdictions of the Municipality of York and City of Markham; THAT the firm Gardner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid by Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc.; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction, including obtaining any necessary approvals and the signing and execution of documents. BACKGROUND This request was brought to the attention of the Board of Directors at its meeting #10/19, held on November 19, 2019, where Resolution #A219/19 was adopted in part as follows: WHEREAS at Authority Meeting #7/18 held on September 28, 2018, Resolution #A 159/18, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff was requested to report back on lands north of Steeles Avenue E. west of Ninth Line and the main Rouge River; ...THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA enter into an exchange of land with Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc. and Bluecrown Holdings Limited, on the following basis... ...THAT TRCA receive consideration of $4,282,000.00 as well as all legal, survey and other costs to be paid by Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc. which would be invested in TRCA projects in York Region within the Rouge River watershed; ...THAT the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, the Regional Municipality of York and the City of Markham be requested to concur with the exchange of lands and allow TRCA to retain the net proceeds from the land exchange in accordance with an agreement dated December 12, 2002; ... Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc. (Remington) owns a 1 -hectare triangular parcel of land located on the north side of Steeles Avenue East, immediately west of and abutting the TRCA's former Tompion Limited lands as well as the lands north of the railway. Remington has approached TRCA inquiring if TRCA would be interested in selling the westerly 1.13 hectares (2.78 acres) of the former Tompion Limited lands as Remington was interested in incorporating said lands into the development they are proposing. Staff support this since the Remington parcel contains the only access to TRCA lands. The former Tompion Limited lands were acquired by TRCA from Tompion Limited on December 18, 2002. The property is 16.5 hectares, more or less, in size and is traversed by the main Rouge River. The original purchase was funded one-third by City of Markham, one-third by the Regional Municipality of York and one-third by Ministry of Natural Resources through their Ecological Land Acquisition Program. At the time of the Tompion Limited lands acquisition, TRCA entered into two agreements. The first was an option agreement with the Regional Municipality of York for the following portions of the property: a) Land required for the Markham By -Pass including any portions required for road, rail and water crossings as determined in accordance with any Environmental Assessment; b) 8 meters along the east limit of the property with such additional widths at road, rail and water crossings and grade separations and any other locations that require additional physical structure or grading, along the east limit; c) 8 meters along the south limit of the property with such additional widths at road, rail and water crossings and grade separations and any other locations that require additional physical structure or grading, along the south limit. Staff have completed the Regional Municipality of York's requests in conveying lands for the Steeles Avenue E and Ninth Line road widenings. The second agreement was a five -party agreement between City of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), Rouge Park Alliance (the Rouge Park Alliance was dissolved effective July 31, 2012) and TRCA. A clause in this agreement provided that TRCA may dispose of the following part of the property: a) referred to in the Option Agreement to the Region; b) west of 30 metres from the top of the bank on the west side of the Rouge River, provided the proceeds, after deducting TRCA' s reasonable costs, are paid equally to MNR, Markham and the Region. TRCA staff approached the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF), Regional Municipality of York and the City of Markham to discuss whether they would waive the requirement for re -payment of the net proceeds. In the initial discussions with Regional Municipality of York and City of Markham officials, they had indicated they would look favourably on waiving the requirement if the difference in market value was invested in TRCA projects nearby subject to receiving Board direction. Formal letters were sent to staff of the Regional Municipality of York, City of Markham and MNRF requesting to concur with the exchange of lands and resolve to allow TRCA to retain the net proceeds from the land sale in accordance with an agreement dated December 12, 2002. While no formal determination has been made by any party, during our discussions, York staff indicated that they will require TRCA repay its third, with a possibility TRCA will have access to the funds through regular budgetary processes. City of Markham staff suggested that TRCA repay the third and the City hold the funds for TRCA projects that will require the City's approval, while the Province through MNRF has stated they are awaiting the Region's and City's position before deciding on the request to waive the one third repayment. Once determinations have been made, staff will work with all parties to ensure TRCA obligations are fulfilled. Further developments in the waiving of repayment process has led to changes in the negotiation that are not represented by RES #A219/19. Regional Municipality of York and City of Markham staff have indicated that they will not support a land swap as the Bluecrown Holdings Limited as the lands to be acquired are outside of York Region. Based on the original appraisal, staff have negotiated the purchase of these lands, separately from the sale of the Tompion Limited lands. The acquisition of the Bluecrown Holdings Limited lands is now proposed to be a separate transaction, rather than tied to a land swap. Through the repayment waiver discussions with Regional Municipality of York and City of Markham staff, a discussion on the appraised value of the Tompion Limited lands was held which led to both Regional Municipality of York and TRCA commissioning an additional appraisal each. Through multiple meetings with staff and the proponent regarding the value of the buffer lands, an additional $250,000 was negotiated bringing the compensation for the Tompion Limited lands from $4,982,000 to $5,232,000. Attachments 1-2 are sketch and orthophoto illustrating the location of the former Tompion lands. RATIONALE When TRCA originally acquired the subject the Tompion lands, it was contemplated that TRCA may consider disposing of the non -ecologically significant westerly portion of the site sometime in the future. The three external vested parties (Regional Municipality of York, City of Markham and MNRF) are aware of the land disposal and have made no objections. As per section 4.5.3 of the Conservation Authorities Policy and Procedure Manual (Policies and Procedures for the Disposition of Conservation Authority Property) this disposal did not follow an open process with public notification as the property is landlocked or not separately viable and is being sold to the adjacent owner. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategies set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 3 — Rethink greenspace to maximize its value Strategy 7 — Build partnerships and new business models Strategy 12 — Facilitate a region -wide approach to sustainability FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds related to the negotiation for the sale of the Tompion Limited lands will be deducted from the proceeds of the sale, with TRCA holding the funds until the repayment waiver has been resolved with Regional Municipality of York, City of Markham and MNRF officials DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The following work will be completed • Execute APSs with Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc. • Close on transaction. • Resolve waiving of one third repayment to York Region, City of Markham, and Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Report prepared by: Brandon Hester, extension 5767, Daniel Byskal, extension 6452 Emails: Brandon. hester(a.trca.ca, Daniel.byskal(ciltrca.ca For Information contact: Brandon Hester, extension 5767, Daniel Byskal, extension 6452 Emails: Brandon. hester(a)trca.ca, Daniel.byskal(a)trca.ca Date: December 1, 2020 Attachments: 2 Attachment 1: Site Plan - Former Tompion Lands Attachment 2: Orthophoto - Former Tompion Lands Hnaanmem is ane Tian - i-ormer i ompion Sanas Lands to be Conveyed to Proponent Legend Toronto and Region Conservation Authority a PEEL' "'.OW.. m rn Lands to be Conveyed to Proponent Legend Toronto and Region Conservation Authority a PEEL' "'.OW.. - Former Tomvion Lands. .4 1 " by A RES.#B90/20 - GREENSPACE ACQUISITION PROJECT 2021-2030 Update to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) acquisition of a partial taking from a property located east of Peel Regional Road 50 and south of Gibson Lake Road, in the Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, under the "Greenspace Acquisition Project for 2021-2030," Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River watershed (CFN 64362). Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Paul Ainslie THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS at Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Board of Directors meeting held on November 29, 2019, it was resolved to enter into an agreement whereby TRCA is to convey 1.13 hectares (2.78 acres) of the former Tompion Limited lands to Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc. anc acquire 20.92 hectares (51.7 acres) of lands owned by Bluecrown Holdings Limited in close proximately to Albion Hills Conservation Area (AHCA), with Remington to pay TRCA the difference in market value, consideration of $4,282,000 which would be invested in TRCA projects in Regional Municipality of York within the Rouge River watershed as well as all legal, survey and other costs (Res.#A219/19); AND WHEREAS the transfer of the majority of the 16.5 hectares of former Tompion Limited lands including the main Rouge River Valley and lands west to Ninth Line to Parks Canada for the Rouge National Urban Park and Regional Municipality of York for road widenings is completed; AND WHEREAS the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, the Regional Municipality of York and the City of Markham were requested to concur with the exchange of lands and allow TRCA to retain the net proceeds from the land exchange in accordance with an agreement dated December 12, 2002; AND WHEREAS developments in the waiving of repayment process have led to changes in the negotiation that are not represented by RES #A219/19; AND WHEREAS TRCA staff recommend that acquisition of ecologically sensitive Bluecrown Holdings Inc. land would be in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act; THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT 20.92 hectares (51.7 acres), more or less, of vacant land, located east of Peel Regional Road 50 and south of Gibson Lake Road, said land being Part of Lot 23 & 24, Concession 6 & 7, designated as Part 2 on Plan 43R- 39437, in the Town of Caledon, Regional Bluecrown Holdings Limited; THAT the purchase price be $700,000; Municipality of Peel, be purchased from THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm Gardiner Roberts LLP, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid by Bluecrown Holdings Limited; AND FURTHER THAT once Ministerial approval of the Greenspace Acquisition Project 2021-2030 is received, authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction, including obtaining any necessary approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A28/20 at Board of Directors Meeting #3/20, held on April 24, 2020, approved the Greenspace Acquisition Project for 2021-2030. This request was brought to the attention of the Board of Directors at its meeting #10/19, held on November 29, 2019, where Resolution #A219/19 was adopted in part as follows: WHEREAS at Authority Meeting #7118 held on September 28, 2018, Resolution #A 159118, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff was requested to report back on lands north of Steeles Avenue E. west of Ninth Line and the main Rouge River,• ...THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA enter into an exchange of land with Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc. and Bluecrown Holdings Limited, on the following basis... ...THAT TRCA receive consideration of $4,282,000.00 as well as all legal, survey and other costs to be paid by Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc. which would be invested in TRCA projects in York Region within the Rouge River watershed; ...THAT the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, the Regional Municipality of York and the City of Markham be requested to concur with the exchange of lands and allow TRCA to retain the net proceeds from the land exchange in accordance with an agreement dated December 12, 2002; ... At TRCA's Board of Directors meeting held on November 29, 2019, it was resolved to enter into an agreement whereby TRCA is to convey 1.13 hectares (2.78 acres) of the former Tompion Limited lands to Remington (Parkview) Lands Inc. and acquire 20.92 hectares (51.7 acres) of lands owned by Bluecrown Holdings Limited in close proximately to Albion Hills Conservation Area (AHCA), with Remington to pay TRCA the difference in market value, consideration of $4,282,000 which would be invested in TRCA projects in Regional Municipality of York within the Rouge River watershed as well as all legal, survey and other costs (Res.#A219/19). Further developments in the waiving of repayment process has led to changes in the negotiation that are not represented by RES #A219/19. Regional Municipality of York and City of Markham staff have indicated that they will not support a land swap as the Bluecrown Holdings Limited as the land are outside of York Region. Based on the original appraisal, staff have negotiated the purchase of these lands, separately from the sale of the Tompion Limited lands. The acquisition of the Bluecrown Holdings Limited lands is now proposed to be a separate transaction, rather than tied to a land swap. Negotiations have been conducted with Randy Peddigrew, Senior Vice President Land Development for Remington Group Inc. representing Bluecrown Holdings Inc. Access to the subject lands will be achieved through adjacent TRCA property. Attachments 1 &2 is a sketch and orthophoto illustrating the location of the Bluecrown Holdings Limited lands. RATIONALE The Bluecrown Holdings Limited lands fall within TRCA's approved Greenspace Acquisition Project for 2021-2030. This property is designated as Oak Ridges Moraine Natural Core and it contains part of the Innis -Gibson Lakes Provincially Significant Candidate Life Science ANSI. The site currently contains a number of important habitat types, including forest, meadow, successional forest and wetlands. This diversity provides important habitat for a large number of flora and fauna. The site also has a cool -water fishery, consisting of streams and ponds. The property is bounded by Hwy 50 to the southwest, and a rail line to the east. Due to the large size and rural location, it provides exemplary habitat protection and restoration opportunities. This site is identified as Existing Natural Cover in the Target Terrestrial Natural Heritage System (TTNHS). Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategies set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 2 — Manage our regional water resources for current and future generations Strategy 3 — Rethink greenspace to maximize its value Strategy 4 — Create complete communities that integrate nature and the built environment Strategy 7 — Build partnerships and new business models Strategy 12 - Facilitate a region -wide approach to sustainability FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the acquisition of Bluecrown Holding Limited are available in the 940-74, Section 39 — Provincial Land Sale Reserve. Based on TRCA's preliminary review of the environmental criteria for lands that are eligible to receive a property tax exemption under the provincial Conservation Land Tax Incentive Program, it appears that a portion of the subject property should be eligible for a tax exemption. It is estimated that the taxable portion of the subject parcel of land will be $400-$600 per year. It is anticipated that the addition of this property will not significantly impact TRCA's maintenance costs at this location. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Upon approval, TRCA staff will execute an APS with Bluecrown Holdings Limited and close the transaction. Report prepared by: Report prepared by: Brandon Hester, extension 5767, Daniel Byskal, extension 6452 Emails: Brandon. hester(cDtrca.ca, Daniel.bvskalc@trca.ca For Information contact: Brandon Hester, extension 5767, Daniel Byskal, extension 6452 Emails: Brandon. hester(&trca.ca, Daniel.byskal(cDtrca.ca Date: December 1, 2020 Attachments: 2 Attachment 1: Site Plan - Bluecrown Holdings Limited Lands Attachment 2: Orthophoto - Bluecrown Holdings Limited Lands muecrown noiain s umitea Sanas Pronone t Lands:to b Conveyed to `TRCA Legend aft Toronto and Region Conservation Authority tPEEL "I.O .. RES.#B91/20 - DECLARATION OF SURPLUS LANDS AND PROPOSED APPROACH TO ADD VALUE PRIOR TO DISPOSITION IN SUPPORT OF WATERFRONT TRAIL AND SHORELINE RESTORATION OBJECTIVES Declaration of surplus lands, municipally known as 805 & 809 St. Martins Drive, City of Pickering, Regional municipality of Durham, Frenchman's Bay Watershed and proposed approach to work with the City of Pickering to add value to the property prior to disposition in support of joint City and TRCA Lake Ontario Waterfront Trail and shoreline restoration objectives (CFN 64096). Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Paul Ainslie THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff have identified two parcels of land, municipally known as 805 & 809 St. Martins Drive in the City of Pickering, to be surplus; AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA, in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to declare surplus lands that are not required for conservation and flood protection purposes; AND WHEREAS staff have identified an opportunity to potentially add value to the surplus lands prior to disposition through soft cost servicing and planning approvals; THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA deem the two parcels of land containing 0.21 hectares (0.52 acres), more or less of vacant lands, located east of St. Martins Drive, said lands being Lots 2, 3, & Part of Lot 1, Registered Plan 239; Pickering Being Part 8, on Plan 40R-11026 City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham (805 St. Martins Drive) and Lot 5 & Part of Lot 6, Registered Plan 239; City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham (809 St. Martins Drive) as surplus; AND FURTHER LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT staff proceed to investigate the highest value for disposition, required measures to achieve this enhanced value, and potential projects for furtherance of trail development within the Frenchman's Bay watershed and report back to the Executive Committee with a proposed approach and draft MOU with the City of Pickering once this is determined. CARRIED BACKGROUND 805 & 809 St. Martins Drive were acquired from Sandbury Building Corporation and 448404 Ontario Limited, on November 30, 1992 under the acquisition of the Sandbury Building Corporation Property/Frenchman's Bay Area Project. The Properties contain no ecologically significant features and were originally acquired for use as parkland. While nearby lands to the west have been used for parkland, these lands have not been, nor are there any plans to utilize the lands as parkland. Funds for Sandbury Building Corporation Property/Frenchman's Bay Area Project were provided by the Province of Ontario $451,295.27 (47.4%) and the City of Pickering $500,000 (52.6%). Attachment 1 is a sketch illustrating the location of the subject lands. Attachment 2 is an orthophoto illustrating the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE Declaring the subject lands surplus is in alignment with TRCA's Strategic Plan, specifically the goal of rethink greenspace to maximize its value, as well as build partnerships with member municipalities. The Properties are currently vacant lots of record, without servicing, located in an area where more intensive forms of house are being pursued by private sector interests. The surplus declaration and value enhancement work for these surplus lands will allow TRCA to further its mandate within the Frenchman's Bay watershed and will be beneficial to TRCA, City of Pickering, Region of Durham, the Province and the public at large. Prior to disposition, staff will confirm our preliminary findings of the value enhancement opportunity through a detailed business case/pro forma on how a soft cost redevelopment (e.g., obtain certain approvals without capital works) would increase the relative land value prior to disposition. Any costs associated to the redevelopment would be recuperated through the sale of the lands at a higher value. Staff will also be working with the City of Pickering to determine how any proceeds from the sale would be invested in priority projects via a MOU agreement that would be brought forward to TRCA Board of Directors in a future report. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategies set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan Strategy 3 — Rethink greenspace to maximize its value Strategy 7 — Build partnerships and new business models DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Once the lands are declared surplus, the following work is required to be conducted to support disposal and value enhancement of the lands: 1. Coordinate a detailed technical review by TRCA's staff. Appropriate terms and conditions are to be prepared by the TRCA/City staff, including potential impact or mitigation requirements relating to the lands; 2. Circulate information on the potential disposal to the local and regional municipalities; 3. Research and determine highest and best use for the lands based on market trends and land use compatibility considerations; 4. On consent of the CFOO, potentially develop the lands to maximize value based on pro forma findings (this will likely require retaining a development consultant, applying for Planning Act approvals, and obtaining required studies in support of applications; 5. Duly publicize disposal, including adequate newspaper publication in at least one local and one major Toronto region newspaper; 6. Taking into account COVID-19 requirements, conduct public open house information session that will be held in the vicinity of St. Martins Drive, Pickering, which could be coordinated with Planning Act requirements; 7. Report back to the Executive Committee with specific information relating to the transaction once staff have been able to determine a final recommendation with respect to the disposals and once the draft MOU with City of Pickering has been finalized. Report prepared by: Brandon Hester, extension 5767, Daniel Byskal, extension 6452 Emails: Brandon. Hester(cciltrca.ca, Daniel. ByskalCciltrca.ca For Information contact: Brandon Hester, extension 5767, Daniel Byskal, extension 6452 Emails: Brandon. hester(a)trca.ca, Daniel.byskal(a)trca.ca Date: December 1, 2020 Attachments: 2 Attachment 1: Site Plan Attachment 2: Orthophoto Legend aco TorontoandRegionO nservation Authority u P`��NU� 6R��N`NG , SITE Lake 00.dtl d m 74 Section II — Items for Executive Committee Action SNOW AND ICE MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR VARIOUS PROPERTIES Extension of Contract #10022070 for snow and ice management services for various Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) properties for the remainder of the 2020/2021 winter season. Moved by: Gordon Highet Seconded by: Jack Heath WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) solicited quotations through a competitive process in 2019 for snow and ice management services and awarded contract #10022070 to AAA Landscaping Company Limited, and Ivy Property Services Inc. for a total of $170,000, plus applicable taxes, plus 10% contingency; WHEREAS TRCA was satisfied with the services provided to date under the existing contracts and exercised its option to extend the contracts to Ivy Property Services Inc. and AAA Landscaping Company Ltd., for the period November 1, 2020 to January 15, 2021 for a value of $78,625; THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA staff be directed to further extend contract #10022070 for snow and ice management services for an additional 3 -month period, commencing January 16, 2021 and ending March 31, 2021, for an additional cost of $91,375, plus applicable taxes, for the total contract value not to exceed $340,000 plus applicable taxes; THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of $17,000, plus applicable taxes, in excess of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to implement the contract extension, including obtaining any necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND It is TRCA's continuing objective to ensure the health and safety of its staff and visitors as well as to mitigate injuries and major incidents. The provision of snow removal and ice management services will aid in reducing the hazards of winter road conditions, including the maintenance of safe parking lots, and facilitating the handling of emergencies by Emergency Medical Services. In October 2019, TRCA solicited quotations for snow and ice management services for various TRCA properties and awarded the contracts for a period of one (1) snow removal season 2019- 2020, at a total of $170,000, with the option to extend for one (1) additional snow removal season 2020-2021. The 2019-2020 period for snow removal and ice management services were provided by two separate contractors: Ivy Property Services Inc., and AAA Landscaping Company Ltd., and they serviced the following TRCA properties: • 18620 Centreville Creek Road, Caledon East • Bolton Camp - 13540 Caledon King Townline South, Caledon • 4673/4699/4685 Rutherford Road, Woodbridge • Black Creek Pioneer Village, Toronto - 1000 Murray Ross Parkway, Toronto • Albion Hills Conservation Park and Field Centre - 16500 Regional Road 50, Caledon • Boyd Centre - 9755 Canada Company Way, Woodbridge • Restoration Service Centre - 9741 Canada Company Way, Woodbridge • Swan Lake - 1229 Bethesda Side Road, Richmond Hill • Claireville Dam, 7625 Finch Avenue West, Brampton • G. Ross Lord Dam, 740 Finch Avenue West, Toronto With Additional On -Call Sites as follows: • Former Etobicoke Field Study Centre- 8180 Regional Road 50, Brampton • 2899 6th Concession, Uxbridge • 364 Old Finch Avenue, Toronto • 561 Glasgow Road, Caledon -Workshop • 4020 Westney Road North, Claremont - Workshop • 3 Reesor Road, Toronto • 83 Fishleigh Drive, Toronto • 461 & 463 Guildwood Parkway, Toronto The initial term of the agreement expired on March 31, 2020 and TRCA exercised its option to extend the contracts to Ivy Property Services Inc. and AAA Landscaping Company Ltd., for the period November 1, 2020 to January 15, 2021 for a value of $78,625. To complete the remainder of the 2020/ 2021 snow removal season until March 31, 2021, the further extension of the contract total would be an additional $91,375, revising the contract value for the two (2) periods to $340,000.00, plus applicable taxes. The contract extension for the period of November 1, 2020 — January 15, 2021 was approved by the Chief Financial and Operating Officer, under the 2019 Procurement Policy. Pursuant to the current 2019 Procurement Policy, the further extension of $91,375 and revised total contract value of $340,000 requires approval from the Executive Committee. RATIONALE Snow removal and ice management services at various TRCA properties should continue to be implemented throughout the 2020/2021 winter season to ensure the health and safety of TRCA staff and visitors, and to mitigate injuries and major incidents. TRCA staff are requesting approval to extend the current contracts for an additional 3 -month period. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategic priority set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 7 — Build partnerships and new business models Strategy 11 — Invest in our staff FINANCIAL DETAILS The total anticipated value of the extension is $91,375, plus applicable taxes, bringing the total of the contract to $340,000, plus applicable taxes, plus 10% contingency. Funds for snow plowing and salting/sanding services are identified within the divisional operating budgets. Funding for the residential rental portfolio is provided primarily through rental income, the remaining sites are funded through TRCA's municipal partners. Report prepared by: Lisa Valente, extension 5297 Emails: lisa.valente(cDtrca.ca For Information contact: Lori Colussi, extension 5303 Emails: lori.colussi(&trca.ca Date: December 14, 2020 Section III — Items for the Information of the Board 2020 NINE MONTH FINANCIAL REPORT (SEPTEMBER 30, 2020) Receipt of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) unaudited expenditures as of the end of the third quarter, September 301, 2020, for informational purposes. Moved by: Anthony Perruzza Seconded by: Linda Jackson IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the 2020 Financial Report for the nine-month period ended September 30, be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND As part of TRCA's financial governance procedures, staff are presenting the 2020 Nine Month Financial Report, which covers the period January 1, 2020 through to September 30, 2020. This report provides information on the spend rate of expenditures and recognition of revenue for the first nine months of 2020. For the purposes of this report, TRCA's four categories of revenue have been combined into one category titled 'Revenue' in the attached financial charts. This includes: • Authority Generated: Revenues raised through activities such as user fees, retail, rentals, program fees, event fees, and investment and interest income. • Government Funded: Municipal, Federal and Provincial grants and contract services. • Levies: Operating and Capital levies from municipal partners. • Reserves: Accumulated surplus which is intended to finance unforeseen costs related to ongoing operations or unfunded capital expenses for the organization. RATIONALE TRCA believes in transparency and accountability for its spending, revenue recognition and performance of service delivery objectives against approved budgets, for both the organization and for each project and program as an individual endeavor. This is further supported by TRCA's core values of integrity, collaboration, accountability, respect and excellence. TRCA recognizes that all projects and programs offered have cost implications and that all costs incurred are reasonable and practical in support of services. Transparency throughout the budget management process is achieved in part through the analysis and reporting on year-to- date revenues/expenses as compared to the current fiscal year budget. In order to improve the accuracy in reporting anticipated issues in expenditures, TRCA established a seasonal forecasting baseline using historical data from the past three years to estimate the seasonal variances within each program area. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategy set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 9 — Measure performance The operating and capital report by Service Area and underlying Program Areas are provided in Attachments 1 through 5. The attachments provide a summary analysis of expenditures and revenues to date and the variance explanations by Program Area. The variance threshold for both revenue and expenditures are +/- 10% and $500,000 from anticipated. Variances within these thresholds are deemed to be within the expected range. The capital report contains ten revenue variances and ten expenditure variances whereas the operating report contains five revenue variances and three expenditure variances. Attachment 5 explains each variance. A summary of the third quarter capital budget is shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 — Third Quarter Capital Budqet Revenue I Expenditure I Net $105,520,276 1 $82,064,654 1 $23,455,622 At year end, the net capital budget will approximate $0 as the excess of capital revenue reflects projects and services that have not yet been achieved, and as such will be deferred into the subsequent fiscal year. A summary of the third quarter operating budget is shown in Table 2 below. Table 2 — Third Quarter Operatin Bud et Revenue Ex enditure Net $31,228,948 $28,469,687 1$2,759,261 The goal for operating budget is to end the year in a positive position, considering the substantial impacts of COVID-19 on TRCA's operations. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff are constantly analyzing TRCA's operations in the context of COVID-19's impact on the organization's revenues and expenditures and potential for government funding to reduce the repercussions to staff complement, while ensuring that the safety of staff and the public is maintained. An analysis of the current and anticipated impacts of COVID-19 on TRCA's authority generated revenues is provided in the accompanying report titled 2020 COVID-19 Update — Financial Report. To mitigate the negative impacts to operations, TRCA staff will continue to monitor for new grant opportunities including potential funding opportunities through the Federal Government's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan. Staff have initiated communications with program officers to ensure that all available funding opportunities are explored. Report prepared by: Jenifer Moravek, extension 5659 Emails: jenifer.moravek(a)trca.ca For Information contact: Michael Tolensky, extension 5965 Emails: michael.tolenskv(cDtrca.ca Date: November 10, 2020 Attachment 1: Capital Budget Expenditures Attachment 2: Capital Budget Revenues Attachment 3: Operating Budget Expenditures Attachment 4: Operating Budget Revenues Attachment 5: Variance Explanations Attachment 1: Capital Budget Expenditures Watershed Planning and Reporting Climate Science Water Resource Science Erosion Management Flood Management Biodiversity Monitoring Ecosystem Management Research and Directions Forest Management Restoration and Regeneration Greenspace Securement Greenspace Management Waterfront Parks Conservation Parks Trails Black Creek Pioneer Village Events and Festivals Policy Development and Review School Programs Newcomer Services Family and Community Programs Living City Transition Program Community Engagement Financial Management Corporate Management and Governance Human Resources Corporate Communications Information Infrastructure and Management Project Recoveries Vehicles and Equipment Grand Total Q32020 Anticipated Q32020 Actual Q32020 Variance Expenditure Anticipated I Anticipated Q3 Actual I Actual Spend 1 $ Difference% Difference I Reportable 82,064,6541 45% 39,733,981 A D G H I Attachment 2: Capital Budget Revenues Watershed Planning and Reporting Climate Science Water Resource Science Erosion Management Flood Management Biodiversity Monitoring Ecosystem Management Research and Directions Forest Management Restoration and Regeneration Greenspace Securement Greenspace Management Waterfront Parks Conservation Parks Trails Black Creek Pioneer Village Events and Festivals Policy Development and Review School Programs Newcomer Services Family and Community Programs Living City Transition Program Community Engagement Financial Management Corporate Management and Governance Human Resources Corporate Communications Information Infrastructure and Management Project Recoveries Vehicles and Equipment Grand Total Q32020 Anticipated Q32020 Actual Q32020 Variance Anticipated Q3Revenue Anticipated Revenue Rate Actual Actual $ Difference %Difference Reportable 105,520,276 N S Attachment 3: Operating Budget Expenditures Q32020 Anticipated Q32020 Actual Q32020 Variance Expenditure Anticipated Anticipated Q3 Actual Actual Spend $Difference %Difference Reportable Expenditures Spend (%) Expenditures Rate Expenditures Spend Rate Variance Watershed Planning and Reporting 484,284 ................ 73% .. ............ 516,950 ............. 78% .............. (32,667) .............. -5% .............. .................... Climate Science- ................ .. ........................... 0% ... - .............. 0% .............. .............. 0% .................... Water Resource Science ..... ............ ..,........... ................. ........................... 0% , ... .i..,.......,....,....,................ .............. 0% .......................... ...... 0% ........... ...--- ---------------- .,_........ , Erosion Management ................ ,,,, ..... ......... ................ ,, 0 .. ........................... ,,,,,,,,.,, ... ,,,,,,,,,,,,.. O .............. , „ ,,,,,,,_ ........... ,,,,,,,,,,,,, 0% .............. ___________ .................... Flood Management ..... ......... 731,154 ............... .. ........................... 69% .. ............ ... 666,255 ............. .............. 63% .............. .............. 64,899 .............. .............. 6% .......... .................... ................... Biodiversity Monitoring ..... ......... 4,980 .. ........................... 66% ... 7,525 .............. 100% .............. (2,546) .............. -34% .................... Ecosystem Management Research and Directions- ............... 0% .. ............ - ............. 0% .............. - .............. 0% .............. .................... Forest Management ............... 91,741 .. ............ 72% ............. 64,949 .............. 51% .............. 26,792 .............. 21% .................... Restoration and Regeneration .... ......... 1,083,100 _ww,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_.,.,.,.,, .. ........... 100% wwwwwwwwwwwwwrww 706,376 ,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,, .............. 65% ,wwww.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,_ .............. 376,724 ,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., .............. 35% ,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., ,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,ww.,., ................., Greenspace Securement- ............... 0% .. ............ - ............. 0% .............. - .............. 0% .............. .................... Greenspace Management ..... ......... 586,786 ............... .. ............ 99% .. ............ ............. 507,528 ............. .............. 86% .............. .............. 79,257 .............. .............. 13 %• .............. .................... .................... Rental Properties .... ........ 1,239,792 .. ........................... 78% ... 1,040,399 .............. 66% .............. 199,394 __- 13% ................... Waterfront Parks - ............... 0% .. ............ - ............. 0% .............. - .............. 0% .............. .................... Conservation Parks -... ......... 4,076,474 ....... .....r .... .. ........................... 79% ............ ... 3,622,885 ............. .............. 70% .............. .............. 453,589 .............. .............. 9% .............. .................... ............,... Trails ............... ............ 0% ............. .............. .............. .............. O% .................... Bathurst Glen Golf Course 964,954 ................ 77% .. ............ 705,032 ............. 57% .............. 259,922 .............. 21% .............. .................... Black Creek Pioneer Village ..... ......... 2,883,567 .... ......... .. ........................... 71% .. ............ ... 1,550,972 ............. .............. 38% .............. .............. 1,332,596 .............................. .............. 33% .................... U ................ Events and Festivals ..... ......... 477,568 ,.. ...... .. ........................... ., 79% ... 181,752 ......... .............. 30% ......, .....:........ 295,816 ........ .............. ,49% .., .................. ............... Wedding and Corporate Events .., ...... - ..... ......... .. .........„ 0% .. ............ ............. .. - ............. .............. 0% .............. ......... - .............. ......... 0% .............. .......,.....,. .................... Development Planning and Regulation Permitting ..... ......... 4,960,299 _.. ............ .. ........................... 75% ....,....... ... 4,512,803 ............. .............. 68% .............. .............. 447,496 ......m .. _...,. .............. 7% .............. .................... ................... Environmental Assessment Planning and Permitting .... ......... 2,928,109 ---------------- .. ............ 76% ---------------- ............. 2,729,284 wwwwwwwwwwwwwww. .............. 71% --------------- .............. 198,825 --------------- .............. 5% wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwI ------------_.w,., .................... Policy Development and Review 415,348 ................ 75% .. ............ 413,788 ............. 75% .............. 1,559 .............. 0% .............. .................... School Programs ..... ......... 3834,142 .. ......... .. ............ 73% .. .............. ............. 2164,279 .,..........-, .............. 41% .............. .............. 1669,863 ............ .............. .32% .................... V ...........,___, Newcomer Services ... .......,.. 635,235 .............. 74% ............... 619,414 .............. 72% ________, 15,821 ............... ................ 2% Family and Community Programs 714,493 ................ 68% .. ............ 376,168 ............. 36% .............. 338,325 .............. 32% .............. .................... Living City Transition Program ..... ......... 99433 ................ .. ............ 69% .. ........... ............... 104,528 ......... .............. 72% .............. .............. (5,095) ............. .............. -4% .......... , .................... .................... Community Engagement ................ 553,926 .. ........................... 86% ... 92,818 .............. 14% .............. 461,108 .............. 72% .................... Social Enterprise Development- ............... ................ . ....................... 0% .. ............ .. - ............. .......... 0% .............. ......... - .............. 0% .............. .................... Financial Management 2,586,793 72% 2,154,79660% 431,998 12% Corporate Management and Governance ................ 51079,088 .. ........................... 85% ... 4,840,244 .............. 81% .............. 238,844 .............. 4% ................... Human Resources 1,113,664 74% 861,335 57% 252,329 ll% Attachment 3: Operating Budget Expenditures Corporate Communications Information Infrastructure and Management Project Recoveries Vehicles and Equipment Grand Total Q32020 Anticipated Q32020 Actual Q32020 Va ria nce Expenditure Anticipated Anticipated Q3 Actual Actual Spend $ Difference % Difference Reportable Expenditures Spend (%) Expenditures Rate Expenditures Spend Rate Variance 1538,096 ................ 76% .. ............ 1340,896 ............. 66% ......... 197,201 ............. 10% .................... ..... ......... 1769,731 .. ........................... 72% ... 1536,745 .............. 63% ................................ 232,985 9% .................... (2,282,152) ... ...... 57% . ............ (2,837,260) ......... 71% ......... 555,108 ......... -14% .........._ W .______________ (46,541) 71% (10,774) 16% (35,767) 54% --------------- 36,524,064 78% 28,469,687 61% 8,054,377 17% Attachment 4: Operating Budget Revenues Q32020 Anticipated Q32020 Actual Q32020 Variance Anticipated Q3 Expenditure Anticipated Revenue Rate Actual Actual $ Difference %Difference Reportable Revenues (%) Revenues Revenue Rate Revenues Revenue Rate Variance Watershed Planning and Reporting 653,047 ................ 98% .. ............ 664,700 ............. 100% .............. 11,653 .............. 2% .............. .................... Climate Science0% ................ ..... ......... .. ........................... .. ............ ... .:........... .............. 0% .............. .............. .....:........ .............. O% .............. .................... ................... Water Resource Science ................ - .. ........................... 0% ... - .............. 0% .............. - .............. 0% .................... Erosion Management 663,800 ............... 100% .. ............ 663,800 ............. 100% .............. - .............. 0% .............. .................... Flood Management ..... ......... 395,645 .. ............ 100% ............. 353,043 .............. 89% .............. (42,602) .............. -11% .................... Biodiversity Monitoring .... ......... .. ........... 0% .... .............. 0% .......... .............. 0w% wwwwwwwwwwwwww_. .................., Ecosystem Management Research and Directions- ............... 0% .. ............ - ............. 0% .............. - .............. 0% .............. .................... Forest Management ............... ..... ......... .. ............ 0% .. ............ ............. .:........... .............. 0% .............. .............. .....:........ .............. 0% .............. .................... .................... Restoration and Regeneration ..... ...... 62D,583 .. ........ ................. 46% ... 888,343 .............. 66% .............. 267,76D .............. 2D% ................... Greenspace Securement- ............... 0% .. ............ - ............. 0% .............. - .............. 0% .............. .................... Greenspace Management ............... ].22,764 ............... .. ........................... 57% .. ............ ... 137,388 ............. .............. 64% .............. .............. 14,625 .............. .............. 7% .............. .................... ............,... Rental Properties ..... ......... 3,095,300 .. ........................... 100% ... 1,068,506 .............. 35%(2,026,794) .............. .............. -65% .,., x Waterfront Parks- ............... 0% .. ............ - ............. 0% .............. - .............. 0% .............. .................... Conservation Parks ............... 6,163,176 .... ......... .. ........................... 92% .. ............ ... 3,621,422 ............. .............. 54% .............. .............. (2,541,754) .............. .............. -38% .............. .................... y ................., Trails ..... ......... _.... ....... .............. 0%0% ........., ............. :........ .............. .......... .............. ........ .............. 0% ......... ................... ............... Bathurst Glen Golf Course --------------- 967,113 ............... -------------- __, 76% .. ............ .,.,.,.,.,.,.,., 1105,217 ............. .....,.,.,.,.,., 87% .............. .............. 138,105 .............. ......... 11% .............. .......,....... .................... Black Creek Pioneer Village ..... ......... 1,429,584 _.. .....,.._.. .. ............ 70% ............ ............. 388,627 .............. .............. 19% .............. .............. (1,040,957) .............. .............. -51% ............ .................... 2 .. .................... Events and Festivals ..... ......... 732,557 .. ............ 70% ............. 55,189 .............. 5% .............. (677,368) .............. -65% .................... AA Wedding and Corporate Events- ............... ................ ......... 0% .. ............ ............... . - ............. ........ 0% .............. ......... - .............. ......... 0% .............. ............_. .................... Development Planning and Regulation Permitting ..... ......... 5,215,734 .. ............ 71% ............. 4,962,83068% .............. .............. (252,904) .............. -3% .................... Environmental Assessment Planning and Permitting ... ............ 2,568,212 ___ .............. ..... .................................. .................... 68% ....... ... ..... .. 2,333,455 ......_m____. ---------------- .'............. 62% ,______m________. .......... (234,757) .......... -6% _______________ ................. ------- Policy Development and Review - ................ 0%0% .. ............ ............. .............. - .............. O% .....:..... .................... School Programs -... ......... 4,801,665 .. ............ ................................ 83% 2,610,252 45% ................................ (2,191,412) -38% .................... BB Newcomer Services ..... ......... 668,395 .. ........................... 83% ... 600,877 .............. 75% .............. (67,519) .............. -8% .................... Family and Community Programs ... -__....... 374,456 ................ , 74% .. ............ ................................ ......... 208,119 .......... 41% .......... (166,336) .............. .......... -33% .............. .............. .................... Living City Transition Program ................ 154,700 .... ......... .. ............ ................................ 100% .. ............ 154,700 ............. 100% .............. .............. .....:........ .............. 0% .............. .................... ................., Community Engagement ..... ......... 466,589 ... ......., .. ............ 74% ....... ............. 136,800 ......... .............. 22% ......... .............. (329,789) ......... .............. -52% ......... ........... ................... Social Enterprise Development- ... ......., ................ ....... 0% ................ ......... - ............. ......... 0% .............. ......... - .............. ......... 0% .............. ............. .................... Financial Management ................ 11,300,069 .. ............ 98% ............. 11,418,599 .............. 99% .............. 118,530 .............. 1% .................... Corporate Management and Governance 121,044 28% (180,957) -42% (302,001) -70% Human Resources ................. - ................................................ 0% ......._................................, 8,000 0% ............................................................_ 8,000 ............ 0% Attachment 4: Operating Budget Revenues Corporate Communications Information Infrastructure and Management Project Recoveries Vehicles and Equipment Grand Total Q32020 Anticipated Q32020 Actual Q32020 Variance Anticipated Q3 Expenditure Anticipated Revenue Rate Actual Actual $ Difference % Difference Reportable Revenues ................. (%) ................ Revenues ............... Revenue Rate ...............,.......,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.......,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.. Revenues Revenue Rate Variance ...,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,. ................ 0%0% .. ............ ............. .............. .............. 0% .............. .................... ..... ......... 1,332 ..... ......... .. ........................... 89% .. ............ ... 3,334 ............. .............. 222% .............. .............. 2,002 .............. .............. 133% .............. .................... .................... ................ .. ........................... 0% ... .............. 0% .............. .............. 0% .................... ... ......., -0% ....... ........... 26,702 ......... 0% ......... 26,702 ......... 0% ............. 40,515,762 83% 31,228,948 64% (9,286,815) .19% Attachment 5: Variance Explanations CAPTIAL REPORTABLE VARIANCE NOTES - EXPENDITURES (Figures in 000's) A The lower than anticipated expenditures are due to the delay of in-person consultation for the Carruthers Creek Watershed Plan as a result of COVID-19. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $97 and 6% which is within the acceptable threshold. B The lower than anticipated expenditures are due the delay of a vehicle purchase to 2021 and lower than anticipated staff costs for the Port Lands Flood Protection project. Once these are taken into account, the variance is $406 and 9% which is within the acceptable threshold. C The lower than anticipated expenditures are due to COVID-19 delays and staff gapping for tributary monitoring and water quality monitoring, which are contracted services, in addition to cost savings realized in the Meadoway monitoring program. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $209 and 8% which is within the acceptable threshold. D The lower than anticipated expenditures are due to COVID-19 delays and staff gapping for a number of programs including: fisheries acoustic tagging, aquatic system science, and the terrestrial natural heritage project. Additionally, a delayed request for invoice for the York Urban Forest Canopy program will be paid in Q4. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $94 and 8% which is within the acceptable threshold. E The lower than anticipated expenditures are due to delays in the design and permitting for the Albion Hills Conservation Area new office and workshop as part of the Albion Hills Master Plan implementation. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $171 and 4% which is within the acceptable threshold. F The lower than anticipated expenditures are due to the delay in implementation of the Scarborough Waterfront Project, which has been deferred to 2021. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $206 and 7% which is within the acceptable threshold. G The lower than anticipated expenditures are due to a number of trail infrastructure projects including: Burke Brook Ravine trail improvements, which has been delayed due to the complexity of the design; Morningside Park trail improvements, which are delayed due to extended property and easement negotiations; Meadoway Trail implementation which has been deferred to 2021; Nashville Conservation Reserve Multi -Use Trail, which began construction in Q3 and will carry into 2021. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $884 and 8% which is within the acceptable threshold. H The lower than anticipated expenditures are due to the cancellation of in-person events and training, as well as staff gapping and redeployment of staff due to COVID-19 restrictions. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $529 and 9% which is within the acceptable threshold. I The lower than anticipated expenditures are due to the cancellation of community-based restoration activities and events in 2020 as a result of COVID-19. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $241 and 8% which is within the acceptable threshold. J The lower than anticipated expenditures are as a result of the previous delay in construction of the administrative office building. As a result of COVID-19 restrictions, construction and permitting were both delayed in Q2 but have since resumed with a revised substantial completion target of June 2022. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $2,879 and 9% which is within the acceptable threshold. CAPTIAL REPORTABLE VARIANCE NOTES - REVENUES (Figures in 000's) K Revenue is lower than anticipated due delayed invoicing for the Toronto Stormwater Management Pond Maintenance and Retrofits. Once this is taken into account, the variance is ($604) and -9% which is within the acceptable threshold. L Revenue is lower than anticipated due to timing of invoices for a number of capital works projects including: Lakeview Waterfront Connection Project, Upper Highland Trail at Ellesmere and Mud Creek Reach 6. Additionally, prior year agreement delays for Phase 1 of the East Don Trail and Ashbridge's Bay Landform Implementation have shifted portions of work forward into 2021. Once this is taken into account, the variance is ($6,563) and -8% which is within the acceptable threshold. Attachment 5: Variance Explanations M Revenue is lower than anticipated due to a delay in receipt of National Disaster and Mitigation Program (NDMP) V funding for several projects including: the City of Brampton Riverwalk Project, Pickering and Ajax Flood Control Dyke Restoration Environmental Assessment and Black Creek at Rockcliffe Special Policy Area Flood Remediation and Transportation Feasibility Study. Once this is taken into account, the variance is ($273) and -6% which is within the W acceptable threshold. N Revenue is higher than anticipated due to holding of surplus funds from the Toronto Wildlife Centre. Staff are working with the City of Toronto to direct this funding towards additional tree canopy restoration projects in 2021. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $709 and 7% which is within the acceptable threshold. O Revenue is lower than anticipated due to the revised 2020 scope of work for the Meadoway design and implementation. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $1 and 0% which is within the acceptable threshold. P Revenue is higher than anticipated due to carrying of funds to support implementation of the Scarborough Waterfront Project in 2021. Once this is taken into account, the variance is ($62) and -2% which is within the acceptable threshold. Q Revenue is lower than anticipated due to delays for a number of contracted service trail infrastructure projects including: The Meadoway, which has been deferred to 2021; Nashville Conservation Reserve, which is related to the timing of work; Burke Brook Ravine trail improvements, which has been delayed due to the complexity of the design, in addition to Claireville Trail, Oak Ridges Corridor East and Moriningside Park trail improvements which are delayed due to extended agreement negotiations. Once this is taken into account, the variance is ($62) and -2% which is within the acceptable threshold. R Revenue is higher than anticipated due to the carrying of a portion of funding to support site access enhancements at Bolton Camp in 2021. Once this is taken into account, the variance is ($18) and 0% which is within the acceptable threshold. S Revenue is lower than anticipated due to the cancellation of in-person training programs and events. Additionally, Toronto Green Streets funding has not been received due to construction delays related to the STEP Water and Energy program. Once this is taken into account, the variance is ($319) and -S% which is within the acceptable threshold. T Revenue is lower than anticipated due to the previous delay in construction of the administrative office building. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $694 and 8% which is within the acceptable threshold. OPERATING REPORTABLE VARIANCE NOTES - EXPENDITURES (Figures in 000's) U The lower than anticipated expenditures are as a result of the closure of Black Creek Pioneer Village during Q2 and Q3 due to COVID-19. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $348 and 9% which is within the acceptable threshold. V The lower than anticipated expenditures are as a result of the closure of all education centres and cancellation of programming in Q2 and Q3 due to COVID-19. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $431 and 8% which is within the acceptable threshold. W The higher than anticipated recoveries are due to the implementation of major capital works that were delayed throughout 2019 including Ashbridge's Bay, Upper Highland Trail at Ellesmere and the water and waste water infrastructure improvements at Bolton Camp. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $0 and 0% which is within the acceptable threshold. OPERATING REPORTABLE VARIANCE NOTES - REVENUES (Figures in 000's) X Revenues are lower than anticipated due to a delay in receipt of residential and commercial rental income as a result of COVID-19. Discussions are ongoing regarding revised payment schedules. Once this is taken into account, the variance is ($240) and -8% which is within the acceptable threshold. Attachment 5: Variance Explanations Y Revenues are lower than anticipated due to the closure of TRCA parks and facilities in Q2 and Q3 as a result of COVID- 19. Once this is taken into account, the variance is ($532) and -8% which is within the acceptable threshold. Z Revenues are lower than anticipated due to labour disruptions and the previous closure of Black Creek Pioneer Village during Q2 and Q3 as a result of COVID-19. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $54 and 3% which is within the acceptable threshold. AA Revenues are lower than anticipated due to the previous closure of TRCA facilities as a result of COVID-19 and restricted operations since re -opening in August. Once this is taken into account, the variance is ($11) and -1% which is within the acceptable threshold. BB Revenues are lower than anticipated due the cancellation of education programs as a result of COVID-19.Once this is taken into account, the variance is ($154) and -3% which is within the acceptable threshold. RES.#B94/20 - 2020 COVID-19 UPDATE To provide an update to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Board of Directors regarding the financial impacts of COVID-19. Moved by: Anthony Perruzza Seconded by: Linda Jackson IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT this COVID-19 Financial Update report be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND Since the commencement of COVID-19's impact on TRCA operations in March 2020, staff have provided updates to the Board of Directors regarding the ongoing response to the pandemic in the form of reports, memos, and presentations. These updates provide an overview of the changing circumstances around the work environment, financial implications, and operational restrictions that TRCA continues to face. These updates outlined TRCAs response through prevention, control, and recovery to manage the uncertain and constantly changing circumstances as part of the pandemic response. Below is a list of previous reports that have contained information regarding COVID-19 impacts and response: • April 24, 2020 Presentation: Board of Directors COVID-19 Briefing — N. Blake • April 24, 2020 Board Report: 2020 Budget— M. Tolensky • April 24, 2020 Board Report: 2020 Budgetary Update COVID19 Impact— M. Tolensky • April 24, 2020 Board Report: TRCA Administrative Office Building Project — M. Tolensky • May 1, 2020 Executive Report: 2020 Three Month Financial Report — M. Tolensky • May 22, 2020 Board Report: TRCA Administrative Office Building Project - M. Tolensky • May 22, 2020 Board Report: TRCA Enforcement and Compliance During COVID-19 - S. Dhalla • June 26, 2020 Board Report: COVID-19 Update — M. Tolensky • September 11, 2020 Executive Report: COVID-19 Financial Update — M. Tolensky Bill 195 received Royal Assent on July 21, 2020, ending the State of Emergency in Ontario, while continuing certain orders made under the Province's COVID-19 emergency legislation. All partner municipalities within TRCA's jurisdiction were in Stage 3 of the Framework for Reopening our Province until the end of the third quarter. In November, the province introduced a new tiered system for COVID-19 restrictions. Throughout November and December provincial restrictions continued within TRCA's jurisdiction through to a province -wide lockdown implemented on December 26, 2020. Under lockdown, widescale measures and restrictions include a prohibition on indoor public events and social gatherings and maximum of 10 people permitted at outdoor events. RATIONALE TRCA believes in transparency and accountability for its spending, revenue recognition and performance of service delivery objectives against approved budgets, for both the organization and for each project and program as an individual endeavor. This is further supported by TRCA's core values of integrity, collaboration, accountability, respect and excellence. TRCA recognizes that all projects and programs offered have cost implications and that all costs incurred are reasonable and practical in support of services. Transparency throughout the budget management process is achieved in part through the analysis and reporting on year-to- date revenues/expenses as compared to the current fiscal year budget. Due to the ongoing pressures from COVID-19, TRCA regularly analyzes the operating and capital year to date actuals against budget to identify major variances in the expenses and revenues. A further analysis on the direct impacts from COVID-19 on the budget is required to enable ongoing adaptations as directed by TRCA's Board of Directors. Given that the majority of impacts are concentrated in TRCA's revenue generation potential, the following sections of this report highlight the status of the Authority Generated revenues and a mitigation plan where major variances are noted. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategy set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 9 — Measure performance FINANCIAL DETAILS TRCA's capital projects and programs operate on a cost recoverable basis and have not been financially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. As noted in the September 11, 2020 Board Report entitled 2020 COVID-19 Financial Impact, based on the modified restrictions that were in place, TRCA staff anticipated a loss of $16 million to operating revenues. However, with the transition of Provincial directives moving into phase 3 during the third quarter, TRCA was able to maximize the revenue potential through a modified reopening of its public use facilities. This enabled further reductions in the projected annual revenue loss from the originally forecasted $20 million. As of the third quarter, staff now project the potential of a $13.5 million loss to budgeted Authority Generated revenues which equates to 47%. This can be directly attributed to the hard work of staff across the organization in adapting ongoing programming to meet the provincial directives. In analyzing TRCA's operating performance over the nine-month period, TRCA has been able to manage the impact on the organization's operating budget as outlined in Table 1 below. Table 1 — TRCA Operatinq Budqet (Actual Nine -Month Performance) TRCA Operating 2020 2019 $ Variance $ Revenue 31,488,265 38,602,219 (7,113,955) Expenditures 28,541,323 35,026,063 (6,484,740) Excess of Revenue over Expenditures 2,946,942 3,576,156 (629,215) Operating Variance Explanation In analyzing TRCA's service area performance over the nine-month period, thresholds consistent with those utilized in the 2020 Nine Month Financial Report, +/-10% and $500,000, were applied to authority generated revenue as shown in Table 2 below. Table 2 — Authority Generated Revenue (Actual Nine -Month Performance) Service Area 2020 2019 Variance Variance Reportable $ $ $ % Variance Watershed Studies and Strategies Water Risk Management - 11,781 11,781 Regional Biodiversity 900,993 595,302 (305,691) -33.9% Greenspace Securement 1,087,115 3,229,532 2,142,417 197.1% A and Management Tourism and Recreation 4,099,750 8,585,353 4,485,602 109.4% B Planning and Development Review 5,452,434 5,041,050 (411,384) -7.5% 1,547,927 Education and Outreach 873,758 2,723,679 1,849,921 211.7% C Sustainable Communities 136,800 111,593 (25,208) -18.4% Corporate Services 80,801 532,838 452,037 559.4% Total 12,631,652 20,831,128 8,199,475 64.9% The following explanations support the variation in TRCA generated revenue over the nine- month period: A - Greenspace Securement & Management Table 3 — Greenspace Securement & Manaclement (Actual Nine -Month Performance) Authority generated revenue in the Greenspace Securement & Management service area has decreased due to ongoing negotiations surrounding commercial and residential rental income and easement agreements. To date, 26.7% of the revenue variance has been offset by expenditure reductions. Staff are working to recover outstanding residential rental income and are forecasting minimal losses ($20,000). Commercial rent is anticipated to be recovered although portions have been deferred to 2021. Additional information can be found in the Board Report titled WW TORONTO HOLDINGS L.P. (COB WET N WILD TORONTO). B - Tourism and Recreation Table 4 — Tourism & Recreation (Actual Nine -Month Performance) 2020 2019 Variance ($) Variance (%) TRCA Generated Revenue 1,087,115 3,229,532 (2,142,417) -66.3% Expenditures 1,547,927 2,120,979 (573,052) -27.0% Excess of Revenue over Expenditures (460,812) 1,108,553 (1,569,365) -141% Authority generated revenue in the Greenspace Securement & Management service area has decreased due to ongoing negotiations surrounding commercial and residential rental income and easement agreements. To date, 26.7% of the revenue variance has been offset by expenditure reductions. Staff are working to recover outstanding residential rental income and are forecasting minimal losses ($20,000). Commercial rent is anticipated to be recovered although portions have been deferred to 2021. Additional information can be found in the Board Report titled WW TORONTO HOLDINGS L.P. (COB WET N WILD TORONTO). B - Tourism and Recreation Table 4 — Tourism & Recreation (Actual Nine -Month Performance) Authority generated revenue in the Tourism & Recreation service area has decreased due to the previous closure of TRCA's public use facilities starting in the first quarter, with a gradual reopening commencing in the second quarter and remaining in place until the end of the third quarter. To date, 61.8% of the revenue variance has been offset by a subsequent reduction in expenditures for this service area. The importance of providing conservation parks and attractions for the public has been apparent throughout the COVID-19 pandemic as demand for the parks, trails and programs TRCA delivers has been very high. As previously reported, TRCA's conservation parks remained open additional weekends until October 31 to meet high demand. Park facilities are now closed for the season, with the exception of Albion Hills which operates year-round. 2020 2019 Variance ($) Variance (%) TRCA Generated Revenue 4,099,750 8,585,353 (4,485,602) -52.2% Expenditures 6,055,131 8,829,156 (2,774,026) -31.4% Excess of Revenue over Expenditures (1,955,380) (243,804) (1,711,577) 702.0% Authority generated revenue in the Tourism & Recreation service area has decreased due to the previous closure of TRCA's public use facilities starting in the first quarter, with a gradual reopening commencing in the second quarter and remaining in place until the end of the third quarter. To date, 61.8% of the revenue variance has been offset by a subsequent reduction in expenditures for this service area. The importance of providing conservation parks and attractions for the public has been apparent throughout the COVID-19 pandemic as demand for the parks, trails and programs TRCA delivers has been very high. As previously reported, TRCA's conservation parks remained open additional weekends until October 31 to meet high demand. Park facilities are now closed for the season, with the exception of Albion Hills which operates year-round. Filming permits for several films and programs, as well as a Canadian Tire Christmas Drive - Through event, made for a very busy fall season which generated additional revenue. Staff continue to work with the film and event sectors as they too adjust and adapt to COVID-19 related regulations. Staff have been very supportive and worked extra hard to bring successful contracts into place. C- Education and Outreach Table 5 — Education & Outreach (Actual Nine -Month Performance) 2020 2019 Variance ($) Variance (%) TRCA Generated Revenue 873,758 2,723,679 (1,849,921) -67.9% Expenditures 3,159,338 4,964,846 (1,805,508) -36.4% Excess of Revenue over (2,285,580) Expenditures (2,241,167) (44,413) 2.0% Authority generated revenue in the Education & Outreach service area has decreased due to the previous closure of TRCA's educational facilities starting in the first quarter. TRCA initiated alternative programming and delivery methods as a means of adapting business operations to the changing circumstances while continuing to stay relevant. While TRCA's three field centres remain closed, the Kortright Centre for Conservation and Black Creek Pioneer Village were open for modified business and still projected reduced revenues due to the restrictions related to COVID-19. Staff continue to develop programs for virtual audiences, in particular students and schools, while also adapting small group in-person community learning activities in local greenspaces as appropriate based on Provincial and local health regulations and guidelines. To date, 97.5% of the revenue losses have been offset by a subsequent reduction in expenditures. Furthermore, to respond to COVID-19 restrictions, The Forgetful Elf, a new holiday -themed drive-through event was launched at Albion Hills Conservation Area in December, with other adaptations being explored for both new and existing programs that will allow for the flexible delivery of TRCA programming, and new revenue -generating opportunities, that is compatible with public health guidance. Overall The decrease in the excess of revenue over expenditures of $629,215 is attributable to unavoidable organizational operating costs, which could not be reduced to correspond with the decrease in revenue. Further efforts are being made to minimize the financial impacts to the organization through applications under the Federal governments COVID-19 relief programs such as Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy, which will continue to be completed for the 2020 fiscal year in 2021, in accordance with the terms of the programs. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Looking out to a modified operating landscape which is expected to continue into the first half of 2021, TRCA's Senior Leadership Team is adapting 2021 financial plans and activities to operate safely and sustainably in this new environment. Staff will continue to monitor the financial health of the organization and report to the Board of Directors and TRCA's partner municipalities on the impacts of COVID-19. Report prepared by: Jenifer Moravek, extension 5659 Emails: jenifer.moravek(a)trca.ca For Information contact: Michael Tolensky, extension 5965 Emails: michael.tolensky(atrca.ca Date: November 13, 2020 Section IV — Ontario Regulation 166/06, As Amended APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, written permission from the Authority is required for: a) straightening, changing, diverting or interfering in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream or watercourse, or for changing or interfering in any way with a wetland; b) development, if in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches or pollution or the conservation of land may be affected by the development. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land is affected. Moved by: Paul Ainslie Seconded by: Joanne Dies THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, for the applications which are listed below: CARRIED MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATIONS 10.1 - 10.2 — REGULAR — FOR APPROVAL Applications that involved a more complex suite of technical studies to demonstrate consistency with policies; applications that cover a significant geographic area, extensive modifications to the landscape, major infrastructure projects, applications requiring site specific conditions and permissions that extend beyond two years. CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 10.1 CITY OF TORONTO To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade, temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material originating on the site or elsewhere and alter a watercourse at 60 Chapman Road, west of Scarlett Road, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to reconstruct an approximately 120 metre stretch of the Humber Creek to provide sanitary sewer protection at 60 Chapman Road, west of Scarlett Road, in the City of Toronto. In/near water works will occur as part of channel reconstruction. CFN: 63078 - Application #: 0378/201TOR Report Prepared by: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca For information contact: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca Date: November 25, 2020 10.2 CITY OF TORONTO To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade, temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere and alter a watercourse on Van Dusen Boulevard, between Meadowvale Drive and Orchard Crescent, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Toronto, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority under Management Agreement with the City of Toronto, and on the private properties located at 48 Van Dusen Boulevard and 73 Van Dusen Boulevard. The is to construct a new pedestrian bridge on Van Dusen Boulevard across Mimico Creek and to reconstruct an approximately 170 m stretch of Mimico Creek, between Meadowvale Drive and Orchard purpose Crescent, in the City of Toronto. In/near water works will occur as part of channel reconstruction. CFN: 63508 - Application #: 0719/201TOR Report Prepared by: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca For information contact: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca Date: December 16, 2020 RES.#B96/20 - DELEGATED PERMITS Moved by: Paul Ainslie Seconded by: Joanne Dies THAT standard delegated permits, permission for routine infrastructure works, minor works letters of approval, and permits after the fact / resolution of violations granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff, in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, which are listed below, be received. CARRIED STANDARD PERMITS FOR RECEIPT— STAFF APPROVED AND ISSUED Standard permits are non-complex permissions consistent with TRCA approved policies and procedures and issued for a time period of two years or less. CITY OF BRAMPTON 2185715 ONTARIO INC. (ROYAL PINE HOMES) - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed to facilitate final grading and servicing associated with a draft plan of subdivision application and zoning by-law amendment application to permit a residential development consisting of fifty-seven (57) single -detached dwellings located at the south-west corner of McVean Drive and Mayfield Road. CFN: 63719 - Application #: 0989/201BRAM Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244, email adam.miller@trca.ca For information contact: Adam Miller, extension 5244, email adam.miller@trca.ca Date: November 9, 2020 102 NAPERTON DRIVE - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a second dwelling unit, a below -grade entrance and the enlargement of an existing window, located in the basement of the existing house. The subject property is located at 102 Naperton Drive, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 63922 - Application M 1104/20/BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: November 17, 2020 37 RUBYSILVER DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a second swelling unit, a below -grade entrance and a new window, in addition to the enlargement of an existing window, located in the basement of the existing house. The subject property is located at 37 Rubysilver Drive, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 63712 - Application M 0853/20/13RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: November 25, 2020 50 HAVILAND CIRCLE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a second dwelling unit, a side entrance and 4 new windows, located in the basement of the existing house. The purpose of this permit is also to recognize the development of a 3.34 sq.m. (36 sq.ft) shed on a 5.94 sq.m. (64 sq.ft.) concrete pad located to the rear of the house. The subject property is located at 50 Haviland Circle, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 63743 - Application M 0913/20113RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: November 16, 2020 21 LINSTOCK DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a second dwelling unit and the enlargement of 4 existing windows, located in the basement of the existing house. The subject property is located at 21 Linstock Drive, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 64034 - Application #: 1140/20/13RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: November 27, 2020 6 LONDON LANE - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a second dwelling unit, a below -grade entrance, a new window, and the enlargement of an existing window, located in the basement of the existing house. The subject property is located at 6 London Lane, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 63725 - Application #: 1005/20/BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: October 27, 2020 6 MAPLECREST COURT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a second dwelling unit, a below grade entrance, a new window and the enlargement of an existing window, located in the basement of the existing house. The subject property is located at 6 Maplecrest Court, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 63923 - Application #: 1127/201BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: November 25, 2020 17 HUNTSPOINT DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a second dwelling unit and the enlargement of 3 existing windows, located in the basement of the existing house. The subject property is located at 17 Huntspoint Drive, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 63903 - Application #: 1050/20/BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: November 4, 2020 16 HORIZON STREET - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to facilitate, within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed, the development of a new below grade entrance on lands known municipally as 16 Horizon Street, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 63898 - Application #: 1038/20/13RAM Report Prepared by: Anthony Syhlonyk, extension 5272, email anthony.syhlonyk@trca.ca For information contact: Adam Miller, extension 5244, email adam.miller@trca.ca Date: October 30, 2020 CITY OF MARKHAM 56 PRINCE EDWARD BOULEVARD - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Don River watershed to facilitate the development of a sports court, storage shed, swim spa, regrading and paving works at the rear of the existing dwelling at 56 Prince Edward Boulevard. CFN: 63852 - Application #: 1000/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca Date: December 2, 2020 25 JOSIAH COURT - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Rouge River watershed to facilitate the construction of two decks attached to the rear side of an existing dwelling located at 25 Josiah Court, Markham. CFN: 63574 - Application #: 0814/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca Date: November 16, 2020 18 PRINCE EDWARD BOULEVARD - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Don River watershed to facilitate development of a replacement retaining wall located at the rear of the existing dwelling at 18 Prince Edward Boulevard. CFN: 63568 - Application #: 1055/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca Date: December 10, 2020 LADIES' GOLF CLUB OF TORONTO - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Don River watershed to facilitate repairs to an existing concrete entrance road bridge at 7859 Yonge Street, Markham. CFN: 63731 - Application #: 0962/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 LINDWIDE DEVELOPMENTS (CORNELL) LIMITED - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to conduct topsoil stripping, grading works and installation of erosion and sediment control measures within a Regulated Area of the Rouge River watershed at 6937 Highway 7 in the City of Markham. CFN: 63486 - Application #: 0749/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca For information contact: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca Date: November 25, 2020 UNISCOPE FINANCIAL CORPORATION - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Rouge River watershed to facilitate the replacement of a septic system at the rear of an existing dwelling at 10346 McCowan Road. CFN: 63384 - Application #: 0770/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca Date: November 19, 2020 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to replace a storm sewer located at 1820 Mattawa Avenue near Dundas Street East and Dixie Road, in the City of Mississauga. CFN: 63069 - Application #: 0376/201MISS Report Prepared by: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca For information contact: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca Date: December 1, 2020 SOUTHDOWN BUILDERS LIMITED - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to facilitate, within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed, the development of a new driveway access to support outdoor storage uses on lands known municipally as 7765 Tranmere Drive, in the City of Mississauga. CFN: 63899 - Application #: 1039/20/MISS Report Prepared by: Anthony Syhlonyk, extension 5272, email anthony.syhlonyk@trca.ca For information contact: Adam Miller, extension 5244, email adam.miller@trca.ca Date: November 11, 2020 CITY OF PICKERING 946 VISTUAL DRIVE - Frenchman's Bay Watershed The purpose is to construct a second storey addition over an existing garage and a new wood deck on the south side of the single family dwelling located at 946 Vistula Drive in the City of Pickering. CFN: 63413 - Application #: 0647/20/PICK Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: November 17, 2020 121 SANDCHERRY COURT - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to construct a covered deck at the rear of the existing dwelling at 121 Sandcherry Court in the City of Pickering. CFN: 63683 - Application #: 0949/201PICK Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: October 9, 2020 CITY OF PICKERING - Waterfront Watershed The purpose is to relocate an existing driveway at 501 Marksbury Road which is at risk due to slope instability from coastal processes along the Lake Ontario shoreline. No in -water works will be required. This permit was reviewed in accordance with the TRCA Permission for Emergency Infrastructure Works Review Protocol (Authority Res. #A105/15). CFN: 63894 - Application #: 1097/201PICK Report Prepared by: Sharon Lingertat, extension 5717, email sharon.lingertat@trca.ca For information contact: Sharon Lingertat, extension 5717, email s haron.l i nge rtat@trca.ca Date: November 20, 2020 METROPIA (NOTION ROAD) DEVELOPMENT INC. - Duffins Creek Watershed The purpose is to site grade (cut / fill) for the purpose of creating a development block for a future townhouse development and an open space block for wetland and other habitat restoration and to accommodate flood storage at 1856 Notion Road in the City of Pickering CFN: 63688 - Application #: 1082/201PICK Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: December 14, 2020 ONTARIO POWER GENERATION INC. - Waterfront Watershed The purpose is to undertake emergency works to repair failed outflow embankments at the Pickering Nuclear Generation Station located at 1675 Montgomery Park Road, in the City of Pickering. This permit was reviewed in accordance with the TRCA Permission for Emergency Infrastructure Works Review Protocol (Authority Res. #A105/15). CFN: 63590 - Application #: 0804/20/PICK Report Prepared by: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca For information contact: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca Date: November 12, 2020 ONTARIO POWER GENERATION INC. - Waterfront Watershed The purpose is to install a temporary tent structure and piping for a bubble curtain system on the Lake Ontario shoreline at 1675 Montgomery Park Road, in the City of Pickering. CFN: 63856 - Application #: 0997/20/PICK Report Prepared by: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca For information contact: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca Date: December 3, 2020 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM - Duffins Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct a new forcemain from the new Mulberry Lane Sanitary Sewage Pumping Station to future Peter Matthews Drive. These works are part of the servicing for the new Seaton community. CFN: 63054 - Application #: 0284/201PICK Report Prepared by: Sharon Lingertat, extension 5717, email sharon.lingertat@trca.ca For information contact: Sharon Lingertat, extension 5717, email sharon.lingertat@trca.ca Date: November 20, 2020 5070 WILLIAM STREET - Duff ins Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct an inground pool and interlock patio in the rear yard of the existing dwelling at 5070 William Street in the City of Pickering. CFN: 63680 - Application #: 0936/20/PICK Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: October 7, 2020 CITY OF RICHMOND HILL 775377 ONTARIO LIMITED - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to conduct topsoil stripping, stockpiling and install erosion and sediment control measures associated with the site alteration works for Draft Plan of Subdivision (19T(R)-13015 - 775377 Ontario Limited) within a Regulated Area of the Rouge River watershed at 4541 Leslie Street in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 58382 - Application #: 0959/17/RH Report Prepared by: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca For information contact: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca Date: December 2, 2020 CAL -LESLIE DEVELOPMENTS INC. - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to facilitate initial site grading and site preparation works associated with a new residential plan of subdivision located at 12826 Leslie Street and 12844 Leslie Street, City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 63432 - Application #: 0599/20/RH Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324, email quentin.hanchard@trca.ca For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324, email quentin.hanchard@trca.ca Date: December 15, 2020 CITY OF RICHMOND HILL - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake replacement of a children's playground at the Humber Flats Mallard Marsh Children's Playground, north of Red Cardinal Trail near at Bathurst Street and Bloomington Road. There are no in -water or near water works within the scope of this project. CFN: 63620 - Application #: 0868/201RH Report Prepared by: Shirin Varzgani, extension 5785, email shirin.varzgani@trca.ca For information contact: Shirin Varzgani, extension 5785, email shirin.varzgani@trca.ca Date: November 30, 2020 DORMER BOND INC. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate topsoil stripping, grading works and servicing associated with a Zoning By-law Amendment (D02-18009) and Site Plan (D06-18017) applications to permit residential development on lands west of Yonge Street and south of Bond Crescent, in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 63726 - Application #: 0954/201RH Report Prepared by: Linda Bui, extension 5289, email linda.bui@trca.ca For information contact: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca Date: November 6, 2020 EARLGLEN INVESTMENTS INC. - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to conduct topsoil stripping and install erosion and sediment control measures associated with a Draft Plan of Subdivision (1 9T(R)-0301 0) within a Regulated Area of the Rouge River watershed at 921 19th Avenue in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 54682 - Application #: 0943/15/RH Report Prepared by: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca For information contact: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca Date: November 17, 2020 ELBAY DEVELOPMENTS INC. - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to conduct grading works associated with the construction of a stormwater management pond and implement Erosion and Sediment Control measures for a proposed townhome development within a Regulated Area of the Rouge River watershed at 930 Elgin Mills Road East in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 63562 - Application #: 0748/20/RH Report Prepared by: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca For information contact: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca Date: November 5, 2020 FORTUNE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT INC. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order facilitate the construction of a single detached dwelling at 0 Briarhill Boulevard, in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 63729 - Application #: 0984/201RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: December 22, 2020 HOLY TRINITY SCHOOL - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to Undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Rouge River Watershed in order to facilitate the clean out of accumulated sediment in a drainage swale associated with their regular maintenance program on lands west of Bayview Avenue and south of 19th Avenue, at 11300 Bayview Avenue, in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 62685 - Application #: 0026/20/RH Report Prepared by: Linda Bui, extension 5289, email linda.bui@trca.ca For information contact: Linda Bui, extension 5289, email linda.bui@trca.ca Date: November 20, 2020 LESLIE RICHMOND DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to conduct grading works and construct a Stormwater Management Pond as well as an associated outfall, outfall wetland and bioswale associated with an approved Draft Plan of Subdivision (19T-15007 - Leslie Richmond Developments Ltd.) within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Rouge River watershed at 1521 19th Avenue in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 62078 - Application #: 0872/19/RH Report Prepared by: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca For information contact: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca Date: December 7, 2020 LESLIE RICHMOND DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to conduct grading works and construct servicing (sanitary, water, stormwater management and roadways) associated with an approved Draft Plan of Subdivision (19T-15007 - Leslie Richmond Developments Ltd.) within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Rouge River watershed at 1521 19th Avenue in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 62079 - Application #: 0871/191RH Report Prepared by: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca For information contact: Anthony Sun, extension 5724, email anthony.sun@trca.ca Date: December 7, 2020 72 NAUGHTON ROAD - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Don River Watershed in order to facilitate fill removal and landscape restoration near a watercourse as well as basement foundation waterproofing for an existing single detached dwelling. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 72 Naughton Drive, in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 63730 - Application #: 0966/20/RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: December 10, 2020 2 ALHART STREET - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Don River Watershed to facilitate the construction of a replacement deck. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 2 Alhart Street, in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 63850 - Application #: 0985/201RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: October 19, 2020 TORONTO MONTESSORI SCHOOLS - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Rouge River Watershed in order to facilitate the relocation of parking for the re -purposing of the existing building for the temporary use of classrooms associated with Zoning By-law Amendment (D02- 20020) and Site Plan (D06-20044) applications on lands west of Bayview Avenue and north of Elgin Mills Road East, at 93 Edward Avenue, in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 64100 - Application #: 1178/20/RH Report Prepared by: Linda Bui, extension 5289, email linda.bui@trca.ca For information contact: Linda Bui, extension 5289, email linda.bui@trca.ca Date: December 7, 2020 20 WILDFLOWER DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed to facilitate the construction of a replacement deck. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 20 Wildflower Drive, in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 63474 - Application #: 0983/20/RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: November 30, 2020 219 LAKELAND CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order facilitate the construction of a single detached replacement dwelling at 219 Lakeland Crescent, in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 63475 - Application #: 0845/20/RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: November 2, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 84 CAYUGA AVENUE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a front and side addition to the existing rear detached garage at 84 Cayuga Avenue in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 63947 - Application #: 1131/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 62 WESTLEIGH CRESCENT - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct a pool and associated hardscape at 62 Westleigh Crescent in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 63773 - Application #: 0942/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rap us@trca.ca Date: November 30, 2020 CEDAR GROVE ESTATES INC. C/O H&R PROPERTY MANAGEMENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to repurpose the existing sports court and construct a new surface parking lot and driveway at 50 Panorama Court in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York). CFN: 63775 - Application #: 0944/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Nicole Moxley, extension 5968, email nicole.moxley@trca.ca For information contact: Nicole Moxley, extension 5968, email nicole.moxley@trca.ca Date: November 20, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct approximately 1200 metres of new 300 mm diameter PVC sanitary forcemain at 10 Catherine Street, between Home Smith Park Road and Old Mill Drive, in the City of Toronto. Near water works will occur as part of forcemain construction. CFN: 62292 - Application #: 0221/201TOR Report Prepared by: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca For information contact: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca Date: December 2, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a new pedestrian bridge in Lambton Woods, just east of Royal York Road, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 63067 - Application #: 0349/201TOR Report Prepared by: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca For information contact: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca Date: December 17, 2020 30 NORTH DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two-storey rear addition to the two-storey single family dwelling at 30 North Drive in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 63949 - Application #: 1136/201TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 837 ROYAL YORK ROAD - Mimico Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct a two-storey replacement dwelling with an integral garage and front porch at 837 Royal York Road in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). The proposal also involves the construction of two landscaping walls to the front of the dwelling, minor site grading and the removal of a rear wooden canopy and shed. CFN: 63109 - Application #: 0345/201TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 30, 2020 66 NORTH PARK DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two-storey replacement dwelling with an integral garage and rear wood deck at 66 North Park Drive in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). The proposal also involves minor site grading and landscaping to the rear. CFN: 63366 - Application #: 0608/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: October 28, 2020 30 WOOLTON CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two-storey replacement dwelling with an integral garage and rear deck at 30 Woolton Crescent in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). The proposal also involves the removal of a rear concrete walkway and landscaping wall. CFN: 62415 - Application #: 1100/19/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rap us@trca.ca Date: November 4, 2020 90 EDENBRIDGE DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct four rear and side additions to the existing two storey single family dwelling at 90 Edenbridge Drive in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 63113 - Application #: 0351/201TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 30, 2020 4 EDENBRIDGE DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two-storey replacement dwelling with an integral garage, rear covered porch, and basement walkout at 4 Edenbridge Drive in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). The proposal also involves minor site grading. CFN: 62248 - Application #: 1065/19/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 30, 2020 49 ORCHARD CRESCENT - Mimico Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct an in -ground pool, spa and associated hardscaping at 49 Orchard Crescent in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 63837 - Application #: 1045/201TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 11, 2020 45 BURNHAMTHORPE PARK BOULEVARD - Mimico Creek Watershed The purpose is to replace an existing rear deck at 45 Burnhamthorpe Park Boulevard in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 63771 - Application #: 0935/201TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 16, 2020 5 HATTON COURT - Mimico Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct a one -storey front addition, a second storey addition over the existing footprint, and a front landing and steps at 5 Hatton Court in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 63355 - Application #: 0585/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: December 15, 2020 10 PINEHILL CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a three-storey replacement dwelling with an integral garage at 10 Pinehill Crescent in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 63937 - Application #: 1089/201TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 16, 2020 45 VAN DUSEN BOULEVARD - Mimico Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct a new two storey single family detached dwelling at 45 Van Dusen Boulevard in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York). The existing dwelling is to be demolished. CFN: 64055 - Application #: 1149/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Nicole Moxley, extension 5968, email nicole.moxley@trca.ca For information contact: Nicole Moxley, extension 5968, email nicole.moxley@trca.ca Date: December 8, 2020 7 MARLEBON ROAD - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to convert the basement into a secondary suite at 7 Marlebon Road in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 63830 - Application #: 1018/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 18, 2020 34 RIVERCREST ROAD - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two-storey side addition, a second storey addition and a rear deck to the existing two-storey single family dwelling at 34 Rivercrest Road in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 62429 - Application #: 1164/19/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 4, 2020 53 CORNELIUS PARKWAY - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two-storey replacement dwelling with a rear deck and steps at 53 Cornelius Parkway in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). The proposal also involves minor site grading. CFN: 64063 - Application #: 1173/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rapus@trca.ca Date: December 15, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 105 POST ROAD - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two storey replacement dwelling with raised patio, rear covered porch, pool and associated hard landscaping at 105 Post Road in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council). CFN: 61753 - Application #: 0659/191TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: July 4, 2019 47 RONDEAU DRIVE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a replacement one storey rear addition to the existing single family dwelling at 47 Rondeau Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council). CFN: 63039 - Application #: 0288/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rapus@trca.ca Date: March 27, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake storm sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain upgrades on Franklin Avenue, Cameron Avenue, Brentwood Avenue and Roycrest Avenue, west of Yonge Street, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 63296 - Application #: 0603/201TOR Report Prepared by: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca For information contact: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca Date: November 23, 2020 DON MILLS (ARH) HOMES LTD. - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Don River Watershed in order to facilitate grading works, proposed sidewalks, streetscape and installation of servicing in support of the development project - Crosstown, at 844 Don Mills Road, 1150 and 1155 Eglinton Avenue East in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 63099 - Application M 0336/201TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: November 13, 2020 DONALDA CLUB - Don River Watershed The purpose is to facilitate necessary repair works to address bank erosion at 5 separate sites along the Don River watercourse at 12 Bushbury Drive - Donalda Club in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 62681 - Application M 0032/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: December 4, 2020 68 LANGHOLM DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a second storey addition, two storey addition to the front and basement walkout to the existing single family dwelling at 68 Langholm Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 64057 - Application M 1150/20ITOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: December 2, 2020 2 MOOREHILL DRIVE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two and a half storey replacement dwelling where there is an existing two storey dwelling located at 2 Moorehill Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 64059 - Application M 1151/201TOR Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email steph an i e.worron@trca.ca Date: December 8, 2020 91 GLEN EDYTH DRIVE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a replacement two storey single family detached dwelling at 91 Glen Edyth Drive in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 63930 - Application M 1071/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: November 11, 2020 19 EASTVIEW CRESCENT - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two storey replacement dwelling with rear deck, pool and associated landscaping at 19 Eastview Crescent in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 62263 - Application #: 1027/19/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: December 17, 2020 50 HI MOUNT DRIVE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two storey replacement dwelling with integral garage, front porch and rear wood deck at 50 Hi Mount Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 63637 - Application #: 0785/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: August 24, 2020 15 CITATION DRIVE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a second storey addition to the existing single family dwelling at 15 Citation Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 63942 - Application #: 1101/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: November 30, 2020 THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a new wing to the existing hospital located at 2075 Bayview Avenue (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre) in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council). CFN: 63836 - Application #: 1042/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: October 30, 2020 3 OLD YONGE STREET - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two storey single family dwelling at 3 Old Yonge Street in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 57455 - Application #: 0227/171TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: December 3, 2020 UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a replacement wood retaining wall and adjacent asphalt walkway at 520 Sutherland Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council). CFN: 63658 - Application #: 0840/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: September 14, 2020 WYNFORD SOUTH C/O M&R PROPERTY MANAGEMENT - Don River Watershed The purpose is to repair and re -waterproof the intermediate and roof deck slabs of the existing parking garage at 45 Wynford Heights Crescent in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 63952 - Application #: 1145/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 25, 2020 14 CODSELL AVENUE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a one -storey front addition with front porch, basement walkout, rear wood deck and associated landscaping to the existing one -storey dwelling at 14 Codsell Avenue in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 63213 - Application #: 0449/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: May 25, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) CITY OF TORONTO - Highland Creek Watershed The purpose is to remove an existing 4200 mm by 2000 mm creek culvert and to construct a new pedestrian bridge at Thornton Creek, just south of Bennett Road and Woodgrove Drive, in the City of Toronto. In/near water works will occur as part of channel reconstruction. CFN: 59643 - Application #: 0501/181TOR Report Prepared by: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca For information contact: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca Date: December 14, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO - Waterfront Watershed The purpose is to install architectural fragments as sculptural installations at Location 14 at 201 Guildwood Parkway in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council). CFN: 63646 - Application #: 0803/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: August 31, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO - Highland Creek Watershed The purpose is to rehabilitate an exposed storm sewer outfall located on the eastern channel bank of Upper East Highland Creek, approximately 180 m downstream of the confluence of the Malvern Branch and Markham Branch, in the City of Toronto. CFN: 63788 - Application #: 0925/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Margie Akins, extension 5925, email margie.akins@trca.ca For information contact: Margie Akins, extension 5925, email margie.akins@trca.ca Date: October 21, 2020 10 CUDIA CRESCENT -Waterfront Watershed The purpose is to construct an in -ground pool and associated hard landscaping in the rear yard of the existing dwelling at 10 Cudia Crescent in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area). CFN: 63392 - Application #: 0613/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: July 16, 2020 10 MEADOWCLIFFE DRIVE - Waterfront Watershed The purpose is to complete the construction of a three-storey replacement dwelling with rear patios, in -ground swimming pool and associated landscaping at 10 Meadowcliffe Drive in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area). CFN: 63935 - Application #: 1085/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 10, 2020 47 FORBES ROAD - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct interior alterations to facilitate a secondary dwelling unit in the existing dwelling at 47 Forbes Road in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area). CFN: 63934 - Application #: 1084/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rap us@trca.ca Date: November 10, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 159 HUDSON DRIVE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct steps connecting to the existing deck, a flagstone landing and steps to the backyard at the rear of the existing single family dwelling at 159 Hudson Drive. The proposal also includes the replacement of landscape walls to the rear. CFN: 62884 - Application #: 0180/201TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: November 4, 2020 66 BRULE GARDENS - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a new two storey rear addition and deck to the existing two storey single family detached dwelling at 66 Brule Gardens in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 63224 - Application #: 0521/201TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: November 19, 2020 193 RIVERSIDE DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a dormer to the front of the two-storey single family dwelling at 193 Riverside Drive in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 63927 - Application #: 1067/201TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 11, 2020 7 GLEN EDEN CRESCENT - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a pool, associated hardscape and a hot tub, and to replace a rear landscape wall and steps at 7 Glen Eden Crescent in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). The proposal also involves minor site grading. CFN: 63839 - Application #: 1046/201TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 60 CAROLINE AVENUE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to underpin the existing basement in order to increase ceiling height at 60 Caroline Avenue in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 63838 - Application #: 1044/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rapus@trca.ca Date: November 4, 2020 312 RIVERSIDE DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to facilitate drainage improvements on the backyard by way of constructing a French drain and soakaway pit at 312 Riverside Drive in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). The proposal also involves minor site grading. CFN: 63928 - Application #: 1078/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rapus@trca.ca Date: November 10, 2020 35 WORTHINGTON CRESCENT - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct an in -ground pool and associated hardscape at 35 Worthington Crescent in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 63774 - Application #: 0946/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 WATERFRONT TORONTO - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct the new temporary and permanent plugs and marine structure to support the construction of the new Don River Valley System within the Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure (PLFPEI) Project. There are no in -water works associated with this project. CFN: 62155 - Application #: 1010/191TOR Report Prepared by: Renee Afoom-Boateng, extension 5714, email renee.afoom- boateng@trca.ca For information contact: Renee Afoom-Boateng, extension 5714, email renee.afoom- boateng@trca.ca Date: December 1, 2020 WATERFRONT TORONTO - Waterfront Watershed The purpose is to relocate the existing heritage building Fire Hall No. 30, a two storey brick building from its current location at 39 Commissioners Street to a suitable location about 25 m south (including new foundations, servicing and landscaping), to allow for the redevelopment of the new Commissioners Street within the Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure project. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 63605 - Application M 0837/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Renee Afoom-Boateng, extension 5714, email renee.afoom- boateng@trca.ca For information contact: Renee Afoom-Boateng, extension 5714, email renee.afoom- boateng@trca.ca Date: December 4, 2020 CITY OF VAUGHAN 528 ROYALPARK WAY - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 27 sq.m (288 sq.ft) swimming pool and associated pool patio and soft landscaping, a 6 sq.m (60 sq.ft) shed and a 0.2 metre to 0.5 metre landscape wall. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 528 Royalpark Way, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 63967 - Application M 1107/201VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: November 17, 2020 146 WILLIS ROAD AND 158 WILLIS ROAD - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the reconstruction of an existing single family dwelling, the construction of a 105.9 sq. m. (1,140 sq. ft.) two-storey addition to the dwelling and a 38.5 sq. m. (415 sq. ft.) garage, replacement of an existing deck and alterations to an existing accessory structure involving replacement of the existing roof. The subject property is located on land known municipally as 146 Willis Road and 158 Willis Road, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 62840 - Application M 0068/201VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: January 20, 2020 CITY OF VAUGHAN - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to widen Canada Company Avenue from Islington Avenue north to the cul-de- sac, in the City of Vaughan. The proposal includes widening of the existing roadway to create 3.0 m to 3.5 m wide lanes in each direction, site grading, removal and replacement of the road base, replacement of existing CSP culverts and construction of retaining walls. All in -water works will be undertaken in the dry. CFN: 62928 - Application M 0266/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca For information contact: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca Date: October 18, 2020 CITY OF VAUGHAN - Don River Watershed The purpose is to replace the existing deteriorated wooden pedestrian bridge with a pre- fabricated self -weathering steel bridge on new abutments located at 201 King High Drive near Dufferin Street and Center Street, in the City of Vaughan. All works will be undertaken in the dry. CFN: 63183 - Application M 0503/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca For information contact: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email man iru 1. islam@trca.ca Date: October 21, 2020 CITY OF VAUGHAN - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake emergency culvert rehabilitation works on an existing single span 3.15 m x 8.5 m concrete culvert on Teston Road located approximately 350 m east of Kipling Avenue, in the City of Vaughan. The proposed works include removal and replacement of existing deteriorated culvert soffit with a pre -cast soffit and patch repair and crack injection on existing walls. All the works will be undertaken in the dry. This permit is in accordance with TRCA Permission for Emergency Infrastructure Works Review Protocol (Authority Res. #A105/15). CFN: 63784 - Application M 0945/201VAUG Report Prepared by: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca For information contact: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca Date: November 17, 2020 FOUR SEASONS (PINE VALLEY) INC. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake site alteration works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River watershed in order to facilitate the placement of 15,000 cubic metres of fill. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 0 Teston Road, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 63750 - Application M 1106/201VAUG Report Prepared by: Stephen Bohan, extension 5743, email step hen. bohan@trca.ca For information contact: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca Date: November 19, 2020 HOWIE FLEISHER HOLDING INC. - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 36 sq.m (388 sq.ft) addition to an existing single family detached dwelling. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 20 Silver Fox Place, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 63912 - Application M 1061/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: November 4, 2020 HUMBERPLEX DEVELOPMENT INC. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the cleaning out of accumulated sediment from an existing stormwater management pond. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as Rainbow's End Rear, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 63696 - Application #: 0847/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: October 7, 2020 PINE VALLEY KLEINBURG HOMES LTD. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River watershed in order to facilitate final servicing and grading works associated with a draft approved plan of subdivision (19T -17V011). The subject site is located on lands known municipally as 6061 Rutherford Road, 6079 Rutherford Road, 134 Simmons Street and 140 Simmons Street, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 63975 - Application #: 1116/201VAUG Report Prepared by: Stephen Bohan, extension 5743, email step hen. bohan@trca.ca For information contact: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca Date: November 25, 2020 TOWN OF AJAX 28 MORLAND CRESCENT - Duffins Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct a pool, cabana and associated hard landscaping in the rear yard of the existing dwelling at 28 Morland Crescent in the Town of Ajax. CFN: 63686 - Application #: 1076/20/AJAX Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: November 9, 2020 53 5TH CONCESSION ROAD - Duffins Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct a new two storey single family dwelling with above grade basement, and rear inground pool with associated hardscaping on an existing vacant lot of record located at 53 5th Concession Road in the Town of Ajax. CFN: 59149 - Application #: 0013/18/AJAX Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: December 21, 2020 TOWN OF AJAX - Duffins Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct a new pedestrian bridge along the Lake Ontario shoreline at the mouth of Duffins Creek and reconfigure asphalt trails within Rotary Park located south of the Lake Driveway and Westney Road intersection, in the Town of Ajax. CFN: 60235 - Application #: 0928/181AJAX Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: December 8, 2020 TOWN OF CALEDON ALOHA INN LIMITED - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to replace two drive thru signs including pvc conduit and wiring located to the south of the existing building. The proposed works are associated with a municipal permit and located at 20 Queen Street North, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64036 - Application #: 1161/20/CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: December 2, 2020 4 BRUNO RIDGE DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 9.91 sq. m. (106.67 sq. ft.) addition to the rear west corner, 29.36 sq. m. (229.95 sq. ft.) second storey addition, 80.85 sq. m. (870.30 sq. ft.) rear covered patio area, to the existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 4 Bruno Ridge Drive, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64033 - Application #: 1141/201CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: November 24, 2020 CALEDON HILLS FELLOWSHIP BAPTIST CHURCH - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a second dwelling unit, a side entrance and a new window, located in the basement of the existing house. The proposed works also include a septic system located to the east of the existing storage building. The subject property is located at 16591 Airport Road, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 63901 - Application #: 1041/20/CAL Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: November 9, 2020 14377 CHINGUACOUSY ROAD - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to facilitate the construction of an in -ground pool, associated stone work and fence in the TRCA's regulated area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 14377 Chinguacousy Road in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 63902 - Application M 1052/201CAL Report Prepared by: Tychon Carter -Newman, extension 5936, email tychon.carter- newman@trca.ca For information contact: Tychon Carter -Newman, extension 5936, email tychon.carter- newman@trca.ca Date: November 4, 2020 33 BIRCHVIEW CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to facilitate the construction of a 31.6 sq.m. (340 sq. ft.) home addition in the TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed. The proposed works are located on lands known municipally as 33 Birchview Crescent in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64032 - Application M 1128/201CAL Report Prepared by: Tychon Carter -Newman, extension 5936, email tychon.carter- newman@trca.ca For information contact: Tychon Carter -Newman, extension 5936, email tychon.carter- newman@trca.ca Date: November 20, 2020 15606 DUFFY'S LANE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a 499.2 sq.m. (5,373.34 sq.ft.) 2 -storey replacement single family dwelling, a 3 -car attached garage, a patio and a septic system. The subject property is located at 15606 Duffy's Lane, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 63231 - Application M 0464/201CAL Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: November 5, 2020 3 PROCTOR AVENUE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to facilitate the development of a 48.4 sq. m. ground floor addition and a 9.2 sq. m. shed in the TRCA's regulated area of the Humber River Watershed. The subject lands are known municipally as 3 Proctor Avenue in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 63703 - Application #: 1004/20/CAL Report Prepared by: Tychon Carter -Newman, extension 5936, email tychon.carter- newman@trca.ca For information contact: Tychon Carter -Newman, extension 5936, email tychon.carter- newman@trca.ca Date: October 23, 2020 52 DEER RIDGE TRAIL - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed, in order to facilitate the development of a second dwelling unit and two new windows, located in the basement of an existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 52 Deer Ridge Trail, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 63919 - Application #: 1094/201CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: November 18, 2020 18 BLUEBERRY HILL COURT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within the TRCA Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 24 sq. m wooden pergola to the northwest of the existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 18 Blueberry Hill Court, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 63896 - Application #: 1037/201CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email and rea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: October 30, 2020 PROLOGIS CANADA/ UPS CANADA - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a guard house, car wash facility, and auto repair building on a recently approved industrial warehouse development at 12424 Dixie Road, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 63916 - Application #: 1054/20/CAL Report Prepared by: Jason Wagler, extension 5370, email jason.wagler@trca.ca For information contact: Jason Wagler, extension 5370, email jason.wagler@trca.ca Date: November 4, 2020 17483 HUMBER STATION ROAD - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a 600 sq.m. (6,463 sq.ft) 1 -storey single family dwelling, a 102 sq.m. (1,095 sq.ft.) attached garage, a walled garden, a septic system and a driveway. The proposed works are located at 17483 Humber Station Road, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 63708 - Application #: 0851/20/CAL Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: October 30, 2020 TOWN OF CALEDON - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to undertake road rehabilitation on Chinguacousy Road from King Street to 1.2 km north of King Street, in the Town of Caledon. This proposal includes replacing one existing cross culvert and four existing driveway culverts. CFN: 62297 - Application #: 0228/201CAL Report Prepared by: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca For information contact: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca Date: December 15, 2020 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE SAVENA COVE HOMES INC. - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Duffins Creek and Rouge River Watersheds in order to facilitate habitat restoration within draft approved plan of subdivision 19T(W)-17.002, which is located on lands known municipally as 12785 Ninth Line, in the Town of Whitchurch-StouffviIle. CFN: 63458 - Application #: 0701/20/WS Report Prepared by: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca For information contact: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca Date: August 6, 2020 TOWNSHIP OF ADJALA-TOSORONTIO 1270 CONCESSION ROAD 3 - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a 92.5 square metre addition to a dwelling, at 1270 Concession Road 3 in the Township of Adjala-Tosorontio. CFN: 63466 - Application #: 1003/20/ADJ Report Prepared by: Jason Wagler, extension 5370, email jason.wagler@trca.ca For information contact: Jason Wagler, extension 5370, email jason.wagler@trca.ca Date: October 23, 2020 PERMISSION FOR ROUTINE INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR RECEIPT — STAFF APPROVED AND ISSUED Permission for Routine Infrastructure Works, including Emergency Infrastructure Works permissions, are subject to authorization by staff designated as Enforcement Officers as per Authority Res. #A198/13 and #A103/15, respectively. All routine and emergency infrastructure works are located within a regulated area, generally within or adjacent to the hazard or natural feature and in the opinion of staff do not affect the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land. CITY OF BRAMPTON ALECTRA UTILITIES CORPORATION To undertake utility pole installation on Goreway Drive between Castlemore Road and Countryside Drive, in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by the City of Brampton. The purpose is to install hydro poles on Goreway Drive between Castlemore Road to Countryside Drive in the City of Brampton. The works are required for the implementation of the Goreway Drive road widening project (CFN 60020) which proposes that the segment of road be widened to a two land rural road to four lane urban road. CFN: 62298 - Application #: 0319/20/BRAM Report Prepared by: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca For information contact: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca Date: December 11, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 4598 Countryside Drive, approximately 250 metres east of The Gore Road, in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Brampton under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 4598 Countryside Drive, approximately 250 metres east of The Gore Road, in the City of Brampton. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63806 - Application #: 0965/201BRAM Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 13, 2020 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL To undertake drainage structure general maintenance on Queen Street East approximately 350m west of Highway 50, in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by the Regional Municipality of Peel. The purpose is to undertake test pit investigations in order to inspect an existing culvert located on Queen Street East, approximately 350m west of Highway 50, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 63857 - Application #: 0998/20/13RAM Report Prepared by: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca For information contact: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca Date: December 17, 2020 CITY OF MARKHAM ALECTRA UTILITIES CORPORATION To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway and undertake utility pole installation on Denison Street near Steelcase Road East, in the City of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by the City of Markham. The purpose is to undertake replacement of hydro poles, anchors and down guys within the existing road right of way (ROW) of Steelecase Road East and Denison Street east of Woodbine Avenue, in the City of Markham. No in -water works are within the scope of this project. CFN: 63598 - Application #: 0807/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gammanpila@trca.ca For information contact: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gammanpila@trca.ca Date: November 6, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within a new roadway as part of a subdivision development located 900 metres east of the intersection of Warden Avenue and 16th Avenue, in the City of Markham, Rouge River Watershed, as located on property owned by the City of Markham under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 '/< PE IP gas pipeline within a new subdivision (approved under TRCA permit C-190963) located east of the intersection of Warden Avenue and 16th Avenue in the City of Markham. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 62000 - Application #: 0893/19/MARK Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 3, 2020 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To undertake sewer and watermain or utility watercourse crossing by trenchless technology on Henderson Avenue and Glen Cameron Road, in the City of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Markham. The purpose is to undertake installation of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) conduit on the south side of Glen Cameron Road and east side of Henderson Avenue. The proposed works include installation of 2- 47.2 mm HDPE conduit and fibre optic cable through the conduit and two 762 mm X 1219 mm X 610 mm HDPE handwells. No in -water works are within the scope of this project. CFN: 63989 - Application #: 1121/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Nasim Shakouri, extension 5798, email nasim.shakouri@trca.ca For information contact: Nasim Shakouri, extension 5798, email nasim.shakouri@trca.ca Date: December 22, 2020 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 7153 Lancaster Avenue, located north of the intersection of Derry Road and Airport Road, in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Mississauga under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1/2 PE IP gas pipeline at 7153 Lancaster Avenue, located north of the intersection of Derry Road and Airport Road, in the City of Mississauga. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63880 - Application #: 1087120/MISS Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: December 2, 2020 CITY OF PICKERING CITY OF PICKERING To undertake road/pathway resurfacing or reconstruction along the west side of Whites Road, north of Finch Avenue, in the City of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Watershed, as located on property owned by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA); a private landowner for which a temporary easement has been obtained and on lands owned by the Regional Municipality of Durham. The purpose is to replace approximately 250 metres of an existing 1.5 metre wide sidewalk with a 2 metre sidewalk along the west side of Whites Road, starting approximately 350 metres north of Finch Avenue, in the City of Pickering. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63519 - Application #: 0737/20/PICK Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: December 17, 2020 CITY OF PICKERING To undertake structure maintenance to the existing eastern and western breakwater landforms located at the Frenchman's Bay harbour entrance, south east of the intersection of Bayly Street and Liverpool Road, in the City of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Watershed, as located on property owned by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority under management agreement with the City of Pickering. The purpose is to repair damage to existing eastern and western breakwater landforms located at the Frenchman's Bay harbour entrance, south east of the intersection of Bayly Street and Liverpool Road, in the City of Pickering. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63619 - Application #: 0996/20/PICK Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 5, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within a new residential development, northwest of the Altona Road and Finch Avenue intersection, in the City of Pickering, Petticoat Creek Watershed as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the Regional Municipality of Durham as per the franchise agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install NPS 2 and NPS 4 PE IP gas pipelines along various streets in a new residential development, northwest of the Altona Road and Finch Avenue intersection, in the City of Pickering. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63993 - Application #: 1167/201PICK Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: December 17, 2020 CITY OF RICHMOND HILL ALECTRA UTILITIES CORPORATION To undertake utility pole installation on Leslie Street from south of Major Mackenzie Drive to north of Elgin Mills Road, in the City of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by the Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to undertake removal and installation of hydro poles and anchors along Leslie Street from south of Major Mackenzie Drive to north of Elgin Mills Road. No in -water works are in the scope of this project. CFN: 63599 - Application #: 0805/201RH Report Prepared by: Nasim Shakouri, extension 5798, email nasim.shakouri@trca.ca For information contact: Nasim Shakouri, extension 5798, email nasim.shakouri@trca.ca Date: December 17, 2020 BELL CANADA To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway, undertake sewer and watermain or utility watercourse crossing by trenchless technology on 19th Avenue between Bayview Avenue and Leslie Street, in the City of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by the Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to undertake conduit installation under a watercourse at the intersection of 19th Avenue and Bayview Avenue; removal of Bell infrastructure along 19th Avenue between Bayview Avenue and Leslie Street and installation of aerial cable on hydro poles along the same alignment. There are no in -water works within the scope of this project. CFN: 63294 - Application #: 0596/20/RH Report Prepared by: Shirin Varzgani, extension 5785, email shirin.varzgani@trca.ca For information contact: Shirin Varzgani, extension 5785, email shirin.varzgani@trca.ca Date: November 30, 2020 CITY OF RICHMOND HILL To undertake off-line stormwater management pond maintenance on a Stormwater Management Facility (SWMF) located near Estate Garden Drive and Yonge Street, in the City of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Richmond Hill. The purpose is to rehabilitate #8-3 Mitchell Pond Stormwater Management Facility (SWMF) located near Estate Garden Drive and Yonge Street, in the City of Richmond Hill. The works will be undertaken in dry conditions. CFN: 63594 - Application #: 0795/20/RH Report Prepared by: Shirin Varzgani, extension 5785, email shirin.varzgani@trca.ca For information contact: Shirin Varzgani, extension 5785, email shirin.varzgani@trca.ca Date: December 4, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within future roadways as part of a new subdivision located southeast of the intersection of Bayview Avenue and 19th Avenue, in the City of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed, as located on property owned by the City of Richmond Hill under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install NPS 2 and NPS 4 PE IP gas pipelines on future roadways as part of a new subdivision located southeast of the intersection of Bayview Avenue and 19th Avenue in the City of Richmond Hill. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63862 - Application #: 1014/20/RH Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) CITY OF TORONTO To undertake structure maintenance on 67 Pottery Road, just east of Todmorden Mills Road, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Toronto and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority under Management Agreement with the City of Toronto. The purpose is to remove and replace an existing wooden stairway with a new pre -cast concrete staircase located at 67 Pottery Road, just east of Todmorden Mills Road, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 61812 - Application #: 0682/191TOR Report Prepared by: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca For information contact: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca Date: November 23, 2020 PARK LAWN (FCR) LP To undertake borehole investigations between Park Lawn Road, Legion Road North, and the railway, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Metrolinx and the City of Toronto. The purpose is to advance four (4) boreholes within TRCA's regulation limit for Mimico Creek to support the Transit Project Assessment Process for the proposed Park Lawn GO Station spanning across the Metrolinx Lake Shore West Corridor at Park Lawn Road in the City of Toronto. There are no in -water works involved within the scope of this project. CFN: 63611 - Application #: 0829/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Margie Akins, extension 5925, email margie.akins@trca.ca For information contact: Margie Akins, extension 5925, email margie.akins@trca.ca Date: November 3, 2020 ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS CANADA INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway on Humber Boulevard, between 121 Humber Boulevard to 105 Humber Boulevard, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to install new communication conduits and a new Rogers vault on Humber Boulevard, between 121 Humber Boulevard to 105 Humber Boulevard, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 62709 - Application #: 0064/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca Date: November 11, 2020 SUN -CANADIAN PIPE LINES COMPANY LIMITED To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway within a transmission corridor south of Skyway Avenue, west of Highway 27, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the properties owned by Molson Breweries Properties Limited, the Apostolic Catholic Assyrian Church of the East and Infrastructure Ontario. The purpose is to conduct an integrity dig to inspect and determine the condition of an existing pipeline within a transmission corridor south of Skyway Avenue, west of Highway 27, in the City of Toronto. No in -water works are within the scope of the project. CFN: 63153 - Application #: 0423/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca For information contact: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca Date: November 4, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) CITY OF TORONTO To undertake road/pathway resurfacing or reconstruction on Cummer Avenue, located between Beardmore Crescent and Craigmont Drive, in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to undertake road reconstruction on Cummer Avenue, located between Beardmore Crescent and Craigmont Drive, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 63626 - Application #: 0881/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca For information contact: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca Date: November 9, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 43 Alamosa Drive, located southwest of the intersection of Finch Avenue and Leslie Street, in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 43 Alamosa Drive, located southwest of the intersection of Finch Avenue and Leslie Street, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63871 - Application #: 1130/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 26. 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 28 Knightswood Road, located southeast of the intersection of York Mills Road and Yonge Street, in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 28 Knightswood Road, located southeast of the intersection of York Mills Road and Yonge Street, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63875 - Application #: 1064120/TOR Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 11 Hi Mount Drive, northwest of Leslie Street and Sheppard Avenue, in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 11 Hi Mount Drive, northwest of Leslie Street and Sheppard Avenue, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63883 - Application #: 1096/201TOR Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: December 2, 2020 ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS CANADA INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway on London Green Court, between 21 London Green Court and 15 London Green Court, in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to install new communication conduits and a new vault for Rogers Communications Canada Inc. on London Green Court, between 21 London Green Court and 15 London Green Court, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 62805 - Application #: 0097/201TOR Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca Date: November 10, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) CITY OF TORONTO To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway on Prudential Drive, west of Midland Avenue, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to reline an existing 200 mm diameter watermain on Prudential Drive, west of Midland Avenue, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 63805 - Application #: 0957/201TOR Report Prepared by: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca For information contact: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO To undertake road resurfacing and reconstruction, and watermain replacement within an existing roadway on Midland Avenue from Sheppard Avenue to South Shields Avenue and replace the existing watermain from Stubbswood Square to Huntingwood Drive, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to reconstruct and/or resurface the road on Midland Avenue from Sheppard Avenue to South Shields Avenue and replace the existing watermain from Stubbswood Square to Huntingwood Drive, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 63873 - Application #: 1049/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Margie Akins, extension 5925, email margie.akins@trca.ca For information contact: Margie Akins, extension 5925, email margie.akins@trca.ca Date: December 21, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO To undertake borehole investigations on 51 Beechgrove Drive, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to advance two (2) boreholes and install one (1) monitoring well within TRCAs regulation limit for Highland Creek to support the design of a future access road for the Highland Creek Treatment Plant property at 51 Beechgrove Drive in Toronto — Scarborough. There are no in -water works involved within the scope of this project. CFN: 63885 - Application #: 1091/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Margie Akins, extension 5925, email margie.akins@trca.ca For information contact: Margie Akins, extension 5925, email margie.akins@trca.ca Date: December 7, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 481 Guildwood Parkway, located approximately 45 metres west of Morningside Avenue, in the City of Toronto, Waterfront Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 481 Guildwood Parkway, located approximately 45 metres west of Morningside Avenue, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63867 - Application #: 1024/201TOR Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 13, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 121 Sylvan Avenue, approximately 190 metres west of Bethune Boulevard, in the City of Toronto, Waterfront Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 121 Sylvan Avenue, approximately 190 metres west of Bethune Boulevard in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63860 - Application #: 1008/201TOR Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 13, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 70 Par Avenue, in the City of Toronto, Highland Creek Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 70 Par Avenue in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63864 - Application #: 1022/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 13, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer and watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway on 10126 Sheppard Avenue East, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto as per the franchise agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 10126 Sheppard Avenue East, south-east of Heatherbank Trail, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64012 - Application #: 1187/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangel i@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangel i@trca.ca Date: December 21, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) CITY OF TORONTO To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway on Fernwood Park Avenue, between 2 Fernwood Park Avenue and the end of the cul-de-sac, in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to abandon and replace an existing 100 mm diameter iron watermain with a new 150 mm diameter PVC watermain on Fernwood Park Avenue, between 2 Fernwood Park Avenue and the end of the cul-de-sac, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 63870 - Application #: 1047/201TOR Report Prepared by: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca For information contact: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca Date: December 14, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 32 Killdeer Crescent, located approximately 150 metres east of Brentcliffe Road, in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 32 Killdeer Crescent, located approximately 150 metres east of Brentcliffe Road, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63872 - Application #: 1048/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 38 Rykert Crescent, northeast of Eglinton Avenue East and Laird Drive, in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 38 Rykert Crescent in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63876 - Application #: 1065/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance along the east side of Munition Street, immediately north of Commissioners Street, in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by the City of Toronto under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to excavate along the east side of Munition Street, immediately north of Commissioners Street, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63887 - Application #: 1109/201TOR Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: December 9, 2020 CITY OF VAUGHAN ALECTRA UTILITIES CORPORATION To undertake sewer and watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway on Teston Road from Pine Valley Drive to Weston Road, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by the Regional Municipality of York and the City of Vaughan. The purpose is to undertake removal and installation of hydro poles and anchors along Teston Road from west of Pine Valley Drive to Weston Road, in the City of Vaughan. No in -water works are within the scope of this project. CFN: 63891 -Application #: 1118/20/VAUG Report Prepared by: Nasim Shakouri, extension 5798, email nasim.shakouri@trca.ca For information contact: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca Date: January 5, 2021 CITY OF VAUGHAN To undertake off-line stormwater management pond maintenance on Vellore Woods Boulevard and Ashberry Boulevard near Sunview Drive, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Vaughan. The purpose is to undertake the clean out of the Sunview (72A) and Wildberry (72B) stormwater management ponds located adjacent to each other in Block 32, City of Vaughan. CFN: 63495 - Application #: 0649/20/VAUG Report Prepared by: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca For information contact: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca Date: November 2, 2020 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 8025 Jane Street, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Vaughan under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 ST YJ HP gas pipeline at 8025 Jane Street, in the City of Vaughan. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63888 - Application #: 1110/20/VAUG Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: December 3, 2020 ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS CANADA INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway on Confederation Parkway from Camden Drive to Ten Oaks Boulevard near Dufferin Street and Rutherford Road, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Vaughan. The purpose is to install 100 mm diameter high density polyethylene (HDPE) conduit within the road right-of-way (ROW) of Confederation Parkway, in the City of Vaughan. No in -water works are within the scope of this project. CFN: 63274 - Application #: 0516/201VAUG Report Prepared by: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca For information contact: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca Date: November 11, 2020 ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS CANADA INC. To undertake sewer and watermain or utility watercourse crossing by trenchless technology on Highway 27 from Nashville Road to Major Mackenzie Drive west, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by the Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to undertake installation of high density polyethylene (HDPE) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) conduits and Rogers devices on the west side of Highway 27 from Nashville Road to Major Mackenzie Drive West, in City of Vaughan. No in -water works are within the scope of this project. CFN: 63593 - Application #: 0800/20/VAUG Report Prepared by: Nasim Shakouri, extension 5798, email nasim.shakouri@trca.ca For information contact: Nasim Shakouri, extension 5798, email nasim.shakouri@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 90 Lakeview Avenue, located approximately 120 metres east of Preston Avenue, in the Town of Whitch urch-Stouffville, Rouge River Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 90 Lakeview Avenue, located approximately 120 metres east of Preston Avenue, in the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville. No in - water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63868 - Application #: 1025/20MS Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: November 13, 2020 TOWNSHIP OF KING ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 14380 Dufferin Street, located approximately 280 metres south of 16th Sideroad, in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed, as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the Township of King under Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 2 PE IP gas pipeline at 14380 Dufferin Street, located approximately 280 metres south of 16th Sideroad, in the Township of King. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63791 - Application #: 0938/20/KING Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: December 4, 2020 MINOR WORKS LETTER OF APPROVAL FOR RECEIPT — STAFF APPROVED AND ISSUED Permission for Minor Works Letter of Approval are issued for works located within a regulated area, adjacent to a natural feature or natural hazard, that do not affect the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land. Permissions include ancillary structures such as decks, garages, sheds, pools and minor fill placement/landscaping. CITY OF BRAMPTON 44 RHAPSODY CRESCENT To change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 38, Plan 43M-1975, (44 Rhapsody Crescent), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 63900 - Application #: 1040/20/13RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: November 2, 2020 124 DEGREY DRIVE To install a swimming pool on Lot 2, Plan 40M-2013, (124 Degrey Drive), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 63920 - Application #: 1103/20/BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: November 24, 2020 CITY OF MARKHAM 6806 14TH AVENUE To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Part Lot 6, Concession 9, (6806 14th Avenue), in the City of Markham, Rouge River Watershed. CFN: 63976 - Application #: 1160/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca Date: December 9, 2020 CITY OF PICKERING 651 ANNLAND STREET To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 25, Plan 407, (651 Annland Street), in the City of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Watershed. CFN: 63956 - Application #: 1175/20/PICK Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: December 21, 2020 CITY OF RICHMOND HILL 56 QUEENSMILL COURT To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Part 33, 34 Block 181, Plan 65R-10225, (56 Queensmill Court), in the City of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed. CFN: 63907 - Application #: 1057/20/RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: November 25, 2020 52 HILTS DRIVE To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 11, Plan 65M-4571, (52 Hilts Drive), in the City of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed. CFN: 63908 - Application #: 1058/201RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: December 4, 2020 78 PLOWMAN LANE To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on 78 Plowman Lane, in the City of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed. CFN: 63851 - Application #: 0986/201RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: November 10, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 47 BURNHAMTHORPE PARK BOULEVARD To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 21, Plan 2496, (47 Burnhamthorpe Park Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed. CFN: 63757 - Application #: 0891/201TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rapus@trca.ca Date: December 2, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 19 SWIFTDALE PLACE To undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 903, Plan 4760, (19 Swiftdale Place), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed. CFN: 63834 - Application #: 1029/201TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: November 3, 2020 129COLDSTREAM AVENUE To install a swimming pool, undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads), construct a non - habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft), construct a ground floor addition up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) and construct a ground floor addition or structure greater than 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) but less than 150 sq. m (1614 sq. ft) on Part Lot 260, Plan M-87, (129 Coldstream Avenue), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed. CFN: 63933 - Application #: 1080/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: November 10, 2020 20 CROSSBURN DRIVE To construct a ground floor addition or structure greater than 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) but less than 150 sq. m (1614 sq. ft) and change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 10, Plan 5665, (20 Crossburn Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed. CFN: 62221 - Application #: 1042/19/TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rapus@trca.ca Date: October 29, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 3 VALHALLA BOULEVARD To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) and construct a ground floor addition or structure greater than 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) but less than 150 sq. m (1614 sq. ft) on Lot 85, Plan 1902, (3 Valhalla Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed. CFN: 64058 - Application #: 1162/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: December 10, 2020 143 EAST AVENUE To construct a ground floor addition up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 129, Plan M-1983, (143 East Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed. CFN: 63950 - Application #: 1137/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: December 1, 2020 70 PAR AVENUE To undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) on Lot 467, Plan 5053, (70 Par Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed. CFN: 63826 - Application #: 1010/20tTOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 3, 2020 1 BRODERICK PLACE To undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) on Lot 1, Plan 66M-2457, (1 Broderick Place), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Don River Watershed. CFN: 63929 - Application #: 1069/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 9, 2020 5290 LAWRENCE AVENUE EAST To undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 8, Plan 3167, (5290 Lawrence Avenue East), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed. CFN: 63824 - Application #: 1017/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: November 30, 2020 CITY OF VAUGHAN 93 ALISTAIR CRESCENT To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 69, Plan 65M-9639, 93 Alistair Crescent, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 63977 - Application #: 1126/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: November 25, 2020 49 KAIA COURT To install a swimming pool on 49 Kaia Court, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed. CFN: 63846 - Application #: 0977/201VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh.razavi@trca. ca Date: October 29, 2020 83 HARMONIA CRESCENT To install a swimming pool and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 61, Plan 65M-2156, 83 Harmonia Crescent, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 63567 - Application #: 1032/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: November 10, 2020 1 MARMOT COURT To install a swimming pool and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 17, Concession 2, 1 Marmot Court, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed. CFN: 63913 - Application #: 1062/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: November 19, 2020 35 MARYWOOD COURT To undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 37, Plan 65M-2852, 35 Marywood Court, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 63565 - Application #: 1034/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: November 10, 2020 67 HOPEWELL STREET To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 82, Plan 65M-4374, 67 Hopewell Street, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 63853 - Application M 1001/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: November 4, 2020 152 HEINTZMAN CRESCENT To install a swimming pool on Lot 53, Plan 65M, 152 Heintzman Crescent, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed. CFN: 63847 - Application M 0978/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: October 29, 2020 82 RUMSEY ROAD To install a swimming pool, undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 26, Plan 65M-4091, 82 Rumsey Road, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed. CFN: 63968 - Application M 1093/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh.razavi@trca. ca Date: November 25, 2020 20 BIG ROCK DRIVE To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 12, Plan 195, 20 Big Rock Drive, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed. CFN: 63566 - Application M 1033/201VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: November 10, 2020 TOWN OF CALEDON 2685686 ONTARIO INC. To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 22, Concession 1 ALBION Part 2 Plan 43R4447, (16301 Airport Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 2685686 Ontario Inc. CFN: 64031 -Application #: 1139/20/CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: November 25, 2020 38 CONNAUGHT CRESCENT To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 40, Plan C12, (38 Connaught Crescent), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 63904 - Application M 1053/20/CAL Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: November 18, 2020 19606 MOUNTAINVIEW ROAD To install a swimming pool and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 22, Concession 5, (19606 Mountainview Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64029 - Application M 1179/20/CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: December 9, 2020 1 CEDAR ALLAN PLACE To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 14, Plan 43M-1837, (1 Cedar Allan Place), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 63723 - Application #: 0971/20/CAL Report Prepared by: Jason Wagler, extension 5370, email jason.wagler@trca.ca For information contact: Jason Wagler, extension 5370, email jason.wagler@trca.ca Date: November 10, 2020 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE 93 PARK DRIVE NORTH To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Part Lot 1, Concession 9, (93 Park Drive North), in the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, Duff ins Creek Watershed. CFN: 63978 - Application #: 1159/20/WS Report Prepared by: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca Date: December 10, 2020 196 RICHARD UNDERHILL AVENUE To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 184, Plan 65M-4208, (196 Richard Underhill Avenue), in the Town of Whitch urch-StouffviIle, Rouge River Watershed. CFN: 63727 - Application #: 0961/20/WS Report Prepared by: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Lam, extension 5306, email andrea.lam@trca.ca Date: November 30, 2020 TOWNSHIP OF KING 31 RIA COURT To undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 26, Plan 65M4497, (31 Ria Court), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 63849 - Application #: 0999/201KING Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: November 9, 2020 12 AUSTIN RUMBLE COURT To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 2, Plan 65M- 4270, (12 Austin Rumble Court), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 63982 - Application #: 1158/20/KING Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: December 11, 2020 PERMITS AFTER THE FACT / RESOLUTION OF VIOLATIONS FOR RECEIPT — STAFF APPROVED AND ISSUED Permission for works undertaken without the benefit of a TRCA permit in a regulated area, where such works comply with TRCA policies and procedures, are considered permits after the fact and subject to an additional administrative fee. CITY OF BRAMPTON 15 TOVEY TERRACE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to recognize an as -built below grade entrance associated with a basement apartment in an existing single detached dwelling within a Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as at 15 Tovey Terrace, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 63970 - Application #: 1095/20/BRAM Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: December 11, 2020 CITY OF MARKHAM 4438 ELGIN MILLS ROAD EAST - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Rouge River Watershed to legalize a replacement pool, retaining walls, upper deck, lower deck, landing deck and associated stairs in the rear of an existing single detached dwelling located at 4438 Elgin Mills Road East, in the City of Markham. The described works were constructed without TRCA or municipal permits. As such, the applicant has paid double the application fee as required for voluntary compliance related to resolution of a violation of Ontario Regulation 166/06. CFN: 61964 - Application #: 0768/19/MARK Report Prepared by: Linda Bui, extension 5289, email linda.bui@trca.ca For information contact: Linda Bui, extension 5289, email linda.bui@trca.ca Date: December 15, 2020 CITY OF PICKERING 932 VISTUAL DRIVE - Frenchman's Bay Watershed The purpose is to legalize an inground pool, associated hardscaping, and basement walkout at the rear of an existing one storey residential dwelling located at 932 Vistula Drive in the City of Pickering. CFN: 63689 - Application #: 1083/201PICK Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 PASTOR HUBERT GROVES (JUNIOR) - Petticoat Creek Watershed The purpose is to legalize the regrading and placement of fill at 67 Finch Avenue in the City of Pickering. CFN: 63677 - Application #: 0897/20/PICK Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: December 8, 2020 883 BAYLAWN DRIVE - Frenchman's Bay Watershed The purpose is to legalize a retaining wall extension, replacement deck extension, and minor grading in the rear of an existing one storey single family detached dwelling located at 883 Baylawn Drive in the City of Pickering. CFN: 63679 - Application #: 0916/20/PICK Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: January 5, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 12 STRATH HUMBER COURT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to acknowledge reconstruction of the existing stairs and terraced retaining walls in the rear yard of the existing single family detached dwelling at 12 Strath Humber Court in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York). CFN: 63550 - Application #: 0725/201TOR Report Prepared by: Nicole Moxley, extension 5968, email nicole.moxley@trca.ca For information contact: Nicole Moxley, extension 5968, email nicole.moxley@trca.ca Date: December 12, 2020 6 EDGEBROOK DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to legalize after the fact a pool, associated hardscaping and pool cabana at 6 Edgebrook Drive in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 63939 - Application #: 1098/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rapus@trca.ca Date: November 26, 2020 200 RUSSELL HILL ROAD - Don River Watershed The purpose is to acknowledge the construction of a new 5 -storey multi -unit residential building at 200 Russell Hill Road in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York). CFN: 63760 - Application #: 0894/201TOR Report Prepared by: Nicole Moxley, extension 5968, email nicole.moxley@trca.ca For information contact: Nicole Moxley, extension 5968, email nicole.moxley@trca.ca Date: December 17, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 14 LADYSHOT CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to legalize a rear wood deck that replaced an existing shed, landscaping and the replacement of a stone retaining wall in the backyard at 14 Ladyshot Crescent in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). The proposal also includes the construction of a new basement walkout to the rear of the existing dwelling. A portion of the works have been completed without the benefit of a TRCA permit. CFN: 63667 - Application #: 0872/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: November 5, 2020 77 CITATION DRIVE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to legalize the rear yard landscaping at 77 Citation Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 63827 - Application #: 1011/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: October 26, 2020 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 63 COE HILL DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to legalize an existing wood deck at 63 Coe Hill Drive in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). The deck over the rear garage is to be removed. CFN: 63822 - Application #: 0987/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: October 29, 2020 CITY OF VAUGHAN 115 HAZELRIDGE COURT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to recognize an existing 60 sq.m (648 sq.ft) swimming pool, associated deck area and a set of armour stone retaining walls that were constructed without the approval of TRCA. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 115 Hazelridge Court, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 61644 - Application #: 0581/19/VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: June 17, 2019 TOWN OF AJAX NWEKE GROUP INC. - Carruthers Creek Watershed The purpose is to legalize fill placement and regrading at 2252 Salem Road North in the Town of Ajax. CFN: 63690 - Application M 1135/20/AJAX Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: January 5, 2021 TOWN OF CALEDON 2530650 ONTARIO INC. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to recognize the construction of two 22.73 sq.m. and 28.16 sq.m. (244.66 sq.ft. and 303.11 sq.ft.) horse run-in sheds, a 6.33 sq.m. (68.13 sq.ft.) dog house and a 67.68 sq.m. (728.50 sq.ft.) storage building located to the north of the existing riding arena, within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed. The purpose of this application is also to recognize the development of a helipad located to the south west of the existing pond. The works were constructed at 17084 Duffy's Lane, in the Town of Caledon without the benefit of TRCA or municipal permits. CFN: 63897 - Application M 0995/20/CAL Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: December 2, 2020 8396 FINNERTY SIDEROAD - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to facilitate, within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed, the reconstruction of a replacement driveway on lands known municipally as 8396 Finnerty Sideroad, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 63848 - Application M 1036/201CAL Report Prepared by: Anthony Syhlonyk, extension 5272, email anthony.syhlonyk@trca.ca For information contact: Jason Wagler, extension 5370, email jason.wagler@trca.ca Date: October 30, 2020 CLOSED SESSION ITEM ADVANCING PICKERING WATERFRONT TRAIL CONNESTIVITY AND SHORELINE WORKS THROUGH A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CITY OF PICKERING AND A VALUE- ADDED DISPOSITION Moved by: Gordon Highet Seconded by: Joanne Dies THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff be directed to take the necessary action in accordance with the confidential Board of Directors direction. CARRIED ADJOURNMENT ON MOTION by Anthony Perruzza, the meeting adjourned at 10:11 a.m., on January 15, 2021. Jennifer Innis Chair /am John MacKenzie Chief Executive Officer