Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-05-14_Minutes_Executive_CommitteeToronto and Region Conservation Authority Executive Committee Meeting was held via videoconference, on Friday, May 14, 2021 pursuant to section C.12 of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Board of Directors Administrative By -Law. The Chair Jennifer Innis, called the meeting to order at 9:32 a.m. PRESENT Jennifer Innis Chair Jack Heath Vice -Chair Ronald Chopowick Member Joanne Dies Member Xiao Han Member Gordon Highet Member Linda Jackson Member Anthony Perruzza Member ABSENT Dipika Damerla Member Jennifer Drake Member Paula Fletcher Member Maria Kelleher Member The Chair recited the Acknowledgement of Indigenous Territory. MINUTES Moved by: Joanne Dies Seconded by: Ronald Chopowick THAT the Minutes of Executive Committee meeting, held on April 9, 2021 be approved. CARRIED RES.#B41/21 - Moved by: Seconded by: MINUTES Linda Jackson Ronald Chopowick THAT the Minutes of the Special Executive Committee meeting, held on April 30, 2021 be approved. CARRIED 1 Section I — Items for the Board of Directors Action RES.#B42/21 - 2022 PRELIMINARY MUNICIPAL BUDGET Update on the 2022 preliminary municipal levies and submission process. Moved by: Xiao Han Seconded by: Jack Heath THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) 2022 preliminary municipal levy submissions for the regional municipalities of Durham, Peel and York, and the City of Toronto, be consistent with the anticipated 2022 operating and capital funding envelopes proposed for TRCA in the 2021 budget cycle; THAT preliminary operating levy targets be set at: Durham Region 2.9%, Peel Region 3.0%, York Region 3.1% and City of Toronto at 7.1%; AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff be directed to submit the preliminary 2022 municipal estimates and multi-year funding requests to the regional municipalities of Durham, Peel and York, and the City of Toronto, in accordance with their respective submission schedules. CARRIED BACKGROUND The internal process for starting the 2022 budget estimates has commenced. TRCA's partner municipalities require that TRCA provide 1 year and 4 -year capital budget projections and each municipality has its own requirements and format for this information. Attachment 1 outlines the forecast for projects and programs funded though capital levy in the City of Toronto and the regional municipalities of Durham, Peel and York. TRCA staff regularly consult with partner municipality staff to: ensure that there is alignment on objectives and deliverables; to avoid duplication of effort; to coordinate activities and procurements to realize maximum value and efficiency; and to report on the achievement of project deliverables. Attachment 1 provides a summary of the anticipated distribution of funding at the Service Area level by regional municipality. Detailed information sheets on each TRCA project and program are available to members upon request. RATIONALE Municipal Capital Fundina Regional Municipality of Durham Durham Region budget guidelines will be provided to TRCA later this year. TRCA will be requesting a 2022 funding envelope in the amount of $1.206 million, which compares to $1.127 million in 2021. The increase reflects a 7% adjustment on the base; rationale for the adjustment includes inflation (2%) and the transition of core TRCA programs (Watershed Planning and Reporting, Regional Watershed Monitoring and Ecosystem Science) to a formula -based funding model that had been previously covered through contract services for specific Durham projects. This funding is distributed on a land area basis for programs that are jurisdiction wide. TRCA will work with the Region in creating a 2022 budget that is sustainable and realistic and will address the core requirements needed to continue to deliver key services across the jurisdiction. Regional Municipality of Peel Annually, Peel Region guidelines provide an approximate 3% increase to the funding envelope from the previous year. Peel Region's 2022 funding envelope is anticipated to be in the amount of $18.020 million, which compares to $17.585 million in 2021. The preliminary budget reflects a 2.5% increase on the base, and it is consistent with the 2022 targets contained in the 2021 submission. City of Toronto City of Toronto guidelines for TRCA established during the 2018 — 2027 capital budget cycle provide for a 2022 capital funding envelope in the amount of $19.615 million, which compares to an approved $18.197 million in 2020. The 7% increase in 2022 funding is primarily driven by enhanced funding in the water risk management service area (additional $1.3 million) to support the Valley Erosion Hazard Program and the Waterfront Major Maintenance Program. City of Toronto capital funding is supported by debt financing and the Water Rate. Regional Municipality of York York Region's 2022 funding envelope is anticipated to be in the amount of $5.162 million, which compares to $5.655 million in 2021. The 8.7% decrease on the base is due to the Erosion Monitoring and Maintenance Program. Funding for this program was enhanced over a ten-year period beginning in 2021, and a large allocation of the total enhanced funding was approved for the 2021 funding envelope ($0.5 million). Operating Lew The operating levy anticipated funding envelopes for the regional municipalities of Durham and Peel are in line with the amounts proposed in the multi-year targets for TRCA, and approximate recent historical average increases. The operating levy anticipated funding envelope for the City of Toronto is in line with the phased increases in contributions approved in 2020: $243,000 in 2020, $728,000 in 2021 and $728,000 in 2022. With the City of Toronto's catch-up payments now confirmed, the regional imbalance of TRCA's non -CVA levy is now with the Region of York. To address the remaining funding imbalance, York Region's funding envelope would require an approximate increase of $450,000. In 2020, an approach similar to that of the City of Toronto's was presented to the Region, with phased -in contributions as follows: $75,000 in 2021, $275,000 in 2022 and $475,000 in 2023. Due to the financial impacts of COVID-19, York Region staff requested a delay in the commencement of the phased -in approach. TRCA will continue to work with the Region of York to establish a 2022 budget that is sustainable and realistic while working to address the imbalance. Table 1: 2022 Preliminary Operatinq LevV Partner Municipality 2021 Operating Levy $ Preliminary 2022 Operating Levy $ 2022 Change $ 2022 Change /o Ad'ala-Tosorontio 919 950 31 3.4% Durham 612,000 630,000 18,000 2.9% Mono 1,686 1,726 40 2.4% Peel 1,983,996 2,043,515 59,519 3.0% Toronto 10,197,912 10,925,412 727,500 7.1% York 3,495,800 3,605,800 110,000 3.1% TOTAL 16,292,313 17,207,403 915,090 5.6% Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategy set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 9 — Measure performance DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA's 2022 budget is anticipated to be finalized in the fourth quarter of 2021 and will include municipal levy projects and programs as anticipated to be approved by the respective participating municipalities. Staff will make a presentation on key aspects of the 2022 budget in the fourth quarter of 2021, prior to anticipated municipal council approvals by the end of the first quarter of 2022. Report prepared by: Jenifer Moravek, extension 5659 Emails: jenifer.moravek(a)trca.ca For Information contact: Michael Tolensky, extension 5965 Emails: michael.tolensky(a).trca.ca Date: April 16, 2021 Attachments: 1 Attachment 1: Preliminary 2022 Four -Year Capital Forecast Attachment 1: Preliminary 2022 Four -Year Capital Forecast 2021 Approved 2022 2023 2024 2025 Regional Municipality of Durham Details 1 Watershed Studies and Strategies Total 2 Water Risk Management Total 3 Regional Biodiversity Total 4 Greenspace Securement and Management Total 5 Tourism and Recreation Total 6 Planning and Development Total 7 Education and Outreach Total 8 Sustainable Communities Total 9 Corporate Services Total Total Capital Regional Municipality of Peel Details 1 Watershed Studies and Strategies Total 2 Water Risk Management Total 3 Regional Biodiversity Total 4 Greenspace Securement and Management Total 5 Tourism and Recreation Total 6 Planning and Development Total 7 Education and Outreach Total 8 Sustainable Communities Total 9 Corporate Services Total Total Capital 11,000 94,000 94,000 98,000 101,000 335,000 335,000 338,000 342,000 342,000 465,000 458,000 463,000 469,000 475,000 17,800 17,800 17,800 17,800 17,800 96,000 97,000 100,000 101,000 104,000 14,200 14,200 14,200 14,200 14,200 106,200 108,200 106,000 108,000 110,000 81,971 81,900 84,700 84,700 84,700 1,127,171 1,206,100 1,217,700 1,234,700 1,248,700 2021 Approved 2022 2023 2024 2025 563,000 590,000 603,000 622,000 641,000 2,366,000 2,408,000 2,466,000 2,520,000 2,575,000 4,414,000 4,505,000 4,598,000 4,728,000 4,854,000 1,551,900 1,597,900 1,645,900 1,694,900 1,744, 900 968,000 997,000 1,027,000 1,058,000 1,090,000 446,500 458,500 458,500 470,500 470,500 1,840,000 1,879,000 1,919,000 1,960,000 2,003,000 3,468,400 3,569,400 3,659,000 3,764,000 3,874,000 1,966,800 2,015,800 2,077,700 2,129,700 2,183,700 17,584,600 18,020,600 18,454,100 18,947,100 19,436,100 Attachment 1: Preliminary 2022 Four -Year Capital Forecast City of Toronto Details 2021 Approved 2022 2023 2024 2025 1 Watershed Studies and Strategies Total 252,000 268,000 268,000 274,000 279,000 2 Water Risk Management Total 12,105,000 13,423,000 17,448,000 14,049,000 10,649,000 3 Regional Biodiversity Total 1,630,000 1,655,000 1,669,000 1,679,000 1,680,000 4 Greenspace Securement and Management Total 64,300 64,300 64,300 64,300 64,300 5 Tourism and Recreation Total 641,000 641,000 641,000 641,000 641,000 6 Planning and Development Total 321,100 321,100 321,100 321,100 321,100 7 Education and Outreach Total 147,000 180,000 189,000 189,000 189,000 8 Sustainable Communities Total 1,173,600 1,199,600 1,184,400 1,299,400 1,400,400 9 Corporate Services Total 1,863,000 1,863,000 1,927,200 1,927,200 1,927,200 Total Capital 18,197,000 19,615,000 23,712,000 20,444,000 17,151,000 Regional Municipality of York Details 2021 Approved 2022 2023 2024 2025 1 Watershed Studies and Strategies Total 197,000 218,000 218,000 227,000 233,000 2 Water Risk Management Total 2,442,000 1,904,000 2,173,000 1,955,000 1,887,000 3 Regional Biodiversity Total 1,190,000 1,197,000 1,209,000 1,225,000 1,240,000 4 Greenspace Securement and Management Total 168,000 171,000 174,000 177,000 180,000 5 Tourism and Recreation Total 249,000 254,000 259,000 264,000 269,000 6 Planning and Development Total 110,200 110,200 110,200 110,200 110,200 7 Education and Outreach Total 187,000 191,000 195,000 200,000 205,000 8 Sustainable Communities Total 413,100 411,200 387,100 390,000 399,000 9 Corporate Services Total 698,700 706,000 728,100 730,100 730,100 Total Capital 5,655,000 5,162,400 5,453,400 5,278,300 5,253,300 Total Capital All Regions 42,563,771 44,004,100 48,837,200 45,904,100 43,089,100 RES.#B43/21 - DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES - PLANNING AND PERMITTING ADMINISTRATIVE FEES UPDATE 2021 Assessment of Cost Recovery and workload volume supporting the 2021- 2022 Planning, Permitting and Infrastructure Planning Fee Schedules. Moved by: Xiao Han Seconded by: Jack Heath THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff establish Fee Schedules for all plan review services that aim to achieve a 100% cost recovery target for applicable planning and permitting review functions within the Development Planning and Permits and Infrastructure Planning and Permits business units; WHEREAS TRCA follows the guidelines from the Provincial Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry - Policies and Procedures for Charging of Conservation Authority Fees and TRCA's Fee Policy Guideline 2009, which is the relevant guiding document at this time; WHEREAS TRCA staff have committed to monitor trends in the volume of submissions received annually, our level of service, and cost recovery and report back to the Board of Directors on a regular basis on the status of cost recovery and the need to update fees; WHEREAS the last planning and permits fee update was approved by the Board of Directors in February of 2018, which provided fee schedules for 2018-2019, and has remained in place since that time; WHEREAS an update to the fee schedules and a comprehensive fee review would otherwise have been completed in 2020, if not for the significant impacts that the COVID- 19 global pandemic has had on all sectors, including those related to planning and permitting, as well as the review of Conservation Authorities Act that was underway at that time; WHEREAS it is TRCA staff's opinion that the 2017 amendments to the Conservation Authorities Act regarding fees, are not yet in force, do not change TRCA's ability to collect fees for the planning and permitting services that we provide; WHEREAS TRCA's planning, permitting and infrastructure planning fee schedules are now out of date, and are no longer accounting for the increased inflationary costs of delivering the services; AND WHEREAS TRCA has discussed the proposed new fee schedules with the Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) and has considered their recommendations prior to seeking Board of Directors approval; THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the fee adjustment proposal as outlined within this report be approved, and that staff be directed to utilize the new 2021- 2022 fee schedules, effective June 1, 2021. CARRIED BACKGROUND Through its Planning and Permitting section, TRCA regulates development in valley and stream corridors, wetlands, flood and erosion prone areas, and along the Lake Ontario shoreline, and reviews and comments on development proposals and applications within or adjacent to these natural areas. By doing so, TRCA aims to prevent, eliminate, or reduce the risk to life and property from flooding, erosion and slope instability, and to encourage the protection and enhancement of natural systems. In parallel with our permitting responsibilities, TRCA Planning and Permits provides municipalities with science -based, technical and policy advice on applications made under the Planning Act, the Environmental Assessment Act, and other applicable legislation. Through this function TRCA assists our municipal partners, the development community, and the public to prevent and mitigate natural hazard -based risks, while maintaining and where possible enhancing the health of our watersheds. TRCA staff consider this function to be a core, and mandated service. Planning and Permits is comprised of two business units — Development Planning and Permits (DPP) and Infrastructure Planning and Permits (IPP). DPP principally processes applications with private sector proponents. IPP principally processes applications with a public sector proponent. In a similar fashion to our municipal partners, and in accordance with the Policies and Procedures provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF), TRCA Planning and Permits section assesses fees for our services. DPP attains fees from the proponents for our review of planning and permit applications. IPP attains fees through both service level agreements with some of the partners, and through fees for service from the others. These fees are to recover the costs of delivering the services, and historically we have recovered less than 100% of the actual cost. Planning and Permits staff received direction from TRCA's Board of Directors in 2011 to achieve full cost recovery for eligible Planning and Permits services. In the subsequent fee schedule updates, incremental adjustments were made to the Planning and Permitting fees. Maintaining full cost recovery is an on-going process, as the costs of providing the services increase annually, and file volumes are not within the control of Planning and Permits staff and are subject to change. Based upon monitoring revenues, costs, and file volumes, and adapting the fee schedules, 100% cost recovery was functionally attained in 2015 and was maintained through 2018 by both groups. For reasons identified below, DPP was not able to achieve 100% cost recovery in 2019 but did achieve full cost recovery in 2020. Full cost recovery was maintained in both years by IPP. In 2019 and 2020, the volume of new development planning applications dipped notably, while permit application volumes remained high, as reflected in Attachment 1. In 2019, as a result of receiving fewer development applications, revenues for DPP fell short of the budgets for planning and permitting services. The reduced revenues in 2019 and 2020 have been most pronounced in DPP's permitting revenues, despite the high volume of permits received. In 2020 DPP met and slightly exceeded its overall budget target based upon achieving significant reductions to expenses below 2020 budgeted amounts and based upon an increase (over 2019) in the number and associated revenues from planning applications. RATIONALE In order to keep our fee schedules up to date, TRCA Planning and Permitting staff typically review and update our fee schedules every two years. The last fee review was completed in early 2018 and the fee schedule was to be in place for 2018 and 2019. Under normal circumstances, an update to the fee schedules would have occurred in 2020. As a result of the on-going review of the Conservation Authorities Act, and the unknown impact of any changes upon our ability to collect fees for planning and permitting services, as well as the impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic on all sectors, a review of the fees was not completed in 2020. An update to TRCA's fees is now overdue, to incorporate a cost -of -living increase, as well as to support the anticipated costs of the Planning Application, Review and Enforcement System (PARES) initiative, which is necessary for TRCA to achieve the file processing and tracking capabilities consistent with our municipal partners. 2021-2022 Fee Review The 2021-2022 fee review has three principal purposes: 1. Maintain Board of Directors' direction with respect to achieving cost recovery; 2. Incorporate an inflationary (cost -of -living) increase - 5% is proposed (2.5% increase for 2 years) to cover annual increases in the cost of staffing and benefits; 3. Where possible, address funding needs associated with PARES; Development Planning and Permits (DPP) has three active budgets and accounts associated with Planning, Permitting and Major Projects. As noted, the overall volume of planning applications has been down in 2019 and 2020 compared to previous years. However, despite the lower numbers, based upon year-end numbers, planning fees received in 2020 met and slightly exceeded the 2020 budget for this account, and offset the deficiencies in the permitting account. The volume of permit applications received remains high — 2020 generated the third highest number of permit applications on record (1229 permit applications received). However, permit revenues fell short of the 2020 budget. From reviewing our permitting data for 2013-2020, it is clear that permit related revenues have fallen short of the target in several years between 2013- 2020. Over that period, the amount budgeted has increased significantly, however, the revenues have not similarly increased. Looking at a finer grain of detail, the majority (approximately 75%) of permits processed by DPP are minor in nature - single family residential permits in the minor and standard categories (see Attachment 2). Across the categories very few of the permits issued are Major or Complex permits. This is significant, as key changes to the permitting fee schedule in 2018 were modifications to the subdivision/commercial/industrial fee categories to better reflect the scope of work involved in the review. The anticipated impact of these changes was, of course, based upon the projected number of applications, using the 2016 index year. In 2019 and 2020, as noted above, the numbers of these larger -scale applications have been down — likely as a result of Covid complications and associated shut- downs. Analysis Cost of Living Increase Based upon the revenues and expenditures of DPP and IPP from 2015, both business units are substantially achieving and maintaining full cost recovery for the services offered. As revenues of these business units (and DPP in particular) are based upon the number of applications received — which is not within our control, there is some annual variation. However, the budgeting and cost recovery has been very successful and accurate as possible in achieving full cost recovery, without recovering more than the cost of delivering the service. In order to maintain this, our fees need to be updated to incorporate a 2021-2022 cost -of -living increase to address the annual inflationary increases to the costs of delivering the services. Consistent with the past fee schedule updates, staff are proposing to incorporate a cost -of -living increase - 5% is proposed (based upon a 2.5% increase for each of the two years that the fee schedules will be in effect) to cover annual increases in the cost of staffing, benefits, and expenses. These changes represent the majority of the changes to the fee schedules that are being proposed by staff at this time. The proposed revised fee schedules, with the proposed changes outlined, are included in Attachments 3, 4 and 5 to this report. Other Category Specific Changes Staff have looked at permitting revenues in relation to the current budget to determine whether the Permitting budget needs to be adjusted, or whether there is a misalignment between the fee schedule (i.e. amount charged for permitting services), the revenues attained, and the cost of delivering the services. Based upon the information available at present, the permitting budget appears to be appropriate. Through looking at budget information (revenues to expenses) over the past several years, we have confirmed that the amount of time being spent on permit files appears to be approximately 30% — i.e. approximately 30% of the workload attributed to permitting matters, with planning matters (in broad terms) taking approximately 70% of the time. Based upon a 30% time allocation to permitting services, the existing permitting budget is appropriate — i.e., 1.95 million — representing 30% of the total DPP budget. As such, modifications to the permitting fee schedule should be considered to bring future revenues up to the cost of delivering the services. From reviewing file volumes for 2013 to 2020, with specific emphasis on 2019 and 2020 in the review, it is apparent that the vast majority of planning and permitting files that are received by TRCA are being assessed the minor (and to a lesser degree the standard) category. And, while that may be generally appropriate based upon the complexity of applications received, it appears that a higher fee category may have been warranted for some of the files given the scope of work indicated. This appears to be applicable to both planning and permitting fees. Given this, through this fee review, the following is also being considered: 1. The definitions and supporting text in the fee schedule are being revised to provide greater clarity. 2. Some gaps between fee categories in the fee schedule are too large. Concept Developments, as follows, are an example: Concept Development/ Minor $370 Property Inquiry - Single Standard $830 Residential Structure Major $3,375 Complex $6,3(70 Some of the changes being made to the fee schedules will be for the purposes of narrowing some of these gaps, and better clarifying the applicability of the fees in the descriptive text. This has involved creating a few new fee levels, where necessary, and re -balancing the fees to reduce significant gaps where they exist. Funding for PARES The PARES initiative is an important initiative for the planning and permits function to enhance the processing, transparency and reporting of the planning workflow. The current projected cost of PARES is estimated to be approximately 1.7 million dollars. A significant portion of this cost (and potentially the entire cost) is to be recovered through TRCA's fees. At this time, no PARES -specific surcharge is proposed, however, Planning and Permits staff are recommending that any annual surplus that may be attained, as a result of any reductions to expenses or through a higher than anticipated volume of applications, be applied to the PARES project. Comparators In completing our biennial fee review, Planning and Permits staff review the fee reports of our neighboring conservation authorities to ensure that our proposed fee changes are in line with their modifications. Most of our neighboring conservation authorities review their fees on an annual basis, and make incremental changes to cover cost of living increases. Several of the GTHA conservation authorities have undertaken more substantial reviews and updates to fee schedules. For 2021, the following reflects the changes made by our neighboring conservation authorities: • Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) - no increases or cost of living adjustment (COLA) for 2021 per their November 2020 report. Some additional categories are being added, and CVC is proposing to conduct a more detailed review of their fees, utilizing an external consultant, in 2021. • Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority — 2% COLA for both planning and permitting for 2021. • Conservation Halton — hired a consultant to complete a major update to their fees in 2019. A new fee schedule was implemented in 2020. This included a 3% COLA for 2020. For 2021, 2% increase for COLA as well as strategic increases where not fully recovering costs to deliver services. • Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority — 2% Cost of Living for 2021. (Reference: 30 -20 -BOD May 22, 2020). Workload Volume and Level of Service Attachments 6 and 7 to this report provide the comparative summary of submissions for the five-year period of 2016-2020. The following is a brief summary of the volume of files. In 2019 and 2020, Planning and Permits: • Received more than 1200 new permit applications each year associated with private and public projects; • processed more than 700 new planning applications each year in addition to carry-over files. • reviewed infrastructure projects across our jurisdiction, including National Energy Board, Ontario Energy Board, Ontario Environmental Assessment Act in addition to Voluntary Project Review Applications. • processed an average of 1000 solicitor/realtor enquiries. • Processed an average of 200 additional concept development applications. Additionally, TRCA Planning and Permits: • actively participates in LPAT hearings affecting TRCA's interests, as well in support of our municipal partners; • continues to be an active participant in the master planning process for more than 20 new communities per year. In 2019, TRCA Enforcement staff inspected 5,489 permits, a 33% increase over 2018. In 2020, the team conducted 3600 permit compliance inspections, issued 153 violations on 122 properties, received 484 complaints, resolved 50 violations, and conducted 700+ inspections relating to violations and complaints. Planning Applications The volume of new planning applications dipped in 2019 and 2020, likely due to the Covid-19 Pandemic, as well as changes in legislation over this time. As illustrated in Attachment 6, in terms of volume of applications, City of Toronto, Richmond Hill, Vaughan, Markham and the Town of Caledon had the highest numbers of planning applications submitted to the TRCA, respectively. Permit Applications The number of TRCA (Ontario Regulation 166/06) Permit applications that have been received by Planning and Permits from has remained near record high volumes. As identified on Attachment 7 to this report, in 2019 and 2020, permit numbers actually increased over previous years in Brampton, Markham, Pickering, Toronto (East York), Caledon and Whitchurch- Stouffville. Large -Scale Planning Projects and Infrastructure Growth area MESP's (Master Environmental Servicing Plans) tied to new growth, secondary plan and block plan projects continue to be a major focus. A significant workload volume will continue for these growth areas spread through Vaughan, Markham, Richmond Hill, Caledon, Brampton and Seaton. Fluctuations commonly occur with "base' planning and permitting applications from year to year, but a major shift to process growth area studies with municipal partners will continue to be a huge part of a growing workload for 2021-2022. Senior project management and technical capabilities are required from TRCA to support these complex efforts both for greenfield and urban intensification. We are projecting that there will be significant effort required in the planning of the future urban areas of Brampton, Caledon, Vaughan, King, Markham, Richmond Hill, Seaton and the intensification areas within the City of Toronto and City of Mississauga, in 2021-2022, on top of the regular base submissions. Plan review continues to be technically complex as applications move into more sensitive landscapes with water balance considerations involving engineering modeling updates, geotechnical, ecology and hydrogeology expertise. Our engineering and hydrogeology staff complement is under increasing service pressure. In addition, recent changes to the Planning Act and the Conservation Authorities Act have resulted in increased workload pressures related to requested and approved Minister's Zoning Orders (MZOs) within TRCA's jurisdiction as reported to the Board of Directors at their meeting on February 26, 2021. Given the significant amount of staff time and investment involved in the review process of these files, an MZO permit fee has been included in the fee schedule. Infrastructure Planning and Permits Trends In the suburban municipalities, there has been a steady increase in the number of regional and local infrastructure master plans, environmental assessments, and permits. There has been steady growth in municipal and transit related projects. With 25 communities currently in the planning stages, it is anticipated that this growth will only continue to increase in future years. Additionally, many of these municipalities, as well as the City of Toronto, are also undertaking parks and retrofit and upgrade projects, including requirements for both environmental assessments and permits. This relates directly to the fact that old and failing infrastructure was historically built in valleylands. As the rivers and streams downcut and meander over time (a factor of natural process and exacerbated by poorly situated infrastructure and the effects of climate change), the infrastructure is left exposed. Repair to these pipes and bridges is becoming more complex, as well as, more urgent. As the municipalities continue grow and intensify, the stress on the older infrastructure will also continue to increase. Regardless of whether the infrastructure is serving suburban or urban nodes, the complexity of the TRCA review has also changed to account for changes in science and information. Geomorphic assessments, political inputs, redevelopmentlintensification occurring in regulated areas including flood vulnerable sites, ecologically sensitive or hazardous areas are all major factors in infrastructure development today. There is also a growing change in partnership opportunities between infrastructure providers and TRCA Restoration Services, from monitoring, to planting and stream realignments. These synergies between the TRCA and the infrastructure provider to work together in the project construction phase provides essential expert services for challenging construction sites, saves public funds and timing delays to support public infrastructure and private community development. TRCA has dedicated service level agreements (SLAB) with municipal, private sector and agency partners, that have been negotiated based on client needs and TRCA requirements. The SLAB each provide dedicated planning and technical review teams, detailed and expedited service delivery standards, detailed project tracking and reporting, monthly or quarterly partnership review meetings, defined communications procedures, and commitments for TRCA staff to work remotely from the partner office up to one day per week. The fees are negotiated annually through the municipal capital delivery programs, including water and wastewater, roads and transit services. Service agreements began in 2005 and are currently in place with York and Peel Regions, the City of Brampton, Enbridge Gas, Metrolinx. The SLAs are continually refined to meet shifts in service demand, and discussions with new partners are underway based on TRCA discussions related to memorandum of understandings and service level agreements with other partners . The Infrastructure Planning and Permits department has steadily increased their fee and agreement -based revenue from approximately $1.2 million in 2011 to $1.8 million in 2013/14 to almost $2.7 million in 2020. Service agreement and non -service agreement services (funded through fee cost recovery) achieve 100% cost recovery for planning, technical and support services as well as corporate overhead costs. The York Region SLA has been in place since 2005 and includes a significant commitment toward expedited review of applications, ranging between 10 and 20 business days depending on the application type and level of review required. The agreement includes review services for all transportation, water, wastewater and transit services. York Region is the fastest growing municipality in Canada, and the provision of infrastructure is a core deliverable of the municipality. The Peel Region and City of Brampton SLAs have also been in place since 2005. The Enbridge Gas SLA has been in place since 2013 and continues to grow in terms of applications for private users, expansion and maintenance projects, as well as relocations that are required to facilitate other infrastructure projects. The most significant increase in work, both over the past five years and anticipated for the future, is with Metrolinx. TRCA has consolidated the SLA into one agreement for the RER Expansion, Rapid Transit and Subway programs and has recently been asked to also include their Bus program. TRCA continues to work with Metrolinx to implement its compensation strategy, impacts to infrastructure based on climate change impacts, synergies for trail linkages, and synergies related to TRCA erosion control construction projects. Discussion with BILD and Municipal Partners The building industry (represented by BILD) has been very helpful in providing their input into TRCA's Planning and Permitting fee schedules. As part of the fee review process Planning and Permits staff consult with BILD to attain their comments on the proposed changes. A presentation was provided to BILD representatives on March 9, 2021 to outline the proposed changes. A package was then sent to BILD on March 30, 2021 with copies of the proposed fee schedule changes, and an accompanying description of the proposed modifications, for their comments. BILD staff provided confirmation, via email, on April 29, 2021, that they have no comment on the proposed changes to the fee schedules. IPP Staff also consulted with our municipal partners who are not on service level agreements, on the proposed changes to the IPP fee schedule, at recent meetings. Level of Service Permitting Services TRCA staff recently reported to the Board of Directors on our service delivery related to our permitting activities (Item 8.4, April 30, 2021 Board of Directors Meeting). In that report, we identified that our goal is to deliver at least 80% of all permit issuances within the Conservation Ontario (CO) Client Service Guideline timeframes. As outlined in that report, of the 1,101 permits issued in 2020, 1,081 or 98% of the permits met the MNRF Policies and Procedures Guideline and 928 or 84% of the permits met the enhanced CO Guideline, which exceeds the 80% objective. Those that did not meet the Guidelines include complex infrastructure and development permits requiring multiple submissions. In some cases, the reviews may have been impacted by staff turnover and adapting to COVID-19. Planning Services TRCA has service delivery guidelines — not mandated timelines with respect to our processing of planning applications. These guidelines represent the service delivery that we strive to offer. Staff involved in the Planning and Permits function attempt to dynamically shift our resources to the workload. TRCA works to our service delivery guideline of 30-45 days for standard files, 15 days for resubmissions. Very complex technical reviews take longer (60-90 days). In many areas the service delivery target is met or surpassed: Straight -forward applications that meet policy (Committee of Adjustment, minor to standard site plans, minor Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law amendments), compliance is in excess of 90%. Complex applications (MESP, subdivisions, condominium) meet our service delivery guideline approximately 75% of the time. Planning applications are usually led by the municipality — keep within our service standard >85%; and 70% for complex files. Infrastructure Planning and Permits department tracks and reports on a tight service delivery standard for its service delivery partners and meets these standards 85-95% of the time. For non -service delivery partners, regular standards are met approximately 80% of the time. We believe that our service delivery is generally excellent under current workload pressures and the complexity of applications. While TRCA staff currently work to achieve our own service delivery guidelines, we actively work with our municipal partners to achieve their processing timelines. TRCA Planning and Permits staff are committed to working with our municipal partners, through both the creation or updates to Memoranda of Understanding related to the plan review process, as well as through on-going dialogue with municipal staff to ensure that our review timelines and process are adapted to the extent possible to meet the specific timeline needs of our municipal partners. Memoranda of Understanding TRCA Planning and Permits has existing, long-standing 'Plan Review" specific memoranda of understanding with many of our municipal partners, including all of our upper tier municipal partners, and several of our local municipal partners, which clarify the roles and responsibilities and services provided by TRCA Planning and Permits. In accordance with the direction provided in the updates to the Conservation Authorities Act, TRCA staff are presently in the process of reviewing the existing Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs), and establishing new MOUS with all of our other municipal partners. TRCA's current Planning and Permits fee schedules take into account the existing MOUs, and it is staff's position that the proposed fee schedules will also account for new MOUS. However, if revisions are required to the 2021-2022 fee schedules are a result of any changes to, or the creation of new MOUs, TRCA staff will report back to the Bord of Directors at that time on any necessary modifications. Streamlining Efforts Planning and Permits continues to work to improve many areas of our daily operations, increase efficiency, and to enhance customer service. From March 2020 to present, as a result of COVID restrictions, TRCA Planning and Permits staff have worked from home. This has required a rapid transition from our previous paper-based submission, filing and approval process, to a digital process. The results have been significant. Through the hard work of TRCA Planning and Permits staff, we have transitioned to a fully digital process. And, while this has required a number of work-arounds, given our current software and database limitations, it has allowed us to advance of transition to fully digital working on a much faster timeline than originally planned. The PARES initiative is our next step in working towards greater efficiency and transparency in this process, and to permanently establishing a high quality fully digital process. Other efficiencies have been found in moving to on-line meetings, which has significantly reduced the amount of time spent travelling between meetings for our staff. Planning and Permits staff will continue to work on these streamlining initiatives, as well as others, such as streamlining our current review processes, as we transition back into working in the office in the future. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Following approval of this report and the associated updated fee schedules, Planning and Permits staff will update and conduct a final quality review of the Administrative Fee Schedules for Planning, Permitting and Infrastructure Planning and Permitting, in addition to the requisite changes to our databases and our website, for implementation on June 1, 2021. Staff will also provide the updated fee schedules to BILD and our municipal partners. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategies set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 4 — Create complete communities that integrate nature and the built environment Strategy 2 — Manage our regional water resources for current and future generations Strategy 7 — Build partnerships and new business models Report prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Emails:guentin.hanchard(&trca.ca For Information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324, or Sameer Dhalla, extension 5350 Emails: ouentin.hanchard(a)trca.ca; sameer.dhallaCD_trca.ca Date: April 30, 2021 Attachments: 7 Attachment 1: Planning and Permit Applications Received 2013 — 2020 Attachment 2: Permit Application by Type 2013 to 2020 Attachment 3: Proposed Permit Fee Schedule 2021 - 2022 Attachment 4: Proposed Planning Fee Schedule 2021 - 2022 Attachment 5: Proposed EA Planning and Infrastructure Permitting Fee Schedule 2021 - 2022 Attachment 6: Number of Planning Applications Received by Municipality Attachment 7: Number of Permits by Municipality Appendix 1: Planning and Permit Applications Received 2013-2020 1600 1400 1200 1000 Number of Permits and Development Planning Files Received by Year 1462 1018 ...........%= ....... 784 800 678 ....... 600 400 200 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ■ Number of Planning Applications ■ Number of Permits •1294 " ......... 22i2.......... 1229 893 ...... ■ 2018 2019 I 2020 Appendix 2: Permit Applications by Type — 2013 to 2020 *note that the colors at the top of the columns denote the fee schedules in place at the time (i.e. yellow — 2012-2013, green 2014-2015, etc.). 2016 is the index year that has been used as a 'standard' year for planning purposes with respect to the average number of planning and permit applications that are anticipated. 2013 2014 2015 2018 2019 2070 Total Number of Permits received 1064 1046 1191 1301 1462 1194 1212 1233 Letter of Approval (Minor) Minor Works (DPP) 294 254 288 208 246 203 214 220 Routine Infrastructure Works {11313} 155 160 196 317 339 277 319 274 Standard (Full Permits) 615 632 707 776 877 714 679 739 IPP Files 128 177 128 125 178 119 146 150 DPP Permit 487 455 579 651 699 595 533 589 Private Res Minor 207 167 217 258 263 222 228 282 Private Res Standard 118 146 176 197 246 179 143 147 Private Res Major 5 2 2 5 1 8 5 3 Private Res Complex 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 Projects on Subdivision/Com mercial Minor 76 72 68 48 85 72 84 82 Standard 58 55 92 94 82 94 64 61 Major/Complex 5 8 8 9 17 18 6 12 Other 15 5 16 3 3 2 2 1 *note that the colors at the top of the columns denote the fee schedules in place at the time (i.e. yellow — 2012-2013, green 2014-2015, etc.). 2016 is the index year that has been used as a 'standard' year for planning purposes with respect to the average number of planning and permit applications that are anticipated. TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule For PERMITTING SERVICES For Development, Interference with Wetlands & Alterations Toronto and Region To Shorelines & Watercourses (Ontario Regulation 166/06) ..w Conservation IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Authority Draft proposed fees 2021-2022 — under review Introduction TRCA's Fee Schedule for Permitting Services for Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses (Ontario Regulation 166/06) was adopted by Resolution #A151/17 (as amended) of the Authority on January 26, 2018. The Fee Schedule adheres to the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry "Policies and Procedures for Charging of Conservation Authority Fees", and the TRCA's Fees Policy/Guideline 2010. The Fee Schedule includes a broad spectrum of fee categories within each application type to accurately cover the scale of work. The lower fees apply to minor and less complex applications with modest scale efforts. Higher fees apply to more complex applications requiring a higher level of regulatory and technical review. The Fee Schedule also includes fees for services that assist with streamlining processing and approval efforts for the applicant, such as phased approvals, expedited review charges, red -line revision processing (where possible), and a project management assistance fee. Administration of Applications and Fees (General Notes): 1. All applications must be deemed complete by TRCA, inclusive of fee submission, prior to commencement of submission processing. 2. All permit application submissions and associated fees must be administered through the Development and Engineering Services Division of TRCA. 3. Pre -consultation - A pre -consultation meeting with TRCA staff to determine the scope of issues for the permit application is mandatory. TRCA processing fees will be determined based on a predetermined scope of work. If through the application processing, the scope of the application changes, fee adjustments will be determined. 4. General inquiries and negotiation of fees will be directed through TRCA's Planning Senior Managers or Associate Directors on issues of interpretation and scoping of work requirements. 5. Fee appeal process - Any dispute of fee calculations that cannot be resolved through consultation with TRCA's Director or Associate Director , Development and Engineering Services and/or CEO's office, can be appealed through the Budget/Audit Advisory Board and/or the Authority. Delegation format is recommended for an appeal. 6. Any refunds, where applicable, will be approved by the Director or Associate Director , Development and Engineering Services. 7. The permit fee will be paid at the time of filing an application to TRCA. In the event that the permit fee is not paid at the time of filing an application, the current fee as of the time of issuance of the permit must be paid prior to issuing a permit. 8. TRCA reserves the right to request additional fees should the review require a substantially greater level of effort. Additional fees may also need to be charged to the applicant for peer reviews that may be required for shoreline works, geotechnical, and specialized modelling. 9. All permits are issued for two years. Requests for initial permit issuance (only) beyond the standard two-year time period, (up to 5 years), will be subject to an additional fee of 50% of the current fee for each additional year to cover compliance monitoring and will require Executive Committee approval. 10. On a one-time basis, applicants may apply for a permit extension provided such requests are made 60 days prior to the expiration of an Ontario Regulation 166/06 permit. In the Application for Permit Re -issuance, applicants shall set out the reasons for which an extension is required. Requests for a permit extension/re-issuance beyond the standard two-year time period, (up to 5 years), will be subject to an additional fee of 50% of the current fee for each additional year to cover compliance monitoring and will require Executive Committee approval. 11. TRCA reserves the right to adjust fees related to regulatory legislation changes or updates. 12. Expedited Review Additional Charge applies only to unanticipated circumstances requiring fast -tracked approvals (primarily clearance), and can only be approved by the Director or Associate Director as staffing capability allows. 13. TRCA staff will process permit applications in accordance with Board approved policies and procedures, as per Authority Resolutions A/198/13, A199/13 and A103/15, (i.e. Major, Standard Delegated, Minor Works, Routine Infrastructure Works). Permit fees are determined by TRCA asset out in this schedule based upon the scale and scope of the component of the project, independent of the administrative review process. Definitions a) Minor Ancillary (outside of hazard) - applies to non -habitable projects that are partially or wholly within TRCA's Regulated area, but are entirely outside of all hazards (erosion, slope stability, floodplain). Review of technical studies, site visits and meetings are not included. If technical reports, a site visit or meeting is required, the application will be considered to be Minor, Standard or Major. Completion of a Concept Development application prior to submitting for a Minor Ancillary Permit is recommended. b) Minor Ancillary Residential - applies to non -habitable minor ancillary structures and landscaping and only for applications that are outside of all hazards, valley and stream corridors and are setback a minimum of six metres from all hazards, and for which a technical review is not required. Includes small-scale projects within wetland area of interference areas, beyond 30m. Does not include a site visit and does not include a meeting. c) Minor - applies to ancillary structures such as decks, sheds, garages, and pools and placement of less than 30 cubic metres of fill located adjacent to a natural feature or natural hazard, which may affect the program or policy interests of TRCA. Includes a site visit or a meeting with a TRCA planner without TRCA technical staff.. A maximum of one submission is included, after which additional fees will apply. d) Standard — applies to additions, minor additios or nc I ry works in the floodplain, structures or buildings that are not within or directly adjacent to flooding or erosion hazards, and placement of fill (over 305 #(es) and associated grading/fill placement which meet TRCA policies and require scoped technical review related to one technical discipline (e.g. review of letter report).. Includes one meeting or site visit with up to two staff members. A maximum of two submissions are included, after which additional fees will apply. Completion of a Concept Development application prior to submitting for a Standard Permit may be recommended. e) Major — applies to additions, new structures or buildings, works in the floodplain or erosion hazard and placement of fill (over 30 cubic metres) and associated grading/FII placement which meet TRCA policies. Includes technical analysis in up to two technical disciplines (e.g. standard Environmental Impact Study review and/or water management screening and assessment, or standard geotechnical review).. Includes up to one site visit and two meetings. A maximum of two submissions are included, after which, additional fees will apply. Completion of a Concept Development application prior to submitting for a Major Permit is recommended. f) Complex — applies to major additions (greater than 50% of the original ground floor area), new structures or buildings, works in the floodplain or erosion hazard, and the placement of 30 cubic metres of fill or more projects which are significant in geographic area, and/or for which submission of several applicable technical studies is required to demonstrate that TRCA or partner municipality program and policy interests can be met. Complex projects generally require more detailed ecological, geotechnical, water resource engineering, hydro -geological, or fluvial geomorphology studies and assessment. Complex projects may require up to three technical team or planning meetings, and up to two site visits.. A maximum of three submissions are included, after which additional fees will apply. Note: Additional charges will apply for additional meetings or site visits. TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule For PERMITTING SERVICES For Development, Interference with Wetlands & Alterations oron o an eglon To Shorelines & Watercourses (Ontario Regulation 166/06) Conservation IMPLEMENTATION GUI EUNES Authority n., IOntario Regulation 166/06 Application Application Type Application Fee Fee 2021 Notes Works on Private Residential Property MiROF AmillaFy ResideRW SM Individual Residential Inflationary increase only. Relocation fee Minor $470 $495 of minor ancillary, reduction of major percentage of current fee Standard $875 $920 and complex fees. Major *$2,000 $1,315 Complex *$3,000 $2,500 Utilities: See TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for 25% No Change Single residential Environmental Assessment and Major Revisions increase to smaller fees as they are Development project -based Infrastructure Permitting Services. 50% not covering costs. Projects on Subdivision Lands, Up to 1 Day $1,550 Revision with Re -Issuance Commercial, Industrial and Up to 1 Day $2,870 75% Inflationary increase only. Add MZO Institutional Properties, Recreation 50%gpr Vgee 50% of current fee permits to this list, due to the extensive and Other Projects (per $1,000 in addition to all other permit fees. $1,000 in addition to all other process and staff time involved. component). $30 + HST per pdf or hard copy digital permit fees. Ancillary Structures: $1,000 in addition to all other permit fees. $1,000 in addition to all other No Change Technical Review $869 permit fees. • Minor Ancillary - Other (per $2,100 $2,250 component, Ancillary $100 + HST for HEC -RAS modelling $150 + HST for Hydraulic Minor Increase to hourly rate to reflect structures, Resurfacing, files associated with each floodline and/or Hydrologic modelling cost of delivering service. Individual Site Landscaping) map sheet files/reports Minor Projects: Per Project $6,500 $6,825 Small-scale topsoil stripping/ hydraulic and modelling files) map sheet individual property temporary $6,065 stormwater management 100% premium, in addition to applicable No Change Minor ouffalls permit fee Minor Improvements (trails, minor recreational facilities, etc.) Standard Projects: Per Project $9,950 $10,500 Standard topsoil stripping/temporary stormwater management • SWM Ponds and associated outfalls • Standard Road Crossings • Major Grading/Earth Works • Minor In -stream Remediation Works Alterations/Restoration of Wetlands Major Projects: • Major Ouffalls Per Project $19,550 $20,550 Major Road Crossings $19,550 $49,550 $20,550 Major filling (Subdivision, $21,750 $22,850 Commercial, Employment, Institutional, others) Complex Projects: • Relocation of Stream $21,750 $22,850 Corridor/New Channel Design • Complex F4 -Project (including $25,000 - $75,000 $25,000-$75,000 MZO)* base fee Application Type Application Fee Notes Permit Revisions - percentage of current Individual Residential 50% Individual Residential No Change fee (Ancillary 50% percentage of current fee Others Major/Complex 100% Minor Revisions 25% Others Major Revisions 50% Minor Revisions Additional Site Visit Charges: 25% Inflationary increase and slight • Planner Only (Minor Only) Revision with Re -Issuance 75% Major Revisions increase to smaller fees as they are • *Scoped staff - Up to 2 Up to '/3 Day $775 50% not covering costs. • *Scoped staff - Up to 2 Up to 1 Day $1,550 Revision with Re -Issuance • Team Up to 1 Day $2,870 75% Permit Re -Issuance (Extension) 50%gpr Vgee 50% of current fee No Change Major or Complex Permit Application $1,000 in addition to all other permit fees. $1,000 in addition to all other No Change with Letter of Undertaking $30 + HST per pdf or hard copy digital permit fees. Major or Complex Projects - Additional $1,000 in addition to all other permit fees. $1,000 in addition to all other No Change Technical Review $125 + HST per digital floodline map permit fees. Other Applicable Fees Application Type Application Fee Notes All applications located in a Special Policy Minor 25% Minor (Ancillary Structures) 25% No Change Area (SPA) will be charged an additional (Ancillary Standard 50% percentage of current fee Structures) Major/Complex 100% Standard 50% Major/Complex 100% Additional Site Visit Charges: Inflationary increase and slight • Planner Only (Minor Only) Up to 3 Hours $350 $450 increase to smaller fees as they are • *Scoped staff - Up to 2 Up to '/3 Day $775 $850 not covering costs. • *Scoped staff - Up to 2 Up to 1 Day $1,550 $1900 • Team Up to 1 Day $2,870 $3015 GIS Fee $50/hour + HST data preparation $75/hour + HST data preparation Minor Increase to hourly rate to reflect cost of delivering service. $30 + HST per pdf or hard copy digital $30 + HST per pdf or hard copy floodline map sheet (CAD) digital floodline map sheet (CAD) $125 + HST per digital floodline map $125 + HST per digital floodline sheet CAD map sheet CAD Engineering Data Request $100 + HST for HEC -RAS modelling $150 + HST for Hydraulic Minor Increase to hourly rate to reflect files associated with each floodline and/or Hydrologic modelling cost of delivering service. map sheet files/reports $225 + HST per map sheet (Combined $125 + HST per digital floodline hydraulic and modelling files) map sheet $6,065 Emergency Works 100% premium, in addition to applicable No Change permit fee TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule For PERMITTING SERVICES For Development, Interference with Wetlands & Alterations To Shorelines & Watercourses (Ontario Regulation 166/06) IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Draft proposed fees 2021-2022 — under review Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Red Line Revisions by TRCA Minor $775 No Change Optional Expedited Review additional Major $1,655 No change Waterfront Development additional charge $1,655 - $2,760 No Change for shoreline engineering peer review. Page 3 of 6 Application Type Application Fee Notes Optional Expedited Review additional Additional 100% of current fee No change charge (Director or Associate Director approved) - Percentage of current fee. Page 3 of 6 Optional Expedited Permit Issuance/ Additional 50% of current fee No change Re -issuance $2,425 (Director or Associate Director $225 Approved) To be determined Additional Meetings 25% of current fee (Per additional meeting) No change Repeat Submissions - Percentage of 50% of current fee No change current fee for each additional Minor Ancillary - 100% of current fee submission Application Type Application Fee Notes Project Management Assistance To be negotiated No change (voluntary as required) Page 3 of 6 Compliance Monitoring: No change • Permit Non-compliance $2,425 • Compliance Reports -Clearance Letter $225 • Negotiated Restoration Agreement To be determined Voluntary compliance related to 200% of related fee No change resolution of violation (only where supported by TRCA staff) Archaeological screening (on T -RCA owned 'ends only) $560 + HST $565 + HST Minor change Additional Geotechnical and Hydrogeology Standard $2,100 No Change Review Major $3,150 - $4,725 Screening Letter/Clearance $105 $125 Inflationary increase only (Residential/Minor Projects) Minor Ancillary $210 $225 Inflationary increase only. Private Residential - Minor Ancillary Residential Works on Commercial/Subdivision/Industrial • Minor Ancillary - Single Structure Only $865 $910 Municipal Development Projects (NOT EA $5,775 $6,065 Inflationary increase only. related) Municipal Environmental Assessment See TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for No change (EA) Projects Environmental Assessment and Infrastructure Permitting Services. TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for PLANNING SERVICES IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Draft -2021-2022 Proposed Fees Introduction Toronto and Region Conservation Authority TRCA's Fee Schedule for Planning Services was approved by Resolution #A151/17 (as amended) of the Authority on January 26, 2018. The Fee Schedule adheres to the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry "Policies and Procedures for Charging of Conservation Authority Fees', TRCA's Fees Policy/Guideline 2010, and the range of planning services consistent with TRCA's Memorandums of Understanding with area municipalities. The Fee Schedule includes a broad spectrum of fee categories within each application type to accurately cover the scale of work. The lower fees apply to minor and less complex applications, and modest scale efforts. Higher fees apply to more complex applications requiring a higher level of planning and technical review. This Fee Schedule provides a layered approach, in which base fees are presented in the categories in the front portion of the fee schedule, with additional fees for specialized work in the back. portion. These additional fees, (e.g. additional technical review, site visits and meetings) beyond the base fees, may apply. Where possible, TRCA staff will identify as early as possible when additional fees are necessary. We recommend that applicants with more complex applications familiarize themselves with the additional fees that may apply. The Fee Schedule also includes fees for services that assist with streamlining processing and approval for the applicant, such as phased approvals, expedited review, red -line revisions (where possible), and project management assistance. Administration of Applications and Fees (General Notes) 1. All applications must be deemed complete by TRCA, inclusive of fee submission, prior to commencement of the review process. 2. All planning application submissions and associated fees are administered through the Development and Engineering Services Division of TRCA. 3. A pre -consultation meeting with the municipality and TRCA staff to determine the scope of issues for the planning application should be held. TRCA processing fees will be determined based on a predetermined scope of work. If, the scope of the application changes throughout the review process, then fee adjustments will be determined. 4. General inquiries and applicability of fees will be directed through TRCA's planning Senior Managers or Associate Directors on issues of interpretation and scoping of work requirements. 5. Fee appeal process - Any dispute of fee calculations that cannot be resolved through consultation with TRCA's Associate Director, Development Planning and Permits or the Director, Development and Engineering Services can be directed to the CEO's office. 6. Any refunds, where applicable, will be approved by the Associate Director, Development Planning and Permits or the Director, Development and Engineering Services. 7. The application fee will be paid at the time of filing an application to the municipality. The clearance fee will be paid directly to TRCA prior to a request for final clearance of an application. All payments must be made within 30 days of TRCA notification in writing. If application fees have not been paid at the time of submission of the application, fees will be assessed in accordance with the fee schedule in place at the time in which payment occurs. Interest will be charged and accumulated beyond 30 days. 8. Re -submission fees must be paid prior to final clearance of an application. Only one set of fees applies when processing and reviewing a combined application (e.g. a combined Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Subdivision application), however, planning and permit fees are separate. For combined planning applications, the highest rate of fees applies. Separate fees apply if the applications are received more than 3 months apart. For Minor Concept Development applications (only) that are immediately followed by associated permit applications, a credit of up to $100 of the Minor Concept Development fee may be applied to the permit application, at the discretion of the TRCA Planner. 9. TRCA reserves the right to request additional fees or adjust fees should the review require a substantially greater level of effort or for development application scenarios not captured in the Fee Schedule. Custom fees will be negotiated for optional expedited review or unique circumstances for large scale or complex review efforts. Peer reviews may also be required for shoreline works, geotechnical and specialized modeling which, if required, will be charged to the applicant. TRCA reserves the right to re -assess fee requirements after one year of processing planning applications. Additional fees can be charged after one year and for applications still in process for which applicant -driven delays have been experienced. 10. TRCA reserves the right to adjust fees to reflect new planning or regulatory legislative requirements. 11. Base geotechnical and hydrogeology review is included. Applications will be subject to an additional fee for complex reviews and advisory services. TRCA will inform applicants as early as possible in the process. 12. Any application that is inactive for 2 years or more is considered dormant by TRCA and a new application (or top -up) for processing and fee purposes is required. 13. Draft Plan of Subdivision 1. Refer to Definitions for application category criteria. 2. For subdivisions with no MESP produced within the last 10 years, the subdivisions will be considered to be Major or Complex. 3. Complex subdivisions without a current MESP will be subjecttoan additional per unitfee of $105. Industrial subdivisions without prior comprehensive MESP review will be charged an additional $475 per hectare. See General Note#9 and #11. 4. As the file review progresses, should the issues and review become more complexthanoriginallyanticipated, then the fee will correspondingly increase as per scope of work. 5. For sites greater than 50 he, additional fees will be applied. there will be a site specific discussion on scope of review depending on size and complexity of the specific application. Administration of Master Environmental Servicing Plan (MESP) Applications (No change for 2021-22) The Fee Schedule sets a Base Fee across the jurisdiction as follows: Proposals 25ha or less: $ 7,875 Base Fee Proposals greater than 25ha: $15,750 Base Fee 1. A baseline charge of $475 per gross hectare is applied to each application. The gross area includes natural systems. For small urban or infill MESPs, a per lot fee of $105 may be applied in lieu of the gross per hectare charge, at the discretion of TRCA staff. 2. An additional project management fee will be added to cover meetings for committee and team coordination, as well as, general meeting sessions (Range $25,000 - $50,000). (No change for 2021-22) The following apply to MESP applications: 1. The Fee Schedule assumes an average 2 -year timeframe for MESP completion. TRCA reserves the right to re-evaluate the MESP scope of work and progress related to fee status after a 2 -year process. Additional fees will be added for extended timeframes and associated multiple reviews. Payment is due for changes in scope and timeline at the 2 -year review date. Standard and Non-standard MESPlsubwatershed Studies: Standard fee agreements - all new fee calculations will follow the base guidelines set herein with associated meeting coordination allowances at the study outset. Timeline schedules and Terms of Reference set with the municipalities and landowners will assist in work flow and anticipated work program completion. All studies will be re-evaluated at the 2 -year milestone (or as agreed in a Terms of Reference or upfront agreement) for changes in scope, extent of coordination, and anticipated cost to complete remaining stages of work. Extended project delays may need re-evaluation on an annual basis to fairly determine project progress and adjust work program scoping with the municipality and landowner group participation. All evaluations will be provided in writing. Fees are required to build capacity for complex reviews and to meet service delivery needs for all. Non -Standard fee agreements - On occasion, study review requirements need to be adjusted to unique circumstances to assist the municipality and/or landowners to meet new conditions or timing considerations. These adjustments need to be incorporated into a non-standard MESP/subwatershed fee agreement to address variables in scheduling, numbers of reviews or staggered submissions, phasing, additional unanticipated technical reviews, updates and transitional files, reasonable expedited requirements. Changes to the base standard costing agreements will be negotiated on a time allowance basis upfront in a new process (when known) or at key annual evaluation milestones in active processes as noted above. 2. A Terms of Reference for the MESP (see TRCA's MESP Guidelines) must be prepared and agreed to by all parties including the municipality, TRCA and the proponent. 3. All MESP fees are required at the initiation of the study or as negotiated through Terms of Reference and agreement. The following alternative milestone payment structure still provides the minimum base payment schedule of older MESP agreements and can be adjusted through agreement. MESP PHASE OF WORK PAYABLE a. Preliminary Initiation (at Project start-up) (Scoping of MESP/Terms of Reference Initiation) Base Fee applies b. Terms of Reference completion/MESP Initiation 50% payable (Includes existing conditions report/field work/first MESP submission/review) c. Prior to First Submission Comments 20% payable d. Prior to issuance of final MESP approval by TRCA (Maximum 3 review submissions) 30% payable 4. All official plan amendment, zoning and draft plans of subdivision fee requirements that evolve out of the Secondary/ Block Plan process and MESP process apply separately as per TRCA's approved Fee Schedule at the time of submission. No additional per lot charges will apply on draft plans of subdivision if an MESP is completed, approved and paid for. 5. Plans of subdivision that have not been studied under the MESP process will be charged an additional fee of $105 per unit, over and above the subdivision Page 1 of 9 TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for PLANNING SERVICES IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Draft -2021-2022 Proposed Fees base and clearance fees (see schedule). Subdivisions not included as part of original MESP/Block Plan approval will be charged on a per unit basis for updated plans. 6. Construction permits for works under TRCA's provincial regulation are charged separately at the time of detailed design and construction of draft plan components (such as stormwater management facilities, road/bridge crossings, pipe boring and drilling works, stream channel works, etc.). Definitions The following definitions apply to applications to determine fee review category: a) Screening Letter - projects that do not affect the program or policy interests of TRCA and for which a clearance letter is being requested. Clearance may be provided in an e-mail. Site visits, meetings and technical or policy review are not included; one submission of screening information is included. If the submission materials are updated or amended, a new fee will be applied. b) Screening Assessment - projects for which a letter is required from TRCA (i.e. is located adjacent to a natural feature or natural hazard area) but the proposal does not affect the program or policy interests of TRCA and technical review comments are not required. One submission is included. If the submission materials are updated or amended, a new fee will be applied. Site visits and meetings are not included. If a site visit or meeting is required, the application will be considered to be Minor, Standard or Major. c) Minor - projects for which a letter/response is required from TRCA (for properties located adjacent and not within a natural feature or natural hazard area) which may affect the program or policy interests of TRCA, and for which comments from TRCA may be provided. Minor projects may require technical review related to only one technical discipline. Up W ORe Site Visit OF FReetiRg With a TR^A o'^^^^- is ROlUded Up to two submissions (initial and final) are included. Minor Subdivisions (less than 5ha) are those with ten or fewer lots, for which a technical review is not required by TRCA, however, TRCA's participation is necessary (two submissions or a site visit mult pie submissions not applicable to Minor Concept Development). Minor Site Plan are for small- scale projects located outside of all hazards for which a technical review is not required by TRCA, however, TRCA's participation is necessary. All Minor single family categories do not include a site visit, and include only scoped review. d)Standard - projects that meet TRCA policies, and require scoped technical analysis in up to two technical disciplines (i.e. scoped EIS review and/or water management screening and assessment, or standard geotechnical review). Up to one meeting and one site visit with a TRCA Planner and one TRCA technical staff member is included. Up to three submissions are included (multiple submissions not applicable to Standard Concept Development). e) Major - projects which are significant in geographic area, and/or for which submission of multi -disciplinary technical studies are required to demonstrate that TRCA or partner municipality program or complex policy interests can be met. Major projects generally require more complex ecological, geotechnical, water resource engineering, hydrogeological, or fluvial geomorphic studies and assessment. Major projects may require a site visit and up to two technical team or planning meetings. Up to three submissions are included. 0 Complex - projects for which a full suite of applicable technical studies is required to demonstrate consistency with TRCA or partner municipality program or complex policy interests. Complex projects typically involve extensive modifications to the landscape. Complex projects may also be characterized by one or more of the following: I. The need for up to three working meetings and up to three submissions; it. The need for additional TRCA technical assessments (i.e. technical modeling refinements); iii. Extensive technical study review in one or more of the following: including complex hydrogeological, fluvial geomorphology, natural channel design, wetland interference, environmental impact studies; or, iv. Require more than one day of TRCA fieldwork. g)Additional Site Visit Charges - Unless otherwise stated, site visits are not included in the fees assessed for all screening letters and screening assessments, "Minor" applications in all categories, and Solicitor -Realtor enquiries. Should site visits be required, or be requested for applications in these categories, additional site visit fees will apply, in accordance with the site visit fees prescribed in this Fee Schedule. h) Incomplete/unconsolidated Submissions - A submission for review is deemed to be "incomplete" where TRCA has identified requirements, and the application has not met all requirements. The following scenarios are examples of situations in which an application may be deemed incomplete or unconsolidated: 1. Where all technical or supporting studies that are required to meet TRCA's submission requirements have not been provided with the application; 2. Where component studies are submitted in a piecemeal fashion; 3. Where the findings and analysis in component reports are not integrated in a multi -discipline submission (e.g. where an Environmental Impact Study, Functional Servicing Report, and Hydrogeological report are packaged together and each report has not considered the findings of the others). I) Applicant Driven Formal Modification - A fee for an "applicant driven formal modification" will be charged where plans are submitted for review after the application has been formally circulated by, or received planning approval from the municipality, and TRCA review is still in progress/on-going. j) File Continuation - Applicable to files that continue beyond two years from the date of submission of the application. At two years, and two year intervals thereafter, if the applications are still in the review or approval process, application fees will need to be topped -up to current fees in the applicable fee schedule at that time. This is to be completed through a re-evaluation of the status of the application and scope of the review remaining, to review the need for any additional fee requirements. k) Major and Complex Files without Prior MESP (non -subdivision) - Where Major or Complex files, (Rezoning Applications, Official Plan Amendments, Site Plans - not including subdivisions which are addressed separately) are submitted without an MESP, and an MESP has not been completed for the area within the past 10 years, may be subject to additional review fees. At the time of application, where possible, TRCA staff will identify whether additional fees are applicable. Note: Additional charges will apply for additional meetings or site visits. Additional meetings will be assessed the same fee as additional site visits, inclusive of travel and preparation time, in accordance with the site visit fees identified herein. Page 2 of 9 Toronto and Region TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for Conservation PLANNING SERVICES Authority IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Draft - 2021-2022 Proposed Fees Fee Schedule for Planning Services Application Type Application Fee Proposed 2021-22 Cleara Proposed Description of proposed nce Clearance change Fee Fee ,ee. 8GF8e,,;,,,, w $195 $0 N/A Consolidated with screening letter other - listed at end of fee (Res"'"'� schedule.. SOFeeRiRg letteF ^•he• MineF $385 Staadard--$289 NIA N/A Remove category. Property dies MajeF $265 "Maj inquiry will be used in place of Complex $3;050 Cemp4ex $1,-1 o this. Vulnerable Areas Screening $95 $95 $0 $0 No Change Fees Source Water Protection Solicitor/Realtor Screening $325 $340 N/A N/A 5% inflationary increase only Service Update Screening Letters *$125 $150 Concept Development/ Minor $370 $390 5% inflationary increase - Minor. Property Inquiry - Single Standard $830 $975 Standard increased as a result of Residential Structure Major $3,375 $2,275 site visit and meeting costs. Complex $6,370 $5,500 Major and complex decreased. Additional $1,100 No Change Technical Review $3,300 Exped ted Real Estate Review No Change Concept Development/ Minor $830 Minor $ 875 5% inflationary increase. Property Inquiry - Residential Standard $3,375 Standard $1,275 Standard and Major lowered. Multi -dwelling, Commercial, Major $6,370 Major $3,375 Industrial, Institutional Complex Application Complex Application Specific Speck Fee fee Minor Variance - Residential Minor *$580 Minor $ 610 5% inflationary increase. Standard $830 Standard $ 875 ADD note -Minor does not include Major $1,400 Major $1,470 a site visit. Standard includes site visit and scoped review, one disc one review. Site visit and multi- discipline/submissions = major. Variance - Industrial/ Minor `$1,100 Minor $1,155 5% inflationary increase Commercial/Subdivision/ Major $1,860 Major $1,950 Institutional Consent/Severance/Land Minor $1,400 Minor $1,470 5% inflationary increase for Division (Per Lot) Major $3,375 Standard (NEW) $2,310 Minor and Major. New Major $3,559 Standard category Single Residential Site Plan Minor $830 $875 $0 $0 5% inflationary increase only. Standard $1,315 $1,400 $265 $280 Major *$2,300 $2.415 $735 $775 Complex *$3,300 $3,465 $1,775 $1,875 Site Plan Minor $2,950 $3,100 $1,100 $1,155 5% inflationary increases. Standard $8,950 $9,950 $1,775 $1,875 Standard increased slightly to Major $14,950 $15,700 $4,375 $4,600 better reflect scope of work. Complex $24,500 $25,750 $4,375 $4,600 Page 3 of 9 Toronto and Region TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for ` Conservation PLANNING SERVICES Authority IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES ra -A0pKdadrJA2ryp@posed Fees Current Application Fee Proposed Current Proposed Description of proposed No Change No change to fees for 2021-22 other than addition of per lot option Application Clearance Fee Clearance change Servicing Plan Fee category. Fee Base Fee Greater than *$15,750 No Change Industrial/Commercial) 25ha Multi -Unit Building (Site Minor $17,550 $18,500 $6,050 $6,350 5% inflationary increase only. Plan, Rental, Condominium, Standard $24,950 $26,200 $16,600 $17,450 Fee Mixed Use) Major $37,500 $39,375 $16,600 $17,450 Management Fee) Complex $52,500 $55,125 $16,600 $17,450 hectare for Official Plan Amendment ..,ent $836 comprehensive 5% inflationary increase (OPA) Minor $2,950 $3,100 $0 $0 only. No change to Standard $8,950 $9,400 $0 $0 clearance fees. Master Plan & Major $12,600 $13,250 $0 $0 Agreement Complex $21,000 $22,050 $0 $0 No change Zoning By-law AmendmenU Sereen'ng Assessment $836 $0 $0 5% inflationary increase Rezoning (ZBA/RZ) Minor $2,950 $3,100 $0 $0 only. No change to or clearance for MESP Standard $8,950 $9,400 $0 $0 clearance fees. Major $12,600 $13,250 $0 $0 compensation, LPAT Complex $21,000 $22.050 $0 $0 applicable fee Screening Assessment $875 $920 $0 $0 Moved from categories (OPA/ZBA) Ipplicable feE Optional Expedited above. 5% inflationary GleaFaR68 (I Week) ffemium of appi162ble fee-. increase only. Condominium Agreement $5,800 $5,800 $0 $0 No Change Clearance - Admin/Registration Draft Plan of Subdivision (Residential/Industrial/ Less than 5ha *Minor $6,300 $6,615 $2,775 $2,950 5% inflationary increase only. No change to per Commercial Subdivision) Standard $21,000 $22,050 $6,025 $6,350 Iotlper hectare fee. Major $36,750 $35,450 $16,600 $17,430 Complex $50,400 $52,950 $16,600 $17,430 She to 10ha Standard $30,100 $31,600 $16,600 $17,430 Major $50,675 $53,250 $16,600 $17,430 Complex $59,325 $62,250 $16,600 $17,430 10ha to 25 ha Standard $40,550 $42,600 $16,600 $17,430 Major $52,300 $54,950 $16,600 $17,430 Complex $59,325 $62,300 $16,600 $17,430 25ha and Greater Standard $51,750 $54,350 $16,600 $17,430 Major $57,750 $57,500 $16,600 $17,430 Complex $62,900 $66,050 $16,600 $17,430 Per Unit (If applicable) $105/Unit $105/Unit Per he (If applicable) $475/ha $475/ha Clearance Fee for Additional Standard - within one $2,900 $3,045 5% inflationary increase only. Subdivision Phases year Standard - with new $5,515 $5,800 technical information or beyond one year Golf Courses, Aggregate Standard $23,200 $23,300 No Change Pits or Large-scale Fill (Base Fee) (Base Fee) Operations Complex $44,100 $44,100 (Base Fee) (Base Fee) Application Type Application Fee Notes Block and Tertiary Plans Base Fee 25ha or *$7,875 No Change No change to fees for 2021-22 other than addition of per lot option and Master Environmental Less for urban/infill MESPs using rate previously in subdivision Servicing Plan category. (MESP) (Residential & Base Fee Greater than *$15,750 No Change Industrial/Commercial) 25ha (All fees will apply for this application type e.g. Project Management *$25,000 - $50,000 Application Fee, Per Fee Hectare Fee and Project *Additional charge Management Fee) of $475 per hectare for comprehensive MESP. $105 per lot (small, infill, urban MESP). Master Plan & Negotiated in a Terms of Reference No Change subwatershed study Agreement Optional Expedited Review $5,000 - $20,000 No change per review Categories consolidated for major file expedited review. Optional Expedited Review Meget4atedbased or clearance for MESP upen-ssepe of we* subwatecsged er Major files, and availability. MZO requests, Additional 100% compensation, LPAT premium of settlements applicable fee Optima al Expel ted Addltlonal 76% Clearance (2Weeks) Ipplicable feE Optional Expedited Additional -150% GleaFaR68 (I Week) ffemium of appi162ble fee-. Page 4 of 9 Toronto and Region TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for Conservation PLANNING SERVICES Authority IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Draft — 2021-2022 Proposed Fees Description Fee Notes Pre -consultation - meeting (Planner No Charge No Charge No change only) conformity, Master Plan - not P- Fe GG isulta"ep Technical team Up to'/, day $2,870 $2900 Inflationary increase only, Fees site visit* adjusted to reflect calculated cost of $560 + HST Up to 1 day $4,200 delivering service — consistent with No Change technical review related to IPP fee schedule *Note:- inclusive of travel time TRCA Project Management Fee where applicable. Up to 3 staff No Change (to assist with coordinating TRCA's members. Additional staff reviews and project timelines members $600 for up to 1/2 day, $900 for up to full day. *Note - that one site visit with scoped staff is included in Major and Complex applications . Pre annsultatien Additional Inflationary increase - Fees adjusted Technical Team Meeting* to reflect calculated cost of delivering Virtual or at TRCA Office service — consistent with IPP fee Up to % day(Includingtravel tinne) $1,550 $1,965 schedule Out of TRCA office $2,870 $2,975 Up to 1 day (IRGlud"^ :,e) *Note:inclusive of travel time where applicable. Up to 3 staff members. Additional staff members $480 for virtual/TRCA, $795 for out of office. Combined with ec nica team site ed St - Team -Staff Up ay $77a Up -to -1 day V'550 $e day $2,870 visit above. Incomplete Minor $1,000 No Change submission/unconsolidated All Others $5,000 - $10,000 submission coordination - Per submission Applicant Driven Formal Minor $1,500 No Change Modification Major $5,000 (Requiring re -circulation) Additional Submissions - Each Minor $1,000 No Change submission beyond the third All Others $2,500 - $10,000 submission All applications located in a Special Minor 50% No Change Policy Area (will be charged an Major 100% additional percentage of premium on the applicable fee File Continuation (All Files) Top -up to current cost in fee schedule No Change File Reactivation Standard Files $580 No Change Large Files/OMB $1,100 Waterfront Development additional $1,750 - $3,000 No Change charge for shoreline engineering peer review. Fluvial geomorphic peer review (where required) will be determined on a cost recovery basis as required. GIS Fee $50/hour + HST data preparation $75/hour + HST data preparation Minor Increase to hourly rate to reflect cost of delivering service. $30 + HST per pdf or hard copy digital $30 + HST per pdf or hard copy floodline map sheet (CAD) digital floodline map sheet (CAD) $125 + HST per digital floodline map $125 + HST per digital floodline sheet CAD map sheet CAD Engineering Data Request $100 + HST for HEC -RAS modelling $150 + HST for Hydraulic and/or files associated with each floodline Hydrologic modelling map sheet files/reports $225 + HST per map sheet (Combined $125 + HST per map sheet hydraulic and modelling files Description Fee Notes Optional Terms of Reference Minor $250 No Change Review (EIS, Provincial Plan Major $500-$1,000 conformity, Master Plan - not related to an MESP) technical advisory Archaeological screening $560 + HST $565 + HST Collaborative meetings and $5,000 - $20,000 No Change technical review related to settlement, when applicable TRCA Project Management Fee $5,000 - $20,000 No Change (to assist with coordinating TRCA's reviews and project timelines associated with TRCA reviews) Page 5 of 9 Toronto and Region TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for Conservation PLANNING SERVICES Authority IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Draft — 2021-2022 Proposed Fees Additional Geotechnical and Standard $2,220 No Change Hydrogeology Review and Major $3,300 - $4,975 Source Water Protection - (WHPA-Q) Single Residential *Minor/Standard $350 No Change Scoped Site Plan (ORM Advice Only) $110 Screening letter Moved from top of fee schedule and increased by COLA from $105 to $110. (Residential/Minor projects) Page 6 of 9 TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for Toronto and Region ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and Conservation INFRASTRUCTURE PERMITTING SERVICES Authority February 1aMav 2021 Introduction TRCA's Fee Schedule for Environmental Assessment and Permitting Services was adopted by Resolution (UPDATE ONCE APPROVED). The Fee Schedule was developed in consultation with municipalities through an assessment of service delivery which adheres to the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Policies and Procedures for Charging of Conservation Authority Fees, TRCA's Fees Policy/Guideline 2010, and the range of Environmental Assessment (EA) or Infrastructure Review services consistent with TRCA's Service Delivery Agreements and/or Memoranda of Understanding with area municipalities or agencies. The Fee Schedule includes a broad spectrum of fee categories within each application type to accurately cover the scale of work. The lower fees apply to minor and less complex applications, and modest scale review efforts. Higher fees apply to more complex applications requiring a higher level of EA and technical review. The Fee Schedule also includes fees for services that assist with streamlining processing and approval for the applicant, such as expedited review and red line revisions (where possible). PART 1: General Notes 1. All applications must be deemed complete by TRCA, inclusive of fee submission, prior to commencement of submission processing, unless otherwise approved by TRCA's E -A -Infrastructure Planning and Permits (IPP) Associate Director or the Senier Development and Engineering Services (DES) Director. 2. All environmental assessment (EA) and regulatory approvals under the Conservation Authorities Act (permit application) submissions and associated fees must be administered through the Development and Engineering Services Division of TRCA. 3. Pre sensultatier-application (pre -consultation) - ArOne pre application meeting with TRCA staff to determine the scope of issues for the EA or permit application is recommended for mall applications. TRCA application review fees as per Schedules 1 to 4, attached pmce-- ing fees will be determined based on the a predetermined scope of work identified through the meeting. If the scope of the application changes through the review process, fee adjustments will be determ nedmade. There is no additional fee charged for pre -application review. 4. General inquiries and negotiation of fees will be directed through TRCA's €A -IPP Associate Director or the Sen or D E S Director on issues of interpretation and scoping of work requirements. 5. Fee appeal process - Any dispute of fee calculations that cannot be resolved through consultation with TRCA's Senior DES Director, Planning, Greenspace and Communications (SenieFDES Director) and/or CEO's office, can be appealed through the Budget/Audit Advisory Board and/or the Authority. Delegation format with justification of appeal request is recommended. 6. Any refunds, where applicable, will be approved by the E-A IPP Associate Director or the Sevier Director. 7. The application fee will be paid at the time of filing an application to TRCA. Applications will not be processed until fees are received unless approved by TRCA's €A IPP Associate Director or the Sexier DES Director. 8. TRCA reserves the right to request additional fees or adjust fees should the review require a substantially greater level of effort or for development application scenarios not captured in the Fee Schedule. Custom fees will be negotiated for optional expedited review or unique circumstances for large scale or complex review efforts. Peer reviews may also be required for shoreline works, geotechnical and specialized modeling and may be charged to the applicant. TRCA reserves the right to re -assess fee requirements after one year of processing planning applications. Additional fees can be charged after one year and for excessive delays. 9. Expedited Review Additional Charge applies only to unanticipated circumstances requiring fast -tracked approvals (primarily clearance) and can only be approved by the €A IPP Associate Director or the Senior DES Director as staffing capability allows. 10. Permits are issued for a maximum (standard) time of 2 years. 11. Permits for complex infrastructure can be issued for up to 5 years upon request and with reason. These permits require Executive Committee approval. These permits are subject to additional fees of 50% of the current fee for each additional year (beyond the standard 2 year) to cover compliance monitoring. 12. Permit reissuance (extension) Of 6WGh peFmits may be permitted subject to justification and assessment by staff in accordance with any new updated technical hazard information and the current policies in place. There is no guarantee of automatic approval. Reissuance (extension) is -on a one -time -only basis for up to the same period as the original approved timeframe (e.g., if the original permit was issued for four years, it may be reissued for up to an additional four additieaal-years). Reissuances are subject to reissaaase-fees of 50% of the current fee for each additional year to cover compliance monitoring. Executive Committee approval is TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for Toronto and Region ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and y Conservation INFRASTRUCTURE PERMITTING SERVICES Authority February=', 2O May 2021 13. Applicant must notify TRCA at least 60 days in advance of permit expiration with a request for reissuance Should the permit expire, a new permit application is required. 14. In instances where there are combined applications, e.g., such as site plan review and permit application review - a. If the applications require two separate reviews (i.e., the information submitted is different) and two separate approvals then both fees are applied in accordance with the respective fee schedules. b. If the applications require only one review (i.e., the information submitted is the same for both applications, and within a one-year time frame), the applications are processed and reviewed together and only the highest fee rate applies in accordance with the respective fee schedules. c. If only one review is required as per (b) above, but a separate clearance letter is required for one of the applications, the additional clearance fee is also applied in accordance with the respective fee schedules. d. In the cases where a revision to the permit is requested at the time of permit re -issuance, only the permit re - issuance fee shall apply. 15. TRCA reserves the right to request additional fees should the review require a substantially greater level of effort (e.g., Environmental Management Plan Review). Peer reviews may also be required for shoreline works, geotechnical and specialized modeling and may be charged to the applicant. 16. All application fees (except EA Property Screening or Inquiry) include one initial site visit, if needed, up to 1/2 day for minor or standard files and up to 1 day for major or complex files. 17. Specific Service Delivery Agreements take precedence over the fee schedule. 18. For Class Environmental Assessments, the schedules, or categories specific to the respective class EA document or environmental assessment review procedures of utility boards or commissions, such as oil or gas pipelines, or electricity generation, will be applied. 19. Planning Act application rates can be found in the TRCA Planning Services Fee Schedule. 20. Routine Infrastructure Works Application review is subject to the respective TRCA procedure. 21. Emergency Infrastructure Works Application review is subject to the respective TRCA procedure. 22. Crown agencies and federal undertakings, , ^''�^ '^ ^ ^' ^ ^^ ^', are not bound by the Conservation Authorities Act. Notwithstanding, TRCA encourages the TRCA Voluntary Project Review(VPR) process ma)tbe applied as detailed below in Parts 2 and 3per the Proponents and Projects Exempt from the TRCA Regulatory Approval Process cipsnribed below, and review fees will be charged. It should be noted that other legislation and approvals may apply to these projects and it is the responsibility of the proponent to obtain such approvals. 23. Unless noted in #19 above development activities within regulated areas, watercourses, or wetlands on lands through which an easement, or other form of permission, has been obtained from a crown agency, are not exempt from the regulatory approval process of the Conservation Authorities Act. This includes, but is not limited to private, municipal, gas, oil, electricity, or utility projects. 24. Minor project review means that no or limited technical Natural Heritage Impact Studies and engineering review reports are required as part of the submission, together with detailed design drawings if appropriate; standard project review means that scoped technical studies or reports are required as part of the submission (such as hydrology, ecological, stormwater), together with detailed design drawings if appropriate. Major and complex project review means that comprehensive technical studies or reports are required as part of the submission (such as meander belt, hydrogeology, geotechnical, environmental impact studies) together with detailed design drawings if appropriate. 25. TRCA has extensive environmental and cultural data that is available for use by the proponent, subject to the waiver of a legal disclaimer and the provision of user fees. Where there are data sharing agreements in place, municipalities are exempt from these fees and the data will be provided free of charge. All others are expected to purchase data as per the fee schedule. Current data sharing agreements are in place with all municipalities in the TRCA jurisdiction, as well as the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, and various service agreement partners. 26. TRCA reserves the right to adjust fees based on regulatory or legislative '^^', a o^ rchanges or updates. TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for Toronto and Region ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and Conservation INFRASTRUCTURE PERMITTING SERVICES Authority F taMay 2021 Part 2: Provincial Proponents and Projects Exempt from the Regulatory Approval Process of the R�9-1990, G. 27, AThe following Crown ser-pevatienscorporations or agencies are exempt from the regulatory approval process under Sestie�the Conservation Authorities Act: • Metrolinx • GO Transit Hydra One* Ministry of Transportation including Highways 400, 401, 404, 407* and 412. • Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation (formerly Ontario Realty Corporation or (Infrastructure Ontario) Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Note: Distribution Companies regulated by the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) owned by private corporations, municipalities, utilities, etc. are not exempt. Permits are required in accordance with the regulatory approval process of the Conservation Authorities Act are subject to Ontario Regulation 166106 and all -relevant review fees apply. 2. If development on Crown lands is being undertaken for Crown purposes, the proponent or contractor is not required to obtain a permit through the regulatory approval process of the Conservation Authorities Act. Ir these instances, Crown agencies or their contractors are encouraged to follow the TRCA VPR process. 3. If development on Crown lands is not being undertaken for Crown purposes the proponent or contractor is required to obtain a permit through the regulatory approval process of the Conservation Authorities Act. 4. In the case of utilities, if utilities are being constructed to support a Crown project, the applicant (utility company) is not exempt from the regulatory approval process of the Conservation Authorities Act and permits are required as appropriate. Environmental Assessment Act -Requirements: If projects are subject to a provincial environmental assessment process. review fees will be charged. For example. fees aDDly for the review of aDDlications mad oder the OEB process. 6. Planning Act Requirements: If proponents are subject to review under the Planning Act or seek approval under the Planning Act on a voluntary basis, review fees will be charged. 7. Detailed Design Requirements: These proponents are exempt from the regulatory approval process of the oe^„ ^^ !W06 ^ Rat .^ •^a` as per provisions noted above. 8. TRCA Voluntary Project Review: Proponents are encouraged�seek TRCA review on a voluntary basis. In such cases, TRCA Will Ghargewill charge review fees W ^^^R^^^^^t^ f^• "^ tkne Part 3: Federal Proponents and Projects Exempt from the NSA Regulatory Approval Process of the Conservation Authorities Act Federal undertakings are exempt from the regulatory approval process under Sectien-2S-e�t the Conservation Authorities Act, including: • Railways (Canadian National and Canadian Pacific railways) • Greater Toronto Airport Authority • Radiocommunication and Broadcasting Antenna Systems • PortsToronto (Billy BishoD Toronto Citv Airport. Port of Toronto, and Outer Harbour Marina ) • Parks Canada (Rouge National Urban Park 2 '^ aGSOMAIRSP •V^t`` the ^^Rath^^ TFaR6P9Ftati9R A^t* railways Canadian National Railway and Canadian Pacific Railway are exempt from the regulatory approval process under section 28 of the Conservation TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for Toronto and Region ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and Conservation INFRASTRUCTURE PERMITTING SERVICES Authority Februar�, !, 2O [lay 2021 Authorities Act for works essential to railway operations: • r^^^];^^ N ^t,^^^ Ra 'way _ GARadiaR Parifir y.forks that are ^^"^' t^ •ai way ^^^•^t' These works include, but are not limited to, watercourse alterations and diversions, culvert and bridge modifications, and the construction of tunnels, embankments, bridges and roads. However, the railway is to do as little damage as possible and is to restore watercourses as near as possible to their former condition. 3. Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) is exempt from the regulatory approval process under the Conservation Authorities Act. Note: When a project is not an undertaking of the GTAA, a regulatory approval is required and TRCA review fees apply. 4. In accordance with CPC -2-0-03 — Radiocommunication and Broadcasting Antenna Systems, antenna systems and towers (e.g., Rogers, BellBBll and TELLIS), are exempt from Environmental Assessment Act, Planning Act, and S^^to ^t^t the Conservation Authorities Act processes and requirements and are the direct responsibility of Industry Canada. Notwithstanding, there are provisions for stakeholder consultation that generally apply to all new towers greater than 15 metres in height. Proponents of these facilities, which include towers and antennas as well as access roads, utilities, etc. will often use the site plan process under the Planning Act to facilitate such communication. Permits under the regulatory approval process of the Conservation Authorities Act are not required for these Droiects. Telecommunication providers or their contractors are encouraged to follow the TRCA VPR process. 2. PortsToronto is a Crown agency established for the purpose of operating the Port of Toronto. The Port Authority possesses legislated responsibility for all its port activities related to shipping, navigation, transportation of passengers and goods, and the handling and storage of cargo. It owns and operates the Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport, the Port of Toronto (consisting of Marine Terminal 51, Warehouse 52, and the Cruise Ship Terminal) and the Outer Harbour Marina. PortsToronto is exempt from the regulatory approval process under the Conservation Authorities Act for all works on their property. Lands regulated by Ports Toronto, but not owned by PortsToronto are not exempt from the regulatory approval process under the Conservation Authorities Act and are required to obtain permits. Please see below "Lake Ontario', below, for further information. 3. Works undertaken by Parks Canada are exempt from the regulatory approval process under the Conservation Authorities Act and are encouraged to follow the TRCA VPR process. Note: When a project is not a federal undertaking, Parks Canada may require others working on their lands follow the TRCA VPR Review process and TRCA review fees will apply. Note: Downsview Park is not regulated by TRCA. 4. Environmental Assessment Ast-Requirements: If projects are subject to a federal environmental assessment process, review fees will be charged. 5. Planning Act Requirements: If proponents seek approval under the Planning Act on a voluntary basis, review fees will be charged. 6. Detailed Design Requirements: These proponents are exempt from the TRCA regulatory approval process of as per provisions noted above. 7. TRCA Voluntary Project Review: Proponents may seek TRCA review on a voluntary basis. In such cases, TRCA will charge review fees to compensate for its time. Part 4: National and Ontario Energy Board Applications 1. National and Ontario Energy Board Applications are a matter of exclusive federal or provincial jurisdiction, respectively, with the board itself being responsible for all decisions. Through these processes, proponents are required to consult community stakeholders, including conservation authorities. TRCA can choose to comment on these applications through the commenting process established by the NEB or OEB. While there are no provisions that would allow TRCA to charge review fees for participation in a NEB or OEB process, if conditions for NEB or OEB approval specifically require TRCA involvement, appropriate fees will be negotiated on a project -specific basis. 2. On a case-by-case basis, an NEB or OEB application may also be subject to the federal or provincial Environmental Assessment Act. In these cases, the appropriate review fee will be charged. 3. These projects are not exempt from provisions under the Conservation Authorities Act and as such, proponents are not exempt from review fees or the regulatory approval process of the Conservation Authorities Act. TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for�� Toronto and Region ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and W. Conservation INFRASTRUCTURE PERMITTING SERVICES Authority F BaMay 2021 Part 4: Hydro One and Ontario Power Generation 2. It is acknowledged that conservation authorities may charge review fees. Permission to enter is required for works on conservation authority -owned lands, including access. Note that the MOU may be subject to review and update or change. TRCA should be consulted on an application-bv-application basis. Part 5: Lake Ontario 1. TRCA regulatory authority extends to its jurisdictional boundary, which in the case of Lake Ontario is the international boundary. Privately owned sections of the bed of Lake Ontario are subject to the regulatory approval process of the Conservation Authorities Act. In areas where the bed of Lake Ontario is considered Crown land, provisions as per above Provincial and Federal Proponents and Projects Exempt from the TRCA Regulatory Approval Process apply. 2. Lands located in the Central Toronto Waterfront area, shown as the "Toronto Waterfront Screening Area' on the TRCA Regulation Mapping and including the Toronto Islands, are exempt from regulatory approvals under the Conservation Authorities Act. TRCA reviews environmental assessment and Planning Act applications and review fees apply. At the detailed design stage, TRCA encourages the TRCA VPR process to be followed as appropriate. Note: The regulation applies to areas subject to flooding from the Don River. Alterations to the shoreline on the Central Waterfront area are exempt, and VPR is recommended. Part 6: Other Federal and Provincial Approvals 1. Proponents are responsible for obtaining appropriate approvals independent of TRCA, including but not limited to Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act, Endangered Species Act, Fisheries Act and Navigable Waters Act. Part 7: Definitions The following definitions apply to applications made in accordance with the Environmental Assessment and Infrastructure Permitting Services fee schedule: a) Clearance Letter — projects that do not affect the program or policy interests of TRCA and for which a clearance letter is being requested for the review of standalone plans, or technical reports and studies, often at the request of the proponent or other approval agencies or municipalities. Site visits, meetings and technical or policy review are not included; one submission of screening information is included. If the submission materials are updated or amended, a new fee will be applied. b) Screening Assessment — projects for which a letter is required from TRCA, but the proposal does not affect the program or policy interests of TRCA, and technical review comments are not required. One submission is included. If the submission materials are updated or amended, a new fee will be applied. Site visits and meetings are not included. If a site visit or meeting is required, additional site visit or meeting fees will be applied. c) Minor — projects that require scoped technical review with a TRCA Planner and up to one TRCA technical staff member. Meetings, submission, and site visit details are noted below, after which additional fees will apply. Additional fees will also apply for incomplete/unconsolidated submissions. • Master Plans and Environmental Assessments - planner/technical reviewer to attend up to one technical advisory meeting (if applicable), one meeting with proponent and consultant, and one site visit. TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for �` Toronto and Region ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and ,.,*, Conservation INFRASTRUCTURE PERMITTING SERVICES Authority February =', 2O May 2021 d) e) f) g) h) • Voluntary Project Review, Detailed Design and Permits (includes up to one meeting and one site visit): • IEA, Schedule BIC or Equivalent - Up to three submissions (initial, response and final) are included. • Schedule A/A+, Routine Infrastructure Works or Equivalent, and Environmental Management Plans - Up to two submissions (initial and final) are included. Standard — projects that require scoped technical review with a TRCA Planner and two TRCA technical staff members. Meetings, submission, and site visit details are noted below, after which additional fees will apply. Additional fees will also apply for incomplete/unconsolidated submissions. • Master Plans and Environmental Assessments - planner/technical reviewer to attend up to three technical advisory meetings (if applicable), three meetings, and one site visit is included. • Voluntary Project Review, Detailed Design and Permits (includes up to one meeting and one site visit): • IEA, Schedule BIC or Equivalent, and Environmental Management Plans - Up to three submissions (initial, response and final) are included. • Schedule A/A+, Routine Infrastructure Works or Equivalent - Up to two submissions (initial and final) are included. Major — projects that require multi -disciplinary technical review with a TRCA Planner and three TRCA technical staff members. Meetings, submission, and site visit details are noted below, after which additional fees will apply. Additional fees will also apply for incomplete/unconsolidated submissions. • Master Plans and Environmental Assessments - planner/technical reviewer to attend up to three technical advisory meeting (if applicable), three meetings, and one site visit is included. • Voluntary Project Review, Detailed Design and Permits (includes up to two meetings and one site visit): • IEA, Schedule BIC or Equivalent, and Environmental Management Plans - Up to three submissions (initial, response and final) are included. • Schedule A/A+, Routine Infrastructure Works or Equivalent - Up to two submissions (initial and final) are included. Complex — projects that require multi -disciplinary technical review with a TRCA Planner and four TRCA technical staff members. Meetings, submission, and site visit details are noted below, after which additional fees will apply. Additional fees will also apply for incomplete/unconsolidated submissions. Master Plans and Environmental Assessments - planner/technical reviewer to attend up to three technical advisory meeting (if applicable), three meetings, and one site visit is included. • Voluntary Project Review, Detailed Design and Permits (includes up to two meetings and one site visit): • IEA, Schedule BIC or Equivalent, and Environmental Management Plans - Up to three submissions (initial, response and final) are included. • Schedule A/A+, or Equivalent - Up to two submissions (initial and final) are included. Additional Meeting and Site Visit Charges — Additional charges for meetings and site visits are applied in accordance with the additional meetings and site visit fees prescribed in this Fee Schedule. Note: Additional charges will apply for additional meetings or site visits will apply for additional meetings or site visits. Additional meetings will be assessed the same fee as additional site visits, inclusive of travel and preparation time, in accordance with the site visit fees identified herein. TRCA encourages remote meeting using digital technologies, including conference calls and "GO TO" or equivalent meetings. If travel time is not required, the meeting charges are reduced. Incomplete/unconsolidated Submissions - A submission for review is deemed to be "incomplete" when the application has not met all requirements identified by TRCA. The following scenarios are examples of situations in which an application may be deemed incomplete or unconsolidated: 1. where all technical or supporting studies that are required to meet TRCA's submission requirements have not been provided with the application; 2. where component studies are submitted in a piecemeal fashion; 3. where the findings and analysis in component reports are not integrated in a multi -discipline submission (e.g., where an Environmental Impact Study and Hydrogeological report are packaged together and each report has not considered the findings of the others). File Continuation - Applicable to files that continue beyond two years from the date of submission of the application. At two years, and at two-year intervals thereafter, if the applications are still in the review or approval process, application fees will need to be topped -up to current fees in the applicable fee schedule at that time. Review of the need for any additional fee requirements is to be completed through a re-evaluation of the status of the application and scope of the review remaining. TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and INFRASTRUCTURE PERMITTING SERVICES FebFuary=', ?8 May 2021 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Schedule 1: Fee Schedule for Environmental Assessment Act* Review ('or similar legislation as appropriate) Rppidedbn Type 2018 Appli cation F« Hit 1I ... a Application Fee %change ROY. (Ro{mM Reyne n! In Rea) Screening or Inquiry aN. rn$xa pwrnr«rp so«nq or m5pey Mom Eyz1. e% Yraatl p.�ah6.In�n«e katlanRMex toner 1111.3. m,n,r $1 Bx sm eat 91eMva 82;BT9:W btlefvnn.hear nnae in year;. -311% x pYa aPM MYw rmiv EPgsO.Po w� # aRoo n0% -.1. EB1.ano.W 'C Ibo Mind. 11 binnedtanybeindan bodandl E4 E915NA0 "y"... 8ubl«rluna2oned. BY,n 6$.000 Miner $10,Og6do 51 ..eN 19 ed SImMa Math]. S% Iande"I Catty NNuk CwgaF&eat 'ear62.1a55.WRI 833A25.m v6. MMrmm noebena 6a;e36m Rtlnote �nne IRIonbineelona Rasa Wait. .31x 1-1 'f obtained ata I'd 8..00 bee, {B,z.. nbeloban detainee a0% neniand W nldpel Clua EIr— 6MM uN B m Rau W 9nl MRm over Et2a8 ba babbabe S1&asst. u% Carw t aboyed .be 3144W b0 E1Aa0. vi M1WIw 62,915D0 Mleem gAB3N S% FANWnaun RRswb 9YrtlnE f9.Y600 "I ad mpA.06 dying. AtlaNaul Clre! u wv S1A]B60 "1 .111 yY'n°' E3.9w.m onr Cek9onn bpannad bmm .. nra'nte'd &.yoieO tldxM rale Seem MaeMY60e NNGarpu mwY a`Fe.aenuem..p m lw planner na no to M lance .Yxwlllaiden emaenn.laml.aboboya, maamodnu R, I Iter if pinna, M1Waltrmplu 58.11000 mpg'mbar N3ed. ramaaA mMw®le«4.debate In, been PI— III aren entoo 9Mama numbs a. -.,a ere III n EA wNN Mnnlsan upmV aadu Et,w0.0o 2dallfpMn°r' Ef.eBB.m °e^'Tdahany Zd'ti^m meenea trey at bb.- an a uMVe) ugeaes „rgmsn'erepa. Scndbod mMN9. glen' M lS ipantl b:tl etlael«.Iemt .'an-asrema.. m;. Fa MRanGnw« fitaaxpp 6.n mamnYra w,a aw9.m axmnal Men�na cnnrPea �,°n"rYrm«m9anr nr.m9e na.game aevea redeem as npmtal by tin ncllen armdmnla Y,m:n. na!- "r'ad�e �p���me,awr-�.a o-renor Feeeeaaeme dP3mv11 Plamer•uPmme nfneavanama E1pB.ap _ E2bls.w be to.'.."an.,a bpsa--Rad flMMu due d, e tldmd..m r«mrm,.aadeate «ewer f«. n. raonanya Imea yarR.dRoane, 1191. m:r9tl on—parabob Mxea MabMel 1. lobbbe 1.1.1. yed.. III a.mmm a applkWl.µ yondand ye— a.nbmualm aninn beaupal to Royea r.tnmvl.n pv..pn.unr anal.", a don -a Inaboal a eAlPP a—layeeb- .r..e«ia.tree...«wwueedYl.n.. m.andalt �r«aa.�m:damnn 1b, by tett tette trona prap.reb bet eta Moldy banned In b n."aK t etaln„a ma9e.w16eaek one to aeaebma. B per reuMw. m. p.l«u m9 ma9ela P ed bee"tl rW I. .,an Wlb. a.lermntlmrml reavery bbee.peen yP recew or —0~ Y P,_ badbe uuxtl�n nbyinne. yea. a,R bei Ind., nGWF01«ae urate nr no—an, g ream. l wn anw. ne", a. abon. , wa«ngv ev.enF9l.n Tey. l.w rynbOAANea9uea ton", Ebm Floarsi di Id ba.na # «.rma ee term Pe«uwn abennnw®nadrr9. 'ebt®ek� bus n.y.a rd.n.n.«1apw+mlg.il�rc.mwre® rept m. "andatl newaanbmenm w.mIn Ye(1)boaabanned tlxtl `a.M. manpletble on, 1. at dna anybeeiben FaanoR Rabbinate pbnrnr aea,naa remade DII 11 aeb etab'dk ta Me not nmreueg�M� ars rmm the R.fmllnu IK R.) t one In fee aaule mu MwaNeNa TnpnT.tenew Te, la beenl m maearlvappl 8« mllen)pan ed boy, P«nervnP tun a. It ws beetl'''e TRCA gaY or Modellingg •SSPTa1• RI day beenedlon siLMun R6reWpnaboden {t5 Yaloped«. 1,11dar a nn andNdeml Roamd Feeam. end ..133- nR Pa . Par an nw.aay 0IIiI . Ne• Nn pa.abb, band bey,dgnal G'6 Fw toline nup. I.) awateemep an. ICM) 0% .eMc9 pret lana -be emmpt •$I tt.rrsT Ras a tied. m err.p . 6f25.RST par tied nand It,. mq p% • $1.-ry T by Hal. bednlinedl« • 11 idThe bonal—ober on. Red one nepahen rltbanneb...udYWaa I'd dandan 2M.. Mlnklry of N-. Pewnaena FdaeM, ma Enynana Rate "ban • tend -HST R, mm men lo+rmined Etn. rvnTandlRye haeme mqe 31o0.m eeameeatp thenal nWbent n n heal TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for Toronto and Region ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and y Conservation INFRASTRUCTURE PERMITTING SERVICES Authority February =1, 2O May 2021 Schedule 2: Fee Schedule for Permit Review as per the Regulatory Approval Process of the Conservation Authorities Act Ontario Regulation , GAIN o,,...,:. and Voluntary Project Review Applications Rete. Mp11w8os Type 2018 AppllnXon Fee 2021 Proposed Pppllcallan Fes %cban0e (Fopoeed ffdmm u In Retll Scandal or Clorana 9mm Includ.d nmi® maluded In 9crasn'mpltlan r,—. a..- o1 I9rr FBr.am no,anne Msvrnad int M1enlent. m.x,pmmilni. rWnirtl, M.r ery T In. a.. M1mn om. sa+nop an.r seas.. Sw lna Damsit.-las. Modal MO. in sarrk'..preemnr _ sem. prearewn _ . r»s.xa. pNrwrv....aw. Sea."¢Ian Mnor $Ism .Mnor Y+,mS.m . Epnwae pal dumas an, ,bmn,im .saran. l.anar Ne mmaax,svn.rea.same. ans, 1. re ,at a.. at:arntwypmaMrmew (sawn mad mama.. .1 been Melo u,ses.ap Abjar 12.1p..SV^ .am..as. d uM.Naxl an 1, In. Wunbry ploled rvAmYam apply Appliaal Renems. nerrtre r Is muf.m alum, . Is'.af 5% Mna Iss l. an Mnor lu"I'd 5% MInwOellwymaumn pw submhabre Mtl Ind.d . da lapel Class I..ff.3 s CndWln funds, $9,2POWSWaaN 38.]25.. 5% nM1nnuayanurfs'..- .'s. .1, asuman ma, arpuNtlsr eubrunmas(ndl On0 fnelf f ma, $13SM.. ya.r S1).]10.00 M 'Cnmpin ..'u- •A lwalmsYaapeuylcdla—sam rsldM to alaaead $1.100. I'll'. gy numplusay tlm. maIna_du. Ccmplev p—as, up to 5 ya— (Ounmaapplym.1unruyPmj-f Rmlewl 1.% rm 11 perms, pms'A%M wmmt fiFwtiKfaranan grpma&hmpWmtl (mall pelmMbbe Nob: Tay, lane Ina a.nead. fardaasmlbn b¢ mr am adtllncnel Y.. of ammn Iamretl.1 a parktloltlas a.., ..a Ne mslmum to wpp. N. dow mens last .1 lor.azam sausm. (us . 51.and) Rbnawdl nam, P. up as..Dams. of law wars. «', m.. m.a Inman pars 2mff. seMcapDreemenr n, ..Olen;. (.Bream." $1.9m.. Sx Mnm an 1. un Mnar 5]am.m SA Munbpd claaa .1., 1. aA.w nbnaud KandW days.1"Im". ,5^5 Ep9u'eae oaN.ry es••m.a No.ubmaYm. Pneaam, Ina, eauawlml Alda $amS.a, war $].sp, ap Sx Sermfareamenr 39IOW.Pgree. s9il.. sx Mn. Mnw $10W W sum-nd b.,n® 41.Po.SOW i0% slam® ms and FauN. nndamus Va. awl... re ui GASeMce Deanery mmrmea M subm¢.bns(madfly noel) .dmJ .,my, u¢e¢ID13 $1,385.. 5% WayR', SBS.. AMarfm pauss.aylnammaun Wob WdIWnP 1W%al ward as, matrpueemenb af IBCA Emegmay lnlMWdu re sums Pmowl. IndudM in Ism,ann ps. piMp. und'., semceass—t .gream.Fnwomm,l "min agreement p,Mrs,m®mlmF fami;@..I., ..". wuaeluIa2018M1nvnor ya.p3p.m Ec'. m«mres manalnlcns. M EW my he refulrM as pan Own... new a¢ X k dbect nq uhamen of 59.2%5 OG smlord $glmpp Mtne PwmXP.y. cr MRs ar g19.]p5.pp Ma o. 315.9JO.Wbay.11 apply. $17.. Is Capra. $10.780.00 6% Additional Charged xx W wmat fee rmettYt eaerdon.l 25%M aammtnaM—h ,1a--, MOs4nal auhmnabi¢ Yubm1¢tlm submhsim b "' day" Planner. Mnw $1.W5. P 82'&tl'. Cmyam UDdeltl"I manml eXe W¢IlbncludMmpMal NeapDlluWn rerYw Sbndard M.]So.W Eacna dnuny mvr gmJ.W .ad-. R. NN+ Cnam.s n•d' bat--ameuptatwopNnnwsandupbMalecnnlwl NeRummend. O,WMnd neHae I.Ind..aan . re uplat esus pl ser ntrywlCamplev $9,320.. m2 r.wn.rs Kan, pa wcov "a mvlern9 rle«u ecnu0ed mrrli psm,. EmM1 andbunel mn Km.. Nnual eras TRtl da..' NrNu namand numauol m,smr mss imu.man in EAstendu6 Mnal3bndud $1,Mp,W Wt a 112 day 1 PIannlm�a g1,W5W emlcad&Ivry lddnbnd meelnpa meY lra rWuhdNme u b2maie , Qamam prePonan.ansuxl 5enadulad...,a ere planned for lS updalM bled nwrt: lees"atal. Wdllm. tame. lae na reNnv Myamampus f1.nA5"m ECM1 eddNvnm remv 59m.m addl—s..a C., n wN urs."Porahmer meann05 m.—sas nM npumrp ma—a manes, loss man, ne reduud as appmmtl by me w In Gand CmeultaM a Mumnar qam M[rYm fns altar Mr Ola.e'. emwnry IPPA—undu0sms,aaiwm SID—mr Finaaamrta Ilpwl Oay 11 pl an— Mnwl3bndv0 $1.9]5.. m'us I 43,815. afuanr mcdeln9 upbMpl—armannOty.db0nk&. stadayll.f. l! Maivrtl tlaflem ..lire., mtl'Norel mmanerfMs ma AYjmfamplm f2, is.m Each eeeaunan S]m mv0ea (m eiaM1 pars.. nymmutO.wlopmen+MpllmY doge lu Pow whew d ecabl.spans pwp»f kr 1—nal—l—¢tslremaprepurad. shuman,en0imninO Par reran. —Imajxis stuand emauss Manumd ham- will Ins,tlerm ae byes ,ais. e antl m a usb Pssa ms"n, al auNN Osamundo0lm waLeaarrm ntemlm aeawlaml aerp.mr Dmp.rtemwlmc.r«.n.mlm Manlmwanara.awlll b. aeammmmaa+rewmy 1-1.ansm«xnq peer..New. may be rPouIr. .¢ rwarM. .. -TCssar .Inas. mcwdiO adds urea,. mnma, pmmnt.1--ler Aen., ow ask.. .poisesartAmaflu dsoesnin0by,T;CA aaaam lo9 MAemlo9y Sawn lay(on TRSAwnetl Lands $55"00•X5 $SnSdMXST $s T ram"Na aa—.. Drmaca. me"mu"atwlll Only) satermine llmrnammadmina lannulrea. sculls fines wul be amara. f. awnaeaoal. InwNlPasona vAsre r.gwma IatllImmd 1. Pmnamde miuNle I- Mtlldm,l+m%pnmlum M apps®ulaM Epa+nea rame of¢ubmeNm unhan M(2) wMu n suble" EapNpm Revleu PoY¢umayll. pa Oars.Mlm SS fa mimrilly of dy" and eppmwl M GAIPP mums Olresta or Seae•CElf Dlre. Y ww . YI— MPllplansmnla m nl as mat mMmue m W na tau Y� On ba 11. Car um, wl Fl«) TapuP to cumat sand in be manure TaP'up. cumM wW n be a h.l. date d¢ueml—MN...Imon. s«OeXn., a)an aanermwnm awmem m MN.. TRCA Crab or Madellln0 •§SNnwr.n3TdWpmpawtM • a]Naur I HST days prewrNbn $2b alp Maniaam—, M, an, M Natam Ramunn and Fmm,,, and . MST pm.par mnW wpy du*O $3p. HST par Of m hand amr dflir9 Fa. ;am afi me mw¢Imn(—) pace Ime-as smart(—) OR aeric.. a9raynat Damcers man mm, • $125. Msr P.r did. llocE m. m y • $125.X Or dlglbl I. lm. ma an. .n.d (C�1 (ccm) � •sl..nsrMNEC.11'. 1.cess aa esmYtlM wlN e«n baW llnemap ¢nM 0.1.ydmusamtlm XydMrykmMeing fllegrepme 4W MunkpalsleR Mln'r¢+ry. of Nam. Rewumn antl FaeLry, and FnglneMrP O.b R«uesl eadaeasnammt aam Dan. —I • U25. MSP map Mm.t(caneinm ZOIn9 S125+XSi PortllOMlnmYlnemep srr«I �$1... nyamadc and ales) TRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and INFRASTRUCTURE PERMITTING SERVICES February 1,2BaMay 2021 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Schedule 3: Fee Schedule for Permit and Voluntary Project Review Revisions and Permit Reissuances (Extensions) Note: Permit Reissuances (Extensions) does not apply to Voluntary Project Review Applicants. Type 2018 Applicable. Fee 2021 Proposed Application Fee %change Notes Permit Nen-Crmplynce-Umauumbed Were; ltldlbpnal loo%of applicable perms fee w Additional 100% afapplicebfop le permeprime 0% (Proposed Revisions In Red) henor/Standard change 25% of cement fee Minor/S rite and change .25%ofcurrem fee 0% headed, additional site vial tee will be deal Revision to Ontario Regulation 10&08 Permit or Major/Complex change Major/Complex change Fee to resolve each Issue, troopers of permit revision fee. Fee Veterans Prcryed Renew EA Senate, Delivery assumes two subrrvssions. Additional 50% of applicable peart Me' 50%ofcumentfee 50%euunentfop 0% pope will be charged, Review of Long -tern Site Monilering Reports (1- See G¢neral Nor¢s p12 on page 1. In all cases, permit per euan. (E tension) to ReImAt JFmrie- To be determined 0% Subject to negotiation reissuance (extentension) cannot be grantee for a period of ReguHllen-1G0IB5aPermitReveuanee(one- 50% of currentfee for each adalbonal year 50% of current fee for each addriional year 011, time greater than the Original pe'mit. Note Exer"ve time only) To be deleparted To be determined Committee approval Is required for all rmssuance (etansion) Subject M deposition term rnnllocing requests rested to permits Mat were criginnally Issued beyond the maximum (at cases) two-year period. Extuldad Permit Reetaion or ReJasuahce Mandrel 50% premium of applliable Mehemet 50% premium of applicable revision Additional fees will be charged to prelaols where ongoing Examined ravlso of submission wHfin 2 weeks of request (Etenslon) with Repeaters rescan or reissuance top ormailmen. fee. 0% subject to availability of staff and approval of IPP Associate compliance warrents follow-up.Sits'. Additional Site was Charges (azsumes 1 stall) Director or DES Director, are walJosd allows. 1. Up to two site wage are Included as part of Me initial permit at 'heriesTmmSWindew-Egeasiewiaee9tiazd Ifaailiard Rome add (service no longer presilad Or caluntary pe jt d renew appliciion. amMg'xindewaxadiRcfidr Schedule 4: Fee Schedule for Compliance Monitoring Application Type 2018 Application Fare 2021 Proposed Application Fee %change Notes (Proposed Revisions In Red) Permit Nen-Crmplynce-Umauumbed Were; ltldlbpnal loo%of applicable perms fee w Additional 100% afapplicebfop le permeprime 0% Fee to veeolva each Issue. Fee Includes up to two site arm, As reed headed, additional site vial tee will be deal Fee to resolve each Issue, troopers of permit revision fee. Fee Permit Non-CanpHance- puthmlasd Worcs ltldl0cnal 50% of applicable prtmlt fee Additional 50% of applicable peart Me' M Includes up to two see visite. As needed, addltanal site visit pope will be charged, Review of Long -tern Site Monilering Reports (1- To be dowmanetl To be determined 0% Subject to negotiation 3 years) $1.Vier, and Meeldle assodeed win Lunger- To be deleparted To be determined 0% Subject M deposition term rnnllocing up to A day Additional fees will be charged to prelaols where ongoing up to S day $910.00 Increased to recognize level of $1,170.00 30% compliance warrents follow-up.Sits'. Additional Site was Charges (azsumes 1 stall) war, achpHed 1. Up to two site wage are Included as part of Me initial permit Or caluntary pe jt d renew appliciion. Each additional svewe $60000 2. Up to one site vises No h lndudetl In the radial fee. 3. up to one rile Wait fee is induced In the permit up to 1 day slssuanceletendon fee. up to 1 day $1,620.00 Decreased to recognize level of $1,500.00 S% workreluaed Each addHicnal renewer lbal EnWrenmtmel Management Plan Complierwe To be cateminal To be dampest 0% SubjeclionegoYetem Renew of Compliance Reports. Included in Me permit career had Included in Me permit renew fee 0% Review and comment an compllance spats as related Mrcugh Me pappea ing or Voluntary project Renew pressures. Negotiated RazM29m Agreements IT. be communist! To be determined! 0% Based on Me space of compliance Issue. Note: Small agreement partes are not exampl tram Compliance ManllWng Fees unless 0% olhmWe noted In apecdk agreements. Appendix 6: Planning Applications Received 2016-2020 by Municipality 100 Pia+ �°,b PJ 111 IIIIIII 20000 207 03 ■ ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 ■ 2020 Appendix 7: Permit Applications Received by Municipality 2016-2020 250 150 oc 'F &a o� ZJ� �c•' ea\ ��•' id� ac a+ oc o�`a�Qc oJrS``pcc�`�,('°F�Jca°° SAd`�o &A IN Q ` , , C°ik ca , o°co P°\y�c 4`a\QaJt � r`�c AO` LoF oN�'oa 0&ove co°` w a 3c ° E"°�`` tion °i° 0 AO L` ■ 2016 B,2017- 02018 2017_ ■2018 ■ 2019 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 City of Brampton 67 74 96 82 105 City of Markham 86 97 67 79 86 City of Mississauga 18 28 26 38 26 City of Pickering 59 63 56 78 82 City of Richmond Hill 125 101 76 68 86 City of Toronto (Etobicoke York) 227 211 181 161 139 City of Toronto (North York) 142 134 149 127 125 City of Toronto (Scarborough) 96 98 90 101 87 City of Toronto (Toronto and East York) 125 120 116 128 134 City of Vaughan 152 203 143 142 141 Town of Ajax 34 62 20 31 25 Town of Caledon 81 129 82 79 102 Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville 34 37 28 23 30 Township of King 29 62 53 72 55 Township of Uxbridge 23 3 0 2 2 Township of Adjala-Tosorontio/ Town of Mono 0 5 1 0 1 Town of Aurora 0 1 0 0 0 RES.#B44/21 - VENDORS OF RECORD ARRANGEMENT FOR SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF VARIOUS AGGREGATES Award of Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 10035681 for a Vendors of Record (VOR) arrangement for supply and delivery of various aggregates from July 1, 2021 to July 1, 2022. Moved by: Xiao Han Seconded by: Jack Heath THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is engaged in a variety of programs/projects that require various aggregates; AND WHEREAS TRCA solicited proposals through a publicly advertised process and evaluated the proposals based on the criteria outlined in this report; THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT TRCA staff be directed to establish a Vendors of Record arrangement with Atlantis Marine Construction Canada Inc., Dufferin Aggregates, A Division of CRH Canada Group Inc., Elite Stone Quarries Ltd., Glenn Windrem Trucking, J.C. Rock Ltd, James Dick Construction Limited, Natural Stone Source Ontario Ltd., and Strada Aggregates Inc. for the supply and delivery of various aggregates for one (1) year at a total cost not to exceed $1,912,726, plus applicable taxes, to be expended as authorized by TRCA staff; THAT TRCA staff be authorized to approve additional expenditures to a maximum of $286,909 (approximately 15% of the anticipated expenditures), plus applicable taxes, in excess of the contract cost as a contingency allowance if deemed necessary; THAT TRCA staff have the option to extend the term of the contract by one (1) year, pending further Board of Director approval; THAT should TRCA staff be unable to negotiate a contract with the above-mentioned Proponents, staff be authorized to enter into and conclude contract negotiations with other Proponents that submitted Proposals, beginning with the next highest ranked Proponent meeting TRCA specifications; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to implement the contract, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA requires supply and delivery of various aggregates for implementation in a variety of engineering, habitat restoration and trail building projects throughout TRCA's jurisdiction. These aggregates are crucial to constructing a variety of erosion and sediment control structures, as well as a variety of other engineered structures which TRCA builds and maintains as part of its works. Aggregate required include granular materials, gabion, rip -rap, armour stones and round stones. By establishing a Vendors of Record ("VOR") arrangement for the supply and delivery of these aggregates, Vendors are authorized to provide these goods and services for a defined period of time and with fixed pricing. In accordance with the contract documents for this VOR arrangement, staff may contact a Vendor on the list with the aggregate and delivery turn -around times required for their project with a value up to $500,000 per aggregate type and size per project. Goods and services above this threshold will be procured through a separate competition and are subject to TRCA's Procurement Policy. Vendors will provide all resources required to service the divisional or program needs in accordance with applicable laws, codes, standards, and terms and conditions of the VOR agreement. The term of this Vendors of Record arrangement is for one (1) year. TRCA has the option to extend for an additional year, pending additional Board of Director at a later date. RATIONALE RFP documentation was posted on the public procurement website www.biddingo.com on March 11, 2021 and closed on April 5, 2021. A total of thirty-two (32) firms downloaded the documents and eleven (11) proposals were received from the following Proponent(s): • Atlantis Marine Construction Canada Inc. • Dufferin Aggregates, A Division of CRH Canada Group Inc. • Elite Stone Quarries Ltd. • Glenn Windrem Trucking • Gott Natural Stone'99 Inc. • Green's Haulage • J.C. Rock Ltd • James Dick Construction Limited • Natural Stone Source Ontario Ltd. • Rill Products Inc. • Strada Aggregates Inc. The Proposal from Rill Products inc. was disqualified because it did not meet the mandatory criteria listed in the RFP. An Evaluation Committee comprised of senior staff from the Restoration & Infrastructure division reviewed the Proposals on April 9, 2021. The criteria used to evaluate and select the recommended Proponents included the following: Criteria Maximum Score Minimum Score Proponent Information and Profile 10 Scope of Work Capabilities 15 Organizational Experience 25 Sub -Total 50 20 Pricing 50 Sub -Total 50 otal Points 100 Proponents had the option to provide pricing for up to four (4) different categories of aggregates. The four (4) highest scoring Proponents for each aggregate category are recommended for contract award and are listed as follows (ordered alphabetically): CATEGORY 1: GRANULAR • Dufferin Aggregates, A Division of CRH Canada Group Inc. • Glenn Windrem Trucking • James Dick Construction Limited • Strada Aggregates Inc. CATEGORY 2: GABION AND RIP -RAP • Dufferin Aggregates, A Division of CRH Canada Group Inc. • Glenn Windrem Trucking • J.C. Rock Ltd • Natural Stone Source Ontario Ltd. CATEGORY 3: ARMOUR STONE • Atlantis Marine Construction Canada Inc. • Elite Stone Quarries Ltd. • Glenn Windrem Trucking • Natural Stone Source Ontario Ltd. CATEGORY 4: ROUND STONE • Dufferin Aggregates, A Division of CRH Canada Group Inc. • Glenn Windrem Trucking • J.C. Rock Ltd • Strada Aggregates Inc. Through the evaluation process it was determined that Atlantis Marine Construction Canada Inc., Dufferin Aggregates, A Division of CRH Canada Group Inc., Elite Stone Quarries Ltd., Glenn Windrem Trucking, J.C. Rock Ltd, James Dick Construction Limited, Natural Stone Source Ontario, and Strada Aggregates are one of the four (4) highest scoring Vendors for each aggregate category, meeting the qualifications and requirements set out in the RFP. Therefore, it is recommended that contract No. 10035681 be awarded to Atlantis Marine Construction Canada Inc., Dufferin Aggregates, A Division of CRH Canada Group Inc., Elite Stone Quarries Ltd., Glenn Windrem Trucking, J.C. Rock Ltd, James Dick Construction Limited, Natural Stone Source Ontario Ltd., and Strada Aggregates Inc. at a total cost not to exceed $1,912,726, plus 15% contingency, plus applicable taxes, over the initial one (1) year term. Proponent's scores and staff analysis of the evaluation results can be provided in an in -camera presentation, upon request. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategic priority set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 7 — Build partnerships and new business models Strategy 2 — Manage our regional water resources for current and future generations FINANCIAL DETAILS Based upon expenditures during the previous VOR contract (2019-2021), the anticipated value of the requested goods and services under this contract is anticipated to be approximately $1,912,726, plus applicable taxes for the initial one (1) year term. An increase or decrease in workload will have an impact on the value of this contract. All Vendors on the VOR list understand both the potential cost and resource implications associated with changes in workload. Goods and services will be provided on an "as required" basis with no minimum orders guaranteed. Funds for this contract are identified in a variety of capital and cost recoverable project accounts. Report prepared by: Alex Barber, extension 5388 Email: alex.barberCZDtrca.ca For Information contact: Alex Barber, extension 5388 Email: alex.barber(a)trca.ca Date: April 12, 2021 RES.#B45/21 - REQUEST FOR LIMITING DISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY -OWNED LAND Receipt of a request from Kingbird Developments Inc., to enter into a Limiting Distance Agreement for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority -owned lands located on the north side of Marine Parade Drive and east of Park Lawn Road municipally known as 156 Marine Parade Drive, in the City of Toronto, Lake Ontario Waterfront (CFN 63120). Moved by: Xiao Han Seconded by: Jack Heath THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) enter into a Limiting Distance Agreement with Kingbird Developments Inc. relating to TRCA owned land containing a total of 0.005 hectares (0.013 acres), more or less, of vacant land, described as Part 1 and 2, draft plan submitted by R -PE Surveying Ltd., City of Toronto; THAT consideration of Seventy -Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000) be paid to TRCA by Kingbird Developments Inc. for the Limiting Distance Agreement; THAT the Limiting Distance Agreement be executed at the earliest possible date and all reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the execution of the agreement are to be paid by Kingbird Developments Inc.; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including obtaining any necessary approvals and signing and execution of documentation. CARRIED BACKGROUND Kingbird Developments Inc. has formally requested that TRCA and the City of Toronto enter into a Limiting Distance Agreement that is required for the construction of a residential condominium building adjacent to TRCA-owned lands. To allow a substantial amount of glass on the side of the proposed building, the City of Toronto requires that the abutting landowner agree not to construct a building within a certain distance of the property line. Limiting Distance Agreements are executed by the owners of the property requiring the agreement, the owner of the land impacted by the proposed limiting distance area and by the City of Toronto as regulator under the Ontario Building Code. City of Toronto Legal and Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff have been consulted and are in agreement with the proposed Limiting Distance Agreement. The current zoning on the larger parcel of TRCA land is zoned Open Space and prohibits any form of buildings or structures with the exception of passive, recreational -type development such as pathways and trails. The subject lands are encumbered by a sub -surface easement related to an underground parking garage that serves the condominium building to the north, (Phantom Developments). There are additional easements that serve an emergency stairwell associated with parking garage on the east side of the parcel, the Limiting Distance Agreement lands partially encompass this structure. The subject property was acquired for the Revised Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park (March 1993). Attachment 1 is a sketch illustrating the location of the subject lands and the portion of the lands subject to the Limiting Distance Agreement. Attachment 2 is an orthophoto illustrating the location of the subject lands and the portion of the lands subject to the Limiting Distance Agreement. RATIONALE The entire parcel of land has been allocated for a park through an agreement with the City of Toronto, the condominium developer to the north (Phantom Developments), and TRCA rendering them sterilized for all intents and purposes. The City of Toronto is a partner agency and the Limiting Distance Agreement will not result in any detrimental impact on the subject TRCA land nor the current or intended use of the property. The building restrictions on the approximately 53 square meter strip of TRCA land will ensure that normal park operation, paths, trails, etc., are guaranteed without restriction. The agreement does not restrict City of Toronto or TRCA staff from exercising their normal planning review and commenting responsibilities. The agreement will be revoked or terminated upon receipt of written notice from the City of Toronto that the new construction has been removed or no longer exists. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategies set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 3 — Rethink greenspace to maximize its value Strategy 7 — Build partnerships and new business models FINANCIAL DETAILS Kingbird Developments Inc. has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by: Cheryl Waters, extension 5859 Emails: chervl.waters(&trca.ca For Information contact: Cheryl Waters, extension 5859 or Daniel Byskal, extension 6452 Emails: chervl.watersatrca.ca or danlei. bvskal(d-trca.ca Date: April 21, 2021 Attachments: 2 Attachment 1: Site Plan Attachment 2: Orthophoto Attachment 1: Site Plan Limited Distance Agreement mJ A <q qRk, ty 3 0 �2 �P oc I ® TorontoandRegion Conservation Authority YORK OU HAM T PEEL TORONTO xo onreno SITE Hnacnmem c. ur-mo nolo dKI T I Y `LiMI e Distance 4 } Agreement , F ® 61W, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 0 0 PEEL: r 6p or "I. OWm. RES.#B46/21 - CITY OF TORONTO Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto, for a conveyance of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority -owned lands located at 5 Shoreham Drive, in the City of Toronto, required for a daylight triangle at the corner of Shoreham Drive and Murray Ross Parkway, Humber River watershed (CFN 60170). Moved by: Xiao Han Seconded by: Jack Heath THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto, as a requirement of site plan approval, for the conveyance of TRCA-owned lands located at 5 Shoreham Drive, City of Toronto, required for a daylight triangle; AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with City of Toronto in this instance; THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a parcel of TRCA-owned land containing 5.6 square meters (0.0014 acres), more or less, of vacant land, required for a daylight triangle, designated as Part 1 on Registered Plan 66R-31319, in the City of Toronto, be conveyed to the City of Toronto; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00 and all legal, survey and other costs to be paid by TRCA; THAT the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry be advised of this disposition for municipal infrastructure purposes, in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction, including obtaining any necessary approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND On February 27, 2015 Res. #A23/15 approved 5 Shoreham Drive as the preferred site for the new TRCA administration building. The project is now under construction, and the City of Toronto's site plan approval requirements include the requirement for conveyance of the daylight triangle. On November 20, 2020 RES.#A193/20 received an update on the schedule and construction progress of the New Administrative Office Building. Attachment 1 is a sketch illustrating the location of the subject lands. Attachment 2 is an orthophoto illustrating the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE Daylight or sight triangles are part of the public right-of-way. They are located at road intersection quadrants and require clear visibility for safe vehicular movement between streets, driveways, or alleys. The conveyance of daylight triangles to municipalities is a standard requirement of site plan approval. The conveyance of the daylight triangle to the City of Toronto is necessary to fulfill the requirements of site plan approval. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategies set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 1 — Green the Toronto region's economy Strategy 10 — Accelerate innovation Strategy 11 — Invest in our staff FINANCIAL DETAILS The cost of the conveyance will be born by TRCA through internal resources as the conveyance will be completed in-house by TRCA's Legal Counsel and Law Clerk. Report prepared by: Lendita Konjuvca, extension 6449 Emails: lendita.koniuvca(aDtrca.ca For Information contact: Lendita Konjuvca, extension 6449 Emails: lendita.koniuvca(ab_trca.ca Date: April 30, 2021 Attachments: 2 Attachment 1: Site plan Attachment 2: Orthophoto Attachment 1: Site Plan ?'G �O NN O� o���P ♦_ Subject 5•j• '� Property \t i i Toronto and Region '�'-- -- v4ff Conservation YORK DURHAM Authority T PEEL \�Yryr\J SITE r TORONTO Dexo onreno RES.#B47/21 - TORONTO HYDRO Receipt of a request from Toronto Hydro, for a permanent easement required for New Administrative Office Building line connection, located at 5 Shoreham Drive, in the City of Toronto Moved by: Xiao Han Seconded by: Jack Heath THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from Toronto Hydro for a permanent easement required for New Administrative Office Building hydro line connection, located at 5 Shoreham Drive, in the City of Toronto; AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to cooperate with Toronto Hydro in this instance; THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing approximately, 0.025 hectares (0.062 acres), more or less, required for the hydro utility for the New Administrative Office Building, as shown on the Attachments to this report, be conveyed to Toronto Hydro; THAT consideration be $2 and that all legal, appraisal, survey and other costs to be paid by TRCA; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction, including obtaining any necessary approvals and the signing and execution of documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND On February 27, 2015 Res. #A23/15 approved 5 Shoreham Drive as the preferred site for the new TRCA administration building. The project is now under construction, and the construction requires provision for the installation of new utility services for the building. On November 20, 2020 RES.#A193/20 received an update on the schedule and construction progress of the New Administrative Office Building. Attachment 1 is a sketch illustrating the location of the subject lands. Attachment 2 is an orthophoto illustrating the location of the subject lands. RATIONALE As part of the construction process, TRCA was required to upgrade the power supply to the site, which requires new Toronto Hydro equipment be located on the site. The easement provides Toronto Hydro with a right of access to their equipment to ensure its long-term operation and maintenance. The conveyance of the easement to Toronto Hydro is necessary to secure the installation of the hydro utility to the building and will not interfere with TRCA's use of the site. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategies set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 10 — Accelerate innovation Strategy 11 — Invest in our staff Strategy 1 — Green the Toronto region's economy FINANCIAL DETAILS The cost of registering the easement will be born by TRCA through internal resources as the conveyance will be completed in-house by TRCA's Legal Counsel and Law Clerk. Report prepared by: Lendita Konjuvca, Law Clerk, extension 6449 Emails: lendita.koniuvca(aD_trca.ca For Information contact: Lendita Konjuvca, extension 6449 Emails: lendita.koniuvca(a).trca.ca Date: May 3, 2021 Attachments: 2 Attachment 1: Easement Area Site Plan Attachment 2: Orthophoto Easement Area Attachment 1:Site Plan 'p - Permanent Easement i &ack Cr �"---eAN ek Toronto and Region --- �� Conservation YORK OU HAM Authority T PEEL \�Yryr\J SITE r TORONTO Dexo onreno Section III — Items for the Information of the Board RES.#B48/21 - 2021 THREE MONTH FINANCIAL REPORT Receipt of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) unaudited expenditures as of the end of the first quarter, March 3111 2021, for informational purposes. Moved by: Linda Jackson Seconded by: Anthony Perruzza IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the 2021 Financial Report for the three-month period ending March 31, 2021 be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND As part of TRCA's financial governance procedures, staff are presenting the 2021 Three Month Financial Report, which covers the period from January 1, 2021 through to March 31, 2021. This report provides information on the spend rate of expenditures for the first three months of 2021. RATIONALE TRCA believes in transparency and accountability for its spending, revenue recognition and performance of service delivery objectives against approved budgets, for both the organization and for each project and program as an individual endeavour. This is further supported by TRCA's core values of integrity, collaboration, accountability, respect and excellence. TRCA recognizes that all projects and programs offered have cost implications and that all costs incurred are reasonable and practical in support of services. Transparency throughout the budget management process is achieved in part through the analysis and reporting on year to date revenues/expenses as compared to the current fiscal year budget. In order to improve the accuracy in reporting anticipated issues in expenditures, TRCA established a seasonal forecasting baseline using historical data from the past three years to estimate the seasonal variances within each program area. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategy set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 9 — Measure performance FINANCIAL DETAILS The capital and operating report by Service Area and underlying Program Areas are provided in Attachments 1 and 2 respectively. The attachments provide a summary analysis of expenditures to date and the variance explanations by Program Area which have a variance threshold of +/- 10% and $500,000 from anticipated quarterly spend rates. Variances within these thresholds are deemed to be within the expected range. The capital report contains three reportable variances for the three-month period, whereas the operating report contains zero reportable variances. Attachment 3 provides explanations for each reportable variance. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff are constantly analyzing TRCA's 2021 operations in the context of COVID-19's impact on the organization's revenues and expenditures and potential for government funding to reduce the negative repercussions of restrictions to our staff complement, while ensuring that the safety of staff and the public is maintained. Staff will continue to provide quarterly financial updates to the Board of Directors. More detailed information on COVID-19's year to date impacts can be found in the report titled 2021 COVID-19 Four Month Update. Report prepared by: Jenifer Moravek, extension 5659 Emails: jenifer.moravek(a�trca.ca For Information contact: Michael Tolensky, extension 5965 Emails: michael.tolensky(aDtrca.ca Date: April 16, 2021 Attachments: 3 Attachment 1 - Capital Budget Expenditures Attachment 2 - Operating Budget Expenditures Attachment 3 - Variance Explanations ATTACHMENT 1: CAPITAL BUDGET EXPENDITURES Watershed Planning and Reporting Climate Science Water Resource Science Erosion Management Flood Management Biodiversity Monitoring Ecosystem Management Research and Directions Forest Management Restoration and Regeneration Greenspace Securement Greenspace Management Waterfront Parks Conservation Parks Trails Black Creek Pioneer Village Events and Festivals Environmental Assessment Planning and Permitting Policy Development and Review School Programs Newcomer Services Family and Community Programs Living City Transition Program Community Engagement Financial Management Corporate Management and Governance Human Resources Corporate Communications Information Infrastructure and Management Project Recoveries Vehicles and Equipment Grand Total Q32021 Anticipated Q32021 Actual Q32021 Variance Expenditure Anticipated Anticipated Ql Actual Actual Spend Rate $Difference %Difference Reportable Expenditures Spend (%) Expenditures (%) Expenditures Spend Rate Variance __- 342,853 .............. __. .............. 23% ........ .............. 24],340 .............. .............. .............. 1]% ................. .. 95,513 ........ ..._. 6% ........ ...... ..... .............. .............. .............. ...109,653 .............. 21% .............. -.-.-. 93,644 .............. -.-.-. ................. 18%,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 16009 ................ ................. 3% 247224 9%,,,,,, 123,984 5% .,9,]063]4 _.........-----__... ,,,,,, 14% ..... ....,936515] ........ ....., .............. 14%....., .... 341,21],.,,,..., ........ ................. 0% ...... ................. .................. 822,523 19% -1,07 -------- 6,16925 % (253,646) -6% 6]4191 21% 4]924815% 194,943 ----6%- ------ .............. 24],253 .............. .............. .............. 22% .............. .............. 219,526 .............. .............. ................. 20% ................. 2],]2] ................ ................. 3% ........ ...... ..... .............. _ 480,602 32% 214313 1d% 26 6,090 ll% .............. .,1:8]00]9 .............. 12% .............. 1725673 .............. .............. 11% ... 144407 ................ ................. 1% .......182191 .............. 23% .............. 21,933 .............. 3%.............. 160,258............ 20% ...... ................. ]83,100 14% 209,690 4% 5]3,411 10% A ]21,14] 15% 201,365 4% 519 ,782 11% B .............. 62,585 .............. .............. .............. 20% .............. .............. 22,202 .............. .............. .............. 7% .............. .. 40,383 .. ................ ................. 13% ........ ...... ..... .............. .............. 2,311 18 .............. 18% .............. 1,128,018 .............. .............. 9% .............. 1,235,900 .............----------------- 9% . .........2,363,918 69,444 15% 423 64,-------------- 14% 5,021 1% .............. .............. 0% .............. .............. 0% .............. ............ 0% ............ .............. .............. .............. 0% .............. 48,643 .............. .............. ]% ............ (48,643) ............ -]% .............. 15]6]1 22% 101014 14% 56,65] 8% .,.,.,.,.. .......592523 ............. .............. 16% .,.,.......... ..............330810 __. .............. 9%............. _....... .__. .. 261714............ ................ ................. ]% _3]134 24% 32041 21% 5,096 3% ............................ 3,801 16% .............. .. . .............. .............. 4]% .. J- ........ ...... ................. -31% 1,286,190 23% 88 3,83 1 16% 402,359 ]% .............. 694,]6] .............. 16% .............. 394,463 .............. ................. 9% 300,304 ................ ................. 7% 0% 32,734 8% (32,734) -8% .............. 11,622012 ....... .............. ,,,,,, 29% .............. ....?951408 .............. ....., ................. ]%....., 86]0603,.,,,..., ................ ................. 21%.... C .............. 0% 151,915 0% 351,915) 0% .............. .............. 0% .............. ............................ 0% ... ......... ............. 0% .............. .......141964 ............. 23% .............. 5. 544 .............. 9% .............. 85,420............ 14% .............. - .............. 0% .............. 9],4 66 .............. ................. 81% (9],666) ................ ................. -81% 0% (2851]) 0% 28,51] 0% 33,342,986 I8% 20,379,640 11% 12,963,346 7% ATTACHMENT 2: OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURES Watershed Planning and Reporting Climate Science Water Resource Science Erosion Management Flood Management Biodiversity Monitoring Ecosystem Management Research and Directions Forest Management Restoration and Regeneration Greenspace Securement Greenspace Management Rental Properties Waterfront Parks Conservation Parks Trails Bathurst Glen Golf Course Black Creek Pioneer Village Events and Festivals Wedding and Corporate Events Development Planning and Regulation Permitting Environmental Assessment Planning and Permitting Policy Development and Review School Programs Newcomer Services Family and Community Programs Living City Transition Program Community Engagement Social Enterprise Development Financial Management Corporate Management and Governance Human Resources Corporate Communications Information Infrastructure and Management Project Recoveries Vehicles and Equipment Grand Total Q12021 Anticipated Q12021 Actual 412021 Variance Expenditure Anticipated Anticipated QI Actual Actual Spend Rate 6 Difference % Difference Reportable Expenditures Spend (%) Expenditures (%) Expenditures Spend Rate Variance .,.,.,.,. 118,380 .,.,.,.,. 27% ............. 131,013 .,.,.,.,. 30% .,.,.,..... ...,........... 112,633) .,.,....... -3% % ............ .............. .............. D% .............. .............. D% .............. ................. ................ D% 0%0% 0% .............. .............. 0% .............. 12,692 .............. 25% .............. (12,692) -25% .............. .. ................ .............. 229851 ...-.-.-.-.-... 22/ ...-.-.-.-.-.-.- 226037,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .............. 22% .............. 3814,.,.,,_,_,_,_ ................ .......... 0% --------- .............. .........3040 .............. ...........5..1.%. .............. ..........A..3. .............. .............. 2% .............. .......Z..8.6.7. .............. .. ........ .............. 48% -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. ___ ........ .............. ........ .............. 0% .............. .............. .............. .............. 0% .............. .............. .............. .. ................ 0% .............. .. ................ .............. 11,942 .............. .............. .............. 10% .............. .............. 14,846 .............. .............. 12% .............. .............. (2,905) ................ ................ -2% .............. .. ........ ............. 159,054 --- 37% 246,178 --- 57% --- (87,123) _ 20% __. .............. __. 0% .............. __. 359 .............. __. .............. 0% __. 1359) .............. _. 0% .............. .. ................ ________262,610 _.-.-._________ 44% _______ 242 506..___________ 60% --------------1-- .............._______ 3% __ 42],454 30% 174,814 12% 252,640 18% ........., ......... 0% ......... .. ....... .................. 0% .. ...... ... 0% ......... _________ __ -.---- 692,187 -.-.-.-.- I4% .-.-.-.- -------- 668,247 -.-.-.-_ ---...-. ................ 13% .............. ..........____ ....................... 23,941... ______ .___ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-_D%-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.... _______ 0% 0% 0% 141534 .............. 12% ..............98]26 .............. 8% .............. 42807 .............. 4% .............. 463,447 .............. 22% .............. 33],64] .............. 16% .............. 125,800 ................. ................ 6% .............. ....., 46 ]]8 .............. .............. 39% .............. .............. 6,m .............. .............. 5% .............. .............. 46,551 .............. .. ........ .............. 34% ....... ................ .............. .............. .............. 0% .............. .............. .............. .............. 0% .............. .............. .............. .......... 0% .............. .. ................ __... .............. 1,82185] ............. .............. ,,,,,, 25% .............. ...1:45636] .............. ....., 20% .............. ....., 365490 ................. ................ ....., 5% .. ........ ............. 1,143,135 24% 991249 21% 151,886 3% 167,25529% 29% ........... 122,138 .............. 21% .............. 45,117 .............. 8% M,829.... 24"% -------- -------------- 1"8"% _______-I---- 56 6% 262,277 - 26% 205,406 21% _________-56,8]2 --___ 6% ......... , 19]412 .................... 22% I. .15308] .......:. 17% ........ ......... 44325 ... ................................ 5% 21% 5,933 832] 21% 993 3% ]334 19% .............. .............. 0% .............. .............. 0% .............. 0% .............. .. ........ ............. .............. 877,157 .............. 26-% .............. ]38,277 .............. 22% .............. 138,880 ................. ................ 4% 1.,206,W1 20% 420513 ]% ....,.,.,. 459388 .......... ..... 25% .00 __. ..... 15% _. ..... 1]5 288 ... ..... 30%...... 27% .198 ..... 20% .—... 108714 ..... 6% 28% ]3,900 68 25% 88298 3%(489,]45) 12% 19) 15% 101,5]4-3% 14,369) ..... 3%556 .5S .... 81% (130,925)I11,6114,EA9 25% 779 20% 2,167,830 S% ATTACHMENT 3: VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS CAPTIAL REPORTABLE VARIANCE NOTES - EXPENDITURES (Figures in 000's) A The lower than anticipated expenditures are related to the Albion Hills Conservation Area office and workshop replacement, which has been deferred to Q4 2021 as a result of delays in planning and design. Once this is taken into consideration, the variance is $162 and 3% which is within the acceptable threshold. B The lower than anticipated expenditures are due to the delay in implementation of the Scarborough Waterfront Project. The detailed design of the Brimley Road South multi -use trail is underway and implementation is planned to begin in Q4 2021. The detailed design of the West Segment is also underway and is anticipated to be complete by Q4 2021. Additionally, a meeting has been scheduled with City of Toronto staff in early Q2 2021 to establish key City staff to support project implementation going forward. Once this is taken into consideration the variance is $5 and 0% which is within the acceptable threshold. C The lower than anticipated expenditures are related to the delivery and installation of mass timber at TRCA's new administrative office building, which has been delayed to Q2. Once this is taken into consideration the variance is $663 and 2% which is within the acceptable threshold. OPERATING REPORTABLE VARIANCE NOTES - EXPENDITURES IFieures in variance to report in RES.#B49/21 - Q1 2021 COMMUNICATIONS SUMMARY Information report regarding Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) corporate media communication activities during the first quarter of 2021 (January — March). Moved by: Linda Jackson Seconded by: Anthony Perruzza IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the Q1 2021 Communications Summary report be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Communications, Marketing and Events business unit, with involvement of program areas across TRCA's Divisions, carries out corporate communications programs to provide TRCA with a unified voice that aligns consistently with strategic priorities, and monitors results to identify opportunities for improvements. Working with staff from all divisions and external program and service providers, the business unit delivers communications campaigns through traditional media outlets and online social media channels. Content is typically disseminated through materials such as news releases and media advisories, direct outreach to targeted journalists, producers and editors, and responses to incoming media inquiries. Digital campaigns involve posting of visual and written content on websites and distribution via social media platforms. All media activity is supported by ongoing assessment and deployment of technology tools and processes to maximize effectiveness. In first quarter (Q1) of 2021, the majority of the traditional media stories focused on the Province's Minister's Zoning Order (MZO) for Duffins Creek wetlands. The Provincial government's Ontario Regulation 159/21, compelling TRCA to provide permission for a future development on the ecologically sensitive wetland and property was discussed in detail in major news outlets, including Toronto Star, Globe and Mail, CBC and others. The social media activity in Q1 also reflected the attention this issue received by TRCA followers and audiences. Specifically, in March 2021, TRCA's social media accounts saw an increase of 24% in engagement as hundreds of messages were received about the Province's MZO of Duffins Creek wetlands. Overall, in the first quarter, TRCA grew its audience by 31 % with total impressions peaking at close to two million. Both the traditional media and social media traction received in Q1 is an indication that our audiences are engaged and listening to TRCA's point of view and TRCA is putting out communications that provide insight and interest to its audiences. While TRCA produces communications materials for multiple programs and projects managed by business units across the organization, this report provided in Attachment 1 focuses on notable media coverage and the social media activity during the reporting period. Relationship to Building the Living City, the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan This report supports the following strategy set forth in the TRCA 2013-2022 Strategic Plan: Strategy 6 — Tell the story of the Toronto region DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA is preparing a Communications Plan to ensure more streamlined and strategically focused media relations that will guide our approach in working with media. TRCA is creating media relations / briefing documents and holding education sessions with staff to better prepare staff to speak to media in a consistent manner with accurate messaging. TRCA continues to engage / target media outlets on stories that are unique to the organization and its mandate. Report prepared by: Sinem Connor, extension 5401, Clare Graham, extension 6456 Emails: sinem.connorCciltrca.ca; clare.graham(cDtrca.ca For Information contact: Michael Tolensky, extension 5965 Emails: michael.tolenskvC&trca.ca Date: May 6, 2021 Attachments: 1 Attachment 1: Notable TRCA Media Coverage & Social Media Activity: January — March 2021 Attachment 1 Report Overview This report covers communications and marketing activities between January 1, 2021 — March 31, 2021. Q1 Successes 1. Communications published the 2020 annual report and Conservation Matters video that showcases our value and role in the region to our stakeholders. 2. Improved events calendar on the TRCA website to include all TRCA led events. Q1 Social Activity The social media activity in Q1 reflected the attention the Duffins Creek issue received in the media by Specifically in March 2021, Key Metrics: - Audiences grew across TRCA social channels by 31% - Total Impressions of social content peaked at close to two million - Social media accounts saw an increase of 24% in engagement as hundreds of messages were received about the Province's MZO of Duffins Creek wetlands - TRCA Trended on Twitter during the Duffins Creek Hearing Best Performing Social Media Posts: Facebook Toronto and Region Conservation Authority March 5 Q To review TRCA's response to the Province's unheralded regulation legally requiring TRCA to grant permission for development at 1802 Bayly Street by March 12, 2021, please read our press release on the matter: https://bit.ly/3rnxGZR 00 37 16 Comments 51 Shares Twitter E Tweet �� TRCA HQ ... 0W @TRCA_HQ To review TRCA's response to the Province's unheralded regulation legally requiring TRCA to grant permission for development at 1802 Bayly Street by March 12, 2021, please read our press release on the matter: bit.ly/3rnxGZR Linkedin �� T_�M1raamt�Flc«�aer,et;aa,wuv�rytmw ... Phase mreaf YM1e Pett -- :,�^�.egxE a,m'pletY This is aad _ _ __ �. t xrm.=_.rro emversmfnnmwarccrt m -_. _ :s aeo S loa square meves ar rgana� M1abrtae evayn /.:_ra ware cae e._ .^_o pF3nenga araneaam�xaawrx� xrn,�rx�ar,a�neo, 4:56 PM Mar 5, 2021 Sprout Soul 86 Retweets 23 Quate Tweets 134 Likes Q1 Media Coverage: 000 7 .a , In Q1, the majority of the traditional media stories focused on the Province's MZO of Duffins Creek wetlands. The Provincial government's Ontario Regulation 159/21, requiring TRCA to provide permission for a future development on the ecologically sensitive wetland and property was discussed in detail in major news outlets, including Toronto Star, Globe and Mail, CBC and others. Other main media topics included: - Filming at Tommy Thompson - News regarding safety of waterways - Hwy 413 �� �:-i a par!rvecfly, P�^le«-tr :._ Fe�an Canserwtnn P.utM1arn lThCRY-ardl�l =.•.. -,.e _ _ - _._ -:_.. ^-la ma. �zweonaf - ate q. I -. : _ :. _ aE•:at zMe-Jrar�.z _. -_ rcnmeaettimat oee: _.__. aad _ _ __ �. t xrm.=_.rro emversmfnnmwarccrt m -_. _ :s aeo S loa square meves ar rgana� M1abrtae evayn /.:_ra ware cae e._ .^_o pF3nenga araneaam�xaawrx� xrn,�rx�ar,a�neo, 4:56 PM Mar 5, 2021 Sprout Soul 86 Retweets 23 Quate Tweets 134 Likes Q1 Media Coverage: 000 7 .a , In Q1, the majority of the traditional media stories focused on the Province's MZO of Duffins Creek wetlands. The Provincial government's Ontario Regulation 159/21, requiring TRCA to provide permission for a future development on the ecologically sensitive wetland and property was discussed in detail in major news outlets, including Toronto Star, Globe and Mail, CBC and others. Other main media topics included: - Filming at Tommy Thompson - News regarding safety of waterways - Hwy 413 DUFFINS CREEK WETLAND IN PICKERING - MZO Daily Commercial News by ConstructConnect^ January 28, 2021 Full Article: Green leader, Clark spar on Minister's Zoning Orders at ROMA conference - constructconnect.com Green leader, Clark spar on Minister's Zoning Orders at ROMA conference ban Wall January 2H,2021 SCRttNSH01—Ministero£Mun111p1 Affairs and Horsing Steve Clarkadd.sed dek lh, attending the virtual Rurd Ontario Municipal Association mr lfecri elan 26. 0 ntaria Green party Leader Mike Schreiner delivered a blistering attack on the province's "reckless" development policies and stewardship of the environment during day two of the virtual Rural Ontanis Municipal Association (ROMA) conference Jan. 26, especially targeting changes to the role of conservation authorities. 'Let there be no doubt that we will build back from COVIO-19,' said Schreiner, speaking an hour before Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Steve Clark was to address the conference. 'The question is how. The premier has shown that he wants to build back recklessly by dismantling environmental protections put in place aver the last 75 years" February 4, 2021 Full article: 'Poster child for destruction': The fight to save the Duffins Creek wetland from developers I NO.ore Enviro rmerf `Poster child for destruction': The fight to save the Duffin Creek wetland from developers A billionaire and a b us! ness4riendly government have set their sights on a provincially significant wetland in Pickering. These advocates are trying to save it —and stop it from becoming a warehouse %Marsha Mcl.. tl- Published ou Feb 04, 202] J) PICKERINC — Several months ago, Devin Mathura and Ally Zaheer learned that a large swath of Owetland in their hometown of Pickering was set to be turned Into a massive warehouse. Stuck in y their respective bedrooms amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the university students started Ointerviewing experts and local politicians about the proposed development. ✓ "What is most at stake is the future of our green spaces," says Zaheer. "I am extremely worried about the fact thatthey€e just going to get into this cycle of paving over things, and its going to be too late before they realize what's done." The friends reached cut to students at their former high school to share what they'd learned about the Duffin Creek wetland complex, which has long been designated provincially significant, indicating its special ecological value. They set up a Zoom session with other students and explained that the development had been approved through a Minister's Zoning Order — a provincial edict that allows the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to make decisions on land zoning while bypassing normal planning processes, such as the citizens' rights to appeal. Then they coordinated a "phone zap." CANADAS* NATIONAL OBSERVER March 4, 2021 Full article: Ford government expanding MZO powers to dodge lawsuit and pave over wetland: internal document I National Observer CANADAs+ NATIONAL OBSERVER v C ANOUT NEWS OPINION cONVER5G1 ANALYSTS FEATURES SPECIAL REPORTS CANdOA NOW POOCA9T q Ford government expanding MZO powers to dodge lawsuit and pave over wetland: internal document Br= _ ...'I 1 r,cel MarCh4th2._r YS of 9 article=_ from the Special Nepal: iuriw9 gut �9 Fvrdsspecul WNusa ordere 4turhamRegion.com March 5, 2021 Full Article: TRCA has until March 12 to issue permit to build on Pickering wetlands (durhamregion.com) 5 cm TRCA has until March 12 to issue permit to build on Pickering wetlands Critics are opposing a developers plan to build on Duffins Creek wetland complex By Kristen Calisw Pic<ering News Advertiser friday, March 5, 2021 In an "unprecedented" move, the provincial government passed a special regulation that gives the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA' a hard deadline to issue a permit for development on a wetland in Pickering. The TRCA has until March 12 to issue a permit that critics say will destroy migratory bird habitat on the Duffins Creek wetland complex. I THE STAR [ March 5, 2021 Full article: 'Under duress,' Toronto's conservation authority fights back against push to level environmentally sensitive Pickering wetlands I The Star im `Under duress,' Toronto's conservation authority fights back against push to level environmentally sensitive Pickering wetlands IDBN onr lavetl i[aff 0epnrier Fri.,Wamh 5,2031 04am: read 6 Lrfid..as ,d.MdMar_ 07,2021 f lromntos conservation authorityispilshingbackagairsst the Doug Ford aolnm�siMe,rt government, wong the public to get imolxxd after the prminceordered it to issue a permit allowing a developer to level and fill with soil a provincially siprificant wetland in Pickering � � a "DURHAM UWWRADIONEWS.COM March 7, 2021 Full Article: MPPs, conservation authority calling against development of Duffin's Creek wetlands I Durham Radio News IVIPPs, conservation authority calling against development of Duffin's Creek wetlands March 7. 2021 1 2.12 prn Queen's Park continues to come under fire from activists and conservation officials over their development plans for the Duffles Creek wetlands. Part of the 'Durham Live' project is set to be built on the wetlands. While touted by leaders in Pickering as a way to attract thousands of jobs to the area, its impact on local ecosystems has been questioned by Ajax council and environmental groups. On Saturday, a protest in Pickering was attended by Oshawa MPP Jennifer French and Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner. Both have spoken against the project. €ter• March 8, 2021 Full Article: Environmental groups apply for court order to prevent construction on Pickering wetlands I CBC News Environmental groups apply for court order to prevent construction on Pickering wetlands f y► w rill in Conservation authority says it provided construction permit under duress CBC News - Posted Mar 08, 2621 2x44 PM ET I Last Updated March 8 A view of the section of Pickeri ng wetland that would be the site of a distribution and production facill (Google Maps) 14 comments €nvironmentaI groups opposing a development project on protected wetlands in Pickering have filed a court motion in an effort to preventtha start of construction. The Ford government issued a regulation on March 4 requiring ite Toronto Region and Conservation Authority (TRCA) to give permission to Pickering Developments Inc. to begin development of a distribution and production facility on wetlands surrounding Lower Duffons Creek by March 12. CANADA'S,b NATIONAL OBSERVER March 8, 2021 Full Article: Durham Live developer donated to PCs days before bill cleared the way for project on protected wetland I National Observer Durham Live developer donated to PCs days before bill cleared the way for project on protected wetland By c- ..�,_o111':ruc, P, arcs I March 8V 1021 i] of 9 enid.s from the Syenlsl Rs,.R Toning wt Doug FoN's special IaMwce orders The developers behind the controversial Durham Live project donated thousands to the Progressive Conservatives days before the government cleared the way for the project. A warehouse connected to Durham Live, a casino complex proposed by developer Iriple Group, is stated to be built on top of a protected cluster of marshes and esv� rnn nnr ,,d to fha N,fhnc rraak watarchni in Pirkarinu flnt Thmmh I THE STAR [ March 9, 2021 Full article: Doug Ford says he's 'proud' of controversial MZOs to fast-track development I The Star Doug Ford says he's `proud' of controversial MZOs to fast-track development By Aubert Benzie Queen's Park Bureeu Uief Tue.,March9,2021 oLmn.read 0 6rtiderrasupdaMd Maa11,2621 An unrepentantPremier Doug Ford insists MEOs areA-OK. After his government mnunedthmugh another six ministerial mningcrders (MZO) to fast-track local dee-Aopment, Ford said he's `proud to announce that wm harm MZ'Ds,because it's about the economy" "Once ms get through this (pandemic). people are going to he looking forjohs," the premier said Tuesday, stressing the fast-growing Greater Toronto Area's housing crunch alae must he tackled_ "Ft's no longerjustthatyonngpeopleean't afford housing it's ev ryone_We wmrtmrnm hrnlces Dort there, rnore mndnnileliums.11alm twnllmusesto make 0.WfWTISLMM *CBC March 10, 2021 Full Article: What's really behind the Ford government's push to pave protected wetland in Pickering I CBC News What's really behind the Ford government's push to pave protected wetland in Pickering v w s in Rival developers competing to host Canada's biggest retail warehouse, which sources say is for Amazon LMikeCrawleyCBC News - Posted: Mar 10, 2421 400 AM ET I Last Updated: March 10 Roughly haft efthis property in Pickering, owned by Triple Group, is classed as a protected wetland. If approved for development, commercial real estate analysts say itwould skyrocket in value, pAerstially to more than 5160 million_ This view looks narthwest from the corner of Bayly Street and Squires Beach Read_ fPatdck MomeNCBC7 768 comments i Moves by Premier Doug Ford's government to grant special permission to pave over a protected wetland in Pickering have generated headlines, but behind the controversy, there's an untold story. That story involves a battle between rival developers and rival municipalities to get the chance to build what would become the largest retail warehouse in Canada, a project worth hundreds of millions of dollars that multiple sources say is for Amazon. •rhamRegion.com Full Article: Ford defends use of land development tool (durhamregion.com) March 10, 2021 Ford defends use of land development tool The Canadian Press Wednesday, March 10. 2021 fy►® TORONTO — Ontario Premier Doug Ford defended his government's use of a cortrowersiai land planning tool on Wednesday amid mounting concerns it was being used to green -light developments without proper environmental consultations. The mechanism known as a ministerial zoning order gives the municipal affairs minister power to fast-track development in a given area. Opposition parties have criticized the Progressive Conservative government for issuing dozens of the orders over the last year, and several in the last week, compared with infrequent use under previous governments. March 10, 2021 Full Article: Ontario premier defends use of development tool as concern mounts over fast -tracked projects (iheartradio.ca) SNOWS AUDIO VIDEO NEWSLETTERS SHOP THE GTA EXTRAS ONTARIO PREMIER DEFENDS USE OF DEVELOPMENT TOOL AS CONCERN MOUNTS OVER FAST -TRACKED PROJECT �w The CaradianPress weCse�ay; IAarM 10M1 21121-A4f pm G amario Premier Ooug Fwd defended his gave rrri use of a corrowereial land planning tool on Wednesday amid nountnrg aonoarre n was being used to gre r ightdevelopmems wdwa proper enwmnrrazmaf oarwuhatiom. Themeahanism known es a ministerial coning order gives the munlaipal affairs minister pawerta fast - seek development in a given area. (lppoairimn parties have criticized the Pragn ire Conservative government for issuing dazens of the orders over the last year. and sereral in the last week, compared with Infreguem use under previous governments. Ford argued in the legislature Wednesday that his government is using the orders to help create more jobs and affordable houeirg after the pandamia. What should 1 do when we get through the recovery? Say no, leis go through the prooess that will take four yeare and�one art in the... urremploymmt line.' Ford said March 11, 2021 Full Article: Ford government steamrolling opposition to Pickering wetland development, protesters say I CBC News Ford government steamrolling opposition to Pickering wetland development, protesters say Province pushing plan through despite apposition from community, environmentalists ASabrinajonas CBCNews Posted Mar 11,20ZI 11 05P FTI Last Updated March 11 Pickering residents and environmentalists protested on Thursday againstme controversial development on provincially protected Lower Duffns Creek wet€and-.ICBQ 27comments Protesters voicing their opposition to a proposed development project that would destroy the Lower Duffing Creek wetland in Pickering gathered Thursday outside the off ces of the corri that owns the land Thedemonstrators denounced a ministerial zoning order(MZ0) issued by the Ford government last fall that would allow the Triple Group of Companies to build Canada's largest distribution centre on the wetland, located south of Highway 401 near Pickering's borderwith Ajax. .IP CBC March 12, 2021 Full Article: Ford government's order to allow destruction of wetland poised to kick in Friday I CBC News Ford government's order to allow destruction of wetland poised to kick in Friday X, a in Toronto Region Conservation Authoritywill Issue permit to begin construction of warehouse'under duress' IL Mike Crawley CBC News Posted: Mar 1Z 2021 4:d6 AM ET I Last Updated. March 12 The Triple Group of companies is p roposing to build the largest retail warehouse in Canada on thi s Pickering pmpeny, roughly hal otwhich is cl assed as a prorrincially signnccant wetland. This view looks toward the southeast, with Squires Beach Road and Bayly Street in the background forming the boundary of the site. {Patrick Morrel I/C130 232 comments t=/ A developer is poised to get permission Friday to start destroying a protected wetland in Pickering in preparation for building a giant retail warehouse on the site. The Ford government ordered the Toronto Region Conservation Authority (fRCA) to issue a permit by Friday to allow the Triple Croup of Companies to move ahead with the proposed warehouse project on the Lower puffins Creek wetland, just south of Highway 401 _ March 12, 2021 Full article: Ontario cabinet minister faces storm over use of planning powers - The Globe and Mail Ontario cabinet minister faces storm over use of planning powers JEFF CRAY 1OOEENSPARK SEPQP?ER PUBLISHED. AR CH 12, 202L 99 COMMENTS h SHARE _ 1 A+ TEAT SIZE q BOOKMARK �l O00 DO Vd.. u Ontario +.I rFter nl Etunid of Aff wT.nd Mousln]. I u, i L a J. CHRISTOPBE£ KATSAAOV, THE CAAADIAN PRESS It might seem like a humdrum post that ntlxtPg involves stickhandling the various gripes ofsmaII-tonin mayors, But Ontario's current %linisha of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Steve Clark, has become one of the most prominent tlgures In Premier ooug Ford's cabinet, pardp through his use of prp'viLTusly obscure ptn�trs to approve development projects across the province while overriding planning and environmenul rules, TRENDING OPINION Three new thrillers an Nerflix, all uncanny and min&h.,mg 4. rOHN DOYLE 2 China responds angrily to Canada's L sancnnns mer human -rights abuses in Maiiang a- 3 George Weston to sell Historic bakery husinchs;. management shift sees Calm G_ W eSton return as U bla W president 4- 4 Telemedicine startup Dfalpne Health set to price TSX W atter landing more than 54billitnn In orders For its stock 0- Whycentrat hanks can'tsuppnn an economy in dictre, and cool ovn'heatinghousingmarkets cp- PREDATORS USE KID -FRIENDLY APPS TO MEET AND EXPLOIT CHILDREN. •rhamRegion.com March 12, 2021 Full Article: 'We lost this once in a lifetime opportunity:' Amazon no longer interested in building warehouse in Pickering (durhamregion.com) w SAVE ■ H'E Y Say No to MZO', , 4 starlTh 'We lost this once in a lifetime opportunity:' Amazon no longer interested in building warehouse in Pickering The news of Amazon pulling out came on same day of hearing on permit to build on wetlands 9y Kristen Cailso Pickering News Advertiser Friday; March 12, 2©21 Pickering Mayor Dave Ryan expressed his disappointment that Amazon is no longer considering building a warehouse in Pickering, and called for a pause on disrupting the wetlands. MiJIDURHAM H"RADIONEWS.COM March 13, 2021 Full Article: Pickering mayor calls for pause on wetland development after Amazon deal falls through Durham Radio News Pickering mayor calls for pause on wetland development after Amazon deal falls through March 13. 2021 110:27 am A Pickering wetland appears to be safe for now. Following reports that delivery giant Amazon has decided against building its next warehouse on the controversial plot of land, Mayor Dave Ryan has indicated that any immediate development should be held off. The land overlaps with a wetland deemed 'provincially significant' by Ontario's Ministry of Natural Resources and Fishery. This particular Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) takes up 18 hectares of the property, and is part of the Lower Dufrns Creek wetland complex. According to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TROA, it is used by amphibians, small mammals and breeding birds. The authority also blogTO March 14, 2021 Full article: Amazon decides not to build controversial warehouse on protected Pickering wetlands (blogto.com) yip...,...... ...,..,.: ,,...._, �..,...: a p uy,,....L.,_, Amazon decides not to build 4 controversial warehouse on 0 protected Pickering wetlands 0 dvn.�u-..: �a.eewdW.�mvm9 In tlwaeu�, fSLd lud rovnLLyuulet YI IHP NLallfe 0.�iuhantxtvaLMn M1vLlull)' l9 g141Ld I)uli�lY4' (I21111i1 ILL LfE liLl d2SIS 1e LLe kill Wdl l'ic' llW in yuC-Live,tws fEl uwl NLu4 C LL HILetlilil ut Llsz gwe:L�f Geeulell_ 4Pge vM fo[elfx tiLWJowlmlt, it dPDealTVlsaCa nitftM1P naetwux 43 �!0 J_ ia tJu[N[uvum laJ PVtmed[u�:wuuvc[�v Vr+k'=LeJwe[Ianilstrvu TmwtJ IAEp1 aryn�rq[o lapyec�afm.,fl_ fkit 6 Free Ml [an Wrtl R V^Qaw F1�� TheGe ela f Gn[a W t>tmlf r F ei 4 �rtniwas ry L ita QxS - t1 tly ayV.uviti5 uvvw eea6a of ^^.it¢PdliLllS maf wiotwuLuwmdue ry LL Lgh[tieu uE bl.a Letw LeJuEottlasiacrr%I. r�. q���y,��-��j .� !4� roewlRtN'miuswLavkf'4astie vf'Hl La las[-LLaa: aexe lrL9wsxxYww L1� u-ua: vela' ItiauMtl'ulsuler,vYwlws, Lbe pLWvweuFu['ero a Stay In the C1MLtiuflkluuYUeut$en[h[[�eaauvliCi4�LL[Y LWLV wla[all.. dvn.�u-..: �a.eewdW.�mvm9 In tlwaeu�, fSLd lud rovnLLyuulet YI IHP NLallfe 0.�iuhantxtvaLMn M1vLlull)' l9 g141Ld I)uli�lY4' (I21111i1 ILL LfE liLl d2SIS 1e LLe kill Wdl l'ic' llW in yuC-Live,tws fEl uwl NLu4 C LL HILetlilil ut Llsz gwe:L�f Geeulell_ .Ir CBC March 14, 2021 Full Article: Property developer vows to protect Pickering wetland after Amazon cancels warehouse plans I CBC News Property developer vows to protect Pickering wetland after Amazon cancels warehouse plans v m iiiii in Pickering Developments Inc. announced'voluntary promise' not to Interfere with wetland CBL News - Posted_ Mar 14, 2021 5 19 PM ET I Last Updated- March 14 In a statement, Pickering Developments Inc. announeed'through a legally enforceable undertaking, not to interfere with, alter or remw,-e the provincially significant wetland on its Pickering property." (Mike Craw1eylCBC1 70 comments Y The land owner and property developer that planned to put an Amazon warehouse on a provincially significant wetland in Pickering has announced a "voluntary promise" not to alter or remove the wetland Ina statement provided to CBC Toronto on Sunday, Pickering Developments Inc. announced "through a legally enforceable undertaking, not to interfere with, alter or remove the provincially significant wetland on its Pickering property." •rhamRegion.com March 15, 2021 Full Article: Significant wetland in Pickering saved from impending development (durhamregion.com) Cm Significant wetland in Pickering saved from impending development Developer agrees to not interfere with significant wetland on its property ny Kristen Caiis® Pickering News. Advertiser Monday. March 15. 2021 f 7/ Days after news that Amazon is no longer interested in building a warehouse on sensitive land in Pickering, the developer has pledged to leave the significant wetland alone. On Sunday, March 14, Pickering Developments (Squires) Inc. announced "a voluntary promise, through a legally enforceable undertaking, not to interfere with, alter or remove the provincially significant wetland on its Pickering property." Full Article: The rise and fall of the Duffins Creek MZO I TVO.org Enwroamenr The rise and fall of the Duffins Creek MZO Less than a year ago, Pickering city council voted to request the zoning edict. This week, It voted in favour of asking the government to rescind part of R. So what changed? By Marsha McLeod -Published m Mar 23, 2021 March 23, 2021 OIn a battle between wetland and warehouse, the wetland has won. On Monday evening, Pickering city council voted unanimously to request that the Ontario O government rescind part of a zoning edict that would have allowed the building of a warehouse of up to 4 million square feet on a large parcel of Duffins Creek wetland. It was a significant about- face for a council that had unanimously voted to request the zoning edict, with expedited consideration, less than a year ago. The decision came after a month of mounting pressure from residents, opposition lawmakers, environmental organizations, and the nearby Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation — all of whom were critical of the current government's use of minister's zoning orders to bypass local zoning processes. In mid-March, Amazon, the company set to build and use the warehouse, signaled that the Increasingly controversial ste, was no longer under consideration. NO.org examines how the high-profile development, which was championed by the Ontario governmentand by Pickering city council as a major economic driver for Durham, fell apart ever the last month. PARTNERSHIPS •IrkRegion.com January 17, 2021 Full article: Richmond Hill plants nearly 10,000 trees in joint effort with community in 2020 (yorkregion.com) COMMUNnN Richmond Hill plants nearly 10,000 trees in joint effort with community in 2020 5 hectares of land in parks and natural area have been restored By Sheila Wang® Richmond Hill Liberal Sunday. January 17, 2021 f y � Richmond Hill came out of a tumultuous year a greener city. The city planted 8,800 trees and shrubs partnering with local schools, businesses and community groups in 2020 though its community stewardship program, according to a release on Jan. 12. MASS TRANSIT March 22, 2021 Full article: Metrolinx renews agreement with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority I Mass Transit (masstransitmag.com) HOME I WANAEEMENT Metrolinx renews agreement with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority The agreement will help with the needed expansion and updating of ,public transit projects. From—Metrofi nx Mar22nd.2@1 ®© In ©® rRu.nlp help deliver vudal athiN-partN'review tm RIdY4 sure dra uauirthe regimn needs is buillin a sunainahke wry nn�our.. Metr all nx has renewed its agreement betweenthe'f'oranto and [legion Conservation Authoty ('I'RC,A� to help manage the upcoming portfolio of construction work that includes subways. rapid transit, new stations and Ci0 expansion. With the amount of transit expansiPn innastructore Metrolinx will be budding over the coming; years. tending to the natural environment is crucial to working across a vast landscape. "Che new and improved transit systems wiil connect municlgmlitieR and communities across the region, but new infrastructure and new services also require space and easy access for customers and maintenance crews. Pr h planning for Recovery - ncz:nay.are.:Eq ti New Orleans RTA Brings m Operations In -House to Focus on Service Delivery and Equity New Crtearz negimna. traa_i_ e.. _ Snc�hN IRT41 '_�' i nana;ema.c loinnic ev announces watinued partnership with New Jersey Transit -r tsc ee N.,h u.raii..a STAR emcuLianit ector nrw deputy exewnve director .tu .rz..s. _. _At_ The Scheduling Conundrum; .,.r. CBC March 8, 2021 Full Article: Residents glad Metrolinx to work with community on plans that will affect Small's Creek Ravine I CBC News Residents glad Metrolinx to work with conununity on plans that will affect Small's Creek Ravine IF 0 0 s in Metrolina says residents to be included in working group focused on future of path in ravine Muriel Draaisma - C61 News Posted: Mar OR, 2021 4:00 AM ET I Last tlpdail March 8 Residentswho live in the area of Danforth and Woodbine avenueswill be invited to]oin a working group set up by Metrolinx, the provincial transit agency, before work on GO expansion project gets urberway in their area. {Keith SurgesslC86 Some residents in Toronto's east end say Metrolinx Is finally consulting them about the impact of a GO expansion project that will affect a green space near their homes known as Small's Creek Rayne_ The residents, who live in the area of Danforth and Woodbine avenues, will be invited tojdin a working group set up by Metro I, rx, the provhrcial transit agency, before the project gets underway in their area. That working group will focus on the future of a path that provides a loop of the ravine_ Metrolinx plans to widen a railway embankment o supporta four -track, elec[rified Lakeshore East line. Trees will be removed from Small's Creek Ravine to enable crews to build a retaining wall and a new culvert as part of the project. The ravine, much loved by neighbourhood families, is tucked behind Copeland Avenue. between Coxwell and Woodbine Avenues, south of the The Architect's Newspaper Full article: March 9, 2021 Renderings revealed for West 8 and DTAH's spiffy Toronto waterfront revitalization (archpaper.com) Renderings revealed for West 8 and DTAH's spiffyToronto waterfront revitalization TMb]. agrnrr[M1azsicwaedr To[onmlrretcrf[mt has mWd l t,t 6 yy sntllo[af ft. 6 mto mmsslie[e€o[ml[yindusniaf SM1 Irnrinto Hhing Is tough, a local tlestination. ® aw wr+a W when h open; d:e gu.,"p mla of slipwiU haxsgtm,, oppomnidtsgalon. ttesidrntsend,mm ,11 he abk to mmo limber dtcked podtmmpkt, l.rozh kmandtanoes, and dine axa flwtingrestnomnt. Fmthost,vholike tatoke inti ,i,, these «ti 11 he an amPhlttieaterma mSoo. �Grtat..atrthons srommthe„mld he,x dininetdefitingfraxurcs,- said.chrt Gni ,,thiefptanningand design offittr forwate m Totmnm,in ayrcss rckasc.-utmmabk design, xItoming P blk swtt She abdin, to sena muntional aA nanswnatmn needs, „merrtom dinmgand rt+ssl.uptitn,, and cu llartoar i. mb[k "ffi8 tw mrh along&c brt,Yt[t[hca ath, T.. shorelmr dMcabadta 9lla6_ WdivioraQp,ia 29ii1hc [ity-aM waterhontTaeonmarlrttcd44T5 6`s teem propuasE to rcansl[ [M nuct4[d 7aeH LavNnFerty Rnmmsl end adpernt Fiathour Squatc Part.. Th[.am[riortt psrecl Msl x'illxnr u N[ [ti[n[c home o€ihr Patire[nrnisiip pmirtt,xssnn[re peri Mstidrnalk tats' msaire—aM nmr-shanrt,m,d—Qus,sid[ rcde,r]apmrnt scheme. .tnwc.`<aaaon SAFETY MESSAGING THE GATE ENTERTAINMENT MAGAZINE Full article: TRCA reminds visitors this winter: stay off the ice I The GATE January 18, 2021 TR-kVEL TRCA reminds visitors this winter: stay off the ice written by SV. Andrew Powell i january 18, 2621 This winter in Ontario we're facing numerous COVID precautions, and at the same time the Toronto and Region Conseivation Authority (MCA) wants to make everyone aware that it's not safe to go out on any lakes or other bodies of water this season. Because of the weather, and the fact that conditions have not been cold. enough to maintain ice thickness, the TRCA iswarning visitors not to go out on ice. toronto.com March 10, 2021 Full Article: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority warns of high water levels in rivers and streams I Toronto.com Toronto and Region Conservation Authority warns of high water levels in rivers and streams 'All shorelines, rivers, and streams within the GTA should be considered hazardous,' says TRCA NEWS WAIT 1 O. 20231 Bk'"NNALAME TORONia.CcL ©©CI®© High water levels ware ahsarved at 9rnotdh of the Lion River in this 2014'hle photo_ - Joanna Lau a+Twstar Tor a- : -=gion Conservation r _ - e : u : c about high water levels in rivers and streams, rh - ..,zeatedargerous sdustic-; - . =_-=sting a •e . , : _ _ a'Nater Safety watershed Conditions Statement at a, ' Ai:'S. It will be _. __._- ivlarch'12. Water Safety Watershed Conditions Si a: en's are issued when there are high flows, unsafebanks, melting ice or other factors that could he dangerous for recreational users like anglers, canoeists,hers, children, and pets_ FILMING AT TOMMY THOMPSON PARK BEACH METRO February 1, 2021 Full article: Commercial filming at Tommy Thompson Park among items to be discussed at online meeting — Beach Metro Community News Commercial filming at Tommy Thompson Park among items to be discussed at online meeting OFebrraz 1,209 A A Weersakes glare In Tommy Ta^mPson P.W en the Leslie. 9.1 SPS[, 1n, s Desch netr W—fie Phba. f 111111151OWT By JAYSON DRAAANO On Thursday, Feb. 4th, from 630 pm. to 7.30 p. m., the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and PortsTbronto will has? an information webinar on Tommy Thompson Park this week The online event takes place oa Thursday. Feb_ 4 from 630 to 730 p in hems on the agenda will include visiting the park an the Leslie Street Spit during COVID-19, a pedestrian bridge mid construction access road, upwming commercial filming, aquatic habitat restaration and a moderated quesrion-and-answer sessoa The group Friends of the Spit is opposed to wmmescial filming in the area. `The Spit is an wban wilderness, both by our definition, and the TRCA's definition. The Spit is not a backlot for Hollywood North productions. Commercial filmingis incompatible with The Spii," said the group m a statement The Spit is a park; a different park and is fur people and wildlife We do understand the importance of the film industry in Toronte;ben, we also understand and know the importance of The Spit to the citizens d Toronto and to the wildlife on The Spit, especially now,. in these COV@ times Filming should not come at the expense of the Spit° FYiendc raf the Snit s�xs tha i.eslee R(raef Brrit is Ninth Amarirak tirinet remarkahla"rnrhlic blogTD March, 2021 Full article: Jason Momoa series See creates dvstopian village set on Leslie Spit in Toronto (blogto.com) Jason Momoa series See O creates dystopian village set on 4 Leslie Spit in Toronto x.m.l,exuuui we Awad' R, sa�iea S'asilke IhtWa,,nm pte[wC[IO[l saw wmpmI�to few walla. mn a]elle the uss and .. _..leax&ss Ilam amuiLleft m upuue... . fu W sham feu Ne ui-Rslmw, Ihcfve Ceae usiagt7M'e Out fear wads w e. dtyto nau a pa[ of the Ut . slat U" Imuteuokwdul, dysm*m- unbngv taps Stay in the loop ...., ... __ [dors' up.Ir. loon Manors ♦See is hoiYdin an ameziy nllbge ssf Eae�all aLSiss on flee ee:re Spm eraa_tlr� - .,.r mart omarm, pfloem'. from @J1 ,oWWf& IOLR I.wma' a) `*� March 6, 2021 Full Article: Filming at Leslie Street Spit angers local advocates who worry future shoots could harm wildlife I CBC News Filming at Leslie Street Spit angers local advocates who worry future shoots could harm wildlife f v w 16 in TRCA says all productions are wetted for ecological soundness before being green -lit Kate McGillivray - CBC News - Pasted_ Mar O6, 2021 COD AM ET I Last Updated March 6 Members of a citizens group were horrifiedto see a large set spring up on the Leslie Street 5prtin late February- They argue it's hat the right place for laTae productions- {Submitted by CV Riley i 71 comments A recent film shoot on the Leslie Street Spit is opening up a conversation about whether film shoots should be allowed in the area. The shoot, for an Apple TV series called See that srars Jason MOM oar has now wrapped — but members of the citizen advocacy group Friends of the Spit remain concerned about the long- term impacts on habitat for wildlife. COMMUNITY NEWS: SKATING AT PONDS •IedonEnterprise.com Full Article: The Ice Angel and the Palgrave pond rinks (caledonenterprise.com) The Ice Angel and the Palgrave pond rinks Winters arrival is marked by carefu I iy ptowed; outdoor hockey rinks surrounded by an icy track, says Tayler Par no by By FaiRer9araehi Cal Son Enterprise Wetlnestlay, Fehusry 19 2921 f v 0 For mare than 170 years, th e'm ill pan d' has been a centrepiece of Palgrave The pond, tormed by a control dam along a branch of the Humber River, stared water needed by the mill, which cut the timber for its buildings and ground the grains that supported villagers and their livestock i n the northeast corner of what is now Caledc n..In winter, former Mayor Marc lyn Morrison wrote several years ago-' ICe would be cut from the mi I i pond (ahot t two -feet thick) and nearby Gibson take and sold to the dairy farmers hotels, stores, butchers — forst hauled off the pond by horse and sleighs and then later by trucks" For celebrated Canadian artist David Milne. the pond was the inspiration for a painting hanging in the National Gallery. After the death and destruction caused by Hurricane Hazel in 1954, the pond has been controlled by the Toronto and Region Cari at i on Authority. Fort he past 20ye2rs, winter's arrival Was marked by a Can ad tan flag flying over carefully plewed, outdoor hockey rinks surrounded by an Icy track for those who wanted an outdoor placebo skate, our. grandchildren included. February 10, 2021 yahoo!news February 11, 2021 Full Article: Petition to save skating at Palgrave Pond receives positive response (yahoo.com) Petition to save skating at Palgrave Pond receives positive response f W The Caledon community was recently shaken by well-knownand popular Palgrave pond 0 being put under fire by the Toronto Region Conservation Authority. rwa vnsr For over 20 years, Caledon residents have spent numerous hours skating, playing hockey How much n need to retir and enjoying the wintertime on the Palgrave Mill Pond. During the past two decades. local resident Ken Hunt has maintained the hockey and skating rinks on the pond for the community. TRENDING Over those years, Hunt has been appreciated for his work maintaining the pond, in which he had assistance from both the Rotary Club of Palgrave and the local fire department. The whohawimvir - COVIn-19vacun Town of Caledon has, as well, acknowledged Hunt when he was awarded the Town of Canada studying Caledoris Distinguished Citizen Award. AstraEe� vac Though maintained by Hunt, the pond is owned by the TRCA, who recently and suddenly Leave the mover justihefirstsrel decided to shut down the pond due to ire safety. healing A news release was posted on January t3 on the Conservation Authority's group demanding Russia recalls its fortonsulta h, - residents to stay off all TRCA ponds, lakes, rivers and reservoirs. U5. working on € Whrif AstraZer "Venturing out on the ice is not a permitted activity at TRCA parks," the statement said. Meucu SNAP (SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTION PLAN) FEATURED IN NRU NOVAE RES URBIS February 24, 2021 NOVAE RES RBISI� tib: GREATER TORONTO &HAMILTON AREA BRAMPTON APPROVES SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTION PLAN FOR BRAMALEA MARSHALLING SUSTAINABLE CHANGE rampton city council has approved a Sustainable Neighbourinood Action Plan (SNAP) for a portion of the Bramdea district to advance sustamabIfty, oihan renewal, and climate action priorities on aloraized. scale. The SNAP program was annually developed by me Tomnto and Reglan Conservation Authorlty (TRICA) as a pilot project in 2009. The program takes a co9ahorative, neighboushood- based approach to advanang urban renewal and climate action in older urban areas, and aligns municipal sustainability chjecuves with local continually needs. Them are now over a dozen SNAP; acres Ontario, Including five in Pert Reglaa,and two in Brampton—in County Court and Fitrtdwrk Creek "The Wei behurd the Program is that these big issues Na rr Kitan is them" TRCA sustainable neighbourhoods senior program massager Shaunou Logan told NRU. `We can work with everytme at a neighbourhood scale, across properly Braes: we ran work with the community and new partners on planned projects that will achieve more than we would have achieved in isdatiun. ifs all about bringing togelher the idereats of government and community to support change on the ground" Known as Canada's fust Satellite city and envisioned as a anew town separate from Brampaon. the Brama3ea district was graduallydeveloped between 1960 and 1980- Each section of Bramaiea and its. streets, parks, and schools are themed according to a dtderent letter of the alphabeL Today, Bmmalea is home to appraumately 17,000 people, aceommodaung a variety of n.,m E,,.. , —.,..;,.e r...,,..;; The Bramalea SNAP corresponds to the K. L ami F .sections of Bramaiea, hounded by Queen Street to the north, Clark Aventine and Balarm a3 Drive to the south, an" Paris and Bramahm Road to the west, andTmisram Road to the east. The K section is dominated by high-demityresidential buddmgs, with a coanmercrd plaza and Knightsbridge Park serving as community amenities. The eastern section (E. and F) is mainly populated by low-density, single-detuhed and sernidelached homes mrrinnanr 11 `Phar o1 Hour Nathan, a tial ks inil running Won Ins Slaw Cnskva,o of he Cia tt III 1n HI HILL. Its Issashos.ponds aid nuadkers aid steric hwdges sat hmr2ralksatt adAal sludeils, hikes, cycnsls, and in sinter, non-ciunfp Was, Pu twin net irmnmle 401114 onto stn€ag tads or a Stan to hdgthr own and raiders edam psnplr auris lin GRA and hrypoa 0 las! sauna tat huslness aggntunllles In Man VN. Sea dory, paged. HWY 413 CANADA'S* NATIONAL OBSERVER March 12, 2021 Full article: Ford government's Hwy. 413 dreams fade as another municipality pulls support I National Observer CANADA'S* NATIONAL OBSERVER ARCUr NEWS CPNRCN CCNVndSATgNS ANA ns FEATURES SPECIAL RE R`75 CANALU h'aW PODCAST Q Ford government's Hwy. 413 dreams fade as another municipality pulls support B'd " ,a McIntosh I Neva, Poinics I March 12th 2D21 <Previousszaiy Dnta€ios Feel Region pulled its support for the Ford government's plan to build highway through the Greenbelt on Thursday, joining a flurry of coon* is turning their hacks an the project. Key Learninss and Next Steps 1. MZOs will continue to get traditional media coverage and continue to elicit social media activity. TRCA Communications will actively monitor these issues and prepare messaging proactively to be ready for quick response. 2. Our video content performs very well. TRCA Communications will explore ways to include more video in our social channels. 3. Our partnership network is an asset who can amplify our message. TRCA Communications will aim to improve coordination and partnership with our partners' marketing departments. Section IV — Ontario Regulation 166/06, As Amended APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, written permission from the Authority is required for: a) straightening, changing, diverting or interfering in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream or watercourse, or for changing or interfering in any way with a wetland; b) development, if in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches or pollution or the conservation of land may be affected by the development. A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land is affected. Moved by: Gordon Highet Seconded by: Joanne Dies THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, for the applications which are listed below: CARRIED MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION 11.1 — REGULAR — FOR APPROVAL Applications that involved a more complex suite of technical studies to demonstrate consistency with policies; applications that cover a significant geographic area, extensive modifications to the landscape, major infrastructure projects, applications requiring site specific conditions and permissions that extend beyond two years. CITY OF PICKERING 11.1 UNIQUE AT HOLDING CORPORATION; NAL -BAND HOLDINGS; GESTION NAL - BAND INC.; CITY OF PICKERING To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Lot 21, Concession 1, (1458 Bayly Street, 1466 Bayly Street, 1470 Bayly Street, Krosno Creek Lands), in the City of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Watershed as located on the property owned by Unique At Holding Corporation; Nal - Band Holdings; Gestion Nal -Band Inc.; City of Pickering. The purpose is to implement Phase 1 of the rehabilitation of a 250 m stretch of the east side of Krosno Creek slope and install associated sanitary and storm water infrastructure to facilitate the development of Universal City at 1458 Bayly Street, 1466 Bayly Street, 1470 Bayly Street, and the City -owned Krosno Creek Lands in the City of Pickering. MAP LOCATION: 14H 1466 a 1470 gayly street, Kromo creek Lands PNE The permit will be issued for the period of May 14, 2021 to May 13, 2023 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: • Drawing GEO-1, Interim Channel Restoration Design Plan and Profile, prepared by Geomorphix, stamped by Paul V. Villard, P. Geo, Revision 2, revised April 8, 2021, received April 9, 2021; • Drawing DET -1, Interim Channel Restoration Details, prepared by Geomorphix, stamped by Paul V. Villard, P. Geo, Revision 2, revised April 8, 2021, received April 9, 2021; • Drawing DET -2, Interim Channel Restoration Details, prepared by Geomorphix, stamped by Paul V. Villard, P. Geo, Revision 2, revised April 8, 2021, received April 9, 2021; • Drawing PESC-1, Phasing and Erosion and Sediment Control Planform and Details, prepared by Geomorphix, stamped by Paul V. Villard, P. Geo, Revision 2, revised April 8, 2021, received April 9, 2021; • Drawing RES -1, Restoration Design Planting Plan, prepared by Geomorphix, stamped by Paul V. Villard, P. Geo, Revision 2, revised April 8, 2021, received April 9, 2021; • Monitoring Plan Letter, prepared by Geomorphix, dated February 24, 2021, received March 1, 2021; • Drawing ESC -1A, Erosion Sediment Control Plan for Interim Channel, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers, Revision 3, revised February 19, 2021, stamped by H. Sarkissian, P. Eng., on February 19, 2021, received April 9, 2021; • Drawing ESC -2A, Erosion Sediment Control Details for Interim Channel, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers, Revision 2, revised December 8, 2020, stamped by H. Sarkissian, P. Eng., on December 8, 2020, received April 9, 2021; • Drawing INT -CH -1, Plan and Profile Proposed Interim Krosno Creek Channel, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers, Revision 2, revised December 8, 2020, stamped by H. Sarkissian, P. Eng., on December 8, 2020, received April 9, 2021; Drawing INT -CH -2, Proposed Interim Channel Sections, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers, Revision 2, revised December 8, 2020, stamped by H. Sarkissian, P. Eng., on December 8, 2020, received April 9, 2021; Drawing INT -CH -3, Proposed Interim Channel Sections, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers, Revision 2, revised December 8, 2020, stamped by H. Sarkissian, P. Eng., on December 8, 2020, received April 9, 2021. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The proposal is to implement Phase 1 of the rehabilitation of a 250 m stretch of the east side of Krosno Creek and install storm and sanitary pipes and manholes, storm outfalls and headwalls, stone core wetlands, and a new road cul-de-sac to facilitate the development of Universal City at 1458 Bayly Street, 1466 Bayly Street, 1470 Bayly Street, and the City -owned Krosno Creek Lands in the City of Pickering. Universal City is a multi -tower mixed use development in the City of Pickering's growth centre located east of the Pickering GO station, north of Bayly Street and south of Highway 401. Universal City is currently undergoing phased construction of several residential and commercial towers. The site included the former Art Thompson Arena and is partially located in the Regional Storm Floodplain and adjacent to the City -owned Krosno Creek corridor. The creek was channelized several decades ago and is unable to provide adequate floodplain storage. As a result of the rezoning of the subject sites, TRCA worked with the landowners, City of Pickering and Durham Region to establish a rehabilitated and naturalized creek corridor and buffer / setbacks to contain the floodplain within a widened and reconstructed creek corridor. This permit includes the Phase 1 "interim" works on the east bank of the creek corridor only and does not include work in the channel itself or the west side of the creek bank. Phase 2 which includes the creek channel and the west side of the corridor plus the remaining renaturalization planting will take place at a later date when lands under separate non- participating ownership to the west become available for development. Both phases have been secured by the City of Pickering under a development agreement. Control of Flooding: The subject sites are located partially in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Krosno Creek. The creek corridor will be widened in parts and narrowed elsewhere in order to contain the floodplain within the valley corridor. The applicant submitted a Flood Study and associated flood modelling which have demonstrated to staff satisfaction that there will be no impact on up or down stream flood storage or flows. The Region of Durham has confirmed that they are satisfied that the proposal will have no impact on the Bayly Street right-of-way. Pollution: Temporary sediment controls have been provided per the Greater Golden Horseshoe Area Conservation Authorities, Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Urban Construction. These include utilizing a temporary coffer dam and/or turbidity curtain and, if needed, a temporary pump, dewatering hose and filter bag discharge. Dynamic Beaches: Not applicable. Erosion: Geotechnical slope stability and geomorphology reports have been reviewed to the satisfaction of TRCA technical staff. An enhanced monitoring plan is in place to ensure any potential future erosion can be addressed. Conservation of Land: Vegetation along the east bank of the creek will be removed and ultimately restored. The creek corridor will be expanded and the portion of the restored slope and buffer has been zoned for natural heritage purposes and will be transferred to the City of Pickering. Plantings Shrub beds and native seed mix will be installed on the restored slope. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 8.5 Valley and Stream Corridors of The Living City Policies for Planning and Development in the Watersheds of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, including policies related to redevelopment and infrastructure. CFN: 63682 - Application M 1043/20/PICK Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: April 9, 2021 RES.#B51/21 - DELEGATED PERMITS Moved by: Gordon Highet Seconded by: Joanne Dies THAT standard delegated permits, permission for routine infrastructure works, minor works letters of approval, and permits after the fact / resolution of violations granted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff, in accordance with Ontario Regulation 166/06, as amended, which are listed below, be received. CARRIED STANDARD PERMITS FOR RECEIPT — STAFF APPROVED AND ISSUED Standard permits are non-complex permissions consistent with TRCA approved policies and procedures and issued for a time period of two years or less. CITY OF BRAMPTON 28 RICHLAND CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a 15.97 sq.m. (172 sq.ft.) sunroom addition and a 15.2 sq.m. (164 sq.ft.) deck attached to the back of the existing house. The subject property is located at 28 Richland Crescent, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 64921 - Application #: 0510/21113RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 23, 2021 6573 MAYFIELD ROAD - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a 69.69 sq.m. (750 sq.ft.) basement and ground floor addition, a 13.74 sq.m. (147.89 sq.ft.) patio and a landscape retaining wall, located to the east of the existing house. The subject property is located at 6573 Mayfield Road, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 64918 - Application #: 0508/21/13RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 30, 2021 11 BELLINI AVENUE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of 690.25 sq.m. (7429.78 sq.ft.) detached single family dwelling, an attached 5 -car parking garage, a driveway, and a septic system. The subject property is located at 11 Bellini Avenue, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 64427 - Application #: 0145/21/13RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 6, 2021 54 MONABELLE CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a second dwelling unit, a below grade entrance, a new window and the enlargement of two windows, located in the basement of the existing house. The subject property is located at 54 Monabelle Crescent, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 64910 - Application #: 0495/21/13RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 21, 2021 30 LAURENTIDE CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a second dwelling unit, two new windows and the enlargement of three windows located in the basement of the existing house. The subject property is located at 30 Laurentide Crescent, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 64585 - Application #: 0308/21/13RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 27, 2021 90 CROCKER DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a second dwelling unit located in the basement of the existing house. The purpose of this permit is also to recognize the construction of a 26.49 sq.m. (285.13 sq.ft.) deck, a patio and a below grade entrance located to the back of the existing house. The subject property is located at 90 Crocker Drive, in the City of Brampton. CFN: 64718 - Application #: 0442/21/113RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 15, 2021 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to rehabilitate Dixie Road from 180 m south of Steeles Avenue to 60 m north of Drew Road, in the City of Brampton. The work will include road resurfacing, replacement of median island, the installation of bus pads and replacement of storm sewers. CFN: 63859 - Application #: 1006/20/13RAM Report Prepared by: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca For information contact: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca Date: April 11, 2021 CITY OF MARKHAM CATHOLIC CEMETERIES AND FUNERAL SERVICES - ARCHDIOCESE OF TORONTO - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure and alter a watercourse on Lot 34, 35, Concession 1, (8361 Yonge Street), in the City of Markham, Don River Watershed to replace three existing driveway culverts located on the property owned by Catholic Cemeteries and Funeral Services - Archdiocese of Toronto. CFN: 63313 - Application #: 0509/20/MARK Report Prepared by: June Little, extension 5756, email june.little@trca.ca For information contact: June Little, extension 5756, email june.little@trca.ca Date: April 21, 2021 CITY OF MARKHAM - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to undertake construction of a multi -use trail from Warden Avenue to Birchmount Road along the north side of the Rouge Valley River corridor. The project comprises of Area 3, Phase 1 of the implementation of the overall Markham Centre Trail Greenlands Master Plan. No in water works associated with this project. CFN: 61845 - Application #: 0729/19/MARK Report Prepared by: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gamma npila@trca.ca For information contact: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gammanpila@trca.ca Date: March 25, 2021 CITY OF MARKHAM - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake erosion restoration and bank stabilization of two sites located near Bradgate Drive, east of Leslie Street, in the City of Markham. The restoration works will include construction of temporary access from Bronte Road to the erosion sites and installation of toe protection and vegetated rock buttress. CFN: 62375 - Application #: 0103/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gammanpila@trca.ca For information contact: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gammanpila@trca.ca Date: April 13, 2021 CITY OF MARKHAM - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to undertake erosion restoration and bank stabilization located near Highway 7, east of Main Street Unionville, in the City of Markham. The works include removal of debris, installation of toe protection and vegetated rock buttress. CFN: 62377 - Application #: 0121/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gammanpila@trca.ca For information contact: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gammanpila@trca.ca Date: March 29, 2021 CITY OF MARKHAM - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake replacement and up-sizing of existing sanitary and storm sewers on Royal Orchard Boulevard, in West Thornhill (Phase 4) area in the City of Markham. The works include construction of a concrete wingwall at the downstream end of the culvert to accommodate the upgraded storm sewer. Remediation works downstream of the new wingwall and storm sewer, including the restoration and enlargement of the plunge pool at the downstream mouth of the existing box culvert will also be implemented. Restoration of cover over an exposed section of City of Markham sanitary sewer within the creek, and construction of new armourstone creek bank treatment and vegetated buttress will also be completed. CFN: 64016 - Application #: 0120/21/MARK Report Prepared by: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gammanpila@trca.ca For information contact: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gamma npila@trca.ca Date: April 13, 2021 20 SIXPENNY COURT - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of German Mills Creek to facilitate the construction of a replacement retaining wall at 20 Sixpenny Court in the City of Markham. CFN: 59467 - Application #: 0224/18/MARK Report Prepared by: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca For information contact: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca Date: March 18, 2018 63 HEATHERWOOD CRESCENT - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Rouge River Watershed to facilitate the development of an in -ground swimming pool and landscaping located at 63 Heatherwood Crescent in City of Markham. CFN: 64839 - Application #: 0480/21/MARK Report Prepared by: Dan Nguyen, extension 5306, email dan.nguyen@trca.ca For information contact: Dan Nguyen, extension 5306, email dan.nguyen@trca.ca Date: April 19, 2021 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 4224 GREYBROOK CRESCENT - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a 25.72 sq.m. (276.84 sq.ft.) 2 storey addition and a 16.35 sq.m. (175.98 sq.ft.) deck attached to the back of the house. The subject property is located at 4224 Greybrook Crescent, in the City of Mississauga. CFN: 64723 - Application #: 0481/21/MISS Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 30, 2021 CITY OF PICKERING 1133373 ONTARIO INC. AND NORTH PICKERING COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT INC. - Duff ins Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct interim stormwater management facilities (SWMF) 24 and 25 to support and address drainage related to Regional road segments associated with Peter Matthews Drive (permitted in June 2019, C-191072, CFN 58953) and Alexander Knox Road (currently under -going a separate permit review, CFN 62458). Only a small portion of this work (generally the outfalls) is located within a TRCA regulated area. These works are part of the servicing for the new Seaton community in the City of Pickering and were previously reviewed through the Central Pickering Development Plan Class Environmental Assessment (EA) for Regional Services (June 2014). No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63865 - Application #: 1027/20/PICK Report Prepared by: Sharon Lingertat, extension 5717, email sharon.lingertat@trca.ca For information contact: Sharon Lingertat, extension 5717, email sharon.lingertat@trca.ca Date: April 30, 2021 NORTH PICKERING COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT INC. - Duffins Creek Watershed The purpose is to install a 750 mm diameter watermain along the future Burkholder Drive (Sideline 24), in the City of Pickering. CFN: 62369 - Application #: 1141/19/PICK Report Prepared by: Caroline Mugo, extension 5689, email caroline.mugo@trca.ca For information contact: Caroline Mugo, extension 5689, email caroline.mugo@trca.ca Date: April 20, 2021 CITY OF RICHMOND HILL CITY OF RICHMOND HILL - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake replacement of a pedestrian bridge and improvements to playground in the Windham Parkette, north of Naughton Drive and west of Yonge Street in the City of Richmond Hill. The works will include the construction of an 11 m long prefabricated bridge and replacement of an existing playground features with a similar type of equipment. CFN: 64015 - Application #: 1199/20/RH Report Prepared by: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gamma npila@trca.ca For information contact: Harsha Gammanpila, extension 5629, email harsha.gammanpila@trca.ca Date: May 2, 2021 123 LAKE AVENUE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool and associated grading works at 123 Lake Avenue, in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 64836 - Application #: 0467/211RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: April 20, 2021 81 DEERWOOD CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool at the rear of an existing dwelling at 81 Deerwood Crescent, in the City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 64577 - Application #: 0363/211RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: April 20, 2021 UNICORR LTD. - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Rouge River Watershed to facilitate the development of a minor expansion to an existing parking lot associated with an existing commercial building located at 68B Leek Crescent, City of Richmond Hill. CFN: 59174 - Application #: 0026/18/RH Report Prepared by: Michelle Bates, extension 5618, email michelle.bates@trca.ca For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324, email quentin.hanchard@trca.ca Date: April 19, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) AMSTAR 2278 WESTON LTD. (ONTARIO) - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to convert the parking garage of the existing multi -unit residential building into two new dwelling units at 2278 Weston Road in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York). CFN: 64077 - Application #: 1214/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Nicole Moxley, extension 5968, email nicole.moxley@trca.ca For information contact: Nicole Moxley, extension 5968, email nicole.moxley@trca.ca Date: March 3, 2021 161 VEROBEACH BOULEVARD - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a larger two-storey replacement dwelling with a rear deck and steps at 161 Verobeach Boulevard in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 63555 - Application #: 0753/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 16, 2021 47 BECKETT AVENUE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a second storey addition over the existing footprint, a two-storey front and side addition, a rear deck and to replace a basement walkout to the one -storey single family dwelling at 47 Beckett Avenue in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 64459 - Application #: 0234/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: April 22, 2021 20 RAVENSCREST DRIVE - Mimico Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct a new two storey single family detached dwelling at 20 Ravenscrest Drive in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 56804 - Application #: 1139/16/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: April 13, 2021 19 SAXONY CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a pool and spa to the rear of the existing split-level, detached single family dwelling at 19 Saxony Crescent in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 64453 - Application #: 0215/211TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 19, 2021 43 CORNELIUS PARKWAY - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct an on -ground pool and to replace a rear deck at 43 Cornelius Parkway in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area). CFN: 64748 - Application #: 0431/211TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rapus@trca.ca Date: May 3, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 209 RIVERVIEW DRIVE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a rear deck and basement walkout to the side of the existing two storey detached dwelling at 209 Riverview Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 63832 - Application #: 1020/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: April 29, 2021 CAP REIT - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a new concrete pad to support a mechanical fan system at 44 Stubbs Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 64732 - Application #: 0393/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: April 27, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct new 675 mm and 1200 mm diameter sanitary sewers, construct two new 250 mm diameter forcemains, reconstruct approximately 200 m of the Don River channel, and remove the failed concrete weir structure at 1240 Sheppard Avenue East, northwest of Sheppard Avenue East and Leslie Street, in the City of Toronto. CFN: 63797 - Application #: 0937/201TOR Report Prepared by: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca For information contact: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca Date: May 4, 2021 28 CEDARBANK CRESCENT - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a pool, pool equipment storage structure, rear terrace and associated landscaping to the rear of the existing dwelling at 28 Cedarbank Crescent in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 63644 - Application #: 0797/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: April 20, 2021 GRAYWOOD 250 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a new 9 storey condominium with 3 levels of underground parking at 250 Lawrence Avenue West and 219 Glengarry Avenue in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 64736 - Application #: 0408/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: April 15, 2021 HOLLAND BLOORVIEW KIDS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a rear addition to the existing fourth and fifth floor of Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital - 150 Kilgour Road in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 64454 - Application #: 0219/211T OR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: April 30, 2021 11 ALDERBROOK DRIVE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a suspension bridge and perform channel restoration at the rear (south) of an existing residential lot located at 11 Alderbrook Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 64637 - Application #: 0355/211TOR Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email steph an i e.worron@trca.ca Date: April 8, 2021 129 MILDENHALL ROAD - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two storey replacement dwelling with pool, patio, basement walkout and associated hard landscaping at 129 Mildenhall Road in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council). CFN: 64456 - Application #: 0216/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 27, 2021 6 MYLESVIEW PLACE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two storey replacement dwelling at 6 Mylesview Place in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 64435 - Application #: 0158/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: April 23, 2021 111 BANSTOCK DRIVE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a second storey addition to the existing single family dwelling at 111 Banstock Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council). CFN: 63655 - Application #: 0830/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rapus@trca.ca Date: April 30, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) CITY OF TORONTO - Highland Creek Watershed The purpose is to reconstruct the south access road, upgrade the existing South Effluent Pumping Station, and construct access to the station's outfall shaft at the Highland Creek Treatment Plant (HCTP) in the City of Toronto. CFN: 63510 - Application #: 0729/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Margie Akins, extension 5925, email margie.akins@trca.ca For information contact: Margie Akins, extension 5925, email margie.akins@trca.ca Date: April 8, 2021 IMH 1320 DANFORTH LTD. & IMH 1330 DANFORTH LTD. - Highland Creek Watershed The purpose is to undertake concrete repairs to the existing balconies on the four storey multi - residential building at 1320 Danforth Road in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area). CFN: 64759 - Application #: 0539/211TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: May 3, 2021 75 FISHLEIGH DRIVE - Waterfront Watershed The purpose is to construct a two storey replacement dwelling with attached rear deck where an existing one storey single family detached dwelling is currently located at 75 Fishleigh Drive in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area). CFN: 60561 -Application #: 1094/18/TOR Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 8, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) CITY OF TORONTO - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct new storm sewers on Catherine Street and Old Mill Drive as part of the Basement Flooding Protection Area 5 Program, south of Humberview Road, in the City of Toronto. In/near water works will occur as part of outfall construction. CFN: 63622 - Application #: 0870/201TOR Report Prepared by: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca For information contact: Luka Medved, extension 5766, email luka.medved@trca.ca Date: April 12, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO - Don River Watershed The purpose is to remove and replace an existing 300 mm diameter concrete storm sewer with a new 375 mm diameter pvc storm sewer located on O'Connor Drive, between Glenwood Crescent and Sandra Road, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 64673 - Application #: 0334/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca For information contact: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca Date: May 4, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a new storage shed at 30 Northline Road, just west of Dohme Avenue, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 64674 - Application #: 0336/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca For information contact: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca Date: March 31, 2021 D.D. 68 HILLSIDE LTD. - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a rear basement walkout, a shed and to carry out site grading at 68 Hillside Drive in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 64756 - Application #: 0538/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 29, 2021 10 BARBARA CRESCENT - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a pool and associated patio to the rear of the two-storey single family dwelling at 10 Barbara Crescent in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 64612 - Application #: 0258/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: March 31, 2021 446 LAKE FRONT - Waterfront Watershed The purpose is to construct a rear deck, basement walkout, hot tub, landing and stairs to the existing two storey single family dwelling at 446 Lake Front. The proposed works also include a new landing, stairs and cabana along with a shed and at grade boardwalk. CFN: 64447 - Application #: 0190/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: April 1, 2021 15 GLEN OAK DRIVE - Waterfront Watershed The purpose is to construct a second -storey addition over portions of the existing footprint and a two-storey front addition to the existing two-storey single family dwelling at 15 Glen Oak Drive in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 62198 - Application #: 1044/19/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 21, 2021 16 MINTO STREET - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a larger three-storey single family replacement dwelling at 16 Minto Street in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 64958 - Application #: 0520/211TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 23, 2021 54 DAVIES CRESCENT - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a second storey addition to the existing single storey detached dwelling at 54 Davies Crescent in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). The proposal also includes a rear two storey and side addition, basement walkout, rear terrace and stairs. CFN: 63365 - Application #: 0609/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: May 4, 2021 16 WILDWOOD CRESCENT - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a replacement deck, terrace and retaining wall to the rear of the existing two storey semi detached dwelling at 16 Wildwood Crescent in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 61402 - Application #: 0387/19/TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: April 20, 2021 229 RIVERSIDE DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two-storey replacement dwelling with an integral garage and rear terrace at 229 Riverside Drive in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 60564 - Application #: 1090/18/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rapus@trca.ca Date: April 5, 2021 SIDCORP NORTH INC. - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a two-storey rear addition with a rear deck and basement walkout to the existing two-storey single family dwelling at 529 Donlands Avenue in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 64320 - Application #: 0125/211TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark. rapus@trca.ca Date: April 29, 2021 SWANSEA VILLAGE CO-OP - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to refurbish the existing garbage pad located in the rear parking lot of the residential apartment building at 77 Coe Hill Drive in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 56806 - Application #: 1151/16/TOR Report Prepared by: Nicole Moxley, extension 5968, email nicole.moxley@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 23, 2021 47 LEWIS STREET - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct a second storey addition over the existing building footprint and a rear deck to the two-storey single family dwelling at 47 Lewis Street in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). The proposal also involves construction of a two-storey laneway suite to the rear. CFN: 64621 - Application #: 0288/211TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: May 6, 2021 3 PASADENA GARDENS - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to construct a pergola, deck and porch to the existing dwelling at 3 Pasadena Gardens in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area). CFN: 64626 - Application #: 0316/211TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: April 19, 2021 WATERFRONT TORONTO - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake wet excavation west of the west plug wall (wet side), installation of the subaqueous barrier system, and demolition of the west dock wall and a small portion of the north wall at the Polson slip, in the City of Toronto. These are enabling works associated with the redevelopment of the Toronto Port Lands Flood Protection and Don Mouth Naturalization project and are being approved under the current delegated permit approval process per RES #B138/13. CFN: 64664 - Application #: 0287/211TOR Report Prepared by: Sharon Lingertat, extension 5717, email sharon.lingertat@trca.ca For information contact: Sharon Lingertat, extension 5717, email sharon.lingertat@trca.ca Date: April 19, 2021 CITY OF VAUGHAN 2097500 ONTARIO LTD. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake final grading and servicing works with TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate servicing and development works associated with residential Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision 19T -07V01. The subject property is located within Planning Block 40, on lands known municipally as 4077 Teston Road, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 60070 - Application #: 0625/181VAUG Report Prepared by: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca For information contact: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca Date: July 6, 2018 174 RIVERVIEW AVENUE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 31 sq.m (334 sq.ft) addition to the ground floor and the second floor. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 174 Riverview Avenue, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 64700 - Application #: 0371/211VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: March 24, 2021 164 RIVERSIDE DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 29 sq.m (312 sq.ft) swimming pool and associated pool patio. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 164 Riverside Drive, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 64705 - Application #: 0486/21/VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: April 20, 2021 CITY OF VAUGHAN - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to rehabilitate roads such as removal and replacement of top and base asphalt and rehabilitate watermain within the road right-of-way (ROW) on several roads located near Islington Avenue and Highway 7, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 64027 - Application #: 1220/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca For information contact: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email man iru l.islam@trca.ca Date: April 20, 2021 5 HONEY LOCUST COURT - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Don River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 57 sq.m (608 sq.ft) swimming pool and a 37 sq. m (398 sq. ft) cabana. The property is located on lands known municipally as 5 Honey Locust Court in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 64690 - Application #: 0364/211VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: March 24, 2021 236 STORMONT TRAIL - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 36 sq.m (391 sq.ft) swimming pool and associated pool patio. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 236 Stormont Trail, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 64843 - Application #: 0463/211VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: April 14, 2021 MONARCH CASTLEPOINT KIPLING NORTH DEVELOPMENT LTD. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to allow development within a Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed to facilitate grading and servicing in a draft approved plan of subdivision (19T -13V009) within Block 55 East, west of Kipling Avenue and south of Kirby Road, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 64693 - Application #: 0366/21/VAUG Report Prepared by: Stephen Bohan, extension 5743, email stephen.bohan@trca.ca For information contact: Stephen Bohan, extension 5743, email stephen.bohan@trca.ca Date: March 24, 2021 MONARCH CASTLEPOINT KIPLING NORTH DEVELOPMENT LTD. AND MONARCH CASTLEPOINT KIPLING SOUTH DEVELOPMENT LTD. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to allow development within a Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed to facilitate the construction of a pedestrian trail system, installation of a pedestrian bridge and implementation of edge management / restoration plantings in two draft approved plans of subdivision (19T -13V009 and 19T -13V008) within Block 55 East, west of Kipling Avenue and north of Teston Road, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 64694 - Application #: 0367/21NAUG Report Prepared by: Stephen Bohan, extension 5743, email step hen. bohan@trca.ca For information contact: Stephen Bohan, extension 5743, email stephen.bohan@trca.ca Date: March 24, 2021 MONARCH CASTLEPOINT KIPLING SOUTH DEVELOPMENT LTD. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to allow development within a Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed to facilitate grading and servicing in a draft approved plan of subdivision (19T -13V008) within Block 55 East, west of Kipling Avenue and north of Teston Road, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 64692 - Application #: 0365/211VAUG Report Prepared by: Stephen Bohan, extension 5743, email step hen. bohan@trca.ca For information contact: Stephen Bohan, extension 5743, email stephen.bohan@trca.ca Date: April 20, 2021 PRIMA VISTA ESTATES INC. 1840999 ONTARIO LTD. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to facilitate, within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed, final grading and servicing and the installation of erosion and sediment control measures in a draft approved residential plan of subdivision (19T -03V05) within Block 40, on lands known municipally as 4333 Teston Road, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 63185 - Application #: 0413/20NAUG Report Prepared by: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca For information contact: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca Date: April 21, 2021 14 ROSLYN COURT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 22.3 sq.m (240 sq.ft) swimming pool and associated pool patio. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 14 Roslyn Court, in the City of Vaughan. CFN: 64541 - Application #: 0290/21NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: March 11, 2021 TOWN OF AJAX 36 NOAKE CRESCENT - Duff ins Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct a deck in the rear yard of the existing two storey dwelling at 36 Noake Crescent in the Town of Ajax. CFN: 64602 - Application #: 0341/21/AJAX Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: May 5, 2021 10 DUCKFIELD CRESCENT - Carruthers Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct an in -ground pool and concrete patio in the rear yard of the existing dwelling at 10 Duckfield Crescent in the Town of Ajax. CFN: 64340 - Application #: 0252/21/AJAX Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: March 31, 2021 2945 SEABREEZE ROAD - Carruthers Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct a detached garage at the rear of an existing single family dwelling located at 2945 Seabreeze Road in the Town of Ajax. CFN: 64605 - Application #: 0351/21/AJAX Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: April 22, 2021 37 ANGIER CRESCENT - Carruthers Creek Watershed The purpose is to construct an attached, above grade deck at the rear of an existing two storey single family detached dwelling located at 37 Angier Crescent in the Town of Ajax. CFN: 64607 - Application M 0383/21/AJAX Report Prepared by: Stephanie Worron, extension 5907, email stephanie.worron@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: April 19, 2021 TOWN OF CALEDON 2007916 ONTARIO INC. - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to facilitate, within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed, grading and drainage infrastructure in support of a logistics office and outdoor truck storage yard in addition to remediation related to a historical fill violation on lands known municipally as 33 Perdue Court, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64829 - Application M 0447/21/CAL Report Prepared by: Anthony Syhlonyk, extension 5272, email anthony.syhlonyk@trca.ca For information contact: Anthony Syhlonyk, extension 5272, email anthony.syhlonyk@trca.ca Date: April 13, 2021 170 CONNAUGHT CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within the TRCA Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of 2.74 m by 4.88 m (9 ft. by 16 ft.) semi in - ground swimming pool with a 6.71 m by 7.01 m (22 ft. by 23 ft.) enclosed deck surrounding the pool at the rear of the existing residential dwelling, associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 170 Connaught Crescent, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64709 - Application #: 0455/21/CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 13, 2021 134 SACKVILLE STREET - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within the TRCA Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a pavilion/pergola at the rear of the existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 134 Sackville Street, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64712 - Application #: 0454/21/CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 13, 2021 13926 CHINGUACOUSY ROAD - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 15.24 m by 60.96 m (50 ft. by 200 ft.) metal storage building located at the rear northwest of the existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 13926 Chinguacousy Road, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64916 - Application #: 0507/21/CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 21, 2021 103 GRAY PARK DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within the TRCA Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a replacement deck including a spa on concrete pad within the footprint of the existing deck located at the rear of the existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 103 Gray Park Drive, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64553 - Application #: 0275/211CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: March 9, 2021 19 BAMBI TRAIL - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within the TRCA Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 16.60 sq. m (178.73 sq.ft.) three season unheated sunroom addition at the rear of the existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 19 Bambi Trail, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64594 - Application #: 0386/21/CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: March 26, 2021 8 HUNTSMILL DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 18.62 sq.m. front covered porch, the addition of two balconies with a total area of 23.97 sq.m., ground floor additions with a total area of 24.74 sq.m., and a 134.45 sq.m. second floor addition to the existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 8 Huntsmill Drive, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64590 - Application #: 0443/211CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 13, 2021 12 OAK KNOLL DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the development of a 36.88 sq.m. (396.97 sq.ft.) deck, a 79 sq.m. (850.34 sq.ft.) in -ground pool, a 5.57 sq.m. (59.95 sq.ft.) shed, a 11.14 sq.m. (119.9 sq.ft) Pergola, patio and landscaping walls, located to the back of the existing house. The subject property is located at 12 Oak Knoll Drive, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 63918 - Application #: 1102/201CAL Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 5, 2021, 2021 29 PINEBROOK CIRCLE - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within the TRCA Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of an in -ground swimming pool at the rear of the existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 29 Pinebrook Circle, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64593 - Application #: 0387/211CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: March 26, 2021 TOWN OF CALEDON - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake rehabilitation of an existing culvert on Cold Creek West crossing on Castlederg Side Road, located 0.5 km west of Mount Pleasant Road, in the Town of Caledon. The proposed works will be completed in dry working conditions. CFN: 64667 - Application #: 0301/21/CAL Report Prepared by: Shirin Varzgani, extension 5785, email shirin.varzgani@trca.ca For information contact: Shirin Varzgani, extension 5785, email shirin.varzgani@trca.ca Date: April 29, 2021 8 EAGLE NEST COURT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 103.49 sq.m. (1113.96 sq.ft.) ground floor addition, a 59.44 sq.m. (639.81 sq.ft.) second storey addition, a 55.69 sq.m. (599.44 sq.ft.) pool cabana, minor roof extension, replacement and reconfiguration of in -ground pool, additional concrete patio area for firepit and lounge areas located at the rear of the existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 8 Eagle Nest Court, in the Town of Caledon. CFN: 64710 - Application #: 0384/211CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: March 26, 2021 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE 67 AUTOMALL BOULEVARD - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Rouge River Watershed associated with the development of a service drive-thru addition and new EV - charging stations for an existing automobile dealership located at 67 Automall Boulevard, Town of Whitch urch-Stouffville. CFN: 64566 - Application #: 0281/21NVS Report Prepared by: Michelle Bates, extension 5618, email michelle.bates@trca.ca For information contact: Michelle Bates, extension 5618, email michelle.bates@trca.ca Date: April 7, 2021 63 MARKET STREET - Duffins Creek Watershed The purpose is to place approximately 30 cubic metres of fill on the property, construct an addition to an existing house, reconstruct a garage, and install a series of infiltration trenches in the rear yard of the property known municipally as 63 Market Street in the Community of Stouffville in the Town of Whitch urch-StouffviIle. CFN: 64476 - Application #: 0155/21NVS Report Prepared by: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca For information contact: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca Date: February 5, 2021 TOWNSHIP OF KING 4875 15TH SIDEROAD - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within the TRCA Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of an in -ground swimming pool including a patio area, pool equipment area and pool enclosure fence located at the rear west side of the existing residential dwelling associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 4875 15th Sideroad, in the Township of King. CFN: 64703 - Application #: 0487/21/KING Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 20, 2021 11 CRANBERRY LANE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to facilitate, within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River watershed, the development of a new single family dwelling with a footprint of 187.6 sq. m. (2020 sq ft.), 638 sq. ft. (59.2 sq. m.) patio, and associated grading on lands known municipally as 11 Cranberry Lane, in the Township of King. CFN: 64845 - Application #: 0461/211KING Report Prepared by: Anthony Syhlonyk, extension 5272, email anthony.syhlonyk@trca.ca For information contact: Jason Wagler, extension 5370, email jason.wagler@trca.ca Date: April 14, 2021 75 LYNWOOD CRESCENT - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in order to facilitate the construction of a 246.01 sq. m (2,648 sq. ft.) replacement single family two storey residential dwelling with walkout basement, including attached garage and a 39.48 sq.m. (425 sq. ft.) concrete walk -out deck area and first storey deck above, all associated with a municipal building permit. The subject property is located at 75 Lynwood Crescent, in the Township of King. CFN: 64697 - Application #: 0390/21/KING Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: March 26, 2021 TOWNSHIP OF KING - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to undertake emergency culvert replacement works for two corrugated steel pipe (CSP) culverts located on private property northwest of Highway 27 and King Road, in the Community of Nobleton. The existing 1.2 m diameter by 92 m long culvert located adjacent to the rear lot lines of 95 - 83 Hawman Avenue will be replaced with a 1.4 m diameter polymer coated CSP culvert of the same length. The existing 1.2 m diameter by 45 m long culvert located along the front of 6100 - 6108 King Road will be replaced with twin polymer coated CSPs of the same diameter and length. Both of the culverts will be replaced in dry working condition. The Township of King has acquired the easements from the private land owners to complete the proposed works. This permit is in accordance with TRCA Permission for Emergency Infrastructure Works Review Protocol (Authority Res. #At 05/15). CFN: 64781 - Application #: 0423/211KING Report Prepared by: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca For information contact: Manirul Islam, extension 5715, email manirul.islam@trca.ca Date: April 29, 2021 PERMISSION FOR ROUTINE INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR RECEIPT — STAFF APPROVED AND ISSUED Permission for Routine Infrastructure Works, including Emergency Infrastructure Works permissions, are subject to authorization by staff designated as Enforcement Officers as per Authority Res. #A198/13 and #A103/15, respectively. All routine and emergency infrastructure works are located within a regulated area, generally within or adjacent to the hazard or natural feature and in the opinion of staff do not affect the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land. CITY OF BRAMPTON ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 10 Hedgedale Road, south of Steeles Avenue, in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Brampton as per the Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 SC HP gas pipeline at 10 Hedgedale Road, south of Steeles Avenue, in the City of Brampton. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64799 - Application #: 0407/21/13RAM Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangel i@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangel i@trca.ca Date: April 16, 2021 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 21 Cavendish Crescent, east of Dixie Road, in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Brampton as per the Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 21 Cavendish Crescent, east of Dixie Road, in the City of Brampton. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64807 - Application #: 0432/21/13RAM Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangel i@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangel i@trca.ca Date: April 21, 2021 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway along New Pines Trail, west of Heart Lake Road, in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Brampton as per the Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 4 PE IP gas pipeline along New Pines Trail, west of Heart Lake Road, in the City of Brampton. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64890 - Application #: 0479/211BRAM Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca Date: April 27, 2021 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL To undertake road/pathway resurfacing or reconstruction on Bovaird Drive from 80 m west of Hurontario Street to Highway 410, in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by the Regional Municipality of Peel. The purpose is to rehabilitate Bovaird Drive from 80 m west of Hurontario Street to Highway 410, in the City of Brampton. The work will include removal and resurfacing of the road, storm sewer removal, replacement and cleaning and guiderail removal and replacement. CFN: 64023 - Application #: 1216/201BRAM Report Prepared by: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca For information contact: Emma Benko, extension 5648, email emma.benko@trca.ca Date: April 19, 2021 CITY OF MARKHAM REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To undertake drainage structure general maintenance on 16th Avenue, 525m east of Reesor Road; 11530 McCowan Road in the City of Markham, Rouge River Watershed; York Durham Line, 335m north of Highway 7; York Durham Line, 1630m north of Major Mackenzie Drive in the City of Markham, Duffins Creek Watershed; York Durham Line, 1727m north of Bethesda Side Road; York Durham Line, 1539m north of Bethesda Side Road, in Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on property owned by the Regional Municipality of York. The purpose is to undertake 6 culverts removal and replacement works located at 16th Avenue, 525m east of Reesor Road; 11530 McCowan Road; York Durham Line, 335m north of Highway 7; York Durham Line, 1630m north of Major Mackenzie Drive, in the City of Markham; York Durham Line, 1727m north of Bethesda Side Road; York Durham Line, 1539m north of Bethesda Side Road in Town of Whitch urch-StouffviIle. The proposed 6 Corrugated Steel Pipe (CSP) culverts will be replaced with the same size of existing culverts. All works will be undertaken in the dry. CFN: 64290 - Application #: 0034/21/MARK Report Prepared by: Nasim Shakouri, extension 5798, email nasim.shakouri@trca.ca For information contact: Nasim Shakouri, extension 5798, email nasim.shakouri@trca.ca Date: April 29, 2021 CITY OF PICKERING TRANS -NORTHERN PIPELINES INC. To undertake structure maintenance within an existing utility easement approximately 500 metres west of Sapphire Drive, located south east of the Taunton Road and Whites Road intersection, in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed, as located on property owned by Infrastructure Ontario and Trans -Northern Pipelines Inc. (TNPI). The purpose is to undertake an integrity dig to inspect an existing oil pipeline within an existing utility easement approximately 500 metres west of Sapphire Drive, located south east of the Taunton Road and Whites Road intersection, in the City of Pickering. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 63866 - Application #: 1026/201PICK Report Prepared by: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca For information contact: Nathan Jenkins, extension 5508, email nathan.jenkins@trca.ca Date: May 5, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) CITY OF TORONTO To undertake road resurfacing or reconstruction on Kipling Avenue, from 2667 Kipling Avenue to 2777 Kipling Avenue, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Toronto. The purpose is to undertake road reconstruction and road resurfacing on Kipling Avenue, from 2667 Kipling Avenue to 2777 Kipling Avenue, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is within the scope of this project. CFN: 64024 - Application #: 1218/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca For information contact: Sierra Camilleri, extension 5631, email sierra.camilleri@trca.ca Date: April 6, 2021 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 132 Humbercrest Boulevard, south of Dundas Street West, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto as per the Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 132 Humbercrest Boulevard, south of Dundas Street West, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64804 - Application #: 0416/211TOR Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca Date: April 19, 2021 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 7 Lake Shore Drive, south of Lake Shore Boulevard West, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto as per the Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 7 Lake Shore Drive, south of Lake Shore Boulevard West, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64878 - Application #: 0439/211TOR Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca Date: April 21, 2021 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 71 North Drive, east of Royal York Road, in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto as per the Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 71 North Drive, east of Royal York Road, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64891 - Application #: 0484/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca Date: May 3, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway along Life Saving Drive, east of Bayview Avenue, in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request. The purpose is to install a NPS 6 ST YJ HP gas header service along Life Saving Drive, east of Bayview Avenue, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64783 - Application #: 0392/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca Date: April 12, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 46 Sunnypoint Crescent, east of Brimley Road South, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto as per the Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 46 Sunnypoint Crescent, east of Brimley Road South, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64893 - Application #: 0501/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangel i@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangel i@trca.ca Date: May 3, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway along Commissioners Street, from Cherry Street to approximately 200 m west of Don Roadway, in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. will be obtaining a permanent easement over the proposed pipeline location. The purpose is to install a NPS 4 ST YJ IP gas pipeline along Commissioners Street, from Cherry Street to approximately 200 m west of Don Roadway, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64775 - Application #: 0359/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangel i@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangel i@trca.ca Date: April 12, 2021 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway at 26 Glencrest Boulevard, south of St Clair Avenue East, in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Toronto as per the Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 1 PE IP gas pipeline at 26 Glencrest Boulevard, south of St Clair Avenue East, in the City of Toronto. No in -water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64798 - Application #: 0406/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca Date: April 16, 2021 CITY OF VAUGHAN ENBRIDGE GAS INC. To undertake sewer, watermain or utility installation or maintenance within an existing roadway along Jane Street and on two new streets in a new development, between Teston Road and Kirby Road, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by a private landowner to whom Enbridge Gas Inc. is providing service at their request and on property owned by the City of Vaughan as per the Franchise Agreement with Enbridge Gas Inc. The purpose is to install a NPS 4 PE IP gas pipeline along Jane Street and on two new streets in a new development, between Teston Road and Kirby Road, in the City of Vaughan. No in - water work is associated with this project. CFN: 64782 - Application #: 0391/211VAUG Report Prepared by: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangel i@trca.ca For information contact: Madison Antonangeli, extension 5650, email mad ison.antonangeli@trca.ca Date: April 9, 2021 MINOR WORKS LETTER OF APPROVAL FOR RECEIPT — STAFF APPROVED AND ISSUED Permission for Minor Works Letter of Approval are issued for works located within a regulated area, adjacent to a natural feature or natural hazard, that do not affect the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land. Permissions include ancillary structures such as decks, garages, sheds, pools and minor fill placement/landscaping. CITY OF BRAMPTON 150 TREELINE BOULEVARD To change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 116, Plan 43M-1429, (150 Treeline Boulevard), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64707 - Application #: 0376/21/BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 12, 2021 45 EASTVIEW GATE To change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 131 L, Plan M1545, (45 Eastview Gate), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64915 - Application M 0505/211BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 22, 2021 22 RICHLAND CRESCENT To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 11, Plan 43M-1517, (22 Richland Crescent), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64909 - Application M 0446/21/BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 16, 2021 85 HOLLOWDROVE BOULEVARD To change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 6, Plan 43M-2027, (85 Hollowgrove Boulevard), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64722 - Application M 0445/211BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 16, 2021 43 EXECUTIVE COURT To change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 24, Plan M1715, (43 Executive Court), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64725 - Application M 0448/21/BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 16, 2021 60 HILLSIDE DRIVE To change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 46, Plan 717, (60 Hillside Drive), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed. CFN: 64717 - Application M 0441/21113RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 15, 2021 7 APPLE VALLEY WAY To change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 33 R, Plan 43M-1842, (7 Apple Valley Way), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64713 - Application #: 0440/21/BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 13, 2021 50 ESTATEVIEW CIRCLE To install a swimming pool on Lot 18, Plan M-322, (50 Estateview Circle), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64914 - Application #: 0502/211113RAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 22, 2021 24 COSMO COURT To construct a ground floor addition or structure greater than 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) but less than 150 sq. m (1614 sq. ft) on Lot 12, Plan M1465, (24 Cosmo Court), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64708 - Application #: 0395/21/BRAM Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: March 30, 2021 CITY OF PICKERING 437 CHURCHWIN STREET To undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 53, 54, Plan 40R-1140, (437 Churchwin Street), in the City of Pickering, Duff ins Creek Watershed. CFN: 64608 - Application #: 0415/211PICK Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: April 12, 2021 1551 WILLOWSIDE COURT To change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 20, Plan M1197, (1551 Willowside Court), in the City of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Watershed. CFN: 64610 - Application #: 0418/21/PICK Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: April 14, 2021 CITY OF RICHMOND HILL 63 VERDI ROAD To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 13, Plan 65M-3711, (63 Verdi Road), in the City of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed. CFN: 64840 - Application #: 0465/211RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: May 5, 2021 10 CANDLELIGHT DRIVE To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 105, Plan 65M-3829, (10 Candlelight Drive), in the City of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed. CFN: 64572 - Application #: 0320/21/RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: April 1, 2021 12 CANDLELIGHT DRIVE To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 104, Plan 65M-3829, (12 Candlelight Drive), in the City of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed. CFN: 64571 - Application #: 0321/211RH Report Prepared by: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca For information contact: Diane Pi, extension 5723, email diane.pi@trca.ca Date: March 31, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 48 WOODGATE DRIVE To install a swimming pool on Lot 2, Plan 3366, (48 Woodgate Drive), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64752 - Application #: 0459/211TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 19, 2021 48 NORVAL STREET To construct a ground floor addition or structure greater than 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) but less than 150 sq. m (1614 sq. ft) on Part Lot 18, Part Lane, Plan 2259, (48 Norval Street), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64326 - Application #: 0132/211TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 14, 2021 59 JASPER AVENUE To change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Part of Lot 21, Lot 22, Plan 1846, (59 Jasper Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64968 - Application #: 0577/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: May 3, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 8 LADYSHOT CRESCENT To undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 11, Plan 7552, (8 Ladyshot Crescent), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64442 - Application #: 0504/211TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 27, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 9 MCNAB BOULEVARD To install a swimming pool and undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) on Lot 28, Plan M647, (9 McNab Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed. CFN: 63553 - Application #: 0751/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: May 5, 2021 10 LEDGE ROAD To install a swimming pool and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 81, Plan M-440, (10 Ledge Road), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed. CFN: 64461 - Application #: 0250/211TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 12, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 155 STRATHEARN ROAD To install a swimming pool, construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) and change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 980, Plan 1870 -YORK, (155 Strathearn Road), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed. CFN: 64735 - Application #: 0404/21/TOR Report Prepared by: Daniel Pina, extension 5250, email daniel.pina@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 13, 2021 CITY OF VAUGHAN 118 STARWOOD ROAD To install a swimming pool on Lot 15, Concession 2, 118 Starwood Road, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed. CFN: 64827 - Application #: 0433/21NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: April 12, 2021 138 SIR STEVENS DRIVE To install a swimming pool on Lot 24, Plan 65M-4064, 138 Sir Stevens Drive, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed. CFN: 64931 - Application #: 0492/211VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: April 23, 2021 8 SEDAN COURT To install a swimming pool on Lot 107, Plan 65M-2115, 8 Sedan Court, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64688 - Application #: 0312/211VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: March 29, 2021 69 NORTHLANE ROAD To install a swimming pool on Lot 50, Plan M-1555, 69 Northlane Road, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64696 - Application #: 0368/21/VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh. razavi@trca.ca Date: March 29, 2021 23 COOKS MILL CRESCENT To install a swimming pool on Part Lot 16, Concession 2, 23 Cooks Mill Crescent, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed. CFN: 64698 - Application #: 0369/21/VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: March 29, 2021 21 BIRCH HILL ROAD To install a swimming pool on Part Lot 9, Concession 7, 21 Birch Hill Road, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64699 - Application #: 0370/21/VAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: March 29, 2021 TOWN OF AJAX 38 PURDUE AVENUE To install a swimming pool and undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) on Lot 19, Plan 40M-2091, (38 Purdue Avenue), in the Town of Ajax, Duff ins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Andras and Anjali Lazar. CFN: 64851 - Application #: 0585/21/AJAX Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: May 6, 2021 39 GALEA DRIVE To install a swimming pool and undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) on Lot 78, Plan 40M2396, (39 Galea Drive), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed. CFN: 64603 - Application #: 0338/211AJAX Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: April 14, 2021 TOWN OF CALEDON 2602453 ONTARIO INC. To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Part Lot 1, Concession 7, (12131 Albion -Vaughan Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 2602453 Ontario Inc. CFN: 64917 - Application #: 0506/21/CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 22, 2021 CBRE LTD. To undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) on Lot 6, Plan 43R-31001, (13153 Coleraine Drive), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by CBRE Ltd. CFN: 64706 - Application #: 0375/21/CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: March 31, 2021 17600 CENTREVILLE CREEK ROAD To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on East Half Lot 29, Concession 2 Albion, (17600 Centreville Creek Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 65040 - Application #: 0548/211CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 29, 2021 IROMET INC. To install a swimming pool on Part Lot 16, Part 2, Concession 9 Albion, (10416 Castlederg Sideroad), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Iromet Inc. CFN: 64913 - Application M 0547/211CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 29, 2021 55 VALLEYSCAPE TRAIL To change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 372, Plan 43M-1961, (55 Valleyscape Trail), in the Town of Caledon, Etobicoke Creek Watershed. CFN: 64912 - Application M 0497/211CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 21, 2021 28 ENGLISH ROSE LANE To on Lot 48, Concession 6 Albion, (28 English Rose Lane), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64592 - Application M 0388/211CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 6, 2021 21 EGAN CRESCENT To install a swimming pool on 21 Egan Crescent, in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64922 - Application M 0511/21/CAL Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 22, 2021 202 BELL AIR DRIVE To install a swimming pool, undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 166, Plan 876, (202 Bell Air Drive), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64715 - Application #: 0453/21/CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 14, 2021 35 MATSON DRIVE To change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 9, Plan M-31, (35 Matson Drive), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64927 - Application #: 0524/211CAL Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 29, 2021 TOWNSHIP OF KING 12622 MILL ROAD To undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) on 12622 Mill Road, in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64933 - Application #: 0493/211KING Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 28, 2021 28 MAHAFFY COURT To install a swimming pool, undertake minor landscaping involving the placement, removal or regrading of material of less than 30 cubic metres (equivalent to 3 truckloads) and construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) on Lot 199, Concession 9 Lot 199, Plan 4448, (28 Mahaffy Court), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed. CFN: 64844 - Application #: 0462/21/KING Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 21, 2021 THETHI HOLDINGS INC. To construct a non -habitable accessory structure up to 50 sq. m (538 sq. ft) and change the use, size, or number of dwelling units of a structure, or undertake work that does not change the footprint of the existing structure on Lot 6, Plan M-2047, (14 Loch Erne Lane), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Thethi Holdings Inc. CFN: 64932 - Application #: 0531/21/KING Report Prepared by: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca For information contact: Andrea Terella, extension 6447, email andrea.terella@trca.ca Date: April 27, 2021 PERMITS AFTER THE FACT / RESOLUTION OF VIOLATIONS FOR RECEIPT — STAFF APPROVED AND ISSUED Permission for works undertaken without the benefit of a TRCA permit in a regulated area, where such works comply with TRCA policies and procedures, are considered permits after the fact and subject to an additional administrative fee. CITY OF MARKHAM 67 HAWKRIDGE AVENUE - Rouge River Watershed The purpose is to recognize an unauthorized sports court and facilitate the development of a new swimming pool and associated landscaping works within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Rouge River Watershed located at 67 Hawkridge Avenue, City of Markham. CFN: 64561 - Application #: 0474/21/MARK Report Prepared by: Michelle Bates, extension 5618, email michelle.bates@trca.ca For information contact: Michelle Bates, extension 5618, email michelle.bates@trca.ca Date: April 23, 2021 59 ELGIN STREET - Don River Watershed The purpose is to undertake works within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Don River Watershed to facilitate the completion of restoration plantings associated with a previously approved dwelling and the completion of a basketball court, fountain/patio area and widening of a driveway which commenced without TRCA permits at 59 Elgin Street, City of Markham. CFN: 63972 - Application #: 1092/20/MARK Report Prepared by: Michelle Bates, extension 5618, email michelle.bates@trca.ca For information contact: Jackie Burkart, extension 5304, email jackie.burkart@trca.ca Date: April 1, 2021 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 4296 GREYBROOK CRESCENT - Etobicoke Creek Watershed The purpose is to recognize the construction of a 37.44 sq.m. (403 sq.ft.) deck attached to the rear and side of the existing house within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed. The works were constructed on 4296 Greybrook Crescent, in the City of Mississauga without the benefit of TRCA or municipal permits. CFN: 64714 - Application #: 0444/21/MISS Report Prepared by: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca For information contact: Lina Alhabash, extension 5657, email lina.alhabash@trca.ca Date: April 15, 2021 CITY OF PICKERING 886 BAYLAWN DRIVE - Frenchman's Bay Watershed The purpose is to legalize a retaining wall and construct an in -ground swimming pool, pool equipment and patio in the rear yard of the existing dwelling at 886 Baylawn Drive in the City of Pickering. CFN: 64849 - Application #: 0518/21/PICK Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311, email steve.heuchert@trca.ca Date: April 27, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) ALKOR 2000 INC. - Don River Watershed The purpose is to legalize the stairs and structural reinforcements to the existing rear sunroom and front porch addition to the existing semi-detached dwelling at 16 Garscadden Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council). CFN: 64068 - Application #: 1201/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: April 13, 2021 93 CHATSWORTH DRIVE - Don River Watershed The purpose is to construct replacement stairs, retaining walls and a hot tub within the backyard of the existing two storey dwelling at 93 Chatsworth Drive in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). Construction has started without the benefit of a TRCA permit. CFN: 63362 - Application #: 0592/201TOR Report Prepared by: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca For information contact: Anna Lim, extension 5284, email anna.lim@trca.ca Date: May 4, 2021 53 PLYMBRIDGE ROAD - Don River Watershed The purpose is to legalize the construction of cabana and outdoor bathroom in the rear yard of the existing single family detached dwelling at 53 Plymbridge Road in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). CFN: 64060 - Application #: 1163/20/TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: May 4, 2021 CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA) 20 CEDARVIEW DRIVE - Highland Creek Watershed The purpose is to legalize the construction of a deck extension, pergola and hot tub on the east side of the existing dwelling and to permit re -surfacing of the existing driveway at 20 Cedarview Drive in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council). CFN: 64076 - Application #: 1212/201TOR Report Prepared by: Terina Tam, extension 6431, email terina.tam@trca.ca For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259, email mark.rapus@trca.ca Date: May 5, 2021 CITY OF VAUGHAN 2323926 ONTARIO INC. C/O CARMINE MACCHIA - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to recognize the replacement of a large shed with a 56 sq.m (600 sq. ft) frame shed (small shed) and a 178 sq.m (1920 sq.ft) frame garage (large shed) within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 9683 Highway 27, in the City of Vaughan. The described works were constructed without TRCA permits. As such, the applicant has paid double the application fee as required for voluntary compliance related to the resolution of a violation of Ontario Regulation 166/06. CFN: 64564 - Application #: 0323/21NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email h amedeh.razavi@trca. ca Date: March 15, 2021 71 DORENGATE DRIVE - Humber River Watershed The purpose is to recognize the construction of a 44 sq.m (474 sq. ft) patio/ retaining wall structure and associated stairs and canopy within TRCA's Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed. The subject property is located on lands known municipally as 71 Dorengate Drive, in the City of Vaughan. The described works were constructed without TRCA permits. As a result, the applicant has paid a double application fee as required for voluntary compliance related to the resolution of the violation of Ontario Regulation 166/06. CFN: 64837 - Application #: 0469/21NAUG Report Prepared by: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh.razavi@trca.ca For information contact: Hamedeh Razavi, extension 5256, email hamedeh. razavi@trca. ca Date: April 14, 2021 CLOSED SESSION Section I — Items for Board of Directors Action RES.#B52/21 - PAID TIME OFF POLICY UPDATES Moved by: Ronald Chopowick Seconded by: Gordon Highet THAT confidential item 12.1 — Paid Time Off Policy Updates be approved. CARRIED ADJOURNMENT ON MOTION by Anthony Perruzza, the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 a.m., on Friday, May 14, 2021. Jennifer Innis Chair 001 John MacKenzie Secretary -Treasurer