Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAuthority 1982 ~ IT A-I the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes AUTHORITY MEETING 1982 02 12 #1/82 The Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Authority was held 82 02 12 at the Borough of York Municipal Offices, 2700 Eglinton Avenue West, Toronto The meeting was called to order at 1300 hours in the Council Chamber PRESENT Chairman Dr J K Reynolds Vice-Chairman Mrs Florence Gell Members W G Barbe r M W H Biggar M J Breen J A Bryson D L Cook R J Fitzpatrick D G Fleet Mrs F Edna Gardner R Gillespie S T Griffiths, RPF Mrs Lois Hancey G Henderson W R Herridge, Q C W J Kelly C F Kline E V Kolb Dr T H Le i th M D Lipton, Q C S A Macpherson F J McKechnie W G McLean ~s S Nimmo P E Oyler F ~ Perkins Mrs M prinsloo J S Scott G B Sinclair M M Sm i th , QC M M R Stewart Mrs Norah Stoner Mrs 8etty ~ucherland William SUlherland 11rs H D Sutter Dr W M Tovell Mrs Alma I'lalker Guests R T D Birchall R J Burgar E H Card '1 R Garrett Harold Kennedy J J McFadden L Pataky F G Shaw W H Steflhenson S B White Staff K G Higgs N A McLean Iv E Jones r E Barber R K Cooper P B Flood ^-2 -2- PRfSp.N'r (Contn. ) Staff ,1 D. ^gnew Mrs K ^ Conron Mrs ^ C Dca ns B E Denney o G. Dyce T. E. Farrell Miss ^. lIayhoe J.W Maletich J.C. Mather Mrs E Mellor Mrs H M. Mi tche 11 o J Prince ^BSF.NT Members J ^nde rson Mrs C. Bell S W Caldwell Mrs. P T Clark S.J. Daurio E Fulton D Jackson Mrs L D Jackson E King D. Lacey V.K r1cCreary J Rupke G.A \oJHliams R F M Yuill The meeting opened w_th '0 Canada', followed by the Invocation offered by the Reverend william Hewton of St Paul's Church L'Amoreaux, Scarborough. _"""~"",,"T"1"'C \.I."&J~'" '" ~ ......., Mayor Gayle Christie welcomed the Authority on behalf of the Borough of York RESPONSE Mrs Gell thanked r1ayor Christie, expressing the Authority's gratitude for the kind hospi~lity extended by the Borough on short notice INTRODUCTIONS The Chairman welcomed the return of Mr Stewart, re-appointed by the Province of Ontario (or a further three-year term, and Mr Gillespie, re-appointed by the Township~ of ^djala and Mono for the year 1982 Mr Don Jackson has been appoi nted by 'l'he Regional Municipality of Durham for the year 1982, replacing Mr Ron .Johnson Dr Reynolds introduced and thanked the guests for their interest in attending this ^nnual Meeting MINUTES -- The Minutes of Meeting 15/81 were presented. Res. U Moved by G.B Sinclair -- Seconded by C F Kline , 'l'II^T the Mi nutes of Meeting t 5/81, <IS presented, be adopted as if read. CARRIED; CII^IHMNI'S RH1^RKS Nil) 26TH ^NNllM, RI' PORT -------~----- Dr. HC'Yllold:; hiqllliqhtcd evcnts of the' past year. adv is ing that the printcd ... ^nnu"l Hc:l'o [" t W011l d be cir.culilted later (19Bl HCpOI-~ to t.he 26th ^nnual Meeting ilPP('lIdcd u!) Schedule "1\" of the-5c Mi nu ten) ,-' -)- A-) B[,flCK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE -Promotion At the requcst of the Chairman, Mrs Edna Gardner informed the mcmbers that shc had recently approached Miracle Mart, and when the Black Creek pioncer village re-opcns for the 1982 season, that store will parcel groccries in "Black Creek pionecr Village - Miracle Mart" shopping bags These will be handcd out to the public at the rate of 2,000,000 weekly MF.MBF'RSHIP List of municipalities, with represcntatives, attachcd as Schedule -B- of these Minutcs APPOINTMENT OF SCRUTINEERS Res 12 Moved by: Mrs N Stoner Seconded by: M.M R Stewart TH^T Messrs K G. Higgs and W A' McLean ~ appointed scrutineers for the election of officers CARRIED; ELECTIONS Mr. W E Jones, Secretary-Treasure~ conducted the 1982 election of officers and Executive Committee VICE-CHflIRMAN THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CO~SERVATION AUTHORITY Mr~. F. Gell was nomina~ed by Mr W.R Herridge Res 13 Moved by C F Klinc --- Seconded by G B. Sinclair THAT nominations for the office of Vice-Chairman of the Authority be closed CARRI ED; MRS. F GELL was declared elected by acclamation CHAIRMAN CONSERVflTION LAND M^NAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD Hr. E.V. Kolb was nominated by Mrs. H.D. Sutter. - Res. 14 Movcd by Mrs. L. Hancey Seconded by Mrs. F. Edna Gardner THAT nominations for the office of Chairman, Conservation Land Managcment Advisory Board be closcd CARRI ED; E.V. KOLB was declared elected by acclamation. VICE-CIIM RM^N CONSERVA1'ION L^ND MANAGEMENT ^DVISORY BOARD Mr. W.G. Barber was nominated by Mrs L. Hancey Res 15 Movcd by S.A. Macpherson Scconded by G B. Sinclair THAT nominntions for thc office of Vice-Chairman, Conservation Land Management hlvisory noard be closed. CARRIED; W G BARBER was declared elccted by acclamation A-4 -4- CH AIRMAN FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION ADVISORY BOARD Mr J S f,cott was nominated by Mr W R. Herridge Res 16 Moved by W G McLean Seconded by C F Kline THAT nominntions for the office of Chairman, Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board be closed CARRI ED; J.S. SCOTT was declared elected by acclamation VICE-CHAIRMAN FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION ADVISORY BOARD Mr W R IIerridge was nominated by Mr J S Scott Res 117 Moved by W M Tove 11 Seconded by S.A Macpherson TIIN), nominations for the office of Vice-Chairman, Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board be closed CARRIED; W R HERRIDGE was declared elected by acclamation CHAIRMAN HISTORICAL SITES ADVISORY BOARD Mr M W II Biggar was nominated by Mr. J.A. Bryson Res 8 ~loved by Mrs F Edna Gardner Seconded b.1 Mrs. N Stoner THAT nominations for the office of Chairman, Historical Sites Advisory Board be closed CARRI ED; M W H BIGGAR was declared elected by acclamation VICE-CHlIIR/1AN HISTORICAL SITES ADVISORY BOARD Mr F R Perkins was nominated by Mr M W H. Biggar Res. 19 Moved by J.A. Bryson Seconded by Mrs ^ Walker T11^T nominations for the office of Vice-Chairman, Historical Sites Advisory Board bc closed CARRIED; F R PERKINS was dcclared clected by acclamation CHAIRMAN INFORMATION & EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD Dr T II Leith was nominated by G B Sinclair Res fIlO Moved by C F. Kline Seconded by Mrs L. lIancey THAT nominations for the office of Chairman, Information and Education Advisory Board be closcd CARRIED; DR. T H LFITH was declared elected by acclamation -5- A-S VICE-CHAIRMI\N INFORMATION & EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD Dr W M. Tovell was nominated by Mr. J S Scott Res HI Moved by Dr T H Leith Seconded by S A Macpherson THAT nominations for the office of Vice-Chairman, Information and Education Advisory Board be closed. CARRIED; DR W ~1 TOVELL was declared elected by acclamation. CH^IRM^N WATERFRONT ADVISORY BOARD Mr M J Breen was nominated by Mr G B Sinclair Res 112 Moved by Mrs F Edna Gardner Seconded by Mrs. L. Hancey THAT nominations for the office of Chairman, Waterfront Advisory Board be closed CARRIED; M J BREEN was declared elected by acclamation VICE-CHAJ RMAN WATERFRONT ADVISORY BO^RD Mr E Fulton was nominated by ~r P E Oyler Res 113 Moved by S A Macpherson Seconded by Mrs. F. Gell TH~T nominations for the offj~e of Vice-Chairman, Waterfront Advisory Board be chlsed CARRIED; EDWARD FULTON was declared elected by acclamation. APPOINTMENT OF WATERSHED ADVISORY BOARDS Res 114 Moved by Mrs. F Gell Seconded by M.W H Biggar THAT the Watershed ^dvisory Boards for 1982 be appointed as follows DON VALLEY (14) Daurio, S ,J Leith, Dr. T H. Smith, M.M , Q C. Griffiths, S T , R.P F Lipton, M D., Q C Sutherland, Mrs B. Hancey, Mrs L Nimmo, Ms. S Sutherland, W Henderson, G Oyler, P.E Tovell, Dr. W M Herridge, W R , Q C Perkins, F R ETOBICOKE-MIMICO (10) Breen, M J Kline, C F Sinclair, G B Cook, D L Lacey, D. Sutter, Mrs. H D Fleet, I) G Macpherson, S A KelJ y, W J McKechnie, F J HUMBER V^LLEY (15) Barber, W G Gardncr, Mrs F Edna McCreary, V K Biggar, M W " Gell, Mrs Florence Rupke, J Bryson, .J A Gillespie, R. Stewart, M M R. Caldwell, S W Jackson, Hrs L D Williams, G A. Fitzpatrick R J Kolb, E V Yuill, R F M. . A-6 -6- R.D II P (12) Anderson, J E Jackson, D. Reynolds, Dr J.K Bell, Mrs C. King, E Scott, J S Clark, Mrs P T. McLean, W G Stoner, Mrs N. Fulton, E. prinsloo, Mrs M Walker, Mrs. A CARRI ED; ELECTION OF CHAIRMEN & VICE-CHAIRMEN OF THE WATERSHED ADVISORY BOARDS The Authority recessed for the election of Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen of the Watershed Advisory Boards. Following recess, the meeting resumed Res US Moved by G.B Sinclair Seconded by E V Kolb TIIAT the following officers of the \Vatershed Advisory Boards be declared duly elected DON VALLEY Chairman Mrs. L. Hancey Vice-Chairman M D Lipton, Q C ETOBICOKE-MIMICO Chairman S A Macpherson Vice-Chairman: D G. Fleet HUMBER VALLFY Chairman Mrs. F Edna Gardner Vice-Chairman R. Fi tzpatrick R.D H P Chairman Mrs Nora Stoncr Vice-Chairman Mrs Maureen prinsloo CARRIED; OF'STRIICTION OF BATJ:,OTS Res. 116 Move1 by W G. McLean Seconded by Dr. W M. Tovell TH^T all used ballots be destroyed. CARRIED; REPORT #17/81 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res 117 Moved by Dr. W M. Tovell Seconded by Mrs. F. Ge 11 THAT Report 817/81 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #l7/81, dated 81 10 14 CARRIED REPORT #l8/81 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Section J, Item 1 1981 Budget Revision -Community Relations - Conservation Education Supervision, Operations & Maintenance - Kortright Res. U8 Moved by Dr. T.H Leith Seconded by Mrs. N Stoner TIIAT Item 1, Section I of Report #18/81 of the Executive Committee be re ce i ved; AND FURTHF.R THAT the 1981 Budget Revision for 'Community Relations - Conservation Education Supervision, Operations & Maintenance - Kortright, as appended as Schedule "A" of the Minutes of Executive Committee Meeting 118/81, be included in the approved 1981 Budget Estimates of the Authority CARRIED; -7- A-7 Section II Res. U9 ~Ioved by Mrs F. Edna Gardner Seconded by S ^ Macpherson T'lIAT Sect ion I I of Report 1I18/8l of the Executive Committee be re ce i ved and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #18/81, dated 81 10 28 CARRIED; REPORT 119/81 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res. 120 Moved by W.R. Herridge, Q.C. Seconded by M.W H Biggar THAT Report #19/81 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutcs of Meeting 119/8l, held 81 11 11 CARRIED; REPORT 120/81 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res 121 Moved by F.R perkins Seconded by Mrs N Stoner TIJAT Report 120/81 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in thc Minutes of Meeting #20/81, held 8l l! 25 CARRI ED; REPORT 121/81 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res 122 Moved by M M Smith, Q C Seconded by Mrs N Stoner THAT Report 12l/81 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the MinLtes of Meeting #21/81, held 8l 12 09 CARRI ED; REPORT #22/81 OF 'rHE EXECUTT.VE COMMITTEE Section I, I tern 1 The Mctropolitun Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation -Mcmbcrship Res #23 Moved by Hrs F. Gel! Seconded by J S. Scott THAT Itcm l, Section 11 of Report 122/81 of the Executive Committee, as set for th herein, be adopted The resignation of Mr. E H Card as a Director and Member of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation be noted with regret; That appreciation be expressed to Mr. Card for his service with the Foundation; And further that the following persons be re-admitted as Members of the Foundation for futhcr three-year periods J 0 Elliott December 5/82 - December 5/85 Mrs R H Farr January 1/82 - January 1/85 Mrs F Gel! February 16/82 - February 16/85 W R Herridge, Q C March 31/82 - March 31/85 P G Masterson February 16/82 - February 16/85 W I. Naughty, C A June 22/82 - June 22/85 Dr W M Tovel1 May 1/82 - May 1/85 T R Webb May 1/82 - May l/8S CARRIED; Section I, Item 2 -Glcnwotson Dcvelopments Inc , Property North side Church Street, east of Union Street, City of I3rampton (Etobicoke Creek Watershed) Res 124 Moved by E.V. Kolb Second cd by Mrs N Stoner THAT Item 2, Section I of Report 122/8l of the Executive Committee, as set forth herein, be adoptcd A-8 -8- THAT the Authority accept a conveyance of approximately 2 1 acres of Flood Plain and Conservation Land, being Part of Lot 6, Concession I, E H S , City of Brampton, from Glenwatson Development Inc , for the nominal consideration of $ 2.00; THAT upon completion of the acquisition, the subject parcel be leased back to Glenwatson Development Inc for a period of 20 years; the tenant to be responsible for payment of all realty taxes and maintenance of the propcrty, and any other conditions deemed appropriate by the Authority's solicitor to satisfactorily protect the Authority's interests; AND FURnlER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, i nclud i ng obtaining of necessary approvals and execution of any documents CARRI ED; Section II Res 125 Moved by W. Sutherland Seconded by C.F. Kline THAT Section II of Report 122/81 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting 122/81, dated 82 01.13. CARRIED; REPORT 123/8l OF TilE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Item 1, Section I Statutory Resolutions for the 26th Annual Meeting of the Authority -Borrowing Resolution Res 1126 Moved by Dr T.H. Leith --- Seconded by Mrs L Hancey THA1 Section I of Report 1123/81 of the Executive Committee be received; ^ND I'URTHER THJlT the following recommendation be adopted (b) Borrowing Resolution - 1982 WHEREAS it is necessary for The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Coriservation Authority (hereinafter called 'the Authority') to borrow up to the sum of FIVE MILLION DOLLARS ($5,000,000 00) required for its purposes until payment to the Authority of any grants and of sums to be paid to the Authority by the participating municipalities designated as such under The Conservation Authorities Act, R S 0 1970, Chapter 78, as amended; BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED 1 THAT the Authority may borrow from The Royal Bank of Canada or the Authority's member municipalities up to the sum of FIVE MILLION DOLLARS ($5,000,000 00) necessary for its purposes on the promissory note or notes of the Authority until payment to the Authority of any grants and of sums to be paid to the Authority by the participating municipalities at such rate of interest as the Minister of Natural Resources approves; 2 THAT the signing officers of the Authority are hereby authorized to execute for and on be hal f of the Authority a promissory note or notes for the sum to be borrowed under paragraph numbered 1 hereof and to affix thereto the Corporate Seal of th e Author ity; 3 THAT the amount borrowed pursuant to this resolution, together with interest thereon at the rate approved by the Minister of Natural Resources, be a charge upon the whole of the monies received or to be received by the Authority by way of grants as and when such monies are received and of su~s received or to be received by the Authority from the participating municipalities as and when such monies are received; -9- A-9 4. TH^T the signing officers of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to apply, in payment of the monies borrowed pursuant to this rcsolution, together with interest thereon at the rate approved by the Minister of Natural Resources, all monies receivcd by the Authority by way of grants or sums receivcd by the Authority from the participating municipalities. C^RRIED: Item 2, Section I Schedule of Meetings 1982-1983 Res. '27 Moved by Mrs N Stoner Secondcd by J.S Scott THAT the Schedule of Meetings for 1982-1983 be returned to the Executive Committee for further consideration: AND FURTHER THAT an amendcd schedule be presented to Meeting #2/82 of the Authority, to be held 1982 03 12 CARRIED: Item 3, Section I Project for Channel Improvements on the East Branch of the Highland Creek, 1982 Res '28 Mo~ed by M.W H Biggar Seconded by Mrs. F Edna Gardner THAT "A Project for Channel Improvements on the East Branch of the Highland Creek", dated 1982, as appended as Schedule "A" of tpe Minutes of Meeting '23/81 of the Executive Cqmmittee, be approved \ CARRIED: Section II ~es. #29 Moved by G B Sinclair Seconded by Mrs H D Sutter THAT Section II of Report #23/81 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #23/81, dated 82 01.27. , CARRIED: NEW BUSINESS Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitors Centre Mrs Gell reported on visits of the committee appointed to make presentations to the member municipalities on the Visitors Centre The committee was well received, helped, in large measure, by the efforts of Authority members serving on the different Councils. The Vice-Chairman expressed appreciation to the Foundation for its support Mr Stephenson, Chairman, MTRCF, stated that the Foundation has undertaken to raise $600,000. for the Visitors Centre, in addition to the general fund-raising campaign The Foundation is wholeheartedly in support of the Centre Mr Higgs reported on the receipt of $2,000 from the Will of the Late W C Davidson, Q C This sum has been placed in the Black Creek pioneer Village Visitors Centre Fund Dr Reynolds advised that, in spite of a great deal of initial encouragement, the ^uthority did not receive a grant of $600,000 of I'lintario funds A meeting is scheduled to take place 1982 02 23 with the Honourable Reuben Baetz, when it is hoped to obtain a financial commitment for 1982 or 1983 ^-lO -10- NEW BUSINESS (Contd.) Mrs Gell remarked, in closing, that during her reccnt visits to Councils of m~mbers municipalitics, it had been a great pleasure to show what the Authority had accomplished in 1981, in spite of financial cut-backs Some fine plans, laid in 1979 and 1980, were brought to fruition, and 1981 was, indeed, a wonderful year for the Authority. Dr. Tovell requested that the Kortright Centre for Conservation "ADVISER" and the 1982 Calendar of Events and Activities be sent out with the Minutes of this meeting ADJOURNMENT On motion, the meeting adjourned at 1981.02 12 l630 J K Reynolds W. E. Jones Chalrman Secretary-Treasurer KC A-II SCHEDULE "A" Annual Report 1981 26th Annual Meeting Friday, February 12th, 1982 The Corpora tion of the Borough of York the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority A-l2 1981 REPORT TO THE 26TH ANNUAL MEETING THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS Ladies and Gentlemen: Por a few minutes, I should like to report to you on this, the flrst anniversary of my appointment as your Chairman and introduce the highlights of the past year which, you will recall, was our twenty-fifth as a Conservation Authority. A more elaborate ^nnual Report, suitably i~lustrated, will be available for our next l1eoting. Speaklng personally, this has been a very full year. ^lthough I came into this job with what I thought was a good deal of knowledge of the Conservation Authorities of Ontario in general and of this one in particular, I soon found that I had a great deal mo~e to learn than I had anticipated. As a result of this and other circumstances, all has not been as smooth sailing as it might have been. Hopefully, more tranquil waters lie ahead. I am indebted to a great many of you who have responded to my several requests for your views on the Authority and its under- tak I nqs ^mong the membership at large, your views have been !~llpport I V0 and your suggestions helpful in developing an insight Into the affairs of the Authority. Such adversely critical (Ollll110nts as you have expressed fall int0 two closely related ( ClI:("!Orlcs. A-13 II The first is that, given the way in which the Authority is structured and with almost all authority delegated to the Executive Committee, many members feel that they are not in a position to know as much about what is going on as they wish to know, or to make as large a contribution as they would like to make, either for their own satisfaction as responsible members or to enable them to fulfill their responsibilities to their constituents. The second concern comes from the members who would like to become more actively lnvolved in the activities of the Authority, including standing for election to the Executive Committee, but who are unable to devote the time these responsibilities demand. These two concerns are, of course, intimately related. But, just as clearly, this is a classic "Catch-22" situation. Currently, the only way to become more intimately involved with the Authority is to become a member of the Executive Committee or more active on one of the Advisory Boards, but few people have adequate time to devote to such time-consuming activities. And they are time-consuming. If you have looked recently at the list of scheduled meetings in the Annual Directory, you will hllve seen clearly what I mean -- and it tells only a fraction of the story. Not only are there meetings of the Executive Committee nearly every two weeks, but there are Advisory Board meetings, Sub- Committee meetings, meetings for the opening of tenders, and a host of othC'rs called on an ad hoc, or as-needed, basis. As a result, those members who have essentially full-time jobs or are self-employed, and this means most of you, have to A-I- III depend on other mechanisms for keeping in touch and for developing a satisfying sense of making an appropriate contribution to the vitally important work of the Authority. The frequently meagre attendance of non-Executive Committee members at meetings of the various Advisory Boards (and I must remind you that each of us is on one or more Advisory Boards) and the small turnout at Authority-sponsored tours and other information sessions, all attest to the problems of finding time in lives already over-crowded with competing demands for attention. I need scarcely point out that, when a member accepts an appointment to the Authority, that member also accepts the responsi- bili tj for representing and keeping informed the government which cppoints him or ~er. Such a member is accepting a commitment of work and a contribution of time, which includes attendance at meetings, tours and special events; as well as preparation and full participation. One mechanism which would be helpful would be to reduce the frequency of Executive Committee meetings and I would strongly favour this, but I doubt that it will happen in the near future. ^s one step in what could be preparation for some eventual move in thnt directlon, as well as an important contribution to more effective mi'lnagement of the Authority, I hope we may see much more authority and responsibility delegated to the staff. This would have t.he important effect of making the Executive Committee much more an "Executive and Policy Committee" and much less a "Management Committee" , which, in practice, it now is. A-IS IV With reduced agendas, we could logically reduce the numbers of meetings. We have a competent staff, appropriately compensated and we ought to recognize this by granting them more authority and responsibility. All these elements must, needless to say, fit together. They are not only intimately associated, they are inter- dependent. If we could increase efficiency and reduce the number of meetings of the Executive Committee, several other benefits would flow. Fewer meetings would mean more thorough staff preparation, fewer agendas, fewer sets of minutes and less haste. There would . \ be more tlme to subject staff papers to greater depth of study, 1 \ review and preparation for meetings. There would also be \ considerable savings in travel expense for members and increased productivity resulting from reduced staff time at meetings. A subsidiary benefit to members could be the provision of higher, more appropriate per diems, especially to members of the Executive Committee, or perhaps an honourarium, which would help to offset personal reductions resulting from fewer meetings. It would also, one could anticipate, create a more attractive situation for members whose time is limited and whose attendance would require them to forego other income. This is not to suggest that one could or should rely on Authority per diems to compensate for foregone income, but the scenario I am sketching would, one might reasonably hope, make fuller participation in the affairs of the Authority less restricted and less essentially altruistic! Quite a few of you have expressed the view that the four Watershed ^dvisory Boards no longer serve a sufficient purpose to A-IE V justify their continuance. I am well aware that their elimination has been proposed, debated and defeated in the past. Yet the case for abolition is obviously still strongly held by many members. On balance, I tend to stand less for abolition than for a review of the mandate of these Boards. If such a review did not yield positive results, such as more acceptable terms of reference, or perhaps alternative structures, abolition could be more appropriately consl.dered. Another option aimed at greater satisfaction on the part of already over-worked people, and one which, in my view, merits lmprovement in any case, is the provision of more and better informa- tion for members about what is going on and, vice versa, better mechanisms for members' views and concerns to be expressed to the Chairman and members of the Executive Committee. Ironically, I believe we do a much better job of communicating with the public .about matters of concern and interest to them than we do in commu- nl.cating among ourselves as members. I come to this conclusion on the basis of very simple deductions: from the public I hear very little complaint and much applause about our activities, but from our members I hear much evidence of concern! The reasons for the latter may well relate, in major part, to the situations I have discussed earlier. Perhaps, even though mechanl.sms exist which would permit greater participation, they cannot be utilized by enough of you. The modifications I have suggested should be helpful. But it may well be that we on the Executive Committee -- and possibly I should include the staff in '\ ~-l7 VI this, too -- should be held accountable for inadequacies in both the extent and the quality of our communications with our members. Frankly, I do not think we can be criticized for the quantity of our communications, but I am not at all sure that the same can be said for their quality. In my opinion, simple but sweeping reductions of the repetitious verbiage of our minutes and staff reports would be a major step ahead. The armful of paper you received in preparation for this meeting attests to the quantity of at least one element of our 1nternal communications. It is nothing short of daunting, unless you are one of those rare persons with time hanging heavily on your hands, or unless you feel that as an Authority member we have a responsib1lity for assuring the welfare of our province's paper- makers: Now, may I address two more concerns for your consideration. The first is my concern about where this Conservation Authority -- indeed, all Conservation Authorities -- are going, or should go, or will be forced by various circumstances to go in the future, both long-term and short-term. I urge you to think deeply upon these questions. We are fortunate, in this Authority, that we started early and then proceeded to both gain and merit great momentum, public support, and outstanding professionalism. Funds were relatively readily available. The need was beyond question. An enormous volume of good, much-needed work was accomplished by hard-working and dedicated members, staff and a veritable army of enthusiastic volunteers. A-IE VII We still have the hard-working and dedicated human resources available, but other factors are changing and we must change with them. The Government of the Province of Ontario, for example, which funds a substantial percentage of the administrative and capital costs of Conservation Authorities, faces vastly greater demands from an increasing number of Authorities, yet the government seems not to be in a position to fund these at anything like the rate at which they are escalating. To a considerable extent and with, I should anticipate, increasing emphasis, the same can be said of our other major partners, the municipalities. As I see it, the inescapable and essential need for sound conservation of natural resources is such that governments at all levels ~ave no ~hoice cut to support well-documented watershed programs. The fieed for both short-term and long-term protection of life and property, and protection and enhancement of the total environment in which we live, is absolutely undeniable for long-term survival and enjoyment of life on this planet. Our other financial supporters are The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation and our gate and services revenues. Both are encountering heavy weather. The Foundation is finding that contributions from industry, charitable foundations and the public at large are harder and harder to come by in the face of reduced funds available for donations and CV0r-increasing competition for them. with the recent commitment to raise $600,000 towards the projected cost of the proposed and much-nC0()0~ visitor Centre at Black Creek pioneer Village, the Poundatlon members have accepted a challenge of major proportions. A-19 VIII Gate receipts and profits from operations, too, have suffered a bit of a beating in 1981. It is obvious that many members of the public have noticeably less disposable income and we are going to have to work hard and innovatively to maintain, as a minimum, "our share". Unless we are prepared to undertake still more reductions in programs -- which is another way of saying cut back services to the public -- we shall have to raise more revenues just to stand still. We cannot go on increasing staff and adding services while income declines in both absolute and relative terms. Incidentally, I am hopeful that before long -- although it may require another year or more -- we shall see a revised Conservation Authorities Act. It is long overdue, for various good reasons, but there is great urgency for its update. Many of the amendments which I hope we shall see included will be helpful to every Authority. The philosophy of much of the present Act and Regulations often seems bent upon creating a mould to force all activity into a regimentation of control at the level of the least common denominator. As a result, substantial disbenefits result to those Authorities least meriting or requiring restraint and control. The attached pages of "Highlights" of our undertakings and aehievements of the past year speak for themselves and I shall not dwell on them except to make reference to what one might call management or administrative matters. Since these tend to be less exciting, certainly less spectacular, than such functional activities as a new building completed, or the building of a new dam, or whatever, they tend to attract less attention. A-21 IX Yet they are important, indeed fundamental, to our effec- tiveness and efficiency. Not a few of them relate directly to personnel concerns and, after all (to steal and adapt the motto of the well-known Canadian steel-maker, DOF ASCO) , "Our product is public service; our strength is people". In the area of management and administration, several major advances have been made and more are "in the works". As you know, this is an area of responsibility which has been of particular concern to me during the past year and, judging from views which many of you have expressed to me, you share these concerns. In the personnel sphere, the most important undertaking has been ,the completion of a job assessment and classification system \ which\ now includes al'l current jobs and our entire staff, full-time as well as seasonal and part-time, with ready adaptability to modification and update. It is, to a major degree, the work of a team of three members of staff, who deserve the highest commendation for a difficult and inevitably controversial undertaking so well accomplished that it evoked virtually no controversy: The improvements in administrative activities also include the purchase of new and sophisticated "word processing equipment" and the installation of what is known in the trade as an "MAl Basic Four Computer System". As a result, we have a combination of up-to- date facilities for processing "paper" , accounting, equipment and inventory control, and other functions. Its potentialities are enormous and, at least to me, totally mystifying. It is beyond me how it works and I have no intention of trying to learn, but I am most enthusiastic about the end products. ~-21 X Also of significance has been the development of a new employee house rental policy and a revised policy with respect to use of Authority vehicles. A new purchasing policy, a review and revision of our manual of administration, new marketing strategies, studies of what might be done to improve the efficiency of our telephone services, and an update of our policies with respect to automobiles provided to the Chairman and some members of staff, are all in progress. The concerns I have previously expressed about operational and internal audits have not yet been addressed to the point of conclusions or new procedures. But they are being given some attentior by the~ Executive Committee and staff and I hope that more \ \ definitive action wil~ be taken before long. \ . All these developments either mark or promise major mile- stones in our efforts to upgrade our technical, personnel and administrative capabilities and keep us abreast of the latest practical, technological and administrative developments. Finally, may I venture into the realm of a little personal philosophy which I should like to share with you and which I feel is appropriate for us all, as Canadians, at the present time. It is all too easy to become depressed and pessimistic in times of adversity. It is painfully and distressingly apparent that Canada, as discussed at last week's First Ministers' Conference on the Economy, is not alone in facing not only difficult times, but an adverse economy shared nearly world-wide. And there is no easy answer. Barbara Ward's concept of us all being part of a global village was never more appropriate and timely. A-22 XI When most of the nations of the world face severe economic adversity, Canada is inescapably affected, so is Ontario, so are the regions and municipalities, and, equally inescapably, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation must take its economic lumps. As responsible members of an organization charged with undertakings which impact upon every citizen of our area and its neighbours, we must strive to do more with less. Nothing will be gained by wringing hands and blaming others. We must work harder. We must dwell on today and tomorrow, not yesterday. In last week's issue of The Financial Post there was a very perceptive interview with Peter Gordon, who is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of STELCO, and I should like to quote only one paragr:lph, bec3use its philosophy accords so well with what I believe we all need to keep reminding ourselves. Asked about his own vision of Canada, Mr. Gordon replied: "Every time I go outside this country, and every time I think of how frustrated I am about certain things, I come to the realization that, given a free choice, there's no place I'd rather live. Unless we make a career out of ruining this country -- and I don't think that's possible -- we've still got as bright a future as any in the world. We have reason to be optimistic -- we've got all the energy in the world, all the fresh water in the world. I've got great faith in this country." It is easy to be "up" when times are good; but the mark, of Cjcnul.nc leadership and statesmanship, is to be "up" when times are A-23 XII "down" . This is when real effort, real imagination, real enthu- siasm, real searching for innovation, real leadership really count. Last week I finished reading Claude Bissell's recent book, "The Young Vincent Massey", surely one of the most penetrating and erudite biographical treatises one will ever encounter. Many sections caught my fancy, but one in particular struck me as appropriate to today's remarks. Dr. Bissell recounts that a news- paper writer, reporting upon a speech which Massey had delivered to the Canadian Club of Ottawa, said that Massey "had not much sympathy with those who saw blue ruin, red revolution, and a yellow peril, a sort of Joseph's coat of misery, which he thought was hardly the best kind of flag under which to move towards better things". These are sentiments I urge upon all of you. Surely, "the best kind of flag under which to move to better things" in these difficult days is one of optimism, enthusiasm, innovation, cooperation, and determination. I look forward to the coming year as one in which we can bring all these qualities to bear in the attainment of our common goals in the common good. r:-!/K~bd~'-Y, A-2~ - 1 - FLOOD CONTROL Flooding has been a problem in the Authority's watershed jurisdiction ever since man first began to erect permanent structures on the flood plain and, as the population grew, so did the number of vulnerable structures, such as bridges, industries and houses. Much has been done to rectify problems of earlier development but, even now, older development in many areas remains vulnerable to flooding. The Authority's flood control activities covered a broad range of important protective projects d~ring 1981. At the same time, the flood control staff was involved in the preparation of vital studies and planning of projects to be carried out during the next several years. Toward the end of the year, the Environmental Assessment on the Keating Channel was nearing completion and 25 percent of the channel dredging had been carried out. This action is an important improvement to Toronto Harbour operation. In addition to the Keating Channel, remedial measures, in two serious flood damage centres, were addressed in 1981. T~ community of Oak Ridges, in the Town of Richmond Hill, at the headwaters of the Don River, has long been subject to flooding of homes and streets. Channel construction, to carry the 100-year event, together with bridge and culvert construction at a cost of $150,000, were undertaken to relieve the flood threat. Rated as the ^uthority's number 3 priority for protection is the downtown core of Bolton, in the Humber River watershed. Due to costs and environmental concerns, construction of the proposed Bolton Darn has been deferred, A-25 - 2 - and a project adopted and approved to provide the required protection, through channelization and diking, in the flood vulnerable area. Construction will commence in 1982. By year's end, the Oak Ridges Flood Control Channel had been virtually completed and work was concluded on the Bolton Engineering Study, begun earlier in the year. Toward the close of the year, a contract was awarded for updating the Authority's floodline mapping. Preliminary engineering studies for the dam operation and damage centre at Pickering Village were also underway. Completion of the three-year (1979-1981) Interim Water and Related Land Management Project was accomplished. This program lncluded important hydrology and hYQraulic studies and environmental monitoring of Authority projects. On June 19th, the Woodbridge Flood Control Channel was re-named the R. Grant Henderson Floodway, a lasting tribute to one of the Authority's founding members and its Chairman from 1975 to 1981. A commemorative plaque and parkette were established adjacent to the channel, just north of Highway #7, in the Village of Woodbridge, the community in which he lived and which he served well for many years. Staff prepared a number of environmental assessment reports in connection with both erosion control and flood control projects. A-26 - 3 - STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Water planning and management has always been the primary focus of the Authority's mandate to "manage and conserve the renewable natural resources of the region". Sound water management involves the resolution of conflicts r and trade-offs among competing water uses to arrive at the most beneficial course of action for the watershed as a whole. Planning plays a key role in this process. The Watershed Plan, of which Storm Water Management is a part, was developed to direct the Authority's efforts towards achievement of overall water management qoa1s for the region. In 1981, the Authority worked with the Town of Pickering, the Town of Ajax and the Town of Markham on storm water management studies. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Soil erosion is a natural process that may be defined, broadly, as the gradual wearing away of the earth's crust by the principal external dynamic agents of water, wind, gravity and ice. The Authority has carried out protective work to correct erosion problems at a number of sites within those portions of Metropolitan Toronto and the Regions of Durham, Peel and York that lie within the Authority's jurisdiction. In 1981, the program included major remedial works at six Metro locations, as well as two in Durham, two in Peel and two in York. -27 - 4 - WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT AND SHORELINE MANAGEMENT The Waterfront Plan was a document with vision, projecting a return to the lake and to the vast park and recreational opportunities which lay at the doorstep of a bustling, energetic and expanding metropolitan region. Commissioned by the Metropolitan Toronto Planning Board and three years in preparation, the Plan was presented in late 1967, providing the basis for most of the subsequent waterfront development. With the completion of the second five-year project of th~ ten-year Water~ront Development Plan, approval was obtained for a third phase (1982-1986) . During the year, Environmental Assessment approval was received for the Colonel Samuel Bois Smith Waterfront Area, and plans were made to begin construction in 1982. With the paving of roads and parking areas, and the landscaping of public sections, the development of Humber Bay West was substantially complete. Etobicoke, Mimico and Humber College sailing organizations were all actively engaged in development of their respective sites by year's end. At Bluffers Park, Phase 11, installation of site servicing and completion of grading and landscaping had been carried out at the close of the season, and a vehicular bridge had been constructed Landfilling of the island base for the Boating Federation and construction of some 200 additional boat slips were other 1981 accomplishments. A-28 - 5 - At East Point Park, control gates were installed to reduce illegal dumping of garbage in the park area, and site planning for the park was completed. A Master Plan update was prepared for Marie Curtis Park, to ensure that Authority development was consistent with the requirement of Metro Toronto and Etobicoke. Large areas of Authority owned lands along the waterfront, at Ajax, were graded and cultivated in preparation for seeding. Water quality sampling, fish netting and diving surveys were part of the important work done in connection with the 1981 Environmental Monitoring Program. Shoreline Management In the next few decades, a large number of homes and a substantial amount of shoreline property will be lost. In spite of the potential hazard of high lake levels, combined with strong winds and high waves, which have periodically eroded shoreline properties, flooded homes, or damaged structures throughout the history of the Toronto area, development pressures and the desire to live near the lake have resulted in many homes being located in areas vulnerable to erosion and flooding. In 1981, shoreline management activity saw the fir~t phas~ \ ~ of construction at the Guild Inn, and construction of additional protection along Kingsbury, Crescentwood and Springbank Avenues, in Scarborough. A two-year project (1982-1983), for continuation of the Authority's role in shoreline management, received approval from the Authority and member municipalities. A-29 - 6 - LAND ACQUISITION From the time of its establishment, in 1957, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has developed and implemented a comprehensive plan for acquisition of flood plain and conservation lands within the main valleys under its jurisdiction. More recently, with the inception of the Watershed Plan, and as a result of flooding and erosion problems during the early 1970's, the Authority has initiated hazard and conservation land acquisition along the waterfront. During 1981, land owned by the Authority reached 27,190 acres (11,000 hectares). CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT Under the program for management of the Authority's lands, 60,000 reforestation trees were planted at Glen Haffy and Claremont Forest and Wildlife Areas in 1981. In addition, 14,000 shrubs and 145 farm trees were planted by the Conservation Services Section at Boyd Conservation Area, Glen Haffy Forest and Wildlife Area, Thackeray Landfill Site, Claireville Conservation Area and Glen Major Resource Management Tract. Approximately 500 shrubs and 85 deciduous trees were planted at Stouffville Reservoir by the Whitchurch-Stouffville Conservation Club. Landscaping projects were completed at a number of Authority properties which involved the planting of more than 3,000 shrubs and several hundred caliper trees. Twenty-five hundred shrubs and trees were planted in a stream improvement project at the Nashville Resource Management Tract. A-30 - 7 - Woodlot management programs, at five Conservation Areas, yielded about 379 cubic metres of firewood and 934 board feet of sawlogs. A program of patrolling and fireguard maintenance has been implemented on Authority Resource Management Tracts. Posting programs and fencing projects were carried out in several areas. Twenty-six landowners received assistance in planting 93,000 seedling trees, and 4,770 farm trees and 9,300 shrubs were planted on private properties within the watershed. Authority staff made ninety-one site visits, to assist landowners with pond construction, . , stream improvement and planting. Construction of the new nursery workshop was completed during the year. The Flood Control Section was supplied with 7,300 , , shrubs and 835 farm trees, while 600 farm trees and 395 shrubs went to the Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority. Seven private tree spade rentals were carried out, and the Authority tree spade has ~repafed some 1,600 caliper trees for landscape projects in i982~ The member municipalities have received Authority assistance with resource management projects in urban areas. About jl,250 reforestation seedlings, 7,884 wildlife shrubs and 457 farm trees have been planted for the communities of Caledon, Brampton and Vaughan. WATERSHED RECREATION The Authority's Conservation Areas are a part of the total recreation area system of the Province. Their importance takes on new meaning with the realization that they fill a very real gap between municipal facilities and those provided by the Province. -31 - 8 - Much effort has gone into making more and more Winter activities available in Conservation Areas in recent years. During 1981, six Conservation Areas and two Forest and Wildlife Areas were open for recreation. In the Fall of the year, program staff were engaged, and trail maintenance and signing were carried out. An open house was held at Albion Hills, in December, to promote the cross- country ski program. Albion Hills and Bruce's Mill cross-country ski programs achieved near-capacity attendance during the 1980-81 Winter season. Some 3,000 students took part in the instructional program at Albion Hills, while more than 1,500 were enrolled at Bruce's Mill. Special activities, during the winter, included the Beehive Ski Tour and Telemark Madness at Albion Hills, Skifari at Bruce's Mill, a two-day invitational Sled Dog Race at Claireville, Sled Dog Races at Cold Creek and monthly Labrador Retriever Trials at Cold Creek and Claireville, both winter and Fall. While school attendance at the annual Bruce's Mill maple syrup demonstration was down slightly, general public attendance between mid-March and mid-April rose by more than 1,500. Seven Conservation Areas and six Forest and Wildlife Areas were in operation, during Spring, Summer and Fall. Prior to the opening of the fishing season in late April, the Glen Haffy fish hatchery stocked Glen Haffy, Heart Lake, Albion Hills and Bruce's Mill with rainbow trout. Early in the year, the hatchery received 45,000 rainbow trout fry for future stocking. A-32 - 9 - Thirty-two reserved groups participated in the Claireville canoe rental and instruction program, and 11 public canoeing courses were run. Successful programs were operated at Claireville by the Ontario Water Ski Association and by Windsurfing Toronto. All Authority swimming areas, except for Greenwood, were in use by mid-June (Greenwood became active in July), and the campgrounds at Indian Line and at Albion Hills experienced successful seasons. Attendance at the former was up substantially, and 20 permits were issued for the seasonal camping program introduced at Albion. Major development projects, in 1981, were concentrated on the Indian Line Campground, where 28 campsites were landscaped. Electrical service was extended to an additional 28 sites, bringing the services site total to 54. At Bruce's Mill, the second phase of the washroom extension to the Pancake Pavilion and redevelopment of the snack bar facilities were completed. An application was submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Culture and Recreation for funds to refit a number of Conservation Areas to provide access for disabled persons. The Federal ridings of York North, York Peel and Brampton-Georgetown approved an application to continue the Canada Community Development Project in 1982. Fifteen additional staff will be hired under the program to assist with Conservation Area projects. A number of special events were held during the year, including "A Day on the Escarpment" at Glen Haffy, featuring the Royal Ontario Museum Mobile Fossil Display, the Izaak Walton Fly Fishermen's Club and the Niagara Escarpment Commission. Boating safety clinics were conducted by the Red Cross at Claireville, A-33 - 10 - during August and, in September, a Husky Dog Show was held at Cold Creek. Two dawn concert performances were given at Heart Lake. Ten Hunter Education Courses were held at Cold Creek, as well as six sponsored Turkey Shoots. Area operations were greatly assisted, during 1981, by the hiring of 33 students under the Ontario Government's Experience '81 Program and by young people engaged with funds from the Federal Government's Canada Community Development Projects Program. HERITAGE CONSERVATION --- - It is Authority policy to recognize heritage resources in t"le region, particularly where historical structures and archaeological si,:es occur on lands acquired by the Authority, as part of its conservation management program. Black Creek Pioneer Village Black Creek Pioneer Village experienced a busy year in 1981, in terms of special events, visitor participation and educational programs, despite a decline in attendance during the Summer. The Winter program at Black Creek showed a slight increase over the 1980 figure, resulting in 264,000 visitors for the year. Plans for a variety of events attractive to visitors are being developed for 1982. The Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitors Centre was adopted as a 25th Anniversary Project by the Authority. Toward the close of the year, presentations were being made to the member munici- palities seeking financial support for construction of the Centre, based on a feasibility study carried out earlier in the year by DeLoitte Haskins & Sells Associates, Management Consultants. A-3. - 11 - A major 104-item collection of tinsmithing equipment was one of the many donations made to the Village during the year. The Citizenship Program attracted more than 400 persons in 198!. As has been the practice, money from this program was turned over to the Black Creek Growth Endowment Fund. Over the years, Black Creek Pioneer Village has been a popular setting for filming movie sequences, television commercials and segments and still photos, and 1981 was no exception. These filming activities help to publicize the Village and generate welcome revenue. Work continued on the restoration of the Sawyer's Home and on the Richmond Hill Manse. A drive shed, which came from the Credit Valley Conservation Authority, was rebuilt by the Village staff, adjacent to the Fisherville Church. Negotiations for acquiring and moving a sawmill, donated by Mr. and Mrs. Robert Nesbitt, were completed during 1981 and, on December 15th, approval was received for a Wintario grant. About $50,000 had been raised by The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation for rebuilding this mill at Black Creek. Among the noteworthy special events during the year was the season-opening "Taste of Maple" program, featuring early Ont.:l r i,a uses of maple syrup. This pre-booked, unguided tour program attracted more than 5,000 students and educators, which is <l]most tW1ce the 1980 number. In excess of 400 children roamed the Vlll.:lge grounds on Sunday, April 19th searching for 90-rf()7Cn co loured eggs, during the First Annual Easter Egg Hunt. -35 - 12 - In June, the new Bishop of Ontario, the Right Reverend Allan A. Read (who is also the Honourary Reeve of Black Creek Pioneer Village) conducted the eighth annual Rogationtide Service, in the Village. In September, he led 400 persons, who braved inclement weather, in the Village's third annual Hymn Sing. Extensive media attention gave a gratifying boost to a new event, Muster Day, on July 1st. It featured uniformed members of the Upper Canada Rifles. Bruce's Mill The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation made $11,000 available for the restoration of the grist mill at Bruce's Mill. Application was made to the Ontario Heritage Foundation for funds to continue the restoration program. Improved drainage has greatly improved the problem of standing water under the mill. During the year, a technical history of the mill was completed. COMMUNITY RELATIONS The goal of the Community Relations Program is to inform and educate the public about the Authority and its resource manage- ment responsibilities. Implementation of the resource management programs developed by the Authority is dependent upon the support and participation of the communities served by the programs. The community Relations Program is based on two major components. conservation information and conservation education. Conservation Information Organlzing and carrying out arrangements for six tours and spccii:ll d<lYs in May and June, plus two more in September and October, A-3E - 13 - helped make for a very busy year for the Information Section. The special events included a "preview day" for Black Creek Pioneer Village, at Sotheby's Auction Rooms; the annual Arbor Day Honour Roll Awards presentation; dedication of the R. Grant Henderson Floodway, in honour of the late Authority Chairman; tour of the Lake St. George Conservation Area and Field Centre by Richmond Hill Council and Commissioners; the Annual Garden Party and service awards presentation at Black Creek Pioneer Village; a Waterfront Tour for members of the Waterfront Advisory Board and Ajax Council and staff; the annual Watershed Tour and Barbecue; and, on October 6th, the official opening of the temporary home of The McMichael Canadian Collection at the Kortright Centre for Conservation. Special functions and activities, related to the Authority's 25th Anniversary, also occupied much staff time during the year. These included arrangements for the 25th Annual Inaugural Meeting and Reception; production of a l6-minute,audio-visual presentation; and coordination of 25th Anniversary identification on all of the , , Authority's printed materials. Although curtailed somewhat by the postal strike, about 100 news and photo releases were issued, reflecting all of the Authority's actlvities. A wide variety of brochures and pamphlets was prepared \ and distributed, promoting Conservation Areas. Sixteen flyers and "- "- posters, a part of the Marketing Program developed in 1980, emphaslzed the attractions for the public at Black Creek Pioneer VIJ.lage, the Kortright Centre for Conservation and the Conservation Areas. An extensive Marketing Survey and Study was also conducted by Woods Gordon Management Consultants. The results of the survey A-37 - 14 - will be invaluable in providing guidance for improving and maintain- ing attendance at the Village, Kortright and the Conservation Areas. Some 15 exhibits were designed and developed for use at exhibitions, shows, shopping malls and stores. These ranged from simple, non-staffed presentations to elaborate, complex, fully-staffed promotions. Conservation Education The Authority's residential fieid centres have been booked to capacity, consistently, for their regular education programs, and 1981 was no exception. Besides the school classes that were enrolled for weekday use of the centres during the school term, special groups swelled attendance figures. These included Girl Guides, church, art, police and teacher groups, university faculty/and farmer organizations. Similarly, the day programs at Cold Creek Conservation Field Centre and at Black Creek Pioneer Village have experienced rising interest, the demand increasing for both academic and camping programs at Cold Creek, and for the Educational Tour and Pioneer Life Programs at the Village. A gradual updating of program content at Black Creek is designed to meet the needs of participating Boards of Education. Summer programs at Albion Hills, Boyd, Claremont and Lake St. George were engaged in by York University Conservation and Environmental student groups, March of Dimes and by secondary school archaeology students. The Kortright Centre for Conservation is coming into its own ClS an lmportant recreation and learning facility. With a wide range of popular proqrams, such as bird banding, baby animals, starting YOlll l.)"rden, stream management and how to photograph flowers and i 'I ::: ( 'c t s , plus unique public attractions like the "Owl Prowl" and A-38 - 15 - "Toboggan Building", the Centre is on target for attendance and running somewhat ahead of projection for revenue. The new Marketing Program has played an important part in the increases. The Kortright Centre is proud to be the temporary home for more than 175 works of art from The McMichael Canadian Collection. The new art gallery is drawing visitors from a previously untouched market. The Centre is also enjoying increased patronage for its banquet and meeting facilities, among business and government organizations seeking a quiet atmosphere, away from urban pressures, for meetings and seminars. Kortright is in the process of acquiring two new coordinators, one tc be in charge of the Energy Theme exhibits and programs, and the otler to b2 responsible for Water Theme activities. THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION FOUNDATION The year 1981 recorded two notable events: 25 years of operation for The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation ^uthority, and the 20th anniversary year of the founding of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation. More than $190,000 was raised by The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation, in 1981, for a variety of conservation purposes. The money raised brought the cumulative amount received by the Foundation, since its inception, to $3,341,893. Despite a decrease of $43,000 in Wintario and other government agency grants, the year was a gratifying one for the organization. Revenue from other sources, primarily individual donations, major gifts by several family foundations and investment income, showed a A-39 - 16 - $17,000 increase over 1980 receipts. The Foundation found itself competing for charitable funds with numerous hospital, university and charitable campaigns, in a period of lower economic stability. An active year resulted in the Foundation raising $47,500 towards its two-thirds share of the $160,000 estimated cost to restore the Nesbitt Sawmill at Black Creek Pioneer Village. A Wintario grant of $53,000 was also approved for the restoration work. tn addition, there was renewed financial support by the Peacock Foundation toward the maintenance of the Peacock Woodlot at Black Creek; additional funds were raised for the Bruce's Mill Restoration Project; and a special large donation was made to the B. Harper Bull Conservation Fellowshl.p Awards Fund. This latter fund now has $20,800 toward the capital objective of $25,000. Income on 1nvestments again provided for three scholarships, of $600 each, to students engaged in cOAservation/enviro~ent related courses. Rising to the challenge of a somber economic outlook for the region, the Foundation voted, at year-end, to take on the responsibility for raising $600,000, over a one to three-year period, if necessary, for construction of the Black Creek Pioneer Village V1sitors Centre. This amount represents a one-third share of the construction cost. The project, viewed by the Foundation as an 1mportant, much-needed improvement to the Village facilities, will be in addition to normal solicitations for restorations and other projects already underway. During 1981, funds were also sought for costs of a feasibility study on the proposed Visitors Centre, as well as for restoration work in progress on the Church Manse, the Sawyer's House and the Taylor Cooperage, at the Village. A-41 - 17 - Special solicitations were made to interested industries, the Ontario Waterfowl Research Foundation and the Canadian National Sportsmen's Fund for support for the Kortright Centre exhibits program. This program was curtailed, in 1981, due to arrangements for accommodation of The McMichael Canadian Collection art exhibit. The Foundation is optimistic that financial support will be forth- coming, in 1982, from the organizations to which it has appealed. With completion of a machinery rebuilding study for Bruce's Mill, it will be possible to prepare strong presentations to prospective donors and government-related agencies. It was with regret that the Foundation accepted the ~esignations of Directors R. T. D. Birchall and Elgin H. Card, both of whom have felt the pressure of other responsibilities. The Board was also saddened by the death of John E. Langdon, a staunch supporter of Black Creek Pioneer Village. A-41 IN APPRECIATION , The Metlr.opo.u.ta.n T Olton:to and Reg,ion COn6eJLva.U.on AuthoJr.Uy htt6 attcLi.ned W 25th AnniveMalty laItgd.y thJr.ough the geneJtoU6 pltOv-iA.ion 06 .tUne, .ta1.ent and money by a gltea.:t many -i.ncUv,idua.t6 and oltga.n..tza.ilon6. YoWL un6.tinti.ng .6UppoJr;t and enc.oWla.gemen.t alte deepty applteua.:ted. It M devoutty hoped :tha..t the .in.teJLut and 6iUth .6hown by .60 many ,in the p46t will be c.o nti.nued 46 we enteJt ,into oWL .6 ec.o nd 25 YeaJL6 06 .6 eJtv-i.c.e. Ac.knowtedge.ment -iA made 06 the .6pec.ia1. 46.6-iAtanc.e pJtov-i.ded by the AuthoJrli:y'.6 .6,ix me.mbeJL mUrUc.,ipa.LU..iell: The Mwuc.,ipa.Wy 06 Metlr.opoWan ToJtonto, The Reg,ional. MurUupa1-Ui..elI 06 VWLham, Peel and Yoltk a.n.d the TOwn.6hip.6 06 AdJal.a and Mona; the GoveJmment 06 Onh.JLio; the GoveJtnment On Canada; The Metlr.opo.t.ita.n Tolton:to and Reg-i.on COn6eJLva..tion Founda..tion; W-i.n.taJL.i..o; and the Sc.hoot BOa.Jr.d6 06 the Jteg-i.on. A-42 SCHEDULE "B" THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEMBERS -- 1982 MUNICIPALITY ADJALA & MONO TOWNSHIPS GILLESPIE, R. THE MUNICIPALITY OF BARBER, W G. METROPOLITAN TORONTO BIGGAR, M W.H. BREEN, M J. FLEET, o G FULTON, E GARDNER, Mrs F E GELL, MRS. F GRIFFITHS, S T , R P F HENDERSON, G HERRIDGE, W R , Q C LACEY, D LEITH, DR. T H. LIPTON, M 0 , Q.C. MACPHERSON, S A. NIMMO, MS S. OYLER, P E PRINSLOO, MRS M. SCOTT, J.S. SINCLAIR, G B. SMITH, M M , Q C. SUTHERLAND, MRS. B SUTHERLAND, W TOVELL, DR. W.M. YUILL, R.F.M. THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM ANDERSON, J CLARK, MRS. P T. JACKSON, 0 McLEAN, W G STONER, MRS. N. THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL COOK, D.L FITZPATRICK, R J KELLY, W.J. KLINE, C F KOLB, E V. McCREARY, V.K. MCKECHNIE, F.J. SUTTER, MRS. H D. THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BELL, MRS. C. BRYSON, J A. DAURIO, S J HANCEY, MRS. L. JACKSON, MRS L.D KING, E PERKINS, F R. RUPKE, J. WALKER, MRS. A WILLIAMS, G.A PROVINCE OF ONTARIO CALDWELL, S W REYNOLDS, DR J.K STEWART, M M R. R.S.O 1970 c 78 s. 13 (1) "Fach member shall hold office until the first meeting of the Authority after the te~m for which he was appointed has expired " ~ A-43 , the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes AUTHORITY ~IEETING 1982 03 12 12/82 Meeting #2/82 of the Authority was held 82 03 12 at the Authority Office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview The meeting was called to order at 0930 hours in Humber Room PRESENT Chairman Dr J K Reynolds Vice-Chairman Mrs F Gel I Members J.E Ande rson M W II Biggar M J Breen J.A Bryson Mrs P T Clark o L Cook R J Fitzpatrick D G Fleet Mrs. F Edna Gardner Robert Gillespie S.T. Griffiths, R P F. Mrs Lois Hancey Gavin Henderson W.R Herridge, Q C Don Jackson W.J Ke lly E.V. Kolb Da vid Lacey Dr. T H Leith M D I,ipton, Q C. S.A Macpherson F J McKechnie W.G McLean Ms S Nimmo F R Perkins G.B. Sincla i r M M Smith, Q C. M.M R Stewart Mrs. Norah Stoner Mrs. Betty Sutherland William Sutherland Mrs H.D Sutter Dr. W.M Tovell Mrs A M Walker R.F.M Yuill ABSENT Members W G. Barbe r Mrs C Bell S W. Caldwell S.J Daurio Edward Fulton Mrs. L 0 Jackson Eldred King C.F Kline V.K McCreary P.E. Oyler Mrs Maureen prinsloo John Rupke J S. Scot t G A Williams A-44 -2- CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS Dr Reynolds introduced Mr Don Jackson, appointed by The Regional Municipality of Durham for the year 1982 to replace Mr Ron Johnson The formal 25th Annual Report is now available and has been circulated to members present today The film NA Town and its River" will be shown at the conclusion of the meeting. MINUTES Res #30 Moved by G.B. Sinclair Seconded by M.M. Smith, Q. C THAT the Minutes of Meeting 11/82 be approved CARRIED, REPORT 11/82 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res #31 Moved by W.R. Herridge, Q.C , Seconded by D.G. Fleet THAT the meeting resolve itself into a Committee of the Whole and meet in camera. CARRIED, Res #32 Moved by W G. McLean Secorded by S.A Macpherson THAT the Committee oi: the Whole rise and the Authority resume in regular session CARRI ED, Res 133 Moved by M.D. Lipton, Q C. Seconded by M.J. Breen THAT The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority desires to express its support and endorsement of the personal integrity and conduct of Michael Biggar as a member of the Authority and the Executive Committee thereof, AND FURTHER THAT a letter to this effect be prepared forthwith under the auspices of the Authority, be executed by the Chairman and the General Manager, and be delivered to Mr Biggar for his use CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, Res 134 Moved by W.R. Herridge, Q.C. Seconded by D.G. Fleet THAT a committee be appointed for the purpose of determining guidelines for Authority members having regard to conflict of interest, AND FURTHER THAT the commit tee compr ise the following Chairman M D Lipton, Q C. Members D G Fleet M M Smith, Q.C. with the assistance of the legal firm Gardiner Roberts. CARRIED, Res #35 Moved by Dr. T.H. Le it h Seconded by R.F.M. Yuill THAT Report #1/82 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting 12/82, held 82.02.17. CARRIED; -3- A-45 REPORT 12/82 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Section I, Item 1 Delegation - Mrs. H D. Sutter -Draft Proposal for Re-organization of Authority Committee System, 1982.02 15 Res #36 Moved by Mrs. H D Sutter Seconded by W R Herridge, Q C. THAT Resolution 120 of Executive Committee Meeting #2/82 not be adopted; THAT a committee be appointed to study the re-organization of the Authority committee system, and that the committee include Mr. G Bruce Sinclair Mrs Dianne Sutter Dr Walter Tovell Mr Gavin Henderson Mrs. Norah Stoner Hr. W.R. Herridge, Q C. Ms Sandy Nimmo Ex officio Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Authority THAT the Chairman of the Authority call the first meeting of the committee as soon as possible; THAT the committee elect a chairman from among its membership at its first mcet;ng; THAT '1r K G Higgs act as secretary to the committee, THAT the written poll be n~vicwcd by the committee and reported on to the Executive Committee, AND FUP'l'HER THAT the committee report to the Executive Committee prior to 1982 09 l5, which will, after discussion with the committee, bring recommendations to the Authority CARRIED, Section I, Item 2 ScheduJe of Mcetings - 1982 -Revised Rcs #37 Moved by Mrs N Stoner Seconded by Mrs L Hancey THAT Recommendation #2 of Section I of Report 12/82 of the Executive Committee, as amcndcd and set forth herein, be adopted SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS - 1982 FEBRUARY FRIDAY FEBRUARY l2 1 00 P M. AUTHORITY TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL Wednesday February l7 10 00 A M. Executive #l MARCH Wednesday March 3 10 00 A M Executive 12 FRIDAY MARCH l2 9 30 A M AUTHORITY #2 (BUDGET) Wcdncsday March l7 10 00 A M Executive 13 A-46 -4- APRIL Wednesday Apr il 7 10:00 A M Executive 14 Friday April 23 9 30 A.M Etobicoke-Mimico 11 Wednesday Apr il 28 10 00 A.M Executive 15 MAY Monday May 3 10 00 A M - Tour R D H.P U 1 00 P M. - Meeting - Thursday May 6 I 30 P M Humber Valley U Monday May lO 1 30 P.M Don Valley U FRIDAY MAY 14 9 30 A.M AUTHORITY #3 Wednesday May 19 10 00 A M Executive 16 Friday May 28 9 00 A M - 1 00 P.M. Etob -Mimico Watersheds Tour JUNE Wednesday June 2 10 00 A M Executive #7 FRIDAY JUNE 11 9:30 A M AUTHORITY #4 Wednesday June l6 lO 00 A M Executive 18 Wednesday June 30 10 00 A M. Executive 19 JULY Wedne!:'day July 14 lO 00 A M Executive IlO AUGUST Wednesday August 18 10 00 A.M Executive Ul SEPTEMBER Wednesday September 8 10 00 A M Executive il2 Wednesday September 29 lO 00 A M. Executive 113 OCTOBER THURSDAY OCTOBER 7 9 30 A M. AUTHORITY *5 (PRELIMINARY BUDGET) Wednesday October 27 lO 00 A.M Executive U4 NOVEMBER Wednesday November lO 10 00 A M Executive Il5 Wednesday November 24 10 00 A.M. Executive 116 DECEMBER Wednesday December 8 10 00 A M. Executive #17 -5- A-47 JANUARY 1983 Wednesday January 12 10 00 A M. Executive liB Wednesday January 26 10 00 A.M Executive 119 FEBRUARY 1983 FRIDAY FEBRUARY 11 9 30 A.M. AUTHORITY TWENTY-SEVENTH ANNUAL Wednesday February l6 10 00 A.M. Executive 11/83 FRIDAY FEBRUARY 25 9 30 A.M. AUTHORITY #2 (BUDGET) ANY ADDITIONAL MEETINGS REQUIRED WILL BE HELD AT THE CALL OF TilE CHAIRMAN CONCERNED CARRIED, section I, Item 3 Appointment of Auditors - 1982 Res #38 Moved by Dr. T.H Leith Seconded by M.M. Smith, Q.C. THAT Recommendation #3 of Section I of Report #2/82 of the Executive Committee, as set forth herein, be ladopted THAT the firm of Clarkson Gordon, Chartered Accountants, be appointed auditors for the ycar 1982 AND FURTHER THAT the Terms of Reference for a Letter of Engagement be as follows 1 Financial Audit a) To perform an annual audit as required under the Conservation Authorities Act such that Clarkson Gordon will be able to issue an opinion on whether the financial statements present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position of the Authority in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted for Conservation Authorities in Ontario, consistently applied b) To perform such examination in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards such that a proper evaluation be madc of internal controls to determine their reliability c) To perform an examination such that the audit of evidence related to assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, placing appropriate reliance on internal controls, will lead to the cxpression of a viable audit opinion as detailed in a) above. d) To seek, in the course of the other examinations, a reasonable assurance that material errors or irregularities have not occurred, or, if they have occurred, to report to the appropriate level of management, such that they are either corrected or properly accounted for in financial statements e) The audit shall consist of an interim audit (mid-year) and a financial audit in accordance with an agreed year-end plan. It will be a requircment that the Secretary-Treasurer be consulted prio~ to any change in the partners, manager, or senior assigned to the specific audit (it will also be expected that major efforts will be made to avoid significant changes in the staff assigned to the audit from year to year) A-48 -6- f) The responsibilities of the auditors will generally be limited to the expression of an opinion on the financial statements, and discussions with respect to presentation and disclosure, and not generally include accounting work, physical preparation of financial statements or schedules, or any other non-audit responsibilities. Should these be required, they will be discussed separately from the formal audit of the Authority's activities. 2. Systems and Procedures Review An annual Systems and Procedures Review in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards shall be undertaken by the auditors, with completion by August 15th of each year, and findings of this Review discussed with the appropriate staff of the Authority by September 15th The purpose of a review of Systems and Procedures before the commence- ment of the annual audit is to identify conditions which might Qther- wise not be reported until after the audit is completed. 3 Qualified Statements The auditors shall, immediately upon discovery of information or con- ditions which would otherwise lead to the inclusion of a statement of qualification with respect to the Authority's financial statements, confirm and fully discuss such matters with the Secretary-Treasurer. In addition, the auditors shall, as far as possible, allow a reasonable period of time for the Secretary-Treasurer to make an investigation, analysis, repo~t, and take such corrective action so as to avoid the inclusion of s~ch qualifi~ation 4. Delivery of Annual Financial Statements Audited annual financial statements shall be del,ivered to the ",..tention of the Secretary-Trcasurer of the Authority as appropriate by the dead- lines set out in the annual schedule. The auditors will attend such meetings as are called to discuss the annual statements and shall provide such information as requested which will enhance the understanding of the Authority staff, Chairman, and Executive Committee and Authority Members of all matters pertaining to thesc statements 5 Post-Audit "ManagementN Letter No later than 30 days following delivery of the annual statements, the auditors shall prepare and deliver to the Secretary-Treasurer of the Authority a letter or letters conveying the concerns relative to the internal accounting and operating controls and/or other matters of material importance with respect to their operations which may have bcen discovered in the course of the audit Thc auditors shall mect with the Executive Committee (or, if and when appointed, the Audit Committee) as called to discuss the contents and the Secretary-Treasurer's comments concerning the post-audit letter, as may be required CARRIED, Section I, Item 4 Appointments to Functional Advisory Boards and Executive Sub-Committees - 1982 Res. ~39 Moved by M.J. Breen Seconded by S.A. Macpherson THAT the list of members recommended for appointment to the Functional Advisory Board and Executive Sub-Committees, as amended and set forth herein, be approved -7- A-49 CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT Chairman Kolb, E V Appointees Bell, R.E. Vice-Ch Barber, W G Gardhouse, G. Members Fitzpatrick, R.J. McDermott, N. Gillespie, R Griffiths, S T , R.P.F. Jackson, D. King, E. Rupke, J FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION Chairman Scott, J S Appointee Martin, L. Vlce-Ch. Herridge, W.R., Q C. Members Daurio, S J Fleet, D.G Kelly, W.G Kline, C.F. McCreary, V K McKechnie, F J. McLean, W.G Prinsloo, Mrs M. Stoner, Mrs N. Sutter, Mrs H D Yu ill, R. F M. HISTORICAL SITES Chairman Biggar, M W H Appointees Bradshaw, J Vice-Ch Perkins, F R McGinnis, J.A. Members Bell, Mrs C Neil, Mrs. E. Bry,son, J.A Russell, Dr L S. Jackson, Mrs L Scott, Dr J W. Stewart, M.M R Sutherland, Mrs B Walker, Mrs A. INFORMATION AND EDUCATION Chairman Leith, Dr. T.H. Appointees Brown, C.G. Vice-Ch Tovell, Dr. W M. Downing, J Members S W Caldwell Dunlop, W J. Cook, D. L. James, Prof R.L. lIancey, Mrs L Nelligan, B E Nimmo, Ms. S Zajac, Mrs. D. Sutherland, W Williams, G WATERFRONT Chairman Breen, M.J Appointee Norton, G F.R. Vice-Ch FUlton, E. Mcmbers Anderson, J Clark, Mrs P Gardner, Mrs J A Henderson, G Lacey, D Lipton, M 0 , Q C Macpherson, S A Oyler, P.E SinClair, G B Smith, M M., Q C. EXECUTIVE SUB-COMMITTEES Matters formcrly dealt with by the Personnel and Finance Sub-Committees will be dealt with by the Executive Committee meeting as a Committee of the Whole. CONSERVATION FARM Chairman E.V. Kolb Members Bell, R.E.* Caldwell , S W. Leith, Dr. T.H Lowe, G.* Redelmeierl, F.M.* Wall, A.A A-50 -8- MARKETING PLAN Chairman Leith, Dr. T.H. Members Biggar, M W.H. Gardner, Mrs. J.A. Kolb, E.V. McLean, W G Nimmo, Ms. S Stewart, M M.R. RECOGNITION Chairman Gardner, Mrs. J A. Members Perkins, F R. Stewart, M M.R. *oenotes appointment by Authority EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AWARD COMMITTEE Chairman Hancey, Mrs. L. CARRIED; Section I, Item 5 1982 Budget Estimates Res. #40 Moved by Mrs. N. Stoner Seconded by W. Sutherland TIIAT the 1982 Budget Estimates, as appended as Schedule n A n of these Minutes, be received, THAT the 1982 General Budget Estimates and 1982 Capital Programme, dated 1982 03 03, be adopted, AND FURTHER THAT the fol1owing action be taken (A) All Current pro;ects included in the 1982 General Budget Estimates be appro led and adt.pted, and (B) l'lIlEREl\S the Cons~rvation Authorities Act provides that, for the carrying out of any p~oject, an Authority shall have the power to determine the portion of total benefit afforded to all municipalities that is afforded to each of them, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority therefore enacts as follows (i) That all member municipalities be designated as benefiting for all General Current Projects included in the 1982 General Current Budget, (ii) The Authority's share of the cost of the General Current Project included in the 1982 General Current Budget, as set forth in the 1982 General Current Budget, shall be raised from all member municipalities as part of the 1982 Annual General Levy, (ii i) The 1982 Annual General levy for Administration, operations and Maintenance Programmes, Conservation and Recreation Land Management, and the current programmes of Water and Related Land Management, be apportioned to the participating municipalities in the proportion that the equalized assessment of the municipality or part bears to the equalized assessment of the whole area under the jurisdiction of the Authority, unless otherwise provided in the Levy, (iv) The appropriate Authority officials be instructed to advise all municipalities pursuant to the Conservation Authorities Act and to levy the said municipalities the amount set forth in the 1982 General Current Levy, (v) The Executive Committee be authorized to reduce the said Budget and Levy, should such action be deemed expedient, (C) The 1982 :apital Works Programme and the 1982 Capital Levy for Projects included therein and dated 1982 03.03, be adopted, and WIIEREAS the Conservation Authorities Act provides that an Authority may, from time to time, determine what monies will be required for Capital expenditure in connection with any projects, and further provides for the method of raising such monies from participating municipalities, -9- A-51 THAT the following action be taken (a) All member municipalities be notified of the amount of such monies they are required to raise in 1982, on the basis set forth in the 1982 Capital Works Programme and Levies for (i) Land Acquisition Project 1982 (ii ) Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Project 1982. (b) The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be levied for ( i ) Highland Creek Erosion Control Project 1982 (i i) Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization Project 1982 (Hi) Shoreline Management portion of Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Project 1982 (iv) Keating Channel Project 1982. (c) The Regional Municipality of Peel be levied for the Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization Project 1982 (d) The Regional Municipality of York be levied for the Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization Project 1982. (e) The Regional Municipality of Durham be levied for the Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization Project 1982 ( f) The appropriate Authority officials be instructed to advise all municipalities pursuant to the Conservation Authorities Act, a nd to levy the said municipalities the amounts set forth in the 1982 Capital Works levies \ D) That the member municipalities be requested to approve the al10cation of levy mo~ies on hand, which have accrued from projects, for the purposes set forth in the 1982 Budget Estimates CARRIED, Section II Res #4l Moved by Mrs. H.D Sutter Seconded by M M Smith, Q C THAT Section II of Report #2/82 of the Executive Committee be re ce i ved and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #2/82, dated 82 03 03 CARRIED, NEW BUSINESS Information Presentations Rcs #42 Moved by M M R. Stewart Seconded by Mrs. L. Hancey THAT at least ten minutes of each Authority meeting be devoted to an Authority information presentation; AND FURTHER THAT such presentations be so prepared that they may be of further usc at Council and other meetings CARRIED; Recognition Awards Mrs Gardner reminded members that the Authority celebrates Arbor Day, each year, by recognisi Ig those, prcviously connectcd with the Authority, who have served the Authori ty in some particularly advantageous way A tree is planted in the arboretum in the vicinity of the Administration building in the name of each person so honoured, and each also receives an illuminated scroll and a Lifetime Pass to the Conservation Areas. Nomination forms will shortly be circulated, and it is hopcd that all members will participate in th is important activity. A-52 -10- Flood Warning and Forecasting System The Chairman called upon Mr Craig Mather, Administrator, Water Resource Division, for his comment on possible flooding during spring run-off. Mr. Mather advised that municipalities have been alerted to impending mild weather and rainfall which could raise the level of the watercourses. Of main concern would be ice jams, which are impossible to predict Some critical areas are the Village of Bolton, the Lower Humber River, and the Keating Channel. NSugaring Off" Mr. Herridge requested that consideration be given to holding a "Sugaring OffN day for Members this year. ADJOURNMENT On motion, the meeting adjourned 82.03 12 1300 J.K Reynolds W.E. Jones CTiiiI rma n Secretary-Treasurer KC. ( THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES Authority en n ... March 12, 1982 tij 0 C t"' tt3 = ::- :I> I = U1 W THE METROPOLITAN . TORONTO 8 REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES MUNICIPAL LEVY $ 31.1 % 5,561,611 0/0 OPERATION e. MAINTENANCE $ 31.2 % 5,585,989 HISTORICAL SITES $1 930000 10.8% CONSERVATI I 076000 61 % SOURCES OF FUNDING ALLOCATION OF FUNDS THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES I N 0 E X Pagels) Pagels) BUDGET REPORT & PROVINCIAL FUNDING I-1-8 Erosion Control - York - Program Description V-10 MUNICIPAL LEVIES AND BASIS OF APPORTIONMENT II-1-3 - Program Budget Summary V-ll Erosion Control - Durham BUDGET SUMMARY III-1-4 - Program Description V-12 - Program Budget Summary V-13 THE FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION DIVISION Planning & Remedial Measures - Division Description - Goals & Responsibilities IV-l - Program Description V-14 - 1981 Achievements - 1982 priorities IV-2 - Program Budget Summary V-15-16 - Division Budget Summary IV-3 Maintenance - Small Dams, Channels, Erosion - Administration - Program Description IV-4 Control Structures - Program Description V-17 - Program Budget Summary IV-5 - Program Budget Summary V-1B - General Expenses - Program Description IV-6 River Forecasting Operations - Maintenance - Program Budget Summary IV-7 Water Control Structures - Budget Revenue Detail IV-B - Program Description V-19 - Property Acquisition - Maintenance & - Program Budget Summary V-20 Management - Program Description IV-9 - Waterfront - Division Budget Summary V-2l - Program Budget Summary IV-1O Adm1n1stration - Program Description V-22 - Vehicle & Equipment Purchases - New & - Program Budget Summary V-23 Replacement - Program Description IV-ll Shoreline Management - Program Description V-24 - Program Budget Summary IV-12 - Program Budget Summary V-25 Lake Ontario Waterfront Development THE WATER RESOURCE DIVISION - Program Description V-26 - Division Description - Goals & Responsibilities V-l - Program Budget Summary V-27 - 1981 Achievements - 1982 Priorities V-2 - Flood Control - Division Budget Summary V-3 THE CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT DIVISION ~atUn - Program Description V-4 - Divis10n Description - Goals & Responsibilities VI-l - Program Budget Summary V-5 - 19B1 Achievements - 19B2 Priorities VI-2 Erosion Control - Metropolitan Toronto - Division Budget Summary VI-3 - Program Description V-6 - Program Administration - Program Description VI-4 - Program Budget Summary ~7 - Program Budget Summary VI-5 Erosion Control - Peel - Watershed Recreation - Planning - Program Description ~B - Program Description VI-6 - Program Budget Summary ~9 - Program Budget Summary VI-7 - 2 Pages (s) Page (s) THE CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT DIVISION contd - Program Administration - Program Description VII-4 - Watershed Recreation - Development I _ Program Budget Summary VII - 5 - ?rogram Description VI-8 - Community Relations - Information - Program Budget Summary VI-9 General - Program Descript10n VII-6 Operations and Maintenance - Program Budget Summary VII-7 - Program Description VI-1O Resource Management Programs - Program Description VII-8 - Program Budget Summary VI-ll - Program Budget Summary VII-9 Program Budget Revenue Detail VI-12 PlannJng/Marketing Analysis - Program Description VII -10 - Conservation Land Management - Program Budget Summary VII-ll - Program Description, Land - Community Relations - Conservation Education Management VI-13 Supervis1on, Operations & Ma1ntenance - Program Budget Summary, Land - Program Description VII -12 Management VI-14 - Program Budget Summary VII-13 - Program Description, Kortright - Program Description VII-14 Conservation Planning VI-15 - Program Budget Summary VII-15 Development - Program Description VII -16 - Program Budget Summary, - Program Budget Summary VII -1 7 Conservation Planning VI-16 THE HISTORICAL SITES DIVISION - Program Description, Glen - nivision Description - Goals & Responsibilities VI II-I Haffy Fish Rearing VI-17 - 1981 Achievements - 1982 priorities VIII-2 - Program Budget Summary, Glen - Division Budget Summary VIII-3 Haffy Fish Rearing VI-18 - Heritage - Administration - Program Description VIII-4 - Program Description, Non-Revenue - Program Budget Summary VIII-5 Operations & Maintenance - Black Creek Properties VI-19 Pioneer Village - Program Description VI II - 6 - Program Budget Summary, Non-Revenue - Program Budget Summary VII I-7 Properties VI-20 Education Program - Program Description VII I - 8 THE INFORMATION AND EDUCATION DIVISION - Program Budget Summary VIII-9 - Division Description - Goals & Responsibilities Capital Development- Program Description VIII-1O VII -1 - Program Budget Summary VIII-ll - 1981 Achievements - 1982 Priorities VII-2 - Division Budget Summary VII - 3 Page I-l 1982 BUDGET EDIIMATES Authority Purpose, Achievements and Obiectives The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has- adopted a program designed to further the conservation, restoration, development and management of the natur?~ r~sources of the 3467 square kilometres included in the Authority's area of jurisdiction The Authority has identified the region's river valleys, the Lake Ontario shoreline and the headwaters of the Oak Ridges inter lobate moraine and the Niagara Escarpment as the major resources to which its programs are applied Each Conservation Authority in Ontario has been directed by the Province of Ontario to "study and investigate the watershed and prepare and file with its member municipalities and the Minister of Natural Resources, a Watershed Plan" The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority adopted a Watershed Plan on December 5, 1980 The Plan has been filed with, and concurred in, by the member municipalities and the Regional Director, Central Region, Ministry of Natural Resources The Watershed Plan is comprised of ten (10) interrelated programs Flood Control proqram - Provision for protection of human life and property from the hazards of flooding and erosion is a basic requirement This program provides for remedial measures, land acquisition, and application of regulatory measures, to leave flood plains unobstructed to pass flood flows Three programs complementary to the Flood Control Program recognize the relationships between urban drainage, erosion and sedimentation, and flooding Erosion and Sediment Control proqram - The Erosion and Sediment Control Program is aimed at protecting life and property through corrective works as well as preventing future hazards through development control Storm Water Manaqement Program - The Storm Water Management Program details co-operative action between the Authority and its member municipalities on water management problems and preparation of master drainage plans. Conservation Land Manaqement Program - The Conservation Land Management Program promotes conservation on private and public lands by providing for reforestation, habitat improvements, stream improvements and a conservation land planning service. Land Acquisition Proqram - To ensure proper conservation land management, the Land Acquisition Program provides for acquisition of flood plain and valley lands, waterfront lands and environmentally significant lands. The Authority has acquired 26,600 acres of land that are being managed to achieve the objectives set forth in the Watershed Plan. Page I-2 Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program - This program has two components, Shoreline Management to reduce the haz~cds of flooding and erosion at the lake/land interface, and Development to create water oriented re~eation opportunities Watershed Retreation Program - A valuable ancillary use of conservation lands is the development of recreation areas for public use and enjoyment The Watershed Recreation Program is designed to meet this need. Heritage Conservation Program - The Heritage Conservation Program recognizes the special contribution that an his~orical perspective gives to the understanding of resource management Community Relations Program - All of the efforts of the Authority in its conservation programs are dependent upon commun~ty understanding and acceptance The Community Relations Program establishes the means by which the Authority can communicate with the community The 1982 Budget Estimates have been prepared on the basis of programs included in the Watershed PIan. As such, the Budget reflects a strong orientation to Water and Related Land Management Programs, with an emphasis on planning, regulatory and environmentally acceptable solutions to water management problems The Budget proposals also address a number of administrative matters which pertain to program delivery, including: _ allocation of municipal levies on hand, for Conservation Ar~a development and major maintenance _ Provincial initiatives in funding restraint The impact of the measures proposed in this Budget will be to proceed at a slower pace than anticipated in meeting "Watershed Plan" objectives, while maintaining quality of performance The funding for all of the Authority's multi-year projects terminated in 1981 The funding for 1982 development work will be based on projects adopted by the Authority in 1981, for Land Acquisition, Erosion Control, Waterfront Development and Flood Control Remedial Measures All the funding approvals for these projects are in hand. Provincial technical approval for land acquisition, Metro Erosion Control, and Highland Creek Erosion Control had not been received as of 1982 02 22 Format of Presentation The 1982 Budget Estimates are based on the same program management fo~mat as the 1981 budget format. The format is designed to identify more clearly the ten programs adopted by the Authority in its Watershed Plan In addition, the budget estimates are organized into management units more clearly to identify and manage the Authority programs. The principles of program budget management have been used to develop the 19B2 Budget Estimates. Page 1-3 There are five major types of Provincial grant~ available through the Ministry of Natural Resources to Con[~rvation Authorities 1 Administration 2 Water and Related Land Management 3 Conservation and Recreation Land Management 4 Special Projects and Programs 5 Supplementary Grants (not applicable to MTRCA) Authority Programs 1 Finance and Administration (a) Program Administration (b) General Expense (c) Property Acquisition and Maintenance and Management 2 Water and Related Land.Manaqement - Flood Control (a) Program Administration (b) Erosion and Sediment Control - Metropolitan Toronto - Peel, York and Durham (c) Flood Control - Planning and Remedial Measures _ River forecasting operations, Maintenance Water Control Structures - Maintenance, Small Dams, Channels, Erosion Control Sites 3. Special Projects - Lake Ontario Waterfront Development (a) Program Administration (b) Waterfront Development (c) Shoreline Management Remedial works, and management of works 4. Conservation Land Manaqement (a) Program Administration (b) Watershed Recreation - Planning - Conservation Area Development - Operations and Maintenance (c) Conservation Land Management - Planning - Conservation Management - Conservation Management (Fish Rearing) - Operations and Maintenance Paqe I-4 5 Information and Education (a) Program Administration (b) Community Relations - Information - Ge~eral - Resource Management - Planning, Market Analysis - Conservation Education - Supervision, Operations, Maintenance - SUpervision, Operations, Maintenance (Kortright) (c) Conservation Education Development 6 Historical Sites (a) Program Administration (b) Operations and Maintenance (c) Capital Development Expenditures on administration, operations and maintenance, and current programs comprise the Authority's General Levy on all participating municipalities apportioned on the basis of equalized assessment as supplied by the Province of Ontario Expenditures on capital programs are financed as a Capital Levy on municipalities based on levies designated in specific projects Certain expenditures from special revenues and levy on hand are recommended. Land Acquisition Project, 1982-1984 This project was adopted by the Authority and approved by the municipalities on the basis of a 55% grant and all member municipalities benefiting in proportion to their equalized assessment Due to provincial funding constraints, this project in 1982 will require only $225,000 of municipal levy Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Project, 1982 This project was adopted by the Authority and approved by the municipalities on the basis of a 50% grant and all member municipalities benefiting in the same proportion as that determined for the 1977-1981 project. provincial approval of this project is for 1982 only and includes Shoreline Management. Page 1-5 Projects for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the Regional Municipalities of Peel, York and Durham, 1982-1984 These projects were adopted by the Authority and approved by the municipalities on the basis of a 55% grant and each municipality benefiting for the works carried out in the municipality The annual municipal funding requirement is Metropolitan Toronto $180,000 Peel 13,500 York 9,000 Durham 2,250 $204,750 These projects are budgeted for in 1982 as submitted Project for Channel Improvements - Main Humber River, Village of Bolton and Town of Caledon, 1982-1983 -- All approvals for this project are in hand The municipal share is to be funded by the Province of Ontario. The 1982 Levy The apportionment of the 1982 municipal levy is based on the'discounted'equalized assessment in the Authority, in accordance with information supplied to all Conservation Authorities by the Ministry of Natural Resources In accordance with the policy adopted by the Authority, the Regional Municipalities of Durham, Peel and York will be levied an amount equal to 100% of the 1981 taxes paid by the Authority for revenue producing conservation areas within those municipalities Within Metropolitan Toronto, Authority lands are not subject to taxation. Page I-6 PROVINCIAL FUNDING The Provincial grant structure used in these estimates is based on the following approved percentages - Administration 50% Water and Related Land Management 55% Conservation and Recreation Land Management 50% Waterfront Plan 50% The Authority has received approval for the following level of funding from the Province of Ontario to finance the programs set forth in the 19B2 Budget Estimates. Rate of Grant Total ADMINISTRATION Al to A6 inclusive 50 656 ,7 SO WATER & RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT II (5) Operation & Mtce W/C Structures DM 1.2.3 4 55 121,714 (10) Community Relations 55 31,405 (11) Taxes, Insurance, Rent, Utilities, etc 55 135,740 SUB-TOTAL 2BB,859 Page I-7 Rate of Grant Total CAPITAL Interim Water & Related Land Management Project - Studies & Environmental Assessments 55 162,317 - Water Mgt Regs etc 55 377,102 - Conservation Services 55 127,820 - Community Information 55 5,500 - Floodwarning System 55 30,085 - Headwater Land Acquisition 55 275,000 - Master Plan, Valleyland Acquisition 55 - - Flood Control Channels 55 297,000 - Erosion Control and Bank Stab. 55 250,250 SUB-TOTAL 1,525,074 Community Relations Development 55 68,200 Keating Project 55 137,500 SUB-TOTAL 205,700 TOTAL WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT 2,019,633 CONSERVATION & RECREATION LAND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT III (1) (3) Conservation Areas & Waterfront Areas 50 773,422 Staff Salaries, Expenses, Information & Interpretive Programs (5) (6) Rent, Utilities, Taxes, Insurance SO 36,100 SUB-TOTAL B09,522 Page I-8 Rate of Grant Total CAPITAL Conservation Areas Development 50 7B,500 78,500 TOTAL CONSERVATION & RECREATION LAND MANAGEMENT 888,022 *Lake Ontario Waterfront 50 1,400,000 1,400,000 TOTAL FUNDING 4,964,435 * Special Project ---./ Page II-I THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY BASIS OF .'\PPOR'l'IONHENT - HUNICIPAL LEVY BASED ON THE LATEST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT FIGURES (DISCOUNTED)AVAILABLE TO THE AUTHORITY. Total % of Equalizcd Population Equalized Municipality Assessment Total In Municioalitv Assessment In Authority In Au thority Population Authority l,OOO's of $'s l,OOO's of $'s Adjala Township 132,801 8 10,624 3,756 300 Durham , Regional Municipality of 2,080,407 . 1,600,l83 71,972 57,638 Metropolitan Toronto 67,349,809 100 67,349,808 2,143,493 2,143,493 Mono Township 151,286 5 7,564 4,021 201 Peel, Regional Municipality of 15,162,B14 . 6,488,721 464,491 201,152 York, Regional Municipality of 7,011,303 . 5,999,673 179,011 147,532 91,88B,420 81,456,573 2,866,744 00 2,550,316 ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL MU~ICIPALITIES · Durham, Regional Municipality of Ajax Town 667,227 86 573,B15 24,927 21,437 Pickering Town 997,189 95 947,330 35,B72 34,078 Uxbridge Town 415,991 19 79,03B ll,173 2,123 2,080,407 1,600,183 71,972 57,63B Peel, Regional Municipality of Brampton, City of 4,242,108 63 2,672,52B 140,649 8B,609 Mississauga, City of 9,955,434 33 3,2B5,293 298,045 98,355 Caledon Town 965,272 55 530,900 25,797 14,lBB 15,162,814 6,488,721 464,491 201,152 York, Regional Municipality of Aurora Town 4l6,250 4 16,650 15,792 632 Markham Town 2,759,144 100 2,759,144 73,063 73,063 Richmond Hill Town 1,189,312 99 1,177,419 36,599 36,233 Vaughan Town - 1,572,656 100 1,572,656 25,041 25,041 Whitchurch-Stouffville Town 473,499 43 203,605 13,436 5,777 King Township 600,442 45 270,199 15,080 6,786 7,011,303 5.999.673 179,011 147,532 · As provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources Page II-2 THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 1982 LEVY APPORTIONMENT USING DISCOUNTED EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT General and Capital Levy Waterfront pro;ect excluding Waterfront Discounted Assessment Discounted Assessment Proportionate 95% Metro/Durham Proportionate in Watershed Factor 5% Adjala/Mono/Peel/York Factor Adjala 4,910 0000973652 4,910 .00002942090 Durham Ajax 325,556 Pickering 505,242 Uxbridge 39,031 B69,829 01724869179 B69,829 .01963529832 Metro 41,214,459 .8172B190303 41,214,459 .93036470168 Mono 4,298 00008522925 4,29B .00002575378 Peel Brampton 1,744,171 Mississ- auga 2,183,604 Caledon 31B,792 4,246,567 OB420933924 4,246,567 .02544559194 York Aurora 11,141 Markham 1,823,893 Richmond Hill 785,157 Vaughan 1,179,969 Whit'ch- St'ville 126,929 King 161,542 4,088,631 08107747149 4,08B,631 .02449923338 50,428,694 1 00000000000 50,428,694 1.00000000000 THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Page II-3 APPORTIONMENT OF 1982 LEVIES GENERAL PROJECTS - WATERSHED PLAN PROJECTS - WATERFRONT 1982 GENERAL LEVY W~~SHED PROJECTS SPECIAL WATERFRONT 1981 General & Bef~..:e Tax Total Inc Current from Capital Capital Capital Highland Development Shoreline Tax Adjust Adjustment Tax Adjust Inc. Tax Adjustment All Ben. Ben.Mun. Total Creek Keating etc. Management Adjala 375 375 305 22 22 19 Durham 66,347 40,165 106,512 88,069 3,881 2,250 6,131 12,365 Metro Tor 3,143,693 3,143,693 2,311,803 183,888 180,000 363,888 45,000 112 ,500 585,877 320,271 Mono 328 328 282 19 19 16 Peel 323,913 95,044 418,957 297,086 18,948 13,500 32,448 16,024 York 311,866 26,880 338,746 216,076 18,242 24,750 42,992 15,428 3,846,522 162,089 4,008,611 2,913,621 225,000 220,500 445,500 45,000 112,500 629,729 320,271 450,000 la) NOTES TO LEVY SHEET $1,400,000 As requested and authorized by the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, Clause 1 of Report No 5 of the Metro Executive Committee, headed "Capital Works 1982-1986", adopted by Council February 16, 1982 _ 1. a) $450,000 of capital surplus has been credited to the 1982 waterfront funding, b) the Highland Creek project has been included with Metro being the benefiting municipality for an estimated expenditure in 1982 of $45,000, c) i) Provision has been made for the funding of all deficiencies incurred by deficits in operations, as well as reimbursement to the Ministry of Natural Resources in connection with the 1978, 1979 and 1980 audits, in the amount of $268,000 This will be reflected in the 1981 year-end financial statement. ii) Major maintenance at the various conservation areas in connection with watershed recreation in the amount of $150,000 from capital surplus 2 a) Subject to approval by the participating municipalities, provision has been made for the fundinq of a project for development in connection with watershed recreation at the various conservation areas $330,000 from capital surplus and $120,000 from the sale of Authority owned land, for a total cost of $450,000 b) 25 Year Project, Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitor Centre This project is to be financed as f011owsz- Member Municipalities Special Contribution $600,000 (Adjala 67, Durham 11,461; Metro Toronto 499,586; Mono 61~ Peel 46,594; York 42,231) Wintario .. . .. . 600,000 Metro Toronto & Reqion Conservation Foundation 600,000 $1,800,000 Page ill - 1 LEGEND Current Items - 1111 Capital Items - 00 BUDGET SUMMARY Capital/Current - XX ( 1982 BUDc.F.'1' SOURCES OF FINANCING 1 OJ'll R IT""""" ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES I REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES! REVENUES I EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY I , FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION I . I i Administration 1111 1,313,560 i 1,313,560 I 656,780 656,780 1,130,126 j 217,500 I i i I ! , General Expense 1111 160,000 I 57,500 57,500 .I 210,500 150,000 I I Property Acquisition - I I i Ma1ntenance Management I Flood Control I I Land Acquisition 00 500,000 500,000 275,000 225,000 743,247 , , Waterfront Hazard Land Acquisition 00 200,000 200,000 100,000 200,000 , 100,000 I, Waterfront Open Space Land Acquisition 00 200,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 . Legal Costs i Regulation Enforcement /III 15,000 15,000 8,250 6,750 11 , 000 I Water & Related Taxes 1111 234,000 234,000 128,700 105,300 209,000 Insurance 1111 12,800 12,800 7,040 5,760 7,600 I Conservation & Recreation Taxes 1111 60,000 60,000 30,000 30,000 54,000 I Insurance 1111 12,200 12,200 6,100 6,100 8,145 I Vehicle & Equipment Purchases Ii 242,025 24l(,025 9,100 232,925 ! ; i Page III - 2 BUDGET SUMMARY I 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 AcrUAL ACTIVITY NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ! I EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY I OTHER EXPENDITURES; REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES , i I I WATER RESOURCES - FLOOD CONTROL I I , Program Administration ## 680,640 I ! 680,640 368,852 301,788 10,000 529,791 i I , I i I I I i Erosion - ~Ietro 00 415,000 15,000 I 400,000 220,000 180,000 894,000 : 44,000 I I ! - I I i ErosJ.on - Peel 00 32,000 2,000 30,000 16,500 13,500 102,500 2,500 I Erosion - York 00 21,500 1,500 20,000 11,000 9,000 '27,000 I 2,000 I I I Erosion - Durham 00 5,300 300 5,000 2,750 2,250 28,000 3,000 I I , Flood Control Planning & ! Remedial Works XX 1,096,680 1, 0 96, 680 596, 811 235,673 264,,190 782,000 I Flood Control Maintenancel I i Small Dams & Channels #1 155,000 155,000 85,250 69,750 130,000 I , 1 . .1# 121,000 121,000 66,550 54,450 119,000 I I Flood Contro RJ.ver ForecastJ.ng , I WATER RESOURCES - WATERFRONT I I Waterfront Administration 00 31B, 786 31B, 786 159,393 159,393 240,000 Lake Ontario Waterfront 00 1,440,671 1,440,671 720,335 720,336 , 1,645,000 Shoreline Management 00 640,543 640,543 320,272 320,271 645,000 CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT I Program Administration 1# 644,300 644,300 322,150 322,150 536,300 I I I l Page llL - 3 BUDGET SUMMARY -- 1982 BUDG"'''' SOURCES OF FINANCING , qR' '''11"\ ''''''' ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES I NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES I REVENUES P<PENDITURES GRANT LEVY Watershed Recreation I Planning ## , I 10,000 120,000 i 120,000 60,000 60,000 I I Development ## li27,000 1,000,000 I 465,000 153,500 627,000 78,500 83,500 1 I Operations ## 2,203,700 1,203,700 1,053,700 150,000 1,846,200 975,000 , 44,000 I I I Conservation Land Management ## 329,000 285,000 133,070 151,930 307,000 30,000 INFOR~TION AND EDUCATION Program Administration ## 268,385 268,385 134,192 134,193 222,582 I I Community Relations Information I Support ## 59,990 59,990 29,995 29,995 52,846 I General ## 74,100 74,100 39,905 34,195 57,400 5,500 I Resource Management Programs ## 10,000 10,000 4,500 5,000 planning/Market Analysis ## 125,000 125,000 18,000 107 ,000 60,000 Community Relations Education Support 1# 32,117 32,117 16,059 16,058 28,778 Supervision Operations and Maintenance ## 1,03'7,764 873,800 163,964 65,175 <:\8,789 1,084,946 990,931 - Supervision Operations and Maintenance - Kortright i# 393,000 232,150' 160,850 17,250 95,000 48,600 251,800 153,000 Development ## 180,500 180,500 68,200 55,800 56,500 208,096 J Page ~ _ 4 BUDGET SUMMARY , 1982 BUDGET ~ SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET I ( 1981 ACTUAL ~ .-:7IV -Y , ! J I I "X~:- 'DIT"RcS i REvcNUES I NET I' PRO'JINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES ~ REVE~,UES I' EXPENDITURES REVENUES !- -, v.~ ~ ,EXPENCm.;,,::S, Gi'iAI'iT LEVY I I , t , ! I I II I I I t , I HISTORIC SITES I ! I Ii I I 248, 700 I, I Program ^c~~nistration 1Ii1 , 248,700 170,135 I! I 95,850 151,850 , ! II!! i i I I , Operat~ons and Xaintenance 1,492,000 1,310,100 I 995,500 I /III ! ! 1,040,500, 451,500 I I 249,500 202,000 I I Educational Programs , I 174,450 I 179,700 I (5,250) (5,250) I t' , 00 I , 1,930,000 I 1,930,000 , I Capital Development 1,930,000 30,000 I t I i I I t i i I ! I I I I I I i I i . ! I I I , , ! , , I I II CURRENT 13,607,563 3,530,150 10,077 ,413 2,818,511 3,999,687 3,359,215 II : I j ! I I i <1,257,848 i " I r CAPITAL 4,276,643 18,800 2,lAs,924 2,011,924 I I ! I I' , I i I I , , , 1982 TOTAL 17 ,884,211 3,548,950 14,335,261 /4,964,435 6,011,611 3,359,215 ,14,225,496 */ 3,345,931*, i I ! ! I I 1981 TOTAL 14,225,496 3,345,931 ).0,879,565 4,894,052 5,754,513 231,000 , II I I , I I I I , I I I I I i i I i I i I : , I I ! Jl I I ! I ) I I I I I '-- . * The~e to~als are not exactly as provlded by the detailed forms from the divisions However, they reflect correctl? the 1981 budget as approved. Pag~ .1Y-=-1 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES THE FINANCE ~~D ADMINISTRATION DIVISION To support goals of the Authority, the responsibilities of the Division encompass financial management and monitoring of financial procedures, compilation of budget, multi-year forecast and provision of such financial data and reporting as required. The Division is responsible for acquisitions and management of property, management of Authority legal services, management of Authority's Administration offices and grounds, and provision of administrative services to all divisions of the Authority and management of Authority Personnel Services - Page IV -2 1981 Achievements - a conversion to a Program Budgeting format was undertaken in 1980 and completed in 19B1, resulting in a more readable and comprehensive budget presentation aud reporting - periodic financial reports of Authority expenditures and revenues were stream-lined and made more timely with 13 period reporting instead of 12 - more sophisticated reporting of taxes and insurance on revenue producing properties was undertaken to better manage Ministry of Natural Resources claims accounting - introduction of Phase I of an Employee Dental Plan - introduction of a non-cumulative Sick Leave Benefit system - introduction of a fully-automated and integrated Electronic Data Processing (E.D.P.) System. - completion of the Authority's Job Evaluation and Classification Level System. 1982 Priorities - revision of the Authority's Purchasing Policy - extension of the E.D.P. system to the operating divisions in order to provide fully automated management information systems - completion of updating the Authority's Personnel Policies Manual. Page ~1(._":....;3 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES Q1Yl~12~l_-fJE2ES~_2E~_~~~JEJ2!!2!J2E ------------------- -:::::::::::12~l:~YE~fT:::::::::::: :::~9Y~ff~-9K:Kl~~~fl~~::::: :::12~1-ByP9E!:::::::: '::12~1-Af!2~t~::::::: NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES --g~~:!,--- LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUE ------------------- ------------ --------- ------------ -------- ------- ------------ --------- ----------- ------- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Program Administra- tion 1,313,560 1,313,560 656,780 656,780 1,130,126 General Expenses 217 500 160,000 57,500 57,500 210,500 150,000 Property Acquisi- tion - Maintenance & Management 1,234,000 1,234,000 655,090 578,910 1,233,470 Vehicle & Equipment Purchases 242,025 242,025 9,100 32,9.25 - - ------------------- ---------- -------- ------------ ---------- -------- ----- ------------ -------- -~--- ------- _!2!~~_____________ 3,007,Oes 160,000 :~~~:~~~~-- 1,311,870 ,302,290 32,925 ~~~~~~- '!~~.!.~iQ-- ------'----- ------1-- --------- ------ -------- ------- ----.. .-- :' a;; '" ll..=.. 4 198~ BUDGE~ ESTIMATES DIVISION Flnance and Administratio, ?ROGRJ..~ Administration PURPOS::: To provide the administrative and financial services of the Authority 1932 03JECTIVES - the continuation of general administration ~;.j financial support services for all Authority Programs, as well as salaries and exp~nses for the Chairman and Vice Chairman The salaries of the General Manager, Deputy General Manager, Secretary-Treasurer, Associated Secretarial Staff, Planning Co-ordinator, and the staff of the Finance and Administration Division which includes Land Acquisition, Personnel, Finance and general office administration, are charged to this program. The payment of members' per diem and kilometers and the Authority meeting expenses are included in the budget The cleaning and maintenance of the Administrative headquarters is also funded. :U"1DWG This is a shared program, financed by a grant fro~ the Province of Ontario and the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FI".:"::CIAL COM~ENTS In 1982, as in 1981, employee benefits and Administrators' salaries are charged to each program. ~ increases are provided for on the basis of 12%. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATImIS: - Members Supplies &0 Fringe Salaries Transportatio~ &0 Equipment Salaries Benefits & Expenses Communicatic- Services (Office) Total - 655,772 114,323 104,325 165,000 204,140 70,000 1,313,560 Page lY____ 5 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES ElYl~lQ~l__flE2E~~_2E~_b~~lEl~5!2512E PROGRAM: Administration -------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------1982-BUOGET------------ ---sOURCEs-op-plNANCING---- ------19S1-BUOGET----- -----1981-ACTUALs----- ----------- -------- ------------- ----------r--- ------ ------ ------------ --------- ----------- --------- NET PROVINCIALr"UNICIPAL _____bf!lyl!!______ E~ff~El!2~~ Bf~~.Yf~ f~ff~~l!.YBf~_ __g~~!___ --g~--- 9!~fB_ f~ff~Pl!.Y~~ BfY~.Yf~_ ~~f!:~Pl!.YM~ BfY~2!:~_ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Salaries &55,772 655,772 327,886 3'-7,886 570,676 Fringe Benefits & Separation 114,323 114,323 57,162 57,161 BO,OOO Members' Salaries & Expenses 94,325 94,325 47,162 47,163 B7,450 Transportation & Communication 165,000 165,000 82,500 82,500 13B,600 Services 204,140 204,140 102,0i0 102,070 190,400 Supplies (Office) 62,000 62,000 31,000 31,000 56,000 Equipment (Office) B,OOO B,OOO 4,000 4,000 7,000 Biennial Conference 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 ------------------- ----------- ------- ------------- ---------- ------ -- ----- -- --- TOTAL 1,313,560 1, .313,560 656,,780 656,7BO 1,130,126 ------------------- ----------- -------- ----------- --------- - ----- --------- ___-r- __r- ---- --- Page IV - 6 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Finance and Administration PROGRAM: General Expenses PURPOSE: To provide for a variety of support costs for which no Provincial Grant is available. 1982 OBJECTIVES: - to fund the maintenance of revenue producing properties and other general maintenance. - to fund the public liability insurance on vehicles and equipment - to fund the Authority's share of vehicles and equipment. - to fund taxes and insurance for revenue producing properties. FUNDING: Since no provision for these items is made in the Ministry of Natural Resources grant structure, the funding is entirely from Municipal Levy and Program Revenues consisting of Rental Income. It should be noted that no provision has been made for the contingency of a deficit in 19B1. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents ~ Expenses TOTAL 63,500 60,000 94,000 217,500 ~a':la~ 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Finance and Administration PROGAAM General Exoenses 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES S S $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ . Meetlngs and Functions 26,500 26,500 26,500 22,500 I Vehicles and Equipment Expenses 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Staff & Authority Members Long Ser- vice & Retirement 6,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 Insurance 14,000 14,000 14,000 13,000 Head Office Renovations 10,000 Miscellaneous 6,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 Rental Properties Maintenance 60,000 60,000 60,000 Taxes 94,000 94,000 85,000 Insurance 6,000 6,000 5,000 Rent Income 160,000 (160,000) 150,000 TOTAL 217,500 160,000 57,500 57,500 210.500 150,000 - :-0.9' I~ 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISIm, Finance and Administration Revenue Detail regarding Program at (e) General Expenses I 1982 BUDGET 1981 BUDGET I ESTIMATED , ACTIVITY REVEllOE ACTIVITY REVENUES 19B1 ACTUALS , ! I , Rental Income from Authority- , I owned Real Property 160,000 150,000 , , i I I I , I I , I TOTAL 160,000 150 000 . Paqe IV - 9 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Finance and Administration PROGRAM Property Acquisition - Maintenance and Manaqement PURPOSE: To provide for the funding required for carrying out the purchase of lands under the Interim Water and Land Management Project and under the Waterfront Project To provide for costs associated with taxes on non-revenue producing areas and liability insurance on Authority lands under Water and Related Land Management Programs To provide for costs associated with taxes on non-revenue producing areas and liability insurance on Authority lands and facilities under Conservation and Recreation Land Management Programs To provide for legal costs associated with the Authority's regulation enforcement 1982 OBJECTIVES To acquire lands for the Flood Control Program and Lake Ontario Waterfront Open Space land Administration of taxes and insurance for both Water and Related and Conservation and Recreation. provision for regulation enforcement FUNDING The funding for this program is on a shared basis with 55% and 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded by General Levy on all participating municipalities FINANCIAL COMMENTS: The funding for realty taxes does not make allowances for any market value assessment that may be implemented in 19B2 OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL 900,000 40,000 294,000 1,234,000 ..as.: IV - 10 , 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION 2inance and Administration PROGRAt-t Prooertv Acauisition Maintpnan~P ~ Manaaement 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES 1F1ood Control S S S S S S $ $ $ S lLand Acquisition 500,000 - 500,000 275,000 225,00') 543,725 vaterfront Hazard Land Acquisition 200,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 I 'aterfront Open Space Land Acquisition 200,000 - 200,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 I..eqal Costs Regulation Enforce- ment 15,000 15,000 B,250 6,750 11,000 ~ater and Related traxes 234,000 234,000 12B,700 105,300 209,000 Insurance I 12,800 12,800 7,040 5,760 7,600 ~onservation and Recreation I T'axes 60,000 60,000 30,000 30,000 54,000 nsurance 12,200 12,200 6,100 6,100 B ,145 I I 655 090 578,911) 1,233,470 TOTAL I 1,234 000 1,234,000 Page IV -11 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Finance and Administration PROGRk.'1 Vehicle & Equipment Purchases - New and Replacement ?UROSE To sustain the Authority's Vehicles and Equipment and Food Services Equipment complement at adequate levels to assure economy, efficiency and productivitiy in various programs 1982 OBJECTIVES - To purchase the following equipment Division Vehicle Replacement New Equipment Replacement Equipment Water Resource 10,400 Conservation Land Management 68,600 6,400 118,190 Information & Education 2,700 79,000 9,100 118,190 - - To maintain a reserve for future replacement of Food Service Equipment FUNDING Replacement vehicles and equipment are funded via recoveries (based on use) from operating divisions and includes Provincial grant and Municipal levies as applicable through the Motor Pool Fund New equipment and vehicles are funded from Municipal Levy FINANCIAL COMMENTS: No recovery is available from the Ministry of Natural Resources for Food Service Equipment It is necessary to derive funds for Food Service Equipment from the Authority's Operating Fund. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Vehicles & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL 242,025 242,025 ~ ag .: ll..=...12 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION ~inance and Administration PROGRAM Vehicle & Equipment Purchases - New & Replacement 1982 BUDGET SOURCES O~ ~INANCING 198T BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES S S S S S S S S S S Vehicles - New - Replacement 79,000 79,000 79,000 Equipment - New 9,100 9,100 9,100 - R~placement 118,190 118,190 18,190 Food Services Equipment - Replacement 35,735 35,735 35,735 TOTAL 242,025 242,025 9,100 ~32,925 Page ~ 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES THE WATER RESOURCE DIVISION This Division is responsible for the carrying out of the approved water management policies and programs of the Authority, as they apply to the river systems, and the Lake Ontario Waterfront, including: _ administration of the Flood Control Program, _ administration of the Waterfront Development and Shoreline Management Program, _ administration of the Storm Water Management Program; _ the development and operation of the Flood Warning System, _ technical advice and direction concerning the enforcement of the Authority's fill regulations and development control; _ environmental monitoring and review of flood control and waterfront projects, _ the administration of the Authority's Erosion and Sediment Control Program, _ the coordination of site plans and development with municipalities and Province of Ontario. Page ~ 1981 AChievements - Erosion control remedial works at sites in Metropolitan Toronto and The Regional Municipalities of Peel, York and Durham - Flood control remedial measures implemented at the Humber River at Oak Ridges and engineering studies completed for the Duffins Creek in Pickering, a~ the Humber River at Bolton - Multi-year projects approved for Land Acquisition, Flood Remedial Measures, Lake Ontario Waterfront Development and Erosion Control '- - Class Environmental Assessment submitted for Flood Control and Erosion Control remedial measures. - Environmental Assessment for Keating Channel remedial measures initiated - Environmental Assessment for Samual Bois Smith Waterfront Area approved - Field work for designation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas completed - Development for waterfront areas including roads, parking and landscaping Humber Bay, landfilling surface development Bluffers Park, footbridge Marie Curtis and landscape development Ajax Waterfront 1982 Priorities - Providing funding fur adequate staff to achieve the 1982 ~rogram objectives - Completion of final engineering and first phase of construction for the Bolton flood control works. - Erosion control programs in Metropolitan Toronto, Peel, York and Durham. - Completion of the Environmentally Sensitive Areas study and other environmental work required to meet the objectives of The Environmental Assessment Act for future flood control projects. - Completion of Humber Bay West Phase II - Substantial completion of Bluffers Phase II - Start on construction at Samuel Bois Smith waterfront area - Continuation of development of Marie Curtis Park - Continuation of planning for Aquatic Park - Engineering study and beginning of construction works for Highland Creek Erosion Control Page -Y..:l.. 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 19B1 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUE $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Program 680,640 680,640 368,852 301, 788 10,000 529,791 Administration Erosion Metro 415,000 15,000 400,000 220,000 180,000 894,000 44,000 Erosion Peel 32,000 2,000 30,000 16,500 13,500 102,500 2,500 Erosion York 21,500 1,500 20,000 11,000 9,000 27,000 2,000 Erosion Durham 5,300 300 5,000 2,750 2,250 28,000 3,000 Flood Control 1,096,680 1,096,680 596,817 235,673 , 6 4 , 1 ')C 7B2,000 Planning and Remedial Works Flood Control 155,000 155,000 85,250 69,750 130,000 Maintenance/Small Dams and Channels Flood Control 121,000 121,000 66,550 54,450 119,000 River Forecasting TOTAL 2,527,120 18.800 2,SOtl,320 ,367,719 866,411 ~74,190 2,612.291 51. 500 Page Y-.=L 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM Program Administration PURPOSE To provide administrative, planning, biological and engineering staff necessary for implement~n9 1982 programs 1982 OBJECTIVES Complete the 1982 phases of the Water Resource programs within the funding limits FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents ~ Expenses ~ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 632,775 - - - 47,B65 - - 6 SO, 640 Q Page Y...:L 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM Program Administration 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Salaries 522,370 522,370 281,804 230,566 10,000 411 ,493 Benefits 110,405 110,405 62,648 47,757 95,000 Travel 14,765 14,765 8,120 6,645 23,298 Enforcement l4,600 l4,600 B,030 6,570 Off icer Technical Maps Legal 15,000 15,000 8,250 6,750 7,300 Flood Control Workshop 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,000 TOTAL 680,640 6BO,640 36B,852 301,78B 10,000 529,791 Page ~ 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM Erosion Control - Metropolitan Toronto PURPOSE To minimize the hazards of erosion to life and property within Metropolitan Toronto 1982 OBJECTIVES: - To carry out remedial protection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis - To continue to update and augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the benefiting municipality being the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. FINANCIAL COMMENTS Total cost includes expected revenues of $15,000. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies &. Real Services Financial & Waqes Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 89,385 14 4, 750 - - IBO,B65 - - 4l5,000 Page ~ 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM: Erosion Control - Metro 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Administration 38,000 38,000 20,900 17,100 894,000 44,000 Remedial Works 377 , 000 15,000 362,000 199,100 162,900 , TOTAL 415 00'0 15,000 400,000 220,000 180,000 894.000 44 000 Page ~ 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM Erosion Control - Peel PURPOSE To minimize the hazards of erosion to life and property within the Regional Municipality of Peel. 1982 OBJECTIVES - To carry out remedial protection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis. - To continue to update and augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities. FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the benefiting municipality being the Regional Municipality of Peel. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: Total cost includes expected revenues of $2,000. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Waqes Utilities Equipment Property & Rents ~ Expenses ~ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7,311 12,500 - - 12,lB9 - - 32,000 P ag e :L=.2... 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM: Erosion Control - Peel 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Administration 2,500 2,500 1,375 1,125 102,500 2,500 Remed ia1 t'lorks 29,500 2,000 27,500 15,125 12,375 TOTAL 32.000 2 000 30.000 16.500 13.500 102.500 2.500 . - Revised 1982 01 29 Page ~10 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM: Erosion Control - York PURPOSE To minimize the hazards of erosion to life and property within the Regional Municipality of York. 1982 OBJECTIVES - To carry out remedial protection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis. - To continue to update and augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities. FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the benefiting municipality being the Regional Municipality of York. FINANCIAL COMMENTS Total cost includes expected revenues of $1,500. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents ~ Expenses !2ll!. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4,3B7 6,813 - - 10,300 - - 21,500 P ag e "y"'=-ll 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM Erosion Control - York 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Administration 2,000 2,000 1,100 900 27,000 2,000 Remedial Works 19,5OO 1,500 18,000 9,900 8,100 TOTAL 21 500 1,500 20.000 11,000 9.000 27 000 2.000 Revised 1982 01 29 Page ~2 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM: Erosion Control - Durham PURPOSE To minimize the hazards ot erosion to life and property within the Regional Municipality of Durham. 1982 OBJECTIVES - To carry out remedial protection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis. - To continue to update dud augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities. FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the benefiting municipality being the Regional Municipality of Durham. FINANCIAL COMMENTS Total costs include expected revenues of $300. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies &. Real Services Financial &. Waqes Utilities Equipment Property &. Rents ~ Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,460 1,840 - - 2,000 - - 5,300 Page ~3 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM: Erosion Control - Durham 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Administration 500 500 275 225 2B,000 3,000 Remedial Works 4,800 300 4,500 2,475 2,025 TOTAL 5,300 300 5.000 2.750 2.250 2B.OOO 3.000 Page ..Y..::..J.4 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM Flvod Control Planning and Remedial Measures PURPOSE To undertake a comprehensive program of flood control designed to preven t , eliminate or reduce the risk of hazard to life and property, while cognizant of the natural attributes of the valley system. 1982 OBJECTIVES - To continue to carry out preliminary engineering designs on the Authority's damage centres. - To commence flood control remedial works on the Humber River at Bolton. - To continue to implement flood control remedial measures in the Keating Channel. - To continue to update the Authority' mapping - To assist municipalities in the preparation of Master Drainage Plans for storm water managment. - To commence erosion control measures on the Highland Creek. - To carry out the Sediment Control Program. FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities, with the exception of the Bolton remedial works where funding is to be provided 100% by the Province of Ontario FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSI~ICATrONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Waqes Utilities Equipment Property & Rents ~ Expenses ~ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 40,599 30,000 - - 1,026,OBl - - 1,090,680 P age Y....::.l:. 5 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRA~1 : Flood Control Planning and Remedial Measures ,9HZ BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1.9Hl. BUDGET 1.9Hl. ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Keating Channel 250,000 250,000 137,500 112,500 350,000 Environmental Assessment and Works Bolton Remedial 540,000 540,000 297,000 243,000 Works Environmental 55,000 55,000 30,250 24,750 72,000 Studies Preliminary 54,300 54,300 29,865 24,435 130,000 Eng ineering Flood Plain 42,380 42,380 16,952 4,238 21,190 50,000 Mapping Master Drainage 20,000 20,000 11,000 9,000 10,000 Planning P ag e L.::..-J. 6 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM Flood Control Planninq and Remedial Measures 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Oak Ridges 35,000 35,000 19,250 15,750 150,000 Watershed 20,000 Management Study Highland Creek 100,000 100,000 55,000 45,000 1,096,680 1,096,680 596,817 235,673 ~64,l90 782,000 TOTAL Page L.=...l7 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM Flood Control Maintenance/Small Dams, Channels, Erosion Control Structures PURPOSE Maintaining capital works already in place. 1982 OBJECTIVES Continuation of the Regular Maintenance of the Water Control Structures at a level comparable with 19B1. FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded by the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: Funding has been allocated in order to cover a progressive maintenance program, including non-recurring major maintenance. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents ~ Expenses !2lli $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 36, 55B 24, 942 - - 93,500 - - 155,000 Page ~B 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM: Flood Control Maintenance/Small Dams, Channels, Erosion Control Structures , 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 19B1 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS , , I NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL , ! ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES I $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Small Dams 13,000 13,000 7,150 5,850 16,000 Major Maintenance 60,000 60,000 33,000 27,000 35,000 Flood Control 75,000 75,000 41,250 33,750 74,000 Channels Erosion Channels 7,000 7,000 3,B50 3,150 5,000 TOTAL 155,000 155,000 B5,250 69.750 130.000 P ag e Y-:...l.9 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM: flood Control River Forecastinq Operations/Maintenance Water Control Structures PURPOSE To operate, maintain and improve the Authority's ability to provide the earliest possible warning of a flood threat and to operate its flood control structures. 1982 OBJECTIVES - Upgrade the operational criteria for the Authority's operating dams - Continuation of the Regular Maintenance of the Flood Control Works at a level comparable with 19B1. - Upgrade the data collection and analysis techniques required for advanced flood warning. FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded by the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL COMMENTS Funding has been allocated in order to cover a progressive maintenance program, including non-recurring major maintenance. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Waqes Utilities Equipment Property & Rents ~ Expenses ~ S S S S S S S S 44,B51 49,149 - - 27,000 - - 121,000 P ag e v-=-..3..D 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM Flood Control River Forecasting Operations/Maintenance Water Control Structures I 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Claireville Dam 35,750 35,750 - 19,662 16,OB8 34,000 G. Ross Lord Dam 30,550 30,550 16,802 13,748 27,000 Flood Warning 40,200 40,200 22,110 18,090 25,000 Flood Warning 14,500 14,500 7,975 6,525 33,000 System Equipment/ Modelling TOTAL 121.000 121.000 66,550 54.450 119.000 Page v~ 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Waterfront 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET T9-ar ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL PROGRA/1 EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURE~ REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUE S S S S S S S S S $ Waterfront Administration 318,786 - 318,786 159,393 159,393 240,000 Lake Ontario Waterfront 1,440,671 - 1,440,671 720,335 720,336 1,665,000 Shoreline Management 640,543 - 640,543 320,272 320,271 645,000 - I TOTAL 2,400,000 - 2,400,000 1,2QO,000 ~,200,000 2,550,000 Page Y....::....l.2 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION: Waterfront PROGRAM: Waterfront Administration PURPOSE To provide administrative, planning, biological and engineering staff necessary for implemen tlng Waterfront Projects 1982 OBJECTIVES To proceed with design ~~d construction of waterfront areas and shoreline management projects. To proceed with planning and approval submissions for future waterfront and shoreline management works. FUNDING This is a shared program, 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL COMMENTS~ OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses ~ $ $ $ $ $ $ S $ 309,6B6 - - - 9,100 - - 31B,7B6 Page ~ 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Waterfront PROGRAM: Waterfront Administration 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Salaries 216,340 2lB,340 109,170 l09,170 185,000 Benefits 91,346 9l,346 45,673 45,673 48,000 Travel 9,100 9,100 4,550 4,550 7,000 TOTAL 31B,786 318,786 159,393 )159 393 240.000 P age 'L....:-l. 4 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Waterfront PROGRAM Shoreline Management PURPOSE To continue the program of shoreline management designed to prevent, eliminate or reduce the risk of hazard to life and property, while being cognizant of the natural attributes of the lakefront setting. 1982 OBJECTIVES To construct protection of vulnerable shoreline areas on a priority basis FUNDING: This is a shared program, 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded by the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto as benefiting municipality FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses ~ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ~ 81,000 450,000 5,000 - 104,543 - - 640,543 Page V-25 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION \'Iater ResQurce SECTION l'Iaterfront PROGP.AM Shoreline Management 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS I EXPENDITUREJ REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRAIlT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES Springbank Avenue l50,150 150,150 75,075 75,075 Lakehurst Ct 75,000 75,000 37,500 37,500 Design 75,000 75,000 37,500 37,500 Maintenance 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 South Marine Drive 150,000 150,000 75,000 75,000 Guild Inn 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 Crescentwood 20,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 Kingsbury 50,393 50,393 25,196 25,197 Bluff Drainage 20,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 TOTAL 640,543 640,543 320,271 320,272 645,000 I Page ~26 198 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Waterfront PROGRA."1 Lake Ontario Waterfront Development PURPOSE The purpose of the Waterfront Plan is to create, on the Lake Ontario Shoreline within the area of the Authority's jurisdiction, a handsome waterfront balanced in its land uses which will complement adjacent areas, taking cognizance of existing residential development and making available, wherever possible, features which warrant public use 1982 OBJECTIVES - the completion of Humber Bay West Phase II - the substantial completion of Bluffers Phase II - the initiation of developmcnt of the Bluffers Toplands - the. continuation of development of Marie Curtis Park - the continuation of planning for Aquatic Park - the initiation of construction at thc Samuel Bois Smith Waterfront Area FUNDING ~his is a ghared progrdm, 50% of the funds bein~ available frOM the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the !"]aterfront Capital Levy on all participating municipalities FItl1\NCIl\L CQt4MF.NTS Provincial approval of Waterfront funding is for 1982 only Further submissions to the Government will be required for subsequent vears' funding OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total 201,025 310,000 20,000 * 909,646 - - 1,440,671 *Land Acquisition will be found at Administration - Property Acquisition, Management and Maintenance. ? age :i.::.J.L 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISI011 l-later Resource SECTION ~'laterfront PROGRA~ : Lake OntariO Waterfront Development - Capital 1932 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACiUnLS I I I tlET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL EXPEtlDITURssl REV2nUES ! AC'i"I/I7'! E'CPEtlDITURESI REVEtlUES EXPEtlD['C'URES GRAnT LEVY OTHER EXPEtlDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ I Marie Curtis 50,000 - 50,000 25,000 25,000 200,000 Sam Smith 250,671 - 250,671 l25,335 l25,336 25,000 Humber Bay West 250,000 - 250,000 l25,000 125,000 460,000 Humber Bay East 5,000 - 5,000 2,500 2,500 25,000 Aquatic Park 23,000 - 23,000 11,500 11,500 25,000 I Ashbridges Bay 10,000 - 10,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 Bluffers Toplands 50,000 - 50,000 25,000 25,000 - Blu~ers Phase I 200,000 - 200,000 lOO,OOO 100,000 - Bluffers Phase II 470,000 - 470,000 235,000 235,000 715,000 East Point 5,000 - 5,000 2,500 2,500 75,000 Petticoat Creek lO,OOO - lO,OOO 5,000 5,000 10,000 Ajax 25,000 - 25,000 12,500 l2,500 25,000 Monitoring 72,000 - 72,000 36,000 36,000 75,000 I Predevelopment 20,000 - 20,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 I Property i ~anagement I I I I 11 440.671 I TOTAL - 1 440,671 720 335 720,335 1,665,000 i . Page VI - 1 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES THE CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT DIVISION This Division is responsible for the Watershed Recreation Program which includes the planning, development, operation and maintenance of recreational uses of conservation lands and all related activities including the operations of the Authority's central stores This Division is responsible for the implementation and administration of the Conservation Land Management Program for private landowners and the resource management of lands acquired as part of the Flood Control and Waterfront programs, except those under management agreements with municipalities Page VI-2 1981 Achievements PROGRAM ADMINTSTRATION In addition to the administraticn of the Watershed Recreation and Conservation Land Management programs, the Division undertook aspects of the Ontario Experience '81 and the Canada Community Development Programs CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT 192,000 reforestation trees, 35,000 wildlife shrubs and 12,000 farm trees were planted on private, public and Authority lands for sediment control, water conservation and wildlife habitat improvement 25 hectares of Authority woodlot were managed and stream improvement projects were carried out on the Humber River The construction of the new Conservation Services Workshop was completed The urban lands management program was initiated WATERSHED RECREATION PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Completion of a number of backgrQIDd studies for the Boyd Master Plan, including an Archaeological Survey funded in part by the Ontario Heritage Foundation Completion of the electrical ~ervice installation in Stage I of the expansion at Indian Line Campground as well as the initial construction of a washroom/changeroom building Completion of the washroom and refreshment booth at Bruce's Mill Conservation Area WATERSHED RECREATION OPERATIONS Operated seven Conservation Areas and three Forest & Wildlife Areas providing approximately 1 1 million user days Instructional programs were conducted in cross country skiing and canoeing Operations management plans for Conservation Areas were begun 1982 Priorities CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT Implement Watershed Plan directives for Urban Management and Resource Management Tract activities and improve level of public assistance WATERSHED RECREATION (PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT) Indian Line Campground Expansion Phase I completion. Provide access for disabled persons to Conservation Areas Continue preparation of Boyd Master PIan Implement the 1982 Conservation Area Development Project WATERSHED RECREATION (OPERATIONS) Continue to provide diverse recreation opportunities in Conservation Areas and Forest and Wildlife Areas and to initiate a major maintenance program Page VI-3 19B2 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Conservation Land Management 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUE $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Program 644,300 - 644,300 322,l50 322,150 - 536,300 Administration Watershed Recreation - Planning l20,000 - 120,000 60,000 60,000 - lO,OOO - Development 627,000 - 627,000 78,500 83,500 465,000 l53,500 - Operations 2,203,700 l,OOO,OOO 1,203,700 - 1,053,70( 150,000 1,846,200 975,000 Conservation Land 329,000 44,000 285,000 133,070 151,930 - 271,500 46,500 Management TOTAL 3,924,000 1,044,000 2,880,000 593,720 1 ,67 1.280 615,000 2 B17.500 1,021,500 Page VI - 4 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Management PROGRAM Program Administration PURPOSE: To provide support services, to administer and develop Authority owned conservation lands and to provide a program of conservation land management on public and private lands Administration of the Central Services Workshop 1982 OBJECTIVES Provide adequate staff and services to implement the 1982 programs FUNDING: This is a shared program, 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities FINANCIAL COMMENTS Increases over 1981 reflect salary increases, transfer of section head salary from Conservation Services and the inclusion of all grantable central services costs OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATION: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services . Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents ~ Expenses ~ 600,500 lB,OOO 25,BOO 644,300 / I I I Page VI-5 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Management PROGRAM Program Administration 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES S S S S S S S $ $ $ Salaries and Wages 280,950 - Head Office 270,400 270,400 135,200 135,200 - Central Services 88,000 88,000 44,000 44,000 Travel 21,500 - Head Office 19,100 19,1OO 9,550 9,550 - Central Services 4,200 4,20C 2,100 2,100 Central Services 20,500 20,500 10,250 10,250 7,600 Utilities and Services Benefits 242,100 .242,100 121 ,050 121.050 226,250 TOTAL 644,300 644,300 322,150 3~2, 150 536,300 Page VI-6 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Management PROGRAM Watershed Recreation Program - Planning PURPOSE: To provide long-t~rm and site planning for the development and operation of conservation areas and forest wildlife areas. 1982 OBJECTIVES Complete the Boyd Master Plan and carry out design studies for future facilities at the Claireville Conservation Area and Indian Line Campground FUNDING This is a shared program 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utili ties Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,500 5,500 - - 112,000 - - 120,000 Page ~7 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Management PROGRAM Watershed Recreation - Planning 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Boyd Master PIan 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 lO,OOO Stage II Planning and 20,000 20,000 lO,OOO 10,000 Design Services Boyd l1aster Plan 25,000 25,000 Stage III 50,000 50,000 - TOTAL 120 000 120,000 60,000 60,000 10.000 ':>a;~ VI-(3 - 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Manaqement PROGRA:1 WATERSHED RECREATION - DEVELOPMENT PURPOS:: To develop grounds, facilities and services to provide outdoor recreation opportunities in accordance with the policies and program direction as established in the Watershed Plan 198~ 03JECTIVES - To complete the washroom/changeroom building at the Indian Line Campground and to ~ontinue the site development including layout of additional campsites in Phase II of the extension, road work and campground furniture and the construction of a campground supervisor's residence and public laundry facility; ~ To carry out a refit project in selected areas to provide access for disabled persons to Authori ty facili ties and services; - To initiate the redevelopment of nature trails in a number of Areas and provide appropriate signs and access; - To construct two indoor washroom/shelter complexes, 1 at Heart Lake and the 2nd at Albion Hills; - To construct a new workshop in the Black Creek Conservation Area FUtlD WG This is normally a shared program, 50% of the funding being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities A special 75% grant from the Province of Ontario is available for the access program for disabled persons In addition, $450,000 is available from special revenues which have accrued to the Authority F INA::C !AL COMMENTS OBJEC~:~E CLASSIF!CA7:0NS ~1aterials Salaries Supplies & Real Services ;inancia~ & t-laqes Utilities Eauior:le-~ Prooerty .. ~ents Taxes E:xoenses Total $ $ $ $ $ S- S S- 49,000 113,200 8,100 456,700 627,000 ?a..", ~ 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Management PROGRAM: \vATERSHED RECREATION - DEVELOPMENT 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 AC'I'UALS I I NET PROVINCIAL MUlJICIPAL EXPENDITUREJ REVENUES AC'I'IIJITY EX?ENDITURES REVEnUES EXPEtlDITURES GRAtJT LEVY OTHER EXPENDIT~RES RE'/:: .(;:::S I $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ S I L \vashroom lOO,OOO 100,000 50,aoo 50,000 I L Landscaping 40,500 40,500 20,250 20,250 Nature Trail Redev l5,000 15,000 7,500 7,500 B C Arbour Day 1,500 l,500 750 750 Access-Disabled 20,000 20,000 5,000 :15,000 , I A H Washroom/ Shelter lOO,OOO 100,000 100,000 H L Washroom/ Shelter lOO,OOO lOO,OOO lOO,OOO B C Workshop 40,000 40,00C 40,000 I L Campground 210,000 210,000 210,000 I Super Residence ~ I Site Layout & Roa Pool & Playground I I I I ! 465,000 I i TOTAL , 627,000 627,000 78,500 I 83,500 I ! t'd':l'" Vl - lO 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Consecvation Land Management P ROG RAM Watershed Recreation - Operations and Maintenance PURPOSE To provide funding for the Operations and Maintenance component as identified in the Watershed Plan for providing recreation opportunities on Authority lands 1982 OBJECTIVES - To operate and maintain 7 Conservation Areas and 3 Forest and Wildlife Areas for a projected consumtion of 1.5 million user days - To continue self-supporting visitor services programs to increase the accessibility of recreation opportunities - To improve maintenance levels and visitor safety and to begin a program of major maintenance to buildings, roads and facilties and furnishings - To continue the preparation of operations and maintenance plans as identified in the Watershed Plan FUNDING Program revenues provide approximately 46% of required funding, the balance being a General Levy on all participating municipalitics fINANCIAL COMMENTS 1982 projected revenues increase $25,000 over 1981 No major fee increases are recommended Major maintenance items, essential to renew facilitics and maintain services, to a limit of $150,000, wi 11 be fund ed from levies on hand OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ S $ $ $ $ $ 1,218,750 533,350 - - .:l7l,600 180,000 - 2,203,700 P age --ll...:.. 11 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISIOtl Conservation Land Management PROGRAM Watershed Recreation - Operations and Maintenance I 1932 BUDGET SOURCES OF F INANCltJG 1981 BUDGET 1981 AC:-jALS I I I I tlET I I PIWVlNCIAL MUrllCIPAL EXPENDITUREEI REVE~!UES : ACTIVlTi EXPErJDITURES REVEtlUES EXPEtlDI'l'URES GRAtlT LEVY OTHeR EXPENDITURES REVEtlUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ I $ I I Albion Hills 358,350 195,000 l63,350 130,600 32,750 306,400 190,000 I Boyd 229,500 107,700 12l,800 100,250 2l,550 l78,900 107,700 .Bruce I s Mill 273,750 168,000 105,750 95,350 lO,400 233,900 164,400 ! Claireville 352,850 204,600 148,250 136,300 11,950 307,200 192,300 ! I I ! 'Cold Creek 178,850 73,500 l05,350 98,550 6,800 l55,200 69,500 I Glen Haffy 145,450 33,400 112,050 98,050 14,000 112,600 33,400 I Greenwood 168,900 46,500 122,400 108,700 13,700 137,300 46,500 I !Heart Lake I 194,600 83,100 111,500 92,000 19,500 162,700 83,lOO I /palgrave I 17,400 6,900 10,500 10,500 - l4,900 6,800 , Petticoat Creek I 233,050 81,300 151,750 144,25!l 7,500 223,100 81,300 I General 1 5l,000 11,850 14,000 I - 5l,000 39,150 ! i I i t I I I I I I .. I TOTAL i~,203 700 l,OOO,OOO i ] 20~ 700 11 053 700 150 000 1.846 200 975,000 I ** Funds from Levies on hand Page VI-12 "" 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION ConseLvation Land Management GATE REVENUES PROGRAM REVENUES RETAIL SALES TOTAL I AREA REVENUES - Albion Hills 85,100 96,600 13,300 195,000 Boyd 95,400 6,300 6,000 107,700 Bruce's Mill 91,300 45,200 31,500 168,000 Claireville 53,700 29,900 3,000 86,600 I Indian Line Campground - 114,500 3,500 118,000 Cold Creek I 23,600 17,700 32,200 73,500 Glen Haffy I 24,400 6,lOO 2,900 33,400 I Greenwood i 36,800 9,500 200 46,500 I I Heart Lake 68,800 7,600 6,700 83,100 I Palgrave 6,900 - - 6,900 I Petticoat Creek 50,500 27,300 3,500 Bl,300 I ! I I I I I I TOTAL I 536,500 360,700 102,800 1,000,000 . <'a.s'" VI-13 - 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Management PROGRAM CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT - LAND MANAGEMENT PURPOSE To provide technical assistance to private landowners to promote sound land management programs To carry out resource management programs for Authority lands for water conservation, sediment control and f1sh and wildlife habitat improvement 1932 OBJECTIV::S Continue to provide programs of reforestation, farm tree and shrub plantings, strea~ improvement and woodlot management to private and public landowners Continue resource management programs on Authority lands Expand resource management programs into urban areas of the Authority watershed FUtlD IrJG The Conservation Land Management Program is funded 55% Provincial Grants and 45% Municipal Levy for water and related programs F HlANC IAL COM ,!:'::ITS OBJECTIVE CLA53!fICATIONS '1aterials Sala~les :;u~iJlies .;. Real Services <' i:1an:::: 1,L & :l?'(les ;Jtilittes EC_l::>::lent Prooerty & ::lent:; Taxes Exoens!:s Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 109,650 40,350 21,150 15,250 186,400 Page ~ 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES D~ '/ISIOtl Conservation Land ~anaae~e~t ?"C0G?..A v CONSERVATION LAND HANAGE1'lCNT - LAND MANAGEMENT I 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FItJANCWG 1981 BUDGET ':'981 ACTUALS tJET PROVINCIAL MU:nCIPAL EhPENDITURESI REVENUES .~C':'IVITY , EY?:: WITURES REVEtJUES EhPEtlDITURES GRAtlT LEVY OTnER EX?::: DITURES REV~LES I ~ $ $ $ $ $ $ ~ $ Plant Propogation 40,000 30,000 10,000 5,500 4,500 Reforestat~on 22,700 2,000 20,700 11,385 9,3l5 I Urban Management 31,400 31,400 17,270 14,130 Farm Tree & Shrub l7,900 lO,OOO 7,900 4,345 3,555 I Resource Management 2l,400 21,400 11,770 9,630 I Forest Hanagement I 27,000 27,000 14,850 12,150 Stream Improvement 26,000 2,000 24,000 13,200 10,800 I I I i I ':''J'!'A.~ I l86,40C 44,000 I 142,400 78,320 64,080 , I ?ac;;e VI-iS - , 1982 JUDGET ESTIMJ..TES DIVISIJ.l Const-~vation La"1c ~anacer.lent p ~C~?_-. I.! CO);SERV.:\TION LP_r-JD Kl\.-J "\Gr: :EJT - CO:-JSERV.l\TIOi-J PLlLl\NING PU??CS:: To provide tec'1nical advice to private landowners to promote sound land management prograr..s Carry our resource managemer.t planning activities for Authority lands and technical advice to agencies ~anaging Au~horitY lands in urban areas 1932 03J::C':'1 '::5 Continue to provide technical advice for reforestation, farm tree and shrub plantings, woodlot management, pond management and strea~ improvement to private and public lancowners :~'~J:"G The Conservation Plann~ng program is funded 55% by provincial Grants and 45% Municipal Levy F:"..-...:!.;i:., CO'-. :::. ':'5 C3J::::IJ:; CLA531~1Cn':'1O~5 ",1 a ~ ~ =- i a 1 s Salaries Su::::_ies & :teal Se~vices Financial " ',laqes U~___:.ies Eau_::-er.t ?rooertv & Rents Taxes Ex::e!'\ses Tc:al S S S S s -S s -r 83,000 7,000 90,000 Page VI-16 198L BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVI SIO~ Co'serv~tion Land ~anaQement ??:)G?.J..:' CO:~SERVATION LA~D HANAGEHENT - CONSERVATION PLANmt-G 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ;..c':':- .;!,.s i , EX?E:1DITURES! REVE:?W2SI EXPE:~~~TURES PROVINCIA~ MUNICIPAL I EX::>;--'DI"'L ::~J ?{,:,/...,.;,..._ I r.C':'I VITY GR.l\tlT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITlJRES REVE~UES . ... _1. ....._....f.. _ _....._=> J , Cons. Plannir.g 90,000 90,000 49,500 40,500 I ! . I I I i I I I I i I I I t , ! I TQTAL 90,000 90,000 49 . 5 00 40.500 I I . Page VI-17 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Manacement P1CG;:{'~,~! CO~SERVATION LA~D MANAGS1ENT - GLEN HAFFY FISH REARH,G PU~?OS2 To carry out a program of fish rearing and stocking for selected Authority Conservation Areas and Forest and Wildlife Areas 1982 03JEC':'IVES To produce approximately 32,000 rainbow trout ".. JI'IG Funding is provided 50% by provincial Grant and 50% Nunicipal Levy 'for this program . u f::: ':;'.~:C!.;r, CO'1~lS~:'S 09JEC':'IVE ClASSIFIC~':'!O~S :1.Jteci.:lls Salaries Sl.t=:?lies s. ~eal Se-- .ces Flnancial & \V3QeS Uti:ities Ec_ior..ent P~oce~ty & Rents Taxes Ex::enses :'otal S S S S $ -r $ S-- 1,500 9,000 10,500 Page VI-l8 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DI/ISlON Conservation Land Manace~ent ?~'JS?_:' v CO:lSERVATION LA.:-!D 1-'l_l\N.:>'GH1ENT - FISH REARING I 1982 BUDGET I SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ;..::: _.;!.S I I! ET I PROVINCIA~ MUNICIPAL I EXPENDITliRESI REVEtlUES EXPEl"DIT"Rc-J EF'V" .Y'" = I .-.::' ! ::,y . EXPE j)ITU~ESI RSVENUES E.>:?E lDITURES GRAnT LEVY OTHER ~ 1,,0.__1...- _....__ I G1an Haf:y Fish , I I Rearing 10,500 10,500 5,250 5,250 I I -"'- ~ 10,500 I 10,500 5,250 j 5,250 I I ..w_."'\~ Page VI-19 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISIOU ConSerJatlon Land Manage~ent P :lOG R.-\ '! CO~SERVl\TION L~ND MANJI.GHIENT OPERATIONS AND MAI"iTENANCE - NON-REVENUE PROPERTIES ?U~?OS: To provide funding for the maintenance of non-revenue producing recreation areas 1532 O~JEC':'I"=:S To maintain 2 Forest and Wildlife Areas and the Woodbridge Flood Plain for non-revenue recreational use ?U"JDI":G Funding is provided 100% by Municl~al Levy on all participating municipalities. fW.~~:C:::.....L CO~~':::lTS C3J~CT::: 'E C~~S5IFICATIONS i1atee-lals Salce-ies Sup~Les .. Real Se- ices financ_:!!. & -;aaes Util1;:ies E:::-, _::Jr.'.ent Pro::e:-tv & Rents Taxes E:<oenses Total $ :;; $ $ $ -r- $ ----s 22,000 14,100 6,000 42,100 Page VI-20 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISIC:I Conser~atlon ~a,d ~anaqe~ent ??OG~M CONSERVATION LA.'\ID HA:-lAGCHENT - OPERATIONS & HAINTENANCE - NON-REVENUE I .2. 932 B~DGET SOJRCES 02 ?INANCING 1981 BUDGE:T I 1981 ;'C:-~r\LS I I I ' I I EXPE:NDITURES, REVS~;i.:ES I SX?E'lDITC?::S! R:::'~':: _::3 I I IIET PROVI KIAL MtJ11I C I PAL I Ar,,;,- !~y , EX?E:!mITu~::SI REVS:WES EXPE,JDITURES GRAtlT LEVY OTHER ~-- I I I IO?e:::-aticns & !-lain : !.:O....-Revenl..e 42,100 - 42,100 - 42,100 I I I I I i I I f , ! i j , , , I I I I I :'O':'i\!.. 42,100 , - 42,100 - 42,100 Page VII - 1 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES THE INFORI1ATIOtl AND EDUCATIOn DIVISION This Division is responsible for the Community Relations Program of the Authority. Conservation Information functions include - the implementation of the general information programs, including the provision of both internal and external communications; - information on resource management pr03rams; and - planning and market research analysis Conservation Education functions include - conservation field centres; - various historical and conservation interpretive programs, and - the Kortright Centre for Conservation Page VII - 2 Conservation Information Programs 1981 Achievements - Provided, at an increased level of service, a Conservation Information Program for Authority members and staff, the general public and special interest and community groups' - Provided brochures, motion picture and photographic materials, exhibits and special functions to implement program; - Identified, through market analysis, the users and potential users of the Authority's public facilities; - Provided information, through seminars, relating to the Authority's resource management programs 1982 Priorities - to provide, at an increased level of service, a Conservation Infor~ation Program for Authority members and staff, the general public and special interest and community groups; - to provide, through market analysis, a communications program for the Authority's public use facilities; - to provide more information, through seminars and publications, on the Authority's resource management programs Conservation Education Programs 1981 Achieveme!:ts - This Section has provided, at the same level of service, outdoor conservation education programs for school students and other community groups at four residential conservation field centres, and a variety of outdoor and conservation education opportunities for the general public and school groups at the Cold Creek Conservation Field Centre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, Bruce's Mill, and an expanded program at the Kortright Centre for Conservation 1982 Priorities - Based on the relativity of individual programs to the Authority's aims and objectives (a) residential conservation field centres i) Boyd and Lake St George Conservation Field Centres ii) Albion Hills and Claremont Conservation Field Centres (b) Kortright Centre for Conservation (c) Cold Creek Conservation Field Centre (d) Black Creek Pioneer Village Educational Programs (e) General Interpretive Program Page ~ 3 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL PROGRMl EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUE Program Admin General 268,385 268,385 134,l92 134,193 222,582 Inform Support 59,990 59,990 29,995 29,995 52,846 Education Support 32,117 32,117 16,059 16,058 28,778 Community Relations Information General 74,100 74,100 39,905 34,195 57,400 Resource Mgt 10,000 10,000 5,500 4,500 5,000 Planning/Market Analysis 125,000 125,000 18,000 107,000 60,000 Con@unity Relations Education Supv Ops & Htce - 1,037,764 873,800 163,964 65,175 98,789 1,084,946* 967,031* Cons Field Centres Supv Ops & Mtce - 393,000 232,150 160,850 17,250 95,000 48,600 251,800 153,000 Kortright Supv Ops & Mtce - 174,450** 179,700* (5,250)*' B C P V Development 180,500 180,500 68,200 55,BOO 56,500 160,000 TOTAL 2,180,856 1,105,950 1,074,906 394,276 575,530 105,100 1,923,352 1,120,031 ~ * Last year, B C P V. amounts were included at "Supv Ops & Mtce " .. These amounts are included in the Historical Sites Division Budget, and do not add to totals here. Page VII - 4 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM Program Administration PURPOSE To provide an administrative, supervisory and support service staff to implement a comprehensive information, communlty and staff relations and outdoor and conservation education program. 1982 OBJECTIVES To continue the programs carried out in 1981 at the same level of service FUNDING This is a shared program, 50% of the funds available form the Province of Ontario and 50% being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 350,492 - - - 10,000 - - 36G,492 Page VII - 5 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM Program Administration 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET Htil ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUE $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ General Salaries 136,100 136,100 68,050 68,050 118,550 Expenses 6,500 6,500 3,250 3,250 5,000 Benefits* 125,785 g5, 785 ~~~ ~~ 99 ,032 268,385 268,385 134,192 134,193 222,582 Community Relations Information Support Salaries 56,490 56,490 28 , 2 45 28,245 50,669 Expenses 3,500 3,500 ..i.L.7 50 1 , 7 50 2,177 59,990 59,990 29,995 29,995 52,846 Community Relations Education Support Salaries 32,117 32,117 16, D 59 16,058 28,778 TOTAL 360 492 360.492 180.246 180.246 304.206 *Benefits - include benefits for all ful1-time, contract and part-time employees of the Information and Education Division. ~ Page ~- 6 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGR!,M Community ReJations - Information - General PURPOSE To provide brochures, still and motion picture photographiC materials, exhibits and special functions to implement the internal and external general information program of the Authority 1982 OBJECTIVES To continue the programs carried out in 1981 FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being ava lable from the Province of Ontario and 45% be i ng funded from the General Levy on all participating municipaliti~s for publications and printing, for photographic, tours and special days The motion picture program, exhibits and promotional contingency are also shared programs, 50% being funded by the Province of Ontario and 50% by the General Levy on all participating municipalities OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Tal'es Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 64,100 - - lO,OOO - - 74,100 P ag e Y!.L..:: 7 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM Community Relations - Information - General 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Publications and 34,500 34,500 l8,975 l8,975 27,200 Printing Photographic 6,500 6,500 3,575 2,925 6,100 Tours and Special 13, lOO l3,lOO 7,205 5,895 6,900 Days Motion Picture 12,000 12,000 6,000 6,000 12,200 prog ram Exhibits 4,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Promotional l,OOO 1,000 500 500 l,OOO Contingency 25th Annniversary 2,000 Program - Biennial 3,000 3,000 1,650 1,350 Conference TOTAL 74 lOO 74,100 39,905 34.195 57.400 Page ~ 8 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAr1: Community Relations - Information - Resource Management Programs PURPOSE To provide information through seminars related to the Authority Resource Management Programs 1982 OBJECTIVES To continue the programs carried out in previous years. FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and 45% being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,000 - - - - _ 10,000 Page JlI..L= 9 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATtS DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM Community Relations - Infocmation - Resource Management Pcogcams 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES S S $ S $ $ $ $ $ $ Watecshed Plan 6,000 6,000 3,300 2,700 5,000 pcojects Presentations Semi-Technical 4,000 4,000 2,200 1,800 Publications Regarding Watecshed Programs TOTAL 10,000 10.000 5.500 4.500 5.000 Page ~ 10 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAt1 Community Relations - Information - Planninq/Marketinq Analysis PURPOSE To identify, through market analysis, the users and potential users of the Authority's public facilities for master planning and to examine and price the product 1982 OBJECTIVES To continue to carry out a marketing program for all Authority public facilities more comprehensive than the program carried out in 1981 To continue to carry out research as a basis for input into the comprehensive 1982 marketing program. FUNDWG Planning is a shared program, 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and 50% being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities For the 1982 marketing program, funds come from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. Expenditures proposed for 1982 are approximately 50% of those estimated to be required in the Watershed Plan It is proposed that full implementation of a comprehensive marketing plan, based on 1981-82 research, will take place in 1983 The benefits of market or business planning accrue through revenues to the programs at Black Creek Pioneer Village, the Conservation Areas, Indian Line Campground and the Kortright Centre for Conservation OBJECTIVE CLASSIFIC~TIONS Materials Salaries Supplies [, Real Services :inancial & Waqes Utilities fquipment Property & Rents Taxes ::xoenses ~ 26,244 lB,OOO BO,756 125,000 Page Y!.L.:11 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM: Community Relations - Information - Planning/Marketing Analysis 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGf,T 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVUJUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Marketing Plan 36,000 36,000 18,000 18,000 24,000 and Research Support 32,000 32,000 32,000 24,800 Supplies 18,000 18,000 18,000 11,200 promotion and 39,000 39,000 39,000 Advertising TOTAL 125,000 135,000 18~OQO 1Q.7 .000 60,000 - P a ':j<: \l.I.L..::.... 12 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISIOtl Information and Educatlon P ROG RM1 Corrununi~LB~.!~ ti.9E-~--=--S.9_1.:l?t:?.!"va~!9~.9~<::~~ion - Supervision, Operations & Maintenance PURPOSE To provide an outdoor conservation education program for school students and other corrununity groups at four (4) residential conservation field centres and a variety of outdoor and conservation education opportunities for the general public and school groups at Cold Creek and Bruce's Mill 1982 OBJECTIVES - to continue the program at the same level of service as in 1981 - to provide an outdoor and conservation education program for the following estimated number of students and adults Conservation Field Centres 15,000 (Residential) Cold Creek & General Interpretive Programs 20,000 FUNDWG Program revenues and the General Levy on all participating municipalities A surplus or deficit on the operations of the Boyd and Lake St George Conservation Field Centres will, by agreement, be charged or credited to the participating Boards of Education The cost of supervisory staff at Albion Hills, Boyd, and Lake St George is funded by a 55% grant from the Province of Ontari04 and 45% being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalites OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & \vages Utilities I qU ipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total 435,737 99,090 21,365 -- 481,572 -- -- 1,037,764 P age v..!.!......:.. 13 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISIOtl Information and Education PROGRAM Corrununity Relations - Conservation Education - Supervision, Operations and Maintenance Conservation Field Centres 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS I NET PROVINCIALIMUNICIPAL EXPENDITURESI REVENUES I ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES Program Supervision 118,500 l18,500 65,175 53,325 112,846 t Boyd C F C 147,000 147,000 188,300 188,300 I t Lake S t George 287,000 287,000 347,000 347,000 i : Albion Hills 191, 000 191, 000 158,100 158,100 I 191,000 Claremont 191,000 138,000 161,000 I Cold Creek F C 40,000 40,000 36,200 36,200 , General Interpretive 17,800 17,800 15,500 15,500 B C P V (Tours & 174,450* 179,700 89,000 60,931 I , PLP) I Major Maintenance Albion 29,464 29,464 29,464 I Claremont 16,000 16,000 16,000 i I - - ----- TOTAL 1,037,764 873,800 163.964 65,175 98 789 1,084,946 967,031 I * These amounts are included in the Historical Sites Division Budget, and do not add to totals here Page ~ 14 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM Corrununity Relations - Conservation Education - Supervision, Operations and Maintenance - Kortright PURPOSE To provide a conservation education program for the public, school and other corrununity groups at the Kortright Centre for Conservation 1982 OBJECTIVES - a continuation of the program to accommodate 82,000 visitations FUNDING Direct program costs are funded from fees, revenues for services, food and sale of merchandise Basic operations are funded by a Ministry of Natural Resources grant of 55% on the Supervisor's salary, a M T R C F grant of $20,000 from the Growth Endowment Fund, with the remainder from the General Levy on all participating municipalities OBJECTIVE CL.a.sSIFICATIOtIS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses ~ 236,580 87,500 5,675 - 63,245 - - 393,000 t'.:h) Jll.L= 15 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION In[ormatlon and Education PROGRAM Corrununity Relations - Conservation Education -_2.9J2.grvision, Operations and Maintenancc-Xortright I 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF rWMlCING 1981 BuDGET 1981 ACTUALS I E {PENDITUHcsI REVENUES NET PROVINCIALl MUNICIPAL EXPENDITUREJ ReVENUES ACTIVITY EXPEtDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES Basic Operations 193,000 193,000 17,250 127,150 48,600' Programs - General 200,000 232,150 (32,150) ! 1982 Portion of the Energy Program 106,250** 106,250** 106,250'* I - - I : 23 2, 1_~_' , TOT^L 393,000 160,850 17,250 95,000 48, 600 i I I -- - -- * $20,000 Growth Endowment Fund ** Ministry of Energy - Overall Funding for this program 28,600 M N R - Fish and Wildlife Program $48,600 l? a 9 -= V.IL.=..- 16 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAr1 Community Relations - Conservation Education - Development PURPOSE To develop the facilities required for the Authority's outdoor and conservation education programs 1982 OBJECTIVES - the development of trails, outdoor exhibits and demonstrations at the Kortright Centre for Conservation; - the development of additional indoor exhibits, furnishings and equipment for the Kortright Centre for Conservation - the development of additional residential conservation field centre accommodation to be funded by participating school board(s) FUNDING The development of the Kortright Cent. e for Conservation is funded by 55% from the Province of Ontario, and 45% from the General Levy on all participating municipalities Funding for the exhibits, furnishings and equipment program at the Kortright Centre is dependent on funds from The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS ~aterials Salaries Supp llP.S " Rl,;dl Services Financial & \vages Utilities Eauipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total 90,000 19,500 23,000 - 48,000 - - 180,500 PageVII -17 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISIOtI Information and Education PROGRAM Community Relations - Conservation Education - Development 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS I tlET PROVINCIALI MUtIICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDI'fURES GHAtlT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES Kortright Develop. (a) General 100,000 100,000 55,000 45,000 (b) Furnishings Exhibits , Equipment 56,500 56,500 56,500 ! onservation Field Centres - General Upgrade 24,000 24,000 J3,200 10,800 TOTAL I 180,500 1 eo , 500 68,200 55,800 56,500 f Page VIII - 1 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES THE HISTORICAL SITES DIVISION This Division is responsible for the Heritage Conservation program, including the development and administration of the Black Creek Pioneer Village, Albion House, historical markers and other historical buildings coming under the jurisdiction of the Authority Page VIII - 2 1981 Achievements Black Creek Pioneer Village was operated in a manner calculated to provide a living portrayal of a cross roads village in pre-confederation days while accommodating, entertaining and offering the opportunity for learning to some 264,000 visitors Some fiscal restraints during the first half of the year required a reduction in the number of buildings open to the public at anyone time. 1982 Priorities The major 1982 priority is the construction of the Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitor Centre A fund-raising program is now underway for this project Priorities for 1982 will continue to be the operation of Black Creek Pioneer Village and the maintenance of all appropriate structures. Funding is provided to have the buildings closed in 1981 under the constraint program open for public use in 1982. 1982 salaries and wages are in accordance with the approved schedules for all Authority program and service staff Page ~3 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Historical Sites SOURCES OF FINANCING NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUE Program Administration 248,700 - 248,700 96,850 151,850 - Operations & Maintenance 1,492,000 1,040,500 451,500 - 249,500 202,00 Educational I Programs 174,450 179,700 (5,250) - (5,250) - Capital ~- Development 1,930,000 - 1,930,000 - - ,930,003 TOTAL 3,845,150 1,220,200 2,624,950 96 850 396,100 ,132,00 I Page VIII - 4 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Historical Sites PROGRAM Heritage - Administration PURPOSE To provide supervisory and support services to implemeQt the heritage conservation programme. 1982 OBJECTIVES To provide the support services at the same level as in 1981 FUNDING Provincial and Municipal funding FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utili ties Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 248,700 - - - - - - 248,700 Page ~- 5 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Historical Sites PROGRAM Heritage - Administration 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGET 1981 ACTUALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES ~ ~ $ $ ~ ~ $ $ $ $ , 40,900 40,900 20,450 20,450 37,000 Salaries - - - Benefits l47,800 - 147,800 73,900 73,900 - 128,405 - Travel 5,000 - 5,000 2,500 2,500 - 4,730 - Vacation, Sick & Statutory Holiday 55,000 - 55,000 -- 55,000 - 52,000 - Pay * TOTAL 248,700 - 248,700 96,850 151, 850 222,135 Page'llIL- 6 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Historical Sites PROGRAM Heritaqe - Operations and Maintenance - Black Creek Pioneer Village PURPOSE To provide a living portrayal of a crossroads village in pre-confederation Ontario 1982 OBJECTIVES To continue the effective operation of this heritage conservation project To accon@odate approximately 290,000 visitors To maintain the Village's heritage structures FUNDING More than two-thirds of the funding comes from admission receipts, sales outlets and other Village operations Approximately one-fifth comes from municipal levy Under Other Funding, the following amounts are derived - $144,000 is anticipated from a Ministry of Culture and Recreation Museum Grant; - 18,000 is anticipated from t~e Black Creek Pioneer Village Growth Endowment Fund interest; - 10,000 is anticipated from private donation FINANCIAL COMMENTS It is expected that the new, vigorous marketing program will result in a 10% increase in admission and sales revenue, amounting to additional revenue of $57,500 The approved increase in student rates effective January and September 1982 will add revenue of $15,000 The Dominion Carriage Works, Taylor Cooperage, Sawyers Home and the Richmond Hill Manse will not be opened due to lack of funding. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total 1,065,400 364,300 - - 50,300 12,000 - 1,492,000 Page .Y.lll::7 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIV ISJ:OtI HistoLica1 Sites ? ~OG ::tr....! Heritage - Operations & Maintenance - Black Creek Pioneer Village I I 1982 3liDG2T I SOUR~ES OF FINANCING 1981 BUOCi2T 1981 AC':''':.;'LS I I EX?ENDITURESI REVENUES I EXPE~~iTURES PROVINCIALl MUNICIPAL EXPENDITURES I REVENUES EXPENDITURES! ~::'IE~(J::S j ,\CTIVITY GRANT LEVY OTHER I I , 'Supervision 445,000 5,000 440,000 - 435,000 5,000 I lcostume 22,500 1,000 21,500 - 21,500 - I Registrar 31,500 2,000 29,500 - 29,500 - J Gate 26,300 536,000 (509! 700) I (509,700) I - - I ! jGift Shop Entrance 144,500 166,000 (21,500) - (21,500) - I Gift Shop-Museum 60,400 80,000 (19,600) - JI9,600) , - j weddings 11,500 22,000 (10,500) - (10,500) - I Special Events 39,000 2,000 37,000 37,000 . - - I iLivcstock . 88,500 5,000 83,500 - 83,500 - I !carpenters Shop 14,600 500 14,100 - 14,100 - I I Peacock Woods 10,000 10,000 , - - - 0,000 . I Food 14,000 50,000 (36,000) (36,000) . - - Non-Designated Areas 4l,200 - 41,200 - 6,200 5,000 I ! Sleigh Rides 500 1,000 ( 500) - ( 500) - I I /BUilding Activities , 542,500 170,000 372,500 - 220,500 52,000 I j I I I I ""- -f TOTAL $1,492,000 ,040,500 451,500 - 249,500 ~02,000 i Page VIII - 8 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Historical Sites PROGRAM Heritage - Education Programme PURPOSE To provide conservation education opportunities for school groups by group tours and by a Pioneer Life Craft programme 1982 OBJECTIVES To maintain existing levels of service for 60,000 students combined in both Tour and Pioneer Life Programmes. FUNDING The prograrrune is planned to be self sustaining FINANCIAL COMMENTS It is anticipated that revenues will be augmented by increased rates for both Tour and Pioneer Life Programmes, plus a reduction in operating costs in some areas OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents ~ Expenses ~ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Tours 92,200 11,500 - - - - - 103,700 Pioneer Life Programme 40,400 30,350 - - - - - 70,750 Page ~9 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIV ISIOtl Histo~ica1 Sites ?::?OGRA..I Heritage - Education Programs I I 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING I 1981 BUDGET I 1981 AC':'iJ.:'l.LS I I I NET PROVINCIALIMUNICIPAL EXPENDITURESI REVE~UES i rlCTIVITY EX?E~DITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES r I /Tours 103,700 138,750 (35,050) (35,050) /p ioneer Life Program 70,750 40,950 29,800 29,800 I I I , , I I - I TOTAL 174,450 179,700 (5,250) (5,250) Page VIII - 10 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Historical Sites PROGRAM Heritage - Capital Development PURPOSE To carry out restoration and development work at the Black Creek Pioneer Village in accordance with approved plans 1982 OBJECTIVES To complete the restoration of the Richmond Hill Marse and the Sawyers House To construct the Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitor Centre To dismantle Nesbitt Saw Mill and re-erect same at Black Creek Pioneer Vi~lage FUNDING Funding for this program is from diverse sources, including Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation, municipal contributions and Province of Ontario including Wintario FINANCIAL COMMENTS A major funding appeal is underway for the Visitor Centre Construction will proceed when funding commitments are in hand OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL 1,9'30,000 1,930,000 PageVIII - 11 1982 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Historical Sites PROGRAM Heritage - Capital Development 1982 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1981 BUDGI':T 198-l AC1'lJALS NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL I ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUE~ EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES Richmond Hill 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Manse and the Sawyers House Visitors Centre 1,800,000 L,800,OOO ,800,00 Nesbitt Sawmill 100,000 100,000 100,001 TOTAL 1 930 000 1 930,000 l,930,00 30.000 30,000 ~ A-54 V the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes AUTHORITY MEETING 1982.05.14 13/82 Meeting 13/82 of the Authority was held 82.05.14 at the Authority Office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview. The meeting was called to order at 0930 hours in Humber Room. PRESENT Chairman Dr. J.K. Reynolds Vice-Chairman Mrs. F. Gell Members J.E. Anderson M.W.H. Biggar M.J. Breen S.W Caldwell R.J Fitzpatrick Mrs. F. Edna Gardner Robert Gillespie S.T. Griffiths, R.P.F. Gavin Henderson W.R. Herridge, Q.C. Mrs. L.D. Jackson Don Jackson E.V. Kolb David Lacey Dr. T.H Leith S.A. Macpherson F.J. McKechnie W.G. McLean Ms. S. Nimmo F .R. Perkins Mrs M. prinsloo John Rupke J.S. Scott H.M. Smith, Q.C. M.M R. Stewart Hrs Betty Sutherland William Sutherland Mrs. H.D. Sutter Dr. W. M . Tove 11 R.F.M. Yuill Metro Toronto Treasury Department P.G. Einarson Clarkson Gordon, Chartered Accountants Eric Ford . . . . Bruce Jackson . . . . Mrs. Gina Katz Mrs. Lynn McInnis ABSENT Members W.G. Barber Mrs. C. Bell J.A. Bryson Mrs. P.T. Clark D. L. Cook S.J. Daurio D.G. Fleet Edward Fulton Mrs. Lois Hancey W.J. Kelly Eldred King C. F. Kline M.D. Lipton, Q.C. V.K. McCreary P.E. Oyler G.B. Sinclair Mrs. Norah Stoner Mrs. Alma Walker G.A. Williams A-55 -2- MINUTES Res. 143 Moved by: S.A. Macpherson Seconded by S.W. Caldwell THAT the Minutes of Meeting 12/82 be approved. CARRI ED; CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS The Chairman announced, wi th regret, the recent death of Mr C.R purcell. Mr. Purcell was a very dedicated conservationist and a participant in the Guelph Conference which, to many, was a major forerunner of the conservation authorities. He was a founder of the moveme~t in Ontario; the first and only Chairman of the R.D.H P Conservation Authority from 1954 to 1957; and a founding member of the M.T.R.C A and Chairman of its R D.H P Advisory Board from 1957 through 1971. A debt of gratitude is owed to Mr. Purcell for his early work on the Authority. Dr. Reynolds delivered a presentation on the progress that the Authority has made since the beginning of the year. His comments included highlights from the Advisory Board meetings, the personnel management function and reorganization of the Finance Administration Division, the appointment of a new Administrator of the Water Resource Division, and the good progress that has been made with the Committee to Study the Reorganization of the Authority Committee System. The Chairman said, "I doubt if there has ever been a period of more sustained activity by the Authority, in such a variety of endeavours, as has taken place in the first 4-1/2 months of this year" Dr Reynolds introduced Mr P.G Einarson, Metropolitan Toronto Treasury Department, Mr Eric Ford, Senior Partner, and Mr Bruce Jackson, Mrs Gina Katz, and Mrs Lynn McInris, of the firm Clarkson Gordon, Chartered Accountants INFORMATION PRESENT\TION Mr P 13 Flood, Administrator, Conservation Land Management Division, gave a slide presentation on the Conservati~n Land Management programmes, indicating history, developmen<:., and the revised programmes as dictated by the changing characteristics of the watershed REPORT #3/82 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res 144 Moved by Mrs F. Edna Gardner Seconded by Mrs. Florence Gell THAT Report 13/82 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #3/82, held 82.03.17. CARRIED; REPORT H/82 OF TilE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Section I, Item 1 1981 Auditor's Report and Financial Statements -Presentation by Mr Eric Ford, Clarkson Gordon Res H5 Moved by Mrs. Florence Gell Seconded by: Dr. W.M. Tovell THAT Item 1, Section I of Report 14/82 of the Executive Committee be received; AND FURTHER TIIAT the 1981 Auditor's Report and Financial Statements to December 31, 1981, be approved, signed by the Chairman and the Secretary-Treasurer of the Authority, and distributed in accordance with Section 39 (3) of the Conservation Authorities Act CARRIED; Section II Res 146 Moved by M W. H. Biggar Seconded by S.A. Macpherson THAT Section II of Report #4/82 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #4/82, dated 82 04.07. CARRIED; -3- A-56 REPORT 15/82 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Section I, Item 1 Watershed Plan (1980) Flood Control Programme -Proposed Modifications to the Limits of the Unionville Flood Damage Centres - Rouge River Res. '47 Moved by: Mrs. B. Sutherland Seconded by Mrs. F. Edna Gardner THAT the limits of the Unionville Damage Centres, as contained in the Flood Control Programme of the Watershed Plan, be revised to include the addition of five small areas as these areas are currently developed or approved for development in the near future, and the deletion of one area as the approved draft plan of sub- division would remove the area from the Regional Storm flood plain. CARRIED: Section I, Item 2 Conservation Area Development Project 1982 Res. 148 Moved by Mrs. B. Sutherland Seconded by Mrs. F. Edna Gardner THAT "A Project for the Conservation, Development, and Management of Resources in Co-operation with the Province of Ontario Job Creation Initiatives 1982", as appended as Schedule "A" of the Minutes of Meeting 15/82 of the Executive Committee, be adopted: AND FURTHER THAT the following action be taken (a) The Regional Municipalities of Peel, York and Durham, The Municipality of Metropolitnn Toronto, and the Townships of Adjala and Mono, be requested to approve this application of Special Revenues: (b) T1e Ministry of Natural Resources be requested to approve the project: (c) The appropriate Authority officials be authorized to take whatever action is required in connection therewith, including the execution of any documents: (d) A delegation of Authority members be appointed to present this project to The Honourable Alan Pope, Minister of Natural Resources CARRIED: Section I, Item 3 Appointment to Conservation Land Management Advisory Board Res. 149 Moved by Mrs. B Sutherland Seconded by Mrs F. Edna Gardner THAT the appointment of Mrs Catherine C Huhn as a member of the Conservation Land Management Advisory Board for 1982 be approved CARRIED: Section II Res ISO Moved by Dr. T H. Leith Seconded by W.R. Herridge, Q.C THAT Section II of Report t5/82 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting '5/82, held 82 04 28 CARRIED: NEW BUSINESS Mrs. Maureen Prinsloo invited the Authority to hold its next meeting at the offices of the Borough of Scarborough Dr Reynolds accepted, with nppreciation, the Borough's hospitality for Authority Meeting #4/82, to be held 82 06 11. A-57 -4- Mrs. Gardner reminded the members that a light luncheon would be served at 12:30, followed by the Honour Roll Awards. It had been planned to coincide with today's meeting so that more members would be able to attend this annual ceremony. Mrs. Jackson announced that the Woodbridge Centennial celebration will be held on June 5, and hoped to welcome many of those present on the occasion. ADJOURNMENT On motion, the meeting adjourned 1982.05.14:1205. J.K Reynolds W.E. Jones Chairman Secretary-Treasurer 1982.05.25 KC. ~ A-58 , the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes AUTHORITY MEETING 1982.06 11 '4/82 . Meetln~ 14/82 of the Authority was held 82.06.11 at the Borough of Scarborough Municipal Office, l50 Borough Drive, Scarborough The meeting was called to orner at 0940 hours in the Meeting Hall PRESENT -- Chairman Dr J K. Reynolds Vice-Chairman Mn; F. Ge 11 Members ,-"'J. E Anderson h.G. Barber M.W H. Biggar M.J. Breen J A. Bryson S.W. Caldwell D L. Cook S.J. Daurio R.J Fitzpatrick D.G. Fleet Edward Fulton Mrs. F. Edna Gardner Robert Gillespie S.T Griffiths, R.P F Mrs Lois Hancey Gavin Henderson W R Herridge, Q.C. Don Jackson E.V. Kolb David Lacey Dr. T.H. Leith M D. Lipton, Q.C S.A. Macpherson V.K. McCreary F.J. McKlj!chnie W.G. McLean F. R. Perkins Mrs. M. prinsloo John Rupke G.B. Sinclair M.M. Smith, Q.C. M.M.R. Stewart Mrs. Norah Stoner Mrs. Betty Sutherland William Sutherland Mrs. H.D Sutter Dr. W.M. Tovell Mrs Alma Walker Environment Canada D.R. Cuthbert Ministry of Natural Resources Robert Chang . . . . Christine T. Kowalyk ABSENT Members Mrs. C. Bell Mrs. P.T. Clark Mrs. L.D. Jackson W.J. Kelly Eldred King C F. Kline Ms. S. Nimmo P E. Oyler J . S. 'G:..otr.:. G.A Williams R.F M Yuill A-59 -2- MINU'fES Res 151 Moved by G.B Sinclair Seconded by Mrs N. Stoner THAT the Minutes of Meeting 13/82 be approved. CARRIED: GREETINGS Controller Joyce Trimmer brought greetings from the Borough of Scarborough: -Mr. Chairman and Members of the Authority I think it is obvious how pleased I am to be your official 'meeter and greeter' on behalf of the Borough of Scarborough Mayor and Council. Many of you know I was on the Authority for five years and I do feel I have some very good friends on the Authority... I realise that in the present economic situation that acquisition of large tracts of land by the Authority is probably something in the past, which makes it even more important that the land we have is protected strenously to ensure that it is not gobbled up and spoiled by urbanization and development. I happen to be very concerned about the Rouge, and if there is one message I would like to give to the Authority today it is that I hope it will continue to take a strong stand where development of surrounding Authority land is concerned and, perhaps, take a stronger stand when it comes to adjacent development and the rules the developers must comply with to protect these very sensitive areas. Unf9rtunately, I think there are many urban planners and too many politicians who do not appreciate the sensitivity. Again, I am very happy to meet all myoId friends -- I miss the Conservation Authority meetings Welcome to Scarborough -- it's very good to see you'- RESPONSF,; Dr. Reynolds thanked Controller Trimmer for her kind and encouraging words, and assured her that her remarks would be very much borne in mind AUTHORITY MEETING 15/82 On behalf of the Reeve of the Township of Mono, Mr. Robert Gillespie invited the Authority to hold the meeting scheduled for 1982 10.14 at the Township Offices, and for lunch following the meeting. He hoped it would be possible for members to tour the Hockley Valley at that particular time of the year. Mr. Gillespie thanked Dr. Tovell for making this suggestion and for his efforts in causing this meeting to be arranged. Dr. Reynolds accepted the invitation on behalf of the members, ~nd stated that the inclusion of a tour would be considered CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS Dr Reynolds noted that there were several unavoidable absences: Mrs. Gell, Mr. Biggar, Mrs Sutherland, and Mr. Higgs were scheduled to make a presentation at this time to Metro Budget Committee concerning the Black Creek pioneer Village Visitors Centre. The Chairman announced the retirement from the Nickel District Conservation Authority of Chairman Colin Caswell, a long-time friend of all the conservation authorities, and stated that he would attend a dinner to be held in Sudbury this evening in Mr Caswell's honour. AUDIO/VISUAL PRESENTATION B.E. Denney, Head, Waterfront Section, Water Resource Division, introduced an audio/visual plesentation, developed for use at the Kortright Centre for Conservation, depicting the history of the Scarborough Bluffs. THE CANADA/ONTARIO FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROGRAM J.C. Mather, Administrator, Water Resource Division, introduced the members of the Steering Comlnittee of The Canada/Ontario Flood Damage Reduction Program: Mr. 0 R. Cuthbert, Environment Canada, and Mr. Robert Chang and Ms. Christine T. Kowalyk of the Ministry of Natural Resources , -3- A-60 On March 31, 1978, Canada and Ontario signed a Flood Damage Reduction Program Agreement The Program is based on the premise that the best way to avoid the mounting toll of flood damage is to regulate development within the flood plain. In 1979, this Authority endorsed the policies and objectives included in the agreement Grants have been received for flood plain mapping and for hydraulic, hydrologic, and several other studies. Mr Robert Chang, Ministry of Natural Resources, reported briefly on the designation process Mr Chang advised that the Ministry had been working with Authority staff to prepare the maps displayed at this meeting These are the public information maps delineating the flood risk areas within the M.T R C A. As flood risk maps are completed, the federal and provincial ministers responsible for the program intend to designate the flood risk area as a zone within which certain government policies ~ill apply Questions asked by members were answered by Mr. Cuthbert and Mr. Chang. On behalf of the Authority, the Chairman expressed appreciation to the Steering Committee for its presentation. REPORT 16/82 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res. 152 Moved by S.A. Macpherson Seconded by: F.R. Perkins THAT Report 16/82 of the Executive Committee be received. CARRIED: REPORT #7/82 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE On behalf of the Members, the Chairman congratulated Mr W.A. McLean, Deputy General Manager, upon being selected to work with the Ministry of Natural Resources in the development of a provincial Strategy for Waterfront Programmes. Res. 153 Moved by: Mrs. H.D. Sutter Seconded by S.W. Caldwell THAT the Authority request the Executive Committee to re-consider the matter of provision of a car for the Chairman's use. . CARRIED: Res 154 Moved by G.B. Sinclair Seconded by Mrs. F. Edna Gardner THAT Report 17/82 of the Executive Committee be received. CARRIED: NEW BUSINESS Mailing Insert Pamphlet Mrs Gardner reported on a small pamphlet, prepared by Information & Education, on the Black Creek Pioneer Village, the Kortright Centre for Conservation, and the Conservation Areas. With the co-operation of the Mayor and Treasurer of the Borough of Etobicoke, and on the stipulation that its insertion would not increase postage costs, this was included in the mailing of water bills to Borough residents. The brochure outlines the principal work of the Authority, and L<<s recreational programmes Mrs. Gardner expressed the hope that the other municipalities will help to circulate the pamphlet throughout the Authority's jurisdiction. A-6l -4- Black Creek pioneer village Visitors Centre -Presentation to Metro Finance Committee Mrs. Gell reported that a presentation had this morning been made to Metropolitan Toronto Finance Committee by Mrs. Betty Sutherland, Mr. Michael Biggar, Mr. Higgs, and herself, and that a grant of $500,000. has been approved, conditionally upon the Minister of Natural Resources approving the project. ADJOURNMENT On motion, the meeting adjourned 1982 06.l1 1135. J.K. Reynolds W E. Jones chairman Secretary-Treasurer Ke. L ) A-62 the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes AUTHORITY MEETING 1982 10 07 15/82 Meeting #5/82 of the Authority was held 82 lO 07 at the Township of Mono Municipal Office, Camilla, Ontario The meeting was called to order at 1030 hours in the Council Chamber PRESENT Acting Chairman Mrs. Florence Gell Members M w.n Biggar M J. Breen J A Bryson D G Fleet Mrs F Edna Gardner Robert Gillespie S.T Griffiths, RPF Mrs Lois Hancey Gavin Henderson W.R Herridge, QC Don Jackson W J Kelly E.V Kolb David Lacey Dr. T.H Leith S. A. Macpherson F.J. McKechnie F.R. Perkins John Rupke J S. Scott G.B Sinclair M.M Smith, QC M.M R. Stewart Mrs Betty Sutherland William Sutherland Mrs H D Sutter C.E. Thompson Dr. W.M. Tovell Chairman of Management Board and M.P.P., Dufferin-Simcoe The Hon George R. McCjigue Reeve, Township of Mono George A Reid Councillor, Township of Mono Mrs Sheila Donaldson . n n Doug Howse ABSENT Chairman Dr J.K Reynolds Members J E Anderson W G Barber Mrs C Bell S.W. Caldwell Mrs P T Clark D L Cook S J Daurio R J Fitzpatrick Edward Fulton Mrs L D. Jackson Eldred King M D Lipton, QC V K McCreary W G McLean Ms S Nimmo P E Oyler I , / 11.-63 -2- lIllSENT (Contd. ) Members Mrs Maureen Prinsloo Mrs Norah Stoner Mrs. 1I.lma Walker R F M Yuill GREETINGS --- The Chair-man introduced Reeve George II Reid, who brough t gree t i I1gs from the 1'ownnhip of: Mono "Thank you very much, Madam Chairman It is indeed a pleasure, on behalf of Mono Council, to have the opportunity of saying that you ar-a very welcome here - for the first time in my knowledge I find it intriguing that a group such as you would consider coming up to -- as we call it -- God' s country, real izing, of course, that we occupy the smallest portion of the total area of your conservation authority I believe I heard Bruce Sinclair making some comments at a recent conference when some critical remarks were being made regarding conservation authorities in general He described Metro Authority, and when he said the word 'Mono' , I knew he knew the correct way to say Mono Township! When I realizeo that the Chairman of the Board of Management, The Honourable George ~lcCague, was coming, I was curious - and very pleased - about this . . whether he was coming to see how you treated us or how we treated you I " . . . On behalf of the Council of Mono Township, Mr Reid presented two memen tos to Mrs Gell a book "The Green Hills of Mono" , and a 'trade' dollar RESPONSE ---,---- Hr Michael Biggar responded on behalf of th e Au thori ty aMadam Chairman, Mr. Minister, Reeve Reid, and Members of the Author.ity- I would like to take th is opportunity to thank the Reeve for his very hospitable welcome You are very important, 11r Reid, to the Authority! As you are aware, this is a historic occasion because since 1957, this is the first meeting we have been fortunate enough to hold here I hope it will not be the last onel The Authority looks on Adjala and Mono as a very important element in its Flood Control Programme. There are very many people just sou th of you who are impacted by the programmes in this area You were the first Townships to communicate with the Authority to approve and support our Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitor Centre. The warmth and hospitality you have shown is immense We hope this good rapport will continue. INTRODUCTION OF THE HONOURABLE GEORGE R McCAGUE Mr. Emil Kolb introduced The Honourable George R. McCague, Chairman of Management Board and M P.P, Dufferin-Simcoe aIt is my pleasure this morning to have the opportunity of introducing to you a very familiar face He was born and raised in this riding, a t tend eel the Ontario Agricultural College in Guelph; he is married, with th ree sons and one daughter George has a wide experience and knowledge in farming, .real estate, insurance, and the sod business In the early Sixties, he was Councillor, Reeve, Depu ty Reeve, Mayor of Alliston, and Warden of Simcoe County in 1966 He was elected Chairman of the Niagara Escarpment Commission in 1973, and has done a tremendous job in trying to preserve the Escarpment from Niagara Falls to Tobermory It is with great pleasure that I have the opportunity of introducing the Chairman of Management Board, The Honourable George McCague t -3- A-64 RESPONSE "Good morning everybody, Madam Chairman, Your Worship . . It is a privilege to be with you this morning and to bring you greetings from the wonderful riding of Dufferin-Simcoe, Any of you wishing to move north will be welcome! . I am very well aware of the very fine work which the the Authorities do -- and, in particular, Metro -- which is the senior Authority You, too, run into a lot of controversy in developing various projects, but you only have to look back to understand the wisdom of those who went before you I did not realise that the House would be back in session when I accepted your invitation to come here, and I do have to go back Thank you very much for the invitation, thank you for coming to Dufferin-Simcoe, and thank you, Your Worship, for the offer of a fine meal! Greetings and good wishes to all of you " INTRODUCTION OF MR CLAYTON THOMPSON, NEW MEMBER Mrs Dianne Sutter introduced Mr Clayton Thompson, appointed by The Regional Municipality of Peel, to fill the vacancy left by the late Mr C F Kline "Most of us feel that people who get interested in conservation work are those who volunteer or who are appointed, but there are people who used to work for the Authority and who have kept up their interest in its work I would like to introduce to you this morning Mr Clay Thompson, who is taking Mr. Kline's place and will, we hope, be re-appoi n ted in November Clay worked for the Authority in the very early days in the financial aspect . his resume you have He works for Magna International as Controller, and he brings financial experience which should be valued by this Authority Welcome to the Authority, Clay Thompson!" MINUTES Res. 155 Moved by D Jackson Seconded by W Sutherland THAT the Minutes of Meeting 14/82 be approved CARRIED CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS "I have no remarks except that I am delighted to be here and to see how many of you are here, too!" REPORT 18/82 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res. 156 Moved by Mrs F. Edna Gardner Seconded by M W H Biggar THAT Report 18/82 of the Executive Committee be received. CARRIED; REPORT 19/82 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res. 157 Moved by Mrs. H D Sutter Seconded by W Sutherland THAT Section I of Report 19/82 of the Executive Committee be received; AND FURTHER THAT the recommendation, as contained therein and set forth herein, be approved WHEREAS C Frederick Kline was appointed a member of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority by the Town of Brampton from 1961 through 1973, and by The Regional Municipality of Peel from 1974 to 1982, and served in that capacity, without interruption, until his death on Saturday, June 19, 1982; J l\-65 -4- l\ND WHEREAS r-lr Kline served on the Executive Committee, through h is office as Chai.rman of Ule Ptobicoke-Mimico Advisory Board, from 1965 to 1981 inclusive, as a memher of the FinAnce Sub-Committee ftom 1968 through 1981, and as a member of the Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board from 1962 to the present; AND WHEREAS, by his long and devoteo service to conservation in general, his deep and outspo~en concern for the protection of flood plain lands in particular, and his unstinted hard work whenever and wherever needurl, Mr Kl ine has inuneasurably enhanced the work and objectives of the Authority; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED 1'I1AT On the sao occasion of the dea th of Mr. C Frederick Kline on SaturdAY, .June 19, 1982, the members and staff of ']'he Met-ropo] itan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority convey to Mr Kl i ne I s family their deepes t sympathy and the personal loss which will be experienced by fl'llow memb<?rs and sta f:f Cl.1 i ke; THAT the Authority gr.atefu.1ly acknow.1.r'c1ges the very considerable contribution to its work maoe hy Mr. f:line during his twenty-one years of service; THAT a framed copy of this resolution be presented to his family; AND FURTHER THAT the General Manager confer with the Council of The Regional Municipality of Peel to seek an occasion when an illuminated scroll - commemorating Fred Kline's long involvement with The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority as an appointed member from Peel Council, and as Chairman of the Etobicokc-Mimico Wat<?rshed Advisory Board; and his and his wife's tangible interest in the Black Creek pioneer Village by their donation of furnishings to the Town Hall - may be presented to the Kl ine fami .1y in recognition of and gJ:at itnde for his many services CARRIED; Res. 150 Moved by M M Smith, Q C ----. Seconded by F.R Perkins THAT Sec'don II of Report 19/02 of the Executive Committee .'Je received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #9/82, held 82 06 30 CARRIED; REPORT 1110/82 OF THE EXECU'rrVE COMMITTEE Res 159 ~toved by G.B Sinclair Seconded by Dr. W M Tovell THAT Section I of Report UO/82 of the Executive Conunittee be received; AND FURTHER THAT the recommendation, as con ta ined there in and set for th herein, be approved The limits of the Lake Wilcocks Damage Centre be modified to reflect the reduction in the extent of the flood plain achieved by the improvements lo the outfall of the lake CARRIED; Res. #60 Moved by M W.H Biggar Seconded by S.A. Macpherson THAT Section II of Report 110/82 of the Executive Conunittee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #10/82, held 82 07 14 CARRIED; REPORT 1111/82 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res. 16l Moved by M M Smith, Q C Seconded by S A. Macpherson THAT Report Ul/82 of the Executive Conunittee be received CARRIED; . -5- A-66 REPORT 112/82 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res 162 Moved by G.B. Sinclair Seconded by Mrs L Hancey THAT Section I of Report 112/82 of the Executive Committee be received; AND FURTHER THAT the recommendation, as contained therein and set forth herein, be approved Messrs. Gordon R. Baker and Murray M.R Stewart be appointed members of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation for a three-year period each, commencing October 7, 1982 CARRIED; -Reform and Revision of the Conservation Authorities in Ontario" As requested, the above-noted report of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, as referred to in Resolution #26l of Executive Report #12/82, will be forwarded to membcrs (together with the response of Mr John Stephen, Chairman of the Association of Conservation Authorities of Ontario, if available) with the Minutes of Authority Meeting 15/82 Res. 163 Moved by Dr W M Tovell Seconded by J S Scott THAT Section II of Report 112/82 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #12/82, held 82 09 08 CARRIED; REPORT 113/82 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Res. 164 Moved by Mrs. L Hancey Seconded )y M.W.H Bigg:lr THAT SE:'ction I or Report Il3/82 of th,~ Executive Committee be received; AND FUR'rHER THAT Recommendation #l, as set forth hercin, be approved !! WHEREAS Mayor Garnet A Williams of the Town of Vaughan was appointed a member of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority by The Regional Municipality of York in 1973, and served in that capacity until his death on Saturday, September 18, 1982; AND WHEREAS Mr. Williams served as a member of the Humber Valley Advisory Board from 1973 through 1982, the Historical Sites Advisory Board 1973-1974, the Flood Control & Water Conservation Advisory Board 1975, the Reforestation & Land Use Advisory Board 1976-1977, and the Information & Education Advisory Board 1978-l982; AND WHEREAS the work of the Authority in the Town of Vaughan and The Regional Municipality of York has been fostered and supported for many years by Garnet Williams; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the members and staff of The Metropolitan Toronto and "Region Conservation Authority convey to Mr Williams's family and the Town of Vaughan their deepest sympathy on his passing; THAT the A~thority acknowledges his encouragement of its aims and objectives over an extended period of time; AND FURTHER THAT the staff be directed to arrange for presentation of an illuminated resolution to the family of Mr Williams at a meeting of Council to be indicated by the Town of Vaughan Res. 165 Moved by Mrs H D Sutter Seconded by S.A. Macpherson THAT Recommendation 12, as set forth herein, be approved I~ The following appointments and re-appointments be made to The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation New Members Effective Date Mr. Bruce A Smith Three-year period commencing 82.l0 07 Mrs. Marion Hahn Bradshaw ".. II .. A , A-67 -6- Re-appointments Effective ,Date Mr Harvey H Clare May 8, 1983 - May 8, 1986 Mr Fred T Collict Feb. 1, 1983 - Feb l, 1986 Dr T H Leith Apr.20, 1983 - Apr 20, 1986 Mr. W.H. Stephenson July 4, 1983 - July 4, 1986 CARRIED; VICE-CHAIRMAN'S INTRODUCTORY REMARKS -1983 PRELININARY BUDGET The 1983 Preliminary Budget which we are to consider today is the result of a budget preparation process which began last June, with a detailed analysis by staff of programme requirements for 1983 which were considered by the Advisory Boards in August and September The provincial restraint programme, introduced two weeks ago, with which the Authority will be required to comply, meant that the work done over the summer months by staff and the Advisory Boards had to be hurriedly revis~d The Executive Committee last week considered the budget proposals as revised to comply with provincial restraint It is this constrained budget which is before you today Although it does not contain all of the important work that we would have wished to do next year, the Preliminary Budget does contain the high priority items recommended by the Advisory Boards, and the Executive Committee recommends it to you for your adoption It is very important that the Preliminary Budget reflect, as accurately as possible, the programme that the Authority intends to carry out in the next year It is this document which we forward to the Province of Ontario and our member municipalities for their review, and on which they base their calculation of our funding requirements Prior to our discussing the budget detail, I would ask the General Manager to present the budget highlights to you " Res. #66 ~oved by Dr. T H -eith -------- Seconded by M W H Biggar THAT F:ecommendation 13, 1983 Preliminary Budget Estimates, as appended as Schedule "AR of these Minutes, be approved CARRIED; Res. 167 Moved by G.B Sinclair Seconded by F.J. McKechnie THAT Recommendation 14, 1983 Amendments to Ontario Regulation 139/80, as appended as Schedule "B" of these Minutes, be approved CARRIED; Res. 168 Moved by J.S. Scott Seconded by: Mrs H D Sutter 15(a)The 'Addendum to the Project for Channel Improvements, Main Humber River, -- Village of Bolton, Town of Caledon", as appended as Schedule 'C' of the Minutes of Executive Meeting 113/82, be approved, and that the following action be taken (i) The Government of Ontario be requested to approve the Addendum to the Project and a gra~t in the amount of $290,000 00; (ii) The Government of Ontario be requested to approve the use of the provincial Share of revenues from the sale of Authority land, in the amount of $106,900 00, in conjunction with the grant; (iii) When approved, the appropriate Authority officials be authorized to take whatever action is required in connection with the Addendum, including the executive of any necessary documents; (b)"A Project for Channel Improvements on the East Branch of the Highland Creek", as appended as Schedule 'D' of the Minutes of Executive Meeting 113/82, be adopted, and that the following action be taken (i) The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be designated as the benefiting municipality on the basis set forth in the project; (ii) The Government of Ontario be requested to approve the project and a grant of 55% of the cost; -7- A-68 (iii) When approved, the appropriate Authority officials be authorised to take whatever action is required in connection with the project, including the execution of any necessary documents CARRIED; Res #69 Moved by Mrs F Edna Gardner Seconded by: S A Macpherson THAT Recommendation 16, as set forth herein, be approved Staff negotiate a suitable agreement with A J Equipment Sales Ltd for the development and operation of a rental snowmobile programme at the Claireville Conservation Area for the winter period 1982-1983 CARRIED; Res #70 Moved by G B Sinclair Seconded by Dr W M Tovell THAT Section II of Report #13/82 of the Executive Committee he received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #13/82, held 82 09 29 CARRIED; Mrs Gardner commended the following members who have successfully approached their municipalities with regard to inclusion in utility bill mailings of information on the Authority's recreational facilities D L Cook W G McLean Mrs L Hancey M W H Biggar E V Kolb W Sutherland FILL, CONSTRUCTION AND ALTERATION TO WATERWAYS' REGULATION -Proposed Amendments Res #71 Moved by F J McKechnie Seconded by S A Macpherson WHEREAS the 39 members of the Legislative Assembly within the jurisdiction of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority have been notified of the Authority's proposed revisions to its Fill, Construction and Alteration to waterways' Regulation; AND WHEREAS the proposed revisions have been forwarded to the Authority's 23 member municipalities for comment and concurrence; BE IT RESOLVED THAT in consideration of all comments received, the proposed revisions to the Authority's Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways' Regulation be amended to provide for minor modifications to the location of the "fill regulation line" for specific areas on the following map sheets so as to more accurately reflect the criteria used - Rouge River #9 - Humber River #107 - Waterfront #23, #24 - Humber River #66 - Don River #22 - Don River #5W - Humber River #65 - Don Ri ver #15 - Duffin Creek #44 - Don River #16E - Don River #20 - Highland Creek #14 - Don River #22 - Rouge River #5 - Don River #23 - Rouge River #4 - Humber River #6 - Rouge River #8 - Humber River #19 - Rouge River #36 - Humber River #104 - Rouge River #9, #10 THAT subject to the approval of the Lieutenant-Governor in Council, the proposed revisions, as amended, to the Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways' Regulation, consisting of a text and schedules 1 through 10, both inclusive, and map Nos 1 through 377, both inclusive, for the valleys, and map Nos 1 through 29, both inclusive, for the waterfront, be approved; THAT the aforementioned schedules 1 through 10, both inclusive, and map Nos 1 through 377, both inclusive, for the valleys, and map Nos 1 through 29, both inclusive, for the waterfront, are adopted as defining that part of the area over which The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has jurisdiction A-69 -8- in which, in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding or pollution or the conservation of land may be affected by the placing or dumping of fill ; AND FURTIlER THAT until the said proposed revisions are approved by the Lieutcnant- Governor in Council, the Authority will continue to apply and administer its Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways' Regulation in its present form. CARRIED; CONFLICT OF INTEREST Res. 172 Moved by: D. Jackson Seconded by: S.A. Macpherson THAT the report of the Sub-Committee appointed by Resolution #34/82 of the Authority to determine guidelines for Authority members having regard to conflict of interest, be received and appended as Schedule "C" of these Minutes; AND FURTHER THAT Bill 14, "An Act to Revise the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act" , be distributed to members at this time. CARRIED; NEW BUSINESS APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES Res 173 Moved by: W Sutherland Seconded by G.B Sinclair THAT the present provision of the Conservation Authorities Act with respect to appointment of members to conservation authorities be retained by municipalities; AND FURTHER THAT this motion be forwarded to the appropriate municipalities for endorsement. ON A RECORDED VOTE, VOTING "YEA" - 29 VOTING "NAY" - NIL M W.H Biggar M.J Breen J.A. Bryson D.G Fleet Mrs. F. Edna Gardner Mrs. Florence Gell Robert Gillespie S.T. Griffiths Mrs. Lois Hancey Gavin Henderson W R. Herridge Don Jackson W.J. Kelly E.V. Kolb David Lacey Dr T.H Leith S A Macpherson F.J. Kechnie F.R. Perkins John Rupke J.S. Scott G.B. Sinclair M.M. Smith, QC M M R. Stewart Mrs. Betty Sutherland William Sutherland Mrs. H.D Sutter C E Thompson Dr. W M. 'l'ove 11 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY; FOOD SERVICE Mr Kolb invited any members having corrunents on the Authority food service over the past five years to forward these to T E. Barber, Administrator, Information and Education Division. -9- A-70 Res t74 Hoved by S A Macpherson -- Seconded by M W H Biggar THAT appreciation be expressed to the Reeve and Council of the Township of Mono and to all concerned with the excellent arrangements and kind hospitality for today's meeting. CARRIED; TERMINATION On motion, the meeting terminated 82 10 07 1300, and was followed by lunch hosted by the Township of Mono Mrs. F Gell, Vice-Chairman W.E Jones Acting Chairman Secretary-Treasurer KC. THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 1983 PRELIMINARY BUDGET ESTIMATES Authority October 7, 1982 tIl (') ::I: t'l t:l c:: t" t'l > > I .... ...... THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CON3ERVATION AUTHORITY 1983 PRELIMINARY BUDGET ESTIMATES I N D E X Pagels) Pagels) BUDGET REPORT & PROVINCIAL FUNDING 1-1-8 Erosion Control - York - Program Description V-lO MUNICIPAL LEVIES AND BASIS OF APPORTIONMENT 11-1-3 - Program Budget Summary V-II Erosion Control - Durham BUDGET SUMMARY 111-1-4 - Program Descriptio~ V-12 - Program Budget Summary V-13 THE =INANCE & ADMINISTRATION DIVISION Planning & Remedial Measures - Division Description - Goals & Responsibilities IV-l - Program Description V-14 - 1982 Achievements - 1983 Priorities IV-2 - Program Budget Summary V-15-16 - Division Budget Summary IV-3 Maintenance - Small Dams, Channels, Erosion _ Administration - Program Description IV-4 Control Structures - Program Description V-17 - Progr~m Budget Summary IV-5 - Program Budget Summary V-18 - Ge~eral Expenses - Program Description IV-6 River Forecascing Operations - Maincenance - Program Budget Summary IV-7 Water Control Structures - Budget Revenue Detail IV-8 - Program Description V-19 _ Property Acauisition - Maintenance & - Program Budget Summary V-20 ~lanagement - Program Description IV-9 - Waterfront - Division Budget Summary V-21 - Program Budget Summary IV-IO Administration - Program Description V-22 _ Vehicle & Equipment Purc~ases - New & - Program Budget Summary V-23 Replacement - Program Description IV-II Shoreline Management - Program Description V-24 - Program Budget Summary IV-12 - Program Budget Summary V-25 Lake Ontario Waterfront Development THE WATER RESOURCE DIVISION - Program Description V-26 _ D~v~s~on Descript~on - Goals & Responsibilities V-I - Program Budget Summary V-27 - 1982 Achievements - 1983 Priorities V-2 _ Flood Control - Division B~uset Summary V-3 THE CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT DIVISION Administration - Program Description V-4 - Division Description - Goals & Responsibilities VI-1 - Program Budget Summary V-5 - 1982 Achievements - 1983 Priorities VI-2 Erosion Control - Metropolitan Toronto - Division Budget Summary V~-3 - - Program Description V-6 - Program Administration - Program Description VI-4 - Program Budget Summary V-7 - Program Budget Summary VI-5 Erosion Control - Peel - Watershed Recreation - Planning - Program Description v-a - Program Description VI-6 - Program Budget Summary V-9 - Program Budget Summary VI-7 - 2 - page{s) page{s) THE CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT DIVISION contd - Community Relations - Information - I'latershed Recreation General - Program Descr~pt~on VII-6 Development - Program Description VI-B - Program Budget Summary VII-7 - Program Budget Summary VI-9 Resource Management Programs Operations and Naintenance - Program Description VII-B - Program Description VI-10 - Program Budget Summary VII-9 - Program Budget Summary VI-11 Planning/Marketing Analysis Program Budget Revenue Detail VI-l2 - Program Description VII-IO - Conservation Land Management - Program Budget Summary VII-11 Land Management - Program Description VI-13 - Community Relations - Conservation Education - Program Budget Summary VI-14 Supervision, Operations & Maintenance Conservation Planning - Program Description VII -12 - Program Description VI-15 - Program Budget Surrunary VII-13 - Program Budget Summary VI-16 Kortright - Program Description VIr-14 Glen Haffy Fish Rearing - Program Budget Surrunary VII -15 - Program Description VI-17 Development - Program Description VII-16 - Program Budget Summary VI-IB - Program Budget Surrunary VII-17 Non-Revenue Properties - Program Description VI-19 THE HISTORICAL SITES DIVISION - Program Budget Summary VI-20 - Division Descr~ption - Goals & Responsibilities VIII-l - 19B2 Achievements - 19B3 Priorities VI II - 2 - Division Budget Surrunary VIII-3 -" Hed ta';1e THE INFOR~~TION & EDUCATION DIVISION Adm~n~stration - Program Description VII I-4 - Division Cescription - GOr\ Ls _ Responsibilities VII-l - Program Budget SUl!1Il1ary VII 1-5 - 1982 Achievements - 1983 Priorities VII-2 B1a~k Creek Pioneer Village - Operations & - Division Budget Summary VII-3 Maintenance - Program Description VIII-6 - Program Administration - Program Description VI I -4 - Program Budget Sur.unary VIII-7 - Program Budget Surrunary VII-5 Education Program - Program Description VIII-8 - Program Budget Surrunary VIII-9 Capital Development - Program Description VIII-IO - Program Budget Summary VII 1-11 Page I-l 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES Authority Purpose, Achievements and Objectives The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority adopted a comprehensive Watershed Plan on December 5, 1980, to establish long-range goals in nine program areas specific to the 3467 square kilometres within Authority jurisdiction The adoption of the Plan is in compliance with the direction of the Conservation Authorities Act to undertake a program designed to further the conservation, restoration, development and management of natural resources and of the Province of Ontario to study and investigate the watershed and prepare and file with its member municipalities and the Minister of natural Resources, a Wat.ershed Plan The rlatershed Plan has been filed with, and concurred in by, the Authority's member municipa1ites and the Director, Central Region, Ministry of Natural Resources The Authority, in the Plan, has identified t~e river valleys, the Lake Ontario shoreli'1e and the headwaters of the Oak Ridges inter lobate moraine and the Niagara Escarpment as the major resources to which its programs are applied T'1.e Watershed Plan is comprised of nine (9 ) interrelated programs The basic requirement of the Authority is to provide protection to human life and property from the hazards of flooding and erosion The Flood Control Program and three complementary programs, Erosion and Sediment Control, Storm Water Management and Conservation Land Management, establish the means to accomplish this objective and recognize the relationships between rural and urban drainage. erosion and sedimentation, and flooding Flood Control Program - Provides for remedial measures, land acquisition and the administration of regulatory measures to ma~nta~n flood plains unobstructed to ensure the passage of flood flows Erosion and Sediment Control Program - Provides for corrective works and the administration of regulatory measures to protect life and property Storm Water Management Program - Establishes a basis for co-operative action by the Authority and its member municipalities w~th respect to water management problems and the preparation of mast.er drainage plans Conservation Land ~anagement Program - Promotes conservation on private and pubL.ic lands by providing reforestation, habitat improvement, st.ream improvement and a conservation planning service Land Acquisition Program - Provides for the acquisition of flood plain and valley lands, waterfront lands and environmentally significant lands to ensure proper conservation land management The hectares or land acquired by the Authority are being managed to achieve the objectives of the t'latershed Plan Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Proaram - This program has two components, Shoreline Management to reduce the hazards of flood~ng and eros~on at the land/lake interface, and Development to create water-oriented recreation opportunitie3 82 09 28 Page I-2 Watershed Recreation Program - Enables the development and operations of recreation areas for public use and enjoyment, a valuable anc~llary benefit on conservation lands Heritage Conservacion Program - Recognizes the special contribution that an historical perspective gives to the understanding o~ resource management Community Relations Program - Establishes the means by which the Authority can communicate with the community in order to gai understanding and acceptance of its conservation programs The 1983 Budget Estimates derive from the Watershed Plan reflecting a strong orientation to Water and Related Land Management Programs and e~phasizing planning, regulatory and environmentally acceptable solutions to water ~anagement problems. The Budget proposals also address a number of administrative matters - disposition of municipal levies on hand - provision for gapping, set at 1% of full-time wages, salaries and benefits - identification and allocation of interest income The adoption of this Budget will not enable the Authority to maintain the level of service provided to the community in 1982 and will not enable the Watershed Plan objectives to be implemented at the rate anticipated on adoption Format of Presentation The 1983 Budget Estimates are based on the same program management format as the 1982 budget format The format is designed to idencify more clearly the programs adopted by the Authority in its Watershed Plan In addition, the budget estimates are organized into management units to more clearly identify and manage the Authority programs The principles of program budget management have been used to develop the 1983 Budget Estimates There are five major types of Provincial grants available through the Ministry of Natural Resources to Conservation Authorities 1 Administration 2 Water and Related Land Management 3 Conservation and Recreation Land Management 4 Special Projects and Programs 5 Supplementary Grants (not applicable to MTRCA) 82 09 28 Page I-3 Authority Proqrams I Finance and Administration (a) Program Administration (b) General Expense (c) Property Acquisition and Maintenance and Management 2 Water and Related Land Management - Flood Control (a) ?rogram Administration (b) Erosion and Sediment Control - Metropolitan Toronto - Peel, York and Durham (c) Flood Control - Planning and Remedial Measures - River forecasting operations, Main~enance of Water Control Structures - Maintenance, Small Dams, Channels, Erosion Control Sites 3 Special Projects - Lake Ontario Waterfront Development (a) Program Administration (b) Waterfron~ Development (c) Shoreline Management Remedial works, and management of works 4 Conserva~ion Land Management (a) Program Administration (b) Watershed Recreation - Planning - Conservation Area Development - Operations and Maintenance (c) Conservation Land Management - Planning - Conservation Management - Conservation Management (Fish Rearing) - Operations and Maintenance 82 09 28 Page !-4 5 Information and Education (a) Program Administration (b) Community Relations - Information - General - Resource Management - Planning, Market Analysis - Conservation Education - Supervision, Operations, Maintenance - Supervision, Operations, Maintenance (Kortright) (c} Conservation Education Development 6 Historical Sites (a) Program Administration (b) Operations and Maintenance (c) Capital Development Expenditures on administration, operations and maintenance, and current programs comprise the Authority's General Levy on all participating municipalities apportioned on the basis of equalized assessment as supplied by the Province of Ontario Expenditures on capital programs are financed as a Capital Levy on municipalities based on levies designated in specific projects Certain expenditures from special revenues and levy on hand are recommended Land Acquisition Project, 1982-1984 This project was adopted by the Authority and approved by the municipalities on the basis of a 55% grant and all meITber ~unicipalities benefiting in proportion to their equalized assessment The Authority plans an expenditure of $550,000 for 1983, of which $247,500, being the municipal share, will be funded from levy monies on hand Lake Ontario Waterfront Develupment Project, 1983 ~is project was adopted by the Authority and approved by the municipalities on the basis of a 50% grant and all member municipalities benefiting in the same proportion as that determined for the 1977-1981 project We have written to the Ministry of Natural Resources requesting that a project be approved for 1983 in the amount of $2,800,000 82 09 28 Page I-5 Projects for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the Regional Municipalities of Peel, York and Durham, 1982-l984 These projects were adopted by the Authority and approved by the municipalities on the basis of a 55% grant and each municipality benefiting for the works carried out in the municipality The annual municipal funding requirement is Metropolitan Toronto 173,250 Peel 13,500 York 9,000 Durham 2,250 S 198,000 These projects are budgeted for in 1983 as submitted Project for Chan~el Improvements - Main Humber River, Villaqe of Bolton and Town of Caledon, 1982-1983 All approvals are in hand for the 1982 project and, due to increased costs, an addendum to the project has been submitted for approval In both instances, the project will be funded by the Province of Ontario The 1983 Levy T~e apport~cnment of the 1983 muni~ipal levy is based on the 'discounted' equalized assessment in the Authority, in accordance with information supplied to ~ll Conservation Authorities by the Ministry of Natural Resources In accordance with ~he policy adopted by the Authority, the Regional Municipalities of Durham, Peel and York will be levied an amount equal to 100% of the 1982 taxes paid by the Authority for revenue producing conservation areas within those municipalities Within Metropolitan Toronto, Authority lands are not subject to taxation ?rovi~cial Funding The Provincial grant structure used in these estimates is based on the following approved percentages: Administration 50% Water and Related Land Management 55% Conserva~ivn and Recreation Land Management 50% Waterfront Plan 50% 82 09 2B Page 1-6 The Authority will attempt to obtain approval for the following level of funding from the Province of Ontario to finance the programs set forth in the 1983 Budget Estimates Rate of Grant TOTAL ADM1N1STR.l\TION A 1 to A6 inclusive 50 WATER & RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT II (5) Operations & Mtce W/C Structures DH 1 234 55 (10) Community Relations 55 ( 11) Taxes, 1nsurancer Rent, Utilities, etc 55 SUB-TOTAL 82 09 28 Page I-7 Rate of Grant TOTAL C~.PITAL Interim Water & Related Land Management Project - Studies & Environmental Assessments 55 - Water Mgt Regulations, etc. 55 - Conservation Services 55 - COr.lIr,u:1i ty Information 55 - Floodwarning System 55 - Headwater Land Acquisition 55 - ~aster Plan, Va1ley1and Acquisition 55 - Flood Control Channels 55 - Erosion Control and Bank Stab 55 SUB-TOTAL Community Relations Development 55 Keating Project 55 SUB-TOTAL TOTAL WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT 82 09 28 Page 1-8 Rate of Grant TOTAL CONSERVATION & RECREATION LAND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT III (l) (3) Conservation Areas & Waterfront Areas 50 Staff Salaries, Expenses Information & Interpretive Programs (5 ) (6) Rent, Utilities, Taxes, Insurance 50 SUB-TOTAL CAPITAL Conservation Areas Development 50 TOTAL CONSERVATION & RECREATION LAND MANAGEMENT *LaKe Ontario Waterfront 50 TOTAL FUNDING $5,154,180 * Special Project 82 09 28 Page ~ 'mE MEI'ROroLITAN 'roRONro AND P.ffiICN CCNSERVATION AlJI'HORITY' BASIS OF AFroRl'IONMENT - MlNICIPAL IEVY BASED CN 'mE LATEST B:ltlALIZED ASS~ FIGURES (DISCCUNl'ED) AVAIlABLE'ro '!HE AT.JIH)RI'!Y** Total % of Equa1ize:l Population Fqualize:l Mmicipali ty AssesSIrel'lt Total In M.micipality Assessrrent In Authority In Authori ty Pcpulation Authority 1,000'5 of $'5 I I 1,000'5 of $'5 I I I I I Ad j ala 'l'c::Jwnshi p 132,801 I 8 I 10,624 3,756 300 I Durham, Regional M.Jnicipality of 2,000,407 I * I 1,600,183 71 , 972 57,638 I MetroIXlli tan 'Ibronto 67,349,809 J 100 I 67,349,808 2,143,493 2,143,493 I M:Jno Township 151,286 I 5 I 7,564 4,021 201 I Peel, Regional Municipality of 15,162,814 I * I 6,488,721 464,491 201,152 I York, Regional Municipality of 7,01l,303 I * I 5,999,673 179, 011 l47,532 I 91,888,420 I 81,45fi,573 2,866,744 2,550,316 I I I ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL MUNICIPALITIES * I I I I I I Durham, Regional Municipality of I Ajax Town 667,227 I 86 573,815 24,927 21,437 ?ickeri:1g '!'own 997,189 I 95 947,330 I 35,872 34,078 Uxbridge Town 415,991 I 19 79,038 I 1l,173 2,l23 2, 080,407 I 1,600,183 I 71 , 972 57,638 I I Peel, Regional MJnicipality of I I Brampton, City of 4,242,108 I 63 I 2,672,528 I 140,649 88,609 Mississat:ga, City of 9,955,434 I 33 3,285,293 I 298,C45 98,355 Cale:lon Town 965,272 I 55 530,900 I 25,797 14,188 l5,l62,8l4 I 6,488,72l I 464,491 201,152 I I York, Regional Municipality of I I .l\urora ToNn 416,250 I 4 16,650 I 15,792 632 1-Urk.'l-jam To.vn I 2,759,144 I 100 2,759,144 I 73, 063 73, 063 Richrrond Hill Town I ::',189,312 I 99 1,177,419 I 36,599 36,233 I Vaughan Town I 1,572,656 I 100 1,572,656 I 25,C41 25,C41 I Whi tchurch-Stouffville Town I 473,499 I 43 203,605 I 13,436 5,777 I King 'IO.o.nship I 600,442 I 45 I 270,199 I 15, 080 ! 6,786 I I 7,01l,303 I I 5,999,673 I l79,01l I 147,532 I ** As provide:l by the Ministry of Nat"""al Resources fbr 1982. 'll1e 1983 figures will be USe:l \tohen they are made available. 82 09 28 '!HE MEI'ROFOLITAN 'ID00Nr0 AND REXllrn a:NSmvATICN AUl'HORI'IY Page II-2 1982 LEVY APPORl'IOOMENT USING DISCOONl'ED mJALIZED ASSESS1ENI'* General and Capital Levy veterfront Project excluding Waterfront Discounted Assessment DiSCOlmted Assessment Prop:>rtionate 95% Metro/~harn Proportionate in Watershed Factor 5% Mjala/~/Pee1/York Factor . Mjala 4,910 00009736520 4,910 ??oo2942090 Durham Ajax 325,556 Pickering 505,242 Uxbridge 39,031 869,829 01724869179 869,829 01963529832 Metro 41, 214- 459 81728190303 41,214,459 93036470168 Mono 4,298 00008522925 4,298 ??oo2575378 Peel Brampton 1,744,171 Mississ- auga 2,183,604 Ca1edon 318,792 4,246,567 08420933924 4,246,567 02544559194 York Aurora 11 , 141 Markham 1,823,893 P.ichrrond - Hill 785,157 Vaughan 1,179,969 IVhh ' c."'1- St I ville 126,929 King 161,542 4,088 1';:"1 08107747149 4,088,631 02449923338 50,428,694 1 00000000ooo 50,428,694 1 OOOOOOOOOOO * As provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources for 1982 '!he 1983 figures will be used \then they are made available. 82 09 28 - Page 11-3 '!HE MEI'ROPOLITAN 'roR:.NIQ AND REGICN ~'ffiVATICN AIJIH)R!'IY APPORI'ICNMENl' CF 1983 LEVIES GEN'ffiAL PR)JEI:TS - WAT'ffiSHED PIAN PR)JEI:TS - WAT'ffiFR:Nr 198 3 GENERAL LEVY WAT'ffiSHID ~ SPECIAL WATERFRONT Before Tax Total Inc 11982 General rnc I Capital Capital I Highland Visitors' Guild I Developnent Shoreline Tax Adjust MjustJnent Tax Mjust I Tax Mjustment I All Ben. Ben .Mun Total I Creek Centre 1m I etc Mana~ement $ $ $ I $ I $ $ $ I $ $ -'-1 $ Mjala 386 386 1 375 I 24 24 I I 34 I I I 1 Durham 68,335 41,465 109,800 I 106,512 I 4,269 2,250 6,519 I 11,462 1 22,630 I I I I Metro I I I I Torooto 3,237,853 3,237,853 I 3,143,693 I 202,277 173,250 375,527 167,500 250,000 I 1,072,245 247,500 I I I I t-b1o 337 337 I 328 I 21 21 I I 30 I I I I Peel 333,615 98,751 432,366 I 418,957 I 20,842 13, 500 34,342 I I 29 , 326 I 1 I I York 321.207 28.074 349,281 I 338, 746 I 20,067 9,000 29,067 I I 28,235 I I I I I I 247,500 198,000 445,500 I I 3,961. 733 168,290 4,130,023 I 4,008,611 1(247,500) (247,500) 167,500 11,462 250,0001 1,152,500 247, 500 OOI'ES 'ro LEVY SHEEr 1 a) $247.500 of 1982 capital surplus has been credited to the 1983 Watershed Projects, capital all benefiting rm.mi.cipalities. b) The Highland Creek project has been included with Metro, the benefitirx) rm.mi.cipality, for an estimated experoiture in 1983 of $67,500. c) The Guild Inn takeover is estimated to cost Metro, the benefiting municipality, awroxirnately $250,000 in 1983. 2. 25 Year Project. Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitors Centre 'lbis project is to be financed as follows: Manber M..micipalities I Special Ccntributiat $ 588",538 Regional r-tmicipality of I:m"harn 11,462 Wintario 600,000 Metro 'lbra1to and Region 0:nservatia1 Foundatia1 600,000 $1,800,000 82.10 19 Page .!!!:!. r..mmD: OJrrent Items - ## Capital Itans - 00 BULGEI' SllM1ARY I I I I I I , 1983 BULGEI' I SOURCES OF FIN1IN::INJ I 1982 BuroEI' 1982 ACI'UALS I I ACTIVI'lY I I NEI' I PROv:m::IAL MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I , EXPENDITURES I REVElmES EXPTh'DITURES I GRAN!' IEJY I OI'HER 1 EXPENDITURES I R...."VENUES I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES! I I $ I $ $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I I FINAN:E & AL'MINISTRATICN I I I I I ! I I I , I I I I I I I I I , ~inistration ##1 1,379,280 I 1,379,280 I 689,640 689,640 I I 1,313,560 I I I I I General Expense ## I 265,000 I 172,000 93,000 I 18,000 I 75,0001 217,500 I 160,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I IProperty Acquisition - 1 I I I I I I I I I Maintenance Management I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I , I I 1 I IF1ccd Control I I I I I I I I I I ~~ ~cquisition 00 550,000 I I 550,000 I 302,500 24 7, 500 I 500,000 I , I I I I I 1 I I , I I IWaterfront Hazard I I I I I I I I I Land Acquisition 00 325,000 I I 325,000 I 162,500 162,500 I 200,000 I I I I , I I I 1 I I I I IWa;:erfront I I I I ! , I I I Open Space Land Acqu I n 00 300,000 I I 300,000 I 150,000 150,000 , 200,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Legal Costs I I I I I I I I , Regulat.ion Ei'lrorcenent u 11,000 I I 11 , 000 I 6,050 4,950 I 15,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'Water & Related I I I I I I I I I 1 I Taxes ##1 262,000 1 I 262,000 I 144,100 117,900 I I 234,000 I I I I I Insur:mce ##1 l4, 300 , I 14, 300 I 7,865 6,435 I I 12,800 I I I I I I I I I I , , I I I ICanserJation & Recreation I I I I I I I I I I I To...'Ces ## I 67, 200 I , 67,200 I 33,600 33,600 I I GO,OOO 1 I 1 I , I=urance ul 13,700 I I 13,700 I 6,850 6,850 I I 12,200 I I 1 i 1 I I I I I I I I I I 'Vehicle & Fquiprent I I I I I I I I I I I t>u=chases ul 280,730 I I 280,730 I 13, 600 I 267,130 I 242,025 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 82 09.27 Page 1II-2 BUIXiEI' stJM.IARY' I I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOEI' I 9JURCES CF FINAtol::rnG I 1982 BUIXiEI' I 1982 ACTUALS I ! ACrIVITY I I I NEI' I PROVINCIAL I MUNICIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPmDI'ItlRES I GRlINl' I LE\Y I OIHER EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES I EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES I I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I vlATER RESOURCES - FLOOD I I I I I I I I I I <XNI'ROL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Program Mrninistration ## 743, 663 I I 743,663 I 394,856 I 337,686 I 11 , 121 680,640 I I I I Erosion - Metro 00 396,500 I 11 , 500 I 385,000 I 211,750 I 173,250 I 415,000 I 15,000 I I I Erosion - Peel 00 35,600 I 5,600 I 30, 000 I 16,500 I 13,500 I 32,000 I 2,000 I I I Erosion - York 00 23 , 500 I 3,500 I 20,000 I 11 , 000 1 9,000 I 21,500 I 1,500 I I I :xosiop. - Durha'll 00 5,000 I I 5,000 I 2,750 I 2,250 I 5,300 I 300 I I Fleed Centrol - I I I I I I I I Planning ## 58,500 I I 58,500 I 32,175 I 26,325 I I 171,680 I I Ranedial Works 00 1,285,000 I I 1,285,000 I 612,600 I 67,500 I 604,900 I 925,000 I I Fleed Centro1 - I I I I I I I I Mainte!'.ance I I I I I I I I Srrall DalTIS and I I I I I I I I Olannels HI 258,000 I I 258,000 I 141,900 I 116,100 I I 155,000 I I F1eed Control - I I I I I I I I I River Forecasting ##1 127,261 I I 127,261 I 69,993 I 57,268 I I 121,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IHATER RESOURCES - I I I I I I I 1 I I \'lATEP.FROb."'I' I I I I I I I I 1 ! Administration 001 298,739 I I 298, 739 I 149,369 I 149,370 I I 318,786 I I I Lake Cntario Waterfront 00 I 1,531,261 I 150,000 I 1,381,261 690,631 I 690,630 I I 1,440,671 I I I I I Shore1be l<'anagement 001 495,000 I I 495,000 247,500 I 247,500 I I 640,543 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CCNSERVATION lAND I I I I I I I I I I I I ~GEMENI' I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I Program AOministration ##1 690,864 I I 690,864 345,432 I 345,432 I I 644,300 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 82 09 28 Page ~ BurGEI' SlJM.1ARY I I I I I I I I 1983 BULGEI' I SOURCES OF FINAN::ING I 1982 BULGEI' I 1982 ACI'UAIS I I ACTIVI'lY I I I NEI' I ProVINCIAL I MtNICIPAL I I I ! I I I I EXPENDI'IURES I REVTh1UES I EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' I LEVY' I arnm I EXPTh'DI'IURES I REVENUES I EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I IWatershed Recreation I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I ! P1annil'g #;; I 75,000 I I 75,000 I 37,500 I 37,500 I 120,000 I I I I I eev"lop;rent ii# I 223, 110 I I 223,110 I 100,575 I 106,065 16,470 I 627,000 1 I I I I Operations ##1 2,135,600 I 1,016,000 I 1,119,600 I I l,119,600 1 2,203,700 11,000,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ICalservation LarxJ I I I I I I I I I I I Management HI 420,070 I 134,000 I 286,070 I 139, 764 I 146,306 I 329,000 I 44,0001 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Th?OR.'1A'I'ICN & EDUC.~TICN I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i Program Administration it# I 330,665 I I 330,665 1 165,333 I 165,332 I 268,385 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I 1 I I I I I I iCcmmunity Relations Inform I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I SU?FDrt ##1 63,197 I I 63,197 I 31, 598 I 31 , 599 I I 59,990 I I I I I Ger.era1 ;;# I 81,500 I I 81 , 500 I 43,925 I 37,575 I I 74,100 I I I I I Resource ~1gt Programs ## 1 11,000 I I 11,000 I 6,050 I 4,950 I I 10,000 I I I I I P1arxUng/Market Ana1ysis## I ge,243 I I 90,243 I 90,243 I I 125,000 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ICcmm~ity ~e1a~ions Educn I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I St:pp::>rt if# I 35,108 I I 35,108 17,554 I 17, 554 I I 32,117 I I I I I Supervision Operation I I I I I I I I I I I & ~1."lintenance ## 1 l,037,683 I 900,900 I 136,783 58, 780 I 78,003 I I 1,037,764 I 873,8001 1 I I Supervision Operation I I I I I 1 I I I I I & Maintenance - I I I I I I I I I I I Kor-..right ## I 615,413 I 339,100 I 276,313 19, l40 I 120,460 I 136,713 I 393,000 I 232,1501 I I , I Deve10prnent #;; I 100,000 I I 100,000 I I 100,000 I 180,500 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 82 10 05 Page III-4 BUOOEl' SUM-lARY I I I I I I I I 1983 But'GEl' I OOURCES OF F~:rn:; I 1982 Burx;ET I 1982 lIC'I'llALS I I ;'.cTIVI'IY I I I NET I PFDVL.-.cIAL ,MUNICIPAL I I I I I I I 1 I EXPENDITURES I REVmUES I EXPmDITURES I GRAN!' UNf I OIRER 1 EXPENDI'ItJRES I REVmUES I EXPmDI'IURES I REVENUES I I I $ I $ I $ I $ $ 1 $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I I I I I I I I I I I I I lUSTORICAL SITES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Progr2Ill Administration it I 280,800 I I 280,800 I 104,400 176,400 I I 248,700 I I I I 1 Operations & I I I f I I 1 I I I I ~~ntenance ##1 1,567,200 1 1,125,000 1 442,200 I 240, 200 I 202,0001 1,492,000 11,040,5001 I I I Educational Programs ##1 147,950 I 163,500 1 (15,550) I (15,550) I 1 174,450 I 179,7001 I 1 I Capital Developrent 001 2,270,000 I I 2,270,000 I 12,270,0001 1,930,000 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a.JR..~ 1 11,386,037 I 3,850,500 I 7,535,537 I 2,597,080 4,130,023 I 808,4341 11,255,411 13,530,1501 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I ! CAPITAL I 7,515,600 I 170,600 I 7,345,000 I 2,557,lOO 1,665,500 13,122,4001 6,628,800 I 18,8001 I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I 1983 TOI'AL I 18,901,637 I 4,021,100 I 14,880,537 1 5,154,180 1 5,795,523 13,930,8341 17,884,211 13,548,950 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1982 TC1l'AL l7,884,211 I 3,548,950 I 14,335,261 I 4,964,435 I 5,56l,611 13,809,2151 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I i I I 1 f I I I 1 , I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 82 09 28 Page IV-l 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES THE FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION DIVISION To support goals of the Authority, the responsibilities of the Division encompass financial management and monitoring of financial procedures, compilation of budget, multi-year forecast and provision of such financial data and reporting as required. ~he Division is responsible for acquisitions and management of property, management of Authority legal services, management of Authority's administration offices and grounds, and provision of administrative services to all divisions of the Authority and management of Authority personnel services The Secretary-Treasurer is required to record the resolutions, decisions and other proceedings of the Authority and to keep the originals of all minutes of the Authority and its boards and committees 82 09 22 Pa~V-.c. 1982 ACHIEVEMENTS the Accounting Section continued the development and implementation of a computer-based financial management and budget reporting system a Personnel Officer was employed, reporting directly to the General Manager che updating of the Authority's Personnel Policies Manual was completed 1983 PRIORITIES In general, the objectives for 1983 relate to further improvement in performance for services presently provided, and provision of new and expanded services within the available resources In particular, the Accounting Section will continue to deve1cp and improve ~inancial reporting procedures, including revision of purchasing policy to conform to computer account.ing 82 09 22 Page IV-3 1983 BUOOEl' ESTIMM'ES DIVISICN Finance & Administration I I I I I I 1983 BUOOEI' 1 roJRCES OF FINh~IN3 I 1982 BUOOET I 1982 A...'""!'UAlS I I PRCGRA.'1 I , NEI' I PROVINCIAL I r-ltNICIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REVTh'UES I EXPE!IDI'IURES I GRANl' 1 WJ':l I OI'HER I EXPENDITURES I RE\mIUES I EXP~I?~~ I ~"ENUES I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ ! ~ I :;. I ?r~am I I I I I I I I I J I I I p~iscration 1,379,280 I I 1,379,280 I 689, 640 I 689 , 640 I , 1,313,560 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! IGeneral Expenses 265, 000 I 172,000 I 93,000 I - I 18,000 I 75,000 217,500 I 160,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I !PrOF€rty I I I I I I I I I I .~.o::rc.isi tion - I I I I I I I I I ! l.:aintenance & I I I I I I I I I I I ,"!anagernent I 1,543,200 I 1,543,200 I 813,465 I 482,235 I 247,500 1,234,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IVehicle 0. I I I I I I I I I I Equiprrent I I I I I I I I I I Purchases I 280,730 I 280,730 I I 13,600 I 267,130 242,025 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDI'AL I 3,468,210 I 172,000 I 3,296,210 I 1,503,105 I I, 203,475 I 589,630 I 3,007,005 I 16O,000 I I I 82 09 27 Page .!y=! 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Finance and Administration PROGRAM Administration PURPOSE To provide the administratLve and financial services of the Authority 1983 OBJECTIVES - Continuation of general administration and financial support services for all Authority programs, as well as salaries and expenses for the Chairman and Vice Chairman The salaries of the General Manager, Deputy General Manager, Secretary-Treasurer, associated secretarial staff, and the staff of the Finance and Administration Division, which include? Land Acquisition, Personnel, Finance and general office administration, are charged to this program The payment of members' per diem and kilometers and the Authority meeting expenses are included in the budget The cleaning and maintenance of the administration headquarters is also funded FUNDING This is a shared program, financed by a grant from the Province of Ontario and the general levy on all participating municipalities FINANCIAL COM~ENTS In 1983, as in 1982, employee benefits and Administrators' salaries are charged to each program Salary increases are provided for on the basis of 5% economic OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Members Supplies & Fringe Salaries Transportation & Equipment Salaries Benefic::. & Expenses Corrununication Services (Office) TOTAL 651,175 96,505 93,450 148,600 319,550 70,000 1,379,280 82 09 27 Page IV-5 1983 BUOOEl' ~TES DIVISICN Finance and Mninistration Program: Administration I I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' I 9JURCES OF FINtlN:IN:i I 1982 BUOOEl' I 1982 ACI'UALS I 1 ACTIVIT'{ I I I NEI' I PROVTh'CIAL , ~CIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPTh'DITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' I lEV'{ OIHER 1 EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I I I I I I I I I I I I I Salaries I 651,175 I I 651,175 I 325.588 I 325, 587 I 655, n2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I iFringe ~efits &1 I I I I I I I I I Seperation ~ 96. 505 I I 96,505 I 48,252 I 48,253 I 114.323 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I Me7bers, Salaries I r I I I I I I I I .: ~"P€r.ses ! 93,450 I I 93,450 I 46, 725 I 46,725 I 89,325 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Trans:r:ortat.ion & I I 1 I I I r I I I Carrm.nication I 148,600 I I 148,600 I 74, 300 I 74, 300 I 155.000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sel-vices I 318,550 I I 318,550 I 159,275 I 159,275 I 218,140 I I I I I I I ! I I I I r I ! ScY9plies (Office) I 60,000 I I 60, 000 ! 30,000 I 30,000 1 I 62.000 I I I I I i I I I 1 I I I I I I ! E'q.:ipmt (Office) I 10,000 I I 10,000 I 5,000 I 5,000 I I 8,000 I I I I ! , I I I i I I I I I I i lSa:et: I I I I I I I I I I I I I Carmi t t.ee I 1,000 I I 1,000 I seo I 500 I I 1,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IB::.e:'.Ilia1 I I I I I I I I I I I Confere:1ce I I I I I I 10,000 I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 'roI'.:\L I 1,379,280 I 1,379,280 I 689,640 I 689,640 I I 1,313,560 I I I I 82 09 27 Page IV-6 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Finance and Administration PROGRAM General Expenses PURPOSE To provide for a variety of support costs for which no Provincial Grant is available 1983 OBJECTIVES - To fund the maintenance of revenue producing properties and other general maintenance - To fund the public liability insurance on vehicles and equipment - To fund the Authority's share of vehicles and equipment - To fund taxes and insurance for revenue producing properties FUNDING Since no provision for these items is made in the Ministry of Natural Resources grant structure, the funding is entirely from I:!unicipal levy and program revenues consisting of rental income It should be noted that no provision has been made for the contingency of a deficit in 1982 FI~ANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Services Interest & Wages Utilities & Rents Costs Insurance Taxes TOTAL $ 10,000 24, 000 73,000 30,000 23,000 105,000 265,000 82 08 09 Page TIl-7 1983 BUOOEl' ESTIM\TES DIVISlOO Finance and Administration Program: General Ecpenses I I I I I I I I 1983 BTJCGEI' I s:JlJRCFS CF FIN:AN::IN; I 1982 BmxiEl' , 1982 .~AIS I I ACI'IVITY' I I I ~ I POOVlliCIAL M'JITCIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I R...l>\lENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRANl' LEVi I <miFR I EXPENDI'IURES , REVENUES I EXPENDI'I'URES I RE-VENUES I ! ! $ 1$ ! $ I $ $: $ I $ 1$ I $ I $ I iAu-:.hori-::y & Staff I , I I I I I I I I i ~!eetinqs and I I I' i I I I I I I ?u."1~ions 1 30,000! I 30,000 I 30,000 I I 26,500 I I I I i I I I I I I I I : I iVe11icles & Equipc.1 : ! I ! 1 I I I I I Exoenses ! 5,000 I I 5,000 I 5,000 I , 5,000 I I I I I - ! i I : I I I I I I I ISta::f & Authority' I I I I I I I I , I I ~!erl::ers Long I ! I I I I I I I I I i Service & I I I I I , , I I I I I Retirement I 6,000 I I 6,000 I I 6,000 I I 6,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Insurance , 16,000 I I 16,000 I I 16,000 I I 14,000 I I I I ! I I I I I I I !:::nteres1: I 30,000, I 30,000' 1 (45,000) I 75,000 It! I ! i , , I I I I! !Miscellanecus! 6.000 1 I 6,000 I I 6,000 I 6,000 I I ! I f I I I I I I : Ren'-..al Pmoerties ; I I I I I I : '1al.n 1:enanc~ 60 , 000 I I 60 . OCO I I I 60, 000 I I IReai.1:v Taxes 105,000 i I 105,000 I I I 94.000 I I II!'.sur~ce 7,000 I I 7,000 ii' 6,000 I I I Rental. illcane I ::.72 me i (172, (00) I I I 160,000 I , 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDl'AL 265,000 I 172,009_ I 93,000 I I 18,000 75,000 I 217,500 160,000 I I 82.00 30 Page IV-8 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Finance and Administration Revenue Detail General Expenses 1983 BUDGET 1982 BUDGET I I I ESTIMATED I I I ACTIVITY I REVENUE ACTIVITY I REVENUES 11982 ACTUALS I I I I I I $ I I I I I I I Rental Income on Authority- I I I I owned Real Property 1 172,000 I 160,000 I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 172,000 I I 160,000 I 82 08 09 Page IV-9 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Finance and Administration PROGRA.~ Property Acquisition, Maintenance and Management PURPOSE To provide for ~he funding required for carrying out the purchase of lands under the Interim Water and Land Management Project and under the Waterfront Project To provide for costs associated with taxes on non-revenue producing areas and liability insurance on Authority lands under Water and Related Land Management. Programs To provide for costs associated with taxes on non-revenue producing areas and liability insurance on Authority lands and facilities under Conservation and Recreation Land Management Programs. To provide for legal costs associated with the Authority's regulation enforcement 1983 OBJECTIVES - To acquire lands for the Flood Control Program and Lake Ontario Waterfront Open Space land - Administration of taxes and insurance for both Water and Related and Conservation and Recreation - Provision for regulation enforcement FUNDI~G The funding for this program is on a shared basis with 55% and 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded by general levy on all participating municipalities FINANCIAL COMM~~TS The funding for realty taxes does not make allowances for any market value assessment that may be implemented in 1983. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 1,175,000 39,000 329,200 1,543,200 82.08.30 Page IV-I0 1983 BULGEI' ESTIMI\Trn DIVISICN Finance and Mninistration Program: Property Acquisition, Maintenance & Managanent. I I I I I I 1983 BULGEI' I s:JURC!S CF F~!>J::m:; I 1982 BULGEI' I 1982 ACIUALS I I .~IVI'lY I I NET I ProVINCIAL I MWICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' LEV'.{ I amrn I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDI'ruRES I REVENUES I I $ I $ I $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I I F1cx::d Centro1 I I I I I I I I I lland Acquisition 550, 000 I I 550,000 I 302, SOO I 247,500 I SOO,ooo I I I I I I I I I I I I I IWate=fron~ Sazard I I I I I I I ! ILarn Acquisition 325,000 I I 325, 000 I 162,500 l62,SOO I 200,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I IWa~erfront I I I I I I I I lOf:en Space Land I I I I I I I I I .n.cquisition 300,000 I I 300,000 I 150,000 150,000 I 200,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I lLeqal Costs I I I I I I I I I Re;illation I I I I I I I I I EnforceJreI1t I 11 , 000 I I 11,000 I 6,050 4,950 I 15,000 I I I I I I I I I I I~iater & Related I I I I I I I Taxes I 262,000 I I 262,000 144 , 100 II 7, 900 I 234,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I Insurance I 14,300 I I 14, 300 7,865 I 6,435 I 12,800 I I I I I I I I I I I I Conservation & I I I I I I I I I I Recreation I I I I I I I I I Taxes I 67,200 I I 67,200 33,600 I 33,600 I I 60,000 I I I I I I i I I I I I Insurance I 13, 700 I I 13, 700 6,850 I 6,850 I I 12,200 I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'lUI'AL I 1,543,200 I I 1,543,200 I 813,465 I 482, 235 I 247,500 I 1,234,000 I I I 82 ~ 30 Page .!y::!!. 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Finance and Administration PROGRAM Vehicle & Equipment Purchases - New and Replacement PURPOSE To sustain the Authority's vehicles and equipment, and food services equipment complement at adequate levels to assure economy, efficiency and productivity in various programs 1983 OBJECTIVES - To purchase the following equipment Division Vehicle Replacement New Equipment Replacement Equipment Water Resource 25,000 3,000 Conservation Land Management 27,000 13,600 143,650 Information & Education 15,000 3,480 67,000 13,600 150,130 FU~mING Replacement vehicles and equipment are funded via recoveries (based on use) from operating divisions and includes provincial grant and municipal levies as applicable through the Motor Pool Fund New equipment and vehicles are funded from municipal levy FINANCIAL COMMENTS No recovery is available from the Ministry of Natural Resources for Food Service Equipment It is necesary to derive funds for Food Service Equipment from the Authority's Operating Fund. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Vehicles & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 280,730 280,730 82 08 11 Page IV-12 1983 BUeGE!' J:STIMATES DIVISICN Finance am h:lministration Program: Vehicle &. Equiprent Purchases - New &. Replacement I I I I 1 I I 1983 BUeGE!' I SOURCES OF FINAN::IN:i 1982 BUeGE!' I 1982 ACTl1ALS I I J>CrIVIT'l I I I NEl' PROVllCIAL MUNICIPAL I I I I , I I EXPENDITllRES I REVENillS I EXPENDI'ItlRES GRAN!' LFN'i 0I'Hm EXPENDrn.JRES I REVENillS I EXPmDI'IURES REVENillS I I I ~ I $ I $ $ $ $ ~ I $ I $ $ I 'Vehicles - New I I , - , I I I , I I I I - Replacement I 67,000 I I 67,000 67,000 79,000 I , I I I I I I E..'}Uiprrent. - Hew I 13,600 I 13,600 13,600 9,100 I I I , I I I I - Replacement I 150,130 I 150,130 150,130 118,190 I I I I I I Food Services I I , I Fquiprent I 50,000 I SO, 000 50,000 1 35,735 I I I I , , I I I I I I I , , , I I I I I I I , I I I I I , I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I , I I I I I I I , I I I I I , , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'roI'AL I 280,730 , 280,730 I 13,600 I 267,130 I 242,025 I 82.08.11 Page V-l 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES THE WATER RESOURCE DIVISION This Division is responsible for the carrying out of the approved water management policies and prograres of the Authority, as they apply to the river systems and the Lake Ontario Waterfront, including - administration of the Flood Control Program: - administration of the Waterfront Development and Shoreline Management Program: - administration of the Storm Water Management Program: - the development and operation of the Flood Warning System: - technical advice and direction concerning the enforcement of the Authority's fill regulations and development control: - environmer.tal monitoring and review of flood control and waterfront projects: - the administration of the Authority's Erosion and Sediment Control Program: - the co-ordination of site plans and development with municipalities and Province of Ontario 82 09.27 1982 ACHIEVEMENTS Page V-2 Provided aoequate funding for staff to achieve program objectives Completed final engineering and first phase of construction for Bolton flood control works Completed flood control channel at Oak Ridges Completed studies of Palgrave Dam and Goodwood Pumping Station Operated and maintained existing flood control structures; carried out ~aintenance on Massey Creek channel Operated and continued improvements to the Flood Warning and Flood Forecasting System U?dated hydrological studies and flood plain mapping Provided protection from erosion and slope instability at priority sites in Metropolitan Toronto, Peel, York and Durham; Co~~enced Highland Creek remedial erosion control works Completed Environmentally Significant Areas study and circulated to member municipalities and interested agencies Completed Environmental Assessment report for Keating Channel remedial measures Reviewed and commented on development proposals; administered Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways regulations Reviewed and commented on Storm Water Management proposals and reports Completed Humber Bay West Phase II; substantially completed Bluffers Phase II Continued development at Marie Curtis Park 1983 PRIORITIES Flood Control to provide for administration of the Flood Control Program to complete remedial flood control measures at Bolton to operate and maintain the Flood Warning and Flood Forecasting System to maintain Flood Control dams to maintain Flood Control channels and structures to maintain other water control structures Erosion Control to carry out remedial measures in Metropolitan Toronto on a priority basis to complete Phase I, Highland Creek remedial measures . to carry out remedial measures in Peel, York and Durham on a priority basis to commence Phase II, Highland Creek remedial measures Shoreline Management ~o carry out remedial measures on Lake Ontario Shoreline on a priority basis Environmental and Other Studies to Lndertake pre-engineering studies to co~~ence preparation of Master Drainage Plans to update and continue various Watershed studies Lake Ontario Waterfront Cevelopment to provide for administration of Lake Ontario Waterfront programs to commence work at Samuel Bois Smith Waterfront Area to provide internal access and servicing at East Point . to complete servicing and site stabilization at Bluffers Park . to complete initial development {road access, parking> at Bluffers Toplands to continue Environmental Monitoring Program . to provide predevelopment maintenance 82 09.27 Page V-3 1983 BUOOEl' ESTIMI\TES DIVISION Water Reso~lrce SECI'IOO Flood Control I I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' I SOURCES OF FrnAN:1NG I 1982 BUOOEl' 1982 ACI'UAIS ! 1 PR03RAM I I NEl' I PROVINCIAL I MUNICIPAL I I I I I I EXPENDI'roRES I REVENUES I EXPENDI'roRES I GRANl' I LEVY" I OI'HER I EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ I $ I I Progra'll I I I I I I I ! I I Adrr1inistration 743,663 ! I 743, 663 I 394,856 I 337,686 I 11,121 I 680,640 I I I I I I I I I I I ! I IErosion Me-tro 396,500 I 11,500 I 385,000 I 211, 750 I 173,250 I I 415,000 I 15,000 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I !Erosion York I 23 , 500 I 3,500 I 20,000 I 11,000 I 9,000 I I 21 , 500 I 1,500 I 1 I , I I I I I I I I I I IErasion Peel I 35,600 I 5,600 I 30,000 I 16,500 I 13, 500 I I 32,000 I 2,000 I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I Ia-asion D..;rham I 5,000 I I 5,000 I 2,750 I 2,250 I I 5,300 I 300 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Flood Cor.trol I I I I I I I I I I I I Planning & I I I I I I I I I I I I Renedial Works I 1,343,500 I I 1,343,500 I 644,775 I 93, 825 I 604,900 I 1,096,680 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !Flocd Ccntrol I I I I I I I I I I i River I I I I I I I I I I Forecasting 127,261 I I 127,261 I 69,993 I 57, 268 I I 121,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I 'Flood Control I I I I I I I I I /-I.air:tenance/ I I I I I 1 I I I Srrall D:lms & ! I I I I I I I I Channels 258, 000 I I 258,000 141,900 I 116,100 I I 155,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! IDl'AL 2,933,024 I 20,600 I 2,912,424 1,493,524 I 802,879 I 616,021 I 2,527,120 I 18,800 I I 82 09 27 Page V-4 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control ?ROGRl-_"I Program Administration PURPOSE To provide ad~inistrative, planning, biological and engineering staff necessary for implementing 1983 programs 1983 OBJECT!VES Complete the 1983 phases of the Water Resource Division programs of flood control, development control and environmental planning and monitoring within the funding limits FU~~DING 'l''lis is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy en all participating municipalities F!NANCIAL CO~MENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utili ties Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 665,363 l5,200 63,100 743,663 82 09 27 Page V-5 1983 BUD3ET ESrI~TES DIVISION Water Resource SH:I'ION Flood Control Program: Program Administration I I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOET I SOURCES Cl!' F:rNAOCING I 1982 BUD3ET I 1982 ACIUALS I I ACl'IVITY ! I I NET I proVINCIAL I MlINICI?.aL I I I I I I I i EXPTh'DI'I'L'RES I REVENUES I EXPENDI'n.'RES I GRAJ';'T I lEV'{ I arHER I EXPENDrnJRES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I REVUlUES I i i $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I iSa1aries I 553,826 I I 553,826 I 292, 371 I 250,334 I il, 121 I 522,370 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Benefits I 111,537 I I ill, 537 I 61,345 I 50,192 I I 110,405 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Travel I 14,000 I I 14,000 I 7,700 I 6,300 I I 14,765 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I EnforcEment t I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Officer Travel I 17,600 I I 17,600 I 9,680 I 7,920 I I 14,600 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ITechnica1 M3ps I I I I I I I I I I I I Legal I 9,000 I I 9,000 I 4,950 I 4,050 I I 15,000 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I IData Processing I 5,500 I I 5,500 I 3,025 I 2,475 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IFlood Control I I I I I I I I I I I i Works:---.op I 3,500 I I 3,500 I I 3,500 I I 3,500 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IRegulations - I I I I I I I I I I I I Fill & ! I I I I I I I I I I I I Construction I 28,700 I I 28,700 I 15,785 I 12,915 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDI'AL I 743,663 I I 743,663 I 394,856 I 337,686 I 11 , 121 I 680,640 I I I I 82 09 27 Page V-6 1983 BUDGET ESTI~~TES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM Erosion Control - Metropolitan Toronto PURPOSE To minimize toe hazards of erosion to life and property within Metropolitan Toronto 1983 OBJECTIVES - To carry out remedial protection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis - To continue to update and augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities FUNDING T:'1is is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and ~he balance ~eir.g fU:1ced ::rom the benefiting municipality, being the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto FINANCIAL CO~MENTS Total cost includes expected revenues of $11,500 OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Survey & Services & Wages Utilities Equipment Legal & Rents TOTAL $ 77 , 900 130,000 800 10,000 177,800 396,500 82 08 10 Paqe V-7 1983 Blirx;IT ESI'IMA.'l'E; mvrsICN Water Resource S:E:CTI CN Flocx:l Control PrCXJr"arn: Erosion Ccntrol - Metro I ! I I I I I I 1983 BULGIT I SOURCES OF FINI.N::IN3 I 1982 BULGIT I 1982 ACI'lIALS I ! ACrIVITY I I I NEl' I PROvr~IAL I MUNICIPAL I I I I I ! I EXPENDITURES ! RE.VENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' LEV'{ ornER I EXPENDITURES I REIJENLJ"ES I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I I I $ I S I S I $ $ $ I $ 1 S I $ I $ I I Administration I 43.000 I 43,000 I 23,650 19,350 I 38. 000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! R3:ledial Works I 353,500 I 11 , 500 342,000 I 188,100 153,900 I 377,000 I 15,000 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IOI'AL I 396,500 I 11 , 500 I 385.000 211,750 I 173,250 415.000 15.000 I I I 82 08.10 Page V-8 1983 BUDGET ESTI~~TES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROG~ ~rosion Control - Peel PURPOSE To mi~imize the hazards of erosion to life and property within the Regional Municipality of Peel 1983 OBJECTIVES - To carry out remedial pro~ection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis - To cont~nue to upda~e and augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities FUND HlG This a shared program. 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the benefiting municipality, being the Regional Municipality of Peel FINA~CIAL COMMENTS To~al cost incluces expec~ed revenues of $5,600 OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS ~aterials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Survey & & Wages Utili~ies Equipment Property & Rents Legal TOTAL $ 3,000 12,300 l6,80~ 3,500 35,600 82 08 10 Page V-9 1983 BUD3EI' ESTIMA'i'ES DIVISICN \~ter Resource SECTION Flood Conttrol P::-ogram: Erosion Control - Peel I I I I I I I I 1983 BUD3EI' I SOURCES OF FINAN::mG I 1982 BULGEr I 1982 ACI'UAlS I I ;'~IVITY I I I NET' I PRO\IIN2IAL I MUNICIPAL I I I I j ! EXP~ITURES I R::.-vENUES I EXP:rnDITURES I GRANT I WJ'i I OI'HER I EXPENDITURES RE\1lliUES I EXP:rnDITURES I REIlE~rUES I I $ 1$ I $ I $ I $ 1$ I $ $ I $ I $ I Administration 4,000 I I 4,000 I 2,200 I 1,800 I I 2,500 I I I I I I I I I I I IRenedial Works 31,600 I 5,600 I 26,000 I 14,300 I 11,700 I I 29,500 2,500 I I I : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I 'TOTAL I 35,600 I 5,600 30,000 I 16,500 13,500 I I 32,000 I 2,500 I I I 82 08 10 Page Y:lQ 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM Erosion Control - Yor~ PURPOSE To minimize the hazards of erosion to life and property within the Regional Municipality of York 1983 OBJECTIVES - To carry out remedial protection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis - To conti~ue to update and augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the benefiting municipality, being the Regional Municipality of York FIN&~CIAL COMMENTS Total cost includes expected revenues of $3,000 OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Survey & & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Legal TOTAL $ 3,500 8,000 10,500 1,500 23,500 82 08.10 Page V-ll 1983 BUOOEl' EST~ES DIVISION Water Resource SECI'ICN F1cod Control Program: Erosion Ca1tro1 - York I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' I SOURCES OF FINAN:IN3 1982 BUIX;ET I 1982 F>.cruAI.S I 1 JICl'IVITY I I I NEI' I PROVT..N:::IAL MUNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXP~ITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRANI' LEVY I 0l'HER EXPENDITURES I REVnlUES I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I I I $ I $ I $ I $ $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I I Administration I 2,000 I I 2,000 I 1,100 900 I 2,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Remedial ~ks 21, 500 I 3,500 I 18,000 I 9,900 8,100 I 19,500 I 1,500 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDl'AL I 23, 500 I 3,500 20,000 I 11,000 I 9,000 I I 21, 500 I 1,500 I I I 82 08.10 Page V-l2 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTIO~ Flood Control PROGRAM Erosion Control - Durham ?URPOSE To minimize the hazards of erosion to life and property within the Regional Municipality of Durham 1983 OEJECTIVES - ~o carry out remedial protection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis - To continue ~o upda~e and augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities Ftm'DING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from tz"e benefiting wunicipality, being the Regional Municipali~y of Durham FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE Ch~SSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wag~ Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 600 2,000 2,400 5,000 82.08 10 Page V-13 1983 BUIX>E!' ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECI'ION FlocxJ. Control ?rogrdlTl : Erosion Control - lAlrharn I I I I I ! I I 1983 BUIX>E!' I SOURCES OF FINAN::IN3 I 1982 BUIX>E!' I 1982 AC1'UAlS I I ACrIVITY I I I NET I PROvnK:IAL I MUNICIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I RE.'VENJES I EXPENDITURES I GRl\Nl' I LEV'{ I amm I EXPENDITURES I REVmUES I EXPENDITURES I REVmUES I I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I Il>.cministration I 300 I I 300 I 165 I 135 I 500 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I Remedial v.tlrks I 4,700 I I 4,700 I 2,585 I 2,115 I 4,800 I 300 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDI'AL I 5.000 I 5,000 I 2,750 I 2,250 I I 5,300 300 I I I 82 08 10 Page V-14 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM Flood Control Planning and Remedial Measures PURPOSE To undertake a comprehensive program of flood control designed to prevent, eliminate or reduce the risk of hazard to life and property, while cognizant of the natural attributes of the valley system 1983 OBJECTIVES - To continue to carry out preliminary engineering~~ on the Authority's damage centres - To complete flood control remedial works on the Humber River at Bolton - To assist municipalities in the preparation of Master Drainage Plans for storm water management - To continue erosion contc~' measures on Highland Creek FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities, with the exception of the Bolton remedial works where funding is to be provided 100% by the Province of Ontario FINANCIAL COMM~~TS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Mac.erials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 5 '>"" 55,000 1,283,000 1,343,500 "V 82 08.10 Page V-15 1983 BULGEr EST:IMf\TES DIVISICN Water Resource SECrICN Flocd Control Program: F10cd Control Planning and Renedia1 r-'lffisures I I I I , I 1983 BUI:X:;Er I 9JURCES OF FINAN:ING , 1982 BULGEr , 1982 AC!'lJJI.LS 1 I ACI'IVI'IY I NEI' I PROVINCIAL MlNICIPAL I I I I I I EXPrnDI'roRES I REVENUES EXPrnDI'roRES I GRAN!' IEIJ'l I aI'HER I EXPENDITURES R..."VENUES I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I I $ I $ $ I $ $ I $ I $ $ I $ ! $ I I , I I I I I I !301ton Remedial , I ! I , I I I Works 1,135,000 I 1,l35,000 I 530,100 , 604,900 I 540, 000 I I I I I I I , I I I i , , , I I , 1 Pre lilninary I I I I I I I Engineerir.g I 25,000 I 25,000 13, 750 11,250 I I 54 , 300 , I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I 11-'.aster Drainage , I I I I I , I I , Planning , 20,000 I 20, 000 11,000 I 9,000 I I 20,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Err.ironmenta1 , I I I I I I I I I I Swdies I 13, SOO I I 13 , 500 7,425 I 6,075 I I 55,000 I I 1 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Hig!":land I I I I I I I I I I I Creek I 150,000 I I 150,000 82,500 I 67,500 I I 100,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I 'Keating I I I I I I I I I I I I Channel I I I I I I I 250,000 I I I I 62.09 27 Page V-l6 1983 nUIX;ET ESTIf-1ATES DIVISICN Water Resource SB::I'ICN Flcx:rl Control Prograrn Flcx:rl Control Planning and Renedial Measures I I I I I I i 1983 nUD3E:I' I OOURCES OF FINA."X:ING 1982 BlJlX;ET I 1982 ACI'Ul\IS I I ACr:vITY I I I t-4"'EI' I PROVINCIAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES 1 REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRANT I IDlY I OI'HER EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I REVENUTI:; I I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I I I I I I I I I I I I 10ak Ridges I I I I I I I I I I I Cb.a.'1nel - I I I I I I I I I I 1 Re:nedial \'larks ! I I I I I 35,000 I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I , ! I I I I I I I I I I I !F:l.cx:rl Plain I I I I I I I I I I I I r-<.apping I I I I I I I 42,380 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'roI'AL I 1,343,500 I I I, 343,SOO I 644,775 I 93,825 I 604,900 I 1,096,680 I I I , 82 09 27 Page V-17 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM Flood Control Maintenance/Small Dams, Channels. Erosion Control Structures PURPOSE Maintaining capital works already in place 1983 OBJECTIVES - To provide for regula~ maintenance of the water control structures at a level comparable with 1982 - To carry out major maintenance at Palgrave Dam and in the Lower Humber Channel FUNDING Tnis is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded by the General Levy on all participating municipalities FINANCIAL COMMENTS Funding has been allocated in order to cover a progressive maintenance program, including non-recurring major maintenance OBJECTIVE CL~SSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utili ties Equipment Property lie Rents TOTAL $ 49,045 34, ISO 174,805 258,000 82 09 27 Page V-l8 1983 BtJI::GET ESTIMATES DIVISICN Water Resource SECI'ICN Flood Control Program Flood Control Maintenance/5mal1 rams, Channels, Eros~on Control Strucrures I I I ! I I I I 1983 BtJI::GEr I s::JURCES OF FINAN::ING I 1982 BtJI::GET I 1982 .a.CIUJ..rs I I ACTIVI'lY I I I NET I PROVIXIAL ~-:rCIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPENDI'roRES I REVENUES I EXPENDIT'u'RES I GRANT' lEVY I OI'HER I EXPENDlTUP.ES I REVENUES I EXPENDrrriRES I rtLv'ENUES I I I $ I ~ I $ I $ S I S I S I $ I $ I S i I I I I I I I I I I I I SnaIl Da:ns I 14,000 I I 14,000 I 7,700 6,300 I I 13,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I IMajor Maintenance I 162,000 I I 162, 000 I 89,100 72,900 I I 60,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i ! I Erosion I i I I I I I ! I I ! Channels I 7,000 1 I 7,000 I 3,850 3,150 I I 7,000 I I I ! I I I I I I I 1 I I I I IF100d Control I I I I I I I I I I I I C'nanr.els I 75,000 I I 75,000 I 41, 250 I 33,750 I 75,000 I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I ! I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I i , I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I rorAL I 258,000 I I 258,000 I 141,900 I 116,100 I I 155,000 I I I I 82 09 27 Page V-19 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRN1 Flood Control River Forecasting Operations/Maintenance Water Control Structures PURPOSE To operate, maintain and improve the Authority's ability to provide the earliest possible warning of a flood threat and to operate its flood control structures. 1983 OBJECTIVES _ To continue regular operation and maintenance of the Flood Control Works and the Flood Warning and Flood Forecasting System at a level comparable with 1982 - To upgrade the data collection and analysis techniques required for advanced flood warning FUNDING This is a s~ared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded by the General Levy on all participating municipalities PI~~~CIAL COMMENTS Funding has been allocated in order to cover a progressive maintenance program, including non-recurring major maintenance OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 55,798 23,750 6,080 41,633 127,261 82 09 27 Page V-20 1983 BUIX;ET ESTIMI\TES DIVISION Water Rescurce SFrI'IOO' Flcxx1 Control Program: F1cxx1 Control River Forecasting Operations/Haintenance Water Control Structures I I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOEI' I OOURCES OF FINA."X:ING I 1982 BUIX;ET I 1982 ACT'UAIS I I ACI'IVITY I I I NEl' I PROVINCIAL I MlNlCIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPElIDlTURES I RE'VE1mES I EXPElIDITURES I GRANT I IEVY OI'HER I EXPENDI'roRES I REVENUES I EXPTh'DI'roRES I JL.~ I I I $ I ~ I $ I $ I $ ~ I $ I $ I $ i $ I I I I I I I I I I I I I C1aireville Dam I 38,324 I I 38,324 I 2l , 078 I 17,246 I 35,750 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I G Ross Lord Dam I 33,437 I I 33,437 I 18,390 I 15, 04 7 I 30,550 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I Flcxx1 Warning I 41,000 I I 41,000 I 22,550 I 18,450 I 40, 200 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F1ClOd Warning I I I I I I I I I I I System Equipmt./I I I I I I I I I I I !-Welling I 14,500 I I 14, SOO I 7,975 I 6,525 I I 14,500 I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IUI'l\L I 127,261 I I 127,261 69, 993 I 57,268 I I 121,000 I I I I 82 09 27 Page V-2l 1983 BUD3El' ESTIMi\TES DIVISICN Water Resource ~ICN Waterfront , I I I I I I I 1983 BUD3ET SOORCES OF FINAN:ING I 1982 BUD3El' I 1982 AcrJALS I t I PROORAM I I I NEI' PROVIN:IAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPENDI'IURES I RE.'ImIDES I EXPENDI'IURES GRANl' I lEoN I ornER I EXPENDI'roRES I RE.'VmUES I EXPENDI'roRES I REVrnUES I I I $ I $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ i I I I I I I I I I i I l~vaterfront I I I I I I I I I I I Administration I 298,739 I I 298,739 149, 369 I 149,370 I I 318,786 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I Lake Cbtario I I I I I I I I I I Waterfront I I I I I I I I I I , I I Deve10prrent I 1,531,261 I 150,000 I 1,381,261 I 690,631 I 690,630 I I 1,440,671 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Shoreline I I I I I I I I I I I I Managarent I 495,000 I I 495,000 I 247, 500 I 247,500 I I 640,543 I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDI'AL I 2,325,000 I 150,000 I 2,175,000 I 1,087,500 I 1,087,5OO I I 2,400,000 I I I I 82 00.71 Page V-22 1983 BUDGET ESTD1ATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTIO~ Waterfront PROGRAM Waterfront Administration PURPOSE To provide administrative, planning, biological and engineering staff necessary for implementing Waterfront projects 1983 OBJECTIVES - To proceed with design and construction of waterfront areas and shoreline management projects - To proceed with planning and approval submissions for future waterfront and shoreline management works FUNDING This is a shared progra~, 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being f\...nded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL COMMENTS Salaries and wages have been gapped h~' a factor of 1% OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 277 ,739 21,000 298,739 82 09 27 Page V-23 1983 BUDGEI' ESTll1ATES DIVISION Water Resource SErI'ICN Waterfront Program: Waterfront klministration I I I I I I I I 1983 BUDGEI' I saJRCES OF FINtlN::IOO , 1982 BUDGEI' I 1982 .~JpLS I I ACrIVITY I I I NEl' I PROVIN:IAL I '1lli'ICIPAL ! I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES , R..."VElnJES I EXPENDIWRES , GRANT I WJ'{ I OTHER I EXPENDI'IDRES 1 REVThlJES I EXPENDI'IDRES I OL"VTh'UF:3 I I I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I ;; i I , I I I I , I I I I i 'Salaries I 219,575 I 219,575 I 109,787 I 109,788 I I 218,340 , 1 I I I I I I I I I ! I i I I Benefits I 58,164 I 58,164 I 29,082 I 29,082 i I 91,346 I I I I 1 I I I I I , I I I I Travel I 9,000 I 9,000 I 4,500 I 4,500 , I 9,100 I 1 I ! ! I 1 I I I I I I I I I Data Processing I 5,000 I 5,000 , 2,500 I 2,500 I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I t-'.iscellanecus I 7,000 I I 7,000 I 3,500 I 3,500 I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I 1 I ! ! I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I , ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I ! I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'lUrAL I 298,739 I I 298,739 I 149,369 I 149,370 I I 318,786 I I I I 82 09 27 Page ~ 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Waterfront PROGRAM Shoreline Management PURPOSE To continue the program of shoreline management designed to prevent, eliminate or reduce the risk of hazard to life and property, wnile being cognizant of the natural attributes of the lake front setting 1983 OBJECTIVES - To construct protection of vulnerable shoreline areas on a priority basis FUNDING This is a shared program, 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded by the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto as benefiting municipality FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 73,000 201,500 1,500 219,000 495,000 82 08 30 Page V-25 1983 13UD3ET ESTIMATES orVISICN Water Resource SEx::TICN Waterfront ?rogram: Shorelil'1e 1.1a."1agement I I I 1 I I I I 1983 Bur:m:r I SOORCES OF FINAN::IN:; I 1982 Bl.JLX;ET I 1982 ACIUAIS I I ACI'IVIT'l I I I NET' I PROVIN.:DL ! MlNICIPAL I 1 I I I I I 1 EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPlli'DITURES I GRA./\''I' , LE.'\f.{ I amrn I EXPlli'DI'IURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITliRES I REI.lTh"'"lIDi I , I I $ ; $ ! $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I Lakehurst Court I 235,000 I I 235,000 I 11 7, 500 I 117, 500 I I 75,000 i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I Design I 15,000 I I 15,000 I 7,500 1 7,500 I I 75,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! V.ai.t'1tenance i 15,000 I I 15,000 I 7,500 I 7,500 I I 50,000 I I I I , ! I I I I 1 I 1 I ! I I , I 1 S:Jt.:ti1 tI=ine I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I ~ive I 220, 000 I I 220, 000 I 110,000 I 110,000 I I 150, 000 ! I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I ISluff Drainage I 10,000 I I 10,000 I 5,000 I 5,000 I I 20,000 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ! I I I Cr .~scent\\ol:JCld i I I I I I I 20,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I KL"'lgsbury I I I I I I I 50,393 I I I ! ! ! I I I I 1 I I I I I i C-uild Inn I I I I I I 50, 000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i Spnngbank Ave I I I I I 1 150,150 I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I ! I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I 1 I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDI'AL I 495,000 I I 495,000 I 247,500 I 247,500 I I 640,543 I I I I 82 08 30 Page V-26 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Waterfront PROGRAM Lake On~ario Waterfront Development PURPOSE The purpose of the Waterfront Plan is to create, on the Lake Ontario shoreline, within the area of the Authority's jurisdiction, a handsome waterfront, balanced in its land uses, which will complement adjacent areas, taking cognizance of existing residential development and making available, wherever possible, features which warrant public use 1983 OBJECTIVES - To commence development at Samuel Bois Smith - To complete services and site work at Bluffers Park - To complete initial deve1opmen~ at the Bluffers Toplands - To provide internal access and servicing at East Point Park. - To continue Environmental Moni~oring program - To continue to provide pre-development maintenance FUNDING This is a shared program, 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the Ivaterfront Capital Levy on all participating municipalities It is anticipated that revenue will be derived from t~e landfilling operation at the Samuel Smith Waterfront Area FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wace:i Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL - - $ 109,500 15,300 10,000 1,396,461 1,531,261 82 09 27 Pase '1-27 1983 But'GE!' ESTIMATES DIVISICN Water Resource S~ICN Waterfront Program: Lake Cbtario Waterfront Ceve10plrent - Capital I I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOE!' I SXJRCES OF FINAOC:m:; I 1982 But'GE!' 1982 .r.~ I I I ACI'IVI'IY I I I NEI' I PROVIOCIAL I MtNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITlJRES I REVENUES I EXPENDI'IURES I GRAN!' I IEVY I OI'HER I EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES EXPENDI'IURE31 RE'\ffi;\..,'E$ i I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ I $ I IMarie Olrtis I 55,000 I I 55,000 I 27,500 I 27,500 I I 50,000 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I Sam Sui th I 400,000 I 150,000 I 250,000 I 125,000 I 125,000 I I 250, 671 I I I I I I I I I I I I !H~ Bay West I 130,000 I I 130,000 I 65,000 I 65,000 I I 250,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I lAquatic Park i 40,000 I I 40,000 I 20,000 I 20, 000 I I 23,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !Ashbridges Bay I 5,000 , I 5,000 I 2,500 I 2,500 I I lO,OOO I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I Bluffers I I I I I , I I I I I Top1a.'1ds I lOO,OQO I I 100,000 I 50, 000 I 50, 000 I I 50,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'Bluffers Park I 330,000 I I 330,000 I 165, 000 I 165,000 I I 670,000 I , 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I lEast Point I 344,261 I I 344,261 I 172,130 I 172,131 I I 5,000 I I 1 ! , I I I I I I I I I I I I I ?ec.tic:oat Creek I 5,000 I I 5,000 I 2,500 I 2,500 I I 10,000 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I IAjax Waterfront I 30,000 I I 30,000 I 15,000 I 15,000 I I 25,000 I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I 1 tb'li taring I 72,000 I I 72,000 I 36,000 , 36,000 I I 72,000 I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I Pre-Develoarent I I I I I I I I I I I I Property Mgt I 20,000 I I 20,000 I 10,000 I 10,000 I I 20,000 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I P.unber Bay ~t I I I I I I I 5,000 I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I 'IUI'AL I 1,531,261 I 1SO,000 I 1,381,261 I 690,630 I 690,631 I I 1,440,671 I I I I 82.09' 27 Page ~ 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES THE CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT DIVISION This Division is responsible for the Watershed Recreation Program ~mich includes the planning, development, operation and maintenance of recreational uses of conservation lands and all related activities including the operations of the Authority's central stores This Division is responsible for the implementation and administration of the Conservation Land Management Program for private landowners and the resource management of lands acquired as part of the Flood Control and Waterfront programs, except those under management agreements with municipalities 82 08 06 1982 ACHIEVEMENTS Page ~ Conservation Land Management developed guidelines for implementation of directives for Urban Management component, Resource Management Tracts and management of Environmentally Significant Areas. prepared audio-visual on Urban Management for use with other public agencies increased assistance to landowners for "Conservation Plans": maintained same level as 1981 in plantings, woodlot management participated in municipal, Provincial and Federal programs to provide employment and training to unemployed and special groups Watershed Recreation finalized terms of reference and completed Phase I of Boyd Master Plan. . completed first of two phases to improve access for disabled to Conservation Areas. . completed Indian Line Campground expansion Phase I and improvements to entrance to accommodate development of Highway 427 by Ministry of Transportation and Communications. . maintained Conservation Areas services at 1981 level. initiated major maintenance program at all Conservation Areas. 1983 PRIORITIES Conservation Land Management to reduce off-stream erosion and sedimentation through continued implementation of management programs on urban, rural and Authority lands . to improve fisheries potential to maintain forestry management program. Watershed Recreation . to maintain level of service for visitors to Conservation Areas and Forest and Wildlife Areas, allowing for the reduction of the Major Maintenance program . to continue the preparation of the Boyd Master Plan and complete the preparation of developed area Master Plans. review the recommendations of the 1982 marketing studie., develop a program to improve facilitie8 for visitor services and commence implementation. 82.10.12 Page VI-3 1983 BUIX;ET ESTINATES D:rv:rSICN Conservation Land Management I I I I I I I 1983 BUIX;ET I s::JURCES OF FINAN:ING 1982 BUIX;ET I 1982 ACIUALS I I PR03RAM I I NET I PROVINCIAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REVmUES EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' I lEV'{ I OI'HER EXPENDITURES I REVmUES I EXPENDITURES I REVmUES I I I ~ I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I Program 1 I I I I I I I I I Administration I 690,864 I 690,864 1 345,432 1 345,432 I 644,300 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I Watershed I I I I I 1 I I I I Recreation I I I I I ! , I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I - P1a11ning I 75,000 I 75,000 I 37,500 I 37,500 I I 120,000 I I I I I I - IA:ve1o~t I 223,110 I 223,110 I 100,575 1 106,065 I 16,470 I 627, 000 I I I I I - Operations I 2,135,600 I 1,016,000 1, 119, 600 1 I 1,119,600 I I 2,203,700 I l,ooo,CQol I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IConservation Land! I I I I I I I 1 I I I Managare.m. I 420,070 I 134,000 I 286,070 I 139,764 I 146,306 I I 329,000 I 44,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IOTAL 1 3,544,644 I 1,150,000 I 2,394,644 I 623, 271 I 1,754,903 16,470 I 3,924,000 I 1,044,0001 I I 82.09.27 Page y!.::! 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISIONI Conservation Land Management PROG RAM I Program Administration PURPOSE To provide support services, to administer and develop Authority owned conservation lands and to provide a program of conservation land management on public and private lands. Administration of the Central Services Workshop. 1983 OBJECTIVES I - To provide adequate staff and services to implement the 1983 programs, including the updating of developed area master plans, complete with operation and maintenance plans. FUNDING This is a shared program, 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services. & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 634,118 23, 296 33,450 690,864 82.10.12 Page ~ 1983 BUOOEl' ESTIMA.TES DIVISICN Conservation Land Management Program : Program Mrn:inistration I I I I I I I 1983 BUL'GET I SOURCES OF FINAN:::m::i I 1982 BUOOET I 1982 ACl'UAIS I ACl'IVI'lY I I I NET PROVIOCIAL I MtNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES I EXPENDI'IURES GRANl' I.EV'l I C1l'Hm I EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES I EXPENDI'IURES I REVmJES I I $ I $ I $ $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $. I I I I I I I I , I Salaries & Wages I I I I I I I I - Head Office I 302,222 302,222 151,111 151,111 I I 270,400 I I I - Central I I I I I I Services I 83,518 83,518 41,759 41,759 I I 88,000 I I I I I I I I I Travel I I I I I I - Head Office I 20,950 20, 950 10,475 10,475 I I 19,100 I I , - Central I I I I I \ Services I 5,000 5,000 2,500 2,500 I I 4,200 I I I I I I I I I 'Benefits I 248,374 248,374 124, 187 124, 187 I I 242,100 I I I , I I I I , I \Utilities & I I I I I I I Services I I I I I I - Head Office 8,900 8,900 4,450 4,450 I I 3,000 I I I - Central I I I I I I Services 21,900 I 21, 900 10,950 10,950 I 17,500 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IUl'AL 690,864 I I 690,864 345,432 345,432 I 644,300 I I 82 09.27 Page .y!::! 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Conservation Land Management PROGRAM Watershed Recreation Program - Planning PURPOSE To provide long-term and site planning for the development and operation of Conservation Areas and Forest and Wildlife Areas. 1983 OBJECTIVES - To complete the Boyd Master Plan, initiated in 1982, to provide direction and accommodate external planning issues. FUNDING This is a shared program, 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 4,000 71 , 000 75,000 82.10.12 Page VI-7 1983 BurGEr ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Ma.'1agement Program : Watershed Recreadon - Planning I I I I I I I I 1983 BULGEr I SOURCES OF Fma.N::IN:; I 1982 BurGEr I 1982 ACI'UAlS I I ACI'IVI'IY I I I NEl' I ~IAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPmDlTURES I RE:VmUES I EXPmDITURES I GRAN!' I u:w I amrn I EXPmDITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I REI.'lliUES I I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Bcl'.fd I-!aster I I I I I I I I I I I I Plan Stage I I I I I I I I 50,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Boyd fuster I I I I I I I I I I I I Plan Stage II I 75,000 I I 75,000 37,500 I 37,500 I I 50,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I IPlanning & I I I I I I I I I I ! Design Services I I I I I I 20,000 I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'lUI'AL I 75,000 I I 75,000 I 37,500 I 37,500 I I 120,000 I I I 82 09 27 Page VI-8 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Conservation Land Management PROGRAM Watershed Recreation - Development PURPOSE To develop grounds, facilities and services to provide outdoor recreation opportunities in accordance with the policies and program direction as established in the Watershed Plan. 1983 OBJECTIVES: - To continue improvements to Indian Line Campground including the construction of a 24 hour control building, and landscaping. - To complete improvements for access for the disabled to Conservation Areas. - To construct one indoor washroom building at Albion Hills Conservation Area. - To construct a new workshop in the Black Creek Conservation Area - To continue the award planting program. - To improve the safety of the entrance to the Cold Creek Conservation Area. FUNDING: This is normally a shared program, 50% of the funding being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. A special 75% grant from the Province of Ontario is available for the access program for disabled persons. FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 6,350 7,800 208,960 223, no 82.10.12 Page 17I -9 1983 BUI:GET ESTnl/\TES DIVISICN Calservation lar.d '.\ar1.aaernent. Watershed Recreation - Developrent ~ Program: I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOET SOORCES CF ~rm I 1982 BurGET I 1982 JI.cI'UAI.S I I lICl'IVI'IY I I NET Pl'CI.'nx:IAL MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES REVENUES I EXPENDITURES GRAN!' !EV'l I aI'HER I EXPENDITURES I REVmUES I EXPENDrroRES I REVrnUES I I I ~ ~ I ~ $ $ I ~ I $ I $ I $ I $ I I I I 1 I I I I I I Access - 1 I I I I I I I I I Disabled Persa1S I 21 , 960 I 21, 960 5,490 I 16,470 I 20,000 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I Irrlian Line - I I I I I I I I I Caltrol Buildin; I 86,000 I 86,000 I 43,000 43,000 I I 74,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I IAlbion Hills - I I I I I I I I I Washroans 1 71 , 000 I 71,000 I 35,500 35,500 I I 100,000 I I I I I I I I I I I IB.C C.A. - I I I I I I I I Workshop I 40,000 I 40,000 I 20,000 I 20,000 I 40,000 I I I I I I I I I I IB.C.C.A. - I I I I I I I Award Day l,650 I 1,650 I 825 I 825 I 1,500 I I I I I I I I I ICold Creek I I I I I I I Entrance I I I I I I I Develq::mmt 2,500 I 2,500 I 1,250 I l,250 I I I I Heart L:lke - I I I I I I Washroans I I I 100,000 I I I Irrlian Line - I I I I I I Washroans I I I 100,000 I I I I Irrlian Line - I I I I I I General I I I 176,500 I I INature Trail I I I I I I I I I Redevelopnent I I I I 15,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IUI'AL 223,110 I I 223,110 I 100,575 l06,065 I 16,470 627,000 I I I I 82.l0 12 Page Y!::.!.Q , 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Management PROGRAM Watershed Recreation - Operations and Maintenance PURPOSE To provide funding for the Operations and Maintenance component as identified in the Watershed Plan for providing recreation opportunities on Authority lands 1983 OBJECTIVES - To operate and maintain seven Conservation Areas and three Forest and Wildlife Areas to provide 1 1 million user days, eliminating the Major Maintenance program and the Canoe Instruction program. - To continue self-supporting visitor services programs to increase accessibility of recreation opportunities. - To maintain a high level of visitor safety - To review the 1982 marketing plan and develop recommendations to improve visitor services. FUNDING Program revenues provide approximately 48% of required funding, the balance being a General Levy on all participating municipalities FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 1,285,650 407,000 25l,800 191,150 2,l35,600 82.10.12 Page ~ 1983 BUI:GET ESTIMATES DIVISI<N: Conservation Land Managerrent Program: Watershed Recreation - Operations and Maintenance I I I I I I I I 1983 BUI:GET 1 9:URCES OF F'INAN:::IN3 I 1982 BUIXiET I 1982 ACI'UAIS I I N::rIVI'IY I NET I PROVIN:IAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' I IEVY: ornER I EXPFlIDrroRES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES 1 REVENUES I I I $ $ $ I $ $ $ I $ I $ I $ $ I I I 1 I I I I IAlbion Hills I 361,300 180,000 181,300 I 181 , 300 1 358,350 I 195,0001 I I I 1 I I I I IBcryd I 210,950 103,000 107,950 I 107,950 1 229,500 I 107,7001 I I I 1 I I I I I Bruce I s Mill 1 268,250 150,000 118,250 I 118, 250 1 273,750 I 168,0001 I I I I I I I IClaireville 1 335,100 249,000 86,100 I 86,100 I 352,850 I 204,6001 I I I I I I I Cold Creek I 191,000 74-,-000 117,000 I 117,000 I I 178,850 I 73,5001 I I I I I 1 I 1 I IGlen Haffy I 137, BOO I 43,000 I 94,800 I I 94, BOO I 145,450 I 33,4001 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I Greerr..ood I 165,300 1 43,000 I 122,300 I I 122,300 I 168 900 46,5001 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I Heart Lake 1 188,550 I 72,000 I 116,550 I 116,550 I 194,600 83,100 I I I I I I I I I I Palgrave I 18,450 I 9,000 I 9,450 I 9,450 1 17,400 6,9001 I I 1 I I I 1 I Pettiooat Creek I 238,350 I 93,000 I 145,350 1 145,350 I 233,050 81,3001 I I 1 I 1 I I I General I 20,550 I - I 20,550 I 20,550 I 51,000 I I I i I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I -- I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 'lOI'AL I 2,135,600 I 1,016,000 1 1,119,600 I 1,119,600 I 2,203,700 I 1,000,0001 I I 82.09 27 Page VI-:!.2 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Management. I I I RETAIL SALES I I I AREA I GATE REVENUES I PROGRAM REVEN1JES REVENUES I TOTAL I I I $ I $ $ I $ I I I I I I I I 1 I I I Albion Hills I 68,000 I 100,000 12,000 I 180,000 I I I I I I I Boyd I 93,000 I 6,000 4,000 I 103,000 I I I I I I I Bruce's Mill I 90,000 I 35,000 25,000 I 150,000 I 1 I I I 1 I Claireville I 62,000 I 19,000 2,000 I 83,000 I I I I I I I Indian Line Campground I -- I 161,000 I 5,000 I 166,000 I I 1 I I I I I Cold Creek I 21,600 I 21,200 I 31,200 I 74,000 I I I I I I I Glen Haffy I 29,900 I 9,600 1 3,500 I 43,000 I I I I I I Greenwood I 31,300 I 11 , 500 1 200 I 43,000 I I I I I I Heart Lake I 57,700 I 7,600 I 6,700 I 72,000 I I I 1 I I Palgrave I 9,000 I -- I -- I 9,000 I I 1 I I I Petticoat Creek I 56,200 I 33,300 I 3,500 I 93,000 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I TOTAL I 518,700 I 404,200 I 93,100 1 1,016,000 I I I 1 1 I I 82 09 27 ~ Page Y!.=.!1. 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Conservation Land Management PROGRAM : Conservation Land Management PURPOSE To provide technical assistance to private landowners to promote sound land management programs. To carry out resource management programs for Authority lands for water conservation, sediment control and fish and wildlife habitat improvement 1983 OBJECTIVES - To continue to provide reforestation, farm tree and shrub plantings, stream improvement and woodlot management 'to private and public landowners at the same level as in 1982. - To continue resource management on Authority lands at the same level as in 1982. - To continue the urban land program at a reduced level from 1982. - To increase revenues from plant propagation. FUNDING The Conservation Land Management Program is funded 55' Provincial grants and 45' municipal levy for water and related programs FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 179,020 35,650 45,400 260, 070 82.10.12 Page ~ 1983 BUI:GET ESTIMATES !)IVISION Conservation Lmd Management ?rogram: Conservation land Management I I I I I I I I 1983 BUI:GET I SOURCES OF FINAOCING I 1982 BT.JIX;ET I 1982 ACI'UAIS I I ACTIVITY I I I NET I PROVTh'CIAL I MUNICIPAL I I I I I I , i EXPENDITURES ! REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' I LEVY I aI'HER ! EXPENDITURES REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I RE\lENUES I i 1 I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ I $ I $ I I I I I I I I I I I I Plant. Propagation I 123,170 120,000 I 3,170 I 1,744 I 1,426 I , 40,000 30,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Reforestation I 22,700 2,000 I 20,700 I 11,385 I 9,315 I I 22, 700 2,000 I I I , I I I I I I I I I I !Urban Management I 21,300 - I 21,300 I 11,715 I 9,585 I I 31,400 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Farm Tree & I I I I I I I I I I Shrub I 17,900 10,000 I 7,900 I 4,345 I 3,555 I I 17,900 10,000 I I I ! I I I I I I I I !Resource I I I I I I I I I !'!anagement I 13 , 500 I - I 13,500 7,425 I 6,075 I I 21,400 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Fores1:. I I I I I I I I Managerrent I 41,500 I - I 41,500 22,825 I 18,675 I I 27,000 I I I I I I I I I I Stream I I I I I I I ! Improvement. I 20,000 I 2,000 I 18,000 9,900 I 8,100 I I 26,000 2,000 I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I'OI'AL I 260,070 I 134,000 I 126,070 I 69,339 I 56,731 I , 186,400 44,0001 82 09 27 Page VI-15 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Management PROGRAM Conservation Land Management - Conservation Planning PURPOSE To provide technical advice to private landowners to promote sound land management programs To carry our resource management planning activities for Authority lands and technical advice to agencies managing Authority lands in urban areas 1983 OBJECTIVES _ To continue to provide technical advice for reforestation, farm tree and shrub plantings, woodlot management, pond management and stream improvement to private and public landowners FUNDING This program is funded 55% by Provincial grants and 45% municipal levy FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Sularies Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 108,000 1,500 9,000 118,500 82.09.27 Page VI-16 1983 BUCGET ESTIMATES DIVISICN Cor.servation La.'1d Management ~C',J-ra<1: Conservation La.'1d t-'.anagement - Conse::-vation Planning I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOEI' I SOURCES OF Fll:mN::ING 1982 BUCGET I 1982 ACIUALS I i .~NIT'f I I I NEI' I ?ROVTh'CIAL I :1lNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES ! REVENLiE:::--! EXPENDI'lURES I GRANI' 1 LEV'{ I OI'HER EXPENDI'lURES 1 RE.VENtJE<5 1 EXPENDrroRES I REVENUES I , i , $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ I ~ I $ I $ I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I Conservation I I I I I I I I 1 I I Planning I 118,500 I 118,500 I 65,175 I 53,325 I 90,000 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I ! I 1 I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I TOTAL I 118,500 I 1 118,500 65,175 I 53,325 I I 90,000 1 I 82 09 27 Page VI-17 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation Land Management PROGRAM Conservation Land Management - Glen Haffy Fish Rearing PURPOSE To carry out a program of fish rearing and stocking for selected Authority Conservation Areas and Forest and Wildlife Areas 1983 OBJECTIVES - To produce approximately 45,000 rainbow trout. FUNDING Funding is provided 50% by provincial grant and 50% municipal levy for this program . FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 1,500 9,000 10,500 82.08.10 Page VI-18 1983 BUI:GEI' ESTIMATES DIVISION Conservation land Management Program: Ccnservation land Management - Fish Rearing I I I I I 1 1 1983 BUCGET I 9:XJRCES OF FINAN:IN3 I 1982 BUOOET 1982 ACruM.S I I lICl'IVI'IY I I I NET I PROVIOCIAL I MlNIC I PAL I I I I I I I EXPENDI'roRES , REVENUES I EXPENDI'roRES I GRA..'i1I' I LEV'! I ornER I EXPENDITURES I RE.VENUES EXPENDI'I'UIm51 RE.VENUES I I I $ I $ I $ $ I $ I $ $ I $ $ $ I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I Glen Haffy - I I I I I I I 1 Fish Rearing I 10,500 I I 10,500 5,250 I 5,250 I 10,500 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'roI'AL I 10,500 I I 10,500 I 5,250 I 5,250 I I 10.500 I I 82 08.10 Page VI-19 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Conservation Land Management PROGRM1 Conservation Land Management - Operations and Maintenance - Non-Revenue Properties PURPOSE To provide funding for the maintenance of non-revenue producing recreation areas 1983 OBJECTIVES: - To maintain two Forest and Wildlife Areas and the Woodbridge Flood Plain for non-revenue recreational use FUNDING Funding is provided 100% by municipal levy on all participating municipalities FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utili ties Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ lO,900 2,500 17,600 31,000 82 09 27 Page VI-20 1983 BUOOET ESTIM.I\TES DIVISICN Calservation Land ManagaTl"'-I1t Program: Calservation Land Management - ~ratiOl1S and Maintenance - Non-Rzvenue I I I I I I I 1 1983 BUDSET I SOURCES OF FINAN::rm I 1982 BUOOET I 1982 ACI'UAI.S I I lICl'IVI'I"i I I I NEI' I PROvrn:::IAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES 1 GRAN!' I WI'{ I 0IHm EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I I I $ I $ I $ I $ $ $ $ $ $ I $ I 1 I 1 I I 1000rations and I I I I Maintenance - I I I I Non-Revenue 1 31,000 I 31,000 I 31,000 42,100 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I' I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 'IDl'AL 31,000 I 31,000 I 31,000 I 42,100 1 I 82.09 27 Page VII-l 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES THE INFORMATION AND EDUCATION DIVISION This Division is responsible for the Community Relations Program of the Authority. Conservation Information functions include - the implementation of the general information programs, including the provision of both internal and external communications; - information on resource management programs; and - planning, market research, information and media contact Conservation Education functions include - conservat.ion field centres; - various historical and conservation interpret.ive programs: and - the Kortright Centre for Conservation 82 09 28 CONSERVATION INFORMATION Page VII-2 1982 Achievements Provided, at an increased level of service, a Conservation Information Program for Authority members and staff, ilie general public and special interest and community groups Provided, through market analysis, a communications program for the Authority's public use facilities; completed a visitors' survey report; developed a market plan for Conservation Areas, Black Creek Pioneer Village and Kortright Centre for Conservat.ion Provided information on the Authority's resource management programs; tour of Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds; production of technical bulletins 1983 Priorities To maintain 1982 level of service in Conservation Information Program To review and revise the communications program for Authority public use facilities as required by the results of the marketing plan; to commence implementation in 1983 To increase the level of information, through seminars and technical bulletins, on the Authority's resource management programs CONSERVATION EDUCATION 1982 Achievements Maintained the number of residential opportunities at the four residential field centres and day-use opportunities at Cold Creek Conservation Field Centre, Black Creek Pioneer Village and Bruce's Mill Increased visitation to Kortright Centre for Conservation by 20,000 Co-operated with York and Guelph Universities and the Canada Centre for Inland Waters in environmental research at Lake St George Provided opportunities for special groups at residential field centres (March of Dimes, York University, Archaeology program) Developed theme programs for Kortright Centre in Fish and Wildlife, Water and Renewable Energy Co~~enced major maintenance at Albion Hills and Claremont Field Centres 1983 Priorities To maintai~ the number of residential and day-use opportunities To accommodate 20,000 additional visitors at the Kortright Centre for Conservation To continue development of audio-visuals, exhibits and demonstrations for the Kortright Centre for Conservation To increase the use of volunteers in the Black Creek Pioneer Village program to reduce staff costs and increase funds available for operations and maintenance To continue to provide General Interpretive Programs at program cost To complete major maintenance at the Albion Hills Conservation Field Centre and to establish a major maintenance fund 82 09 28 Page VII-3 1983 BUI:GET ESTIM/l..TES DIVISICN: Informaticn and Etlucaticn I I I I 1 1983 BUOOET I 3XJRCES OF ~m:; 1 1982 BUOOET 1982 ACl'lIALS I 1 PROORAM I I NEl' I PR:JVnCIAL I MlNICIPAL I I 1 I EXPENDITURES I RE.VENlIES I EXPENDrroRES I GRAN!' I LEV':l omm EXPENDITURES I REVENUES EXPENDITURES I REVENUES 1 I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ $ I $ $ I $ I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 Program J\dmi.n I I I 1 1 I 1 General 308,665 I I 308,665 I 154 , 333 I 154,332 268,385 I 1 I Infonn. Supp:>rt 63,197 I 63,197 I 3l, 598 I 31 , 599 59,990 I 1 I EtluCation SIJI:p. 35,108 I 35,108 17, 554 I l7,554 32,117 1 I I Data Processing 22,000 I 22,000 11,000 I 11,000 I I 1 428,970 I 428,970 214,485 I 214,485 360,492 1 i I I I I I I Camnnity I I I 1 IRelations Infonn. I 1 I I I General I 81, 500 J 81,500 43, 925 1 37,575 1 74,100 I Resource Mgt. I 11,000 I 11 , 000 6,050 1 4,950 I lO,ooo I Planning/Market I 1 I I I Analysis I 90,243 I 90,243 I 90,243 1 125,000 I I 1 I 1 Cormtnity I I I IRelations Etluc 1 I I I Supv.Ops & Mtce 1,037,683 I 900,900 136,783 58,780 I 78,003 I 1,037,764 873,8001 I Supv.Ops & Mtce I I I 1 I I Kortright 6l5,413 , 33~,lOO 276,313 19,140 I 120,460 I 136,713 I 528,000 1 232,1501 I Supv.Ops & Mtce I I I 1 I I I B.C P V * * 147,950 I * 163,500 I * (15,550) I I I I * 174,450 I * 179,7001 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I Develcprent 100,000 1 I 100,000 I I I 100,000 I leo, SOD I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I . 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 'lUI7IL 2,364,809 1 1,240,000 I 1,124,809 I. 342,380 I 545,716 I 236,713 1 2,315,856 I 1,105,9501 I * 'lbese arrnmts are included in the Historical Sit.e& Divisial Budget, and do mt add to totals here. 82.10.05 Page VII -4 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM Program Administration PURPOSE To provide an administrative, supervisory and support service staff to implement a comprehensive information, community and staff relations and outdoor and conservation education program 1983 OBJECTIVES - To continue the programs carried out in 1982 at the same level of service FUNDING This is a shared program, 50% of the funds from the Province of Ontario and 50% from the general municipal levy FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes TOTAL $ 396,770 32,200 428,970 82 09.28 Page VII-5 1983 BUL'GET ESTIMATES DIVISlOO Information and Etlucation Program: Program Administration I I I I I I I I 1983 BUI:GET I saJRCl:S OF F~rm I 1982 BUI:GET I 1982 ACI'UALS I I lICl'IVI'IY I I NET I proVINCIAL I MlmCIPAL I I I I I 1 I EXPENDI'roRES REVENUES I EXPENDrroRES I GRAN!' I I.JN{ I 0l'HER I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES EXPENDrroRES REIJENUES I I I $ $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ $ I I I f I I 1 I I I General I I I I I I I I Salaries I 142,966 l42,966 1 71,483 I 71,483 I I 136,100 1 I i Expenses I 4,800 4,800 I 2,400 I 2,400 I I 6,500 I I I Benefits. I 132,482 132,482 66,241 I 66,241 I 1 125,785 I I I Severance Pay I 28,417 28,417 14,209 I 14, 208 1 I I I I I 308,665 308,665 154,333 I 154 , 332 I I 268,385 1 I I Carmunity I I I I I I Relations Inf I I 1 I I I Supp:>rt I I 1 I I I I Salaries I 59,497 59,497 29,749 I 29,750 I I 56,490 I I 1 Expenses I 3,700 3,700 1,849 I 1,849 I I 3,500 I , I I 63,197 63,197 31,598 I 31,599 I I 59,990 I I Cam1unity I I I I I Relations Etl I I I I I Support I I I I I Salaries I 33,908 33,908 I 16,954 16,954 I I 32,117 I I Expenses I 1,200 I 1,200 1 600 600 I 1 I I I 35,108 I 35,108 I 17 , 554 17,554 I I 32,117 I I I I I I 1 I I Data Processing I 22,000 I 22,000 I ~ 11,000 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IUl'AL I 428,970 I 428,970 I 214,485 214,485 I 1 360,492 I 1 I * Benehts - lIlC1ude benef~ts for all full-time, Cla'ltract and part-time eIrF10yees of the Infonnation and Etlucati.on D1VJ.s~cn 82 09 28 Page ~ 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM: Community Relations - Information - General PURPOSE To provide brochures, still and motion picture photographic materials, exhibits and special functions to implement the internal and external general information program of the Authority 1983 OBJECTIVES _ To maintain the level of service provided in 1982 FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and 45% being funded from the general levy on all participating municipalities for publications and printing, photographic materials, tours and special days, applicable to Water and Related Land Management programs~ and financed on a 50% Province of Ontario grant and 50% general levy for all Conservation and Land Management programs FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials SalariGs Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 58,400 23,100 8l,500 82 09 28 > 1983 BUI:GET ESTIM1\TES Page VII-7 DIVISICN Information and Ellucaticn Pro.:J...aw: Camnnity RelatiCXlS - Informaticn - General I I I 1 1983 BU[X;ET SOORCES CF F'llWCIm I 1982 BlIOOEl' 1982 J\CI'UAIS I 1 ~ I NEI' PFOVIN::IAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I EXPENDrroRES RE.VmUES I EXPENDI'l'ORZS GRAN!' 1 lEV'f c::;mm I EXPF1IDI'lURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES I RE.VENUES I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ $ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I $ I I I I I I PublicatiCl'lS & I 1 I Printing 47,200 47,200 25,960 21 , 240 I 39,800 I I I I I POOtographic 1,700 1,700 935 765 I 1,200 I 1 I I 1 Tc:urs & Special I I 1 Days l4,600 14,600 8,030 6,570 I 13,100 I t I I I IMotion Picture I I I Program I 12,000 / 12,000 6,000 6,000 I 12,000 I 1 1 1 Exhibits 5,000 I 5,000 2,500 I 2,500 4,000 I 1 I I I I I Prarotiooal I I I I I~ l,ooo I I 1,000 500 1 500 l,ooo I I I I 1 Biennial I I I Calference I I 3,000 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I , I I I 'IUI'AL I 81, SOD I I 81, SOD I 43,925 I 37, 575 I I 74,100 I I 82.10.05 Page VII-8 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM Community Relations - Information - Resource Management Programs PURPOSE To provide information to the general public and specific audiences with respect to Authority Resource Management Programs 1983 OBJECTIVES - To increase the number of technical/semi-technical bulletins published. - To arrange for resource management tours and seminars FUNDING This is a shared program. 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and 45% being fu~ded from the general levy on all participating municipalities FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities . Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 9,500 1,500 11 , 000 82.09 28 > Page VII-9 1983 BUOOEI' ESTIM1\TES DIVISION Infonnation and lliucation Program: C'amnJnity Relations - Infonnatioo - Resource Management Programs I I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOET I OOURCES CF F'IN1INCING I 1982 BUOOET 1982 l\CI'l!ALS I I ACl'IVI'IY I I I NET I poovrocIAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRANl' I UN'{ 1 0l'HER I EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES EXPmDrroRES I REVmUES I I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ I $ 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I IWatershed Plan I I I I I I 1 I Projects I I 1 I 1 I I 1 Presentations I 6,500 I 6,500 3,575 I 2,925 I I 6,000 I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I Sani -Technical 1 I I I I 1 I I P'-.mlications 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I Re Watershed I I I I I 1 I I Programs I 4,500 I 4,500 2,475 I 2,025 I 1 4,000 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 'lUI'AL I 11,000 I 11,000 6,050 4,950 I 1 10,000 1 I I I 82 08 11 Page VII-I0 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM Community Relations - Information - Planning/Marketing Analysis PURPOSE To provide an effective communications program to maintain or increase visitation to Authority public use facilities 1983 OBJECTIVES - To review and revise the communications program based on the results of studies during 1982 - To implement a comprehensive m~r~eting program FUNDING Funding is provided 100% by municipal levy on all participating municipalities. FINA.~CIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 90,243 90,243 82 09 28 Page VII-ll 1983 BUIX;ET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education Program: Carrnunity Relations - Information - Planning/Marketing Analysis I I I I I I I 1983 BUIX;ET I SOURCES CF FllilAN:ING I 1982 BUIX;ET 1982 ACI'UALS I I lICl'IVI'IY I I I NEl' I PROVIN::IAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REVmUES I EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' I WJ'{ I ornER I EXPENDrroRES I REVENUES EXPENDI'IURES REVENUES I I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ $ I I I I 1 I I I I I IMarketing Plan I I I I I I I I I and Research I 90,243 I I 90,243 I 90,243 I I 36,000 I I I I I I I I I I Supp:>rt I I I I I I 32,000 I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I Supplies 1 I I I I 1 18,000 ! I I I 1 I I I I I Prarotion and I I I I I I I I Advertising I I I I 1 I 39,000 i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'rol'AL 90,243 I 90,243 I 90.243 I 1 l25,000 I I I I 82 09 28 Page VII-12 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM Community Relations - Conservation Education - Supervision, Operations & Maintenance PURPOSE To provide an outdoor conservation education program for school students and other community groups at four (4 ) residential conservation field centres and a variet.y of outdoor and conservation education opportunities for the general public and school groups at Cold Creek, Bruce's Mill and Black Creek 1983 OBJECTIVES - To continue the program at the same level of service as in 1982 - To provide an outdoor and conservation education program for the following estimated number of students and adults: Conse~vation Field Centres 12,000 (Residential) Cold Creek, Black Creek & General Interpretive Programs 81,000 _ To complete major maintenance at the Albion Hills Conservation Field Centre ?UNDING Program revenues and the general levy on all participating municipalities A surplus or deficit on the operations of the Boyd a:1d Lake St. George Conservation Field Centres will, by agreement, be charged or credited to the participating Boards of Education The cost of supervisory staff at Albion Hills, Boyd, Lake St George and Claremont is funded by a 55% grant from the Province of Ontario, 45% being funded from t.he general levy on all participating municipalities FINANCIAL COMM~~TS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 444,500 90,000 19,000 484,183 1,037,683 82 09 28 Page VII-13 1983 Burx;E!' ESTlWI.TES DIVISICN Infonnation and Ei:lucation Program: Carmunity Relations - Ca'lsenraticn Ei:lucaticn - SUpervision, Operations and Maintenance I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' I sxmcES CF FINAN:IID 1982 BUOOET I 1982 J\C'ruALS I I lICl'IVI'IY I I I NET I PR:lVm:IAL MWICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' IEV'l I 0'l'Hm EXPENDI'roRES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I I I $ I $ I $ I $ $ I $ $ $ I $ I $ I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I Program 1 I I I I 1 I I Supervision I lO6,873 I I. 106,873 I 58, 780 48,093 I 118, SOD I I I I I I , I I IBoyd C.P.C. I 160,600 1 l47,6OO I 13,000 1 13,000 I l47,000 147,0001 I I 1 I I I 1 ILake St. ~ 1 288,300 I 3Ol,300 I (13,000) I (l3,000) I 287, 000 287,0001 I I I 1 1 I IAlbion Hills I 197,800 1 197,8OO 1 1 19l,000 191,0001 1 I I I I I I Clarenont I 197,800 1 197,800 I 1 19l,OOO 19l,0001 I I I I 1 I lCold Creek F.C. I 36,000 I 36,000 I 1 40,000 40,0001 I I I I 1 I IGen.Interpretive 1 20,400 1 20,400 I I 17,800 17,8001 I I 1 I 1 1 IB.C P V 1 I I I I I (TOurs & PLP) * I * 147,950 I * 16l.-SQO I 1 I * 174,450 I * 179,700 1 I r I 1 I I IMajor Mtce.: I I 1 I 1 I I Albion I 29,910 I I 29,910 I 29,910 1 29,464 I I Cl.arerront I I 1 I 1 16,000 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 i I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 'lUl'AL I 1,037,683 1 900,900 I 136,783 I 58,780 I 78,003 I 1,037,764 I 873,800 * 'lbese 8IIO.mts are included in the Histori.:oal Sites Divisial anget, and do not add to totals here. 82.l0.05 Page VII-14 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM Community Relations - Conservation Education - Supervision, Operations and Maintenance - Kortright PURPOSE To provide a conservation education program for the public, school and other community groups at the Kortright Centre for Conservation 1983 OBJECTIVES - To provide program opportunities to 20,000 visitors over 1982 level, bringing visitation to approximately 100,000. F~DING Direct program costs are funded from fees, revenues for services, food and sale of merchandise Basic operations are funded by a Ministry of Natural Resources grant of 55% on the Supervisor's salary, an M T R.C F grant of $20,000 from the Growth Endowment Fund, with the remainder from the general levy on all participating municipalities FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Merchandise & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents for Resale TOTAL $ 390,000 33,400 7,800 90,613 93,600 6l5,413 82.09.28 Page Y!!.::!2. 1983 BUI:GET ESTIMi\TES DIVISICN Infonnation and Etlucation PLog1:81n: Camlunity Relations - Calservation Etlucation - Supervision, Operations and Maintenance - Kortright I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' 1 SOORCES CF f'INllJi(:!m 1982 BUOOEl' 1982 1lCl'UAI.S I I 1CITI/IT'l NET PFOVINCIAL MlNICIPAL I I I I EXPENDI'lURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRAN!' IZV'i 1 0Imll. EXPENDI'lURES REVENUES EXPENDI'lURES 1 REVENUES I I $ $ $ $ $ I $ ~ $ $ $ I 1 I I IBasic Operations 217,400 217,400 19,14O l61,547 1 36,713* 193,000 I I I 1 I Prc:lgrwIs - I I I General 298,013 339,100 (4l,a37) (41,a37) I 200,000 232,150 I 1 I I 11983 Portion of I 1 I the Renewable I I I Energy PLogXalh lOO,ooo** 100,000 I 100,000 l35,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 'IOl'AL I 615,413 I 339.l00 276,313 I 19,140 l20,460 I 136,713 I 528,000 232,150 I I * $10, 800 Growth Ehdowrtent E\Jnd 25,913 M.N.R. Fish & Wildlife 1.greanent $36,713 ** Ministry of Energy funding for 1983. - 82.10.05 Page VII-16 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Information and Education PROGRAM community Relations - Conservation Education - Development PURPOSE To develop the facilities required for the Authority's outdoor and conservation education programs 1983 OBJECTIVES: - To continue development of trails, outdoor exhibits and demonstrations at the Kortright Centre for Conservation; - To develop additional indoor exhibits, furnishings and equipment for the Kortright Centre for Conservation - To develop additional residential conservation field centre accommodation at Albion Hills to be funded by The Etobicoke Board of Education FUNDING The outdoor development of the Kortright Centre for Conservation has been funded by a 55% grant from the Province of Ontario, and 45% from the general levy on all participating municipalities until the end of 1981 Provincial priorities did not permit a grant from the Province of Ontario in 1982 Completion of the development of the Kortright Centre is required to meet resource management objectives, to increase visitation by 20,000 per year, to meet inflationary and service costs and to annually reduce t.he municipal levy. Funding for the outdoor development, exhibits, furnishings and equipment for this Centre will be required from The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation and other sources FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 36,000 19,000 23,000 22,000 100,000 82.09 28 Page ~ 1983 BULGET FSTIMi\TES DIVISICN Information and Etlucation Program: Camlunity Relations - Conservation Etlucation - DevelOl:ment I I I I i I I 1983 BUJ:X3ET OOURCES CF FINAN::lNG I 1982 BULGEr 1 1982 ACTUALS I I lICl'IVIT'l I I I NET ProVINCIAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPlli'DlTURES I REVENUES I EXPmDlTURES GRANl' I I.EVY: I OI'HER I EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES I EXPmDI'IURES REVTh.'UES I I I $ I $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $. I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I Kortright I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I Developrrent I 100,000 I I 100,000 I I 100,000* I 100,000** I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Furnishings, I I I I I I I I I I Exhibits, I I I I I 1 I I I I Equi~t I I I I I I 56, 500 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I Conservation I I I I I I 1 I I I I Field Centre I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I General Upgrade I I I I I I I 24 , 000** I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I ! I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDI'AL I 100,000 I I 100,000 I I I 100,000 180, 500 I I * PUnding sources unccmnitted at this ti.lte. ** Provincial grant not approved. 82.0928 Page VIII-l 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES THE HISTORICAL SITES DIVISION This Division is responsible for the Heritage Conservation program, including the development and administration of the Black Creek Pioneer Village, Albion House, historical markers and other historical buildings coming under the jurisdiction of the Authority 82.08.06 Page VIII-2 1982 ACHIEVEMENTS Operated all buildings at Black Creek Pioneer Village with interpretive staff and maintained grounds with own force and volunteer labour. . Maintained and improved provision of special events and programs. Produced a comprehensive staff handbook. . Reviewed results of visitor survey and developed recommendations to improve communications and visitor services. . Commenced a program of local community youth involvement through the assistance of the Federal government. . Prepared an Operating Plan for Black Creek Pioneer Village for 1983-86. 1983 PRIORITIES . To continue to operate all buildings at Black Creek Pioneer Village with interpretive staff and maintain grounds in a cost-effective manner . To increase public awareness of Black Creek Pioneer Village by increased communications with special groups and local community. . To maintain and improve programs and special events. . To continue to develop staff skills in interpretation and conservation techniques. . To respond to visitor needs for improved food services, gift shop accommodation, student assembly and student/public orientation. 82.08.09 Page VIII-3 1983 BUOOEI' ESTIM1\TES DIVISI<N: Historical Sites I , I I 1983 BUOOEI' I s:xJRCES CF FllWI::Im 1 1982 BUOOEI' 1982 JICltIMS I PROOR1lM I NET I PROVIN::IAL I MlNICIPAL I I I EXPENDITURES I RE.VENUE5 EXPENDrroRES I GRAm' I I.EV'l OIHER I EXPENDrroRES REVENUES EXPENDrroRES REVENUES I $ I $ $ $ I $ $ I $ $ $ $ I I I 1 1 Program I I I I Administratia1 280,800 280,800 lO4,4OO I l76,4OO I 248,700 I 1 1000rations & I I Maintenance 1,567,200 1,125,000 442,200 240, 200 202,0001 1,492,000 1,040,5001 I 1 I ICCnservatia1 I I I Educatioo - I I I Supervisi.cn l47,95O 163,500 (lS,550) (15,550) I 174,450 179,700 I I I Capital I I Develq:uent 2,270,000 2,270,000 2,270,000 1,930,000 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I - 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'lUmL I 4,265,950 I 1,288,500 2,977 ,450 1 104,400 401,050 2,472,000 3,845,150 I 1,220,200 82.09.27 Page VIII-4 1.983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Historical Sites PROGRAM: Heritage - AdministratiQn PURPOSE To provide supervisory and support services to implement the heritage conservation program. 1983 OBJECTIVES: _ To provide the support services at the same level as in 1982. FUNDING Provincial and municipal funding. FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial " Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents !!!.!.!. Expenses TOTAL $ 275,000 5,800 280,800 82.09.27 Page VIII-5 1983 BUOOET E5TIM7\TES DIVISICN Historical Sites Program: Heritage - Jl.dministration I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' I 3XlRCES CF ~ 1982 BUOOEl' 1982 JlCI\1l\LS I I NJrIVI'IY NEl' I PRJIJIN:IAL I MlIIICIPAL I I I EXPENDITURES RE.Vmll!S EXPENDI'IURFS I GRANl' LEIl'I 0l'BllR EXPENDl'IURES REVENUES EXPENDI'IURFS I RE.VENUES I I ~ III ~ I III ~ , III ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 I I 1 I Salaries 45,000 45,000 I 22, 500 22, 500 40,900 I I I I Benefits 158,000 158,000 79,000 79,000 147,000 1 I I Travel 5,000 5,000 2,900 2,900 5,000 I Vacatial, Sick & Statutory Iilliday Pay 72,000 72,000 72,000 55,000 I t I I I I I I I 'lUl'AL 280,800 280,000 104,400 176,400 248,700 - ~ I 82.09.27 Page VI II-6 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Historical Sites PROGRAM Heritage - Operations and Maintenance - Black Creek Pioneer Village PURPOSE: To provide a living portrayal of a crossroads village in pre-Confederation Ontario. 1983 OBJECTIVES _ To continue to provide an educational, recreational experience for visitors to this heritage conservation project. _ To increase attendance by 15,000 over 1982 _ To provide a staff person to implement the recommendations of the 1982 marketing plan specific to the Village, particularly through increasing communications to tourists, conventions and special groups. _ To continue to operate the Village in a cost-effective manner through reliance on existing staff, volunteer forces and increased local involvement: to maintain visitor spending: to review food services. _ To develop and implement special events and programs to attract visitation _ To provide staff development and training! maintain collection: review conservation teChniques. FUNDING 72% of toe funding comes from admission receipts, sales outlets and other Village operations. The remainder comes from municipal levy (15 3%) and balance by grant from the Ontario Ministry of Citizenship and Culture. FINANCIAL COMMENTS The budget estimates include funding for the recommendations of the Black Creek Operating Plan prepared in 1982, including enrichment of special programs and marketing staff. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL $ 968,100 312,900 286,200 1,567,200 82.09.27 1983 BUOOET ESTIMM'ES Page Y!!!=I DIVISICN Historical Sites Program: Heritage - ~tioos am Maintenance - Black Creek Pioneer Village I I I I I 1983 BUOOET &JJRCES CF FINl\N:IN3 I 1982 BUOOET I 1982 ~ 1 I N:rIVIT'l I NET PROVIN:IAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I 1 EXPENDI'lURES RE.VENUES I EXPEND:rroRES GRAm' I IEV'l Ollim I EXPENDI'lURES REVENUES I EXPENDrroRES I lUMNUES I $ $ I $ $ I $ $ I $ $ I $ I $ I Supervisioo S05,100 5,000 I 500,100 I 343,100 157,000 445,000 5,0001 I I I 1 1 I I CostIJll'e Dept. 23,500 1,000 22,500 I 22,500 22, 500 1,0001 I I I 1 1 I Registrar 1 34,500 2,000 32,500 1 I 32,500 31, 500 2,0001 I I I 1 I t IGateh:luse 1 24, 500 566,000 (541,500) I (541,500) 26,300 536,0001 1 I I 1 I GiftsbJp-Entrance I 166,000 225,000 (59,000) I (59,000) 144,500 l66,oool I I I I I Giftshop-M..1seum I 42,500 SO, 000 (7,500) (7,500) 60,400 80,0001 I I 1 I I WErldin;s I 8,800 20, 000 (11,200) (11,200) 11,500 I 22,0001 1 I I I I Special E.Wnts I 40, 000 I 8,000 32,000 32,000 39,000 I 2,0001 1 I I I I 1 Livestock I 97,000 I 5,000 92, 000 92,000 88, 500 I 5,0001 1 I I 1 I ICarpenter Shop 1 20, 000 I 500 19,500 I 19,500 14,600 5001 1 I I I I I Peacxx::k Woods 1 6,000 I 6,000 I (4,000) 10,0001 10,000 I 1 I I I I I IFcx:xi ~tioo I 14,000 I 55,000 (41,000) I (41,000) I 14,000 SO, 0001 1 I I I I I 1 I Ncn-Designated I I I I 1 I 1 Areas I 41,000 1 41,000 I 6,000 I 35,0001 41,200 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I Sleigh Rides I 500 I 2,000 (1,500) I (1,500) 1 I 500 l,oool I I I I I 1 I 19.1ildin; 1\cti vi t. I 543,800 I 185,500 358,300 I 358,300 I I 542,500 170,0001 I I I I I J I I rorAL I 1,567,200 I 1,125,000 442,200 1 240,200 I 202,0001 1,492.000 '1.040.5001 82.09.27 Page VIII-8 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISIONI Historical Sites PROG RAM Heritage - Education Program PURPOSE To provide conservation education opportunities for school groups by group tours and by a pioneer Life program. 1983 OBJECTIVES: To maintain existing levels of service for 60,000 students combined in both Tour and Pioneer Life Programs. FUNDING: The program is planned to be self-sustaining. FINANCIAL COMMENTSI OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses TOTAL Pioneer Life Program 36,500 12,600 7,400 56,500 Educational Tours 82,000 9,450 91,450 82.08.12 - Page ~ 1983 BUOOET ESl'IW.TES DIVISI<N: Historical Sites Program: Heritage - mucation Program. I I I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' I saJRCES (J! FINMI:~ 1982 BUOOEl' I 1982 AC'rul\LS I I lICl'IVJ!r'l I I NEl' I PRJVm:IAL I MlBICIPAL I I I I I EXPENDrroRES I REVENtJm I EXPENDrroRES I GRI\Nl' I Iz.J'l 0l"Hm EXPENDl'l'UlUS I REVENtJm I EXPENDI'lUR!S REVENtJm I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ $ I $ I $ $ I I I I I I I I I I Pioneer Life I I I I 1 I I I Program 56, 500 I 44,500 I. 12,000 I I 12,000 70, 750 I 40,9501 I I I I I I I I Imucatiaml I I I I I I Tours 91,450 119,000 (27,550) I I (27,550) 103,700 I 138,750 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I rorAL 147,950 163, 500 (15,550) I (15,550) 174,450 179,7001 I 82.CS.12 Page VIII-10 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Historical Sites PROGRAM: Heritage - Capital Development PURPOSE: To carry out restoration and development work at the Black Creek Pioneer Village in accordance with approved plans. 1983 OBJECTIVES: _ To complete restoration of the Richmond Bill Manse, Sawyers House and Nesbitt Sawmill. _ To dismantle the Tinsmith's Shop and reconstruct at the Village. _ To commence construction of the Visitors' Centre. FUNDING: Funding sources for the capital development are expected to be the The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation, Wintario, and special municipal contributions for the Visitors' Centre. FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utili ties Equipment Property & Rents !!!!!. Expenses TOTAL $ 2,270,000 2,2.70,000 ~ 82.08.11 Page VIII-ll 1983 BUOOET ~TES DIVISICN Historical Sites Program : Heritage - Capital Developtent 1 I I I I I 1983 BUOOET 9:XlRCES (F FnWt:Im I 1982 BUI:GEl' 1982 1CI'l1A1S I I I>CrIVI'I"l I I NET proVINCIAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I E><PENDITURES I REVENUES E><PENDITURES GRAN!' I J.Zo8 1 0l'HER I E><PENDI'l'URES I REVENUES EllPENDITURES I REVENUES I I I $ I $ $ $ I $ $ I $ $ $ I $ I I I I I I 1 I INesbitt Sa\.mUl I 85,000 I 85,000 I 85,0001 lOO,ooo I I c I I I I 1 I I IVisitOrs Centre I 1,800,000 I 1,800,000 I 1,800,0001 1,800,000 1 1 I I I I I .r I I Tinsmith I 75,000 I 75,000 I 75,0001 1 I I I I I I I I I Security I 275,000 I 275,000 I 275,0001 I I 1 I I I I I I I I Riclm::n:l Hill I I I I I I 1 Manse and I I I I I I I Sawyers Ib.18e 35,000 I I 35,000 I 35,000 30, 000 I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'lOrAL I 2,270,000 I 1 2,270,000 I I I 2,270,0001 1,930,000 I I I 82.~.1l A-72 SCHEDULE "B" PROPOSED AHENDMEN'fS TO ONTARIO REGULATION #139/80, REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THE CONSERVATION AUTI10RITIES flCT, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1983 PRESENT REGULATION PROPOSED REGULATION 2 (1) For parking in all Conservation Areas 2 (1) For parking in all Conservation Areas except Black Creck, Palgrave and except Black Creek, Palgrave, Woodbridge, Woodbridge and except Claremont and Claremont, during the winter season, (a) for one vehicle carrying less than (a) for one vehicle carrying less than 10 passengers, 10 passengers, (1) weekends and holidays, per (i) weekends and holidays, per day .. $3.00 day . . $3.00 (ii) weekdays, excluding holidays, (ii) weekdays, excluding holidays, per day . . $2 00 per day . $2.00 (b) for an annual parking permit for (b) for an annual parking permit for one vehicle carrying less than 10 one vehicle carrying less than 10 passengers, per year $ 30 00 passengers, per year $ 30 00 (c) for one vehicle carrying 10 or ( c) for one vehicle carrying 10 or more passengers, per day, more passengers, per day, $20 00 . . $20 00 (21 For a permit at Glen Haffy Extension, (2) For a permit at Glen Haffy Extension, (a) for the use of ea.::h fishing pond, (a) for the use of each fishing pond, including vehicle parking for not including vehicle parking for not more '-han 20 vehicles, per da}, more th~n 20 vehicles, per day, $80 00 . . . $84 00 (b) for parking, for el'ch vehicle in (b) for parking, for each vehicle in additio~ to the 20 ,ehicles for addition to the 20 vehicles for which a fee is paid under Clause which a fee is paid under Clause (a) , {a) , (i) weekends and holidays, per (i) weekends and holidays, per day . . $3 00 day .. $3.00 (ii) weekdays, excluding holidays, (ii) weekdays, excluding holidays, per day . . $2.00 per day . $2 00 (e) for the use of row boats, including (c) for the use of rCM boats, including lifejackets and oars, when used life jackets and oars, when used in conjunction with a permit issued in conjunction with a permit issued under Clause (a) plus provincial under Clause (a) plus Provincial Retail Sales Tax, per pond, Retail Sales Tax, per pond, per day $20.00 per day . $ 21. 00 (d) for the use of the cabin, when (d) for the use of the cabin, when used in conjunction with a permit used in conjunction with a permit issued under Clause (a), per issued under Clause (a), per day... $25 00 day . . $26.00 6. (1) For the rental of a row boat including 6 (1) For the rental of a row boat including lifejackets and oars, in a Conservation lifejackets and oars, in a Conservation Area except Glen Ha~fy Extension, plus Area except Glen Haffy Extension, plus Provincial Retail Sales Tax, per provincial Retail Sales Tax, per hour . $3 00 hour . . $3.15 (2) For the rental of a canoe, including (2) For the rental of a canoe, including lifejackets and paddles, plus lifejackets and paddles, plus Provincial Retail Sales Tax, Provincial Retail Sales Tax, (a) per hour $3.50 (a) per hour . $ 3 65 (b) per day $15.00 (b) per day . . $ 15.75 A-73 PRESENT REGULATION PROPOSED REGULATION 6 (3) For canoeing instructions for a group of 6 (3) For canoeing instructions for a group of at least 5 people, with a reservation, at least 5 people, with a reservation, including the use of a canoe, l! fe- including the use of a canoe, life- jackets and paddles, per group member, jackets and paddles, per group member, (a) half-day . $4 00 (a) half-day $4.20 (b) per day . . . $ 7.00 (b) per day . $7 35 (4) For canoeing instruction courses for (4) For canoeing instruction courses for individuals including the use of a canoe, individuals including the use of a canoe, lifejackets and paddles, per course, lifejackets and paddles, per course, per person . $40 00 per person $42 00 (5) For group canoeing instruction, other (5) For group canoeing instruction, other than a group with a reservation, for a than a group with a reservation, for a one hour lesson, per person, one hour lesson, per person, $2 75 . . $ 2.90 9. (1) For a permit to occupy a specially 9 (1) For a permit to occupy a specially designated group overnight campsite, designated group overnight campsite, including parking for up to seven including parking for up to seven nights, nights, (a) for a group of no more than 20 (a) for a group of no rrore than 20 persons, per night . $10 00 persons, per night $11 00 (b) for each person, in addition to the (b) for each person, in addition to the 20 persons for whom a fee is paid 20 persons for whom a fee is paid under clause (a), per night, under clause (a), per night, . . $ 50 $ .55 (2) For aL permit to occupy a grouJ day-camp (2) For a permit to occupy a group day-camp site .lncluding pa.~king, per person, site :.ncluding parking, per person, per day . $ 50 per day . . $ 55 1) For a permit to occupy an individual 10. For a permit to occupy an individual campsi te, campsite, (a) at Albion Hills and Cold Creek (a) at Albion Hills and Cold Creek Conservation Areas, per night, Conservation Areas, per night, . . . $7 00 . . $7 00 (b) at the Indian Line Tourist (b) at the Indian Line Tourist Campground, per night, $8.00 Campground, per night, $8 00 (c) at Albion Hills Conservation Area, tc) at Albion Hills Conservation Area, per season . $ 320 00 per season . $336 00 17 Except at the Black Creek Pioneer 17. Except at the Black Creek pioneer Village for a permit for a group Village for a permit for a group picnic, not including vehicle parking, picnic, not including vehicle parking, (a) for a group of not more than 100 (a) for a group of not rrore than 100 persons .. . $10 00 persons $10 00 (b) for each 50 persons or fewer persons (b) for each 50 persons or fewer persons in addition to the 100 persons for in addition to the 100 persons for whom a fee is paid under clause (a) whom a fee is paid under clause (a) .. . $5 00 . $5 00 (c) for the use of a shelter, when (c) for the use of a shelter, when available, in addition to any other available, in addition to any other fees paid under this item, per day, fees paid under this item, per day, . . $25 00 $25 00 (dl for a fire in a ground fire pit (d) for a fire in a ground fire pit designated for that purpose, in designated for that purpose, in addition to any other fee paid under addition to any other fee paid under this item, per day $10.00 this item, per day $10 00 (e) for the use of a portable bargeque unit, when available, in addition to any other fee paid under this item, per day $25 00 A-74 PRESENT REGULATION ProPOSED RLGULATION lB. For use of the Petticoat Creek swimming lB. For the use of the Petticoat Creek swinnning area, area, (a) per person, per day.. $ 50 (a) per person, per day . $ 55 (b) for a book of 10 tickets, (b) for a book of 10 tickets, . $4.00 . $4 50 21. For co~rcial photography or filming 21 For commercial photography or filming in any Conservation Area, except that in any Conservation Area, except that part of the Black Creek Conservation part of the Black Creek Conservation Area known as Black Creek Pioneer Area known as Black Creek Pioneer Village, Village, (a) for the use of the grounds and (a) for the use of the grounds and environs, excluding staff and environs, excluding staff and equipment, per hour $20 00 equipment, per hour . $25 00 (b) for participation by staff of the (b) for participation by staff of the Authority, Authority, (i) during the usual working ( i) during the usual working hours of the staff member, hours of the staff member, per person, per hour, per person, per hour, . . $12 00 . . $15.00 (ii) after the usual working hours (ii) after the usual working hours of'the staff member, per of the staff member, per person, per hour, person, per hour, . .. $17 00 . $22 00 (c) for Ilse of Authod ty vehicles or (c) for a~e of Authorjty vehicles or tractors, including Authority staff tract,)rs, including Authority staff to opO!rate such vuhicles or tzactors, to operate such vehicles or tractors, (i) during the us':lal working hours (i) during the usual working hours of the staff member, per vehicle, of the staff member, per vehicle, per hour, .. $20 00 per hour, . $30 00 (ii) after the usual working hours (ii) after the usual working hours of the staff member, per vehicle, of the staff member, per vehicle, per hour .. . $25.00 per hour . $35 00 28. For the use of a manual trap at the Cold 28 For the use of a manual trap at the Cold Creek Conservation Area for use by up to Cr~ek Conservation Area for use by up to five persons, five persons, (a) on Saturdays and holidays in the (a) on weekends or holidays in the summer season, maximum of 1 hour summer season, maximum of 1 hour, .. . $3.00 ... . $4.00 (b) on SlUldays, in the summer season, (b) on weekdays, other than holidays, maximum 0 f 1 hour . $4 00 in the summer season and on any day during the winter season, (c) on weekdays, other than holidays, . $4 00 in the summer season . $3 00 (d) on any day during the winter season, . $3 00 31. Subject to paragraphs 33 and 34, for the 31 Subject to paragraphs 33 and 34, for the rental of ski equipment, when available, rental of ski equipment, when available, consisting of skis, boots and poles, consisting of skis, boots and poles, for cross-country skiing, (a) for cross-country skiing, (i) for individuals fifteen years (1) for individuals fifteen years of age or over, plus Provincial of age or over, plus Provincial Retail Sales Tax, per day, Retail Sales Tax, per day, A-75 PRESENT REGULATION PROPOSED REGULATION 31 (a) (i) 31 (i) 1 up to and including 1 00 P m. 1 up to and including 1 00 P m. . .. $7.00 $7 35 2. after 1 00 P m. . $5 00 2. after 1 00 P m $5.25 (11) for individuals under fifteen (ii) for individuals under fifteen years of age, plus Provincial years of age, plus Provincial Retail Sales Tax, per day Retail Sales Tax, per day 1. up to and inclUding 1 00 P m. 1 up to and including 1 00 P m. . $5.00 . . $5 25 2 after 1 00 P m $3.50 2 after 1 00 P m $3 65 (b) For downhill skiing excluding the use of the ski lift: (i) for individuals fifteen years of age or over, plus provincial Retail Sales Tax, per day, 1 up to and including 1 00 P m. . $7 00 2. aft(!r 1:00 p m. . . $5 50 (ii) for individuals under fifteen years of age, plus Provincial Retail Sales Tax, per day 1 up to and including 1 00 P m. . . $5.00 2 after 1 00 p.m. . $3 50 33 For each individual in a group, with a 33. For each individual in a group, with a reservation for cross-country skiing reservation for cross-country skiing instruction, including the use of instruction, including the use of cross-country ski equipment and ski cross-country ski equipment and ski trails, per day . $6.00 trails, per day $6 30 34. (1) For the use of a ski loft for downhill 34. Fo~ the use of cross-country ski trails skiing, for an individual equipped with at Albion Hills, Bruce's Mill and Cold downhill ski equipment, not including Creek, for an individual equipped with parking, per day $3 00 cross-country ski equipment, not including vehicle parking, per day, { (2) For the use of cross-country ski trails at Albion Hills and Bruce's Mill, for (a) for each person fifteen years of an individual equipped with cross- age or over $1 00 country ski equipment, not including vehicle, parking, per day, (b) for each person under fifteen years of age $ 50 (a) for each person fifteen years of age or over $1 00 (b) for each person under fifteen years of age . . $ 50 ( 3) For the use of a ski lift for downhill skiing for a group with a reservation, a minimum fee of $100 per day, to be charged as follows (a) for the use of the ski lift only, per person .. $2 00 (b) for the use of the ski lift, downhill ski instruction and the rental of downhill ski equipment as described in Item 31, per person . $7 00 A-76 PRESENT REGULATION PROPOSED REGULATION 36 For group cross-country skiing instruction 36 For group cross-country skiing instruction other than a group with a reservation other than a group with a reservation not including parking, for a 1 1/2 hour not including parking, for a 1 1/2 hour lesson, per person . $3.50 lesson, per person $3 65 37 For group downhill skiing instruction, 37 DELETE other than a group with a reservation, not including parking, for a 1 hour lesson, per person . . $4.00 38 For individual one hour lessons for 37 For individual one hour lessons for downhill or cross-country skiing, when cross-country skiing, when available, available, per person . $7 00 per person . . $7 35 ~ A-77 ....." 14;\~ "~1r TaB METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGIGN CONSERVATION AUTHORITY PROPOSED AME~MENTS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1ST, 1983 AND SEPTEMBER 1ST, 1983 TO ONTARIO REGULATION 139/80, AS AMENDED REGULATION MADE UNDER THE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES ACT PRESENT REGULATION PROPOSED REGULATION PROPOSED REGULATION January 1st, 1983 September 1st, 1983 Schedule - Section 22 For school visitations at Black Creek Pioneer village (a) Tours, per student 2 25 2.25- Unguided Tours 1 75 1. 75 (b) Christmas Tour 3 00 3.00 (c) Pioneer Life Program 4 00 4.00 4.25 Schedule - Secbion 23 For entrance to the Kortright Centre for Conservation (a) Ceneral Public Adult s 2.00 2.00 Stude;'1ts 1 00 1.00 (b) S":udents: Regular Program 1. 25 (2 hrs) 1 50 (2~ hrs) Christmas prog. 2 SU 2.50 (c) Family 5.00 5.00 Schedule - Section 30 For guided tour at Bruce's o 75 0.80 Mill Maple Syrup Program Schedule - Section 40 For use of the Cold Creek Conservation Field Centre (a) Students 6.00 6.00 (c) Camping - Site A 3.00 3.00 - Site B 2.00 2.00 Schedule - Section 41 For the Albion Hills C. A. Farm Program (a) Farm Tour - Regular 1.00 1.00 Senior (new program) 2.50 *Ji'roposed Fee (5%) for the Conservation Education Program, per day, at (a) Albion Hills c.F C 678.00 712.00 (b) Claremont c.F C. 678.00 712.00 (c) Boyd C F C 520.00** 546.00** (d) Lake St.George C F C. 520 00** 546.00** * Fee to be negotiated with the Joint Planning Committee, ** Fee for Boyd and Lake St George Conservation Field Centres does not include the cost of seconded teaching staff 'I'RR/mrn A-78 SCHEDULE "C" REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE COMPRISING M D LIPTON, Q C , M M. S"1ITH, Q C , ANDD G FLEET APPOINTED TO CONSIDER MATTERS SPECTING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Pursuant to Resolution Number 14 adopted by the Authority at its meeting of Friday, March 12, 1982, the Com- mittee, together with Mr Jones, Secretary-Treasurer, and Mr. Conlin of Gardiner, Roberts, has met and corresponded on several occasions to discuss the issue of guidelines for Authority members concerning possible conflicts of interest The Commdttee considers that its mandate is confined to the issue of conflicts which can arise under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, in force, and the extent of the modifications or enlargements of such conflicts, if any, which may arise under the new legislation given first reading by the Legislature on March 11, 1982 and which, if passed, will stand in place and stead of the present Municipal Conflict of Interest Act The Committee believes that it is not within its terms of reference to consider the issue of conflicts of interest which may arise by reason of any codes of ethics which may be imposed upon a member as a result of his employment or profession (for example, as a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada) The Committee feels that this is an issue separate and apart from the issue related to possible conflicts of interest which may arise from the operation of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, the terms of which are applicable to all members of Conservation Authorities A-79 -2- The Committee is also of the opinion that the position of members of Conservation Authorities is not equatable to that of directors of non-share or non-profit corporations and that the "conf~ict rules" applicable to directors and officers of corporations under corporation law do not apply The Committee also concluded that it should consider the problem on the assumption that each member has been properly appointed to the Authority pursuant to the statutory provisions for such appointment In the Committee's opinion, the authority of the participating municipalities and the Lieutenant-Governor in Council to select and appoint members to the Authority is not affected by the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act and is not an issue for determination by the Authority Having carefully considered the statute, the Commi ttee has concluded that the Act itself constitutes the guidelines for members of the Authority. The present Municipal Conflict of Interest Act is made applicable to authority members by Section 37 of The Conservation Authorities Act The new leg- islation proposed in Bill 14, assuming that it is enacted in its present form, would repeal Section 37 of The Conservation Authorities Act but will be applicable to authority members since by its terms Conservation Authorities are to be brought within the definition of a "local board" . A-SO -3- A member of the Authority who "has any pecuniary interest, direct or indirect" is required to declare the conflict by disclosure of his interest in the matter which is under consideration by the Authority and to refrain from voting on the matter or attempting to influence the outcome of the vote A pecuniary interest is one relating to a financial ad- vantage which may accrue and for a member to have a pecuniary interest which would put him or her in a conflict position, some financial advantage would have to be likely by reason of the decision being taken by the Authority A pecuniary interest may be direct or indirect, and an indirect pecuniary interest is defined in the proposed legislation to include instances where a member of the Authority is ai shareholder, director or senior officer of a corporation that does not offer its securities to the public (essentially, a private corporation) i or director or senior officer controlling or I directing more than 10% of the voting rights attached to equity shares of a corporation offering its securities to the public (essentially, public corporations) i or . A-81, -4- member or employee of a body; or partner or employee of a person; where that. corporation, body or person, as the case may be, has a pecuniary interest in the matter before the Authority Further, a member of the Authority would be deemed by the proposed legislation to have a pecuniary interest when he or she knows of a direct or indirect pecuniary interest of a parent, spouse or child of that member Append':ld to this report is a copy of Bill 14, currently before the Legislature, which is anticipated to be enacted in due course This copy has been supplied to the members because the Committee believes the explanatory notes and definitions it contains may assist members to make, in each case, wha~ is essentially a subjective decision Whether or not any member of the Authority has a pecuniary interest, direct or indirect, in any matter which is before the Authority, is entirely an issue for the conscience of the member or for the Judge of the County Court in the event an application alleging conflict which has not been declared is launched The Committee concluded that it would be inappro- priate for the Conservation Authority to attempt to set out "guidelines" since the statute is the code itself To do so 0 1 A-82 -5- would be to attempt judicial interpretations of what mayor may not be a conflict in speculative hypothetical situations, an exercise which the Committee felt would be inappropriate. The Committee is of the opinion that the duty imposed on members of the Authority pursuant to Section 5 of the prop- osed legislation is intended to be essentially the same as the duty currently imposed under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act Section 4 of the proposed legislation contains specific exemptions to this duty which are more n~~erous than the corre- sponding exemptions in the existing legislation The Committee notes that Subsection 4(h) of the prop- osed legislation provides an exemption for members of the Authority who are elected municipal councillors so that they may freely deal with matters which come before thei~ respective councils involving the Authority The Committee did note, however, that the proposed new legislation (Bill 14, Section 5(2LI provides that "where a meeting is not open to the public, in addition to ." declaring the conflict, "...the member shall forthwith leave the meeting or part of the meeting during which the matter is under consideration " The Committee considers that no meeting of the < " A-8) -6- Authori ty "is not open to the public" and that, therefore, the section is probably inapplicable to its proceedings However, it is recognized by the Committee that in the practical conduct of the Au~ority's affairs, few members of the public attend its meetings and it is the Committee's view that it becomes a matter of individual choice to be made by any member of the Authority as to whether or not he or she should leave any meeting following disclosure of a conflict of interest. ~ I A-84 , th~ metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes AUTHORITY MEETING 1982 12 15 #6/82 (Special) Meeting #6/82 (Special) of the Authority was held 82 D 15 at the Town of ValH1hdn Municipal Office, 2141 Major Mackenzie Drive, Maple The meeting was calleu to order at 1000 hours in the Council Chamber PRESENT Chairman Dr J K Reynolds Vice-Chairman Mrs Florence Gell Members W G Barber M W H Biggar M J Breen J A Bryson S J Daurio R J Fitzpatrick D G Fleet Mrs F Edna Gardner Robert Gillespie S T Griffiths, RPF Mrs Lois Hancey Gavin Henderson W R Herridge, QC Mrs L D Jackson W J Kelly Eldred King E V Ko1b David Lacey Dr. T H Leith M 0 Lipton, QC S A Macpherson V K McCreary F R Perkins J S Scott G B Sinclair M M Smith, QC Mrs B Sutherland William Sutherland Mrs H 0 Sutter Dr. \'1 M Tovell R F M Yui 11 ABSENT Members J E Anderson Mrs C Bell S W Caldwell Mrs P T Clark D L Cook Edwa rd Fu 1 ton Don Jackson F J McKechnie W G McLean Ms S Nimmo P E Oyler Mrs M Prinsloo John Rupke M M R Stewart Mrs Norah Stoner C E Thompson Mrs Alma Walker MINUTES This being a special meeting, no Minutes were presented A-85 -2- GREETINGS Mrs Lornu Jackson, Mayor of the Town of Vaughan, ,,,elcomed the Authority members to the new Town offices REPORT OF COMMITTEE TO STUDY THF REORGANIZATION OF TfIF AUTHORITY COMMITTEE SYSTEM -CHAIRr-1l\N'S SYNOPSIS Dr Reynol ds made a brief statement on the estilhJ ishment ancl work of the Committec, and called on its Chairman to speak to the matter Mrs Dianne Sutter, Chairman, Committee to Study the Reorganization of the Authority Conunittee System, preceded her motion with a brief resume of the CommittEe's recomm<?ndations, as previously circulated to Authority members Motion Moved by Mrs H D Sutter Seconded by Dr W M Tovell THAT the reorganized structure of the Authority, as outlined in Part II of the Report of the Committee to Study the Reorganization of thc Authority Committee System, as appended as Schedule "A" of these Minutes, be adopted by The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority for implementation at the 1983 Annual Meeting to be held on February 11, 1983 THAT the revised Authority Regulations, as set forth in Part II, Section 2, of this report, be adopted and submitted to the Minister of Natural Resources for approval in accordance with Section 30 of the Conservation Authorities Act, R S 0 1980, c 85~ THAT the Rules "'or the Conduct of the Authority, Section 6, be amended as follo....'s lst paragraph "All proposals for appointment of non-members of the Authority to WATERSHED AND functional Advisory Boards shall be made to the Executive Committee in sufficient time for it to consider the proposals before making its recommendations to the Authority under Regulation l2*~ and" (*presently Regulation 13) 4th paragraph "The Authority may appoint non-members to WATERSHED AND functional Advisory Boards in the following manner~" THAT the Terms of Reference of the Advisory Boards of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, as set forth in Part II, Section 3, of this report, be adopted~ THAT the Meeting Schedule for 1983, as set forth in Part II, Section 4, of this report, based on the recommendations in Part II, Section 1, be approved and that staff be directed to establish the appropriate dates in consultation with the member municipalities~ AND FURTHER THAT Parts I and II of the report, as appended as Schedule "A", be forwarded to the member municipalities for their information THE MOTION WAS NOT VOTED UPON Res #75 Moved by J S Scott Seconded by M W H Biggar THAT the Report of the Committee to Study the Reorganization of the Authority Committee System be dealt with page by page CARRIED~ Motion Moved by: D G Fleet Seconded by S A Macpherson THAT Item 1 of Part II - Section 1 of the report be approved THE MOTION WAS NOT VOTED UPON -3- A-86 Motion Moved by Mrs F Cell Seconded by Mrs L Hancey THAT t.he Report of the Committee to Study the Rf'organization of the Authority Committee System be referred to the Executive co~nittee with direction to form a sub-committee, comprising three members from the Executive and three members from the Author i ty, to consider the report one clause at a time; AND FURTHER THAT the sub-committee report to the Authority on the recommendations of the report THE MOTION WAS ----------------------------------------------------- NOT CARRIED; Res. #76 Moved by W R Herridge Seconded by: Mrs L Hancey THAT the Report of the Committee to Study the Reorganization of the Authority Committee System be referred to a committee of six people, three to be appointed by the Executive committee and three to be members of the Committee to Study the Reorganization of the Authority Committee System; AND FURTHER THAT the six-member committee report to the full Authority at its next meeting CARRIED; Mrs Sutter thanked the members of the Committee for their hard worK, and also the staff who he1ped to assemble the background data. It was unanimously agreed that a letter of appreciation be forwarded to the Town of Vaughan for permitting the Authority to use the Council Chamber and meeting rooms, and for hosting the luncheon TERMINATION The meeting was declared terminated 1982 12.15:1150 J K Reynolds W E Jones Chairman Secretary-Treasurer KC