The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFlood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board 1982 C-1 the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER 11/82 CONSERVATION ADVISORY BOARD 1982 04 30 The Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board met at the Authority office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday, 1982 04 30 10 00 PRESENT Chairman J S Scott Members S J Daurio W.J Kelly L Martin F.J McKechnie W G McLean Mrs M Prinsloo Mrs N Stoner Mrs H D Sutter Chairman of Authority Dr J K Reynolds Vice Chairman of Authority Mrs F Gell ABSENT Vice r.hatrman W R Herriqge, Q C Members D.G. Fleet C F Kline V.K McCreary R.F M Yuill MINUTES Res U Moved by F.J McKechnie Seconded by Mrs N Stoner THAT the Minutes of Meeting 13/81 be adopted as if read CARRIED: PROGRESS REPORT Ree '2 Moved by: Mrs. N Stoner Seconded by L. Martin THAT the Progress Report of the Water Resource Division for the period January 1, 1982 to March 31, 1982 be received CARRIED: Res '3 Moved by L Martin Seconded by Mrs. N. Stoner THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT the Executive Committee express the deep concern of this Board to the Minister of Natural Resources regarding a) the one-year approval process on our multi-year projects, and b) the delay in getting project approval. CARRIED~ KEATING CHANNEL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Ree. '4 Moved by Mrs H.D Sutter Seconded by W.J Kelly THAT the staff report and the draft report titled "Keating Channel Environmental Assessment" be received CARRIED~ C-2 ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS STUDY Res '5 Moved by Mrs N Stoner Seconded by Mrs M. Prinsloo THAT the report titled "Environmentally Significant Areas Study" be received; and THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT the study be forwarded to interested Provincial Ministries, municipalities, agencies and groups for conunent CARRIED: FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROGRAM Res #6 Moved by Mrs H 0 Sutter Seconded by F.J McKechnie THAT the Status Report on the Federal/Provincial Flood Damage Reduction Program be received CARRIED: URBAN MANAGEMENT AND EROSION CONTROL Res #7 Moved by F.J McKechnie Seconded by S J Daurio THAT the Urban Management and Erosion Control Portfolio be received: and T~E BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT the program of offering design construction and maintenance of minor erosion or water control structures to the Authority's member municipalities be endcrsed CARRIED: HYDROLOGY REVIEW Res f8 Moved by Mrs H.D Sutter Seconded by L. Martin THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT staff be directed to prepare terms of reference and retain an engineering consultant to carry out a review of the Authority's hydrology CARRIED: HAMLET OF GOODWOOD - ENGINEERING STUDY Res #9 Moved by Mrs H D. Sutter Seconded by Mrs M Prinsloo THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT the staff proceed with retaining an engineering consultant to carry out the feasibility study on the proposed improvements to the Goodwood Pumping Station CARRIED: FLOOD CONTROL PROGRAM - Proposed Modifications to the Limits of the Unionville Flood Damage Centres - Rouge River The staff advises that this report was considered by the Executive Conunittee at its meeting #5/82 in order that it could be on the agenda for the May 14 Authority meeting Res. #10 Moved by L Martin Seconded by Mrs H.D Sutter THAT the Board concur in the reconunendations regarding the proposed modifications to th e limits of the Unionville Flood Damage Centres - Rouge River CARRIED~ C-3 HUMBER RIVER, BOLTON - REMEDIAL WORK Res .t11 Moved by: Mrs H D Sutter Seconded by Mrs M Prinsloo THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT, if approval of the Land Acquisition project 1982-84, which is currently before the Province of Ontario, is not received at an ~arly date, the Executive Committee request immediate approval by the Province of Ontario of that portion of the Authority's Land Acquisition Program relating specifically to the Bolton Remedial Works Project in order that the project can be proceeded with in 1982. CARRIED: ADJOURNMENT On Motion, the meeting adjourned at 1 00 pm., April 30, 1982 J S Scott WA McLean, Deputy General Manager Chairman for Secretary Treasurer , ) C-4 the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes FLOOD CONTROL & WATER 1982.09 23 It 2/ 8 2 CONSERVATION ADVISORY BOARD - The Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Bo~rd filet at the Town of Cn ledon Municipal Offices, Caledon East, Onto , 1982 09 23 1020 PRESENT Chairman J S Scott Vice-Chairman W.R. Herridge, QC Members L Martin V K McCreary F J McKechnie Mrs II )) SlItter Authority Chairman Dr J K Reynolds Authority Vice-Ch~i~an Mrs F Gell AI3SEN'r Members S.J Daurio D G Fleet W J Kelly Mrs M Prinsloo Mrs. N Stoner R. F.~1 Yuill GREETINGS Mr John Clarkson, Mayor of the Town of Caledon, welcomed the members of the Board and staff, and brought greetings from the members of Council Hr Clarkson congratulated the Authority upon obtaining approval to proceed with the Humber River Channel Improvements in Bolton, and on the purchase of the Eidelweiss property RESPONSE -- Mr J.S Scott, Chairman of the Board, expressed thanYs to Mayor Clarkson for the warm welcome and for the arrangements made by the Town for this meeting and for the Bolton channel ground-breaking ceremony to follow MINUTES Res #12 Moved by F.J. McKechnie Seconded by Dr J.K Reynolds THAT the Minutes of Meeting #l/82 be adopted. CARRIED; PROGRESS REPORT Res U3 Moved by Mrs F Gell SecondeCl by L Hartin TIIA'l' the Progress Report be received with appreciation. CARRIED; WATER TIIEME COORDINATOR'S PROGRESS REPORT The Chairman expressed regrets to Mr Peter AUf ield, Water Theme Coordinator, Kor.tright Centre for Conservation, that due to timp. constraint in connection with the Bolton Channel ground-breakinq ceremony, it wau lei be necessary to nefer the progr.ess Report to n future meeting. C-S -2- CANADA/ONTARIO FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROGRAM -Progress Report ^ verbal presentation of the above was made by Mr. H A. Clarke, Executive Co-ordinator, Lands & Waters Group, Ministry of Natural Resources and Chairman of the Steering Committee of the Canada/Ontario Flood Damage Reduction Program Res. #!4 Moved by Mrs. H.D. Sutter Seconded by W. R. lIerr idge THAT the presentation on the Canada/Ontario Flood Damage Re-uction Program be received with appreciation. CARRIED; 1983 PRELIMINARY BUDGET ESTIMATES Thc Administrator, Water Resource Division, prescntcd the 1983 Preliminary Budget Estimates for the Flood Control Section, which were discussed <It some length by the Board. Res. US Moved by: W R Herridge Seconded by: Mrs II. D. Sutter THAT Pagc V-18 Maintenance of Flood Control Channels be increased to $75,000 from $55,000 CARRIED; Res. U6 Moved by: W R. Herridge Seconded by: Mrs. F. Gell THAT Page V-20 Flood Warning System Equipment/Modelling be increased to $14,500 from $9,000. CARRIED; Res. #17 ~loved by: L. Mar:tin Scconded by: F.J. McKechnie THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT the 1983 Preliminary Budget Estimates for the Flood Control and Erosion Control Programmes, as appended as Schedule "A" of these Minutes, be amended and included in the 1983 Budget Estimatcs of the Authority. CARRIED; PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL & SLOPE STABILIZATION IN llETROPOLITAN TORONTO, 1982-l984 .:.!2...83 Prog r amme Res. U8 Moved by: Mrs. H D. Sutter Seconded by: V.K. McCreary THAT the Progress Report and the Current Priorities be received; AND THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT the 1983 Work Programme and the Current priorities for: Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in Metropolitan Toronto, as appended as Schedule "B" of these Minutes, be approved CARRIED; PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL & SLOPE STABILIZATION IN TUF REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL, 1982-1984 -1983 Programme Res. U9 Moved by Mrs. H D. Sutter Seconded by: V.K. f.lcCreary THAT the Progress Repor:t and the Current Erosion priorities be r.eceived; AND TilE nOARD RECOMMENDS THAT the 1983 Work Programme and the Current Priorities for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in The Regional Municipality of Peel, as appended as Schedule "c" of thcse Minutes, be approved. CARRIED; -3- C-6 PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL & SLOPE STAI3ILIZATION IN THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK, 1982-1984 -1983 Programme Res. 120 Moved by Mrs II D. Sutter Seconded by V K McCreary THAT the Progress Report and the Current Erosion priorities be received1 AND THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TIIA'f the 1983 Work Programme and the Current Prioritics for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in The Regional Municipality of York, as appended as Schedule "D" of these Minutes, be approved. CARRIED1 PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL & SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE REGIONl\L HUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM, 1982-1984 -l983 Programme Res '21 Moved by Mrs II D. Sutter Seconded by: V.K McCreary THAT the Progress Report and the Current Erosion Priorities bc rcceivcd; AND THE BOl\RD RECOMHENDS THAT the 1983 Work progr.amme and the Current Priorities for Erosion Control & Slope Stabilization in The Rcgional Municipality of Durham, as appended as Schedule -E" of these Minutes, be approved. CARRI ED; ADDENDUM TO THE PROJECT FOR CHANNEf. nlPROVEMENTS, MAIN HUMBER RIVER, VH.LAGE OF BOLTO'~, TOWN OF CALEDCN Res. #22 Moved by Mrs. II D. Sutter -- Second ed by: F.J. McI~echnie Tin; BOARD RECOHMENDS THAT the "Addendum to the Project for Channel Improvements, Main lIumber River, Village of Bolton, Town of Caledon, as appended as Schedule "F" of thene Minutes, be approved. AND FURTHER THAT the following action be taken (a) The Government of Ontario be requested to approve the Addendum to the Project and a grunt in the amount of $290,000 00; (b) The Government of Ontario be requested to approve the use of the provincial share of revcnues from the sale of Authority land, in the amount of $106,900 00, in conjunction with the grant 1 tc) When approved, the appropriate Authority officials be authorized to take whatever action is required in connection with the Addendum, including the execution of any necessary documents. CARRIED: MASTER DRAINAGE PLANNING 'rOWN OF WHITCIIURCII-STOUFFVILLE Res. #23 Moved by: Dr. J K Reynolds Seconded by Mrs H D. Sutter THAT the request from the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville for financial assistance in initiating a Master Drainage Planning Study be referred to staff for further discussions with the Town and the South Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority 1 'fIIAT staff determine the extent to which staff assistance and existing information and data could be provided - placing a dollar value thereon - and report to the next meeting of the Board; AND FURTHER THAT the Administrator, Water Resource Division, r.eply to the letter received from the Mayor of the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, advising of the course of action being taken by the Authority. CARRIED; C-7 -4- PROJECT FOR CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ON THE EAST BRANCH OF THE HIGHLAND CREEK Res. '24 Moved by: V.K. McCreary Seconded by: Mrs. H. D. Sutter THE BOARD RECOMMENDS 'I'HAT "A Project for Channel Improvements on the East Branch o[ the Highland Creek", as appendcd as Schedule "G" of these Minutes, be adop ted ; AND FURTHER THAT the following action be taken: (a) The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be designated as the bencf i ting municipality on the basis set forth in the project; (b) The Government of Ontario be requested to approvc thc project and a grant of 55% of the cost; (c) When approved, the appropriate Authority officials be authorized to take whatever action is required in connection with the project, ipclud ing the execution of any necessary documents. <;:ARRIED; On motion, the meeting terminated at 1215 hours in order [or the members and sta ff to attend the ground-breaking ceremony for the Bolton Channel Improvements. J.S. Scott W.E. Jones Chairman Secretary-Treasurcr KC. Page V-l 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES THE WATER RESOURCE DIVISION This Division is responsible for the carrying out of the approved water management policies and prograns of the Authority, as they apply to the river systems, and the Lake Ontario Waterfront, including - administration of the Flood Control Program: - administration of the Waterfront Development and Shoreline Management Program; - administration of the Storm Water Management Program: - the development and operation of the Flood Warning System: - technical advice and direction concerning the enforcement of the Authority's fill regulations and development control; - environmental monitoring and review of flood control and waterfront projects; - the administration of the Authority's Erosion and Sediment Control Program: - the co-ordination of site plans and development with municipalities and Province of Ontario ~ n = ~ 0 C ~ ~ : 82.08.05 > n : I ~ n I ~ Page V-2 1982 ACHIEVEMENTS Provided adequate funding for staff to achieve program objectives Completed final engineering and first phase of construction for Bolton flood control works. Completed flood control channel at Oak Ridges. Completed studies of Palgrave Dam and Goodwood Pumping Station Operated and maintained existing flood control structures~ carried out maintenance on Massey Creek channel Operated and continued improvements to the Flood Warning and Flood Forecasting System Updated hydrological studies and flood plain mapping Provided protection from erosion and slope instability at priority sites in Metropolitan Toronto, Peel, York and Durham; Commenced Highland Creek remedial erosion control works Completed Environmentally Significant Areas study and circulated to member municipalities and interested agencies Completed Environmental Assessment report for Keating Channel remedial measures Reviewed and commented on development proposals: administered Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways regulations . Reviewed and commented on Storm Water Management proposals and reports Completed Humber Bay West Phase II; substantially completed Bluffers Phase II Continued development at Marie Curtis Park 1983 PRIORITIES Flood Control to provide for administration of the Flood Control Program . to complete remedial flood control measures at Bolton to operate and maintain the Flood Warning and Flood Forecasting System. to maintain Flood Control dams to maintain Flood Control channels and structures . to maintain other water control structures. Erosion Control . to carry out remedial measure in Metropolitan Toronto on a priority basis to complete Phase I, Highland Creek remedial measures . to carry out remedial measures in Peel, York and Durham on a priority basis to commence Phase II, Highland Creek remedial measures Shoreline Management to carry out remedial measures on Lake Ontario Shoreline on a priority basis. Environ~ental and Other Studies to undertake pre-engineering studies to commence prppuLation of Master Drainage Plans to update and continue various Watershed studies Lake Ontario Waterfront Development to prov~de for administration of Lake Ontario Waterfront programs to commence work at Samuel Bois Smith Waterfront Area to provide internal access and servicing at East Point . to complete servicing and site stabilization at Bluffers Park . to complete initial development (road access, parking> at Bluffers Toplands to continue Environmental Monitoring Program to provide predevelopment maintenance. 82 08 05 Page V-3 1983 BUI:X;El' EST~TES DIVISICN: Water Resource SEI:l'ICN Flood Control I I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' I SOURCES CE' FINAN:IN:> 1982 BUOOEl' I 1982 ACI'UlUS I I PROORlIM I I NEt' I PROVIN::IAL I MUNICIPAL I I I I I I EXPENDITURFS I REVENUES I EXPENDI'roRES I GRAN!' I IEVY I cmIER EXPrnDI'IURES i P~i;::TSS I EXP:::""':~?J:S I REVTh'UE'S I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ $ I .$ J I $ 1 , I Program I I I I I I I I I I Administration 748,236 I 748,236 I 397, l44 I 339,764 I 11,328 680,640 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Erosion Metro 396,500 11 , 500 I 385,000 I 211,750 I l73,250 I 4l5,OOO I 15,000 I I I , I I I I I I I I I IErosion York 23,500 3,500 I 20,000 I 11, 000 I 9,000 I 21 , 500 I 1,500 I I I I I I I I I I I I IErosion Peel 35,600 5,600 30,000 I l6,500 I l3, 500 I I 32,000 I 2,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Erosion D-lrham 5,000 5,000 I 2,750 I 2,250 I I 5,300 1 300 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Flood Control I I I I I I I I I Planning & I I I I I I I I Rero€dial Narks l,343,500 1,343,500 672,925 I 93,825 I 576,750 I l, 096, 680 ! I I 1 I I I I I I I I I:~'lood Control , I I I I i I I I River I I I I I 1 I I Forecasting l23,117 l23,117 67,714 I 55,403 I I l21 , 000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Flood Control I I I I I i I I I r-<.aintenancej I I I I I I I I I Snall Darns & I I I I I I I I I I O1annels 238,000 I I 238,000 130,900 I 107,100 I I 155,0Q0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TOl'AL 2,9l3,453 I 20,600 I 2,892,853 l,5l0,683 I 794,092 I 588,078 I 2,527,120 I l8,BOO I I I (") 82 OS lO I .... 0 n , .... .... Page ~ 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM: Program Administration PURPOSE To provide administrative, planning, biological and engineering staff necessary for implementing 1983 programs 1983 OBJECTIVES: Complete the 1983 phases of the Water Resource Division programs of flood control, development control and environmental planning and monitoring within the funding limits. FUNDING: This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities FI~ANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 669,936 l5,200 -- -- 63,100 748,236 82.08.10 Page V-5 1983 BtJDGEl' ES'l'lMATES DIVISICN Water Resource /~ICN Flood Control Program: Program Mninistration I I I I I I I I 1983 BUroEl' I SOORCES OF FINAN:ING I 1982 BUroEl' I 1982 AcruAIS I I ACTIVITY I I I NEl' I PRDVIN:::IAL I MUNICIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDI'IURES I GRAN!' I LFN'f I arHER I EXPENDI'roRES I REVENUES I EXPTh"DlTURES I RE.VENUES I I I $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I ISalaries I 560,465 I 560,465 I 295,795 I 253,342 I 11,328 I 522,370 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Be.'1efits I lO9,471 I lO9,471 I 60,209 I 49, 262 I I 110,405 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ITravel I l4,OOO I l4,OOO I 7,700 I 6,300 I I l4, 765 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l'Ehforcerrent I I I I I I I I I I i' Officer Travel I l7,600 I l7,600 I 9,680 I 7,920 I I l4,600 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Technical Maps I I I I I I I I I I I legal I 9,000 I 9,000 I 4,950 I 4,050 I I l5,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IData Processing I 5,500 I 5,500 I 3,025 I 2,475 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Flood Cont-':'ol I I I I I I I I I I I \\orkshop I 3,500 I 3,500 I - I 3,500 I I 3,500 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'Regulations - I I I I I I I I I I Fill & I I I I I I I I I I Construction I 28,700 I 28,700 I l5,785 I l2,9l5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDI'AL I 748,236 I 748, 236 I 397,l44 I 339,764 I 11 , 328 I 680,640 I I I I (') I 82 CB lO ..... IV '"') I I-' W Page V-6 ~983 3GDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Ivater Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRA.\1 Eros~on Control - Metropol~~an ~oronto Pl:<POSE To r-tl"1ii:1ize the hazards of erosion to life and property within ~etropolitan Toronto 1983 OBJECTIVES - To carry out remedial protection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis - To continue to update and augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities Fut-mING T""1.is ...." 3 s~ared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance oe_-g =unCEC :rom the ~e"1e:i~~"1g municipality, being the ~unicipality of Metropolitan Toronto :INANCIA~ COMMENTS -o~2l _cs'" ~cl'...:des expected revenues of $ll 500 OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Survey & Services & Wages Utili ties Equipment Legal & Rents :'OTAL S 77 , 900 l30,000 800 10 000 177,800 396,500 82 ')8 1 '\ Page V-7 1983 BUI::GET ESTIMATES DIVISICN: Water Resource SEX::TICN: Flood Cootrol Program: Erosion Cootrol - Metro I I I I I 1 1983 BUOOEI' SOORCES OF ~ 1982 BUIX;Er I 1982 ACI'U1U.S I I ACI'IVI'lY I I NEl' PROVIN:IAL I MUNICIPAL I I I I I EXPENDI'ruRES REVENUES I EXPEl'IDI'IURES GRAN!' , Wl'l Cfl'HER EXPENDrruRES I R.E\lThlJES I EXPENDI'ItiRES I RE'\1ENUE5 I I $ $ I $ $ I $ $ $ I $ I $ I $ 1 I Administration 43,000 I 43,000 23,650 I 19,350 38,000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I Reredial W:>rks 353,500 11,500 I 342,000 l88, lOO I 153,900 377,000 I l5,OOO I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'rol'AL I 396,500 11 , 500 385,000 .1 211,750 l73,250 I I 4l5,000 I l5,00Q I I I (") I 82 C8 10 to-' .c. n I ..... V1 Page V-8 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION: Flood Control PROGRAM Erosion Control - Peel PURPOSE: To minimize the hazards of erosion to life and property within the Regional Municipality of Peel 1983 OBJECTIVES: - To carry out remedial protection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis - To continue to update and augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities FUNDING: This a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the benefiting municipality, being the Regional Municipality of Peel. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: Total cost includes expected revenues of $5,600. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Su::-vey & & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Legal TOTAL $ 3,000 12,300 16,800 3,500 35,600 82.08 lO Page V-9 1983 BtJOOEl' ESTIMATES DIVISICN: Water Resource SH:TICN: Flood O:lnttrol Program: Erosion Control - Peel I I I I I I 1983 BtJOOEl' I SOORCES OF FINl\N:IN:; I 1982 BtJOOEl' I 1982 ACTUM.S I I ACTIVIT'[ I I NEl' I PROVI~IAL I MtlNICIJ;>lU. I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' I LEW I amrn I EXPENDrn.JRES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I REVENlJE5 I I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I I Administration 4,000 I I 4,000 I 2,200 I l,BOO I I 2,500 I I I I I I I I I I I I Remedial ~ks 3l,600 I 5,600 I 26,000 I l4,3oo I 11,700 I I 29,500 2,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDI'AL I 35,600 I 5,600 I 30,000 I l6,500 I l3,500 32,000 I 2.000 I () I 82 08 l2 ...... C\ n , I-' -...J Page V-lO 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGR&'1 Erosion Control - York PURPOSE To minimize the hazards of erosion to life and property within the Regional Municipality of York 1983 OBJECTIVES - To carry out remedial protection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis - To continue to update and augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities. ~UNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the bal~nce being funded from the benefiting municipality, being the Regional Municipality of York FINANCIAL COMMENTS Total cost includes expected revenues of $3,500 OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Survey & & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Legal TOTAL $ 3,500 8,000 lO,500 l,500 23,500 82 08 l2 Page V-11 1983 BUt'GEl' ~ DIVISICN: Water Resource SR:TICN: Flood Control Program: Erosion Control - York I I I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' &XJRCES OF FINMC~ I 1982 BUDGE!' I 1982 ACI'tN.S I N:rIVIT'l I I NEl' PmVnCIAL I MUNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES REVENUES I EXPWDrroRES GRAN!' I rz.J'{ I ornER I EXPWDrnJRES I RE\TENl.m) I EXPENDITURES I RE\TENl.m) I I $ $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I Administratioo. I 2,000 I 2,000 l,lOO I 900 I I 2,000 I I I I I I I I I I I Ranedia1 W:%ks I 21, 500 3,500 l8,00Q 9,900 I 8,loo I I 19,500 I l,500 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TCTAL ! 23, SOD 3,500 I 20,000 11,000 I 9,000 I 21, 500 I 1, 500 I I (') I 82 08 lO f-' 0) (') I ~ \D Page V-l2 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM Erosion Control - Durham PURPOSE: To minimize the hazards of erosion to life and property within the Regional Municipality of Durham 1983 OBJECTIVES - To carry out remedial protection works in vulnerable valley areas on a priority basis. - To continue to update and augment the current erosion inventory files and priorities FuNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the benefiting municipality, being the Regional Municipality of Durham FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Sa]arif;:s Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 600 2,000 2,400 5,000 82 08 lO Page V-13 1983 BUOOFI' fSl'IM1\TES DIVISICN Water Resource ~ICN: Flood Control Program: Erosion Control - Durham I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' SOURCES OF ~m:; I 1982 BUOOEl' I 1982 ACI'UlUS I I ACI'IVI'lY I I NEl' PROVIN:IAL I MtNICIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES EXPENDIWRES GRANI' I LEVY' C7IHER I EXPENDrn.JR!S I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I I I $ I $ $ $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I IAdministration I 300 I 300 l65 I 135 I 500 I I I I I I I I I I I I Rsnedial Works I 4,700 I 4,700 2,585 I 2,115 I 4,800 I 300 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDI'AL 5,000 I 5,000 I 2,750 2,250 I 5,300 I 300 I I I n , 82 08 10 I\) 0 . . (') I N I-' Page V-l4 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRA.'1 Flood Control Planning and Remedial Measures PURPOSE To undertake a comprehensive program of flood control designed to prevent, eliminate or reduce the risk of hazard to life and property, while cognizant of the natural attributes of the valley system. 1983 OBJECTIVES - To continue to carry out preliminary engineering designs on the Authority's damage centres - To complete flood control remedial works on the Humber River at Bolton - To assist municipalities in the preparation of Master Drainage Plans for storm water management - To continue erosion control measures on Highland Creek FmmING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities, with the exception of the Bolton remedial works where funding is to be provided lOOt by the Province of Ontario FINANCIAL COMMENTS OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & WaCles Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL J $ 5,500 55,000 1,283,000 1,343,500 82 08 10 Page V-l5 1983 BUOOEl' ESTIMM'P.S DIVISICN Water Resource SEC'ICN: Flood Control Program: Flood Control Planni.ng and Rerredi.al Measures I I I I I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' I SXJRCES OF ~m:; I 1982 BlJI)3El' I 1982 ACruAI.S I I N::rIVI'lY I I NEl' I PROVI~L\L I MUNICIPAL I I I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I RE.'VENUES EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' I I.EJY I C1I'HER I EXPENDITURES I RE.'VENUES I EXPTh""DlTURES I R.EVENUES I I I $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I I I I I I I I I I I I I Bolton Rerredi.al I I I I I I I I I I I \U'ks I l,135,000 I l,l35,00Q I 558,250 I I 576,750 I 540,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pre li.:ninary I I I I I I I I I 1 I Ehgineering I 25,000 I 25, 000 I l3,750 I 11,250 I I 54,300 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IMaster Drainage I I I I I I I I I t I Planning I 20,000 I 20, 000 I 11, 000 I 9,000 I I 20,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ehvironrrental I I I I I I I I I I I Studies I l3,SOO I I l3,SOO 7,425 I 6,075 I I 55,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IHighland I I I I I I I I I I I Creek I l50,000 I I 150,000 82,500 I 67,500 I I 100,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IKeating I I I I I I I I I I I O1annel I I I I I I 250,000 I I I I (j I 82.08 10 f\J f\J n I '" w Page ~ 1983 BtlOOEI' ESTIM1\TES DIVISICN: Water Resource ~ICN FloOO Control Program FloOO Control Planning and Ranedi.al Measures I I I I I I I I 1983 BUDGE!' I SXJRCES OF FINAN:IN:; I 1982 BUDGE!' I 1982 ACI'llMS I I ACrIVIT'f I I I NEt' I PROVINCIAL I MlNICIPAL I I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REIlENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRAN!' I I.EV'l I CYI'HER I EXPENDITURES I REIlENUES I EXPrnDITURES I REIlENUES I I I $ I $ I $ $ I $ $ I $ I $ I $ I $ I I I I I I I I I I I 10ak Ridges I I I I I I I I I Channel - I I I I I I I I I Ranedial Works I I I I I 35,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IFloOO Plain I I I I I I I I I r-'.apping I I I I I 42,380 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IDI'AL I 1, 343, 500 I I 1,343,500 672,925 I 93, 825 576,750 I 1, 096,680 I I I I 82 08 lO Page Y.:!1. 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION: Flood. Control PROGRA.Po1 Flood Control Maintenance/Small Dams, Channels, Erosion Control Structures PURPOSE Maintaining capital works already in place. 1983 OBJECTIVES - To provide for regular maintenance of the water control structures at a level comparable with 1982 - To carry out major maintenance at Palgrave Dam and in the Lower Humber Channel. FUNDING This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded by the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: Funding has been allocated in order to cover a progressive maintenance program, including non-recurring major maintenance OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utili ties Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 49,045 34,l50 154,805 238,000 n I 82 08 10 IV 01>0 (') I N VI Page V-l8 1983 BtJOOEI' ESTIMl\TES DIVISICN: Water Resource SH:TICN : Flood Centrol Program: Flood Centrol Maintenance/Sm3.l.l Dams, Channels, Eros~on Control Structures I I I I I I 1983 BlJr:GEI' , OCURCES OF FINTlN:Iro I 1982 BUr:GEI' I 1982 AC'IUAI..S I I ACI'DlITY I NEl' I PROVINCIAL MWICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I GRAm' IEVY I CII'HER I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I I $ $ I $ I $ ~ I $ I $ I $ $ I $ I I I I I I I I I I Sr.all Dams l4,000 I 14,000 I 7,700 6,300 I I l3,000 I I I I I I I I I I I IMajor Maintenance 162,000 I l62,ooO I 89,loo 72,900 I 60,000 I I I I I I I I I I I IErosion I I I I I I I I Chan."1eIs I 7,000 I 7,000 I 3,850 3,l50 I 7,000 I I I i I I I I I I I IFlood Central I I I I I I I I Clannels I 55,000 I I 55,000 I 30,250 24, 750 I 75, 000.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'TOTAL I 238,000 I I 238,000 I l30,9OQ I 107,100 I I 155,000 I I I I 82 08 lO Page ~ 1983 BUDGET ESTIMATES DIVISION: Water Resource SECTION Flood Control PROGRAM Flood Control River Forecasting Operations/Maintenance Water Control Structures PURPOSE To operate, maintain and improve the Authority's ability to provide the earliest possible warning of a flood threat and to operate its flood control structures. 1983 OBJECTIVES - To continue regular operation and maintenance of the Flood Control Works and the Flood Warning and Flood Forecasting System at a level comparable with 1982. - To upgrade the data collection and analysis techniques required for advanced flood warning FUNDING: This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded by the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL COMMENTS Funding has been allocated in order to cover a progressive maintenance program, including non-recurring major maintenance OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents TOTAL $ 57,l54 23,750 580 4l,633 123,117 (') I 82 08.io IV en (') I I\J -..I Page V-20 1983 BUOOEl' ESTIM1l.TES DIVISICN Water Resource SEJ:TICN Floc:rl Ca1tro1 Program: 'Floc:rl Control River Forecasting Operations/Maintenance Water Ca1tro1 Structures I I I I I 1983 BUOOEl' SJURCES CF FIN1>.NC:m:i I 1982 BUOOEl' I 1982 ACruALS I I ACI'IVITY I I NEI' PRO~IAL MUNICIPAL I I I I I I I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES GRANl' lEVY I CfIHER I EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES I EXPENDI'IURES I REVENUES I I $ I $ I $ $ $ I $ I $ $ I $ I $ I I I I I I I I I IClairevi11e Dam 39, (Xn I I 39,002 21,45l l7,55l I I 35,750 35,750 I I I I I I I I I I I IG.Ross Lord Dam 34,115 I I 34,115 18,763 l5,352 I I 30,550 30,550 I I I I I I I I I I I I Floc:rl warning 4l,000 I I 4l,000 22,550 l8,450 I I 40, 200 40,200 I I I I I I I I , I I I Floc:rl warning I I I I I i I I I System Fquiprnt I I I I I I I I I t-'.cde11ing 9,000 I I 9,000 4,950 I 4,050 I I l4, 500 l4,500 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IUI'AL I l23,117 I I l23,117 I 67,714 55,403 I l2l,00Q I l2l,00Q I I I 82 08 l0 C-2B SCHEDULE "B" EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN METROPOLITAN TORONTO 19B3 PROGRAMME AS PROPOSED IN PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN METROPOLITAN TORONTO 1982-l9B4 THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AUGUST, 19B2 C-29 - 1 - EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN METROPOLITAN TORONTO 19B3 PROGRAMME INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to outline the progress of the Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization Project for Metropolitan Toronto which is designed to carry out the following (a) Major erosion control and slope stabilization remedial works carried out on a priority basis, on watercourses draining generally in excess of l,300 hectares (b) Initiate a preventative programme in the form of minor remedial works and revegetation of embankment. Since site conditions change continually, the priorities have to be reviewed on a regular basis The current top priorities are reflected in the work programme for 1983 and the 'Pool of Priority Sites', which are found in the respective sections of this report C-30 - 2 - PROGRESS REPORT The following is a list at which major or minor remedial work was carried out between the inception of Project W C -60 - 'Erosion Control and Bank Stabilization in Metropolitan Toronto' in September, 1974, through the I Interim Water and Related Land Management Project 1977-1981' and including the first year of the 1982-l984 Erosion Project LOCATION WJ\TERSHED WORK YEAR MAJOR REMEDIAL WORKS 90 Forestgrove Drive East Don River 1974 20-30 Islay Court Humber River 1974 39-4l Storer Drive Humber Rivcr 1974-l975 99-l03 Burbank Drive Newtonbrook Creek 1974-1975 Hi Mount Drive Newtonbrook Creek 1974-l975 8-l0 King Maple Place Newtonbrook Creek 1974-1975 113 Burbank Drive Newtonbrook Creek 1975 14-22 Archway Crescent Humber River 1975 6 Wooden Heights Humber River 1975 45 Riverbank Drive and Vicinity Mimico Creek 1975 32-38 Bonnyview Drive Mimico Creek 1975-'1976 37-43 Lakeland Drive West Humber 1976 Yvonne Public School Black Creek 1976 30-56 Grovetree Road West Humber 1976 ~~-97 Portico Drive East Branch High1~nd 1976 Creek 1~7-205 Sweeney Drive East Don River 1976 24 Stonegate Road Humber River 1976-l977 24'-36 Westle igh Cresc(~nt Etobicoke Creek 1976-l977 15'-168 & lSp-2l2 Three Valleys East Don River 1976-l977 Dlive 6-14 Sulkara Court East Don River 1978 Don Valley Drive Don River 1978 50-58 Stanwood Crescent Humber River 1978-l979 Enfield/Sunset/Jellicoe Vicinity Etobicoke Creek 1979 17-53 Riverview Heights Humber River 1979 10 Codeco Court - Phase I Don River 1980 35 Canyon Avenue Don River 1979 3l-39 Rivercove Drive Mimico Creek 1980 25-31 Alamosa Drive Don River 1980 Don Valley Parkway & Lawrence Don River 1980 10-14 Bruce Farm Drive Don River 1980-l98l 39-47 Presley Avenue Don River 1980-1981 Grenview Boulevard Mimico Creek 1981 Rainbow Creekway Don River 1981 9 & 11 Su1kara Court Don River 1981 Denison Road Humber River 1981 146-168 Humbervale Boulevard and 835 Royal York Road Mimico Creek Proposed 1982 45 & 55 Wynford Heights Crescent Don River Proposed 1982 C-31 - 3 - LOCATION WATERSI-lEO WORK-YEAR -- MINOR REMEDIAL WORKS 520 Markham Road Vicinity Highland Creek 1975 (Cedarbrook Retirement Home) 84-89 Greenbrook Drive Black Creek 1975 Kirkbradden Road Mimico Creek 1975 West Hill Collegiate HighlD.nd Creek 1975 Shore ham Court Black Creek 1975 27-3l Ladysbridge Drive West Branch Highland 1975-l976 N W. of 56 Grovetree Road West Humber River 1975-l976 37-43 Mayall Avenue Black Creek 1976 79 Clearview Heights Black Creek 1976 S W of Shoreham Drive Bridge Black Creek 1976 Driftwood Court Black Creek 1976 75 Decarie Circle Mimico Creek 1976 4 Woodhaven Heights Humber River 1977 73 Van Dusen Boulevard Mimico Creek 1977 Donalda Club (8th Fwy) Don River 1978 Westleigh Crescent Vicinity Etobicoke Creek 1978 Scarlett Woods Golf Club Humber River 1978 22-26 Dunning Crescent Etobicoke Creek 1978 Kennedy Road Shopping Mall Don Ri ver 1978 Sheppard and Leslie Nursery Don Ri ver 1978 Leslie Street at Sheppard Don River 1978 Meadowvale Road Rouge Ri ver 1978 Zoo (Z-l5) - Phase I Rouge River 1978 Orchard Crescent Mimico Creek 1978 Forest Valley Day Camp Don River 1978 Beechgrove Drive Highland Creek 1979 Restwell Crescent Don River 1979 Deanewood Crescent Vicinity Mimico Creek 1979 Dawes Road - 2 Sites Don River 1979 Tywn Rivers Bridge Rouge River 1979 Glen Rouge Trailer Camp Rouge River 1979 Beechgrove Drive - II Highland Creek 1980 Jason and Riverdale Humber River 1980 Warden & St Clair - 2 Sites Don River 1980 Zoo - II Rouge River 1980 Glendon College Don Ri ver 1980 Scarlett Road & Eglinton Humber River 1980 Wilket Creek Don River 1980 Glen Rouge Trailer Camp Rouge River 1980 Sunnybrook Park Don River 1981 Donalda Golf Club Don Ri ver 1981 Glendon College Don River 1981 Donnyview Drive II Mimico Creek 1981 West Side of Markham Rd (West Branch) Highland Creek 1981 Alderbrook Drive Don River 1981 Adjacent to Edenbridge Yard Humber River Proposed 1982 West Dean Park (2 Sites) Mimico Creek 1982 Royal York Road Mimico Creek Proposed 1982 Waulron Street Etobicoke Creek Proposed 1982 Colonel Danforth Park Highland Creek Proposed 1982 Upwood Greenbelt Vicinity Black Creek Proposed 1982 These can be summarized as follows: Major Works - 36 Minor Works - 5l Total Expenditure - $4,700,000.00 C-32 - 4 - CURRENT PRIORITIES Due to the large number of sites requiring erosion control and bank stabilization work throughout Metropolitan Toronto, major remedial work is being undertaken on a priority basis The original priority ratings listed in the James F MacLaren report of March, 1970, are used as a starting point in assessing the rate of progress and deterioration during the twelve years that have elapsed Based on year-round monitoring, the severity of the problem in its present state and a fair idea of its relative potential to deteriorate, the staff has determined a pool of sites bearing high priority ratings. Since erosion is a dynamic problem, the priorities within this pool change continually as we strive to ameliorate the list with the steady influx of technical data on site conditions. Therefore the following list of "current priorities" will be reviewed regularly during 1983 in order to accommodate any significant changes and the possible inclusion of new sites Added to our current priority list, denoted by an asterick (*) , are sites which were considered for remedial work in previous years, but for various reasons have been deferred indefinately These sites are included for your info1IDation and will be reconsidered for remedial work upon the resolution of outstanding issues. C-33 - 5 - 1983 WORK PROGRAMME The following table shows the proposed work progran~e for 1983 with the accompanying budget analysis ITEM ESTIMATED COST Design Delroy Drive and Berl Avenue $l2,000 00 Priority Review lO,OOO.OO Environmental Inventories 4,500 00 Survey and Legal 16,500 00 Major Remedial I Wynford Hts Cres (Phase II) 45,000 00 Revegetation I l5,000 00 Major Remedial II Beaucourt Road 110,000 00 Minor Remedial I North York General Hospital Flerningdon Golf Course Downsview Dell Weston Golf Club 40,000.00 Major Remedial III Delroy and Berl 111,500 00 Minor Remedial II 26 Restwell Crescent 20,000 00 Don Valley Golf Club Revegetation II l2,000.00 $396,500.00 NOTE These costs include expected revenue POOL OF EROSION ' PRIORITY SITES 1983- METRO TORONTO LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS PRIORITY lOO-l04 Gwendolen West Don River North York 1 .,. Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Crescent Structures Affected Three residences Height of Bank: 70m Length of Bank: 75m 99-l13 Weir Cres. Highland Creek Scarborough 2 .,. Problem Slope failure Structures Affected Nice residences and three pools Height of Bank: 100m Length of Bank: 150m 12-32 Beaucourt Roa :l Mimico Creek Etobicoke 3 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Structures Affected: Two residences, II properties Height of Bank 20m Length of Bank lOOm 12-42 Delroy Drive Mirnico Creek Etobicoke 4 Problem Slope failure and riverbank erosion I 47-5l Berl Avenue Structures Affected Five residences 0\ Height of Bank: 12m J Length of Bank: 100m Sewell Road at Rouge River Scarborough 5 Problem Slope failure and riverbank erosion Finch Avenue Structures Affected roadway Height of Bank 18m Length of Bank 70m 161 Riverside Drive Humber River Toronto 6 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Structures Affected roadway Height of Bank 9m Length of Bank 33m Raymore Drive, Humber River Etobicoke 7 Problem Slope failure and riverbank erosion (shale bank} Riverstone Drive Structures Affected Raymore Drive and l4 properties Vista Humber Dr Height of Bank 12m Length of Bank 250m 14 Forest Path Humber River Etobicoke 8 Problem Slope failure and riverbank erosion Court Structures Affected One residence, One pool Height of Bank 10m Length of Bank 23m I (') I W ~ POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY SITES () 1983~ METRO TORONTO Page 2 1 IN U1 LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS PRIORITY 9l Forest Grove Dr East Don River North York 9 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Structures Affected One residence Height of Bank 22m Length of Bank 40m 48-50 Barkwin Drive Humber River Etobicoke 10 Problem Slope failure (fill material) Structures Affected Two residences, Two pools Height of Bank 25m Length of Bank 30m Rowntree Mills Park Humber River North York 11 Problem: Major riverbank erosion (adjacent to Structure s Affected: Park pathway and parking lot Aviemore Drive) Height of Bank: lOrn Length of Bank 115m 3l-35 Lakeland Driv West Humber Etobicoke 12 * Problem Slope failure River Structures Affected Three residences Height of Bank 6m I Length of Bank 20m -..I 1025 Scarlett Road Humber River Etobicoke 13 * Problem Riverbank erosion (shale bank) I Structures Affected: One low-rise apartment, garage Height of Bank 15m Length of Bank: 35m 14 Neilson Drive Etobicoke Ck Etobicoke 14 Problem Slope failure and riverbank erosion North of Dundas Structures Affected One high-rise apartment, one pool Street West Height of Bank 17m Length of Bank 20m 19 Fairglen Cres. Humber River North York & 15 Problem Slope failure and riverbank erosion (shale bank) & Vicinity Bor. of York Structures Affected One residence and one high-rise apartment Height of Bank 7m Length of Bank 100m Below Eccleston Dr East Don Rive North York 16 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion beside the railway Structures Affected: Hydrolines, Train tracks tracks Height of Bank 17m Length of Bank 70m POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY SITES 1983-METRO TORONTO Page 3 LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS PRIORITY 35-39 Troutbrooke Black Creek North York 17 Problem: Slope failure (fill material) Drive Strnct.l.u:es Affected Two residences Height of Bank: 28m Length of Bank 20)1\ 92-94 Celeste Drive West Highland Scarborough 18 * Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Creek Structures Affected Two residences, One pool Height !''If Bank 35m kngth of Bank: 32m 69-71 Pegasus Trail East Highland Scarborough 19 Problem: Slope failure Creek Structures Affected: Two residences, Two pools Height of Bank 5m Length of R<lnk 5m 3967 Lawrence AvenuE West Highland Scarborough 20 Problem: Slope failure East Structures Affected: Apartment pool I Height of Bank: 32m co Length of Bank: 18m . I (') I I W 0\ C-37 Sf:IIEDULE "C" EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN TilE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL 1983 PROGRAMME AS PROPOSED IN PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL 1982-1984 THE t1.ETROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AUGUST, 1982 C-38 EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN TIlE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL 1983 PROGRAMt1E INTRODUCTION Following the erosion inventory and priority study that was carried out for the Regional Municipality of Peel, a list of significant erosion sites was prepared, from which staff formulates the annual work programmes. Since site conditions change continually, the priorities have to be reviewed on a regular basis. The current top priorities are reflected in the work programme for 1983 and the 'Pool of Erosion Priority Sites' which are found in the respective sections of this report. It should be noted that i~ the Region of Peel, the municipal share of the costs of erosion control programme are passed on to the local municipalities. As a result, the erosion priority pool is divided to coincide with the three local municipalities within the Region of Peel, namely the Town of Caledon, the City of Brampton and the City of Mississauga and consequently, the relative priorities are not given on a regional basis. 1983 is the second year of the 1982-1984 Project for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Regional Municipality of Peel. This project has budgeted $30,000.00 for the 1983 programme. C-39 PROGRESS REPORT The following is a list of sites at which remedial work was carried out between January, 1979; the inception of The Interim Water and Related Land Management Project, and the first year of the 1982-1904 Erosion Project. LOCATION WATERSHED WORK YEAR 138 King Street Vicinity - Bolton Humber River 1979 (Town of Caledon) Sherway Drive, Mississauga Etobicoke Creek 1979 Wildwood Park, Mississauga Mimico Creek 1979 Mill Street, Brampton Etobicoke Creek 1980 Pony trail Drive & Steepbank Cres., Etobicoke Creek 1980-1981 (Vicinity, Mississauga) 10 Beamish, t'lildfield, (Brampton) West Humber River 1980 (Lindsay Creek) Centennial Road - Bolton Humber River 1981 (Caledon) Legion Street near Derry Road Mimico Creek 1982 (Mississauga) Charo]ais Blvd. , (Brampton) Etobicoke Creek 1982 CURRENT PRIORITIES: Given the number of sites requiring erosion control and slope stabilization work throughout the Region of Peel, major remedial work is being undertaken on a priority basis. The original priority ratings listed in the Erosion Inventory and Priorities Study of 1977, are used as a starting point in assessing the rate of progress and deterioration of erosion sites during ~ the years that have elapsed. \ \ \ .\ \ i i \ \ Based on year-round monitoring, the severity of the problem in its present state and a fair idea of its relative potential to deteriorate, the staff has determined a pool of sites bearing high priority ratings Because erosion is a dynamic problem, the priorities within this pool change continually as we strive to ameliorate the list with the steady influx of technical data on site conditions. Therefore, the following list of "current priorities" will be reviewed regularly during 1983 in order to accommodate any significant changes and the possible inclusion of new sites. C-40 1983 WORK PROGRA}lliffi The following table shows the proposed programme for 1983 together with the accompanying budget analysis: ITEM ESTIMl\TED COST Survey and Legal ~ 4,000.00 Major Remedial I Albert Street, Caledon 21,300.00 Major Remedial II Scott Street, Brampton 10,300.00 $35,600.00 NOTE These costs include expected revenue n POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY SITES I A 1983 - PEEL (Mississauga) ..... LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICiPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS PRIORITY 130 Dundas St. West Etobicoke Mississauga 1 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Creek Structure Affected Factory parking lots Height of Bank: 9m Length of Bank 70m 469 Netherhart Road Etobicoke Mississauga 2 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Creel<" Structure Affected Storage area behind industrial building Height of Bank 12m Length of Bank: 40m - --- - --..;-= __------~~-r POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY SITES 1983 - PEEL (Brampton) Page 2 LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS PRiORITY 3 Scott Street Etobicoke Brampton 1 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Creek Structure Affected Private property Height of Bank: 4.8m Length of Bank: 3 SIT! H-142, Beamish Court West Humber Brampton 2 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion ildfield River Structure Affected: Private property Height of Bank: 8m Length of Bank: 15m , I (') I I ~ t\J (") POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY SITES I 1983 - PEEL (Ca1edon) ~ Page 3 w LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS PRIORITY 39-161 Albert Street Humber River Caledon 1 Problem: Riverbank erosion Jlton Structures Affected Eight residences Height of Bank: 2.9m Length of Bank: 100m , , I I C-44 SCHEDULE "D" EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK 1983 PROGRAMME AS PROPOSED IN PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK 1982-1984 THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AUGUST, 1983 C-45 EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK 1983 PROGRA}~E INTRODUCTION: Following the Erosion Inventory and Priority Study that was carried out for the Regional Municipality of York, a list of significant erosion sites was prepared, from which staff formulates the annual work programmes. , Since site conditions change continually, the priorities have to be reviewed on a regular basis. The current top priorities are reflected in the work programme for 1983 and the 'Pool of Erosion Priority Sites' which are found in the respective sections of this report. 1983 is the second year of the 1982-1984 Project for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Regional Municipality of York. This project has budgeted $20,000.00 for the Region of York for 1983. L-tjb PROGRESS REPORT The following is a list of sites at which remedial work was carried out between January, 1979; the inception of The Interim Water and Related Land Management Project, and the first year of the 1982-1984 Erosion Project. LOCATION WATERSIIED WORK YEAR 7374 Kipling Avenue, Woodbridge Humber River 1979 (Rainbow Creek) 7440 Kipling Avenue, Woodbridge Humber River 1979 (Rainbow Creek) 8240 Pine Valley Drive, Woodbridge Humber River 1979-l980 14th Avenue, Markham Rouge River 1979-l980 19th Avenue, Markham Rouge River 1979 King Township and Town of Caledon Line Humber River 1979 (Cold Creek) Cedar Grove Community Centre Rouge River 1980 146 Riverside Drive, Woodbridge Humber River 1980 Postwood Lane, Markham Don River 1980 Pine Grove Vicinity Humber River 1980 Northtown Sewage Treatment Plant Don River 1981 Kennedy Road West, Markham JDbn River 1981 Nobleton, Lot 5, Con. 8 Humber River 1982 (Cole Farm) 5760 Kirby Sideroad, Phase I Humber River Proposed 1982-83 CURRENT PRIORITIES: Given the number of sites requiring erosion control and slope stabilization work throughout the Region of York, major remedial work is being undertaken on a priority basis. The original priority ratings listed in the Erosion Inventory and Priorities Study of 1977 is used as a starting point in assessing the rate of progress and deterioration of erosion sites during the years that have elapsed. Based on a year-round monitoring, the severity of the problem in its present state and a fair idea of its relative potential to deteriorate, the staff has determined a pool of sites bearing high priority ratings. Because erosion is a dynamic problem, the priorities within this pool change continually as we strive to ameliorate the list with the steady influx of technical data on site conditions. Therefore, the following list of "current priorities" will be C-47 and the possible inclusion of new sites. 1983 WORK PROGRAMME The following table shows the proposed work programme for 1983 together with the accompanying budget analysis ITEM ESTIMATED COST Survey and Legal $ 2,000.00 Major Remedial I 5760 Kirby Sideroad 8,000.00 Major Remedial II R.R. #3, Woodbridge 13,500.00 ~23,500.00 NOTE These costs include expected revenue. POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY SITES 1983 - YORK LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS FRIORITY R R. #3, Woodbridge Humber River Vaughan 1 Problem: Riverbank erosion Structure Affected: One pool and one tennis court Height of Bank: 4.8m , Length of 'Bank 35m ,varden Avenue at Rouge River Markham 2 Problem: Riverbank erosion and slope failure 1ajor Mackenzie Drive StrurtuL~ Affected: One residence Height of Bank: 5m Length of Bank: 30m 33 Village Squire Don River Markham 3 Probler.. Valley wall slope failure Structure Affected: One residence Height of Bank: 11. 7m Length of Bank 28m raM Golf Course Rouge River Markham 4 Problem: Riverbank erosion and slope failure Structure Affected One tee-off area Height of Bank 27m Length of Bank 95m .(10151) Highway g27 Humber River Vaughan 5 Problem Riverbank erosion ind King/Vaughan Road Structure Affected One fence Height of Bank: 4rn Length of Bank 30m (') I I ol:> (X) C-49 SCHEDULE "E" LRO~;rON CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN TIlE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM 1983 PROGRAHME AS PROPOSED IN PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM 1982 - 1984 - - THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSBRVATION AUTHORITY AUGUST, 1982 , C-50 --~. EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM 1983 PROGRAMME INTRODUCTION Following the erosion inventory and priority study that was carried out for the Regional Municipality of Durham, a list of significant erosion sites was prepared, from which staff formulates the annual work programmes. Since site conditions change continually, the priorities have to be reviewed on a regular basis. The current top priorities are reflected in the work programme for 1983 and the 'Pool of Erosion Priority Sites' which are found in the respective sections of this report. 1983 is the second year of the 1982-1984 Project for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Regional Municipality of Durham. This project has budgeted $5,000 00 for 1983 in the Region of Durham. C-5l PROGRESS REPORT The following is a list of sites at which remedial work was carried out between January, 1979; the inception of The Interim Water and Related Land Management Project and the eirst year of the 1982-l98~ Erosion Project. LOCATION WATERSHED '\fORK YEAR 16 Elizabeth Street, Ajax Duffin Creek 1979 558 Pine Ridge Road, Pickering Rouge River 1979 Hockey Ranch, Pickering Duffin Creek 1980 Woodgrange Avenue, Pickering Rouge River 1981 Altona Road, Pickering Petticoat Creek 1981 Sideroad 30 ( Whitevale ) Duffin Creek Proposed 1982 CURRENT PRIORITIES Given the number of sites requiring erosion control and slope stabilization work throughout the Region of Durham, major remedial work is being under- taken on a priority basis. The original priority ratings listed in the Erosion Inventory and Priorities Study of 1977 is used as a starting point in assessing the rate of progress and deterioration of erosion sites during the years that have elapsed. Based on year-round monitoring, the severity of the problem in its present state and a fair idea of its relative potential to deteriorate, the staff has determined a pool of sites bearing high priority ratings. Because I ~ \ \ erosion is a dynamic/problem, the priorities wit in this pool Change\ I . I , 1 continually as we strive to ameliorate the list with the st ady influx , ; \ \ of technical data qn site conditions. Therefore, \~he following list ~f "current priorities" will be reviewed regularly du~ing 1983 in order to accomodate any significant changes and the possible inclusion of new sites. C-52 1983 \-,YOHK PROGP-^mm The fol.lowing table shows the proposcu work progranunc for 1983 and the accompanying budget analysis ITEH ESTIHATI~D COST Survey and J.eC)al $ 300 00 Remedial I Green River Pork 4,700.00 $5,000.00 . 0- I r n POOL OF FPO~ION PRiORITY SITES I V1 -' \ ,,' 1983 - DUFJiAJ.'1 IN LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHN:CAL COMMENTS FRIORITY G=een River Park,D-16 West Duffin Pickering 1 Problem Riverbank erosion Creek Structures Affected One outdoor dining pavillion Height of Bank 6.5m Length of Bank 90m ~ I I 1840 A1tona Road,D-1S Petticoat Pickering 2 Problem Riverbank erosion Creek Structures Affected One residence and one pool Height of Bank 1. 1m Length of Bank: 20m Brock Road at Finch Duffin Creek Pickering 3 Problem Riverboank erosion Avenue Structures Affected One shed Height of Bank: 1.5m Length of Bank 20m 1436 Highbush Trail Petticoat Pickering 4 Problem Riverbank erosion Creek Structures Affected One garage Height of Bank 5.5m Length of Bank: 20m ... . . - - _ _ _"_U___ -- -0 -- -.--- C-"54 SCHEDULE "F" THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY ADDENDUM TO THE PROJECT FOR CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS - MAIN HUMBER RIVER VILLAGE OF BOLTON, TOWN OF CALEDON SEPTEMBER 1982 C-55 CONTENTS OF BRIEF PURPOSE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION PROPERTY ACQUISITION COSTS AND FINANCING APPROVALS C-56 ~ -1- PURPOSE The purpose of this addendum is to provide additional funding for the proposed flood control remedial works as outlined in the approved Lrief on Channel Improvements - Main Humber River, Village of Bolton, Town of Caledon, dated May 1981. C-57 - 2 - LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The work proposed in connection with this project involves the Main Humber River in the village of Bolton as shown on Figure 1 The majority of the existing development in the Village is situated on the floodplain of the river at the bottom of a deep well-defined valley In many areas including the downtown business section, existing grade is only about 2 metres above the normal water level of the river In the recent updating of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Watershed Plan, Bolton was identified as a damage centre This indicates that it is a flood susceptible area in which potential damages and community disruption are significant Based upon a ranking of factors such as expected damage, threa t to li fe, disruption. of transportation routes, etc , the Bolton Damage Centre was identified as an area of high priority for the implementation of flood protection works. The various components proposed in this project are detailed on Figure 2 and consist of a major channel diversion to bypass the oxbow, the construction of a new bridge over the diversion, the reconstruction of an existing King Street bridge and the berrning of three low lying areas situated upstream of the diversion. Some channel improvements are also required below the diversion to the reconstructed bridge These proposed works not only provide a high degree of flood protection to the Village of Bolton, but also maintains the existing Old Mill Dam and by restricting the King Street Bridge just below the diversion, a base flow will be maintained through the existing oxbow. This will ensure the retention of a riverside environment for the residential development which abuts the existing stream bank. Due to the time delay between carrying out the preliminary engineering design cost estimates and the completion of the detailed design to the point of calling tenders, the estimated cost of the project has increased primarily as a result of inflation. Also, some minor changes were required in the original proposal as a result of detailed design. These included some additional berming upstream of the Old Mill Dam (see Figure 2) , modifications to the flow restrictor at the upstream King Street Bridge and some additional costs for the relocation of municipal services. It is therefore necessary to request additional funding through this addendum to enable the completion of the proposed works The estimated additional funding has been included in the Authority's 1983 budget / C-58 - 3 - PROPERTY ACQUISITION The acquisition of property required for this project will be undertaken under the Land Acquisition Project 1982 - 1984 of the Watershed Plan and therefore, will not form part of this project C-59 - 4 - COSTS AND FINANCING The expenditures required to implement this project shall be understood to include engineering and geotechnical studies, site supervision, environmental assessment and all materials, labour, equi pmen t, etc associated with the construction COSTS Original Estimate Berms $ 44,000 00 Diversion Channel $ 96,000 00 Bridge Restriction $ lO,OOO 00 Bridge Construction $ 300,000 00 Bridge Enlargement $ 320,000 00 Channelization $ 207,000 00 Environmental Assessment $ 25,000 00 Engineering $ 160,000 00 Contingencies (10%) $ 116,000 00 TOTAL ~hn~~~QJ~=~~ Increased Costs Inflation $ 105,000 00 Relocation of Services $ 49,500 00 Berm Modifications and extensions $ l26,500 00 Bridge Construction $ 116,000 00 TOTAL ~==~21~~~~=~~ Revised Project Total - $l,278,000.00 + $397,000 = $l,675,000.00. FINANCING The total cost of the addendum to the project is $397,000 00 as detailed above and would be funded by the Province as follows \ provincial Cashflow $290,100.00 Province share of Revenues $l06,900 pO TOTAL ~~2Z~~Q~=~~ C-60 ~ -0 HWY. 9 0 0 v >- 3: :r HWY 7 \ METROPOLITAN ,,; TORONTO LIMIT ,'" HWY. 401 HW'( 5 HWY.2 ~~ O~he metropolitan toronto and region n I 0\ .... 0 0 ri / D D [] SHEET PILING 0 BERMS BRIDGE BRIDGE RESTRICTION RECONSTRUCTION KING 5T, 00 OD 0 ci > ...J l-ff ,0 CD 190v. <t ~-ff~ w ...J ~7' .s- a:: w - CD DIVERSION ::E ::> :J: ~ ~the metropolitan toronto and region FIG. 2 conservation authority C-62 SCIIEDULE "G" THE NETROPOLITAN TORONTO ArJD REGION CONSEHVl\'fION AUTHORITY ~A PROJECT FOR CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ON THE EAST BRANCH OF HIGHLAND CREEK" 1983 SEPTEMBER 21, 1982 C-63 CONTEN'l'S I PURPOSE OF PHOJECT II LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION III COSTS AND FINANCING IV AUTHORITY APprOVALS AND REQUESTS V LAND VALUES VI AGREEMENTS -- - --._--- - - -- -- , C-64 I PURPOSE OF PROJECT The purpose of this project is to enable 'I'he Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to continue to carry out channel improvements on the East Branch of the Highland Creek The channel improvements proposed will offer protection to those areas which require attention at this time Although it is anticipated that some control on reducing the high flows and velocities through the East Branch will be part of the recommend~tions of an engineering study presently underway, site specific works are required at this time to ensure protection to development at the top of the valley wall and to municipal services in the valley. A great deal of the erosion on the East Branch occurred during two major floods in late August, 1976. Since this branch had never had any erosion protection works, the damage that ensued was very extensive However the highly urbanized character of most of the watershed has also contributed greatly to the erosion problems The increase in peak flows, higher velocities and more frequent flooding combined with the eroded condition of the valley and the very erosion susceptible soils inherent to the nighland Creek demands that protective steps be taken. Otherwise, the natural valley character will be totally destroyed resulting in a hazardous situation to existing aevelopment along the valley rim and the municipal services in the valley. The estimated cost of this project is $150,000.00 C-65 II LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The remedial works proposed in this project are located on the East Branch, Sitc No 2 and 3 on Figure 1 Coincident riverbank croGion, combined with cxcessive ground water seepage and the sandy/silty soils found at both these sites has resulted in very largc, vcry active scars and sediment generating sources If left unattended, the erosion scars will soon encroach into adjacent urbilll areas and the loss of valuable open space and mature vegetation will continue unabated The specific remedial works proposed will eliminate or at. least minimize the effects of the erosion and will basically consist of (i) minor channel relocation (H) rip rap armouring to protect the toe of the valley wall (Hi) and the introduction of plant material and drains to aid in the rehabilitation of the slope Site locations and scope of these works are illustrated on Figure 2 and Figure 3 while a typical channel section is found on Figure 4. --. - -- '-- -.- "----- ------ ---~-- --. - ---- - ------ .~--- ---- --- - -- --- - --- - . . . ,. .,.: .' ....... ;". .' , .. . .f.: ". ;..'k" 1i;.t. " . i'~ .~,.:< ,. . "i"<'~ ,. f t ~., .. -.",. .~- ~, . ~,r~~~~~;".,,;r'i:.J ~. ~, .,..' . ~:t.~...." . :=1r".~' ~~. ~,'!iP' ,.~ .", .. -,. ~~;~. .~ . .,:>, . t~.;..~;'1jg . .... " . "",' ~...".~ , "- ...*.~.' Ow. .;;:;~""'i . ,:;':'.'.;.;:. ';: ~ ~'t.:: :."';. i 'f{.'-' ...., .... ~ .' ~..~, _-I~~k':'i1.~"~~':./ . r . . .. -~ ~ : ~.~. >. ,'. .,.:~. "" . .......:.. .~~....... . . .~ .or' " .t'1" ',' .,.:";,:., '. ;. ~. .;?:,~: .::.::' '~~.; _.:-. -';::'7 . " .~ -.,,~....:\,..~ . ., ",.. .'....., ..'-+;..... .........,. . r; :., ...J':..... . '.;' . "~.'" ' .....:.:......,:;'..:..!'\.~~ 11:.~~;~V <,' ; .,," . ,-.<,.,<, ,. ., . ",,;" : .. l- ,. ...f'....., ."-,..,.~~._- . .~ ... ....;..". '.', ..~-::t ............... ." ...":"~X"T. ~.. .".f._ ..... ...t"...~ ... . fo. ~ ;.... ... f .. ~ . .... . '". ',:.....~..,. . . . .. .., . . . . - . .' .~" . .. ", , ... .. , ': i ". .. ~ , ~ . .'" ~.. ...... t .... .:-., I --:':":lj. .::........ 1/ ',., --. , ... ,. .. f . . ': ., \ ...... . . ;f(~ -;# , ." . -. '...~;o .' .,." _..~ .... .- . .' .... _' .' :_' . { '. . '\ ....., \ " 7 .' ".~rF'I.".~...~_.. lh.. ~, ,~'-.,;,. ,. , ~ ,. .....-4$ .' ... . ...t. 0\ . .~- ". .' .~J;:.:", '. - ," '. -.. ;~'::' ---~~:.," . ~ .,.... i ~- ~ ..; ~ C-67 ONE OF SEVEN (7) MAJOR COINCIDENT VALLEY WALL EROSION PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED ON THE EAST BRANCH / / j ,j j I! .j J ,~ ; 'I " ? , j 1 J/ ./ .i , ) .] , I ,I . ! I i C-68 FIG 2 I SCALE I = 2000 _. RIP RAP ARMOURING C-69 x x . . ~ ,,,\ ~ FIG 3 I SCALE I = 2000 _ RIP RAP ARMOURING TYPICAL CHANNEL SECTION EXISTING PROFILE j250mm-600mm RIP RAP 'r;; T / YGRADE 11> 3H IV AND SOD CLEAN OUT 270R TERRAFIX FILTER FIG 4- (') I -..J Q c-71 III COSTS AND FINANCING The expenditures required to implement this project are based on the best information currently available for works to be undertaken The costs stated shall be understood to include legal and survey fees, engineering and geotechnical studies, site supervision and all materials, labour, equipment, etc associated with the construction COSTS The estimated cost breakdown for remedial works at the two sites identified are as follows ITEM SITE II SITE III Mobilization, access preparation $8,000 00 $9,000 00 and maintenance Placement of Granular A 7,000 00 10,000 00 Installation of rip rap armouring 35,000 00 39,000 00 and filter Provision for French Drains 8,000 00 6,000 00 Revegetation 4,000 00 4,500 00 Restoration 3,000 00 3,000 00 Contingencies 6,000 00 7,500 00 SUB-TOTALS $71,000 00 $79,000 00 TOTAL - $l50,000 00 FINANCING ] Total Cost of the Project $150,000.00 Authority Share $67,500 00 Province of Ontario Share $82,500 00 The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto is designated as the benefiting municipality to raise the Authority's share of the work c-n IV AUTHORITY APPROV^LS AND REQUESTS Authority Motion Letter to Metro Metro's approval Letter to Minister - -_.- -. -- -- - . C-73 V l,ANO USE No land acquisition is required in order to carry out the works proposed under this Project VI AGREEMENTS As this Project does not involve new land acquisition, no agreements ~ill be required I Where Authority land is involved, those parts not required for water control works are managed, under agreement, by The Metropolitan Toronto Parks Department.