HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Use Advisory Board 2000
~
, THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #1/00
February 11, 2000 Page E1
The Public Use Advisory Board Meeting #1/00, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office, on
Friday, February 11, 2000 The Chair, Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 11 06 a.m
PRESENT
John Adams Member
Marla Augimeri Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Dick O'Brien Chair, Authority
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
Linda Pabst Member
Frank Scarpitti Member
REGRETS
Doug Dickerson Vice Chair
Donna Patterson Chair
RES.#E1/00 - MINUTES
Moved ,by' Linda Pabst
Seconded by. Michael Di B;ase
-
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #6/99, held on November 5,1999, be approved. CARRIED
PRESENTATIONS
(a) A presentation by Chad Horenfeldt, Program Director, Children's Water Institute and Susan
O'Leary, Coordinator, York Children's Water Festival on the York Festival
(b) A presentation by John Swick, Superintendent, East Zone, on the 2000 Sugarbush Maple
Syrup Festival
(c) A presentation by Allan Foster, Acting Supervisor, Kortright Centre for Conservation, on
Kortright, Year in Review
E2 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #1/00 February 11 , 2000
RES.#E2/00 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by' Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Seconded by' Frank Scarpitti
THAT above-noted presentations (a) - (c) be heard and received . CARRIED
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#E3/00 - TOMMY THOMPSON PARK
Important Bird Area Designation Tommy Thompson Park/Leslie Street Spit
has been designated as an Important Bird Area (IBA) of Canada.
Moved by' Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Seconded by' Linda Pabst
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Authority support and endorse
the designation of Tommy Thompson Park/Leslie Street Spit as an Important Bird Area of
Canada,
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to continue to participate in the steering committee and
assist in the development of a conservation plan that is in keeping with the approved Master
Plan for Tommy Thompson Park CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Importatlt Bird Areas (ISA) program is an international effort to identify, conserve and monitor
a network of sites that provide essential habitat for bird populations across the globe The program
was started by Birdlife International in 1985, and since that time partners in over 120 countries have
joined together to build the globallBA network.
Canada's Birdlife partners - the Canadian Nature Federation, and Bird Studies Canada - launched
the nationallBA program in 1996, and t9day approximately 1,200 IBA's across the country have
been identified. The Federation of Ontario Naturalists is leading the conservation of IBA's in Ontario
by assisting local stakeholders with the development of community conservation plans for selected
IBA's.
The criteria for identifying IBA's are organized into four general categories:
1 Threatened Species - sites that hold significant numbers of endangered, threatened, or ',....
vulnerable bird species. ~
2 Birds with Restricted Breeding Ranges - sites that hold endemic species or those with
restricted ranges (of 50,000 km2 or less)
3 Biome Restricted Assemblages - sites that hold an assemblage of species restricted to a
biome (such as the Tundra or Great Plains biomes) or a unique natural community type
February 11, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #1/00 E3
4 Bird Concentrations - sites where birds concentrate in significant numbers when breeding,
wintering, or migrating
Tommy Thompson Park was nominated and subsequently designated under the IBA program since
it was determined to be significant in terms of Bird Concentrations (criteria #4) specifically for
nesting ring-billed gulls and black-crowned Night-Herons, and historically for nesting common terns
The average nesting ring-billed gull population at the park (55,000 pairs) represents approximately
6.2% of the world's estimated breeding population of this species, and as much as 9% of Canada's
breeding population Nationally significant numbers of Black-crowned Night Herons are also
present with approximately 18% (918 pairs) of the estimated Canadian breeding population being
recorded in 1989 (the 1999 population was 1001 pairs)
In addition to colonial waterbirds, Tommy Thompson Park is known for its large concentrations of
migrating songbirds, shorebirds and waterfowl It has also known to hold concentrations of
wintering owls.
To date approximately 80 of the IBA's designated in Canada are found in Ontario Other Ontario
IBA's that are receiving conservation planning include the St. Clair Marshes, Presqu' ile Provincial
Park, the James Say Coastal Region and Wye Marsh
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Staff have met with the program's Community Conservation Planner to discuss the process, and
an initial meeting was held on January 11th with representatives from the various stakeholders
associated with the park. From this initial meeting an ISA steering committee was established The
purpose of the steering committee will be to assist in the development of an IBA conservation plan
in conjunction with the program's Community Conservation Planner
In order to further assist with the !!eve!opment of the conservation plan, the Fedeiation of Ontario
Naturalists and the Nature Conservancy are sponsoring a planning workshop to which one member
of each IBA Steering Committee is invited to attend In the case of the TTP - ISA, one of the
Authority staff representative was nominated to attend this workshop to be held in Windsor in late
March
An official dedication ceremony is usually part of the IBA process and in this case will be planned
in the future
FUTURE BENEFIT
The IBA designation further reflects the importance of Tommy Thompson Park as a significant
habitat feature on the Toronto Waterfront, specifically with respect to its function as breeding habitat
for colonial waterbirds, and.as-a migratory stopover, staging and wintering area for a variety of other
bird species. Designation and incorporation into the ISA program highlights this area along side
other unique nationally and internationally known bird areas such as Point Pelee
Once designated, Tommy Thompson Park/Leslie Street Spit becomes part of a world wide network
of ISA sites and will be included in a proposed world directory of IBA's and other publication formats
including a web site (www ibacanada.com) Another proposed publication is a Great Lakes Bird
Trail Guide
E4 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #1/00 February 11, 2000
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The IBA program has a community action fund that has been established to provide funding support
for high-priority projects which contribute to the conservation of bird species and their habitats within
an ISA. Under this program, up to $5,000 annually (1 1 matched funding/in-kind) may be granted
to projects related to conservation, education or research Due to the funding request submission
deadline (February 15th), it was suggested by the steering committee that an application be
submitted to solicit funding for educational material related to the TIP - IBA designation and to host
a "Bird Festival" at the park in the late Spring of 2000
In-kind support to match possible funding through the community action fund could be made
available under the 2000 Tommy Thompson Park Operating Program
For information contact: Scott Jarvie, extension 5312
Date January 31, 2000
RES.#E4/00 - FILMING ON TRCA MANAGED OR OWNED LANDS
Protocols and permitting relating to film crews using TRCA managed or
owned lands.
Moved by' Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Seconded by' Frank Scarpitti
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT member municipalities be advised
of the TRCA commercial filming protocols,
AND FURTHER THAT member municipalities be requested to notify TRCA of proposed film
shoots on or adjacent to TRCA lands in advance of issuing a permit allowing the activity
AMENDMENT
RES.#E5/00
Moved by' Frank Scarpitti
Seconded by' Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT the following be inserted after the last paragraph of the main motion
AND FURTHER-THAT'staff arrange for a-meeting with staff from all Regions responsible for
film permitting within TRCA's jurisdiction to discuss a coordinated approach
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
February 11 , 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #1/00 E5
BACKGROUND
A resolution was passed by the Authority directing staff to develop a protocol for notification and
approval of film shoots within TRCA jurisdiction Recently, a film shoot for the "X-Men" movie
caused the closure of Twyn Rivers Drive in Scarborough The impact on local residents and
commuters drew attention to the proceedings on site resulting in calls from concerned citizens
being received by the Rouge Park, as well as Municipal and Regional Councillors Since parklands
being utilized for this scene are managed by Toronto Parks staff, and not directly by TRCA staff, little
information was received by Rouge Park and TRCA staff
RATIONALE
By informing our member municipalities about TRCA protocols for filming, we hope to set an
example as well as provide guidelines for notifying us of filming on our lands. Filming is an
important business in the GTA. It create jobs and brings money into the Toronto area economy
It also provides a revenue stream to the Authority Over the last three years, we have averaged
$50,000 in annual revenue from filming in the Conservation Areas alone Filming most often
happens in the Conservation Areas' slower seasons, and has very little impact on our visitors The
TRCA's experience with film production companies to date, has been quite favourable they strive
to leave the site in better condition than they found it; they always clean up litter; they follow up with
us to ensure we are content with the site restoration and they pay their bills promptly
Attached is a copy of the Commercial Photography Prep Sheet utilized by TRCA staff when dealing
with film requests
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Staff will contact member municipalities and convey the need to communicate with one another
about film projects happening on TRCA lands Copies of the TRCA Prep Sheet will be supplied
For information contact: Gord Weeden, 905-713-7374 or Susan O'Neil, extension 5298
n..to February 2, 2000
.........-
Attachments (1)
E6 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #1/00 February 11 , 2000
Attachment 1
Toronto and Region Conservation Commercial Photogra h Sheet
Project Date
Parent Company Previous contact? 0 Y o N
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Phone Phone 2 Phone 3 Fax
Identify subject property/building o Map/drawing attached
Do we own the site? oY o N I Who manages the site? I Under Lease Agreement? 0 Y oN
Requested date(s) times(s) for use?
--
Is the site available as requested above? oYoN
Are there staff available to supervise the activity? oYoN
Is the site in/near the floodplain/a regulated area? oY 0 N
Is the site in/near an ESA? oYoN
Is access to the watercourse required? o YoN Specify" -
Is DFO notification required? oYoN
Will the activity impact our neighbours? oYoN, Is notification required? 0 YoN
o municipality o police 0 fire o neighbours 0 tenants o other
o done o done o done o done o done o done
Are there any other limits or concerns regarding the use of this site? 0 YON
Applicant to provide 0 letter of intent o technical documentation 0 references 0 MSDS o site plan
o received o received o received o received o received
Activity (mark all that apply)
o still photography o live action o stunts 0 special effects/pyrotechnics o firearms o sp equipment.
Proof of Insurance o received o not required I Damage deposit: $ o received o returned
Specify estimated size of crew, number/types of equipment, props/sets to be used
Site inspection PRIOR"to use o.y 0 N " .. - I'-Site inspection-AFTER use oY 0 N
Identify any additional requirements
Fee specified
February 11, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #1/00 E7
SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
RES.#E6/00 - YORK CHILDREN'S WATER FESTIVAL
Presentation and report on the 2000 York Children's Water Festival
Moved by John Adams
Seconded by Michael Di Biase
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the presentation and report on the 2000 York Children's Water
Festival be received CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 1999, York Region, in collaboration with The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and
the Children's Water Institute (formerly the Children's Groundwater Institute) hosted its First Annual
Water Festival at Bruce's Mill Conservation Area. Approximately 4,450 students attended the
Festival
The Regions of Durham, Peel, Wellington, Waterloo, and the City of Toronto also partner with the
Children's Water Institute to provide festivals In 1999, close to 18,000 students across the
participating municipalities were educated on environmental messages concerning water
conservation, water protection, water and technology, the science of water, and the historical use
of water
Since it's inception in 1994, the aim of the Children's Water Institute has been to promote
environmental awareness, specifically as it relates to water, through the initiation and support of
community partnerships To date, 18 festivals have been held with close to 63,000 children
attending
The Children's Groundwater Institute officially changed its name this past year to the Children's
Water Institute in order to better reflect the various aspects of water issues that are already a part
of their festivals The main drive behind this name change was to ensure that children are familiar
with both surface and groundwater issues As a result, the key messages being brought to
students at each festival are
. using water wisely,
. protecting our water supply,
. examining the interface between water and technology,
. celebrating the overwhelming role of water in the ecosystem
The TRCA has committed to partner once again with York Region and the Children's Water
Institute in delivering the 2000 York Children's Water Festival Staff see this as an important
opportunity to further educate society's youngest members on how their actions affect the
watershed in which they live The target for the York Festival in 2000 is to reach 4,000 students
E8 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #1/00 February 11, 2000
The Organizing Committee will be establishing a protocol for designating the Chairing organization
for the Festival, but for 2000, TRCA is providing the Chair The 1999 Chair was from York Region
A York Festival Coordinator, who has a Master's in Environmental Studies, has been hired by the
Children's Water Institute on a 5-month contract to work directly with York Region, TReA, Children's
Water Institute and the many volunteers involved in organizing the Festival
The 2000 York Festival will be held from May 23-26 at Bruce's Mill Conservation Area. The
Organizing Committee is in the early stages of Festival preparations, and it has also established the
various sub-committees which will all begin meeting in the beginning of February
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The Festival Coordinator will be making presentations to York Region District School Board, and
hopefully the Separate School Board, to promote the Festival for registration purposes and to seek
a representative to sit on the committee Information will also be presented to government, industry
and the community in an effort to raise the necessary funds for the Festival TRCA media relations
staff will also help provide the Festival media campaign
For information contact: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264
Date February 2, 2000
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12 05 pm, on February 11, 2000
Dick O'Brien Craig Mather
Chair Secretary Treasurer
/ks
~
V THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #2/00
April 7, 2000 Page E9
The Public Use Advisory Board Meeting #2/00, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office, on
Friday, April 7, 2000 The Chair, Donna Patterson, called the meeting to order at 9'06 am
PRESENT
John Adams Member
Doug Dickerson Vice Chair
Dick O'Brien Chair, Authority
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
Linda Pabst Member
Donna Patterson Chair
REGRETS
Maria Augimeri Member
Michael Oi Biase Member
Frank Scarpitti Member
RES.#E7 /00 - MINUTES
Moved by' Doug Dickerson
Seconded by' Linda Pabst
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/00, held on February 11,2000, be approved CARRIED
PRESENTATION
(a) A presentation by lain Craig on an Olympic White Water Stadium - Claireville Conservation
Area.
RES.#E8/00 - PRESENTATION
I
I
I
Moved by Linda Pabst
Seconded by Doug Dickerson
THAT the above-noted presentation (a) be heard and received CARRIED
E10 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #2/00 April 7, 2000
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES #E9/00 - OLYMPIC WHITE WATER STADIUM - CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION
AREA
Humber River Watershed Receipt of a proposal to locate an Olympic White
Water Stadium within the Claireville Conservation Area, south of Steeles
Avenue, Humber River Watershed, in the City of Brampton, Regional
Municipality of Peel
Moved by Dick O'Brien
Seconded by Doug Dickerson
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Authority, in principle, does not
object to the proposal to locate an Olympic White Water Stadium within the Claireville
Conservation Area, south of Steeles Avenue, subject to further investigation and confirmation
regarding environmental issues, necessary approvals and compatibility with adjacent uses,
THAT staff be directed to work with the proponents, the Claireville Conservation Area Advisory
Committee, the local community, and all levels of government in pursuing this proposal,
AND FURTHER THAT staff keep the Authority informed regarding progress on this project
through periodic update reports to the Public Use Advisory Board CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority is in receipt of a request from lain Craig regarding a proposal to locate an Olympic
White Water Stadium within the Claireville Conservation Area, south of Steeles Avenue While a
definite location has not been identified, the requirements for such a venue would suit the lands
available for lease situated north of Wild Water Kingdom, east of Finch Avenue, south of Steeles
and west of the main West Humber River
Mr Craig has previously expressed an interest in wanting to pursue a possible Canoe and Kayak
Centre at Claireville, and the White Water Stadium proposal has evolved from this earlier work
Mr Craig has initiated discussions With various parties which may be interested in locating such
a facility on these lands As part of these discussions, Mr Craig's proposal has evolved to become
a possible candidate for the 2008 TO Olympic Bid as a venue to host white water canoeing events
Mr Craig has held preliminary discussions with members from the Olympic Bid Committee, and
there appears to be an interest in Claireville as a possible venue site for white water canoeing
events
While specific details regarding a proposed Olympic White Water Stadium are not available, it
would be modelled after the Penrith Whitewater Stadium which has been constructed to host the
upcoming 2000 Summer Olympic Games in Sydney, Australia This course consists of a canoe
slalom course made out of man-made materials to simulate the characteristics of a mountain
torrent, and uses pumped water to provide the peak flows required to create the speed and
difficulty necessary for such an event.
April 7. 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #2/00 E11
The preliminary details associated with this proposal were presented to a joint meeting of the West
Humber Subwatershed Committee and the Claireville Conservation Area Advisory Committee, who
are generally supportive of the concept.
RATIONALE
At present there are two locations (Guelph and St. Catherines) vying to be the venue for white water
canoeing events for the Toronto 2008 Olympic bid Mr Craig has advised that the Olympic Bid
Committee is interested in the Claireville site, given our role as owner of the land involvedl they are
seeking some form of approval in principle from the Authority should there be an interest in pursuing
this further
Staff are of the opinion that a proposed Olympic White Water Stadium in this general location would
be compatible with the adopted Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan, which identifies
the lands for high intensity public use/commercial. Mr Craig has completed some preliminary work
associated with this proposal, and has recommended the formation of a Claireville White Water
Olympic Stadium Committee which would consist of representatives from the Toronto Bid
Committee, Canadian Olympic Committee, TRCA, Canoe Ontario, Canadian Canoe Association,
local politicians and the Claireville Conservation Area Advisory Committee
While there are a number of unknowns involved in the process at this point (including the eventual
success of the Toronto Olympic Bid). staff are of the opinion that it would be in the Authority's best
interests to endorse the White Water Stadium proposal, in principle, subject to further investigation
and confirmation regarding environmental issues, necessary approvals and compatibility with
adjacent uses
WORK TO BE DONE
Staff Will work with the proponents, the Claireville Conservation Area Advisory Committee, the local
community, and all levels of government in pursuing this proposal, and will keep the Authority
informed regarding progress on this project through periodic update reports to the Public Use
Advisory Board
Report Prepared By' Luch Ognibene, extension 5284
Date: March 29, 2000
Attachments (1)
E12 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #2/00 April 7, 2000
Attachment 1
RE: OLYMPIC WHITE WATER STADIUM - CLA1REVILLE CONSERVATION AREA
I Humber River Watershed
C A
en ~+ j
ro a.. . ~
<D +-'
L- C
<( Q)
c E
0 ill
.;z:; 0)
(\j ro
C c
en
ill ~
UJ
c .5Q
0 .~
0
<D L-
'co
> 0
ill
1-
'(ij -.;:t
"r"
0 0-
m
~
I
""
.E~
~~
\ gill
UC
( E~
J A
{g
.,
E
5
""
<U
-to i~ ~i i
,t" ~ - ~ I
.wI l~ ~
i1 r= .E .g, ,..
o ~ :E
~ - ~~~
I~~ "~i
~d-uiri.i' ~& ~ al1it ~l
:::~.... lJEt:~EI5,
~~~ ~ t....liij~~~] i
"Cil'O "C gO w~N ~ en i I
III .,., cti@,c6 ~c-::l::J c,'
o [g,[ [E~e~~c~~~i~~ f i
z eee e~&-g,'3~g,~ '", .gogo
W n..n..o..lIlll. :Coo ODlZn..Zn..o..Ow :
C9 ~ ~ <<""~I~r ~~fll~ :
~ 'C" & , ~';; ,.: _ ~,
-.
April 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #2/00 E13
RES.#E10/00 - BASSMANIA TOURNAMENT TRAIL EVENT
Bass Fishing Tournament - Indian Line Campground, Claireville Reservoir
Receipt of a proposal by Bassmania Tournaments Inc. to hold a live release
bass fishing tournament in the Claireville Reservoir July 3 to 7, 2000; Monday
through Friday, inclusive.
Moved by Doug Dickerson
Seconded by' Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the appropriate Authority officials be
authorized and directed to take whatever action necessary to finalize the agreement between
Bassmania Tournaments Inc and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and give
effect thereto including the obtaining of any approvals and execution of documents
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Bassmania Inc. approached staff in early February, 2000 with the proposal to hold the event in the
reservoir during the first week of July The lands on the east side of the reservoir lying between the
dam and the railroad tracks would constitute the land-based location of the activities and pavilions
associated with the event. The main feature and drawing card for the event would be the live release
fishing competition. The competitors would be professional anglers, most of whom are sponsored
by major sports manufacturers in the sport fishing industry The maximum number of competing
teams would be 25
Spectators would have access to the event via the Indian Line Campground gate and would be able
to view the fishing competition from the shores of the reservoir, wander through the pavilions and
observe other activities intended to add entertainment value The event would be marketed to
attract a broad spectrum of spectators with a focus on drawing family attendance The attendance
for the event during the three days open to the public is projected at 1,000 people per day for this
year
In brief, the schedule for the event is as follows
Monday - July 3, 2000
Pre-fish for competing anglers, set up of pavilions and a media night to promote anglers
partiCipating in the event.
Tuesday - July 4, 2000
As above, with a media day for the outdoor sport manufacturers involved in the event as sponsors
and participants via their pavilion displays
Wednesday- July 5, 2000
Grounds open to the public and media, day 1 of the fishing competition
Thursday - July 6, 2000
Day 2 and the final day of the actual fishing activity; grounds open to the public and the media,
awards presentation to the winners of the bass fishing tournament.
E14 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #2/00 April?,2ooo
Friday, July 7, 2000
Grounds open to the public, children's fishing derby along the shoreline and a children's casting
competition, with sponsor-supported prizes being provided for the young participants.
During the three days open to the public, there will be ongoing seminars provided by professional
anglers to promote the sport of fishing
Various groups would be invited to participate in the event to promote outdoor recreation, water
safety, sportsmanship, conservation and environmental awareness Possible external participants
are the OPP, MNR, Bassmasters (Ontario BASS Federation) The Authority could utilize the
opportunity to promote our conservation/recreation initiatives and our watershed strategies.
RATIONALE
It is the objective of all staff to, wherever possible, pursue and facilitate partnerships with others
including the private sector to promote conservation and environmentally orientated initiatives.
Bassmania Tournaments Inc. has strong links to the sport fishing community as well as the extensive
network of businesses and industries associated with this sport and outdoor recreation in general
In 2000, Bassmania Inc. has 35 tournaments scheduled in various communities throughout Ontario
and the USA. In all events, sportsman-like conduct and live fish release is promoted through a
comprehensive set of rules and regulations that apply to the event participants.
This event represents an opportunity to develop new partnerships to promote our conservation
message
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Pursuant to the Board's review of this report, staff will prepare an agreement between the Authority
and Bassmania to facilitate the event.
Subject to TRCA and MNR approval Bassmania Inc. will, at their cost, stock the reservoir with 1,000
bass
Bassmania will initiate a marketing strategy to promote ,the event which will include newspaper,
magazine, radio, and television The Authority will be marketed as a partner to the event, thereby
bringing public awareness to the Authority and the Indian Line Campground
An invitation will be extended to professional anglers and industry representatives to tour Indian Line
Campground and the reservoir
A press conference will be held to announce the event.
FUTURE BENEF-l:r I
The establishment of an ongoing partnership with Bassmania will facilitate the marketing and i
promotion of our recreational facilities, activities and opportunities. It will open the door to I
I
establishing other outdoor industry contacts/partnerships who are interested in sponsoring and i
promoting conservation projects/initiatives that would benefit the environment, as well as our mutual
corporate goals
April 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #2/00 E15
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Bassmania Tournaments Inc will assume all costs associated with the marketing, promotion and
set up for this event. The Authority will be included as a named insured in all Bassmania insurance
policies associated with the event.
It is estimated that the marketing of pavilion space to industry clientele will produce gross revenues
of $1 00,000 with a net profit of $40,000 The net profit from the rental of pavilion space during the
event will be divided equally between Bassmania and the Authority
All proceeds from overnight camping and the daily gate fees will go directly to the Authority
For information contact: Alan A. Willison, extension 5285
Date. March 24, 2000
RES.#E11 /00 - TRANS CANADA TRAIL ROUTE ON CONSERVATION AUTHORITY LAND
Approval in Principle To report on the preferred route of the Trans Canada
Trail through TRCA jurisdiction and to identify the TRCA's potential trail
development participation
Moved by' Linda Pabst
Seconded by Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the preferred route of the Trans
Canada Trail on Authority land be endorsed in principle,
THA T staff continue to work with the Ontario Trails Council, municipal partners, and the
community to identify and register site specific Trans Canada Trail routes within The Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) jurisdiction,
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to inform the Trans Canada Trail- GTA Working Group
of the TRCA approval in principle CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #7/98, held on August 28, 1998, Resolution #A 156/98 was adopted
"THA T the staff report regarding the facilitation, coordination and confirmation of the
preferred-mute-oNhe-Trans-eanada-TraiNhrough the-6reater -T-oronto Area from the
City of Mississauga to the Township of Uxbridge be received for information,
E16 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #2/00 April 7, 2000
THA T staff establish a committee including municipalities, agencies, trail groups,
Credit Valley Conservation Authority, Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority and
members of the Greater Toronto Area Link Trans Canada Trail Working Group to
facilitate, coordinate and confirm the preferred route of the Trans Canada Trail
through the Greater Toronto Area from the City of Mississauga to the Township of
Uxbridge,
AND FURTHER THAT a letter be forwarded to Bryan Howard, Program Manager,
Ontario Trails Council to confirm the Authority's willingness to act in a coordinating
role."
The Trans Canada Trail (TCT) is a recreational trail, which will link communities in all ten provinces
and three territories, on what will be the longest shared-use trail in the world, projected to be 16,000
km in length The TCT Foundation, whose mandate is to promote and coordinate the planning of
the trail, was established in 1992 as a legacy of the celebration of Canada's 125th birthday The
Foundation is a registered charitable organization with its own corporate Charter and Board of
Directors
The responsibility for the development of the Trail across Canada rests with the individual Trail
Councils established in each province and territory In Ontario, the Ontario Trails Council (OTC) is
responsible for coordinating the development of approximately 3,800 km of TCT across the Province
(Attachment NO.1 - "The Trans Canada Trail in Southern Ontario - Proposed Route") As of January,
2000, approximately 1,450 km of trail have been registered as part of the TCT in Ontario The
development of the Trail is being promoted as a grass-roots initiative, undertaken by the individual
communities, municipalities and conservation authorities, with the assistance of the TCT Foundation
The Foundation carries on a fund raising campaign to support the development of trail Individual
donors are the primary source of contributions, but funds are also raised from corporations,
governments, foundations and through a merchandising program
The TCT will be officially inaugurated in September 2000 at a ceremony to be held in the National
Capital Region To mark this event, Relay 2000 will take place across Canada in the months leading
up to the ceremony Water from the Arctic, Pacific and Atlantic Oceans will be carried in ceremonial
batons by some 5,000 official carriers along the potential route of the TCT I ndividual ceremonies
and events will take place in the communities through which the relay is scheduled to pass on its
way to the Nation s Capital
The TCT preferred alignment follows off-road trail networks, although other options could include
abandoned or active rail and hydro corridors, signed on-street routes, and negotiated rights-of-way
through private lands Each individual community, municipality and conservation authority must
register the TCT route with the Ontario Trails Council and be responsible for the implementation and
maintenance of-tA0Se-seetions-ef TC:r-on'its-land:--Signage;-provided'by,the Foundation, will identify
the trail route, though existing trail names and ownership will continue to exist. TCT registration
does not prohibit the municipalities or conservation authorities from altering the route in the future.
April 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #2/00 E17
TRCA staff has coordinated five Trans Canada Trail - GTA Route Working Group meetings from
January 26, 1999 to February 4, 2000 to plan the preferred route The municipal partners agreed
that the preferred general route within the TRCA jurisdiction (see Attachment No 1) should extend
from the City of Mississauga[Toronto boundary in the west through the City of Pickering to the Town
of Ajax in the east, then head north up the East Duffins Creek into the Town of Uxbridge
The Greater Toronto Area municipalities are at various stages in the TCT route planning process.
At City of Toronto Council meeting held on February 29, March 1 and 2, 2000, Council endorsed the
registration of the concept of the Trans Canada Trail travelling through the City of Toronto Toronto
Council also endorsed the registration of those sections of the existing Waterfront Trail route, from
the western City boundary at Etobicoke Creek to, and including, the Eastern Beaches, as part of the
Trans Canada Trail In addition, Toronto Council requested staff consult with appropriate
councillors, communities and the TRCA to identify options and secure an interim and a long-term
TCT route in the former City of Scarborough The municipalities of Pickering and Ajax are currently
investigating TCT route options within their communities Finally the Town of Uxbridge has
registered a section of the TCT in the town centre and has just completed a TCT routing study with
the community, leading from the town centre south to the Pickering boundary, on the East Duffins
Creek
RATIONALE
The Trans Canada Trail - GT A Route Working Group, which TRCA staff facilitated and which included
representatives from the City of Toronto, the City of Pickering, the Town of Ajax, the Town of
Uxbridge, and the Ontario Trails Council, agreed that the TCT preferred route should pass through
each of their municipalities within the TRCA jurisdiction
In addition, participation in this national project would represent a contribution by the TRCA towards
national unity and would help to bring visitors to the Greater Toronto Area, thus enhancing tourism
Trails and greenways are beneficial to community image and support active living Finally, the
development of the Trans Canada Trail on TRCA lands could serve as a catalyst for further trail
development projects, which would link communities and benefit trail users.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
TRCA staff, working with municipal partners and community groups, will undertake detailed TCT
routing studies. Staff have planned to incorporate TCT route planning into the Glen Major Complex
Management Plan process Also, staff will continue to facilitate the Trans Canada Trail - GT A
Working Group as required, to ensure proper trail linkages between municipalities.
Upon final TCT route selection, staff will report back to the Authority, through the Public Use
Advisory Board, recommending trail registration on site specific TRCA lands.
FINANCIAL DETAILS I
Funding for the trail planning studies are available in the Conservation Land Planning budget under
Account No 408-44 and 408-96
For information contact: Mike Bender, extension 5287 or Dave Dyce, extension 5250
Date March 21, 2000
Attachments (1)
I
E18
.
Attachment 1 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOAR
D #2/00
April 7, 2000
- ~
.-
Ctl
1- 0 ~..
.... . i::
ro.e (1) ~
"'OC...... ~ D
'(u ::J -Z
cO 0 C)
ro'.E 0:: ~ ~4- ~
() "0'" ~
Q.) Q) OJ is
oo..r:. ~ .e t E
C.......o.a.
~ :J 0 (/) 41
....~D:
Q) c
..c ,-
J- (11il
)5 - -
I i-
r
r ---:-=- I
~
.'
~
...
I
April 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #2/00 E19
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9'17 a.m , on April 7, 2000
Donna Patterson Craig Mather
Chair Secretary Treasurer
/ks
,
/
~
, THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00
June 2,2000 Page E20
The Public Use Advisory Board Meeting #3/00, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office, on
Friday, June 2,2000 The Chair, Donna Patterson, called the meeting to order at 11 06 a.m
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Doug Dickerson Vice Chair
Dick O'Brien Chair, Authority
Linda Pabst Member
Donna Patterson Chair
Frank Scarpitti Member
REGRETS
John Adams Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
RES.#E12/00 - MINUTES
Moved by Michael Di Biase
Seconded by Doug Dickerson
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #2/00, held on April 7, 2000, be approved CARRIED
PRESENTATIONS
(a) Presentation by Maxim Engel from AVllnc., in regards to item 76 - Tommy Thompson Park -
Proposal for Web Cameras
RES.#E13/00 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by Frank Scarpitti
Seconded by Linaa Pabst
THAT presentation (a) be heard and received CARRIED
E21 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#E14/00 - HIGHER ORDER TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROTECTION STUDY
City of Vaughan Identification of a preferred alignment for a potential future
higher order transit route (subway) which traverses Authority owned lands,
to be recognized and protected by the City of Vaughan through the land use
planning process
Moved by Michael Di Biase
Seconded by Maria Augimeri
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the City of Vaughan be advised that
the Authority supports the route identified as preferred (A1) by the Technical Advisory
Committee of the City of Vaughan Higher Order Transit Corridor Protection Study;
THA T the City of Vaughan be advised that the Authority supports the alignment meeting
Highway 7 at Millway Avenue and has significant concern with any westerly shift to this
alignment which may impact negatively on the Authority owned lands at the north west corner
of Jane Street and Steeles Avenue,
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to continue to work with the City of Vaughan, the
Technical Advisory Committee and other relevant agencies through subsequent processes,
including an Environmental Assessment (EA) to identify our concerns and ensure that they are
adequately addressed
AMENDMENT
RES.#E15/00
Moved by Doug Dickerson
Seconded by Linda Pabst
THAT the following be inserted as the last paragraph of the main motion
AND FURTHER THAT the Authority be able to appoint at least one representative to any
political committee that may be struck to deal with the proposed subway extension, and that
Councillor Maria Augimeri be one of these representatives
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
-~, ,- --
BACKGROUND
A conceptual higher order transit route has been recognized in approved Official Plan Amendment
#400 (OPA 400) for the City of Vaughan, and the approved Official Plan for the Region of York (York
OP) Specifically, schedule "K" to the City's OPA 400 "Transportation - Recommended Transit
Network" identifies a "Higher Order Transit Corridor Protection Study Area" leading from York
University to the Vaughan Corporate Centre (VCC) , which is centred around the intersection of
June 2 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E22
Highways 400 and 7 Map 10 of the York OP, "Conceptual Transit Network" shows a "Subway"
connection also leading from York University to the VCC The extension of the Spadina Subway
from its current terminus at Downsvlew Station (Sheppard Avenue) to York University is the subject
of an approved EnVIronmental Assessment (EA) However, there has been no commitment to the
construction of the subway extension to York University at this time
The policies of OPA 400 with respect to this potential transit corridor, require that "Studies (shall) be
undertaken as the need is identified, to confirm the feasibility of providing higher order transit in
potential corridors and to examine the appropriate technology and other route options." In addition,
Section 8 3.2 v) states that the City shall support the extension of the Spadina Subway to York
University
In 1999, the City of Vaughan initiated the Higher Order Transit Corridor Protection Study which is
intended to fulfill the policy requirements of OPA 400 with regard to protection of an alignment for
a potential Higher Order Transit Route The outcome of this study will be to approve an Official Plan
Amendment (OPA 529) which identifies the preferred route for protection through the land use
planning process
A Technical Advisory Committee (T AC) has been set up with staff from affected agencies and
groups including, the City of Vaughan, the Region of York, the Toronto Transit Commission (TIC),
the City of Toronto, York University, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and the
consulting team retained by the City to undertake the study TRCA staff has been providing input
to the City and their consultants, through the T AC, with regard to matters of Authority interest.
As part of its mandate, the City'S consulting team completed the needs assessment for the corridor,
by comparing the effectiveness of various transit alternatives including Do Nothing, Additional Lanes
on existing roads, High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes, Reserved Bus Lanes, Upgrading the Bradford
Go Rail Service and a Rapid Transit Corridor The result of this phase of the Study was that the
opportunity for a Rapid Transit Corridor should be protected Six conceptual corridors were
identified and further assessed with two being identified as preferred (A and B) when assessed for
Transportation Design, Transportation Services, Social Environment, Natural Environment, Land
Use, Implementation and Cost. The two preferred alternatives are identified on the attached figure
Further consideration of the final two preferred alignments has resulted in the recommendation of
Route A as preferred by the T AC Staff of all agencies on the T AC have indicated a technical
preference for Route A over Route B
As identified on the attached figure, the preferred alignment runs from York University, west along
Steeles Avenue, north on the west side of Jane Street (through the Authority owned former Agnew
Lands at the north west corner of Jane Street and Steeles Avenue) to meet Millway Avenue at
Highway 7 In response to concerns expressed by landowners north of Highway 407, the
Consulting team 'has-ftlfther"fe\tiewed .the-preferred-atignment '(A)-;-"Sp-ecifically 4 potential east-west
shifts to the portion of the preferred alignment between Steeles Avenue and Highway 7 As the
result of input from the affected land owners, the team has looked at the original preferred alignment
(A 1 - meeting Millway Avenue at Highway 7), an alternative that meets Edgeley Boulevard at
Highway 7 (A4 - one block west) and two alignments in between Millway Avenue and Edgeley
Boulevard (A2 and A3) Route A 1 comes out strongly preferred by all members of the T AC for a
number of technical reasons, including but not limited to, cost (length) and servicing of the VCC
E23 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
The consulting team has reviewed the preferred alignment (A 1) in a sufficient amount of detail to
verify that the 23 metre wide corridor can be accommodated without negatively impacting any
existing or approved structures
RATIONALE
While the impacts to the natural environment of both Routes A and S can be adequately mitigated,
and Route B does not have any direct impacts on Authority owned lands, Route A provides a
significant opportunity to increase awareness of Slack Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) A Rapid
TranSit Corridor in close proximity (Route A) to the SCPV has the significant potential to positively
Impact the operation A subway station within walking distance of the Village has the potential to
Increase attendance from both the residential and tourist populations, and increase the visibility of
the Village in the GT A marketplace However, the SCPV contains a significant number of cultural
heritage buildings and structures, many of which have undergone substantial restoration There are
concerns about the protection of these structures with the construction of a major transit corridor
as well as concerns about the impacts to the BCPV business during construction The viability of
the Village is premised on a certain level of visitation Staff has verified that for the preferred A 1
alignment, any negative impacts on our Master Plans and objectives for the BCPV or the former
Agnew Lands can be mitigated
Staff feel that impacts of Route A 1 to the natural environment can be adequately mitigated
Additionally, the easement across Authority owned lands at the north west corner of Jane and
Steeles (the former Agnew Lands) required for the corridor would be at the east edge of the block
and would not have any direct impacts to the existing structures. Additionally, it would leave a larger
uninterrupted block (west of the preferred corridor alignment) to accommodate any future use of
the land
Potential Impacts to the Slack Creek Valley Corridor, and impacts on the former Agnew Lands
Increases significantly as the alignment shifts to the west. The 23 metre wide corridor would be in
closer prOXimity to a tributary of the Slack Creek Additionally, the easement required for the
COrridor would sever the former Agnew Land holdings approximately down the centre, directly
Impacting the eXisting heritage buildings, and providing a greater obstacle for future use of this land
holding
In light of the above, staff recommend that the Authority support the preferred alignment meeting
Millway Avenue at Highway 7, and have significant concerns with potential westerly shifts Having
a rapid transit corridor in the location of Route A 1 has the potential to positively impact the Slack
Creek Pioneer Village Operation However, the following very real concerns will have to be
addressed through subsequent processes relating to the transit corridor, including an Environmental
Assessment;
0 PotentiaHmpacts-to -the nattlral-environm ent
. Possible damage from vibration during construction
. Loss of bUSiness during construction
. Impact to /Ioss of buffer on Steeles Avenue boundary of SCPV
. Servicing to heritage buildings on northwest property
. Sedimentation and erosion control
June 2, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E24
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
TRCA staff will continue to work with our municipal partners and other relevant agencies through
subsequent processes to ensure that Authority interests are protected as the alignment is secured
and construction undertaken, in the event a northerly extension to the Spadina Subway is
committed to
Report prepared by' Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date May 23, 2000
Attachments (1)
".
l> m
1&-2IINl ::: N
U1
, -- Dl
, ()
, ::T
I 3
11 ,
, m
, ::J
,
I .-+
V I ....
/ 23
I
____J
ii)
"0
C
ill
c:
0
c
(f)
m
~
------- 0
:S
(f)
0
JJ
-<
.....- ill
0
~
JJ
0
'*"
(,J
--
0
0
CITY OF TORONTO
RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR YORK UN~ERSITY:-----..
STATION YONGE- 0
ALTERNATIVES SPADlNA UBWAY
lOOP EN~RqNMENTAL
ALTERNATIVE 'A' APPROXIMATE 0 ASSESSMENT
ALTE N ' , STATION HIGHER ORDER TRANSIT FilE 6 LOCATION:
I R AliVE B · ~ a =.. · LOCATIONS CORRIDOR PROTECTION STUDY 15,66.5
AND TRANSPORTATION/TRANSIT 15,66,4 DATE. MARCH 30, 2000 L
c
APPUCAnON: CITY OF VAUGHAN FUNCTIONAL DESIGN STUDY REPORT 6 :J
<D
OPA 528 AND OPA 529 CITY OF VAUGHAN NOT TO SCALE .N
COMMUNITY PlANNING DEPARTMENT
N
0
0
0
June 2, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E26
RES.#E16/00 - GREENWOOD CONSERVATION AREA
Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham
Duffins Creek Watershed, CFN 24321 Renewal of a management
agreement with the Town of Ajax for the portion of the Greenwood
Conservation Area within the Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham,
Duffins Creek Watershed
Moved by Marla Augimeri
Seconded by Doug Dickerson
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the management agreement with the
Town of Ajax for the Greenwood Conservation Area be renewed for one year;
AND FURTHER THAT Authority staff work with municipal staff towards consolidating these
lands and other suitable green space lands under a comprehensive management agreement
with the Town of Ajax CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Greenwood Conservation Area comprises approximately 283 hectares of green space on
Duffins Creek in the Town of Ajax and City of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham Until the
beginning of 1997, Greenwood was operated for active recreation, including picnicking, swimming,
hiking, group camping, snowmobiling and cross country skiing During this period, the park was
staffed on a full time basis and an entrance fee was collected
Since 1996, the Conservation Areas Section moved toward self-funding of the Authority's outdoor
recreation operations Measures to reach this objective included significant increases in revenues
from user fees, and cost reductions, especially In the area of labour expenses As part of this
change In operations full time staffing was eliminated at Greenwood and the area was closed, other
than for special events and group camping, as of spring 1997 The decision to close Greenwood
was based on the need for a high level of subsidy per visitor owing to relatively low attendance and
high fixed operating costs
In the latter part of 1998, Town of Ajax staff began discussions with Authority staff to explore options
for opening that portion of Greenwood within the Town to regular public use These discussions
were motivated by concerns on the part of Ajax residents and staff that a valuable recreation
resource was being lost, and by the Town's need for additional parks and recreation space in
anticipation of future residential development.
In spring of 1999, the Greenwood Conservation Area within the Town of Ajax was placed under
management agreement with the municipality for 8: one year period, with an option to renew on
mutual consent
E27 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
RATIONALE
With the Town of Ajax assuming the management responsibilities for Greenwood, the park was
opened for public access seven days a week and provided a significant municipal staff presence
Improvements were undertaken to the existing buildings, and last fall the Town installed four mini
soccer fields which are scheduled for use as part of this season's soccer program The Town is also
in the process of developing a lease for the existing residential house located on the property, which
would include park attendant responsibilities
The working relationship amongst staff has worked well, and few complaints have been received
regarding the municipality's management of the lands. Those complaints received by Authority staff
have been specific to the installation of the mini soccer fields, and objections related to increased
traffic and use of the area. In the opinion of Authority staff, the use of the area is not unlike the
recreational uses made of the property as part of the Conservation Area operations by the Authority
Staff are of the opinion that the proposed agreement meets both Authority and Town objectives
The agreement allows for public use of Greenwood without additional costs to the Authority, and in
turn provides the municipality with additional lands for recreational use It also provides for an
acceptable level of maintenance and allows for public presence on the lands to reduce unwanted
activity and enhance public safety ,
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
In discussing the renewal of the Greenwood management agreement for an additional one year
term, Authority staff has inquired about the preparation of an overall management plan by the Town
of Ajax, which would address long term use of Greenwood by the municipality Municipal staff are
committed to the preparation of such a plan, and are confident funds will be made available in the
Town's 2001 capital budget.
Additionally, Authority staff raised the possibility of including additional green space lands under
management agreement with the Town of Ajax, and consolidating the existing Paulyn Park and Ajax
Waterfront agreements into one comprehensive document. Municipal staff are receptive to pursuing
this matter further with Authority staff; progress on this initiative will be reported to a future meeting
of the Public Use Advisory Board
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The Town of Ajax has assumed all maintenance costs for Greenwood, in addition to the capital costs
assOCiated With the construction of the mini soccer fields Property taxes associated with the lands
under management agreement will continue to be paid by the municipality
Report Prepared By Luch Ognibene, extension 5284
Date May 23, 2000 -,", -, .- .., .-
RES.#E17/00 - AL TONA FOREST COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE
Terms of Reference Endorsement. To endorse the Altona Forest Community
Stewardship Committee Terms of Reference
June 2 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E28
Moved by Maria Augimeri
Seconded by Doug Dickerson
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Altona Forest Community
Stewardship Committee Terms of Reference be received,
THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority endorse the Terms of Reference,
THAT staff be directed to support the Stewardship Committee by providing technical expertise
and administrative support;
THAT the Chair of the Altona Forest Community Stewardship Committee will communicate to
the Conservation Authority through the Public Use Advisory Board at least once each year;
AND FURTHER THAT the Ministry of Natural Resources, the City of Pickering and the Chair
of the Altona Forest Community Stewardship Committee be 50 advised CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #5/95, held on June 23, 1995, Resolution #A 160/95 was adopted
THA T the Altona Forest Enwonmental Management Plan, dated June 23, 1995
(Appendix AM 1/95), be approved,
THA T any additional comments received before June 23, 1995 from Dr Speirs, the
Friends of Altona Forest and Petticoat Creek or others be incorporated into the plan,
where appropriate, and staff bring any substantive changes to the attention of the
Authority,
AND FURTHER THAT the 10 ha ecological Reserve be formally designated the J
Murray Speirs Ecological Reserve, once Dr Speirs has donated approximately 2 8 ha
of his land to be included as part of the Altona Forest property "
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) owns approximately 53 hectares of
environmentally significant land known as the Altona Forest. The property is located in the City of
Pickering, south of Finch Avenue and north of Sheppard Avenue, between Rosebank Road and
Altona Road The area immediately surrounding the Altona Forest has been developed over the
past five years, for residential and Institutional uses
The Altona Forest property consists of mature forest with old growth characteristics and numerous
early to mid successional vegetation communities, such as old fields and wet meadows The Altona
Forest contrlblReS.t0-the-eieregI0n's-gfeeASpace--network-and-enhances ,the -health and biodiversity
of plants and animals Within the region The Altona Forest also provides essential habitat for a large
number of flora and fauna speCies, facilitates wildlife movement as part of the Rouge-Duffins Wildlife
COrridor, replenishes groundwater storage and reduces the potential for flooding downstream
E29 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
Following the property acquisition, the TRCA developed an Environmental Management Plan to
secure the site and to protect and maintain the ecological integrity of the property The
Management Plan was developed with input from other agencies, landowners and community
groups One key recommendation In the Management Plan was the establishment of an Altona
Forest Community Stewardship Committee The purpose for this Stewardship Committee was to
prOVide a forum for public input and assist the TRCA in determining the specific needs and actions
required to manage the Altona Forest property
TRCA staff, working with the City of Pickering and existing community groups, held a number of
public information sessions over the past -four years, as the community around the forest
established The purpose for the information sessions was to educate new home owners about the
forest and obtain public representation on the Stewardship Committee
Throughout 1999 TRCA staff chaired a series of community meetings to draft the Stewardship
Committee Terms of Reference (Attachment No 1)
The Terms of Reference has proposed that the Stewardship Committee should consist of one voting
representative from each of the following
. Dr Murray Speirs
0 Friends of Altona Forest and Petticoat Creek
0 Pickering Naturalists
0 Heritage Pickering
. Pickering Conservation Association
. Local Recognized Community Groups
. Local Durham Region Schools Adjacent to Altona Forest
. Fnends of the Rouge
. Save the Rouge Valley System
. 10000 Trees
Also, the following public agencies should be established as ex-officio non-voting representatives
on the Stewardship Committee
. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
. City of Pickering
. Ministry of Natural Resources
0 Rouge Park
The following is the Stewardship Committee mandate outlined in the Terms of Reference
Make-recommeooatiofls-regar-ding.-the-m2tflagement'-and-monitoring 'of the Altona Forest
property, including the J Murray Speirs Ecological Reserve The recommendations must
be consistent with the goals and objectives of the approved management plan and they
should detail, but not be limited to the following
. property watershed management,
. natural heritage management,
. public access and parking,
June 2, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E30
0 public uses for educational, interpretive and recreational opportunities;
0 locations for trails,
.. fencing of the property,
. property edge management,
. flora and fauna monitoring programs.
Identify and enhance the positive relationships between the Altona Forest property and its
neighbours through the development of public awareness and stewardship programs.
These programs could include
. community action plans such as natural regeneration projects which foster
community stewardship,
. pilot or demonstration projects such as trail development or interpretive programs
which encourage community participation,
. public Information/educational projects, including displays, pamphlets, direct
mailings, signs, newspaper articles and television and radio coverage on special
events, which increase awareness of the Altona Forest;
0 community fund raising
Develop partnerships and establish communication links with the community and the
Conservation Authority Outreach activities should include, but not be limited to, the
following
.. consult and involve individuals, interest groups, communities, business, industry,
and government agencies in the management and stewardship of the Altona Forest
property,
. report progress, on a yearly basis, to the Authority's Public Use Advisory Board,
. partiCipate on Authority technical working groups,
. review and comment on draft resource management documents related to the
Altona Forest property,
. host local meetings with the community"
RATIONALE I
The Altona -Forest--Community-6tewardship-Committee-will-help-the -TRCA to establish and
implement activities that are consistent with the goal, objectives, policies and guidelines of the
approved Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan The Stewardship Committee will also
assist TRCA to communicate with the public, foster a community land stewardship ethic, and to work
In partnership to accomplish watershed management objectives
E31 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
The Stewardship Committee Terms of Reference were developed by TRCA staff and have
incorporated comments from the City of Pickering, Dr Murray Speirs and local community groups,
who would form the Committee
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
TRCA staff will continue to implement the approved Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan
Staff will also attend Altona Forest Community Stewardship Committee meetings, provide technical
expertise and administrative support for the Committee
The Stewardship Committee Chair will communicate to the Conservation Authority through the
Public Use Advisory Broad at least once each year, updating the Authority on Committee work.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for implementing the Altona Forest Management Plan and the support of the Stewardship
Committee are available in the Conservation Land Planning budget under Account No 408-46
For information contact Mike Bender, extension 5287
Date May 23, 2000
Attachments (1)
June 2, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E32
Attachment 1
Attachment 1
AL TONA FOREST COMMUNITY
STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE
TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
February 2000
E33 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
1
1 0 INTRODUCTION
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) owns approximately 53 hectares of
environmentally significant land known as the Altona Forest. The property is located in the City of
Pickering, south of Finch Avenue and north of Sheppard Avenue, between Rosebank Road and
Altona Road The property consists of mature forest with old growth characteristics and numerous
early to mid successional vegetation communities, such as old fields and wet meadows The Altona
Forest contributes to the bioregion's greenspace network and enhances the health and biodiversity
of plants and animals within the region The forest also provides essential habitat for a large
number of flora and fauna species, facilitates wildlife movement as part of the Rouge-Duffins
Wildlife Corridor, replenishes groundwater storage areas, and reduces the potential for flooding
downstream.
The area surrounding the Altona Forest property is in various stages of development for residential
and institutional purposes Following the property acquisition, the TRCA developed an
Environmental Management Plan in 1996 to secure the site and to protect and maintain the
ecological integrity of the property The Management Plan was developed with input from other
agencies, landowners and community groups
At Authority Meeting #5/95, held on June 23, 1995, the Conservation Authority approved Resolution
#A 160/95 which states in part:
"THAT the Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan, dated June 23, 1995
(Appendix AM 1/95), be approved",
One objective in the Management Plan is the creation of an Altona Forest Community Stewardship
Committee. This Committee will provide a forum for public input and help the TRCA in determining
the specific needs and actions required to manage the Altona Forest property
20 COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
2.1 COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES
The Community Stewardship Committee should consist of one voting representative from each of
the following
. pr Murray Speirs
. Friends of Altona Forest and Petticoat Creek
. ickering Naturalists
. eritage Pickering
. ickering Conservation Association
. ocal Recognized Commulllty Grot,Jps
. , ocal Durham Region Schools Adjacent to Altona Forest
. Friends or the Rouge
. Save the Rouge Valley System
. 10 000 Trees
June 2 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E34
2
The Committee members can designate an alternate who would attend meetings that the regular
member is unavailable for
The following public agencies should be established as ex-officio non-voting representatives on the
Stewardship Committee.
. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
. City of Pickering
. Ministry of Natural Resources
. Rouge Park
2.2 COMMITTEE SELECTION
A Selection Committee will be established if more than one representative and an alternate
express an interest in sitting on the Community Stewardship Committee The Selection
Committee will consist of two Conservation Authority staff and one City of Pickering staff The
Selection Committee will take the following into consideration
. Demonstrated interest and/or active participation in land stewardship, ecological
restoration, recreation, community and heritage issues,
. The ability of the applicant to meet potential time commitments
2.3 ADDITIONAL VOLUNTEERS
Interested residents will be encouraged to attend Stewardship Committee meetings and participate
on the Stewardship Committee at the Sub Committee level Depending on the amount of public
interest, up to three Sub Committees could be established that would support and assist the main
Community Stewardship Committee members in developing and completing potential projects. The
Sub Committees could be divided into three groups such as public outreach, public use and natural
and cultural heritage
One person from the Main Stewardship Committee will oversee and be a member of the Sub
Committee That person will report back to the Main Committee about Sub Committee activities
2.4 SELECTION OF COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Chair will be elected by the voting members of the Stewardship Committee The appointment
shall be for.two years and.,tRe 'ifleuRlbent will'.se-eli~jble,for-f-e-elect~0n for one additional term.
The Committee will also elect a Vice-Chairperson and a Secretary under the same conditions as
the Chairperson. the Vice-Chair will not be considered an automatic replacement for the Chair
25 RULES OF CONDuct
The Community Stewardship Committee will follow the Rules of Conduct of the TRCA, as adopted
by Resolution #3 of the Authority Meeting #2/86 J or as may be amended If not otherwise covered,
Roberts Rules of Order will be followed
E35 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
3
Decisions should be made on the basis of group consensus as much as possible. If voting is
necessary, a quorum will consist of half of the Stewardship Committee members
The Committee will meet a minimum of once per quarter Meetings shall only be scheduled when
there is sufficient business to justify the meeting A meeting may be cancelled on the authority of
the Chair for cause (e g a major snowstorm) The date of the next meeting should be set at each
meeting, or at the call of the Chair
The Community Stewardship Committee is not a formal commenting body of the TRCA. The
Stewardship Committee will develop and make recommendations to the TRCA, which assist with
the implementation of the approved Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan TRCA staff
will advise the Stewardship Committee of Authority projects being planned or undertaken within the
Altona Forest property or watershed, and of major planning initiatives or projects of others where
the Authority may be a commenting or permitting body
26 REPORTING RELATIONSHIP
The Community Stewardship Committee will communicate to the Conservation Authority through
the Public Use Advisory Board at least once each year The Committee Chair will be required to
coordinate communication reports to the above noted Board, with the assistance of Conservation
Authority staff
All Stewardship Committee project proposals and communications shall be submitted to the TRCA
staff contact for review and appropriate TRCA approval
2.7 .ADM!NISTRA.T!VE SUPPORT
The TRCA will provide administrative support to assist in the operation of the Stewardship
Committee and in the implementation of their projects, within the limits of TRCA resources
30 COMMITTEE MANDATE
The Conservation Authority identified the necessity of establishing the Community Stewardship
Committee for the Altona Forest property to communicate with the public, foster a land
stewardship ethic, and to work in partnership to accomplish watershed management objectives
The Stewardship Committee will help to establish and implement activities that are consistent
with the goals, objectives, policies and guidelines of the approved Altona Forest Environmental
Management Plan
The Altona Forest Community Stewardship Committee will
(a) Make recommendations regarding the management and monitoring of the
Altona Forest property, including the J rv1urr9Y Speirs Ecological Reserve
The recommendations must be conslsieht with the goals ahd objectives of
the approved mahagement plan and they should detail, but not be limited to
the following
. property watershed management;
June 2, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E36
4
. natural heritage management;
. public access and parking,
. public uses for educational, interpretive and recreational opportunities,
. locations for trails,
. fencing of the property;
. property edge management;
. flora and fauna monitoring programs
(b) Identify and enhance the positive relationships between the Altona Forest
property and its neighbours through the development of public awareness
and stewardship programs These programs could include
. community action plans such as natural regeneration projects which
foster community stewardship,
. pilot or demonstration projects such as trail development or interpretive
programs which encourage community participation,
. public information/educational projects, including displays, pamphlets,
direct mailings, signs, newspaper articles and television and radio
coverage on special events, which increase awareness of the Altona
Forest;
. community fund raising
(c) Develop partnerships and establish communication links with the community
and the Conservation Authority Outreach activities should include, but not
be limited to, the following
. consult and involve individuals, interest groups, communities, business,
industry, and government agencies in the management and stewardship
of the Altona Forest property;
. report progress, on a yearly basis, to-the Authority's Public Use Advisory
Board,
. participate on AlJthority technical working groLJps,
. review and comment on draft resource management documents related
to the Altona Forest property;
. host local meetings with the community
E37 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
RES.#E18/00 - BOYD NORTH AND GLASSCO PARK STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE
Terms of Reference Endorsement. To endorse the Boyd North and Glassco
Park Stewardship Committee Terms of Reference
Moved by' Michael Di Biase
Seconded by' Linda Pabst
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Boyd North and Glassco Park
Stewardship Committee Terms of Reference be received,
THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority endorse the Terms of Reference,
THAT staff be directed to support the Stewardship Committee by providing technical expertise
and administrative support;
THAT the Chair of the Boyd North and Glassco Park Stewardship Committee will communicate
to the Conservation Authority through the Public Use Advisory Board at least once each year;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Vaughan and the Chair of the Boyd North and Glassco Park
Stewardship Committee be so advised
AMENDMENT
RES.#E19/00
Moved by Michael Di Biase
Seconded by' Doug Dickerson
THAT following be inserted as the last paragraph of the main motion
AND FURTHER THAT the proposed Boyd North and Glassco Park Stewardship Committee
structure be amended from Local Ratepayers Association to one representative from each of
two Local Ratepayers Associations, and that the following be identified as voting members
Chair, East Humber Subwatershed Committee
City of Vaughan Councillor
York Regional Councillor
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #6/99, held on June 25, 1999, Resolution #A 177/99 was adopted
"THA T the Boyd North and Glassco Park Management Plan, dated May 1999, as
attached, be approved,
June 2, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E38
THA T staff be directed to assist in the establishment of a community stewardship
committee for Boyd North and Glassco Park made up of interested citizens, interest
groups and organizations, to help the Authority with the detail planning, management
and implementation of the Boyd North and Glassco Park Management Plan,
HAT staff circulate the Boyd North and Glassco Park Management Plan to the Ontario
Heritage Foundation, the McMichael Canadian Art Collection and the City of Vaughan
for endorsement;
THA T staff send a letter of thanks to the members of the Boyd North and Glassco Park
Advisory Committee for their assistance with the preparation of the Management Plan,
THA T copies of the Boyd North and Glassco Park Management Plan be circulated to
the members of the Boyd North and Glassco Park Advisory Committee, the City of
Vaughan, and other appropriate agencies, groups and individuals,
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to utilize the Strategy for Public Use on
Conservation Authority Lands (1995) when considering new public uses on the
Authority's Boyd North lands."
Boyd North and Glassco Park are located within the Humber River watershed and follow the course
of the East Branch of the Humber River in the City of Vaughan (Figure 1) The planning area is
bounded by Stegman's Mill Road and Teston Side Road to the north, Rutherford Road to the south,
Islington Avenue to the west, and Pine Valley Drive to the east. Major Mackenzie Drive crosses the
site (Map 1) The entire planning area encompasses 688 hectares, Boyd North is 494 hectares and
Glassco Park is 194 hectares in size
Boyd North is owned by The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority This property includes the
Kortright Centre for Conservation, the Boyd Conservation Field Centre, the Authority's plant nursery,
William T Foster Woods, and lands under management agreement with the McMichael Canadian
Art Collection Glassco Park is owned by the Province of Ontario, through the Ontario Heritage
Foundation, and is managed by the Authority on behalf of the Province
Boyd North and Glassco Park contain many significant terrestrial features, most of which have been
designated as Environmentally Significant Areas by the TRCA, or as Areas of Natural and Scientific
Interest by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Boyd North and Glassco Park are currently
covered mainly by meadow, farm field, and forest, with other habitat types such as plantation,
wetland, and thicket also present. Forest cover is well connected on the property and provides a
number of alternatives for species movement.
The fauna found .within Boyd Nor.th..and GlaSSG0-Par-k r.eflect.the diversity and quality of terrestrial
habitats found within these lands Many species are considered Species of Concern by the TRCA
according to their needs or sensitivities
E39 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
Heritage resources Include Aboriginal and Euro-Canadian archaeological sites, historic structures
(e g , farm houses), and the Toronto Carrying-Place Trail The most significant archaeological
resources include the late Iroquoian Kleinburg Ossuary located in Glassco Park, and the Seed-
Barker site, a Late lroquoian village The 'log house' at the corner of Pine Valley Drive and Rutherford
Road is the only building listed as a significant heritage structure on the site
The TRCA, with the assistance of the Boyd North and Glassco Park Advisory Committee, completed
the Management Plan in 1990 to establish a plan for the future management of the properties.
Representatives from the following agencies/groups were invited to participate on the Boyd North
and Glassco Park Advisory Committee Humber Watershed Alliance, West Humber Naturalists,
Action to Restore a Clean Humber, regional and municipal staff, elected representatives, local
ratepayer groups, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Recreation, the
York Region Board of Education, York Catholic District School Board, the Ontario Heritage
Foundation, the McMichael Canadian Art Collection, local developers, and Authority staff
One key recommendation in the Management Plan was the establishment of a Community
Stewardship Committee that has representation from the Boyd North and Glassco Park Advisory
Committee The purpose for this Stewardship Committee was to assist TRCA to implement the
approved Management Plan It was noted that the Committee should study and make
recommendations to TRCA staff on specific aspects such as trails, education, and communications
From September to December 1999, TRCA staff chaired three community meetings to draft the
Stewardship Committee Terms of Reference (Attachment No 1)
The Terms of Reference has proposed that the Boyd North and Glassco Park Stewardship
Committee should consist of one voting representative from each of the following
. Action to Restore a Clean Humber (ARCH)
. Federation of Ontario Naturalists (FON)
. First Nations
0 Hike Ontario
. Kleinburg Business Improvement Association (BIA)
0 Local Ratepayers Associations
0 McMichael Canadian Art Collection
0 Ontario Streams
0 Vaughan Chamber of Commerce
0 West Humber Naturalists
0 York Region School Boards
Also the following representatives should be established as ex-officio, non-voting members on the
Stewardship Committee:
. Chair, East Humber Subwatershed Committee
. City of Vaughan CounCillor
. City of Vaughan staff
. Ministry of Natural Resources
0 Ontario Heritage Foundation
0 Toronto Region Conservation Authority staff
June 2, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E40
0 York Region
0 York Region Police
The following is the Stewardship Committee mandate outlined in the Terms of Reference
The Committee shall advise the TRCA concerning the management of these areas They
shall establish and implement activities that are consistent with the goals and objectives of
the approved Boyd North and Glassco Park Management Plan The areas of interest may
include, but are not limited to
" Fundraising
" Communications / Education
" Restoration Plans
" Trail Plans
" Recommendations for updating the Management Plan
Site Development and Management
A general task outline that the Community Stewardship Committee may assist the Authority to
implement, is identified as follows All priorities can be reviewed and re-evaluated in terms of their
feasibility at any time throughout the process
Phase 1
" Prepare a communications plan to raise awareness and inform surrounding
communities
. Establish a network of groups and individuals interested in participating in a
volunteer program
. Establish a pnvate land stewardship program, which encourages landowners to
preserve woodlots and other wildlife habitat on their property and initiate contacts
With landowners
. Prepare access and trail development plans
. Rehabilitate trails in sensitive habitats or disturbed sites
. Start construction of the inter-regional trail and other new trails
. Build trail heads with signage
. Monitor the trail for invasive plant material and prevent spread by using barriers etc.
" Monitor the presence of noxious weeds on site and remove in accordance with local
noxious weed bylaws
. Organize volunteers to pick invasive exotic plant species such as garlic mustard,
buckthorn, dog strangling vine and purple loosestrife
. Prepare a detailed vegetation management plan
. Identify priority areas for restoration within the primary restoration areas
. Conduct a heritage resources management study, including recommendations for
ways to reuse existing buildings
. Prepare natural and cultural heritage interpretative plans
. Undertake a planning exercise for the Boyd Conservation Area (south of Rutherford
Road) as the management of these lands directly influences Boyd North and Glassco
Park
. Establish a 30 m Wide riparian buffer planting along each side of watercourses using
pioneer species of trees and shrubs
E41 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
Phase 2
. Implement the remaining components (trail construction and bridges) of the William
Granger Greenway and the inter-regional trail, some secondary loop trails may be
implemented if funding or volunteer efforts are available
0 Complete the areas' signage system
. Complete all marketing and educational literature and information for distribution
purposes.
0 Finalize secondary trail system implementation
. Complete all trailhead implementation
RATIONALE
The Boyd North and Glassco Park Stewardship Committee will help the TRCA to establish and
Implement activities that are consistent with the vision, values, and recommendations of the
approved Boyd North and Glassco Park Management Plan The Stewardship Committee will also
assist TRCA to communicate with the public, foster a community land stewardship ethic, and to work
In partnership to accomplish watershed management objectives
The Stewardship Committee Terms of Reference were developed by TRCA staff and have
incorporated comments from the City of Vaughan, and community groups, who would form the
Committee
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
TRCA staff will continue to implement the approved Boyd North and Glassco Park Management
Plan Staff will also attend Boyd North and Glassco Park Stewardship Committee meetings, provide
technical expertise and administrative support for the Committee
The Stewardship Committee Chair will communicate to the Conservation Authority through the
Public Use Advisory Board at least once each year, updating the Authority on Committee work.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for implementing the Boyd North and Glassco Park Management Plan and the support of
the Stewardship Committee are available in the Conservation Land Planning budget under Account
No 408-41
For information contact Mike Bender, extension 5287
Date May 23,2000
Attachments (1)
"-
June 2 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E42
Attachment 1
Attachment 1
BOYD NORTH and GLASSCO PARK
STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE
TERMS OF REFERENCE
FINAL DRAFT
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
V'\8N"ToR.wpd Updated 99-12-02
E43 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
December 1999
1 0 INTRODUCTION
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) initiated the preparation of a
comprehensive management plan for the Boyd North and Glassco Park area. This Plan includes
a description and evaluation of the property based on relevant plans and policies, landscape
features and functions, constraints and opportunities The Plan identifies specific management
zones These management zones are areas in which a certain type of activity may be undertaken
For example, within a Natural Environment Zone, stream rehabilitation may occur; within a Public
Use Zone, recreation activities may be recommended The Plan provides a framework for the
Authority to determine priorities for future initiatives including the protection of natural features and
habitat regeneration. The Plan provides a framework for determining the ecological appropriateness
of any proposed public use locations and ensures that the integrity and diversity of the area are
maintained
The Mission Statement for the Authority states that with one-third of Ontario's population within its
area of jurisdiction, the Authority acts in the community's interest through advocating and
implementing watershed management programs that:
. maintain and improve the quality of the region's lands and waters,
. contribute to public safety from flooding and erosion,
. provide for the acquisition of conservation and hazard lands, and
. enhance the quality and variety of life in the community by using its lands for inter-
regional outdoor recreation, heritage preservation and conservation education.
Planning efforts have shown that interest and community groups have grown more concerned with
the impact of land use change on the remaining natural landscapes within the GTA. At the same
time, user groups, businesses and municipalities have expressed a growing interest in using public
lands for a variety of outdoor recreation, ecological restoration and other uses The provision of
public uses on TRCA land must consider economic factors, the needs of the community and the
needs of the natural landscape to ensure it is protected and managed properly
At the outset of the planning process for Boyd North and Glassco Park, the Advisory Committee
established a vision statement and values that would gUide decisions during the development of
the management plan
VISION STATEMENT
Boyd North and Glassco Park will be a special place for futUre generations to enjoy environmental
learning, recreational activity, natLJral, cultural and heritage experiences p~blic aotivities will occur
In association with preserving and enhancing the natUral, cultural and heritage resoUrces of the
area.
Y'\BN^ToR.wpd Updated 99-12-02
June 2, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E44
VALUES
. Ensure that an extensive and diverse ecosystem is protected and enhanced
. Ensure that the community is integrated with nature through opportunities for acceptable
public uses
. Ensure that we create an exceptional legacy for future generations
. Ensure that the lands will provide for opportunities to learn about the natural, cultural, and
heritage resources
. Ensure that Legacy' A Strategy for a Healthy Humber is supported in the Boyd North and
Glassco Park Management Plan, including the preservation, restoration and celebration of
the natural, cultural, and heritage resources
For the purpose ofthis project, the Boyd North and Glassco Park area includes the Kortright Centre
for Conservation, Boyd Conservation Field Centre, the Authority's tree nursery, Foster Woods, and
lands under management agreement with the McMichael Canadian Art Collection Glassco Park
is owned by the Province of Ontario through the Ontario Heritage Foundation and is managed by
the Authority on behalf of the Province
The Authority approved the Boyd North and Glassco Park Management Plan at its meeting #6/99
held on June 25, 1999 This Plan recommended the establishment of a Stewardship Committee
20 STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE
21 Committee Size
The Stewardship Committee (The Committee) shall consist of fifteen to twenty (15 - 20)
voting members
22 Committee Members
2 2 1 The Committee should include one representative from the following
. ActiOn to Restore a Clean Humber (ARCH)
. FederatlOIl of Ontano Naturalists (FON)
. FIrst Nations
. Hike Ontario
. Klemburg Busltless Improvement AssociatlOn (BIA)
. Local Ratepayers Associations
. McMichael CanadHU1 A.1i Collectioil
. OntarIO Streams
. Vaughan Chanlber of Coi11lnerce
. West Humber NaturalIsts
. York RegiOn School Boards
v I!lN"ToR.wpd I llv{:"th.rl 00..' "'~n1
E45 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
2.2.2 The followmg representatIves are ex-officIO, non-votll1g members
. ChaIr, East Humber Subwatershed Comnllttee
. CIty of VaughaIl CouncIllor
. CIty of Vaughan staff
. MlillStry of Natural Resources
. Ontano Hentage FoundatIOn
. Toronto RegIOn ConservatIOn Authonty staff
. York RegIOn
. York RegIOn PolIce
2.2.3 The ChaIr may 1l1Vlte guests for specIfic tOpICS when this would 1l1crease the releVaIlt
ll1fOrmatIOn avaIlable and rmprove the declSlon malang.
2.3 Committee Chair
2.3 1 The ChaIr shall be elected by the members from aITIong then membershIp It IS
preferable that the Charr be chosen from the commumty at large. The appomtment shall
be for two years and the mcumbent shall be ehgible for re-electIOn for one addltlOnal
term.
2 3.2 The Vlce-Chan shall be elected by the members from among theIr memberslllP The
appomtment shall be for two years. The V ICe-ChaIr shall not be consIdered an
automatIc replacement for the ChaIr
24 Committee Meetings
24 I A quorum shall COnsISt of one tlmd of the memberslup
2 4.2 The Committee shall operate Wlti1lll tile Rules of Conduct of the TRCA. Ifnot otheIWIse
covered, Roberts Rules of Order shall be followed.
2 4,3 The Committee is not a fonnal commenting body of the TRCA Authonty staff WIll
advIse The Committee of Authority projects bemg planned or undertaken Wltlun the
property or watershed and of major plannmg ll1ltlatlves or projects of others where tlle
Autilonty may be a conullentmg or perrmttmg body
244 DecIsIOns shall be made on tEe baSIS of consensus as far as possible. If votmg IS
necessary, a sImple maJonty of members present shall CaITY the motIOn, provIded that
the Item was an agenda item. For items of New Busmess, a majority of tlle voting
memberslup shall be reqmred to pass the motIOn. The Chall' shall vote only m the case
of a he.
245 It IS expected that there will be at least one meetmg each qumier Meetmgs shall ollty
be scheduled when tllere IS sufficIent busmess to JUStIfy the meetmg. A meeting may be
V'\BN^ToR.wpd Updated 99-12-02
June 2, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E46
cancelled on the authonty of the Charr for cause, eg, a major snowstoID1. The date of
the next meetmg should be set at each meetmg, or at the call of the Charr
246 Members are expected tq attend meetmgs consistently Missmg more than two
consecutive meetmgs, or one-third of the meetIngs m any calendar year, Without a
reason acceptable to the ChaIT, shall be cause for reVIew, and possible tennmatlOn, of
that memberslllp
247 Members unable to attend a mee1:1.ng may appoint an alternative representatIve, With the
conCUlTence oftlle Charr Altel11atlves shall be bnefed and provided WIth the necessary
documents by the member The member should also debnefthe alternatIve member so
they remam current.
2.5 Reporting Relationship
The ChalI shall report on The Committee's actlvltJ.es to the TRCA PublIc Use AdVisory Board, with the
asslstallCe ofTRCA staff, as reqUlred, but at least once each year
26 Administrative Support
The TRCA Wlll provide adrmnistratlve support to aSSIst m the operatIon of The Committee and in the
ImplementatIOl1 oftherr projects, within the Im11ts oftherr resources
2.7 Subsidiary Groups
The Commirtee may establIsh SUbSldlal)' groups, such as subcormmttees or task forces, as necessary
to aSSIst With speclfic tasks, projects or programs. The Charr of such SubSidiary groups should be a
member of The Committee The SubSidiary group shall be automatICally dIsbanded when theil'
aSSignment has been completed and their actlvitles reported to The Committee
30 MANDATE
The Committee shall adVIse the TRCA concermng the management of these areas. They shall establIsh
alld Implement actJ.vitIes that are consistent With the goals and objectIves of the approved Boyd North
and Glassco Parle Management Plan. The areas of interest may mclude, but are not hmited to
to Fundralsing
.. CODmlUlllcations / EducatiOn
.. RestoratIon pians
.. Trail ptans '
.. ReconllnendatlOl1S fo1" updating the :Management Plan
Note See Clause 3 3 1 of the Boyd North and Glassco Park Management Plan for a more
comprehensive list of possible activities.
E47 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
RES.#E20/00 - 2000 CONSERVATION AREAS CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT
Proposed Projects. Approval of the proposed project list for 2000
Conservation Areas Capital Development.
Moved by. Maria Augimeri
Seconded by. Doug Dickerson
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the proposed project list for 2000
Conservation Areas Capital Development be approved,
THA T staff be Authorized to proceed with these projects subject to the approved level of
funding for this component of the Authority's 2000 Capital Budget;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized to take whatever action
is required in connection with these projects, including the execution of any documents
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
As part of the Authority's 2000 Capital Budget process, a list of proposed projects for the
Conservation Areas has been developed As in past years, these projects have been identified with
a view to meeting the need for.
- improving visitor service levels
- net revenue generation
- rejuvenation of basic infrastructure
RATIONALE
Improvement in the product we offer to our visitors is an important component in attracting and
maintaining our customer base Staff have identified priority projects using the criteria noted above
based on the anticipated funding level for 2000 The capital projects included, directly address
needs which have been identified by our visitors such as better washrooms and more picnic tables
In addition, the condition of basic infrastructure associated with our Conservation Areas, such as
roads and buildings, has deteriorated in recent years due to severe restrictions on funding Some
of the projects included, represent a step toward rejuvenation of this infrastructure The list also
includes funds to initiate concept and management plan development for a number of locations.
June 2 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E48
2000 CONSERVATION AREAS CAPITAL PROJECTS
Project Descnption Total estimated cost
1 Picnic Tables - all Areas 22,000
2 Claremont foot Bridges 35,000
3. Heart Lake Septic Bed 25,000
4 Boyd Washroom Renovations 20,000
5 Petticoat Creek Pool Deck 5,000
6 Indian Line Shower Building 76,000
7 Two toilets with water for Albion Hills Campground 60,000
8 Hydro upgrades at Indian Line Campground 25,000
9 Conservation Area Planning 32,000
TOTAL 300,000
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Capital Budget levels for 2000 have not been finalized precisely as a component of the budget relies
on utilization of reserves Expenditures may need to be reduced if revenues are significantly less
than expected The final project list will be adjusted according to the level of funding available
Report prepared by Susan O'Neil, extension 5298
For information contact. Brian Denney, extension 6290
Date May 18, 2000
RES.#E21 /00 - TOMMY THOMPSON PARK
Proposal for Web Cameras Staff have received a request to install up to 2
remotely operated web cameras at Tommy Thompson Park for the purpose
of generating live video images of birds and wildlife for a commercially based
nature web site
Moved by Frank Scarpitti ,
Seconded by Linda Pabst
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the request to install web cameras
at Tommy Thompson Park for the purpose of broadcasting live wildlife images to a web site
be approved on a two year trial basis,
E49 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
THA T staff be directed to work with the proponents and the Friends of the Spit to determine
the best location for the units and to prevent impact on the site,
AND FURTHER THAT staff in conjunction with The Friends of the Spit and the proponent,
undertake a six month, one year and twenty four month full review of the project.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The TRCA has been approached by a company regarding the opportunity to set up web cameras
at Tommy Thompson Park (Leslie Street Spit)
Alderley Ventures Inc (AVI) was founded in 1997 to create web sites and CD-ROMs that deal with
Important societal subjects and issues AVI specializes in developing multimedia on scientific,
cultural, educational and historical subjects working with Foundations, non-profit organizations and
NGO's Most of the projects A VI develops are either owned by A VI or are
Joint ventures A detailed curriculum vitae has been attached
Their proposal is to install remotely operated video cameras at Tommy Thompson Park for the
purposes of broadcasting live video images of nesting and migratory birds to a nature related web
site The site to be developed will be called "Viewnature com"
The proposed cameras will have limited user control opportunities from the web site itself in order
to allow the user to zoom, pan, and tilt the camera to view specific features or habitats
Web cameras can be used to
. show the public live webcast footage of Tommy Thompson Park and the wildlife that live
there
. assist researchers looking at wildlife features at Tommy Thompson Park by allowing them
to book private time to control the camera,
. enable the public to control the camera In 15 minute increments (booked time), and
. provide streaming video of live wildlife footage that can be viewed on a monitor while users
work, possibly With an optional audio loop of nature sounds,
Due to the image content (habitat, nature and wildlife) and the controllability of the cameras, it is
envisioned by the proponent that this site will be of interest to the general public and in particular
schools that could use the web site and cameras for classroom based demonstration and learning
opportunities Although the feed will not be regularly recorded (audio). facilities can be made
available upon request. This feature would permit live broadcast "documentary type" viewing with
a guide or host explaining the wildlife or feature from the site
-"
It is expected that the web site will contain the names and logos of sponsors and partners in the
project and in addition will provide hot links to other resource management/wildlife management
organizations including the TRCA.
Tommy Thompson Park has been identified as an excellent location to obtain up-close live video
images of wildlife speCies, particularly nesting and migratory birds There is also opportunities to
set up cameras In other locations throughout the GT A for the same purpose
June 2, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E50
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Once the necessary approvals are obtained, AVI will design, engineer and construct the camera
units, and develop the web site
The cameras will be installed on existing structures (i e hydro poles) at Tommy Thompson Park
following the 2000 nesting season (August) The cameras will be set-up in unobtrusive locations in
order to blend into the natural environment as much as possible and to avoid any impact on the site
itself AVI will work with TRCA staff and the Toronto Port Authority to finalize the camera locations
and coordinate the work on site
The tentative start up of the actual web site has been identified as September 5th, and will coincide
with the start of the major fall bird migration through the Park Due to the technical specifications
of the cameras, an operating season of March through November (during daylight hours only) is
envIsioned by AVI at thiS time
FUTURE BENEFIT
There are many potential benefits to the TRCA resulting from this project including but not limited
to
. opportunity to broadcast the Images directly on the TRCA's corporate website (i e virtual
tour of Tommy Thompson Park),
. identification and promotion of the TRCA as a local land steward and resource manager;
. opportunity to promote other TRCA programs/initiative (i e Conservation Journeys, The
Living City),
. opportunity to promote specific programs at Tommy Thompson Park (i e monitoring, habitat
creation, interim use and special events), and
. possibility of future revenue generation
It is expected that additional opportunities and benefits will be realized during the course of the
project.
There has been Interest expressed from other agencies related to potential benefits of having
remotely operated cameras at this waterfront location For example the Toronto Port Authority Works
Department has suggested there may be opportunities to use the cameras to monitor wave
conditions on the Lake and specifically at Tommy Thompson Park Weather instrumentation could
also be Installed at each webcam site
FINANCIAL DETAILS
All costs related to the project Will be borne by A VI, including the cost of the cameras themselves
and the development and operation of the web site A VI is also willing to assume all liability and
Insurance for the camefas'-end,.thejr1:tt:t'Emdant-on~site-eqtlipment. Dtle to.the expected benefits to
the Authority resulting from the web site and the use of the video images, the TRCA will not charge
A VI for the use of the Park for this project.
E51 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
TRCA will provide in-kind support to the project start up including the provision of on-site guidance
related to the installation of the units, technical support and information related to the resource
(image) Interpretation and Information to be used to support the live images on the web site TRCA
staff would also undertake periodic monitoring or inspection of the cameras themselves at the Park
dUring the course of other activities on site
The TRCA may consider providing limited funding towards a continuation of the project in the future
depending on the success of the project and any Park or corporate benefits that are realized AVI
has suggested that there may be future opportunities for revenue generation for the TRCA as a
result of interest in the web site Staff will continue to discuss these opportunities with the proponent
as the project develops
For information contact Scott Jarvie, extension 5312
Date May 17, 2000
Attachments (1)
June 2. 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E52
Attachment 1
1
AVI
Alderley Ventures Inc.
Introduction
Alderfey Ventures Inc. (A VI) was founded m 1997 to create web sites and CD-ROMs that deal
With Important SOCletaJ subjects and issues. A VI speCializes III developmg multlmedla on sClentJ.fic,
culturu.!, educatiOnal and hlstoncal subjects, for FoundatIOns non-profit orgamsatlOns and NGO s.
We believe that digital media s interactlvity is an important commUnicatiOn tool that can,
. Build VIrtUal communities that mainwn and Increase an organizatIOn's membershIp.
- Coovey orgawsalJons message to a wide audience(s) cost cffecuvely
. Jg an Integral part of an orgnnisatlOns overall cornmunicauons strategy
. Build stakeholder value by fostering two way commUniCatIons
. Deliver value to fundeTll.
. Help develop new funding sources.
. Fll{;llitate organisallons' bwldmg strategic allIances.
A VI works With Its chents In develuping multimedia projects based on the available resources and
ll$SISts, where necessary in obtaining the funding for a project. A VI does not develop corporate
web Sltes.
A VI develops web SILes that deal with complex subjects and seeks to promote
greater knowledge of thos~ subjects by.
· IdcnufYIUg the key Issues
· workIng WIth experts In the field
. making specialIZed knowledge easily extractable by users
. building knowledge enhancmg mleractlvlty as an mtegral functIOn of a web sIte
. making the site pan of the process of public or other stakeholder consultatiOns.
.-
Whenever poSSIble projects are developed in both t:'rench and l::ngllsh SImultaneously
A VI hll3 a bUSiness office and deSign studiO at separate locatJous 1Il Turonto.
A VI Inc.
1721-377 Rldelle Avenue. Toronto, Onlano M6B ] K2
Tel (416) 782-1410 Fax. 789-2612 Net; maxcom@llltcrlog.com
E53 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
2
Projects:
A VI' first project was "The Valour and Horror", www valourandhorror.com
Based on the controversial teleVISion senes, "The Valour and The Horror" site tells the story of the
Canadians and the Battle for Normandy In W W II Tllking advantage of the on-I me enVironment,
t.hJs sHe presents not only the views expressed In the television senes, but contrary views as well. It
mvolves users through its successful ongoing forums: the site IS the largest World War II on the
web, and averages 500 000+ ruts each month. II has become a major resource to secondary school
students.
"After Darwin" -www galafilm.comlafterdarwm is a web Site and CD-ROM project
that deals with the social impact of genetic manipulation In human cells. The project IS also a 2 x 1
hour teleVISIOn senes bem~ broadcast by Discovery TeleviSion "After
DarwlO" will be the world s largest and most comprehensl vc web SJte Oil genetIcs and
eugenics. As a mula-level site. il will appeal to the general publlc, slUdenrs m middle
school and universny, and to the user who already has a hIgh level of knowledge about various
aspects of these: subjects.
"The War of 1812. Bravery and Betrayal -www galafilm.coro/1812 is a web
Stte and CD-ROM proJect. It r.ells the story of the War of 1812 and the surrounding
rustonc penod. The web sile compliments the 4 x 1 br television series hemg hroadcast by History
TeleVIsIOn. The CD-I{OM IS bemg bundled with the Canadian EncyclopedIa dIStnbuted by
McClelland & Stewart.
"Road Stories for the l'lesb-Eatmg Future" -www gaJafilm.com/roadslories/ -
is based on ll1e work of Arthur 311d Mariloulse Kroker 0f1 C Theory aft Ofl-Ime magazine Road
Stones maps a world rapidly enmeshing itSelf in technology. WIthout thinking through the ethical
IInplicat10ns of tillS technological embrace. A web sIte and web cast was presented on-hne
simultaneously with a two-hour television special broadcast by CRe NewsWorld thiS September
Rotman Institute web sites The Rotman Institute of Raycrest Centre focuses its
research on the frontal lobes of the brain. The: Institute investigatcs memory and the
bram':s CJl.ccutJ.ve funcLJUn:s. ThIS lclUhng-cdgc work is bolh world class and nol Widely
dissenllll8ted.
The web sIte IS to enhance the transmiSSIon of key research and encourage a fTUltful
exchange of Ideas worldWide. In additIOn. the Rutman Inslltute IS sponsonng ~ world
class conference on the frontal lobes in March of 2000 The conference IS expected to
significantly mfluence the research agenda on the frontal lobes of the brain for me next five to ten
years A web sIte specifically dCcUcatcd to conference proceedmgs IS also belOg developed.
June 2 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E54
3
In Development:
"Voices 4 Children." - web site. VOices 4 Children IS a not-for-profit orgamzatlon whose ffilSSJon
15 to work WIth orgaruzations and lOdlvlctuals through leadership and educatIOn to strengthen public
comnutment to the healthy development of cluldren and youth.
Based on the concept of healthy development, VOices for Children provIdes programs and
mfonnarion deSigned to promote Ideal envIronments for children, from pre-natal care to 18 years of
age. F...ducatlonal program's and materials provide parents and caregivers With an underslandmg of
what children need to become healthy, responsible and canng adults. The role of fathers and the
SpeClaJ needs of childreo with leanllng dlsabdltJes are dIscussed as well.
VOices for Children promotes insights into careglving for children, and then puts those InSights Into
actions.
Owl Bu<>ks - A VI is develuping Cl web sile with OWL Books 10 <IppeCll1o kids IS lhat encourages
participatIon in interesting, learning onented activities, and prr)V]de detailed instruction m how to
carry these acbVloes out.
Our key concern IS I.u ueSlgn the product so that 1l fills the clIenl's m:eds. To succeed, a web slle
must reach Its intended audience(s). ThIs means the sIte must have the requIred mfonnatlon,
potential users must know it exists, and they must find value in using it. Continually enhanclOg
this usability value is an essential part of a site's maintenance and ultImate success.
Site Maintenance. A VI clther maintainS the web sites 1t develops on behalf of the chent or
develops a slle so that the client call easdy mamlam and ex.pand the site themselves.
PriDclpalAI
Ma;um Engel has been lOvolvc::d HI the medll1ll1dustry fur over twenly years llS an
Executive Producer Producer s Agent, Dlsrnbutor, and Executive Content Producer for
multImedia. He has produced over thirty documeutanes aIll! bceulllstrumenlalm m;my dramas.
Among them are:
. "The Nightmare Years" 8 x I hours, for Turner and TFl France
. 'The 444 Days of Iran" 2 x 2 hours, for TNT, USA, and Antenne 2, France
. "Dust and Blood" 2 X 2 hours for ZDF, Germany, Ant~nne 2, Franc_~_and RTVE, _ .--
S pam.
These programs won over thirty-two international awards.
--- ----- ------
E55 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00
June 2, 2000
4
Maxim founded the first Canadian mternational teleVISIOn program d]stnbullon
company. Tclevcntures Program Management Among the many programs it dlstn buted, the
company sold "The Lltl.lest Hobo to over 108 countnC$, aud "Science InternatIOnal" 10 over 89 A
special European version was coproduced willi Thames Television UK.
Max1m's most recent teleVIsion production was "The Fifties," a Six-part senes based on
David Halberstam's best selling book. TIllS production is now being broadcast by The
Discovery Channel, USA and History Television, Canada.
He was Executive Producer for "The Valour Slid The Horror" web:ulc
www valourandhorror.com. He IS the busmess affairs producer on Ihe "War of 1812" and" After
Darwm", "Road Stones for the Flesh-Eating Future and" Rotman Research Institute" web SItes
and CD-ROMs,
MWID IS the ExecutIve Vice-PresIdent of IMPAC, InteractIVe Multlmed]a Producers
ASSOClatlon of Canada, and also a member of APMQ, Quebec and a founder of the Interactl ve
DIgItal Content Group, Ontano.
Alan .t-lorence has worked in informatIOn modelmg. lUterface desIgn mulumedia,
hypertext and data processmg SlDce 1980 His profeSSIonal rolcs mclude E.ducator and
Consultant 10 Development Methodology, Project Leadcr Interface Designer, Database
AdminislnltOr, SysteIDS Analyst, and Programmer Analyst.
Alan was the Creative Director for "The Vlilour and The Horror" web site
www valourandhorror.com. He has designed and programmed a number of CD-ROMs Includmg'
. Gems of Darkness
. My City/sponsored by UNICEF
. A Guide to Bass FishlOg
. lee Age: Tho Hi:>tory of Hockey
. Viewz: A Digital Magnrine
. War of 1812
. After Darwm
He has also developed a number of corporate web SIteS.
Currently, Alan]s worlang as Creative Director on thc "War uf 1812" and "After
DarwlO" web sites and CD-ROMg.
Alan IS a 10ng-l1mc'praclltioner-of.zen. having-spent sev.en~ycars. W.1Lh.KCllnctt ~oshJ m the
sevenues, and he currently practices with Harada Roshi Alan also tca(;hc~ yoga and meditatIon,
and IS trained as a therapist at the Transpersonal Therapy Ccntre In Toronto.
A VI Inc.
June 2 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E56
RES.#E22/00 - KORTRIGHT WORKSHOPS
Expanded Workshop Program at Kortright
Moved by Maria Augimeri
Seconded by Doug Dickerson
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to continue the
workshop program at Kortright with particular emphasis on expanding the solar and wind
energy workshops CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Kortright Centre is a natural oasis located on 324 hectares of pristine woodlands along the Humber
River Valley, just ten minutes north of Toronto With approximately 130,000 visitors, annually, and
over 90 environmental programs for schools and public groups, the Kortright Centre is the leading
environmental education centre in Canada. Kortright Centre is owned and operated by the Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority, a provincial/municipal partnership established to manage the
renewable natural resources of the region's watersheds
Kortnght's mission is to promote the wise and appropriate use of renewable natural resources
through engaging educational programs
RATIONALE
Kortnght s visitors represent a wide array of cultural and socio-economic backgrounds, academic
levels, ages, and interests To accommodate this diverse customer base Kortright designs
programs which appeal to most groups through, hikes, exhibits, demonstrations, special events,
seminars and workshops From families and individuals interested in unguided and guided hikes
to the enthusiast interested in highly specialized topics Kortright tries to provide something for
everyone
Ten years ago Kortright's energy program identified an opportunity to develop programs that
provided more information than it was currently offering through its guided hikes Acting on
customer requests, lack of market availability, and the existing site demonstrations and talent,
Kortright developed Canada's first solar and wind energy workshops targeted for the general public
Since that time Kortright has developed a series of workshops based on a variety of
internal expertise They include Photography, Maple Syrup Making, Bee Keeping, Nature
Storytelling, and Wildlife habitat. However, our most successful workshops continue to be our solar
and Wind energy workshops Starting off as a general 3 hr introduction to solar and wind energy,
offered twice a year, the workshops have grown into 3 levels (introduction, intermediate and
advanced) ranging from 4 to 8 hours/day and offered over 15 times per year These workshops
begin at $45 and gG"l:Ji3-t-G.$l60.,-geA-ef.atifl~'~r-$.14;-0GO/year--afld-r-epresentjng three quarters of
all workshop revenues
Looking at the chart below you can see why workshops are a success With only 005% of the
attendance the workshops generated 9% of revenues. Although Kortright seeks to increase all areas
we believe there is still tremendous potential for growth in workshops
E57 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
Activities Attendance % of Total Revenue % of Total
Public Weekends 13,820 00 2900 $ 35,302 00 17 00
Special Events 29,907 00 6200 $ 91,782 00 4300
Corporate 1,54700 300 $ 48,858 00 23.00
Weddings 1,07800 200 $ 6,734 00 300
Evenings 1,238 00 300 $ 10,465 00 500
Workshops 257 00 0005 $ 17,88500 900
Total 47,84700 1 00 00 $ 211,02600 1 00 00
FUTURE BENEFITS
With the success of our energy workshops Kortright is seeking to increase the number of offerings
over the next year With growing interest in green energy (solar and wind), new markets opening
up, and electrical deregulation commencing in November there are many groups who would benefit
by a workshop at Kortright. We are currently pursuing
Electrical Inspectors
Municipal Electrical Utilities
Provincial Parks
Conservation Authorities
Camps
Teachers
Women workshops
'vVind energy level 2 and 3
Summary
Workshops have become an excellent source of revenue for Kortright, however the real benefit has
been the heightened profile of Kortright's reputation as a leader in environmental education, as well
as improving our opportunities for corporate partnerships Other organizations, such as Boards of
Education, the YMCA, NGO's, Government agencies, private companies and colleges now either
seek our advice or regularly send their staff to our workshops. With some of these organizations
hopIng to duplicate our success we need to be creative and progressive if we wish to maintain our
leadership role
Understanding the need to grow and building on this success Kortright will be investigating new
workshop opportunities With our shift to demonstrating and pror1]otiD..9 sustainable technology and
lifestyles we believe this will provide a whole gambit of workshop opportunities in the immediate and
distant future
For information contact Alex Waters, 905-832-2289, extension 240
Date May 24, 2000
June 2, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E58
RES.#E23/00 - REFORESTATION FOR BIODIVERSITY PROGRAM
Announcing the first industry partnership for the TRCA and Conservation
Foundation Reforestation for Biodiversity Program with Ontario Power
Generation (OPG)
Moved by Maria Augimeri
Seconded by Doug Dickerson
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Conservation Foundation be
encouraged to develop the Reforestation for Biodiversity program further and to seek
additional partners CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Partnership opportunities With industry exist for reforestation and tree planting to achieve
atmospheric carbon sequestration and regional biodiversity OPG will provide the Conservation
Foundation and TRCA With $500,000 to initially plant 200,000 trees (Fall 2000 and Spring 2001) in
the Greater Toronto Area on TRCA managed lands at three locations identified for important
biodiversity values Glen Haffy CA, Lake 8t. George CA, and Glen Major CA.
RATIONALE
Reforestation in Toronto and Region continues to be a major environmental strategy for the
Conservation Authority and many of its municipal and community partners Forest canopy targets
are difficult to reach due to the daily net decline of forest cover in the region
International concerns regarding the effects of climate change from carbon emissions have
positioned tree planting as an effective strategy for sequestering carbon from the atmosphere Many
Industry and corporate leaders are choosing forest protection and tree planting as a "carbon offset"
strategy to demonstrate leadership which compensates the environment for emissions, and invests
In strategies for carbon emissions reductions
"The terrestrial biosphere is a large store of carbon About one-third of the carbon is stored in living
plant biomass (trees, shrubs, etc ) and the remaining two-thirds is in soil as the residuals of plant
decomposition and minerals Small changes in the biosphere reservoir can have tremendous effect
on the concentration of CO2 In the atmosphere At present, about 20% of the anthropogenic CO2
emiSSions to the atmosphere come from deforestation and other land use changes [The remainder
comes from the burning of fossil fuels]
Forested ecosystems sequester carbon through the annual increment in growth in their woody
biomass, plus the proportion of litter fall that becomes incorporated into the soil carbon pool When
trees are first planted, a large proportion of the annual exchange of CO2 goes into growing plant
biomass. The "age-atwhich trees-reach-matority-cliffers-greatly "among-species and climatic regions,
but the larges component of carbon sequestration occurs during the first 60 to 100 years.
Calculations suggest that the "average" Canadian tree will sequester about 200 kg C over an
80-year period in an urban environment, and 225 kg C in a rural environment. On an annual basis,
this is equivalent to storage of 2.5 kg C yr 1 in an urban environment and 2 8 kg C yr 1 in a rural one"
(Roulet and Freedman, Tree Canada Foundation, 1999 )
E59 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 June 2, 2000
Objectives of the TRCA and Conservation Foundation Reforestation for Biodiversity Program
0 Fully managed and monitored biodiversity and carbon sequestration program for corporate
partners seeking environmentally comprehensive carbon offset initiatives
0 Species-appropriate planting and reforestation of environmentally important land (40,000
acres) publicly owned, managed and permanently protected by The Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority
0 Species-appropriate planting, reforestation and partnership protection of privately owned
lands deemed significant within the regional Greater Toronto Area biodiversity framework
presently being designed by The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
0 Regional natural heritage planning and protection through a regional science-based
identification, mapping and monitoring system
. Regional biodiversity through conservation and protection
. Regional ecosystem health through regeneration of degraded areas and establishment of
green cOrridors
. Establishment of plant and animal habitat.
. Public education and participation
0 Recognition/promotion of our corporate partners
. Build regional capacity for seed collection, cultivation and protection of the local native plant
gene pool
For information contact Tim Feher, 416-667-6291
Date June 1, 2000
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
RES.#E24/00
Moved by 'Olck O'Brien
Seconded by Doug Dickerson
THA T the Committee move into closed session CARRIED
June 2 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/00 E60
ARISE FROM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
RES.#E25/00
Moved by Maria Augimeri
Seconded by Frank Scarpittl
THA T the committee arise and report from closed session CARRIED
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12 06 pm, on June 2,2000
Donna Patterson Craig Mather
Chair Secretary Treasurer
/ks
~
, THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE PUBLIC USE ADVISORY COMMITTEE #4/00
Friday, July 7, 2000 Page E61
The Public Use Advisory Committee Meeting #4/00, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office,
on Friday, July 7, 2000 The Chair, Donna Patterson, called the meeting to order at 11 01 a.m
PRESENT
John Adams Member
Maria Augimeri Member
Dick O'Brien Chair, Authority
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
Linda Pabst Member
Donna Patterson Chair
Frank Scarpitti Member
REGRETS
Michael Di Biase Member
Doug Dickerson Vice Chair
RES.#E26/00 - MINUTES
Moved by John Adams
Seconded by Maria Augimeri
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/00, held on June 2,2000, be approved CARRIED
CORRESPONDENCE
(a) A letter dated July 7, 2000 from Rocco Compagnone, requesting a deferral of Item 7 1 _
Proposed Bergeron Exotic Animal Sanctuary
RES #E27 100 - CORRESPONDENCE
Moved by Dick O'Brien
Seconded by Maria Augimeri
THAT the above-noted cgrrespondence (a) be received CARRIED
E62 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7 2000
PresentatIOn to the Land Use CommIttee
ConservatlOl1 Authonty
July 7, 2000
Rocco Compagnone
Askmg for an adjOUnU11ent of tIllS DeputatlOn as we are not 111 posseSSlOn of all techlllcal
data.
Staff Report
In lIght of the negatIve recol11l11endatlOl1 of Staff Report, we WIll reqUlre our own
consultant to reply to staff repOli.
Staff report receIved only yesterday October regularly scheduled meet111g should gIVe us
ample opportwlity to prepare detailed reply
We wIsh to have the oppOliwlIty to have further mput wIth staff, wIth a VIew to obtal111l1g
A j0111t repOli, acceptable to both paliIes.
Ammal Sanctuary/Pettmg Zoo proposal does not reqUIre all 50 acres/merely 20% more or
less, 1 e 10-12 acres and tIllS could be located on hl~her grounds 0 the facilIty The
majonty of the land would retall1its conservancy features because the public would not
have dIrect access to the
grazll1g, and other Sheltenng facilItIes, because the conceSSIons would be on the hIgher
grounds
We have no ObjectIOn to Staff RepOli bell1g filed, and an adjomnrnent granted
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E63
PRESENTATIONS
(a) Presentation by Miriam Mittermaier of 81 Kendleton Drive, on Item 7 4 - Claireville Natural
Area Enhancement Plan
(b) Presentation by Marty Brent, Manager, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on the status of the
restoration project.
RES #E28/00- PRESENTATIONS
Moved by Linda Pabst
Seconded by Maria Augimeri
THA T the above-noted presentations (a) and (b) be heard and received CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#E29/00 - PROPOSED BERGERON EXOTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY
City of Vaughan Receipt of a request to lease Authority lands within the
City of Vaughan to accommodate the relocation of the Bergeron Exotic
Animal Sanctuary
Moved by Dick O'Brien
Seconded by Maria Augimeri
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the proposal for Bergeron Exotic
Animal Sanctuary be deferred to a future Public Use Advisory Board Meeting CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority is in receipt of a request from Rocco Compagnone, Associate Broker with Royal
LePage Realty Services, acting as agent on behalf of the Bergeron Exotic Animal Sanctuary,
regarding a proposal to lease Authority lands in the City of Vaughan to accommodate the
relocation of this facility from its current location in the Town of Picton, Prince Edward County A
copy of the letter dated June 12, 2000 is attached
It is staff's understanding the Bergeron Exotic Animal Sanctuary wishes to relocate from their
current location in Picton to a larger site in the City of Vaughan, which will provide increased
visibility and access to the Toronto market. While not Indicated in the letter, the proponent would
require between 20 to 50 acres of land to accommodate their relocation The proponent has
advised this project would be considered a suitable "Millenium 2000" project, enabling the City of
Vaughan, the Authority and other corporate and private groups the ability to participate
I
E64 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
The proponent has advised that the Bergeron Exotic Animal Sanctuary will be a revenue providing
venture attracting 1 million visitors annually, and will offer opportunities to educate the general
public regarding the conservation and pr~servation of animals and conservation lands alike
The existing facility in Picton was opened in 1994, and contains 36 species and 150 animals in
total, for the most part non-native The current operation is seasonal, opening daily from March
break through to October 31 st., and on week-ends thereafter (weather permitting) The current
site in Picton is approximately 15 acres in size, approximately 25,000 school children attend the
facility annually
The proponent anticipates spending $2,500,000 towards the capital cost of relocating their facility
from Picton to the City of Vaughan, and have expressed an interest in entering into a long-term
lease arrangement for Authority lands in the City of Vaughan
RATIONALE
Premised on the general requirements provided by the Bergeron Exotic Animal Sanctuary,
Authority staff has advised the proponent that there are no lands currently available for lease within
the City of Vaughan that would meet their requirements (ie contiguous 20 to 50 acre parcel of
table land)
Additionally, it is staff's opinion that the proposed use of Authority lands for the purpose of an
exotic animal sanctuary IS not compatible with the mandate of the Authority
CONCLUSION
The Bergeron Exotic Animal Sanctuary should be advised there are no lands currently available
for lease in the City of Vaughan which would suit this use
Report Prepared By Luch Ognibene, extension 5284
Date June 26, 2000
Attachments (3)
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E65
Attachment 1 .
!
m 11I11I111111 " 111I
0 ROYAL ILEPAGE
June 12, 2000 111I1111111111I111I111
Your Community Realty
9050 Yonge Street, SUItl 100
Richmond Hill, OntarIO
L4C 986
Mr Luch Ognibene Tel (905). 731-2000
Lease: Development Agent Fax. (905) 886-7556
Toronto RegIon ConservatIOn Authonty
5 Shoreham Dnve
DownSVlew, OntarIo
.1\13N ISA
Dear Mr Ogmbene
Re Proposed Bergeron Exotlc AnImal Sancruary
Authonty Lands for Lease - Vaughan
Furtt.er to your letter dated June 7&1, 2000 we are pleased to mtroduce our
specIal use for your ConservatIOn Lands
The Bergeron ExotIc An1ll1a1 Sanctuary IS presently located along HIghw lY
49 (1\1arysvilk Road) near the Town OfPlctOD, Pnnce Edward County. Ii IS
our lJ1tentlOn to relocate the Sanctuary to a larger SIte WIth hIgher vlsibll1ty
and a.ccess to the largest populahon 111 Gntano, namely, Greater
l\1etrl:)pohtan Toronto
Tl1e Bergeron EXOTIC Arumal Sanctuary IS compnsed of a new aTllmal
i;anctuary that will be deslgned and conshucted m accordance wlth the
Amencan AS~:OClatlOn of Zoos and Aquanums (ie AAZA) Our new
10cat'lOn also wlshes to become a lIcensed member of CAZA establIshed 10
prom.ote the welfare of and encourage the advancement and Impl'OVemen1 of
ZOolog.Ical RecreatlOn., Educahon, Conservanon, and SCIence
'We conSIder tills project as a "MIllemLlm 2000" Programme for the
Cons ervatlOn Authonty, the Clty of Vaughan, and any other corporatlon or
pTlvate groups wIshmg to partICIpate The Sanctuary WIll be a revenue
prov) dmg venture and offer other publIc opportumtIes such as EducatlOn,
CODS ervatlon and PreservatlOl1 of the anImals and Conservation lands aliI e
E66 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
-
VV ..1._ ...,..., ~,...-. ........ - .. -- - -
i
!
'We would apprecIate your co-operatlOn ill taklllg thlS proposal to the
iCons.ervatlOll Land Plannmg Group for conslderatlOTI
Kmdly let us Imow If you reqUITe any further mformanon.
Yours truly,
Roya.l LePage: - Your Commumty Realty
~~~
ASSOc.late Broker
ec Eugene Fera, Plannmg
CIty ofYaughan Planmng Dept.
MIchael DIBIase
RegIonal Counsellor
CIty of Vaughan
PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E67
July 7, 2000
Attachment 2
JUN-UO-UU nUN JU,~i Ut.n riM' ~ U ~) It F Ai<' NO, S05BG3864J P.01
Ontario Society tOt' the Pl'$vention of Cruelty to Animals
"rl!;:.~r"/r:": '.'t.~ 1:\~::,1,. t,,,.~ur;Lt'./!JI.. "lw:La SfJ':r;;9104t1 RJU;Ou}
160-10 YOIl:i=- ~trt~~t. \('wm:,r'f.et, Ont.uno L31: 4V8
fd. (~l();,) H~~ 7122 1410) '21'-7105 FI'lX (905) 853.8643
""''',II..asp:;" un "t(
Prorecring anJfrsa!$ Sinr;e 78'13
5 June: 20Cl!1
Mr J Bert.{eron
Bergeron's ExotIC AllJft':,tJ ~a:~',.Lu(1r;
R.R, -# 1
PIcton ON KOK 2TO ~y ,~~?C 1-0JJ-1B)-:1~12 -
Dear IvIr H~~rgelUll.
I would like to than!.. VO!1 fi)f ;1!(W'1I1~ b~pi;';r:tclr '\~[a}Jorv to c.onduc.t the annual inspectIOn
of your facility earhe:r thts 'I t:<L.
l'm pleased to see thallnspeclOI hl,,-Ilorv dId nut tinJ any problems anti all animal
enclosures appe.ar to exceeci rhc numtr1um StaIlc:1.rd~"
We have alwavs el~oyed a good viocbJlg rei::-.trotl$hip vl1th you and your \.Ylfe and 1'111
sure that we Wlll conrtJ1ue tco mt1mt8n that s)Jmt 0/ CQopenmon in our mutual concern of
animal walfHfe
As usual, all of your animals appear to be in good physical condlt1on. You continue to
provlae the legal requirement~, l.1t $l.llt:.tbb ~wd ad.eql.J:Jte tood, water, shelter and care, for
your arumals, Howe:v.;:r 1 would like to Cn(:(Jl.liaf~; yell to eA-plore the optIons a.nd
Implement plflns ror mc:roascd l.;u"v1ronmcmal cnnduncnt tor 311 of yOur ammals.
There are many publwatIOns ClI,'<ul~l)l~ to asS!st WI) o\vne.rs/op~ra!Or5 Mth enrichment
optIons 1 recommend tht: b,)i)k Ye ond Natil!'l?; 'JJn'tmnmenta! J::nrichmenf lor CCtptrvc~
Animals'" as well as '7he ShapiJ O(Ll2f'lchmeni a publicanon from the U S
(www GTI\1chment.org~
I understand that you have pi::1.n~ tN rurLlfc c]\pln.slOn I \vQuld be grateful If you would
include the Ontario Sr>(,A iD. t11c development M1.ho~e plans.
Swccrd'h /",.
'/' ,,--: i' f /
/' ,.'/ ,//.
t" ',J ,
t;/:/"~ fC-' ,,-; .~"./? ,/ '
. /,/7 1ft ;:-. ~ /' /'
" '( '., j",
-:,. \, (-,,"" .....
H{Hugh) Codhll1, 'SeDmr ,lmfJe0[~r
Manager of Inspection Ser'/l\.,~.;
Ce' Inspecror Connj~ ~Vl.111ory \bjlanee
. -
---.-'---.. --._- -
:t> m
{JII/J if we IIl11lerstw,,/, can "'e care. ware the curving tusks! - OJ
- co
aniI' if II'" car/' lI'i1II1'1! ""'1' - - This remarkable zoo had a serendipitou, ~
(Jnly if II'e "elf' .rllllll all be SUI'{:d. "
- beginning. A few years ago lhf :T
Jane Goodall Bergerons dt:cided Ihey wanled a hou~( 3
~
pel. Not just any pcl-a cougar How It)
oy Lola RCld Allin ever il seemed Ihe cougar had Olher idea! ::J
Arc you and your children ddighled to -
and wasn t very adaptable 10 lhe rigou~ W
karn ahoul wild animals pn:sented oy rd- of dorneslicily Soon. the Bergerons were
c\<l''lion prouucllons such iJS Kralt.J offt:rt:d olher cougars. And lions. And li-
KII:utllres'! Do you onen wish you could gers-lolS of ligers-which otht:rwise
\"Sil lhe TOfOI1lo Zoo mDrc oflen but are would have been killed a.~ excess slock by
deterred by the prospect of Ira veiling a 10- lhe zoos where Ihey lived. And Iwo aging
1:11 IIf four hours in a vehick from Ihe capybaras, cagle owls (Dubo bubo. a first
Quin": Rt:gion III spend only a few hours cousin to the Nonh American greal
i11lhe wo" Or perhaps you and your fam- homed owl; B. l'irginianus), guinea pigs.
Ily have nt:ver visiletllhe Toronlo Zoo, red and silver foxes. one first-general ion
th\\'aned nol only by Ihe long drive bUI Bengal cat, and a while fox! Large enclo-
al~o by lhe price of admission. Would sores suitable for each individuallype of LJ
C
you enjoy being closer 10 our non-human animal are construcled in response to Ihe ill
friends in a more relaxed, less crowded increasing size of their menagerie. com- e
environment? BUl, perhaps you object to prised moslly of animals considered ex- 0
the concepr of any animal held captive cess by NOf1h American zoos, or animals C
behind a wire cage. Have you ever won- unwanled or rejected by zoos or individu- (fJ
m
dered whal happens 10 excess" exotic als who realized !hat !hey couldn', cope )>
animals'! Have you pondered the fate of .. with Ihe very pets that Ihey had once 0
mOSI eXOlic animals whose ownerS de- wanled! Wi!hoot the compassion of peo- :=:;
clded they were not able or did not want many exotic animals including serval calS, !he chaus (pro- wildcats crunch happily After this-only pIe like !he Bergerons, !he development (f)
0
to care for their pelS anymore? nounced shosh) also known as the 1unglecu- !Tom Eurasia, the one of many daily meals generously pro- and continued support of individual visi- JJ
If you ve answeren yes 10 any of these caracallynx, lhe a1nur Leopard (with a coat colour similar to the vided (0 maintain the vigorous health of tors and membeto as well as the .upport -<
questions. ga!her lhe children into your endangered snow leopard). one spOiled jaguar and Iwo rare !he wild cats--lislen closely 10 !he coo. of one local food marlcet which donales ill
vehicle--<lr go by YOllTSelf--and drive 25 melanistic (ebony with shimmering black spots) jaguars, and six gars: you might be able 10 hear them fruits, meat, and bones, Lhese animah 0
)>
minules southeast of Belleville to Siberian ligers, nearly eXlinct in the wild. Localed four leilome- purrrrr The cougar is the only wildcat would have been slaughtered I JJ
Bergeron s Saneluary also known as lhe \res north of Picton adjacenllO the Bergeron s large 19th-cen- able 10 vocalize like its domestic cousin. What oLher animals will I ~7 0
Prince Edward Exotic Animal Sancniary IUry residence, a large wooden sign near th,: county road adver- Passing the ligers lair, watch as they sue- Black bear, wolves, meerkalS, parrots, *
-i'o
Operaled by Pat and Joe Bergeron. Ihis tises the sanctuary cumb to an aflemoon siesla, draping their Molluccan cockalOO --....
0
enchanting enclave is dedicaled 10 ensur- If you re nOI inlriguen yet, lhere's more! 1\5 peafowl Strul m~- bodies over the large tree trunks in their HOlml of operarion are: Sununer 10 a.m. 0
ing the quality of life for exotic animals in jestically beside you, stroll along the meandering grassy traik compound. \heir alertness quelled by the 10 6 p.m.. Fall' 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., Winler
captivity Pal. Joe, and their assislanls Observe lhe king of Ihe jungle snoring peacefully on his back, afternoon snack weekends and Christmas vacalion _
provide shelter nourishmenl. and love for all four legs drooping languidly against its lorso. Be charmec: by Protected from curious visilors by two weather permiUing: II B.m_ to 3 p.m.,
Ihe obvious affeclion shared by Ihe male and female brow.r: Ie chainlink fences spaced six 10 eight feel school tours by prior arrangement I For
mur cuddling together on one of l"eir apan, the wildcalS are sheltered in habi- more call (613)476-4212.
many folialed lree brunches. tats congruent with their natllfill environs: iB
Chuckle alllle awkward antics of the ju- a dark, jungle-like canopy enshrouds Ihe . 1 . tJO. 't et~
venile ring-tailed lemur as the (iny loddler jaguars, \he chaus cat. \he serval, and Ihe .r< 0 .~ ~
learns to leap from branch 10 branch in- caracallynx whereas the lions and tigers .
side the large enclosure shared wi!h lhe are able 10 recline upon giant tree Slumps 162?~" ~
parents, Dixie and Dexter Cued by lhe and trunks in the savanna. The agile and 'iJ6'iij' Q
powerful cougar, able 10 leap more than '.....rui
lhroaty roar of the jaguars when .he .~
caregivers arrive Wilh pails and pails 20 feet inlo lhe air, is relained by a . . - n"l tY.: L
c
brimming with meat and bones. shiver as quonsel-hul chain Iinle fence! Get a From.. -
your sl'ine lingles when Ihe hungry cou- charge from Ihe wild boar as he races to- "Wi'i;J<<i: . _-..J
gars howl, anxious fOllheird"ily snack at ward you through his slough. hoofs toss- ~'>-'''' ":'" f\)
:',-l'!!l,;;-- ...nIiJ1 '
T p.m. During the summer months. Rob ing globs of mud. Standing only IWO Or ..at lli:f.~' 0
0
Kellough, the BiologistlZoologist and Di- three feet distant from the wild boar cou- .jiti?{Co' OW)""''',- . '. - 0
rector of Outreach Progrums, presents a pie, visitors are almost able 10 touch !he ii~fuU~W~';' ..
.:-' -~-;.t' "-..', ""Ii .
fascinating anu infumlalive lecture as the spiky hairs covenng their lough hide. Be- r:U::, ~~~i~iY~W'~~wFM.!
----
July 7 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E69
RES.#E30/00 - CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE
Endorsement of Terms of Reference To endorse the Clalreville
Conservation Area Stewardship Committee Terms of Reference
Moved by Maria Augimeri
Seconded by Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Claireville Conservation Area
Stewardship Committee Terms of Reference, dated June 2000, as appended, be endorsed,
THAT staff be authorized to support the Claireville Conservation Area Stewardship
Committee by providing technical expertise and administrative support,
AND FURTHER THATthe Chair ofthe Claireville Conservation Area Stewardship Committee
report on the Committee's activities, to the TRCA Public Use Advisory Board, with the
assistance of TRCA staff, as required, at least once each year CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority completed a comprehensive management plan
for the Claireville Conservation Area in 1997 The plan includes a description and evaluation of the
landscape features, constraints and opportunities which exist within the Claireville Conservation
Area. Specific recommendations are provided to direct environmental protection and restoration
as well as appropnate public use
The preparation of the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan was guided by a technical
advisory committee whic!-' included members of the public, community groups, municipal staff,
elected representatives, Chair of TRCA and Authority staff
The Authority, at its meeting held on April 4, i 997, adopted the following resolution
"THA T staff be directed to assist in the establishment of a Claireville Conservation
Area Advisory Committee made up of interested citizens, groups and organizations,
to continue to help the Authority in developing a vision for the Claireville
Conservation Area and the planning management and implementation of the
Management Plan, specific to those lands remaining in Authority ownership for open
space and public use purposes"
Specific responsibilities of the Claireville Conservation Area Stewardship Committee will be as
follows
(a) Assist with the development and implementation of specific environmental, heritage and
public use activities within the Claireville Conservation Area.
(b) Encourage and support the work of other local residents, groups, businesses and
agencies to implement the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan
(c) Promote and assist with the establishment of partnerships
E70 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
(d) Foster communication and education on Claireville Conservation Area initiatives
(e) Assist in obtaining financial and in-kind support
(f) Assist with monitoring activities
(g) Provide advice to TRCA regarding public uses within the Claireville Conservation Area.
(h) Review the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan periodically and assist with
revisions, when required
(I) Adhere to the management principles as defined in the Clalreville Conservation Area
Management Plan
The Stewardship Committee will consist of a maximum of 35 members, Including watershed
residents, community groups, businesses, agency staff and elected representatives Membership
will be reviewed at least once annually to ensure the full complement of members is maintained
A Selection Committee will be established to fill membership vacancies which may occur over the
course of the two-year term of the Stewardship Committee
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Staff will attend Stewardship Committee meetings, provide technical expertise and administrative
support for the Committee
The Stewardship Committee Chair will report on the Committee's activities, to the TRCA Public Use
Advisory Board, with the assistance of TRCA staff at least once each year
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Assistance from staff wili be funded from existing TRCA Humber Watershed budgets External
funding sources will be sought to support the projects of the Committee
For information contact Gary Wilkins, extension 5211
Date June 22, 2000
Attachments (1)
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E7i
Attachment 1
TERMS OF REFERENCE
CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE
June, 2000
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
E72 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
TERMS OF REFERENCE
CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Mission Statement for the Authority states that with one-third of Ontario's population within
its area of jurisdiction, thE, Authority acts in the community's interest through advocating and
implementing watershed management programs that
. maintain and improve the quality of the region's lands and waters,
. contribute to public safety from flooding and erosion,
. provide for the acquisition of conservation and hazard lands, and
. enhance the quality and variety of life in the community by using its lands for
interregional outdoor education, heritage preservation and conservation education
Planning efforts have shown that special interest and community groups have grown more
concerned with the impact of land use change on the remaining natural landscapes At the
same time, user groups, businesses and municipalities have expressed a growing interest in
uSing public lands for a variety of outdoor recreation, ecological restoration and other uses
The provision of publiC uses on TRCA land must consider economic factors, the needs of the
community and the needs of the natural landscape to ensure it is protected and managed
properly
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority completed a comprehensive management
plan for the Claireville COi lservation Area in 1997 The Plan includes a o2scriptlon and
evaluation of the landscape features, constraints and opportunities The Plan sets out specific
management zones whit. I dictate the type oT activity that is permitted For example, within a
Natural Environment Zone, stream rehabilitation, wetland creation, and forest establishment
may occur Within a Public Use Zone, passive recreation may occur based on proper site
specific plans
The Management Plan provides a framework for determining the ecological appropriateness of
any proposed public use to ensure the environmental integrity and diversity of the area are
maintained Protecting and restoring the form and function of the environmental features of the
property is paramount
The preparation of the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan was guided by a
technical advisory committee which Included members of the public, community groups,
municipal staff, elected representatives, Chair of TRCA and Authority staff
When the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan was adopted by the Authority on
April 4, 1997, resolution #46/97 stated, in part
JulV 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E73
"THA T staff be directed to assist in the establishment of a Claireville Conservation Area
Advisory Committee made up of interested citizens, groups and organizations) to
continue to help the Authority in developing a vision for the Claireville ConservatIon Area
and the planning, management and implementation of the Management Plan, specific to
those lands remaining in Authority ownership for open space and public use purposes"
20 STUDY AREA
The Clalreville Conservation Area is located in the Cities of Brampton and Toronto, in the
Humber River Watershed Figure 1 illustrates the entire Claireville Conservation Area complex
Figure 2 puts the Claireville Conservation Area into a regional context. The site is
approximately 2,100 acres (848 hectares) in size The area extends approximately seven
kilometres in a northwest direction from Finch Avenue and Highway 427, and varies from 0 8 to
two kilometres in width Many transportation corridors exist making the area very accessible
Some of the major corridors include Highway 427, Highway 50, Highwav 407, Steeles Avenue
and Highway 7
The Claireville Conservation Area currently provides multifaceted regional scale recreation
activities for the Greater Toronto Area. Although much of the Conservation Area is currently
closed to public vehicular access, Wild Water Kingdom, Indian Line Campground, the
Etobicoke Field Centre and Claireville Equestrian Ranch are operated through partnerships
between the Authority, other agencies and individuals Some land is rented for agricultural use
and several houses on the property are rented for residential use
30 PRINCIPLES FOR MANAGING THE CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA
The approved 1997 Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan sets out 12 principles to
guide future activities These principles are
1 Site uses, functions, and their impacts will conform to the definition of each
management zone
2 Natural features and processes will be permitted to dominate the use of the area,
although they may be managed to perpetuate the natural features and processes
3 Motorized vehicles will not be permitted in natural areas except for specific
management purposes Parking facilities will be provided, where appropriate, subject
to need and available funding Bicycles will only be permitted in designated areas
4 Limits may be established for the number and frequency of visitors to the natural areas,
and any activities may be restricted or prohibited where it is necessary to protect the
natural and cultural features of the area.
E74 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
5 Recreational and educational uses will be designed and sited to complement the
environment.
6 Trails will be sited to provide access in a controlled manner
7 Existing public w:,es will be permitted to continue, wherever possible lands within these
areas will be restored to a natural environment.
8 The TRCA will work with the adjoining municipal authorities to assist in achieving the
management objectives for Claireville
9 The public, local community groups, municipalities, businesses and other agencies will
be requested to assist in the planning, implementation and operation of Claireville
10 Land uses will be managed through partnerships that consider local, regional and
interregional needs
11 Decisions regarding land uses will be based on a consensus of the stakeholder groups
12 Land uses will strive to be financially self-sustaining
4.0 MANDATE OF THE CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE
The Claireville Conservation Area Stewardship Committee will assist TRCA with the planning
and implementation of Ul tivities that are consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and
guidelines of the Clairevilie Conservation Area Management Plan
The Claireville Conserv'Q/:ion Area Stewardship Committee will
(a) Assist with the development and implementation of specific environmental restoration,
heritage and public use activities including, but not limited to, the following activities
. natural heritage management (ie reforestation and wetland enhancement),
. public access and parking,
. siting and installation of pedestrian trails,
. property maintenance including fencing and litter clean up,
. interpretive signage
(b) encourage and support the work of local individuals, community groups, businesses
and agencies in implementing the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E75
(C) promote and assist with the establishment of partnerships that will advance the
implementation of the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan and improve the
health of the Humber River watershed
(d) foster communication and education on Claireville Conservation Area issues, projects
and initiatives through public meetings, workshops, displays, publications and
community-based special events
(e) Assist in obtaining financial and in-kind resources to Implement natural heritage, human
heritage and public use projects
(f) Assist with monitoring activities to determine
-the effectiveness of habitat management activities,
-information on flora and fauna,
-public use impacts,
-future mE,~lagement requirements
(g) Provide input to The TRCA regarding the advantages, disadvantages and opportunities
of proposed public uses within the Claireville Conservation Area based on the approved
1997 Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan,
(h) Review the Claireville Management Plan periodically and make recommendations for
revisions, as required,
(i) Adhere to and provide advice on the implementation of the management principles, as
defined in the approved Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan dated April,
1997
50 MEMBERSHIP OF THE CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA STEWARDSHIP
COMMITTEE
The Claireville Conservation Area Stewardship Committee will include a cross-section of
stakeholders, including watershed residents, community groups, businesses, agency staff and
elected representatives The maximum number of members on the Stewardship Committee is
35
Voting representatives ot the Committee will include the following individuals
E76 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
SECTOR NUMBER OF REPS NAME
Elected Representatives 2 City of Brampton
To be determined
Municipal Staff --I 2 Bryan Smith, City of Brampton
To be determined, City of Brampton
Community Groups 8 Dave Darker, West Humber Naturalists
Lois Griffin, Humber Watershed Alliance
Alyson Hazlett, Stewards of Claireville
Luciano Martin, ARCH
Steve Roberts, Malton Cycling Association
Ron Scovell, Toronto Ornithilogical Society
John Willetts, Friends of Claireville
Watershed Residents 15 Brampton
Peter Boesener
Franka Cautillo
Don Ford
Janie Frank
Rob Frank
Tracey MacKenzie
Jeff Thompson
I City of Toronto
Arthur Mittermaier
Miriam Mittermaier
,
I Barbara Nagy
I Lynda Smith
City of Mississauqa
Yvette Fournier
Joanne Healy
City of Vauqhan
lain Craig
Deb Schulte
Businesses 5 To be determined, Humber Arboretum
Bob Lackey, Candevcon Limited
Enzo Maggisano, Woodlands Golf Course
To be determined, Toronto School Board
Barry Thomson, Claireville Equestrian Ranch
The Stewardship Committee members can designate a non-voting alternate who can attend
meetings when the regul,'=l,; member is unavailable
JulV 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E77
Ex-officio non-voting representatives on the Stewardship Committee will Include
. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff
. Chair, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
. Councillor Lorna Bissell, City of Brampton
. City of Mississauga elected representative or staff
. City of Toronto elected representative or staff
. City of Vaughan elected representative or staff
60 ALTERNATE MEMBERS, GUESTS AND SUBCOMMITTEES
Alternate members and guests are welcome to attend Committee meetings and participate in
subcommittee activities Subcommittees can be established to assist the Stewardship
Committee members with developing and Implementing specific tasks and projects The
Chairs of the subcommittees shall be members of Claireville Conservation Area Stewardship
Committee Subcomrnitj,~2s shall be disbanded when their assignment has been completed
and their activities reported to the Stewardship Committee
Alternate members and guests are non-voting members
7.0 SELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR
A Chair and Vice-Chair will be elected by the Committee members from within its membership
80 TERM
The Stewardship Committee members will serve a term of two years At the conclusion of each
term, members may renew their membership and new members may join subject to the
approval of the TRCA.
90 COMMITTEE SEL ECTION
The membership will be; r:!'Jiewed at least once annually to ensure the full complement of
members is maintained
A Selection Committee will be established to fill membership vacancies which may occur over
the course of the two-year term of the Stewardship Committee The Selection Committee will
consist of one TRCA staff member, the current Chair of the Stewardship Committee and one
current Stewardship Committee member The Selection Committee will take the following
factors into consideration when selecting new members
. demonstrated interest and/or active participation in land stewardship, ecological
restoration, recreation, community and heritage Issues
E78 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
. the ability of the applicant to meet the time commitments of the Committee,
. for resident members, the applicant must reside within the boundaries of the Humber
watershed
The Selection Committee will recommend new members to the Authority for approval
10. COMMITTEE MEETINGS AND ATTENDANCE
A quorum shall consist of fifty percent of the membership
The Committee shall operate within the Rules of Conduct of the TRCA, as adopted by
Resolution #3 of Authority meeting #2/86 or as amended If not otherwise covered, Roberts
Rules of Order shall be followed
The Committee is not a formal commenting body of the TRCA. Authority staff will advise the
Committee of Authority projects being planned or undertaken within the property or watershed
and of major planning initiatives or projects of others where the Authority may be a
commenting or permitting body
Decisions shall be made on the basis of consensus as far as possible If voting is necessary, a
simple majority of members present shall carry the motion, provided that the item was an
agenda item For items of New Business, a majority of the voting membership shall be
required to pass the motion as well The Chair shall vote only in the case of a tie
It is expected that there will be at least one meeting each month Meetings shall only be
scheduled when there lS '3ufficient business to justify the meeting A meeting may be cancelled
on the authority of the Chair for cause, eg a major snowstorm The date of the next meeting
should be set at each meeting, or at the call of the Chair
Members are expected to attend meetings consistently Missing more than three consecutive
meetings, or one-quarter of the meetings in any calendar year, without a reason acceptable to
the Chair, shall be cause for review, and possible termination, of that membership
Members unable to attend a meeting may appoint an alternative representative, with the
concurrence of the Chair Alternatives shall be briefed and provided with the necessary
documents by the member The member should also debrief the alternative member so they
remain current
11 . REPORTING RELATIONSHIP
The Chair shall report on the Committee's activities, to the TRCA PubliC Use Advisory Board,
with the assistance of TRCA staff, as required, but at least once each year
12. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
The TRCA will provide administrative support to assist in the operation of the Committee and in
the implementation of th",:ir projects, within the limits of TRCA resources
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E79
RES #E31/00 - CAMPGROUND PROPOSAL
Draft. Staff be directed to complete the Campground Proposal for major
improvements at Indian Line Campground and Albion Hills Campground
Moved by Dick O'Brien
Seconded by John Adams
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITYTHATthe staff be directed to complete the
Campground Proposal for major improvements at Indian Line Campground and Albion Hills
Campground involving total estimated expenditures of approximately $1,100,000 and seek
funding partners as part of the budget 'process for 2001 which would enable construction
to commence CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Meeting #6/99, held on November 5, 1999, Derek Edwards, North Zone Superintendent, made
a presentation to the Public Use Board outlining the growth in the Authority's camping facilities and
the associated revenue stream At that time, the staff was encouraged to prepare a proposal to
improve the capacity and quality of the Authority's camping facilities A draft proposal has been
prepared for discussion with the Board The staff would appreciate some discussion with the
Members of the Board prior to completing the proposal and seeking funding Camping facilities
are valuable tourism support features and provide a reliable revenue stream to the Authority which
supports other public use activities
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The proposal needs to be completed with a stronger rationale for municipal investment and the
appropnate potential partners need to be identified and consulted
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The draft proposal is targeted at this time to the Region of Peel but there is rationale to approach
other municipal partners given the broad regional nature of the GTA as a tourist destination
Report Prepared By Brian Denney, extension 6290
Date June 27, 2000
Attachment (1)
E80 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Attachment 1
~ronservatTon
~t> L TORONTO AND REGION
CAMPGROUND PROPOSAL
Taking Camping Into the Future
Julv 7 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E8l
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
GOAL
Increase vIsitation and business to Peel Region by Increasing attractiveness of campground with
upgrades to current facilities using best practices PrOViding a facility that will become a vacation
destination
BACKGROUND
Current camping trends are moving away from simple tent camping to RV's outfitted with modern
conveniences resulting in a greater demand for high- end full serviced campsites Many of our
competitors have alreaoy moved In thiS direction providing services sucr, as 50 amp service, "big
ng" pull through sites, i'lnd direct sewage hookup Along with these upgraded services, many
campgrounds also offe, ,r array of family onented recreational actiVities
By not offering these opportunities, potential viSitors are chOOSing to stay at other campgrounds
resulting In a loss of revenue to both campgrounds and Peel Region businesses
OUR INNOVATIVE APPROACH INCLUDES
Infrastructure Development
Regular introduction of facility improvements IS a key feature for the success of any facility, our
campgrounds currently lack the utilities and facilities that today's campers demand
ProQram Development
A key element for attracting and increasing visitation Includes new recreational facilities and
activities
Revenue Generation
Integration of infrastructure development and programs creates a more attractive destination to
Increase Visitation therefore generating more revenue to the Region of Peel
MarketinQ Initiatives
Working JOintly with TRC/' Marketing DiVISion to develop a marketing strategy that targets a wider
range of tourists
E82 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
PROPOSAL TO REGION OF PEEL
The Region of Peel has been supportive of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
(TRCA) campgrounds since their inception We ask the Region of Peel to Join with the TRCA in
developing and evolving services and facilities to meet the needs of today's campers, resulting
In an Increase In visitation and tOUrist dollars spent In the Region of Peel
The TRCA Campgrounds have demonstrated Innovation dUring times of financial restraints and
have met revenue targets that have enabled them to be financially Independent.
BENEFITS TO REGION OF PEEL
Surveys have shown that as facilities are added and upgraded In campgrounds, Visitation has
steadily Increased Improving the faCilities will enhance Increased Visitation by remaining
competitive with other campgrounds and by remaining as an attractive destination pOint to
campers Increased visitation will bring more business to the campground and the Region of Peel
Albion Hills
The creation of new facl Jtles Including serviced sites, store, laundry, rJlay areas and dumping
station have led to the generation of a Significant volume of new business at Albion Hills
Business has Increased rmm $248,500 In 1996 to $280,090 In 1999 An Increase of 1 2%
Indian line
Upgrading facilities at Indian Line Include the addition of pool, laundry, play area, and upgrades
to water and hydro, which have Increased customer satisfaction Since the start of major
upgrades In 1995 and new marketing Initiatives In the past three years, Indian Line has seen an
Increase revenue from $258,000 In 1996 to $527,593 In 1999 An Increase of 49%
Increased visitation at both campgrounds will result In Increased revenue to local businesses, as
campers use gas stations, grocery stores, auto/RV parts stores, restaurants, retail outlets and
tOUrist attractions
A five-year project to accomplish these goals would be Implemented Current facilities Will be
utilized and upgraded to meet the new standards New facilities and services Will also be
Implemented
July 7 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E83
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
Summary of projects
Additional washrooms
Landscaping
On-site sewage hookup
Upgraded hydro service
Additional recreational activities
Upgraded roads
Additional laundry facilitlec;
MARKETING PLAN
BACKGROUND
PrevIous to 1996 the TRCA campgrounds were managed and promoted Individually Internal
restructuring In mid-1996 saw the beginning of JOint management and marketing of the
campgrounds JOint marketing ads allowed for increased exposure to the camping public with
marginal decreases to marketing costs
In the past, campground marketing has been done mainly In house Our advertisements have
been produced In conjunction with Marketing and Conservation section staff Two brochures have
been developed for dlstnbution to the public See Appendix 1 and 2 One IS a glossy colour
brochure, "Camping Around Toronto," that has been distributed to Ontano Travel Centres,
Chamber of Commerce, CAA, RV Retail Outlets and varrous other Tounst Information Centres
The other IS an Informational brochure that is Included In mail outs to customers that have
contacted the campgrounds requesting further Information and are also proVided to campers when
they arrrve at the campground The campgrounds are also promoted through display ads placed
in vanous camping publications, travel and tounsm gUides, telephone directories and Camping
Association publications
Coupons are also being utilized in conJunction with the "Camping Around Toronto" brochure sent
to Tounst Information Cerrires and to past patrons of the campgrounds Tile coupons offer a free
night's stay with a minimum two nights stay Response has been favourable from both
campaigns
Ontano visitors have made up the maJority of new business to the campgrounds corresponding
to the Increase In advertising done with Toronto and Ontano Tounst Boards and Ontano telephone
directories
Dunng this same penod, VIsitors from the Untied States and International destinations have either
remained unchanged or increased marginally In the past year a jOint venture with Cruise Canada
Motorhome Vacations had proven sllccessful to attract tounsts from Germany to the
campgrounds However, the bUSiness attracted through Cruise Canada represents only a fraction
of the market potential Many International tour operators were recommending other campgrounds
for their patrons to use while visiting Toronto
E84 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
~.
.0-
,......-
.~
.I-"':r"""
.
_.
'.. , _.'7-....:. ,
., -..... "
......'" '-4
J ,.
. J
. , At,_,
- ,.... ""t..
.~- '-
"... .
..... ...... , ,
.. .".. ..: ......,...,
....-.....
- ':... '.f\:-::; ::::"'-
.
c
,.
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E85
I _ '1~
I ~t': .
I ' ,D A f, .
! 0'
r
I ,
i
! ~
i
1
I
!
i
i .
I
! , '\
I ~:~
I
I J$ .j "
~ \, '.
\ .-.,,_.~ ~
Camp just minutes
\ from Toronto's
I world class
I
I entertainment
attractions!
I
I
I
i
;
I
I ,f
i
i
I
I
I
!
i
,
!
,
I
! ~-'~
I -..,,' . '
I k.. . ,
I
I
i _'II:'
I
I -L~~
,
I
E86 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The future
By focusing our marketing towards these groups, we could see a significant return on each
marketing dollar spent.
GOALS & ACTIONS
The new marketing strategy would be developed In conjunction with TRCA Marketing and
Conservation section staff to Increase exposure to United States markets such as New York,
Michigan, OhiO and the Northeastern, and Central States
Ads promoting the region as a vacation destination will be placed In tounst publications and
newspapers Ads will Include promotion of local attractions like Wild Water Kingdom, Palladium
and live theatre Recreational activities like golfing, horseback ndlng and hiking on the Bruce Trail,
as well as shopping and dining opportunities In the Region, will also be focused on
International marketing will be targeted toward tour agencies In Europe rather than individual
tourists This direction Will likely produce a greater return on the dollar Many Europeans arrange
their vacations through tourist agents that book flights, RV rentals and set up vacation itinerary
for their clients Through educating European travel agents about our Campgrounds located In
Peel Region, just minutes from public transit to area attractions and discount ticket sales to major
attractions such as Can3da's Wonderland, Wild Water Kingdom and other area attractions, our
services Will be enhanced
ProfeSSional Information portfolios on both campgrounds Will be developed for distribution to
European Travel AgenCies They Will Include pictures and literature on the campgrounds and the
benefits of chOOSing the TRCA campgrounds as a destination for their clients
MARKETING COSTS
Costs include ad development, pnnting costs, distribution, ad space and staff cost.
Year 1 $12,000
Year2 $12,000
Year3 $10,000
Year4 $ 7,500
YearS $ 5,000
TOTAL $49,000
Marketing costs Include the purchase of ads in camping magazines, tounst publications, and local
newspapers A brochure will be deSigned and distributed targeting the Northeastern United States
and International touris) :Jgencles
JulV 7 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E87
VISITATION STATISTICS
TOTAL NUMBER OF CAMPERS
1997 1998 1999
Indian Line Campground 33 723 54,972 61,824
Albion Hills Campground 41 ,255 63,927 63,405
Total Campers 74,978 118,899 125,229
TOTAL PERMIT NIGHTS
1998 1999
Indian Line Campground 19,835 22,535
Albion Hills Campground 14,440 16,012
Total Permit Nights 34,275 38,547
ORIGIN OF VISITORS
Albion Hills Campqround Ontano
Ontano 71% Region of Peel 45%
GTA 28%
Rest of Ont. 27%
International 17%
Rest of Canada 10%
USA 2%
Indian Line Campqround Ontario
Ontario 58% Region of Peel 54%
GTA 16%
Rest of Ont. 30%
International 17%
Rest of Canada 14%
USA 11%
VISITATION TO TORONTO AND PEEL REGION
Millions of person-tnps
1998 - 21 1
1997 - 20 2
1996 - 21 7
MAIN VISITOR ACTIVITIES
1) Shopping
2) Sightseeing
3) Entertainment
EBB PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto li.:ilTld Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
MAIN VISITOR EXPENDITURES
1) Transportation
2) Restaurants
3) Accommodations
4) Retail
5) Entertainment
The tourism industry within Toronto and Region of Peel is composed of consumers who purchase
a vast range of products and services Gaining access to even a small share of this market could
lead to a significant boost for businesses In the Region of Peel
INDIAN LINE CAMPGROUND
Infrastructure
Campsites
Campsite Orientation and Specifications
The average site at Indian Line IS sixty feet Wide by thirty feet deep The main ground
cover consists of grass with a gravel parking pad The majority of sites are laid out as
"Drive Through", meaning that an RV can be driven forward onto the site and continue
forward to eXit the Site, eliminating the need to back off or onto a site Water and electrical
hookups are located either In the middle of the site or In between two sites Services
located between sites are shared by adjOining campsites Located on each site IS a dug
fire pit and picniC tables SUitable for up to SIX adults Campsites are marked by a permit
post located on the front corner of each site The campsite number IS clearly marked on
the post just above the permit holder
Summary of Campsite Services
Sites with hydro and water 183
Sites with only hydro 1
Sites with no services 53
Buildinqs
Washroom BUildings
All washroom bUildings have hot and cold water, receptacles, florescent lighting and
electriC heating
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E89
!
~ndianUNE l~ ~ ~.. re:q 'r....+. ~"..f.1 if.\tM, N{" l1"'il, .J?-.
campground .i';~~. ~r, !!;. ,~~:~\ !I ti ~\1~4 '.!~';r\ ~ ~ l~J';" ~~.
80,000
70,000 co~
\>"
Cl ~~
(,)
c ~ . t1{~;~~IJ:1~s,
C'O 60,000 ~~.
~ II";$/~;(',~,lt.~~
"Cl :~f~~~R~
c ~"
t1l \If!'':'i!l;'el~t~.;;
.. ~ ;~~'z~:,:~~:;},~t r~1'~~ri~:~:;i
.. .tk~~ . 'l~~J1:tl;o.~':~'~!':;:'!~' . ~,ii.&)i~~;r~tr:\;)
< 50,000 II 't.C'(!~'~i~~~~~II~r
~:'~~I!t~~:e3
'. ~fl;, ~:~~-i\~~'\~lt~
~~~*~j1,~~~r~
40,000 .'\ . ,tl',.,.~ I"':rf=?
fl;,'" ~~i~0~!~:~~~~~
;l ~t,~1~{/~:%f'~liZ
JJ~~Yi$~~>>t;:t
30 I 000 . ~~t~~~F.~~'~~~
,\",~,~,..,~1~", ~1~!-~k~:~L~"l' ii~t~~i~;
f~{:{~~~~t:)~
~'f~i~~~\;?fc. ~';'i.i\\
z~~D~~~~~l~ (~,l~m .i-'''',1~\\J:
20,000 ~1'x~!~bl~')"~~1 . '~.~ ~~~;~..~v
It ~h~J\~::r-f!r?
?~~;.~rtlr~~V~{
~~~~~~~1'~~!lt~
'1,1{:'~'Xr.~~I\':.'fir'
~'fJ~r~"'lvl:jm,?~~
1 0,000 . *i?~l\~~I~
,:}&.J,,,J\..~
0 :{;h!f~f~~~J~
199G 1997 1998 1999
Operating Year
~TORONTO AND REGION
.,}' CONSERVATION
son 10/99
EgO PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
f
':}-
.., .,
.J'I ~~7R1 i~
:l-" ~,~~. .C-:..:iI
J;IISionHILLS
~ampground ~!t .~..t'l fi:":: lr~ :~'\T ~? !f{;r SW;.' ~~~
g.'J\.~; Ta"I'/;:r.o'1,( :: ,~,..S ~.;1. ... ~I ..,..._ Uot.'l
80,000
~~ \)~
70,000 ~.,' bl
~'"
~
u 11,~~~j~~r~~i!r.,~it~ !~~~~~~~
c ~l~I~?~ '
~ 60,000
'tS
C I t'~:~-1I;\r~~i"~"1.
~ ~ 'fnINlttWJ~~ ;~'i~Jl~~:
*' .~~ ]~~~r~i~~ .
.. ,(,)
Cl; 50,000 b&" , 'V'"
b&^' ' "I,"jJ.Ot11f.f.,1!9 ~\ :,'f~pi~.~Z;j~.{~
~:{:.i"'i'~i1~1,1tt' ~:'a.~'-~.1'!J1/'r?-14~
~!?~~'ltr~~~I!?: ~:f$~~:~t~~tJ~!,
:~~:~~.~~~"~~?t:~ '~'~lt'H'il~?fk;,~ i~I}~~~ '
40,000 ,:~....~ '~'(.d" ....., '~~1;t.~(l;~ .
:".I{~~"'ltr;''''''''f...1
;~,~~-f.ij~~~ J.~~l.':!'~@~~;
~~ :"';~(r~Y.\11'; ;i~!~~{~\~~~1~~
I '1-'~~,'rl.~.l;tJ, 1'[$
30,000
20,000
'i.~ri~~51:I!lJ";N~
ltC&:~i~}f.f~'r;~'2
'il.:trjl~J'~otji:'I'~'
~~fJ~i~;~I~~;J~~ I
10,000 (I
0
~
1996 '1997 1998 1999
Operating Year
~9'TORONTO ANO REGION
~ CONSERVATION
son 10/99
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E91
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
FinchQate/Hillview Washroom Facilities
The following facilities consist of a single brick bUilding which house mens and women's
restrooms, a pool malnr:~nance room, men's and women's change noms, a storage room
and basement
Men's Washroom Women's Washroom
- 2 shower stalls w/change area - 2 shower stalls w/change area
- 5 toilet stalls, Including - 7 tOilet stalls, Including
one handicap accessible one handicap accessible
- baby change area - baby change area
- 4 sinks w/mlrrors - 4 sinks w/mlrrors
Men's Change Room Women's Change Room
- 1 shower stall - 1 shower stall
- common change room - common change room
Pool Mamtenance Room Storage Room
- circulation pump - cleaning supplies
- water filtration system - tOiletries
- chlorination system
- chemical storage
Basement/Service Corridor
- 4 electric water heat8 ~
2- 60 Gallon Electric 2- 120 Gallon Electric
- electric heating
- bUilding and outside electrical service panel
- sump pump
Humbervlew/Poplar Villaqe Washroom Facilities
These two buildings are constructed out of cinder blocks Each bUilding IS comprised of
a men's and women's washroom, an electrical service cabinet and maintenance cOrridor
Mens Washrooms (combined) Women's Washrooms (combined)
- 4 shower stalls w/change room - 4 shower stalls w/change room
- 4 urinals - 10 toilet stalls
- 8 toilet stalls - 8 sinks
- 8 sinks - baby change area
E92 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
Marntenance Corridor (combined)
- 4 water heaters
120 Gallon Electric
- toiletries' storage
- 2 sinks
Electrical Services Cabrnet
-breakers for all outside service to campsites
-building electrical panels
Summary of Washrooms Services
Toilets 30
Urinals 6
Shower Units 14
Sinks 24
Baby change area 4
Water Heaters 4 120 Gallon
2 60 Gallon
Retail Store and Registration Building
The Campground Store and Registration Building IS located at the main entrance on Finch
Ave The building IS a 50' X 11' prefabricated wood frame bUilding with wood siding,
electric baseboard heating, air conditioning, and florescent lighting This bUilding houses
the retail store and camper registration area and IS serviced through 125 amp panel
Marn Office Building
The main office IS a 54' x 24' wood frame bUilding with a brick exterior It houses staff
offices, lunch room, storage room and laundry facilities The laundry facility has four cOin
operated washers and four cOin operated dryers The hydro supply IS 200 amp service
Picnic Shelter
The picnic shelter IS located In the Humbervlewcamplng area directly behind the main
office bUilding The shelter IS a 20' X 40' open frame wood bUilding with a steel roof
Water and 30 amp hydro service IS available on site
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E93
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
Workshop/Dnve Shed
The workshop IS a 30' x 24' wood frame bUilding with wood siding It IS used for storage
of tools, maintenance supplies and lawn care equipment The d,- \ e shed IS a 40' X 30'
metal exterior building with wood frame It IS used for storage of equipment, tools and
bUilding supplies The vvorkshop has a 200 amp electrical supply panel that also feeds the
drive shed Only the workshop IS supplied with water
FACILITIES
Park Furniture
Park furniture consists of picnic tables and fire grates
There IS a total of 235 picnic tables at Indian Line Campground, one for each campsite
Only the 107 sites In Flnchgate and Hillvlew Village have fire grates
RecreatIOnal Facilities
SWimming
Indian Line offers a sWimming pool for campers Mechanics Include a pump and filtration
system and manual chlOrination The pool IS 20' x 40' with a maximum depth of four feet.
The pool enclosure Includes a cement deck, grass lounging area and perennial flower
beds
Water Base
Adjacent to the campground IS Clalreville Reservoir Recreational activities Include fishing,
pedal boating and car:lJC'lng Indian Line currently rents four pedal boats by the hour
Children's Play Area
The chlldrens play area Includes a Paris Playground play center, sWing set and sand box
ThiS recreation area also houses horseshoe pitS and a basketball :Iz court
Utilities
Water Supply
Campground water IS supplied by Region of Peel
Sewage Disposal
All sewage travels through the dumping station Campers can also dump waste from their
RV's directly Into the dumping station Sewage IS then pumped Into the Region of Peel
sanitary sewer system
E94 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
Hydro Service
Hydro IS provided by Brampton Hydro There are four on site transformers that are owned
by the TRCA. The transformers have an output of 100 to 112 KV
Street Lighting
Indian Line Campground has 22 street lights throughout the campground
All street lights have mercury vapor lamps and photo cells
Roads
The entrance way and main arteries are asphalt. All secondary roads In each village are
gravel
Length of paved roads 1 7 km
Length of gravel roads 24 km
Total of all roads 41 km
Waste Disposal
Waste disposal IS handled by a contractor Indian Line uses 6- SIX yard bins, which are
owned by the waste disposal company
Siqnaqe
Highway
Standard highway campground directional signs are currently In place on various major
highways and local roads
Highway slgnage Indicating direction and/or distance to Indian Line are located on regional
road 7 east of Hwy #27, Hwy 427 Just south of Finch Ave, regional road 7 Just west of
Goreway Dr Steeles Ave Just west of Finch Ave, and Hwy #50 north of Steeles Ave
Intenor
The Interior roads are also signed to control traffic flow
Directional Information
Standard Highway Stop signs 3 Laundry, Store, Washroom, Pool and
Directional Arrows 3 Main Office
Do Not Enter 2
JulV 7 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E95
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
ALBION HILLS CAMPGROUND
Infrastructure
Campsites
Campsite Orientation and Specification
Albion Hills Campground IS a full service campground offering more than 230 serviced and
unservlced campsites The campground IS located In the scenic roiling hills of Caledon,
just north of Bolton on Highway #50 on the banks of the Humber River and features a man
made lake The operating season runs from mid-May to mid-October and offers a range
of recreational activities Including sWimming, hiking, mountain biking, non motorized
boating, fishing and horseback riding FaCilities Include playgrounds, horseshoe pits,
laundry, campground store, full service washrooms, sewage dump stations and chalet
bUilding
The average site at Albion Hills IS sixty feet wide by thirty feet deep The main ground
cover consists of grass Water and electrical hookups are located either In the middle of
the site or In between two sites Services located between sites are shared by adjOining
campsites Located on each site IS a dug fire pit and picnic tables sUitable for up to SIX
adults Campsites are marked by a permit post located on the front corner of each site
The campsite number IS clearly marked on the post just above the permit holder
Summary of Campsit~ Services
Sites with hydro and water 172
Unservlced sites 62
TOTAL SITES 234
BUILDINGS
Washroom and chalet buildings Include hot showers, flush tOilets, hot and cold running
water, electrical receptacles, heat and night lighting The washrooms function on septic
systems
Sleepy Hollow Washroom Buildinq
The follOWing facility consists of a slngle.storey cinder blockbuildlng which houses a men's
and women's washroom, a disabled washroom, and utility storage room
Men's Washroom Women's Washroom
2 tOilet stalls 2 toilet stalls
1 urinal 2 sinks w/mlrrors
2 shower stalls w/change area 2 shower stalls w/change area
2 sinks w/llllrrOrS
E96 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
Disabled Washroom Utility/Storage Room
1 toilet 2 - 60 gal water heaters
I sink w/mlrror 1 laundry tub
Birch HIli Washroom & Laundry Buildinq
The following facility IS a single storey cinder block bUilding which houses men's and
women's washrooms, a laundry room, and utility/storage room
Men's Washroom Women's Washroom
2 toilet stalls 4 toilet stalls
Includes 1 disabled 8cl:esslble Includes 1 dlsableo accessible
2 urinals 4 sinks
2 shower stalls w/chi::j(1~Je areas 2 shower stalls w/change areas
2 Sinks
Laundry Room Utility Room/Storage
2 cOin operated washers 2 - 60 gal water heaters
2 cOin operated dryers 2 - 40 gal water heaters
1 laundry tub 1 laundry tub
Chalet Building
The chalet bUilding IS a two storey wood building hOUSing men's and women's washrooms
on lower level and a 1800 sq ft. meeting area With a kitchen on the upper level
Men's Washroom Women's Washroom
2 toilet stalls 4 toilet stalls
2 urinals 4 Sinks w/mlrrors
2 shower stalls w/ change area 2 shower stalls w/change area
3 Sinks
Utility Room
2 - 60 gal water heatel ;.,
JulV 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E97
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
Summary of Washroc:.!'.m Services
TOilets 17
Unnals 5
Shower Units 12
Sinks 17
Water Heaters 4 - 60 gal
2 - 40 gal
Camp Office & Store
This single storey aluminum sided bUilding has electnc heating, air conditioning and
functions on a septic system This bUilding houses the campground convenience store,
park office, staff washroom, and a storage area Adjacent to the camp office IS a fenced
storage area for firewood sales A prefabricated trailer IS situated behind the camp office
and used for additional supply storage
PiCniC Shelters
One picnic shelter IS located In the Sleepy Hollow area and IS a 30' x 30' open brick frame
building With a shingled roof ThiS shelter has 30 amp service
A second picnic she!te,' IS located In the recreation area and IS a 20' x 40' open wood
frame bUilding With a steel roof
Vault TOIlet
A wooden 10' x 12' outhouse With a 1000 gal cement vault IS located In Poplar Circle
camp area
ROADS AND PARKING LOTS
4 5 km of gravel interior roads
2 automatic gates
4 gravel VISitor parking lots - parking for 87 VISitors
UTILITIES
Water Supply
Water for the campground IS supplied by three wells on property that feed Into a 30,000
gal reservoir
Sewage Disposal
Sewage disposal operates via septic systems for the buildings and dump stations for
campers
E9S PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
Hydro Service
Hydro IS supplied by Caledon Hydro through two 500 amp sources
FACILITIES
Park Furniture
picnic tables 233
fire grates 233
Recreational Facilities
Swimming
Albion Hills Campground offers sWimming In a manmade lake with a sand beach The
sWimming area IS a 4r;f I ft curtained section within the lake and IS chlonnated
Boat Rental
Hourly canoe and pedal boat rentals are available at beach offering opportunities for non
motonzed boating We currently have eight pedal boats and four canoes complete With
life Jackets and paddles
Fishing
Fishing IS available In the man made lake, outSide of the sWimming area, and connected
rivers The lake IS stocked With raIn bo\^/ trout There IS also a natural population of brown
trout, brook trout, yellow perch, and rock bass In the nvers and lake
Hiking Trails
The area offers 27 km of marked and groomed trails SUitable for family hiking Albion Hills'
network of trails also connects to the Bruce Trail, the Humber Valley Hentage Trail the
Caledon Trailway, and the Trans Canada Trail
Mountain Bike Trall~;
An extensive network of marked trails designated for mountain biking Trails range In
length from 2 km to 9 '\;,rl With a total of 20 km through vaned terrain
Playgrounds
The campground has four adventure play areas, which Include sWings and sand boxes,
and are located throughout the campground
JulV 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 Egg
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
Recreation Area
The recreation area Includes horseshoe pits, basketball ~ court, and volleyball net This
area also houses a covered picnic area to accommodate recreational activities
SIGNAGE
Interior
Information and directional slgnage IS located throughout the campground
Standard Stop Signs 4
Standard speed limit signs 4
Caution Children PlaYing Signs 4
Site Location Signs - Large 2
Site Location Signs - Small 3
Entrance and directional signs 3
Highway Signs
Standard highway campground directional signs are currently In place on vanous major
highways and local roads
They are located at
King Slderoad and Regional Road #27
Hwy # 50 and 30th Slderoad
Airport Road and Mayfield Road
King Slderoad and Hwy # 400
INDIAN LINE CAMPGROUND
Future Upgrades
SEWAGE HOOKUPS
BACKGROUND
Requests from patrons for sewage hookups have Increased dramatically over the past
number of years Indian Line's clientele has changed over the past few years an Increase
number of patrons dnve large motor homes and look for campgrounds that offerfull service
camping Indian Line currently offers a central dumping station for campers to dispose of
sanitary waste Most campgrounds In the greater Toronto area offer sewer hookups to
patrons They Include the Toronto KOA, Toronto North KOA, Leisure Time RV Park and
Milton Heights Campground
Sewage hookups for seasonal campers would eliminate the need for them to transport
sewage through the campground, and allow campers to use their on-board facilities
E100 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
Currently these semi-permanent trailers use 30-40 gallon portable sewage totes to collect
waste that must be transported through the camping area to a central dumping station
This causes health and safety concerns and Increases the risk of sewage spills
PLANNING
Sewer hookups would be Installed In the first two rows of Humbervlew and Poplar Villages,
25 sites In total These sites are most appropriate as the eXisting sewer main runs under
this area
BENEFITS
The Installation of sewage hookups would result In Increased business In the campground
and local businesses, and Increased revenue Environmentally, direct sewage hookup
allows better control of waste disposal It eliminates the unauthorized practice of grey
water disposal on campsites and accidental spills that may pollute area water
FINANCIAL
Cost
The cost of Installing sewer hookup would be between $100000 and $1200 00 per site
Factors to be considered are length and size of pipe and trenching needed between each
site and the main sewer line, number of hookups Into main sewer line and If any eXisting
services such as hydro and water would have to be disconnected or relocated
25 sites X $1200 00 per site $30,00000
Cost Recovery
A premium for such sites would be added to the regular camping fee The average cost
of a sewer site IS $2 00 to $4 00 above regular camping rates at nAarby campgrounds A
premium of $200 00 pt-), year would be added to the seasonal rate for direct sewage
hookup
Cost Recovery Scenano
1 All sewage sites rented to seasonal campers
Rented as seasonal sites 25
extra charge for sewer hookup per season . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $ 200.00
Total revenue from seasonal permits $5,00000
Total cost recovery time 6 years
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E101
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
2 50% Seasonal Repials 50% Transient
50% seasonal rental 13 x $200 00 $2,60000
50% Transient Rentals @ 50% occupancy
Camping nights at 50% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Total Camping nights 12 sites x 89 nights 1068
Premium charge for sewer hookup (per night) $ 4.00
Total transient revenue $4,272 00
Total yearly revenue generated $6,672 00
Total cost recovery time 4 5 years
3 100% Transient Rentals
100% Transient @ 50% Occupancy
Camper Nights at 50% 89
Total Camping Nights 25 sites x 89 nights 2225
Premium charge for sewer hookup (per night) $ 400
Total transient revenue $8,90000
Total yearly revenue generated $8,90000
Total cost recovery time 3 5 years
UPGRADE HYDRO SERVICE
Poplar Villaqes
BACKGROUND
The camping Industry has evolved dramatically over the past few years More and more
campers are driving RV's complete with all major appliances, along with TV's, computers
and satellite systems The percentage of these RV's that patronize Indian Line has been
on a steady Increase over the past few years and will continue to Increase Significantly In
the future Many units are wired to accept 50amp service as It'S required In order to be
able to operate all onboard systems Indian Line's current electrical service only offers
30amp service and IS strained to ItS maximum Often the breaker to the sight must be
reset numerous times and the camper IS asked to refrain from uSing some of their onboard
equipment
BENEFITS
Developing an area Of the campground to handle these RV's WOI i1d Increase customer
satisfaction It would also keep Indian Line competitive with other area campgrounds that
offer 50amp service Upgrading the hydro service could Increase business by attracting
campers that previously Nould not have stayed at Indian Line
E102 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
FINANCIAL
Cost
The current underground electncal wlnng IS sufficient to operate 50amp service Some
of the wlnng at the pedestals would have to be upgraded and 50amp outlets would have
to be Installed It IS estimated that the cost to upgrade one pedestal IS $100 00 There IS
a total of 50 pedestals that need to be upgraded
50 pedestals x $100 au each $5000 00
Cost Recovery
Most campgrounds In the area that offer 50amp service charge a premium rate for these
sites The average premium charged IS $2 00
84 sites at 25% occupancy
Camping Nights at 25% 45
Total Camping nights 84 sites x 45 nights 3780
Premium charge for 50 amp hydro $ 200
TOTAL YEARLY REVENUE GENERATED $7,580 00
TOTAL COST RECOVERY TIME % year
NEW WASHROOM BUILDINGS
Humberview and Poplar Villaqes
BACKGROUND
Indian Line Campground has had dramatic Increases In VIsitation over the 1998 and 1999
seasons Our washr00m facilities were not designed for thiS high volume of users The
result IS long waiting periods In the morning for campers Currently the system IS handling
the high volume, but with the continuous stress the potential for the system to fail IS
Increased Limited dev"::lopment space restncts the ability to expand or construct additional
facilities In conjunction with eXisting washroom bUildings Plans would see the removal of
eXisting washroom bUildings located In the Humbervlew and Poplar Villages and replacing
them with new washroom facilities that could be outfitted with more modern fixtures that
aid In the conservation of water, and lessen hydro consumption and waste production
PLANNING
The removal of the eXisting buildings would either be contracted out to a demolition
company or be done In-house uSing TRCA staff and machinery If substantial savings could
be realized Any matenals that could be recycled would be removed before heavy
demolition occurred
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E103
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
New washroom bUildings would Incorporate energy saving design features such as low
flow flush toilets, energy saving showers, auto shut off taps to eliminate excessive water
use and use of natural light sources to cut down on electrical demand They would also
be designed with enough fixtures to handle the current user load and with provIsions for
Increased use
BENEFITS
The benefits of Improved washroom facilities would be Increased customer satisfaction
Long waiting periods would be eliminated They could also be models forfuture washroom
facilities that are more environmentally friendly and have less Impact on the regional
environment
FINANCIAL
Cost
Estimated cost of demolition of eXisting washroom building
and removal of materia: $ 50,000 00
Estimated cost of full service washroom bUilding
(Includes hot a'ld cold running water, flush toilets,
hot showers, healing, lighting and service room) $150.000.00
Total cost for each washroom bUilding $200,00000
Total cost for both Humbervlew and
Poplar Village washroom buildings $400,000 00
ROAD UPGRADES
Pavinq and Widenmq
Humbervlew/Poplar Villaqes
BACKGROUND
The majority of roads In Indian Line are paved, Interior roads that campers use to get to
their campsites are gravel The gravel roads require constant maintenance, especially
dUring the spring and fall to keep them free of potholes and weeds These roadways also
create a fair amount of dust throughout the campground Campers have expressed to staff
through surveys that road conditions are of concern and need Improvement
E104 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
BENEFITS
Paving of the interior roadways In Humbervlew and Poplar villages would eliminate the
need for constant grading and eliminate the dust created from vehicular traffic It would
also translate Into a higher campground rating In Industry camping gUides that the majority
of patrons use when choosing a vacation destination, making Indian Line look more
attractive to potential Cllstomers
FINANCIAL
Cost
Each village has approximately half
of a kilometer of gravel roadway
Total distance of roadway to pave 1 km
Cost per kilometer of roadway $15,000.00
TOTAL $15,00000
EXPANSION OF LAUNDRY FACILITIES
BACKGROUND
Indian Line's laundry facilities consist of four washing machines and four dryers The room
that houses the facilities IS only large enough for the eXisting machines The laundry IS
often full to capacity and campers must walt hours to get a machine ThiS has resulted In
poor customer satisfaction and a loss of revenue as many campers choose not to do their
laundry dUring their stay
PLANNING
The laundry facilities WGuld be expanded Into the current retail prouuct storage area ThiS
would require the partial removal of an Interior wall and Installation of additional hydro and
electrical service to ClCl ummodate an additional 2 washer and 2 dryer machines and an
area for folding laundry
BENEFITS
The expansion of the eXisting facilities would allow Indian Line to meet the needs of our
campers and Increase revenue by accommodating a higher volume of laundry and
Increased laundry supply sales at our retail store
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E105
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
FINANCIAL
COST
Materials
2 washing machines and 2 dryers
$1,539 00 for Washer & Dryer pair $6, 1 56 00
Install of additional Electrical and Water Service $ 500 00
Construction Materials $ 300.00
TOTAL (supplies & matenals) $6,95600
Labour
40 hours @ 20 00 per hour $ 800 00
Total Cost $7,75600
REVENUE
Average yearly revenue based on last two years $5,90000
Average yearly revenue generated per machine $ 738 00
Estimated yearly addlti,Jllal revenue
4 machines x $738 00 per machine $2,952 00
Cost recovery time 2 5 yrs
SOFT LANDSCAPING UPGRADES
BACKGROUND
Indian Line currently IS classed as an open space campground with small to medium
vegetation Privacy between campsites IS virtually non eXistent. ThiS lack of privacy
creates problems when one or two sites are louder than normal and disturb other campers
In the area Also campers feel that their actions are on display to others due to the lack
of screening between sites Many campers request sites with trees when calling to make
reservations
PLANNING
The majority of the landscaping would be medium growth shrubs, with a mixture of
deCiduous and evergreens Small groupings would be planted along the boarders of
campsites to help define boundaries and create screening The areas where the shrubs
are to be planted would be excavated and backfilled with topsoil and dressed with mulch
In certain area's native trees would be planted to create shade and to Improve the
aesthetiCS of the camp'~: Dund Due to the poor SOil conditions throughout the campground
only certain species of trees surVive, Conservation Nursery staff Will be consulted
E106 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
BENEFITS
Adding more vegetation would help make the campground more attractive and provide
screening between campsites for pnvacy Soft landscaping will help to dampen nOise
created by campers
FINANCIAL
The estimated cost to r~lIt In the desired landscaping, Including labour and
matenals $50,00000
Hillvlew Village Upgrading
BACKGROUND
Indian Line Campground has seen dramatic changes In It's camping patrons dunng the
1998 and 1999 camping seasons Throughout our busy season our serviced sections are
filling to capacity most weekends and even some weeknights At the same time our non-
serviced section IS operating at 50% capacity Indian Line's main demand IS for high end
full serviced campsites To meet thiS demand It IS proposed that the current non-serviced
section, Hlllvlew Village, be redeSigned for full serviced sites The proposed design Will
see the creation of forty new full serviced pull-thru sites These site's would also be
designed to handle large RV's that require a larger site with few obstacles for ease of
entenng and eXiting the campsite A number of non-serviced campsites Will be
redeveloped In another area of the campground as there IS stili a limited request for tent
camping areas
PLANNING/FINANCIAL
The other Villages In the campground have many underground services that make
Installation of new undf:"'rground service's a timely and expensive task. Currently Hlllvlew
has no services Installed, thiS Will make the Installation easier and cost effective Planning
will Involve restructunng of the roads, reslzlng of Sites, prOVide services to sites and
Improve area aesthetics The follOWing IS a breakdown of each service to be Installed and
the estimated cost Involved
BENEFITS
Upgrading Hlllvlew Village will Increase our capacity for RV's of all Sizes, and provide
specialized sites for larger RV's
JulV 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E107
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
ROADWAYS
EXisting roadways would be widened and paved to accommodate larger RV's The current
road system IS made up of one lane gravel roads and a double lane road around the
exterior The new roads would be wide enough to easily accommodate two large RV's,
approximately 20' wide for main roads and 15' for secondary roads, this would allow
enough room for any RV to easily and safely pull off the road onto the campsites There
would be approximately 1 7 km of roadway that would have to be paved
Estimated Cost of Pavinq
Cost per kilometre, Including preparation and re-pavlng $15,000 00
Total kilometres of roadway 1 7 km
Total Cost $ 25,500 00
CAM PSITES
EXisting campsites wouid be redeveloped Into pull-thru sites Water runoff ditches would
have to be either fil:e,:.~ In and culverts put In place or relocated to align with the new
campground deSign E.ach site would measure a minimum of 25 feet Wide by 50 feet deep,
the usual average size for pull-thru sites ThiS deSign will allow for four rows of ten
campsites to be developed In Hlllvlew Each site would Include a picniC table, fire pit and
fire grate
EstImated cost per site
Gravel $250 00
Top DreSSing $1 50 00
Grass Seed $ 50.00
Cost per Site $450 00
X 40 sites
Total Cost $18,00000
UTILITIES
HYDRO SERVICE
New hydro service will be supplied from the eXisting washroom bUilding located Just west
of Hillvlew Village Eledncal pedestals would be shared between ,I,VO sites Each would
offer hookups for 30 and 50amp service The total number of hydro standards needed IS
twenty The fOllowlnQ i<' 3 breakdown of estimated cost of Installing hydro service
E108 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
Trenching
1 500 feet x $ 75 per foot $ 1,125 00
Wiring
Underground Service
1500 feet x $3 50 per toot $ 5,250 00
Electrical Pedestals
20 units x $400 00 per complete unit $ 8,000.00
Total Cost of Hydro Service $14,37500
WA TER SERVICE
Water service will be supplied from an eXisting water line located Just south of Hlllvlew
Village Water hookups would be located between sites next to the hydro pedestals and
would run underground In the same trench as the electrical service The following IS a
breakdown of estimated cost of Installing water service
1" PVC 100psl rated water line x 2000' $6,50000
20 stand pipes $ 1 00 00
80 T connectors $ 1 00 00
40 Taps $ 1 30 00
40 Pipe Connectors $ 5000
Clamps $ 1 00 00
20 4x4 stand posts $ 1 00.00
Total Cost for Water Hookups $7,08000
SEWER HOOKUPS
Sewer hookups would also be located between campsites The sewer lines would run
down the middle of each row and hook Into the eXisting dumping station located Just South
of thiS village The hookup pipe would be located near the hydro and water stands Cost
factors Include size of pipe needed and number hookups and JOints
Estimated cost of Installation
Trenching
2500 feet x $0 75 per foot $ 1,875 00
Piping
2700 feet x $25 00 per foot $67.500.00
Total Cost for Sewer Hookups $69,375 00
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E109
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
TOT AL COST OF UTILITIES
HYDRO $14,375 00
WA TER $ 7 080 00
SEWER $69,375 00
TOTAL $90,83000
LANDSCAPING
Soft Landscaping
To help mark campsite boundaries and add privacy and Improve aesthetics landscape
designs will be developed Low growing plants and shrubs will be used between campsites
to define borders and act as screens for privacy from other campsites Larger plants will
be used at the end of camp rows and along outer roadways to help reduce nOise from
external sources like the highway and rail lines Costs Include plant material, back fill and
labour The total estlfn-.1ted cost IS $15,000 00
Hard Landscaping
Lighting and walkways make up the hard landscaping that are needed In this camping
section Street lights would be Installed every second row at both ends and at each
Intersection where the walking path crosses a road This would allow sufficient lighting for
security and safety, but not overly bright as to disturb sleeping campers The total number
of streetlights required IS eight Power Will be supplied from lines Installed to service the
campsites
Cost to supply and Install eight street lights IS estimated at $6000 00 Variable factors are
style of street light, distance from hydro hookup and Installation
A pedestrian walkway Will also be constructed from the eXisting washroom bUilding to the
furthest road at the east end of Hlllvlew Village The walkway would be paved and 4 feet
Wide The cost to Install, surface preparation Included, IS estimated at $1,500 00
Fencing
The major source of external nOise IS the Canadian National Railway main line that runs
adjacent to Indian Line';:: north end There IS currently a medium ievel grassed berm with
trees that act as a visual screen to the railway tracks but does little to cut down the nOise
from passing trains T'-1t~1 e IS also a 6' high chain link fence that controls access
E110 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
The installation of a nOise barrier fence would cut down the level of nOise and virtually
eliminate the possibility of patrons gaining access to the railway lines or unauthorized
persons gaining access to the campground from the railway lines The total length of
barrier fencing needed would be approximately 1000 feet and rL,n along the top of the
eXisting berm located at the North end of the campground, parallel to the eN railway
tracks
The fence would be constructed out of 6" X 6" pressure treated posts and 2" x 8" pressure
treated boards and stand ten feet high The following IS a breakdown of the materials
needed and estimated cost to Install 1000 feet of fence
101 - 14' - 6" X 6" PT posts @ $34 99 per post $ 3,534 00
2100 - 10' - 2" X 8" PT boards @ $10 75 per board $ 22,575 00
Concrete $ 850.00
Total Material Cost $ 26,959 00
TOTAL LANDSCAPE COST
Soft Landscaping $ 10,000 00
Hard Landscaping $ 7,500 00
FenCing $ 26,959 00
Total $ 44,459 00
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Roads $ 25,50000
Campsites $ 18,000 00
Utilities $ 90,83000
Landscaping $ 44.459.00
TOTAL $178,78900
Labour Cost
Most of the upgrade prices Include the labour cost of the contractors Staff labour would
be Involved In the water Installation, landscaping and campsite development
Estimated staff labour
Water Line Installation
6 staff @ 2 weeks 480 labour hours
average cost per hour $ 20.00
Total Labour Cost $ 9,600 00
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E111
---
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
Campsite Development
6 staff @ 6 weeks 1440 labour hours
average cost per hour $ 2000
Total Labour Cost $ 28,800 00
Landscaping
6 staff @ four weeks 960 labour hours
average cost per hour $ 2000
Total Labour Cost $ 19,20000
TOTAL LABOUR COST $ 57,600 00
TOTAL PROJECT CUST $236,389 00
COST RECOVERY
In 1999 Hlllvlew Camping Village generated Just over $79,00000 In revenue With an
average 44% occupancy for the entire season If the same occupancy rate was
maintained With the new serviced rates In place, the yearly revenue generated would be
approximately $112,000 00 at $27 00 per night This rate IS based on our current $24 00
per night camping rate plus a $4 00 premium for sewer hookups and $2 00 for 50amp
service As stated above a new non serviced area would be developed so as to not affect
the current revenue generated from tent campers
It IS fair to assume that our occupancy rate would actually Increase due to the newly
upgraded Sites, thereby increasing the revenue Yet It is difficult to estimate the new
occupancy rate for the sites
Summary of Revenue Generation
40 campsites rented @ 44% capacity
Total available camper nights at 44% 78
Total camper nights 40 sites x 78 nights 3120
Average cost per night $ 29 00
Total Revenue Genermed $ 90,48000
Total Cost Recovery Time
Excluding Staff Labour 2 yrs
Including Staff Labour 3 yrs
E112 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
ALBION HILLS CAMPGROUND
Future Upgrades
SEWAGE HOOKUPS
BACKGROUND
Requests from campers for sewage hookups have Increased over the past few years
Albion Hills currently offers central dumping stations for patrons to dispose of sanitary
waste The majority of campgrounds In the greater Toronto area offer sewage hookups
The Sleepy Hollow area IS mainly occupied by seasonal campers Currently these semi-
permanent trailers use 30-40 gallon portable sewage totes to collect waste that must be
transported through the camping area to a central dumping station ThiS causes health
and safety concerns and Increases the risk of sewage spills On-site hookups would
eliminate the need for campers to transport sewage through the campground
Sewage hookup for transient campers has become the norm In many nearby
campgrounds Many campers look for thiS feature when chOOSing a campground as a
vacation destination
PLANNING
Twenty-four sites In Sleepy Holloware sUitable for gravity fed sewage hookups Three
separate gravity-fed lines Will be Installed with three cement holdln~ tanks The estimated
cost Includes running ~ 0 feet of line from the main line to each site
Eight of the pull-through sites In Poplar Circle are SUitable for gravity fed sewage hookups
Sewage lines Will be Installed and fed Into a holding tank
BENEFITS
The Installation of sewage hook-ups would result In Increased business to the campground
and local businesses and Increased revenue
Environmentally direct sewage hookup allows better control of waste disposal It
eliminates the unauthOrized practice of allOWing grey water to be disposed of on campsites
and accidental spills that would pollute the watercourses
FINANCIAL
Cost
The estimated cost of Installing sewage hookups would be $5,000 for each cement holding
tank and $30 per foot for sewage lines Includes trenching, lines and accessories
July 7 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E113
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
SLEEPY HOLLOW
Holdlnq Tanks
3 holding tanks x $5,000 00 $15,000 00
Sewaqe Hookups
Sites 201 to 212 390' x $30 00 $11,70000
Sites 218 to 224 415' x $30 00 $12,45000
Sites 213 to 216 & 225 260' x $30 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $ 7,800 00
TOTAL $46 950 00
POPLAR CIRCLE
Holdlnq Tank
1 holding tank x $5,000 00 $ 5,000 00
Sewaqe Hookups
Sites 64 to 71 335' x $30 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $10.050.00
TOTAL $15.050.00
PROJECT TOTAL $62,000 00
Revenue
A site premium will be added to the regular camping fee The average cost of sewage site
IS $2 to $4 above regular camping rates at other area campgrounds A premium of $200
per site will be added for seasonal sites
Cost Recovery Scenario
1 Sleepy Hollow sites rented as seasonal
Poplar Circle as transient
Sleepy Hollow sites rented as seasonal
24 sites x $200 $4,80000
Poplar Circle sites rei Ik~d as transient @ 50% occupancy
8 sites x 70 camping nights x $4 00 premium charge $2.24000
TOTAL YEARLY REVENUE $7,04000
TOTAL COST RECOVERY TIME 8 8 years
E114 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 JulV 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
2 Sleepy Hollow sites rented as 50% seasonal and 50% tranSient Polar Circle as
tranSient
50% Sleepy HolloVlt rented at seasonal
12 sites x $200 per season $ 2,400 00
50% Sleepy Hollow rented as transient @ 50% occupancy
12 sites x 70 camping nights x $4 00 premium charge $ 3,360 00
Poplar Circle as transient @ 50% occupancy
8 sites x 70 camping nights x $4 00 premium charge $ 2,240.00
TOTAL YEARLY REVENUE $ 9,120 00
TOT AL COST RECOVERY TIME 6 8 years
UPGRADE HYDRO TO 30/50 AMPS
BACKGROUND
Camping technology has evolved over the past few years More and more campers are
driving RV's complete with all major appliances on board plus televIsions, computers and
satellite systems The percentage of these RV's that patronize Albion Hills IS on a steady
Increase Many units :oW? wired to accept 50 amp service and requ :\~ It to run all onboard
systems
PLANNING
The eXisting pedestals In the pull thru sites In Poplar Circle would be rewired to 30/50 amp
service Sleepy Hollow sites 201 to 212 offer easy access for large campers and have
been proposed to offer sewage hook up as well These sites currently have pedestals that
could be rewired to 30/50 amp service
BENEFITS
Developing an area of the campground to handle these RV's would Increase customer
satisfaction It would also keep Albion Hills competitive with other area campgrounds that
offer 50amp service Upgrading the hydro service could Increase business by attracting
campers that previously would not have stayed at Albion Hills
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E115
-
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
FINANCIAL
Cost
Poplar Circle
Sites 64 to 71 8 sites x $100 per site $ 800 00
Sleepy Hollow
Sites 201 to 212 12 sites x $100 per site $ 1,200,00
TOTAL $ 2,000 00
Revenue
The average additional cost for 50 amp service is $2 00 at other area campgrounds A
premium of $2 00 pcr site will be added to the regular camping fee at Albion Hills A
premium of $100 per site Will be added for seasonal sites
Cost Recovery Scenano
1 Sleepy Hollow sites rented as seasonal
Sleepy Hollow sites rented as seasonal
12 sites x $100 per season $1,20000
Poplar Circle rented as transient @ 50% occupancy
8 sites x 70 camping nights x $2 00 premium . . . . . ...$1,120.00
TOTAL YEARLY REVENUE $ 2,320 00
TOTAL COST RECOVERY TIME 1 year
2 Sleepy Hollow rented as 50% seasonal and 50% transient Poplar Circle as transient
50% Sleepy Hollow rented as seasonal
6 sites x $100 per season $ 600 00
50% Sleepy Hollow rented as transient @ 50% occupancy
6 sites x 70 camping nl;jhts x $2 00 premium charge $ 840 00
Poplar Circle as transient @ 50% occupancy
8 sites x 70 camping nights x $2 00 premium charge $1,120.00
TOTAL YEARLY REVENUE $ 2,560 00
TOTAL COST RECOVERY TIME 1 year
E116 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
LIGHTING
BACKGROUND
Lighting IS poor In the. .,ampground, proper lighting IS required for camper security and
safety The lighting would be designed to Improve safety and security, and at the same
time not be over done The total number of lights would be four
PLANNING
Each light IS one unit consisting of pole and light. EXisting power supply at the Sleepy
Hollowwashroom bUilding and at the automated gates would provide the necessary power
to service the new lighting unit
BENEFITS
Installing lights at these locations will provide necessary Illumination dUring normal
situations to protect human well-being and reduce chances of accident or harm to people
They would also help discourage vandalism
FINANCIAL
Sleepy Hollow Washroom $ 1,000 00
Sleepy Hollow Dump Station $ 1,000 00
Sleepy Hollow Automa-;:ed Gates $ 1,000 00
Camp Road Automated Gates $ 1 ,000.00
TOTAL LIGHTING $ 4,000 00
WASHROOM/SHOWER BUILDINGS - CAMPGROUND
BACKGROUND
In 1996 Albion Hills Increased the number of campsites In order to meet the demand
Since Increasing the number of campsites, our VISitation has Increased proportionately
ThiS Increase In campers has surpassed the acceptable capacity of our washroom
facilities The result IS long waiting periods In the morning for campers wanting to use the
washroom facilities
PLANNING
Prefabricated Fitzpatrick washroom bUildings Will be Installed In the Deer Run and River
Glen campground areas These washrooms Will be equipped With two low volume flush
toilets, complete With Sinks and auto shut-off taps The bUilding IS Installed on a cement
holding tank.
JulV 7 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E117
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
To provide new showers an addition will be bUilt on the eXisting Chalet bUilding which
currently houses a full service washroom The eXisting water and sewage systems will be
utilized to service these new showers
BENEFITS
Improved washroom facilities will Increase customer satisfaction Long waiting periods will
be eliminated and distances to washrooms will be decreased This will also help lessen
wear and tear on present facilities and reduce maintenance These new washrooms will
provide facilities to areas that presently have no service
FINANCIAL
Washroom Buildings
River Glen $ 17,00000
Deer Run $ 17,000 00
TOTAL $ 34,000 00
Chalet Building
Addition built on to present building
6 new showers $140,50000
PROJECT TOTAL $174,50000
UPGRADE SERVICES TO SITES 120-126
BACKGROUND
As trends move away from simple tent camping to RV camping with units outfitted with all
the modern conveniences such as teleVISion, stereo, and microwave ovens, the unservlced
campsites at Albion Hills are becoming under utilized With the Increased camping
business over the last few years, our current serViced camping arbas are often filled to
capacity and we are unable to accommodate customers In serViced sites ThiS results In
lost revenue to the ca Yipground, and to Peel Region
PLANNING
Sites 120 to 126 are currently unservlced sites Hydro and water lines will be Installed
from the eXisting services In the Birch Hill washroom which IS located approximately 200
metres away New hydro pedestals and water taps will be Installed on each site
E118 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
BENEFITS
Increasing the numbe ")f available serviced campsites will enhance VIsitation and expose
tOUrists to the area's businesses This will, In turn, Increase revenue to the campground
and Peel Region
FINANCIAL
Cost
Hydro from Birch Hili Washroom $ 2,000 00
5 Pedestals at $350 per pedestal $ 1,750 00
Water Lines
175 metres water lines $ 1 , 1 50 00
4 water stands x $25 00 $ 100.00
PROJECT TOTAL $ 5,000 00
Cost Recovery
Scenario
7 sites at 50% occupancy of a pOSSible 140 camper nights
7 sites x 70 camping n ..Jhts 490
Premium for serviced site $ 3.00
TOTAL YEARLY REVEi\JUE $1,470 00
TOTAL COST RECOVERY TIME 3 5 years
RECREA TIONAL AREAS
BACKGROUND
Albion Hills has been working to promote a more family oriented camping environment
Albion Hills needs to Increase family based recreational opportunities The recreation
area, currently houses a picnic shelter, horseshoe pitS, a volleyball net, and a basketball
court.
PLANNING
Install lighting to enable area to be used In the evening hours and fully utilize the picniC
shelter by prOViding hydro Pave the basketball court to reduce maintenance and proVide
a better surface for plaYing
BENEFITS
These actiVIties would Increase the quality of the camping experience and value for dollar
and potentially encou -age repeat or extended VISitation to the cCJmpground and Peel
Region
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E119
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
FINANCIAL
Pave Basketball Court $23,00000
Lighting and Hydro $ 5,00000
TOTAL $28,00000
UPGRADED ROADS
BACKGROUND
Albion Hills campground's eXisting roads are gravel With Increased VIsitation and
Increasing number of RV's, the current road surface IS not sUited to today's campers The
gravel roads require constant maintenance, especially In spring and fall to keep them free
of pot holes and weeds These roadways also create a fair amount of dust throughout the
campgrounds Campers have expressed to staff and through surveys that road conditions
are of concern and need Improvement.
PLANNING
EXisting campground gravel roads will be paved A total of 4 5 km of Interior roads would
be paved
BENEFITS
A paved road surface provides a smooth surface for driving and reduces dust, Improving
the quality of the camping experience Paving of the Interior roadWayS would eliminate the
need for constant grading and eliminate the dust created from vehicles It would also
translate Into a higher r:ampground rating In Industry camping gUides that the majority of
campers use when chOOSing a vacation destination
FINANCIAL
Paving 4 5 km X $15,000 per km $67,500.00
TOTAL $ 67,500 00
E120 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Campground Proposal
Taking Camping Into The Future
SUMMARY OF FUTURE UPGRADES
INDIAN LINE CAMPGROUND
Sewage Hookups $ 30,00000
Upgrade Hydro Service $ 5,000 00
New Washroom BUildings $400,000 00
Road Upgrades $ 15,000 00
ExpanSion of Laundry Facilities $ 7,75600
Landscaping Upgrades $ 50 000 00
Hillvlew Village Upgrading $236,389.00
TOTAL $744,14500
ALBION HILLS CAMPGROUND
Sewage Hookups $ 62,00000
Upgrade Hydro Service $ 2,000 00
Lighting Upgrade $ 4,000 00
Washroom/Shower BUildings $174,50000
Add Service to Sites $ 5,000 00
Recreational Area $ 28,00000
Upgrade Roads $ 67,500.00
TOTAL $343,00000
TOTAL COMBINED $1,087,14500
---. -
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E121
RES.#E32/00 - CLAIREVILLE NATURAL AREA ENHANCEMENT PLAN
Approval of the Claireville Natural Area Enhancement Plan
Moved by Maria Augimeri
Seconded by Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Claireville Natural Area
Enhancement Plan, as appended, be approved,
AND FURTHER THAT staff continue to assistthe Claireville Conservation Area Stewardship
Committee to implement the Claireville Natural Area Enhancement Plan
AMENDMENT
RES #33/00
Moved by Maria Auglmeri
Seconded by Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THA T the following be inserted as the last paragraph of the main motion
.
THA T a letter of appreciation be sent to the Claireville Conservation Area Stewardship
Committee on behalf of the Authority
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Claireville Conservation Area is an 848 hectare (2,100 acre) parcel of land owned by The
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) The area is located in the West Humber
subwatershed of the Humber River watershed The public lands including the flood control dam
and reservoir within the Claireville Conservation Area provide an opportunity to create and
enhance a substantive wetland and terrestnal habitat complex in the Greater Toronto Area.
At Meeting #2/97 held on April 4, 1997, the Authority adopted, in part, Resolution #A46/97
"THA T the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan dated February 28 1997,
as attached, be approved,
THA T staff be directed to assist in the establishment of a Claireville Conservation
Area Advisory Committee made up of interested citizens, interest groups and
organizations, to continue to help the Authority in developing a vision for the
Claireville Conservation Area and the planning, management and implementatIOn of
the Management Plan, specific to those lands remaining in Authority ownership for
open space and public use purposes "
E122 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
The Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan (TRCA 1997), identifies seven land use zones
for the Claireville Lands, including, Nature Reserve, Natural Environment, Primary Restoration,
Public Use, Public Use/Commercial, Commercial/Office Node and Surplus Land The overall plan
does, however, dictat!" a natural environment management philosophy and as a result
approximately 88% ofthf:: is.nd has been designated within the nature reSE::iVe, natural environment
and primary restoration zones
The overall goal of the natural areas enhancement activities at Claireville is as follows
Create and restore a diverse mosaic of habitat features within the Claireville
Conservation Area as a means of increasing wildlife diversity and ecosystem health
within the Humber watershed, provide unprecedented opportunities for community
involvement through a phased implementation approach that is in keeping with the
Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan.
To achieve the implementation of the Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan, a multi-year
"phased" enhancement plan has been developed - called the Claireville Natural Areas
Enhancement Plan Specifically outlined in this operating plan is a series of six habitat
enhancement and two public use components - reforestation, oxbow wetland enhancement, broad
flood plain wetland creation, scattered flood plain wetland creation, interior habitat enhancement,
wildlife enhancements, hiking trails, and parking areas Each of these components has Its own
objectives and targets Together, however, they function to complement the evolving habitat
communities at Claireville and form the desired mosaic of diverse and functional habitats In this
respect, detailed prescriotions will be prepared each year to guide the recommended annual
restoration projects
Each phase will be d5s'!:Vied and implemented to make incremental contributions to achieving
overall Remedial Action t-':dn (RAP) guidelines for wetland, riparian and forest habitat restoration
within Great Lakes Areas of Concern Specifically these gUidelines are as follows
Wetlands- Greater than 10% of each major watershed in wetland habitat, greater than 6% of each
subwatershed in wetland habitat, or restore to original percentage of wetlands in the watershed
Currently wetlands represent only 1 10% of the overall Humber watershed and only 0 40% of the
West Humber subwatershed
Riparian Habitat- 75% of stream length should be naturally vegetated Streams should have a
30m wide naturally vegetated buffer on both sides Currently only 2638% of the West Humber has
a naturally vegetated stream corridor
Forest Habitat- 30% of watershed should be in forest cover Greater than 10% of the forest cover
should be 100 metres from edge and greater than 5% of the forest cover should be 200 metres
trom edge The existing forest cover within the West Humber subwatershed is 6%
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E123
HABITA T ENHANCEMENT COMPONENTS
Oxbow Wetland Creation/Enhancement Objectives.
. enhance approximately 14 2 hectares of oxbow wetlands using selected berming, grading,
excavation and drainage modification, and
. create structural habitat specific to birds and amphibians associated with marsh and
swamp wetland habitats
Targets wood frog, chorus frog, wood duck, mink
Scattered Flood Plain Wetland Creation Objectives:
. create small connected and isolated wetland pockets throughout the flood plain,
(. establish approximately 12 hectares of wetland habitat,
. create critical habitat for marsh dependent bird species,
. through the creation of scattered wetland pockets provide a locai seed source to benefit
larger scale we~iar:d restoration activities, and
. provide critical nursery, juvenile and spawning habitatforflsh within the Claireville reservoir
and the associated reach of the West Humber subwatershed
Targets Virginia rail, blue-winged teal, northern pike, wood frog, chorus frog, marsh wren, green
heron, swamp sparrow
Broad Flood Plain Wetland Creation Objectives:
(subject to hydraulic and hydrology studies to confirm that these works will not compromise flood
storage and conveyance objectives)
. create large wetland pockets within the flood plain through extensive excavation and
grading,
. establish critical habitat for fish, amphibians and wetland birds by providing a diversity of
aquatic and emergent wetland conditions that includes shelter, forage and breeding areas,
. establish rocky ramps at selected locations within the river channel to elevate water levels,
. place excavated fill in the north end of Claireville reservoir to create islands, and
. create extensive stands of emergent vegetation to support area sensitive marsh species
The exact proportions and species mix will be determined upon availability from suppliers, the soil
and moisture regimes 07 each particular site, and the specific project bUdget.
Targets American Bittel'-, (1 territory) Moorhen (more than 4 pairs), Sora, Virginia Rail, Black Tern,
chimney crayfish, northern pike
Reforestation Objectives:
. reforest approximately 128 hectares of land
. diversify the landscape by increasing the diversity, structure and vegetation type,
. establish a 50/50 mixture of deciduous/coniferous cover;
. maintain planting density at 2,500 units/ha for seedlings,
. establish riparian vegetation and promote the successional development of plant
communities, and
. use reforestation to enhance buffer areas, riparian corridors and terrestrial habitat.
E124 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Targets wood frog, wood thrush, veery, wild turkey, long-eared owls, pileated woodpecker,
ruffed grouse
Interior Forest Habitat enhancement Objectives:
. maximize size, ,-;; (.:>e and connectivity of the interior habitat blocks,
. provide habitat for area sensitive species including interior forest birds and rich woods
flora,
. create a mosaic of interior habitat types,
. promote long-term viability by supporting larger populations of species, and
. provide buffers from negative external influences
To achieve these objectives, a number of small interior habitat enhancement sites have been
identified ranging from 0 04 to 1 8 hectares in size Through strategic planting and
enhancement techniques, large unfragmented blocks of habitat will be protected and
enhanced
Targets - wood thrush, veery, winter wren, cerulean warbler
Wildlife Enhancements:
Throughout the Claireville property there are numerous opportunities to provide specific wildlife
enhancements that compliment the overall habitat restoration and enhancement work These
enhancements can be species specific and can be designed to proVide critical habitat features
for target species
Examples of wildlife structures include nest boxes for wateriowl and song birds, brush piles for
small mammals, perche..: c:!ld snags for birds, fallen logs for amphibians, and, in-water
structural habitat (stumps, logs, rocks) for a variety of fish and amphibian species
PUBLIC USE COMPONENTS
Hiking Trails - Public use will be enhanced and facilitated throughout the Claireville Area
through the provision of a system of trails It has been envisioned that two or possibly three
levels of trail types could be developed in the Claireville property including walking trails, less
formal hiking trails and multi-use paths for pedestrian and equestrian use Inevitably, some of
the trails through the Claireville Property may provide the basis for an interregional trail link
between Brampton and the City of Toronto
The minimum trail standard for hiking trails providing for a low to moderate level of use will be
followed as per "Trail Planning and Design Guidelines" (MTRCA) This would include a cleared
right of way with minimum grubbing and native soil suriace A hiking trail would be cleared to a
minimum width of 1 metre
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E125
Parking Areas - In order to accommodate low to moderate intensity public use, three small, 10
to 15 car parking areas are proposed It is expected that minimum construction standards (i e
gravel base) for parking areas will be used to accommodate the expected level of use The
approximate size of a parking area to accommodate this level of use would be approximately
20 metres by 25 metres Parking areas would be fenced to control unauthorized access to
other areas of the property
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
. pursue additional funding partners to implement the phased components,
. prepare annual operating plans, and
. continue to work with municipal staff and the Stewardship Committee to identify
suitable trail alignments that link Toronto, Mississauga, and Brampton through the
Claireville property
FUTURE BENEFITS
Overall it is expected that the restoration activities at Claireville conform to the definitions of the
management zones outlined in the Management Plan and will closely adhere to the
environmental management guidelines that were recommended In addition the restoration
project can make a sizeable contribution to the health of the Humber Watershed by
. creating extensive wetland habitat through a phased approach,
. enhancing the diversity of flora through planting events,
. enhancing aquatic and terrestrial habitats by increasing structural habitat and cover;
. organizing volunteers and establishing partnerships, and
. utilizing project sites for educational purposes by the Conservation Authority, schools,
outdoor education centres and community groups
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The estimated total project budget is $3 6 million, which Includes iarge scaie reforestation
(approximately 128 ha) and wetland (approximately 76 ha) creation phased over a 6 year
period Confirmed funding in the order of $219,150 has been secured to support Phase"
activities including planting and wetland creation during the Spring and Fall of 2000 These
sources include the Canada Millennium Partnership Program ($70,000) EnVironment Canada
Great Lakes Clean Up Fund ($30,000), Peel Remedial Action Plan ($15,000), Environment
Canada EcoAction 2000 Community Funding Program ($4,150), and The Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority ($ i 00,000)
Staff and the Claireville Conservation Area Stewardship Committee are pursuing other funding
partners, such as the Trillium Foundation, and the Canada Trust Friends of the Environment
Foundation
Report prepared by Kristin Geater, extension 5316
For information contact Gary Wilkins, extension 5211
Date June 27, 2000
Attachments (1)
E126 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Attachment 1
CLAIREVILLE NATURAL AREA ENHANCEMENT PLAN
June, 2000
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
-
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E127
CLAIREVILLE NATURAL AREA ENHANCEMENT PLAN
BackQround and Location
The Claireville Conservation Area is an 848 hectare (2,100 acre) parcel of land owned by The
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) The area is located in the West Humber
subwatershed of the Humber River watershed Within Claireville, Salt Creek converges with the
West Humber River, north of Highway #7, to form a very wide and powerful river, one that is
subject to frequent flooding
In 1957, the TRCA acquired the Clalreville lands to construct a dam and reservoir to control the
flooding that was occurnng in the Lower Humber River valleylands and, subsequently, the
Clalreville Dam and Reservoir was constructed in 1964 The lands acquired for Claireville
represent almost 15% of the lands owned by the TRCA in the Humber watershed, making it
one of the largest tracts of land owned by the TRCA. In addition to containing significant
natural and cultural heritage features, the site is highly accessible to the public, and has
outstanding recreation, tourism and educational facilities and programs
The public lands, along with the flood control dam and reservoir within the Clairevlile
Conservation Area, provide an opportunity to create and enhance a substantive wetland and
terrestrial habitat complex in the Greater Toronto Area. At the present time, more than 80% of
the wetlands in southern Ontario have been lost due to agricultural practices and urban
development. In the Clalreville Conservation Area, there is the opportunity to reverse some of
that loss and achieve a net gain of up to 50 ha of wetland area and approximately 128 ha of
reforestation in addition to protecting and enhancing significant blocks of interior forest habitat.
The implementation of thiS project will involve reshaping the flood plain and minor manipulation
of water levels in the reservoir to regulate flow and surficial runoff to form permanent and
ephemeral wetland habiti'l.ts The form and function of terrestrial habitat will be restored
through planting agricultural lands and some abandoned fields, and clOSing gaps in existing
forest cover through stm.rp.gic planting and enhancement techniques Plantings will aim to
prevent erosion, increas8 "'pecies diversity, enlarge forests and link forest patches Monitoring
of the projects will follow with the assistance of local volunteers and TRCA staff
The overall goal of the natural areas enhancement activities at Claireville is as follows
Create and restore a diverse mosaic of habitat features within the Claireville
Conservation Area as a means of increasing wildlife diversity and ecosystem health
within the Humber Watershed, provide unprecedented opportunities for community
involvement through a phased implementation approach that is in keepmg with the
Claireville ConservatIOn Area Management Plan
E128 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
To achieve this goal, a i,.'ulti-year "phased" enhancement plan has bee'l developed
Specifically outlined in the plan is a series of five components - reforestation, oxbow wetland
enhancement, broad floc"i plain wetland creation, scattered flood plain wetland creation and
interior habitat enhancement Each of these components has its own objectives and
restoration targets Together, however, they function to complement the evolving habitat
communities at Claireville and form the desired mosaic of diverse and functional habitats In
this respect, detailed prescriptions will be prepared each year to guide the annual restoration
projects and sites within the overall plan
Habitat Tar~ets
Each phase will be designed and implemented to make incremental contributions to achieving
overall Remedial Action Plan (RAP) guidelines for wetland, riparian and forest habitat
restoration within Great Lakes Areas of Concern Specifically these guidelines are as follows
Wetlands - Greater than 10% of each major watershed in wetland habitat, greater than 6% of
each subwatershed in wetland habitat, or restore to original percentage of wetlands in the
watershed Currently, wetlands represent only 1 10% of the overall Humber watershed and
only 0 40% of the West Humber subwatershed
Riparian Habitat - 75% IA stream length should be naturally vegetated Streams should have
a 30m wide naturally vegetated buffer on both sides Currently, only 26 38% of the West
Humber has a naturallv-\ _)getated stream corridor
Forest Habitat - 30% of watershed should be in forest cover Greater than 10% of the forest
cover should be 100 metres from edge, and greater than 5% of the forest cover should be 200
metres from edge The existing forest cover within the West Humber subwatershed is 6%
The Claireville Conservation Area Management Plan (TRCA 1997), identifies seven land use
zones for the Claireville lands including, Nature Reserve, Natural Environment, Primary
Restoration, Public Use, Public Use/Commercial, Commercial/Office Node and Surplus Land
The overall plan does, however, dictate a natural environment management philosophy and, as
a result, approximately 88% of the land has been designated within the nature reserve, natural
environment and primary restoration zones
Overall, it is expected that the restoration activities at Claireville conform to the definitions of the
management zones outlined in the management plan and will closely adhere to the
environmental management guidelines that were recommended In addition the restoration
project can make a sizeable contribution to the following project objectives
. create 50 ha of w9t.and habitat through a phased approach
. enhance the diversity of flora through planting events
. enhance aquatic c:.i d terrestrial habitats by increasing structural habitat and cover
. organize volunteers to monitor wildlife at project sites
. utilize project sites for educational purposes by the CA, schools, outdoor education
centres and community groups
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E129
Habitat Enhancement Components
Oxbow Wetland Creation/Enhancement.
Oxbow wetlands are natural features found in the landscape adjacent to many river systems
These habitats naturally occur as a result of changes in the location of the river channel As
the river channel changes over time, the meander of the river or stream is cut off from the main
channel through deposition of sediment along the bank and the realignment of the main flow
These isolated oxbow lakes gradually fill in with sediment deposited by runoff or through
periodic flooding events Eventually, marshes evolve before a more te, I estrial riparian habitat
forms
Several of these historlca! oxbow features are present at the Claireville site and represent
excellent opportunities for wetland creation due to their location, topography, soil, and
drainage conditions The existing features and vegetation communities also allow for the
creation of both marsh and swamp wetland features at the Claireville site (figures 1 and 2)
Since they will be isolated from the main river, the wetland features are particularly important
for breeding amphibians, wateriowl and marsh birds
Figure 1 - Cedar Swamp Complex
Objectives
. enhance approximately 142 hectares of oxbow wetlands using selected berming,
grading, excavation and drainage modification
. create structural habitat specific to birds and amphibians associated with marsh and
swamp wetland habitats
E130 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Figure 2 - Marsh/Shrub Swamp
Targets wood frog, choru~ frog, wood duck, mink
A variety of native vegetative species are suitable for this restoration component. The exact
proportions and species mix will be determined upon availability from suppliers, the soil and
moisture regimes of each particular site, and the specific project budget
Scattered Flood Plain Wetland Creation.
By using existing topographical conditions, it will be possible to create a number of small
isolated wetland pockets throughout the flood plain within the Claireville property Modifying
suriicial drainage through selected berming is possible in some areas, while excavation to
breach the water table or connect the pockets to the river channel will be required in others
Due to various opportunities for flood plain wetland creation within the Claireville site, it is
possible to create a combination of connected or isolated wetlands Permanently or
seasonally connected wetlands are important as spawning and nursery areas for fish species
such as northern pike, while completely isolated wetlands which may be permanently wet or
ephemeral in nature, are 'ritical for breeding amphibians since they are protected from
predatory fish species (figure 3)
Objectives
. create small connected and isolated wetland pockets throughout the flood plain
. establish approximately 12 hectares of wetland habitat
. create critical habitat for marsh dependent bird species
. through the creation of scattered wetland pockets provide a local seed source to
benefit larger scale wetland restoration activities
. provide critical nursery, juvenile and spawning habitat for fish within the Claireville
reservoir and the associated reach of the West Humber subwatershed
Targets Virginia rail, blue-winged teal, northern pike, wood frog, chorus frog, marsh wren,
green heron, swamp sparrow
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E131
Broad Flood Plain Wetland Creation
The public lands, along with the flood control dam and reservoir within the Claireville
Conservation Area, provide an opportunity to create a substantive wetland and terrestrial
habitat complex in the Greater Toronto Area. At the present time, more than 80% of the
wetlands in southern Ontario have been lost due to agricultural practices and urban
development. In the Claireville Conservation Area, there is an opportunity to reverse some of
that loss and achieve a net gain of up to 50 hectares of wetland area.
The concept is to use a combination of three approaches to create this wetland complex
1 Maintain adequate recreational water level in the reservoir year round,
2 Use the flood control dam to raise spring water levels in the reservoir to inundate a
larger land area (i e figure 4),
3 Excavate soil from flood plain areas to create large wetland pockets and channels
connecting wetland depressions to each other and the river (i e figure 5),
4 Use excavated soil to create a combination of channels, islands and wetland habitats in
the north basin of the reservoir
This is a complex project that will require a multi-disciplinary team to determine the optimum
amount and type of wetland to create It will require expertise in wetland design and function,
terrestrial ecology, fisheries biology, engineering and public consultation For this restoration
component, a design team will be identified through the agencies and organizations and local
residents that have an interest in this type of work
Figure 3 - Shallow Emergent Marsh
E132 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7 2000
Objectives
. create large wetland pockets within the flood plain through extensive excavation and
grading
. establish critical habitat for fish, amphibians, and wetland birds by providing a diversity
of aquatic and emergent wetland conditions that includes shelter, forage and breeding
areas
. establish rocky ramps at selected locations within the river channel to elevate water
levels
. place excavated fill in the north end of Claireville reservoir to create islands.
. create extensive stands of emergent vegetation to support area sensitive marsh species
Targets American Bittern (1 territory), Moorhen (more than 4 pairs), Sora, Virginia Rail, Black
Tern, chimney crayfish, northern pike,
", ....
FIgure 4 - Flooded Meadow Marsh
July 7 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E133
The exact proportions and species mix will be determined upon availability from suppliers, the
soil and moisture regimes of each particular site, and the specific project budget.
Reforestation.
Figure 5 - Deep Emergent Marsh
Forests were once the dominant terrestrial habitat type in most of southern Ontario As a
result, the conservation or restoration of forest habitat is considered one of the highest
priorities for maintaining or restoring watershed health and biodiversity
At six percent, the West Humber River subwatershed has the least forest cover of the five
Humber subwatersheds and some of the lowest percentages of natural area cover (7 65%) and
npanan buffers (26 38%) of all of the Humber River subwatersheds Reforestation activities
within the Claireville Conservation Area will contribute toward the achievement of Remedial
Action Plan (RAP) targets of more than 30% natural area cover and more than 75% of riparian
buffer within the Humber watershed
Since large portions of the site are currently leased for agnculture or have histoncally been
maintained as open space for outdoor recreation purposes, there is an opportunity to reforest
approximately 128 6 ha of this site
Reforestation activities will be focussed in three ways, as follows
Forest establishment to create forest patches, increase the size and quality of existing forest
patches or create forested linkages and corridors between existing and restored habitats within
the Claireville property
Vegetated buffers concentrated around the property edges to both visually buffer the interior
natural areas and to protect the interior from external impacts and influences such as noise,
dust, and litter
Riparian corridors along river and stream banks within the property to provide cover, reduce
sedimentation and nutrification of the watercourse, improve aquatic conditions, and facilitate
wildlife movement.
E134 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Plantings will combine a mix of coniferous, deciduous, and wildlife shrub seedlings All
plantings will be planted in a random mixed fashion so as to mimic or recreate a mix of
naturally occurring species in an early successional forest (figure 6) The exact proportions
and species mix will be determined upon availability from suppliers, the soil and moisture
regimes of each particular site, and the specific project budget. Annual operating plans will be
prepared with details on the type of work, species to be used and costs
ObjectIves
. diversify the landscape by increasing the diversity, structure and vegetation type
. establish a 50/50 mixture of deciduous/coniferous cover
. maintain planting density at 2,500 units/ha for seedlings
. establish riparian vegetation and promote the successional development of plant
communities
. use reforestation to enhance buffer areas, riparian corridors and terrestrial habitat.
10 YR.
I'T. y/t
Figure 6 - Upland Reforestation
Targets wood frog, wood thrush, veery, wild turkey, long-eared owls, pileated woodpecker,
ruffed grouse
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E135
The costs estimated for reforestation activities are $5 5K per hectare of reforestation This is
based on a 50/50 mixed deciduous/coniferous cover with a planting density projected at 2,500
unlts/ha.
Intenor Forest Habitat Enhancement.
The forest cover that is contained in the West Humber subwatershed IS fragmented into
approximately 416 individual patches For the most part, these patches are too small to
provide a significant amount of interior forest habitat suitable for area sensitive species At the
present time, there are 8llproximately 15 hectares of forest that provide interior habitats greater
than 100 metres from the forest edge These habitats are found in 14 different patches
throughout the West Humber subwatershed
Within the Claireville property, there are a variety of opportunities to increase intenor forest
habitat or enhance the quality of existing forest patches through strategic reforestation
activities The overall size of habitat patches can be increased by adding a border of
reforestation around the perimeter, and fragmentation of habitat patches can be reduced by
filling in gaps In the forest and rounding off the forest edges
Interior plantings will generally be at a higher density than standard reforestation activities
Species will be selected based on the surrounding forest habitat, and will concentrate on food
or cover producing tree and shrub species
Objectives
. Maximize size, shape and connectivity of the interior habitat blocks
. Provide habitat for area sensitive species including interior forest birds and rich woods
flora.
. Create a mosaic of interior habitat types
. Promote 10ng-te,T,.! viability by supporting larger populations of species
. Provide buffers from negative external influences
Targets - wood thrush, veery, winter wren, cerulean warbler, wild leek
To achieve these objectives, a number of small interior habitat enhancement sites have been
identified ranging from 0 04 to 1 8 hectares in size Through strategic planting and
enhancement techniques, large unfragmented blocks of habitat will be protected and
enhanced
Due to the isolated location of many of the small restoration sites associated with the interior
habitat enhancement component, it is anticipated that these activities would be best suited for
specialized volunteer groups (i e scouts) and would not be suitable for general public
participation Cost estimates associated with this type of restoration activity have been
estimated at $1 OK per hectare (Planting density projected at 5 000 units/ha)
E136 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Hikinq Trails
Public use will be enhanced and facilitated throughout the Claireville Area through the provision
of a system of trails It has been envisioned that two or possibly three levels of trail types could
be developed on the Claireville property including walking trails, less formal hiking trails and
multi-use paths for pedestrian and equestrian use Inevitably, some of the trails through the
Claireville property may provide the basis for an interregional trail link between the City of
Brampton and the City of Toronto
The minimum trail standard for hiking trails provided for a low to moderate level of use will be
followed as per "Trail Planning and Design Guidelines" (MTRCA) This would include a cleared
right of way with minimum grubbing and no special tread surface, generally a natural trail that
would be cleared to a minimum width of one metre
Walking trails designed for moderate levels of use would have a cleared and grubbed right of
way with a firm compacted tread surface (granular gravel, shale) The minimum clearing width
for walking trails is 2 5 metres
Parkinq Areas
In order to accommodate the desired level of public use, a series of small, 10 to 15 car parking
areas will be established (see figures 7 - 9) at various points of access It is expected that
minimum construction standards (i e gravel base) for parking areas will be used to
accommodate the expected level of use
The approximate size of a parking area to accommodate this level of use would be
approximately 20 metres by 25 metres
Wildlife Enhancements.
Throughout the Claireville property there are numerous opportunities to provide specific wildlife
enhancements that complement the overall habitat restoration and enhancement work These
enhancements are species specific and can be designed to provide critical habitat features for
target species
Examples of wildlife structures include, nest boxes for waterfowl and song birds, brush piles for
small mammals, perches and snags for birds, fallen logs for amphibians, and, in-water
structural habitat (stumps, logs, rocks) for a variety of fish and amphibian species
In addition to providing habitat value, these wildlife structures also provide excellent
opportunities for public involvement in their construction and/or installation Many of the
examples listed are activities that can be undertaken as a component of a public planting
event
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E137
Partners
A number of agencies and organizations may have an interest in this project and are
considered potential partners These include Ducks Unlimited, Ontario Streams, The Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority, Ministry of Natural Resources, Regional Municipality of
Peel, City of Brampton, Humber Watershed Alliance, Claireville Conservation Area Stewardship
Committee, West Humber Naturalists, Kortright Centre for Conservation, Toronto Catholic
School Board, Etobicoke Field Centre, ARCH, Friends of Claireville, Humber College
Project Implementation and PhasinQ
The implementation and phasing of the enhancement work will be directed by a number of
guiding principles and conservation approaches that have been advocated by the TRCA and
demonstrated in many restoration projects throughout the GTA.
These principles are relevant to the Humber watershed and many have been outlined in the
"Legacy A Strategy for a Healthy Humber," as well as the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program Examples of these principles are as follows
. Protect existing vegetation and increase the amount of vegetation in the watershed by
planting trees, shrubs, grasses and crops In agricultural areas, greenspace areas, yards
and along streets
. Re-establish riparian vegetation including trees and shrubs adjacent to streams, rivers,
lakes, ponds and wetlands
. Establish well-vegetated wildlife corridors to connect tableland with valley and stream
corridor habitats to facilitate animal and plant movement
. Increase size of forest blocks, optimize their configuration and regenerate their edges to
provide a safe haven for plants and animals
" In restoration projects, use native plant species and eliminate invasive, non native
species
Priorities have been sU9~.j2sted for sites within each restoration component of the plan
(wetland, reforestation and interior habitat) The suggested priority of specific restoration sites
is shown in figures 7, 8 and 9, and was determined based on the following criteria
High Priority sites provide immediate benefit towards the creation of new buffer zones, new
ripanan corridors, stream bank cover or directly Increase the size or configuration of existing
large habitat patches In terms of wetlands, high pnority sites offer sufficient internal drainage,
topography and access
Medium Priority sites are those that increase size of existing buffer zones, wildlife corridors,
riparian corridors or increase the size and configuration of smaller existing habitat patches
E138 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
_n Low Priority sites may c, may not increase the size and configuration of smaller existing
habitat patches or provide only limited benefit to the creation of buffer zones, wildlife corridors,
or riparian corridors These sites are those with generally poor access and may require
implementation only by specialized volunteer groups or by TRCA staff
Although the priority criteria are directed primarily at enhancing environmental form and
function, it may be necessary to consider other factors including access and funding for
determining annual implementation priorities
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E139
Phase I
1999-2000
Phase I of the project, Initiated in 1999, resulted in the creation of a series of Interconnected
marshes in the flood plain through the creation of pools to capture surficial runoff This phase
of the project began with construction of a series of wetland cells at the end of 1999 and was
completed with grass seeding and planting in the spring of 2000 The gain in wetland habitat
from Phase I is 14,000 m 2 (1 4 ha)
Phase II
2000-2001
Spring Reforestation (approximately 146 hectares)
Project A. Toronto Catholic School Board/EcoAction 2000
The 10 acre (4 ha) project site is centrally located in the Clairevllle Conservation Area.
Approximately 5 acres (2 ha) were planted with student volunteers The planting was designed
to expand and consolidate existing vegetated areas while maintaining some open meadow
habitat area. Five thousand seedlings were planted by the Toronto Catholic District School
Board The seedlings were purchased with EcoAction 2000 funds from Environment Canada.
All planting plans and coordinating of equipment, labour and seedlings and other project
logistics for the projects were undertaken by TRCA staff The planting site was furrowed and
Authority staff was on site to organize the planting group and supply the seedlings for the day
of planting The school children provided the labour to hand plant seedlings and were
supervised by teachers and Authority staff TRCA staff will monitor the seedling success over
the next three years at which time a replant may be considered if stocking falls below 50%
Plantings combined a mix of coniferous, deciduous, and wildlife shrub seedlings All plantings
were planted in a randor"] mixed fashion so as to mimic or recreate a mix of natural occurring
species in an early forest succession The exact proportions and species mix were determined
based on availability fron; suppliers, the site, soil and moisture regimes of each particular site
and the specific project budget.
coniferous seedlings shrub seedlings
white pine American highbush cranberry
white cedar nanny berry
white spruce silky dogwood
red pine
deciduous seedlings
white ash
poplars
silver maple
ironwood
E140 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Project B Flood plain Wetland Restoration
In December 1999, the :" {:A implemented a wetland habitat creation project at the Claireville
Conservation Area. A total of five wetland pockets, covering an estimated 1 4 ha, were created
by excavating and regrading portions of the flood plain environment to enhance the variety,
shape and depth of wetland habitat features represented at this site Each of the pockets
provides for shallow and deeper open water habitat at certain times due to groundwater
seepage and over bank flooding During drier penods, it IS anticipated that wet meadow
habitat will be available as open water diminishes Surrounding the pockets are scattered
thickets of elm, soft maple, ash, hawthorn, willows and dogwood
A spring 2000 planting project served to re-establish the areas affected during construction of
the wetland pockets A great variety of native tree (1070 pcs) and shrub (1250 pcs) species
(list appended) were planted to provide enhanced wildlife cover and food sources, to expand
the number of tree cover species represented, and to connect the scattered thickets This
project also contributed to an overall increase in natural area cover
Project C Riparian Corridor Revegetation
The West Humber River has some of the lowest percentages of natural area cover (7 65%) and
riparian buffers (26 38%) of all of the Humber River subwatersheds This planting activity
contributes toward the achievement of Remedial Action Plan (RAP) tarS:,E~ts of more than 30%
natural area cover and more than 75% of riparian buffer
This spring 2000 project Involved the planting of 175 deciduous trees, 175 coniferous trees and
1500 riparian shrubs along a 500 metre section of the West Humber River to improve the
quantity and quality of woody cover through this reach The project site is located immediately
downstream of the Highway No 7 crossing The enhanced 10 metre minimum width riparian
corridor will serve to buffer this reach from adjacent agricultural fields Members of the
Claireville Conservation Area Stewardship Committee participated In this planting event
(approximately 50 volunteers) Additional volunteer groups were Invited to assist
Oxbow Wetland
A component of Phase II will be the creation of wetlands in a number of former oxbow basins
located north of the Phase I project site This wetland creation project will involve removing
debns and sediment which has infilled some of the oxbows over the years and redirecting
existing swales and ditches into the enlarged oxbow feature to capture and hold surficial
drainage In other areas, drainage will be captured and retained in the oxbow areas using
strategically placed berms and water control structures
Construction will begin in the summer when the risk of the river flooding the project area is less
likely A backhoe will be used to enlarge the oxbow basin along a 500 metre strip, increasing
its original size to 6,250 m2 (0 6 ha) A bulldozer will then be used to shape the sides and
redirect surficial drainagt~ ii ltO the wetland basins Once the site has been regraded and the
oxbow enlarged, volunteers and TRCA staff will plant the site with a diverse selection of site
appropriate terrestrial, and wetland plant species which will reduce erosion and create fish and
wildlife habitat. Volunteers will also be enlisted to create brush piles, bat houses and bird
boxes to further enhance the site
July 7 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E141
Fall Reforestation (approximately 8 5 hectares)
Reforestation activities in the fall of 2000 will Include portions of a number of sites within the
Ebenezer Tract that have been identified as high priority (Figure 8) as well as completion of
perimeter buffer plantings south of Hwy 7 originally scheduled for the spring of 2000
Western Valley Buffer Reforestation Planting
This site is located along the open western perimeter of the Claireville property The planting
for this site involves the preparation of contoured 5-6 metre wide planting strips, initiated over
the Spring/Summer 2000 periods, with tree and shrub plantings scheduled for Fall/2000
Further plantings will be completed in Spring/2001 The area involved covers approximately 10
hectares (25 acres)
Plantings will include 1500 deciduous shrubs, 850 deciduous trees and 850 coniferous trees to
establish a mixed deciduous-coniferous buffer along this 1,100 linear metre perimeter
Additional seedling reforestation plantings will infill the gaps left between the prepared strips
Approximately 10,000 seedlings will be required for the Spring/2001 period Buffer planting will
be undertaken along the perimeter of the Claireville property at sites 11, 12 and 13
Sites 24 and 26 are currently in agricultural production, but could be removed from lease
agreement and planted following harvest in 2000 Reforestation of these sites will increase the
size of the adjacent large forest patch
.
Site 33 is a ripanan area immediately adjacent to the existing equestrian trail and proposed
hiking trail alignment. This area, along with site 34, has been identified as a high priority area
for the re-establishment of a functional riparian corridor
Species to be used would include a variety of riparian and typical flood plain species (see
Appendix 1)
- - . -i !-Iollle 7 I m
_ ....) -- _",/'l'\ ... -'L.. --f::::..
,r . '" f\)
I -- ' --__ ''\ " " : __ .,' u' \ , Clalreville
I > . I
'. .:':'~ ~ .;~ .,' ~~:'!,," . , N atu ra I Area
.. .... .., "C. ,. .....
" I i,A' ~o ._. " ;,,/ ~ '., :.: <; .. -~ Enhancement Plan
\.... ).~rf ... ~ ~ \, -r. ..
...~ f::''lJ I ~ f... po -......
,.# r ;-._"'~, .~~ Wetland Restoration
1:1... t .'
)" ;.,'" ' .' J;," ~.";'~"~" Sites
~ I" /; ",;;.~::.- '"".
l'~'" ,.. - -?~ i....tJ;
"">>' .. / '''' )t'ot.
y ...J:~ t.. ... to :t-
. "~' t .Jc- z
I }'~\ ). ~ -0
I 'c'I' C
. Jf -- I ~
G'o ' I " -' _
"0", -, !t: " ,,- 0
~. ~ - I c
": l!.~ '~O,..o. ./ . Legend (f)
" " ....., .......-'t.i"~/':..~ ... ~_' m
'r " "'. 1'."", . , ")>
I l\... .:' /' -.., .~-, ,;~. , '\ I Hiking Trail 0
I,' .' ~ ,f-,'-'L r.. '.." - I '\ <
I '" .. f".t i ~ i~.f' ." en
:...,,, {' I ....,.\,f.".(./. \~~'~. - "i-' Property Boundary 0
I ., \, ~ '};" " {.b L.....J ~
#'-.. ! ~ -...;.. ........t {'. I..;..,.,.,....'t.!~
;~~ '..::\, ,. "'or ..~~ .:.~ '\. _ CD
,\ ~\ .:. ....:.~ P Parking Area 0
l." /~ (; -..) 4 f~ 'o!. e 5;
L'- i" ~. "" ~... '1;,"',....._ L"" ,. 0
~l '~t tr ....t;.. ..l~- I ~ \, \...]."'... It .
.~' . _.'~ .' r " .' PriOrities ~
....y1.. "'l... .!,. \. " __
~ r .,,-' ,,' ~ ~. , ~ H'igh 0
.. ,;"~' --1".... ~"- .<4" .l "': r~"'" ft-~"\ ~ 0
~.. ~ f1 ...;.~ \ Co . i, ,t.."" ~;;.."; ~[o:.i ....~~. "
" ,f'-!" \ "~ .,T \ ,.-'..'; ~ "'~' r,-;;:r:;.] Medium
l-'-. -1 I ~ . ~p- r .1-~i'" L1.)" .L~~
I ~ J ~/ .. * 4' "" - ~ ~ h L' ... " L
. ...,. ~ ~ .:::~, ~ ~ :~/ l J ow
N t t' ..~ '" .. / , t.\::"-\ \. '''- /t ... J ~. ,.~ ~ .i:- It,. . .... ... I
+ .... .. ....... f. \. <:\ i.~.,..... I ~"".5 .:....'!~ q ~.\.. ~~\';:_-:
.t- '\ . . .t,. - ,:-, r: ~
~ ~ '\1. 1 ~ "........~ 1-,~ .:.... /' -l. ..\'}-l .f-""'). ": ~it"lt. .... li
f '- -- '\..~ ~ i ...J ~i'''' 1:"l, .e - rt .t "#' r l'
- ........ ~ .,.. ..v." 1.,-~ l , ... .; ,~.. !j:J'~'" ~'\ \_r
..: t p..... .-- ,,~ ~; -..;.;\. ,~~.... } . ( .. _ 1:~'..:.' f J A ..;~.. :... '1. v-
' ',"'''' '\ ",.-:~':~~~..- )!~~'~i"." 4 " '. J.400L.",!:.0. .400: 800 M:ters ronservatlon
I.: "'- - , .......^ c~. \"'"f'':''' 1 ,,~;"t ,......1__ _ ~ \ t ~1()/?().""<')~\""I)I..t(.I().""
l' ........ .. l' . ~"''''''::l' "" to ....)- T
L .....1' ~",,'
c...
C
.-...J
I\)
o
o
o
----- --'--j Figure 8 I s:
- "
, . ~
[ .' , .' ' {". Clalrevllle I g
I " i ' , .,,', " A Natural Area I 0
: ~. , '~. 'r, . ",'i. - i Enhancement Pl.anl
: :J.... ~ ......._ .'
. '.. ."..-- ..;'C
"ll. ~. "\ ~ .,.- ,..,........- J. .
^ - .Qi. ;I..,;,,~'l;n- ~ - Reforestation SItes
- -. ,..,. ..-r ~
'lI', ~~ $._ .:..t.. ~;.
l 6l"..--- .. 1. '"
.; 00...1~" "";:.
~" ~ /'~ .,.... .. $.
~... i, ~O_... ".'t
.., 'J'o- ot
~ . ,
, ~
' C
l~, i- OJ
. C
' 0
.. -- c
I : .J~ Legend ~
- ~
' 0
! " " 'Hiking Trail ,;
. I ~
I 0
. , ,-, Property Boundary :!
":;"-- - .--.-., OJ
1', P Parking Area ~
.r,~ \ '1 0
' '. "--. . ,';' , Priorities 1!:
~~ -
'. " .-' . High is
t. I., .H'~.,
,":;I' 4-~ "\' " ~., , ";, '--' r.' - Medium
'---i4. . . f.. \ " ~-'_. ;'~ I I _
" ;-'t; " , ..,'}. ',..y l', 1.,,,i~J""l.J Low
H . '1' ., ~ :JU"-" .
1 " .~;) ~ . ......,.
.... d t ~.1 ;.~ I
';'. 0" '. ... ij \ " :r ,
' }.j ~ ,. '1-. ' '. ,
+'. ',~ -- ., f - r. _ I .' ....,
I r J, "'" " :J.e ..../ ~ .rJ' -'. ~
l. I -: " ~ . '. '. ..... ~f ,.~~~. ~J '\0.; I sb;"; ...,"- 0 1 . 500" .~ 1;6~ ~Aet:'rs rOl1servatron
' ~-'''''. "..' ./'fr-'~:f:J" ~.., ~ '~-i,,'" - -..;;;;:.. . . \.' (; L'U!<ONl()A....'I>I<l( /()'V II
.. 1 d,. i ;'J-. I" ~f_ -J:<h.J .,;.... _._." .. _. ,.
" .. tit;. ,.I-'!- "'\ ",' - .-I-'>_~ t4~ ".o:"..i.. ~
I
I
,
L
m
..,.
w
- - rlgur," <) m
I ~
.j>.
--- .j>.
I , Clalrevllle
, Natural Area
I ; ,
~
I , Enhancement Plan
.-
- Q:- C, f .~ .-
~~ .. t. fl.'"
~- Intenor Habitat
~' ~r;:, " .
- "
ri;' I.
~f _ "0' ~ , Restoration SItes I
~o ~ '/. 'j,
-?<? .
- .'; 24~6 , G'o~ i
25''1~19 -. <? <1l0
' . . ~ ~; ." <;'0-
~t..J~~ ...:'1 ,
l"~"" h. '. <' ",J; lJ
....... ...~1'...1A;. -""~::>'l-"r':", . , I C
J "",'" '- ~ } t ;;.i; ~ ~"..~t..:' ~. '" .~ ooI;rr m
~,: ;" ~"1 ~"" ~'. . c:
/~.. 0:.. { ~-:,' .6 ....11 . , ;'...-~ -
'. , ~t:-.; ... - ~ '9) '4 ~ ~~ t' . . - 0
:Z. /~ l.~. r i:r-. ~.,:l' _. _,; /' - , c
I ;:0. Pc. . - ,~,- . ~ 0:;.' - - t, Legend (f)
--\f'''?>~ ~ ,;~..r . f V'~_. .. ~ ~ .:..~.~~,-; 'f to . '. . J m
';-~<'Q'- fo;'/~, ~ ......""..;,,' . _I;>, ir"~;";~:~.1''j';ij '" \~'\
! ! .,If "'1'.'4~ -t-~... , t ..'" t- \ .f ,i',,' , ..:. )>
I ,. j "-.;:. .'/' I ~.. ,~.ig~;;: " 1''' " ~ ;, 1\ ' Hiking TraIl 0
i """,-:'J-'.r . :<;,)"i1;S"A -...., ~
- < . ....;... .. ... 0#' ", -':::J (55 .): t J ~ \ [' .' / (f)
I /.: - - ~ .... \ -' ~ ~; - '; ~-~~:.-:;}.ir~~ ~:.; . . .. . 0
I I '" C= Property Boundary
I , , . .. \ :IJ
I " :'..... ...., .,.. ~ 1 .. .f...... .-- t I -<
i ., .V' \ ; / I m
I I . \ F) Parking Area 0
I . \ " I )>
I \ , :IJ
i 0
I '*
Priorities .j>.
.,. ---
0
1 0
. - High
Medium
'\: Low
+ ,
L - .. I
~ -y.
'" 500 .~ '" _:0 500 1 000 t,1eters ronservatlon
, . , .
. ~- - f C 1< ,U< ).......,<) A.''V/,) Ul <,IC.)"\/ J
,
! .
c...
, ~
-----
.-.J
f\l
0
0
0
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E145
Proposed Funding Requirements Phase II
Estimated Funding Requirements Total 2000 2001
REFORESTATION
Toronto Catholic School Board/EcoAction 2000 $4,150
plant material $2,500
site preparation/sup2rvision/vehicle $1,650
Flood plain Wetland Resturation Plantings $14,000
plant material $9,500
labour/vehicle/eq uipment $4,000
seeding $ 500
Ripanan Corridor Revegetation $10,050
plant material $7,000
site preparation $ 550
labou r/vehicle/eq uipment $2,500
Western Valley Buffer Planting $35,000
site preparation $2,750
plant material $18750
labour/vehicles/eq u ipment $5,500
plant material (spring 2001) $8,000
Reforestation
Site 60 $75,300 $7,400
Site 26 $11,000
Site 24 $16 000
Site 40 $17,600
Site 33 $23 300
Subtotal $138,500
OXBOW WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
(Sites 5, 8 and 9)
Design $2,000
berming, excavation, water control structures $13,000 $15,000
plant material (incl labour) $10,000
habitat structures $ 2,000
Subtotal $42,000
E146 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
INTERIOR HABITAT ENHANCEMENT
ground truthing $1 ,200
plant material/equipment/labour $22,000
Subtotal $23,200
SCATTERED FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND CREATION
detailed design/planning $1 ,200
excavation/berm construction/plant material $45,000
Subtotal $46,200
BROAD FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND CREATION
test pits for soil analysis $500
Des ig n $20,000
Subtotal $20,500
TOTAL ESTIMATED FUNDING REQUIREMENTS $270,400 $90,300 $180,100
-
L
C
<:
_'-1
Appendix 1 l\)
0
0
0
Location, Priority and Approximate Cost of Reforestation Sites within The Claireville Conservation Area
Block Size Priority Timing Approximate Access Site Soil Type Type of Type of Planting Notes
# (Ha) 2000 Cost Prep Reforestation
($1000)
1 37 low $204 Equipment low mesic early successional Mechanical,
=good mixed upland Community hand <J
C
Community= forest planting, [Jl
good Staff hand C
0
planting C
Cf)
2 0.5 high $7.8 Equipment ? mesic-moist riparian buffer Community hand m
)>
=good planting planting 0
Community= Staff hand ::;
Cf)
good planting 0
Il
3 1.2 high $18.6 Equipment ? mesic-moist riparian buffer Community hand -<
[Jl
=good planting planting 0
)>
Community= Staff hand Il
good planting 0
*
..,.
4 2.9 med $16.0 Equipment med mesic edge Mechanical, old field --
0
=medium enhancement and Community hand 0
Community= forest block planting,
good expansion Staff hand
planting
early successional
mixed upland
forest
5 0.9 low $5.0 Equipment med Mesic early successional Mechanical, old mown
=good mixed lowland Community hand field
Community= forest planting
good Staff hand
planting
m
..,.
'-1
m
~
.i'>
OJ
Block Size Priority Timing Approximate Access Site Soil Type Type of Type of Planting Notes
# (Ha) 2000 Cost Prep Reforestation
($1000)
6 0.9 low $5.0 Equipment med Mesic early successional Mechanical, old mown
=good mixed lowland Community hand field
Community= forest planting
good Staff hand
planting I
7 1.0 high $5.5 Equipment med mesic-dry early successional Mechanical,
=excellent mixed upland Community hand
Community=ex forest planting, lJ
C
cellent Staff hand OJ
planting C
0
1.1 med $6.1 Equipment mesic early successional Mechanical, old field C
8 (f)
=poor mixed upland Community hand m
)>
Community= forest planting, 0
medium Staff hand :::;;
(f)
planting 0
JJ
$14.7 Equipment mesic urban buffer Mechanical, old field -<
9 0.6 high OJ
=poor planting Community hand 0
)>
Community= planting, JJ
poor Staff hand 0
*
planting .i'>
---
0
$13.2 Equipment mesic early successional Mechanical, old field 0
10 2.4 med
=poor mixed upland Community hand
Community= forest planting,
medium Staff hand
planting
11 3.8 high Fall $33.6 Equipment mesic urban buffer Mechanical, old field
2000 =medium planting Community hand
Community= planting,
medium Staff hand
planting L
~
12 4.3 low $23.7 Equipment high mesic early successional Mechanical, _--.J
=pOOl' mixed uplands rv
Community= forest 0
0
0
poor
L
c
Block Size Priority Timing Approximate Access Site Soil Type Type of Type of Planting Notes _-...J
I\)
# (Ha) 2000 Cost Prep Reforestation 0
0
($1000) 0
13 2.1 high Fall $174 Equipment mesic urban buffer Mechanical, old field
2000 =medium planting Community hand
Community= planting,
medium Staff hand
planting
14 2.5 low $13.8 Equipment high mesic early successional Mechanical,
=poor mixed uplands
Community= forest
poor -0
C
CD
15 1 7 low $94 Equipment high moist-mesic early successional Mechanical, old field wet c:
=medium mixed lowland Community hand meadow 0
Community= forest planting, C
(fJ
medium Staff hand m
)>
planting 0
:::;
16 0.7 low $3.9 Equipment high moist-mesic early successional Mechanical, old field wet (fJ
0
=medium mixed lowland Community hand meadow II
Community= forest planting, -<
CD
medium Staff hand 0
planting )>
II
0
17 2.7 low $14.9 Equipment high mesic-moist early successional Mechanical, current *
-i'-
=good mixed lowland pasture land ---
0
Community forest 0
=good
18 3.7 high $20.4 Equipment med mesic-moist early successional Mechanical, Planted in
=medium mixed uplands- the spring of
Community= lowland forest 2000
medium
19 3.2 high $17.6 Equipment med mesic-moist early successional Mechanical, Planted in
=medium mixed uplands- the spring of
Community= lowland forest 2000
medium
m
.j:>
<D
-
m
U1
0
Block Size Priority Timing Approximate Access Site Soli Type Type of Type of Planting Notes
# (Ha) 2000 Cost Prep Reforestation
($1000)
20 2.7 high $14.9 Equipment med mesic-dry edge Mechanical, current
=excellent enhancement and Community hand pasture land
Community=ex forest block planting,
cellent expansion of Staff hand
upland mixed planting
forest
early successional
mixed upland II
forest C
OJ
$12.1 Equipment Mesic-dry edge Mechanical, C
21 2.2 med 0
=good enhancement and Community hand C
Community forest block planting (j)
m
=good expansion of Staff hand }>
0
upland mixed planting :::;
forest (j)
0
JJ
22 11.0 low $60.5 Equipment Mesic-dry early successional Mechanical, under -<
=medium mixed upland Community hand cultivation OJ
0
Comm unity forest planting (winter }>
JJ
=medium Staff hand wheat) 0
planting '*
+>
---
Equipment med moist-mesic lowland Community hand 0
23 01 high Fall 0
2000 =poor floodplain forest planting
Community Staff hand
=medium planting
24 2.9 high Fall $16.0 Equipment moist-mesic early successional Mechanical, under
2000 =medium mixed lowland Community hand cultivation
Community forest planting (canola)
=medium Staff hand
planting
L
~
.-J
I\J
0
0
0
L
C
_-...J
Block Size Priority Timing Approximate Access Site Soil Type Type of Type of Planting Notes f\)
0
# (Ha) 2000 Cost Prep Reforestation 0
($1000) 0
25 8.2 high $45.1 Equipment med- mesic-dry early successional Mechanical, cultivated
=good high mixed lowland Community hand field (hay)
Community forest planting
=good Staff hand potential for
planting wetland
development
NW & SE
26 2.0 high Fall $11.0 Equipment moist-mesic edge Mechanical, under 'lJ
2000 =medium enhancement and Community hand cultivation C
Community forest block planting (canola) OJ
C
=medium expansion of Staff hand 0
lowland mixed planting C
(fJ
forest m
)>
27 4.8 med $26.4 Equipment moist-mesic early successional Mechanical under 0
:::;
=medium mixed lowland cultivation (fJ
Community forest (canola) 0
JJ
=medium -<
potential for OJ
0
wetland )>
JJ
development 0
'Ii:
high $11 6 Equipment Mesic-dry Edge Community hand Bordering a .j:>
28 2.1 --
0
=medium establishment of a planting steep 0
Community upland mixed Staff hand eroding
=medium fo rest planting bank
29 5.6 low $30.8 Equipment high moist-mesic early successional Mechanical, Old field,
=medium - mixed lowland Community hand pastu re
Community forest planting
=medium Staff hand
planting
30 3.7 high $574 Equipment riparian buffer Mechanical, adequate
=good planting Community hand natural
Community planting regeneration
=poor Staff hand m
planting ~
Ul
~
m
~
- Ul
I\J
Block Size Priority Timing Approximate Access Site Soil Type Type of Type of Planting Notes
# (Ha) 2000 Cost Prep Reforestation
($1000)
31 1.8 higb $27.9 Equipment riparian buffer Mechanical, under
=good planting Community hand cultivation
Community planting
=good Staff hand
planting
32 3.8 med Spring $20.9 Equipment moist-mesic early successional Mechanical, Old pasture
=good mixed lowland Community hand land,
Community forest planting
=good Potential for II
C
wetland CO
r
development 0
C
33 1.5 high Spring $23.3 Equipment moist-mesic riparian buffer Community band CfJ
m
2001 =good planting planting, )>
Community Staff hand 0
::;
=good planting CfJ
0
34 2.0 high $310 Equipment moist-mesic riparian buffer Community hand ]J
-<
=good planting planting, CO
Community Staff hand 0
)>
=good planting ]J
0
35 13.3 low $73.2 Equipment moist-mesic early successional Mechanical *
.p.
---
=good mixed upland and 0
0
Community lowland forest
=good
36 1 1 med $270 Equipment Mesic-dry urban buffer Community hand
=exceIlent planting planting,
Community=ex Staff band
ceUent planting
37 2.1 high $11.6 Equipment Mesic-dry early successional Mechanical
=good mixed upland
Community forest L
=poor ~
_--.J
I\J
0
0
0
L
C
-<
_-..J
Block Size Priority Timing Approximate Access Site Soil Type Type of Type of Planting Notes f\)
# (Hal 2000 Cost Prep Reforestation 0
0
($1000) 0
38 0.5 high $7.8 Equipment high moist-mesic riparian buffer Community hand South side
=poor planting planting Riparian
Community Staff hand enhancem en
=poor planting t
39 37 med $20.4 Equipment Mesic-dry edge Mechanical, under
=medium enhancement and Community hand cultivation
Community forest block planting, (winter
=medium expansion of Staff hand wheat)
"U
upland mixed planting C
forest (IJ
C
0
40 3.2 high Spring $17.6 Equipment low mesic urban buffer Mechanical, under C
2001 =medium planting & Community hand cultivation (f)
m
Community early successional planting, (winter )>
=medium mixed upland Staff hand wheat) 0
::::;
forest planting (f)
0
$25.9 Equipment high early successional Mechanical, old field JJ
41 47 med Spring mesic-wet -<
2001 =poor mixed upland aDd Staff hand habitat (IJ
0
Community lowland forest planting )>
=medium potential JJ
0
wetland *
development .j::.
--
0
in southern 0
portion
42 6.9 high $45.0 Equipment low mesic-dry urban buffer Mechanical, old
=excellent planting & Community h::lDd agricultural
Community=ex early successional planting, fields (not
cellent mixed upland Staff hand planted in
forest planting 2000)
43 1 6 med Equipment med wet-mesic edge Staff hand long term
=poor enhancement and planting pasture land
Community forest block
=poor expansion of
lowland mixed
forest m
U1
w
m
~
. U1
-i'-
Block Size Priority Timing Approximate Access Site Soil Type Type of Type of Planting Notes
# (Ha) 2000 Cost Prep Reforestation
($1000)
44 8.7 low $47.9 Equipment rned mesic early successional Mechanical, long term
=medium mixed lowland Community hand pasture land
Community forest planting,
=poor Staff hand
planting
45 0.6 low $3.3 Equipment high mesic-moist early successional Mechanical, current
=good mixed lowland pasture land
Community forest u
c
=good CD
C
46 2.2 med $12.1 Equipment med mesic early successional Mechanical, old field 0
C
=good mixed upland Community hand (f)
Community= forest planting, m
}>
good Staff hand 0
:::; .
planting (f)
0
47 1.4 med $77 ? Mesic-dry edge Mechanical, JJ
-<
enhancement and Community hand CD
forest block planting, 0
}>
expansion of Staff hand JJ
upland mixed planting 0
'*
forest -i'-
---
0
0
48 14.8 low $814 Equipment Mesic-dry early successional Mechanical,
=medium mixed upland Community hand
Community forest planting,
=medium Staff hand
planting
49 2.8 high $68.6 Equipment low mesic urban buffer Mechanical, old
=good planting Community hand agricultu ra I
Community= planting, fields
good Staff hand (clover)
planting L
c
-<
_--.J
I\J
0
0
0
L
C
-<
_--..J
Block Size Priority Timing Approximate Access Site Soil Type Type of Type of Planting Notes r\J
0
# (Ha) 2000 Cost Prep Reforestation 0
0
($1000)
50 15.9 low $87.5 Equipment low mesic early successional Mechanical, old
=good mixed upland Community hand agricultural
Community= forest planting, fields
good Staff hand (clover)
planting
hydro
corridor
potential for lJ
wetland c
OJ
enhancemen C
t 0
c
(fJ
51 2.4 med $13.2 Equipment low mesic early successional Mechanical, under m
=excellent mixed lowland Community hand cultivation }>
0
Community= forest planting, (corn) ::;
(fJ
excellent Staff hand 0
planting :IJ
-<
OJ
52 0.6 high $147 Equipment low mesic urban buffer Mechanical, under 0
=excellent planting Community hand cultivation }>
:IJ
Community= planting, (corn) 0
excellent Staff hand *
.p,.
planting a
0
53 1.9 high $29.5 Equipment moist-mesic riparian buffer Community hand
=good planting planting,
Community Staff hand
=good planting
54 2.8 high $434 Equipment moist-mesic riparian buffer Community hand
=good planting planting,
Community Staff hand
=good planting
55 2.3 high $35.7 Equipment moist-mesic riparian buffer Community hand
=good planting planting,
Community Staff band m
=good planting U;
U1
m
~
(J1
OJ
Block Size Priority Timing Approximate Access Site Soil Type Type of Type of Planting Notes
# (Ha) 2000 Cost Prep Reforestation
($1000)
56 1.9 low $46.6 Equipment ? mesic-dry urban buffer Mechanical,
=excellent planting Community hand
Community= planting,
excellent Staff hand
planting
57 0.9 low $22.1 Equipment ? mesic-dry urban buffer Mechanical,
=excellen t planting Community hand
Community= planting,
excellent Staff hand \J
planting C
OJ
C
58 1.3 high $20.2 Equipment moist-mesic riparian buffer Community hand 0
=good planting planting, C
({J
Community Staff hand m
=good planting )>
0
:::;
59 0.3 high $6.5 Equipment med- mesic-dry upland bank Mechanical, c u Itiva ted ({J
0
=good high stabilization Community hand field (hay) JJ
Community planting, -<
OJ
=medium Staff hand Bordering a 0
)>
planting steep JJ
eroding 0
'Ii:
bank ~
a
60 0.3 high Fall $74 Equipment mesic-dry urban buffer Mechanical, 0
2000 =excellent planting Community hand
Community= planting,
excellent Staff hand
planting
61 37 high $20.4 Equipment mesic-dry early successional Mechanical,
=excellent mixed upland Community hand
Community= forest planting,
excellent Staff hand
planting L
~
62 2.3 high $12.7 Equipment mesic-dry early successional Mechanical --.J
=good mixed upland -
N
Community forest 0
0
=good 0
L
~
Block Size Priority Timing Approximate Access Site Soil Type Type of Type of Planting Notes .-...J
# (Ha) 2000 Cost Prep Reforestation r0
($1000) 0
0
0
63 0.5 med $2.8 Equipment medium mesic-dry early successional Mechanical,
=good mixed upland Community hand
Community forest planting,
=medium Staff hand
planting
64 2.7 med $14.9 Equipment medium mesic-dry early successional Mechanical, old
=good mixed upland Staff hand reforestation
Community= forest planting site which
medium requires
lJ
additional C
material ill
C
0
65 10 high $5.5 Equipment med mesic-dry early successional Mechanical, old C
=excellent mixed upland Community hand reforestation (fJ
m
Community= forest planting, site which )>
excellent Staff hand requires 0
::;
planting additional (fJ
material 0
JJ
-<
66 0.6 high Fall $14.7 Equipment med mesic-dry urban buffer Mechanical, old ill
0
2001 =excellent planting Community hand reforestation )>
Community=e planting, site which JJ
0
xcellent Staff hand requires *
planting additional .P-
o
material 0
Total 203 $1,594.9
m
CJ1
-...J
E158 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Appendix 2
Plant Species Associated with Habitat Restoration Components
Oxbow Wetlands
Herbaceous
Coniferous Trees
White Pine Swamp Milkweed
White Spruce Swamp Aster
Tamarack Turtlehead
White Cedar Flat-topped White Aster
Canada Bluejoint
Deciduous Shrubs Fringed Brome
Nannyberry Fox Sedge
Alternate Leaved Dogwood Bebb's Sedge
Red Osier Dogwood Water Willow
Silky Dogwood Sweet Flag
Elderberry Tall Manna Grass
Chokecherry Marsh Marigold
Serviceberry Great Labella
Sandcherry Barber-pole Sedge
Snowberry Joe Pye Weed
Meadowsweet White Boneset
Shining Willow Porcupine Sedge
Slender Willow Fire Weed
Heart-Leaved Willow Blue Vervain
Sandbar Willow Eared Brome
Autumn Willow Riverbank Wild Rye
Deciduous Trees
Bur Oa k
Carolina Poplar
Balsam Poplar
Trembling Aspen
Eastern Cottonwood
White Elm
Green Ash
Sugar Maple
Black Walnut
Woody Plants
Buttonbush
Meadow Sweet
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E159
Scattered Flood Plain Wetlands
Plant Species
Bebb's Sedge
Water Willow
Sweet Flag
Tall Manna Grass
Marsh Marigold
Great Lobelia
Barber-pole Sedge Bebb's sedge
Fox Sedge
Hardstem Bulrush
Reforestation
Flood plain Wetland Regeneration
Coniferous Trees Deciduous Trees
White Pine Bur Oak
White Spruce Carolina Poplar
Tamarack Balsam Poplar
White Cedar Trembling Aspen
Eastern Cottonwood
Deciduous Shrubs White Elm
Nannyberry Green Ash
Alternate Leaved Dogwood Sugar Maple
Red Osier Dogwood Black Walnut
Silky Dogwood
Elderberry
Chokecherry
Serviceberry
Sandcherry
Snowberry
Meadowsweet
Shining Willow
Slender Willow
Heart-Leaved Willow
Sandbar Willow
Autumn Willow
E160 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
- Riparian Corridor Reg~"'ieration
Coniferous Trees
White Cedar
White Pine
Deciduous Trees
Silver Maple
Green Ash
Black Walnut
Bur Oak
Carolina Poplar
Balsam Poplar
Trembling Aspen
White Elm
Deciduous Shrubs
Alternate Leaved Dogwood
Red Osier Dogwood
Silky Dogwood
Virginia Creeper
Riverbank Grape
Clematis (Virgins Bower)
Elderberry
Serviceberry
Sandcherry
Snowberry
Meadowsweet
Peach Leaf Willow
Pussy Willow
Shining Willow
Slender Willow
Heart-Leaved Willow
Sandbar Willow
Autumn Willow
July 7 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E161
RES #E34/00 - DESIGNATION OF STONG, FLYNN AND HARNESS MAKER'S
BUILDINGS AT BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT (R S 0 1990)
Designation of historic buildings at Black Creek Pioneer Village by
enactment of a City By-law recognizes their heritage significance and
provides access to exclusive capital funding for their restoration and
protection
Moved by Linda Pabst
Seconded by Maria Augimeri
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT a request to the City of Toronto be
made to designate the original Stong buildings, the two Flynn buildings and the Harness
Maker's Shop at Black Creek Pioneer Village under the provisions of the Ontario Heritage
Act (R S 0 1990),
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to seek provincial capital funding for which
designated buildings may be eligible.
AMENDMENT
RES #E35/00
Moved by Linda Pabst
Seconded by Maria Augimeri
THA T the following be inserted as the last paragraph of the main motion
AND FURTHER THAT a letter be sent to the City of Toronto in appreciation of their support
of the Viliage and to provide an update of the work being completed, as well as a letter to
the Garden Club of Toronto in appreciation of their support.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Black Creek Pioneer Village Strategic Development Plan highlights the dire need for
restoration and repair of heritage buildings at Black Creek The City of Toronto has committed
$600,000 per year for five years to begin to address this issue In February, 2000 the Province of
Ontario launched the $ 5 million Heritage Challenge Fund, providing capital funding exclusively
for heritage buildings for the first time in a decade To qualify for the Heritage Challenge Fund,
buildings must either be designated, be protected by a heritage easement, or be properties that
a municipality has agreed to designate Under this program Black Creek may seek matching
funding up to a ceiling of $200,000
E162 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 July 7, 2000
Designation of a propertl{ can only proceed with the enactment of a City By-law by municipal
council under Part IV ) ~he Ontario Heritage Act. The process requires TRCA to request
designation by the City of Toronto The request is made through the Culture Division to the City
of Toronto Preservation Board The Preservation Board recommends to Council
Designation has traditionally been an Instrument of protection as well as an instrument of
preservation Designation usually applies to buildings which remain on their original locations, but
in exceptional circumstances, exceptions are made Once a building has been designated, any
future alterations, improvements or repairs are monitored and must be made in keeping with the
architectural values recognized in the designation
Black Creek Pioneer Village did not previously seek designation In the majority of cases in the
past two decades, designation was a protection instrument for threatened buildings Since the
buildings at BCPV had a clear heritage purpose, designation was not urgently required
However, six of BCPV's buildings were approved for listing on the former City of North York's
Inventory of Heritage Properties This list is used by the City to preserve and interpret the
architectural and social history of the community
The six listed buildings in the former City of North York included the Stong Grain Barn, Stong First
Settlers House, Stong Second House, Saddlery & Harness Maker's Shop (Hisey Farm Structure),
Daniel Flynn House and Daniel Flynn's Boot & Shoe Shop
Staff recommend initiating designation immediately for these listed buildings plus the Stong
Piggery (which is an original part of the farm complex The Stong farm complex and Flynn
buildings are top priorities for restoration in 2001 and would qualify for the Heritage Challenge
funding if the designation is underway Application to the Heritage Challenge Fund would be
made by September, 2000 for capital work to be done in 2001
DETAILS OF Vv'ORK TO BE DONE
Staff Will provide background information on the buildings to City Heritage Staff for the August
meeting of the City Preservation Board, With probable designation by-law time frame of Fall, 2000
Staff will prepare grant applications for funding for September submission
FINANCIAL DETAILS
There are no costs associated with designation Designated status creates grant eligibility for a
one time matching restoration project grant of up to $200,000 BCPV would be responsible for
raising 25% of project costs from non-governmental sources, with the balance being matched to
the City of Toronto Capital funding Black Creek has already raised the non-governmental
component.
For information contact. Marty Brent, extension 5403
Date July 6, 2000
July 7, 2000 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/00 E163
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11 46 a.m , on July 7 2000
Donna Patterson Craig Mather
Chair Secretary Treasurer
/ks
ITEM 1
~
V THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #5/00
October 13, 2000
The Public Use Advisory Board Meeting #5/00, was held in the South Theatre, Black
Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, October 13, 2000 The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the
meeting to order at 11 12 a m
PRESENT
John Adams Member
Mana Augimeri Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Linda Pabst Member
Frank Scarpitti Member
Dick O'Brien Chair, Authority
REGRETS
Doug Dickerson Vice Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
Donna Patterson Chair
RES #E36/00 - MINUTES
Moved by Maria Augimeri
Seconded by Michael DI Biase
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #4/00, held on July 7, 2000 be approved
CARRIED
164
PRESENTATIONS
(a) A presentation by Dan Stuckey, Theme Coordinator, Kortright Centre for Conservation,
on item 7 1 - Migratory Birds
(b) A presentation by Allan Foster, Acting Supervisor, Kortright Centre for Conservation, on
Item 7 8 - "Earth Rangers" Proposal - Kortright Centre for Conservation
RES #E37/00 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by John Adams
Seconded by Linda Pabst
THAT presentation (a) be heard and received with thanks
CARRIED
RES #E38/00 - PRESENTATIONS
Moved by Maria Augimeri
Seconded by Frank Scarpitti
THAT presentation (a) be heard and received
CARRIED
165
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES #E39/00 - BIRD MIGRATION
Bird Migration and the GT A
Moved by Linda Pabst
Seconded by John Adams
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the staff report on bird migration
and the GTA be received
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The continuing growth of the GT A presents serious challenges to Natural Heritage
conservation The following is the text prepared for a slide presentation on bird migration and a
Natural Heritage Strategy for the GT A.
. Each spring and fall, Toronto residents, if they so choose, can marvel at the spectacle of
avian migration through the city
. Believe it or not, hundreds of species of birds travel through Toronto either north to
breeding grounds In the spnng, or south to wintering grounds in the fall
. The checklist of birds recorded at Tommy Thompson Park is in excess of 260 species
Most of these are migrants
. While urban centres present numerous barriers to successful migration, literally hundreds
of thousands of birds will pass through Toronto each year and fare as best they can
. For the purpose of this presentation, we will concentrate on the fall migration, which IS
longer in duration then the spring migration and hosts many more birds
. A wide variety of environmental conditions are required in a given landscape to sustain the
annual migration of birds The migration needs of three different groups of birds illustrates
the many challenges regarding natural heritage conservation in Toronto
. The first group of birds is probably the group people are most familiar with The songbirds
or passennes
. Many species of this group have nested through the mixed and boreal forest regions of
Eastern Canada, taking advantage of habitat availability, long days and prolific insect
numbers to raise their summer broods
. Beginning in August, songbirds begin their long and arduous migration south
. Numbers will peak in Southern Ontario through September, with certain species moving
through our area as late as November
. The general method of movement for songbirds is in waves, stretching across the
landscape during the night
. One study puts the peak numbers of migrants moving through the Toronto area during the
Autumn migration at 30,000 birds per kilometre of migration front per hour
166
. On average, these birds will fly for 4 to 6 hours during the night and cover up to 75
kilometres
. After each night's flight, a songbird will spend from one to five days in an area to rest and
refuel
. The Great Lakes present a serious barrier to migration Songbirds flying south and
encountering the north shore of Lake Ontario will often stop for several days to feed before
undertaking the flight across the lake - one night's flight
. Almost all of the north shore of Lake Ontario is subjected to some level of urban
development
. Birds lucky enough to reach the shore on its eastern end will encounter ample natural
landscapes in which to rest and refuel
. Those birds reaching Lake Ontario's western end will not fare so well
. Lack of sufficient amounts of quality habitat will force birds to concentrate in any forest
stand or meadow Often these sites are poor quality due to disturbance or lack of the plant
diversity required to sustain sufficient food supplies for the thousands of migrants
. Add to this the tremendous toll tall lighted structures in the downtown core take on
songbirds and you can see that Toronto presents a very inhospitable migratory
environment.
. A report published by the Fatal Light Awareness Program and the World Wildlife Fund,
documents the data collected by FLAP volunteers over a three year period An average of
1,818 birds are collected during migration periods annually These collections are made in
the downtown core and only represent a small fraction of bird collisions across Toronto
. Birds not affected by collisions with windows in Toronto can be adversely affected simply
by the light of the city at night Birds are drawn to lighted areas and are reluctant to fly from
them into the dark Birds may fly about, confused for hours within the lighted core of the
city and succumb to exhaustion
. Songbirds are the group of birds most susceptible to the dangers of lighted structures in
the downtown core Many of the species collected by FLAP are experiencing continental
declines and mortality from collisions with lighted structures is implicated as one of the
factures contributing to these declines
. This mortality might even be worse if Toronto did not have the network of valley parklands
which generally run in a north-south direction throughout the city These valleys act as
natural corndors through which birds can travel to the shore and avoid many of the built
obstacles in the city
. The second group of birds are champions of long distance migration
. Shorebirds (sandpipers and plovers) have very specific habitat needs Unfortunately, like
the forests and meadows for songbirds, quality shoreline habitat is in short supply in
Toronto
. Unlike songbirds, shorebirds tend to concentrate in high numbers in very small areas
167
. One of the best examples of this concentration behaviour can be seen on Canada's East
Coast where virtually 100% of the continental population of Semipalmated Sandpipers can
be seen staging for migration along the north shore of the Bay of Fundy In mid-August
. Migrant shorebird numbers are nowhere near as large through this inland region of the
continent but we do experience some Species such as Baird's and Least Sandpiper
migrate inland and historically the now virtually extinct Eskimo Curlew was a regular fall
migrant through this area. The endangered piping plover not only migrated through this
region but was also known to nest on the Toronto Islands as recently as the 1940's
. Competition for and degradation of the require habitat is high in Toronto
. On the nice sunny days of late August, where do you find a lot of people relaxing and
enjoYing themselves?
. The waterfront And especially those sections of waterfront that retain some features of a
natural landscape
. Disturbance from sun seekers and recreational activity along our waterfront keep
shorebirds constantly on the move Leaving precious little time to rest and refuel
. The quantity of quality habitat is also a serious limiting factor Mudflats, undisturbed sand
and cobble beaches and seasonally flooded shallow wetlands are in short supply
. Fortunately, much of the regeneration efforts along the Toronto waterfront being done by
the TRCA includes the creation of habitat suitable for shorebirds
. The last group of birds might be a little surprising to you
. Not many "non birders" realize that thousands of birds of prey migrate right through
Toronto every fall
. Annual counts are conducted by the Greater Toronto Hawk watch in High Park
. Single day records of over 4,000 birds of prey have been tallied
to Diurnal birds of prey Include the hawks, eagles and falcons Turkey vultures are also
counted because they migrate through at the same time
. Unlike songbirds and shorebirds, raptors do not attempt to fly over Lake Ontario but follow
the north shore south west to Lake Erie then cross over the Detroit River
. Their flight characteristics makes it difficult to sustain flight over large bodies of water
. This group of birds rely on updrafts to assist them in flight Either thermal updrafts or
obstruction updrafts
. Thermal updrafts occur when air is heated over open lands, asphalt or concrete
. Obstruction updrafts occur where a horizontal current of air is deflected upwards by an
obstruction such as an escarpment, hill or tall building
. These columns of rising air are sought out and climbed in tight spirals In what are called"
kettles ,.
. A wide variety of habitat requirements are needed by this diverse group of birds
. Forests, open meadows, shorelines, open water and wetlands are ,required for roosting and
hunting
168
. Because these birds are at the top of the food chain, contaminants found in their food
items can bloaccumulate to levels much higher then found in the individual food sources
. Unfortunately, Toronto still contributes many dangerous contaminants to the food chain
. As you can see, a large urban area like Toronto presents serious obstacles to migrant
birds But Toronto and its migrant birds have had a helping hand for many years
. Thousands of hectares of habitat have been protected through the TRCA's land acquisition
program
. Through the TRCA's ecosystem approach to natural heritage management planning, each
watershed within the city receives special attention Environmental indicators are identified
and monitored, species of conservation concern are listed and remedial works are
designed and implemented
. Throughout the entire process, community Involvement IS key to the successful
implementation of an environmental management plan
. The importance of developing a coordinated natural heritage conservation strategy as part
of an overall environmental management plan is critical to preserve these birds and all
other life within the city The benefits of such a strategy go well beyond the confines of the
city itself
. Migrant songbirds for example, are the single most important natural Insect control The
birds that migrate through Toronto may be critically important in suppressing insect
infestations in Canada's northern boreal forests where they nest. Something of grave
concern to our country's forest industry
. Our federal government committed all Canadians to the preservation of our nation's natural
heritage when it signed the biodiversity convention at the Rio Conference in 1992 Much of
the work of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority directly benefits the aVian
migrants discussed in this presentation while contributing to biodiversity conservation and
environmental sustainability as a whole in the GT A.
. Preserving biodiversity - it's processes and functions we all depend on, is a responsibility
of all levels of our society
. and it is not just a wilderness issue Cities occupy space In the landscape once
inhabited by many forms of life
. A Natural Heritage Strategy will have to include not only restoration initiatives, but also the
tools required to allow local communities, business, politicians and interest groups to vOice
comments, seek information and most importantly get involved an ecosystem
approach
. The GTA is fortunate to have a network of nature landscapes within its eXisting park
system and public lands There is no reason why a thriving natural community including
migratory birds, cannot coexist within the city limits if we show a commitment to provide for
them
For Information contact Dan Stuckey, 905-832-2289, extension 237
Date October 05, 2000
169
RES #E40/00- KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION AND THE CANADIAN
PEREGRINE FOUNDATION - PARTNERSHIP PROPOSAL
Request from the Canadian Peregrine Foundation to enter into a
partnership agreement with the Authority to house their birds of prey at
the Kortright Centre for Conservation and provide a permanent exhibit for
public viewing and interpretive programming
Moved by Linda Pabst
Seconded by John Adams
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the request from the Canadian
Peregrine Foundation to enter into a partnership agreement with the Authority to house
their birds of prey at the Kortright Centre for Conservation be approved,
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
take whatever action necessary to finalise a licence agreement between the Canadian
Peregrine Foundation and the TRCA, and give effect thereto, including the obtaining of
any approvals and execution of documents
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Canadian Peregnne Foundation IS a Canadian registered chanty dedicated to
facilitating the recovery of endangered and threatened raptor species In Canada. To
carry out this mandate, the Foundation IS undertaking several projects to raise public
awareness of the environmental Issues affecting Canada's endangered and threatened
raptors, and IS supporting projects Involving the recovery, restoration and rehabilitation
of these species In addition, the Foundation IS documenting the status of the
Peregnne Falcon and other endangered and threatened raptors and making this
Information available to the public and, In particular to educational institutions
As part of the Canadian Peregnne Foundation's educational program, live,
non-releasable birds of prey are used In demonstrations Presently those birds used
by the Canadian Peregnne Foundation are housed In a vanety of locations, they have
been looking for a permanent facility to house their collection of birds, and have held
preliminary diScussions with Authonty staff with regards to the Kortnght Centre for
Conservation becoming the hOUSing site
As part of the partnership between the Authonty and the Canadian Peregnne
Foundation, the Authonty would offer space In one of ItS out bUildings at Kortnght for
the construction of holding pens for the birds (five pens In total) Kortnght staff would
also assist In the general up-keep of the birds Initially, up to five birds will be housed
at Kortnght Including Peregnne Falcon, Barn Owl and Kestrel
170
In return, Kortnght wl!ll;ave a permanent exhibit of live birds of prsy for public viewing
and Interpretive programming The pens will be constructed to allow public viewing
dunng operating hours In addition, staff of the Canadian Peregnne Foundation will be
available on a regular basIs to conduct programs uSing the live rap tors Selected
Kortnght staff will also be trained to handle the birds to allow for bird use In Kortnght
programs when Foundation staff are unavailable
RA TIONALE
The use of wildlife IS one of the most successful tools In environmental education The
public more readily accepts the need for natural hentage conservation when they see
the species to which conservation efforts are directed Kortnght spends considerable
amounts of money annually bnnglng wildlife demonstration agencies In for special
events One of the most popular (and most expensive) IS birds of prey demonstrations
The presence of the Canadian Peregrine Foundation's collection of birds at Kortnght
Will eliminate the need to hire outside demonstrators and afford Kortnght greater
fleXibility In program development and promotion
WORK TO BE DONE
Staff Will proceed to finallse a licence agreement between the Canadian Peregrine
Foundation and the Authority, and give effect thereto, Including the obtaining of any
approvals and execution of documents
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Capital cost of Improvements proposed as part of thiS request will be borne by the
Canadian Peregnne Foundation
Report prepared by Dan Stuckey, 905-832-2289 & Luch Ognibene, extension 5284
Date October 05, 2000
RES #E41/00- PROPOSED SOCCER FIELDS - BRUCE'S MILL CONSERVATION
AREA
Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville
CFN 31698 Receipt of a request from the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville
to locate four mini-soccer fields (equivalent to two regulation size soccer
fields) within the Bruce's Mill Conservation Area, south of Stouffville
Sideroad, east of Warden Avenue, Rouge River Watershed, in the Town
of Whitchurch-Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York
Moved by Linda Pabst
Seconded by John Adams
171
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the request from the Town of
Whitchurch-Stouffville to locate four mini-soccer fields within the Bruce's Mill
Conservation Area, south of Stouffville Sideroad and east of Warden Avenue, be
approved,
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
take whatever action necessary to finalise the lease agreement between the Town of
Whitchurch-Stouffville and the TRCA, and give effect thereto, including the obtaining of
any approvals and execution of documents
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority IS In receipt of a request from the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville to locate
four mlnl- soccer fields (equivalent In size to two regulation size soccer fields) within the
Bruce's Mill Conservation Area, south of Stouffville Slderoad and east of Warden
Avenue, In the Town of Whltchurch-Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York
In recent years, the Whltchurch-Stouffville Soccer Club has experienced tremendous
participation growth and currently has over 1,000 participants In their program To
keep up with thiS demand, and to address the needs of the community In providing thiS
program, the Town has requested we enter Into a short term lease agreement to allow
the Whltchurch-Stouffvllle Soccer Club use of the "Open Acres" picnic area for thiS
purpose
Authority staff has met with representatives of the Town of Whltchurch-Stouffville and
the Soccer Club to diSCUSS the details associated with the lease agreement for thiS
proposed use The term of the agreement would be three years, with no automatic
renewal option, additionally, there would be a termination provIsion allowing the
Authority to terminate the agreement on twelve months notice The Town will supply,
Install and maintain the soccer goal posts and provide for the field site preparation and
maintenance, the Authority will provide weekly grass cutting and will supply and empty
garbage containers
The season would run trom approximately May 15 to September 1 annually, and would
be used weeknights between 6 00 P m and 9 00 P m primarily by the House League
participants 6 to 11 years of age The use of the lands would Include shared use of the
eXisting parking lot and public washrooms at thiS location The Town of
Whltchurch-Stouffville has proposed an annual lease payment of $5,000 to the Authority
dUring each year of the agreement
The agreement would also Include standard conditions associated with Indemnification,
liability, Insurance and other general provIsions specific to the use of Authority lands at
thiS location
A map shOWing the lands subject to thiS proposal is attached
172
RA TIONALE
The lands subject to ti IS request are currently available to the general public as part of
the Open Acres picnic area, and consist of a mowed flat open field area. AnCillary
services such as parklrlg and toilets are presently available at this location, and It IS
staff's opinion that the proposed use by the Town of Whltchurch-Stouffville would be
complimentary to eXisting uses within the Bruce's Mill Conservation Area. Staff do not
feel this use poses any significant environmental Impacts to the property
It should be noted that staff are considering the possibility of uSing these same lands
for other revenue generating activities, for this reason, staff IS recommending the term
of this lease be three years to ensure the Authority IS still able to pursue other revenue
generating opportunities for these lands at some future pOint In time
WORK TO BE DONE
Staff will proceed to finallse the lease agreement between the Town of
Whltchurch-Stouffville and the Authority, and give effect thereto, including the obtaining
of any approvals and execution of documents
Report prepared by Luch Ognibene, extension 5284
For Information contact Luch Ognibene, extension 5284
Date October 03, 2000
Attachments 1
173
RE: PROPOSED SOCCER FIELDS BRUCE'S MILL CONSERVATION AREA 1>
Town of Whitchurch-Stouffvllle --+
REG MUNIC. OF YORK CFN 31698 --+
tlI
TOWN OF WHITCHURCH STOUFFVILLE C)
'" :::r
~ 3
"
!; (I)
n
JL '" ::l
_ TO WOOOBINE AVE GORMLEY STOUFFVILLE SiOEROAO --+
I ......
RES
GOLF RANGE
AGR
AGR
~
---J
~
a'~'
n
,
,
,
i LEGENO
:., ~
{ 1 ~ ['ltI5TlHGBl.OG
l___jtJ ~ F{J CJ ~"OPOSED 6LDG.
~[llSrv.G'1'tOOOLO;
_Q_~___ _~_ _~__ _m __ - - - ~'ftOI"05tO""OOO\.OT
~"ECIl[AnO,.uS(
f2:2:J AGRJCUlJ'UR! USE
c:=:J OPEN VACt
RES AGR WUHlC l.....ND USE
G CR = tl'lS11HG'f0All
l' -. - REO ST\l 'lDOOl1N[
0 '00 '00 '00 '00
,..t,.-1
loIO'p "liD
BRUCE'S MILL
CONSERVATION AREA
RES #E42/00 - RE:QUEST FOR PROPOSALS - BRUCE'S MILL GOLF CENTRE
8n ce's Mill Conservation Area, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Call for
proposal to lease an existing golf driving range operation situated at the
Bruce's Mill Conservation Area, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville
Moved by Linda Pabst
Seconded by John Adams
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to invite
proposals to lease the existing golf driving range operation in the Bruce's Mill
Conservation Area, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York,
AND FURTHER THAT staff report to a future meeting of the Authority with respect to
proposals received in this regard
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority constructed and operates a 50 tee golf driving range at the Bruce's Mill
Conservation Area, located in the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York
The facility is located on the south side of Stouffville Sideroad, immediately east of the access
road into the Bruce's Mid Conservation Area, and encompasses approximately 8 1 hectares (20
acres) of land, more or !ess, as identified on the attached plan
During the past season the dnvlng range was open to the general public and operated by the
Authority Additionally, the YMCA of Greater Toronto used the facility as part of their summer
camp offerings at Bruce's Mill Conservation Area.
The faCIlity consists of a 300 yard driving range, a practice green and sand bunker, parking for
52 cars, and a small club house building with office and composting toilet. Recently, staff has
received a number of Inquiries regarding the potential to lease the driving range as a turn-key
operation, with this in mind, staff felt there was merit in issuing a proposal call to determine
whether a lease arrangement for the driving range would be viable
Staff is seeking the direction of thiS Board to initiate the proposal call, and will report back to a
future meeting of the Authority
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Staff will Invite proposals to lease the existing golf driving range operation in the Bruce's Mill
Conservation Area, and will report back to a future meeting of the Authority on submissions
received in this regard
Report prepared by Luch Ognibene, extension 5284
Date October 03, 2000
Attachments 1
175
Attachment 1
" , Attachment 1
w 1 !
c:
t- w ~ ~ !f t
z= ~ {j
~~ 1 ....
~b5 := c @- ~ 1I1lt P J J 0,8 ~
o. i5e~ ~~~
CJ~ ~ ,Q ~ 1 1~ t 1
-~ ro ~ < I IlllfMnf ~t]ll I (!)< E n 11''' ~ n
-I ::J ~U ~ ~ ~~.~g~ ~
-I.c
- u ~ ~ ~ ~ lllll,dllll! ,IUIII, ~>G,~ ~".!i!5
::.E;=: -ll~i~H~c~.3'8~ 1!~
~~ U)CQ;5 . S~~ H~~HjH ~~>~
w_ CJ8 ~ld 1
tJ 0 ~< I~-::!::~ D~ill(5
::l c
c: ;::
[]J 0
t-
I/lctf
-I W
~.o:
o ?5 CO
a.."" --
o ro ,1/...... ...... Q)
c: 2: ')
a.. gJ - ,/ l.-.
c: c '- - ~ - r <:{ j
00 ,/
u..~ ..../-- ~
1--=
1/l::.E ",.;'" -- ...-. c
W en //
::l -w r-"'-'..---- --- 0
ou
W 2 .-
c:co t' +-'
/ CO
W /,/ C:
0: Q)
en
c
0 .
0
-
-
.-
(-',j ~
V---~ - .--
0 ~
:J
s....
, OJ
/
\
, .-t.
/
J
( .
\
'9IorOB",...,cJfi1t '.
.,
\ t'
I I
I \
....-) I ) )
/- ( .------) \ )
, "
.,./ /
176
,
RES #E43/00 - THE FRIENDS OF HEART LAKE
E~tablishment of a Community Group to assist with enhancements to
Ht'::)li Lake Conservation Area
Moved by Linda Pabst
Seconded by John Adams
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the initiation of Friends of Heart
Lake as a community action group be approved,
THAT Friends of Heart Lake be mandated with the tasks of contributing to the celebration
of the conservation area, assisting staff with environmental and public use planning and
implementation efforts, and making sure that the needs of the local community are met,
and that this mandate be incorporated within a formal terms of reference for the group,
THAT the Chair of Friends of Heart Lake be given a seat on the Etobicoke-Mimico Creek
Watersheds Task Force,
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to report back to the Authority through the Public
Use Advisory Board on an annual basis regarding the efforts and community contribution
that Friends of Heart Lake has made to the conservation area
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At meeting #4/00 of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force, the Heart Lake
Shoreline Regeneration project was adopted as a Community Action Site as follows
Res #H24/00- HEART LAKE SHORELINE REGENERATION PROJECT PHASE 1
"THAT the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force adopt the Heart Lake
Shoreline Regeneration Project as a Community Action Site,
THA T community input into the project, particularly future phases be sought in the fall of
2000,
THAT a planting event for Task Force and community members be planned for the fall of
2000 to coincide wIth the Heart Lake festivities tentatively scheduled for October 7 and 8,
2000,
AND FURTHER THAT the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force submit a
$10,000 funding application to FrIends of the Environment FoundatIon (Canada Trust) for
additional funds to complete this project CARRIED"
During the month of JunE::: 2000, Task Force members and TRCA staff conducted four public
open houses At two of these meetings, the Heart Lake Shoreline Regeneration Project was
discussed in detail One recommendation coming from this meeting was that a "Friends of
Heart Lake" community group should be established to contribute to the celebration of the
area, plan for Its future, and make sure that the needs of the local community are met.
177
RA TIONALE
For a number of years, staff at Heart Lake have been working with school groups and Boy
Scouts to Implement plans associated with the on-going Heart Lake Naturalization Areas
proJ ect Initiating Friends of Heart Lake IS viewed as a means of getting the larger community
involved in the celebration and naturalization of the conservation area.
Staff has spent the summer scoping the community need and staff ability to support the group
To date we have received confirmation from over 60 community members that they would be
Interested In becoming a Friend of Heart Lake Much of this interest was expressed at the
recent Heart Lake Fall Fair
In terms of staff support, we have received confirmation from the Assistant Superintendent of
Heart Lake that he would be willing to provide a meeting location and support to this group
once established The Etobicoke-Mlmico Watershed Specialist has confirmed that she will
initiate the group, prOVide assistance regarding the planning of regeneration activities, as
needed, and assist with the generation of funds that will be required to support the group
needs
WORK TO BE DONE
. Establish a formal terms of reference for Friends of Heart Lake based on those established
for other community groups, such as Friends of Altona Forest Included in the terms of
reference will be their mandate, the role and responsibilities of members, staff support,
schedule of meeting dates and reporting relationship to the Etobicoke-Mimico Watershed
T ask Force
. Send out a flyer to the community members who have expressed interest, local councillors,
and the Brampton Guardian, informing them of our planned activities
. Plan a formal launch of the "Friends of Heart Lake" community group
FINANCIAL DETAILS
. Funds for the initiation of Friends of Heart Lake are available in account 118-70
. Funds to support group meetings are proposed in the Etobicoke-Mimlco 2001 budget
. Funds to support environmental regeneration projects within Heart Lake will be proposed
within the Etobicoke-lv1imlco and Conservation Areas budgets on an on-going baSIS,
including the Task Force's Shoreline Regeneration Project and the Conservation Area's
Heart Lake Naturalization Areas project
. Friends of Heart Lake will be charged with the task of raising additional funds to support
these and other projects
For Information contact Beth Williston, 5263
Date October 05, 2000
178
RES #E44/00 - 2l)CJ1 FEE SCHEDULE
Conservation Areas Changes to the 2001 Fee Schedule for Conservation
Areas as outlined below
Moved by Linda Pabst
Seconded by John Adams
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the 2001 Fee Schedule for
Conservation Areas, as proposed, be approved
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Each year staff reviews the TRCA Fee Schedule to determine changes required for the next
operating year Planning for 2001 events at the Toronto and Region Conservation Public
Facilities is well under way Approval of the Fee Schedule will ensure the accuracy of all
printed materials and other promotional items
RA TIONALE
Price Increases are recommended by staff to increase revenues for the Conservation Areas
Changes appear In bold, please refer to the appended Fee Schedule for eXisting relevant
information
Item # Item Description 2000 Gross For 2001
30 For vehicle admission to Petticoat Creek, per day
3 1 on weekends and holidays 900 1000
32 on weekdays 700 800
60 For a permit for the use of a fishing pond at the
Glen Hatty Headwaters Trout Ponds, including
general admission and the use of row boats, per
day,
6 1 on weekends and holidays 250 00 275 00
62 on weel<days 1 50 00 200 00
100 For a pern lit to use a designated group campsite,
subject to a limit of seven nights use, per night,
for a group of 20 people 5000 7500
10 1 for each additional person, in conjunction
with a permit issued under item 10 0 250 250
179
11 0 For each day camper, not overnight, per day,
inclusive of general admission 1 50 1 75
120 For a permit to occupy an individual un-serviced
campsite inclusive of general admission,
12 1 at Albion Hills, per night 1800 2000
at Albion Hills, per week 1 08 00 120 00
122 at Albion Hills, per month (28 days) 360 00 400 00
123 at Albion Hills, per season 965 00 omit
124 at Indian Line, per night 1900 21 00
at Indian Line, per week 11 4 00 126 00
125 at Indian Line, per month (28 days) 380 00 420 00
130 For a permit to occupy an individual serviced
campsite, with water an~hydro hook-ups, inclusive
of general admission,
13 1 at Albion Hills, per night 21 00 2300
at Albion Hills, per week 126 00 138 00
132 at Albion Hills, per month (28 days) 420 00 460 00
133 at Albion Hills, per season 1 337 00 6500
134 at Indian Line, per night 2400 2600
at Indian Line, per week 144 00 156 00
135 at Indian Line, per month (28 days) 480 00 520 00
136 at Indian Line, per season 1 800 00 200000
160 For a permit for the use of a group picnic site at
any Conservation Area exclusive of vehicle or
general admission,
180
16 1 for a group of up to 100 persons at 6000 7500
Heart Lak,~~ Boyd, Petticoat Creek
and Bruce's Mill during Monday to
Saturday
for a group of up to 100 persons n/a 100 00
at Heart Lake, Boyd, Petticoat Creek
and Bruce's Mill on Sunday
for a group of up to 100 persons 6000 6000
at Albion Hills and Glen Hatty during
Monday to Sunday
162 for each additional fifty or fewer persons,
in conjunction with a permit issued under
Item 1 6 1 1500 2500
163 for the use of a picnic shelter with electrical
service, in conjunction with a permit issued
under item 16 1 6000 11 5 00
164 for the use of a picnic shelter without
electrical service, in conjunction with a
permit Issued under item 16 1 5500 9500
240 For a guided tour at Bruce]s Mill during the Maple
Syrup program, subject to a minimum group size of
twenty persons,
24 1 for each student 400 450
242 for each adult fifteen years of age or over 450 500
For parking at the Kortnght Centre for Conservation, per
vehicle, per day, exclusive of general admission] N/A 200
FINANCIAL DETAILS
These changes represent an increase to the revenues for the various locations
For Information contact Garry Misumi, extension 5293
Date October 04, 2000
Attachments 1
181
Attachment 1
TRCA 2000 Fee Schedule Public Facilities and Programming V1 1 99 11 .26
Conservation Areas items 1 to 24
Black Creek Pioneer Village items 25 to 31
Kortright Centre for Conservation Items 32 to 33
Miscellaneous item 34
Discounts items D 1 to D2
The TRCA's 2000 Fee Schedule was approved by the Authority on Friday, November 26, 1999
(Meeting # 11 /1999, Res #A/99) Most fees listed in this Schedule take effect January 1, 2000
Two sets of Kortright School Program fees will be in effect during the 2000 season, the first take
effect January 1, 2000 and the second take effect July 1, 2000 Those fees related to winter
activities ( at Albion Hills) will take effect with the commencement of winter operations late in 1999
Gross fees listed in the Schedule and printed in bold face are those amounts to be quoted to the
public These fees include any applicable federal or provincial taxes Detail is provided as to
actual base fees and related tax amounts
Additional copies of this Fee Schedule may be obtained from Watershed Management /
Conservation Areas This document may be found online as f"\fo\public\fees\feey2k.wpd In
WordPerfect v6 1
Updated material may be distributed from time to time to include supplementary fees which are
related to specific program activities or to reflect changes to the Schedule
Printing history
v1 0 99 1 0 05 original release date
v1 1 99 11 26 First reprinting
Significant changes
Please be sure to review this updated Fee Schedule in its entirety in order to familiarize yourself
with it. Note that several significant changes have been made as follows
. general increase to Maple Syrup school tour rates at Kortright (item 32 6) & Bruce's Mill
(item 24 1)
. removal of Annual passes (Item 40) and Petticoat Creek Pool Passes (item 18 0) in
favour of the Conservation Journeys passports
v1 1 changes
. addition of site specific annual passes (items 4 OJ 33 0 and definition of terms item 2)
. removal of Albion Hills Cross Country Ski passes (item 21 0)
. general Increase to school tour rates at Kortright (items 32 5 & 32 6)
Items for clarification or notice of error or omissions may be directed to I, ext.
182
TRCA 2000 Fee Schedule - Definition of Terms
1 Age categories
Four general age groups are used throughout the fee schedule as follows
Adult - any person from fifteen to sixty-four
Child - any person from five to fourteen
Child (pre-schoolers) - any person four years of age or under
Senior - any person sixty-five years of age or over
Some exceptions to this general categorization apply to specific fee schedule items and are
detailed under those items
2 AnnualPasscawgories
Two passes are offered at the Conservation Areas and Kortright
Individual - any person over five years of age
Family - Maximum two adults, and two children from five to fourteen in one vehicle
3 Conservation Area
The term Conservation Area applies to Albion Hills, Bruce's Mill, 8oyd, Glen Hatty,
Greenwood, H€:clll Lake and Petticoat Creek Also included in this definition are the public
campgrounds at Aibion Hills and Indian Line For the purposes of this fee schedule the
definition does not Include the Kortright Centre for Conservation or Black Creek Pioneer
Village
4 General admission
General admission allows for basic access to a speCified TRCA venue(s) during a
designated operating penod(s) Other fees may be charged in addition to, or in lieu of,
general admission fees for certain facilities programs or operating periods as identified in
this fee schedule or under vanous operating policies
5 Group Camper
Applies to members of an organized group staying overnight at a Conservation Area by
permit
6 Day Camper
Applies to members of day cares, day camps, schools or the like, who are visiting a
Conservation Area during the regular operating day
7 Operating policies
This fee schedule is provided as a general summary of fees applied by the TRCA at it
various operatinrJ Jenues It does not provide, nor is it intended to provide, complete
information as to the various regulations and operating policies in effect at theses venues
which may relate to individual fee schedule items Daily, seasonal and program operating
schedules and minimum group size requirements are among these poliCies
183
8 Discounts and premiums
Any fee may be subject to a discount or premium at the discretion of the appropriate
Manager
9 Supplementary fees
Not all fees are considered to be part of the TRCA's fee schedule as approved by the
Authority Some are set independently of that schedule The sale of retail merchandise or
the provIsion of incidental services represent the most common examples of such fees
TRCA 2000 Fee Schedule - Contents
after-hours use BCPV 280
after-hours use Conservation Areas see late permit (9 0)
Albion Hills farm Albion Hills 340
angling fee Glen Hatty 50
annual pass BCPV 270
see also memberships
annual pass Conservation Areas 40
annual pass Kortnght 330
barbecue / corn pot rental Conservation Areas 166
boat equipment rentals Conservation Areas 80
camping - day campers Conservation Areas 11 0
camping - group campers Conservation Areas 100
camping - group campsite Conservation Areas 100
camping - monthly site Albion Hills 12 2, 13 2
camping - group / Pleasantview Albion Hills 140
camping - public camping Albion Hills, Indian Line 12 0, 13 0, 14 0
camping - seasonal site Albion Hills, Indian Line 12 3, 13 3, 13 5
camping - serviced site Albion Hills Indian Line 130
camping - supplementary fees Albion Hills, Indian Line 150
fees for extra campers and parking for extra cars
camping - unserviced site Albion Hills, Indian Line 12 0
chalet rental Albion Hills, Bruce's Mill 70
canoe rentals Conservation Areas (80)
see boat equip rentals
commercial photography Conservation Areas, Kortright 190
commercial photography BCPV 300
cross-country skiing - equipment rentals Albion Hills 230
cross-country skiing - group rate Albion Hills 23 5, 23 6
cross-country skiing - trail fees / full-day Albion Hills 200
cross-country skiing - trail fees / half-day Albion Hills 21 0
cross-country skiing - seasonal pass Albion Hills 220
day campers Conservation Areas (11 0)
see campers - day campers
Dickson Hill School BCPV 2610
educational tours - BCPV activity program BCPV 26 8, 26 9
educational tours - BCPV tour program BCPV 267
fire permit Conservation Areas 165
184
fishing - cabin rental Glen Haffy Headwaters Trout Ponds 63
fishing - public ponds Glen Hatty 50
fishing - pond rentals Glen Hatty Headwaters Trout Ponds 60
general admission - BCPV BCPV 260
general admission, weekends Conservation Areas 1 0
general admission, weekdays Conservation Areas 20
general admission Kortnght 320
group discounts BCPV, Kortright D 1
guided tour BCPV 31 0
handicapped persons BCPV, Conservation Areas, Kortright D2
late permit Conservation Areas 90
maple syrup tours - student Bruce's Mill 241
maple syrup tours - adult Bruce's Mill 242
memberships BCPV 274
memberships Kortnght 330
parking BCPV 250
parking Albion Hills, Indian Line (15 0)
see camping supplementary fees
pedal boat rentals Conservation Areas (80)
see boat equipment rentals
picnics - additional picnlc~ ers Conservation Areas 162
picnics - picnic shelter Conservation Areas 16 3, 16 4
picnics - picnic site Conservation Areas 160
pool pass Petticoat Creek 180
rowboat rentals Conservation Areas (80)
see boat equipment rentals
skiing (20 0, 21 0, 22 0, 23 0)
see cross country skiing
SWimming - annual pass Petticoat Creek 180
swimming - daily admission Petticoat Creek 170
vehicle admission Petticoat Creek 30
wagon / sleigh rides BCPV 290
Item Description PST GST 2000 2000
8% 7% Base Gross
1 0 For general admission at all
Con~; .:ltvation Areas except
Petticoat Creek, per day, on
weekends and holidays,
1 1 for each adult from fifteen to sixty-four 000 0.26 374 400
years of age
1.2 for each child from five to fourteen 000 013 1 87 200
years of age
185
1 3 for each child four years of age or 000 000 000 000
under
1 4 for each senior sixty-five years of age 000 0.20 280 300
or over
20 For general admission at all
Con"e'Vatlon Areas except Petticoat
Creev, per day, on weekdays,
2 1 for each adult from fifteen to sixty-four 000 0.23 3.27 350
years of age
2.2 for each child from five to fourteen 000 013 1 87 200
years of age
23 for each child four years of age or 000 000 000 000
under
24 for each senior sixty-five years of age 000 016 234 250
or over
30 For vehicle admission to Petticoat
Creek, per day,
3 1 on weekends and holidays 000 059 841 900
3.2 on weekdays 000 046 654 700
33 for a vehicle carrYing more than ten 000 o 13 1 87 200
persons per person
40 For an annual pass valid ONLY for
admiSSion to the Conservation Area for
which It IS purchased
41 For each individual 000 1 31 1869 2000
4.2 For a family of two adults and two 000 1 96 2804 3000
children
50 For fishing at Glen Haffy or Heart Lake,
5 1 per day, for each person fifteen years 000 0.23 3.27 350
of age or over, exclusive of general
admission
186
5.2 per day, for each person from five to 000 007 093 1 00
fourteen years of age, exclusive of
general admission
53 per day, for each person four years of 000 000 000 000
age or under exclusive of general
admission
60 For a permit for the use of a fishing
pond at the Glen Haffy Headwaters
Trout Ponds, including general
admission and the use of row boats,
per day,
6 1 on weekends and holidays 000 1636 233 64 250 00
6,2 on weekdays 000 981 1 40 1 9 150 00
63 for tilE use of the cabin in conjunction 000 5.23 7477 8000
with a permit issued under 6 1 or 6.2
70 For a permit for the use of the chalet
building at Albion Hills or Bruce's Mill,
exclusive of general admission,
7 1 for a half day (four hours) 000 981 1 40 1 9 150 00
7.2 for each additional hour for a youth 000 262 3738 4000
group
73 for each additional hour for other 000 3.27 4673 5000
groups
74 for the use of kitchen facilities, where 000 3.27 4673 5000
available, In conjunction with a permit
Issued under item 7 0
80 For tl-;2 rental of boating equipment 070 061 869 1000
where available per hour'
90 For a permit authonzing a special 000 3.27 4673 5000
event extending past regular operating
hours and up to midnight, exclusive of
parking or general admission, per
hour subject to a three hour minimum
187
100 For a permit to use a designated group
campsite, subject to a limit of seven
nights use per night,
10 1 for each person subject to a minimum 000 o 16 234 250
charge of $50 00
11 0 For each day camper not overnight 000 010 1 40 1 50
per day, inclusive of general
admiSSion
120 For a permit to occupy an individual
un-serviced campSite, inclUSive of
general admission,
12 1 at Albion Hills, per night. 000 1 18 1682 1800
12.2 at Albion Hills, per month (28 days) 000 2355 336 45 360 00
123 at Albion Hills, per season 000 63 13 901 87 965 00
124 at Indian Line, per night 000 1.24 1776 1900
125 at Indian Line, per month (28 days) 000 2486 355 14 380 00
126 on a holiday or other designated date, 000 o 13 1 87 200
in addition to the basIc permit fee
specified in item 12 1 or 12 4
130 For a permit to occupy an IndiVidual
serviced campsite, with water and
hydro hook-ups inclusive of general
admiSSion,
13 1 at Albion Hills, per night 000 1 37 1963 21 00
13.2 at Albion Hills, per month (28 days) 000 2748 392 52 420 00
133 at Albion Hills, per season 000 8750 125000 1337 50
134 at Indian Line, per night 000 1 57 2243 2400
135 at Indian Line, per month (28 days) 000 31 40 448 60 480 00
188
136 at Indian Line, per season 000 117 76 1682.24 1800 00
137 on a holiday or other designated date, 000 013 1 87 200
in addition to the basIc permit fee
specified in item 13 1 or 13 4
140 For a permit to occupy the
Pleasantview group campsite at
Albion Hills, inclusive of general
admission,
14 1 for up to ten camping units, for an 000 11 78 168.22 180 00
adult group
14.2 for each addtional camping unit, in 000 1 18 1682 1800
conjunction with a permit issued to an
adult group under item 141
143 for up to ten camping units, for a 000 981 1 40 1 9 150 00
youth group
144 for each addtlonal camping unit, in 000 098 1402 1500
conjunction with a permit Issued to
youth group under item 143
150 In addition to basIc camping fees as
specified in items 12 0 and 13 0,
15 1 for a permit to park an additional 035 030 435 500
vehicle
15.2 for a permit to park an additional 3 13 274 39 13 4500
vehicle, per season
153 for e::,ch additional person occupying a 000 0.26 374 400
campsite over and above the
carrlpgrDund's specified site limit.
160 For a permit for the use of a group
picnic site at any Conservation Area,
exclusive of vehicle or general
admission, per day,
16 1 for a group of up to 100 persons 000 393 5607 6000
189
16.2 for each additional fifty or fewer 000 098 1402 1500
persons, In conjunction with a permit
Issued under Item 16 1
163 for the use of a picnic shelter with 000 393 5607 6000
electrical service, in conjunction with a
permit Issued under Item 16 1
164 for the use of a picnic shelter without 000 360 51 40 5500
electrical service, In conjunction with a
permit Issued under item 16 1
165 for a permit for a fire In a deSignated 000 393 5607 6000
ground fire pit, in addition to any fees
paid under Item 16 0
166 for the use of a portable barbecue unit 278 243 3479 4000
or corn pot, in addition to any fees paid
under item 160
170 For admission to the sWimming area at
Petticoat Creek, exclusive of vehicle or
general admission,
17 1 per day, for each person five years of 000 013 1 87 200
age or over
17.2 for each child under four years of age 000 000 000 000
173 for a tlook of ten pool passes 000 1 14 1636 1750
180 Petticoat Creek Pool passes have been
replaced by the Conservation Journeys
progam, administered by the Marketing
and Development Department
190 For commercial photography or filming
in any Conservation Area or at the
Kortnght Centre, Including the use of
grounds and environs and supervision,
minimum per hour;
19 1 during normal operating hours 000 4.25 6075 6500
19.2 outSide normal operating hours 000 589 8411 9000
190
200 For the use of cross-country ski trails at
Albion Hills, Inclusive of general
admission,
20 1 for each person fifteen years of age or 000 065 935 10 00
over
20.2 for each child five to fourteen years of 000 033 467 500
age
203 for each child four years of age or 000 000 000 000
under
204 for each senior sixty-five years of age or 000 052 748 800
over
205 for a family of one or two adults and 000 1 64 2336 2500
their children who are fourteen years of
age or under
21 0 For the use of cross-country ski trails at
Albion Hills Inclusive of general
admission, after 1 pm,
21 1 for each person fifteen years of age or 000 052 748 800
over
21.2 for each child five to fourteen years of 000 0.20 280 300
age
21 3 for each child four years of age or 000 000 000 000
under
21 4 for each senior sixty-five years of age or 000 039 561 600
over
220 AlblOi I Hills Cross Country Ski passes
have been replaced by the
Cons ,ovation Journeys progam,
administered by the Marketing and
Development Department.
191
RES #E45/00 - GLEN MAJOR COMPLEX MANAGEMENT PLAN
Terms of Reference Endorsement of the Glen Major Complex
Management Plan Terms of Reference
Moved by Linda Pabst
Seconded by John Adams
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Glen Major Complex
Management Plan Terms of Reference, dated July, 2000, as appended, be endorsed,
AND FURTHER THAT staff continue to assist the Advisory Committee, which includes
members of the public, interested community groups, local and regional councillors and
agency staff, as outlined in the Terms of Reference, to develop the Glen Major Complex
Management Plan
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Glen Major Complex planning area, which has included the Goodwood Resource
Management Tract, Secord Forest and Wildlife Area, Clubine Agreement Forest, Walker Woods
Tract, Former Timbers Brothers Gravel Pit, Glen Major Resource Management Tract and
Claremont field Centre lands, totals 1950 hectares of land The Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) owns all of the land within the Glen Major Complex area, with
the exception of 72 hectares In the Glen Major Resource Management Tract, which is owned
by the Ontario Heritage Foundation and managed by the TRCA
At Authority Meeting #7/98, held on September 24, 1999, Resolution #A246/99 was adopted
"THA T staff be directed to proceed with the development of a Glen Major Complex
Management Plan
AND FURTHER THA T staff be directed to establish an Advisory Committee, which would
include member:; cf the public, Interested community groups, the TownshIp of Uxbndge
Town of Pickering, and Durham Region to assist with the development of the
Management Plan and facilitate the opportunity for publIc input. J'
The objective of the Glen Major Complex Management Plan process, as outlined in the Terms
of Reference, will be to involve the community and work cooperatively toward examining the
lands and determining their environmental features and functions, heritage values, and their
potential for appropriate recreation or other public uses The management plan will be
integrated with the Duffins and Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy to establish a
comprehensive plan for the management of specific TRCA owned properties, recommend
important land stewardship practices and identify important linkages between TRCA properties
Representatives from the following agencies and community groups have been Invited to
participate on the Glen Major Complex Management Plan Advisory Committee
. Ministry of Natural Resources, Aurora District - Staff,
. Ministry of Citizenship, Culture and Tourism - Staff,
. Durham Region, City of Pickering, Township of Uxbridge - Staff and Councillors,
192
. Durham Region Pol,\:~ - Staff,
. Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority - Staff,
. Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority - Staff,
. Ontario Heritage Foundation - Staff,
. Federation of Ontario Naturalists,
. Hike Ontario,
. Ontario Trails Council,
. Oak Ridges Moraine Trail Association,
. Uxbridge Cycling Association,
. Uxbndge Citizens for Conservation,
. Uxbridge Conservation Association,
. Pickering Conservation Association,
. Pickering Rural Association,
. Walker Property,
. Secord Property,
. The Glen Major Angling Club,
. Goodwood Farms,
. Dagmar Ski Resort
. International Mountain Biking Association (Ontario Chapter)
Specific responsibilities uf ~he Glen Major Complex Advisory Committee will be a follows
(a) Provide Technical expertise, monitoring information and advice to the TRCA throughout
the development of the Management Plan,
(b) Ensure that appropriate staff and members at their respective municipalities/agencies/
associations are adequately informed throughout the process,
(c) Provide comment and input to suggestions brought to the Advisory Committee,
(d) Assist in the identification of current outstanding Issues involving the Glen Major
Complex area and make suggestions as to appropriate ways of resolving them,
(e) Assist the TRCA in presentations and public forums, where appropriate, and
(f) Assist the TRCA with the implementation and maintenance of the management plan
The Management Plan will be undertaken in five phases The first phase initially establishes
general management zunes for all the properties Detailed site specific, recommendations will
be developed in phase 2 through phase 4, based on priority areas In phase 5 the priority
areas and the Duffins ctr',- Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy will be fully integrated
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
TRCA staff, working with the Advisory Committee, will
. determine general management zones for all seven properties,
. determine detailed management zone recommendations for all priority areas,
. integrate priority areas, management recommendations and the Duffins Creek Watershed
Strategy,
193
. host public meetings and Incorporate public input, and
. present the management plan to the Authonty for approval
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for the development of the Glen Major Complex Management Plan has been included
in the Conservation Land Planning budget under Account No 408-96 For Information
contact Mike Bender, extension 5287
Date September 22, 2000
Attachments 1
194
Attachment 1
GLEN MAJOR COMPLEX MANAGEMENT PLAN
TERMS OF REFERENCE
DRAFT
July 2000
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
195
1 0 INTRODUCTION
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has Initiated the preparation of a
comprehensive management plan for the Glen Major Complex area. At meeting #9/99 held
on September 24, 1999, the TRCA approved the process for prepanng a management plan for
the seven properties which comprise the Glen Major Complex, Resolution #A246/99
"THA T staff be directed to proceed with the development of a Glen Major Complex
Management Pla.n,
AND FURTHER THA T staff be directed to establish an AdvIsory Committee, whIch would
include members of the public, interested community groups, the Township of Uxbridge,
Town of Pickering, and Durham Region to assIst wIth the development of the plan and
facilitate the opportunity for public input."
The management plan will include a description and evaluation of the properties based on
relevant plans and policies, landscape features and functions, environmental constraints and
opportunities The Plan will identify specific management zones within which a certain type of
activity may be undertaken For example, within a Natural Environment Zone, habitat creation
work may occur, within a Public Use Zone, passive recreation activities may be recommended
The Plan will proVide a framework for the TRCA to determine priorities for future initiatives
including the protection of natural features and habitat regeneration The Management Plan
will also determine the ecological appropriateness of any proposed public use and ensure that
the integnty and diversity of the area are maintained
The Mission Statement for the TRCA states that with one-third of Ontario's population within its
area of junsdiction, the ,L\uthority acts in the community's interest through advocating and
Implementing watershed management programs that
. maintain and Improve tile quality of the region s lands and waters,
. contribute to public safety from flooding and erosion,
. provide for the acquisition of conservation and hazard lands, and
. enhance the quality and variety of life in the community by using its lands for Inter-regional
outdoor recreation, heritage preservation and conservation education
A key component In the planning and management of the Glen Major Complex properties IS
the interrelationship between them and the Duffins Creek watershed, the Oak Ridges Moraine,
and other natural and cultural features The TRCA initiated the preparation of the Duffins and
Carruthers Creek watershed strategy in 2000, to set out policies, actions, criteria and
stewardship Initiatives that will help with proactive management of the significant resources In
the watersheds The management plan will be integrated with the Duffins and Carruthers Creek
watershed strategy and promote where possible, linkages and connections with other
greenways and natural features
Planning efforts have shown that Interest and community groups have grown more concerned
with the impact of land use change on the remaining natural landscapes within the GT A. At the
same time, user groups, businesses and municipalities have expressed a growing interest In
uSing public lands for a \ anety of outdoor recreation, ecological restoration and other activities
The provision of public uses on TRCA land must consider economic factors (i e ,budgets,
196
expenditures, benefits), ! 'I'j needs of the community and the needs of the natural landscape to
ensure it IS protected and managed properly The management plan will strive for the full
support of all levels of government, and will seek the commitment of the community and
volunteer organizations to establish relationships and work cooperatively In the development
and implementation of the management plan
20 PLANNING AREA
For the purpose of this project, the Glen Major Complex area will include the Goodwood
Resource Management Tract, Secord Forest and Wildlife Area, Clubine Agreement Forest,
Walker Woods Tract, Former Timbers Brothers Gravel Pit, Glen Major Resource Management
Tract and Claremont Field Centre lands The TRCA owns all of the land within the Glen Major
Complex area, with the exception of 72 hectares in the Glen Major Resource Management
Tract, which is owned by the Ontario Heritage Foundation and managed by the TRCA. The
entire planning area of the Glen Major Complex totals 1950 hectares, with the individual
property totals listed below
PROPERTY AREA
Goodwood Resource Management Tract 110 hectares
Secord Forest and Wildli'i0 Area 93 hectares
Clubine Agreement Forest 38 hectares
Walker Woods Tract 429 hectares
Glen Major Resource Management Tract 1081 hectares
Former Timber Brother Gravel Pit 38 hectares
Claremont Field Centre 161 hectares
The properties are located within the Duffins Creek watershed Five of the seven properties are
located completely within the Township of Uxbridge A small portion at the south end of the
Glen Major Resource Management Tract and the entire Claremont Field Centre are located in
the City of Pickering (Map 1) The TRCA owns and/or manages all of the properties within the
Glen Major Complex as listed above Although the property boundaries are clearly defined, the
management plan will identify and promote where possible, important linkages and
connections between the properties and with other greenways and natural features
3 0 OBJECTIVE
The objective of the Glen Major Complex Management Plan process will be to involve the
community and work c':.'operatively toward examining the lands and dei:E',mining their
environmental features and functions, heritage values, and their potential for appropnate
recreation or other public. uses The management plan will be integrated with the Duffins and
Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy to establish a comprehensive plan for the management
of specific TRCA owned properties, recommend important land stewardship practices and
Identify Important linkages between TRCA properties
40 MANAGEMENT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Representatives from the following agencies and community groups have been invited to
participate on the Glen Major Complex Management Plan Advisory Committee
197
0 Ministry of Natural Resources, Aurora District - Staff,
. Ministry of Citizenship, Culture & Tourism - Staff,
. Durham Region, City of Pickering, Township of Uxbridge - Councillors,
. Durham Region Police - Staff,
. Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority - Staff,
. Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority - Staff;
. Ontano Heritage Foundation - Staff,
. Federation of Ontario Naturalists,
. Hike Ontano,
. Ontario Trails Counci ,
. Oak Ridges MoraineTrail Association,
. Uxbndge Cycling ASSOCiation,
. Uxbridge Citizens for Conservation,
. Uxbndge Conservation Association,
. Pickering Conservation Association,
. Pickering Rural Association,
. Walker Property,
. Secord Property,
. The Glen Major Angling Club,
. Goodwood Farms,
. Dagmar Ski Resort,
. International Mountain Biking Association (Ontario Chapter)
The Advisory Committee will assist the TRCA staff to finalize the project Terms of Reference,
and determine the management zones and management recommendations This Committee
provides technical input and will assist the Authority with the public consultation program
regarding the Management Plan
In summary the Advisory Committee will be responsible for the following major functions
1 Provide technical expertise, monitoring information and advice to the TRCA throughout
the development of the Management Plan,
2 Ensure that appropriate staff and members at their respective municipalitles/ agencies/
aSSOCiations are adequately Informed throughout the process,
3 ProVide comment and Input to suggestions brought to the Advisory Committee,
4 Assist in the identification of current outstanding issues involving the Glen Major
Complex
area and make suggestions as to appropriate ways of resolving them,
5 Assist the TRCA in presentations and publiC forums, where appropriate,
6 Assist the TRCA with the implementation and maintenance of the management plan
The Advisory Committee will follow the Rules of Conduct of the Authority as adopted by
Resolution #3 of Authority meeting #2/86 or as may be amended
All issues will be resolved through agreement by consensus of the Advisory Committee,
however, If an issue cannot be resolved, there will be a majority vote taken
198
50 PLANNING PROCESS
The Management Plan will be undertaken in five phases The first phase initially establishes
general management zones for all the properties Detailed site specific recommendations will
be developed in phase 2 through phase 4, based on priority areas In phase 5 the priority
areas and the Duffins and Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy will be fully Integrated
The Advisory Committee will be established in Phase 1 to assist TRCA staff with development
of a vision statement for the plan, finalize the project Terms of Reference, develop
management zones and recommendations, and to help facilitate public input
PHASES
Phase 1 (TRCA Staff)
1 Prepare a reference document that provides the following information
. Review existing plans and studies within the Glen Major Complex, and the Duffins
Creek watershed,
. Document existing and proposed land use, municipal services, road classifications
and property ownership,
. Describe the current public uses and types of recreation activities occurring in the
Glen Major Complex and surrounding communities, and
. Define the natural, cultural, heritage, recreation and education resource Identify any
information deficiencies that may exist.
2 Establish Advisory Committee
Phase 1 (TRCA Staff with assistance from the Advisory Committee)
3 Develop Project Terms of Reference
4 Develop Plan Vision
5 Host Public Information Session
6 Determine Draft General Management Zones such as, Nature Reserve, Natural
Environment,
Primary Restoration, Heritage Preserve, Public Use, for all TRCA Study Properties
7 Determine Draft Trans Canada Trail (TCT) Alignment
8 Public Meeting to Review Draft General Management Zones and TCT Alignment
9 Finalize General Management Zones
Phase 2 (TRCA staff wit!- essistance from the AdvIsory Committee)
1 Determine Detailbd Management Zone Recommendations for Priority Area One
. Glen Major Resource Management Tract,
. Walker Woods,
. Former Timbers Brothers Gravel Pit.
2 Host Public Meeting to Review Draft Management Zone Recommendations
3 Finalize Priority Area One Management Zone Recommendations
199
Phase 3 (TRCA staff with assistance from the Advisory Committee)
1 Determine Detailed Management Zone Recommendations for Priority Area Two
Claremont
2 Host Public Meeting to Review Draft Management Zone Recommendations
3 Finalize Priority Area Two Management Zone Recommendations
Phase 4 (TRCA staff With assistance from the Advisory Committee)
1 Determine Detailed Management Zone Recommendations for Priority Area Three
Goodwood Resource Management Tract,
Secord Forest and Wildlife Area,
Clubine Agreement Forest.
2 Host PubliC Meeting to Review Draft Management Zone Recommendations
3 Finalize Pnority Area Three Management Zone Recommendations
Phase 5 (TRCA staff with assistance from the Advisory Committee)
1 Integrate Priority Areas and Management Recommendations
2 Link Management Plan to Duffins Creek Watershed Strategy
. Integrate Management Recommendations,
. Linked Resource Protection & Restoration,
. Balanced Public Use,
. TRCA/ Municlpal/ Private Land Stewardship,
. Potential TRCA Property Acquisition/Conservation Easements
3 Final Public Meeting to Present Integrated Management Plan
4 Advisory Committee Endorsement of Management Plan
5 Management Plan Review with Other Government Agencies
6 Authority Approvsl of Management Plan
60 TIMING
It IS anticipated that Glen Major Complex Management Plan will be presented to the Authority
for approval of the management plan in December 2001
200
MANAGEMENT PLAN TIMELlNE
PHASES Jan Oct Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan
2000 2000 2001 I 2002
Draft General
Phase 1 Mgt. Zones &
Trans Can
Trail Alignment
Mgt Zones
Phase 2 Recommend-
ations PriOrity
Area One
Mgt Zones
I Phase 3 Recommendations
I Pnoil:y ,;,rea Two
I
Mgt.Zone Recommendations PriOrity Area
Phase 4 Three
Consolidate PriOrity
Phase 5 Areas! Management
Recommendations
and Integrate Plan
with Duffins Strategy
201
70 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The eventual development and use of the Glen Major Complex will be important to area
residents and consequently, they must have a meaningful way to provide input to the planning
process To facilitate a wide range of opportunities for input, the Authority will use many
techniques to generate :.:":. high level of awareness
The public participation component will Include the following
. Presentation or discussion with key interest groups (i e , Federation of Ontario Naturalists,
ratepayer groups), upon request. This list will be expanded through local municipal
planning department and Advisory Committee Input.
. Information sessions and mailings to the public, including community uS.er groups will be
incorporated to Identify a broad range of potential needs and opportunities for the area.
. Public meetings will be held to present the background information, proposed
management zones and Advisory Committee recommendations
. There will be an opportunity for public participation at all Authority meetings
80 GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES
The principles and objectives, which are outlined below, are based on an integrated ecosystem
approach to watershed management The majority of the study properties are located on the
Oak Ridges Moraine and at the headwaters of the Duffins Creek, therefore the Glen Major
Complex Management Plan should incorporate some of the principles, objectives and actions
to protect, enhance ,and Improve the Duffins Creek watershed health
202
GUIDING PRINCIPLES EXAMPLES OF OBJECTIVES AND ACTIONS OF A
MANAGEMENT PLAN
Preserve, regenerate and . All activities and future development should work with
celebrate our natural, natural processes to contribute to environmental health
historical and cultural . Ensure appropriate land uses for the natural processes and
heritage. features of the planning area
. Include goals and strategies for wildlife
. Include goals and strategies for protection, restoration and
enhancement of natural features/ functions
. Locate development away from areas that are subject to
risks from natural hazards (ie, risks associated with flooding
and erosion)
Establish linkages and . Land uses will be managed through broad partnerships
promote partnerships which consider local, regional and inter-regional needs
among communities . Develop and foster partnerships between heritage
organizations, environmental groups and the development
industry
. Support a mix of public and private uses that permit public
access, use and enjoyment of the area
. Encourage action initiatives by community groups
. Promote greater year-round access and use
. Restore and maintain connections with natural and cultural
heritage features (ie wildlife habitats and communities)
. Reconnect woodland habitats to facilitate movement and
recolonization by flora and fauna
. Interregional trail development
Protect the Duffins . Minimize the amount of impervious surfaces
Watershed as a . Restore natural stream processes, where necessary
continuing source of . Control and treat runoff by employing stormwater best
clean water management practices
. Protect and enhance wetlands
203
Build a strong watersin~d . The use of Authority lands will be financially sustainable
economy based on . Provide opportunities for efficient use of limited government
ecological health and private sectors resources
. Ensure planning decisions are based on an evaluation of the
amenity and ecological value of the resource, as well as the
associated dollar costs and benefits
. Integration where possible, of social, environmental, and
economic objectives (ie Coordination of activities and
sharing resources, multiple benefits)
. Use full cost accounting methods to ensure that long term
environmental and economic costs are included (i e ,
environmental protection at outset may reduce the need for
environmental rehabilitation later, thus, improving long term
affordability and sustainabillty)
. Provide public use opportunities for all income groups
Promote the watershed as . People should be able to access, and enjoy the area on foot
a destination of choice for or by bicycle, with improvements made where feasible to
recreation and tourism overcome the barriers presented
. The Authority will endeavour to make land available,
recognizing and being sensitive to, the diversity of the
community
. Design should include a range of landscape types
. Maintain existing vistas and views, density and design of
structures should not be permitted when it creates visual
barriers to the natural beauty of the area
. The focus for public use will be on outdoor recreation and
outdoor education
. The area should provide diverse landscapes, places, wildlife
habitats, uses, programs, and experiences
. Provide a balanced mix of public uses, developed and
natural areas, large and small scale, and free and user pay
activities
Increase community . Promote partnerships among environmental, cultural
stewardship and take heritage, recreation and education organizations, private
individual responsibility industry and public agencies
for the health of the . Encourage action-oriented initiatives to protect, conserve
o uffi ns and regenerate Glen Major complex and the Duffins Creek
watershed
90 MAINTENANCE OF THE PLAN
The Glen Major Complex Management Plan will undergo a review approximately every five
years If major revisions are necessary to reflect changing environmental, social, or economic
conditions, it will only be done after consultation with all affected groups and individuals
RevIsions of the Plan will be in keeping with the original stated goals and objectives of the Plan
to protect the natural heritage values of the property
204
Should the Management Plan identify potential public use zones, specific uses within these
areas will be screened and assessed according to The Strategy for Public Use of ConservatIon
Authority Lands (1995) A community consultation process will also be employed at this stage
of planning to ensure that all local and regional interests are represented in the concept and
detailed design review The consultative process will include the establishment of a working
group with representatives from citizens, user groups, agencies, and elected representatives
The screening process for specific public uses will ensure that all proposed uses, facilities and
landscape changes will be thoroughly examined and designed to minimize disruption, and to
protect, enhance or restore the area.
205
RES #E46/00 - "Earth Rangers" PROPOSAL - KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR
CDNSERVATION
CFN 31514 Proposal to lease lands at the Kortnght Centre for
Conservation and develop a world-class wildlife veterinary and
rehabilitation centre by the "Earth Rangers"
Moved by Maria Augimeri
Seconded by Frank Scarpltti
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to prepare a
draft lease with the "Earth Rangers" regarding Authority-owned lands within the Kortright
Centre for Conservation, Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, Regional
Municipality of York,
AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the December 1,2000 meeting of the
Public Use Advisory Board recommending further action
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
"Earth Rangers", a program developed by the Schad Foundation, has expressed an interest in
developing a world-class wildlife veterinary and rehabilitation centre at the Kortright Centre for
Conservation as a base h- an environmental education outreach program The Centre would
encompass approximately 10 hectares (25 acres) of land, and would include a main building of
0
approximately 1,900 m- (20,000 square feet) which would house the veterinary facility,
rehabilitation areas, educational facilities and offices associated with this proposal
Additionally, the Centre would include outdoor rehabilitation areas, aviaries and cages
dispersed throughout the property
Authonty staff have met on several occasions with representatives from "Earth Rangers" to
scope out this proposal and discuss an appropriate location of such a facility within Kortright
attached is a plan which schematically identifies the preferred location The preferred location
IS situated on the south side of the main entrance road to Kortright, in the general vicinity of the
former sawmill Portions of the site are open field areas, although it is flanked by valley and
stream corridors on both the east and west boundaries The "Earth Rangers" have identified
that the pnnciple development of the facility would be contained on the table lands contiguous
to the main road in the vicinity of the sawmill, with the balance of their rehabilitation pens and
aviaries distributed throughout the site The development of this facility would entail
considerable capital expenditures by "Earth Rangers", and in turn they are seeking a long-term
lease arrangement for these lands
Opportunities to integrate the program offerings associated with this proposal and the
Authonty's programs at f<'( rtright are being explored The "Earth Rangers" program is seen as
complimentary to our eXlst.ing facilities and programs This development will be one
component of the broader expansion of the Centre for Sustainable Living as outlined in the
Living City Campaign
206
RA TIONALE
The Authority currently maintains a license agreement with Wildcare Wildlife Rehabilitation
Centre (Ontario) on its lands at Kortnght. The "Earth Rangers" proposal would incorporate and
expand upon the work currently being done by this group, and a partnership would be formed
between these two parties and the Authority
The Kortright Centre is assisting "Earth Rangers" in developing a pilot multimedia assembly
presentation to teach young people about the impact of human action on the environment and
to inspire them to become actively involved in environmental conservation and protection The
assembly program will include non-releasable, native wild animals to promote an empathetic
response and elicit a readiness for environmental action The pilot program will consist of 30
presentations to school groups (grade 6 and 7) Implemented between August and December
of 2000, the first assembly presentation will be offered in November
The lands identified for this potential use have been identified through the Boyd North and
Glasco Park Management Plan as Public Use/Moderate-High and Primary Restoration The
principle development of the facility which would house this proposal would be contained
predominantly within the Public Use area, with the rehabilitation pens and aviaries situated
within the Primary Restoration areas The pens and aviaries would be designed such that they
are integrated into the landscape, and will include restoration and enhancement of these areas
Staff are of the opinion that the "Earth Rangers" proposal, in-principle, is in keeping with the
Boyd North and Glasco Park Management Plan, as well as the overall program and policy
Interests of the Authority Initial consultation has taken place with our municipal counterparts
who are supportive of thiS proposal at Kortright It appears that the proposal is compatible with
the existing zoning for the site Further consultation with the Boyd North and Glasco Park
Management Plan Community Stewardship Committee will be sought prior to staff reporting
back to the Authority
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Authority staff will continue discussions with the "Earth Rangers" to develop a draft lease for
the subject lands, and wili undertake further investigations regarding the suitability of these
lands for this purpose Staff will also consult with the Boyd North and Glasco Park
Management Plan Community Stewardship Committee and seek their input regarding this
proposal A further report detailing staff's findings in this regard, in addition to any terms and
conditions of a lease arrangement, will be brought forward to a future meeting of the Authority
A formal request will be sent to the Environment Ministry to determine whether this proposal is
exempt from an Environmental Assessment requirement The Authority is also preparing an
issues scoping report as background information and an archaeological assessment on the
site is underway Development of the education program involving wildlife assemblies will
continue in parallel to the lease development
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Authority staff have identified preliminary costs associated with the review of this proposal,
including survey work, legal costs, appraisal work and an archaeological investigation "Earth
Rangers" have agreed to pay these costs, and have advanced funds to the Authority for this
purpose These costs are approximately $20,000
207
The costs related to the development, presentation and evaluation of the 30 pilot assemblies
will be paid by "Earth Rangers" These costs total approximately $50 000 A substantial
contnbution by the Schad Foundation towards major improvements to the Kortright facilities
and programs will be negotiated as part of the lease
Report Prepared by Luch Ognibene, extension 5284
Date October 12, 2000
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11 47 a.m , on October 13, 2000
Dick 0' Brien Craig Mather
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/ks
208
~
V THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #6/00
December 1, 2000
The Public Use Advisory Board Meeting #6/00, was held in the Humber Room, Head
Office, on Friday, December 1,2000 The Chair Donna Patterson, called the meeting to
order at 11 30 a m
PRESENT
John Adams Member
Maria Augimeri Member
Michael Oi Biase Member
Doug Dickerson Vice Chair
Dick O'Brien Chair, Authority
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
Donna Patterson Chair
REGRETS
Linda Pabst Member
Frank Scarpitti Member
RES #E47/00- MINUTES
Moved by Dick O'Brien
Seconded by Maria Augimeri
THA T the Minutes of Meeting #5/00, held on October 13, 2000, be approved
CARRIED
209
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES #E48/00- BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE
Master Plan Design and Implementation, 2001 Business Plan
Presentation of the Infrastructure Master Plan for Black Creek Pioneer
Village and the draft Business Plan for 2001 to 2005
Moved by Maria Augimeri
Seconded by Doug Dickerson
THA T the report dated November 23,2000, advising of a presentation on the Black Creek
Pioneer Village Infrastructure Master Plan and 2001 Business Plan be received
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
On November 26th, 1999, the Authority approved Resolution #A308/99 adopting a new
mission statement for Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV), and directing staff to proceed to
implement the recommendations of Black Creek Pioneer Village Future Directions Strategy
Project Also, staff were directed to include in the budget submission to the City of Toronto,
the capital budget request to implement the plan
The City of Toronto approved in 2000 $1 million for the BCPV New Attractions Development
Project and $600,000 for the BCPV Restoration Project. The City also agreed to give
consideration to the 5 year capital budget plan totaling $6 million
In spring 2000, with the approval of the budget, staff created an internal team to guide the two
projects and engaged the services of a consulting team to provide architectural, design and
other technical support to implement the infrastructure projects The BCPV Strategy Team has
continued to meet to implement the program and operational elements of the future directions
strategy
RATIONALE
At the meeting on December 1 st, staff will be making a presentation to the Public Use Advisory
Board on the work to date including
~ design plans for the new Events Pavilion
. master plan for future development of Black Creek Pioneer Village
. status report on implementation of the recommendations of the Future Directions Strategy
. draft report on the BCPV Business Plan 2001 to 2005
This will take about one hourso this will be the only item for the Public Use Advisory Board It
is, however, an important opportunity for the Board to consider major changes which will take
place at the Village over the next four to five years Representatives of the consulting team will
be in attendance
210
I hope as many members of the Advisory Board as possible can be in attendance for this
important presentation
Report prepared by Jim Dillane, extension 6292
Date November 23, 2000
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12 27 pm, on December 1, 2000
Donna Patterson J Craig Mather
Chair Chief Administrative Officer
/ks
211