HomeMy WebLinkAboutExecutive Committee 1996
~
, the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #1/96 Page B 1
March 8, 1996
The Executive Committee met in the Humber Room at the Authority Head Office, 5 Shoreham
Drive, Downsview, on Friday, March 8, 1996. The Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to
order at 8:30 a.m.
PRESENT
Michael Di Biase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Lois Griffin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Lois Hancey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice Chair, Authority
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Joan King ........................................................ Member
Richard O'Brien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair, Authority
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard Whitehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
RES. #E1/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the Minutes of Meetings #12/95, #13/95 be approved. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
DELEGATIONS
(a) Mr. Lou Pontili, representing the Franciscian Fathers spoke in support of the sale of surplus
Authority lands.
(bl Mr. Bryce Taylor, a citizen of Woodbridge, Ontario, who is also the private operator of a
private school in Woodbridge, spoke in support of the sale of surplus Authority lands.
RES. #E2/96 - DELEGATIONS
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT the above noted delegations be received. .......................... CARRIED
B2 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
CORRESPONDENCE
(al A letter from Mr. Jim Streb, President of the York University Staff Association, stating his
opposition re: decisions of the MTRCA to sell or lease Authority-owned lands.
(bl A letter from Father John Iverinci of St. Margaret Mary Roman Catholic Church, Kleinburg,
Ontario, in support of the sale of surplus Authority lands.
(c) A letter from Mr. Paul Marchesini, 17 John Kline Lane, Kleinburg, Ontario, in support of the
sale of surplus Authority lands.
RES. #E3/96 - CORRESPONDENCE
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the above items of correspondence be received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
RES. #E4/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1996-2000
Flood Plain and Conservation Component
Humber River Watershed
Rologia Developments Inc.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Joan King
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.58 acres, more or less, be purchased from
Rologia Developments Inc., said land consisting of a irregular shaped parcel of land being Part of
Lot 13, Concession 8, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00 plus vendor's reasonable legal and survey costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located north of Langstaff Road, east of Highway #27, in the City of
Vaughan, under the "Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1996-2000" Flood Plain and
Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B3
BACKGROUND
Resolution #131/95, Authority Meeting #4/95, May 26, 1995 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. David Drake of EMC Group Limited representing the
owners.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed this proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
A plan illustrating the specific location is attached.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
Based on realty taxes paid on other Authority lands at this location, it is estimated that the realty
taxes will be $400. per year. Authority staff maintain the lands in this area and the addition of this
property will not have any significant impact on maintenance costs.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004-11-502 - Flood Control Hazard Account.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, extension 223
. t
-
"-
B4 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
I (' I'
. .,'
. "
~' ~
-
-
Z
~
...
: -
.
:>-
Eo-
-
. ., == ~
... . 0 L
~ I' _ ~
. -
: ~
: ~
~ ..- ~c,
- "
'I':
',-
~I"
,,-
,-,
~ ,-:
/.-'
~. _\
... .,. 'I";
~. , 1~'lo
lJ) ., \ I ~ I
':, ~
,.. ,
} /\:
:&. ,,-:'
: ...,'-
0, ''''11'
) ~I
... ; :"....1
. '....1-
- / :~-~
- ,
~~ .0
: .
~ ~
) . . r
j . /;,- ~
- . . . .
,
.....
. .
.: I. ·
I.. -- .
.
i
-.
.
;
..
8
.
.
. : 'I III '''We
... }- ..'G...."
I I 9 .,
-~ --.'
~-,~
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B5
RES #E5/96 - RECOGNmON AND EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AWARDS SUB-COMMITTEE
Appointments for 1996
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Recognition and Employee Suggestion
Awards Sub-Convnittee for 1996 consist of Lois Hancey (Chair), Patrick Abtan and Donna Patterson.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Member appointments.
BACKGROUND
In 1992, the Recognition and Employee Suggestion Awards sub-committees were amalgamated. The
purpose of the Recognition and Employee Suggestion Awards sub-committee is to recommend or
update policies with respect to the Recognition and Employee Suggestion Awards; to solicit
nominations/applications for the awards; and selecting and recommending suitable candidates for the
consideration and approval of the Executive Committee.
In 1993, by Res. #E67/93, it was agreed that the Employee Suggestion Award component would "be
deferred, sine die" (i.e., for an indefinite periodl. The principal task of the sub-committee is to review
submissions and recommend recipients for Honour Roll recognition by the Authority at its annual Arbor
Day, this year on April 26.
Lois Hancey, Patrick Abtan and Donna Paterson have indicated their interest in continuing to serve on
the sub-committee.
For information contact:
Alyson Deans, extension 269.
B6 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
RES. #E6/96 - PROJECT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE ALTONA FOREST ENVIRONMENTAL
SIGNIFICANT AREA - DR. J. MURRAY SPEIRS PROPERTY AND ALTONA FOREST
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Page 3 of the Altona Forest Environmental
Management Plan as approved by the Members of the Authority on June 23, 1995, be amended
to include the wording set out on the attached Schedule n An;
AND FURTHER THAT appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever
action is required, to arrange for completion of the Dr. J. Murray Speirs acquisition. . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Minor wording clarification to the Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan, to accommodate
completion of the acquisition of the Dr. J. Murray Speirs Property through donation.
BACKGROUND
Copies of Authority resolutions #A231/95 and #A 160/95, together with copy of Page 3 of the
Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan approved on June 23, 1995 are appended;
While agreement in principle by Dr. J. Murray Speirs to donate a 2.8 hectare portion of his property
was obtained last fall, the transaction could not formally be completed until the Provincial
Government granted approval. A copy of Order-in-Council #268/96, approved and ordered by the
Provincial Government on February 14, 1996, has now been received. In the process of arranging
for completion of final documentation, the solicitors for Dr. J. Murray Speirs have requested the
minor word changes as set out on !M amended Page 3 of the Altona Forest Environmental
Management Plan, appended as SC'l9cule "A". The Authority solicitor is in the process of getting
final documentation executed and IS proposed to close this matter prior to the end of March
Report prepared by:
Don Prince Ext. #221
, 1 -
B7
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
Page 3
Schedule "A"
lOOn his own hUtiativc, Dr. I. Mwray Speirs, one ot Omario's foremost field Ornithologists,
proposed tbat he donate appmxima%c1y 2.8 hectares of his laud to the Authority to be included
.. pan of a larger Ecological Reserve within the Alfons Forest Propcny. The I. Munay Speirs
EcologicU Reserve would form a vital CDlDpcmc:nt of the Altona Forest ecosystem.
It is undcmood tbat such an Ecological ICSc1Vc would be 12 hectares in size. It would
incorporate the land to be donared by Dr. SpciJ's' aDd the DiNardo land imo the Altena Forest
Pro~ty, including a small pond loc:atcd on the aistiDg Spcia and DiNardo propcny Unc. These
new acqulsUioDS would be included lIS part of the Alroua Forest Environmc:nra1 Management
PIau. Dr. Speirs' contnDutions and vision of the pro~t:ics as an Ecological Reserve has been
recognized by naming the Ecological R=czve in his honour.
It is understood that a thirty metre grid Will be nCQ!SSary to undertake investigative studies on
bird communities and forest understorcy widW:J the I 2hcctarc Ecological n:servc. The Authority
will establish the thirty metre grid for rcsearc:h ptUpOscs. The Authority will COOperate with
adjacent landowners, the community and other agencies including natural heritage groups to
maintain the grid system tor the studies.
As of March 1996, the Ecological Rcsertc consists of Parts Z to 11 inclusive on Plan 4OR-16S68
as illustrated on the following page."
. z
.-
" ..t EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
B8
,
"
,
J AL TONA FOREST
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION
CONSERV A TION AUTHORITY
JUNE 23, 1995
, t
.-
B9
EXECUTIVE COMMiTTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
- . It has been proposed by Dr. J. Murray Speirs. one of Ontario's foremost field
~: omithologists. that he would donate approximately 2.8 hectares of his land to the ,..
: .:-:'
..- .' Authority to be included as part of a larger Ecological Reserve within the Altona
Forest Property. Dr. Speirs would retain the balance of his property for his own
use. The J. Murray Speirs Ecological Reserve would form a vital component of the
Altona Forest ecosystem.
It is understood that such an Ecological Reserve would be approximately ten
hectares in size. It would incorporate the land to be donated by Dr. Speirs's and .
the DiNardo land into the Altona Forest Property, including a small pond located on
the existing Speirs and DiNardo property line. These new acquisitions would be
included as part of the Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan. Dr. Speirs's
contributions and vision of the properties as an Ecological Reserve would be
recognized by naming the Ecological Reserve in his honour.
It is understood that a thirty metre grid will be necessary to undertake investigatIve
studies on bird communities and forest understorey withIn the ten hectare
Ecological Reserve. The Authority will establish the thirty metre grid for research
purposes. The Authority will cooperate with adjacent landowners, the community
and other agencies including natural heritage groups to malntam the grid system for
the studies.
.. 0
I
.
0
Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan
-
, t
,- .-
~ .
B10 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8,1996
.
i
f .
~ ;
I.. \.:r ~~ - is.
-.. ~~...~ ii
· - I I.
.. . ~.. II:Y
:n
",
(;)
(5
z
~ >
> ~
~
~ n
o
a z
~ ~
~ ",
~ x
- ~
a
- ~
. '\@ l~
., -
- ~~
~>
-~~
I ,"'" " '" ~ "" ~ I ~
........, . /'" .:.. ..~ . - ~
i~'~~f\ ~ ~
c , ,.,......... . ~';.;:,...~'>.... ~~' ~ n
> .... ~,,"\ ,,'\.... ,"', ,
< "', ::;',". ' "" (")
", ~...........,':-.."l
~:-..' , .' .... 0
..:..~~ z
;>:5~_ 110...0 ...:-< _ ~
",
x
~
- "1= 1-',
- . I ~ I
I ; == ~ ~~ i ~ I! II
- ' ~"I ... 2,' ~ = II 1':
'" I ='": ~- - Vl ~ ~. - f
. I.~ ~i -~. I ":
. '", ::;.i:" r-:,., ~ "~llli ;
I ~. - ~ x..... ::. q
. I ,,~ iii -~ ~ - I I:,
' I R~ : ::-; = . i..
:..: :J I x I! 2
r r - _ j! i
! Ii ...,-,., .....
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B11
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES #E7/96 - CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA
Public Use Development Zones
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THA T the proposed public use development zones, as identified on the attached map of the
Claireville Conservation Area, be approved in principle;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to consult with other agencies, interest groups and the
public to get input regarding the suitability of the proposed public use development zones.
AMENDMENT
RES. #E8/96
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT paragraph one of the main motion be deleted;
AND FURTHER THAT staff prepare a consolidated report and report back to the Executive
Committee at a later date.
THE AMENDMENT WAS .......................................... CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Endorsement of potential public use development zones within the Claireville Conservation Area.
BACKGROUND
The Strategy for Public Use of Conservation Authority Lands (1995) is now in place and has
provided the Authority with a clear framework for evaluating the acceptability of recreation uses on
its lands. In addition, the fiscal realities now facing the Authority and other public agencies have
created the need for the reconsideration of the Authority's role with regard to recreation
development, and the establishment of various types of partnerships. Facilities and Operations has
developed a pro-active strategy for dealing with the effects of reduced funding from traditional
sources. This strategy centres around the development of a variety of revenue generating
initiatives while maintaining services at locations and times when they will have the most
significant impact on the public.
Staff believe that there are a number of Authority properties which can be developed for recreation
use while improving the overall ecological health and integrity of the watershed. In particular, the
Authority, in the pursuit of its original flood control objectives, and in the course of purchasing
hazard lands and environmentally significant properties, acquired significant acreages of table land.
Much of this table land is acceptable for various types of more intensive public use, and such public
use, whether operated directly by the Authority, or in the context of a partnership, can generate
revenues which can be devoted to managing valleys and other significant natural areas. Based on
B12 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
this concept, the overall strategy for the Facilities and Operations Division through the next three
years involves the pursuit of a number of revenue generating opportunities to be concentrated at a
small number of sites. These sites would be coincident with the existing active use Conservation
Areas, with Claireville Conservation Area being a particular focus due to its location in the market
place and abundance of less-sensitive table lands.
The Claireville Conservation Area site is approximately 848 hectares (2100 acres) in size. Outdoor
recreation and education uses occupy approximately 32% of the land. The surrounding land uses
are primarily industrial with some residential and agricultural uses. Two major transportation
corridors service the area. Highway 427 is located directly to the east, and Highway 407 bisects
the area.
The Claireville Conservation Area currently provides multi-faceted regional scale recreation activities
for the Greater Toronto Area. Although much of the Conservation Area is currently closed to the
public, Wild Water Kingdom, Indian Line Campground, Etobicoke Field Centre, and Claireville Ranch
are operated through partnerships between the Authority, other agencies and individuals.
Following a site analysis it was determined that there are some large areas of open table land which
have excellent recreation development potential. Four recreational development zones have been
identified. One of the zones also has some potential for commercial use associated with the more
traditional recreation uses. All the zones are located outside of the fill and flood regulated areas
and are concentrated in the southern portion of the site, in close association with the existing
recreational activities. Developing additional complimentary recreation facilities in association with
existing recreational activities, will also enable the Authority to market Claireville Conservation Area
as a major destination attraction within the Greater Toronto Area.
A brief description of the four locations are provided below:
The first site is located west of Finch Avenue and directly south of the Hydro right -of-way. It is
approximately 20 hectares (50 acres) in size, and it has been recently used for agricultural
purposes. The area is very flat and has a few single trees throughout.
The second site is located directly north of Highway 407 and east of Finch Avenue. It is
approximately 4.5 hectares (11 acresl in size. The area is a relatively flat old field, containing
hedgerows and some clumps of trees and shrubs.
The third site is located at the south-east corner of Steeles and Finch Avenue, and directly north of
the water theme park. The area is approximately 4 hectares (10 acresl in size. The topography is
flat and the vegetation is typical of old field succession. The prime location of this site may provide
some opportunities to incorporate a complimentary commercial and recreational land use. The
location is currently leased to Wild Water Kingdom.
The fourth site is located north of Highway 407 and directly west of Highway 50. The area is flat
and approximately 10 hectares (30 acresl in size. A portion of the site was recently used for
agricultural purposes and the remainder is old field. There is very little existing tree and shrub
vegetation in this area.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
In addition to operating public use facilities, the Authority is responsible for management and
maintenance of the Authority's land holdings. The work of the Authority has historically been
funded through municipal levy, and revenues derived from gate receipts and various user fees.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B13
Recognizing that funding from tax-based sources is likely to shrink for the foreseeable future, the
Facilities and Operations Division is aiming toward financial self-sufficiently for the facilities it
operates on behalf of the public.
The Authority has an obligation to continue to adequately manage the lands which it holds intrust
for the public. Given reduced levels of municipal funding, staff feel that, in the long term,
watershed management activities can be funded through revenues generated by recreational public
use activities on selected development zones.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
. Consult with the public regarding the proposed public use development zones;
. Investigate public use opportunities through various partnership arrangements;
. Apply the Strategy for Public Use of Conservation Authority Lands (19951 for the selection
of compatible uses;
. Obtain the approval of the Authority for selected recreational uses on Authority land.
Report prepared by:
Gary Wilkins, Ext. 211
/
..
m
.... "
~
,
Glajrevjlle Conservation Area
Proposed Development Zones
m
x
m
n
c
-I
<:
I m
I.HiENn n
0
Nu.td.. s:
' . k"llbu.. s:
kOW
N ( 1J'lulv..lkan Al.. 8uauld.,W' ~
~ II... V.'~ "-
bULLJUIU. m
_ w.. W.I., K8lQdum '" m
1\/ let".... & ah..ulao "- ~
hawalu6'mal'l' l..AJ'..II........ ....
l~ c..,.....InI. . FUUfluod R.lIwlad ./ld hI". c...., -
<D
Ua"u.oI".hll& Ol
'"TTl W.h.
t."1J1'lQ i..""'. F..Luta. 1, Pfoposed RflcllJallon s:
UI.L.~ Alana Comp/tlIC 2. Pfoposed Ad'"d )>
VI~ '(0/.1.' 1",..4.l111 wllh Clly 01 B'.ilJmploll RtlC/tI,d'Ollloll :II
"..u.."'l ..a",u.." ,...,. n
t",...L." 11J/1'I11
""",,.1 .".ll"nm..... ........", alo....... a"'I~I.&"'. ",-..al.. 3, Propolld Comml((;IiI I
DtlVldopllum' 1011" 00
l Pfopoaatl Ac'lve ....
).... ".10. H""IlMllon Ion. <D
<D
........"". Ol
&!_J- - - .. --- ..-
)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B15
RES. #E9/96 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL/LEASE OF AUTHORITY-OWNED LANDS
East of Islington Avenue, Vicinity of Rutherford Road,
City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT the staff report regarding potential disposal by sale or lease of certain Authority-owned table
lands east of Islington Avenue, in the vicinity of Rutherford Road in the City of Vaughan, Regional
Municipality of York, dated February 29, 1996, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to review all public submissions and comments received and
provide a further report to the members of the Authority at Meeting #2/96 scheduled for March
29, 1996 with a suggested course of action for the potential disposition of the subject lands.
AMENDMENT
RES. #E10/96
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT the second paragraph of the main motion be deleted and replaced with the following:
THAT the Chair meet with staff to develop a course of action regarding the potential disposition
of the subject lands and a process for developing an overall strategy regarding the disposal/lease
of Authority-owned lands.
RECORDED VOTE - AMENDMENT
Michael Di Biase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nay
Lois Griffin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nay
Lois Hancey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
Joan King ........................................................ Yea
Richard O'Brien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
Richard Whitehead .................................................. Nay
Continued.. .
B16 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
RECORDED VOTE - MAIN MOTION
Michael Oi Biase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
_ois Griffin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
..ois Hancey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
Joan King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
Richard O'Brien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
Richard Whitehead .................................................. Yea
THE AMENDMENT WAS .......................................... CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS. . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Staff report on the status of the public process concerning the potential disposal by sale or lease O.
certain Authority-owned table lands east of Islington Avenue, in the vicinity of Rutherford Road in
the City of Vaughan. Members of the public have been invited to attend before the Executive
Committee to make submissions or comments.
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #11/95, held December 15, 1995, Resolution #A278/95 was adopted:
"THA T the potential disposal or long term leasing of certain parcels of Authority-
owned land on the east side of Islington A venue, in the vicinity of Rutherford Road,
in the City of Vaughan, be referred to the Authority staff for review, in accordance
with established Authority policies;
AND FURTHER THA T a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a
future date recommending further action."
The Authority, in this instance, received requests from the owner of an established private
children's school and the representatives of a religious order, who are interested in establishing
private schools and a retreat Centre, to consider selling or leasing Authority lands in the Boyd area.
The parcels being reviewed are more particularly described as follows:
Parcel 'A': Located on the east side of Islington Avenue, north of Rutherford Road,
being Part of Lots 16, 17 and 18, Concession 7, City o. Vaughan, Regional
Municipality of York, containing approximately 75 acres of vacant table
land.
Parcel 'B': Located on the east side of Islington Avenue south of Rutherford Road,
being Part of Lot 15, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality
of York, containing approximately 10-15 acres of vacant table land.
Parcel'C': Located on the east side of the Islington Avenue, at the entrance to Boyd
Conservation Area, being Part of Lots 12 and 13, Concession 7, City of
Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, containing approximately 10 acres
of table land.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B17
After an extensive review of the three parcels by Authority staff, it is staff's opinion that while it
would be appropriate to continue the public consultation process for Parcels' A' and 'B', Parcel 'C'
located at the Boyd Conservation Area entrance should not be considered at this time because its
disposal has potential impact on the Boyd Conservation Area operation. Staff will continue to
assess the operational and other impacts of disposal of this parcel.
In accordance with Authority policy the following action has been taken to date:
. signs were installed on the subject lands on February 19, 1996 inviting public
comment;
. notices of public information sessions were sent to the City of Vaughan and the Regional
Municipality of York Planning Departments, Regional Councilor Di Biase, City Councilor
Corella, Mayor Lorna Jackson, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Ministry of Natural
Resources, the two prospective proponents and the members of the public who have called
for information;
. notice of the Public Information Session and requests for public comment were
placed in the Toronto Star and the Richmond HiIINaughanlThornhill Liberal on
February 28, 1996;
. a Public Information Session will be held on March 6, 1996, at the West Vaughan
Community Centre during the hours of 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.;
. members of the public have been invited to attend the Executive Committee to
make submissions or comments.
Authority staff including representatives from the Property and Administrative Services Section and
the Facilities and Operation Division will be on hand throughout the Public Information Session.
The attached public information package was prepared for distribution. This package will be
available during the Public Information Session and will be mailed out to all parties who express an
interest in the property.
Staff has been advised verbally that the City of Vaughan has no objection to the proposed disposal
and this matter will be dealt with formally by Vaughan Council on February 29, 1996.
The Regional Municipality of York has indicated the Region has no objection to a sale or lease.
However, the Region may require a strip of land in this area on the east side of Islington Avenue to
accommodate the proposed widening of Islington Avenue to five lanes in the future.
It is proposed that the disposal of the lands be at market value.
RATIONALE
Staff feels it is essential that in the management of the Authority's resources that every effort
possible is made to assist in reducing the funding requirements from the taxpayers, and
accordingly, the disposal of these lands by sale or lease, if suitable arrangements can be made, is in
the best interests of the Authority and the public.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the funds generated from the sale or lease of these lands be utilized to carry out
high priority Authority activities.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, extension 223
, t
.- ..-
B18 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
". ,<
.
-
!
- ,- C (j v ;-, AP\EA i
-- " I
- - - ~ I
!
~
I
I
I
,- '- ( I
,
I
/..-
I"" I
,
I
I
I
I
NiEAS TO EE .
INV6TICAiE
FCR 0JS=0S)l
Il.EASC: ,
~~01
.: ~
... '
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B19
RES. #E11/96 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL/LEASE OF AUTHORITY-OWNED LANDS
East of Islington Avenue, Vicinity of Rutherford Road,
City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed
Moved by: Michael Oi Biase
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT the staff report regarding comment received at the Public Infonnation Session relating to the
potential disposal by sale or lease of certain Authority-owned table lands east of Islington Avenue,
in the vicinity of Rutherford Road in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, dated
February 11, 1998, be received. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Comment received from the Public Information Session.
BACKGROUND
A Public Information Session was held on March 6, 1996, at the West Vaughan Community Centre
during the hours of 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m and two comment sheets were received.
In addition to the comment sheets received, a number of people attended the session and none of
the participants had any objection to the proposed disposal.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, extension 223
B20 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
RES. #E12/96 - STORMWATER ASSESSMENT MONITORING AND PERFORMANCE
(SWAMP) PROGRAM
Purchase of Monitoring Equipment
Moved by: Brian Har,' In
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT four Hydrolab DataSonde multiprobe loggers be purchased from Hoskin Scientific Limited
at a cost not to exceed $41,615.52, including PST and GST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of online water quality monitoring equipment necessary to assess the performance of
stormwater management facilities, as part of the joint MTRCAIMOEEIMTOIEnvironment Canada
StormWater Assessment Monitoring and Performance (SWAMPl Program.
BACKGROUND
Stormwater management guidelines released by the province in 1991 and 1994, backed by strong
federal fisheries legislation and increasing public expectations, have established requirements for
stormwater quality control. The technologies available to meet stormwater quality requirements
have evolved rapidly over the past few years, and therefore have not been widely tested in Ontario.
There is increasing concern among local municipalities and members of the development community
as to the performance of these technologies and their maintenance requirements.
In 1995, the Authority became a participant in a three year storm water assessment monitoring and
performance (SWAMPl program involving the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MOEEl, Ministry
of Transportation (MTOl, and the Burlington Environmental Technology Office (BETOl of
Environment Canada. The purpose of the program is to provide performance assessment and
environmental effects monitoring for new and conventional storm water treatment technologies. To
date, monitoring programs are being designed and initiated at a number of provincial/municipal pilot
projects including MTO's stormwater management pondlwetland at the Highway 401/Rouge River
crossing, the City of Toronto's Eastern Beaches Detention Tank, and the Town of Richmond Hill's
Harding Park Regeneration Project in the Don watershed. Additional facilities will be added to the
overall program in future years, including the City of Scarborough's Dunker's Flow Balancing
System, the City of Etobicoke's Flow Balancing System, and Metro Works' Emery Creek water
quality improvement project.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B21
RATIONALE
Equipment used for monitoring concentrations of certain water quality parameters is needed in
order to carry out the SWAMP program. Some of the required equipment has been provided to the
program as an "in-kind" contribution from the MOEE, however additional equipment must be
purchased. Procedures set out in the Authority's Purchasing Policy have been followed.
Written specifications for the equipment were defined and sent to the only two companies known
to supply this type of equipment:
11 Hoskin Scientific Limited; and
21 Ontario Hydrometric Services.
Despite numerous attempts to obtain a response from Ontario Hydrometric Services, no information
was provided by that supplier. Hoskin Scientific Limited submitted a quotation for their "Hydrolab
DataSonde multiprobe logger, which conformed to the required specifications, in the amount of
$11,892 per unit plus PST IGST.
In January, 1996, Hoskin Scientific Limited revised its quotation to $9,046 plus PSTIGST, based on
a promotional sale applicable to this equipment. Therefore, the total cost for the purchase of four
units is $41,615.52 ($36,187.40 plus $5,428.12 in taxesl.
The equipment available through Hoskin Scientific Limited is compatible with the equipment
provided by the MOEE to the SWAMP program, and therefore, it can be used interchangeably
should any of the units or their accessories break down. This will minimize the loss of data.
BENEFITS
Data obtained by using this equipment will be instrumental in assessing the performance of
stormwater management facilities at treating stormwater quality. As part of the SWAMP program,
the results of these monitoring studies will be shared among all agencies, municipalities and other
practitioners in the field so that future stormwater management facilities may be designed to
optimize performance.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for the SWAMP Program in fiscal year 1995-96 was derived from Environment Canada's
Great Lakes 2000 Cleanup Fund ($235,000), Ministry of Environment and Energy ($35,0001 and
Ministry of Transportation ($35,0001 and totalled $305,000.
Funds for the purchase of the Hydrolab equipment are available in account number 121-30.
For information contact:
Sonya Meek (ext. 253)
B22 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
RES. #E13/96 - DON VALLEY BRICKWORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Mural Proposal
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the mural proposal submitted by Mr. Sady Jorge Ducros be accepted for installation at the
Don Valley Brickworks;
THAT staff continue working with The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Culture
Department to finalize the contract, implement the design changes requested by the Brickworks
Planning Committee and document the process of mural creation;
AND FURTHER THAT the four artists submitting designs be thanked for their interest and
submissions.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Don Valley Brickworks was purchased in 1987. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
accepted the site for management under agreement with the Authority in 1989. The site consists
of 16.5 hectares in the valley of the Don River, located west of Bayview Avenue in the Borough of
EaSl York. The site contains an assemblage of buildings formerly used by the brick making industry
between 1890 and 1990.
In 1993, a revised project was adopted for the regeneration of the site. The new plan addressed
the important geological, environmental and cultural heritage resources located there while working
within budgetary constraints. The project includes the retention and preservation of many of the
original buildings, and the development of the site for public use and access through the
interpretation of geology, natural environment and cultural heritage resources.
In March of 1994, the Province of Ontario announced that it would fund the provincial share of the
project $2,250,000. Subsequently, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto approved it's
$2,250,000 share of the project. The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto is actively
soliciting donations to raise the remaining $500,000.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B23
In 1995, the Brickworks Technical Steering Committee agreed to com,mission a mural to be
installed on the buildings facing onto Bayview Avenue. The mural size is approximately 4,000
square feet extending approximately 400 feet. It will be installed on a wood facade in front of the
buildings. A two stage invitational selection process was developed similar to the procurement of
public art within The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
The Selection Criteria established the main objective of this project as the commissioning of a high
quality work of public art that would form a major part of the interpretation program for the Don
Valley Brickworks. The mural will be the most visible sign to the public that the site is being
revitalised. The design chosen is to present a unified concept while encompassing the major
themes associated with the project being the Geology, Natural HistorylRegeneration and Industrial
History. The initial primary audience for the mural will be the people who pass the site in
automobiles on the Bayview Extension. Pedestrians and cyclists will also view the mural as they
pass by. After the opening of the park in 1997, visitors will be able to view the mural at a closer
range. The selection committee was required to consider the designs on the basis that the mural
should be able to have an impact on those who may see it only once while having the ability to
reveal layers of meaning over time to those who will see it every day.
A budget of $40,000 was established for the project following discussions with persons involved in
commissioning murals within the City of Scarborough.
The first stage involved the invitation to 17 artists, with mural experience, to express their interest
in the mural competition by the deadline of November 17, 1995. A selection committee comprised
of Susan Hughes (Curator, Todmorden Mills Heritage Museum), Clarissa Lewis (Artist), George
Sanders (Artist), and Kathleen Sharpe (Director, Culture Division, Metro Parks and Culture
Departmentl reviewed the submissions from 11 artists including slides of recent works. Five artists
were short listed to develop proposals for the mural site.
The proposals from the selected artists were received on January 19, 1996. The selection
committee convened to hear presentations from four of the five selected artists being:
Mr. Sady Jorge Ducros
Mr. Ian Leventhal
Mr. Phil Richards
Mr. Phillip Woolf
A fifth artist was unable to provide a proposal due to other commitments. During the
presentations, each artist was asked if he would be willing to strengthen or amend the designs. All
artists agreed that further consultation would be beneficial to the final design.
On February 5, 1996, Mayor Michael Prue and the Authority hosted a reception to view the
proposals by persons interested in the Brickworks project and the regeneration of the Don.
Comments were received from those attending.
On February 9, 1996 the Selection Committee reconvened and recommended the proposal by Mr.
Sady Ducros. This submission was reviewed by the Brickworks Technical Steering Committee and
the Brick Works Planning Committee of Metropolitan Toronto.
The design chosen by Mr. Ducros, in the opinion of the Selection Committee, best meets the
objectives of the competition. Mr. Ducros will be requested to strengthen the "geology"
component of his design.
WORK TO BE DONE
The mural will be painted on site commencing as soon as weather permits and the facade is
constructed. It is anticipated that the this work will begin in early May.
B24 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this work is available in account 113-30-. Funding for the Don Valley Brickworks
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Funds are also available for for the construction and installation of the facade.
For information contact:
Adele Freeman, ext. 238
RES. #E14/96 - AN EVALUATION OF ROADSIDE DITCHES AND OTHER RELATED
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT the firm of J. F. Sabourin and Associates Inc. be retained to undertake an evaluation of
roadside ditches and other related stormwater management practices at a total cost not to exceed
$19,490 including GST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Hiring of a consultant to undertake an evaluation of the environmental, engineering, social, and
economic issues associated with the use of roadside ditches and alternative road drainage systems.
BACKGROUND
The field of stormwater management has evolved substantially from the days when efficient
conveyance channels and end-of-pipe techniques were employed to meet the single purpose
objective of flood control. Now, an integrated "treatment train" approach addresses a complex
range of watershed management objectives. This approach involves a combination of stormwater
management practices at the lot level, along the conveyance system, and at the end-of-pipe.
Although there have been recent local studies, which have documented or begun to document the
technical performance and overall acceptance of some of the lot level and end-of-pipe techniques,
there remain many questions associated with the use of certain conveyance systems. In particular,
the traditional practice of roadside ditches (i.e. rural cross-section I may offer advantages over a
curb-gutter-sewer system (i.e. urban cross-section I by providing some level of stormwater quality
and quantity management. However, when considering the use of roadside ditches as a
stormwater management measure in new urban developments; maintenance of existing ditches; or
conversion of ditches to an urban cross-section, in older neighbourhoods, designers and reviewers
are faced with many opposing opinions over their merits.
For example, Authority and municipal staff find it difficult to assess the degree to which an existing
roadside ditch system, often the only form of SWM in many of the older urban areas, is meeting
current SWM objectives. This information is necessary when considering the regeneration needs of
an area and when considering municipal proposals to upgrade the system to an urban standard
(curb-gutter-sewerl where there may be little opportunity for lot level or end-of-pipe SWM
measures. Initial research by the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and Ryerson
University has described a broad range of perspectives regarding the application of alternative road
drainage systems, but points to the need for further study.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B25
The purpose of this study, therefore, is to investigate and report on environmental, engineering,
social, and economic issues (both positive and negativel associated with the use of roadside
ditches and alternative road drainage systems. This study will build upon the initial work of the
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and Ryerson University. The study will document the
issues associated with the use of roadside ditches and other road drainage systems; develop a
procedure for selecting the appropriate road drainage alternative given site-specific characteristics;
recommend modifications to traditional roadside ditch designs that would address concerns; and
recommend a strategy for improved management and maintenance of existing ditches. A factsheet
summarizing the study findings and recommendations will be produced for broad distribution.
A Review Committee has been established to oversee the study. In addition to Authority staff, the
membership includes representation from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, Ryerson
University, Environment Canada, Ministry of Environment and Energy, Ministry of Natural
Resources, City of Etobicoke and the Town of Richmond Hill.
RATIONALE
In consideration of the need for specialized expertise in the field of municipal engineering and the
time constraints of Authority staff, staff recommend a consultant be retained to conduct the study.
The key roles of the consultant will be to review and document experience from other jurisdictions
as reported in the literature; survey public attitudes; and compare capital, operations and
maintenance costs associated with various road drainage systems.
Terms of reference outlining the objectives and specific tasks of the study were sent to six
consultants, all of whom responded by submitting a proposal. The upset limit for this project was
$20,000 including GST. The following is a list of the six consultants and their bid:
. R. J. Burnside & Associates Limited $20,000
. Donald G. Weatherbe Associates Inc. and
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates 19,998
. Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited 19,997
. Gartner Lee Limited 19,902
. G.M. Sernas & Associates Limited 19,650
. J. F. Sabourin and Associates Inc. 1 9,490
The proposals were evaluated by the Review Committee according to the following criteria:
. understanding of stormwater management objectives and practices;
. past experience;
. qualifications of primary researcher(sl;
. approach;
. quality of proposal;
. cost.
The two firms of J.F. Sabourin & Associates and Donald G. Weatherbe & Associates (with Totten
Sims Hublcki) were short-listed and will be interviewed on February 29, 1996. Based on an overall
evaluation, the Review Committee will recommend the firm that is best qualified to undertake this
study.
BENEFITS
Information and recommendations arising from this study will assist designers and reviewers in
evaluating the use of various road drainage designs as a component of the overall SWM system,
both in newly developing and already developed areas. A better, shared understanding of the
environmental, engineering, social and economic factors will streamline the review process and will
result in optimal solutions. The study findings will also contribute to the improved management and
maintenance of existing ditch systems, which will in turn support watershed regeneration
objectives.
B26 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The total budget of $20,000 for this study is made up by a $15,000 grant from Environment
Canada's Great Lakes 2000 Cleanup Fund and a $5,000 contribution from the Ministry of
Environment and Energy. These funds are committed to the Authority under signed agreements
and are available in part, to date, in Account number 121-25.
Initial research completed by the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and Ryerson
University represents an estimated $10,000 "in kind" contribution to this study.
ANALYSIS
The two short-listed consulting teams of J. F. Sabourin and Associates and Donald G. Weatherbe &
Associates (with Totten Sims Hubickil were interviewed by the Study Review Committee on
February 29, 1996. Based on information provided in the written proposals and interviews, the
Committee recommended that the firm of J. F. Sabourin and Associates Inc. is the best qualified to
undertake this study. The rationale for this choice was based primarily on the following factors:
11 the firm's recent experience on a similar study;
2) expertise available within the team;
31 ability to comprehensively address all key aspects of the study terms of reference;
41 high quality of their proposal and presentation; and
51 their proposal represented the lowest bid.
For information contact:
Sonya Meek, ext. 253
RES #E15/96 - THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO VALLEY AND
SHORELINE REGEN ERA TION PROJECT 1992-1996
East Point Waterfront Park
Consultant Selection
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the firm of Totten Sims Hubicki Associates be retained to complete the final design for the
storm sewer outfall at East Point Park, Scarborough, at a total upset cost of $7,383, including
G.S.T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
To retain a consultant to prepare final design details for a new outfall pipe and structures at East
Point Park, Scarborough.
BACKGROUND
The backwash water from the F. J. Horgan Water Treatment Plant, owned and operated by
Metropolitan Toronto, outlets into a drainage channel at East Point Park. This water flows through
the Park and eventually enters an inlet pipe at the bluffs near the southeast corner of the Park.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B27
In early 1995, the inlet structure became blocked due to excessive icelsnow and debris build-up.
The uncontrolled flow of water over the bluffs has created an eroding gully, extending
approximately 30 metres into the tableland. The erosion of this gully will continue under the
present situation. The existing condition is a public safety issue as well as concern for parkland
and proper discharge of the backwash water from the plant.
Authority staff prepared preliminary designs and cost estimates for several alternative remedial
works. These were reviewed with representatives from Metro Parks and Metro Works
Departments. The preferred alternative calls for a new buried concrete pipe with inlet and outlet
structures in addition to an access trail to the shoreline.
Three consultants have been invited to submit proposals for the final design drawings for the
concrete pipe and structures only.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The consultant will prepare detailed design drawings and specifications for the buried concrete pipe
and the inlet and outfall structures. Authority staff will incorporate this information as part of the
tender documents. The consultant will be available on a per diem basis to assist in the construction
inspection as required.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The budget set for this assignment is $7,000. Funding for the Authority's share will be available
under the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project 1992-
1996. Discussions are underway with Metro Toronto Works Department regarding contributing to
the final cost.
RATIONALE
Four consultants were invited to submit written proposals for the final design. The proposals
received are as follows:
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates $ 7,383
Simcoe Engineering Group Ltd. $ 9,202
Gore & Storrie Ltd. $10,181
Cumming Cockburn Ltd. $20,330
The three lowest cost proposals were reviewed in detail to ensure that the requirements for the
project were met as outlined in the Terms of Reference.
Staff are satisfied that the lowest cost proposal from Totten Sims Hubicki Associates addresses the
requirements for this project.
For information contact:
Nigel Cowey, ext. 244
B28 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
RES. #E16/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULA TION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 1 58 for the period of
March 8, 1996 to March 7, 1998, for the applications which are listed below with the exception
of
(M) Glen Corporation... ........................................... CARRIED
RES. #E17/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways, Application (Ml
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the period of
March 8, 1996 to March 7, 1998, for the application (M) - Glen Corporation, Law Development
Group, S & A Strasser Development, H & R Developments Ltd., as listed below.. ... CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(al construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(bl place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such
area from some other place or places;
(cl straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
(AI Pension Fund Realty Limited
To place fill within a regulated area, alter a watercourse and construct in a flood plain on
Part of Block H, Registered Plan 636, (8005-8041 Dixie Roadl, in the City of Brampton,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material for minor landscaping and for expanding the asphalt parking
area. as well as altering a waterway by constructing a new storm water outfall and reconstructing
three existing outfalls within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of a tributary of
the Etobicoke Creek.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B29
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form pa~ of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Anna Richter Architect; Project 94.111; Drawings A.1 and A.6 dated
January 29, 1996; received February 13, 1996..
(2) Plans; prepared by Ogilvie Consultants Limited; Project 785; Drawings M1, Revision 3 and
M2, Revision 1 dated January 29, 1996; received February 13, 1996..
(3) Letter from Anna Richter Architect, dated and received February 26, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
The proposed works involve the placement of fill for minor site landscaping (ie. planting beds I and
for expanding the asphalt parking areas by 0.6 hectares. The proposal also consists of constructing
a new storm water outfall to the adjacent watercourse and reconstructing three existing outfalls.
The entire property is located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain, as well
as the Brampton Special Policy Area at Dixie Road and Steeles Avenue (Offical Plan Amendment
1371.
Control of Floodino:
The total amount of fill placement proposed is 200 m3. This fill material will be spread throughout
the site for landscaping around the existing building and expansion of the parking lot. No adverse
affects to the hydraulics of the flood plain is expected, as confirmed by technical staff. In addition,
staff has reviewed and accepted a stormwater management report which outlines that post-
development flows will match pre-development runoff for the 2 through 100 year storm events.
Pollution:
A combination of silt fencing and temporary rock berm sediment traps will encircle the outfalls
during construction.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be stabilizedlrevegetated following construction. Native plantings will
rehabilitate the disturbed portions of riparian zone around the outfalls.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with the Brampton SPA (Brampton Official Plan Amendment 137) and
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section 4.2.2 C - Development in
Existing Special Policy Areas.
CFN: 27653 Application 259/95/BRAM
For Information contact: George Leja (Ext. 342)
Date: 1996.02.27.
IBI Technical Adhesives Limited
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 14 and Lot 15, Registered Plan 728, (3035 Jarrow
Avenuel, in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 6.7 metre by 53.0 metre addition onto the existing industrial building
within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Little Etobicoke Creek.
B30 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Walter L. Bielaska Architect; Project 9505; Drawings A 1, Revision 1
dated February 12, 1996; Drawing A2 dated October 6, 1995; Drawing A3 dated October
5, 1995; received February 23, 1996.
(2) Plans; prepared by Ravens Engineering Inc.; Project 9505; Drawing S-1 and S-2 dated
November 10, 1995; received February 23, 1996.
(3) Structural Analysis Letter/Report prepared by Ravens Engineering Inc.; Project 9518, dated
February 21, 1996; received February 23, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
The applicant wishes to construct a 6.7 metre by 53.0 metre addition onto the south side of the
existing industrial building. The site is located within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Little
Etobicoke Creek and the Mississauga (Dixie/Oundasl Special Policy Area (SPAl.
Control of Floodino:
The new addition will be flood proofed to above the Regional Storm flood level. A structural
analysis has been submitted, supporting this level of floodproofing, which is in accordance with the
SPA criteria for proposed structural development.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with the OixielDundas SPA (Mississauga Official Plan Amendment
491 and the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27815 Application: 038/96/MISS
For Information contact: George Leja (Ext. 342)
Date: 1996.02.27.
(Cl Daniel Greco
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 22, Concession 8, (10240 Highway 271, in the City
of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 1.8 metre by 9.1 metre dog kennel building within the Regional
Storm flood plain of the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; submitted by the applicant; received February 9, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B31
ProDosal:
The proposal consists of the construction of a 1.8 metre by 9.1 metre dog kennel building within
the Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River. The application has been submitted in order to
resolve a violation under Ontario Regulation 158.
Control of Floodinc:
The building site is situated outside the hydraulic floodway. In addition, no electrical fixtures or
outlets are proposed within the building. The structure will be wet-floodproofed to the Regional
Storm flood elevation.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected as part of the works.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2.(El - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27784 CFN:024/96NAUG
For Information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.02.23.
(OJ Mark Marcues
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Lot 21, Registered
Plan M-1114, (46 Birch Hill Road - Woodbridgel, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material for minor lot grading and construct a single family dwelling
within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Bettencourt Designs Ltd.; Project 95053; Drawings A 1, A2, A3, A4, A5,
A6 and A 7 dated August 1995; received February 16, 1996.
(2) Letter from G. Bettencourt of Bettencourt Designs Ltd.; dated and received February 27,
1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The proposal consists of placing fill for minor lot grading and constructing a single family dwelling.
The property is located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber
River, (East Branchl and within the Woodbridge Special Policy Area (SPAl.
Control of Floodinc:
The perimeter of the building envelope is subject to minimal flood depths under Regional Storm
conditions. Grading to meet Building Code requirements will have the effect of floodproofing the
structure to above the level of the Regional Storm, which is in accordance with the requirements of
the Woodbridge SPA.
B32 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
Pollution:
No sedimentation within the watercourse is expected as the site is located 115 metres from the
East Humber River.
Conservation of Land:
The filled and disturbed areas around the building foundation will be topsoiled and sodded following
construction.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with the Woodbridge SPA (Vaughan Official Plan Amendment 440)
and the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section 4.2.1 - Development
in Established Communities.
CFN: 27795 Aoplication: 031/96N AUG
For Information contact: George Leja (ext. 3421
Date:1996.02.23.
lEI Tonv Morelli
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 24, Registered Plan 9831, (72 Bruce Street,
Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material in conjunction with the construction of a residential dwelling
within the Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plan; submitted by the applicant; received February 20, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
The applicant wishes to place topsoil fill in order to revegetate the disturbed area around a
proposed single family dwelling. A previous permit was issued (C-0965) in 1988 for three homes in
this registered plan of subdivision. This vacant lot of the suodivision has now changed ownership
and a subsequent permit must be approved under the new owner's name, in accordance with
Ontario Regulation 158. The proposed works are located above the Regional Storm flood plain;
however, within the Fill Regulated Area.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be installed and maintained at the limit of disturbance in the backyard area.
Conservation of Land:
The proposal complies with the previously approved geotechnical report prepared for the
subdivision. All roof leaders will be directed toward Bruce Street and the proposed development
will occur on the tableland portion of the site.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B33
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.2.2.(Gl - Infilling, of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27735 Application: 016/96N AUG
For Information contact: George Leja (ext. 3421
Date: 1996.02.23.
IF) The Citv of Vauohan - Enoineerino Deoartment
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 10, Concession 8, (Langstaff
RoadlWoodland Courtl, in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake regrading in the regulated area of the Robinson Creek in order to
facilitate the construction of a watermain.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd.; Project 4239; Drawing 3; dated February
1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
To construct a 300 mm diameter watermain crossing of the Robinson Creek. Trenching and bore
pits are required within the Fill Regulated Area. The crossing itself will be undertaken by jacking
and boring beneath the creek.
Control of Floodino:
No grade changes are proposed within the Flood plain of the Robinson Creek. The control of
flooding will therefore not be affected.
Pollution:
Excavated areas will be protected with temporary rock check dams in order to prevent sediment
from entering the creek.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed bore pits are located a minimum of 10 metres from the low flow channel. Existing
riparian vegetation will not be affected.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in conformance with Section 4.3 of the approved Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 27791 Application: 029/96N AUG
For Information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 2811
Date:1996.02.26.
B34 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
(GI Jette Grosman
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Lot 24, Registered
Plan 2069, (70 Don River Boulevardl, in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as
located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material in conjunction with the construction of a wooden retaining wall
stairway system and to construct a 3.0 metre by 3.0 metre greenhouselgarden shed within the Fill
Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the West Don River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan; submitted by the applicant; received February 6, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
The proposal consists of the construction of a wooden retaining wall 0.8 metres high and 7.6
metres long, as well as 7 wooden steps to replace the existing deteriorating structures of the same
dimensions. Some regrading and minimal backfilling is required behind the new retaining wall;
however, existing ground elevations will be maintained. A new greenhouselgarden shed is also part
of the proposal. The application has been submitted in order to resolve a violation under Ontario
Regulation 158. Both construction sites are located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional
Storm flood plain of the West Don River.
Control of Floodino:
The construction sites are located outside the hydraulic floodway. The greenhouselgarden shed
will be wet-floodproofed to the Regional Storm flood level.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected as part of the works.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be revegetated upon completion of the works.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(El - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 27761 Application: 020/96/NY
For Information contact: George Leja (Ext. 3421
Date: 1996.02.23.
(HI Municioalitv of Metrooolitan Toronto - Works Deoartment
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 6, Concession 3, (Don Mills Road adjacent to Don
Valley Parkway), in the Borough of East York, Don River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 4 metre wide and approximately 110 metre long access road at grade
in order to access an existing sanitary sewer manhole.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B35
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form pa.rt of this permit:
(1) North Toronto S.T.S., Access Road to Manhole 3 Plan; prepared by Metro Works; Drawing
95-532-1; received January 16, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosat:
In order to access an existing sanitary sewer manhole, Metro Works is proposing to construct a 4 m
wide and approximately 110m long access road at grade in the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The
road is to be located at the toe of an access ramp embankment to the Don Valley Parkway and
links to an existing bicycle trail.
Control of Floodino:
As the road is to be constructed at grade there will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
The site is well away from the watercourse. The proposed construction will not create a threat of
pollution. The disturbed area will be seeded following the work.
Conservation of Land:
The site of the work is currently a flat open grassy meadow with no woody vegetation. The valley
has already been disturbed at this site by the construction and on-going maintenance of the Don
Valley Parkway. The existing bicycle trail is between the watercourse and the proposed access
road. No significant natural resource features will be impacted.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
as it relates to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 27798 Application: 032/96/EY
For Information contact: Mary Asselstine (Ext. 3041
Date: 1996.02.27.
III York Downs Golf and Countrv Club
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 18, Concession 5, (York Downs Golf Coursel, in the
Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a sanitary sewer across an intermittent tributary of the Rouge River..
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Red-line Revision, York Downs Sanitary Sub-trunk Sewer; prepared by Cosburn Patterson
Mather Ltd.; Project 92992: Drawing 6, received Feb. 22, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
B36 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
ProDosal
In order to allow for future development, the applicant is proposing to construct a sanitary sewer to
connect to a future regional sewer on 16th Ave. The sewer is to be trenched across a wetland
area of a generally well defined intermittent tributary that feeds into Bruce Creek. The work is to
proceed this winter.
Control of Floodinc:
As the upstream drainage area is 70 ha there is no Regional Storm flood plain defined for the site of
the crossing. All existing grades will be re-instated following the excavation. There will be no
impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
The work will be undertaken under frozen conditions minimizing possible suspension of sediments.
A sediment fence will be installed on the downstream side and remain in place until the site has
been stabilised.
Conservation of Land:
Cattail plugs will be removed from the site prior to the work and will be replanted in all the
disturbed areas. There is no fishery resource at this site.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 27790 Application: 030/96/MARK
For Information contact: Mary Asselstine (Ext. 3041
Date: 1996.02.27.
(J) Procress Citv Centre Ltd.
To construct in a flood plain on 710 Progress Avenue, in the City of Scarborough, Highland
Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct three new loading docks onto an existing industrial building.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Renovations to 710 Progress Ave., Site Plans, Elevations, Ground Floor Plan; prepared by
Sirlin and Giller Architects; Project 9338-X, Drawings A 1 and A2; received Feb. 12, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The applicant is proposing to construct 3 new loading dock entrances to an existing industrial
development within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Highland Creek.
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B37
Control of Floodinc:
There is approximately 0.6 metres of flooding on the property under Regional Storm conditions. All
proposed openings will be located approximately 1.0 m above existing grade and above the
Regional Storm flood elevation.
Pollution:
There is no risk to pollution caused by these works.
Conservation of Land:
There are no natural resource features that will be impacted by these works.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.2.2 (Cl, Existing Development - Minor Additions.
CFN: 27785 Application: 025/96/SCAR
For Information contact: Mary Asselstine (Ext. 3041
Date: 1996.02.26.
(KI Recion of Peel - Public Works Deoartment
To place fill within a regulated area on Part of Lots 3, 6 and 7, Concession 1 (Albion), (East
side of Airport Road, between Mayfield Road to north of Healy Road), in the Town of
Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same, et. al.
The purpose is to place fill material in conjunction with the installation of a 300 millimetre diameter
watermain within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of Salt Creek.
(1 ) Plans; prepared by the Region of Peel - Public Works Department; Project 95-1010;
Drawings 21982-D, 21989-D and 21990-D dated September 1995; received January 18,
1996.
(2) Letter from R.N. Senko, Project Coordinator, Engineering and Construction Division, Region
of Peel - Public Works Department; dated February 26, 1996; received March 4, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
The proposal consists of directional boring beneath three locations of Salt Creek and installing a
300 millimetre diameter watermain along the east side of Airport Road. Temporary stockpiling will
occur adjacent to the bore pits at all three locations. The sites are located within the Regional
Storm flood plain and the southern-most location is within the Fill Regulated Area of Salt Creek.
Written consents from all affected landowners will be received prior to the meeting for temporary
working easements along the construction route.
Control of Floodinc:
Post construction grades will match pre-development ground elevations throughout the work zones.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will encircle all bore pit and stockpiled areas adjacent to the watercourse.
B38 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be revegetated following construction. Native" plantin9s will restore the
disturbed portions of each riparian zone.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Vbl'ey and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27697 Application: 004/96/CAL
For Information contact: George Leja (ext. 3421
Date:1996.02.26.
III Weston/400 North Business Park
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Concession 5, in the City of
Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by the following:
651970 Ontario Limited, Roybridge Holdings Ltd., 606578 Ontario Ltd., Designscape
Enterprises Ltd., Bonnydon Limited, Saccoia Corporation (112966 Ontario Inc.), Wallace P.
Canivet Ltd., Valley Mill Developments Ltd., H. & L. Title Inc. & Ledbury Investments Ltd.,
1081626 Ontario Limited, 281187 Ontario Limited.
The purpose is to undertake channelization and partial enclosure of the Black Creek in order to
facilitate the development of an industrial area. The proposal Involves tne reach of the Black Creek
from Rutherford Road to Langstaff Road and between Weston Road and Highway 400 (see
attached mapl.
(11 Report entitled "Weston/400 North Development Area" - Stormwater Management Report;
prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather Ltd.; File 92990-101; dated January 1993; revised
January 199
(21 Letter of Undertaking from Mr. S. Schaefer of Cosburn Patterson Mather Ltd.; dated
January 29, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The proposal to undertake channelization and partial enclosure of the Black Creek in order to
facilitate the development of an industrial area involves the reach of the Black Creek from
Rutherford Road to Langstaff Road and between Weston Road and Highway 400. The area is not
fill regulated. The works involve modifications to the Regional Storm flood plain and existing
natural channel.
The works are intended to allow development of an industrial area known as the Weston/400 North
Business Park. In order to provide a comprehensive overview of this application, a brief background
is provided.
The City of Vaughan Official Plan Amendment 288 area (boundaries outlined abovel is known as
the Weston/400 North Business Park. This secondary plan area was approved for development in
1988. The environmental component of the secondary plan contained provisions for determining
the limits of the Regional Storm flood plain of the Black Creek and placing those lands susceptible
to flooding into an appropriate open space category. It also contained provisions that no
watercourse alterations would be permitted without the approval of the MTRCA and that any lands
not required for flood control in relation to such an approval could be developed in accordance with
the adjacent land use.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B39
After approval of the secondary plan, the owners group undertook a flood plain mapping study to
determine the extent of the Regional Storm flood plain within the block. This study indicated that
the flood plain was extremely broad and shallow, being up to 350 metres in width and only a few
centimetres in depth. As a result of these findings, the owners approached Authority staff with
proposals to enclose the low flow channel and flows up to the 100 year storm event through the
entire block in order to increase the amount of land available for development. These discussions
began in 1989-1990.
Staff were not supportive of this proposal, but advised that a channelization proposal which
utilized natural channel design techniques would be considered. This was due to the highly altered
and degraded nature of the existing watercourse and stream corridor, the wide, shallow nature of
the flood plain and the proposed Regional Storm culvert for the Black Creek under Highway 400.
This culvert has now been constructed by the Ministry of Transportation and has resulted in a
lowering of the stream invert by approximately 2 metres at the downstream limit of the site. The
secondary plan area is also scheduled to include the construction of a storm drainage system. This
necessitates lowering of the stream invert. Staff was of the opinion that a channelization
incorporating natural channel design elements and rehabilitation plantings would represent an
opportunity to regenerate this reach of the Black Creek. It would also address the Authority's
stormwater management criteria and risk management objectives.
The owners group have held extensive negotiations with staff of the Authority, Ministry of Natural
Resources and the City of Vaughan over the past several years in preparing the present design
submission which is being recommended for approval. Highlights of this submission include the
following:
- Enclosure of the upstream 160 metres of the channel in a box culvert designed to convey
the 100 year storm event and relocation of the channel to the central part of the block from
the current location adjacent to Weston Road. The requirement for the enclosure of the
channel at the north end of the block is based on requirements for access to a commercial
block within the plan established by the Region of York;
- Construction of a valley feature approximately 70 metres in width which will convey
Regional Storm flows, provide on-line stormwater quantity control in areas upstream of road
crossings maintain existing riparian storage volume and maintain the total existing valley
corridor length of approximately 1900 metres;
- Creation of a natural low flow channel (reflecting meander patterns and bed material of
similar stream typesl in the valley floor;
- Construction of four off-line stormwater quality control ponds to be integrated into the
valley feature;
- Incorporation of a 3 metre wide buffer on each side of the valley feature (one side to be in
public ownership and the other side as a structural setback to be incorporated into the
zoning by-law)
Staff have recommended that the owners group apply for a permit to alter a watercourse in order
to confirm that the Executive Committee will approve the channelization concept prior to staff
providing comments on draft plans of subdivisions within the secondary plan area.
B40 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
Control of Floodino:
The Black Creek has an upstream drainage area of approximately 140. hectares at the northern end
of the block. The existing Regional Storm flood plain varies in width between 50 and 350 metres.
Flood depths are shallow throughout most of the area. The proposed valley feature will be designed
to convey Regional Storm flows (26.3 cubic metres per secondl as well as post to pre development
runoff control for the developed area for the 2 through 100 year storm events. Once the valley
feature is constructed, none of the industrial lots within the secondary plan area will be subject to
flooding under Regional Storm conditions.
Authority water quality control requirements will be addressed through the construction of four
ponds which will provide detention for the 25mm storm event. As noted above, these ponds will
be located adjacent to the channel and integrated into the valley feature.
Pollution:
The proposed channel represents a relocation of the existing low flow channel to an area more
centrally located within the block. It will therefore be possible to construct the majority of the new
channel in the dry without interfering with the existing channel.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed valley feature will consist of sideslopes with steepness varying between 2: 1 and 4: 1
(average 3: 11 with a maximum height of 2 metres. The slopes will be engineered and slope stability
will not be a concern. The natural channel will include a sinuous low flow channel based on
empirical drainage area calculations and extensive riparian and valleyland plantings. Efforts will be
made to preserve as much existing woody vegetation as possible on the adjacent industrial areas
through future site plan control applications. The 3 metre buffer in public ownership will provide
the opportunity for a future trail system.
Policv Guidelines:
Since discussions began with the development group, the Authority has approved the Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program (19941. In this document, provision is made for the
alteration of stream corridors with unusually wide flood plains, provided certain criteria are met,
similar to those outlined earlier in this report (Section 3.2.2.Cl. It is the opinion of staff that the
proposal is in compliance with this section of the policy document.
Imolementation
Development within the Secondary Plan will be built out over a period of years. As a result, staff
has been concerned with the implementation of the works. In order to avoid piecemeal
construction of segments of the proposed channel and stormwater facilities, the owners have
agreed to a staff request to undertake a master servicing strategy prior to registration of the draft
plans of subdivision. The purpose of this strategy is to minimize the need for interim works and
ensure construction of the overall works is phased in a comprehensive manner.
Each individual developer will be responsible for participating in the master servicing strategy and
will then be responsible for demonstrating compliance with the approved permit and implementatIOn
(timing, phasingl requirements before final development approvals are given. Construction
(contractl drawings for the relevant section of the works, as set out in the servicing strategy, will
be submitted for staff review prior to const"uction. This servicing strategy will deal with issues
such as
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B41
sedimentation, how the individual sections of the channel will comply with the overall report and
will also provide for interim storm water management and flood control if necessary. Conditions
outlining these requirements will be included in the Authority draft plan comments in order to
ensure this. These conditions will be in addition to the standard Authority conditions pertaining to
such things as acquisition of open space lands and setbacks.
CFN: 20186 Application #: 280/90N AUG
For Information contact: Richard Lloyd (extension 2811
Date: 1996.02.26.
1M) Glen Corooration. Law Develooment Grouo. S & A Strasser Develooment.
H & R Develooments Ltd.
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 21, 22 and 23, Concession 2, (north of Major
Mackenzie Drive, east of Bayview Drivel, in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a series of on-line wetlandslponds to provide storm water quantity
control and water quality treatment for four proposed subdivisions and the untreated developed
drainage area upstream.
(11 Redline Revision, Stormwater Detention Ponds; prepared by Fred Schaeffer and Assoc.;
Contract 95-E-1747; Drawings 1, 2 and 4; received March 5,1996.
(21 Stormwater Detention Ponds; prepared by Fred Schaeffer and Associates; Contract 95-E-
1747; Drawings 3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 and 12; received March 5,1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
In compliance with the Master Environmental Servicing Plan (MESPl for OPA 121, a water
qualitylquantity facility is proposed to be excavated on-line to Beaver Creek. The facility which is a
series of wet ponds and wetlands, will service four of the subdivisions in OPA 121 as well as
provide water quality treatment for the upstream area which is currently developed.
Control of Floodino:
The facility will provide control of the post development 100 year storm runoff to pre-development
levels. In addition, the Regional Storm flood plain will be contained within the limits of the facility.
Pollution:
The wet pondlwetland facility will be constructed in the dry following the diversion of the existing
watercourse around the work site. Sediment fence will be installed around the diverted
watercourse during the excavation of the facility. The watercourse will be re-introduced to the
facility after the disturbed soils have been stabilised.
B42 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996
Conservation of Land:
Through the MESP process, the Ministry of Natural Resources has agreed to support the
modifications to the Beaver Creek channel at this location. The water quality treatment proposed
for the upstream lands is part of a fishery compensation package for the works.
The wetpond/wetland facility will be restored with native trees, shrubs and aquatic vegetation.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management program
as it relates to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 27380 Application: 162/95/RH
For Information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.02.27.
IN) The Soorts Club of Canada
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 1, Concession 3, (7015 Leslie Street), in the Town
of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 50 m2 addition to an existing recreation complex.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan Project Data, The Valleywood Club; prepared by Okun Architect Inc.; Drawing
SP1; received Feb. 29, 1996.
(2) Elevations, The Valleywood Club; prepared by Okun Architect Inc.; Drawing 5; received
Feb. 29, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
The applicant is proposing to construct a 50 m2 addition onto an existing 1421 m2 recreation
complex in the flood plain of the Don River. The addition will be constructed at the same floor
elevation as the existing structure, and there will be no new openings int~d:;uced to the structure.
Control of Floodino:
The existing building and proposed structure are located outside of the flood way and are subject to
approximately 0.8 meters of flooding under Regional Storm conditions. The existing and proposed
finished floor elevation are above the 350 year storm level. Under these circumstances the
proposed addition is adequately floodproofed.
Pollution:
The work will not introduce pollution to the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The addition is to be constructed on the side of the existing building that is away from the
watercourse. There are no significant natural resource features that will be impacted.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/96, MARCH 8, 1996 B43
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
as it relates to Section 4.2.2 (Cl Existing Development - Minor Additions.
CFN: 27832 Application: 041/96/MARK
For Information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 3041
Date: 1996.03.06
RES. #E 18/96 - APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS
September to December, 1995
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT expenditures for the months of September to December, 1995, in the amount of
$13,858,200 be approved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
This item was recommended for approval at Finance and Advisory Board Committee Meeting
#1/96, held March 1, 1996.
KEY ISSUE
Request for approval of the accounts for September to December, 1995.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11 :30 a.m., January 12, 1996.,
Richard O'Brien J. Craic Mather
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
pI.
~
, the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #2/96 Page B44
April 1 2, 1996
The Executive Committee met in the Humber Room at the Authority Head Office, 5 Shoreham
Drive, Downsview, on Friday, April 12, 1996. The Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to
order at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT
Michael Oi Biase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Lois Griffin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Lois Hancey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice Chair, Authority
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Joan King ........................................................ Member
Richard O'Brien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair, Authority
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard Whitehead .................................................. Member
RES. #E19/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/96, held March 8, 1996 be approved. ............ CARRIED
BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
Res. #E10/96, found on Page B15, should be recorded as being moved by Lois Hancey and
seconded by Joan King. The minutes of Meeting #1/96, held March 8, 1996 will be corrected to
reflect this change.
845 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
CORRESPONDENCE
(al A letter from C.W. Lundy, Regional Clerk, The Regional Municipality of Durham, Clerk's
Department, re: 1996 Conservation Authority Budgets.
(bl A letter from Waneeta Robertson, Executive Coordinator, The Conservation Foundation of
Greater Toronto, re: appointing the Chair of the Authority as a member of The Conservation
Foundation.
RES. #E20/96 - CORRESPONDENCE
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT a letter from the Chair of the Authority, expressing appreciation for their continued support
of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, be sent to The Regional
Municipality of Durham. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B46
REC~rVED
April 1, 1996 APR 4 1996
,
Chief Administrators OUlce
-- - __I r
- -=====------....-.
__ - ~ -----..-...-1 , "-
Mr. J.C. Mather
"e RegIonal j'crnef Administrative Officer
- . _1- _H___ \J ~trspoTitan Toronto and Region
- r-n-,
,: Durham
:J"!rk's Department Conservation Authonty
5 5horeham Drive
-:)5 Rossland'Rd. East Downsview, Ontario
.0. Box 623 M3M 154
::,i,uy,Ontano
=---"ada L 1 N 6A3
:;]5) 668-7711 1996 Conservation Authoritv Budaets - Our File: F05-G
QA. (905)668-9963
-. W. Lundy A.M.C.T. Mr. Mather, the Rnance and AdminIstration Committee of Regional
,,"giOfiai Clerk Council considered the above matter and at a meeting held on March 27,
1996, Council adopted the follOWing recommendation of the Committee:
"THAT the 1996 Budgets for the Conservation Authorities be maintained
at the 1995 level of $1,823,200."
Would you kindly advise the members of your Authority of the above
deCision of Regional Council.
-e. ~ o/-::d-
C.W. Lundy, A.M.C.T.
Regional Clerk
CWUdb
cc: Mr. J.L. Gartley, Commissioner of Finance
847 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
April 11, 1996
Honorary Patron
The Honourable Henry N R Jackman
ll.utenant Gove-rnOf 01 Ontlno
ONI.or. Mr. J. Craig Mather
Kenn.th A 8m.. Chief Administrative Offlcer/
Chait
Jam" W KIenan Secretary-Treasurer
PraSlOenf The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Wilham A MeL,an Conservation Authority
VIC..Pr...GenI 5 Shoreham Drive
J Crarg MaU'ler DOWNSVIEW,Ontano
Secretary- Trellurar M3N 1 S4
Wan.." A RObenson
e.ecuflve Co-Otornator
Dear Craig:
Directors
Rooen w aao.n... The Members of the Conservation Foundation, at its Annual Meeting yesterday,
RobIn J BUr;l.f considered the desirability of being assured that the Chair of the Conservation
Ronald M el'mll1e Authority would be a member of the Conservation Foundation. In this regard. tr
HaNlv H Cia,. following was resolved:
Davia E Crombie
Wilham B Grano.r
Wilham R "'rod;e .UPON MOTION duly made by W. A. McLean and seconded by J. W.
Wllll8m A LlVltU,ll0n Keenan, IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED THAT the Conservation
Sl'lIrley A Marsden Foundation request the Conservation Authonty to appomt the Chair of the
JOhn A McGinnIs Authority as a member of the Conservation Foundation, as part of the
Wlllllm e MlSln.,
Manl A MUir Authonty's entitlement to have four of its members as members of the
John G po.Munson Conservation Foundation."
AI Ruggaro
81hef1~ N Salmon
H Olann, Suller
Kip Va., Kemp'n ~
Director Ementua
Flor.ne. E G,iI t-w(...
Gordon 0 W fl'an.rlOn
aneeta Robertson
Executive Co-Ordinator
cc R. M. O'Bnen, Chair. MTRCA
--. -........--- -----_.___..'\UIr__ .__ ._ _ , . ,.
5 Shoreham Dnve, Downsvlew, Ommo, )l3N IS-I (-lIb) 661-6600, Ex[ 17b Fax 66i-689!l
\ .....:1.....: _ Ir... ~ .. -
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B48
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
RES. #E21/96 - PROJECT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE ALTONA FOREST
ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT AREA
Paul and Barbara Rivett Property
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Resolution #A86/95, adopted by the Members
of the Authority at Meeting #3/95 held on April 28, 1995, be rescinded and the following be
approved;
THAT 1.2 acres, more or less, be purchased from Paul and Barbara Rivett, said land being a
triangular shaped parcel of land being Part of Lot 31, Concession 1, Town of Pickering, Regional
Municipality of Durham, fronting on the west side of Rosebank Road, south of Finch Avenue East;
THAT the purchase price be the sum of $213,000.00, plus payment of vendor's legal costs,
together with interest at the rate of 8% per annum, from June 15, 1995, to the date of closing on
any unpaid balance;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT the tentative agreement at hand is conditional on the Authority obtaining the necessary
funds to complete the purchase of the property, prior to December 31, 1996;
THAT in the event the purchase of the property cannot be completed prior to December 31, 1996,
the Authority will not object to the proposed use, but will reserve the right to comment through site
plan approval;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required and obtain any additional approvals required.
849 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
AMENDMENT #1
RES. #E22/96
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT the Authority take no position on the staff recommendation on the Rivett property.
AMENDMENT #2
RES. #E23/96
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT in paragraph six of the main motion, the words "not object to the proposed use, but will
reserve the right to comment through site plan approvar be deleted, and the following be inserted
after "...the Authority will..."pay legal costs up to a maximum of $3,000.00 and the deposit shall
remain at $100.00, such that the clause reads as follows:
THA T in the event the purchase of the property cannot be completed prior to December 31,
1996, the Authority will pay legal costs up to a maximum of $3,000.00 and the deposit
shall remain at $100.00;
AMENDMENT #1 WAS .......................................... NOT CARRIED
AMENDMENT #2 WAS .............................................. CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Completion of the purchase of Paul and Barbara Rivett property on an amended basis to that
authorized at Authority Meeting #3/95, held on April 28, 1995.
BACKGROUND
The Altona Forest Environmentally Significant Area consisting of 53 hectares (131 acres), more or
less is situate in the Town of Pickering in the Regional Municipality of Durham. The forest is located
south of Finch Avenue East, between Rosebank and Altona Roads. It was identified as ESA No. 95
by the MTRCA in the 1982 Environmentally Significant Areas Study and in the updated ESA
Report, 1992. In response to a growing concern that the Altona Forest would be developed, the
Authority adopted a project to acquire the properties at Authority Meeting #3/93, held on April 23,
1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B50
An Ontario Municipal Board Hearing was held during March 1994, to deal with a number of
development applications, with Authority staff and solicitors taking a major role to preserve a
sustainable portion of the Altona Forest. As a result of the hearing, the applications were deferred
by the OMB for two years, pending the Authority's completion of the acquisition of the properties.
The owners are entitled to re-apply to the OMB if their property is not purchased by the MTRCA
prior to April 30 1996.
A total of approximately 46.5 hectares, has been acquired to date, at a total cost of $10,957,600.
This does not include the Speirs donation of 2.7 hectares, the transaction for which is not
scheduled to close until the end of April. If you add the value of the Speirs donation ($900,000),
the total value of the land acquired to date is $11,857,600.
Two parcels remain to be acquired to complete the Project. The Poling lands, adjacent to Altona,
do not need to be acquired at this time since most of the property is designated as open space and
there was no application before the OMB. However, since the OMB decision, a development
application was made to the Town of Pickering, for the Riven property located at the north end of
the Altona Forest, adjacent to the hydro corridor that links the Rouge Park to the Forest. This
application has not yet been circulated to commenting agencies. The owners have notified the
Authority of their intent to make an application to the OMB if the Authority has not purchased their
property by the April 30, 1996 deadline.
On April 28, 1995, by Resolution #86/95, the Authority approved the acquisition of the Rivett
property, subject to the Authority obtaining the necessary funds to complete the purchase of the
property. Unfortunately, funds have not been available. An extension to the existing agreement
has been negotiated whereby the agreement at hand can be extended to November 30, 1996, with
a closing date to be on, or before, December 31, 1996.
Under this revised transaction, all terms and conditions of the original purchase remain in effect
with the exception of the Authority being required to pay interest at a rate of 8% per annum on any
unpaid balance from June 15, 1995, to date of closing and the deposit being increased from
$100.00 to $3,000.00. Also, in the event that the transaction cannot be completed prior to
December 31, 1996, the Authority will not object to the proposed land use, but reserve the right to
comment through site plan approval in order to ensure no negative impacts are incurred to the
Altona Forest.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owners and their solicitor, Mr. Murray Stroud, Barrister
and Solicitor, 356 Kingston Road, Pickering, Ontario, L 1 V 1 A2.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed this proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property as tentatively arranged.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
851 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
RATIONALE
The land being acquired is situated within the approved acquisition boundary of the Project for the
Acquisition of the Altona Forest Environmentally Significant Area.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
Under the approved Project, the Authority is responsible for the management of the Altona Forest.
The addition of this property will not have a significant impact on maintenance costs.
Taxes on the property are estimated to be $400 per year.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to the project for the Altona Forest. (Code 00-435-
5021. Funding in this instance will be requested from the Town of Pickering, the Regional
Municipality of Durham, the Government of Canada, private donors, the Rouge Park Alliance and
others.
Report prepared by:
Ron Dewell, (ext. 245)
For information contact:
Don Prince, (ext. 2211
Ron Dewell, {ext. 2451
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B52
Map - Rivett Property
- - -.
~
,_ __II~ __ _ ....1....
__ ._1.... _ltoy
I . ~..... ....,... --.. .. ,.. ,..... ---
FINCH AVE.
ICnS
RIVETT
/
~ M. T .R.C.A. L.AoNCS
.
~mm AREA OF J. "'URRAY
~ SPEIRS ECOLOGICAL
--:I RESERVE
0
--- c:: ~ AREA OF SP!ERS
PROP::RTY BE!NG
CASSEL., ~ DONATED
~
CD ~ POTENTIAL FUTURE
UJ ACQUISITIONS
en
0
c:: ,"",,;... .AREA OF RIVETT
.-1-,'; PROP::RTY TO BE
POLING 8RAMAlEA ~"'" ACQUIRED
--
LTD. ---- REGIONAL BOUNO.ARY
- ........ MUNlCIP AL BOUNDARY
.
~ ~
0
c::
< sc:..u:
Z -
0 ,...,
.....
~ .. . .. M M - ..
DINARDO
. REVISIONS
(Ill
, ~.--....~
~. ""'.-..n' ..-- .--
- ,.a. - F.B. ~ 1Ul.
I'laE:I' TtnZ
SHE?P ARD AVE. ALTONA FOREST
. _ mlJ!
AL TON A FOREST E.S.A.
....
,tL TNP~OP DGN
853 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
RES. #E24/96 - LICENCE AGREEMENT WITH THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN
TORONTO AND THE CITY OF YORK
Walkway between Emmett Avenue and Eglinton Avenue West, City of York
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Authority approve entering intc a Licence
Agreement for construction of a walkway between Emmett Avenue and Eglinton Avenue West,
City of York, in The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto; with the City of York for a term of five
years, on the basis as set out in the attached copy of Clause No.5, contained in Report No.4 of
The Corporate Administration Committee, as adopted by the Council of The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto at its meeting held on February 28, 1996;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals
and execution of any documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for approval of The
Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, to enter into a Licence Agreement with
the City of York for construction of a walkway on Authority owned land between Emmett Avenue
and Eglinton Avenue West.
BACKGROUND
The subject lands known as the Eglinton Flats are owned by the Authority and have been turned
over to The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for management in accordance with the terms of
the master River Valley agreement, dated June 14, 1961.
The walkway is located on the Eglinton Avenue road embankment. The proposed walkway
construction was reviewed by the Authority's technical staff and it was concluded that the
construction could be undertaken without fill placement. Therefore a permit was not required for
the works.
A plan illustrating the location of the walkway is attached.
RATIONALE
The management of these lands is compatible with the Authority's objectives.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
In accordance with the terms and conditions of the management agreement, no revenue or expense
will be incurred in this instance by the Authority.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, ext. #223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B54
Attachment - Licence Agreement
r8-1.i~~ METRO CLERK
\ fSJ o!
o~ ~
(.ITAtl~O
Clause embodied In Report No.4 of The Corporate Administration Committee, a. adopted by the
Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto at its meeting held on February 28, 1996.
5
UCENCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF YORK;
WALKWAY BETWEEN EMMETT AVENUE AND EGUNTON AVENUE WEST,
em OF YORK.
(The MerropouUm Council on Febnuuy 28, 1996, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Corporate Administration Committee recommends the adoption of the following report
(January 29, 1996) from the Commissioner of Corporate and Human Resources:
Puroose:
Grant of licence to the City of York for the construction of a walkway at the embankment between
Emmett Avenue and EgJinton Avenue West. east of the Humber River Bridge.
Recommendations:
It is recommended, subject to the approval of the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority, that:
(1 ) authority be granted to enter into a Ucence Agreement with the City of York on the terms and
conditions outlined below and in a form and content acceptable to the Metropolitan Solicitor; and
(2) the appropriate Metropolitan Officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to
give effect thereto.
CouncR Reference /Backcround /Hlstorv:
The parklands known as Egllnton Rats in the City of York are managed by Metropolitan Toronto Parks
and Culture Department as part of the operating agreement with the Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (M.T.R.CA). The City of York has proposed a walkway through the said
parklands from Emmett Avenue to Egllnton Avenue West. A sketch showing the walkway is enclosed
for the information of your Committee and the Metropolitan CouncD.
Subject to Metropolitan CouncD approval, it has been agreed that the City of York shall enter into a
Ucence Agreement for the said walkway for a term of fIVe (5) years at a nominal sum consideration,
with liabDIty insurance coverage and such other conditions considered necessary to protect
Metropolitan Corporation Interests. All work connected with the facUlty shall be done at no cost to
Metro in a manner satisfactory to Metropolitan Officials and the Ucence Agreement shall be in a format
- ---- -'-' #>_~. 110 ,_.. __ _':.0.__ ...._,......"'_
855 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
Attachment - Licence Agreement
2
Given the time schedule of the City of York, permission to construct was granted conditional upon
Metropolitan Council approval. The work has since been completed.
Comments and lor Discussion and/or Justification:
In my opinion, the terms and conditions for the said licence as detailed herein are fair and reasonable
and are acceptable to the Deputy Commissioner of Parks and Culture.
Summary Chart:
This report conforms with the following:
Corporate Personnel and
Council Approved Three-year Plan (n/a) Administrative Policies (n/a)
Approved Capital Budget (n/a) Approved Current Budget (n/a)
Standing Committee Approved
Program Priority (n/a) Metro Official Plan (x)
Contact Name and Teleohone Number.
Victor J. Austin, Manager of Real Estate, 392-8164.
(A copy of the sketch, referred to in the foregoing report, is on me in the office of the Metropolitan
Clerk.)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B56
Attachment - Licence Agreement
HuMBE~ R",E~
x e r~-
x ~ ,>
x i
eX . r .'
~
~ IX'\
X ~ {r
,I ) ~\
~Y!,!~
~_ ~ (\, I
- I \
, I I :I I ,
r~' ' ( (A=)
\~ J~
~ x.J
X\.-....../
. I I
. r~-
. "'0
;0
. 0
I "'0'
I- e
U>
I'TI
~. 0
x J\)
.
II ~
ctJ 3
I
x 1>
~ >
;g C/)
~ "'0
... ::I:
-., B ~
\
. -i
,-----) ~)-e=- 1)
~ >
-i
. ::I:
:E
)>
-<
857 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
RES. #E25/96 - RENEWAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT - MTRCA AND THE MCMICHAEL
CANADIAN COLLECTION
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Joan King
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority under the terms of
a lease, dated October 3, 1985, leased certain lands in the City of Vaughan to The McMichael
Canadian Art Collection, for a period of 10 years, for use in conjunction with the McMichael
Gallery;
WHEREAS the Authority is in receipt of a request from The McMichael Canadian Art Collection to
lease the subject lands for an additional 20 year period, commencing January 1, 1996, generally on
the same terms and conditions as contained in the previous lease;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that It is in the best interest of the Authority in
furthering its objects as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co-operate
with The McMichael Canadian Art Collection, in this instance;
THAT a 63.96 acre parcel of land being Part of Lots 22, 23 and 24, Concession VIII, and Part of
Blocks A and C, Registered Plan 5582, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, be leased to
The McMichael Canadian Art Collection, for a 20 year period, commencing January 1, 1996. The
rental rate to be the sum of $1.00 per annum, with all other terms and conditions to be, generally
as set out in the lease, dated October 3, 1985, together with any modifications deemed necessary
by the Authority's solicitor to protect the Authority's interest;
THAT said lease be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources, in accordance
with Section 21(21 of The Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990. Chapter C.27, as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents. ............................. CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The McMichael Canadian Art Collection to extend the existing agreement
for a further 20 year period.
BACKGROUND
Under Lease Agreement dated October 3, 1985, the Authority agreed to lease a 63.96 acre parcel
of Authority-owned land, situate in the City of Vaughan to The McMichael Canadian Art Collection
for 10 years. The 10 year term commenced on the first day of January 1986 and was completed
on December 31, 1995.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B58
The proposed lease agreement provides for the lands to be used for the objects of The McMichael
Canadian Art Collection, as defined by The McMichael Canadian Art Collection Act and affords the
Authority all rights required to carry out any flood control works required during the term of the
lease. The McMichael Canadian Art Collection is to be responsible for all taxes, maintenance and
any other costs incurred during the lease period, with the requirement to submit any development
plans to the Authority for approval.
Report prepared by:
Don Prince Ext. 221
s: m
CJ1
III (0
"0
'- I
AlITIIORITl LANIlS s:
(')
LANIl!. Ll:ASEIl TO TII[ I\1CI\1ICIIAF.L GALLER\ s:
., (')
I Ii :r
- 1_. _ III
- ~
.- ,.J _'. n
, I, , 2-
,
! CD
- (')
. t \ ,~ ' ...
(/I' L.J O'
f' I ::::J
-/ I
,
,~, .', .' I.
..' I
--
, '.
~
'C
:1
...
N
...
(0
(0
0)
m
X
m
n
c
-t
, <:
I . m
';' n
0
, ~
~
~
- m
./ -- m
. ""
c: -. - N
--
''I (0
I 0)
"
( - r.ll ..f ' ~ ....-:?~\
' i ('
I
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B60
RES. #E26 - LEASE OF LAND TO LAKESHORE YACHT CLUB
Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is the owner of the
property consisting of the Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park, in the City of Etobicoke, in The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND WHEREAS the Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the Members of the
Authority in 1995, approved of the leasing of certain lands in this area to the Lakeshore Yacht Club
for boating purposes;
THAT the Authority approve of the inclusion of an additional 0.3 hectares, more or less (.8 acres)
of land previously occupied by the Humber College Sailing Centre, to be incorporated into the lease
with Lakeshore Yacht Club, on the same basis and terms and conditions as set out in the earlier
approval;
THAT this be subject to the approval of the Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents. ............................. CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from Lakeshore Yacht Club to add additional shoreline and water area,
previously occupied by the Humber College Sailing Centre to the lease currently being finalized.
BACKGROUND
Under Resolution #A 188/95, adopted at Authority Meeting #7195 held on August 25, 1995, the
Members of the Authority approved of the Authority entering into a Lease Agreement with The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and Lakeshore Yacht Club, for the leasing of 4.254 hectares
(10.511 acresl for boating purposes. A copy of Resolution #A 188/95, together with an extract of
the report adopted by the Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto at its meeting held
on July 5 and 6, 1995, is attached for the assistance of the Members.
The additional lands proposed to be included under this agreement consists of certain lands earlier
proposed to be leased to Humber College. In September 1995, Humber College advised that due to
financial limitations, they were no longer interested in entering into a lease agreement for the use of
lands at this location. The additional lands Lakeshore Yacht Club will be leasing are illustrated on
the attached sketch. The effect of this arrangement will be to allow full public use of certain of the
lands previously under agreement, as illustrated on the sketch.
861 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
Authority staff have worked closely during the past several years with staff of The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto, in an attempt to finalize lease arrangements at this location and staff of The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto are in concurrence with the proposal at hand. The
arrangement is subject to receiving approval of Metro Council and it is anticipated that this matter
will come before the appropriate Metropolitan Toronto Committee's during the months of April or
May.
RATIONALE
Management of these lands is compatible with the Authority's objectives and consistent with the
Colonel Samuel Smith Ma!'iter Plan.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Management Agreement, no revenue or
expense will be incurred in this instance by the Authority.
Report prepared by:
Don Prince Ext. #221 and Larry Field Ext. #243
Res. #A188/95 Moved by: Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, is the owner of the
property consisting of the Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park, in the City of Etobicoke in The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND WHEREAS the subject lands have been turned over to The Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto, in accordance with the terms of an agreement dated October 11, 1972;
THAT the Aut:lority approve the leasing of certain lands at the Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront
Park for a pep::>d of 10 years and 7 months, commencing January 1, 1995 and expiring July 31,
2005 on the oasis as set out in the attached copy of Clause 25 embodied in Report No. 20 of The
Corporate Administration Committee which was adopted without amendment, by the Council of the
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto at its meeting held on July 5 and 6, 1995;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary
approvals and execution of any documents.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B62
Map - Yacht Club -- - - (c.. -_=~.CI-.------ - :
- -- c " I
'-'q='~,lll I
\ liD ~ III I
, Vr'l', '1'1
'~DlJll
r;- - - ..........
.____...._u_. ..--- __u..u.___....._uu....n.u___.uu.uu.__u..u.._.u_u..., I ; I_
I ! ~
I
1
1
j
r
,!
J
l ."
,:ik; '~ "~~~,~:~\--_....._---_.__...---.-I:
"\1 ' :', ,I
. ; ..:~ ~ ,,\,~, H 1
, oJ, , ~;I ' ~ .:
~"\,,, ,_10, ~ I 1.1 I II I I I '. I I IIII I .. "~I' " ," I
. ~~I' I n I :-, 1111= ~ II II I I I 1 ~'" '.
~.. ,.1 '::. .. ". Ii. I ~' .
,l' '::['~r -'. 111111111 I. 1"11 J II., 'e" -----~--..-
" ,\ i~: i~ . I I 11 I I 1 I J ~ ~ I I I I I I I ;, ' "1, I'
'" .0' II ! ! ';
. 'I t .II " . lit J I I II J!1 13 1 J 1 I l i i II ; ~ -
, '.'ll . 'I' " ' : " " 11 i I I ' : II I J "
, Ii:: . " ~ - J "'\,). : ;.! - -;- . -~ - - - - - -.-
.. h,__ IJ11"IIIIIL111I'l ___ ',' )~.:,
. ~':..""-=--=' -""'::r-";..L..J, rr _..: r::""- ~:...I 1rT:'ll.. ('),::! X.":.
,l ,,,...... l( I' , I , n , I. -.. 'I ,i"-C - '"''
I ~~~::r::. ~ _';; -.. ~~) [, ~\,:-'.. \. .i
, ~I'""I ILI'LI')JII':' -~ - _.,,)1. ..-
. ,~,,, I,,:t ~ - .0 I
,.t. I: I' I ~lIllllI1I11-"'" , .~ ,-~~ ,0, /'
. tt f 1f __~ j , .JJ: '"
J' ,. 'J ,.,. - " .( "','" f
\, , 1..11 I LIlli L1::: ;-::... . ' ,')itl'r,\' ',0' ,
II"',? -.,.A I r. 11 II J I ; I I III .. r' - ,,~, '1 " - '
.. , - ~ ' 'Vi 'f\l I , ,t1" ,;lo'l ,r, t.~
.' ."..~ '. .,,>...... L__._ __ <,,(IIy/! {,j '~'''j 'I, ~'. '(1
_ - 'f.,.,~ I' Ii.'l - ~ ,;,1 .,.... " 1\
. ,~"'_"~' .'.(";~,~r.-'--' J:tj' \ '" '~f' ",'Il" 'r 0.c,. >;;. , '\
'... _=~,..."",., ...,.~,... '\ ~ _ -. '.,1' ..,q r \' .
'... "., _ 1,.., -....... />1 -,- ._1,..." I' ','I 1
_____ '"',......,....'...1. /' \ J .1(' J" - ,I
----- .""- '''','--'-~r.'.'.''.)I'.'- 'L \' ."'0" ;;:./;'''''-l\~ ':.
...... .''''-.. ~~..'.'.',)J' ,~.,.), . -, I '::: I ~ ~ 1
........... ,~,( - ',~ ' I ';".,;{J" ,.(! :.:: .',,~ 0 " ____
.......~. '.,- ""l' '(
..... '<\. ..~"',;- ," ,'_,. ~,," ,"-'j' '.' ',r __
... '. ,. -..."' .. ...........,"" . "" ( ~ ./
'- . ..,., ~Wl . (I, \.-^" .: \. .' ,'.
, '" y., - ':I' ~'f...,:... - :), '''I
\ "'\ f -- -', - ...... .~./
, '\. I I .-,of.. ' ~,' ,'.':,' /. >~
, 1,;,,_ ;' 0' , l,-\~ \'_ ~:r . .."0.. '~\"
\.:,lJ \, ?', _~, ..,..,_.~<_\' (
'(r1 \ '''rlIC -,'"
"",. ~\ r < ~ ,\~I':;:
, , ,
I ~,
, ') \1 ,--
_Ummmum nn .mmuumumuUU .. mum mmuuuummnumnmum. m; .~J~.~~
Iii iri i! i i ~onf1~ ,owm i CJ I!I=~
. if f i! Ii f if! f I f it If;
. ~! f J I I i I' f i I
, f Ii! !
f I; !
jr!-' -,~-'" .--; - -0--.----.--. - ------ - ---.-
I en J nil' '1'1 I I + I ' t :r 1 J ;' . . . . -
:' 1:, ~~ I , ,I ' I !, '. ~ f! , II Ii ! ; , ij l i Y
i f ;~ ; II f II: II I " . I ! I " ! I ; I rll'
; ,~ /. Ii.. f J I I"
:. - iE I : ' J J 1 1 r r i ;1 I I
, " "2 ~~ "I " f I f 'I . I
~ :: I ,'- . J f I f
l ~~ i "I ~ f: : l
"'I __l___. .
863 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
Attachment - Yatch Club
.
\)"ICIP",,(
fa-1i~~ METRO CLERK
~ ~l
o ~
~t.rrA" '(0
Clause embodied in Report No. 20 of The Corporate Administration Committee, as adopted by the
Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto at its meeting held on July 5 and 6,...1995, _
25
LEASE OF LANO TO LAKESHORE YACHT CLUB
AT COLONEL SAMUEL SMITH WATERFRONT PARK.
(The Metropolitan Council on July 5 and 6, 1995, adopted chis Clause. without amendment.)
The Corporate Administration Committee recommends the adoption of the following report
(June 2, 1995) from the Commissioner of Corporate Services:
Pumose:
To enter into a lease agreement with Lakeshore Yacht Club for land at Colonel Samuel Smith
Waterfront Pari<.
Recommendations:
It is recommended, subject to the approval of the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority,that:
<1 ) authority be granted to enter into a lease agreement with Lakeshore Yacht Club on the terms and
conditions outlined below including a rental rate based on the council approved annuaJ per acre
rate applicable to all yacht dubs (which rate will be reviewed by Council later this year) and in a
fOri and content acceptable to the Metropolitan Solicitor; and
(2) the appropriate Metropolitan Officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect
thereto.
Council Reference lBackoround IHistorv:
Metropolitan Counci, by adoption of Oause No. 6 of Report No. 3 of The Parks, Recreation and
Property Committee on February 27, 1991, approved the proposal of the Sam Smith Boating
Federation for the development of boating fa~ities, requested that a Master Plan for the site be
prepared and authorized the negotiation of leases with member clubs of the Federation.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B64
Attachment - Yatch Club 2
By adoption at Clause No. 15 of Report No. 12 at The Management Committee on Apnl a, 1992,
Metropolitan Council authorized the execution at temporary licence agreements with Humber College
of Applied Arts and Technology and L4keshore Yacht Club to permit occupancy of SItes at Colonel
Samuel Smith Waterfront Park, on a temporary basis. until the Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority's application to the City at Etobicoke fer rezoning was completed. While
awaiting the completion of the rezoning and the Master Plan, these temporary licence agreements were
renewed, most recently by adoption of CLause No. 12 of Report No.4 at the Management Committee
on January 26 and 27, 1994.
The appropriate zoning for the park is now in effect and the Master Plan for the site has been
completed. Negotiations for lease agreements were conducted with Mr. Ken Cohen, Oirec:or of
Resources, Humber College, North Campus, No. 205 Humber College Boulevard, Erobicoke, Ontario.
M9W 5L7 and Mr. William Purdy, Vice-Commodore. Lakeshore Yacht Club, No. 13 L4keshore Dnve,
Etoblcoke, Ontario, MaV 1 Y9. Agreement was reached on terms and conditions for the lease that the
former Commissioner of Parks and Property was prepared to recommend for consideration by Council.
However, at the request of L4keshore Yacht Club, the report was withdrawn and the matter deferred
pending fur-J1er negotiation.
By a letter dated May 3, 1995, the new Vice-Commodore for Lakeshore Yacht Club. Ms. Margaret
Hartford, advised that they were now prepared to enter into a lease on the terms and conditions
previously agreed to subjec: to a minor amendment
By a letter dated May 18, 1995, Humber College advised that due to financial limitations they are no
longer interested in entering into a lease agreement for the use of the site.
Accordingly, I am now prepared to recommend the following terms and conditions for a lease with
L4keshore Yacht aut:
(1 ) Leased Property:
The lands outlined in blue shown as Parts 2, 5, 6, 7 and 12 on Schedule A containIng an area of
approximately 4.254 hee.ares (10.511 acres).
(2) Term:
the term shall be for a period of ten (10) years and seven (7) months commencing
January 1, 1995 and expiring July 31, 2005.
(3) Rent:
(a) the annual net rent for each year of the term shall be based on the annual rate per acre
charged to yacht clubs, as approved by Metropolitan Council, payable yearty in advance
on the 1 st day of August fer each year at the term in accordance with the following
schedule:
January 1, 1995 to Jufy 31, 1995 - 60 per cent of the standard yacht dub rate;
August 1, 1995 to July 31, 1996 - 80 per cent of the standard yacht dub rate;
August 1, 1996 to July 31. ~05 - 100 per cent of the standard yacht dub rate;
, \
\
\
B65 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
Attachment - Yatch Club
3
(b) the Tenant shall pay all taxes ~ndUding G.S.T.) and operating expenses applicable to the
Leased Property.
(4) Use:
(a) the Tenant will use, develop, operate and maintain the Leased Property (including
shorelines and adjacent waters) in aCCOrdance with the Master Plan, as approved by the
landlord and the Authority, onty for a boating and yachting dub and ancillary uses such
as meetings, educational and sociaJ activities: and
(b) the Tenant must satisfy itself, at its sole expense. that its intended use of the Leased
Property complies with all zoning by-laws. laws, I'tIles and regutations. whether Federal,
Provincial or Municipal, that may apply to the Leased Property and the Tenant's
occupation and use of the Leased Property_
(5) Master Plan:
(a) the Tenant agrees to accept the Leased Procerty in an .as is. conditIon and will not
reqUire the Landlord or the Authority to pay for or perform any improvements.
maintenance, re;:airs or any other work or supply any equipment or services or incur any
costs in relation to the Leased Property except as may be provided herein, or on the
Master Plan;
(b) the Tenant will not erect any buUdings or stru~ures or install any fencmg, lighting,
navigational lights. markers. boating aids or put up or exhibit any signs, notice boards or
other fixIures without the prior written approvals of the Landlord and the Authority which
shall not be unreasonably withheld where such are reasonably suitable for the uses set
out in Clause 4 (a) above; and
(c) the Landlord and the Authority acknowledge and agree that the Tenant's intention to
develop the Leased Property in accordance with the Master Plan may be subject to
certain financial limitations with respect to the Tenant's capital expenditures over the
relatively short duration of the term of the Lease. Accordingly, the Tenant shall be
permitted to develop the Leased Property during the term of the Lease to the extent that
it is financ:aJly prudent while remaining consistent with the Master Plan.
(6) Operation and Maintenance:
(a) during the term of the Lease, the Tenant, at its sole expense, shall keep the Leased
Property and any improvements thereon in a neat and tidy condition and will maintain the
leased Property and any improvements thereon in good repair and will keep aU walks
and paths in good repair;
(b) the Tenant agrees to maintain any landscaping on the Leased Property in a manner
consistent with its park setting and shall not cut down or damage any trees or shrubs that
may be planted on the leased Property without the prior written consent of the
Metropolitan Commissioner of Parks and Culture (the Commissioner); It being
acknowledged that the Leased Property is devoid of any landscaping at the
commencement of the Lease;
.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B66
Attachment - Yatch Club
4
(c) no storage or use of hazardous or environmentally sensitive matenaJs, except in
compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. will be permitted on the I A:l5e(j
Property and the Tenant will not contaminate the soil of the Leased Property or
surrounding lands or pollute the waters of Lake Ontano;
(d) the Tenant will ensure that nothing is done on the Leased Property or kept at or on the
Leased Property which may be a nuisance to or cause damage to any neighbouring
property or interfere with the occupants of any neighbouring property;
(e) the Tenant will not make any major changes or alterations to the Leased Property except
as set out on the Master Plan or reclaim land from the waters adjacent to the Leased
Property or undertake any tnJing of the hartlour or the waters surrounding Colonel Samuel
Smith Waterfront Park without the pnor wntten approval of the Landlord and the Authonty;
and
(f) upon the expiration or termination of the Lease or any extension or renewal thereof, the
Tenant may remove its buildings, structures and equipment provided it shaJlleave the
Leased Property in a neat and tidy condition satisfactory to the Landlord and the
Authority.
(7) Indemnification and Insurance:
the Tenant agrees that the Lease shall provide for indemnification and insurance coverage in a
form and content satisfactory to the Tenant, the Landlord and the Authority;
(8) Parking and Storage:
(a) the Tenant agrees to use all reasonable efforts to discourage its members and guests
from using the adjacent public parking areas;
(b) the Tenant will ensure that winter storage of boats and equipment is confined to areas
intended for such purposes on the Master Plan; and
(c) the Tenant agrees to provide to any future tenant of Parts 8, 9 and 10 on Schedule A, on
terms and conditions to be approved by the Landlord and the Authority, parking and
storage facilities on Part 2 and/or Part 12 on Schedule A equivalent to the area of Part
12 on Schedule A.
(9) Public Walkway:
(a) the Tenant and/or its members, guests, contractors, workers, agents or employees
(hereinafter referred to as invitees) shall have a non-exclusive right-of-way on, over and
through Part 3 on Schedule A (the PUblic Walkway) for access by members to docks,
with dock carts, for dry sail, launch and haul-out purposes and for the Installation,
maintenance. repair, replacement and/or reconstnJction of their dock connections, utility
conduits, hoses and pipes;
(b) the Tenant's and/or Its invitees' use and/or closure of the Public Walkway for purposes
set out in Cause 9(a) above shall be for as short a period as is reasonably and safely
possible and shall not interfere unduly with the public's reasonable use and enjoyment
of the Public Walkway and the Tenant shaD ensure that all necessary and appropriate
care and precautions Oncluding erecting temporary fences or barricades and providing
supervision) are taken to protect the public's safety. all to the satisfaction of the Landlord
and the Authonty acting reasonably; and
-
867 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
~ttachment - Yatch Club
5
(C) the Tenant. at its sole expense. shall repair any damage to the Public WaJkway,
reasonable wear and tear excepted, caused solely by the Tenant or its invitees to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Landlord and the Authority.
(10) Common Area:
(a) the Tenant agrees to licence to any future tenants of Parts 1 and 4 and Parts 8.9 and 10
on Schedule A, on terms and COnditions to be approved by the Landlord and the
Authority, a Common Area shown as Part 7 on Schedule A that will be used for launching
and hauling-out boats; and
(b) the Tenant shall not pennit public use of the launch ramp in the Common Area for
launch and haul-out purposes.
(1 1) Wet Mooring and Docking:
(a) the Tenant will ensure that wet mooring of boats is confined to the areas indicated on the
Master Plan and will at aJl times conform to all applicable government rules and
regulations;
(b) the Tenant shall not penn it use of the Leased Property for commerCIal or business
purposes other than educatiOnal PUrposes; and
(c) the Tenant agrees to negotiate in good faith WIth the Landlord and the Authority, if the
Landlord and the Authority so require, a separate agreement to aJlow day mooring of
boats by the general public in an area provided on the Master Plan. ThiS area shall be
under the admInistration of the Tenant
(12) Pump-out Facilities:
the Tenant, at its sole expense, shall provide and make available sewage pump-out facilities in the
Common Area shown as Part 7 on Schedule A to Its members and invitees and, upon payment
of a reasonable fee subject to the approval of the Landlord and the Authority, to other members
and invitees of the Sam Smith Boating Federation.
<" 3) Uve-Aboards:
the Tenant will not pennit live-aboards on watercraft. either in or out of the water, from December
1st to March 31st during the tenn of the Lease.
(14) Assign or Sublet:
the Tenant wDI not assign the Lease or sublet any part or all of the leased Property without the
prior written approval of the Landlord and the Authority, which may not be arbitrarily withheld.
(15) Harbour Depth:
the Authority, at Its sole expense, agrees to keep the harbour and channel leading to the harbour
at a minimum depth of 1.8 metres. below the International Great Lakes Datum of 74.005 metres
above sea level.
B68
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996
Attachment - Yatch Club
6
(16) Access:
the Landlord and the AUthonty agree to provide and maintain road access to the Leased Property.
(17) Signage:
the Tenant waJ ensure that all of its signage compfies with applicable municipal by~aws and has
the prior wntten approval of the Landlord and the Authority.
(18) Documentation:
notwithstanding any clause contained or not contained in ttllS Proposal, the Lease shall be in a
form and content acceptable to the Tenant's Solic.~or. the Authority's Solicitor and the
Metropolitan Solicitor.
(19) Approvals:
this proposal is subject to the approval of the membership of Lakeshore Yacht Club. the
Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Metropolitan Administration.
Comments and lor Discussion and lor Justification:
In my opinion, these terms are fair and reasonable and I am advised that staff of the Authority are
prepared to recommend them to the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
The Commissioner of Parks and Culture concurs.
Summarv Chart:
This report conforms with the following:
Corporate Personnel and
Council Approved Three-year Plan en/a) Administrative Policies en/a)
Approved Capital Budget (n/a) Approved Current Budget (n/a)
Standing Committee Approved
Program Priority (n/a) Metro Official Plan (x)
Contact Name and Telechone Number:
Tony Ptttfgfio (392-8155)
(A copy of Schedule A. referred to in the foregoing report (June 2, 1995) from the Commissioner of
Corporate Services, was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda of the Corporate
Administration Committee for its meeting on June 19, 1995, and a copy thereof is also on me in the
otffce of the Metropof/tan Oerk.)
869 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
RES. #E27/96 - RESOLUTION OF AUTHORITY ACCESS ISSUES I THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE HUMBER COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY AND
MANAGEMENT BOARD SECRETARIAT
Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, is the owner of the
property consisting of the Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park in the City of Etobicoke in The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND WHEREAS certain agreements were entered into for access and park development concerns
with the Board of Governors of The Humber College of Applied Arts and Technology and The
Province of Ontario, during the early 1980's;
AND WHEREAS a number of planning and development issues in the area relating to lands owned
by the Province of Ontario and Humber College have recently been resolved, in a manner
acceptable to the parties and to the satisfaction of the City of Etobicoke, The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto and the Authority, to provide for future development and consolidation of the
regional parklands.
THAT the Authority enter into an agreement with Management Board Secretariat of the Province of
Ontario and The Board of Governors of The Humber College of Applied Arts and Technology, to
accommodate regional park access off Kipling Avenue extended to Colonel Samuel Smith Park.
AND FURTHER THAT the aDDropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be remmed to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents. ............................. CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The Board of Governors of The Humber College of Applied Arts and
Technology (Humberl and Management Board Secretariat (The Provincel, to resolve interim access
arrangements to a permanent basis, in accordance with the O.M.B. decision, the conditions of draft
plan of subdivison and other approvals now at hand.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B70
BACKGROUND
During the early 1980's, in conjunction with the construction of the Colonel Samuel Smith
Waterfront Park, the Authority entered into certain agreements with Province of Ontario and
Humber College to facilitate access arrangements. The arrangements included:
(al Permission to enter in a License Agreement with Her Majesty, the Queen, Minister of
Government Services for access across certain lands proposed as the future Kipling Avenue
extension, which were at that time and are still as of current date, owned by the Province
of Ontario, designated as Part 1, Plan 64R-9826. The subject parcel in accordance with the
1995 decision of the Ontario Municipal Board will form part of the future Municipal Road,
known as the Kipling Avenue extension;
(bl Grant of Right-Of-Way and Easement with The Board of Governors of The Humber College
of Applied Arts and Technology, dated August 24, 1984, to facilitate access for
construction and the park entrance across the Lakeshore Humber College Campus, the
arrangement also included certain arrangements to accommodate services required for the
future park.
The recent Ontario Municipal Board Hearing in this area, which concluded on July 7, 1995, assisted
in resolving a number of longstanding, development issues, with respect to the former Lakeshore
Hospital lands owned by Management Board Secretariat and the adjacent Humber College lands. In
addition to facilitating the future extension of Kipling Avenue the demand for regional openspace
and institutional purposes were acknowledged and provision was made to accommodate and
facilitate the use of the Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park.
The development concept for this area accommodates Community College and Health Care uses,
but recognizes that other public facilities may be added. It also provides for the expansion of the
Humber College Lakeshore Campus through renovation and new construction into the historic
quadrangle of former hospital buildings.
The proposed agreement between the Authority, Humber College and The Province of Ontario,
provides for future public access into the park area by Kipling Avenue. Under the new agreement,
the Authority agrees to ultimately give up rights obtained under the earlier interim access
agreements.
The Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto in dealing with this matter at its meeting
held on March 8, 9 and 10, 1994, approved of the concept for development, as ultimately
approved by the Ontario Municipal Board in July 1995, for uses in this area. Clause (51 of the
recommendations as approved by Metro stated: "Metro (in this case MTRCAl will surrender its
access easements over portions of Provincial lands that will be required for other purposes". A map
of the area illustrating the subject lands is appended.
A number of land transfers are in the process of taking place as a result of the resolution of issues
between the various parties. The Agreement to be executed ensures that access to Colonel Samuel
Smith Waterfront Park will be available at all times. The eXisting legal access arrangements will
remain in place, and in effect, until such time as the permanent park access via Kipling Avenue
extension is constructed and functional to the satisfaction of Metro and the Authority.
871 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
RATIONALE
The management of these lands is compatible with the Authority objectives. Metro Toronto and
MTRCA staff have worked with the Joint Venture (MPS/Humber College) and have agreed on the
access design and funding by the developer (Joint Venture).
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Authority owned lands in this area are under management agreement with The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto. No revenue or expense will be incurred in this instance by the Authority.
Report prepared by:
Don Prince Ext. #221 and Larry Field Ext. #243
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B72
'.
-
Humber College - map
~r"'lOIj:::C~ "":l
n:n;;on: "
0 "
-,..-....-
-l~-lr"'l-lc= "":l
--:_~-l~:: 0
0=0"0= en
~r"'l~0~~ r"'l
" "":l " 0
~n~O~n 0 ~ ~
OOdCdO ~ ~
~
=r-=-l=r- 2 ;
-r-_~-r- ~
nr"'ln2n~ :;c ~
0C':l0-l0C':l en
;~~7.0;:::~ ::c
~ ~,,~ -
"":l
0
2
-l
0
-~-~.--:. _ --4-
- -=t't<
" ,
:
,
,
!
i
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I i 1.: II !
d! "'~ ~;! =I
J: 1#: iz~.e iZ'" "'l:J
=. J., -;;:~~1...",2!;
. I'~ !1li~=!1lt. %
: ./t I~-~~'~~ l!il , , ,
j :t: ~i :J~ng' ~ , , ,
Ii= ~,...: =!. 2 t r. ~
II ~i:\ ~~ < !~ .
I ~ i E ~ ;
. z ~ S
873 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
RES. #E28/96 - THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO
Appointment of Authority Members
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Joan King
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Chair of the The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority, by virtue of their position, is automatically deemed to be one of the
four Authority representatives appointed as members of The Conservation Foundation of Greater
Toronto;
AND FURTHER THAT one other Authority member be appointed at Authority Meeting #3/96 to be
held on April 26, 1996 to The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto until the Authority's
Annual Meeting in February, 1998. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Appointment of Chair of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority as a member
of The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
BACKGROUND
The Authority appoints fOur members to the Conservation Foundation. There is a need for two
additional Authority members to be appointed. The Foundation, at their Annual Meeting held on
April 10, 1996, made a motion to appoint the Chair of the Authority as a member of the
Conservation Foundation. The Authority received correspondence dated April 11, 1996 in this
regard. It is recommended, therefore, that Chair Dick O'Brien be appointed for a 3-year term,
subject to re-election as Chair of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
With the Chair's appointment, there still remains one Authority vacancy on the Foundation. It is
further recommended that an Authority member with an interest in the Foundation stand for
appointment for a 3-year term.
Report prepared by:
J. Craig Mather (ext. 2401
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B74
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
Recommended for approval at Finance and Adminstration Advisory Board Meeting #1/96, held
March 1, 1996.
RES. #E29/96 - AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES ACT
Final Version
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT the report on amendments to the Conservation Authorities Act, final version, dated February
21, 1996, be received. .............................................. CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Staff has updated Members of the Authority regularly on Bill 26; this report includes the final
version of amendments.
875 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
Recommended for approval at Finance and Adminstration Advisory Board Meeting #1/96, held
March 1, 1996.
RES. #E30/96 - MTRCA HEAL TH AND SAFETY POLICY
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT the revised MTRCA Health and Safety Policy be approved. ................. CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
To provide a revised MTRCA Health and Safety Policy that meets current guidelines.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B76
RES. #E31/96 - REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP
WATERFRONT PARK (March 1993)
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT the staff report dated April 2, 1996, advising as to the current status concerning the
Etobicoke Motel Strip land acquisitions, be received. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Updated information concerning the comprehensive assembly of the land requirements to facilitate
implementation of the Public Amenity Scheme by the Authority along the Etobicoke Motel Strip.
BACKGROUND
At Authority meeting #11/95, held on December 15, 1995, the Members of the Authority adopted
the following resolutions:
Res. #A279/95
THA T the Authority proceed with expropriation of any and all lands and property rights, as
set out in the appended Schedule "A" (pages A230-232) where satisfactory property
agreements have not been reached, to complete the Public Amenity Scheme of the
"Revised Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park (March 1993), under the
provisions of the Expropriations Act and Conservation Authorities Act;
THA T the expropriation be subject to confirmation that the Province of Ontario, The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the City of Etobicoke will provide their respective
shares of any additional costs associated with the expropriation should those costs exceed
the amount budgeted for acquisition of the Public Amenity Scheme;
AND FURTHER THA T the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation and take any other action required to obtain
possession of the lands to facilitate commencement of construction at the earliest possible
date.
877 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
AMENDMENT
Res. #A280/95
THA T Resolution #A279/95 be amended, such that the first paragraph include the following
after the words Conservation Authorities Act, "subject to Authority staff and legal counsel
being satisfied that the conditions in the existing agreements relating to approval of the
zoning by-laws can be satisfied";
AND FURTHER THA T the second paragraph be amended by inserting the words "in writing"
after the word confirmation in the first line.
THE AMENDMENT WAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
Res. #A286/95
THA T formal offers be made to all outstanding owners on the basis as presented to the
Members of the Authority at the meeting held on December 15, 1995;
THA T the Authority receive conveyance of the lands and property rights required, subject to
existing service easements;
THA T Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transactions at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the
closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements, are to be paid;
That the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary
documentation required.
AND FURTHER that staff report further to the Members of the Authority on all transactions
as finalised.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B78
At Authority Meeting #1/96 held on February 23, 1996, the Members of the Authority adopted the
following:
Resolution #A326/95
THA T the staff reports dated February 20 and 22, 1996, advising as to the current status
and proposed course of action concerning the Etobicoke Motel Strip, be received;
THA T in the event the decision of the Ontario Municipal Board dealing with the Motel Strip,
is received on or prior to February 28, 1996 and approves By-law 1994-197 in the general
form as enacted by Etobicoke Council and that all other conditions as set out in Resolutions
#A279/95 and #A280/95 have been complied with, staff is to proceed with registration of
the plans of expropriation;
THA T in the event the decision of the Ontario Municipal Board dealing with the Motel Strip
is not received on or before the deadline of February 28, 1996, staff will not proceed to
register the plans of expropriation;
AND FURTHER THA T in the event the Ontario Municipal Board approves a by-law in a form
substantially different than By-law 1994-197 as enacted by the City of Etobicoke, that staff
be directed to register the plans of expropriation only if the representatives of the funding
partners agree that the changes in the by-law do not substantially change the risks of cost
increases associated with the expropriation beyond those contemplated by the agencies
when the approvals were granted in December 1995.
CARRIED
879 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
Since February 23, 1996, the following action has taken place:
(al The Ontario Municipal Board (O.M.S.l at 2:20 p.m. on February 28, 1996, issued a
decision, on By-law 1994-197, which in the opinion of the Authority solicitors, as well as
the solicitors for the City of Etobicoke, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and The
Province of Ontario, was in the general form as enacted by Etobicoke Council;
(bl In accordance with the Approval to Expropriate, and with the concurrence of Etobicoke,
Metro, The Province and Authority solicitors, plans of expropriation were registered in the
Registry and Land Titles offices, prior to closing on February 28, 1996;
(cl On March 8, 1996, Notices of Expropriation, together with Notices of Election of Date of
Compensation and Notices of Possession were forwarded to all property owners affected.
The date of possession as included in the Notices of Possession is June 10, 1996;
(dl On March 13, 1996, the Authority was served with copy of Notice of Motion seeking Leave
to Appeal the decision of The Ontario Municipal Board issued on February 28, 1996, to the
Ontario Divisional Court from the legal firm, Davies, Howe Partners, lawyers on behalf of
Proudfoot Motels Limited;
(el On March 29, 1996, the Authority was served with the following Notices of Motion
concerning costs relating to the recently concluded O.M.B. Hearing:
(il Notice of Motion from Davies, Howe Partners on behalf of Proudfoot Motels Limited
claiming an order of costs in favour of Proudfoot against the Authority, The City of
Etobicoke, and the Province of Ontario.
(iil Notice of Motion from Michael G. DeCosimo, on behalf of V. & E. Gadzala Holdings
Limited, 412264 Ontario Ltd. and A. Edward Gadzala claiming an order for costs in
favour of Gadzala against the Authority and the Province.
(iiil Notice of Motion from Cohen Highley & Dawson on behalf of Red Carpet Inns
Limited claiming an order for costs in favour of Red Carpet Inns Limited against the
Province of Ontario or in the alternative against the Authority.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 BBD
Action to be Taken
Issue 1 O.M.B. COSTS
. The O.M.B. has set two days, April 9 and 10, 1996, for the cost issue to be argued.
The Authority solicitor, as well as solicitors for the Province of Ontario, the City of
Etobicoke and the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto will be in attendance
attempting to protect the interests of the public partners in this project.
Issue 2 LEAVE TO APPEAL DECISION OF THE O.M.B.
. The solicitors for Proudfoot Motels Limited are required to provide additional
information to prefect the Notice of Motion on or before April 12, 1996.
In the event Proudfoot decides to proceed with its request, the Authority solicitor,
together with solicitors for the other public partners in the project, will attempt to
ensure that this matter is dealt with as expeditiously as possible. In the event Leave
to Appeal is granted, this matter will come before the Divisional Court for a hearing.
Issue 3 COMPLETION OF OUTSTANDING TRANSACTIONS
. Due to the urgency of getting construction started as expeditiously as possible and
as close to June 10, 1996, as set out in the Notice of Possession served by the
Authority to the expropriated owners, it is essential that all existing agreements be
either closed as soon as possible or arrangements made for firm extensions to be
obtained.
All existing agreements with the exception of the Shore Breeze Motel Limited
agreement are subject to approval of the zoning by-law. Staff and the Authority
solicitors are in the process of attempting to make the necessary arrangements to
either close or extend all existing agreements as soon as possible.
Issue 4 EXPROPRIATION
. With the plans registered and notices forwarded to all propertyowners, the
necessary legal and appraisal work is proceeding in compliance with the
expropriation process.
Issue 5 PARK CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
. Authority staff are proceeding to finalize all the construction plans and approvals
previously requested to facilitate the necessary site preparations commencing on
June 10, 1996. This work is being coordinated with the City of Etobicoke Works
Department.
The consultants retained for the park planning and concept designs are completing
their work with a report coming to the Authority and the partners in May, 1996, for
approval of the Park Plan.
Report prepared by:
Don Prince, Ext. #221
Larry Field, Ext. 243
881 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
RES. #E32/96 - FINANCIAL ISSUES REVIEW
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT staff be directed to report to the May 10, 1996, Finance and Administration Advisory Board
Meeting #3/96, on financial issues, as requested by some member municipalities. . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Direction to staff to report to Finance and Administration Advisory Board on financial issues in
response to requests from Metro Toronto and Peel Region.
BACKGROUND
In 1993, staff was directed by the Authority to freeze the recreational funding arrangement formula
at the 1993 level for the 1994 budget year because of the Provincial governments constraint
program. Also, staff was directed to review the formula and report to the Authority prior to the
1997 budget year.
In 1996, Metro Toronto Council approved the following resolution requesting that the MTRCA
report to the Metro Environment and Open Space Committee by June 30, 1996, on:
(i) the specific plans and targets for revenue generation, programs and activities;
(ii) the costs of recreation and the extent to which each regional funding partner
benefits;
(iii) an equitable funding formula for conservation/recreation programs between Metro
and the area municipalities.
Also, Peel Region Council on February 22, 1996, approved the following resolution:
"That the Conservation Authorities form a delegation and come before Management
Committee in the near future regarding a policy for long term funding arrangements and
service levels that recognizes new provincial funding levels. "
ANALYSIS
Staff is seeking direction to prepare a report for the May 10 meeting of the Finance and
Administration Advisory Board. The report will address the foregoing funding issues Including a
process for consideration of the issues by the Authority and its member municipalities and a time
frame for implementation.
Report prepared by:
Jim Dillane, extension 220
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B82
RES. #E33/96 - DELEGATION OF SECTION 28 PERMIT APPROVAL AUTHORITY
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT Authority staff be directed to further review in greater detail, the delegation to staff of
certain approvals of applications made under Ontario Regulation 158 as one component of plan
input and review streamlining initiatives being investigated;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to report back to the Executive Committee at a future date.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Investigation of a method of streamlining the review and processing of certain types of applications
under the Authority's Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways regulation.
BACKGROUND
The Authority currently administers Ontario Regulation 158, enacted pursuant to Section 28 of the
Conservation Authorities Act. The regulation requires that applicants obtain a permit from the
Authority for prescribed fill, construction and watercourse alteration activities. The Authority has
delegated these approvals to the Executive Committee pursuant to Section 30 of the Act.
Recent changes to the Planning Act, by the province have been aimed partially at streamlining the
approvals process. As a result of the recently developed Association of Conservation Authorities of
Ontario (ACAOl business plan, Authority staff have been discussing various development service
issues with staff from the Greater Toronto Area Conservation Authorities. In particular, revised
permit administration procedures are being reviewed with the Credit Valley Conservation Authority
to explore opportunities for streamlining andlor simplifying approval processes and requirements.
These discussions will be expanded to include the other conservation authorities within the Greater
Toronto Area.
The streamlining process appears to offer benefits to both the Authority and applicants and
municipalities. For the Authority, it would result in less time being required for report and permit
preparation. Although the number of applications that would be considered for a streamlined
approval would likely be a small percentage of the total (5-10%1, the process would have an overall
efficiency benefit to the organization. For proponents, it offers the opportunity for faster approvals
for projects. Staff time freed up on minor applications could be directed to more complex ones.
For municipalities, the streamlining process would result in similar approval structures at adjacent
conservation authorities.
Many of the Authority permits are issued for minor grading works which do not require any
municipal approvals or are for structures which require a building permit. Building permits are not
approved by Council, but are approved through a staff process. As a result, many applicants,
particularly individual property owners, must wait for their permit from the Authority for several
weeks after the municipal approvals are available. Enquiries regarding opportunities to streamline
types of permit approvals were raised at seminar held for Toronto area building officials given by
Authority staff.
883 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
Staff are of the opinion that a mechanism can be found which will allow more timely approvals for
certain types of projects without compromising Authority program objectives or the technical
review of applications. Two alternatives are being discussed in this regard:
1 . Delegation of approval authority to staff for certain types of works. These applications
would be approved at a staff level and brought forward as a separate schedule to the
Executive Committee for subsequent ratification;
2. Development of a list of works which could be either exempted from approval requirements
or identified as voluntary compliance items. Works falling into this category would not
require permit applications to be made.
The types of works that could be considered for these streamlined approvals may include minor
landscaping works, accessory structures under a certain area (eg. 200 square feetl and minor
servicing works.
Guidelines would be developed outlining these works and also identifying minimum technical
standards that must apply to qualify for the streamlined approval process.
Before proceeding any further with this particular streamlining proposal, staff are requesting
direction as to whether this is an approach which could be supported by the Executive Committee.
Should such support be forthcoming, then the following work must be completed.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
If this approach is to be pursued further the following actions would be required:
. liaison with adjacent Authorities to determine consistency of approach;
. development of list of types of works;
. development of minimum technical standards;
. selection of preferred administrative procedure;
. review of proposal with Authority solicitors;
. report and adoption of revised procedure by the Executive Committee.
Report prepared by:
Richard Lloyd (ext. 2811
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B84
RES. #E34/96 - EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AND RECOGNITION AWARDS SUB-COMMITTEE
Report of Meeting #1/96, held March 29, 1996
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the 1996 Honour Roll Awards recognize the significant contributions of Chris Roberts, Mark
Wilson and The McLean Foundation to the aims and objectives of The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority;
AND FURTHER THAT a tree be planted commemorating 1996 as the Fiftieth Anniversary of the
Conservation Authorities Act. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Recommendations for the 1996 Honour Roll Awards.
BACKGROUND
The Committee met to review nominations for the 1996 Honour Roll Awards and to identify those
to be recommended for recognition on Arbor Day, April 26, 1996.
Nominations were received for:
(al Chris Roberts, nominated by Craig Mather
(bl Mark Wilson, nominated by Joan King
(cl The McLean Foundation, nominated by The Conservation Foundation of Greater
Toronto
The following information has been taken from the nominations:
Chris Roberts retired in 1995 after a long career with the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. He
worked closely with Authority staff during his years in the Parks, and later Parks and Property,
Department. As a key member of Metro's Technical Advisory Committee on Parks and
Conservation, Chris was the Authority's main staff contact for getting its projects and programs
through the budget and approval process. Chris shared the Authority's vision of a valley land and
waterfront Greenspace system based on Authority owned and Metro operated lands. With his
support and assistance, this vision became a reality.
Mark Wilson has been the inspiration to "Bring Back the Don". His dedication to the process has
been remarkable. His leadership has ensured the successful completion of the plan, Forty Steps to
a New Don, and will ensure successful implementation.
885 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
The McLean Foundation has generously and continuously supported the conservation and heritage
projects of The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto since 1964. It has funded heritage
restoratIon and development at Black Creek Pioneer Village; conservation education projects at the
Kortright Centre for Conservation; and, most recently, environmental rehabilitation through the East
Don River Environmental Rehabilitation and the Don Valley Brick Works projects and the Bartley
Smith Greenway.
No further nominations were received.
The Committee also considered a suggestion by staff that a tree be planted in recognition of the
50th Anniversary of the enactment of the Conservation Authorities Act.
Report prepared by:
Alyson Deans, ext. 269.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B86
RES. #E35/96 - APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT John Gordon Swick, Robert A. Jones, Brian Moyle and Sven Pittelkow be appointed as
Enforcement Officers for the purpose of enforcing regulations made by The Metropolitan Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority, pursuant to Section 29 of the Conservation Authorities Act;
AND FURTHER THAT the Minister of Natural Resources be requested to designate John Gordon
Swick, Robert A. Jones, Brian Moyle and Sven Pittelkow as Provincial Offences Officers.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Appointment of Enforcement Officers and designation as Provincial Offences Officers.
BACKGROUND
For the purpose of enforcing the regulations made by The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority, pursuant to Section 28( 1 )(dl of the Conservation Authorities Act, the
Authority may appoint personnel as Enforcement Officers. This appointment pertains to Ontario
Regulation 119 made under Section 29 of the Act.
It is also necessary to have our Enforcement Officers designated as Provincial Offences Officers in
order that they may commence proceedings under the Provincial Offences Act to enforce the:
. Trespass to Property Act
. Off Road Vehicles Act
. Motorized Snow Vehicles Act
. Regulations made under Section 29 of the Conservation Authorities Act
. Regulations made under the Liquor Licence Act
Report prepared by:
Dennis MacKay, Extension 218
B87 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
RES. #E36/96 . DISPOSAL/REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT the equipment items identified for replacement in 1996 be declared surplus;
AND FURTHER THAT they be disposed of by public auction. ...................... CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
The disposal of replacement equipment.
BACKGROUND
The budget, as approved by the Authority on March 29, 1996, included replacement of equipment on
the chargeback system. In accordance with the Authority's Disposal Policy, these units must be
declared surplus and if the aggregate value of items to be disposed of is estimated to be greater than
$10,000 approval of the Executive Committee of the Authority is required.
RATIONALE
The units to be replaced in 1996 are part of the Authority's chargeback system and have an estimated
value of:
Unit No. DescriDtion Estimated Value
A8040 1989 Hiway Sander $ 500.
A9046 1 986 Jim Dandy High Pressure Washer 100.
B9001 1992 Yamaha Big Bear 4x4 ATV 2,000.
02002 1 989 Ransome Outfront Rotary Mower 2,500.
F2001 1989 Ransome Outfront Rotary Mower 3,000.
F9010 1986 Yamaha ATV 1,500.
G3020 1990 John Deere 3pt Hitch Rotary Mower 250.
G9000 1986 Yamaha ATV 1,500.
L2001 1988 JD935 Outfront Rotary Mower 2,000.
M2020 1983 Roper Garden Tractor 50.
M6047 1 990 Stihl 044 Chalnsaw 50.
M9058 1991 3pt Hitch Disc 250.
W1003 1983 Ford 3600 Agric. Tractor 4.000.
Total Estimated Proceeds $ 17,700.
Report prepared by:
AI Leach, ext. 251
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B88
RES. #E37/96 - CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO
Black Creek Pioneer Village Pro Tem Committee
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT Councillor Randy Barber and Ken Owen, Director of Facilities and Operations be appointed to
represent the Authority on the Black Creek Pioneer Village Pro Tem Committee of The Conservation
Foundation of Greater Toronto;
AND FURTHER THAT these appointments be reviewed at such time as the Black Creek Pioneer
Village Business Plan Sub-committee of the Authority makes its recommendations. . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Appointment of Authority representatives to a newly formed Black Creek Pioneer Village Pro Tem
Committee.
BACKGROUND
The Authority has been requested by the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto to appoint
two representatives to the Black Creek Pioneer Village Pro Tem Committee.
The Foundation currently has two committees involved in fundraising activities for the Village. The
Campaign Planning Committee is working on the launch of the Capital Campaign which IS
attempting to raise $1.4 million for repairs and renovations to Village facilities. This committee is
designed to disband as soon as a Campaign Chair and Committee are appointed. The Black Creek
Steering Committee is involved in guiding sponsorship development activities at the Village and
supervises the work of the Development Officer. In addition, the Foundation is assisting in the
Membership Development project which was launched recently in an effort to replace $500,000 in
levy currently supporting Village operations. At the same time, the Authority has engaged the
services of Arts and Communications Counsellors to undertake a sponsorship development project
for the Village.
The Authority has established a Business Plan Sub-committee which is working on developing
strategic management directions for the Village to ensure its long term prosperity. The aim of this
sub-committee is to make recommendations as quickly as possible so that decisions can be made
and implemented in a timely fashion. The directions recommended by the sub-committee may
influence the relationship between the Authority and the Foundation in the longer term.
ANAL YSIS
The financial challenges facing the Village are substantial and require immediate action. The
initiatives currently under way by both the Foundation and Authority are critical to the viability of
the operation in 1996 and beyond and must be carried out in a coordinated manner if they are to be
effective. Consolidation of responsibility for guiding the activities of Foundation projects will help
to ensure this coordination. Representation on the Foundation's suggested Pro Tem Committee by
Authority officials will ensure coordination between Foundation and Authority activities.
889 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
Councillor Barber is currently a member of the Foundation and the Conservation and Related Land
Management Advisory Board and is well positioned to provide assistance in coordinating the efforts
of both the Foundation and the Authority. The Director of Facilities and Operations can ensure the
cooperation and coordinated effort of Authority staff which will be key to the success of the
various efforts.
The recommended Pro Tem Committee is, by design, a temporary committee to oversee the
activities which are currently proceeding. The Terms of Reference for the Committee which are
attached to this report contain a 'Sunset' review clause which provides for the review of the need
andlor function of the Committee once decisions on Village governance issues are made by the
Authority on the recommendation of the Business Plan Sub-committee.
Prepared by:
Ken Owen, Extension 255
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B90
~
--
Terms of RefElrence - Pro Tem Committee
T"""s of Rllfentnce for Pro Tem CommitttHI
l!1.!l1mD
To provide the mechanism to ensure the effective management of the Conservation Foundation's
activities with regard to Black Creek Pioneer Village and the co-ordlnatlon of these activities with The
Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
ComDosition of Committee
three members of the Conservation Foundation;
one member of MTRCA;
Ken Owen, MTRCA staff;
a maximum of two other members, as required.
ADDointmtmts to Committee
. The Chair of the Committee will be appOinted by the Executive Committee of the Conservation
Foundation;
. The Chair will name the other members of the Conservation Foundation Board to the
Committee;
. The Pro Tem Committee will appoint the Vice-Chair from among the other Conservation
Foundation members;
. The Pro Tem Committee will appoint two other members.
ResDOnsib17ititJs of the Committee
1, To mOnitor the activities of the Campaign Committee, the Sponsorship Program, and the
Membership Drive for Black Creek Village in order to avoid any inappropriate duplication of
effort and contacts;
2. To make recommendatIons to the Conservation Foundation Board (and Executive) and MTRCA
regarding the organization and management of all campaigns;
3. To provide overall superviSion of the Development Officer on behalf of the Conservation
Foundation;
4. To prOVIde guidance and assistance to the Black Creek Capital Campaign Committee.
ResDOnslb,7ities of the Pro Tem Chair
1. To represent the Conservation Foundation on the Black Creek Pioneer Village Business Plan
Sub-Committee;
2, To attend, as a temporary member, the Executive Committee meetings of the Conservation
Foundation;
3, To represent the Pro Tem Committee and the Conservation Foundation on the Black Creek
Capital Campaign Committee;
4. To work with the Conservation Foundation office to ensure co-ordination of Black Creek
Pioneer Village fundralsing activities with the other Initiatives of the Conservation Foundation;
5. To report to the Pro Tem Committee regarding the Black Creek Capital Campaign and all other
fund raising initiatives on behalf of the Village;
6. To work closely with the Campaign Development Officer In a team environment.
.Sunse,. Review of CommitttHI
The Pro Tem Committee should function until such time as the governance issue of the Pioneer Village
is settled by MTRCA, at which time the Conservation Foundation will review the need for the
continuation of the Committee into the future.
891 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
RES. #E38/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 1 58 for the period of
April 12, 1996 to April 11, 1998, for the applications, with the exception of (B) City of Missisauga,
and (M) Saint Germain Foundation of Toronto, which are listed below:
RES. #E39/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULA TION 158 (City of Mississauga)
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the period of
April 12, 1996 to April 11, 1998, for the application (B) City of Missisauga which is listed below:
AMENDMENT
RES. #E40/96 - PERMIT (B) CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
THAT Authority staff be directed to enter into discussions with staff at the City of Mississauga, to
develop a method of parking lot construction which will address water quality concerns and allow
the area to be restored to a natural condition.
THE AMENDMENT WAS ............................................. CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(bl place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such
area from some other place or places;
(cl straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B92
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
(AI Jane Anne and Harvev Snvder
To construct in a flood plain on Part East % Lot 20, Concession 3 WHS, (12407
Chinguacousy Roadl, in the Town of Caledon, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct two 9.1 metre diameter grain storage bins within the Regional Storm
flood plain of the Etobicoke Creek.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; submitted by the applicant; received on March 20, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The applicant proposes to construct two circular, metal grain storage bins east of the existing
watercourse on the property. The construction site is located within the Regional Storm flood plain
of a tributary of the Etobicoke Creek.
Control of Floodinc:
The site of the grain storage bins is located outside the hydraulic floodway. The structures will be
wet-flood proofed to the Regional Storm flood level.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works as no filling or regrading is proposed.
Conservation of Land:
There is no valley slope evident on-site.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27788 CFN :027/96/CAL
For Information contact: George Leja (Ext. 3421
Date: 1996.03.29.
(BI Citv of Mississauca
To place fill in a regulated area on Part Lot 1, Concession 3 EHS, (1035 Eglinton Avenue
Eastl, in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned
by The City of Mississauga.
The purpose is to regrade in the regulated area and flood plain of the Little Etobicoke Creek in order
to temporarily extend the existing parking lot to the north to add an additional 17 spaces to bring
the total to 62 spaces.
893 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(11 Site Plan and Railing Detail Plan; prepared by Adamson Lawson Surbray Assoc. Ltd.; Project
92-25; Drawing 92-25-3; dated revised January 31, 1996.
(21 Indemnification Agreement; by Mr. Peter Atsidakos; dated March 11, 1996;.
(31 Letter of Undertaking; from Mr. P. Atsidakos; dated March 28, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal and Backoround:
The subject application is being made by the City of Mississauga on behalf of Mr. Peter Atsidakos,
owner of a restaurant at 1035 Eglinton Avenue East (John Anderson Restaurantl. The restaurant
currently has 45 parking spaces and is experiencing parking problems resulting in traffic safety
issues. The proposal involves regrading to temporarily extend the existing parking lot to the north
(encroaching further within the valley), to add an additional 17 spaces to bring the total to 62
spaces.
The Little Etobicoke Creek is well-defined and flows north to south at the eastern limit of the site.
A tributary ravine enters into the Little Etobicoke Creek, flowing west tc ~ast, at the northern end
of the site.
In 1991, Mr. Atsidakos applied to the City of Mississauga to rezone the property for commercial
use (its original designation was agricultural). Over three quarters of the area was deemed open
space consisting of valleylands. Because of the small size of the development area, the applicant
had difficulty accommodating the required number of parking spaces (451. The City's Official Plan
requires that all open space lands identified through development applications be deeded to the
City. The applicant proposed that the City allow him to extend his parking into the flood plain at
the north to obtain the required number of spaces. An agreement was reached between the City,
Authority and the applicant which consisted of the following:
. All flood plain lands were deeded to the City;
. An area within the flood plain of the tributary ravine where flood depths were less than 0.5
metres with zero velocity (0.02 hectaresl was leased back to the applicant to obtain an
additional 9 parking spaces allowing the applicant to achieve the required 45 spaces. This
criteria was chosen as it complied with the Authority Parking Lot Policy and flood proofing
criteria (1985). This area was also zoned greenbelt (exceptionl as required by the Parking
Lot Policy.
. The Authority issued a permit for regrading in the flood plain and Fill Regulated Area to
allow for the creation of the 9 parking spaces in accordance with the Parking Lot Policy
(June 12, 1992; Permit C-920971.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B94
The restaurant has been a success and as a result the applicant has experienced a parking shortage
during peak hours. The applicant initiated further discussions with City and Authority staff at the
end of 1994 with regard to further expansion of the parking lot into the flood plain. The Authority
had adopted the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program in October 1994 and this
document deleted provisions for commercial parking lots in valleylands. Authority staff advised
that further expansion of the parking lot into the flood plain would be contrary to Authority policy.
Staff further advised that since the lands in question were now owned by the City, an application
from the City would require a resolution from Council recognizing the non-conforming nature of the
application. This is as a result of Executive Committee Resolution #E188/84 which was adopted in
1984 and states:
"THA T municipalities within the Authority's area of jurisdiction be informed that any
application for permit under Ontario Regulation 170 which does not conform to Authority
policy shall be accompanied by a resolution of Council making formal application and
acknowledging the municipality's awareness of the non-conforming nature of the
application. "
The City had filed a preliminary application for this proposal in January 1995. This application
involved a proposal for 25 additional parking spaces. As a result of this advice, a report was
prepared at the City for General Committee of Council which passed the following Resolution #GC-
526-95 in August 1995:
"1. That the request of Mr. P. Atsidakos to extend his parking lot at 1035 Eglinton
Avenue East entirely at his cost, onto the adjacent City owned greenbelt lands be
acknowledged, and referred to the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (MTRCA) for its approval of the application dated January 4, 1995
requesting parking in the floodplain.
2. That the applicant (Mr. P. Atsidakos) be required to submit an application for minor
variance to Committee of Adjustment for the proposed parking on greenbelt lands
upon approval of MTRCA.
3. That Mr. P. A tsidakos enter into a Save Harmless Agreement to the satisfaction of
the City Solicitor's Office to be registered on title on the subject lands and also a
lease agreement, prior to commencement of any construction of the extension of
the proposed parking lot within the greenbelt lands. "
RATIONALE
The current application involves the placement of asphalt and curbs in order to construct an
additional 17 parking spaces on a temporary basis within the tributary ravine. The amount of fill is
minimal as there is minimal alteration to existing grades. All 17 additional parking spaces proposed
are within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Little Etobicoke Creek, which is at an elevation of
140.4 metres C.G.D. in this area. Flood depths on the proposed spaces range between 0.4 and
1.7 metres. Regional velocities are near zero in this area as it is a backwater north of Eglinton
Avenue. Part of the area is also subject to flooding under 5-100 year storm conditions (elevation
139.5 metresl. The spaces are not located in the area deemed to be the hydraulic flood way (main
conveyance areal of the Little Etobicoke Creek.
895 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
The approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (19941 allows only at grade parking
facilities associated with local or regional recreational uses (Section 4.1.2.1. The subject parking is
not associated with recreational uses. At the time the original parking lot encroachment was
approved, it complied with the maximum allowable encroachment based on Authority floodproofing
criteria.
Staff have undertaken extensive negotiations with the agent for the proponent and with City staff
in an attempt to find a resolution acceptable to all parties. In particular, Authority staff requested
that opportunities to resolve the parking and traffic issues through agreements with adjacent
landowners be investigated. These negotiations have resulted in the following changes to the
original proposal:
- 8 parking spaces were deleted from the proposal in the area of the hydraulic flood way and
a guardrail was added along the eastern limit of the parking area in order to address the
concern of vehicles floating offsite and blocking the downstream culvert;
- the lot is to be temporary for a period of not more than three years. The proponent is
negotiating with the landowner to the west for a long term parking solution. Valleyland
restoration and plantings will be implemented for this area at the time their permanent
solution is developed;
- The owner has signed a hold harmless agreement releasing the Authority from liability in the
event of flood and erosion damages and has provided proof of liability insurance in the
amount of $ 2,000,000 naming the City and Authority as insured. This document will be
registered on title of the lands.
It is recommended that a policy exception can be granted in this instance to allow for the
temporary encroachment to address the City's concerns and to allow time for a permanent
resolution to be implemented.
CFN: 26796 Appl.#:005/95/MISS
Report prepared by: Richard Lloyd (extension 2811
Date: 1996.04.02
(Cl Anthonv Del Rizzo and Sabrina Dussin
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 22, Registered Plan M-1111, (164 Riverside Drive-
Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a new 268.3 square metre single family dwelling within the Regional
Storm flood plain of the East Humber River.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B96
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Associated Design Group Inc.; Project #9603; Drawings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
and 7 dated February 1996; received April 1,1996.
(2) Structural Floodproofing Analysis; prepared by J. Bruce Neil, P.Eng., dated March 26, 1996;
received April 1, 1996.
RA TIONALI:
The application was revi<;!wed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The proposal consists of demolishing an existing hou~e and constructing a new two-storey, single
family dwelling. The new home will essentially match the square footage of the existing dwelling.
The subject property is located within the Regional Storm flood plain of the East Humber River and
the Woodbridge Special Policy Area (SPAl. No fill placement is proposed as part of the works.
Control of Floodino:
A structural analysis has been submitted, detailing that the new structure will be dry-passively
flood proofed to the Regional Storm level.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be grass seeded (or soddedl following construction.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal complies with the Woodbridge SPA (Vaughan Official Plan Amendment #440) and the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section 4.2.1 -
Development/Redevelopment within established communities.
CFN: 27857 Appl. #:045/96N AUG
For Information contact: George Leja (ext. 3421
Date: 1996.04.01.
CDI Dieter Brandes
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 1, Registered Plan 4591, (8 Bonnyview Drive), in the
City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a new 5.8 metre by 6.4 metre detached garage within the Regional
Storm flood plain of the Mimico Creek.
897 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan and Elevation Drawings; prepared by G.S. Designers Limited; dated March 1996;
received March 12, 1996.
(2) Letter of Undertaking from Mr. Dieter Brandes; regarding Acknowledgement of Structural
Floodproofing Analysis Prior to Issuance of Permit; dated and received March 25, 1996_
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following inforrntlt1c,1I:
Prooosal:
The proposal consists of replacing an exist!n:;J sint1'~ car garage, presently in a deteriorating
condition, with a new detached strlJccure. The proposed detached garage will be shifted to the
south side of the property. The entire site is located within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill
Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek. No fill placement is proposed as part of the works.
Control of Floodino:
The site of the new, detached garage is at the same geodetic elevation as the location of the
existing structure. The new building will be wet-floodproofed to the Regional Storm level.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works.
Conservation of Land:
The site is located on the valley floor. Slope stability is not a concern.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.2.2(Dl - ReplacemellL Structures - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27852 Appl.#: 047/96/ETOB
For Information contact: George Leja (ext. 3421
Date: 1996.04.01
lEI Santek Investments Inc.
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Part Lots 6 and 7,
Concessions 3 and 4 KR, (21 Old Mill Roadl, in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a hotel addition to the Old Mill Restaurant which includes preservation
of the historic Old Mill ruins located within the Regulatory Storm flood plain.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B98
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plans, Floor Plans and Elevations; prepared by Adrian Peel Architect; Drawings SP1,
SP2, SP3, SP4, SP11, SP12, SP13, SP14; SP16 and SP17; dated March 1995.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Backaround and ProDosal
In November 1993 staff received a preliminary proposal for a hotel addition to the Old Mill
Restaurant located on the bank of the Humber River north of Bloor Street West in the City of
Etobicoke. The proposal included the preservation of the historic Old Mill ruins and the conversion
of these ruins into a 6 storey hotel located within the fringe of the Regional Storm flood plain; the
construction of a new hotel partially located on tableland and partially below the crest of the valley
slope connecting to the preserved mill ruins; and the construction of a new flagstone driveway
within the Regional Storm flood plain.
Staff met with the proponent and his consultant and expressed a number of concerns relating to
Flood and Erosion risk management and the ability to provide safe access pursuant to the Provincial
Flood Plain Planning Policy Statement (1988).
In January 1994 the proponent submitted a revised concept plan which attempted to address
andlor minimize concerns expressed by staff. The revised proposal reduced the length of the new
hotel structure so that no habitable areas projected within the Regional Storm flood plain.
However, the structure would still extend below the top-of-bank of the modified valley slope. A
glazed bridge connection between the existing ruins and the proposed hotel structure would be
provided.
This revised preliminary proposal was presented to the Water and Related Land Management Board
at Meeting #2/94, April 15, 1994 and the Authority at Meeting #3/94, April 22, 1994 at which
time the following Resolution #A82/94 was approved.
"THA T the staff report concerning the proposed addition to the Old Mill Restaurant and
restoration of the historic mill ruins be received;
THA T another staff report on the final proposal for the Old Mill Restaurant be brought back
to the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board prior to going to the Executive
Committee for permit approval.
THA T staff comment in the future report on indemnification of the Authority by the
proponent from any claims for flood and erosion damage and loss of life associated with the
development.
AND FURTHER THA T staff be directed to continue to work with the proponent and his
consultants to finalize a satisfactory proposal for consideration by the Executive Committee
under Ontario Regulation 158."
Based on the direction from the Authority, staff continued to work with the proponent and his
consultant throughout 1994/95 to arrive at an acceptable proposal.
899 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
The final proposal will permit the development of a 62 suite inn to operate in conjunction with the
existing Old Mill Restaurant. The inn is intended to provide overnight accommodation for those
individuals currently using the Old Mill restaurant and banquet/meeting facilities. The project will
result in the preservation of the Old Mill ruins which will house the main reception areas for the inn
and 15 luxury suites. The stone walls of the ruins will be restored with a new roof being
constructed to create a building height of 5 storeys.
The ruins are located entirely within the Regional Storm flood plain. Pursuant to the Provincial
Flood Plain Planning Policy Statement, the Authority has adopted a "One Zone" approach to flood
plain management whereby new development in the flood plain is to be prohibited or restricted.
The Authority's Flood Susceptible Sites Policy, which was in place at the time of receipt of the
preliminary proposal, recognized existing buildingslstructures within the flood plain and allowed for
minor additions and replacements subject to the proponent providing a level of floodproofing. The
policy was silent on the preservation of historic ruins located in the flood plain that are associated
with a redevelopment proposal. In October 1994 the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Mangement Program was approved. A new policy was added to allow for the replacement or
reconstruction of existing buildings or structues of architectural or historical importance. Regional
Flood protection will be provided to the ruins. All habitable areas will be located above the Regional
Storm flood elevation. The balance of the suites will be accommodated in a new guest wing
addition to be constructed outside the Regional Storm flood plain.
The proposed new hotel structure will marginally encroach below the top-of-bank of a modified
valley. The valley has been modified by past construction. For lands immediately adjacent to
valleys, the Authority, based on the policy in place at the time of receipt of the preliminary
proposal, required that buildings or structures (including paved surfaces) be setback a minimum
distance of 10 metres from the top-of-bank of stable valley slopes unless studies by a competent
profeSSional shows that the structures will be safe during their life and the buildings or structures
will not aggravate or create erosion problems. Staff has received and reviewed a geotechnical
study and are satisfied that the proposed new inn wing will not have a detrimental impact on the
valley slope. A glazed bridge structure would connect the new wing with the restored ruins.
A new flagstone driveway will be constructed along the fringe of the Regional Storm flood plain to
allow vehicular access from Old Mill Road to the inn. Filling to accommodate the driveway will be
kept to a minimum and safe access will be provided pursuant to the Provincial Flood Plain Planning
Policy Statement.
In 1983, the Old Mill ruins were designated as a historical structure under By-law 83-109, pursuant
to the Ontario Heritage Act. The proposed restoration of the Old Mill ruins will allow for the
preservation and enhancement of one of Etobicoke's most significant historical structures. The
applicant has designed the reconstruction of the ruins and the proposed guest wing to complement
the historical architectural styling of the Old Mill Restaurant through the reuse of river stone, timber
and stucco. Both the Etobicoke Historical BoardlLocal Architectural Conservation Advisory
Committee and The Etobicoke Historical Society have reviewed the details of the application and
are in support of the project.
The final proposal was presented to the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board at
Meeting #2/95, April 21, 1995 and to the Authority at Meeting #3/95, April 28, 1995 at which
time the following Resolution #A88/95 and Amendment #A89/95 were passed:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B100
"THA T the staff report concerning the proposed addition to the Old Mill Restaurant and
restoration of the historic ruins be received;
AND FURTHER THA T staff report to the June 2, 1995 Board meeting on any future
indemnification for any claims for flood and erosion damage and loss of life associated with
this development. II
AMENDMENT
"THA T the applicant be requested to make a presentation to the next meeting of the
Humber Watershed Task Force.
AND FURTHER THA T Etobicoke Council be requested to include input from the Humber
Watershed Task Force in their disposition of conditions # 11, # 12 and # 13 regarding Site
Plan Approval contained in Clause 83-D-95 of the Eighth Report of the Planning and
Development Committee, adopted by Etobicoke Council on April 18, 1995 and attached as
pages A 65-A 66. "
Conditions 11, 12 and 13 are as follows:
11. Submission of a detailed assessment of the significance and structural condition of the Old
Mill ruin to be carried out in consultation with the LACAC and MCTR by a consultant whose
expertise extends to matters dealing with historic masonry structures, to the satisfaction of
the Commissioner of Planning;
12. Submission of an archaeological assessment of the part of the site to be affected by the
proposed undertaking to be carried out be a qualified consultant licensed under the Ontario
Heritage Act, in consultation with the LACAC and MCTR , to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner of Planning.
13. Submission of a plan to be developed and implemented to in consultation with the LACAC
and MCTR to mitigate unavoidable impact to the heritage resources on the property as a
result of the proposed development, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Planning.
At a meeting of the Humber Watershed Task Force (Meeting #4/95, May 16, 1995) the applicant
made a presentation to the Task Force on this proposal at which time the following Resolution
#28/95 was adopted.
"THA T the staff report concerning the proposed addition to the Old Mill Restaurant and
restoration of the historic ruins be received;
AND FURTHER THA T the members of the Humber Watershed Task Force provide any
comments they have regarding the proposal for the historic mill ruins to Etobicoke Council
in their disposition of conditions # 11, # 12 and # 13 regarding Site Plan Approval contained
in Clause 83-D-95 of the Eighth Report of the Planning and Development Committee
adopted by Etobicoke Council on April 18, 1995 and attached as pages A 65-A 66. "
8101 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
In response to direction received at Authority Meeting #3/94, staff requested that the firm of
Gardner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, draft a Liability Reduction Agreement indemnifying the
Authority from any actions, suits, claims, demands and proceedings, by the Owner, for flood and
erosion damage and loss of life associated with the Old Mill development. The agreement is similar
to that used by the Authority regarding golf course development within valley and stream corridors.
In addition, the agreement requires that the Owner arrange for public .;ability and property damage
insurance coverage naming the Authority as insured.
The draft agreement was presented to the Water and Related Land Management Board at Meeting
#4/95, August 18,1995 and the Authority at Meeting #7/95, August 25,1995 at which time the
following Resolution #A 192/95 was adopted.
"THA T staff be directed to proceed with the execution of the Liability Reduction
Agreement. "
We are in receipt of a copy of the executed agreement.
Control of Floodina:
As the existing footprint of the ruins located within the flood plain will not be increased and filling
will be minimal impacts on the control of flooding will be minimal.
Pollution:
Construction hoarding and siltation controls will be implemented during the construction period.
Conservation of Land:
A geotechnical report has been submitted with the proposal which indicates slope stability will not
be negatively impacted. All disturbed areas will be seeded on completion.
Policv Guidelines:
Safe access will be provided pursuant to the Provincial Flood Plain Planning Policy Statement
(1988). Section 4.2.2 (D) Replacement Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program (1994) allows for the replacement or reconstruction of existing flood prone
buldings or structures of architectural or historical importance.
CFN: 25138.6 Appl. #:060/96/ETOB
For information contact: Barry Knox (ext. 268)
Date: 1996.04.02
IF) Lisa Alfreda Romano
To place fill in a regulated area on Lots 67 and 68, Registered Plan 2027, (20 Stockdale
Crescent), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill and regrade to facilitate the construction of a residential structure..
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B102
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Key Plan, Lot Plan, Site Plan, 20 Stockdale eres., Town of Richmond Hill; prepared by
Giorgio P. Realini, Architect; Job #95-08; Drawing #1; received March 7, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The applicant is proposing to develop an existing lot adjacent to the East Don River Valley and in a
Fill Regulated Area. Some minor regrading is required to raise portions of the lot one to two feet to
provide lot drainage.
Control of Floodina:
The work is not in the flood plain and will not affect the control of flooding
Pollution:
The works will not affect pollution.
Conservation of Land:
A sediment fence is to be erected a minimum of 1.5 metres from the top of bank to protect the
valley slope and mature vegetation. Runoff from the rear of the site will continue over the slope as
sheet drainage and will not cause erosion. The house is set back a minimum of 10 metres from the
top of the stable valley slope.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.2.2 (G) Infilling.
CFN: 27855 Appl.#:044/96/RH
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.04.02.
IGI Citv of North York - Parks and Recreation DeDartment
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 14 and 15, Concession 1 WYS, (17 Raoul
Wallenberg Road), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property
owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to place fill in order to re-contour an existing ski hill which is partially within the Fill
Regulated Area.
8103 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Earl Bales Park, North York Ski Centre Beginner Hill Redevelopment Plan; prepared by City
of North York; Project 2770; Drawings 2G and 2H; as received on May 19, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The applicant proposes to place fill in order to change the grades on an existing ski hill which is
partially within the Fill Regulated area. The changes will make the ski hill less dangerous by
creating a greater run out area. The ski hill is not located within the valley corridor but is oriented
in an east to west direction away from the top-of-bank on the west side of the Don River valley.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be erected between the top-of-bank of the Don River valley and the proposed
works.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no impact on the conservation of land. All disturbed areas adjacent to the top-of-
bank and within the Fill Regulated Area will be planted in accordance with the landscape plan
provided by the applicant. Staff have reviewed the proposed grading and are satisfied that it will
have no impact on the existing stable valley.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.2 - Existing Resource Based Uses of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27884 Appl. #:050/96/NY
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.04.02.
(HI The Citv of York - Parks DeDartment
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on Part Lot 8, Concession 3
FTH, (Smythe Park), in the City of York, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to place granular fill and asphalt for road reconstruction works and to undertake
pond modification works in a regulated area and flood plain of the Black Creek..
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B104
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by City of York - Parks Department; Project PK 96-117; Drawings L 1, L2
dated January 22, 1996.
(2) Letter from N. Melman, Manager of Planning and Development, City of York, Parks and
Recreation Department; dated February 26. 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
To reconstruct the existing Smythe Park access road and parking lots, reconstruct existing catch
basins in order to improve road drainage and construct a weir structure in an existing pond in order
to Improve water quality. The works are intended to improve the existing park and are being
undertaken through funding from the federal infrastructure program.
Control of Floodina:
The road reconstruction involves the importation of approximately 2400 cubic metres of material
into the Black Creek flood plain. The maximum grade change on the road and parking lot is 1
metre. The average grade change is approximately 0.3 metres. The proposed filling has been
reviewed by staff and determined to not impact flood levels outside the boundaries of the park
property.
Pollution:
Road drainage from the adjacent Edinborough Court is to be directed to a modified pond on the
valley floor which will allow for sediment removal. The watercourse will be protected from
sedimentation by fencing where grades require.
Conservation of Land:
As part of the rehabilitation of the park, the City will be undertaking an extensive planting plan this
summer in order to increase the number of native trees and shrubs in the valley. The letter of
undertaking refers to this plan. The works on the pond weir will also be undertaken at this time.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
Section 4.2.2 H) - Existing resource based uses. The plan for the park has also been developed in
consultation with the Humber Task Force and the Black Creek project.
CFN: 27824 Application: 39/96/YORK
For Information contact: Richard Lloyd, Ext. 281
Date: 1996.03.27.
8105 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
II) MetroDolitan Toronto - TransDortation DeDartment
To construct in a flood plain at various locations along the Don Valley Parkway from
Lawrence Avenue to Wynford Drive, in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed as located
on property owned by same.
The purpose is to repair five existing culverts which convey flows from small tributaries flowing into
the Don River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Don Valley Parkway Plans; prepared by Metropolitan Toronto Transportation Department;
Drawings P1084-4, P1085-104 and P1085-105; as received March 28, 1996.
(2) Metro Toronto Contract Specifications; prepared by Buttress-Loc, Duratron Systems Ltd.;
Contract T -4296; received March 28, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The applicant proposes to repair existing culverts which convey flows from small drainage
tributaries flowing into the Don River. The culverts are beneath the Don Valley Parkway at five
locations. The works are within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm floodplain. The repair
works will involve the removal of debris and the placement of a plastic liner within the existing
culverts. Access to the site will be gained from the Don Valley Parkway which will be closed
during construction.
Control of Floodina:
There will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be erected on the downstream side of tributaries which abut the Don River.
This fencing will remain in place for the duration of the works.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no impact on the conservation of land.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27900 Appl.#: 058/96/TOR
For Information contact: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.04.01
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B106
(J) Unionville Golf Centre Inc.
To place fill in a regulated area on Part Lots 9 and 10, Concession 5, (44 Main Street), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to extend an existing driving range in a fill regulated area..
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Existing Tee-off Area Plan, Unionville Golf Centre, prepared by the applicant, received
March 4, 1996.
(2) Proposed Changes to Range Tee Plan, Unionville Golf Centre, prepared by the applicant,
received March 4, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The Unionville Golf Centre is proposing to extend the length of the driving range. Although much
of the driving range is in the flood plain, the filling for the extension is in the Fill Regulated Area and
not the flood plain. Three to four inches of top soil will be placed for sodding, and gravel will be
placed to relocate the driveway access.
Control of Floodina:
The works will not affect the control of flooding.
Pollution:
The works are not near the watercourse and do not pose a risk of pollution.
Conservation of Land:
The site is part of the existing golf course development. There are no significant natural resource
features at the site.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.2.2 (E), Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures.
CFN: 27901 Appl. #:05 7/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.04.02.
8107 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
IKI Citv of Toronto
To place fill in a regulated area at the Eastern Beaches in the City of Toronto, Lake Ontario
Waterfront as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to re-construct the boardwalk along a new alignment to address user safety issues..
(1 ) Red-line Revision - Kew Bank Boardwalk and Martin Goodman Trail Realignment; prepared
by City of Toronto, Department of Parks and Recreation; Drawings L 1 and L2; received April
4, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The City of Toronto is proposing to re-construct a 580 metre section of the Eastern Beaches
Boardwalk and part of the Martin Goodman Trail between Ashbridges Bay and Scarborough Beach
Boulevard. The boardwalk will be aligned a maximum of 18 metres further onto the beach. The
area behind the boardwalk will be filled in and the Martin Goodman Trail relocated in the filled area.
The boardwalk and trail re-Iocation is to alleviate congestion around a concession stand where the
trails meet. Other options to relocate the trail away from the beach are not viable because of
existing park and residential development.
Control of Floodina:
It is Authority staff's opinion that the proposed location of the boardwalk is within the 100 year
flood level for Lake Ontario. There is documented evidence of flooding on the beach as recently as
1993. The City is preparing a wave up-rush analysis to determine the increased flood risk. ThIs
report will contribute to any design or alignment modifications that may be required.
Conservation of Land:
Authority staff have identified erosion sites at the east and west ends of the proposed trail re-
construction, especially the east end. The City has been monitoring the erosion at the eastern end
since the installation of storm water detention tanks in 1994 and is currently doing a study to
address the erosion concern.
The proposed trail merges into the existing trail at the east and west ends, and is not significantly
different from the existing alignment at these locations. In this regard the risk from erosion at
these locations is not significantly increased.
In the area between the east and west ends, the nature and extent of the erosion risk is unclear.
As part of the consultant's study, the increased risk to erosion in this area will be assessed.
Following an assessment of the wave up-rush analysis Authority staff will assist in a redesign of the
boardwalk structure to minimize the erosion risk, if required.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B108
Policv Guidelines:
Pursuant to provincial policy the existing and proposed alignment of the boardwalk and the Martin
Goodman Trail are within the regulatory shoreline. In cases of replacement of an existing structure
withm the Regulatory Shoreline, the provincial shoreline policy requires that the risks be managed.
The impact of flooding and erosion risks will be managed through design, and a commitment by the
City of Toronto to the long term maintenance of the boardwalk and trail.
CFN: 27902 Appl.#:059/96/TOR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.04.02.
III Borouah of East York
To construct in a flood plain at Taylor Creek Park and the Don River, in the Borough of East
York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to repair a collapsed sanitary culvert on the valley side slope of the Taylor Creek
within the Fill Regulated Area.
(1 ) Site Location and Details; prepared by the City of East York Engineering Department;
Contract 96-040; Figures 1, 2, 3 and S1; as received on April 10, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The applicant is proposing to repair a collapsed storm sewer located on the valley side slope of the
Taylor Creek. The storm sewer has been in place for more then 20 years and has failed leaving a
large scar on the slope. The scar if allowed to continue to erode will cause the collapse of an
adjacent sanitary sewer. The erosion scar will be repaired and the failed culvert replaced.
A temporary crossing of the watercourse is proposed to access the site because of the requirement
of frequent crossings of equipment. The access will consist of the placement of culverts covered
with stone. The works will be completed in approximately one week.
Control of Floodina:
The site will be restored to original conditions. As a result, there will be no impact on the control
of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the work site and remain in place during
construction. The culvert and stone to be placed across the watercourse for the temporary access
will be removed upon completion of the works. Sediment fencing will also be placed between the
outlet of the sanitary sewer and the watercourse.
8109 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
Conservation of Land:
The site will be revegetated through the use of plant material in accordance with landscape plans
submitted by the applicant.
Pollcv Guidelines:
The works are in accordance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: Appl.#:
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.04.02.
1M) Saint Germain Foundation of Toronto
To place fill in a Fill Regulated Area on Part Lot 26, Concession 1, (234 Steeles Avenue E.),
In the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
Withdrawn by staff.
IN) Susan Zikman
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 2, Registered Plan 4834, (39 Dove Lane), in the
Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to excavate a crawl space for a proposed addition to an existing residential structure
in a Fill Regulated Area.
(1 ) Red-line Revision, Propos€d Addition to 39 Dove Lane, Site Plan, Basement Plan; prepared
by Kirkor Architects and Planners; Drawing A 1; received March 29, 1996.
(2) Proposed Addition to 39 Dove Lane, Second Floor Plan, Roof Plan, Elevation Plan; prepared
by Kirkor Architects and Planners; Drawings A2 and A3; received March 29, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The applicant is proposing to construct an addition onto an existing residential structure which is at
the edge of and over the crest of a valley slope and in a Fil. :::;'egulated Area. The proposed addition
is to be located on the tableland, 5 metres back from the crest of slope. There is to be a crawl
space excavated under the addition. The proposed addition is less than 50% of the size of the
existing structure.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B110
Conservation of Land:
A geotechnical assessment was undertaken in support of this application. The report indicated that
the slope was stable and that the proposed works would not be affected by, nor affect the stability
of the slope.
All work will be conducted from the tableland, and a fence will be erected to protect the slope.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.2.2 (C) Minor Additions.
CFN: 27748 Appl.#: 018/96/MARK
For Information contact: Mary Asselstine (Ext. 304)
Date: 1996.04.01.
101 MuniciDalitv of MetroDolitan Toronto - Works DeDartment
To alter a watercourse south of Ellesmere Road between Military Trail and Morningside
Avenue, in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located on property
owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to undertake works in the Highland Creek to protect an exposed sanitary sewer at
two different sites.
(1 ) Red-line Revision, East Highland Creek Exposed Sewer Pipe Erosion Protection; prepared by
Metro Works; Drawing #95-642; received March 27, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
A sanitary sewer has been exposed in the bed of the Highland Creek at two locations. Metro
Works is proposing to protect the sewers using a low weir structure to provide a grade control on
the downstream side.
Control of Floodina:
The control of flooding will not be affected.
Pollution:
A raised gabion pad will be placed in the watercourse from which heavy equipment will work. The
work is to be undertaken under low flow conditions and done as quickly as possible. These
practices will minimise suspension of sediments.
Conservation of Land:
The weir is designed to allow fish passage.
8111 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
There is existing access partway to the sites from Ellesmere Road. The access road will be
continued along the valley floor where there is no significant woody vegetation. The road access
will be restored with topsoil and seed following construction, and the riparian area will be enhanced
with plantings.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
as it relates to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 27899 AppJ.#:055/96/SCAR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.04.02
(PI Yonae Bavview Holdinas Inc.
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 36 and 37, Concession 1, (East side of Yonge Street,
north of Highway #7), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to provide a temporary crossing of a small tributary of the East Don River and to
ultimately pipe this tributary.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Red-line Revision, Area Grading and Sediment Control Plan, Bayview Glen Community;
prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd.; Contract 10-95032; Drawing SC-1; received
April 4, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The applicant is initiating earth works for the development of lands north of Highway #7 and east
of Yonge Street. To undertake -~e first phase of the earth works, a temporary crossing of an
intermittent tributary of the Do'": River is required. The crossing will be a 30 m extension to an
existing 1250 mm culvert under the CNR tracks. 'Ultimately the watercourse will be enclosed in a
pipe.
The existing watercourse drains less than 125 ha, and originates in agricultural fields on the east
side of the railway tracks where the channel is ill-defined. The watercourse channel is generally
well defined downstream of the tracks for approximately 380 m, where it enters the storm sewer
system, and is conveyed to the site of a future storm water quality pond. The water course
formerly fed into the Don system on the west side of Yonge Street but was cut off when Yonge
Street was upgraded.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96, April 12, 1996 B112
There appears to be no existing fish population in the watercourse; however, the Ministry of
Natural Resources is reviewing the concept of piping the watercourse under the authority of the
Federal Fisheries Act.
Current planning approvals, zoning and designations do not provide for the protection of the
watercourse and stream corridor. Development proposals currently include the Regional Go Transit
Station, the site of which is supported by the Provincial Government. Required road networks
reduce the opportunity to protect the stream corridor. Furthermore, the storm water management
strategy for the entire development area results in the diversion of most of the water away from
the tributary.
Authority staff support the temporary crossing of the watercourse and the ultimate piping.
Pollution:
Two sediment traps will be placed in the watercourse prior to the construction of the temporary
crossing. The downstream water quality pond will be constructed prior to the piping of the
watercourse which will treat the site for sediment control during construction.
Conservation of Land:
Associated with the small watercourse is a woodlot made up of a mixture of upland forest, a black
walnut stand and successional growth. Through discussions with Authority, Region of York and
Town of Richmond Hill staff the developer has agreed to protect the upland forest portion of the
woodlot, a forest community which is poorly represented in the area. The Town has committed to
the long term maintenance of this forest stand.
The Langstaff District Master Servicing Plan did not address treatment of storm water for water
quality. Authority staff has been reviewing a new secondary plan submission for the Langstaff
District and through this process and subsequent subdivision applications will be requesting that
opportunities for storm water quality treatment be investigated. In support of this, a storm water
quality pond was proposed and approved at the corner of Yonge Street and Highway #7.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposed works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program as it relates to Section 3.3 (Policies and Procedures for Identifying
Watercourses and Alterations).
CFN: 27908 Appl.#:064/96/RH
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (Ext. 304)
Date: 1996.04.10.
8113 April 12, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/96
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11 :30 a.m., January 12, 1996.,
Richard O'Brien J. Craia Mather
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
pI.
~
"the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #3/96 Page B114
May 10,1996
The Executive Committee met in the South Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, May 10,
1996. The Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m.
PRESENT
Michael Oi Biase ........................................................ Member
Lois Griffin ............................................................ Member
Lois Hancey ................................................. Vice Chair, Authority
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Joan King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard O'Brien. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair, Authority
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard Whitehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
RES #E41/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #2/96, held April 12, 1996 be approved. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
RES #E42/96 - MEMBERSHIP
Renewal of Members - The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto appoints
members for a three year term.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the membership renewal of
James W. Keenan to The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto be approved for a three-year
term May 29, 1996 to May 28, 1999;
AND FURTHER THAT the membership of William R. Uvingston to The Conservation Foundation of
Greater Toronto be approved for a three-year term September 8, 1996 to September 7, 1999.
B115 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
AMENDMENT
RES #E43/96
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THA T paragraph one of the main motion be deleted and replace with the following:
... THA T the membership renewal of James W. Keenan to The Conservation
Foundation of Greater Toronto be approved for a three-year term
May 29, 1996 to May 28, 1999;
THE AMENDMENT WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At the Conservation Foundation's Board of Directors meeting #1/96, Wednesday, April 10, 1996,
"UPON MOTION duly made by K. Van Kempen and seconded by R. J. Burgar, IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY
RESOLVED THAT the following Conservation Foundation memberships be renewed for the terms
indicated, subject to the necessary approval of the Conservation Authority:
J. W. Keenan May 29, 1996 - May 28, 1999
W. R. Livingston September 8, 1996 - September 7, 1999
Approval is now being requested to comply with the guidelines set out in the Conservation
Foundation's Charter and By-Laws.
For information contact:
Waneeta Robertson, extension 276
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B116
RES #E44/96 - GARY ROBINSON
Receipt of a request from Gary Robinson to relocate an existing Authority Right-of-
Way in the. Goodwood Area of the Township of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of
Durham.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THE EXECUTIVE COMMIITEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from Gary Robinson to relocate an existing Authority
Right-of-Way located on his property in the Goodwood Area of the Township of Uxbridge, Regional
Municipality of Durham;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate
with Gary Robinson in this instance;
THAT the Authority enter into an exchange of Right-of-Ways on the following basis:
(1) The Authority will release its interest in the parcel of land containing 0.4 acres, more or less,
being Part of Lot 15, Concession 2, Township of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of Durham;
(2) Gary Robinson will convey to the Authority a Right-of-Way containing 0.4 acres, more or less,
being Part of Lot 15, Concession 2, Township of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of Durham,
designated as Parts 4, 5, 8 and 11 on Plan 40R-15731;
(3) Gary Robinson is to pay to the Authority $1,000.00 to cover the Authority's administration
costs for processing this transaction;
(4) Gary Robinson is to be responsible for payment of all survey, legal and other costs associated
with completing this transaction;
(5) Completion of this transaction is subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be required
being obtained at no cost to the Authority.
THAT the said release of Right-of-Way is subject to obtaining the approval of the Minister of Natural
Resources in accordance with Section 21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the
execution of any documents. .............................................. CARRIED
B117 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
BACKGROUND
In 1957, the Authority acquired a permanent easement from Agnes and Forrest Johnson for the
purpose of constructing sewer drains and pipes for water. This easement relates to a force main outlet
from the Goodwood pumping station. A Right-of-Way was obtained at that time for access for
construction and maintenance of the works.
In 1994 a subsequent owner Gary Robinson severed this property into 5 parcels ranging in size from
approximately 2 to 7 acres. The Authority's Right-of-Way roughly bisects two of the severed parcels.
While it appears these two lots are still buildable, Mr. Robinson has requested that the Right-of-Way be
moved to the rear of the two lots.
Staff has reviewed this request and while it is noted that this Right-of-Way has not been used for a
number of years feel that a Right-of-Way in this area should be maintained in the event it is required for
emergency access to the force main and the pumping station. The Right-of-Way as proposed to be
relocated will be satisfactory for any future access needs.
A plan illustrating this location is attached.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 223
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B118
-- - - --- -
-1_--; i . ~;-'~:r"-'o$U'
". ., I. I I
I I! . I I . i
'T ,I' I' ,
· I' I I" .. f. I
1 I I ,. :1 I
I; I i I' I j ~.I
I . lli L' I i I .
I
, . . -t.- - -
"\ I
_._ .___' -~~li -
ii i !I.!..:' -'. - I . I
I...... _ __ I_ i I
.. II!. '--1 I I
ill ..- ,,". , L, 'I
- . ,
- II.
.- ; I
> ~ ~ \ I
,- ,~ II
CD -~ ~
~ , I - -. ..
. I \
I ~-
~ '-. -
.... S i' 1 ..
0 , , .
I : -
.... - I , ~
.J::. ~ . . !
, ,
C) . f ....... -=- .~ ' I
.-
a: . i
I .=-
~ .
Q)
Z i \ ,
~ "'C i
. .. QJ i KEY MAP
CI) %
I \ I
. CD I '" ~
I: ~ \ \ l \
:; I I
0: \ I I ~
" ~
~ ,
.
QJ ~ I
.c . \
0
.... \ I
> ;
ca ..
~ \ I
I
....
..... 0
c: I
Q) ....
E .J::.
, C)
OJ : c:: \
en .
.. \
co ,.. 'i
, C) \
w . . !
c: .
.... " .- ..
c: \ ....
, CI) ~~
OJ -.\ ......~ .- 1 ..
c: '. , X ,... , ,
CD ...' \" W .. I ...-
., . . I
E \\\ :1' .:. . w
.\ w ...
I :, -
~
OJ ....~ ... I .i :
a..
~... I
I '
'.
. I
..' ,.~.., ..- " .
.0 ". '. . .- ,
',. \ . " ~..~ I
.
_.__0, -. ..-
.. \' .... --. -.--
'\." to --- - - .
"-
.
B119 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
I , I.'::r, ,I ~c..h -e ct uk A"
I -- I
- I
I
,
II' . ... -- , ~
'f, I ........ , : ",.-
I ~
, . ..-
,
, -- -- - - -- -- -- -.-=:: --- - - --- ----~ '
---.. .
- -. - - : .::.'.... fl?
,.... . , .. II
.. . .
".. .... ..... . -- , :
1_____'
' n.
, .... .1", :I:fiJ
I ,
I I
1
'1' .... '... \
,
I I
.- ---, ) .~ '
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --.. I \
, , , , -
I I .----~ I
--
, , ---
, . ,
I ,
,.., u._,.., , I
I .... ... ......'
. I ....
, ....... .....~ I
I M' ,C. I......, "'" ~ ""
I '..""1 #... -. ---~ I
.. .,-
c........ ..'I...AL ..."'....
..". , .....
'F"'--- ,,~ , .
.... ..... , _... '" L
. r , ..-'" .--.,..,..i........ I -
I I ~ , .......
IL . I .. ..' , '-...........
I .. . I
. .'1* ._1 i---..~~
-... "..
'I"
'0_
I ,.... , .,' L:::: ---'
. " " ,."~ . .
-- . , -----.~
'-.-- ....M. ,
. J I .....1.-
.......
, --'
I , ,
- . , , ---\f' ,.-' ,
~ '-
I
- ,./ _.-- ..-
_wo . ,..---
,~_.---' "'..",,'
--- ---'
If"~l' ~ A. . II. C
~'L 1 / 1 I
Ir
. I
.-
I
LOCATION MAP : . . i: '.
..
,
BY - LAW NO.239- 95 I II "I; , . .. .
L o.
,.". 1:'. . .. . .
FILE NO. Z.36.93
~ SUBJECT LANOS LOCATION' p^nT 01' LOT I. COflCESSION 5
~ SCI\LE : n 200m
. I
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B120
RES #E45/96- SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND
Receipt of offer from 1177284 Ontario Limited for the purchase of surplus
Authority land situate at the north east corner of Jane Street and Steeles Avenue,
in the City of Vaughan, in the Regional Municipality of York.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report dated May 1, 1996 regarding an
offer from 1177284 Ontario Umited for the purchase of surplus Authority land situated at the north
east corner of Jane Street and Steeles Avenue, in the City of Vaughan, in the Regional Municipality of
York be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to review the offer in more detail and bring a further report
forward to the Authority at meeting #4/96 scheduled for May 31, 1996 recommending any further
action to be taken. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following is a summary of the relevant details of the offer from 1177284 Ontario Limited:
(1 ) The sale price is to be the sum of $1,474,900.00;
(2) The Authority is to pay on closing $200,000.00 from the purchase price on account of lot
levies, development charges, school board charges and roadway and service improvements
(the purchaser has indicated that this figure is based on this charge being $400,000 or more);
(3) The property is to be developed for use as a cemetery and crematorium;
(4) The purchaser agrees to assume the Authority conditions, with the exception of the rezoning
of the property as set out in item (6) below, as earlier set out by the members of the
Authority:
a) The Proponent shall be required, at its expense, to obtain site plan approval,
building permits including authorizations required from all municipal, regional and
other government bodies having jurisdiction to permit the construction of burial
plots, mausoleums, columbariums, crematorium chapel and cemetery;
b) No building shall exceed six stories in height;
c) No gasoline filling stations or obnoxious industrial or commercial uses shall be
permitted;
B121 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
d) The development concept and details must be compatible with surrounding
Authority resources, specifically Black Creek Pioneer Village;
e) The development approval shall include a mitigation plan for vegetation
preservation which is acceptable to the Authority;
f) The proponent shall control the quantity and quality of the storm water emanating
from the site in a manner acceptable to the Authority;
(5) The closing of the sale shall be on or before December 30, 1996;
(6) The deposit payable to the Authority is to be the sum of $73,745.00 and the assumption by
the Authority of the costs associated with the application to the City of Vaughan for zoning
by-law amendments and official plan amendments (which application shall be made by the
Authority who shall have carriage of the application). If the transaction is not completed the
costs for this application save and except the costs of Authority staff time associated with
the application, shall be deducted from the deposit to a maximum of $25,000:
(7) Completion of the sale is to be subject to the purchaser obtaining approval to construct a
cemetery and crematorium on or before the closing date from all relevant approval
authorities;
(8) The purchaser has the right to purchase additional Authority land on the west side of Jane
Street, north of Steeles Avenue at market value if it is declared surplus by the Authority at
some future date;
(9) No real estate commission is payable on this transaction by the Authority.
A copy of the Agreement of Purchase and Sale is attached.
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #6/91, held on September 6, 1991 the Authority declared the subject parcel as
surplus to its requirements.
On February 9, 1993, the Authority entered into an agreement with 970545 Ontario Limited
represented by Mr. Nick DiLorenzo for the sale of this parcel of land to be used for a senior citizens
residence and community and cultural centre. Completion of the transaction was conditional upon re-
zoning, removal of the land from the Parkway Belt Designation and the issuance of an Order in Council.
A hearing before the Joint Board under the provisions of the Consolidated Hearings Act of Ontario was
held in July, 1994 to deal with matters under the jurisdiction of the Ontario Municipal Board pertaining
to the Planning Act and other issues pursuant to the Parkway Belt Planning and Development Act.
A favourable decision was received in September of 1994 from the Joint Board. United Parcel Service
then filed a Petition to Cabinet seeking to revoke the Joint Board's decision. In January of 1995, the
Provincial Cabinet confirmed the decision of the Joint Board.
The Order in Council authorizing completion of this sale by the Authority was received in January
1995.
970545 Ontario Limited and their associates were unsuccessful in obtaining seniors housing unit
allocation and funding assistance from the provincial government to proceed with the proposed senior
citizens housing development as originally planned.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B122
At Meeting #8/95 held on September 22, 1995 the members of the Authority set out the terms under
which an extension would be granted to 970545 Ontario Limited, however 970545 Ontario Limited did
not comply with the terms of the extension and the agreement was terminated.
Since that time Authority staff has continued to market the property including an advertisement in the
Toronto Star and distributing information on the availability of the parcel with the distribution of the
tender package for the land at Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road in the City of Vaughan.
The zoning currently in place on this property is site specific for the 150 residential units and
commercial uses in the precise form proposed by 970545 Ontario Limited. To facilitate the cemetery
and crematorium use or any development other than an exact replica of the development proposed by
the previous prospective purchaser, amendments to the zoning by-law and official plan forthis property
will be required. United Parcel Service will object to any residential use of the property, however they
have indicated on a preliminary basis that they would not object to this use.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
There is an immediate need to proceed with the sale of this property to meet current acquisition
commitments which are as follows:
(A) Milne Hollow (Markovic) -Located in the vicinity of Lawrence Avenue and the Don
Valley Parkway, City of North York Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
(B) Humber Trail Links -Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
(C) Centennial Creek - City Of Scarborough, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
(D) Moore Property- Located on the west spit of Frenchman's Bay, Town of
Pickering
(E) Allan Property- Located On the south side of King Road, Town of Caledon
(F) Broda Drive - City of Vaughan
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 223
.
. I
-
B123 May 10,1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
"
r-OR USE IN TIlE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO
AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE
PURCHASER. 1177284 ONTARIO UMITED. offers 10 huy irom VENDOR. The Melropolilan
Toronlo and Region Conservalion Authoruy. Ihrough no agenl. the fOllowmg PROPERTY: North casl
comer Jane Slreel and Sleeles Avenue. hcing pans of LOI I. Concession 5 and lhose pans of the road
allowance designated as Pans I. 2. 3. 4. II and 14 on Reference Plan 65R.9104 and comaining 4.3
acres more or less and as shown cross halched on the allached Schedule" A. at the PURCIIASE PRICE
of:
ONE MIWON FOUR HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FOUR THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED
DOlLARS (S1.474.900.00l10gelher wilh any applicable Goods and Services Tax. [f the area of Ihe
Propeny as determined by Ihe Vendor's surveyor is more or less than 4.3 acres. lhe Purchase Price
shall be inc:reased or decreased. as the case may be. attht: ratt: of S343.ooo.00 per acre. calculaled 10
three decimal places.
I. PURCHASER submits wilh this Offer St:venly Three Thousand Seven Hundred and Fony-Five
Canadian Dollars ($73.745.00). be 109 5% of the Purchase Price payable by cenified cheque 10
lhe Vendor as a deposll to he ht:ld hy II pending complellon or olher terminalion of thiS
Agreemenl and 10 be crediled un account of tht: Purchase Price on completion; and
2. PURCHASER agrees to pay lhe balance of Ihe Purchase Price hy cash ur cenified cheque on
closing 10 lhe Vendor. subjecI to lht: usual adjuslments.
3. (a) This Agreemem is subject 10 Ihe following condilions. which are al [he ellpense of lht:
Vendor and for Ihe henefil uf the Vt:ndor being salisfied in respccllu condilions ti) and
(ii) and for Ihe benefit of Ihe Purchaser being salisfied 10 respecl to condilion (iii):
(i) this Agreement being approved by the Executive Commillee and Members of Ihe
Vendor on or before June 30. [996.
(ii) the Vendor obtaining approval of Ihe Minister of Natural Resources pennilling
it to sell the Propeny on ur before October 30. 1996.
(iii) obtaining all necessary approvals. Ihrough Weslon L.ukin [nc.. Planners. umJer
the Planning Act nOI reslricled 10 Zonmg By-Law amendments and Official Plan
Amendments for use of the Propeny. in accordance with Purchaser's site plan.
as a crematorium and cemelery containing burial pIOlS. mausoleums.
columbariums and a chapel on or beiore :-Iovember 30. 1996. [n lhe event Ihal
lhis lransaclion does nOl close. lhe Vendor shall deduct from Ihe dep'osll the
planning and legal COSlS Incurred by lhe Vendor in processing the app/ic:lllOn nOI
to exceed S25.OOO.00.
If condition (iii) is not satisfied by November 30. 1996. the Vendor shall extend Ihe time for
satisfying the condition to June 30. 1997. provided the Purchaser consents in writing 10 such
extension. If the Purchaser does nOI consent 10 such eXlension in writing lhe deposit wilhe .1
interest or deduction shall be returned 10 the Purchaser and each of lhe Panies shall be released
from their obligations herein.
If the Purchaser shall consent 10 such t:xlension in writing. then. during the period of eXlension
the Velll:lor shall have the right to a non refundable paymenl of $3.000.00 per month from lhe
deposit which shall be applied on account of the Purchase Price on closing if the. Ir:lnsaction
closes. If condilion (iii) is nOI salisfied by June 30. 1997 then the deposit less [he non
refundablt: payments wilhoul interest or lunher deduclion shall be returned to Ihe Purchaser aml
each of lhe panies shall be released from all lheir oblig31ions.
In Ihe event Ihal the Zoning By-Law or Official Plan Amendment shall be appealed 10 Ihe
Ontario Municipal Buard. Ihen lhe Purchascr shall havt: the right 10 lenninale Ihis Agreement
and the Vendor shall fonhwilh refund Ihe deposit momes less [he non-refundable payments paid
to Ihe Purchaser withoul interesl or funher deduclion.
- i
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B124
(b) The VenUor shall credit the Purch:lser on closmg :In allowance on account uf [he
Purchase Price of Two Humlreu Thous:lnu Dllllars IS2oo.000.oo) representing paymelll
10 the Purchaser un account of lot leVIes. uevelopment charges. school boarll charges anu
roadway alll.l servIce improvements Ihat are 10 he palu or will have 10 he palu by Ihe
Purchaser for lhe Purchaser's ucvelopment. The Purchaser shall have no financial
responsibility ur otherwIse fllr any COSIS or charges relating 10 ,my previous plannlllg
application for Ihe propeny.
(c) The Purchaser sh:lll unuert:lke on closing anu it shall be a condition of closing ior the
Vendor's benefit that the Purchaser has untJenaken as follows:
(i) The Purchaser shall be required. :It its expense, to obtain site plan approv:ll.
building permits incluuing authoriz:uions required from all municipal, regional
anu Olher government bodies having jurisuiction to permit the cnnslruction uf
burial plots. mausoleums, cOlumbanums, crematorium chapel anu cemetery.
(ii) No building height shall exceeu six storeys:
(iii) No gasoline filling stations or obnOXIOUS inuustrial or commercial uses shall he
pcrmiucu. ThiS restriction shall not apply 10 cemetery or crematorium uses.
(ivl The development concept amI Jetalls must be compalible with surrounding
AUlhority resources, specific:llly Dlack Creek Pioneer Village.
. (v) The uevelopment approval shall IOcluue a mitigation plan for vegetation
preserv:ltion which is acceptable to lhe AUlhority.
(vi) The Purchaser shall control the quantity anu qU:llity of the storm water eman:lling
from lhe sile in a manner acceptable 10 the AUthority.
(d) This Agreement of Purchase anu Sale is conditional unlil August 31, 1996. upon Ihe
Purchaser. at the Purchaser's expense, in its sole uiscretion being satisfied as 10 the
following mailers. failing which lhis Agreement uf Purchase and Sale shall be null anu
void. anu all ueposit monies shall be fonhwilh returneu to lhe Purchaser without inlerest
or deduction as aforesaid and each of lhe parties shall be rele:lsed from lheir obligallons
herein:
(i) that the Purchaser shall have obtained a Phase [ Environmental Report satisfactory
to the Purchaser;
(ii) that lhe Purchaser shall have oblamed the final approvals for the Purchaser's
development as a cemetery with burial lOIS, mausoleums and colunlbariums.
crematorium and chapel from: (i) Ihe City of Vaughan, (ii) Medical Officer of
Health under the Cemeleries ACl under lhe Minislry of Consumer and
Commercial Relatiuns. (iii) Minislry of Health (soil, water, tables. grading), (iv)
Ministry of lhe Environment (grading, Slorm water managemenl. crem:llorium),
(v) Ministry of Transponation (access) anu (vi) Region of York (access);
(iii) thaI the Purchaser shall have oblained a sile plan approval for lhl: development
of a cremalorium and cemelery containing burial plots. mausoleums.
columbariums amI a chapel.
The Vendor and lhe Purch:lser herelo acknowledge and confirm thaI lhe aforesaid
condilions conlaineu in lhe: preceding paragraph are incluued for lhe sole benefit <If [he
Purchaser and any or all of lhe aforesaid conuilions may be unilater:llly waived by lhe
Purchaser at any lime prior 10 the lime herein limiled. by nOlice in wriling 10 lhe
Vendor. In lhe event thaI any ur all uf lhe afuresaid condilions have nOI been satisfied
or waived by lhe Purchaser by such lime. lhen Ihis Agreemenl shall be null and voiu and
of nu funher force anu effecl and the Venuor shall fonhwilh refund all deposil monies
10 lhe Purchaser withoul interesl or deduClion aforesaid and e:lch of lhe panies shall be
released frum lheir oblig:ltiuns herein.
:;,. i
I
B125 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
(e) TIlis Agrecmem of Purchase anu Sale is l:UlIllilinnill (or a peno<l 01 Ihiny nO) <lays (rom
acceplance upon Ihe: Purchaser, at Ihe Pun:h3SCr ; expense, 10 its sole uiscrellon bemg
sallslic:U that the Purchaser shall have lIbtallleu lavour:lble prelimlOary inuicallons lrolll
the: Regislr:lr un<le:r the Cemeteries :leI for lhe establishment of a crem:1l0flum ,IIlU
cemetery. failing which their Agreemenllll Purcnase and Sale shall be null anu vOI<l anu
all <leposll mome:s shall he ronhwllh relUmeu 10 Ihe Purchaser wilhout Interest llr
ueuuclion except lor costs incurreu in par:lgr:lph )(al(iii) anu each of Ihe: panles shall he
rele:asetl irom Ihelr obligations.
(I) Upon acceptance hereof. Ihe VenUor agrees 10 allow Ihe Purchaser's engineers. surveyors
anu consullants 10 enler upon Ihe Propeny for Ihe purposes of conuucling soil leSlS anu
such OIher lests anu examinations as may be preliminary to the purchaser's uevelopmcnl
of Ihe Propeny. provided thaI the real propeny shall be reslored by the Purchaser al ils
sole expense 10 Ihe phYSical conuilion exisllng pnor 10 such tests anu examlllallons be:mg
made.
(g) The Purchaser shall use its best c:ffons 10 assist the Vendor in its rezoning and ot'licial
plan amenument applications. The Vendor shall use its best effons 10 assISt Ihe
Purchaser 10 its sile plan approval anu shall cxecule any applic:lIIons or authoriz:llIons
4.. The Purchaser and Vendor acknowledge lhat lhe adjacenl parcel 10 the easl of Ihe Propeny IS
, owned by the CilY of Vaughan anu is presemly uscu as a slonn waler detention pond oUllineu
in purple 10 Schedule "A" auached ("Vaughan Lands") In Ihe evenl thaI the Vcndor shall
. pennitthe water on the Vaughan Lands 10 urain 1010 the Vendor's slonn w:ller detention pond
on the soulh siue of Stee:les Avenue ("Mill Ponu"). Ihen the Venuor will grant to Ihe Purchascr
a first opponunllY to panu.:ipalc in the financial cOnlflbullon 10 ur:lin Ihe Vaughan Lanus anu ;1
first opponunity to aC4uire Ihe Vaughan Lanus if the Venuor shall acquire the Vaughan Lanus.
5. The Vendor owns propeny fronting on lane Slreet :'Ilonh of Sleeles Avenue oUllined in green
on Schedule "A" (herein "Jane Slreet Lanus") anu the Venuor shall on Closing Date gr:lnt to Ihc
Purchaser lhe following right of fim opponunity 10 acquire lhe "Jane Slreet Lands";
(a) If the Vendor desires to sell the Jane Slreet Lands or any pan thereof. the Vendor shall
provide nOlice (the "Vendor's Notice") to the Purchaser of such proposed sale. The
Vendor's Notice shall state Ihatlhe Vendor uesires to sell the Jane Street Lands or J parI
thereof, and shall set outlhe temlS and conditions upon which and the price at which Ihe
Venuor desires 10 sell the lane Slreet Lanus or a pan thereof.
(b) Upon the Vendors Notice being given. the Purchaser shall have the right t'" :mer into a
binding non-assignahle agrecmenl to purchase Ihe Jane Slreet Lands upon In:: t,erms and
conditions and at the price set out in the Vendor's Notice, by notifying the Vendor III
writing of its acceptance: thereOf (the "Acceplance NOlice") within sixty (60) days of
receipt of the Vendor's Notice. lhe Vendor shall be entitlc:tlto sell the Jane Slreet Lands
to any person withlr. ;1Oe hundreu and eighlY (180) days after the dale that Ihe Vendor's
NOlice was provide_ 0 the Purchaser on lenns and at a price no less favour:lble in the
aggregate to the \/I.:nuor quanlified from a monetary stanupoinlthan those: set fonh in Ihe
Vendor's Notice.
(c) This right of first opponunity shall not apply to the sale by the Vendor of the Jane Slree:l
Lands to any person. corpllr:ltion. trust or legal entity that is in any way affilialed with,
controlled by, or not at arm's-Iength with the Vendor
(d) This right of first opponunity shall be immedialely and automatically temlinated upon
Ihe earlier of:
(i) the sale of the lane Street Lands or any part thereof by the Vendor in accordance
with the terms hereof save and except for a sale to any person, corporalion, trust
or legal entity thaI IS in any way affilialed with. cOnlrolled hy, OJ' not at arm's-
lenglh with the Vendor, and;
- .
r
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10,1996 B126
"
(ii) the Jefault hy the Purch:lscr in the cOInplellon of the purchase of Ihe Jane Street
Lands or any part thereol fullowing the Purchaser's exercise ollhe right llt iim
opponunity set nut herem.
(e) This right of first opponunity shall apply to the sale of any part of the Jane Street Lands
whether ur not it IS to be sold as part of a transaction invnlving other assets and in such
lriIse the Vendor's Notice shall indude an allocation of Ihe purchase price so as to allow
the right of firstopportunuy to be: cxerciseU wuh ~Spettto Ihe imerest in the Jane Street
Lands to be sold. Any such allocation shall be supported by an opmion letter of an
independelll appraiser which shall be provided by lhe Vendor to Ihe Purchaser with the
Vendor's Notice.
6. PURCHASER covenants and agrees to anti with the Vemlor that in the event the Purchaser shall
sell the Property without improvements 10 a non-arms length purchaser for another use other
than a cemetery/crematorium use within five years of closing, then lhe Purchaser shall pay 10
the Vendor 50% 01 the increase in pun:haSe price over $1.474.900.00 less real CStale
commission ami other closing costs. The foregoing .lacs not apply to a sale or transler for
cemetery/crematorium and related uses.
7. PURCHASER agrees that Ihis Offer shall be irrevocable by him until \:00 p.m. on June 4.
1996, after which lime, if not accepted. Ihis Offer shall he null anJ void and Ihe Jeposit shall
be returned to the Purchaser without interest or .leducllon.
8. TillS Agreement, suhjectlo paragraph 3. shall he completed 30 days after waiving or satisfYll1g
of all the conditioos setuut io par.Jgraph 3 hereol (.Closmg Date"). Upon complellon. vacant
possession of the Property shall be given to Ihe Purchaser,
9. PURCHASER shall he allowed until 5:00 p.m. on the \5th day of September, 1996 (Requisition
Date) to examine title to the Property. at his own expense.
\0. VENDOR and Purchaser agree that there is no condition. express or implied. representation.
warranty of any kind thatlhe future intended use of Ihe Property by the Purchaser is or will be
lawful other than as set OUt in this Agreement.
\1. PURCHASER shall not call for the production of any ritle deed. abstract, surveyor other
evidence of title to the Property except such as a~ in the possession or control of the Vendor.
The Vendor agrees that he will Jeliver any sketch or survey of the Property or any reportS or
studies of the Property in his possession or within his comrol 10 the Purchaser as soon as
possible after acceplance and in any event within Ihirty (30) days of acceptance.
\2. PROVIDED that the title to Ihe Property is good and f~e from all ~gistered restrictions.
charges. liens and encumbrances except as llIherwise specifically provided in this Agreement and
save and except for: (a) any registered restrictions or covenants that run with the lands,
providing that such are complied with: (b) any registered municipal agreements and registered
agreements wilh publicly regulated utilities providing such have been complied with. or security
has been posted 10 ensure compliance and completioo, as evidenced by a letter from the relevant
municipality or regulated utility: (c) any minor casements for the supply of domestic utility or
telephone services to the property or adjacent properties: and (d) any casements for .lrainagc.
storm or sanitary sewers. public utility lines, telephone lines. cable television lines or uthcr
services; provided Ihat all of the foregoing exceplions do not materially affect the use of the
Property as a cemetery or a crematorium. If within the specified times ~ferred to in paragraph
7 any valid objection to title or 10 any oUlstanding municipal work order or deficiency nOlice is
made in writing to lhe Vendor and which the Vendor is unable or unwilling to remove, remedy
or satisfy and which lhe Purchaser will not waive. lhis Agreement notwithstanding any
intermedi:lle acts or negotiations in respectuf such objections. shall be at an end and all monies
therelofore paid shall be returned wilh interest and withuut .leduclion and the Vendor shall Illll
be liable for any costs ur damages. Save as to any valid ubjection so made by such day and
except for any objection going to the root of title, the Purchaser shall be conclu~ively deemed
to have accepted the Vendor's title 10 the Property.
-,
. !
I
B127 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
13. PURCHASF.R shall have che righl to assign chis Agreemenl of Purchase and Sale al any time
on or befll'. 'Iosing Dale to any person. company or corporallon ami upon such aSSignment all
liability, it .y, of the Purchaser shall .:ease and tcrminace aoothe Vc:nlior shall look only 10
such assignee: for complelion of this agreement.
14. VENDOR represents that it shall not be a non-residcm of Canada within the meaning of 171t!
lncomt! TlU Act on lhe Closing Date.
IS. ANY realty taxes. local improvemem charges shall be appunioned and alloweli to the liay of
complelion (the day itself to be apponioned to the Purchaser).
16. THE Transfer/Deed shall. save for the Land Transfer Tax Affidavits. be prepared in registrable
form at the expense of lhe Vendor. The; Tnnsfer/DeeU to be delivered on complction shall
contain the stalements contemplated by clause 50(22) of 171t! Planning Act, 1990.
17. TIME shall in all respeclS be of the essence hereof provided thaI rhe lime for doing or
completing of any mailer provided for herein may be extended or abridged by an agreement in
wriling signed hy the Vendor anli the Purchaser or by their respecllve solicitors who arc
expressly appointed in this reganl.
18. IT IS AGREED THAT the panies shall execule anli file any documents required. including.
but not limited to. the Form 60, If neccssary, anli any other appliCJble iorm to Insure lhatthe
a.S.T. is not collectible by the Vendor on Ihis transaction. The Purchaser covenants and
warrants to lhe Vendor that it shall. prior 10 closing. provide rhe Vendor wilh:
(a) its a.S.T. registntion numbcr;
(b) evidence that it has made its election for purposes of a.s. T. such that the a.s. T is not
collectible by lhe Vendor on closing;
(c) undenakes 10 file any necessary elections or documents in order [0 fulfilrhe intent of this
clause. which warranty shall survive the closing of this lransaction.
19. THIS Agreement including any schedules allached hcreto shall constitute the emire agreement
between the Purchaser and the Vendor_ TIlerc is no represemation, warr:mty, collateral
agreement or condition. whether dircct or collateral, or express or implied. which induced any
pany hereto to enter into this Agreement or on which reliance is placed by such pany, or which
affects this Agreement or the Propeny or supponed hereby olher than as expressed herein. ThiS
Agreement shall be read with all changes of gender or number required by the .:onte'!-l. In lhc
event of conflict between any proviSIOn in lhe primed ponion hereof rhe wrillen or typed
provision shall supersede the printed provisions to (he eXlem of such contlic!. .
DATED at Vaughan. this 29th day or April, 1996
SIGNED. SEALED & DELIVERED ) IN WITNESS whereor I have hereunto set in the
presence of: ) my hand and seal:
)
) l1~'''ITED
)
) Per: W
) -
) EreOrge C. Damiani. President
)
) I have authority 10 bind the CorplJration.
~ !
I
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B128
THE UNDERSIGNED ac:apcs the above Offer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Vendor has hereunto executed this Agreement.
) THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND
) REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
) Per:
(Date) )
)
)
) Per:
)
)
)
) We have authority to bind the COl1lOratioll.
c'.,.sIl......';OO'-'oII'
---
> I
,
B129 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
ACKNOWLEOOEMENT
I/We acknowledge receipt of a signed copy or UWe AI:luIDwlcdle reccipl ot a sigDCU copy or
this Agrcemclll of Pun:_ and Sale this ApccmcDl of Pun:huc and SaJc
The MeuopoliWl ToronlO and Dale 1177284 OIlWlCl Lillllled Dale
RegIon Consc"alion Authorny clo George C. DamiaDi
5 5hordwn Drive 65 Piac Valley CrCSCCIII
Downsview, Onwio WOOIIbrioJge. OnwIO
M3N 154 lAL 2W3
Tel No.: (416) 661-6600 Tel No.: (90S) 851.3688
Fax No.: (416) 661-6898 Fu No.: (905) 8.51-4.578
SolicilOn ror tile Vendor _ So!icilOn ror 1Ilc Pun:lwcr
Ambony Furgiuelc
Pamer '" Boccia
Address: Suile 212.
4000 5lccles Avenue WCSI
WOOIIbridse, OI\W'IO
lAL 4V9
Tel No.. Tel No.: (90S) SSo.80IO
Fax No.: Fu No.: (905) 8S0.8086
-'-
- !
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B130
-' " .'
f ' f.? -- ,
- ,
'. f
,
"' . .,. -- , ..
'I. I ........ , : ",~
I:
/. ~
,
-- -- -- -- ------ -- ------------~ '
r -__
-. -_ I .
--. -,: .:::.... tj
..... . I ;- ,\
._ ,__ 4
..... .... ..... , , ..
lu_u i
' ... w;/JiJ
,........, .
I .,
I I
I
to I .... '... , \
I I
-- ---., I .~.,
1__ _ - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- -- - ---... I \
. , -, , .~
, , .,..--.{ I
-- -~
/ ,
I . .
I ,
.t.. .... '"' I I
I 11'- .It .......
I ....
I ....... .....::::::::::. I
I ... 'C. .......,......... . ---J...
,.," ".. .. . -- ---..... .
I II ~. I
- ..-
C........ ..,'..'L .'U.." .
-=- . .....
'F..~--- . ,.'- .
II'. ..... I -....... .0. L.
. iL~..---..... ...... ...... ( .~ .-
, I I., , , .......
I I ...... ,~_...""
, . ,--.. , ; , ..,"" ..- ."'...
.. ..'_ .:. ;.-.J
__ . .. .0" J J -.-/ c~
T' , ~ .
, ,".. . .
f ','" , , --."'"'\
. , .L___o 0
. ' , r-
-- t .__,-"
\ '. .
...--- .......
, ./ ,--
u..... ~.
, ...--'
I , ,
- . .....--'\ ....-...
. .." t'....
, -
,... r/ .___ ...
. ,---
,..- ,~_.,--_.- "',....",'
--- --.... -
""Ll' , ....Nul
~'L j / 1 I
. Ir
. I
.--
I
LOCATION MAP ; . .(. '..
O'
,
BY - LAW NO.2~9- 95 I . .
\ II :~!: I ..... '00 .
I: " . ..-
..~ ....
FILE NO. Z.36.93
~ SUBJECT LANDS LOCATION' p^nT OF LOT I, COIICESSION 5
~ SCI\LE : n 200m
I I
B131 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RES #E46/96- DISPOSAL/LEASE OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS
Sale or lease of surplus Authority owned land situated on the east side of IslinQton
Avenue south of Rutherford Road in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of
York.
Moved by: Michael Oi Biase
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report dated April 19,1996, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT a report be submitted to the Authority at its meeting on May 31. 1996. with
respect to the offers received on the sale or lease of Authority land on the east side of Islington
Avenue south of Rutherford Road in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York. through the
public tender process. ................................................... CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting 2/96, the Members adopted Resolution #A21/96 which was amended by
Resolution #A23/96 and read as follows:
THA T staff prepare a review of the Authority's overall financial situation and the role
that sale or lease of land deemed surplus to Greenspace requirements might play during
1996 and future years in funding both land purchases and ongoing operating costs;
and;
THA T staff report to the Authority at the earliest possible date with a proposed
strategy.
THA T the consideration of whether any of the lands included in the tableland parcel
situate on the east side of Islington A venue, north of Rutherford Road identified as
Parcel "A ~ being Part of Lots 16, 17 and 18, Concession 7, in the City of Vaughan,
containing approximately 75 acres, can be declared surplus, hp- dp-fp-rrp-d pending the
results of the overall review.
THA T the parcel of Authority owned table land on the east side of Islington Avenue,
south of Rutherford Road, identified as Parcel "B ~ being part of Lot 15, Concession 7,
in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, containing approximately 10 to
15 acres of vacant table land hp- tfp-d;,rp-tf ~urplw: to the future requirements of the
Authority subject to:
(a) all existing Municipal requirements for future use of this part of
Lot 15, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, being met.
(b) The proposed use is to be of a nature compatible with the
Authority's objectives and to not negatively affect the Authority's
adjacent holdings.
(c) A vegetated buffer of not less than 10 metres is to be established
to the satisfaction of the Authority on lands to be retained by the
Authority.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B132
(d) Storm water management practices are to be carried out on the
site to the satisfaction of the Authority.
(e) Fencing along the new property boundary is to be carried out to
the satisfaction of the Authority at no cost to the Authority.
(f) An archaeological investigation is to be conducted before any site
disturbance with any mitigative measures required being carried
out at no cost to the Authority.
THA T the availability of Parcel "8" be advertised publicly for sale or lease to obtain the
maximum possible potential financial return for the property and in no event less than
the current market value or in conflict with Authority objectives.
AND FURTHER THA T the parcel of tableland situate on the east side of Islington
Avenue at the entrance to Boyd Conservation Area identified as Parcel "C~ being Part
of Lots 12 and 13, Concession 7, in the City of Vaughan, containing approximately 1 0
acres of tableland, nnt h~ r.nm:id~r~d ~1I(plm:
The availability of the surplus Authority owned land at this location was advertised publicly for sale or
lease in the Toronto Star on April 10 and 24, 1996 and the Globe & Mail on April 10, 1996, and a sign
was placed on the property. All parties who expressed an interest in the land during the public
consultation process, were also advised of the availability of the lands.
Sealed offers for the sale or lease of the property are to be submitted to the attention of the Chief
Administrative Officer of the Authority before 4:00 p.m., May 9, 1996. Copy of the information
provided to prospective purchasers is attached.
Proposals received will be opened at a Tender Opening Committee Meeting to be held immediately
before the Executive Committee on May 10. To expedite the process, it is recommended that a report
on the results of the proposal will be brought to the Authority meeting on May 31 as opposed to the
next Executive Meeting which will be held in June. In the event that there is a proposal which staff is
prepared to recommend, the Authority will be able to consider it on May 31. If no acceptable
proposals are received, then the Authority can give staff appropriate direction.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the funds generated from the sale or lease of this surplus land be utilized to assist in
funding high priority Authority activities.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 223
B133 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
TENDER OPENING SUB-COMMITTEE - REPORT #10/96
May 10, 1996
1000 Murray Ross Parkway, Downsview, Ontario.
The Tender Opening Sub-Committee met on Friday May 10,1996 at 8:45 a.m. to open tenders for the
Sale or Lease of Authority land in the vicinity of Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road.
PRF~FNT Member:
Brian Harrison
Staff:
Director, Finance and Administration
Jim Dillane
Chief Administrative Officer Craig Mather
Manager, Property and Adminstrative
ServicesDon Prince
Property AgentMike Fenning
Administrative AssistantPaula Leggieri
The tenders for the Sale or Lease of Authority land in the vicinity of Islington A venue and Rutherford
Road are as follows:
Cnmp;lny TAndAr Pllrr.h;l!,:p' Prir.p.
Fieldgate Development and $1,125,000
Construction Limited - In Trust Certified Cheque - $56,250
Sam Frustaglio - In Trust $2,100,000
Certified Cheque - $105,000
Little Hampton Holding Corp. $826,500
Certified Cheque - $41,325
Mr, and Mrs. William R. Fach $138,000
Certified Cheque - $6,900
Father Claudio Moser - In Trust $1,125,000
Certified Cheque - $56,250
Rili Construction Weston Limited $1,050,000
Certified Cheque - $52,500
IT WAS AGREED AND RECOMMENDED THAT the tenders received as listed above be referred to staff
for review and report.
Ipl.
~~
~ r
I B134
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996
~
, 1I1e metropolitan torontc and region conservation authority
5 shontham drtve. downsvtew. ontano. man 154 (416) 681~ FAX 661~8
FOR SALE OR LEASE
AUTHORITY OWNED LAND
CITY OF VAUGHAN
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
APRIL 1996
Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
, I
r
B135 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
AREA DESCR.IPTTON
The subJet:: property IS loc:lted in me ~ cemni pornon of:he City of Vaughan. wlthm the R~glOnai
Muruc.paiit'j of Y orle.
The Region of York compnses 3even towns. one city md one township The Region is sItuated
immediately nonh of the y!erropoliun Toronto Boundary at Steeles ..~venue :md extends northerly
to Lake Simcoe. Provinc.a! Hiszhwav :'-io. 50 bounds the Re2ion on the west and the YorkiDurham
- . -
line encloses the Region to the east.
The Ctv of Vau~an is loc:lted In :he southwest Jornon or j:e Remon. and llthough :he Town oJf
. - . - -
Marknam IS mil the most populated ~e:l '.vithm the RegIOn. Vaugnan IS expenenc:ng :reme:1COUS
growth. In [973. Vaughan hac the :aurth ~argest iJopuianon berund :Ylarknam. Rlchrnonc ruil mc
Newmance: By 1991. Vaughan had :iU~assed ~ewmarke: me :y 1993 oecame more pc;=uious than
Rlchmond Hill Vlughan'5 c~r.-e:':t populatlon mmcs lt lpcrOXlmate:y 1:0.')00 me :ne .::r:: :s
conslcerec :0 be the :astest growmg :nuruc:paiity wltrun :ne Re~on Jr York
~ithm :he Cry or Vaughan there ~e :cur major lreas wiuc:: :nc:ude Woodbndge. Thor:'Juil. :Yfapie
and :he :ur:u lreas (induding ICe:ncurg, ~ashvlile. e:c.) These tour areas contain 1 :ruxtUre JI
devclopme:u jensmes Wlth W oodbr.age. Tnomiuil JIld :yraple ,emg composed of = 50 :OOt. sUlgie
farruiy re5lce:mai lot subdivisIons. whiie Vaughan's norther:y commurunes such .lS !Cemburg contam
mostly ~ate resloennai subdivISIons of = : ac:-e lots
The major highways throughout :he Cr:/ of Vaughan inc:uc:ie Hignway:--io ~oo. which :raverses the
city in a north-south direc:lOn in the .:entre or :he muruc:paliry. md High\'.a::--io i, which ~:c:ends
across the southerly portion of the :nuruc:paiiry Ul m ~-West dire=lon. Proposed Highway::-io ~07
will be llinuted ac:ess. multi-lane :ughway and IS iJroposed to be construc:ed wlthm the next 10
years Its [oanon "",ill be in the southern portion Jfthe munic:pality Just south of ~xisting Highway
No - y(aJor artenal roads throughout the ar~ cross the municIpality in a grid system. with
I Rutherford Road bemg a major east-west roadway throughout the CIty Islington Avenue is 1
secondary arterial road located in the south ~terly portlon or the muruclpalicy
Neighbourhood
In the area of the subJec property. Rutherford Road is the boundary for municipal water and sanitary
sewer servicJ1g. Lands to the south ofRuther:ord Road have serviClng available for intensive urban
development, while lands nonh of Rutherford Road do not have xc:ss to munic:pal water or sanitary
sewers As l result, development is oc:urring on the south side ofRuth~rford Road. while none IS
occurring on the north side of Rutherford Road.
The land uses within the immediate area of the subJet:: property include
',,-
. J
, B136
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996
- 2 -
To the South . MTRCA lands which form part of the Boyd Dam and ReservoIr. Humber
River valley and the Boyd Conservation Area as well as single family
residennal subdivtslons which are part of the Woodbndge Community
To the East Immediately east is the valley of the Humber River, which lands are under the
ownership of the MTRCA and form part of the Boyd Dam and Reservoir,
with lands further to the east. east of Pine Valley Drive. proposed for
development with single family residential subdivisIons.
To the ~orth The West Vaughan Communirv Centre is located immediatelv north of the
, ,
subjec: lands at the southeast comer of Rutherford Road and Islington
Avenue. Tne southwest comer of Rutherford Road and Islington .~venue is
currently improved with an older industrial building wluch IS the subJec: or J.
re-zoning JPpliCJ.tion to change tile zoning from industnal to commerClal uses.
Lands at :he northe:J.St :omer of Rut he nord Road and IsJingron .~venue Jre
proposed :or a high school
It IS antlc:pated that the development of land south or Ruthe::ord !toad ,.will :ommue while lands
no~..h or Rutherrord Road have more long term :ievelopmem ;Jote:mai. Deveiopmem iJotentialls
direc"'Jy related to the availability of muruc:pal se:-vicmg.
L~~ USE CONTROLS
Official Plan
The subjec: property is designated Open Space by Amendment ~o 240 to the Official Plan for the
City of Vaughan. This amendment is known as the Woodbridge Community Plan. It would appe:lI"
pOSSIble that this designation was given to the property as a result or its ownership by the );ITRCA..
The lands in question are above the Floodplain and Fill Regulations as defined by the );ITRCA
through Ontario Regulation ).;0. 158.
Zoning
The subject property is currently zoned 'A' - Agricultural by By-Law i'io 1-88 for the City of
Vaughan. The agricultural by-law designation permits agricultunl uses. which are typically farm
operations. a .single family derached dwelling. institutional uses, a church and other recreational uses.
- I
r May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
B137
- 3 -
SITE DESC1UPTION
The :YmCA. IS proposing to dispose of a pared ofland descnbed as Pm of Lot 15. ConcesSIon i,
City of Vaughan. RegIonal y[uruclpality of York, contauung approxunateiy 15 acres. SItuate on the
east sIde ofIsiington Avenue south of Rutherford Road.
GE:'fERAL TER.\tfS AND CONDmONS
All otters are subject to compliance by the :\uthority with the proVIsIons or the Planning .-\c:. R. S 0
1990 and me Conservation A.uthorines .-\C"'.. R.S.O 1990. JS amended. as set out in the form or utter;
Offers wiil be received untii -+ 00 ?m. loc:ti :une. Tnursday. :Yfay 9. 1996. at the ur::ce or The
Me::ropoliun Toronto and RegIen Conse:'":aoon Aumonty. 5 Shorenam Dme. Dov..i1s\.ie'N. Ontmo.
M.3~ lS~ .-\tte:mon :Yfr J C y{athe:-. Cruer' .-\dnurustnn...e oecer:
All otters m!ill be se:lled :n an e:weiepe and c!~y markec "RllHERFORD ROAD .-\..."'l"""O
ISLLNGTON .-\ VE:'iU"'E PROPERTY-
Proponents are responsible for investigating all munic:pal. regional and provincia! land use
reguiatlons. building, zomng and/or other regulations. The lands are sold "as is" without any
representations or warranties by the .-\uthority as to use or condinon:
The foilowing Authority conditions and requirements ~ be addressed in the Agreement of
Purchase and Safe or Offer to Le:lSe
(a) Trus Agreement is subjec:: to the following conditiOns. bemg satisfied on or prior to
the closing of tillS transaction:
(i) the Vendor obtaining approval of the Minister of Natural Resources
permitting it to sell the Property;
(ii) the .-\gI'eeme..,t b~.ng approved by the Executive Committee and y[embers of
the Vendor;
(iii) a consent being obtained pursuant to Section 50 of the Planning Act. 1990,
at Vendor's cost, without conditions anaching thereto or if any conditions are
aruc!led to the consent, they are satisfac:ory to Vendor
(bl Purchaser is solely responsible for any amounts required to be paid to any municipal
or other governmental JUthority including lot levies. development charges or building
permits or othe:'"Nise that may be required prior to any improvements or building
.~--
~ ~
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B138
.4.
being constrUC"'..ed on the Property :wi such amounts are not included in the Purchase
Price.
(c) The Vendor is to have the right to review :md approve all development plans to
ensure the proposed use is not contrary to Vendor's objectives and does not
negatively impac: the Vendors :uijacem holdings:
(d) The Purchaser is to conmuct. in accordance with the Vendors standards. a 6 foot
black vinyl chain link fence along the new property boundary at the Purchasers
expense;
(e) The purchaser is to est:lblish at Purchaser's cost. 3. 10 metre veget:lted buffer
satisfac:ory to the Vendor on the lands to be retained by the vendor to consist of:
(i) native varieties of plant material
(ii) a combination of sizes :md SDet:es :ue recuired :oilowinsz :hese zuideiines.
.. .. --
3 O~"a shrubs. 35% bareroot :md 35% .::1iiper trees
(iii) a ratio or 60% coniferous :md ~% dec:ciuous with respec: to the ~areroot
and Qiiper :rees
A planting plan is to be submitted to the vender :or a.pproval.
(f) the Purchaser shall comply with :ill ~[unicipal requirements for the future use of the
property:
(g) an archaeologic:1l investigation is to be conduc:ed :md :my mitigative ac:ion required
is to be c:uried out to the satisfuC"'jon of the "Ii endor prior to any site disturbance. all
at the Purchaser's expense;
(h) the Purchaser will be required to use storm water best management practices and it
is the Vendors preference to have storm water control and/or treatment provided on
the Property.
ror further information plC3Se contact Property and Administrative Services at 661-6600 extensions
2:!1 or 213.
Nothing herein shall be construed so as to oblige ~ITRCA to select any proposal and ~tTRCA
reserves the right to reject any/or all proposals that MrRC., in its absolute discretion. considers it
advisable to reject.
The information contained herein is offered for assistance, however the ~ITRCA assumes no
responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of same :md nothing herein shall be construed as 3.
representation. warranty or guarantee by :wTRCA.
~.
- 1
,
B139 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
- 5 .
THE HIGHEST OR -~~ OFFER ~OT :'fECESSARIL Y ACCEPTED.
~'fY IRREGUlAR OFFER MAY BE REJECTED.
Agreements of Purchase and Sale
If you are Interested in making an offer to purchase please complete four copies of the Agreement
ofPurchase and Sale by inserting your name, the price and acreage rate at the beginning and signing
the same:
All Ag:reements of Purchase and Sale are to be accompanied oy a certified .:heque in the amount of
5% orme offer. payable to The y!etropolitan Toronto and RegIon Conservanon :-\uthonty. balance
to be ~a1d :n c:lSn or cermied cheque on dosmg. Deposits ac::ompanying offers not oemg consIdered
will be :-efunded i'rompdy:
A furm or .\greement orP~rc:1ase md Sale J.nJ.ched IS fur your assIs-..:mce only
Offers to Le::L5e
If you lre lI1terested in making :l!1 otter to lease please .:omple!e fuur ::opies Or:l!1 Offer to L~ase
agreement:
All Offers to Lease are to be ac::ompanied by a. certiIied cheque in the lrnount of one ye:lr":i rent:ll
payment. pay:ble to The y!etropolitan Toronto and Region Consc::rvation Authority Deposits
ac::ompanymg offers not being considered will be refunded promptly,
Offers to Le:1se the propeItY should acknowledge that the General Terms and Conditions on pages
3 and ~ on use will apply in the case of a lease. In addition, Offers to Lease should address the
following maners, in addition to any other specific items that a prospective tenant might wish to
include in a lease of the premises:
(a) The term of the lease induding the commencement and expiry dates and any rent free
periods;
(b) The amount of rent, indusive of GST and any other taxes; the payment of realty ta."{es
and utilities :l!1d any percentage rent that might be offered;
(c) The uses that would be expected to be penmned for the premises:
(d) Arrangements for the approval by the Landlord of all nructUres and improvements to
be constructed on the premises, including future improvements and the timing of all
.-.
- I
r B140
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996
- 6 -
such improvements:
(e) The securny thaI would be offered by way ofLeners of Credit to pro tee: the landlord
agamst construction liens and the completion of the improvements:
(f) The type of generalliabiliry insurance that would be provided including the landlord
as a named insured as well as the property damage insurance and provisions for
rebuilding in the event of damage or demucrion;
(g) A general indemniry by the tenant in favour of the landlord III connection with the
tenants use and enjoyment of the premises;
(h) Acceptance of the prenuses as is. including m acknowledgement that the terlant has
done its own tests and no cllUms will be made tn COMec:lOn WIth the enVlrOnment:l1
condinon of the pre:nlses:
(i) Tenant's use or the ~re:nlses '...,11 be in compiiance WIth lillppiic:J.bie ia"" s md :l1l
charges ror developmerlt. rrunor vmances, me ~ians. buuding ?er.nits. development
charges. etC. will be the :-esponsioliiry or:he tenant md that it will J.t its cost comply
with all applicable laws:
G) Any provisions with regards to assignment. sublemng or mortgaging or the !e:lSehold
interest:
(k) Obligations for maintenance. repaIrs and inspec-..:on of the premIses.
(1) Ownership of the improvements and conditions arme premises at the end of:he term:
(m) Guarante:s.
The foregoing is a list of items that the Authoriry would wish to see addressed in my offer to le:lSe
Namrally, there may be other matters which the tenant might wish to specifically mention or that must
be dealt with at the outset and these of course should be included in the offer as well.
~~
- I
B141 I May 10,1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
THE WOODBRIDGE - KLEINBURG AREA
CITY OF VP\UGHAN
V : ./
I
- I
i
-~
\
- ,
I -."" ~\ ~
I - ~-,C:
_...C:"-
I / ~c~
I '
: ~
i \ '
, \. %
, ...
\~
~ \~
- ~ \
I ~
I
LANDS
AV.AJL.ABLE
FOR SALE ~
or LEASE ~:
""''"',,- ~ ~
011 ...7'~~. A~
~::-. (
_ "3~...-:-4~
:E .,~.....s9'
~ J.~ '
. ~ t{ ~ '.~, \
BOYD CONSERVATION AREA :'- \
r, ~;?-~~ " -'
_ '-_at:W~.::ICII -.~-
~-...........
- I
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B142
JL-_ ..m
A
A
- ,1\..."
052 ~
,l
K
~)r-'d I
I
I
I( :
~
I
I
1 )
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I i
I I
I I
=-oy:[AWNO:1:08
[--;~ -?"T.~==-~~I
J - I~ - u 1---1--1- - - . - - --
- - - - - --- -- - - ---
-. -- - .- -- - --- - - . - -
. -- - -- -- --
... - - - - -- -- ----
_. -- ------- . -----
--
B143 ,
May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
FOR USE IN THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO
AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE
PURCHASER. . offen 10 buy from
VENDOR. The Metropolitan Torouro and Region ConservatIon Awbonty, through no agem. the followmg PROPERTY:
Pan of Loc IS. Couc:euion 7. City of Vaugban. Regional Municipality of Y orlc. comaintng IS acres. more or less sinwe
at the on the east side oflsliDgton AVemle. south ofRutberfoni Road and as shown cross hatched on the attached Schedule
"A" at the PURCHASE PRICE of:
CANADIAN DO~S
($CAN ) together with any applicable GOCICb and Services Tax. If the area of the Property
as determmed by Vendor's surveyor is more or less than IS acres. the Purchase Pnce shall be increased or decreased.
as the case may be. at the nile of S per acre. calculated 10 three dectmal places.
1. PURCHASER submits with lh1s Offer 5 % or the Purchase Pnce payable by certified cheque to the Vendor as
a deposit 10 be held by it pending completIon or other lenI11DlI110n of this Agreemem and to be credited on
account of the Purchase Pnce on completion: and
2. PURCHASER agrees to pay the balance of the Purcltase Pnce by cash or cettified cbeque on closing 10 Ibe
Vendor subject to the adjustments herein provided.
3. (a) Thi5 Agreement is subject to the following conditions. which are for the benefit of Vendor. bemg
satisfied on or prior to the closing of this Il'lU1S8Ctton:
(i) the Vendor obtaimng approval of the MinIster of :-iaturai Resources permitting it 10 sell the
Property;
(UI this Agreement being approved by the ExecutIve Coamutteo and Memben of the Vendor:
(Iii) a consent has been obtained pumwtt to Section SO of the Planning Act. 1990. at Vendor's
cost, without conditions attaching thereto or if any conditions are attached to the consent. they
are satisfactory to Vendor.
If by the Closing Date these conditions are nOI satisfied. Vondor may exteud the Closing Date by
notice given at aay time up to the Closing Date to Purchaser to any date not later than December 31.
1996 (the "lAter Closing Date"). If by the Closing Date or the lAter Closing Date. these conditions
are not satisfied. the deposit with interest shall be retUnted to Purchaser and eacb of the parties shall
be releued from all of their obligations herein.
(b) Purchaser acknowledges it is solely responsible for any amounts required to be paid to aay municipal
or other governmental authority including lot levies. developmem charges or building permits or
otherwise that may be required prior to any improvemellU or buildings being constJUcted on the
Property and sucb amOWtU are not included in the Purchase Price.
(c) Purchaser sball uodertalce on closing and it shall be a condition of closing for Vendor's benefit that
Purchaser has undertaken as follows:
(i) Purchaser shall construct at its cost along the boundary between the Property and the
adjointng property of Vendor a 6 foot black vmyl clwn link fence to the standards as is then
oormal1y being constn.tcted by Vendor at its other properties withm six months of the Closing
Date;
-~-
- I
. B144
EXECUTIVE COMMITTI:E #3/96, MAY 10, 1996
2.
(u) Purchaser shall establish within six months of the CloslDg Date vegewed buffer area of
approxiDwely 10 metres wide on Vendor', propeny along the property boundary or the
Property ADd the adjoinmg property of the Vendor at Purchaser', cost consistmg or a
combination of sizes ADd species of !Wive varieties or plAll1 material in accordance WIth the
following guidelines:
30" sbJubs; 35% bareroot and 35% caliper trees with a ralio of 60% coniferous and 40%
deciduous. with respect to the bareroot and caliper trees. ail in accordance with a planting
plan prepued by Purchaser and approved in writing by Vendor. such approval not to be
umeuonably withheld:
(w) Purchaser shall comply with ail Municipal requiremems for the future use of the Property.
(d) Purchaser ackDowledges thai: the TnJDSfer/Deed to the Property ,hall comain restrictive covenants thaI
will provide as follows:
(i) prohibit the use or the Property for any purpose or use other tban a use not contrary to
Veudor', objectives and which does not negatively Unl'ACt Vendor', adjoining lands.
(u) DO storm Wiler from the Property will be permitted to enter onto Vendor', adjoining property
unless the written consent or the Vendor is first oblA\Ded:
(w) no structures. improvements or development ,hall be permitted on the Property unless and
wWl Purchaser has first:
(A) constructed 6 foot black vinyl chain linIc rences at its cost along the boundary
between the Property and the adjoinmg property of the Vendor of the staDdard as is
then normally being constructed by Vendor ror its other properties;
(B) established a vegewed buffer area of approximately 10 metres wide on Vendor's
adjoining property along the boundary of the Property and the adjoining property of
the Vendor consisting of a combination of ,izes and ,pecies of native varieties of
plant material in accordance with the following guidelines:
30% shlubs; 35% bareroot and 35% caliper trees with a ratio of 60% coniferous and
40% deciduous. with respect to the bareroot 8Dd caliper trees. ail in accordance with
a planting plan prepared by Purchaser and approved in writing by Vendor. such
approval not to be umeuonably withheld:
(C) Purchaser has satisfied Veudor it will only use Stormwater Best Management
Practices ;
(0) completed an archaeological investigation and carry out any mitigative action
satisfactory to Vendor.
Notwithstanding the work referred to in items (A), (B). (C) and (0) above has not been
completed. Purchaser may commence construction of ,tructures. improvements or
development if it has fust provided security for the doing of such worle reasonably satisfactory
to V eudor.
4. PURCHASER agrees that this Offer ,hall be irrevocable by him until 11:59 p.m. on the 4th day of June. 1996
after wbich time. if not accepted. this Offer shall be null and void and the deposit ,hall be returned to Purchaser
without interest or deduction.
"""" No. 001 IllSlO31
- 1
B145 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
3.
5. THIS Agreemem. subject to paragraph )(al. shaU be completed on the 16th day of September. 1996 (.Closlng
Date .). Upon completion. vacant possession or the property shall be given to Purchaser.
6. PURCHASER shall be allowed until 5:00 p.m. on the 1st day of August. 1996 {Requisition Date I to <:xamme
the title to the Property at his own expeme.
7. VENDOR and Purchaser agree that there is no condition. express or implied. represenwion or WlllTlUlty of any
kind that the funtre intended use of the Property by Purchaser is or will be lawful.
8. PURCHASER acknowledges having inspected the Property prior to submitting this Offer and understands that
upon the VeDdor accepting this Offer there sbail be a binding agreement of purchase and sale betWeen Purchaser
IIIli Vendor lIIIli the Purchaser agrees to accept the Property as is and acknowledges that the Purchaser has done
iu own tests and no claims will be made in connection with the enviromnental condition of the premises.
9. PURCHASER shall not caIJ for the production of any title deed. abstract. surveyor other evidence of title to
the Propeny exceplsuch as are in the possession or control of Vendor. Vendor agrees that be will deliver any
sketch or survey of the Property in his possession or within his comrol to Purchaser as soon as possible and prior
to the last day allowed for examining title.
10. PROVIDED that the title to the Property IS good and free from all registered restnction.s. charges, liens. and
encumbrances except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement and save and except for: (al any
registered restrictiolU or covenants that IUI1 with the Property providing tbat sucb are complied with: (b) any
registered municipal ~ and registered agreements with publicly regulated utilities providing such have
been complied with. or security has been posted to elUure compliance and completion: as <:videnced by a letter
from the relevant municipality or regulated utility: (c) any minor easements for the supply of domestic utility
or telephone services to the Property or adjacent properties; and (d) any easements for drainage. storm or
sanitary sewen. public utility lines. telephone lines. cable television lines or other services which do not
materially affect the present use of the Property. If within the specified times rererred to in paragraph 6 any
valid objection to title or to any outsranding municipal work order or deficiency notice. is made in writing to
Vendor and which Vendor is unable or unwilling to remove. remedy or satisfy and which Purchaser will not
waive. this Agreemem nocwithstanding any intermediate actS or negotiatiolU in respect of such objections. shall
be at an end and ail monies theretofore paid shall be returned without interest or deduction and Vendor shall not
be liable for any costs or damages. Save as to any valid objection so made by such day and except for any
objection going to the root or the title. Purchaser shall be conclusively deemed to have accepted Vendor s title
to the Property.
11. PROVIDED tbat this Agreement shall be effective to Create an interest in the Property only if the subdivision
control provisiolU of the Planning Act. 1990 are complied with by Vendor on or before completion.
12. VENDOR represents that it shall be not a non-resident of Canada within the meaning of the Income T= Act on
the Closing Date.
13. ANY realty taxes. local improvement charges shall be apportioned and allowed to tbe day of completion (the
day itself to be apportioned to Purchaser).
14. THE Tl'1IDSfer/Deed shall. save for the Land Tl'1IDSfer Tax Affidavits. be prepared in registrable form at the
expense ofVeDdor. The Transfer!Deed to be delivered on completion shall contain the statements contemplated
by clause 500") of the PUmning Act. 1990.
15. TIME shall in ail respects be of the essence bereof provided that the time for doing or .:ompleting or any maner
provided for herein may be extended or abridged by an agreement in writing signed by Vendor and Purchaser
or by their respective solicitors who are hereby expressly appointed in this regard.
16. ANY tender of notices. documents or money hereunder may be made upon Vendor or Purchaser or their
respective soliciton. Money may be tendered by bank draft or cheque certified by So Schedule 1 chartered bank
or Province of Ontario Savings Office.
"-
> !
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B146
4.
17. THIS Agreemca iDcluding sc:bcdules aIZacbad herec.o sball c:cmstiIute the entire agreement between the Purchaser
and Vendor. There is no represenwion. warnmy. colWenl agreement or coadition. whether direct or
collateral. or express or implied. which iaduced any party hereto to enter imo this Agreement or on which
l'OUmce is piKed by any such party. or which affocu this Agreement or tho Property or supported hereby other
tI:um u e:qm=saed herein. This A~ment shall be read with all changes of gender or number required by the
c:cmren. In the event of conflict between provision wriaen or typed in this agreement and any provision in the
primed portion hereof the wriIr= or typed provision sball supersede tho printed provisions to the extet1t of such
conflict.
DATED at . this _ day of . 19 -
SIGNED. SEALED AND DELIVERED ) IN WITNESS whereof! have bereunto set my !wid and seal:
in tho presence of:- )
)
)
)
) (Dale) (Purchaser)
)
)
)
) (Dale) (Purchaser)
THE UNDERSIGNED accepts the above Offer.
IN WITNESS whereof Veador has bereunto executed this Agreement.
) THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION
) CONSER V ATION AurBORITY
)
)
) Per:
(Date) )
)
) Per:
)
) We have authority to bind the Corporation
-, -
. J
I May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
B147
5.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
UWe acla10wledge receipt of a sigaed copy of this UWe acIa10wledge receipt of a sigaed copy of th1s
accepted Agreemem of Purchase aDd Sale aDd authorize accepted Agree:mc:u of Purcbue aDd Sale aDd authonze
a copy to be forwarded to my/oUJ' solicitor a copy to be forwarded to my/our solicitor
(Veudor) (Date) (Purclwer) (Date )
(Veudor) (Date) (Purchaser) (Date )
Veudor's Address Purclwer', Address
Telephone No. Telephone No.
Veudor', Solicitor Purclwer', Solicitor
Solicitor', Address Solicitor', Address
Telephone No. Telephone No.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B148
RES #E47/96- DUFFIN-ROUGE AGRICULTURE PRESERVE
Receipt of a request from the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) to comment on a
disposition strategy for the valley lands and ESA's in the Duffin-Rouge Agriculture
Preserve.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report regarding the disposition of
surplus government lands, Duffin-Rouge Agriculture Preserve be received;
THAT the Authority affirm its position that all flood plain, valley and stream corridors, conservation and
environmentally signficant lands acquired by the province for the North Pickering Project should remain
in public ownership;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to continue discussions with the Ontario Realty Corporation
with respect to the protection and acquisition of the valley and stream corridors contained within those
lands now considered surplus.
AMENDMENT
RES #E48/96
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT in paragraph two of the main motion the word .conservation" be deleted.
THE AMENDMENT WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
On December 13, 1995 the Provincial government announced its intention to sell the Duffin-Rouge
Agriculture Preserve lands. A copy of the government announcement is attached for your information,
together with a map showing the Agriculture Preserve lands located in north Pickering and the east part
of the Town of Markham, Subsequently, we received a letter dated March 22, 1996, from Mr. William
M. C. Wilson of the ORC requesting our comments on the proposal to sell the Agriculture Preserve
lands.
The Agriculture Preserve was assembled as part of the North Pickering Project, announced by the
Province in March 1972. The essence of the Project was the development of a comprehensively
planned community, that would balance urban, rural and open space uses, The basic objective of the
Agriculture Preserve was to encourage long term agriculture on the highly productive soils found in the
area. These publicly-owned lands are managed by the Province under long term farm leases.
Since 1975, Authority staff has participated in a number of planning initiatives for the lands that were
assembled for the proposed urban community, now referred to as the Seaton lands. Staff have
consistently advocated to the Province that all flood plain, valley and stream corridors, conservation
and environmentally significant lands within the entire North Pickering Project remain in public
ownership and that the Authority has a continuing interest in acquiring these lands. This is consistent
with the Authority's comments to the Federal Government in respect to the Pickering Airport lands.
B149 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RATIONALE
There are important greenspace resources within the Agriculture Preserve lands currently being
considered for disposal as surplus. A significant reach of The Little Rouge River forms the western
boundary of the preserve and a portion of the west branch of Duffins Creek containing the Whitevale
Corridor ESA, forms the eastern boundary of the preserve. The Seaton hiking trail(s), with a walking
distance of almost 10 kilometres, is located within this reach of the West Duffin Creek. In addition,
the upper end of the Petticoat Creek and its tributaries, and tributaries of the West Duffin Creek are
within the preserve.
The Authority's experience is that public ownership of valley and stream corridors is important where
the nature of the resource is such that it is critical to the ecosystem and must remain unaltered to
perform its natural functions. Regulation, planning controls and landowner stewardship have not, in
the past, been reliable protective measures. In the same light, public ownership of the flood and
erosion hazard lands is the most effective risk management approach. Public ownership ensures that
inappropriate development will not occur in hazard areas. For these reasons, staff is urging the valley
corridors, generally defined by the Authorities fill line on the Little Rouge River, West Duffin Creek and
Petticoat Creek, and designated ESA's within the preserve remain in public ownership (see attached
plan). These lands be should deleted from any proposed sale to the private sector and should be
conveyed to the MTRCA for nominal consideration.
The tributary watercourses/stream corridors have been recognized as being significant to the overall
health of the river systems and have been identified in the Authority's fill line extension program. Staff
feel it is very important that the tributary watercourses also be protected and that this could be
achieved through various means such as, conveyance to a public agency, conservation easements and
deed restrictions, and that staff is prepared to discuss these approaches with the ORC.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Acquisition of any lands would be on the basis of the Province transferring title at no cost to the
Authority. Consideration will be given to seeking partners to manage any lands which may be
acquired.
For information contact:
Ron Dewell, Extension 245
Alyson Deans, Extension 269
Don Prince, Extension 221
-
> r
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B150
STATEMENT TO iHE HOUSE BY
THE HONOURABLE DAVID JOHNSON. CHAIR OF MANAGEMENT 30ARD OF C).BINEI
DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS GOVERNMENT LANDS
DECEMBER 13. 1995
CHECK AGAINST DEUVERYMr. Speaker:
We have promised to sell marketable provincial assets such as surpius real estate holdings,
and use the proceeds for deficit reduction. This government has pledged to eliminate the
deficit because in recent years it has accumulated at a rate in excess of $ 1 million an hour
- every year - and has added to an enormous debt that is being passed on to future
generations to bear.
The province has several large-sc3fe land assemblies serving no immediate or ionger-!erm
purpose ,0 the government. These C3n be sold to contribute :0 deric:t reduction. In
addition, tnis will permit the properties to be benefic:ally developed under the gUldanca or
the appropriate municipalities.
In preparatIon for this action, I am announcing. in conjunction with my colleague ,he
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, that the ~OUSlng ?riorit'( ?olicy will be
cancelled.
It is this govemment's view that this policy is needleSSly restrictive and largely excluded
the most successful and efficient developers of housing - the private sec:or. The policy
has resulted in a prime government resourca - its real estate - being under-utilized and the
taxpayer not. achieving full benefit.
This government is getting out of the business of land banking and land develooment. This
will free up provincial properties such as Comell in east Markham. Through a Request For
Proposals. the province is pursuing the immediate marketing of this land - which we
believe will lead to timely development under the guidance of the Town of Markham. This
could involve the sale of the entire land holding, a phased sale, or a partnership between
the province and the private sector. We're prepared to entertain a variety of submissions
in order to secure the best business deal for the people of Ontario.
Oevelopment of the Seaton lands. northeast of Pickering, will move forward with the
preparation of a secondary plan. The province can potentially realize greater revenue if
Seaton is sold with a secondary plan in place. In the Duffin-Rouge Agricultural Preserve,
provinc:ally-owned agricultural land rented to farmers and other residents will be sold - by
first offering these tenants the opportunity to buy. The disposal of surplus government
lands will be done in phases. taking local market conditions into consideration.
Municipalities will ;'ave more say in deciding what kind of development makes sense in
their communities. And the private sector will be able to do what it does best":' develop
the land and create job opportunities. The province is getting Out of businesses that are
best done by munic:palities and the private sector - while keeping our promise to sell
surplus government assets to pay down the deficit.
MITTEE #3/96
~- - XECUTIVE COM
- I May 10, 1996, E
,
B151
- ~ 1
~ ~ ~-
\ } ~ .-.
' , >. 'I ~
- -",
\ ---- 0 !a " ~ .
30 . - ~ !;1 ,. I
· \ - c _. '-' ,
I , \ ___ _
I """ ,
I \ ~ __
' <.
I \ '. e.
\
\ .
\ ~ ~
~ ..
- ~ ~
: \ ~ . 0 .
~ r i ~ ~
j ~ ~ ~
~ ~ h ~
I a ~ (Z~
./ ~ ~
8 ~ (5
u ~ u
f ~ ~ ~ ~
qq
-< --- ~~~.
~ - .52,
--
00 _ _
ell _.- \ ~
UJ .- \!I l
o _
vi 51
..c \ "~.
+- \ 0 ~~~~
... - , "
o i \ t5 Pig
z ~ \ 25 ~ j _ ~
' -
", 0101
\
,
~ Ql i
. . ~ &
~ H ilH
~ ~8~8
~ [;]I~I
I
~!
S
,
~
-, ---
~ !
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B152
-
I '"
i I ' i I :tl <( l.o.I
r i : :>
. \I i - I ~
: . . . . . . a:: ;
; . a . I c.::> l.o.I : ta.
. i i ~ ;c : I 0 If) t !e
i= i: f ~ :: ' ! l.o.I
! ~ ~ a:: I , I ~
!O!; =-... i; U1 0- : : ~ I
~ a i !: -~ :: I~ !,.
~ -~ I w <(
I! ~ Ii ~a ~ . ~ ' ~ . ~ 1_' t
Ii Ii . :.l I.IJ
. ~ I wll i ~W I
~~!I CI~ I
iO I 0
.
I
i
3:;-
~
~
::t:
a::
::::::,
Q
",..
.,
a
0:
h
lLJ
~
~ ~
ct:
a \W
>-
--- - -- ------ ----.-._------ - ---
B153 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RES #E49/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISmON PROJECT, 1996-2000
Purchase of property, located north of Elgin Mills Road, west of Yonge Street, in
the Town of Richmond Hill, under the "Greenspace Protection And Acquisition
Project 1996-2000, Flood Plain and Conservation Component - Don River
Watershed." Flood Plain Component, Don River Watershed
Kendred Investment Ltd. Property
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.314 acres, more or less, consisting of an
irregular shaped parcel of vacant land, be purchased from Kendred Investments Umited, said land being
Part of Lot 18, Registered Plan 1642, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, fronting on
the south side of Brookside Road, west of Burndean Court, situate north of 8gin Mills Road, west of
Yonge Street;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A 131/95, Authority Meeting #4/95, May 26, 1995, approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with Kevin Lethbridge, Kevin F. Lethbridge Associates,
representative of the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence
with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10,1996 B154
RATIONALE
The subject property is part of the flood plain of the German Mills creek and falls within the
Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
It is proposed to turn over the lands to the Town of Richmond Hill under a management agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004-11-502.
For information contact:
Ron Dewell, Extension 245
B155 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RES #E50/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Masonry Contract
This report advises on the results of masonry work quotations received by the Authority as part of
Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #9/96.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #9/96,
dated April 23, 1996, on masonry quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the masonry work associated with the
first phase of the Don Valley Brick Works site restoration to Canadian Building Restoration for the
amount of $374,460 (excluding GST), and subsequent stages not to exceed a total budget of 423,097
(excluding GST ........................................................ CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Don Valley Brick Works was purchased in 1987. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
accepted the site for management under agreement with the Authority in 1989. The site consists of
16.5 hectares in the valley of the Don River, located west of Bayview Avenue in the Borough of East
York. The site contains an assemblage of buildings formerly used by the brick making industry
between 1890 and 1990.
During 1994-95, a number of studies were undertaken to provide the necessary information to refine
the scope of the regeneration work for the consultant team preparing the detailed site plan. These
studies included detailed environmental site assessments; heritage documentation and analysis; artifact
recording; and, brick making processes. The consultant team lead by Oleson Worland Architects
compiled the Master Plan in January of 1996, and have subsequently finalized detailed construction
plans and tender specifications for the various aspects of the restoration work required at the site.
Public input was received at a number of community meetings.
With respect to the masonry restoration work, Oleson Worland Architects and Vanbots Construction
Group, the project construction manager, prequalified contractors experienced in this type of work.
Based on this prequalification, the following companies were asked to submit bids:
Caligo Inc.
Canadian Building Restoration
Clifford Restoration
Colonial Building Restoration
Maxim Group
Ontario Restoration
Summit Restoration.
All of the firms, except for Ontario Restoration submitted bids. Ontario Restoration declined to bid due
to scheduling issues. The results of Tender Opening Sub-Committee #9/96 are:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B156
~nntrar.tnr Rid
Caligo Inc. $ 702,650.00
Canadian Building Restoration $ 644,842.00
Clifford Restoration $ 996,902.50
Colonial Building Restoration $1,100,000.79
Maxim Group $ 757,770.00
Ontario Restoration Declined
Summit Restoration. $1,751,217.79
RATIONALE
A general review and analysis was conducted with the two low bidders. It was determined that
although the scope of work was complete, the original bids were substantially over budget. Based on
the preliminary reviews and discussions with the two low bidders as well as a re-evaluation of the work
required, a Post Tender Addendum was issued.
The Post Tender Addendum results were: Cali go Inc. $518,233, and Canadian Building Restoration
$429,227. Canadian Building Restoration remained the low bidder.
To ensure continued control of the project costs, staff recommend the masonry work be awarded in
stages. The first stage will include the masonry work associated with the restoration of Buildings 1, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10. This work will cost $374,460. Additional masonry work on Buildings 11, 12,
14, 15, an 16 will total $54,767. The additional work, if required, will also be staged and awarded
only if the expenditures are within the overall project budget.
Based on this information, staff recommend the award of contract to Canadian Building Restoration in
the amount of $374,460.
FINANCIAL DEI AILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344, Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Report prepared by: Nick Saccone (ext.301)
For information contact: Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
--....
~ J
B157 I May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
. DON VALLEY B R I C K WORKS REGENERATION
1 995 MASTER P LA N
EXISTING BUILDINGS
PLANT AT CON VALLEY I
BRICK WORKS. 1994
I OUM....
LEGENO I I
-- 017
1 Olhc. I I I -'i I
I
2 Showroom I
/ : 4 I I
3 WUSono Sholl
4 S......u.- 510'-0. / I I I
5 Lunc"room / )1~ P I
5& 7 s.M. u.- Bnck , !Tlls! I I
PfoducllOn I
6.7 , I
8 Sand.u.- Bnck Slorav. l' ! 2 III I :.J.J I
SMd t'tF)
9 O.."S".1e SIO'-O. I I
10 0..,/5"... GnncllnQ I I i i...J
, I , I
Plant I , I I 16
I I
11 Sc,_nlng end Ouet I i I
CollectIOn . . - I, I
118 Slack Snck O.....r
l1C Fan Roam 8 15 I
12 Hold"'O Roam 1.1 I
13 Snek Slorag. SMd . . - .
14 W....Cut 8nc1t 13l I
ProOuctlOn Plant I
15 0....."'-.. Snek
ProductIOn Plant I 1
16 Tunnel KoIne end O.....r I I
I I
17 .V aile.,' C1umne., II. -'
18 Gat. HouI. - -
- -
) - --
- .-
-
-
-
- -.- - C"1 -
- _#--
-' - - -- E .lr"...1
, \ .- .
-
.- --
-
-
- (\."-.""'"
...
,
...
....
-
....
....
-- --.- -- --- ---
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B158
RES #51/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Selective Demolition Contract
This report advises on the results of selective demolition work quotations received by the Authority as
part of Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #6/96.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMIITEE RECOMMENDS THAT Report #6/96, dated April 19, 1996, on selective
demolition quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the demolition work associated with
the first phase of the Don Valley Brick Works site restoration to Greenspoon Bros. Ltd. for the amount
of $113,208 (excluding GST), and subsequent stages not to exceed a total budget of $162,313,00
(excluding GSn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Don Valley Brick Works was purchased in 1987. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
accepted the site for management under agreement with the Authority in 1989. The site consists of
16.5 hectares in the valley of the Don River, located west of Bayview Avenue in the Borough of East
York. The site contains an assemblage of buildings formerly used by the brick making industry
between 1890 and 1990.
During 1994-95, a number of studies were undertaken to provide the necessary information to refine
the scope of the regeneration work for the consultant team preparing the detailed site plan. These
studies included detailed environmental site assessments; heritage documentation and analysis; artifact
recording; and, brick making processes. The consultant team lead by Oleson Worland Architects
compiled the Master Plan in January of 1996, and have subsequently finalized detailed construction
plans and tender specifications for the various aspects of the restoration work required at the site.
Public input was received at a number of community meetings.
With respect to the demolition work, Oleson Worland Architects and Vanbots Construction Group, the
project construction manager, prequalified contractors experienced in this type of work. Based on this
prequalification, the following companies were asked to submit bids:
Delsan Demolition
Greenspoon Bros. Ltd.
Maxtech Environmental
Vic Priestly Demolition
Only Greenspoon Bros. and Vic Priestly Demolition elected to submit bids. Both Maxtech
Environmental and Delsan Demolition declined to submit bids due to scheduling difficulties. The results
of Tender Opening Sub-Committee #6/96 are:
Cnntrar.tnr Rid
Delsan Demolition Declined
Greenspoon Bros. $111,500
Maxtech Environmental Declined
Vie Priestly Demolition $133,000
B159 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RATIONALE
A general review and analysis was conducted with the two low bidders. Although both bidders met all
of the criteria of the tender process, it was determined that the scope of work was not complete for
either tender. Based on the preliminary reviews and discussions with the two low bidders, a Post
Tender Addendum was issued to ensure that a complete, and comparable, scope of work was included
by both bidders.
The Post Tender Addendum results were: Greenspoon Bros. $162,313 and Vic Priestly Demolition
$173,050. Greenspoon Bros. remained the low bidder.
To ensure continued control of the project costs, staff recommend the demolition work be awarded in
stages. The first stage will include the demolition work associated with the restoration of Buildings 1,
3,4,5,6, 7, 9, and 10. This work will cost $113,208. Additional demolition work on Buildings 11,
12, 14, 15, and 16 will total $49,105. The additional work, if required, will also be staged and
awarded only if the expenditures are within the overall project budget.
Based on this information, staff recommend the award of contract to Greenspoon Bros. Ltd. in the
amount of $113,208.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Report prepared by: Nick Saccone (ext.301)
For information contact: Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
Date: 96.04.25
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B160
RES #E52/96 - DON V ALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Structural Steel Contract
This report advises on the results of structural steel work quotations received by the Authority as part
of Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #7/96.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Los Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Report #7/96, dated April 19, 1996, on structural
steel quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contact for the structural steel work associated
with the first phase of the Don Valley Brick Works site restoration be awarded to M & G Steel Ltd. for
the amount of $ 348,800. (excluding GST), and subsequent stages not to exceed a total budget of
$476,300 (excluding GST) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Don Valley Brick Works was purchased in 1987. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
accepted the site for management under agreement with the Authority in 1989. The site consists of
16.5 hectares in the valley of the Don River, located west of Bayview Avenue in the Borough of East
York. The site contains an assemblage of buildings formerly used by the brick making industry
between 1890 and 1990.
During 1994-95, a number of studies were undertaken to provide the necessary information to refine
the scope of the regeneration work for the consultant team preparing the detailed site plan. These
studies included detailed environmental site assessments; heritage documentation and analysis; artifact
recording; and, brick making processes. The consultant team lead by Oleson Worland Architects
compiled the Master Plan in January of 1996, and have subsequently finalized detailed construction
plans and tender specifications for the various aspects of the restoration work required at the site.
Public input was received at a number of community meetings.
With respect to the structural steel component of the work, Oleson Worland Architects and Vanbots
Construction Group, the project construction manager, prequalified contractors experienced in this type
of work. Based on this prequalification, the following companies were asked to submit bids:
Benson Steel
M & G Steel
Modern Railings & Metalcratt
Tressman Steel.
All of the firms submitted bids. The results of Tender Opening Sub-Committee #7/96 are:
~nntra~tnr Bid
Benson Steel $ 704,000
M & G Steel $ 601,200
Modern Railings & Metalcratt $ 951,500
Tressman Steel. $ 877 ,000
B161 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RATIONALE
It was determined that although the scope of work was complete, the original bids were substantially
over budget. As the low bidder was significantly lower than the other bidders, a general review and
analysis was conducted with that company. Through these discussions it was determined that
alternate methods of construction as well as alternate design ideas could offer substantial savings.
Based on the preliminary reviews and discussions with the low bidder, a Post Tender Addendum was
issued to the low bidder. The revised bid for work to all of the buildings was $476,300.
To ensure continued control of the project costs, staff recommend the structural steel work be
awarded in stages. The first stage will include work for Buildings 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10. This
work will cost $348,800. Additional structural work on Buildings 11, 12, 14, 15, and 16 will total
$127,800. The additional work, if required, will also be staged and awarded only if the expenditures
are within the overall budget.
Based on this information, staff recommend the award of contract to M & G Steel Ltd. In the amount
of $348,800.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Report prepared by: Nick Saccone (ext.301)
For information contact: Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
Date: 96.04.25
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B162
RES #53/96 - DON V ALLEY BRICK WORKS REGEN ERA TION PROJECT
Scaffolding Contract
This report advised on the results of general scaffolding work quotations received by the Authority as
part of Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #11/96.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMIITEE RECOMMENDS THAT Report # 11/96, dated April 26, 1996, on general
scaffolding quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the scaffolding work associated with
the first phase of the Don Valley Brick Works site restoration to Skyway Equipment Co. Limited for the
amount of $71,924 (excluding GST), and subsequent stages not to exceed a total budget of $124,144
(excluding GST). ....................................................... CARRIED
KEY ISSUE
This report advises on the results of general scaffolding work quotations received by the Authority as
part of Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #11/96.
BACKGROUND
The Don Valley Brick Works was purchased in 1987. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
accepted the site for management under agreement with the Authority in 1989. The site consists of
16.5 hectares in the valley of the Don River, located west of Bayview Avenue in the Borough of East
York. The site contains an assemblage of buildings formerly used by the brick making industry
between 1890 and 1990,
During 1994-95, a number of studies were undertaken to provide the necessary information to refine
the scope of the regeneration work for the consultant team preparing the detailed site plan. These
studies included detailed environmental site assessments; heritage documentation and analysis; artifact
recording; and, brick making processes. The consultant team lead by Oleson Worland Architects
compiled the Master Plan in January of 1996, and have subsequently finalized detailed construction
plans and tender specifications for the various aspects of the restoration work required at the site.
Public input was received at a number of community meetings.
With respect to the scaffolding component of the work, Oleson Worland Architects and Vanbots
Construction Group, the project construction manager, prequalified contractors experienced in this type
of work. Based on this prequalification, the following companies were asked to submit bids:
All Systems
Aluma Systems
Scaffold Connection
Skyway Equipment
Tower Scaffolding
All the firms submitted bids.
B163 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
The results of Tender Opening Sub-Committee #11/96 are:
Cnntrar.tnr Ra!;:A Rid RAntal PArind Fnr Ra~A Rid
All Systems $ 92,6201 month
Aluma Systems $116,0541 month
Scaffold Connection $277,1223 months
Skyway Equipment $ 90,4971 month
Tower Scaffolding $290,9866 months
RATIONALE
A general tender review and analysis was conducted and it was determined that the scope of work
was complete. A spreadsheet was prepared to calculate the total cost of scaffolding with respect to
the three lowest bidders, based on the anticipated work duration for each building. The monthly rental
rate and applicable taxes were added to the base bid on a building by building basis. The total
anticipated cost for each building is shown on the following table. The work durations allowed for are
noted in column 1.
Don Valley Brick Works
SCAFFOLDING
Skyway All System Aluma
Bldg. #1 17092 24384 22632
2 months
Bide. #4 15898 19530 19022
2 months
Bldg. #7 5776 7800 2513
1 month
Bide. #9 14954 14784 26917
3 month external
2 month internal
Bide. #10 1 8204 19020 44152
3 month external
2 month internal
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B164
Bide. #11 52220 41260 35364
3 month external
2 month internal
Total 124144 126778 150600
Based on this information, staff recommend the award of contract to Skyway Equipment Co. Ltd. in the
amount of $71,924 to complete the scaffolding work for Buildings 1, 4, 7, 9 , and 10. Additional
scaffolding work for Building 11 will cost $52,220. The additional scaffolding work will be awarded
only if the expenditure is within the overall project budget.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Report prepared by: Nick Saccone (ext.301)
For information contact: Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
Date: 96.04.25
B165 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES #E54/96 - JAMES McKEAN PROPERTY FRENCHMAN'S BAY AREA
Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham
Receipt of a request from the Town of Pickering to consider possible participation in the purchase of
land on the east side of Frenchman's Bay.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Enrico
THAT the letter from the Town of Pickering dated May 6, 1996 be received;
THAT staff be directed to enter into discussions with the Town of Pickering, James McKean and Price
Waterhouse Ltd. - Trustee, regarding possible participation in the acquisition of 2.5 acres more or less,
of land together with certain improvements locater on the west side of Front Road, south of
Commerce Street, in the Town of Pickering, Regie-'al Municipality of Durham;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report concerning this matter to the members of the Authority at the
earliest possible date. .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority is in receipt of a letter from the Town of Pickering (see attached) requesting the
Authority to consider participation, in partnership with the Town of Pickering, to secure a key property
on Frenchman's Bay. As noted on the attached map, substantial lands surrounding the Bay are in the
ownership of the Authority.
The subject holding consists of two irregularly shaped parcels under the registered ownership of Keen
Kraft Marina Co. Limited and James McKean. Keen Kraft Marina Co. Limited was petitioned into
bankruptcy on June 15, 1995 anc l)rice Waterhouse Limited has been appointed as the Trustee.
The property is located on the east side of Frenchman's Bay and is more particularly described as Part
of Water Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and Part of Water Lot 3, Plan 65, Town of Pickering (see attached
location map) and is municipally known as 680 Front Road.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 223.
For information contact: Don Prince, extension 221 or Mike Fenning, extension 223.
Date: 1996.05.06
~.
~ J
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B166
~
'nle ~
of ate
Town cI PIda!Iini
May 6, l~
Mayan otftce
PIclIInIt eM: '-- 'Ibc ldI:n:IpaUra Tarama ai
ClnIlIII_
I'Iarann& 0IlIIIl0 lleaica ~Auzbarity
c:..a , ShwtdsI.A Drive
LIV 61Q
TaraaIO, Omazia
1M!: N3B 1S4
T& ., 4.....
PIl CIOSl.....
~ .A~"". Mr. Ric:har:1 O'Bri.c:a
T& 19O5l4~
ttmI MW7IO
Pal lWOS143GIS Subjcc::Pid=iag Purc!:aIe fl"am lama McKaa ami PnaI Wmmcu.e Limit=1
Tnzs= oftbc Eszm afXeaa Xzd Mazma Ce. T -~ q,...~ as
Port PU:lcI::rma MariDa
.l.Qu I, 2. 3(pa:t). 4, S, 6 ami 7. Plaa ~, P1ck:rins
. Out File R.E9~~
We In! pr:scznJy ~ with Pnce WazmDau.c limited aDd lama McKean
~tbe acquWticu of the ~ landa framma em F~'I Bay.
My purpose fer writ:mg to you is tD ftlqUat 1bm me M'I'RCA cnnmn-
puti~ ~Ily wUh the Town at Piciz:riq ill the acqWsitiaD of tbcIcl
Iaada.
Yours uuly,
&~~~
W&)'IIO Artbms, B.A., SoU
Mayor
Town ofPickcriDa
cc: P. Wyp, TOWD Scliciulr
~ !
B167 I May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
- .
L -
t Authority Lands
~;,';-~ :'1"'-= I".;":~,,," _,. James McKean Prope
~ -)\~~,~.~:\ ;,~ ....!~~~,~~--.
'\'\~I ~'..1;~"1_; ::~:~;;~: ...,:'
: -
,
"\ '.. -
-
":l .. .- -
'. : .- .- --
: -
-\ '. ,
-.
.- .. - :. -
,.
-:---:: ., " -
,..
, .' ". - -
- ' - .
..: -= -
._~~ .~~~~-:~ ::.~ ,. , -
..
'-- -
I
-
J
,-
-- - -
.
=
- -
.., -. -
.:..... - -
.- --
) ~ -:
. " .. c:.-'.- ..'\ .--
J -- - -
; ~-
~i- -
-
- -
.
, '-\ -" .-; :. -":.'~
-.. ..; _- .~.......,jU.
.. --. - - # -,- ."-
- .. t .._.;.~. =,..,., ~~::~~
":II ;,c.J -'J~ ---.::.
- -...... -'-'- ~ ='_ ~ ,:;-=-=-::x:
~ , --' . ~. u. ~ . ~.
, -_._~ --1':'--; - -
~ ~ - :. I _ -;. --::-
... .. ... .. 1_-...
~.a',C-c~::- -
FRENCHMAN's BAY ~. -"'7=~-~ ~ -~
., ~ _',' :t).~ ;:".,::._-~
t;-" .:.. H ~.. 0 .. ~
,~ ~)(::l -;
_- I _ _.....,
_u_ .. \~... ~~iJ.o ~ '6
___..'1. ... .......o::a.~..::~ ~. ..
. .. . '.:::-- 'i;"cv = c..;:l:I~CCC'
.. 31. ~'~~-' -~ _"'_, .'
.. - . '. - ,. g;. _ - I ~~ ....;
.-.. .--- -' =:.: _'\~ -~~.
.~ .' .- ~- ~-~c - , 't:
Cj
c:' .. .. - I _ ,-- .. ..... -
,"':l u. .. ~
co .a.. -... '.'
,= ,
...:1 .. ,- ..-
:::It ,.-
~ --- \
1- ...---. -
.-
Ie .. "--
_tl -
-<7i ;;. .. I -
! ,I " -
. -.af . .
'I
..,.- I:; .'1 ' .
...
~ ; :
- I :, :
iftJ 1 I -
, - I I /'
, , ,(,
~. .
...
LAKE ONTARIO
~
- I
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B168
.
i~- [[[[ITIt
L.UNA CR"
AVE:.
I
.
.
FRENCHMAN IS .
BAY 8SI
I BROAI
McKean Ownership 00
A : 0.83ha (2.0 acres)
B : 0.19ha (0.48 acres) Owned mt
others
STREI
,
..J
0
0
- ... ll.
- cr
LoJ
~
..J
- -
B169 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RES. #E55/96 - HIRING TRINITY STUDIO FOR THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON
THE HUMBER RIVER WATERSHED DRAFT GOALS, OBJECTIVES
AND ACTIONS
Appointment of Trinity Studio to assist staff with the second round of public consultations on the Draft
Goals, Objectives and Actions for the Humber River Watershed Strategy.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT Trinity Studio be hired to assist with public consultation for the Humber River Watershed
Strategy at a cost of $15,675.50 including GST. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This is a sole source request for approval to hire the services of Trinity Studio for the second round of
public consultations.
Trinity Studio has been working with the Humber Watershed Task Force and staff of the Metropolitan
and Region Conservation Authority (MTRCA) over the past five months to achieve the following aims:
. build constituency for the Humber Watershed Strategy and the MTRCA
. train staff in preparation for working with the public and designing participatory
exercises to obtain input into the Humber Watershed Task Force Vision and
Principles
. host meetings with members of the public for the purpose of obtaining input into
the Humber Watershed Task Force Vision and Principles
. write and present animations (scenes) relating information about the Humber
Watershed in an informative and entertaining way
In addition, Trinity was able to bring $7,500 of their own funding from a private corporate source into
the MTRCA to fund more than half the project from January to April, 1996. (MTRCA provided
$4999.00)
The recommendation to sole source the second round of public consultation is based on:
. positive response to Trinity's methods in the first round of consultation, their
contacts in the field and knowledge of the Humber Watershed
. innovative approaches to involving the public
. ability to work with staff to design and conduct the public meetings thereby
augmenting staff capability
. the shadow benefits which will accrue, at no expense to MTRCA, after the
consultations, as Trinity continues its work with school boards in watershed
education around the GT A
. the additional cost that would be incurred in bringing on a new set of consultants
to get to know the Humber Watershed, as well as the break in continuity with
shareholders who have already been involved and who expect to be contacted for
a second round.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B170
RES #E56/96 - TENDER OPENING SUB-COMMITTEE
Computerized Records Management System
Proposals were received from a number of suppliers for the development and/or provision of computer
software to replace the Authority's existing Records Management System. Proposals were opened as
part of a tender opening on April 12, 1996, and referred to staff for a report.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the Report #5/96 of the Tender Opening Sub-Committee be received;
AND FURTHER THAT Proposal #IS-01/96, Computerized Records Management System, be awarded to
Microdea Inc., in the amount of $27,600 it being the lowest proposal received which best met the
specifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority is currently using a computerized Records Management System called Record Master, In
1994, the developers of Record Master became insolvent and support for their product ceased. As a
result, we need to replace the existing system in order to manage properly the 40,000 files we
currently have and meet future records needs of the Authority.
The goal of this project is to develop a Computerized Records Management System that has the
following characteristics:
. Windows based
. easy to use
. locates required information quickly
. employs the use of electronic communication through E-Mail
. decentralizes access to records and yet retains centralized control where needed
. flexible to allow additional features such as document imaging and electronic
document management when required
. the ability to minimize the number of keystrokes required to do basic tasks such
as: searching for files, signing out files, signing in files, and creating new files
. information should be displayed in a way that minimizes the number of screens
that users will encounter
. compatability with other Authority data base applications
. based on technology that will support and evolve with future Authority needs
B171 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RATIONALE
Attached is a summary of the proposals received. Having reviewed the Authority's records
management needs, we selected a proposal based on Lotus Notes, a groupware document based
database product. This system will allow us to link databases together that are currently designed as
islands of information. Furthermore, we will be able to communicate electronically to each other
thereby reducing the amount of time spent on tracking paper based information. The proposal from
Microdea best meets the specifications.
The proposal from Zasio Enterprises would enable the Authority to replace its existing system, but
would add little value for future development. The Zasio system is an excellent product used by
municipalities, but in the long run, the Lotus Notes solution is preferable.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for this proposal are included in the Finance and Administration Division budget account #001
50 384.
Report prepared by: James W. Dillane, extension 220
For information contact: Grant Eberlin, extension 239
Date: 1996.04.26
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B172
Microdea
Product Training Data Conversion Total Canadian Adjusted
Content Total
20,125.00 5,175.00 2,300.00 27,600.00 2,760.00 24,840.00
. Point 1.4.2 - infrastructure of Company ensures that the necessary skills and backup can be called
upon (emphasis added)
. source code will be provided
. includes a 3 month fine tuning & warranty period
. $22,000 plus taxes (includes development & training) $25,300 (includes taxes) Canadian Content
applies
. additional $2,000 for data conversion (two day estimate) $2,300 (includes taxes)
. correctly identified that data conversion will not be trivial and that some data from Record Master
may not find a home in Notes
. typical response time to an urgent page call is within 1 hour, changes vary from hours to days
depending on complexity and they can be done remotely
. use Watermark as thier document management tool
. 30 K average image size
. very complete proposal, seemed to discuss some important points about record management
. projected $1 million in 1996 sales
Recommendation:
It is our recommendation that Microdea be selected as the preferred vendor. Our recommendation is
based on the following criteria: a firm figure was given, a clear understanding of the Authority's
records management needs was exhibited, adds value to our current processes through automation,
will be able to incorporate other related databases currently in use, reduces the reliance on a paper
based process through electronic communication, enables Authority staff to enhance various
aspects of the application as needs change, support is locally based, and source code is stored on
site.
B173 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
Zasio Enterprises - Versatile Records Management
Product Maintenance Consulting (5 days) Training Total Can $ Total
(includes data
conversion)
12,995.00 1,995.00 3,400.00 1,360.00 19,750.00 26,431.43
. the Canadian dollar figure is based on an exchange rate of 1.3383 Canadian $ per US $
. Consulting does not include expenses.
. Source code held in escrow by law firm in Boise, Idaho at cost of Zasio.
. E-mail not available, only planned
. extensive security
. allows pick lists
. the Windows version has only been available since March 1996
. record creation requests are placed in a queue which is accessible only by administrators, automatic
notification is not available, printed reports may be automatically generated
. checking out folders is only done from the search area, not the file folder maintenance screen
. only at login users are reminded of overdue files
. can't do cascading keyword field pick lists
. can't do default values in field, eg, Yes or No, the user would have to enter the information
. import has been done successfully into Record Master, we can use a separate import package
($1,531.35 CAN) or pay them $910CAN per day.
. no toll free line, limited techical support in Mississauga, most support from US in Idaho from 9:00
am to 7:00 pm EST, with either an immediate response or maximum 2 hour call back.
. e-mail of reports is manually done by creating a report and then attaching it to an email document
. replication of databases is not possible, external users have to use some other package that can
produce ASCII data and then it has to imported...not a convenient task
. full text indexing of electronically stored documents would require a great deal of storage space
. Versatile does not currently apply proper security constraints to attached documents... they only
have plans
. can't mark up scanned images
. average scanned image size (no graphics) is 66 K
Recommendation:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B174
This product will meet most of our current requirements, however, we would have to modify the
process we follow in order to use their product. Versatile does not add any value to our current
records management process, rather it essentially replicates what we are doing today. This would
be our second choice.
B175 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
Townsend, Merkis, & Associates - Trim for Windows
Product Maintenance Conversion, Training Total
Installation, Travel
& Living expenses
17,621.45 2,832.45 5,290.00 2,300.00 28,043.90
. based in Ottawa, acts as a sales rep. for Tower software which is an Australian firm
. a module based system based on a ISAM database
. currently offering a 30 % discount
. 32 user system $21,890, after discount $15,323
. support in Ottawa, Washington, and Australia
. total price $24,579 (including taxes), annual support (no gst) $2,463 first year, $3,284 subseqent
years
. software held in escrow
. good records management system but not too flexible for future addition of other requirements
. uses Watermark or WANG for Document Imaging
. full text searches of attached documents is not available
. security is only applicable to the complete record, not partial
. several things are not supported in TRIM, some are planned in the future
. full audit trail not provided as of yet
. security is being overhauled
. no concept of groups, yet
. the on-line help is available, but if modified may not point to the right place in future versions
. Windows version only available since April 1995, not as long in Canada
Recommendation:
Based upon the submitted proposal, this vendor would be our third choice. In order to meet some of
Authority's needs, it would appear that future development is required. At this stage, we are not
prepared to wait for development promises.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B176
Vikara Group Inc.
Product Maintenance Conversion Training Total Canadian Adjusted
Content Total
13,800.00 33,000.00 No amount 3,312.00 50,112.00 5,011.20 45,100.80
given
. Lotus Notes Solution
. $15,922 (including GST, no PST), however, their pricing is subject to change
. in order to receive a firm quotation the Architectural Analysis phase has to be carried out at $4,320
. maintenance is based on a total of 16 hours per month, at $1,600 per month for a minimum of one
year
. any maintenance above that amount of hours is chargeable at between $120 - $180 per hour
. defect changes made within 2 days, maximum wait time should not be greater than 2 weeks
. modifications can be done over a remote connection to the Notes server.
. the Verity full-text inherint search engine allows any user to perform full text searches
. full abilities to secure documents is available
. Lotus Notes: Document Imaging is their suggested document imaging solution
. average letter size is 100 k
. images can add annotations without changing the originals
. have extensive Lotus Corp. experience, but basically made up of 2 people with access to other
developers it appears.
. no mention of source code
Recommendations:
The Vikara Group did not seem to exhibit records management system experience. As well, the
Authority would have to commit to a $4,320 (plus taxes) expenditure to obtain a final cost. This
proposal did not provide us with the comfort that they understood the Authority's needs.
B177 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
J.R. Jacob & Associates Ltd.
Product Maintenance Conversion Training Total Canadian Adjusted
Content Total
45,800.00 5,100.00 No amount 3,200.00 54,100.00 5,410.00 48,690.00
given
. too expensive, not enough detail
Recommendation: No
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B178
TENDER OPENING SUB-COMMITTEE - REPORT #5/96
April 12, 1 996
5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario.
The Tender Opening Sub-Committee met on Friday, April 12, 1996 at 9:50 a.m. to open tenders for
MIS-01/96, being a request for a Computerized Records Management System.
PRF~FNT Vice Chair: Lois Hancey
Staff: Director, Facilities and Operations Ken Owen
Director, Finance and Administration Jim Dillane
Network System Specialist Grant Eberlin
Administrative Assistant Paula Leggieri
The tenders for MIS-Q1 196, are as follows:
r.nmp~ny T enrler
J.R. Jacob & Associates Limited $54,100.00
Microdea $27,600.00
TMA $28,043.90
The Vikara Group $50,112,00
Zasio Enterprises Inc. $26,431.43
IT WAS AGREED AND RECOMMENDED THAT the tenders received as listed above be referred to staff
for review and report.
Ipl.
B179 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RES #E57/96 - TENDER OPENING SUB-COMMITTEE TENDER ES-96-05
Tender for the rental of heavy construction equipment and operator
The Tender Opening Sub-Committee opened tenders for the supply of heavy construction equipment
and operators on March 29, 1996. The tenders received were referred to staff for review and report.
THAT the Watershed Management Division utilize, as required, the service of Sartor and Susin Umited
for the rental of construction equipment with operators during 1996 that being the lowest quotation
received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to use the attached list to select additional equipment based
on the next lowest tender if the need arises. ................................... CARRIED
BACKGROUND
A request for tenders was placed in the Daily Commercial News.
The rental of the construction equipment with operator is to be utilized by the Watershed Management
Division in carrying out the 1996 work programs.
Our decision regarding the low quotation is based on our comparison of a list of equipment commonly
used in our work which would give us the best package over the 1 996 work period. A total of 6
tenders were received. Our analysis of the quotations, which are attached for your information,
indicates that Sartor and Susin Limited is the lowest quotation received.
In the event that Sartor and Susin Limited cannot supply all our equipment needs during the peak
construction periods, we feel it would be prudent to be able to use the attached list to select
equipment from the company which provides the next lowest tender price. This will be dependant on
what equipment is specified and will help ensure that equipment is always available.
For information contact: Jim Tucker (ext. 247)
Date: 1996.04.02
Attach.
File: f:\ss\pubhc\exec\heavy.eqp
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 8180
e
Q
~~ 8 8
Q2 ~ ~
~- ~ ~
m! * *
Q
(.)
e
Q~ 0 0
u~ ~ 0
~Q 0 ~
~ E ~ ~
~ * 0
Q
.5
~ 0 0
=. 0 0
:= u . .
tlSe 0 0
~- ~ ~
u * 0
~
"")
e
Q
tIS~ 0 0 0 0
~:= ~ ~ ~ ~
_~ ~ ~ 0 ~
w~ ~ ~ ~ ~
e 0 0 0 0
Q
(.)
e_ ~ 0 0 0
tIS .- O'l O'l O'l 0
~~ O'l M
tlSe ~ O'l ~ O'l ~
eQ 0 ~ ~ M ~
tIS(.) ~ * ~ N 0
(.) 0 0 0
... cOO 0 ~ 0
Q _ 0 ~ 0 N 0
i~~ ~ N ~ ~ ~
en en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
* 000 0
?:
... 'u
Q ~ tIS
~ Q. ...
w U tIS w.
~ :J U ~ < _
;:) .Q ~ U ~.r;
O _ 'iii u:J a::.!?
.r; c :J ~ 0 ~
~ aQ) .- ~ ~
.- NEw E ~
a:: ~'iij:Z: Q D. E :J W.!
w >_ ~Z C > :J E en U
CD a Q) ;: 0 '" ~ E'- ~:2
CD C 13:> E >'2.5 Q 4l
~ ~ '~:J a::~ ~ <.- E - >
~ !!!.Q 0< - :> E '" W en
8, Q ~- ~~ M :> '" E ~ ~
!!! 3: 8'.5 ~ ~ ~ S E M < 51
tIS qo EE a::C ~ - ~ ~ a::
(.) I Q ~o Q :z: 'C 'C < E
a:: E:J c (.) Q. ~ tIS tIS uJ :JE
W Ww E ~ Q Q a::
Q .-'" > 0 - - .-
CE 0 - > > e
<.- - oJ tIS tIS ~.-
o E ~ ~ i2.5 ~ Q. Q. W E
~ "M ~ (.).5 lll:: C) C) zQ C)
Q ~N W< E (.) ~ ~ ~
a1 0 I ~= ~ ~ S< S<'E t: 8
~ 8~ 3:ffi ~~ ~ 0 OtIS I 0
Z ~~ Q ~ N lll:: ~ M ~ D. ~
o ~ N o~ < ~'iij (.) ~ N U ~ N
a::. 0 0 ;:)
~ ~ ~ ~ a:: ~ N Q ~
B181 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
c
o
~~ 8
U ::l .
0.. Ln
~- Ln
m ! 0(/)0
o
U
c
o~ 8
U.- .
GlQ Ln
:tE <C
Gl 0(/)0
e
.5
~ 0 g 0
::l . 0 0
IDU Ln 0 0
~.5 Ln <C "
:t 0(/)0 0(/)0 0(/)0
..,
c
o
- oog 0 0 0
IDU 00 0 0 ~
Q. ::l . . . . . 0
~~ LnLnO Ln Ln ~
WW <c~m ~ m ~
g 0(/)00(/)00(/)0 0(/)0 0(/)0 0(/)0
u
c_ oLnLn Ln 0 0 0
.!!!'S N<C" N ~ N"
~~ 'N~ 8' ~ ~ ~
cC ~~Ln ~ 0 Ln
ID 0 m~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
UU 0(/)00(/)00(/)0 0(/)0 0(/)0 0(/)0 0(/)0
.. gLno goo 0
o E NO 0 0 Ln
i~~ ~NN ~ ~ N M
W W Ln<C" Ln <C "m
0(/)00(/)00(/)0 0(/)0 0(/)0 0(/)0 0(/)0
e
e W
w l-
I- Z
w ...... Z - ... ::l'" ...
Q. GlQ)Q) ::l.&:. .&:. O.&:. .&:.
> ~ ~ ~ o.S!' .S!' ~.S!' .S!'
I- 000 Q) Q) -= Q) Q)
cc Q.Q.Q.:t ~ ~ cc ~ ~
W GiGiGi cc 01- 01'" W 01 01
~ GlQ)Q) W c:Q) c:Q) ~ c: c:
~ .&:..&:..&:. ~ '+-~ '+-~ ~'+- "+-
~ ct ;t;t;t ~ IDg cag ct ID IDQ)
& cc > > > ct ~ ~ Q; ~ cc ~ Gl ~ .!:!
Gl U ;: ;:;: a:: Q. iii Q. iii U Q. N Q. III
- - ...... U 0 E 0 E I 0 'iij 0 ~
ID W Q)Q)Q) E E E E
U cc eee I C5 C5 W t) ~
W EEE cc :Je :Je 0 :J~ :J:J
N wEE:z: Eu E~
o :J:J:J e .- ... .- ... :ll:: .-:J .-
e E E E _ .5 E .5 E U .5 ~ .5 iii
~ '2 '2'2 .... E ~ E N ct E iii E .5
~ .- .-.- 9 ,... - ,... - CD ,... e ,... E
::l E E E 'oJ ~ 'oJ ~ 'oJ .- 'oJ
CD >>> e ~N ~M ~ ~ E ~ g
cc ;>;>;> Z 0 I 0 I ~ 8 g S(...
o ~~~ w o~ ON ::l 0 E
I- ogo I- ~M q;:: ct ~"'E -Ln
U ~ ~Z M ~ a: ~ o.
~ ~~ 0 ~~ NN e N~ ~~
cc. >
~NM ~ ~ N :z: ~ N
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B182
RES #E58/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Hydro Electric Servicing
Award of contract to reconstruct the main hydro-electric service pole line within the Don Valley Brick
Works Site, in the Borough of East York.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT East York Hydro be awarded the contract to reconstruct the main service line with high voltage
overhead cables within the Don Valley Brick Works Site, and install services to other areas of the site
for the amount of $71,690.00 (including G.S.T.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
An overhead high voltage line at 27.6kV 3 phase exists on Bayview Avenue with an overhead feeder
line onto the property, The existing overhead feeder that can be reused runs into the site to the second
existing pole. The remainder of the existing feeder must be replaced, including poles. A new feed will
be provided form the second existing pole on the property to a new outdoor switch and transformer
bank which will be located on the north side of the existing Office building - Building No, 1 (see
attached plan). The switches and transformers will be mounted on a pole structure that will also
support switches and transformers added in subsequent phase of the work.
A feed will be provided from the Phase 1 transformer bank into the new electrical room in the existing
Office building. As well, separate feeds will be provided form the main distribution panel overhead to
other buildings on the site that are within the scope of Phase 1 work.
The existing buildings will have security lighting provided around them. Lighting will be energy efficient
HID type on poles and mounted on existing structures. The exterior lighting fixtures will be vandal
resistant. Quarry lighting will consist of a number of luminaries located along the pathways generally
designed to provide security lighting but with some feature lighting included to highlight various
historical and geological features. Lighting will be energy efficient HID type on poles and will be vandal
resistant.
RATIONALE
The main component of East York Hydro's work covers: the reconstruction of the main service pole line
up to the service transformer location; the supply and installation of secondary service cables up to the
service entrance in the electrical room in Building No.3; the termination of high and low voltage cables
at the transformer; and, the removal of the deteriorated existing power pole line. The total cost for this
work is $54,998.00.
In addition, East York Hydro would install poles and overhead circuit wiring for the parking lot and
roadway lighting; install the power distribution feeders from the electrical room in Building No.3 to
Building No.1 and the sewage pumping station. The total cost for this work is $16,692.00.
The main component of the proposed work is the jurisdiction of East York Hydro. The installation of
the secondary services can be done by others, but, in addition to having a competitive quote, staff
believe that East York Hydro would have the appropriate skilled workers and equipment on site for the
erection of poles and installation of overhead wiring when they install the main pole line. Based on this
review, staff recommend East York Hydro be awarded the work to provide both primary and secondary
electrical service to the Don Valley Brick Works Site.
B183 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province .of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Report prepared by: Nick Saccone (ext.301)
For information contact: Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
Date: 96.04.25
Attachment
File: f:\1I11\public\exec\hydro.396
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B184
RES #59/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Elevator Contract
This report advises on the results of elevator quotations received by the Authority as part of Tender
Opening Sub-Committee Report #8196.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT Report #8/96, dated April 19, 1996, on elevator quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT the contract for the supply and installation of an elevator at the Brick Works Site
be awarded to Otis Bevator for the amount of $34,000.00 (excluding GST). ............ CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Don Valley Brick Works was purchased in 1987. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
accepted the site for management under agreement with the Authority in 1989. The site consists of
16.5 hectares in the valley of the Don River, located west of Bayview Avenue in the Borough of East
York. The site contains an assemblage of buildings formerly used by the brick making industry
between 1890 and 1990.
During 1994-95, a number of studies were undertaken to provide the necessary information to refine
the scope of the regeneration work for the consultant team preparing the detailed site plan. These
studies included detailed environmental site assessments; heritage documentation and analysis; artifact
recording; and, brick making processes. The consultant team lead by Oleson Worland Architects
compiled the Master Plan in January of 1996, and have subsequently finalized detailed construction
plans and tender specifications for the various aspects of the restoration work required at the site.
With respect to the elevator supply and installation of an elevator in Building No.1, Oleson Worland
Architects and Vanbots Construction Group, the project construction manager, prequalified contractors
experienced in the this type of work. Based on this prequalificaiton the following companies were
asked to submit bids:
Dover Elevator
Federal Elevator
Montgomery Kone Elevator
Northern Elevator
Otis Elevator
Schindler Elevator.
All of the firms with the exception of Federal Elevator and Montgomery Kone submitted bids. Federal
Elevator declined due to scheduling difficulties. The results of Tender Opening Sub-Committee #8/96
are:
Contractor Bid
Dover Elevator $ 38,800.00
Federal Elevator Declined
Montgomery Kone Elevator Declined
Northern Elevator $ 36,300.00
Otis Elevator $ 34,000.00
Schindler Elevator $ 39,842.00.
B185 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RATIONALE
Staff recommend that Otis Elevator be awarded the contract to supply and install an elevator at the
Don Valley Brick Works, based on the fact that they were the low bidder and have met all of the
requirements of the tender process.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Report prepared by: Nick Saccone (ext.301)
For information contact: Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
Date: 96.04.25
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B186
RES #E60/96 - BRUCE'S Mill CONSERVATION AREA
Painting Exterior of the Historic Mill, Tender FOD96-17
Awarding contract for painting the exterior of the Historic Mill at Bruce's Mill Conservation Area,
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT the quotation received from Artistic Design Decorators Ltd., in the total amount of $14,800 be
accepted. ............................................................ CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The condition of the painted exterior of the Mill has deteriorated dramatically in the passed few years.
The Mill is a significant Area feature viewed by thousands of visitors each year. It is important that the
Authority maintain and preserve the attractiveness of this historic building for Area visitors as well as
those who contributed financial support through the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto. The
exterior of the building was painted in 1992. However, it has not weathered and requires a new finish
to improve its appearance.
A total of five (5) Quotations were received from four (4) companies to repaint the exterior surface.
The tenders for FOD96-17 are as follows:
C':nmpany Ountatinn Warranty
Artistic Design Decorators Ltd. $ 7,500.00 5 years
Artistic Design Decorators Ltd. $14,800.00 1 0 years
L. Benn Painting & Decorating $14,410.76 5 years
CoverTech Painting Systems Inc. $16,692.00 1
year
Randy's Painting Contractors $69,015.00 2 years
Staff has requested that the contract be completed by June 21, 1996 to be ready for the main summer
season, Work must proceed by the first of June in order to meet the completion date.
RATIONALE
The recommended Quotation received from Artistic Design Decorators Ltd. in the amount of
$14,800.00 includes removal of all existing paint, scrubbing of the wood surface to remove mould,
neutralizing the bare wood, the application of an oil based stain and a 1 O-year warranty. The
recommended stain also includes a fungicide and UV protection yo reduce discolouring. Although this
price is higher initially, stain penetrates bare wood better and repels moisture better than paint. If any
touch up is required, it is far easier to restain that repaint and therefore less costly in the long term.
The other quotations represent scraping and sanding to remove existing loose or peeling paint, and the
application of primer and latex paints, This method was used in 1992. However, it did not last, it is
therefore recommended that all existing paint be removed. Artistic Design was contracted to do the
painting of the Bolton House and Roblins Mill at Black Creek Pioneer Village in 1994. Both these
buildings show no sign of weathering or deterioration after this period. The company has also
contacted staff at the Village on a number of occasions as a follow up to ensure satisfaction,
B187 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for this project are available through the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto, from the
Bruce's Mill - Mill Restoration Fund.
Report prepared by: AI Leach, Extension 251
Date: May 8, 1996
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B188
RES #E61/96 - REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP
WATERFRONT PARK
Seahorse Motor Hotel Umited and Coney Island Motel Limited
Amended basis for acquisition of riparian rights and resolution of property boundary issues relating to
the Seahorse Motor Hotel Limited and Coney Island Motel Limited property located on the south side of
Lakeshore Boulevard West under the "Revised Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park".
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the riparian rights be acquired from Seahorse
Motor Hotel Umited and Coney Island Motel Umited properties, being part of lots 25. 26 and 27. and
part of Lakeshore Road. Registered Plan 1176 and part of Water Lot patented to A. M. Patterson, (CLS
56868), City of Etobicoke, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, illustrated as Parcel A. on the
attached sketch. containing 0.6726 hectares. (1.662 acres). more or less, on the basis as set out
below:
(1) The Authority is to convey and release all right, title and interest in Parcel C on the
appended sketch, containing 0.17 hectares, (0.43 acres). more or less, except for
riparian rights for the nominal consideration of $2.00;
(2) The Authority agrees not to dispute Seahorse Motor Hotel Umited and Coney Island
Motel Umited's title to Parcel B. on the appended sketch, containing 0.1387 hectares,
(0.343 acres), more or less. and the Authority shall transfer. sell and quit claim all and
any right. title and interest it may have in Parcel B, except riparian rights, for the
nominal consideration of $2.00;
(3) Seahorse Motor Hotel Umited and Coney Island Motel Umited shall transfer, sell and
quit claim. any and all of its right, title and interest, including riparian rights to all crown
land in front of parcels A, Band C. on the appended sketch. for the nominal
consideration of $2.00;
(4) The Seahorse Motor Hotel Umited and Coney Island Motel Umited be granted a licence
for access to their loading dock area over Parcel E on the appended sketch. until such
time as the land is required for road purposes by the City of Etobicoke.
(5) The Authority is to pay the vendors' costs in connection with the completion of this
transaction;
(6) Completion of this transaction is subject to obtaining the approval of the Province of
Ontario;
THAT The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the City of Etobicoke be so advised.
THAT Gardiner. Roberts. Barristers and Solicitors. be instructed to complete this transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax.
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
THAT Resolution #A 130/94. adopted at Authority meeting #5/94, held on June 24. 1994, be
rescinded.
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required. and obtain any additional approvals required. ......... CARRIED
B189 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
BACKGROUND
Authority Resolution #A 130/94, adopted by the Members of the Authority at meeting #5194, held on
June 24, 1994, read as follows:
THA T the riparian rights be acquired from Seahorse Motor Hotel Limited and Coney
Island Motel Limited properties, being part of lots 25, 26 and 27, and part of Lakeshore
Road, Registered Plan 1176 and part of Water Lot patented to A. M. Patterson, (CLS
56868), City of Etobicoke, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, illustrated as
Parcel A, Appendix EX. 12/94, containing 0.6726 hectares, (1.662 acres), more or less,
on the basis as set out below:
(1) The Authority is to convey and release all right, title and interest in
Parcel C, Appendix EX. 12/94, containing 0.1500 hectares, (0.371
acres), more or less, except for riparian rights for the nominal
consideration of $2.00;
(2) The Authority agrees not to dispute Seahorse Motor Hotel Limited and
Coney Island Motel Limited's title to Parcel B, Appendix EX. 12/94,
containing 0.1387 hectares, (0.343 acres), more or less, and the
Authority shall transfer, sell and quit claim all and any right, title and
interest it may have in Parcel B, except riparian rights, for the nominal
consideration of $2.00;
(3) Seahorse Motor Hotel Limited and Coney Island Motel Limited shall
transfer, sell and quit claim, any and all of its right, title and interest,
including riparian rights to all crown land in front of parcels A, Band C,
Appendix EX. 12/94, for the nominal consideration of $2.00;
(4) THA T the Authority has no objection to Seahorse Motor Hotel Limited
and Coney Island Motel Limited being entitled to density rights, being
accrued or attached to Parcels A, B, and C, Appendix EX. 12/94, based
on a calculation of density at a rate of 165 units per hectare (67 units
per acre) and in accordance with the City of Etobicoke 's Motel Strip
Secondary Plan and the proposed implementing zoning by-law.
(5) The Authority is to pay the vendors' costs in connection with the
completion of this transaction;
(6) Completion of this transaction is subject to obtaining the approval of
the Province of Ontario;
THA T The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the City of Etobicoke be so
advised.
THA T Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete this
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B190
AND FURTHER THA T the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required, and obtain any additional approvals
required.
Since the adoption of Resolution #A 130/94, as the Members are aware, protracted negotiations have
continued on the Motel Strip.
On February 28, 1996 the O.M.B. decision approving the Zoning by-law for the Motel Strip was handed
down, substantially in the form approved by the City of Etobicoke. Upon receipt of this favourable
decision the Authority registered the Expropriation Plans. Subsequently the owners of Proudfoot Motels
Limited requested Leave to Appeal the decision of the a.M.B. on a matter of law. The Divisional Court
has now scheduled this matter to be heard on May 28/96.
The commencement of construction of the public amenity area is scheduled to begin during June 1 996
to ensure the necessary filling for the land base is completed by the Authority in 1996 to allow the City
of Etobicoke to undertake the servicing and road construction in 1997, being carried out under the
FederallProvincial infrastructure program.
Prior to commencing construction all existing agreements with owners must be completed or be in an
unconditional form to ensure they can close. Completion of the original Seahorse Motor Hotel Limited
and Coney Island Motel Limited transaction required approval of a By-Law providing for 158 residential
units and no subject to any further appeal.
During the original negotiations in 1994, the road connection from Waterfront Drive to Lakeshore
Boulevard in this area was located on the Cruise Motel property situated immediately to the east of the
subject property and cut through the back third of one of the operating motels on the subject property.
At that time, in consultation with the City of Etobicoke, it was agreed that the Authority would only
deal with the land requirements for the public amenity area and Waterfront Drive. Etobicoke was to
acquire the land necessary for the connection road from Waterfront Drive to the Lakeshore Boulevard
when the Seahorse Motor Hotel Limited and Coney Island Motel Limited property was redeveloped.
During the O.M.B. hearing the Secondary Plan and the By-Law were amended to move the connection
road east and it now only impacts a small corner of the crown lands to be conveyed to Seahorse Motor
Hotel Limited and Coney Island Motel Limited property under the original transaction. In order to
facilitate the closing of other Authority land transactions, without the by-law being fully approved, it is
essential that the deletion of this small fragment be accomplished at this time.
The owners of Seahorse Motor Hotel Limited and Coney Island Motel Limited property have agreed that
they will waive the condition relating to By-Law approval and agree to re-configure the parcel being
conveyed to them to accommodate the fragment required for the road connection on the basis of the
crown land being conveyed to them being increased from 0.1500 hectares (0.371 acres) to 0.17
hectares (0.43 acres).
A portion of this existing access to one of the motels on the subject property is across the fragment
being deleted from the approved transaction. In order to allow the owners to utilize this access until
the new road is constructed at some future date, they have requested that this modified arrangement
allow them temporary access across the area shown as parcel E on the attached sketch until such time
as the connection road is constructed.
B191 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RATIONALE
The Authority under this transaction is acquiring riparian rights on Lake Ontario across approximately
275 linear feet. The completion of this transaction which includes resolution of private, crown land
and property boundary issues allows the Authority to obtain title to the crown land in front of this
private property to meet the public amenity objectives of this project.
FUNDING DETAILS
Funding for this project is available under Account Number 208-40-512, Etobicoke Motel Strip.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, Ext. #223
For further information contact: Don Prince, Ext. #221
Mike Fenning, Ext. #223
-.-
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10,1996 B192
~KETCH
...........
SEAHORSE MOTOR HOTE. UMITEO
and CONEY ISLAND MOTE. UMITEO
3\RlCl ~'1h\ lJJSOdOijd ,
~ .I i '~ -
- / \
i
u
'"
~
(.)
~ ,~I [I]
(.) ,I i
a: - I
-<. ~-
C1. ~ ~
~ ~
~ '4
I ,-
I !
.: c:c:~ 2-- :\!.
'r. ,..:'j
.. .c :p ~
I 0 ~ ' D
I ~ ... -
I -
~~ ~}
1.1' .. .
~ ~ "'G
~ .
~ -
~
"~
::
~ ..
;! ;'! i
= .-
Ie . .
r--..~ !I
I ~ . ~
5, I z..... ~ .
v~ .. . ...:1 . ~ -
.::l WI .::, 0:: ~ ~ -
L1J .1 .! u .. ::
0:: ..~ x!l .:J ~ !::
W N rr Ii 'il at L.J rl 11 ..
1- . t; O::!t .. ? :\
'!1 II' i 1::, L'J", -.' C'f I ~
.........[;3 i' ~: \4 .. a: : "
:r-.......J~ ", '- _,
.4. U
- n! ~ ';; ~ ~ !
~ '__ :..0 ~ LIJ I I
I ^ Ii '- ! .
... -. .J -i if, 'I I
~- - ~
~ t: . .
.............. ;j ~ ! i ~
............... · r
~ I . I :
, N -
I ~
'-
C
.J
. ~
-
. --
':S:;:I' --..'r'"
., I~~......... """
w':' .:.-:r,.... .....
~ ~... .",~
" _____ .......~J;...~,
..--J \ ," ';"~.7": -
B193 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RES #E62/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the period of May 10, 1996 to
May 9, 1998 for the applications which are listed below
(A) r.ArmAn v FAArn
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 19, Block 4, Registered Plan Bol-7, (32 Hickman St"
Bolton), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 3.0 metre by 5.5 metre storage shed within the Regional Storm flood
plain of the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by the applicant; received April 4, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpnl':AI:
The applicant wishes to construct a detached storage shed in the backyard area of the property. The
entire property is located within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River and the proposed
building is located within the Bolton Special Policy Area (SPA). No fill placement is proposed as part of
the works.
r.nntrnl nf Flnnrljng'
The proposed storage shed will be wet floodproofed to the Regional Storm flood level, in accordance
with the Bolton SPA policies and development criteria.
Pnllutinn'
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works. The site is located 250 metres from the
Humber River.
r.nnl':ArvAtinn nf I Anrl'
The lands are located on the valley floor, away from any valley slopes in the vicinity.
Pnlir.y GuirlAlinAl':'
The proposal is in compliance with the Bolton SPA (Caledon Official Plan Amendment #57) and Section
4.2.1 - Development in Established Communities - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program
CFN: 27906 Appl.#:063/96/CAL
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.04.23.
(8) SAntA Anrl AntinnAttA Rnttnni
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 14, Concession 8 , (10776 McVean Drive), in the
City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B194
The purpose is to regrade in a regulated area of a tributary of the West Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by R.S. Lackey; Drawing SK01 and Cross Sections AA, BB, CC, and
DD; dated March 23, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~l:
To regrade in a Fill Regulated Area and flood plain of a tributary of the West Humber River. The
property is located on a tableland site with stream corridors to the north and west. Minor regrading is
proposed in order to allow the proponent to maintain the grassed portion of his lot more easily. A
locally oversteepened section of slope to the west of the residence will be regraded. This regrading
will stabilize the existing slope and bring the grades into alignment with those of adjacent properties,
C':nntrnl nf Flnnding'
An area to the north of the existing residence is located within the flood plain. Grade change in this
area will be less then 0.3 metres and will be balanced with a similar cut in an adjacent area, Staff are
satisfied that this grading will not affect the control of flooding. No new fill will be imported to the
site.
Pnlllltinn'
All regraded areas will be seeded upon completion of the grading works
Pnlicy r,lIidp.linA~'
The proposal is in conformance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program,
Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - Existing Development.
CFN: 27905 Appl. #:062/96/BRAM
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.04.22.
(l.) .I111iH Ann KHpitHn
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 5, Registered Plan
M-1114, (60 Pine Ridge Avenue, Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as
located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material for minor lot grading and to construct a single family dwelling
within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the East Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan and Elevation Drawings; prepared by Jardin Design Group Umited; Project 96-
6; dated March 1996; received April 10, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~l:
The proposal consists of placing fill for minor lot grading and constructing a single family dwelling. The
B195 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
property is located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River,
(East Branch) and within the Woodbridge Special Policy Area (SPA).
Cnntrol nf Flnnding'
The perimeter of the building envelope is subject to minimal flood depths under Regional Storm
conditions. Grading to meet Building Code requirements will have the effect of floodproofing the
structure to above the level of the Regional Storm, which is in accordance with the requirements of the
Woodbridge SPA.
Pnlllltinn'
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works,
Cnn~Arvatinn nf I and'
The filled and disturbed areas around the building foundation will be topsoiled and sodded following
construction.
Pnli~y (';llidAlinA~'
The proposal is in compliance with the Woodbridge SPA (Vaughan Official Plan Amendment 440) and
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section 4.2.1 - Development in
Established Communities.
CFN: 27917 Appl.#:067 196N AUG
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.04.23.
(D) Natinnal (';nlf CIIII-I nf Canada
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15, Concession 6, (134 Clubhouse Road,
Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to alter a waterway by constructing erosion control works at three sites within the golf
course, along a tributary stream of the Humber River,
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit
(1) Plans; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather Limited; Project 95320; Figure 4 dated
February 1996, received February22, 1996; Drawing 1, Revision 2 dated April 1996,
received April 25, 1996; Figure 3 dated February 1996, received April 30, 1996;
Drawing 2, Revision 1 dated April 1996, received April 30, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al:
The proposal consists of repairing three streambank erosion sites through the golf course. Two of the
sites are located along existing fairways, while the third is presently undermining the footings of a
pedestrian bridge. The erosion protection works will consist of re-establishing the eroded areas with a
combination of 500 millimetre diameter Class II rip-rap and 3 to 5 tonne armourstone. This portion of
the Humber River tributary is presently not Fill Regulated; however, fill lines are proposed for this
section of the stream, as part of the on-going Fill Regulation Extension Program. The watercourse
drains an upstream area of greater than 125 hectares at this location.
Cnntrol nf Flnnding'
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10,1996 B196
The erosion protection works will maintain the existing configuration and hydraulic capacity of the
stream channel. All areas adjacent to the restored streambanks will be maintained at pre-development
ground elevations.
Pnllutinn'
The erosion sites will be isolated by installing impervious coffer dams (ie. 200 to 300 millimetre rip-rap
wrapped with filter cloth and polyethylene material) upstream and downstream of each site, with
streamflow pumped around the work zones. Construction will occur under dewatered conditions.
Cnn~Arvatinn nf I and'
The disturbed portions of each riparian zone will be planted with native, woody vegetation. The
adjacent fairway areas will be maintained as grass sod.
Pnlir.y (.;llitiAlinA~'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (H) - Existing Resource-based Uses - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27814 Appl.#:036/96N AUG
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.04.22.
(F) 5\aint (.;Armain Fnuntiatinn nf Tnrnntn
To place fill in a Fill Regulated Area on Part Lot 26, Concession 1, (234 Steeles Avenue E.), in the
Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to fill in an old shed foundation at the edge of the top of the valley slope.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan, St. Germain Foundation, showing location of filling; from I.L. Guidolin &
Associates; Drawing SP-1; prepared by applicant; received March 19, 1996.
(2) Landscape Plan, St. Germain Foundation, showing proposed planting at site of fill;
prepared by applicant; received April 9, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al:
A 3 m x 3 m foundation of an old shed was filled to match the elevation of the adjacent grades to
eliminate a safety hazard. The foundation and associated filling extends over the top of bank. The
slope is approximately 6 metres high, steep and well vegetated with mature vegetation. The works are
in a Fill Regulated Area. A notice of violation was issued and this application was made as a result,
Cnntrnl nf Flnntiing'
The works are not located in the flood plain.
Pnllutinn'
There is no risk of pollution caused by this work.
Cnn~Arvatinn nf I anti.
To prevent an erosion hazard, the area is to be stabilized in the spring with seed and planted with
appropriate woody vegetation. There are no geotechnical concerns.
8197 May 10,1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
Pnlicy C::llinAlinA!':'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.2.2 (E), Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures.
CFN: 27885 Appl.#:052/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.04.22.
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 8198
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS ARE ERRATA ITEMS:
Staff's recommendation for approval is based upon the review and acceptance of additional information
from the applicant. The applicant has been informed that the information outstanding must be reviewed
and accepted by staff prior to the Executive Committee Meeting. Staff will advise that this application be
withdrawn from the Executive Committee Aoenda should this information remain outstandino.
(F) Frank 5;chmint ERRATA
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 8, Concession 6, (Concession Road 7, north of King Road), in
the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct three driveway crossings on two tributaries of the Humber River in order to
access an existing lot.
The documents and plans which will form part of this permit will be listed in a separate report.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':al:
The applicant proposes to construct three driveway crossings across two tributaries of the Humber
River to access the 45 hectare property. The crossings will allow for access to the site of a proposed
residence. Three crossings are required as the tributaries traverse the property several times. The
works consist of the placement of a single box culvert at each of the tributary crossings.
In 1990 the MTRCA's Executive Committee issued a permit (C-90021) to construct crossings at two of
the same locations on the subject property. The property ownership has changed and a new permit is
required by the current owner to conduct the works.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The applicant is proposing to place large box culverts (1.3 x 1.0 metres) to ensure that there will be no
flooding caused by the proposed crossings. MTRCA Engineering staff have reviewed the design and
size and are satisfied that there will be no impact on the control of flooding as these culverts are
greater than 70% of the existing bankfull width of the tributaries. The culverts are also larger than
existing culverts downstream of the subject site.
Pnlllltinn'
Sediment fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the construction site. The applicant will conduct
all crossings in the dry by dewatering and pumping around the work locations.
Cnn!':Arvatinn nf I ann'
All disturbed areas adjacent to the proposed watercourse crossings will be renaturalized in accordance
with details provided by the applicant.
Pnlicy C::llinAlinA!':'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27827 Appl.#:040/96/KING
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.04.22.
8199 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
(C::) Ivan Wahl ERRATA
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 13 and Lots 14, 15, 16 and 17, Registered Plan M-
494, (3 Sussex Drive), in the City of Etobicoke, Lake Ontario Waterfront as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material as part of the construction of a new shoreline break wall, within the
Fill Regulated Area of the Lake Ontario Waterfront.
The documents and plans which will form part of this permit will be listed in a separate report.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!~al:
The applicant proposes to construct a new break wall along the shoreline portion of the property. The
proposed break wall will be comprised of 3 to 5 tonne armourstone stacked in a step pattern, five
boulders high. The centre area of the new wall will contain two levels of a semicircular platform
(paved concrete and patio stone) extending leeward approximately 3.0 metres from the remainder of
the structure. Staff have recommended a minor design modification so that no part of the break wall
will extend into the waters of Lake Ontario. This change will ensure maintenance of existing fisheries
habitat. The top of the wall will match the level of the rear yard of the property.
One end of the proposed wall will tie into an existing sea wall on the neighbouring property to the
west, while the other side of the structure will stop short of the property immediately to the east. The
owner's solicitor (Mr. Ron Kanter) is presently pursuing written consents from all landowners affected
by the proposed works.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The 100 year flood elevation for Lake Ontario (excluding wave uprush) is 75.8 metres above sea level
(a.s.!.). The top of the proposed shoreline break wall will be at 79.75 metres a.s.1. Staff are satisfied
that the new shoreline wall will provide the required protection against the Lake Ontario 100 year flood
level with wave uprush.
Pnlllltinn'
The bottom course of armourstone will act as a sedimentation barrier during construction.
Cnn!':Arvatinn nf I ann'
Staff has reviewed the proposed wall design which is in accordance with the technical guidelines under
the Provincial Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River Provincial Shoreline Policy Statement. The owner's
coastal engineer is presently preparing a further analysis to satisfy staff's concerns regarding long-term
stability of the wall and any potential affects on adjacent properties resulting from the new shoreline
structure. It is anticipated that the proposed shoreline break wall will be founded on bedrock and will
provide the necessary protection against erosion hazards and wave uprush. In addition, there is
adequate access to the shoreline through this property for future maintenance purposes, if required.
Pnlicy C::llinRlinR!':'
The proposal is in compliance with the Provincial Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River Shoreline Policy
Statement administered by the MTRCA and is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property
Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
CFN: 27904 Appl.#:061/96/ET08
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.04.22.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B200
(H) T nwn nf Richmnnn Hill ERRATA
To construct in a flood plain on the northwest and southwest corners of Trench Street and Mill
Street, (Mill Pond Park), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a gazebolstage and washroom facility in the Regional Storm flood plain.
The documents and plans which will form part of this permit will be listed in a separate report.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':al:
The Town of Richmond Hill is proposing to construct a gazebolstage on the north side of Mill Street
approximately 10m from the Mill Pond. A washroom facility is also proposed on the south side of Mill
Street at the site of a previously demolished structure and adjacent to an existing parking lot. The
proposed washroom facility will be approximately 27m from the watercourse. Both sites are in the
Regional Storm flood plain in the Mill Pond Park.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The gazebolstage will be subject to 0.5 to 1 metres of flooding under Regional Storm conditions and is
outside of the 100 year flood plain and the hydraulic floodway. The depth of flooding and velocities of
flow at the site of the washroom facility under Regional Storm conditions are approximately 0.3m. and
0.5 mlsec respectively, and result from a spill over Mill Street. This site is also not within the 100 year
flood plain or the hydraulic floodway. All electrical services for these structures are to be located
above the Regional Storm flood levels.
Pnlllltinn'
Sediment fencing will be located between the sites and the pond or watercourse to control sediments
and restrict equipment.
Cnn!':Arvatinn nf I ann'
The site of the washroom facility, is approximately 5 m from the edge of a stable slope. The slope
forms the edge of the channel downstream from the pond dam. The structure will not impact on the
stability of the slope. The lands are currently used as a Municipal park. There are no other significant
resources at these sites.
Pnlicy C::llinAlinR!':'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.2.2 (H) - Existing Resource-based Uses.
CFN: 27926 Appl.#:071/96/RH
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (Ext. 306)
Date: 1996.04.22.
(I) ThR nnnalna C::nlf Clllb ERRATA
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on Part Lot 10, Concession 3 EYS,
(12 Bushbury Lane), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to regrade works in the flood plain and regulated area of the Don River and to construct
three new bridges in order to facilitate the redesign of the existing golf course.
B201 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
The documents and plans which will form part of this permit will be listed in a separate report.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':Al:
To regrade eleven of the existing holes and construct three bridges in order to complete a redesign of
the existing golf course. This work represents the last stage of the club's master plan adopted in
1993. Nine of the holes are located within the regulated area of the Don River valley. Two of the
holes are adjacent to the valley and partially within the regulated area. Specifically, the works subject
to this application are as follows:
Hole #1
- construct three new tee decks and enlarge existing tees
- construct new target bunkers adjacent to green
- recontour existing green and modify location slightly (move further from the watercourse)
Hole #2
- construct new back tee on the east side of the river
- construct new bridge immediately north of York Mills Road in order to access new tee (and
new #4 tee - see below)
Hole #3
- construct new forward tee
- improve drainage on fairway through installation of subdrain
- reconfigure green
Hole #4
- construct new back tee on east side of the river immediately south of York Mills Road
Hole #6
- relocate existing wood footbridge
- construct new bridge to provide access to #6 green and #7 tee
- construct new bunker on #6 green approach (west side of river)
- expand size of existing green in same area
Hole #7
- construct new tees
- construct new bunkers adjacent to the green
- reconfigure existing green
Hole #8
- construct new tees
- construct new green to the east of the existing green
Hole #12
- expand existing tee
- relocate existing greenside bunkers
Hole #13
- expand existing tee
- construct new green south of existing green
- construct new bunkers adjacent to green
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B202
Hole #14
- construct new green immediately east of existing green
- construct new bunkers in front of green
Hole #15
- construct new tees
The bridges will be designed with their abutments set back from the low-flow channel of the river.
They can be constructed without placement of fill for the abutments as adjacent grades are suitable.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The proposal involves regrading within the flood plain, particularly at the south end of the course in
order to improve drainage of the new green sites. Staff have worked with the consultant in order to
achieve no net importation of fill into the Regional Storm flood plain. This is being done by balancing
the amount of cut and fill required on a local basis - the fill required to raise a green site is being
provided by the cut in the adjacent bunker construction. This also makes the work more economical as
the contractor is not required to move material large distances. The proponent has revised the hydraulic
model for the area and on a reach basis there is no impact on the control of flooding.
Pnlllltinn'
No works are required directly in the watercourse. Silt fencing will be installed where regrading is
proposed in proximity to the watercourse.
Cnn!,:p.rvatinn nf I ann'
As part of the redesign proposal, the club is undertaking extensive valleyland regeneration plantings
throughout the reach of the Don River. Efforts have been made to establish native riparian plantings
adjacent to the river in all areas not in play. Efforts have also been made to establish unmaintained
zones adjacent to the existing channel in areas where the fairways cross the watercourse..
Pnlicy C::llinRlinp.!,:'
The proposed works are in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor management
Program, Section 4.2.2(F) - Existing resource based uses. Due to the concern of the local residents
with an earlier proposal by the club, the club has held an information session, at which area residents
and Authority staff were in attendance. Staff have also advised the area residents of receipt of this
application. To date no concerns have been raised by area residents with the proposed changes.
This item is being forwarded as an errata item as the consultant is currently revising some grading and
bridge design details. The drawing list for approval will be finalized subject to receipt and acceptance
of these details by staff prior to May 8th.
CFN: 27854 Appl. #:043/96/NY
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.04.22.
(.I) C::inAttA ann C::Araln Harq'lail ERRATA
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 25, Registered Plan M-537, (34 York Ridge Road), in
the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, and adjacent
landscaping within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River.
The documents and plans which will form part of this permit will be listed in a separate report.
B203 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':al:
The proposal consists of placing fill, as part of the construction of an in-ground swimming pool and
minor landscaping around the pool deck. The site is located partially within the Fill Regulated Area.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The works are not located within the flood plain.
Pnlllltinn'
Silt fencing will be installed to control the overland migration of sediment during construction.
Cnn!':Arvatinn nf I ann'
All development will occur on tableland. The closest part of the construction will occur 10 metres from
the top of bank of a remnant ravine valley of the West Don River watershed. The ravine is well
vegetated, with no visible signs of erosion.
Pnlicy C::llinAlinR!':'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27816 Appl.#:037/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.04.22. .
(K) RAginnal Mllnicipality nf Ynrk ERRATA
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 19 and 20, Concessions 8 and 9, (9th Line south of Major
Mackenzie Drive), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to replace an existing box culvert.
The documents and plans which will form part of this permit will be listed in a separate report.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':al:
In 1994, the Region of York raised the grade of the 9th Line through the flood plain of the Little Rouge
River which resulted in increases in upstream flood elevations. A permit was issued following the work
and included an undertaking from the Region which stated that:
all the affected landowners be notified of the flooding increase; and,
the Region undertake remedial flood reduction measures when the culvert under the 9th Line was
replaced.
This application is now being made to replace the culvert.
The existing bridge is approximately 6.5 m wide and 2.7 m high. The new structure is proposed to be
25 m wide and 3.9 m high. A temporary culvert will be placed in the watercourse up stream of the
bridge to allow traffic to cross during the period of construction.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10, 1996 B204
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The increase in the size of the opening has resulted in a reduction of the flood elevations to those prior
to the raising of the road grade. There is a history of ice jamming at this site and the new opening will
also help to alleviate this problem.
Pnlllltinn'
The abutments and footings will be constructed while the existing bridge is in place. The bridge will
then be removed and the new decking installed. Sediment fencing and silt traps will be installed to
prevent sediment from entering the watercourse from surface flows. These practices will minimise
sediment in the watercourse.
Cnn!':Arvatinn nf I ann'
The in stream works are to be completed between June 1 5 and September 1 5 to meet fishery
requirements. The invert of the stream is to be lined with river run stone to allow fish passage.
Restoration, including creation of fish habitat and riparian planting will be undertaken.
Pnlicy C::llinRlinA!':'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.3 (Infrastructure and Servicing).
CFN: 27943 Appl.#:074/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (Ext. 304)
Date: 1996.04.26.
(I) Tnwn nf Markham ERRATA
To alter a watercourse on Part Blocks B, C, E, F, and H; Plan 7566; (Fred Varley Drive and Fonthill
Blvd.), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to replace two culverts with bridge structures, one under Fred Varley Drive and one
under Fonthill Boulevard..
The documents and plans which will form part of this permit will be listed in a separate report.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':al:
In 1990, a report was undertaken by R.V. Anderson and Assoc. on behalf of the Town and the
Authority, to look at alternatives to relieve flooding of an existing residential community along a
tributary of Bruce's Creek west of Main St. in Unionville. This work was done as background to the
approval of the Special Policy Area designation in Unionville. The study recommended that the culverts
under Rycroft Ave., Fonthill Blvd. and Fred Varley Drive be enlarged to reduce the limits of the 100
year flood plain for this watercourse.
At this time, the Town is proposing to replace the culverts at Fred Varley Drive and Fonthill Blvd. The
Rycroft culvert will also be replaced in the near future. The culverts will be replaced with a precast
open-foot concrete bridge 10m x 2.4m at Fred Varley Drive and 8.5m x 204m at Fonthill Blvd.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
Flooding by the Regional Storm through this reach of this tributary is caused by a backwater from
Bruce's Creek. Opening of the culverts will not reduce the Regional flood elevation. The existing
B205 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
culverts at Fonthill Blvd. and Fred Varley Drive control the 100 year flood level and result in the
flooding of 19 residential structures under 100 year flood levels. With the opening of the culverts, only
four of the structures will remain flood vulnerable, with a maximum depth of less than 0.5 m. at the
lowest structure.
Pnlllltinn'
The abutments of the new bridge structures will be constructed prior to removal of the existing culvert.
The existing culvert will then be removed, the channel reformed, and the new bridge lifted into place.
This process will minimise sediment suspension during construction. The disturbed areas will be
stabilised immediately following the works.
Cnn!':Arvatinn nf I ann'
The invert of the stream will be lined with riprap for erosion protection and covered with river run stone
for fish habitat. The works will be constructed in May and June and will meet fisheries guidelines
advocated by the Ministry of Natural Resources.
A second phase of work will be the subject of a subsequent permit application and will include the
restoration of the watercourse. This future work will include erosion protection in the channel upstream
of Fonthill Blvd. and riparian planting throughout the reach. The sites of the culvert replacements will
be completely restored at that time.
Pnlicy C::llidAlinA!':'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 5.1.1 (Flood Control Remedial Works).
CFN: 27934 Appl.#:072/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.04.24.
KEY ISSUE
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on
a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules
whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from
some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation
of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Report prepared by: R. Jarrett (Ext. 315)
Date: 1996.04.26.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96, MAY 10,1996 B206
NEW BUSINESS
RES. #63/96 - THE DONALDA CLUB
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT appropriate staff, Councillor King and Chair O'Brien of The Metropolitan
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority have an opportunity to meet with the Board and
representatives of the Donalda Golf Club to discuss the Accord AND to develop a spirit of partnership.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
B207 May 10, 1996, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/96
TERMINA TION
ON MOTION, THE MEETING TERMINATED AT 10:45 a.m., May 10, 1996.
~hard O'Brien J. Craio Mather
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
19mb
~ .-
"the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #4/96 Page B208
June 14, 1996
The Executive Committee met in the Humber Room, 5 Shoreham Drive on Friday, June 14, 1996. The
Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m.
PRESENT
Michael Di Biase ........................................................ Member
Lois Griffin ............................................................ Member
Lois Hancey ................................................. Vice Chair, Authority
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Joan King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard O'Brien. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair, Authority
Richard Whitehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
REGRETS
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
RES #B62A/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/96, held May 31, 1996 be approved. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
B209 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14,1996
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
RES #B63A/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Electrical Servicing Of Buildings
This report advises on the results of the electrical servicing quotations, specific to
the Phase 1 restoration of the buildings complex, received by the Authority as part
of Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #16/96.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Report #16/96, dated May 31, 1996 on buildings
electrical work quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the Phase 1 electrical servicing of the
buildings at the Don Valley Brick Works site to TWR Electric Co. Ltd. for the amount of $370,000
(excluding GST), and subsequent stages not to exceed a total budget of $451,000 (excluding GST).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Don Valley Brick Works was purchased in 1987. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
accepted the site for management under agreement with the Authority in 1989. The site consists of
16.5 hectares in the valley of the Don River, located west of Bayview Avenue in the Borough of East
York. The site contains an assemblage of buildings formerly used by the brick making industry
between 1890 and 1990.
During 1994-95, a number of studies were undertaken to provide the necessary information to refine
the scope of the regeneration work for the consultant team preparing the detailed site plan. These
studies included detailed environmental site assessments; heritage documentation and analysis; artifact
recording; and, brick making processes. The consultant team lead by Oleson Worland Architects
compiled the Master Plan in January of 1996, and have subsequently finalized detailed construction
plans and tender specifications for the various aspects of the restoration work required at the site.
Public input was received at a number of community meetings.
With respect to the Phase 1 electrical servicing of the buildings complex, Oleson Worland Architects
and Vanbots Construction Group, the project construction manager, pre-qualified contractors
experienced in this type of work. Based on this pre-qualification, the following companies were asked
to submit bids:
Ampere Electrical
Bernie Electrical
Dow Electrical
Guild Electric
Plan Electrical
Torwood Electrical
TWR Electric Co. Ltd.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B210
--
The results of Tender Opening Sub-Committee #16/96 are:
Contractor 1M
Ampere Electrical Declined
Bernie Electrical Declined
Dow Electrical $435,450
Guild Electric $427,300
Plan Electrical Declined
Torwood Electrical $433,490
TWR Electric Co Ltd $370,000
Contractors who declined to bid did so due to scheduling difficulties.
RATIONALE
A general review and analysis was conducted with the low bidder, and it was determined that the
scope of their work was complete. In addition, the low bidder met all of the other tender criteria.
To ensure continued control of the project costs, staff recommend the electrical work be awarded
in stages. The first stage will include the electrical work associated with the restoration of
Buildings 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 and 13 (see attached plan). This work will cost $370,000.
Additional electrical work on buildings 12, 14, 15 and 16 will total $81,000. The additional work,
if required, will also be staged and awarded only if expenditures are within the overall project
budget.
Based on this information, staff recommend the award of contract to TWR Electric Co. Ltd., in the
amount of $370,000.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Report Prepared By:
Nick Saccone (ext.301)
For information contact:
Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
B211 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
RES. #B64/96 - DON V ALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Roofing Contract
This report advises on the results of the roofing work quotations received by the
Authority as part of Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #15/96.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Report #15/96, dated May 31,1996, on
roofing work quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the roofing work associated with
the first phase of the Don Valley Brick Works site restoration to Semple Gooder for the amount of
$225,977 (excluding GST). ............................................ CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Don Valley Brick Works was purchased in 1987. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
accepted the site for management under agreement with the Authority in 1989. The site consists
of 16.5 hectares in the valley of the Don River, located west of Bayview Avenue in the Borough of
East York. The site contains an assemblage of buildings formerly used by the brick making industry
between 1890 and 1990.
During 1994-95, a number of studies were undertaken to provide the necessary information to
refine the scope of the regeneration work for the consultant team preparing the detailed site plan.
These studies included detailed environmental site assessments; heritage documentation and
analysis; artifact recording; and, brick making processes. The consultant team lead by Oleson
Worland Architects compiled the Master Plan in January of 1996, and have subsequently finalized
detailed construction plans and tender specifications for the various aspects of the restoration work
required at the site. Public input was received at a number of community meetings.
With respect to the roofing component of the work, Oleson Worland Architects and Vanbots
Construction Group, the project construction manager, pre-qualified contractors experienced in this
type of work. Based on this pre-qualification, the following companies were asked to submit bids:
Bothwell -Accurate Co.
Dean Chandler Roofing
Dominion Roofing
Provincial Industrial Roofing
Peerless Roofing
Semple Gooder
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B212
The results of Tender Opening Sub-Committee #15/96 are:
Contractor ~
Bothwell -Accurate Co. $268,685.00
Dean Chandler Roofing $274,790.00
Dominion Roofing Declined
Provincial Industrial Roofing $238,096.00
Peerless Roofing Declined
Semple Gooder $280,551.00
Contractors who declined to bid did so due to scheduling difficulties.
RATIONALE
A general review and analysis of the bids was conducted. Based on this review it was determined
that Semple Gooder's bid had included for work on Building 12, which had not been requested. By
excluding the work associated with Building 12 Semple Gooder's bid was reduced to $225,977,
thereby making them the low bidder. In addition, Semple Gooder met all of the other tender
criteria.
Based on this information, staff recommend the award of contract to Semple Gooder, in the
amount of $225,997 to complete the roofing work for Buildings 1,3,4,9,10 and 11 (see attached
plan).
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Report prepared by:
Nick Saccone (ext.301)
For information contact:
Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
8213 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
. DON VALLEY B R Ie K WORKS REGENERATION
, 995 MASTER P LA N
EXISTlNG BUILDINGS
PLANT AT DON VAu.EY I
BRICK WORKS. 1994
t O....P'f
LEGENO I I
'-r-n Cl7 I
1 Ofhc. I ,....
-, I
2 Showroom I _; 41 I 9 I I
3 W_ono Sholl I I
4 Sand-Lune Star.;. I
5 Luncruoam I J ;l I ~. 12 I
810 7 Sand-Lune 8nck ~ : I 10 I 11 UI I
, I I
F'Poouctton ! 1151 6-7 1 IJ.JW I
II SencI"Lune 8nck Stor-o. I I II: WJ I
Shed 1 I 2 Ii' I 'Itl"c) I 1
sa Q..,IS"... Star.;. I
10 CIa.,IS"_ GnnolnQ I : I i....J I I
PI...t i I I 16
I I
11 ScreenIng .nd Ou.t I , I
CollectIOn . " - I I
11 IS Stoclc Bnck OP'f.r I I
l1C Fen Room 8 I 15
12 HOldmg Room lJ I
13 Brock SIOr.;. Shed " .
1:]- I
a W....Cut 8nck I I
Proauctton Plent I ! I
15 0,.,-""... 8nck I
F'PoouctlOn Plant I
16 Tunnel I(~n. .nd O,.,.r I I
17 .V -'.... - Ch,mne.. 118 /'
III Oat. Hou.. - -
-
- ..-'
) - --
-
- .,
-
- ~- --- ..lCt' -
-
-- -~ -" f.Il'"
- -
. \ - -
-" .---...
-
-"
-'
- (\Av~...''''
,
...
,
'"
--
.....
.....
..- -- -- -~-----
EXECUTIVE COMM ITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B214
RES #865/96 - REVIT AUZA TION OF THE AUTHORITY'S EMPLOYEE
SUGGESTION AWARDS PROGRAM
To revitalize MTRCA's Employee Suggestion Awards Program.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THE RECOGNITION AND EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AWARDS SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE
AUTHORITY THAT the Employee Suggestion Awards Program be revised and;
THAT the value of Employee Suggestion Awards be increased to 10% of the first year's net savings or
net revenue to a maximum of $2.000 or;
THA T the value of awards that are not related to cost savings or revenue generation but provide added
value to the organization be recognized in the form of MTRCA gift certificates and have a maximum
value of $200;
AND FURTHER THAT employee suggestions be evaluated within three months of receipt by an
employee committee which will make recommendations to the Recognition and Employee Suggestion
Awards Subcommittee on an as required basis. ................................. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Our Employee Suggestion Awards System began in 1970. Since that time the Authority has approved
34 awards, ranging in value from $25 to the maximum of $200. During the history of the program
there have been a number of years in which no suggestions were received, or in which no awards were
recommended. We have not received any Employee Suggestions since July 1994.
There are many reasons for this:
. Traditionally we have used the granting of an award as the time to promote the program.
Because we have not granted an award sll1ce 1992, the program has not been broadly
publicized of late;
. Because of the major economic impacts of 1993, we have focused our efforts more on
revenue generation and have created two new forums to which our employees have been
asked to bring ideas;
. Each work location has been charged with improving their revenue picture and all
employees have been involved in these various exercises;
B215 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
The Employee Suggestion Awards Program encourages employees to put forward ideas that will save
money, make money or improve service. We have been focusing on the "make money" component of
the program. It is now time to revitalize the program with emphasis on the three equally important
components of the original program.
ANALYSIS
There are four areas of the Authority's program which require improvement:
. The maximum award value is comparatively small and has not been increased since 1970,
(see comparative data attached). Increasing the level of the award will make the program
more attractive while adding minimal cost;
. The process is slow with suggestions being evaluated only once a year. Aiming for a three
month processing period will energize the program and provide opportunities throughout the
year to publicize the awards;
. There has been limited employee involvement in the evaluation process so that employees
in general lack an understanding of the program and how decisions are made about the
merits of a suggestion. In the future, the initial evaluation of the suggestions should be
made by an employee committee, representing all sectors of our business (6 employees)
and Ralph Kofler, Coordinator, Budgets and Financial Services is to provide financial
analysis. The employee committee will then make recommendations to the subcommittee
on an "as needed" basis.
. An internal publicity campaign is required to garner understanding and interest in a
revitalized program.
One merit of our current program that must be retained is keeping it simple. We have reviewed a
number of other similar awards systems and were daunted by the complexity and detail of some of
them. Our system and process has been a simple and straightforward one and should remain so. We
were impressed by the City of Mississauga's program. The rules and process are simple and succinctly
explained, the application is uncomplicated and the graphics are simple yet meaningful.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
There are no significant costs. Awards will be paid out of savings or revenue increases; non-savings,
non-revenue awards will be of minimal cost and can be accommodated within the Finance and
Administration DiviSion approved budget.
Report prepared by:
Kaye MacDonald, ext 220
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B216
RES #866/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
Flood Plain Component, Humber River Watershed
1063078 Ontario limited Property
Purchase of property, located south of Rutherford Road, west of Islington Avenue,
in the City of Vaughan, under the "Greenspace Protection And Acquisition Project
1996-2000, Flood Plain and Conservation Component - Humber River Watershed. It
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 2.32 acres, more or less, consisting of an irregular
shaped parcel of vacant land, be purchased from 1063078 Ontario Limited, said land being Part of Lot
15, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, and further described as the whole
of Block 33, Plan 65M-, consisting of land situate south of Rutherford Road, west of Islington Avenue;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00;
THA T the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors. be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A 131/95, Authority Meeting #4/95, May 26, 1995, approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with LlI1da Warth, of H & R Developments, representative of the
owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence
with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
B217 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
RATIONALE
The subject property is part of the valley and flood plain of a major tributary of the Humber River and is
within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
It is proposed to turn over the lands to the City of Vaughan under a management agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004-11-502.
For information contact:
Ron Dewell, Extension 245
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B218
-
OF VAUGHAN
I'" ..
1
O~ .. , - ~~,
\..
... '
I'. ,
"5 ..
,...
It1.
~ ....
-
B219 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
RES #B67/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
, 996-2000
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Carruthers Creek Watershed
620637 Ontario Limited (Blue Maple)
Purchase of property located south of Bayly Street, west of Shoal Point Road, in
the Town of Ajax under the "Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1996-
2000, Flood Plain and Conservation Component - Carruthers Creek Watershed."
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.86 acres, more or less, be purchased from
620637 Ontario Limited, said land being an irregular shaped parcel of land, being Part of Lot 5, Range
3, Broken Front Concession, Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham, consisting of land situate
south of Bayly Street, west of Shoal Point Road;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus an income tax receipt in the amount of
$5,580.00 and the vendors reasonable legal and survey costs;
THA T the Authority receive conveyance of the land required, free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THA T Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors. be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax, legal
costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #131/95, Authority Meetll1g #4/95, May 26, 1995, approving the project.
The Authority at Meeting #2/95, dated March 21, 1995, under Resolution #A46/95, approved the
acquisition of 16.06 acres of flood plain, at the purchase price of $48,180, ($3,000/acre) owned by
6206370 Ontario Limited, adjacent to the subject site.
Negotiations have been conducted with Andrew Paton, O. C., representative of the owner.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence
with the purchase of the property.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B220
RATIONALE
The property is part of the flood plain of Carruthers Creek and part of the Carruthers Creek Forest ESA
(#113) and is located within the Authority's approved Master Plan for Acquisition.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The lands in this area are maintained by Authority forces. The addition of this small parcel which is
contiguous with other Authority lands, will not have any significant impact on maintenance costs.
Taxes on the property are $329.00 per year. It is estimated when the subject parcel is linked to the
other Authority lands that the taxes will be $200.00 per year.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This flood plain land is valued at $3,000.00/acre. The funding of this purchase will be charged to
Account 004-11-502.
For information Contact:
Ron Dewell, Extension 245
8221 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
--... ~ ~........ .- ~-- " ,-- \
---::". '" '\i '--==- 7" .
" , ~ '., -:- \ ,) ""-- <.
- .
~~G' ~
- - ~~ I
'7' -- - '\ '. j
\' .. j
. -, SUBJECT PROPERTY
'.
-
iF ~ .
, (' ~
- r; 'j C
........
II \ }.
~ f.... , 'I- F' \
~. : 4' ,~11 I '-,
t ..
I \ Ii ,
! .'
~ ...
AUTHORITY LAND RECENTL TY 'I - ,
M
ACQUIRED FROM 620637 . 1'.'
ONTARIO LIMITED '" ~
,.J \ I I!
( \ .1 '"
\ . .,
\ , '../
\ , -1_C_
\ I .--
\ . I
.. -
~/' :1
'!Is :'-
j --
- >, " ,
I ) \
f \ ~ (
51;
\ ! .i?\ "- /
\ I 1 .~ '----I':
...- .:.~/-
// . '~' ( . .
II ..(ff'.\ ..
~I;/ .
, .~ I
'ii
I-
., \
i i .
, '/
'I r"ft
/ I>,
~"'..
~ I :
~ _. IIa
;. P :kerr";
'"
- ~ lIageF .-..,-~ .-
'.\ !~ =---
C.~~-r~ tf~ 51 :i
. '
, ~ oJ>:' ~ O. -' :I!
~' ~I '"
.....~ ~ a ~~ .-/ II
;::r- ~ ~ :: ~-/'I
__/ ~! ;. :r _ - =--= -........1
\ - F3l'llC" ~~ ~ ( III: \ \
t ~.n. SQ"'f ~.1 - .." ~-' 111\
a.., _ ~ :.:..,' \ ~ . -- )
\ _ _, \t"'ontqUll"~~8~; ~~- A,IU - --- 1111
~ -___:r:M( ~d t' .. Waterfront
.,.nchm.n'S ~ Rota,y
ty Pa,k
III
-
EXECUTIVE COMM ITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B222
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES #868/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Concrete Forming For Pond Retaining Wall
This report advises on the results of the concrete forming work quotations,
specific to the pond retaining wall construction, received by the Authority as part
of Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #17196.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT Report #17/96, dated May 31, 1996 on concrete forming work quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the concrete forming work to
construct the pond retaining wall at the Don Valley Brick Works site to Chemello Contractors Ltd. for
the amount of $48,960 (excluding GST). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Don Valley Brick Works was purchased in 1987. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
accepted the site for management under agreement with the Authority in 1989. The site consists of
16.5 hectares in the valley of the Don River, located west of Bayview Avenue in the Borough of East
York. The site contains an assemblage of buildings formerly used by the brick making industry
between 1890 and 1990.
During 1994-95, a number of studies were undertaken to provide the necessary information to refine
the scope of the regeneration work for the consultant team preparing the detailed site plan. These
studies included detailed environmental site assessments; heritage documentation and analysis; artifact
recording; and, brick making processes. The consultant team lead by Oleson Worland Architects
compiled the Master Plan in January of 1996, and have subsequently finalized detailed construction
plans and tender specificatIOns for the vanous aspects of the restoration work required at the site.
Public input was received at a number of community meetings.
With respect to the construction of a concrete retaining wall at the south end of the pondlwetland
complex, Oleson Worland Architects and Vanbots Construction Group, the project construction
manager, pre-qualified contractors expenenced in this type of work. Based on this pre-qualification,
the following companies were asked to submit bids:
Chemello Contractors Ltd.
DCC Forming
Deckwall Contractors
Landmark Contracting
Raffa Contracting
B223 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
Bids were received from Chemello Contractors Ltd. and DCC Forming. The others declined to submit
bids due to scheduling difficulties. The results of Tender Opening Sub-Committee #17/96 are:
Cnntrar:tnr Bid
Chemello Contractors Ltd $48,960
DCC Forming $45,312
Deckwall Contractors Declined
Landmark Contracting Declined
Raffa Contracting Declined.
RATIONALE
A general review and analysis was conducted of the two bids received from the pre-qualified
contractors. Based on this review, the low bid was disqualified for not providing the required bid
security. Both bids however, were well below the consultant's estimated budget of $60,591 for this
work.
Based on this information, staff recommend the award of contract to Chemello Contractors Ltd. in the
amount of $48,960.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in Account #113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Report Prepared By:
Nick Saccone (ext.301)
For information contact:
Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B224
RES #869/96 - THE TOWN OF CALEDON OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 114
Authorization for staff to represent Authority interests before the Ontario
Municipal Board Hearing on the referrals to the Town of Caledon Official Plan
Amendment 114 and related consolidated planning documents and land
development applications.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THA T staff be authorized to represent Authority interests before the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing
on the referrals to the Town of Caledon Official Plan Amendment 114 and related consolidated
planning documents and land development applications;
THA T staff continue to pursue the resolution of Authority issues in cooperation with relevant parties
and/or participants prior to the Hearing;
THA T Gardiner, Roberts be retained as legal coullsel, as required;
AND FURTHER THAT the Town of Caledon, the Regional Municipality of Peel and the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs & Housing be so advised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Town of Caledon Official Plan Amendment 114 was adopted by Council in September, 1991.
Following its adoption, the Town became involved in discussions with various Provincial ministries and
agencies related to such matters as residential densities, affordable housing and the consumption of
agricultural lands. These matters were never cOllcluded as they were superseded by a Provincial
directive to accelerate the completion of the Region of Peel's Official Plan. The Ministry of Municipal
Affairs & Housing took the pOSitIOn that the Regional OP should be completed prior to further
processing OPA 114.
In the Spring of 1995, the Bolton North Hill Developers Group made a Judicial Review application for
the purpose of obtaining an order requinng the Mllllster of Municipal Affairs & Housing to refer OPA
114 to the Ontario Municipal Board. As a result of tIlls action, the Town of Caledon OPA 114 was
referred to the Ontario Municipal Board and the Judicial Review application was withdrawn.
At the Preliminary Hearing relating to motions for direction on OPA 114, the Town of Caledon and
Region of Peel took the position that a hearing for OPA 114 should wait for OPA 124 (Part II of the
Town's Official Plan) and the new Region of Peel Official Plan. The Board member decided to schedule
a Pre-Hearing conference for May 16, 1996, in order to hear motions for consolidation related to OPA
114. Authority staff attended and participated in this Pre-Hearing conference and reserved party status
in order to safeguard MTRCA program and policy interests.
B225 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
RATIONALE
Authority staff has been extensively involved in providing information, advice and comments to the
Town of Caledon related to OPA 114 and OPA 124. OPA 114 represents the first phase of the Town's
new Official Plan which establishes an overall strategic direction for the Town of Caledon to the year
2011, concentrating specifically on population and employment, housing, transportation, rural estate
residential and settlement areas, industrial and commercial development. OPA 124 represents the
second phase of the Official Plan consisting of policies related to environmental management and
heritage protection.
Given that OPA 114 was approved by the Town in 1991, it was necessary to update the plan to reflect
local and regional initiatives such as changes in provincial policy which have since occurred. The
majority of MTRCA program and policy interests have now been resolved to the satisfaction of the
Town and Authority staff.
Additionally, Authority staff has been involved on the Provincial Core Team in the review and approval
of the Region of Peel Official Plan. This Plan was recently approved by the Region and is currently
being circulated by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing.
Both the Region of Peel Official Plan and OPA 124 are expected to be consolidated with the Hearing
for OPA 114. The Ontario Municipal Board has requested the Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing
advise whether it would be possible to refer these documents well before the statutory 150 day
deadline period in order to enable the Hearing 0/1 OPA 114 to begin. An actual Ontario Municipal Board
hearing date has not been set as of yet.
In addition to these planning documents, four motions for consolidation were allowed by the Board. It
should be noted that additional motions for consolidation related to other private official plan
amendments referred to the Ontario Municipal Board could be brought forward at the next Pre-Hearing
conference scheduled for July 18, 1996. A status report will be brought forward to the Executive
Committee in advance of the Ontario Municipal Board hearing.
The following is a summary related to the motions for consolidation allowed by the Board related to
OPA 114.
Bolton North Hill: A landowners group have submitted a proposed Bolton North Hill Secondary Plan
under Section 22 of the Planning Act. This plan proposes to expand Bolton to the north to include an
additional 2400 acres of land for residential uses. TillS area is located immediately north of the Bolton
Settlement Area and is bounded by the 15th Side road to the north, Highway 50 to the west, and the
Ninth Line and Albion-Vaughan Road to the east. The request for consolidation includes five site
specific amendments to be considered Within the broader context of the proposed Bolton North Hill
Secondary Plan.
The lands are located within the Cold Creek watershed, and would affect a number of MTRCA program
and policy interests. A portion of the site is also situated within the Oak Ridges Moraine. Technical
reports have been submitted in support of this Pravate Amendment, however based on staff's review
the scope and depth of these reports is limited, and does not fulfil the Authority's requirements related
to proposals of this nature.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B226
P.apRrlinw: InvR!:tmRnt~: This area comprises approximately 280 acres of land located on the west side
of the Bolton settlement area within the Town of Caledon. The area is bounded by King Street to the
north, the CPR line to the west and south, and Station Road to the east. OPA 114 designates these
lands as 'Residential - Policy Area A' in Bolton and requires that a secondary plan be prepared. As the
Town of Caledon was not prepared to consider a secondary plan at this time, a private official plan
amendment consisting of a secondary plan was submitted to have these lands included within the
Bolton settlement area.
The lands are located within the Humber River watershed, and would affect a number of MTRCA
program and policy interests. While the proposed land uses as identified within the proposed
secondary plan appear to generally respect the resource features on site, no reports have been
submitted to support this application.
CalRdnn Nnrlh VRntllrR~: This private official plan amendment is site specific in nature and proposes to
expand the Sandhill settlement area to include approximately 15 acres of land fronting onto Airport
Road for industrial and commercial purposes.
The lands are located within the Humber River watershed; however, it does not appear that they affect
any MTRCA program or policy interests.
Tnwn nf Oran!}BJIiJJE: A motion for mediation was put forward by the Town of Orangeville with respect
to certain lands situated within the Town of Caledon, outside our area of jurisdiction. The motion was
adjourned 'sine die' and does not affect the prouram or policy interests of the MTRCA
CONCLUSION
Based on the rationale and explanation noted above, It is recommended that staff be authorized to
represent Authority interests before the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing on the Town of Caledon
Official Plan Amendment 114 and consolidated planning documents and development applications, and
retain Gardiner, Roberts as legal counsel as reqlJlred. Authority staff should advise the Town of
Caledon, Region of Peel and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing, and continue to pursue the
resolution of issues with the relevant parties. A status report will be brought forward to the Executive
Committee in advance of the Ontano Municipal Board hearing.
Report prepared by:
Luch Ognibene (extension 284)
B227 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14,1996
RES #870/96 - THE CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 400
Authorization for staff to represent Authority interests before the Ontario
Municipal Board Hearing on the referrals to the City of Vaughan Official Plan
Amendment 400.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT staff be authorized to represent Authority interests before the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing
on the referrals to the City of Vaughan Official Plan Amendment 400;
THA T staff continue to pursue the resolution of Authority issues in cooperation with relevant parties
andlor participants prior to the Hearing;
THA T Gardiner, Roberts be retained as legal counsel, as required;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Vaughan, the Rogional Municipality of York and the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs & Housing be so advised. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The City of Vaughan OffiCial Plan Amendment 400 was approved by the Province on June 29, 1995.
Several sections of the Plan were deferred for further consultation and several sections were referred
to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) for resolution. Since that time, Authority staff has been
monitoring the outstanding issues affecting MTRCA interests and has held discussions and meetings
with municipal staff and affected landowners. A referral by landowners directly related to MTRCA
valleyland policies has been resolved subsequent to Authority direction at Meeting #12/95, held
January 26, 1996. A Pre-Hearing Conference hus been scheduled for June 3, 1996, which Authority
staff will attend and participate related to MTRCA interests.
Of the current referrals, a number directly impact MTRCA programs and policies such that party status
will be reserved. These referrals are summarized below.
RATIONALE
Rp.fp.rr;!1 #5: Referral of a portion of the east-west Plimary road in Block 10, together with the
corresponding transportation policies IfIsofar as they apply to the implementation of
that road; and that portion of the north-south primary road in Block 11 which crosses
the ravine system together with the corresponding transportation and environmental
policies insofar as they apply to the implementation of that road. Referred by the
Toronto Waldorf School.
The north-south primary road in Block 11 traverses a tributary of the East Don River and has been
schematically identified on the relevant schedules of OPA 400. Policy provisions within OPA 400
identify the need to address the siting of roads and crossings in the field and by means of the
appropriate technical studies as part of the Block Plan Process. Additionally, a permit would be
required from The Metropolitan Toronto and RegIOn Conservation Authority (MTRCA) pursuant to
Ontario Regulation 158.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 199G B228
Status:
Municipal staff has advised that this referral will most likely be adjourned to be resolved through the
development of the individual Block Plan. Authority staff concur with this approach given that it will
allow for the road alignment and crossing to be reviewed in detail, subject to the environmental and
transportation policies of OPA 400 and the Authority's Valley & Stream Corridor Management Program.
Rp-fArr~1 6: Referral of a parcel of land located in Lots 30 & 31, Concession 2 WYS, north of Teston
Sideroad, between Dufferin Street and Bathurst Street, together with the corresponding
policies related to Landform Conservation and Aggregate Resources. Referred by Rizmi
Holdings Limited, Lucia Milani in Trust and Lucia Milani.
The lands in question are partially located within the McGill Environmentally Significant Area (ESA 73),
within the Oak Ridges Moraine. The lands are designated "Rural Use Area" and are partially identified
as an ESA and ANSI. The landowners object to these designations on the grounds that the lands have
been identified by the Ministry of Natural Resources as having aggregate deposits considered to be a
Sand and Gravel Resource of Primary Significance. Accordingly, the landowners feel the lands should
be designated "Mineral Aggregate Resources Area".
Status:
As noted above, lands related to this referral were adopted as part of the Authority's inventory of
Environmentally Significant Areas at Meetlllg 1112/95, held January 26, 1996. This site is also
designated as an ANSI by the Milllstry of Natural Resources. The significance of this natural area
within the Authority's jurisdiction was confirmed through field investigations; the property in question
contains a large portion of the central part of the McGill ESA and contributes substantially to the
significance of this natural area. In keeping with the Authority's Resolution, staff will continue to
advocate the protection of thiS area through plan input and review activities.
RAfArr~1 7: Referral of a parcel of land located in Lots 28 & 29, Concession 2 WYS, north of Teston
Road, south of the Trans Canada Pipeline, on the east side of Dufferin Street, together with
the corresponding policies. The landowners propose to develop the site as a 17 lot plan of
subdivision which is currently the suoJect of a private official plan amendment (OPA A39J.
Referred by Maple Downs Golf & Country Club Limited.
The lands in question are partially located withlll the McGill Environmentally Significant Area (ESA 73),
within the Oak Ridges Moraine. The lands are designated "Rural Use Area" and are partially identified
as an ESA and ANSI. The landowners have pr eVlously sought approvals for a 17 lot plan of subdivision
which is currently the subject of a private official plan amendment. Previous applications related to
this proposal have been refused by the City of Vaughan and considered premature by the Province in
light of the general expression of Provincial interest in the Oak Ridges Moraine. More recently, the
landowners had applied for an exemption to the Region of York Trees By-law to facilitate a nine hole
expansion to the existing golf course, of which three holes would detrimentally impact the ESA.
Status :
As noted above, the subject lands are partially within the same ESA complex as Referral 6 (McGill ESA
73). Authority staff would therefore propose the same course of action, to continue to advocate the
protection of this area through plan input and review activities.
Bp-fp-rr~1 9: Referral of a parcel of land located IfI Lot 11, Concession 2 WYS, north of Highway 7
between Bathurst Street and Duffelln Street, together with the City's woodlot acquisition
policy as it relates to the subject lands. Referred by Baker Farm.
B229 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14,1996
A portion of the lands in question are located within the Bakers Woods Environmentally Significant
Area (ESA 128). These same lands are within the Parkway Belt West Plan and have been excluded
from OPA 400. The Province has been pursuing the acquisition of these lands through the Ontario
Realty Corporation.
Status:
As noted above, the lands related to this referral were adopted as part of the Authority's inventory of
Environmentally Significant Areas at meeting #2/95, held March 31, 1995. This site is also designated
as an ANSI by the Ministry of Natural Resources. Authority staff will continue to monitor this referral,
however at present no further action is necessary.
RAfArr;J1 12: Referral of a portion of the east-west primary road in Block 10, together with the
corresponding transportation policies insofar as they apply to the implementation of
that road; and the designation of a stream corridor within their lands. Referred by Ner
Israel Yeshiva College.
The east-west primary road in Block 10 does not affect the program or policy issues of the MTRCA.
With respect to the designation of a stream corridor affecting their lands, Authority staff has
undertaken a review of the proposed fill line extension mapping in this area and confirmed that the
designation applies to lands draining In excess of 125 hectares which have an associated flood plain.
Status:
Municipal staff has advised that this referral will most likely be adjourned to be resolved through the
development of the individual Block Plan. Authollty staff concur with this approach given that it will
allow for the delineation of the steam cOrridor, subject to the environmental policies of OPA 400 and
the Authority's Valley & Stream Corridor Manilucrnent Program.
CONCLUSION
Based on the rationale and explanation noted above, it is recommended that staff be authorized to
represent Authority interests before the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing on the referrals to the City of
Vaughan Official Plan Amendment 400, and that Gardiner, Roberts be retained as legal counsel, as
required. Authority staff should adVise the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York and the
Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing, and continue to pursue the resolution of issues with the
relevant parties.
Report prepared by:
Luch Ognibene Extension 284
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14,1996 B230
RES #871/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is
required to:
(a) construct any buildll1[J or structure or permit any building or structure to be
constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding
during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or per mit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described
in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or
brought to or on such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of
a river, creek, stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the
Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the period of June 14, 1996
to June 13, 1998 for the applications which arc listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
(7:\ 1) RF!gion of PF!F!I - Pllhlic-.Works Dept.
To place fill within a regulated area, to alter a watercourse and to construct in a flood
plain on Part Lots 20 and 22, Concessions 3 and 4 EHS, (Dixie Road between Mayfield
Road and King Street), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill and alter the channols of two watercourses, in conjunction with the
construction of two new culverts within the RoulOnal Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the
Humber River system.
In accordance with the following documents amI plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Candevcon Limitod; Project 92002; Sheets 1 and 2, dated December
1995; received March 15, 1996; Shoots 3 and 4, Revision 2 dated May 16, 1996; received
May 21, 1996. (Total Drawings 4)
(2) letter of Undertaking from K.P. Ho, P. Eng., Region of Peel - Public Works Department; File
96-4090.0, dated May 17, 1996; rocoivod May 21, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
B231 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14,1996
Prnpm:al:
The proposal involves placing fill and altering two watercourses, as part of the replacement of two
culverts along Dixie Road. The Region of Peel's on-going Dixie Road reconstruction project consists of
the replacement of deteriorating and undersized in-stream structures and improvement of traffic
sightlines by changes to the vertical grade of the roadway at several locations. The Region's staff has
received written consent from all landowners affected by the proposed works. They are presently
negotiating the restoration and enhancement of the privately owned areas of the disturbed riparian
zones. Both sites are located within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of
tributaries of the West Humber River.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
A hydraulic analysis submitted with the associated Environmental Assessment Act application has
confirmed that no changes will occur to the existing flood plain as a result of the proposed works.
Pnlh Itinn'
Each site will be isolated by in-stream coffer darns, with stream flow directed around the work sites.
The construction areas will be de-watered for thc duration of the in-stream work. Silt fencing will
control the overland migration of sediment from all other disturbed areas. Where technically feasible,
roadway ditches will be planted with emergent vegetation (ie. cattails) and shrubs to enhance water
quality .
Cnnc;flrv::ltion nf I ::lnn'
All filled and disturbed areas will be revegetated following final grading. Native trees and shrubs will be
planted to rehabilitate the disturbed riparian zoncs at each site. River-run stone will be placed within
the channels and banks for erosion protection and to enhance aquatic habitat.
Policy (1\ Jinfllmflc;'
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program and the associated Environmental Assessment Act
approval.
CFN: 25764 Appl.#:219/93/CAL
For information contact: George Leja (Ext. 342)
Date: 1996.05.27.
(7 :l ?) Tnwn nf C::llflnnn - P::lrks...and_Recreation Department
To place fill in a regulated area on Part Lot 9, Concession 6 (Albion), (Glasgow Road and
Deer Valley Drive, Bolton), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to place granular fill material for the expansion of the parking area at Edelweiss Park,
within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Edelweiss Park Existing Conditions and Proposed Parking Layout Plan; prepared by the
Town of Caledon - Parks and Recro...tion Dopartment; dated February 7, 1996; received
May 21, 1996. (Total Drawings 1)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the baSIS of the following information:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B232
Prnpn!':;!I:
The proposal consists of placing granular fill malorial for the expansion of the existing parking area at
Edelweiss Park. Due to the increasing attendance for soccer matches, the Bolton Wanderers Soccer
Club has requested the Town to expand the pmkillg lot. The site is located entirely within the Regional
Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the I-lumber River. This park is located on MTRCA lands
under management agreement with the Town.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnriing'
The additional parking area will occur outside the 100 year flood plain. Fill (topsoil) to be removed will
be replaced with granular material and predevelopment grades will be maintained.
Pnlllltinn'
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works. The construction site is 150 metres
away from the Humber River.
Cnnsp.rvMinn nf I ;!nri'
Existing trees and shrubs within the proposed parking area will be relocated to another area of the park.
All other disturbed areas adjacent to the parkillg lot will be revegetated immediately following
construction.
Pnlicy C::llirip.linp.s'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (HI - Existing Resource-based Uses - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program. III parlicular, the design of the parking lot expansion has
satisfied the criteria listed in Section 4.1.2(8)(11) lor at-grade parking facilities in municipal recreational
parks which are located within valley and stream comdors.
CFN: 27789 Appl.#:028/96/CAL
For information contact: George Leja (Ext.342)
Date: 1996.05.27.
(7::1 ::I) 11 !i!iQ07 OntanCLllffiL1ed
To construct in a flood plain on 708G Airport Road, Malton, in the City of Mississauga,
Mimico Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a two-storey comlllurcial/residential building within the Regional Storm
flood plain of the Mimico Creek.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 I Site Plan; prepared by Ian W. Nicoll, Architect; Project 1195; Drawing A 1, Revision 2 dated
February 19, 1996; received February 20, 1996. (Total Drawings 1)
(2) Structural Floodproofing Detail; proparud by W. Leung and Associates (Engineers) Ltd.; Job
96044; Drawing SK 1 dated April 30. 1996; received May 24, 1996. (Total Drawings 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the baSIS of the following information:
Propns::!l:
The proposal consists of the demolition of an eXisting commercial building and the construction of a
new six store plaza with one apartment above each unit. The property is located within the Regional
Storm flood plain of the Mimico Creek and the Malton Two-Zone Area. No fill placement is proposed.
B233 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The property is situated within the flood fringe area of the Malton Two-Zone Area. A structural
analysis has been prepared and a detail plan, outlining dry-passive flood proofing measures, has been
submitted showing that the new building will be capable of withstanding the pressures associated with
the Regional Storm flood level and velocity of flow.
Pnlh Itinn'
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works.
Cnnc::p.rv::Itinn nf I ::Inn'
All disturbed areas will be revegetated/stabilized following construction.
Pnlicy C::lIinp.linp.!,:'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment/lntensification within
Established Communities/Highly Urbanized Arci:ls - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program and the development cllte,ia outlined in the Malton Two-Zone Area document.
CFN: 27797 Appl.#:024/96/MISS
For information contact: George LeJa (Ext. 342)
Date: 1996.05.29.
(7::l 4) Thp. RAginn::l1 Mlmir.ipalitY-Qf York
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 7 and 8, Concessions 2 and 3, (Dufferin Street and the
East Humber River), in the Town of King, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to replace an eXisting culvert wlllun the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood
plain of the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents allu plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Dufferin Street Culvert Plans; prep<Jrud by York Region Transportation Dept., and R.V.
Anderson Associates; Drawings B 1. 112 alld B3; revised as received on March 7, 1996.
(Total Drawings 3)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the baSIS of the following information:
Eroposa1:
The applicant proposes to replace an eXlstll1g culvert at Dufferin Street and the East Humber River in
the Township of King. The culvert replacement IS required due to structural deterioration of the
existing culvert.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning..:.
Engineering staff have reviewed a hydraulic Impact report provided by the applicant and are satisfied
that there will be no impact on the control of flooding. The proposed culvert will convey equal flows to
that of the existing culvert.
Pnlhltinn'
The applicant proposes to conduct the works 111 the dry through damming and pumping around the
work area. Sediment fenCing will be erected at the perimeter of the work site.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B234
Cnm:p.rv::ttinn nf I ::tnrl'
The applicant is proposing to restore all disturbed areas through the planting of native materials in
accordance with planting details.
Pnlir.y GlIirlp.linp.c::'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 . Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 27881 Appl.#:049/96/KING
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.05.13.
(7 ~ ~) Rr::tn!':::t Hnmp.c:: I imitp.rI
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 5,
Registered Plan M-1114, (60 Pine Ridge Avenue, Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan,
Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material for minor lot grading and to construct three single family dwellings
within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional SW'III flood plain of the East Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan (1) and Floor Plan/Elevatioll Drawings (19); prepared by Jardin Design Group
Limited; Project 96-6; dated March or April 1996; received May 1, 1996. (Total Drawings
20)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnrnc::::tl:
The proposal consists of placing fill for minor lot grading and constructing three single family dwellings.
The properties are side-by-side and are located wlthll1 the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood
plain of the Humber River, (East Branch) and the Woodbridge Special Policy Area (SPA). These lots
were created through a land severance application submitted by the owner (File No's. B13, B14 and
B15/96). Authority staff requested that the COllllnlllee of Adjustment approval contain a condition
regarding Ontario Regulation 158. (ie. permits required for development of each lot).
Cnntrnl nf Flnnrling'
The perimeter of each building envelope IS SllUloct to minimal flood depths under Regional Storm
conditions. Grading to meet Buildll1g Code ,cqlli,cmcnts will have the effect of floodproofing the
structures to above the level of the Regional StUlm, which is in accordance with the requirements of
the Woodbridge SPA.
Pnlll .tinn'
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works.
Cnnc::p.rv::ttinn nf I ::tnrl'
The filled and disturbed areas around the bulldll1U foundations will be topsoiled and sodded following
construction.
8235 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
Pnli~y C::llirlf!linf!!':'
The proposal is in compliance with the Woodbridoe SPA (Vaughan Official Plan Amendment 440) and
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Malluoemellt Program, Section 4.2.1 - Development in
Established Communities.
CFN: 27959 Appl.#:083/96N AUG
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.05.17.
(7 ~ 11) C::lli1io 8. If!nny Fr;:ln~hi
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 31, Concession 8, (5920 Kirby Road), in the
City of Vaughan, Humber River Watorshed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place sand fill in a regulated ulea of the Humber River (East Branch) in order to
facilitate the construction of a new residence.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Servicing and Grading Plan; propured by EMC Group Ltd.; Project 96127; Drawing 1;
dated April 1996. (Total Drawing 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the baSIS of the following information:
Prorn~;:II:
To place approximately 355 cubic metres of SUIIlJ fill as part of the construction of a new septic
system and undertake grading works aSSOCiated with the construction of a residence.
t.nntrol of Flonrling.:
The works are not located in the RegIOnal Storm flood plain of the Humber River (East Branch).
Pol" .tion'
All disturbed areas are to be sodded immediately upon completion of construction.
Con~f!rvl'ltion of I ;:Inri'
The limit of grading is approximately 15 metres from the top-of-bank of the Humber River valley. This
setback is in excess of the standard 10 metre requirement for slope stability purposes.
Pnli~y C::llirlf!linf!~'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authollty's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program -
Section 4.2.2 G - Infilling on an existll1g lot.
CFN: 27951 Appl.#:080/96NAUG
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.05.21.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B236
(7 ~ 7) M:utin :mri N:m~y MlI~cat
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 20, Registered Plan 3622, (122 Thompson Avenue), in
the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct two two-storey additions totalling an area of 117 square metres to the
existing detached dwelling within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Mimico Creek.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plans; prepared by Studio Adosso Dosign & Development Ltd.; Project 9610; Drawings
1A and 1B dated April 1996; receivod May 14, 1996. (Total Drawings 2).
(2) Flooor/Elevation Drawings; preparod by Studio Adesso Design & Development Ltd.; Project
9610; Drawings 1, 3, 5. dated April 1996. and Drawing 6 dated February 1996; received
may 14, 1996. (Total Drawings 41.
(3) Structural Floodproofing Detail Plans. entitled "Masonry Block Foundation Wall" and "Cast in
Place Foundation Wall"; prepared by J.M. Martins, P.Eng.; dated May 1996; received May
23. 1996. (Total Drawings 21
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the buSIS of the following information:
Prnpn!':::II:
The applicant proposes to construct two two-storey additions to the front and rear of the existing
single family dwelling. The entire property is located within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill
Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek. No fill placement is proposed as part of the construction.
Control of Flooning'
A structural floodproofing analysis has been cOlllfJleted and a detail plan submitted confirming that the
proposed additions will be flood proofed to the Begional Storm flood level.
Polllltion'
No sedimentation is expected as part of the pi ofJosed works.
Con~p.rv::ltion of I ::Inri'
All disturbed areas will be sodded immediately following construction.
Poli~y r,llirip.linp.~'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(CI - MlIlor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27923 Appl.#:069/96/ETOB
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.05.24
B237 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
(7 ~ H) Fip.lngMp. f)p.vp.lopmp.ntc:: Inr.
To alter a watercourse and to construct in a flood plain on Lot 68, Concession 1, (east side
of Bathurst Street, north of King Sidoroad), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a flume for monitoring flows in the East Humber River as part of an
approved monitoring plan which forms part of the Environmental Master Servicing Plan for Lake
WilcoxlOak Ridges (OPA 129).
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Monitoring Location Plan; prepared by Terraprobe; File 90298; Figure 2A; received April 30,
1996. (Total Drawings 1)
(2) Configuration of Monitoring Flumu Plun; propared by Terraprobe; File 90298; Figure 3;
received April 30, 1996. (Total Drawillgs 1)
(3) Profile "Section A-A" Plan; preparod lIy Torraprobe; File 90298; Figure 4; received April 30,
1996. {Total Drawing 11.
(4) Sediment Control & Restoration PlulI; prepared by Terraprobe; File 90298; Figure 5;
received April 30. 1996. (Total Drawillg 1)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Propo!':al:
As part of the approvals process for developmunt withlll Area "C: (north of King Road and west of
Yonge Street) of the Lake Wilcox/Oak Ridges Sucondary Plan (OPA 129) a monitoring program to
assess the impact of development on water quantity and quality in the East Humber River is to be
implemented. One of the components of the monitOring program is the assessment of flows within the
Humber River which includes the installatIOn of a flow measuring device (concrete flume) in the
channel of the watercourse.
Cnntrol nf Flooding'
As no fill will be imported to the site and the uXlsting grades will not be altered, there will be no
impacts on the control of flooding.
Pnlhltion'
A temporary sand bag coffer dam upstream and downstream of the site will be constructed and the
water will be pumped around the construction Ulua to permit construction to proceed under dry
conditions. A geotextile filter at the downstream coffer dam will be installed to prevent silt entering
the river. Any accumulated silt will be removed manually.
Cnm:p.rvatinn nf I ::md.
The areas around the concrete flume will be backfilled with native earth material; a synthetic netting
material will be applied to prevent erosion; and the area will be seeded with a mixture of grasses and
wildflowers. The flume has been designed to allow fish passage and the works will occur during a time
period approved by the Ministry of Natural ResolHces.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 199G B238
Pnlicy C::llirlp.linp.!,:'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 . Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program and with the approved Master Servicing Plan.
CFN: 27963 Appl.#:087/96/RH
For information contact: Barry Knox (Ext. 268)
Date: 1996.05.29.
(7 ~ ~) ROy::i1 Ch::ipin G::irrlp.n!':
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 55, Concession 1 West, (Yonge Street & Gamble
Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Houge River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to undertake the construction of a storm sewer outfall and stormceptor within the
Regional Storm flood plain of the Rouge River to service a small subdivision.
In accordance with the following documents anti IJlans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Storm Sewer Outfall Plan; preparod by Bryan Thomas & Associates Inc.; Project E93-261;
Drawing 12; dated May 1996; rocoivod May 27, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the LJasls of the following information:
Prnpo!':::il:
As part of a Master Drainage Study prepared lor the Elgin West Planning Area (OPA 1181 it was
determined that storm drainage would be dealt With through source controls (ie. infiltration systems)
rather than by a stormwater pond. Road drainiJUO will be outletted to the Rouge River by means of a
storm outfall. A stormceptor will be II1stalled in the system to collect contaminants prior to entering
the Rouge River.
Cnntrnl nf Floorling'
No fill will be imported into the flood plall1.
Pnlhltion'
All road and backlot catch basins will have sediment controls installed during the construction period.
A sediment control fence will be erected aroulltI the perimeter of the construction site. A temporary
siltation control pond will also be constructed 011 taLJleland outside the valley.
Con!':Rrv::ition of I ::inrl'
All disturbed areas will be revegetated on completion of the works.
Policy Gllirlp.linp.!,:'
the proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program and the reqUirements of tho approved Master Drainage Plan for OPA 118,
Richmond Hill.
CFN: 28002 Appl.#: 1 00/96/RH
For information contact: Barry Knox (Ext. 268)
Date: 1996.05.30.
B239 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
(7 ~ 10) n Argyrnpnl line;
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 50, Registered Plan 2477, (67 Don Valley
Drive), in the Borough of East York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to regrade the rear yard of the residential lot which is partially within the Fill Regulated
Area.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site and Elevation Plan, 67 Don Valley Drive; prepared by D. Argyropoulos; received on
April 25, 1996. (Total Drawings 2)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the lJilsis of the following information:
&.oposa1:
The applicant proposes to regrade the rear yard of the property which is partially within the Fill
Regulated Area. The regrading consists of the placement of 15.2 cm of clean fill material covered by
5 cm of top soil. The regrading is required to lovel the rear yard which currently gradually slopes
towards a draw feature connected to the Don River Valley. Grading is not proposed below the top-of-
bank. An addition to the existing residence which is not within the Fill Regulated Area is also proposed
by the applicant.
Pnl" Itinn'
The rear yard is currently fenced. This fence dullllcatos the boundary of placement of fill on the
property and will stop the encroachment of mutcflal into natural areas off site.
Cnne;p.rvl'ltinn nf Il'lnrl'
The rear yard will be restored to original conditions through the placement of sod.
Polir.y GIJirlp.linp.c;'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.2 - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Man<luernent Program.
CFN: 27946 Appl.#: 077/96/EY
For information contact: Russel White (Ext. 30Gl
Date: 1996.05.21.
(7 3 11) C::rl'lhl'lm Nichnls
To construct in the flood plain on Palt Lot 30, Concession 5, (4115 19th Avenue, Almira),
in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a new house located partially in the flood plain.
In accordance with the following documents ami plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Lot Grading and House Siting Contrul Plan. 4115 19th Ave, Town of Markham; prepared by
R. G. McKibbon Ltd.; File No. T-95.13; datod April 26, 1996, received May 1, 1996. (Total
Drawings 1)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B240
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':::ll:
An existing 99 m2 cottage located entirely in tho flood plain of a tributary of Bruce's Creek is to be
demolished and replaced by a larger 312m2 house. The new house will be located further from the
watercourse (50 m away) and largely outside 01 the flood plain. A small 4 m2 portion of the new house
and a 13 m2 portion of a deck will remain in tho 1I00d plain. The new septic system including the
reserve bed is also to be mostly outside of the flood plain except for a small section of the mantle
which represents approximately 5 m3 of fill at tho fringe of the flood plain. This reach is not fill
regulated.
The house and septic system are located as far outside of the flood plain as possible without disturbing
existing mature vegetation and still maintainino the appropriate side yard setback.
Control of Flooning.:
There are no openings in the house below the leuional flood elevation. The new proposal reduces the
flood risk compared to the existing structure alllJ uoes not impact the control of flooding.
Polllltion'
A sediment fence will be erected between the wurk sile and the watercourse to prevent sediment from
entering the watercourse.
Com:FHV::ltion of I ::lnn'
There is no well defined valley feature on this slle. The new house is sited to protect the existing
vegetation and habitats in the stream corridor
Poli~y r,llinp.linp.~'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authorily's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.2.2 (D) Replacement Sllllclures.
CFN: 27958 Appl.#: 084/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 30'1)
Date: 1996.05.22.
(7 ~ 1 ?) .Jo::ln Mnrit~ugu
To construct in a flood plain on Par I Lot 12, Concession 6, (2370 Concession Road 6,
Greenwood), in the Town of PickerillU. Dullins Creek Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a shed at the rear of the existing residential dwelling within the Regional
Storm flood plain of the Duffins Creek.
In accordance with the following documents anu plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan and Shed Details; prepared by Joan Moritsugu; Drawings 1 and 2; received May
13. 1996. (Total Drawings 2)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
8241 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
PrnpnC::::II:
The applicant proposes to construct a 3.6 m by 7 m shed at the rear of the residential lot within the
Regional Storm flood plain. The shed will be utilized in conjunction with an existing residence and barn
which were constructed in the 1920's and are also within the Regional Storm flood plain. Regrading is
not proposed as part of this proposal.
Control nf Flnnning'
The shed will be subject to less than 1 metre of lIooding under Regional Storm flood conditions and is
outside the 100 year flood plain and hydraulic floodway.
Pnl" Itinn'
There will be no impact on the control of pollution.
Cnnc::p.rv::Itinn nf I ::Inn'
The shed is proposed within a manicured sectioll of the rear yard of the property and is more than 50
metres away from the edge of the watercourse.
Pnli~y C::llirlp.linp.!,:'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.2 - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor MUIID{Jerncnt Program.
CFN: 27983 Appl.#:091/96/PICK
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 30G)
Date: 1996.05.21.
(7 :I 1 :I) Rp.ginn::ll MlInicipalitY-OUork
To alter a watercourse on Part LOIS !j and 6, Concession 11, (King Road at Cold Creek), in
the Township of King, Humber RIver Wate/shed as located on property owned by same and
MTRCA.
The purpose is to reconstruct the existll1g KIIlU BODd bridge at Cold Creek, undertake erosion control
works on the banks and undertake associDtcd lul grading works in the flood plain and regulated area of
Cold Creek.
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Region of York. Transportation Dept.; Contract 96-110; Sheets 3, 4 and
5 dated revised April 25, 1996; Shoot S 1 dated revised April 18, 1996; Sheet STG 1;
received June 4, 1996. (TotDI Drawings 5)
(2) Letter from L. Ng, Project Managor. Rogion of York Transportation and Works Dept.; dated
may 30, 1996; received June 4. 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the baSIS of the following information:
&oposaJ :
To construct a new bridge in place of the eXlstlllu structure at Cold Creek; undertake regrading works
at the bridge approaches and construct erOSIOIl cOlltrol works adjacent to the bridge in order to address
an existing erosion problem.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 199G B242
Cnntrnl nf Flnnrling'
The proposed structure is wider than the existlllU structure. Accordingly, the Region has undertaken a
hydraulic analysis of the proposed structure. This analysis has been reviewed by staff and determined
not to affect existing flood levels or velocities.
Pnlllltinn"
The bridge abutments will be set back from tho channel of the watercourse and can be constructed in
the dry. The existing bridge can be removed in soctions and replaced without causing sedimentation.
Staff are currently awaiting shop drawings frolll the contractor in this regard.
l.nn!':F!rv::Itinn nf I ::Inrl'
As part of the project, the Region has identifiod some streambank erosion control works to be
undertaken on Authority owned lands immediatoly downstream of the road right-of-way. In
consultation with Authority and Ministry of Natural Resources staff, the Region will construct bio-
engineered erosion control works and riparian pl,lIltin[Js in this area.
Pnlir.y (11 rirlF!linF!<:;'
The proposed works are in compliance With Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and servicing of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan. The proposal has also been reviewed as a schedule "B"
project pursuant to the Environmental Assesslllent Act. Staff have determined that the erosion control
works will not require a permanent easement. The Region will obtain permission to enter Authority
lands prior to construction.
CFN: 27940 Appl.#:73/96/KING
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.05.21.
(7 ~ 14) Mr.Rn<:;F! FntF!r.pnsesJnc.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 23, Concession 8, (10443 Highway 27-
Kleinburg), in the City of Vaughan, II1IInber River Watershed as located on property owned
by DiPace Management Ltd.
The purpose is to place fill matenal for a tee area illld parking lot associated with a proposed golf
driving range, within the Fill Regulated Area of L1lC Humber River.
(1) Letter and Site Plan; prepared by McRoso Enterprises Inc.; dated and received on May 10,
1996. (Total Drawings 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the baSIS of the following information:
Er.opnsal :
The applicant wishes to place fll' material to create a raised tee area for a proposed golf driving range.
The tee area will be elevated one metre above existing grade. Granular fill material is also required for
a new parking lot. The eastern half of the pI opel t y is located within the Regional Storm flood plain of
the Humber River; however, all fill placement will occur outside the flood plain. The entire property is
located within the Fill Regulated Area. The nppllcant IS leasing the property and written authorization
from the landowner will be received prior to the Illeeting.
8243 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
Cnntrnl nf Flnoning'
No construction activity will occur in the flood plain. The proposed driving range grassed field will
remain at the existing elevation.
Pnllt .tinn'
The raised tee area will be revegetated immediately following final grading. The driving range grassed
field, located in the flood plain, will be overseetlud and mowed. No sedimentation will be generated
from construction.
Cnn~p.rv::ltinn nf I ::Inn'
The site is level and located on the valley floor alld no disturbance of valley slopes will occur. Existing
woody vegetation will be maintained with the exception of two or three dying trees closer to Highway
27 in the location of a proposed patio area, locatud next to an existing quonset hut. The field is
presently void of any trees or shrubs. The applicant will provide a 10 metre vegetated buffer zone,
utilizing native trees and shrubs, along the east sitlu of the field.
Polir.y C::llirlp.linp.~.
The proposal complies with Section 4.1.2 - New Besource-based Uses - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27993 Appl.#:097 196/V AUG
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.05.29.
(7~1!i) N::!tion::ll Golf Club of Canada
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 11. 12, 13, 14 and 15, Concession 6, (134 Clubhouse
Road - Woodbridge), in the City of VmJglwn, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to alter a buried section of a tributary of the East Humber River and to create a more
natural stream corridor.
(1 ) Letter of Undertaking from Mr. Juhn Churry, Golf Course Superintendent, National Golf
Club of Canada, dated June 6. 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Eroposa1:
The proposal consists of creating an open challlwl to replace a 50 metre section of a tributary of the
East Humber River presently buried within a culvert. The remainder of the stream flowing through the
golf course retains an open channel with four existinu on-line ponds along this reach of the stream.
The submitted proposal shows the new channel will be lined with rip-rap and river-run stone with a
series of armourstone drop structures to control expected velocities. A new golf cart bridge will be
constructed and will span the newly created stream corridor. The subject watercourse drains an
upstream area greater than 125 hectares at this location and is not presently fill regulated (fill lines are
proposed in accordance with the on-going Fill Heuulation Extension Program of the Authority).
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996 B244
The site is located between two existing on-lino ponds and the drop in elevation (2 metres over the 50
metre length), coupled with extreme flows following heavy rainfall, precludes the establishment of a
meandering naturalized channel. The proposed chunnollining (Class II rip-rap, 300mm to 600 mm
diameter) and the drop structures, comprised of 3 to 5 tonne armourstone, have been designed to
provide both erosion protection (up to 100 year storm level) and energy dissipation, respectively.
In order to prevent any further blockage of fish /llovement, staff has suggested that the drop structures
be horizontally extended, by utilizing armourstono of varying heights, so that the channel's low flow
can meander around the bed material. The resulting effect would allow for movement of aquatic life up
the new channel, without any intrusion created by large steps in the armourstone. The applicant has
agreed to this design change and has indicated a desire to provide similar treatment at the other
existing armourstone drop structures throughout the golf course. In addition, riparian plantings will be
incorporated along other areas of barren strea/lluank as a long-term enhancement program by the golf
course.
Control nf Flnnrling'
The control of flooding will not be affected uy thu proposed works, since all excavated material will be
removed from the site.
Pnlllltinn'
The work area will be isolated by coffer dallls, wilh stloamflow pumped around the site. The
construction zone will be dewatered for thl: dllliltioll 01 the project. Silt fencing will impede the
migration of sediment from all disturbed areas mJjilcolll to the channel works. In addition, post-
construction water quality enhancement will CUllSISt 01 the inclusions of emergent vegetation (ie.
cattails) and native woody vegetation (ie. trecs ,lIld shrubs) which will assist in filtering out
contaminants.
Cnn"F!rvMinn nf I ;mrl'
All disturbed ground beyond the new channel will be re-sodded to blend in with the existing fairway.
Native woody vegetation will be planted within the disturbed portion of the riparian zone. Existing
mature woody vegetation will be retained arolllld the work site with the exception of four or five
smaller trees located within the new channel i1liUII/llenl.
Pnlir.y C::lJirlF!linF!'"
The re-establishment of a buried watercourse channel and its riparian zone is in compliance with the
Authority's objective for the regeneration 01 strealll corridors and Section 4.2.2(H) - Existing Resource-
based Uses - of the Authority's Valley and Stle,1I11 COIlidor Management Program.
CFN: 27922 Appl.#:068/96NAUG
For information contact: George Leja (Ext. 342)
Date: 1996.05.27.
B245 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
(7 ~ 1 El) Mlmi~ip~lity of MF!trnpolitao..Toronlo Works Dept.
To alter a watercourse at the Lowur Don River south of the CN Bridge to Lakeshore
Boulevard, in the City of Toronlo, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to repair a failing section of tllu slleut pile wall on the west side of the Don Valley
Parkway which is also the east bank of the Don Hivur, within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional
Storm flood plain.
(1 ) Final Proposal Report on the Restorulion of the East Bank of the Lower Don River; prepared
by HBT Agra Earth and Environmunllll; rucuived May 17, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
(2) Planting and Site Plan View, Don Rivor Ealit Bank Rehabilitation; prepared by HBT Agra
Earth and Environmental; Drawing 4; rucoived May 1, 1996. (Total Drawings1)
(3) Planting Details; provided by HilT Aura ElIrlh and Environmental; received June 12, 1996.
(Total Drawings 1)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the I.)ilsis of tile following information:
Prnpnc::~I:
The applicant proposes to repair a degraded secliun of the sheet pile wall on the west side of the Don
Valley Parkway which is also the east bank of 1110 Don River. The works are along a 243 metre section
of the Don River within the Fill Regulated A/ea ami He{Jional Storm flood plain. The first 100 metre
section of the wall will be removed and a 2: 1 slupe will be created in its place with the use of riprap
stone and 300 mm crushed stone. The remaininu 100 metres will be repaired through the placement
of a new sheetpile wall over the existing deuraded wlllI and through the placement of rip rap stone to
serve as a buttress to the new sheet wall. Tllu uve/all result will be a more naturalized river bank
adjacent to the Don Valley. The design was devululJed in consultation with the Lower Don Task Force,
the Waterfront Regeneration Trust and the Cily ur T%nto who are all satisfied with the creation of a
more natural river bank edge.
Cnntrnl of Flnociing:
The applicant has prepared a hydraulic analysis whicll includes an examination of the impacts of
flooding given plans to conduct additional flood protection works in the Lower Don. The hydraulic
analysis also examined the potential flood impacls on tile adjacent Don Valley Parkway and railway
lines. Engineering staff have reviewed this repurl and are satisfied that there will be no impact on the
control of flooding.
Polhltinn'
A silt curtain will be placed within the watercourse along the full length of the work and will remain in
place for the duration of the works. Sedimenl IUllcinu will also be placed between the Don Valley
Parkway and the work site.
Cnn!':F!rv~tion nf I ~nci'
The work will result in a more naturalized rivul u,II1k fur the Don River through the placement of large
riprap stone. Plantings will also be conductud un tllu nuw river bank in accordance with the detailed
planting scheme submitted by the applicants.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 19% B246
Pnli~y C::llirlp.linR<::'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 . IlIfrastructure and Servicing of the MTRCA's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27990 Appl.#: 094/96/TOR
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 30G)
Date: 1996.05.24
(7 ::117) Tnwn nf Whit~hllr~h Stouffvllle
To construct in a flood plain on Pull Lot 31, Concession 9, (Main Street and the Duffins
Creek), in the Town of Whitchlllch Stoullville, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a gazebo within thu HoUiollul Storm flood plain of the Duffins Creek.
(11 Gazebo Structure Site Plan Details; proparod by The Town of Whitchurch Stouffville;
Drawings 1 and 2; received May 23. 1996. (Total Drawings 21
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Propo<::::II:
The Town of Whitchurch Stouffville is propOSII1U to construct a wooden gazebo structure which is
approximately 5.5 metres in diameter on tile sOllth slue of Main Street approximately 10 metres from
the Duffins Creek. The gazebo is proposod wllllln tho designated two zone flood plain. The structure
will be utilized as part of the existing park usu ddJilCU11t to the Duffins Creek.
Cnntrnl nf Flnorling'
The gazebo will be subject to less than 1 motlu 01 II00ulng under Regional Storm conditions and is
outside of the 100 year flood plain and hyulilulic lIoouway.
Pnlllltion'
Sediment fencing will be erected between tile UdllJUO and the watercourse and remain in place for the
duration of the works.
Con<::p.rv::Ition of I ::Inrl'
The site of the gazebo is approximately 10 mulIos 110m the watercourse within an existing municipal
park.
Poli~y C::llirlp.linp.<::'
The proposal is in compliance with the AUtllOllly'::, Villloy and Stream Corridor Management Program as
It relates to Section 4.2.2 - Resource Based USll~.
CFN: 27791 Appl.#: 098/96/WS
For information contact: Russel White (ext. JOG)
Date: 1996.05.21.
B247 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
(7 ~ 1 R) Ynrk [)nwn~ C::nlf ann Cnuntry Club
To place fill within a regulated aloa 011 Part Lots 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Concession V (N.
of 16th Ave. E. of Kennedy RomJ) , 1 own of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located
on property owned by same.
The purpose is to regrade the areas around tllo 1I0los.
1 ) Bunker Reconstruction Plan for Tllu York Downs Golf and Country Club; prepared by
Thomas McBroom Assoc. ltd.: DnawillU G1 rovised June 10, 1996, received June 12,
1996; Drawing G2 revised May 10. 1996, rocoived May 23, 1996. (Total Drawings 2)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on tile basis of tile following information:
Prnrn~al:
The York Downs Golf Course is planning to maku millor modifications to all 27 of the holes on the golf
course. Two of the areas to be modified arc ill tile flood plain and Fill Regulated Area and five are in
the Fill Regulated Area.
Hole 2S
Three existing bunkers are to lJu leUlil(Jud into two larger bunkers in a Fill Regulated Area
on a very shallow slope.
Hole 3S
A new long narrow bunker is to bll uxcavated into the edge of the green on a very shallow
slope. This site is fill regulated IJlll 1101 ill 1110 flood plain.
Three bunkers are to be reshaped pil/I way down the fairway. There will be no measurable
change in grade. This site is in tllu IluuJ JJlain.
Hole 6S
Bunkers around the tee for this lIulu il/O to lJe filled to existing grade and sodded. This area
is in the flood plain.
Hole 8S
An existing bunker and mound ,1/ u lu bo I omoved. There are no slopes at this site. The
site is fill regulated but not in tllo 1I0ud plain.
Hole 2W
Two new bunkers are to excavaloJ iIlJjacollt to the green on a shallow slope. The area is
fill regulated but not in the flooJ plillll.
Hole 4W
Four existing bunkers around tllo luu alo 10 be reshaped. There are no slopes affected.
This area is fill regulated but not 1/1 IlIu f1uuJ plain.
Cnntrnl nf Fla.o.dlng~
The regrading in the flood plain for the two silos is millor and unmeasurable. There will be no net
importation of fill. There will be no measuralJlo impacl on the control of flooding.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 199G B248
Pnlllltinn'
Two sites are close to the watercourse. Thoru willllu a sediment fence erected at these sites to
prevent sediment from entering the watercour su uur ing construction.
Cnn~FHvatinn nf I ::lnn'
There are no issues with slope stability as the slo~e areas to be regraded are very shallow and already
have formal golf course features and gradino.
No trees will be affected at these sites.
There is no work proposed with the riparian cllua (10 metres from the watercourse). However, there is
an opportunity to enhance riparian vegetation aUJ<lcunt to three of the sites. Staff will be discussing
this with the golf course representatives.
Pnlicy C::lIinp.linp.~'
The works are in compliance with the AutllUrllY's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
It relates to Section 4.2.2 (H) Existing Resourcu U.JSUU Uses.
CFN: 28004 Appl. # 102/96/MARK
For Information Contact: Mary Asselstine
Date: 1996.05.31.
(7 ~ HI) Mr ::lnn Mr~ SeaILSeiL
To construct in the flood plalll 011 S YI Lol 19, Plan 5316; Pt. Lot 12, Concession 4, (29
Personna Boulevard), in the Towll oJ Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to replace a house located III lhu fluuu plain.
(1 ) Site Grading Plan, 29 Personna Blvd.; prupmed by Greenpark Renovations; from survey by
P. Salna Co. ltd.; received JUliO 12. 199G.
(2) Floor Plans & Elevations, 29 PurSllrllh. U1vd.; prepared by Greenpark Renovations and
Custom Homes; Drawings A2. AJ. A5. AG; roceived May 14, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the 1l.lsls 01 the fOllowing information:
Prnpn!':::ll:
The applicant is proposing to demolish an eXlsllllU 313 m1 house located in the flood plain and replace
it with a 450 m2 house. The house is to lie luc..luu at the same site as the existing house where the
depth of flooding is approximately 0.5 m. Thuro IS an oxisting access road to the site which crosses
the watercourse. The access road is SUbJUCI lu dUPlhs of flooding of less than 1 metre and velocities
under 0.89 mls under RegIOnal Storm COI1UIIIUI1~
Cnntrnl nf Flnnrling.:
The proposed house will be flood proofed tu lhu HeUlunal Flood elevation. The access is safe for
emergency vehicles as described III the Pr OVIIICla( rJuuu Plain Planning Policy Implementation
Guidelines.
8249 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
Pnlh .tinn'
A sediment fence will be erected between tho wutercourse and the house to prevent sediment from
entering the watercourse.
Cnn~p.rvatinn nf I ;:Inri'
The site of the proposed house is outside 01 1I1U lIparian area. The lot is currently landscaped with
lawn and a few specimen trees. We willlJo oncullIuuing the owner to consider restoring the riparian
vegetation.
Pnlir.y (:;lIirlp.linp.<:'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.2.2 (D) Replacement Structuros.
CFN: 27987 Appl.#:
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 30t!)
Date: 1996.05.24.
(7 ~ ?O) Mr ;:Inri Mr~ (:;p.nffreyJ3ecker
To place fill in a regulated area on Lut 13. Registered Plan 65M-2065, (27 Bronte Road), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge RIVUI Waturshed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill for the constructiun uf a pool.
(1 ) Site Plan Sketch of Rear Yard Shuwing Puul; prepared by Geo-Canada Ltd: received May
17, 1996. !Total Drawings 1)
(2) Cross-section of Timber Crib Wall; prupmud by Geo-Canada Ltd.; Figure 1, received May 2,
1996. (Total Drawings 1)
(3) Grading Plan, 27 Bronte Road. Thorllhill; propared bv Lido Pools; received June 12, 1996.
(4) Correspondence from Mr. Josh 1("11. Prosidont of Lido Pools regarding "Sediment Controls
and Site Restoration re 27 Brulllo Uu.ld. Thurnhill"; dated June 10, 1996: received June 12,
1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the IJ.I:'IS of the following information:
Prnpn~;:I1 :
To facilitate the construction of a swimminu puul the applicant is proposing to place up to 1 metre of
fill adjacent to the valley slope. The fill will lJu GUlllained by a retaining wall. The site of the pool and
the valley wall is gently sloping.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnrling'
The work is not in the flood plain and will nut i1lluGtthu control of flooding.
Pnlh Itinn'
A fence will be erected between the valley Lllld Ihu Silo to contain sediments on the property. All
disturbed areas will be seeded or sodded Inlllludldtuly IUllowing grading and construction.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 199G B250
Cnm::F!rv::Ition nf I ::Inn'
A geotechnical assessment of the slope was ulluortakun which indicated that the existing slope is
stable and that there will be no long or shol t torlll impacts on the stability of the slope caused by the
work. Recommendations were made for tho uoslUn of the retaining wall.
The rear yards through this reach are manicUlou with lawns, gardens and pools. There are no
significant resource features that will be af fectou uy this work.
Policy C::llinF!linF!!':'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valluy and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.2.2(E) Property Improvolllents and Ancillary Structures.
CFN: 27989 Appl.#: 093/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (Ext. 304)
Date: 1996.05.30.
(7 ::\ '1) F::Irh::lng~IDLid
To place fill within a regulated <JIeil on Lot 2, Registered Plan 6350, (33 Fairway Heights),
in the Town of Markham, Don H,vor WatlHshed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to regrade and place fill for ILlndscilpin{) and for construction of a house.
(1 ) Red-line Revision Site Plan. 33 Fillrw,IY lIoiuhts Road; prepared by Tas Enterprises; received
June 12. 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the lJa~ls or the following information:
Prnpnc::::II:
The owner is proposing to demolish and reconstruct a house. The existing house is set back
approximately 2 metres from the top of a well veuewted, 15 metre high slope. The proposed house
will be set back approximately 10 metres f r UIll tho odue. The area between the new house and top of
bank will be regraded as the rear yard. They ill 0 proposing two rustic pathways down the slope to a
small seating area. The eXIsting grades and Ihllulill vegetation on the slope will be maintained.
Control nf Flnnning;
The proposed development IS not in the floou plillll. There will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Polh Itinn'
A sediment fence will be erected at the top uf LJilnk to control equipment and contain sediments.
Com::F!rv::Itinn nf I ::Inn'
A geotechnical assessment is being undertaken tu dotorrnine the stability of the slope and to give
recommendations for foundations and constructIon practices. If staff finds that the slope stability will
be affected, this application Will be withdrawn. I.lecause the structure is being moved away from the
slope, the risk IS reduced.
B251 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
Policy C::lIirlp.linp.~'
The proposal is in compliance with the Autllurity's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.2.2 (D) Replacement Stlllcturos.
CFN: 27981 Appl.#: 088/96/MARK
For Information Contact: Mary Asselstine (Exl. 304)
Date: 1996.05.31.
(7 ::l ??) RO??R? Ont:uin I trl
To place fill on Lots 31, 32 and 33, Hooistered Plan 9, (10462 Islington Avenue), in the
City of Vaughan, Humber River Watorslled as located on property owned by same and
MTRCA.
The purpose is to place fill within a regulated (II oa III urder to facilitate the redevelopment of an existing
lot for commercial purposes.
RES #B72/96 - APPLICATION FOR PERMIT 802282 ONTARIO L TO. PURSUANT
TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THA T the application to place fill in a regulatod moa by 802282 Ontario Ltd. be approved in principle;
THA T staff be directed to bring forward a roport tu tllo Executive Committee giving effect to the
property transfers and easements required tu cOlllploto the works once staff are satisfied with
maintenance and liability provisions;
THA T the acceptability of the proposal to tile Cit y ul Vaughan and any appropriate land transactions
with the City be confirmed;
THAT technical issues pertaining to stormWiJtur llIiJ1wgoment. geotechnical recommendations,
landscape plantings and sediment controls bu iJddrossud to the satisfaction of staff;
AND FURTHER THAT upon completion 01 tllu alJOvu sl<J1f be directed to issue the appropriate permit
pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158. ......................................... CARRIED
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on tile hasls 01 the following information:
Prnpo~:!1 :
To place approximately 9500 cubic metres ul fill in a regulated area of the Humber River (Main Branch)
in order to facilitate the redevelopment of all eXlstillu lot. The proposal involves a 2.5 storey
commercial residential building of approximately 1 UOO square metres in area and associated parking.
The proposal also includes a pedestrian trail IlIIkilUO leading from Islington Avenue to adjacent
valleylands owned by the Authority. Part 01 the fill required for the development will be used to create
an engineered 3: 1 sideslope which will extend Jlilltilllly on to the Authority lands. Part of the grading
required at the south end of the site IS located Ull (I clused road allowance owned by the City of
Vaughan.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, HH.lG B252
R::I~kgrOl mn
The current proposal originated as an Offici,11 PI<ln Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment
application with the City of Vaughan. 802282 Ontario Ltd. purchased the subject property in 1994
with the intention of demolishing an existillU IOsiuence and constructing a new commercial building and
associated servicing. The onginal permit appliclItlon was filed at that time but was deemed premature
by staff prior to consideration of the plannlllU application. As part of the planning process, Authority
and City of Vaughan staff established a devuloplllollt limit for the site. This development limit
represented an acceptable boundary betweun thu vulloy and tablelands as the original slope was
terraced. This limit was also in conformancu with tho development limit established for the adjacent
Doctor's House restaurant parking lot. The valloyland portion was to be zoned open space and
dedicated to the Authority. The Official Plan Amonument application was approved on this basis by
the City and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs. TillS activity took place in the fall of 19951 early 1996.
In the spring of 1996, Mr Andrea Greco, the ownor of the property, approached staff with a revised
proposal to place fill beyond the establisheu uuvuloplllunt limit. The rationale for this request was
based in part on the approval given in August 1 ~EH) uy the Authority to permit the placement of fill by
Hodgson Development Corporation in order to illlow thu expansion of the parking lot at the Doctor's
House Restaurant in an adjacent ravine fe<ltlllU. MI. Gruco was of the opinion that the valley feature at
the rear of his property was Similar to the fCillulll on the Doctor's House property.
Mr. Greco also indicated that he was preplll uu to plOvlue the area of his parking lot created through the
placement of fill as an area available to till! conlnllllllty as a site for the stage for the Binder twine
festival.
Cnntrol nf Flnnding'
The lands are not located withll1 the ReglOlwl StOl1ll flood plain of the Humber River. A stormwater
management report has been prOVided inUlciltlllu both major and minor system controls for the site.
MlI10r system flows will be directed to all CXI~tIlIU stolm sower on Islington Avenue. Major system
flows will be piped around the perimeter of thu ::'llu .JIlU outletted to the Humber valley.
Pnlh Itinn'
Sediment control during construction call UU ..c1I1UVUU through a combination of construction staging
and sediment fencing. Staff are satlsfleuthill till::' wllllllinimize sedimentation on the adjacent
Authority lands.
Cnnc::erv::Itinn nf I ::Inn'
The applicant has provided a geotechnical I CpOlt illld mJdendum examining the stability of the existing
slope, impacts of the fill placement and COllsllucllllll techniques. Staff have reviewed these reports
and are satisfied that the works can be call ICU out Without Significant risk of slope failure. The
proposal also incorporates plantll1gs of natlvu tlllUS <IIlU shrubs on the filled sideslope and the adjacent
Authority land in order to promote regeneratlulI 01 t1w mea. Public access through the Greco property
will be provided to the Authority property. T111~, IlIilY survo as part of a future trail link between the
Main and East Humber Rivers through Klellluul U
E.oJ.icy C::llineline~'
The original application for this proposal was rucUlvuulJ/ior to adoption of the Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program. Staff had ost.IIJIi::.hou tho onglnal development limit in accordance with
the watershed plan policies in place at tho tllIlU. fho currellt proposal involves the placement of fill
beyond the top of bank and is therefore COlltl ill Y to uoth the original watershed plan policies and the
Valley and Stream Corrrdor Management PIOUIiIlIl. Tho general direction given in the Watershed Plan
(1980) with respect to valleys IS as follows:
B253 E.XECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
The policies and programs in the Watershed Plun which apply to well defined valleys have as their
overall thrust, the retention of valleys from tup ul slope to top of slope as natural units capable of
passing Regional flood flows, avoiding devcluplllunt that would be hazardous to life and property and
retaining the opportunity for preservation 01 1I1u woll defined valleys as public open space areas
consistent with municipal official plan policies.
The relevant policies from the Valley and St,eum Curridur Management Program (1994) are as follows:
3.2.1.C)
Alterations of Valley Corridors through activitios such as filling or enclosure shall not be permitted to
create additional useable area and/or to accunlllludato development.
Staff have had several meetings with the prupunont, ropresentatives of the Kleinburg Area Residents
Association and the City of Vaughan. As a losull ul those meetings, an agreement has been reached
which contains the following elements:
1. Authority to allow fill placemelll as sot uut in this application to allow expanded parking for
the Greco development (will includo loqllirolllont for maintenance easement on Authority
lands);
2. Greco to construct a trail integlatmJ inlu the fill slope at the rear (west) of the site to allow
for current valleyland access alld tllllllU triJillinkage; also to provide the Authority with a
permanent easement for access;
3. Greco to provide an easement in favuur 01 the Binder twine Festival Committee at the rear
of the parking lot in order to plOvido a permanent location for the Binder twine stage.
Staff are of the opinion that a policy variance is warranted in this instance as this proposal will result in
an overall benefit to the community. The Klelllullr U Area Residents' Association has been extensively
involved in all aspects of the site plan and uuildillU design and are very supportive of the project as part
of a revitalization of the Kleinburg Village CU/O.
Staff note that the completion of this agreemunt I equires confirmation of the following:
- approval for the appropriate easemonts lJutween the Authority and 802282 Ontario Ltd.;
- confirmation that the City of Vmluhan has no objections to the revised site plan and that
appropriate arrangements are made with regard to works on City lands;
- confirmation that 802282 Ontario Ltd. has provided a suitable easement to the Binder
twine Festival Committee to allow lur the lestival use;
- clarification of certain minor details portaining to the geotechnical report landscape plan,
stormwater management system Hlld sedllllent controls.
CFN: 26591 Appl.#: 214/94/V AUG
For information contact: Brian Denney (Ext. 21\2)
Date: 1996.05.24.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 199G B254
RES #873/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Pursuant to Ontario Regulatloll 158 written permission from the Authority is
required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be
constructed in or on a ponu or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding
during a Regional Storlll;
(b) place or dump fill or pcrlllit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described
in the schedules whethcr such fill is already located in or upon such area, or
brought to or on such U1ca from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, uivurt or interfere in any way with the existing channel of
a river, creek, strcillll, or watercourse.
A permit may be refuseu till ulIuh a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the
Authonty, the conservatlun 01 lanu, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THA T permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Hugulation 158 for the period of June 14, 1996
to June 13, 2001 for the applications which mu Ii stud bulow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
(7 ~ 73) Rnlngirl np.vp.lnpmentsJoc.
To place fill within a regulateu ,lIeil UII Purt Lot 13, Concession 8, (8811 Highway 27,
Woodbridge), in the City of Valluh.ul, 1I1IIIIuer River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill matenal In a Fill HeUlIldtcu Area of the Robinson Creek corridor as part of
the grading required to develop a plan of SllUUIVI:iIUn (HoulIlson Creek Estates - 19T-95095).
In accordance with the following documents allU plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Grading Plan/Erosion and Sedilllunt Cuntrul Plan; prepared by EMC Group Limited; Drawing
No. 95113-GR1, Rev. 1 dated Fuurlh.ry 20. 1996; received March 27, 1996. (Total
Drawings 1).
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on 1111: IJ"~IS 01 the following information:
Eropasal :
The proposed works consist of placing fllllUl UlddulU as part of the Robinson Creek Estates
subdivision (19T-95095). The proposal illvulvu:. lilhllU ils$ociated with a new road and general lot
grading to achieve the required grades to CUIII UIIII tu thu storrnwater management report for the
subdivision. Only a small portion of the new I udd .uld adJilcent lots are situated within the Fill
Regulated Area.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnciing;
No part of the site is situated within the RCUllllI.1I Sto'lI\ flood plain of the Robinson Creek. Minor and
major system storm drainage will be directed III tllu Pluvlously approved stormwater (quantity/quality)
pond within the adjacent Woodbridge Mcaduw~ ~1I\)uivlsion. The existing pond has been designed to
accept storm drainage from the subject lallll:..
B255 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
Pnlllltinn'
Silt fencing and catchbasin silt traps will cOlltrul souilllontation during construction.
Cnm:F!rv::Itinn nf I ::Inn'
All filled and disturbed areas will be stabilizou/rovo{jutatod following final grading. No fill placement
will occur below the stable top-of-bank 01 tho l{olJillson Creek valley corridor. The physical top-of-bank
and structural setbacks have been previously oswblishod through staff's review and comments on the
draft plan of subdivision.
Pnli~y C::llinF!linF!~'
The proposal is in compliance with Sectiun II .1.1 - Nuw Development of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27898 Appl.#:056/96NAUG
For information contact: George Leja (Ext. 3'1/)
Date: 1996.05.24.
(7 ~ '4) ThF! Tnwn nf Caledon
To alter a watercourse on Part Lul !J, CUllcussion 7, in the Town of Caledon, Humber River
Watershed as located on propul! y ownuu lJy Harbourview Investments Ltd. and Mr. and
Mrs. Ostas.
The purpose is to construct two stormwalul IIhlllauulllont ponds on an intermittent tributary of the
Humber River.
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Falby Burnsidu 1I1ld Assuciatos Ltd.; Project 9606; Drawings P2-1 dated
March 1996; Drawings P2-3 alld P2-3 dillod May 1996; Drawings P3-1, P3-2 and P3-3
dated May 1996; Drawings El dllll [2 ddtod March 1996; Drawing G1 dated May 1990.
(Total Drawings 9)
(2) Letter of undertaking; from Mr. G. lIubbort. Enginoering Assistant, Town of Caledon; dated
May 6, 1996 regarding Landscdpu PI,ln.
(3) Letter from J.D. Ostler. Town Sullcllor. Tuwn of Caledon; dated May 17. 1996 regarding
land issues.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on thu IJ..:'IS 01 tho following information:
&oposat :
To construct two stormwater managemenl pOi Ill:, UII illl inlermittent tributary of the Humber River in
order to facilitate development of the BollulI-Suuth I till uovelopment area.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnnin~
The proposed ponds are known as Pond IIUIIIIJUIS 2 .1I1t! 3 in the Bolton-South Hill Master Drainage
Plan. This plan was originally approved lJy lhu I UWII i1I1U Authority staff in 1990 and updated in 1994.
The ponds will provide a combination of willul qu,llIl'ly (2 through 100 year) and quality (25mm - 24
hour detention) run-off control as specified III IIIU nlilslor drainage plan update. The site is currently not
fill regulated and a floodline has not been uslillJli~hut! duo to the drainage area (78 hectares). Pond 2
already exists in an interim deSign (Seasunud Illvuslnlonts - approved by the Authority in 1991).
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1 UUU B256
Pnlhltinn'
An erosion and sediment control plan has buull loul1(J acceptable by staff. The majority of the
construction works can occur in dry conditlOllli tllloUllh staging. Sediment fences and a vegetated
buffer will also be used to control erosion <llld liudimcntation from adjacent grading activities.
Cnn!,:p-rv;:Jtinn nf I ;:Jnn'
The Town has undertaken to provide a compl UhUlllilVU restoration planting plan. As there is currently
no woody vegetatIOn in the area this will rep,uliullt WI increase in the habitat and water quality
functions of the existing interim Pond 2.
Pnlicy C::I dnp-linp-I:;'
The proposal is in compliance with the Valluy 1II1d Stloam Corridor Management Plan, Section 4.3 -
Infrastructure and servicing. It also represellt:. illlplullIuntation of the Bolton - South Hill Master
Drainage Plan (noted above).
As part of the master drainage planning P'OCUSS, tllU consultants for the proponents had noted that the
increased duration of flows outletting frOIll !'ullds 2 and 3 would have the potential to impact the dam
structure of a pond located immediately dOWIl:.lruoJlIl III the City of Vaughan (known as Pond A). The
Town has provision for sufficient funds to undertaku rustoratlOn work on Pond A and has directed
Town staff to obtain the necessary easemcll\:. III tillS rUlIard. The Pond A reconstruction will be the
subject of a future permit application.
CFN: 27802 Appl.#:035/96/CAL
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ex\. 2U 1)
Date: 1996.05.21.
(7 1 ?!i) Hp-;:Jthp-r P;:JtteLsoD-aod Darrell IILJdaputh
To construct In a flood plain on 1'.111 l.ot 1. Heglstered Plan 65R-9765, (50 Park Drive), in
the City of Vaughan, Humber HIVUI Waturshod as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct an attached duck ,IIIIIIIIUII to an existing townhouse in the flood plain of
the Humber River (Main Branch).
In accordance with the follOWing documenls 011111 plalls which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan and Cross-sections; I)/IIP,II uti lJy lIpplicallt; dated May 22, 1996.
(Total Drawings 4)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on III() l)oI~,IS ur tho following information:
Prnpnl:;;:Jl:
To construct a deck addition to an existlllu IOVIIllholl:;u III the flood plain of the Humber River. The
townhouse development on Park Drive IS 10CoIIIIII III Ihu Woodbridge Special Policy Area. No fill is
proposed as part of the works.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning..:.
The area of the proposed deck is subject 10 1IIIIIIIIIal flooding under Regional Storm conditions,
approximately 0.2 metres. The deck surfacu Will bu .,bove the Regional elevation and the structure will
be wet flood proofed to the Regional Stolm f1uod uluvatlon.
Pnlicy l,llinp-linp-I:;'
B257 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 1996
The proposal is in compliance with the Vallcy amI Stream Corridor Management Program, Section
4.2.2.(C) - Development within Existing Speciul Policy Areas and the Woodbridge Special Policy Area
document (City of Vaughan Official Plan Alllcllulllont #440)
CFN: 28018 Appl.#: 1 08/96/V AUG
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 2U 11
Date: 1996.06.07.
RES #B74/96 - REPORT ON TENDER OPENING SUB-COMMITTEE
FOD96-20, Bulk Maple SYIlIP
The Tender Opening SlIb-COllllllittce opened tenders for the purchase of bulk maple
syrup on June 7, 199G. lllC lelluors received were referred to staff for review and
report to the Executive IIlCutlllU Oil JUlle 14, 1996.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT Report #18/96 of the Tender OpellillU Suh-Cummittoo be received;
AND FURTHER THAT tender #FOD96-20 fur IUlty (40) drums of Canada #1 medium grade maple syrup
be awarded to Robinson Maple Products. ill thu lutill tHlIn of $36,900.00, it being the lowest quotation
received and meeting specifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The following seven (7) companies were rcquoslou tu blu Oil the supply of bulk maple syrup for our
1997 program at Bruce's Mill and the Kortliulll CUI1I'u lor Conservation:
Bill Robinson Smokey Kettle
Crinklaw's Maple Products Shaw's Maple Products
Jay Robson Gilbertson Enterprises
Duncan MacArthur
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Funds for the purchase are identified in Accoullt 1I:J2!J-11-212.
Report prepared by:
A.D. Leach, Extension 251
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/96, JUNE 14, 199G B258
TFRMINA TION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:20 a.m., June 14, 1996.
Rir.h:uci O'RriF!n J. Craig Mather
Chair Sucrulary- Treasurer
Ipl
~
, the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #5/96 Page B259
July 12, 1996
The Executive Committee met in the Humber Room, 5 Shoreham Drive on Friday, July 12, 1996. The
Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m.
PRESENT
Lorna Bissell ...................................................... for Lois Griffin
Michael Di Biase ........................................................ Member
Lois Hancey ................................................. Vice Chair, Authority
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard O'Brien. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair, Authority
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard Whitehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
REGRETS
Lois Griffin ............................................................ Member
Joan King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
OPENING OF PROPOSALS
A proposal opening for the sale/lease of Authority-owned land, located east of Islington Avenue, south
of Rutherford Road, in the City of Vaughan, was held during Executive Committee Meeting #5/96. Only
one proposal was received; a joint proposal from Father Claudio Moser, In Trust (Franciscan Brothers)
and Blackplate Investments Inc. for the offer to purchase, as detailed on the following page:
8260 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
BRATTY and PARTNERS
B.UUUftZIII .... SOLICrI'mII
1..,. ~ ca,poaa. Q.c:. ~ r. lInaY. Q.c:. an.. L. WlIIMIA. Q.C. MIdIII8 CalIrI. .%Gdll1aar
....-JIw- MkiMlH. 0... w-.L.~ 4110 v.... StnB
.... M. :.- PIal MomoII ..... A. c:.- !"-* YCIiI, a.n.. M2N QC.
l:My 0. ~ _ L _ ..". A..... r....-. (1111) ~
MInI I. ..... J_ Co VlaII ~ L ~ '-Ie (1111) m.6D5
_c:. v-...u a...... ~ ~~ ........,...../f._
~UIIt .~...J.
............. ....~~-
s.. by la . ..,.....
~ 11. 1....
". ~ T_ _ ,,_ c.. ......_
'_DIM
a..-. c....ne
... 114
a.. 11m
,.. ____1M. (,,,,,,,'1___
The ~_y r..... .... A.... c..........llII~.......... ,.MT'ItCA., . 10...,.,....... ....
_ ,_~ _.111 cr.-,''''---'_
_ TIle ""___ll.. T_"" ,,_ ~_ _.10__
'-' M tm: 11.. c....... 7 CIv of v........ "........ ~ tlf "8ft . :11 ..,..
"'-lie _ _ _.. _ _ 1... _.... Mr. ~ "'-_ ~ __.. _ WICIt
__ _ far _ _.t _ _~. ,_._1_
W. _ ___ OIl offer ... __ _ .. offw ... tile "...... ~ _ ,_ 1. lIII _....._.......- I..... -
_... _ u_1/Ie 0_"'- ~ _... MTIIC.\.
__ _ tile "'........lIteUwe _ ..-... . 1_ .~ ~ _ '_Ill lIII Ue.' ..._... I..... _ haw
....... __ ,.., _ ..._ to U1W .--.
The ~ of I'Ilrcnae nI SIIe ... !llacblna -- tI1a '*- ._ IlftI\II--=
1. A _ of 10...... 0' 1_ ta be pureftaM;
%. A _ _ of 1180.0=.00 par acm
J. 7.S'll of lIII ~ _ -. 11:11,000.00 .. . _aIUnUWa a.... ,_ _ .... ---, _ ... ~TlIc:A1l
.. A rurow ~ ot 2.,,, .t _ .......... 1If1a. Itaint ''',llOD.OO. 10 .... _ _
L __ "","",,.f "00.000.00:
L ~... -.... _ 01 ____ h_ _ __ .,.......... .. _..... In IN "_ of _ _ .aIaI
7. ___- _....., __ _ at _ _,.,. _ _In lIII ~
L -.., ,. .. IItW"IdM at ......... .-., -
" ____ -om. rIIIf ",. ~ _ I.... r... IlII _......__
'llw ......_ of _.. _ SIIe by lIII Fra1toI.- __ _ 1M I.......... .daM ~
1. II _ at 10 _ of 1_ 10 lie _a.r.
%. "pwcItaa _ of .,ao.Ooo.oo pw un:
2. " ~ ., .,1.=00.= IIIl'ftIou&IY palll '"" CYNmIV _ ... MTIlc:A1I
.. CollI Oft c:Ioalnt;
So ~ 1ft ...... I'"If MTIlCA MIIafl.. 011 of "" ~ llIldar lIII "- of I'IftftaM .... Salal
L ~..-. cenfIrnt din lM'f .. _el....,. ~ 1_ r., _ ~~_
lit -.y. tlta It___ ~ ... U\a ,,~..... " _ .. ,.......
lei T_ Sola. = 1tlnI1w. . '1.&00.000.00
Ta J:!I:-
lIil CMIt ..... by MTIlCA 1ft '11'
. ~ _. n &OD.aao.oo
. --- .....elIlndaIa __ . 1311.00a.ca
.----- 'tan
,.. '1,~.
!at ~ II"" "'_.t ~- - .... S:!I:RI
W. _lIIII-./olnt __ I. .ntSfnmtV rar _ ~
.... - "- - -. willi .._ 10 ..."- ............ of ~. .... '.... .... .. _ -.. .. __ lIII _ ..nil
_,. 11__ _ MI. "'_ ...... .....ct III "'_ Iramwa.
or... ....., "..,..
IllAm AND r"
~
"'" __... 0wIaiIl
,..
-.My It. 1.... 0_ J...., ..L?.... 1.11.
"" :-7j~/
A /'1{,.,.,. AIIfll
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B261
RES #B75/96 - OPENING OF PROPOSALS
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
IT WAS AGREED AND RECOMMENDED THAT the proposal received from Father Claudio Moser In
Trust and Blackplate Investments Inc. be referred to staff for review and report to the next Authority
meeting, and if necessary to a special meeting of the Executive Committee. . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
RES #B76/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #4/96, held June 14, 1996 be approved. ............... CARRIED
BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
Councillor Richard Whitehead, on behalf of The Town of Caledon, expressed the Town's appreciation
for The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's efforts to stop the urbanization of
the Cold Creek Area; referring to page 8224, Res. #869/96 - The Town of Caledon Official Plan
Amendment 114. -
RES #B77/96 - DELEGATIONS
(a) Mr. Rafael Nebres, owner of 41 Springbank Avenue in Toronto, requesting the Authority's
financial assistance in moving his house.
(b) Mr. Lou Pompili representing Father Claudio Moser In Trust, regarding disposal/lease of
Authority-owned lands, east of Islington Avenue, South of Rutherford Road, in the vicinity of
Vaughan.
(c) Ms. Violet Robinson, owner of 39 Springbank Avenue in Toronto, in support of the Authority's
interest in erosion stabilization of residential properties on Springbank Avenue.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Lorna Bissell
THAT the above delegations be heard and received. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
B262 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
RES #B78/96 - CORRESPONDENCE
(a) A letter, from Mr. Simon Ng of Simon H.K. Ng, Architect, representing Mr. Rafael Nebres,
owner of 41 Springbank Avenue in Toronto, being a request for financial assistance to
move his house.
(b) A letter, received from Pine Valley Village Community Association President, Ms. Emily Elapes,
opposing the sale/lease of Authority-owned lands east of Islington Avenue, south of Rutherford
Road for residential purposes.
(c) A letter, dated June 25, 1996, from A.P. Crawford, Manager, The Town of Richmond Hill ,
regarding the Bayview Avenue Extension, Stouffville Road to Bloomington Road.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Lorna Bissell
THA T the above items of correspondence (b) and (c) be received. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
MOTION TO REFER
RES #B79/96
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT item of correspondence (a) be referred back to staff for report to the next Authority meeting on
the status of erosion hazards along Springbank Avenue, the history of Authority involvement and a
recommended course of action.
RECORDED VOTE - MOTION TO REFER
Lorna Bissell .............................................................. Yea
Michael Di Biase ........................................................... Yea
Lois Hancey .................................................. ...... ...... Yea
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nay
Richard O'Brien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
Enrico Pistritto .......... ......................... ........ ... . ....... ... ... Yea
Richard Whitehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yea
THE MOTION WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B263
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
RES #B80/96 - THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO V ALLEY AND
SHORELINE REGENERATION PROJECT 1992-1996
Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #20 196
Tender ES96-03, East Point Park, City of Scarborough
Award of Contract ES96-03 Storm Sewer Outfall, East Point Park, City of
Scarborough.
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Tender ES96-03 for Storm Sewer Outfall, East
Point Park, City of Scarborough, be awarded to Drainstar Contracting Limited for the tendered amount
of $120,278.28 (including G.S.T.I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
RATIONALE
Tenders were advertised for the supply and installation of concrete pipe and storm sewer inlet and
outfall structures at East Point Park. This work will replace an existing system that has failed and has
resulted in significant erosion into the park tableland. This is the first phase of work required to
stabilize the gully.
Nine tenders were opened on June 21, 1996 with the four lowest bids as follows:
Total Price (including GST)
Drainstar Contracting Ltd. $120,278.28
R. & M Construction $125,171.60
Dagmar Construction Inc. $140,442.21
Sartor and Susin Limited $161,284.82
All the tenders were arithmetically correct and complete, complying with the general tendering
requirements.
The consultant for this project, Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, reviewed the four lowest bids and
checked references on the low bidder. The consultants are satisfied that the low bidder, Drainstar
Contracting Limited is qualified and capable of undertaking the contract work and meeting the required
completion date. They recommend the award of this contract to Drainstar Contracting Limited. The
consultant's estimate for this work was $162,500.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work will be available in account no. 222-14. Funding for the Authority's share (50%)
will be available under the "Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration
Project 1992-1996" approved at Authority Meeting #3/91.
The Metropolitan Toronto Works Department has agreed to fund the remaining 50% of this project.
Report prepared by:
Nigel Cowey (ext. 244)
B264 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
RES #881/96 - RENEWAL OF INSTALLATION AGREEMENT WITH TRANSPORT
CANADA FOR USE OF AUTHORITY OWNED LAND FOR
AIRCRAFT NOISE MONITORING SYSTEM
Receipt of a request from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for approval of
the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, for renewal of an
existing installation agreement with Transport Canada in the vicinity of Acacia
Avenue, City of North York
CFN 23033
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE exECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is the owner of Part of Lot 12, Concession VI. and Lot 247, Registered Plan
1842, City of North York, in The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND WHEREAS the subject lands have been turned over to The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto,
in accordance with the terms of an agreement dated June 14, 1961;
THAT the Authority approve renewal of the installation agreement with Transport Canada for a term of
3 years commencing April 1, 1996, on the basis as set out in the attached copy of Clause 13
contained in Report No. 7 of The Corporate Administration Committee, which was adopted by the
Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto at its meeting held on April 24, 1996.
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give affect thereto. including obtaining necessary approvals and the
execution of any documents. .............................................. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
On February 15, 1979 the Authority, with the agreement of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto,
entered into an agreement with the Ministry of Transport, representing Her Majesty the Queen in Right
of Canada, authorizing Transport Canada to install a pole-mounted monitoring facility to record aircraft
noise on Authority lands on Acacia Avenue, City of North York.
The agreement was continuously renewed by the Authority until March 31, 1994. The Authority then
turned over to Metro the yearly administration of the licence, and since April 1, 1994, Metro has been
responsible for its management.
A sketch illustrating the Authority-owned land affected is attached for the information of the Members.
RATIONALE
The management of these lands is compatible with the Authority's objectives.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B265
FINANCIAL DETAILS
In accordance with the terms and conditions of the management agreement, no revenue or expense
will be incurred in this instance by the Authority.
Report prepared by:
Lori Colussi, ext. 303
8266 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
Map - acadia
.\.;lI:JIl:.I'~l:.U I'Lnl.1 IU 1,-
-4CESSION VI WEST ()I YOI\JGE STREET
"ORTH YORK, COUNTY l'l YORI<
5(" I\l.1.: I'. .10
---
__I
. ----:- ~;:7
_',""".
\ 'O~I~~.~rl
.. "'....10 "'''.'1
} ..-": ROAO Z' 11',,\,. " .."
\ ''''''lOON \ .7"27'50 [t.... 0,'0"
F\..1N ON AoaO '''.,. .' 1\
~ . \ 'OANt.11. 'f ALlll _,'- r
1M 'I IUllh' 'Y'-(wt4,.1 _~\~ ~
"'v , "." \ ~i;11 'II'"'' p~ NEAr~Gt..ELOT738
);j tr-- / / ,,,...\ ,\ .
(' \'~ M:.'./'..... / I
'I ,
. ,. \, "/."i I
. )l1,n
, ,
, 3) f
" I
~ / I ;
, ,
:i' i ;' I'
u"
,d' ('"6'.", ~
Id FRaH~ AHZIL ,I I
. .t~1 ,,' \tto:.,,, .: I .
anu., '" Act : J ;
PAR T OF COT >2 11 CON, \~ V, '.',
I I '_ ."
I I "'.
""I
~:-: --'
/ 0 ~ '.
f ~_ ~
'! ~.
,. '.
.
,.... , - -
-
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B267
RES #B82/96- REQUEST FOR USE OF AUTHORITY-OWNED LANDS
West of Islington Avenue, South of Nashville Road
Village of Kleinburg, City of Vaughan
The Authority is in receipt of a request from 802282 Ontario Ltd. to utilize a small
portion of Authority-owned land, west of Islington Avenue, south of Nashville
Road in the Village of Kleinburg, Humber River Watershed.
CFN #28062
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Authority is in receipt of a request
from 802282 Ontario Ltd. to utilize 0.2 acres, more or less, of Authority-owned land being Part of Lot
24, Concession 8, in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York and further described as Part
2, Plan 65R-16394, to allow the placement of fill to accommodate facilities for the Binder Twine
Festival, trail development, parking and ravine reforestation;
THAT the Authority enter into an agreement to be registered on title with 802282 Ontario Ltd. on the
following basis:
Ii) 802282 Ontario Ltd. be solely responsible for all costs associated with the placement and
maintenance of the fill
(ii) 802282 Ontario Ltd. to indemnify and save harmless the Authority from any and all actions or
claims of any nature related directly, or indirectly, to the construction and maintenance of the
land
(iii) 802282 Ontario Ltd. to provide suitable liability in a form acceptable to the Authority
(iv) 802282 Ontario Ltd. post securities in an amount acceptable to the Authority to be held for a
two year period following completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Authority
(v) That all work be in accordance with technical studies and the permit issued pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158
(vi) Any other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the solicitors for the Authority
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give affect to, including obtaining the necessary approvals and the execution
of any documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
B268 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
BACKGROUND
At Meeting #4/96 the Executive, under Resolution #B72/96 adopted the following:
THA T the application to place fill in a regulated area by 802282 Ontario Ltd. be approved in principle;
THA T staff be directed to bring forward a report to the Executive Committee giving effect to the
property transfers and easements required to complete the works once staff are satisfied with
maintenance and liability provisions;
THA T the acceptability of the proposal to the City of Vaughan and any appropriate land transactions
with the City be confirmed;
THA T technical issues pertaining to stormwater management, geotechnical recommendations,
landscape plantings and sediment controls be addressed to the satisfaction of staff;
AND FURTHER THA T upon completion of the above, staff be directed to issue the appropriate permit
pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
As the foregoing resolution indicates, a permit for this has been issued subject to the proposal meeting
the technical requirements of the Authority.
The subject parcel consists of a fragment of land, being part of a larger area acquired from Hodgson
Development Corporation in July, 1994, under the Humber River Flood Plain Lands Component of the
Land Acquisition Project.
Attached is a map showing the location of the subject lands.
Report prepared by:
Ron Dewell, extension 245
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 8269
Map - Nashville/Islington
.
.
B270 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
RES #883/96- THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON
The Corporation of the City of Brampton has requested conveyance of a parcel of
Authority-owned land for a road widening for the reconstruction of McVean Drive.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from The Corporation of the City of Brampton for
conveyance of a parcel of Authority-owned land required for the reconstruction of McVean Drive;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate
with The Corporation of the City of Brampton in this instance;
THAT a parcel of Authority owned land containing 0.942 hectares, more or less 12.328 acres) be
conveyed to The Corporation of the City of Brampton for a road widening for the reconstruction of
McVean Drive, said land being Part of Lots 6 and 7, Concession 8 Northern Division, City of Brampton,
Regional Municipality of Peel;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THAT the conveyance be subject to the Authority's technical requirements being satisfied;
THA T said conveyance be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section 21 (2)
of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the
execution of any documents. .............................................. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Corporation of the City of Brampton has conveyed land to the Authority over the years for the
nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that this parcel be conveyed for the nominal
consideration of $2.00. The Corporation of the City of Brampton has agreed to assume all legal, survey
and other costs involved in completing this transaction.
The subject lands were acquired from the Estate of J. McVean in June 1971 under the Ebenezer Dam
and Reservoir Project and from 57 Holdings Limited in March 1977 under the Humber River Flood Plain
Lands Component of the Land Acquisition Project.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B271
The technical staff has advised that there are technical issue still outstanding relating to the road
reconstruction. However, these issues should not affect the amount of land required. The conveyance
will not be completed and construction will not commence unless these issues are resolved.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, extension 223
8272 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
McVean Drive - map
--
. . rl
....
\
\
~;~'
-- It
.' \ ' '
...
- ~
..0., -
"-
-~7'
- '
-
-- - ----
.-
,-
.' -, vv~~..:,...
-
-, , \'-~'._'
"
~ '. " ~
- -
- - .
i , - -
~
-~ ' -
-- ~.~~ ," ......-----
, ,- .~ .-
. ,~ -.-,. - -
-' -
- - ------------------- -~ T
- -
,- .
'.' . . -
"
---/ -{', 0
... / ~\\
,
; ~ .,
.. ....
-
.... " -
, -.
--- .,-"'" ~........%,l...."'~
.. -. .,
,/
,/ (~:
, ~ -
",
}
-
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B273
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES #884/96- REQUEST FOR CONVEYANCE OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LAND
AND BUILDINGS AT THE GUILD INN TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF
METROPOLITAN TORONTO
Further review of the potential disposal of certain lands and buildings at the Guild
Inn to The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, CFN 22648D
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Lorna Bissell
THAT the response of the City of Scarborough to the Authority's request for comment on the potential
disposal of certain lands and buildings at the Guild Inn to the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be
referred to the Commissioner of Parks and Culture, Metropolitan Toronto for comment. . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Late in 1995, the Executive Committee approved Resolution #E183/95:
THA T the potential disposal of certain lands and buildings at the Guild Inn, in the City of Scarborough,
to the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, be referred to Authority staff for review, in accordance
with established Authority policies;
AND FURTHER that a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date,
recommending further action.
The Authoritys policy requires that the area municipality and region where lands being considered for
disposal are located, be asked if they have any interest in the property. Accordingly, staff wrote to the
City of Scarborough on February 22, 1996, seeking comments on the potential disposal of these lands.
The attached correspondence from the Mayor of Scarborough was received by the Authority at its
meeting of May 28, 1996.
ANALYSIS
The potential disposal of these lands is at the very early stage in the Authority's process for disposal,
circulation to local and regional municipalities. The next stage involves communicating the potential
disposal to the public including advertising and public information meetings.
The City of Scarborough in their response is suggesting a grant-in-lieu to the City in the amount of the
City's portion of the property taxes. According to Scarborough, this procedure is available under
existing legislation. Metro's taxes would be about $36,000 instead of $200,000 according to the
proposal. The Scarborough letter does not indicate any interest in purchasing the lands if they are
disposed of.
B274 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
Staff recommends that the City of Scarborough's proposal be referred to the Metropolitan Toronto
Commissioner of Parks and Culture for comment. Also, staff has received from the Authority"s
solicitors, Gardiner, Roberts, a legal opinion which may offer an additional opportunity to resolve the
property tax issue. Staff has conveyed this information to the Commissioner for review by the Metro
Toronto legal department.
Staff will report to the Executive Committee on the proposed disposal following these consultations.
Report prepared by:
Jim Dillane, extension 220
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12. 1996 8275
guild inn
ODE/-::;> t::/?#Ej4''''I7t~
~ECEiVED eTY OF SC."RBOROUGH
Frank Faubert MAY 1 7 1996 /5
Mayor Cblet Admmlsttatllr's Office 150 Borough Dnve
Scarborough. Ontano
Canada I~ 1 P 4N7
May 13, 1996
Teleonone (41S) 396-7'222
Fax (41S)396-428S
- Mr. 1. Cralg Mather. P.Eng
Clnef Admuustranve Office
The Metropolitan Toronto and RegIon Conservation Authonty
5 Shoreham Dnve
Downsview,Omano
M3N 1$4
Dear Y1r. Mather:
Re: The :YIetropolitllD Toronto and RegIon Conservanon Authority (MTRCA) Request for
Convey:mce of the Guild Inn to The :YIunicipality of:YIerropoliun Toronto
I am wrnmg In response to your letter to me dated February::':. 1996. I apologIZe for the delay in
responding to you on thIs maner. but In light of the slgmfic:mce of your request I felt that It was
best to bring thJs maner before Scarborough City COunCll for Its full consideratIon.
I can apprecJ:IIe the reason for your request. In these econOmIC nmes. munIcipal bodies :n all
levels must make extr:1Ordinary effortS In order to keep thell' spending WIthin eXlStlDg budget
levels. The City of Scarborough. perhaps more than any other :VIeIro-area munIcipality. IS acutely
aware of thIs need and has consIstently acted with fiscal respOnsibility
As you know. the sale of the Gwld Inn to Metro will be the first step in a process wluch WIll
ultlmately exempt the property from the assessment of muruclpal proper!}' ta.,,<es. I understand that
the total property ta.,,<es wluch are currently payable In respect of the Guild Inn are approXllDately
$200,000.00 per year. Of t1us amount, the largest pornon is payabie to the school board and the
remamder appornoned between Yletro and Scarborough in accordance WIth thell' standard mill rate
percentages. I have been adVised by my staff that Sc:::borough' s share of tlus amount IS
approximately $36,000.00 on an annual basis.
Since the proposed sale will ultImately result In a loss oftlus revenue to Scarborough. City Council
feels that it cannot endorse it without qualification. The City SImply cannot afford to lose t1us
many tax dollars wluch relate to what IS, essentially a commercial opel'3Ilon. Of further concern is
the fact that the Gwld Inn competes with other commercial establishments within the City of
Scarborough wluch WIll connnue to be reqwred to pay property ta.,,<es. If the Guild Inn IS
completely exempted from t1us obligatlon, there is a concern that these establishments will be
placed at a compentlve disadvantage wluch could ultunately result In some of these businesses
becommg unvlable. TIns would result In the loss of funher ta."< dollars to the City, as well as to
Metro
As I have stated, the City is sympathenc to Metro's desire to limn the amount of property taxes
@ P"IDft1:DOMI':UU:COHW"'CIHCMSTCO'fSl.,\4D'itlCYCUDFIIJIU
B276 .EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
Guild inn attachment
Page ::!
May 13. 1996
Mr. 1. Craig Mather, P. Eng.
which it must pay in respect of the Guild Inn. It IS for this reason thaI City Council is proposing a
compromise solution which will address the majority of Metro 's concerns in this respect. while:It
the same time ensuring thaI the City of Scarborough is not financially prejudiced by such a sale.
r have been advised by the City's Legal Depanmem that, when Metro acquires parkland. Section
'2:17 of the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Act permits Metro to agree to pay an annual sum
of money to the City in lieu of property taxes which would otherwise be payable in respect of the
property. This provision recognizes the financial detriment which accrues to a local municipality
when Metro acquires parkland. thereby removing a taxable property from the municipal assessment
inventory. This provision for payment also recognizes the fact that a property will continue to
require, and benefit from, local municipal services such as fire depanment response. garbage
collection. road maintenance and other services which are of general benefit to properties within
the City. I have been advised that there is no similar "payment in lieu" section with respect to the
school boards. presumably because property acquired by Metro for?art PUl1'oses will not continue
to place similar burdens on the services offered by those bodies.
Metro's legal staff may be of the opinion that Section 2:7 of the Yletro .-\ct does not apply to the
sale of the Guild Inn if they are of the opinion that the Inn is not, strictly speaking, a public park or
recreation area. However, even if this is the c:lSe. an amendment to the .-\ct will very simply
address this technical concern. In either c:lSe. the intent of Section ::7 would appear to be invoked
to an even greater degree where the property which is being exempted from assessment has a
commercial component and is not merely open parkland. r am sure that the City's legal staff can
work with the yletro counterpartS to come up with a technical resolution ifyletro feeis that this is
necessary .
To summarize, the City of Scarborough Council is prepared to endorse the proposed ;ale of the
Guild inn to Metro if Metro will agree to pay to the City an annual amount in order to compensate
it for the City's portion of the lost property taxes. If Metro accepts this proposal, the end result
will be to reduce the annual payments in respect of the Guild Inn from approximately $200,000.00
(current property taxes) to approximately $36,000.00 (payment in lieu of taxes to the City). The
City's Council feels that this is a very fair and constructive proposal which greatly benefits Metro
without prejudicing the financial interests of the City of Scarborough.
Frank Faubert
MAYOR
Isf
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B277
RES #BB5/96- FORMER CANADA POST CORPORATION PROPERTY I CITY OF
MISSISSAUGA
Update on status of interim property management issues, including rental
arrangement with Ontario Hydro, for the use of 1352 Lakeshore Road, East,
Mississauga and other issues related to taxation and demolition matters.
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the staff report dated 1996.06.28 on rental arrangements with Ontario Hydro, taxation and
demolition matters at the former Canada Post site, be received. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The subject Authority holding consists of Part of Lot 5, Concession 3.S.D., City of Mississauga,
Regional Municipality of Peel, acquired from Canada Post on October 30, 1992.
ONTARIO HYDRO LEASE
At the time of acquisition, there was an existing lease with Ontario Hydro for the use of approximately
24,000 square feet of the office warehouse building, situate at the west entrance to the property from
Lakeshore Road, East for a training facility. A small area of the building is being leased at nominal rent
by C.O.P.S., a community youth group, sponsored by Peel Regional Police.
The lease with Ontario Hydro in effect at the time of purchase, provided for a 5 year term which
expired on June 30, 1995. This lease protects the interest of the Authority and provides for Ontario
Hydro to remain on the property on a month to month basis at the existing rental rate of $85,680 per
year. In addition, the tenant pays for utilities, regular maintenance and taxes. All funds collected from
this rental are being applied to the development of the future park. The annual taxes on this portion of
the rental is approximately $12,000.00.
Under Resolution #E50/95, the Members of the Executive Committee received a status report on the
rental negotiation and directed staff to report further to the Executive Committee concerning this
matter. At the time of the report, staff brought to the attention of the Members of the Authority, that
difficulties were being encountered in renegotiating any rental arrangement at similar rent. While the
entire hydro staff at this location have been most cooperative and expeditious in accommodating
Authority concerns, Ontario Hydro head office representatives have indicated that the costs per square
foot for leasing office space has decreased since the lease was first negotiated. Arrangements have
now been concluded and Ontario Hydro is prepared to continue leasing the property on a year to year
basis at the existing rental rate, upon confirmation that 1 year notice of termination will be provided by
the Authority.
B278 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
Certain repairs to the boiler system were noted in the earlier report, with the Authority being authorized
to pay up to $30,000.00 to carry out the required work. This work was carried out during late 1995,
within the approved expenditure amount.
In 1992, as part of the interim management of the Canada Post property, the property with the
exception of the land leased to Ontario Hydro was turned over to The Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto, to obtain a tax exemption under The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Act. The regional
assessment commissioner has taken the position that since the lands are not presently being used for
park purposes, they are not eligible for tax exemption. Authority staff in conjunction with Metro staff
and Mississauga staff are still negotiating with the Regional Assessment Commissioner.
In December, 1994, the Authority awarded a contract to Teperman and Sons Inc. for demolition of
certain buildings on the Canada Post site. Teperman did not fulfil the terms of the contract by not
providing a letter of credit. As a result the Authority initiated legal action against Teperman and Sons
Inc., Marvin Teperman and Steven A. Teperman, for breach of contract. The additional cost to the
Authority from accepting the next lowest contract plus the Authority's out of pocket costs were
$95,000. Negotiations were held with Teperman through the Province's Alternative Dispute Resolution
System. However, Teperman was only willing to offer $10,000. Since the serving of the statement of
claim, Teperman and Sons Inc. have gone into receivership but the principals of the firm have been
served personally.
Report prepared by:
Lori Colussi, Extension 303
For further information contact:
Don Prince, extension 221
Lori Colussi, extension 303
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B279
RES #886/96- WESTSIDE HOLDINGS LTD.
Request by Westside Holdings Ltd. to obtain an agreement with the Authority for
a long term renewal of a permit to place fill in a regulated area.
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THA T WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has received a request
from Westside Holdings Ltd. for a long term renewal for Permit #C-93083;
AND WHEREAS The Executive Committee considers that a renewal of the permit for a period of 20
years is in compliance with the goals of the Authority regulation as set out in section 28 of the
Conservation Authorities Act and Ontario Regulation 158;
THAT Westside Holdings Ltd. be granted a renewal of Permit C-93083 for a period of 20 years based
on the draft agreement attached;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority staff be authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give effect thereto. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Executive Committee Meeting #4/93, Westside Holdings Ltd. obtained a permit pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 to undertake regrading in a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River in order to facilitate the
development of the Forest Lawn Mausoleum, located at 57 Linelle Street in the City of North York.
Specifically the permit allowed for the construction of an access road within the Fill Regulated Area as
well as a sanitary sewer hookup to a trunk sewer. This permit has been renewed twice and is currently
valid until June 1997. Work on this project has not yet commenced as the proponent is still building an
addition to the existing mausoleum on the adjacent property (in an area not regulated by Ontario
Regulation 158). Construction of Phase 1 of the new structure is anticipated within the next five
years.
In 1994, the agent for the applicant, Ms. Lynda Kaye of the Planning Management Group (PMGI
initiated discussions with staff with regard to issuance of a long term approval for the works outlined in
the permit. A copy of her correspondence outlining the rationale for this request is attached.
Staff have estimated the cost of permit renewals on an annual basis to be $600.00 based on the
current fee schedule.
The works complied with Authority policy in place at the time of the original application (the 1980
Watershed Plan). As the applicant has obtained an agreement with the City of North York on similar
terms for the issuance of a building permit, staff are of the opinion that the renewal of the permit
based on the attached draft agreement will allow for adequate safeguards to ensure that future phases
of the development continue to address the Authority's interests.
For information contact:
Richard Lloyd, Ext. 281
8280 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
PMG
Plannll'1q
Ie CoJnSUlranfS
May 31, 1994 n ..- Project No. 1320-8 .s. En91n""
\,c. I'U ~5 Brldqollnu ~'l,.tnljl:f
'!... . ~ Taronto. ~.an.a<s \16":' _
~'
\0'J 7'.t. "t8l "Q7,"9J5
Metropolitan Toronto .sc Region Fax. :"6) :97")00,,"
Conservation Authority \
5 5horeham Drive . ... -
Downsview, Ontario ! .,..~."';:.::a'\'
M3N 154 i t:.":' .:=oJ ~J 'J ____ prng
l \
Attention: Ms. Renee Jarrett JUN 1 11794
Dear Ms. Garrett: P!..A~J ?::'/!~':I :~':7:GN
M.-l.:.....
RE: WESTSIDE CEMETERIES LIMITED
MAUSOLEUM DEVELOPMENT
57 UNELLE STREET, NORTH YORK
PERMIT APPLICATION NO. C-93D83
On behalf of Westside Cemeteries Limited. we are writing ~o request a
renewal of the above-referenced ;;lermit which is due :01' renewal on June 11.
1994.
It is our understandinli, from my ~revious conversations with you and your
staff, that the subjec~ permit must be renewed yearly until construction of
the building is completed.
As we have discussed. mausoleum buildings are distinct and different from
other forms of development in that their construction ;lhase spans over
many, many years. Construction of the mausoleum occurs in small
incremental stalies. with construc~ion only ~roceeding ~o the next stage once
75% of the crypts in the ~revious stage have been sold. De~ending on the
supply and demand for crypt space, construction can be continuous from one
stage to the next, or it can stop for a short period of time between stages.
Likewise, the grading and construction of the driveway located at the south
end of the mausoleum building, which is located within the 10-metre setback
from the top of bank, would also be constructed in stages to correspond to
the westerly expansion of the mausoleum building.
Completion of construction of the mausoleum building and the driveway may
not occur until at least 15 to 20 years fOllowing commencement of
construction. Therefore, annual. renewals of the permit could prove to be a
nuisance to the Authority as well as our client. In view oC the lengthy
eonstruction period Cor a mausoleum building, we are requesting that the
COllSel"Vation Authority give consideration to a long-term renewal period Cor
the subject permit application.
Our client's interests are:
a) to reduce the frequency of ~ermit renewals required over the
long construction ;:1eriod; and
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 8281
Metropolitan Toronto clc Region Project No. 1320-8
Conservation Authority
May 31, 1994
Page 2
b) to ensure that the proposed development as presently approved
(including construction of the storm sewer connection and the prng
southerly driveway located within the 10-metl'e setback f!'Om
the top of bank) will continue to be eligible for permit renewal
and approval, provided stable slope conditions ll!'e maintained.
I have attached a plan which shows the mausoleum development divided into
thI'ee major consttuction phases. As discussed, it may be appropriate to
require permit renewals prior to each major construction phase.
In the event that the details pertaining to the above timetable for renewals
cannot be resolved prior to the June 11th renewal date, then, we would
respectfully request that consideration be given at this time to granting a
five-yell!' renewal. with the details of subsequent renewals to be worked out
at a later date.
Should you have any questions 01' require additional information. please do
not ~esitate to contact me.
Yours very truly,
PMG Planni~ Consultants clc Engineers
,~~d,~ " J1cy-i-
Y
Lynda J. Kaye
Senior Planner
LJK/am
Ene!.
ee: R. Lloyd
C. Mathers
L. Law
,-C4t~ t t ). v c, <..2~ ~ c(
8282 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
THIS AGREEMENT lIIlIde as oftM _ day of ~ 1996.
BETWEEN:
WESTSIDE CEMETERY HOLDINGS LIMITED
(hereinafter called "Westside')
OF THE FIRST PART
. and.
THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORl1'Y
(hereinafter called "the MTRCA ")
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS Westside is the registered owner of cenain lands in the City of Nonh
York. in the Municipality of Toronto being legally described in Schedule" A" 31lIII:hed hereto (the
"Westside Development Site");
AND WHEREAS Westside proposes 10 develop the Westside Development site
for cemetery purposes with 3SSOciated servicing facilities including a driveway and stonn water
drainage system (the "\1ausoleum ServIces");
AND WHEREAS it is intended that the Mausoleum Services will be constrUcted
on a phased basIS over an estimated time frume of twenty (20\ years:
AND WHEREAS in order to proceed with the Mausoleum Services Westslde has
applied for and received (rom the MTRCA Pennit No. C.93083 which provides tbr the
placement of fill and constrUction of draInage facilities on the Wests.de Development Site and
adjacent lands:
AND WHEREAS the panies to Ihis agreement desire to sellle cenain mallers
related to the renewal of the \1TRCA pennil.
NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration
of the sum of TWO DOLLARS paid by each pany to the other. the mutual covenants and
premises hereinafter set fonh and other good and valuable consideration (the receIpt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged) the panies agree as follows:
1.0 Definitions:
1.1 In this Agreement the following tenns shall have the following meanings:
(a) "Approved Plans" means the plans and drawings listed in Schedule "B" atlached
hereto;
(b\ "Business Day" means any day of the week other than Saturday. Sunday or any
statutory holiday in the Province of Onlano:
(c) "Final Completion" means completion of construclion of all services. structures
and facilities associated with the Mausoleum Services in accordance with the
MTRCA Pennit;
(d) "MTRCA Pennit" means Pennit Number C.93083 issued by the MTRCA to
Westside in cOMection with the Mausoleum Services. a trUe copy of which is
attached hereto as Schedule "C".
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 8283
.2.
2.0 Tenn of MTRCA Pennit:
2.01 West5ide and the MTRCA hereby acknowledge and agree that subject to compliance with
the following conditions. the MTRCA Pennit shall be maintained in good standing.
without funher application or payment of fees by We3tside. pending Final Complellon of
all phases of construction of the Mausoleum Service3 for a tenn of twenty (20) years
following the date of last renewal of Ihe permit provided that:
(a) all placement of fill and installation of all works and facilitie3 pursuant to the
MTRCA Pennit shall be carried out in accordance with the Approved Plans; and
(b) prior 10 the commencement of construction of each phase of the Mausoleum
Service3 Westside shall provide the MTRCA with not less than thirty (30) days
wrinen nolice thereof. delivered by personal servIce or ~istered mail. provided
that if Westside proposes any changes to the Approved Plans then not less than
sixty (60) days wrinen notice shall be provIded.
2.02 In the event that. in lhe opinion of lhe MTRCA aCling reasonably, lhere is a material
adverse change in lhe site conditions such lhat the work 10 be done in accordance with
the Approved Plans is inadvisable. the MTRCA may give wrinen no lice revoking lhe
pennit. For lhe PUf1lO5e of this Agreement. "malenal adverse change" shall mean any
change of condition or circumstances which substanllally affects regulallon of flooding,
pollution or conservallon of land upon the WeslSide Development Site.
3.0 Constnlction in Accordance with 'v\TRCA Permit:
3.01 West5ide acknowledges and agrees that none of the proVISions of this Agreement shall
have lhe offecl nf relieving Westside from lhe responsibililY of perfonning all work
provided for under the MTRCA Pennlt '" accordance wuh lhe Approved Plans.
3.02 In lhe eventlhat '.VeslSlde proposes 10 amend lhe -\pproved Plans then It shall promptly
nOllfy the MTRC.-\ In writing of lhe proposed amendments and the Secretary. Treasurer
of the MTRCA shall. aCllng reasonably, detemune whelher the proposed amendments are
such that a new applicallon for pennu 10 allow the placemenl of fill or constrUCllon of
drainage factlities on the Westside Development Site shall be requIred. WeslSide agrees
Ihat if it is delennined by lhe Secretary. Treasurer thaI a new application for pennit IS
required lhen it shall be responsible for any and all COSIS for permit fees and cOSls for
preparing any and all documents in connection lherewuh. Westside fun her acknowledges
and agrees that an)' new application for permit providing for lhe placement of fill andlor
construction of drainage facilities shall be reviewed by the ~ITRCA in accordance wilh
all applicable statutes. regulations and policies then in effect.
3.03 Notwithstanding sections 3.01 and 3.02 herein. Westside shall be entitled to proceed with
the placement of fill and construction of the drainage facilities provided for under lhe
Approved Plans on an incremental basis as Ihe phased construction of the Mausoleum
Services are proceeded with. provided Ihat any grading or drainage issues resulting
therefrom are resolved 10 the satisfaction of the MTRCA. acting reasonably
.4.0 Miscellaneous:
4.1 The panies hereto agree that the information contained in the Schedule3 annexed hereto
shall be of the same force and effect as if the same had been contained in the body of this
Agreement.
4.2 Any notice. waiver or request to be given in connection with Ihis Agreement shall be in
writing, shall be given by personal delivery or by registered mail. Any such notice.
waiver or request is to be addressed to lhe recipient as follows:
8284 EXECUTIVE'COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
- 3 -
(a) Westside at:
WeslSide Holdings Limited
clo Westside Cemeteries Ltd.
1567 Royal York Road
Toronto. Onrario
M9P 3C4
Attention:
(b) MTRCA aI:
the Metropolilan and Toronto Region Conservation Authority
5 Shoreham Dri ve
Downsvicw. Onrario
M3N IS4
AlIention: Sccrclllly- Treasurer
Any notice delivered 35 aforesaid or shall be deemed to have been delivered on the date
of delivery if delivered or received during normal business hour.; and otherwise the ne.t
following Busincss Day Either pany may from time to time in the manner aforesa.d
provide the other pany with any change of address for the purposes of notice hereunder.
Any notice. requcst or demand herein provided for or given hereunder shall be sumcleOlly
given if mailed or delivered to lhe solicitor.; for the Parttcs.
4.3 Time shall in all rcspcelS be of the essence hereof provided that lhe time for dOing or
completing oi any maller provided for herein may be eXlended or abridged by an
agreement in wrillng signed by the WeslSide and the \1TRCA or by their rcspecllve
solicitors who are hereby expressly appoinled in Ihis regard.
4.4 Provided lhat WeslSide shall maintain Ihis Agreement in good standing then upon a
conveyance assignment t)r other transfer of the Westside Lands to ;) third. pony the
MTRCA undenakes to enter inlo a new pen"'t agreement with such third party In
accordance wuh Ihe Approved Plans and incorporaung the same terms and condiuons 35
set fonh herein.
4.5 This Agreement shall be read with all changcs of gender or number required by the
context.
4.6 If any provision of this Agreement or panion Ihereof or the applicalion thereof to the
per.;on or circumstances shall 10 any eXlent be invalid or unenforceable. the remainder oi
this Agreement or the application of such provision or ponion lhereof to any other person
or circumstance shall not be affected thereby. and the Parties hereto will negoliate in good
faith to amend lhis Agreement to implement the inlenlions set fonh herein.
IN WlTNESS WHEREOF the Panies hereunto affixed their corporate seals. allested by
the hands of Iheir proper officer.; in that behalf duly authorized.
WESTS IDE CEMETERY HOLDINGS
LIMITED
Per:
THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND
REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
Per:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 8285
.
SCHEDULE" A"
Leilal Descriotion of the Lands
All and certain those lands and premises located in the City of North York in the Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto comprising Part of Lot 13, Concession I, West of Yonge Street and
designated as Parts I, 2, 5, 8, 9, 10 and lion Plan 64-14069 deposited in the Land Registry
Office for the Registry Division of Metropolitan Toronto (No.64).
B286 ~XECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
SCHEDULE "8"
List of Aomoved DrawinllS
1. Plans, prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd; Project No. 92972; Drawing No.1;
dated January 1993.
2. Cross-sections; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.; Project No. 92972; dated
May 19, 1993.
3. Landscape Plan; prepared by John H. Day Consultants Ltd.; dated June 1, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B287
RES #BB7/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is
required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on
a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules
whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from
some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation
of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by: Lorna Bissell
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THA T permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (7.4.1 -
7.4.13.) which are listed below. ............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
(7 4 1) Cit',l....OLMissisga
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 13, Concession 8 SD, (Mimico Creek, north of Morningstar
Dnve), in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to construct erosion control work at two eroded sections of the river bank along the
Mimico Creek.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998 in accordance with the fOllOWing
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Mimico Creek, Upstream of Morning Star Site Plan; prepared by Harrington and Hoyle Ltd.;
Project 96-10; received June 18, 1996 (Total Drawings 1)
(2) Mimico Creek Restoration Slope Cross Section; submitted by applicant; received June 18,
1996. (Total Drawings 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
&op.o.sal :
The applicant proposes to conduct erosion control work at two eroded sections of the river bank of the
Mimico Creek. The works are required to protect an existing trail and light standards adjacent to the
watercourse. The works involve the placement of brush mattresses and live fascines plantings on two
30 metre sections of the river bank to stabilize toe erosion. Additionally, plantings will be conducted to
further stabilize the river bank.
8288 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
There will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Pnlllltinn'
The applicant will use a coffer dam and pump around the work area.
Cnn!':Rrvatinn nf I ann'
The plantings proposed to stabilize the riverbanks will also create riparian cover adjacent to the channel
of the watercourse.
Pnlicy C::llinRlinR!':'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program. These works were deemed emergency works due to the
undermining of an adjacent pathway and were undertaken by City staff in May.
CFN: 27891 Appl. #:054/96/M ISS
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.04.22.
(7 4 7) ThR Bnard nf TranR nf Mp.trnpnlitan Tnrnntn
To place fill within a regulated area on part Lot 8, Concession 9, (70 Lloyd Street), in the City
of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to regrade in order to make improvements to the existing driving range within the Fill
Regulated Area of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1 996 to July 11, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Grading and Drainage Plan; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather Ltd.; Project 9376G; Sheet
SD2; received on April 29, 1996. (Total Drawings1)
(2) Plan View Cross-section Location Plots Plans; prepared by Bruce S. Evans Ltd; Drawings 1, 2,
3.4, 5. and 6; received June 20, 1996.(Total Drawings 6)
(3) Letter of Intent regarding P1antings and Planting Detail; prepared by Cory Janzen of The Board
of Trade; dated June 6, 1996; received June 20, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
The applicant proposes to regrade a manicured section of the existing golf course which is currently
utilized as a driving range. The works are within the Fill Regulated Area. The specifics of the proposed
driving range improvements include a balanced cut and fill operation which will result in the movement
of approximately 40,000 cubic metres of fill. Of this, approximately 35,000 cubic metres will be used
to regrade the existing manicured valley slope. A new naturalized slope will be created and will be
planted and seeded to become an out of play area. The existing slope had previously been altered
through regrading required for the golf course construction and maintenance.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B289
Pnlllltinn'
Sediment fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the work area. In addition, all drainage from the
work area will be directed towards an existing pond which will serve as a sediment basin during
construction. At the conclusion of the regrading the pond will be cleaned and utilized as a part of the
existing golf course.
Cnn!':Rrv;:!tinn nf L;:!nd:.
The proposal provides an opportunity to regenerate a section of the valley with native woody
vegetation where none currently exists. The applicant has provided a detailed planting plan which
confirms their commitment to have a new naturalized slope which would be an out of play area.
Pnlicy C::llidRlines:
The works are an improvement to an existing resource based use and are in compliance with Section
4.3 Existing Resource Based Uses within the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor management
Program.
CFN: 27924 076/96N AUG
For information contact: Russel White, Ext. 306
Date: 1996.06.24.
(7 4~) M;:!rin Mir;:!belli
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Lot 9, Registered Plan
M-1114, (15 Birch Hill Road - Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as
located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material for minor lot grading and to construct a single family dwelling
within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans, prepared by Ben Piel Architectural Drafting Services; Project 95-111; Drawings A 1, A2,
A3, A4, A5 and A6 Revision 1 dated April 19, 1996; received April 30/96. (Total Drawings 5)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':;:!I:
The proposal consists of placing fill for minor lot grading and construction of a single family dwelling.
The property is located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber
River, (East Branch) and the Woodbridge Special Policy Area (SPA).
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The perimeter of the building envelope is subject to minimal flood depths under Regional Storm
conditions. Grading to meet Building Code requirements will have the effect of flood proofing the
structure to above the level of the Regional Storm, which is in accordance with the requirements of the
Woodbridge SPA.
Pnlllltinn'
No sedimentation within the watercourse is expected as the site is located 185 metres from the East
Humber River.
B290 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
Cnn!':Rrvatinn nf I and'
The filled and disturbed areas around the building foundation will be topsoiled and sodded following
construction.
Ea.lky C::llinRlinA!':'
The proposal is in compliance with the Woodbridge SPA (Vaughan Official Plan Amendment 440) and
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section 4.2.1 - Development in
Established Communities.
CFN: 27955 Application: 081 196/V AUG
For Information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date:1996.06.21.
(7 4 4) City nf Vallghan - FnginARring [)epartmRnt
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 5, Concession 3, (between Highway 7 and Hillside Avenue,
east of Keele Street, Concord), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on
property owned by same and Enzo & Maria Bianchi.
The purpose is to alter a waterway by replacing a portion of failed terrafix block channel with field
boulders and river-run stone within a tributary of the West Don River.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by the City of Vaughan, Engineering Department; Drawings 1 and 2 dated June
1996; received June 27,1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':al:
The proposal consists of replacing a portion of failed terrafix block channel with round field boulders
and river-run stone. Only the section of channel bottom spanning the width of the property at 20
Hillside Avenue (ie. 35 metre length) will receive the boulder and stone material treatment. A further
15 metres downstream will be cleared of the scattered terrafix blocks; existing in-stream strata at this
location is presently providing good aquatic habitat. The owners of 20 Hillside Avenue have provided
written authorization to gain access to the work site. The construction area is situated within the
Regional Storm flood plain and the Fill Regulated Area.
Cnntrol nf Flnnning'
The proposed works will not affect the control of flooding; the hydraulic capacity of the channel will
not be altered. There will be no fill placement on the streambanks or adjacent properties.
Pnlhltinn'
The construction area will be isolated by coffer dams at the upstream and downstream ends of the
proposed channel works, with streamflow pumped around the site. The in-stream work zone will be
dewatered, with pumped flow directed through filter fabric bags which will be encircled by silt fencing.
All in-stream work will be performed manually; no construction equipment will enter the watercourse.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B291
Cnn!':Rrvatinn nf I ann'
The proposed in-stream material will be of sufficient size ie. 300 mm to 450 mm to withstand the high
velocity of flow (2.5 to 4 metres per second) under bankfull conditions. The boulders and stones will be
arranged to provide energy dissipation as well as pools and riffles to enhance aquatic habitat. Although
the streambanks will not be impacted by the proposed works, the owners of 20 Hillside Avenue (Enzo
and Maria Bianchi) have agreed to plant native, low growth shrubs to enhance the understorey area of
the sparsely vegetated riparian zone at this location.
Pnlicy C::llinRlinR!':'
The proposal is consistent with Section 3.3 - Policies and Procedures for Identifying Watercourses and
Alterations - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27371 Application #: 154/95N AUG
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.06.27. - - ~. . -' -
(7 4 5) Davirl KRmp!':tp.r
To place fill in a regulated area on Lot 12, Registered Plan 4177, (72 Westhead Road,
Alderwood), in the City of Etobicoke, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to place fill material in conjunction with the replacement of a 0.4 metre high retaining
wall, within the Fill Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan; prepared by the applicant: Figure #2; received May 30, 1996. (Total Drawings 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':~I:
The applicant proposes to place fill material as part of the reconstruction of an existing 0.4 metre high,
wooden retaining wall in the rear yard of the property. Fill will be placed behind the new wall and also
extend towards the rear of the house in order to level some shallow depressions on the backyard lawn
area. The majority of the subject lands are located within the Fill Regulated Area which surrounds the
Etobicoke Creek valley. The application has been submitted to resolve an existing violation under
Ontario Regulation 158 (Files: V-1546 and V-1547).
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The entire property is situated above the Regional Storm flood plain of the Etobicoke Creek.
Pnlllltinn'
No sedimentation is anticipated as part of the works.
Cnn!':Rrvatinn nf I ~nn'
The replacement retaining wall is coincident with the top-of-bank of the Etobicoke Creek valley. Staff
has examined the site and confirm that the valley slope is extensively vegetated with no visible signs of
erosion. The proposal will not impact stability on adjacent lands (or the valley slope) and is consistent
with existing minor property improvements along this reach of the Etobicoke Creek valley corridor.
B292 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
Pnlicy C::llinRlinR!':'
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28009 Application #: 105/96/ETOB
For information contact: George Leja (Ext. 342)
Date: 1996.06.25
(7 4 6) Marklann Wnnd Cnllntry Clllb
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 6, Concession 5, (245 Markland Drive), in the City of
Etobicoke, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 3.0 metre high chain-link fence within the Regional Storm flood pl,ain of
the Etobicoke Creek.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1 996 to July 11, 1 998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plans and Chain-link Fence Detail/Cross-section Drawing; submitted by Mr. Robert
Ackermann, Golf Course Superintendent; Markland Wood Country Club; received February 1,
1996. (Total Plans 3)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':al:
The proposal consists of the construction of a 3.0 metre high chain-link fence for security and safety
reasons (i.e. restrict trespassers and prevent golf balls from entering Bloor Street and adjacent private
lands). The new fence will run parallel to Bloor Street, along the south side of the road and east of the
Etobicoke Creek. The fence will then be constructed along the common property boundary at the rear
of existing condominium lands fronting on Markland Drive. Approximately two-thirds of the length of
proposed fencing will be located within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Etobicoke Creek.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
No part of the fence will cross the Etobicoke Creek channel and the portion within the flood plain will
be situated outside the hydraulic floodway.
Pnlllltinn'
No sedimentation is anticipated as part of the proposed works.
Cnn!':Rrvatinn nf I ann'
The proposed fence will be located on the valley floor; valley slopes will not be impacted by the
proposed works.
Pnlir.y C::llinRline!':'
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27747 Application 017 196/ETOB
Report prepared by: George Leja, Ext. 342
Date: 1996.06.21.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B293
(7 4 7) Angeln Marinnni
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 4, Registered Plan 184, (13136 Bayview Ave., Lake
Wilcox), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to place up to 0.2 m of fill in the flood plain to alleviate a lot drainage problem.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan and Cross-section Plan showing area of proposed fill, 13136 Bayview Ave.. Richmond
Hill; prepared by applicant; received June 19, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':al:
The applicant is proposing to place up to 0.2 m of topsoil over an existing lawn area 15.25 m by 33.5
m in the rear yard of their residential lot to alleviate flooding caused by lot drainage. The area is in the
flood plain and subject to approximately 1 metre of flooding under Regional Storm conditions. A 3 m
buffer will be maintained between the filled site and the Lake.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The filling is minimal and will have no significant impact on the control of flooding.
Pnlllltinn'
The existing grades rise at the edge of the lake. Because of this feature and the 3 m buffer that will be
maintained, sediment will not enter the lake during the work. As the filling will be done gradually using
a wheel barrow, the area will be seeded as the work proceeds.
Pnlicy GuidelinR!,:'
The work does not affect the Environmental Protection Zone designated for Lake Wilcox through the
Town's OPA 129.
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.2.2 (E) Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures.
CFN: 27950 Application #: 079/96/RH
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, Ext. 304
Date: 1996.06.20.
8294 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
(7 4 H) Mintn CnmmllnitiR!': (Tnrnntn) Inc
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 22, Concession II EYS, (north of Major MacKenzie Road,
west of Leslie Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a storm water qualitylquantity pond to facilitate the construction of
adjacent residential subdivision developments.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 2001 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Storm Water Management Facility, Orchard Pond; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather Ltd.;
Project #94219; Drawings SW1, SW2, and SW3; received June 19, 1996.
(2) SWM Facility Landscape Plan, Minto Communities West Phase; prepared by Landscape
Planning Ltd.; Project #95049; Drawings L-1 and L-2; received June 19, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':al:
The applicant is proposing to construct a storm water management pond to treat storm water for water
quality and control runoff for downstream erosion protection. The pond will be located outside the
valley corridor. Storm water from the pond will be dispersed into the flood plain area outside the
meanderbelt and run as surface flow to the Rouge River.
A portion of a proposed sanitary sewer will be constructed under the pond. As a second phase of this
project the sanitary sewer will be extended along the outfall alignment and under the Rouge River. An
open trench technique will be use for the river crossing. We are working with the applicant and the
Ministry of Natural Resources to finalise the details of the crossing.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
All outfall structures in the flood plain are to be constructed at grade. There will be no impact on the
control of flooding
Pnlllltinn'
The works will be approximately 65 m from the watercourse. All disturbed areas will be stabilised with
seed or mulch mat as soon as the grading is completed. No equipment or machinery will be stored in
the flood plain.
Cnn!':Rrvatinn nf I ::Ind'
A few trees are to be removed to accommodate this pond. The applicant has been working with the
Town of Richmond Hill forester to minimise the impacts. The pond area and disturbed valley corridor
will be planted with native woody vegetation.
Pnlicy C::llinRlinR!':'
The pond is in compliance with the criteria outlined in the Master Environmental Servicing Plan for OPA
121 and the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Plan as it relates to Section 4.3
Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 27705 Application #: 007/96/RH
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, Ext.304
Date: 1996.06.21.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B295
(74 m City of Nnrth York - Pllhlic Work!': nRpartmRnt
To place fill in a regulated area, alter a watercourse and to construct in a flood plain on Part Lot
14, Concession 4 WYS, (Downsview Dells Park), in the City of North York, Humber River
Watershed as located on property owned by same and MTRCA.
The purpose is to place fill material in order to facilitate the reconstruction of three storm sewer
outfalls within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Black Creek.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by the City of North York - Public Works Department; Contract 961-009;
Drawings ST-96, 8-158 and ST-371 dated December 19, 1995; received January 23, 1996.
(Total Drawings 3).
(2) Planting Plans; prepared by the City of North York - Public Works Department; dated April 18,
1996; received April 29, 1996) (Total Drawings 3).
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':al:
The proposal consists of reconstructing three storm sewer outfalls within Downsview Dells Park. The
storm sewers outlet water from the surrounding tableland urban development into watercourse
channels that eventually drain into the Black Creek. Over the years, the concrete head walls have
deteriorated to a point beyond repair. All three outfalls are located within the Fill Regulated Area of the
Black Creek and one encroaches within the Regional Storm flood plain.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
Although one of the proposed outfall structures will protrude into the Regional Storm flood plain, all
grade changes and fill placement will occur above the flood elevation at this site.
Pnlllltinn'
A combination of rock check dams and silt fencing will control sedimentation during construction.
Herbaceous vegetation (ie. cattails) will regenerate within the disturbed outfall channels and provide
treatment of stormwater (ie. uptake of nutrients and contaminants) prior to outletting into the Black
Creek.
Con!,:p.rvatinn nf I ann'
All disturbed areas will be seeded with a rapid soil stabilizer mixture and overtopped with a
biodegradable erosion blanket material for added sedimentation and erosion control. In addition, native
trees and shrubs will be planted throughout the disturbed zones around the new outfalls.
Pnli~y C::llinp.linp.!,:'
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27719 Application #: 010/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja, ext. 342
Date: 1996.06.25.
B296 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
(7 4 1 G)ThA T n I GrOllp
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Part Blocks A and B,
Registered Plan 3991, (2208 Jane Street), in the City of North York, Humber River Watershed
as located on property owned by Centrefund (North York) Corporation.
The purpose is to construct a 50 m2 free-standing drive-thru doughnut shop and undertake associated
minor landscaping works.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998 In accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan; prepared by Tim Hortonsrr.D.L. Group Ltd.; Drawing SP-1; Revision 3 dated May 7,
1996; received May 29, 1996. (Total Drawing 1)
(2) Grading/Servicing Plan; prepared by Tim Hortonsrr.D.L. Group Ltd.; Drawing GP-1; Revision 3
dated May 27, 1996; received May 29, 1996. (Total Drawing 1)
(3) Foundation Plan and Details; prepared by McCavour Engineering Limited; Job 96-2900-41;
Sheet 501; Revision 1 dated May 15, 1996; Received May 21, 1996. (Total Drawing 1)
(4) Exterior Elevations; prepared by Chamberlain Architect Services Limited; Project #96071;
Drawing A3 dated May 15,1996; received May 21, 1996, (Total drawing 1).
(5) Letter regarding structural floodproofing by 5.5. McCavour, P.Eng., President of McCavour
Engineering Ltd. dated May 30, 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn!':al:
To construct a 50 m2 free-standing drive-thru doughnut shop and undertake associated minor
landscaping works in the flood plain and regulated area of the Black Creek. The site is located
immediately east of the Black Creek flood control channel and north of Wilson Avenue within the City
of North York SpeCial Policy Area (Official Plan Amendment #259).
C-nntrnl nf Flnnding'
The proposed structure will be dry flood proofed to above the 350 year storm level in accordance with
the Special Policy Area guidelines. No fill is required in the flood plain for flood proofing purposes.
Pnllutinn'
No sedimentation problems are anticipated due to the nature of the works.
Pnli~y GuidAlinp.!,:'
The proposal is in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development within existing Special Policy Areas and The City of North York Special
Policy Area criteria (OPA 259).
CFN: 27994 Appl.#:96/96/NY
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.06.11.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B297
(7 4 11) IArAmy William!': SlI!':an Morrison and Op.nni!': C-a!':a~do
To alter a watercourse on Lot 43, Registered Plan M-390, (1 and 3 Pine Crescent), in the City
of Toronto, Waterfront Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to uncover a section of a tributary within the City of Toronto.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Cross-Section Details; prepared by Jeremy Williams, Susan Morrison and Dennis Casaccio;
dated June 19, 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
The applicant proposes to uncover a section of a tributary which drains an area of less than 125
hectares within the City of Toronto. The tributary currently flows through a section of pipe within the
rear yard of 1 and 3 Pine Crescent and is open both upstream and downstream of the proposed works.
The applicant will remove the pipes, uncover the stream and renaturalize the rear yard.
C-ontrnl of Flooding'
There will be no impact on the control of flooding. The watercourse drains an area less than 125
hectares and is open both upstream and for a 6 metre section downstream of the site.
C-on!,:p.rvation of I and'
The works will have a positive impact on the entire steam corridor as the creek and adjacent banks will
be returned to a more natural state.
Poli~y GlIidp.linp.!,:'
The works are in accordance with Section 1.3 - the Vision of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28055 Application #: 122/96rrOR
For information contact: Russel White, ext. 306
Date: 1996.06.26.
(7 4 1 ')David and Margarp.t Ma~Millan
To construct in the flood plain on Lot 295, Registered Plan 7566, (109 Fred Varley Drive), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct an addition to an existing house in the flood plain.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Sketch Showing Elevations on Lot 295, Registered Plan 7566, Town of Markham; prepared by
J. Stel O.L.S.; dated June 10, 1996; received June 20, 1996.
(2) MacMillan Residence, 109 Fred Varley Drive; prepared by Fine Line Design; Drawings # A-1,
A-2, A-3; dated June 1996, received June 20, 1996.
B298 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
The applicant is proposing to construct a 22 m2 addition and a 13 m2 deck onto an existing 113 m2
residential structure in the regulatory (100 year) flood plain. The existing lot is in a residential
subdivision and isolated from the watercourse by adjacent development.
C-ontrnl of Flooding'
The structure is at the flood fringe with flood depths of approximately 0.1 m. The existing structure
and new addition will be flood proofed. There will be no measurable impact on the control of flooding.
Polllltion'
There will be no risk to pollution from the proposal.
C-on!,:p.rvation of I and'
There are no significant resource features that will be affected by this work.
Poli~y GlIidp.linp.!,:'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.2.2 (C) Minor Additions.
CFN: 28049 Application #: 121/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, Ext. 304
Date: 1996.06.21.
(7 4 1 ~)Munidpality of Mp.trnpolitan Tornnto - Work!': Dp.partmAnt
To construct in a flood plain and alter a watercourse on Part Lot 13, Concession 1,
(Morningside Park), in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located on
property owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to place rip rap protection around an exposed sanitary trunk sewer in the flood plain,
and to construct stream bank protection to protect an adjacent maintenance road and sanitary sewer
manhole.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Red-line Revision, East Highland Creek Sanitary Trunk Sewer Erosion Protection For
Manhole3/Exposed Pipe; prepared by Metro Works Systems and Services; Drawing #95-770-1;
received April 24, 1996.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B299
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
In order to protect an exposed sanitary trunk sewer in the flood plain and adjacent to the Highland
Creek, Metro Works is proposing to armour both sides of the pipe with rip rap stone. The work will not
be in the watercourse nor will it affect the stream bank.
At a second site, immediately downstream, an existing access road and manhole are threatened by
bank erosion. Metro Works proposes to construct an armourstone wall angled into the stream bank to
deflect erosive flows away.
There is existing access to both the sites.
C-ontrnl of Flooding'
The works will not affect the control of flooding.
Polh Ition'
The placement of rip rap will not result in the creation of suspended sediments.
A portion of the wall construction is to be done from the watercourse. A machine will work from a
stone pad in the water. The work will take approximately two days to complete. Sediment suspension
will be limited because of these construction features and practices.
C-on!,:p.rvation of Land'
No significant resource features will be affected by this work.
Poli~y Gllidp.linp.!,:'
This work is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as it
relates to Section 4.3(D) - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 27947 Application #: 076/96/SCAR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (Ext. 304)
Date: 1996.06.20.
.
B300 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
RES #B88/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is
required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on
a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules
whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from
some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation
of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THA T permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications which are
listed below,(7.4.14 - 7.4.26) excluding 7.4.22 David Baird and 7.4.25 Town of Pickering. . . CARRIED
RES. #889/96- PERMIT 7.4.22
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THA T a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application 7.4.22. David
Baird, which is listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
RES #B90/96 - PERMIT 7.4.25
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application 7.4.25 Town
of Pickering, which is listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B301
(7 4 14)Ri~k Frank and Rarh Taylor
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 27, Concession 2 EHS, (south side of King Street, between
Kennedy Road and Heart Lake Road - Campbell's Cross), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to alter a waterway by removing an existing on-stream pond and reinstating the
previous channel of the Kilmanagh Creek at this location.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998.
(1 ) Letter of Undertaking from Barb Taylor and Rick Frank, dated and received on July 9, 1996.
(Total Documents 1)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
The proposal consists of removing an existing on-stream pond located on the subject lands, reinstating
the previous channel of the Kilmanagh Creek at this location, and expanding the surface area of the
newly created by-pass pond. The intent of this project is to enhance the aquatic habitat for coldwater
species which presently reside in this headwater tributary of the West Humber River. The site is
located within an area that drains greater than 125 hectares upstream of the property. At present,
there is no flood plain mapping which delineates the Regional Storm flood plain for the Kilmanagh
Creek, nor do registered fill lines encompass the valley corridor. However, Fill Regulation Lines are
proposed as part of the on-going Fill Regulation Extension Program.
C-ontrnl of Flooding'
Staff has confirmed that no hydraulic impacts will result from the proposed works, since existing
grades at the work site will be maintained.
Pollution'
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works. A new rock and earth streambank will
sever the on-stream pond from the area of channel to be reinstated.
C-on!,:p.rvation of I and'
All disturbed areas beyond the watercourse channel will be revegetated with a native, groundcover
seed mixture. The newly created streambank will be planted with native, woody vegetation, in
addition to the other disturbed portions of riparian zone. The work area is situated on the valley floor;
no valley slopes will be impacted by the proposed works.
Poli~y Gllidp.linp.!,:'
The proposal complies with Section 3.3 - Policies and Procedures For Identifying Watercourses and
Alterations - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27565 Application: 235/95/CAL
For information contact: George Leja (Ext. 342)
Date: 1996.06.25
B302 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
(7 4 15)C-ity of Rrampton C-ommunity Sp.rvi~p.!,: Dp.partmp.nt
To place fill within a regulated area, alter a watercourse and to construct in a flood plain on
Part Lots 10 and 11, Concession 1 EHS, (south of Bovaird Drive, east of Hurontario Street), in
the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material and alter a watercourse in conjunction with the construction of a
pedestrian trail and underpass beneath the Bovaird Drive (ie. Highway #7) bridge as well as erosion
protection works around an existing pedestrian bridge, within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill
Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998
(1) Plans; prepared by Falby Burnside & Associates Ltd.; Drawings 9518-B-Gl and 9518-B-Dl
Revision 1 dated July 8, 1996; received July 8, 1996; Drawings 9518-B-G2 and 9518-B-G3
dated February 1996; Drawings 9518-B-El Revision 2 dated March 26, 1996; 9518-V-Gl
dated June 1995; received May 27, 1996. (Total Drawings 6)
(2) Letter from Christopher Crozier of Falby Burnside & Associates Ltd.; Project 9518 dated July 8,
1996; received July 9, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
The proposal consists of the construction of a pedestrian trail and underpass beneath the Bovaird Drive
(ie. Highway #7) bridge over the Etobicoke Creek, as well as erosion protection works in the vicinity of
an existing pedestrian bridge within Valleybrook Park East, downstream of the proposed underpass.
The trail underpass is being proposed since it is not feasible to have the trail users cross over the six
lanes of Highway #7 at this location. The construction sites are situated within the Fill Regulated Area
and Regional Storm flood plain of the Etobicoke Creek.
C-ontrnl of Floa.cling..:.
Staff has reviewed a hydraulic analysis prepared by the project consultant and concurs that the
proposed underpass will result in an increase in Regional Storm flood levels by :t 0.3 metres to 0.4
metres for a distance of 700 to 800 metres upstream of the Bovaird Drive bridge. The increased flood
depths will be contained within the valleylands which are owned by the City of Brampton. The City
has submitted a written acknowledgement which indicates an understanding and acceptance of the
increased flood levels resulting from the proposed works.
eauu1ioo.:.
Coffer dams will isolate the in-stream construction areas and the work sites will be dewatered, with
pumped flow directed to filter fabric bags or another comparable method. Silt fencing will impede the
overland migration of construction-generated sediment from other work areas in close proximity to the
Etobicoke Creek.
C-on!,:p.rvation of I and'
All filled and disturbed areas will be revegetated with a native grass seed mixture and the disturbed
portions of riparian zone will be planted with native trees and shrubs. Natural channel enhancement
techniques (to compensate for the loss of fish habitat caused by the proposed underpass) are presently
being reviewed by technical staff.
Poli~y Gllidp.linp.!,:'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(H) - Existing Resource-based Uses - of the Authority's Valley
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B303
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 27842 Application 042/96/BRAM
For information contact: George leja (ext. 342)
Date: June 25, 1996
(7 4 1 fi)Dollgla!': and Annp. I II nail
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 9, Registered
Plan 4068, (79 Plymbridge Road - Hogg's Hollow), in the City of North York, Don River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a new two-storey single family dwelling, a 0.6 metre high concrete wall
with an attached wrought iron fence, replace the existing chain-link fence with a new cedar privacy
fence and place topsoil fill for minor landscaping within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm
flood plain of the West Don River.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998.
(1) Plans; prepared by Harry Christakis Architect Inc.; Project 95060; Drawing A-Ol, Revision 5
dated July 4, 1996; Proposed Cedar Fence Section & Elevation Drawing dated July 4, 1996;
Proposed Stone Veneer Wall Cross-section dated June 24, 1996; received July 5, 1996. (Total
Drawings 3)
(2) Silt Fence Installation Detail; submitted by Harry Christakis Architect Inc.; received July 5,
1996. (Total Drawings 1)
(3) Structural Floodproofing Report; prepared by Hamann Engineering, Structural Consultants dated
May 29, 1996; received May 30, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
(4) Landscape Plans; prepared by Mark Hartley Landscape Architects; Drawings L 1 and l2 dated
April 25, 1996; received June 25, 1996. (Total Drawings 2)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
The proposal consists of the construction of a new two-storey single family dwelling and a 0.6 metre
high concrete wall with an attached wrought iron fence along the south side of an existing swimming
pool and replace the existing chain-link fence with a new cedar privacy fence. The applicant also
proposes to place topsoil for proposed planting beds around the swimming pool in the rear yard of the
property. Only the area from the rear wall of the new dwelling to the south property boundary is
situated within the Regional Storm flood plain of the West Don River and the Hogg's Hollow Special
Policy Area (SPA). The entire property is located within the Fill Regulated Area.
C-ontrnl of Flooding'
A structural analysis has been submitted, detailing that the rear portion of the new house will be dry-
passively flood proofed to the Regional Storm flood level, in accordance with the development criteria
contained in the Hogg's Hollow SPA document. Existing fill material from the proposed planting beds
and excavation from the new concrete wall/fence will be removed from the site. Topsoil will be placed
within the planting bed areas and will match pre-development grades.
B304 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
Polllltion'
Silt fencing will be installed along the rear property boundary to impede the migration of construction-
generated sediment until all disturbed areas have been revegetated/stabilized.
C-on!,:p.rvation of I and'
Existing woody vegetation (ie. trees and shrubs) between the rear lot line and the watercourse will not
be impacted by the proposed works. The site is located on the valley floor; the proposed development
is situated 40 metres from the closest valley slope.
Poli~y Gllidp.linp.!,:'
The proposal complies with the Hogg's Hollow SPA (City of North York Official Plan Amendment #375)
and Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment/lntensification within Established
Communities/Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
CFN: 28059 Application #: 129/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja, ext. 342
Date: 1996.06.26.
(7 4 17)Ma~marmon FOllndation/Rayvip.w C11p.n S~hool
To place fill within a regulated area and construct in a flood plain on 275 Duncan Mill Road, in
the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by The City of
North York.
The purpose is to place fill material for approach ramps and construct a new pedestrian bridge within
the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the Eat Don river.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Eagle Bridge Inc.; Elevation & Plan Details Drawing 1, Typical Bridge Section
Details Drawing 2 and Foundation Details Drawing 3; received July 4, 1996. (Total Drawings 3)
(2) Sediment Control Fence Installation Detail; received July 4, 1996. (Total Drawings 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
The applicant proposes to place fill material for approach ramps for a new pedestrian bridge over tlie
East Don River. The proposed pedestrian bridge will be located on the south side of the Duncan Mill
Road bridge over the river, within the City-owned road allowance. It is required to gain access to a day
camping area on the east side of the watercourse. Written authorization has been received from the
City of North York - Public Works Department with respect to the encroachment within the Fill
Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the East Don River.
C-ontrnl of Flooding'
The proposed pedestrian bridge has been designed as a clear span structure with the footings setback
2.0 metres from the stable river banks. Staff are presently negotiating a reduction in the amount (ie.
depth) of fill material needed for the approach ramps The bridge structure is capable of withstanding
the pressures associated with the Regional Storm flood depth and velocity of flow.
Polhltion'
No in-stream work is necessary for the construction of the pedestrian bridge; silt fencing will encircle
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B305
the footing construction sites.
C-on!,:p.rvation of I and'
The disturbed areas around the bridge footings will be re-sodded and revegetated with native trees and
shrubs.
Poli~y l,llidp.linp.!,:'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(H) - Existing Resource-based Uses of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 28028 Application 117/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.06.25
(74 1 R)Thp. Toronto Tram.it C-ommi!':!':ion
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on Part Lots 15 and 16,
Concession 3 EYS, (Sheppard Ave. at Buchan Court), in the City of North York, Don River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a new culvert on a tributary of the Don River; place fill for the construction
of an extension to an existing parking lot at 1333 Sheppard Avenue; construct an emergency exit
structure and undertake associated regrading and restoration works in the regulated area and flood
plain of the Don River (East Branch.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 2001.
(1 ) Document entitled "Background Report for MTRCA Permit Application", dated May 1996;
prepared by Toronto Transit Commission - Rapid Transit Expansion Program; Design Contract
SH-00-D1; [Sheppard Subway Twin Tunnels]. (Total Drawings 41)
(2) Letter of Undertaking from C. Wheeler, Deputy Project Manager of Facilities Design, Sheppard
Subway; regarding stormwater quality control and restoration plantings; dated June 12, 1996.
(3) Letter of Undertaking from C. Wheeler, Deputy Project Manager of Facilities Design; regarding
redesign of centre cell of the culvert structure; dated July 5, 1996
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
This application is for the construction of the Sheppard Subway Twin Tunnels contract in the vicinity of
Buchan Court, east of Leslie Street. The works include: construction of the subway box structure and
associated regrading; construction of a parking lot extension at the south of the existing parking deck
at 1333 Sheppard Avenue (Medical Arts Building); construction of an emergency exit structure on the
south side of Sheppard Avenue east of Buchan Court; and replacement of an existing single cell 3.3
metre diameter C.S.P. culvert with a triple-cell pre-cast concrete box culvert on a tributary of the Don
River (East Branch).
B306 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
In preparation for this project, Metropolitan Toronto has acquired lands and easements from a number
of landowners along the subway route. Elements of this application required lands from the Authority.
These land transfers were the subject of reports to the Authority in January and February 1996. The
Authority adopted resolutions A307/95 and A332/95 approving the land transfers. This application
represents one of the requirements of the resolutions approving the land transfers.
The works required as part of this contract are extensive and are projected to occur over a four year
period commencing in August or September of this year (1996).
C-ontrnl of Flooding'
The proponent has undertaken an analysis of the hydraulics of the existing and proposed culverts and
determined that no significant changes to existing conditions will result. Staff have reviewed the
analysis and concur with this conclusion.
Polllltion'
The tender drawings include provision for staging various parts of the work over the four year
construction period. Certain elements of the sediment control measures, such as the staging of
replacement of the Buchan Court culvert are specified in the drawings. The tender documents require
that the contractor submit erosion and sediment control plans for approval. This method will allow
some flexibility to the contractor over the term of the project.
C-on!':Arvation of land'
The proposal involves extensive restoration plantings in three areas of valleyland - the north and south
sides of the Buchan Court culvert and the slope behind the new parking deck. Additional street tree
plantings are also proposed. The total restoration plantings include over 1500 shrubs, 160 trees and
some wetland species upstream of the culvert. Staff have reviewed these densities and are satisfied
that they will allow natural regeneration of the areas, (approximately 80 trees will have to be removed
to complete the works).
A geotechnical report has been submitted in support of the parking lot expansion. This report and its
design recommendations have been reviewed by staff and found to be satisfactory. Details of the
retaining wall construction at the south end of the parking area conform to the recommendations of the
report.
Poli~y Gllidp.linp.!,:'
The proposal is in conformance with the route selection outlined in the Environmental Assessment
undertaken for the Sheppard Subway. It is also in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program, Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing. As was the case with the
Don River bridge structure, the Toronto Transit Commission is still in the process of making final
revisions to the design prior to construction. These final revisions, noted in the letter of undertaking,
should be submitted by the beginning of August. Once the final drawings are received the permit will
be issued by staff.
CFN: 28006 Application # 103/96/NY
For information contact: Richard Lloyd, ext. 281
Date: 1996.06.21.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B307
(7 4 1 ~)IPC-F Prnpp.rtip.!,: In~
To construct in a flood plain on Part Block 15, Registered Plan 694-E, (northwest corner of
Jarvis Street and Queens Quay), in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to demolish two existing buildings and construct a new Loblaws supermarket, a parking
complex and gas station within the Regional Storm flood plain and Special Policy Area for the City of
Toronto.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998.
(1) Preliminary Review Drawings, Loblaws; prepared by Rebanks Architects Inc.; Project 9520;
Drawings Aland A2; revised as received May 30, 1996. (Total Drawings 2)
(2) Loblaws - Queens Quay, Elevator Shaft Details; prepared by Rebanks Architects Inc.; Project
9520; Drawings ASK-006, ASK-007 and ASK-008; as received on May 30, 1996. (Total
Drawings 3)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
The applicant proposes to demolish two existing buildings and construct a new Loblaws supermarket, a
parking complex and gas station within the Regional Storm flood plain and Special Policy Area for the
City of Toronto. The new Loblaws building will be flood proofed to the Regional Storm flood plain
elevation of 77.20 m above sea level. The gas station pumps and machinery will also be above the
Regional Storm flood plain elevation. The first level of the parking garage will be subject to flood
depths of less than .5 metres at minimal velocity.
Pollution'
The site is currently developed and bounded by municipal streets. The existing municipal sewer system
will be protected with a rock dam lined with geotextile fabric filter.
C-on!,:p.rvation of I and'
There will be no impact on the conservation of land.
Poli~y Gllidp.lines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2 - Development within Special Policy Areas of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28001 Application #: 101/95rrOR
Report prepared by: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.06.21.
8308 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
(7 4 'O)Angll!': Glp.n Dp.vp.lopmp.nt!': I td
To alter a watercourse on 10060 Kennedy Road, (Angus Glen Golf Course), in the Town of
Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to excavate a stormwater pond and construct an outfall to Bruce's Creek.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 2001.
(1) Letter of Undertaking from Douglas S. McGill of Cosburn Patterson Mather to M. Asselstine of
MTRCA dated July 11, 1996 regarding detailed submissions for the Angus Glen SWM Pond
and redesign of the pond pursuant to the approved Master Environmental Servicing Plan for
Angus Glen.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
In order to facilitate the development of a residential subdivision, the applicant is proposing to
construct a pond for the treatment and control of stormwater for water quality and erosion protection
downstream. The pond is to be located on the tableland adjacent to the Bruce Creek Valley Corridor.
The site is currently part of the rough for the Angus Glen Golf Course. There is a portion of the pond
immediately adjacent to a steep section of the valley slope. The site of the outfall is well vegetated
and the watercourse is actively meandering.
Staff have not received all of the final information for this proposal and are working with the consultant
to complete the review prior to the Executive Committee Meeting.
C-ontrnl of Flooding'
The pond is not in the flood plain and the outlet structure will be at existing grade. There will be no
impacts on the control of flooding.
Polllltion.:.
Sediment fence will be installed between the work site and the watercourse. There will be no
machinery in the watercourse.
C-on!,:p.rvation of I and'
We are currently working with the applicant to address concerns relating to slope stability, disturbance
in the riparian area, and potential erosion at the outfall. We will be requesting that the edge of the
pond is set 10m back from the slope pursuant to the requirements of the Master Environmental
Servicing Plan. An assessment of the existing and long term stability of the slope will be required
including recommendations for design and construction of the pond and outfall. Additional details will
be required for the outfall structure which addresses an erosion sensitive design and location and
careful riparian restoration.
Poli~y Gllidp.lines'
The proposal will be designed and constructed as to meet the requirements of the Master
Environmental Servicing Plan for OPA 19 and the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28020 Application #: 114/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, ext. 304
Date: 1996.06.21
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B309
(74 '1 )Town of Markham
To alter a watercourse near 36 Drakefield Road, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
Watershed as located on property owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to construct a parabolic grate on an existing culvert.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998.
1) Drakefield Road Culvert, Inlet and Outlet Grate and Details; prepared by Mitchell, Pond and
Braddock Ltd.; Drawings 1,2,3 and 4; received June 3, 1996. (Total Drawings 3)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
A small tributary of the Rouge River which drains into Milne Dam pond is culverted for approximately
110m under Drakefield Avenue at Banfield Avenue. There are 5 homes existing in the flood plain at
the upstream end. Historically, these homes have been flooded because of debris accumulating on the
culvert grate. In response to this problem, the Town of Markham has removed the grate and is now
concerned with safety. They are proposing to replace the grate with a parabolic grate which will act to
clear debris away.
C-ontrnl of Flooding'
The parabolic grate is less likely to block from debris and will reduce the inconvenience of frequent
flooding.
Pollution'
The work will be conducted under dry conditions
C-on!,:p.rvation of I and:.
The parabolic grate is designed so that it is not a barrier to fish passage. All disturbed areas will be
restored to existing conditions.
Poli~y Gllidp.linp.!,:'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28026 Application #: 115/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, Ext. 304
Date: 1996.06.24.
B310 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
(7 4 ")David Raird
To place fill within a regulated area on 49 Pine Ridge Drive, Bellamy ravine, in the City of
Scarborough, Waterfront Watershed as located on property owned by Beverly Baird.
The purpose is to place fill to restore an existing slope failure.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998.
(1) Design of Slope Stabilization Works, 49 Pine Ridge Drive: Report prepared by Terraprobe Ltd.;
dated April 22, 1996 and received June 11, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
(2) Redline Revision to Letter of Undertaking from Mr. David E. Baird, dated June 21, 1996
regarding sediment control, site restoration and engineering supervision.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
A 12 m x 35 m section of valley wall along the Bellamy ravine, has failed, threatening a residential
property on the tableland and the drainage channel constructed on the valley floor by MTRCA. The
owner of the property is proposing to restore the valley wall by filling it with clear stone and providing
proper drainage down the slope for storm water.
C.ontrnl of Flood.ing.:
The control of flooding will not be affected.
Polllltion'
A sediment fence will be erected to prevent sediment from entering the channel at the base of the
slope.
c.on!,:p.rvation of I and'
A slope failure assessment report was prepared for this Authority in February 1995 following the failure
in January of that year. The land owner was advised of the risks; however, the Authority was not in a
position to restore the slope at that time. The home owner has elected to undertake the work. The
proposal is in compliance with the recommendations of the slope failure assessment report. Authority
staff have required, through a letter of undertaking, that an engineer be on site during construction to
direct the work.
The disturbed slope adjacent to the work will be restored with native woody species.
Poli~y Gllidp.lines'
Although the works are not sponsored by the Authority, the construction and design is in compliance
with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as it relates to Section 5.2 -
Erosion Control and Slope Stability Remedial Works.
CFN: 28022 Application #: 110/96/SCAR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, Ext. 304
Date: 1996.06.20.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B311
(7 4 '~)Tran!': Northp.rn Pipp.linp.
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 5, Concession 5, (Little Rouge River south of Steeles
Avenue), in the City of Scarborough, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to conduct an open cut pipeline section replacement within the valley corridor of the
Little Rouge River.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998.
(1) Little Rouge Sleeve Replacement Sites proposed construction and mitigation; prepared by
Marshall Macklin Monaghan; Project 1496013-01-106; Figure 1; dated June 25, 1996. (Total
Drawings 1)
(2) 1996 Pipeline Maintenance Program Environmental Statement for water crossing/valley sites;
prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan; dated June 25, 1996. (Total Drawings 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
&aposa1:
The applicant proposes to replace a section of the pipeline, referred to as a sleeve. The sleeve is
located within an established right-of-way which bisects the valley corridor of the Little Rouge River.
To remove and replace the sleeve, a thirty metre section of pipe will be exposed to a width of 1.5
metres. There will be no interference with the watercourse. The site will be restored upon completion
of the sleeve replacement. There will be no impact on the adjacent watercourse.
C.ontrnl of Flooding'
There will be no impact on the control of flooding as the site will be restored to original grades.
Pollution'
Sediment fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the proposed works and between the works and
the watercourse.
c.on!,:p.rvation of I and'
There will be no impact on the conservation of land as the site will be restored to original condition in
accordance with planting details submitted by the applicant.
Poli~y Gllidp.linp.!,:'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28052 Application #: 125/96/SCAR
For information contact: Russel White, ext. 306
Date: 1996.06.24.
B312 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
(7 4 '4)Tran!':-Northp.rn Pipp.linp.!,:
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 1, Concession 5, (Petticoat Creek at the
Pickering/Scarborough Townline), in the City of Scarborough, Petticoat Creek Watershed as
located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to replace a section of an existing buried pipeline which crosses the Petticoat Creek
through the existing Trans-northern Pipeline right-of-way.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998.
(1) 1996 Pipeline Maintenance Program Environmental Statement for Water crossing/valley sites;
prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan; dated June 25, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
(2) Pipeline Maintenance Petticoat Creek Crossing; Figure 2 as provided in 1996 Pipeline
Maintenance Program Report Environmental StatementNalleyland sites; prepared by Marshall
Macklin Monaghan; dated June 26, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!':al:
The applicant proposes to replace a section of pipeline referred to as a sleeve within the Fill Regulated
Area and the Regional Storm flood plain of the Petticoat Creek. In order to access the site of the
pipeline replacement, a temporary stream crossing is proposed at this location. The crossing will allow
for machinery to access the site of the sleeve replacement. The sleeve replacement will be conducted
through the excavation of a 30 metre long by 1.5 metre wide pit. The sleeve will be replaced and the
site restored to original grade.
C.ontrnl of Flooding.:.
There will be no impact on the control of flooding as the site will be restored to original grades.
Polllltion'
The proposed stream crossing will be a dry crossing accomplished through damming the watercourse
and redirecting the flows into a culvert to an area downstream of the crossing location.
c.on!,:p.rvation of I and'
The site will be restored to original condition in accordance with planting and creek rehabilitation
details submitted by the applicant.
Poli~y Gllidp.lines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28053 Application #: 124/96/SCAR
For information contact: Russel White, ext. 306
Date: 1996.06.24.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B313
(74 '5)Town of Pi~kp.ring
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 21, Concession 2, (Finch Avenue and Valleyfarm
Road), in the Town of Pickering, Duffin Creek Watershed as located on property owned by
MTRCA.
The purpose is to construct a new pathway and install photo voltaic lighting within the Regional Storm
flood plain of the Duffins Creek.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998.
(1) Site Plan Sketch Detail; prepared by Town of Pickering; Drawings 1 and 2; as received on June
11,1996. (Total Drawings 2)
(2) Photo Voltaic Lighting Details; prepared by Ontario Hydro; as received July 10, 1996. (Total
Drawings 2)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
.&aposal:
The applicant proposes to construct an at-grade pathway and install photo voltaic lighting within the
Regional Storm flood plain of the Duffins Creek. The pathway will run parallel to the watercourse and
in some instances will be within 10 metres of the waters edge. The pathway will formalize an existing
informal trail created by students from an adjacent high school who use the valley to access Valleyfarm
Road. The pathway length is approximately 500 metres.
The photo voltaic lighting consists of a singular pole with a solar panel and battery attached at the top
end. The pole with battery and solar panel will be above the floodline elevation. The pole will be
anchored to withstand flood depths and velocities associated with a Regional Storm event. A total of
10 poles will be installed within the flood plain. The lighting is being donated by Ontario Hydro.
C.ontrnl of Flooding'
There will be no impact on the control of flooding as the pathway is at grade and the lighting poles are
singluar and allow for the passage of flood flows.
Polllltion'
Sediment fencing will be erected between the proposed works and the watercourse and will remain in
place for the duration of the works.
c.on!,:p.rvation of I and'
The trail is currently being used informally by students of the adjacent high school. The applicant is
proposing to plant sections of the valley adjacent to the trail to rehabilitate and re-establish riparian
plantings in areas which are currently sparse of vegetation.
Poli~y Gllidp.linp.!,:'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28040 Application #: 120/96/PICK
For information contact: Russel White, ext. 306
Date: 1996.06.24.
B314 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996
(7 4 7fi)Tran!': Northp.rn Pipp.linp.!,:
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 26 and 27, Concession 3, (West Duffins Creek east of
Whites Road), in the Town of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to replace a section of degraded pipeline referred to as a sleeve along the Trans
Northern Pipeline right-of-way within the stream corridor of the Duffins Creek.
The permit will be issued from July 12, 1996 to July 11, 1998.
(1 ) West Duffins Creek Sleeve Replacement Sites Proposed Construction and Mitigation; Project
1496013-01-104; Figure 1; prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan; dated June 25, 1996.
(2) 1996 Pipeline Maintenance Program Environmental Statement for Water crossing/valley sites;
prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan; dated June 25, 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Erap.asa1 :
The applicant proposes to replace a section of the Trans-Northern Pipeline referred to as a sleeve. The
works are within the Fill Regulated stream corridor of the Duffins Creek. The pipeline is within an
existing right-of-way. The works will be undertaken through the excavation of a 30 metre length of
pipeline to a width of 1.5 metres. The sleeve will be replaced and the site restored to original
conditions. There will be no impact on the adjacent watercourse.
C.ontrnl of Flooding'
There will be no impact on the control of flooding as the site will be restored to original grades.
Pollution'
Sediment fencing will be erected between at the proposed works and the watercourse and will remain
in place for the duration of the works.
c.on!,:p.rvation of I and'
The site will be restored to original conditions in accordance with planting details provided by the
applicant.
Policy Guidp.linp.!,:'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28054 Application #: 126/96/PICK
For information contact: Russel White, Ext. 306
Date: 1996.06.24.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/96, JULY 12, 1996 B315
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11: 1 0 a.m., July 12, 1996.
Ri~hard O'Rrip.n .J C.raig Mathp.r
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/pl
~
", the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING #6/96 Page B316
July 26, 1996
The Executive Committee met in the Boardroom at Black Creek Pioneer Village on Friday,
July 26, 1996. The Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 8:45 a.m.
PRESENT
Patrick Abtan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. for Brian Harrison
Lorna Bissell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. for Lois Griffin
Michael Di Biase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Lois Hancey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice Chair, Authority
Richard O'Brien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair, Authority
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard Whitehead .................................................. Member
REGRETS
Lois Griffin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Joan King ........................................................ Member
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
RES. #891/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Patrick Abtan
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #5/96, held July 12, 1996, be approved. . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
B317 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996
RES. #892/96 - DELEGATIONS
la) Mr. Myron Pestaluky, of Blackplate Investments, regarding disposal/lease of Authority-
owned lands, east of Islington Avenue, South of Rutherford Road, in the vicinity of
Vaughan.
(b) Mr. Lou Pompili representing Father Claudio Moser In Trust, regarding disposal/lease of
Authority-owned lands, east of Islington Avenue, South of Rutherford Road, in the vicinity
of Vaughan.
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Patrick Abtan
THAT the above delegations be heard and received. .......................... CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
RES. #893/96 - THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO VALLEY AND
SHORELINE REGEN ERA TION PROJECT 1992 - 1996
Continuation of the Spring bank Avenue slope stabilization and erosion project
and specific recommendations for 41 Springbank Avenue, City of Scarborough.
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT The Authority endorse the continuation of the Springbank Avenue
slope stabilization and erosion control project, City of Scarborough, under the "Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project 1992-1996" subject to reaching a
suitable agreement with the owners, and in accordance with the following management strategy:
1 ) design and construction of a slope buttress at the toe of slope, the installation of a
free draining rubble and granular blanket , and the installation of dewatering wells in
the vicinity of 39 and 41 Springbank Avenue
2) the acquisition of 39 and 41 Spring bank Avenue
THAT staff be directed to proceed to Implement the management strategy at a total estimated cost
of $500,000 subject to confirmation of funding.
THAT in light of the unsafe site conditions staff be directed to advise the City of Scarborough and
the owner that the terms of the permit issued by the Authority cannot be fulfilled and that the site
should be secured;
Continued...
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996 B318
THAT staff be directed to pursue funding opportunities with the City of Scarborough;
THAT staff be directed to negotiate the acquisition of 39 and 41 Springbank Avenue this being the
only alternative erosion control option to address the hazard;
AND FURTHER THAT the owners of 39 and 41 Springbank Avenue and Metropolitan Toronto be so
advised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Meeting #5/96, dated July 12, 1996, the Executive adopted the following Motion To Refer
under Resolution # B78/96:
"THAT item of correspondence (a) be referred back to staff for report to the next Authority
meeting on the status of erosion hazards along Springbank Avenue, the history of Authority
involvement and a recommended course of action."
Shoreline protection works below Springbank Avenue consist of a series of 5 armoured groynes
designed to anchor 4 beach cells (see anached Figure 1). The shoreline area was conveyed to the
Authority by the benefiting owners at nominal consideration including all riparian rights to facilitate
the construction of the works. The total length of shoreline protected by these structures is
approximately 400 metres. Groynes 1 and 2 were constructed in 1981, groynes 3 and 4 in 1982,
and groyne 5 in 1984. Small rubble material was deposited within the beach cells in conjunction
with the construction of the groynes. The total cost for these works was approximately $400,000.
The design approach taken along Springbank Avenue is typical of the Authority's approach for
addressing the erosion along the entire Scarborough Bluffs. Typically we protect the toe of the
bluffs from the wave action of Lake Ontario through the construction of various revetments, while
allowing the over steepened bluff face to self stabilize or flatten. Invariably this approach results in
useable table land (often rear yards) and occasionally structures being lost as the crest recedes.
The original project never identified the properties that may be at risk along this reach, however, a
study conducted by Terraprobe Geotechnical Engineers in 1989 identified four other homes that
could potentially be at risk in addition to 39 and 41 Spring bank.
In addition, top dumping of free draining rubble material was carried out between 1980 and 1982
at No.7 Springbank Avenue. This work was carried out under an Authority permit but at the cost
of the property owner. No.7 was eventually acquired by the Authority in 1995.
At Meeting #5/95, held July 14, 1995, the Executive Comminee, under Resolution #E89/95
approved the retention of Terraprobe Geotechnical Engineers to carry out a slope stability
investigation and management strategy for erosion control for the easterly portion of Spring bank
Avenue (properties 33 - 41, inclusive).
As requested by amendment under Resolution #E90/95, staff received a written request from the
Chief Building Official for the City of Scarborough for comments from the Authority regarding
erosion and slope stability for 41 Springbank Avenue.
The final Terraprobe report summarized the detailed geotechnical investigation and analysis for the
easterly five houses along Spring bank Avenue, and based on the findings, recommended an erosion
control management strategy to address the long term safety and protection. The report
recommended that since house Nos. 39 and 41 Spring bank Avenue were at risk from ongoing
erosion and that there was no cost effective option to ensure the long term safety and protection
B319 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996
of the occupants and property, the preferred management strategy was to acquire the properties
and demolish the houses. The report further stated that if funds were not available to acquire the
properties, then the following strategy was recommended to minimize the risks to personal safety
and property in the short term:
- relocate the houses as far back as possible from the bluff to protect against slope slide
failures;
- improve drainage of the upper slope by installing at least two deep dewatering wells to
protect against slope failures due to groundwater seepage;
- monitor and maintain existing shoreline protection works to improve their design life; and
- ensure that any new development of existing houses not be located within the Regulatory
Shoreline in accordance to the Provincial Shoreline Policy.
The owner of No. 41 undertook extensive engineering analysis and obtained approvals for a
proposal to move the house closer to the street line by approximately 12.4 metres. In addition, an
anchored shoring wall was to have been installed near the edge to protect the rear yard from
erosion over the short term. At the time, Terraprobe reviewed the proposal and estimated a life
expectancy for the dwelling of 38 years. Terraprobe stated that the proposed work was only a
short term solution, and further that the works did not address the issue of groundwater seepage or
remedial options beyond the projected life expectancy of the structure.
To provide additional protection, the Terraprobe report recommended consideration be given to the
installation of deep wells to reduce the hydrostatic pressure in the bluffs' slope during periods when
the slope face may be frozen and drainage blocked. Submersible pumps would be installed to
pump groundwater directly into the storm sewer for short periods during late winter to early spring
when the groundwater level rises suddenly and abnormally.
In a letter from the owner Rafael Nebres to Craig Mather, dated August 31, 1995, it was noted
that the cost of the relocation and anchored shoring would be approximately $100,000. In this
letter, the owner requested assistance from the MTRCA up to $100,000 towards the cost of
relocation and installation of anchored shoring to stabilize the rear yard property.
At Meeting #8/95, dated September 22, 1995, the Authority under Resolution #A207/95 adopted
the following:
THAT staff be directed to negotiate the acquisition of 41 Springbank Avenue, this being the
preferred management strategy to address the long term safety for this property within this
section of the Scarborough Bluffs as recommended in the Terraprobe's final report, dated
September 1995, up to a total cost of $215,000, plus disbursements;
THAT staff advise the City of Scarborough that the Authority has no objection to the
relocation of the house at 41 Springbank Avenue in accordance with the relocation details
shown on drawing SHI, prepared by RWB Engineering Ltd., received September 13, 1995
subject to the owner and any other party with a registered interest in the property entering
into an agreement with The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
suitably releasing and indemnifying the Authority, The Province of Ontario, The Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto and the City of Scarborough and the owner receiving the
appropriate permit approval under Ontario Regulation 158 and suitable documentation being
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996 B320
registered on title;
THAT staff advise the property owner of 41 Springbank Avenue that the Authority will not
contribute financially towards the relocation of the house and the anchored shoring wall;
THAT staff be directed to investigate, in conjunction with the City of Scarborough, the
installation of two dewatering wells to address long term slope stability as recommended by
the Management Strategy subject to provincial funding;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
AMENDMENT
RES. #A20S/95
THAT the main motion be amended to exclude the first recommendation which states:
"THA T staff be directed to negotiate the acquisition of 41 Springbank A venue, this
being the preferred management strategy to address the long term safety for this
property within this section of the Scarborough B/uffs as recommended in the
Terraprobe Limited's final report, dated September p to a total cost of $215,000,
plus disbursements;"
At Meeting #8/95 the Executive committee under Resolution #E153/95 approved a permit to
relocate the house and construct a retaining wall. The owners of 41 Spring bank have not been
able to afford to relocate the house and as a result the situation has deteriorated considerably since
last fall. A report by Terraprobe Geotechnical Engineers dated July 11, 1996 has advised that it
may no longer be safe to relocate the house. Staff have advised the City of Scarborough and the
owner of 41 Spring bank of our concerns.
RATIONALE
The Authority has adopted "The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline
Regeneration Project 1992 - 1996" (Project). Within this Project, Authority staff identify and
prioritize candidate sites requiring remedial erosion control works. The goals and objectives have
been established under the Shoreline Management Plan and are outlined in the Project. All remedial
projects are subject to the Conservation Authorities Class Environmental Assessment planning and
design process. During this process, all alternative remedial options are identified and can include
do nothing, property acquisition, shoreline stabilization, slope stabilization and any combination of
these to address the hazards. If acquisition is determined to be the most economically and
environmentally acceptable option, then no further studies or remedial works are required.
Given the proximity of house Nos. 39 and 41 Springbank Avenue to the current crest of slope, the
houses will be in danger if the bluff slope is allowed to self stabilize and flatten. In fact, recent
slope failures in the area have brought the slope crest and a near-vertical high scarp, to the
southeast corner of the basement foundation at No. 41. Any additional ground loss will undermine
the house foundation and risk collapse of the dwelling down the 55 metre high bluff. The
accelerated rate of erosion experienced recently in this section of the bluffs has placed the homes
at imminent risk.
Because of the magnitude of the actively eroding gully and the proximity of the crest to No. 41, we
are also concerned for the safety of workers who might attempt to relocate the dwelling per the
B321 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996
MTRCA Executive Committee's Permit (Res. #153/95) approved on October 13, 1995. Due to
unforseen delays, the house moving and proposed shoring system were not undertaken last year.
Since then, portions of the rear deck have fallen over the bluff and the sun room is overhanging and
could collapse at any time. The recent slope failures have brought the near-vertical high scarp to
the house basement, and there is now a significant risk of additional crest loss and damage to the
existing house and to any workers and equipment near the slope crest. It is now apparent that
there is not an adequate safe building site within the lot that would provide for the long term safety
of the structure and its occupants, therefore it is the opinion of staff that it is no longer possible to
fulfill the terms of the permit issued by the Authority.
Having completed two comprehensive geotechnical investigations and analyses for Spring bank
Avenue, the recommended management strategy that meets the goals and objectives of the project
is to acquire properties 39 and 41 Springbank Avenue, and to undertake engineering works to
partially stabilize the slope to minimize the future risk to municipal services. These works would
entail top dumping of free draining materials to control the rate of internal erosion presently
occurring on the bluff face. The estimated cost for this work is $200,000. This strategy is
supported by the fact that natural hazards such as bluff erosion are unforseen and unpredictable.
Also public amenities; e.g., the road and associated servicing, will eventually be affected. In this
case Spring bank could eventually be effected.
There is an urgency to resolve this matter as the house is vacant and acts of trespass and
vandalism have occurred. It is essential that the house be secured immediately and removed as
soon as possible. In addition, even though the bluff toe has been fenced and signed, there is still a
risk to the public from falling debris.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for the acquisition would be subject to provincial approval to reallocate funding within the
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project 1992 - 1996 or the
utilization of available land sale revenues.
Report prepared by:
Ron Dewell (ext. 245)
Nick Saccone (ext. 301)
SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LANDS
East side of Islington Avenue, South of Rutherford Road
City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York
1. Sale to Blackplate Investments Inc.
2. Sale to Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, Franciscan Brothers
Receipt of revised offers from Blackplate Investments Inc. and Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, for
the purchase of surplus Authority lands, situate on the east side of Islington Avenue, South of
Rutherford Road, in the City of Vaughan, The Regional Municipality of York. Status of negotiations
currently in progress. CFN#22900H
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996 B322
Moved by: Lorna Bissell
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
1. THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a
proposal from Blackplate Investments Inc. for the purchase of certain Authority-owned land situate
on the east side of Islington Avenue, south of Rutherford Road in the City of Vaughan, in The
Regional Municipality of York;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to complete a
sale to Blackplate Investments Inc. in this instance;
THAT a parcel of surplus Authority-owned land, containing a minimum of 4.04 hectares, (10 acres),
be sold to Blackplate Investments Inc., subject to receipt of a satisfactory agreement, said land
being Part of Lot 15, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, The Regional Municipality of York;
THAT THE Authority request the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources to complete the sale
of the subject land on the following terms and conditions;
1 ) The sale price is to be at the rate of $180,000 per acre; i.e. $1,800,000, payable in cash
with all outstanding amounts due on closing. If the area of the property, as determined by
the Authority's surveyor in conjunction with the purchaser, is more than 10 acres, the
purchase price shall be increased at the rate of $180,000 per acre, calculated to 3 decimal
places.
2) The deposits payable to the Authority are to be as follows:
a) The of sum $135,000 accompanying the agreement
b) A further amount of 2.5% of the purchase price ($45,000), by no later than March
31, 1997
c) Amounts of $100,000 semi-annually (to commence no later than 6 months after
March 31, 1997, and thereafter until closing)
d) $100,000 on March 31, 1999
e) $50,000 if extension is required for conditional period (non-refundable)
3) Completion of the transaction is subject to the purchaser obtaining an official plan
amendment providing for use of the lands for residential purposes, including single family
residential units, either detached, semi-detached, or townhouses, but all with ground level
entry to each unit.
4) The purchaser is to assume all costs associated with re-zoning, official plan amendments,
and any other approvals required to facilitate the proposed development.
5) The purchaser agrees to assume the Authority's conditions as earlier set out by the
Members of the Authority, subject to modifications contained in the appended Executive
Summary .
6) The purchaser is to have the right to purchase any additional surplus lands at this location
which may be deemed suitable by the Authority to be disposed of at a rate of $180,000
per acre.
7) Any additional considerations as are deemed appropriate by the Authority's solicitor.
B323 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996
THAT the sale be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources, in accordance with
Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter 27, as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
2. THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a
proposal from Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, for the purchase of certain Authority-owned lands,
situate on the east side of Islington Avenue, south of Rutherford Road, in the City of Vaughan, The
Regional Municipality York;
AND WHEREAS It is the opinion of the Authority that It is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering Its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to complete a
sale to Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, in this instance:
THAT two parcels of surplus Authority-owned land, containing a total of 4.04 hectares, (10 acres),
more or less, be sold to Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, subject to receipt of a satisfactory
agreement, said land being Part of Lot 15, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, The Regional
Municipality of York;
THAT the Authority request approval of the Minister of Natural Resources to complete the sale of
the subject lands on the following terms and conditions:
1 ) The sale price is to be the sum of $140,000 per acre; i.e. $1,400,000
2) The deposit payable to the Authority is to be the sum $75,000
3) The lands are to be used for institutional purposes, including amongst other things, a
religious retreat centre, a sanctuary, a school, together with appropriate parking facilities
and other ancillary uses
4) The purchaser agrees to assume the Authority's conditions as earlier set out by the
Members of the Authority, subject to modifications contained in the appended Executive
Summary .
5) The subject transaction is to be completed on or before November 29, 1996, with the
balance of the purchase price being paid in cash on closing.
6) Any additional considerations as are deemed appropriate by the Authority's solicitor.
THAT the sale be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with
Section 21 (2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter 27, as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
THE MAIN MOTION WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOT CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996 B324
AMENDMENT #1
Moved by: Patrick Abtan
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT the lands in question be used for institutional uses only for a period of twenty-five years.
AMENDMENT #1 WAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOT CARRIED
AMENDMENT #2
RES. #894/96
Moved by: Patrick Abtan
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT staff negotiate with the proponents such that the Authority receive payment for any storm
water management lands and road allowance lands of the Authority, that may be required for the
proposals referred to in the main motion.
AMENDMENT #2 WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Negotiations are continuing, and at the time of writing this report, certain issues are outstanding.
The potential disposition of surplus Authority lands at this location has been a matter of public
record since mid-February of this year. During this period, the Authority has received offers from
and carried out negotiations with 8 different groups: Blackplate Investments Inc., Father Claudio
Moser, In Trust, (Franciscan Brothers), Sam Frustaglio, In Trust, Fieldgate Development and
Construction Ltd. In Trust, Vrili Construction Weston Ltd., In Trust, Trigger 11 Construction Inc.,
Little Hampton Holding Corp. and Mr. and Mrs. William R. Fach.
At the Authority Meeting Held on June 28, 1996, the following Resolutions were adopted:
Res. #A 111/96 That staff be directed to continue to negotiate with 81ackplate
Investments Inc. and Sam Frustaglio, In Trust, for the purchase/lease
of the Authority-owned lands, on the east side of Islington A venue,
south of Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed
and report to the Executive Committee/Authority at the earliest
possible opportunity.
Res. #A 112/96 That the main motion be amended to include Father Claudio Moser,
In Trust, and the City of Vaughan, in negotiations for the
purchase/lease of Authority-owned lands, on the east side of
Islington Avenue, south of Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan, The
Regional Municipality of York, Humber River Watershed
B325 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996
In response to the direction provided by the Members of the Authority at the meeting held on June
28, 1996, the following action was taken:
On July 3, 1996, meetings were held with representatives of Blackplate Investments Inc.,
Sam Frustaglio, In Trust, and Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, with the proponents being
advised that none of the earlier submissions were acceptable to the Members of the
Authority and inviting them to give consideration to amending their earlier proposals or
submitting new proposals.
On July 6, 1996, a letter was forwarded to the Chief Administrative Officer of the City of
Vaughan advising the City as to the action taken by the Members of the Authority at the
meeting held on June 28, 1996, requesting early advice from the City as to whether the
City had any interest in the purchase or lease of the surplus Authority lands at current
market value.
On July 8, 1996, the Council of The City of Vaughan considered the Authority
communication of July 6, 1996, and confirmed that the City has no interest in the purchase
or lease of the lands. A copy of the information received from the City of Vaughan is
included with the Agenda for this meeting under the heading Correspondence.
On July 9, 1996, letters were forwarded to the 3 proponents providing a copy of the
preliminary plan of survey showing the 15 acres owned by the Authority which had been
declared surplus and inviting the proponents to make an amended or new proposal on a
final basis with respect to this property by no later than 9:45 a.m. on Friday, July 12,
1996, with proposals being scheduled to be opened immediately prior to the Executive
Committee Meeting.
On July 12, 1996, at the ExecutIve Committee Meeting, offers were received from
Blackplate Investments Inc. and Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, (Franciscan Brothers), under
a joint submission, whereby each of the proponents would purchase a minimum of 10
acres. No submission was received from Sam Frustaglio, In Trust.
Subsequent to July 12, 1996, a number of meetings have been held involving Authority
staff and their advisors with representatives of Blackplate Investments Inc., and Father
Claudio Moser, In Trust.
ANALYSIS
At the July 12, 1996, Executive Committee meeting, The proponents submitting the joint proposal,
Blackplate Investments Inc. And Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, advised the Executive Committee
Members that there was additional Authority owned table land adjacent to the 15 acre parcel
declared surplus and further, that the joint proposal required a minimum of 20 acres to be
achievable. The Executive directed staff to review the joint proposal and report to the next
Authority or to a special meeting of the Executive Committee to be held prior to the next Authority
meeting.
Representatives of the joint proponents in addressing the Executive on July 12th, stated that the
joint proposal was presented in the spirit of attempting to come up with a proposal which would
accommodate the objectives of all parties. To this end, the joint proposal has the 10 acres fronting
on Islington Avenue developed by Father Moser, In Trust, (the Franciscan Brothers) for institutional
purposes, a use supported by the community immediately across the road. The lands to the east (
the rear 10 acres, plus or minus) served by a road allowance through the front 10 acres, are to be
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996 B326
developed by Blackplate Investments for low density, residential uses.
The Authority's objectives are satisfied in that the joint proposal includes sale of 10 acres for
institutional use at $140,000 per acre ($1.4 million) closing November 26, 1996; sale of 10 acres,
plus or minus, at $180,000 per acre ($1.8 million) closing in 2 to 4 years with appropriate deposits,
5% of which is non-refundable. The proposed uses are compatible with Authority objectives and
will have negligible impact on adjacent lands.
Schedule "A" attached, provides details of the terms and conditions of the joint proposal.
Appraisal
Staff, as mentioned previously, have utilized the services of the Appraisal Department of Royal
LePage since the subject lands were declared surplus. Gordon Parker, A.A.C.I., of Royal LePage,
has provided the Authority with confirmation that the proposed sale price is fair and reasonable
assuming the outstanding issues can be resolved to the Authority's satisfaction.
Tenancy
Situate on the land proposed to be sold to the Franciscan Brothers, is a dwelling currently rented to
the assistant Superintendent at the Boyd Conservation Area. The Authority will be required to re-
locate the tenant in order to make this dwelling available for the November 29, 1996, closing date.
The employee is aware of this possibility and of the Authority's obligations to provide a comparable
dwelling at no additional expense to him.
Illustration of the Site
The attached sketch illustrates in concept the parcels to be disposed of to the proponents. Legal
survey work is in the process of being carried out and the final boundaries will be set to the
satisfaction of the Authority's technical staff. The access road which divides the two parcels
proposed to be sold to Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, will be retained by the Authority until
Blackplate Investments Inc. is in a position to close at which time it will be dedicated or conveyed
for road purposes to Blackplate Investments Inc. or the City of Vaughan.
Authority Conditions
At the time the subject lands were declared surplus, the following conditions were imposed by the
Members of the Authority:
a) All existing municipal requirements for future use of this Part of Lot 15, Concession 7, City
of Vaughan, being met;
b) The proposed use is to be of a nature compatible with the Authority's objectives and to not
negatively affect the Authority's adjacent holdings;
c) A vegetated buffer of not less than 10 meters is to be established to the satisfaction of the
Authority on lands to be retained by the Authority;
d) Storm water management practices are to be carried out on the site to the satisfaction of
the Authority;
e) Fencing along the new property boundary is to be carried out to the satisfaction of the
Authority, at no cost to the Authority;
f) An archaeological investigation is to be conducted before any site disturbance with any
mitigating measures required being carried out at no cost to the Authority.
B327 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996
Upon reviewing the area in the field, technical staff are satisfied that sufficient table lands are
available to achieve the development requirements of both proponents
In addition to the above-noted, the following terms and conditions were included in the proposal
call and subsequent negotiations by staff:
(a) The requirement for the Authority to obtain approval of the Minister of Natural Resources
for the sale in compliance with the provisions of The Conservation Authorities Act;
(b) The requirement for the Authority to obtain a severance of the lands to be sold in
compliance with the provisions of the Planning Act;
(c) The requirement for the sale to be approved by the Executive Committee and Members of
the Authority;
(d) The requirement for the purchaser to be responsible for any amounts to be paid to any
Municipal or other Governmental Authorities, including lot levies, development charges or
any other similar costs.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
There is an immediate need to proceed with the sale of lands at this location to meet current
acquisition commitments which are as follows:
(a) Milne Hollow (Markovic) - Located in the vicinity of Lawrence Avenue and the Don
Valley Parkway, City of North York Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
(b) Humber Trail Links - Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
(c) Centennial Creek - City Of Scarborough, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
(d) Moore Property - Located on the west spit of Frenchman's Bay, Town of Pickering
(e) Authority share of a portion of purchase price for the McKean Property at
Frenchman's Bay, in the Town of Pickering
(f) Property available for purchase on the Lake Ontario shoreline at Chesterton Shores,
in the City of Scarborough
(g) Property available for purchase on the Lake Ontario shoreline at Pickering Beach in
The Town of Ajax.
Report prepared by:
Don Prince, Ext. 221
SCHEDULE n A n
Executive Summary
Executive summary of joint proposal of Blackplate Investments Inc. and Father Claudio Moser, In
Trust, (Franciscan Brothers) for the purchase and development of surplus Authority-owned lands on
the east side of Islington Avenue, south of Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality
of York.
1. Blackplate Investments Inc. (AMENDED EXECUTED OFFER NOT RECEIVED AS OF THE
WRITING OF THIS REPORT - HOWEVER, WE EXPECT IT WILL CO NT AIN THE FOLLOWING
TERMS)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996 B328
Area Minimum of 10 acres to be purchased
Purchase price: $180,000 per acre
-Purchaser to have the right to purchase any additional Authority surplus land
at this location at the rate of $180,000 per acre.
-In the event that the Franciscan Brothers do not proceed with the purchase of
the lands set out in the proposal from Father Claudio Moser, In Trust,
Blackplate Investments Inc. is to have the right to purchase those lands on the
same basis as set out in the Blackplate proposal.
Deposit: (a) $135,000 accompanying agreement, to be credited to purchase
price. If transaction is not completed, the Authority may retain
deposit if no default by the Authority and the purchaser has waived
the initial conditional period.
(b) 2.5% of the purchase price ($45,000) by no later than March 31,
1997
(c) Amounts of $100,000 semi-annually (to commence no later than 6
months after March 31, 1997 and thereafter until closing.
(d) $100,000 on March 31,1999.
(e) $50,000 payable on request for extension to condition period of
official plan amendment being in place. (non-refundable)
Closing Date: The earlier of 4 years after acceptance by the Authority or 30 days after draft
plan approval and the expiration of all appeal periods relating to all approvals.
Conditional Period: (a) The purchaser to have 60 days after acceptance by the Authority to
carry out soil tests and carry out an economic feasibility study on
the viability of the proposed development. In the event the
purchaser is not satisfied with the findings of the studies, the
deposit is to be returned and the agreement will be terminated.
(b) Prior to March 31, 1 999, the purchaser is to have achieved an
official plan amendment to permit residential uses for the property,
satisfactory to the purchaser. In the event this condition is not
satisfied or waived by March 31, 1999, the purchaser, upon notice
to the Authority prior to March 31, 1999 and payment of an
additional non-refundable amount of $50,000, may extend the time
by a further 6 months.
Type of Use: Residential, including single family residential units either detached, semi-
detached, or townhouses, but all with ground level entry in each unit.
Survey: Survey to be provided at purchasers expense
Fencing: Purchaser to construct fencing to Authority specifications as may be required.
Vegetative Buffer: Purchaser to provide buffer planting to the extent as required by the Authority
to a maximum cost of $25,000, unless the purchaser is required by City of
B329 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996
Vaughan to provide actual lands for parkland dedication in which case the
$25,000 is waived, as well as the obligation to provide buffer planting.
Services: Blackplate Investments Inc. are to be responsible for the cost and provision of
all services to their proposed development including the construction of the
road and services running easterly from Islington Avenue dividing the lands
being sold to the Father Moser, In Trust.
Other Conditions: Purchaser is to be responsible for cash-in-lieu for parkland dedication as may be
required by the City of Vaughan.
Purchaser is to be responsible for lands for parkland as may be required by the
City of Vaughan;, in which event, Authority will waive purchasers requirement
to pay up to $25,000 for vegetation on buffer.
Storm water management best practices to be employed; actual configuration
to be determined by Vendor and Purchaser during 60 day acceptance period.
2. Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, (Franciscan Brothers) (AN AMENDED OFFER HAS BEEN
RECEIVED BUT STAFF FEEL CERTAIN ADDITIONAL CHANGES ARE REQUIRED BEFORE IT
CAN BE ACCEPTED)
Area: 10 acres, more or less
Purchase price: $140,000 per acre
Deposit: $75,000 accompanying agreement to be held by the Authority pending
completing or termination and to be credited to purchase price
Closing Date: On or before November 29, 1996
SCHEDULE" A" CONTINUED
Conditional Period: The purchaser to have 30 days after acceptance by the Authority to review the
property in detail including carrying out any inspections that the property is
suitable for its proposed construction etc. In the event the purchaser is not
satisfied with its findings, the deposit is to be returned and the agreement will
be terminated.
Survey: Authority to pr: ,:oe purchaser within 2 weeks after acceptance at no cost to
purchaser, an up-to-date survey confirming area available for purchase is 10
acres.
Fencing: Purchaser to construct fencing to Authority specifications if required
Vegetative Buffer: Purchaser shall ensure that an existing vegetated buffer area of 10 meters is
maintained, consistent with the current state of vegetation on the adjoining
property, if any.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/96, JULY 26, 1996 B330
OUTSTANDING ISSUES
. Guaranteed Authority access and road
. Uses and covenants for lands being purchased
. Cooperation regarding the development of adjacent land
. Price to be paid for additonal land if Blackplate does not proceed
. Various other minor issues
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:30 a.m., July 26, 1996.
Richard O'Brien J. Craic Mather
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
Ipl
~ -
V the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #7/96 Page B331
August 16, 1996
The Executive Committee met in the Humber Room, 5 Shoreham Drive on Friday, August 16, 1996.
The Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT
Michael Di Biase ........................................................ Member
Lois Griffin ............................................................ Member
Lois Hancey ................................................. Vice Chair, Authority
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Joan King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard O'Brien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair, Authority
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard Whitehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
RES #895/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #6/96, held July 26 , 1996 be approved. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
B332 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
RES. #B96/96- DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Wood Windows Contract. This report advises on the results of the wood
windows quotations received by the Authority as part of Tender Opening Sub-
Committee Report #21/96.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #21196
(Tender Addendum), dated August 2, 1996, on wood window quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the supply and installation of the
wood windows associated with the Don Valley Brick Works site restoration project to WindowCraft
for the amount of $100,959 (excluding GST), with a contingency of $12,000 for additional hardware
and unknown conditions resulting in a total contract cost of $112,959 (excluding GSTI. .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This contract is for replacement of windows in Buildings 1 and 5 primarily.
Oleson Worland Architects and Vanbots Construction Group, the project construction manager,
prequalified contractors experienced in this type of work. Tenders were opened at Tender Opening
Sub-Committee #21/96, on Friday, August 2, 1996.
The results of the post tender addendum process are:
Contractor Bids
James Darrah & Associates $105,476
Marvin Contracting Declined
Ridley Windows Dechned
Vanbots Construction Corp. $142,980
Window Craft $100,959
Contractors who declined to bid did so due to scheduling difficulties.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B333
RATIONALE
A general review and analysis of the bids was conducted. Since only two bids were received, award
for the supply of materials for the wood window contract was delayed and a post tender addendum
issued in order to obtain additional pricing for this contract. This process will result in more
competitive bidding while not delaying selection of a window manufacturer.
A general review and analysis was conducted with the low bidder, and it was determined that the
scope of their work was complete. In addition, the low bidder met all of the other criteria.
Based on this information, staff recommend the award of contract to Window Craft in the amount of
$100,959 to complete the wood windows for Buildings 1 and 5.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in Account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
For information contact:
Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
RES #897/96 - DON V ALLEY BRICK WORKS REGEN ERA TION PROJECT
Mechanical Works Contract. This report advises on the results of the mechanical
works quotations received by the Authority as part of Tender Opening Sub-
Committee Report #23/96.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #23/96,
dated August 2, 1996, on mechanical works quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the mechanical works associated with
the Don Valley Brick Works site restoration project to Adelt Mechanical for the amount of $256,700
(excluding GST). ....................................................... CARRIED
B334 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
BACKGROUND
This contract is for plumbing, electrical and heating primarily in building one. Oleson Worland
Architects and Vanbots Construction Group, the project construction manager, prequalified contractors
experienced in this type of work. Based on this prequalification, the following companies were asked
to submit bids:
Adelt Mechanical Works Ltd.
Steen Contractors Ltd.
S.1. Guttman Inc.
George A. Kelson Company Ltd.
Brady
Pipeall
Niagara
Sayers
Bering
The results of Tender Opening Sub-Committee #23/96 are:
c.ontra~tor Bids
Adelt Mechanical Works Ltd. $256,700
George A. Kelson Company Ltd. $324,300
S.1. Guttman Inc. $322,850
Steen Contractors Ltd. $388,000
Contractors who declined to bid did so due to scheduling difficulties.
RATIONALE
A general review and analysis was conducted with the low bidder, and it was determined that the
scope of their work was complete. In addition, the low bidder met all of the other criteria.
Based on this information, staff recommend the award of contract to Adelt Mechanical in the amount
of $256,700, to complete the mechanical work for Buildings 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 13 (see attached
plan).
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
For information contact:
Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B335
-
.. -. . ... - .' - "". -. - _&
Map - 1995 Master Plan - Don Valley Brick Works Regeneration Project
..
. DON VA1.1.!Y IRICI( WORKS R:GENERAiION
1995 MASTER Pl-AN
EX%STtNG BUlLOfNGS
"'-UIT .a. T OCN I/AUZ't I
DICIt weaKS. 1~
I a..-..
s.eQIHQ .
I
t I n .rl =t7
QrNe -
l SM_._ I '~n 9 I ,
I , ,
3 w-.o s-. I I .
4 s-. '-- Seor... I I
5 J.waa_~.. I ~~ i ' I r
-. t2 I
...7 s-~ a.- ,
I j t II' I ta I n I : I I
......~ ,
I Is! 107 : 'i' I
. s-o..- an.. s..... I . :!: I I I i :.J.. I , I ,
s..... I 1 : :: II: , , :
. I I' :- I 'F~ I ,
, a.v,~ SliP'" I i I. i I 11. IIel , , !
10 a../~ ~ I I ,.. I
I I _ . It,. t ,
"'- : . ; I I n 16 ! I
n ~ _ Cuft . ~ I :
, ,
~ ... - I'
T t. SCOC& anu :,.... ~I !
, 1 C i=en "'-m a I . i I
. r 1S
1:: ........ ~... : I . I toO i
1: Snca ~&M~. 5'-l ; i 1
.-.... . . . . . . I .
,. ~ 3t>cz I"~ . I I 1
.....~ I'IMl'I r ' I I i -
15 0-...... Snca I Ii.
"'-'- ~..t I ' I .-
,. T_ lC.iwo. _ 0_ !-; : 1
t7 ""'-'~" - I :
". ./ .
1. 0..."'041" - .-
- ..
, -' ",.-
) -'
.- .
~.... .- .
- . -- ....
.- __ ~t
."" , _-'~ 't'
.- - I
. \ .- - I
.- . .-,.,.- :
.-
.-
.-
-
, ""'I'" ..
"
...
.-
-
.-
-
--' -----.
B336 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996
RES #898/96- DON V ALLEY BRICK WORKS REGEN ERA TION PROJECT
Site Services Contract
This report advises on the results of the site services quotations received by the
Authority as part of Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #24/96.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #24/96,
dated August 2, 1996, on site services quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the site services associated with the
Don Valley Brick Works site restoration project to Crown Drain in the amount of $122,500 (excluding
GST), with a contingency of $73,160 for unknown subsurface conditions resulting in a Total Contract
Cost of $195,660. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This contract is for water and sewer main connections from the Brickworks to existing City of Toronto
services near Chorley Park. Oleson Worland Architects and Vanbots Construction Group, the project
construction manager, prequalified contractors experienced in this type of work. Based on this
pre qualification, the following companies were asked to submit bids:
Vallantine Underground Services Ltd.
Hollingworth Construction Company
Fourwmds Construction Inc.
Ragno Excavating Ltd.
Rutherford Contracting Ltd.
Bess-Con Construction
Crown Drain Company Ltd.
Subgrade
Laski
Abicon
The results of Tender Opening Sub-Committee #24/96 are:
c.ontra~tor Bids
Principal $164,020
Crown Drain Company Ltd. $122,500
Bess-con Construction $124,474
Ragno Excavating Ltd. $213,900
Rutherford Contracting Ltd. $167,640
Vallantine Underground Services Ltd. $166,800
Contractors who declined to bid did so due to scheduling difficulties.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B337
RATIONALE
A general review and analysis was conducted with the low bidder and it was determined that the
scope of work was complete. Based on this information staff recommend the award of contract to
Crown Drain Co. Ltd., in the amount of $122,500 to complete the site services.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in Account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
For information contact:
Nick Saccone (ext.301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
MOTION TO REFER - THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO VAllEY
RES #899/96 AND SHORELINE REGENERATION PROJECT, 1992-1996
Springbank Avenue Erosion Control Project
Purchase of property municipally known as 41 Springbank Avenue, located
on the Scarborough Bluffs, east of Birchmount Road, in the City of
Scarborough.
GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
Lake Ontario Waterfront, Scarborough Sector
Rafael Nebres Property, CFN #27034
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THA T this item be referred back to staff for a further report;
AND FURTHER THAT staff investigate the planning, legal and management implications related to the
potential purchase by the Authority of properties located at 39 and 41 Springbank Avenue. . CARRIED
B338 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996
RES #8100/96 -GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
Flood Plain Component, Rouge River Watershed
W. Mandel Developments Ltd. and Greenhill Developments Ltd. Property
Purchase of property, located north of Elgin Mills Road, west of Yonge Street, in
the Town of Richmond Hill, under the "Greenspace Protection And Acquisition
Project 1996-2000, Flood Plain and Conservation Component - Rouge River
Watershed." CFN 28005
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.914 acres, more or less, consisting of an
irregular shaped parcel of vacant land, be purchased from W. Mandel Developments Limited and
Greenhill Developments Limited, said land being Part of Lot 2, Registered Plan 1642, Town of
Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, and further described as Parts 2, 4 and 5 , Plan 65R-,
consisting of land situate north of Elgin Mills Road, west of Yonge Street;
THAT a restrictive covenant be registered on title in favour of the MTRCA prohibiting the placement of
fill or regrading, the removal of vegetation or the construction of structures on 0.246 acres, more or
less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land, be purchased from W. Mandel Developments
Limited and Greenhill Developments Limited, said land being Part of Lot 2, Registered Plan 1642, Town
of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, and further described as Part 6 Plan 65R-, consisting of
land situate north of Elgin Mills Road, west of Yonge Street;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00;
THA T the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THA T Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A 131/95, Authority Meeting #4/95, May 26, 1995, approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with William L. Mandel, of Bratty and Partners, Barristers and
Solicitors representative of the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence
with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 8339
RATIONALE
In this case the property we are acquiring is part of the flood plain of the Rouge River and falls within
the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition. A restrictive covenant has been negotiated for the
10 meter strip between the flood plain and the fill regulation line.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The parcel being acquired will be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill as part of a management
agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004-11-502.
For information contact:
Ron Dewell, Extension 245
B340 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
-
~-~~.~ -
~- -'
-. ~
\_--
"<:'D
. . \
~--j
r
\ .
...:..:-:---.
=':1::::.".
" . (I _ . __. ... _ .
"'\ \ ",....,,- ~ -ao-.-. ..
-..I'" ( \ ..""...-.... .. ~ _-1:;:-_ .
~""""'" \" - -\ ,!,: ~--
...... I' \ /'" ~ .Z44-)
,- 1.......,',.- (' .___~
~ ....-- ,,"~ ~
\ --
4'as,_,
, ~ -
" -
'"" -- '"'I t:!'N ._-
, ~_~I
~~~ - -.. ~
.. ...... "'---~ \ ,,- - ~ --. .
~,\.::::- SUBJECT PROPERTY - __
~ '~ " ,;
,~ . _, I . ~ ," _____
,- ~
. ~~.. - ~
~ ~, ~. Z' ._.____
~ --- \. '-
~ '.. .\ -; .
~- . \ -'" --"
'\ - o'
" . ~.. \ -. . .
'- ~~. . 0
. '" ./.. ,.
~ ...-
- ~- - . .. ------' ... .
'""- ~. ---- \. . . --.....
. ------ \ -- -............
~ . ..-- --- -- -- ...... ......
~ ~ . --.....
~ 0 .....
.,- - 0"" ~ _~ ............
_...--- . . . ,...~\ . ~:::I-::=';' _-_ '........
--' - "" -~ ,
---- ~ - .
. ~. . -- --, ;:::.
,.. ~
\ · i ~. -- . ~ ';
__ I .....;~~. ..._ _____
. __ -- _~""'_:.--....-l-- _-- )'\ _
--, - -~ . \ ./ -;>::-. I.l __
.40l .----- ~~- ..--- ~- t' \....-.; c: ~
- - ,\ -- ::;"...;: ~ ' -- -- R C-I-/ MO 0
-~~- __.~ '--~- ..--- 1,: ': ,,-- ,I~, N
'_' ....\ .,;;r
\ ....\ - .,r
~ .--' ,.- \;
\....,. ~ -
. ~~~~
~ 0 ~.::~ .
...., ..,.,-", - -. -,
.' .. . I ...-11
- RICHMCND ~ -- .. ...._- .._~
\ _ ...- HILL --.00,
.. ~ - .
."
. o.
J
.. -1.-, ......-:
--
- -'" . . ....
Z..-, - .
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B341
RES #8101/9-6 - EXCHANGE OF LANDS/VICINITY OF 3597 EGLlNTON AVENUE
WEST, CITY OF YORK
717824 Ontario Limited
Receipt of request from 717824 Ontario Limited to explore the possibility of a
land exchange and involving a small fragment of tableland, Humber River
Watershed.CFN 28102
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from 717824 Ontario Limited, the owner of 3597
Eglinton Avenue West, to enter into an exchange of lands situate on the south side of Eglinton Avenue
West, east of Jane Street, City of York;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interest of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to proceed with
this exchange;
THA T the Authority enter into an exchange of lands on the following basis:
(1 ) 717824 Ontario Limited will convey to the Authority a parcel of land containing 0.118 acres,
more or less, being Part of Lot 19, Plan 9S3, City of York, Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto and further described as Part 1 and 6 on Reference Plan 64R-14736;
(2) The Authority will convey to 717824 Ontario Limited a parcel of land containing 0.023 acres,
more or less, being Part of Lot 19, Plan 953, City of York, Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto;
(31 The lands being conveyed to 717824 Ontario Limited shall only be used for parking,
landscaping or gardening purposes;
(4) All parties shall pay their own costs relating to the transaction, except the appraisal and
severance costs which shall be split on a SO/SO basis;
(51 Completion of this sale will be subject to any planning act approvals that may be required;
THAT the exchange is subject to the approvals of The City of York and The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto;
THA T Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
THA T the sale be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with
Section 21 (c) of the Conservation Authorities Act C .27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action
may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary approvals and the
execution of any documents. .............................................. CARRIED
B342 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
BACKGROUND
The subject parcel proposed to be disposed of consists of a fragment of tableland being part of a much
larger area acquired from The City of York in 1980, under the Humber River Flood Plain Lands
Component of the Land Acquisition Project. The parcel being acquired is part of the Humber River
Valley and is within our master plan of acquisition.
The subject exchange is the result of lengthy negotiations in connection with redevelopment of the
site. A permit was issued in connection with the development at Executive Meeting #8/95, dated
October 13, 1995.
Negotiations have been conducted with Claudio Polsinelli of Polsinelli & DaRe, representatives of the
owners.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed this exchange and is in concurrence
with this proposal.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The parcel being acquired will be turned over to The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto as part of the
management agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this transaction will be charged to Account 004-11-502.
Report prepared by:
Ron Dewell, Extension 245
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B343
-
--
.z'-'
---
\32-
106'4
a
~"-n
--
B344 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16,1996
RES #8102/96 - MISSISSAUGA HYDRO-ELECTRIC COMMISSION
Request for a permanent easement for underground hydro cables on the north
side of Derry Road East, East of Airport Road. Receipt of a request from
Mississauga Hydro-Electric Commission to provide a permanent easement for
underground hydro cables located on the north side of Derry Road East, East of
Airport Road, City of Mississauga., CFN 28099
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from the Mississauga Hydro-Electric Commission
provide a permanent easement for underground hydro cables located on the north side Derry Road East,
East of Airport Road, City of Mississauga;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate
with the Mississauga Hydro-Electric Commission in this instance;
THA T a permanent easement containing 0.06 hectares, more or less, (0.15 acres) be granted to the
Mississauga Hydro-Electric Commission underground hydro cables, said land being Part of Lot 11,
Concession 7, East of Hurontario Street, for City of Mississauga, Regional Municipality of Peel;
THA T consideration is to be $2.00 plus an administration fee of $1,000.00 and all legal, survey and
other costs;
THA T said easement is subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources being obtained in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as
amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the
execution of any documents. .............................................. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The subject Authority-owned lands are under a Management Agreement with the City of Mississauga;
and the City is responsible for all maintenance and realty tax costs associated with this property.
The Authority under the easement agreement will obtain appropriate indemnification and all other
Authority concerns will be dealt with.
The Authority technical staff have reviewed the technical details of the proposed construction and are
satisfied. A report will be brought forward to the Executive Committee for consideration regarding a
permit under Ontario Regulation 158 for the construction.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B345
The subject lands were acquired from Paramount Development Corp. in March 1974 under the
Mimico Creek Flood Plain Lands component of the Land Acquisition Project. A plan illustrating this
location follows.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, extension 223
8346 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
i ;
i "'. 11""'\
· ~ r ~,
Li. '. r,f ~
tii'XL ' " ." ,.:
; II .... 0
II =1 .., ~ :-; '"'I'
9t" ~"
"I~ . 1 ~. I....
16 .. .. I' i::
~.!~, ' '.
H V~ L ,j
~~i::" i""-
~ -~
~l ::;;
="&f
i E~
oJ ~ ~
I r. ~ ;)~
~ .;. I .....
8 ~ II ~,~
r ."oJ l -l C
I III .'
. . <
~ I
I - -.: ;.;. I <{
'l Ii z I
\ - oJ t
R . , ! II ~a
I t II i ~ ~ ~ :~ ~
'I, ~ ~ ~ II;;
~ JE ~:i . i\ ~ ~
~ a',-l~..'!
~ !!~~:'-~!~
I" !....... ....
~it..:.~ '. I-
bl
I , _. ._ ~
J -' "'.' '; ~
. .:....' ::!
i.,.'" . ~ ~
I 01 (t .~_ ',: ~
- ~.... l'
rr .., ,., .- -.' a:
. en ., t ()
.. ~ ,C! c:n ~ ~ h..
_ts... 0> JZZ2 GO ..
- 'ID _,
.'r' . ":'!" - ~
. 'Ill f. our : i III
, , , .. - - ~
. ,~ ' 1\
. 10 : __._~ ~
. 'n. IlIZr , \I
~ ~ . ,
~ ~~ .., ~
~ ~ ! ~~
)( e"
III ~!
~ ~I
- . ,",' ~ Ii'
! 0'" . '.,',', 0(
01 . . . .
- ,0 ., \ \ . f, ~ g
.\JlJ(IIIQ,,-, <II. 'f, 4... tiel:!
01 " \ li \ ~ ~ " f:' ". 21'"
~ " . "" \ "'" .' .~ a. X' : ~.. t: .
- "...~. \ .' '.'" ~.' .... '.... : l:l 8
~- "\', \ .. .,'," i!:" 1, '\. . '>
. . : \, .. ',1, QI"- I \' (J) = D
",' \ . ' I \ ' z ~ I!
,., \.. ' . · . ~:l ~
,.q>.\..... . 0::... :I: ; j!;~
..... I :. CD J... : : ... ,... 0 Ii
~ ~, " ~ 0 'f ~'" I \, : It. ; \J:l .. ~ ~
'q. ff ID on -lr- " " It. '-' 2 0 ~Ii
"- " 'E, ~ .., . '\ . 1LJ .. W Q e :I
.' 0 .'" -~ Q l= ~ 0 e
. ,. .!fiJ . . .. ~
. "'- . .' l"'f ' . -_01
'~.~. . I :'
. '. .,
A~ 0#' . "
. .'
,. .'
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B347
RES #B103/96 - THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF PICKERING
Request to utilize Authority land for the construction and maintenance of a trail
Receipt of a request from The Corporation of the Town of Pickering for the
construction and maintenance of a pedestrian trail on Authority-owned land on
the west side of Valley Farm Road north of Finch Avenue in the Town of
Pickering,CFN 27949
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from The Corporation of the Town of Pickering for
construction and maintenance of a pedestrian trail on Authority-owned land on the west side of Valley
Farm Road north of Finch Avenue in the Town of Pickering;
THA T The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority enter into a management
agreement with The Corporation of the Town of Pickering for the construction and maintenance of a
pedestrian trail on Authority-owned lands designated as Part of Lot 21, Concession 2 being Part of
Parts 3 and 4 on Plan 40R-13566, Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials are authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give effect thereto. including the execution of any documents. . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In early 1996, the local Councillor for the area, in the vicinity of Valley Farm Road and Finch Avenue,
brought to the attention of Ontario Hydro, a concern for the safety and security of students utilizing an
informal trail between Pine Ridge High School and Valley Farm Road, This trail is across Authority land
and an Ontario Hydro transmission corridor.
Ontario Hydro has commenced a 2 to 3 year program to evaluate photovoltaic lighting systems and has
agreed to utilize this pathway to test and analyze the performance of systems of various
manufacturers, Each lamp standard acts as a stand alone unit, recharging its battery from a photo-cell
and is activated at night via its motion detector. Ontario Hydro will operate and maintain the system
during the test period and the Town will assume the maintenance costs after. The Town will also be
responsible for the costs associated with upgrading the trail.
The technical aspects of this proposed work were approved by the Members of the Executive
Committee, under the permits approved at the meeting held on July 12, 1996,
B348 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
Attached is a draft copy of the management agreement. The Town will be responsible for all
maintenance costs associated with the trail and payment of the realty taxes on the trail plus two
metres on either side. The agreement also provides indemnification of the Authority relating to the
Town's use of the lands,
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, extension 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B349
-
. ,
'0 <.
} {/ L - -
-'-
~...- --. 22
-r I ~.-.. ~ / -
~D~~ . ,
.,
--- ..
.,
CII
(0 "" - "'~,'
CII
Co. .'0
'.0 .' ...
.0 C'l
-- . . "
r.; ~
Go
I Co. 0
i (--~---r ~
"
~ 0 ~ . - -.0
~
0 .... .(J) Z.2
<0
. ----::::- ., ~
'"
; D~
I
! :J:J
""Ii /0---
alii _
"" \t:::J
!f1 "" ~---
'c=z ' CII -<
. =........- ...
0_ ---
:J:J
o ---=::-
~
.:b
;Z /
'~<
S >
-...
, (/),
- ~~ ~ ......
le~\
"" 4 6 (j ""'-
" CII 0- \.
" 'II
:a .......
'.'" . In
'.0
..I
I' eo
E .\
66
?IN=I'G~::
- r--~"" J
1 , .0 urr
ro
I ,---==. 'J , , -!a
. - . -'~ F AR"I RO.AD _
J ~ - . . .
. -
ro :z-_
I <a I (~ ..... \ ~
.,.
I "
B350 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
THIS AGREEMENT made this _ day of . 1996
BET WEE N:
THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION
CONSERV A TtON AUTHORITY
(hereinafter called the .. Authority~l
OF THE FIRST PART
- and -
THE CORPORATtON OF THE TOWN OF PICKERING
(hereinafter called the "Town~)
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS the Authority has acquired certain lands forming part of the Duffins
Creek Watershed.
AND WHEREAS the Town wishes to construct, install, and maintain pedestrian
walkways with the subject lands to enable public access to the watershed lands.
NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the carrying out of the obligations of the
parties hereto and the sum of ONE ($1.00) DOLLAR (the receiot of which is hereby
acknowledged by each of the parties hereto) the parties hereto agree as follows:
l. The lands affected by this Agreement (hereinaftero4:alled "Lands~) are:
The pedestrian walkways and two (2) metres on either side
of the walkways within Parts 3 & <1 on Plan 4QR-13566 in
the Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham.
2. The Authority grants a licence to the Town to occupy the Lands for
the purpose of construction, installation, maintenance and use by the
public of walkways.
3. The cost of the construction, installation and maintenance of the
walkways shall be the responsibility of the Town, All plans for the
construction shall be approved in writing by the Authority prior to
commencement of any construction,
4. No other buildings or structures shall be erected upon the Lands
without the written consent of the Authority,
5. The Town shall not grant any right. title or interest in the Lands
without the prior written consent of the Authority.
6. The Town covenants and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the
Authority of and from illl manner of claims, damages, losses, costs or
charges occasioned to or suffered by or imposed upon the Authority,
either directly or indirectly. in respect of any matter or thing in
consequence of the Town's use, construction or maintenance of the
walkways including, but without limiting the foregoing, damage or
injury to any person or thing.
7, Notwithstanding any of the provisio.4 herein, the Authority shall
retain control of and be responsible for all aspects of management and
protection of the watershed lands including erosion and all works
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B351
. 2 -
-.
necessary therefor_
8. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until superseded
by an agreement rmnually acceptable to the parties induding an
agreement to terminate this agreement.
9. It is hereby acknowledged that the Authont'( l1es designated the Lands
and surrounding lands on the Dufflns Creek as paSSIve open space
and. therefore. the Authority will not be prOVIding any tormal
grooming or maintenance of same.
10. The Town shall be responsible for all maintenance indudlng grass
cuttlng within two (2) meters of the walkways and the removal of any
hazards on either side of the walk which may in the opinion of the
Authority pose a potential hazard to the users of the lands and
walkways where required and fading which the Authority may carry
out said maintenance and the Town shall reimburse the Authonty for
all costs incurred.
11. The Town shall be responsible for payment of all reatty taxes on the
land.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their corporate
seals attested by the hands of their prODer officers dulv authonzed in that behalf.
THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND
REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
Dick O'BrIen, Chair
J. Craig Mather, Secretary-Treasurer
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF
PICKERING
Mayor
Clerk
B352 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
RES #B104/96 - THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF VAUGHAN
Request to utilize Authority land for the construction and maintenance of a trail.
Receipt of a request from The Corporation of the City of Vaughan for the
construction and maintenance of a pedestrian trail, on Authority-owned land, on
the west side of Clarence Street, in the Woodbridge area of the City of
Vaughan,CFN 27941
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from The Corporation of the City of Vaughan for
construction and maintenance of a pedestrian trail on Authority-owned land on the west side of
Clarence Street, in the Woodbridge area of the City of Vaughan;
THAT The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority enter into a management
agreement with The Corporation of the City of Vaughan for the construction and maintenance of a
pedestrian trail on Authority-owned lands, designated as Part of Block 80 on Plan 65M-2808, and Part
of Block 41 on Plan 65M-2809, City of Vaughan, The Regional Municipality of York;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials are authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give effect thereto, including the execution of any documents. .,..."".
. . . . . . . . . , . . , . , , , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . , . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 1990, the Authority acquired 19,339 acres from Woodbridge Highlands Corporation, This was the
valley land portion of a subdivision, As part of the subdivision agreement, Woodbridge Highlands
Corporation was required to construct a trail system through the open space blocks of the subdivision
which are now owned by the City and the Authority, Attached is a copy of a sketch illustrating the
location of the trail,
Also, attached is a draft copy of the management agreement provided by the City, The City is
responsible for all maintenance costs associated with the trail and payment of the reality taxes on the
trail plus two metres on either side, The agreement also proVides indemnification of the Authority
relating to the City's use of the lands,
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, extension 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B353
THIS AGREE~NT made this _ day of --' 1996
BETWEEN:
TIlE METROPOI.ITAN TORONTO AND REGION
CONSERV~TION AtmlORITY
(hereinafter called the "Authorityj
OF THE FIRST PART
- and -
TilE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF VAUGHAN
(hereinafter called the "CITY")
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS the Authority has acqUired certain lands forming part of the Humber River
Watershed.
AND WHEREAS the City wishes 10 have constructed, installed, 3nd maint:nned pedestrian
walkways with the subject laws to enable public access to the watershed lands.
NOW THEREfORE in considcr:ltion of the carrying out of the obligations of the parties
hereto and the sum of ONE (SI 00) DOLLAR (the receipt of which is hereby acknowledges
by each of the parties hereto) the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. T11e lands affected by thiS Agreement (hereinafter called "lands") are:
T11e pedestrian walkways and two (2) metres on either side of the walkways
within Block 41 of Plan 65M-2809 and Block SO of Plan 6SM-2808 in the City
of Vaughnn, Regional Municipality of York,
2, T11e Authority grnnts :1 license to the City 10 occupy the Lands for the purpose of
construction, installntion, maintenlU1ce and use by the public of walkways and
pedestrian foot bridges.
3. T11e cost of the maintenance of the walkways and pedestrian foot bridges shall be the
responsibility of Ihe City. Construction of the walkways shall be completed by the
developer as a condition of the subdivision agreement All plans for the construction
shall be approved by the Authority prior to commencement of any construction,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
B354
-2-
..
4, No other buildings or structures shall be erected upon the Lands without the written
consent of lhe Authority.
S, The City shall not grant any right, title or interest in the Lands without prior wrillen
consent of the Authority.
6 11le Cily covenants :md agrees to indemnify and S'lIve harmless the Authority of and
from :111 manner of cl:Jil11s. d:Jmages. losses, costs or charges occasioned to or sutTered
by or imposed upon the authority, either directly or indirectly, in respect of any mailer
or thing in consequence of the City's use, construction or maintenance of the
walkways or pedestrian bridges including, but without limiting the foregoing, damage
or injury to :lny person or thing,
7 Not withstanding any of the provisions herein, Ihe Authoriry shall ret:Jin control of and
be responsible for all aspects of management and protection of the watershed lands
including erosion :1nd all works necessary therefore.
8, This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until superseded by an agreement
mUlually acccpl:lble to Ihe parties including an :1sreement 10 Icnninate Ihis agreemenr,
9 It is hereby acknowledged Ihat the Authority has designated Ihe lands and surrounding
Lands on the Humber River as passive open space and therefore, the Authority will
not be providing any formal grooming or maintenance of same,
10. The City shall be responsible for all maintenance including grass cutting with two (2)
meters of Ihe walkway, footbridges and walkways and the removal of any h3Z:Jrds on
either side of the walk which may in the opinion of the Authority pose a potential
ha7.ard to the users of Ihe lands, walkways and foolbridges where required and failing
which Ihe Authority may carry oul said mainlenance and the City shall reimburse the
Authority for all COSls incurred.
II. The City shall be responsible for payment of all re:tlty taxes on Ihe Land.
-3-
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B355
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the pam~~ hereto have hereunto affixed their COl'lIU'ilte seals
attested by the hands of their proper officers duly authonzed In that behalf..
n-fE METROPOUT AN TORONTO AND
REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
Chair
Secretary-Treasurer
n-fE CORPORATION OF THE CITY
OF VAUGHAN
Mayor
Clerk
B356 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
RES #B105/96 - KEATING CHANNEL DREDGING
Continuation of annual maintenance dredging of Keating Channel, City of Toronto
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Toronto Harbour
Commission be requested to continue maintenance dredging of the Keating Channel in 1996 and to
fund one third of the cost for dredging and the Cell One Capping up to a total amount of $300.000;
THA T the City of Toronto be requested to fund a one third share of the cost of the dredging and the
Cell One Capping up to a total amount of $300,000;
THA T the Authority contribute a one third share of the cost of the dredging and the Cell One Capping
up to a total amount of $300,000;
AND FURTHER THAT the Authority continue with the environmental monitoring program. . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) dredged Keating Channel from the time of its construction
in the 1920's to about 1974, As the dredging became more expensive and disposal of the dredged
material more difficult, the THC sought partners in the work, Transport Canada initially agreed to
participate on the basis that if the Channel was not dredged, eventually the delta would spread into the
north east corner of the Inner Harbour and affect shipping channels where the federal government was
responsible to maintain safe navigation depths, The MTRCA also agreed to participate on the basis
that if the Channel was not dredged, the threat of flooding in the lower Don River valley was increased,
The MTRCA's participation was the subject of an environmental assessment between 1980 and 1986
which was subsequently approved, Hence, a three party agreement was struck which saw the cost of
dredging shared three ways during the period 1986 to 1991; Le" THC, Transport Canada and MTRCA,
The cost sharing agreement, which began in 1986, was to fund the cost of dredging the material which
had accumulated between 1974 and 1986, It did not specifically address the funding of the
maintenance dredging which is required annually, The Channel has been completely dredged as
originally planned but additional sediment IS deposited annually, The channel will fill in over time if
annual dredging is not maintained,
The federal government, represented by Transport Canada, advised the THC and the MTRCA that no
federal funds will be available for maintenance dredging after 1991,
During the first four years of maintenance dredging (1992-1995), the THC, City of Toronto and the
MTRCA participated in the cost sharing,
RA TIONALE
There is a continuing need for dredging of the Keating ChanneL Recent studies for the City of Toronto
on Ataratiri confirmed the connection between the dredged channel and Lower Don River flood risks,
In addition, some navigation interests still exist in the north east corner of the harbour. THC has
estimated an annual siltation rate of between 30,000 to 50,000 cubic metres,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B357
The approval of the Keating Channel Dredging Project under the Environmental Assessment Act
imposed conditions on the capping of the dredged material within the disposal cells at Tommy
Thompson Park, There are costs associated with the construction of the proposed cap which were not
part of the original funding for the dredging project. It was anticipated that the cap could be
constructed by placing clean fill over the dredged material, which would have been done at no net
cost, However, the desire to create wetland habitat, while enhancing the existing fish habitat in the
disposal cells which is consistent with the Tommy Thompson Park Master Plan and the terms and
conditions of approval under the Environmental Assessment Act, has resulted in a solution requiring
approximately $600,000 in funding over a two to three year period.
Cell One is now full and, therefore, must be capped to meet the requirements of the Environmental
Assessment,
DETAilS OF THE WORK TO BE DONE
The THC will coordinate and carry out the dredging program, It is estimated that up to 36,000 cubic
metres of material would be dredged from the channel and disposed of in Cells Two and Three of the
Endlkement (Tommy Thompson Park), MTRCA staff will continue the environmental monitoring
program for the dredging and disposal operations,
We anticipate the plan for the wetland cap will be approved by the Regional Director, Ministry of the
Environment and Energy, in accordance with the Keating Channel Environmental Assessment and the
Tommy Thompson Park Master Plan/Environmental Assessment.
Subject to receiving final approval from the Ministry of the Environment and Energy and approval from
the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Capping of Cell One will commence in 1996, Details of the
constructIOn and implementation of the Cell One Capping will be co-ordinated between the THC and
MTRCA staff,
FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS
If the regular maintenance dredging of Keating Channel is delayed or deferred in 1996, it is likely that
the cycle of the past 15 years will simply be repeated. It is unlikely to get easier to find funds in future
budgets, With each year the dredging is delayed, the volume to be dredged increases and the channel
capacity decreases, While the existing Environmental Assessment approval includes annual or biennial
maintenance dredging, it is possible that if the work was delayed beyond that period that an
environmental assessment review may be requested,
Coastal wetlands are critically important ecological components of the Great lakes ecosystem, Within
Toronto, an extensive coastal wetland the Ashbridge's Bay Marsh, was destroyed by the early 1900,
Within the Metro Toronto waterfront boundaries, the Humber and Rouge River estuary marshes are the
only remaining coastal marshes. The shoreline from Toronto to Presquile Bay, including Frenchman's
Bay, Duffins Creek and other coastal marshes within the MTRCA jurisdiction has lost approximately 31
percent of the original 2,044 acres,
Within the TTP area, Cell 1 represents only one of many opportunities to replace a portion of the
historical Toronto wetlands. Including the embayments, there is potential for approximately 95 ha of
coastal wetland habitat creation within an "urban wilderness" landscape, Although, the creation of a
wetland at Cell 1 will not alter the history or trend of wetland loss in Ontario, it will offer an
opportunity for local wetland rehabilitation with additional opportunities for public education,
recreational benefits, wildlife habitat improvement, ecosystem diversity, and other environmental
benefits, In addition, the construction of a wetland would be useful as a demonstration of what can be
achieved in the way of wetland creation and the management of Confined Disposal Facilities within the
Great lakes basin,
B358 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
FINANCIAL DETAilS
The total cost of the Keating Channel dredging for 1996 is $450,000, This is to be shared equally by
the Authority, the City of Toronto and the Toronto Harbour Commission,
The total cost of the first phase of the capping of cell one in 1996 is $450,000, This is to be shared
by the Authority, the City of Toronto and the Toronto Harbour Commission.
The total funding requests therefore for all of the partners is as follows:
MTRCA City of Toronto
IHC
Dredging $150,000 $150,000 $150,000
Cell One Capping $150000 $ 11';0 000 $150000
TOTAL $300,000 $300,000 $300,000
The THC has budgeted a total of $150,000 as its' share of the dredgmg cost and the City of Toronto
will be asked to confirm its $150,000 share,
Funding for the Cell One Capping will need to be confirmed by the City of Toronto ($150,000) and THC
($150,000),
The Authority has budgeted a total of $300,000 for 1996, Funding up to $150,000 will be available
under the Keating Channel Project within Account No, 113-20. The remaining $150,000 has been
budgeted as the Authority's share for Cell One Capping within Account No, 210-04, Both projects are
under the lake Ontario Waterfront Regeneration Project 1995-1999,
For information contact:
Nigel Cowey (Ext, 244)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 8359
RES #8106/96 - EXPERIMENTAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM AND
COVERED MANURE STORAGE
Memorandum of Agreement
Multi-year Memorandum of Agreement to construct and assess the effectiveness
of a covered manure storage and experimental wastewater treatment system,
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Authority enter into a Memorandum of
Agreement or Agreements covering the period from August 1, 1996 to December 31, 2001 with the
Ministry of Environment and Energy and Ted and Dave Dean to construct and monitor the effectiveness
of a covered manure storage and experimental wastewater treatment system (constructed wetland),
AMENDMENT
RES #8107/96
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT staff research different methods of manure storage and wastewater treatment systems.
including the use of wetlands and other aquatic plants. and report back to the Executive Committee.
THE AMENDMENT WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
A dairy farm in the Town of Caledon has been chosen as the site to construct a covered manure
storage and a wastewater treatment system (constructed wetland). The operation is located adjacent
to Salt Creek (a tributary of the West Humber River) and currently discharges milkhouse effluent and
runoff from the manure storage and barnyard into the watercourse, The site has also been nominated
as a Community Action Site in the Humber Strategy,
Covered manure storages represent an alternative to the conventional method of capturing and storing
contaminated runoff generated from a manure pile. Constructing a roof over the existing manure
storage facility will divert precipitation and thereby prevent the generation of contaminated runoff,
Although this technology has been used in southwestern Ontario, few operations in Central Ontario
have adopted the practice, As a result, this site will be used as a demonstration site,
Wastewater treatment systems have been used for years in the southern United States as a means of
treating agricultural effluent, This technology is relatively new to farm operations in Ontario and is
therefore considered experimental. This project will be part of a larger initiative undertaken by six
other Conservation Authorities to examine the effectiveness of the systems in Ontario, Similar projects
have been undertaken by the Essex Region, Upper Thames River, Niagara Region, Nottawasaga Valley,
Rideau Valley and South Nation Conservation Authorities,
B360 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16,1996
The wastewater treatment system for this site has been designed by staff at the Ministry of
Environment and Energy using the most recent technology developed in the United States. The system
is designed to treat the runoff from the dairy operation using a series of ponds and marshes, The
system will utilize gravity as well as a set of pumps and flow gates to transfer the runoff, The system
is estimated at between 1,2 - 1,6 ha in size,
Monitoring of the system will include water quality, vegetation communities and flow volumes, The
system will be monitored for a minimum of five years, pending available funding,
RA TIONALE
Farm operators are constantly seeking new and innovative ways of storing and handling manure and
contaminated farm runoff, Although constructed wetlands have been used in the southern United
States, their effectiveness in Ontario's colder climate is not fully understood, The goal of this project is
to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a wastewater treatment system (constructed wetland) against
that of the conventional method of storing and handling contaminated farm runoff,
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The total cost of the project is estimated to be $90,000, Funding partners in the project include Ted
and Dave Dean, Environment Canada (Great Lakes 2000 Cleanup Fund), and the Ontario Ministry of
Environment and Energy,
In-kind contributors to the project include Agriculture Canada, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food
and Rural Affairs, Terraprobe Limited and the Authority. Local schools and universities will also be
approached to assist with the project.
Funds for the project are available in Account number 117-10 and 117-61,
For information contact:
Ann Marie Weselan (ext, 323)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B361
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES #B108/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Miscellaneous Metals Contract
This report advises on the results of the miscellaneous metals quotations
received by the Authority as part of Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report
#22/96.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the Miscellaneous Metal Work Contract associated
with the Don Valley Brick Works site restoration project to All Railings for the amount of $70,500
(excluding GST) with a contingency amount of $4,500 for lintels and lateral masonry supports resulting
in a total Contract cost of $75.000. ....",.............',...",.,...,....... CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This contract includes railings, stairways, handrails, light brackets and other metal work, Oleson
Worland Architects and Vanbots Construction Group, the project construction manager, prequalified
contractors experienced in this type of work. Based on this prequalification, the following companies
were asked to submit bids:
Expo Iron Works Ltd,
Dundas Iron & Steel Ltd,
Marianne
All Railings division of D,F,L. Fabr. Ltd,
Modern Railings and Metalcraft Ltd,
The results of Tender Opening Sub-Committee #22/96 are:
l.nntractnr Bids
Expo Iron Works Ltd, $66,270
Dundas Iron & Steel Ltd, $74,500
Marianne $114,576
All Railings $70,500
Contractors who declined to bid did so due to scheduling difficulties.
RA TIONALE
A general review and analysis was conducted, Based on this review it was determined that the low
bidder, Expo Iron Works did not meet all criteria, Specifically, there was no bid bond or performance
bond. The second lowest bidder, All Railings, had included the entire scope of work and met all other
criteria,
Based on this information staff recommend the award of contract to All Railing, in the amount of
$70,500 to complete the Miscellaneous Metals Contract,
B362 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto,
For information contact:
Nick Saccone (ext,301) or Adele Freeman (ext.238)
RES #8109/96 - HUMBER WATERSHED STRATEGY
The appomtment of an editor for the Humber Watershed Strategy document,
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THA T an editor be hired for the Humber Watershed Strategy document, as detailed in the attached
Terms of Reference, at a cost not to exceed $20,000. . . , , . . . , . . . . , . , . . , , . . . , , , , , , CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Humber Watershed Strategy is developing to its final stages, A revised outline of the document
was presented to the Humber Watershed Task Force on May 28, 1996,
The services of a writer/editor hired in March, 1996 has proven to be inadequate for the task and that
contract was terminated effective July 23, 1996, For this reason, editorial services are being sought to
complete the document,
In light of the short time frame, staff is alerting the Executive Committee at this time of the
recommendation as it now stands, The final recommendation indicating the services secured for this
appointment will be brought to the attention of the Executive Committee at their meeting on August
16,1996,
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available from Account 118-55 - Humber Watershed Strategy,
Report prepared by:
Madelyn Webb (ext, 331)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B363
TERMS OF REFERENCE
FOR
THE SELECTION OF AN EDITOR
FOR THE
HUMBER WATERSHED STRATEGY
The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
August, 1996
B364 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
SELECTION OF AN EDITOR
FOR THE
HUMBER WATERSHED STRATEGY
PURPOSE
To provide consultant services for editing the Humber Watershed Strategy document,
BACKGROUND
The Humber Watershed Task Force was formed in February 1995. It consists of 45 members from
throughout the watershed consisting of elected municipal and regional councillors, as well as agency,
community and interest group representatives, The work of the Task Force is performed by five sub-
committees along with staff, The sub-committees are: natural heritage; cultural heritage; community
involvement and public use; economics; and; vision and principles,
The strategy has been developed from the background reports, including maps and data gathered from
a variety of sources,
An editor is required to become familiar with the work of the Task Force, the content of the sub-
committee reports and the draft strategy itself, An additional purpose of the strategy document is to
address how the community may use the document to become involved with activities to complement
the strategy and to use the information in the strategy to help make sound decisions about actions that
affect the Humber watershed,
SPECIFIC TASKS
1, Attend meetings of the Humber Watershed Task Force (once per month from August to
October) and its sub-committees, as required,
2, Review all materials produced to date including reports developed by the Humber Watershed
sub-committees on the tOpiCS of Natural Heritage, Culture and Heritage, Economics,
Community Involvement and Public Use and Vision and Principles, the draft strategy and
subwatershed action plan chapters and other draft materials prepared for the document.
3, Using the following outline, in consultation with the Humber Watershed Specialist, the Humber
Watershed Staff Project team and the Humber Watershed Task force develop the strategy
document,
2
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B365
HUMBER WATERSHED TASK FORCE STRATEGY DOCUMENT
Detailed Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 Connected by the Humber: Communities of the Humber Watershed
CHAPTER 2 The Humber...A story of People and Places
CHAPTER 3 Why a strategy is needed and how it was done
CHAPTER 4 What the Task Force Found
CHAPTER 5 A strategy to the year 2021
CHAPTER 6 A call to Action; Subwatershed Action Plans
GLOSSARY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
DELlVERABLES AND TIMING
From August 19, 1 996 to December 31, 1996:
1, Edited Strategy chapter - August 26
2, Edited Subwatershed Action Plans - September 1 9
3, Edited chapter 1 - 4 - October 9
4, Finalize draft with revisions - Nov 15,
CONTENTS OF PROPOSAL
1 , A letter, not more than 2 pages in length, indicating interest, knowledge of the Humber
watershed availability to perform contract, and cost of the work to be performed.
2 Relevant experience including resume, name and telephone numbers of references, writing
samples, books, reports, newsletters or brochures produced; evidence of ability to design
documents with visual appeal and to produce illustrations and graphics to accompany a
manuscript,
3
B366 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
CRITERIA FOR SELECTION
Required
1, Proven ability to interpret and present written, technical information at the Grade 8 (Globe &
Mail readership) level.
2. Familiarity with the Humber Watershed and the subject areas of the sub-committee reports in
Natural Heritage, Culture & Heritage, Economics and Community Involvement and Public Use
(recreation) ,
3, Ability to work with diverse terms and task forces,
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1, The Authority reserves the right to accept or reject any or all the proposals submitted in
response to the request for proposal. The Authority reserves the right to award the study to
other than the lowest cost proposal. This project is subject to Authority approval and funding
availability,
2. The Authority will not bear any cost involved in the preparation or submission of proposals
received as a result of this request,
3, All inquiries relating to this request for proposal must be directed to Ms, Madelyn Webb,
Humber Watershed Specialist, Watershed Management Division (416-661-6600), extension
331.
OTHER INFORMATION
The proposal call for this study will be August 9, 1996, One copy of the proposal should be submitted
no later than 4:00 p,m, On Friday August 9, 1996 to:
Mr, Brian Denney
Director, Watershed Management Division
The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
5 Shore ham Drive
Downsview, Ontario
M3N 1 S4
Interviews will be confirmed as soon as possible following receipt of proposals,
Final selection will be recommended to the August 16, 1996 Executive Committee meeting,
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
MTRCA will be considered the client for this project, The consultant is expected to work closely with
the MTRCA project manager, The Members of the Humber Watershed Task Force will be involved in
the review of all drafts and final work as required.
4
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B367
RES #B110/96 - DURHAM REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES - PARTNERSHIP
MEMORANDUM
Proposed Interim Fee Schedules for Plan Input and Review
Request from the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority for
support for a proposed fee schedule for plan input and review services.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT a fee of $50 per standard subdivision lot for establishment of draft plan conditions
and a further $50 per standard subdivision lot for clearance of draft plan conditions be
instituted on an interim basis only for the processing of subdivisions currently identified as
being in a backlog situation at the Ministry of Natural Resources;
THA T staff monitor the impacts and response to the interim fee and report back to the
Executive Committee as required;
THA T the Region of Durham and the Central lake Ontario Conservation Authority be
advised that the proposed fee structure as drafted by the Central lake Ontario Conservation
be supported in principle;
THA T the draft fee structure form the basis for further discussion with the Region of
Durham and its local municipalities and the development industry,
AND FURTHER THAT based on these discussions and our own business case development,
staff develop a specific fee schedule for Authority approval.
AMENDMENI
RES #8111/96
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THA T the first paragraph of the main motion be amended to read:
THAT a fee of $50 per standard subdivision lot for establishment of draft plan
conditions and a further $50 per standard subdivision lot for clearance of draft plan
conditions be instituted on an interim basis only for the processing of subdivisions in
Durham Region, currently identified as being in a backlog situation at the Ministry of
Natural Resources;
THE AMENDMENT WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . . CARRIED
B368 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #5/96, the following resolution was adopted regarding the draft Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA), with the Region of Durham for the provision of planning services in light of the
withdrawal of the province from the municipal plan input and review process,
URES, #A 121/.96
THA T staff be authorized to provide interim support and to finalize a Partnership
Memorandum for Municipa/ Plan Review between the Region of Durham and the
five Durham Region Conservation Authorities substantially as set out in the attached
draft Partnership Memorandum;
THA T the finalized Partnership Memorandum be forwarded to the Executive
Committee for approval;
AND FURTHER THA T staff continue discussion to develop similar Partnership
Memorandums within the Regions of Peel, York and Metropolitan Toronto , . . . , , . CARR/ED"
The MOA recognized there would be some additional work for the Authorities since they would be
making comments previously provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and the Ministry of
Environment and Energy (MOEE) and therefore allowed for the recovery of costs by the authorities
through fees,
The Region of Durham has also asked the Authorities to assist in alleviating a backlog of subdivisions
that are currently sitting at the MNR because the ministry does not have the staff resources to process
them, We have been advised that there are approximately 30 subdivisions within our areas of
jurisdiction that are in this situation and the Region of Durham would like to have them processed,
This would represent a one time additional workload and cost to us and we should have some
mechanism to offset these costs.
It is our understanding that the draft MOA between the five conservation authorities within the Region
of Durham will be presented to Planning Committee on September 3, 1996 and then on to Council on
September 11, 1996, Durham planning staff have indicated they would like to include with their
report, the authorities' preliminary fee schedule, This would provide an opportunity for Council and
others to have a look at what the authorities are proposing and to start a discussion with the mdustry,
the local municipalities and the Region,
This suggestion was made to representatives of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority
(CLOCA) last week, In response to this request, the staff of CLOCA prepared a proposed fee schedule
which is attached, CLOCA has also, with the approval of its Executive Committee, set an interim fee
for the processing of the backlogged subdivisions within its area of jurisdiction. This fee has been in
place since July 1, 1996.
We have been asked to review and comment on the proposed fee schedule in order that it can be
provided to the Region in time for its September 3rd meetmg. The Region of Durham has made it very
clear that one of the prerequisites for agreeing to the MOA, is consistency in the delivery of the
authorities' new role, This not only simplifies the Region's work, but it brings consistency to the
process for the development industry, Obviously having one fee schedule for all of the authorities
would eliminate confusion and provide equity in the system,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B369
Unlike CLOCA, who has only one member municipality - the Region of Durham, we will be negotiating
similar MOA's with three other Regions; namely, Peel, York and Metro. It is our hope that what we
have developed with Durham, both in terms of roles, responsibilities and fee structure, will be similar to
what we will develop with the other Regional and local municipalities, We therefore want to be sure
that the fee structure be defensible and compatible with the thinking of our other partners,
We are also in the process of developing business plans for our various business units as part of the
1997 budget, The expected funding cuts for 1997 and beyond, require us to implement additional user
fees for a broad range of services. We have reported on this recently and the business cases will be
brought forward in early fall, prior to being submitted to our member municipalities,
The extent to which service fees will be required and the amount of the fees is part of our business
case development and we have not completed them as yet. We are therefore reluctant to put forward
a specific fee schedule until we have completed this review,
We recognize the desire of the Region of Durham and CLOCA to have something on the table for
discussion, however, because we have other municipalities to deal with and because we have not
completed our analysis on what level of fees we would need for 1997 and beyond, staff cannot
support the fee schedule put forward by CLOCA at this time, This is not to say we disagree with the
principle of fees or with the categories proposed, but we would like to be sure we can defend the
specific amounts to the Authority, our municipalities and the industry and that they are sufficient to
meet our revenue needs,
We believe the suggested fee structure can be supported in principle and will form a framework on
which to base further discussions with the Region of Durham, its local municipalities and the
development industry and we want to be part of those discussions, Input received through these
discussions will be very useful for our own thinking and for discussion with our other municipalities,
With respect to the immediate need to deal with the backlog and to be consistent with the current
practice in CLOCA, we do support the implementation of a $50 per lot fee for plans of subdivision,
This will not only provide for some much needed revenue, but will ensure equity with CLOCA and will
allow us time to complete our review and consultation on a more complete set of fees for 1 997,
Since this is a new fee and has been established on a somewhat arbitrary basis, staff would like to
monitor the reaction and Impacts of this fee and will report back if changes are warranted,
Report prepared by:
Craig Mather, extension 240
B370 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
.......- ....... wrrAlUO CCIISDVA~OJI AG'fJIDIl%h
..
laB, A.....C 1%, 1'''-
ny, -OY~D IT c....o~
S.L.
. PlUt.
IIDIl) !D. I.. ~., lOIlQ. r. JIIac:aaO, DC&. G. \Iaollt . &. va.. t.DCA,
c. MaClte~ . R. J.~~ee. IIftCa
CD v. "rroa. cvca
..., 01.8. r-J,l, OLal o\dII.1..ucnu... 0!t1c:u
~I _ ~ ~CiGa A_Ci_
-~--_1. .d_
- ..--..- aDd 1IDII1.-.r~ r~ .... a..t._
Jlaf erencr. 18 aad. CO ., 1ftCU of .1UJ. Y 12, 1_ eo .u_
~.ct aD Cll. .- _ecu-, - WriOJlJe ..... 1 nIt.lqDel\uy had
.. -""""~cy ea c11acu.. - ..itJt. ....n. <:earvi.tt. U&u UMl
.uu. - ..... e taJ.l__ e.-.r1a.. ~ Caqll"" OD vaewe - 90
e... _..
1. ftla ;oa~Cll'r8lU.p _r.nd_ "U1 'lO to Dun.. Req~"" - ~ce_
... ~l - eIU.. tau. pel<!l.p. .. ear.!. y .. S.pc~.r Jrd.
II: -.1d De ~aad cJ..''''l it . propa_ Dull.. Keq.on C.A." t_
8CllIectala cauld be an '~ny."" cSocua.n~ , ."... ~t .. aD
1.ato..:aaCJ.oft :.~ :az d1acuaaiOll..
2. lie alwnUd :ry callaacJ.vely CO .,.e _Cllinq oue .... ell. d.....1o_e
.l.Ddu.auy .. .00II .. ;>>O..J.bl. NI Vie h.... ~ .l..wa 011 :econ.
3. lIUfta8 P1.....LDq I'ec:~u Mell C,A. ~. ~u - W.&.D...
-- co .UlIpor~ ell. t_ ac!urdal\11. pr.~.raoJ.y .J. Clli.D a 'fenar.a.c
tr-.-..
4. DlW.... PlaJlD1nq -...ld UIt. CO - "'" C,A, e_ Si1:r'QC"'CUZ'. De
raa....dJ.y caaaJ.s~eat. "~ell wIl.e t:llay an d_lO\>.... tII__l v..
_ wi Cll wtt.~...r c_. iDea .t U..... ill tfte QtJIeZ toS Reqian. ,
D'DZ'haa P 1.aIulJ.nq 8U99..1: "fie ba.... :.hrIM ~~S - 'l.D lteYi..,
ftcftIUcaJ. ..po~ lIIev1..... and Plan ..... TacluUcaJ. C1_ranca. rIl.
propoeecl ,e.. S'U\lC"':t.IZW .b1c.ft !o1J.owe tll.. ~c. tozmac.
~ ~ ~ f'Oa ADAS OJ' novIJR:UL !JIft"!I:II:BS - -
1. __ avuw PD
C bo be ooll_~ by _ lleqiaD .e ~ ol! .ppllcaCicaI
'Mun1cl~l 0!t1cial P1... , 0.00
.MQD~e1p.l ~ff1c~~! Plan ~n~n~ , 0,00
.'riv.... Ottlcial Plan ~ftdaan~ , lea ,eo/.ppl1cauOft
..1&8 at 5ubd1v1.~c" , 50 ,OO/lo~
"lAD at Caad081nlu. luse ,eO/ha
.r.ad 01.,.1.10n 1 100.eO/lO<:
:I. ~ClL ~ JlB9%" ra
(bo be ~~... by t:be C..... .e ~ ol! ~ ~.._I
.aa..nar Z'epor't 1 200.00
._Jar c~r~ 12000 ,CO
...jo~ r.paze/c08p1.z '5000 ,00
~1caJ. R.poru ~ypic.llr ar. prapuad co adlU... iaau.. ..1aueS
CD,
AI llACuraJ. lI.ritaq.
- ..... AD.~, Siqnitlcaac lfUc11H. lI.biu~. "alleylAft4., .-.:". .
-~, 1fec.1..anda , .... _'U'. __._m - ........m 'f;!
tpecJ..., .eoc. :~ ~ i
- ..
CDD:c..4.__._....~ \, ; .
-,... ~....
...".. ..
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B371
- ~ -
II' NearaJ. .....rd.
..
- ..., .1-..." noU., S101M IUtall1UU... .ce.
A ~._ue.h. u..UDq at ta. _.ta! type. at ~llIucal R_na
ta... ~d lie _UecI to ~. a' ad In -.. -u 1AaJ.ode,
- 1a ooe __d1y Uaa.ted t,"
. ~ I_ce AalI.._ (.eeuu1 t..cu.. _ t_......_.,
. ._e~ __e nudh. I..e... cruUty aDd _ty,
, ~1e :-ue1'lee1_ I_..ee...,
. ~1c1101b R.~e. ,__ _ "_ nalol.Utyl
. c-.ul ....u..nn. J1:adt..
. P~pJ.a1a SbolU..
. _ ~t1_ .laa.
. ~- - ~.. Coaua1 .1....
ftc.. "'''''01'1.. at ~na1caJ. II4IOort rw91_ t... .... ..ulIUooIlecl,
ta T ._~. eae ..C'J".Uoaa 18 ea. ecue, 4.~ &ad ~ea.a.~y
<d eIMo npan. tllac _y be ~equJ.I'ed.
. lIiDo1' r_ru ...."1d Il-u,y includ. .l'oe~OJl and ~ae
c:anuo.l. p.Laall, er... c:GIlM.....UOll llJ.an. and -.u s"au 'eq.
IIJ.oc:Ic d_.I.o_e. saa.1l site OJI'A' S. 01' ( 10 1.ot. s1&bd1 Y1a.l.oaa'
.c.oz.w.:et "IAD.Aq_nc. or ~ ntparta.
. ft. _jor r_~ c.U'Iory -..J.d aQply ........ _c at tIl.
.....~1:a.1 concerns .I'e relAt.ed :0 :.lie prooosed deY.J.o~n~
nt. it..U . "~Cb liar. ted perl:8l.l ved 1.At lu,ence ott-a.l.u.
~'C.I' _n.9_n: :'e1lOrt. tllac are d....l~ .... CIU.D tIl.
~rl< o~ ... .a1.UIl'l lIQheunned/eaac" uuaa.,. lllaa
......us 9_ewaJ.ly !a.U. 1.1I~ tJU. ca~orr.
. ..~O.. l'eoort/~l.a ""OUld ~. '=!Io8e :~~. wttere bro.der
~ ...c be -.- _C11 ....,...d ... po.....u.a1 o1!-a1'C.
~~. ~J... lIIOQ14 Laclude, .ltonIwa~ .....,__ft .cwu...
-... ~. .....t a _11 d_loped ... tUu4I'IY 0" aauClJI'l'
..~ ~ual t.arvet.a. ew.1ron..llc.al !ape"" ....--.su ........
nu _l_c ~c... ..y a~tllCC tA4I lJIU'lnl'y of tIuo br_d...
~_D...ll'f Mne1t1". an.. ADd/or f~.lcma. ...... eaJ.
_1Ilee"~ ICucu... aDd 1Iyck"'l...l",,~c .euc:ti.. e&aaa.nuq
~./cU..achar.,. l:OftD~.1an.. wit:.h ....~c :'eHU'cea.
3. JI.aaz.G ~ 'nIC2IIItOL ~1I1l.-..c:.
lto be c:ollecellCl l>f eIMo C.A. at: tile u- at cIo:atl: pJ.an aleanacel
. '1&11 o~ SUDdt7t.~01l , 50.00/10t
. .l&a ot Cond~n1um J1250,OOlha
. %.aDd Dtvtnon , 0,00
he. ~..l.~ed to necessary C.A, penu t. under Cbur own
~t:.10D./pol1ci... or tu tun del '"'laced r..pona4bl.U.Ua. ( LAJc..
ud UY4'%'. CO\&J.d ~ 1Acorpo~'ced 1nco tn.. abav. cae...
lIUhaa Jt...,.a.on U&II1l11l'l !lave W\~'Y ~1" o~ tJ\e.a.r 0WIl
I.. lUuC1:.url _ie."1 a vh.. ... _au, the t low .,re clo..l V
u.-d ea the IOCU&! war-x lo.d. They UI .1.0 looiu,nq .~ elM c:onc.~'!:
<d ~".1JI'1. to~ propon.n~. ../lo cIo a 'load aQpUc:.ouOll up '"oat
tbae doela1t l_d to . ""'1.. Qf ujcu ,.evtI1onl.
I IIocIw - ean .... . u_ 011 oar a,lnclA at ltT~ to.orrow ta
It... tbJ.. "1:1:" . review.
a./Ua
B372 EXECl,JTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96. AUGUST 16,1996
RES #8112/96- APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on
a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules
whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from
some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse,
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation
of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected,
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THA T permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (7.3,1, -
7,3.25) with the exception of Permit 7.3.5 - Humber Flats and 7.3.11 - Mississauga Hydro. and 7.3.21
- The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. which are listed below.. , , , , , , . . , . , , , . , , . , CARRIED
RE~19.6- PERMIT 7.3.5 HUMBER FLATS
Moved by: Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THA T a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for Permit 7.3,5 - Humber Flats,
which is listed below . , . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . , , . . . , . . . , . . . . . . , . . . , , . . , . . CARRIED
RES #8114/96 - PERMIT 7.3.11 MISSISSAUGA HYDRO
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THA T a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for Permit 7.3.5 - Humber Flats
and 7.3.11 - Mississauga Hydro. which is listed below. , . . . . , , . . . . . , . . . . , . , . . . . , . . CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B373
(7 3 1) ThE! City of Rr;impton
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on Part Lot 7. Concessions 8
and 9 EHS, (McVean Drive north of Highway 7), in the City of Brampton, Humber River
Watershed as located on property owned by same and MTRCA,
The purpose is to reconstruct the existing McVean Drive bridge, undertake grading works and alter a
watercourse associated with the reconstruction of McVean Drive in the regulated area and flood plain
of the West Humber River.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Falby Burnside and Associates; Contract 96-107; Drawing N3-8, Sheets 1,
2,3,4,5,6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11; dated May 30, 1996; received June 13, 1996, (Total
Drawings 11)
(2) Geotechnical Assessment; prepared by Trow Consulting Engineers ltd.; dated July 9, 1996,
(3) Letter of Undertaking from Mr, Karl Un, p, Eng" Senior Project Engineer and Survey Manager of
the City of Brampton, Works and Transportation Department dated July 12, 1996,
(4) Clearway Construction ltd., Drawing MS-1 01, dated received by MTRCA July 29, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!>;il:
The existing bridge on McVean Drive at the West Humber River is being reconstructed which involves a
watercourse alteration and regrading works in the flood plain and regulated area of the West Humber
River, The works include new road embankments and the relocation of the existing channel under the
bridge to address erosion at the location of the north abutment, Part of the road embankment works
are located on lands owned by MTRCA, An easement in favour of the City for this work was approved
at Authority Meeting #6/96 (July 26, 1996),
.control of Flooding'
Part of the works include raising the road profile, The proponent's consultant has undertaken an
hydraulic analysis of the proposed bridge structure and road profile, The 23 metre span selected is
capable of conveying the Regional Storm without affecting flood risk on adjacent properties,
Eollution.:.
Sediment controls, including jersey barriers and staged construction, will be used to ensure
sedimentation loading to the watercourse will not occur,
Con!>E!rv;ition of I ;ind'
The City has prepared an inventory of existing vegetation that will be disturbed by the works and will
be providing a rehabilitation plan for the disturbed area, A pathway will be provided on the south side
of the channel, under the new bridge, to allow for future public access, A section of the existing
channel will be relocated to avoid a future erosion problem and will be re-established with native bed
materials and plantings,
B374 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996
Policy GlIirlp.linp.!,:'
The proposed works are in compliance with the Authority's approved Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program, Section 4,3 - Infrastructure and Servicing,
CFN: 27779 Application #:22/96/BRAM
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext, 281)
Date: 1996,07.24
(7 3?) P:'IlIl :'Inri IO:'ln Horwoorl
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 3, Concession 1 SDS, (1690 Sherway Drive), in
the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same,
The purpose is to place fill to level grades in a regulated area of the Etobicoke Creek,
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plan; prepared by applicant; received July 17, 1996.
(2) Cross-section prepared by applicant; received July 31, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpo!'::'II:
To place approximately 150 m3 of fill in a regulated area of the Etobicoke Creek in order to eliminate an
existing depression and level the grades on the subject residential property, The depression was
originally a pond and is currently used as a compost pit, No watercourse IS associated with the former
pond,
l. 0 ntrn l...oLFlo.odlng..:.
The area is not located within the flood plain,
Polllltion'
Due to the nature of the grades in the area, sedimentation will not be a concern,
l.on!,:p.rv:'Ition of I :'Inri'
The fill placement will not result in the removal of existing woody vegetation on the property, The area
to be filled is located on tableland approximately 5 metres from the top of bank and will not impact
stability of the existing Etobicoke Creek valley,
Policy GlIirlp.linp.!,:'
The proposal complies with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section
4.2.2,(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures.
CFN: 28083 Application #: 141 /96/MISS
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext, 281)
Date: 1996,07,24
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B375
(7 3 3) Thp. l.ity of MI5:5:i5:5:::IlIg::l
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 7, Concession 2 NOS, (Little Etobicoke Creek), in the City of
Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake sediment removal works at five road culverts on the Little Etobicoke
Creek, between Eastgate Parkway and Rathburn Road, in order to maintain conveyance capacity,
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Location plans; prepared by applicant, dated April 17, 1996 (total plans 2).
(2) Letter regarding sediment controls, from J. Teare, P.Eng., Manager, Environmental Engineering,
City of Mississauga, dated July 25, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prn po 5:::1 I :
To undertake sediment removal at five road culverts on the Little Etobicoke Creek, The works
proposed are part of the City's 1996 maintenance works,
l.ontrnl of Baociing:
The proposed works will not affect the control of flooding,
Polllltion'
Sediment controls including partial diversions and coffer dams will be installed to prevent
sedimentation problems,
Consp.rv::Ition of I ::Inri'
No existing vegetation will be removed as a result of the proposed works,
Eolir.y Gllirlp.hnp.5:
The proposal complies with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program section 4,3
- Infrastructure and Servicing,
CFN: 28117 ApplicatIOn #: 152/96/MISS
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext, 281)
Date: 1996.07,29
B376 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
(7 ::! 4) 10fi::!07R Ont::uin I tci
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 15, Concession 7, (Islington A venue\
Rutherford Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by same,
The purpose is to regrade in a Fill Regulated Area and to construct an overland flow outfall to a
tributary of the Humber River in order to facilitate the development of a residential subdivision.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 2001 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; prepared by V.A. Piscione and Associates Ltd.; Project 94-157; Drawing 94-157--9
dated July 22, 1996; Drawing 94-157-2 dated June 27, 1996. (Total Drawings 2).
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
EroposaJ :
To regrade in a regulated area for rear lot grading and to construct an overland flow (major system)
outfall to the valley of a tributary of the Humber River in order to facilitate the development of a draft
plan of subdivision (19T-9201 0), The major system outfall consists of a reverse catch basin Inlet and
rip rap apron to allow diffusion of flows,
r.nntrnl nf Flnnciing'
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm flood plain, The grading and overland
flow route will allow for major system drainage in accordance with the approved stormwater
management report for the plan. Minor system flows will be directed to an existing storm sewer
system,
Eoll~
Sediment controls including siltation fencing and a rock check dam at the outlet will be utilized during
construction,
eoJiG-Guidelin.es;
The works are in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program,
Section 4,1,1 - New Development
CFN: 28070 Application #: 135/96/V AUG
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext, 281)
Date: 1996,07.23
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B377
(7 ~ 5) Hllmhp.r FI::Itl': (Fip.lelg::ltp. Dp.vp.lopmp.nt ::Inel Conl':trur.tion I tel ' Roelrington Dp.vp.lopmp.nt I tel ' 145
Wp.llington C::Ipit::l1 Inr. )
To place fill in a regulated area, to alter a watercourse and to construct in a flood plain on Part
lots 67, 68, 69 and 70, Concession 1 WYS, (east side of Bathurst Street, south of
Bloomington Sideroadl, in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to alter a small intermittent watercourse, place fill and regrade to create an ecological
linkage between three environmental features and to construct a stormwater management pond to
service an adjacent residential development.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 2001 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) South Extended Detention Pond Plan; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather; Contract 96339;
Drawing SW1-R1; dated June 1996,
(2) Extended Pond Details; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather; Contract 96339; Drawing SW2-
R1; dated June 1996.
(3) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather; Contract 96339;
Drawing ESC-1; dated June 1996.
(4) Erosion and Sediment Control Details; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather; Contract 96339;
Drawing ESC-2; dated June 1996.
(5) Ecopark Grading Plan; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather; Contract 96339; Drawings EP-1.
EP-2. EP-3. EP-4 and EP-5; dated June 1996,
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Erop.o.sal :
In November 1993, the Town of Richmond Hill adopted Official Plan Amendment 129, This
amendment establishes planning principles, objectives, policies and a land use plan for the north Urban
Development Area, This area is known as the lake Wilcox-Oak Ridges Secondary Plan,
Specific policies of OPA 129 set out requirements for further studies necessary to receive draft plan
approvals. Prior to consideration of draft plans, a "Functional ServIcing Plan" (FSP) must be prepared
on a subwatershed basis, A FSP was prepared to identify opportunities and constraints and to
establish servicing and open space requirements for the Humber Flats Neighbourhood. The Humber
Flats Neighbourhood is located on the east side of Bathurst Street, south of Bloomington Sideroad, and
north of the Humber River. The Humber Flats Functional Servicing Plan and plans of subdivision, of
which there are three, have all recently been granted approval by the Ontario Municipal Board,
B378 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
Three portions of the Humber Flats site were identified within OPA 129 as Environmental Protection
Areas and they are known as (1) Mallard Marsh, (2) Cardinal Woods/Wetland and (3) Humber River
Corridor. OPA 129 also encourages that these three environmental features be linked through the
creation of new environmental restoration areas, The only existing linkage is a small intermittent creek
which links the Mallard Marsh, located along Bloomington Sideroad, to the Humber River which forms
the southerly boundary of the site, The proposal is to improve this linkage and add approximately 14
ha, of additional linkages by creating an ecological park, This ecological park will consist of a ring of
open space linking the three designated environmental protection areas in the Humber Flats
development, The open space linear areas will have an average width of 60 metres and contain a new
meandering natural channel to convey runoff from the subdivisions, The ecological park is a multi-use
open space system providing management of stormwater and enhancement of shallow groundwater
flows, as well as providing a variety of habitats and a pedestrian trail system,
In addition to the construction of the ecological park, the proponent also proposes to construct a wet
extended stormwater management detention pond sized to treat runoff generated by a 25 mm rainfall
event and release it over a 24 hour period to provide sediment removal and erosion control for the East
Humber River. The proposed pond will be located at the outlet of the ecological park to the Humber
River. The pond will consist of a excavated wetland feature located outside the 100 year flood plain
and a minimum distance of 30 metres from the channel of the Humber River.
Cnntrol nf Flnnning'
There will be no impact on the control of flooding, All fill placement will be compensated with a
matching cut in the same general area,
Pnlllltinn'
Sedimentation barriers will be installed prior to any construction taking place. All
erosion/sedimentation control measures will be inspected regularly and maintained, Restorative
seeding and planting will take place immediately after grading,
Cnm:p.rv::Itinn nf I ::Inn'
The proposal involves extensive restoration plantings in the newly created ecological park,
Pnhr.y Gllinp.linp.~'
The proposal complies with Section 3,3 - Watercourse Alterations; Section 4,1,2 - New Resource
Based Uses; and Section 4,3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program, The proposal is also in compliance with OPA 129 and the approved
EnvIronmental Master Servicing Plan,
CFN: 28037 Application #: 119/96/RH
For information contact: Barry Knox (ext. 268)
Date: 1996,07.31
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B379
(7 ~ R) Minto\M;lrkh;lm P;lrtnp.r!':hip I trl
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 5, 6, 7, 8, Concession 8, (IBM Golf Course), in the Town of
Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same,
The purpose is to construct a storm water management pond and outfall.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Minto Markham Partnership - Tomlinson Pond; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather Ltd.;
Project #93007, Drawing No. 608; received July 8, 1996.
(2) Red Line Revision, Minto Markham Partnership - Tomlinson Pond; prepared by Cosburn
Patterson Mather Ltd.; Project #93007, Drawing Nos. 607, 609; received July 8, 1996,
(3) Minto Markham Partnership - Tomlinson Pond Landscape Plans; prepared by Cosburn Giberson
Ltd.; Project #95-1109, Drawing Nos. RP4, RW1, RW2; received July 26, 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Propo!,:;lI:
In order to service a new residential subdivision, the developer is proposing to retrofit an existing golf
course pond to a water quality control facility, The pond is designed to treat the 25 mm rain event and
detain the storm water over a 48 hr. period. Water quantity control in not required for this site, A new
outfall channel and outlet will be constructed to the river.
Control of Floorling.
The pond, which is located between the 100 year flood line and the Regional storm flood hne, is to be
deepened and all the excavate will be removed from the flood plain, The proposal will not affect the
control of flooding.
EolIutio.o.:
There is no existing outlet to the watercourse, The existing pond will be pumped out prior to
excavation, The outfall will be constructed following the proposed excavation work, Sediment fence
will be installed between the pond and the watercourse prior to initiation of the work, All disturbed
areas will be restored immediately following the construction of the pond. There will be no work In the
watercourse,
Con!':erv;ltion of I ;Inri.
Because the area is an existing golf course, there are no significant natural resource features on the
site, The pond is located more than 30 m from the watercourse, The pond area, outlet channel and
nparian area at the outfall is to be planted with native woody riparian vegetation, The Town of
Markham is proposing a public trail system through this area in the future.
Poli~y l,lIirlelinp.!,:'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4,3 Infrastructure and ServiCing,
CFN: 28808 Application #: 142/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext, 304)
Date: 1996,08,01
B380 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
17 ~ 7) I p.njn Fntp.rrri~p.~ I imitp.rI
To construct in the flood plain on Part Lot 8 and Block A, Registered Plan 4087, (Thermos
Road), in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located on property owned by
Canadian Pacific Limited.
The purpose is to construct an office building and a parking lot in the flood plain on lands previously
used to provide train cargo service,
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan and Elevations; prepared by V. W. Kuchar and Associates, Architects Ltd.;
Project #5-032; Drawing A-1, dated June 12, 1992; received June 24, 1992.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnrn~::JI:
At Executive Committee Meeting 2/93, Permit C-93043 was approved which allowed for the
redevelopment of a train cargo service area to an office building and parking lot in the flood plain of the
Highland Creek, The lands are being sold, and the new owners plan to undertake the same project and
have made a permit application in this regard. A new permit is necessary to address this change In
ownership,
ControlDf Flnnrling.
All openings in the proposed building will be above the Regional Storm Flood elevation, In addition, the
proposed parking area will be wet floodproofed.
Eal1uti.on:.
The site is not near the watercourse, There is no risk of pollution from the proposed construction,
C:nn~p.rv::Jtian nf I ::Jnrl'
There are no significant resource features on this site,
Eolky GlIirlp.lines:
The site is located within a highly urbanised area in the City of Scarborough, Authority staff are
working with the City to finalise a Special Policy Area designation that would include this site.
CFN: 28116 Application #: 153/96/SCAR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine lext. 304)
Date: 1996,08,02
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B381
(7 3 8) ThF! Mllnicip::Ility of MF!tropolit::ln Toronto
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 18, Concession 2, (east of Markham Road, south of
Progress Avenue), in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located on
property owned by MTRCA,
The purpose is to ratify the construction of two rocky ramps that were constructed to protect a
sanitary sewer exposed in the watercourse,
The work was completed in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of
this permit:
(1) East Highland Creek Sanitary Sewer Emergency Erosion Protection, Prepared by Metro Works
System and Services, received December 13, 1995.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Eropasa1:
In the early winter of 1995, a sanitary sewer was exposed in the stream bed of the Highland Creek at
two locations within the Authority's ESA 77, Because it was considered an emergency, the proposed
repair work was reviewed quickly and the works were undertaken in January of this year.
r.ontrol of Flooriing'
The works do not affect the control of flooding,
Polllltion'
The construction required that equipment work in the watercourse, To mitigate sediment suspension
the equipment was positioned on a river run stone pad.
Because the valley slopes are steep and heavily vegetated, two ford crossings of the watercourse were
necessary to access the sites. To mitigate sedimentation in the watercourse, the number of times
equipment crossed was limited and the crossings were located at sites where the bed of the
watercourse was covered with cobbles and stones,
r.onsF!rv::Ition of I ::Inri'
Staff were satisfied with the works as they were designed and constructed to provide fish passage
while protecting the exposed sewer.
Because of the status of the area as an ESA, MTRCA staff are finalising discussions to work with
Metro staff (on a cost recovery basis) to restore the area With woody native planting and seeding,
Eolicy GlliriF!linF!s'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4,3 Infrastructure and Servicing,
CFN: 27642 Application #: 253/95/SCAR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext, 304)
Date: 1996,08.02
B382 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
(7 3~) Rp.gion of nurh;im
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 17,18 and 19, Concession 8 and 9, (Centre Street, Village
of Claremont), in the Town of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on property
owned by same,
The purpose is to undertake drainage ditch and storm sewer improvements resulting from the widening
of Central Street in the Village of Claremont,
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; Regional Road No.5 from 350 m west of Canso Drive to Brock Road and Construction
Details; prepared by Paul Theil and Associates; drawing P-96-R-385 to
P-96-R-389; received July 25, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
&op.asal :
The Region of Durham is proposing to widen Central Street, This work is not within a regulated area;
however, drainage ditch storm sewer improvements are also being done and these outlet to two
tributaries of the Duffins Creek, The ditch system will be largely maintained with the exception of a
small section which will be converted to a storm sewer to alleviate local flooding concerns of the
residents. In addition, a small amount of overland flow will be diverted from one drainage basin to
another also to reduce nuisance flooding,
l.ontrol nf Flnnrling'
A hydraulic analysis was undertaken to assess the impacts on the watercourses, The control of
flooding will not be affected by this work,
Pnlhltinn'
Check dams will be placed in the ditches, and the ditches will be sodded immediately following the
work to control sediment,
Consp.rv;itinn of I ;inrl'
Under the Environmental Assessment process the Region initiated a public consultation process and
examined alternative storm water practices before making a decision on the design of this road and
storm system, The design has resulted in an improvement in water quality treatment, and has dealt
with local flooding concerns.
Pnlicy GlIirlp.linp.!,:'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing,
CFN: 28051 Application #: 123/96/PICK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext, 304)
Date: 1996,07,26
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B383
17.3, 1 OIThomoson Homes 1111489 Ontario Ltd,
To construct in the flood plain on Part Lot 2 and Part Lot 17, Concession 1, Registered Plan
469, (19B5 and 1987 Southview Drive), in the Town of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed
as located on property owned by same,
The purpose is to construct two houses in the flood plain.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site and Lot Grading Plan, Pt. Lot 2, Reg. Plan 469, Town of Pickering, Prepared for
Thompson Homes by E. W. Bower Inc" Revised July 22, 1996, Received July 24, 1996.
(2) Red Line Revision, Elevations Plans for 1985 and 1987 Southview Drive, Select Home
Designs, Plan # 93-1417, received July 24, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
The applicant is proposing to construct two new homes on existing residential lots in the Special
Policy Area in Pickering on the Duffins Creek. The Authority completed the construction of a flood
control berm in the mid 1980's to provide 500 year protection to this SPA community; however,
the SPA policies require additional flood-proofing behind the berm.
Control of Floodina:
The Regional Storm Flood elevation is 84.27 m CGD. The proposed houses are to be flood
protected to 82.71 m CGD and located above the 350 year storm elevation of 81.83 m. Additional
flood protection was not possible because of requirements to connect to existing roads and
services,
Pollution:
The proposal will not introduce sediment to the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The lots are located within an established residential area. There are no significant natural resource
features on these sites,
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.2.1 (B) Development Guidelines within Special Policy Areas and
the Special Policy Area policies outlined in OPA 023 for the Town of Pickering.
CFN: 28103 Application #: 149/96/PICK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.07.31
B384 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
(7 3 11 )Mi~~i!':!':allga Hydrn
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 11, Concession 7 EHS, (Derry Greenway Park),
in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on property owned by MTRCA,
The purpose is to undertake trenching in a Fill Regulated Area and flood plain of the Mimico Creek in
order to construct a buried duct bank,
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998,
(1) Plans; prepared by Hydro Mississauga, Work Order 96-5271-1; Drawing 007-48-202-0; dated
May 27, 1996; received June 7, 1996. (Total Drawings 1)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnro~al:
To construct a 13,8 kv duct bank in Derry Greenway Park, The works involve trenching for the duct
bank from Derry Road to Victory Crescent and fastening the duct bank to an eXisting pedestrian bridge,
l.ontrnl of Flooding:
No grade changes are proposed within the flood plain. The control of flooding will not be affected,
Polllltion'
All areas to be disturbed by the trenching will be restored, No in-water works are required.
Conservation of I and'
The Mimico Creek valley is not well-defined in this location, No existing woody plant material will be
disturbed as a result of the works,
Polir.y Gllidelines.:
The proposal complies with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section
4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, The work requires an easement from MTRCA as the works will
cross Authority lands, This easement request is the subject of a report on Part 1 of this agenda,
Approval of this application is dependant on approval of the easement report,
CFN: 28013 Application #:107/96/MISS
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext, 281)
Date: 1996,07,24
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B385
(7 ~ 1 ?)!:;tnckwnrth DnblE! DE!vE!lnpmE!nt~ Inc
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on Part Lot 25, Concession 4,
(south side of Teston Road between Jane and Keele Streets), in the City of Vaughan, Don River
Watershed as located on property owned by same,
The purpose is to construct a bridge, replace an existing culvert and construct a stormwater
management pond on a tributary of the Don River (West Branch) in order to facilitate the development
of a residential subdivision (19T -94044),
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 2001,
(11 Plans; prepared by EMC Group Limited; Drawing 96114-3 Revision 1 dated April 30, 1996;
Drawings 961 14-CD1, 961 14-CD2, 961 14-GR1, 961 14-GR2, and 961 14-GR3 dated March
1996; received May 3, 1996; Drawings 961 14-ES Revision 1 dated July 9, 1996, 96130-P1
dated April 1996,961 14-P3 Revision 1 dated July 3, 1996,96130-501 dated April 1996;
received August 9, 1996. (Total Drawings 10)
(2) Letter from Jonathan McKie, Senior Landscape Architect, EMC Group Limited, File 96120-
Ll96114-L, dated July 19,1996; received July 23,1996. (Total Documents 11
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Eroposa1:
To construct a bridge structure of the Don River tributary, replace an existing municipal culvert on
Teston Road and construct a stormwater quality pond and outfall as part of the development of the
Maple Meadows subdivision (19T-94044).
C:nntrnl nf Flnnrling'
The proposed bridge crossing is designed to convey Regional Storm flows, The bridge opening will
span the pre-development 25 year flood line. The culvert replacement under Teston Road is being
undertaken at the request of the municipality and will maintain the existing flow capacity, The
stormwater quality pond will provide 25 mm, 24 hour detention for the site, Quantity control is
provided by a central facility located downstream in the Mackenzie Glen subdiVision.
Eollu.t.io.n:
An erosion and sediment control plan has been submitted indicating measures to control sedimentation
during construction for all three aspects of the work as well as the site grading, This plan has been
reviewed and found acceptable by staff,
C:nn~E!rv~tinn nf I ~nrl'
The proposal includes both a valleyland restoration planting plan and a stormwater management pond
planting plan, These have been reviewed and found acceptable by Authority staff,
Eo.li c y c:; II i r1.e.lines:
The proposed works are in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program, Section 4,1,1 - New Development and Section 4,3 - Infrastructure and Servicing,
CFN: 27961 Application #:85/96/VAUG
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext, 281)
Date: 1996,07,24
B386 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
(7 3 13)Fp.lgi Invp.~tmp.nt~ I trl,
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 23, Concession 2 , (west of Bayview, north of Major
Mackenzie Drive), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on
property owned by same,
The purpose is to construct a storm water quantity control and water quality treatment pond to
facilitate the construction of adjacent residential development,
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 2001,
(1 ) Stormwater Management Pond, Site Plan, Sections and Details; prepared by Fred Schaeffer &
Assoc.; Contract 95-E-1768; Drawings 2, 3, 4 and 5; received August 13, 1996. (Total
Drawings 4)
(2) Stormwater Management Pond Landscape Plans & Details; prepared by M.M, Dillan; Contract
95-2848; Drawings l1 and l2; received August 9, 1996. (Total Drawing 2)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Eropasal:
The applicant is proposing to construct a stormwater management pond within the valley of the Rouge
River. The site of the pond was agreed to through discussion on the Master Environmental Servicing
Plan for OPA 121, The pond is designed to detain the 25 mm rainfall event over 48 hours for water
quality treatment and the five year storm event for erosion control.
Control of Floorling'
The pond is to be located within the flood plain but outside of the 100 year flood line, Because of
ground water conditions, the pond can only be partially excavated and a berm is required. A hydraulic
analysis has demonstrated that there is no significant change in flood levels under Regional Storm
conditions because of the proposed design,
Polhltion'
A sediment fence will be installed prior to construction to contain sediment on site, All disturbed areas
will be stabilised uSing seed or mulch as soon as the work is complete,
Con~p.rv:ltion of I :Inri'
Presently, the site of the pond is in agriculture; however, there is well established woody riparian
vegetation within 10m of the watercourse, The pond is located 30 m from the watercourse, There
are no well defined valley slopes at this site, No significant natural resources will be affected by the
construction of this pond,
Because the Rouge River is type 1 fish habitat, the Ministry of Natural Resources has required that a
monitoring program be established to confirm the effectiveness of the pond. Phosphorus, nitrates,
total suspended solids and biological oxygen demand will be monitored over a three year period,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B387
Poli~y r;lIideline!':'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing and the Master Environmental Servicing Plan for
OP A 121,
CFN:27535 Application #: 224/95/RH
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, Ext, 304
Date: 1996,07.24
(7 :l 14)M;ug;uet I ;III
To place fill within a regulated area, alter a watercourse and construct in a flood plain on Lot
12, Registered Plan 5455, (29 Alderbrook Drivel, in the City of North York, Don River
Watershed as located on property owned by same and Metro Works,
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place fill material to address streambank erosion, to
construct a post and wire fence and to replace an existing foot bridge within the Regional Storm flood
plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Wilket Creek,
The permit will be Issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998,
(1 ) Letter of Intent from Mark Schollen of Todhunter, Scholl en and Associates, signed by Ms.
Margaret Lau, dated July 15,1996; received July 19, 1996. (Total Document 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Eroposa1:
The proposal consists of constructing erosion protection along both streambanks of the Wilket Creek
which bisects the subject property, Other proposed works involve the replacement of an existing foot
bridge spanning the watercourse and constructing a post and wire, farm-type fence east of the stream,
The area of construction is located entirely within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated
Area of the Wilket Creek,
Control of Flooding'
The existing eroding streambanks will be cut back to a 2:1 (H:V) gradient which will improve the
hydraulic capacity of the channel at this location, Fill placement will be limited to restoring the
disturbed areas adjacent to the channel. The erosion control works will result in removing fill from the
flood plain; all other grades will be maintained at pre-development levels, The proposed bridge
structure will span the channel and its footings will be set back from the newly shaped streambanks,
with the approaches occurring at-grade, The proposed fence will be located outside the hydraulic
floodway, Staff has confirmed that the proposal will not result in increased flooding on upstream,
downstream or adjacent lands,
Eollu.ti.an:
Streamflow will be diverted during construction by isolating the work area with an impermeable coffer
dam, The area behind the coffer dam will be dewatered, With pumped flow directed through filter
fabric bags or another suitable method,
B388 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16,1996
r.om::p.rv::Ition of I ::Inri'
The material to be used for protecting the reshaped streambanks will consists of round field boulders
and river-run stone, sized to withstand the expected velocities or flow (ie. 400 millimetre to 600
millimetre diameter). The same material will be used in the channel bottom in order to dissipate the
energy created by the extreme velocities, while at the same time creating aquatic habitat, The majority
of existing woody vegetation adjacent to the watercourse will remain undisturbed; the ten metre
riparian zone on both sides of the Wilket Creek will be vegetated with native trees and shrubs,
Poli~y GlIirlp.linp.s'
The proposal complies with Section 3,3, - PoliCies and Procedures for identifying Watercourses and
Alterations - and Section 4,2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program,
CFN: 27488 Application #: 201/95/NY
For information contact: George Leja (ext, 342)
Date: 1996.07,26
(7 ::! 15)Thp. r.ity of North York
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 7, Concession 3 WHS, (North Park), in the City of North
York, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same,
The purpose is to undertake channelization works on a tributary of the Black Creek,
The permit will be Issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998.
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Harrington and Hoyle Ltd.; Project 95-36; Drawings L 1, L2 and L3; dated
revised August 8, 1996, (Total Drawings 3)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
&o.posal :
To undertake natural channel design on a reach of a tributary of the Black Creek to provide erosion
protection to an eXisting sanitary sewer located in North Park. The naturalized channel will replace an
existing gabion-lIned channel. The proposed channel will have a meander amplitude and low flow
channel width based on the upstream drainage area, The low flow channel will be asymmetric to re-
create natural conditions and will have banks stabilized with natural biotechnical materials, including
brush mattresses and live fascines,
r.ontrol of Floorling'
The watercourse drains less than 125 hectares, An hydraulic analysis was not deemed necessary due
to the size of the drainage basin and the public ownership of adjacent lands,
Polllltion'
The relocated creek will be constructed in stages in order to ensure that sediments will not enter the
existing channel. Sedimentation fencing will be included in areas where the construction is adjacent to
the existing channel.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B389
Con!;p.rv:ltion of I ::mrl'
The proposed channel will be constructed using bioengineering techniques designed to ensure that the
channel configuration remains stable. Staff are satisfied that the works will address the existing
erosion problem with the sanitary sewer and will also allow increased natural regeneration of the park
area. Existing mature vegetation On the north side of the channel will also be preserved.
Poli~y l,lIirleline!;'
The works are in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program,
Section 4.3(0) - Remedial Erosion Control Works to protect existing services.
CFN: 27982 Application #:89/96/NY
For information COntact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.07.26
(7 ~ 1 fi)The MlIni~ir~lity of Metrorolit~n Toronto - Der~rtment of Work!;
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 37, Concession 3 FTB, (307 Rockcliffe Boulevard), in
the City of York, Humber River Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to replace the cOncrete box culvert roof slab over the Hillary Combined Trunk Sewer
within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Black Creek.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998.
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Metro Works - Engineering Division; Drawing 1056-0-16503, 1056-0-
16504; 1056-0-16505 and 1056-0-16506; dated April 1996; received June 28,1996. (Total
Drawings 4)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
PJ:Op.QSaI :
The proposal involves the replacement of a portion of the concrete box culvert roof slab of the Hillary
Combined Trunk Sewer, located within and adjacent to the Metro Works Rockcliffe Yard in the City of
York. The site is located within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Black Creek, but is not presently
fill regulated. Fill lines are proposed for this area as part of the Fill Regulation Extension Program.
Control of Floorling:
In order to achieve frost protection for the reconstructed roof slab, 300 cubic metres of fill material is
required, which will be used to create a mound of earth over the structure. Staff has confirmed that
flood elevations will not increase as a result of this work. Authority staff has worked with Metro staff
to minimize the fill required.
fullut.ion;.
The construction area is located approximately 500 metres from the Black Creek flood control channel.
Canserv:ltion of I ~nrl'
All filled and disturbed areas will be sodded or hydroseeded following final grading.
B390 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
e.alic-y l,llirleline!;'
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28066 Application #:131/96/YORK
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.07.23
a..~ 17)City of Toronto
To construct in a flood plain at the Queen Street Bridge over the Don River, in the City of
Toronto, DOn River Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a pedestrian stairway connection from the Queen Street bridge to the
existing bicycle trail adjacent to the Don River.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998.
(1 ) Queen Street Bridge Stairway Plan; prepared by Blackwell Engineering Ltd.; Drawings 5-101, 5-
102 and 5-103; as received July 8, 1996. (Total Drawings 3)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Eroposa1:
The applicant proposes to COnstruct a pedestrian stairway within the flood plain of the lower Don River.
The pedestrian stairway will extend from the Queen Street Bridge overpass to the riverbank of the DOn
River and will serve as a pedestrian linkage to the existing bicycle path.
Control of Floorling:
The box of the stairway will be within the Regional Storm flood plain. The stairway width is
approximately 3 feet wide. There will be no hydraulic impact.
fullutian:
Sediment fencing will be erected between the proposed works and the edge of the Don River and will
remain in place for the duration of the works.
Co n!;erv ~ti 0 lLoLLaod:
The site is currently utilized as a bicycle pathway and will not impact the existing riparian vegetation
adjacent to the Don River.
E.ali~y l,lIirleline!;'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 - Resource Based Uses within the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28078 Application #: 140/96/TOR
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.07.24
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B391
(7 ~ 18)D~niel~ ROllge Corror:ltion
To alter a watercourse On Part Lot 8 and 9, Concession 8, (east of Markham Road and north of
14th Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located On property owned
by same.
The purpose is to construct a wetland/pond to treat storm water.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998.
(1 ) Daniels Rouge Subdivision, Storm Water Management Wetland; prepared by David Schaeffer
Engineering Ltd; Project #96-30, Drawings 1,3, and 4; received July 17, 1996. (Total
Drawings 3)
(2) Daniels Rouge Subdivision" Storm Water Management Wetland; prepared by David Schaeffer
Engineering Ltd.; Project #96-30; Drawing 2; received August 13, 1996. (Total Drawings 1)
(3) Daniels Group Storm Water Management Pond and Outfall Landscape Plan; prepared by
Strybos Assoc. Ltd.; Project 1384; Drawings L 1 and L2; received July 26, 1996. (Total
Drawings 2)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Eroposa1:
A wetland/pond is proposed to be constructed within a valley corridor to treat storm water for water
quality to facilitate the development of an adjacent residential site. The wetland pond will treat the 25
mm storm event and detain the water over a 48 hour period. Water quantity control is not required for
this site.
Control of Floorling.:.
The wetland is to be located between the 100 year and Regional storm flood line, and excavated at
grade. All excavate will be removed from the flood plain. There will be nO impact On the control of
flooding.
fullutian:
Sediment fence will be installed around the site to contain sediment. There will be no work directly in
the Rouge River.
Con~erv~tion of I ~nrl'
The pond is to be located in an existing clearing, within a well vegetated valley corridor, and more than
30 m from the Rouge River.
Construction access down the valley slope and to the pond is by a driveway access to a former house
site. This driveway is to be widened slightly and used for maintenance of the pond/wetland and
outfall.
B392 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
The storm system is aligned along the same access road. The major system flow is directed via a pipe
down a gradually sloped section of the valley slope and outfalls to a remnant channel of the
watercourse in which it is conveyed to the Rouge River. The slope is heavily vegetated, and the
alignment of the outfall was chosen to avoid removal of significant vegetation. An energy dissipator
will be installed at the outlet to protect the channel from erosion.
The pond outfall is directed to the same remnant channel. Erosion is not an issue at the site of the
pond as outlet velocities are low.
The wetland will be planted with native emergent and submergent vegetation and surrounded by native
woody vegetation.
All disturbed areas will be seeded or sodded immediately following the work.
Poli~y l,lIirleline!;'
The work is in compliance with the Authority's valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as it
relates to Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28105 Application #: 148/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.08.01
(7 ~ 1 ~)Town oLMarkham
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 29, Concession 9 and 10, (10th Line south of 19th Avenue),
in the Town of Markham, Duffins Creek Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to replace an existing open foot box culvert which is failing with a new open foot box
culvert.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998.
(1 ) 10th Line Bridge, prepared by Totten Sims Hubicki Associates; Drawings # 1, 2, and 9;
received May 29, 1996. (Total Drawings 3)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
.&aposal :
The Town of Markham is proposing to replace an open foot box culvert which is failing with a new
open foot box culvert on a tributary of Duffins Creek.
ControLof Floorling'
The proposed culvert is designed with the same hydraulic capacity as the existing culvert. There will
be nO impact on the control of flooding.
Eallutian;
The work will be done in the dry. Sediment fencing will be installed between the work site and the
watercourse and check dams will be installed in the ditches that are to be regraded. These practices
will prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B393
Con~F!rv~tion of I ~nrl'
The design of the new culvert requires that the watercourse be realigned. Because of the sensitive
fishery, fish habitat compensation was required for this project. A compensation package has been
agreed to between the Town and the Ministry of Natural Resources.
A portion of the stream bank upstream of the culvert is to be protected from erosion with large
boulders, deflection logs and root wads according to bioengineering design principles.
The stream bed will be lined with river run stone and the disturbed area planted with seed and woody
native riparian vegetation.
Poli~y l,lIirleline!;'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 25857 Application #: 238/93/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1998.08.02
.Q...3.2O.lRegionaLMlIni~ir~lity of York
To alter a watercourse and place fill in a regulated area on Part Lot 16, Concession 5, (North
side of 16th Avenue between Warden Avenue and Kennedy Road), in the Town of Markham,
Rouge River Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to install a new watermain along the north side of 16th Avenue.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 2001.
(1 ) 16th Avenue Watermain, Warden Avenue to Kennedy Road; prepared by MacViro Consultants
Inc.; Drawings P3 & P6; received July 25, 1996. (Total Drawings 2)
(2) Landscape Specifications; 16th Avenue Watermain Warden Avenue to Kennedy Road; prepared
by Region of York; received July 25, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
A new watermain is proposed to be constructed along the north side of 16th Avenue to service new
development to the north. The watermain will cross the Bruce and Berczy Creeks through the flood
plain and fill regulated area. A trench will be dug across the valleylands to within approximately 4 m
On either side of the streambanks. A pit will then be dug to auger the watermain under the
watercourses.
Contr.ol of Floorling:
Some of the work will be conducted in the flood plain; however, the grades will be returned to existing
levels and there will be nO impact On the control of flooding.
Polhltion'
Sediment fencing will to be installed between the watercourse and the work to prevent sediment from
entering the watercourse.
B394 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nrl'
Although all the work is within the road right-of-way for 16th Ave., the alignment for the watermain
extends through 220 m of flood plain at Berczy Creek. The valley is well defined; but the slopes are
not steep or high. At least 7 trees and other woody plants are to be removed to facilitate this work.
The Region of York forester is designing a landscape plan to restore the disturbed area.
The crossing at Bruce Creek does not significantly impact the features and functions of the valley
corridor.
The watermain alignment was reviewed under the Municipal Class EA for Water and Wastewater
process. The EA Report is complete and Authority objections satisfied; however, there has been a
request by Save the Rouge Valley System Inc. to have the servicing for this area subject to a full EA.
A full EA would include detailed design considerations for all the services. Staff expect the decision On
this request by the Minister's office in the near future. If the Minister agrees that a full EA is warranted
this staff recommendation will be withdrawn.
Eo.lic.v l, II i rl el i n e s.:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28068 Application #: 134/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.07.25
a..~ '1 )The Mllnicir~lity of Metrorolit~n Toronto
To alter a watercourse On Part Lot 13, Concession 1, (Morningside Park), in the City of
Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located on property owned by MTRCA.
Withdrawn by staff.
Q..3..22l.Corror~tioQ of the T D..WJU1.LEicke.ring
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 12, Concession 5, (Pickering Museum, Greenwood), in the
Town of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to place rip rap and armour stone to protect the bridge abutments to an existing
footbridge and to protect the adjacent stream bank.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998.
(1 ) Letter of Undertaking from Blair Chalmers of Rutherford Contracting referencing RedLine
Revision and Planting; Pickering Museum Erosion Protection; received August 9, 1996 (Total
Document 1)
(2) Erosion Protection of Pedestrian Bridge at Pickering Museum; prepared by Keewatin-Aski Ltd.;
Drawing 51; received August 9, 1996. (Total Drawings 1)
(3) Redline Revision, Erosion Protection at Pickering Museum; prepared by Keewatin-Aski Ltd.;
Drawing 52; received August 9, 1996. (Total Drawings 1)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B395
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Propo!;~I:
In order to protect the abutment of an existing foot bridge and the adjacent stream bank which are
currently being eroded, the Town of Pickering is proposing to place approximately 25 m of riprap and
armour stone along the stream bank.
Control of Flooding.:
The works will not impact the control of flooding.
Polllltion'
All equipment will work from the top of the stream bank. A sand bag coffer dam will be used to isolate
the work site from the watercourse.
Canserv~tion of I ~nrl'
Staff are still discussing the final detailed design of the stream bank protection with the COntractor and
the Ministry of Natural Resources. A geotechnical engineer is studying the site and will give design
recommendations. The design will minimise the impact On fish habitat.
The riparian area will be restored with seed and native woody vegetation compatible with the active
park use of the area.
E.ali~y l,lIirleline!;'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28104 Application #: 147/96/PICK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.08.02
(7 ~ 23)Io.wn...aL.eick
To alter a watercourse on 7th Concession Road, between Westney and Salem Road, in the
Town of Pickering, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to replace three CSP culverts and a box culvert that are failing on two tributaries of
Carruthers Creek with four CSP culverts.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998.
(1 ) Detailed Design Plans; prepared by Town of Pickering; Contract T-7-96; Sheets 1 of 10, 2 of
10,3 of 10,4 of 10, 5 of 10,6 of 10, 7 of 10,8 of 10, 9 of 10 and 10 of 10 revised August
13, 1996; received August 15, 1996. (Total Drawings 10)
B396 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
ProrO!;~I:
The Town of Pickering is resurfacing and upgrading the 7th Concession Road between Westney Road
and Salem Road. This work includes replacement of three CSP culverts and one box culvert on two
tributaries of the Carruthers Creek.
Contr.aL.a.f FI oorl i ng'
The capacity of the proposed culverts are to be equivalent to or larger than the existing culverts. The
grade of the road is to remain the same. There will be no impact on the control of flooding caused by
this work.
.E.aIlU1io.n.:.
The works will be undertaken under dry conditions to control sediment. In addition sediment fencing
will be installed adjacent to the watercourse.
Canserv~tion of I ::Inrl'
One culvert is to be relocated intercepting the watercourse before it enters the ditch system. This
realignment protects several trees and minimises the area where protection of the stream bank is
required.
The watercourses are intermittent at these sites. The Ministry of Natural Resources staff is reviewing
this proposal and a design change may be required based On their assessment of impacts On fish
habitat.
All of the work is to be done within the road right-of-way. The disturbed areas will be restored with
seed or sod as SOon as the work is complete.
Poli~y l,llirlelioes;
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28080 Application #: 137 /96/PICK
For information cOntact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.07.31
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B397
(7 ~ ?4)Town of Aj~)(
To alter a watercourse On Jacwin Drive at Miller Creek, in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to replace two existing corrugated steel pipe culverts that are failing with an open foot
box culvert.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998.
(1 ) Site Plan and General Arrangement Plan; prepared by Totten Sims Hubicki; Drawings 1 and 2;
dated July 31, 1996. (Total Drawings 2)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Eroro!;al:
The Town of Ajax is proposing to replace two existing corrugated steel pipe culverts that are failing
with an open foot box culvert under Jacwin Drive On a channelized and grassed lined portion of Miller
Creek.
Control of Floa.d.in.g:
The hydraulic capacity of the proposed structure is the same as existing. The control of flooding will
not be affected.
Polllltion'
All work will be done in the dry by damming and pumping around the work site. All disturbed areas
will be stabilized with riprap or sod immediately following the work. These actions will minimize
sediment in the watercourse.
Co.oserv~tion oLLand:
The disturbed riparian area beyond the road right-of-way will be planted with native wood vegetation.
The open foot box culvert results in the restoration of a natural stream bed.
Poli~y l,llirleline!;~
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as
it relates to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28027 Application #: 113/96/AJAX
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
B398 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16 , 1996
(7 ~ ?5) City of Ftobi~oke - Work~ Department
To alter a watercourse and construct in a flood plain On (The Westway, between Braecrest
Avenue and Saskatoon Drive), in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River Watershed as located On
property owned by same.
The purpose is to alter a waterway in conjunction with repairs to The Westway cOncrete culvert over
the Humber Creek.
The permit will be issued from August 16, 1996 to August 15, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Planmac Inc., Consulting Engineers and Planners; Job No. A-9330; Drawing
MB-10285; Sheets 1, 2, 3, and 4, Revision 1, dated July 12, 1996; received July 24, 1996.
(Total Drawings 4)
(2) Contract Documents for Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Culvert, Humber Creek at The
Westway; Tender No. 96-11; prepared by Planmac Inc., Consulting Engineers and Planners;
received July 24, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
&.op.osal:
The proposal consists of repairs to the existing concrete box culvert located at the intersection of The
Westway and the Humber Creek. The proposed repairs involve the removal and replacement of the
railings/guardrails, the straightening and anchoring of the wingwalls, and the repair of damaged
concrete and fill scour holes in the footings of the structure. The wingwalls of the structure are in
imminent danger of collapsing. Etobicoke Council has scheduled a meeting for August 16, 1996, in
order to grant final approval for the emergency repairs so that the work can commence as SOOn as
possible thereafter. No fill placement will occur as part of the proposed works; the construction will be
located within the presently unmapped Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber Creek.
Control of Floorling.:
The proposed repair work will not change the hydraulic capacity of the existing culvert.
Polllltion'
The construction ZOne will be isolated by coffer dams and streamflow will be pumped around the site;
the in-stream work area will be dewatered.
Conservation of I ~nrl'
Disturbed areas above and beside the culvert will be re-sodded following construction.
Poli~y l,lIirleline!;'
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28118 Application #: 156/96/ETOB
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.08.08.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/96, AUGUST 16, 1996 B399
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11 :20 a.m., August 16, 1996.
Ri~h~rrl O'Brien .1 Cr~ig M~ther
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/pl
~
"the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #8/96 Page B400
September 6, 1996
The Executive Committee met in the Humber Room, 5 Shoreham Drive on Friday, September 6, 1996.
The Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT
Michael Di Biase ........................................................ Member
Lois Griffin ............................................................ Member
Lois Hancey ................................................. Vice Chair, Authority
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Joan King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard O'Brien. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair, Authority
Richard Whitehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
REGRETS
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
RES #B114A/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #7/96, held August 16, 1996, be approved. ............. CARRIED
CORRESPONDENCE
(a) A letter, dated September 5, 1996, from the Mayor of the City of Vaughan, Lorna D. Jackson,
re: application for a proposed sales pavilion; 53 Woodbridge Avenue, Woodbridge, Ontario.
Applicant: 1191224 Ontario Limited (See page B443).
RES #B115/96 - CORRESPONDENCE
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the above item of correspondence be received. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
B401 EXECUtiVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
RES #B 116/.96- REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL
Receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of Peel to provide a
permanent easement for installing and maintaining sensors and for improving
pedestrian and cyclist safety, at the driveway at 1352 Lakeshore Road East, City
of Mississauga.CFN 23039
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from The Regional Municipality of Peel to provide a
permanent easement for installing and maintaining sensors and improving pedestrian and cyclist safety
at 1352 Lakeshore Road East, City of Mississauga;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate
with the Regional Municipality of Peel in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.011 hectares, more or less, (0.028 acres) be granted to the
Regional Municipality of Peel for installing and maintaining sensors and improving pedestrian and cyclist
safety, said land being Part of Lot 5, Concession 3, South of Dundas Street, City of Mississauga,
Regional Municipality of Peel;
THAT consideration is to be $2.00 plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THAT said easement is subject to obtaining approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as
amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the
execution of any documents. .............................................. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Regional Municipality of Peel was in the process of undertaking intersection improvements at
Lakeshore Road East and Dixie Road. Opposite Dixie Road is a driveway for access to Authority-owned
land at 1352 Lakeshore Road East. This property is part of the former Canada Post property presently
leased to Ontario Hydro.
During construction the Region was asked to make certain safety improvements to the intersection.
The purpose of the easement is to install and maintain sensors beneath the driveway in and out of our
property and to make some alterations to the pathway crossing to improve pedestrian and cyclist
safety.
Because the Region was in the middle of construction, they requested permission to enter for
construction of the work which was granted On the understanding that if the easement was not
granted by the Authority, or the Province, all equipment would be removed and the lands restored.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B402
The subject Authority holding is part of a much larger area, acquired from Canada Post On October 30,
1992, under the Waterfront-Etobicoke Sector component of the Land Acquisition Project.
The Regional Municipality of Peel has conveyed lands to the Authority over the years for the nominal
consideration of $2.00 and we request that this easement be granted for the nominal consideration of
$2.00. The Region will be responsible for all survey, legal and other costs associated with completion
of this transaction.
The Authority technical staff have reviewed the technical details of the proposed construction and are
satisfied.
A plan illustrating this location is attached.
Report prepared by:
Lori Colussi, extension 303
B403 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
I ~I I , - . .
f
, I ... ~
!II
~ cw
....
lit t et
I I ~1
)l.QJ
(t"
- l./)~
,
-- -~I
::;->~ ,lU/ "'\,
. 0 0 I
I I -~
ttOI:! 31XIQ '\ ! ~~
~":, '" I
-
. c:::lU -
. l&,jU ""
.~= i~ ~
. Q:I
.. Q
a..", III
!
:
I/l
~
l C;
...I
~ \ I C"'b
\ \t'I
en ...,
<x: \ ~
w I
C) I I
<x: ~
0 I I ~~
0:: c...".Q
. I I
w I I
0:: I I
0 I
:r: I
en I I
w I I 4
~ !
<x: I -
--I I !
~""~'= ~ss~ !~ gt,. ~~J:": ~:':~ O;':7-er-~.-
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B404
RES #8117/96 - THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO V ALLEY
AND SHORELINE REGENERATION PROJECT 1992-1996
The Tender Opening Sub-Committee opened tenders On August 16, 1996 for the
supply and delivery of quarry stone for the Sylvan Erosion Control Project, City of
Scarborough and recommended that all tenders be referred to staff for review
and report.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Tender ES96-19 for the supply and delivery of Rip
Rap stone be awarded to Nelson Aggregates at a total cost of $23,775.00 (excluding G.S.T.), and also
that tender ES96-20 for the supply and delivery of Armour stone be awarded to J.C. Rock Ltd. at a
total cost of $104,000.00 (excluding G.S.T.). .................................. CARRIED
RATIONALE
The quotations received were based on a total estimated requirement of 4,000 tonnes of Armour stone
and 1,500 tOnnes of Rip Rap stone for the Sylvan Erosion Control project in the City of Scarborough.
Staff have reviewed the tenders and recommend that the lowest quotation received for the supply of
Armour stOne at the unit cost of $26.00 per metric tOn from J. C. Rock Ltd. be accepted.
Staff are also recommending that the lowest quotation received for the supply of Rip Rap stone at the
unit cost of $15.85 per metric ton from Nelson Aggregates also be accepted.
The unit prices include provincial sales tax on stone supply only, but do not include G.S. T.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are budgeted under the "Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration
Project 1992-1996" and are available in Account No. 133-03.
Report prepared by:
Joe Delle Fave (416-392-9724)
8405 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
,}
,I .. I ~ ~ I I I I I I- i
I ~ ~I &'I:' I
II~ il ; &" ::! a! I a! i I I a:
! ; ;,\3' Z I Z I I'
-I) i:i :II: !l 'I : '1' ~,' ~; ! I;! fa
at'" - - _I' ..;,1-
- e!3 II I - -, -! ::; ~
Hi I ~ ii, ~
I I CD Ct I I z'i en
11I~ C1. ~. ., en
I ~; ~Il ; I: I ~ I' 'II a I ~
"12: a ~ -- ".. , w
ilB i III I ~
i. .~ : z! : I I a
I I' g. ,I :' 0
Ii; II ell : i 'I 'I II ~
rlii~* ., -I ;:1 w
12 8 !II !I I " " , ... c
c ~ , m III I I z
-. I =, . . " I ,
: c z' Z : W
I I I CD .' I I' I-
;a~ "II l:!' I.' ;i
! i : ;, ~! .! = I ~', I ~ ~
IS~~I' ~I - - ; :: (!J
: 8 ; I Cf
I I I I 0
..! g, . ~
i~~; 1f! I. ~
r:le~!.. :.! c
S:.!3 Cl I "'-
2Q,i . G!, .~
..... ' jC ZI 1(.)
I CD Ct.1 .' W
.. CD '" CI ' .' Z
...- ~ ~ " I " " I I a! '"
Ii:" = ~ I .... &'I, C'I, ." ...,
! II i = ~I . '1;' : ;. '. a4" ~ : Iii ~ ~
e 1 Z 81-
lID I I ~ CI ' CI : I . ,% en
> '.. . CI' ",:' ; ~..w
II:: U I " \:Z: C,)
a: I~~. I =~: ,li:-
~ I a ~ "I ~!! .. ; i - i " , " ! : '! i:! 5:
c:s - 8 -. I :' m, CD I - ,f :
~ .: !I I ! i Z Z : ~ ~
> I I I CD ~ 1ft 'I I" I'~ <
ffi I, ~ e ~I ~ ~ I J ~ ~ I ~ ; I ~
> .. t. - - C'I, ..r'~_
:2 t ; 13*: ., I ... -,"; ..! _j! ::I
, III - 8 : iI. i' CD ' _ W
Q 1 I I:", ita:
Q I : Z i;!Q.
~ .: i I Sol
'> I ;:
t ~ I. ~:~
= II !II e, s , :..1 I~
lID t:l!;!;, i! ~ !:i ,-I I: ~
~ I i~ i i i ! ! a : i! i I ~ I I 3 ~
I loJ ,. G I . , & ' . ~ c .. _
If) , ' loJ, ~, .. 8 ;0 : Q I !c' ... ,> ;
II:: ....1.' ~ ZO' "I~
I I .. W c: i' c C' .. P.'i a
I LlJUU. Ii" i: = i ' ~. ~ ~ : I' e I~ !
III . ~., .. a, .' t lC .. w
... . .. ; :! ' ~! · ' ~ = , . !:i.~ i
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B406
RES #8118/96- REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP
WATERFRONT PARK (MARCH 1993)
Supply of Quarry Stone to the Etobicoke Motel Strip Project, City of Etobicoke
The Tender Opening Sub-Committee opened tenders On August 16, 1996 for the
supply and delivery of quarry stone, and recommended that all tenders be
referred to staff for review and report.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Tender ES96-21 for the supply and delivery of Rip
Rap stone be awarded to Nelson Aggregates at a total cost of $47,250.00 (excluding G.S.T.), and also
that tender ES96-22 for the supply and delivery of Armour stone be awarded to J.C. Rock Ltd. at a
total cost of $130,000.00 (excluding G.S.T.). .................................. CARRIED
RA TIONALE
The quotations received were based on a total estimated requirement of 5,000 tonnes of Armour stone
and 3,500 tonnes of Rip Rap stone for the Etobicoke Motel Strip project in the City of Etobicoke.
Staff have reviewed the tenders and recommend that the lowest quotation received for the supply of
Armour stone at the unit cost of $26.00 per metric ton from J. C. Rock Ltd. be accepted.
Staff are also recommending that the lowest quotation received for the supply of Rip Rap stone at the
unit cost of $13.50 per metric ton from Nelson Aggregates also be accepted.
The unit prices include provincial sales tax On stone supply only, but do not include G.S.T.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are budgeted under the "Etobicoke Motel Strip Project", and available in Account No. 208-63.
Report prepared by:
Joe Delle Fave (416-392-9724)
B407 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
RES #8119196 - APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVES TO THE ROUGE PARK
ALLIANCE
The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's appointments to
the Rouge Park Alliance.
Moved by: Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Joan King
THE EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT Councillor Raymond Cho be reappointed
as The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's representative on the Rouge Park
Alliance and that Mr. Brian Denney, Director of Watershed Management, be appointed as the
Authority's alternate representative;
AND FURTHER THAT the Chair of the Rouge Park Alliance be so advised. .............. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In May of 1995, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, by Resolution
#A127/95, appointed Councillor Raymond Cho and Mr. Ken Owen as the Authority's representative
and alternate, respectively, to the Rouge Park Alliance. Councillor Cho's appointment was for 18
months beginning in February, 1995, to coincide with the term of his appointment by The Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto, to the Authority.
Councillor Cho has nOw been reappointed by Metropolitan Toronto for an additional
18-month period and, therefore, his appointment for an additional 18-month period to the Rouge Park
Alliance should be confirmed.
Mr. Ken Owen has also left the Authority and therefore there is a need to appoint an alternate to
Councillor Cho.
In this regard, it is recommended that Mr. Brian Denney be appointed as the Authority's alternate
representative to the Rouge Park Alliance.
Report prepared by: Craig Mather, extension 240
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B408
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES #B120/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Quarry Landscaping - Brick and Limestone Paving Work (Tender ES96-26)
This report advises on the results of the brick and limestone paving quotations
received by the Authority as part of the Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report
for Meeting #8/96, September 6, 1996.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT Tender Opening Sub-committee Report #34/96 dated August 30, 1996, on brick and limestone
paving quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the supply and installation of clay
brick and limestone pavers associated with the Don Valley Brick Works site restoration project to Alex
Landscaping limited for the amount of $36,315.00 (excluding GST). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This contract is for the construction of clay brick and limestone pathways and patios within the Quarry
area of the Don Valley Brick Works site.
Contractors experienced in this type of work were pre-qualified by the project consultants, construction
manager, and staff. Based On this prequalification, the following cOntractors were asked to submit
bids. The results of the tender process are:
Contr~~tor Rirl~
Alex Landscaping Ltd. $36,315
Aldershot Landscape Contractors $65,365
Bruce S. Evans Ltd. Declined
Gateman Milloy Declined
Mopal Construction Ltd. $53,800
Simonis Landscaping Declined
Somerville Construction $62,759
Contractors who declined to bid did so due to scheduling difficulties.
B409 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in ACCount 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and the Conservation Foundation
of Greater Toronto.
For information contact:
Nick Saccone (ext. 301) or Adele Freeman (ext. 238)
RES #B121/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Quarry Landscaping - Concrete Forming Work (Tender ES96-25)
This report advises On the results of the concrete forming quotations received by
the Authority as part of the Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report for Meeting
#8/96, September 6, 1996.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT Tender Opening Sub-committee Report #35/96 dated August 30, 1996, on concrete forming
work be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the concrete forming work associated
with the Quarry Phase of the Don Valley Brick Works site restoration project to Somerville Construction
for the amount of $58,525 (excluding GSTI. ................................... CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This cOntract is for Construction of concrete elements of the Quarry Garden landscaping, such as
pathway edging, steps, retaining walls, and benches.
Contractors experienced in this type of work were pre-qualified by the project consultants, construction
manager, and staff. Based on this prequalification, the following contractors were asked to submit
bids: The results of the tender process are:
Contr~~tor Rirl!;
Aldershot Landscape Contractors $103,899
Bruce S. Evans Ltd. Declined
Gateman Milloy Declined
Mopal Construction Ltd. $67,100
Simonis Landscaping Declined
Somerville Construction $58,525
Contractors who declined to bid did so due to scheduling difficulties.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96. SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B410
RATIONALE
A general review and analysis was conducted with the low bidder and it was determined that their
scope of work was complete. In addition, reference checks proved to be positive.
Based On this review. staff recommend that the lowest quotation received for the supply and
installation of clay brick and limestone pavers be accepted.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in Account# 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick Works
Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and the Conservation Foundation
of Greater Toronto.
For information contact:
Nick Saccone (ext. 301) or Adele Freeman (ext. 238)
RES #B122/96 - "LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT
1995-1999" IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN
TORONTO
East Point Park. Lake Ontario Waterfront. City of Scarborough
Award of contract for the final slope stabilization and trail construction at East
Point Park, City of Scarborough.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT staff be directed to award the contract for slope stabilization and trail construction at East Point
Park, City of Scarborough, be awarded to Anpro Excavating and Grading Limited for the amount of
$68,116.20 (including GST). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
RA TIONALE
Six contractors were invited to submit quotations for the construction of the pathway and slope
stabilization work. Due to time constraints, staff opened the quotations On September 3, 1996. This
schedule provided sufficient time for contractors to submit bids while meeting our approval schedule
and proposed starting and completion dates for the work. The results are as follows:
Contr~~tor Tot~1 Pri~e (indllrling l,ST)
Drainstar Contracting Ltd. $ 74,474.14
London Excavating $ 77,269.52
Anpro Excavating and Grading $ 84,968.70
Active Excavating $ 89,773.00
Sartor & Susin Limited $ 99,893.06
Gottardo Bros. Excavating $144,518.20
B411 EXECU"lIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
All the quotations were reviewed in detail and were correct and complete except for the quotation from
Anpro Excavating and Grading. An arithmetical error in multiplying the unit price by the quantity
resulted in their quotation being adjusted to a correct total of $68,116.20 (including GST).
Anpro Excavating and Grading Limited has agreed to accept the contract at the revised total amount.
Staff recommend that this contract be awarded to Anpro Excavating and Grading Limited for a total
amount of $68,116.20 (including GST).
BACKGROUND
At their meeting #6/96; held On July 26th, the Authority approved the awarding of the contract for the
construction of a new storm sewer pipe and outfall structure at East Point Park under "The Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project 1992-1996". Once this new storm
system is operational around early September, it will facilitate the final phase of the project involving
slope remediation and trail access to the shoreline.
Tenders have been invited for the construction of a three metre wide pathway along Beechgrove Drive
to the Lake Ontario shoreline at East Point Park. As part of the general excavation and grading work,
the existing eroded gully will be backfilled, graded and the slope stabilized.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This project is being carried out under the "Lake Ontario Waterfront Regeneration Project 1995-1999"
in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
Funds for the work will be available in Account No. 222-11. Metro Toronto Parks has agreed to
contribute $40,000 towards the cost of the pathway construction.
Report prepared by:
Nigel Cowey (Ext.244)
RES.JlBi23L96 - PROJECT FOR FLOOD PROTECTION DIXIE/DUNDAS FLOOD
CENTRE - LITTLE ETOBICOKE CREEK, THE REGIONAL
MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL
The Tender Opening Sub-Committee opened tenders On August 16, 1996, for the
supply and delivery of quarry stone to Dixie/Dundas Flood Control Project,
Mississauga, and recommended that all tenders be referred to staff for review
and report. Supply of Quarry Stone
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT Tender ES96-27 for the supply and delivery of Armour stone be awarded to J.C. Rock Ltd. at a
total cost of $78,000.00 (excluding G.S.T.1. ................................... CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B412
RA TIONALE
The quotations received were based On a total estimated requirement of 3,000 tonnes of Armour stone
for the Dixie/Dundas Flood Control project in the City of Mississauga.
Staff have reviewed the tenders and recommend that the lowest quotation received for the supply of
Armour stone at the unit cost of $26.00 per metric tOn from J. C. Rock Ltd. be accepted.
The unit prices include provincial sales tax on stOne supply only, but do not include G.S.T.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are budgeted under the "Project for Flood Protection Dixie/Dundas Flood Centre - Little Etobicoke
Creek, the Regional Municipality of Peel", and are available in Account No. 113-25.
Report prepared by:
Joe Delle Fave (416-392-9724)
RES #8124/96- lAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1995-
1999 IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO
The Tender Opening Sub-Committee opened tenders on August 16, 1996 for the
supply and delivery of quarry stone to Colonel Samuel Smith Park, Etobicoke, and
recommended that all tenders be referred to staff for review and report.
Moved by: Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THA T Tender ES96-23 for the supply and delivery of Rip Rap stone be awarded to Nelson Aggregates
at a total cost of $32,400.00 (excluding G.S.T.);
AND FURTHER THAT Tender ES96-24 for the supply and delivery of Armour stone be awarded to J.C.
Rock Ltd. at a total cost of $33,800.00 (excluding G.S.T.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
RA TIONALE
The quotations received were based On a total estimated requirement of 1,300 tonnes of Armour stone
and 2,400 tonnes of Rip Rap stone for Colonel Samuel Smith Park in the City of Etobicoke.
Staff have reviewed the tenders and recommend that the lowest quotation received for the supply of
Armour stone at the unit cost of $26.00 per metric tOn from J. C. Rock Ltd. be accepted.
Staff are also recommending that the lowest quotation received for the supply of Rip Rap stone at the
unit cost of $13.50 per metric ton from Nelson Aggregates also be accepted.
The unit prices include provincial sales tax On stOne supply only, but do not include G.S.T.
B413 EXECU11VE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are budgeted in the "Lake Ontario Waterfront Regeneration Project 1995-1999 in the
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto".
Funds are available in Account No. 204-03.
Report prepared by:
Joe Delle Fave (416-392-9724)
B.ESJlBj25/96 - 1996 WATERFRONT MONITORING PROGRAM
Lab Analytical Services
The selection of Laboratory Analytical Services are required for the 1996
Waterfront Monitoring Program Tender RS 96-LAB. This report advises On the
results of the quotations received the Tender Opening Sub-committee.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT the Tender Opening Sub-committee Report #36/96, dated August 30, 1996, for the laboratory
analytical service quotations (RS 96-LAB) be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the 1996 laboratory analytical service to
Philip Analytical Services Corporation, it being the lowest quote received in the amount of $35,257.57
(including GST). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Since 1975, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (MTRCA) has conducted
environmental monitoring programs to describe biological, physical and chemical conditions in the vicinity of
waterfront parks. Special studies have been conducted to examine the sediment quality, water quality,
sediment deposition rates, bottom substrate documentation. biomonitoring surveys using freshwater clams,
and currents associated with waterfront parks. The 1 996 Program includes analyses forming part of the
environmental studies in Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park, Tommy Thompson Park and the Etobicoke
Motel Strip.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Tender Opening Sub-committee opened tenders for the laboratory analytical service contract required for
the 1996 Waterfront Monitoring Program. The tenders were sent to the following firms and once received,
were referred to staff for review and a report. Funds are available under various waterfront accounts,
including 240-01, 601-70, 208-30.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B414
.
The results of the tender process are:
Contr~~tor Bids
MDS Environmental Services $52,339.05
Walker Laboratories $52,136.82
Ortech Laboratories $45,132.60
AGRA Earth Laboratories $40,198.83
Philip Analytical Services Corporation $35,257.57
Environmental Protection Laboratories Merged with MDS
Zenon Merged with Philip
Barringer Laboratories Merged with Philip
Technical Services Laboratories Quote not returned
Entech Laboratories Quote not returned
HBT Laboratories Quote not returned
Enviroclean Ltd. Quote not returned
Technitrol Expertise Inc. Quote package returned
RA TIONALE
A general review of the lowest bid was completed, and it was determined that the lab met all criteria the
MTRCA laid out in the SPECIFICATION FOR ANALYTICAL SERVICES document. In addition, the lowest
bidder met all general conditions required by MTRCA to submit a quote.
Based On this information, staff recommend the contract for Laboratory Analytical Services be awarded to
Philip Analytical Services Corporation, in the amount of $35,257.57.
For information contact:
Rick Portiss, Ext. 302
B415 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
RES #B126/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required
to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or On a
pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules
whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some
other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream,
or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of
land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THA T permits (7.5.1-7.5.27, with the exception of 7.5.6 and 7.5.12) be granted in accordance with Ontario
Regulation 158 for the applications which are listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
RES IlB127/96 - PERMIT 7.5.6 - THE CITY OF NORTH YORK
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THA T a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application, 7.5.6, The City of
North York, which is listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
RES #B12819.6 - PERMIT 7.5.12 - PICKERING HARBOUR COMPANY
Moved by: Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THA T a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application, 7.5.12, Pickering
Harbour Company, which is listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B416
(7 5 1 )Town of C~lerlon
To place fill within a regulated area On Part Lot 9, Concession 6 Albion, (east side of Sackville
Street, south of Hickman Street - Bolton), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as
located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material within an open building foundation located within the Fill Regulated Area
of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan; prepared by Glenn Blakely, By-law Enforcement Officer, Town of Caledon; received July
30, 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
&.oposal :
The proposal consists of filling in a remnant foundation of a building destroyed by fire. The building is
located On an unopened road allowance known as Slancy Street, which is owned by the Town of Caledon.
The fill material to be placed will match the adjacent ground elevation. The area to be filled is situated
within the Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River.
Control of Floorling.:.
The site to be filled is located above the Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River.
Eollutian:
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works.
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nrl' ,
The site is located On tableland and there will be no fill placed below the top-of-bank of the Humber River
valley. The filled area will be topsoiled and grass-seeded or sodded following final grading.
Eolic.v-G II irl el i n e s .
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28133 Application #: 157 /96/CAL
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.08.9.
B417 EXECU"tIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
(7 !i 7) l ~wren~e W~tt!;
To place fill within a regulated area On Lot 40, Registered Plan M-2032, (36 Curtis Crescent - King
City), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill in order to replace the existing failing sewage disposal system located within the
Fill Regulated Area of the East Humber River.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan and Cross-section Drawing of Proposed Leaching Bed; prepared by Rural Development
Consultants Ltd.; Project 95-1317 dated September 7, 1995; received August 9, 1996.
(2) Silt Fence Installation detail submitted by the applicant on August 15, 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
ProrO!;~1 :
The proposal consists of removing the existing sewage leaching bed and replacing it with a new tile field.
The existing septic system was improperly installed and undersized for the dwelling that was built on this lot
of Kingscross Estates subdivision (File 19T-79640). The new owner wishes to remedy this problem, since
the septic tank must be pumped out everyone to two weeks. The southern half of the new tile field is
located within the Fill Regulated Area of the East Humber River.
Control of Floorling'
The site is located above the Regional Storm flood plain of the East Humber River.
fullutian:
Silt fencing will be installed along the rear yard boundary to impede the overland migration of sediment
during construction. The new tile bed is located approximately 80 metres from the watercourse.
ConservMion of I ~nrl'
No fill placement will occur below the top-of-bank of the East Humber River valley. The leaching bed area
will be sodded following final grading.
Poli~y Gllirleline!;'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28142 Application #: 167 /96/KING
For information cOntact: George Leja (ext. 3421
Date: 1996.08.23.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B418
(7 5 ~) M~rjorie M~t!;on ~nrl Elon S~rtIhh
To place fill within a regulated area On 55-57 Lakeland Drive, in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River
Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material in conjunction with the removal of an existing, failing concrete deck and
reinforcement of the remaining concrete retaining wall, within the Fill Regulated Area of the West Humber
River.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan; prepared by Ireland Engineering Associates Ltd.; Project 9636; Drawing 5-1 dated May 27,
1996; received June 21, 1996. (Total Plans 1).
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
&aposal:
The proposal involves the removal of an existing cOncrete deck and reinforcement of a retaining wall
beneath the deck. The entire structure is presently slanted southward and is at imminent risk of falling into
the West Humber River valley which is owned by the City of Etobicoke. The rehabilitation of the retaining
wall structure is under an Order to Comply from the City of Etobicoke Building Department. Once the deck
has been removed and the retaining wall strengthened, granular fill material will be placed behind the wall
and overtopped with topsoil. The backyard area is fill regulated.
Control of Floorling'
The site is located above the Regional Storm flood plain of the West Humber River.
Polllltion'
No sedimentation is expected to be generated from the proposed works. Also the site is 70 metres away
from the watercourse channel.
ConsenLalion of l ~od:
Authority staff has reviewed the geotechnical analysis prepared for this project and is satisfied with the
method of rehabilitation/construction. The proposed works will result in de-loading the weight distributed
On the adjacent valleywall. The disturbed backyard behind the concrete retaining wall will be sodded
following final grading.
M~y Gllirlelines.:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28057 Application #: 128/96/ETOB
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.08.23.
B419 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
(7 1) 4) .Jerry ~nrl .J~rmil~ PII~hyr
To place fill within a regulated area On Lot 59 and Part Lots 58 and 60, Registered Plan 240, (38
Willowbank Avenue, Lake Wilcox), in theTown of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as
located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area for lot grading.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan, 38 Willowbank Ave., Lake Wilcox showing placement of fill; prepared by applicant;
received July 29, 1996..
RA TIONALE ,
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Eroposal:
The applicant is seeking approval to place fill in a fill regulated area outside of the flood plain. The
maximum depth of fill is 0.5 m over two areas totalling 125 m2. The lot grading meets the grading for the
property to the north and west and to the road and is required to fill in depressed areas at the rear and front
yards of the property. There is a swale On the south lot line to direct overland flow to the roadside ditch.
Co ntro I of FJo.a.ding.:
The site is not in the flood plain. The control of flooding will not be affected.
Polllltion'
The works will not be a source of pollution.
CanseOlation of I ~nrl'
The lot is part of an established and redeveloping residential area On Lake Wilcox. It is not part of the
Environmental Protection Area designated for Lake Wilcox under OPA 129. No significant resource features
will be affected by this work.
Poli~y Gllirleline!;'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as it
relates to Section 4.2.2 (E) Existing Developments - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures.
CFN: 28131 Application #: 159/96/RH
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.08.13.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B420
(7 5 !'i) Metrorolit~n Toronto - Tr~n~rort~tion Dp.r~rtmp.nt
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 20 and 21, Concession 2 EHS, (Finch Avenue at the East Don),
in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to remove existing concrete slabs, undertake instream toe protection works and place
terrafix protection works under the Finch Avenue bridge over the East Don River..
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit.
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Chisholm Fleming and Associates; Drawings 5-607-24, dated July 1996; 5-607-
25, dated June 1996; 5-607-26 dated August 1996. (Total Drawings 3).
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
ProrO!;~1 :
To remove existing deteriorated concrete slabs, construct armourstone toe protection works and terra fix
slope protection in order to improve the Finch Avenue bridge at the East Don River.
Control of Floorling'
The cross-sectional area of the banks will not be altered; therefore, no hydraulic impacts will occur.
Polllltion'
A partial diversion method using coffer dams will be employed to provide a dry work area and ensure that
sedimentation will not occur.
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nd:
The works include plantings of native woody material to restore the embankment outside the bridge
"shadow". Additional instream cover will be provided through the placement of boulders in the low flow
channel.
e.ali~y GlJirleline!;'
The works comply with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section 4.3 -
Infrastructure and Servicing. They also comply with the recommendations of the Don Watershed Task
Force (Forty Steps to a New Don).
CFN: 28061 Application #: 130/96/NY
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.08.14.
B421 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
a...s fi) The City of North York
To place fill in a regulated area and alter a watercourse on Part Lot 14, Concession 3 EYS, (355
Lesmill road), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to undertake bioengineered toe protection works and associated slope regrading in a
regulated area of a tributary of the Don River.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Harrington and Hoyle Ltd.; Project 95-12; Drawing L 1 dated revised August 6,
1996; Drawings L2 and L3 dated revised August 7, 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
.Erap.osa1:
To Construct toe protection works and undertake associated slope regrading in order to provide bio-
engineered erosion protection to an existing eroded slope in Montfield Farm Park. The slope is south of the
existing Federation of Ontario Naturalists building. Specifically, the works include a live cribwall, rock
vortex weirs and live stakes and brush On the slope.
Control of Floorling:
The works do not involve significant changes to the existing grades within the flood plain. the control of
flooding will not be affected.
EaIlution:
Construction of the toe protection works will be undertaken using manual labour. Machinery access to the
watercourse will not be required. A siltation fence will be place around the work areas as a precaution to
prevent siltation in the watercourse.
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nrl'
The bioengineering works have been designed in conjunction with a geotechnical report On the slope. The
rock vortex weirs and cribwall will arrest toe erosion and a combination of live stakes and free-draining
granular material will be utilized to stabilize the existing eroded slope. Staff have reviewed the design and
geotechnical report and are satisfied with the approach.
Poli~y Guirleline!;'
The works are in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section
4.3.2 - Remedial Erosion protection works for existing infrastructure.
CFN: 27736 Application #: 12/96/NY
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.08.14.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 8422
(7 !'i 7) York Hyrlro
To place fill within a regulated area On Part Lot 39, York Twp., (Weston Road and Black Creek
Drive), in the City of York, Humber River Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake regrading works in a flood plain and regulated area of the Black Creek in order
to construct a primary hydro duct bank.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; prepared by York Hydro; Drawing C-1793 dated August 21, 1996; and Drawing
C-1793A dated April 23, 1996.
(2) MTRCA Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines; Figure 6.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Proro~al:
To excavate for trenching and cable pulling chambers in a flood plain and regulated area of the Black Creek
in order to install an underground hydro primary duct bank.
Control of Floorling;
Proposed final grades will match existing grades; the control of flooding will therefore not be affected.
Polllltion'
A siltation fence will be erected along the line of an existing chain-link fence between the work area and the
watercourse in order to prevent sedimentation.
Consentation of I ~nrl'
The existing riparian vegetation adjacent to the Black Creek south of Hyde Avenue will not be disturbed.
E.ali~y l,lIirlelines:
The proposal is in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section
4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28152 Application #: 176/96/YORK
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (Ext. 281)
Date: 1996.08.23.
B423 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
(7 5 8) C~tholi~ Cemeterie!; - Ar~hrlio~e~e of Toronto
To alter a watercourse On Part Lots 34 and 35, Concession 1 EYS, (8361 Yonge Street), in the
Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to regrade and fill a remnant watercourse channel.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Holy Cross Cemetery Grading Plan; prepared by Higgins Engineering Ltd.; Drawing 1313-300A1;
received July 24, 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Propo!;~I:
The applicant is proposing to regrade their lands to prepare it for use as a cemetery. A small remnant and
intermittent watercourse crosses the property and it is proposed to be filled. Currently the watercourse has
a defined channel; however the upstream drainage area has been cut off and rerouted with the development
of the 407 corridor. Only local drainage from the cemetery nOw enters the watercourse. In addition, the
watercourse has been incorporated into a storm sewer system within the downstream development.
Control of Flooding.:
The lands are not in the flood plain. The control of flooding will not be affected by these works.
Pollution'
A fence will be installed around the property to control sediment.
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nrl'
The cemetery lands will be regraded, directing overland flow to a water quality treatment pond.
E.ali~y l,lIirleline!;'
Section 3.3. of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program supports such activities as
filling, enclosure and channelization of remnant watercourses if urban drainage design requirements
demonstrate the need. Given that the water has been directed into the municipal sewer system as a result
of development upstream and the watercourse nO longer exists downstream, this enclosure is in compliance
with Section 3.3 of he Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28114 Application #: 155/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.08.12
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B424
17 .5.9\ The Soorts Club of Canada
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 1, Concession 3, (Leslie Street north of Steeles
Avenue), in the Town of Markham, DOn River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to erect a seasonal tennis bubble over four courts which are partially within the Regional
Storm flood plain.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan; prepared by OKUN Architects; Code #SCC-V 9424; Drawing SP1; dated February 19,
1996; as received on August 22, 1996.
(2) Air Supported Tennis Structure Detail; provided by OKUN Architects; as received on August 22,
1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
The applicant proposes to erect a seasonal tennis bubble over four tennis courts which are located
partially within the Regional Storm flood plain. The tennis courts are part of an existing 16 cart complex
at the rear of the Sports Club of Canada building. The Sports Club and tennis courts are located On the
wide valley floor of the Don River.
COntrol of Floodina:
The new bubble will not create an additional obstruction to flood flows as the existing courts are
currently fenced. Furthermore, the tennis courts are located along the fringe of the regulatory flood
plain and behind the existing clubhouse building.
Pollution:
There is no grading required for the proposed tennis bubble. As a result there will be no impact On the
control of pollution.
Conservation of Land:
There will be nO additional impact on the conservation of land.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program -
Section 4.2.2 - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures.
CFN: 28156 Application #: 181/96/MARK
For information contact: Russel White, ext. 306
Date: 1996.08.23.
B425 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
(7.5.101 Kari and Beatrice Valli
To place fill within a regulated area On Lot 9, Registered Plan 113, (32 Rouge Street), in the
Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property oWned by same.
The purpose is to regrade in order to construct a small addition and install weeping tiles to service an
existing residence.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan - 32 Rouge Street; prepared by Kari and Beatrice Valli; Drawing dated August 9,
1996; received on August 12, 1996.
(2) Site Survey - 32 Rouge Street; prepared by R.B. McKibbur Limited; received August 12, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
The applicant proposes to regrade in order to construct a small addition and install weeping tiles to
service an existing residence. The works are within the Fill Regulated Area. The addition is proposed
for the front of the property and away from the adjacent Rouge Valley side slope. The weepers will be
discharged to a soakaway pit towards the rear of the property, a distance of more than 300 metres
from the Rouge River.
Control of Floodina:
There will be nO impacts On the control of flooding as works are not within the flood plain.
Pollution:
There will be no negative pollution impacts.
Conservation of Land:
The works are being conducted in a manicured section of the property and will not involve the removal
of vegetation. All disturbed areas will be resodded.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2 Minor Improvements of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28146 Application #: 169/96/MARK
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.08.21.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B426
(7 5 11 )City of S~~rborollgb
To COnstruct in a flood plain On Part Lot 33, Concession 1, (between Ellesmere Road and Dewey
Drive), in the City of Scarborough, Don River Watershed as located On property owned by Ontario
Hydro.
The purpose is to construct an off line sanitary detention tank which will be connected to an existing
sanitary trunk sewer located partially within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Don River.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Proposed Offline Sanitary Storage Tank, Massey Creek prepared by the City of Scarborough Works
and Environment Dept.; Project 8479; Drawing 557; as received August 9, 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Proro~~I:
The applicant proposes to COnstruct an off line sanitary detention tank which will be connected to an
existing sanitary trunk sewer adjacent to the Massey Creek. The watercourse is contained within an
engineered channel and will not be impacted by the works. The sanitary detention tank is required to
alleviate basement flooding caused during peak runoff periods.
Control of Floorling'
There will be nO impact On the control of flooding as the site will be returned to original grades.
Polllltion'
The tank will create extra detention for sanitary flows and will have an overall environmental benefit.
Sediment fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the works and will remain in place until completion.
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nrl'
The works are within an existing Ontario Hydro Corridor and will not impact On the banks of the channelized
Massey Creek.
Ealic.v-G II i rl eli n e!;'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28147 Application #: 170/96/SCAR
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.08.21.
B427 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
(7 5 1 ')Pi~kering H~rhour Comr~ny
To place fill within a regulated area on Waterlot Part 3, Plan 40R-2022t, Lot 24 Conc. BFC, in the
Town of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to stockpile rubble within the Fill Regulated Area for future work On waterfront piers.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan showing proposed location of rubble storage; prepared by applicant; received August 14,
1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Eroro!;~I:
The Pickering Harbour Co. is proposing to temporarily stockpile rubble secured from the demolition of a
nearby road bridge. The material will be used for future work On the channel piers which lead into
Frenchman's Bay. The rubble is to be stockpiled on lands owned by the Harbour Co. adjacent to and on the
east side of the mouth of the bay.
Control of Floorling'
The rubble will be located within an area of lakeshore flooding; however, the material will not effect the
control of flooding and will be of a sufficient size to withstand the effects of high lake levels. The location
is temporary and all material will be removed Once work on the channel piers commences.
POlllltio~
There will be no sediment generated from the site.
CanseQl~tion of I ~nrl'
Staff are generally supportive of future maintenance of the piers at the mouth of Frenchman's Bay. The
repair of these piers will be the subject of another permit application in the future. At that time staff will
consider appropriate design details.
fuLicy-.Gui.delines.:
The future pier design and construction will be consistent with the Integrated Shoreline Management
Program, Provincial Policy, and principles of public safety and coastal process.
CFN: 28108 Application #: 151 /96/PICK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, ext. 306
Date: 1996.08.21.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B428
(7 5 1 ~)Thp. Town of C~lerlon
To alter a watercourse On Part Lot 34, Concession 12, (Albion/Vaughan Road), in the City of
Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a stormwater detention facility on an intermittent tributary of the Robinson
Creek (Bolton-South Hill Pond #4, Humber River) in order to facilitate the development of the Bolton-South
Hill development area.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 2001
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Aquafor-Beech Ltd.; Job 6567; Drawings 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, and 10 dated July,
1996. (Total Plans 8)
(2) Plans; prepared by Aquafor-Beech Ltd. and Todhunter Schollen; Job 6567; Drawings 8 dated revised
Apri I 16, 1996; Drawing 9 dated May, 1995. (Total Plans 2)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
&oposa1:
To construct a water quality and quantity facility to provide stormwater management for the southern 98
hectares of drainage within the Bolton South Hill development area. This facility is known as Bolton South
Hill Pond #4 and is located immediately east of Albion/Vaughan line and north of the CPR line. The site is
not fill regulated.
Cantrol...o.f Flo orl i ng'
The pond was originally identified as a quantity facility in the original Bolton-South Hill Master Drainage Plan
(MOP) prepared for the Town by Downey Associates. The MOP was amended in 1994 and the location of
the pond was changed to the east side of Town line (the current location). The facility was also upgraded
to include quality and erosion control component in compliance with current Authority and Ministry of
Natural Resources requirements.
Pollution.:.
An erosion and sediment control plan and construction staging plan have been submitted and detail
construction methods designed to eliminate sedimentation. This can be achieved through construction
staging and temporary stabilization.
Co.nseL\lation of I ~od:
A comprehensive landscape rehabilitation plan has been submitted. The pond will include emergent,
submergent and terrestrial native material.
E.o.lic.'{-Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program,
Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing and the Bolton-South Hill Master Drainage Plan.
CFN: 27133 Application #:89/95/V AUG
For information cOntact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.08.21.
B429 EXECU1]VE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
(7 5 14)M~vfielrl Golf COIlr~e In~
To place fill within a regulated area On Part Lots 19, 20 and 21, Concession 5 EHS, (12552 Torbram
Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill in order to create a berm for a proposed sediment pond within the Fill Regulated
Area of a tributary of the West Humber River.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998.
(1 ) letter of Undertaking; prepared by Stephen Walker of R.J. Burnside & Associates; File W-572;
signed by Greg Delaat of Mayfield Golf Course Inc.; dated and received August 29, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Proro~~I:
The proposal consists of creating an impermeable earth berm across a remnant draw from the main valley of
a tributary of the West Humber River in order to create a sediment pond. The existing pond (located On the
valley floor) is presently collecting sediment which originates from the localized drainage through the golf
course. The intent of the proposed works is to intercept the sediment-laden runoff in the new sediment
basin so that periodic dredging of the lower pond (and temporary stockpiling within the flood plain) can be
minimized. The subject draw feature is presently manicured, is void of any significant woody vegetation,
and is used as part of the golf course. Also, there is no sign of a watercourse in this draw. The entire
construction site is located within the Fill Regulated Area.
C.Ql1trol of Floorling.:.
No fill placement will occur within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River tributary.
Eallution.:.
Silt fencing will be placed at the toe of the new berm to impede the overland migration of sediment during
construction. The applicants consultant is presently revising the drawings to address Authority staff's
comments with respect to runoff detention time (ie. 25mm control for a detention time of 24 hours) within
the proposed sediment pond.
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nd.:.
Design details are being revised, based on staff's comments regarding the method of construction of the
berm and compaction/erosion protection details. the entire berm will be revegetated with native tree and
shrub species and will blend into the valleywall On either side.
Eolic.v G II i rl eli n as.:.
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(H) - Existing Resource-based Uses - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28091 Application #: 145/96/CAL
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.08.23
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B430
(7 5 15)YMCA of Gre~ter Toronto
To place fill within a regulated area and construct in a flood plain at Roselea Park, in the City of
Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to demolish the existing arena in Roselea Park and COnstruct the new Brampton YMCA
building in the flood plain and regulated area of the Etobicoke Creek.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998.
(1 ) Letter of Undertaking from Mr. Jim Whitehead, General Manager, Facility Development, YMCA of
Greater Toronto; dated and received August 27, 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Prnro!;~1 :
To demolish the existing arena and construct the proposed new Brampton YMCA building in the flood plain
and regulated area of the Etobicoke Creek. The site is part of the City of Brampton Core Special Policy Area
(O.P.A. 58). The site is susceptible to flooding under Regional Storm conditions (the channel conveys the
350 year storm). The proponent has submitted a report and design providing dry flood proofing to an
elevation of 213.0 metres C.G.D. and wet floodproofing to the Regional Storm elevation (215.3 m C.G.D.).
This is in excess of the minimum specification of floodproofing in the Special Policy Area. Dry floodproofing
to the Regional elevation is not technically feasible due to the grades of the surrounding infrastructure and
the requirement for barrier-free access.
e.ollutia.n:
There is a requirement to excavate material for the proposed basement. All fill material will be removed
from the site. excavated material may be temporarily stockpiled On site. Any stockpiled material will be
protected with silt fencing to prevent sediment runoff.
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nrl'
All disturbed areas will be restored On completion of the work.
e.olicy Gllirleline~'
The proposed building is in compliance with the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section
4.2.1 - Development within established communities. It also complies with the policies of the City of
Brampton Core Special Policy Area (O.P.A. 58)
CFN: 28143 Application #: 174/96/BRAM
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.08.21.
B431 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
(7 5 1 fi)Muni~ir~lity of Metrorolit~n Toronto - Der~rtment of PMk~ ~nrl Culture
To place fill within a regulated area On Lambton Woods Park, in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River
Watershed as located On property owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to undertake regrading works and place fill in the flood plain and regulated area of the
Humber River in order to improve an existing pedestrian and bicycle trail.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998
(1 ) Plans; prepared by C.J. Hartley Ltd.; Drawings 1,2,3 and 4; dated July 1996. (Total Plans 4).
(2) Letter of Undertaking from Mr. Roy Bristow of Metro Parks and Culture, File 5408-004-005; dated
and received August 28, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Eroposa1:
To undertake regrading works and place fill in order to establish a normal gravel bicycle and pedestrian trail
in the Lambton Woods ESA (ESA #8). The trail is required to solve an existing access problem which is
resulting in damage to the ESA.
Control of Floorling'
The pathway will be constructed within 150mm of existing grade in order to establish a formal trail and
avoid damaging the root systems of existing treesl. The control of flooding will not be significantly
affected.
Eollution:.
Snow fencing will be erected around the working area in order to limit construction access and
sedimentation.
Conserv~tion of I ~nrl'
The working area has been restricted (see above) to prevent construction access into the ESA. The
formalization of the trail will result in restricting access to the balance of the ESA, which has currently a
network of informal trails. The route has been designed to avoid significant existing woody vegetation.
e.ali~dfrlines:
The works comply with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section 4.2.2(H) -
Existing resource based uses. The lands are owned by the Authority and are under management agreement
with Metropoltan Toronto.
CFN: 28136 Application #: 162/96/ETOB
For information cOntact: Richard Lloyd, ext. 281
Date: 1996.08.23
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B432
(7 5 17)Mr .1 M~rtiM
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 10, Registered Plan 2451, (110 Thompson Avenue), in the City
of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct an addition to an existing residence located in the flood plain of the Mimico
Creek.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998.
(1 ) Letter Report from Alan Walker of A.J.W. Engineering Ltd.; dated August 12, 1996.
(2) Drawings entitled "Proposed Addition - Mr. and Mrs. Martins"; drawn by I. Cunha; Sheets 1,2, 4, 5,
6 and 7; dated August 1, 1996; Drawing 3 redline revised by applicant August 21, 1996. (Total
Drawings 7).
(3) Plans of Standard Water-tight Sealing System (ie. Floodproof Door) ; prepared by NUDORCO
Specialty Door Products Ltd.; received August 27, 1996. (Total Plans 2)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Propo!;al:
To construct a 59m2 (634 ft2) addition to an existing residence located in the flood plain of the Mimico
Creek.
Control of Floorling'
The proposed addition will be structurally dry-flood proofed to the Regional Storm elevation (111.0 metres
C.G.D.). In addition, parts of the existing basement will be retrofitted to include active floodproofing (doors)
and passive flood proofing measures.
Poli~y Gllirleline5.:
The proposal complies with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section 4.2.2
(C) - Minor Additions to existing structures within non-established communities.
CFN: 28137 Application #: 163/96/ETOB
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281)
Date: 1996.08.14.
B433 EXECU11VE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
(7 5 18)Fir~t Profe~~ion~1 M~n~gemp.nt In~
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 4, Concession 1 NOS, (1575 Dundas Street East), in
the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake armourstone toe protection in a flood plain and regulated area of the Little
Etobicoke Creek.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998.
(1 ) Erosion Protection and Planting Details Plan; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather ltd.; Project
96385; Drawing 1 dated August 1996; received August 29, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
RA TIONAlE , ,
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Proro~~I:
To construct armourstone erosion protection works in a regulated and flood plain area of the Little Etobicoke
Creek in order to provide protection to an existing commercial development.
Control of Floorling'
The existing hydraulic cross-section of the channel will not be significantly altered. The control of flooding
will not be affected.
&illution.:.
No works, directly in the channel of the Little Etobicoke Creek, are required. A siltation fence will be
installed adjacent to the watercourse in order to control construction access and prevent runoff entering the
creek.
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nrl'
Riparian plantings, including native shrubs, will be provided adjacent to the channel below the limit of the
armourstone works.
eolicV-Gu irl el i ne ~.
The proposal is in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section
3.3 (D) - Erosion Protection Works required to protect existing development.
CFN: 28098 Application #: 144/96/MISS
For information contact: R. Lloyd, Ext. 281/G. Leja, Ext. 342
Date: 1996.08.22.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B434
(7 5 1 ~)I ee H~II!;m~nn
To construct in a flood plain at 30 Meadowcrest Road, in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek
Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 66 m2 (712 fe) addition to an existing residence located in the flood plain of
the Mimico Creek..
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998.
(1 ) Letter of Undertaking from Lee Hausmann - Stroz, dated and received August 28, 1996 (Total
Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Eroposa1:
To COnstruct a 66 m2 (712 fe) addition to an existing residence located in the flood plain of the Mimico
Creek.. The property is located at the northwest corner of Thompson Avenue and Meadowcrest Boulevard.
There will be nO grade changes or fill placement as part of the proposed construction.
Ca.nt.roLaf Flo orl i n g'
The proposed addition will be structurally dry floodproofed to the Regional Storm flood elevation (110.8 m
C.G.D.l.
Eolllltion'
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works. The construction site is 45 metres from the
watercourse channel.
Consentation of I ~nrl'
All disturbed areas around the new dwelling will be re-sodded following construction.
Eolic.','-Guidelines.:
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program,
Section 4.2.2.IC) - Minor additions to existing structures - non-established communities.
CFN: 28163 Application #: 182/96/ETOB
For information contact: Richard Lloyd (ext. 281), George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.08.26.
B435 EXECU11VE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
(7 5 'O)Mllni~ip~lity of Metrorolit~n Toronto - Der~rtment of P~rk!; ~nrl Cllltllre
To place fill within a regulated area On Part Lot 9, and 10, Concession Kingsmill Reserve, (James
Gardens), in the City of Etobicoke/City of York, Humber River Watershed as located On property
owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to construct a new pedestrian/bicycle pathway in the lower Humber Park system adjacent to
the existing pathway from James Gardens to Etienne Brule Park.
The permit will be issued from September 6. 1996 to September 5, 1998.
(1) Plans; prepared by Victor Ford and Associates; Project 9619; Drawings L 1, L2, L3, L4, L5 and L6;
dated August 1996.
(2) Letter of Undertaking from Mr. Roy Bristow of Metro Parks and Culture; File 5408-004-005; dated
and received August 28, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
&o.posal:
The proposal involves twinning the existing pedestrian trail located in the lower Humber River valley
corridor. Works include the construction of two pedestriant bridges over tributaries of the Humber River
north of Dundas Street and the construction of a stone dust and asphalt path (surface material varies) in
approximately the same alignment as the existing trail. The current single trail has become heavily used by
both pedestrians and cyclists and represents a safety hazard.
Control of Floorling'
The proposed trail will be constructed at existing grade. The control of flooding will not be affected.
&llIutian:
Snow fencing will be erected in areas where the proposed pathway is adjacent to an existing wooded areas
in order to restrict the construction easement and prevent erosion and sedimentation.
Conserv~tion of I ~od:
The alignment has been selected to minimize loss of existing vegetation. The trail is also located outside
the 10 metre riparian zOne. Staff is presently confirming that no areas of erosion hazard currently existing.
An archeological investigation is also being completed.
Poli~y Gllirleline!;'
The proposed works are in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
- Section 4.2.2 (H) - Existing Resource based uses. The area is owned by MTRCA and is managed by Metro
Parks. There will be an additional section of the trail constructed south of Dundas Street, adjacent to
Lambton Manor, once negotiations with the property owners are completed. This section is proposed to be
dealt with as a revision to this application.
CFN: 28139 Application #: 164/96/ETOB
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.08.21.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B436
(7 5 ? 1 )Felgi Inve!;tmentc:: I trl
To alter a watercourse On Part Lot 23, Concession 2, (west of Leslie Street, north of Major
MacKenzie), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located On property owned by
same.
The purpose is to provide road access between two draft approved plans of subdivision, to COnstruct a two
cell box culvert, two temporary crossings, a sanitary sewer crossing and a drain outlet.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 2001
(1 ) Sanitary Sewer Crossing, 19T-94007; Project No. 93:690; Drawing No. 22; prepared by Sabourin
Kimble and Associates Ltd.; received June 20, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
(2) Tempoary Watercourse Crossing and Retails, 19T-94007; Project No. 93:690; Drawing
No. 28; prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., received January 20, 1996. (Total Plans
1 )
(3) Rouge River Crossing Sediment Control, 19T-94007; Project No. 93:690; Drawing
No. 29; prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd., received January 20, 1996. (Total Plans
1 )
(4) Felgi Investments Ltd.; Downstream Foundation Drain Outlet; Project No. 9602J; Drawing No. L-3;
prepared by Todhunter Scholl en and Associates; received June 20, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
(5) Correspondence from Saboring Kimble and Associates to MTRCA undertaking to do valley and
watercouse enhancement satisfactory to MTRCA and MNR; received September 5, 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
&oposa1:
The proposal involves the construction of a twocell box culvert, crossing the Rouge River, to provide a road
connection between two draft approved residential plans of subdivision. The cells will be cast in place and
the total openings will be 34 m wide and approximately 3 m high.
A sanitary sewer will be augured under the watercourse.
Two temporary watercourse crossings of two small tributaries are also proposed. They will consist of
corrugated steel pipes covered with stOne. Both are needed to provide access to the east side of the
sanitary sewer crossing. One of the crossings will also provide access to the east side of the proposed
permanent road.
A foundation drain outfall is to be constructed to the main Rouge River.
Control of Floorling.:.
The proposed opening for the box culverts allows for the passage of the Regional Storm flows without
affecting flood elevations or velocities.
The temporary crossings are to be constructed so as to allow over-topping during large storm events. The
temporary crossings, foundation drain outfall, and sanitary sewer crossing will not affect the Regional Storm
flood elevations.
Polllltion;
Access to the culvert crossing of the main Rouge River and to the sanitary sewer crossing will be provided
from both sides of the watercourse. No machinery will enter the watercourse.
If required, water from dewatering for the construction of the culvert foundations will be pumped to two
B437 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
settling basins before the water enters the watercourse.
The temporary watercourse crossings are to be constructed during low flow conditions. Two on-line
sediment traps will be installed downstream to capture sediment in the tributaries before water enters the
main Rouge channel.
Sediment fencing will be installed prior to the start of all works to prevent sediment from entering the
watercourse and to control access to the sites.
Con!;erv~tion of I ;:Inrl'
The valley corridor through this reach generally has gently sloping valley walls and little woody vegetation.
The watercourse is actively meandering. The culvert design for the road crossing spans the watercourse and
does not directly impact fish habitat. The proposed works will not impact any sensitive or significant valley
features. A restoration and enhancement plan is proposed for the valley corridor and the watercourse.
Because of the meandering nature of the watercourse, the proposal includes streambank stabilization at five
meander sites to prevent erosion at the culvert and road crossing. The protection will be buried in the
ground adjacent to the streambank and will not impact the bank or watercourse during construction. In
addition, rocky ramps will be installed in the watercourse at four riffle sections to prevent the watercourse
from downcutting.
One additional streambank site which is coincident with the valley slope and downstream of the culvert
crossing is eroding. At this location, the streambank will be graded back, lined with stone and planted to
stabilise the toe.
The foundation drain outfall will be located 25 m from the watercourse and empty into an infiltration trench.
This design will prevent erosion at the outfall and assist in maintaining the cool ground water input to the
watercourse.
The riparian area is to be enhanced with woody vegetation, wetlands and wet meadows.
Poli~y GlIirleline!;'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as it
relates to Section 4.3 -Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28050 Application #:127/96/RH
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (Ext. 304)
Date: 1996.08.12.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B438
(7 5 ")Region of York
To COnstruct in a flood plain On Lot 35, Concession 1 WYS, (Highway 407 and the Don River), in
the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake emergency repairs to a failed sanitary sewer adjacent to the Don River.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998.
(1 ) Site Plan Details; prepared by MacViro; revised as received on August 29, 1996 (Total Plans 11
(2) Planting Details; prepared by CHIC; as received on August 21, 1996 (Total Plans 11
(31 Letter of Undertaking regarding work staging; prepared by MacViro Consultants Inc. as received on
August 29, 1996. (Documents 11
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
&aposa1:
The applicant has begun emergency repairs to a failed sanitary sewer adjacent to the Don River. The
sanitary sewer which is 2 metres from the watercourse and four feet below the existing grade, has partially
collapsed. The applicant has placed sheet piling between the sewer and the watercourse and has begun the
process of dewatering the site as required to repair the sewer. Once the site is dewatered, the sewer will
be replaced and the site restored to original grades.
Control of Floo.cling.:.
There will be no impact On the control of flooding as the site will be returned to original grades.
EalLutian:
Sediment fencing has been erected between the works and the watercourse. In addition, a dewater basin
has been constructed to allow for treatment of effluent.
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nrl'
The area of the repair has been disturbed as a result of the Highway 407 works. A detailed regeneration
plan to be implemented in the fall, has been provided by CHIC, the consultants for the Highway 407
project, which includes the area of the sewer replacement.
Poli~y Guirleline!;'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28155 Application #: 179/96/RH
For information cOntact: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.08.21
B439 EXECUT.IVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
(7 5 '~)Mr ~nrl Mr~ .I Dp.mer~
To COnstruct in a flood plain on Lot 8, Registered Plan 2478, (30 Plymbridge Crescent - Hogg's
Hollow), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a third floor addition Onto the existing two-storey dwelling, as well as expand a
dining/sitting room On the ground floor, within the Regional Storm flood plain of the West Don River.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998.
(1 ) Plans; prepared by William Mockler & Associates ltd.; Project 96019; Drawing A1 dated July 16,
1996, received August 22, 1996; Drawings A.4 dated July 16, 1996 and A.5 dated August 12,
1996; received August 30, 1996. (Total Plans 3)
(2) Floodproofin9 Report; prepared by Moon-Matz ltd., Consulting Engineers; Reference 1540-302-04
dated August 29, 1996; received August 30, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
ProrO!;~I:
The proposal consists of the Construction of a third floor addition onto the existing two-storey single family
dwelling and expansion of a dining/sitting room on the ground floor. The entire property is located within
the Regional Storm flood plain of the West Don River and the Hogg's Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). No
fill placement is proposed as part of the construction.
Control of Floorling'
The existing dwelling was previously approved in 1988 by the Executive Committee, (Permit C-0693) and
was flood proofed to above the level of the 350 year storm, which is the minimum level for flood protection
as specified in the Hogg's Hollow SPA.
Eallution.:.
No sedimentation will be generated from the site as existing grades will note be altered.
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nrl'
All disturbed areas around the perimeter of the dwelling will be grass-seeded or sodded following
construction.
Poli~y GlIirlelinp.!;'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification within
Established Communities/Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program and the Hogg's Hollow SPA (North York Official Plan Amendment 375).
CFN: 28156 Application #: 180/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.08.23.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B440
(7 5 '4)~tevp. ~t~vro/~evenrlon Holrling!;
To alter a watercourse On Part Lot 10, Concession 4, (ease side of Woodbine Avenue, south of
Highway 7) in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located On property owned by
same.
The purpose is to Construct a custom designed steel bridge across a channelized portion of the Beaver
Creek, to provide a vehicular access connection between a proposed car dealership and its car storage
compound, and to COnstruct two stormwater outfalls in the channel.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998
(1 ) General Arrangement Plans; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather Ltd.; Project 96381; Drawings
1,2 and 3; dated September 1996; received September 4, 1996. (Total Plans 3)
(2) Outfall Detail Plans; prepared by Setchell and McKinnon Ltd.; Project 95-57; Drawing 2001-1; dated
June 14, 1996; revised September 3, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
(3) Letter of Undertaking from Mr. R. David Stewart, P. Eng. of Cosburn Patterson Mather ltd.; dated
and received September 4, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Eroposal :
The proposal involves the construction of a custom designed steel bridge across a channelized reach of the
Beaver Creek to provide a "light duty" road access from a proposed car dealership to its car storage
compound, and to construct two stormwater outfalls, one for the proposed car dealership and one for the
car compound.
Control of Floorling'
The proposed crossing is designed to allow for the passage of the 2 year storm and will be over topped
under a 5 year storm. Regional Flood flows will increase upstream water levels within the channel block;
however, the water level increase will remain in the channel block and will be contained to the applicable
property.
fullut.ion;.
No works, directly in the channel of the Beaver Creek, are required. A siltation control fence will be
installed surrounding the work area in order to control construction access and prevent runoff entering the
creek.
.c.on!;erv~tion of I ~nrl'
Riparian plantings, including native shrubs and trees, will be provided within the channel block to augment
the existing vegetation. The bridge provides a clear span of the low flow channel and does not directly
affect fish habitat. Riprap stone will be utilized to prevent erosion at the storm water outlets.
Poli~y Gllirleline!;'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as it
relates to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 27543 Application #:229/95/MARK
For information contact: Mark Christie (ext. 2801
Date: 1996.08.26.
B441 EXECUtIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
(7 5 ?5)Thp. Mllni~ir::!lity of Metrorolit~n Toronto
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 13, Concession 1, (Morningside Park), in the City of
Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located On property owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to repair two existing weirs that protect a sanitary sewer.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998
(1 ) East Highland Creek Sanitary Armourstone Weir Maintenance Location Plan; prepared by Metro
Works Dept.; Drawing 1; as received on August 24, 1996. (Total Plans 1).
(2) Armourstone Weir Typical Section; prepared by Metro Works Dept.; Drawing 2; as received on
August 24, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
(3) Access Details; prepared by Metro Works Dept.; Drawing 3; as received on August 20, 1996. (Total
Plans 1).
(4) Temporary Creek Crossing Details; Drawing 4; as received on September 4, 1996. (Total Plans 11.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
ProrO!;~1 :
Two existing weirs located On the Highland Creek in Morningside Park that protect an existing sanitary trunk
sewer require repair. Metro Works is proposing to dismantle the weirs and reconstruct rocky ramps to
stabilise the invert of the stream bed and provide protection of the sanitary sewer.
Control of Floorling'
The control of flooding will not be affected by this work.
Eolhltion'
Machinery will be working from a river run stone pad in the watercourse. This technique will minimise the
amount of sediment suspended in the water.
Can~erv~tion of I ~nd:
The removal of the weirs and construction of rocky ramps will result in the removal of two fish barriers On
the Highland Creek.
Access to the sites are yet to be determined but will be designed to minimise impact to the riparian
vegetation and the watercourse.
Woody riparian vegetation will be planted where appropriate in disturbed areas to stabilise the stream bank
and enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitats.
Poli~y Gllirlelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as it
relates to Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 27948 Application #: 075/96/SCAR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.08.02
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B442
(7 5 ?fi)City of ~~~rhnrollgh
To alter a watercourse south of Lawrence Avenue, east of Markham Road (Cedarbrook Park), in the
City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located On property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake streambank protection works through Cedarbrook Park.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998
(1 ) City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watercourse Improvement and Slope Stabilization Project; Plan
Nos. 6696-A-1, 6696-A-2, 669-A-3, 6696-A-4, 6696-A-5, 6696-A-6,
6696-A-7, 6696-A-8, 6696-A-9, 6696-A-11, 6096-A-12, 6696-A-13, 6696-A-14; prepared by
Aquafor Beech Limited; as received on August 13, 1996. (Total Plans 13).
(2) Letter of Undertaking describing pool locations; prepared by Todhunter Schollen and Associates; as
received on September 4, 1996. (Total Documents 1).
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Eroposal:
A Municipal Class Environmental Assessment for Water and Wastewater was undertaken to determine the
best approach to protect four developed sites that are threatened by stream bank erosion and co-incident
slope erosion in Cedarbrook Park. At the first erosion site the valley slope is 3 m high and is threatening a
trail and recreation area; at the second site the slope is 10m high and is threatening a parking lot and
community centre; and, at the third and fourth site the slope is 8 m high and is threatening two residential
properties.
Approximately 360 m of the watercourse is to be re-aligned and pulled away from the toe of the valley
slope. At the four sites the slope will be graded, covered with stone and planted. To control the down
cutting of the invert, rock ramps will be installed at 5 locations through the reach. The watercourse has
been designed using natural channel design principles.
Control of Floociing.:
The works will not impact the control of flooding
Polllltion'
All work will be done in the dry by diverting flow around the site. All disturbed areas will be stabilised with
seed, mulch or sod immediately following the work.
Con!;erv~tion of I ~nrl:
The access and Construction areas are to be delineated by post and wire fence and reinstated to existing
condition immediately following Construction.
The riparian area is to be planted with native woody material in a manner that is compatible with the active
use of the park and that will assist in stabilising the stream banks and will enhance the aquatic and
terrestrial habitats.
Ministry of Natural Resources staff have reviewed the concept as it relates to fish habitat and find it
acceptable.
B443 EXECU11VE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6 , 1996
Poli~y Gllirlp.line~'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as it
relates to Section 3.2 (Establishing Corridor Boundaries and Alterations).
CFN: 28010 Application #: 1 04/96/SCAR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext.304)
Date: 1996.08.15.
(7 5 ?7) 11~1??4 Ont~rio (trl
To Construct in a flood plain on Part Lots A and B, Registered Plan 449, (53 Woodbridge Avenue),
in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a temporary sales pavilion for a proposed condominium development in the
flood plain of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued from September 6, 1996 to September 5, 1998 in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; prepared by R. Varacelli, Architect; Job 96-39; Drawing A 1 dated August 21, 1996;
Drawings A2, A3 and A4 dated August 13, 1996. (Total Drawings 4).
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff On the basis of the following information:
Eroposa1:
The proposal is to Construct a temporary sales pavilion in the flood plain of the Humber River (Main Branch).
The sales pavilion will be utilized in conjunction with the proposed Gateway to Woodbridge condominium
project, located on the former factory site at 53 Woodbridge Avenue within the Woodbridge Special Policy
Area.
Control of FJoorling'
The proposed sales pavilion will be dry floodproofed above the 1 :350 year storm flood elevation; the
minimum level specified in the Special Policy Area. Due to the temporary nature of the structure,
floodproofing to the Regional Storm elevation was not deemed necessary.
Co.oserv~tion of I ~nd.:.
The site of the proposed temporary structure is slated to be part of a landscaped park system adjacent to
the condominium. An agreement has been signed with the City of Vaughan to ensure that the structure will
be removed. The landscaping and walkway will be undertaken as part of the overall site development,
which will be the subject of a future permit application.
Poli~y Gllirleline!;'
The proposal is in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, Section
4.2.1 - Development within established communities and the Woodbridge Special Policy Area criteria (City
of Vaughan Official Plan Amendment 440).
CFN: 28153 Application #:177/96/VAUG
For information contact: Richard Lloyd, Plans Analyst, Ext. 281
Date: 1996.09.05.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/96, SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 B444
RES #8129/96- BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE
Business Plan Sub-Committee Report
Adoption of recommendations of the Black Creek Pioneer Village Business Plan Sub-
Committee. (Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board Res.
#C17/96)
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT Recommendation 3 of the Black Creek Pioneer Village Business Plan Sub-Committee Report, regarding
a review of the Authority's governance structure be referred to the Executive Committee and;
THAT a detailed governance review be initiated and reported on as soon as possible.
AMENDMENT
RES #8130/96
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT staff prepare a preliminary report of options and considerations for the reorganization of the current
Authority governance structure, and report back to the next Executive Committee Meeting.
THE AMENDMENT WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11: 15 a.m., September 6, 1996.
Ri~h:mf O'Rrien .1 Cr~ig M#lthAr
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/pl
Please note that Res. #8131/96 & 8132/96 have not been used.
~
, the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #9/96 Page B445
October 11, 1 996
The Executive Committee met in the South Theatre, in the Visitor's Centre at Black Creek Pioneer
Village, on Friday, October 11,1996. The Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:00
a.m.
PRESENT
Lois Griffin ............................................................ Member
Lois Hancey ................................................. Vice Chair, Authority
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Joan King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard O'Brien. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair, Authority
Richard Whitehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
REGRETS
Michael Di Biase ........................................................ Member
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
RES #B133/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #8/96, held September 6, 1996, be approved. . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
B446 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES #B 134/96 - SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS
East side of Islington Avenue, South of Rutherford Road, City of
Vaughan
Regional Municipality of York
1. Sale to Blackplate Investments Inc.
2. Sale to Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, Franciscan Brothers
Status report on progress toward for the completion of land sales in
the vicinity of Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road.CFN #27612B
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report dated September 27,
1996. relating to the status of processing the sale of surplus Authority-owned tablelands.
situate on the east side of Islington Avenue. south of Rutherford Road. City of Vaughan,
The Regional Municipality of York. be received. ........................ CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #6\96, held on July 26, 1996, under Resolution #A 133\96, Members
of the Authority approved the sale of the subject lands.
ANALYSIS
Since the Authority meeting of July 26, 1996, substantial progress has been made towards
the closing of the two transactions. Executed agreements are at hand from each of the
parties and the initial deposits have been credited to the account of the Authority. A
summary of the status of the two transactions is as follows.
Executive Summary of Transactions
1. Blackplate Investments Inc. (Purchaser now changed to Islington Woods
Developments Ltd. as provided by Agreement of Purchase and Sale)
Area to be purchased : 10.271 acres (as per final draft of survey plan currently at
hand),
. an additional 0.793 acres will be conveyed to the purchaser or the City
of Vaughan to facilitate an access road being constructed by the
purchaser, from Islington Avenue between the lands being sold to
Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, Franciscan Brothers
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B447
Purchase price: $1,848,780.00
Conditions and approvals:
(a) an extension to October 25, 1996, has been granted to allow the purchaser the
opportunity of carrying out the initial due diligence review. Upon the waiving of this
condition, the $135,000.00 initial deposit will become non-refundable.
(b) applications have been submitted to the appropriate authorities for the following
approvals:
(I) land severance - this will be dealt with at the Committee of Adjustment
Hearing scheduled for October 24, 1996
(ii) official plan amendment - the first stage of this process consisting of a public
meeting at The City of Vaughan Municipal Offices will take place on October
21, 1996
(c) approval of the Minister of Natural Resources - Upon completion of the legal survey,
the Authority submission to the Minister will be submitted during early October,
1996
(d) Re-zoning and draft plan approval - The purchaser has advised that applications in
this regard will be submitted prior to December 31, 1996. This is substantially
earlier than anticipated at the time the agreement was arranged and the closing date
in the best case scenario, could be during 1997 which would be substantially earlier
than the time frame estimated by staff at the July meeting.
Archaeological : Authority staff is in the process of carrying out the archaeological
investigation at the cost of the purchaser.
2. Father Claudio Moser, In Trust (Franciscan Brothers)
In the process of determining the boundaries of the parcels of surplus land in order to obtain
a suitable area of table land to facilitate the proposed institutional and residential uses, the
area of the lands to be sold for institutional uses was extended further south than earlier
anticipated by the purchaser. A certain portion of the southerly land to be sold to Father
Claudio Moser, In Trust, is zoned 05-2 "open space" rather than the A "Agriculture" zoning
as on the northerly lands. In order to allow the land to be used for institutional purposes
and facilitate construction of the Retreat Centre, it is necessary for the land to be re-zoned
from 05-2 to A "Agriculture".
The offer submitted by the purchaser was on the basis of the land being available with
appropriate zoning to facilitate early construction. The requirement for a re-zoning has
resulted in the purchaser requesting an extension to the due diligence conditional period.
B448 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
Area to be purchased: 10.846 acres, (as per final draft of survey plan currently at
hand)
Purchase price: $1,518,440.00
Initial deposit credited to the Authority - $75,000.00
Conditions and Approvals:
(a) An extension of the due diligence period to October 15, 1996, has been granted to
allow the purchaser to carry out his due diligence review. It will be necessary to
extend this period to on, or before, November 12, 1996, while making the closing
subject to the re-zoning being in place to facilitate institutional uses.
(b) Applications have been submitted to the appropriate authorities for the following
approvals:
(I) land severance - this will be dealt with at the Committee of Adjustment
Hearing scheduled for October 24, 1996
(ii) Re-zoning - the first stage of this process consisting of a public meeting at
The City of Vaughan Municipal Offices will take place on October 21, 1996.
(c) Approval of the Minister of Natural Resource,s - Upon completion of the legal survey,
the Authority submission to the Minister will be submitted during early October,
1996
Archaeological : Authority staff is in the process of carrying out the archaeological
investigation at the cost of the purchaser.
Site Plan: A number of preliminary concept plans of the high school and retreat
centre have been prepared. It is the intention of the purchaser to
attempt to seek site plan approval at the City during October, 1996.
Summary
1. While there are no assurances that all conditions required to be completed can be
met, Authority staff are optimistic that the sale to Father Moser, In Trust, will close
during late 1996 and that the sale to Blackplate Investments Inc. (Now Islington
Woods Developments Ltd. may close as early as 1997.
2. Due to the requirement for the unexpected re-zoning on a portion of the land being
sold to Father Claudio Moser, In Trust, for institutional purposes, it was necessary to
extend the due diligence period until October 15, 1996. In order to accommodate
delays resulting from the time required to arrive at a suitable land configuration and
the re-zoning, it will be necessary to extend the due diligence period for Father
Claudio Moser, In Trust, until November 12, 1996 and the condition on re-zoning
until the closing date.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B449
3. Due to the length of time required to arrive at a suitable land configuration to
facilitate both sales, it was necessary to extend the due diligence period for
Blackplate Developments to October 25, 1996. It is anticipated that the purchaser
will not require any further extensions in this regard.
Report prepared by:
Don J. Prince, extension 221
RES #B 135/96- REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL
Receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of Peel to provide a
permanent easement for a proposed water main and storm sewer outlet
and an existing sanitary sewer, located north of King Road, in the Bolton
Area, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel.CFN 28198
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from The Regional Municipality
of Peel to provide a permanent easement for a proposed water main and storm sewer outlet
and an existing sanitary sewer, located north of King Road, in the Bolton Area, Town of
Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Regional Municipality of Peel in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.049 hectares, more or less, (0.121 acres) be
granted to the Regional Municipality of Peel for a proposed water main and storm sewer
outlet and an existing sanitary sewer, said land being Part of Lots 21 and 184, Block 1, on a
Plan of the Village of Bolton referred to as Plan Bol-7, Town of Caledon, Regional
Municipality of Peel, designated as Part 1 on a Plan of Survey prepared by Marshall Macklin
Monaghan Ontario Limited as their Drawing Number 20-96-174-000;
THA T consideration is to be $2.00 plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THA T said easement is subject to obtaining approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21 (2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27, as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
B450 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
BACKGROUND
The subject Authority holding is part of a much larger area, acquired from Sorrento
Developments Limited et al on October 1, 1982 and from Replete Investments Limited on
February 25, 1983 under the Humber River Flood Plain lands Component of the land
Acquisition Project. The Regional Municipality of Peel has conveyed lands to the Authority
over the years for the nominal consideration of $2.00 and have requested that this
easement be granted for the nominal consideration of $2.00. The Region will be responsible
for all survey, legal and other costs associated with completion of this transaction.
ANALYSIS
The Authority's technical staff have reviewed the technical details of the proposed
construction and are satisfied. A report will be brought forward to the Executive Committee
for consideration at a future date regarding a permit under Ontario Regulation 158 for the
construction.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The subject Authority-owned lands are under a Management Agreement with the Town of
Caledon. The Town will continue to be responsible for all maintenance and realty tax costs
associated with this property. A plan illustrating this location is attached.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, extension 223
B451
8452 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
RES #8136/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1996-
2000
Flood Plain and Conservation Component Duffins Creek Watershed
1121687 Ontario Limited CFN 27461, Purchase of property located
west of Brock Road, Hamlet of Claremont, in the Town of Pickering,
under the "Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1996-2000"
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 2.033 acres, more or less, be
purchased from 1121687 Ontario Limited, said land consisting of an irregular shaped parcel
of land being Part Lot 18, Concession 9, and Part of the Road Allowance between Lots 18
and 19, Concession 9, Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrances,
subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land
transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #131/95, Authority Meeting #4/95, May 26, 1995 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed this proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
This proposed acquisition severs in two a property owned by 1121687 Ontario Limited.
The easterly portion of the property is presently zoned "Storage and Light Manufacturing"
and the westerly portion is presently zoned "Village Residential". The Authority's technical
staff and the Town of Pickering have reviewed this location and have no objection to the
proposed transaction.
A plan illustrating the specific location is attached.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B453
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
The property is a well forested ground water discharge area and stream corridor located in
the headwaters of the Duffins Creek. It also provides a habitat linkage and riparian habitat
zone and is a type 1 cold water fishery. The acquisition of this property also provides an
opportunity for a trail system through the Village of Claremont.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
Based on realty taxes paid on other Authority lands at this location, it is estimated that the
realty taxes will be approximately $150. per year. 1121687 Ontario Limited has agreed to
pay the realty taxes on the property for a two year period.
Authority staff is responsible for maintaining Authority lands in this area and the addition of
this property will not have any significant impact on maintenance costs.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004-11-502 - Flood Control Hazard Account.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, extension 223
....
\
8454 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
r
\ ~' fj- I' \:': - - r .. - - - .' n .._' _'. ....J "' . . . .'_ - - .- -- . - -
~ .,. ,.", J.
r\ . - f, ,-' .J
M 1, ':" i: --....J."'" ,.
j . j . '.
I. r-:-'- _ -'. .: '.0' ,:i /,j \. \ -I
# - ~;).: \.' . ,'..= i' 'Ji { _-:::r(-IJ
. r ( .-'" _r ..'(' ...,-..-.
-.- 1--" .. 0
, ., ~
- . ..... ~ '. '.. . I , - I _ ~
;..;~ \........... \ t J.... .' . _
\ I 7 . Joo -' -';. ,
." -- \
/1~'" .
. .
~. .~o
. ''',0 ""0,
'. .
, I
o .. ). !
. \. ~ ' !'
\0 '"
.JM-' '1 '\ _,oJ.....
~s . \
. ,
o
no
. . · il
-_.....-, - I~ ~-lll
~ ~ .
I \ .
J'? 21"0'. , I
( ;' ; . /() .
, I__~ _~/(. . I
,.~ .
" . ~.31 :
I ,?I 0 \ . "- \ '.:
_---.J ~'" ~ ,\ ,I
.. - IT' 0 ~.~
.... --_.__~' )]1 ' I
--. .
. - . ~ I
r. I
. I I.
:c:'\ \:. " " [.
~ . \; I ..~~
,..... J /'" r,:::::- ".
\ ,-(/' \\
. V . I
;l ,I .-
. I ~o:ff' "
, \ . ) r ". r::> \\ ~-
: :r ~ \ . # '~,.
I I 1\ ' \\
I . II- I II : ~
.. - . J ) ! 1\: ~
.. _ -' . .0 U \1CLAREMON'T"\
~. ""~i'\ I(
f .. I ,.' ~illo~ .
J \ r ,"\i~-
\ I d"~---
. AUTHOIUTYLANDs \\
~ 0 , ,""o'~ ,-_y ~. - ... ..-
. ""t--: ~ :
\ .....:.. \ .
. ~ I :--.....
'oj . '-J 0- / i ) ·
. ) !, ~.,"J.' _
\, \\ ~ ' -'.' ,~. o~
.... - . ~ .p' sS\ot" y.! \. ..
.{ \ '~o~ct; \f \... ~\\ -
\,----, ~o~.9/ ~ 11 c;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B455
RES #B137/96 - SALE OF LANDNICINITY OF 20 PINEWAY BOULEVARD
City of North York, Takvor Hopyan,CFN 27895
Receipt of a request from The Metropolitan Toronto Encroachment
Review Committee to explore the possibility of a sale of a small
fragment of tableland.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whithead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority, is in receipt of a request from The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto Encroachment Review Committee, to proceed with a sale of a small
fragment of Authority-owned tableland, situate adjacent to 20 Pineway Boulevard, in the
City of North York, in The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to complete a sale to Takvor Hopyan in this instance;
THAT a small fragment of Authority-owned tableland containing 0.007 acres, more or less,
be sold to Takvor Hopyan, said land being Part of lot 1, Registered Plan MX-10, City of
North York, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
THAT the Authority request the approval of The Minister of Natural Resources to complete
the sale of the subject land on the following terms and conditions:
(a) The sale price is to be the sum of $1,590;
(b) Takvor Hopyan are to pay the costs for legal and survey and must obtain the
approval of the land Division Committee of the City of North York;
(c) Completion of this sale will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be
required for the severance. Any additional planning approvals which the purchaser
may desire, or the municipality requires, will be at the expense of the purchaser;
(d) The transaction is to be completed at the earliest possible date with payment in full,
being made to the Authority on closing.
Continued...
B456 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
THAT the sale be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance
with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as
amended;
AND FURTHER THAT appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Metropolitan Toronto Encroachment Review Committee and Metro Parks and Culture
are recommending the sale of this small fragment of tableland.
The potential disposal of this fragment of land was brought to the attention of the Members
of the Executive Committee on June 11, 1993, and under Resolution #E86/93, staff were
directed to report back to the Executive Committee recommending further action at a later
date.
The subject parcel of land consists of a fragment of tableland being part of a much larger
area acquired from Don River Heights Limited, in April, 1963, under Willowdale Dam and
Reservoir Project.
The Authority's technical staff and the City of North York have reviewed this location and
have no objection to the proposed sale.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the proceeds from this sale be used to acquire high priority lands required
under approved Authority Land Acquisition Projects.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, Ext. 223
,
4_
/
~~.-- ,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 8457
! -
..--,
'\..i
------- -- ---- .- - - -----
- /!~- / ''''"-7J.- - ~~ -.
'.Jc..
' ~.,~:--~ -:-'=""""'e --
AE: - -
-....
~
-
~l
~ !
'.
.. -
.. ()
'~'l
i .,
I
"
:
i .
..
I .Q
:.1 ..
Q
-:'t: 0
.
( .-
L . 4.S4' :00 -
, .....
II
~: -
-
...
B458 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RES #B138/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Hauling and Disposal of Contaminated Soil
Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #40/96, September 27, 1996
Tender #ES96-33. Award of contract for the hauling and disposal of
contaminated soil from the Don Valley Brick Works site.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT Contract ES96-33 for the hauling and disposal of contaminated soil from the Don
Valley Brick Works site be awarded to Active Excavating and Contracting (1985) Limited at
the unit price of $32 per tonne to a total cost of $43,200 plus G.S.T. ........ CARRIED
BACKGROUND
There are three large underground storage tanks existing on the Don Valley Brick Works site.
All three contain petroleum products, and soil tests show that the surrounding soil is
contaminated with hydrocarbons. To remediate the site, the petroleum products and tanks
will need to be removed. In addition, a certain volume of soil will need to be removed and
replaced with clean fill in order to meet Ministry of Environment and Energy guidelines.
Tenders were invited from contractors for the various components of the project. These
include:
- petroleum removal and disposal;
- tank removal and disposal
- soil removal and disposal; and
- supply of clean backfill material.
The MTRCA will supervise the excavation of the soil as well as the placement of the backfill
material, which will be carried out by Sartor and Susin Ltd., the Authority's equipment
supplier.
RA TIONALE
Pursuant to the Authority's purchasing policy, Executive approval is required for the award
of Contract ES96-33 for the hauling and disposal of contaminated soil, this being the only
contact exceeding $25,000 in total cost.
The lowest unit price received was from Active Excavating and Grading Limited to dispose
of the soil at a licensed disposal facility at a price of $32 per tonne.
Based on a total estimated 1,350 tonnes of soil to be removed from the vicinity of the
underground storage tanks 1, 2 and 3, the total cost for the soil removal will be $43,200
plus G.S.T.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B459
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in Account No. 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley
Brick Works Regeneration Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of
Ontario, and The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
For information contact:
Nick Saccone, Ext. 301
RES #B139/96 - REQUEST TO REVIEW LEGAL REPRESENTATION
Responding to Authority direction and a Council Resolution of the Town
of Caledon asking the MTRCA to consider certain matters about its legal
representation at an Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing related to
the Town's Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 114.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT the correspondence received from Mr. John G. Parkinson of Gardiner, Roberts
advising that there is no conflict arising from the Authority using the same solicitor as the
Town of Orangeville at the upcoming OMB Hearing related to OPA 114 be received and
acknowledged as having satisfactorily responded to the Authority's direction;
THAT Authority staff be directed to continue to rely on the services of Ms. J. Matera of
Gardiner, Roberts during the pre-hearing phase of the OPA 114 hearing as substantive
issues are not being discussed and Authority costs are reduced;
AND FURTHER THAT in recognition of the Town of Caledon's concerns, Authority staff be
directed to retain legal counsel from Gardiner, Roberts other than Ms. J. Matera for any part
of the OPA 114 hearing where the Town of Orangeville's issue must be argued concurrently
with the Authority's position. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
8460 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #6/96, held on July 26, 1996, the following direction was given:
"That staff review what, if any, conflict may exist in using the same solicitor as the
Town of Orange vi lie at the upcoming OMS Hearing related to OPA 114 and report
back to the Executive Committee. ·
The Authority is also in receipt of a Council Resolution dated August 12, 1996, from the
Town of Caledon (attached) that advises that the Town is satisfied that there is no conflict
of interest with respect to the Authority's legal representation; however, has requested the
Authority to consider whether it is in the public interest for a public body (MTRCA) that is
supportive of the Town's planning documents to be represented by the same legal counsel
as is representing a public body (Orangeville) that is opposed to at least some provisions of
the same document notwithstanding that there is no direct conflict of issues.
These issues arose subsequent to the Executive Committee direction given at Meeting
#4/96, June 4, 1996.
"RES. #869/96-
THA T staff be authorized to represent Authority interests before the Ontario
Municipal 80ard Hearing on the referrals to the Town of Caledon Official Plan
Amendment 114 and related consolidated planning documents and land development
applications;
THA T staff continue to pursue the resolution of Authority issues in cooperation with
relevant parties and/or participants prior to the Hearing;
THA T Gardiner, Roberts be retained as legal counsel, as required;
AND FURTHER THA T the Town of Caledon, the Regional Municipality of Peel and the
Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing be so advised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED"
CURRENT STATUS
Ms. Josephine Matera of Gardiner, Roberts was retained in June to represent the Authority
in the matter of OPA 114 and related consolidations. Ms. Matera was also retained by the
Town of Orangeville. Ms. Matera has been representing the Authority and the Town of
Orangeville at pre-hearing conferences and OMB directed meetings concerning OPA 114 that
began late June and are still in progress.
A key focus of the pre-hearing discussions is the determination by the Board as to which
additional planning matters related to OPA 114 will be consolidated with the OPA 114
hearing and the order in which the various planning matters will be heard. The pre-hearing
discussions involve procedural matters primarily, and articulation of the positions of the
parties on the planning issues, not the determination of the substantive planning issues
which will be considered at the hearing which is scheduled to begin in January 1997.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B461
OPA 114 is the Town's growth management document setting out its policies on such
matters as population and settlement areas. OPA 124 is the Town's environmental
management document setting out its policies on such matters as greenspace protection
and the management of natural hazards, water and natural heritage resources. Authority
staff provided input to both of these planning documents and has an interest in the OMB
hearing primarily to safeguard the policy provisions set out in OPA 124 which are being
challenged by others. The Town of Orangeville's issue is associated with provisions of OPA
114.
ANALYSIS AND RATIONALE
Cnnfli~t nf Intp-rp-~t
Attached is a letter prepared by Mr. John G. Parkinson of Gardiner, Roberts which responds
to the issue raised regarding "conflict of interest". Mr. Parkinson's letter identifies the very
limited nature of the interest of the Town of Orangeville which is strictly related to OPA 114
and does not involve environmental or other issues which might be "in conflict" with the
position of the MTRCA. Also noted is that their area of interest is outside the jurisdiction of
MTRCA.
Authority staff is satisfied that there is no "conflict of interest" with the Authority's legal
representation which is consistent with the Town of Caledon's position as set out in their
resolution.
Pllhli~ Intp-rp-~t
The Town of Caledon resolution speaks to a perception that it may not be in the public
interest for the Authority to be represented by the same legal counsel as is representing the
Town of Orangeville. The Town of Orangeville has taken issue with certain provisions of the
Town of Caledon's planning document.
Ms. Matera was retained prior to this issue being raised. Staff believe it is appropriate to
continue to rely on Ms. Matera's services during the pre-hearing phase of the OPA 114
hearing as the issues being discussed are not substantive in nature and the Authority can
continue to realize a cost saving associated with Ms. Matera's services as her time is being
billed equally between the Authority and the Town of Orangeville. In addition, maintaining
continuity of representation during the pre-hearing discussions is preferred.
Staff believe it would be appropriate to avoid a situation arising during the hearing where
Ms. Matera would be called upon to argue the interests of both of her clients at the same
time. This situation may be avoided by the order in which the Board hears the various
planning matters (growth management issues may be heard on separate days from
environmental management issues) or there may be a resolution to the Town of
Orangeville's issue prior to the hearing commencing.
Should it not be possible to avoid the situation where Authority and Town of Orangeville
issues are being dealt with at the same time, staff will ensure that new legal counsel is
retained from Gardiner, Roberts to represent the Authority at the hearing. Gardiner, Roberts
has confirmed that they will absorb the in-house costs of transferring our file.
Report prepared by: J. Dillane (Ext. 220) and R. Jarrett (Ext. 315)
B462 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
W-=3~~~
. 'G.~ ~
Town of Caledcn
Date:August 12. 1996
-1cr<J-L~ /. c: S I' ~
Moved by: _ ~ Seconded ~. . .:.........& -~
~.~y.\\E.~
WHEREAS the MettcPOlIIan TorcntD and Region Conserva!iCn Auttlcrfty (M'T'RCA) and The
Cclpo.atIon otthe Town of Orang8llille (Orangeville) are represent8d by the sarneleqa1 counsel in
I'8Sp8Ct at praceedings b81cr8 ltla Ontario Munici;Jal Board with regard to 0lTIcial Plan Amendment
Ne. t 14 (OPA 1 t~ and other nJiat8d matters. including Official Plan Amendm8nt No. 124 (CPA
124);
AND WHEREAS the MTMCA is considered to be supportive at:he provisions of CPA #1~4 and ,
OPA 1124 a:s 1tley agpty Wllt'lin that part at tI'le Town crt CaJeccn over which the MTRCA's
jurisdic:ion extends;
AND WHEREAS Orangeville haS 3lBmC1 tI'lat it is oppcsed to cenain provisions at OPA ;#114 in
respect atttlat part attll8 Town at Caledcn lying ~Iy scuth atttla Town of OrangaviDe;
AND WHEREAS. beCaUSe tl18 MTr!CA's jurisdiction ec8S not axmnd cver1ha% part of ttl9 Town of
Caledcn lying immediataly scuttl otthe Town of Orangevme. there is net new. and it s net
antic:pated that tI'lere will be a dIt8C: ccnmc: betNeen the pasilicns at the MTRCJ. and Orangeville
durtng the course of the proceedings b8far8 tha Ontario MunicioaI Beard:
AND WHEREAS The Corporation of the Town at Caledon r-.as no intsntion at interfering with any
arrangements between either the MTRCA or Orangevil\e ana tI'leIr legal ccunsal;
BE IT RESOLVED THAT The Corlxr.Iticn of the Town of CaJedon ask the MTRCA to consider
whether it is in the public intarest for a pubrlC body then is supportive of OPA #114 and OPA #124
tc be I"9presanl8Ci by the same legal ccunsel as is repl'8Senting a public body ttlat is opposed to at
least some provisions of OPA '114, notwithstanding that there is no direct confl'tCt between the
respec1Ive posilicns at the two public bodIes.
-.
-
iii (b~
Mayor: W1J "-u
I Camec( I Lost I
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B463
-
C1ARDINER, ROBERTS Swte 3100. Scona 1'l0lZ0l Seven 400 Royal CentM
Bunsten and Soliotors .w 1Gn~ S~ West SUite 300. 3300 Highway 7
Toronto. Cmada MSH 3Y2 Gty or Vaughan
Ontano UK -lM3
Couasel
Galrge C. lJtIIIriIIlri. Q.c. Telephone: (416) 865-<>600 Telephone: (905) 660-3333
FaCSImIle: (~16) ~6 Facsurnle: (905) ~
Please reply to our VaugbaD. Office
July 23, 1996 .
.--
James W. Dillane ~
The MetrOpOlitan Toronto and
Region CoDSCrVation Authority
5 Shoreham Drive
Downsview, Omario
M3N 154
Dear Mr. Dillane:
RE: Town of Caledon OPA 114
MTRCA and Town of Orangeville Ret:liners
At the Pre-Hearing Conference which took place on Thursday July 18, 1996 the question was
~ raised again of a potential conflict of imerest because Gardiner, Roberts is appearing in this
matter for both the Town of Or.mgeville ("Orangeville") and the Authority. In your leaer dated
June 28, 1996 you requested confumation that DO conflict of imerest would arise if Gardiner,
; Roberts were to act for both Or.mgeville and the Authority in the hearing before the Ontario
, Municipal Board of OP A 114 and OPA 124 of the Town of Caledon and the Official Plan of the
!
Region of Peel (the "ROP"). At the moment Ms. Matera is representing the Town of
Or.mgeville with regard to OPA 114 and the ROP and the Authority with regard to all three
matters. We are awaiting the Board's final decision regarding the scope of consolidation of
these three mattcI'S.
ORANGEVlLLE BRIEF
For some time and from time to time Gardiner, Roberts has been representing Orangeville in
connection with the potential annexation of lands in Caledon. south and south east of
, Orangeville. In the early stages, discussions between Orangeville and Caledon were quite
amicable in that Caledon recognized Orangeville's needs, particularly the aligmnem of a ring
road to join Highways 9 and 10 south of the Town. Confumation of this is embodied in the
existing Caledon Official Plan which contains a Special Study Area designation for these lands
and contemplates joint planning smdies. OP A 114 deletes this designation and associated
policies.
Ms. Matera's brief is to protect the designation of a special policy area. The brief from
Orangeville does not involve a contest over environmental issues, appropriate land use
Monrreoll Affiliate: B~lolnger Sauve
B464 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
GARDINER, ROBERTS ,
designations or tbe aligmnem of the ring road. The Enviromnemal Assessment for the road bas
already been done.
In any event, the 1ands involved arc completely within the jurisdiction of tbe Credit Valley
Con.scrvaIion Authority.
MTRCA BRIEF
--
A1> we understand our instructions. Ms. Matera is to represcm the Authority at the hearing of
these matters as may be necessary from time to time. The Authority, as a circulating agency
for OPA 114, OPA 124 and tbe ROP, bas already comml'!Uted on these cfoMtmf!lltS and supportS
them in their present f:)III1 to tbe extem of tbe Authority's geographical jurisdiction.
The Authority's concerns lie with some of tbe individual development proposals which have
come forward from landowners. It is clear that these individual matters cannot extend to and
include the Special Snuiy Area defined in tbe current Caledon Official Plan and which
Orangeville seclcs to preserve in some fOIII1.
ONGOING AUTHORITY POUCIES WITH REGARD TO ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
I have reviewed with Ms. Matera the issues which arise in tbe conteXt of tbe Orangcville brief
and it is clear that those issues arc not and cannot be inconsistent in any way with the broad
environmemal policies of tbe Authority. The 1ands in question. whether in Caledon or ultimately
in Orangeville are outside the Authority's jurisdiction. The broad policies oftbe CVCA pertain
in these circumstances and will have to be respected by Orangeville. I point out that historically
it was required that tbe proposed road aligmnent would be established through the environmental
assessment process and that has now been done. Any further approvals which may be required
will be applied for in separate proceedings.
The restricted position taken by Orangeville in this hearing deals only with a potential
geographic annexation. It is Orangeville's position that it is advisable, as a matter of notice to
the public, to indicate in OPA 114 and the ROP the fact that at some point in time some lands
in Caledon south of Orangeville that arc designated ~RuraI~ may be required to accommodate
Orangeville's growth. There will be no environmental or land use issues raised of any kind in
this hearing by OrangeviI1e as it does not seek any land use designations at this hearing.
, ,
(
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B465
RES #B140/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT
IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO 1995-
1999
Cliff Lumsden Park, Lake Ontario Waterfront, City of Etobicoke
Award of contract for the hauling and disposal of contaminated soil
from Authority owned land located adjacent to Cliff Lumsden Park, City
of Etobicoke. Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #38/96,
September 27, 1996, Tender ES96-30
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT Contract #ES96-30 for the hauling and disposal of contaminated soil from the former
Etobicoke Hydro property at Cliff Lumsden Park be awarded to Laidlaw Waste Systems
Limited at the unit price of $34.00 per tonne, up to a total cost of $44,200, plus G.S.T.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Meeting #5/96, held on June 23, 1995, the Authority approved the purchase of 0.182
acres of vacant land from The Hydro-Electric Commission of the City of Etobicoke. The
land is located on the east side of Seventh Street, south of Lakeshore Drive (Cliff Lumsden
Park) in the City of Etobicoke. As part of the purchase agreement, the Authority agreed to
carry out any and all site remediation required in accordance with the Ministry of
Environment and Energy (MOEE) Guidelines.
Tenders have been invited for the hauling and disposal of up to 1300 tonnes of non
hazardous soil from the above mentioned land to either Keele Valley Sanitary Landfill site or
an alternate licensed disposal facility. Upon completion of the excavation, the site will be
backfilled, graded and seeded.
Laidlaw Waste Systems Limited submitted the lowest unit price for hauling and disposal of
the soil to an alternate licensed disposal facility. Therefore it is recommended that Contract
ES96-30 be awarded to Laidlaw Waste Systems Limited at the unit price of $34.00 per
tonne for a total cost of up to $44,200, plus G.S.T.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available for this work under Account No. 004-12-502.
Report prepared by:
David Hatton (416) 392-9725
B466 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
RES #B141/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Drywall Work - Buildings 1, 3, and 5
This report advises on the results of the drywall work quotations
received by the Authority as part of the Tender Opening Sub-Committee
Meeting held on September 20, 1996.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #37/96 dated September 20, 1996, on
drywall work quotations be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be advised to award the contract for the supply and installation
of drywall in Buildings 1, 3, and 5 at the Don Valley Brick Works site to Presot Painting and
Drywall Ltd. for the amount of $65,990.00 (excluding GST). . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This contract is for the installation of drywall in Buildings 1, 3, and 5 at the Don Valley Brick
Works site. Contractors experienced in this type of work were pre-qualified by the project
construction manager and staff. The results of the tender process are:
Cnntrar.tnr Bids
Pre sot Painting and Drywall Ltd. $65,990.00
Trans Ontario Ceiling and Wall Systems Ltd. $67,890.00
Four Seasons Drywall Systems Ltd. $70,787.00
Downsview Drywall Contracting $78,600.00
RATIONALE
The quotations were reviewed in detail and were correct and complete except for those
received from Trans Ontario Ceiling and Wall Systems Ltd. and Four Seasons Drywall
Systems Ltd.. Both contractors failed to include the necessary bid bond security and were
therefore disqualified.
Based on this review, staff recommend that the lowest quotation received be accepted.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick
Works Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and the
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
For information contact:
Nick Saccone (ext. 301) or Adele Freeman (ext. 238)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B467
RES #B142/96 - THE PROJECT FOR FLOOD PROTECTION, DIXIE/DUNDAS
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, LITTLE ETOBICOKE CREEK-
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL
Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #44/96, September 27, 1996
Award of Contract ES96-28 Applewood Park Pedestrian Bridge,
Dixie/Dundas Flood Control Project, City of Mississauga.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT Tender ES96-28 Applewood Park Pedestrian Bridge, City of Mississauga, be awarded
to Somerville Construction, for the amount of $58,181.25. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The construction of the Dixie/Dundas Flood Control Channel requires that the existing
pedestrian bridge in Applewood Park be reconstructed. The City of Mississauga will fund
the cost of the new bridge, and under agreement, has asked the Authority to coordinate its
construction.
Tenders were requested for the supply and installation of the pedestrian bridge in
Applewood Park. The results of the tenders process are:
Gateman Milloy Inc. $86,978.31
King City Group $67,945.00
Somerville Construction $58,181.25
All the tenders were arithmetically correct and complete.
RATIONALE
The consultant for this project, Hans Sustronk and Associates, reviewed the bids and
checked references on the low bidder. The consultant is satisfied that the low bidder, is
qualified and capable of undertaking the contract work and meeting the completion date.
They recommend the award of this contract to Somerville Construction at an estimated cost
of $58,181.25 including G.S.T. for this work. The consultants estimate for this work was
$67,500.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work will be available in account no. 113-25. Funding for the overall project
has been provided by The Regional Municipality of Peel and the Province of Ontario,
approved at Authority Meeting #12/94, January 27, 1995.
For information contact:
Jim Tucker, Ext. 247
8468 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
RES #B143/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Site Services - Post-Tender Addendum. This report advises on the
results of the site services post-tender addendum quotations received by
the Authority.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT staff be advised to award the contract for the installation of site services to Buildings
1, 3, 4, 5, 6/7, 8 and 13 at the Don Valley Brick Works site to Bess-Con Construction for
the amount of $65,182.00 (excluding GST). .......................... CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Meeting #7/96, held on August 30, 1996, the Authority approved Resolution #A 145/96:
"THA T Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report #24/96, dated August 2, 1996, on
site services be received;
AND FURTHER THA T staff be directed to award the contract for the site services
associated with the Don Valley Brick Works site restoration project to Crown Drain in
the amount of $122,500 (excluding GST), with a contingency of $ 73, 160 for
unknown subsurface conditions resulting in a Total Contract Cost of $195,660". . .
" " .. .. " " .. .. , .. " , " .. .. .. " " " " " " " " , " " " " " .. " " " " " " " " " .. " " " " " " " " " " " CARRIED
Subsequent to receiving Authority approval to award this contract, staff, in consultation
with the project team, decided to reduce the overall scope of the building stabilization works
for budgetary reasons. It was decided that the funds available for the building stabilization
component of the project would be directed to restore andlor stabilize only Buildings 1, 3,
4, 5, 6/7, 8, and 13. Buildings 9 to 12 and 14 to 16 would be secured and retained in
anticipation of future restoration efforts.
Given the reduction in overall site service work, a post-tender addendum was issued to the
two lowest bidders, Crown Drain and Bess-Con Construction. The quotations for the
revised scope of work are: Bess-Con Construction $65,182.00, and Crown Drain
$88,200.00.
RATIONALE
Budget projections, based on actual quotations and estimated costs, indicated that the
available funding would not allow the Authority to restore all of the retained buildings on
site in this phase of the work. Therefore, staff concluded that the restoration efforts would
be most effective if funds were directed to a smaller group of buildings. This decision
eliminated the requirement to provide water and sewer service to the eastern portion of the
site in this phase of the work.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B469
The post-tender addendum quotations were reviewed in detail and found to be correct and
complete. Therefore, staff recommend that this contract be awarded to Bess-Con
Construction for the amount of $65,182 (excluding GST).
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick
Works Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and the
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
The project consultants (architects and structural engineers) have advised Authority staff
that a short postponement in the stabilization work to buildings 9 to 12 and 14 to 16 would
not negate future efforts to stabilize and restore these buildings. It is estimated that
approximately $1,500,000. is required to stabilize these buildings. To this end, Authority
staff are presently investigating future private and public funding opportunities.
For information contact:
Nick Saccone, Ext. 301 or Adele Freeman, Ext. 238
RES #B144/96 - HIGHLAND CREEK FLOODLlNE MAPPING
Utilizing updated digital flood plain mapping for the Highland Creek,
develop new hydraulic models and plot revised regional floodlines.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT the firm of Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd. be awarded the contract to develop a
new hydraulic model and plot the regional floodlines on the Highland Creek at a cost not to
exceed $ 43,250.00 + GST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority originally undertook flood plain and floodline mapping along the Highland
Creek in 1958/59 with this information being updated in 1979. At that time, 1976
photography was used to generate the mapping along the Highland Creek system. The
1979 mapping created a total of 20 map sheets along the watercourse at a scale of 1 :2000.
Since 1979 substantive changes have occurred within the area previously mapped to the
point where sections of the mapping no longer effectively reflect ground conditions. The
1979 mapping product was analog and as such revisions to the base contour information
can only be revised through a complete map sheet update. Since 1979, digital mapping
data at a scale of 1 :500 has been developed by the City of Scarborough which covers the
complete municipality. The Authority has arranged to work with the City of Scarborough by
utilizing its digital data base to generate updated flood plain mapping along the Highland
Creek. This new mapping is consistent with the City's data base and being digital can be
B470 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
updated on a map by map basis using information normally generated through the current
development and construction design process. Staff of the Authority have developed
. guidelines to be used by the proponent of any works within the valley system to allow for
the effective and efficient update of the revised digital mapping products. The design
requirements for these revisions will form part of both the City's standards and of the
Authority's permit process. Therefore, the flexibility of this new digital data will allow for a
more efficient and cost effective updating procedure which should extend the life of this
new floodline mapping as well as maintain the City's data base.
To facilitate the development of new hydraulic models along the Highland Creek and
generate new floodlines, three firms have been approached for proposals and quotes:
Greenland Engineering $ 57,750. + GST
Marshall Macklin Monaghan $ 43,250. + GST
M.M. Dillon Ltd. $ 44,500. + GST
RATIONALE
The floodline and flood plain mapping information allows the Authority to manage hazards
within the valley and stream systems of the Highland Creek as outlined within the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Up to date information is
necessary to facilitate these tasks.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The selected Consultant will generate new hydraulic models including measured bridge and
culvert components and develop and plot updated flood lines on reproducible map sheets.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds to allow for the generation of updated flood lines along the Highland Creek have been
allocated within the Mapping Extension Program of the Authority's budget, Account no.
112-25.
FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS
The use of digital information co-ordinated with the municipal data base will allow for easier
future maintenance of the data and allow for continued co-operation and information
sharing between the Authority and the Municipality.
For information contact:
Don Haley, Ext.226
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B471
RES #B145/96 - -LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT
1995-1999 IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN
TORONTO.
Colonel Samuel Smith Park, City of Etobicoke
To retain the services of consultants to complete the final design for the
remaining shoreline protection.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT the consulting firm of W.F. Baird & Associates be retained to complete the final
design for the remaining shoreline protection at Colonel Samuel Smith Park, City of
Etobicoke at a total upset cost of $27,096.98 including GST. . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The final major development component for the park is the construction of the final
shoreline armouring along the outer exposed shoreline (Hard point 4), including the harbour
entrance breakwater (Figure 1). Prior to armouring, it is necessary to undertake coastal
modelling and analysis of the existing shoreline to ensure that the alignment, configuration
and underwater slopes are appropriate to allow the armouring to proceed. The final
shoreline treatments will be designed to incorporate some aquatic habitat components while
maintaining the required level of protection for the park.
Four coastal engineering consultants have been invited to submit proposals to complete the
study in accordance to the terms of reference. These firms are:
Atria Engineering Inc.
W.F. Baird & Associates
Johnson, Sustronk Weinstein & Associates
Shoreplan Engineering Ltd.
RA TIONALE
Invitations were sent to four consulting firms to complete the coastal engineering analysis
and design for final shoreline protection. The proposals received are as follows;
Total Cost
Onc!. GST)
Johnson Sustronk Weinstein & Associates $21,400
Atria Engineering Inc. $28,526
W . F. Baird & Associates Option 1 $22,721
W.F. Baird & Associates Option 2 $27,097
B472 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
Shoreplan Engineering Ltd. submitted a letter acknowledging our invitation but declined to
submit a proposal because they were unable to meet the study schedule.
The proposals were evaluated based on the following criteria:
- staff commitments, expertise and qualifications on coastal engineering
numerical modeling;
- methodology and proposed coastal engineering software to be used for the
analysis and design;
- previous experience on coastal design incorporating habitat components;
- quality of the proposal;
- study schedule; and
- cost.
The proposal from Atria Engineering did not include the final design drawings within their
total cost and also included a revised study schedule which did not meet the schedule
recommended in the Terms of Reference. W.F. Baird & Associates provided two cost
proposals. The lower cost proposal met all the requirements of the Terms of Reference and
their methodology and proposal content was deemed to be the best. Their second proposal
at a total cost of $27,097 proposed to complete the wave analysis using a new state-of -
the art coastal engineering software model that has become widely used internationally and
is recognized as being the best available for predicting coastal hydrodynamics. The Terms
of Reference specified that state-of-the-art modeling would be a benefit for this assignment.
The study team as outlined in the proposal from Johnson, Sustronk Weinstein do not have
the coastal engineering computer modeling expertise compared to the staff with the other
firms. Their proposal was also weak in that it relies on "shareware" coastal computer
models that require expertise in their applications.
The purpose of this study is to assess the stability of the shoreline and underwater slopes
prior to the Authority undertaking a major expenditure on final shoreline protection works.
W.F. Baird & Associates are fully capable of carrying out the required analysis using state-of
the-art coastal dynamic modeling and staff are satisfied that they are the most capable of
providing the optimum protection design.
It is recommended that the higher cost proposal from W.F. Baird & Associates be accepted
based on their proposal being evaluated as the best and their methodology of using the
best available coastal engineering software package. This methodology was also deemed to
be the most reliable and dependable in a recent study for the Department of Fisheries and
Oceans which conducted a comprehensive comparison of available coastal software.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B473
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The budget for this study has been set at $25,000.
Funds are available for this study in Account 204-03.
This study will be carried out under the "Lake Ontario Waterfront Regeneration Project
1995-1999", approved at Authority Meeting #1/94, March 4,1994.
For information contact:
Nigel Cowey, Ext. 244
B474 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
~ :r:~ 0
. !::=O::: Z
.
. ~<( -
.
. a j UlQ..Z 0:::
... . .- =>
. c;:Jf-<(
. 0
. ~z---!
. Q) 2
. ~oQ..
. I-
-------.. & :::l 0:::
t CJl UlO:::W <(
-;-- z LL ---l LL f-
wO:::-
w ~ :z:wUl ---!
I-
in a.. Of- <(
~ ---l<( Z
~ 8:?: LL
-~ r'1
f' E
->. J
"E -g
~V; o 0
.)l on
.!j
-.:<
0 Ol,-
:>0
Eo..
0_
Vle
0 '<;j-
- '-
Ol-
e '-
..Q~ ........
00 C
u~
0
0...
\J
~
0
:r:
~ 0
~
u
>-= 0>
vi
..J
~
0
'C
0
-..~ ........
I .......--... C
0
Q)
~
0
---l
.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 8475
RES #8146/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the
Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be
constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a
Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or
on such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river,
creek, stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(7.9.1 - 7.9.18) which are listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
RES #8147/96
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application
7.9.19, Motor Home Vacations, which is listed below. ................... CARRIED
B476 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
(7 ~ 1) Thp. T nwn nf r.~Ip.dnn
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on Part Lot 8,
Concession 7, (Bel Air Ravine), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as
located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area and to construct a storm sewer and storm
outfall in order to rectify an existing erosion site.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Totten Sims Hubicki Assoc. Ltd.; Project 42-18407; Drawing 1,
dated February 19; Drawings 2, 3 and 4, dated June 1995; Drawing 5, dated August
1995; Drawing 6, dated May 1995.
(2) Letter of Undertaking from Mr. C. Campbell, Assistant Director, Public Works
Department, Town of Caledon; dated February 16, 1996.
(3) Detail of Temporary Sediment Pond; prepared by Totten Sims Hubicki Ltd.; dated
February 22, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpm:~I:
To construct a 1400 mm diameter storm sewer in the Bel Air Ravine south of Ellwood Drive
and a new 600 mm storm sewer outfall at the Humber River in order to eliminate an existing
erosion problem in the Bel Air ravine.
r.nntrnl nf Flnnding'
The proposed sewer is designed to convey 25 year storm runoff from the 71 hectare
drainage area of the Bel Air Ravine system. It will connect to an existing 2100 mm storm
sewer at Hemlock Street. The proposed outfall is required to complete the construction of
an adjacent storm sewer on John Street. Except for the outfall, the works are not located
within the flood plain of the Humber River.
Pnlllltinn.
The proposed works will rectify an existing sedimentation problem with the existing storm
sewer. Sediment controls will be utilized at the storm sewer outfall to the Humber River.
r.nm:p.rv~tinn nf L~nd.
The Town has undertaken to conduct a site investigation with Authority staff once the
contractor has been chosen. This investigation will identify specific trees requiring removal
and clearly indicate the working area. The consultant will prepare a landscape rehabilitation
plan. The Town has indicated that Authority staff may be retained to undertake the
rehabilitation plantings.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B477
Pnlicy Gllirtp.linp.~'
The works are in conformance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program, Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing. The proposal represents the alternative
selected through the Class Environmental Assessment process undertaken for this project.
CFN: 27455 Appl. # 187/95/CAL
For Information contact: Richard Lloyd, Ext. 281
Date: 1996.09.23.
(7 ~ ?) Pp.tp.r Fnrrp.~t
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 179, Block 1, Registered Plan BOL-7, (133
Albert Street - Bolton), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located
on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a new 4.9 metre by 7.3 metre detached garage/storage shed
within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site, Elevations and Structural Detail Drawings; submitted by the applicant; received
August 13, 1996. (Total Plans4).
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnrn~al:
The proposal consists of replacing an existing detached garage with a new 4.9 metre by 7.3
metre garage/storage shed. No fill placement is proposed as part of the construction. The
entire property is located within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River and the
Bolton Special Policy Area (SPA).
Cnntrnl nf Flnnrting'
The proposed structure will be dry-passive flood proofed to above the 1 in 500 year storm
flood elevation which is the minimum level of flood proofing as prescribed within the Bolton
SPA document.
B478 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
Pnlllltinn'
No sedimentation will result from the proposed construction work.
Cnn~ervatinn nf Lanri'
Disturbed areas around the new building will be re-sodded following completion of the
works.
Pnlicy Gllirielines'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification
within Established Communities/Highly Urbanized Areas of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program and the Bolton SPA (Town of Caledon Official Plan
Amendment 57).
CFN: 28144 Application #: 173/96/CAL
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.09.23.
(7 ~ ~) Pp.tp.r Swain
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 24, Concession 4, (16720 Humber Station Road),
in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to reconstruct an existing on-stream dam structure and construct a new
bottom-draw outlet on a tributary of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan and Typical Cross-Section; prepared by Moto Engineering Co. Inc.;
Drawings 1 and 2; dated September 14, 1996; received September 17, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al:
To reconstruct an existing on-stream dam structure and construct a new bottom-draw low
flow outlet in order to re-establish an existing on-stream pond. The original berm has
partially failed and the water has drained out of the pond.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnriing'
The pond berm and outlet have been designed to convey flows up to the Regional Storm
level through a combination of a bottom-draw low flow outlet and spillway.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B479
Pnlhltinn'
As the existing pond has been drawn due to the failure of the existing berm, the works can
be constructed and stabilized in dry conditions. The bottom draw pipe will be installed
manually and act as a low flow bypass.
Cnm:p.rv;ttinn nf L;tnd'
The new pond berm has been designed and certified by a geotechnical engineer to ensure
stability and prevent future failures which may affect the adjacent road (Humber Station
Road). Installation of the bottom draw will result in a reduction of downstream water
temperatures.
Pnlir.y Guidp.linp.~'
The works are in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program, Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing. Staff have advised the applicant that
the works are considered as emergency works pursuant to this section as the failed berm
has the potential to damage the existing road.
CFN: 28140 Application #: 165/96/CAL
For information contact: Richard Lloyd, ext. 281
Date: 1996.09.23.
(7 ~ 4) M;trkl;tnn Wnnd~ Cnuntry Club
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on Part Lot 6,
Concession 5, (245 Markland Road), in the City of Mississauga/Etobicoke, Etobicoke
Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake regrading works and erosion control works in the flood plain
and regulated area of Etobicoke Creek and replace an existing culvert crossing of a tributary
of the Etobicoke Creek.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Document entitled -Markland Woods Country Club - Renovation Works 1996: by
Robert Heaslip and Associates dated received by MTRCA September 5, 1996. (Total
Documents 1).
(2) Site Plan; prepared by Robert Heaslip and Associates, undated; Plan of Existing
Vegetation Areas prepared by Robert Heaslip and Associates, dated August 22,
1996. (Total Documents 2).
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
B480 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
Proposal:
To undertake regrading works in the fill regulated area and flood plain of the Etobicoke
Creek in order to modify the existing golf course; undertake erosion protection works and to
replace an existing course bridge crossing of a tributary of Etobicoke Creek. The specifics
of the works are as follows:
Hole # 1 relocate fairway bunker and redesign greenside bunkers
Hole #2 re-shape greenside bunker
Hole #4 construct new fairway bunker
Hole #6 reshape fairway bunker
Hole #7 reshape existing and construct new greenside bunker
Hole #8 reconstruct existing tee decks
relocate existing cart path
reconstruct existing cart path crossing over tributary
remove one greenside bunker and re-shape others
Hole #9 re-shape greenside bunkers
relocate cart path
Hole #10 reconstruct fairway bunker
re-install erosion protection adjacent to Etobicoke Creek (50m)
Hole #11 regrade behind existing armourstone wall
Hole #12 reconstruct existing fairway bunker
Hole #17 relocate/re-shape greenside bunker
. install erosion protection adjacent to Etobicoke Creek mOm)
Control of Flooding'
As the proposed regrading activities are extensive throughout the course, the applicant has
provided a revised hydraulic analysis detailing the impact of the proposed changes on the
existing flood plain.
Staff are satisfied that this analysis concludes that the proposed grade changes do not
significantly impact existing flood elevations through the reach of the Etobicoke Creek.
Polhltion'
The two areas of erosion protection are located back from the low-flow channel such that
no in-water works are required. The balance of the works will not affect the channel.
Siltation fencing is identified on the drawings in areas where construction activity will occur
adjacent to the watercourse.
Consp.rvation of Land'
No works will occur on the existing valley wall of the Etobicoke Creek.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B481
Opportunities to undertake significant riparian improvements on the course are limited due
to the restrictions in the course area. In response to staff concerns with regard to
improvements to existing riparian habitat, the course has provided details of a re-
naturalization program in which areas of reduced maintenance and pesticide use have been
identified. In addition, the club has indicated its intent to undertake a master planning
exercise to integrate natural corridor linkages with the existing course. The Authority has
been invited to participate in this Master Planning process.
Polir.y Gllinp.linp.~.
The proposed works are in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program, Section 4.2.2 E) - Existing Resource-Based Uses.
CFN: 27392 Application #: 170/95/ETOB
For information contact: Richard Lloyd, ext. 281
Date: 1996.09.23.
(7 ~ 5) Cp.ntrp.fllnn (North York) Corpor::ltion
To construct in a flood plain on Part Blocks B, C and D, Registered Plan 3991, (2200
Jane Street), in the City of North York, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to alter the east exterior wall of the existing commercial building by installing
additional door and window openings, as well as constructing a new pillar-supported canopy
over the adjacent shopping mall sidewalk, within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Black
Creek.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Scoler Lee and Architects; Project 9539; Drawing A-1, dated
June 1996; received September 4, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Propo~al:
The proposal consists of remodelling the east exterior wall of the existing commercial
building. Construction will consist of installing additional doors and windows, as well as a
new canopy over this portion of the shopping mall (Sheridan Mall) sidewalk, supported by
architectural pillars. The entire site is located within the Regional Storm flood plain of the
Black Creek; no fill placement is proposed as part of the works.
Control of Flooning.
The site is subject to minimum flood depths (ie. centimetres), with a low velocity of flow
(less than 1.0 metre per second) under Regional Storm conditions. The minor nature of the
proposed construction will not impact the existing hydraulic characteristics of the flood
plain. In addition, the bottom sills of the new openings into the building will be above the
Regional Storm flood elevation.
B482 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
Pnllutinn'
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works.
Pnlir.y Gui('If~linp-~'
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28165 Application #: 185/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja (Ext. 342)
Date: 1996.09.23.
(7 ~ 6) Kathlp-p-n Mnnnp-y
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 1,
Registered Plan M-453, (3 Brookfield Road - Hogg's Hollow), in the City of North
York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material for minor lot grading and construct a new single family
dwelling within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the West Don
River.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan; prepared by Classic Design Associates Inc.; Sheet 1 dated August 20,
1996; received August 27, 1996. (Total Plans 1).
(2) Floor Plan and Elevation Drawings; submitted by Don Calvert of Petroff Partnership
Architects, agent for the owner; dated August 21, 1996; received August 27,1996.
(Total Plans 5)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al:
The proposal consists of demolishing the existing house and construction of a new single
family dwelling. Minor fill placement (:I: 0.5 metres above grade) will be required in order to
achieve positive drainage away from the new foundation walls. The property is fill
regulated and located within the Regional Storm flood plain of the West Don River, as well
as the Hogg's Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA).
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The new dwelling will be dry flood proofed to above the Regional Storm flood elevation.
Pnllutinn'
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works. The construction site is 40
metres away from the watercourse.
Cnn~p-rvatinn nf Lann'
All filled and disturbed areas will be re-sodded following construction.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 8483
Pnlir.y Gllirtp.linp.~.
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.2.1 - Development and
Redevelopment/Intensification within Established Communities/Highly Urbanized Area - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program and the Hogg's Hollow
SPA (City of North York Official Plan Amendment 375).
CFN: 28164 Application #: 183/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.09.20.
(7 9 7) Mp.trn Tnrnntn Wnrk~ Dp.pl'lrtmp.nt
To place fill within a regulated area on Rosedale Valley Road leading to Bayview
Avenue, in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to install flow control equipment (sluice gate) at an existing storm chamber
and conduct associated electrical work within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River
Watershed.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Mid-Toronto Interceptor Sewer Plans; prepared by Metro Toronto Works Engineering
Division; Sheets 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6; as received on September 6, 1996. (Total Sheets
5)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnrn~l'Il :
The applicant proposes to expand an existing underground kiosk connected to the storm
sewer and install flow control equipment and conduct electrical work. The works are
adjacent to the Rosedale Valley Road which connects Yonge Street to Bayview Avenue.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnrting.
The works are not within the flood plain. There will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Pnlllltinn'
The works will be conducted through a combination of open cut and tunnelling and will
have no impact on the control of pollution. In addition the site is more than 500 metres
from the Don River.
Cnn~p.rvl'ltinn nf ll'lnrt.
The works will not impact the conservation of land as the site is adjacent to the developed
Rosedale Valley Road. There will not be removal of the existing vegetation.
B484 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
Pnlicy C::llirlp-Iinp-~'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28169 Application #: 187/96/TOR
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.09.23.
(7 ~ A) Myrnn pp-~talllky
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12, Concession 6, (447 Carlton
Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill for the purpose of constructing a driveway/road access and site
preparation to service a 4 lot residential plan of subdivision.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 2001 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Grading Plan - Block 84 - Unionville; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather limited;
Project 93049; Drawing 301; dated May 1996; received July 9, 1996.
(2) Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan; prepared by MBTW Community Planning and
Urban Design and Landscape Architecture; Project MYP 001; Drawing TP-1; dated
revised May 30, 1996; received July 9, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnrn~al:
The subject property formed part of a draft plan of subdivision approved in 1983 (19T-
82014). As part of the subdivision review process a top-of-bank of the Rouge River valley
was established which coincided with the MTRCA fill regulation line at that time. The
subject property was set aside in a separate block in the plan of subdivision and contained
the old homestead buildings (two dwellings and a barn). In 1985 the MTRCA carried out
additional flood plain mapping which identified the block as being subject to shallow
flooding due to a back water from a downstream culvert under a CNR line. In 1985 the
MTRCA received a fill permit application from Mr. Pestaluky requesting permission to raise
the site above the Regional Storm flood elevation. As the site was not fill regulated and the
depths of flooding were shallow (approx. .2 metres) staff 3pproved a grading plan which
allowed the site to be raised above the Regional Storm flood elevation. In 1986 the
MTRCA's revised fill regulation was approved which now shows the block within the fill
regulated area. The proponent filled approximately 75% of the site in 1985 raising it above
the Regional Storm flood elevation. The area where the filling was not completed is around
an existing dwelling which the proponent intends to demolish in the near future. The
proponent proposes to construct a driveway access road to service the subject site.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B485
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding.
Only a small part of the site is now located in the flood plain. Depths of flooding are
shallow and will not impact the control of flooding.
Pnlllltinn.
Silt control fencing will be erected around the perimeter of the site.
Cnn~p.rvatinn nf Land.
Additional plantings will be provided along the Rouge Corridor edge as part of the final
landscaping plan.
Pnlir:y Gllidp.linp.~.
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 3967 Application #: 198/96/MARK
For information contact: Barry Knox, ext. 268
Date: 1996.09.27.
(7 ~ ~) Maxr:nn Dp.vp.lnpmp.nt~ Limited
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 27 and 28, Registered Plan 329, (Woodview and
Pinegrove Road), in the Town of Pickering, Petticoat Creek Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to pipe a remnant section of watercourse to accommodate a subdivision
development on the subject site.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Sanitary Drainage, Grading Details and Sediment Control Plans; prepared by Maxcon
Developments Ltd.; Project 96-E-38; Drawings 96-E-38.102, 96-E-38.103 and 96-E-
301; as received on August 22, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al:
The applicant proposes to pipe a remnant section of intermittent watercourse to
accommodate a subdivision development. The works are in compliance with a master
servicing scheme, approved for this area, that envisioned the lands to be serviced with
sewers, and the elimination of this watercourse. The watercourse is currently piped
downstream of the property for more than 1 kilometre to its confluence with the Petticoat
Creek.
8486 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
There will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Pnllutinn'
There will be no impact on the control of pollution.
Cnm:p.rvatinn nf Land'
The watercourse has previously been channelized through this section and currently has no
riparian vegetation.
Pnli~y Guidp.linp.~'
The works are in compliance with Section 3.3 - Policies and Procedures for Identifing
Watercourses and Alterations - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program which notes that enclosures may be permitted if urban drainage design
requirements demonstrate the need.
CFN: 28157 Application #: 178/96/PICK
For information contact: Russel White, ext. 306
Date: 1996.09.23.
(7 ~ 10) Oak Gardp.n E~tatp.~ In~
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 18, Concession 1, (Brock Road and Highway
2), in the Town of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on property owned
by Sheridan Chev Olds Cadillac Ltd.
The purpose is to construct a temporary sales trailer within the Duffins Creek Special Policy
Area.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan Detail; prepared by Avenue Homes; Drawing 1; received September 26,
1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnrn~al:
The applicant proposes to construct a temporary sales centre at the corner of Brock Road
and Highway 2 within the Special Policy Area. The structure consists of a 60 foot by 12
foot trailer with a small 12 foot by 32 foot addition. The structure will be in-place until July
17, 1997. The site will promote the sale of new residences being constructed on an off-site
location.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 8487
Pnlllltinn.
The works will not involve any regrading and as a result will not impact the control of
pollution.
Cnn~p-rvatinn nf I and.
There will be no impact on the conservation of land as this site is more than 50 metres from
the watercourse and adjacent to developed lands within the Special Policy Area.
Pnlir.y Gllidp-linp-~.
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.1 - Development within Special Policy Areas
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28195 Application #: 197/96/PICK
For information contact: Russel White, Ext. 306
Date: 1996.09.26.
(7 ~ 11) Lnretta Appllglip-~i
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 19, Concession 3, (9796 Dufferin Street, Maple),
in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to alter a waterway by the partial filling of an existing on-stream pond along
a tributary of the East Don River.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998.
(1) Letter dated October 8, 1996 from Joseph Zinni, Property Manager, clo Mrs. Loretta
Appugliesi.
(2) Revised drawing by applicant titled site plan pond, dated received by MTRCA
October 8, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al:
The proposal consists of reducing the surface area of an existing on-stream pond along a
tributary of the East Don River flowing through the subject property. The proposed works
involve filling-in approximately three metres on the east side of the existing pond, for its
entire length of 37 metres. The entire pond edge is lined with rock filled gabion baskets;
the applicant wishes to re-instate the baskets along the new East bank of the pond. The
site is presently not fill regulated; however, fill lines are proposed to encircle the
watercourse at this location, in accordance with the Authority's on-going Fill Regulation
Extension Program.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding.
The hydraulic characteristics of the flood plain will not be affected by the reduction of the
pond area.
B488 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
Pnllutinn'
The owner has agreed to install a bottom draw outlet from the pond in order to reduce
downstream thermal pollution in the watercourse; reducing the surface area of the pond will
also assist in lowering streamflow temperature. The pond level will be lowered so that the
proposed works can occur under dewatered conditions.
Cnn~Arv::ltinn nf L::Inrt.
Staff have approached the applicant and are discussing the possibility of retaining a natural
(ie. tapered) bank along the east side of the pond rather than re-installing the gabion basket
edge treatment. The re-introduction of native vegetation within the riparian zone is also
being discussed with the owner.
Pnlir.y GuirtAlinA~.
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28141 Application #:166/96/VAUG
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.09.24.
(7 ~ 1?) AIAx.I D::Ivirt~nn
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 126, Registered Plan 5099, (203 Burbank
Drive), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to place fill material in conjunction with the construction of a new retaining
wall within the Fill Regulated Area of the Newtonbrook Creek.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998.
(1) Letter of Understanding from Curt Cunningham (Agent), signed by Gillian Davidson
(Owner), dated October 7, 1996; revised and received October 9, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnrn~::I1 :
The proposal consists of placing fill behind a new retaining wall to be constructed of used
rubber tires. The existing wooden retaining wall has deteriorated and collapsed, posing a
threat to the existing dwelling which is approximately five metres from the top-of-bank of
the Newtonbrook Creek valley wall. The proposed retaining wall will be constructed along
the entire backyard area and will be coincident with the valley top-of-bank. The rear yard
area of the property is located within a Fill Regulated Area.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 8489
cnntrnl nf Flnnrting.
The construction site is situated above the Regional Storm flood plain of the Newtonbrook
Creek.
Pnlh Jtinn'
A sedimentation control fence will be placed along the top-of-bank in the rear yard of the
property.
cnn~p.rv::ltinn nf L::Inrt.
Technical staff is presently reviewing the design of the proposed used rubber tire retaining
wall. The finished elevation of the wall will result in grades being raised in the backyard by
a maximum of 0.3 metres (:t) above existing ground elevations. Native ground vegetation
and shrubs will be planted to enhance wildlife habitat and provide additional stability at the
base of the new retaining wall.
Pnlir.y Gllirtp.linp.~.
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancinary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28024 Application #: 109/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja, Ext. 342
Date: 1996.09.24.
(7 ~ 1~) Fnrir.n Fr::ln~p.~r.hi
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 46, Registered Plan 2388, (97
Riverside Drive), in the City of North York, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material for lot grading purposes in conjunction with the
construction of a new two-storey single family dwelling, within the Fill Regulated Area of
the Humber River.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 October 10, 1998.
(1 ) Site Plan prepared by The Plan Company; received September 16, 1996. (Total Plans
1)
(2) Drainage Plan prepared by I. L. Guidolin and Associates Consulting Engineers;
received September 16, 1996. (Total Plans 1).
(3) Letter Report prepared by I. L. Guidolin and Associates Consulting Engineers; dated
and received October 9, 1996. (Total Documents 1; Total Plans 1).
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
B490 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
Prnrn~::II:
The proposal consists of placing fill for grading purposes around a new two-storey single
family dwelling, which will replace an existing single storey bungalow on the property. The
grading is required to provide frost protection and positive drainage away from the new
foundation walls. The entire property is fill regulated and only a small portion of the front
yard, immediately adjacent to Riverside Drive, is situated within the Regional Storm flood
plain of the Humber River.
cnntrnl nf Flnnrting.
No part of the proposed construction or grading work will occur within the Regional Storm
flood plain.
Pnlllltinn.
Sedimentation is not expected as a result of the proposed works; the building site is located
80 metres away from the river channel.
cnn~p.rv::ltinn nf L::Inrt.
The property is situated on the valley floor for the most part, with the exception of the
southern-most portion of the rear yard which gently slopes upward, eventually meeting the
toe of the valley wall. All construction will occur 18 metres away (ie. north) from the toe of
slope. Fill placement to level a depression in the backyard will occur within 3 metres of the
valley toe. This area of the Humber River valley corridor has been extensively developed,
with manicured lawns and fences along the entire reach of the slope. The existing
residential properties up slope and adjacent to the site (ie. on the valley floor) will not be
impacted by the proposed development of the subject site; written confirmation from a
geotechnical engineer confirming this matter will be received prior to the meeting.
Pnlir.y Gllirtp.linp.~.
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28182 Application #: 190/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.09.25.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B491
(7 ~ , 4) AVAnllA I-InmA~
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 12, Concession 5, (Fonthill Channel, Unionville), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to undertake watercourse modifications using natural channel design
principles to address issues of conveyance of flows and streambank erosion.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998.
(1 ) Red-line Revision Channel Plan, Profile, Cross-sections and Details, Fonthill Channel;
prepared by Masongsong-Atkari Engineering Ltd.; Project 96396; Drawings C1, C3,
C4, C5, and C7; received October 9, 1996.
(2) Letter of Undertaking from Tony Masongsong of Masongsong Atkari Engineering
Ltd., regarding Red-line Revisions and Planting Plans; dated and received October
10, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnrn~::II:
As part of the conditions of development of a residential subdivision, Avenue Homes is
proposing to undertake modifications to the Fonthill Channel between Fonthill Blvd. and
Fred Varley Drive. Accumulated sediment will be cleaned out of the channel, and the
channel configuration will be modified, using natural channel design principles, to contain
the 100 year storm flows and address channel erosion. This area is located within the
Unionville Special Policy Area. The reach between Rycroft Dr. and Fonthill Blvd. and
downstream from Fred Varley Drive is also to be modified but is the subject of a separate
permit application by the Town of Markham.
Control of Floodina:
The watercourse is a tributary of the Bruce's Creek (Rouge River). The regulatory storm for
this watercourse is the 100 year storm event. The Regional Storm event floods this area as
backwater from Bruce's Creek. In compliance with the policies for the Special Policy
Designation set out in OPA 100, the lands adjacent to the channel are proposed to be
developed for residential use by Avenue Homes. The new channel will convey the 100 year
storm.
Pnlh Jtinn'
The watercourse is to be temporarily piped during construction. Starting from the upstream
end, machinery will work from over top of the watercourse, pumping flow around the work
area and constructing the new channel as they move downstream. Authority staff support
this approach given the property constraints, and believe that sediment entering the
watercourse will be minimised.
B492 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
cnn~p.rv::ltinn nf L::Inrt.
The existing watercourse carries a substantial amount of base flow. The watercourse has
been channeljsed in the past and through time has widened and become incised. The
stream banks are slumping.
The low flow channel will be lowered and reduced in width and height. A meandering
pattern and pool riffle sequence will be incorporated into the low flow channel and hardened
in place with the use of river run stone. The flood plain floor will be widened ,covered with
riprap and topped with topsoil and wildflower seed mix. In addition, the slopes of the
channel will be planted with native shrubs and trees. The result will be an improved aquatic
and terrestrial habitat, improved geomorphic processes that will reduce erosive energy, and
stabilisation of the stream banks and bed to prevent future erosion.
Pnlir.y Gllirtp.linp.~'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Prograr:1 as it relates to Section 3.3 Policies and Procedures for Identifying Watercourses
and Alterations.
CFN: 28148 Application #:171/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.09.30.
(7 ~ 15) Tnwn nf M::Irkh::lm
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 12, Concession 5, (Fonthill Channel, Unionville), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by
Town of Markham (easement agreement).
The purpose is to undertake watercourse modifications using natural channel design
principles to address issues of conveyance of flows and streambank erosion.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998.
(1 ) Red-line Revision Channel Plan, Profile, Cross-sections and Details, Fonthill Channel;
prepared by Masongsong-Atkari Engineering Ltd.; Project 96396; Drawings C1, C3,
C4, C5, and C7; received October 9, 1996.
(2) Letter of Undertaking from Tony Masongsong of Masongsong Atkari Engineering
Ltd., regarding Red-line Revisions and Planting Plans; dated and received October
10, 1996.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B493
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnrn~::II:
The Town of Markham is proposing to undertake maintenance of the Fonthill Channel
between Rycroft Drive and Fonthill Boulevard and downstream from Fred Varley Drive.
Accumulated sediment will be cleaned out of the channel, and the channel configuration will
be modified using natural channel design principles. This area is located within the
Unionville Special Policy Area. The reach between Rycroft and Fonthill is privately owned
and under a maintenance agreement with the Town of Markham. The reach downstream of
Fred Varley Dr. is owned by the Town of Markham. The works are designed to address
issues of flooding and erosion along the channel that have been raised by residential
property owners. The reach between Fonthill Blvd. and Fred Varley Drive is also to be
modified but is the subject of a separate permit application by Avenue Homes.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnrting'
A permit was approved (C-96075) at Executive Committee Meeting #3/96 for the
replacement of culverts along this watercourse under Fred Varley Drive and Fonthill Blvd. A
future proposal is anticipated for the Rycroft Dr. culvert. These culverts provide an enlarged
opening which will relieve much of the frequent flooding concern along this reach. The
channel modifications provide for the transition between the watercourse and the new
culverts but do not otherwise directly affect the control of flooding.
Pnlllltinn'
Because of the width of the channel easement, and the immediate proximity of houses to
the watercourse, between Rycroft Dr. and Fonthill Blvd., the watercourse is to be
temporarily piped during construction. Starting from the upstream end, machinery will work
from over top of the watercourse, pumping flow around the work area and constructing the
new channel as they move downstream. For the reach downstream of Fred Varley Drive,
the watercourse will be dammed and pumped around the work site. Authority staff support
this approach given the property constraints, and believe that sediment entering the
watercourse will be minimised.
cnn~p.rv::ltinn nf L::Inrt.
The existing watercourse carries a substantial amount of base flow. The watercourse has
been channelised in the past and through time has widened and become incised. The
stream banks are slumping and the channel has meandered off the rear property line of the
residential lots.
B494 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
The low flow channel will be lowered and reduced in width and height. A meandering
pattern and pool riffle sequence will be incorporated into the low flow channel and hardened
in place with the use of river run stone. Some armourstone will be used adjacent to the
culverts and outside of the low flow channel to provide slope stability to the channel. The
flood plain floor will be covered with riprap and topped with topsoil and wildflower seed
mix. In addition, the slopes of the channel will be planted with native shrubs and trees.
The result will be an improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, improved geomorphic
processes that will reduce erosive energy, and stabilisation of the stream banks and bed to
prevent future erosion.
Pnlir.y GllirtAlinA~'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 3.3 Policies and Procedures for Identifying Watercourses
and Alterations.
CFN: 28149 Application #: 172/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext 304)
Date: 1996.09.30.
(7 ~ 1 fi) MAtrll~ DAvAlnpmAnt Inr.
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 16, Concession 4, (northeast corner of 16th
Avenue and Woodbine Avenue, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as
located on property owned by Town of Markham.
The purpose is to construct a storm outfall.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998.
(1 ) Cachet Centre, Site Grading, and Site Servicing Plans; prepared by Fred Schaeffer
and Assoc. Ltd.; Project 95-E-1763; Drawings 1 and 2, received Sept. 19, 1996.
(2) Cachet Centre, Storm Outfall Details; prepared by Fred Schaeffer and Assoc. Ltd.;
Project 95-E-1763; Drawing 6, received Sept. 26, 1996.
(3) Letter of Undertaking from Peter Kanitsch of MBTW Landscape Architects; regarding
Planting Plans; dated and received October 10, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al:
A storm outfall for a commercial development has been constructed. The Town of
Markham has stopped work on the development until all required permits are in place.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B495
The outfall outlets directly into Applewood Creek immediately upstream of an existing on-
line storm water pond. The design and location of the outfall is in compliance with the
storm water management requirements for the site and the Buttonville Master Drainage
Plan.
cnntrnl nf Flnnrting'
The works will not affect the control of flooding
Pnlllltinn'
It is unclear as to the sediment control techniques used during construction. Sediment
controls are now in place.
cnn~p.rv::ltinn nf I ::Inrt.
Authority staff are now reviewing a landscaping plan for the site adjacent to Applewood
Creek. Applewood Creek has been channelised through this reach; however, there is an
opportunity to naturalise the top of the channel banks.
Pnlir.y Gllirtp.linp.~'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.3 (Infrastructure and Servicing).
CFN: 28158 Application #: 186/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, ext. 304
Date: 1996.09.26.
(7 ~ , 7)City nf Sr.::Irhnrnllgh
To alter a watercourse on Lot 21, Concession D, (9 Burnview Crescent), in the City
of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake streambank protection works on the main branch of the
Highland Creek..
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998.
(1 ) Erosion - Behind House #9 Burnview Cres. Plan; prepared by City of Scarborough;
dated received July 22, 1996. (Total Plans 1).
(2) Bank Erosion Protection at Rear of #9 Burnview Cr.; prepared by City of
Scarborough; dated received August 26, 1996. (Total Plans 1).
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
B496 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
Prnpn~::II:
The City of Scarborough is proposing to undertake stream bank erosion protection works
along the outside bend of the watercourse. The works will involve placing 1 to 2 tonne
field stones along 20 metres of the watercourse.
At this location, the existing gabion mat erosion protection works have failed, threatening
existing parkland vegetation. Technical staff has reviewed the proposal and is satisfied that
it is in keeping with our valley and stream corridor management objectives.
cnntrnl nf Flnnrting'
The above proposal will not involve any grade changes or fill placement within the flood
plain, and will not impact the control of flooding.
Pnlllltinn'
The field stones will be placed along the stream bank by a machine which will access the
site from the park. No in-stream works are proposed and no machinery will enter the
watercourse during construction.
cnn~Arv::ltinn nf L::Inrt.
The City of Scarborough proposes to place top soil and seed after construction. As this is
not a formal use park area Authority staff are discussing a program with City staff to
undertake a more aggressive riparian planting scheme.
Pnlir.y GllirtAlinAS'
The above proposal complies with Section 4.3(D) - Infrastructure and Servicing (Remedial
Erosion Works) - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 25582 Application #: 155/96/SCAR
For information contact: Gemma Connelly, ext. 202
Date: 1996.09.26.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B497
(7 ~ , R) Bnrnllgh nf E::I~t Ynrk
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 5, Concession 2, (O'Connor Drive and the
Don River), in the Borough of East York, Don river Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to rebuild an abandoned water main which crosses the Taylor-Massey Creek
adjacent to O'Connor Drive within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998.
(1 ) Temporary Crossing Sketch Drawing No.1; Silt Fence Detail Drawing No.9;
Sediment Trap Dewatering Detail Drawing No. D-10; and Valley Well Restoration Plan
Drawing No. D-8R; prepared by Chisholm, Fleming and Associates, as received on
September 27, 1996.
(2) Rehabilitation Watermain, O'Connor Drive from Woodbine Avenue to Glenwood
Crescent; prepared by Chisholm, Fleming and Associates; Contract 95-300;, as
received on August 27, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~::I1
The purpose is to rehabilitate 430 metres of an existing abandoned watermain which
crosses the Taylor Massey Creek adjacent to the O'Connor Drive Bridge. In order to
rehabilitate the pipe section, two connections to the existing watermain, one drain valve
chamber and a creek under crossing of the Taylor Massey Creek is required. In order to
facilitate the undercrossing, a temporary crossing will be required to provide machinery
access to the east bank of the watercourse. Augering will be required at the banks of the
watercourse. The works are being proposed within an existing easement.
cnntrnl nf Flnnding
There will be no impact on the control of flooding as the site will be returned to original
condition.
Pnlllltinn
Sediment fencing will be erected between the proposed works and the watercourse and will
remain in place for the duration of the works. In addition, material from the dewatering of
the auger pits will be filtered prior to discharge to a vegetated area away from the
watercourse.
cnn~p.rv::ltinn nf L::Ind
Plantings will be conducted at all disturbed areas along the easement.
B498 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
Pnlir.y Gllidp.linp.~
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28166 Application: 184/96/EY
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.09.30.
(7 ~ , ~) Mntnr I-Inmp. V::lr.::Itinn~ (c::In::ld::l)
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 3, Concession 7 Albion, (12563 Highway
50 - Bolton), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to alter a waterway by partially filling a widened portion of a tributary of the
Humber River.
The permit will be issued from October 11, 1996 to October 10, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Letter of Undertaking from John Sammut, President, Motor Home Vacations
(Canada); dated and received October 8, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~::I1 :
The proposal consists of partially filling a widened portion of a tributary of the Humber
River. The widened stream area has the appearance of an on-line pond; however, there is
no control structure (ie. dam) at the outlet. The watercourse flows through the ponded area
on this part of the subject lands. The abutting tablelands are being developed as a
recreational vehicle rental business. The intent of the owners is to fill-in a "bulge" at the
southwest corner of the pond (eliminating approximately one quarter of the ponded area) in
order to create an aesthetically pleasing sitting/picnic Staff has confirmed that the functions
of the stream corridor will not be adversely impacted by the reduction in pond area.
The subject watercourse drains an upstream area of less than 125 hectares. The site is not
presently fill regulated; however, fill lines are proposed to encircle the stream, in accordance
with the Authority's on-going Fill Regulation Extension Program.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The hydraulic characteristics of the flood plain will not be affected by the proposed works.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11, 1996 B499
Pnlhltinn'
Primary on-site treatment of storm water runoff is presently being designed by the
consultant for this 2 hectare site. The remaining pond area will act as a natural secondary
treatment cell for storm drainage leaving the site. During construction, an impermeable
coffer dam (ie. Aquadam, plastic-wrapped stone berm or jersey barriers, etc.) will be
installed to isolate the portion of pond to be filled. Silt fencing will be placed adjacent to
the remaining pond area and watercourse channel to impede the overland migration of
sediment.
cnn~p.rv::ltinn nf I ::Ind'
The pond is heavily vegetated with emergent growth (ie. cattails and bulrushes) and some
woody vegetation (ie. trees and shrubs) on the opposite side of the proposed area to be
filled. The owners have agreed to re-vegetate the disturbed riparian zone with native plant
material. The enhancement of the riparian zone with woody vegetation will improve the
natural function of the stream corridor through this reach and will add to the vista from the
customer sitting/picnic area adjacent to the remaining pond.
Pnlir.y GlIidp.linp.~'
The proposal is in compliance with Section 3.3 - Policies and Procedures For Identifying
Watercourses and Alterations - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program. The retention of well-vegetated and naturally-functioning stream corridors is also
in accordance with the goals and objectives of the Humber Watershed strategy.
CFN: 28199 Application #: 199/96/CAL
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.09.30.
RES #B148/96 - THE BEDFORD GROVE - SCATTERING OF ASHES
To respond to the Morley Bedford Funeral Home letter of September 30,
1996 requesting that the Authority reconsider its decision not to permit
the scattering of ashes on conservation lands.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the above item be referred to the next Authority
Meeting #9/96, to be held October 25,1996. .............. .'. . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
B500 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/96, OCTOBER 11 , 1996
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:55 a.m., October 11, 1996.
Rir.h::lrd O'BriAn .J cr::lig M::IthAr
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
/pl
~
, the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #10/96 Page B501
November 8, 1 996
The Executive Committee met in the South Theatre, in the Visitor's Centre at Black Creek Pioneer
Village, on Friday, November 8, 1996. The Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to order at
10:05 a.m.
PRESENT
Michael Di Biase ........................................................ Member
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Joan King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard O'Brien. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair, Authority
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard Whitehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
REGRETS
Lois Griffin ............................................................ Member
Lois Hancey ................................................. Vice Chair, Authority
RES #8149/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #9/96, held October 11, 1996, be approved. . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
Mr. Brian Harrison declared a conflict of interest with respect to Res. #A 164/96 -
Partnership Memorandum for Municipal Plan Review, as his son owns land in the area. Mr.
Harrison did not participate in discussion nor vote on this matter.
B502 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "0/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
MOTION TO DEFER
RES #8150/96 - MEMBERSHIP - THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF
GREATER TORONTO
Appointment of members - The Conservation Foundation of Greater
Toronto appoints members for a three year term.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the above item be deferred to the next Authority meeting;
AND FURTHER THAT Foundation staff prepare a report providing further background
information on Mr. Navin Chandaria.. ............................... CARRIED
RES #8151/96 - SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY-OWNED LANDS
East side of Islington Avenue, South of Rutherford Road, City of
Vaughan, CFN #27612C
Regional Municipality of York
1. Sale to Islington Woods Development Ltd. ( Formerly known as
Blackplate Investments Inc.)
2. Sale to St. Francis Society of Ontario, (Formerly Father Claudio
Moser, In Trust) Franciscan Brothers
Status report on progress toward for the completion of land sales in the
vicinity of Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan,
Regional Municipality of York.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report dated October 30,
1996, relating to.the status of processing the sale of surplus Authority-owned tablelands,
situate on the east side of Islington Avenue, south of Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan,
The Regional 'Municipality of York, be received. ...................... ~. CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8503
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting '6\96, held on July 26, 1996, under Resolution 'A 133\96, Members
of the Authority approved the sale of the subject lands. A status report as to the progress
made as of September 27, 1996, was presented to the Members of the Authority at the
Authority Meeting held on October 25, 1996.
ANALYSIS
Since the report of September 27, 1996, progress continues to be made on these complex
matters. A brief summary of the two transactions and the current status is as follows:
Executive Summary of Transactions
1. Islington Woods Developments Ltd. (Formerly Blackplate Investments Inc.)
Area to be purchased : 10.271 acres
. an additional 0.793 acres will be conveyed to the purchaser or the City of Vaughan
to facilitate an acce'ss road being constructed by the purchaser, from Islington
Avenue between the lands being sold to St. Francis Society of Ontario
Purchase price: $1,848,780.00
Conditions and approvals:
(a) An extension to November 12, 1996, has been granted to allow the purchaser the
opportunity of carrying out the initial due diligence review. Upon waiving of this
condition, the $135,000 initial deposit will become non-refundable.
(b) The appropriate approval authorities are in the process of dealing with the following
approvals:
(i) Land Severance - the Committee of Adjustment for the City of Vaughan
approved the required severance for this transaction on October 24, 1996,
subject to conditions which we believe are satisfactory.
(ii) Official Plan Amendment - Members of the Council of the City of Vaughan at
a meeting held on October 21, 1996, refused the request for an official plan
amendment to facilitate the proposed residential use requested by the
proponent. The Members of Council directed staff to proceed with a study of
the appropriate land uses that the City would be prepared to support at this
location.
Council of the City of Vaughan, at a meeting held on October 28, 1996
adopted the action taken at the Meeting held on October 21, and directed
staff to ensure that the study is finalized and recommendations are before
Council by no later than November 28, 1996.
B504 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
(c) Approval of the Minister of Natural Resources - The legal survey of property was
registered on October 29, 1996, and the submission was forwarded to the Ministry
of Natural Resources October 30, 1996.
(d) Terms of Agreement - The Agreement as originally prepared, provided for an
extended period of closing which would provide for sufficient time for the official
plan amendment, rezoning and draft plan approval to be dealt with through the
Ontario Municipal Board process. The proponent is currently reviewing his position
with regard to the strategy to be utilized if he decides to pursue this purchase and
further information will be provided to the Members as soon as it is at hand.
Archaeological : The archaeological investigation is currently being carried out at the cost
of the purchaser and is now in the final stages of completion.
In spite of earlier optimism obtained during preliminary meetings with residents, it should be
noted that there was considerable opposition from Council, of the City of Vaughan, to the
proposed residential use at this location for the sale to Islington Woods Developments Ltd.
(formerly Blackplate Investments Inc.). The proponent at the time the offer was made had
anticipated a long process to obtain required approvals and had provided appropriate time in
the Agreement of Purchase and Sale to accommodate Ontario Municipal Board hearings.
The purchaser is currently in the process of considering his options in this matter.
2. St. Francis Society of Ontario (Formerly Father Caudia Moser, In Trust)
Area to be purchased: 10.846 acres
Purchase price: $1,518,440.00
Initial deposit credited to the Authority - $75,000.00
Conditions and approvals:
(a) An extension to November 12, 1996, has been granted to allow the purchaser to
obtain a rezoning on a small portion of the lands being sold to facilitate institutional
uses. The closing of the transaction may now need to be subject to the rezoning of
this small parcel.
(b) The appropriate approval authorities are in the process of dealing with the following
approvals:
(i) Land Severance - the severance of the two parcels proposed to be included in
the sale were approved by the Committee of Adjustment for the City of
Vaughan at a meeting held on October 24, 1996, subject to conditions which
we believe are satisfactory to the purchaser.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B505
(ii) Re-zoning - Council of The City of Vaughan at meetings held on October 21
and October 28, 1996, have approved the required rezoning to facilitate the
institutional use at this location.
(c) Approval of the Minister of Natural Resources - The legal survey was completed on
October 29, 1996, and the submission was forwarded to the Ministry of Natural
Resources on October 30, 1996.
Archaeological : The Archaeological investigation has been completed at the cost of the
purchaser and staff advise that there are no archaeological concerns
involved with respect to use of the property for institutional purposes.
While it appears that the required approvals will be at hand to facilitate the sale to St.
Francis Society of Ontario, (formerly Father Moser, In Trust), it should be noted that there
was considerable concern regarding the proposed development at the public meeting held
on October 21, 1996. The proponent and staff are still optimistic that this transaction can
close during late 1996 or early 1997 and everything possible will be done to facilitate the
completion of this transaction. The proponent has also expressed a willingness to make
reasonable changes during the site plan process to attempt to deal with as many of the
residents' concerns as possible.
Staff will report further to the Members of the Executive Committee and the Authority as
further information regarding the severances, rezoning, Official Plan amendments and site
plan approvals are at hand.
A plan illustrating the parcels being sold and the general area is appended for the
information of the Members.
Report prepared by:
Don J. Prince, extension 221
B506 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
- I - J
"-
,- . , -
-\
-
i
" -. \
~'
, I
~~. I _
"~
".
"
.-. ..
-
,
\
-
Parcels' A' and '8' proposed to be conveyed to St. Francis Society of Ontario
(Formerly Father Claudio Moser, In Trust)
Parcel 'C' proposed to be conveyed to Islington Woods Developments Ltd,
(Formerly 81aekplate Investments Inc.)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B507
Rr=S MB162196 - REQUEST FOR CONVEYANCE OF AUTHORlTY-OWNED LAND
AND BUILDINGS AT THE GUILD INN TO THE MUNIQPALlTY OF
METROPOLITAN TORONTO
Status report on the request from Metropolitan Toronto for conveyance
of Authority owned lands and buildings at the Guild Inn.CFN 22648D
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the report on the
request of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for conveyance of the Guild Inn lands
and buildings dated October 30th, 1996, be received;
THAT the proposed conveyance be deferred pending further response from The Municip8lity
of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND FURTHER THAT The Mayor of the City of Scarborough be so advised. . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
late in 1995, the Executive Committee approved Resolution #E183/95:
THA T the potential disposal of certain lands and buildings at the Guild Inn, in the City
of Scarborough, to the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, be referred to Authority
staff for review, in accordance with established Authority policies;
AND FURTHER that a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a
future date, recommending further action.
The Authority"s policy requires that the area municipality and region where lands being
considered for disposal are located, be asked if they have any interest in the property.
Accordingly, staff wrote to the City of Scarborough on February 22, 1996, seeking
comments on the potential disposal of these lands. A response from the Mayor of
Scarborough concerning the property taxes was received by the Authority at its meeting of
May 28, 1996.
On July 12, 1996, the Executive Committee referred the matter to the Metropolitan Toronto
Commissioner of Parks and Culture for comment.
B50S EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER S, 1996
RATIONALE
Staff has had a number of informal discussions with the Metro Toronto Commissioner of
Parks and Culture. In correspondence dated October 11 th, 1996, the Commissioner
advises that Metro Toronto will soon be issuing a Request For Proposals for the future
operation of the Guild Inn. He has asked that the matter of the transfer of title be deferred
at least until the outcome of the proposal call is known. Further action on the transfer of
title may not be necessary.
For information contact:
Jim Dillane, Ext. 220
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B509
RES #8163/96 - THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF CALEDON
Request for a Permanent Easement for a portion of a storm water
management facility on the east side of Highway #10, north of Mayfield
Road, Town of Caledon.CFN 28208
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The MetropoIitM Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from The Corpogtion of the
Town of Caledon to provide a parcel of Authority land for construction of a portion of a
storm water management facility to assist Valleywood Gardens with their development, in
the vicinity of Highway #10 and Mayfield Road, Town of Caledon;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to cooperate with The Corporation of the Town of Caledon and V.Meywood
Gardens in this instance;
THAT. permanent easement containing 0.262 hectares, more or less, (0.647 acres) be
granted to The Corporation of the Town of Caledon for a portion of a storm water
management facility and appurtenances to facilitate development, said land being Part of
the west half of Lot 20, Concession 1, East of Hurontario Street, Town of CaIedon, Regional
Municipality of Peel and designated as Part 1 on a Plan of Survey prepared by Anton Kikas
Limited under their Job No. 96-06-04;
THAT the Authority request the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources to grant an
easement across the subject land on the following terms and conditions:
(a) The easement price is to be a conveyance to the Authority in fee simple of 0.985
acres, more or less, of flood plain and valley land, being of Part of the east half of
Lot 20, Concession 1, East of Hurontario Street, Town of Caledon, Regional
Municipality of Peel and designated as Part 1 on a Plan 43R-21684, together with
the sum of $5,000., which is to be paid by Valleywood Gardens to the Authority,
plus all legal, survey and other costs incurred to complete the transaction;
(b) Prior to commencing construction, a full archaeological review is to be prepared to
the satisfaction of the Authority's archaeological staff with provision being made for
Valley wood Gardens to fund such a study and carry out any resulting work required;
(c) All disturbed areas are to be restored to the satisfaction of the Authority as soon as
possible after completion of construction;
(d) Sediment control measures in a manner satisfactory to the Authority .. to be
practised during construction;
continued...
B510 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "0/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
(e) The Corporation of the Town of Celedon is to be responsible for my ....... or
maintMance required in the future and for indemnifying the Authority from ..y Met
all claims arising from the construction;
(f) Any additional considerations as deemed appropriate by the Authority solicitor;
THAT said easement i. subject to the approval of the Minister of Natugl Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as ...-.ended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority official. .. authorized Met directed to Uke
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necM'ery
approval. and the execution of any documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The subject lands were acquired from 797820 Ontario Umited a member of the Valley wood
Gardens Companies on December 5, 1991 under the Etobicoke Creek Flood Plain Lands
component of the Land Acquisition Project. At the time of the acquistion, the Authority
granted to The Corporation of the Town of Caledon an easement for another storm water
management facility to service this development. Valleywood Gardens reserved, under the
original transaction, the right to construct an additional storm water management facility at
a mutually acceptable location.
The storm water management facility is partially being constructed on existing Authority
land and partially on additional lands now being acquired from Valleywood Gardens.
This storm water management facility is subject to an application for a permit under Ontario
Regulation 158. A report regarding this application is on this agenda.
A plan illustrating this location is attached.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the funding obtained from this easement be utilized for the purchase of
high priority Flood Plain, Valley, Lake Ontario Shoreline and Greenspace properties under the
Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1996 - 2000.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, extension 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8511
'=":"~J'--- .- ~-:-- -
~ - - , '. - ~- - -
-,-
'-
- '; ~~~ -~'-:::-;~- -C- - -: ~___ _,-:...~-
-'
. ~- - -
I' ,~--"..J -. ~---. ~
,~. .., -~-~-:::: . .--' ;-~Q.. ,
_ - ~ "A.ii-~--- ~""'. ~~, -...c...._...;z:.~ \ - ...
:--~-.;-' .. \~~~~...~-~~:
~\ .~.5~,~~::.~:i-~1~~~-:!~;~ ::~
'~
\, '
, '\ 0 , ~ _' 0- , .. .~... -, .
.. .' ----
i\ -.~ -' ,," .. - -=-.,=~:\ _ ~"":'-i~"; -- - --
J 1\ . ,'_ '- ....:.~,--- _- ,.... _
I\}.~ LA'N'Ds T~ ~~~U1RED \~i~: '?
~BY THE AUTHORITY --J~"
_-..... ~, ? -- I"~''''.'l<~\
.- .\ '. ") , !J;1j, -.- ...- --
......--:.-:'"-....~ ~/ ,/... -,- ,j --
~ ~ :........."... ~ /'. .c." ... I. /'
- ~ . ~-;-......."";:' '-)
~ "-:,~'- ~ :~-"~
. "'. .
",' '-",-/. ", , ' .
\. .... 4_~. \ '~:." ~~-:;: _____.....__-.
, - -
, ...-
PROPOSED STORM WATER'" ,
'. - . '. : MANAGEMENT FACIUTY
, . . '0 -
-
':~-:----':::'-~:-:- .:- ~ .
-
_.- - ,. ~~T'~ORITY' ~
.r-
LANDS ~
'- -
...... -
" ,
m )
, Z
~ ~--;-~--- Z ..
m
C
-< '.,/" ~ \
:D -
0
~)>
\..../"1 C ...
. ---
.~'
..
-
. .
, -
"" ~
'"
...
.
.
;
'-..
(
B512 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
RES .&164/96 - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT the Convnittee move into dosed session to discuss Greenspace Protection met
Aquisition Project 1996-2000 - Nancy Rossiter and Geoff Lund property. ...... CARRIED
RES .&166/96 - ARISE FROM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the Committee arise from closed session. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8513
RI;S .B166/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
Flood Plain Component, Humber River Watershed
Nancy Rossiter and Geoff Lund Property,CFN #11080
Offer to sell property, located on the west side of Weston Road, south
of Sheppard Avenue, in the City of North York.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Resolution #256 edoptM at Authority
Meeting 118/91, held on November 29, 1991, be rescinded and the following be approved;
THAT 18.472 acres, more or less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of vacant land, be
purchased from Nancy Rossiter and Geoff Lund, said land being Lot C, Registered Plan
3401, Parts of Lots 13 a. 14, Concessions V 8&. VI and part of road aIIowence between
Concession V 8&. VI, City of North York, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, fronting on
the west side of Weston Road, south of Sheppard Avenue;
THAT the purchase price be $250,000.00 inclusive of the vendors' legal costs Md
consulting fees;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrence, subject
to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute ell necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A 131/95, Authority Meeting #4/95, May 26, 1995, approving the project.
At Meeting #8/91, dated November 29, 1991, the Authority adopted Resolution #256 as
follows:
THA T 18.472 acres, more or less, be purchased from Grace Lund, said land being Lot C, Registered
Plan 340 1, Part of Lots 13 & 14,. Concessions V & VI and Part.of road allowance between Concession
V & VI, City of North York, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
THA T the purchase price be $82,500.00, plus Vendor's legal costs;
THA T the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject
to existing service easements;
BS14 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE '10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
THA T Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land
transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
THA T the Authority bring to the attention of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto the
request of the owners to, if possible, have this area known as Griffith Park;
AND FURTHER THA T the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
An executed Agreement was obtained in October 1991 based on an independent appraisal
dated September, 1991. Shortly after the Agreement was obtained staff were contacted by
members of the Lund family and their solicitor advising that their elderly parents had second
thoughts about selling the property and requesting that the pu.rchase arrangement be
terminated. The property has been in Mrs. Lund's family since it was patented by the
Crown in the 1820's.
After an extensive review, it was decided, that rather than enter into potential litigation,
which was threatened, and given the age of Grace Lund, it was best to release the owners
from the Agreement. In lieu of the release the Authority obtained the return of the deposit,
certain rights to re-activate the arrangement during a two year period if the owners agreed
and the right to an ongoing first right of refusal.
The ownership of the property was subsequently transferred to the daughter and son of
Grace Lund, Nancy Rossiter and Geoff G. Lund.
During the past year protracted negotiations have been conducted with Nancy Rossiter and
Geoff Lund and their solicitor Randolf I. Smith, Barrister and Solicitor. The owners have
utilized certain consultants to assist them in negotiations and the offer at hand is inclusive
of all of the owners consultant costs including legal fees.
The offer at hand is in accordance with the appraised value range of a independent
evaluation obtained by the Authority.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property is part of .the flood plain.of the.Humber River, is adjacent to other
Authority and publicly owned lands and falls within the Authority's approved master plan
for acquisition. It also has access to Weston Road. It is one of the largest privately owned
parcels of valley land remaining in the lower reach of the Humber River and the acquisition
is key to linking it to other publicly owned greenspace lands and to its long term protection.
It is also one of the parcels of land that the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto identified
as being very important to their open space needs and had requested the Authority to
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B515
attempt to acquire. At Meeting 110/95 the Authority adopted Resolution IA260/95 as
follows:
THA T the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be requested to confirm the funding
identified in the 1995-1999 Capital Works Programme under Metro Parks and Culture is
available on the following basis:
i) $500,000. in 1995 to assist in the purchase of Milne Hollow (Markovic Property);
ii) A maximum of $500,000. in 1996 to assist in the purchase of high priority
Mid and North Humber Valleylands;
THA T the Authority attempt to mstch up to $500,000. thst The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto is providing for the acquisition of the Mid and North Humber
Valleylsnds.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The lands will be turned over to the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto under our
management agreement.
FINANCIAl DEl AILS
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto has approved funding to a maximum of $500,000.
Expenditures involving the municipal share is subject to approval of the Commissioner of
Finance and the Deputy Commissioner of Parks and Culture. The Authority's share will be
raised through land sales. Funding for this acquisition will be charged to account 004-11-
502.
Report prepared by: Ron Dewell, Extension 245
For information contact: Ron Dewell, Extension 245
Don Prince, Extension 221
B516 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
.
I
-
..-
~;'-/2t}};:E;~~\~~
SUBJECT LANDS
~~...~
[ CITY OF NORTH ~~ ~~.. -..;:;n:' .u..~....:.
~,',...~ ~... ':J.~1!.,~\il.
YORK LANDS . ,:-:: ':....7.':'CI.:~.."'...j..~
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8517
RI;S .8167/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
Lake Ontario Waterfront, Pickering/Ajax Sector, Joyce Barber
Property,CFN 12048
Purchase of property municipally known as 3041 Lakeview Boulevard,
located in the Pickering Beach area of the Town of Ajax, Regional
Municipality of Durham.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.23 acres, more or ...., COMisting of
a rectangular shaped parcel of land, improved with a brick Md wood fr.-ne ......_ Md a
single c.- garage, be purchased from Joyce Barber, said land being the whole of Lot 24,
PI.-. 250, Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham, fronting on the south side of
Lakeview Boulevard, west of Shoal Point Road;
THAT the purchase price be $230,000.00 together with payment of vendor's legal costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject
to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers end Solicitors, be instructed to complete the tI'8nuction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidentel to the cluing for
land transfer tax, legal costs end disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A131/95, Authority Meeting #4/95, May 26, 1995 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with Andrew E. King of King and King, Barristers and
Solicitors, representative of the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
B518 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition along
the Lake Ontario shoreline, and is adjacent to Authority holdings. It represents one of the
last remaining residential properties in the Pickering Beach area of the Town of Ajax. The
Authority has acquired in excess of 50 properties in the Pickering Beach area and the
subject property is the last remaining parcel in a block of 9 properties.
Mrs. Barber contacted the Authority in early June of 1996 advising that she wanted to sell
her house and move to British Columbia in the fall.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The Town of Ajax has agreed to assume the cost of maintenance and taxes on this property
and Authority lands on the east and west sides of the property. This will result in an annual
savings to the Authority of approximately $2,300 for taxes and $3,900 for maintenance.
Ajax is considering the possibility of utilizing the dwelling situated on this property for park
purposes and may rent the dwelling in the interim.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004-12-502. The Town of Ajax will
fund 50% of the purchase price with legal costs. The remaining 50% of funding to be from
Land Sale Revenue.
Report prepared by:
Michael Fenning, ext. 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8519
I-
z
w
------ ~
w
w
~ I!I
.'
I
" >
l-
ii:
0
1'l ~ :t:
...
~
~
I
r
/
I I ;/
\ x'
</
en ... "'"l en
. c z ~ c
'z w Z
<~ll. j
-,wo
> ~ z,
_ '. !:: 0 ~ >
...
..'a:<... =
o '
:t:a:w' .' 0
... W:t: .--........... :t:
. ~ ~ ... --------- I-
Fl~~i: .. ~
~
... ~
I
-
Cl '!
~. ......~....
'.,
..
I
. /
o. HJYJ& !)"'et)":)td ...
-- --- os cr-',\
B520 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
RI;S M8158/9& - REQUEST FOR PERMANENT EASEMENTS, ROUGE RIVER
WATERSHED
The Consumers' Gas Company Ltd., CFN 28201
Receipt of a request from The Consumers' Gas Company Ltd. for
permanent easements across certain Authority owned lands on the east
and west sides of Meadowvale Road, north of Sheppard Avenue in the
City of Scarborough, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from The Consumers' Gas
Company Ltd. for permanent easements across Authority lands on the east and west sides
of Meadowvale Road, in the City of Scarborough to facilitate construction of a gas pipeline;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interest of the
Authority in furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities
Act to cCH>>perate with The Consumers' Gas Company Ltd. in this instance;
THAT permanent easements be granted to The Consumers' G.. Company Ltd. across
Authority owned lands containing 0.32 hectares, more or less (0.79 acres) being Parts of
Lots 3, 4 and 5, Concession 3 and Part of Road Allowance between Lots 2 Met 3,
Concession 3, City of Scarborough, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
THAT the Authority request approval of the Ministry of Natural Resources to grant the
easement across the subject land on the following terms and conditions;
(a) The easement price is to be the sum of $5,000.00;
(b) The Consumers' Gas Company Ltd. is to pay all Authority legal, appraisal, survey and
other costs incurred to complete the transaction;
(c) Prior to commencing construction, a full archaeological review is to be carried out to
the satisfaction of the Authority's archaeological staff;
(d) All construction is to be carried out in accordance with plans to be approved by the
Authority's technical staff and all permits required under Ontario Regulation 158 are
to be issued prior to commencing construction;
(f) The Consumer.' Gas Company Ltd. is to fully indemnify and absolve the Authority,
from any and all claims of any nature resulting in any way from the granting of the
easement or the carrying out of construction;
(g) Any edcIitional concerns as are deemed appropriate by the Authority's solicitors;
continued.. .
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B521
THAT the said easement be subject to approvel of the Minister of NatanI ReMurces in
accordMce with Section 21(2) of The Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 .. III'n8nded:
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized end directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto including the obmining of MY
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
A majority of the subject lands are encumbered by an easement in favour of the Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto for the access road and servicing for the Beare Road Landfill site.
The remainder is flood plain. The purpose of the easement is to reroute a portion of the gas
pipeline which is presently exposed at the Rouge River and to supply gas to a Metro tenant
at the Beare Road Landfill Site.
Negotiations involving staff of the Authority, and officials of The Consumers' Gas Company
Ltd. have been in progress for several months and all Authority technical requirements have
now been agreed to by The Consumers' Gas Company Ltd.
Prior to the Authority granting permission to enter to The Consumers' Gas Company Ltd. to
commence construction, The Consumers' Gas Company Ltd. will be required to assure the
Authority that satisfactory approvals have been obtained from the Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Culture Department, Works Department and the Metro Zoo.
The subject lands were acquired from Skigan Ltd. on December 28, 1962, from Glen-Rouge
Parks Umited on January 26, 1968, from M. V. Laidlaw on May 25, 1970, from The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto on November 4, 1983 and from The Corporation of the
City of Scarborough on September 20, 1984 under the Rouge River Flood Plain Lands
component of the Land Acquisition Project.
A plan illustrating this location is attached.
FINANCIAL
It is proposed that the funding obtained from this easement be utilized for the purchase of
other high priority Flood Plain, Valley, Lake Ontario Shoreline and Greenspace properties
under the Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1996 - 2000.
Report prepared by:
Michael Fenning, ext. 223
B522 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE '10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
\. -.
,,... ,-
~. _ _ .: FINCH A VENUE~.: .' ~ . __. . .
~.~ .;:--:~)t"'- --:" ./~.~-. ,.-'. 'W- -". . -:.~ ~:;;-.:. -=:'...=-'
". ",,"' JC=,.,.::. . /' .' ..c< "'~I ~.:.:;.-_ I ~ .' __'''-;:'...::.: ~
..--- I -.. - ~ -'-:ii'/ -. ,. .. - r- _...",,---
~~~:.;;'I! y 'G":"-';'~ ~....." /'1:1 ,.. ___~
..!I,;. .\ -='" , '~ f;::. - ../ ..;........ ./ .- . - .
,~I ~.. \~~ I ~---:'';''. wlV:".,., ,I - - ~#r
'1~'1,," ~ '. l/ \ d,?,,:'7'~..:. ' , . . - .J.iil _
;-'. - 'j!It:. .7 , I tl'J ":'~"""" ~.' .~.. _
"'....,...,f!' . .\'t . pJ,''';::r~ '.It....' . I' . ..
~p~ . ,. .../,,". -~r ,\ .. 1 _'__
.' .. ..~.r-:; '1l'-.,,.',J, ., \ jl _._
~ I ~"_" "':~i,.,.. '.-., __~_.
..... ~. - _. '_-'~ - ~-::~";"'l \~:' lr . - -'
...'-5" ..... -d r: ~ " .: "'. .(. ..3: . _ ___/
~:9;:......:..... ..:..-: -, ~f_"I;..~ ~ ::..,,_~ ., " -.-?--'!m . --- /./
~-~.;-:. 'V'-- -' .....LfI,.~'j". ''''t'' "/I> -- ,',p
~... :,.' ';~~',:~~~Ij.,__.... ::.'-: ::{r'.'C '- /
. ' 'il" ~".J.-_. 0 -
,j .-~tl.'t;j :. ~::-~::..~-:-~. .< _ /
_ IX lo "~.:.'. ..~.:......:----.... ~'/ < ,__---/-
'" ,......,. /~.,:: ~ -~." " . .' < ..-- ,
,..,~ ..' ~A .<-J?. - '.'> -
4.;.._,_:. .: \.... '.. ~~\..;i' :,... ....
~ '-~"\' 1. /I'>>. """"s-, J ,: ',~m "",,:..'"
- -:'~1'~..."~.,...-,, J" , "
f,:>\.;' '. ~.-. - "1 1-
.'u. ~' , ' ''\ ,_" --'/.' . .,..
,~;".J:/ . ~ .", .... . ,......:... r ..~ . '0 '
.,: ~...1 ,'P..-:-. _r: >,. ~. ,::.:-;.., r l;
~ /'. .I,~-;';:--' J .'" ':":
> "') ;;Ar' ~', "'~'" .
,<l;\O,..,lh'i ;'. '
..:: .;::.:..\,"*>'" t o;:;-..J, _, ,-
,.'- <'''''' (' METRO ZOO"-' . /.. \
:Ji)';.: /"':'11~ '~../~. ..".~~.. . , =-
..?~~t-. -"'v .~~.',..... ...
'. ""',,... f, ;; __'_.'; "
:.' ~. I ~ --;:;_. '. . ~
~~~/"'-=-=:. -.k ...., :. .~ . '-
:~fif;~~~~~:.\~:\,. .' i ~~ :,: '~;;-" '
~'~~~': .',
~?;7-:.~.'1"':~;'~ ~./ /
I. -~ - - . * .. ..,....::.J - ,
'1 / ~-:~. '1 j' . . '- .-.:~
~_../ -.' \ '/1
~_::::-:.:.=-~-~. < :~--
-, -
---
. -
- j,.~::r~'~~:~' '-1 -- ..
'. I,.
.- I 1./'" _: i ~
'. _"- L.~~ .'-;'~. ..... ' ,
.:- ~ I, '.. _ . . f,-
'--. 4 . r. . I '. _. .
,... .' I I' ! _ ..,.....;....
'. .... ,.. .... . I '-1"~' --r-
~- .-'. . . ,- ~/. ._-~
/"" , 0" , '_ "Y': -;- .' ~ .
-' ... .. . _ - --r. ....:./. ..,
=-.__ :.: _ ._ - /...-:c ..- . .-.i~.:....
-
, . . ;~' ~. - -~~ ~'.:.:~ -'(":~~:'
, .., , -:' .-/.~...
.. "/' ~ . '.'\:
. -", .~',~~ .._/11:"""~f.'
. , ".- -__/ .......-~l\
~ \_--- ../_._" t
I I AUTHORITY LANDS -: .' .~: '-' ::.. jJ...' ~ :r~
..... ...:;;.- :r L
- /----.~
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8523
RI;S MR169/9& - FRENCHMAN'S BAY - WEST ROUGE CANOE CLUB
To extend the agreement with the West Rouge Canoe Club on a
temporary basis from November 1, 1996 to October 31, 1997 for the
existing location on the west spit of Frenchman's Bay.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the NqlIIeSt to
extend the temporary licence agreement with the West Rouge Canoe Club for a paddling
f8ciIity on Fren,hman'. Bay for the period from November 1, 1996 to October 31, 1997 be
approved:
THAT the Council of the Town of Pickering be requested to concur with the extension to
the temporary lease agreement:
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority official. be authorized end directed to take
whatever action i. required in connection with the establishment of the West Rouge Canoe
Club paddling facility, including the development and execution of appropriate documents.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Meeting II 10/95, the Authority adopted Rp.~ #A?5~/~5:
"THA T subject to compliance with Authority requirements for facility
improvement and maintenance, the request to extend the temporary licence
agreement with the West Rouge Canoe Club for a paddling facility on
Frenchman's Bay for the period from November " 1994 to October 31,
1995, be approved;
THA T the licence agreement be amended to include provision of a second trailer
subject to the negotiation of satisfactory arrangements with MTRCA staff;
THAT the Council of the Town of Pickering be requested to concur with the
extension to the temporary lease agreement;
AND FURTHER THA T the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and
directed to take whatever action is required in connection with the
establishment of ' the ,West Rouge Canoe Club -paddling facility, including the
development and execution of appropriate documents. "
B524 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
The Town of Pickering Council concurred with the lease extension to October 31, 1996 and
direction to issue a building permit at its November 6, 1995 meeting by adopting the
following resolution:
"That the request of the West rouge Canoe Club to extend for the period
November " 1995, to October " 1996, its lease agreement with the
Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority respecting certain
lands on the west spit of Frenchman's Bay for certain purposes associated
with the Club's paddling activities on Frenchman's bay, including the storage,
within a temporary trailer or trailers, of canoes and kayaks associated
therewith, is hereby supported by the Council of the Corporation of the Town
of Pickering, on condition that a building permit be obtained from the Town's
Building Department for the existing trailer and any additional trailer to be
located on the site."
The West Rouge Canoe Club has operated since April 23, 1994. at this location, as outlined
on the attached figure, in accordance with the agreement conditions. For the period of the
agreement, no objections from the residents and users of the Frenchman's Bay West Park
were received. The West Rouge Canoe Club, by letter dated October 21, 1996, has
requested an extension to this temporary agreement to October 31, 1997.
RATIONALE
The paddling facility is consistent with the environmentally-friendly recreation activities
which are suitable for the Bay and with the current park operations. This proved to be the
case for the operating seasons 1994, 1995 and 1996 with no objections from the residents
and users of the park.
Discussions witn the Town of Pickering Planning Department indicate support to extend the
agreement for a further temporary period based on the results of 1994, 1995 and 1996,
operation of the paddling facility. At a recent meeting of the Frenchman's Bay Watch
Advisory Committee, extension to the West Rouge Canoe Club lease was supported. The
West Rouge Canoe Club is a participant on the Advisory Committee. Recent discussions
with The Town of Pickering Director of Planning indicate support for the extension on a one
year basis with the Town's Approval being processed November, 1996.
Any long term agreement would have to be consistent with the Frenchman"s Bay West Park
Plan.
The proposal also has the concurrence of the Director of Finance and Administration and the
Director of Facilities and Operations.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Approval of the Town of Pickering to extend the temporary agreement and securing a
building permit for the period November 1, 1996 to October 31, 1997 will be required.
Approval of the Pickering Harbour Company, who also participated in the Frenchman's Bay
Watch Committee, is being requested.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8525
Staff, upon approval by the Authority, will prepare and execute the necessary documents
for the period November 1, 1996 to October 31, 1997.
FINANCIAL. DEl AILS
The Club will continue as in 1995-96 to cover the costs of one portable toilet which will be
accessible to the park users, and any additional costs deemed appropriate to cover Authority
property taxes for the site area.
The Club has also agreed to assist the Authority with on-site clean-up and assist in
monitoring any activities deemed detrimental to the public's enjoyment of this area.
The Club will also maintain the trailers to the satisfaction of the Authority.
Report prepared by:
Larry Field (ext. 243)
Tom Campitelli (ext. 335)
RES ItB160/96 - MITIGATION OF TWO INSTREAM BARRIERS TO FISH PASSAGE
IN THE DON RIVER WATERSHED
Supply and delivery of quarry and field stone for construction of two
instream barriers for fish passage in the Don River at Pottery Road,
Borough of East York.
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the .....y MCI
delivery of 2-5 tonne armourstone be awarded to J.C. Rock Umited at the unit cost of
$26.00 per tonne up to a total cost of $31,200. (exduding G.S.T.);
AND FURTHER THA\T the supply and delivery of 1.0 metre die. field stone be ...... to
Nelson Aggregates at the unit cost of $31.00 per tonne up to a total cost of $31,000
(excluding G.S.T.). ............................................ CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Don Watershed Task Force developed a management strategy for the Don Watershed
prepared a report entitled, "Forty Steps To A New Don". Included in the report are specific
steps to be undertaken in order to regenerate the watershed.
Concurrent with the development of the watershed strategy was the production of
watershed fisheries management plan. The plan, presently in draft, is supported in:
B526 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
STEP16 Improve the Don's stream habitats and connections for fish.
The watershed fisheries management plan provides the direction for managing the various
aquatic habitats and fish communities within the watershed. One of the most strategic
rehabilitation activities identified in the plan is the mitigation of in stream barriers to fish
movement.
The fisheries plan identifies more than sixty in stream barriers to fish movement within the
watershed. These barriers effectively isolate watercourses and sections of watercourse by
eliminating upstream movement. Two of these barriers, located north and south of Pottery
Road in the lower Don, keep migratory fish species in Lake Ontario, from entering all but the
lower reaches of the river system. By mitigating the effect of these barriers, fish access to
more than 10km of stream habitat will be achieved.
The final design requires the construction of three rock-filled ramps downstream of the
north weir. Two downstream rock-filled ramps are to be constructed at the south weir. All
of the material will comprise quarry and natural field stone of various sizes. Placement of
the stone material will be by the Authority's annual equipment supplier, with site
supervision by Authority field staff.
Quotations have been requested for the supply and delivery of an estimated 1 ,900 tonnes
of 2-5 tonne size quarry stone and for the supply and delivery of an estimated 1,400 tonnes
of 1.0 m. dia. field stone.
RATIONALE
Quotations were received for the supply and delivery of 2-5 tonne armourstone and 1.0
metre dia. field stone as follows;
Unit Price
(pAr tnnnp.)
2-5 tnnnA ::Irmnllr~tnnA
J.e. Rock Limited $26.00
Nelson Aggregates Ltd. $29.85
1 0 mp.trp. dia liAld ~tnnp-
Nelson Aggregates Ltd. $31.00
Dufferin Aggregates . $32.00
J.e. Rock Ltd. $36.40
All of the above unit prices include the applicable provincial sales tax but exclude G.S.T.
The quotation received from J.C. Rock Ltd. for the supply and delivery of armourstone is the
same price that was awarded earlier to this company as part of the tender call for supply of
armourstone to various erosion control projects. It is recommended that their quotation be
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B527
accepted for the supply of armourstone. It is also recommended that the quotation received
from Nelson Aggregates for supply of field stone be accepted.
Due to funding constraints, and the stone quotations received, it is proposed that only the
north weir work proceed in 1996. The recommendation for award is based on the supply
and delivery of 1,200 tonnes of armourstone and 1,000 tonnes of 1 metre size field stone.
FINANCIAL DEl AILS
This work will be carried out under Account No. 113-51. The cost is being shared by The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto (Remedial Action Program) and the Great Lakes Clean
Up Fund.
For information contact:
Nigel Cowey, Ext.244
RES MB161/Q6- PALGRA VE MILL POND
Earlier this month, Ontario Streams, a non-profit organization, held a
public meeting on a project to investigate alternatives to restore fish
habitat in the vicinity of the Palgrave Dam and Mill Pond. At this
meeting, residents raised several questions about the property and
their management by the Authority.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the smff report,
dated October 23, 1996, on the Palgrave Mill Pond be received for information;
THAT Authority staff be directed to continue to provide input to the Ontario Streams project
and provide technical support to the Community Focus Group;
THAT Authority staff be directed to review the Phase I report ..cJ .n..s how it has
addressed the goals and objectives of the project, the Authority's interests, and the
residMta' concerns, and report back to the Authority;
AND FURTHER THAT. copy of this report be presented to Ontario Strums Md the
Convnunity Focus Group for information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In the spring of this year, Ontario Streams (a non profit organization) initiated a project to
investigate alternatives to restore fish habitat through the Palgrave reach of the Humber
River. The project consists of four phases:
B528 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
Phase I - Project initiation, data acquisition, option identification, and the development
of the preferred solution
Phase II - Detailed design
Phase III - Implementation
Phase IV- Follow up and monitoring
The Authority is interested in this project as a landowner and a commenting and approval
agency. Authority staff have expressed support for the process of investigating alternatives
and have emphasized to Ontario Streams the importance of public involvement and the need
to incorporate the social and cultural values of the Palgrave Dam and Mill Pond when
investigating options to enhance fish habitat. The alternatives to be investigated will
include "do nothing", full removal of the Dam, and a spectrum of options somewhere in
between.
The Humber Watershed Task Force was advised of this project at its meeting on September
17, 1996.
On October 17th. Ontario Streams held a public meeting on the Palgrave Dam Fish Habitat
Restoration Project. At this meeting residents expressed concerns about the appearance of
the pond, and raised questions about the history behind the Authority's acquisition and
management of these lands. Councillor Richard Whitehead requested that staff prepare a
report on the relevant facts related to ownership and responsibilities of the Authority and
others.
The Mill Pond is a large pond located on the Upper Humber River, in the Community of
Palgrave, in the Town of Caledon. The pond was created in the 1850's when the dam was
constructed to facilitate a mill operation. As part of the acquisition program, the Authority
has been assembling lands along the Palgrave reach of the Main Humber River since the
early 1970's, resulting in most of the pond being in Authority ownership (see attached
map). The dam structure which controls the water level of the pond is located on the west
side of Highway 150 and was acquired from MTO by the Authority in 1979.
The objective of the Authority, with respect to these lands, was to maintain the dam in
good repair in order to ensure the pond would remain. As such, the dam was reconstructed
in 1983. Concerns expressed by the residents have focused around: the reduction in pond
depth; the reduction in the open water surface area; and the increase in emergent/wetland
vegetation all of which are a natural result of sedimentation.
It should also be noted that, associated with the Palgrave Dam is a mill raceway. The
raceway was constructed to bring water onto the historic mill property to generate power
for the mill operation. This raceway is in private ownership and the landowner has a legal
right to the existing flow of water. Any works by the Authority have ensured no violation
of this right.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE '10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8529
A Community Focus Group has been set up to provide input to the Ontario Streams project
and identify the interests of the community. An Authority staff member has welcomed the
opportunity to be involved with this group as a resource person.
FUTURE DIRECTION
The Authority will continue to work with Ontario Streams and the Community Focus Group
to develop various options that will address the many issues associated with the pond and
its environment. Staff will report back on results of the Phase I report with respect to the
level to which it has addressed Authority issues, community concerns and what, if any,
further action is required.
For information contact:
Sandra Malcic, ext. 217
8530 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
!
I
,
I
i
I
I
I
)
/
"
, /
, I ,
" '
" ,
""~'
.,.~~~
,
Conlltxt Map
""
. . . . ~
~ Legend
Palgrave Dam and N Watercourses
1\/ Roads
o Ponds
Mill Pond Ownership Property Ownership
N HI MTRCA
, o Private
lee e lee :zee Jee ~e !ee ....." ,.... ,.... ~ Municipal
._.,.... rm;1 M.T.O.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B531
RES #8162/96 - REGION OF PEEL OFFICIAL PLAN - STATUS OF PLAN
APPROVAL
Receipt of the notice of approval of the Official Plan for The Regional
Municipality of Peel by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and
the identification of outstanding issues affecting the policies and
programs of the Authority.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Joan King
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT:
WHEREAS the Regional Greenlands System in the Region of Peel comprises those natural
resource features, landforms and functions of primary concern to the achievement of
Authority policies and programs; and
WHEREAS the Region of Peel has supported in policy the protection of the Regional
Greenlands System in cooperation with the Authority; and
WHEREAS the Region of Peel, in attempting to resolve an issue related to Aggregate
Resource extraction, removed the mapping of the Greenlands System from the Regional
Official Plan because it was not specific, but conceptual; and
WHEREAS it has been the Authority's position that the mapping of the Green.Mds System
should reflect all valley and stream corridors, environmental resources and IMds prone to
natural hazard, where known;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Authority strongly urges the Region to reinstate
mapping in the Official Plan to identify the Greenlands System and that Authority staff be
directed to provide assistance to the Region in the preparation of this mapping;
AND FURTHER THAT Authority staff continue to work with staff of the Region of Peel, with
respect to the technical amendments required to the Plan to those areas affecting Authority
policy and program interests.
AMENDMENT
RES #8163/96
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT Authority staff be directed to initiate an appeal with the Ontario Municipal Board to
the Official Plan for the Region of Peel, to secure the addition of a Greenlands Schedule
within the plan, and to join with the Region of Peel in appealing the imposition by the
Minister, of a schedule identifying aggregate resource areas, in so far as it may conflict with
the greensland system and other environmental resource areas as defined in the Regional
Official Plan.
8532 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE '10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
THE AMENDMENT WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARNED
BACKGROUND
Since the mid 1970s, the Region of Peel has been working toward the adoption of an
Official Plan. Authority staff has participated throughout the last twenty years. The
principal difficulty has been between the Region and the local municipalities with respect to
the contents and scope of the Plan.
Since 1993, there has been a renewed effort to get a Regional Plan in place. Authority staff
has, until recently, been closely involved in the preparation of the Official Plan, specifically
related to the regional Greenlands System policies and mapping. Over the last two years
this involvement included attendance at a subgroup of the Plan's Technical Advisory
Committee which included staff from the Region, the local municipalities and the Province.
In June 1996, in staff comments to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, we
referred to the mapping of the Regional Greenlands System, as follows:
We note that the map of the Greenlands System in Peel has been moved from being
Schedule A to the Plan to Figure 4 in the Appendix. This would suggest that it has
less importance or commitment than scheduled transportation systems, etc. We
realize that this map has been a contentious issue, however, are concerned that it
has been removed from the body of the Plan. We would recommend that, given the
stated importance of the system to Peel, it should be relocated, as a Schedule, into
Section 2.3 where the policies are located.
The reference to the map as "an issue" was specific to numerous discussions related to
environmental matters in the Regional Plan, centred on the level of detail for policy and
mapping to be included at the Regional versus the local municipal level. The Authority has
undertaken an extensive mapping program to identify all valley and stream corridors. This
information was provided to the Region. It was the desire of the local municipalities to have
the Regional Plan remain more conceptual. While Authority staff put forward the position
that all valley and stream corridors and environmental resources, where known, should be
shown, the final decision was that this would occur at the local level. Never, in any of our
discussion, however, was there a suggestion that there be no map generally identifying the
Greenlands System in the Region's Plan.
On October 16, we learned from Regional staff that, based on considerations relating to
another issue, Aggregates, the Region proposed to remove the Greenlands System map
from the Plan. The issue was that there were areas where the Greenlands System and the
Aggregate Resource areas coincided and it was agreed that high potential aggregate
resource areas that were not located in the urban settlement areas and "core. environmental
resource areas would be protected over the long term. There was concern that the existing
Greenlands mapping including lands beyond the "core" environmental resource areas as
defined in the Regional Official Plan and, given the shortage of time, the map was deleted
rather than amended or clarified.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8533
On October 17, staff wrote to Regional Council strongly urging the Region to reinstate a
Schedule in the Official Plan to identify the Greenlands System. Our letter was referred to
Regional staff for a report to Council. Staff notes that the earliest they are likely to have a
report prepared will be early December.
On October 21, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing approved the Official Plan
with modifications made by both the Region and by Ministry staff. Certain of these
technical modifications made by the Region, in consultation with Authority staff, were not
incorporated into the final approval. For example, the definition of "Flooding Hazards", for
which we had provided information, has not been corrected.
RATIONALE
Staff has discussed these issues with Regional staff and with staff of Credit Valley
Conservation Authority. It was agreed that the policies of the Plan with respect to the
Greenlands System have, generally, addressed all issues of concern. The conceptual
mapping of the Greenlands System, as it appeared in the Plan, was a compromise position
that did not really satisfy any of the parties. Regional staff is aware of the Authorities'
interest in having mapping reinstated in the Plan and Regional Council was so advised by
staff of this Authority.
It would be our hope to continue to work with the Region to seek a solution to the issue of
the delineation of the Greenlands System and to reinstate mapping to provide information
regarding the areas of known environmental resources and lands prone to natural hazards.
We have been assured by staff that the technical amendments required will be initiated.
For information contact:
Alyson Deans, Ext. 269
Renee Jarrett, Ext. 31 5
B534 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
SECTION U -ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
RI;S .8164/96 - PARTNERSHIP MEMORANDUM FOR MUNICIPAL PLAN REVIEW
Region of Durham and Conservation Authorities. Endorsement of the
Partnership Memorandum between the Region of Durham and the five
Durham Region conservation authorities which finalizes arrangements for
planning services resulting from the Provincial delegation of Plan Review
functions.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the P.rtnership Memor.,dum (as attached to this report) betw... the R.giun of
Durham end the five conservation authorities within Durham Region reg.-ding Provincial
delegation of Plan Review functions be endorsed;
AND FURTHER THAT the Region of Durham, the Towns of Pickering, Ajax Md UxlNidge....d
the four partnership conservation authorities be so advised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting 15/96, held June 28, 1996, the following Resolution #A 121/96 was
adopted:
"THA T staff be .uthorized to provide interim support and to finalize a Partnership Memor.ndum
for Municipal Plan Review between the Region of Durham and the five Durham Region
Conserv.tion Authorities substantially as set out in the attached drah Partnership
Memorandum;
THA T the finalized Partnership Memorandum be forwarded to the Executive Committee for
approval;
AND FURTHER THA T staff continue discussions to develop similar Partnership Memoranda
within the Regions of Peel, York and Metropolitan Toronto. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED-
As set out in the June 28, 1996 staff report, the draft Partnership Memorandum was to be
finalized by staff over the summer and brought forward to Durham Regional Council in
September prior to final endorsement by the conservation authorities. The final Partnership
Memorandum was considered by Durham Council at their meeting held September 11,
1996. Council has endorsed the Partnership Memorandum and has requested that it now be
formally endorsed by the conservation aufhorities.
Authority staff also reported to the Executive Committee at Meeting 17/96, held August 16,
1996 on a related issue concerning fees for planning services in Durham Region. At that
time, the Executive Committee approved an interim fee for the processing of subdivisions in
Durham Region that were being transferred because of a backlog situation at the Ministry
of Natural Resources (MNR). Staff were directed to prepare a final fee structure for
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B535
Authority approval based on municipal/industry consultation and the MTRCA Business Plan
which was approved by the Authority at Meeting being developed.
RATIONALE
The Partnership Memorandum endorsed by Durham Council is consistent with the draft
Partnership Memorandum considered by the Authority in June. Only minor editorial changes
were made over the summer. The detailed background and rationale for the Durham Region
Partnership Memorandum was set out in the June 1996 staff report (Agenda Item 6.2) from
the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board. Staff is recommending that the
finalized Partnership Memorandum be endorsed.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Discussions are on-going within the Regions of Peel, York and Metropolitan Toronto
regarding the development of similar Partnership Memoranda. We anticipate reports on this
matter to be brought forward in early 1997. The delay in the finalization of the transfer of
Provincial Plan Review functions to Peel, York and Metropolitan Toronto may result in
MTRCA providing interim support on a formalized basis to address the service backlog at
MNR.
The establishment of user fees for MTRCA Planning Services has been outlined in the 1997-
1999 Business Plan. Some revenue from this initiative has been assumed in the 1997
Preliminary Budget. The GTA Conservation Authorities are working collectively to establish
a fee schedule for planning services. Discussions have commenced with municipalities and
members of the Urban Development Institute (UD!). Staff anticipate reporting to the
Authority on a service fee schedule in December 1996.
Report prepared by: R. Jarrett, Ext. 315
8536 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
Attachment 1
PARTNERSHIP MEMORANDUM BETWEEN
THE REGIONAL MUNICJP AUTY OF DURHAM (hereinafter referred to as
"the Region") AND
THE CENTRAL LAKE ONTARIO CONSERVATION AUTHORITY,
THE METROPOUTAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY,
THE LAKE SIMCOE REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY,
THE GANARASKA REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, AND
THE KAWARTHA REGION CONSERVATION AUTHqRITY (hereinafter referred
to as lithe Conservation Authorities"
REGARDING PROVINCIAL DELEGATION OF PLANNING REVIEW FUNCTIONS
1. Purpose
The purpose of this Partnership Memorandum is:
. to coordinate the implemention of the Memorandum of Understanding
Between the Province of Ontario and the Regional Municipality of Durham
Regarding Municipal Plan Review;
. to enable the Region and the Area Municipalities in the Region to make
planning decisions on site-specific planning applications in the absence of
input from Provincial Ministries; and
. to establish a co-operative arrangement between the Region and the
Conservation Authorities to work together to improve the delivery of
planning services to the residents of the Region.
2. Goals
The goals of the partnership between the Region and the Conservation
Authorities are:
5
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B537
.-
. to effectively address issues of provincial interest in the decision-making
process on planning applications;
. to ensure the implementation of Regional and Local Official Plan policies
in the absence of provincial input
. to share infonnation which would expedite decision-making; and
. to ensure that each step of the processes developed to implement the
Delegation of Review is complementary and adds value to the decision-
making process.
3. Roles and Responsibilities of the Region:
a) The Region is responsible for ensuring that the Memorandum of
Understanding with the Province is implemented.
b) The Region will continue to consult with the ConselVation Authorities on
matters that affect their mandates or interests.
c) The Region will share any data sources provided by the Province to the
Region under the -Memorandum of Understanding Between the Province
of Ontario and the Regional Municipality of Durham Regarding Municipal
Plan Review", provided that the ConselVation Authorities are willing to
enter into any data-sharing confidentiality agreements with the Province, if
required.
4. Roles and Responsibilities of the Conservation Authorities:
a) The ConselVation Authorities will assist the Region in its role as an
approval authority through their regular comments to the Region on the
following issues on planning applications:
- infonnation and analysis on the existence of natural heritage features
such as significant woodlots, wetlands, sensitive wildlife habitats,
habitats of endangered and threatened species, significant valleylands
6
B538 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
and areas of natural and scientific interest on, or in proximity to, a
proposed development site;
- the adequacy of stormwater management plans from the perspective
of the Conservation Authority;
- the need for the applicant to obtain permits with respect to Alterations
to Watercourses; Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways
Regulations; Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act, as well as the need
for the applicant to submit a fisheries compensation plan under the
federal Fisheries Act; and
- information and analysis of natural hazards such as flooding, erosion,
unstable slopes and soils, existing on or in proximity to a proposed
development site.
b) Nothing in clause a) prevents the Conservation Authorities from advising
the Region of any issue of interest to them, as it may relate to an
application for development
5. Implementation
a) This agreement will come into effect upon endorsement by Regional
Council and the Boards of the Conservation Authorities.
b) The Region and the Conservation Authorities agree to meet on a periodic
basis to review the implementation of this agreement, and to explore
further opportunities for streamlining the implementation of the delivery of
transferred provincial planning review functions.
c) The Region and the Conservation Authorities agree to explore further
opportunities to improve the sharing of data.
d) The Conservation" Au"thorities will recover the costs, resulting from
performing functions under the Delegation of Review, from development
proponents.
7
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B539
RES #B16!i/96 - WILD WATER KINGDOM
Request for deferral of Final 1996 Lease Payment
Wild Water Kingdom has requested that the Authority defer the final 1996 lease
payments until no later than July 1, 1997.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the request by Wild Water Kingdom for deferral of the final 1996 .... payments, at
an interest rete of prime plus 1 % and to be repaid no later than July 1, 1997, be approved;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to take the necessary action to implenw1t the
foregoing, including the receipt of any necessary consent and approval of Wild Water
Kingdom's mortgagees in fulfilment of the existing terms and conditions of the Wild Water
Kingdom lease agreement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Wild Water Kingdom is a private corporation which leases lands located at the Authority's
Claireville Conservation area. The Authority receives a base rent plus a share of the gross
revenue of the Water Park as part of its lease commitment. Lease payments are required 30
days following the end of each month.
In each of the last three years, the Authority has approved a deferral of the final rental
payment until the end of June the following year. In each case, Wild Water Kingdom has
repaid the outstanding rental payment on time with interest.
This arrangement has proved advantageous to the Authority as the rate of interest has been
at, or above, the rate of interest the Authority would have received on its investments.
Agreements negotiated with Wild Water Kingdom include a provision that default on the
outstanding rental payment constitutes default on the lease and all of the appropriate
penalties apply.
ANALYSIS
In 1996, as indicated in the attached letter from Dr. Edward Siu Chong, President of Wild
Water Kingdom, Wild Water Kingdom expects to end the annual operating season with a
negative cashflow.
The audited financial statements should be available near the end of the year. However,
based on preliminary estimates, approximately $112,000 is owing to the Authority in
percentage rent and $32,296 of the base rent. Wild Water Kingdom has agreed that from
September 30 on, the interest rate of prime plus 1 % would apply to the outstanding
balance of the percentage rent and from August 31, 1996, for the base rent.
In past years the Authority has granted deferrals based on similar conditions. The amounts
deferred have ranged from a high of $210,000 in 1991 to a low of $87,000 in 1994.
Staff recommends the deferral of rent subject to the agreement of the Canadian Western
Bank and the Royal Bank as required under the terms and conditions of the lease. Wild
Water Kingdom has had deferrals of rent in the past and has repaid the amounts with
interest by the end of June in the following year. The risk to the Authority is minimal since
a default on the amount outstanding requires that the Canadian Western Bank and/or the
Royal Bank make good on the outstanding rental payment or risk having the park taken over
B540 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
by the Authority. It is highly unlikely that the Canadian Western Bank or the Royal Bank
would allow the default on an amount less than $150,000 to result in the total assets of
Wild Water Kingdom being seized by the Authority.
For informMion contact:
Jim Dillane, Ext. 220
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B541
MUd Water
oK I N G D 0 M.
October:. 1996
Metropolitan Toronto &
Region Conservation Authority
5 Shoreham Dr
Downsview, Ontario
M3N I S4
Attention: ~ Jim Dillane
Dear fun,
As you are aware, this past summer was a great disappointment~ It was too wet, too cloudy and too
cool. Both June and July had almost twice the average JITlount of rainfall ( 126mm and 123mm of rain
versus the historic average of6imm and 71mm respectively) In addition, July was significantly cooler
than average and was one of the coolest and wettest m recent history (other than July 1991. of course)
As a direct result of the unusually poor weather conditions and some increased competition from the
new waterpark at Canada' s Wonderland. our general attendance and revenue dropped significantly At
the end of July, general attendance was 15,000 guests (or ~O%) less than the same period last year Our
financial statements are not yet available. However. we :an ?roject at this time that total revenue at the
end of the season was significantly below last year This combined with capital improvements and
principal repayments of 5250,000 and an opening accounts payable from 1995 ofS500,OOO are
estimated to result in a negative cashflow
We therefore respectfully request that we be allowed to defer the rent payable for the month of August
1996 As in the past, the outstanding balance would be paid with interest at the rate of prime plus 1 %,
no later than July I, 1997. This defennent will greatly assist in our cash requirements for the 1997 pre-
season expenses and the installation of the planned Go-KJ."'t faciiities
As always. we thank you for your consideration and ongoing support in this.project.
Yours very truly,
Wild Water Kingdom
->t.&~ .
Dr. Edward Siu chonJ
President
\lII'OI"d.d.a.'\JII'Wk'mU'a'ent
~
~ P.rk .:lddress. ~a~~ = ~C" ~ .e-~e ."Ies: 9rarr::cn :":aco .57 :!y~ Tel (SQ5J7S~~55 F.. :S0517S"'~Q7'
"- Head Office ~ :.o!'hr;:=:n ~~~o!!'~ :.Js: 3u,~e~: 7Qrcl"'~o ::"raro '.15:' 'C5 Tell~16i~63,.ij;7.1 F.u :~~lj)~69.':9Se
B542 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
R~S M8166/96 - DON WATERSHED STRATEGY
Consulting Services for a Regeneration Plan
for Wilket Creek (also known as Milne Creek)
Lower West Don Subwatershed. Awarding of a contract for the
provision of consulting services for the Wilket Creek Regeneration Plan.
This is a three phased project which will be implemented in consultation
with the applicable area municipalities and members of the public.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT staff be directed to award the contract for the development of a Regeneretion Plan
for Wilket Creek (also known .. Milne Creek) to the consulting firm of Aquafor Beech
Limited in .,sociation with Todhunter Schollen a.. Associates Limited end Beak International
Limited for the amount of $30,000 (excluding G.S.T.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Wilket Creek (also known as Milne Creek) Sub-basin is one of the most heavily
urbanized drainage basins in the Don Watershed. Wilket Creek drains an area of
approximately 1,450 ha of which almost all is in some form of urban development. A large
percentage of the valleyland along the main tributary is in public ownership and has been
set aside as greenspace. The parks located along Wilket Creek include: Wilket Creek Park,
Edwards Gardens, Banbury Park, York Mills Park and Windfields Park. Extensive
infrastructure, in the form of pathways and bridges is present along significant portions of
the creek. The majority of the parkland is managed by The Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto, including all of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
(MTRCA) owned valleylands, with some of the parkland owned by the City of North York.
Many of these parks are heavily used.
Wilket Creek has been the focus of many costly, but necessary in-stream works over a great
many years. Today, many of the old structures have failed due to undercutting or lateral
movement of the creek. As a result, the creek contains many erosion scars, a number of
which are threatening pedestrian bridges and pathways.
In the past, remedial works have proceeded in a site specific manner, with little regard to
the sub-basin as a whole. This "patchwork" approach, while generally effective in the short
term, does very little to prevent future problems. A detailed plan, utilizing a sub watershed
approach, is required in order to integrate all the various aspects of watershed regeneration
as outlined in the Don planning document, "Forty Steps to a New Don ~ This plan will act as
a blueprint to .address the ongoing erosion and flooding problems along Wilket Creek, in a
more holistic and thus, cost effective manner.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B543
MTRCA staff, in consultation with staff members at Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Culture,
have identified the necessity to develop an overall regeneration plan for the Wilket Creek
sub-basin which will:
- utilize a sub watershed approach to planning as advocated in "Forty
Steps to 8 New Don ";
- identify future control options for the entire sub-basin;
- develop a conceptual regeneration plan for the valley and stream
corridor south of York Mills Road (where the creek surfaces); and
- develop detailed design and construction drawings to initiate a
program of regeneration with appropriate partners.
The following consultants were asked to submit a proposal:
Gartner Lee Associates Ltd.
Fenco Mclaren
Dillon Consulting Limited
Aquafor Beech Limited
Harrington and Hoyle Ltd.
Todhunter, Schollen & Associates Limited
The results of the Call for Proposal process based on the cost limit set in the terms of
reference are:
Cnn~lIltant~ Casts
Dillon Consulting Limited $30,000 (excluding GST)
and Greenland Engineering Group
Gartner Lee and Paul Cosburn Declined
Fenco Maclaren Declined
Harrington and Hoyle Ltd. $30,000 (excluding GST)
Aquafor Beech Limited $30,000 (excluding GST)
Todhunter Schollen & Associates Limited
Beak International Limited
RATIONALE
A review and analysis were conducted by MTRCA staff of the three proposals submitted. It
was determined that.Aquafor Beech; in association with Todhunter Schollen & Associates
Limited and Beak International Limited, could best fulfill the requirements set out in the call
for proposals.
FINANCIAL Del AILS
Funds are available for this project in account numbers 118-10 and 113.59.
Report prepared by:
Brian Dundas, Ext. 262
B544 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
Adele Freeman Ext. 238
RI:S #&167/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 1 58 written permission from the
Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be
constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a
Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or
on such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river,
creek, stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(7.4.1 - 7.4.8 It 7.4.23) which are listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
(7 4 1) RAg inn nf PeAl - Pllhlir. Wnrlc~ DAp::lrtmAnt
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 8, Concession 7 (Albion), (north side
of King Street between Humber - Lea Road and John Street, Bolton), in the Town of
Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by MTRCA and
Town of Caledon.
The purpose is to place fill material in conjunction with the installation of a 300 millimetre
diameter watermain, within the Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B545
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Drawing; prepared by the Region of Peel - Public Works OepertmMt; ProjKt 96-
1370; Plen 21251-0 dated March 16, 1995; received August 16, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prn"n~l:
The Region of Peel Public Works Department proposes to install a 300 millimetre diameter
watermain by boring and jacking beneath the Humber River channel. An easement request
for the watermain and storm sewer lines was also approved at Meeting #9/96 of the
Executive Committee. The watermain construction will entail the temporary stockpiling of
excavated fill material within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the
Humber River.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
Post construction grades will match pre-development ground elevations within the flood
plain; all excess fill material will be removed from the flood plain.
Pnlllltinn'
Silt fencing will be installed between the bore pits and the river channel in order to impede
the migration of construction-generated sediment.
cnn~p.rvatinn nf l::Ind'
All areas disturbed within the riparian zone will be revegetated with native trees, shrubs and
ground covers by Town of Caledon staff, in cooperation with MTRCA Nursery staff.
Pnlir.v Gllidp.linp.~'
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28151 Application #:175/96/CAL
For information contact: George Leja, ext. 342
Date: 1996.10.24.
B546 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
(7 4 ?)Carltnn C::Irrl~
To alter a watercourse on Part Blocks 0, Hand K, Registered Plan 895, (55 West
Drive), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property
owned by the City of Brampton.
The purpose is to construct a storm sewer outfall to a tributary of the Etobicoke Creek in
order to facilitate the redevelopment of a commercial property.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Lot Grading ..d Storm Water Management Plan; prepared by Habuh Architect -
Otma Consultants Ltd.; Project 96202; Drawing LG-1; dated July 17, 1996; received
Sept.... 12, 1996.
(2) Silt Fence and Sediment Trap PI.. ..d Standard Detail Plan; pr.......-d by City of
Brempton, Public Works Department; Drawing 406; Revision 2 dated June 4, 1992,
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al :
To construct a 450 mm diameter storm sewer outfall to a tributary of the Etobicoke Creek
at West Drive and York Boulevard to support the construction of an expanded parking lot in
association with a new commercial outlet (Winners) on the site. The channel is an existing
concrete lined trapezoidal drainage channel.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnrling'
The applicant has submitted a storm water management report confirming that the site
expansion will control post development flows up to the 100 year storm event. Water
quality control will be provided by stormceptors in the catch basins. An hydraulic analysis
of the culvert immediately upstream has confirmed that the existing channel has the
capacity to convey the redirected drainage.
Pnllutinn'
Sediment controls including a check dam at the outlet and crushed stone filters around
catch basins will be provided to control sedimentation during construction.
Cnn~rvatinn nf Lanrl'
No issues.
Pnlir.y Guirlp.linp.~'
The proposed works comply with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing. The works have been approved by the
City (owners of the drainage channel).
CFN: 28184 Application #: 189/96/BRAM
For information contact: Richard Lloyd, PI... Analyst, Ext. 281
Date: 1996.10.23.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B547
(7 4 ~ Gi~l::a W::alr.h
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 23, Registered Plan 2468, (60 Hillside
Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to undertake fill placement in order to fill in a swimming pool and regrade the
rear yard of an existing residential property in a Fill Regulated Area and flood plain of a
tributary of the West Don River.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) fIlM; entitled Mr. and Mrs J. Walsh; prepared by S. W....ters; dated received October
21, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
PrnpnUlI:
To place approximately 400 m3 of fill in the rear yard of an existing residence in order to fill
in a swimming pool excavation and restore the rear yard grade to a similar slope as that of
adjacent properties. Approximately 20 m3 of the proposed fill is located in the flood plain;
the balance within the Fill Regulated Area.
cnntrnl nf Flnnrting'
The majority of the filling will be required above the Regional floodline for the tributary. The
north limit of the fill area will extend into the flood plain in order to achieve positive lot
grading. The control of flooding will not be affected as the depth of fill in this area will be
approximately 0.1 metres.
Pnlllltinn'
The proposed fill area will be stabilized with temporary ground cover and hydro-seeded
immediately.
Cnn~p.rv::ltinn nf Uind'
The proposal will restore the original grade to the rear yard and bring it into conformance
with adjacent properties in the reach.
Pnlic:y GlJirtp-linp.~'
The works are in conformance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program, Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures.
CFN: 28232 Application #:212/96NAUG
For information contact: Richard Lloyd, ext. 281
Date: 1996.10.25.
B548 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
(7 4 4) Paul McGrAgnr
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 7, Registered Plan 5696, (18 Echo Valley Road),
in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to construct a 125 m2 (1350 ft.2) addition to an existing residence in the
flood plain of the Mimico Creek.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site PIerI, Basement Plan; prepared by Hicks Architect; Drawing A 1; dated revised
October 15, 1996.
(2) Letter from Mr. Peter Kulba, P. Eng., President, Brenik Engineering Incorporated; to
Mr. William Hicks of William R. Hicks Architects Inc. regarding a structural analysis of
the existing foundation walls.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~l:
To construct a 125 m2 second floor addition to an existing residence in the flood plain of
Mimico Creek.
cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The west side of the existing structure is susceptible to approximately 1 metre of flooding
under Regional Storm conditions. A structural analysis has been submitted confirming that
the existing foundation walls can withstand expected flood conditions. The addition is 50%
of the size of the existing structure.
Pnllutinn'
No fill is proposed as part of the application
Pnlicy GuidAlinp.~'
The works are in conformance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program, Section 4.2.2 C - Minor additions within non-established communities.
CFN: 28193 Application II: 195/96/ETOB
For information contact: Richard Lloyd, Plans Analyst, Ext. 281
Date: 1996.10.23.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B549
(7 4 ~) St GAnrgp.'~ Gnlf anti cnllntry clllh
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 16, Concession A F.H., (1668 IslinQton Avenue),
in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to undertake erosion protection works on a tributary of the Humber River
(Silver Creek).
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Letter of Undertaking by Oeboreh A. Keay of Cosburn Patterson ....... Limited
deted October 25, 1996 regarding erosion repair works; received October 25, 1996
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpnul:
To undertake erosion protection at three locations on Silver Creek within the existing golf
course. The works involve the removal of an old dam structure and a combination of
armourstone and rip-rap bank treatment as well as the overbank areas.
cnntrol nf Flnntiing'
The works will not significantly alter the existing hydraulic cross-section of the watercourse.
The control of flooding will not be affected.
Pnlhltinn'
Sediment control during construction will be provided by one of the following two methods:
- coffer dams and bypass flumes around the working areas; or
- restricting construction access to areas outside the low flow channel
Cnn~Arvatinn nf Lanti.
The area adjacent to the protection works (armourstone and rip rap) will be planted with
native woody vegetation. Site conditions allow for regrading of the overbank in one
location, which will reduce overbank velocities and erosion.
Pnlicy GlIitip.linA~'
The proposal is in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program, Section 4.2.2 H) - Existing Resource Based uses.
CFN: 28172 Application II: 188/96/ETOB
For information contact: Richard Lloyd, Ext. 281
Dete: 1996.10.23.
B550 EXECUTIVE COMMI~E #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
(7 4 6) Danart1~ ManagAmAnt I td
To place fill within a regulated area and construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 66,
Concession 1 WYS, (Maple Grove Avenue), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber
River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill for landscaping purposes and to construct a new bungalow
within a regulated area.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Det8iIs and Elevations Plan; prepared by Spectrum Design; Project 754-1748;
Drawings 1, 1A, 4 and 5 dated September 1996; received October 23, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~1 :
The applicant proposes to undertake the construction of a new bungalow on an existing lot
of record within the existing community of Oak Ridges. For the most part the new
bungalow will be located at the outer fringe of the regulatory flood plain. A small corner of
the garage will marginally extend into the flood plain where the depths are approximately .2
metres. Minor filling and regrading will occur for landscaping purposes. A 10 metre planted
riparian buffer will be established at the rear of the lot where it abuts a wetland feature.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
Only minor filling and regrading will occur in the flood plain. There will be no negative
impacts on the control of flooding.
Pnllutinn'
All disturbed areas will be seeded or sodded on completion. A siltation fence will be erected
during the construction period.
Cnn~Arvatinn nf l::Ind'
A 10 metre planted riparian buffer will be established at the rear of the lot where it abuts a
wetland feature.
Pnlir.v GllidAlinA~'
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.2.2(G) Development within Highly Urbanized
Areas of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: Application #:
For information contact: Barry Knox (ext. 268)
Date: 1996.10.28.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B551
(7 4 7) Annp- and Andrp-w Brp-thnur
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 23 and Part Lots 22 and 24 , Registered Plan
2478, (49 Plymbridge Road - Hogg's Hollow), in the City of North York, Don River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a front entrance vestibule addition and rear
kitchen/office/mudroom addition onto the existing single family dwelling, within the Regional
Storm flood plain of the West Don River.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) PIMa; prepared by Spragge" Company Architects; Job 96-1040; Dr.wings SP1,
dated August 1996, received October 11, 1996; Drawings A5 and A6, dated August
1996, received October 23, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Propn~al:
The proposal consists of constructing additions measuring a total area of 50.4 square
metres onto the existing 239.5 square metre, detached residential dwelling. The
construction will involve an entrance vestibule addition to the front of the house, as well as
a kitchen/office/mudroom addition on the rear side of the building. The entire property is
located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the West Don River
and the Hogg's Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA).
cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The proposed additions will be dry-passive floodproofed to above the 350 year storm flood
elevation which is prescribed as the minimum level of floodproofing for proposed structures
in the Hogg's Hollow SPA document. No fill placement is proposed as part of the
construction.
Pnllutinn'
Sedimentation is not expected from the proposed works. The construction area is located
35 metres from the watercourse channel.
Cnn~p-rvatinn nf u.nd'
All disturbed areas will be re-sodded following the completion of construction.
Pnlir.y Guidp-linp.~'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification
Within Established Communities/Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program and the Hogg's Hollow SPA (City of North York
Official Plan Amendment 375).
CFN: 28206 Application #:203/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.10.24.
B552 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
(7 4 8) Phylli~ Ching
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, Registered Plan 8485, (41 Francine
Drive), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to place fill material behind a new retaining wall located along the rear
property boundary, within the Fill Regulated area of the East Don River.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site MCI Details Plans; prepared by K.C. Wong, P. Eng., Drawings SK-1 and SK-2,
deted October 2, 1996; received October 11, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al:
The proposal consists of placing fill material behind a new 1.2 metre high concrete uniblock
retaining wall. An initial inspection by Authority Enforcement staff revealed that the
construction of the wall and backfilling had already been completed. The remaining work
involves the application of topsoil and sod over the filled backyard area. Only the rear yard
of the property is located within the Fill Regulated Area of the East Don River tributary.
cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The property is situated outside the Regional Storm flood plain.
Pnlllltinn'
No sedimentation has occurred to date, nor is any expected as part of the final grading
work.
cnn~p.rvatinn nf Land'
The as-built retaining wall is located on tableland, approximately 5 metres away from the
physical top-of-bank of the stable valley wall of this East Don River tributary. The alignment
of the wall is also consistent with other, existing backyard retaining structures along this
reach of the valley corridor. Authority technical staff has reviewed the wall design and is
satisfied that the structure has been properly constructed and will not affect slope stability
or adjacent properties.
Pnlir.y Gllidp.linp.~'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28222 Application #:205/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.10.24.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8553
RI;S ...1U/9a - APPUCATlONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPlICATIONS
All information was received and recommendations for approval finalized
for the following applications that had been scheduled on the Agenda as
errata items.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario ReguIrion 158 for those iippIic8tions
th8t h8d been KheduIed on the agenda as errata items (7.4.9- 7.4.22, with the ex.... of
Pwmit 7.4.21) for which all the required information was received and fiMIized .. listed
below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
(7 4 ~) 1 O~ Frnnt StrAAt FA~t Inr.
To construct in the flood plain at 109 Front Street East, in the City of Toronto, Don
River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a new apartment co-op building within the Special Policy Area
for the City of Toronto.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 2001.
(1) Site Plan and Elevation Details 109 Front St. East; prepared by Page and Steale
Architects and Planners; Drawings 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5; received October 25, 1996.
(Total Plans 5)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpnsal:
The applicant proposes to construct a new residential apartment building within the Special
Policy Area of the City of Toronto. The building will be floodproofed to the Regional Storm
Elevation. The building is the final phase of a 3 phase development. Phases 1 and 2 were
approved by the Executive Committee in 1995.
Pnllutinn'
The works will have no impact on the control of flooding.
cnn~ArvAtinn nf l::Ind'
The site is within the City of Toronto street system and is surrounded by existing
development. There will be no impact on the conservation of land.
Pnlir.y GllidAlinA~'
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.1 - Development within Special Policy Areas
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
B554 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
CFN: 28225 Application #:208/96/TOR
For infonnetion contact: Ru.... White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.10.24.
(7 4 10)Wyndham Cnllrt Canada Inr.
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lots 7, 8, 9,10 and 11, Registered Plan 108,
(60 Mill Street), in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a residential apartment building on the subject property within
the City of Toronto Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 2001 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) P.-king Level Plans; prepared by Quadrangle Architects Limited; Project 96013;
Drawings A201, A202 and A203; as received on October 11, 1996.
(2) Third Floor Plan; prepared by Quadrangle Architects Limited; Project 96013; Drawing
A213; as received October 11, 1996.
(3) Building Details and Elevations Plans; prepared by Quadrangle Architects Limited;
Project 96013; Drawings A401, A402, A403, A404, A405 and A602: as received
October 11, 1996.
(4) Phase One and Two Landscape Plans; prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects;
Project 96-153; Drawing L-1; as received on October 11, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpnsal:
The applicant proposes to construct an apartment building by utilizing the historic facade of
an old building located within the former Gooderham and Worts site. The works are within
the Special Policy Area for the City of Toronto. The building will be floodproofed to the
1 :350 year flood level; the minimum requirement for flood proofing under the Special Policy
Area policies.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The site is subject to depths in excess of 1 metre. The site is also within a developed area
within the City of Toronto where servicing requirements restrict changes to grade. In
addition, as the historical facade is being utilized, changes to the first floor elevations are
not achievable. Given the fixed infrastructure, the depths of flooding and the use of the
existing facades,> the maximum"flood proofing achievable is the 1 :350 year elevation. This
standard meets the requirements of the Special Policy Area.
Pnlllltinn'
There will be no impact on the control of pollution.
cnn~p.rvatinn nf L ::Ind'
The site is within a developed urban setting and is surrounded by the city street grid
system. There will be no impact on the conservation of land.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B555
Pnlir.y GlJidAlinA~'
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development within Special Policy
Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program and in
compliance with the City of Toronto's Official Plan.
CFN: 28224 Application #:204/96rrOR
For information contact: Russel White (Ext. 306)
Date: 1996.10.24.
(7 4 1 1 )AlJdrAY Snlary
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 31, Concession 5, (4206 19th Avenue), in the
Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake stream bank protection.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan showing proposed location of stream bank protection at 4206 19th
Avenue; prepared by appliCMt; received September 18, 1996.
(2) RecI4Nt Revision Cross-Section, Streambank Protection at 4206 19th Avenue;
prepared by Sator and Susin Erosion Control; received September 18, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al :
A 20 metre section of a 1.2 metre high stream bank, along a stream which bisects to an
existing residential lot, has been eroding and undermining landscaping and a lawn area. In
order to arrest this erosion the owner is proposing to place field stone along the bank.
B556 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The works will not alter the hydraulic characteristics of the reach.
Pnlhltinn'
All work will be done from the tableland. No equipment will entre the watercourse. All
disturbed areas will be seeded, sodded or mulched immediately following the works.
Cnn~rvatinn nf Land'
Fish habitat will not be impacted by this work. Our staff are working with the home owner
to restore the riparian vegetation with native shrubs and trees.
Pnlir.y Gllidp.linp.~'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 3.3 Policies and Procedures for Identifying Watercourses
and Alterations.
CFN:28069 Application #: 133/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Date: 1996.10.24.
(7 4 1 ?Cnn~lImAr~ Ga~
To place fill within a regulated area and alter a watercourse on Part Lot 5,
Concession 3, (Kirkhams Road), in the City of Scarborough, Rouge River Watershed
as located on property owned by MTRCA and City of Scarborough.
The purpose is to install a new gas main under the Rouge River at Kirkhams Road.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998.
(1 ) Gas Main Realignment Plan, Kirkhams Road, City of Scarborough; prepared by
Consumer's Gas; Drawing 10-0828; received November 4, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
RATIONAlE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~l:
The existing gas main which crosses under the Rouge River and supplies the Zoo property is
exposed in the river bed and stream bank. Consumers Gas is proposing to realign the gas
main from the east side of Kirkhams Road to the west side. The new alignment is located
on property owned by the Authority and the City of Scarborough. An easement is required
and is currently.being finalized with Authority Staff.
The gas main is to be augured under Kirkhams Road and the watercourse. Disturbance will
be limited to the access areas and the four auguring pits. The access road on the west side
is along an existing access road for sewer maintenance. On the east side the access will be
along the old alignment of Kirkhams Road and on sedimentary deposits under the bridge .
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B557
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
Grades will not be changed as a result of this work. There will be no impact on the control
of flooding.
Pnlhltinn'
All disturbed areas will be stabilised with grasses immediately following the work. A
sediment fence will be installed prior to the construction to protect the watercourse. No
machinery will enter the watercourse.
cnn~u~rvatinn nf Land'
The site of the gas main realignment is within ESA #82 (Morningside Creek Forest). The
area has been disturbed in the past with the construction of Kirkhams Road and a Metro
sanitary sewer. Although the access areas and construction sites are to be fenced, up to 10
trees may be affected by the work. Any trees lost will be replaced with two trees of
native species. Restoration will focus on the riparian area and forest edge.
An archeological investigation is to be undertaken shortly, and the appropriate action taken
following the analysis of the results.
Pnlir.y GllidAlinA~'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.2 Servicing and Infrastructure.
CFN: 27992 Application #:099/96/SCAR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, ext. 304
Date: 1996.10.28.
(7 4 13)VallAywnnd GardAns Inc:
To place fill within a regulated area and alter a watercourse on Part Lot 3,
Concession 1 WHS, (east of Highway 10 north of Mayfield Road), in the Town of
Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake regrading in a Fill Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek and
construction of a storm water management pond in order to facilitate the development of a
residential subdivision (21T-83032, 21T-83033 Phase 3).
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 2001.
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Anton Kikas Ltd.; Project 419E-96; Drawings 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 15
and 19; dated June 1996. (Total Plans 7)
(2) Letter of Undertaking from M.A.-Tarras,-Engineering Manager of Anton Kikas Ltd.;
dated October 2, 1996, regarding Landscape Planting Plan. (Total Documents 1)
RATIONAlE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
B558 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
Prnpn~l:
To regrade in a Fill Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek and to construct a storm water
quality facility out letting to the Etobicoke Creek. The works are required to facilitate Phase
3 of the Valley wood Gardens subdivision. The location is on land partly owned by
Valleywood Gardens Ltd. and partly owned by MTRCA (previously obtained from
Valleywood). The land transfer request pertaining to this application is included in Section 1
of this agenda.
cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The proposed pond is required as part of an overall storm water management plan for the
Valleywood Gardens subdivisions approved in 1990. The original pond location was
northwest of the current location in the Etobicoke Creek valley. As this original site was
within the 100 year flood plain, the consultant investigated alternative locations that were
less flood susceptible.
The proposed pond will be located primarily outside the 100 year storm flood plain and can
be constructed mainly through excavation. A revised hydraulic report has been submitted
confirming that the pond construction will not significantly impact existing flood levels. The
pond provides for 25mm - 24 hour runoff detention for water quality and erosion control
purposes. Quantity control is not required in this location pursuant to the recommendation
of the draft water management study for the Etobicoke Creek watershed undertaken for the
Authority by Schaeffer Associates (1995). The Town of Caledon will be assuming
maintenance of this pond.
Pnlhltinn'
An erosion and sedimentation plan has been provided indicating measures to be undertaken
during construction.
cnn~ervatinn nf l::Ind'
The proponent has undertaken a vegetation inventory of the proposed pond location and
confirmed that no significant vegetation losses will occur as a result of the pond
construction. The applicant has also undertaken to produce a rehabilitation plan for the
pond and adjacent riparian corridor.
Pnlir.y Gllidp.linp.~'
The works are in conformance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program, Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Serv,icing.
CFN: 28094 Application #: 146/96/CAL
For informetion cont8Ct: Richard Lloyd, Ext. 281
Date: 1996.10.07.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8559
(7 4 14)carlingviAw Airpnrt Inn
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 21, Concession 3 FTH, (north end of
Galaxy boulevard west of Royal Woodbine Golf Course), in the City of Etobicoke,
Mimico Creek Watershed as located on property owned by Imperial Ufe Real Estate
Investments.
The purpose is to place fill material for the creation of a new parking area within the Fill
Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998.
(1 ) Letter of Undertaking from Virg Jacobelli, Managing Director, Carlingview Airport Inn;
dated October 29, 1996; received October 30, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn_l:
The proposal consists of placing fill material within a remnant draw of the Mimico Creek
valley in order to create a vehicle parking/storage area. Filling activity has commenced prior
to the owner first obtaining a permit under Ontario Regulation 158; the application has been
submitted to resolve an outstanding violation for the fill already placed at this site. The
majority of this property is situated within the Fill Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek.
cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The filled area is located outside the Regional Storm flood plain of the Mimico Creek. The
applicant's consultant is in the process of preparing a storm water management report for
this 2 ha. site. No runoff will be permitted to enter the adjacent Royal Woodbine Golf
Course property, within the valley corridor. The City of Etobicoke Works Department has
requested Authority staff review the storm water management report on its behalf.
Pnllutinn'
A sedimentation control fence will be installed and maintained at the rear property boundary
until all disturbed areas have been stabilized/revegetated.
cnn~p.rvatinn nf Land'
Based on inspections of aerial photographs on-file, no defined valley feature (or function)
existed at this site prior to fill placement. The original ravine feature was likely eliminated at
the time the area was deve'loped for commercial and industrial uses. The slope at the rear
(ie. east end) of the filled area will blend into the physical top-of-bank of the valley wall at
the northeast and southeast corners of the remnant draw. In addition, the entire slope
adjacent to the golf course will be planted with native trees and shrubs, as well as
maintenance-free ground cover vegetation. Authority technical staff will provide comments
on slope stability-related issues once the final design drawings have been submitted for
review and approval.
B560 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
Pnlicy GlIidAlinA~'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28077 Application #: 136/96/ETOB
For infonnMion contact: George Leje (ext. 342)
Date: 1996.10.25.
(7 4 Hi) Dnn I-Ip';ld ViII;lQp. Ltd
To alter a watercourse on Lot 45, Blocks 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33, Registered Plan
65M-2366, (190 Harding Boulevard), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to pipe an 80 metre remnant portion of a tributary of the East Don River.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 2001.
(1 ) Storm Sewer Extension Site Plan, Pepperhill West Townhouse Development;
prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan; Contract 10-93-005; Drawing SP2;
received April 1, 1996.(Total Plans 1)
(2) Redline Revision Sediment Control Plan, Pepperhill West Townhouse Development;
prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan; Contract 10-93-005; Drawing SC2;
received April 1, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
(3) Correspondence from Andrew Ip, Project Engineer of Marshall Macklin Monaghan
regarding Redline Revision Pepperhill Phase 2; dated October 25, 1996; received
October 31, 1996. (Total Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~l:
A cold water tributary of the East Don River flows under Major Mackenzie Road and into the
development site of Don Head Village. In the mid 1980's, this tributary was picked up and
diverted to the East Don River in the storm sewer system for Phase 1 of the development,
resulting in an 80metre remnant portion which remains open immediately downstream of
Major Mackenzie Road. At that time, approximately 210 metres of watercourse was lost.
Although Authority staff did not object to the storm water design for the Phase 1 site, it is
unclear if the diversion and enclosure was recognised through the planning process. A
permit was not issued for the enclosure from either The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (MTRCA) or the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR).
As part of Phase 2, the applicant now wishes to enclose the remaining portion of the
watercourse. Staff are prepared to support the enclosure because:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 110/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B561
the watercourse was moved out of the original stream corridor and channel feature
when the watercourse was diverted;
enhancement using natural channel design principles is not practical for the site;
the flow has been disconnected from the original watercourse downstream; and,
most of the original downstream watercourse has been piped leaving only a very few
small reaches open.
Pursuant to the Don Accord between the Ministry of Natural Resources and MTRCA, our
staff contacted MNR staff to discuss resulting impacts on fish habitat. It was agreed that
the proposal resulted in a loss of fish habitat
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The pipe enclosure will be connected to the existing culvert under Major Mackenzie Road
using the same capacity, and connected to the storm system in Phase 1 which currently
carries the flow. The control of flooding on the site will not be altered, and there will be no
changes in flows upstream or downstream.
Pnllutinn'
A by-pass channel will be used to convey flow around the site when the pipe is being laid.
During connection of the pipe, the stream flow will be pumped around the work area.
These practices will reduce the input of sediment into the storm pond and watercourse
downstream.
cnn~p.rv;atinn nf I ;and'
Pursuant to the Federal Fisheries Act, an agreement is being formulated for the replacement
of the loss of fish habitat. The proponent has tentatively agreed to contribute up to
$100,000 towards the Town's and Authority's restoration project on the Pioneer Park Pond.
Pnlir.y Guidp.linp.~'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 3.3 Policies and Procedures for Identifying Watercourses
and Alterations.
CFN:27911 Application 1:65/96/RH
For information contact: Mary Asselstine (ext. 304)
Dllte: 1996.10.24.
B562 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
(7 4 16)UAtrn Parlc~ and culturA DApartmAnt
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 5, Concession 2, (Leslie Street and Lawrence
Avenue East - Edwards Gardens), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as
located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to alter the channel of Wilket Creek by removing accumulated sediment from
the on-stream ponds at Edwards Gardens, within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River
system.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998.
(1 ) Layout and Detail Plans; prepared by H. Sustronk and Assoc. (1980) Ltd.; Project 96-
80; Drawing 1 and 2 dated September 1996; received September 25, 1996. (Total
Plans 2)
(2) Letter of Undertaking regarding Sediment Control from Hans Sustronk and Assoc.
(1980) Ltd. dated October 29, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~1 :
The proposal consists of removing accumulated sediment from the on-stream ponds within
Edwards Gardens. The sediment loading in the ponds nas reached a critical level and is
presently affecting flood storage capacity. An increasing odour problem is also evident at
the site. The silt to be excavated has been tested in accordance with the Authority's Fill
Quality Guidelines and has subsequently been approved for backfilling at the former Domtar
site located in the Borough of East York. The existing ponds are situated within the Fill
Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain of the Wilket Creek.
cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The original flood storage capacity of the Edwards Gardens ponds will be reinstated as a
result of the proposed dredging works. All excavated fill material will be removed from the
site.
Pnllutinn'
Authority staff are presently reviewing the method of sedimentation control with the
applicant's consultant. In addition, staff are also consulting with the Ministry of Natural
Resources (MNR) Biologist regarding design changes which will minimize aquatic habitat
destruction. All measures related to controlling silt during the dredging operation and
habitat mitigation will be addressed to the satisfaction of staff prior to the issuance of a
permit.
Cnn~rvatinn nf l::Ind'
As part of the on-going Wilket Creek Reach Plan under The Don Watershed Strategy, staff
will investigate opportunities for renaturalizing the banks of the on-stream ponds with native
vegetation.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8563
Pnlir.y GlJidAlinA~'
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.2.2(H) - Existing Resource-based Uses - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28194 Application #: 194/96/NY
For information contact: George Lejs (ext. 342)
Oet.: 1996.10.25.
(74 17)M,.",. Tnmnry
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 1, Concession 4, (42 Warden lane), in the Town
of Whitchurch-Stouffville, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to undertake bank restoration and improve the stability of a berm associated
with an existing on-line pond.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998.
(1) Site Plan showing Construction of Bank Protection, 42 Warden lane, Town of
Whitchurch Stouffville; prepared by applicant; received August. 1, 1996.
(2) Redline Revision Details of Bank Protection, 42 Warden lane, Town of Whitchurch
Stouffville; prepared by applicant; received November 6, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~l:
An on-line pond on Bruces Creek is located on the north side of the Stouffville Road at
Warden Ave. The existing berm is eroding on the upstream side adjacent to the dam
structure. The applicant is proposing to strengthen the berm by re-enforcing approximately
35 m of the pond edge on the east side of the dam with armourstone.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The berm on the east side of the dam is very narrow and may not have been adequately
compacted. The work will strengthen this berm and reduce the risk of failure under large
storm events. We have records of the dam/berm being overtopped and out flanked in 1986.
Pnlllltinn'
The pond will be drawn down prior to the work and all the excavation will be done in the
dry. The disturbed area will, be stabilised,with seed,.'sod or mulch immediately following the
work.
Cnn~rv,.tinn nf Land'
This dam and pond has been identified as a fish barrier in the Rouge Fish Plan. Although
there is no opportunity at this time, both MNR and MTRCA staff discussed the long term
objective of removing fish barriers on the Rouge River with the owner.
B564 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
Baseflow will be maintained in the watercourse downstream before, during and following
construction.
Pnlir-y Gllirip.linA~'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 3.3 (Policies and Procedures for Identifying Watercourses
and Alterations)
CFN: 28134 Application II: 110196/WS
For information contact: Mary Asselatine (ext. 304)
Dete: 1996.10.24.
(7 4 1 R)ThA Spnrt~ CllJh~ nf Can::ld::l
To construct in the flood plain on Part Lot 1, Concession 3, (Valleywood Club, 7015
Leslie Street), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on property
owneo oy same.
The purpose is to construct a seasonal enclosure over an existing outdoor pool.
The permit will be issued from November 6, 1996 to November 5, 1998.
1) Red Une Revision, Site Plan Project Data, Valleywood Business Club; prepared by
Okun Arch. Inc.; Drawing SP1; revised and received October 18, 1996.
2) Site Plan, Foundation Plan, Elevations, The Valleywood Club, Pool Enclosure;
prepared by Argue and Assoc.; Drawings S 1 and S2; received November 1, 1996
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~l:
The Club is proposing to install a bubble, to be used seasonally, over an existing outdoor
pool. The pool is part of an organised recreational facility in the flood plain. The pool site is
immediately adjacent to the existing clubhouse structure, and does not extend closer to the
watercourse which is approximately 35 m away. Currently a chain link fence encircles the
pool.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnriing'
The depth of flooding at the site is approximately 1 m and the velocities approximately .7
m/s under Regional Storm conditions. The site is outside of the hydraulic flood way .
Although the enclosure cannot be dry flood proofed, the .bubble will be anchored down and
not dislodged in a flood event.
Pnlhltinn'
Sediment will not enter the watercourse as a result of this work.
cnn~p.rvatinn nf l::Inri'
There are no natural resource features on the site that will be affected by the installation of
the enclosure. The site is outside of the riparian area.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B565
Pnlir.y GlIidAlinA~'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
CFN: 28230 Application #:210/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary AsseIstine (Ext. 304)
OMe: 1996.10.24.
(7 4 1 Q)City nf Sr..arhnrnllgh
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 19, Concession 4, (west of Markham Road, south
of Nashdene Road), in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located
on property owned by same.
The purpose is to restore the channel banks that are eroding from overland flow.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998.
(1) Redline Revision Site Plan and Details for Channel Restoration, Highland Creek south
of Nashdine Road, City of Scarborough; prepared by applicant; received September
19, 1996. (Total Document - 11 plans)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~l:
Along a channelised section of the Malvern Branch of the Highland Creek, an adjacent large
parking lot is draining overland and causing significant erosion of the channel banks at eight
separate sites. The City is proposing to replace the material lost on the channel banks and
is considering reinforcing these areas with terrafix. At two of the sites, catchbasins and
sumps will be installed to collect the overland flow and discharge it to the watercourse.
The City is also considering an alternative drainage scheme for the parking lot to prevent
future erosion problems
Cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
The channel configuration will not be changed. There will be no impact on the control of
flooding.
Pnlllltinn'
Sediment fences will be installed to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse during
the work. All disturbed areas will be seeded, sodded or mulched immediately following
filling.
Cnn~p.rvatinn nf l::Ind'
There are no significant resource features on this site.
B566 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
Pnlir-v GlIidAlinAJ:'
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 3.3 Policies and Procedures for Identifying Watercourses
and Alterations.
CFN: 28188 Application #: 192/96/SCAR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, ext. 304
Date: 1996.10.28.
(7 4 ?O)u.nnard Nar-r..aratn
To construct in a flood plain and place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12,
Concession 5, (201 Main Street, Unionville), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct an addition to an existing commercial structure and a parking lot
in the Special Policy Area in Unionville.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998.
(1 ) Site Plan &. Elevations, 201 Main Street, Unionville; prepared by BNA Design;
Drawing 1 and 4; received October 24, 1996. (Total Plans 2)
(2) Landscape Plan, 201 Main St., Unionville; prepared by Landscape Planning Ltd.;
Project 96-42; Drawing L-1; received Oct. 23, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al :
A 88.2 m2 single storey addition is proposed to be added to an existing 127.3 m2 two
storey commercial structure. The property is located on the east side of Main Street within
the Special Policy Area of Unionville. The rear of the structure extends down the valley
slope. Landscaping and a 17 space parking lot are proposed on the valley floor.
The depth of flooding under Regional Storm conditions at the site of the addition is
approximately 1.3 m. There is a basement proposed under the addition which can not be
flood protected to the Regional Storm elevation because of requirements for fire safety;
however, it meets the minimum requirement of the 1 :350 storm. The finished floor
elevation of the first floor is above the flood plain elevation.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8567
Landscaping, including a walkway extends down the valley slope to the valley floor. The
proposed parking lot is to be constructed at grade and will be subject to up to 3.1 m of
flooding. This parking area is part of the municipal parking lot for the Village of Unionville
which was approved by the Authority in 1990. The design meets the storm water
management, flood plain management and corridor enhancement objectives as approved for
the original permit. Because of funding limitations, the parking lot was not constructed by
the Town, but is being constructed incrementally by the landowners as they apply to
redevelop. Easements and agreements are in place to allow for Authority or Municipality
access in case of a flood warning. In addition, the owner has agreed to allow the Town to
undertake any required modifications to this parking lot in the future so that the intent of a
consolidated municipal facility is realised.
Cnntrnl nf Flnntiing'
The proposal meets the criteria set out in OPA 100 for the Unionville Special Policy Area.
Pnlh Itinn'
This work is isolated from the watercourse by Old Kennedy Road and will not impact
pollution.
cnn~ArvAtinn nf L ::Inti.
The existing structure is located on the valley slope which is consistent with other
structures on Main Street along this reach. The existing slope is stable and will not be
affected by the addition. The parking lot does not impact the slope nor will it affect any
significant vegetation or habitats. The area is currently informally used as a parking lot.
Pnlir.y GllitiAlinA~'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.2.1 Development Guidelines for Development/
Redevelopment Within Designated Special Policy Areas, with the policies of OPA 100 (SPA
for Unionville) and the approval for the Unionville Parking Lot (February 1990).
CFN: Application #:217/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, &xt. 304
Date: 1996.10.28.
(7 4 ? 1 )TimA~ DAvAlnpmAnt Inr.
To alter a watercourse on Pt. Lot 9 and 10, Concession 2, (W. Beaver Creek Road
south of Hwy. #7), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
WITHDRAWN BY STAFF.
B568 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
(7 4 ??) LJninnvillA Wnnd~ I td
To place fill and alter a watercourse on Pt. Lot 10, Concession 6, (Meadowbrook
Lane), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to regrade and service a site within the Unionville Special Policy Area in
preparation for a townhouse development and to construct a storm outfall.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 2001.
(1 ) Meadowbrook Lane, Plan and Profile; prepared by Masonsong Atkari Ltd.; Project
96385; Drawing P1; received October 18, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
(2) Meadowbrook Lane, Grading Plan and Details; prepared by Masonsong Atkari Ltd.;
Project 96385; Drawings GR1 and D1; received November 7, 1996. (Total Plans 2)
(3) Meadowbrook Lane, Sediment Control Plan; prepared by Masongsong Atkari Ltd.;
Project 96385; Drawing S1; received November 6, 1996. (Total Plan 1)
(4) Meadowbrook Lane, Landscape Plan; prepared by D.W.K. Landscape Architect; Job
96-337; Drawing L2; received November 7, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~1 :
To facilitate the development of a small 30 unit townhouse development in the flood plain
of the Unionville Special Policy Area, the property is to be regraded and the storm sewer
system and outfall constructed. Storm water for the site is to be treated by storm septors.
The outlet will be directed down an embankment and outfall to an existing off-line wet area
which drains to the river.
cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
Filling and regrading is minimised and used only to achieve adequate drainage for the storm
water scheme. Details of the Townhouse structures are not available at this time and will
be subject to future review. Staff will ensure that these structures will be flood protected
pursuant to the requirements of the Special Policy Area policies.
Pnlhltinn'
A sediment fence will be installed around the perimeter of the townhouse site and the
outfall.
cnn~p.rvatinn nf Land'
The site of the townhouse development, the storm system and outfall are in an open field
area. All areas disturbed for the construction for the storm outfall will be restored with
native woody vegetation. The wet area at the outfall will provide some water quality
benefit and dissipate flows.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 B569
Pnliq Guidp-linp-~'
The proposal is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.2.1 Development Guidelines for Development/
Redevelopment within Designated Special Policy Areas and OPA 100 (Unionville Special
Policy Area).
CFN: 28229 Application #: 211/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, ext. 304
(7 4 ?~) Whitp-valp. Gnlf clllh
To construct within a flood plain on Part Lot 29, Concession 4, (2985 Golf Club
Road), in the Town of Pickering, Duffin Creek Watershed as located on property
owned by Ontario Land Corporation.
The purpose is to relocate an existing bridge by constructing a new temporary bridge 60
metres upstream on the Duffin Creek.
The permit will be issued from November 8, 1996 to November 7, 1998 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Location Map Detail Plan; prepared by Whitevale Golf Club; Drawing 1; received
September 19, 1996.(Total Plans 1)
(2) Bridge Construction Detail Plan; prepared by Whitevale Golf Club; Drawing 3;
received September 19, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
(3) Cart Path Cross Section Detail Plan; prepared by Whitevale Golf Club; Drawing 4;
received September 19, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
(4) Proposed bridge and Cart Path Detail Site Plan; prepared by Whitevale Golf Club;
Drawing 2; revised as received on October 31,1996. (Total Plans 1)
(5) Letter of Undertaking from Art Oswald, Green Superintendent, Whitevale Golf Club;
regarding the removal of the old bridge structure; as received October 31, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
PrnpnUlI:
The applicant proposes to replace an existing pedestrian bridge with a new temporary span
bridge. The temporary bridge will be located 60 metres upstream of the existing bridge site.
The bridge structure will be utilized during the golf season and removed during the winter
months. The bridge consists of two steel span sections supported by a crib structure placed
at the river's edge. The applicant is requesting approval.for .the structure which is partially
completed. The old bridge will be removed.
cnntrnl nf Flnnding'
There will be no additional impact on the control of flooding by the replacement bridge.
Pnllutinn'
Machinery used to secure and remove the steel sections when required will access the site
without interference with the watercourse.
B570 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996
Cnn~uuvatinn nf l::Ind'
The works are within an existing golf course. All disturbed areas will be rehabilitated in
accordance with details submitted by the applicant.
Pnlir..y GlJidAlinfl!~'
The works are in accordance with Section 4.2 - Existing Resource Based Uses of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28187 Application II: 191/96/P1CK
For information contact: Russel White (ext. 306)
Date: 1996.10.24.
RI;S .8169/9& - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE STATUS REPORT
September 1, 1996 Staff report on accounts receivable.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT the report on accounts receivable of the Authority, as of September 1, 1996, be
received. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
RI;S M8170/96- APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS
Request for approval of accounts for January to August, 1996.
Normally a request for approval would have been made at an earlier
point in the year, however, because of the intensive planning exercises
that have been underway, it has been delayed until now.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT upenditures for the months of January to August, 1996, in the amo&.wIt of
$19,816,800,-be approved. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/96, NOVEMBER 8, 1996 8571
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11: 15 a.m., November 8, 1996.
Rir.hard O'8riAn .J cr::lig MathAr
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/pl
~
, the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #11/96 Page B572
December 13, 1996
The Executive Committee met in the South Theatre, in the Visitor's Centre at Black Creek
Pioneer Village, on Friday, November 8, 1996. The Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the
meeting to order at 10:05 a.m.
PRESENT
Lorna Bissell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Michael Di Biase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Brian Harrison ................................................ Member
Lois Hancey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice Chair, Authority
Joan King ................................................... Member
Richard O'Brien ......................................... Chair, Authority
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard Whitehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
REGRETS
Lois Griffin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
RES. #8171/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #10/96, held November 8, 1996, be approved. .. CARRIED
8573 EXECUTIVE COMMI-n:-EE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
DELEGATIONS
(a) Ms. Patrica Foran, of Aird and Berlis, Barristers and Solicitors, representing Maple
Downs Golf and Country Club spoke in opposition of the staff recommendation
shown on page B586, under Res. #B189/96, regarding Maple Downs Golf and
Country Club - Minor Exception to the Region of York Trees By-law TR-1-91-154.
(b) Mr. Michael White of 587 North Lake Road, Richmond Hill, supported the staff
recommendtion shown on page B586, under Res. #B190/96, regarding Maple Downs
Golf and Country Club - Minor Exception to the Region of Y..:ok Trees By-law TR-1-
91-1 54.
RES. #8172/96 - DELEGATIONS
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Lorna Bissell
THAT the above delegations (a) and (b) be received. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #8173/96 - AUTHORITY GOVERNANCE REVIEW
At its meeting #4/96 held on August 23, 1996, t~e Conservation and
Related Land Management Advisory Board made r. recommendation to
the Executive Committee that a detailed governance review be initiated
and report back to the Authority.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lorna Bissell
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the current
govemance structure utilizing Advisory Boards and an Executive Committee be retained;
THAT there be no major changes to the roles and responsibilities of the Water and Related
and the Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Boards;
THAT the Terms of Reference for these Boards should be reviewed by the respective Board
and modifications made if required, to ensure they reflect the role of developing programs,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13,1996 B574
recommending strategic directions and monitoring the delivery and outcomes of programs
and projects that fall within the responsibilities of each Board:
THAT the Water and Related Land Management and the Conservation and Related Land
Management Advisory Boards be renamed the Watershed Management Advisory Board and
the Public Use Advisory Board respectively;
THAT the Finance and Administration Advisory Board's responsibilities be expanded to
include business development:
THAT the Finance and Administration Advisory Board be renamed the Finance and Business
Development Advisory Board and;
THAT the Terms of Reference for this Board be reviewed and modified to include this new
role;
THAT the Evaluation and Review Committee be disbanded and its responsibilities be placed
with the Executive Committee. It is also recommended that the Chief Administrative Officer
and Chair investigate mechanisms that provide opportunities for the discussion of strategic
issues among staff and Members and:
THAT the Chief Administrative Officer report back on how the program audit function
previously assigned to the Evaluation and Review Committee can be delivered through the
Executive Committee:
THAT changes to the role and mandate of the Executive Committee resulting from the
elimination of the Evaluation and Review Committee, and any changes to the Authority's
Rules of Conduct, be brought forward for approval as part of the new govemance structure;
AND FURTHER THAT a review of the Authority's membership, in accordance with the
population figures contained within the Conservation Authorities Act, be deferred until the
municipal structure within the GTA is determined. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board at its meeting #4/96 held
on August 23, 1996, received the report of the Black Creek Business Plan Sub-Committee
and made several recommendations related to the four recommendations contained in the
report.
One of these recommendations related to the need to review the governance structure of
the Authority. Specifically, Recommendation 3 states:
.The subcommittee recommends that a review of the roles and responsibilities
of Advisory Boards be initiated immediately and that a new system be devised
which decentralizes the governance process in an effort to streamline and
expedite operational decision making throughout the Authority..
B575 EXECUTIVE COMMI~EE#11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
The Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board took the following action
with respect to this recommendation:
"Res. #C 1 7/96
THA T Recommendation 3 of the Black Creek Pioneer Village Business Plan
Sub Committee Report regarding a review of the Authority's governance
structure be referred to the Executive Committee and;
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THA T a detailed
governance review be initiated and reported on as soon as possible".
At Executive Committee Meeting # 8/96, these recommendat .ns from the Advisory Board
were received by the Executive Committee and the following Resolution was passed:
"AMENDMENT
RES. # 130/96
That staff prepare a preliminary report of options and considerations for the
reorganization of the current Authority governance structure, and report back to the
next Executive Committee meeting".
The following report is in response to this direction:
PREVIOUS REVIEWS
There have been two reviews of the structure and membership of the Authority in the last
twelve years. The first of these was completed in 1984 and was carried out by the Chairs
of the three Regions and Metropolitan Toronto and is commonly known as the Kruger
Report.
This report made a number of recommendations related to reducing the size and changing
the committee structure of the Conservation Authority. These recommendations were
adopted and other than the elimination of the provincial members by the province through
Bill 26 in 1995 and some fine tuning done in 1991, the structure and membership remains
as recommended in the 1984 review.
A second review was undertaken in 1991, based on a request by the Minister of Natural
Resources. All conservation authorities were asked to review their size and structure with a
view to improving decision making. This request resulted in a staff report dated May, 1991.
This review recommended no further change to the Authority's membership but it did put
forward some governance structure options for the consideration of the Authority. These
options were reviewed by the Evaluation and Review Committee in June of 1991 and then
by the full Authority in October. There was no support for significant changes to the
number or role of the Advisory Boards, the Executive Committee and the full Authority.
Neither was there support to further reduce the Authority's membership.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B576
The current roles, responsibilities and structure, reflect the reorganization in 1984 and the
minor changes introduced in 1991.
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE OPTIONS
The 1991 review investigated various governance options. In keeping with the current
Executive direction, these and other options have been considered as part of this
governance review. The various options reviewed are outlined below.
A) NO ADVISORY BOARDS
This option would have all issues and reports going directly to the full
Authority. Because the items would not have been discussed at the Advisory
Board level, it would be reasonable to expect the meetings to last longer and,
potentially, a few more meetings might be required.
The Executive Committee would continue to function as it does now.
However, without the Advisory Boards, there would have to be a revised
electoral process to ensure the Executive had balanced municipal
representation.
B) COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
This option entails the use of the municipal Committee of the Whole concept.
This Committee made up of all of the Authority members, would meet before
or after each Authority meeting. Here items could be discussed in greater
detail and then recommendations from the Committee would be forwarded to
the next meeting of the Authority. The Executive Committee would
continue as it does now and, again, a revised electoral process would have to
be developed.
This would require all of the Authority members to meet more frequently.
C) EUMINA TION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
This option eliminates the Executive Committee and could be incorporated
within any of the other options considered. The more day-to-day
responsibilities currently administered by the Executive Committee, would
have to be delegated to either the appropriate Advisory Board or the full
Authority. The Conservation Authorities Act does not allow the delegation of
approvals pursuant to the Authority's Fill and Construction and Alteration to
Waterways Regulation other than an Executive Committee. Therefore, the
approval of permits under the Regulation, would have to be administered by
the full Authority. This normally would not be too onerous, however, in the
event of a hearing, this could be quite difficult to administer when utilizing the
full Authority. Some other Authorities do use this process.
B577 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
D) ADVISORY BOARD MODEL (STATUS QUO)
This option would see no major changes to the existing size, structure and
reporting relationships. Housekeeping matters related to the mandates of the
various Boards would be useful however.
DISCUSSION OF THE OPTIONS
There are many permutations and combinations to the options listed above, however, these
are the basic models and each has its benefits and drawbacks.
The selection of the appropriate model, must take into account these basic principles:
1. The Authority is a public body and its meetings must be open, accessible and the
decision making process must be transparent.
2. The governance structure must not only facilitate decision making, but allow for
ample opportunity for both public and Member debate.
3. Since the Members have other responsibilities, it is important that the governance
structure promotes active Member involvement and participation and provides the
opportunity for Members to develop an understanding of the issues and the operation
of the Authority.
4. Given the large number of Members and recognizing the interests and expertise of
the Members will vary, it is useful if the structure allows members to participate
more fully in their areas of interest. This encourages greater Member interest and
participation.
5. Given the Members' busy schedules and their other responsibilities, the structure
must ensure the business of the Authority is carried out in an efficient and timely
manner. Very long meetings would limit the full participation of many Members.
When the models presented are tested against these basic principles, it is my opinion that
the Advisory Board model continues to be the best fit. This model provides the opportunity
for substantial review and discussion of issues by both the Members and the public. It
provides the opportunity for a portion of the membership to become better acquainted with
the issues and work of the Authority within the purview of each Board. It allows for
detailed discussion at the Boards and by dividing up the work, does not require a large time
commitment by the members on anyone day.
The Executive Committee and its delegated responsibilities plays an important role in
ensuring the smooth running of the Authority, as it deals with both routine and urgent
matters. It also deals with the approval of permits under the Authority's Fill and
Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation. The Executive Committee also sits as
a quasi judicial body when it deals with an application under the Regulations where an
applicant requests a Hearing. There are certain rules around how these hearings are run and
these would be difficult to administer with a large body like the full Authority. Maintaining
the Executive Committee ensures the full Authority spends its time effectively and allows
for greater flexibility.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/96, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B578
RECOMMENDATION
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the current govemance structure
utilizing Advisory Boards and an Executive Committee be retained.
REVIEW OF THE ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ADVISORY BOARDS
Based on the premise that the current structure is the most effective and therefore the most
desirable, the remaining part of this report reviews in more detail the role and responsibilities
of the Advisory Boards, as suggested by the Black Creek Business Plan Sub-Committee.
The issue that led the Black Creek Business Plan Sub-Committee to recommend that a
review of the roles and responsibilities of the Advisory Boards take place, related to their
desire to streamline and focus decision making. The Sub-Committee's opinion was that in
order for the Village to make the necessary shifts to become more self sufficient, a speedier
decision making process was required.
Their report suggested more delegated decision making powers to the Conservation and
Related Land Management Advisory Board and greater empowerment to staff. Conceptually
their model had the Authority approving annual operating plans and auditing the results at
the end of the year, while the Advisory Board would monitor performance during the year
and approve any significant changes to the operating plan. Staff's responsibility in this
model, would be to make all operating decisions which were in accordance with the
operating plan. This model would reduce the need to seek Board and Authority approval for
those things deemed to be day to day operating decisions.
The sub-committee suggested this review should not be limited to the Village and the Land
Management Advisory Board, for similar issues would exist for the other Boards and
business units of the Authority. This resulted in their recommendation to review the roles
of all Boards.
COMMENTS
It is my view, that the roles of staff, the Boards and the Authority, already reflect the model
suggested by the Black Creek Business Plan Sub-Committee. I believe the concerns
expressed by the sub-committee are legitimate, but relate more to how we as staff use the
Board, than to a flaw in the governance structure. If we are using the Boards to approve
items that are really day to day operational decisions, it is not because their Terms of
Reference require this be done, but rather it is how staff have chosen to use the Boards.
This wastes time, shifts accountability from staff and reduces the interest of the Board
Members, who may feel their time and effort could be better spent elsewhere.
Using the Boards more in keeping with their stated Terms of Reference and ensuring the
Members are being involved in broad corporate priority and objective setting, is critical to
the success of the Authority. It is vital that the Boards are involved at the appropriate times
and at the appropriate level of detail.
B579 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
The role of the Executive Committee, the Advisory Boards and the Authority are set out in
very broad terms, in the Rules for the Conduct of the Authority. For example, the
Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board's mandate is described as
follows:
" ...... Board shall consider and make recommendations to the Authority on all
matters relating to the conservation and related land management programs
of the Authority."
More specific terms of reference have also been adoPted by the Authority for each Board.
Again, using the Land Board example the terms of reference are defined as:
TERMS OF REFERENCE
Conservation anc Related Land Management Advisory Board_
To initiate, stuCy, report on, and recommend a comprehensive program of land management
in the regions under the jurisdiction of the Authority and, without restricting the foregoing,
the specific Terms of Reference shall include:
. policy, program, and project development in the area of community relations,
watershed recreation, and heritage conservation;
. planning and site development of all Authority-operated public use facilities;
. marketing of revenue-producing facilities, including the conservation areas,
Black Creek Pioneer Village, and the Kortright Centre for Conservation;
. development and implementation of a comprehensive public information
program for watershed residents, Authority members, municipal and provincial
elected officials and staff, and specific target groups, on all aspects of the
Authority's programs;
. operations and maintenance of Authority facilities, including the provision of
visitor services, safety and security;
. preparation of agreements related to the development, management or
operation of any component of the Authority's land resource by other public
or private interests;
. development, operation, and maintenance of Black Creek Pioneer Village in
conformity with accepted museum standards.
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/96, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B580
In my view, these terms of reference define the role of the Board as one of recommending
broad plans and programs to the Authority, recommending changes and monitoring
performance. Its role is clearly not one of managing day to day operating decisions. Other
than requiring the Board to recommend to the Authority, their responsibilities are similar to
those recommended by the Black Creek Business Plan Sub-Committee.
The responsibilities of staff are to implement the plans and programs as approved and are
held accountable for their delivery. Day to day decisions do not need to be brought to the
Board. Staff are governed by budget and various corporate policies. The accountability of
staff for the performance of their responsibilities and the delivery of programs assigned to
them, is clearly understood and is part of their performance review.
With the exception of the Finance and Administration Advisory Board, the names of the
other two Boards were developed to reflect the funding categories used by the province
some time ago. Although the names had some relevance at the time, this is no longer the
case, as these categories are no longer used by the province. The names are also very
cumbersome and do not define their responsibilities, nor do they reflect the business of the
Authority as currently defined in the recently adopted Three Year Business Plan. It is
recommended therefore, that the Advisory Boards be renamed to better reflect their
responsibilities.
Suggested names for the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board and the
Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board are the Watershed
Management Advisory Board and the Public Use Advisory Board respectively. The Finance
and Administration Advisory Board will be dealt with in the next section.
RECOMMENDATION
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT there be no major changes to the roles
and responsibilities of the Water and Related and the Conservation and Related Land
Management Advisory Boards;
THAT the Terms of Reference for these Boards should be reviewed by the respective Board
and modifications made if required, to ensure they reflect the role of developing programs,
recommending strategic directions and monitoring the delivery and outcomes of programs
and projects that fall within the responsibilities of each Board;
AND FURTHER THAT the Water and Related Land Management and the Conservation and
Related Land Management Advisory Boards be renamed the Watershed Management
Advisory Board and the Public Use Advisory Board respectively.
B581 EXECUTIVE COMM~E #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION ADVISORY BOARD
In the 1991 review, some minor changes were made to the role of the Finance and
Administration Advisory Board. These were to eliminate the duplication that existed
between the Board and the Executive Committee.
A major component of the Authority's Three Year Business Plan 1997 - 1999, is the
commitment to generate a considerable amount of revenue from our existing land holdings.
These revenues are separate from our revenue targets for our public use facilities such as
the Conservation Areas, Black Creek Pioneer Village and our education facilities such as
Kortright. These facilities will be looking for revenue opportunities through their
programming and will be administered through the new Public Use Board.
A staff structure has also been set up to search out revenue opportunities from our other
land holdings. A business development officer position has been created and this position's
responsibilities relate to seeking partnership opportunities, lease arrangements, special
events and some types of sponsorships. Our Property Department staff are also quite
involved in this work.
Due to the importance of g'enerating revenue from these non traditional sources, it is
suggested that the Finance and Administration Advisory Board's responsibilities be
expanded to include business development. This would support the staff focus on this area
and provide much needed political input to the many ventures that will arise through this
work. This will also provide an opportunity for Members, with particular expertise in these
areas, to become more actively involved.
It is recommended as well, to better reflect this added responsibility, that it be renamed the
Finance and Business Development Advisory Board. In order to implement this new role, the
Board should review and update its Terms of Reference as soon as possible.
RECOMMENDATION
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Finance and Administration
Advisory Board's responsibilities be expanded to include business development;
THAT the Finance and Administration Advisory Board be renamed the Finance and Business
Development Advisory Board and;
THAT the Terms of Reference for this Board be reviewed and modified to include this new
role.
EVALUATION AND REVIEW COMMITTEE
In 1987, by Resolution #128, the Authority established a special committee known as the
Evaluation and Review Committee. The membership of this Committee consisted of the
Vice-Chair of the Authority, each Board Chair and such other members of the Executive
Committee as are necessary to ensure adequate representation from all constituent member
municipalities. The Chair of the Authority is an ex officio member.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13,1996 B582
The purpose of the Committee was "to evaluate annually, the Authority's programs and
objectives in relation to the goals and future direction of the Authority, and to receive the
annual program performance review conducted by staff'". This Committee was to report to
the Executive Committee at least on an annual basis.
Over the past five years or so, this Committee has met very infrequently and has not met
over the last two years. The membership of the Committee reflects very closely that of the
Executive Committee and in fact the last few meetings of this Committee, have involved the
entire Executive Committee. In reality therefore, the Evaluation and Review Committee
duplicates the Executive Committee. Items that would have been taken to the Evaluation
and Review Committee for recommendation to the Executive Committee, have been taken
directly to the Executive Committee rather than call a separate meeting.
The Evaluation Committee was established to provide an opportunity for staff and members
to discuss issues which are more strategic in nature. I believe this is something we need to
spend more time on as we plan for the challenges ahead. The importance of having an
opportunity for staff to discuss strategic issues with Authority members can not be
underestimated in these very difficult times. Mechanisms should be found to facilitate
opportunities for discussion.
The Evaluation and Review Committee also performed an audit function. Its role was not to
do financial audits but more of a program audit. Our three year business plan for 1997 to
1999, has set specific targets for revenue generation, attendance, product delivery
standards and so on. These must be evaluated on at least a yearly basis. This type of
evaluation would include not only a financial review related to our revenue targets but
would also look at how effectively we delivered the program; Le., is the program still valid
and did we add value.
Staff should report back on a process for carrying out this evaluation function through the
Executive Committee.
RECOMMENDATION
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Evaluation and Review Committee
be disbanded and its responsibilities be placed with the Executive Committee. It is also
recommended that the Chief Administrative Officer and Chair investigate mechanisms that
provide opportunities for the discussion of strategic issues among staff and Members;
AND FURTHER THAT the Chief Administrative Officer report back on how the program audit
function previously assigned to the Evaluation and Review Committee can be delivered
through the Executive Committee.
B583 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Based on the preceding recommendations, the role of The Executive Committee would
change slightly. Changes to the mandate of the Executive Committee, if any, should be
brought forward for approval.
Staff have also reported on the desirability of implementing some administrative changes to
the role of the Executive Committee, regarding the issuance of permits under the
Authority's Fill and Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation. These
amendments, if adopted, would streamline the approval process for various minor types of
permits, reduce paperwork and staff time and improve our customer service. These
changes w.i11 be the subject of a subsequent staff report and are not considered to be
relevant to the governance issues discussed in this report.
RECOMMENDATION
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT changes to the role and mandate of the
Executive Committee resulting from the elimination of the Evaluation and Review
Committee, and any changes to the Authority's Rules of Conduct, be brought forward for
approval as part of the new govemance structure.
AUTHORITY MEMBERSHIP
In a staff report to Authority meeting # 12/95, held January 26, 1996, the issue of the
number of municipally appointed members was discussed. The Authority by Res. #302/95
referred the matter of membership to the Finance and Administration Advisory Board.
The issue relates to Section 2(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act which outlines the
requirements for municipal membership on an authority based on population. Because of
the growth within the Regions of Peel, York and Durham and the membership allowed for by
the Act, the Authority's membership could increase by 10 members over the current 28
members today.
Staff noted in their report, that increasing the size of the Authority at this time would be
contrary to the current trend of decreasing memberships on Boards, Age~ ':ies, Commissions
and even Councils. Also given the potential changes regarding municipal governments
within the GT A, it would seem to be premature to change the current membership at this
time. Once decisions are made with respect to the municipal structure within the GT A, our
membership should be reviewed.
RECOMMENDATION
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a review of the Authority's
membership, in accordance with the population figures contained within the Conservation
Authorities Act, be deferred until the municipal structure within the GTA is determined.
Report prepared by:
J. Craig Mather, ext. 240
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B584
RES. #B174/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Site Services - Sanitary and Water
Award of a contract for sanitary and water site services at the Don
Valley Brick Works.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Tender Opening Sub-Committee Report
#45/96 dated November 22, 1996, on the sanitary and water site services work quotations
be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be advised to award the contract for the installation of sanitary
and water services at the Don Valley Brick Works site to Drainstar Contracting Ltd. for the
amount of $164,532.50 (excluding GST), with a contingency of $35,000 for unknown
underground conditions resulting in a total contract cost of $199,532.50 (excluding GST).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This contract is for the installation of sanitary and water services from the City of Toronto
to the Don Valley Brick Works site. Contractors experienced in this type of work were pre-
qualified by the project construction manager and staff. The results of the tender process
are:
Contractor Bids
Bess-Con Construction Ltd. $225,254.00
Crown Drain Corporation Declined
Drainstar Contracting Ltd. $164,532.50
Principal Sewer & Watermain Co. Ltd. $288,180.00
RM Construction Declined
Rutherford Contracting Ltd. $247,677.00
RATIONALE
The quotations were reviewed in detail by staff and the construction management team and
were deemed correct and complete. A contingency was included in the contract cost to
address unknown subsurface conditions along the service route.
Based on this review, staff recommend that the lowest quotation received be accepted.
B585 EXECUTIVE COMM~E#11I96, DECEMBER 13, 1996
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the work are available in account 113-30-344. Funding for the Don Valley Brick
Works Project is provided by Metropolitan Toronto, the Province of Ontario, and The
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
For information contact:
Nick Saccone (ext. 301) or Adele Freeman (ext. 238)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13,1996 B586
RES. #8175/96 - MTRCA 40th ANNIVERSARY/CORPORATE EVENTS
To consider ways of promoting the Authority's 40th Anniversary and to
improve corporate events in 1997.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Joan King
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed
to identify sources of funding and incorporate the opening of the -William Granger
Greenway. into a June event; and
THAT the Service Recognition Awards for members, and gold awards for staff with 25
years, be presented at the Annual Meeting; and
THAT, in celebration of 40 years of conservation, the Authority offer to plant a tree for each
of its member municipalities (local and regional) in front of their City Hall; and
AND FURTHER THAT arrangements be made to provide an opportunity for the Authority
member(s) from each area to assist the Mayor/Chair with the tree planting. . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Recognition and Employee Suggestion Award Committee, with the addition of a number
of Authority members and staff, met on November 22, 1996. Their purpose was to
consider ways of promoting the Authority's 40th Anniversary and to improve corporate
events in 1997. A copy of the minutes of their meeting is appended to this report.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The proposals recommended by the Committee combine certain events to offset the cost of
new initiatives. The cost and potential sources of funding for trail development will be
determined by staff before proceeding with implementation.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Staff will prepare a plan for the implementation of the recommendations and will identify all
other opportunities to highlight 1997 as the Authority's 40th year in the business of
conservation.
For information contact:
Alyson C. Deans, ext. 269
B587 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE#11J96, DECEMBER 13,1996
RECORD OF MEETING -
REGARDING THE AUTHORITYS 40TH ANNNERSARY
i
I
. Participants: Pabick Ab1an, Randy Barber, Bob Burchett. A1yson Deans. Leis Hancey, I
I
Joanne Jeffery, Paula Leggieri, Kaye MacDonald. Dick O'Brien, Donna I
i
Patterson, Waneeta RObertson, Eugenia Sagardia, Madelyn Webb, I
Debbie Webster, Andy Wickens. and Gary Wilkins I
Location: Black Creek Pioneer Village Boardroom
Date and Time: Friday, November 22. 1996. at 8:30 a.m.
,
Purpose: To disc1Jss different ways of promoting the Authority's 40th Anniversary !
.
and incorcoratinq this milestone into our events. I
Introductlon I
!
I
Staff provided an overview of ttle purpose of ttle meeting and invited those in attendance to !
share their ideas and put forward any suggestions regarding the Authority's 40th Anniversary ;
and how it can tie in with seme of our corporate events. induding the Annual Meeting, Arbor
Day, and the presentation of Service Recognition Awards.
The Committee agreed to ttle following objectives for 1997:
1. Promotion of 1997 as ttle Authority's 40th Anniversary.
2. Recognition of the contribution of former Chair, William Granger.
3. Improvements to specific corporate events, induding the Annual Meeting, Arbor
Day, and the Service Recognition Awards presentations.
Prooosed Granger Trail
Staff made a presentation regarding the proposed "Granger Trail," which will be that segment
of the Interregional Trail from the McMichael Canadian Art Collection to the Vaughan
Community Centre (five kilometres). A map of the proposed trail location, along with slides,
were shown. Staff outlined ttlree options:
1. A hiking trail, .S metres wide, with bridges/catwalks that would need to be installed.
Cost ............................................................ $20,000
2. A walking trail, 1.5 metres wide, with bridgeS/catwalks that would need to be installed.
Cost ................................................... sao,ooo - $100,000
3. A 3-metre wide trail, with limestone screenings. abutments. and flood proof bridges.
Cost ........................................................... $700,000
.../2
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B588
-2-
This trail could be a future loop between the Konright Cemnt trails and ttle Interregional Trail.
Representatives from the McMichael Canadian Art Collection have ecpress8d an interest in the
project. and there have been seme preliminary discussions with the CIty of Vaughan. It was
suggested that community groups. ratepayers (KARA), ate. could maintain the trail.
The Committee agreed that ttle Trail was an appropriate WFri in which to acknowledge ttle
contribution of former Chair, William Granger.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Donna Patterson
THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT staft be directed to Identify sources of funding
and incorporate the opening of the "WIlliam Granger Greenway" into a June evenL
40th Anniversarv of the Authorttv
It was suggested that we promote the Authority's 40th Anniversary atlocaJ or community events
within the Authonty's jurisdiction. Our audience is our communities. We should use our 40th
Anniversary to launch the next 40 years - reinforce and cultivate.
It was agreed that we need to develop a logo fer all communications. and several options were
presented and discussed. It could be used on envelopes and letterhead. or stickers could be
added to existing stationery. folders, etc. The Foundation could add a byline to their next
printing of letterhead and envelopes. The logo and slogan could be made as an electronic file
that could be easily accessed by all staff.
The Committee discussed the fact that not many people know what a watershed is, and several
suggestions were made regarding an appropriate slogan.
~ 40 Years of Caring for Our Environment
~ Cleaner Water, Greener Land
~ Making Your Community Cleaner and Greener
It was also suggested that several banners be prepared with the logo and slogan. They should
be made available to Authority staff for use at events, plantings. etc. A 40th Anniversary display
will also be required.
Members of the Committee agreed on one of the sample logos, which should include the dates,
and discussed a series of words that could be used as the arch rather than a slogan - words
that represent what the Authority does.
Smaller banners or signs could also be added to existing Authority signs and at all gatehouses.
We need to involve staff and members and get them excited about these ideas - it's good for
morale.
...13
\
\
/
B589 EXECUTIVE COJ&1ITTEE .., 1196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
-
-3-
Another idea was that we give sam8ttling to everyone born in 1957, or perhaps a week (or a
month) could be promoted at the Authority's facilities. and everybody who is 40 years old would
r&ceive hot dogs, pop, and admission at 1957 prices.
An animated video with a conservation/environment message could possibly be produced in
conjunction with a Community College and sent to television SIaIians as a PSA. Madelyn Webb
has a contact at a professional animation studio, but we WCluld have to organize ttle creative
idea first (this would involve an ad agency). This idea WCluld require new funding or a sponsor
Cld may not be feasible given current resources and other SPonsorship initiatives.
Annual Meetlno
The Annual Meeting would provide the perfect -kick-off" klrthe 40th Anniversary. We should do
a release profiling our 40 years of conservation - ftnd out the data of ttle ftrst Authority meeting
and issue a release on that date.
A slide presentation should be prepared for the Annual Meeting, highlighting the Auttlority's 40
years. This could then be made into a video for distribution.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: PatrickAbtan
THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Service Recognition Awerds for members,
and gold awards for staff with 25 years, be presented at the Annual Meeting Instead of at
the Garden Party/Breakfast at the end of June.
Arbor Dav . Honour Roll Awards
Traditionally, this was an event to recognize individualS/corporations who contributed to the
aims and objectives of the Auttlority, but attendance has been dropping off for the last several
years. It was noted that many of the members are not aware of the importance of this event,
and, therefore, there wasn't the interest to take part in the program.
It was suggested was that we involve groups of youngsters, perhaps environment or geography
dubs. We could let schools in our area know that this is going on by sending a package of
information to the heads of geography departments.
Moved by: Donna Patterson
Seconded by: Patrick Abtan
THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT, In celebration of 40 years of conservation, the
Authority plant a tree for each of Its member munlclpallUes (local and regional) In front of
their City Hall, and
.../4
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE...1196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B590
-
-
-4-
THAT anangementa be mad. tD pravId. an appcntUnIty forth. Authority rnemb.r(s) tram
uch ... to .....1M II8yor/Chalr with 1M tree planting.
Conclusion
The meeting adjourned at 10:00 a.m.
/ .--
.' /
/
~
B591 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
RES. #8176/96 - THE TOWN OF AJAX
Request for permanent easement for a sanitary sewer south of Bayly
Street, east of Church Street, Town of Ajax, CFN #22913. Receipt of a
request from the Town of Ajax to provide a permanent easement for a
sanitary sewer located south of Bayly Street, east of Church Street,
Town of Ajax, Duffin Creek Watershed.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT
WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a
request from the Town of Ajax to provide a permanent easement for a sanitary sewer, to
assist in the development of Kennedy House Youth Services Inc. facility. in the vicinity of
Bayly Street and Church Street. Town of Ajax;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the
Authority in furthering its objectives. as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act. to cooperate with the Town of Ajax in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 2.056 acres. more or less. be granted to the Town
of Ajax for the proposed sanitary sewer. said land being Part of Lots 13 and 14. Range 3.
Broken Front Concession. Town of Ajax. Regional Municipality of Durham:
THAT the Authority request approval of the Ministry of Natural Resources to grant the
easement across the subject land on the following terms and conditions;
(a) The consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00 plus all legal, survey and other
costs incurred to complete the transaction;
(b) Prior to commencing construction. a full archaeological review including any
mitigation measures deemed necessary. is to be carried out all at the cost of the
Town of Ajax. to the satisfaction of the Authority's archaeological staff;
(c) All construction is to be carried out in accordance with plans to be approved by the
Authority's technical staff and all permits required under Ontario Regulation 158 are
to be issued prior to commencing construction;
(d) The Town of Ajax is to fully indemnify and absolve the Authority. from any and all
claims of any nature resulting in any way from the granting of the easement or the
carrying out of construction;
(e) Any additional concems as are deemed appropriate by the Authority's solicitors;
continued.. .
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B592
THAT said easement be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21 (2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Meeting #6/95, dated July 28, 1995, the Authority adopted resolutions #A 165/95 and
#A 166/95 directing staff to enter into discussions with the Town of Ajax, the Region of
Durham and Hi-Rise Structures Inc., regarding the possible acquisition of a 10 acre parcel of
land at the foot Harwood Avenue in the Town of Ajax.
In order to help with the acquisition of the Hi-Rise Structure Inc, property, which has now
been acquired by the Town, Town officials entered into a separate land exchange
agreement, approved through By-Law Number 141-95, December 11, 1995 with Kennedy
House Youth Services Inc. Under this agreement The Kennedy House Youth Services Inc.
detention facility, currently located in the vicinity of Ravenscroft and Rossland Roads, would
relocate to a 12 acre parcel of land owned by the Town on Church Street and the Town
would acquire approximately 23 acres from Kennedy House Youth Services Inc. Included in
the exchange is approximately 11 acres of valley land on Duffin Creek that will come into
public ownership. It was proposed to use the balance of the former Kennedy House lands to
help with the acquisition of the Hi-Rise Structure Inc. property.
Through the negotiations between the Town of Ajax and Kennedy House Youth Services
Inc. the Town has agreed to provide servicing to the relocated facility. The Town reviewed a
number of options for providing sanitary servicing and concluded that constructing a sewer
across Authority lands to the trunk sewer and pumping station on Duffin Creek at Bayly
Street was the most feasible. As a result the Town has requested the Authority to provide
an easement for the construction and maintenance of the sanitary sewer.
The subject lands were acquired from Avondale Construction on March 15, 1963, and from
Slough Estates Limited on October 18, 1968, under the Duffin Creek Flood Plain lands
component of the Land Acquisition Project. These lands were identified as part of the
Duffin Marsh ESA in 1982. They consist of regenerating "old field" vegetation communities
which on their own are not considered significant. However, they do provide habitat for
various species inhabiting the area. Staff feel that with proper site plan controls and
implementation of a restoration plan, that the impacts on the ESA will be minimal.
In accordance with Authority policy, an archaeological assessment will be undertaken,
including subsequent mitigation measures, if required.
In addition to the permanent easement rights being granted, the Town of Ajax will also be
utilizing certain additional Authority-owned lands in this area, for temporary construction
purposes.
.
B593 EXECUTIVE COMMITIEE#11I96, DECEMBER 13,1996
Work to be Done
To facilitate the property closing requirements between Kennedy House and Ajax, which is
scheduled for December 17, 1996, it is important for the Authority to approve the
recommendations within the time limitations.
The archaeological review has been commenced with the concurrence of Ajax.
The servicing corridor could potentially be the alignment for the Duffin's Marsh trail and
connection to the existing Waterfront trail in Ajax-Pickering.
Ajax will also be obtaining all permits required under Ontario Regulation 1 58 prior to
constru ction.
Financial
The Town of Ajax has agreed to pay for the archaeological review and any mitigation
measures. The Town will also be responsible for all restoration to the servicing easement.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
Report prepared by: Ron Dewell, Extension 245
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 111196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B594
MTRCA / AJAX EASEMENT
-
BAYL Y 51.
.
I
'1
~r
(fll
:%:1
(JI
a:1
;:)1
J:I
(JI
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
-
\
'-
.1
A1JTlo4ORITY LMlOS
TOWN 01" ~
LNlOS CONVEYED ~
TO I<ENHEOY HOUSE
YOUTH SERVlc:tS INC.
PROPOSED
EAS'"~ENT -----........
LOCATION
E.5.A. BOUNDMY -----..
lAKCONr
:AU 4910 -
-
. - - . - - -
- -- -
B595 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE *11196, DECEMBER 13,1996
RES. #8177/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
Flood Plain Component, Humber River Watershed
Hugh and Janetta Bailey Property, CFN #28045. Purchase of a partial
taking, located on the west side of Weston F. ~ad, south of Sheppard
Avenue, in the City of North York.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 2 acres, more or less, consisting of an
irregular shaped parcel of vacant land, being a partial taking from a larger residential holding,
be purchased from Hugh and Janetta Bailey, said land being Lot of 14, Concessions 5 .. 6,
west of Yonge Street and part of road allowance between Concessions 5 .. 6, City of
North York, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, fronting on the west side of Weston
Road, south of Sheppard Avenue;
THAT the purchase price be $51,250.00 inclusive of the vendors' legal costs and the
installation of a chain link fence between the property being conveyed and the property
being retained;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject
to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A 131/95, Authority Meeting #4/95, May 26, 1995, approving the project.
The offer at hand is in accordance with the appraised value range of an independent
evaluation obtained by the Authority.
Negotiations have been conducted with J. I. Johnston, Johnston Douglas Senn, Barristers
and Solicitors, representatives of the owners.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8596
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition. It is
part of the flood plain of the Humber River, is adjacent to other Authority and publicly
owned lands and and the acquisition will help consolidate public ownership in this reach of
the Humber River and provide long term protection. It is adjacent to the LundlRossiter
property approved for acquisition by the Authority at Meeting #10196, dated November 22,
1996.
It is also one of the parcels of land that the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, Parks and
Culture Department, identified as being very important to their open space needs and had
requested the Authority to attempt to acquire. At Meeting #10/95 the Authority adopted
Resolution #A260/95 as follows:
THA T the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be requested to confirm the funding
identified in the 1995-1999 Capital Works Programme under Metro Parks and Culture is
available on the following basis:
i) $500,000. in 1995 to assist in the purchase of Milne Hollow (Markovic Property);
ii) A maximum of $500,000. in 1996 to assist in the purchase of high priority
Mid and North Humber Valleylands;
THA T the Authority attempt to match up to $500,000. that The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto is providing for the acquisition of the Mid and North Humber
Valleylands.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The lands will be turned over to the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto under our
management agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto has approved funding to a maximum of $500,000.
for the mid and north Humber Valleylands. Expenditures involving the municipal share is
subject to approval of the Commissioner of Finance and the Deputy Commissioner of Parks
and Culture. The Authority's share will be raised through land sales. Funding for this
acquisition will be charged to account 004-11-502.
Report prepared by:
Ron Dewell, Extension 245
For information contact:
Ron Dewell, Extension 245
Don Prince, Extension 221
B597 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
, -
, . .'
.
-'
,."
.,-
-
....
...
AUTHORITY LAN" 3
/L SUBJECT LANDS
-a," ...
CITY OF NORTH , ri-:::.:.., ~ . I
YORK LANDS I J' - --.-
j r. -" r: ! ~ :
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B598
RES. #8178/96 - ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, 37 Storer Drive, City of North
York, CFN# 23050
Request from the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto to terminate an
existing encroachment agreement and enter into a new encroachment
agreement relating to the sale of 37 Storer Drive, City of North York.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Authority concur with the following
action taken by The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto relating to 37 Storer Drive, City of
North York:
(1) Terminating the existing encroachment agreement between The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto and Diane Celotti. the outgoing owner and vendor of the
property at 37 Storer Drive. City of North York. subject to the purchaser assuming
the obligations under the current encroachment agreement and entering into a new
encroachment agreement;
(2) Entering into an encroachment agreement with Auday and Samantha Jacques, the
purchasers of the property at 37 Storer Drive. City of North York, based on the same
or similar terms as the existing encroachment agreement.
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority meeting #7/92 held on August 21,1992 under Res. #127, the Authority
concurred with The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto entering into an encroachment
agreement with Diane Celotti the owner of 37 Storer Drive as a means of resolving
encroachment related concerns.
This agreement related to Part of Block A, Plan M-928 and contains an area of 2400 square
feet,more or less. The encroachment consists of a portion of an inground pool, a metal
shed and chain link fence. The agreement was completed by the Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto and registered on June 30, 1993, with a commencement date of
August 1, 1992.
B599 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE#11J96, DECEMBER 13,1996
The property is in the process of being sold and the purchaser has requested the opportunity
to enter into a new agreement similar to the existing agreement.
The transfer of the encroachment agreement has been recommended by the Corporate
Administration Committee to the Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for
consideration on December 4, 1996. Results of Metro Council's deliberations on this item
will be available at the Executive Committee meeting on December 13, 1996.
The sale from Diane Celotti to Auday and Samantha Jacques is scheduled for completion on
December 20, 1996.
Report prepared by:
Michael Fenning, ext. 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8600
- . ..
\
.. ~h.oi"l. "e"
\
_Ie ~ te
. ... , G')
'" .
-=- 6 .
Il :&
-J
JI
----- -:
. '\
,
!
:i.
J
11
~
~ MTRCA LANDS
i ...
Ii Ie. ~
I f
.' .. -
.. ~ ~ i
.. ~ '-
~ Q:
z ~
-
,
!:! ......,
'i Q
~ L&J
a:
~
en
fB
a:
~ ~ METRIC:
-...
~~ lISrMtC1!3 SHOWN aN'lMlS 'UN AIlE NII!1lll!3 ANO
:@1 9 CAN IE lDN!Inm 1UPKT trr lIMOlNG I'f Go 504.
Ji
PlAN OF SURVEY OF PART OF BLOCK A, LEGEND
. ----
REGISTERED PlAN M-928,CITY OF NORTH YORK, a ---...
. ---
- ----
MUNICIPAUlY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO. ---
_._~
__fUlI.._
SCAL! ' . .. .' 2I:D 1111 --..-
BEARING MarE
IUINIS ME IISnDCIIIC MClAll! ~ 'ltl ~
SImt-!ASTIIlU I.MT rllm' 13 AS SHOWN aN PUIH
II1ZI_A KMIIG rI....S 45"E
----- J. K. YCUNG COMPANY LTD.
~ c:a.am. 1'lOfSS10HAI. lMIl 9JRVDtlRS 91286
==':::'':ic.~ I7CXl WI\..SCP< '""VUE:. c:ooo.svIEW Otr. I13L 182 eelSl 241.973'
.~"'t... 4.~c:...._...,.. ......~...._.,._ _"_"__"_'.-"'~___._...___ ____ ......_ _
8801 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.-t1196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
.~. ..., ':"-'~d
~. Q ~ND ~~,~
~:J HI..I.UN Jae;Cll ~ !oS ...ilIm sa..
SI:'_ ~ Z!Ira Rr_ --= '"'
~an:r.:c. ON WN XI
... ...... =. (.s.11) 3lIZ-
==-- ;..~ (4~1) ~
....... .........
.:_~ --
.
oaao.r2l, ,_
TO: ~~~~Ic......6.
-
FROM: c.......oiwiw._ <<~and""'-' ~
SUBJECT: '11!IWlNA'T1ON OF !NCRCACHMerT AGReterr NfO NI!W eNCR~
AGRE5MENr I.ANCSATiHE REAR OF7T STORER DRIVE. CZT'1' OF NORni YORK
!lI:I:mI:
To ~ ~...,odIbn at Ute eIb:tIng .na.....l..._41G1'a-._4 wiIIIltle u.:.-. lIle _ 8Ild
""c7T Sll:lrwenv.. aycrtNantlycn. __lD -"'~""'lIle ~under
Ute carrwlt .~ aQrMm..1l .a lD ... inlD .... -_.....lm..4 ~ with Ute IWW
~ of-:r1 SIDrw CJ-.
lKundInn ~ fl'n8nei1tf lm!X1cM1o,,~ and trm:.e! ~
'T1liII_~ .-.nt..... ~ ~780.CO -1ha"~1Mn.
R~"'I'''''.d_Lns:
III ~...._.dbd. SItljec::l) lIle ~ <<h Mcopallan TaranlD Regian _ ~n Aulftarily
r I'eq\ftd. !hE
(1) au!llartly be gr'lIIlt8d lD 1It.l'l1il.-t.1fteGisling ~egreet1\lolGt~ lheMaUapalll:an
~_. md a.n. CataIII, 1ne 0Ulgaing OWIW aad ___ atttle pn:lperty at 37 SID,., OrM, CIty
of Natln Yert. ill mant ~ dncIbed IMrwin. suIl;ect lD lbe pun:tIu.trs a:IUftlIn\:r 1M
obIigldans under 1Ile c:unwnt -c::ra.dIment ~1Il1t and entIIring irm a _ _.......c:t.ment
~
CZ) IUIhady be ~ 1D eraririD an eIlCnl8Chment agl'Hmentwllh ~ Gld ScnIrJtba JKqu...
Ute ~ of ltle pl'Ol*tY at 'Sf SlDrw cnv., cay of NartI'I YCIIt, l\v 1Ile prerMa dl.....L.d
her1IIiI. -.c CII'\ 1M -- otSniarlmnl and CDIlIIans.. tile GillIn; enc:raac:Ilrnen agrHment;
and
(3) lIle .......""" WI. MIln.,....&.., 0tIIcids be adharizBd lIIld clIn!cled lD .. the ,... "I adIan lD gIIM
effKtu.r.tD.
CoundI Referwnc:.m~
~1 CaundI, lly1tle~ ale.- No. 1Q alRepxtNo. 11 of'Tbe MInIIgement CammlllH
CII'\ M.y 20. 1982. euIhartzBd an 'ncro-:I1mtnt ~ wiIh a.n. CalaIIL ~... at ltle PfOI*lY ..
'Sf Stmw Drive, far ltla ~ alltle Merro-......ed land at 1I1e ,... aI 37 SlInr Drive.1egdy described _
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8602
-2-
Pc Gf BIoc:Ic A. JIlIn M2I8 wtIlc:b ia 11M 111.. "NanIl HuIIIDw P81(. 'n--.s ~ all _ 01
~.....lo.~ :z:z:z.aa..... ~ (2..00 ~ tIIO ....Miiuv III iagraaalI..oi.....i.~ paaI. ,...
... 8ad c:r-. .. tIncL 11Ie ~._4 _ ill fDr . IMIl 111 .. (5) ,... ....A1ft_~""
""1. 11112111l1.ping" 31. 1917. _. __....... af-.ao l*-=s..... ~
,..., 111---..
eenwn.na 2fttfJf!Ir'" . .. -..dfar' - --,
lM ~ a.- e.Ic4 ad"'-d ... Me __ .mng tw IlI'Ol*lY It ~ SIDrW Dr*"- wiItIlhe
c:amcMIIan Gf1be 1IW II f' I OIl o-.o.r 2D, 1_ 1Ild.... ... ~ -*i -=ae tIla
..... .......,..A,.. .........m-IL n.,... t'YI~ ...Jutllfllld s-e.~ S c;._.L.ooit
c... T....... om.la. I t' 1111.' 1 "lQ"__a...4I1C11 ~ ............nicft
11M .. _ fDmI md _ _lie -....g 4I~~4 ..~ -"'It. In tbIII mpd. tile -
__._... c:araia tile.... .___""'md.... - __IIeClliltlllg __....indudIng UIe
8rIftal .... feellld ~ 01_ ~-_~, _ flI S35G.OO __ "1-. - L' _.maltier
..-...-.. .---. UIe~ u..-.a.ne c--....~. .dll......... _ af$1oa.ao
__.~..... ....atSSUIG fOr ___ 8ad,...,. aftlle ~ __-=:ImW1t .-menta an
eL lbe~wiII""be, _ ~,far"calCof,~....1Ile_-ur'hmltllt.
Conc:lu!!ieftr.
In my opnan. !be ___ c.rms _ fIIr IIld ,~.w:lh. SIIljC 1D lhe ... purdl8ur ~ Uti
~_.....1tIe c:unWlftlllC:l'08d1nwltaar-I_4. and...nna inID lIII__~ ~
wiIb lie new _.J..-f -.s on 1IIe..... -.nsllld c:ondIIallL
Summarv CMft:
'T1lis nIOllrt eontarms witft In. faR
Caqlama Pwrsann. and
Cauncil ADarwMf ~r PI8n :A) AdrrlInislnItII Pc&cills (NIA'
~ CommiItIM~
Priolllv 11) Metro 0tIIcia1 PIIIn (NIAl
Cont8et Nmntt :mil TeIeohane Numb<<:
Mr. Tony PlIIIglIa (392-8155)
MlMger ofPraparty s.m:.s
~e-{. ~
Cammisaio... of eorpor.m and Human ~_UI'QIS
~
~
B603 EXECUTJVECOMMITTEE#11196, DECEMBER 13,1996
1m- c..-. 37 S- DB-. "!ST~l!!III1%&. 416-231-9'T5G
Octabe: 7. 1.996 h:a4~. O~ '7.1996.
~~1..101Jar of Parks, Bam Can ltr Courier
.I.~ti.OIJ: lIr .G1-= Baa:11.1:em. 1Ilm1d.a1j,1:y of lIe1:OpoUtlm 1'orauto
lIe1::r:o Bal1.
55 .10= Str_t, 15th noor,
'!OX'l:IIlto, Oa.tar1o
H5V 3CS
Dear !!r. Bamil tcm:
Re: CEL~ !~ OF ;7 5ERER !!. ~ AtmAY. ~ .:JACOlmS AND
~Jh ""-"..rl ll.__" "_P N;j; . l..n.2J;~ RO. c:84"33155 .
PRO~ nLX lfO. 2062_06.S'l'O
Pa:samlt to clause 15(1.) (a) ~ the abc:rge B9r ant, I ell ac1v1s:1nq
:raa that I bage so1.d :rrr prop~ 8abject to ~ tr.msfer of the
EDc:roac::ballmt AqreGMU11: to the parc:haaers. 1: accardance w:1.1:h 'the
p~a:1.cms of 1:he ~t. I fox:mal.ly rec;u.at the CCD.SelJ:1: of the
IIet:apolUan CcrporaUOIJ 1:0 the ttaDsfar of .,. :1nte:'a8t:s to the
~:
A12day aDd Sama:~ .:Jac:qaes,
6 GreeIIbrook Dr.,
'rOr'CllJ'to, OAtar:1.o.
I!6KZJ9
(416-651-1132)
I wauld ap;lrl!ld.ata you: ass:1.staDca :1n br1nc;r1D.g Illy raqaest forwa::d
1:c the appropriate CCIIIIIl:i. t'tee, w!U.ch I 1mder.-taDd ia meeting arOUlld
Oc:1:aber lS , 1996, for ~ revi._ CId n"-"-dat101J 1:0 1!e1::'0
Ccnmd.l.
W11:h respect 1:c the E::u::roac:hment Agr--.m.t, ~e purdlasers w1.1.1 tte
applying for a tranafer of :l:tarest aZJ4 ~ 1IIId.ertabm to ezac:ute
a Dew aqreul8lJt nth the !!etropc1.1t:an Corporat101J to ba registered
011 title.
Plea.. ~irm 1:ba rece..1.p1: of 1:hi.8 lettar ad. please ca.lJ. IDe if 7QU
!laTe any quest:1.cm.s or ;: 'l.s or :Aqaj.re addS. ticma.l. 1n:taxmatiOlJ..
8izu:erely,
~t
DUDe Calo'tti
cc: Ul,j,SOIJ P'aw1_
~y 51 5-1 ,tha .:Jacque.
"
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8604
: .kII1Jq IDIl S II,. Jcqaes
.
I
0c:mbI:-" ~
u.-; '1 Rtydf~Ttmam'
)laD HaIl !
- 55 J'aIm.~
1Sda Saar. !
~ 0mIi!c
1lCSV30S!
....-...... CBe:m. ;r_~
, .
I
DcsrW:.~~ ' .... .........
~ 1'~1!!Ii~'iTrmI r,.....,... n~~ 'Nmm T~
,
I
We -= ~.. : ' f1fl1ba Uaawt pA._l". ~. -" ~ 'tIaRa pcmimz. c4_
.5 . a:rt ;. GWaedlly!.&=:a ..l1bstMllm _..... &Jiaao lD ea==ac!r.1D
~~DiIizze c:a:m.. . . .c. ;..
I
I
WlMIfsI:L 11) hIMt _ %igtl:zs =do O~"'l;P' SIlt aatiD. IM.::.- , ./"f'rr ~ .
'!PO fl ..A 1D Us m4~lIm:Wc:zm c:aaac:il ~ al1la ~~fl We
1IIII:!aQb 1D ===- 3:Zd.~ em 1idI: C GI: ap=z.e _ -"TJ' t:. .._..1
~smii1ar ar= lIlCZU:m~a lire aae=W~-d=~ ~..~
DiIme Cc:klai mctMc:m. Wo=!dy=z pleac~ DodtMs. Cetaui m4
oar:xlw:s widi & c:opy of:u C 'J -"5 ~ . , ''''U'1IIidl =spa:tm ocr
WClaI::St as sooG. a =-,. PI" . r .,.~ .... .....:..,. is &aiIahIe.
:- . . ; I.
,
l'!euc ~ 1ZI ~Y"Il!=w: my ~~ ~ 1II:i:s l-.r fit ~r.-.i.- ar ar:r
~,,~ I d.PW ,.~tba.! ., ........~-...
I
Yoms1rW:i. : /,?r' - . .
" . ;i;>
,l~ .
, .,
V: \
~ \"\\\-.
-- . . . - .. -.--.
B6D5 EXECUTIVE COMMIn:EE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
RES. #8179/96 - REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENT TO FLOOD
AND SALE OF AUTHORITY OWNED LAND
North of Finch Avenue, East of Oufferin Street, City of North York
Westside Cemeteries Limited, CFN #28284. The Authority is in receipt
of a request from Westside Cemeteries Limited to release an easement
to flood a portion of the cemetery-owned property and to sell a small
fragment of land for parking purposes, located north of Finch Avenue,
east of Oufferin Street, City of North York, Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Michael Oi Biase
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from Westside Cemeteries
Limited to release an easement to flood a portion of the cemetery-owned property and to
sell a small fragment of land for parking purposes, located north of Finch Avenue, east of
Dufferin Street, City of North York, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to complete this transaction with Westside Cemeteries Limited, in this
instance;
THAT the Authority release the easement to flood over a parcel of land owned by Westside
Cemeteries Limited consisting of 0.33 acres of land, being part of Lot 22, Concession 2
West of Yonge Street. and designated as Part 2 on Plan 64R-5861. in the City of North
York, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
THAT a parcel of Authority-owned land consisting of 0.14 acres. more or less. of land.
being part of Lot 22. Concession 2, West of Y onge Street. in the City of North York,
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, be sold to Westside Cemeteries Limited;
THAT the Authority request the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources to complete
the subject transaction on the following terms and conditions:
(a) The consideration for the transaction is as follows;
(I) The purchase price is to be $33.000.00;
(in Westside Cemeteries Limited will donate $42.000.00 for purchase of other
Greenspace lands;
continued...
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13,1996 8606
(iii) Westside Cemeteries Limited will pay $20.000 for planting and landscaping to
provide screening for the proposed new structure on the cemetery property;
(iv) Westside Cemeteries Limited will pay an additional $50.000 for planting on
Authority lands west of the cemetery;
(v) Westside Cemeteries Limited will release the Authority from the requirement
to provide for removal of excess fill from burials in the cemetery as set out in
an Agreement dated December 12. 1966;
(vi) Westside Cemeteries Limited is responsible for payment of all survey. legal.
appraisal and other costs associated with completion of this transaction.
(b) The Purchaser acknowledges and will undertake on closing that the
Transfer/Deed for the Property to be sold by the Authority containing 0.14
acres. more or less. shall contain a restrictive covenant that will prohibit the
use of the Property for any purpose or use other than for roadway and
parking purposes;
(c) The document relating to the release of flooding rights is to contain a clause stating
that any buildings constructed on Part 2 on Plan 64R-5861 will be no higher than
31.5 feet and a chimney no higher than 38.5 feet from finished grade;
(d) The Purchaser is to construct. in accordance with the Authority's standards. a
six foot black vinyl chain link fence along the new property boundary at the
purchaser's expense;
(e) A full archaeological review is to be carried out to the satisfaction of the Authority's
archaeological staff; to verify that the site has no archaeological significance and
that no mitigation measures are required;
(f) Completion of this sale will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may
be required to sever the lands from remaining Authority holdings. as well as
other development related approvals that may be required to be obtained.
such as re-zoning. Official Plan Amendment. approval of the Cemeteries
Branch of the Provincial Government. etc.. all of which are to be obtained at
the expense of Westside Cemeteries Limited. and all of which applications are
subject to Authority approval.
(g) The transaction is to be completed at the earliest possible date with payment
in full to the Authority in cash on closing;
(h) Any additional conditions as deemed appropriate by the Authority solicitor;
THAT the sale and release of the easement to flow be subject to approval of the Minister of
Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21 (2) of the Conservation Authorities Act.
R.S.O. 1990. Chapter C.27. as amended;
continued.. .
B607 EXECUTIVE COMM~E #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The subject lands were expropriated from Westminister Memorial Park Cemetery Limited, a
predecessor in title to Westside Cemeteries Limited, on December 23, 1966, under the
Finch Dam and Reservoir Project. In 1977 the Authority reconveyed four parcels of land to
the cemetery but retained an easement to flood the parcels.
The Authority was required under the original transaction, in accordance with the provisions
of an Agreement dated December 12, 1966, to provide a location on the lands acquired by
the Authority for the deposit of surplus fill generated from burials in the cemetery. There is
no longer a suitable location on these lands for deposit of this surplus fill. To continue to
fulfil this obligation the Authority must remove the fill from the cemetery property at an
estimated cost of approximately $4,000 per year. Based on the number of unoccupied
graves in the cemetery, this obligation will continue for in excess of 75 years.
Westside Cemeteries Limited has also agreed to allow public access through a portion of
the cemetery property during cemetery hours.
The transaction will be subject to Westside Cemeteries Limited obtaining at their expense
any zoning or official plan amendments required for the Cemetery's use of the property.
The transaction will also be subject to Westside Cemeteries Limited satisfying all the
Authority's technical requirements and obtaining a permit under Ontario Regulation 158.
A plan illustrating this location is attached.
FINANCIAL
It is proposed that the funding obtained from the release of this easement and sale be
utilized for the purchase of other high priority Flood Plain, Valley, Lake Ontario Shoreline and
Greenspace properties under the Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1996 -
2000.
Report prepared by:
Michael Fenning, ext. 223
For information contact:
Don Prince, ext. 221
Brian Denney, ext. 242
Mike Fenning, ext. 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13,1996 8608
- ----:..- ./
~--.
..
.I'
-
B6D9 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
!
;
1 i i i . -i
t.
: . : f I I ~ I
. J j I ! I
ID~~illa
u
.. !
.
"
, ..
~
~ ..
,
.
~
- .. . .
-
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8610
RES. #8180/96 - THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO VALLEY
AND SHORELINE REGENERATION PROJECT, 1992-1996
Springbank Avenue Erosion Control Project
GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
Lake Ontario Waterfront, Scarborough Sector, Violet Robinson and
Rafael Nebres Properties
CFN #28158 and #27034. Purchase of a property municipally known as
39 Springbank Avenue and update on the status of the purchase of 41
Spring bank Avenue, located on the Scarborough Bluffs, east of
Birchmount Road, in the City of Scarborough.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the following properties be purchased:
(a) 0.377 acres, more or less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land, improved
with a bungalow and detached garage, be purchased from Violet Robinson, said land
being Part of Lot 42, Plan 975, and Part of Lot 30, Concession A, City of
Scarborough, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, fronting on the south side of
Springbank Avenue, east of Birchmount Road:
THAT the purchase price be $167,500.00 plus demolition costs together with
payment of vendor's reasonable costs:
(b) 0.433 acres, more or le88, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land, improved with a
bungalow and detached garage, be purchased from Rafael Nebres, said land being Part of Lot
42, Plan 975, Part of Lot 30, Concession A and Part of Block A, Plan 1246, City of
Scarborough, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, and further described as Parts 1, 2 and 3,
Reference Plan 64R-10534, fronting on the south side of Springbank Avenue, east of
Birchmount Road;
THAT the purcha88 price be $90,000.00, providing there is no substantial change in the
property, plus demolition costs together with payment of vendor's reasonable legal costs in
connection with the completion of this purchase;
THAT on closing Rafael Nebres and the Mortgagee release and indemnify The Province of
Ontario, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, The City of Scarborough and the Authority,
from all actions and claims of every nature, in a form satisfactory to the Authority'llolicitor.
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the lands required free from encumbrance,
subject to existing service easements:
B611 EXECUTIVE COMMITT,EE#11196. DECEMBER 13,1996
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transactions
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
AMENDMENT
RES. #8181/96
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lorna Bissell
THAT the above noted properties be purchased from land sale revenue.
THE AMENDMENT WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A98/91, Authority Meeting #3/91, May 3, 1991, and Resolution #A 131/95,
Authority Meeting #4195, May 26, 1995, approving the Projects.
At Meeting #6/96, July 26, 1996, the Authority, under Resolution #A 132/96 adopted the
following:
THA T the Authority endorse the continuation of the Springbank A venue slope
stabilization and erosion control project, City of Scarborough, under the "Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project 1992-1996"
subject to reaching a suitable agreement with the owners, and in accordance with
the following management strategy:
1) design and construction of a slope buttress at the toe of slope, the
installation of a free draining rubble and granular blanket, and the
installation of dewatering wells in the vicinity of 39 and 41 Springbank
A venue
2) . the acquisition of 39 and 41 Springbank A venue
THA T staff be directed to proceed to implement the management strategy at a total
estimated cost of 1500,000;
THA T in light of the unsafe site conditions, staff be directed to advise the City of
Scarborough and the owner that the terms of the permit issued by the Authority
cannot be fulfilled and that the site should be secured;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8612
THA T staff be directed to negotiate the acquisition of 39 and 41 Springbank A venue,
this being the only alternative erosion control option to address the hazard;
THA T staff be directed to pursue funding opportunities with the City of Scarborough;
AND FURTHER THAT the owners of 39 and 41 Springbank Avenue and Metropolitan
Toronto be so advised.
39 Sorinobank Avenue
An agreement to purchase 39 Spring bank Avenue on satisfactory terms has been negotiated
with the owner Violet Robinson. Miss Robinson purchased the property in 1960 and in
1982 Miss Robinson conveyed the rear portion of the property to the Authority to allow for
the construction of shoreline protection works.
The purchase price is in line with the appraised value for the property.
41 Spring bank Avenue
In consideration of the potential purchase of 41 Springbank Avenue, the Executive
Committee at meeting #7/96 held on August 16, 1996, under Resolution #B99/96, adopted
the following Motion To Refer:
M THA T this item be referred back to staff for a further report;
AND FURTHER THA T staff investigate the planning, legal and management
implications related to the potential purchase by the Authority of properties located
at 39 and 41 Springbank A venue. M
Authority staff met with officials from the City of Scarborough who have advised they are
not prepared to recommended to Council that the City participate in the acquisition of 41
Springbank. The City has also taken the following action:
- the building permit for moving the house and associated works has be revoked;
- ensured the site is more secure (additional fencing etc.);
- ordered the power and other services turned off and disconnected;
- put up additional signage.
The Authority's solicitors have reviewed the files and it is their opinion that Mr. Nebres
could not make a successful claim against the Authority and the Authority should not be
responsible for any losses suffered by Nebres as a result of the purchase. In addition, at the
time the Springbank Avenue erosion control project was initiated, an Erosion Control
Agreement was registered on title in 1981 providing indemnification of the Authority.
After protracted negotiations, Mr. Nebres' is now generally agreeable to all the Authority's
terms. Also, staff have had discussions with the mortgagee and the mortgagee has agreed
to consent to the transaction and provide a full release on closing.
B613 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
The purchase price is in line with the appraised value for the property in its current state.
Detailed appraisal information is at hand and will be available for presentation at the
meeting, in private session, if required.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project
The Authority has adopted "The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline
Regeneration Project 1992 - 1996" (Project>. The context of this Project was taken from
two larger Authority initiatives, The Erosion and Sediment Control Program and Shoreline
Management Program which are components of the Authority's 1980 Watershed Plan.
Within this Project, Authority staff identify and prioritize candidate sites requiring remedial
erosion control works. The goal of the Authority through this Project is to:
uminimize the hazards to life and property that result from erosion of river banks,
valley walls and shorelines, and to protect and enhance the natural attributes of the
valley and lakefront settings"
within The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
To achieve its goal, the Authority has defined the following objectives:
1. To implement a program of erosion control works on a priority basis to
protect public and private lands where public safety and property are
endangered by erosion.
2. To implement a program of erosion control works on public and private lands
to protect the natural valleys and shoreline features and associated aquatic
and terrestrial habitats adversely affected by the erosion.
3. To design remedial works, on a design block basis, as part of an ecosystem
approach for the entire watercourse or shoreline which will; limit erosion,
enable public access adjacent to the water's edge wherever feasible, be
conducive to maintenance, and enhance aquatic and terrestrial resources.
4. To acquire those properties where the erosion hazard is severe and where the
cost of remedial works is excessive in comparison to the value of the
property.
5. To secure title on the lands where erosion control measures are to be
constructed and where the lands are valuable additions to the greenspace
systems.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8614
6. To protect and enhance the natural valley and shoreline features and
associated terrestrial and aquatic habitats.
Generally, the Authority's approach is to carry out erosion control works along the
Scarborough Bluffs sector of the Lake Ontario Shoreline by providing for protection at the
bottom of the bluffs and allowing the over steepened bluff face to recede and self stabilize.
This approach has long been recognized as the most practical and cost effective solution for
providing erosion control protection in this area. However, it also recognizes that in certain
cases, houses may become endangered as the over steepened slope recedes back to its long
term stable slope and that acquisition of certain properties may have to be considered.
The shoreline management work was carried out at the Spring bank sector of the
Scarborough Bluffs in the early 1980's. The design approach taken along Springbank
Avenue is typical of the Authority's approach for addressing the erosion along the entire
Scarborough Bluffs. Typically, we protect the toe of the bluffs from the wave action of
Lake Ontario through the construction of various revetments or beaches, while allowing the
over steepened bluff face to self stabilize or flatten. Invariably this approach results in
useable table land (often rear yards) and occasionally structures being lost as the crest
recedes.
The original project never identified the properties that may be at risk along this reach,
however, a study co'nducted by Terraprobe Geotechnical Engineers in 1989 identified four
homes that could potentially be at risk including 39 and 41 Springbank. No. 7 was acquired
by the Authority in 1995, and 27 Springbank is not in immediate hazard. In addition, top
dumping of free draining rubble material was carried out between 1980 and 1982 at No. 7
Springbank Avenue. This work was carried out under an Authority permit, but at the cost
of the property owner.
Existing Erosion Problem
Given the proximity of house No.'s 39 and 41 Springbank Avenue to the current crest of
the slope, the houses will go over the edge of the bluff slope if it is allowed to self stabilize
and flatten. In fact, recent slope failures in the area have brought the slope crest and a
near-vertical high scarp, to the southeast corner of the basement foundation at No. 41. Any
additional ground loss will undermine the house foundation and risk collapse of the dwelling
down the 55 metre high bluff. The accelerated rate of erosion experienced recently in this
section of the bluffs has placed the homes at imminent risk, and it is estimated that the
receding crest will abut the foundation of No. 39 within the next 2 to 4 years.
Because of the magnitude of the actively eroding gully and the proximity of the crest to No.
41, we are also concerned for the safety of workers who might attempt to relocate the
dwelling per the Permit issued by the Authority under Ontario Regulation 158, (Res.
#153/95) approved on October 13, 1995. Due to unforeseen delays by the owner, the
house moving and proposed shoring system were not undertaken last year. Since then,
portions of the rear deck have fallen over the bluff and the sun room is overhanging and
could collapse at any time. The recent slope failures have brought the near-vertical high
scarp to the house basement, and there is now a significant risk of additional crest loss and
damage to the existing house and danger to any workers and equipment near the slope
crest. It is now apparent that without extensive slope stabilization work, there is not an
B615 EXECUTIVE COMM~EE#11196, DECEMBER 13,1996
adequate safe building site within the lot that would provide for the long term safety of the
structure and its occupants, therefore it is the opinion of staff that it is no longer possible to
fulfill the terms of the Permit issued by the Authority.
Having completed two comprehensive geotechnical investigations and analyses for
Springbank Avenue, the recommended management strategy as approved by the Members
of the Authority at meeting #6/96 that meets the goals and objectives of the Project is to
acquire properties 39 and 41 Springbank Avenue, and to undertake engineering works to
partially stabilize the slope to minimize the future risk to municipal services. These works
would entail top dumping of free draining materials to control the rate of internal erosion
presently occurring on the bluff face. The estimated cost for this work is $200,000. This
strategy is supported by the fact that natural hazards such as bluff erosion are unforeseen
or unpredictable. Also public amenities, e.g. the road and associated servicing, will
eventually be affected. In this case, Springbank Avenue could eventually be affected.
There is an urgency to resolve this matter as the house at 41 Spring bank Avenue is vacant
and acts of trespass and vandalism have occurred. It is essential that the house be secured
immediately and removed as soon as possible. In addition, even though the bluff toe has
been fenced and signed, there is still a risk to the public from falling debris.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The subject lands will be turned over to the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto under our
management agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be through land sales revenues. Erosion Control work will
be funded through the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline
Regeneration Project.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, Extension 223
Ron Dewell, Extension 245
Nick Saccone, Extension 301
For information contact:
Don Prince, Extension 221
Brian Denney, Extension 242
Mike Fenning, Extension 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8616
L6 '-- -
.J> .
.16 Z . 1M."
- l~. Z
-
.
, AVE.
J'
LAKE ONTARIO ..
,
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
.
AUTHORITY LAND :.If.....,.'^'''>v~~
:~:, ,,~.:t..~:~,,~
......_~~
B617 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
!
j. .'
J : I . . t i
: . i I II :q
~ J! I II
ID~mm~
...
~
"
..
.>
I
~
_. - _.
...
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8618
RES. #8182/96 - SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY-OWNED LANDS
East side of Islington Avenue, South of Rutherford Road, City of
Vaughan. Regional Municipality of York
1. Sale to Islington Woods Development Ltd. ( Formerly known as
Blackplate Investments Inc.)
2. Sale to St. Francis Society of Ontario, (Formerly Father Claudio
Moser, In Trust) Franciscan Brothers, CFN #27612C
Status report on progress with the completion of land sales in the
vicinity of Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan,
Regional Municipality of York.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Lorna Bissell
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report dated December 3,
1996, relating to the status of processing the sale of surplus Authority-owned tablelands,
situate on the east side of Islington Avenue, south of Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan,
The Regional Municipality of York, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT a status report regarding the progress relating to this location be
brought forward to the Members at the earliest possible date. .............. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #6\96, held on July 26, 1996, under Resolution #A 133\96, Members
of the Authority approved the sale of the subject lands. Due to the complexities regarding
issues relating to this location, staff have reported regularly to the Members of the Authority
concerning this transaction with the most recent report being provided to the Members
during November.
ANALYSIS
Since the November staff report, processing of the transactions has continued. A brief
summary of the two transactions and the current status is as follows:
Executive Summary of Transactions
1. Islington Woods Developments Ltd. (Formerly Blackplate Investments Inc.)
Area to be purchased : 10.271 acres
. an additional 0.793 acres will be conveyed to the purchaser or the City of Vaughan
to facilitate an access road being constructed by the purchaser, from Islington
Avenue between th~ lands being sold to St. Francis Society of Ontario
Purchase price: $1,848,780.00
B619 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
Conditions and approvals:
(a) On November 7, 1996, the purchaser's condition relating to the due diligence
review, was waived. Accordingly, upon the Authority obtaining the approval of the
Minister of Natural Resources, the initial $135,000. deposit will become non-
refundable. Authority staff, in the negotiations relating to the waiving of the due
diligence condition, agreed that the deposits due under paragraphs 1. (b) and (c) of
the Agreement of Purchase and Sale, be postponed until the severance, that is
required under the Agreement, the Official Plan Amendment and approval of The
Minister of Natural Resources to the sale, have been obtained in final form.
Paragraphs 1 (b) and 1 (c) read as follows:
1. (b) PURCHASER covenants and agrees to pay by certified cheque to the
Vendor a further deposit of 2.5% of the Purchase Price thirty days after
acceptance herein to be held by it pending completion or other termination of
this Agreement and to the credited on account of the Purchase Price on
completion; and
(c) PURCHASER agrees to pay the sum of $100,000.00 by certified
cheque(s) to the vendor semi-annually (to commence six months after the
acceptance herein and thereafter until closing, and an additional $100,000.00
on the second anniversary of acceptance, all as further deposit(s) to be held
by it pending completion or other termination of this Agreement and to be
credited on account of the Purchase Price on completion. The deposits paid
by the Purchaser pursuant to 1 (b) and (c) shall be returned to the Purchaser if
this Agreement is terminated for any reason other than a default by the
Purchaser.
(b) The appropriate approval authorities are in the process of dealing with the following
approvals:
(i) Land Severance - the severance approved by the Committee of Adjustment
for the City of Vaughan on October 24, 1996, has been appealed by the
following parties:
(a) Friends of, Boyd Park
(b) Vaughan wood Ratepayers Assoc.
(c) Islington Woods Developments Ltd.
(ii) Official Plan Amendment - The decision of Council of the City of Vaughan to
refuse the request for an official plan amendment to facilitate the proposed
residential use, requested by the proponent has been appealed to The Ontario
Municipal Board by Islington Woods Developments Ltd. The study relating to
appropriate land uses at this location requested by Council, at its meeting of
October 28, 1996 and which was to have been prepared by November 28,
1996, is now to be submitted on March 3, 1997, in accordance with the
Council direction at a meeting held on December 2, 1996.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8620
(c) Approval of the Minister of Natural Resources - The legal survey of property was
registered on October 29, 1996, and the submission was forwarded to the Ministry
of Natural Resources October 30, 1996.
(d) Terms of Agreement - The Agreement as originally prepared, provided for an
extended period of closing which would provide for sufficient time for the official
plan amendment, rezoning and draft plan approval to be dealt with through the
Ontario Municipal Board process. The proponent has now appealed the various
decisions and is in the process of attempting to arrange for a consolidation of all
outstanding issues at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, anticipated to be held
during the second half of 1997.
Archaeological : The archaeological investigation is currently being carried out at the cost
of the purchaser and is now in the final stages of completion.
The proponent at the time the offer was made had anticipated a long process to obtain
required approvals and had provided appropriate time in the Agreement of Purchase and
Sale to accommodate Ontario Municipal Board hearings.
2. St. Francis Society of Ontario (Formerly Father Claudia Moser, In Trust)
Area to be purchased: 10.846 acres
Purchase price: $1,518,440.00
Initial deposit credited to the Authority - $75,000.00
Conditions and approvals:
(a) An extension to December 6, 1996, has been granted to allow the purchaser to
complete his due diligence review. In view of the requirement of the purchaser to
obtain a re-zoning of a small parcel, in the southern portion of the property to
facilitate the proposed use, the closing may need to be subject to the re-zoning being
obtained.
(b) The appropriate approval authorities are in the process of dealing with the following
approvals:
(i) Land Severance - The approval of the severances by the Committee of
Adjustment for the City of Vaughan, at a meeting held on October 24, 1996,
has now been appealed by the following parties:
(a) Friends of Boyd Park
(b) Vaughanwood Ratepayers Assoc.
(c) Islington Woods Developments Ltd.
B621 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #111'96, DECEMBER 13, 1996
(ii) Re-zoning - While the report adopted by the Council of The City of Vaughan
at meetings held on October 21 and October 28, 1996, appeared to support
the required rezoning, to facilitate the institutional uses at this location, it was
subject to an additional report being brought back to Council concerning this
matter.
This additional report was to have been brought before Council by no later
than November 28, 1996. At the Council meeting held on December 2,
1996, Council extended the date for submission of this report to March 3,
1997.
The Authority solicitor, in a letter dated December 2, 1996, a copy of which
is appended, advised the City that this matter was to be dealt with within 90
days of the filing of the application Le. December 17, 1996, or it was in order
for the Authority to appeal, in order to consolidate this matter with the other
related appeals and referrals already appealed and referred to the Ontario
Municipal Board.
(c) Approval of the Minister of Natural Resources - The legal survey was completed on
October 29, 1996, and the submission was forwarded to the Ministry of Natural
Resources on October 30, 1996.
(d) Terms of Agreement - The Agreement of Purchase and Sale provided for a closing
date of November 29, 1996, with provision for an extension of up until December
31, 1996, which extension has been granted.
Archaeological : The Archaeological investigation has been completed at the cost of the
purchaser and staff advise that there are no archaeological concerns
involved with respect to use of the property for institutional purposes.
It should be noted that the proposed purchase of the subject lands by the St. Francis
Society of Ontario, (formerly Father Moser, In Trust) was on the premise, that a school and
retreat centre was to be built at an early date and open for use by September 1998. The
representatives of the purchaser are extremely distressed by the various appeals and are
now in the process of reviewing their options with respect to this site. A meeting of the
Franciscan Fathers and their advisors is being held on December 5, 1996, to review their
plans and options concerning this site and any further information resulting from this
meeting, will be made available to the Members as soon as details are available.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8622
It should be noted that the two transactions contained in this report, came in as a joint
proposal and the Agreement of Purchase and Sale between Islington Woods Developments
Ltd. and the Authority, has provision for it to acquire the lands originally to be sold to the
Franciscan Fathers, in the event they decline to proceed with the completion of this
transaction.
A plan illustrating the parcels being sold and the general area is appended for the
information of the Members.
Report prepared by:
Don J. Prince, extension 221
The following report updated the status of this item, following the
report adopted under Res. #8182/96.
RES. #8183/96 - SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY-OWNED LANDS
East side of Islington Avenue, South of Rutherford Road, City of
Vaughan
Regional Municipality of York
1. Sale to Islington Woods Development Ltd. (Formerly known as
Blackplate Investments Inc.)
2. Sale to St. Francis Society of Ontario, (Formerly Father Claudio
Moser, In Trust) Franciscan Brothers, CFN #27612C
Additional information resulting from meeting held on December 9,
1996.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Lorna Bissell
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report dated December 12,
1996, relating to the status of processing the sale of surplus Authority-owned tablelands,
situate on the east side of Islington Avenue, south of Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan,
The Regional Municipality of York, be received. ........................ CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This report is in addition to the item included with the December 13, 1996, Executive
Committee Agenda.
ANALYSIS
Authority staff and our solicitor met with representatives of Father Claudio Moser, In Trust,
on Monday, December 9, at which time we discussed a number of issues. The following
matters are still outstanding and we have not reached agreement on them:
. The Purchaser will not agree that its deposit will be non-refundable;
8623 EXECUTIVE COMMIn:eE.11196, DECEMBER 13,1996
. The Purchaser will not assume carriage and costs for the re-zoning unless it
determines at some unspecified time in the next few months that a site specific
zoning would be required for its development; and
. The Purchaser will not assume any responsibility for park levies.
In addition, the Purchaser will require that the closing date, now set for December 31,
1996, be extended to the date the re-zoning and severances are final and acceptable to
them, or August 31, 1997, whichever first comes.
CONCLUSION
It is proposed that following discussion with the Executive Committee on December 13, a
report recommending action to be taken in these matters will be presented to the Members
of the Authority at the meeting scheduled for December 20, 1996.
Report prepared by: Don J. Prince, extension 221
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8624
- - -Q
,
.
.~ - -
;\~. ."2,
\':~~:i
::~-""".' :
,'., -...-)..
- ~~..;-~~.
..
I ."
,
- -
. -
..~-:-::-: ---..
,,#4 .... _
~.. --
..... -,
P3rcel 'C' proposed to be conveyed to (slington Woods Developments Ltc.
(Formerly Blackolate Investments Inc.l
8625 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
GAJUJ~R,ROBERTS Scacia I'WzI. :;War 31110
~ _ SabcilOlS 4U Kiq StIa:t w.r
'IbnwoeQ. 0Naan
c-aa M.'IH m
~ (416) I65066llO
"-imi1& (416) lI&6616
~lwor 2. 1996 ~
DEI.JVgm BY FAX AND MAn
I
!
'lbc Or of Vauahan
Office of tbc CIty Clc:dc
2141 ~r ~,,~.., 0ri'VC
Vall&bm, 0Dart0
L6A IT1
Am:mioa: 101m I..e:ach. CIty Ocrt
Dear Sir.
BE: 'I1ae ~1Itaa TGI'lIIdD......... r-I..... AIdbIadty
... SUI or SarpJas LaDdI- r_""9on Anaaa. SaaIb oI'btbG'fonlltaad
no.. PIle Nft Ii1 ~
We ac:z: Cor The MmopoI1w1 TOnmID IZId Rqion CouscmdoD AudlDrtty (Ibe "MTRCA") in this
1IIlIUI:r.
MTRCA re=ivcd the conscm of the Co.~ of AcUusuncnt lD IeW!r the subject lands iDtD three
scpmrc lou. The kx creasa1 far tbc pwpcse of I rmcu was appl'OYl:d OD the: coDdil:lan cba1 tbc CDIire
lot be 2Illled "AarDJIwaI" (tbc lot is prcseudy 2DIICd panty "Aaricultu-"':U" and partly .Open Spaa:j.
The rezoning application wbidI will acbim: compllaace witb this condilion wu fUed on ScplCIlber
17, 1996 (t=miaa Ole Z.96.066). A public mccdDa on me rcmDlDa was bc1d CD Ocrobcr 21. 1996.
At the public m=iD& the o....."'~ of IIIc Wbole acidIcr IpprolCd DOt refused tbc rczcnln&
lPI'n.-.riot't InsICad. s&:Iff WIS d1n=d lD UIIllc:natc a IaDI1 use smdy 1Dc11O COIIIplcD: tbis sCDc1y wiIhin
!our weeks.
AId1cu&h die dmc Cor ccmplcticn of !be study IIu ezpircd. lbc lIWly hu IIllt been prepared. IDd it Is
IIOW proposed 1Iu: SlUdy be CDmpleled by MIlch 3, 1997, wbicb dire was armed aJ ~ 11 a
m=inI of Vaqhan md local DCi&JIbcun. No DDdcc of die mcaID& was amn to 1:'.' ....ll:IIt.
This _ craaa m undue delay Cor the MTllCA. Under s~ (11) ofliJe P1aaDiDc Al:1, III .......,~
by Bill 20, IIIIil::sI Vaupn makes a clecision within 90 days of tbe mIDI of tbc appUcalon. MTllCA
II emitIed to aDd will ba'VC to appeal ill order 10 amsolld= the mallet wid1 the otbet rela1ed appeals
UId Mfcnals abculy appea1ec11Dd Mfemd to tbc a.M.B.
~ UIIIIa ~ all""" c:.w..!lu~ JUll. DID ltwf. 7. ......... en...;". CIMlia 1AIt.u.o. TcI: (lIQ3I1IIllom:l. 'aa: tMl MQ.O'JIII
I\4antzNlAfmlale: MImpr 5mW
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B626
GARDINER. ROBERTS
2
We 1lUIId ut _ tbillem=r be pllced bc!om tbc C<-in- of die Whole It ill n...-t,er 2. 1996
IIIICIl:dIII. IIlIapect of ial 33 oa ill qaIdL
'DIIIIII: ,..
Yom lrIIIJ.
GARDINER. ROBEltI'S
J(eZ
Jobc:a I.ouow
m.-u- (~l6)'~
(T.-~
~
c:.c. DaD PriDl:c. M'IRCA ../
GlUt Uyeyama. V... PIaImlq Depara:I:IcIIl
Wayae Mc:E~. VGIIbm PIamdaa Dcpanmcat
Ambcmy Puc:al. '-aL Zeadl
Loa !'ampUL IDL CaDmucz!cn
.M)'I'OIl Pcaa1uty. Della Urbm IDe...
-- '1
B627 EXECUTIVE COMMI~EE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
RES. #8184/96 - STRATEGY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF AUTHORITY PROPERTY
ASSETS
Progress report on strategy for management of Authority property assets
through sales and leases including:
(1) status of the acquisition program
(2) clarification of the procedure for determining the suitability of
Authority lands to either be considered surplus tc Authority
needs and therefore eligible for disposal (sale/lease) or required
for the greenspace system and therefore eligible for lease only
as determined by The Strategy For Public Use of Conservation
Authority lands
(3) the utilization of the land sale revenue and other sources of
revenues for land acquisition
Moved by: Michael Oi Biase
Seconded by: lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the progress report on the strategy for
management of Authority property assets be received;
THAT staff report to the Authority at the earliest possible date on the following issues:
i. review of acquisition limits as set out in the Greenspace Protection and Acquisition
Project 1996- 2000;
ii. clarification of the relationship between the policies for declaring land surplus and
The Strategy For Public Use of Conservation Authority lands and review of the
public notification guidelines;
iii. review of the importance of large tableland blocks owned by the Authority, generally
associated with the reservoir tracts and Conservation Areas, in the context of current
and future regional open space needs and suitability for disposal in consultation with
the Regional and local municipalities;
iv. review of other sources of revenue to meet the Authority's future acquisition needs;
THAT staff continue to implement the process for declaring lands surplus, in connection
with the use of small parcels of tableland or isolated lots on the perimeters of our holdings,
encroachments and other routine public uses in accordance with approved procedures, for
sites other than those already approved for disposal;
AND FURTHER THAT staff consult with appropriate municipal officials with respect to the
land acquisition and management issues identified in this report. ............ CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8628
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #2/96 held on March 29, 1996, the following Resolution #A21 196
was approved:
THA T staff prepare a review of the Authority's overall financial situation and the role
that land deemed surplus to Greenspace requirements might play during 1996 and
future years and;
THA T the staff report to the Authority at the earliest possible date with a proposed
strategy.
To respond to the above noted Resolution it is necessary to clarify and answer a number of
questions about the Authority's acquisition program, the policies for declaring Authority
owned lands surplus and the Strategy for Public Use of Conservation Authority Lands:
. what part of the greenspace system is the Authority interested in acquiring and why?
. what are the Authority's priorities for acquisition?
. what lands are potentially surplus to the Authority needs and why?
. what are the differences between the disposal process and the Strategy for Public
Use of Conservation Authority lands?
. how do the large blocks of Authority owned tableland fit into the future regional
open space needs?
At Meeting # 9/96, the Authority adopted Resolution #A 195/96, thereby approving the
1997-1999 Business Plan and 1997 Preliminary Estimates. The Business Plan identified
fifteen business components in six general areas. "Management of Public Assets" was
recognized as one of the significant areas the Authority must address and the Authority's
land is considered to be our major asset. The business components associated with
Management of Public Assets and the land Acquisition and Disposal component identified
the need to manage our property assets on a sound resource management and fiscally
responsible basis.
The Authority has an inventory of land in excess of 32000 acres. The Authority's lands may
be considered under two categories; those required to maintain the Greenspace/Regional
Open Space System and those non greenspace lands which may be considered surplus.
lands considered as non-greenspace lands are addressed through the policies for
determining surplus lands and requests for use of Authority-owned greenspace lands are
addressed by the Strategy For Public Use of Conservation Authority lands. If after extensive
technical review and public consultation, lands are determined to be surplus then it makes
sound business sense, to either sell or lease these lands on a systematically strategic basis
to optimize revenues and the resulting revenues re-invested in the purchase of high priority
greenspace properties.
B629 EXECUTIVE COMMITT.EE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
Similarly, if a use is proposed within the Authority's greenspace lands, then the compatible
resource base use must be determined. An appropriate resource base use may then be
permitted subject to public review and a suitable lease arrangement being negotiated.
Revenues, again should be re-invested in Authority programing.
Following are the financial projections related to acquisition and disposal as identified in the
Business Plan.
land Aca. & Disposals 1997 1998 1999
Acquisition budget 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000
Projected land Sale 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250,000
Revenue Available
Other Sources: 750,000 750,000 750,000
Donations. Municipal.
Provincial. Federal
lands approved previously by the Authority as surplus or which are in the process of being
considered as surplus are found in the list below. Revenues from the sale or lease of these
properties, at such time as agreements for their purchase are received and approved, will go
to financing the acquisition budget proposed for 1997 to 1999.
. the north east corner of Jane Street and Steeles Avenue, City of Vaughan
. east side of Islington Avenue, south of Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan
. land in the vicinity of Rodd Avenue (approximately 12 lots), Town of Pickering
. a residential lot on Riverside Drive, City North York
. a residential lot at 139 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough
. a residential lot and home at 147 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough
. a 50 acre parcel north of Steeles Avenue, on the west side of the 8th Line in the
Claireville area, City of Brampton
. land presently under agreement with the Town of Caledon and the Bolton Horse
Show in the Palgrave area, Town of Caledon
. a six acre parcel on the north side of Glasgow Road, in the Bolton area, Town of
Caledon
. a residential lot on the west side of HWY #50, in the Bolton area, Town of Caledon
. a six acre parcel in the Glen Major area, Township of Uxbridge
. land on the west side of Duffin Creek, south of Bayly Street, Town of Ajax
. land at the rear of a commercial property at 99 Ortona Court, City of Vaughan
A. Acquisition History
Since its formation in 1957, the Authority has successfully used land acquisition as the
preferred method to provide relief from flood and erosion hazard; to carry out conservation
and regeneration measures; to protect environmentally significant greenspace lands; to
provide the opportunity for rehabilitation of degraded areas; and to provide opportunities for
public use and enjoyment within what the Authority has defined as the Regional Greenspace
System.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13. 1996 8630
Since its first acquisition projects the Authority has been guided by a Master Plan for
Acquisition. Two categories of land; hazard land and conservation land have been applied in
identifying where and why the Authority has a interest in acquisition. Land acquisition has
always been carried out in light of a number factors:
. its cost
. other alternatives to controlling land use
. significance of the role the acquired land will play in water management
. benefits such as regional greenspace/open space
In considering the Regional significance in respect to both water management and
assembling open space; acquisition has been generally applied to the main valleys, the
waterfront and environmentally significant lands. The consideration of acquisition costs has
also shaped the Master Plan of Acquisition. For example acquisition is not considered where
substantial portions of communities exist within the main valley corridors. While there has
been some refining of the definitions for hazard lands and conservation lands over the years
the implementation of the acquisition program has been very consistent resulting in a
significant amount of the regional greenspace system being protected through public
ownership. land ownership can include; fee simple, easements, covenants, and agreements.
Initially the Authority acquired properties devastated by Hurricane Hazel. These areas were
located randomly throughout the watershed's in the Authority's jurisdiction; lower Highland
Creek, lower Rouge, lower Etobicoke Creek, the Woodbridge Area and Raymore Drive
stand out as prime examples. The wide distribution of flood prone development pointed to
the need for an overall strategy for acquiring hazard land and this in turn led to the
development of the "Plan for Flood Control and Water Conservation", 1959. The acquisition
component of the Plan which became the Master Plan of Acquisition, called for the
acquisition of flood plain and conservation lands within the main valleys within the
Authority's jurisdiction. The Plan also called for the acquisition of several reservoir sites to
control downstream flooding. Waterfront hazard lands were added to the Master Plan for
Acquisition in the early 1970's.
An Acquisition Program was adopted as part of the 1980 Watershed Plan whose goal is as
follows:
"To acquire Hazard and Conservation land in order to protect it against unwise land
use which would affect the natural functions, and conserve significant and sensitive
land for the benefit of the Region"
Hazard lands are defined as those lands susceptible to risk from erosion and or flooding on
those lands defined by a watercourse generally draining in excess of 1300 hectares
(comparable to the main valleys identified in the Plan for Flood Control) and waterfront
lands. Conservation lands are defined as those significant valley lands generally draining in
excess of 1300 hectares and waterfront lands plus those lands that are environmentally
sensitive and abut the valley corridors, waterfront, or are part of the head.water zone. The
B631 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE *11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
Environmental Significant Study carried out in 1982 and periodically updated since that
time, established the limits of the ESA's within our Region, which were then incorporated
into the Acquisition Program. The attached Figure 1 represents the Regional Greenspace
System as currently defined and effectively establishes the acquisition limits or the Master
Plan of Acquisition.
In 1989, the Authority adopted the Greenspace Strategy for the Greater Toronto Region in
which the Authority advocated the protection of the region's entire greenlands system
including; headwaters areas, river systems (main valleys watercourses and their tributary)
and the waterfront as the principal resources necessary to ensure a healthy ecosystem and
healthy watersheds across the region. The Interim Greenspace Protection and Acquisition
Project 1993-1996 and the current Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1996-
2000 incorporated the technical criteria for the protection of the greenlands system,
outlined in the Greenspace Strategy. The Greenspace Strategy and subsequent
implementing projects have defined the overall Greenlands System as including the
following:
Greenspace System Criteria
. valley and stream corridors
. the Lake Ontario waterfront
. Environmentally significant areas
. Wetlands (Classes 1 - 7)
. kettle lakes
. ground water discharge areas
. significant woodlot/vegetation/habitat linkages
Carolinian Forest
. riparian habitat zones
. flood control and erosion project lands
. Niagara Escarpment park extensions
. links for the regional trail system
. other lands identified by the Authority in cooperation with its member municipalities
and/or the Province of Ontario as complementary to the Greenspace system
Governments at various levels have recognized the importance of protecting the greenspace
system. The Official Plans for the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the Regional
Municipalities of Durham and York and the draft Official Plan for the Regional Municipality of
Peel, have all recognized th,e important role the environment plays in the quality of life
within the Region and have all aaopted policies that identify and protect the Regional
Greenspace/Open space system and further have identified them suitable for public
acquisition and use. The regional greenspace/Open space systems the Regions have
identified are generally consistent with what the Authority has defined as suitable for
acquisition by the Authority. In addition the Regional Official Plans have recognized the
importance the tributary watercourses, ravines, and local environmental features are to the
overall health of the watersheds and have adopted policies that encourage the area
municipalities to protect these resources.
Almost all the area municipalities have adopted or are in the process of adopting Official
Plans that recognize and advocate protection of local environmental features. While public
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/96, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B632
ownership at the local municipal level is the preferred tool to protect the local features, we
also, as with the Regional Greenspace System, rely on other tools such as the Authority
Regulations and restrictive zoning to control inappropriate land use.
While the Authority continues to advocate the protection of the entire greenspace system
the Authority's Acquisition Project generally concentrates on the Regional Greenspace
System illustrated in Figure 1. Although the Acquisition Project has some flexibility built
into it, in order to help meet the requirements of our municipalities staff feel it is timely to
review the acquisition limits in light of:
. financial constraints, including carrying costs associated with taxes and maintenance
. Provincial land disposition in the region (ie:North Pickering, Cornell, MNR Maple)
As a result staff are prepared to report back to the Authority with suggestions regarding the
review of acquisition limits as set out in the Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project
1996-2000.
The property acquired by the Authority to December 31, 1995 is listed on Table 1, by
Municipality.
TABLE 1
LAND DISTRIBUTION BY MUNICIPALITY
REGIONAL lOCAL HECTARES (ACRES) TOTAL
MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPALITY
METROPOLITAN NORTH YORK 887 (2191 )
TORONTO SCARBOROUGH 1598 (3947)
ETOBICOKE 735 ( 1817) 4005 (9896)
EAST YORK 243 (601)
TORONTO 406 (1003)
YORK 136 (337)
PEEL MISSISSAUGA 75 ( 186)
CALEDON 2595 (6412)
BRAMPTON 1048 (2589) 3718 (9187)
DURHAM AJAX 541 ( 1338)
PICKERING 812 (2007)
UXBRIDGE 1214 (2999) 2567 (6344)
YORK MARKHAM 132 (326)
KING 440 (1088)
RICHMOND HILL 141 (349)
AURORA 5 (11 ) 2561 (6327)
VAUGHAN 1682 (4156)
WHITCHURCH- 161 (397)
STOUFFVILLE
B633 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE iJ11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
ADJALA- ADJALA- 139 (343) 139 (343)
TOSORONTIO TOSORONTIO
MONO MONO 36 (90) 36 (90)
TOTAL 13026 (32187)
These lands comprise valley and stream corridors, the Lake Ontario waterfront,
environmentally significant areas, provincial wetlands, kettle lakes, ground water discharge
areas, significant woodlot/vegetation/habitat linkages, Carolinian forest, riparian habitat
zones, flood control and reservoir lands and significant properties along the Niagara
Escarpment.
The purchase of these lands has been guided by the Authority's Master Plan for Acquisition
and has been implemented through the following projects:
. the "Plan for Flood Control and Water Conservation" 1959;
. the "Interim Water and Related land Management Project";
. the Lake Ontario Waterfront Projects 1972-76, 1977-81, 1982-86, 1987-91 and
1992-94;
. the land Acquisition Projects 1982-86 and 1987-91;
. the "Hazard and Conservation land Acquisition Project within The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto" 1987-91;
. The Greenspace Strategy for the Greater Toronto Region - 1989
. the "Project for the Acquisition of land within the Niagara Escarpment Park System"
1986-96;
. "The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project"
1992-1996;
. the "Interim Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1993-1995";
. a number of site-specific projects; and
. the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program;
The Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1996 - 2000 is the current implementing
project.
B. Identification of lands Potentially Surplus to the Needs of the Authority
The Authority owns in excess of 32,000 acres. When the current Greenspace System
Criteria used to define the Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project, are applied to the
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8634
Authority holdings it is evident that not all Authority lands would meet the greenspace
criteria and therefore, potentially could be surplus to the Authority's needs. Typically the
lands not fulfilling the criteria are flat tablelands with no environmental features and are
generally associated with:
. the extensive buffer land acquired as part of the flopd control reservoir lands (ie:
Claireville, Boyd)
. Conservation Areas (ie: Rodd Avenue)
. those acquisitions where it was necessary to acquire entire holdings, including lands
beyond the basic requirements, to achieve the Authority objectives in a cost
effective and timely manner
These non-greenspace lands may be fairly large blocks, generally associated with the
reservoir lands and Conservation Areas, small parcels of tableland or isolated lots located on
the perimeter of our various holdings. This level of analysis is at a very cursory and is
essentially an initial screening tool. Ultimately levery parcel that may be considered surplus,
must be reviewed on a site specific basis in respect to detailed technical criteria (such as
buffer size, open space linkages, operating part of a conservation area, required to support
functions or activities within the greenspace system etc.) and the local community and
appropriate agencies consulted to help determine the suitability for disposal. At this cursory
level of review, the Authority is limited to describing what lands typically, may be
considered surplus and generally where they might be found.
In the case of the extensive buffer land (tablelands) acquired as part of the flood control
reservoir lands the acquisition included not only the valley and stream corridor, but also
sufficient lands to provide a buffer to these facilities and recreational opportunities and
again includes tablelands where entire holdings were purchased in specific instances to
achieve acquisition of the partial taking required.
Over time, the Authority's structural approach to dealing with flood risk changed from
upstream dams, to more site specific flood control works. The Authority also emphasizes
prevention through development control, regulations and valley land acquisition. While the
1980 Watershed Plan, identified the desirability of retaining all the lands purchased for these
large projects for future open space uses, staff feel it is timely to review whether the
extensive buffer land component is required for openspace purposes.
All parcels declared surplus have been reviewed on a site specific basis and appropriate
agencies and the associated community consulted to help determine the suitability of those
parcels for disposal. Where. disposition of reservoir tablelands has taken place, the 1980
Watershed Plan policy, has been amended on a site specific basis. While there has been
little or no opposition to the sale of small fragments or parcels of tableland there have been
concerns raised over the disposition of large blocks of lands as it relates to the current and
future regional open space needs.
The Council of the Regional Municipality of York, at its meeting on October 24, 1996,
adopted clause No.9, Report No. 10 of the Regional Planning Committee, which dealt with
B635 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
Policy/External Agency Surplus Land Disposal. Contained in the body of the Planning
Committee report was the following recommendation:
-Regional staff, staff of the MTRCA and staff of the area municipalities establish a protocol
for determining the impacts of surplus land designation-;
-Regional staff and staff of the MTRCA develop criteria to maintain and enhance public
conseNation land holdings to ensure flexibility for the future recreation and open space
needs for residents of the region-.
Staff recommend:
. that the Authority continue to implement the disposal process in connection with the
use of small parcels of tableland or isolated lots on the perimeters of our holdings,
encroachments and other routine public uses in accordance with approved
procedures, for sites other than those already approved for disposal;
and defer on any requests regarding large blocks of tableland until further study is carried
out, and further:
. that staff review the importance of large tableland blocks owned by the Authority,
generally associated with the reservoir tracts and Conservation Areas, in the context
of current and future regional open space needs and suitability for disposal in
consultation with the Regional and local municipalities.
C. Sale/Use of Authority-owned lands
From time to time, the Authority has been requested to consider the sale or lease of its
lands. To ensure an open, public and consultative process for the potential sale or lease of
Authority land, the Authority adopted;
(i) land Disposal Policy in 1990 (updated in 1995)
(ii) Strategy for Public Use of Conservation Authority lands in 1995 - this strategy was
developed in response to a growing demand for the use of Authority lands for public
and community purposes and also because of the concern by the public, regarding
the impact the proposed uses might have on the resource base
The Land Disposal Policy is used when the Authority has been asked to sell a parcel of land,
and where staff has determined that a parcel of land is not considered part of the
Greenspace System. The Strategy for Public Use of Conservation Authority Lands policy is
applied when the Authority receives a request to use/lease Authority land, that is considered
to be part of the Greenspace System.
When a request is received for the sale or lease, or when staff is proposing a sale or lease,
the parcel of land evaluated or screened on the basis of the greenspace system criteria
generally as set out in the Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project, and as found in
this report. A report is presented to the Executive recommending that either:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8636
(I) the parcel fulfils one or more of the greenspace system criteria and therefore it will
be considered for lease only and will be reviewed under the policies of the strategy
for Public Use of Conservation Lands;
- the uses considered must be compatible to the resource base and therefore will
generally be recreational in nature.
- implicit in this process is the possibility that the lands are not suitable for lease or
change in use due to the sensitive nature of the resource; or
(ij) the parcel does not fulfil any of the land acquisition criteria and could potentially be
declared surplus and will be reviewed under the policies for declaring land surplus.
This process will also determine whether the subject parcel be sale or lease, or as the
market dictates.
Because there has been some confusion about which process should be used and questions
about the public notification guidelines associated with the surplus policies, staff
recommends:
. that a report be for1fVarded to the Authority regarding the clarification of the
relationship between the policies for declaring lend surplus end The Strategy For
Public Use of Conservation Authority lends end review of the public notification
guidelines.
D. Sources of Funds/Use of Proceeds
The Authority has been successful during the past 10 years in obtaining substantial
municipal and provincial funding for special projects such as The Metropolitan Toronto
Hazard and Conservation Land Acquisition Project and The Project For The Etobicoke Motel
Strip Waterfront Park. General acquisition of Greenspace lands has relied on funding from
Authority land sales or monies raised from private and corporate donations. The breakdown
of funding from these sources for the period 1986 to 1995, inclusive, is shown on Chart 1.
CHART 1
LAND ACQUISITION FUNDING 1986 - 1995 $
~
YEAR MNR GRANT OTHER PROVo LEVY LOCAL LAND SALE DONATIONS OTHER TOTAL
FUNDING MUNIC. REVENUE
FUNDING
1986 J 2,419,880 I 71,676 1 1,558,680 I o I 703,398 I 01 o I 4,753,643 ]1
1987 J 2,147,261 I 430,983 r 5,719,632 I o I 1,080,887 I 01 15,990 I 9,394,753 II
1988 1 13,509,953 I __. _~32,425 I 3,605,406 I 213,788 I 397,464 I . ..~ I=-~Ht91~1 . J;,~8-9J~~]
1989~ 1,627,439 I 1,349,043 I 4,573,084 I o I 2,345,611 1 172,000 _Inn n1~20;r-10,068,380 II
1990 I 5,492,357 1 25,7931 10,444,~J --- O-r- 9.498,5~~L- oj 1,326 I 25,462,457 II
1991__J 308,4921 (750,0001 1 291,878 1 o I 6,338,938 1 888,8;L1,408 j .!l..879.1,;]1
1992 I - 88;:;~-L 9~~88,1441 8,311 ,~:i.4] -.. . 380,048nl 854,825-1 28,000 1 24,411 1 17.553.100 II
l~~L_L- ~~~~;;-r-~8.52' r--;-53.83sl 291.800 I 1.089.008 I 10.390 I 40.744 I 11.927.273 II
B637 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE .11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
1994 72 650 113,788 207 196 217 689 654518 17,250 187,180J 1,470,27
1995 44 072 3217 44 073 413 083 2,193387 341 000 416.631 4.175,3~
TOTAL 26,945721 20,649,590 32,909,228 1.518,404 25,878,414 1 257,240 999.809 110154,4<:
In the case of "Land Sale Revenue," the Authority has disposed of higher valued and higher
taxed tablelands and has reinvested the proceeds by purchasing core Greenspace land. Key
environmental properties are being acquired while small surplus parcels are being disposed
of on a strategic, financially sound and timely basis. Part of our success in this area is the
result of our approach to sell surplus lands over time, as the market dictates, to maximize
the return. Chart 2 illustrates the steady increase in Authority land ownership over the
years.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13,1996 8638
CHART 2
AREA OF LAND ACQUISmONS AND SALES 1985-1995 (ACRES)
LANDS ACQUIRED TOTAL TOTAL
YEAR LANDS SOLD DIFFERENCE AUTHORITY
OWNERSHIP
1986 624.849 (43.933) 580.916 29,608.466
1987 516.856 (90.347) 426.509 30,034.975
1988 114.666 (14.128) 100.538 30,135.513
1989 260.981 (97.466) 163.515 30,299.028
1990 47.946 (62.014) ( 14.068) 30,284.960
1991 1,312.764 (20.598) 1 ,292.166 31,577.126
1992 171.904 (0.974) 170.930 31,748.056
1993 180.247 (0.364) 179.883 31,927.939
1994 74.438 (2.180) 72.258 32,000.197
1995 202.838 (16.516) 186.322 32,186.519
I TOTAL 1 3,507.4891 (348.520)1 3,158.9691 32,186.5191
As noted in Charts 1 and 2, the Land Acquisition Program has relied heavily on land sales
revenues over the last 10 years. As traditional grant and levy continue to decline, it is
expected that land sales revenues in the future will continue to play an important role and
therefore, staff are recommending we continue to use land sales revenues, together with
other funding sources; such as the Charles Sauriol Environmental land Trust, private and
corporate donations and partnerships with various levels of government to implement the
Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project. However, it is recognized that the inventory
of surplus lands is finite and the Authority cannot rely on this revenue source indefinitely.
As a result staff are recommending we report to the Authority on the review of other
sources of revenue to meet the Authority's future acquisition needs.
8839 EXECUTIVE COMM'n:eE "'1196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
It should be also noted that the Authority must comply with the Provincial Revenue Sharing
Policy when disposing of land. The Provincial Revenue Sharing policy is currently being
reviewed at the Province in consultation with The Association of Conservation Authorities of
Ontario (ACAO). Information recently received from the ACAO indicate as in the past, the
Province is retaining the right to its share of revenues on/from properties or from the
disposition of Conservation Authority owned property and should the province decide to
allow a Conservation Authority to retain this revenue, the Province has the right to direct
how the revenue can be used. Indications are that the Province will let the Authorities retain
their revenues. It is felt that generally revenues derived from the use of properties may be
used at the discretion of the Authority and revenue generated through the disposition of
land may be held by a Conservation Authority for use on capital projects subject to notifying
MNR.
They are defining capital projects as:
. acquisition of Provincially Significant Conservation Lands
. acquisition of other ecologically significant lands including valley lands, hazard lands,
forested areas, headwater recharge and discharge areas, wetlands, and any other
lands which support provincial interests
. major maintenance of flood control structures
. hazard land mapping and watershed/subwatershed studies
. flood and erosion capital projects
E. Acquisition Prioritiu
The dynamics of the market place, the dynamics and mixture of land uses (ie: urban,
urbanizing and rural) and the variety and nature of the greenspace components (Lake
Ontario Waterfront, ESA's, Valley and Stream Corridors, Hazard Lands, Greenspace
Linkages, Recharge/Discharge areas, etc.), within our Region, combined with limited
resources make it very difficult to establish priorities for the general acquisition program.
In determining where acquisition is to be used to protect greenspace lands, the following are
taken into consideration:
(a) the availability of funding for both purchase and ongoing maintenance;
(b) the availability of alternatives to acquisition;
(c) the ability of the Authority or other agencies to conserve the lands;
(d) the nature and immediacy of a threat to the lands;
(e) the significance of the lands to the greenspace system;
(f) the relationship of a specific property to those already in public ownership and the
potential to complete linkages;
(g) the willingness of the owner to enter into negotiations;
(h) the ability to achieve an equitable geographic distribution of greenspace;
(I) the specific interests of the funding partners/sources;
(j) the availability of access to the property;
(k) the degree of flood and erosion risk;
(I) the ability to complete the land assembly in a defined area by acquiring the remaining
property(s), i.e (Westerly spit of Frenchman's Bay)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE#11J96, DECEMBER 13,1996 8640
The Authority currently maintains information on a large number of properties within our
Master Plan for Acquisition and has formulated a list of active sites or pool of higher priority
sites, based on the above criteria for bringing forward sites we wish to acquire. The pool of
priorities is updated on a regular basis in order to keep abreast of changing conditions.
Attached is a list of our current pool of priority acquisition sites.
The Authority should continue to acquire fee simple interests in parcels of greenspace lands
for a nominal sum through the development process or through land donations provided
they are within our Master Plan for acquisition. In addition we should continue to acquire
fee simple interests in land through exchanges or, acquire easements or enter into
stewardship agreements to further the greenspace objectives, as deemed appropriate.
These routine transactions are for the most part driven by external market forces and will be
brought forward as they occur. The purchase of fee simple interests is dependent on the
availability of funding and requires that the most suitable lands which may be on the market
each year will be the lands which are acquired.
Report prepared by:
Don Prince, extension 221
Ron Dewell, extension 245
8841 EXECUTIVE COMMIn:EE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
GREENSPACE
PROTECI'ION AND ACQUlSmON PROJECT
POOL OF PRIORITY ACQmsmON SITES
AS OF OCTOBER, 1996
WATERSHEDI REGIONAL LOCAL LOCATIONI RATIONAL
RESOURCE MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPALITY NAME
FEATURE
WATERFRONT Metro Etobicoke Etobicoke Apt - waterfront open space
Strip
Metro Etobicoke Etobicoke Motel - waterfront open space
Strip (Specific and greenspace link
Project)
Metro Scarborough Brady Property - remaining property
required for waterfront
open space link
Metro Scarborough GreY Abbey - waterfront open space
Metro Scarborough Springbank Ave. - 2 properties threatened by
erosion
Metro Scarborough Guildwood Ave. . 1 property threatened by
erosion
Metro Scarborough Fishleigh Ave. - 1 property threatened by
erosion
Metro Scarborough #1 Midland Ave. - 1 property threatened by
erosion
Metro Scarborough Chesterson - remaining shoreline
Shores Area properties required for
open space link
Durham Pickering Rodd - 7 remaining shoreline
A venuelBella properties required for
Vista Area waterfront open space
Durham Pickering FaiIport Beach . 5 remaining properties
Area required for waterfront
open space and trail link
:
,
;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8642
WATERSHEDI REGIONAL LOCAL LOCATIONI RATIONAL
RESOURCE MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPALITY NAME
FEATURE
Durham Pickering Frenchman's Bay - remaining shoreline
Area properties required for
waterfront open space
Durham Ajax Pickering Beach - 6 remAining properties
Area required for waterfront
open space and trail link
Durham Ajax Carruthers - environmentally sensitive
Marsh and required for waterfront
and stream corridor open
space
ETOBICOKE PeellMetro Mississaugal South of the - flood plain and valley
CREEK Etobicoke Queensway open space
MIMICO Metro Etobicoke OakdaleITizzard - flood plain and valley
CREEK open space
HUMBER Metro Etobicoke Karfilis Property - ESA and valley open
RIVER space
Metro Y orklNorth York St. Phillips Road - properties required for
Area valley open space and trail
link
Metro North York #19 Fairglen - 1 property threatened by
Ave. erosion
Metro North York St. Basits - flood plain and valley
open space
Metro North York Lund Property - flood plain, valley open
space and required for trail
link
Metro North York BoychuklHerod/ - 3 properties required for
Bailey Properties valley open space and trail
link
Metro North York Freedman - 2 properties required for
Properties valley open space and trail
link
Metro Etobicoke Peachy Property - valley open space and
trail link
York Vaughan Broda Drive - flood wlnerable sites
Area
B643 EXECUTIVE COMMITT.EE '11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
WATERSHED/ REGIONAL LOCAL LOCATION/ RATIONAL
RESOURCE MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPALITY NAME
FEATURE
York Vaughan Marlbloom - protection ofESA and
valley corridor
Peel Caledon Allen Property - flood wlnerable site
Peel Caledon Palgrave Area - flood plain and valley
open space linking
Authority lands
Peel Caledon Glen Haffy - purchase of a headwater
area (spring) to maintain
fishery
DON RIVER Metro North York Flemingdon Golf - flood plain and valley
Course open space linking public
. . lands within the Sauriol
Reserve
Metro North York Granite - flood plain and valley
Club/Crescent openspace and protection
School of an ESA
Metro North York St. Bernards - flood plain and trail link
Metro North York Don Valley Blvd - flood vulnerable sites
York Vaughan MNR Maple -flood plain and valley
lands
IUGHLAND/ Metro Scarborough Buchholz - valley openspace linking
CENTENNIAL Property public lands
CREEK
Metro Scarborough Former Brancato - valley openspace linking
Property public lands
ROUGE RIVER Durham Pickering Bella Vista - valley openspace and
Drive Area greenspace link
York Markham Little Rouge - flood plain and valley
River openspace
(Agriculture
Prese1ve)
PElTICOAT Durham Pickering Rivett Property - protection of an ESA
CREEK (Altona Forest
Specific Project)
II
I
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 ~ B644
WATERSHED! REGIONAL LOCAL LOCATION! RATIONAL
RESOURCE MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPALITY NAME
FEATURE
YorkIDurham Markham! Petticoat Creek - flood plain and valley
Pickering (Agriculture openspace
Preserve)
DUFFINS Durham Pickering Whitevale - valley openspace and
CREEK Corridor ESA protection of an ESA
(Agriculture
Preserve)
NIAGARA Peel Caledon Stewart Property - Niagara Escarpment
ESCARPMENT lands
LANDS!
HEADWATERS
Yode Richmond Hill Bond Lake - Kettle lake and an ESA
York Richmond Hill Lake Wilcox - ESA and headwaters of
Bog the Rouge
Durham Uxbridge Glen Major Inn - ESA and headwaters of
Property the Duffins
Durham Uxbridge Timbers - ESA and headwaters of
Property the Duffins
Durham Uxbridge Secord Property - 23ESA and headwaters of
theDuffins
GENERAL Additional link up, flood vulnerable or environmentally sensitive properties that come available
AREAS during the term of the project that can be acquired as a result of or with assistance of the
Planning Act
B645 EXECUTIVE COtlf.1lTTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1998
- --. --.
I -. - . ~
. I
..
a
ii 1
a
d 41
J. .
;1 .. .
: j - .
A Q ..0 J: ~
- .41.8 . 0
= ~..s:! ....
) DI .JI!-j . =
a. .:5
- ~:i~.'; .....
r-. 0_111:'. .;~
5::!:sI~ =2< I
JiI.CIIl.. .. tJ
...... JiI,: JiI,,s;
~:!o:!ca:!:;
~D<l1<O
=t)
0 0
... .~
~ 0
c.J ....
B~o
0=0
....00
~ __ N
~
0-- I
c.J .~ \0
ca::SO'\ I
~~O'\
=c.J....-4 .
0<
: e~
l II
0 fa I
.
j I
1 .
1
,
I
, -
,-
::" -+-
- .
-.
-
0
-
-..... -..--
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'1J96, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B646
---.. - -
I
,
I
IS
N ',a ·
&l i 1] i
.. ._ _ .c
= 2.2 ~ 11 "i i
DJl @l~lje!l~
.-
r. 5 ! ~ < :o.b 8 <
..tJ"iSB tJ
.S! .c ~:= ~ !l ~ i
iff .g. ~
~ Adl.. I
<<II <D I
I
!
;
.
I
t
t
:
,
I
e~ ~)
-'"
Cl.).-
......- ..c:
OOtIJ
~....
~~
Cl.) ~
00
~~ J
00(1) .
d~
QJ 0 :l
Cl.)....
;....c~
0 .
.- I
::- -+- - ,
-
~
-
0
-
-
B647 EXECUTIVE COMMITT~E#11196, DECEMBER 13,1996
RES. #8185/96- TOMMY THOMPSON PARK
Supply of Sand for Habitat Creation Projects
Quotations were received for the supply of sand material for the habitat
creation projects at Tommy Thompson Park, City of Toronto.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the quotation for the SUpplV and delivery of sand to Tommy Thompson Park from Lee
Sand and Gravel Limited be accepted at a total cost of $69,336 including G.S.T. .......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
RATIONALE
Invitations to quote on the supply and delivery of approximately 12,000 tonnes of clean
sand fill material were sent to six suppliers. The material is required at Tommy Thompson
Park and graded as part of the habitat creation projects in Embayment C and the vicinity of
Hardpoint 6.
The quotations received are as follows:
Quoted Unit Prices (per tonne)
by tandem by triaxle by trailer
Gormley Sand & 3ravel No bid No bid No bid
James Dick Cons~. Ltd. 10.75 10.75 8.35
Lee Sand & Grave, 6.90 6.90 5.40
Sandhill Aggregates 7.25 6.75 6.25
Vicdom Sand & Gravel 7.81 7.31 6.31
Warden Construction No bid No bid No bid
The lowest cost for supply and delivery by tractor-trailer is from Lee Sand and Gravel
Limited at the unit price of $5.40 per tonne for a total cost of $64,800 (excluding GST).
The unit prices include the Provincial Sales Tax but do not include the G.S.T.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available under the Tommy Thompson Park Habitat Creation/Restoration Projects
1996-97 in Accounts Nos. 113-54 and -55.
Report prepared by:
Nigel Cowey, ext. 244
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13,1996 8648
RES. #B186/96 - BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE
Architect for Capital Restoration Project
Progress report on BCPV capital campaign and request for approval
without tender to continue architectural services.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT approval be given to award contracts not to exceed $95.000 for architectural
services for the restoration of BCPV buildings to Phillip Goldsmith and Company Ltd..
Architects as part of the BCPV Restoration Project.1997 - 1998. and subject to availability
of funding from the Black Creek Pioneer Village Restoration Project;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto
including the signing of documents. ................................ CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Meeting # 2/95 of the Executive Committee. Resolution # E27/95 was passed approving
the consultant selection of Philip Goldsmith and Company Ltd. Architects. to conduct the
architectural conservation assessment for Black Creek Pioneer Village which forms the
current $1.4 million capital restoration project. Terms of reference were developed to
conduct the condition assessment of the historic buildings at Black Creek in dire need of
repair. Six restoration architectural firms were short listed for this project based on their
previous experience and expertise in restoration of heritage buildings. Three firms submitted
detailed proposals. went through a critical selection process. with the project awarded to
Philip Goldsmith and Company Ltd.. Architects.
The work involved in this first phase of the capital project included a thorough review of all
existing building drawings. plans. historical documentation and research material. site
investigation, identification of restoration construction work required (tasks in order of
magnitude and preliminary cost estimates) and creation of a building maintenance plan for
ongoing maintenance following completion of the restoration. From the results of this
phase, staff and the Conservation Foundation Of Greater Toronto, focused the $1.4 million
project and capital campaign program, which is now well underway.
The Campaign Chair, Greg Sorbara, is now in place, along with three committees (Burwick,
Stong, and Doctor's House) actively soliciting funds from a wide range of businesses and
individuals. The campaign has received a lead gift of $40,000 from Mr. Fred DeGasperis of
Metrus. In a recent meeting with Mr. DeGasperis, he has agreed to increase his support for
the project by:
1) contacting and encouraging other developers to contribute,
2) sourcing construction materials from suppliers at cost or as donations, which will
bring down the overall project cost. Mr. DeGasperis requires the restoration project
specifications and materials lists be provided to him by mid-January.
The opportunity of project assistance, partnership, and likely cost savings, has an immediate
time frame and requires architectural services. In order to avoid undermining what we have
B649 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
spent getting the project to this stage, having already gone through the selection process
for a restoration architect, and recognizing the selected architect's now extensive project
knowledge, BCPV requests approval without tender to continue the services of Philip
Goldsmith and Company Ltd., Architect, including detailing restoration construction
requirements and implementation, through contract documents and construction phase.
Phillip Goldsmith has completed successfully extensive work for the Authority and Metro
Toronto on the Toronto Brickworks Restoration Project.
WORK TO BE DONE
Work to be done includes detailed specifications and restoration implementation plans for
the Burwick House, Doctor's House, and Stong complex. The work will only be done as
restoration campaign funds are raised. Priority is completion of the Burwick House
architectural drawings by January 1997, because of the urgency of this project and the
involvement of a lead donor and the constituency he brings.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Architectural services have been included in the capital campaign budget for each building
at an estimated amount of 11 % of restoration cost. Individual contracts will be awarded
with successive work subject to satisfactory completion of prior contract services.
The cost to deliver the Burwick House restoration specifications, required by mid January,
will be approximately $28,000. As the work proceeds, it is anticipated that a further
$12,000 in fees will be incurred.
Anticipated to be done in the spring of 1997, the cost of architectural services for the
Doctor's House is about $7,500. The amount is less than the architectural costs of the
other buildings because most of the work involves outside landscaping as opposed to
building restoration.
The Stong complex includes the First house, Second House and Barns. The cost of this
restoration is estimated at $450,000 and will extend into 1998. Architectural fees for the
Stong complex will be about $40,000.
The funds to cover this and all other necessary architectural services will be raised in 1997
through the CFGT campaign for BCPV. Funding for the initial $28,000 is available and all
future contracts will be awarded only as funding is achieved.
Report prepared by:
Marty Brent, ext. 403
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8650
RES. #8187/96 - CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA
Call for Public Use Proposals South of Steeles Avenue
Call for proposals to develop public uses in the Claireville Conservation
Area south of Steeles Avenue. (See attached map).
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT the Monson Design Build proposal for the Claireville Conservation Area south of
Steeles Avenue not be considered further and the proponent be so advised.
AND FURTHER THAT the preferred public use proposal within the Claireville Conservation
Area. south of Steeles Avenue be brought back to the Conservation and Related Land
Management Advisory Board for further consideration. ................... CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Meeting #3/96, held on April 26, 1996, the Authority endorsed Resolution #A66/96
which states in part:
"THA T staff be directed to invite proposals to develop public uses in the Claireville
Conservation Area south of Steeles A venue ".
A meeting was held with members of the community on May 16, 1996, to discuss the
terms of reference to request proposals for public uses south of Steeles Avenue in the
Claireville Conservation Area. Their comments were incorporated and the Request for
Proposals was advertised. A large sign was posted on the site. A notice was put in the
Globe and Mail and Daily Commercial News. The Request for Proposals was mailed to
thirty-five addresses including private businesses and municipalities.
An information session was hosted by staff on July 16, 1996. Twelve individuals attended.
An overview of the property was provided, the process was discussed and staff answered
questions from the attendees.
The deadline for proposals was August 22, 1996. Three concepts were received.
The three proposals are briefly described below:
World Pitch and Putt
Pitch and Putt is a variation of the game of golf with its own set of rules and regulations.
The rules of the game stipulate that individual holes cannot exceed 75 yards and that the
total course length be less than 1090 yards. Players are allowed only two clubs - a putter
and an iron. A complete game takes about an hour to play and greens fees average
$10.00/person. The proposal includes:
. 18 hole pitch and putt golf course occupying approximately 6 acres.
. Driving range with flood lights.
B651 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13,1996
. 3,000 sq. ft. building containing a clubhouse with a small licensed restaurant.
. Barbecue area.
. Car parking (approximately 1 00 cars).
The Golf Dome
The operation would be almost identical to the facility owned by the same company in the
Town of Markham. The busy season is from December to March at the Dome. The driving
range and mini putt components help to offset the slowdown in Dome activity during the
warm weather months. Retail pricing for the use of the Dome is $25/hour. The summer
range prices are $10.50/bucket. The proposal includes:
. A climate controlled air-supported 65,000 sq. ft. dome enclosing an indoor driving
range with 72 stalls on two levels.
. Outdoor driving range.
. 18 hole mini-putt.
. 5,000 sq. ft. pro shop.
. 3,000 sq. ft. clubhouse with small licensed restaurant facilities.
. Car parking (approximately 75 cars).
Monson Design Build
Monson Design Build is a project management company proposing to build a multi-purpose
facility including:
. Enclosing Wild Water Kingdom with walls and roof to permit four season activity.
. Four storey motel.
. Farmers market.
. Service Plaza.
. Recreational vehicle home park.
. Recreational pavilion with a day care facility, playdium centre arcade and multi-
purpose area.
. Equestrian complex.
. Sports playing fields, numerous trails.
. Linking Indian Line Campground to Wild Water Kingdom.
. Development of the reservoir as the local fishing canoeing, kayaking and skating
centre.
The subject area is currently licensed to Wild Water Kingdom on a yearly basis as part of
their lease agreement with the Authority; however, they did not submit a proposal to
develop additional public'use facilities at this location. Staff did stress to the other
proponents that any public use development on the site must be complementary to the
existing Wild Water Kingdom facilities.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13,1996 8652
At Meeting #9/96, held on October 25, 1996, the Authority endorsed Resolution #A211/96
which states:
"THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THA T the staff report on the
public use proposals for the Claire vi lie Conservation Area south of Steeles A venue be
received;
THA T staff be directed to continue to work with Wild Water Kingdom and the
proponents of the Pitch and Putt, Golf Dome and Monson Design Build proposals and
apply the Phase 1 concept review process of the Strategy for Public Use of
Conservation Authority Land (1995) when evaluating the concepts;
THA T staff be directed to consult with other agencies, interest groups and the public
to get input regarding the suitability of the proposed public use concepts;
AND FURTHER THA T the preferred public use proposal within the Claireville
Conservation Area, south of Steeles A venue be brought back to the Conservation
and Related Land Management Advisory Board for further consideration.
Staff has completed a preliminary review of the three concepts. A public meeting was also
held on November 18, 1996. Seven members of the Claireville Conservation Area
Management Plan Technical Advisory Committee attended. No individuals from the general
community were present.
Staff recommend the Monson Design Build proposal not be considered further for the
following reasons:
. The proposal included very few details to assess the viability of the concept.
Details would only be forthcoming once a partnership is confirmed.
. No business plan was provided.
. The suggested concept did not meet the criteria in terms of use and land
requirements as specified in the Request for Proposals.
. The proposal involved high intensity commercial development and was not
recreation based. The large scale of the project was considered incompatible
with the goals and objectives of the MTRCA.
I
B653 EXECUTIVE COMMITT~E #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
. Continue to work with the proponent(s) of the Pitch and Putt and Golf Dome
proposals to investigate the public use concepts further.
. Initiate the Phase 2 - Design Review process as outlined in the Strategy for Public
Use of Conservation Authority Lands (1995). The following design and information
items may be required.
- Demonstration of minimal change to the features, functions and landforms
associated with the natural heritage system or with cultural heritage
resources,
- Economic analysis of the proposal including proposed funding sources and
detailed costs of development and operation,
- Public consultation on the proposal, its impacts and design alternative,
- Integration of the proposal into corridor reach plans to complement other
public uses or other Authority program objectives, and
- Compliance with relevant provincial legislation.
. Report the details of the design review to the Authority.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
All proponents have been advised that the Authority will not be responsible for any costs
related to the preparation or implementation of the proposed developments.
Potential financial returns to the Authority are still being explored by staff.
Report prepared by:
Gary Wilkins, ext. 211
For information contact:
Bob Burchett, ext. 367
EXECUTIVE COtNIlTTEE iJ11196, DECEMBER 13. 1996 8854
-= .,
.3.3
.-
..
- ~. -
O. ......
~a -
.0
&.. .
A
,
i
I
~ .
~ ;
L. 1
< I
C en J
~ v
o aU:
- N .il
.. al
~ - ~~
~ c U
~ .-
E ~a
~ ~ .
U) ..2 I
C ~ ; !
o ~ -':
" Q ;
~ ~ '
~ '
~ en _ I
= 0 ~
.- c.. :s: I
>0;
~ ~ I
~ Cl. g I
._ ~ I
~ ~ I I
- 8: I
" . I
! ~ e
:I
i iii I
. c
I ~
! .a I
: -
J ;- . e:
I '2 e c.
. ~ 3 e~ -
. = e . 0- C
. a - . -at: ..
· ".~ .... ~ CIIIE
< 1 ~ ~ . iii.!i...so =
~:: :ot..:! 1: - ~g'1:JO
c~ -~3.. ~ ~:I~~
C ;=!~~~Uii !.~..!!~~~ I
Z '::==.;;~"~.~i- CD~........
- - - ~ ~ - ~. - --
W .. -=.., :: ~ " · :: - ~ -~..
a'W')oo,Q5':~- o. oS 0--
<.:) a::: = :.J <:I ~ Z ~U % ~ -'=~~:!3 _
w ~>>~n,,>~.nr;r ~~~a~~ J
-J ',.....~L~IIUE w. . . . .
B655 EXECUTIVE COMM~E #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
-----~-" A : R C H 0----
1 ~ ~~ ~_ CTlat TO Eo LEAN ~ ~---
1
.- ".. -"." ..... --~
-. " -- - "- . ,. -:1'
t~.:.:...!. ,~:'-." ,:o::7iu
-' . -- -
28 November, 1998
NOV 2 9 tqqn
Craig Mather,
Chief Adm;nis~ra~iv8 O~~1cer
IITRCA ~ "'~I"f :\ri_:_:.-~~- Qffic"
\MAull ft....a..;~:_:.. w...:.;. tl 4i
5 Shoreham Drive "
Dawnsvi ew. ON M:3N 54 .
,
Re.: Qevelopmeh~ Proposals for Cla1revile Conserva~ion Area.
;
D.ar Craig: 1
I
l~ is very d1~f1CU'~ ~o form an 1n~.l'igent ogin1on on ~h~ three
proposals with t;J; scant info..mation Shown a~ ~h. Public
Info..mation Meetin~ of Navemb... la.
An 1-..d1a~e r4..c1:ion is ~a reeo_end that IIOr. deta; 18
be invited for~ ~ur-1:her cons1d.ra~ion frQlll the proponen1:s
o~ the War 1 d ~; tc:h and Pu~~ on 1 y. suggest; ng that they
reduce thai r 1and .-"qui r8lll.n~3 and ensure unreS1:ric1:ed
pub 11 c access 'to 'the .....rvo; r and ~. West Huaaber.
The other two proposals -Golf Dame, and Monson Design Build- seem
inappropriate. and:1 would like to restate pa..t of our earlie..
submission of June~. 1998 to Ken Owen as a basis:
....... t"
1. The hi;hes~ p..i r;~i.s far the Clairevil'e Congerva~10n lands
should be the pro~e tion and enhancement of their natural heritage "
value, as a publicibenefit to ourselves. our children and fu~ure
;enera-tions", This 1. consistent with the basic underlying principle
identified as 'the foundation far any land use'. in the MTRCA
'Strategy fa.. Pub'1~ Use of Conservation Authority Lands' adop~ed
by the MTRCA in J~nua!"y 1995, Clairev;lle is and w111 be lIIost ,
· valuable to the publiC as "natural'.
.......... I
. 4. We undars~and. ~ however. the implications of seve!"e funding
. cutbacks and we wI sh to assi 3t the. MTRCA to be an .ffec~ i 'Ie
i provide!" of cons~!"vatiQn and wa~e!"shed management services;
: 'ther.fore re'uc~an1:1y. and in the spirit of compromise, we are
tl wi 1 1 i ng to consi der' revenue-p..oduci ng uses of ONE 1I0re parcel. the
SE carner of Stee'~s-Finch. We strongly recommend restricting the
I development to the:sma1les~ possible area closest to the corner.
We expect to par~;dipatQ in the evaluation steps.
I i
! !
;
! i
.
I
Luciano Martin. I
Executiv~ D;recto..~
j
I
"I
21 TAYSHAAf CRES erpezCOKE ON. MW lXl 7EL: (41G)7.fT-$Jo4e HX: ("'07747~
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8656
RES. #B188/96 - YORK REGION LONG TERM WATER PROJECT - OCTOBER 1996
Class Environmental Assessment - Summary of Alternatives
Receipt of a summary report on alternative solutions to long term water
supply for the Region of York and potential impacts on policies and
programs of the Authority.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT the staff report regarding the Region of York Long Term Water Supply Project, Class
Environmental Assessment - Summary of Altematives, dated December 4, 1996, be
received;
THAT a copy of the report be forwarded to the Region of York and Consumers Utilities as
the Authority's preliminary comments with respect to the proposed project;
THAT staff be directed to pursue these concems with the proponents and to report on this
matter to the Water and Related Land Management Advi~ory;
AND FURTHER THAT representatives from the Region of York and Consumers Utilities be
invited to be present at the Advisory Board meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
To accommodate projected future growth in the Region of York, in September 1995, the
Region invited proposals for a public/private partnership to develop and implement a long
term water supply strategy. In March 1996, Consumers Utilities was selected as the
Region's private sector partners. In July 1996, staff received a notice of this project and
identified that it would be of interest to the Authority and that we wanted to be kept
informed. We have now received the York Region Long Term Water Project, October 1996,
Class Environmental Assessment - Summary of Alternatives. Comments on the alternatives
are requested by December 7, 1996 to be inc(;"porated into a report to Regional Council on
December 19, 1996 recommending a preferred alternative.
In reviewing the summary document staff has identified the !oUowing concerns:
. the use of the Class Environmental Assessment process for a project of this potential
magnitude;
. the impact of .this proposal on growth and settlement patterns in York Region and on the
watershed management interests of the Authority, including storm water management;
B657 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
. the consideration of alternatives that involve a diversion of water from one lake basin to
another, (i.e. Georgian Bay Independent; Georgian Bay with expanded Metro Supply);
. the potential environmental impacts of the routing of the proposed pipelines on the natural
environment resource base, particularly the valley and stream corridors and the Oak Ridges
Moraine, and the potential impacts on any Authority owned lands. The Authority has had
an opportunity to review and comment on any of the background technical reports that
address potential impacts on the natural environment;
. how the overall water supply strategy meets the relevant objectives of the Authority's
watershed management strategies, (i.e. 40 Steps to a New Don; legacy: A Strategy for a
Healthy Humber) and further, how the water supply strategy meets the goals and
objectives of the Metro Region Remedial Action Plan; and
. the proposed methods of treating and managing wastewater.
The summary report does not provide sufficient information to assess the proposed alternatives in
light of Authority program and policy objectives for managing the natural environment on a
watershed basis.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Given the magnitude of this project and its potential impacts, staff needs an opportunity to review
the relevant technical reports. We would also require an opportunity to meet with the Region of
York and Consumers Utilities to understand the proposals and the scope of the review and
analysis undertaken in their development.
Once we have had an opportunity to review the background information we will be able to bring a
report forward to our Water and Related land Management Advisory Board for further direction.
The next scheduled meeting of the Board is January 17, 1996. Representatives of the Region
and Consumer Utilities would be invited to attend the Advisory Board meeting.
For information contact:
Alyson Deans ext. 269
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8658
RES. #B189/96 - MAPLE DOWNS GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB
City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed
Minor Exemption to the Region of York Trees By-law TR-1-91-154.
Approval of an application for Minor Exception to the Region of York
Trees By-law TR-1-91-154 to permit the expansion of the Maple Downs
Golf & Country Club in the City of Vaughan, partially encroaching within
the McGill Area Environmentally Significant Area (ESA 73) also
designated by the Province as an Area of Natural & Scientific Interest
(ANSI).
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT the report be received and no further action be taken on the appeal for the minor
exception to the Region's Tree By-law;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report on the protection of the remaining ESA lands.
AMENDMENT
RES. #B190/96
Moved by: Joan King
Seconded by: Lorna Bissell
THAT Authority staff meet with the Region of York to find ways to strengthen the status of
Environmentally Significant Areas with the Region of York's Official Plan;
AND FURTHER THAT staff discuss issues regarding the Region's Tree By-law and report
back at a later date.
THE AMENDMENT WAS . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS ..................... CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Executive Committee Meeting #11/94, held January 13, 1995, staff was directed to
appear as a delegation before the Transportation & Environmental Services Committee of
the Region of York objecting to the Minor Exemption application by the Maple Downs Golf &
Country Club, and to report back to the Executive Committee providing a status update
regarding any decision on this matter. (Resolution #E214/94)
The application was initially reviewed at a public hearing held before the Transportation &
Environmental Services Committee on January 17, 1995 and then continued at a further
meeting of the Committee on May 30, 1995. The meeting was subsequently adjourned
pending the submission of additional information by the applicant to address the viability of
a possible land exchange to accommodate the expansion, and was once again in front of
the Committee on November 6, 1996. Authority staff, as well as staff from the Ministry of
B659 EXECUTIVE COMMITT.EE#11I96, DECEMBER 13,1996
Natural Resources and a number of area residents appeared at each of these meetings as
deputations in opposition to the application.
RATIONALE
As noted above, the Minor Exception Application to the Tree's By-law by Maple Downs Golf
& Country Club was reconvened in front of the Transportation & Environmental Services
Committee of the Region of York on November 6, 1996. At this meeting, the
Transportation & Environmental Services Committee was presented with all the relevant
information pertaining to the application and the resultant impacts to the Environmentally
Significant Area (ESA) and the Area of Natural & Scientific Interest (ANSI).
Efforts were made by the applicant to address the issues brought forward by Authority
staff, and proposed a redesign of the holes in this area in an attempt to reduce the amount
of intrusion. The original application proposed to encroach into approximately 7.4 acres of
the ESA, whereas the redesign reduced the intrusion by approximately 1.5 acres to a total
of approximately 5.9 acres. Although the redesign resulted in reduced impact, any intrusion
beyond the existing edge communities results in a substantial risk to the sensitive habitat to
the east, both on and off the Maple Downs property. As a result of size and configuration,
the function of this habitat block is extremely susceptible to the loss of interior forest
function.
The lands subject to this application are currently zoned OS2 - Open Space Park which
permits golf course uses. The expansion of the golf course is in conformity with the current
zoning of the property, and would not require further planning approvals from the City of
Vaughan to facilitate the additional holes. However, the Region of York Official Plan
designates portions of the Maple Downs property as an Environmental Priority Area, as
Significant Forest Cover and as part of the Regional Greenlands System. The Region's
Official Plan sets out a number of performance standards which need to be achieved, with
the intent to ensure that significant environmental features and functions are preserved.
Notwithstanding that the Maple Downs property is currently zoned to allow a golf course,
the Region's Official Plan requires that even where development is in conformity with
previously approved municipal plans and zoning by-laws, the effect of the development will
not degrade or otherwise adversely affect the environmental significance of the area. It was
the opinion of Regional Legal, Planning and Transportation & Works Department staff that
this proposal is subject to the environmental policies of the Region's Official Plan, and that
the Minor Exception application by Maple Downs is not in conformance with this document.
It was the decision of the Committee to approve the Minor Exemption application, in
keeping with a re-designed proposal which had been supported by Council of the City of
Vaughan. Subsequently, Council of the Region of York adopted a by-law approving the
application to facilitate the construction of the additional holes on the Maple Downs
property. There is no formal appeal mechanism pursuant to the Tree's Act, and no other
approvals are required to facilitate the works under either the Planning Act or the
Conservation Authorities Act.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8660
It should also be noted that these same lands are the subject of a referral to the City of
Vaughan Official Plan (OPA 400) to facilitate the development of a 17 lot estate residential
plan of subdivision. Authority staff previously reported on this matter to the Authority, and
have obtained participant status along with the City of Vaughan and Region of York. This
matter has currently been adjourned pending the resolution of the application under the
Tree's By-law; the applicant has advised Council at the Region of York and City of Vaughan
that approval of the Minor Exception application would result in the withdrawal of the draft
plan of subdivision referral to the Ontario Municipal Board.
Authority staff are concerned with the possible ramifications related to the approval of the
decision by the Region regarding the Minor Exception application, which could set a
precedent related to development proposals within ESA's, and lead to increased
development pressures associated with these significant natural resources. Currently there
are two other planning applications in this general vicinity which propose to encroach within
this ESA, of which one is the subject of an upcoming Ontario Municipal Board hearing
related to a proposed aggregate extraction proposal immediately north of the Maple Downs
Golf & Country Club.
In light of the fact that there is no formal appeal mechanism under the Region of York's
Tree By-law or the Trees Act itself, staff have spoken with the Authority's solicitors
regarding legal options, and have been advised of three alternatives for advancing a legal
argument on this matter; an application to quash, judicial review, or prosecution. Given that
these options have not been fully explored and that further discussions with Regional staff
would facilitate a recommendation on this matter, a further report will be brought forward
for the consideration of the Executive Committee.
Report prepared by: Luch Ognibene, ext. 284
B661 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/96, DECEMBER 13, 1996
RES. #8191/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION
158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the
Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be
constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a
Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or
on such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river,
creek, stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Lorna Bissell
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(7.6.1. - 7.6.12) which are listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
(7.6.1 )Thomas Randall Milligan
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 28, Concession 2 EHS, (4636 King Street-
Campbells Cross), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 6.7 metre by 6.7 metre detached garage within the Regional
Storm flood plain of the Kilmanagh Creek.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
with the fallowing documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan prepared by the applicant; received November 4, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
(2) Structural Detail Drawings prepared by Cash way Building Centres, dated March 1,
1996; received November 4, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
(3) Letter received from Thomas Randall Milligan dated and received November 27,
1996. (Total Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8662
Proposal:
The proposal consists of constructing a detached garage immediately to the south of the
existing dwelling located within the flood plain. The proposed garage site is also situated
within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Kilmanagh Creek. No fill placement is proposed
as part of the construction.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed garage site is located outside the hydraulic flood way . The structure will be
wet floodproofed and all electrical fixtures, outlets and equipment will be installed above the
expected Regional Storm flood level.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is anticipated during construction.
Conservation of Land:
The building site is situated within a wide stream corridor, with no defined valley slope
evident along this portion of the Kilmanagh Creek.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28287 Application #:222/96/CAL
For information contact: George Leja, ext. 342
Date: 1996.11.28
(7.6.2)Ms. Nancy Stewart
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 13, Concession 5, (Duffy's Lane), in
the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to place fill for lot grading purposes in a fill regulated area of the Humber
River.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by applicant; received by MTRCA November 19, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To place approximately 200 cubic metres of fill in a regulated area of the Humber River in
order to level a depression on an existing lot.
B663 EXECUTIVE COMMITT~E #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
Control of Flooding:
The proposed fill is located outside the Regional Storm floodplain of the Humber River.
Pollution:
The proposed fill is to be placed to level an existing depression. Sedimentation will be
controlled by a combination of lot grading and vegetated buffers.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed fill will be located approximately 15 metres from the top-of-bank of the
Humber Valley. Existing slope stability will not be affected.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in conformance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program (V&SMCP), Section 4.2.2.(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures.
CFN: 28301 Application #231/96/CAL
For information contact: Richard Lloyd. ext. 281
Date: 1996.11.26
(7.6.3)Acumen Investments Ltd.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Block 63, Registered Plan 65M-2846,
(Brasswinds Court), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake regrading works in a regulated area of the Rainbow Creek in
order to facilitate the development of a residential subdivision (19T-96V01).
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 2001 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; prepared by Ander Engineering Ltd; File no 96-107; Drawings 2. 4. and 5
dated August 1996; Drawing 28 dated October 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To undertake lot grading works in a fill regulated area of the Rainbow Creek (Humber River).
in order to facilitate the development of a residential plan or subdivision (19T-96V01). The
subdivision is located in a former school block that was part of a larger draft plan. The
regulated area impacts six of the lots within the plan.
Control of Flooding:
None of the lots are located within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Rainbow Creek.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13,1996 B664
Pollution:
Sediment Control is provided through a combination of sediment fencing on the perimeter of
the lots adjacent to the valley and by leaving an area at the rear of three of the lots
undisturbed.
Conservation of Land:
The works are in conformance with a geotechnical report for the overall draft plan of
subdivision.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Plan (V&SCMP), Section 4.1.1- New development.
CFN: 28233 Application #:213/96NAUG
For information contact: Richard Lloyd, ext.281
Date: 1996.11.13
(7.6.4)M.V. and Sons Construction limited
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, Registered Plan M-1303, (5
Bearwood Drive), in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill, for lot grading, in conjunction with the construction of a single
family dwelling.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan prepared by Frank Osredkar dated January 1995, revised August 4, 1995;
received November 13, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
(2) Typical cross-section Drawing prepared by M.V. and Sons Construction limited;
received November 22, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Pronosal:
The proposal consists of placing fill for lot grading purposes, as part of residential
development (ie: -single .family dwelling) of this vacant property. The grading work is
necessary to establish positive drainage away from the proposed dwelling; runoff will be
directed toward Bearwood Drive. The entire property is situated within the Fill Regulated
Area of the Humber River.
Control of Flooding:
The subject lands are located outside the Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River.
B665 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
Pollution:
No sedimentation is anticipated during construction.
Conservation of Land:
The property is situated on the valley floor within an established community; all filled and
disturbed areas will be sodded following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (G) - Infilling, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28299 Application #:228/96/ETOB
For information contact: George Leja, ext. 342
Date: 1996.11.28
(7.6.5)Bowan Developments Ltd.
To place fill within a regulated area and alter a watercourse on Part Lot 24,
Concession 2 EYS, (Bayview Avenue north of Cum mer Avenue), in the City of North
York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake regrading works in a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River (East
Branch) and construct a storm sewer outfall to the Don River (East Branch) in order to
facilitate the development of a residential subdivision (55T-94004).
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 2001 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Condeland Engineering Ltd; job no. 93-124; Drawing 93-124-01,
Sheets 3 of 3; Drawing 93-124-02, Sheets 3 of 4; Drawing 93-124-02, Sheets 4 of
4; Drawing 93-124-06, Sheets 1 of 2; Drawing 93-124-06, Sheets 2 of 2; Drawing
93-124-07, Sheets 3 of 3; all dated October 1996; received by MTRCA November
12, 1996. (Total Drawings 6)
(2) Plans; prepared by Landscape Planning Ltd; project no. 93-66; Drawing L3 revision 4;
dated March 9, 1996; Drawing RP1 dated November 1996. (Total Drawings 2)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To undertake minor lot grading on three lots and a cul-de-sac within a Fill Regulated Area of
the Don River (East Branch) and construct a storm sewer outfall to the Don River (East
Branch) in order to facilitate development of a residential subdivision (55T -94004) formerly
property owned by the Sisters of St.Joseph.
Control of Flooding:
The works will implement a proposed storm water management scheme for the proposed 61
lot residential subdivision. As a result of extensive discL'ssions between the Authority,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/96, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B666
North York, and Metro staff and the consultant, a storm water management plan has been
agreed to which involves the construction of two storm water detention cells to control
volume, and a combination of lot level controls (Best Management Practices) and
stormceptors to provide equivalent to quality control. Maintenance of the detention cells will
be assumed by the City of North York. The lots are located outside the flood plain of the
Don River (East Branch).
Pnlllltinn'
An erosion and sedimentation plan has been submitted which proposes two temporary
sediment ponds on the lots adjacent to the valley.
Cnn~Arv~tinn nf I ~nrt.
The proposed lots and road allowance are set back a minimum of 5 metres from the top of
bank ( 8 metres in one area) as established in a geotechnical report prepared for the site and
approved by Authority staff. The proponent has prepared a valleyland rehabilitation plan in
order to restore vegetated areas which will be disturbed during construction.
Pnlir.y r,lIirtAlinA~'
The proposed works are in conformance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program, Section 4.1.1 - New Development and Section 4.3 - Infrastructure
and Servicing.
CFN: 28107 Application #: 150/96/NY
For information contact: Richard lloyd, ext. 281
Date: 1996.11.15
(7 fi fi)DnmAnir. C~v~lIn
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 282, Registered Plan 3855, (14 Loney
Avenue), in the City of North York, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by same and MTRCA.
The purpose is to place fill to level a depression in the rear yard area of the property, within
the Fill Regulated Area of the Black Creek.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan submitted by the applicant; received October 23, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpn~al:
The proposal consists of placing 8 to 15 centimetres (3" to 6") of fill material to level a
depression in the backyard of this property. Partial filling has already taken place and a
B667 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/96, DECEMBER 13, 1996
Violation Notice was issued under Ontario Regulation 158 (File: V-1577). The Authority
owns the valley corridor abutting this area which is under management agreement with the
Metro Parks and Culture Department. A minor quantity of fill has encroached onto Authority
lands. Staff has discussed this matter with MTRCA Property Section staff and the
encroachment contact at Metro Parks and Culture. It was agreed that the fill placement
that has occurred within the Authority property would not compromise policy or program
interests due to its minor nature; however, the applicants property will be added to a list of
encroachments regarding the location of an existing, chain-link fence on Authority land.
Only the northern third of the backyard at this site is situated within the Fill Regulated Area
of the Black Creek.
Cnntrol nf Flnnding'
The applicant's property is located above the Regional Storm flood plain of the Black Creek.
Pnlllltinn'
No sedimentation has occurred to date, nor is any expected as part of further filling.
Cnm:p.rv;ltinn nf L ;Ind'
The area to be filled is situated on tableland, well away from the adjacent, stable valley wall
of the Black Creek. The final elevation of fill will match the neighbouring backyard levels
and grass sod will be placed to stabilize the filled area.
Pnlir.y Gllidp.linp.~'
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28234 Application #:215/96/NY
For information contact: George Leja. ext. 342
Date: 1996.11.26
(7 n 7)H;lrry ;lnd GIIP.I;I Rlld;l
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lots. 3 and 4, Registered Plan M-453. (21
Brookfield Road), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 6.7 x 5.5 metre (22 x 18ft). attached garage addition to an
existing residence in the floodplain of the West Don River.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12. 1998 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans; entitled Ruda Residence - Addition and Renovations; Drawings numbered A 1
to A6. dated September 25. 1996.
RA TIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
\
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13,1996 8668
Proposal:
To construct a garage addition to an existing residence in the York Valley community
(Hoggs Hollow) within the floodplain of the West Don River. The property is located in the
Hoggs Hollow special Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed addition is located above the 1 :350 year storm flood elevation and is
therefore dry-flood proofed above the minimum elevation specified in the special Policy Area
policies. The garage is also wet-flood proofed to the Regional storm elevation.
Pollution:
No fill or grade changes are proposed.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposed addition is in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program Section 4.2.1. - Development Within Established Communities and
I .
The City of North York Official Plan Amendment no. 375 - Hoggs Hollow Special Policy
Area.
CFN: 28290 Application #:223/96NAUG
For information contact: Richard Lloyd, ext.281
Date: 1996.11.15
(7.6.8lSuncor Incorcorated
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 8, Concession 3 (Humber Range) ,
(870 Jane Street), in the City of York, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material in conjunction with excavations involving remediation of
a former fuel and service station site, within the Fill Regulated Area of the Black Creek.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
n} Site Plan prepared by Jacques Whitford Environment Limited, Job No. 31494 dated
September 26, 1996; received November 18, 1996. (Total Plans 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating areas of contaminated soil within a former fuel and
service station site and backfilling the areas with clean fill. Only the remnant waste oil tank
excavation at the south end of the property is located within the Fill Regulated Area of the
Black Creek.
B669 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ##11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located above the Regional Storm flood plain of the Black Creek.
Pollution:
All contaminated fill material will be removed from the site and taken to a Ministry of
Environment and Energy (MOEE), approved treatment facility (Greensoils Ltd.)
Conservation of Land:
The waste oil tank is the closest area of excavation to the Black Creek valley corridor.
However, this site is situated on tableland, more than ten metres from the physical top-of-
bank. There is no sign of erosion along the valley wall at this location.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program and MOEE
site remediation guidelines.
CFN: 28295 Application #:225/96/YORK
For information contact: Gaorge Leja, ext. 342
Date: 1996.11.26
(7.6.9)Normerica Building Systems Inc.
To place fill in a regulated area on Part Lot 31, Concession 5, (4160 19th Ave.,
Almira), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a new septic bed and tile field in a fill regulated area and
partially in the flood plain.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Septic System Design for Part Lot 31, Concession 5, Town of Markham; prepared by
E.D. Roberts and Associates drawing # 95-1146-1 and 95-1146-2; received
November 29, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
As part of a proposal to create four new lots through a severance application, a new septic
bed and tile field is required to service an existing commercial structure. The existing septic
service is to be used on one of the other newly created lots. The proposed tile bed will
extend into the flood plain approximately 10 metres; however, there will be no change in
grade. The edge of the tile field will be approximately 45 metres from the watercourse.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8670
Through the development proposal, all of the remaining flood plain lands will be acquired by
the Town and will become part of the public open space system.
Control of Flooding:
As the grades in the flood plain will not be changing there will be no impact on the control
of flooding.
Pollution:
As the works are 40metres from the watercourse and the flood plain is flat, there is no risk
of sediment entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The existing site is an open field adjacent to an existing commercial parking lot. The works
are not in the riparian area and there is no significant resource feature on the site.
\ '
Opportunities to rehabilitate the stream corridor, on the lands to be in public ownership, will
be considered in the future.
,
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.3 Servicing and Infrastructure.
CFN: 28311 Application #:233/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, ext. 304
Date: 1996.12.02
(7.6.1 mSheridan Nurseries Ltd.
To place fill in a regulated area on Part Lot 10, Concession 5, (South side of Hwy #7,
East of Warden Ave), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on
property owned by s~me.
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area and the flood plain to replace an existing tile
field for a septic system.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Site Plan showing the location of the septic system and tile field prepared by
applicant from.Plan of.Survey Part Lot 10,-Concession. 5, Town of Markham, R. G.
McGibbon Ltd. , O.L.S., October 21, 1996; received November 21, 1996.
(2) Topographic details of the tile field and mantel, prepared by applicant; received
November 21, 1996.
(3) Cross-section of Leaching Bed, Sheridan Nurseries; prepared by Rural Development
Consultants Ltd.; received November 21, 1996.
B671 EXECUTIVE COMMITT.EE#11I96, DECEMBER 13,1996
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The existing septic system which services the retail building at the Sheridan Nurseries has
failed. It is currently located outside the flood plain between the retail building and Highway
# 7 and the applicant wishes to relocate it at the rear of the property. The site is also
above the Regional Storm flood elevation of 176.37 m and approximately 40 m from the
top of the stream bank.
The remainder of the site is currently being redeveloped with a new retail building
greenhouses and storage facilities. The proposed location of the septic system is the only
location currently available and also compatible with the proposed site modifications.
Control of Flooding:
As the works are outside of the flood plain there will be no impact on the control of
flooding.
Pollution:
There is an existing cedar hedge between the site of the tile field and the watercourse that
is to be retained. Sediments will not impact the watercourse.
Conservation of land:
The proposed tile field is approximately 40 metres from the watercourse and not within the
riparian area. Opportunities for riparian restoration will be investigated through the
redevelopment proposal and associated planning applications.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authorities Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28300 Application #:2~S'96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, ext. 304
Date: 1996.11.29
(7.6.11lCalvin G. Beamish
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 17, Registered Plan M657, (28 Hopecrest
Crescent), in the City of Scarborough, Don River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to level the rear yard on the subject site within the Fill Regulated Area and
Regional Storm Flood Plain~
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8672
(1) Site and Cross Section Detail Drawings no's 1 and 2; prepared by Calvin G. Beamish,
as received on October 21, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
ProDosal:
The applicant proposes to level the rear yard on the site by placing a maximum of 6 inches
of fill. The works once complete, will reduce ponding within the rear yard and allow for
easy maintenance of the existing manicured lawn. The rear yard will also be at an elevation
consistent with the elevation on the adjacent properties.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no measurable impact on the control of flooding as grade changes will be
contained with a 30 metre by 12 metre area to a maximum of 6 inches.
Pollution:
There will be no impact on the control of pollution as the site will be revegetated through
the use of sod.
Conservation of Land:
The works will not impact on the conservation of land as the site is currently utilized as a
manicured rear yard. The site is separate from the adjacent watercourse and valley feature
by a chain-link fence.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 - Existing Development, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28270 Application #:219/96/SCAR
For information contact: Russel White, ext.306
Date: 1996.11.19
(7.6.12lSuzanne Rose Blake,
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 18, Concession 1, (1760 Finch Ave. East of
Brock Road), in the Town of Pickering, Duffin Creek Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a minor addition to the existing residential structure within the
Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site and Elevation Details; Plan No. 96569; Sheets 1 and 2; prepared by Central
Drafting; received November 18, 1996.
B673 EXECUTIVE COMMITT~E.11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
(2) House Details; Plan No. 02; Sheets 1; prepared by Central Drafting; received
November 18, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to construct a 572 square feet addition to the existing 1056 square
feet residence within the Special Policy Area. An existing 200 square feet kitchen will be
removed to accommodate the proposed addition. The works will be flood-protected to the
500 year Flood Elevation. A basement addition is not proposed.
Control of Flooding:
The site is within the Special Policy Area and is protected by a Flood Control Berm,
previously constructed by MTRCA. There will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
There will be no impact on the control of pollution.
Conservation of land:
There will be no impact on the conservation of land as the site is within an urbanized area of
the Special Policy Area.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2 - Development within Special Policy Areas of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28296 Application #:226/96/PICK
For information contact: Russel White, &xt. 306
Date: 1996.11.20
RES. #8192/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
All information was received and recommendations for approval finalized
for the following applications that had been scheduled on the Agenda as
errata items:
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Joan King
THAT permits be granted In accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for those application
that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items (7.6.13 - 7.6.17) for which all the
required information was received and finalized as listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
(7.6. 13)Pratt and Whitney Canada Incorporated
To place fill within a regulated area on Block 1 and Part Block 3 , Registered Plan
M-339, (1801 Courtney Park Drive East), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8674
The purpose is to place fill for a new exit road from the existing employee parking area,
within the Fill Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
I
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) letter of Undertaking from Mr. Peter Brown, Senior Project Manager, Pratt &
Whitney Canada Inc.; dated November 27, 1996; received November 28, 1996.
(Total Documents 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of placing fill in conjunction with grading work for a new exit road
from the existing employee parking lot. The City of Mississauga has requested that a new
exit be constructed from the parking area to a side street along the west side of the
property (Van Deemter Court) to relieve traffic pressure on Courtney Park Drive East at the
Pratt and Whitney Plant main entrance. Only a portion of the roadway will occur within the
Fill Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed road is located above the Regional Storm flood plain of the Etobicoke Creek.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be installed along the top-of-bank of the Etobicoke Creek Valley corridor.
Conservation of land:
A portion of the exit road will be coincident with the top-of-bank of the stable valley wall;
the remainder of the route will be setback from the valley corridor. No fill material will be
placed below the top-of-bank as part of the 9radin9 work. In cooperation with Authority
nursery staff, the entire valley face has been planted with native trees to enhance slope
stability and promote wildlife habitat. Previously, the stable slope only contained
unmanicured grasses. Although it is staff's opinion that the roadway should not adversely
impact the stability of the valley wall, a geotechnical analysis has been requested to confirm
this matter.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28235 Application #:216/96/MISS
For information contact: George leja. ut. 342
Date: 1996.11.27
(7.6.14)Citv of Etobicoke Works Department
To place fill within a regulated area; alter a watercourse and construct in a flood
B675 EXeCUTNE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBeR 13, 1996
plain on Part Lots 14 and 15 , Concession B (FTH), (Between Royal York Road and
Edenbridge Drive), in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same et a!.
The purpose is to place fill and construct armourstone I rip-rap streambank erosion
protection within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Silver Creek.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1999 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Letter of Undertaking from Mr. T. Ellerbusch, P.Eng., Director, Engineering
Design and Construction, City of Etobicoke - Works Department; dated and
received on December 9, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposed works consist of removing sections of failed gabion baskets along this reach
of the Silver Creek and reinstating the stream bank with a combination of 3 to 5 tonne
armourstone and 400 to 600 millimetre diameter rip-rap. The entire site is located within
the Regional Storm flood plain; however only the downstream end of the proposed
streambank remediation work is Fill Regulated. Fill Lines are proposed to encompass the
remainder of the Silver Creek, in accordance with the on-going Fill Regulation Extension
Program.
Control of Flooding:
The hydraulics of the Regional Storm flood plain will be maintained through this reach of the
Silver Creek.
Pollution:
Drawings are presently being prepared and will detail all forms of sedimentation control
during construction.
Conservation of land:
In addition to streambank failures, some private properties adjacent to the Silver Creek
maintenance easement have suffered from erosion. The remediation work will also include
stabilizing the eroded valley slopes on private lands (written authorization will be received
from all landowners prior to construction). Authority technical staff will provide guidance
regarding the best construction method(s) to re-establish the channel banks and failed valley
slopes for this site. In -addition to implementing natural channel design techniques (to
mitigate extreme channel velocities and enhance aquatic habitat), all disturbed portions of
the riparian zone, as well as re-instated valley slopes, will be planted with native vegetation.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 3.3 - Policies and Procedures for Identifying
Watercourses and Alterations, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8676
CFN: 28303 Application #:232/96/ETOB
For information contact: George Leja, ext. 342
Date: 1996.11.28
(7 .6.15)Vince Ruscica
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 35, Concession 8, (South east corner of Hwy #47
and Hwy #48), in the Town of Whitchurch Stouffville, Rouge River Watershed as
located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to regrade in order to allow for continued maintenance of the existing vacant
property.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Redline Revised Regrading Locational Sketch; Drawing No.1; prepared by
Vince Ruscica, as received on October 23, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to conduct minor regrading in order to level the existing open field.
The works are within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain. There will be
no importation of fill material to the site. The existing lot is currently bordered by two
residences. The grading will allow for maintenance through periodic mowing of the site.
Control of Floodino:
There will be no measurable impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
The area once levelled will be resodded.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no impact on the conservation of land as the site will remain in its current use.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in accordance with Section 4.3 of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program.
CFN: 28231 I Application #:214/96/WS
For information contact: Russel White ext. 306
Date: 1996.11.28
8677 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/96, DECEMBER 13, 1996
(7 6 16)Chan, YP..P.. Nam
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 15, Registered Plan 5705, (7 Glenbourne
Park Drive), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to conduct regrading in order to facilitate construction of a new residence
and septic system.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to 1998.
(1 ) Site Plan Key Plan; Drawing No A 1, 7 Glenbourne Park Drive; prepared by
Sam Tom Architect; received on November 11, 1996.
(2) Sewage System Plan and Details; Drawing No's 51, 01; project No. 95643;
received on November 11, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnpm:al:
The applicant proposes to conduct regrading on the tableland portion of the site partially
within the Fill Regulated Area. The regrading will facilitate the demolition of an existing
residence and construction of a new residence on the site. Although the new residence is
beyond the fill regulated area, regrading is required in the fill regulated area to allow for the
mantle construction associated with the septic system. There will be minimal regrading
with no importation of fill material to the site. The works are not within the flood plain.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be erected between the top of bank and the proposed works and will
remain in place for the duration of the site construction.
Con~p..rvation of Lanrl:
There will be no impact on the conservation of land as all works are being conducted on an
existing lot of record in keeping with the development setbacks within this watercourse
reach.
Polir.y C::uirlp..linp..~:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2 - Development within established
communities of the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28289 Application #:224/96/MARK
For information contact: Russel White, ext.306
Date: 1996.11.15
EXeCUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBeR 13,1996 B678
C7.6.17)Town of Markham
To alter a watercourse on Part lot 30 and 31, Concession 9, (19th Ave. W. of
Highway #47), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to replace an existing culvert under 19th Ave. at Stouffville Creek which is
failing.
The permit will be issued from December 13, 1996 to December 12, 1998 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) 19th Ave. Bridge Site Plan, General Arrangement and Fish Habitat Mitigation;
prepared by Totten Sims Hubicki; project #4218485; Drawing No's P1, P2,
P3; received August 14, 1996.
(2) Correspondence from Totten Sims Hubicki Associates to MTRCA, regarding
Revisions to Fish Habitat Mitigation Plan P3; received December 11, 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
An existing 4 metre wide, 2.4 metre high, and 6 metre long culvert that conveys Stouffville
Creek under 19th Ave. is failing. The Town of Markham is proposing to replace the existing
culvert with a 5 metre span box culvert. The bottom of the culvert will be buried below the
invert of the stream and lined with river run stone.
Control of Flooding:
The road grade is to be elevated slightly (.076 metres). In order to compensate for this, the
span has been increased from 4 metres to 5 metres wide. As a result, the Regional Flood
elevation will not be increased.
Pollution:
Removal of the existing culvert will be undertaken in the dry. MTRCA and MNR staff will
meet on site prior to construction to discuss detailed sediment control.
Conservation of land:
Stouffville Creek is a cold water stream with on-site fish habitat. The Town has been
working with the Ministry of Natural Resources to design an appropriate mitigation strategy
for these works. The new culvert will provide for fish passage. In addition, the fish habitat
will be enhanced with native woody plants and root wads.
B679 EXECUTIVE COMM~E #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 26314 Application #:066/94/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, ext. 304
Date: 1996.11.20
NEW BUSINESS
RES. #B193/96 - MEMBERSHIP TO THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
OF GREATER TORONTO
The appointment of Navin Chanda ria as a member to The Conservation
Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard O'Brien
THAT the membership of Navin Chandaria to The Conservation Foundation of Greater
Toronto be approved for a three-year term September 24, 1996 to September 23, 1999.
MOTION I
RES. #8194/96
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard O'Brien
THAT The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto be requested to review the By~aws
that require Authority approval of the appointment of other than Authority members to The
Foundation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #10/96, held November 22, 1996, Res. #A236/96 was adopted
moving THAT the membership appointment of Navin Chandaria to The Conservation
Foundation of Greater T oro,nto be referred to the Executive Committee.
WORK EXPERIENCE
Since 1980 to present, Mr. Chandaria has been President & Chief Executive Officer of
Conros Corporation~ employing over 300 people. .The Company is based in Scarborough,
Ontario and has grown by over 1000% in the past decade and turned Conros into one of
North America's leading manufacturers of firelogs and consumer adhesives. Company
Headquarters are in Toronto with manufacturing and distribution facilities in Canada, USA
and Mexico.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996 8680
NON BUSINESS RELATED INVOLVEMENT
The past Board of Trustees of Toronto French School
Governor of the Stratford Shakespearean Festival
Member of the Board of Directors of the Smartrisk Foundation
. Member of the Roundtable Advisory Committee to the President of SHOPA - North
America's largest School & Office Supplies Association
Member of the Advisory Committee under Sagit to the Federal Minister of International
Trade
AWARDS
. Recipient of the Confederation Medal from the Governor General of Canada in 1992
Business Man of the Year Award in 1995 by his peers at the Indo-Canadian Chamber of
Commerce
PRODUCT
Conros Corporation manufactures Northland brand firelogs. Customers include Canadian
Tire, Home Depot, President's Choice, Price Club and Wal-Mart.
The primary ingredients of the firelogs are non-toxic recycled sawdust, molasses and
paraffin wax - no formaldehyde. Based on emission evaluations by Canmet, the combustion
testing laboratory of the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, their results
show that Northland Firelogs burn 5 times cleaner than wood and significantly reduces soot
and creasote deposits and carbon monoxide emissions into the air. The attached letter from
Mr. Joe Nunes, General Manager of the Conros Corporation, confirms this information.
Reported prepared by:
Waneeta Robertson, Ext. 276
B681 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11196, DECEMBER 13, 1996
.-:. CONROS CORPORAnON
Uta ~ 2aI&. ~ 0nIaria. e..ia .'"'11' %81
TII: "'111 7514]43 Fa: (4161 "1.5~
~'.:.: ..:"~" 05, 1996
.= ~. ~:.'. Oar he 1031JED196
Waaer= llabertsan
11= ~P'O""d~mt
! Shcrt=bImDrive
D~, Omario
}.ON 1S4
Dear Wm=a:
With M=:=e ta our tdephcnc ~ I ~ to ~ tbat tm: Nartblam!
Canbn FireleSS c!a DC~ hotve ~.,.l"'..byde as Zl ~
& you an: ~ our!ozmula is prcprictazy m! thmt"cro I 3m net able to give you
1be _pJ~ campasitian at - fimog. ~, all tha msr=c::ats are acn tc:cic
cd 1bc twg m:am ~ ze bardwoad sawdus: (wooc! wzsta fn:lm fbmin:e
pIams) and. '\llQX Cc::mdlc ~).
I hapc rhe above mfmm2ticn wiD. assist you at )IOCr ",~n..g, hcwewr, shaull! there
be my finttlI:r Deed. for additiazW icf'~::+-ioa. I will be d...Hgr,1'f!d to spcU to 1i1:rJ
iadiWbl - stW ;rfrMrinUlll in(m-n.,mcm sabjcct af c:aurse to ob~ a
enm;t!~!II~ aar=c:m= md 1he ==ssmy clear.mc:=s.
CE:NERAI. MANAGER.
JNIed
.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/96, DECEMBER 13, 1996 B682
RES #8195/96 - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT the Committee move into clossed session to discuss the staff report on the Lake
Ontario Waterfront Regeneration Project in the Region of Durham, 1996, Greenspace
Protection and Acquisition Project 1996-2000, Lake Ontario Waterfront Pickering, Ajax
Sector, Frenchman's Bay Area, James McKean Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
RES #8198/96 - ARISE FROM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THA T the Committee arise from closed session;
AND FURTHER THAT the action taken in closed session be ratified and adopted by
Res. #B196/96 and Amendment #B197/96. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11 :30 a.m., December 13, 1996.
Richard O'BriF!n .J Craig MathF!r
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/pl
~
"the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #12/96 Page 8683
January 10, 1997
The Executive Committee met in the Humber Room, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario
on January 10, 1997. The Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:05
a.m.
PRESENT
Lorna Bissell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Michael Di Biase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Brian Harrison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Lois Hancey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice Chair, Authority
Richard O'Brien ......................................... Chair, Authority
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Richard Whitehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
REGRETS
Lois Griffin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Joan King ................................................... Member
RES #B199/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #11/96, held December 13,1996, be approved. . CARRIED
8684 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
CORRESPONDENCE
(a) A letter, dated December 18, 1996, from Councillor Peter Li Preti regarding the sale
of Authority-owned land, located at Jane and Steeles Avenues and a proposal to
build a mausoleum, colombarium and crematorium on the lan~,
(b) A confidential letter, dated January 8,1997, from James McKean, 1210 Radom
Avenue, Pickering, Ontario, related to Res. #B204/96, page 695.
RES #B200/96 - CORRESPONDENCE
Moved by: Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT the above item of correspondence (a) from Councillor Peter Li Preti, be received.
AND FURTHER THAT the confidential letter, dated January 8, 1997, item (b), from
Mr. James McKean be received; and
THAT staff be directed to send a letter to Mr. James McKean informing him that the
Authority is not prepared to enter into any discussions regarding the purchase of additional
water lots owned by Mr. McKean or other family members, as part of the agreement
between the Town of Pickering, Mr. McKean and Price Waterhouse for the purchase of the
marina holdings;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to review the proposal for the purchase of additional
water lots, owned by Mr. McKean or family members, as a separate issue and report back to
the Executive Committee. ....................................... CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 B685
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES #B201/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
Flood Plain Component, Humber River Watershed
Highway 27 - Langstaff Holdings Inc. Property
CFN #28325. Purchase of property, located south of Rutherford Road,
west of Islington Avenue, in the City of Vaughan, under the
"Greenspace Protection And Acquisition Project 1996-2000, Flood Plain
and Conservation Component - Humber River Watershed".
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.15 acres, more or less, consisting of
an irregular shaped parcel of vacant land, be purchased from Highway 27- Langstaff
Holdings Inc., said land being Part Lot 12, Concession 8, City of Vaughan, Regional
Municipality of York, and further described as the whole of Block 26, Plan 65M-, consisting
of land fronting on the east side of Hwy # 27, north of Langstaff Road;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject
to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A 131/95, Authority Meeting #4/95, May 26, 1995, approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with Dave Mathews, Patrick Sweet and Associates
Limited, representative of the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
8686 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
RATIONALE
The subject property is within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition. It is part
of the valley lands associated with the Rainbow Creek tributary of the Humber River and is
linked to other Authority holdings. The adjacent Authority holdings were acquired from
Highway 27 - Langstaff Holdings Inc., in June 1992.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
Taxes on the property are $75.00 per year. After the parcel is linked to the Authority lands
in this area, it is estimated that the taxes will be $38.00 per year. It is proposed to turn over
the lands to the City of Vaughan under a management agreement when all the valley lands
in the area are consolidated under Authority ownership.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004-11-502.
For information contact:
Ron Dewell, Extension 245
, "
\
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8687 ~
""
---
.
,
!
I 0 Wo
! ' I .
! I I i . .
~ , . I I ~ ~
!' I I
! ! ! ! I
~~~::j~
\_W~
.,
.
::
~
.
! ~ ; ...
ii ...
I - OJ ..
I I ..
I 1
, *
I 1
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
l
i
-
. w ~
, \
\
8688 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96. JANUARY 10. 1997~
IOWN OF' VAUGHAN
%3.%1
-, .....
'....0 ,
-
--.. n
. i .a' '
I /
L ...-' .-
r ,
I .-, ,J .a,,'.
,..... ~
\ "\
- "
'- -
, ,-
-,
0 -
o'
.
..
-
......
..,..
'" .
,/ .
-
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8689
RES #B202/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT.
1996-2000
Flood Plain Component Highland Creek Watershed
Aragon (Pony Trail) Development (Ontario) Corporation
Purchase of property, located on the west side of Galloway Road, north
of Lawrence Avenue, City of Scarborough, Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto, under the "Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project
1996-2000, Flood Plain and Conservation Component - Highland Creek
Watershed" .
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.368 acres, more or less, consisting of
an irregular shaped parcel of vacant land, be purchased from Aragon (Pony Trail)
Development (Ontario) Corporation, said land being Part of Lot 13, Concession 1, City of
Scarborough, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and designated as Part 2 on a draft
Reference Plan prepared by R. Avis Surveying Inc. under their project No. 1277-1,
consisting of land situate on the west side on Galloway Road, north of Lawrence Avenue;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject
to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A 131/95, Authority Meeting #4/95, May 26, 1995, approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with a representative of the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition for the
Highland Creek, and is adjacent to Authority holdings.
8690 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The parcel being acquired will be turned over to the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
under the terms of the existing management agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account #004-11-502.
For information contact:
Mike Fenning, Extension 223
------..
~ I
I
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8691
..
,
, i
I
-0 i - I
: ; I i I
::' ,
, ! '0 I
~ I
i . I
.
8~~9~ I
0,
f
-~
-
/
0"
I
I
I
i
~
--
. !
,
8692 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
..
'.~
. ~ ""..
-
;
-'
,
I
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8693
SECTION II - FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ACTION
RES #B203/96 - ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP PARK PLAN
Consultant Contract Extension
To extend the contract of the Etobicoke Motel Strip Park Plan Consultant
Hough Woodland Naylor Dance Limited.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT the Etobicoke Motel Strip Park Plan consultant, Hough Woodland Naylor Dance
Limited's contract be extended for a total cost of $25,000, excluding GST.
AND FURTHER THAT The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the City of Etobicoke be
so advised. ................................................. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Meeting #12/94 held on February 10, 1995, the Executive Committee adopted the
following resolution:
Res. #E242/94
"THA T the consultant team led by Hough Stansbury Woodland Naylor Dance
Ltd. be retained to prepare a comprehensive plan of the Waterfront Public
Amenity Area within the Etobicoke Motel Strip Area at a total cost of
$84,765 (not including GST);
THA T the Authority express its thanks to the consulting teams led by du Toit
Allsopp Hiller, EDA Collaborative Inc., and the Kirkland Partnership for their
efforts in preparing and presenting their proposals;
AND FURTHER THA T the Shoreplan Engineering Limited existing contract be
extended at an upset cost of $10,000 to integrate the shoreline design
component into the park planning. 11
8694 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96. JANUARY 10, 1997
At Meeting #9/96, the Authority received a report on the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront
Public Amenity Study and Park Plan with the following resolution adopted:
Res.#A207/96
"THA T the staff report dated October 10, 1996 on the Etobicoke Motel Strip
Waterfront Public Amenity Study be received;
THA T the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Public Amenity Area Plan be
approved, subject to approval of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
and the City of Etobicoke;
THA T the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Public Amenity Area Plan be
submitted to the Minister of the Environment and Energy for approval in
accordance with Ontario Regulation No. 765/94 and Notice of Extension of
Exemption Order MTRCA-2 (December 12, 1995);
THA T the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Public Amenity Area Plan be
submitted to the City of Etobicoke for approval and incorporation into the
approved Secondary Plan (C-65-86) as set out in Policy Section 15. 11.3.
AND FURTHER THA T the Province of Ontario, The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto, the City of Etobicoke, the Waterfront Regeneration
Trust, and members of the Consultative Committee be so advised. f1
The Technical Advisory Committee (Metropolitan Toronto, Etobicoke. MTRCA) have met to
discuss implementation of the Park Plan and co-ordination of the Park construction,
FederallMunicipal Infrastructure and re-design of the Humber Bay Park East entrance.
The Committee has agreed to extend the contract of Hough Woodland Naylor Dance Limited
to provide additional conceptual and potentially detailed design in the following areas:
. Park LawnlHumber Bay East Park Gateway
(TTC Bus loop, waterfront trails, park entrance, Mimico Creek pedestrian bridge and
storm water management pond)
. Central Place.
. Review of planting plans, detailed design guidelines for lighting, bridge structures,
trail types.
The cost for this level of effort is estimated at $25,000, excluding GST.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8695
RATIONALE
The consultant will provide needed assistance to augment the expertise of the public agency
team implementing the infrastructure works, regional and local parks and Mimico Creek
pedestrian bridge. This effort will ensure the approved Park Plan and the specific
components are implemented in a cost-effective and co-ordinated manner.
The Technical Committee supports the additional effort by the existing Park Plan consultant,
Hough Woodland Naylor Dance Limited.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The consultant will begin working with the Implementation Partners Committee to develop
the detailed concepts and appropriate direction to facilitate the on-going park development
in 1997 and infrastructure works set to begin in early March 1997.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The expenditures for this contract extension is included within the "Revised Project for the
Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park (March 1995) and under Account No. 208-90.
Report prepared by:
Larry Field, ext. 238
RES #B204/96 - LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT IN
THE REGION OF DURHAM, 1996
GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996 - 2000
Lake Ontario Waterfront, Pickering, Ajax Sector
Frenchman's Bay Area - James McKean Property
CFN# 26529B. Receipt of a letter from the Ministry of Natural
Resources, dated December 20, 1996, stating the use of provincial
funds towards the proposed property purchase will not be provided.
Moved by: Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
THAT the staff report on the James McKean Property dated December 23, 1996, be
received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to confirm to the Town of Pickering that as a result
of the Provincial Government decision, the Authority cannot proceed with the purchase.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
continued.. .
8696 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
BACKGROUND
At the Authority Meeting held on December 20, 1996 the following resolution was adopted:
RESOLVED THAT Res. #A84/96 and #A85/96 be rescinded;
THA T 0.8 acres, more or less, be purchased from The Corporation of the Town of
Pickering, said land being two irregular shaped parcels of land being parts of water
lots 1 to 7 inclusive, Plan 65, Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham,
being partial takings of the total holdings, fronting on the west side of Front Street,
south of Commerce Street;
THAT consideration is to be the sum of $250,000, payable on or before January 31,
1997;
THA T the Authority receive conveyance of the land required, in its name alone, free
from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements. Title will also be subject
to the following:
(i) The Authority and the Town will each have an easement for public
recreational uses over each others lands;
(ii) The Authority and the Town will each have a right of first refusal over the
others lands.
(iii) The Authority will obtain an easement over the balance of the holding being
acquired by the Town of Pickering for access to the Authority lands.
(iv) Pickering will reserve a 30 foot easement for a boat launching ramp at a
mutually agreed location over the Authority lands.
THA T the Authority participation in this transaction be subject to approval of the
Province of Ontario;
THA T Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental
to closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THA T the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed
to execute all necessary documentation required.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8697
Provincial Decision
In accordance with the decision of the Minister of Natural Resources, as set out in the
appended copy of the letter of December 20, 1996, the Authority will not be proceeding
with the purchase of the McKean Property from the Town of Pickering.
Report prepared by:
Don Prince, extension 221
For information contact:
Craig Mather, extension 240 or
Don Prince, extension 221
6 I
,
8698 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
-'.. .... -.. ......... ..-- -- _. . -. . 0_- ':.... .... _ _.
i
~ I SlIlflca Wh~
lit MInistry of Ministitra des Oeourv MlniIur Sou...mnau. WIIitNy Blacx I
Richesses I au-n's Park au-t'1 Park
- t- Nanuaj Tarama. Omaria Taranm IOnwial
' . Flesaun:_ natureUes I I17A1W3 rtf7A1W3
- ...,.,... 4'lIlSt~S1 4'SI1~S1
ClIIiiia ~~4'er.n4-2'l.
.
Fir r .. . freo
' -: -U';'." t' :;a
. ;;; \.\:,;r !:- .:' l=a
n--ber 20, 1996 DEe 2 0 1996
--, Chll' Admln~~..lou ':i OffIce
i Mr. Dick O'Brien - - ..
I Cbzir
L _ Metro Toromo and Region Consc:rvmiau Authority
5 Shcr:ham Drive -
: DoWDsvic:w. Ontario
: M3N 256
! D=~
Furthe:to my letter of December 19.1916 ~t'_;"Igthepurcbase oftheJam=s Mc:..~
.-" Propcny and Price Wa=housc Pto..erty (fimncr McKcanKd Marina Company Site,
r :', Town ofPickerina>. I have fCYic:w= thc::i.ssuc and must CDne'nlf~ that the Ministry of
' .
'-, Nazural Resources is unable to approve the use of provinQal fimds towards the proposed
prcpeny pur:base. I
, I tnlSt that this decision will not impede e purchase of this property by the: Town of
Pick:ring.
. 4-
I
I
I
of
I
-
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8699
RES #B205/96 - LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONTI SURPLUS LAND DISPOSAL
PROCESS
RougelRosebank Community
CFN#26359
Status report on the disposal process for the Authority lands declared
surplus in the Rodd AvenuelBella Vista Dive area of the RougelRosebank
Community, in the Town of Pickering.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the staff report dated December 23, 1996, on surplus land disposal process in the
Rodd AvenuelBella Vista Drive area of the Rouge/Rosebank Community be received. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Members may recall that staff had a number of meetings with area residents and officials of
the Town of Pickering regarding amending the Authority's acquisition project boundary in
the Rodd AvenuelBella Vista Drive area. A plan was brought forward reflecting the
communities input on the revised acquisition boundaries and process for disposal of the
resulting surplus Authority lands. At Meeting #4/96, held on May 31, 1996, the Authority
adopted Resolution #A99/96 as follows:
THA T four blocks of land, including parcels currently owned by the Authority and others
within the blocks of land, be removed and deleted, from the acquisition project in the Rodd
A venue/Bella Vista Drive area of the Rouge/Rosebank Community in the Town of Pickering,
Regional Municipality of Durham, as shown on the attached Figure 2;
THA T various parcels of Authority-owned tablelands, being Parts of Lot 30, Range II,
Broken Front Concession and various lots on Registered Plan 233, containing a total of 1.85
acres, more or less, including five lots improved with single family homes and three vacant
parcels, shown in Figure 2, be declared surplus to the future requirements of the Authority;
THA T the sale of lands be on the basis that the lands are only to be used for single family
residential purposes, in keeping with the character of the community and in compliance with
existing R4 zoning;
That preference be given whenever possible to sales or exchanges being made at market
value to the following;
(a) Former owners
(b) Tenants
(c) Remaining private owners situate within the amended acquisition boundary
(d) Abutting property owners
8700 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
That staff be directed to negotiate with former owners, tenants, or area residents, who
have expressed interest in purchase or exchange until such time as acceptable offers are at
hand where upon any such offers are to be referred to the Executive Committee for further
consideration,
THA T in the event that staff are unable to arrive at suitable arrangements with former
owners, tenants, or residents in the area, that the subject properties be advertised for sale.
THA T The Town of Pickering, The Region of Durham, the Rouge Alliance, the Waterfront
Regeneration Trust and those attending the public meeting be so advised.
THA T staff be directed to communicate with Pickering on the possibility of closing the
westerly end of Bellevista.
Staff has met with the Authority solicitor and an independent appraiser engaged by the
Authority to assist in completion of the sales in this area. It is now felt appropriate to
proceed with the disposition of this land in accordance with the contents of Resolution
#A99/96. A map showing the location of the subject lands is appended.
Work to be done
In accordance with the provisions of Resolution #99196, it is proposed that the following
process be followed:
The priority of potential purchasers be:
1) Former owners
2) Tenants
3) Remaining Private Owners situate within the amended boundary which will include
abutting property owners
4) General public
and in all cases disposal will be at the appraised value or higher. For example, in the event
that a tenant and a former owner are both interested, the former owner will have first right
of refusal at the appraised value. The tenant would have the second right of refusal. The
remaining private owners within the amended boundary including abutting owners would
have a final right of refusal before the property is offered publicly. In the event more than
one private owner within the amended boundary is interested in the same property we will
generally accept the higher offer. In instances where there is an opportunity to meet other
program objectives, such as acquisition through land exchanges, consideration will be given
to the proposal that is in the best interest of the Authority.
The disposal process will proceed in the following phases:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8701
Phase 1: Letters will be forwarded to all former owners and tenants within the area
designated for disposal advising them of the action taken by the Authority.
The former owners and tenants will be requested to contact the Authority, in
writing within 30 days, in the event any of them are interested in purchasing
their former or tenanted property at current market value.
Upon receipt of advice that interest in a property is received, the independent
appraiser, engaged by the Authority, will complete a valuation of the
property. A copy of the valuation, along with a copy of a standard
Agreement of Purchase and Sale, in a manner acceptable to the Authority
solicitor will then be provided to the prospective purchaser. The owners will
be given up to 30 days to execute and comply with the Authority conditions.
Upon receipt of an executed agreement in an amount and form acceptable to
the Authority, the processing of the sale would proceed in accordance with
approved Authority and Provincial Land Sale Policies.
In the event no parties are interested in proceeding with purchases under this
component of the process, or in the event suitable agreements cannot be
arranged within the time limits set, staff will proceed with Phase 2 of the
process for all remaining properties.
Phase 2 Upon completion of the time frames set out in Phase 1, letters will be
forwarded to all remaining private owners, including abutting owners, situate
within the amended acquisition boundary, advising them as to the action
taken by the Authority. They will be requested to contact the Authority in
writing within 30 days in the event of any interest they may have in the
purchase of any of the remaining surplus lands in the area at market value.
Upon receipt of advice that interest in a property is received, the independent
appraiser engaged by the Authority will complete a valuation of the property.
A copy of the valuation along with a copy of a standard Agreement to
Purchase will then be provided to owners, with the owners being given 30
days to execute and comply with the Authority conditions.
Upon receipt of an executed agreement in an amount and form acceptable to
the Authority, the processing of the sale would proceed in accordance with
approved Authority and Provincial Land Sale Policies.
In the event meaningful negotiations are in progress, the 30 day period under
this component may be extended for a further 30 day period or until suitable
agreements are arranged, whichever date is earlier.
8702 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
Phase 3 In the event surplus parcels remain after the process as set out in Phase 1 and
2 has been carried out, those parcels will be advertised for sale to the general
public at market value in accordance with the existing Authority and
Provincial Land Sale Policies.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the proceeds of these sales be used to acquire high priority lands under
approved Authority land acquisition projects. In addition, it is proposed to utilize an amount
of up to $50,000.00 from the proceeds towards linking the Waterfront Trail through the
area and to carry out planting and regeneration in conjunction with the community on the
vacant lands being retained by the Authority.
Report prepared by:
Ron Dewell, Extension 245
For information contact:
Don Prince, Extension 221
----..
.
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8703
I
.
.-
~
:
,
i i
~
I
I
!
L.4K E
aNT ARia
,
,
CURRENT !~
~ !:
ACQUISITION i
PROJECT -
BOUNOARY r
S.ILI:
-
. . . . . !
I
;
i
:
:
I
I
:t~:;:_Z "0 !IE -----.
~::"C'/::= ='RCM · .
'C :'_:S:-~ON ;>RO,l(cn ... - - -.
.Iol".~Rlr'" ..,.,.as -
N' -... ...E:o<OEO
~a :.e: - i!CUI'Cl~S
,~ . '.:0' -., UlHOS ~7d I
-: ~~ :E ::..allEO
-' v / !_:r=_...s ~-_...:~
.\
)-----
-- :...:. ,. ""... ."O/IOE*~A/:t:JI _!.,~
----
--.--
8704 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
RES #B206/96 - ATTENDANCE AT AN ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD
HEARING - A3 COMMUNITY (187-89104)
TOWN OF AJAX
Staffs attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to be held
February 10, 1997 at the Town of Ajax in response to an appeal by
1097467 Ontario Ltd. in respect of a proposed amendment to the Town
of Ajax District Plan to introduce site specific land use designations and
site specific policies relating to lands located at the east side of Pickering
Beach Road, South of Bayly Street; a referral by 1097467 Ontario Ltd.
of a proposed plan of subdivision (18T -89104) located on lands
comprising Part Lot 6, Range 3, Broken Front Concession; and an appeal
by 1097467 Ontario Ltd. from Councils refusal or neglect to enact a
proposed Zoning by-law amendment to rezone the above-noted
subdivision.
"
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts be retained to represent the Authority at the hearing as
required;
AND FURTHER THAT staff continue to discuss revisions to the current development
applications with the Town of Ajax and the proponent in an attempt to resolve outstanding
issues prior to the Ontario Municipal Board hearing. ..................... CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 1978, Town Council approved the A3 Development Plan which provided guidelines for
future urban development through a generalized land use plan and a set of detailed
development poli=ies. The A3 Community of Ajax is a large community which includes
lands from Lake Ontario to Highway 401, and from Pickering Beach Road to the
AjaxlWhitby town line. Servicing constraints have prohibited development for a large
portion of the A3 area. However, with the imminent construction of services, there now
exists pressure for development in this community. Since the A3 Development Plan was
approved, planning and environmental policies and practices have been developed and/or
been modified. In order to respond to such changes and provide more current direction for
development the Town of Ajax has undertaken planning studies and policy reviews for this
area. A review of an area known as the A3 Corridor has been prepared, resulting in an
official plan amendment which was considered by Council in July of this year. The A3
corridor Land Use Study included a section on the natural environment which included
recommendations which formed the basis for appropriate official plan policies. In response
to the A3 Corridor land Use Study and its proposed official plan amendment, and
in recognition of the pressures for development in this area, Council adopted the following
resolution at its meeting of July 15, 1996:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8705
"That the A3 Corridor Land Use Study, the A3 Development Plan and
the District Plan be amended to require a comprehensive environmental
study to be completed for the Carruthers Valley and related
environmentally sensitive features, such study to be carried out under
the direction of the Town of Ajax in consultation with the MTRCA and
to be initially paid for by the Town of Ajax on the basis of full cost
recovery from the affected landowners as a condition of draft plan
approval or other planning consents;
And further, that all portions of the A3 Corridor Study, A3
Development Plan amendment and District plan Amendment that are
conditional on submission of an EIS be deferred pending completion
and adoption of the comprehensive environmental study".
The firm of Gartner Lee has recently been hired by the Town to prepare the
comprehensive environmental study.
MTRCA PROGRAM ISSUES
In commenting on the draft A3 Corridor Land Use Study and Community Plan, staff
recommended to the Town, in a letter dated July 23, 1996, that development not proceed
until a more comprehensive Environmental Servicing Study had been carried out. Council
supported this approach as noted in the above Council Resolution.
With regards to the suggested Proposal Call to prepare a comprehensive environmental
study staff provided the following comments to the Town, by letter dated December 5,
1996, on the purpose and outcome of this study in order to clarify our study objectives.
1. A coordinated approach by affected land owners to the identification and protection
of the natural resources including the methodology for determining environmental
buffers and edge management needs. Given that some of the lands associated with
these natural resources had previously been designated for urban uses, a coordinated
approach can facilitate a review of various options for achieving their protection and
management.
For example:
. The northern limit of the Warbler Swamp affects several landowners and
the planning for these lands as related to the swamp protection and
management should be carried out jointly. The methodology approved
through the Runnymede development to the south of the Warbler
Swamp may provide guidance for this work.
. The Environmentally Significant Area affects several land owners and
the planning for these lands as related to the ESA protection and
management should be carried out jointly.
8706 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
. The valleylands of the Carruthers Creek affect several land owners and
the planning for these lands as related to valleyland protection and
management should be carried out jointly. This should include a review
of land use objectives for the parcels of land located immediately north
and south of Bayly Street within the valleylands but above the Regional
Storm flood elevation.
2. A coordinated approach by landowners within the A3 Community for servicing
requirements related to storm water management in order to minimize the number of
facilities and ensure that the location of facilities have the least environmental
impact. The Town's study could identify those lands and landowners that should
work together to design and implement a servicing strategy. For example, the lands
west of Carruther's Creek could likely be reviewed under a separate servicing study
than the land east of the Carruthers Creek and there may be rationale for additional,
smaller servicing study areas.
Draft plan of subdivision 18T -89104 has been referred to the Ontario Municipal Board by
the proponent. Since the 1970's, there have been a number of new elements to be
considered, such as the designation of the Environmentally Significant Area (ESA), Ajax
Warbler Swamp Wetland, the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
and the Runnymede Somerset Cove Comprehensive Environmental study. There is a better
understanding of the importance of the natural resources and measures for their protection
and management. As this plan has been referred in absence of the comprehensive
environmental study, staff are continuing to work with the proponent and the town to
ensure the natural features and storm water management are looked at in a coordinated
fashion by all affected land owners.
For information contact:
Barry Knox, Ext. 268
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8707
RES #B207/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the
Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be
constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a
Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or
on such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river,
creek, stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT permit 7.5.1. The City of Etobicoke, be granted in accordance with Ontario
Regulation 158 for the application which is listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
(7 5 1 )Thp. City nf Etnhir.nkp.
To alter a watercourse on Part Water Lot, Concession B.F.C., (Waterfront Drive), in
the City of Etobicoke, Lake Ontario Watershed as located on property owned by
MTRCA.
The purpose is to construct a 900 x 1800mm concrete box culvert storm sewer outfall in
order to facilitate the development of the Motel Strip property.
The permit will be issued from January 10,1997 to January 9,1999 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) City of Etobicoke Works Department, project no. PDB-1902, sheet 1, dated received
by MTRCA December 17, 1996; Drawings 2-7, dated received by MTRCA October
31, 1996. (Total Drawings 7)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnrn~al:
To construct a concrete box culvert storm sewer outfall to the Motel Strip embayment,
which will serve as the Etobicoke Flow Balancing System. The embayment is to be created
as part of the MTRCA Motel Strip project.
8708 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
Cnntrnl nf Flnnrling'
The outfall is part of the overall storm water management plan for the Motel Strip project.
The outfall will direct post development flows to the embayment at the west end of
Waterfront Drive. The Flow balancing system is to be constructed in the embayment and
will consist of a five cell water quality treatment facility.
Pnllutinn'
Sedimentation will be controlled within the embayment, which will be blocked from the lake
during construction. The outfall to the lake will be completed subsequently as part of the
Authority project. A sediment control plan indicating the locations of sediment controls on
the site has also been prepared and will be implemented as part of the city's construction
controls.
Pnlir.y r,uirlp.linp.~'
The works are in compliance with the approved Revised Project for the Etobicoke Motel
Strip Waterfront Park (March 1993) and the Etobicoke Motel Strip Public Amenity Plan
(Approved Authority Meeting 9/96, October 25, 1996). The lands for the storm water
facility are in the ownership of MTRCA (under management agreement with Metropolitan
Toronto) and the Province of Ontario. The City of Etobicoke has agreed to construct the
facility under the Federal/Municipal Infrastructure Program and maintain the facility. The
City of Etobicoke has submitted a request for an easement for the facility. While agreement
exists between the partners for an easement, this matter cannot be brought forward for
approval until all the land for the storm water facility has been consolidated in the
Authority's ownership.
CFN: 28271 Application #:220/96/ETOB
For information contact: Richard Lloyd, Ext. 281 / Larry Field, Ext. 243
Date: 1996.12.18
RES #B208/96 - ZANINI DEVELOPMENTS LTD.
Moved by: Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT permit 7.5.2. Zanini Developments Ltd, be granted in accordance with Ontario
Regulation 158 for the application which is listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
(7 ~ ?) Zanini Dp.vp.lnpmp.nt~ L trl
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 266, 75 & 76, 267-271 (inclusive);
Registered Plan M-137, (7 Brussels Street), in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material for grading, in connection with the construction of a
new townhouse development, within the Fill Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8709
The permit will be issued from January 10, 1997 to January 9, 2002 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Grading and Servicing Plan, prepared by Sidra & Associates Ltd., Drawing No.
96-ET64-1, Revision 1, dated December 19, 1996; received December 23, 1996.
(T otal Plans 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prnrn~al:
The proposal consists of placing fill for lot grading purposes, in connection with a new
townhouse development. Only the extreme eastern portion of the site is located within the
Fill Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
The entire development is located outside the Regional Storm flood plain of the Mimico
Creek.
Pnlllltinn'
Sedimentation control fencing will be installed and maintained between the lands to be
developed and the Mimico Creek valley corridor.
Cnn~p.rvatinn nf L ann'
As part of the review of the associated rezoning application, Authority staff required the
proponent to undertake a geotechnical report to address overall slope stability and the long
term stable slope for this property. Property lines were set back in accordance with the
recommendations from the report, which range anywhere between 3 to 10 metres from the
physical crest of valley slope; this area will be appropriately zoned to restrict development
and will form part of the valleyland dedication associated with the rezoning application.
From the long term stable slope, proposed structures will be set back between 4.5 to 11
metres from the long term stable slope. Combined, the minimum distance from the physical
crest of slope to a proposed structure is 12 metres, as opposed to the existing one storey
concrete building currently situated on the property which is located 1 metre from the
physical crest of slope. The proponent's consultant is presently revising the engineering
drawings, eliminating (or minimizing) fill placement in the rear yards of the proposed lots
abutting the valley corridor, as recommended in the approved geotechnical report.
Pnlir.y Gllinp.linp.~'
The proposal complies with Section 4.1.1 - New Urban Development; of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28323 Application #:235/96/ETOB
For information contact: George Leja, Ext. 342
Date: 1996.12.19
8710 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
RES #B209/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THA T a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application
7.5.5 Glen Major Angling Club, that had been scheduled on the agenda as an errata item for
which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below. All other
errata items were withdrawn by staff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
(7 5 3)ARC Srnrt~ I trf
To place fill within a regulated area and construct in a flood plain on Part Block liB",
Registered Plan 760, (3111 Universal Drive), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke
Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
Withdrawn by staff.
(7 5 4) RAginnal Mllni~irality nf Ynrk
To alter a watercourse on Part lot 1, Concession 2, (Bayview Ave. N of Steeles
Ave.), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
Withdrawn by staff.
(7 5 5) GIAn Majnr Angling Clllh
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 3, Concession 8, (RR#5, Claremont), in the Town
of Uxbridge, Duffin Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to alter the existing on line pond by modifying the outlet structure and
rebuilding the existing spillway.
The permit will be issued from January 10, 1997 to January 9, 1999 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Letter of Undertaking for the Glen Major Pond #1 Rehabilitation, prepared by
Alan Wells of the Glen Major Angling Club as received January 9, 1997.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 B711
Prnpn~al:
The applicant proposes to alter an existing on-line pond by modifying the outlet structure
and rebuilding the existing spillway. The existing cement spillway and outlet structure are
in disrepair. The applicant proposes to install a bottom draw outlet which will have the
effect of providing cold water to the downstream ponds and watercourse, and will allow for
easier maintenance of the pond in the future.
The Ministry of Natural Resources is concerned about the current condition of the dam
structure, and the capacity of the proposed spillway to pass a large enough storm event
before the dam is overtopped. Overtopping may result in the failure of the earthen section
of the dam. In this regard, they have requested detailed hydraulic and hydrologic
calculations and further recommended that the design be stamped by an engineer.
Authority staff have also have concerns with the detailed design of the outlet pipe (bottom
draw) and have requested additional information and design modifications which include:
. providing an anti seepage collar on the pipe;
. providing a foundation for the stand pipe;
. providing an anchor for the pipe;
. providing washer seals at the pipe joints;
. indicating the degree of compaction for the disturbed part of the berm; and,
. indicating the construction staging and sediment control techniques.
This permit recommendation will proceed only when staff are satisfied with the design.
Construction of the works began prior to the issuance of a permit from either the Ministry
of Natural Resources or MTRCA; the work was halted following discussions with Ministry
and Authority staff.
Cnntrnl nf Flnnning'
There will be no impact on flood levels downstream as a result of the proposed changes to
the pond outlet and spillway. However, as a result of MNR requirements, any design
modification to the dam, other than the spillway and outlet pipe, may result in the need to
reconsider possible impacts on the control of flooding.
Pnlhltinn'
The applicant is proposing to isolate the area of proposed works by temporarily redirecting
flows around the work location. Staff have requested further details on the construction
by-pass and other sediment control measures during construction.
Cnn~p.rvatinn nf I ann.
Currently there are a series of three ponds which are stocked with fish and used by the
fishing club. The ponds represent a barrier to the passage of indigenous species of fish from
the downstream to the upstream side of the ponds. The use of the facility and other
physical constraints on the site preclude the opportunity to provide for the movement of
fish at this time.
8712 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
The construction timing should conform to the Ministry of Natural Resources Construction
Timing Guidelines for cold water habitat or to specific direction of the Ministry's fisheries
biologist.
Pnlir.y Gllirlp.linp.~'
The works are in compliance with Section 5.4 (B)(2), Aquatic Regeneration of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28081 Application #: 139/96/UXB
For information contact: Russel White, Ext. 306
Date: 1996.12.24
(7 ~ fi) Corky rip. Graallw
To construct in a flood plain, (1883 Kingston Road), in the Town of Pickering, Duffin
Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
Withdrawn by staff.
RES #B210/96 - OFFICE SUPPLIES AND PAPER TENDERS
This report advises on the results of the office supply and paper
quotations received by the Authority as part of Tender Opening Sub-
Committee Report #01/97 and #02/97, opened prior to Executive
Meeting # 11196.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the report dated December 13, 1996, on office supply quotation be received and that
the quotation from Basics Office Products be accepted, it being the lowest price received;
AND FURTHER THAT the report dated December 13, 1996, on paper quotations be received
and that the quotation from Graphics Paper be accepted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND - OFFICE SUPPLIES
Annually, the Authority purchases various office supplies valued at about $25,000. For
comparative purposes, suppliers are requested to price out a shopping basket with 22 items
in it. Prices are for 1 of each item and all 22 items are totalled.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8713
ANALYSIS
Five companies were contacted and the following four submitted bids for supply of office
products to the Authority:
Corporate Express Ltd.
Today's Business Products
Basics Office Products
Grand & Toy
The tender specified a shopping basket of the 22 most often purchased items. Staff have
evaluated these items and recommend that the bid from Basics Office Products be received,
it being the lowest quote received.
BACKGROUND - PAPER SUPPLIES
The authority annually purchases between $30,000 and $40,000 worth of paper supplies.
The value of the contract is over$25,000 and pursuant to the Purchasing Policy, must be
approved by the Executive Committee.
ANALYSIS
The following companies submitted bids for supply of paper to the Authority:
Buntin Reid
Coast Papers
Graphic Papers
Unisource Ltd.
The Authority uses a wide variety of paper sizes and stock. For purposes of evaluating the
values on the tender, the pricing for 8 % X 11 was identified, it being the largest volume
purchased.
Graphic Paper and Buntin Reid supplied identical pricing for this item. Staff evaluated both
bids and chose Graphic Papers as they were able to supply their specialty papers at greater
savings.
Staff will continue to monitor opportunities to participate with member municipalities in the
purchase of paper products.
Report prepared by: John Annunziello, ext. 272
. !
I
8714 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
--
1997 PAPER PRICING
Paper/company Graphic Unisource Buntin Coast
Reid
I1:f~~~~~f.jfr1~;1:Ml%l_10_~;ft~1ra1!1hi;~~llli~1J~1'11)~}11~~:Jt?:~~:~;~;;;~
8 1/2 X 11 6.10 6.65 6.10 6.20
8 1/2 X 14 7.77 8.50 7.78 7.90
11X17 12.20 13.30 1 2.20 12.40
;f;i:;:;}1{i:~~::j:~::;~j!:::i~::j.imlt;f.Jl!~1~!i~;:\;~:;;r.~i~;;,;~~t:i}.~~~~~nl1,l~i;tl:1j.~%:~;~ft~ft.tii;;:(1~~;i:::~;::li\::f;~::}:::r~:::i:j,K~::::
8 1/2 X 11 5.75 5.75
8 1/2 X 14 7.35 6.25
11X17 11.50 11.50
;~:-;~:::/;i]:~;::;:~~;:;tfj.fJ.~::~(;;lt!{tlrll~i~0~~)~~:~~tt~'1~}fti11?if;~f.1~~:~1~{~;~1;~:::;;:;;~t;~:;:::;.:::.;r::;;~:~::!r;jt;):
8 1/2 X 11 9.75 9.45 10.25
8 1/2 X 14 12.43 12.00 13.07
11X17 19.50 18.90 20.50
;::~~~~:~ai\t;;l::J:iIi'~fl{\:1::;:i(il;_c;;~j:::~i~:~~:::~:t.::;-:~~~~1i~fg:;i~i~}~;!~J~~~~:~:;~t;:~:2i::;4.;;;1;ii}~n;
i
I Royal Fibre or 20.50
:
Crushed Leaf
Sandpiper 19.65 18.64
Passport Scriot 19.50 20.07
Nekoosa Ooaaue 24.00 20.83
Conceot 24.22 24.23
Circa Select
Fusion Exact 12.20 12.38
12.87
------..
. f
I
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8715
--
1997 OFFICE SUPPLIES - SHORT LIST
-~
Uauid Paper .55 1.18 .84 .58
AA 8atteries .56 1.10 1.09 1.11
Standard Staples .55 .64 .47 .66
8 aram Glue Stick .40 .53 .47 ,42
38 aram Glue Stick 1.50 1.63 1.68 1.16
Accodata Binders - larae 2.50 3.98 2.38 3.92
Letter size File Folders 4.99 6.72 6.99 6.99
Leaal size File Folders 5.99 8.57 8.99 8.97
Elastics .63 .58 .43 .68
Telephone Messaae Pads .18 .19 .20 .20
3 X 3 Post it Notes .36 .41 .48 .39
Letter size Lined Pads .79 .72 .93 .83
Leaal size Uned Pads 1.25 1.38 1.20 1.30
Letter size Quad Pads .79 .73 .70 .83
Leaal size Quad Pads 1.25 1.38 1.25 1.30
1" Binders 1.59 1.61 1.91 1.58
Bic Round Stik Pens .08 .12 .10 .12
Hiahliahters .22 .37 .27 .40
Pencils, HB, 2H .08 .16 .13 .14
Scotch Tape .95 2.60 .99 2.56
Reaular size Pacer Clics .14 .16 .13 .15
Jumbo size Paper Clips .37 .43 .41 .42
j!tgtAl';~\:;tii\~!7:I!:~~:;;g:tK~I{f.;}4.%~;~:t?:::. ::--~~3~';';::b1!:r! }3s:i 9::::1;:~ij\~jj~~(~- ::"3i~~A~J.t~t1: .. .. .
':":. ":..,::::'..;:, :':':":::~~:;'::;~;':::?
::,'.34~6a-.:;::::?:::t-::
8716 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
RES #B211/96 - WRITE-OFF OF OUTSTANDING INVOICE
Ontario Native Alliance. Write-off of an uncollectible outstanding invoice
in the amount of $5,891, owed by the Ontario Native Alliance.
(F&A Advisory Board Res. #F26/96, #F27/96)
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THAT the outstanding
invoice dated August 17, 1995, in the amount of $5,891, owed by the Ontario Native
Alliance be written off as uncollectible;
THAT Authority staff advise The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto that this amount is
being written off as uncollectible;
AND FURTHER THAT staff provide The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto with a list of
the names of individuals involved with the Ontario Native Alliance. . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
NEW BUSINESS
RES #B212/96 - FORMER MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES LANDS, MAPLE
Decision to proceed with negotiations for acquisition of all or part of the
lands.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT subject to the
approval by the Regional Municipality of York and the City of Vaughan, staff be directed to
develop a project for the acquisition of the former Ministry of Natural Resources Lands at
Maple including an appropriate cost sharing formula;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to negotiate with the Ontario Realty Corporation
(ORC) to secure a purchase agreement.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 B717
AMENDMENT
RES #B213/96
Moved by: Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT paragraph two of the main motion be deleted and replaced with the following:
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to negotiate with the Ontario Realty Corporation
(ORC) to secure an acquisition agreement.
THE AMENDMENT WAS ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority previously dealt with this matter at Authority Meeting #8/96 held September
27, 1996, adopted by Res.#A 180/96 and Authority Meeting #9/96, held October 25, 1996
adopted by Res.#A208/96:
Rp.s #A 1 RO/~n
"WHEREAS the Ministry of Natural Resources operations previously carried out at the
Maple District Office are being moved to other locations and these lands declared
surplus to their needs and turned over to the Ontario Realty Corporation for disposal;
and
WHEREAS these lands are a critical natural resource within the Don River Watershed
system and the Greater Toronto Area; and
WHEREAS the property is located on the Oak Ridges Moraine and forms part of the
headwaters of the East Don River, a major headwater tributary running through the
property having a cold water fishery associated with this watercourse; and
WHEREAS the property is well vegetated and the stream valley is steeply sloped and
may be suitable for designation as an Environmentally Significant Area and an Area
of Natural and Scientific Interest; and
WHEREAS the Authority has endorsed Forty Steps to a New Don which sets out the
strategy for the protection, regeneration and enhancement of this important
watershed including retention of green spaces and the protection of natural heritage
features as critical components of the strategy; and
WHEREAS the Ministry's lands can play an important role in ensuring the future
health of the Don River; and
8718 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
THEREFORE BE IT RESOL VED THA T the Authority urge the Province of Ontario to
ensure that these important headwater lands remain in provincial ownership so they
can continue to contribute to the overall protection and regeneration of the Don;
THA T the Authority, the Don Watershed Regeneration Council, the City of Vaughan
and the Region of York work with the province to develop a plan for the long term
future of the property and a strategy to protect the natural features and functions
important to the health and regeneration of the Don River Watershed;
AND FURTHER THA T the local MPs and MPPs, the Region of York, and the City of
Vaughan, be so advised. ·
Rp.~ #A?OR/~6
"THA T Regional Councillor Michael Di Biase, be appointed as the Authority's member
to the Ministry of Natural Resources Lands Task Force established by the City of
Vaughan;
THA T Craig Mather, Chief Administrative Officer, The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority be Mr. Di Biase's alternate;
THA T the Authority receive and endorse the recommendations of Meeting # 1/96 of
the Ministry of Natural Resources Lands Task Force;
THA T the Chief Administrative Officer be directed to advise the Ontario Realty
Corporation of the Authority's support of the recommendation of the Ministry of
Natural Resources Lands Task Force which requests an extension of time to March
31, 1997 to determine which lands should be retained in public ownership as
important environmental and open space resources within the Don River watershed.
AND FURTHER THA T staff report to the Authority on any future plans related to the
disposition of the Maple Ministry of Natural Resources lands. ·
At its meeting of January 7, 1997, the Ministry of Natural Resources Land Task Force
adopted the following resolution:
Whereas the Ministry of Natural Resources operations previously carried out at the
Maple District Office are being moved to other locations durin;;. 1997; and
Whereas the Province of Ontario has declared its intention to dispose of the former
Maple District Office lands; and
Whereas these lands are critical headwaters of the Don Watershed as they are
located on the Oak Ridges Moraine and provide important corridor, regional
greenspace, linkage and buffer functions;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997 8719
The Ministry of Natural Resources Lands Task Force, therefore recommends to the
City of Vaughan, the Regional Municipality of York and The Metropolitan Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority:
That the MNR lands should be retained in public ownership for future greenspace,
public and quasi public uses, and natural resource protection purposes; and
That the City of Vaughan and the Region of York request the MTRCA to adopt a
Project to acquire the property based on a cost sharing between the municipalities
and other sources; and
That the acquisition of all or part of these lands be carried out by a negotiating team,
led by the MTRCA and supported by appropriate environmental studies; and
That negotiations with ORC commence immediately upon receipt of approval of
these recommendations by the City of Vaughan and the Regional Municipality of
York; and
That the purchase price be subject to the approval of the City of Vaughan, the
Regional Municipality of York and the MTRCA; and
That an implementation committee of local citizens, politicians, agency
representatives and others be struck to develop a long term strategy for the use of
these lands; and
That the implementation committee consider the development of a broad range of
uses compatible with the purpose for the acquisition of the site and that provide
opportunities to work with private as well as public agencies; and
That the ORC be requested to share in funding the development of a flow
management strategy to be carried out by the MTRCA in cooperation with other
appropriate parties, in order to identify and address the impacts of any
discontinuation of the pumping of groundwater at the site; and
That all agencies recognize the importance of the East Don Corridor located south
and east of the MNR lands including the tableland linkages; and that all agencies
work together to acquire these lands over time, primarily through dedication,
easements or arms length negotiation. "
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Authority staff will lead negotiations with the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) in an
attempt to prepare a suitable purchase agreement for all or part of the property.
A project will be developed for the acquisition of the site, setting out a cost sharing formula
to include the Region of York, City of Vaughan, private funding and other sources for
further consideration by the Authority and the funding partners.
8720 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/96, JANUARY 10, 1997
The Ontario Realty Corporation has given the Task Force until February 17, 1997 to
complete negotiations before ORC will offer the property for sale to private interests.
Report prepared by:
Brian Denney, ext. 242
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11: 15 a.m., January 10, 1997.
Rir-hard O'BriAn .I r.raig MathAr
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
Ipl
~ - --:- .
, the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #13/96 Page 8721
February 14, 1997
The Executive Committee met in the South Theatre, in the Visitors Centre at Black Creek
Pioneer Village, 1000 Murray Ross Parkway on February 14, 1997. The Chair, Richard
O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10: 1 0 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Authority Member
Michael Di Biase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Lois Griffin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Brian Harrison ................................................ Member
Lois Hancey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice Chair, Authority
Richard O'Brien ......................................... Chair, Authority
Enrico Pistritto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Member
Richard Whitehead ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
REGRETS
Joan King ................................................... Member
RES. #B214/96 - MINUTES
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #12/96, held January 10, 1997, be approved. ... CARRIED
B722 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
DELEGATIONS
The following delegates, (a) to (h), spoke in opposition regarding the issue of the sale of
Authority-owned land, located at Jane and Steeles Avenues in the City of Vaughan, and a
proposal to build a columbarium and crematorium on the lands. Delegation (i) Mr. Tenio
Evangelista confirmed that air quality is a concern to the Federal Minister of the
Environment. See also, Correspondence page B723.
(a) Councillor Peter Li Preti, City of North York;
(b) Mr. Ishawar Bisram, Vice President, York Condominium 206,
North York.
(c) Ms. Patricia Shaw, Chair & President of Hullmar South Homeowners
Association, North York;
(d) Ms. Franca Guadagnolo, President, Finch North Homeowners Association,
North York;
(e) Mr. Guido DeRose, President, Hullmar North Homeowners Association;
(f) Mr. Attilio Didiano, 207 Firgrove Crescent, North York;
MOTION
RES. #B215/96
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT the delegation request~ .. . -- g) Ms. Ida Deganc President, South-Finch Homeowner.
Association, (h) Mr. Mario Ser~,. . c ,P.P., Yorkview, ana (i) Mr. Tenio Evangelista, Senior
Constituency Assitant, Office of the Minister of the Environment, be granted. . .. CARRIED
(g) Ms. Ida Degano, President, South-Finch Homeowners Association, North York;
(h) Mr. Mario Sergio, M.P.P. Yorkview;
(i) Mr. Tenio Evangeliste, Senior Constituency Assistant, Office of the Minister of
the Environment, recognized that the issues of air quality are of concern to
the Federal Ministry of the Environment. Mr. Evangeliste will bring this
concern to the attention of the Minister of the Environment.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/96, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B723
RES. #B216/96 - DELEGATIONS
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT the above-noted delegations (a) to (i) be received. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
CORRESPONDENCE
(a) A letter, dated January 10, 1997, from Antoon van der Vooren, Ph.D., P.Eng, of
Simons Environmental addressed to the Mayor and Members of Council of the City of
Vaughan, regarding the air quality approvals for the proposed columbaria and
crematorium at Jane and Steeles. This letter is in reference to the issue addressed
by the above-noted delegations and was provided for information.
(b) A letter, dated February 13, 1997, from Allan Stone, Architect of SKMV Architects
add,ressed to the City of North York, Planning Department regarding the design
aspects of the proposed columba ria and crematorium at Jane and Steeles. This letter
is in reference to the issue addressed by the above-noted delegations and was
provided for information.
(c) A letter, dated February 14, 199, from N. Jane Pepino, a.c. of Aird and Berlis
Barristers and Solicitors, as legal counsel for 1177284 Ontario Limited, the purchaser
of lands at the northeast corner of Jane Street and Steeles Avenue. The letter is
addressed to the Chair and Members of the Authority and provides further
background information on the issue addressed by the above-noted delegations and
was provided for information.
RES. #B217/96 - CORRESPONDENCE
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT the above items of correspondence (a) to (c), be received. . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
B724 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
- -
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #8218/96 - MEMBERSHIP - THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF
GREATER TORONTO
Renewal of Members - Kenneth A. Smee
The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto appoints members for a
three year term.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the membership
renewal of Kenneth A. Smee be approved for a three year term, December 20, 1996 to
December 19, 1999. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At The Conservation Foundation's Board of Directors meeting #1/97, held on Wednesday,
January 22, 1997, "UPON MOTION duly made by S. A. Marsden and seconded by W. R.
Livingston, IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED THAT Kenneth A. Smee's membership with
The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto be renewed for a further three year term,
December 20, 1996 to December 19, 1999, subject to the necessary approval of The
Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
Approval is now being requested to comply with the guidelines set out in The Conservation
Foundation's Charter and By-Laws.
For information contact:
Waneeta Robertson, Ext. 276
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B725
RES. #B219/96 - MEMBERSHIP - THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF
GREATER TORONTO
Appointment of Members - Gordon J. Joyce
The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto appoints members for a
three year term.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by:; Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the membership
of Gordon J. Joyce be approved for a three year term, January 22, 1997 to January 21,
2000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At The Conservation Foundation's Board of Directors meeting #1/97, held on Wednesday,
January 22, 1997, "UPON MOTION duly made by D. O'Brien and seconded by W. B.
Misener, IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED THAT Gordon J. Joyce be appointed a
member of The Conservation Foundation for a three year term, January 22, 1997 to
January 21, 2000, subject to the necessary approval of The Conservation Authority."
Approval is now being requested to comply with the guidelines set out in The Conservation
Foundation's Charter and By-Laws.
Gordon J. Joyce is the President of INFECTROL Inc., which represents a network of
facilities, technology, staff, vehicles, software, system and security designed to provide the
most environmentally effective and economical biomedical waste control services to large
and small communities throughout Canada.
Mr. Joyce is a senior executive with board, general management, marketing and
administrative experience and a proven performer in both large and small companies in the
records and information management industries. He has successfully introduced new
technologies and created companies making use of his capability to sell ideas, develop
business plans, build effective teams and staff commitment.
Prior Experience
co-founded Collins, Joyce & Co. Ltd., a professional records management firm of
consultants to business and all levels of government;
created Command Records Services Limited, the first company in Canada to offer inactive
records indexing, storage, retrieval and disposal;
participated as President of Command and a senior executive with Moore Business Forms
and Systems;
expanded Command nationwide;
participated as a Senior Management Committee member of Moore Corporation and an
executive of Moore Business Forms and Systems;
participated as a senior executive with Moore Business Systems, a global division from
1994 to the sale of the Command business unit in October, 1985.
B726 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE#13J96, FEBRUARY 14,1997
-.
Qualifications
. Bachelor of Arts, Economics 1967, McMaster University;
Founding charter Member, Toronto Chapter, American Records Management Association,
and instrumental in creating a new 100 million plus Records Management Industry.
Associations & Clubs
. Association of Records Managers and Administrators (ARMA)
. Association of Image and Information Management (AIIM)
. Metropolitan Toronto Board of Trade
. Scarborough Golf and Country Club
. Maganassippi Fish and Game Club
Duck Island Club
For information contact:
Waneeta Robertson, Ext. 276
RES. #B220/96- BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE
Membership Development Grant
A resolution from the Authority approved Black Creek Pioneer Village's
(BCPV) application to the Ministry of Citizenship, Culture, and
Recreation for a grant of $14,100 for membership development.
Moved by: Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Lous Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT approval be given to Black Creek
Pioneer Village to apply to the Ministry of Citizenship, Culture, and Recreation for a grant
under the Strategic Cultural Development Fund;
AND FURTHER THAT approval of matching funds of up to $10,100 for this project be
provided from Black Creek's donations previously generated and membership revenues
generated through this membership development project. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Ministry of Citizenship, Culture, and Recreation announced a small Cultural Strategic
Development Fund in late 1996 to assist a limited number of projects. The purpose of the
fund is to increase the self-reliance of cultural organizations and improve their access to
non-government sources of financing.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B727
In recent months, BCPV has established a membership development strategy to increase
membership revenue from $25,000 to $200,000 by 1999. Elements of this strategy were
submitted as a project proposal to the Ministry and on January 23, 1997 the Ministry's
review committee passed the project through the first stage of review and requested Black
Creek submit a formal application. Black Creek's application is now proceeding to final
review, which should be complete by mid-February. A board resolution is required to
complete the application.
Black Creek's grant proposal is to undertake in the spring, a new member acquisition
campaign. This project includes production of membership brochures, computerized records
for 5,000 recent non-member visitors for mailing and call lead sheets, a direct mail and
telemarketing campaign in MarchlApril. Direct membership revenue target for this initiative
is $30,000. Incremental spending by new members through the 1997 season will certainly
occur, and a member retention goal of at least 75% is projected.
Included in this project are some 1 time start-up costs and therefore this project will have a
long term effect of reducing overhead for all subsequent new member campaigns. For
example, a similar Fall campaign with 5,000 new leads captured over the May-October
period can be run at a projected cost of $12,000. with a projected return of $30,000.
This project networks BCPV to the Conservation Foundation software as an additional
licensee, ensuring that BCPV donor and member records are integrated with the Foundation
and supplying BCPV with membership software, which it currently lacks.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Total project costs are $28,200 including the donation of a computer from a corporate
partner (estimated value $4,000. which is part of Black Creek's matching portion). Black
Creek will contribute $10,100 from donations on hand and revenues generated from the
campaign. The Ministry of Culture is being requested to contribute 50% of total project
costs which is $14,100.
Budget Summary
Computer hardware $ 4,000
Raiser's Edge Software 2,000
Software training 1,000
Data Entry Phase 3,100
Direct Mail Phase 12,600
Telemarketing Phase 5.500
Total $28,200
Ministry of Culture contribution $14,100
BCPV contribution 10,100
Computer 4.000
Total $28,200
B728 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/96, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
Black Creek's matching funds for this project may not come out of its base budget in order
not to jeopardize BCPV's provincial museum grant. Previous donations from members of
$5,100. has been raised and the remaining $5,000 will be generated from the projected
member sales.
DEl AILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
This project will commence immediately upon approval of Ministry funding and be
completed by mid-May.
For information contact:
Marty Brent, ext 403
RES. #B221/96 - STATUTORY BORROWING RESOLUTION
The Authority's Rules of Conduct require approval annually of a
resolution to provide for borrowing of funds, if necessary.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS lHA T the Authority may borrow from the
Royal Bank of Canada, or the Authority's member municipalities or other institutions as may
be specifically approved by the Authority, up to the sum of TEN MILLION DOLLARS
($10,000,000) on the promissory note or notes of the Authority until peyment to the
Authority of any grants and of sums to be paid to the Authority by participating
municipalities designated as such under the Conservation Authorities Act R.S.O. 1990,
Chapter 27, at such rate of interest as the Minister of Natural Resources approves;
THAT the amount borrowed pursuant to this resolution, together with interest, be a charge
upon the whole of the monies received or to be received by the Authority by way of grants,
etc., and when such monies are received, and of sums received or to be received by the
Authority from the participating municipalities, as and when such monies are received;
AND FURTHER THAT the signing officers of the Authority are hereby authorized to take
such action as may be necessary to give effect thereto. .................. CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B729
BACKGROUND
The Authority's Rules of Conduct, Section XVIII, Banking and Borrowing, require that the
borrowing of money by the Authority shall be authorized by a resolution of the Authority.
At each annual meeting, a resolution is presented to authorize borrowing for the coming
year.
The Authority's borrowing resolution provides that the Authority may borrow up to
$10 million. This amount is necessary in the event that certain land acquisitions proceed
prior to the actual receipt of funding from the Authority's funding partners. On a day-to-day
basis, the Authority borrows infrequently and usually in amounts less than $100,000 for
periods of one or two days only.
The Authority entered into a banking agreement with the Royal Bank of Canada which was
effective September, 1995.
The terms and conditions of the five year agreement provided that the Royal Bank was
entitled to increase its fees to the Authority after the third year of the agreement. There
has been no increase in fees by the Royal Bank since the agreement was entered into.
For information, the Authority had approved the appointment of auditors annually. In 1995,
as a result of a public tendering process, KPMG was appointed as the Authority's auditor for
a term of five years subject to satisfactory performance.
Report prepared by:
Jim Dillane, ext. 220
DUFFINwROUGE AGRICUL TURAL PRESERVE
TOWN OF PICKERING, REGION OF DURHAM
The results of discussions with the Ontario Realty Corporation, the Town of Pickering and
the Region of Durham with respect to the initiative of the provincial government to sever
and sell into private ownership part of the provincially owned land acquired for the former
North Pickering project.
Withdrawn by staff.
8730 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/96, FE8RUARY 14, 1997
GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1996-2000
Flood Plain Component, Petticoat Creek and Duffin Creek Watershed Ontario
Realty Corporation (ORC)
Withdrawn by staff.
RES. #B222/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
Lake Ontario Waterfront, Pickering Sector, Hertha Jaworsky Property
CFN 28398. Purchase of property municipally known as 515 Bella
Vista Drive, located in the Rosebank area, in the Town of Pickering.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.11 acres, more or less, consisting
of a lot, improved with a three bedroom brick bungalow, be purchased from Hertha
Jaworsky, said land being Part of Lot 28, Registered Plan 233, in the Town of Pickering,
The Regional Municipality of Durham, fronting on Bella Vista Drive in the Rosebank area
adjacent to the Rouge Park;
THAT the purchase price be $195,000, together with payment of vendor's reasonable legal
costs;
THA T the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance,
subject to existing service easements;
THA T completion of the transaction be subject to The Rouge Park Alliance funding 50% of
the purchase price;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B731
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A131/95, adopted at Authority Meeting #4/95, held on May 26, 1995,
approved the project.
At Meeting #2/96, dated March 29, 1996 the Authority under Resolution #A35/96, directed
staff to request the Rouge Park Alliance to assist in the funding of the acquisition of the
properties between Bella Vista Drive and the Rouge River.
At Meeting #4/96, May 15, 1996, the Rouge Park Alliance adopted Resolution #65/96 as
amended, as follows:
MTHA T the Rouge Park Alliance endorse the proposed boundary amendment and the
potential disposal of surplus Authority land in the Rodd A venue/Bella Vista Drive area of
the Rouge/Rosebank Community as shown on the attached Figure 2;
AND FURTHER THA T the Rouge Park Alliance will consider assisting the Authority in the
acquisition of the three properties between Bella Vista Drive upon such time as a
satisfactory sale price is negotiated and acceptable offers are at hand, in recognition of
the strategic importance and value of the lands to the Rouge Park.
Further to this staff have requested the Rouge Park Alliance assist the Authority in the
purchase of 515 Bella Vista Drive, Town of Pickering, on a cost sharing basis of 50/50. The
Rouge Park Alliance will be dealing with the request at their meeting scheduled for February
17,1997.
Negotiations have been conducted with Robert Owen, Sutton Group-Classic Reality Inc.,
representative of the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
At Meeting #4/96, May 31,1996, the Authority adopted Resolution #A99/96, approving a
revised acquisition boundary and the disposal of certain lands in the vicinity of Rodd
AvenuelBella Vista Drive, in the Town of Pickering. The lands associated with 515 Bella
Vista Drive remained in the acquisition project.
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition along
the Lake Ontario shoreline and the Rouge River valley, and is adjacent to Authority holdings.
It represents one of the few remaining residential properties along this reach and the
acquisition of this lot helps consolidate the Authority holdings into a more meaningful and
useful form that can be enjoyed by the public.
B732 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
~ .
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
Taxes on the property are $1882.00 per year. After the structures are demolished and the
parcel is linked to the Authority lands in this area, it is estimated that the taxes will be
$600.00 to $700.00 per year. Authority forces maintain the lands in this vicinity. The
addition of another lot will not have any significant impact on maintenance costs.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The Rouge Park Alliance has been requested to fund 50% of the purchase price. The
Authority's share will be raised through land sales. Funding for this acquisition will be
charged to Account #004-12-502.
Report prepared by:
Ron Dewell, ext. 245
For Information Contact:
Don Prince, ext. 221 and Ron Dewell, ext. 245
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13198, FEBRUARY 14,1997 8733
-:
I
I
C"! ~l ICe-
I I'~ \.-' I \ ~ i:
Ii
- 1\
~. I
I!
I'
II
1
I
\:
L-J.K=
I ON~AP!C
i
I R:::;. :-'L:" '_:NE
i
--
CURRE>li ~
ACCUISiil0N
I'ROJEC7
BOUNCAR':' "
sc..u: i
-
=--
. . . . .
,
,
I
!
!
~IilC::'3 '0 3E -----.
~~"O"c '"'lCN · .
>e::"ISI7.CN 2I!O.:EC~ .. - - -..
",,--CR1-V ;,.,oNCS ~
.,-.", -"'E!-lCC
~OC.::- aCUl'lOotRlES
." - -CR17" '-""Os ~.~~ ~~JI
-: ~~ :E::'.>RO --- -- -~
!__.2Q'_..S
)-----
--
----- :.s.:- ~"f:/"'C-"IIf ~"'Cc""~~ *' !"SS'5
B734 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
--~
---
!
.
! i w
! ! , i . .
~ I I J ;:
. , J
~ ! j I ! I
i I
c:m~~
"II'..' ,..
;1 _ u.: ~
i l
..
0
..
..
".
~
0
;
-
...
~
...
..
^' -
- -
" -
--"
I
I
I
,
I I
i
, ~
-
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/96, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B735
RES. #B223/96- GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed
John Scott Martin, CFN 27509. Purchase of 8 partial taking from a
property located on the west side of Greenwood Road, south of
Hamlet of Greenwood, Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of
Durham.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 26 acres, more or less, consisting of ....
irregular shaped parcel of vacant land, be purchased from John Scott Martin, said land being
Part of Lots 12 and 13, Concession 5, Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham;
THAT the purchase price be $25,000 together with payment of vendor's reasonable legal
costs ....d an amount not to exceed $6,000.00 to prepare a geotechnical report and obtain
an amendment to the Minister's zoning order for this location;
THAT the purchase is conditional on the Authority providing at its expense, to the Vendor
satisfactory proof that the retained lands can be used as a single femily residential lot which
includes a geotechnical report and an amendment to the Minister's zoning order;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject
to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A 131/95, Authority Meeting #4195, May 26, 1995 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
B736 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
John Martin originally approached the Authority advising that he would be willing to convey
the valley lands to the Authority at a reduced value, on the basis that the retained 2.5 acre
would be a residential lot. The appraised value of the lands to be acquired by the Authority,
is based on the assumption that the land being retained by John Martin is a single family
residential lot.
The Minister's zoning order presently allows for the construction of a single family dwelling
on a lot with minimum frontage of 600 feet and a minimum area of 25 acres. The existing
lot presently complys with these requirements. The amendment to the zoning order is
required as a result of the Authority's acquisition of the valley.
Authority technical staff has carried out an extensive review of the land being retained and
has indicated that a geotechnical report will be required which demonstrates that any
proposed dwelling and septic system will not impact the overall stability of the slope.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition for the
Duffins Creek.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The 1996 realty taxes on the entire property were approximately $2,550. However it is anticipated that
this parcel will be combined for tax purposes, with adjacent Authority holdings resulting in a realty tax
payment of $1,500 per year. Authority staff maintain the lands in this area and the addition of this
property will not have any significant impact on maintenance costs.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The costs associated with obtaining the necessary approvals to provide proof that the
retained land is a single family residential lot will be approximately $5,000 to $6,000.
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004-11-502. The funding to be
from Land Sale Revenue.
Report prepared by:
Michael Fenning, ext. 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13198, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B737
-:
map
,
I
! j w
i .
<7- , I u
u -
~ I I I
j . I
~ ~~mJ~
~
0
,
G-
o-
~
~
=
-
~
.:
8, .
..... .. -
-' .
. ;
-.... ..
- .
--
. -
- . ,
I
.
, ~
B738 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/96, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
--~
map
"I-~-:' .
I -:
- - -
I
i -
I
I
I
!
~
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B739
~-
RES. #8224/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT
1996-2000
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Mimico Creek Watershed
Zanini Developments Limited, CFN 28400.
Purchase of property located in the vicinity of 7 Brussels Street, North
of the Queen Elizabeth Way, City of Etobicoke, under the "Greenspace
Protection and Acquisition Project 1996-2000" Flood Plain and
Conservation Component, Mimico Creek Watershed.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.285 acres, more or less, be
purchased from Zanini Developments Inc., said land consisting of an irregular shaped parcel
of land being Part of Lots 266 to 271, Registered Plan M-171, City of Etobicoke,
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and designated as Parts 1 and 3 on a Draft Plan of
Survey prepared by David Horwood Limited under their Project No. 3680;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject
to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land
transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A 131/95, Authority Meeting #4195, May 21, 1995 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with representatives of the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed this proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
A plan illustrating the specific location is attached.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
B740 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
-.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
This parcel of land will be turned over to the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto under the
terms of the existing management agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004-11-502 - Flood Control Hazard Account.
Report prepared by: Michael Fenning, ext. 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITIEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14.1997 -; 6741
map
\ ,
I
I
I I
'" - i . \
f . .
~ ' ,
,-
i-jilf::7'i11 I I
L_iiJ~:.1i
o.
:
~
.., I
'0'._--"',..
,- -
- .r
.-- -~ .- .
~\. - ~......:.:,.." ~\
A::" :
V-~ :/ ~.
. ~
,-
: -' -" \
.., I .- -'"
','. l - I'
-...,.r ~.I
~: ~ '
I -- ....' t
~ - -
,
I
I I
I
I
..--.-...
. /"'J'C '\.,
~
~"
~
.. I I
B742 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3J96, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
map
;-
~
""
...,
,
" ,
"
.,
"
~ ,
,.....
'-"I
:
"...
,
SUBJECT PROPERTY
--9
...
9--. -~
------'"
~~ AUTHORITY
_.' LANDS
,
,
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/96, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B743
RES. #B225/96 - GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT
1996-2000
Flood Plain and Conservation Component
Humber River Watershed. Poplar Oaks Land Development Corporation
CFN 26757. Purchase of property located in the vicinity of Upwoods
Avenue and west of Black Creek Drive, City of North York, under the
"Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1996-2000" Flood
Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed.
Moved by: Richard Whitehea
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.394 acres, more or less, be
purchased from Poplar Oaks Land Development Corporation, said land consisting of an
irregular shaped parcel of land being Part of Block A, Registered Plan 2525, City of North
York, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and designated as Block 13 on a Draft Plan of
Subdivision prepared by Templeton-Lepek Limited under their file no. 655;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject
to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred Incidental to closing for land
transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #4/95, Resolution #A 131/95, May 21, 1995 approved the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner and their solicitor Enzo Di Iorio of Bianchi
Presta, Barristers and Solicitors.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed this proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
A plan illustrating the specific location is attached.
B744 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
-_.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
This parcel of land will be turned over to The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto under the
terms of the existing management agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004-11-502 - Flood Control Hazard Account.
Report prepared by:
Michael Fenning, ext. 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/96, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 _' B7..5
.
map
\ ~
~n\ - , ~.' r
",
-::, ' _ ..;-" /- -i 1
~\', -~ ':'--'1--
\t\\~ :> --
0- -----
0
\ oq
\i\ :i
~\! ~ ~)
ol.J ~~ \
I"
., , 0
,n
- --
. ~ ,
I 1\
.) :
-- r' '\ :)
'- ~ ; ~
- .- ~ - I t'
\ -
"\ ." - "-- .
'\ - '-. \
,- -'
.' , ,
"
" - ,
"
;\ ~
'- "
i
\ :
~
~ 0
. ~ AUTHORITY
' " ---
00 LANDS
-
-
- - ":::; I
,- SUBJECT PROPERTY
_.,.0
- -
.
.
0_ t\
~ -..
- - - . ~~ -
~ -
c ~
~\ -
'-- ~ 0
,._j~ .;-
LAWR-ENCE;V~. - -
: "'-_1- v '
: -- v .
: --
: -'
-
')
~ :
. ..!~ -
J .'~ ..,
-- ~ .
B746 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1J13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
-..-.
map
i
. ,
. I i : ; ,
; , i 0 I
;; , i
! - ! I
!
i --1'7'11 . I
I _~.iJ..;.1
I ,
I ,
I
i ! ~ i
I
; I
, I
I
'-
, .!,I
- - .- .f_ i
---
. I
,
- : ,
. - --
....-
.-.. - -
.,
:: ~ "
':-. )
'\. I
- - - i
--'~"..'..
,
, I
i
I -
,
I
I
I
I
I
i
i I
I
,
i
i
.
,
,
I
I -
! ...,.
---:~
:....
- ,
I
i I
i
-
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/96, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B747
RES. #B226/96 - SALE OF LANDNICINITY OF 49 THORN CLIFFE PARK DRIVE
Borough of East York, Goldlist Development Corporation
CFN 26608. In receipt of a request from The Metropolitan Toronto
Encroachment Review Committee, staff explore the possibility of a sale
of small fragments of tableland in the Don River Watershed.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority, is in receipt of a request from The Metropolitan Toronto
Encroachment Review Committee, to proceed with a sale of small fragments of Authority-
owned tableland, situate adjacent to 49 Thomcliffe Park Drive, Borough of East York in The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND WHEREAS It is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to complete a sale to Goldlist Development Corporation;
THAT a small fragment of Authority-owned tableland containing 0.0015 acres, more or less,
be sold to Goldlist Development Corporation, said land being Block V A, Registered Plan M-
736, Borough of East York, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
THAT the Authority request the approval of The Minister of Natural Resources to complete
the sale of the subject land on the following terms and conditions:
(a) The sale price is to be the sum of $5,000;
(b) Goldlist Development Corporation is to pay the costs for legal, appraisal and
survey and must obtain the approval of the Land Division Committee of the
Borough of East York;
(c) Completion of this sale will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be
required for the severance. Any additional planning approvals which the purchaser
may desire, or the municipality requires, will be at the expense of the purchaser;
(d) The transaction is to be completed at the earliest possible date with payment in
full, being made to the Authority on closing.
THAT the sale be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance
with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as
amended;
AND FURTHER THAT appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
B748 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
BACKGROUND
The Metropolitan Toronto Encroachment Review Committee and Metro Parks and Culture
are recommending the sale of these small fragments of tableland.
The potential disposal of these fragments of land was brought to the attention of the
members of the Authority on July 22, 1994, and under Resolution #A 156/94, staff were
directed to report back to the Executive Committee recommending further action at a later
date.
The subject sale consists of fragments of tableland being part of a much larger area acquired
from Thorncliffe Park Ltd., in December 1961, under Water Control Project #15, Don River
Watershed.
The Authority's technical staff and the Borough of East York have reviewed this location
and have no objection to the proposed sale.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the proceeds from this sale be used to acquire high priority lands required
under approved Authority land acquisition projects.
Report prepared by:
Tom Campitelli, ext. 335
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 8749
-.
map
----. ..-- --_. ----
,
I
!
I
I
- -
, , ,
- , .
Ii _ = 1
. ,
- .
- .
, :. - --n-I'
-; ! ,. :!! : .:
_, :lj._ '1
I :
I I
, I
I
:~ .r_ I
!
- - I
I r /~f l
- - - :: -~ ---\... --.~ !
. :s _ -" _T-: ....'-: :\.,..~:' I
I 1 ;-" ~I ". - - -,- . . I
I ~ :.; r')\ ~\ I
\ 1 .r-:. - ' "..- . . I
I ~ : \
\ . :: - - :--;. - I
. - }-- 1""- - - . --' .
I -;.' ",\."'- -"-:--:-:....,,. '.-::-'
-'. . - - ".' I
.~ -..
I - -- I
I ,..--
I I
i i
. I
, I
I :
i
I
I
!
i
i
--,
.,.
~...-:::~
--
-----
I :
I I
I
--- -- ---- --- - -----
B750 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ~ 3196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
---.
map
I J
RE: SALE OF LAND/VICINITY OF ~9 THORNCUFFE PARK DRIVE
I Borougn of E3st YorK
- -
! GOldlist Deveiocment C.:Jrcoratlon
CFN Z6608
I
\ I
- .
-Vi
i -
--
i
I ...
.-,
/
/
/
/
/,
-,
'1~ ;
I
'-..;
':-> -
-. 'l' I
--
; --
I .I
,
;:''19 I (
U-
w-
I
\
-- ..... ct6\
/
...:.---
/j' / /
. / /~ ....
. .... ,. ,
~ "
. ,/ "> ',' r
.:: /.,.~ ~ .. ',. / /,.
) /?i'"' ,.....// // /
-, / .
. <~ /: ./ij
,/ .., ,
, .. ...., . /' ,.
'>" .,. , """ .:
/ ..:////~
./ /' . ,,,,,/,," ----
./ -' /",~ :
EXECUTIVE COM'v1ITTEE"'3I96, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B751
_.
RES. #B227/96 - THE MUNICIPAUTY OF METROPOUTAN TORONTO VALLEY
AND SHORELINE REGENERA nON PROJECT, 1992-1996
GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT,
1996-2000
Lake Ontario Waterfront, Scarborough Sector
The Estate of Bertha M. Yates, CFN 12182
Purchase of property municipally known as 71 Chesterton Shores,
located in the City of Scarborough, Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard O'Brien
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.52 ecr.., more or less, consisting of
a rectMgular Maped parcel of land, improved with a wood frame bungalow and a storage
shed, be purchased from The Estate of Berthe M. Yat.., said land being Pert of Lot 35,
Range 1, Broken Front Concession, Formerly in the Township of Pickering, now in the City
of Scarborough, Municipelity of Metropolitan Toronto end designated as Part 9 on Plan 4OR-
1462;
THAT the purchase price be $220,000 together with payment of vendor's reasonable legal
costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject
to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers end Solicitor., be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for
land transfer tax, legal costs end disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority official. be authorized end directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
AMENDMENT
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Richard O'Brien
THAT funding for this acquisition be charged to Account #004-11-502 - Land Sale
Revenue.
THE AMENDMENT WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. NOT CARRIED
THE MAIN MOnON WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
B752 EXECUTIVE CottMTTEE ~ 3196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
BACKGROUND
Resolution IA98/91, Authority Meeting 13/91, May 3, 1991, and Resolution IA131/95,
Authority Meeting 14/95, May 26, 1995 approving the projects.
Negotiations have been conducted with Roger Holmes, representative of the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition along
the Lake Ontario shoreline. This property is adjacent to existing Authority holdings and is
the last remaining residential dwelling at the west end of Chesterton Shores.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
This parcel of land will be turned over to The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto under the
terms of the existing management agreement.
FINANCIAl. DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 1004-2-502. The purchase will be
funded from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration
Project, land sale revenue andlor a contribution from the City of Scarborough or some
combination of these sources.
Report prepared by:
Michael Fenning, ext. 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/96, FEBRUARY 14,1997 8753
-,
map
,
w I
"
0 i
j . u
'" .
u ..
~ I I
j !
n-!D~~
" 1& .. ''',
~_1J~1
::
0-
.
~
-:-
:;
:\~""",( \ ~,/~
.:,-! " .'" ,"
.. .r' ./
::.
-=. ,
---
r "" '
:
...
...
-'~ ...
..
"'.' I
-.'1' -
~
'.-~J
'~
B754 EXEC~ COMMITTEE "'3198, FEBRUARY 14,1997
map
, a~
W
~ '. ~
,iC
~ W "~.~.
~ '-~~ <-
---- \AI - ,
-. a: \ .~
3" ~
-- ~i-" ~
~.. 0(1)
- - , '" :Q
~;~:-.r~ I- Z
'-.., - , ::l <
~~ < -.I
V_.;.--;:.('-1 I
_=---.:" 'f~ ,: ~
-~-:'~
~.-.
>
I-
a:
W '
a.
o
a:
a.
I-
o
W
.,
ED
~
en
I '
: '
EXECUTIVE COMWTTEE iJ13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B755
RES. #B228/96 - DON VALLEY BRICK WORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Quarry Boardwalk, Don Valley Brick Works
Award of contract to construct boardwalks across the quarry wetland
complex at the Don Valley Brick Works Site, in the Borough of East
York.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT The Tender Sub-convnittee Report for
boardw" Md ...... reiling. work, dated February 3, 1997, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT Hobd.. Conatruction Company Ltd. be awarded the contract to
construct boardwalks across the quarry wetland complex at the Don Valley Brick Works
Site, for the amount of $155,899 (exduding G.S.T.I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The constructed wetland in the quarry is a key feature of the Don Valley Brick Works
Regeneration Project. To be effective, the wetland was designed to incorporate features
which would perform important ecological and social benefits. These include:
. filtration, sedimentation and uptake of pollutants;
. provision of a breeding and nursery area for wildlife, migratory fauna, fish and
native fauna;
. to provide opportunities for wildlife viewing and enjoyment of nature.
The construction of boardwalks, complete with railings, will provide the public with a unique
opportunity to access, view and enjoy the natural wetland features of the site. The
boardwalks will run diagonally across the southern most pond, connecting the patio behind
the building complex with the interpretive pavilion in the centre of the quarry, and along the
base of the Georgian Bay Shale outcrop which runs along the northwestern edge of the
pond complex.
In this regard, contractors experienced in the construction of boardwalks were prequalified
by the project landscape architect and staff. Based on this prequalification, the following
contractors were asked to submit bids:
Aldershot Landscape Contractors Limited
All Railings
Hobden Construction Company Ltd.
Somerville Construction
.
B756 EXECUTIVE Cot.9JIlTTEE '-'3196, FEBRUARY 1..1997
-.
The results of the Tender Opening of February 3, 1997 are:
Contractor Bids
AIdershot l.Mdscape Contractors Umited $257,547
All Railings $104,750 (Incomplete)
Hobden Construction Company Ud. $155,899
Somerville Construction $214,056
RATIONALE
Staff reviewed in detail the bids from the two firms with the lowest quotations and
determined that All Railings had declined to quote on key elements of the work such as the
installation of the concrete caissons, and therefore their bid was deemed to be incomplete
and invalid. The second low bid was submitted by Hobden Construction. Staff determined
that their bid was complete, and in follow-up discussions with the contractor concluded that
they fully understood the scope of the work. Therefore, staff recommend the award of this
contract to Hobden Construction in the amount of $155,899, to complete the work
associated with the installation of boardwalks within the quarry.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This work will proceed upon confirmation of funding from the Conservation Foundation of
Greater Toronto.
Report prepared by:
Nick Saccone, Ext.301
For information contact:
Nick Saccone, Ext.301 or Adele Freeman Ext.238
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/96, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B757
RES. #B229/96 - REQUEST TO AMEND A PERMANENT EASEMENT
Brampton Hydro-Electric Commission and The Corporation of
the City of Brampton, CFN 26535. Receipt of a request from the
Brampton Hydro-Electric Commission and The Corporation of the City
of Brampton to amend a permanent easement to allow for the
construction of an underground hydro line on the west side of
Goreway Drive, north of Highway 17, City of Brampton.
Moved by: Lois Griffin
Sevonded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT RuoIution #A331/95 adopted by the
members of the Authority at meeting .13/95 held on February 23. 1996 be amended to
allow for the construction of en underground hydro line in the permanent easement
containing 0.07 hectares (0.17 ecres) said lends being Part of Lot 8. Concession 7, Northern
Division, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel:
AND FURTHER THAT the consideration to amend the use of the permanent easement be
$1,000.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A331/95 is as follows:
'THA T WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in
receipt of a request from the Srampton Hydro-Electric Commission and The Corporation
of the City of Srampton to provide a permanent easement for an overhead hydro pole line
located on the west side of Goreway Drive, north of Highway 17;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interest of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Srampton Hydro-Electric Commission and The
Corporation of the City of Srampton in this instance;
THA T a permanent easement containing 0.07 hectares, more or less, (0.17 acres) be
granted to the Srampton Hydro-Electric Commission and The Corporation of the City of
Srampton for an overhead hydro pole line, ssid land being Part of the north half of Lot 8,
Concession 7, Norther Division, City of Srampton, Regional Municipality of Peel;
THA T consideration is to be the concellation of Srampton Hydro-Electric Commission's
invoice to the Authority in the amount of $4,127.09, together with $5,000 for
restoration works to be undertaken by the Authority, plus all legal, survey and othe costs;
THA T ssid easement is subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with
Section 21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
B758 EXEC~ C0t&4ITTEE 113/96, FEBRUARY 14,1997
THA T the appropriate Authority officials authorized and directed to take whatever action
may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and
the execution of any documents;
AND FURTHER THA T the Brampton Hydro-Electric Commission be responsible for
PByment of all realty taxes on the permanent easement lands. ·
The Brampton Hvdro-Electric Commission have advised that in recent years, the electrical
demands of Chrysler Canada have increased dramatically. The Brampton Hydro-Electric
Commission proposes to construct a dedicated feeder line from Ontario Hydro's Goreway
Transformer Station through an easement on Authority land to the Chrysler Canada Plant.
Since the existing easement width of six metre will not accommodate an additional
overhead line, The Brampton Hydro-Electric Commission is proposing to install an
underground feeder line. To minimize surface disrupton The Brampton Hydro-Electric
Commission intends using the directional boring method.
The Authority's technical staff has reviewed this proposal and has no objections to the
proposed construction subject to receiving conformation from The Brampton Hydro-Electric
Commission that no machinery will enter the valley corridor and reviewing the detailed
design of the proposed construction technique.
Plans illustrating the specific location are attached.
Report prepared by:
Michael Fenning, ext. 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B759
~
'\
\.,
-
/' /~
~ / \ I
.g I \ ..
,/ ,,~
".po. ' /
.p/
,
I
_.-"
'~o
.g ~
...
A
. ".PO
;t
:)
~-_... - - \, / :. ---
~I,',~"...,' ,"'~'"I_:''' .~
~~\;~J,'I-: ~~_,:,I.'-"';; AUTHORITY LA~OS
,~~~ ,-'~Jt'I~!.~'~~7.;-" I
SUBJECT LA;\/OS
.- __ ___ _ .,r I
B760 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
map
r
I ['
I I
. I
I .'
~ j W t
I ~. ; : .. ,.
~ . !
. !
r 1--: m -:1 f11 .
, ~. ~: li1::1111 I
'.
~
. <
tt
~
I .. \ ----
- -.::., -L!:..~... \
- _ )., :-4' \
&,::::'"" _ . - I l\""~:l
I · : ~ .... I -.~ -;; l! I, vi'"
t _ _ ". t-~ . ,; ,.!l . - ~ .
.~ ;...
~
I
I ',/ -.. 0
!
i
I
i
i
I
I
. .
j /~
I ' 'Ji:::-,\
~
, -)C-> ,
,'--
I I
i _ _____ I
EXECUTIVE Cot.NITTEE .-t3l96, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B761
_.
RES. #8230/96 - UCENCE AGREEMENT WITH THE MUNIClPAUTY OF
METROPOLITAN TORONTO
Duffins Creek Watershed, CFN 28423
Entering into a licence agreement for a five year term with The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto to facilitate the construction of a
stream gauge located on the Metro Brock North Landfill site, Town of
Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Authority ....ter into . licence
agreement with The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for construction .,d use of a
stream gauge, by the Authority on a parcel of ..,d owned by Metro containing 0.005 acres,
more or...., said lend being Part of Lot 14, Concession 5, Town of Pickering, Regional
Municipality of Durham;
THAT the WIn of the licence agreement be five years with. further five year option to
renew 8ACI the right to terminate upon six months notice;
THAT the payment be a nominal consideration of $2.00;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
As a component of the Authority's agreement to provide baseline environmental data in
relation to the Seaton Lands, the Authority has constructed three stream gauges on
tributaries of the Duffins Creek which drain through the Seaton lands. One gauge is
located off Rossland Road on the Urfe Creek on Authority-owned lands. A second gauge is
located on the Region of Durham's Brock Road right-of-way at the Ganatsekiagon Creek,
this site is a re-activation of a previous Ministry of Environment gauge and the Region has
approved the continued use at this site.
The third site is north of the Town of Pickering's 5th Line, road allowance on the Brougham
Creek, which passes through the Greenwood Conservation area lands. The site where the
gauge is located is between the road right-of-way and the creek on property owned by The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto as part of lands associated with the Metro Brock North
Landfill site.
All three sites will be operated for a minimum of a five year period under our arrangements
with all flow data being made available towards the land use planning initiatives of the
Seaton Lands.
8762 EXECUTIVE COtNlITTEE 113/96, FEBRUARY 14.1997
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed this proposal and is in
concurrence with this licencing arrangement.
Plan illustrating the specific location are attached.
FINANCIAl. DETAIlS
The costs associated with this licence agreement purchase will be charged to Account 118-
41-502 - Seaton Account.
Report prepared by:
Michael Fenning, ext. 223
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B763
., ~
-.........
',Y'-
,
~~ ~
\
~-,
. -._L: .---
~.- :;
~ ....... ~ ...
I "
~ ~..
"> ~-..:
- '~I
-'
,
... 00/1',
-.' ('. ...
"".' . r,t.... .!'" . --'.
-...q..-- I ~-"
"-..: ., ~ - ,.
7 _.' 'I,V-- ~,,' "
// .
.. /
-/ .' .
" ..
,
\. ...
'.,--
/\
,
,
_.....
J
... -' ~
-
I
.-
... -of'"
~ '"-)
~~~ _-':;t~~;~=~~~~-:~-~ ~
" -
.:: -.
_. '__'"--:r:"-':
8764 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 1",1997
--~ .
map
0.. . ------ .--- - -- --- -- . --.--.. -- - -----,
H i
___,_.""i\'~ i
I
~ ..,... ':'1-;-;.-";-~_J-:-~'_, I
.~. -(,' t T ,', ~... - .' I
..-1- '-f~::~ !~" ~-;~:;.. .r ,
. iiI::::(-., + '......--t..t\,::.' "
.. ". r- - I I
~ ':... -" --' " f q- . ~ ~
. f ~ -l. t"':-'; '~>-'~_'. r i ; - : I
I
. r. - a:. en' (. ~" - - l'
.\ -' ., -:::y -.,.. - /, (/ . > '1 ,I I
--t'.:.1~ ~ ).. __.. .,-. " ~t'"'.....: ,~. _ I': 1
;:::'ij .;~ 1-- , t.J ,l-- _) ',_~. .;A ~ _;_'--- ~. - , J. - .
....--..,-. 1: -.-; Ola; ~~/, . _,-- j-I'I'~:
'. ~ \' . - . - -"'1:": ./ ,
': ." -- I ;... .....-:- _ ~ _/ \,
, .... -,,:,," . ~ 'i .-:-..: =: -:'" -:;. 7" :.\ . . ,1 ~', I ~. ..
. '.'" -- -' ~~: \ . . . -- . ~ ~ ~
-_:......---:- en'.- . -. 'f I ~.". '! N .
-- ~'~--- ,. . - /" -~, -~--;-. - J - ~ ~ -, ; t
---:" -. ; .oJ .. . , '. , ~ I ~ -9'... ~q
; '....- ~. :. .-=-=-~..-,- i--' ! .... ~ ~~. ~ ! ~
.. - - - ...- -- ~ . .. ------- " . . / . ... s. ~ c:
i -~ -r, : i r .' . \.- ""r ~I' \ '. ,,- ~ =:!
>" . ,;_. -_C', . '~'i'-\'< o~- , ,\ \~
' '."-' !~.c' \1.::;,_- ..{)..-,'~
-,,,",,,, . ..' ,- . -_.~~ ---,.-".. ~. -i:. :(
-- - 0 . -C--- ~-\ 'I -, - oJ
---:'..-.- _'f'" .... ~ _-.\ . l.......
-=~}'<.__'.... ..- l.~ ~~.:j.~ ~ ,<~~--f'~. ~:-~_.' - J~'~_.~, j~
....; "::: - . \ - , \- 1,.4 - .o::--.or-'" t . \ to
- . t ,-- , '-- \ \ 1- .--, ..::. ." " \ .. -' r.
_r;..=_" ,....,--~f --:;.'- ... :"::k :. -...- .
-1-'-~ - .' . ....t- ""..-:.' -,' ~ 4," _ rf-
, ~..~ ~ \' -- ,,~- - '.. . ,:-1: _-=-ow:". -"" , ~~ ',:':: \.. '*
---- ,------ f 1/_.. ,-- \ .:....: 'l~!:''''C
~ .:. ..~ - :.- ~_ ,~-'- ,c--\" _- " ~"--, - _ ::\ _~) ,
--~--_.-- '7' -' \.,..~ - ri -.t'"
.+-~ , ~ ~.-;- ":__i.~> . : --~- ;~--","-:"" ":-~ ')
... .,\. _ ~-- .r , ........ "W""-...... / ~\ ~
' 1 . ~., .,: \ \; . ,-.-' .- - .
i \,\ , ~ '~." ,. ' ...-- .'---c:-- '\l-?
=-;-"----~-+::: ~.-,"-';'=:-:-\.. ":::'-...-:-(1'/'~:,:_:-.: i"
. ,,~/ ~~ ':'-, _~\ . 'a~ _ .-.'-=""'4' "- -'ill
" . ~ ~ ~~-:..l:1~ - _ -. \ : '.; ~ ~ ~:f,., I_
, .:...- -- \ ~\, -oJ. -=""-1
, _..:.. - ~-L~' . - ._~\.J-_., \ _ ';...- - ...~-)t~~\-.~ li ~:
I --..' :. '\ ~ : -=-':;~'\ .. ~I,... - --'-~ -.:0$,. ~ - \ h
, .." - _ ~ ,~~'''' "_~ --
'..- ". I'.' 0::2--:':: .-, '-- ,-' ~~ -" i~
I ' ::- ~', ~-- \:' ,,- ~- -' -.." ~ ->.~ :~,' ~ : ---- -: " ~ -,;~.;:: i':~(j:., ~ ~~i
I
! '--~'~~->'. ,.~... ._,~ "',.-, ,:"I'
; -- ':-.-'. ~\ l'--~'~~\' ;.:..' ':~~-.-~:q \ ~l~~.
, -. ,-,.' '--~.~~-=. ,~_,-d "i> . ?~'
:-.~:._~ :-\.:-;--~ ~-:..; -'.:\.., ~,.". ,. .r
. '''', . . ")...---- _. .."\. >~;'"' .-.--, .-
.- -. ". ~ '.' '.~ ,-". ~,. .'. "J
-----f---l.. r -' -" -t:.(.. . .., '.",.~I .~ ~
- .'" . , . I - ....(" .. .. ..
=: ,. ......<... :-....._..J. _~L_.\ J'~:J~...( ( 'i~""
./: -.:. .. - -. 7- -' . j i;' \' ; ~-. i . \\, -: WI /' .. .>.; ':.." :: ~~~
; ~ 0 \ _- ~-=-=- . ../ /',- ~ / . \':" -
. - :-"~r - -:- -:: - '~-_~:-:.- . - - ~. 1 ~:~ .:' ~/ ''-
_-_=;..___. ~ ~ ,r _ _~. ", (
---r ~ ~ .,",: ,,- _ >>.'- _ . ..,' " "
1 :,' ~ ~', ..~.. ': _ Y .J/ '. i:...~ ."" /
. ~:: ;1';;". :;"':,:~~; .'10 /<~~<\
".' ~.'." - to-V
'..... ~ ~/ . . ; ....... ,.' v"t. ~A- ,.-
.' t ,,",' , ' \ "" . > _ _ ....' -, h ~__ '_
'-* .-' :,,' --' '.I"~ -:- ~
~ .... . - "!.;II . ,
, ., '>' -: '::>.... . f':_'
,- ' .. ,. -' '- ."
::.\*, two _ ' -/ ;i-;; /' .1.- ~
\ ,...............".. ,...-~. ..r':.3 - '0(" . .
\.. .-.. \, ,; ;J, ,-'
"t - ,'\ . '- - I
''" --I ,.-:. ....'" "'-- . -~ .._
- .,\" ':'. .---' 0, :./ ,.... ..," ~
:c-~ " .; _ .' .......,,_ ? -," " . ,
-4;\,~ v' " .',. ;. "... , '"
2.i:~"" . ',-.-",,- --,.- .' ~2~
I -_ " ., -' ~(........ __-
j '~.. ~ '-' :t::. !
_.~ ...i - !
- , ,.. ,
-. C '\
'::: .i .,. ,
--- ------ ---- ----
....
EXECUTIVE COM\1ITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B765
The following item was discussed in closed session.
RES. #8231/96- RESTRUCTURING OF THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF
GREATER TORONTO
In order to meet the fundraising needs of the Authority, it is necessary
to restructure The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto, to
improve its capabilities and effectiveness.
Moved by: Brian Harrison
Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the restructuring of The Conservation
Foundation of Great. Toronto, .. recently approved by their Board of Directors, be
supported;
THAT the Authority approve the establishment of a new Development Unit reporting to the
Chief Administrative Officer of the Authority;
THAT the curr..t staff of The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto be transferred to
the new Development Unit, effective March 1, 1997;
THAT the operMing costs of the Development Unit, Including the curr...t staff costs,
continue to be funded by The Conservation Foundation;
AND FURTHER THAT the Authority, in conjunction with The Conservation Foundation,
recruit Met fund . skilled professional to head the Development Unit, subject to funding
being available through the 1997 budget approval process, with the objective that within
the time frame of the Authority's three year Business Plan, the entire operating costs of the
Development Unit will be recovered from a percentage of the funds raised. . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In August of 1996, the Black Creek Pioneer Village Business Plan Sub-Committee, presented
its report to the Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board. The Sub-
Committee's report made four recommendations. One of these recommendations dealt with
the need to review the governance structure of the Authority. This review was undertaken
and the results of this review have been approved by the Authority at its meeting in
December 1996, to be implemented as of the Annual Meeting in February 1997.
Another recommendation suggested some changes to the structure of The Foundation
related to setting up a special standing committee of The Foundation whose sole
responsibility would be to raise funds for Black Creek Pioneer Village.
B766 EXECUTIVE COM\1ITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
In order to implement this separate committee, it was recognized that some restructuring of
The Foundation may be required. It was also recognized that additional fundraising and
office management expertise was required in order to meet the increased fund raising
demands. The Authority in approving this concept, directed staff to work with The
Foundation in developing a new structure and to report back.
Based on these discussions and a recent one day workshop with Authority staff and
Members and Foundation staff and Members, the following recommendations and
supporting material were presented and approved by the Board of Directors of The
Foundation at their meetinp 'leld on January 22, 1997.
.,. " IS RECOMMENDED THA T THE CONSERVA TION FOUNDA TION CONCUR IN THE
PROPOSAL THA T A DEVELOPMENT UN" BE ESTABLISHED W"HIN THE
CONSERVA TION AUTHORITY, REPORTING DIRECTL Y TO THE CHIEF
ADMINISTRA TIVE OFFICER OF THE AUTHORITY, AND THA T THE STAFF OF THE
FOUNDA TION BE TRANSFERRED TO THA T UN" EFFECTIVE MARCH " 1997.
" IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED THA T ~ A. MCLEAN WORK W"H DESIGNA TED
AUTHORITY STAFF TO DETERMINE THE ADMINISTRA TIVE ARRANGEMENTS
REQUIRED TO GIVE EFFECT TO THIS ACTION AND REPORT TO THE NEXT
MEETING OF THE FOUNDA TION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR RA TIFICA TION. ·
This unit would provide support to the fundraising activities of both the Foundation and
the Authority. While not reporting directly to the Foundation, the Unit would provide
support to the Foundation and the Chair of the Foundation and/or his designate will be
involved in all significant decisions concerning the Unit.
The Unit would be responsible for:
. Providing fundraising expertise;
. Planning fundraising activities;
. Training staff and volunteers;
. Research and cultivation of prospective donors;
. Coordinating fundraising activities;
. Ensuring good internal and external communication
re: fundraising
activities and results;
. Engaging in fundraising as appropriate;
. Administration and information systems for fundraising;
. Staff support to the Conservation Foundation.
The Head of the Unit would be a member of the MTRCA Management
Committee.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ~ 3196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B767
Adequate resourcing is essential. Staffing could include seconded MTRCA staff.
The intent is for the Unit to be funded through levies against funds raised. Bridge
financing may be required during the start-up period.
-2. " IS RECOMMENDED THA T THE CONSERVA TION FOUNDA TION SUPPORT
THE RECRU"MENT OF A SKIllED PROFESSIONAL TO HEAD THE
DEVELOPMENT UN" AND THA T THE CONSERVA TION FOUNDA TION AND
THE AUTHORITY, WORKING TOGETHER, 'N"'A TE THIS ACTION
IMMEDIA TEL Y.
There is strong agreement that, in order to mtHIt the fundraising challenges facing
the Conservation Foundation and the Authority, there is a need to recruit a
professional with broad and responsible fundraising experience as well as good
management experience. The Conservation Foundation staff would report to this
person.
The Chair of the Conservation Foundation, or his designate, would be directly
involved in hiring the fundraising manager. -
DISCUSSION
The Authority's three year Business Plan relies heavily on new revenues to be raised from
many sources. One important source is our Foundation.
The Foundation has been very successful in raising funds for specific projects over the past
many years. It is clear however, if we are to achieve the levels of funding required on a
more timely basis and if the Foundation is to become a centre of excellence for fund raising
support and training, a stronger and better resourced group is required. As Authority staff
have also been challenged to raise funds from new sources, it is imperative these initiatives
are co-ordinated with all other fund raising activities.
The recommendations adopted by the Foundation Board and which are being put to the
Authority in this report, will strengthen the fund rasing capabilities of the Authority and The
Foundation. They will provide for better coordination of our fund raising activities and they
will bring the much needed expertise to support our fund raising needs.
The major change recommended is the transfer of the existing two permanent staff which
currently report to the volunteer President of the Foundation, to a new Development Unit
within the Authority. A new Development Officer with the necessary fund raising and
management skills is to be hired to manage this unit and report to the CAO of the Authority.
B768 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE t13J96, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
The Board structure of the Foundation would not change and would continue to be
responsible for those fundraisinQ activities requested of them by the Authority. The
Development Unit staff would continue to support the Foundation as before.
The other structural change recommended would be the CAO of the Authority would also
become the CAO/Secretary Treasurer of The Foundation. Currently the Authority's CAO
does function as the Foundation's Secretary Treasurer.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Foundation would continue to fund the current operating and staff costs. The
additional cost of the new Development Officer would be borne by the Authority initially. It
is expected within the three year time frame of the Authority's Business Plan, the total
operating costs of the Development Unit would be funded from the administrative fees
collected on the money raised.
The budget requirements and the funding sources for the new fundraising unit will be part
of the Authority's 1997 - 1999 budget process. It is anticipated the Authority's costs
would range from $50,000 to $75,000 in the first year and would decline over the next
two.
For information contact:
Craig Mather, Ext. 240
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B769
RES. #B232196 - BOLTON ARTERIAL ROADS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT,
TOWN OF CALEDON, REGION OF PEEL
A proposal by the Town of Caledon to construct the Bolton Arterial Road
as a bypass to the Bolton urban area and its potential impacts on
Authority lands, policies and programs.
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THE EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report, dated February 7, '997, concerning
the review of the Bolton Arterial Roads Environmental Asses.sment, Town of Caledon, be
received;
THAT, unless there .... further modifications to the fin. Environmental Aaseument
document, the Town of Celedon end the Minister of the Environment and Energy (MOEE) be
advised that the north eat end north weat components of the Recommended
Trenaportation Network will have:
. significant Impacts on the landform features and function. of the Humber River
Watershed;
. significant impacts on the management and operation of the Authority'. Bolton
Resource Management Tract;
AND FURTHER THAT, therefor., The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority cannot support these components of the project. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 1983, the Town of Caledon completed the Bolton Transportation Study which identified
road network improvements to support the expanding urban development. The Bolton
Transportation Study recommended that an eastern arterial be developed along the
Vaughan/King/Caledon Townline Road in two stages, and a western arterial be developed
along the 6th Une. The Bolton Transportation Study was adopted by the Town in 1984 and
the Town proceeded with plans to develop the first stage of the eastern arterial. The
eastern arterial included plans to complete the unopened road allowance between
Queensgate Boulevard (5th Sideroad) and Old King Road. The Town completed an
Environmental Study Report for the proposed works in 1988. In 1989, the Authority
conveyed to the Town of Caledon, a parcel of land adjacent to its Nashville Resource
Management Tract to accommodate the proposed road works.
Concern over the environmental and social impacts of the proposal, including subsequent
phases of the road network improvements, resulted in the project being .bumped up. in
1989 to an individual Environmental Assessment (EA).
Bno EXECUTIVE COM\1ITTEE'-'3J96, FEBRUARY 1",1997
Although the proponent is the Town of Caledon, the Recommended Transportation Network
(RTN) is designed and will function as a regional road. The report indicates that the Region
of Peel has agreed, in principle, to consider assuming the roads, including the detailed
design and construction phases of the project.
The study asseses existing and future traffic demands for arterial road networks around the
Town of Bolton. Stage 1 addresses existing traffic problems within the Town of Bolton and
is proposed to be constructed first. Stage 2 addresses future traffic demands. The report
identifies mechanisms that will trigger the need for Stage 2. These mechanisms include the
capacity of the roadways south of King Street exceeding 90% andlor development
occurring north of Columbia Way. It is anticipated that Stage 2 would not be constructed
for some time.
Preparation of the EA started in 1991. Staff identified Authority policy and program
interests as input to this process. In 1991, staff identified concerns with a .West Arterial
Alternative. on 6th Une as it crosses the Bolton Resource Management Tract. Staff advised
the Town's consultants that:
~he routing of the West Arterial Alternative would require a large unopened area of
Authority lands to be developed for the roadway; a new bridge over a wide, very
steep and well-vegetated valley; and would severely affect the Authority's ability to
use these lands for the intended reservoir site should additional flood control
measures be required to protect the village of Bohon. '
In August 1996, staff commented on the draft Bolton Arterial Roads Environmental
Assessment. The draft report provided a comprehensive assessment of a number of
alternative networks and their impacts on the natural environment. Staff identified
Authority concerns with the RTN where the proposal would negatively affect program and
policy interests and recommended other alteratives for consideration.
Authority staff has now received, for information, a presubmission copy of the final EA
report. Our review of this report notes many improvements to the June 1996 proposal,
however, it has failed to offer satisfactory alternatives to address our major concerns,
specifically the routing proposed for the north east and north west component of the RTN.
The Town of Caledon has endorsed the study recommendations for the RTN and the
construction phasing components of the project. The Town of Caledon on November 16,
1996 adopted the following resolution:
~hat the Bolton Arterial Roads Environmental Assessment by McCormick Ranking be
received;
That the Bolton Arterial Roads Environmental Assessment be forwarded to the
M.O.E.E. for their approval;
That the Preferred Western Arterial Route Extending from Highway 50 Near Major
MacKenzie Drive, North on Coleraine Drive and Duffy's Lane to Highway 50 North of
Columbia Way be built in its entirety as the first priority;"
EXECUTIVE CotlMTTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 Bn1
- -
The Town of Caledon passed a second resolution on December 16, 1996 clarifying its
position on the construction phasing of the project as follows:
'On November 16, 1996, the Council recognized and continues to recognize that,
because of the foregoing jurisdictional and funding limitations, the stages generally
south of King Street may be constructed in advance of those north of King Street. ·
It is our understanding that the EA report will soon be filed with the MOEE.
The final Bolton Arterial Roads Environmental Assessment is of interest to the Authority
because the decisions and recommendations will, in the opinion of staff, adversely affect
the environmental management of the natural resources within the Humber River watershed
including the future management and operation of Authority owned lands.
The following is a summary of the outstanding issues identified by staff.
Eastern Arterial
The Eastern component of the RTN upgrades and completes Townline Road to
approximately the entrance of the Bolton Camp and, then, proposes a new road to cut
northwesterly to join Columbia Way. The proposal is to implement the project in two
stages.
Stage 1 involves upgrading and completing Townline Road from Queensgate Boulevard to
approximately the entrance of the Bolton Camp. Within this section the alignment descends
the steep valley wall of the Humber River adjacent to the Authority's Nashville Resource
Management Tract and crosses the Humber River and Cold Creek. Most of the proposed
works lie within lands regulated for Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways and
subject to the requirements of the regulation.
Stage 2 of the RTN includes the protection of an arterial alignment which will cross two
incised ravines and a forested block through Bolton Camp. The study investigated a number
of alternative alignments, including two recommended by Authority staff. The alignments
with the least environmental impacts were the ones recommended by Authority staff, ie.
using existing Townline Road andlor the existing Bolton Camp entrance. To date, these
options have been discounted due to geometric design requirements and the impacts on the
operation of Bolton Camp, respectively.
Schedule B shows the location of the eastern section of the RTN.
South of King Road
Staff's review of the drAft report identified the impacts the RTN would have on Cold Creek
and the Humber River from both environmental and risk management perspectives.
Modifications have now been made to the location of the alignment to reduce the
environmental impacts on Cold Creek. These changes include shifting the alignment to the
west and reducing the roadway embankment to eliminate the need to alter Cold Creek.
Bm EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
. ~ ~
A hydraulic analysis has been undertaken on the preliminary design of the roadway to
assess the upstream flooding impacts at the existing Humber River bridge on Old King
Road. The design of the roadway within the unopened road allowance is based on utilizing
the existing bridge structure. The hydraulic analysis indicated that the changes in the road
profile would increase upstream flood levels by approximately 0.10 metres. This increase in
flood levels is of concern to staff because of the existing flood vulnerable sites upstream.
It is staff's opinion that there are alternative methods of constructing the roadway and the
bridge structure which would further reduce or eliminate the upstream flooding impacts.
These options should be given further consideration to:
- reduce the existing flooding conditions;
- reduce the impacts of ice jamming downstream of the structure;
- provide public access.
In 1995, the Authority signed a Licence Agreement with the Humber Valley Heritage Trail
Association to establish and operate a trail for recreational hiking within the main Humber
River valley between Bolton and Palgrave. The trail traverses the Authority's Nashville
Resource Management Tract and continues in a north westerly direction through the
Authority's Bolton Resource Management Tract. A section of the trail alignment is located
within the Town of Caledon's unopened road allowance and a trail linkage is proposed at
the Humber River bridge structure.
The preliminary design of the roadway proposes that the trail be accommodated on a
sidewalk adjacent to the roadway or shifted further east onto Authority owned land. The
preliminary design also proposes an at grade crossing at the Humber River bridge. It is
staff's opinion that there are further design options and mitigation measures available which
would accommodate the trail use and facilitate in its construction and implementation. In
particular, the need for an at grade crossing could be eliminated by increasing the bridge
opening.
North of King Road
The route proposed for the new roadway will, in the opinion of staff, result in significant
negative impact.
The vegetation affected includes three different deciduous communities, a conifer plantation
and an upland shrub thicket. These communities in concert with each other, and the
adjacent communities, form the only functional terrestrial linkage from the main Humber
River valley to the Cold Creek valley. At a minimum, interruption in the corridor will be 36
metres wide, however, this does not factor in greater widths of the disturbance that may be
required outside the road right-of-way to address the significant topography of this area.
Although Authority staff has not had an opportunity to carry out a detailed assessment of
this site under the 1993 Environmentally Significant Area(ESA) criteria, it is considered a
candidate ESA. It has the potential to fulfill several ESA criteria, including:
EXECUTIVE COtlNITTEE ..,3196. FEBRUARY 14,1997 Bn3
. CRITERION 2
The Cold Creek has significant groundwater contributions through this reach. If this
area serves as a significant recharge or discharge area, Criterion 2 would be met.
The soils information in the report suggests that recharge in this area is limited;
however, further investigation would be required.
. CRITERION 3
As noted earlier, these wooded communities function as a linkage between the
Humber River and Cold Creek. The significance of this linkage has yet to be
assessed.
. CRITERION 6
The report identifies that this area contains diverse vegetation communities.
The report suggests that the impacts on vegetation in this section can be mitigated.
Authority staff does not concur. Staff's opinion is that the communities cannot be looked at
in isolation due to the substantial function of the entire wooded corridor and estimates that
vegetation removal would affect approximately 2.23 hectares.
Beyond the impacts of this section on terrestrial vegetation and wildlife, this reach also has
the potential to significantly affect landform conservation. Immediately west of Townline
Road, the proposed alignment crosses a well vegetated, steep intermittent tributary ravine.
At the west end of the vegetated area, the proposed alignment crosses another vegetated
ravine. These crossings are proposed to be filled to accommodate the roadway.
The programs and policies of the Authority have as their overall thrust the protection and
rehabilitation of the landform features and functions of valley and stream corridors. It is
staff's opinion that diversity of habitat and the significant landform play an important role in
the natural heritage system of the Humber River valley system. The environmental impacts
within this area would be substantial and cannot be effectively mitigated. Staff is,
therefore, not prepared to support the location of the alignment through the Bolton Camp
because of its environmental impacts.
It is staff's opinion that alternative alignments should be further investigated to avoid the
forested areas and valley systems of the Cold Creek.
Western Arterial
The western portion of the RTN includes the reconstruction of Coleraine Drive from
Highway 50 to King Street and the construction of a new roadway to replace 6th Line
(Duffy's Lane) north of King Street and Coleraine Drive. The location of the western
section of the RTN is outlined on Schedule C.
Bn4 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
South of King Street
The reconstruction of Coleraine Drive south of King Street includes the extension of one
valley corridor crossing and two stream corridor crossings. It is staff's opinion that the
environmental impacts of these proposed works can be effectively mitigated. Staff has no
objection, in principle, to the proposed works south of King Street and believe that
Authority concerns can be addressed through the requirements of Ontario Regulation 158.
North of King Street
Authority staff has concerns with the section of the alignment north of King Street. This
portion of the RTN is located almost entirely within the Authority's Bolton Resource
Management Tract, will affect Authority lands and will cross four valley corridors.
Staff has been involved in various discussions regarding the location of the alignment on
Authority lands and, in particular, the design of the Humber River bridge crossing near
Duffy's Lane. While the consultant tried to address technical concerns with respect to the
crossing of the Humber River, the Authority's issues go beyond any proposed mitigative
design measures and relate to the routing of the RTN across Authority lands and their value
within the Humber River watershed system.
The Bolton Resource Management Tract (RMT) was acquired in the 1960's under the
Authority's Plan for Flood Control and Water Conservation to facilitate the construction of
the Bolton Dam and Reservoir Project. The location of the RTN would affect the Authority's
ability to use these lands for the intended reservoir site should additional flood control
measures be required to protect the Town of Bolton. Should the dam be constructed, the
proposed bridge structure would be susceptible to approximately 10 metres of flooding.
The lands affected by the RTN are currently used for passive recreational and agricultural
uses and restoration projects. The Authority undertook a Forestry Management Plan for the
Bolton RMT in 1984 and a Stream Improvement Management Plan in 1985.
In 1995, the Authority signed a Ucence Agreement with the Humber Valley Heritage Trail
Association to operate a hiking trail through the Bolton RMT. The trail runs parallel to the
top of bank of a valley feature east of Duffy's Lane. This portion of the trail has been
constructed and would have to be relocated to facilitate the RTN.
Duffy's Lane currently crosses through the Bolton RMT, however, it is a two lane "rural"
road with, as we understand, minimal and predominantly local traffic. The RTN proposes to
replace Duffy's Lane with a four lane, paved arterial road and route a new roadway east of
Duffy's Lane to Highway 50. The new roadway will sever Authority property in two
locations. The first is at the intersection of King Street and Duffy's Lane where the
roadway will sever approximately 4 acres of land. We understand that at this location the
alignment was modified to address private landowners' concerns south of King Road. The
second severance occurs east of Duffy's Lane where approximately 1 00 acres will be
isolated from the RMT.
EXECUTIVE COMWTTEE 113/96, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 BnS
The Bolton RMT has developed into an area that contains and links many provincially,
regionally and locally designated, significant areas and contains a wide range and variety of
native flora and fauna. These linkages are critical for the maintenance and dispersal of the
genetic material of native species. The Bolton RMT is key to maintaining a linked
greenspace and is valued for its diversity of form and natural features.
The Bolton RMT contributes significantly to the overall health of the Humber River
Watershed through the protection of natural and cultural heritage features and the
maintenance of the ecological relations and functions, while providing opportunities for
public use. Although the Bolton RMT is not entirely forested, land uses within the tract are
not intrusive and do not prohibit the movement of plant and wildlife species. These lands
contribute to the overall environmental quality of the Town of Caledon and the Region of
Peel.
The report assessed and evaluated a number of alternatives through this section.
Modifications were made to the alignment east of Duffy's Lane to reduce its environmental
impacts. Authority staff is still concerned with the implications of routing an alignment on
Authority owned lands and the future impacts it will have on the management of the lands
and the environmental integrity of the Bolton RMT.
LAND USE PLANNING IMPLICATIONS
Concurrent to the Bolton Arterial Roads Environmental Assessment process, the Town of
Caledon has been updating its Official Plan (OPA 114). This new Plan establishes an overall
strategic direction for the Town of Caledon to the year 2011, concentrating on population
and employment, housing, transportation, rural estate residential and settlement areas,
industrial and commercial development. This matter is scheduled to be heard at an Ontario
Municipal Board hearing this spring.
As part of staff's involvement in this matter, we have raised a series of concerns specific to
the use and operation of Authority owned lands and on the landforms, features and
functions of the Humber watershed.
Pursuant to discussions with Town staff, it is our understanding that the Bolton Arterial
Network Conceptual Corridor remains subject to approvals under the Environmental
Assessment Act; that the actual final alignment will supersede what has been currently
shown on the associated Schedules; and that further detailed assessment of the northern
routes will occur later in the Plan period.
Based on the foregoing, Authority staff is of the opinion that the resolution of this matter is
best done through the Environmental Assessment process, and not as part of the hearings
related to land use planning matters. In accordance with the interpretation provided by
Town staff, we are generally satisfied that OPA 114 remains sufficiently flexible as it relates
to the siting of the final alignment.
Notwithstanding, staff has reserved the right to pursue the Bolton Arterial Road Network
issue depending on the position taken by other participants, through the filing of witness
statements and reports, as part of the upcoming Ontario Municipal Board hearing.
Bna EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE '-'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
.---
The RTN has been conceptually identified within the municipal planning document. We
have provided a copy of the Town's Schedule J , MLong Range Road NetworkM, which
identifies the location of the Transportation Study Area. It would appear that there is
considerable flexibility within the study area for alignments that would not affect the Bolton
RMT and the Bolton Camp .
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
It is staff's opinion that there is enough flexibility in the Town's Transportation Study Area
policy for the North Bolton Arterial Road Network to facilitate alternative alignments. If no
further modifications occur before the circulation of the final EA report for formal comment,
staff request direction to advise the Town of Caledon and the Ministry of the Environment
and Energy of the Authority's concerns and request that these components of the report not
be approved. We would also seek the opportunity to discuss these issues further with the
proponent to determine whether there is a reasonable Transportation Network which will
address both the Authority's environmental concerns and the Town's transportation
objectives.
For information contact:
Alyson C. Deans, extension 269
Gemma Connelly, extension 202
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13198, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B777
map
- :.:: ,
,2
- !
I ~
I
,
STAGE NASHVll.~E
RESOUPC~
CONSTRUCTION / ''/IN''GE'''E~ T
TR"C7
TOW [\j k~ 'o~
......
OF --I.... .~.
:i.'"
,j ~ /o'
. '
C ^' =- r, (l [\i 'i - o '
:-'L-__ _ J :- o'.,,-------
i:: i':: /....
1=
,~ r- -
/j \ -. ,
r j/;
! ; .JI ~I /
! t.J') .. , /
o" \ - i I
,o' {. / I
., -
: :...,'" .............. .
'; _:/'''~'
r ~ ,- I
~OCQ, ~I 'v '.......,
... (.-: ~ op' ..........
,/ '/' ~STAGE -i' ,)
( E" ... ~
~. ~ '... """oJ /
ou"try,"l" ~": .' r. 0 N S T R UteTI 0 N
) .' '10, -
, .
. .
//
I
)
-.
-
..
!)rooosed C~structlo"/Rec'Onttructlcn Fore'5teo ..1.r~~ c::: ~
l=I"otect~c q'9"t at 'Nay c-::.:...:....:.-;.;...... ...., ExtS,trrog 1:"'11 ~e;l..l.:tlon _ll"le c::.. ~
"'ynlciClol BoundarIes .............. P":lcosea :',,1 ~~;:.J!ctto'" _,ne ~'(te"sIOI"l C ~
Aut"ot',ty :I.nea ~ands I I
)--,,_.~-~,- BOLTON ARTERIAL ROAOS SCHEDULE "A"
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
-......,......., RECOMMENDED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
1__- _.__._.......__
- -
Bna EXEC~ COMMITTEE '-'3196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
map
I
I STAGE 2 ' - 3:: :-
,- - :
CONSTRUCTION -., , I::':
I~' :! :/ ~
-,
I ':::' ::
! - .;.
i ...
I . tI
- ;....1
! -:-
,-
+~
~r '/:,~ ?
~~ r.
,~~ j
. :,$J __
i' -\ '""......1
-' - \
.-------'
. 'I, "'-
V \J~S~\/IL~~
-~- ~~SC!....RC::
= \A..l~":'GE\\E~'I-
I "
I -"'-c
i
I
! :"-l\.-i'''v III e
I '--
'.-
I ~ I., -"- . '.-r'"
~ ~~./ ':..'t..., .~,. < ':..." ..........:-
I ,~ 1 :' '", ....:~~
IJI --:~ ..
. '.
- . '. (
...~ .... .' , ..../-:..
(I - '" . - -. ..( '.,
( - - /...../ -j---~~-~~ ~ -.
1 I' 2" il/ l.'-ST-AGE'''::r-
(
f-_.' I .....,
( ;.......... (- // CO-NSTRUC'TION
~' .
. ~"., "
... "'~t.'lloIQ ~
- ll( . <, '~"-
-
>C"'-" 1 '---,.,..... r ...." ". _',
-
. . .. .."'--:::::;....."
..... -,.
- -....
.........
-
=l'ccose1 :on,tro.Jctl0tllf;e-::I",tf\.,C ~,~" ;:'CI'~steCl "'eo: = ~
C"rrrdor O"op.nf O"ote:"'IO" t-"......., ..... I ::",It'''q ;' If ~~~'..l":-':'" _..@ = =
;arOCleseo ;' II O'!~""Cl'I~" _ I'l'! ~ It,,,src,, .:::::::. ~
-.au"'CIC:lQI 2~utldarll!S ............. 0
..a.ut,..or.ty "..."~d L"I'IQS I I MeOI ~t !,q..tf,c:.... :,,.,=~~'"
I' BOLTON ARTERIAL ROAOS SCHEDULE "B"
ENVIRONNENTAL ASSESSNENT
I V -_..~.~_....~ RECOMMENDED TRANS?ORTATION NETWORK
I ,-=-~~~~'.. ~.._- EASTERN ARTERIAL
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 Bn9
-,;:.
map
-
G I ; .
, ,
c ....... ,
\ \
\..-0--"
PAR C E L
,
BOLTON
RESOURCE
vlANAGEtvlENT
TRACT st,
No,1
SCALE
kllorne'te..~
~~ I I
.5 0 .5 1.0
'oposed Construction/Reconstruction Forested Are-: C -=:>
orridor Property Protection ~~?&<&:';;?I Exisiting Fill Regulation Line <::: =:>
Proposed ciil '<egulction Line E,tension <:::::' ~
unicipot Boundaries ................. 0
Jthority Owned Lands t; /' ///-~//-.~-<<<,-%/I Areas of Stgrlfic::nt Concer'"
~ BOLTON ARTERIAL ROADS SCHEDULE "c"
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
, .... .....<DO,..... ........., .... ,.."", RECOMMENDED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
cClnarvo. I CJ'I QlIf'l'9Cr r"'1
. _ "'" _,.. _....... H'.' ....... WESTERN ARTERIAL
-
B780 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE '-'3198, FEBRUARY 1<4, 1997
,--
map
I
... z,.., a ;, ,~. . ~:
...... 0..... ..... -: ~:~.41......~ I
..., ~ ~ ~:c .. .CI,tI~:1J1gd~
.. 0 ~ =: ~ ~o~. ..,~ ."a'lli:"
_iiito-. ~~.. ..::.....~:... Jt
~ ~ g:~ a j; ~ : Q I: ~ ~:~:.:~..~.: a II; .
- .. ';/ · h .~.'.. ; j' .
~ ~a: -= f,. ~ s 3! ~ ~ ~ a:~..::1:!.;i I ! !
'-' c."o z i c ~ :CoI;:;; ~ .,., i.1 ';;.:.;..~~..i ~. 1 :
=:> :z~ w e ~ ~ ~. g~ a s ~ . ~ ~ ;-;:n~:~;~ II..: 3
t&.. <i-t U ~ 3 ~ 0 z~ f \01 ~ ~ )e :~~:::";G: rlo-
S 0 g::~ ~ C:or ~ .. ~ ~ ~1: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~;;"'.id !~! ; :
..... '" . Q a ., 0 U sa . ~ ~ u ~ - :.,. :-=..:~:.. 2~ :::
~~f-' ~iii1x9u9_u..".=..; a. :!".i:,..... ._,.
..... z ~ i: ;:S:I.'II i =
,. '0 · I I J · ! II t f II E-- ::-'~~o"s;; : .. ;
'-' · I 4'. -., . . . _ .
en 0 ~ . . I .!. ZO :.:1:=:::!s: . ! ~ II
E-o . I I" .,::, .~....:,- .
. J Ii .-.......,._~ I .
-- ~ ':.\' .... ~::~m:. :!
I 1~~~~T---- ~ 0\> -VO,~
--- --~---~-------
~ 1 -.--
~ ~ ,
'0 k----..- ______J.______
,---I 11' I
~ '~~
~J-I ~.. '
Q .._.-. _._ ....a.._._.
I. . ;;:::-1 "I.-; ~.t.J",'- ~~. .
I ~ \ .~" "fii~~;r~.
.!, \ ~-, '" ,. . ,..,..
" I---~--~.::-'-- r----- -:'.-- to ~I~. ... ,-
~ \.. i ~ -~;"i._:;~_:"_Cl.,y \
J. 1'. ~ '""- , "- .It~.....",."..~, ,
-----.,.:.:.:::.-.=-p--~-l--"--~... . -------5-~--=.=-::=--
I' : _!L- . l... ~ -_i.__:.-t._._..-.._.
- - - jf--- ~ ,,-, . .. _...
\ I \, I ., ' "
, 1 -:, ~ r\ \, i ,
--L---------------------~~----______.____._______"'l'------.
~" .- -..- . \"\ '" ;I '" '..w .'-"-
\ , , "I " " ,
· , , .\ " 'i ,
____;.I -t-------.l.-------:j\-------.1.------.:T. ;______.._____. ,"
G "-"-1' -.--, . T 3 I .,-- -
, I . ., I~' ,. , a'\
l - I , "\ Ii' ~ , a'\
.-.-"'I-.~-~....:-.~....._.-...IJ..-.r._1__..__. _.~ ._.....-...._._ I"""i
· - - 1 ' z , ---r--' 1 -.... '. .-.'
~ '.." \ \.' . I '
-----r-:~~ .-------t------~~----.,. __L_______..1._______~-----. ~
,t ." \ l" \ .. __. .....
, , 'I ,
--...~_--L-------'t-------l.---....-_l--__w__ ,,__t_______l_______t_____ :
. . I , ,~i I \ T .. ,"._. ....
, · , I L' 'c..
, I , , , I 1 0
---~=-=,...-'-------l-------~-------~------- ......-..-..-..-..;-...~.-.....-.-..-..-
\ 11, I \ " , ,-- tJl
, I" i, i~ \ ~ -
--r-.:'=-~.:\.-ir------~-------~-------..\' ----)---tT--lr-----;-t-------1'.';"";':~ 5
, l' ,\ ~, \ l' 11 IH ~ . '0
L , . '. 'L ,i!. 'I Ql
--r-."......--i------w. :-------r------\t---\w-w-ii--;T---u-:- \ -------1'.:-.-::.::i ~
I 11 "i ".. , 1\ I a I ~': CJ
-"t-:~~_.+._. ~ ~., ._.-P.i-a...;..---.-r-r._.-~--._.~'!..~
~ " " .",,-,;;;- , I ~" i , 1 .... 0
", , II - , , ,e , .-- -1-. 0
- -------.-----~- -------~ ~----r----r w~--~-------~-~-------_ Ql
- -.-, .~ ". ~/ I V I .. . C.....
,\ \\ ,,:'\ I ~ ;\ ,\ 3::l
-t-.. .~ -~=----T~-r I ..i.__~~---1~-t---w---.l.--. 0 "0
~' ., - 1:' II .,~ - \1" Eo< Ql
.,. "I', I I ..c
. , e" Ql
.-------......~--. .Jl\:=i" ,V -.--------. 1,,__L_______.1__w____:'!"__ _ tJ
n I ~I-\~" ~ -, 1 "- · "\ it - 8 tr.l
r, ;, - 'i I "- 11 '
--..,--;~---T-------r--J.\---""-1:"-~--1-\ -~,-..-..-.-\.-r.-.-t~ ..
, , . ., " Q)
, , \. .! , '. -,-~ i '"
.____..,w______________ --------{___w__.,____ ..l--, -.-.---._ _________ v
- - - . . I; --- I'~:-' I' 1-4
; : , a I ! ~i i!~'- . l::l
. 1. t -: ,i1 ........-'... , 0
....--- v ...._.. CI)
- ,
ftD:II.ll:IU.':'t'W
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE t13J96. FEBRUARY 14, 1997 8781
~-
SECTION II - FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ACTION
The following item was discussed in closed session.
RES. #8233/96 - PROJECT FOR THE ACQUISITION Of THE FORMER MINISTRY
Of NATURAL RESOURCES MAPLE DISTRICT OFFICE AND
LANDS
City of Vaughan. Status report on the preparation of a project to
acquire 48.5 hectares (120 acres), more or less, of headwaters of the
East Don River and Oak Ridges Moraine, in the City of Vaughan,
Regional Municipality of York, from the Ontario Realty Corporation.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Michael Oi Biase
THAT staff submit to the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORe) e conditional Offer to Purchase
the Former Ministry of Natural Resources Maple District Office and Lands, 1040 1 Dufferin
Street:
THAT staff finelize the -Project for the Acquisition of the Former Ministry of Natural
Resources Maple District Office and Lands, 10401 Dufferin Street, City of Vaughan,
Regional Municipality of York, dated February 1997- and bring forward a report to the
Members of the Authority for meeting #13/96, scheduled for February 21,1997 or at the
earliest possible date with a recommendation similar to the following:
THAT the -Project for the Acquisition of the Former Ministry of Natural Resources
Maple District Office and Lands, 10401 Dufferin Street, City of Vaughan, Regional
Municipality of York, dated February 1997- be adopted:
THAT the City of Vaughan be requested to approve the project and contribute 25%
of the cost of the project:
THAT The Regional Municipality of York be requested to approve the project and
contribute 25% of the cost of the project:
THAT the Province of Ontario be requested to approve the project and contribute
25% of the cost of the project:
THAT the remaining 25% of the cost of the project be funded from other Authority
revenue sources i.e. land sales, The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto and
other similar potential funding sources or some other funding parties:
...continued
B782 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
THAT Authority offidel. be ..thorized end directed to take the necessary action to
complete the trenuction, induding obtaining provinciel and My additional approval.
which may be deemed necessary end the execution of any neceaaary documents;
AND FURTHER THAT. Menagenwrt ..... be developed, In consultation with the City
of Vaughan end the Regionel Municipality of Y orlt.
AMENDMENT 111
RES.IIB234/96
Moved by Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT staff develop . busin.... plan for the acquisition of the former Ministry of Natural
Resources Maple District office and lands, prior to Full Authority approval.
AMENDMENT #1 WAS .................................. CARRIED
AMENDMENT #2
RES. #8235/96
Moved by Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT paragraphs 4, 5, end 7 of the main motion be deleted and replaced with the
following:
THAT the City of Vaughan be requested to approve the project and contribute 1/3 of
the cost of the project:
THAT the Regionel Municipality of York be requested to approve the project and
contribute 1/3 of the cost of the project;
THAT the remaining 1/3 of the cost of the project be funded from other Authority
revenue sources i.e. land sales. the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto and
other similar potentiel funding sources or some other funding parties:
AND FURTHER THAT paragraph 6 of the main motion be deleted.
AMENDMENT 112 WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRI ED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS ..................... CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 113196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 8783
BACKGROUND
The Members of the Authority at meeting 112/96 held on January 24,1997 adopted the
following resolution:
Res. IA282196
THA T subject to the approval by the Regional Municipality of York and the
City of Vaughan, staff be directed to develop a project for the acquisition of
the former Ministry of Natural Resources Lands at Maple including an
appropriate cost sharing formula;
AND FURTHER THA T staff be directed to negotiate with the Ontario Realty
Corporation (ORC) to secure an acquisition agreement.
AMENDMENT
RES. IA283196
THA T the Chair of the Authority advise the appropriate political
representatives of the Province of Ontario of the environmental significance of
this property and request their assistance in ensuing that it be retained in
public ownership.
Council of the Regional Municipality of York, at its meeting of January 6, 1997, adopted
that following resolution:
a) The Region of York, in conjunction with the MTRCA, the City of
Vaughan, and the Town of Richmond Hill, formally express its interest
in entering into negotiations with the Ontario Realty Corporation
regarding the former Maple MNR lands;
b) Negotiations be subject to ORC completion of studies to resolve
outstanding issues including, but not limited to, liability issues relating
to well shutdown and aquifer rebound, on-site contamination, and top-
of-bank issues;
c) Staff are directed to report back to Council on terms and conditions
that may be negotiated.
Council of the City of Vaughan, at its meeting held on January 20, 1997, adopted the
following resolution:
a) THA T the Region of York, in conjunction with the MTRCA and the City of
Vaughan, formally express its interest in entering into negotiations with the
Ontario Realty Corporation regarding all or part of the former Maple MNR lands
supported by appropriate environmental studies;
B784 EXECUTIVE CotvHlTTEE 1J13J98, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
b) THA T negotiations be subject to ORC completion of studies to resolve outstanding
issue including, but not limited to, liability issues relating to well shutdown and
aquifer rebound, on-site contamination, and top-of-bank issues;
c) THA T staff be directed to report back to Council on terms and conditions that may
be negotiated as soon as possible; and
THA T the recommendation contained in the following report from the Commissioner
of Planning and Development, dated January 13, 1997, be received.
Since the adoption of Resolution IA282/96 a number of meetings have been held involving
Authority staff, representatives of the City of Vaughan, the Regional Municipality of York
and the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC). Staff has also engaged the assistance of an
independent appraiser, the Authority solicitor and other experts to ensure that all required
information is at hand to attempt to conclude a successful purchase agreement. ORC has
stipulated that the public agencies must submit an offer to purchase the property by
February 18, 1997.
Staff of the City of Vaughan will report to Council on Monday, February 17, 1997 and staff
of the Regional Municipality of York will report to their planning committee on Thursday,
February 13,1997. These reports will be provided as status reports on the negotiations
with ORC and adVise of the Authority staff's recommendation for the purchase of the
property.
The property contains approximately 48.5 hectares (120 acres) and is located on the east
side of Dufferin Street, north of Major Mackenzie Drive and is Municipally known as 10,401
Dufferin Street. The property is centrally located within the Authority's area of jurisdiction
and is in the Oak Ridges Moraine.
The site is located in the headwaters of the East Don River and is traversed by two valley
corridors which make up approximately 68 acres of the site. The valley corridor contains
high quality, fresh to moist, deciduous and coniferous, mature forests. The north 12 acres
of the property is primarily plantation. The plantations are composed of white and scots
pine, white and norway spruce and cottonwood. There are additional plantations within the
eastern 33 acres of the property. These plantations were established as a research
arboretum. The collections of poplars, pines and spruces are unique having been developed
from sources all over the world. The Faculty of Forestry at the University of Toronto has
expressed great concern at the potentia -oss of the genetic material on the site.
According to the information received from ORC there are approximately 44 buildings
containing in total approximately 125,000 square feet. The buildings consist of offices,
research laboratories, greenhouses, a fish hatchery, sheds, pump houses, a water treatment
plant and a sewage treatment plant.
A draft copy of the project is appended for the assistance of the Members of the Executive
Committee. The final version of the project will be provided at such time as the purchase
agreement has been executed.
EXECUTIVE COM\1ITTEE t13J96, FEBRUARY 14,1997 8785
OUTSTANDING ISSUES
a) Complete negotiations as to a satisfactory purchase price.
b) Negotiating a cost sharing arrangement with the funding partners.
c) Cost and funding of interim management of the property.
d) Developing a long term management plan for the property.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Negotiations as to the amount of the purchase price are ongoing as at the time of the
writing of the report. Additional details as to the cost estimates and financing will be
provided to the Members of the Authority at such time as the purchase agreement has been
executed.
INTERIM MANAGEMENT
The property is presently exempt from realty taxation because of the provincial ownership.
The property will be taxable upon completion of the acquisition. Based on the information
available the realty taxes on the property would be approximately $135,000. per year. The
Ministry of Natural Resources has indicated that the yearly operating costs for the complex,
when fully operational, is approximately $250,000. This could be reduced substantially by
shutting down and/or demolishing some or all of the buildings.
Authority staff has undertaken a preliminary assessment of the buildings on the site and
further information in this regard will be available at such time as the project is finalized.
The potential for the property to be rented or leased on an interim basis to a third party or
other parties to off-set the costs is also being investigated.
WORK TO BE DONE
a) Completion of negotiations with ORC and representatives of the City of Vaughan and
Regional Municipality of York.
b) Develop a management plan to establish interim and long term use of the property in
consultation with the City of Vaughan, the Regional Municipality of York, Province of
Ontario, the Don Watershed Council, special interest groups and the public.
Report prepared by:
Mike Fenning, Extension 223
For information contact:
Don Prince, Extension 221
Brian Denney, Extension 242
Mike Fenning, Extension 223
B788 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
RES. #8236/96 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND
Adjacent to No. 6990 Goreway Drive, City of Mississauga
Mimico Creek Watershed. CFN 10999
The Authority is in receipt of a request, to consider disposing of a parcel
of Authority-owned tableland adjacent to No. 6990 Goreway Drive, City
of Mississauga in the Mimico Creek Watershed.
Moved by: Loi Hancey
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT 1M potMtiaI disposal of a parcel of tabIeIMd adjacent to No. 6990 Goreway Driva,
City MilliIlBUge, Regional Municipality of Peel, be referred to the Authority staff for review
in eccordance with established Authority policies;
AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future
date recommending further action. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This issue is being brought to your attention in accordance with Resolution IA289/94,
adopted by the members of the Authority at a meeting held on January 27, 1995. This
resolution requires staff to bring requests for the purchase of Authority lands forward and
requires Executive Committee direction for staff to begin the technical review, agency
circulation and public consultation, at the end of which a recommendation will be made as
to whether the property is surplus to the Authority's needs and can be considered for
possible disposal.
At Authority Meeting 15/96, dated June 28, 1996, the following motion to refer Resolution
IA 129/96, was adopted, directing staff to report on the proposed land exchange and sale
of lands in the vicinity of 6990 Goreway Drive, City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek
Watershed and requirements for environmental audit.
The Authority is in receipt of a proposal from A. Mantella &. Sons Limited, to consider
conveying to them a parcel of Authority-owned tableland adjacent to their holdings, at No.
6990 Goreway Drive in the City of Mississauga. As part of the transaction A. Mantella &.
Sons Limited is offering to convey approximately 7.9 acres of flood plain and valley land
adjacent to Authority holdings.
If the subject Authority lands were deemed to be surplus to the Authority's needs and an
exchange were to be recommended, then an environmental audit will be carried out on the
Mantella lands before the Authority takes title. Phase I environmental audits are carried out
by the Authority prior to the closing of property acquisitions. Option to Purchase documents
have a clause entitling the Authority to carry out an environmental audit and if the Authority
is not satisfied with the environmental condition of the lands, we are released from all
obligations arising pursuant to the agreement.
Report prepared by: Ron Dewell, ext. 245
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/96, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B787
-,
map
-
;; i ;
""
~ .. z; ~
-
~ ~:r,Ti-"
~ l( t I ," " I
~_..J.;_..1I
.. ~
- ~
~ ..
,."
. ~~
~
;:
,
Go
~
-'
...
~
;:
: \ .--:. .;-:-~. ( ! ,
,~ ~ ',.,
., ---'
.........-:: ~
\ :. ..Ie'./'"" _'
:. '" ~.. ,/
.l =="
t \ ;c; ~ '/
V'.-~-
---
- --
~,.::. \ :',' /.-':<:: \ t l \...
I
" ~ ~. i .-
. .
~
.i..
~- ..
..1 _
"
-
I
~
,,-,,-,/
B788 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE...3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
---
map
v:f:-..~...~!~;~<~~~:_,:~ - I
.~, ". ..' .,. ..-...."'-~,
{, I::"",~~..,,:~:;::~:~~.~:: :,:~'..,~'..;:~'~:~...'.3 ;"~.,-~,';:.'~:~ ~;.:::~~.
,,/ ~, - ',__ . _ " " ".. ,.. "o~ '. _ ,. " ,'_ . .~. ,
a...j ,:' ~ 5~~f;{~~Jf~~~9i?X~Et~~'~~i~~'i~'~0W~0\ ~
_1/ / ,",-'-":. .....-'.-'-,.. ~,-. J. ~~"-"-":--'--:'1."" ~ ~.
-' ,,:' ..~~~~t~::f~0~i~~~;f~:~~~~tJG~{~~~'~f;{[E~~~~'. ~" ~,
1 j _,.. .....,._ -.....,.. .-,.. 'f"'''''''',..'' wtl:.~
r I ~.;-;..._.::.~':..-.;:.....,....7;,,,~'~_""::';-"\:";\"1~1.1~.j;'~'~1'".:s;:,',..... ~~ _
I \ ....'- .-..........1.......'.... -0_'" II ...., I\'_~ '-". .......~/,~_.\ ~ _
- g"" '.. ,.-", - '...,.'..... ..- 4
'/' --) .:..~..:.i:.~...-'.:.:->..l__h~........'_'>l.,-:::,..::.~I_~,-:I-;..'....~..~..r:... .....,..1~ "P\ ~
)1 ':. ~..;:~:~..~;;:~~. ;~~:?~~7~;:J.~::::-~-:~:~~~~~,~~..:;,'..:.::ti~~~~'.\~~ ~.
I. ,I..-....(...\:."-,....~...".'....... _\~\..".'",'\'-,...\....."~....."...\_\ ~,
. ~~ ~... --, ~ \..~ ..;;1:..::_....:~ '.-";:--'.:'::'J... W' ~;'"...I~/:'I~~~ ,..('.....,:. ;.,,"~:j",'.Jt. .
"'. J ' ';:~...~..~~~::.~~..r~~.I;~--~~:...~,-:.~':--~',~,,1 "'I':.'? '...' ~"7;--~":....~'"':..~'" :"~::'~"; \1,
. I' 1',....1...,... ."....,-.......-....,.....,.."4"""',, "1"" I..,'............,..,.. ..-"\~fII"'€
" /I.\.~".~~:..7.~~'I~~(:._..(~:';.':.:..~.-'::...:,::,,;:I!:::'~:7 ;'.'~;.~:::.r:.-~":'-,~, ~~ ;r-.
I fi-"'-"":''':'''~':~'':'~'~'-': .- ..'._.... -. .- . '''--:'''-..,,:.;'!t... ~r-
..,-,..,.'.;.'.-..:. ORITY LAND '.;..~..~'.,...' .\ ..-
~ "."':. . ;' "':'a I, ~ ...;.~-;~~~:~..: :.::'~ ...~.
,~_.;u.=,~~.. AU I H , ... "." .. _. ,; .."......,..I"...~_._,.,., I.. ,
1 ... . ." . ".' -.... .. ,.... -~,-..... ,.."-'" ......--....... ...... _.. .
- -".......'-..7"~..."....'..,---_....... .....--..,.."..----..~;...."l....<.:..--.,-r.. ,.~\. (
_.~ "~'~I:~..~':--~}..c.......~'~',or;': ~:~',,~f";.:....~~:!_~;:/~:..../:...:~~:;:.~~..:.::...~~ ~;~ " ~ '.
-- -~.J'l~:.~:ry~j.,.~...:~~.~;~;~.:~;;.~--:.-.A"~~'..:.:-:;,-::~~',-::-:;.:'~~~ ~\ SUBJECT AUTHORIT
..- ..-'~ -,;,.r.....;. :.:........ ,~;.'" -............ - -..':.1'..... .:"::...., ,......, ..'... .......'~~:.:.-. ~I_~
r: .-,1 ~.,~ ,;I..II~..I..'\I..~"..~:-.\.-..~.:. :....~~l~....:......'.'....~~-~:'...J~.....\~"/:';. PROPERTY
; ~..~~fh?~WE'ii{~;~~~~tWit-;i~flI:~~\f~ \t(
./.~- .. .. ..'.- -'.'. ',- .d,._' ". . '. ,,,,". '."'.' -'_"~' ." ',-... _. \<C; '.
':g ~ -.:~~;'~~i~Z~/~:;;'~~~::::~:~~}~~:;~:~~~:~;~:Y:~:~~j~r" .. . .~ . ~-.
.;.[), '. ";." "'J~' 'co:' -. '_ ,_. .,o>~......~,,~L. ''''.< ,!,. .. - \\ 6: ~
If oJ 0"<" .., r. .. ........"'~ __~.. ~ -._ 1;....../. \ __ -
.' .\~. .." ~ ..". .. ........ . :::'~~',=, --...r..,:,~..,.~fr:)"..r.Ao-
:~~~~,.'.'a:.~';;,::...~:::;;~.~)i;.~.~:...::=:.:.-:1.;..:.!1q::' '. ,
..~~....:: ~",l. :o:.''':~:'J;'II'..;a'":'\"." .--.. . .~_.,.-_..~.:JJu.:~ ,
. ",.0.., , .1 - -0 BE .... ~_....""" ,a ' .
-;'!:~ PROPERiY PROPOSEO I ~ -et!~'?; ". '.
, 1:0 TO THE ).UTHORITY :,..... "..:& ';.f .. .. '
. : CONVEY - _, ,_, _" .: ": ,.o<t".~.:,.,..~:O:;iI.:: \ . '.
~. ....t..... - . - ~ ::;. ....._.7 ...' -..:- ..~ -'~'....'r: '_' .
'.1" ~,~ ~ ..."':;",01 ':'-~ ='" ::-'~:'...-........" .... ~.rc'..-:'~~"'':: '. . ..
~i;~~.x'.~ ~-.: .~::;;....)e.~.:,~::J-="':~~;;;~....e.:.~.,.=...~.':r':... \ \ \
: J';?:;7v'~""'~'T..";~i:""':;i~:;'f':."~'':;;''~~:''~.:o::~~''~'f.>' 'i:~~- -\
.-7.~.B.j'1.;~,itk9:-~~:.~~:.~:;:,.,{;.:';J:~:;'::.",~...~'j::-~ 6990 GORE,\\,':\ Y
1S::/~'''~tI~~ ~~-.~:r.:..)::;::::..~='."'?~;;; .~~~:..~ .'.
'J-E.'-~it;:.~ .~:.,;~~..:;:.':..,.:::,eZ.....:'~" ~:- DRIVn::- :.
~A"I7.,Q" -... ~....;:.~~:-::~:~~1~'~' ..;~ ..L
.,,"W. . ...... :">oO...~._~;:;-.. ....
::;.,~,:;" . ~ .,... '~.~i~'..~~" ...-' _
.- 'i'4~ ,- - -
~ ,I;II~~_,:..:.,~ -.
.. .,." .........\
'. ~ 1<~;~~~ - .
~~ '~~;<=~..~~! . -.a:'f I j
... .........,..'..."..1.." ;.o:~;::::':a;I..':-..::
'~'"~~(~,7.....;;,.....1:r . r ::-:;~:J:~;;: &...:... =-=
... .........,.:/"~\ . 1. , -"'""".-_ ..... -_
~~..~ ':";~i::~\... . :.. ; ;~............ ,::- . .-__ . ... ; ! .
....~'~.,. ' , . .e:=;;: \., ....J. ,- I r .
.~....;~. ...: ,._";1:1,'. . -:-- e '..:.--, . - :.
..-;~:.":':""';:"'::~::::"'~:",:,.., ... ...":"~ .:.~:..:;;-~....' ! ::.~ =- -- ..
..~. '... .. .,~,. '.. .ll ../ ,....
'~~~~~~(~~:)?~':}~:~;:~'" : '.?f ":kf :". / I "1)" -
.-,,'. ".:""~~"""""'. .... . -~..
:!"~"':':"'A"'"":,::,_~,,, ';..' ..:-:::,:::........; '~'-,.. . ... ~
.....,..-..,,_.. . ',,,,,.. '. . ~-.
..~;;1I::,..~:.;:7:'~"'1.~~....:'~._:\.. ....... ",",:~~_~'.::::;;,.. - .
"".~,;"lo,,""" ~..,...~" J . .
': ,'l:.',~: ~.:~::~ ".':?;::;,'; ',':,. ~::. ;:~'~"'~ . ~ \
.........--...." '.'':'''''''':_'' ,. ...\.",-..........:.........;:\., . , ':.. ...
1,..~:.:::..~~~';~...~:~~. ~:'~';':"'..:~~ ~,::,.:~~"'...l_.~~:;~~::, .. .. .
,_.~" ..... ..1:..._.,.,.... ..,;.....: I, .'w.... ~...'" . ~~
~ \, ..,...,...," ""_._-:...:~:'.,... . ,
~'\ ,\:,. '--- '__w -:-. .. "
; "
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE'" 3196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B789
- -
RES. #8237/96 - BRUCE'S MILL CONSERV A nON AREA
Application for a change in the zoning By-Law covering the Bruce's Mill
Conservation Area to permit outdoor concerts.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT the zoning By-Law application, to the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, to permit the
holding of outdoor concerts at the Bruce'. Mil Conservation Area be approved;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority official. be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to obtain approval of the zoning By-Law chang.. ......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting 12/96 the Authority endorsed Resolution IA42/96 which states in
part:
"THA T staff be directed to continue to seek opportunities for special events at
Conservation Areas".
As part of the new revenue initiatives process staff have been examining the potential for
additional outdoor entertainment on Authority lands.
These outdoor concert activities are governed by the bylaws of the municipality in which
the lands are located. While the majority of lands in question are zoned OS (Open Space)
the definition and interpretation of this designation vary considerably from municipality to
municipality.
The Bruce's Mill Conservation Area has been identified by MTRCA staff as having particular
potential due to its facilities and location. Discussions with staff at the Town of
Whitchurch-Stouffville has identified the need for a minor amendment to the existing OS
designation to permit outdoor concerts in the park.
The MTRCA has offered entertainment as an integral part of park programming for a number
of years. Whitchurch-Stouffville staff have classified this type of activity as an ancillary
recreational use and therefore acceptable under the current zoning. The staging of an
event, whose sole purpose is entertainment, will require a change in the By-Law to permit
outdoor concerts as an additional use.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
There will be a charge of $750.00 for the By-Law application and another charge of
$750.00 upon approval of the By-Law.
For Information contact:
Bob Burchett, ext. 367
B790 EXECUTIVE COM\1ITTEE 1t13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
RES. #8238/96 - AGRICULTURAL NON POINT SOURCE (AGNPS) MODEL
PROJECT - TRAINING
Contract with the University of Guelph to provide technical training and
support for staff involved in evaluating the Agricultural Non Point Sowce
Model as a tool in watershed management.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT the University of Guelph be retained by the Authority 8t . coat not to exceed
.'0.000 to provide training and technicelsupport.. pert of the MTRCA-MOEE Agricultural
Non-Point Source (AGNPS) Model Project. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At its meeting 111/96, the Authority resolved:
Res. IA264/96
~HA T the Authority enter into an agreement with the Ministry of Environment and
Energy to extend to March 31, 1998 and expand the scope of the existing
Memorandum of Agreement, covering the period March 13, 1995 to April 30, 1996
concerning the provision of scientific expertise in watershed planning, in order to
assess the use of the Agricultural Non Point Source Model as a tool in watershed
management;
AND FURTHER THA T staff be directed to take the necessary action to implement the
above-noted Memorandum of Agreement and its workplan. ·
Assessment of the use of the Agricultural Non Point Source (AGNPS) Model as a tool in
watershed management will involve three component tasks:
1) completion of a Geographic Information System (GIS) interface to
facilitate running the model;
2) model calibration and running using input data and alternative
management strategies assembled for selected study watersheds; and
3) model evaluation and technology transfer.
The project manager from the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MOEE) has identified a
need for training and technical assistance for core project staff from the MOEE and MTRCA.
Training would address the calibration and running of the AGNPS model and GIS-RAISON
software employed in the project and technical assistance would be needed for the
interpretation of model results. The project manager has recommended that researchers
with the University of Guelph be contracted to provide these services.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B791
--
Specifically, the University of Guelph would provide:
1. Technical support and training to project staff during two 3-5 day
training workshops on the use of AGNPS model and RAISON software.
2. Technical assistance with the assembling of databases, running the
AGNPS model and interpreting results.
3. Participation in two technology transfer workshops, including
presentations on the use, limitations and applications of the model.
All tasks would be completed by December 31, 1997.
RATIONALE
Researchers with the University of Guelph have developed extensive knowledge on the use
of the AGNPS model as a tool in studying non-point source pollution loadings to surface
waters and are aware of the state-of-the-art use of GIS technology in the field of non-point
source pollution. They have also worked cooperatively with the National Water Research
Institute towards the construction of an interface for the AGNPS model and its link with the
GIS-RAISON decision support system.
Due to the extensive and unique knowledge of the University of Guelph researchers, it is
recommended that they be contracted to assist with the joint MOEEIMTRCA AGNPS model
evaluation project.
BENEFITS
This project will advance the Authority's ability to recommend effective watershed
management strategies for addressing problems associated with non-point source pollution.
By involving the University of Guelph, MOEEIMTRCA can benefit from the University's
extensive background knowledge and can more quickly and efficiently evaluate the use of
the model in watershed management applications. Furthermore, staff will receive training
that will be useful even after the present project is completed.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The Ministry of Environment and Energy has provided $45000 in funding for the AGNPS
model evaluation project and it is available in Account #118-65.
For information contact:
Sonya Meek ext. 253
B792 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
RES. #8239/96 - APPUCA nONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULA nON 158
Fill, Construction &. Alteration to Waterways
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the
Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be
constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a
Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or
on such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river,
creek, stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(7.4.1-7.4.5) which are listed below. ............................... CARRIED
(7.4.1) Cachet South Inc.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 16, Concession 3, (Woodbine and
16th Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to regrade within the Fill Regulated Area in order to accommodate an
approved industrial subdivision within the Town of Markham.
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13, 1999 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Cosbum Patterson Mather Umited; Project 95310: Drawing 801
dated July 1990; Drawings 201 and 1 dated October 1996; received January 17,
1997.
EXECUTIVE COWITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B793
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to regrade adjacent to a stream corridor within the Fill Regulated
Area. The works involve grading 8 3:1 slope at the edge of the stream corridor in order to
accommodate a proposed industrial lot entirely on tableland. The stream corridor, which is
currently utilized as a golf course, will not be impacted.
Control of Flooding:
The works are beyond the flood plain. There will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be erected between the proposed regrading and the adjacent stream
corridor.
Conservation of Land:
The area of grading will be privately owned and maintained. The applicant is proposing to
plant shrub material to return the area to current conditions.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in accordance with Section 4.1.1 - New Urban Development of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28391 Application I:009197IMARK
For information contact: Russel White, ext. 306
Date: 1997.01.28.
(7.4.2) Betty Ho
To place fill within 8 regulated area on Part Lot 8, Concession 2 EYS, (30 Country
Lane), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material for lot grading and landscaping, in conjunction with the
construction of a new residential dwelling, within the Fill Regulated Area of the Wilket
Creek.
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13, 1999 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by T .A.S. Enterpri..., Design eon....ltatnts: Drawing A 1; received
January 9, 1997.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
B794 EXECUTIVE COt&1ITTEEt13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
. .
Proposal:
The proposal consists of placing fill for site grading and landscaping purposes as part of the
construction of a new residential dwelling on this vacant lot. Only the northeastern half of
the property is situated within the Fill Regulated Area.
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located outside the Regional Storm flood plain of the Wilket Creek.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected as part of the proposed works; the construction site is 110
metres west of the watercourse.
Conservation of land:
All construction will be located on tableland, more than 10 metres from the previously
established physical top-of-bank of the stable and well-vegetated Wilket Creek valley
corridor. A small portion of the grading work at the east end of the proposed building will
marginally extend into the 10 metre setback area. The remainder of the 10 metre setback
zone will remain undisturbed. All filled and disturbed areas will be revegetated/stabilized
following construction.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(G) - Infilling of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28374 Application I:003197INY
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1997.01.20.
(7.4.3) Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto - Transportation Department
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 15 and 16, Concession 1 WYS,
(Sheppard Avenue), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake rehabilitation of the Sheppard Avenue bridge over the West
Don River valley.
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13, 1999 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1 ) Plans entitled -Bridge Rehabilitation - General Arrangement-; prepared by McCormick
Rankin Ltd.; Drawing S-498-1; dated January 1997.
(2) Letter of undertaking from R. Stofko, P. Eng., Project Manager for McCormick
Rankin; dated January 13, 1997.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 8795
ProDosal:
To rehabilitate the Sheppard Avenue Bridge over the West Don River valley. Construction
access and staging areas will be required within the valley and a temporary bridge will be
required over the existing West Don River channel.
Control of Flooding:
No grade changes are proposed within the Regional Storm flood plain.
Pollution:
Debris from removal of the bridge deck will be controlled by a combination of sediment
fencing and wooden planks placed beneath the work areas.
Conservation of Land:
No grade changes are proposed. There are no geotechnical issues associated with the
valley slopes. The proponent has undertaken to provide a vegetation inventory and
rehabilitation planting plan if the contractor requires access to the adjacent parkland.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposed works are in compliance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Policy, Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28383 Application I:7/97/NY
For information contact: Richard Uoyd, ext. 281
Date: 1997.01.16.
(7.4.4) Westside Cemeteries Ltd.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 22, Concession 2 WYS, (5830
Bathurst Street), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on
property owned by same and MTRCA.
The purpose is to place fill and undertake regrading in a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River
(West Branch) in order to facilitate the development of a proposed chapel and office building
.
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13, 1999 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Martin Frenette Architect; Drawing A 1; Revision 5; dated
January 23, 1997.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
B796 EXECUTIVE COM\1ITTEE 113196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
.
Proposal:
To place approximately 190 cubic metres of fill in a regulated area of the Don River (West
Branch) in order to facilitate the development of a proposed chapel and associated parking
facilities. This application represents the approval pursuant to Ontario Regulation 1 58
required as part of the transaction between the Authority and Westside Cemetaries
approved at Authority Meeting 111/96, (Resolution A246/96).
Control of Flooding:
In order to provide a suitable fire access route minor regrading is required within the
Regional Storm flood plain. Staff have reviewed the proposed fill volume (92 m3) and
confirm that it will not have a significant impact on the existing flood levels or flood storage
capacity in the G. Ross Lord reservoir.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be installed around the perimeter of the site in order to prevent
sedimentation on the adjacent Authority lands. Disturbed areas will be stabilized upon
completion of constrlAction.
Conservation of Land:
As part of the agreement for the land transfer and easement release, Westside Cemeteries
Ltd. will contribute funds for a landscape screening planting plan as well as regeneration
plantings on the G. Ross Lord reservoir lands. These plantinQs will be undertaken by
Metropolitan Toronto in consultation with Authority staff. Staff have reviewed the
condition of the valley slope north of the site and are satisfied that the development is
outside the long-term stable slope line.
Policv Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformance with the approved Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program, Section 4.2.2 H) - Existing Resource Based Uses. It represents the implementation
of the use approved as part of the sale and easement release approved by Resolution
A246/96.
CFN: 28380 Application I:004197INY
For information contact: Richard Uoyd, Ext. 281
Date: 1997.01.23.
(7.4.5) Ardorini Missionaries
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 17, 18 and 19, Registered Plan
M-1113, (200 Pine Grove Road - Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber
River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material for site grading and parking lot modifications in
conjunction with the conversion of the residential property to a place of worship, within the
Fill Regulated Area of the East Humber River.
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13, 1999 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B797
-.
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Khalil U. Syed, Architect; Job No. 95-04; Drawing A 1,
Revision 3 dated November 26, 1996; received January 22, 1997. (Total Plans 1).
(2) Drainage and Grading Plan; prepared by Qazi Municipal Engineering &. Computer
Modelling Ltd.; Drawing DG-1, Latest Revision dated November 24, 1996; received
January 22, 1997. (Total Plans 1)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of placing fill for site grading and modifications to the existing
driveway/parking area. An addition to the existing residential dwelling is proposed; the new
building will accommodate a church hall, chapel and eight bedroom units. Only the eastern
half of the property is situated within the Fill Regulated Area of the East Humber River.
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located outside the Regional Storm flood plain.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will encircle the area of grading, to impede any overland migration of sediment.
Conservation of Land:
All filled and disturbed areas will be stabilized/revegetated following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28393 Application I:011/97NAUG
For information contact: George Leja (ext. 342)
Date: 1997.01.30.
B798 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE...3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997
-..---.
RES. #8240/96 - APPUCA nONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULA nON 158 - ERRATA APPLlCA nONS
Moved by: Richard Whitehead
Seconded by: Brian Harrison
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(7.4.6 - 7.4.11) that had been scheduled on the &g.-de as errata items, for which all the
required information was received and finalized as listed below. . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
(7.4.6) Town of Markham
To alter a watercourse, south of Highway 17, east of Woodbine Ave., in the Town
of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by Town of
Markham.
The purpose is to construct a watercourse crossing of the Rouge River to extend Rodick
Road south from Highway #7.
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13, 1999.
1. Rodrick Road New Construction Plan; prepared by Cole Sherman; Project 7896;
Drawings 3. 5, 6 and S1; received February 12, 1997.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The Town of Markham is proposing to extend Rodick Road south from Highway 17 across
the Rouge valley. The alignment for the road runs south then west, crossing the valley and
watercourse at right angles. The valley floor opening under the bridge is approximately
40 m. Two piers are proposed. The watercourse will not be disturbed.
Control of Flooding:
The opening of the bridge provides for passage of the Regional Storm event with an
increase in flood elevation of 3 to 5 em. This increase is contained within the valley, on
lands owned by the Town, and is not measurable within 20 m of the structure. The
proposed portion of the road in the flood plain will be filled above the flood elevation.
Pollution:
The bridge is accessible from both sides of the watercourse and the watercourse will be
protected with sediment fencing. Sediment will be restricted from the watercourse.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B799
Conservation of Land:
The alignment for the road and bridge were agreed to through the Environmental
Assessment process and represent the area of least impact.
Where the bridge meets the valley wall on the west side there is some existing toe erosion.
Authority staff will be meeting with the consultant and the developer to the west to
examine this site and consider appropriate measures so that the bridge and adjacent
development will not be impacted. The disturbed area and riparian area will be restored
with woody vegetation.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28298 Application I:230/96/MARK
For information contact: Mary Aaselstine, ut. 304
Date: 1997.01.22.
(7.4.7) Gerald Sheff
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 33, Registered Plan 433, (105
Glen Road), in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to regrade to accomodate the replacement of an existing residence on the
subject property within the Fill Regulated Area.
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13, 1999.
1. Sheff Residence Landscape Treatment for Rear Garden. Plan; prepared by NAK
Design Group Landscape Architects; Drawing L 1.0; as received on February 12,
1997.
2. Sheff Residence Redline Revised Plans; prepared by Kuwabara Payne McKenna
Blumberg Architects; Drawings 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 6 and 7; .. received on December 19,
1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to conduct minor regrading in association wtih the demolition of an
existing residence and construct a new residence on the site. The new residence is on the
same footprint as the existing residence with the exception of a new basement entrance.
The building is less than 10 metres from the top-of-bank. In support of the new structure,
the applicant has submitted a geotechnical report which confirms that the slope will not be
impacted. Engineering staff have reviewed the geotechnical information and find it to be
satisfactory .
B8DD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 113196, FEBRUARY 14.1997
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be erected between the top-of-bank and the proposed works and will
remain in-place for the duration of the works.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no impact on the conservation of land as the footprint of the existing building
is being utilized.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in accordance with Section 4.2.1 - Redevelopment within Established
Communities of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28345 Application I:240/96/TOR
For Information contact: Russel White, Ext. 306
Date: 1997.01.13.
(7.4.8) Cathedral Bluffs Yacht Club
To place fill within a regulated area on 2975 Kingston Road (Cathedral Bluffs
Yacht Club), in the City of Scarborough, Waterfront Watershed as located on
property owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to regrade the lake bottom adjacent to a dock area to prevent damage to
boats.
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13, 1999.
1. Cathedral Bluffs Yacht Club Site Plan and Details; prepared by Carson Woods
Architects/Pl8l1ners; received February 12, 1997.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The Cathedral Bluffs Yacht Club is proposing to regrade the lake bottom adjacent to a dock
area to prevent damage to boats. The material is largely rubble and stone deposited during
construction of a retaining wall. The rubble will be moved from the slips and placed under
the dock structures.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no impact on flooding.
Pollution:
A floating silt curtain will be used to contain water borne sediments during the construction
phase.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.13I96, FEBRUARY 14,1997 8801
- -
Conservation of Land:
The area proposed to be disturbed is a very important nursery area for young fish. Moving
the material (as opposed to removal which was the original proposal) will maintain the
desirable habitat. The bays at Bluffers Park are currently being rehabilitated to enhance the
fisheries habitat. This proposal does not undermine the broader habitat enhancement
project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to section 5.4 - Policies and Criteria for MTRCA Valley and Stream
Corridor Regeneration Projects.
CFN: 28025 Application I: 111/96/SCAR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, Ext. 304
Date: 1997.01.21.
(7.4.9) Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto - Works Department
To construct in the flood plain and to alter a watercourse on Military Trail to
Centennial College, in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as
located on property owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to construct a maintenance road to access a sanitary trunk sewer..
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13, 1999.
1. East Highland Creek Proposed Acc... Road Between Military Trail and Centennial
College; prepared by metro Works Drawings #92-201-1 (revised), ..d 92-201-2
(revised); received February 3, 1997.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To facilitate the regular maintenance of the Region's sanitary trunk sewer in the Highland
Creek valley, Metro Works is proposing to upgrade an existing informal track to a 3 m wide
limestone screenings maintenance road. The road is proposed to have two ford crossings.
Control of Flooding:
Existing grades will not be changed, and the ford crossings will be imbedded at the existing
stream invert. The control of flooding will not be affected.
Pollution:
In order to control sediment, the in-stream works will be done as quickly as possible and
under low flow conditions. Disturbance in other areas will be minimised.
B802 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE .-t3l96, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
~ ...--. -
Conservation of Land:
Metro Parks and Culture has a long term plan to provide a trail through this reach of the
Highland Creek as part of the regional trail system. They are in agreement with the
alignment and support a multi-use objective for the road. The new road alignment will
generally follow the existing track except where it runs immediately parallel to the
watercourse. There is sufficient area to re-align the road through these areas without
affecting slopes or significant vegetation. The riparian areas that have been disturbed with
the existing track will be restored with woody vegetation.
The fords will consist of armourstone imbedded in the invert and riverrun stone to protect
the stream banks. These structures will provide for fish passage Because of the erosive
nature of the watercourse there are no ideal crossing sites for the fords. However, with
careful maintenance, these fords will provide opportunity to cross the watercourse until
bridges can be constructed when the trail system is developed. The in-stream works will be
done in compliance with the Ministry of Natural Resources timing guidelines for fisheries.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 4.3 Infrastructure and Servicing.
CFN: 28280 Application I:221/96/SCAR
For information contact: Mary Asselstine, Ext. 304
Date: 1997.01.21.
(7.4.10) City of Scarborough
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on 450
Scarborough Golf Club Road, in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek
Watershed as located on property owned by Masaryk Memorial Institute Inc..
The purpose is to undertake stream bank ersoion and slope restoration works in the
Highland Creek valley.
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13, 1999.
1. Masaryk Memorial Institute, Slope Bioengineering and Revegetation Plana; prepared
by Cumming Cockbum Ltd.; Drawings 7419-1 and 7419-2; received December 16,
1996.
2. Masaryk Memorial Institute, Watercourse Improvements Plana; prepared by Cumming
Cockbum Ltd.; Drawings 7419-3 and 7419-4; received January 27, 1997.
RATIONAlE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B803
. .
Proposal:
The City of Scarborough is negotiating a maintenance easement along the Highland Creek
on the Masaryk property. The reach is located in the middle of the Scarborough Golf and
Country Club where the City currently has an easement to maintain existing stream bank
protection for the watercourse. In order to complete the negotiations, the City has agreed
to undertake slope restoration and stream bank protection on the Masaryk property. These
works are the subject of this permit application.
The proposal includes the stabilisation of an eroding valley slope below the Masaryktown
development and the Scarborough Golf Club lands. At immediate risk is a chainlink fence
and some mature coniferous trees. In the future, a tee on the golf course lands and a day
care play area on the Masaryk lands may be affected.
The slope has been undercut and over-steepened in the past from erosion at the toe from
the Highland Creek. The toe has been stabilised with gabion mat and the erosion has been
arrested. Vegetation through the riparian area has reestablished, and there is evidence that
the slope is stabilising naturally with colonising vegetation. The very top of the slope
remains over-steepened and is actively sloughing.
The major work on the slope will involve grading back the top and planting it to stop the
sloughing problem. The middle steep portion of the slope will be left undisturbed and
allowed to continue to colonise naturally. Supplementary riparian planting of woody species
will occur at the bottom of the slope.
The existing gabion mat erosion protection at the toe of the slope is beginning to
deteriorate. If it is allowed to fail, the slope will again be at risk from undercutting. The
proposal includes augmenting and repairing the existing gabion mat protection as well as
incorporating natural channel design principles to mitigate erosion forces through this reach.
The instream works include the installation of a vortex weir, and regrading of an inside bend
of the stream bank on the opposite side of the gabion mat work.
There is an additional proposal to undertake some stream bank protection at the
downstream end of the reach where an existing armourstone wall and gabion mat are not
adequately meshed and local erosion is occurring. This work will include construction of a
crib wall, and installation of armourstone to complete the protection of the bank.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not impact on the characteristics of flooding through this reach.
Pollution:
To the extent possible, machinery will stay out of the watercourse. However, because of
the heavy vegetation and steep valley walls some of the work will have to be done with
equipment sitting in the watercourse. In order to mitigate impacts, the work will be done as
quickly as possible and at low flows. The tender documents specify that sediment controls
and dewatering undertaken on the site must be satisfactory to MTRCA staff.
B804 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14.1997
Conservation of Land:
The works proposed will stabilise the slope to the satisfaction of the representatives of the
Masaryk lands. Access areas and construction areas will be restored with native woody
riparian vegetation.
Policv Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 3.2.1 (D) - Policies and Procedures for Establishing Corridor
Boundaries and Alterations.
CFN: 26724 Application I:269/94/SCAR
For information contact: Mary AsseIstine, Ext. 304
Date: 1997.01.20.
(7.4.11) Whitevale Golf Club
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 24, Concession 4, (2985 Golf Club Road),
in the Town of Pickering, Duffin Creek Watershed as located on property owned
by Ontario Land Corporation.
The purpose is to redesign the inlet for the golf club's water-taking by constructing a wet
well on the site within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood plain.
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13,1999.
1. Letter of Undertaking from Art Oswald, Golf Course Superintendent of Whitevale
Golf Club, dated January 24, 1997, regarding sediment control. and species
rehabiUtation, received January 27, 1997.
2. Whitevale Golf Club Location Detail. Plan. Site Plan, Cro..-aection Detail Plan;
Drawing. 1, 2 ..d 3; as received on December 23. 1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to construct a wet well within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional
Storm flood plain of the Duffin Creek. The wet well installation consists of the placement
of a culvert below baseflow on the creek. The culvert will be attached to a well proposed
adjacent to the watercourse. Water will be pumped from the well rather than directly from
the watercourse. The wet well will provide water to the existing golf course facility in the
same amount currently taken, in accordance with a water taking permit received from the
Ministry of Environment and Energy.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
All in stream works will be conducted within a 24 hour period to limit impacts on the
adjacent watercourse. Machinery will not enter the watercourse.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE'" 3196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B805
Conservation of Land:
The works are being conducted at the location of the golf club's existing water intake
system. The area disturbed during construction will be rehabilitated in accordance with
details submitted by the applicant.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in accordance with Section 4.2.2 - New Resource Based Uses of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 28368 Application I:243/96/PICK
For information contact: Russel White, Ext. 306
Date: 1997.01.27.
RES. #8241/96 - APPLICATIONS FOR A PERMIT PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT. permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application
(7.4.12) Save the Rouge Valley System which i. listed below .............. CARRIED
(7.4.12) Save the Rouge Valley System
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 28, Concession 7, (west of Highway 48, south
of 19th Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on
property owned by Harvey Brown.
The purpose is to modify a dam structure that represents a fish barrier.
The permit will be issued from February 14, 1997 to February 13, 1999 in accordance with
the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Concept Plan and Cross-section for Removal of Dam Stop Log and Creation of
Downstream Pools and Riffles, Brown Dam; prepared by Harrington and Hoyle Ltd.;
received January 22, 1997. (Total 2 Plans).
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Prooosal:
Save the Rouge Valley System is sponsoring several restoration projects on the little Rouge
River to be implemented over the next two years, collectively known as the Little Rouge
Project. The first of these projects involves changes to a dam structure to allow for
passage of large species of fish such as trout.
B806 EXECUTIVE COM\1ITTEE 113196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
One stop log is to be removed from the existing dam, and a series of stone and log steps
built downstream to achieve the step pool configuration required for fish movement. In
addition, river run stone will be placed downstream of these works to improve the
substrate. Upstream of the existing dam is a pond and wetland. The wetland is to be
preserved by maintaining the water and sediment level with the use of fascines.
The site will be monitored over the next few years to note the success for the passage of
trout and the impact on the wetland. An additional stop log may be removed in the future
to further enhance the fish passage. Details on the features and functions of the wetland
will be assessed if this option is considered.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no impact on flood flows.
Pollution:
Some sediment will go downstream as a result of the removal of the stop log and
installation of the fascines. However, the majority of the in stream work will be done on the
concrete spillway of the dam and will not result is disturbance to the stream bed. Release
of sediment prior to March 31 in a controlled manner will have minimal impact on aquatic
habitat.
Conservation of Land:
Riparian vegetation will be planted adjacent to the stream bank downstream of the dam.
The work will result in the enhancement of fish habitat in the Little Rouge River.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program as it relates to Section 5.4 B2 - Corridor Rehabilitation Projects.
CFN: 28448 Application I:023/97/MARK
For information contact: Mary Asaelstine, Ext. 304
Date: 1997.02.10.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B807
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
RES. #8242/96
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Richard Whitehead
THAT 1M Convnittee move Into dosed session to discuI. the Project for the Acquisition of
the Former Ministry of Natural Resources Maple District Office and Landa and the
Restructuring of The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
ARISE FROM COMMITTE OF THE WHOLE
RES. #8243/96
Moved by: Enrico Pistritto
Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT the Committee arise from dosed session and that the recommendations discussed in
cI~ ""011 be ratified. ....................................... CARRIED
NEW BUSINESS
RES. #8244/96 - AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES ACT
AND REGULATIONS AS A RESULT OF THE PROVINCIAL -RED
TAPE REVIEW-.
Recently, staff has received information on the proposed changes to the
Conservation Authorities Act and our Regulations, as a result of the
recommendations from the Provincial Red Tape Review exercise. Staff
has concerns about the impacts of the changes and are bringing these
concerns to the Executive Committee for information.
Moved by Lois Griffin
Seconded by: Enrico Pistritto
THAT the report from the Chief Administrative Officer, dated February 12, 1997, regarding
the proposed amendments to the Conservation Authorities Act and Regulations, be received
for information;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to work with The Association of Conservetion
Authorities of Ontario in bringing these concerns to the attention of the Province of Ontario
and to work with the province in recommending changes to the proposed amendments. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CARRIED
B8G8 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE'" 3196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
BACKGROUND
Staff has recently received details on the proposed amendments to the Conservation
Authorities Act and our Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation. Our
initial review has raised concern about the implications of the changes, related to our ability
to continue to use our Regulation to control activities that affect our valleys, shorelines,
wetlands and streams.
We also believe that the proposed changes do not meet the government's objectives of
streamlining or eliminating duplication. In fact, these changes could further complicate the
existing system.
We have been advised by The Association of Conservation Authorities of Ontario (ACAO),
that Mr. Sheehan, the Chair of the Red Tape Review Committee, has indicated his
committee did not intend to reduce our ability to regulate. Their prime objective was to
eliminate duplication therefore, he welcomes our input.
Authority staff, in conjunction with the ACAO, will be working on suggested changes to the
proposed amendments. I will provide updated information arising from this process as it
progresses.
A copy of a recent press release from the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), is attached
for your information. This document identifies some of the changes to the various Acts
administered by MNR. The more detailed wording changes are provided in a separate
document which can be made available, if requested.
Report prepared by:
Craig Mather, Ext. 240
EXecUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 8809
iR News
January 2:!, 199i
MN'R Introduces Red Tape Cbanges
Natural Resources ~limster Chris Hodgson today proposed changes to
reduce Red Tape that will protect more than SII million annually for
forest renewal and Improve :l number of planning regulations.
"MNR's proposed red tape changes will ensure that SII million in forest
renewal money continues to be dedic:lted to our forests," said ~{r,
Hodgson. "Another key red rape change will improve MNR's planning
on Crown land. We will maint::un our :lbility to manage natur:1l
resources sustainably,"
MNR will protect forest rene'sal funds by :lmending the Crown Forest
Susuinabiliry Act to cl:lrify ,h:lt funds dedic:lted by the forest mdustry to
the provincial Forest Rene.....al Trust fund :lre Crown assets for forest
renewal. This amendment avOIds the nsk of these funds being subject to
federal ra;'(ation. All the :noney In the renewal trust fund \~ill be
available for forest renewal. ThiS IS consistent with the anginal intent of
the Crown Forest SustaInabiliry Act.
"~INR's Red Tape changes \\ill affect 1 i pieces of:egislation :lnd
eliminate unnecessary regulations. The changes are part of the
government's commlttnent to reduce the costs of government while
improving public servIces," ~{r. Hodgson said.
Changes to the Public lmds .\ct \~illlmprove MNR's land-use planning
process for Crown land. ~[NK will set de:lr rules for appropriate,
environmentally sensitive development and gtve industries working on
Crown land more certaInty about making business decisions.
Changes to Ontario Parks legislation \..ill increase the ma.'<imwn fine for
damaging park natural and cultural heritage and other offences to
S25,OOO, from S5,000, Changes ....ill also allow!vlNR to enforce
clean-up and repair orders.
Lakes and RIvers Improvement Act changes emphasize public safety,
incre:lSe the level of fines, streamline the approval process for
construction and repair of dams, and add the ability to issue a stop-work
order consistent with protecting public health and safety,
MNR will stre:lmline forestry legislation by reducing II Acts to five and
by repe:lling outd:lted legislation. Key elements of five Acts will be
02.' 10/97 22: 19'~n
B810 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
.-
consofilfuted Into a proposed new Forestry Act that will cover MNR's
commitment to :lSsisnng rorestry on private land. To help protect
valuable pnvate torests. tines are bemg incre:lSed for improper cutting
ofrrees.
Changes to the Forest Fires Prevention Act remove red tape from
declaring RestrIcted Fire Zones during senous penods of forest fires.
Restricted Fire Zones are a tool ~fNR uses to help protect public safety
during forest fire emergencies.
MNR proposes changes to the Conservation Authorities (CA) Act to
follow up on the province's e:lrlier introduction of changes that cle:lI'ly
identify flood control and the protection of provincially sigmficant
conservation lands :lS the provincial interest in CA maner.>. Participating
municipalities \..ill de:ermine the other work of CAs, New changes to
the CA Act remove the province from unnecessary intrusion into local
deciSIon-making.
Changes in surveying legislation \..i!l transfer the responsibility for
developing standards tor monumemanon to the Associanon of Ontario
Land Surveyor.>. Wh05~ members have the expemse :md experience to
admiruster the ac:n;iry Changes to the ~[imng Ac: \..i!l allow tor the
consolilfutlon of thre~ regul:ltions covering the disposition of
Crown-owned oil :md gas lOto one regulation.
MNR will pOSt a!ltts proposed Red Tape amendments on the
Environmental Bill of~ghts (EBR) registry for 45lfuys for public
review :md comment. The names of people to COntact are included \..ith
each posted amendment. ~INR will consider comments it receives
before finalizing proposed amendments,
Please also check the fact sheet:
Backlrround [nfonnanon on ~[NR's Red Tane Changes
FOR ~IORE INFOR\l-\TION:
Brian Blomrne
Communications Services Branch
TORONTO (416) 314-2095
Rob Messervey
Project Manager, ~R Red Tape R~view
TORONTO (416i 314-1934
02.' 1 0'97 22:20' 2~
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B811
-. -
"News
January 1997
Background Iofonoarion on )INR's Red Tape Changes
The Ministry ofNarural Resources has proposed changes to reduce Red
Tape in forestry and forest fire legislation, the Conservation Authorities
Act, the Public Lands Act, the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act,
provinCial park legislanon and, surveying legislation.
Many of the changes will improve the delivery of government services;
others update aspects of legislation, consolidate a number of Acts into
simpler, more-focused legislation and remove unnecessary regulation. In
some cases, MNR used Red Tape changes as an oppommity to improve
government by strengthening fines and the ability to control aCTIvities
related to natural resources management. The changes will also cre:lte
new OppOrtUnities for business and Industry Involved In resource
management :lcnvities,
MNR will maintain Its ability to manage natur:ll resources sustainably,
This fact sheet outlines the intent of the changes to various pieces of
legislatIon,
Crown Forest Sustainability Act (CFSA):
MNR will add a clause to the CFSA to resolve tl.'( issues between the
forest industry in Ontario and the federal government. The change will
clarify that funds dedic:lted by the forest industry to the pro,;incial Forest
Renewal Trust Fund are Crown assets for forest renewal. thiS
amendment protects forest renewal funds by clarifying that funds
dedicated by the forest industry to the provincial Forest Renewal Trust
Fund are Crown assets for forest renewal. This will avoid the risk of
these funds being subject to taxation.
All the money in the renewal trUSt fund will be available for forest
renewal. This is consistent with the origlnal intent of the Crown Forest
Susminability Act.
Forestry legislation:
MNR will reduce the number of Acts related to forestry to 5 from 11,
MNR will consolidate key elements of five Acts mto a proposed new
Forestry Act which will:
02110/97 :2:23,36
B812 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
. .
= incorpomte pans of the W oodl:mds Improvement Act (WIA)
covering ~1NR's commItment to assisting forestry on private land.
MNR will repe:11 the \VIA
= Include partS of the Trees Act that authorize municipal
governments to enact bylaws that cover what c:m be done with
trees In a mwricipality, MNR will repeal the Trees Act
= increase fines for improper cUtting of trees to help protect
important forest resources on private land and increase other fines
= include partS of the Forest Tree Pest Control Act to provide
authority for de:1ling with serious insect infestations on Crown or
private land. MNR will repeal the Pest Control Act
,
MNR wiIl also repe:1l the Spruce Pulpwood Exportation Act and the
Settler's Pulpwood Protection Act because the CFSA covers these Acts
and will repe:1l the Forestry Workers Employment Act because current
labor legislation addresses this Act.
Forest Fires Prevention Act:
Changes remove Red Taoe t'rom declaring Restricted Fires Zones dunn!!
seno':;;; periods of forest fires. Restric:ed Fire Zones are a tool y[NR -
uses to help protect public safety during forest fire emergencies,
Public Lands Act:
Ch:mges clarify ~1NR's ability to conduct land use planning. The
miniStry will improve its land use planning process. set cle:1f rules for
appropnate. environmentally sensitive development and give industries
workmg on Crown land more certainty about making business decisions,
Other changes:
= shonen the time to sell a piece of CroYm land larger than five
hectares making the time frame consistent with the treatment of
small lots
= simplify the sale of waterlots under the Act
C simplify the process for transferring administrative control of
public land to other provincial ministries, to CroYm agencies or to
the fedeml government
= establish the province's ability to remove conditions on patents
that restrict the right of landowners to develop natural resources
on :''leir land
= allow l'v1NR to develop m:magement agreements to use public
land with government and non-government org:mizations
= simplify the sening of fees for using public land
02lW'97 22:24::;9
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997 B813
~-
Ontario Parks legislation:
Changes increase the ma."<lmum fine for damagtng park natural :md
cultural heriuge and other offences to 525,000, from 55,000. consistent
with fines by other agencIes.
Other changes:
Callow MNR to enforce clean-up and repair orders
C define the authority of Park Wardens
C simplify and consolidate regulations covering activities to parks
Lakes and Rive~ Improvement Act:
Some changes emphasize public safety and incre:l.Se the level of fines,
Other changes:
= stre:unline the approval process for construcnon and repair of
dams
= add the ability to issue :l stop-work order consistent wnh
protectmg pubiic health :md safety :md wIth protecting natur:ll
resources
= allow the development of management agreements
= repeal sections of the .\ct that relate to log drives ( using lakes :md
rivers to move timber), because the actiVity has not been
undertaken for years
= use the municipal tax system to collect debts from private
landowners to reimburse ~ for work It does to deal with
unsafe structures around water that pose a public risk
Conservation Authorities (CA) Act:
Changes will follow up on the province's earlier introduction of changes
that clearly identify flood control and protection of provincially
signific:mt conservation lands as the provincial interest in CA matters.
The latest changes:
C will clarify the CA role in hazard management consistent with the
provincial interest in provincial policy statements,
= will revise regulations on fill and construction to focus on
important wetlands, shorelines and other natur:ll hazard areas
= will stre:unline approval ofCA regulations
0:"10/97 ::::~'UII
B814 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14, 1997
.-
= will provide municip:1lines in a CA watershed with at le:lSt 30
days notice of proposed budgets :md levies
= will remove the provmce from Involvement In CA business that is
not related to the provmci:1l interest. 11us includes grOUpIng
municlpalities for appoinonent of members to a CA, enlargmg a
CA. amalgamanng CAs. :md a number of housekeeping changes,
Surveying legislation:
Complement:lIy changes to the Surveys Act and the Surveyors Act will
transfer the responsibility for developing standards for monumentation
to the self-governing Associanon ofOnt:1rio L~d Surveyors, whose
members have the expertise and experience to admmister these
standards. Any proposals made by the association require government
approval before implementation. Monumentation refers to physical
reference points placed during the surveying of land.
Mining .-\ct:
Changes will allow for ,he consolidation of three re;;ul:lt1ons co\ermg
the disposinon of Crown-vwned oil and gas IntO one re",'U.!atton.
Public Review of ~t:'t"'R's proposed red tape changes:
MNR will post all its proposed Red Tape amendments on the
Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR) registry for ~5 days for public
review :md comment, Tne names of people to contact are included with
each posted amendment. MNR will consider comments it receives
before finalizing proposed amendments,
----_.._~.__._-------_.._. .-..----.--
Back to NEWS Menu
Back to MAIN Menu
Modified 5-Feb.97
eel Oueen's Printer for Ontario 199;
02'10/97 ~~,~9'4~
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "'3196, FEBRUARY 14,1997 B815
.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 2:35 p.m., February 14, 1997.
Richard O'Brien J. Craig Mather
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
Ipl