HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Use Advisory Board 1998
~
'THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #1/98
February 19, 1998
Due to lack of quorum there was no meeting held.
~
, THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98
August 21, 1998 E1
The Public Use Advisory Board met in the South Theatre, in the Visitor's Centre at Black Creek
Pioneer Village on August 21, 1998. The Chair, Donna Patterson, called the meeting to order at
10:11 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri .......................................................... Vice Chair
Michael DiBiase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Doug Dickerson ........................................................... Member
Donna Patterson ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair
REGRETS
John Adams .............................................................. Member
Bas Balkissoon ............................................................ Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Paul Palleschi ............................................................. Member
RES.#E1/98 - MINUTES
Moved by: Doug Dickerson
Seconded by: Maria Augimeri
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #5/97, held on January 9,1998 be received. . . . . . CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#E2/98 - THE ROUTE OF THE mANS CANADA TRAIL THROUGH THE GREATER
TORONTO AREA
Facilitation by the Authority. The Authority is in receipt of a request to
facilitate the coordination and confirmation of the preferred route of the Trans
Canada Trail through the Greater Toronto Area from the City of Mississauga
to the Township of Uxbridge.
Moved by: Doug Dickerson
Seconded by: Michael Di Biase
E2 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 August 21, 1998
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the staff report regarding the
facilitation, coordination and confirmation of the preferred route of the Trans Canada Trail
through the Greater Toronto Area from the City of Mississauga to the Township of Uxbridge
be received for information;
THAT staff establish a committee including municipalities, agencies, trail groups, Credit Valley
Conservation Authority, Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority and members of the
Greater Toronto Area Link Trans Canada Trail Working Group to facilitate, coordinate and
confinn the preferred route of the Trans Canada Trail through the Greater Toronto Area from
the City of Mississauga to the Township of Uxbridge;
AND FURTHER THAT a letter be forwarded to Bryan Howard, Program Manager, Ontario Trails
Council to confirm the Authority's willingness to act in a coordinating role. . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The idea of building the Trans Canada Trail (lCT), began in 1992 as a legacy project included in the
celebrations of the Canada 125 Corporation. This group envisaged a national shared-use recreation
trail being built as a year 2000 millennium project. When completed it would be the longest trail of
its kind in the world, with a length of approximately 15,000 kilometres from sea to sea. The Prime
Minister of Canada, the Right Honourable Jean Chretien, has since announced that the Trans
Canada Trail is an officially recognized millennium project.
The TCT is being promoted and coordinated by the Trans Canada Trail Foundation, an independent
registered charity. The TCT Foundation has identified a provincial trail council in each province and
territory that will be responsible for getting the trail built. The Ontario Trails Council (OTC) , through
an agreement signed 'in 1997 with the Foundation, is the organization responsible for the Ontario
route of the TCT.
The OTC unveiled the conceptual route for the TCT in the Southern Ontario section in 1995. I n both
southeastern and southwestern Ontario, the proposed route follows a series of abandoned rail
corridors. East of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) the proposed trail route will follow abandoned
railways from Peterborough to Lindsay and terminate in the Village of Uxbridge on the Oak Ridges
Moraine in Durham Region. West of the GT A the trail route was accepted in 1993 as following the
Caledon Trailway which stretches north to Highway 9 across the Humber River watershed in Peel
Region.
. The original 1995 concept involved the utilization of the Oak Ridges Moraine as the trail route across
the GTA, however a linked trail route across the Oak Ridges Moraine has yet to be identified due to
various issues. In the past several months there has been considerable pressure and support to
develop a "GTA Linkage" for the TCT which would bring the trail to the doorsteps of 3.5 million
residents of the GTA.
Neither the TCT Foundation or the OTC will own or operate any of the existing or proposed trails
identified as the preferred route of the TCT. The planning, implementation and maintenance of the
trails identified as the preferred route of the TCT are the responsibility of the local trail building
organization such as a municipality, conservation authority, or trail group. Certain aspects of the long
term planning such as ensuring a linked trail across Canada, financing and marketing are the
responsibility of the TCT Foundation.
August 21, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 E3
I n recent years there have been many studies and partnerships developed for the planning and
implementation of shared-use trails in the GT A. A number of trails in the GT A exist in various stages
of development, however none are considered completed at this point. Existing trails include:
. The Lake Ontario Waterfront Trail;
. The Oak Ridges Moraine Trail;
. The Caledon TrailwayfTrans Canada Trail;
. The Uxbridge/Lindsay/Peterborough Railtrail; and
. Sections of trails in the river valleys within the Authority's jurisdiction.
RATIONALE
Recently the Authority was approached by the Ontario Trails Council with a request that it playa
coordinating role in facilitating the establishment of a preferred route for the Trans Canada Trail
through the GT A. The Authority has a history of work in this area, including the development and
approval of The Program for the Establishment of the Greater Toronto Region Trail System in 1992.
Staff feel that the Authority has the interregional jurisdiction and the expertise to take on this role,
and in addition, owns much of the land on which a trail might be located. The municipalities within
the Authority's area of jurisdiction all have trail plans and staff work closely with their municipal
counterparts to prepare and implement these plans. Based on this, a favourable response to the
OTC request is recommended.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
There are no funds identified to directly support this project. It is anticipated however, that the costs
involved in coordinating the trail route would be minimal. There is a need to confirm funding from
local trail groups, municipal partners, The Trans Canada Trail Foundation and The Millennium
Bureau of Canada for actual implementation of the project.
Report prepared by: Greg Rich, extension 263
For information contact: Andy Wickens, extension 252
Greg Rich, extension 263
Date: 1998.08.05
RES.#E3/98 . ALCOHOL BAN AT INDIAN LINE AND ALBION HILL CAMPGROUNDS
Labour Day and Victoria Day Weekends. Implementation of a ban on the
consumption of alcohol at the Indian Line and Albion Hills Campgrounds for
the Labour Day and Victoria Day Weekends, commencing in September of
1998.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Doug Dickerson
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the consumption of alcohol at the
Albion Hills and Indian Line Campgrounds be designated as a prohibited activity under The
Trespass to Property Act;
E4 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 August 21, 1998
THAT this designation be applied at the discretion of Authority staff;
THAT a ban on the consumption be put in place for the Labour Day Weekend, 1998 from
midnight Thursday to midnight Monday as a pilot initiative;
THAT staff explore the use of a Regulation made under The Uquor Ucence Act or an
amendment to the Authority's Conservation Areas Regulation to allow for a ban on the
consumption of alcohol at Authority campgrounds;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Board at a future date regarding the impact of
the alcohol ban . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Historically, the Authority's campgrounds at Indian Une and Albion Hills have experienced problems
with unruly behaviour by visitors. Incidents have included dangerous driving, thefts, domestic
violence and fights between patrons. There have also been incidents where Authority staff were
threatened and exposed to the potential for physical harm.
While incidents have occurred from time to time throughout the camping season, a majority of
problems have occurred during the Victoria Day and Labour Day long weekends, Aside from the
obvious issues of protecting both staff and visitors from physical harm, comments and complaints
received from visitors would suggest that the prevalence of unruly behaviour at the campgrounds
has driven away the type of clientele the Authority wishes to attract.
Staff are of the opinion that most of the problems with inappropriate behaviour at the campgrounds
have been associated with excessive consumption of alcohol. A number of initiatives have been
tried over the years to curb this problem, including strict enforcement of The Liquor Licence Act, the
use of paid duty police officers, restriction of visitors to campsites, regular patrols and the issuing
of tickets by staff qualified to do so. Unfortunately, these measures have proven ineffective,
particularly on the long weekends noted above.
RATIONALE
Staff feel that more radical measures than those used in the past are needed to resolve the problems
which are occurring at Authority campgrounds, and are therefore proposing a ban on alcohol
consumption during the Victoria Day and Labour Day weekends. This would eliminate some of the
root causes for the inappropriate behaviours encountered and would serve to make the
campgrounds less attractive for many of the campers who have created problems in the past.
Similar bans have been pursued with some success at Provincial Parks, and at other Authorities,
The Authority's Conservation Areas Regulations (Ontario Regulation 119) do not currently address
the issue of alcohol use"on-Aothority1ands. "We nave,;n the-past TeHed on the provisions of The
Liquor Licence Act and The Trespass to Property Act in managing the use of alcohol at our public
facilities. Only a limited number of Authority staff are qualified to enforce The Liquor Licence Act
directly. A much larger number of staff however, are Provincial Offences Officers and are qualified
to enforce The Trespass to Property Act. In order for an alcohol ban to be put into effect under this
legislation the consumption of alcohol must be declared a prohibited activity by the Authority. The
recommendation contained in this report gives effect to such a prohibition.
August 21, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 E5
Staff have consulted the Authority's solicitors regarding the enforceability of an alcohol ban at
Authority Campgrounds. It is their opinion that, while it is possible to enforce a ban on alcohol
consumption under The Trespass to Property Act, the preferred route would be to use either the
Authority's own Regulation 119, or to have a regulation enacted under The Liquor Licence Act as
has been done by The Niagara Parks Commission, and the Halton Region Conservation Authority
in the past. The legislative changes required to do this would require some time. Staff therefore,
are proposing that we use the Trespass to Property Act to allow us to enforce a ban on a pilot basis
over the 1998 Labour Day weekend. If the pilot achieves the desired results, we would then pursue
the other avenues proposed by our solicitors for the 1999 season.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Staff are of the opinion that a ban on alcohol consumption at the Authority's Campgrounds will
reduce visitation in the short run. This will cause some lost revenue during 1998. Typical revenues
for Labour Day weekend at both locations total about $40,000, and it is not unreasonable to assume
that the alcohol ban might reduce attendance by 25%. Despite this short term loss, staff feel that,
if we can gain control of current problems, we will begin to attract a more desirable clientele and will,
in the long term increase visitation while reducing security costs.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
It is important that campers be informed as to the implementation of an alcohol ban, A
comprehensive information program to publicize this measure is planned. Individuals reserving for
Labour Day have already been informed that an alcohol ban may be a possibility and staff will ensure
that ~nyone registering at the two sites is well aware of the situation.
Staff will monitor the results of the program this fall and will report back to the Board with a
recommendation for ttie future of the initiative.
For information contact: Andy Wickens, extension 252
Date: 1998,08.05
RES.#E4/98 - SECORD FOREST AND WILDLIFE AREA
Interim Management Plan. Approval of the Interim Management Plan for the
Secord Forest and Wildlife Area to accommodate and control public use and
ensure sound management of the property while longer term plans are being
developed.
Moved by: Doug Dickerson
Seconded by: - Maria Augimeri
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Interim Management Plan for the
Secord Forest and Wildlife Area be approved;
AND FURTHER THAT the plan be circulated to the Township of Uxbridge, the Region of
Durham, neighbouring residents, and interested groups for their information. . . ..CARRIED
E6 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 August 21, 1998
BACKGROUND
In January of 1998, the Authority approved Resolution #A325/97:
'7HAT staff be directed to proceed with the development of an Interim Management Plan for
the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area;
AND FURTHER THAT staff bring this plan back to the Authority for approval and provide
opportunities for public information regarding the Interim Management Plan. "
A draft plan is now complete and is being submitted by staff for approval. The Secord Forest and
Wildlife Area Interim Management Plan outlines polices and guidelines for both public use and
resource management on the property. These will serve to clarify the management of the Secord
lands pending development of longer term plans.
ADDITIONAL WORK TO BE DONE
It is important that the public, interest groups and interested governments and agencies understand
how the Authority is managing the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area, and the rationale behind the
policies and guidelines in place. Consequently, staff will distribute the Interim Management Plan
widely, once it has been approved. This distribution will provide a basis for the long term planning
process which will be widely consultative.
Work on the background information required to develop longer term plans for public use and
environmental management of the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area continues. This activity includes
detailed environmental inventories and the investigation of opportunities to provide public uses
which make use of the unique resources of the property. Once the background information phase
has been completed, an extensive public consultation process will be undertaken with a view to
developing the final plan.
For information contact: Andy Wickens, extension 252
Date: 1998.08.06
Attachment (10)
- - ---
August 21, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 E7
Attachment 1
Secord Forest and Wildlife Area
Interim Management Plan
July 31, 1998
DRAFT
E8 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 August 21, 1998
Attachment 2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority acquired the 230 acre Secord Forest and Wildlife
Area in 1997. Authority staff are in the process of developing a long term comprehensive plan for
the site, however it is felt that this will take some time to complete. In the meantime, it is important
to develop an Interim Management Plan for the Secord property.
Issues which will be addressed in the plan will include: immediate uses for the four residential
buildings on the property, and the barn; maintenance of the Secord Pond and the surrounding
property; location of the Oak Ridges Trail; restriction of public access to sensitive parts of the
property; control of activities such as hunting, fishing, snowmobiling and use of off road vehicles;
and interim management of the Pet Cemetery located at the site.
The Interim Management Plan is intended to allow for management of the Secord property until the
long term plan is completed and implemented. Work is underway to complete the environmental
management component of the final plan, and this information will be used to adjust the interim
management plan as required. It is the hope that the final comprehensive plan will be completed
in 1999.
2.0 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
2.1 Goals
The goals for the Secord Interim Management Plan are:
1. To protect and maintain the natural ecosystems and other resources of the Secord Forest
and Wildlife Area to ensure the health and diversity of its native species, habitats, ecological
processes and cultural resources.
2. To allow for public access to the property for uses and activities consistent with the goal of
protecting and maintaining natural ecosystems and cultural resources,
3. To meet the requirements of the Conservation Agreement between the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority and Ingeborg Secord,
. 4. To manage the property in the most cost effective manner.
2.2 Objectives
The Secord Interim Management Plan will seek to fulfill the following objectives:
1. To protect the natural and cultural resources of the property from deleterious human activity.
2. To maintain the property to provide for natural ecological processes and ecosystem
succession.
3. To protect, maintain and enhance the diversity and health of fish, wildlife. and plant
communities on the Secord lands.
August 21, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 E9
Attachment 3
4. To manage the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area so as to benefit the community and the
residents of the Greater Toronto Area.
5. To maintain the property to provide for safe and enjoyable public access.
6. To promote appropriate recreational use of the property, consistent with the other goals and
objectives of the Interim Management Plan.
7. To allow for educational use of the property and scientific research related to the Secord
Forest and Wildlife Area, consistent with the other goal and objectives of the Interim
Management Plan,
8. To maintain and enhance partnerships between the Authority and the surrounding
community, local groups and municipalities.
9. To allow for the recovery of maintenance and management costs through leases and
agreements for short term use of the property.
3.0 THE SITE
3.1 Site Description
The Secord Forest and Wildlife Area is comprised of 230 acres of ecologically significant land,
located in the headwaters of Duffins Creek, in the Township of Uxbridge (see Figure 1). It includes
parts of Lots 9, 10 and 11, Concession 3, and is situated east of Concession Line 3, north of Side
Road 5, The property includes four residences and a barn, a pet cemetery, three ponds, and a mix
of wooded areas, wetlands and open fields. The largest pond, is a dominant feature on the property
and is maintained by a dam at the pond outlet.
Historically, a small trout hatchery was operated on site, and some of the hatchery equipment
remains on the property. There are numerous informal trails throughout the property and, at present
the Oak Ridges Trail runs through the property on an unopened road allowance.
In general, a large portion of the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area, other than the lands immediately
surrounding the residences, is low lying and wet for much of the year. Typical vegetation,
dominated by Eastern White Cedar (Thuja occidentalis) is found in the low-lying areas. Much of the
upland areas have been reforested in the past.
3.2 History
The Secord property was acquired by 'Or. Secord in '"1"948 fromlhe estate of Henry White. The lands
were originally granted to the children of United Empire Loyalists in 1807 and had a number of
owners during the nineteenth century. Mr. White operated a mill on the property through to the
1940's
E10 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 August 21, 1998
Attachment 4 Figure 1
~~ I:
11 1
~~ <:- . ::I I
~= ~ g g .~ '~:li .i
-<
. - I
~~ ;j",:= "3.g~;::'ti:
j~ u "o::J U = '_' j U I
_=__ JC >~
" :>.-.51:i li 8 .. - ~
:>.:>.a:; Ct,l...a:o
~ ~g c Ilqil..1
c ~~ z. ~ i
0 ~ ~
C '. f
.- .. ~ .
~ z.. . Q
.- - ::l: 10 8
"'0 ! -~:r=- !
c u :'S! .. s'O '.. !'
~ cO; a:..S;g-=lJ
0 ;; .~ 11 ~ ~.; IS '" I
o ...=t,lC... i
U I
01)
C
.-
~
~
.-
~
~
I
~
d)
~ - .
~
~
.-
-
""0
-
.-
~
""0
t:
~
~
~
d)
~
0
~
""0
~
0 --
Co) - --- -
d)
t;Ij -
Ie..
1<(
I:E
-- 1>-
:w
- ::.:::
August 21. 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 E 11
Attachment 5
The cabin adjacent to the pond dates from the 1940's and was used as a vacation home. The larger
main house was built in 1965. During the Secord's tenure on the property, numerOl.jS environmental
improvements including extensive reforestation and the establishment of a trail network were carried
out. The lands were acquired by the Authority in 1997 from Ingeborg Secord and the estate of Allan
Secord. A conservation easement was included as part of the sale agreement and is registered on
title.
3.3 Current Land Uses
Since assumption of the lands by the Authority, the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area has been open
for public access on a limited basis. This access has been primarily restricted to hiking on the
property .
Over the past year, Authority staff have continued to maintain the pet cemetery, and members of the
public have continued to visit the cemetery on an occasional basis. Maintenance activities to this
point have been limited to grass cutting. One request for a burial at the cemetery has been received
and was granted. Discussions continue with a number of groups interested in restoration of the
structure.
The Farmhouse at the north end of the property remains vacant, although several groups have
expressed an interest in using this building on a short, or longer term basis. Authority staff have
exami.ned the structure and feel that extensive repairs and renovations are needed to make the
house habitable. .
The barn is currently unused. Staff have investigated, in a preliminary way, the use of this structure
along with some of the equipment already in place as auxiliary fish hatchery for the Authority.
Further investigation of the potential for this site, and the costs involved is required.
The Caretaker's Residence is being occupied by the former caretaker on a rental basis. The lease
for this residence was recently extended, The main house is also being rented to a member of the
public on a yearly lease. The cottage is occupied by a member of the Authority staff. Authority staff
are providing grass cutting around the main residence and snow ploughing to maintain access to
the residences on the property. .
As noted above, the Oak Ridges Trail currently follows the unopened road allowance which
traverses the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area. There have been some discussions with the Oak
Ridges Trail association with regard to routing the trail elsewhere on the property, but this issue has
not yet been resolved. At present, recreational fishing is not permitted on the property and, as per
Authority regulations, hunting is prohibited.
No restriction has been placed on access to the property for hiking or nature appreciation. Staff
have indicated that the lands are currently being used for informal recreation, largely by the local
community.
E12 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 August21,1998
Attachment 6
3.4 Vegetation and Wildlife
Much of the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area is low lying and wet and is dominated by Eastern White
Cedar (Thuja occidentalis). Drier areas include some Sugar Maple (Acer saccharum)/Beech (Fagus
grandifolia) forest and some areas populated by Eastern Hemlock (Tsugas canadesis). The
vegetative community in the Secord lands includes a number of Boreal species, and both regionally
rare and regionally uncommon plants have been found.
Extensive reforestation was carried out in the past as characterized by two large plantations in the
northern part of the property. Some old field habitat remains, especially in the western part of the
property around the buildings and, as noted above, a portion of the property is maintained as cut
grass and more formal horticultural landscaping.
The large pond provides attractive habitat for migratory and resident waterfowl and beaver activity
has been recently noted on the property. A number of Boreal forest bird have been sighted on the
property and there is a recorded sighting of the regionally rare White-throated Sparrow (Zonotrichia
albicollis). Salmon, Rainbow Trout and Speckled Trout are present on the property.
Detailed inventories of flora and fauna present at the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area are in progress,
These inventories will be used to assist in developing long term plans for the property,
3.5 Environmentally Significant Areas
Most of the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area is within the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) Number 110 (see Figure 2) . This ESA, known as the North
Glasgow Area serves a vital ecological function by maintaining the hydrological balance over a
widespread area. The presence of the ESA will limit the activities or potential development which
might be permitted on the lands.
3.6 Buildings and Infrastructure
The Secord Forest and Wildlife Area currently contains four residences and a barn. Other built
features on the lands include the main dam and a network of paved and gravel roads and driveways
(see Figure 2).
3.6,1 Main House
This 3140 square feet two bedroom structure dates from 1965 and offers a scenic view of
the large pond. It is currently rented to a member of the public for residential use. A variety
of maintenance needs related to the exterior of the building have been identified, including
replacement of the roof. The balance of the exterior work required is relatively minor in
nature, and should be accommodated through rental revenue.
3.6.2 Cottage
This structure is located immediately adjacent to the large pond and has a floor space of
approximately 1000 square feet. The building is currently occupied by a member of the
Authority staff in order to accommodate security and maintenance of the site. A number of
repairs have been carried out to make the building habitable however, more improvements
would be required in order to make the building suitable for any public use.
August 21, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 E13
Attachment 7
,
ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS STUDY Figure 2
) !he meuaooli..n tlllOnta and regIon COnMNatlon aulhonty
.
ISA No.. 110
~
0
0
-
"
~
--
~-':;,"::",:I E.S.A. SITE
- 0 1000 .
- ~ l}-of J-t ...... foooI ......
METRES
E14 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 August 21. 1998
Attachment 8
3.6.3 Farm House
This building has been vacant for some time and is in need of significant repairs to
mechanical systems and the structure itself. The building does, however offer a floor space
of 3180 square feet and may, in the long run be suitable for a user willing to invest in the
work required to bring it up to standard. The house is currently unoccupied.
3.6.4 Caretaker's House
This 1000 square foot structure is located at the entrance to the site. The building continues
to be occupied by the former site caretaker on a rental basis, and is in a reasonably good
state of repair. In the long term this structure may have some suitability as a gatehouse or
site office.
3.6.5 Barn
Some minor repair work is needed to the barn, however, it is in fair condition. As noted
above, there is some potential to link this structure, which measures 40 by 60 feet, to a
proposed fish hatchery operation. At present, the barn is not being used.
3.6.6 Dam
A log dam controls the outlet from the main pond. The dam is overlaid by a bridge which
serves the main entrance road. An inspection of this bridge has revealed that it is currently
adequate for the limited use it receives. If future uses generate more and heavier traffic
however, upgrading to the bridge may be required.
3.6.7 Roads
The roads on site are currently in need of some minor maintenance but are generally in fair
condition. If future uses generate significantly more traffic, some upgrades to these roads
may be required. Access to the south part of the property is currently controlled through a
gate on the main road. The northern section of road is not gated at present.
3.6.8 Septic and Water Systems
All residential structures are currently serviced by well water and septic systems, All systems
except for that for the farmhouse are operational at the moment. It would appear that the
existing systems have adequate capacity to serve the current residential use of the buildings.
Potential well capacity on site is currently unknown.
3.7 The Secord Pond
As noted, the main pond located at the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area is a dominant feature, and
attraction of the site. Bathometric studies of the pond have been carried out and suggest that the
pond is relativelyshallowwith a maximum'depth'01'3.'84 metres (see Figure 3). The pond has been
dredged periodically in the past to maintain adequate depth, and this maintenance need will have
to be taken into account for any future use of the pond.
Some electroshocking work has been carried out on the pond over the past year. These studies
indicate that at present, the reproducing population of fish in the pond is limited,
August 21, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 E15
Attachment 9
-
-
~ Figure 3 c c
-iI Q Q
"Q;:
. II
~ z+ - ~
Q.
lo"
;t: . c
~ ~ E ~
oS: .,J A
..,1 -11
-.:II
.......
d)
~
0
~
Q
.-
~
~
d) .
~ .ii
~
~
...r::
~
CO
I
~
~
0 ~
~ ~
~
~ .5
~
0
Q
d)
~
II.)
c co
]
c: fIl V"\
~fIl~MOV"\CV:~V"\
"t:l ~ II.) I l""'\ N t"l - - 0 0
~ c II.) S ~ I I I , I I I
o.t:c~V:~V:~V:~V'1
o~~~iiii~~~'?
c. -=-..w.!oS ..,
~ 0 f!;=:~ . ;t I
c
8
~
. 0
, ,
E16 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 August 21, 1998
Attachment 10
4.0 PUBLIC USE POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
The policies and guidelines outlined below are intended to set a framework for the interim
management of the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area These will remain in force uritillong term plans
for the property have been established, and will allow for a clear and consistent approach to
managing the lands.
4.1 Ontario Regulation 119
Public access to, and use of Authority lands is governed by Ontario Regulation 119 made under The
Conservation Authorities Act. This Regulation allows the Authority to control or prohibit such
activities as hunting, the use of off road vehicles, cutting of firewood and unauthorized access.
Except as noted below, the regulation will be applied in the same way as for other non-active
Conservation Areas.
4.2 Conservation Easement
A Conservation Easement has been registered on title. This document restricts or prohibits certain
activities on site and therefore is relevant to public use of the property. In general, the agreement
restricts permitted activities to those carried out for conservation or recreational purposes. It also
prohibits hunting, the use of off road vehicles, and the removal of trees or other vegetation except
under certain circumstances. The restrictive covenants are consistent with Authority policy and
practice with regard to management and maintenance of its lands, however they may, in the long
term influence what activities or uses may be permitted on the lands. The interim policies and
guidelines outlined below are consistent with the Conservation Easement.
4.3 Trails
4.3.1 Trail Activities
Trail activities within the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area will, for the duration of the Interim
Management Plan, be limited to hiking and cross country skiing, Authority regulations
restrict other uses such as mountain biking and horseback riding, and it is proposed that
these activities will be prohibited in the interim. Additional trail activities may be considered
and evaluated as part of the longer term planning process for the lands.
4.3.2 Informal Trails
There are numerous informal trails within the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area, especially in
the southern portion of the property. At present, no improvement or expansion of this trail
network will be carried out. Any hazards on the trails which come to the attention of staff will
be removed.
August 21, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 E17
Attachment 11
4.3.3 The Oak Ridges Trail
At present the established route of the Oak Ridges Trail follows the unopened road
allowance which traverses the property (see Figure 1). Some concern has been raised with
regard to this route, in that it is wet for much of the year, and any significant foot traffic is
likely to cause environmental damage. Authority staff have entered into discussions with the
Oak Ridges Trail Association aimed at rerouting the trail through the southern part of the
lands. The proposed route would, for much of its length, follow the established trail which
runs between the main house and the eastern pond. The rest of the route is still under
discussion. It is anticipated that, once the new route is established, no significant changes
to the trail treadway or to trail maintenance practices will be required or carried out.
4.4 Public Access
In general, Authority practice has been to permit public access to all Authority lands for permitted
activities, and to restrict access by exception. This approach will apply to the Secord Forest and
Wildlife Area,
The major concern related to the restriction of public access, involves the privacy and security of
tenants renting houses on the Secord property. In addition, if a fish hatchery is developed in the
area of the barn, access must be restricted to prevent disturbance of the fish and reduce the
possibility of poaching, These twin objectives can be largely achieved by the maintenance of gated
access on the north and south roads extending from the main entrance. If, in the future, the Oak
Ridges Trail is rerouted, provision must be made to avoid, if possible, the residences on the
property.
In order to control access and activities, on Authority lands, signage as prescribed by The Trespass
to Property Act is used. Standard Authority signage will be used at normal points of access to the
Secord Forest and Wildlife Area, including symbols indicating permitted activities,
4.5 Parking
At present, the only publicly accessible parking on the property is adjacent to the pet cemetery.
This area has capacity for ten cars. This parking area will remain accessible to the public but will not
be ploughed during the winter months. If it appears in the future, that the provision of additional
parking is required, this will be dealt with on an "as needed" basis.
. 4.6 Fishing
As noted above, the presence of a self-sustaining fish population in the main pond has not been
established. In order to prevent the degradation of the current fish community at Secord, for
purposes of the Interim Management Plan, public recreational fishing will be prohibited. The
establishment of a sustainable'public"fishery,-or a....pot-and1a1<e.. operation will be considered as part
of the long term planning process.
E18 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 August 21. 1998
Attachment 12
4.7 Pet Cemetery
The pet cemetery located on the property does not fall under the provisions of The Cemeteries Act.
Consequently, there is no requirement on the part of the Authority for perpetual care of the
cemetery, nor do the conditions of sale require continued operation of the cemetery. The option
of the Authority, or of another agent operating the pet cemetery remains open, but requires further
investigation. In the interim, the Authority will continue to cut the grass on the cemetery lands and
will perform basic maintenance. For the purposes of the Interim Management Plan, no new requests
for the burial of pets will be entertained by the Authority.
5.0 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
5.1 Vegetation Management
Consistent with Objective (2) noted above, the general approach to vegetation management at the
Secord Forest and Wildlife Area will be to allow natural succession to proceed wherever possible.
This means that minimal maintenance will be carried out and that vegetation management activities
will be limited to the following:
. removal of dead or damaged trees only where they present a hazard to the public or
threaten real property;
. minor pruning or removal of dead plant material to provide for safe access to trails; and
. grass cutting immediately around residences and at the pet cemetery.
Any felled trees or cut material will be left on site to provide for enhanced wildlife habitat. Any use
of pesticides will be in accordance with the Authority's Pesticide Policy.
5.2 Wildlife Management
Every effort will be made to encourage and enhance the presence of wildlife at the Secord Forest
and Wildlife Area. In instances where conflicts arise between wildlife and human activities on the
lands, the Authority's policy related to human/wildlife conflicts on Authority lands will apply. In
addition, management of the Secord property will be carried out so as to protect, maintain and
enhance habitat to provide shelter, travel corridors and foraging areas for wildlife.
5.3 Fisheries Management and Aquatic Ecosystems
The Secord Forest and Wildlife Area is located in the headwaters of Duffin's Creek which provides
one of the maJor cold water fisheries in the Greater Toronto Area, In the long term, it is hoped that
the management of the Secord property will contribute to the enhancement of a self sustaining cold
water fish communityin -the-OuffilT"Greekwatershed.-Forthe-purposes-of the I nterim Management
Plan, it is important that the management of the property contribute to this objective. As noted
above, recreational fishing on the property will not be permitted. In addition, efforts will be made
to protect and maintain fish habitat though the avoidance of any activities which might degrade
riparian zones, wetlands or which would reduce water quantity or quality.
August 21, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 E19
Attachment 13
5.4 Pond Maintenance
As with any dammed pond, silt will eventually build up in the main pond at the Secord Forest and
Wildlife Area This ultimately may have a negative effect on both the aquatic life of the pond and the
potential for recreational fishing and boating. Consequently, it will likely be necessary, at some
point, to dredge the pond, if it is to be maintained in its present configuration.
It is proposed that, for the purposes of the Interim Plan, no dredging or other major maintenance
of the pond be carried out in the immediate future. The costs and implications of the maintenance
of the pond will be examined in the process of determining the long term plan for the pond.
5.5 Archaeological Resources
The presence of significant archaeological resources within the Secord Forest and wildlife Area is
currently undetermined. In accordance with Authority policy however, any archaeological sites on
the property will be preserved, either by active avoidance or excavation where human disturbance
of the site may occur. In general, the preferential course of action will be avoidance of the site,
6.0 LONG TERM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
6.1 Principles
The Secord Forest and Wildlife Area represents both a significant environmental asset and a major
recreation resource within the Greater Toronto Area. Consequently, it is vital that long term
planning, and any eventual development of the property be carried out with great care. Concurrent
with the implementation of the Interim Management Plan, a comprehensive long term management
plan for the Secord property, addressing both environmental management and public use of the
lands will be developed,
Building on the work carried out for the Interim Management Plan, it is anticipated that the long term
plan will encompass the following principles:
. the plan will be developed on an ecosystem basis and the environmental health of the
ecosystem shall be paramount;
. recreational use of the lands shall be addressed in accordance with the Authority's Strategy
for the Public Use of Authority Lands;
. the plan shall address the Authority's need to generate net revenue; and
. development of the plan will be carried out in a consultative manner with extensive input
from the Secord"Family;1he public;interest'groups;"otherpublic agencies, and user groups.
E20 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 August 21, 1998
Attachment 14
6.2 Process
The development of the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area Management Plan will invo.lve Authority staff
working with an Advisory Group representative of the interests noted above. This group will aid the
Authority in working through a process to determine management zones for the property and
appropriate uses and management protocols for those zones. Opportunities will also be provided
for the public at large to comment on the plan as it is developed through public open houses and
the dissemination of other information. It is hoped that the Advisory Group will form the core of a
panel which will assist the Authority in implementing the Plan and managing the Secord Area in the
future.
6.3 Timeframe
It is anticipated that the final Management Plan for the Secord Forest and Wildlife Area will be
completed by the end of 1999.
August21,1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/98 E 21
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:13 a.m., Friday, August 21,1998.
Donna Patterson J. Craig Mather
Chair Secretary-Treasurer
/ks
~
, THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98
October 16, 1998 Page E22
The Public Use Advisory Board Meeting #3/98, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office, on
Friday, October 16, 1998. The Chair, Donna Patterson, called the meeting to order at 10:58 am.
PRESENT
John Adams .............................................................. Member
Maria Augimeri .......................................................... Vice Chair
Michael Di Biase ........................................................... Member
Richard O'Brien. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chair, Authority
Gerri Lynn O'Connor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Linda Pabst ............................................................... Member
Donna Patterson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair
REGRETS
Bas Balkissoon ............................................................ Member
Doug Dickerson ........................................................... Member
Paul Palleschi ............................................................. Member
RES.#E5/98 - MINUTES
Moved by: Richard O'Brien
Seconded by: John Adams
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #2/98, held on August 21,1998, be approved .... CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
. RES.#E6/98 - 1999 FEE SCHEDULE
Approval. The 1999 Fee Schedule is recommended for approval.
Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Seconded by: John Adams
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the 1999 Fee Schedule as proposed
be approved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRI ED
BACKGROUND
Each year staff reviews the TRCA Fee Schedule to determine changes required for the next
operating year.
E23 PUBUC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 October 16, 1998
RATIONALE
There is one change only proposed for 1999. All other items identified in the approved 1998 Fee
Schedule remain the same.
The proposed change is to section 25 which deals with parking fees at Black Creek Pioneer Village.
The 1998-2000 Business Plan approved by the Authority earlier this year identified that in 1999 the
parking fees at BCPV would increase from $4 to $5. T 0 implement this, section 25 of the 1998 Fee
Schedule must be amended to read:
PST GST Base
25.0 For parking at Black Creek Pioneer Village, per vehicle, 0.35 0.30 4.35
per day, exclusive of general admission.
Comparable parking fees are: Toronto Zoo, $5, McMichael Art gallery $3, Science Centre $5, York
University, $7, Wonderland, $6.50, Casa Loma, $7/day, Wild water Kingdom $5.
The increased fee is estimated to produce about $20,000 in additional revenue to the Village.
For information contact: Jim Dillane, extension 220
Date: October 7, 1998
Attachment (1)
October 16, 1998 PUBUC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 E24
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule Public Facllltl.. and Programming V1.0 97.1024
Conservation Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. items 1 to 24
Black Creek Pioneer Village .................................................... items 25 to 31
Kortright Centre for Conservation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. items 32 to 33
Miscellaneous ..................................................................... item 34
Discounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . items 01 to 02
The MTRCA's 1998 Fee Schedule was approved by the Authority on September 26,1997 (Meeting 8/97, Res.
#A180/97). Most fees listed in this Schedule take effect January 1,1998. Those fees related to winter activities
will take effect with the commencement of winter operations late in 1997.
Gross fees listed in the Schedule and printed in bold face are those amounts to be quoted to the public. These
fees include any applicable federal or provincial taxes. Detail is provided as to actual base fees and related
tax amounts.
Additional copies of this Fee Schedule may be obtained from Watershed Management 1 Conservation Areas.
This document may be found online as f:\fo\publlc\fees\fee98 or f:\cs\genlnfo\fee98 in WordPerfect formats
v5.1 (0051 fee98.doc) and v6.1 (Windows 1 fee98.wpd).
Supplementary information related to pass programs at Black Creek Pioneer Village, Conservation Areas and
Kortright will be made available at f:\fo\publlc\fees\paas98 and f:\cs\genlnfo\paas98.
Updated material may be distributed from time to time to include supplementary fees which are related to
specific program activities or to reflect changes to the Schedule.
Printing history
v1.0 97.10.24 original release date
Significant changes
Please be sure to review this updated Fee Schedule in its entirety in order to familiarize yourself with it. Note
that several significant changes have been made as follows:
Admission fees at Albion Hills and Glen Haffy brought into line with admission fees at other Conservation Areas
(weekend and weekday fees applied).
Increase to program specific fees at Glen Hafty (angling) and Petticoat Creek (swimming).
General increase to cross-country trail fees, trail passes at Albion Hills; introduction of seniors rates,
introduction of half-day rates.
General increase to admission and tour fees at Black Creek Pioneer Village.
Items for clarification or notice of error or omissions may be directed to the attention of Terry Wiegard, ext. 311 .
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming v1.0 97.10.24
~
E25 PUBUC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 October 16, 1998
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Definition of Terms
1 Age ~tegories
Four general age groups are used throughout the fee schedule as follows:
Adult - any person from fifteen to sixty-four.
Child - any person from five to fourteen.
Child (pre-schoolers) - any person four years of age or under.
Senior - any person sixty-five years of age or over.
Some exceptions to this general categorization apply to specific fee schedule items and are detailed under
those items.
2 Conservation Area
The term Conservation Area applies to Albion Hills, Bruce's Mill, Boyd, Glen Haffy, Greenwood, Heart Lake and
Petticoat Creek. Also included in this definition are the public campgrounds at Albion Hills and Indian Line.
For the purposes of this fee schedule the definition does not include the Kortright Centre for Conservation or
Black Creek Pioneer Village.
3 General admission
General admission allows for basic access to a specified MTRCA venue(s) during a designated operating
period(s). Other fees may be charged in addition to, or in lieu of, general admission fees for certain facilities,
programs or operating periods as identified in this fee schedule or under various operating policies.
4 Group Camper
Applies to members of an organized group staying overnight at a Conservation Area by permit.
5 Day Camper
Applies to members of day cares, day camps, schools or the like, who are visiting a Conservation Area during
the regular operating day.
6 Operating policies
This fee schedule is provided as a general summary of fees applied by the MmCA at it various operating
venues. It does not provide, nor is it intended to provide, complete information as to the various regulations
and operating policies in effect at theses venues which may relate to individual fee schedule items. Daily,
seasonal and program operating schedules and minimum group size requirements are among these policies.
7 Discounts and premiums
Any fee may be subject to a discount or premium at the discretion of the appropriate Manager.
8 Supplementary fees
Not all fees are considered to be part of the MTRCA's fee schedule as approved by the Authority. Some are
set independently of that schedule. The sale of retail merchandise or the provision of incidental services
represent the most common examples of such fees.
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming d.O 97.10.24
October 16, 1998 PUBUC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 E26
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Contents
after-hours use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. BCPV ..................................... 28.0
after-hours use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conservation Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. see late permit
Albion Hills farm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., Albion Hills ................................... 34.0
angling fee .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Glen Haffy .................................... 5.0
annual pass .............................. BCPV .................................... 27.0
see elso memberships
annual pass ......................... Conservation Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0
annual pass ............................. Kortright ................... see memberships (33.0)
barbecue 1 corn pot rental ............. Conservation Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.6
camping - day campers ............... Conservation Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.0
camping - group campers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conservation Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.0
camping - group campsite ............. Conservation Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.0
camping - monthly site ................... Albion Hills .............................. 122,13.2
camping - group / Pleasantview . . . . . . . . . . .. Albion Hills ................................... 14.0
camping - public camping ........... Albion Hills, Indian Line. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12.0,13.0,14.0
camping - seasonal site ............. Albion Hills, Indian Line. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12.3,13.3,13.5
camping - serviced site. . . . . . . . . . . . .. Albion Hills, Indian Line. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13.0
camping - supplementary fees ........ Albion Hills, Indian Line .............................. 15.0
fees for extra cempers end perking for extra celS
camping - unserviced site. . . . . . . . . . .. Albion Hills, Indian Line ..............................12.0
chalet rental . . . . . .- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Albion Hills, Bruce's Mill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.0
commercial photography .......... Conservation Areas, Kortright ...........................19.0
commercial photography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. BCPV .....................................30.0
cross-country skiing - equipment rentals . . . .. Albion Hills ................................... 23.0
cross-country skiing - group rate ........... Albion Hills .............................. 23.5, 23.6
cross-country skiing - trail fees 1 full-day ..... Albion Hills ................................... 20.0
cross-country skiing - trail fees / half-day. . . .. Albion Hills ................................... 21 .0
cross-country skiing - seasonal pass ... . . . .. Albion Hills ................................... 22.0
Dickson Hill School . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . .. BCPV ....................................26.10
educational tours - BCPVactivity program ..... BCPV ................................ 26.8, 26.9
educational tours - BCPV tour program. . . . . . .. BCPV ..................................... 26.7
fire permit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conservation Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.5
fishing - cabin rental ........... Glen Haffy Headwaters Trout Ponds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3
fishing - public ponds ..................... Glen Haffy .................................... 5.0
fishing - pond rentals . . . . . . . . . . . Glen Haffy Headwaters Trout Ponds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.0
general admission - BCPV .................. BCPV ..................................... 26.0
general admission, weekends. . . . . . . . . . . Conservation Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0
general admission, weekdays. . . . . . . . . . . Conservation Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0
general admission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Kortright .................................... 32.0
group discounts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. BCPV, Kortright ................................. 0.1
guided tour .............................. BCPV ..................................... 31.0
handicapped persons .......... BCPV, Conservation Areas, Kortright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 0.2
late permit .......................... Conservation Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.0
maple syrup tours - child. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Bruce's Mill ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24.1
maple syrup tours - adult ................. Bruce's Mill .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242
memberships............................. BCPV .................................... .27.4
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming d.O 97.10.24
E27 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 October 16, 1998
memberships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Kortright .................................... 33.5
parking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. BCPV ..................................... 25.0
parking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Petticoat Creek .................................. 3.0
pedalboat rentals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conservation Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.0
picnics - additional picnickers. . . . . . . . . . . Conservation Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
picnics - picnic shetter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conservation Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 16.3, 16.4
picnics - picnic site ................... Conservation Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.0
pool pass .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Petticoat Creek ................................. 18.0
rowboat rentals ......................... Heart Lake ...........,......................... 8.0
skiing ........................................... see cross country skiing (20.0, 21.0, 22.0, 23.0)
swimming - annual pass ................ Petticoat Creek ................................. 18.0
swimming - daily admission ............. Petticoat Creek ................................. 17.0
wagon 1 sleigh rides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. BCPV ..................................... 29.0
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming ,,1.0 97.10.24
October 16, 1998 PUBUc USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 E28
MTRCA Fee Schedule 11998
PST GST 1998 1998
Item description 8% ~~ Base Gross
1.0 For general admission at all Conservation Areas
except Petticoat Creek, per day, on weekends and
holidays, or for designated special programs;
1.1 for each adult from fifteen to sixty-four years of
age. 0.00 026 3.74 4.00
1.2 for each child from five to fourteen years of age. 0.00 0.13 1.87 2.00
1.3 for each child four years of age or under. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.4 for each senior sixty-five years of age or over. 0.00 0.20 2.80 3.00
2.0 For general admission at all Conservation Areas
except Petticoat Creek, per day, on weekdays;
2.1 for each adult from fifteen to sixty-four years of
age. 0.00 0.23 3.27 3.50
2.2 . for each child from five to fourteen years of age. 0.00 0.13 1.87 2.00
2.3 for ~ach child four years of age or under. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.4 for each senior sixty-five years of age or over. 0.00 0.16 2.34 2.50
3.0 For parking at Petticoat Creek, per vehicle, per day;
3.1 on weekends and holidays. 0.00 0.59 8.41 9.00
3.2 on weekdays. 0.00 0.46 6.54 7.00
3.3 for a vehicle carrying more than ten persons, per
person. 0.00 0.13 1.87 2.00
4.0 For an annual pass at any Conservation Area;
4.1 for a family of one or two adults and their children
who are fourteen years of age or under. 0.00 4.71 6729 72.00
4.2 for each adult from fifteen to sixty-four years of
age. 0.00 2.09 29.91 32.00
4.3 for each child from five to fourteen years of age. 0.00 1.05 14.95 16.00
4.4 for each child four years of age or under. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.5 for each senior sixty-five years of age or over. 0.00 1.44 20.56 22.00
MTRCA 1998 Fcc Schcdulc - Public Facilitics and Programming v1.0 97.10.24
E29 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 October 16, 1998
MTRCA Fee Schedule / 1998
PST GST 1998 1998
Item description 8% 7% Base Gro..
5.0 For fishing at Glen Haffy;
5.1 per day, for each person fifteen years of age or
over, exclusive of general admission. 0.00 023 327 3.50
52 per day, for each person from five to fourteen
years of age, exclusive of general admission. 0.00 0.07 0.93 1.00
5.3 per day, for each person four years of age or
under, exclusive of general admission. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.0 For a permit for the use of a fishing pond at the Glen
Haffy Headwaters Trout Ponds, including general
admission and the use of row boats, per day;
6.1 on weekends and holidays. 0.00 16.36 233.64 250.00
6.2 on weekdays. 0.00 9.81 140.19 150.00
6.3 for the use of the cabin in conjunction with a
permit issued under 6.1 or 6.2. 0.00 523 74.77 80.00
7.0 For a permit for the use of the chalet building at Albion
Hills or Bruce's Mill, exclusive of general admission;
7.1 for a half day (four hours). 0.00 9.81 140.19 150.00
7.2 for each additional hour for a youth group. 0.00 2.62 37.38 40.00
7.3 for each additional hour for other groups. 0.00 3.27 46.73 50.00
7.4 for the use of kitchen facilities, where available, in
conjunction with a permit issued under item 7.0. 0.00 327 46.73 SO.OO
8.0 For the rental of boating equipment where available;
8.1 for a rowboat, per hour. 0.49 0.43 6.08 7.00
8.2 for a rowboat, per half-day (four hours). 1.74 1.52 21.74 25.00
8.3 for a pedalboat, per hour. 0.70 0.61 8.69 10.00
9.0 For a permit authorizing a special event extending
past regular operating hours and up to midnight,
exclusive of parking or general admission, per hour,
subject to a three hour minimum. 0.00 327 46.73 SO.OO
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming d.O 97.10.24
October 16. 1998 PUBUc USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 E30
MTRCA Fee Schedule /1998
PST GST 1998 1998
Item description 8% ~" Base Gross
10.0 For a permit to use a designated group campsite,
subject to a limit of seven nights use, per night;
10.1 for each person, subject to a minimum charge of
$50.00 0.00 0.16 2.34 2.50
11.0 For each day camper, not overnight, per day, inclusive
of general admission. 0.00 0.10 1.40 1.50
12.0 For a permit to occupy an individual un-serviced
campsite, inclusive of general admission;
12.1 at Albion Hills, per night. 0.00 1.18 16.82 18.00
122 at Albion Hills, per month (28 days). 0.00 23.55 336.45 360.00
12.3 at Albion Hills, per season. 0.00 63.13 901 .87 965.00
12.4 at Indian Line, per night. 0.00 1.24 17.76 19.00
12.5 ' on a holiday or other designated date, in addition
to the basic permit fee specified in item 12.1 or
12.4 0.00 0.13 1.87 2.00
13.0 For a permit to occupy an individual serviced
campsite, with water and hydro hook-ups, inclusive of
general admission;
13.1 at Albion Hills, per night. 0.00 1.37 19.63 21.00
13.2 at Albion Hills, per month (28 days). 0.00 27.48 392.52 420.00
1250.0
13.3 at Albion Hills, per season. 0.00 87.50 0 1337.50
13.4 at Indian Line, per night. 0.00 1.57 22.43 24.00
16822
13.5 at Indian Line, per season. 0.00 117.76 4 1800.00
13.6 on a holiday or other designated date, in addition
to the basic permit fee specified in item 13.1 or
13.4 0.00 0.13 1.87 2.00
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming d.O 97.10.24
E31 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 October 16, 1998
MTRCA Fee Schedule /1998
PST GST 1998 1998
Item description 8% 7% Base Gross
14.4 for each addtional camping unit, in conjunction
with a permit issued to youth group under item
14.3 0.00 0.98 14.02 15.00
15.0 In addition to basic camping fees as specified in items
12.0 and 13.0;
15.1 for a permit to park an additional vehicle. 0.00 0.33 4.67 5.00
15.2 for each additional person occupying a campsite
over and above the campground's specified site
limit. 0.00 0.26 3.74 4.00
16.0 For a permit for the use of a group picnic site at any
Conservation Area, exclusive of parking or general
admission, per day;
16.1 for a group of up to 100 persons. 0.00 3.93 56.07 80.00
16.2 . for each additional fifty or fewer persons, in
conjunction with a permit issued under item 16.1. 0.00 0.98 14.02 15.00
16.3 for the use of a picnic shetter with electrical
service, in conjunction with a permit issued under
item 16.1. 0.00 3.93 56.07 80.00
16.4 for the use of a picnic shetter without electrical
service, in conjunction with a permit issued under
item 16.1 0.00 3.60 51.40 55.00
16.5 for a permit for a fire in a designated ground fire
pit, in addition to any fees paid under item 16.0. 0.00 3.93 56.07 80.00
16.6 for the use of a portable barbecue unit or corn 40.00
pot, in addition to any fees paid under item 16.0. 2.78 2.43 34.79
For admission to the swimming area at Petticoat
17.0 Creek, exclusive of parking or general admission;
17.1 per day, for each person two years of age or over. 0.00 0.13 1.87 2.00
17.2 for each child under two years of age. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
17.3 for a book of ten pool passes. 0.00 1.14 16.36 17.50
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming vl.O 97.10.24
October 16, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 E32
MTRCA Fee Schedule / 1998
PST GST 1998 1998
Item description 8% T'k Base Gross
18.0 For a seasonal pass for admission to the swimming
area at Petticoat Creek, inclusive of parking or
general admission, valid any operating day;
18.1 for a family consisting of one or two adults and
their children who are fourteen years of age or
under. 0.00 6.54 93.46 100.00
182 for each adult from fifteen to sixty-four years of
age. 0.00 2.62 37.38 40.00
18.3 for each child from five to fourteen years of age. 0.00 1.77 2523 27.00
18.4 for each child four years of age or under. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
18.5 for each senior sixty-five years of age or over. 0.00 1.96 28.04 30.00
18.6 for a family consisting of one or two adults and
their children who are fourteen years of age or
under, valid weekdays only. 0.00 4.57 70.43 75.00
19.0 For commercial photography or filming in any
Conservation Area or at the Kortright Centre, including
the use of grounds and environs and supervision,
minimum per hour;
19.1 during normal operating hours. 0.00 4.25 60.75 65.00
19.2 outside normal operating hours. 0.00 5.89 84.11 90.00
20.0 For the use of cross-country ski trails at Albion Hills,
inclusive of general admission;
20.1 for each person fifteen years of age or over. 0.00 0.65 9.35 10.00
202 for each child five to fourteen years of age. 0.00 0.33 4.67 5.00
20.3 for each child four years of age or under. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
20.4 for each senior sixty-five years of age or over. 0.00 0.52 7.48 8.00
20.5 for a family of one or two adults and their children
who are fourteen years of age or under. 0.00 1.64 23.36 25.00
21.0 For the use of cross-country ski trails at Albion Hills,
inclusive of general admission, after 1 p.m.;
21.1 for each person fifteen years of age or over. 0.00 0.52 7.48 8.00
21.2 for each child five to fourteen years of age. 0.00 020 2.80 3.00
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming vl.O 97.10.24
E33 PUBUc USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 October 16, 1998
MTRCA Fee Schedule 11998
PST GST 1998 1998
Item description 8% 7% Base Gross
21.3 for each child four years of age or under. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
21.4 for each senior sixty-five years of age or over. 0.00 0.39 5.61 6.00
22.0 For a seasonal pass for the use of cross-country ski
trails at Albion Hills, including general admission:
22.1 for each person fifteen years of age or over. 0.00 327 46.73 50.00
22.2 for each child fourteen years of age or under. 0.00 0.98 14.02 15.00
22.3 for each senior sixty-five years of age or over. 0.00 2.62 37.38 40.00
22.4 for a family of one or two adults and their children
who are fourteen years of age or under. 0.00 720 102.80 110.00
23.0 For the rental of a cross-country ski equipment
package consisting of skis, boots and poles;
23.1 for each person fifteen years of age or over, per
day. 0.90 0.79 11.31 13.00
23.2 for each person fifteen years of age or over. per
day, after 1 :00 p.m. 0.63 0.55 7.82 9.00
23.3 for each child fourteen years of age or under, per
day. 0.70 0.60 8.70 10.00
23.4 for each child fourteen years of age or under, per
day, after 1 :00 p.m. 0.52 0.46 6.52 7.50
23.5 for each person fifteen years of age or over, in a
group with a reservation, including trail fees, per
day, subject to a minimum group size. 0.91 0.79 11.30 13.00
23.6 for each person fourteen years of age or under, in
a group with a reservation, including trail fees, per
day, subject to a minimum group size. 0.55 0.49 6.96 8.00
24.0 For a guided tour at Bruce's Mill during the maple
syrup program, subject to a minimum group size of
twenty persons;
24.1 for each child fourteen years of age and under. 0.00 023 327 3.50
242 for each adult fifteen years of age or over. 0.00 029 4.21 4.50
25.0 For parking at Black Creek Pioneer Village, per
vehicle, per day, exclusive of general admission. 028 024 3.48 4.00
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming 'f1.0 97.10.24
October 16, 1998 PUBUc USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 E34
MTRCA Fee Schedule 11998
PST GST 1998 1998
Item description 8% 7% Base Gro..
26.0 For general admission to the Black Creek Pioneer
Village, during the regular operating season, per day;
26.1 for each adult from fifteen to sixty-four years of
age. 0.00 0.59 8.41 9.00
26.2 for each child from five to fourteen years of age. 0.00 0.33 4.67 5.00
26.3 for each child four years of age or under
accompanying their family. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
26.4 for each child four years of age or under visiting
as part of an organized group under supervision. 0.00 0.26 3.74 4.00
26.5 for each senior sixty-five years of age or over. 0.00 0.46 6.54 7.00
26.6 for each student fifteen years of age or over, with
student identification. 0.00 0.46 6.54 7.00
26.7 for each student participating in a general tour
program. 0.00 0.36 5.14 5.50
26.8 for each student participating in a specially
designated tour program, subject to a minimum
group size. 0.00 0.41 5.84 6.25
26.9 for each student participating in a designated
activity program, subject to a minimum group
size. 0.00 0.59 8.41 9.00
26.1 for each student participating in the Dickson Hill
0 School program, per day, subject to a minimum
group size of twenty persons. 0.00 0.36 5.14 5.50
27.0 For an annual pass valid for general admission,
exclusive of parking fees, for the Black Creek Pioneer
Village;
27.1 for a family of one or two adults and their children
who are fourteen years of age or under. 0.00 2.94 42.06 45.00
27.2 for a person five years of age or over. 0.00 1.64 23.36 25.00
27.3 1000.0
for a corporate citizenship. 0.00 0.00 0 1000.00
27.4 for a premium citizenship, refer to program
specific promotional pieces for pricing.
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming vl.O 97.10.24
------
E35 PUBUc USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 October 16. 1998
MTRCA Fee Schedule / 1998
PST GST 1998 1998
Item description 8% T'-' Base Gro..
28.0 For the after-hours use of Black Creek Pioneer Village,
including staffing, commencing within one-half hour of
normal closing time and subject to a three-and-one-
half hour maximum;
28.1 for the use of the Village grounds only from May to
September. 0.00 24.50 350.00 374.SO
28.2 for the use of the Village grounds only from
October to April. 0.00 31.50 450.00 481.SO
28.3 1295.0
including the use of three buildings. 0.00 90.65 0 1385.65
28.4 1595.0
including the use of four buildings. 0.00 111 .65 0 1706.65
28.5 1895.0
including the use of six buildings. 0.00 132.65 0 2027.65
28.6 including the use of eight buildings. 0.00 153.65 2195.0 2348.65
29.0 For a horse-drawn wagon or sleigh ride at the Black
Creek Pioneer Village;
29.1 in conjunction with an after-hours function as
identified in item 28.0, with completion of wagon
rides within 90 minutes of regular closing time, per
wagon. 0.00 1225 175.00 187.25
29.2 items 29.2 and 29.3 subject to a late charge of
$50.00 per half-hour per wagon; gross charges
not to exceed a maximum of $500.00. 0.00 3.27 46.73 SO.oo
29.3 in conjunction with an after-hours function as
identified in item 28.0 for rides scheduled more
than 90 minutes after regular closing. 0.00 35.00 500.00 535.00
30.0 For commercial photography or filming in the Black
Creek Pioneer Village, including supervision, minimum
per hour;
30.1 for the use of grounds and environs, during the
period from 8:30 a.m. until midnight. 0.00 8.18 116.82 125.00
302 for the use of grounds and environs, during the
period from midnight until 8:30 a.m. 0.00 11.45 163;55 175.00
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming ,,1.0 97.10.14
- -------
October 16, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 E36
MTRCA Fee Schedule /1998
PST GST 1998 1998
Item description 8% 7% Base Gross
30.3 for the use of the interior of buildings, during the
period from 8:30 a.m. until midnight. 0.00 9.81 140.19 150.00
30.4 for the use of the interior of buildings, during the
period from midnight until 8:30 a.m. 0.00 11.45 163.55 175.00
31.0 For a guided tour at the Black Creek Pioneer Village,
as part of a tour group with a reservation, including
general admission;
31.1 for each adult from fifteen to sixty-four years of
age. 0.00 0.72 10.23 10.95
31.2 for each senior sixty-five years of age or over. 0.00 0.59 8.36 8.95
32.0 For general admission at the Kortright Centre for
Conservation;
for each adult from fifteen to sixty-four years of
32.1 age. 0.00 0.33 4.67 5.00
322 for each child from five to fourteen years of age. 0.00 020 2.80 3.00
32.3 for each child four years of age or under
accompanying their family. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
32.4 for each child four years of age or under visiting
as part of an organized group under supervision. 0.00 0.15 2.10 2.25
32.5 for each senior sixty-five years of age or over. 0.00 0.20 2.80 3.00
32.6 for each student participating in a general tour
program, subject to a minimum group size. 0.00 0.25 3.50 3.75
32.7 for each student participating in a specially
designated tour program, subject to a minimum
group size. 0.00 0.31 4.44 4.75
33.0 For an annual pass valid for general admission to the
Kortright Centre for Conservation;
33.1 for a family. 0.00 3.93 56.07 60.00
33.2 for an individual. 0.00 3.14 44.86 48.00
33.3 for an individual senior. 0.00 2.81 40.19 43.00
33.4 for a senior couple. 0.00 3.60 51.40 55.00
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming vl.O 97.10.24
E37 PUBUc USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 October 16, 1998
MTRCA Fee Schedule 11998
PST GST 1998 1998
Item descriDtion 8% 7% Base Gro..
33.5 for a premium membership, refer to program
specific promotional pieces for information.
34.0 For a farm tour at the Albion Hills Farm, for a group of
up to forty persons;
34.1 for a half-day program. 0.00 6.54 93.46 100.00
34.2 for a full-day program. 0.00 13.08 186.92 200.00
0.1 At Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Kortright
Centre, twenty percent (20%) off regular per person
admission fees, subject to a minimum group size of
twenty persons, exclusive of guided tours.
0.2 At Black Creek Pioneer Village fifty percent (50%) off
general admission fees for handicapped persons and
their attendants to a maximum ratio of 1 :1.
At Conservation Areas and the Kortright Centre
attendants for handicapped persons will not be
subject to general admission fees.
MTRCA 1998 Fee Schedule - Public Facilities and Programming v1.0 97.10.24
October 16, 1998 PUBUc USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 E38
RES.#E7/98 - THE CONSERVATION LANDS OF ONTARIO
Authority Partnership. Support from the Authority for a partnership with the
Conservation Lands of Ontario.
Moved by: Maria Augimeri
Seconded by: Unda Pabst
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the proposed partnership between
the Conservation Lands of Ontario and The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority be
endorsed;
THAT staff be authorized to enter into a one year partnership agreement, with an option to
renew, at a cost of $15,000, to commence In January of 1999;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to report back through the Public Use Advisory Board
with regard to the results accruing from the initial partnership agreement ...... CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Conservation Lands of Ontario (TCLO) is a private/public tourism partnership which develops
and delivers sustainable ecotourism and outdoor recreation packages, utilizing conservation
authority properties, primarily in the Greater Toronto Area Current partners in TCLO are the Grand
River, Halton Region, Hamilton Region, Long Point Region and Niagara Peninsula Conservation
Authorities. The Canadian Tourism Council has provided funding for the partnership, and fifty
private sector partners are involved in delivering ecotourism programs.
TLCO recently extended an invitation to The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to join as
a full partner. The partnership agreement involved would extend for a period of one year, at a cost
of $15,000. Senior Authority management have explored the benefits of a partnership with TLCO,
and believe strongly that The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority would benefit from this
involvement.
RATIONALE
Authority staff have already begun to develop and market sustainable outdoor recreation and
ecotourism packages as a means to bring more members of the public in contact with the natural
areas managed by the Authority. It is also hoped that moving into these new markets and product
areas will allow the Authority to generate incremental revenues to assist in meeting present and
future budgetary needs. Several pilot programs have already been developed and are being
marketed for next season.
E39 PUBUc USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 October 16, 1998
Staff feel that the work carried out to date by The Conservation Lands of Ontario is consistent with
the efforts made by the Authority and that a partnership will, in fact, allow us to reach new markets,
develop new products and take advantage of joint marketing and ventures with other participants.
TLCO has been up and running for several years and has begun to establish a presence in the
Greater Toronto Area as a source for quality ecotourism experiences. The group has established
a track record in marketing a number of successful events, packages and programs, and
participation by the Authority will allow us to take advantage of the strong brand which has
developed. Staff are of the opinion that the initial outlay to enter into the partnership will be more
than offset by the return from the additional business accruing to the Authority. In addition, it should
be noted that TCLO is anxious to tap into the lucrative Toronto market, and entering into a
partnership will reduce the likelihood of counter productive competition in this area
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Provision for the $15,000 cost for the initial partnership agreement will be made in the Authority's
1999 Operating Budget.
For information contact: Andy Wickens, extension 252
Date: October 5, 1998
RES.#E8/98 - 1999 CONSERVATION AREAS CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT
Proposed Projects. Approval of the proposed project list for 1999
Conservation Areas Capital Development.
Moved by: Michael Di Biase
Seconded by: Maria Augimeri
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the proposed project list for 1999
Conservation Areas Capital Development be approved;
THAT staff be Authorized to proceed with these projects subject to the approved level of
funding for this component of the Authority's 1999 Capital Budget;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized to take whatever action
is required In connection with these projects, Including the execution of any documenta.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRI ED
October 16, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 E40
BACKGROUND
As part of the Authority's 1999 Capital Budget process, a list of proposed projects for the
Conservation Areas and the Kortright Centre for Conservation has been developed. As in past
years, these projects have been identified with a view to meeting the need for:
- improving visitor service levels
- net revenue generation.
- rejuvenation of basic infrastructure.
RATIONALE
The Authority's Business Plan requires Conservation Area operations to be self funding by the year
2001. Improvement in the product we offer to our visitors is an important component in the overall
approach to meeting this objective. Staff have identified priority projects using the criteria noted
above based on the anticipated funding level for 1999. The capital projects included, directly
address needs which have been identified by our visitors such as better washrooms and more picnic
tables. In addition, the condition of basic infrastructure associated with our Conservation Areas,
such as roads and buildings, has deteriorated in recent years due to severe restrictions on funding.
Some of the projects included, represent a step toward rejuvenation of this infrastructure. The list
also includes funds to initiate concept and management plan development for a number of
locations.
1999 CONSERVATION AREAS CAPITAL PROJECTS
1. Conservation Areas Planning $40,000
2. Picnic tables - all locations 50,000
3. Washrooms with composting toilets 125,000
- Albion Hills, Bruce's Mill, Glen Haffy, Kortright
4. Bruce's Mill - Move Gatehouse/ complete Driving Range 30,000
5. Albion Hills & Indian Une Campgrounds - Servicing Upgrades 55,000
6. Kortright - Satellite classroom space, picnic shelter 30,000
7. Road Repaving - Bruce's Mill, Heart Lake, Boyd 100,000
8. Heart Lake - Expansion of Boat Rentals 25,000
9. Heart Lake Beach Centre Renovation 60,000
10. Fencing - all locations 20.000
TOTAL 535.000
E41 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #3/98 October 16, 1998
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The Conservation Areas Capital Budget is funded 50% from municipal levy and 50% from Authority
reserves. Budget levels for 1999 have not yet been determined, but will be clarified as part of the
Authority's overall budget development process. The final project list will be adjusted according to
the level of funding available.
For information contact: Andy Wickens, extension 252
Date: October 5, 1998
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11 :18 a.m., on October 16,1998.
Donna Patterson Craig Mather
Chair Secretary Treasurer
/ks
~
, THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98
November 13, 1998 Page E42
The Public Use Advisory Board Meeting #4/98, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office, on
Friday, November 13, 1998. The Chair, Richard O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 11 :35 a.m.
PRESENT
John Adams .............................................................. Member
Doug Dickerson ........................................................... Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Member
Jim McMaster ................................................... Vice Chair, Authority
Richard O'Brien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chair, Authority
Donna Patterson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chair
REGRETS
Maria Augimeri .......................................................... Vice Chair
Bas Balkissoon ............................................................ Member
Michael Di Biase ........................................................... Member
Linda Pabst ............................................................... Member
Paul Palleschi ............................................................. Member
RES.#E9./98 - MINUTES
Moved by: Doug Dickerson
Seconded by: Richard O'Brien
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/98, held on October 16,1998, be approved. . . . CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#E10/98 - ROUGE PARK TRAIL DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
Area South of Steeles Avenue. Acknowledgement of the Rouge Park
Alliance approval and public release of the Rouge Park Trail Development
and Management Plan.
Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Seconded by: Jim McMaster
E43 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 November 13, 1998
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the staff report on the Rouge Park
Trail Development and Management Plan for the area south of Steeles Avenue be received;
THAT Authority staff continue to participate on the Rouge Park Trail D~velopment and
Management Plan Subcommittee and provide technical review and refinement of detailed trail
planning, design and development initiatives;
THAT the Authority acknowledge the Rouge Park Alliance for successfully completing and
approving the Rouge Park Trail Development and Management Plan;
AND FURTHER THAT the Authority recognize the contribution of the City of Toronto for leading
the Rouge Park Trail planning process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At its meeting #12/97, the Authority adopted Resolution #A326/97:
"THAT the staff report and the presentation by The Toronto Parks and Culture staff on the
Rouge Park Trail Development and Management Plan for the area south of Steeles Avenue
be received;
THA T The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority endorse the Rouge Park Trail
Development and Management Plan for the area south of Steeles Avenue as being consistent
with an integrated watershed management approach and the watershed public use initiatives
of The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority;
THA T Authority staff continue to be involved in the technical review and refinement of detailed
trail planning, design and development initiatives;
THA T the trail management program be modified to ensure that archeological site assessment
occurs prior to any trail upgrade work and new trail development;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Alliance and the City of Toronto be so advised."
At meeting #2/98, the Rouge Park Alliance adopted Resolution #30/97:
"THAT the Rouge Park Alliance approve the Rouge Park Trail Development and Management
Plan;
THA T the Rouge Park Alliance approve printing of the Trail Development and Management
Plan in partnership with the City of Toronto at a cost of no more than $5,000.00 to the Rouge
Park Alliance;
THA T an archeological assessment must occur prior to any proposed new trail alignments,
trail upgrades and associated trail work;
THAT the City of Toronto, Parks and Recreation, inform the Rouge Park Alliance on a semi-
annual basis of any planned works involving Rouge Park Trails;
November 13, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 E44
THA T the Rouge Park Alliance extend as appreciation to the Trail Development and
Management Plan Subcommittee for their work on the Rouge Park Trail Development and
Management Plan;
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance recognize the contribution of staff and thank the City of Toronto
Parks and Recreation Department for leading the Trail planning process;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Alliance members so inform their respective staff. ..
The Rouge Park Trail Development and Management Plan (the trail plan) for the area south of
Steeles Avenue was initiated in the summer of 1996. The trail plan was prepared for The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, Parks and Culture, by a consulting team led by EDA
Collaborative Incorporated. Throughout the course of the trail plan, the consultants reported to the
Rouge Park Trails Subcommittee, comprised of representatives from Rouge Park Alliance partners
including TRCA, Save the Rouge Valley System Inc., and at the time the City of Scarborough. The
other representatives that participated on the Trails Subcommittee included Rouge Park staff,
Ontario Hydro, the Hillside Community Association, and the Ravine Property Owners Association.
The planning process also involved consultation with existing and potential trail user groups and the
public. Consultation events included public meetings, open houses, and user questionnaires.
The purpose of completing the Trail Development and Management Plan was to develop a detailed
trail plan for the park area south of Steeles Avenue based on the vision, park concept and policies
of the Rouge Park Management Plan (1994).
Following completion of the trail plan report, the City of Toronto submitted the plan to the Rouge
Park Alliance. The Alliance then released the trail plan to its partners and relevant agencies asking
them for their comments, endorsement or approval by January 31, 1998. TRCA staff received the
Alliance request and completed a full review of the trail plan. TRCA staff then submitted a report
to the January 9, 1998 meeting of the Authority's Public Use Advisory Board recommending
endorsement of the trail plan subject to the Authority's continued involvement in trail development
and that archeological, site assessment occur prior to any trail upgrade work or new trail
development.
RATIONALE
The Rouge Park Alliance has incorporated the Authority's recommendations into the final approved
Trail Development and Management Plan.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Rouge Park partners, responsible for the provision of trails and related facilities in the park south of
Steeles Avenue, should initiate implementation of the Trail Development and Management Plan in
conjunction with other.park.programs and in COASultatioAwith-relevant stakeholders, including park
residents and landowners. Authority staff will continue to sit on the Rouge Park Trails Subcommittee
and provide detailed trail planning, implementation and management recommendations.
For information contact: Mike Bender, extension 287
Date: October 26, 1998
E45 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 November 13, 1998
RES.#E11/98 - FENCE ADVERTISING
Petticoat Creek Conservation Area. Agreement with Outdoor Impressions
I ncorporated for the provision of fence advertising on a contract basis
utilizing the pool enclosure at Petticoat Creek Conservation Area.
Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Seconded by: Jim McMaster
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to enter into
negotiations with Outdoor I mpressions I ncorporated to develop a partnership agreement for
the provision of fence advertising utilizing the pool enclosure at Petticoat Creek Conservation
Area .............................................................. CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Staff have been approached by Outdoor Impressions Incorporated with a proposal to use chain link
fences on Authority property as a venue for advertising. Outdoor Impressions has developed a
concept which uses coloured plastic inserts in a standard chain link fence to spell out an advertising
message or graphic. The company has a number of current installations at sports fields and other
venues including Bronte Creek Provincial Park.
Under the proposed terms discussed with Outdoor Impressions, they would be responsible for
soliciting advertising clients, and for the installation and maintenance of the ads. In return, the
Authority would receive 20% of their gross advertising revenue. They propose to install a number
of five foot x five foot ads, with the quantity of ads to be negotiated. In April of this year, the Authority
approved a similar proposal for the installation of advertising panels on garbage receptacles.
RATIONALE
Staff have examined the proposal received from Outdoor Impressions and have discussed a number
of potential sites for advertisements. Most of the chain link fence on Authority lands is located on
property boundaries, some of which fronts onto main roads. Staff feel that the placement of
advertising at these types of locations may be considered too intrusive, and may detract from the
image of our Conservation Areas. It was felt, however, that the pool enclosure located at Petticoat
Creek might be a suitable location for this type of advertising, especially if the products advertised
could be associated with the type of activity taking place at the location.
Outdoor Impressions has been made aware of the Authority's Advertising Guidelines and is willing
to comply with these. A copy of these Guidelines is attached. In addition, under any agreement, the
Authority would have the right to select advertisers and review advertising content.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The proponents feel that they could obtain $1,500 per season for a standard advertisement. Based
on this estimate, the Authority's share would be $300 per ad. Based on the projected number of
signs, revenues accruing to the Authority would be between $3,000 and $10,000 per year. There
would be no costs involved for the Authority.
For information contact: Andy Wickens, extension 252
Date: November 2, 1998
Attachments (1)
November 13, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 E46
Attachment 1
ADVERTISING GUIDELINES
Third party Display Boards
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is guided by the general principles
embodied in the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards in determining the acceptability of
advertising for its properties.
TRCA staff are charged with the responsibility of interpreting and implementing the Authority's
guidelines in regard to good taste and other matters. TRCA staff may overrule decisions made by
the sign company regarding the implementation of these guidelines. The Authority (as distinguished
from the TRCA staff) may become involved at its discretion. The Authority will be the sole and final
arbiter in all matters relating to the suitability of advertising content and may refuse, or order removal
of any message at any time, at its discretion.
The TRCA will not accept advertising which disparages, exploits, unfairly represents or is offensive
based on race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual
orientation, disability, age, marital or family status. Advertising that is sexually exploitive is
prohibited.
The TRCA will not accept advertising of questionable taste or which, in its sole discretion, is
considered irritating in its style, content, or method of presentation.
Material calling for the advocacy of, or opposition to, a political point of view, policy, or action is
prohibited.
Material advocating the name of any political party and/or candidacy of an individual, may be
acceptable, providing the content is in keeping with all guidelines and that the message centres
generally on the candidate's name and party affiliation, the office being sought, election date or
other such information pertinent to the election. Material which tends to disparage a candidate, or
party, or cause, will not be allowed.
Religious advertising which promotes a specific ideology, ethic, point of view, policy or action, which
in the opinion of the TRCA might be deemed prejudicial to other religious groups is not permitted.
Tobacco advertising is not acceptable.
E47 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 November 13, 1998
RES.#E12/98 - MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN/WILDLIFE CONFLICTS ON AUTHORITY
LANDS
Approval of a Policy for the Management of Human/Wildlife Conflicts on
Authority Managed Lands.
Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Seconded by: Jim McMaster
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Policy for the Management of
Human/Wildlife Conflicts on Authority Managed Lands be approved. . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority, through its land acquisition and management activities, is a key player in preserving
and restoring wildlife habitat in the Greater Toronto Area. The Authority is also active in providing
public access to green space areas in the region for recreation and other uses. Where these two
mandates overlap, there may be conflict between wildlife and the public, or between wildlife and the
need for the Authority or other landowners to protect structure or properties.
Over the past 15 years, Authority staff have evolved principles and processes for dealing with these
conflicts effectively, but in a manner which balances human needs against the desire to enhance
wildlife populations and diversity. These internal practices have not, as yet been formalized.
RATIONALE
Authority processes for dealing with wildlife problems have been refined over the years and have
generally worked well. Given the potentially sensitive nature of wildlife management efforts, staff feel
it is desirable to formalize current practices through Authority approval. In addition, other agencies
have expressed an interest in adopting the Authority's practices and policy. Staff feel that prior to
doing so, the Authority should ensure that the policy is fully endorsed.
In view of the sensitivity of the issues involved in the policy, staff circulated the document in draft
form to a number of interests including Wildcare, the Animal Alliance, the Toronto Humane Society,
the Federation of Ontario Naturalists and the Ontario Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Network.
Some useful comments were received, and these have been incorporated into the document.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE,DONE
The approved policy will be circulated to other land managers in the Authority's jurisdiction for
information. Staff will continue to monitor research and current practice in this area to ensure that
our procedures are "state of the art".
For information contact:-Andy Wickens,. extension .252
Scott Jarvie, extension 312
Date: November 2, 1998
Attachments (1)
-- --
November 13. 1998 PUBUc USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 E48
Attachment 1
A Policy for the Management of HumanlWildlife Conflicts on
Q Authority Managed lands
Introduction
Many wildlife species have quickly adapted to the rapid urbanization of North America in the last
decade, and many like the beaver have re-colonized much of their former range in Southern
Ontario including areas from which they had been absent for generations. In the Greater Toronto
area this expansion has created both desirable and non desirable consequences resulting from
interaction between humans and various wildlife species.
Although a variety of wildlife is welcome in an urban environment and can provide opportunities for
education and recreational observation, many species quickly adapt to this environment and attain
greater numbers than may exist under natural conditions, Conflict occurs when the habits or
behaviour of the wildlife impact on the lifestyle of the general public. For example, beaver conflicts
have been increasing due to damage to ornamental trees and shrubs, damming activities in
watercourses and health concerns related to the spread of Giardiasis through fecal matter, Other
wildlife species such as the red fox, raccoon, skunk and coyote have adapted to living in close
proximity to humans and now associate them with a source of food and shelter,
Urban wildlife management in itself is sometimes difficult and controversial due to differing opinions
and perceptions by the general public towards wildlife species. In some cases individuals attempt
to attract wildlife for viewing opportunities, which in turn may cause problems for other landowners,
In light of this public concern, staff have reviewed the problem and the existing response systems
in order to develop guidelines for dealing with wildlife activity and management in the Authority's
watersheds, Originally these guidelines were specifically aimed at addressing existing and future
beaver problems, however, they have been expanded to address other nuisance wildlife species
in the GTA Region,
Background
Since the early 1980's Authority staff have responded to numerous complaints regarding the
problems associated with beaver activity on Authority lands and on adjacent, privately owned
property, Typically complaints stem from damage to trees and structures, flooding upstream of
dams and the creation of hazard trees in areas of public use,
In responding to the complaints, staff have evaluated each case based on a number of criteria to
assess the significance or extent of the problem, ~s follows:
1 ) Immediate or future threat to human life: This could be as a result of damage (or
potential damage) to structures, severe flooding or the creation of hazardous conditions in
areas of high public use,
E49 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 November 13, 1998
2) Damage or potential damage to structures or real property: The economic impact of
beaver activities on man-made structures is evaluated,
3) Severe flooding: The extent of flooding upstream of a dam is evaluated including
associated erosion problems and interference with other land uses.
In cases where beaver damage or activity was occurring or caused by beavers inhabiting Authority
lands and one or all of the criteria are relevant the Authority has in the past hired a licensed trapper
to remove the problem animals from the site. Each trapper entered into a written agreement with
the Authority and was restricted to trapping within a given area and time period, and was required
to report the number, age and sex of the animals removed.
At the present time, when possible, the Authority uses existing staff who are licensed trappers to
undertake any removal of problem animals from Authority lands. In addition to being more
convenient, the use of qualified staff allows the Authority to maximize the use of staff skills and
ensure that an adequate amount of time is spent on the problem to achieve the desired results.
As with other trappers, the staff are required to report the number, age and sex of the animals
removed,
In cases where none of the criteria are applicable, the Authority has dismissed the problem as a
natural process in keeping with the management of a natural river valley. The legal responsibility
of the Authority as a landowner has been investigated to determine the consequences of not
responding to beaver problems. It has been found that there is nothing in case law to suggest that
a landowner must remedy a nuisance caused "naturally" by wild animals, however under the Game
and Fish Act any person may destroy or remove a beaver dam if acting in preservation of their
property, This includes removing a beaver dam on an adjacent private property.
More recently staff have received numerous calls from landowners complaining about other wildlife
species, including raccoons, skunks, foxes and coyotes, Concerns are usually related to some
form of property damage or the threat to the safety of themselves, their families or pets. In other
cases the complaints are related to general nuisance or annoyance of the particular species,
Goals and Objectives
In order to effectively deal with human/wildlife conflicts, the Authority has established a response
an,d monitoring system that would meet the following goals and objectives.
Goal #1
Provide an economical means of responding to problems caused by wildlife on Authority
lands and adjacent private property. Objectives include:
1 ) Develop an operating plan for the program including the formation of a response
system made up of qualified staff. Staff would carry out objective analysis and
enact authorized remedial action and evaluation.
November 13, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 E50
2) Develop a method for site-specific analysis of problems on Authority lands. including
authorized methods of control, implementation guidelines and a reporting system.
3) Where possible. incorporate methods that provide e€onomical alternatives to the
landowner, such as contact information for licensed trappers, fact sheets, or options
for habitat modification.
Goal #2
Ensure that problems are handled through ecologically sound, humane and effective
methods. Objectives include:
1 ) Develop procedures for solving the most common problems, including details such
as when box traps, body holding traps or other management techniques should be
used,
2) Encourage the participants to report on the effectiveness of the control, methods
used.
3) Monitor the individuals participating in the program to ensure that the proper
procedures are followed.
Goal #3
Minimize the number of conflicts between humans and wildlife. Objectives include:
1 ) Implement education programs for Authority staff and provide learning opportunities
for the public to provide them with options to reduce conflicts.
2) Manipulate animal numbers through active management programs i.e. altering
habitat in selected ,areas to enhance or reduce its suitability for certain species.
3) Prepare information concerning management options and train Authority staff at
head office and the field centres in methods of disseminating information to the
public.
4) Incorporate wildlife information into site planning in order to reduce conflicts with on-
going Authority programs, activities and land-uses.
Goal #4
Strive for a cooperative effort in program implementation between involved government
agencies, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector. Objectives include:
1 ) Liaise with other groups receiving complaints from the public such as Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR), the Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS), local
E51 PUBUc USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 November 13, 1998
municipalities, humane societies, wildlife rehabilitation centres, and health
departments.
2) Provide assi&tance in the form of education, advice and management options to
land owners including information on contacting private individuals and agencies'
trained in humane removal of wildlife.
Management Options
Basically there are four options available in dealing with wildlife related problems as follows:
1. Inform and educate the public;
2. Do nothing and tolerate the nuisance;
3. Implement measures to prevent the problem from occurring or recurring;
4. Remove the offending individual(s) by lethal or non-lethal means.
Accepting the problem is often the easiest option, however, depending on the type of problems this
may not be feasible. It must be recognised, however, that wildlife is a natural component of the
watershed and like the other natural features (i.e, forests, rivers, streams, etc,) it is the Authority's
responsibility to protect and enhance this resource wherever possible. In many cases, it is the
wildlife component that attracts visitors to the TRCA's various Conservation Areas, Field Centres
and Resource Management Tracts,
Various control methods are available to resource managers to minimize wildlife/human conflicts.
Several options involve some form of habitat manipulation to prevent damage or reduce the
suitability of the site for the particular species, Another option is to physically remove nuisance
wildlife from the problem area using lethal or non-lethal trapping techniques, The following
summarizes each of the techniques that are available:
Prevention
Many methods and techniques for preventing wildlife damage and conflict have been described in
literature,
Education through the provision of information related to wildlife behaviour and basic biology is
often all that is required to minimize or eliminate conflicts, Statistics used by Wildlife Rehabilitation
organizations (Wildcare) suggest that approximately 70% of wildlife conflict situations can be
resolved through a phone call alone,
November 13, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 E52
Exclusion through the use of physical barriers is probably the most important tool for wildlife
managers. Physical barriers are the only wildlife damage control that provides permanent relief and
are the most publicly acceptable form of dealing with wildlife conflicts (Hodge et. al. 1990). Many
forms of exclusion including fences, barriers, screens and tree guards wraps can be utilized. In
each case the objective is to control the animals access to one or more components of their
environment i.e. food, water or shelter.
Habitat modification through the removal of one or several habitat requirements may force wildlife
species to abandon an area and relocate to more suitable habitat. In this respect, food trees, or
den building sites or materials can be removed from the waters edge. Conversely habitat
modification could also include the provision of suitable habitat features i.e. nest boxes, den sites
etc. in order to encourage wildlife away from problem areas.
Repellents are any product or technique that is considered offensive to the animals sense of
touch, taste or smell. As with barriers, repellents can be applied to one or more of the habitat
components in order to force the animal to abandon the area or go elsewhere in search of more
suitable habitat.
Removal or Capture
The most commonly requested option is wildlife control by removal of the nuisance animals from
the area, This can be accomplished through lethal and non-lethal trapping as follows:
Non-lethal removal of the animals would involve live trapping using a box or cage style live trap
and releasing them into another area. Typically wildlife can be live trapped in blind sets with bait
or the traps can be placed at entrances of holes or dens or along frequently travelled paths or
"runways" ,
Lethal removal of individual animals can be accomplished using a variety of sets with either
conibear or leg hold traps, or shooting with a shotgun or rifle. Shooting is permitted under the
Game and Fish Act for the protection of private property, subject to local bylaws,
While live trapping of individual animals may appear to be the most humane option, resource
managers must take into consideration the problems associated with relocating wildlife, Studies
conducted on the live release of nuisance raccoons in urban areas demonstrate that an estimated
75% were dead after 5 months. A similar study on relocated beaver indicated that out of 10 radio
co.llared beaver, 50% were known to have died. 40% were unaccounted for and the remaining 10%
established themselves (Courcelles, Nault 1983),
One reason for this mortality is illustrated in several studies on beaver movement from release
sites, Generally, only a very small percentage of released beaver stay at the point of release.
Studies have concluded that the majority of the released individuals move an average of 11 to 16
km (see Novak, 1987) and that mortality of released beaver is very probable due to competition,
predation and road kills as a result.
E53 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 November 13, 1998
Review and Evaluation of Control Options:
Education:
Pro's . Promotes enhanced awareness of wildlife and their habitats
. Often provides cost effective solutions
Cons . Does not always provide immediate solution to problem
. Solutions to problems may be complex
. May require lifestyle changes by public
Habitat Modification:
Pro's . Best option for public acceptance
. Prevents recurrence of problem by other animals (vacuum effect)
. Very Humane
Con's . Not always possible
. May be very expensive and unfeasible on a large scale
. May conflict with other goals and policies,
Prevention\Exclusion:
Pro's . Very Humane
. Prevents recurrence of problem by other animals (vacuum effect)
. Publicly acceptable
Con's . May be expensive
. Techniques limited at BCPV because of heritage preservation
. Varying degrees of effectiveness
Live Trapping:
Pro's . Non-target wildlife may be released
. More publicly acceptable
. No permits or licence required
. Staff easily trained to undertake
Con's . Not as effective
. Some species difficult to trap
. Expensive to purchase traps
. Moderate staff time required to set and monitor traps
. Need location for release
. Cost to euthanise animals
. Although publicly acceptable, relocation of wildlife is not humane and may
transfer problem wildlife or disease.
November 13, 1996 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/96 E54
Lethal Trapping:
Pro's . More effective than live trapping 4;>
. Some expense to purchase but less than live traps
. Relatively species specific.
Con's . Must use licenced and trained staff or contract out
. Moderate staff time required to set and monitor traps
. Publicly unacceptable
. Local bylaws may prohibit the use of leg-hold or body gripping traps
Poisons or Fumigants:
Pro's . Relatively easy to set up
. Moderate cost but less expensive than traps
Con's . Non-target species may be effected
. Dead animals may cause odour or sanitation problems
. Staff training required
. Effectiveness may vary with species and application
Shooting:
Pro's: . Very effective and species specific
. Relatively inexpensive
. Minimal staff time required
Con's . Dangerous in urban area
. Local Bylaws may prohibit firearm discharge
. Legal status of animals may require license
. Publicly sensitive issue
. Requires specialized staff training
E55 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 November 13, 1998
Wildlife Management Operating Plan
It is recommended that the Authority develop an effective response and monitor.ing system to
address human/wildlife conflicts within its watersheds. This system should apply ecologically sound
management options to minimize human/wildlife conflicts on Authority managed lands, and where
possible mitigate human/wildlife conflicts on private lands located in the watersheds under the
TRCA jurisdiction.
The following outlines the recommended operating plan for dealing with nuisance wildlife. It is
based on the process that is currently used by staff to deal with wildlife related problems and
includes three components, as follows:
1. Providing general wildlife information to private landowners as a means of
education, alleviating concerns or assisting landowners deal with common wildlife
issues/problems.
2. Response to human/wildlife conflicts on Authority managed lands and adjacent
private property.
3. Response to emergency wildlife situations.
General Wildlife Information
Staff will maintain current wildlife information for dissemination to the public. including basic biology
and information related to a range of control techniques, solutions to common wildlife problems and
information for general enquiries, High customer service standards should be developed and
maintained by designating one or several trained staff within the organization to respond to these
public enquiries concerning wildlife.
In addition staff should provide assistance in the form of adVice and management options to land
owners including information on contacting private individuals and agencies trained in the humane
removal of wildlife.
Wildlife Conflicts on Authority lands
Reporting Wildlife Problems
Wildlife problems should be reported to the Environmental Services Section by contacting the
designated staff person (Scott Jarvie, ext. 312) at the TRCA head office.
November 13, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 Ese
The following information should be provided at the time of reporting the complaint to assist in the
investigation process:
~ . Name and telephone number of the complainant
. Name of the property along with address, township, lot, and concession
. Name of the property owner (if not the TRCA)
. Name of the watercourse
. Specific directions to the property and the location of the problem (damage) at the
site
. An indication of the species involved and the type(s) and severity of the problem or
damage
Site Investigation
Upon the observation of a wildlife related problem or receipt of a complaint, staff from the
Environmental Services Section or Conservation Areas Section will undertake a site visit/analysis
to assess the extent of the problem and evaluate the specific management options that may be
applied,
In order to maintain a consistent methodology for site specific analysis of the problems, an
investigation report form has been prepared, to be completed during the visit. This form will be
used to document the type and severity of any wildlife activity observed, evaluate the problem
based on the Authority's management criteria, and recommend the most effective control option(s)
for the site, In addition, other information related to general site conditions will be included on this
form and where possible photos will be used to document each case.
Copies of completed investigation reports will be maintained on file. Reports will be circulated to
appropriate staff including the Director of Watershed Management, Zone Superintendent of the
applicable Conservation Area and the Supervisor of Enforcement and Security if specific control
actions are required.
Approval Process
Following the site investigation. staff will review the information obtained and will evaluate the
problem based on the Authority's criteria, and recommend the management options, For animal
removal, one or more of the following conditions must exist.
1 ) Immediate or future threat to human life: This could be as a result of damage (or
potential damage) to structures, severe flooding or the creation of hazardous conditions in
areas of high public use or heath and safety concerns.
2) Damage or potential damage to structures or real property: The economic impact of
wildlife activities on man-made structures is evaluated,
3) Preventative measures previously undertaken: All other options for prevention of the
problem have been considered and where possible implemented.
E57 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 November 13, 1998
4) Emergency wildlife problem: This is a situation where there is an immediate threat to the
health and safety of the public or staff due to the presence of an aggressive or injured
wildlife species, or wildlife exhibiting unusual behaviour.
If any of the criteria are applicable and animal removal is the preferred option, staff will forward the
completed Wildlife Investigation Report outlining the problem and the preferred animal removal
option to the Director of the Watershed Management Division for approval. To expedite the
process, staff will also prepare a letter of permission authorizing the action and submit it to the
Director for signature. Staff will issue a letter of permission to the complainant (if applicable)
outlining the permitted control options and any conditions that may apply. Animal removal by
qualified staff or a licensed trapper may commence at this time. In some cases, animal removal
may not be the preferred option even if one or several of the criteria are applicable, In addition to
these criteria, the option of animal removal will be reviewed based on its feasibility and anticipated
effectiveness as well as the opportunities for other preventative solutions i.e. exclusion, habitat
modification, repellents, etc,
In the case of private landowners, information outlining any action to be undertaken by the
Authority will be provided. Other information on control techniques, licensed trappers, or on wildlife
species in question will also be provided at this time,
Follow-up and Monitoring
For cases requiring animal removal, staff will conduct a follow-up of each case on TRCA land by
contacting the complainant and documenting the type. time and location of any action taken, This
will include requesting information on the removal of hazard trees, dams, dens. lodges or any
animals themselves.
If animal removal has been undertaken, the trapper involved will be required to provide the number,
age and sex of the animals removed.
Emergency Response to Wildlife Problems
In some cases it may be necessary for TRCA staff to respond to emergency wildlife situations,
These can be defined as situations where staff must act quickly in response to wildlife causing
immediate health or safety hazards to the public or staff in a Conservation Area or on Authority
managed lands, and where the animal involved is exhibiting unusual behaviour i.e. aggressive
behaviour, rabies etc.
Procedure:
The procedure for dealing with emergency wildlife problems will be as follows:
. The staff person in charg~ of the area at the time of the occurrence will evaluate the
November 13, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 ESe
situation and make any necessary decisions.
. The animal will be captured or euthanised in the most humane way possible, while
maintaining public and staff safety at all times. ...
. Wildlife carcasses will be carefully secured in a double layer plastic garbage bag and
retained for post mortem examination if required.
. Injured wildlife will be transported to an appropriate wildlife rescue or rehabilitation centre
for examination.
. Information related to the occurrence and any actions taken will be documented (General
Occurrence Report) and reported to the Environmental Services Section. Documentation
of the occurrence will include the following information:
. Date and Time
. Location (specific)
. Staff member in charge
. Detailed description of the occurrence
. Description of the actions taken
. Names of any members of the public involved
. , Staff from the Environmental Services Section will contact other agencies i.e. OMNR,
Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre, Agriculture Canada, etc, in order to
determine if a post mortem examination of the carcass is warranted,
. Carcasses not requiring further examination will be buried on site.
. A record of the occurrence is to be maintained at the location involved and at the TRCA
Head Office.
These procedures are for emergencies only, and will not be applied to recurring nuisance wildlife
situations, or as a quick fix solution to dealing with wildlife problems.
E59 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 November 13, 1998
Wildlife Management Operating Plan
Review and Approval Process
Receive and
Document
Complaint
Provi de
information on
Is Wildlife other control
Activity on Is animal options:
Authority removal Exclusion
Manaced desirable?
lands? Habitat
I Modification
I Repellents
8 8 Live TrappinC
Provide MHR
I I Contacts for
I Local Trappers
~ or direct to
Is it a Wildlife Printe Wildlife
Emercency? Control
I
8 !
Animal
Captured or
euthanized in
most humane i
manner I
Investication
and Report:
Evaluate
problem and
review criteria General
Occurrence
report filed by
staff
Criteria
applicable? I
Animal Removal
Preferred
Option?
8 Follow-up and
monitorinc
I
I I
Report to
Director of Letter of
Watershed Animal Removal Authorization
Manacement Approved? with conditions
recommendinc to Staff/Trapper
removal
November 13, 1998 PUBLIC USE ADVISORY BOARD #4/98 E60
NEW BUSINESS
Marty Brent, Manager, Black Creek Pioneer Village, provided the members of the Public Use
Advisory Board with information on the upcoming Lamplight Country Christmas program being
undertaken at Black Creek Pioneer Village. It consists of a daytime program from November 14 -
December 31, 1998, and twelve nights, every evening, Wednesday to Sunday, December 2-19,1998.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11 :43 am., on November 13, 1998.
Richard O'Brien Craig Mather
Chair Secretary Treasurer
/ks