The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWater and Related Land Management Advisory Board 1990 ~ , D-l the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes WATER AND RELATED LAND 2-MARCH-1990 11/90 MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD The Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board met in Black Creek Pioneer Village visitors Centre on Friday, March 2, 1990. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. , and welcomed all members to the Advisory Board for the year 1990. PRESENT Chairman Don Jackson Vice Chairman Lois Griffin Members Ila Bossons Lois Hancey Brian Harrison Marie Labatte Ron Moran Joyce Trimmer Chairman, Oak Ridges Moraine Working Group william Granger ABSENT Members Roger Hollander Maja Prentice MINUTES Res. #! Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THAT the Minutes of Meeting 18/89 be approved. CARRIED PRESENTATION Diana Jardine, Co-Chair of the Toronto Waterfront Charrette Steering Committee gave a slide presentation to the Board on the participants in the Charrette, how the process functioned and the ideas and recommendations that were generated. Res. 12 Moved by: Lois Hancey Seconded by: Ron Moran THAT Ms. Jardine be thanked for her excellent presentation. CARRIED 0-2 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING tl/90, MARCH 2/90 CORRESPONDENCE East Point Park Master Plan Letter from Councillor Ron Moeser of the City of Scarborough, dated February 19, 1990, requesting that the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board meeting at which the East Point Park Master Plan is presented be held in Scarborough. Res. #3 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Lois Hancey THAT staff investigate the possibility of holding a Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board meeting in Scarborough and report back to the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board. CARRIED Class Environmental Assessment Study, Main Treatment Plant Letter from Gore & Storrie Limited, dated February 19, 1990, enclosing information brief on the proposed upgrade and expansion of the Main Treatment Plant by the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, and inv iting the Authority's comment. Res. 14 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Lois Griffin THAT letter from Gore' Storrie Limited, dated February 19, 1990, be received for information. CARRIED . D-3 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING Il/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION l. TORONTO WATERFRONT CHARRETTE KEY ISSUE To present to the Authority the results of the Toronto Waterfront Charrette held on September l3-l7, 1989. Res. 15 Moved by: Ron Moran Seconded by: Ila Bossons THE BO~RD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to incorporate, where appropriate, the ideas generated by the Toronto Waterfront Charrette in the preparation of the Authority's next five year Lake Ontario Waterfront Project: 1992-96; THAT the Authority encourage the various municipal waterfront committees to take into consideration the recommendations of the Charrette in their deliberations; AND FURTHER THAT the waterfront committees, the Royal Commission on the Future of Toronto's waterfront and the Special Advisor to the premier - Toronto Waterfront Development be advised of the Authority's action. CARRIED BACKGROUND At meeting 14/89 on May 19, 1989, the Executive Committee adopted resolution 173: "THAT the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority contribute $10,000 from revenues derived from the Waterfront Development Program to the Toronto Waterfront Charrette planned for September 13-17, 1989; "AND FURTHER THAT staff be available to assist with the preparations for the Charrette including the provision of mapping, plans and photographs. " The Waterfront Charrette was a five-day event that focused on the creation of a vision for the Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront. The Charrette was co-ordinated by three founding organizations: Ontario Professional Planning Institute, Ontario Association o~ Architects and the Ontario Association of Landscape Architects. Five teams were created with at least five international experts focusing on designated areas of the Metropolitan Waterfront: . Western Beaches/EtobicOke Waterfront . Exhibition Place/Ontario Place . Port Lands/Central Waterfront . Lower Don River Valley Easte~n Beaches/Scarborough The Charrette teams' co-ordinator was Mr. Joseph Passoneau, Architect/ Engineer from Washington, D.C. The Toronto-based Steering Committee was co-chaired by Ms. Diana Jardine, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Mr. Mark Hall, Teddingtion Limited. Mr. W.A. McLean participated in the round table discussions on the Western Beaches/Etobicoke waterfront while Mr. Brian Denney was a resource person for waterfront parks. D-4 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION l. TORONTO WATERFRONT CHARRETTE contd ANALYSIS The results of the Charrette have been published. MTRCA received five copies of the document. The key findings are summarized as follows: . The waterfront should be green, clean and accessible . The waterfront, green from end to end, should be a continuous integral extension of the rest of the parks . "Cleaning" the waterfront is a regional environmental problem that will require regional solutions . The waterfront is man-made; it is an "artifact"; some of the waterfr#)nt which is most admired is landfill; we believe that further landfill is desirable to ensure greening of the waterfront . We believe it to be inevitable, and desirable, that in the future many more people will live close to the waterfront . The important thing about the Toronto Waterfront is that there is a city behind it, but access to the waterfront is difficult everywhere . The neighbourhoods along the waterfront should be a "normal" part of each city . The Transit Commission should anticipate light rail transit in both directions along the waterfront . We see Toronto's central place as spectacular: the "Harbour - Piazza", framed by the quays, the Islands and the industrial waterfront . Beyond the harbour the "spit" is a natural sanctuary that needs special protection . We take it as "given" that, between the harbour and the city centre, the Gardiner Expressway must disappear . Both public and private investment should be guided by an urban design plan; this work aims to be a first approximation of such a plan . We hope that an agency and process is soon created that can make plans and assemble the monies to implement them, which will be responsible for the waterfront from west of Etobicoke to east of Scarborough, and which will be responsible to the variety of local interests for which the waterfront exists DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The Authority will be initiating, in 1990, the preparation of the next five- year Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Project: 1992-1996 and will be evaluating in depth the inclusion of several of the ideas generated by the Charrette. In addition, the Authori ty is participating with the Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront Committee, the Scarborough Waterfront Committee, the City of Etobicoke and the Royal Commission on the Future of Toronto's Waterfront in preparing plans to ensure a future "green, clean and accessible waterfront". ---- - _.-- ~ ;l>< "3 t':l :tl ;l>< Z 0 :tl t':l t"' ;l>< Toronto Waterfront Charrette Team PORT LANOS/CENTRAL WATERFRONT WESTERN BEACHES AND ETOBICOKE WATERFRONT "3 t':l 0 Members Team leader, Joan Busquets, head of Urban Planning Team leader, Laurie Olin, landscape architect/urban designer, f;: Department, Barcelona. principal in Hanna/Olin Ltd., Philadelphia, z 0 EASTERN BEACHES/SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT Team members: Joseph Gray, director of planning, City of Team members: Andrew Lynch, architect, Lydon Lynch Ltd., :;: ;l>< Portland, Maine; Nan Griffiths, department of architecture, Nova Scotia; Jon Lucy, marine recreation speCialist, Sea Grant z ;l>< Team leader, Tom Zarfoss, Chairman of the Board, William Carleton University, Ottawa; Dan Hanganu, architect, Hanganu Marine AdVIsory Services, Gloucester POint, VA:, Mary Miss, G) t':l Benke Associates, Ohio. Architects, Montreal; William Roberts, architect/landscape artist, New York; Harriet Saperstein, head planner, Detroit :;: architect, Wallace Roberts & Todd Architects, Philadelphia. Recreation Department t':l z "3 Team members: Ann Breen, co-editor Waterfront World, ;l>< Washington, D.C.; Richard Krauss, urban designer, 0 Arrowstreet Inc., Somerville, MA:, Dr, William Smith, science LOWER DON RIVER VALLEY COORDINATOR <: H advisor, Science Council of Canada; Hennie Wolff, executive en Team leader, Thomas Wang, landscape architect, Sasaki 0 director, Visual Arts Ontario, Joseph Passonneau, architect, engineer, Washington, D,C, :tl Associates, Boston, >< OJ Team members: Ian Ferguson, chief of planning & develop- 0 EXHIBITION PLACE/ONTARIO PLACE ;l>< ment, Environment Canada Parks; David Lee, urban designer :tl 0 Team leader, Christophe Caron, urban designer, GlUM, and transportation specialist, Stull and Lee, Boston; Steven :;: Peterson, architect/landscape architect, principal Petersonl t':l Montreal. t':l Littenberg Architects, New York; Athena Tacha, sculptress, Ohio, "3 H Team members: Ray Braun, Senior Vp, Economics Research z G) Associates, Los Angeles; Ron Filson, architect, Eskew Vogt "'" Salvato & Filson, New Orleans; Helene Fried, cultural plan- ..... ning consultant, Helene Fried Associates, San Francisco; Roy "'- \D Mann, president RMAlTexas Landscape Architects and 0 Planners Inc. 0 I V1 0-6 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. ROYAL COMMISSION ON THE FUTURE OF THE TORONTO WATERFRONT -Notice of Hearings KEY ISSUE Commissioner David Crombie will be conducting hear ings dur ing the per iod Apr il 17 to May 22, 1990 on the following matters: l. A Green Strategy for the Greater Toronto Waterfront: Public Access To and Along the Waterfront and its River Valleys. - April 17, 1990 - 10:00 a.m. 2. Waterfront Transportation in the Context of the Regional Transportation System. - May 9, 1990 3. Environment and Health (continued) . - May 22, 1990 - 10:00 a.m. Res. 16 Moved by: Ron Moran Seconded by: Ila Bossons THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to make a presentation at the April 17, 1990 Public Hearing with respect to the Greenspace Strategy. CARRIED 3. IMPROVED LAKEFILL QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM -Progress Review KEY ISSUE Assessment of the achievements of the Improved Lakefill Quality Control Program during 1989 and continuation of the program for 1990; consideration of program expansion to selected inland sites in addition to modifications to the program to improve the control on material from small, untested sites. Res. t7 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Ila Bossons THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the staff be directed to continue the implementation of the Improved Lakefi11 Quality Control Program at a total budget of $750,000 to be funded from revenues generated from the program; THAT staff be directed, with respect to material from .small sites. as defined in the Manual for an Improved Lakefill Quality Control Program, to accept only suitable material from untested sites which are inspected by Authority staff prior to excavation and to place such material in areas where it is not in direct contact with water, and this requirement be implemented effective May 1, 1990; THAT the staff be directed to meet with area municipalities, the Ministry of Natural Resources, the Ministry of the Environment and the regional municipalities to investigate the need for a program by The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to assess the quality of surplus fill material being placed in inland locations within its jurisdiction, where contaminants could be released to groundwater and surface water; AND FURTHER THAT the staff be directed to prepare a report to the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board concerning the need for such a program, the legislative basis for such an initiative and the funding requirements. D-7 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 3. IMPROVED LAKEFILL QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM -proqress Review contd Amendment 11 Res. 18 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Ila Bossons THAT the City of Toronto be asked to inform the Authority what they are proposing to do with regard to disposition of the soil generated within the city boundary, and what action the City of Toronto is taking to set up sites to accommodate such disposition. AMENDMENT 11 WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED Amendment 12 Res. t9 Moved by: Joyce Trimmer Seconded by: Marie Labatte THAT the fOllowing paragraph be add~d to the main motion: AND FURTHER THAT municipalities be asked to identify locations within their municipalities for disposal thereof. AMENDMENT 12 WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS ...............................CARRIED BACKGROUND MTRCA developed the Improved Lakefill Quality Control Program in 1988 at the request of the Ministry of the Environment to respond to a concern about the quality of material being utilized in lakefill. The program has resulted in substantial improvements to the handling of surplus fill material in the Metropolitan Toronto area as summarized in the report entitled "A Comprehensive Review of the Improved Lakefill Quality Control program - 1989", Appendix WR.l. One component of the program whtch came into focus in 1989 was the disposal of surplus fill from "small sites" or those sites generating from one to nineteen truck loads. As a result of a decision by the Toronto Harbour Commissioners, as operators of the largest lakefill location, the Leslie Street outer headland endikement project, to only accept clean fill suitable for "open water disposal", all untested fill was rejected with no alterna- tive disposal location being provided. At its meeting 14/89, the Authority directed staff to not accept surplus earth f~ll from untested sites at the Authority's waterfront projects. The issue of the disposal of untested excavated material from "small sites" was re-opened at Authority meeting 115/89 held on July 28, 1989 due to concerns expressed by the construction industry. The Authority gave the industry more time to react by passing resolution 11159 which directed staff to accept material from small untested sites, but to investigate options to resolve the difficulty of small project loads before the next dumping season (ie. Spring 1990). D-8 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING Il/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 3. IMPROVED LAKEFILL QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM -Progress Review contd Staff has completed a year-end review of the Improved Lakefill Quality Control Program and reports the following: Major Achievements of the Program . the program paid for $415,000 of additional waterfront monitoring; . testing suggests that only 8% of the material received exceeded Ministry guidelines for restricted land use; . testing was completed for 164 projects which previously would not have been tested. These projects accounted for 84% of all fill received at lakefill sites during 1989; . of the total applications received in 1989, 680,000 cubic metres of material were rejected by the program as compared to 1.36 million cubic metres of material received. Status of Existing Sites . Toronto Harbour Commission is still accepting only "open water" fill as of July, 1989; . Colonel Samuel Smith Park site is closed for earth fill; . Scarborough erosion sites are currently closed and are scheduled to open by April 1990, on a limited basis. While the program has been very successful in relation to the waterfront sites, there is a continuing concern about the disposal of not only "small site" material, but all material which is rejected from lakefill sites. RATIONALE Staff has encountered continual problems relating to some small site projects resulting in more staff time to monitor quality of fill. The chemical test results on samples from small site projects taken by Authority staff suggest improvements are required to ensure only clean fill is accepted at lakefill sites. The material rejected from lakefill sites and all surplus material generated from construction sites outside of economical haulage distances to the waterfront go to inland disposal sites. These sites are mainly private sites which range from a few loads in a farm field to huge former gravel pits with capacities for millions of cubic metres. While we-have noticed increased controls at some of the private sites over the past years, it appears prudent to have some auditing by a public agency of the major sites where potential exists for contamination of surface and/or groundwater. DETAILS'OF WORK TO BE DONE As a result of the year-end review of the program, staff is recommending the following: Suggested Improvements to the Program (at all Authority operated lakefill sites) . only earth fill meeting .open water disposal" category will be placed in the open lake; . all small sites generating fill for a lakefill location are to be inspected prior to issuance of bills of lading. Visual inspection of small site projects prior to acceptance of material 0-9 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING tl/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 4. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT: 1987-1991 -Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park, City of Etobicoke KEY ISSUE Continuation of the development program at Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park, City of Etobicoke. Res. 110 Moved by: Lois Hancey Seconded by: Marie Labatte THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the 1990 development program at Colonel Samuel Smith waterfront Park, City of Etobicoke, under the -Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Project: 1987-1991-, at a total cost of $630,000, subject to availability of funding from surplus revenues. . CARRIED BACKGROUND During 1989, an additional 3.5 hectares of new landbase was created at the Colonel Samuel Smith waterfront Park site, bringing the total land area created since June 1983 to 18.3 hectares. At the end of 1989, 93 per cent of the proposed landfill configuration outlined in the approved Master Plan had been completed. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The major development components proposed for 1990, with a brief project description, are priorized as follows: 1- Master Plan/ Boating Facilities Review The Authority is reviewing the boating clubs/marina options for the small craft harbour. The negotiations with the boating federation or, possibly, a proposal call will be carried out in 1990. Total cost to carry out this component will be $5,000. 2. Interior Shoreline Treatment Installation of a sloped gabion stone lined embankment is proposed to stabilize approximately 480 metres of the interior shoreline. Total estimated cost of this work is $150,000. 3. Storm Sewer Outfall Pond and Weir Structure The consultants, Johnson Sustronk Weinstein + Associates, have completed final design and tender specifications for the weir and oil separator at the storm sewer outfall and have prepared an estimated construction cost of $440,000. The building of this structure was a condition of approval under the Environmental Assessment Act for the Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park. The estimated budget for work to be carried out in 1990 is $320,000. 4. Site Grading Final grading of some areas of the site will be completed throughout 1990 in preparation for final landscaping, roadway and parking lot surfacing. Total estimated cost for this work is $75,000. 5. Construct Hardpoint No. 5 The estimated cost to construct the core of the north breakwater including the final armouring is $80,000. D-10 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 4. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT: 1987-l99l -Colonel Samu~l Smith Waterfront Park, City of Etobicoke contd. 6. Final Armouring The cost to install the first phase of final armouring along the outer shoreline of Hardpoint No.5 is estimated at $l50,OOO. 7. Site Servicing Design Final design of electrical, water and sanitary sewer servicing will be required in preparation for 1991 installation. Estimated cost for consulting engineering fees is $40,000. 8. Landscaping It is proposed that some of the public areas of the park can be graded ready for landscaping. Estimated cost for this initial phase is $25,000. Based on approved funding from the province and projected surplus revenues, the first five development components listed above can be completed or be underway in 1990 at a total estimated cost of $630,000. Should additional funding be made available from other sources, then one or more of the remaining development components listed can be completed. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds are available under the "Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Project 1987-199l" in series Account No. 204-. 5. COLONEL SAMUEL SMITH WATERFRONT AREA -Proposed Public Marina KEY ISSUE To provide a status report on the Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Area - Proposed Public Marina Res. III Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Lois Hancey THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to suspend further consideration of a public marina and to negotiate with the Sam Smith Boaters Federation to make a proposal for development of the boating facilities by a club for further consideration by the Authority. CARRIED BACKGROUND At meeting 110/89, the Executive Committee adopted resolution 1199: "THAT staff proceed with the preparation of an environmental assessment . including public consultation on the proposed public marina in accordance with the condition imposed by the Honourable James Bradley on June 12, 1989: "AND FURTHER THAT the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, Parks and Property Department and the City of Etobicoke, Planning Department be so advised." The Authority also had a request from the City of Etobicoke to designate Colonel Samuel Smith Park as the yachting centre for the 1996 Olympics. At meeting #3/89, May 12, 1989, the Authority adopted resolution #98: D-ll WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING .1/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 5. COLONEL SAMUEL SMITH WATERFRONT AREA -Proposed Public Marina contd "THAT the Toronto Ontario Olympic Committee, the City of Toronto and Metropolitan Toronto be advised that the Authority would be pleased to participate in further discussions of the Western Beaches as a site for the Olympic rowing course and Colonel Samuel Smith Park as a site for the yachting centre; "THAT early in the discussions, the Authority will make clear the concerns we have; "AND FURTHER THAT the City of Etobicoke Council and the Toronto Ontario Olympic Committee be asked to provide further information with respect to the detailed requirements for a yachting centre at Colonel Samuel Smith Park and specifically identify the constraints that such a use would place on the Authority's planned public marina in that location." At time of writing, further information on the detailed requirements for a yachting centre at Colonel Samuel Smith Park has not been forwarded to the Authority. In accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Assessment Act, the Authority held a public meeting on January 22, 1990 at the Lakesho(e Campus, Humber College Auditorium, to review the alternatives to the undertaking (public marina) and obtain public comment. At the public meeting, the Authority presented two plans; 1) the Master Plan as approved by the Environmental Assessment Board, 1980 and 2) the Marina Master Plan, January, 1990. In addition, the Authority distributed a community questionnaire to be returned by February 9, 1990. A total of 125 people registered at the public meeting. As of February 19, 1990, 49 responses to the questionnaire have been received. The following is a summary of the public opinions: STRONGLY SOMEWHAT NO OPINION SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE AGREE DISAGREE DISAGREE 1980 APPROVED 35 4 0 1 1 PLAN (BOAT CLUB) PUBLIC MARINA MASTER PLAN PLAN/90 9 0 0 3 37 A total of 35 people indicated they strongly agreed with the 1980 Approved Master Plan (boat club) while only 9 strongly agreed with the Public Marina Master ~lan, January, 1990. During the public meeting presentation, it was clearly indicated that the Authority would consider proposals from either registered companies or boating clubs, with the proposals to be evaluated on a number of important requirements, including the following: . Public access along the shoreline . Public facilities . Quality of the Master Plan . Dock capacity and layout 0-12 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING tl/90. MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 5. COLONEL SAMUEL SMITH WATERFRONT AREA -Proposed Public Marina contd . Financial guarantees including letters of credit . Experience of the principal investors and management . Timing for implementation of the master plan . Degree of financial self-sufficiency (1. e. limi ted further investment by the Au thori ty) . Financial return to Metropolitan Toronto The overwhelming majority of people at the public meeting preferred the boat club concept to the public marina concept. The Sam Smith Boaters Federation indicated willingness to form a boat club at Sam Smith from those on the Authority's waiting list. I twas ag reed that a letter would be sent to all boaters on the Authority's waiting list advising them of the Sam Smith Boaters Federation. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff has reviewed the results of the public meeting with Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department who support pursuing the boat club concept with the Sam Smith Boaters Federation on the same basis as previous negotiations with other clubs on Toronto's waterfront. The City of Etobicoke has been advised of the Authority direction. The Authority will give the boat club approximately two months to establish their membership. MTRCA will then set out the guidelines for the boat club development and request them to produce a master plan for Authority, Metropolitan Toronto and Etobicoke review. Approximately four months would be required for this task. FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS No further environmental assessment approval would be required for a boat club. The provision of improved public access and public facilities as part of the boating basin development remains an objective of the City of Etobicoke, the Authority and Metropolitan Toronto. The boat club concept does, however, have strong community support as indicated at the public meeting on January 22, 1990. Spokesmen for the Federation indicated that public access along the shoreline could be accommodated in a club proposal. The possibility exists that the Authori ty, after approximately six months of negotiation with the Sam Smith Boaters Federation, may be recommending pursuing the public marina concept and initiating the continuation of the environmental assessment if the club's master plan does not meet the guidelines or if the boat club(s) are unable to organize the membership to ensure a sound financial base. D-13 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '1/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 6. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL , SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1987-l991 -Remedial Works adjacent to Nos. 33-85 Fishleigh Drive, City of Scarborough, Lake Ontario Shoreline KEY ISSUE To continue with the construction of the erosion control works along the Lake Ontario shoreline adjacent to Nos. 33-85 Fishleigh Drive in the City of Scarborough. Res. ,l2 Moved by: Ron Moran Seconded by: Ila Bossons THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the third phase of the construction of the erosion control works adjacent to Nos. 33-85 Fish1eigh Drive, City of Scarborough, under the Project for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto: 1987-1991, at a total cost of $300,000. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Meeting #3/88 held on May 6, 1988, the Authority, under resolution .78, approved the Fishleigh Drive Erosion Control Project at a total estimated cost of $1,840,000, with the first phase of construction budgeted at $200,000. In 1989, the second phase of the construction was approved at $200,000. During 1988, the Authority built the access road down the Fishleigh Ravine and 50m east along the shoreline. In addition, we erected our work compound at the head of the ravine and demolished the easterly low lift building located at the mouth of the ravine, as per our agreement with the Metropolitan Works Department. In 1989, the Authority completed the access road along the shoreline and constructed 50m of the revetment core. In addition, the westerly low lift pumping station building was demolished and protection given to an active drain which discharges through the building to the lake. In 1989, MTRCA received approval to charge a fee of $lO.OO per truck load for fill, to help offset the additional site operation expenses associated with implementing the Improved Lakefill Quality Control Program. Since progress at projects of this nature generally depends on the availability of fill, we must be sensitive to the trends and economic climate in the industry. If there is not enough fill available, staff may decide to waive the fee to encourage contractors to the site. In this case, the Lakefill Quality Control Program would continue as a cost of the project. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE In 1990, the Authority proposes to extend the core and begin the armouring of the ~evetment. We have budgeted $300,000 for 1990 and have apportioned the funds as follows: Access maintenance and site controls $ 30,000 Armouring 100m of the revetment 180,000 Extension of the core and backfilling the zone between the core and the existing shoreline 90,000 TOTAL $300,000. ------- ------- FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for this project will be available under the Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization Project for Metropolitan Toronto: 1987-1991, Account No. 138-l4-000. D-14 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 7. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL , SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1987-l991 -Kingsbury Crescent, City of Scarborough KEY ISSUE Continuation of the construction of shoreline erosion control works at KingSbury Crescent, City of Scarborough. Res. 113 Moved by: Ron Moran Seconded by: I1a Bossons THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the next phase of construction of the Kingsbury Crescent Erosion Control Project in the City of Scarborough at a total cost of $300,000., CARRIED BACKGROUND Construction of shoreline erosion control work along the KingSbury Crescent sector of the Scarborough Bluffs has been ongoing since 1980; however, delays in finalizing property agreements resulted in no construction activity for the period 1982-l986. To date, a total of $714,000 has been spent on design studies, construction of approximately 27l metres of offshore armoured revetment and slope stabilization work at 25-27 Kingsbury Crescent. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE During 1990, staff proposes to construct an additional 150 metres of offshore armoured revetment. Construction and supervision will be carried out by Authority field staff utilizing the annual equipment supply contractor. The supply and delivery of quarry stone will be tendered in accordance with the Authority's purchasing policy. FINANCIAL DETAILS The total budget to carry out the 1990 erosion control works is $300,000. The cost estimates for the various components of work are: Labour $ 25,000 Material $ 80,000 Equipment $130,000 Miscellaneous & Legal $ 65,000 Total Budget $300,000 Funds are available for the Kingsbury Crescent Erosion Control Project under Account No. 134-0l. 8. BELLAMY RAVINE EROSION CONTROL PROJECT -Progress Report and 1990 Work Program KEY ISSUE To complete the construction of the erosion control works in Bellamy Ravine, City of Scarborough. Res. 114 Moved by: Ron Moran Seconded by: Ila Bossons THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the last phase of the construction of the erosion control works for the Bellamy Ravine Project, in the City of Scarborough, at a total estimated cost of $100,000. CARRIED D-l5 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 8. BELLAMY RAVINE EROSION CONTROL PROJECT -Progress Report and 1990 Work Program contd BACKGROUND At Meeting #3/85, held on March 29, 1985, the Authority by resolution #46 approved Addendum No. 1 to the Bellamy Ravine Project at an estimated cost of $2,500,000. Construction began in May of 1986 and was expected to take four to five years to complete, depending on the availability of fill material. In 1986, the Authority completed the property negotiations and were able to establish our work compound, upgrade the access to facilitate heavy construction traffic, complete the channel improvements in the Upper Ravine and begin the major filling proposal required in the lower ravine. In 1987, good progress was made with the filling operation and 200m of the middle channel was completed. In 1988, the ravine invert was raised to the design grade along its entire length, and the slope buttressing begun on the easterly side of the ravine. Last year saw the completion of the channel and the slope buttressing on the east side of the ravine. In addition, the majority of the slope buttressing work on the west side of the ravine was completed. To date, some 100,000 trucks have entered the site and approximately 700,000 m3 of fill have been placed. In 1989, MTRCA received approval to charge a fee of $10 per truck load for fill to help offset the additional site operation expenses associated with implementing the Improved Lakefill Quality Control Program. Since progress at projects of this nature are generally dependent on the availability of fill, we must be sensitive to the trends and economic climate in the industry. If there is not enough fill available, staff may decide to waive the fee to try and encourage contractors to the site. In this case, the Lakefill Quality Control Program would continue as a direct cost of the project. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE In 1990, the Authority plans to complete the slope buttressing on the west side of the ravine, finish the armouring of the headland associated with the channel outfall, establish a turf cover on the remaining slopes, carry out planting and the required clean-up. The estimated cost to carry out this work is as follows: 1. complete the armouring of the headland $ 30,000 2. Complete the slope buttressing on the $ 25,000 west side of the ravine 3. Establish a turf cover and revegetation $ 20,000 4. Clean-up and restoration $ 25,000 Total $100,000 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for this project are available under the Authority's Erosion Control Program, Bellamy Ravine Project, Account No. 111-01-000. , 0-16 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 9. KEATING CHANNEL DREDGING PROJECT -Flood Control Program, City of Toronto KEY ISSUE Continuation of the dredging program in 1990 for the Keating Channel, City of Toronto Res. Il5 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Brian Harrison THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the 1990 Keating Channel Dredging Program, City of Toronto, be undertaken by the Toronto Harbour co.missioners as agents for The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, at a total estimated cost of $325,000; AND FURTHER THAT the Authority continue environmental monitoring of the dredging operation and capping design study for Cell 1 of Tommy Thompson Park at a total estimated cost of $75,000. CARRIED BACKGROUND Dredging of the Keating Channel commenced on July 26, 1987 after a lengthy approval process and completion of the modifications to the dredged material disposal facility at Tommy Thompson Park. A total of 3l8,OOO cubic metres of material have been dredged from the Keating Channel to date, at a total project cost of $3.46 million, which includes all costs associated with modifications to the endikement cell entrance and environmental monitoring. This cost is shared equally under a three party agreement by the Toronto Harbour Commissioners, Transport Canada and The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The key component of the 1990 program will be the continuation of the Keating Channel dredging to the final design dimensions, and disposal of the material at Endikement Cell Two within Tommy Thompson Park. Monitoring of the dredged material, as well as sediment sampling and analysis within and around the disposal facility, will continue in 1990 in accordance with the environmental assessment approval. Monitoring of the endikement cell entrance and silt curtain efficiency will be carried out as well. In addition, all bio-accumulation studies are expected to be completed in 1990 in order that a recommendation to the Ministry of the Environment can be made on the final capping design and usage for Endikement Cell One. FINANCIAL DETAILS The estimated cost to complete the 1990 dredging project is $400,000. Funds are available under the Flood Control Program in Account No. 112-20. FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS Results of the 1987 and 1988 Keating Channel dredging monitoring support the conclusion that the disposal of the sediment is well contained within Tommy Thompson Park and has minimal impact on the aquatic environment outside the disposal cells. D-17 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION lO. FUTURE LAND USE -Lands located between l3th and 23rd Streets, south of Lakeshore Boulevard, City of Etobicoke KEY ISSUE To report on the Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront Committee's recommendation on the future land use of the lands located between 13th and 23rd Streets, south of Lakeshore Boulevard, City of Etobicoke, which includes lands owned by Metropolitan Toronto, Ministry of Government Services, Humber College and The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Res. Il6 Moved by: Ron Moran Seconded by: Ila Bossons THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Authority support the comments and recommendations contained in the report by the Deputy Commissioner, Planning and Development, Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department, on the -Future Land Use of the Lands Located Between 13th and 23rd Streets, south of Lakeshore Boulevard, City of Etobicoke-, and considered by the Metropolitan waterfront Committee on February l6, 1990, relating to ensuring that the regional open space and recreation needs for this sector of the Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront are met as part of the planning for the publicly owned lands within the study blocki AND FURTHER THAT the province of Ontario, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, the City of Etobicoke, the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront and the Special Advisor to the Premier - Toronto Waterfront Development and Humber College be so advised of the Authority's recommendation. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1980, the Environmental Assessment Board approved the Colonel Samuel Smith Master Plan which included the following description of the undertaking: "The Colonel Sam Smith Waterfront Area will provide 70.5 acres (28.5 ha) of recreational/educational park space on the Etobicoke waterfront, located south of Lakeshore Boulevard near Kipling Avenue with 48.5 acres (19.6 ha) of the park consisting of landfill extending approximately 1,SOO feet (457.2 m) out into Lake Ontario. The land base of the park adjoins lands occupied by the Lakeshore Campus of Humber College, the Lakeshore pSYChiatric Hospital, and the Metropolitan Toronto Works Department. It will include an artificial swimming lake, mooring facilities for 500 boats, an amphitheatre, environmental gardens and educational display areas, a fitness trail, sunbathing beaches, and passiye areas for picnicking and viewing, for both local and regional visitors of all ages." On May 31, 1985, the Authority approved the "Hazard and Conservation Land Acquisition Project within the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, April, 1985". ,The properties identified in the project included the former Lakeshore psychiatric Hospital (approximately 64 acres) owned by the Ministry of Government Services. This identification was based on the characteristics of the property "as a major component of the Authority's waterfront program". At its meeting *9/87, the Authority approved, after negotiations with the Ministry of Government Services, the purchase of approximately 33 acres. In his report to the Metropolitan Waterfront Committee, on February 16, 1990, the Deputy Commissioner of Planning and Development for the Metropolitan Toronto Parks and property Department made the following conclusions with respect to the study block: D-l8 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING Il/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION lO. FUTURE LAND USE -Lands located between l3th and 23rd Street, south of Lakeshore Boulevard, City of Etobicoke contd. . The site is a key component of the Metropolitan Waterfront Plan with respect to the Etobicoke Sector. . In this area, the plan will probably have to focus on major nodes, with interlinkages perhaps having to be achieved utilizing existing residential streets rather than the water's edge. . In this context, it is important that frontages adjacent to major transportation routes be broad to provide and retain inviting vistas to the lakefront. It is only through such retention that Etobicoke citizens will be fully aware of the Lake orientation of the municipality. . The site is central to an area undergoing significant change with an associated population increase. . The guidelines for development for the study block were established in 1984 without knowledge of the phasing out and redevelopment of the Goodyear site, or the development activity now being contemplated throughout this area. . The impending intensification of use of the R.L. Clark Water Filtration Plant lands will negate some existing uses and longer term interim uses contemplated in the past. . The best utilization of the existing former Lakeshore Psychiatric Hospital buildings is probably for educational purposes by Humber College. . There is, by locally-defined standards, a critical deficiency of public open space in the area. There may well be requirements for other education or institutional uses requiring a land base relative to the expanding population. . In this context, it is premature for government to undertake a housing initiative, as it appears that such initiatives are underway within the private sector. Present indications are that a due portion of such developments will provide for affordable housing. . The land is publicly-owned and should remain in public ownership until such time as it is established that all public requirements for the area have been met. The report concluded "that at this time it is important that these lands be reserved for the future use for educational, institutional and public open space purposes". The report also notes that "The Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront recommends that the heritage values of the Lakeshore Psychiatric Hospital and associated grounds should be preserved by using the site for compatible institutional, cultural and recreational purposes". The report then made the following recommendation to the Metropolitan Waterfront Committee: "I t is therefore concluded that your Committee can now recommend that the Metropolitan Council: 1 ) endorse the recommendation of the Royal Commission on the Future of Toronto Waterfront with respect to the study block; 2 ) request the City of Etobicoke to similarly endorse such recommendations; 3 ) request the Province of Ontario, Humber College, the City of Etobicoke, the respective Boards of Education, and others to enter into discussions D-l9 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 10. FUTURE LAND USE -Lands located _between 13th and 23rd Street, south of Lakeshore Boulevard, City of Etobicoke contd. with Metropolitan Toronto to find an appropriate basis for the implementation of the Royal Commission's recommendation, which process should provide for public input; and 4) request the Province of Ontario and Humber College to hold their joint development application with respect to portions of the study block in abeyance pending resolution of the above." RATIONALE The Colonel Samuel Smith Master plan (approved 1980) and the designation to acquire the entire Ministry of Government Services lands (64 acres) c l':H ly supports the report of the Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department. This report identifies the need for greater public open space/recreation lands than would be provided on the Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park and one-half of the Ministry of Government Services lands (former Lakeshore psychiatric Hospital lands). The Authority Master Plan for Sam Smith recognized that the park alone was not sufficient to meet recreational needs, and resolved this by utilizing part of the R.C. Clark Filtration Plant for public parking to support the regional park and proposed playing fields/amphitheatre on lands owned by Humber 'College. It was foreseen that the Sam Smith Waterfront Park, the associated parking on Metro Works Property and the recreational uses on Humber College lands, when combined with the entire Ministry of Government Services lands, would provide the open space/recreational needs of this sector of the Etobicoke and Metro Toronto Waterfront. It was for this reason that the Authority included the entire Lakeshore psychiatric Hospital lands in its acquisition project. With the present Sam Smith Master Plan, the accelerated R.L. Clark water filtration plant expansion and the proposed housing development (MGS/Humber College lands), the open space/recreational opportunities as set out in the original plans for this sector of the waterfront are substantially reduced. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE upon approval of the recommendation by Metropolitan Council, staff of the Authority would be available to provide input to the discussions on the open space/recreational needs of this sector of the waterfront within the study block. 11. OAK RIDGES MORAINE COMPLEX -Interim Environmental Planning Guidelines KEY ISSUE The preparation of environmental guidelines for use by municipalities on lands within the Oak Ridges Moraine Complex. Res. 117 Moved by: Ron Moran Seconded by: Ila Bossons THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Interim Environmental Planning Guidelines for the Oak Ridges Moraine, March 2, 1990, Appendix WR.44, be approved for circulation to the member and local municipalities for review and comment; THAT the Ministers of Natural Resources and the Environment be requested to give consideration to those guidelines which affect their prograa interests; D-20 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING Il/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION ll. OAK RIDGES MORAINE COMPLEX -Interim Environmental Planning Guidelines contd. THAT the Interim Guidelines be forwarded to Mr. Ron Kanter, M.P.P., as input to his work in developing a Greenlands Strategy for the Greater Toronto Area; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to report back to the Authority on the responses received and provide a detailed identification of the financial implications of implementation. CARRIED BACKGROUND At its meeting *7/88, held October 28, 1988, the Authority resolved: "THAT A Greenspace Plan for the Greater Toronto Region be received, Appendix AM.66, as appended to the Authority minutes, and adopted as a guide to supplement the watershed Plan (1986); "AND FURTHER THAT A Greenspace Plan for the Greater Toronto Region be submitted to the Province of Ontario, councils of the Authority's member municipalities, interest groups, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation and neighbouring conservation authorities for consideration and support, and that these agencies be advised that representatives of the Authority would be prepared to make a presentation to them." The Greenspace Strategy resulted from the Authority's concern that certain renewable resource management issues are not being given sufficient recognition in a period of rapid urbanization and, further, that the achievements of the past, to ensure the integrity of the watershed systems, are at risk, given the high land values that have accompanied this growth. The principles of the Strategy are: A. to plan with our renewable resources, recognizing the headwaters, river systems and waterfront as community resources which, as Greenspace, both support a healthy ecosystem and contribute to the quality of life across the Greater Toronto Region; B. to recognize that management of the land, whether in private or public ownership, makes a difference to the conservation of renewable resources, and to encourage best management programs, education, demonstration and recognition; C. to continue selective acquisition of those lands which are particularly significant resource areas to ensure they are conserved in perpetuity and, where appropriate, to make them available for public use. The response of the Authority's member and local municipalities has been very supportive of the principles addressed by the Strategy. One of the initiatives, recommended in the Strategy, is to address renewable resource management issues in the Oak Ridges Moraine Complex, a physiographic area where no integrated programs or policies have been adopted. In responding to this proposed strategy, affected member and local municipalities have requested specific guidelines and technical criteria to assist in planning with the resources of the Moraine. Interim Environmental Planning Guidelines have, therefore, been prepared for consideration and discussion, and are appended. D-2l WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING Il/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 11. OAK RIDGES MORAINE COMPLEX -Interim Environmental Planning Guidelines contd RELATED ACTIVITIES The Province of Ontario has responded to the Authority's Greenspace initiative with the appointment of M.P.P. Ron Kanter to "Develop the Greater Toronto Greenlands Strategy;" to "identify plans to protect in perpetuity the river valleys and headwaters of Lake Ontario in the Greater Toronto Area"; and to recommend a "greening strategy to protect the natural landscape along the waterways from the Oak Ridges Moraine to the Lake". Mr. Kanter is expected to report by June, 1990. This appointment has focused greater public and political interest on Greenspace resources and, it is hoped, will assist in accomplishing the goals and objectives identified in the Authority's Strategy. Authority participation in the Kanter assignment has included the identification of Authority interests and recommendations; participation in workshops; presentation of the Greenspace Strategy; and tours to illustrate the cd tical issues requiring action. The Interim Environmental Planning Guidelines for the Oak Ridges Moraine can provide further input to Mr. Kanter's review and, it is hoped, form the basis for an integrated approach across the Moraine. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The development and adoption of specific environmental planning guidelines for the Oak Ridges Moraine by affected municipalities will greatly assist the Au thod ty in achieving the renewable resource management objectives identified in the Greenspace Strategy. The effective implementation of the guidelines will also place financial requirements on the Authority and its funding partners in the following areas: 1. data collection and studies to ensure an adequate information base for technical decisions related to Environmentally Significant Areas, floodplain and fill regulation, groundwater recharge and discharge, riparian habitat, and forestry resources; 2. input and review for the development and approval of Resource Management Plans and subsequent Conservation Plans, as well as the establishment of management agreements for specific areas; 3. land acquisition; 4. implementation of a private land stewardship program. The guidelines themselves will not address all of the objectives ident ified in the Greenspace Strategy and require a comparable commitment to improved land management practices and to the acquisition of those significant lands which are critical to resource conservation. The financial implications of these requirements were identified and included in the projected costs of the Greenspace Strategy. They will require detailed estimates to ensure staff and information resources are available to participate in all aspects of the implementation of the Interim Environmental Planning Guidelines and related initiatives. D-22 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION l2. DUFFIN CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT STUDY KEY ISSUE The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is proceeding with its second watershed management study on the Duffin watershed to be completed by mid-199l. Res. Il8 Moved by: Ron Moran Seconded by: Ila Bossons THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff proceed with the Duffin Creek Watershed Management StudYi AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to seek the additional funding required to complete the necessary study components. CARRIED BACKGROUND Over the past three years, MTRCA has completed a strategic planning exercise to establish long term goals in fulfilling its mandate. The MTRCA's Greenspace Plan for the Greater Toronto Region (1988) is a strategy to manage the resource base within its jurisdiction in a more pro-active fashion. The Greenspace Strategy is founded on the development of comprehensive watershed management strategies for each of MTRCA's nine watersheds. The Rouge River watershed was the first comprehensive basin management strategy (CBMS) to be completed. The CBMS for the Rouge River watershed was a set of policies and implementation actions to manage the watershed as a healthy ecosystem. This ecosystem approach not only integrated the land, water, biological and human features of the watershed, but also attempted to unite the interests of provincial and municipal agencies and non-governmental organizations through a multi-agency planning exercise. A committee of these stakeholders participated in setting a long term vision for the Rouge River and developing the policies and implementation actions based on a series of state-of-the-art technical studies. MTRCA has recently embarked on a'similar study for the Duffin Creek watershed. This watershed is, perhaps, the most rural of the nine watersheds in the Authority's area. With the current pressures for development (e.g. waste disposal, airport development and affordable housing), it is critical that an integrated watershed management plan be developed as soon as possible. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONB MTRCA staff has determined a critical path that will be used for this study to co-or9inate the three study components: public consultation, technical studies and a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) support project. Public consultation is expected to play an even larger role in this study in light of the controversial issues within the watershed (including the Seaton Affordable Housing Project and the proposed airport). The technical framework for the Duffin Creek study will be based on land use scenarios (existing, committed, planned development and future development) that will enable agencies to evaluate the potential impacts of development in the watershed. The GIS project will provide support to the public consultation and technical studies components through information management, spatial data coordination and management alternative testing. The anticipated completion date for the Duffin Creek study is mid-l991. The study will focus on public consultation as a means to achieve the level of commitment necessary to implement the management actions required to ensure that the Duffin watershed remains in a healthy ecosystem state. MTRCA will act as the project manager for the study and, through a two way consultation process with stakeholders, develop the vision, policies and D-23 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '1/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 12. DUFFIN CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT STUDY contd. implementation actions. Stakeholders, consisting of government agencies, non-government and private sector organizations, will be organized into a number of working groups to develop management actions for major issues on the watershed. Issues may include groundwater, water quality, fisheries and terrestrial resources. The technical studies and a group of experts will provide support/direction to the working groups. The technical studies will focus first on an assessment of the Rouge study findings and their application to the Duffin, then follow a similar approach to the Rouge study. Sub-watershed studies will be completed on the watershed tributaries draining the Seaton lands and these results will be scaled up in an assessment of the entire watershed. A land use study (completed in 1989) provides existing land use conditions and a number of future development scenarios as a basis for the technical studies. This sub-watershed/watershed approach was found to be very cost effective in the Rouge study. Studies will focus on hydrology, runoff control, water quality, groundwater, fisheries and terrestrial resources. The GIS support program will provide: (a) an integrated database management system which can be used for both broad scale (MTRCA jurisdiction) and detailed (Duffin watershed) environmental planning purposes; and (b) a database/predictive modelling interface enabling comprehensive evaluation of the potential impacts of land use scenarios on watershed resources, linking databases to models for hydrology, water quality and fisheries. Efforts in 1989 included development of the overall study framework, public consultation process and estimated human resource requirements; completion of a land use study documenting existing and future land uses; several workshops with an expert committee to identify a preliminary scope for technical studies; and a preliminary list of stakeholders for the public consultation process. To date, staff has finalized terms of reference for collection of baseline data for the watershed and initiated discussions with several ministries, in particular the Ministry of Housing and the Office of the Greater Toronto Area regarding co-ordination and joint funding of studies on the Duffin watershed. FINANCIAL DETAILS Costs for the public consultation program and the technical studies have been estimated at $450,000 over two years, of which $50,000 was spent in 1989. The GIS support program is an optional project and the subject of a special ~unding request to the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) at a total cost of $300,000. Staff currently has a funding commitment from the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and municipalities of $150,000 through the Duffin Creek Project ,file and funding support from the Ministry of Housing (MOB) for an additional $30,000. Staff is proposing to seek a commitment for the remaining funds from several ministries, including MOE, MNR, MOH, Ministry of Municipal Affairs (MMA) and the Office of the Greater Toronto Area. FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS The Duffin Watershed Management Study presents a challenge to the Authority in implementing its Greenspace Strategy as the project manager for watershed management. For the Duffin watershed, this is particularly critical because of the complexity of issues, the long list of stakeholders and the need to co-ordinate the variety of studies being undertaken by various agencies in the watershed. D-24 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THE BOARD l3. PARKING LOT SURFACES KEY ISSUE Staff was requested to prepare a report outlining the advantages and disadvantages of various parking lot surfaces to determine which surface is the most environmentally sound and economically viable. Res. 119 Moved by: Lois Griffin Seconded by: Ila Bossons THAT tbe staff report on parking lot surfaces, Appendix WR.133, be received. CARRIED 14 . BLUFFERS PARK -Bus Service KEY ISSUE provision of bus service along Brimley Road to Bluffers Park and responsibility for funding any necessary Toronto Transit Commission improvements to the road system or operational subsidies. Res. 120 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Marie Labatte THAT tbe City of Scarborough, Metropolitan Toronto and the Toronto Transit Commission be advised that The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority would be pleased to participate in a further review of the potential of bus service to Bluffers Park, but that no funds are available for any major road improvements in 1990 or for operational subsidies. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Authority is in receipt of a'resolution from the City of Scarborough Council as adopted on January 29, 1990, as follows: "THAT the Toronto Transit Commission be advised Council conurs with the recommendation of the Director of Transportation and Planning that the Commission undertake a new operational assessment of the possibility of providing bus service to Bluffers Park; however, Council requests that all costs related to the provision of this service be borne by the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority." provision of bus service to Bluffers Park was first explored by the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) in 1986. The TTC concluded that improvements to Brimley Road, which is a Scarborough road, were required to correct the uneven nature of the road and provide a non-skid surface. In addition, speed bumps within the park (on lands owned by MTRCA and managed by Metro) would need to be removed and appropriate turning areas provided. The estimated costs of the improvements were significant, particularly for the Brimley Road section and the responsibility for funding was unclear. As a result, the matter has not progressed. The concerns raised by the Scarborough Fire Department in 1989, regarding emergency access to the park on busy weekends, brought further attention to the issue of the condition of Brimley Road. As part of the response to these issues by Metropolitan Toronto, Council asked for a report on the D-25 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING Il/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THE BOARD l4. BLUFFERS PARK -Bus Service cpntd possibility of designating Brimley Road south of Kingston Road as a Metro Road. Resolution of this issue would assist in clarifying responsibility for the access improvements likely to be required by the Toronto Transit Commission. RATIONALE The Authority has always recognized that access by public transit to waterfront parks is an important objective. The growing success and popularity of Bluffers Park has taxed the available parking severely and alternatives are required. WORK TO BE DONE MTRCA staff will meet with staff from the TTC, Metro Parks and Property, Metro Transportation and City of Scarborough to review operational requirements and constraints and determine a course of action including financial implications. Negotiations of any cost sharing arrangements would be undertaken. A report will be prepared should any further action by the Authority be advisable. lS. TORONTO OUTER HARBOUR -Water Use Study KEY ISSUE To present the results of the Toronto Outer Harbour Water Use Study prepared by Johnson Sustronk Weinstein and Associates for the Toronto Harbour Commissioners. Res. 121 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THAT the staff report on the .Toronto Outer Barbour Water Use Study. dated January lS, 1990 as prepared by Johnson Sustronk Weinstein and Associates for the Toronto Harbour Commissioners, Appendix WR.l02, be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND In October 1986, the Toronto Harbour Commissioners commenced filling in the Outer Harbour to create the land base and protected basin for a 1200 berth marina. By the spring of 1989, the Phase 1 berths (385 in total) were installed and occupied. To address the issue of the potential water use congestion in the Outer Harbour by the marina and other water use activities existing-and planned, the Toronto Harbour Commissioners retained the firm of Johnson Sustronk Weinstein and Associates. The Authority was asked to assist in the study by providing staff to undertake the Recreational Boat Traffic Surveys at two locations; 1) the harbour 'entrance to the Outer Harbour Marina and 2) the entrance to Embayment C (location of Aquatic Park Sailing Club - Tommy Thompson Park). These surveys were carried out on the weekends of August 5-7, 1989 and September 2-4, 1989. ANALYSIS The report's analysis indicates that "The proposed expansion of the marina will cause neither congestion nor pose a safety hazard to other users of the harbour." The Metro Toronto police Marine Unit mentioned "that present complaints by other Outer Harbour water users, dinghy and boardsailors all related to speeding powerboats." The recommendations in the report, Appendix WR.102, cover the following: D-26 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THE BOARD lS . TORONTO OUTER HARBOUR -Water Use Study contd . approval of all races and race courses by the Harbour Master . marking of the recreational craft water depth (access channel) along the south shoreline of the Outer Harbour (Tommy Thompson Park) . monitoring on a seasonal basis the Outer Harbour Marina boat traffic education campaign for the boardsailors . review of Power Vessel Operator's Licence Testing Procedure . installation of interpretive signage at Cherry Beach and Outer Harbour Marina for the public indicating the various use patterns . no jet-skis or similar craft be launched or operated within marina limits . preparation of a video on boating in the Outer Harbour for use in education programs consideration of the Outer Harbour use patterns in the future planning/development of adjacent lands. FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS This study was prepared to address the concerns raised by the City of Toronto Council upon approval of the Phase 1 Outer Harbour Marina (385 Berths) zoning by-law. The by-law has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board with a hearing scheduled for May 10, 1990. It is anticipated that the Toronto Outer Harbour Water Use Study will be utilized as evidence in the environmental/planning approvals for the Tommy Thompson Park Master Plan, the future planning for the Outer Harbour northshore and subsequent approvals for the Outer Harbour Marina. l6. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM AND REMOTE SENSING -Funding Proposal to the Ministry of the Environment KEY ISSUES A funding opportunity for The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to evaluate Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology for use in information management, data presentation and management alternative testing. Res. 122 Moved by: Lois Griffin Seconded by: Marie Labatte THAT -A Proposal for the Use of Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing Technology for the Watershed Management Planning-, Appendix WR.ll4, be receiyed for informationi AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board on the Ministry of the Environment's response to the Authority's request for funding assistance for this project. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1989, MTRCA initiated the Duffin Creek Watershed Management Study to evaluate development impacts on issues such as basin flooding, erosion, water quality, groundwater, fisheries and terrestrial features. The study 0-27 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 16. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM AND REMOTE SENSING -Funding Proposal to the Ministry of the Environment contd will use an ecosystem approach to develop a strategy for integrated environmental management similar to the approach used in the Comprehensive Basin Management Strategy for the Rouge Watershed. The Duffin study will consist of a public consultation program, technical studies and a GIS support program (subject to funding) to be completed by mid-1991. Since 1985, MTRCA has been interested in evaluating GIS technology to support several Water Resource Division functions, such as plan input and review, watershed management and in-house data management. GIS technology is a powerful land use planning and management tool, providing the spatial database management framework to support the integrated watershed management approach envisaged by MTRCA. GIS is typically thought of as a means of coding, storing, and retrieving data about aspects of the earth's surface. GIS, however, can also be used to manipulate data in a manner that allows the user to analyze trends, model environmental processes and evaluate possible impacts of planning decisions. It is possible for planners and decision-makers to explore a range of planning and management scenarios and to obtain an idea of the consequences of a course of action before mistakes have been irrevocably made in the environment itself. GIS also facilitates and provides the opportunity for a number of other important functions, including: . standardization of data collection; . rapid and inexpensive data manipulation, updating, and tracking; . display and integration of data from a variety of sources; . resolution of scale inconsistencies in mapped information; and . sharing of information among users. Traditionally, large mainframe GIS systems were required for many of these GIS planning activities. The recent development of mini and PC-based GIS systems has facilitated the incorporation of the technology into day-to-day planning and management activities. The Ministry of the Environment recently announced a new Environmental Technologies Program to fund proposals enabling pUblic and private agencies to develop new technologies for application in environmental management. MTRCA, in association with Geomatics International and the Universities of Toronto and Waterloo, has submitted this GIS proposal for funding to MOE under this program. D-28 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 11/90, MARCH 2/90 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THE BOARD l6. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM AND REMOTE SENSING -Funding Proposal to the Ministry of the Environment contd DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The proposal consists of the following components: establishing a centralized GIS/integrated database which will be accessible to both government and non-government agencies and which can be used for both broad scale (MTRCA jurisdiction) and detailed (Duff in watershed) environmental planning purposes; . creating a GIS/predictive modelling interface at the detailed scale enabling comprehensive evaluation of development/resource management, issues; . evaluating and purchasing the necessary hardware/software to outfit MTRCA with a GIS system for use in day-to-day operations; . a training program for MTRCA staff on the use of GIS. MTRCA would provide overall project co-ordination, funding administration and be the principal beneficiary of the study. Geomatics International, an environmental consulting firm specializing in GIS applications, would act as the prime consultant co-ordinating the technical studies. Research professionals from the Universities of Toronto and Waterloo would provide expertise to Geomatics in GIS systems research and interpretation of remotely-sensed databases respectively. FINANCIAL DETAILS The total cost of this proposal is $300,000 to be spent over a two year time frame. Of this total, $130,000 will be spent on hardware/software purchase and the remainder will be used for technical studies, research and staff training. If the project is funded by MOE, the project would be initiated in Apr il 1990. FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS Primary benefits of the project will be to support both the technical and public consultation components of the Duffin study and provide an integrated database management system for use by Plan Input and Review staff in co-ordinating the review of development proposals. BUS/BOAT TOUR OF WATERFRONT IT WAS AGREED THAT staff would arrange for a bus or boat tour of the Waterfront to follow the May 25th meeting of the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:05 p.m., March 2, 1990. Don Jackson J.C. Mather Chairman Acting/Secretary-Treasurer em ~ D-29 , the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes WATER AND RELATED LARD 25-MAY-l990 12/90 MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD The Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board met in Black Creek Pioneer Vi llage Visitors Centre on Fr iday , May 25, 1990. 'rhe Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. PRESENT Chairman Don Jackson Vice Chairman Lois Griffin Members Lois Hancey Brian Harrison Roger Hollander Marie Labatte Ron Moran Vice Chairman of the Authority Gordon Patterson ABSENT /1embers Ila l3ossons Maja Prentice Joyce Trimmer MINUTES Res. #23 Moved by: Har ie La ba t t e Seconded by: Ron ~10r an THAT the Minutes of Mee ting U/90 be apl?roved. CAHRIED CORRESPONDENCE (a) Letter from Lakefront Owners Association, dated May 17, 1990 Res. #24 Moved by: Ron Hor an Seconded by: Brian Harrison THAT copy of letter to the Honourable James Bradley, Minister of En vir on me nt, from Lakefront Owners Association, dated May 14, 1990, regarding the Environmental Management Master Plan for the former Lakeshore psychi atr ic Hospital property, unde r Orde r in Council dated June 23, 1989, be received. CARRIED (b) W&RLM Advisory Board Meeting on East Point Park r4aster Plan Res. #25 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Marie Labatte THAT a Ha te r and Re la ted Land Management Advisory Board meeting on East Po i n t Park Master Plan be arranged in the Council Chambers of the City of Scarborough, rather than in a community hall as suggested by Scarborough Councillor Ron Moe se r in a letter dated April l7, 1990. CARRIED 0-30 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL , SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1987-1991 -Proposed Slope Stabili za tion \\'orks at the rear of 8-10 Burgandy Court, City of North Yor k, Humber River Hatershed KEY ISSUE To construct slope stabilization works at the rear of Nos. 8-l0 Burgandy Court in the City of No r t h York. Res. '26 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the construction of the erosion control works at the rear of Ros. 8-10 Burgandy Court, City of Borth York, under the Project for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto: 1987- 1991 at a total estimated cost of $241,500: THAT the owners of 8-l0 Burgandy Court contribute $l5,650 towards the cost of the works; AND FURTHER THAT the owners provide permanent easeaents over that portion of their property where the works are carried out. CARRIED BACKGROUND At 14eeting #5/89, the Authority under Resolution #169 recommended: "THAT the Burgandy Court and Weston Road erosion sites be included on the erosion priority list for Metropolitan Toronto and that the y be considered for remedial works in 1990 : "THAT in the interim the City of North York carry out the slope monitoring program at Burgandy Cour t; "THAT the City of North York fund, and the Authority administer, the final engineering for the design of the corrective works at Burgandy Court; "THAT the City of North York carry out a soi Is investigation at the rear of Nos. 3030-3068 Weston Road and the results of this study be reported to the \'later and Related Land Management Advisory Board for their consideration; "AND FURTHER THAT the City of North York be so advised. " Burgandy Cour t is a small cul-de-sac running west off Weston Road just south of Sheppard Avenue. The development along Burgandy Court was constructed in 1980 and consists of single family homes. A number of the homes at the end of the cul-de-sac are located along the crest of the Humber River valley. The lots extend partway down the slope, while the balance of the va lley lands are owned by the Authority. A number of minor slope instability problems in this general vicinity were brought to the Authority's attention in 1986. In the spring of 1987, a large slope movement occurred at Burgandy Court affecting five properties, Nos. 6 through 10. A 2m high scarp, varying from 2-7 metres from the homes now exists. Golder Associates Limited, a geotechnical consultant, was retained by the City to carry out a soils investigation, which formed the basis of our report to the Water and Related Land Management Board Meeting #4/89. Golder Associates Limited has completed final engineering and we are recommending tha t the following slope stabi 1 ization remedial works be carried ou t to protect the homes. D-31 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION l. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL & SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1987-1991 -Proposed Slope Stabi li za tion Works at the rear of 8-10 Burgandy Court, City of North York, Humber River Watershed contd DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE In order to protect the homes, we are proposing to rebui Id the slope by constructing an engineered slope buttress. This work involves removal of the existing weak/disturbed material and replacing it with a compac ted free draining fill at a 3H:lV slope, complete with internal drainage system and revegetation. This alternative provides the greatest factor of safety and give s the owners a reasonable size rear yard. The estimated cost to carry out this work is as follows: Activity Cost l. Survey and Leg a 1 $ 4,500 2. Acce ss preparation and maintenance 25,000 3. Sediment con trol 4,500 4. Clearing and grubing 20,000 S. Construction of slope buttress l42,SOO 6. Restoration and Revegetation 25,000 7. Contingencies approximately lO% 20,000 Total $24l,SOO FINANCIAL DETAILS Project policy states, where private property is benefiting directly from the proposed works, tha t the owner(s) must agree to make a suitable contribution towards the cost of the works by way of money and/or lands. In this case the owners of 8-10 Burgandy Court have been identified as the benefiting owners and will be assessed $lS,650. In add i t i on , the own~rs w ill be required to execute our standard indemnification agreement, and provide a permanent easement over that portion of their property where the works are carried out. The funds for this project will be raised as follows: Private funding $ lS,6S0 Grant Supported (MNR) 124,218 Levy Supported (Metro) 101,632 Total 24l,500 Funds for this project will be available under the Authority's Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization Project for the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS The scope of work and, therefore, the cost of the recommended solution is greater than wha t wa s identified at the preliminary engineering stage. As a result, this undertaking is now subject to the Class Environment Assessment for Water Management Structures, and the project will be delayed until this is completed. l'le have, therefore, scheduled the construction to begin late summer or early fa 11 of this year and will phase the work over 1990 and 1991. D-32 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL & SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1987-1991 -Erosion and Slope Instability adjacent to Nos. 3030-3068 Weston Road, City of North York KEY ISSUE Report on erosion and slope instability adjacent to Nos. 3030-3068 Weston Road, City of North York. Res. '27 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff consider the Nos. 3030-3068 Weston Road project in the 1991 vork program under the Project for Erosion Conrol and Slope Stabilization in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto: 1987-l991~ THAT, in the interim, the City of North York carry out a slope monitoring program at the rear of Nos. 3066-3068 Weston Road~ AND FURTHER THAT the City of North York be so advised. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Meeting #5/89, the Authority under Resolution #169 recommended: "THAT the Burgandy Court and Weston Road erosion sites be inCluded on the erosion priority list for Metropolitan Toronto and that they be considered for remedial works in 1990; "TI/AT in the interim the City of North York carry out the slope monitoring program at Burgandy Court; "THAT the City of North York fund, and the Authority administer, the final engineering for the design of the corrective works at l3urgandy Court; "TI/AT the City of North York carry out a soils investigation at the rear of Nos. 3030-3068 Weston Road and the results of this study be reported to the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board for their consideration; "AND FURTHER TIlAT the City of North York be so advised." Staff has recently received and reviewed a geotechnical report from Golder Associates Limited regarding the problem at the rear of Nos. 3030-3068 Weston Road. Their findings are summarized as follows: The site is located on the west side of Weston R03d, south of Sheppard Avenue, and just north of Burgandy Court in the City of North York. Seventeen single family residential homes are located along the crest of the east valley slope of the Humber River. Signs of distress on the slope have been apparent since 1984; however, it was not considered serious at that time. More movement occurred in 1987, at the same time as the Burgandy Court failure, and the site has continued to deteriorate. Golder Associates Limited have identified two areas of concern along this reach of the valley. These problems are found in the vicinity of Nos. 3032 - 3036 and 3064 - 3068 Weston Road. The instability in the upper slopes appears to be related to fill placement, build up of water pressure within the slope and changes in the drainage patterns. The problem at the rear of 3066 and 3068 is more serious and complex as a result of coincident river 0-33 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL & SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1981-l99l -Erosion and Slope Instability adjacent to Nos. 3030-3068 Weston Road, City of North York con td erosion at the toe of the slope. Although the home~ do not appear to be in any immediate danger, the problems will only get worse if left unattended and, therefore, Golder Associa tes Limited feel tha t s lupe remedial works are required at the north end of the subdivision in the area of 3064-3068, and in the area of houses 3032-3036. The problems occurring on the slope between Nos. 3036-3064 Weston Road are minor and appear to be related to the grading associated with the subdivision. As a result, the con su 1 tan ts are not recommending works for this reach of valley slope. RATIONALE Since the homes are in no immediate danger, staff is recommending that the slope re pa i r s be car r i e d ou t in 1991, subject to budget approval. The timing of the construction would coincide with the Phase II of the Burgandy Court project and, therefore, we could make use of common access and staging areas. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff will develop the most cost effective solution based on Golder Associates Li mite d I S recommendation and prepare a project report in 1991. D-34 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 3. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL , SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1987-199l -Guildwood Parkway, City of Scarborough KEY ISSUE Continuation of the construction of shoreline erosion control works at Guildwood Parkway, City of Scarborough. Res. 128 Moved by: Mar ie Laba t te Seconded by: Ron Horan TIlE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO mE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the next phase of construction of the Guildwood Parkway Erosion Control Project at a total cost of $250,000. CARRIED BACKGROUND The $2.l million Guildwood Parkway Erosion Control Project was approved by the Authority in 1988 and construction got underway in September of the same year. By the end of 1989, a total of $553,700 had been spent on the design and construction of 270 metres of armoured revetment. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE During 1990, staff proposes to construct an additional 100 metres of revetment at a total cost of $250,000. Construction and supervision of all work will be carried out by Authority staff utilizing the annual equipment supply contractor. The supply and delivery of quarry stone will be tendered in accordance with the Authority's purchasing policy. All imported earth fill used to construct the revetment core will be accepted in accordance to the Improved Lakefill Quality Control Program. FINANCIAL DETAILS The total budget to carry out the 1990 erosion control works is $250,000. The cost estimates for the erosion component of the work are: Labour $ 45,000 Material 116,000 Equipment 80,000 Contingencies 9,000 Total Cost $250,000 Funds are available for the Guildwood Parkway Erosion Control Project under Account No. 135-01. D-35 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 4. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL & SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1981-l99l -South Marine Drive, City of Scarborough KEY ISSUE Continuation of the construction of shoreline erosion control works along the South Marine Drive sector of the Scarborough Bluffs, City of Scarborough. Res. '29 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the next phase of slope stabilization as part of the South Marine Drive Erosion Control Project at a total cost of $250,000. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1984, the Authority received the necessary approvals and funding to begin the initial stage of construction of shoreline erosion control work for the South Marine Drive design sector. A total length of 1010 metres of offshore armoured revetment was completed by 1988 at a total cost of $l.6 million. Slope stabilization and drainage control work began in 1988 and to date, a total of $584,000 has been spent on stabilizing the lower portion of the bluffs within the easterly and central sectors. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE During 1990, staff proposes to complete the final fill placement for slope stabilization as well as the granular finger drains. Construction and supervision of all work will be carried out by Authority staff utilizing the annual equipment supply contractor. All imported earth fill will be accepted in accordance to the Improved Lakefill Quality Control Program. FINANCIAL DETAILS The total budget to carry out the 1990 slope stabilization works is $250,000. The cost estimates for the various components of the work are: Labour $ 61,000 Materials 42,000 Equipment 137,000 Contingencies 10,000 Total Budget $250,000 Funds are available for the South Marine Drive erosion control project under Account Nos. l34-01 and 134-l4. D-36 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 5. PROJECT FOR EROSION CORTROL & SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1987-1991 -Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough KEY ISSUE To undertake construction of shoreline erosion control works along the Sy 1 van Avenue sector of the Scarborough Bluffs, City of Scarborough. Res. '30 Moved by: Mar ie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the initial phase of construction of the Sylvan Avenue erosion control project in the City of Scarborough at a cost of $100,000. CARRIED BACKGROUND This site is located on the Scarborough Bluffs and comprises approximately 150 metres of shore line loca ted immediately west of the existing South Marine Drive erosion control works. Of the nine properties that would ben e fit from the proposed works, two are owned by the City of Scarborough, one by the Authority and one property is vacan t. The remaining six properties are privately owned and have dwellings situated from 19.1 metres to 82.0 metres from the bluff crest. Erosion is occurring at the rate of approximately 0.88 metres per year. The Authority has completed agreements with all but one of the private property owners, whereby the Authority would receive ownership of the waterlot and beach as their contribution toward the cost of the project. An agreement has been reached with the remaining property owner and, subject to receiving all final approvals, construction can start in 1990. The Authority retained the services of F.J. Reinders and Associates to complete the engineering design for shoreline protective work for the easter ly 150 metres of Sylvan Avenue, on the basis that this sector was deemed high priority for remedial measures. The consultants have recommended a westerly extension to the existing offshore armoured revetment along the base of South Marine Dr i ve . DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE It is proposed that the existing armoured revetment along the South Marine Drive sector be extended 150 metres as the initial phase for the Sylvan Avenue erosion control project. Construct ion will be under taken by Authority staff utilizing the annual equipment supply contractor. The supply and delivery of quarry stone has been tendered and awarded in accordance to the Authority's Purchasing Po licy . All imported earth fill used to construct the revetment core will be accepted in accordance with the Improved Lakefill Quality Control Program. FINANCIAL DETAILS The total cost to carry out the 1990 erosion control work is $100,000. The cost estimates for the va r ious components of work are: Labour $ 20,000 Material $ 37,000 Equipment $ 43,000 Total Budget $100,000 Funds are available unde r the Project for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in Metropolitan Toronto 1987-1991 in Account No. 133-03. 0-37 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 6. ATARATIRI STATUS REPORT -Special Policy Area Considerations City of Toronto KEY ISSUE Approval in principle of a Special Policy Area (SPA) wa~ given in August 1989 for the entire lowe r Don Ri ve r flood plain (former MTRCA Damage Centre #1) wi th final approval to proceed in two phases, Ataratiri, followed by the remaining flood prone community by August 1991. Staff has been involved in the planning and engineering work program associated with the SPA and has prepared a status report. Res. 131 Moved by: Ron Mor an Seconded by: Roger Hollander THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the status report on the Lower Don River Special Policy Area process be received for information. CARIHED BACKGROUND At Meeting U/90 the members of the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board requested a s ta tu s repor t on the Ataratiri affordable housing project located in the lower Don River flood pla in in the City of Toronto. Ataratiri is an affordable housing initiative by the Province of Ontario and the City of Toronto. Development is proposed which will provide: (a) a minimum 7,000 residential un its (current projection 7,350 un i ts; 14,000 residents) ; and (b) 1,500 employment opportunities (current projection 2,500) including full community services. The Authority last gave consideration to this project in August 1989 when an approval in principle for a Special Policy Area was approved as follows: "THAT the request by the City of Toronto for an approval-in-principle of a Special Policy Area (SPA) designation for the lower Don Rive r flood plain be approved, subject to the following conditions: l. that the impact of flood mitigation on all surrounding areas be examined thoroughly; 2. that environmental issues be considered, including the issue of the effect of storm sewer systems on Lake Ontario; 3. that all methods to mi tigate flooding, including non-structural alternatives such as the restoration of marsh land, be considered; 4. that methods of mitigating flooding that do not necessitate the per petual dredging of the Keating Channel be considered. "THAT the City of Toronto's proposed scheduling of the SPA approval process, which expedites the planning and remedial works program for St. Lawrence Square, be accepted; "THAT staff report on the progress, conclusions and recommendations of the studies being carried out by the City of Toronto in support of the SPA request; "THAT staff further report to the Authority on what action will be required to eliminate the necessity of dredging the Keating Channel in the future; D-38 WATER AND RELATED LARD MARAGEMEWT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 6. ATARATIRI STATUS REPORT -Special Policy Area Considerations City of Toron to con td "AND FURTHER THAT the prov in ce , the City of Toronto and the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be advised that the Authority's approval of a final SPA designation - either in whole or in part - will be subsequent to the Authority being satisfied tha t an acceptable level of flood protec t ion will be achieved through specified fl ood control remedial wor k s , floodproofing measures, emergency response measures and land use planning and controls. " The Ministry of Natural Resources further indicated in its approval-in- principle that "proposed residential developmen t may have to be re- evaluated if detailed studies determined that the potential risk to loss of 1 i fe was excessive and that methods to mediate against such risk are impractical" . STATUS 1. Flood Plain Planning An SPA Technical Committee has been established to address all policy i ss ue s re la ted to the Special Policy Area process. The Committee has representatives from the following agencies: Ministry of Municipal Affairs, Ministry of Natural Resources, City of Toronto, Metropolitan Toronto and MTRCA. The Ministry of the Environment is an observer to the process. In addition, a Technical Sub-Committee has been established, with similar agency represen tation, to assist in the engineering work program a ssoc ia ted with the SPA process. Discussions have focused on the following "Principles of Policy De ve lopmen t " : (a) Leve 1 and configuration of Dike/Fill Area (b) Offsite ramifications/upstream solutions (c) Keating channel dredging (d) Minimum level of flood protection (e) Land use loca t ion s and road patterns ( f) Floodproofing measures (level of habitable floors, wet f loodproo f ing (g) In s tit utiona 1 uses (group homes, schools, etc. ) (h) Access - across site - in and around buildings/alternate exits - "safe haven" (i) Hazardous goods (j) Parking (k) Stormwater Management (l) Emergency Services - early warning - evacuations - pOlice/fire/ambulance The SPA Technical Committee has been exploring is s ue s and options associated with the above-noted items. It is recognized that the development of policy cannot be entirely separated from the analyses of flood control remedial works options. In this regard, the ongoing work of the engineering consultant is being integrated with emerging po li c y issues as it becomes available. 2. En v iron men tal Evalua tion Study Repor t The City of Toronto was granted an exemption from the requirements of the Environmental Assessment Act (EA) for the Ataratiri project. The EA was waived because of the urgent need for affordable housing, and the prompt benefits to the area resulting from the removal of industrial emission sources and contaminated soils. One condition of thi s exemption was that the City had to prepare an Environmental Evaluation Study (EES) Report indicating how the environmental concerns were to be remediated. Flood risk was one of six environmental concerns which had to be addressed in the report. D-39 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMERT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 6. ATARATIRI STATUS REPORT -Special Policy Area Considerations City of Toronto contd HTRCA has been conf irmed as a commenting agercy in the EES Report submission. The report was to be forwarded to HOE by mid-Harch; however, this date has shifted to the end of Hay 1990. The individual background environmental reports should be received by mid -Hay. An eight-week review period for the EES Repor t hds been agreed upon. 3. Flood Control Remedial Works Harshall Macklin Honaghan Ltd. , eng inee ring consultants for the City, have carried out preliminary engineering design analyses for flood control remedial works. The analyses completed to date can be summarized as follows: (a) The construction of a l.am dyke running para llel to Bayview Avenue between Fron t and Queen Streets or filling the site to a similar elevation along this eastern limIT and grading back to existing grade to provide dry, passive flood protection to the leve 1 of the 1:350 year flood. Detai Is: (i) The fill option requires the redirection of storm sewers away from the Don River, which reduces cur ren t flood suscept i b i li ty and improves overall site drainage. (i i) The 1: 3 50 year level of protection is provided only if the Keating Channe 1 is dredged in perpetuity. (i i i) In the even t that dredging of the Keating Channel is discontinued, the level of flood protection is reduced to the 1:20 year flood e ve n t . (i v) The proposed works provide flood remediation for most of the s~ill zone north and west of Ataratiri. (v) The proposed works have negligible impacts on flood levels adjacent to the Ataratiri site. (v i) Residual flood depths under regulatory flood conditions Imuld be approximately 5 metres near the Cherry Street underpass at the southern por tion of the site, approximately 3.5 metres near Front Street and approximately 1. 8 metres at the northeastern por tion of the site. (b) An alternative to the above proposal is to raise the dyke or eastern elevation of fill by another 0.7 metres. Cons truct ion beyond this level is not possible due to existing grades at Front and Queen Streets. De ta ils are as noted above, except: ( i ) The level of flood protection assuming undredged conditions within the Keating Channel would increase from the 1:20 year flood even t to the l:lOO year flood event. (i i ) Off-site impacts in flood levels are currently being assessed by the consultant. ( i i i) Residual flood depths under regulatory flood conditions are not subs tan t ially reduced. 0-40 WATER ARC RELATED LAND MANAGEMEN? ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD IlAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 6. ATARATIRI STATUS REPORT -Special Policy Area Considerations City of Toronto con td (c) The concept for the widening of the CNR bridge and downstream channel improvements was reviewed. Deta ils: (i) The bridge would have to be widened from 70 metres to 220 metres, as would the downstream channel. ( i i) The cost estimate for this work would exceed $ 50 million dollars. (i i i) The consultant was requested to examine this option in more detail; however, the results of this analysis have not yet been forwarded for review. (i v) At present, the SPA Technical Committee is assuming that the CNR bridge will remain as built. (d) The City has advised that the consultant is also carrying out a more deta i led hydraulic analysis of the CNR underpasses west of Par liamen t Street to assess the flood control benefits currently and/or potentially provided at these locations under regulatory flood conditions. Additional hydraulic analyses re la ted to overland flow routes may be examined further. The engineering studies are ongoing and, as ye t, no conclusions or recommendations have been finalized. DETAILS OF FUTURE WORK A detailed report and presentation on the flood control remedial works study will be prepared for a future meeting of the Water and Re la ted Land Management Board. A report regarding the SPA approval for the Ataratir i project is currently scheduled to be brough t forward in December of 1990. D-4l WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 7. COLONEL SAMUEL SMITH PARK -Environmental Monitoring Program KEY ISSOE A draft report of the 1988 Col. Sam Smith Environmental Monitoring Program has been prepared by staff and requires distribution to the Ministry of the En v i ronmen t for review and comments. Res. '32 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY TDAT the draft 1988 Col. Sam Smith Environmental Monitoring Report and Executive Summary, Appendix WR.2l7, be received; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to forward the draft 1988 Col. Sa. Smith Environmental Monitoring Report to the Regional Director of the Ministry of the Environment for review and comment. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Sam Smith Environmental Monitoring Program is required as a condition of the environmental assessment approval for park construction. MTRCA was directed to establish an environmental monitoring survey in the vicinity of the lakefilloperation. In response, a program was established by the MTRCA and the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) commencing in 1981. The initial year of monitoring was summarized in the Sam Smith Waterfront Environmental Monitoring Study, MTRCA (1982) . A project summary of the Sam Smith pre-construction phase (198l-1982) and the construction phase (1983 -198?) was prepared by Beak Consultants (1988) . The Sam Smith Monitoring Program includes water and sediment quality collections, benthic invertebrate collections, and SCUBA reconnaissance surveys in the vicinity of the Sam Smith Park, and studies of the intake water quality at the R.L. Clark Water Filtration Plant. In 1988, a biomonitoring project consisting of a caged clam bioaccumulation survey was implemented. \later quality results indicated that the environment adjacent to the Sam Smith Waterfront Park is strongly influenced by the quality of the nearshore Lake Ontario water rather than the active park construction, the exception being tha t par k construction during 1988 locally elevated turbidity levels at stations directly adjacent to and in close proximity (less than lSO ft. ) to the lakefilling activities. Park construction during 1988 had no discernible impac t on the quality of sediments, the benthic invertebrate community, or the bottom substrate conditions within the Sam Smith area. In general, results of the 1988 Sam Smith monitoring program determined tha t there is minimal environmental impact on the adjacent aquatic environment due to park construction. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The Sam Smith Environmental Monitoring Program will continue in 1990, as in previous years, with the following modifications to the monitoring efforts. 1. The biomonitoring study will be expanded to better identify the inputs associated with the storm sewer in the boat basin and background near shore conditions. 2. Sediment traps will be deployed within the boat basin and a near shore control station to determine the quality and qUdntity of deposited materials within these areas. 3. Thermal monitoring of the boat basin will be conducted to better understand the exchange rate between the boat ba sin and the lake. 0-42 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 7. COLONEL SAJlUEL SMITH PARK -Environmental Monitoring Program contd. Efforts will be directed in 1990 to improve the time required to report on field acti vi ties. Additional fie Id staff and a more efficient reporting of the analytical results from the laboratory will greatly enhance our efforts. 8. WATKRFRORT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1990 -Cities of Etobicoke, Toronto and Scarborough KEY ISSUE Continuation of the Waterfront Environmental Monitoring Program in 1990, City of Etobicoke, City of Toronto, City of Scarborough. Res. 133 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the 1990 Waterfront Environ.ental Monitoring Program, in the cities of Etobicoke, Toronto and Scarborough, at a total estiaated cost of $218,000. CARRIED BACKGROUND Since 1975, MTRCA has conducted environmental monitoring programs to descr ibe biological, physical and chemical conditi0ns in the vicinity of water fron t lands owned or under development by the Authority. RATIONALE Studies conducted under the 1990 Waterfront Environmental Monitoring Program are required as a condition of environmental assessment approval at Sam Smith Waterfront Park and the shore line sta bi li za t ion projects along the Scarborough shoreline. Information collected at the East Point waterfront area is utilized in the l'laster planning process and environmental assessment approval submission. Environmental studies in the remaining waterfront parks enable the Authori ty to investigate the long term conditions within established waterfront parks. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Sam Smi th Environmental Monitoring Program Studies at the Sam Smith Waterfront Park are required as a condition of environmental assessment approval. Monitoring work focuses on ensuring that park construction has min imal impac t on the integrity of the near shore environment. This study includes investigations into water quality adjacent to the waterfront park and the R. L. Clark Water Filtration Plant raw water intake, SCUBA Reconnaissance and documentation of the lake bottom, biomonitoring sediment quality and deposition, benthic invertebrate commun i ty , and thermal monitoring of the boat bas in . Waterfront Erosion Control Sites This stud Y is a comparative analysis of existing waterfront erosion control structures to areas of natural shoreline. Studies include SCUBA Reconnaissance Surveys to documen t the physical fish habitat and substrate associated with erosion control structures, ben th ic invertebrate collections and an extensi ve survey of the fish community adjacent to the remedial works and natural shoreline. 0-43 WATER AND RE!.ATED !.AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 8. WATERFRONT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1990 -Cities of Etobicoke, Toronto and Scarborough con td East Point Waterfront Park Monitoring Program Environmental monitoring of the East Point Waterfront Park area is directed at providing background information on existing conditions and loca 1 inf luences, sources and offshore current monitoring, as well as sediment quality and benthic invertebrate collections. Water front Fisheries Survey The Waterfront Fisheries Survey is conducted to compare the fish communities associated with waterfront parks to natural shoreline and river mouth marshes. Fish collected are tagged and returned to discover the exten t of fish movement along the Toronto waterfront. Collections in 1990 will duplicate work completed in 1989, to discover spa t i a 1 an d tempora 1 trends within the fish communities of the waterfront parks. Collections will be conducted wi thin Sam Smith Park, Humbe r Bay Park, Tommy Thompson Park, Ashbridge's Bay Park, Bluffers Park, East Poin t Park, and the Rouge River and Humber River marshes. Improved Lakefill Quality Control Environmental Monitoring Projects Lakefill Quality Control Program (LQCP) revenues provide funding for environmental monitoring of existing condi tions at established waterfront parks and lakefilling operations. Investigations included sed imen t , benthic invertebrate, and water quality collections at existing parks and active lakefill operations, and sediment deposition and biomonitoring surveys at active lakefill operations. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding requirements and source of funding for the 1990 Waterfront Moni tor ing Program is as follows: l. Sam Smith Environmental Monitoring Program Capital funds available in A/c 240-01 $ 82,000. 2. \vaterfront Erosion Control Sites Capital funds ava ilable in Alc 133-23, 134-23 15,78l. 3. East Point Waterfront Monitoring Program Capital funds available in A/C 222-34 41,393. 4. Waterfront Fisheries Survey LQCP revenues available in Alc 242-05 13,007. 5. Improved Lakefill Quality Control Environmental Monitoring Projects LQCP revenues available in A/C 242-06 65,8l8. TOTAL $2l7,999. 0-44 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 9. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT: 1981-l99l -Ashbridge's Bay, Coatsworth Cut Dredging, City of Toronto KEY ISSUE To carry out minor dredging within the Coatsworth Cut navigation channel at Ashbridges Bay, City of Toronto. Res. 134 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Lois Griffin THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with minor eaergency dredging in Coatsvorth Cut at Ashbridge's Bay, City of Toronto, at a total cost of $50,000. CARRIED BACKGROOND The Coatsworth Cut has been an ongoing navigation problem due to unsafe water depths and insufficient channel widths; all as a result of sediment deposition from various sources. In 1987, MTRCA dredged approximately 8,500 cubic metres of material at a total cost of $7l,OOO. Recent soundings show that siltation has again reduced the navigable waters and dredging is required to maintain a safe channel entrance to the public launching ramps and the service facilities of the boating clubs. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE To achieve minimum navigable standards, up to 2,000 cubic metres of material will need to be dredged from a 70 metre section of channel. A conventional dragline is proposed for dredging and all material will be disposed of off site at a suitable location. Prior to dredging, the sediment material will be tested and analyzed to determine an appropriate disposal location. FINANCIAL DETAILS The total budget to carry out the emergency dredying is $50,000. The cost estimates are: Labour $ 6,000 Equipment 35,000 MObilization and Demobilization 4,000 Contingencies 5,000 Total $50,000 Funds are available for the AShbridges Bay Coatsworth Cut dredging under Account No. 211-16. FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS A long term solution to the problem of sediment deposition and continuous dredging of the channel entrance is the construction of shoreline protection on the west side of Coatsworth Cut to retain future sediment accumulations. Authority staff is completing an Environmental Study Report in support of proposed remedial works for submission to the Ministry of the Environment and all other regulatory agencies. D-45 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HBLD MAY 25, 1990 , - , SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION lO. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT: 1987-l991 -Ajax Waterfront Area, 1990 Development Program KEY ISSUE Continuation of the development program at Ajax IJaterfront, Town of Ajax. Res. '35 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO TOE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the 1990 development program at Ajax Waterfront area, Town of Ajax, under the Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Project: 1987-1991-, at a total cost of $55,000. CARRIED BACKGROUND To date, substantial waterfront areas have been improved to basic park standards and transferred to the Town of Ajax for operation and maintenance. In 1990, the priority will be to extend the existing waterfront pathway system easterly to Pickering Beach Road. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The existing paved walkway will be extended easterly approximately 525 metres from McClarnan Crescent to Pickering Beach Road. Tenders will be called for the construction of the three meter wide asphalt paved walkway. FINANCIAL DETAILS The total approved budget for the 1990 development program is $55,000. Funds are available under the "Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Project: 19B7-l991" in Account No. 230.l1 ll. BLUFFERS PARK MARINA -Proposed Cruise Boat Operation KEY ISSUE A proposal by Bluffers Park Marina Limited in 1989 to build a dock to accommodate a charter cruise boat operation was approved by the Authority, but subsequently the City of Scarborough raised concerns about the potential impact. Res. 136 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Lois Dancey THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT Metropolitan Toronto and the City of Scarborough be advised that the proposal to establish a charter cruise boat operation at Bluffers Park has been suspended and that it will not be reactivated without consultation with the City of Scarborough; however, the dock proposed originally to accoamodate the cruise boat will still be built to serve only as a visitors dock where recreational boats visiting the harbour can be received prior to being directed to appropriate slips. CARRIBD BACKGROUND At Meeting #5/89, the Authority adopted resolution #174: "THAT the proposed revisions to the Bluffers Marina Master Plan, regarding construction of new docking facilities to accommodate a charter boat operation, be approved; "THAT staff be directed to prepare the necessary revised drawings as appended to the lease agreement; "AND FURTHER THAT all costs incurred in finalizing the revised lease documents be paid for by Bluffers Park Marina Limited." D-46 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMERT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 11. BLUFFERS PARK MARINA -Proposed Cruise Boat Operation contd Shortly thereafter a report by the Fire Chief of the City of Scarborough raised concerns abou t var ious fire hazards at Bluffers Park, including concerns about traffic congestion and its impact on access for fire trucks. This concern, combined with the initiatives of Scarborough's Waterfront Committee to review various waterfront issues, including the extent of local planning con trois, led to the adoption of the follow ing resolution by the Council of the City of Scarborough at its meeting on January 15, 1990: "COMfIITTEE RECOMHENDS THAT Counc i 1 express its concern to the Me tropoli tan Toronto Council and the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority regarding the impact of the introduction of the char ter cruise boat operation at Bluffers Park, and request an opportunity for consultation prior to proceeding further wi th implementation of the re la ted ag reemen t. " The resolution was forwarded to the Authority by the Metropolitan Toronto C le r k after the communication from the City of Scarborough was received by the Metropolitan Toronto Parks, Recreation and Property Committee. The proposa 1 to locate a charter cruise boat at Bluffers Park was subsequently abandoned. The operator of the boat, who had originally approached Bluffers Park Marina, decided to maintain his operation in the City of Toronto because of his assessment of market potential. Bluffers Park Marina Limited would still like to proceed with the proposed dock as they find they do not have suitable facilities to accommodate visiting recreational boats. The dock loca tion , immediately adjacent to the harbour entrance, would be ideally suited as an area where visiting boats cou ld be rece i ved prior to being directed to vacan t slips. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE As a result of the fa~tors described above, the lease has not been amended as required by the Authority resolution. Bluffers Park Marina still needs to provide the detailed drawings of the proposed dock, an amended plan of survey and documentation concerning federal government approval of the proposed dock. The involvement of the federal government is as a consequence of the federal funding of the breakwater construction and resulting ownership of waterlots. FINANCIAL DETAILS All costs of dock construction and surveys etc. asso~iated with the lease amendment are the responsibility of Bluffers Park Marina Lim i ted . D-47 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90. HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION l2. ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP -Public Amenity Scheme KEY ISSUE To provide information on the responses by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and the Minister of the Environment to the Authority's questions regarding the Etobicoke Motel Strip - Public Amenity Scheme. Res. 137 Moved by: Lois Griffin Seconded by: Ron Moran THAT the recommendation below be amended to include concerns expressed in staff report and adding stormwater management to those concernsi AND FURTHER THAT this amended reco.mendation be brought to the Authority at its .eeting on June 15. 1990. CARRIED THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Authority reiterate its support for the Etobicoke Motel Strip - Public Amenity Scheme as set out in Resolution '247. paragraphs l, 2, 5 and 6 (Meeting '8/89, December 8, 1989)i THAT the Authority support the wetland concept on the Public ~enity Sche8e as a test case for stor.water quality control and habitat enhancement, subject to the inclusion in the Secondary Plan (OPA C-65-86) of specific policies on Stor.water Management. which address the co~ents of the Minister of the Environment (January l2, 1990) as well as the Authority's comments on i.plementation and .aintenance of the wetlands; THAT the Authority acknowledge the decision of the Minister of the Environment in his letter, dated January l2, 1990, that an individual environ.ental assessment for the deflector ar. is required aud the Authority agrees to undertake such an assessment if the deflector arm is proposed in the futurei AND FURTHER THAT the reco..endations be forwarded to the City of Etobicoke, Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Depart.ent, Metropolitan Toronto Planning Department, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and the Ministry of Natural Resources. BACKGROUND At A~thority Meeting 18/89, he ld Decembe r 8, 1989, the following motions were adopted: Amendmen t II 2 Res. 11248 That clause 3 of the recommendation be amended to read: The Authority feels it is premature to endorse the deflector arm and wetlands concepts until the additional studies recommended in the Environmental Management Master Plan have been carried out; Amendment 113 Res. 11249 That the following be added to clause 4 of the recommendation: 1. What are the provincial interests along the Motel Strip and Humber Bay East? 2. What area or components of the Waterfront Public Amenity Scheme are covered by the Environmental Management Master Plan? 0-48 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMERT'ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 , - SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 12. ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP -Public Amenity Scheme contd. 3. \'lhat flexibility exists with the Public Amenity Scheme and Environmental Management Master Plan and the approval process for minor deviations, if any? In a letter from Diana Jardine, Dire'ctor, Plans Administration Branch, Ministry of Municipal Affairs, dated February 28, 1990, the province ou tl ined the following comments to the Authority's questions: 1. The deflector arm will be subject to an individual environmental assessment. 2. The province's interests will be articulated before ~he Ontario Municipal Board hearing on the Secondary Plan for the Motel Strip. The province is, however, concerned with the environment, public access and use of the waterfront. 3. The entire area covered by the secondary plan will be subject to the provisions of the Environmental Management Master plan. 4. The overall Objectives, and conditions to meet those objectives, must be maintained and any changes would require amendment to the official plan, which would be part of a public process. The Minister of the Environment, in a letter dated January l2, 1990, provided the following statement on the Environmental Management Master PlanjEtobicoke Motel Strip - Waterfront Public Amenity Scheme: "I am prepared to accept the study, excluding the deflector arm portion, as having fulfilled the plan set out in my letter of May 9, 1989 subject to the following conditions. l. That the current study be expanded prior to the development of the Motel Strip to include a more detailed stormwater management plan which provides a thorough review of: on-si te controls interim controls (in effect prior to and dur ing the development of the wetland) . monitoring of the wetland proposal 2. Implementation of study findings, including the incorporation of guarantees of public access, constraints and lake filling , restrictions in O.P.A.'s and other planning mechanisms relating to deve lopmen t in the Motel Strip area. " Official Plan Amendment C-65-86 was adopted by Etobicoke Council on February 22, 1988. It was referred to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) based on a number of Objections. The OMB has advised the municipality that a pre-hearing on the matter will be held on June 27, 1990. The pre-hearing will establish who has interest, the time period required for the subsequent hearing and the issues to be considered. t1odifications to the Secondary Plans based on the Public Amenity Scheme were presented to a public meeting held on March 20, 1990, with a further report to be considered by Etobicoke Development Committee on May 22, 1990. 0-49 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90. HELD MAY 25. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 12. ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP -Public Ameni ty Scheme contd. I-\od if ica t ions to Official Plan Amendment C-65-86 will subsequently be adopted by Council. The Authority will, through the normal circulation process, receive a copy of these modifications from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs. It should be noted that the Minister of Municipal Affairs has declared this a matter of provincial interest, and the OMB wi 11 therefore be making a recommendation to the Provincial Cabinet, which will make the ultimate decision regarding approval of the Amendmen t. The Authority has been con su 1 ted on the proposed moJification to OPA C-65-86 to incorporate the Public Amenity Scheme/Environmental Management Master Plan, including the agency comments. Authority s ta f f continue to discuss the following items with the City of Etobicoke: The proposed road alternative n~aterfront Drive) through Humber Bay East. (Note: The road is shown as an alternative in the current draft OPA presented at the March 20, 1990 public mee t ing pending the f in a I resolution of a property dispute.) How the Authority's comments on the 50-80 metres of public waterfront space, exclusive of the road, are to be achieved. The existing implementation strategy which anticipates property by property development rather than the study recommendation that, immediately upon approval of the Motel Strip Secondary Plan, all land, waterlots and riparian rights for the complete amenity scheme be negotiated with the individual owners and acquired at one time, using public funds, prior to development. In addition, the Honourable John Sweeney, Minister of Municipal Affairs, wrote Mayor Bruce Sinclair on Apri 1 6, 1990 suggesting "tha t a comprehensive overview of the broader implications of redevelopment in South Etobicoke be undertaken by the City in consultation with the Province and Metropolitan Toronto. It should also provide an overall planning context within which to review redevelopment proposals in the area", The implications of this le t te r to the Motel Strip Secondary Plan and OM!3 hearing are currently under review by the Ci ty of Etobicoke. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Authority staff wi 11 con ti n ue to work with Etobicoke Planning Department to ensure that modifications to O. P . A . C-65-86 include appropriate policies on stormwater management, an implemen ta t ion strategy and scale of the public amen i ty space based on additional lakefill and provision of additi.onal public amenity space in the adjacent private development. 0-50 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 13. FISH HABITAT REHABILITATION PROPOSAL -Trout Unlimited KEY ISSUE Under take fish habitat rehabilitation projects on Authority owned lands, including the Albion Hills Conservation Area and Bolton Resource Management Tract, by Trout Unlimited. Res. 138 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the fish habitat rehabilitation proposal on Authority lands, including the Albion Hills Conservation Area and Bolton Resource Manageaent Tract, as submitted by Trout Unlimited, be approved. CARRIED BACKGROUND Trout Unlimi ted is a national, non-profit organization established approximately twelve years ago. The group is dedicated to the protection and improvement of cold water fisheries resources. A number of chapters have been established throughout southern Ontario with special attention being focused on the Credit River. Trout Unlimited is a volunteer group and has been active in carrying out fish habitat rehabilitation projects. They have also made f inanc ia 1 contributions towards the purchase of fisheries inventory equipment and pond outlet conversions to reduce water temperatures. The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has received a request from Trout Unlimited for technical advisory assistance and permission to undertake a fish habitat rehabilitation project on Authority owned property in the Humber River watershed, north of the Town of Bolton. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Trout Unlimited proposes to stabilize eroding streambanks on the Humber River. Work will be carried out by Trout Unlimited members during organized work days. Methods to be used include log and rock rip rap, brush bundle installation and in-stream boulder placement. Logs and limbs found on the site wi 11 be used where possible. Other required materials and equipment will be provided by Trout Unlimited. Natural materials will be secured to the streambank to improve water quality by reducing erosion and sedimentation. In-stream fish habitat will also be enhanced. Staff has reviewed the proposal and is satisfied that it meets the fisheries management objectives of the Authority. During construction, the Authority would provide site supervision and assist with all tree felling. If approved, an agreement would be prepared for the project. Liabili ty considerations have been considered and would be adequately addressed in the agreement. 0-51 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD MAY 25. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 14. URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION PROPOSAL -Conservation Council of Ontario & Black Cr~ek Project KEY ISSUE Undertake a reforestation and in-stream habitat enhancement program in the Black Creek watershed in the City of North York and the Town of Vaughan to improve water quality, rehabi litate stream channels and enhance riparian and aquatic habitats in co-operation with the Conservation Council of Ontario and the Black Creek Project group. Res. 139 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT an agreement be prepared between The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Conservation Council of Ontario and the Black Creek Project on an annual basis to carry out projects to enhance riparian and aquatic habitats on Authority land in the Black Creek watershed. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Authori ty is in receipt of two proposals for rehabi li tation projects on the Black Creek: "The Urban Streams Rehabi li ta tion Project" by the Conservation Council of Ontario and "A Proposal to Initiate the Process of Erosion Control and Trail Creation" by the Black Creek Project. The two proposals aim to improve the aquatic ecosystem in the Black Creek watershed by vegetating streambanks, reducing erosion and sedimentation and wetland creation. The work, when comple ted, will result in improved water 'luality, enhanced fish and wildlife habitat and additional recreational opportunities. The Conservation Council of Ontario (CCO) is a non-profit, non-political, public service body composed of major provincial organizations and individuals interested in environmental and conservation issues. The Council is dedicated to promoting the conservation and wise use of our natural resources. The CCO recently sponsored the Water Task Force which has recently embarked on the Urban Stream Rehabilitation Project to promote the rehabilitation of Ontario's rivers and streams, using the Black Creek watershed as a demonstration project. The Black Creek Project is a citizens group formed in 1982 devoted to promoting and carrying out improvements to the Black Creek and its valley lands. Because of the Authority's long history in revegetation and sediment control projects, CCO has asked MTRCA to participate as project manager. The CCO, however, would remain the lead agency. S ta f f has reviewed the proposals and is satisfied that they are well conceived and support the goals of the Authority. DETAILS OF THE WORK TO BE DONE If approved, an agreement will be prepared between MTRCA, CCO and the Black Creek Project. Although the proposal is a three year project, Authority involvement would be on an annual basis. A budget of $620,000 would be transferred to the Authority and MTRCA staff would co-ordinate project delivery including administration, hiring, safety training and work implementation. A revegetation program within the Black Creek wa tershed is proposed. Indigenous plan t species of the Carolinian Canada zone will be favoured. 0-52 WATER ARC RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90~ HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION lS. ROUGE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY -Implementation Committee KEY ISSUE: To recommend the forma tion of the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy Implementation Committee. Res. 140 Moved by: Lois Hancey Seconded by: Lois Griffin THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy Implementation Committee .embership be composed of one representative from each of the following groups: Provincial -Ministry of Natural Resources -Ministry of the Environment -Ministry of Agriculture and Food Municipalities -Regional Municipality of York -Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto -City of Scarborough -Town of Ricbmond Hill -Town of Markham -Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville -Town of Pickering Non-Governmental Organ'izat'ions -Save the Rouge Valley System -Urban Development Institute -Conservation Council of Ontario. -Toronto Field Natnralists AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Water and Related Land Manage.ent Advisory Board when the Terms of Reference for the Implementation Committee have been finalized. CARRIED BACKGROUND On February 23, 1990, the Authority adopted r esol uti on U6: "THAT the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy, Appendix WR.445 herewith, be approved; "THAT endorsement of the goals, policies and assigned implementation responsibilities of the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy be requested from the following agencies: Provincial - Ministry of Natural Resources - Ministry of the Environment - Ministry of Agriculture and Food llunicipalities - Regional Municipality of York - Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto - City of Scarborough - Town of Richmond Hill - Town of Markham - Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville - Town of Pickering; 0-53 - , '2/90, WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION l5. ROUGE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY -Implementation Committee contd. "THAT support of the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy by the following non-governmental organizations represented on the Rouge River Stakeholders Committee be requested: - Sa ve the Rouge Valley System - U r ba n Developmen t Institute - Conservation Council of Ontario - Toronto Field Naturalists; "THAT staff be directed to establish a Rouge River Implemen ta t ion Committee to initiate and monitor the implementation of the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy; "THAT staff be directed to prepare a Rouge River Implementation Progrdm that outlines a time schedule and funding mechanism to undertake the lead agency actions assigned to the Authority; "THAT staff repor t on the question of the possible need to changes to legislation to assist in the implementation of the Rouge River s tra teg ies; "THAT staff report on how public works in the Rouge Valley will be managed and monitored to be consistent with the Rouge Va lley po li c i e s ; "AND FURTHER THAT staff report on how areas less than 130 ha. have been dealt with in the past, and the significant changes in the management of such areas as a result of the Rouge River strategies. II RATIONALE The Rouge River Basin Management Strategy recommended a number of implementation actions that provincial agencies, mun icipali ties and all bodies with special interest in the planning of the water shed are able to endorse and carry out. It is this latter requirement of ' actual actions occurring in the watershed that is crucial for the Strategy to be a highly effective and worthwhile document. For this reason, it is staff's opinion that an Implementation Committee is absolutely necessary to initiate and monitor the implementation of the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy. During the completion of the Rouge River Urban Drainage Study and the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy, a Stakeholder Committee comprised of Rouge watershed municipalities, provincial agencies and non-governmental organizations was used and proved to be invaluable in the preparation of these documents. It is these same agencies, for the most part, that were recommenc.led as the lead agencies to be responsible for carryiny out each implementation action. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Authority staff will in v i te a repre sen ta t i ve from each agency to be on tile Implementation Committee and will provide the following interim Terms of Reference to assist in guiding the work of this Committee. Assist the Authority in implementing the Rouge Ri ve r Basin Management Strategy. Establish the Terms of Reference for the Implementation Committee. rtonitor the effectiveness of the implementation actions, including the design of mechanisms for monitoring. Prepare a two-year progress repor t on the effectiveness of the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy. Recommend changes to the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy to The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. D-54 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGIlIIENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90 , HELD MAY 25. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 15. ROUGE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY -Implementation Committee con td . Staff will begin discussions with each agency to determine their representative on the Implemen ta t ion Committee and to receive further recommendations from these agencies on appropriate roles and res pon sib i li tie s of the Implementation Committee. 16. FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR MTRCA - 1983-2003 UY ISSUES Submission of a Forest Management Plan for The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authori ty by the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) wh i ch out lines the objectives and strategies for managing MTRCA forests for the period 1983-2003 and provides specific forest operations necessary to meet the stated g oa 1 s for a five-year term. Res. In Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS ~ THE AUTHORITY THAT the Forest Management Plan for The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority: 1983-200J, as prepared by the Ministry of Natural Resources. Appendix WR.lJ6. be approved. CARRIED BACKGROUND Forest properties were acquired by MTRCA following the amalgamation of the original conservation authorities within the region. Since 1957, MTRCA has ratified a number of new agreements wi th the Ministry of Natural Resources, whereby selected Authority properties would be managed by the Ministry to optimize the forest resource. To date, 13 tracts, a total of 789 ha, have been included under the agreement. In doing so, MNR has accepted a long term commitment of forest managemen t to satisfy the objectives of both agencies. The objectives include: - prevention of erosion and sedimentation; - flood control; - maintenance of water y i e ld and stream flow; - wildlife habitat improvemen t; - production of wood products; - recreation; - education and research. DETAILS OF THE WORK ~ BB DONE The plan is for a 20-year per iod , with a five-year term of operation. The plan is renewed every five years to report the progress in management and to review and improve the 20-year forecasts. The 20-year plan reports on past operations and s tate s the objectives and str a teg ies , including forestry, fisheries, wildlife, pa r k s , recreation and aggregates. All resources and key interests are considered. Annual work schedules are produced which reflect the financial resources that are available through the Ministry's annual budgeting process. MNR is required to submit a report to MTRCA each year. The ann ua 1 report includes a summary of the past year's management activities, a financial statement for that year and the planned management activities for the current and next years. Sta ff has reviewed the forest management plan and is satisf ied the objectives of the Conservation Authority have been taken into account. D-55 WATER AND Rl!:LATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD KAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 11. TORONTO SAILING CENTRE PROPOSAL -Terry Neilson KEY ISSUE A proposal to develop the Toronto Sailing Centre for competitive sailing at a site on the Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront. Res. 142 Moved by: Gordon Patterson Seconded by: Lois Griffin THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to review the Toronto Sailing Centre proposal and prepare a recomaendation on a preferred site based on a review of at least three potential locations: Colonel Saauel Saith, Humber Bay West and the Nortbshore (Outer Barbour). CARRIED BACKGROUND In a letter dated April 27, 1990 from Mr. Terry Neilson, the Authority received a proposal to develop the Toronto Sailing Centre. This proposal was submitted on behalf of the following Board of Directors: Robin Clarke: Mr. Clarke is a Toronto architect who is a Vice Commodore of the Royal Canadian Yacht Club and past 8 Metre World Champion. Nigel Cochrane: Mr. Cochrane is a member of the National Sailing Team and represented Canada in the 1988 Olympics in the 470, 2 man dinghy class. Jay Cross: Mr. Cross is a real estate developer who represented Canada in the 470 Class on the 1976, 1980 and 1984 Olympic Teams. Pat Healy: Mr. Healy is Canada's National Sailing Coach and has been the coach responsible for four Olympic sailing medals in the last two Olympic Games. Allan Leibel: Mr. Leibel is a prominent municipal lawyer who represented Canada on the 1972, 1976, 1980 Olympic Teams in three different classes. Terry Neilson: Mr. Neilson, an insurance broker, is a former World Laser Champion and Bronze Medallist in the Finn Class at the 1984 Olympics. The proposed Toronto Sailing Centre would focus on three programs to attract a broad range of ages (7-25), all keenly interested in competitive sailing. These programs include: l. Entry Level Learn-to-Sai1 2. Intermediate programs for boardsailors, singleheaded and doubleheaded dinghy sailor 3. A Toronto base for the National Sailing Team DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DORE Authority staff will review the proposal, including the facility require- ments, and evaluate the suitability of at least three sites: Colonel Samuel Smith, Humber Bay West Park and the Northshore (Outer Harbour). Upon completion of this review and discussions with the Toronto Sailing Centre Board of Directors, staff will prepare a recommendation for the Board's consideration. D-56 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 18. PARI DEVELOPMENT -Master Plan Proposal Metropolitan Toronto Parks, Recreation & Proper ty Dept. KEY ISSUE Approval of a Master Plan for Park Development proposed by the Metropolitan Toronto Parks, Recreation and Property Department for the West Humber River from Highway #27 to Finch Avenue East. Res. 143 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Master Plan for Park Development proposed by the Metropolitan Toronto Parks, Recreation and Property Depart.ent for tbe West Bumber River, fro. Higbway 127 to Finch Avenue East, be approved; AND FURTHER THAT The Metropolitan Toronto Parks, Recreation and Property Depart.ent be so advised. CARRIED BACKGROUND In the mid 1980's the Authority approved a Master Plan for Park Development proposed by the Metropolitan Toronto Parks, Recreation and Property Dept., for the West Humber River from Albion Road to Highway #27. The appropriate permit approvals were granted under Ontario Regulation 293/86 and the final phase of the plan will be completed this year. We are in receipt of an extension to the West Humber Plan which will take the pedestrian/bicycle trail from Highway #27 through the Humber College Arboretum to Claireville. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE 'rhe work wi II in vol ve the construction of a three metre wide asphalt pathway from Highway #27 to Finch Avenue East. Three river crossings are proposed. Approvals will be required under the Authority's Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation (Ont. Reg. 293.86) and from the Humber Arboretum Board prior to any construction taking place within the valley. 19. METRO TORONTO REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE -Appointment of Representative KEY ISSUE The need to appoint an Authority representative to the Metropolitan Toronto Remedial Action Plan Public Advisory Committee. Res. 144 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT Ms. Ila Bossons be appointed as the Authority's representative on the Metropolitan Toronto Remedial Action Plan Public Advisory Coamittee. CARRIED BACKGROUND Up until the Authority's Annual Meeting in February 1990, Mrs. Helen White represented the Authority on the RAP Public Advisory Committee. Since Mrs. White is no longer a member of the Authority, we have been asked by the Public Advisory Committee to appoint a replacement. In this regard, it is recommended that Ms. Ila Bossons be appointed as the Authority's representative on the Public Advisory Committee. D-57 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 20. SPECIAL POLICY AREA DESIGNATION - APPROVAL-IN-PRINCIPLE -Town of Richmond Hill (Humber River Watershed) KEY ISSUE The Town of Richmond Hill has requested consideration from provincial agencie s for the designation of a Special Policy Area - Lake Wilcox/Oak Ridges, Humber River Watershed. Res. 145 Moved by: Lois Dancey Seconded by: Gordoo Patterson THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY TDAT the Town of Richmond Dill's request for Special Policy Area designation for the flood prone communities of Lake Wilcox/Oak Ridges, Dumber River Watershed be approved-in-principle; THAT the Town of Richmond Dill be advised that final approval of a Special Policy Area designation will be considered by the Authority on the basis of further planning and technical study reports to be prepared by the Town in support of this designation by the Town, in consultation with the Ministries of Municipal Affairs and Natural Resources, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of York, THAT the request for final approval must be accompanied by Official Plan and Zoning By-law policies; THAT prior to the final consideration of the Special Policy Area designation, the Authority advises that the Special Policy Area designation and policies, described within the OPA '7l planning document of the Town of Rich.ond Hill, are premature and .ay require revision; AND FURTHER THAT the Ministries of Municipal Affairs and Natural Resources, the Town of Richmond Hill, and the Regiooal Municipality of York be advised of the Authority's reco..endations regarding the request for Special Policy Area designation. CARRIED BACKGROUND Council of the Town of Richmond Hill endorsed the request for Special Policy Area designation - Lake Wilcox/Oak Ridges at their meeting of April 17, 1990. The Special Policy Area designation and supporting flood plain planning policies, if approved, are proposed to be incorporated as modifications to Official Plan Amendment No. 71, a secondary plan for the North Urban Development Area including the Lake Wilcox/Oak Ridges Planning District. Amendments to Zoning By-laws 256-88, 434-88 and 1275 will be required to support a Special Policy Area designation. The Town has prepared modifications to the OPA #7l planning document and has circulated the plan for public review and comment. The plan currently contains map schedules and policies for a Special Policy Area designation. OPA #71 was approved by Council on July 18, 1988. Modifications were required relating to an Environmental Master Servicing Plan and new prov incial initiatives on affordable housing and flood plain planning. MTRCA staff has since been working with the Town of Richmond Hill regarding these modifications. In this regard, a request for approval in principle for a Special Policy Area designation was received by the Authority in July 1989. The request iden tif ied all flood plain lands within the Oak Ridges/Lake Wilcox planning D-58 WATER AND RELA'l'ED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 20. SPECIAL POLICY AREA DESIGNATION - APPROVAL-IN-PRINCIPLE -Town of Richmond Hill (Humber River Watershed) contd area from Bathurst Street east to La ke Wilcox. Authority staff advised that the request for Special Policy Area consideration required a more precise boundary of the flood prone area(s) to be considered and that supporting planning and technical re lated factors required documentation. An informal SPA Technical Committee, with representatives from the Town, MMA, MNR and MTRCA was established to assist the Town in preparing their request. The Town's consultant for the Environmental-Master Servicing' Report, Gore and Storrie Ltd. , has provided assistance to this process. The revised request for approval in principle, including the proposed SPA boundaries and community/technical rat i on a le , is described in the Town's staff report. RATIONALE The Provincidl Flood Plain Planning Policy Statement 1988, establishes the intent and fr amewor k for an SPA designation through Policy (6) Special Policy Area. The provincial policy recognizes that, given the historic development of many villages, town sand cities occurred in the flood plains of streams and rivers, their continued viability depends on a reasoned applica tion of provincial flood pla in standards. SPA's are those areas in which provincial standards for flood plain management are relaxed to recognize certain exceptional situations. Where no suitable alternative exists, the provincial policy has made provisions for permitting new development and redevelopment to ensure the community's social and economic viability. In this regard, an SPA is an area of land, located within a flood plain, on which there is existing development which forms an integral part of an existing flood prone community. When an SPA is approved, the province, conservation authority and municipality agree to accept a higher degree of flood risk than is accepted in other parts of the province. The re are several pockets of development that exist within the Humber River flood plain of the Lake Wilcox Oak Ridges communities. The Town, in consultation with their consultant and the informal SPA Technical Committee, has identified two locations as be ing suitable for SPA designation. These locations are described within Area #1 and Area #3 of their staff report and are located on the map schedule. Area #2 and Area #4, and the balance of the flood plain lands within the Lake Wilcox/Oak Ridges planning area, are not being recommended for SPA designation. The rationale for this recommendation has been based on flood depth, environmental constraints, Official Plan and Zoning and existing flood prone development. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs (MMA) has expressed the need for consolidation and further documentation of the request for approval in principle of the Special Policy Area designation. One specific reques t is for further justification of an SPA designation as opposed to a Two-Zone Approach to flood pIa in management. 'I'his issue has been discussed on several occasions by the informal SPA Technical Committee. Although a Two-Zone approach may be an alternative, Authority staff supports a Special POlicy Area approach based on the following: (1) An SPA designation does not preclude the requirement for f loodproof ing of new development and/or redevelopmen t to the regulatory flood leve 1. 0-59 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 20. SPECIAL POLICY AREA DESIGNATION - APPROVAL-IN-PRINCIPLE -Town of Richmond Hill (Humber River \~atershed) contd (2 ) The new development and redevelopment that may be permissible within the Special Policy Area is generally characterized as infilling, and minor and major additions. While there is every probability that flood - proofing to the regulatory flood level can be achieved, it remains likely that this level will not be technically or feasibly possible for some developments. In this regard the SPA designation eliminates the need for future OP Amendments, which has been experienced in other communities within Markham where a Two-Zone approach had been adopted. (3 ) Ingress and egress cannot be floodproofed to the level of the regulatory flood based on constraints posed by existing site servicing. The Town will be preparing a revised report; however, given the current status of OPA #71, staff has requested that we proceed to consider their request on the basis of information provided to date. While staff recognizes that the process for SPA designation has not been fully realized, we are satisfied with the level of information provided and recommend that the process be reconciled by proceeding with approval-in- principle of the Special Policy Area designation. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE (1 ) Establishment of an SPA Technical Committee with representative~ from the Ministries of Municipal Affairs and Natural Resources, MTRCA, Town of Richmond Hill and Region of York to finalize details and recommendations associated with the SPA designation, including flood plain planning policies, zoning, final boundaries, etc. In this regard, we note that additional requests for SPA consideration have been received by the Town following their public meeting on OPA #71, March 29, 1990. Additional areas to be included within the SPA designation will require community and technical related justi f ication, to be provided by the Town. ( 2) Preparation of a formal request by the Town of Richmond Hill for SPA designation, as may be recommended by the SPA Technical Committee, includ ing rationale for finalized boundaries and proposed Official Plan policies and zoning. (3 ) Consideration of SPA designation by pruvincial agencies. D-60 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25. 1990 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION 21. METRO TORONTO REREDIAL ACTION PLAN -Draft Discussion Paper on Remedial Options KEY ISSUE The release of the Metropolitan Toronto Remedial Action Plan - Dr aft Discussion Paper on Remedial Options. Res. 146 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THAT the staff report on the Metropolitan Toronto Re.edial Action Plan - Draft Discussion Paper on Remedial Options, Appendix WR.22l. be received; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to review this documeut and prepare comments to the Metropolitan Toronto Remedial Action Plan. CARRIED BACKGROUND The International Joint Commission identified 38 areas throughout the Great Lakes where it felt priority should be given to addressing water quality problems. The mechanism developed for addressing these areas was the development of a Remedial Action Plan for each of the 38 sites. The Metropolitan Toronto Remedial Action Plan process is being led by the provincial Ministry of the Environment with Environment Canada, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the various loc a 1 and regional municipalities and the public participating in various ways. In September 1988, the RAP team released its draft Stage 1 report entitled "Existing Conditions and Problem Definition". Since that time, the RAP has established a Public Advisory Committee (PAC), which has been meeting monthly since March of 1989, and a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) . ~vo r k has now been completed on the preparation of the "Draft Discussion Paper on Remedial Options". The next phase of the RAP process will involve review and discussion of remedial options. The report entitled "Draft Discussion Paper on Remedial Options. will form the basis for these discussions. DETAILS OF WOIU[ TO BE DONE Stdff will be reviewing the Draft Discussion Paper and will be providing input to the Metropolitan Toronto RAP when appropriate. The staff's comments will form the basis of a report to the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board prior to release. D-61 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION 22. TREES FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW -,- MTRCA -Humber River Public Tree Planting Day KEY ISSUE Undertake a public tree planting day in co-operation with Trees for Today and Tomorrow (TTTl on Authority owned land in the Humber River watershed. Res. '47 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THAT staff be directed to investigate the feasibility of undertaking a public tree planting on Authority land in the Humber River watershed; AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to enter into agreement with Trees for Today and Tomorrow and take whatever actions may be required to give effect thereto. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Authority is in receipt of a proposal from Trees for Today and Tomorrow to undertake a public tree planting day on The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (MTRCAl property. Trees for Today and Tomorrow is a program of the Institute of Marine and Terrestrial Ecology, a registered charitable organization. The program is directed by Mr. Aird Lewis who has had a long career in resource management affairs. The Authority is currently working with TTT to undertake other revegetation and fish and wildlife habitat enhancement projects in the Humber River watershed. Trees for Today and Tomorrow has provided the funding while Authority staff is carrying out the work. Trees for Today and Tomorrow, in cooperation with MTRCA, proposes that an organized public tree planting day be held in the fall of 1990 on a site in the upper Humber River watershed. The target area is a zone extending from Bolton to Palgrave and easterly to Caledon East. Families, employers, employees, club members and private individuals will be invited to participate in the tree planting event. Already, TTT has compiled a list of lOO people who have called or written indicating they would like to make an environmental contribution by planting trees. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE A site on Authority land must be identified. The area would be approxi- mately two hectares. Public accessibility must be good. A planting date would be identified in the fall 1990. Approximately 5,000 trees would be planted. Organization of the event would be done by TTT. The Authority would assist with site preparation and supervision. Costs associated with the event would be provided by TTT. If the project is approved, a suitable agreement would be prepared to adequately address MTRCA requirements. 0-62 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGRMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 23. GREENLANDS STRATEGY FOR THE GREATER TORONTO AREA KEY ISSUE Brief outlining concerns and recommendations to Ron Kanter, t1. P.P. , for his consideration in the development of a Greenlands Strategy for the Greater Toronto Area. Res. 148 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THAT staff report on the brief submitted to Ron Kanter, M.P.P., on the development of the Greenlands Strategy for the Greater TOronto Area be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1988, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conser vation Authority (MTRCA) adopted the Greenspace Plan for this Greater Toronto Region, which is a pro-active strategy developed to manage the resource base within its jurisdiction. The Strategy was the result of the Authority's identification that certain renewable resource management issues are not being recognized in a period of rapid urbanization. Specif ically, the Greenspace Plan iden ti fied that the most pressing issue in watershed management is "the conservation of the valley system in the face of accelerated mid-watershed urban development". Staff of the Authority has identified an inc rea se in the number of development applications encroaching over the top-of-bank onto valley walls and slopes and into areas outside of the regulated flood plain. The recently adopted Rouge River Comprehensive Basin Management Strategy contains a number of policies which, again, address the protection of the valley system. In the fall of 1989, the Premier of Ontario appointed M.P.P. Ron Kan te r to develop the Greater Toronto Greenlands Strategy to "identify plans to protect in perpetuity the river va Hey and headwater of Lake Ontario in the Greater Toron to Area". RATIONALE The Authority has had a number of recent opportunities to express its resource management concerns, including: l. Presentations of the Greenspace Strategy. 2. Pre sen ta t ion to the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront. 3. Informal staff tours and discussions with Ron Kanter and the Oak Ridges Moraine Working Group. While valley system protection has been discussed generally in these forums, it has not been highlighted to the same degree as waterfront or moraine concerns. Given the high land costs within the reg ion, staff anticipates that development pressure on valley slopes, once considered to be marginal lands, will con tinue. The current tools the Authority has - fill regulations and acquisition - may not be sufficient without a clearly established provincial interest to protect these significant greenspace resources. S ta f f has prepared and sent a letter to Ron Kanter outlining these concerns and a number of recommendations for consideration. . D-63 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 24. ROUGE VALLEY PARK -Provincial Announcement KEY ISSOE To present, for information, the provincial announcement on the Rouge Va lley Park. Res. 149 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Ron Moran THAT the staff report on the provincial announcement on the Rouge Valley Park, Appendix WR.244, be received. CARRIED BACKGROOND On March 26, 1990, the provincial government announced its in ten t ion to preserve the Rouge River valley by creating Canada's largest urban park. In order to protect the Rouge valley, the Ontario Government is declaring a provincial in ten t to preserve lO,SOO acres as a park and will contribute l,600 acres of land. Maps in Appendix Im.244 illustrate the overall proposed Rouge Valley Park and the detailed southern portion, south of Steeles Avenue, of the park. As a park, the Rouge area does not fit into any existing category. However, the Minister of Natural Resources, the Honourable Lyn McLeod, wi 11 be appointing an advisory committee to prepare a recommended management plan for the in i tial 4,300 acre area of park south of Steeles Avenue. The advisory committee will be asked to recommend: which agency(ies) should manage the park; which private land holdings within the area should be acquired and by which public agency. For the remainder of the park area north of Steeles Avenue, the Honourable Lyn McLeod indicated that The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Rouge Watershed Management Strategy will guide the province in implementing interim protection measures in the valleylands and acquisition of land. D-64 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 25. ROUGE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY -Public Works KEY ISSUE Report on how public works in the Rouge Valley wi 11 be managed and mon i tored to be consistent with the Rouge Valley policies. Res. '50 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THAT the staff report on how public works will be managed and monitored in the Rouge Valley be received. AMENDMENT Res. '51 Moved by: Lois Griffin Seconded by: Roger Hollander THAT a .ethod be found to have the Implementation Committee .onitor the public works proposals. THE AMENDMENT VAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIBD THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED BACKGROUND On February 23, 1990, the Authority approved the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy, under resolution #16. One clause of the resolution stated: "THAT staff report on how public works in the Rouge Valley will be managed and monitored to be consistent with the Rouge Valley policies;" Hunicipalities with responsibilities or interests relating to the Rouge River have been represented on a Stakeholders Committee, which helped in the development of the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy. This Strategy has been circulated to the municipalities for their endorsement of the goals, po lic ies , and assigned implementation responsibilities that the strategy provides. This will ensure a conscious approach to resource management in areas where public works are deemed necessary. Authority staff defines public works as essential services such as communication/energy and sewer/water corridors. In addition, through Ontario Regulation 293/86, MTRCA reviews requests for permits which involve the construction of buildings or structures in the regulatory f loodpla in, placement of fill, and a 1 te rat ion s to a watercourse. Ivhen granting these permits, the conditions placed on their approval will reflect the goals, policies, and operational criteria of the Rouge Strategy. One of the implemen ta t ion actions of the Rouge Strategy is the establishment of an Implementation Committee. This Committee will initiate and monitor the implementation of the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy, prepare a two-year progress report on the effectiveness of the Strategy, and recommend any changes to the Strategy to MTRCA. The committee will be comprised of Rouge watershed municipalities, provincial agencies and non-governmental organizations. Finally, MTRCA employs enforcement officers whose duties include ensuring the conditions of permits given under Ontario Regulation 293/86 are met. These officers will continue their compliance monitoring and ensure conditions of permits consistent with the Rouge Strategy are met. 0-65 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 26. ROUGE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY -\Iatercour ses dra in ing less than 130 hectares KEY ISSUE Staff was requested to prepare a report outlining how watercourses draining less than 130 hectares have been dealt with in the past and how these areas wi 11 be managed as a result of the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy. Res. '52 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THAT the staff report on the management of watercourses draining less than l30 hectares, in relation to the Rouge River Basin Management Strategy, be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND On February 23, 1990, the Authority adopted resolution #l6, which, in part, states: "AND FURTHER THAT staff report on how areas less than 130 ha. have been dealt with in the past, and the significant changes in the management of such areas as a result of the Rouge River strategies. " Existing S i tua ti on Under Ontario Regulation 293/86, written permission of the Authority is required prior to the following acti vi ties taking place: (a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flood ing during a regional storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fi 11 to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fi 11 is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream or watercourse. Ontario Regulation 293/86 was made pursuan t to Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act. The Authority administers its fill regulation within areas described by written schedules accompanied by fill line mapping. In general, the fill regulation covers those watercourses which drain greater than 5 square miles (1300 ha) . The Authority administers its construction regulation within valley systems that drain greater than 1/2 square mile (130 ha), in accordance wi, th provincial implementation guidelines for flood plain planning and urban drainage design. Ur ban drainage design principles of Major/Minor System Design are employed by the local municipality within watersheds draining less than 1/2 square mile (130 hectares) . The Authority administers its waterway alteration regulation for all rivers, creeks, streams or watercourses within its jurisdiction. The nature of watercourses within drainage areas less than l/2 square mile are widely varied, ranging from well forested headwater streams originating from the Oak Ridges Moraine or elsewhere, to loca 1 i zed swales/ditches shaped by ag r icultural activities and seasonally flowing. It is these former watercourses that the Authority has protected by exercising its regulation for watercourse alteration. The Authority, through the undertaking of a 0-66 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 12/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 26. ROUGE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY -\va tercourses draining less than 130 hectares contd. associated with significant terrestrial habitats/communities (ESA, ANSI) or Class I to VII wetlands; and within the Moraine, and other areas of the watershed associated with natural terrestrial (forest) vegetation. Therefore, altera tion to a watercourse draining less than l/2 square miles is not generally supported if any of the following characteristic occur: a well-defined valley, natural terrestrial (forest) vegetation, or associa ted with a wetland or important terrestrial feature (ESA, ANSI) . Rouge River Watershed S t rate g y Implications The Rouge River Watershed Management Strategy reaffirmed the potential environmental importance of these smaller drainage areas, and included the importance these watercourses can contribute to fish habitat and/or downstream fish communities. To protect these watercourses, the Comprehensive Basin Management Strategy (CBMS) for the Rouge River recommended the following policy: A publicly owned riparian habitat zone sha 11 be established adjacent to watercourse less than 130 ha in drainage if the watercourse has any of the following characteristics: well-defined valley, permanent flow/fish habitat natura 1 terrestrial (woody) vegetation; associated with a wetland, or important terrestrial feature (eg. ANSI, ESA) . The riparian habitat shall consist of indigenous plant s pe c i e s , be comprised of at lea s t 50% woody species, and be a minimum of 10 m or twice the low flow channel width on each s ide of the watercourse, wh ichever is greater. Therefore, un d e r the CBMS for the Rouge River, requests for alteration to a watercourse draining less than l/2 square mile would not be supported if any of the characteristics noted above are present. This advocates the protection of the valley systems. For those watercourses where alterations may be supported, the CBMS for the Rouge Ri ve r requires tha~ any watercourse alteration that con trois stormwater quantity and quality be based on the downstream watercourse or resource management objectives. Depending on the downstream objectives, alteration proposals could include: natural channel design of the altered watercourse for terrestrial and fisheries habitat improvemen t; fisheries habitat creation and/or improvement downstream of the altered watercourse (bank cover, log cribs, riparian habitat plantings) . D-67 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THB BOARD 26. ROUGE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY -Watercourses draining less than 130 hectares contd. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The Authority has included a Fill Regulation Extension Project, which will review all watercourses, valleys and streams that are currently not fill regulated. Currently, most watercourses draining greater than 5 square miles are fill regulated and this project will allow the Authority to regulate the placement of fill for watercourses draining greater than 1/2 square mile. As a result of a request by the Town of Markham to review the possibility of extending fill regulation to all watercourses regardless of size of drainage area, staff will review those areas draining less than l/2 square mile as part of the Fill Regulation Extension Project. 27. A NEW LOOK FOR HARBOURFRONT -Report of the Provincial Review, March 1990 KEY ISSUE The role of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority within the Harbourfront Lands contained within the report of the Provincial Review dated March 1990 and entitled A New Look For Harbourfront. Res. '53 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THAT the staff report on the Report of the Provincial Review, entitled -A New Look For Harbourfront-, dated March 1990, be received for information. CARRIED BACKGROUND The background to this issue is laid out in the report. Parts of Chapter 1, entitled The Setting, are quoted below. "On December l3, 1989, The Honourable John Sweeney, Minister of Municipal Affairs for Ontario, placed on the entire Harbourfront site a Zoning Order under Section 46 (1) (al of the Planning Act, 1983. This order put an immediate halt on development at Harbourfront, and its purpose was to provide time in which to find a better solution to the issues relating to the legitimate public right to access and enjoyment of the waterfront as a public amenity. An earlier freeze on Harbourfront development imposed by the City of Toronto was due to expire the following day. "The minister's order was a result of discussions between provincial officials and officials of the Harbourfront Corporation, the City of Toronto and the federal government. These talks confirmed that there was still fundamental dissatisfaction with Harbourfront's future as it had been defined by the City Settlement, the recent agreement made between Harbourfront and the city which had been approved by the City Council and the federal Treasury Board. "In simple terms, the problem is that it is no longer desirable to have any more condominiums or private buildings constructed in the Harbourfront site south of Queen's Quay West which would inhibit the public access to the waterfront and enjoyment of the area. In addition, there is frustration with the principle of supporting the D-68 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 27. A NEW LOOK FOR HARBOURFRONT -Report of the Provincial Review, March 1990 contd. successful cultural, educational and recreational programming at Harbourfront with the revenue that comes from continued property developmen t on the site. Concern about these two points was clearly expressed and documented in the recen t Crombie Report on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront. "Over and above these specific problems, there is the realization that the public expectations for the development of Harbourfront, a unique area of public land, have not been met. "The province's intervention is an attempt to pull the plug on the interminable wash-and-rinse cycle of Harbourfront reviews and renegotiations of the past four years which have failed to bring about a satis factor y resolution of the problems. The Government of Ontario's concern comes from its awareness that the Harbourfront site is an extraordinarily impor tan t public regional resource whose value must not be damaged or ultimately destroyed by unfortunate compromises". This report addresses the many issues surrounding Harbourfront and makes several recommendations. One recommendation under the heading of Land Transactions, reads as follows: "The commercial rights to the Spadina Re tail Pie r should be conveyed at $1 to The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, so that th is public agency can create an appropriate development which complemen ts the marina, and adds to the attractions of the waterfront. " Since this report has just been received and it is unclear how the report and its recommendations will be handled by the province, th is is brought to the attention of the Board for information only. Staff is assuming that there will be opportunities for comment but this is not known at this time. A subsequent report will come to the Board with staff's comments on the proposa 1 at the appropriate time. 0-69 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING '2/90, HELD MAY 25, 1990 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at lO:25 a.m., May 25, 1990. Don Jackson J.C. Mather Chairman Acting Secretary-Treasurer em ~ , the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes 0-70 WATER AND RELATED LAND 29-JUNE-1990 #3/90 MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD The Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board met in Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitors Centre on Friday, June 29, 1990. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. PRESENT Chairman Don Jackson Members Ila Bossons Lois Hancey Brian Harrison Marie Labatte Ron Moran Maja Prentice Chairman of the Authority John McGinnis ABSENT Members Lois Griffin Roger Hollander Joyce Trimmer Vice Chairman of the Authority Gordon Patterson MINUTES Res. #54 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THAT the Minutes of Meeting #2/90 be approved. CARRIED DELEGATION Members of the Sam Smith Boaters Federation appeared before the Board to present a status report on the development of the proposal for boating and related facilities at the Colonel Sam Smith Park. 0-71 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES -Draft KEY ISSUE The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (MTRCA) is proceeding with its second watershed management study on the DUffin watershed to be completed by mid 1991. MTRCA, in conjunction with Ministry of Housing, has developed draft watershed management guidelines which the Ministry of Housing would like to use as part of the urban design process for the Seaton Community. Res. #55 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Brian Harrison THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff provide the draft guidelines entitled "Ecosystem Planning Guidelines: A new Approach to Watershed Management" to the Ministry of Housing for use in the development of the Seaton community; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to continue to refine these guidelines to be promoted by The Metro Toronto and Region Conservation Authority throughout its jurisdiction pending the completion of watershed management studies for each of its watersheds. CARRIED Res. #56 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Ila Bossons THAT debate on the Watershed Management Guidelines be re-opened for two minutes, to receive Councillor Bosson's comments on the issue. CARRIED Res. #57 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: John McGinnis THAT the debate on the Watershed Management Guidelines be olosed and that the COmments of Councillor Bossons be made available to staff. CARRIED BACKGROUND Over the past three yea+s, the MTRCA has completed a strategic planning exercise to establish long term goals in fulfilling its mandate. The MTRCA's Greenspace Plan for the Greater Toronto Region (l988) is a strategy to manage the resource base within its jurisdiction in a more proactive fashion. . D-72 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES -Draft CONTD. The Greenspace Plan is founded on the development of comprehensive watershed management strategies for each of the MTRCA's nine watersheds. The Rouge River watershed was the first comprehensive basin management strategy (CBMS) to be completed. The CBMS for the Rouge River watershed was a set of policies and implementation actions to manage the watershed as a healthy ecosystem. This ecosystem approach not only integrated the land, water, biological, and human features of the watershed, but also attempted to unite the interests of provincial and municipal agencies and non-governmental organizations through a multi-agency planning exercise. The MTRCA has recently embarked on a similar study for the Duffin Creek watershed. This watershed is perhaps the most rural of the nine watersheds in the Authority's area. With the current pressures for development (eg. waste disposal, airport development, and affordable housing), it is critical that an integrated watershed management plan be developed as soon as possible. At meeting #l, the Board passed the following resolution: "THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff proceed with the DUffin Creek Watershed Management Study; "AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to seek the additional funding required to complete the necessary study components." DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE MTRCA staff has determined a critical path that will be used for this study to coordinate the three study components: public consultation, technical studies, and a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) support project. Public consultation is expected to play an even larger role in this study in light of the controversial issues within the watershed (including the Seaton Affordable Housing Project and the proposed airport). The technical framework for the Duffin Creek study will be based on land use scenarios (existing, committed, planned development, and future development) that will enable agencies to evaluate the potential impacts of development in the watershed. The GIS project will provide support to the public consultation and technical studies components through information management, spatial data coordination and management alternative testing. The anticipated completion date for the DUffin Creek study is mid 1991. The study will focus on public consultation as a means of achieving the level of commitment necessary to implement the management actions required to ensure that the Duffin watershed remains in a healthy ecosystem state. MTRCA will act as the project manager for the study and, through a two way consultation process with stakeholders, develop the vision, policies and implementation actions. Stakeholders, consisting of government agencies, non-government and private sector organizations, will be organized into a number of working groups to develop management actions for major issues on the watershed. Issues may include groundwater, water quality, fisheries, and terrestrial resources. The technical studies and a group of experts will provide support/direction to the working groups. 0-73 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES -Draft CONTD. The technical studies will focus first on an assessment of the Rouge study findings and their application to the Duffin, then follow a similar approach to the Rouge study. Subwatershed studies will be completed on the watershed tributaries draining the Seaton lands and these results will be scaled up in an assessment of the entire watershed. This subwatershed/watershed approach was found to be very cost effective in the Rouge study. Studies will focus on hydrology, run-off control, water quality, groundwater, fisheries and terrestrial resources. Early this year, staff finalized terms of reference for collection of baseline data for the watershed and initiated discussions with several ministries, in particular the Ministry of Housing and the Office of the Greater Toronto Area regarding coordination and joint funding of studies on the DUffin watershed. A key result of these discussions was a commitment from the Ministry of Housing to work closely with MTRCA on those technical studies and aspects of public consultation which are mutually beneficial. In this regard, MOH has agreed to fund the database coordination study, a workshop series to develop environmental and hazard management guidelines for Seaton, and the necessary technical studies to complete the majority of the subwatershed studies on the DUffin watershed. In return, the MTRCA provides technical direction and coordination of these studies and ensures that the study products meet the needs of both agencies. MTRCA has initiated several of these studies in conjunction with the Ministry of Housing, in particular, developing environmental and hazard management guidelines to guide the Seaton community design process. These MTRCA guidelines entitled "Ecosystem Planning Guidelines: An Innovative Approach to Watershed Management" were developed through a series of workshops with a team of experts, MTRCA and MOH staff. The objective was to build upon the approach and conclusions of the Rouge study and produce guidelines that could be used on an interim basis for the Seaton lands and be refined as the MTRCA proceeded with the Duffin Watershed Management Study. These MTRCA guidelines, Appendix WR.249, are still in draft form; however, MOH would like to begin using them as part of the planning and design process for the Seaton community. Authority staff would like to provide them to MOH and continue to revise and improve them to establish watershed management guidelines that MTRCA could promote throughout its jurisdiction. These could be used on an interim basis in other watersheds pending the development of comprehensive watershed management plans such as the Rouge and Duffin. FINANCIAL DETAILS MOH has provided honorariums to the experts who participated in the workshops and funding for the facilities; MTRCA provided staff resources to lead, organize and participate in the workshops. In total MOH provided $22,000 in support of this MTRCA initiative. MTRCA will continue to devote staff time to finalize the guidelines and funding of $2,SOO through the Duffin Study for production of the final product. 0-74 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES -Draft CONTD. FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS The Duffin Watershed Management study presents a challenge to the Authority in implementing its Greenspace strategy as the project manager for watershed management. For the Duffin watershed, this is particularly critical because of the complexity of issues, the long list of stakeholders, and the need to coordinate the variety of studies being undertaken by various agencies in the watershed. The opportunity for the MTRCA to participate with the MOH provides not only funding assistance to the overall Duffin Study effort, but an opportunity to play an active role in ensuring that the Seaton community provides for a high level of protection for environmental health and public safety. 2. ATARATIRI PROJECT -Report entitled "ATARATIRI: Principles, Directions and Strateqies KEY ISSUE Request for comments on a City of Toronto report on the status of the Ataratiri Project. Res. #58 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ila Bossons THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to prepare comments on the City of Toronto report entitled "ATARATIRI: Principles, Directions, and Strategies", after consultation with the Ministry of Natural Resources, and that these comments be brought to an appropriate Executive Committee meeting for approval; AND FURTHER THAT the Commissioner of Planning and Development for the City of Toronto be so advised. Amendment Res. #59 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ila Bossons THAT staff comments on the report "ATARATIRI: Principles, Directions, and strategies", be brought back to the Water' Related Land Management Advisory Board for review in september, 1990; AND FURTHER THAT the Commissioner of Planning and Development for the city of Toronto be advised that the MTRCA's comments will be forthcoming after the September 1990 meetings of the Advisory Board and the Authority. THE AMENDMENT WAS................................................. CARR I ED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS..................................CARRIED 0-75 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. ATARATIRI PROJECT -Report entitled "ATARATIRI: Principles, Directions and Strateqies CONTD. BACKGROUND At its meeting on May 7 and 8, 1990, the City of Toronto Council adopted the following recommendations with respect to the Ataratiri Project, resulting from a report from the Commissioner of Planning and the Commissioner of Housing dated April 20, 1990, entitled "ATARATIRI: Principles, Directions, and strategies": Recommendations 1-7 1. That Council approve the planning principles for Ataratiri that are contained to section 4 of the report (April 20, 1990), entitled "ATARATIRI: Principles, Directions and strategies". 2. That Council instruct the Commissioner of Planning and Development to proceed with preparing a Part II Official Plan Proposals Report based on the directions indicated in said report (as summarized in section 10) and on the results of the proposed work programme. 3. That Council authorize the appropriate City staff to begin discussions with Metro Toronto and Ontario Hydro staff regarding the realignments of Bayview and Eastern Avenue, as described in section 6 of said report. 4. That the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Commissioners of Planning and Development and of Housing, be requested to report on any special provincial legislation that may be required to implement the strategies described in section 9.6 of said report, with a view to drafting the necessary application to the Province, if required. 5. That a copy of the (April 20, 1990) report be forwarded to the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront with a request by Council that the Royal Commission give special consideration to the possible roles of the federal and provincial governments and other appropriate agencies in addressing the flooding problems associated with the Lower Don River, as described in section 5 of the report. 6. That copies of the (April 20, 1990) report be forwarded to the following parties for their information, with a request that any possible comments be submitted directly to the Commissioner of Planning and Development: the Fire Chief, the Board of Health, the Planning Advisory Committee, the Housing Action Committee, the Alternative Housing Subcommittee, the Safe City Committee, the city Cycling Committee, the Cityplan '9l Task Force, the Lower Don River Clean-Up Task Force, the Gardiner Lakeshore Task Force, the Toronto Historical Board, the Toronto Arts Council, the Toronto Board of Education, the Metropolitan Separate School Board, the Metro Toronto Chief of Police, the Metro Toronto Commissioner of Planning, the Metro Commissioner of Transportation, the Metro Toronto Commissioner of Parks and Property, the Metro Toronto Commissioner of Community Services, the Toronto Transit Commission, the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Ontario Hydro, the Minister of 0-76 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. ATARATIRI PROJECT -Report entitled "ATARATIRI: Principles, Directions and Strateqies CONTO. Housing, the Minister of Natural Resources, the Minister of the Environment, the Minister of Municipal Affairs, the Minister of Education, the Minister of Community and Social Services, the Minister of Industry, Trade and Commerce, the Federal Minister responsible for the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Bell Canada, Canadian National Railway, Canadian Pacific Railway, Consumers' Gas, GO Transit, the Minister of Health, the Minister of Labour, and the Minister of Transportation and Communications. 7. That the Commissioner of Public Works, in consultation with the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, report on the possibilities and procedures necessary for the prevention of flooding in the near future; that is, in the next fifty years. The report is quite a lengthy one, containing over 100 pages. A copy of the entire report is available should the members wish to review it in its entirety. Appendix WR 263 gives a copy of the Executive Summary, Table of Contents, and selected portions of the text, for the Board's information. The selected portions of the text relate mainly to the flooding and flood control issue or to references to the Don River and are as follows: CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION SECTIONS 1.1 1.2a,b,C 1.3 CHAPTER 2 PLANNING CONTEXT SECTIONS 2.3b CHAPTER 4 PRINCIPLES SECTIONS 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 CHAPTER 5 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING SECTIONS 5.1a,b 5.2f 5.3 CHAPTER 6 PHYSICAL PLANNING SECTIONS 6.2j 6.3 CHAPTER 9 STRATEGIES SECTIONS 9.5 CHAPTER lO CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MAPS NUMBERS 11, l2, l3, 18 and 19 The report is a comprehensive analysis of the status of the Ataratiri Project at this time. The report also identifies areas where ongoing studies are required and outlines some strategies for dealing with the various issues raised in the report. The report concludes with some conclusions and recommendations. D-77 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. ATARATIRI PROJECT -Report entitled "ATARATIRI: Principles, Directions and Strateqies CONTD. Recommendation number 6 adopted by Council directs that this report be circulated to many agencies, including the Authority, for their review and comments. A seventh recommendation was also added by Council which relates directly to the Authority and the issue of flood protection. staff will report on the outcome of these discussions with the Commissioner of Public Works at an appropriate time. Authority staff are continuing to work with the City of Toronto, Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs on the Technical Advisory Committee dealing with the flooding issue and the Special Policy Area (SPA) designation. Authority staff are also discussing with MNR, the findings of the various technical studies related to flood control, and the other planning issues which have an impact on the flooding problem such as land use, urban design (fig. 13) and massing scheme (fig. 18) as they relate to the Authority's flood control policies and the Provincial Flood Plain Planning Policy. The results of these discussions will form the basis of the Authority's comments to the City Commissioner of Planning and Development on the above noted report. Given that there is no Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board Meeting until September, it is recommended that any comments to the City of Toronto be directed through the Authority's Executive Committee at an appropriate meeting this summer. It is also recommended that the City of Toronto Commissioner of Planning and Development be advised that the Authority's comments will be forthcoming. 0-78 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 3. MTRCA FILL REGULATION EXTENSION PROJECT. 1990 KEY ISSUE Correspondence received from The Honourable Lyn McLeod, Ontario Minister of Natural Resources, regarding the Authority's Fill Regulation Extension Project, 1990, Appendix WR 303. Res. #60 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Brian Harrison THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the correspondence from The Honourable Lyn McLeod, Ontario Minister of Natural Resources, regarding the Authority's Fill Regulation Extension Project, 1990, be received for information. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Meeting #8/89, December 8, 1989 the Authority approved the following: "KEY ISSUE Council of the Town of Markham has recommended that the Authority extend its fill regulation on all watercourses, streams and valleys within the Town of Markham, including those which have a tributary area of less than 1/2 square mile. Concurrently, the Authority has prepared a project for 1990 regarding the extension of its current fill regulation, as described by Ontario Regulation 293/86; however, the degree to which the Fill Regulation Line will be extended is to be determined as part of this project in consultation with the Province of Ontario, the municipalities involved and the pUblic. "Res. #256 Moved by: Lois Griffin Seconded by: Howard Moscoe "THAT the Town of Markham be advised that the Authority has proposed for 1990 a Fill Regulation Extension Project and that the Town's recommendation to include all watercourses, streams and valleys, even those draining less that 1/2 square mile, will be discussed as part of the project; "THAT a decision regarding the extension of the Authority's Fill Regulation Line to include all watercourses, streams and valleys beyond the 1/2 square mile limit be deferred pending the results of the proposed 1990 Project; "THAT the Province be advised of the urgency to have an extension to the Authority's fill regulation to address the development pressure within the Greater Toronto Area; "THAT, upon submission of the fill regulation schedules, the Province expedite the required approval process; "AND FURTHER THAT the Province be requested to co-operate with the Authority in identifying interim measures to control the placing of fill in areas draining less that 1300 ha (five square miles). CARRIED" 0-79 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 3. MTRCA FILL REGULATION EXTENSION PROJECT. 1990 CONTD. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Forty thousand dollars ($40,000) was approved within the Authority's 1990 budget to carry out the Fill Regulation Extension Project. A Terms of . Reference for this project, to retain consultant services, is being prepared. The scope of the work includes the update and preparation of fill line maps and written schedules, and municipal, provincial and public consultation. Once these tasks have been completed, a formal submission shall be made to the Province requesting the approval of the proposed fill regulation. This submission is now scheduled for 1991. The Minister has responded to our request by indicating support for this project and has advised that once the Authority's Fill Regulation is received, they will expedite its registration through the Regulations Committee of Cabinet. The Minister has also noted provincial funding received by the Authority for hydrologic studies associated with our flood plain mapping extension project. The Fill Regulation Extension Project will incorporate recently completed flood plain mapping; however, the fill line mapping will extend beyond the limits of this flood plain mapping. Staff will initiate discussion with staff of the Ministry of Natural Resources to pursue the possibility of interim measures to control the placement of fill in areas draining less than l300 hectares. In this regard, we look forward to receiving the pending report of Mr. R. Kanter, MPP st. Andrew-st. Patrick, which is expected to outline a provincial "Green lands Legacy" strategy. 4. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1987-1991 -East Point Park. Citv of Scarborouqh KEY ISSUE Continuation of the development program at East Point Park in the City of Scarborough. Res. #61 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Brian Harrison THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the 1990 development program at East Point Park, City of Scarborough, under the Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Project 1987-1991, at a total cost of $100,000. . CARRIED BACKGROOND In late 1988, the Authority initiated a master plan and environmental assessment study for the future development of the East Point Park area. By December, 1989, the Authority and the consultants had presented, to a pUblic meeting, a preferred master plan. The Authority has also been carrying out environmental monitoring, improvements to Copperfield Road, and establishment of a public parking lot at Copperfield and Beechgrove. D-80 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 4. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1987-1991 -East Point Park. City of Scarborouqh CONTD. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The major development components proposed for 1990 are as follows: 1. Master Plan/Environmental Assessment The master plan/environmental assessment report will be completed and circulated for further public review with a public meeting of the Board scheduled for fall, 1990. It is anticipated that the master plan/environmental assessment will be recommended to the Authority and forwarded to the Minister of the Environment for approval. In addition, the Authority will be carrying out water quality monitoring. The total cost to carry out this component will be $40,000. 2. site Maintenance/Securitv During 1990, the site requires improvements to minimize the vandalism and destruction of the current park amenities. The total estimated cost for this component will be $60,000. FINANCIAL DETAILS The total budget estimated for components land 2 is $100,000. Funds are available under the "Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Project 1987-l991" in series account no. 222-. s. INTERIM TASK FORCE ON THE LOWER DON VALLEY CLEAN-UP KEY ISSOE Authority support for and participation with the Interim Task Force on the Lower Don Valley Clean-Up. Res. #62 MovecS by: Marie Labatte Seoonded by: Brian Harrison THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the City of Toronto and the Interim Task Force on the Lower Don Valley Clean-up be acSvised that the Authority supports the objectives of the Task Force and that the Authority looks forward to working olosely with them; AND FURTHER THAT statf be directed to explore funding possibilities for an appropriate project of the Task Force as part of the 1991 budget preparation. CARRIED D-8l WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION S. INTERIM TASK FORCE ON THE LOWER DON VALLEY CLEAN-UP CONTD. BACKGROUND On May 7 and 8, 1990, the City of Toronto Council adopted the report of the Interim Task Force. The key items in the report are: 1. The establishment of a permanent task force through the City of Toronto nominating committee process. It is proposed that pOlitical/citizen representatives from upstream municipalities be invited to sit on the task force as observers. 2. An integrative open space review which would identify how to coordinate the various studies now affecting the open spaces of the valley within the city. 3. A series of workshops for communities adjacent to the Don River within the City. The intent is to involve the public in the development of goals for the Lower Don open spaces and in field inventories to be done under expert direction. Authority staff were invited by Mr. Mark Wilson, Co-chair of the Interim Task Force on the Lower Don Clean-Up, to an initial meeting of task force members to discuss how the Authority might work with this group. As a result of this meeting, representatives of the task force have been invited to make a brief presentation to the committee for their information and as background to this report. The Authority has many objectives which are similar to the task force. Our Greenspace strategies relating to the waterfront, valley and watershed management, and our recreation strategy, are consistent with those of the task force. The Authority's involvement with the dredging of the Keating Channel, the Ataratiri Flood Protection studies and our work on water quality, also relate to the concerns and interests of the task force. The Authority's objectives for acquisition of the valley land especially in the Lower Don, would also be key to the work of the task force. As a result, the Authority should be an active participant and supporter of the Lower Don Task Force, either in the form of technical advice, or in a monetary form such as providing some funding for an appropriate project or supplying plant material. It is recommended, therefore, that the Authority advise the City of Toronto and the Interim Task Force on the Lower Don Clean-Up that the Authority supports the efforts of this task force and will provide whatever assistance it can. Staff should also be directed to explore some funding alternatives to assist in the work of the task force as part of the preparation of the Authority's 1991 budget. D-82 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 6. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1987-1991 -Bluffers Waterfront Park. citv of Scarborouqh KEY ISSUE To undertake the construction of the first phase of the replacement high voltage electrical feeder cable at Bluffer's Waterfront Park, city of Scarborough. Res. #63 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Brian Harrison THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the construction of the first phase of the replacement high voltage electrical feeder cable at Bluffers Waterfront Park, City of ScarDorough, under the "Lake ontario Waterfront Development Project 1987 - 1991", at a total cost of $150,000. CARRIED BACKGROUND The main Phase II high voltage electrical feeder cable was installed by the Authority in 1979, and as a result of two major breaks in this cable, concerns have been raised as to the future lifespan of the cable. A consultant's report has identified several problems with the existing cables and recommends that in order to maintain safe and dependable power and meet future demand, the system be upgraded. RATIONALE The Authority and Metro Toronto Parks Department are required by lease agreements with the marina and boating clubs to provide reliable hydro service in addition to meeting the needs identified in the Park Master Plan. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The electrical consulting engineers have completed the preliminary design for the replacement cable which specifies installation in underground concrete encased ducts to minimize maintenance and operational costs. The total estimated cost of this project is $250,000 and is to be completed over a two year period with underground concrete encased ducts to be installed in 1990. FINANCIAL DETAILS The estimated cost of Phase II construction is $150,000. Funds are available under the Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Project 1987 - 1991 in Account Number 220-08. 0-83 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 7. BUDGET PREPARATION - 1991 PROJECT FILES KEY ISSUE In preparation of the 1991 budget sUbmission to the Province, it will be necessary to develop project files for all proposed capital projects, studies, maintenance and for the Conservation Services Program, for review and priority ranking by the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR). Res. #64 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT statf be directed to prepare projects files for the projects listed in Appendix WR.294, and submit them to the Ministry of Natural Resources. CARRIED BACKGROUND Any capital undertaking being considered by an Authority must have a project file submitted and ranked to be eligible for provincial funding. Project files are divided into funding categories defined by MNR and are priorized and ranked against other Conservation Authority projects which fall within the same category. This ensures that provincial dollars are allocated to the most important projects which have been identified by the authorities. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Appendix WR.294 lists project files that staff are recommending be submitted to the MNR for funding consideration. These files represent, with the exception of administration, the Division's work programs and will form the basis of the preliminary budget for 1991. The project files are listed in what staff feel is the relative order of priority; however, the list may be updated to reflect new projects or revised priorities. Please note that the list of project files under the Erosion Control _ Capital are further divided into the benefiting municipality projects of Metro, Peel, York and Durham, and the priority listings are relative to the benefiting municipality; however, the province will rank all Erosion Control - Capital, together. Also, where applicable, a budget cut off line is shown which reflects the annual funding level approved for the Erosion Projects. Greenspace initiatives are denoted by an asterisk. D-84 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 8. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO 1987-1991 -Proposed Slope Stabilization Works at the rear of No. 8 Saddletree Drive. citv of North York KEY ISSUE To construct erosion control and slope stabilization works at the rear of No. 8 Saddletree Drive, in the City of North York. Res. #65 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Brian Harrison THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the construction of the erosion control works at the rear of No. 8 Saddletree Drive, City of North York, under the Project for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto 1987- 1991, at a total estimated cost of $130,000; AND FURTHER THAT the owners of No. 8 Sadd1etree Drive contribute $5,000 towards the cost of the works. CARRIED BACKGROUND Saddletree Drive is located in the City of North York in the vicinity of Leslie Street and Steeles Avenue. Nos. 6-10 Saddletree Drive are located at the crest of the German Mills Creek valley. The valley wall is approximately 14m high and the creek is coincident with the toe of the valley slope. On March 13, 1990, staff received a report from the owners of Nos. 8 and 10 Saddletree that a slope failure had occurred behind their homes. Staff visited the site the same day and found that a relatively shallow translational failure, approximately 10m wide, affecting the full height of the slope had occurred and was partially blocking the river. Later the same day another, but much wider and deeper, slide occurred which encroached into the rear yard of No. 8 Saddletree Drive. Although the homes did not appear to be in any immediate danger, they were close enough to the slide (10m) to cause concern, and therefore staff felt that a soils consultant should be retained to carry out a soils investigation and design study. At Meeting #2/90 the Executive Committee under Resolution #32, recommended: "That Terraprobe Limited, be retained to carry out a soils investigation and design study at the rear of Nos. 6-l0 Saddletree Drive in the City of North York, for a total estimated cost of $6,700." Staff are now in receipt of the report prepared by Terraprobe Limited and, based on their findings and recommendations, are prepared to recommend that works be carried out at the rear of No. 8 Saddletree Drive. 0-85 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 8. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO 1987-1991 -Proposed Slope Stabilization Works at the rear of No. 8 Saddletree Drive. City of North York CONTD. RATIONALE The report concluded that the existing dwelling at No. 8 Saddletree Drive, which is situated about 10m back (and the suspended deck which is about 7m back) from the existing slope crest, is sufficiently back from the slope crest to be considered currently stable against potential slope failures. However, the steep failure scarp at the slope crest is expected to experience gradual slumping to a flatter inclination. This could result in the slope crest regressing closer to the existing dwelling and rear deck, with additional loss of private property. Until the slope is restored and protected, there will be a risk of additional slope areas experiencing instability and/or erosion. This could lead to additional loss of private property (rear yards) to the owners of No. 8 Saddletree Drive and their immediate neighbours' properties (Nos. 6 and 10 Saddletree Drive). As a result, staff are recommending that remedial works be carried out this year. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE In order to protect No. 8 Saddletree from the loss of additional property and further protect Nos. 6 and 10 Saddletree, we are recommending the erosion be addressed by armouring the riverbank with stone and the slope repaired by constructing an engineered filled slope. The estimated cost to carry out this work is as follows: Activity Cost 1. Survey and Legal 2,500 2. Access preparation and maintenance 15,000 3. Sediment Control 4,500 4. Construction of a rip rap and armour stone channel 60,000 5. Construction of an engineered filled slope 30,000 6. Restoration and revegetation 6,000 7. contingencies approximately 10% 12,000 TOTAL $130,000 FINANCIAL DETAILS project policy states that where private property is benefiting directly from the proposed works, that the owner(s) must agree to make a suitable contribution towards the cost of the works by way of money and/or lands. In the case of the Saddletree Project, only No. 8 is benefiting directly from the work, and based on our formula would be required to contribute $14,500 towards the cost of the works. However, since only a small fraction of the works will be carried out on private property, staff are recommending the contribution be limited to $5,000. 0-86 0-86 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 8. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO 1987-1991 -Proposed Slope Stabilization Works at the rear of No. 8 Saddletree Drive. City of North York CONTD. In addition, the owners of No. 6 and No. 10 Saddletree Drive will be required to execute our standard indemnification agreement, and in the case of Nos. 6 and 8 relocate their fences onto the property line. The funds for this project will be raised as follows: Private funding 5,000 Grant supported (MNR) 68,750 Levy supporteq (Metro) 56,250 TOTAL $130,000 This project will be carried out under the Authority's Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization Project for the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. This site was not included in the 1990 Budget, therefore, a project file must be prepared and submitted to the Ministry of Natural Resources and the funds allocated from within the local priority funding category. 9. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1987-1991 -Frenchman's Bav. Town of Pickerinq KEY ISSUE To carry out the preparation of a park plan for the area adjacent to the southwest corner of Frenchman's Bay designated "Special study Area" in Amendment Number 13 to the Pickering District Plan (Fairport Community). Res.#66 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Brian Harrison THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to retain consultants to carry out the preparation of a Waterfront Park Plan for the area designated "special Study Area" at Frenchman's Bay, as a basis to amend the Pickering District Plan (Fairport Community) at an estimated cost of $30,000, subject to approval of terms of reference by the Ministry of Natural Resources. CARRIED 0-87 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 9. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1987-1991 -Frenchman's Bay. Town of Pickerinq CaNTO. BACKGROUND The lands in the southwest sector of Frenchman's Bay primarily under the Authority ownership were designated "Special Study Area" in amendment Number 13 to the Pickering District Plan, as approved by the Ontario Municipal Board on November 14, 1984. In the amendment, a policy statement under Major Open Space states the following: "The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority shall be encouraged to continue its land acquisition programme in the area. The lands acquired should be used to protect the environmental qualities of Frenchman's Bay and its shoreline as well as to provide recreational opportunities of regional significance. The Authority lands should be developed according to plans prepared by the Authority in consultation with the Town of Pickering. At this time, lands lying east of West Shore Boulevard and south of Sunrise Avenue shall be designated as a "Special Study Area." The Town shall enter into discussions with affected land owners in this area regarding The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's proposal to establish a park. Following these discussions, land use designations and policies for this area shall be established by an amendment to this plan." The Authority's main activity in this area has been to continue to purchase the remaining private properties in the area subject to availability of funding. The Authority has recently received a request from the Frenchman's Bay Yacht Club to consider a joint winter boat storage/summer public parking lot proposal which, along with other operational problems, suggests that it is time to review and prepare a plan for the area. RATIONALE The Pickering Official Plan requires the preparation of a park plan in discussion with the affected land owners in the area and the Town of Pickering. This planning process will enable the Authority to prepare a plan with public input to form the basis of land use designations and policies for the "Special Study Area" in the Pickering District Plan (Fairport Community). 0-88 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 9. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1987-1991 -Frenchman's Bay. Town of Pickerinq CONTD. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE To undertake the preparation of a park plan, a consultant will be hired on the basis of terms of reference approved by the Ministry of Natural Resources. The terms of reference include the following tasks: . review existing studies of the area including the Pickering Parks and Recreation study, the Fairport Community Plan . review recommendations of the Royal Commission on the Future Toronto Waterfront . document existing land use, municipal services, road classification, traffic counts, ownership . document the baseline natural resources of the area - wetlands/marsh, vegetation, fisheries . document and quantify existing use of the study area and west spit . public participation program which could include i) open house/mailing to ratepayer groups/user groups soliciting broad range of recreation ideas for the area; H) public meeting to present plan options; Hi) Second Public Meeting to obtain input on preferred plan. (Note: Preferred plan and study would then be submitted to Pickering Planning as part of an Official Plan Amendment process) . interviews with key interest groups - Frenchman's Bay Yacht Club, Pickering Field Naturalists, West Shore community Association, Fairport Community Association . prepare a park plan which addresses i) the linkages with Petticoat Creek and the northern sector of Frenchman's Bay; H) park activity areas; Hi) parking/joint facilities; iv) acquisition; v) environmental education; vi) capital works and vii) identification of any views, noise or access impacts . prepare cost estimates and an implementation strategy FINANCIAL DETAILS The estimated budget to undertake the park plan and study is $30,000. Funds are available under account 222-53 subject to further budget reallocation approval by the Ministry of Natural Resources. FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS The Park Planning Study will result in an approved plan which will form the basis for implementation by the Authority and a land use/policy commitment by the municipality. The study will also provide the context to analyze all options for public use of this popular waterfront area. . 0-89 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 10. COLONEL SAM SMITH WATERFRONT AREA -Sam Smith Boaters Federation KEY ISSUE To provide the Water & Related Land Management Board with a status report on the efforts of the Sam Smith Boaters Federation in preparing a proposal for development of boating facilities by a club at Colonel Samuel Smith Park. Res. #67 Moved by: Ron Moran Seconded by: Brian Harrison IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the status report on the proposal preparation by the Sam Smith Boaters Federation for boating facilities at Colonel Samuel Smith Park, be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND At meeting #2/90, the Authority adopted the following resolution: "That staff be directed to suspend further consideration of a public marina and to negotiate with the Sam Smith Boaters Federation to make a proposal for development of the boating facilities by a club for further consideration by the Authority." The Authority forwarded a letter to some 550 people on the waiting list advising them of the Sam Smith Boaters Federation and an opportunity to become involved in the planning for the future boat club facilities. The Authority established a working group with representatives from The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Hans Sustronk (consulting engineers), Metro Toronto Parks and Property Department, Etobicoke Planning Department and the Sam Smith Boaters Federation. The initial meeting of this group was held on May 17, 1990 to provide direction to the boaters federation in preparing a master plan for Authority, Metro and Etobicoke approval. At the Water & Related Land Management Advisory Board meeting on June 29, 1990, representatives of the federation will provide a verbal report on their organizational and planning efforts to date and future timetable. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The working group, as outlined, will continue to meet during the formulation of a master plan for the Colonel Sam Smith boating facilities with a recommendation forwarded to the Authority at the completion of this process. 0-90 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #3/90 HELD JUNE 29. 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 11. PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REVIEW - 1989 KEY ISSUE The review of the 1989 program performance in achieving the adopted goals and objectives of the Authority is now complete. Res. #68 Moved by: Lois Hancey Seconded by: Maja Prentice IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the 1989 Program Performance Review, Appendix AM.16, be received for information. CARRIED TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:15 a.m., June 29, 1990. DON JACKSON W.A. McLEAN Chairman Secretary-Treasurer g . C\.. , the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes D-91 WATER AND RELATED LAND 21-SEPTEMBER-1990 #4/90 ;WAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD , . The.. Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board met in Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitors centre on Friday, September 21, 1990. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. PRESENT Chairman Don Jackson Vice Chairman Lois Griffin , Members Lois Hancey Brian Harrison Roger Hollander Marie Labatte Ron Moran Chairman of the Authority John McGinnis ABSENT Members Ila Bossons Maja Prentice Joyce Trimmer MINUTES Res. #69 Moved by: Ron Moran Seconded by: Brian Harrison THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/90 be approved. CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE Res. 170 Moved by: . Brian Harrison Seconded by: Lois Hancey THAT the letter from Douglas and Lorna Martin to Mayor G. Bruce Sinclair and Members of council, City of Etobicoke, re the need for a Centre for the Arts, be received. CARRIED D-92 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT - ADDENDUM -German Mills Creek at l6th Avenue Town of Richmond Hill KEY ISSUE An increase in the length of the culverts required, due to the proposed construction of a grade separation by the Region of York, necessitates a higher contribution by MTRCA th~n anticipated under the original Project. Res. #71 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Marie Labatte THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Addendum to the project for Flood Proteotion Works, 16th Avenue, German Mills Creek, Don River, Richmond Hill, Appendix WR.305 herewith, involving an increase in the total cost from $150,000 to $330,000 be approved, and that the following action be taken: 1. The Ministry of Natural Resources be requested to approve the Addendum including a grant of $181,500, that being 55% of the total project cost of $330,000. 2. The Regional Municipality of York be designated the benefiting municipality,- and asked to approve the Addendum and agree to a levy of $148,500, that being 45% of the total project cost of $330,000. 3. Pursuant to Section 24 of the Conservation Authorities Act, approval of the Addendum to the Project for Flood Protection Works 16th Avenue, German Mills Creek, Richmond Hill by the Ontario Municipal Board, be requested. 4. The appropriate officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action is required in connection with the Addendum to the Project, including the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Authority has an approved Project to participate in the construction of flood control works by the Region of York. The Authority's participation resulted from a concern that the capacity of the proposed culverts under 16th Avenue be increased from the 100 year flow, as proposed by the Region of York, to the regional flow. The Project, as originally proposed, did not include sufficient funding to extend the culverts to accommodate the recently proposed grade separated crossing at the railway tracks. Further background is outlined in the Addendum to the Project, Appendix WR.305. RATIONALE The Authority is anxious to achieve regional flow capacity throughout this section of the German Mills Creek. As the proposed culverts are at the upstream end of the critical area, it is essential that these structures also have regional flow capacity, to ensure that all of the flow can get into the new channel which is currently under construction by a downstream developer. D-93 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT - ADDENDUM -German Mills Creek at 16th Avenue Town of Richmond Hill CONTD. The Agreement between the Authority and the Region of York anticipated a future grade separation, and obligated the Authority to seek funding on the same basis to extend the culverts in the event that the grade separated crossing was built. ; DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The Region of York has already awarded the contract for construction of the culverts and the work is underway. Construction will be finished on the culverts in the spring of 1991. FINANCIAL DETAILS The Addendum to the Project for Flood Protection Works at l6th Avenue, German Mills Creek, Richmond Hill proposes a revised total cost of $330,000 to be financed as follows: Province of ontario $181,500 55% Regional Municipality of York 148,500 45% $150,000 is available in 1990 as proposed in the original project under Account No. 112-01. Requests for the remaining $180,000 have been made as part of the preliminary budget for 1991. 2. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL , SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITIES OF PEEL, YORK AND DURHAK: 1987-1991 -Proqress Report and Pool of Erosion sites KEY ISSUE Staff have prepared a progress report and a pool of priorities list, related to proposed future works for the Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization Projects in Metropolitan Toronto and the Regional Municipalities of Peel, York and Durham. Res. #72 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Marie Labatte THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the pool of priorities for the Projects for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the Regional Municipalities of Peel, York and Durham: 1987-1991, be approved as shown in Appendix WR.309 herewith. CARRIED 0-94 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL , SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITIES OF PEEL, YORK AND DURHAM: 1987-1991 -proqress Report and Pool of Erosion Sites CONTD. B~CKGROUND In view of the large number of sites requiring erosion control works, major remedial work is carried out on a technical priority basis defined by the degree of hazard associated with the problem. The technical priorities are reassessed at least once during our annual, exercise whereby all the sites on our inventory are visited and monitored. This review reflects the dynamics of the erosion processes and the addition of any new sites and, therefore, ensures that the works we are proposing for a given year are addressing technically the most hazardous sites within our area of jurisdiction. The degree of hazard is evaluated and priorities established for an erosion site, by considering the effects on the distance to structures, rate of erosion and the physical properties of the slope. The lists provided in Appendix WR.309 reflect the review and ranking carried out in the summer of 1990. These priority lists are used to determine what sites should be included with the Project File submissions to the Ministry of Natural Resources,- and in helping to formulate the 1991 preliminary budget for the erosion control program. 3. SPECIAL POLICY AREA DESIGNATION - REQUEST FOR PINAL APPROVAL -Town of Markham (Rouqe River Watershed) KEY ISSUE The Town of Markham is requesting, through Official Plan Amendment No. 100, a Special Policy Area designation, pursuant to the Provincial Flood Plain Planning Policy statement 1988, for flood plain lands within Unionville, Rouge River Watershed. ~ Res. #73 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Brian Harrison THB BOARD RBCOKKENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the request by the Town of Markham for Speoial Policy Area designation, as described within Official Plan Amenliaent No. 100, be approved; AND FURTHBR THAT the Ministry of Natural Resources, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs, the Region of York and the Town of Markham be so advised. CARRIED ----- D-95 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 14/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORiTY CONSIDERATION 3. SPECIAL POLICY AREA DESIGNATION - REQUEST FOR FINAL APPROVAL -Town of Markham (Rouqe River Watershed) CONTD. BACKGROUND At Meeting #7/89, October 27, 1989, the Authority re-endorsed the Town of Markham's initiative to designate flood-prone lands within unionville, Rouge River Watershed, as an Special Policy Area (SPA) pursuant to the Provincial Flood Plain Planning Policy Statement, 1988. The Authority'S approval stated: ; "Res. #224 "THAT the staff report advising of the Town of Markham's planning process to amend its current Official Plan and Zoning By-Laws with the intent to incorporate SPECIAL POLICY AREA policies pursuant to the provincial Flood Plain Planning Policy statement, 1988, be received for information; "AND FURTHER THAT the Authority re-endorse the Town's initiative in this regard." RATIONALE A two-zone approach to flood plain planning is currently implemented, through OPA No. 25, 1982, within this study area. site specific official plan amendments to obtain relief from two-zone floodproofing requirements prompted the Authority and MNR to request, in 1985, that the Town give consideration to an SPA designation. In addition, the extension of MTRCA flood plain mapping identified additional flood-prone lands of existing residential development. Desiqnation: Staff support the change in flood plain planning policies from the current two-zone approach to special Policy Area designation. The lands to be designated Special Policy Area have historically developed within the Rouge River Watershed, and form an integral part of an existing flood-prone community. New development and redevelopment is currently permitted within these flood plain lands in accordance with the current policies for the two-zone approach to flood plain planning. The SPA designation includes additional flood-prone lands where the two-zone approach does not currently apply. The addition of these areas has been supported by planning and engineering information. In addition, the extension of MTRCA flood plain mapping identified an existing flood-prone residential community. This community is conceptually shown to be designated Special Policy Area; however, the Town has requested a deferral until such time as flood plain limits and options for flood control remedial works are finalized. 0-96 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 3. SPECIAL POLICY AREA DESIGNATION - REgUEST FOR FINAL APPROVAL -Town of Markham (Rouae River Watershed) CONTD. policies: The flood plain planning policies outlined within OPA No. 100 have regard for the Provincial Flood Plain Planning Policy Statement, 1988 and MTRCA regulation administration guidelines for SPA's. In summary, the following development guidelines will be implemented: ; 1. New development, redevelopment, or extensions to and rehabilitation of existing buildings and structures may be permitted, provided that the proposed development is floodproofed to the level of the Regulatory Flood (Hurricane Hazel). Where it is not technically feasible, or is impractical to floodproof to the level of the Regulatory Flood, a lower level of floodproofing may be permitted. The minimum level of floodproofing required shall be the 1:350 flood event. 2. Markham Council reserves the right to protect from development any lands within the SPA which are needed to achieve open space, recreation and environmental protection objectives and policies of the official plan, and lands required by MTRCA for flood and erosion control remedial purposes. 3. All development applications will be accompanied by the appropriate engineering studies as required by MTRCA for review and approval. 4. Ingress and egress shall be "safe" pursuant to provincial policy and site specific flooding conditions. 5. Land use shall be determined by Markham Council based on Official Plan policies, existing use and existing zoning, adjacent land use designations, type and character of existing development within, and adjoining lands designated SPA, and the long term viability of the existing development. certain lands within the SPA have been identified for the sole purpose of the development of a public parking lot. Phase I of this development has been approved by the Authority pursuant to Ontario Regulation 293/86. 6. New development shall not be permitted within the SPA if: . the development would be subjected to a water velocity or depth which would create an unacceptable hazard to life, or the development would be susceptible to major structural damage as a result of a flood less than, or equal to, the Regulatory Flood . the necessary flood protection measures would have a negative impact. on adjacent properties D-97 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 3. SPECIAL POLICY AREA DESIGNATION - REQUEST FOR FINAL APPROVAL -Town of Markham (Rouqe River Watershed) CONTD. 7. The following uses shall be prohibited within the SPA: . elementary school, day care centre, hospital, nursing home, senior citizens housing, a home for the physically or mentally handicapped, other child care, or residential care facility; and, . an automobile service station or any development, which includes the storage, handling, production or use of a chemical, flammable, explosive, toxic, corrosive, or other dangerous material, and the treatment, collection or disposal of sewage; and, . a building or structure directly related to the distribution and delivery of an essential or emergency pUblic service, including police, fire, ambulance and electric power transmission. 8. Modifications to the boundaries of the SPA may be considered on the basis of flood or erosion control measures, approved by MTRCA. Such modifications, if approved by the Town, shall be adopted by amendment to the Official Plan. 9. Zoning By-Law Amendments to implement the SPA have been reviewed by staff and are acceptable. 10. Before building permits are issued, MTRCA approval pursuant to its Fill Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulations, is required. 11- The implementation of floodproofing and all other requirements of MTRCA shall be a condition of development approval by the Town. 12. Future By-Law Amendment's within the SPA shall contain all necessary provisions as required by MTRCA and the Town. D-98 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 4. VISION 2020 - A PLAN FOR THE MISSISSAUGA WATERFRONT -Draft. June. 1990 Mr. steven Connelly, Waterfront Planner, City of Mississauga, was heard at this time. KEY ISSUE To report to the Board on the "Vision 2020 - A Plan for the Mississauga Waterfront - Draft, June 1990." Res. #74 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Roger Hollander THE BOARD RECOMHENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to prepare a report on "Vision 2020 - A Plan for the Mississauga Waterfront", for consideration by the Board at its meeting on October 12, 1990, and that the city of Mississauga be advised that the Authority will provide comments as soon as possible thereafter. CARRIED BACKGROUND - See Appendix WR. 369 herewith. 5. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL , SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1987-1991 -Proposed Slope Stabilization Works at the rear of 8-10 BurqandY Court in the city of North York (Humber River Watershed) KEY ISSUE To construct slope stabilization works at the rear of Nos. 8-10 Burgandy Court in the City of North York. Res. 1175 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: John MCGinnis THE BOARD RECOMHENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to proceed with the construction of the erosion control works at the rear of Nos. 8-10 Burgandy Court, city of North York, under the Project for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto: 1987- 1991 at a total estimated cost of $150,000. Amendment Moved by: Brian Harrison Res. #76 Seconded by: Marie Labatte AND FURTHER THAT the owners of Nos. 8-10 Burgandy Court, City of North York, provide temporary and work easements, as required, over that portion of their properties where the works are carried out by the MTRCA or their agents. THE AMENDMENT WAS........................................... CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS............................CARRIED D-99 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 5. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL , SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1987-1991 -Proposed Slope Stabilization Works at the rear of 8-10 Burgandy Court in the city of North York (Humber River Watershed} CONTD. BACKGROUND At Authority meeting #4/90 unde7 Resolution #108 recommended: , THAT staff be directed to proceed with the construction of the erosion control works at the rear of Nos. 8-10 Burgandy Court, City of North York, under the Project for Erosion Control and Slope stabilization in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto: 1987-1991 at a total estimated cost of $242,500; THAT the owners of 8-10 Burgandy Court contribute $15,650 towards the cost of the works; AND FURTHER THAT the owners provide permanent easements over that portion of their property where the works are carried out. The fully engineered slope buttress which the above represents is the option staff felt the home owners would ultimately select, since it had a higher factor of safety and provided the residents with a usable rear yard. This included complete regrading and flattening of the slope by placement of fill over the full height of the slope and providing drainage. However, after lengthy negotiations the residents chose another alternative which we had presented. This alternative only involves the construction of a berm at the toe of the slope and some minor grading of the upper slope, but still provides an adequate factor of safety, while minimizing the loss of trees through the middle portion of the valley slope. Therefore, staff is prepared to recommend this alternative as it is technically sound and less costly. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The proposed remedial work involves constructing a berm at the toe of the valley slope with some minor regrading and planting of the upper portion of the slope. The placement of the berm at the toe of the slope will secure the slope against deep-seated failure. The estimated cost to carry out this work is as follows: Activitv Cost 1- Survey and Legal $ 2,500 2. Access preparation and maintenance 25,000 3. Sediment control 5,000 4. Clearing and grubbing 5,000 5. Construction of berm and minor grading on the upper slope 89,500 6. Restoration and Revegetation lO,OOO 7. Contingencies approximately 10% 13,000 Total $150,000 --------- D-100 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 5. PROJECT FOR EROSION CONTROL , SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO: 1987-1991 -Proposed Slope Stabilization Works at the rear of 8-10 Burgandy Court in the City of North York (Humber River Watershed) CONTD. FINANCIAL DETAILS Project policy states, where private property is benefiting directly from the proposed works that the own~r(s) must agree to make a suitable contribution towards the cost of the works by way of money and/or lands. In this case, al1 of the heavy construction is on public land therefore no contribution is required. However, the owners will be required to execute our standard indemnification agreement. Funds for this project will be available under the Authority's Erosion Control Slope Stabilization Project for the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. D-101 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION III - ITEMS FOR REFERRAL TO ANOTHER BOARD 6. 1991 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES Res. #77 Moved by: Lois Griffin Seconded by: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOKKENDS to the Finance and Administration Advisory Board that the 1991 preliminary Estimates, Appendix FA.199, be referred to the Executive Committee for approval. ; CARRIED 0-102 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 7. TOKMY THOMPSON PARK -1990 Gull Control KEY ISSUE As part of the requirement for the wildlife control contract, the consultant submitted a report on the 1990 Ring-billed Gull Control Program. Res. #78 Moved by: ; Brian Harrison Seconded by: Marie Labatte THAT the consultant report on the Rinq-billed Gull Control Program at Tommy Thompson Park - 1990, Appendix WR.334, be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board Meeting #7/89, the 1990 Interim Management Program was received. Included in the report was the proposal to undertake control of the Ring-billed Gulls on site, similar to the operations that occurred in 1985-1989. In 1989 it was proposed to tender the program as a two-year contract. As a result, staff prepared a terms of reference for the program and received approval from the Ministry of Natural Resources, Central Region. The 1989-1990 program was tendered to a number of wildlife control companies, and Bird Control International was awarded the contract for 1989-1990. The control program commenced on March 26, 1990 and continued until June 8, 1990. The control areas were the new endikement, the areas south of the main road, and Area D. The program utilized the same methods as in previous years which include: (i) falconry; (ii) pyrotechnical devices; (iii) mock gulls; and (iv) distress calls. RATIONALE The rationale for restricting Ring-billed Gull habitat is to allow for continued construction of the site, to maintain all options for the planning decision of the master plan, and to maintain the significant biological amenities of Tommy Thompson Park. FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS The following recommendation was provided by the consultant for the Authority's consideration: "It cannot be anticipated that the Ring-billed Gull numbers will stay at this years low level; therefore, it is recommended that the program be continued in its proven form with the suggestion that it be continued about 14 days longer since the ovulation period for Ring- billed Gulls is not quite over by the beginning of June" Staff will review the report and recommendations to assist in the proposal for the 1991 Interim Management Program at Tommy Thompson Park. D-10J WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 8. TOMMY THOMPSON PARK -1990 Interim Manaaement Proqram KEY ISSUE As part of the Interim Management Program at Tommy Thompson Park, staff has prepared a report outlining the activities and events that have occurred during the 1990 season. Res. #79 Moved by: : Brian Harrison Seconded by: Marie Labatte THAT the staff report, Appendix WR.366, on the 1990 Interim Manaqement Program at Tommy Thompson Park, be received for information. CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board Meeting #7/89, the 1990 Interim Management Program was received. The following briefly outlines the regular activities and special events that occurred during the 1990 season. The park was open to the public Saturdays, Sundays and holidays from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. commencing January 6th. Public transportation was provided during public hours from April 28th until October 8th. Two mUlti-seating passenger vehicles were in operation from April 28th to May 27th and from September 8th to October 8th. During the summer months of June, July, and August, a special summer bus service provided by the Toronto Transit Commission was in operation. A nature interpretive program continued in 1990 and operated from June 2nd until September 3rd. This year's program offered a theme hike on Sundays and holidays centring on different aspects of the park's natural history, and a general interest hike on Saturdays. Overall attendance for the hikes increased significantly from 1989, with many visitors being informed of the hikes through news releases. The special bird checklist at the information board was again in use for park visitors and proved to be very popular for bird watchers. - The Tommy Thompson Park Newsletter continued its circulation, with issues prepared for March, May, and August. This newsletter has given the Authority the opportunity to highlight special events, regular programs and announcements. In addition, the newsletter was utilized to inform all visitors of the progress being made with the master planning process for Tommy Thompson Park. D-104 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 8. TOMMY THOMPSON PARK -1990 Interim Manaqement Proqram CONTD. In the interest of visitor safety, security and access, a staff member has been on duty at all times during public hours. It is expected that this practice will continue for 1991. Staff is of the opinion that the 1990 program was successful in providing public access year round, as well as providing Authority staff on site to give any information or assistance as required. FUTURE BENEFITS/PROBLEMS Staff will be reviewing the program and activities of the 1990 Interim Management Program and will be preparing the 1991 Interim Management Program on a similar basis. This will be brought to the Board at the next meeting. 9. FISHERIES SURVEY OF THE EAST BAYFRONT PORT INDUSTRIAL AREA -MTRCA Report for the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront KEY ISSUE A report on the fisheries survey of the East Bayfront Port Industrial Area has been prepared and forwarded to the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront. Res. #80 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Marie Labatte THAT the executive summary of the report 'Fisheries Survey of the East Bayfront Port Industrial Area', Appendix WR.376 herewith, prepared for the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront by the Authority, be received for information. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, on behalf of the Royal Commission on the future of the Toronto Waterfront, conducted a fisheries survey of the East Bayfront Port Industrial Area. The Royal Commission is presently undertaking a two-phased environmental audit, designed to develop the best possible description and understanding of the environmental conditions of the East Bayfront Port Industrial Area. This survey was conducted in order to augment the existing knowledge and understanding of the fisheries resource in the area. 0-105 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #4/90 HELD SEPTEMBER 21. 1990 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 9. FISHERIES SURVEY OF THE EAST BAYFRONT PORT INDUSTRIAL AREA -MTRCA Report for the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront CONTD. The survey was concerned with assessing the fOllowing environmental conditions: 1) Fish Habitat Document the subst~ate types along the north shore of the outer Harbour and determine the extent of physical and spawning habitat present. 2) FiSh community Document the fish communities present within the wave zone and near shore areas, along the north shore of the Outer Harbour and the near shore areas of the Turning Basin, Keating Channel and Coatsworth's Cut. 3) Creel Census Document the human use of the fishery resource within the study area. The East Bayfront Port Industrial Area is a unique combination of environmental conditions. The channels and docks associated with the port facilities represent the most degraded fish habitat and fish communities found along the Toronto waterfront. Fish communities within these areas lack the stable environment necessary for the development of stable resident fish populations. East Point Park Master Plan/Environmental Assessment Public Meetinq Date: Wednesday, November 14, 1990 Place: Meeting Hall (Counoil Chambers) Civic centre, City of Scarborough 150 Borough Drive, Scarborough Time: 7:30 p.m. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:35 a.m., September 21, 1990 Don Jackson W.A. McLean Chairman Secretary-Treasurer G C\.. , 0-106 the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes WATER AND RELATED LAND 23-NOVEMBER-1990 #5/90 MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD The Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board met in Black Creek pioneer village Visitors Centre on Friday, November 23, 1990. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. PRESENT Chairman Don Jackson vice Chairman ; Lois Griffih Members Ila Bossons Lois Hancey Brian Harrison Roger Hollander Marie Labatte Ron Moran Maja Prentice Joyce Trimmer Chairman of the Authority John McGinnis Vice Chairmiln of the Authority Gordon Patterson MINUTES Res. #81 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Brian Harrison THAT the Minutes of MeetincJ #4/90 be approved. CARRIED DELEGATIONS Res. #82 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Ron Moran THAT the Advisory Board hear a presentation from Mrs. Eileen Mayo, Toronto Field Naturalists on item 2 of these Minutes "East Point Park - Metro Sportsfield Facility". CARRIED 0-107 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 CORRESPONDENCE (a) Letter from the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront. dated November 15. 1990 Res. #83 Moved by: Lois Griffin Seconded by: Marie Labatte THAT the letter from the Hoyal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront, dated November 15, 1990, in connection with Recommendations 61 and 62 of the Watershed Report. clarifying that the land on the Leslie street Spit currently own(ld and administered by the MTRCA, is to remain under the control of the MTRCA, be received for information. CARRIED (b) Letter from Councillor Bev Salmon. dated 19 November. 1990 Res. #84 Moved by: Lois Hancey Seconded by: Marie Labatte THAT the letter from Councillor Bev Salmon, dated November 19, 1990, requesting that the west branch of the Don River in Hogg's Hollow be dredged to improve water flow and capacity, be received and referred to staff for report back to the Advisory Board. CARRIED (e) Letter from Councillor Joan Kinq. dated November 12. 1990 Res. #85 Moved by: Maja Prentice Seconded by: Roger Hollander THAT the letter from Councillor Joan King, dated November 12, 1990, on the subject of encroachment problems in Seneca Heights, be received and referred to staff for report back to the Advisory Board. CARRIED (d) Letters concerninq East Point Park - Metro Soortsfield Facility Res. #86 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Lois Hancey THAT the' letters from Diana Banville, dated June 6, 1990; Mary Cumming, dated October 7, 1990; Jane Brooke, dated October 17, 1990; Toronto Field Naturalists, dated November 1990; Anne C. Smith, dated November 1, 1990; Richard Aaron, dated November 1, 1990; Joan O'Donnell, dated November 11, 1990; Jacqueline Dineen dated November 12, 1990; Sheila Van Landeghem dated November 13, 1990; "Marilyn Murphy dated November 13, 1990; Marie L. Hunt dated November 13, 1990; G.V. Altpeter dated November l6, 1990; Elayne and Philip Wiegand dated November 18, 1990; Ms. Jean Macdonald dated November 19, 1990; and Molly Campbell dated November 21, 1990, expressing opposition to the East Point Park - Metro Sportsfield Facility, be received. CARRIED 0-108 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTlIORITY CONSIDERATION 1. COLONEL SAMUEL SMITlI WATERFRONT AREA -Sam Smith Boaters Federation The Advisory Board heard presentations from Keith Woolford and Paul Sandiford of the Sam Smith Boaters Federation, and Ken Cohen, Director of Physical Resources, Humber College, on the conceptual master plan for the small craft component of the Colonel Sam Smith Waterfront Park. KEY ISSUE , To consider a proposal by the Sam Smith Boaters Federation to develop the small craft component of t.he Colonel Samuel smith Waterfront Park. Res. #87 Moved by: Brian Harrison Seconded by: Marie Labatte THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the proposal by the Sam Smith Boaters Federation, Appendix WR.381, be approved in principle, subject to approval of the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto; THAT the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be requested to approve of the proposal by the Sam smith Boaters Federation; THAT the Sam Smith Boaters Federation be requested to finalize a master plan for the site in discussion with Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department and Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff, which plan will ultimately be approved as a schedule to the leases with each member group of the Federation; THAT the City of Etobicoke be requested to develop an appropriate zoning by-law for this waterfront park, on the basis of the Federation master plan and in conformity with the "Open Space" designation in the Etobicoke Official Plan; THAT the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be requested to negotiate leases with the member groups of the Federation; THAT the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be requested to submit the final leases to the Authority for approval, in accordance with the master agreement for Waterfront Development between MTRCA and Metropolitan Toronto; THAT the Minister of the Environment be advised that the Authority has suspended any further consideration of a public marina concept for this site, and is proceeding to implement a boating federation in accordance with the Colonel Samuel Smith Master Plan Environmental Assessment Approval - December 1980. CARRIED 0-109 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #S/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTUORITY CONSIDERATION 1. COLONEL SAMUEL SMITU WATERFRONT AREA -Sam Smith Boaters Federation CONTD. BACKGROUND At meeting #2/90, the Authority adopted the following resolution: "THAT staff be directed to suspend further consideration of a public marina and to negotiate ~ith the Sam Smith Boaters Federation to make a proposal for development of the boating facilities by a club for further consideration by the Authority." The Authority established a working group with representatives from the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Hans Sustronk (consulting engineer), Metro Toronto Parks and Property Department and Etobicoke Planning Department. The initial meeting of this group was held on May 17, 1990, to provide direction to the Boaters Federation in preparing the boating concept for Authority and Metropolitan Toronto approval. During the summer, the Authority circulated a letter and questionnaire on behalf of the Federation to assist in consolidating their membership. In early October the Group met with the Federation to review preliminary master plans for Sam Smith. The Working Group then provided detailed comments on allocation of club(s), public access, dock configuration, buildings, winter storage, security, shoreline treatment, roads/parking, fire safety, municipal services, phasing, live-aboards, site drainage and visitors' dock. It was agreed by the Sam Smith Working Group, in accordance with previous Federation negotiations on the Metro Waterfront, to set up an interview process with the MTRCA and Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department. The Interview Committee included the following: Larry Field, MTRCA; Brian Denney, MTRCA; Don Prince, MTRCA; Christopher Roberts, Deputy Commissioner, Planning and Development; Frank Kershaw, Director, Planning and Research Division; Ray Biggart, Deputy Commissioner, Operations; Victor Portelli, Director, Operations Division; Dave Skelley, Operations Division, Western District; William Donald, Director, Real Estate Division. The Sam Smith Boaters Federation was requested to attend an interview on November 12, 1990 and address the following points: . list of officers . membership list . federation organization . review of federation charter insurance . basic requirements of lease . banking/audit procedures . financial plan/expenditures/revenues . incorporation of club(s) . legal advice A proposa 1 , Sam Smith Boaters Federation Conceptual Master Plan for the Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Area, Appendix WR.381, was prepared. This proposal was presented to the federation membership on October 30, 1990 at the Lakeshore Collegiate Institute in Etobicoke, and received the sanction and approval of the membership. D-110 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. COLONEL SAMUEL SMITH WATERFRONT AREA -Sam Smith Boaters Federation CONTD. The proposal by the Federation is as follows: · provide a community-run boating facility in accordance with specific objectives (see proposal, Appendix WR.381) · two boating clubs (250 :slips each) and the Humber College Sailing Centre (see proposal, Concept Master Plan) · continuous public access around the boating basin · shared haul-out and launch facility · controlled vehicular access to the Federation's lease site · allocation of land and water areas for the club(s) and Humber College sailing Centre The Interview Committee, upon review of the proposal, was in agreement with the "federation" concept. In addition, the proposal demonstrated that the Federation was sufficiently organized, that the membership commitment existed at this stage, and that all points outlined by the Authority for the interview, were addressed to the satisfaction of the Interview Committee. Furthermore, the Interview Committee agreed that the Federation should proceed to seek the necesBary approvals. WORK '1'0 BE DONE Upon approval in principle by the Authority, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto will be requested to approve the Sam Smith Boaters Federation proposal. The Federation will then be requested to prepare a master plan for the site in discussion with Metro Parks and Property Department and MTRCA staff. The City of Etobicoke will be requested to prepare a zoning by-law for this site in conformity with the Open Space designation in the Etobicoke Official Plan and the Sam smith Boaters Federation Master Plan. The final leases, with the Federation Master Plan to be appended for each member club, will be negotiated by Metropolitan Toronto and submitted to the Authority for approval. The Minister of the Environment should be advil3ed that the Authority has suspended further consideration of a public marina at this site, and is proceeding to implement a boating federation concept in accordance with the Colonel Samuel Smith Master Plan Environmental Assessment Approval, December 1980. 0-111 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. EAST POINT PARK -Metro Soortsfield Facility Eileen Mayo of the Toronto Field Naturalists appeared before the Advisory Board, and on behalf of the Toronto Field Naturalists expressed strong concerns and opposition to the proposed Metro Sportsfield facility in the environmentally sensitive area of East Point Park. Mr. Frank Kershaw, Director, Planning and Research Division, Metro Parks and Property Department, made a presentation on the issue. KEY ISSUE To consider the approval )-equest by the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for the proposed r.egional sportsfiel~ facilities at East Point Park. Res. #88 Moved by: Joyce Trimmer Seconded by: Lois Griffin THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO TilE AUTHORITY THAT the Metropolitan Toronto Sportsfield facility proposed for East Point Park be approved: THAT the Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department submit detailed plans of the sportsfield facility, wildflower initiatives, and extension of the existing woodlot, to the MTRCA for staff review and approval; AND FURTHER THAT the Authority's comments be forwarded to the Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department. ON A RECORDED VOTE YEA NAY Don Jackson Ila Bossons Lois Griffin Roger Hollander Lois Hancey Marie Labatte Maja Prentice Joyce Trimmer John McGinnis THE MOTION WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1970, the MTRCA was designated as the implementing agency for Metropolitan Toronto, Pickering and Ajax sections of the 1967 Waterfront Plan (Waterfront Plan for the Metropolitan Toronto Planning Area - 1967). A functional planning study of the Scarborough Sector was completed in 1972, including the preparation of master plans for three waterfront parks: Bluffers, cathedral/cudia/Sylvan and East Point. The East Point Park Master Plan (community recreation facilities and washrooms, artificial swimming lake and change house, marina/launching ramps) was incorporated into "The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Waterfront Plan, 1972-1982. Metropolitan Council subsequently approved the East Point Park Master Plan on June 27, 1972, subject to "detailed working drawings for installations in the various areas being reviewed by Parks Department officials prior to construction to ensure that future operation of the park areas may be carried out at a realistic cost related to the entire regional system of Metropolitan Toronto". 0-112 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING ~5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. EAST POINT PARK -Metro SDortsfield Facility CONTD. In 1978, the Authority inLtiated a thorough review of the 1972 plan, due to the elapsed period of time prior to seeking approvals and starting construction. An updated Master Plan was released in January, 1980, including site details arul design of the main park elements: community park (two baseball diamon(ls, two soccer fields and change rooms), trout pond, model boat and train area, group picnicking and small craft harbour (400 slips and launching ramps). On December 14, 1981, Scarborough Council approved the East Point Park Master Plan Update and site Preparation Study. The approved "10-Year Concept Plan of Major Recreation Facilities" adopted by Metropolitan Council on December 6, 1983, identified increased adult level sports pursuits such as softball and slo-pitch. It was further indicated that additional diamonds would be required, throughout Metropolitan Toronto, to address the growing facility needs of these sports. Critical to the supply of such facilities was the requirement of serviced land, out of the floodplain, where multiple diamond facilities could be constructed. In this regard, the plan noted the potential for sports facilities in East Point south of Copperfield Road between Beechgrove Drive and Manse Road. Report 13 of the Parks and Recreation and Property Committee, as adopted by Metropolitan Council on September 26, 1990, indicated that across Metropolitan Toronto there are approximately 5000 players trying to join a league team. It is estimated that there is need for some fifty additional regulation floodlit diamonds to address current unsatisfied demands. Scarborough's Recreation and Parks and Social Development Committee report, as adopted by Council on Monday, July 16, 1990, Lndicated a deficiency for slo-pitch diamonds of 10,113 requested hours or 14 new lit facilities, and 53 new lit facilities for adult slo-pitch now accommodated on facilities not designed for that level of play. Scarborough is proposing to construct five slo-pitch and one baseball diamond in the period 1991-1993. The report also noted that there is only one baseball facility east of Markham Road in the entire city. The park is on disturbed land adjacent to the Easterly Water Filtration Plant, CNR Rail lines and Coronation Industrial Park. The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority now holds title to the lands (59 hectares or 147 acres) and is responsible for its planning and development, save and except the proposed sportsfield facilities (7 hectares or 17 acres) which have been identified as a Metropolitan Toronto responsibility. Metropolitan staff discussed their plans with Ministry of Environment - Environmental Assessment Branch staff, and on April 3, 1990 received correspondence from the Ministry advising that the sportsfield facility would not be subject to the requirements of an individual environmental assessment and approval by the Minister of the Environment. The proposal is a four-diamond complex in a pinwheel or carousel shape which minimizes land requirements, provides easy pedestrian access, allows efficient site servicing and maintenance, and can be easily screened from other park uses. 0-113 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. EAST POINT PARK -Metro Sportsfield Facility CaNTO. At its meeting in September 26, 1990, the Council of the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto adopted the following resolution: l. Subject to the approval of the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the proposed regional sports field facilities at East Point Park CIS nOled herein be approved; 2. The development of the above noted facilities be undertaken as a capital project in the amount of $4,000,000; the Commissioner of Finance has advised that this expenditure can be financed by the issuance of debentures and has certified that funds can be provided under existing Ontario Municipal Board Bulk Order No. E890225; 3. The consulting firm of Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited be retained to provide the necef;sary consulting services for the above noted project, to an upset of $204,000 exclusive of disbursements and any required resident site inspection during construction; and 4. The appropriate Metropolitan Officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary actions to take effect thereto. In 1977, the Authority carried out vegetation and faunal inventories. It was noted that "a large portion of the land adjacent to the conservation sites at the extreme eastern (Highland Sewage Treatment Plant) and western ends (Easterly Filtration Plant) has been disturbed by land clearing, bulldozing and filling". ESA #125 contained in the Authority's Environmentally Significant Areas Report, recognized portions of the East Point Park site as having significant prairie plant species such as White Bottle Gentian (Gentiana andrewsii f. albiflora) . It was also noted that the East Point is a land mark for migrating birds because of its position on the shore of Lake Ontario and variety of habitat types. Shrub, woodland and natural meadow communities of the area provide excellent cover and food sources for migratory birds. On September 29, October 11 and October 27, 1989, the Authority updated the vegetation and botanical information for East Point. In the area of the proposed sportsfield facilities, no provincially rare or regionally significant species were recorded. South of the woodlots towards the bluff, the old field community does include the regionally rare "white form of bottle gentian (Gentiana andrewsii) ". The sportsfield facilities would not remove any habitat that is not already well represented in other portions of East Point. A limited number of plants have colonized in this area from the main community, since the inventories in 1977 and preparation of the Environmentally Significant Areas report. D-114 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #S/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. EAST POINT PARK -Metro Soortsfield Facility CONTD. WORK TO BE DONE In general, there exists a need for a Metropolitan Toronto park staff presence at East Point to control the existing illegal dumping, off-road vehicle use and wildflower destruction. There is an opportunity through this project to ensure a "net environmental gain." , Metropolitan Toronto has ilgreed to work with Authority staff to undertake the following efforts to enhance the site environmental characteristics: . to enhance the sustainability of the white bottle gentian community consistent with the Metro Parks wildflower initiativeu . prepare plans to utilize appropriate native trees indigenous to the area in the landscaping of the sportsfield facility, to enhance habitat value. 3. CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY KEY ISSUE To develop a Corporate Communications strategy to support the Authority's Greenspace Strategy. Res. #89 Move4 by: Marie Labatte Seconde4 by: John McGinnis ~.. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Corporate Communications Strategy, dated October 26, 1990, Appendix AM.146, be received and approve4i AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority staff be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give offect thereto. CARRIED BACKGROUND The successful implementation of the Greenspace strategy requires a review and update of all support programs. The Corporate Communications Strategy provides a framework for communicating to our audiences the programs and services reflected in the Authority Mission Statement. The strategy, which consolidates in a single document the existing Authority communications programs, policies and procedures, has had extensive input and been endorsed by both program and management staff. Appendix AM.146 is a summary of the Strategy. The detailed Corporate Communications Strategy Goals, Plans, Actions, and Results are available from the Community Relations Section. 0-115 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTIlORITY CONSIDERATION 3. CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY CONTD. The strategy is an integrated communication planning process incorporating three major components: . The strategic Plan - visionary, long-range, a framework for communications planning; . Operations/Impl~mentation Plan - individual plans, strategies and activities to achieve objectives within a certain time frame; and . Results Analysis - a system of review to monitor how we are performing in relation to communications missions and goals. The Corporate Communications strategy, as with other Authority strategies, will require regular updating. FINANCIAL DETAILS The costs and financing to implement the Corporate Communications strategy will be similar to those approved in the 1990 Budget and the 1991 Preliminary Estimates. Any significant increases in funding will be as a result of new initiatives and be determined when the project is adopted. 4. ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES OF ONTARIO CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR WATER MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES KEY ISSUE The Minister of the Environment has denied the Association of Conservation Authorities of Ontario's CACAO) request for a five year extension of the approval of the Class Environmental Assessment for Water Management structures. The ACAO must have an approved, amended Class EA in place prior to the expiry of the existing Class EA on December 12, 1990, and the ACAO must develop a new Class EA, to be in place by December 1992. Res. #90 Moved by: Maja Prentice Seconded by: Lois Hancey THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the following summary of actions regarding the Class Environmental Assessment for Water Management structure., and Report #43 of the Environmental Assessment Advisory Committee, Appendix WR.411, be received for information. CARRIED 0-116 WATER AND RELATED L~ MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTUORITY CONSIDERATION 4. ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES OF ONTARIO CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR WATER MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES CONTD. BACKGROUND The stated purpose of the Class EA for Water Management structures is "to define one planning and design process to minimize the environmental effects associated with the reduction or elimination of water management problems." It applies to projects that address problems associated with flooding, erosion and sedimentation, and having construction costs ranging between $175,000 and $2.7 million. This includes channel alterations and bank stabilization, dykes, dams, impoundments and weirs, and shoreline protection structures undertaken by Conservation Authorities and, less frequently, by municipalities. Projects with construction costs less than $175,000 do not require any environmental assessment unless the Minister so designates; those projects with construction costs greater than $2.7 million require an individual environmental assessment. The Class EA was developed by the ACAO and was approved under the Environmental Assessment Act on December 12, 1985 for a five year period. This approval required the ACAO to submit a new Class EA for approval by December, 1989 or to request a waiver of this requirement for re-submission. On September 27, 1989 the ACAO wrote to the Minister of the Environment requesting the latter option and that approval for the existing Class EA be extended for a five year period to December 1995, subject to changes identified in a review of the Class EA. In response to the ACAO's request, the Ministry of the Environment conducted a lengthy review, including consultation with the Environmental Assessment Advisory Committee (EAAC) . "Report #43 of the Environmental Assessment Advisory Committee" compiles the review comments made by a number of individuals and organizations. These comments address concerns for the effectiveness of the Class EA, the effectiveness of the process set out in the Class EA, and ACAO's request to extend the Class EA. On September 6, 1990 the Honourable Jim Bradley, Minister of the Environment, denied the ACAO's request to extend the approval of the Class EA for a further five years. The Minister adopted the following three recommendations of the Environmental Assessment Advisory Committee: Recommendation 11 - A new class environmental assessment for water management should be developed by the Conservation Authorities in order to ensure improvements in the following areas: . meeting the requirements for the f.A Act, including full consideration of alternatives, meaningful public and agency notification and consultation, assessment of environmental impacts and monitoring of impacts; . strengthening and clarifying the relationships among the Class EA, watershed plans and water quality concerns;, and - D-1l7 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTJlORITY CONSIDERATION 4. ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES OF ONTARIO CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR WATER MAN~GEMENT STRUCTURES CONTD. Recommendation #2 - In the interim while a new Class EA is being developed, the existing Class EA for Water Management structures should be extended until no later than December 1992 with amendments whiGh: ; . strengthen public notification and involvement; . ensure full consideration of the "do nothing" and non-structural alternatives and full justification for the need for the structural alternative; . revise the text to reflect adequately the potential significance of project impacts; and . strengthen monitoring of impacts during and after construction and ensure mitigation of these impacts. There should be no further extensions beyond 1992. Recommendation #3 - The ACAO and the Ministry of the Environment should develop the amendments referred to in recommendation #2 in consultation with submitters to the EAAC review, with at least one initial meeting prior to October 15 to discuss draft amendments. With regard to recommendation #1, a new Class EA must be developed by the ACAO and in place by December 1992. To accomplish this task, Mr. Russ Powell, Executive Director of the ACAO, expects to hire a full-time staff person. In addition to the I~C's recommendation #2 regarding the need for an interim, amended EA, the Minister has stipulated that amendments be included to address the following: . revise the text to reflect changes to Federal and Provincial policies and legislation; . amend the "provision for Phasing In of Ongoing Undertakings" (Chapter 8) to apply to the phase-in of the amended Class EA; . revise the text to show the revised upper and lower project costs; and . amend the requirement for an annual list to be prepared and advertised for water management undertakings costing less than $175,000 with suitable mention of the "bump-up" procedure, to require mandatory submission along with documentation respecting how it was advertised, to the Director of the EA Branch. D-118 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 4. ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES OF ONTARIO CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR WATER MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES CONTD. To avoid expiry of the existing Class EA, final, Minister approved amendments, must be in place by December 12, 1990. Given this deadline, the ACAO would have had to submit its amendments of the existing Class EA to the Ministry by November 1, 1990 to allow adequate time for review. The limited time available for dev~loping amendments meant that the process would have been accomplished "in-house" with no public consultation. As a preferred alternative, the ACAO has chosen to request an extension of the expiry date of the existing Class EA. The extension will allow for a more consultative process with interested groups for drafting the amendments. Approval for the extension to the expiry date must be granted by December 12, 1990, otherwise the Class EA will expire and all new Authority projects will be subject to individual EAs. On October 16, 1990 a meeting of the Ministry of the Environment, ACAO, and interested groups was held to discuss the amendments to the existing Class EA. The ACAO and interested groups in attendance at the meeting agreed that the extension of the expiry date should be sought on the following conditions: a) no new projects be initiated under the existing Class EA process by member Authorities or Municipalities until an amended Class EA is approved by Cabinet; and b) final amendments be submitted to the Minister for consideration by March 1, 1991. In compliance with the EAAC's third recommendation, a Liaison Committee has been formed to work with the ACAO in the development of amendments to the existing Class EA. This Committee, selected by the MOE (EA Branch), consists of five individuals representing a diversity of interests. The ACAO has requested that each Conservation Authority provide a list of Environmental study Reports, currently being prepared under the Class EA. study reports not approved by the Ministry of the Environment by December 12, 1990 will be subject to a "phase-in" to an amended Class EA. A list of three Environmental study Reports of this nature, being prepared by the MTRCA which will be allowed to proceed, is included in Appendix WR.411. Since the MTRCA has several multi-year projects already in progress, our work program for the next two years will not be affected, provided that a new Class EA is in place by December 1992. Any projects for 1993, for which the Class EA process must be initiated in 1992, will likely be subject to a phase-in provision to the new Class E.A. Internally, MTRCA staff is conducting a review of the existing process followed for projects under the Class EA. In particular, MTRCA staff will review the interim requirements for increased public notification, monitoring, and consideration of the "do nothing" approach. Staff will consider the issues raised by the EAAC and will forward recommendations to the ACAO for addressing these issues. MTRCA staff will report back to the Advisory Board at a later date, with an update on decisions made by the Minister and MTRCA recommendations to the ACAO. 0-119 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 5. VISION 2020 -A Plan for the Mississauqa Waterfront KEY ISSUE To report on the "Vision 2020 - A Plan For The Mississauga Waterfront _ Draft, June 1990. Res. #91 Moved by: ; Marie Labatte Seconded by: I1a Bossons THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the MTRCA support the concept of Marie Curtis Park, as a major regional waterfront park or activity centre at the western boundary of the Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront and eastern edge of the Mississauga Waterfront; THAT to achieve the concept of a major regional waterfront park, the acquisition of the Canada Post property and integration with the management of Marie Curtis Park, as outlined in the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront - Interim Report, be supported; THAT the small craft harbour be deleted from the Vision 2020 Plan, with further consideration by the Authority deferred until the new Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront Plan is formulated and new provincial lakefill policies are established; THAT the lakefill elements of the Vision 2020 Plan be subject to the comments on "lakefill" in the Watershed Report - Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront; THAT the City of Mississauga be requested to obtain input from The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto waterfront, and the City of Etobicoke, in the preparation of the "Implementation Document"; AND FURTHER THAT the City of Mississauga, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront, the Special Advisor to the Premier on Toronto Waterfront Development, and the City of Etobicoke, be advised of the Authority's comments. CARRIED 0-120 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 5. VISION 2020 -A Plan for the Misuissauqa Waterfront CONTD. BACKGROUND Vision 2020 Plan (draft) was developed on "planning concepts" which addressed: . continuous public access to the waters edge . natural places ~long the shoreline . improved water quality and appearance of the shoreline. These planning concepts defined waterfront spaces which offer different opportunities for waterfront activities and experiences: . window - access and views to the lake . local access node - lake access to the neighbourhood . regional access node - more land base for unstructured activities - parking and picnicking . natural areas - particular environmental characteristics or ecological significance . activity centre - access node which is a point of concentration or a focus for activities . linkages - connection and transition between waterfront open spaces and to the community In assessing the Mississauga waterfront for boating facilities the following criteria were applied: . suitable access . compatibility with public use of waterfront . shoreline protection requirements . compatibility with adjacent land - uses . requirements for lakefill . alteration of shoreline processes . loss of terrestrial and aquatic habitat The draft Vision 2020 Plan, based on the application of the above planning concepts and criteria, proposed that the existing Marie Curtis Park be enhanced to function aa a major activity centre. This would be accomplished through 1) the acquisition of the Canada Post property (15ha) and 2) lakefill to create a small craft harbour for approximately 500 boats. The Interim Report - August 1990 (Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront) indicates that the draft Mississauga Waterfront Plan's "general orientation appears consistent with many of the principles outlined in this report". D-l21 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 5. VISION 2020 -A Plan for the Mississauqa Waterfront CONTD. The Commission also recommends that a Waterfront Partnership Agreement be negotiated which includes: ". developing strategies to maintain or create green corridors up the Credit River and Etobicoke Creek, and to enhance other existing or potential wildlife and fisheries habitats along the shore; . designating preferred and interim routes for the Waterfront Trail, including a requirement that both Ontario Hydro and the provincial agency responsible for water and sewer facilities negotiate pUblic walkways and bicycle paths across their properties; . transferring the Canadian Arsenals property from Canada Post Corporation to an appropriate conservation agency, by means of a land exchange, so it can be managed as part of the Marie Curtis Park." The Royal Commission recognized the dependence on lakefilling to implement many of the waterfront plans in the Greater Toronto Area. Accordingly, the following recommendations have been made: ". the Province should bring forward comprehensive lakefill policies for public review as soon as possible. The policies should require thorough environmental appraisal of all individual lakefill p~ojects, and of their cumulative effects, across the Greater Toronto Waterfront. Until such policies are in place, there should be a moratorium on new lakefillingi . open - water disposal guidelines should be adopted for current lakefill projects." The Authority, in implementing the 1967 Metropolitan Waterfront Plan, recognized Marie Curtis Park as a major regional waterfront park. Components of this plan included: . acquisition of the Canadian Arsenals property (Canada Post) . small craft harbour created through lakefilling immediately west of the Etobicoke Creek mouth . pathway linkages to the Mississauga Waterfront through the Lakeview Pollution Control Plant 0-122 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #S/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 5. VISION 2020 -A Plan for the Misnissauqa Waterfront CONTD. It should be noted that the 1980 Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program did not incorporate the "small craft harbour" component for Marie Curtis. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto is currently initiating the preparation of a "new waterfront plan", as the basis for the Metropolitan Official Plan policies, an implementation program and future projects of the Authority. RATIONALE The Draft Vision 2020 - Mississauga Waterfront does reinforce the 1967 Metropolitan Waterfront Plan, the Authority's Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program, and the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront - Interim Report. Staff can support: . improvements to Marie Curtis Park to create a regional waterfront park or activity centre . acquisition of the Canada Post property and integration with the management of Marie Curtis Park . deferral of the small craft harbour until completion of the new Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront Plan and the establishment of new provincial lakefill policies . inclusion of the lakefill elements as part of the review of lakefilling within the Greater Toronto Waterfront, as recommended in the Watershed Report - Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto's Waterfront. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Authority staff will work with Mississauga to ensure the implementation document reflects the jurisdictional relationship between the City of Mississauga, Metropolitan 'roronto and the MTRCA for the Marie Curtis Park area. The development of the Marie Curtis area as an Activity Centre in accordance with the Interim Report of the Royal Commission on the Future of Toronto's Waterfront, The Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront Plan, and the MTRCA's Greenspace strategy, including the preparation of the 1992-1996 Lake Ontario Waterfront Project. In addition, any proposal for a small craft harbour at Marie Curtis Park by this Authority would require a full environmental assessment study, public participation and approval of the project by the Minister of the Environment. D-123 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTlIORITY CONSIDERATION 6. WATERSHED IMPACT STUDY -Fill. Runoff and Scdimentation KEY ISSUE MTRCA staff has prepared a proposal for a Comprehensive Watershed Impact Study of Fill, Runoff, and Sedimentation. Res. #92 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: ; Ila Bossons THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO TilE AUTHORITY THAT the Guidelines for a Comprehensive Watershed Impact Study, Appendix WR.459, be approved; THAT the estimated cost of $145,000 for carrying out the Watershed Impact Study be included within the Authority's 1991 preliminary budget; AND FURTHER THAT staff investigate alternative sources of funding to carry out the Comprehensive Watershed Impact Study. CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Authority Meeting 16/90, Resolution #192 was passed which stated: "THAT staff develop guidelines for a Comprehensive Watershed Impact Study of Fill, Runoff and Sedimentation by major River. These guidelines will review current information available, and indicate testing and audit methods required. The funding required to undertake development of these guidelines is to be included in the Authority'S 1991 current budget estimates." Staff has prepared the attached "Guidelines for a Comprehensive Watershed Impact Study". The first part of the Guidelines reviews existing information available for the Toronto area, and highlights particular areas in need of further investigation. Part two describes the details of the proposed Watershed Impact Study, including study objectives, study area, and framework for investigation. 0-124 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 7. ROYAL COMMISSION ON THE FUTURE OF THE TORONTO WATERFRONT -"Watershed" KEY ISSUE Timing of Authority comments on the second interim report of the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront. Res. #93 Moved by: ; Marie Labatte Seconded by: Maja Prentice THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the staff be directed to prepare a review of the report entitled "Watershed", by the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront, for consideration by the Authority on January 18, 1991- CARRIED BACKGROUND The second interim report of the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront was released in September 1990. The report, entitled "Watershed", is an impressive document which contains broad commentary on the approaches to development in the Greater Metro Area and specific recommendations for the Waterfront. The report touches many areas of concern to the Authority. It urges more action in many areas of existing Authority programs on the waterfront, in the watersheds, and on the Oak Ridges Moraine. The report overlaps with other provincial initiatives; Options for a Greater Toronto Area Greenlands Strategy 1990, Greater Toronto Area Urban Structures Concept Study, and the Metro Toronto Remedial Action Plan. The Authority needs to review all of these reports and propose a detailed work program which will help to implement as many of the important objectives as possible. 8. STOUFFVILLE RESERVOIK -Chanqe in Operational Procedures KEY ISSUE Staff are proposing to change the operational procedures at the Stouffville Reservoir by not drawing the lake level down for winter flood storage. This will result in the reservoir being left at its summer level to allow for a review of fisheries within the lake by Authority staff. Res. #94 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Maja Prentice THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to change the current operational procedures for the Stouffville Reservoir, to maintain the reservoir at summer level throughout the winter of 1990/91; AND FURTHER THAT the Town of Whitchurch-stouffville be so advised. CARRIED D-125 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 8. STOUFYVILLE RESERVOIR -Chanqe in Operational Procedures CONTD. BACKGROUND The stouffville Dam and Reservoir is located on the West Branch of the Duffin Creek in the north end of the Village of Stouffville. The Authority operates and maintains the dam; and the associated reservoir lands are under a management agreemE!nt with the Town of Whitchurch-stouffville. since the construction of the Stouffville Dam and Reservoir in 1969, the operational procedures have included a complete draw down of the reservoir in late fall to provide for the storage of spring snow-melt. The summer level is reinstated as soon as the spring runoff threat is over. The dam and the operation procedures adopted in 1969, provided significant flood control benefit to downtown Stouffville. In 1979, a channel was constructed which was able to convey the majority of the flows through the downtown sector. Until the early 1980's, the dam, reservoir and associated levels were located outside the built up area of the village; however, since then the village has expanded north and subdivisions now surround the reservoir lands. About this time, the Town and Authority began to receive complaints about the operating procedures. The complaints for the most part dealt with the unsightly appearance of the mud flats during the winter draw down period. In addition, they felt the operations were harming the bass fisheries which had developed and it was felt that the fisheries could be enhanced if the operations were revised. As a result the Authority, in 1988, retained MIE Ltd., an engineering consulting firm to carry out a maintenance investigation and operational review. The study concluded that since the channel now conveyed the majority of the flows, that the storage gained by draining the reservoir was insignificant. Therefore, the operations could be changed with only minor loss in the flood control benefits of the reservoir. Now staff are proposing to undertake a review of fisheries within the reservoir. In order to accommodate this review, the reservoir must be left full during the winter months to allow access for testing. These potential changes in the operations of the reservoir have been explained and are supported by staff at the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville. RATIONALE The information gained during this winter review of fisheries within the Stouffville Reservoir will be used in determining the optimum storage level for promotion of fisheries. Once this level has been defined, a more permanent change to reservoir operations can be incorporated into a major maintenance program, to optimize both flood control and fisheries within the reservoir. 0-126 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 9. BENJAMIN BOAKE TRAIL -Retaining Wall at rear of Nos. 145 to 157, city of North York KEY ISSUE The Authority has received a request from Metropolitan Toronto Councillor Maria Augimeri that the above-noted properties be added to the list of the recently adopted report, Project for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. Res. #95 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Maja Prentice THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff undertake a review of the request from Councillor Maria Augimeri, that the properties known as Nos. 145 to 157, Benjamin Boake Trail, City of North York, be added to the Project for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto; AND FURTHER THAT the Authority staff undertake a review of all pertinent information and discuss the matter with the appropriate Metropolitan Toronto officials and the City of North York Officials, and that Councillor Maria Augimeri be advised. CARRIED BACKGROUND Letter dated November 5, 1990 from Metropolitan Toronto Councillor Maria Augimeri, wherein she requests that the Benjamin Boake site be included in the current pool of priorities as outlined in the Project for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization. The subject properties, known as 145 to 157 Benjamin Boake Trail,formed part of a large overall plan of residential subdivision known as Northwood Park Estates in the City of North York. The Council of the City of North York, at its meeting held on November 14, 1990, adopted Report No. 20 of the North York Works Committee, dated October 20, 1990. This report dealt with the matter of the status of the retaining wall at the rear of the residential homes between Number 145 to 159 inclusive on Benjamin Boake Trail. Council adopted the following Works Committee recommendations: - (a) that City of North York Staff, headed by the Building Commissioner, and including the Commissioner of Public Works and city solicitor be directed to meet with the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto; particularly the Legal Department and the Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department acting on behalf of the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, to develop, and co-ordinate a plan to make the necessary improvements to the retaining wall at the rear of 145, 147, 149, 153, 155, 157 and 159 Benjamin Boake Trail, and report back to the Committee as soon as possible; 0-127 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTIIORITY CONSIDERATION 9. BENJAMIN BOAKE TRAIL -Retaining Wall at rear of Nos. 145 to 157, city of North York CONTD. (b) that the Council of the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be requested to providc sufficient funding to make the necessary improvements to the retaining wall referred to above; (c) that the appropriate Officials be directed to do all things necessary to give effect thercto. 10. MEETING SCHEDULE 1991-92 Water & Related Land Manaqement Advisory Board KEY ISSUE Rescheduling of April 26, 1991 meeting of the Water & Related Land Management Advisory Board, to eliminate conflict with meeting of Metro Toronto council scheduled for the same day. Res. 196 Moved by: Lois Hancey Seconded by: Lois Griffin THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the April 26, 1991 meeting of the Water , Related Land Management Advisory Board be rescheduled to Friday, April 12, 1991 at 10:00 a.m., to eliminate the conflict with the meeting of the Metro Toronto Council scheduled for April 26, 1991. CARRIED 0-128 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #S/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTJlORITY CONSIDERATION 11. ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK Auqust 1990 - StatuB ReDort KEY ISSUE A status report on the approval of the "Project For The Etobicoke Motel strip Waterfront Park". Res. #97 Moved by: ; Lois Griffin Seconded by: Joyce Trimmer THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO TJIE AUTHORITY THAT the status report on the "Project for the Etobicoke Motel strip Waterfront Park", dated 1990-11-21, contained herein, be received for information. CARRIED BACKGROUND At meeting #6/90 on September 7, 1990, the Authority adopted the following resolution: Res. #186 "THAT the Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park, involving total estimated expenditures of $40,000,000, the funds for which are to be raised by ~pecial levy on the Motel Strip development area be adopted; "AND FURTHER THAT the following action be taken: "a) The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be designated the benefiting municipality and be requested to approve the Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park, and to take the necessary steps to ensure that funds will be derived from the Motel Strip redevelopment area to pay for the acquisition and development of the park as set out in the Project (OPA C-65-86); lib) The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be asked to advise the Authority if Metropolitan Toronto plans to use Section 26(6) of the Conservation Authorities Act to secure the funding from the City of Etobicoke; "c) The Province of Ontario be requested to approve the Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park including the provision of $7,000,000 of initial funding, to establish the basic components of the park area, such funding to be repaid to the Province from the funds derived from the Motel Strip redevelopment area; lid) Pursuant to Section 24 of the Conservation Authorities Act; approval of the Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park by the Ontario Muni~ipal Board by requested; lie) The appropriate officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action is required in connection with the project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park, including the execution of any documents. II D-129 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 11. ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK Auqust 1990 - Status Report CONTD. On October 2, 1990, W. A. McLean forwarded requests to the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and Ministry of Natural Resources for approval of the "Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park". The "Project" approval request was considered by the Metropolitan Waterfront Committee on October 19, 1990. In addition, the Committee had the following resolution by the Etobicoke Waterfront Committee from its meeting on October 17, 1990: "Whereas the Ontario'Municipal Board Hearing with respect to the City of Etobicoke Motel Strip Secondary Plan has been deferred; and "Whereas the City of Etobicoke has requested the Province of Ontario to clarify its interest in the area; and "Whereas it is not clear whether an Environmental Assessment will be required by the Province to implement the Mctropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park; and "Whereas for thcse reasons it is deemed to be premature to take a position on the MTRCA project; "Now therefore be it resolved that consideration of the Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park be deferred pending clarification of these issues." The Committee deferred consideration of the Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park pending clarification of the issues cited in the aforementioned resolution by the Etobicoke Waterfront Committee, viz: Ontario Municipal Board Hearing respecting the Motel Strip Secondary Plan, clarification of the provincial interest in the area, and requirement for an Environmental Assessment respecting the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park; and further directed that the Commissioner of Parks and Property, in consultation with the Commissioner of Transportation, the Commissioner of Planning, and the Chief Gencral Manager of the Toronto Transit Commission, be requested to report back to the Committee on the MTRCA proposal, with particular reference to the transit components for access to the proposed parks system. At a subsequent Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront Committee meeting on November 16, 1990, a report was considered which stated that: "the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Project Proposal provides a concrete option for implementing the Public Amenity Area proposed in Etobicoke Official Plan Amendment C-65-86. This should be debated within the context of the Waterfront Partnership Agreement, given clarity with respect to process and the interests of the respective Parties." 0-130 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 11. ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK Auqust 1990 - status Report CONTD. The Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront Committee at this meeting adopted the following recommendation on "partnership agreements": "THAT authority be granted to negotiate a Waterfront Partnership Agreement, in cooperation with the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront, between the City of Etobicoke, Metropolitan Toronto and the Province of Ontario ~especting the Lakeshore Area of Etobicoke" This recommendation will be considered by the Economic Development and Planning committee on December 3, 1990 and Council on December 19, 1990. WORK TO BE DONE The Ministry of Natural Resources is proceeding to review the "Project" in accordance with section 24 of the Conservation Authorities Act, and in conjunction with the preparation of the provincial interest statement on Etobicoke Official Plan Amendment C-65-86. We understand that a meeting has been arranged between the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront, the Province of Ontario, the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the City of Etobicoke to pursue the issue of a "partnership agreement" for the Etobicoke Sector of the Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront. Authority staff have written a letter to all waterfront Planning commissioners in our area of jurisdiction indicating that we support the concept of "partnership agreements", especially since the Authority already has a form of "partnership agreement" with Metropolitan Toronto for the waterfront. Staff also reminded the Planning Commissioners of the Authority's legislated and mandated roles for the waterfront and that these Authority waterfront roles should be recognized in any discussions on "partnership agreements." Authority staff will continue to work with the Province of Ontario, Metropolitan Toronto and the City of Etobicoke in the processing for approval of the Motel strip Project. D-131 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION 12. TOMMY THOMPSON PARK -1991 Interim Manaqement Proqram KEY ISSUE As part of the ongoing interim management of Tommy Thompson Park, staff has prepared the proposed 1991 Interim Management Program for the site. Res. #98 Moved by: Marie Labatte Seconded by: Maja Prentice THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THAT the staff report on the Interim Management Program 'at Tommy Thompson Park, Appendix WR.468, be received; THAT staff be directed to negotiate a licence agreement with the Aquatic Park sailing Club; THAT staff be directed to negotiate a formal agreement with the Toronto Harbour Commissioners regarding access and other such items deemed necessary for the 1991 program; AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to take whatever action is required in connection with the Interim Management Program including the execution of any documents and agreements. CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board Meeting #4/90, the following resolution was adopted: "IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the staff report on the 1990 Interim Management Program at Tommy Thompson Park be received for information". staff has prepared the 1991 Interim Management Program for Tommy Thompson Park for approval. within the Program the following basic components were identified that will be maintained, where possible: . year round access of the park to the public; . a nature interpretive program offered through the summer season; . a transportation service for use by the public during the spring, summer and fall seasons; . a wildlife management program (gull control and tern management); and . a licence agreement with the Aquatic Park Sailing Club for sailing activities. Appendix WR.468 summarizes the proposed 1991 Interim Management Program. Staff will keep all interim users informed of any changes in the 1991 Interim Management Program through the Tommy Thompson Park Newsletter and the information board located at the park. 0-132 W~TER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION 12. TOMMY THOMPSON PARK -1991 Interim Manaqement Proqram CONTD. The following is a brief summary of the major items covered in Appendix WR.468: 1. PUblic Hours: Open year round, weekends and holidays (excluding Christmas and Boxing Day) from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 2. Intercretive: Hikes and theme tours to commence June 1 and be conducted until Labour Day (September 2). Authority staff on dllty every weekend to assist the public. 3. Transcortation Service: Public transportation will be provided commencing April 27, 1991 and will operate until October 14, 1991. The following are the proposed types and times of service: April 27 - May 26 MUlti-seating Passenger Vehicles June 1 - September 2 T.T.C. Special Summer Bus September 7 - October 14 Multi-seating Passenger Vehicles. 4. Lessees: Vehicle parking on site and access during public hours for the Aquatic Park Sailing Club be limited to three (3) weekends in the spring and three (3) weekends in the fall for necessary preparatory work. During public hours outside the above, the Aquatic Park Sailing club members must park their vehicles at the Leslie Street parking area. During non-public hours, access to leased land will be granted upon proof of membership and key privileges. 5. Public Information: An information newsletter be continued highlighting upcoming events and tours and updating users of any special activities. 6. Gull Control Proqram: The program to commence March 25, 1991 and finish July 5, 1991. The areas proposed to be controlled using falconry discouragement methods are the endikement, the area south of the road, and Peninsula D. Raptors will be flown in all areas during the weekdays. Weekend work will be restricted to the endikement and the area south of the road. Upon approval by the Ministry of Natural Resources the program will be tendered as a two (2) year contract. RAT I ONALB The rationale for the Interim Management Program at Tommy Thompson Park is to maintain the existing level of public use of the site until such a time as the Tommy Thompson Park master plan is fully approved and implemented. 0-133 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #5/90 HELD NOVEMBER 23. 1990 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:45 p.m., November 23, 1990. Qon Jackson ; W.A. McLean Chairman Secretary-Treasurer G C\.. , 0-134 the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes WATER AND RELATED LAND ll-JANUARY-1991 #6/90 MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD The Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board met in Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitors Centre on. Friday, January 11, 1991. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:15 a.m. PRESENT Chairman ; Don Jackson Members Lois Hancey Roger Hollander Ron Moran Maja Prentice Joyce Trimmer Chairman of the Authority John McGinnis ABSENT Vice-Chairman Lois Griffin Members: Ila Bossons Brian Harrison Marie Labatte MINUTES Res. #99 Moved by: Ron Moran Seconded by: Lois Hancey THAT the Minutes of Meeting #5/90 be approved. CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Mark wilson. Brinq Back the Don Task Force. dated December 17. 1990. Res. #100 Moved by: Lois Hancey Seconded by: Joyce Trimmer THAT the letter from Mark Wilson, Bring Back the Don Task Force, dated December 17, 1990, asking for MTRCA participation in a study of the Lower Don River valley that the Task Force is undertaking on behalf of Toronto City Council, be received. The Executive Co~ittee has referred the communication to staff for cons ide. :ion and report to the Water , Related Land Management Advisory Board. CARRIED D-135 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #6/90. HELD JANUARY 11. 1991 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. CLEAN WATER ACTION COMMITTEE PRESENTATION Mr. Alan Gordon, Chairman of the Clean Water Action Committee, Ontario Sewer & Watermain Contractors Association (OSWCA) made a presentation to the Advisory Board members on the OSWCA's studies and initiatives to ensure that the province's sewer and watermain infrastructure is rehabilitated and maintained, and sought MTRCA support in principle for the work. ; Res. #101 Moved by: Lois Hancey Seconded by: Joyce Trimmer THAT Mr. Gordon be thanked for an excellent presentation; THAT THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the MTRCA endorse the principles of the Clean Water Action Committee (fUll cost pricing; charge by volume; and reserve revenues for operating and maintaining the water and sewage system); AND FURTHER THAT the following orqanizations be urged to invite the Clean Water Action Committee to make a presentation on their water rates study: regional and local municipalities within the MTRCA's jurisdiction; the Metro Toronto Works committee; and the Association of Conservation Authorities. CARRIED 2. CLEAN UP RURAL BEACHES REPORT KEY ISSUE The Clean Up Rural Beaches (CURB) Plan staff report to improve water quality in the Centreville Creek, East Humber River, and the Bruce Creek (Rouge River headwater) watersheds. Res. #102 Moved by: Maja Prentice Seconded by: Joyce Trimmer THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Clean Up Rural Beaches (CURB) Report, dated December 1990, be approved; AND FURTHER THAT the approved CURB Report be forwarded to the Ministry of the Environment in accordance with the requirements of the Rural Beaches Program. CARRIED D-136 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #6/90. HELD JANUARY 11. 1991 SECTION"I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. CLEAN UP RURAL BEACHES REPORT CaNTO. BACKGROUND In the early 1980's, poor water quality forced closures of conservation area swimming beaches at Albion Hills (Centreville Creek), Boyd (East Humber River), and Bruce's Mill (Bruce Creek). In September 1986, the MTRCA Rural Beaches Project was established in cooperation with the Ministry of the Environment (MOB). The goals of the project were to identify and remedy bacterial pollution sources to improve rural water quality and reduce beach closures. The three year research project (September 1986 - August 1989) has been funded by the Provincial Rural Beaches Program of the MaE. The beginning of the implementation phase (September 1989 - January 1991), has been cost shared equally between the MTRCA and the MOE. Funding to date for the Rural Beaches Project: Research phase: September 1986 - August 1989 $320,550 Implementation phase: September 1989 - January 1991 $ 57,055. During the three year research phase from September 1986 to August 1989, the project: -Inventoried over 100 livestock operations -Monitored water quality throughout the study watersheds -Conducted information extension and public education -Improved manure management facilities on the Authority-owned Albion Hills demonstration farm, by implementing remedial measures. The implementation phase of the Rural Beaches Project began in September 1989. The primary task had been the completion of the Clean Up Rural Beaches (CURB) Report. Clean Un Rural Beaches ( CURB ) proiect The CURB project components include: l. A model that identifies the bacterial pollution sources and their impact on the swimming beaches. 2. An estimated total cost for remedial measures required to improve surface water quality. 3. A strategy to implement remedial measures. Identified Bacterial Pollution Sources: The CURB project identified the following significant contributors of bacterial pollution leading to conservation area beach closures: l. contaminated runoff from inadequate livestock manure storages and barnyards (30 farms). 2. Uncontrolled livestock access to watercourses (31 farms). 3. Bacteria from wildlife living in, or near, watercourses. 4. Failed rural septic systems-(38), and failed septic systems or illegal connections to storm sewers in the communities of Caledon East, Nobleton, King City and Oak Ridges (142) . --- ---- - 0-137 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #6/90. HELD JANUARY 11. 1991 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. CLEAN UP RURAL BEACHES REPORT CONTD. The primary CURB recommendations are: l. That the MaE provide funding for the MTRCA to implement the CURB Plan. 2. That the MaE develop an adequate program of financial assistance to encourage land managers to produce and implement land management plans to improve water quality. 3. That unrestricted livestock access to watercourses no longer be considered normal farming practice. Implement policy changes at the provincial or municipal level to restrict livestock access from municipal drains and flowing watercourses. 4. That contaminated runoff from manure storage facilities and barnyards be contained and safely utilized by field application. 5. That the MOE develop a program to ensure proper function of all rural septic systems adjacent to open water, agricultural field drainage tiles, municipal drains, and storm sewers. Estimated cost of CURB's recommended remedial measures: Watershed Number of sites Estimated Capital Construction Cost Bruce Creek Livestock access 4 $ 16,000 Barnyards and storages 2 74,000 septic system failures 3 30,000 ----- --------- Watershed projects 9 $120,000 Centreville Creek Livestock access 7 $ 19,000 Barnyards and storages 9 512,000 Milkhouse washwater 1 5,000 Septic system failures 5 50,000 ----- --------- Watershed projects 22 $586,000 East Humber River Livestock access 20 $115,000 Barnyards and storages 19 1,407,000 Milkhouse washwater 3 15,000 Septic system failures 114 1,140,000 ------ --------- Watershed projects 156 $2,677,000 ------ ---------- Total project number and cost 187 $3,383.,000 WORK TO BE DONE The CURB Report will be submitted to the MOE's Provincial Rural Beaches Advisory Committee. The CURB Report will be distributed to the Authority's Rural Beaches Project Steering Committee members at the MaE, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Agriculture and Food, York, and Peel Federation of Agriculture. Municipalities within the three study watersheds will also receive copies of the CURB Report. D-138 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #6/90. HELD JANUARY 11. 1991 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 3. CLEAN UP RURAL BEACHES -pilot Implementation Proqram KEY ISSUE To establish the MTRCA's Clean Up Rural Beaches (CURB) Implementation Program to improve water quality in the Centreville Creek, and the Bruce Creek (Rouge River headwater) watersheds. Res. #103 Moved by: Roger Hollander Seconded by: Lois Hancey , THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Minister of the Environment be requested to fund a pilot CURB Implementation Program on the Centreville creek, and the Bruce Creek watersheds; AND FURTHER THAT the Authority enter into an agreement with the Ministry of the Environment to undertake the pilot CURB Implementation Program. AMENDMENT Moved by: Roger Hollander Res. #104 Seconded by: Joyce Trimmer THAT staff be directed to include in the report an additional recommendation, whereby through discussions with the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of AgriCUlture and Food, other mechanisms for aChieving water quality improvements in connection with new or rebuilt farm operations, be explored. THE AMENDMENT WAS................................................ CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS.................................CARRIED BACKGROUND Developed from the CURB Report, the CURB Implementation Program will be directed at the Centreville Creek, and the Bruce Creek watersheds. The aim of the Program is to demonstrate and test on a pilot project basis the recommendations made in the CURB Report by: 1. Providing financial assistance for the construction of remedial measures to improve rural water quality. 2. Encouraging landowners to implement remedial measures and adopt best management practices that reduce pollution loads into local watercourses. These remedial measures include: Restricting livestock from access to watercourses (11 sj.tes, $35,000); Improving manure storage and handling facilities (11 sites, $586,000) ; Riparian plantings to reduce surface runoff into watercourses, improve streambank stability, reduce stream temperatures, and improve wildlife habitat. (11. 3 km, $340,000). 3. Cooperating with local health offices to determine the water quality impact of suspected faulty septic systems. 4. Monitoring surface water quality to evaluate the effectiveness of remedial measures. 5. Conducting an information and education program to increase public awareness of methods and management practices for aChieving and maintaining improved water quality. D-139 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #6/90. HELD JANUARY 11. 1991 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 3. CLEAN UP RURAL BEACHES -Pilot Implementation Proqram CONTD. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Enter into an agreement with the Ministry of the Environment to fund the pilot three year CURB Implementation Program. The Authority would cooperate with farm operators, OMAF, and MaE, to develop individual farm abatement plans to address on-farm sources of bacterial loading into surface waters. Implement remedial measures that include: fencing livestock out of watercourses, alternate watering devices, streambank stabilization, riparian revegetation, new manure storages and improved management practices. Provide information and education to increase public awareness of methods and management practices for achieving and maintaining improved water quality. Monitor surface water quality to evaluate the effectiveness of remedial measures. Based on the results of the pilot project, recommendations will be made with respect to a comprehensive program of remedial measures across all watersheds. FINANCIAL DETAILS Estimated MaE funding necessary for the CURB Implementation Program: Cost of remedial measures: Bruce Creek Livestock access restriction (4) $ 16,000 Manure management facilities (2) $ 74,000 Riparian plantings (6,300 m, $30/m) $190,000 -------- Total $280,000 Centreville Creek Livestock access restriction (7) $ 19,000 Manure management facilities (9) $512,000 Riparian plantings (5,000 m, $30/m) $150,000 -------- Total $683,000 Program Administration Costs (including salaries, water testing, expenses) Total $572,850 ---------- Total Budget Request $1,535,850 0-140 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #6/90. HELD JANUARY 11. 1991 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 4. ROUGE RIVER AND WATERSHED RESTORATION PROJECT KEY ISSUE Undertake the Rouge River and Watershed Restoration Project in cooperation with Trees for Today and Tomorrow, to rehabilitate natural habitats, provide public education, and undertake project maintenance and monitoring. Res. #105 Moved by: John MCGinnis Seconded b~: Ron Moran THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT an agreement be prepared between The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Trees for Today and Tomorrow, on an annual basis, to carry out projects to rehabilitate terrestrial and aquatic habitats, provide public education, and undertake project maintenance and monitoring in the Rouge River watershed. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Authority is in receipt of the Rouge River and Watershed Restoration Project as prepared by Trees for Today and Tomorrow (Appendix WR.592). The proposal aims to improve the Rouge River watershed by vegetatiQg valleyland, reducing streambank erosion and sedimentation and providing public information and education. The work, when completed, will result in improved water quality, rehabilitated fish and wildlife habitat, and enhanced recreational opportunities. Trees for Today and Tomorrow is a program of the Institute of Marine and Terrestrial Ecology, a registered charitable organization. The program is directed by Mr. Aird Lewis who has had a long career in resource management affairs. The Authority is currently working with Trees for Today and Tomorrow, to undertake other revegetation and fish and.wildlife habitat enhancement projects in the Humber River watershed. The Rouge River proposal has been modelled after the Humber River project which has been very successful to date. The Rouge River proposal also complements the implementation actions set out in the Comprehensive Basin Management strategy for the Rouge River Watershed. Because of the Authority's long history in resource management projects, Trees for Today and Tomorrow has requested MTRCA to participate by implementing the work. Staff has reviewed the Rouge River and Watershed Restoration Project and is satisfied it is well conceived and supports the goals of the Authority. 0-141 WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #6/90. HELD JANUARY 11. 1991 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 4. ROUGE RIVER AND WATERSHED RESTORATION PROJECT CONTD. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE If approved, an agreement will be prepared between MTRCA and Trees for Today and Tomorrow. Authority involvement would be on an annual basis. Funds would be transferred to the Authority and MTRCA staff would coordinate project delivery, including administration, hiring, safety training and work implementation. Project identification will be coordinated with the Rouge River Parks Planning Committee and the Rouge River Implementation Committee. FINANCIAL DETAILS The Rouge River and Watershed Restoration Project was submitted to Environment Canada for funding consideration under the Environmental Partners Fund. A three year budget of $500,000 has been identified. The Environmental Partners Fund has been requested to fund $200,000 of the total budget. Trees for Today and Tomorrow would raise the additional $300,000 from other sources. Should the Environmental Partners Fund approve this proposal, MTRCA has tentatively agreed to contribute $48,000 in 1991 to projects within the Rouge River watershed. MTRCA contributions would be available from the sediment control program subject to Authority budget approval. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:36 a.m., January 11, 1991 Don Jackson W.A. McLean Chairman Secretary-Treasurer G