HomeMy WebLinkAboutExecutive Committee 1993Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
er the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
MARCH 12, 1993
minutes
B1
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #1 /93
The Executive Committee met in the Humber Room of the Authority Head Office, 5 Shoreham Drive,
Downsview, on Friday, March 12, 1993. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at
10:08 a.m.
Res. #E1/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Committee sit as a Hearing Board.
PRESENT FOR HEARING:
Following the roll call, a hearing re:
Brian Harrison
Lois Griffin
CARRIED
Chair William Granger
Vice -Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
Gabriele Di Michele
For permission to place approximately 335 cubic metres of fill in a regulated area and construct
a retaining wall and a single family residence in the flood plain on Part 2, Lot 64, Registered
Plan 2027, (72 Pemberton Road), Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed.
Mr. and Mrs. A. Bellissimo, Mr. and Mrs. L. Cali, Mr. and Mrs. D. Mandarano and
Bruno Bellissimo
Withdrawn by applicant.
A staff presentation was made by John Maletich, Manager, Regulation Administration, and Don Prince,
Manager, Property.
Gabriele Di Michele and Sandro Soscia, P.Eng., Soscia Engineering Ltd., spoke regarding the above
quoted permit application.
Res. #E2/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Hearing Board consider this matter in closed session.
Brian Harrison
Lois Griffin
CARRIED
B2 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993
The Hearing Board rose from closed session.
DECISION OF HEARING BOARD
THAT the application for a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, by Gabriele DiMichele for
permission to place approximately 335 cubic metres of fill in a regulated area and construct a retaining
wall and a single family residence in the flood plain on Part 2, Lot 64, Registered Plan 2027, (72
Pemberton Road), Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed, be refused as it will affect the control
of flooding and increase risk to life and property.
Res. #E3/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Executive Committee Meeting reconvene.
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
CARRIED
PRESENT FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING: Chair William Granger
Vice -Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
Jim Witty
ABSENT FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING: Members
MINUTES
Res. #E4/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #12/92 be approved.
CORRESPONDENCE
Richard O'Brien
Paul Palleschi
Brian Harrison
Lois Griffin
CARRIED
(a) Letter from Alan Tonks, Metropolitan Chairman, dated January 11, 1993, re: Weed Spraying
Practices in Metropolitan Toronto Parks.
(b) Letter from Conroy Dowson, MCIP, OPPI, PLE, Conroy Dowson Planning Consultants Inc.,
dated March 8, 1993, re: Permit Application by Mr. and Mrs. A. Bellissimo, Mr. and Mrs. L.
Cali, Mr. and Mrs. D. Mandarano and Bruno Bellissimo, to place fill on Pt. Lot 10, Con. 9,
Brampton, Humber River Watershed.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B3
CORRESPONDENCE (CONTD.)
Res. #E5/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Brain Harrison
THAT the correspondence for Alan Tonks, Metropolitan Chairman, dated January 11, 1993, and
the correspondence from Conroy Dowson, Conroy Dowson Planning Consultants Inc., dated
March 8, 1993, be received.
CARRIED
(c) Letter from Mark Kolberg, P.Eng, Principal, Atria Engineering Hydraulics Inc.,
dated March 5, 1993, re: Toronto Islands Shoreline Management Study Proposal (item 3.
herewith)
Res. #E6/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT the letter from Mark Kolberg, P.Eng, Principal, Atria Engineering Hydraulics Inc., dated
March 5, 1993, be received.
Res. #E7/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
CARRIED
THAT the letter from Mark Kolberg, P.Eng, Principal, Atria Engineering Hydraulics Inc., dated
March 5, 1993, be referred to staff for follow -up.
CARRIED
B4 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 WATERFRONT COMPONENT AND
LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 - 1994
- Scarborough Sector
-Leta A. MacLean
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property on the Lake Ontario Waterfront, located at 155 Chesterton Shores, City of
Scarborough, under "Land Acquisition Project - 1987 - 1991" - Waterfront Component and "Lake
Ontario Waterfront Regeneration Project 1992 - 1994 ", Scar. tough Sector.
Res. #E8/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.260 acres, more or Tess, be purchased from
Leta A. MacLean, said land being Part of Lots 160 and 161, Plan 275, and Part of Beach in front of
Plan 275, designated as Part 12 on Plan 40R -1390, together with a right -of -way over Block F on
Plan 275 and Block B on Plan 360, City of Scarborough, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
THAT the purchase price be $ 195,000.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #51, Authority Meeting #3, May 2, 1986, and Resolution #100, Authority Meeting
#3/91, May 3, 1991, approving the projects.
Situate on the property is a one storey frame dwelling together with a single detached frame
garage.
Negotiations have been conducted with Victor Huttmann of Re /max Reflection Realty Inc., and
subject to the approval of your Committee, an Agreement has now been reached with respect to
the purchase price.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B5
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 WATERFRONT COMPONENT AND
LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 - 1994 (CONTD.)
- Scarborough Sector
-Leta A. MacLean
A map showing the general location of the property and a plan illustrating the specific location was
available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004 -12 -502 - Waterfront Open Space and it is proposed
the funding be obtained from land sale revenue.
2. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND
CONSERVATION COMPONENT
- Humber River Watershed
- Hodgson Development Corporation
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located west of Islington Avenue, south of Nashville Road in the Kleinburg
area of the City of Vaughan under "Land Acquisition Project - 1987 - 1991" - Flood Plain and
Conservation Component - Humber River Watershed.
Res. #E9/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.446 acres, more or less, be purchased from
Hodgson Development Corporation, said land being an irregular shaped parcel of land being Part of
Lot 24, Concession 8, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, consisting of land situate
west of Islington Avenue, south of Nashville Road in the Kleinburg area of the City of Vaughan;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus legal costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
B6 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1 /93, MARCH 12, 1993
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION
COMPONENT (CONTD.)
- Humber River Watershed
- Hodgson Development Corporation
BACKGROUND
Resolution #51, Authority Meeting #3, May 2, 1986 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner and Don Steadman of Fasken, Campell,
Godfrey, Barristers and Solicitors, representative of the owner.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
A map showing the general location of the property and a plan illustrating the specific location was
available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004 -1 1 -502 - Flood Control Hazard Account.
3. TORONTO ISLANDS
- Shoreline Management Study
KEY ISSUE
To retain the services of consulting engineers to undertake the first phase of the Toronto Islands
Shoreline Management Study.
Res. #E10/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT W.F. Baird and Associates Coastal Engineers
Ltd. be retained to complete the first phase of the Toronto Islands Shoreline Management Study at
a total upset cost limit of $218,000 (excluding the Good and Services Tax).
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B7
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. TORONTO ISLANDS (CONTD.)
- Shoreline Management Study
BACKGROUND
Further to a request of the Ministry of Natural Resources, the members of the Authority at a
meeting held on August 21, 1992, adopted Resolution #126:
"THAT staff be directed to advise the Ministry of Natural Resources that the Authority is
prepared to act as the Ministry's agent in the completion of studies, design and
construction of shoreline management works to protect the existing residential community
on Toronto Islands;
THAT staff be directed to establish a technical coordinating committee with representation
from the Toronto Islands Residents Association, the Ministry of Natural Resources, the
Ministry of Municipal Affairs, the Waterfront Trust, Metropolitan Toronto, other involved
agencies as required, and The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to
assist in the development of terms of reference, and completion of design investigations
and construction;
THAT the Ministry of Natural Resources be requested to advise, as soon as possible, on the
level of funding available in 1992;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to prepare an agreement between the Authority and
the Ministry of Natural Resources which will deal with various issues such as:
a) establish that the Authority will not own the shoreline protection works and will not
be responsible for maintenance of the works;
b) protect the Authority from any liability associated with the design, construction, and
operation of the works;
c) secure the necessary approvals or exemption for the works under the Environmental
Assessment Act;
d) allow for the costs of administrative and technical staff associated with the project
to be recovered from the funding for the project:
e) confirm that the funding for the work will be grants, payable in advance, from the
Province of Ontario in the amount of 100% of the costs incurred by the Authority."
The Toronto Islands Technical Steering Committee held its first meeting on October 30, 1992.
Terms of Reference for an initial study of existing shoreline stability were prepared and fourteen
qualified consulting firms were invited to submit an "Expression of Interest" in the study.
From the five expressions of interest received, the Committee approved the selection of Atria
Engineering Hydraulics Inc., W.F. Baird and Associates and MacLaren Plansearch as the short list of
consultants to be formally invited to submit proposals for the Toronto Islands study.
B8 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993,
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. TORONTO ISLANDS (CONTD.)
- Shoreline Management Study
Written proposals were received on February 8 and each consulting team made a formal
presentation to members of the Committee on February 15th, 1993.
The proposals are summarized as follows:
Consultants Total Cost (excluding GST)
W.F. Baird and Associates $189,657
MacLaren Plansearch $240,795
Atria Engineering Hydraulics $299,014
The Committee met twice to discuss and review the proposals and it was agreed that the proposal
submitted by W.F. Baird and Associates be accepted.
RATIONALE
The proposals were reviewed in detail by the sub - committee represented by Authority and Ministry
of Natural Resources staff.
The W.F. Baird and Associates proposal addressed all the tasks listed in the Terms of Reference
and presented a fully qualified and experienced team of experts. They are particularly strong in the
numerical modelling for coastal processes. It was agreed that their proposal met the Terms of
Reference while providing a comprehensive and appropriate study within an acceptable schedule
and project cost.
To ensure that the Committee would be obtaining the best possible study results, it was
recommended that the Baird proposal be "strengthened ", particularly in the wave hindcast data and
structural assessment. From the review of all proposals, it was recognized that it was important
that the wave hindcast data be the best and most reliable, and that Baird's level of effort may need
to be increased to ensure good study results. The structural assessment was another area of the
proposal that the sub - committee recommended be reviewed with the purpose of increasing the
level of effort for certain components.
The Committee accepted the W.F. Baird and Associates proposal and directed the Authority to
meet with the consultants to negotiate a final agreement which could include additional work as
deemed necessary, up to an additional upset limit of 15% over the proposal cost or $218,000
(excluding GST).
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The key objectives of this study are to:
• develop an understanding of the evolving coastal processes, Iandform evolution, and the
long term stability of the Island Iandform. This will include an historical and
geomorphologic assessment of the erosion /accretion issues along the entire southerly
shoreline.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B9
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. TORONTO ISLANDS (CONTD.)
- Shoreline Management Study
• identify and delineate the flood, erosion and dynamic beach susceptibility of the Algonquin,
Centre and Wards Islands landforms.
• evaluate the structural integrity and functional performance of the existing shoreline
structures on Algonquin, Centre and Wards Islands.
The consultant will develop recommendations for an overall shoreline stabilization program for the
easterly Toronto Islands sector with a priority ranking for remedial works.
Throughout the course of the study, the consultant will attend regular meetings of the Technical
Steering Committee to outline progress and present findings. Two public meetings will be held
with the Toronto Islands residential community.
The findings and recommendations from the study will be used to assist the Technical Steering
Committee to determine the need for additional studies and design of alternative and recommended
remedial works.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The total upset limit for the cost of the study, as approved by the Technical Steering Committee is
$218,000 (not including GST).
Funding will be provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources at a 100% grant rate under Account
No. 151-01.
4. CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO
-Re- appointment of Gordon R. Baker, Q.C.
KEY ISSUE
The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto appoints members for a three year term.
Res. #E11/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the membership of Mr.
Gordon R. Baker, Q.C. be renewed for a further three -year term, October 7, 1991 to
October 7, 1994.
CARRIED
B10 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO (CONTD.)
-Re- appointment of Gordon R. Baker, Q.C.
BACKGROUND
This recommendation was approved by the board of The Conservation Foundation of Greater
Toronto on Tuesday, November 26, 1991. A request was made to staff of the Authority late in
1991 for renewal of Mr. Baker's membership. However, the request was inadvertently omitted
from the Executive Committee agenda. Approval is now being requested to comply with the
guidelines set out in the Foundation's Charter and By -Laws.
5. MASTER CANVAS CRAFT LIMITED
-Lease of Authority Land by The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for approval of The
Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conversation Authority, to renew the existing lease for an
additional one year period.
Res. #E12/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, is the owner of
certain lands in the City of Etobicoke in The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto on the south side
of Albion, east of Eglinton Avenue.
AND WHEREAS the subject lands are under management agreement with The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto for Parks and Recreation purposes and in accordance with the terms of an
Agreement dated June 14, 1961, that the Authority approve of The Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto entering into a lease renewal agreement, commencing the 1st day of October 1992 and
expiring on the 30th day of September, 1993, on the same terms and conditions as set out in the
1991 indenture, except that the arrangement shall now be shown as to be terminated on
September 30, 1993.
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Under Resolution #79, the Members of the Authority authorized the lease of Authority -owned land
at the above location by The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto to Master Canvas Craft Limited
for a two year period, commencing the 1st day of October 1990 and expiring the 30th day of
September 1992.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B 1 1
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. MASTER CANVAS CRAFT LIMITED
-Lease of Authority Land by The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
The subject property was acquired by the Authority on May 12, 1986, under the Flood Plain and
Valley Land Acquisition Project in the Humber River Watershed.
Master Canvas Craft Limited is the adjacent owner and the lands were initially leased by The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto without consulting the Authority through an apparent
oversight.
Extensive discussions were held with the officials of the Parks and Property Department of The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and Master Canvas Craft Limited and the earlier agreement
was arranged which has now terminated as of September 30, 1992.
The property is currently for sale and rather than terminate the existing arrangement which could
possibly cause undue hardship and Toss of jobs, it is felt that the extension as proposed is
reasonable.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
In accordance with the terms and conditions of the existing agreement, no revenue or expenses
will be incurred in this instance by the Authority.
6. THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO
- Request for a permanent easement for a Sanitary Trunk Sewer, south of Lawrence Avenue
East and West of Galloway Road
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto to provide a permanent
easement for a Sanitary Trunk Sewer, in exchange for conveyance of a parcel of flood plain lands
to the Authority, located south of Lawrence Avenue East, West of Galloway Road.
Res. #E13/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from The Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto to provide a permanent easement for a sanitary trunk sewer in exchange for conveyance
of 0.048 hectares (0.110 acres) of flood plain land to the Authority, south of Lawrence Avenue
East, west of Galloway Road;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co- operate
with The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto in this instance;
B12 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO (CONTD.)
- Request for a permanent easement for a Sanitary Trunk Sewer, south of Lawrence Avenue
East and West of Galloway Road
THAT a permanent easements containing 0.336 hectares, more or less, (0.831 acres) be granted
to The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for a Sanitary Trunk Sewer, said land being Part of
Block C, Plan M -746, City of Scarborough, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs,
together with conveyance to the Authority of 0.048 hectares (0.119 acres) of flood plain lands;
THAT said easement be subject to an Order -in- Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Municipality of Metr-- nolitan Toronto has conveyed lands to the Authority over the years for
the nominal considerat' :f $2.00 and has ;uested that this easement be granted for'the
nominal consideration ,2.00. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto has agreed to assume all
legal, survey and other c.:sts involved in completing the transaction.
The subject lands were acquired from The Corporation of the Township of Scarborough in July
1963 under the Highland Creek Flood Plain Lands component of the Land Acquisition Project.
A map showing the general location of the property is attached. A plan illustrating the specific
location will be available at the meeting.
7. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 -1991 FLOOD PLAIN
AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT
-The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, Highland Creek Watershed
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located on the south side of Lawrence Avenue East, in the City of
Scarborough under "Land Acquisition Project 1987-1991" - Flood Plain and Conservation
Component - Highland Creek Watershed.
Res. #E14/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.119 acres, more or less, be purchased from
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, said land being an irregular shaped parcel of land being
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B13.
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
7. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 -1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND
CONSERVATION COMPONENT (CONTD.)
-The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, Highland Creek Watershed
Part of Road Widening, Registered Plan M -746, City of Scarborough, The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto, consisting of land situate on the south side of Lawrence Avenue in the City
of Scarborough;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus conveyance by the Authority to the
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto of a permanent easement;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #51, Authority Meeting #3, May 2, 1986 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with staff of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
A map illustrating the general location of the property is attached. A plan illustrating the specific
location will be available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The funding of this purchase will be charged to Account 004 -1 1 -502 - Flood Control Hazard
Account.
B14 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. INTERIM WASTE AUTHORITY - SHORT LISTS OF SITES
Durham, Peel and York /Metropolitan Toronto
KEY ISSUE
Authority response to the circulation of information related to the selection of three landfill sites,
one in each of Durham, Peel and York.
Res. #E15/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the staff report on the Short Lists of Sites be received;
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT the Interim Waste Authority (IWA) be advised that there are regulated valley and stream
corridors that will be affected by the development of a landfill on the sites identified on the short
lists;
THAT the MTRCA strongly discourages the relocation and /or Toss of valley and stream corridors;
AND FURTHER THAT, the detailed descriptions of the sites within the jurisdiction of the
Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority ( MTRCA) be forwarded to the IWA, the
Ministry of Natural Resources, and to the regional and area municipalities in which they are located.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Interim Waste Authority (IWA) was established by the government in May 1991 to find three
landfill sites, one within each of:
the Region of Durham to service its disposal needs;
the Region of Peel to service its disposal needs; and
the Region of York and Metropolitan Toronto to service their disposal needs.
The IWA established a Government Reviewers' group in August of 1991 and MTRCA staff were
invited to participate. Input was provided to the IWA in the form of MTRCA mapping of
Environmentally Significant Areas; land ownership; areas identified as suitable for acquisition; and
areas scheduled under Ontario Regulation 158. Staff has provided comment with respect to the
ranking and weighting of site selection criteria (October 1991) and the revised approach and
criteria (June 1992).
In June 1992, the IWA announced its three Long Lists of Candidate Sites and, in considering a
staff report in this connection the MTRCA adopted the following resolution:
"THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report on the Interim Waste
Authority's Long List of Candidate Sites in Durham, Peel and York /Metropolitan Toronto, be
received;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B15
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. INTERIM WASTE AUTHORITY - SHORT LISTS OF SITES (CONTD.)
Durham, Peel and York /Metropolitan Toronto
THAT staff be directed to continue to participate in the Government Reviewers' process to
ensure that adopted Authority program, policy and project interests are addressed;
THAT staff notify the Interim Waste Authority of the specific Authority interests affected
on a site by site basis;
THAT the Interim Waste Authority and the Minister of the Environment be advised that the
Authority considers its lands and those lands it has designated as necessary for the
protection of the Greenspace system to be unsuitable for use as a sanitary landfill site, by
their characteristics as floodplain, hazard and valleyland, environmentally significant areas
and conservation lands;
AND FURTHER THAT, although the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program has
yet to be endorsed by the Authority's watershed municipalities and adopted by the
Authority, the principles of valley and stream corridor protection, to ensure the
environmental integrity of watersheds, is integral to the Authority's 1989 Greenspace
Strategy and should be recognized and incorporated into the Interim Waste Authority's site
selection process."
In detailed comments related to the long lists, staff identified the MTRCA concerns specific to each
of the sites, including those sites affected by Ontario Regulation 158 which are in addition to those
covered by registered fill schedules. The draft Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
was also referenced and copies of the proposals and diagrams defining the corridors forwarded to
the IWA.
In November 1992, the three Short Lists were released and comments are required by the end of
March.
IMPACT ON AUTHORITY POLICIES & PROGRAMS
Under the Conservation Authorities Act, the MTRCA has the responsibility of developing policies,
programs and projects "whereby the natural resources of the watershed may be conserved,
restored, developed and managed" (Sec. 21.a). The MTRCA adopted a comprehensive Watershed
Plan in 1980 which was updated in 1986 and, in 1989, supplemented by the Greenspace Strategy.
The MTRCA has also adopted and administers Ontario Regulation 158 requiring private or municipal
proponents to apply for permission to:
. build in an area susceptible to flooding,
. place fill in an area shown on registered schedules, or
. alter a watercourse.
In its input and comment to the IWA, the Authority has identified the following areas of interest:
potential impacts on areas regulated under Ontario Regulation 158;
potential impacts on the landforms and ecological functions of valley and stream corridors;
B16 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. INTERIM WASTE AUTHORITY - SHORT LISTS OF SITES (CONTD.)
Durham, Peel and York /Metropolitan Toronto
potential impacts on water quality, both surface and groundwater, which could impact on
the watersheds within Authority jurisdiction;
potential impacts on areas designated as, or potentially, environmentally significant.
These concerns relate not only to the sites and their zones of impact but also to the
transportation /access routes that may be affected by the selection of a specific site.
Of the sites identified on the three short lists, within MTRCA jurisdiction, all are in headwaters
areas. Research into the functioning of watercourses has shown that the loss of headwaters
tributaries, small watercourses previously considered only locally significant, will, over time, affect
downstream areas in two ways. First, the loss of numerous small natural storage areas and runoff
attenuation in the upstream sections of a watershed can impact the main stem of the watershed
causing it to adjust and deepen and can increase the frequency of flooding and erosion and
decrease water quality. Secondly, the loss of headwaters habitats and natural nutrient sources can
result in a biologically depressed river and estuary ecosystems. These characteristics are exhibited
within the urbanized watersheds within the Greater Toronto Area and considerable time and money
is being expended on rehabilitation.
The IWA, in identifying valley and stream corridors to be protected, appears to have limited their
attention to those sections where the Authority has registered fill schedules. The MTRCA, in
registering new Fill Regulations in 1986, was able to provide coverage for all areas draining in
excess of 1300 ha (5 square miles). This cutoff was as a result of funding rather than technical
considerations and it should never be construed as a lack of Authority interest in or regulation of
the upstream sections of its watersheds. Since 1986, a mapr'r.g extension program has added to
the Authority's data base, based on priorities reflecting devel, lent pressure. In the sections
affected by the short lists, the Authority's regulation applies t:: any proposal to built within the
flood plain and /or to alter any watercourse. When proposals come forward for areas not previously
identified for development, the Authority requires the proponent to carry out flood studies and to
identify and set aside the valley and stream corridors prior to establishing the proposed
development pattern.
Within the Authority's area of jurisdiction, the headwaters of the following watersheds are affected
by the sites being considered:
Humber River - Sites C -34B, C -48, V -3B, V -4A, V -4D
Don River - Sites V -3B, V -4A, V -4D
Petticoat Creek - Sites M -6, T -1
Duffin Creek - Sites T -1, EE -4, EE -10, EE -11.
Studies related to the Seaton Community proposal in the Duffin watershed indicated that
groundwater recharge, through existing aquifer systems, maintains base flow to the creek.
Impacts on the groundwater /aquifers would then impact on the surface flows, both in quantity and
in quality. Similar studies have not been carried out for the Authority's other watersheds. The
relationship between groundwater and surface water is of concern to the Authority and its
watershed municipalities and needs to be addressed.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 817
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. INTERIM WASTE AUTHORITY - SHORT LISTS OF SITES (CONTD.)
Durham, Peel and York /Metropolitan Toronto
The Authority requested funding from the IWA to address its concerns regarding:
how to assess the potential ecological impact resulting from the relocation and or diversion
of headwaters tributaries, on the overall watershed system, and
how to assess the potential for contamination of aquifers which may recharge to a
watershed system.
This request was denied. The Ministry of Natural Resources and the Authority's member
municipalities have been asked to consider these concerns in any studies they carry out with
respect to the IWA proposals.
9. DRAFT REPORT - NEW PLANNING FOR ONTARIO
- December 1992
KEY ISSUE
The preparation and submission of Authority comments on the Draft Report of the Commission on
Planning and Development Reform in Ontario.
Res. #E16/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT the brief to the Commission on Planning and Development Reform in Ontario, March 1993,
be forwarded to the Commission for consideration in the preparation of their final report;
THAT The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority endorse the recommendation •
of the Commission that one of the purposes of municipal planning be to protect and conserve the
natural environment and foster the well -being of ecosystems;
THAT the Authority provide the Commission with information regarding the Don Watershed Task
Force as a model of a process for the development of a watershed strategy;
THAT conservation authorities coordinate the watershed planning process ensuring the involvement
of all interested citizens, municipalities, provincial ministries and agencies;
THAT, in preparing plans, municipalities develop policies based on studies done on a watershed
basis;
THAT the wording of the section(s) of the proposed Provincial Policy Statements dealing with the
natural heritage system, be amended to add reference to the watershed and subwatershed planning
processes as mechanisms whereby these resources can be identified and protected;
B18 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993.
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. DRAFT REPORT - NEW PLANNING FOR ONTARIO (CONTD.)
- December 1992
THAT the Commission delete references to regional and local significance from its
recommendations respecting provincial policies for natural heritage protection in order to ensure a
systems approach;
THAT, should the Province proceed to establish development standards with respect to the form,
features and /or functions of the natural heritage system, conservation authority representation be
included on the Committee responsible for this task;
THAT the Commission give further consideration to the development control mechanisms proposed
and their ability to ensure the protection, enhancement and restoration of the natural heritage
system;
THAT The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority request the Commission to
reiterate its suggestions with respect to amendments to the Conservation Authorities Act as a part
of its final report and that they be stated as recommendations to the Province of Ontario;
THAT the Province of Ontario coordinate the development of a Private Land Stewardship Manual to
encourage good land management practices on private lands and of a private land stewardship
partnership amongst interested ministries and agencies, including conservation authorities, to
facilitate implementation;
THAT The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority discuss with its member
municipalities and the Province of Ontario the financial implications of and opportunities to
accelerate the development of individual watershed strategies.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Commission on Planning and Development Reform in Ontario was appointed by the Minister of
Municipal Affairs on June 12, 1991. The Commission's mandate is to recommend changes to the
Planning Act and to related policy to restore integrity to the planning process; to improve the timing
and efficiency of the review process; and protect the environment.
The Authority and its staff provided input to the Commission in 1992. The Commission has
circulated its Draft Report for comment by March 26, 1993. Their Final Report is scheduled for
completion in May 1993 and implementing legislation is anticipated late in 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B19
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
KEY ISSUE
Appointment of Enforcement Officer to administer Fill and Construction Regulations.
Res. #E17/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT Brian E. Denney be appointed as an Enforcement Offir for the purpose of enforcing
regulations made by The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, pursuant to
Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Conservation Authorities Act provides for an Authority to appoint Enforcement Officers to
enforce its regulations. For the purpose of enforcing the regulations made by The Metropolitan
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, pursuant to Section 28(1) of the Conservation
Authorities Act, it is necessary for the Authority to appoint Brian E. Denney, Director of Water
Resource Division as an Enforcement Officer. This designation is necessary to permit him to
enforce the Fill and Construction Regulations pursuant to Section 28(1) of the Conservation
Authorities Act.
Presently the Manager of Regulation Administration and the Manager of Enforcement Safety and
Security have this appointment. As the Director of Water Resource Division, Mr. Denney should
have the powers to facilitate the enforcement of our regulations as he has the responsibility to
oversee this program.
11.
REPORT #1/93 - TENDER OPENING SUB - COMMITTEE
- #F0D93 -02 One 1993 1 -Ton Stake Truck
- #F0D93 -06 One 1993 GMC Suburban
- #F0D93 -07 One 1993 Van
- #F0D93 -10 Two Outfront Rotary Mowers with Snow Blowers
- #F0D93 -15 One Outfront Rotary Mower
KEY ISSUE
The Tender Opening Sub - Committee opened tenders for the above vehicles and equipment on
March 5, 1993. The tenders received were referred to staff for review and report to the Executive
Committee meeting on March 12, 1993.
Res. #E18/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT Report #1/93 (Appendix TO.1 /93) of the Tender Opening Sub - Committee be received;
B20 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. REPORT #1193 - TENDER OPENING SUB - COMMITTEE (CONTD.)
THAT Tender #F0D93 -10 for two 1993 Outfront Rotary Mowers complete with cabs and
snowblowers, be awarded to Nobleton Farm Service Ltd., in the total sum of $45,448.00, it being
the lowest quotation received and meeting all specifications;
AND FURTHER THAT the following staff report be received, advising that pursuant to the
Purchasing Policy, staff has awarded:
Tender #F0D93 -02 for one 1993 one -ton truck, with trade -in of vehicle #42 to Stoneleigh
Motors Limited, in the total sum of $19,905.51, it being the lowest quotation received,
Tender #F0D93 -06 for one 1993 GMC Suburban with trade -in of vehicle #40 to King City
Motor Products Ltd., in the total sum of $24,233.75, it being the lowest quotation
received,
Tender #F0D93 -07 for one 1993 extended mini -van, with trade -in of vehicle #27 to
Northtown Ford Sales in the total sum of $14,919.35, it being the lowest quotation
received,
Tender #F0D93 -15 for one 1993 Outfront Rotary Mower to Core Rentals Limited in the
total sum of $18,580.55, it being the lowest quotation received and meeting all
specifications.
CARRIED
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Staff is satisfied that the tenders received from the vendors recommended in this report meet our
requirements. Funds for the acquisition of the vehicles are available in the Vehicle Acquisition
Budget, Account No. 701-11-404, and for the equipment, in Account No. 701-11-405.
12. APPEAL TO THE ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD
-Minor Variance Application A23/93, 83 Rossmull Crescent (Justin Properties Inc.), City of
Vaughan
KEY ISSUE
Staff are seeking the concurrence of the Executive Committee to appeal to the Ontario Municipal
Board the decision of Vaughan's Committee of Adjustment on Minor Variance Application A23/93.
An appeal on behalf of the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (MTRCA)
would need to be launched by March 19, 1993 having regard for the 30 day appeal period
effective from the date of hearing.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1193, MARCH 12, 1993 B21
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
12. APPEAL TO THE ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD (CONTD.)
-Minor Variance Application A23/93, 83 Rossmull Crescent (Justin Properties Inc.), City of
Vaughan
Res. #E19/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT the Executive Committee direct staff to launch an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board with
respect to Minor Variance Application A23/93, 83 Rossmull Crescent, (Justin Properties Inc.), City
of Vaughan.
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to consult with the applicant concerning a resolution to the
issue, and report to the Executive Committee if a withdrawal of the appeal can be recommended.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In July of 1988, Authority staff noted an encroachment of an iron fence, swing set and sandbox on
Authority owned land at the rear of 83 Rossmull Crescent, City of Vaughan. A number of other
encroachments were also noted in the same area.
On November 18, 1988 the Executive Committee directed staff to remove these encroachments.
In the case of 83 Rossmull Crescent the encroachment was removed with the exception of fence
posts which the owner requested permission to leave in place pending resolution of his request to
purchase land from the Authority.
At the same time staff were negotiating with the developer of this subdivision to resolve long
outstanding concerns related to slope stability works. On February 7, 1992 the Executive
Committee directed staff to accept $30,000 offered by the developer to address these concerns.
In order for these works to be carried out, all encroachments in the Rossmull Crescent area were
required to be removed. Accordingly, all owners were notified of the proposed works and asked to
remove the encroachments from Authority owned lands.
As part of the slope stability works, the line between Authority lands and the private properties
was staked by an Ontario Land Surveyor. It was at that time the concrete slab, associated with
the swimming pool and the steel fence encroachment, was identified at 83 Rossmull Crescent.
Since completion of the slope stabilization works in 1992, staff have been in the process of
preparing a landscape plan for this area. The planting and regeneration plan has recently been
prepared and staff are in the process of arranging a meeting with residents of the area to discuss
this proposal and other related issues.
On February 3, 1993, staff received Minor Variance Application A23/93 which was for the purpose
of permitting the maintenance of an existing deck and pool, notwithstanding the minimum side yard
setback for the deck is 0.37 metres rather than the required 1.20 metres, and the minimum rear
yard setback for the pool is 1.22 metres rather than the required 1.50 metres.
B22 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
12. APPEAL TO THE ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD (CONTD.)
-Minor Variance Application A23/93, 83 Rossmull Crescent (Justin Properties Inc.), City of
Vaughan
Surrounding the existing pool is a concrete pad and iron fence which encroaches approximately
0.30 metres onto property owned by the MTRCA. Staff responded to the application
recommending it be deferred pending the resolution of the encroachment issue.
The application was considered by the City of Vaughan Committee of Adjustment on February 18,
1993. The Committee directed the applicant's attention to the comments received from the
MTRCA. The applicant responded that he has wanted to buy approximately 80 to 90 feet at the
back of his property from the Authority for approximately 5 or.6 years now, and that he could not
see any major problems with this request as it should be resolved in the near future.
It was the decision of the Committee of Adjustment to approve the application and delete the
condition that the applicant obtain approval from the Authority as they felt this was not required,
thereby having no regard for the encroachment issue.
On March 3, 1993, staff wrote to the applicant requesting a meeting with him in an attempt to
have this encroachment issue resolved through a sale of land, encroachment agreement or removal
of the encroachment. If such an arrangement cannot be achieved then the option to appeal to the
Ontario Municipal Board may be necessary.
Staff have also consulted with our lawyers at Gardiner, Roberts regarding this Minor Variance
Application and it was their opinion that in the interim this matter be referred to the Ontario
Municipal Board. The last date of Appeal is March 19, 1993.
13. APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS
- October, November, December 1992
KEY ISSUE
Request for approval of the accounts for October, November and December 1992.
Res. #E20/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT expenditures for the months of October, November, December of 1992, in the amount of
$23,340,700. be approved.
CARRIED
ANALYSIS
The accounts for the period are higher than usual because of the acquisition of Canada Post at a
cost of almost $15 million.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B23
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. DECISION OF HEARING
KEY ISSUE
The Hearing Board, on the matter of Gabriel Di Michele, for permission to place approximately 335
cubic metres of fill in a regulated area and construct a retaining wall and a single family residence
in the flood plain on Part 2, Lot 64, Registered Plan 2027, (72 Pemberton Road), Town of
Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed, reported to the Executive Committee.
Res. #E21/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT the application for a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, by Gabriele DiMichele for
permission to place approximately 335 cubic metres of fill in a regulated area and construct a
retaining wall and a single family residence in the flood plain on Part 2, Lot 64, Registered Plan
2027, (72 Pemberton Road), Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed, be refused as it will
affect the control of flooding and increase risk to life and property.
15. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Res. #E22/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Lois Griffin
CARRIED
THAT permit application listed below as (n), The Berkeley Street Cooperative, be approved in
accordance with the information contained within the report.
CARRIED
(n) The Berkeley Street Cooperative
To construct a 99 unit non - profit cooperative apartment building, on 54 Parliament Street
(West side of Parliament St., south of Front St. East), in the City of Toronto, Don River
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Berkeley Street Housing Corporation Plan; prepared by Paul Reuber Incorporated; Drawing
No.s A1-A3, A 1 1 and Al2; received February 5, 1993;
(2) Letter of correspondence regarding the structural integrity of the 54 Parliament apartment
building as received on March 9, 1993.
B24 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Res. #E23/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT permit applications listed herein as (a) to (q) inclusive, with the exception of (n), be
approved, in accordance to the information contained within the reports.
CARRIED
(a) Hindu Sabha Temple
To alter a watercourse, on Lot 7, Concession 10 N.D.S., (Gore Road),
in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Hindu Sabha Temple - Landscaping Site Plan and Details; Drawing No. Al; February 10,
1983; Site Plan - Plumbing Mechanical; Drawing No. M -1; received November 24, 1992;
Site Plan - Plumbing Mechanical; Drawing M -1; received November 23, 1992;
(2) Storm Water Management Report; prepared by Land -Pro Engineering Consultants Inc.;
dated September 30, 1992.
(b) S.G.F. Developments Limited
To alter a watercourse, on Part Lots 22 & 23, Concession 4, Draft Plan 19T- 89016,
Block D, (McNaughton Road & Keele Street), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Storm Drainage Plans; prepared by Mitchell, Pound & Braddock; Project 90116; Drawing G-
2, Revision 4, dated February 10, 1993; Drawing P -3, Revision 4, dated October 19, 1992;
Drawing P -4, Revision 6, dated September 11, 1992; Drawing P -5, Revision 7, dated
September 11, 1992; and Drawing P -7, Revision 3, dated May 9, 1992.
(c) Laurentian Bank of Canada
To place fill within a regulated area, on Part Lots 1 & 2, Registered Plan 65M -1 114,
(75 Pine Ridge Ave.), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Report, prepared by Terraprobe Limited; dated September 11, 1992;
(2) Site Plan and Retaining Wall Design; prepared by Jagger Films Limited; dated September
1992; Project 92396.00; received September 11, 1992;
(3) Letter by Sheldon B. Switzer & Associates Ltd.; dated January 27, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B25
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(d) Franca Giuliani
To construct within the flood plain, on Part Lot 19, Concession 8, (9770 Highway #27),
in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Kleinburg Motel Proposed Storage Building Site Plan; Drawing No. 1, No. 2; Sheet 1, dated
January 25, 1993;
(2) Proposed Storage Building Foundation Details; Drawing No. S1; received February 19,
1993.
(e) Mr. Robert Fitzhenry
To construct within the flood plain, on Lot 9, Concession 1 EYS, (83 Plymbridge Road), in
the City of North York, Don River Watershed.
' In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Survey; prepared by Unwin, Murphy & Esten Ltd.; dated December 6, 1992;
(2) Site Plan; prepared by Brian Williams; Drawings A -1 to A -6, A -8 & A -9.
(f) The City of York - Property, Parking & Economic Development Dept.
To construct within the flood plain, on Part Lot 37, Concession 3, (East side Rockcliffe
Blvd., north of Terry Drive), in the City of York, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by the City of York; Drawing No. PAV.528 -3; dated October, 1992, and
received January 27, 1993.
(g) The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
To regrade the existing property to allow for future expansion of the Highland Creek
Treatment Plant, on 51 Beechgrove Drive, in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Grading and Cross - Sectional Plans; Sheet Nos. 1 -5; Drawing Nos. 1020 -D -14837 to 1020 -
D- 14841; Contract WPC; prepared by Proctor and Redfern; revised as received on
February 25, 1993;
(2) Transplanting Plan for the Highland Creek Treatment Plant; Drawing No. 1020 -D- 14837;
Consultants Reference B1- 83159 -L1; prepared by Proctor & Redfern; revised as received on
February 25, 1993;
(3) Sediment Control Details; Drawing No.A4- 83159 -D1 and A4- 83159 -D2; prepared by
Proctor and Redfern; as received on February 25, 1993.
B26 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(h) Tudor and Elizabeth Dabuleanu
To construct a pedestrian bridge, on Part Lot 2, Concession 2, (7175 Bayview Avenue,
[ Bayview Avenue north of Steeles]), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Suspension Bridge Layout Plan; prepared by John Edmiston; revised as received on
February 25, 1993;
(2) Suspension Bridge Concrete Anchor Details; prepared by John Edmiston; revised as
received on February 25, 1993.
(i) Captain Developments /Jolis Investments
To place fill in a regulated area and constructing within the flood plain, on Part Lot 17,
Concession 3, (north of 16th Avenue, West of Woodbine Avenue), in the Town of
Markham,
Rouge River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Temporary Construction Cross, Prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman; Project No.
88577; Drawing No. 207; dated June, 1992, received February 2, 1993.
(i) The Estate of Mrs. Vidvaben H. Patel
To construct an addition to the existing residence and a garden shed in the flood plain, on
Part Lot 17, Registered Plan 6037, (23 Glenbourne Park Drive), in the Town of Markham,
Rouge River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by E.W. Bowyer Inc., Ontario Land Surveyor; File No. 91 -144; Drawing
M -160, dated revised December 18, 1992; received January 22, 1993;
(2) Structural Design Letter; prepared by AMR Engineering Ltd; Project No. 93 -303, dated and
received March 2, 1993;
(3) South Elevation Cross - Section; submitted by Mr. A. Patel; received June 18, 1992;
(4) Garden Shed Cross - Sections; prepared by AMR Engineering Ltd.; Project No. 93 -303; dated
and received March 2, 1993.
(k) John Boddy Developments
To pipe the remainder of an existing tributary, from Riverside Drive to Church Street, in the
Town of Ajax, Duffin Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Forest Ridge Subdivision Grading Plans; prepared by John Boddy Engineering Inc.; Drawing
No.s 108, 109, 113, 115, 120; received on February 5, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B27
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(I) The Regional Municipality of Peel
To alter a watercourse, on Part Lot 11, Concession 6 WHS, (Airport Road /Bovaird Drive), in
the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by The Region of Peel - Department of Public Works; Project No. 92 -4090;
Drawing 14073 -D, dated revised February 22, 1993; Drawing 14080 -D, dated May 5,
1992; received March 1, 1993.
(2) Landscape Drawings; prepared by Graham Hess & Associates; Project 92 -4090; Drawing
No. Sheet 1 of 1; received on March 8, 1993
(m) The City of Mississauga - Transportation and Works Dept.
To place fill within a regulated area, construct within a flood plain and alter a waterway,
from Burnhamthorpe Road to 600 metres south of Bloor Street, in the City of Mississauga,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans: prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd; Job 10- 90046- 09 -DC1; Drawing No.
EC -2A dated February 1993; Drawing Numbers L -1, L -2, L -3, L -4, L -5; G -1, G -2, G -3, G -4,
G -5, G -6; D -1, D -2; S -1, S -2 dated July 1992; received March 10, 1993;
(2) Letter of Undertaking from The City of Mississauga dated March 11, 1993.
(o) Captain Developments
To construct within the flood plain and alter a watercourse, on Lot 17, Concession 3,
(North of 16th Avenue, West of Woodbine Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Pond Outlet/Woodbine Crossing; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman; Project No.
88577; Drawing Number 121, Dated February 1992; received April 24, 1992;
(2) Erosion /Siltation Control Plan; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman; Project No. 88577;
Drawing Number 802, Dated May 1990; received June 30, 1992;
(3) Pond 2F and Pond 2F Details; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman; Project No. 88577;
Drawing Number 504, dated January 1991; Drawing No. 505, dated January 1992;
received January 25, 1993;
(4) Pond 2F - Landscape Plan; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman; Project No. 92840;
Drawing Number L1, dated revised March 10, 1993; received March 11, 1993.
B28 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993.
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(a) The Rouse Valley Foundation
To place organic mulch in order to conduct plantings, on Part Lot 10, Concession 6,
(Highway 7 and Kennedy Road, Unionville), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
Watershed
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Restoration Plan for Site A; Drawing No. 1; prepared by The Rouge Valley Foundation;
revised as received on March 10, 1993.
(q) The City of Toronto, Real Estate Division
To install a sanitary and storm sewer to service the CN facilities, on Part Lot 15,
Concession BFC, (Don River and the Canadian National Railway [Don Sorting Yard]), in the
City of Toronto, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Sewer Easement Plan and Profile; Drawing No. S1 - S4; Project No. 3350 -03; prepared by
M.M. Dillon; revised as received on February 21, 1992.
NEW BUSINESS
NOTICE OF RETIREMENT OF TOM BARBER, DIRECTOR, PROGRAM SERVICES
Craig Mather had in hand a letter from Tom Barber, Director, Program Services, dated March 10,
1993, confirming his intention to retire from the Authority as of May 1, 1993.
Res. #E24/96
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT the Executive Committee receive the letter from Tom Barber, Director, Program Services,
dated March 10, 1993, with egret.
AND FURTHER THAT best wishes and appreciation for the contribution made to the Authority be
extended.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/93, MARCH 12, 1993 B29
EVALUATION AND REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE
Craig Mather informed the Committee that he will be forwarding a report to Executive Committee
Meeting #2/93, on April 2, 1993, on the short term organizational structure of Program Services.
It was requested that the Evaluation and Review Sub - Committee meet in the near future.
Res. #E25/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Lorna Jackson
THAT the Evaluation and Review Sub - Committee be expanded to include the Executive Committee.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:00 a.m., March 12, 1993.
William B. Granger J. Craisa Mather
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
/bb.
CARRIED
c.
Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
erthe metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
minutes
APRIL 2, 1993
B30
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #2/93
The Executive Committee met at the Authority office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday,
April 2, 1993. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m.
Res. #E26/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Committee sit as a Hearing Board.
PRESENT FOR HEARING:
Following the roll call, a hearing re:
Lorna Jackson
Lois Hancey
CARRIED
Chair William Granger
Vice -Chair Lois Hancey
Members Patrick Abtan (for R. O'Brien)
Lorna Jackson
Kip Van Kempen (for L. Griffin)
Richard Pilarski
For permission to construct a chain -link fence in the flood plain of Mimico Creek on Lot 6,
Plan 718, (257 Berry Road), in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed.
A staff presentation was made by John Maletich, Manager, Regulation Administration, and Don
Prince, Manager, Property.
Richard Pilarski gave a video presentation and spoke to the request for the above quoted permit
application.
Res. #E27/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Hearing Board consider this matter in closed session.
The Hearing Board rose from closed session.
Lorna Jackson
Lois Hanci:y
t CARRIED
B31 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
DECISION OF HEARING BOARD
THAT the application for a permit, pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, by Richard Pilarski for
permission to construct a chain -link fence in the flood plain of Mimico Creek on Lot 6, Plan 718,
(257 Berry Road), in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed, be refused as it will affect the
control of flooding and increase risk to life and property.
Res. #E28/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Executive Committee Meeting reconvene.
Lois Hancey
Lorna Jackson
CARRIED
PRESENT FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING: Chair William Granger
Vice -Chair Lois Hancey
Members Patrick Abtan
(for R. O'Brien)
Lorna Jackson
Kip Van Kempen
(for L. Griffin)
ABSENT FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING: Members
MINUTES
Res. #E29/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/93 be approved.
CORRESPONDENCE
Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
Paul Palleschi
Jim Witty
(a) Memorandum from Councillor Brian Harrison, dated March 30, 1993.
Res. #E30/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Lorna Jackson
CARRIED
Patrick Abtan
Kip Van Kempen
THAT Councillor Harrison's memorandum with respect to a nomination for the Honour Roll Awards
and to item one, being a request for exchange of Lands in the Scarborough sector of the Lake
Ontario Waterfront, be received.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B32
CORRESPONDENCE
(b) Letter from Heather and Claudio Engli, dated March 20, 1993, re: Proposed Disposal of
Surplus Authority Land, west side of Glen Major Road, Town of Uxbridge.
(c) Facsimile from R.F. Deval, dated March 1993, re: Proposed Disposal of Surplus Authority
Land, west side of Glen Major Road, Town of Uxbridge.
Res. #E31/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Kip Van Kempen
Lorna Jackson
THAT the correspondence from Heather and Claudio Engli and the facsimile from R.F. Deval with
respect to item four, Potential Disposal of Surplus Authority Land, West side of Glen Major Road,
Township of Uxbridge, be received.
CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. REQUEST FOR EXCHANGE OF LANDS IN THE SCARBOROUGH SECTOR OF THE LAKE
ONTARIO WATERFRONT
KEY ISSUE
The Authority is in receipt of a proposal from Gwen Agboat, the representative of the owner of a
property situate on the Scarborough Bluffs at 463 Guildwood Parkway, to exchange the property
for a potentially surplus parcel of Authority -owned land.
Res. #E32/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the request for exchange of lands received
from Gwen Agboat be referred to Authority staff for review, in accordance with Authority policies.
AND FURTHER THAT a report recommending further action in this matter be brought forth to the
Executive Committee at a future date.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority has had ongoing discussions with Gwen Agboat and Gino Garritano, regarding the
potential purchase of a property by the Authority situate on the Scarborough Bluffs at 463
Guildwood Parkway, in the City of Scarborough. The property was purchased by the owners on
December 4, 1989, at a purchase price of $285,000.00 and was recently appraised by an
independent appraiser at $215,000.00.
B33 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. REQUEST FOR EXCHANGE OF LANDS IN THE SCARBOROUGH SECTOR OF THE LAKE
ONTARIO WATERFRONT
The owners have recently indicted to the Authority that they are prepared to consider a sale at
5215,000.00, however, because of financial constraints and other priorities for limited funding
available, other alternatives are being explored.
The Authority -owned property at 139 Sylvan Avenue consists of the former Hugo and Freda Daues
property purchased by the Authority in 1981. The property consisting of an extremely deep lot
with an existing residence situate in the immediate vicinity of the edge of the Scarborough Bluffs
was purchased by the Authority for erosion control purposes. Remedial works have now been
carried out in this area and the staff carried out earlier preliminary work in response to a proposal
from Mr. Daues to repurchase a portion of the property. Mr. Daues dropped his proposal to
repurchase the property and has since moved from the property.
A copy of the proposal of March 21, 1993, from Gwen Agboat was circulated with the Agenda.
2. CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF VAUGHAN
- Request for a permanent easement for an overland flow outlet north of Langstaff Road,
east of Highway #27
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from the Corporation of the City of Vaughan to provide a permanent easement
for an overland flow outlet, located north of Langstaff Road, east of Highway #27.
Res. #E33/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request
from the Corporation of the City of Vaughan to provide a permanent easement for an overland flow
outlet located north of Langstaff Road, east of Highway #27;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co- operate
with the Corporation of the City of Vaughan in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.070 hectares, more or less, (0.174 acres) be granted to
the Corporation of the City of Vaughan for an overland flow outlet, said land being Part of Lot 12,
Concession 8, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, designated as Part 1 on a Plan of
Survey prepared by A. Skranda Surveying Ltd. under their Project No. 4570 -24;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 834
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF VAUGHAN (CONTD.)
- Request for a permanent easement for an overland flow outlet north of Langstaff Road,
east of Highway #27
THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Corporation of the City of Vaughan has conveyed lands to the Authority over the years for the
nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that this easement be granted for the nominal
consideration of $2.00. The Corporation of the City of Vaughan has agreed to assume all legal,
survey and other costs involved in completing the transaction.
The subject lands were acquired from Highway #27 - Langstaff Holdings Inc. in July, 1991, under
the Humber River Flood Plain Lands component of the Land Acquisition Project.
A map showing the general location of the property and a plan illustrating the specific location was
available at the meeting.
3. THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
- Conveyance of land for the extension of Matheson Boulevard from Creekbank Road to
Explorer Drive, City of Mississauga
KEY ISSUE
The Corporation of the City of Mississauga has requested conveyance of a small parcel of
Authority -owned land for the extension of Matheson Boulevard from Creekbank Road to Explorer
Drive, City of Mississauga.
Res. #E34/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request
from The Corporation of the City of Mississauga for conveyance of a small parcel of Authority -
owned land required for the extension of Matheson Boulevard from Creekbank Road to Explorer
Drive, City of Mississauga;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co- operate
with The Corporation of the City of Mississauga in this instance;
B35 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA (CONTD.)
- Conveyance of land for the extension of Matheson Boulevard from Creekbank Road to
Explorer Drive, City of Mississauga
THAT a small parcel of Authority -owned land containing 0.121 hectares, more or less, (0.300
acres) be conveyed to The Corporation of the City of Mississauga for the extension of Matheson
Boulevard from Creekbank Road to Explorer Drive, City of Mississauga, said land being part of
Block I, Registered Plan 924, City of Mississauga, Regional Municipality of Peel, designated as
Parts 13 & 14, on Plan 43R- 19642;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THAT said conveyance be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Corporation of the City of Mississauga has requested that this parcel be conveyed for the
nominal consideration of $2.00 and has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved
in completing this transaction.
The subject lands were acquired from Siscoe Metals of Ontario Ltd. in May 1972 under the
Etobicoke Creek Flood Plain Lands Component of the Land Acquisition Project.
A map showing the general location of the property and a plan illustrating the specific location was
available at the meeting.
4. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND
-West Side of Glen Major Road, Township of Uxbridge
KEY ISSUE
To recommend disposal of surplus Authority owned land in the Township of Uxbridge situated on
the west side of Glen Major Road.
Res. #E35/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Kip Van Kempen
Lorna Ja : kson
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a residential lot together with a dilapidated
frame dwelling with frontage on the west side of Glen Major Road known as all of Lot 3, as shown
on a Plan of Glensharrard and Part of Lot 2, Concession 7, Township of Uxbridge, Regional
Municipality of Durham be declared as surplus to the requirements of the Authority;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B36
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND (CONTD.)
-West Side of Glen Major Road, Township of Uxbridge
AND FURTHER THAT the availability of the subject land be advertised publicly for sale at market
value.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
All verbal comments through telephone calls and from the Public Information Session held on March
17, 1993, and all written submissions have been very positive and no objections to this disposal
have been received. No parties were interested in making a formal submission to the Executive
Committee on April 2, 1993, regarding this proposal.
RATIONALE
Staff feel that it is essential that in the management of the Authority's resources that every effort
possible be made to assist in reducing the funding requirements from the taxpayers, and
accordingly, the disposal of this land if suitable arrangements can be made, is in the best interest of
the Authority and the public.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the funds generated from the sale of this surplus land be utilized to acquire
additional environmentally sensitive and conservation land in the Oakridges Moraine and
headwaters of the Authority's area of jurisdiction.
5. REPORT #1193 OF THE RECOGNITION /EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AWARD
SUB - COMMITTEE
KEY ISSUE
Meeting #1 /93 of the Recognition /Employee Suggestion Award Sub - Committee was held on Friday,
March 5, 1993, at the Authority's Head Office. Those present were: William Granger, Lois
Hancey and Patrick Abtan.
Res. #E36/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Kip Van Kempen
THE RECOGNITION /EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AWARD SUB - COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE
AUTHORITY THAT the John A. McGinnis Heritage Conservation Lecture be established at Black
Creek Pioneer Village to recognize the contribution and leadership of John A. McGinnis as Authority
Chair, February, 1990, to February, 1992;
B37 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. REPORT #1193 OF THE RECOGNITION /EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AWARD
SUB - COMMITTEE (CONTD.)
THAT the Authority's Arbor Day Ceremony be held on Friday, April 23, 1993, as part of the Earth
Week Events, at Black Creek Pioneer Village;
THAT Honour Roll Awards be presented at the Arbor Day Ceremony to:
Al Merritt, Paul Wharton, and Steve Bacsalmasi
Shell Canada Limited
Dr. Harry Leith
The Honourable Bud Wildman;
THAT in accordance with the Authority's Recognition Policy, Service Recognition Awards be
presented at the Garden Party, on Friday, June 25, 1993, at Black Creek Pioneer Village;
THAT Scrolls of Appreciation be presented at the Garden Party to:
Lakefront Owners Association
Brian Dexter
Ontario Egg Producers' Marketing Board;
AND FURTHER THAT letters of appreciation be sent from the Chair to:
Eileen Higdon, Save Our Bay Group
Congregation of The Church of the Advent.
AMENDMENT Moved by: Kip Van Kempen
Res. #37 Seconded by: Lorna Jackson
THAT Eileen Higdon, Save Our Bay Group, be presented with a Scroll of Appreciation rather than
receive a letter of appreciation.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B38
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
6. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 -1994
- Colonel Samuel Smith Park - Consultant Selection
KEY ISSUE
To retain the services of consulting engineers to complete the final design and tender documents .
for site lighting at Colonel Samuel Smith Park, City of Etobicoke.
Res. #E38/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the proposal for final design of site lighting for Colonel Samuel Smith
Park from Proctor and Redfern Limited be accepted at the revised upset limit of S12,200 (excluding
GST), which includes a contingency allowance of $2,500.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 1992, the Authority completed the first phase of site servicing to the park. This work included
the complete installation of watermains, sanitary sewer forcemain and the high voltage primary
electrical cables and main transformer.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Final design drawings will be completed for site lighting for the park. This will include lighting
requirements for the main park roadway, parking lot, public boardwalk, waterfront trail and
navigation lighting.
The consultants will use the Design Guidelines developed by the Authority to guide them in the
selection of appropriate Tight fixtures and poles as well as determining the level of lighting required
to ensure that public safety is achieved. This component of work will require consultation with
Metro Toronto Parks Department staff and other approval agencies.
Finally, the consultants will prepare contract documents and drawings for tendering and will
oversee the installation of the services.
The consulting firms of Moon -Matz Limited, Proctor and Redfern Limited and Marshall Macklin
Monaghan have been invited to submit proposals for their services.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are budgeted in the Lake Ontario Waterfront Regeneration Project 1992 -1994 under Account
No. 204 -07.
RATIONALE
Three proposals for site lighting design were received as follows:
Proctor and Redfern Ltd.
Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd.
Moon -Matz Ltd.
S 9,200.
19,560.
19,900.
B39 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
6. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 -1994 (CONTD.)
- Colonel Samuel Smith Park - Consultant Selection
All proposal costs did not include the Goods and Services Tax. The Proctor and Redfern Ltd.,
proposal did not include a total cost for disbursements, but indicated these costs would be billed at
cost plus 5 %. In addition, their proposal did not include an allowance for the preliminary design
that would be required. In reviewing this matter with Proctor and Redfern, they requested that
their proposal be revised to include an upset limit for disbursements, expenses etc., of $500 plus
an upset limit for preliminary engineering of $2,500. It is recommended that their original proposal
cost plus the disbursement cost be accepted and a contingency amount of $2,500 be approved to
allow for extra costs, if necessary, associated with any extensive review of lighting fixtures, details
and preliminary engineering.
All other components of their proposal were satisfactory and staff recommend acceptance of their
revised proposal.
7. EASTERN BEACHES EROSION
-City of Toronto
A video showing flooding caused by the April 1, 1993, storm was presented by Nigel Cowey.
KEY ISSUE
High lake level conditions of Lake Ontario has caused beach erosion along sections of Eastern
Beaches, City of Toronto, resulting in potential risk to life and property.
Res. #E39/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Kip Van Kempen
Patrick Abtan
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the staff report concerning a request from the City of Toronto to have
the Authority carry out shoreline protection works in the Eastern Beaches be received;
THAT staff be directed to proceed with emergency shoreline protection at a cost not to exceed
$40,000;
THAT staff be directed to retain the consulting firm of Atria Engineering and Hydraulics Inc., to
assist in the design of shoreline protection works at a cost not to exceed $8,000;
THAT staff be directed to submit a project file to the province for consideration of funding in 1993
to carry out interim shoreline protection, coastal study and final shoreline protection;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Toronto be advised of the action the Authority will take.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B40
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. EASTERN BEACHES EROSION (CONTD.)
-City of Toronto
BACKGROUND
The last period of high lake level conditions in 1986/87 resulted in shoreline erosion between
Neville Park Blvd. and Munro Park Ave., along Toronto's Eastern Beaches. The Authority was
unable to obtain funding from the province to carry out the necessary shoreline protective works.
Since a section of storm sewer was threatened, the City of Toronto completed emergency remedial
work and the final shoreline protection.
In 1989, the Authority completed a Shoreline Management Study for the entire Eastern Beaches
from Nursewood Road to Ashbridges Bay Park. This study included a detailed coastal processes
analysis and provided recommendations for ongoing monitoring and shoreline treatment for areas of
concern.
A study of the Eastern Beaches shoreline in the vicinity of MacLaren Avenue is currently nearing
completion by Atria Engineering and Hydraulics Inc., for the City of Toronto. This study
investigated options for shoreline stability as part of the proposed Phase II Stormwater Detention
Tank. This study will provide recommendations for final shoreline protection fronting the Balmy
Beach Club; however, if approved, construction is not expected to start until late 1993.
We are again experiencing high lake levels for Lake Ontario, similar to 1986 conditions. The high
lake level is expected to continue at least over the next six months with the peak forecast for early
June.
Recent storm events has resulted in severe beach erosion along sections of the Eastern Beaches.
Correspondence has been received from the City of Toronto requesting that the Authority
undertake remedial shoreline protection works in the vicinity of Balmy Beach Club and at
Nursewood Road at Toronto's Eastern Beaches.
Authority staff have met on site with City of Toronto staff to inspect the shoreline conditions.
Beach erosion has undermined sections of the public boardwalk, groyne structures and storm
sewer. The most severe erosion has occurred at Nursewood Road where beach erosion has
resulted in private property damage due to wave overtopping. Two ground floor apartments at No.
2 Nursewood Road are at risk to further damage. One owner has recently boarded up the lakeward
windows. The next two months are a critical period with a rising lake level and prevalent storm
conditions.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Immediate action is required to provide interim protection for the 80 metres of shoreline fronting
the Nursewood Road apartment building. This work will need to be coordinated with the remedial
work proposed by the City of Toronto. Staff will investigate options for emergency shoreline
protection works to be carried out as soon as possible.
A study will be required to design final shoreline protection.
B41 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. EASTERN BEACHES EROSION (CONTD.)
-City of Toronto
Authority staff will submit a project file to the province requesting additional funding to undertake
the interim shoreline protection, study and final shoreline protection. Projects of this nature are
ranked on the Provincial priority list for funding. Because of the potential risk to life and property
at the Nursewood Road apartment building, it is hopeful that some funding will be approved.
A report on high lake levels and areas of concern will be submitted to the next Water and Related
Land Management Advisory Board meeting.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Staff will review funding options for the interim protection work from local priority funding or
reallocation from existing erosion control projects.
Subject to availability of funding, this work would be carried out under the Metropolitan Toronto
Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project 1992 -1996.
8. DRAFT ROUGE PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN
- January 1993
KEY ISSUE
To provide Authority comments to the Director, Greater Toronto Area Branch, Ministry of Natural
Resources, on the Draft Rouge Park Management Plan released in January 1993.
Res. #E40/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
THAT the staff report and recommendations concerning the Draft Rouge Park Management Plan,
January 1993, be received and adopted;
THAT the Province clarify whether the definition of the valley corridor limit, used in the Draft Rouge
Park Management Plan, is based on the functional requirements of the valley system or on the need
to accommodate park values;
THAT the province reconsider the inclusion of the Morningside tributary within the park boundaries
and alternative methods of ensuring environmental restoration of this watercourse;
THAT the Rouge River Comprehensive Basin Management Strategy be the starting point for the
development of the Watershed Strategy recommended in the Draft Rouge Park Management Plan;
THAT the Authority coordinate the update and expansion of the Rouge Comprehensive Basin
Management Strategy to reflect the objectives of the approved Rouge Valley Park Plan;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B42
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. DRAFT ROUGE PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN (CONTD.)
- January 1993
THAT the Authority continue toward the development of a Watershed Management Strategy for
each of the watersheds under its jurisdiction in order to ensure their protection, restoration and
enhancement;
THAT, in the opinion of the Authority, future management of the Rouge Park should be the
responsibility of one or more existing agencies and that consideration be given to a management
partnership of publicly accountable agencies.
THAT the final Rouge Park Plan include identification of the costs of implementation; the sources of
funding; and, wherever possible, the delegation of specific responsibilities and funding to existing
publicly accountable agencies; and further,
AND FURTHER THAT copies of this report and recommendations be forwarded to the Director,
Greater Toronto Area Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs, the
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, the Regional Municipalities of Durham and York, and the area
municipalities of Markham, Pickering and Scarborough for their information.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
On March 26, 1990, the Province of Ontario announced the intent to establish a major park in the
Rouge River Valley and, subsequently, appointed the Rouge Valley Park Advisory Committee. The
Committee's tasks were to prepare a recommended plan for the park area located south of Steeles
Avenue and to recommend a strategy and time frame for the proposed park north of Steeles. The
Advisory Committee submitted its recommendations to the Minister of Natural Resources in
August, 1992.
The Authority was represented on the Advisory Committee. In addition, Authority staff have
reviewed earlier phases of the development of the draft plan and provided both input and comment
for consideration by the Advisory Committee.
Comments on the Draft Plan are required by April 19, 1993. Authority staff, through the Technical
Advisory Committee on Parks and Conservation, have worked with staff of Metropolitan Toronto in
preparing comments on issues of mutual interest. A copy of the staff report that will be considered
by a joint meeting of Metropolitan Committees is being forwarded to you with this communication
for information.
DETAILS OF THE PROPOSAL
The Draft Park Plan applies to the Rouge Park area south of Steeles Avenue. Within this area, the
park boundary, where it is adjacent to the river valley, is based on a series of criteria, resulting in
the following:
(a) in undeveloped areas adjacent to the valley the park boundary will be the outer limit
of the valley corridor which is defined as 30 metres from the stable top -of -bank;
B43 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. DRAFT ROUGE PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN (CONTD.)
- January 1993
(b) in developed areas adjacent to the valley the park boundary will be the landowner's
rear property line OR the stable top -of -bank where the private landowner owns a
large section of valleyland. Where comprehensive redevelopment occurs, the •
criteria in (a) would be used, if possible. For a single lot severance, the park
boundary would be the stable top -of -bank.
The Authority's draft Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program recommends the outer limit
of the valley corridor be established as 10 metres from the 'le top -of- slope. It should be
clarified, by the province, whether it is proposing to define t; . functional requirement of all valley
corridors as extending 30 metres beyond the stable top -of -bank or whether this .criteria is specific
to the Rouge and intended to protect park values rather than the functional integrity of the valley.
The Authority will be considering all comments received on the Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program during the first half of 1993. Where there are valid reasons for having
different criteria /definitions, these need to be clarified. Alternately, if there is a need for the
Authority to consider a larger setback to protect valley and stream corridor functions, this should
be identified as soon as possible.
RECOMMENDATION: That the province clarify whether the definition of the valley corridor limit,
used in the draft Rouge Park Management Plan, is based on the functional
requirements of the valley system or on the need to accommodate park
values.
The Draft Plan includes the Morningside Tributary of the Rouge system within the redefined Park
boundaries in order to ensure its environmental regeneration. While there is agreement that work
does need to be undertaken to address this concern, inclusion of these lands in the Park is not
necessary. Acquisition of these lands would be very costly and their function in the Park system
limited. The issue of regeneration can be addressed through the preparation of an updated
watershed management strategy for the Rouge system.
RECOMMENDATION: That the province reconsider the inclusion of the Morningside tributary
within the park boundaries and alternative methods of ensuring
environmental restoration of this watercourse.
The draft plan recommends that "a watershed management strategy should be developed and
implemented to protect and restore the integrity of ecological linkages and aquatic ecosystems
throughout the watershed ". The Authority has completed the Rouge River Comprehensive Basin
Management Strategy which addresses many of the resource management issues discussed in the
draft plan. It would, however, need to be updated and expanded to address all issues.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Rouge River Comprehensive Basin Management Strategy be the
starting point for the development of the watershed strategy recommended
in the draft plan, and
That the Authority coordinate the update and expansion of the strategy to
reflect the objectives of the approved Rouge Valley Park Plan.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B44
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. DRAFT ROUGE PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN (CONTD.)
- January 1993
The proposal to establish the Rouge Park and the development of the draft plan have focused
attention, across the greater Toronto Area (GTA), on the Rouge watershed. Concurrently, the
work of the Waterfront Commission and the review of the Planning Act have provided forums for
the identification of public interest in the protection, restoration, and enhancement of watershed
resources. It is important that the management needs of the other watersheds and the protection
of greenspace resources, across the GTA, not be considered to end with the adoption of the Rouge
Park plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Authority continue toward the development of a watershed
management strategy for each of the watersheds under its jurisdiction in
order to ensure their protection, restoration and enhancement.
The Authority is one of the largest public landowners within the park. Authority lands have been
identified, on maps to the Plan, as "Public Agency lands and waters proposed for park purposes ".
Further, under the section on IMPLEMENTATION, the first item identified is to "negotiate
agreement with Metropolitan Toronto and MTRCA in order that the MTRCA lands can be managed
as part of the park ". Elsewhere in the draft plan it is stated that "public land owners within the
park will be encouraged to manage their lands in accordance with this plan ".
The Authority, in its earlier comments to the Park Advisory Committee, offered itself as an agency
with an existing ability to manage the Park. No recommendation has been made in the draft plan.
The requirements of the management agency are described on page 10 as:
experience in areas of resource management and research, land use regulation and
monitoring, recreational management and programming, park administration, agency
negotiation; and,
must have the legislative mandate to manage and operate the park.
There are a number of existing agencies that fulfil these requirements. If there are compelling
reasons not to delegate responsibility to one existing agency, then an alternative that represents a
partnership of existing publicly accountable agencies should be developed. Authority
representation and participation would be based on its interests as a landowner and watershed
manager.
RECOMMENDATION: That, in the opinion of the Authority, future management of the Rouge Park
should be the responsibility of one or more existing agencies and that
consideration be given to a management partnership of publicly accountable
agencies.
Regardless of whether an existing or new management agency is eventually used, there are
significant planning and development activities required to bring the park plan to fruition including:
develop and implement a trails system
develop and implement management plans for vegetation, fauna, aquatic
ecosystem, landform /geology, and heritage resources
B45 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. DRAFT ROUGE PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN (CONTD.)
- January 1993
identify suitable locations for and build an interpretive centre and a parks
administration office/ maintenance yard
establish a plan review function and staffing
develop a detailed land acquisition plan and funding strategy
develop natural and cultural heritage interpretive plan and parks operations plan
develop a park volunteer program and a private land stewardship program.
The preceding is a partial list of the work anticipated to bring the recommended plan into being.
The cost of the recommended plan has not been detailed nor has the source of funding, although
alternatives have been suggested. There is an anticipation that the federal government will provide
the $10 million dollars that was promised a number of years ago. Regardless of whether this
money is available and can be used to assist at the outset in carrying out the detailed studies and
site development proposed in the plan, there will be an ongoing staffing requirement to manage the
park, deliver interpretive programs, and provide a plan review function related to the protection of
park values. These responsibilities will be incremental to the work currently undertaken by public
land managers in the Rouge area. The Final Plan needs to address the issues of anticipated cost
and funding sources.
RECOMMENDATION: That the final Rouge Park Plan include identification of the costs of
implementation; the sources of funding; and, wherever possible, the
delegation of specific responsibilities and funding to existing publicly
accountable agencies.
9. NIAGARA ESCARPMENT PLAN REVIEW HEARING
- Report of the Hearing Officers, March 24, 1993
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of the Report of the Hearing Officers on the Niagara Escarpment Plan Review.
Res. #E41/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
THAT the staff report, with respect to the report of the Hearing Officers concerning the Niagara
Escarpment Plan Review, be received.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B46
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. NIAGARA ESCARPMENT PLAN REVIEW HEARING (CONTD.)
-Report of the Hearing Officers, March 24, 1993
BACKGROUND
In 1967, the Select Committee on Conservation Authorities recommended that the province,
through consultation involving specific ministries, agencies and the public, develop a "long range
policy and comprehensive plan for the Niagara Escarpment ". In 1973, the Niagara Escarpment
Planning and Development Act was passed and the Niagara Escarpment Commission formed to
prepare a plan for the Escarpment. The Commission prepared and released "Preliminary Proposals ",
in 1978; a "Proposed Plan ", in 1979; and a "Final Proposed Plan ", in 1983, following public
hearings. This document was submitted to the Provincial Secretary for Resources Development,
circulated for comment and adopted in 1985.
The Plan incorporated a requirement for a five year review by the Commission. This commenced in
1990 and in January 1991 the Commission released "Proposed Revisions to the Niagara
Escarpment Plan ". In this connection, there were a number of issues that were of interest to the
Authority and the Executive Committee, at its Meeting #13/91, held November 15, 1991 adopted
Resolution #252/91;
"That staff be directed to participate with representatives of the other Conservation
Authorities within the Niagara Escarpment Plan area in preparing and presenting a position
statement for the Hearings being held in connection with the update of the Niagara
Escarpment Plan."
The concerns to be addressed, at that time, related to additional requirements proposed to apply to
the lands owned by the authorities within the Plan area. Authority staff worked with staff of the
other authorities and a presentation was made to the Hearing Officers.
The Hearing Officers have now completed their review of and hearing on the "Proposed Revisions"
and have filed their findings and recommendations with the Minister of Environment and Energy
and with the Niagara Escarpment Commission. The Executive Summary of their 400 page report is
appended for information.
ISSUES AND PROCESS
The following are the principal findings and recommendations of the Hearing Officers:
(1) That the Niagara Escarpment Plan has proven its value as the cornerstone for
protection of this unique heritage.
(2) That plan implementation, particularly development control, should now be
delegated to regional municipalities and counties.
(3) That the Commission focus its attention to the critical roles of monitoring, research
and education.
(4) That the cooperative approach to management of the Parks System be expanded
and strengthened through the establishment of a Coordinating Council, made up of
representatives of owners and managers of land in the System with the Commission
as Secretariat to the Council.
B47 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. NIAGARA ESCARPMENT PLAN REVIEW HEARING (CONTD.)
- Report of the Hearing Officers, March 24, 1993
(5) That the one unresolved issue, identified in many of the submissions, is the long-
term protection of the quality and quantity of water resources.
(6) That the majority of the Commission's Proposed Revisions to the plan be rejected.
The next step in this process is the review of the Hearing Officers' report and recommendations by
the Commission. While no time limit is given for this review, staff at the Commission have
indicated their intention to reply as quickly as possible, by late May or in June. The Commission
will then submit their review to the Minister, who, after considering the final reports of both the
Hearing Officers and the Commission, will make recommendations to Cabinet.
At this point in the process, there is no provision for nor indication of an opportunity for public
comment. Further public participation is provided for later in the process but only if the Minister's
recommendations to Cabinet disagree with those of the Hearing Officers'. Given that scenario,
there would be a 21 day period for public comment.
Staff will continue to monitor this process and provide this report for the information of the
Executive Committee.
10. KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION
- Concept Plan
KEY ISSUE
The development of a Concept Plan requires a firm vision for the Kortright Centre for Conservation.
Input will be sought from Authority members, staff and local community groups.
Res. #E42/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
THAT the Kortright Centre for Conservation Concept Planning process include any necessary
revision of the Vision - Mission Statement, Goals and Objectives in consultation with Authority
members, staff and representatives of the public;
THAT the Authority Chair and Vice -Chair and the Chair and Vice -Chair of the Conservation and
Land Management Advisory Board represent the Authority in the review of the Kortright Vision;
THAT the rate -payer groups adjacent to Kortright be invited to appoint a representative and users
of Kortright to be invited to participate in the review of the Vision;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to use the services of a facilitator to guide the Visioning
portion of the Concept Plan process.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B48
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION (CONTD.)
- Concept Plan
BACKGROUND
The Strategy for Public Use of Conservation Authority Lands (1988), identified the need for
concept plans for each of the Conservation Areas, the Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Kortright
Centre for Conservation. Resolution #253 was approved by the Executive Committee on February
12, 1993, to implement the Conservation Area Development Project which included the Concept
Plan of the Kortright Centre for Conservation.
In order to prepare a Concept Plan, it is important to reaffirm or revise, if necessary, a Vision for
the Kortright Centre of Conservation. To carry out this stage of the exercise, a focus group
workshop will be held that will involve Kortright and other Authority staff, Authority members, rate-
payer and general public participants. The public participants will be reached through the Kortright
members newsletter and on site promotion of the review of the Vision. To ensure that the focus
group achieves the desired result, the services of an independent facilitator will be used. The result
will be prepared for presentation to the June meeting of the Conservation and Related Land
Management Advisory Board.
The remaining steps in preparing a concept plan for the Centre include the review and revision of
terms of reference for a staff supervised consultant study of recreation /education facility and
program needs. A draft report of the results will be presented to the Conservation and Related Land
Management Advisory Board by the Fall of 1993.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for both the Visioning and the Concept planning process are available in the 1993 budget.
11. APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
KEY ISSUE
Appointment of Enforcement Officer to administer Fill and Construction Regulations.
Res. #E43/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
THAT Renee P. Jarrett be appointed as an Enforcement Officer for the purpose of enforcing
regulations made by The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, pursuant to
Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act.
CARRIED
B49 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER (CONTD.)
BACKGROUND
The Conservation Authorities Act provides for an Authority to appoint Enforcement Officers to
enforce its regulations. For the purpose of enforcing the regulations made by The Metropolitan
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, pursuant to Section 28(1) of the Conservation
Authorities Act, it is necessary for the Authority to appoint Renee Jarrett, Manager of Plan Review
Section as an Enforcement Officer. This designation is necessary to permit her to enforce the Fill
and Construction Regulations pursuant to Section 28(1) of the Conservation Authorities Act.
Presently the Director of Water Resource Division, the Manager of Regulation Administration and
the Manager of Enforcement Safety and Security have this appointment. As the Manager of Plan
Review Section, Mrs. Jarrett should have the powers to facilitate the enforcement of our
regulations as she has the responsibility to oversee this program.
12. APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS
- October, November, December 1992
KEY ISSUE
Request for approval of the accounts for October, November and December 1992.
Res. #E44/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
THAT expenditures for the months of October, November, December of 1992, in the amount of
$23,340,700 be approved.
CARRIED
ANALYSIS
The accounts for the period are higher than usual because of the acquisition of Canada Post at a
cost of almost $15 million.
13. THE TORONTO BONSAI SOCIETY
KEY ISSUE
The Toronto Bonsai Society is seeking a site for a permanent Bonsai display at the Kortright Centre
for Conservation.
Res. #E45/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the presentation of the Toronto Bonsai Society be received;
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B50
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
13. THE TORONTO BONSAI SOCIETY
THAT staff be directed to consider the proposal when developing the concept plan for the Kortright
Centre for Conservation.
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Conservation and Related Land Management
Advisory Board on the Bonsai proposal.
14. BOYD CONSERVATION AREA CONCEPT PLAN
-Water Play Area - Servicing
KEY ISSUE
Upgrading of the Islington Avenue sewer to service the proposed Boyd Water Play Area.
Res. #E46/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
CARRIED
THAT staff discuss options with the City of Vaughan for the proposed sewer upgrade which would
be required for a Water Play Area in the Boyd Conservation Area, and report back to the
Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In planning the Water Play Area at the Boyd Conservation Area, staff requested of the City of
Vaughan to provide adequate servicing of the proposed development. The Authority share
calculated on the basis of the conceptual plan for the Water Play area accommodated for 39.20%
of the estimated total flow of the sewer and was estimated to cost just over $400,000.
The City has required the developer to provide a Letter -of- Credit to cover the $400,000 additional
cost. The developer (Seaton Group) has requested the Authority to indicate when or if the facility
is likely to be developed. Should the facility not likely be developed the Seaton Group would
request the City to reduce the size requirements of the sewer and the Letter -of- Credit.
While the plan of the Water Play facility was approved by the Authority and the Region of York, the
capital cost was estimated at approximately $5,000,000. The capital financing of nearly
$5,000,000 was obtained from property sales but was largely used for the purchase of property
(Walker) as directed by the Minister of Natural Resources.
Staff believe that it is highly unlikely that this project would be of sufficient priority to be financed
in the foreseeable future, therefore the Authority should advise the City that the increased sewer
capacity is not required for the Water Play Area at this time.
B51 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION 11 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA
- Ebenezer Tract
- Equestrian Facilities - Humber College
KEY ISSUE
Humber College is redeveloping the site occupied by their Equestrian Department and are
requesting a site on Authority lands to accommodate their equestrian activities.
Res. #E47/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
THAT the proposal by Humber College to develop an Equestrian Facility on the Ebenezer Resource
Management Tract, Claireville Conservation Area, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to investigate the feasibility of establishing suitable
equestrian facilities in co- operation with Humber College; Equine Recreation Enterprise Ltd.; and
such other equestrian groups, as may be appropriate; and report back to the Conservation and
Related Land Management Advisory Board once such uses have been confirmed as suitable under
the revised strategy for the Public Use of Authority Lands.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Ebenezer Tract has been designated for Equestrian Uses in the Concept Plan for the Claireville
Conservation Area.
16. GREATER TORONTO REGION TRAIL SYSTEM - PHASE 1
- Routing Plan
KEY ISSUE
To finalize a Routing Plan for Phase 1 of the Greater Toronto Region Trail System.
Res. #E48/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
THAT the mapping for the Greater Toronto Region Trail System - Phase 1 as presented be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to present and discuss route alternatives for Phase I of the
Greater Toronto Region Trail System and obtain comments from member and local municipalities
and other appropriate groups.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B52
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. GREATER TORONTO REGION TRAIL SYSTEM - PHASE 1 (CONTD.)
- Routing Plan
BACKGROUND
The planning study was done to identify existing trails on public lands; to outlined proposed route
alternatives, as a basis to consult with affected municipalities, community and special interest
groups. The Geographic Information System (G.I.S.) mapping has been completed in preparation
for the public consultation process.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This plan was financed by a grant of S71,500 from The Ministry of Culture, Tourism and
Recreation, with the matching funds provided from Recreation Revenue Reserves.
17. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 -1994
- Toronto Waterfront Habitat Workshop - Consultant Selection
KEY ISSUE
To retain the services of a consultant to plan and facilitate a one day habitat workshop and develop
and print workshop proceedings.
Res #E49/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
THAT the firm of Gartner Lee Limited be retained to conduct a one day Toronto Waterfront Habitat
Workshop at a cost not to exceed $ 11,550.;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to take the necessary action to give effect to the contract.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Great Lakes Environment Office of Environment Canada approached the Authority and the
Ministry of Natural Resources to co -host a Toronto Waterfront Habitat Workshop. The intent of the
workshop is to bring together fisheries experts from around the Great Lakes and promote dialogue,
support, and provide direction to our collective habitat creation efforts within the Metro Toronto
and Region Remedial Action Plan. The workshop will assist the Authority, by promoting scientific
review of the habitat components of the Lake Ontario Waterfront Regeneration Project 1992 -
1994. The proceedings of this meeting will be a valuable component of the stage 3 document for
the Metro Toronto and Region RAP and will also aid the Ministry of Natural Resources in their
Habitat Management Plan for the Toronto Waterfront.
B53 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
17. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 -1994 (CONTD.)
- Toronto Waterfront Habitat Workshop - Consultant Selection
A consultant is required to facilitate this meeting and provide technical and logistical services for
the workshop. Terms of reference were established by the workshop steering committee and a
short list of consultants was invited to submit proposals. Consultants were contacted by the •
steering committee and written proposals were received from the following firms:
Gartner Lee Limited.
Tarrandus Associates.
Cummings Cockburn Limited.
Beak Consultants Limited.
RATIONALE
511,550
Submitted after closing time
Declir'"1
$ 12,000
The firm of Gartner Lee, as represented by Deborah Martins -Downs has a variety of experience
with the Toronto Waterfront extending back to 1985 when Ms. Martin -Downs undertook an
inventory of habitat types across the Toronto waterfront and summarized the existing body of data
on the effects of lakefill parks on the distribution and abundance of fish species in the nearshore.
Also at this time, Ms. Martin -Downs began to develop an urban fisheries program which included
an analysis of the potential of select locations on the Toronto Waterfront to provide recreational
opportunities. Part of this role involved the determination of factors which were limiting the sport
fishing potential of these areas.
At Gartner Lee, Ms. Martin -Downs has been involved with environmental approvals for several
waterfront properties, and is currently undertaking a shoreline site audit of the Canadian Forces
Base Trenton waterfront. Most recently, Ms. Martin -Downs has been providing expert services to
the Waterfront Regeneration Trust in support of their aquatic habitat plan for the Lake Ontario
Greenways Strategy.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The consultant will be responsible for the preparation of the workshop including correspondence,
structure of the workshop, detailing workshop topics, scheduling, location, and other details. The
consultant will conduct the workshop, ensure the effective management of the meeting including,
continuity, documentation of information resulting from the discussion groups and expert
presentations. Proceedings from the workshop will be developed, that provide a synopsis of the
information collected and discussed. The consultant will print 150 copies and distribute them to the
participants and the Remedial Action Plan office.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Total funding will be provided by the Great Lakes Environment Office of Environment Canada under
account No. 601 -72.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B54
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
18. TENDER OPENING SUB - COMMITTEE TENDER ED 93-05
- Tender for the Rental of Heavy Construction Equipment and Operator
KEY ISSUE
The Tender Opening Sub - Committee (Appendix TO.5/93) opened tenders for the supply of heavy
construction equipment and operators on March 26, 1992. The tenders received were referred to
staff for review and a report.
Res. #E50/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
THAT the Water Resource Division utilize, as required, the service of Sartor and Susin Limited for
the rental of construction equipment with operators during 1993, that being the lowest quotation
received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to use the Tender Units List, as recorded in Appendix
EX.7/93, to select additional equipment based on the next lowest tender if the need arises.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Quotations were invited from a total of 23 companies and a request for tenders was also placed in
the Daily Commercial News.
The rental of the construction equipment with operator is to be utilized by the Water Resource
Division in carrying out the 1993 work programs.
Our decision regarding the low quotation is based on our comparison of a list of equipment
commonly used in our work, which would give us the best package over the 1993 work period. A
total of 22 tenders were received and seven fully completed the equipment category list. Our
analysis of the seven quotations indicate that Sartor and Susin Limited is the lowest quotation
received.
In the event that Sartor and Susin Limited cannot supply all our equipment needs during the peak
construction periods, we feel it would be prudent to be able to use the list as recorded in Appendix
EX.7/93 to select equipment from the company which provides the next lowest tender price. This
will be dependant on what equipment is specified and will help ensure that equipment is always
available.
19. SIX MONTH REVIEW OF CAO
KEY ISSUE
The six month Performance Review of the CAO was conducted by William Granger as directed by
the Executive Committee. A confidential report was distributed to members at the Executive
Committee Meeting.
B55 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION 1I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
19. SIX MONTH REVIEW OF CAO
Res. #E51/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the CAO Six Month Review be approved as presented.
20. DECISION OF HEARING
KEY ISSUE
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
The Hearing Board, on the matter of Richard Pilarski, reported to the Executive Committee.
Res. #E52/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Kip Van Kempen
Patrick Abtan
CARRIED
THAT the application for a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, by Richard Pilarski, for
permission to construct a chain -link fence in the flood plain of Mimico Creek on Lot 6, Plan 718,
(257 Berry Road), in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed, be refused as it will affect the
control of flooding and increase risk to life and property.
21. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Res. #E53/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Kip Van Kempen
CARRIED
THAT permit applications listed herein as (a) to (h) inclusive, and added permit applications (i) to (k)
inclusive, be approved, in accordance to the information contained within the reports.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B56
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
21. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(a) Giuseppe and Dorina Palermo
To place fill within a regulated area, on Part West '/2 Lot 22, Concession 1 WHS,
(Southeast corner of Old School Road and McLaughlin Road), in the Town of Caledon,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by the applicant entitled "New Fill Bed Site - Detail A "; "Fill Bed Detail -
Section 1-1"; "House Grading Detail - Section 2 -2 "; and "House Grading Detail - Section 3-
3"; received on March 22, 1993.
(b} Bank of Montreal
To construct within the flood plain, on Part Lot 7, Concession 7, (145 Woodbridge
Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Kearns Mancini Architects Inc.; Project No. 9210; Drawing No. AO
dated December 15, 1992; Drawing No. ME -1 dated December 11, 1992.
(c) Ramp Developments Limited
To place fill within a regulated area, on Part Lot 6, Concession 8, (West side of Kipling
Ave., north of Highway #7 in Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by EMC Group Ltd.; Drawing No. 88170 -GR, revised February, 1993;
received February 26, 1993;
(2) Landscape Plans; prepared by Donald Macintosh Landscape Architects; Drawing No.s L.1
and L.2; revised June 5, 1990; received March 23, 1993.
(d) The Toronto Humber Yacht Club
To construct within a flood plain, on Part Lots 4 & 5, Range 3, Registered Plan 4863,
(Humber Valley Road, south of Kings Mill Park), in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; received on March 1, 1993.
B57 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
21. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(e) Mark & Neo Mandlsohn
To place fill within a fill regulated area, on Part Lot 35 & Part Lot 13, Registered Plan 5455,
(91 Post Road), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Survey /Site Plan; prepared by Project Consulting Group; Project No. 9232/MM; Sheet 1 of
2, Revision 1 dated March, 1993; received March 8, 1993;
(2) Section Thru Proposed Site & Structure; prepared by Project Consulting Group; Project No.
9232/MM; Sheet 2 of 2, Revision 1 dated March, 1993; received March 8, 1993.
(f) Canadian Pacific Limited
To develop two Tots within the Regional Storm flood plain previously used to provide train
cargo service to adjacent properties, (on Bertrand Road and Thermos Road), in the City of
Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan and Elevations; prepared by V.W. Kuchar & Associates, Architects Ltd.; Project
No. 5 -032; Drawing A -1, dated June 12, 1992; received June 24, 1992.
(n) Bramblewell Developments and Crombee Construction Ltd.
To pipe an intermittent watercourse, on Lots 16 to 21, Registered Plan 3460, (Lawson
Road and Brumwell Street), in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Lot Drainage and House Siting Control Plan; prepared by Cumming Cockburn Ltd.; Drawing
No. 5225 -103, dated October 14, 1992; received on March 1, 1993.
(h) Zanini Developments Inc.
To place fill within a regulated area, on 591 The Queensway, in the City of Etobicoke,
Mimico Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Wallman, Clewez, Bergman Architects Ltd.; Job No. 9212; Drawing
Number Al ; received April 1, 1993;
(2) Landscape Plans; prepared by Alexander Budrevics Associates Limited; Project No. 921-
582; Sheet No. L -1, L -2, L -3; received April 1, 1993;
(3) Plans; prepared by Anton Kikas Ltd.; Project 401E-92; Drawing Numbers 2 and 10;
received April 1, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993 B58
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
21. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(i) The Norfinch Group Inc.
To alter a watercourse and place fill within a regulated area, on Block 3, Registered Plan
43M -643, (Torbram Road and Walker Drive), in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Servicing Plan; prepared by Dermot J. Sweeny Architect Inc.; Drawing No. SS -1,
Revision 1 March 11, 1993; received March 11, 1993.
ID Highway 27 - Langstaff Holdings Inc.
To alter a watercourse and place fill within a fill regulated area, on Lots 12 & 13,
Concession 8, (Highway 27 and Langstaff Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by EMC Group Limited; Drawing No.s 91 105 -1 to 91105-3; 91 105 -3A;
91105 -P1 to 91105 -P8; 91105 -GR1; 91105 -GR2 and 86125 -ES1, dated October, 1991;
(2) Woodbridge Meadows Phase IIA, Vegetation & Environmental Analysis; prepared by
Landscape Planning Limited; dated October 8, 1992;
(3) Landscape Plan; prepared by Landscape Planning Limited; Project number 92:39, Drawing
No. L.3; dated March 25, 1993.
(k) Mr. & Mrs. M.E. Krapez •
To place fill within a regulated area and construct within a flood plain, on Part Lot 9,
Concession 7,
Part 1, Plan 65R- 10407, (240 Clarence Street - Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan,
Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by City & Country Design Build; Drawing Numbers Al, A2 & A3, dated
March 1, 1993; received March 26, 1993;
(2) Plans; prepared by Maitland Spencer Engineering Ltd.; Project No. 193 -005; Drawing
Numbers Si and S2, dated March 24, 1993; received March 26, 1993.
B59 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/93, APRIL 2, 1993
SECTION IV - FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD
22. INTERIM REPORTING RELATIONSHIPS FOR PROGRAM SERVICES STAFF
Res. #E54/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Patrick Abtan
THAT the Chief Administrative Officer's report, dated March 25, 1993, on interim reporting
relationships for Program Services staff be received for information.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Meeting #1 /93 of the Executive Committee, held March 12, 1993, Craig Mather indicated that
he would be advising the Executive Committee of the short term organizational structure for
Program Services staff in Tight of Tom Barber's retirement, which is effective May 1, 1993. In this
regard, effective April 5, 1993, the Planning and Development Group, which is responsible for
planning and development matters related to the Conservation Areas, Field Centres and the Greater
Toronto Trails Project, will report to Jim Agnew, Director, Field Operations Division. The
Community Relations Group, which is responsible for the communications and marketing program
of the Authority, will be reporting to Alyson Deans, Manager, Corporate Planning and Analysis.
The COA will be working with staff and the Executive Committee over the next few months to
develop a long term organizational structure.
NEW BUSINESS
It was confirmed that there will be a meeting of the Evaluation and Review Sub - Committee on
Friday, April 16, 1993, from 12:00 noon to 2:00 p.m. in the Theatre at Black Creek Pioneer
Village. •
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:00 noon, April 2, 1993.
William B. Granger J. Craig Mather
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
/bb.
MAY 7, 1993
Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
y
minutes
B60
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #3/93
The Executive Committee met at the Authority office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday,
May 7, 1993. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
MINUTES
Res. #E55(93
Chair William Granger
Members Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
Paul Palleschi
Jim Witty
Vice Chair
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #2/93 be approved.
CORRESPONDENCE
Lois Hancey
Lorna Jackson
Richard O'Brien
Jim Witty
Goods and Services Tax in Respect of the Purchase of Former Canada Post Property
Res. #E56/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Paul Palleschi
Lois Griffin
CARRIED
THAT the correspondence from The Honourable Donald F. Mazankowski, Minister of Finance, dated
April 8, 1993, and from Pierre GraveII, Q.C., Deputy Minister, Revenue Canada, dated April 13,
1993, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT all Federal Members of Parliament within the Authorities jurisdiction be
informed of this matter and seek their assistance in obtaining relief from the G.S.T. on the purchase
of the former Canada Post Property.
CARRIED
B61 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
CORRESPONDENCE (CONTD.)
CONSERVATION LAND TAX REBATE PROGRAM
Res. #E57/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Jim Witty
THAT the two items of correspondence from Charles Caccia, M.P., addressed to Alan Tonks, Metro
Chair, and to The Honourable Bob Rae, both dated May 4, 1993, be received;
THAT the Chair of the Authority be requested to write the Premier of the Province of Ontario
expressing our concern over the cancellation of the Conservation Land Tax Rebate Program;
AND FURTHER THAT Chair Tonks also be requested to express his concerns to the Premier and the
Minister of Natural Resources over the inequity of the size of the budget cuts required of The
Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the cancellation of the Conservation
Land Tax Rebate Program.
CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION
COMPONENT
- Zanini Developments Inc., Mimico Creek Watershed
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located south of The Queensway, west of Park Lawn Road under "Land
Acquisition Project - 1987 - 1991" - Flood Plain and Conservation Component - Mimico Creek
Watershed.
Res. #E58/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Paul Palleschi
Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.226 acres, more or Tess, be purchased from
Zanini Developments Inc., said land being an irregular shaped parcel of land being Part of Lots 49
and 50, Registered Plan M -137, City of Etobicoke, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, located
south of The Queensway, west of Park Lawn Road;
THAT the purchase price is to be the nominal consideration of $2.00, plus Vendor's legal costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements and any future easements required to service the adjacent lands owned
by Zanini Developments Inc.;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B62
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION
COMPONENT (CONTD.)
- Zanini Developments Inc.Mimico Creek Watershed
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #51, Authority Meeting #3, May 2, 1986 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with representatives of Zanini Developments Inc.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
A map showing the general location of the property and a plan illustrating the specific location was
available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved Master Plan for Acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The funding of this purchase will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502 - Flood Control Hazard
Account.
2. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT: 1987 - 1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND
CONSERVATION COMPONENT
-Rouge River Watershed, Carmela D'Alessandro
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of a permanent easement and restrictive covenant located west of Leslie Street, north of
Nineteenth Avenue, in the Town of Richmond Hill under "Land Acquisition Project 1987 - 1991 -
Flood Plain and Conservation Component - Rouge River Watershed ".
Res. #E59/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Paul Palleschi
Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a permanent easement and restrictive
covenant on 2.1 acres, more or less, together with a 10 foot wide access right -of -way be
purchased from Carmela D'Alessandro, said lands being irregular shaped parcels being Part of Lot
32, Concession 2, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, situate west of Leslie
Street, north of Nineteenth Avenue;
B63 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993'
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT: 1987 - 1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND
CONSERVATION COMPONENT (CONTD.)
-Rouge River Watershed, Carmela D'Alessandro
THAT the purchase price be the sum of $2.00, plus Vendor's legal costs;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #51, Authority Meeting #3, May 2, 1986, approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with Jim Kirk of Malone Given Parson, representatives of the
owner.
The Director of Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with the
purchase of this permanent easement and restrictive covenant.
A map showing the general location of the property and a plan illustrating the specific location was
available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The funding of this purchase will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502 - Flood Control Hazard
Account.
3. CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF PICKERING
- Request for a permanent easement for a storm water quality facility,
south of the Third Concession Road, west of Brock Road
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from the Corporation of the Town of Pickering to provide a permanent
easement for a storm water quality facility, located south of the Third Concession Road, west of
Brock Road.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B64 '
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF PICKERING (CONTD.)
- Request for a permanent easement for a storm water quality facility,
south of the Third Concession Road, west of Brock Road
Res. #E60/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request
from the Corporation of the Town of Pickering to provide a permanent easement for a storm water
quality facility, located south of the Third Concession Road, west of Brock Road;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co- operate
with the Corporation of the Town of Pickering in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.295 hectares, more or less, (0.729 acres) be granted to
the Corporation of the Town of Pickering for a storm water quality facility, said land being Part of
Lot 19, Concession 2, Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, designated as parts 1,
2 & 3 on a Plan of Survey prepared by Otto Ertl, Ontario Land Surveyor under his Project No. 92-
83;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Corporation of the Town of Pickering has conveyed lands to the Authority over the years for
the nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that this easement be granted for the
nominal consideration of $2.00. The Corporation of the Town of Pickering has agreed to assume
all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing the transaction.
The subject lands were acquired from Trimbats Lane Ltd. in January, 1989, under the Duffins
Creek Flood Plain Lands component of the Land Acquisition Project. The principals of the former
owners of this property are the proponents of the new development which will utilize this facility.
A map showing the general location of the property and a plan illustrating the specific location was
available at the meeting.
B65 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO
- Request for a permanent easement for monitoring wells south of Finch Avenue,
east of Meadowvale Road, City of Scarborough
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto to provide a permanent
easement for monitoring wells, located south of Finch Avenue, east of Meadowvale Road, City of
Scarborough.
Res. #E61/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
Brian Harrison
Lois Griffin
WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request
from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto to provide a permanent easement for monitoring
wells, south of Finch Avenue, east of Meadowvale Road, City of Scarborough;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co- operate
with The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.122 hectares, more or less, (0.302 acres) be granted to
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for monitoring wells, said lands being Part of Lot 2,
Concession 3, City of Scarborough, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, designated as Parts 1
and 2 on Plan of Survey prepared by The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Works Department
under their Plan No. P.1622 -11;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto has conveyed lands to the Authority over the years for
the nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that this easement be granted for the
nominal consideration of $2.00. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto has agreed to assume all
legal, survey and other costs involved in completing the transaction.
The subject lands were acquired from Canadian National Railway Co. in March, 1969, under the
Rouge River Flood Plain Lands Component of the Land Acquisition Project.
A map showing the general location of the property and a plan illustrating the specific location was
available at the meeting.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B66
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. 1993 ACAO BIENNIAL TOUR
- September 12 -15, 1993
KEY ISSUE
Attendance at the 1993 ACAO Biennial Tour, September 12 to 15, 1993, Meadowvale, Ontario.
Res. #E62/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT William B. Granger, Chair of the Authority;
Marie Muir, Richard O'Brien and Donna Patterson, members of the Authority; and J. Craig Mather,
Chief Administrative Officer, be authorized to attend the Association of Conservation Authorities of
Ontario 1993 Biennial Tour, September 12 to 15, 1993, in Meadowvale, Ontario, and that their
expenses in this connection be paid.
BACKGROUND
CARRIED
The 1993 ACAO Biennial Tour is being co- hosted by The Metropolitan Toronto and Region and
Credit Valley Conservation Authorities at the Delta Meadowvale Inn, Sunday, September 12
through Wednesday, September 15, 1993. At Authority Meeting #5/92, held June 26, 1992, by
Res. #75, William B. Granger, Marie Muir, Richard O'Brien and Donna Patterson were appointed to
represent the Authority on the Biennial Tour Planning Committee. J. Craig Mather, Chief
Administrative Officer, has also served on the Planning Committee.
Registrations are now being accepted for the Tour and authorization is required to permit the
Authority members on the Planning Committee and the Chief Administrative Officer to attend the
Tour and to have their related expenses paid.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The total registration cost for the members is $920 and funding is available in account
No. 001 -03 -352.
6. THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO
-Re- appointment of Robert S. Gillespie
KEY ISSUE
The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto appoints members for a three year term.
Res. #E63/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Paul Palleschi
Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the membership of Robert S. Gillespie be
renewed for a further three -year term, April 1, 1993 to April 1, 1996.
CARRIED
B67 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO
-Re- appointment of Robert S. Gillespie
BACKGROUND
"...UPON MOTION duly made by Mr. J. A. McGinnis and seconded by Mr. J. W. Keenan, IT WAS
UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED THAT the membership of Mr. R. S. Gillespie be renewed for a further
three -year term - April 1, 1993 to April 1, 1996 - subject to the necessary approval of the
Conservation Authority..."
This recommendation was approved by the board of The Conservation Foundation of Greater
Toronto on Tuesday, March 9, 1993. Approval is now being requested to comply with the
guidelines set out in the Conservation Foundation's Charter and By -Laws.
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. WILD WATER KINGDOM
-Lease Administration
KEY ISSUE
This report responds to the request by Wild Water Kingdom that all rent payable to the Authority in
1993 be payable September 30th, 1993.
Res. #E64/93
Moved by:
Seconded by;
Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
THAT in 1993 the Schedule for the lease revenues payable to the Authority as provided for in the
lease agreement between the Authority and Wild Water Kingdom be amended such that in 1993
only, payment of all rent due in 1993 shall be payable on or before September 30th, 1993;
AND FURTHER THAT staff in conjunction with the Authority's solicitors, be authorized and directed
to develop a suitable agreement to implement the rescheduling in a manner which protects fully the
Authority's interests.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B68
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 -1994
- Colonel Samuel Smith Park, Consultant Selection
KEY ISSUE
To retain the services of consultants to complete the final design and tender documents for the
public boardwalk and bridge structure at Colonel Samuel Smith Park, City of Etobicoke.
Res. #E65/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Paul Palleschi
Lois Griffin
THAT the proposal for final design of the public boardwalk and bridge structure for Colonel Samuel
Smith Park from Hans Sustronk and Associates Limited be accepted at the upset limit of $47,850.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park is being developed under the Lake Ontario Waterfront
Regeneration Project 1992 -1994. The proposed public boardwalk, which will function as a portion
of the Greater Toronto Waterfront Trail, is to be located along the north shore of the boat basin
within the park.
The MTRCA has completed the installation of a settling basin and weir structure to restrict storm
sewer discharge into the boat basin. The weir structure was designed and constructed to support
a foot /service vehicle bridge that will connect the public boardwalk with the waterfront trail. As
well, the MTRCA has completed the installation of watermain, sanitary forcemain and high voltage
cable on the site. These services are presently being used by Lakeshore Yacht Club and will be
used by the Humber College Sailing School in 1993.
RATIONALE
Five proposals for the public boardwalk and bridge structure design were received as follows:
Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd. $31,600.
Hans Sustronk and Associates Ltd. 47,850.
Hotson Bakker Architects 49,000.
Daniel Benson Architects 52,450.
Ferris Quinn Associates Inc. 52,500.
All proposal costs did not include the Goods and Services Tax. In addition, the proposals from
Hotson Bakker Architects, Daniel Benson Architect and Ferris and Quinn Associates Inc., did not
include a total cost for disbursements. As well, the Hotson Bakker Architects proposal identified a
consulting fee range with the upset limit being $49,000. based on their estimate of 7% on overall
construction cost.
B69 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 -1994 (CONTD.)
- Colonel Samuel Smith Park, Consultant Selection
Following an in depth review and evaluation of all the proposals with The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department, it is recommended that the proposal from
Hans Sustronk and Associates Limited be accepted. The Hans Sustronk and Associates Limited
proposal ranked highest in the evaluation of project methodology, staff and sub - consultant
commitments and scheduling. For this project Hans Sustronk and Associates Limited has
associated itself with the landscape architectural firm of Moore /George Associates Inc. Together,
these two firms demonstrated an important sensitivity and a ‹oerience level in their proposal to
appropriately integrate a public bridge and boardwalk adjace to the boat clubs in accordance with
the design guidelines for the park. In addition, both firms have an extensive understanding of the
site and surrounding environs. Hans Sustronk and Associates Limited. was involved in the Colonel
S, =nuel Smith Park Master Plan development as well as the design of site services for the park.
The firm of Moore /George Associates Inc. recently completed the Environmental Management
Master Plan of the former Lakeshore Psychiatric Hospital grounds for the Ministry of Government
Services /Humber College. This proposal has estimated a reasonable fee in accordance with the
amount of consulting and design work which would be required to successfully complete this
project.
Although the Marshall Macklin Monaghan proposal estimated the lowest consulting fees, staff
analysis is that the level of effort would be too limited by the budget and that there would be
insufficient time allowed in the design development stage of this project to adequately recognize
and incorporate the Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park Design Guidelines. These guidelines
were made available to all the consultants submitting proposals. Staff is also concerned that the
budget will not allow for comments from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, the City of
Etobicoke, the boat clubs and the waterfront community groups to be appropriately analyzed and
incorporated into the design.
Therefore, staff recommend acceptance of the Hans Sustronk and Associated Limited. proposal.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Final design drawings will be completed by the consultants for the public boardwalk and bridge
structure components. The overall design will incorporate a bridge, boardwalk with appropriate
surface treatments that extends along 240 metres of shoreline, seating, screening, plant material,
and a plaza area with a lookout structure.
The consultants will use the Design Guidelines developed by the Authority to guide them through
their design development. The detail design work will require consultation with The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto, Parks and Property Department; City of Etobicoke, Parks and Planning
Departments; the Colonel Samuel Smith Boating Federation and public interest groups.
Finally, the consultants will prepare contract documents and drawings for tendering and will
oversee the installation of the project.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B70
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 -1994 (CONTD.)
- Colonel Samuel Smith Park, Consultant Selection
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are budgeted in the Lake Ontario Waterfront Regeneration Project 1992 -1994 under Account
No. 204 -07. These funds include the $200,000 contribution by the Province of Ontario on March
26, 1993 as part of the $9.5 million Jobs Ontario restoration of the former Lakeshore Psychiatric
Hospital.
9. 1993 WATERFRONT MONITORING PROGRAM
- Tender Opening Sub - Committee #3/93, Lab Analytical Services
KEY ISSUE
At Meeting Tender Opening Sub - Committee #3/93, tenders were opened for the lab analytical
service contract required for the 1993 Waterfront Monitoring Program. The tenders received were
referred to staff for review and a report (Appendix T0.7193).
Res. #E66/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Paul Palleschi
Lois Griffin
THAT the firm of BAS Laboratories Ltd. be retained for lab analytical services required for the 1993
Waterfront Monitoring Program at an upset limit of $48,459.23.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Since 1975, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (MTRCA) has conducted
environmental monitoring programs to describe biological, physical and chemical conditions in the
vicinity of waterfront parks. Special studies have been conducted to examine the sediment quality,
water quality, sediment deposition rates, bottom substrate documentation, biomonitoring surveys
using freshwater clams, and currents associated with waterfront parks. The 1993 Program
includes analyses forming part of the environmental studies in the Col. Sam Smith Waterfront Park.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Quotations were solicited and received from the following laboratories:
BAS Laboratories Ltd.
Enviroclean Ltd.
Entech (Agri- Service Lab)
Ortech Lab
Barringer Lab
Environment Protection Lab
Walker Lab
48,459.23
51,160.45
51,921.75
60,727.85
67,322.26
95,356.00
No bid
Funds are available under various waterfront accounts, including 240 -01, 601 -70.
B71 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
SECTION 1I - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. REPORT #2/93 OF THE RECOGNITION /EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AWARD
SUB - COMMITTEE
KEY ISSUE
Meeting #2/93 of the Recognition /Employee Suggestion Award Sub - Committee was held on
March 26, 1993 to consider six employee suggestions.
MOTION TO DEFER
Res. #E67/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Recognition /Employee Suggestion Award be deferred, sine die;
11. DON WATERSHED STRATEGY
- Approval of Don Watershed Strategy Document Writer
KEY ISSUE
Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
CARRIED
To engage Pat Ohlendorf- Moffat to write the draft Don Watershed Strategy document on behalf of
the Don Watershed Task Force.
Res. #E68/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Paul Palleschi
Lois Griffin
THAT Pat Ohlendorf- Moffat, be retained to write the draft Don Watershed Strategy on behalf of the
Don Watershed Task Force, at a total cost not to exceed $25,000, including GST, based on the
provision of a 100 page document, and subject to the availability of funding.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Following Meeting #5/93 of the Don Watershed Task Force a small committee, consisting of Mark
Wilson, Task Force Chair; Councillor Doreen Quirk; and staff of the Authority, was struck to
develop a terms of reference for the development of the initial Vision and Principles section of the
draft Strategy document. Terms of reference were provided tc 'ur candidates. Three writers
provided letters of interest and attended interviews: Pat Ohler, ' . f- Moffat; Mary Rowe; Ann
Silversides.
All candidates were advised that this was an initial contract; that there was potential for additional
work; and the scope of that work.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B72
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. DON WATERSHED STRATEGY (CONTD.)
- Approval of Don Watershed Strategy Document Writer
Pat Ohlendorf- Moffat was chosen to assist the Task Force in the initial stage of developing a draft
Vision and Principles section of the document. Ms. Ohlendorf- Moffat was the lowest bidder, had
the most familiarity with the Don Watershed, and was willing to work closely with the Task Force.
The Task Force was pleased with the initial work undertaken by Ms. Ohlendorf- Moffat. The draft
Vision was included in the Task Force's second report to the Authority received by the Authority at
meeting #3/93 held on April 23, 1993.
At Don Watershed Task Force Meeting #6/93 it was resolved by Res #21, That a writer be
retained to assist in the preparation of the remainder of the Strategy document."
RATIONALE
Staff propose that the services of Ms. Pat Ohlendorf- Moffat be retained to complete the draft
Strategy document. The members of the Don Watershed Task Force have been clear in their desire
to create a compelling, succinct document which can be easily understood by all residents of the
watershed.
A formal request for proposal for the second stage of work has not been undertaken. Ms.
Ohlendorf- Moffat is recommended, based on:
• competition carried out for the Vision and Principles sections;
• familiarity of the writer with the subject;
• desirability to maintain a consistent style throughout the document; and
• availability to meet the Task Force's extremely tight schedule to complete the
document by January, 1994.
The terms of reference include specifically:
• research and interviews to develop a technically accurate background chapter;
• development of the strategies section based on the technical information provided
by Authority staff and three Task Force working committees;
• editing of seven subwatershed /corridor management summaries to be prepared by
external consultants and Authority staff;
• development of a final Strategy summary;
• identification of graphic requirements;
• advice on final layout; and
• revisions based on Task Force comments, agency and public consultation during
1993.
At this time, the Authority does not have a writer on staff.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for services are available in the Don Watershed account #1 18 -10, subject to finalization of
provincial funding in 1993.
B73 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
12. CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL, VAUGHAN
- Referral to Ontario Municipal Board
KEY ISSUE
An Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing has been scheduled for June 14, 1993 in the matter of
a referral by Marbloom Investments Ltd. and Wilderton Investments Ltd. to settle and determine
terms and conditions of a site plan for the development of lands comprising of Lots 28 and 29,
Concession 8 in the City of Vaughan to permit a 27 -hole golf course (Crooked Creek Golf Course).
which affects, in part, the valley lands of the East Branch of the Humber River. Staff is seeking
direction to object to and to prepare for this hearing.
Res. #E69/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Paul Palleschi
Lois Griffin
THAT staff prepare to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing scheduled for June 14, 1993
objecting to the current development applications for the construction of a 27 -hole golf course on
Lots 28 & 29, Concession 8, City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed;
THAT the firm of Gardiner, Roberts be retained to represent the Authority at the hearing;
THAT a joint case and legal counsel among the Authority, the City of Vaughan and the Ministry of
Natural Resources be pursued;
THAT staff continue to discuss revisions to the current development applications with the
proponents, the City of Vaughan and the Ministry of Natural Resources in an attempt to resolve
outstanding issues prior to the OMB hearing;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report to the Executive Committee at Meeting #4/93, June 11, 1993 on
the status of discussions and the direction to be taken at the OMB hearing on June 14/93.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The proponents for this development filed a zoning amendment and site development application
with the City of Vaughan on October 19, 1990 to permit the construction of a 27 hole golf course
on the subject lands. Pursuant to Section 34(1 1) and Section 40(12) of the Planning Act, the
proponents appealed the refusal of the City of Vaughan to consider their applications within 30
days as prescribed in the Act. Both a rezoning and development application were filed. The flood
plain lands are currently zoned OSI which allows for golf course use. The balance of the valley
lands and tablelands are zoned agricultural and are proposed to be zoned OSI.
The applications were subsequently considered at the City of Vaughan Council Public Hearing of
December 7, 1992 at which time Council directed the applicant to redesign the proposal so that it
is acceptable to staff from the Ministry of Natural Resources and the MTRCA, and that a report be
brought back to the Committee of the Whole with respect to potential design solutions for the site.
Vaughan staff will be reporting to Council, at which time a decision regarding these applications
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B74 •
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
12. CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL, VAUGHAN (CONTD.)
- Referral to Ontario Municipal Board
will be made; however, their report may not be considered until late May or early June, just prior to
the OMB hearing date. This generates some uncertainty with the June 14 OMB hearing as related
to Vaughan Council's position. Authority staff require direction to proceed and to prepare in the
event that the hearing does take place. At this point in time, Vaughan staff and MNR staff do not
support the application.
In Tight of the above, and dependant on the outcome of the Public Hearing, the Authority and MNR
may be seeking party status with the City of Vaughan, or providing support to them, at the Ontario
Municipal Board Hearing on this matter. Both agencies have expressed interest in preparing a joint
case and retaining joint legal counsel.
MTRCA PROGRAM ISSUES
Authority staff has undertaken a review of the latest re- design and are currently in the process of
finalizing their comments to the City of Vaughan. Staff is of the opinion that it represents
significant and unacceptable modifications to the existing valley feature and functions, and that
although detailed design has not been provided, the extensive disturbance proposed would not
comply with the Authority's Regulation Administration Guidelines and would result in a staff
recommendation to refuse any application based on this latest proposal to the Authority's
Executive Committee. Staff's opinion is based on the following:
The area is a very well defined valley of the East Humber River with steep slopes and 2 small
tributary streams with incised ravines. The valleylands are predominantly forested with continuous
woody riparian cover. In several locations, the watercourse is coincident with steep eroding banks.
The habitats extend off -site, up and downstream, within this reach of valley corridor.
Authority staff have previously reviewed an Environmental Evaluation prepared by Michalski
Associates which accurately describes the existing conditions of the site as observed by staff
during site visits.
While this area was not evaluated during the MTRCA's 1982 Environmentally Significant Area
Study, it is currently being updated beginning with a review and revision of the Authority's criteria
used to designate ESA's. Based on the information and documentation provided in the Michalski
report and site visits made by staff, it is very likely that the forested valley lands would meet ESA
designation criteria based on both current and proposed criteria; however, the exact boundary of
the ESA has not been delineated at this time.
Authority staff are of the opinion that the existing undisturbed valley of the East Humber River on
the subject property is fulfilling appropriate natural functions in accordance with the goals and
objectives of the Watershed Plan and Greenspace Strategy. These include conveyance of base
flow, water quality regulation, terrestrial and aquatic habitat and corridors, and the storage and
conveyance of floodwater.
This re- designed concept includes 8 holes within the valley of the East Humber River, 3 of which
are located on a lower meadow area. These holes are all part of the proposed full length 18 hole
course. This proposal will require significant disturbance and alteration to existing valley features
and functions, such as:
B75 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
12. CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL, VAUGHAN (CONTD.)
- Referral to Ontario Municipal Board
- 2 crossings of the East Humber River.
- the potential need for erosion control works to protect
tees, greens and fairways in as many as five areas.
- loss of approximately 100 metres of riparian cover
adjacent to the river.
- loss of 35% of the total forest cover, including • he
removal of vegetation on steep slopes adjacent to the
watercourse.
- loss of 25% of the total area of significant forest
stands.
- nine locations where tee or green construction will
require modifications to the existing valley landform
(regrading of steep valley slopes).
- encroachment of development within the 10 metre setback
requirement from the stable top -of -bank.
CURRENT STATUS
Staff of the City of Vaughan, MNR and the Authority have identified that a revision to contain the
golf course proposal, with some modifications, to the west side of the Humber River valley may
resolve all outstanding public agency concerns. A meeting to discuss this proposal with the
proponent is scheduled for May 13, 1993.
13. VOLUNTARY EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE
KEY ISSUE
Authorization to develop a voluntary early retirement incentive package for full -time employees of
the Authority.
Res. #E70/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lois Griffin
THAT staff be directed to develop a Voluntary Early Retirement Incentive package for eligible full -
time employees of the Authority and report to the Finance and Administration Advisory Board at
the earliest opportunity.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Attrition through voluntary early retirement incentives is one option that could assist the Authority
in reducing 1994 payroll obligations. We will explore the feasibility of various options and report
back through the Finance and Administration Advisory Board with a detailed proposal.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B76
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Res. #E71/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lois Griffin
THAT the permit application from the City of Mississauga, Transportation & Works Department,
Agenda Item 13 (s), to place fill within a regulated area, construct within a flood plain and alter a
waterway, on Part Lot 2, Concessions 4 and 5, (Matheson Boulevard extension - Creekbank Road
to Explorer Drive), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed be approved in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Delcan Corporation; Project No. 92109, Sheet G3, Plan No. C- 28886,
dated March, 1992, revised and received May 4, 1993; Sheet G1, Plan No. C- 28884;
Sheet G2, Plan No. C- 28885, revised and received May 4, 1993; Sheet S1, Plan No. C-
28887; Sheet S2, Plan No. C- 28888; Sheet S3, Plan No. C- 28889; Sheet S4, Plan No. C-
28890; Sheet S5, Plan No. C- 28891; Sheet S6, Plan No. C- 28892; Sheet S7, Plan No. C-
28893; Sheet S8, Plan No. C- 28894; Sheet S18, Plan No. C -28904 dated October, 1992;
Sheet 6, Plan No. C- 28874, dated March, 1993; revised and received April 5, 1993.
(2) Landscape Plan; prepared by Delcan Corporation; Project No. 012416; Plan No. 1001/92;
revised April 30, 1993 and received May 4, 1993.
AMENDMENT Moved by: Richard O'Brien
Res. #E72/93 Seconded by: Lois Griffin
THAT staff report back to Executive Committee Meeting #9/93, November 12, 1993, regarding the
progress of the approved works.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
Res. #E73/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Paul Palleschi
THAT the permit applications listed herein as (a) to (q) inclusive, with the exception of (o), and
added permit applications (r) to (u) inclusive, with the exception of (s), be approved, in accordance
to the information contained within the reports.
CARRIED
B77 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(a) Bramelea Limited
To place fill within a regulated area and alter a waterway, on Part Lot 11,
Concession 4 EHS, (Northeast corner of Dixie Road and Bovaird Drive), in the City
of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Johnson, Sustronk, Weinstein and Associates; Project No. 87 -29A;
drawing Numbers RG -1, RG -2, RG -3, RG -4, RG -6 and RG -7 dated June, 1992; RG -5 dated
February, 1993; RGD -1 dated March, 1993; received April 23, 1993.
(b) East Woodbridge Development Limited
To alter a watercourse, on Lots 24 & 25, Concession 9, (south side of Nashville
Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Stormwater Detention Pond Design Details; prepared by EMC Group Limited; Drawing
Number 84111-9, dated August, 1991; received April 14, 1993;
(2) Filled Noise Barrier Cross- sections; prepared by EMC Group Limited; Drawing Number
84111-10, dated May, 1985.
(3) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan; prepared by EMC Group Limited; Drawing Number
84111-16, dated March, 1993; received March 25, 1993.
(c) Mr. G. Lombardi
To construct within the flood plain, on Part Lot 11, Registered Plan M-1115, (3
Birch Hill Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site /Grading Plan; prepared by New Design Homes; Project 240 -93; Drawing Number 93-
03; dated revised April 19, 1993;
(2) Cross - Section /Retaining Wall; prepared by New Design Homes; Project 240 -93; Drawing
Number 93 -03; dated revised April 19, 1993.
(d) The City of Vaughan - Department of Recreation and Culture
To place fill within a regulated area, on Part Lot 34, Concession 1 WYS, (46
Uplands Avenue - Thornhill), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Uplands Trail Layout Plan; prepared by MTRCA; Sheet 1 dated April, 1993; received on
April 28, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B78
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(e) Metropolitan Toronto Parks & Property Department and Metropolitan Toronto Housing
Authority
To place fill material within a regulated area, east of Scarlett Road and south of
Lawrence Avenue in Weston, in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Proctor & Redfern Ltd.; Project No. OH- FP6/58; Job No. 93 -675;
Drawing No.s L1, L2, L3 and L4; dated and received April 2, 1993.
(f) Mr. Richard Filarski
To construct a structure, on Part Lot 6, Registered Plan 718, (257 Berry Road), in
the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan drawing; prepared by applicant; dated revised April 6, 1993.
(q) The City of North York, Public Works Department
To alter a watercourse, on Part Lot 19, Concession 2 EYS, (Sumner Heights Drive),
in the City of North York, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Storm Outfall at Sumner Heights Drive; Drawing No. ST -8, dated January, 1993; prepared
by City of North York, Department of Public Works; received March 13, 1993;
(2) Storm Sewer Outfall Rehabilitation; Sheets 1 - 5, dated October, 1992; prepared by City of •
North York, Department of Public Works; Project 91409.00, received February 1, 1993.
(h) 983784 Ontario Limited
To construct within the flood plain, on Part Lot 10, Concession 5 WYS, (61 Beverly
Hills Drive), in the City of North York, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by A. Baldassarra Architect Inc.; Project No. 91 -16; Drawing No. A -1 .0,
dated September 29, 1992; received March 16, 1993;
(2) Site Servicing and Grading Plan; prepared by Ander Engineering Limited; Drawing No. 92-
109 -1; Sheet 1 of 1 dated February, 1993; received March 16, 1993.
B79 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(1) Mr. Marvin Hertzman
To construct within the flood plain, on Part Lots 3 & 4, Registered Plan 2773, (6 St.
Margarets Drive), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Proposed Renovations and Additions Plans; prepared by F. Brennan; Drawing Numbers A1-
A8, dated March, 1993; received March 15, 1993.
(1) William and Meredith Saunderson
To place mulch and regrade to build a pathway, on Lot 49, Registered Plan M -275,
(140 Riverview Drive), in the City of Toronto, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Landscape Plans for 140 Riverview Drive; prepared by Landscape Architects; Plan L -1;
Project No. 19925; received March 29, 1993.
(k) City of Scarborough
To regrade in order to construct an addition, on Part Block F, Registered Plan 5645,
(1299 Ellesmere Road, at Brimley Road), in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Shore Tilbe Irwin & Partners; Project No. 9230; Drawing Al;
received April 21, 1993.
(1) Jordon Enterprises Inc.
To reconstruct an entrance roadway and construct a storm sewer outfall, on Part
Lot 23, Concession 3, (1940 McCowan Road, north of Sheppard), in the City of
Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Grading Plans; prepared by R.V. Anderson; Job No. 3145; Sheet No. Si; received
April 6, 1993;
(2) Storm Sewer Outfall Plan; prepared by R.V. Anderson and Associates; Drawing
No. 3145.01; received April 6, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B80
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(m) Lincoln Homes
To place a temporary sales trailer, on Part Lot 17, Concession 1, (southeast corner
of Notion Road and Highway 2), in the Town of Ajax, Duffin Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site and Elevation Plan; prepared by Lincoln Homes; Sheets No. 1 -4 inclusive;
received March 10, 1993.
(n) William T. Holland
To place fill within a regulated area and construct within a flood plain, on Lots 32 &
33, Registered Plan 3464, (14 Knightswood Road - Hoggs Hollow), in the City of
North York, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Lincoln Stevens Construction & Design Ltd.; Site Plan as shown on
Survey; prepared by William J. Plaxton Ltd.; received May 5, 1993;
(2) Elevation Plans; prepared by Lincoln Stevens Construction & Design Ltd.; Job No. 9306;
Drawing Numbers 6, 7, 8 & 9; received April 19, 1993; revised May 5, 1993;
(3) Structural Analysis Report; prepared by Onen & Seckin Limited, Consulting Engineers;
Project No. P -2471, dated April 23, 1993; received May 5, 1993;
(4) Plans; prepared by G.M. Sernas & Assoc. Ltd.; Project 93036; Drawing Numbers DET -1,
DET -2; received May 5, 1993.
(o) Chris & Dianna Karrandias
To construct within a flood plain, on Lot 2, Registered Plan 4064, (15 Allan Park
Road), in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
Withdrawn. Information requested has not been received.
(p) The Metropolitan Toronto Works Department
To place fill within a regulated area, on Part Lot 2, Concession 2, (east side of
Dufferin Street, between Steeles Avenue and Centre Street), in the City of
Vaughan, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto - Works Department; Contract
No. WS -1 -93; Drawing Numbers 271M-2 and 271M-3, dated November, 1993; revised and
received May 5, 1993.
B81 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(a) Metrus Management
To alter a waterway, on Part Lot 12, Concession 4 EHS, (west side of Bramalea
Road, north of Bovaird Drive), in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Sandringham Phase 2 Temporary Woodlot Weir; prepared by Fred Schaeffer and Associates
Ltd.; Project 92 -E -1484; Drawing No. 1; received April 30, 1993;
(2) Sandringham Phase 2 Details; prepared by Fred Schaeffer and Associates Ltd.; Project 92-
E -1484; Drawing No. 2; received April 30, 1993.
(r) Mr. N. Wood- Gaines
To construct a structure, on Part Lots 30, 31, 164 and Block 1, Registered Plan Bol-
7, (132 King Street E.), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; Part of survey prepared by Brown, Cavell and Associates; dated recieved by
MTRCA April 26, 1993;
(2) Site Plan; prepared by applicant; dated received by MTRCA April 26, 1993.
(t) Wyldewyn Village Inc.
To place fill in a fill regulated area and the flood plain to accommodate the
construction of a residential condominium, on Part Lots 10, 11, 12, Registered Plan
R 260, (75 Weldrick Road East), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Wyldwyn Village, Weldrick and Church Street Development Site Servicing and Grading plan;
prepared by Urban Ecosystems Ltd.; Project #93059; Drawing #SP -1, revision March 10,
1993; received March 30, 1993;
(2) Wyldwyn Village, Weldrick and Church Street Development Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan; prepared by G.M. Sernas & Associates Ltd.; Project #92045.420; Drawing SWM -1,
First Submission March 11, 1993; received March 30, 1993.
(u) Mary & Gary Scattergood
To place fill within a regulated area, on Part Lots 48, 49, 50, 51 & 52, Registered Plan 9,
(southside of Nashville Road, east of Highway 27 - Kleinburg), in the City of Vaughan,
Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site and Grading Plan; prepared by Guido Papa Surveying Ltd.; Drawing No. 93-
101; Dated Revised May 3, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 682
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. CLOSED SESSION
Res. #E74/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Executive move to closed session.
The Committee rose from closed session.
16. MILEAGE AND PER DIEM PAYMENTS TO AUTHORITY MEMBERS
Res. #E75/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Paul Palleschi
Lois Griffin
Paul Palleschi
CARRIED
THAT the Chair of the Authority, on behalf of the Executive Committee, inform all Authority
members of the options they have with respect to declining their mileage and per diem payment for
Authority and Advisory Board meetings.
Brian Harrison requested that the motion be split and that a recorded vote be taken on each part.
PART A
THAT the Executive Committee request the Chair of the Authority to inform members of the option
they have to decline mileage payment for Authority and Advisory Board meetings.
ON A RECORDED VOTE YEA NAY
Lois Griffin Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
Paul Palleschi
Jim Witty
William Granger
PART B
THAT the Executive Committee request the Chair of the Authority to inform members of the option
they have to decline per diem payment for Authority and Advisory Board meetings.
ON A RECORDED VOTE YEA NAY
Lois Griffin Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien Jim Witty
Paul Palleschi
William Granger
THE MOTION WAS CARRIED
B83 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
SECTION III - ITEM FOR REFERRAL TO ANOTHER BOARD
17. IMPACT OF ONTARIO EXPENDITURE CONTROL PLAN AND SOCIAL CONTRACT
KEY ISSUE
This report describes the impact of the Ontario Government's Expenditure Control Plan and
proposed Social Contract.
Res. #E76/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Jim Witty
THAT staff be directed to make immediate, necessary reductions to the approved 1993 Operating
and Capital Budget resulting from Ontario's Expenditure Control Plan announced April 23rd, 1993;
THAT representations be made on behalf of MTRCA to the Minister of Natural Resources and
Cabinet to seek to reduce the impact of the Expenditure Control Plan in 1993 and specifically to
request that the Conservation Land Tax Rebate Program not be eliminated;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report to the Finance and Administration Advisory Board on detailed
changes to the 1993 approved budget as soon as possible after the Province has provided official
information regarding 1993 operating and capital grants.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
On April 23rd, 1993, the Ontario Government announced the Expenditure Control Plan. Included in
the section dealing with the Ministry of Natural Resources was an announcement that grants to
Conservation Authorities would be reduced by 55 million. Specifically, the announcement said:
"the operational grants to 38 Conservation Authorities will be reduced. This will result in
job and program reductions for each Conservation Authority and may precipitate
rationalization."
Further, the announcement stated that a saving of 53.6 million would be realized by the
cancellation of the Conservation Land Tax Rebate Program. The announcement said:
"this tax rebate program for rural land owners will be reduced by 50% in 1993/94. The
plan is to pay outstanding 1992 rebates to Conservation Authorities and private and
owners with the remaining program re- directed at private land owners only, at the 100%
rebate rate."
Capital grants, in addition to Conservation Authorities, will be reduced by $2 million as part of a
previous restraint exercise.
ANALYSIS
The impact of the Expenditure Control Plan for MTRCA in 1993 includes a reduction of $782,000.
due to the cancellation of the Conservation Land Tax Rebate Program. If the $5 million
Conservation Authorities grant reduction is apportioned among all Conservation Authorities on the
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B84 '
SECTION III - ITEM FOR REFERRAL TO ANOTHER BOARD
17. IMPACT OF ONTARIO EXPENDITURE CONTROL PLAN AND SOCIAL CONTRACT (CONTD.)
basis of grants received in past years, the impact for MTRCA will be about $750,000.
Accordingly, staff have acted on the assumption that operating budget reductions could total as
much as $1.5 million. This does not include possible actions by the Authority's member
municipalities in response to the Provincial program.
With respect to the proposed Social Contract, Authority staff have taken no action to date.
Because it appears there is considerable uncertainty surrounding the implementation of the social
contract and the dollar amount to be saved, it would be precipitous for the Authority to take action
which would have a serious impact on Authority staff before these matters are further clarified.
It is our understanding that the impact of the social contract in terms of Expenditure Reduction will
be on top of the Expenditure Control Plan Reductions previously announced. However, it also
appears that any savings from the social contract can be used by organizations to implement re-
training and skills development to assist staff who are affected by the Expenditure Control Plan.
Staff have been advised that the announced savings expected under the Social Contract is not
negotiable. What is negotiable is how these savings are achieved. Until the Social Contract issue
becomes clearer staff will continue to monitor the situation and develop options for dealing with
the cuts and recommend action at the appropriate time.
IMPACT OF EXPENDITURE CONTROL PLAN
Management and Supervisory staff of the Authority have been meeting on a regular basis since the
announcement of the Expenditure Control Plan on April 23rd. Staff have reviewed in detail the
operating budget of the Authority and determined a number of expenditure reductions, some of
which must be implemented immediately, and other discretionary reductions which can be
implemented once the full impact of the Expenditure Control Program is known. Information
available to staff of the Authority at the present time is incomplete and it is hoped representations
to the Province by the Association of Conservation Authorities of Ontario and members of the
Authority may result in some 1993 reductions being deferred until 1994. However, it is clear that
significant reductions are necessary and because the Authority is almost 5 months into its fiscal
year it is necessary that some action be taken immediately to affect the changes required.
Following is a list of potential reductions which staff have identified:
• part-time, seasonal, wage and benefit (summer help)
• equipment budget
• office supplies
• electrical utility savings
• office renovations
• staff advertising
• set up prepaid insurance
• postponement of micro computer purchases
• rental property maintenance
• reduction in liability insurance excess coverage
• staff training and development
• staff /members Christmas party
• long service awards budget
B85 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993
SECTION III - ITEM FOR REFERRAL TO ANOTHER BOARD
17. IMPACT OF ONTARIO EXPENDITURE CONTROL PLAN AND SOCIAL CONTRACT (CONTD.)
• reduce stream guage service
• reduce radio service
• reduce hours of work in various locations
• flood warning answering service
• 1993 funded vacancies remain unfilled
• elimination of life guard program
• reduction in Conservation Areas promotion
• postponement of major maintenance in various locations
• changes to operations and re- assignment of staff
• elimination of cellular phone purchase
• Claremont Field Centre now seasonal
• keeping fewer horses at Black Creek Pioneer Village
• reduction in week -end switchboard service
• elimination of Director position, Program Services
• various reductions in public communicationsAll options with respect to increasing
revenue are being considered.
Some changes must be made immediately, including the elimination of seasonal part -time summer
help and the elimination of the life guard program, because these activities were due to start and to
eliminate them partway through the season is not practical. In the event that the funding cuts
required are not as severe as indicated, there is potential to reinstate major maintenance and some
equipment purchases as well as training and development and other opportunities.
In additi to the foregoing, staff have been asked to consider voluntarily reducing hours of work,
job shy and days off without pay. The Authority'- benefit program will be reviewed in its
entiret. Jeter —une if capping and reduction in ber.: .ts will assist in reducing premiums. The
senior s, .. r grow, being the Directors and CAO, have accepted an immediate wage roll -back of
2 %.
CONCLUSION
With great difficulty, we achieved a zero increase budget in 1992 and 1993. The members must
appreciate that the proposed expenditure reductions will have a severe impact on our ability to
delivery these services for which this Authority is responsible. For example, elimination of the
lifeguard program, reduced conservation land management, postponement and elimination of major
maintenance and significantly reduced facility operations.
Staff of the Authority at all levels have responded with dedication and professionalism in dealing
with this unexpected provincial action. In general, there is understanding of the need for the
Province to reduce its deficit, but concern is expressed, at the manner in which it has been
implemented. It seems to us unconscionable that these reductions should be implemented 5
months into our fiscal year when the nature of the crisis was well known to the government more
than 6 months ago. Action should have been taken then which would have allowed the Authority
to deal with this in a much more rational and timely fashion. Staff of the Authority are to be
commended for their understanding and creativity in responding to this difficult financial situation.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/93, MAY 7, 1993 B86
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:05 p.m., May 7, 1993.
William B. Grander J. Craig Mather
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
/bb.
Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
Qthe metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
minutes
JUNE 11, 1993
B87
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #4/93
The Executive Committee met at the Authority office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday,
June 11, 1993. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:
ABSENT
MINUTES
Res. #E77/93
Chair William Granger
Vice Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Lorna Jackson
Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/93 be approved.
DELEGATIONS
Paul Palleschi
Jim Witty
Richard O'Brien
Brian Harrison
CARRIED
Mr. Peter Weston of Weston and Associates Planning Consultants spoke to Agenda Item 1, sale of
surplus Authority land, north east corner of Jane Street and Steeles Avenue, and gave a overview
of the development proposed by 970545 Ontario Limited, also know as•Brentmuir Developments
(1993) Ltd. Mr. Joe Salvator of Spectra Architects Inc. presented preliminary drawings of the
project showing the siting of buildings, access and landscaping.
B88 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 199.
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND
-North East Corner of Jane Street and Steeles Avenue, City of Vaughan
KEY ISSUE
Status report of progress on implementation of conditions of Agreement of Purchase and Sale for
sale of surplus Authority land situate on the north east corner of Jane Street and Steeles Avenue in
the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York to 970545 Ontario Limited.
Res. # #E78/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report dated 1993.06.02., providing
information as to the progress on the sale of the Authority lands on the north east corner of Jane
Street and Steeles Avenue, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York to 970545 Ontario
Limited, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT the overall plans, specifications and site plan, including 150 suites, presented
by Spectra Architects Inc., dated June, 1993, on behalf of 970545 Ontario Limited be approved in
principle.
CARRIED
Lorna Jackson abstained from voting on this item.
BACKGROUND
On September 25, 1992, Authority members approved the of a parcel of surplus Authority
owned land, containing a total of 1.74 hectares (4.3) acres to 970545 Ontario Limited, on the
basis as set out in the appended copy of Resolution #149. On February 26, 1993, the Authority
extended the date for execution of the Agreement of Purchase and Sale from October 31, 1992, to
on or before February 28, 1993.
The Agreement of Purchase and Sale, in conformity with the provisions of the original Letter of
Intent was executed by the signing officers of the Authority on February 26, 1993. Since that
date, meetings have been held involving Authority staff with a development team assembled by the
purchaser. The purchaser's development team includes Joe Salvatore, Spectra Architects; Peter
Weston, Weston and Associates Planning Consultants; Roger Beaman of Thomson, Rogers
Barristers and Solicitors; Leonard Pitura, Link -Net Management Associates Inc.; Nick DiLorenzo of
970545 Ontario Limited; and, Ben Belantone, a representative of the sponsor group, Serena Non -
Profit Housing Corporation, an affiliate of the Calibro Canadian Confederation.
The development proposed to be carried out is in accordance with the concept as earlier approved
by the Authority and includes provision for seniors' housing, assisted senior citizens' housing,
senior's and children's daycare, accessory retail /commercial and club recreational facilities.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 B89
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND (CONTD.)
-North East Corner of Jane Street and Steeles Avenue, City of Vaughan
The closing of the sale is as scheduled on or before October 31, 1994. Applications have been
submitted to the City of Vaughan for Official Plan and Zoning By -Law amendments to permit the
proposed development. Meetings have been held with Provincial staff and an application will be
submitted to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs, the Ministry responsible for administering the
Parkway Belt regulations in the near future. The proposed development has been received by
Provincial officials and the process is on schedule to meet the proposed closing date.
2. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 WATERFRONT COMPONENT AND LAKE
ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 - 1994
- Pickering /Ajax Sector
-Brian Cruise and Christina Paciocco
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property on the Lake Ontario Waterfront, located at 1078 Beachpoint Promenade,
Town of Pickering under Land Acquisition Project 1987 - 1991 - Waterfront Component and Lake
Ontario Waterfront Regeneration Project 1992 - 1994, Pickering /Ajax Sector.
Res. #E79/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.168 acres, more or Tess, be purchased from
Brian Cruise and Christina Paciocco, said land being Lot 283 and Part of Lot 282, Plan 345, Town
of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham;
THAT the purchase price be $200,000.00 plus vendor's legal costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #51, Authority Meeting #3, May 2, 1986 and Resolution #100, Authority Meeting
#3/91, May 3, 1991 approving the projects.
B90 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 WATERFRONT COMPONENT AND
LAKEONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 - 1994 (CONTD.)
- Pickering /Ajax Sector
-Brian Cruise and Christina Paciocco
Situate on the property is a wood frame dwelling together with a detached boathouse /garage and a
wood dock.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owners and, subject to approval, an Agreement has
now been reached with respect to the purchase price.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
A plan illustrating the specific location was available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004 -12 -502 - Waterfront Open Space and it is proposed
the funding be obtained from land sale revenue. The land sale revenue will be derived from the
sale of surplus Authority owned lots in the Frenchman's Bay Area. Authority staff have obtained
an Option to Purchase Agreement on this property and the Option will not be exercised until the
Authority has firm agreements for the sale of the surplus lots.
3. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 WATERFRONT COMPONENT AND
• LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 - 1994
- Pickering /Ajax Sector
-Mary Elizabeth Heath
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property on the Lake Ontario Waterfront, located at 505 Park Crescent, Town of
Pickering, under Land Acquisition Project 1987 - 1991 - Waterfront Component and Lake Ontario
Waterfront Regeneration Project 1992 - 1994, Pickering /Ajax Sector.
Res. #E80/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.100 acres, more or less, be purchased from
Mary Elizabeth Heath, said land being Part of Lot 10, Plan 270, Town of Pickering, Regional
Municipality of Durham;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 B91
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 WATERFRONT COMPONENT AND
LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 - 1994 (CONTD.)
- Pickering /Ajax Sector
-Mary Elizabeth Heath
THAT the purchase price be $90,000.00, plus Vendor's legal costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #51, Authority Meeting #3, May 2, 1986 and Resolution #100, Authority Meeting
#3/91, May 3, 1991 approving the projects.
Situate on the property is a detached insulbrick clad bungalow.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owners and their solicitor William Stutz, and, subject to
approval, an Agreement has now been reached with respect to the purchase price.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
A plan illustrating the specific location was available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004 -12 -502 - Waterfront Open Space and it.is proposed
the funding be obtained from land sale revenue. The land sale revenue will be derived from the
sale of surplus Authority owned lots in the Frenchman's Bay Area. Authority staff have obtained
an Option to Purchase Agreement on this property and the Option will not be exercised until the
Authority has firm agreements for the sale of the surplus lots.
B92 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE. 11, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENTS
-16 Brucedale Crescent and 1 Jennifer Court, City of North York
KEY ISSUE
Request from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for concurrence to enter into encroachment
agreements, affecting Authority owned lands managed by The Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto.
Res. #E81 /93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Authority concur with The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto entering into encroachment agreements, as a means of resolving
encroachment problems with owners on lands owned by The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority in the vicinity of 16 Brucedale Crescent and 1 Jennifer Court, City of North
York, on the basis as outlined in the appended Clause No. 10, contained in Report No. 23 of The
Management Committee, which was adopted by the Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto, at its meeting held on May 12, 1993;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Staff of the Authority, including the Chief Administrative Officer, have participated extensively with
staff of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto in attempting to resolve encroachment issues.
Authority staff is in agreement that in certain instances such as the two cases at hand, which have
been dealt with by the Metro Encroachment Review Committee, that encroachment agreements are
a necessary means of satisfactorily resolving encroachment issues.
5. SALE OF LAND
- Vicinity of 32 Craigmont Drive, City of North York
KEY ISSUE
Sale of a fragment of Authority owned land not required for Authority purposes to resolve a long
outstanding encroachment problem.
Res. #E82/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Executive Committee consider this item in closed session.
The Committee rose from closed session
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 893
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. SALE OF LAND (CONTD.)
- Vicinity of 32 Craigmont Drive, City of North York
Res. #E83/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Richard O'Brien
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a claim from Jacob and Edith Schiller to ownership of a
fragment of Authority owned land in the vicinity of 32 Craigmont Drive in the City of North;
AND WHEREAS Jacob and Edith Schiller have agreed to suspend litigation on the basis that the
Authority will make the lands available for sale;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to proceed
with a sale in this instance;
THAT a small fragment of Authority owned land containing 560 square feet (.005 hectares), more
or less, be conveyed to Jacob and Edith Schiller, said land being Part of Block A, Registered Plan
7800, City of North York, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
THAT consideration is to be the sum of $1,000.00;
THAT said conveyance be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Members of the Authority, at a meeting held on March 27, 1992, adopted Res. #69:
"THAT the Authority solicitors be authorized and instructed to participate with staff of The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, in commencing legal action where required to recover
possession of Authority owned land currently under agreement with The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto for Park /and purposes."
The Schiller's live at 32 Craigmont Drive in the City of North York and have claimed possessory
title to the subject lands. The Authority land is enclosed by a fence and the deck of the swimming
pool is located on the land. The evidence is substantive that the encroachments have existed for a
considerable length of time.
The subject land was acquired by the Authority in 1976 by arms length purchase under the Don
River Flood Plain Lands Component of the Land Acquisition Project from Metland Professional
Investments Corp.
B94 = XECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. SALE OF LAND (CONTD.)
- Vicinity of 32 Craigmont Drive, City of North York
This location has been dealt with by the Metro Encroachment Review Committee and Metro staff
are supportive of the proposed resolution of this long outstanding problem. A confidential letter
from the Authority solicitor relating to this matter and the litigation of encroachment matters in
general was circulated with the Agenda of this meeting. A plan of this area was also available at
the meeting.
6. REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE FEE SCHEDULE
-Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation Services
KEY ISSUE
Revisions to the MTRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for Fill, Construction and Alteration to
Waterways Regulation services.
Res. #E84/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
THAT the revisions to the MTRCA Administrative Fee Schedule for Fill, Construction and Alteration
to Waterways Regulation services, as outlined in Appendix EX.10/93, be approved and
implemented effective July 1, 1993.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 1988, the Authority initiated administrative service fees for Fill, Construction and Alteration to
Waterways Regulation services. The fee structure and rates were modelled after that of the Credit
Valley Conservation Authority for consistency. Since then, the fee structure has not been revised;
however, rates have increased from time to time as approved through the MTRCA Annual budget
process. The last fee increase was made in 1991.
In 1991, staff also reported on the Association of Conservation Authorities of Ontario (ACAO)
working group recommendations regarding the charging of water management fees. This working
group was struck to review the variation in conservation authority fee schedules, rates and
associated implementation processes. In particular, the ACAO recommended that each
conservation authority establish an appeal mechanism to manage any unresolved business arising
from the charging of water management fees. Staff reported at that time that MTRCA "water
management fees" generally comply with the ACAO recommendations. It is our practice to
respond to any enquiries regarding the fee structure and /or rates at a staff level and, if unable to
resolve reported concerns, to direct the issue to the Executive Committee. To date this has not
been necessary.
The fee structure and rates have been modified slightly to better reflect the level of administrative
effort associated with services while maintaining: affordability and simplicity; reasonable rate
adjustments.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 B95
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE FEE SCHEDULE (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation Services
RATIONALE
A summary of the proposed change is shown on Figure 1 (page 83 of minutes).
In general:
• Rates have been increased from $10.00 to $115.00 over current, the latter being
associated with a change in fee structure.
• Works associated with multi -lot and multi -unit development applications have been
identified as a separate unit and are subject to the highest rate. These works were
previously identified within the "other" category as shown on Figure 1.
• The remainder of the fee schedule structure has not been adjusted.
The administrative service fee was not designed to generate 100% user -fee revenue.
Approximately $120,000.00 in revenue is generated per year, on average. Based on 1992
revenues 0127,500.00) and service patterns, it is anticipated that approximately $35,000.00 in
additional revenue would be generated in 1993 and $100,00.00 in 1994.
FIGURE 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEES
FILL, CONSTRUCTION AND ALTERATION TO WATERWAYS REGULATIONS
ONTARIO REGULATION 158
PERMIT APPLICATIONS
FROM
TO
Works on Personal
Residential Property
S 55
per application
$ 65
per application
Municipal Projects (Regional /Local)
$ 55
per application
$ 75
per application
Multi -lot (more than 3) or Multi -Unit
development and associated infrastructure
(SWM ponds, services, outfalls, roads,
etc.).
$185
per application
$300
per application
Other
(Utilities, commercial, industrial additions, etc.)
$ 200
per application
Permit Revisions
50% of current fee
50% of current fee
Permit Renewals
$ 40
$ 65
Exemptions -
Municipal Projects on lands under
management agreement with the
Authority
No Charge
No Charge
B96
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE FEE SCHEDULE (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation Services
ONTARIO REGULATION 158
PROPERTY SPECIFIC INFORMATION
FROM
TO
Property Searches - general
solicitor /realter enquiries for real estate
transactions
$ 40
S 75
Municipal Building Permit Approvals -
site plan clearances (not regulated)
$ 40
$ 65
Staff is recommending that our current administrative process for the renewal of approved permits
be formalized and modified slightly, such that:
permits be issued for a two year period, rather than on an annual basis, with the potential
opportunity of renewal for a one year period; and,
that if within three years upon receipt of a permit work has not yet commenced, a new
application be required.
These conditions will be incorporated into a revised permit application form such that the applicant
will be required to consent to the above upon submission of the application.
7. CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL, VAUGHAN
- Referral to Ontario Municipal Board
KEY ISSUE
To provide a status update for an Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing scheduled for June 14,
1993, in the matter of a referral by Marbloom Investments Ltd. and Wilderton Investments Ltd. to •
settle and determine terms and conditions of a site plan for the development of lands comprising of
Lots 28 and 29, Concession 8, in the City of Vaughan to permit a 27 hole golf course (Crooked
Creek Golf Course) which affects, in part, the valleylands of the East Branch of the Humber River.
Res. #E85/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Lois Griffin
THAT staff prepare to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing scheduled for June 14, 1993,
with legal representation from the firm of Gardiner, Roberts seeking an adjournment of the hearing,
failing which a refusal of the applications would be pursued;
THAT the forested lands comprising Lots 28 and 29, Concession 8, in the City of Vaughan, be
formally designated as an Environmentally Significant Area based on existing MTRCA criteria 3, 5
and 6 and that staff determine the boundary of the ESA through the 1993 ESA Update Study;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 B97
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
7. CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL, VAUGHAN (CONTD.)
- Referral to Ontario Municipal Board
THAT the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and the City of Vaughan be requested to recognize the
Environmentally Significant Area within their appropriate planning documents;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Executive Committee on the outcome of the Ontario
Municipal Board hearing.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Executive Committee Meeting #3/93, May 7, 1993, Resolution #E69/93 was adopted:
"THAT staff prepare to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing scheduled for
June 14, 1993 objecting to the current development applications for the
construction of a 27 -hole golf course on Lots 28 & 29, Concession 8, City of
Vaughan, Humber River Watershed;
THAT the firm of Gardiner, Roberts be retained to represent the Authority at the
hearing;
THAT a joint case and legal counsel among the Authority, the City of Vaughan and
the Ministry of Natural Resources be pursued;
THAT staff continue to discuss revisions to the current development applications
with the proponents, the City of Vaughan and the Ministry of Natural Resources in
an attempt to resolve outstanding issues prior to the OMB hearing;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report to the Executive Committee at Meeting #4/93, June 11,
1993 on the status of discussions and the direction to be taken at the OMB hearing on
June 14, 1993."
On May 13, 1993, Authority staff met with representatives for the golf course proposal along with
staff from the Ministry of Natural Resources and the City of Vaughan, in an attempt to resolve
outstanding issues prior to the OMB hearing. At this meeting, a number of issues and concerns
were raised by the participating parties, which resulted in the submission of two additional concept
plans by the proponent (Concepts 5 and 6).
While the latest design concepts attempted to address staff concerns, none have addressed them
fully. There remains insufficient detail to fully assess the site specific impacts of the development
on the valleyland; however, staff are of the opinion that it represents significant and unacceptable
modifications to the existing valley feature and functions as reflected in our most recent
correspondence to the city dated May 25, 1993.
B98 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
7. CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL, VAUGHAN (CONTD.)
- Referral to Ontario Municipal Board
The concept plans do not provide a sufficient level of information to assess the golf course design
requirements, for example drainage, access, regrading, engineering works (slopes, watercourse,
flooding) and therefore cannot quantify the resultant impacts on the valley features and functions•
associated with these design requirements. Based on the information provided and site inspections
by staff, it is apparent that the valley feature and functions, including the protection of the ESA,
will be negatively impacted.
The proposed Zoning Amendment Application and Site Development Application were tabled at the
City of Vaughan Committee of the '. DIe meeting of May 25, 1993, at which time they were
deferred to the council meeting of J .e 7, 1993, in order to allow community groups more time to
review the latest proposals.
The planning report prepared by cit tall recommends the approv' of the Zon. 1 Amendment
Application, subject to the following conditions:
(1) (a) The lands located west of the Humber River and the limited areas east and south of
the Humber River, which are currently zoned A Agricultural Zone be re -zoned 0S2 -H
Open Space Park Holding Zone.
(b) The lands located east of the Humber River, currently zoned OS1 Open Space
Conservation Zone, be amended to specifically remove a "golf course" as a
permitted use in this area.
(c) That the remaining OS1 Open Space Conservation Lands be zoned OS1 -H Open
Space Conservation Holding Zone.
(2) Prior to the removal of the Holding Zone, the applicant shall have received all the necessary
permits and approvals from The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
and from the Ministry of Natural Resources and shall have received site plan approval from
Vaughan council;
(3) That staff be directed to prepare the necessary zoning by -law for council's consideration at
the next available council meeting.
City staff are of the opinion that by applying a hold symbol designation this will allow council to
evaluate the specific merits of particular aspects of the application at the site development stage.
Land use decisions affecting natural resources must be supported by information that demonstrates
the conservation of the natural resource. This typically requires preliminary design detail and, in
some instances, detailed design information. In this instance, the impacts associated with the golf
course proposal will be more extensive than shown on the concept plans. For example, the
removal of vegetation associated with the construction of tees, greens, and fairways will, in the
opinion of staff, further impact the unstable slopes associated with this property. Additionally, the
siting of tees and greens in areas with high water tables within the flood plain will entail substantial
filling which will impact on the control of flooding.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 B99
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL, VAUGHAN (CONTD.)
- Referral to Ontario Municipal Board
Authority staff is not supportive of the approach recommended by city staff since in our opinion we
do not think it is in the interest of the Authority to defer the resolution of all outstanding issues to
site plan approval. We also note that, in the opinion of our lawyers, it is questionable whether
Authority concerns would be dealt with given the legal limits of site plan approval under the
Planning Act.
Accordingly, our lawyers have recommended that the Authority seek an adjournment to the Ontario
Municipal Board hearing which staff understand will be heard on the first day of said hearing.
Additionally, based on site visits by Authority staff, air photo assessment and the information
provided by the proponents (Crooked Creek Golf Course Environmental Evaluation, 1992, prepared
by Michalski Associates), the majority of the valleylands would meet current Environmentally
Significant Area (ESA) designation criteria. We are seeking the designation of this ESA by the
Authority, through the Executive Committee, and further recommending that the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and the City of Vaughan recognize the ESA in their planning documents.
OUTCOME OF CITY OF VAUGHAN COUNCIL MEETING, JUNE 7, 1993.
At the Council Meeting, the following deputations were made related to this application:
Mr. Paul Rycroft, Marbloom Investments Limited, Wilderton Investments Limited;
Mr. Roger Dickinson, resident;
Mrs. Amy Darker, West Humber Naturalists;
Mr. John Becher, P.A.L.S.;
Mr. Gerry Metzger, Kleinburg & Area Ratepayers Association;
Mr. lain Craig, Environmental Committee of the Kleinburg & Area Ratepayers Association;
Mrs. Margaret Cramner -Byng, Richmond Hill Naturalists;
Mr. Luciano Martin, A.R.C.H.
MTRCA staff were present and responded to questions directed by council related to the
Authority comments on this proposal.
Pursuant to discussion on the item, Vaughan council did not support the recommendation of their
planning staff, instead requesting a draft by -law be prepared which would have the effect of
designating the A- Agricultural lands west of the Regional flood plain to 0S2 - Open Space to allow
the golf course use. The balance of the lands would be placed in an OS1- Open Space
Conservation Exception Zone which would preclude a golf course use. It is our understanding that
council required that the 0S2 designation be subject to confirmation by the MTRCA pursuant to the
submission of a geotechnical report by the proponent.
Authority staff note in reviewing the draft by -law endorsed by council that the requirement for a
geotechnical report was not included. Pursuant to discussions with the Commissioner of Planning,
it was his opinion, from an implementation standpoint, that council's request could not be
addressed in the by -law unless a Hold symbol was applied to the 0S2 designation, which council
did not support.
The condition was not therefore included. Authority staff will pursue this issue further through the
Ontario Municipal Board hearing as the 0S2 zoning includes steep valley sideslopes that are
unstable and are not suitable for golf course use.
B100 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS
- Adjacent to 18 Pineway Boulevard, Don River Watershed
- Adjacent to 20 Pineway Boulevard, Don River Watershed
- Adjacent to 40 Pineway Boulevard, Don River Watershed
- Adjacent to 31 Maryport Avenue, Black Creek Area of Humber River Watershed
- Adjacent to 49 Brixham Terrace, Black Creek Area of Humber River Watershed
-City of North York
KEY ISSUE
The Authority is in receipt of a request from the Metropolitan Toronto Encroachment Review
Committee to explore the possibility of land exchanges and sales involving small fragments of land
at certain locations.
Res. #E86/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THAT the potential disposal of small fragments of land at the locations set out below be referred to
the Authority staff for review and discussions with adjacent property owners in accordance with
established Authority policies: adjacent to 18 Pineway Boulevard, Don River Watershed, City of
North York; adjacent to 20 Pineway Boulevard, Don River Watershed, City of North York;
adjacent to 40 Pineway Boulevard, Don River Watershed, City of North York; adjacent to 31
Maryport Avenue, Black Creek Area of Humber River Watershed, City of North York; adjacent to
49 Brixham Terrace, Black Creek Area of Humber River Watershed, City of North York;
AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date
recommending further action.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
These matters are being brought to your attention in accordance with Resolution #26 adapted at
Authority Meeting #1/91, held February 22, 1991.
9. MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO VALLEY AND SHORELINE REGENERATION
PROJECT 1992 -1996
- Supply of Quarry Stone to Kingsbury and Fishleigh Erosion Control Projects
KEY ISSUE
The Tender Opening Sub - Committee (Appendix TO.9/93) opened tenders for the supply and
delivery of quarry stone on April 23, 1993, and recommended that all tenders be referred to staff
for review and report.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 B101
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO VALLEY AND SHORELINE REGENERATION
PROJECT 1992 -1996 (CONTD.)
- Supply of Quarry Stone to Kingsbury and Fishleigh Erosion Control Projects
Res. #87/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THAT tenders ED93 -02 and ED93 -03 for the supply of armourstone be awarded to J. C. Wiles &
Sons at a total cost of $82,800 (excluding G.S.T. and P.S.T.) and the supply of rip rap stone be
awarded to Nelson Aggregates Co. at a total cost of $41,175 (excluding G.S.T. and P.S.T.).
RATIONALE
CARRIED
The quotations received were based on a total estimated requirement of 4,000 tonnes of
armourstone and 3,000 tonnes of rip rap for the Kingsbury and Fishleigh Erosion Control Projects in
the City of Scarborough.
Staff have reviewed the tenders and recommend that the lowest quotation received for the supply
of armourstone at the unit cost of $22.40 /tonne (excluding GST) from J. C. Wiles & Sons be
accepted. Staff are also recommending that the lowest quotation received for the supply of rip rap
stone at the unit cost of S15.25 /tonne (excluding GST) from Nelson Aggregates Co. also be
accepted.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The recent Provincial budget included a new 8% sales tax on sand, topsoil and unfinished stone
effective July 1, 1993. The quantities of stone required have therefore been reduced by 300
tonnes for each tender to offset the increased costs for the new sales tax.
Funds are budgeted under the "Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Valley and Shoreline
Regeneration Project 1992 -1996" under account numbers 131 -03 (Kingsbury Project) and 138 -03
(Fishleigh Drive Project).
10. DON WATERSHED STRATEGY
- Technical Review of Draft "Water" Strategies
KEY ISSUE
Hiring of consultant to assist with the technical review of the draft "water" strategies as part of
Don Watershed Strategy development.
Res. #E88/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THAT Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd. be retained to conduct a technical review of the draft water
strategies, set priorities for implementation of the strategies, and prepare implementation guidelines
for Don Watershed stormwater management criteria, at a total cost not to exceed $ 12,950. plus
GST.
CARRIED
B102 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. DON WATERSHED STRATEGY (CONTD.)
- Technical Review of Draft "Water" Strategies
BACKGROUND
In October, 1992, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (MTRCA)
established a Don Watershed Task Force to guide the development of a management strategy for
the Don River Watershed. To date, working groups of the Task Force have prepared draft
strategies for the protection and regeneration of water, flora, and fauna resources and for
community issues related to valley and stream corridor access and watershed education.
The draft "water" strategies were primarily drawn from the recommendations of previous studies
which addressed Don River water quality. These studies included the Toronto Area Watershed
Management Studies (TAWMS, Don River Water Quality, 1989) and the Metro Toronto and Region
Remedial Action Plan (Draft Options Paper, 1990). The "water" strategies generally address
sources of impact to the quality and quantity of Don watershed water resources, including urban
runoff, combined sewer overflows, cross - connections between sanitary and storm sewer systems
and spills. Recommendations from previous studies were updated where necessary and augmented
with additional recommendations and suggested implementation measures to reflect the current
state of knowledge. Local municipalities and agencies have reviewed and supported, in principle,
the recommendations of those previous studies. In fact, some municipalities have already begun to
act on those recommendations by undertaking major projects (e.g. City of Toronto Sewer System
Master Plan, 1993). However, a number of factors seem to be impeding the implementation of
many of the other recommendations (e.g. funding, conflicts with current policy, etc.). These same
factors must be resolved in order to implement the Don Strategy. The Strategy must assign some
indication of priority for each recommended action to provide clearer direction to the implementing
agencies for the short and long term. Furthermore, guidelines for implementing Don Watershed
stormwater management criteria are necessary.
At its April 22, 1993 meeting, the Don Watershed Task Force resolved:
"THAT draft Water, Flora, and Fauna components of the Don Watershed Strategy be
received;
AND THAT an initial round of consultations be undertaken by Authority staff to receive
review and comment from provincial, municipal and technical staff and other experts."
RATIONALE
The Authority has given the Don Watershed Task Force an extremely tight timeframe for the
completion of the Don Watershed Strategy. The technical review of the draft strategies, a critical
component in the development of the complete Strategy document, must be completed by July 16,
1993. In consideration of the time constraints and the need for a level of expertise which is not
currently available at the Authority, staff recommend the need for consulting assistance. In an
effort to ensure optimum cost effectiveness, staff will work closely with the consultant by
providing all support services and background research under the consultant's advisement.
The intent of this work is to provide clear direction for the implementation of Don River Watershed
"water" strategies at the subwatershed level. Although a technical review of the "water"
strategies cannot be conducted in isolation from other aspects of the Don Watershed Strategy (i.e.
flora, fauna, community issues), staff believe that a focused review with the assistance of a water
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 B103
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. DON WATERSHED STRATEGY (CONTD.)
- Technical Review of Draft "Water" Strategies
quality expert is necessary to ensure acceptance and subsequent stakeholder commitment during
implementation. Products of this exercise will provide municipalities and other implementing
agencies with direction for strategy implementation and priorities.
MTRCA staff determined the following consultant selection criteria:
• water quality expertise;
• knowledge of local water quality problems, remedial actions, and issues associated
with their implementation;
• familiarity with local agency and municipal policies and practices;
• awareness of new directions in stormwater management and watershed planning;
• demonstrated ability to facilitate discussions;
• recent relevant experience;
• ability to meet deadlines; and
• competitive daily rate.
Based on a careful evaluation, staff considered Mr. Doug Andrews of Marshall Macklin Monaghan
Ltd. to be the only individual whose qualifications fully met the selection criteria. Mr. Andrews has
extensive experience in local watershed management, with particular emphasis on water quality
issues. While employed previously by the Ministry of the Environment, he was directly involved in
the Toronto Area Watershed Management Studies and acted as Coordinator of the Metro Toronto
and Region Remedial Action Plan. Therefore, he has an acute awareness of the issues associated
with the implementation of those project's recommendations and of local agency positions. That
knowledge will be of direct relevance to the Don Strategy implementation.
Through his consulting work, Mr. Andrews is currently project manager of the Hanlon Creek
Watershed Plan Study, the Emery Creek Water Quality Improvement Project (a retrofit stormwater
management project within Metro Toronto), and has recently coordinated water quality studies for
the Joshua's Creek Watershed Plan. He has been actively involved in the preparation of the
Stormwater Best Management Practices Planning and Design Manual and associated studies. As
part of this latter project, Mr. Andrews and his colleague, Mr. Graham Bryant, conducted a series
of workshops with MNR, MOEE, CA, and municipal staff to develop approaches for improved
stormwater planning and design. Overall, Mr. Andrews would bring to this project valuable
experience from other jurisdictions and a familiarity with local issues and relevant staff, which
would be of particular benefit considering the Don Strategy's tight timeframe.
As a result of the foregoing evaluation, the specific professional expertise required, and the severe
time constraints, a formal proposal call was not undertaken. The selection procedure followed is in
accordance with the Authority's purchasing policy for consulting services on projects of this size.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The consultant shall facilitate workshops with provincial and municipal staff and prepare a final
report with recommendations for:
• revisions to draft "water" strategies;
• agency /group responsible for implementation of each strategy;
B104 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4193, JUNE 11, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. DON WATERSHED STRATEGY (CONTD.)
- Technical Review of Draft "Water" Strategies
• preferred implementation measures for each strategy;
• priority for the implementation of strategies for each subwatershed and
implementing agency;
• guidelines for the implementation of flood, erosion, and water quality control criteria
for application in new development, major redevelopment, redevelopment /infill, and
retrofit situations within the Don watershed.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for these services are available in the Don Watershed account #1 18 -10, subject to
finalization of provincial funding in 1993.
11. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Res. #E89/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lois Griffin
THAT the permit application for Romana Rajasooriar, listed as Agenda Item 11 (k), to regrade in
order to level the rear yard, on Lot 10, Registered Plan 4399, (41 Burnview Crescent), in the City
of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed, be approved in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan and Cross Sectional Drawings; prepared by Romana Rajasooriar; revised as
received on April 23, 1993.
Res. #E90/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
CARRIED
Richard O'Brien
Lois Griffin
THAT the permit application for Thoroughbred Developments Ltd., listed as Agenda Item 11 (o), for
permission to place fill for lot grading purposes, on Part Lot 31, Concession 2 FTH, (Queen's Plate
Drive), in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River Watershed, be approved in accordance with the
following documents and plans that form part of this permit.
(1) Plans; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.; Project 91886; Drawing 2 dated April
19, 1993; Drawing No. 301 dated April 15, 1993;
(2) Site Grading and Paving Plan; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.; Project
91886; Drawing No. 302, Revision 4 dated May 28, 1993; received June 7, 1993.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 B105
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Res. #E91/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THAT the permit application for Cougs Investments Ltd., listed as Agenda Item 11 (p), to alter a
small tributary in order to accommodate the redevelopment of the subject property, on Part Lot 27,
Concession 3, (Fairport Road and Finch Avenue), in the Town of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay
Watershed, be approved in accordance to the following documents and plans which form part of
this permit:
(1) Site Plan and Cross - sectional Drawings; prepared by G.M. Sernas and Associates Limited;
Project No. 93004; Drawing No. 9 -103; Revised as received on June 3, 1993.
Res. #E92/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
CARRIED
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THAT the permit applications listed herein as (a) to (t) inclusive and added permit applications (u) to
(x) inclusive, with the exception of (k) (o) and (p), be approved, in accordance to the information
contained within the reports.
CARRIED
(a) Frank & Maria Giovannone
To construct within the flood plain, on Part Lot 13, Registered Plan Block 5, Plan
Bolton 7 (15 Chapel Street), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan Sections and Elevation Plans; prepared by G. Grant - Robinson, Architect Inc.;
Drawing Al & A2, Dated April 1993.
(b) Mazurka Construction Ltd.
To alter a watercourse, on Pt. Lot 16, Concession 1 WHS, (Hurontario Street south
of Mayfield Road), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by F.J. Ternoway and Associates Ltd.; Drawing Numbers 3A, 23 dated
August 1992.
(2) Plans; prepared by F.J. Ternoway and Associates Ltd.; Drawing Numbers 1, 3, 24, 25, 26,
27 dated July 1992.
B106 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993
SECTION 11 - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(c) The Region of York - Transportation Dept.
To construct within a flood plain, on Part Lots 10 & 11, Concession 3, (Langstaff
Road, between Keele and Dufferin Streets), in the City of Vaughan, Don River
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Mitchell, Pound & Braddock Ltd.; Site No. 37 -139; Drawing No. 1,
received April 13, 1993; and Drawing No. 8, received May 12, 1993.
(d) Regional Municipality of York - Transportation Dept.
To alter a watercourse, on Part Lots 20 & 21, Concession 6, (Major Mackenzie Drive East
of Pine Valley Drive, Woodend Place), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) New Construction Plan; prepared by Regional Municipality of York; Contract No. 93 -16;
Drawing No. P- 1023 -30; received March 18, 1993.
(e) The City of Vaughan - Engineering Department
To place fill within a regulated area, construct within a flood plain and alter a waterway, on
Part Lots 15 & 16 , Concession 9, (Rutherford Road, west of Highway #27), in the City of
Vaughan, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by R.J. Burnside & Associates Ltd.; Drawing No.s B -130 -1 to B- 130 -14; 6-
130-16 to B- 130 -18 and B- 130 -20 received on May 19, 1993.
(f) Chris & Dianna Karrandias
To construct within a flood plain, on Lot 2, Registered Plan 4064, (15 Allan Park
Road), in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Intercity Construction Co. Ltd.; Drawing No.s Al, A2 and A3, dated
April 1993; received April 19, 1993.
(2) Structural Analysis & Foundation Wall Detail; prepared by K.K. Engineering Inc.; File No.
93710; Drawing Nos. SKS1 & SKS2, dated April 28/93; received May 6, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 B107
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(g) City of North York - Parks & Recreation Department
To place fill within a regulated area and construct within a flood plain, on Part Lot
21, Concession 4, (East of Tobermory Drive, north of Finch Avenue), in the City of
North York, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by the City of North York - Parks & Recreation Dept.; Project No. 2630;
Drawing No. 1, revised on May 26, 1993; Drawing No. P1, revised on May 27, 1993,
received June 1, 1993.
(h) Westside Holdings Ltd.
To place fill in a regulated area, on Part Lot 13, Concession 1 WYS, (57 LineIle
Street), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.; Project No. 92972; Drawing No. 1;
dated January, 1993.
(2) Cross - sections; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.; Project No. 92972; dated
May 19, 1993.
(3) Landscape Plan; prepared by John H. Day Consultants Ltd.; dated June 1, 1993.
(i) Peter McCarter & Angie Hamilton
To construct within the flood plain, on Lot 7, Registered Plan 2405, (41 Donino
Avenue), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan and Details; prepared by Paul & De Valence Inc.; Drawing No.s A -1, A -2 & A -3;
Project Number 9301, dated May 6, 1993.
(i) Richard & Eleanor Dobbs
To place one inch of top soil in a fill regulated area, on Lot 2, Registered Plan 3845,
(92A Cedarbrae Boulevard), in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan Sketch & Notes on Survey Plan of Lots 1 & 2, Registered Plan 3845, City of
Scarborough; Prepared by John McSkimming, Ontario Land Surveyor; dated February 5,
1991; received on May 20, 1993.
B108 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(I) Mrs. Margaret A. Montgomery
To place fill within a regulated area, on Block F, Registered Plan 280, (Mill Road), in
the Township of King, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by RCG Design Associates; Drawing No. A -1, dated July 7, 1992;
received May 18, 1993.
(2) Montgomery Garage North & South Elevations; prepared by RCG Design Associates;
received June 1, 1993.
(m) The City of Vaughan - Engineering Dept.
To construct within a flood plain and alter a waterway, on Part Lots 30 & 31,
Concession 6, (Kirby Road, east of Pine Valley Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared tv Fred Schaeffer & Associates Ltd.; Project No. 92 -E -1509; Drawing Nos.
1, 2, 3 and 4, dated February 1993; received May 18, 1993.
(2) Landscape Plan; Prepared by Strybos Associates Ltd.; Project No. 93 -1108; Drawing No. 1;
revised date June 8, 1993; Received June 9, 1993.
(n) Thomas & Irene Best
To place fill within a regulated area, on Lot 99, Registered Plan 1478, (33
Lakeshore Drive), in the City of Etobicoke, Lake Ontario Waterfront Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan and Cross - Section Drawings; Prepared by Irene Best; revised as received June 9,
1993.
(a) The Elgin East Developer's Group
To alter a watercourse by constructing low flow channel protection, on Part Lot 25,
Concession 2 EYS, (southeast of Elgin Mills Road & Bayview Avenue), in the Town
of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Rouge A & B Outfall Channel Improvements, Elgin East Community Plan; prepared by
Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.; Contract #85248; Drawings P -1, P -2, P -3; revised as
received May 31, 1993;
(2) Request for Quotation, Elgin East Developer's Group, Watercourse Improvements; dated
May 11, 1993 and Addendum dated May 13, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 B109
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(r) R. Clark Sheridan
To place fill and regrade in order to construct a house, on Lot 24, Registered Plan
3659, (108 Westwood Lane), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Lot Grading Plan of Lot 24, Registered Plan 3659; File No. 91/028; prepared by Centrehill
Corporation as received on April 29, 1993.
(s) Garry Sugden
To excavate for a pool, on Lot 39, Registered Plan 65M -2442, (29 Harmony Hill
Crescent), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Sugden Residence, Backyard Pool Plan and Cross - sections; Prepared by Markham
Landscaping Nurseries Ltd.; Project #93006; Drawing L1, Revision 2; received June 8,
1993.
(t) Riverfield Homes Ltd.
To construct a storm sewer outfall and place fill, on Part Lot 16 & Lots 14 & 15,
Registered Plan 2210, (Church Street and Weldrick Road East), in the Town of
Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Grading Plan, Lots 14 & 15, Part Lot 16, Registered Plan 2210, Town of Richmond Hill;
prepared by Higgins Engineering Ltd.; Drawing 1219 -405A; revised as received June 7,
1993;
(2) Site Servicing Plan, Lots 14 & 15, Part Lot 16, Registered Plan 2210, Town of Richmond
Hill; prepared by Higgins Engineering Ltd.; Drawing 1219 -405, revised as received on
June 7, 1993.
(u) The City of Vausahan
To alter a watercourse, on Part Lots 25, 26, Concession 7, ( Teston Road west of Pine
Valley Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan & Culvert Details for Teston Road Culvert; prepared by Totten, Sims, Hubicki
Associates; Project No. 42- 18400; Drawings 1 & 2; dated June, 1993.
(2) Letter of Undertaking from the City of Vaughan; dated June 9, 1993.
B110 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(v) Trans - Northern Pipelines Ltd.
To construct in the flood plain, on Pt. Lot 30, Concession 8 F.H., in the City of North York;
and Part Lot 19, Concession 6 WYS, in the City of Etobicoke, (Summerlea Park), Humber
River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Motorized Block Valve and Check Valve Drawings; prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan
Ltd.; Project No. 2092216 -03; dated June, 1992.
(w) 999013 Ontario Limited
To alter a remnant portion of a watercourse, on Lot 1, Concession 1, (Port Union and Rozell
Roads), in the City of Scarborough, Waterfront.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Lot Drainage and House Servicing and General Services Plans; prepared by Cumming
Cockburn Ltd; drawing Nos. 5098 -100 to 5098 -105; received March 23, 1993.
(2) Letter of Correspondence on the proposed plantings; prepared by Cumming Cockburn;
received on June 9, 1993.
(x) Bramalea Limited
To construct a stormwater management facility, on Part Lot 35, Concession 1, (Woodview
Avenue and Twyn River Drive), in the Town of Pickering, Rouge River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Stormwater Management Ponds Rehabilitation Planting Details and Notes; prepared by
Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects; Project No. 83247; Drawing Nos. 1 -2; revised as
received on June 8, 1993.
(2) Stormwater Management Pond Details; Prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.;
Project No. 87449; Drawings Nos. 1 -3; revised as received on June 8, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/93, JUNE 11, 1993 8111
NEW BUSINESS
AUTHORITY MINUTES
Res. #93/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
THAT the minutes of all Authority, Executive and Advisory Board meetings be distributed with the
Agenda of the following meeting.
CARRIED
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:30 a.m., June 11, 1993.
William B. Granger J. Craig Mather
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
/bb.
JULY 9, 1993
Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
y
minutes
B112
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #5/93
The Executive Committee met at the Authority office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday,
July 9, 1993. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:
ABSENT
MINUTES
Res. #E94/93
Chair William Granger
Vice Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Lorna Jackson
Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #4/93 be approved.
Paul Palleschi
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
Brian Harrison
CARRIED
DELEGATIONS
(a) USE OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS BY FOREST VALLEY DAY CAMP LIMITED
-City of North York, Don River Watershed
Mr. Jeffery S. Lyons of Fogler, Fubinoff, Barristers & Solicitors and Mr. Bert Fine of Forest Valley
Day Camp Limited, spoke to the recommendation before the Committee on the above quoted item.
B113 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993
DELEGATIONS (CONTD.)
(b) THE DONALDA GOLF CLUB
-To place fill in a regulated area, on Part Lot 8, Concession 3 WYS, (Don Mills/York
Mills Road), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed.
Res. #E95/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Richard O'Brien
THAT the following delegation requesting to speak to the above quoted permit application be
heard: Jeffery Shortt, Lee Shortt, David Yonge and Cora Urbel, all being area residents; and Brian
Sparks and Paul Scenna of Donalda Golf Club.
AND FURTHER THAT Alistair Gorman of Peto MacCallum Ltd. be available to answer questions.
CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. BELL CANADA
- Request for permanent easement for Bell Canada telephone equipment east of Clarence
Street, north of Wycliffe Avenue, in the Woodbridge area of the City of Vaughan
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from Bell Canada to provide a permanent easement for Bell Canada telephone
equipment located east of Clarence Street, north of Wycliffe Avenue in the Woodbridge area of the
City of Vaughan.
Res. #E96/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a
request from Bell Canada to provide a permanent easement for Bell Canada telephone equipment
located east of Clarence Street, north of Wycliffe Avenue in the Woodbridge area of the City of
Vaughan;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interest of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate
with Bell Canada in this instance;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 B114
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. BELL CANADA (CONTD.)
- Request for permanent easement for Bell Canada telephone equipment east of Clarence
Street, north of Wycliffe Avenue, in the Woodbridge area of the City of Vaughan
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.005 hectares (0.012 acres), more or less, be granted to
Bell Canada for Bell Canada telephone equipment, said land being Part of Block 114, Plan 65M-
2023, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, designated as Part 1 on Plan 65R- 16351;
THAT consideration is to be the sum of $2,755.00, together with the carrying out of landscaping
work to the satisfaction of the Authority at the expense of Bell Canada, provision of suitable
liability insurance coverage, payment of Authority's legal costs and any other conditions deemed
appropriate by the Authority's solicitor;
THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
AMENDMENT Moved by: Brian Harrison
Res. #E97/93 Seconded by: Richard O'Brien
THAT only existing equipment on the easement be approved and should further equipment be
required, Executive Committee approval would be required.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The subject lands were acquired from 419540 Ontario Ltd. (Seaton Development Ltd.) in April,
1982, under the Humber River Flood Plain Lands Component of the Land Acquisition Project.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the funding obtained from this easement be utilized for the purchase of other
high priority flood plain, valley, Lake Ontario Shoreline and Greenspace properties under the Land
Acquisition Project.
B115 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION
COMPONENT
- Duffins Creek Watershed, Dekkema Gervais Development Corporation
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located north of Main Street, west of Mill Street in the Stouffville area of the
Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville under "Land Acquisition Project - 1987 - 1991" - Flood Plain and
Conservation Component - Duffins Creek Watershed.
Res. #E98/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.5 acres, more or Tess, be purchased from
Dekkema Gervais Development Corporation, said land being an irregular shaped parcel of land being
Part of Lot 1, Concession 9, Part of Block A, Registered Plan 61 and Part of Lot 46, Registered
Plan 70, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, Regional Municipality of York, consisting of land situate
north of Main Street west of Mill Street in the Stouffville area of the Town;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus Vendor's legal costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #51, Authority Meeting #3, May 2, 1986, approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The funds of this purchase will be charged to Account 004-11-502 - Flood Control Hazard
Account.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 5116
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF CALEDON
- Request for a permanent easement for an overflow channel, north of Old King Road, Bolton
area of the Town of Caledon
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from the Corporation of the Town of Caledon to provide a permanent
easement for an overflow channel located north of Old King Road, Bolton area of the Town of
Caledon.
Res. #E99/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a
request from the Corporation of the Town of Caledon to provide a permanent easement for an
overflow channel located north of Old King Road, in the Bolton area of the Town of Caledon;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interest of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate
with the Corporation of the Town of Caledon in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.150 hectares (0.371 acres), more or less, be granted to
the Corporation of the Town of Caledon for an overflow channel, said land being Part of Block A,
Plan 973, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, designated as Part 1 on a Plan of Survey
prepared by Young & Young Surveying Inc. under their Project 93- B2279 -1;
THAT consideration is to be the sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Corporation of the Town of Caledon has conveyed lands to the Authority over the years for the
nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that this easement be granted for the nominal
consideration of $2.00. The Corporation of the Town of Caledon has agreed to assume all legal,
survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction.
The subject lands were acquired form Maria, Renata & Gino Bifolchi and Known Construction Co.
Ltd. in June, 1986, under the Humber River Flood Plain Lands Component of the Land Acquisition
Project.
B117 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. RESTORATION OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS
-Cold Creek at King Road, Township of King
KEY ISSUE
Resolution of the restoration of Authority owned lands in the Nashville Resource Management '
Tract, resulting from damages caused by Bell Canada on Authority owned lands, south of the King
Road, in the vicinity of Cold Creek in the Township of King.
Res. #E100/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMW'.DS TF the sum of 522,000, offered by Bell Canada
as payment for work necessary to resolve damages caused by Bell Canada on Authority owned
lands, south of King Road in the vicinity of Cold Creek in the Township of King be accepted;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to carry out this restoration work on Authority owned lands
at the earliest opportunity in 1993.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
During late summer and early fall of 1990, Bell Canada, while carrying out construction within the
limits of an existing municipal road allowance, trespassed on adjacent Authority owned lands and
caused substantial damage to the Authority holdings, including causing a substantial amount of
sedimentation to fall into the Cold Creek watercourse. Cold Creek is a tributary of the Humber
River. A copy of letter dated 1990.10.16. from Bell Canada was sent with the Agenda. It
illustrates the extent of the problem and the acknowledgment by Bell Canada that it was Bell's
responsibility to rectify the problem.
Since receipt of the letter of 1990.10.16., numerous meetings have been held involving Authority
staff with representatives of Bell Canada, the contractor involved, insurers of Bell Canada and their
consultants. One of the main reasons for the delay in receiving a suitable settlement was that each
of the other parties involved was claiming it was the other parties responsibility to settle with the
Authority.
During early 1993, senior staff of Bell Canada and their legal staff again acknowledged that Bell
Canada was at fault in this instance and that Bell should settle the issue and resolve matters with
its contractor and insurers later. One of the problems in this instance is that the actual restoration
caused to the immediate area is limited with the substantial additional damage being caused to the
environment by the sedimentation allowed to fall into the creek.
The compensation at hand will allow restoration of all damaged areas, together with riparian
revegetation to take place. Certain stream bank stabilization works will also be carried out, as well
as fence repairs and general improvements.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 B118
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. RESTORATION OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS (CONTD.)
-Cold Creek at King Road, Township of King
RATIONALE
Given the long history of the issue, staff is of the opinion that acceptance of this mometary offer 'is
the best way to resolve this matter. Staff is satisfied that the amount of $22,000. is adequate to
address all aspects of the work required, to correct the damages caused and rehabilitate the
watercourse. It is proposed that Authority staff would carry out the required work, which will
ensure that it is done satisfactory. This will also eliminate the need for staff to oversee outside
contactors working on Authority lands.
5. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION
COMPONENT
- Michael William and Mary Anatasia Riley Property, Rouge River Watershed
KEY ISSUE
Availability for purchase of property located at 57 Main Street, Markham under Land Acquisition
Project 1987 - 1991 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed.
Res. #E101/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Executive Committee consider this item in closed session.
The board rose from closed session.
Res. #E102/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
CARRIED
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT on the basis that the Town of Markham
agrees to pay a minimum of 50% of the purchase price and that the Province of Ontario agrees to
pay a minimum of 50% of the purchase price, 9.1 acres, more of less, consisting of an irregular
shaped parcel of land improved with a split level aluminum siding house with an attached one car
garage and a detached double wood frame garage be purchased from Michael William and Mary
Anatasia Riley, said lands being Part of Lot 9, Concession 8, Town of Markham, Regional
Municipality of York, known municipally as 57 Main Street;
THAT the purchase price be $495,000;
B119 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION
COMPONENT (CONTD.)
- Michael William and Mary Anatasia Riley Property, Rouge River Watershed
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction. All
reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing fo: land transfer tax, legal costs and
disbursements are to be paid;
THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary
documentation;
AND FURTHER THAT upon completion of the acquisition by the Authority, the lands be placed
under Management Ar•- eement with the Town of Markham for parks and conservation purposes.
6. MEMBERSHIP TO THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO
Re- appointment of James W. Keenan
KEY ISSUE
The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto appoints members for a three year term.
Res. #E103/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
CARRIED
Lois Hancey
Brian Harrison
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the membership of James W. Keenan be
renewed for a further three -year term, May 26, 1993 to May 26, 1996.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND .
"UPON MOTION duly made by G. W. Patterson and seconded by J. A. McGinnis, IT WAS
UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED THAT J. W. Keenan continue as a member of The Conservation
Foundation of Greater Toronto for further three year term, May 29, 1993, to May 29, 1996,
subject to the necessary approval of the Authority."
This recommendation was approved by the board of The Conservation Foundation of Greater
Toronto on Wednesday, May 26, 1993. Approval is now being requested to comply with the
guidelines set out in the Conservation Foundation's Charter and By -Laws.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 B120
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
7. THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL
- Request for a permanent easement for a sanitary sewer, north of Old King Road in the
Bolton area of the Town of Caledon
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The Regional Municipality of Peel to provide a permanent easement for a
sanitary sewer located north of Old King Road, in the Bolton area of the Town of Caledon.
Res. #E104/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a
request from The Regional Municipality of Peel to provide a permanent easement for a sanitary
sewer located north of Old King Road, in the Bolton area of the Town of Caledon;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interest of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co- operate
with The Regional Municipality of Peel in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.030 hectares (0.074 acres), more or less, be granted to
The Regional Municipality of Peel for a sanitary sewer, said land being Part of Lot 14, Block 1, Plan
BOL -7, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, designated as Part 2 on a Plan of Survey
prepared by Young & Young Surveying Inc. under their Project 93- B2279 -1;
THAT consideration is to be the sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Regional Municipality of Peel has conveyed lands to the Authority over the years for the
nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that this easement be granted for the nominal
consideration of $2.00. The Regional Municipality of Peel has agreed to assume all legal, survey
and other costs involved in completing this transaction.
The subject lands were acquired form Maria, Renata & Gino Bifolchi and Known Construction Co.
Ltd. in June 1986 under the Humber River Flood Plain Lands Component of the Land Acquisition
Project.
B121 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993'
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. REQUEST FOR EXCHANGE OF LANDS IN THE SCARBOROUGH SECTOR OF THE LAKE
ONTARIO WATERFRONT
KEY ISSUE
Status report on the processing of a request for exchange of lands from Gwen Agboat, concerning
463 Guildwood Parkway and Authority lands at 139 Sylvan Avenue on the Scarborough Bluffs.
Res. #E105/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THAT the staff report dated 1993.06.29., concerning a request for exchange of lands in the
Scarborough sector of the Lake Ontario Waterfront be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to continue with the public process for the potential
disposal of lands at this location, in accordance with Authority policy, and report further to the
Executive Committee concerning this matter at a future date.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Since the adoption of Authority Resolution #A62/93, April 23, 1993, the following action has been
taken:
(a) The proposed exchange has been reviewed with officials of the City of Scarborough and a
lett9r dated May 26, 1993, has been received;
(b) A public meeting concerning Shoreline Protection Works in the Sylvan Avenue area of the
City of Scarborough, was held on June 2, 1993. At the meeting, which was held at 166
Sylvan Avenue, owners to the immediate east of 139 Sylvan Avenue expressed a concern
with the potential of the residence currently on the property being relocated and a portion
of the property being returned to private ownership.
(c) Authority technical staff have reviewed the Authority holding at 139 Sylvan Avenue and
feel that there is a sufficient portion of the property that can be disposed of to create a
residential lot with the slope land and a sufficient tableland buffer still being retained in
Authority ownership.
RATIONALE
In view of the interest expressed by residents in the area, it is suggested that while the land
exchange currently proposed may ultimately be in the best interests of the Authority, that
additional public input should be sought through the public land disposal process prior to a
recommendation for disposal being made.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 B122 .
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. MCMICHAEL CANADIAN ART COLLECTION
KEY ISSUE
The status of the McMichael Canadian Art Collection under the Environmental Assessment Act.
Res. #E106/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Lorna Jackson
THAT the Authority advise the McMichael Canadian Art Collection of its continuing interest in any
proposal for expansion and of its concerns for potential negative impacts on the Humber River
valley corridor;
AND FURTHER THAT the McMichael Canadian Art Collection be requested to consider the
Authority's policies and objectives for the management of the valley and stream corridors in their
revisions to their expansion plans.
AMENDMENT
Res. #E107/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Lois Griffin
THAT the Province of Ontario be requested to make the funding for any addition to the McMichael
Canadian Art Collection subject to the requirement that the McMichael Canadian Art Collection be
made to comply with Ontario Regulation 158.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At its meeting #7/91, the full Authority received a report and recommendations from the Water and
Related Land Management Advisory Board respecting a proposal by the McMichael Canadian Art
Collection to expand its facilities by an addition which would encroach significantly into the valley
of the Humber River. In this connection, the Authority adopted the resolution #238/91, as follows:
"IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board
advise the Authority that the proposal to extend the McMichael Canadian Act Collection
affects the Authority's interests only with respect to the siting of the preferred alternative;
THAT the preferred siting alternative does not conform to the Authority's programs and
policies as stated in the Watershed Plan and the Greenspace Strategy;
THAT the Environmental Assessment Act and its regulations provide for the granting of
exemptions and are the appropriate mechanisms for determining the overall merit of the
proposal in that they can weigh not only the Authority's policies for the natural environment
but also cultural, social, economic and community interests expressed by other ministries,
agencies and the public;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to convey this information to the McMichael
Canadian Art Collection and to the Minister of the Environment."
B123 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. MCMICHAEL CANADIAN ART COLLECTION (CONTD.)
The proposal to extend McMichael affects the Authority's interests as the siting of the preferred
alternative does not conform to the Authority's programs and policies for the maintenance of valley
and stream corridors as natural, green, open space areas nor with the current practice of the
Authority in taking a non - structural approach to the management of slope stability. It conflicts
substantially with the proposals of the "Draft Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program ".
The Authority was forwarded and asked to address this proposal under the Environmental
Assessment Act on the assumption that McMichael was subject to the requirements of the Act. In
commenting, it was assumed that, as "an agent of the Crown ", McMichael was exempt from the
Authority's requirements under Ontario Regulation 158.
The Ministry of the Environment and Energy (MOEE) has recently forwarded to the Authority a
copy of correspondence to McMichael containing reference to the Environmental Assessment Act
and an interpretation that, while McMichael is defined in its legislation as "an agent of Her Majesty"
it is not "a public body" and is, therefore, exempt from the requirements of the Environmental
Assessment Act.
Subsequently, we received a copy of correspondence from McMichael to the MOEE that McMichael
will be "proceeding with a project revision to reduce the scale of the project in Tight of economic
realities ".
As noted in our previous communications, it has been our past experience that other "agents of the
Crown ", for example Provincial Ministries, while exempt from the requirements of the Authority's
Ontario Regulation 158, have made it a practice to comply with our requirements. It would be
timely to reiterate our concerns to the McMichael Canadian Art Collection requesting their
recognition of our policies and objectives for the valley and stream corridors under our jurisdiction
and request that they forward their revised plans to us for review.
10. KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION
- Acid Rain Aquaria Display
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of an Aquaria Display to enhance the Kortright Centre for Conservation's Acid Rain
Exhibit.
Res. #E108/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Lois Griffin
THAT the quotation from Aquatic Designs for the supply and delivery for an Aquaria Display at the
Kortright Centre for Conservation, in the total amount of $ 11,379. including all taxes, be accepted,
it being the quotation that provides the best quality equipment and the company having the most
extensive qualifications and experience.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 B124
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION (CONTD.)
- Acid Rain Aquaria Display
BACKGROUND
In 1987, The W. Garfield Weston Foundation provided funds for the establishment of an Acid Rain
Exhibit at the Kortright Centre for Conservation. In order to enhance this exhibit, staff developed a
concept for an Aquaria Exhibit and prepared Terms of Reference and invited quotations from eleven
Aquarium companies.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Four Aquaria are to be installed complete with glass tanks, aquascaping and plants, filters, lights,
chiller and accessories necessary for keeping live feeder fish. One aquarium will show the habitat
and fish of an acid - stressed lake. A second will show the habitat and fish of Cold Creek and the
east branch of the Humber River at the Kortright Centre. A third aquarium will show the habitat
and fish of Lake Ontario along the Metro waterfront and a fourth tank will hold live feeder fish.
This Aquaria Display, in the Acid Rain Exhibit, will provide for a new dimension that will enhance
Kortright visitors' experience. It will provide the opportunity to describe the Authority's
accomplishments in fish habitat development along the Lake Ontario Waterfront and in inland
streams through the Clean Up Rural Beaches program.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Three companies responded to the invitation for quotation.
Aquarium Consultants -
Aquatic Designs
Art d'Eau
$ 10,333.
$ 11,379.
$ 24,725.
Staff are recommending Aquatic Designs because this proposal can accommodate all fish species
requested in the proposal call. It offers a superior filter system (lower maintenance) and a superior
lighting systems including quartz lights for better fish colour and automatic timers. Staff believe it
is necessary to contract aquarium maintenance for the first 12 months in order to learn proper
operation and how to diagnose and treat any problems that arise. Unlike the lowest quotation,
Aquatic Designs can provide regular maintenance.
Sufficient funds remain from the original W. Garfield Weston Foundation Grant for the Acid Rain
Display to cover all costs associated with this Aquaria Display. The Weston Foundation has been
contacted and has approved this proposal.
B125 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL, VAUGHAN
- Referral to Ontario Municipal Board
KEY ISSUE
To provide a status update on the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing in the matter of a referral
by Marbloom Investments Ltd. and Wilderton Investments Ltd. to settle and determine terms and
conditions of a site plan and zoning by -law amendment for the development of lands comprising of
Lots 28 and 29, Concession 8, in the City of Vaughan to permit a 27 hole golf course (Crooked
Creek Golf Course) which affects, in part, the valleylands of the East Branch of the Humber River.
Res. #E109/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Jackson
Lois Hancey
THAT staff continue to prepare for the Ontario Municipal Board hearing scheduled to reconvene on
January 17, 1994 with legal representation from the firm of Gardiner, Roberts;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Executive Committee on the outcome of the Ontario
Municipal Board hearing.
BACKGROUND
At Executive Committee Me.
Res. #E85/93
, 1993, June 11, 1993 the following was resolved:
CARRIED
THAT staff prepare to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing scheduled for June 14,
1993 with legal representation from the firm of Gardiner, Roberts seeking an adjournment
of the hearing, failing which a refusal of the applications would be pursued;
THAT the forested lands comprising Lots 28 and 29, Concession 8 in the City of
Vaughan, be formally designated as an Environmentally Significant Area (ESA)
based on existing MTRCA criteria 3, 5 and 6; and, that staff determine the
boundary of the ESA through the 1993 ESA Update Study;
THAT the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and the City of Vaughan be requested to
recognize the Environmentally Significant Area within their appropriate planning
documents;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Executive Committee on the outcome
of the Ontario Municipal Board hearing.
CARRIED"
STATUS
On June 14, 1993, staff attended the OMB hearing with legal representation from the firm of
Gardiner, Roberts seeking an adjournment to the hearing. Also present at this hearing were the
Ministry of Natural Resources and City of Vaughan.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 B126
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL, VAUGHAN (CONTD.)
- Referral to Ontario Municipal Board
The Board heard two motions: one by the MTRCA to have the hearing adjourned and one by the
applicant to have the matter of the site plan deferred pending a decision on the rezoning of the
property.
It was the decision of the Board that there were merits in adjourning the hearing given the number
of witnesses to be heard and that only five days had been scheduled. The Board did not, however,
support the motion of the appellant to deal with the matters of the site plan separately from the
rezoning application. Rather, they felt a finalized site plan should result from the hearing.
The Board directed all parties involved in the hearing to meet and identify a list of technical reports
and information which would need to be exchanged and reviewed prior to reconvening. This list
was compiled and the Board directed the appellant to file their reports by no later than October 31,
1993, and the respondents to file theirs by December 15, 1993. The hearing has now been
scheduled to reconvene on January 17, 1994 for four weeks.
Specific to the designation of the forested lands associated with this property as an
Environmentally Significant Area, the owners requested that the consideration of this item be
deferred to Authority Meeting #6/93 on July 23, 1993 at which time they would appear as a
delegation (copy of letter attached). The Authority agreed to the deferral at Meeting #5/93, June
25, 1993. Staff will report on the ESA designation at that meeting.
12. APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS
- January to May 1993
KEY ISSUE
Request for approval of the accounts for January to May 1993.
Res. #E110/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
THAT expenditures for the months of January to May of 1993, in the amount of $9,880,500, be
approved.
CARRIED
B127 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
13. STATUS REPORT ON PERMIT APPLICATION #129/92/MISS
- Felice and Gemma Iannace (2069 Burnhamthorpe Road East, City of Mississauga,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed)
KEY ISSUE
A status report for Ontario Regulation 158 permit application 129/92/MISS, by Felice and Gemma
Iannace has been prepared as directed by the Executive Committee at Meeting #9/92,
November 13, 1992.
Res. #E111/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
THAT the status report for Ontario Regulation 158 permit application 129/92/MISS by Felice and
Gemma Iannace be received for information;
AND FURTHER THAT staff continue to report on a six month basis until such time as the work is
complete.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Application #129/92/MISS was approved with amendments by the Executive Committee at
Meeting #9/92, November 13, 1992; however, the issuance of the permit was on hold subject to
specified conditions being fulfilled, as follows:
Res. #199
THAT permit application, Agenda Item 13(f), Felice and Gemma Iannace, to construct in the
Regional Storm flood plain and regrading in a fill regulated area, at 2069 Burnhamthorpe
Road East, in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed, be approved, in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Development P /an; Drawing No. S.P. -1; prepared by John D. Rogers and
Associates Inc.; dated January 15, 1992; as revised October 27, 1992.
(2) Site Services; Drawing No. SS1; prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd.;
dated November 3/92.
(3) "Structural Review for Flood Conditions" Report; prepared by Bake Engineering Inc.,
Structural Engineers; dated June 2, 1992.
(4) Architectural Plans; Drawing Nos. 1 and 2; prepared by Stephen Bernatt, Architect
Inc.; dated September 27, 1989; as revised September, 1992 and August, 1992
respectively and issued by Sabourin Kimble and Associates Ltd. September 24,
1992.
(5) Landscape Restoration and Pedestrian Path; Drawing No. LR -1; prepared by Baker
Salmona Associates Ltd.; dated October, 1992; as received November 2, 1992.
(6) Landscape Plan; Drawing No. L -1; prepared by Baker Salmona Associates Ltd.;
dated October, 1992; as received October 28, 1992.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 B128
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
13. STATUS REPORT ON PERMIT APPLICATION #129/92/MISS (CONTD.)
- Felice and Gemma Iannace (2069 Burnhamthorpe Road East, City of Mississauga,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed)
(7) Details; Drawing No. L -2; prepared by Baker Salmona Associates Ltd,; dated
October, 1992, as received October 28, 1992.
SUBJECT TO:
No permit is to be issued unless and until the following agreements, as referred to in the
staff report, with the City of Mississauga and the applicants and the Authority have been
signed by the City of Mississauga and the applicants and the Authority:
(1) Encroachment Agreement
(2) License Agreement
(3) Site Development Plan Agreement
(4) Land Exchange & Dedication Agreement
(5) Save Harmless Agreement
(6) Right of First Refusal To Purchase Agreement (Only Agreement Authority to Sign)
AND FURTHER THAT the firm of Gardiner, Roberts, counsel for the Authority, be directed
to withdraw the Authority's appeal from the Provincial Offenses Court related to violations
pursuant to Ontario Regulation 293/86 connected with the subject application, upon
satisfactory evidence that the agreements referred to above have been signed by the
lannaces and have been delivered to the City of Mississauga for execution.
AMENDMENT #1 Res. #200
THAT staff prepare a progress report for the consideration of the Executive Committee in
June of 1993.
AMENDMENT #2 Res. #201
THAT the City of Mississauga be requested to require appropriate letters of credit from
Felice and Gemma Iannace.
STATUS
In accordance with Resolution #199, the Authority, represented by the firm of Gardiner, Roberts,
withdrew its appeal from the Provincial Offenses Court related to violations pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 (formally Ontario Regulation 293/86) connected with the subject application upon
receipt of confirmation that the above noted agreements had been executed by the applicants and
had been filed with the City of Mississauga.
To date the permit has not been issued. Authority staff has been working closely with staff at the
City of Mississauga to ensure that the site plan approval is in compliance with the terms and
conditions of the approved Ontario Regulation 158 permit application. The site plan approval
process is nearing completion. We expect to receive the final plans from the City within six weeks.
We will be reviewing them for compliance before final site plan approval is granted.
B129 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993
SECTION I1 - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
13. STATUS REPORT ON PERMIT APPLICATION #129/92/MISS (CONTD.)
- Felice and Gemma lannace (2069 Burnhamthorpe Road East, City of Mississauga,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed)
Enforcement staff has confirmed that no work has commenced in connection with the permit
application.
In November 1992 and January 1993, Mississauga Council enacted by -laws to execute the
agreements noted above. Registration of these applicable agreements against title was deferred
until such time as the site plan was ready for approval. This is expected to occur shortly, just prior
to final site plan approval. It is our understanding that the land exchange and dedication and
licensing has already transpired.
In a letter dated February 16, 1993, City staff advised that letters of credit would be received for
100% of the landscape works as shown on the approved landscape plan plus an additional
55,000.00 for tree preservation and securities for the construction of a centre left turn lane on
Burnhamthorpe Road West and grading /topsoiling /sodding of the boulevard across the frontage of
the site. Authority staff will evaluate this list as part of our compliance review to integrate
Authority interests wherever possible.
City staff also advised that the dual bulk lift enclosure as shown in the Detail Plan received from
the MTRCA will be included as part of the approved landscape plans. This was requested to
manage the "aesthetics" of the outside garbage area from views east of the Etobicoke Creek.
14. REQUEST FOR USE OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS BY FOREST VALLEY DAY CAMP
LIMITED
-City of North York, Don River Watershed
KEY ISSUE
The Authority is in receipt of a request from Forest Valley Day Camp Limited (Bathurst Manor Day
Camp & Swim Club Limited) to extend an existing lease arrangement made at the time of
acquisition which is currently scheduled to terminate on November 1, 1993.
Res. #E112/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lois Hancey
THAT the staff report dated July 2, 1993, relating to the request by Forest Valley Day Camp
Limited (Bathurst Manor Day Camp & Swim Club Limited) be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to discuss this matter further with officials of The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, the North York Board of Education and, if appropriate, Forest
Valley Day Camp Limited, and to report further to the Executive Committee at its meeting
scheduled for August 13, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 B130
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. REQUEST FOR USE OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS BY FOREST VALLEY DAY CAMP
LIMITED (CONTD.)
-City of North York, Don River Watershed
AMENDMENT Moved by: Richard O'Brien
Res. #E113/93 Seconded by: Lois Hancey
THAT in negotiation, staff attempt to obtain a head lease on this property.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The subject property containing 16.629 acres, together with substantial improvements, was
acquired by the Authority on December 29, 1987, at a purchase price of $3,500,000. plus the
Vendor's costs, together with certain lease rights in favour of the Vendor on the property until
November 1, 1993 at a rental rate of $ 18,000. per year.
The property at the time of acquisition was also subject to an existing lease dated September 4,
1984, in favour of The Board of Education for the City of North York expiring June 30, 1994, at a
rental rate of $90,000. per year.
Since completion of the acquisition in 1987, discussions have been underway with officials of The
Board of Education for the City of North York concerning renegotiation of their lease. In March,
1991, it was brought to the attention of the Members of the Executive Committee of the Authority
that the Board was interested in the potential purchase of all or a portion of the subject property.
Staff at that time were requested to review the matter further and report back to the Members of
the Executive Committee at a future date.
After several meetings with officials of The Board of Education for the City of North York and The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, it was agreed that a lease arrangement with the School Board
would be preferable since it would meet both the Authority's and Metropolitan Toronto Parks and
Property Department's open space objectives and also meet the needs of the School Board.
The School Board was asked to develop a plan based on their needs for land area and their present
and future building needs. Based on discussions with the School Board, the Authority received
from the Board of Education at a meeting held on April 21, 1993, a set of plans which identifies
their requirement for the leasing of approximately 5 acres of the subject property to meet their
ultimate objectives. The Board has indicated as well that they will only require possession of the
property for a 10 month period each year and do not require the use of the property during the
summer months of July and August. The Board also provided the Authority and Metro officials
with mapping which illustrates the five acres and their short and long term needs regarding the use
of the buildings which are on the site now. Copies of these maps are attached and are titled as
follows:
(1) Site Plan - Existing: Illustrating all buildings, portables and pools currently on the
property being used either for school board purposes or the summer operation of
the Forest Valley Day Camp Limited;
B131 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 .
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. REQUEST FOR USE OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS BY FOREST VALLEY DAY CAMP
LIMITED (CONTD.)
-City of North York, Don River Watershed
(2) Site Plan - Preliminary Phase 1: Illustrating the area proposed to be leased by the
Board including the main educational building which is to be retained and showing
other smaller improvements ultimately suitable for removal but required to be used
by the Board on an interim basis until a second permanent educational building
could be constructed and the long term plan of the Board implemented. It was
proposed the few existing improvements required to be retained beyond the new
lease area in the interim would be utilized under a short term licence agreement;
(3) Site Plan - Phase 2: Illustrating the ultimate plan of The Board consolidating all
building requirements within the proposed long term lease area. The plans of The
Board include construction of a new one - storey 6,000 square foot building on the
westerly portion of leased lands to be constructed at some future date.
A copy of an extract from the Authority flood line mapping of the area was available for the
information at the meeting.
During this time, the Authority and The Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department were
made aware of a request by Forest Valley Day Camp Limited to continue to operate a day camp
beyond the negotiated date at the time of purchase, being November 1, 1993.
Forest Valley Day Camp Ltd. was advised that negotiations were under way with the North York
Board of Education for the extension of their lease to enable the continuation of their outdoor
education programs. It was suggested that once these negotiations were complete, that the
Authority and Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department would discuss what
possibilities might exist for any lease extension.
At a meeting held at the Authority office on May 13, 1993, representatives of Forest Valley Day
Camp Limited were advised that Authority staff were prepared to consider an arrangement to
potentially accommodate their needs during the summer months if the day camp uses could be
confined to the lands potentially being made be available for long term lease to The Board of
Education for the City of North York.
Representatives of Forest Valley Day Camp Limited were reminded that the Authority had originally
purchased the property for conservation greenspace protection and for regional park purposes. It
was suggested however that if the day camp operation could be confined to the reduced area, that
consideration for an extended lease could be given.
By letter dated May 28,1993, Mr. Jeffery Lyons outlines Forest Valley Day Camp Limited's
proposal which does not reflect the staff proposal and requests a 5 -year extension to the existing
lease on the entire property.
By letter dated June 23,1993, Mr. Lyons requested the opportunity to present his proposal to the
Executive Committee. Staff have recommended that Mr. Lyons' proposal on behalf of the Forest
Valley Day Camp be received and that they be directed to discuss the proposal further with officials
of the Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department.
It has been the position of Metro Parks and Property throughout all discussions that any extended
leases to the Board of Education or Forest Valley Day Camp Limited must be at current market rent.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 B132 •
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(i) The Donalda Golf Club
To place fill in a regulated area, on Part Lot 8, Concession 3 WYS, (Don Mills/York
Mills Road), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed.
Res. #E114/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Jackson
Lois Hancey
THAT the request for permit application by The Donalda Golf Club be deferred to a Hearing prior to
Executive Committee Meeting #6/93, August 13, 1993.
Res. #E115/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
CARRIED
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THAT the permit applications listed herein as (a) to (o) inclusive and added permit applications (p)
to (r) inclusive, with the exception of (i), be approved, in accordance to the information contained
within the reports.
CARRIED
(a) The Regional Municipality of Peel - Department of Public Works
To alter a waterway, on Part Lots 3 and 20, Concessions 6 EHS and 1 (Albion),
(Centreville Creek and Airport Road - Hamlet of Caledon East), in the Town of
Caledon, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan View and Typical Cross - Section Drawings; submitted by the Regional Municipality of
Peel; dated May 26, 1993, and received on June 2, 1993.
(b) ABS Machining Limited
To construct within the flood plain, on Part Lot 5, Concession 1 ND, (1495
Sedlescomb Drive), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Yuoriane Engineering Ltd.; Drawing No.s A -1, A -2, A -3, S -1 and S -2;
revised on April 19, 1993, and received on May 20, 1993.
B133 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(c) Ken McLean
To place fill within a regulated area, on Lot 4, Registered Plan 2761, (40 Delroy
Drive), in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Retaining Wall Plan; prepared by E. DiNorscia of Delco Building Products Ltd; Drawing No.
1,; dated May 20, 1993 and received on May 28, 1993.
(d) The City of Etobicoke - Works Department
To place fill within a regulated area, on Disco Road at Highway #427, in the City of
Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by the City of Etobicoke - Works Department; Drawing No.s PDB - 1886;
Sheet No. 2 and PDB -1886, Sheet No. 3; dated March 1, 1993; received June 25, 1993.
(2) Standard Sediment Control Fence Detail; Figure No. 9; received June 25, 1993.
je) To Bac -Srenq
To construct a garage, on Lot 33, Registered Plan M -668, (125 Chelwood Road), in
the City of Scarborough, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan for 125 Chelwood Road, Lot 33, Scarborough; received May 25, 1993.
(f) Robert and Lois Ball
To place fill, on Lot 125, Registered Plan 2383, (175 Elmwood Avenue), in the
Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan for 175 Elmwood Avenue; prepared by applicant; Figure 1; received June 21,
1993.
(2) Cross Sections, South Boundary North Boundary; prepared by applicant; Figures 2 and 3;
received June 21, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 B134
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(a) Harbourview Investments Ltd.
To alter a watercourse, on Part Lots 6 & 7, Concession 7, (Old King Road), in the
Town of Caledon (Albion), Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Falby Burnside and Associates; Job No. 8618; Drawing No. DS, Revision
5; dated November 9, 1992; Drawing DG, Revision No. 1, dated June 30, 1992; Drawing
No. D7, Revision 1, dated July 9, 1992.
(2) Plans; prepared by Alexander Budrevics and Associates; Project No. 921 -592; Drawing No.
L1, dated August 7, 1992; Drawing L2, dated August 7, 1992.
(h) J. and S. Boultbee ,
To place fill in a regulated area on Lot 19, Registered Plan 3939, (63 Valecrest
Drive), in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Jurgen Partridge Ltd.; dated June 30, 1993.
(2) Revised Plan and Section; prepared by Jurgen Partridge Ltd.; dated July 6, 1993.
(1) The Black Creek Project
To alter a watercourse, on Lot 2, Registered Plan 3147, (Trethewey Drive at Black
Creek Drive), in the City of York, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by The Black Creek Project; Drawing No.s 1, 2 & 3; dated July 6, 1993;
received July 7, 1993.
(k) The Regional Municipality of York
To replace an existing failing culvert through construction of a precast concrete
bridge, on Part Lot 27, Concession 8, (York Durham Line, 2.5 km. north of Major
Mackenzie Drive), on the boundary line of the Municipalities of Markham and
Pickering, Duffin Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Cross- sectional and Sediment Control Details; Prepared by The Regional Municipality of
York; received on May 31, 1993.
(2) Site Plan and Enhancement Details; prepared by The Regional Municipality of York; revised
as received on June 30, 1993.
B135 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(I) The Regional Municipality of York
To reconstruct an existing two lane bridge to accommodate the widening of
Woodbine Ave., on Part Lots 14 and 15, Concessions 3 and 4, (Woodbine Avenue
between Highway 7 and 16th Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Woodbine Ave. Widening, Bridge Construction Removal and Details; Prepared by Totten
Sims Hubicki Associates; Drawing No.s P- 1000 -67; Contract No. 93 -02; Sheet No.s 2, 4,
5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 20, & 33; revised as received on May 7, 1993.
(2) Sediment Control Details at Bridge Crossing; prepared by The Regional Municipality of York;
Drawing No.s 1 - 3; received on July 7, 1993.
(3) Woodbine Avenue Planting Plan and Details; prepared by Totten Sims Hubicki Associates;
Contract No. 93 -02; Drawing No. P- 1000 -67; Sheet No. 14; revised as received on July 6,
1993.
(m) The Regional Municipality of York
To construct two stormwater outfalls, on Part Lots 45 & 46, Concession 1 WYS,
(Major Mackenzie Drive - Bathurst Street to Trench Street), in the Town of
Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Major Mackenzie Drive, New Construction Plan; prepared by The Regional Municipality of
York; Contract #93 -09; Drava P- 1077 -33, Sheet #X received June 3, 1993; Sheet #10,
received June 10, 1993 and _its #12 and 14, received June 24, 1993.
(n) The Regional Municipality of York
To alter a watercourse, on Lots 21 -35, Concessions 2 & 3 in the City of Vaughan;
and Lots 1 -6, Concession 2 and 3, in the Town of King, (Dufferin Street between
Major Mackenzie Drive and King Road) Don River and Humber River Watersheds.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Drawings; prepared by Totten, Sims, Hubicki; Project No. P- 1044 -13; Contract No. 93.01;
Sheet No.s 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 22, 30, 33, 34, 36, 38, 39, 46, 47, 48, 52,
53, 54, 55 and 56; received June 25, 1993.
(2) Letter of undertaking from J.A. Ireland, P.Eng., Commissioner of Transportation; Regional
Municipality of York; dated June 29, 1993; as amended June 30, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/93, JULY 9, 1993 B136
SECTION II - ITEM FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(o) The Town of Richmond Hill
To place fill, on Part Lot 47, Concession 1 WYS, (290 Mill Street), in the Town of
Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan and Siltation Protection Proposed Pump House Demolition; prepared by the Town
of Richmond Hill, revised as received June 21, 1993.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:30 p.m., July 9, 1993.
William B. Granger J. Craig Mather
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
/bb.
Woking Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
minutes
AUGUST 13, 1993
B137
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #6/93
The Executive Committee met at the Authority office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday,
August 13, 1993. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
Res. #E116/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Committee sit as a Hearing Board.
PRESENT FOR HEARING:
HEARING
Lois Hancey
Lois Griffin
CARRIED
Chair William Granger
Vice -Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
Richard O'Brien
Jim Witty
The Donalda Golf Club
Application #111/93/NY pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 by The Donalda Golf Club to
place fill within a regulated area, on Part Lot 8, Concession 3 WYS (Don Mills/York Mills
Road), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed.
A staff presentation was made by John Maletich, Manager, Regulation Administration, Water
Resource Division.
Carla Urbel, President of the Don Mills Residents' Association spoke for the residents in support of
the revised permit application by The Donalda Golf Club.
B138 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
DECISION OF HEARING BOARD
That the application by The Donald Golf Club, pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, to place fill
within a regulated area, on Part Lot 8, Concession 3 WYS (Don Mills/York Mills Road), in the City
of North York, Don River Watershed, be approved.
Res. #E117/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Executive Committee Meeting reconvene.
Lois Hancey
Lois Griffin
CARRIED
PRESENT FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: C' William Granger
V. .lair Lois Hancey
M ers Lois Griffin
Lorna Jackson
Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
Jim Witty
ABSENT Paul Palleschi
MINUTES
Res. #E118/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #5/93 be approved.
DELEGATIONS
Richard O'Brien
Lois Hancey
CARRIED
(a) Mr. Charles Wheeler, Project Manager, Sheppard Subway, TTC, spoke to Agenda Item 4:
Sheppard Subway Proposal, Environmental Assessment. He presented the proposal for the
Sheppard Subway to cross the east Don River and the impact it would have on the Don
River Watershed.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B139
DELEGATIONS
(b) Mr. Jeffery S. Lyons of Fogler, Fubinoff, Barristers & Solicitors, spoke to the
recommendation before the Committee on Agenda Item 5: Request for use of Authority
owned lands by Forest Valley Day Camp Limited, City of North York, Don River Watershed.
CORRESPONDENCE
Letter from Councillor Michael Feldman, City of North York, dated August 12, 1993, re: Forest
Valley Day Camp Limited.
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 -1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION
COMPONENT
- Humber River Watershed, Dorothy and William Bonner Property
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located at 165 Old King Road in the Bolton area of the Town of Caledon
under "Land Acquisition Project - 1987-1991" - Flood Plain and Conservation Component - Humber
River Watershed.
Res. #E119/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 6.1 acres, more or less, be purchased from
William and Dorothy Bonner, said land being an irregular shaped parcel of land consisting of all of
Lot 9 and Part of Lots 10 and 11, Plan ALB -2, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel,
known as 165 Old King Road;
THAT the purchase price be the sum of $299,000., on the basis of the sum of $174,000. being
payable on the closing date of October 1, 1993, and the balance of $125,000. being payable on or
before August 31, 1994;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
B140 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6193, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FO;'. AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 -1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION
COMPONENT (CONTD.)
- Humber River Watershed, Dorothy and William Bonner Property
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #51, Authority Meeting #3, May 2, 1986 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with J.J. Grogan Real Estate Limited, representative of the
owner.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
The subject property is situate within the Regional Flood Plain of the Humber River, south and east
of the Bolton special policy area. There is an existing dwelling on the property which is located
within the hydraulic floodway. There is a history of flooding in this area as recently as January,
1989, through an ice jam which caused severe flooding requiring the evacuation of the current
property owners.
This property was brought to the attention of the Authority during the early part of this year, as the
owners were investigating redevelopment potential. A 'plan illustrating the specific location of the
property was available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved Master Plan of Acquisition and is a severe
flood prone location.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004-11-502, Flood Control Hazard and it is proposed the
funding be obtained from land sale revenue.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B141
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. SALE OF LAND
- Former Estate of John G. Oster, Sarah and Ernest Leyshon- Hughes Property
-Town of Pickering
KEY ISSUE
Sale of land situate on the west side of Sideline #4 in the Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality
of Durham.
Res. #E120/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report dated August 4, 1993, be
received and that a further report be submitted to the members of the Authority with respect to the
offers received on the sale of land situate on the west side of Sideline #4, in the Town of
Pickering, through the public tender process.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #7/91 held on October 18, 1991, the members of the Authority approved the
purchase of 155 acres, more or less, from the Estate of John Osler. The purchase price for this
property was $690,000. payable on closing; and, in addition the Authority guaranteed payment of
an additional $200,000. on or before December 31, 1993. This payment was to be obtained from
the sale of 5 acres which was part of the original holding and was severed into a lot in conjunction
with the purchase. Subsequently the size of the proposed lot was reduced from 5 acres to 2 1/2
acres to meet environmental concerns and to allow for as much as possible of this Oak Ridges
Moraine and Duffin Creek headwaters land to remain in public ownership.
The lot was listed at $215,000. on the multiple listing service for the Toronto Real Estate Board
and the Oshawa and District Real Estate Board in December of 1991. The listing price was
reduced to $201,000. in March of 1993 and the property is not currently listed.
Since no offers were received through real estate agents, the availability of the lot at this location
was advertised publicly for sale in two major Toronto newspapers and two local newspapers during
the past few weeks.
Prospective purchasers have been requested to have sealed offers submitted to the attention of the
Chief Administrative Officer of the Authority before 4:00 p.m., August 12, 1993. Copies of the
information provided to prospective purchasers were forwarded with the agenda.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The funds generated from this sale will be utilized to pay the outstanding commitment from the
purchase of the Estate of John G. Osler Property. An amount of $200,000. from Authority land
sale revenue from the Highway 407 sale at Claireville, which was the funding source approved by
the Province of Ontario to fund this purchase, has been held in reserve pending the successful
completion of this sale.
B142 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND
-West Side of Glen Major Road, Township of Uxbridge
KEY ISSUE
Sale of surplus Authority owned land situate on the west side of Glen Major Road in the Township
of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of Durham.
Res. #E121/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report dated August 4, 1993, be
• eceived and that a further report be submitted to the members of the Authority with respect to the
offers received on the sale of land on the west side of Glen Major Road, Township of Uxbridge,
through the public tender process.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #3/93 held on April 23, 1993, a residential lot together with a dilapidated
frame dwelling was declared surplus to the requirements of the Authority. This decision was made
after extensive public consultation in accordance with Authority policy for land disposal.
The availability of the surplus Authority owned lot at this location was advertised publicly for sale
during the past few weeks, with all interested parties who expressed an interest in purchasing the
lot during the public consultation process, also being advised of the availability of the lands.
Prospective purchasers have been requested to have sealed offers submitted to the attention of the
Chief Administrative Officer of the Authority before 4:00 p.m., August 12, 1993. Copies of the
information provided to prospective purchasers were circulated with the agenda.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that.the funds generated from the sale of this surplus land be utilized to acquire
additional environmentally sensitive and conservation land in the Oak Ridges Moraine and
Headwaters of the Authority's area of jurisdiction.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B143 •
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 -1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION
COMPONENT
-The Christian and Missionary Alliance Eastern and Central Canadian District
-Rouge River Watershed
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located north of Sheppard Avenue, east of Meadowvale Road under "Land
Acquisition Project - 1987 - 1991" - Flood Plain and Conservation Component - Rouge River
Watershed.
Res. #E122/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.004 acres, more or less, be purchased from
The Christian and Missionary Alliance Eastern and Central Canadian District, said land being an
irregular shaped parcel of land being Part of Lot 4, Concession 3, City of Scarborough, The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, located north of Sheppard Avenue, east of Meadowvale
Road;
THAT the purchase price is to be the nominal consideration of $2.00, together with the right for
The Christian and Missionary Alliance Eastern and Central Canadian District to retain possession of
the buildings located on the land and a surrounding 3 metre strip until same are no longer being
used for church purposes;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
AMENDMENT
Res. #E123/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THAT The Christian and Missionary Alliance Eastern and Central Canadian District are responsible
for the property tax on buildings located on the land and a surrounding 3 metre strip until same are
no longer being used for church purposes.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
B144 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 '
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION
COMPONENT (CONTD.)
-The Christian and Missionary Alliance Eastern and Central Canadian District
-Rouge River Watershed
BACKGROUND
Resolution #51, Authority Meeting #3, May 2, 1986 approving the project.
This purchase includes valley slope plus a 10 metre buffer. Located partially within the buffer is a
residence for the Minister of the church and located entirely within the buffer is a garage. As part
of this transaction, the church will retain the right to use the dwelling and garage. An agreement is
being prepared that will ensure the Authority will not assume any responsibility for liability, costs or
maintenance relating to the structures and surrounding 3 metre strip and will limit the duration of
the occupation.
Negotiations have been conducted with H.A. Verbruggen of R.V. Anderson Associates Limited
representatives of the owners.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
A plan illustrating the specific location was available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved Master Plan for Acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The funding of this purchase will be charged to Account 004-11-502 - Flood Control Hazard
Account.
5. CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO
-Re- appointment of William R. Livingston
KEY ISSUE
The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto appoints members for a three year term.
Res. #E124 /93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the membership of
William R. Livingston be renewed for a further three -year term, September 9, 1993 to
September 9, 1996.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 6145
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO (CONTD.)
-Re- appointment of William R. Livingston
BACKGROUND
"UPON APPROVAL made by the members of The Executive Committee at its meeting held
Tuesday, June 15, 1993, THAT W. R. Livingston continue as a member of The Conservation
Foundation of Greater Toronto for a further three -year term - September 9, 1993 to September 9,
1996 - subject to the necessary approval of the Conservation Authority and ratification of the
Board of the Foundation at its next meeting September 16, 1993."
Approval is now being requested to comply with the guidelines set out in the Conservation
Foundation's Charter and By -Laws.
6. WILD WATER KINGDOM
-Lease Administration
KEY ISSUE
Status of lease administration matters at Wild Water Kingdom as of current date.
Res. #E125/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT in view of the refusal of the Canadian
Western Bank to agree with the proposed rental deferment of outstanding rental payments to
September 30, 1993, the Authority advised Wild Water Kingdom that all rents currently
outstanding and future rental payments must be paid in accordance with the terms and provisions
of the existing agreements;
AND FURTHER THAT the Authority's staff and solicitor be directed to take the necessary action to
protect the Authority's interests in this matter.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
When Wild Water Kingdom acquired the leasehold interest in the Waterpark from Canadian Western
Bank, Wild Water, the Bank and MTRCA entered into an agreement that MTRCA would not amend
or modify the lease without the written consent of the Bank. This was requested by the Bank as
its security for the unpaid purchase price owed by Wild Water Kingdom was the Waterpark.
On May 7, 1993, in compliance with a request by Wild Water Kingdom and on the understanding
that the Banks would agree with a rental deferment as they had done in previous years, Resolution
#E64/93 was adopted:
B146 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. WILD WATER KINGDOM (CONTD.)
-Lease Administration
"THAT in 1993 the Schedule for the lease revenues payable to the Authority as
provided for in the lease agreement between the Authority and Wild Water Kingdom
be amended such that in 1993 only, payment of all rent due in 1993 shall be
payable on or before September 30th, 1993;
AND FURTHER THAT staff in conjunction with the Authority's solicitors, be
authorized and directed to develop a suitable agreement to implement the
rescheduling in a manner which protects fully the Authority's interests."
Discussions have been ongoing with representatives of Wild Water Kingdom, the Royal Bank, and
the Canadian Western Bank and the status is as follows:
(a) The Royal Bank has agreed to the deferment as proposed by the Authority;
(b) The Canadian Western Bank has not agreed to the proposed deferment of
rental payments for 1993;
(c) Wild Water Kingdom has made all required rental payments.
7. SHEPPARD SUBWAY PROPOSAL
- Environmental Assessment
KEY ISSUE
Review and comments on the proposed Sheppard Subway and its impact on the Don River
watershed at Leslie Street.
Res. #E126/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THAT the staff report, dated August 5, 1993, regarding the Sheppard Subway Proposal -
Environmental Assessment, be received;
THAT the TTC be advised that, while impacts on the valley corridor would be avoided by the
Sheppard Subway being tunnelled to cross under the East Don River, the alternative to cross over
the river immediately downstream of the Leslie Street /Sheppard Avenue intersection may be
acceptable sub pct to the detailed design satisfactorily addressing the issues of upstream flooding
and valley corridor conservation;
AND FURTHER THAT the application for a permit for this crossing be accompanied by detailed
plans for site rehabilitation which reflect the intent of the Authority for the protection and
restoration of valley and stream corridors and the vision for the Don Watershed being developed by
the Don Watershed Task Force.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B147
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. SHEPPARD SUBWAY PROPOSAL (CONTD.)
- Environmental Assessment
AMENDMENT
Res. #E127/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the second paragraph of the motion be amended to read:
Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
THAT the TTC be advised that, while impacts on the valley corridor would be avoided by the
Sheppard Subway being tunnelled to cross under the East Don River, the alternative to cross over
the river immediately downstream of Leslie Street /Sheppard Avenue intersection is acceptable
subject to the detailed design satisfactorily addressing an upstream increase in flooding no greater
than 0.3m and that any affected private property owners will be contacted and their concerns
addressed by the TTC.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In April 1990, the Province of Ontario announced the "Let's Move" program, to ease traffic
congestion in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) through expansion of rapid transit service. There are
eight components to the "Let's Move" program and Authority staff have been active in
commenting where these affect adopted policy or program areas, particularly any potential impacts
related to valley and stream corridors.
PROPOSAL
The Sheppard Subway proposes a new subway line connecting the North York City Centre and the
Scarborough City Centre and providing a high level of public transit in the Sheppard Avenue East
corridor. This proposed link dates back to the 1980 Metropolitan Toronto Official Plan.
The preferred technology for this project is a subway. Generally, this preference would alleviate
Authority staff concerns as impacts on valley and stream corridors would be minimal; however, the
TTC is not proposing an underground subway crossing at the East Don River.
Three alternatives were initially considered at this location:
i) an elevated crossing of the CN tracks, Leslie Street and the Don River;
ii) a deep underground tunnel below the CN tracks, Leslie Street and the Don River
bed; and
iii) a shallow, partially underground profile crossing under the CN tracks and Leslie
Street, but emerging immediately east of Leslie to cross over the Don River, in an
enclosed structure.
Alternative (i) was rejected early in the process.
B148 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. SHEPPARD SUBWAY PROPOSAL (CONTD.)
- Environmental Assessment
IMPACT ON AUTHORITY POLICIES AND PROGRAMS
Authority policy recognizes the need for transportation routes to cross valley and stream corridors.
From a flood control perspective, the minimum requirement is that such crossings not aggravate
upstream flooding. In addition to concerns respecting upstream flooding impacts, staff identified
concerns regarding the impact of this proposal on the valley corridor, at the crossing, and potential
implications for downstream impacts associated with the Toss of valley features and modification to
the valley form. Staff, therefore, recommended alternative (ii), the underground tunnel, in order to
avoid potential negative impacts on the East Don River.
The TTC has selected alternative (iii) based on an evaluation of costs and operational
considerations. Lowering the tunnel to go under the river has been estimated, by the TTC, to raise
project costs significantly both for the tunnel itself and for the increased depth between surface
entrances and station platforms, as well as at all emergency access points.
The level of technical detail provided in an EA document is insufficient for an Authority permit
application, which this crossing will eventually require. This detail is anticipated to be part of the
detailed design phase and to follow EA approval. This approach could create a situation where an
EA has been approved, but, where detailed design identifies that the preferred alternative will have
significant negative impact. Given the existing constraints at the Sheppard and Leslie intersection,
staff recommended that the TTC undertake a preliminary hydraulic analysis, prior to finalizing the
EA, in order to determine whether the recommended alternative was technically feasible.
The TTC has completed a Hydraulic Model Study of the crossing and has requested Authority
"approval in principle" to the proposal. TTC staff and their consultants will be present at the
Executive Committee meeting to explain the proposal.
There are three issues associated with the proposed crossing of the East Don River at Sheppard
Avenue /Leslie Street:
(1) the proposed subway box structure may reduce the existing channel cross section
and increase upstream flood levels under regional storm conditions;
(2) the crossing will require an extension to the wingwalls immediately downstream of
the road culvert and result in removal of existing vegetation within the project area
and alteration to the form and features of the valley corridor;
(3) under Ontario Regulation 158, there is no provision for granting an "approval in
principle ".
ITEM 1: To address the increase in upstream flooding the TTC has had a physical model of the
crossing constructed by Acres International Limited. As it is today, the Leslie /Sheppard
intersection would be overtopped to a depth of approximately 1 .6m under regional storm
conditions, to a flood level of 133.5m. With the Sheppard Subway in place, the preliminary
hydraulic analysis identified that there would be an increase in regional storm flood levels of
between 0.3m and 0.6m, resulting in depths between 133.8m and 134.1m immediately upstream
of the crossing. These impacts decrease with distance from the intersection and dissipate
approximately 2.8 km. upstream. Further analysis is currently being undertaken to determine
whether design modifications can reduce or eliminate upstream flooding completely.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B149
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. SHEPPARD SUBWAY PROPOSAL (CONTD.)
- Environmental Assessment
One alternative considered is to lower the channel bed of the river, immediately below the crossing.
To reduce or eliminate the upstream impact of increased flooding, however, it would be necessary
to lower the channel bed by approximately 4.5m. This does not appear to be practical from the '
perspective of its environmental impact, long -term maintenance requirements and public safety.
Another alternative discussed, was the construction of an overflow tunnel, paralleling the
watercourse, to alleviate upstream impacts during a flood event and to provide pedestrian access
and a valley corridor link under normal conditions. While this inay be technically feasible, the
length of tunnel required would be costly and would likely be unattractive and potentially unsafe for
pedestrian use.
The valley corridor upstream of the crossing is well defined and is largely in Authority ownership.
While no private homes would be affected by the potential increase in flood levels, there are
stretches where private lots extend into the valley and where, under regional storm conditions,
higher flood levels would affect the valley portion of these properties. In dealing with previous
situations where a public project would have this affect, the Authority has required the proponent
to obtain the consent of any affected landowners. The TTC has prepared mapping identifying the
affected public and private properties which will be available at the Executive meeting. The TTC
has proposed to meet with all affected owners and to address their concerns.
ITEM 2: Authority staff have noted concerns with respect to the loss of vegetation and the impact
of the extended winSawalls on the valley corridor, at and downstream of the crossing, specific to
the loss of the natural valley configuration, loss of riparian habitat and further degradation of the
Don Watershed system. Concerns for further negative impacts on the valley corridor are shared by
the Don Watershed Task Force.
TTC proposes to address this concern through site rehabilitation and to minimize the extent of the
hardened surfaces as much as practical, given the need to ensure the stability of the subway
structure. Further design studies are currently being undertaken to reduce the amount of alteration
to the valley corridor and to minimize the loss of existing vegetation.
ITEM 3: Ontario Resaulation 158 requires proponents of proposals such as the TTC's to receive
permission from the Authority. The details of the design, construction measures and site
rehabilitation plans form a part of the application, since there are no provisions for conditions to be
attached to a permit. Similarly, there is no provision for "approval in principle ".
The TTC has requested that this matter be brought before the Executive Committee, at this time, in
order that the benefits of the project and the measures proposed by TTC to minimize the impacts
can be discussed.
B150 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. REQUEST FOR USE OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS BY FOREST VALLEY
DAY CAMP LIMITED
-City of North York, Don River Watershed
KEY ISSUE
Request from Forest Valley Day Camp Limited (Bathurst Manor Day Camp & Swim Club Limited) to
extend an existing lease arrangement made at the time of acquisition which is currently scheduled
to terminate on November 1, 1993.
Res, #E128/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lois Griffin
THAI' the Authority advise The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, that it agrees in principle with
an extension of up to three years to the Forest Valley Day Camp Limited (Bathurst Manor Day
Camp & Swim Club Limited) for the use of certain Authority -owned lands on the following basis:
(a) The lease is to be for the months of July and August only during the years 1994, 1995 and
1996, with the exception of the office, which is currently being used year round. This
space could continue to be used on a year round basis until the arrangement concludes in
1996;
(b) The extension is to be on the basis that no additional extensions beyond 1996, will be
requested;
(c) Rental payment is to be at current market rent;
(d) The tenant is to be responsible for demolition and removal of all buildings and
improvements no longer required for the purposes of the Authority, The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto or the North York Board of Education during 1996;
(e) Any other conditions deemed necessary by the Authority solicitor to protect the Authority's
interests.
AMENDMENT
Res. #E129/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lois Griffin
THAT the Authority advise The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto that it agrees in principle with
an extension of up to four years to Forest Valley Day Camp Limited for the use of certain Authority
owned lands and that dates in the main motion be changed to reflect this.
AND FURTHER THAT the cost of demolition be considered as part of the establishment of the
market rent.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B151
SECTION I1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. REQUEST FOR USE OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS BY FOREST VALLEY
DAY CAMP LIMITED (CONTD.)
-City of North York, Don River Watershed
BACKGROUND
Representatives of Forest Valley Day Camp Limited appeared as a delegation at the Executive
Committee meeting held on July 9, 1993. The Executive Committee adopted Resolutions
#E112/93 and #E113/93:
"THAT the staff report dated July 2, 1993, relating to the request by Forest Valley Day
Camp Limited (Bathurst Manor Day Camp & Swim Club Limited) be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to discuss this matter further with officia /s of The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, the North York Board of Education and, if appropriate,
Forest Valley Day Camp Limited, and to report further to the Executive Committee at its
meeting scheduled for August 13, 1993.
Amendment: Resolution #E113/93
THAT in negotiation, staff attempt to obtain a head lease on this property."
Following the Executive Committee Meeting, discussions have taken place between Authority staff,
the tenant and his solicitor. Extensive discussions have also been carried out between
representatives of the Authority, and The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property
Department.
While the Authority and The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto are anxious to make as much of
the property available to the public for parks and public open space, as quickly as possible, delays
in completing other acquisitions in this area and the delay in constructing the linear park parkway
pathway system due to funding constraints, allow for a continuation of the summer day camp use
of the property for a short period of time with no major detriment to current park development
plans. Staff feel that a three year extension is fair and reasonable on the basis that the buildings
and improvements not required for public purposes be demolished by the tenant in the final year of
the extended tenancy.
The tenant has been advised of the staff recommendation in this instance and advises that due to
the capital input required at this time to carry on the day camp operations, a minimum of a five
year extension is required. Staff cannot agree to this length of term. The tenant is also not
amenable to being responsible for demolition of the buildings and improvements.
While the North York Board of Education requires a multi year commitment for the board's use of
the property, The board's plans at this time only include provision for a ten months use of the
property each year. The recommendation as presented, meets the needs of the board who have
made it clear to the Authority that the board does wish to be involved with subletting during the
summer months. It would appear that it is in the best interest of all parties, that separate leases be
arranged at this time with both Forest Valley Day Camp Limited and the North York Board of
Education. The terms and conditions of these leases will be arranged by staff of The Municipality
of Metropolitan Parks and Property Department with the final details being brought back to the
members of the Authority for further consideration and formal approval at a later date.
B152 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. REQUEST FOR USE OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS BY FOREST VALLEY
DAY CAMP LIMITED (CONTD.)
-City of North York, Don River Watershed
The lands were purchased by the Authority under the Metro Hazard Acquisition Project for
Conservation and Open Space purposes. Funding for this acquisition was provided on a 50/50
basis by The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the Province of Ontario.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The leases under this arrangement will fall under the provisions of the existing valley land
management agreement between the Authority and Metro. In accordance with the terms of this
agreement, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto is responsible for payment of all taxes and
maintenance costs for Authority owned lands turned over to Metro and managed under this
arrangement. Accordingly, all rents received will be payable to The Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto.
9. SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT EXTENSION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
- Notice of Completion of Government Review
KEY ISSUE
Completion of the Government Review of the Scarborough Rapid Transit Extension Environmental
Assessment and the response to Authority staff comments on the project.
Res. #E130/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT the Executive Committee receive the staff report on the Government Review of the
Environmental Assessment of the Scarborough Rapid Transit Extension;
THAT the TTC be advised that the structures required to implement the Scarborough Rapid Transit
Extension should be located so that they will not aggravate or create flood and /or erosion risk
within the Highland Creek watershed;
THAT the TTC incorporate measures to minimize negative environmental impacts on and maximize
opportunities for rehabilitation and regeneration of the Highland Creek valley corridor as a part of
this project;
AND FURTHER THAT staff of the Ministry of Environment and Energy be advised that, under
Ontario Regulation 158, the Authority considers, first, whether a oroject should be permitted and,
second, if it is to be permitted, what requirements it must satisfy.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 8153
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT EXTENSION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (CONTD.)
- Notice of Completion of Government Review
BACKGROUND
In April 1990, the Province of Ontario announced the "Let's Move" program, to ease traffic
congestion in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) through expansion of rapid transit service. There are
eight components to the "Let's Move" program and Authority staff have been active in
commenting where these affect adopted policy or program areas, particularly any potential impacts
related to valley and stream corridors.
The Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT) Extension is proposed to extend the existing SRT from its
present terminus at McCowan Station to a location just north of Sheppard Avenue on the east side
of Markham Road.
The extension will use the existing technology, intermediate capacity transit system (ICTS), and
will be elevated, with the exception of an at -grade section, from McCowan to just west of Bellamy
Road. The project includes stations at Markham Road, Milner Avenue and Sheppard Avenue, with
provision for a future station at Bellamy Road. The existing McCowan Yard is to be
decommissioned and a new yard built east of Bellamy Road between Progress Avenue and Highland
Creek.
IMPACT ON AUTHORITY POLICIES AND PROGRAMS
The Scarborough Rapid Transit Extension impacts on Authority interests, as follows:
(1) between Bellamy Road and Markham Road the SRT Extension parallels, and then
crosses, the Highland Creek valley corridor. The supports for the elevated structure
will be located either within or adjacent to the regulated valley corridor and will
require permits,
(2) Highland Creek has a history of flooding and erosion problems and the Authority has
carried out numerous remedial projects to address this situation,
(3) the future station at Bellamy Road is to be elevated above the road, at the point
where it crosses the Highland Creek, and will be subject to Authority regulatory
requirements to ensure that its foundations do not aggravate flooding or erosion,
(4) the project affects a reach of the Highland Creek which is currently channelized and
where there has been recent discussion with staff of the City of Scarborough
respecting valley corridor enhancement opportunities,
(5) the proposed new yard, between Progress Avenue and the Highland Creek, and the
structures, described above, may limit future opportunities for the restoration and
enhancement of the valley corridor.
B154 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 •
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT EXTENSION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (CONTD.)
- Notice of Completion of Government Review
The Ministry of Environment and Energy has completed the Government Review of the project and
a copy was forwarded to the Authority, by letter of July 20, 1993, noting that requests to the
Minister of Environment and Energy for this project to be the subject of a Hearing may be made
prior to September 1, 1993.
The Government Review of the EA concludes that, while there are several deficiencies in the
document, all necessary components are present and, further, that the project may be approved
with conditions.
In addressing the Authority's concerns, the Government Review concluded that:
"It is MTRCA's responsibility to issue a permit for the project and approve the construction
drawings. This will give the agency a further opportunity to address its concerns."
As a condition of approval of the EA, the Government Review recommends that:
"During the detailed design but prior to construction, the TTC will consult with The
Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to address potential impacts on
Highland Creek, and discuss the issues of structures in areas of erosion /flood susceptibility
and measures to minimize further degradation and maximize enhancement of the Highland
Creek."
These statements suggest that the Authority's regulation may only consider how a project is to be
carried out and does not recognize that the Authority's initial consideration is whether or not the
project should be carried out and that the Authority may refuse permission if the project is not
consistent with Authority requirements for valley and stream corridors. This should be clarified
with staff of the Ministry of Environment and Energy prior to their review of future projects.
Staff recognize the difficulties inherent in introducing rapid transit, or other infrastructure
improvements, into developed areas. Given the existing development within the Greater Toronto
Area and the need for infrastructure improvements, upgrades and extensions, there has been
considerable attention on remaining open areas, particularly valley and stream corridors, as
potential locations. While, in specific situations these uses may be accommodated without
significant negative impact, the Authority must be concerned with the long -term health of its
watersheds and the potential cumulative effects of numerous servicing proposals. The valley and
stream corridors have been, wherever possible, protected from encroachment by development.
Their protection, however, has been for conservation purposes and not to ensure their availability
as transportation and utility corridors. The public has expressed its concern, through such groups
as the Don Watershed Task Force, for the loss of natural valley and stream corridors and its
interest in the restoration and enhancement of corridors, such as this section of the Highland
Creek, which were altered during the development process.
TTC staff and their consultants have Qt with Authority staff to discuss the above noted concerns.
Based on their review and considerat of all issues, this alignment remains the TTC's preferred
alternative. TTC staff have indicate, .. at they will identify and incorporate measures to minimize
negative impacts on the Highland Creek and will seek opportunities to improve and regenerate the
existing channelized sections as a part of the site restoration process.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B155
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. TORONTO ISLANDS SHORELINE MANAGEMENT STUDY
KEY ISSUE
Authorization of extra work to be done by W.F. Baird and Associates to prepare detailed designs
and construction specifications for the first stage of shoreline wall repairs.
Res. #E131/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT W. F. Baird and Associates be authorized to complete the detailed design and construction
specifications for repairs to the shoreline wall on the north side of Ward's Island within a total
estimated fee of $21,000 including any geotechnical analysis on Toronto Islands.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Province of Ontario requested the Authority to undertake a study of the shoreline management
issues associated with Toronto Islands and to undertake the necessary measures to improve the
protection of the residential community. The Authority retained W. F. Baird and Associates to
undertake the study after a consultant selection process in accordance with the Authority's
purchasing policy for professional services. Although the study will not be completed until
approximately October 31, 1993, the shoreline structure assessment has been completed and it is
already apparent that certain wall repairs and improvements are necessary. In order to expedite
construction, it is important to proceed with detailed design and tender documents.
RATIONALE
The rationale to proceed with the detailed design and construction specifications is based on the
following considerations:
the construction can be done most effectively in the fall when water levels are
lower but there is no ice to hamper access;
the wall in question is deteriorating but can be salvaged if repairs are done soon;
the Jobs Ontario funding which has been assigned to this project should be utilized
to create construction activity as soon as possible.
The rationale to retain W. F. Baird and Associates is based on the following considerations:
the upset fee is below the limit which requires competitive proposals under the
Purchasing Policy;
W. F. Baird and Associates was just selected in February 1993 through a
competitive selection process;
the firm's work on the project to date has been effectively undertaken;
having just completed the structural assessment, it is most effective to have the
same design team continue responsibility for the repairs.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The upset limit for the fee for this portion of the work is $21,000. Funds are available in Accounts
151 -01 -343. This project is funded 100% by the Province of Ontario.
B156 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND SUBWATERSHED PLANNING
- Development of Educational Materials
KEY ISSUE
Hiring of a consultant to support a Ministry of Environment and Energy and The Metropolitan
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority project for the development of Stormwater
Management and Subwatershed Planning educational seminar relating to the Toronto Area
Watershed Management Studies (TAWMS).
Res. #E132/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT Gore and Storrie Ltd. be retained by the Authority at a cost not to exceed $20,000 to
undertake the preparation of materials for a Stormwater Management Planning and Design Seminar
For New Development.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Water Resources Branch of the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MOEE) has contributed
money to the MTRCA to carry out joint projects relating to the Toronto Area Watershed
Management Studies (TAWMS). One of the initiatives identified in 1993 is the development of an
educational training seminar dealing with stormwater management and subwatershed planning.
This proposal is entitled "Stormwater Management Planning and Design Seminar for New
Development" and will integrate the concepts of stormwater best management practices (BMP's)
with watershed strategies. Authority staff have been actively involved in the preparation of the
recently released MNR /MOEE Subwatershed Planning document. Currently, there are several
municipalities, within our jurisdiction, that have begun to develop subwatershed plans and have
requested Authority staff participation with this planning process. Authority staff believe that
subwatershed planning, together with improved stormwater management practices and its
integration with municipal planning, represents a significant step towards achieving ecosystem
planning. This view is consistent with recommendations of the Commission on Planning and
Development Reform in Ontario (Sewell), proposals put forward by the Royal Commission on the
Future of the Toronto Waterfront and the Authority's Draft Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program.
The proposed MTRCA /MOEE seminar is expected to be endorsed by the Provincial Urban Drainage
Advisory Committee (PUDAC) and will be targeted at municipal planners and engineers,
conservation authorities review /approval staff and planning and engineering consultants. This
seminar will provide a unique training opportunity for all individuals involved in resource planning
and land use planning, which will enhance their understanding of this integrated ecosystem
planning approach. The seminar will comprise a number of modules such as Hydrology Principles,
Introduction to Stormwater Best Management Practices ( BMP's) and Water Management on a
Watershed Basis. All modules for the seminar will include textural material, illustrations and slides.
It is envisioned that specific modules from this project, such as Subwatershed Planning, could be
offered in a speciality seminar by the Authority to help educate those involved in the subwatershed
planning process.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B157
SECTION 1I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND SUBWATERSHED PLANNING (CONTD.)
- Development of Educational Materials
RATIONALE
The Ministry of Environment and Energy has identified a need to have the products of this project
available by December 1993, so that they may be used in a MOEE /Municipal Engineering
Association (MEA) course. In addition, specialized skills of a professional educator are required
with previous experience in preparing educational programs coupled with a sound technical
knowledge of subwatershed planning and stormwater management. In consideration of the time
constraints and the level of expertise which is not available at the Authority, staff recommend a
consulting firm be retained to prepare the Stormwater Management Planning and Design Seminar
for New Development. The key function of the successful consultant would be to review
technical concepts on subwatershed planning and stormwater management and present this
material through written and visual format so that it is easily understood by all target audiences. A
terms of reference outlining the objective and project proposal were sent to the following four
individuals /consulting firms:
• Barry Moncrieff - Envired
• Dave Maunder - Aquafor Engineering Ltd.
• Doug Andrews - Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd.
• Craig MacRae - Gore and Storrie Ltd.
The consultants were requested to summarize their ability /qualifications in the field of education,
stormwater management and subwatershed planning. The MTRCA /MOEE evaluated the four
proposals that were submitted based on the following criteria:
• Understanding of background, intent of project;
• Qualifications /ability in the field of education;
• Commitment and qualifications of principal investigators;
• Study approach;
• Quality and sufficiency of the deliverable end products;
• Balance between the state -of- the -art approaches and the practical constraints in
stormwater management;
• Writing skills demonstrated by the proposal; and
• Cost
The upset limit for this project was $20,000. All four firms estimated the cost of the project to be
$20,000 including GST. Based on the evaluation criteria, the review committee recommends the
consulting firm of Gore and Storrie Ltd. is the best qualified to undertake the preparation of the
Stormwater Management Planning and Design Seminar for New Development.
BENEFITS
The MTRCA /MOEE subwatershed planning and stormwater management educational seminar will
have the following benefits:
• Professional development of materials which reflect state -of- the -art in subwatershed
planning and stormwater management;
B158 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION II - • EMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND SUBWATERSHED PLANNING (CONTD.)
- Development of Educational Materials
• Educational materials that will be offered, as a minimum, as part of the regular
MOEE /Municipal Engineering Association (MEA) training course, but which also will be
available to any group /agency such as the Authority; and
• Provide more opportunities for education and training in the field of stormwater
management and subwatershed planning that will ultimately increase the level of
understanding among practitioners thereby, assisting the Authority in its plan review
process and watershed strategy implementation.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
All funds for this project are provided by the Ministry of Environment and Energy and are available
under account number 601 -01.
12. REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF AUTHORITY -OWNED LANDS
- Adjacent to 38 Grovetree Road, Humber River watershed, City of Etobicoke
- Adjacent to 429 Rouge Hills Drive, Rouge River watershed, City of Scarborough
KEY ISSUE
The Authority is in receipt of a request from The Metropolitan Toronto Encroachment Review
Committee to explore the possibility of a land exchange and sale involving small fragments of land
at certain locations.
Res. #E133/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT the potential disposal of small fragments of land at the locations set out below, be referred •
to the Authority staff for review and discussions with adjacent property owners, in accordance
with established Authority policies: adjacent to 38 Grovetree Road, Humber River Watershed, City
of Etobicoke; adjacent to 429 Rouge Hills Drive, Rouge River Watershed, City of Scarborough.
AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought back to the Executive Committee at a future date
recommending further action.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
These matters are being brought to your attention in accordance with the provisions of Resolution
#26, adopted by the Members of the Authority at a meeting held on February 22, 1991.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 8159
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
13. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 AND INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION
AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 - 1995 (CONTD.)
- Michael William and Mary Anastasia Riley Property
KEY ISSUE
Update on status of negotiations for purchase of property located at 57 Main Street, Markham.
Res. #E134/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT the staff report dated July 29, 1993, relating to the purchase of the Riley property at 57
Main Street, Markham in the Rouge River Watershed, be received.
BACKGROUND
CARRIED
At the Authority Meeting #6/93, held on July 23, 1993, staff were directed to proceed with
negotiations for the potential purchase of the subject property and report further at such time as
negotiations have been completed.
An executed Offer to Sell has now been received and accepted by the Authority within the
confines as approved at the meeting held on July 23, 1993. A copy of the executed Offer to Sell
is attached for the information of the Members of the Executive Committee.
In accordance with the direction of the Members of the Authority, requests for funding to complete
this purchase were forwarded to officials of the Town of Markham and the Province of Ontario.
Staff are currently awaiting advice as to whether funding for this acquisition will be forthcoming.
Further information will be provided to the Members, at such time as replies from the Province and
the Town of Markham are at hand.
14. WRITE -OFF OF OUTSTANDING ACCOUNTS
- Bolton Nurseries
This item was recommended for approval at Finance and Administration Advisory Board Meeting
#3/93, held July 23, 1993.
KEY ISSUE
The report recommends the write -off of the unpaid amount due from Bolton Nurseries.
Res. #E135/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT the account receivable of Bolton Nurseries in the amount of $4,829.76, plus arrears interest,
be written off.
CARRIED
B160 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. DECISION OF HEARING
-The Donalda Golf Club
KEY ISSUE
The Executive Committee ratified the decision of the Hearing Board.
Res. #E136/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lois Hancey
THAT the application by The Donald Golf Club, pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, to place fill
within a regulated area, on Part Lot 8, Concession 3 WYS (Don MiIIs /York Mills Road), in the City
of North York, Don River Watershed, be approved in accordance with the following documents and
plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Drawings; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Limited; Project No. 93036; Drawings
No. 1 and 2; dated July, 1993; issued August 3, 1993.
(2) Drawings; prepared by Thomas McBroom Associates Limited; Entitled Planting Plan Donalda
Golf and Country Club; Sheets L1 and 12; dated revised July 27, 1993.
(3) Cross Section of Proposed Interceptor Drain Adjacent to Green No. 16; dated received by
MTRCA June 3, 1993.
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Id) Maria A. Gawlev
Res. #E137/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
CARRIED
THAT the permit application by Maria A. Gawley, for permission to construct a house in the flood
plain, on Part Lot 12, Concession 10, (145 Main Street), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
Watershed, be approved in acordance with the following documents and plans which form part of
this permit:
(1) Site Grading Plan, 145 Main Street, Unionville; received July 5, 199...
(2) Elevation Plan, 145 Main Street, Unionville; received June 14, 1993.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B161
SECTION I1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(p) Gary Bowers & Diane Dunlop
Res. #E138/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT the permit application by Gary Bowere and Diane Dunlop for permission to construct a
retaining wall and place fill, on 24 Squire Baker's Lane, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
Watershed, be approved in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of
this permit:
(1) Retaining Wall Construction Details, 24 Squire Baker's Lane, Markham; prepared by
applicant; received July 30, 1993.
(2) Site Plan, 24 Squire Baker's Lane, Markham; prepared by applicant; received
June 3, 1993.
(r) Arthur Bamford Enterprises Ltd.
Res. #E139/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Jim Witty
CARRIED
THAT the permit application by Arthur Bamford Enterprises Ltd.for permission to replace two storm
outfalls, on Part Lots 2, 3 & 4, Concession 8, ( Parkview Golf Club, 6400 Steeles Avenue at 9th
Concession Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed, be approved in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan showing Routes, Outlets & Sediment Control, Parkview Golf Club, Markham;
Received August 3, 1993.
(2) Drainage Outfall & Erosion Control Provisions, Parkview Golf Club, Markham; Received June
28/93.
(3) Correspondance to MTRCA from Parkview Golf Club, Markham; dated July 29/93, Itemising
proposed plantings in riparian zone.
(4) Riparian Habitat Zone Map, Parkview Golf Course; received August 3, 1993.
CARRIED
(y) Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department
Res. #E140/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Brian Harrison
THAT the permit application by Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department to place fill on
Part Lots 11, 12, 13, Concession 1 WYS; Part Lots 104, 105, Registered Plan 204, (Don Valley
Golf Course), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed be received and that consideration to
the application be given when all documents and plans have been recieved.
CARRIED
B162 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
jaa) 733954 Ontario Ltd. c/o N. Barry Lyon Consultants Ltd.
Res. #E141/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Lorna Jackson
THAT the permit application by 733954 Ontario Ltd. for permission to modify a weir in order to
provide fish enhancement, on Part Lot 12, Concession 7, (Highway 7 at the Robinson Creek), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed, be approved in accordance with the following
documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Letter of Undertaking prepared by G.M. Sernas and Associates; received August 11, 1993.
(2) Site Plan Drawing for Robinson Creek Fishery Enhancement; prepared by G.M. Sernas &
Associates Ltd.; Drawing No. SWM -1; received on August 11, 1993.
AND FURTHER THAT the permit application be subject to:
(1) No permit is to be issued until the following information is provided in agreement with
Letter of Undertaking; prepared by G.M. Sernas Associates Ltd.; received August 11, 1993:
(a) detailed engineering plans for construction;
(b) fish passage calculations;
(c) proposed erosion and sediment control
(d) construction staging
(e) riparian planting scheme
(f) Hec II modelling for revised creek sections
(g) letter of permission from affected landowners
Res. #E142/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
CARRIED
THAT the permit applications listed herein as (a) to (w) inclusive, and added permit applications (x)
to (ee) inclusive, with the exception of (d) (p) (r) (v) (y) and (ea), be approved, in accordance to the
information contained within the reports.
CARRIED
(a) Terri Bowden & John McDonald
To construct within a flood plain, on Lot 14, Registered Plan 546, (187 Clarence
Street, Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Rosewood Construction; Site Plan and Drawing Nos. Al, A2, A3, A4
and A5 dated 06/02/93; received July 7, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B163
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(b) Metropolitan Toronto Parks & Property Department
To place fill within a regulated area, on Part Lot 12, Concession 1 WYS, (4200
Yonge Street), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department; Drawings A, B
and C dated June, 1993; received on June 29, 1993.
(c) Centennial College of Applied Arts
To regrade in order to construct a fire access route, on Part Lots 16, 17 & 18 ,
Concession 2, (41 Progress Court), in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek
Watershed
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Centennial College Site Plan; Drawing Nos. A1.0, A1.1, A1.2, A1.3, A1.4, M1.1, M1.2;
Project No. 92 -022; prepared by Nowski Partners Architects; dated April 6, 1993.
(2) Sediment Control Details; Drawing No. AD -1 12; Project No. 92 -002; prepared by the
Scarborough Board of Education; dated August 4, 1993.
(e) The Town of Richmond Hill - Works Department
To reconstruct a storm sewer headwall, on Part Lots 39 & 40, Concession 1 WYS,
(Avenue Road and Birch Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Denhalm Drive and Avenue Road, Road Reconstruction Storm Outfall; prepared by The
Town of Richmond Hill; Contract #TE- 01 -93; Drawing 25- 15 -D2; Sheet 9 of 9; revised July
5, 1993; received July 20, 1993.
(f) The Town of Richmond Hill
To construct a storm outfall, on Part Lot 37, Concession 1 WYS, (Pearson Avenue),
in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Pearson Avenue Road Reconstruction, Storm Outfall, prepared by The Town of Richmond
Hill; Contract #TE- 03 -93; Drawing #25 -1 1 -PP1 1; Sheet #6 of 11; revised July 1993;
received July 29, 1993.
B164 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
la) Frank Fasan
To place fill, on Lot 10, Registered Plan 499, (245 North Lake Road), in the Town
of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan Showing Existing Elevations; Lot 10, Plan 499, Richmond Hill; received July 23,
1993.
(2) Site Plan Showing Proposed Elevations, Lot 10, Plan 499, Richmond Hill; received July 23,
1993.
(3) Cross - Sections Showing Existing Grades, Lot 10, Plan 499, Richmond Hill; received July
23, 1993.
(4) Cross - Sections Showing Proposed Grades, Lot 10, Plan 499, Richmond Hill; received July
23, 1993.
(h) James H. Priest
To place fill in order to level an eroding roadway, on Part Lot 3, Concession BFC,
(670 Front Road), in the Town of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site and Cross - Sectional Plan for 670 Front Street; prepared and submitted by James H.
Priest; received on June 22, 1993.
(i) The Town of Caledon
To alter a watercourse, on Part Lot 33, Concessions 2 & 3 Albion, (3rd Line Albion),
in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Drawings; prepared by the Town of Caledon - Public Works Department, entitled "3rd Line
Albion - Lot 33, Culvert Replacement "; Drawing 1, revision 2, dated July, 1993; Drawing 2,
dated revised July, 1993.
(i) The City of Brampton - Public Works Department
To place fill within a regulated area, construct within a flood plain and alter a
waterway, on Part Lots 13 & 14, Concessions 5 & 6 EHS, (Torbram Road - north of
Bovaird Drive), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans, prepared by Candevcon Ltd.; Contract No. 93 -107; drawing No. K2 -8 -5; Sheet 2 of
8, revision 1, dated July 30, 1993.
(2) Letter from Mr. D. Van Benelen P.Eng., Director of Development and Engineering Services,
City of Brampton, Public Works Department; dated July 30, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B165
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(k) The City of Brampton - Public Works Department
To place fill within a regulated area, construct within a flood plain and alter a
waterway, on Part Lot 11, Concession 8, (McVean Drive - north of Castlemore
Road), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Chisholm, Fleming Associates Ltd.; Contract No. 93 -028:
Drawing N2 -8 -25, Sheet SH1, Revision 2, dated received June 18, 1993;
Drawing N2 -8 -26, Sheet SH2, Revision 3, dated July, 1993;
Drawing N2 -8 -27, Sheet SH3, Revision 3, dated May, 1993;
Drawing N2 -8 -28, Sheet SH4, dated June, 1993;
Drawing N2 -8 -29, Sheet SH5, dated June, 1993;
Drawing N2 -8 -30, Sheet SH6, dated June, 1993.
(I) Kalimba Land Development Corporation
To place fill within a regulated area, construct within a flood plain and alter a
waterway, on Part Lot 13, Concession 1 EHS, (southeast corner of Hurontario
Street (Hwy. #10) and Sandalwood Parkway East), in the City of Brampton,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Rand Engineering Ltd.; Contract No. 92309; Sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
10, 18, 20, 25, 27 dated February, 1993, received July 7, 1993; Sheet 8, dated February,
1993, received July 27, 1993.
(2) Letter of undertaking from E.A. Ha!penny, Kalimba Land Development Corp. dated August
9, 1993.
(m) The Regional Municipality of York - Ensaineerina Department
To place fill within a regulated area, construct within a flood plain, and alter a
waterway, on Part Lots 15 & 16, Concession 4, (Rutherford Road - West of
Grenock Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Drawings; prepared by The Regional Municipality of York /Dillon Ltd.; Contract No. 93 -07;
Drawing No. P- 1093 -11;
B166 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION 1I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(m) The Regional Municioalitv of York - Engineerino Deaartment (contd.)
Sheet No. 08, dated revision 1, dated August 4, 1993;
Sheet No. 10, dated revision 1, dated August 4, 1993;
Sheet No. 11, dated received June 7, 1993;
Sheet No. 15, dated received June 7, 1993;
Sheet No. 16, dated received June 7, 1993.
(n) Gerald & Marilyn Cornwell
To construct within a flood plain, on Lot 27, Registered Plan 4064, (46 Orchard
Crescent), in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by James Goad, Architect; Sheet Nos. Al, A2, A3, A4 and A5, dated May,
1993; received June 29, 1993.
(2) Floodproofing Analysis; prepared by Robert Halsall and Associates Limited; Project No.
93X1188, dated August 9, 1993; received August 10, 1993.
(3) Letter from Gerry Cornwell dated and received August 10, 1993.
(o) Rosemary Mackenzie
To construct a septic system, on Part Lot 26, Concession 5, (4444 Elgin Mills Road
west of Kennedy Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan of location of Septic Bed 4444 Elgin Mills Road, Markham; Received August 3,
1993.
(2) Cross- section of Existing and Proposed Grades, 4444 Elgin Mills Road, Markham; received
August 3, 1993.
(a) 741055 Ontario Limited
To construct a water quality pond, extend a headwall, construct two storm water
outfalls, construct a retaining wall, and construct a footbridge, on Part Lot 6,
Concession 6, (14th Avenue, west of McCowan Road), in the Town of Markham,
Rouge River Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans for 741055 Ontario Limited; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.; Project
#87495; Drawing Numbers 6, 7, 8, 301, 401; revised as received July 20, 1993.
(2) Plans for 741055 Ontario Limited; prepared by Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects;
Project #88 -576; Drawing Numbers L6, L7, L8; received August 5, 1993.
(3) Plans for 741055 Ontario Limited; prepared by Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects;
Project #88 -576; Drawing Number L5; received August 11, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 B167
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(s) Regional Municipality of Durham
To replace a culvert and construct erosion protection, on Part Lots 18 & 19,
Concessions 3 & 4, (Brock Road north of Taunton Road), in the Town of Pickering,
Duffin Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Urfe Creek Culvert Regional Municipality of Durham; prepared by Totten Sims Hubicki
Assoc.; Contract D93 -1; Drawing C -1; received May 20, 1993.
(2) Regional Road 1, Brock Road, Regional Municipality of Durham; prepared by Totten Sims
Hubicki Assoc.; Contract D93 -1, Drawing G3, received May 20, 1993.
(3) Regional Road 4, Taunton Road, Regional Municipality of Durham; prepared by Totten Sims
Hubicki Assoc.; Contract D93 -1, drawing T -5; received May 20, 1993.
(4) Brock Road /Urfe Creek Culverts, Regional Municipality of Durham; prepared by Totten Sims
Hubicki Assoc.; Contract D93 -1; Drawing L2; received July 30, 1993.
(5) Brock Road /Urfe Creek Culvert, Regional Municipality of Durham; Totten Sims Hubicki
Assoc.; Contract D93 -1; Drawing L1; received July 30, 1993.
(t) The Regional Municipality of Durham
To channelize a watercourse and extend two culverts, on Part Lots 15 to 19,
Concessions 3 - 4, (Taunton Road west of Brock Road), in the Town of Pickering,
Duffin Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Regional Road 4 Taunton Road Regional Municipality of Durham; prepared by Totten Sims
Hubicki Assoc.; Contract D93 -1, Drawings G -10, G -11, G -12, G -13, G -15; received on July
30, 1993.
(u) The Town of Aiax
To construct a stormwater outfall, on Part Lot 10, Concession 2, (Millers Creek at
McGill Drive and Westney Road North), in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) A4 Community Centre Town of Ajax, Site Plan - Mechanical; prepared by Totten Sims
Hubicki; Project 22- 13107; Drawing M101; revised and received, July 30, 1993.
(2) A4 Community Centre Town of Ajax, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan; prepared by
Totten Sims Hubicki; Project 22- 13107; Drawing EP101; revised as received July 30,
1993.
B168 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(v) The Regional Municipality of York
To replace a culvert, on Part Lot 1 & 35, Concession 7, (Stouffville Road), in the
Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, Rouge River Watershed.
Withdrawn as information not received.
(w) Dekkema Gervais Development Corporation
To construct an outfall and place fill, on Part Lot 1 & 2, Concession 9, (Mill Street,
Village of Stouffville), in the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, Duffin Creek
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Grading Plan for Dekkema Gervais Development Corporation; prepared by Cosburn
Patterson Wardman; Project #92979; Drawing #201; revised as received on July 27, 1993.
(2) Street Tree Planting for Dekkema Gervais Development Corporation; prepared by Cosburn
Giberson; received July 27, 1993.
(3) Sediment and Erosion Control Plan for Dekkema Gervais Development Corporation; prepared
by Cosburn Patterson Wardman; Project #92979; Drawing #401, received July 27, 1993.
(x) Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department
To place fill in a regulated area, on Lots 399, 340, 400 & Lake Promenade,
Registered Plan 2172, (Marie Curtis Park), in the City of Etobicoke, Etobicoke Creek
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by H. Sustronk and Associates Ltd.; Job No. 93 -30; Drawings 1, 2, 3;
dated August 1993.
(z) The Regional Municipality of York
To replace an existing failing culvert with a concrete rigid frame culvert, on Part
Lots 20 & 21, Concession 10, (Major Mackenzie Drive 0.4 km. west of the
York /Durham Line), in the Town of Markham, Duffin Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Culvert Replacemnt Drawings; Sheet Nos. 1 - 3; Contract No. 93 -23; prepared by the
Regional Municipality of York; revised as received on August 5, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993 9169
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(bb) Consumers' Gas
To place a gas line under a watercourse, on Part Lot 43, Concession 1 EYS,
(Church Street at Weldrick Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River
Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan Showing Proposed Gas Installation; prepared by Consumer's Gas; Order #30- 6109 -93;
Drawing #30 -3500, Sheet 2, received July 2, 1993.
(cc) The Regional Municipality of Durham
To construct a 600 mm diameter watermain across the Duffin Creek, on Part Lots
18 & 19, Concession 2, (Brock Road north of Finch Avenue East), in the Town of
Pickering, Duffin Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Brock Road Sanitary Sewer and Watermain; prepared by G.M. Sernas & Associates; Project
No. 93041; Drawing No. 2; revised as received on July 9, 1993.
(2) Brock Road Sanitary Sewer and Watermain; prepared by G.M. Sernas & Associates; Project
No. 93041; Drawing No. 4; received May 19, 1993.
(dd) Lisgoold Developments
To regrade to construct a stormwater management pond and new Tots, on Part Lots
19 & 20, Concession 2, (Brock Road and Major Oaks Road), in the Town of
Pickering, Duffin Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Lisgoold Subdivision Grading Plans; Drawing No.s 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 and 15;
prepared by Fred Schaeffer and Associates Ltd.; revised as received on June 3, 1993.
(2) Landscape Planting Plans; prepared by Strybos Associates Ltd.; Drawing Nos. 1 -5, Project
No. 92 -1036; revised as received on July 29, 1993.
(ee) The Town of Uxbridge
To construct a bypass channel on Part Lots 11 & 12, Concession 1, (York Durham
Line), in the Town of Uxbridge, Duffin Creek Watershed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Township of Uxbridge Improvements Norton's Pond; prepared by Totten Sims Hubicki
Associates; Drawing #1, 2, 1X, 2X; received June 17, 1993.
B170 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/93, AUGUST 13, 1993
NEW BUSINESS
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY
Res. #E143/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
THAT staff be authorized to enter into negotiation with Vera and William Brady with respect to the
purchase of property at 4 Wynnview Court, Scarborough. •
Res. #E144/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
CARRIED
THAT staff be authorized to enter into negotiations with Mr. John Connell with respect to the
purchase of property at 2972 Lakeview Boulevard, Ajax.
CARRIED
MEETING LOCATION
Brian Harrison extended an invitation to the Authority to hold one of its meeting at the Metropolitan
Toronto Zoo and directed staff to schedule an appropriate date.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:55 a.m., August 13, 1993.
William B. Granger J. Craig Mather
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
/bb.
Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
erthe metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
ty
minutes
SEPTEMBER 10, 1993
B171
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #7/93
The Executive Committee met at the Authority office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday,
September 10, 1993. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
MINUTES
Res. #E145/93
Chair William Granger
Vice Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Richard O'Brien
Jim Witty
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #6193 be approved.
DELEGATIONS
Lorna Jackson
Paul Palleschi
Lois Hancey
Richard O'Brien
CARRIED
David Fujiwara, Chairman, Property and Capital Steering Committee, McMichael Canadian Art
Collection, and John Ryerson, Director, Operations, McMichael Canadian Art Collection spoke on
the proposed expansion of their facilities.
Res. #E146/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT any revised design plans from McMichael Canadian Art Collection be referred to staff for
examination and report to the Executive Committee with recommendations.
' CARRIED
B172 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993
CORRESPONDENCE
(a) Letter from Barbara Tyler, Chief Executive Officer, McMichael Canadian Art Collection,
dated August 10, 1993, re: Executive Resolutions #E106193 and #E107/93.
(b) Letter from The Honourable Anne Swarbridk, Minister, Ministry of Culture, Tourism and
Recreation, dated August 30, 1993, re: Possible Expansion of the McMichael Canadian Art
Collection facilities.
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. PROJECT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE ALTONA FOREST ENVIRONMENTALLY
SIGNIFICANT AREA
- Landford Acres Ltd. Property
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located on the east side of Altona Road, north of Sheppard Avenue East, in
the Town of Pickering under "The Project for the Acquisition of the Altona Forest Environmentally
Significant Area ".
Res. #E147/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 17.24 acres, more or less, be purchased from
Landford Acres Ltd., said land being an irregular shaped parcel of land being Part of Lot 32,
Concession 1, Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, fronting on the east side of
Altona Road, north of Sheppard Avenue East;
THAT the acquisition price be $2,000,000.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required and obtain any additional approvals required.
AMENDMENT
Res. #E148/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Griffin
THAT the terms of purchase conform with the By -laws of the Town of Pickering
THE AMENDMENT WAS
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS
CARRIED
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 B173
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. PROJECT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE ALTONA FOREST ENVIRONMENTALLY
SIGNIFICANT AREA (CONTD.)
- Landford Acres Ltd. Property
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A80/93, #A81/93, #A83/93 and #A84/93, Authority Meeting #3/93, April 23, 1993
approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with officials of Landford Acres Ltd. and their solicitor Roger
Elliott, as well as other members of the firm Fasken, Campbell, Godfrey, Barristers and Solicitors.
The Chief Administrative Officer of the Authority has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence
with the purchase of the property.
TERMS OF PURCHASE
A summary of the salient points is as follows:
(a) The area to be purchased is to consist of a partial taking of 17.24 acres, more or Tess,
leaving a remnant parcel of 0.991 acres, more or less, in the ownership of the vendor.
(b) The purchase price is to be the sum of $2,000,000.00, with the closing date to be on or
before November 2, 1993.
(c) Landford Acres Ltd. is to have a right of first refusal for a five year period if any portion of
the purchased lands is sold. This right shall not be applicable to lands required for federal,
provincial or municipal government or other public body or any ministry agency, department
or Grant of Easement or a Right -of -Way for roads, road widening, utilities or pipelines for
water, power, sewage, oil, gas or telephone. Also, this right shall not be applicable if the
area sold is less than one acre and is sold as part of the Altona Forest land assembly.
(d) The Authority agrees not to object to an application by Landford Acres Ltd. for re- zoning of
its remaining 0.991 acre parcel and the re- zoning of it to medium density (2).
(e) The Authority is to construct an eight foot commercial grade fence around the boundary
between the lands being acquired by the Authority and the lands to be retained by Landford
Acres Ltd. at this location.
(f) Representatives of the Authority are also currently in discussions with officials of Landford
Acres Ltd. regarding the potential sale by the Authority of a 1 .453 acre remnant portion of
the former Bramalea Limited property, situate immediately to the south of the 0.991 acre
parcel being retained by Landford, which lands are outside the project boundary. The
Authority agrees that in the event Landford Acres Ltd. does not purchase the 1.453 acre
parcel, that it will remain in its natural state for a five year period, unless sold to a private
developer.
VALUATION
The lands being purchased by the Authority were acquired by Landford Acres under the following
purchases.
B174 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 •
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. PROJECT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE ALTONA FOREST ENVIRONMENTALLY
SIGNIFICANT AREA
- Landford Acres Ltd. Property
Instrument No.D279043, dated May 12, 1988 at a purchase price of $218,451.00 per acre.
Instrument No.D286106, dated July 27, 1988 at a purchase price of $162,247.00 per acre.
The Authority is in receipt of an independent valuation supporting the purchase price of
$2,000,000.00 ($116,009.00 per acre).
RATIONALE
This property is located within the acquisition boundary of the Altona Forest Environmentally
Significant Area. Staff of the Authority feel that the proposed purchase, as negotiated, is fair and
reasonable and recommend approval by the members of the Authority.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The total funding including the purchase price, ancillary costs and initial site securement costs are
available to the Authority from the $10 million dollar funding earlier advanced by the Province of
Ontario.
2. SALE OF LAND /VICINITY OF 38 GROVETREE ROAD /CITY OF ETOBICOKE
-Mary DiLorenzo
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The Metropolitan Toronto Encroachment Review Committee to explore
the possibility of a sale of a small fragment of tableland.
Res. #E149/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from The Metropolitan Toronto
Encroachment Review Committee to proceed with a sale of a small fragment of Authority -owned
tableland situate adjacent to 38 Grovetree Road in the City of Etobicoke, in The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to complete
a sale to Mary DiLorenzo in this instance;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 B175
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. SALE OF LAND /VICINITY OF 38 GROVETREE ROAD /CITY OF ETOBICOKE (CONTD.)
-Mary DiLorenzo
THAT a small fragment of Authority -owned tableland containing 0.028 acres, more or less, be sold
to Mary DiLorenzo, said land being Part of Lot 32, Concession A, Fronting the Humber, City of
Etobicoke, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
THAT the Authority request the approval of The Ministry of Natural Resources to complete the sale
of the subject land on the following terms and conditions:
(1) The sale price is to be the sum of $ 10,000.00;
(2) Mary DiLorenzo is to pay the cost of legal survey, obtaining the approval of the
Committee of Adjustment of the City of Etobicoke and all of her legal costs
involved;
(3) Completion of this sale will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be
required;
(4) The transaction is to be completed at the earliest possible date with payment in full
being made to the Authority on closing;
THAT the sale be subject to an Order In Council being issued in accordance with Section 21(c) of
the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary approvals
and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The potential disposal of this fragment of land was brought to the attention of the members of the
Executive Committee on August 13, 1991, and under Resolution #66, staff was directed to report
back to the Executive Committee recommending further action at a later date.
The subject parcel consists of a fragment of tableland being part of a much larger area acquired
from Joseph Baril in June, 1963, under Humber River Flood Plain Lands Component of the Land
Acquisition Project.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the proceeds of this sale be used to acquire high priority lands required for
approved Authority Land Acquisition Projects.
B176 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. GEORGE AND RUTH TILL - LAND EXCHANGE
-429 Rouge Hills Drive, City of Scarborough
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of request from The Metropolitan Toronto Encroachment Review Committee, to explore the
possibility of a land exchange involving small fragments of land, to resolve an encroachment
problem.
Res. #E150/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from The Metropolitan Toronto
Encroachment Review Committee to enter into an exchange of lands located in the vicinity of 429
Rouge Hills Drive in the City of Scarborough, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interest of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to proceed
with this exchange;
THAT the Authority enter into an exchange of lands on the following basis:
(a) George and Ruth Till will convey to the Authority, a parcel of land containing 0.073
acres, more or Tess, being Part of Lots 4 and 5, Registered Plan 273, City of
Scarborough, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
(b) The Authority will convey to George and Ruth Till, a parcel of land containing 0.025
acres, more or less, being Part of Lot 5, Registered Plan 273, City of Scarborough,
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
(c) George and Ruth Till to be responsible for payment of 50% of all legal, survey and
other costs involved in completion of this exchange, up to a maximum payable by
them of $2,500.00;
THAT said exchange be subject to an Order In Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of The Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter 27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary
approvals and execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The potential disposal of this small fragment of land was brought to the attention of the -- embers
of the Executive Committee on August 13, 1993, and staff, under Resolution #E133/93, were
directed to report back to the Executive Committee recommending further action at a later date.
The land being disposed of consists of a fragment of tableland from a much larger area acquired by
the Authority from John and Millward Horton in May, 1964, under the Rouge River Flood Plain
Land Component of the Land Acquisition Project.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 B177
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1987 - 1991 FLOOD PLAIN AND
CONSERVATION COMPONENT
- Etobicoke Creek Watershed
- G.O.F. Limited and 226603 Investments Limited
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located on the west side of Dixie Road, north of Dundas Street in the City of
Mississauga under "Land Acquisition Project - 1987 - 1991", Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Etobicoke Creek Watershed.
Res. #E151/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.842 acres, more or less, be purchased from
G.O.F. Limited and 226603 Investments Limited, said land being an irregular shaped parcel of land
being Part of Lot 6, Concession 1, N.D.S., City of Mississauga, Regional Municipality of Peel,
consisting of land situate on the west of Dixie Road, north of Dundas Street in the City of
Mississauga;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus legal costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #51, Authority Meeting #3, May 2, 1986, approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with Michael E. Weir of Weir Associates, Barristers, Solicitors &
Notaries, representative of the owners.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
A plan illustrating the specific location was available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 113 -25 -502 - Dixie /Dundas Channel.
B178 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. MASTER CANVAS CRAFT LIMITED
-Lease of Authority Land by The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
•
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for consideration to renew the
existing lease for an additional one year period.
Res. #E152/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority is the owner of certain lands in the City of Etobicoke in The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto on the south side of Albion Road, east of Islington Avenue;
AND WHEREAS the subject lands are under management agreement with The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto for parks and recreation purposes, in accordance with the terms of an
agreement dated
June 14, 1961;
THAT the Authority approve of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto entering into a lease
renewal agreement, commencing the 1st day of October 1993 and expiring on the 30th day of
September, 1994, on the same terms and conditions as set out in the 1991 indenture, except that
the arrangement shall now be shown as to be terminated on September 30, 1994.
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
AMENDMENT
Res. #E153/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Lois Hancey
THAT prior to any additional extensions being requested beyond September 30, 1994, a full report
on the long term plan for this area be provided.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Under Resolution #79, Authority Meeting #3/91, held May 3, 1991, the members of the Authority
authorized the lease of Authority -owned land at the above location by The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto to Master Canvas Craft Limited for a two year period, commencing the 1st
day of October, 1990 and expiring the 30th day of September, 1992.
On March 26, 1993, under Resolution #A55/93, the Members of the Authority granted a one year
extension expiring September 30, 1993, on similar terms and conditions to the earlier lease
arrangement.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 9179
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. MASTER CANVAS CRAFT LIMITED (CONTD.)
-Lease of Authority Land by The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
The subject property was acquired by the Authority on May 12, 1986, under the Flood Plain and
Valley Land Acquisition Project in the Humber River Watershed.
Master Canvas Craft Limited is the adjacent owner and the lands were initially leased by The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto without consulting the Authority through an apparent
oversight.
Extensive discussions were held with the officials of the Parks and Property Department of The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and Master Canvas Craft Limited and the earlier agreements
were arranged which will terminate as of September 30, 1993.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
In accordance with the terms and conditions of the existing agreement, no revenue or expenses
will be incurred in this instance by the Authority.
6. SOIL REMEDIATION PROJECT
- Former Domtar /Polyresins Property, Don River Watershed
KEY ISSUE
Report on the status of the negotiations to enter into an agreement with Natural Environment
Recovery Inc. (NER) to clean -up the contaminated soils at the former Domtar /Polyresins site.
Res. #E154/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDS THAT staff be directed to enter into an agreement with Natural
Environment Recovery Inc., to clean -up the contaminated soils at the former Domtar /Polyresins site
in a manner which complies with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and Energy
(MOEE) at a total estimated cost of approximately $1,338,000. of which the MTRCA share is
approximately $350,000.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In January, 1992, NER completed a bioremediation treatability study for the MTRCA, in order to
determine the feasibility of cleaning -up the former Domtar /Polyresins property. As a result of this
study and a review of previous environmental audits of the same site conducted by Trow Dames &
Moore, Intera Kenting and Beak, NER estimated that there is approximately 7000 cubic metres
(13,000 tonnes) of organically contaminated soil on the site. This soil exceeds the present MOEE
parkland use decommissioning criteria. The contaminants of concern are primarily volatile organic
compounds, including ethyl benzene, xylene and styrene, and some polynuclear hydrocarbon
compounds, including naphthalene and methylnaphthalene.
B180 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. SOIL REMEDIATION PROJECT (CONTD.)
- Former Domtar /Polyresins Property, Don River Watershed
In order to rehabilitate this site in a manner which complies with the requirements of the MOEE, the
7000 cubic metres of contaminated soil will have to be cleaned. NER's laboratory scale treatability,
study demonstrated that the soil could be cleaned to meet or exceed the MOEE's decommissioning
guidelines with respect to parkland use. Controlled laboratory scale tests demonstrated that a
99.8 percent reduction in organic contaminants of concern could be achieved by using NER's
customized microbial agents. NER estimated that it would cost $1,338,000. to clean -up the site to
parkland use standards using their proprietary technology.
In order to undertake the clean -up, NER solicited funds from the MOEE (Research and Technology
Branch) and Environment Canada (Development and Demonstration of Site Remediation
Technologies Program - DESRT), herein referred to as the DESRT Partners. On March 31, 1993,
the DESRT Partners granted NER $458,666. of the $688,000. required to complete the first half
(the Demonstration Phase) of the clean -up. The remaining $229,334. was to be contributed by
NER as a condition of receiving the grant. A further condition was that the second half (the
Commercialization Phase) of the clean -up was to be fully funded by the MTRCA. NER, aware that
MTRCA's budget for the clean -up was limited to $350,000., agreed to contribute a further
$300,000. in order to meet the budget requirements for the project. NER's willingness to
contribute financially to this project is founded in their desire to demonstrate the effectiveness of
their proprietary technology.
In order to commence the clean -up, a working agreement had to be formalized between MTRCA
and NER. At Authority Meeting #5/93 on June 25, 1993, staff were directed to negotiate an
agreement with NER to clean -up the contaminated soils at the former Domtar /Polyresins site in a
manner which complied with requirements of the MOEE.
MTRCA staff enlisted the expertise of Gardiner,Roberts to assist in drafting this agreement.
The agreement addresses matters such as:
the formal acknowledgement that the DESRT Agreement is in full force and effect and
unamended
general liability insurance for the MTRCA;
general indemnification of the MTRCA;
letters of credit;
causes for termination;
financial contribution by the respective partners;
method of payment;
covenants with respect to the commencement and operation of the soil treatment plant,
completion of the clean -up, and compliance with all the applicable regulatory guidelines;
provision for the clean -up of additional soils;
conditions of default and associated penalties;
NER liability for cost overruns;
site access.
Staff are of the opinion that this agreement adequately protects the interests of the MTRCA.
Negotiations are continuing with NER as of September 2, 1993 on several points, but it is
anticipated that the agreement will be in a mutually satisfactory form by September 24, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 B181
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. SOIL REMEDIATION PROJECT (CONTD.)
- Former Domtar /Polyresins Property, Don River Watershed
RATIONALE
It is the goal of the MTRCA to rehabilitate this site in an environmentally safe, effective and timely
manner. Staff believe that the proposal to treat the contaminated soils on site is based on well
documented biological principles, and will effectively accomplish the MTRCA's goal.
The DESRT Partners have conducted a comprehensive review of the process proposed by NER, and
have endorsed the treatment technology as a safe and effective way of treating the contaminated
soil at the former Domtar /Polyresins site. The microorganisms to be used in the clean -up are
indigenous to the site and will simply expire as food sources (contaminants) are reduced and
eventually eliminated. Furthermore the nutrient additives will be composed of naturally occurring
compounds such as nitrogen and phosphorus.
It is important to note that all of the consultants who submitted proposals to clean -up this site
advocated that the soils be treated using biological means.
Other available technologies which rely on heat treatment are not suitable for the range of
contaminants on this site.
The only realistic alternative to treating the contaminated soil on -site is to excavate and haul the
material to a licensed landfill. This option is more expensive, $120 /tonne as opposed to
$100 /tonne gross project cost and $30 /tonne net cost to MTRCA with the NER proposal. The on
site treatment is a better environmental solution and offers an opportunity to demonstrate and
develop Canadian expertise.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The DESRT Partners and NER are responsible for financing the Demonstration Phase of the clean -up
- the initial $688,000.
MTRCA and NER are responsible for financing the Commercial Phase of the clean -up - the final
$650,000. Of this subtotal, the MTRCA will be responsible for $350,000.
The agreement is structured such that should NER's treatment prove to be unsuccessful, with
success defined as a certificate of completion from the DESRT Partners for the Demonstration
Phase of the clean -up, the MTRCA will be released from their financial obligations.
In total MTRCA, NER, and the DESRT Partners will be contributing $350,000., $529,334., and
$458,666. respectively to the clean -up. Funds have been set aside, since the time of. purchase, in
a special site rehabilitation reserve account. The account number is 004 -21.
B182 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
7. LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 -1994
- Colonel Samuel Smith Waterfront Park Promenade, Tender ED93 -09
KEY ISSUE
Report of the Tender Opening Sub - Committee for Tender ED93 -09 (Appendix TO.13/93) and staff
recommendations.
Res. #E155/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Tender ED93 -09 for the Colonel Samuel Smith
Park Promenade Boardwalk be awarded to Gateman Milloy for $319,818.08 (including GST);
AND FURTHER THAT the Tender ED93 -09 for the optional work for the pedestrian bridge also be
awarded to Gateman Milloy for $72,000 (excluding GST), subject to the approval of reallocating
surplus funds from other waterfront capital projects.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Tenders were advertised for the construction of the public promenade at Colonel Sar niel Smith
Park. The work generally includes the installation of interlocking paving stones and _.. iciated
works for a 6 metre wide by 235 metre long walkway, including two look out areas.
RATIONALE
The Authority's consultant for this project, H. Sustronk & Associates (1980) Ltd., has reviewed the
tender results and three references for the low bidder, Gateman Milloy. The consultant
recommends the contract for the public promenade and the pedestrian bridge be awarded to
Gateman Milloy.
The estimates for this tender were $375,000. for the promenade and $80,000. for the pedestrian
bridge.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available up to $200,000. from jobsOntario Capital and this amount will be matched by
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. Funding is also available in the Lake Ontario Waterfront
Regeneration Project 1992 -1994 under Account No. 204 -30.
Funding for the pedestrian bridge will be subject to the availability of surplus funds from other
waterfront capital projects.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 B183
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
8. MEETING SCHEDULE 1994 -95
KEY ISSUE
To provide a Schedule of Meetings for the forthcoming Authority year, beginning February 25,
1994 and ending February 23, 1995.
Res. #E156/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Brian Harrison
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Schedule of Meetings 1994 -95, dated
September 2, 1993 be approved;
AND FURTHER THAT the Secretary- Treasurer distribute this schedule at the earliest opportunity to
all agencies who appoint members to The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
CARRIED
RATIONALE
Since almost all members of the Authority sit on Councils, Boards or Committees which meet on
days other than Friday, we have arranged this schedule to accommodate all Authority meetings on
Friday. Full Authority meetings have been scheduled for the fourth Friday of the month, and
Executive Committee Meetings on the second Friday of the month.
The Finance and Administration Advisory Board Meetings will be held at 8:30 a.m., with the
exception of the September 30, 1994 meeting which will be at 10:00 a.m. All other meetings will
be held at 10:00 a.m.
9. ENVIRONMENTAL BILL OF RIGHTS
KEY ISSUE
The proposed Environmental Bill -of- Rights (EBR) and its potential to impact on the programs of the
Authority.
Res. #E157/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Lois Griffin
THAT the staff report, dated August 30, 1993, respecting the proposed Environmental Bill of
Rights be received and that staff be requested to keep the Executive Committee advised of the
progress of this provincial initiative.
CARRIED
B184 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 •
SECTION 1I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. ENVIRONMENTAL BILL OF RIGHTS (CONTD.)
BACKGROUND
On October 1, 1991 the Ontario Government announced the creation of an Environmental Bill -of-
Rights Task Force made up of representatives from business, environmental groups, the legal
profession and government. A draft Bill was developed and introduced to the Legislature in July,
1992. Public comment was invited and a final Bill submitted to the House in the May, 1993.
The following is a summary of the significant inclusions within the Bill. It:
establishes a requirement for public notice of and public access to information, with
regard to the consideration of and decisions on matters subject to the legislation,
through an electronic registry;
creates an Environmental Commissioner, to be appointed for a five year period by
the Legislative Assembly, who will have the power to hold government accountable
for compliance and who will annually prepare a report assessing the cooperation of
ministries and their compliance to the requirements of the EBR;
requires each Ministry to develop and adopt a Statement of Environmental Values;
requires public notice be placed on the registry of any proposed Acts; policies and
regulations that are environmentally significant; and for instruments subject, by
regulation, to EBR;
establishes a minimum 30 day notification period;
establishes a public appeal procedure for any person having "an interest" in a
decision to issue an instrument if they can demonstrate that the decision was
unreasonable or that it will result in significant environmental damage;
allows the public to sue an alleged polluter or other person suspected of breaking an
existing law and causing significant damage to a public resource;
expands protection to workers who "blow the whistle" on polluting employers.
IMPACT ON AUTHORITY PROGRAMS
The Conservation Authorities Act, as one of the pieces of legislation administered by the Ministry
of Natural Resources (MNR), has been prescribed for the purposes of section 16 and Part V of the
proposed Bill of Rights (EBR) effective April 1, 1996.
Section 16 states:
(1) If a minister considers that a proposal under consideration in his or her ministry for a
regulation under a prescribed Act could, if implemented, have a signifir 't effect on
the environment, the minister shall do everything in his or her power tc give notice
of the proposal to the public at least thirty days before the proposal is implemented.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 B185
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. ENVIRONMENTAL BILL OF RIGHTS (CONTD.)
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a regulation that is predominantly financial or
administrative in nature.
Part V of the Bill establishes a procedure for "any two persons resident in Ontario who believe that
a prescribed Act, regulation or instrument has been contravened" to apply to the Environmental
Commissioner for an investigation by the "appropriate minister ".
In developing the legislation, the Task Force met regularly with an interministerial committee,
representing the various ministries that would ultimately be affected. It was not, however, until
early in 1993 that conservation authorities were invited to participate directly in this process. By
that time, the proposed provisions of the legislation had be identified.
Authority staff provided comments to the Task Force in 1992 and recently, to the interministerial
committee, in conjunction with the Association of Conservation Authorities of Ontario, identifying a
number of concerns with this proposed legislation. Specifically, the potential impact of the
additional process requirements on authority projects and service delivery standards; the potential
operational and cost implications of the electronic registry; a lack of clarity with respect to
inclusions and exclusions of "instruments "; the lack of understanding of the relationship between
conservation authorities and the Ministry of Natural Resources and of the diversity amongst and
autonomy of conservation authorities; and the existence of current legislation which could, through
stronger enforcement and minor amendments, accomplish the same objectives.
There are a number of definitions which are provided in the legislation, including:
instrument: any document of legal effect issued under an Act..a permit, licence, approval,
authorization, direction or order issued under an Act...does not include a regulation;
policy: a program, plan or objective and includes guidelines or criteria to be used in making
decisions about the issuance, amendment or revocation of instruments;
regulation: as in the Regulations Act.
There are a number of questions which have been raised by conservation authorities, but which
have yet to be addressed. This results, largely, from the fact that the legislation was not prepared
by a provincial ministry but rather by a Task Force established, purposely by government, to
develop a process to allow public input to and to monitor the decisions of provincial ministries.
The Authority could be impacted both as a proponent of projects and as a reviewer and permitting
agency with respect to the works of others. At its most rigorous, the Bill could require all projects,
all policies, technical guidelines and /or criteria used by the Authority in its decision making to be
placed on the registry for review as well as every permit application.
In discussions with MNR and the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MOEE), its appears that
there may be exclusions in situations where the project or the permit implements something that
has been part of a prior approval process which incorporated public participation and review.
B186 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. ENVIRONMENTAL BILL OF RIGHTS (CONTD.)
Provincial ministries are currently identifying what of their work they will recommend be included or
excluded under the Bill. MNR is also responsible for identifying inclusions and exclusions for
conservation authorities. To date, however, they have been more concerned with respect to the
impacts on their own work and have not given full consideration to ours. The ACAO will be
following up with MNR.
Authority staff continue to work with the Association of Conservation Authorities of Ontario to
determine our future requirements and the associated operational procedures and costs.
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Res. #E158/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT the permit applications listed herein as (A) to (L) inclusive, and added permit applications (M)
to (P) inclusive, with the exception of (J) and (1) which were withdrawn, be approved, in
accordance to the information contained within the reports.
CARRIED
(A) Broadway Farms Ltd., c/o Jim Livingston
To construct within a flood plain, on Part East Half Lot 21, Concession 2 EHS, (12698
Heart Lake Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as f' sated on property
owned by same, for the purpose of constructing a four strand, suspensic tensile fence to
restrict farm animal access within the Regional Storm flood plain of a tributary of the
Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Jim Livingston; received on August 20, 1993.
(2) High - Tensile Wire Fencing Detail; prepared by Ontario High Tensile Fencing Company;
received on August 27, 1993.
(B) 799419 Ontario Ltd., c/o D. Mamais
To place fill within a regulated area, on Part Lot 9, Concession 1 EHS, (496 Main Street
North), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed, as located on property owned
by same, for the purpose of site grading in conjunction with the construction of an animal
hospital.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by F.J. Reinders and Associates Canada Ltd.; Drawing Nos. 93041 -SP -1,
Revision 5 and 93041 -SP -2, Revision 0, dated 08/13/93 received on August 17, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 8187
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(C) Cara Foods Limited
To construct within a flood plain, on Part Lot 5, Concession 1 N.D.S., (1505 Dundas Street
East), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed, as located on property
owned by same, for the purpose of constructing a "drive -thru" window addition to the
existing restaurant, within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Little Etobicoke Creek.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Greg Dell & Associates; Project No. 2262; Drawing Nos. 1, 2 and 3,
dated December 15, 1992; received on June 30, 1993.
(D) Robert & Andree Fitzhenry
To construct within a flood plain, on Part Lot 9, Concession 1 EYS, (83 Plymbridge Road),
in the City of North York, Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by same, for
the purpose of replacing an existing garage.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Fitzhenry Residence Site Plan; prepared by Brian Williams; Drawing A -1, dated May 26,
1993; received July 13, 1993.
(2) Fitzhenry Residence Garage Plan; prepared by Brian Williams; Drawing A -2, dated May 26,
1993; received July 13, 1993.
(E) Seneca College of Auulied Arts and Technology
To alter a watercourse, on Part Lot 11, Concession 3, (13990 Dufferin Street North), in the
Township of King, Humber River Watershed, as located on property owned by same, for
the purpose of constructing a stormwater outlet.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Seneca College Site and Grading Plans; prepared by R.V. Anderson and Associates; Project
No. 3299; Drawing Nos. 1 - 5; revised as received on August 30, 1993.
(F) Marcia & William McVean
To construct within a flood plain, on Lot 22, Registered Plan 202, (3 George Street, Oak
Ridges), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by same, for the purpose of constructing an addition.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan, McVean Residence and Proposed Addition, 3 George Street, Richmond Hill;
prepared by applicant; received August 20, 1993.
(2) Proposed Addition Details, McVean Residence, 3 George Street, Richmond Hill; prepared by
applicant; received August 20, 1993.
B188 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(G) Ian Dalrymple
To place fill within a regulated area, on Lot 18, Registered Plan 6037, (21 Glenbourne Park
Drive), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed, as located on property owned by
same, for the purpose of filling in a bypass channel.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan, Lot 18, Plan 6037, Showing Location of Bypass Channel to be Filled; prepared by
applicant, received November 27, 1992.
(2) Red Line Revision, Cross - section A, Lot 18, Plan 6037; prepared by applicant; received
November 27, 1993.
(H) J. Wisnicki, Dr. A.W. Corn and L. Vance
To place fill within a regulated area, on Blocks E and F, Registered Plan M -328, (2619,
2615 & 2613 Lakeshore Boulevard West), in the City of Etobicoke, Lake Ontario
Waterfront, as located on property owned by same, for the purpose of placing rock fill for
shoreline erosion protection.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan; prepared by the Ontario Construction Co. Ltd.; Drawing W -1, dated August 23, 1993,
revision dated September 9, 1993, received September 9, 1993.
(2) Letter from The Ontario Construction Co. Ltd., dated and received on September 9, 1993.
(I) Stephen Goldhar
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 46, Registered Plan 2335, (107 Mildenhall
Road), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by
same, for the purpose of placing fill behind a proposed retaining wall.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Timber Retaining Wall Plan, prepared by Victoria Lister Carley, Landscape Architect;
received on August 25, 1993.
(J) The Woodbine Emporium Corporation
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse, on Part Lot 10, Concession
3, (8409 Woodbine Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed, as located
on property owned by same, for the purpose of placing fill in the flood plain and
constructing an outfall.
Withdrawn, information not received.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 B189
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(K) Trevelvan Beard
To construct within a flood plain, on Part Lot 10, Concession 7, (2 Fisher Court), in the
Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed, as located on property owned by same, for the
purpose of reconstructing a basement
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Red Line Revision Site Plan, 2 Fisher Court, Markham; prepared by applicant; received
August 26, 1993.
(2) Basement Plan, 2 Fisher Court, Markham; prepared by applicant; received August 26,
1993.
(3) Notes: Replacement of Basement Walls and Floors, 2 Fisher Court, Markham; prepared by
applicant; received August 26, 1993.
(L) Cedar Brae Golf Club
To place fill within a regulated area, on Part Lots 12 & 13; Concession 5; Lot 12,
Concession 4, (Steeles Avenue at Staines Road), in the City of Scarborough, Rouge River
Watershed, as located on property owned by same, for the purpose of modifying specific
areas of the existing golf course.
Withdrawn, information not received.
(M) The City of Mississauga - Transportation and Works Department
To place fill within a regulated area, alter a watercourse, and construct in a flood plain on
Part Lot 2, Concession 1, (Eastgate Parkway Extension), in the City of Mississauga,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed, as located on property owned by John McLennan Limited, for
the purpose of placing fill within registered fill lines in conjunction with the installation of a
3000 millimetre diameter concrete storm sewer and altering the channel of the Etobicoke
Creek by the construction of a stormwater outfall structure within the Regional Storm flood
plain.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by M.M. Dillon Ltd.; Project No. 2919; Plan Nos. C -28958 and C -28959
dated November, 1992; Plan No. C -28960 dated March, 1993; received on August 6,
1993.
(2) Planting Plan for Outfall; prepared by M.M. Dillon Ltd.; Drawing No. 93 -1; received on
August 6, 1993.
B190 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE !7/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993
SECTION I1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(N) Mr. & Mrs. Yip
To place fill within a regulated area, on Lot 22, Registered Plan M -1739, (18 Moodie Drive),
in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same,
for the purpose of removing a pool.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Red Line Revision Addition and Renovation to Mr. & Mrs. Yip Residence, 18 Moodie Drive,
Richmond Hill, 2nd Floor Plan Sections, Site Plan; prepared by Louis Cheung, Architect Inc.;
Job No. 9306; Sheet A -2, dated August, 1993; received September 1, 1993.
(0) Scarborough Public Utilities Commission
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 5, Concession 2, (Kirkham Road Bridge across the
Rouge River), in the City of Scarborough, Rouge River Watershed, as located on property
owned by same, for the purpose of installing a new 400 mm diameter watermain.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Proposed Watermain Bypass Plan and Profile; prepared by The Scarborough Public Utilities
Commission; Drawing No. WL92 -073, Sheet 1 of 1; revised as received on
September 1, 1993.
(P) Marion Mason
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 13, Concession 5, (256 Main Street), in the Town
of Markham, Rouge River Watershed, as located on property owned by same for the
purposes of constructing a single family residential house and a garage.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Redline Revised Site and Grading Plan for 256 Main Street; prepared by Flanagan Beresford
and Patterson, Architects; Sheet Nos. 93- 164- 01 -92, 93- 164 -06; revised as received on
August 30, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 17/93, SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 B191
NEW BUSINESS
DON VALLEY BRICKWORKS REGENERATION PROJECT
Res. #E159/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT staff file a formal application with jobsOntario seeking the provincial share of the Don Valley
Brickworks regeneration project costs as soon as possible and submit a report concerning the
current plans for the site to the Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board on
October 15, 1993.
CARRIED
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:10 a.m., September 10, 1993.
William B. Granger J. D. Dillane
Chair Acting Secretary- Treasurer
/bb.
c.
Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
OCTOBER 8, 1993
minutes
B192
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #8/93
The Executive Committee met at the Authority office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday,
October 8, 1993. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:
Chair William Granger
Vice Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
Richard O'Brien
Paul Palleschi
ABSENT: Jim Witty
MINUTES
Res. #E160/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #7/93 be approved.
Lois Hancey
Richard O'Brien
CARRIED
B193 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995 FLOOD
PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT
- Campbell Osier Property, Duffins Creek Watershed
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located south of the Uxbridge /Pickering town line in the Glen Major Area
under the Interim Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1993 -1995 Flood Plain and
Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed.
Res. #E161/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 4.1 acres, more or less, be acquired from
Campbell Osier, said land being a rectangular shaped parcel of land being part of the road
allowance between Lots 6 and 7, Concession 9, Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of
Durham;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus legal costs with an income tax receipt
being provided for the appraised value of the land;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A97/93, Authority Meeting #4/93, May 28, 1993, approving the project.
The subject parcel is a lengthy strip of land situate between two large parcels currently in the
ownership of the Authority. The acquisition of this parcel of privately owned former road
allowance, allows the Authority to link the two existing parcels with much improved access.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner and his solicitor Doug Turner and subject to the
approval of your Committee, an agreement has now been reached with respect to acquisition.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B194
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995 FLOOD
PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT (CONTD.)
- Campbell Osler Property, Duffins Creek Watershed
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved Master Plan for Acquisition and consists of
a strategic linkup parcel.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The funding of this purchase will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502.
2. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 - 1995 FLOOD
PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT
-High Glen Developments Limited and Rossland Real Estate Limited, Rouge River Watershed
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located north of Finch Avenue, west of Sewelis Road, in the City of
Scarborough under Interim Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1993 - 1995 Flood Plain
and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed.
Res. #E162/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.674 acres, more or less, be purchased from
High Glen Developments Limited and Rossland Real Estate Limited, said land being an irregular
shaped parcel of land being Part of Block 281, Registered Plan 66M -2228, City of Scarborough,
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, consisting of land situate north of Finch Avenue, west of
Sewells Road;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT the Authority's solicitors Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to
complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental
to closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
B195 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 - 1995 FLOOD
PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT (CONTD.)
-High Glen Developments Limited and Rossland Real Estate Limited, Rouge River Watershed
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A97/93, Authority Meeting #4/93, May 28, 1993, approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with Doris L. Baughan of Borden & Elliott, Barristers and
Solicitors representative of the owners.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
A plan illustrating the specific location was available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004 -11- 502 -Flood Control Hazard Account.
3. SALE OF LAND
- Former Estate of John G. Osler, Sarah and Ernest Leyshon- Hughes Property, Town of
Pickering
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of Offer to Purchase concerning the potential disposal of land situate on the west side of
Sideline #4, Town of Pickering, in the Regional Municipality of Durham.
Res. #E163/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of an Offer to Purchase a 2 1/2 acre remnant parcel of
the Former Estate of John G. Oster and Sarah and Ernest Leyshon- Hughes property, being Part of
Lot 5, Concession 9, Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham from Glen Major Inn Inc;
THAT the subject land be sold to Glen Major Inc. on the following basis:
(a) The sale price is to be the sum of $125,000;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B196
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. SALE OF LAND (CONTD.)
- Former Estate of John G. Oster, Sarah and Ernest Leyshon- Hughes Property, Town of
Pickering
(b) The transaction is to be completed on or before November 30, 1993.
AND FURTHER THAT appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary approvals
and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The availability of the subject property was advertised publicly for sale by the Authority during the
month of August 1993 and the following offers were received:
Mr. Harjinder Singh Bilkhu
Mr. Irwin Warsh
$ 2,500.00
531,000.00
At Authority Meeting #7/93, held on August 27, 1993, staff was directed to return the deposits
received from the two prospective purchasers who submitted offers through the public tender
process and to continue to negotiate with all parties who expressed an interest in the purchase of
the land during the public tender process and any other parties who might be interested in
purchasing the land.
The two prospective purchasers through the public tender process were advised of the direction of
the Authority by letter dated September 3, 1993, and since that date, meetings and discussions
have been held with a number of parties concerning the potential sale of this land.
The offer at hand is within the estimated market value range of $115,000. to $135,000. provided
to the Authority by a qualified appraiser.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The funds generated from this sale will be utilized to assist in paying the outstanding $200,000.
commitment remaining from the purchase of the Estate of John G. Oster Property of which the
subject is a remnant parcel.
B197 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND
-West side of Glen Major Road, Township of Uxbridge
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of Offer to Purchase concerning the potential disposal of surplus Authority land, situate on
the west side of Glen Major Road, Township of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of Durham.
Res. #E164/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority, is in receipt of an Offer to Purchase from the Glen Major Inn Inc.
concerning the sale of the surplus portion of the former Fiss property, containing .85 acres, more
or Tess, being Part of Village Lot 3, Plan of Glensharrard and Part of Lot 2, Concession 7, Township
of Uxbridge, Regional Municipality of Durham;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to complete a
sale to Glen Major Inn Inc. in this instance;
THAT a parcel of Authority -owned land containing a total of .85 acres, more or less, be sold to
Glen Major Inc. on the following basis:
(a) the sale price is to be the amount of $75,000., together with the conveyance to the
Authority of two parcels of land, containing a total of 32 acres, more or less of vacant land
said lands being Parts of Lots 3 and 4, Concession 7, Township of Uxbridge, Regional
Municipality of Durham;
(b) the proposed purchaser is to be responsible for any and all costs of demolition of the
buildings on the property being purchased if required;
(c) completion of this sale will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be required;
(d) the transaction is to be completed at the earliest possible date with payment in full being
made to the Authority on closing.
THAT the sale be subject to an Order In Council being issued in accordance with Section 21(C) of
the Conservation Authorities Act R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary approvals
and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B198
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND (CONTD.)
-West side of Glen Major Road, Township of Uxbridge
BACKGROUND
The availability of the surplus Authority owned lot at this location, was publicly advertised for sale
during the month of August, with the following proposals being received:
Mr. Charanjit Kaur Bilkhu
Jeff and Debra Henry
Mr. Delmo W. Albino
$1,000.00
$21,000.00
$70,000.00
Glen Major Inn Inc. - 22 acres of land proposed to be deeded to the Authority with no cash
payment. Glen Major Inn Inc. estimated the value of the land at
$150,000.00.
At the Authority meeting held on August 27, 1993, staff was directed to return the deposits
received from prospective purchasers through the public tender process, to continue to negotiate
with all parties who expressed an interest in the purchase of this land during the public tender
process and any other parties who might be interested in purchasing the land.
The four prospective purchasers through the public tender process were advised of the direction of
the members of the Authority by letter dated September 1, 1993, and since that date, meetings
and discussions have been held with a number of parties concerning the potential sale of this land.
The parcel of land being offered for conveyance to the Authority in this instance abuts Authority
owned lands immediately adjacent. The lands are environmentally significant and are situate within
the Authority's Master Plan of Acquisition.
A current independent appraisal of the surplus Authority owned lot is at hand indicating the
estimated market value of the subject lot at 5100,000. to $120,000.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The funding generated from this sale will be utilized to pay the balance of the outstanding
$200,000. commitment remaining from the purchase of the Estate of John G. Oster property in the
Glen Major Headwaters area of the Duffins Creek Watershed.
B199 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93 •
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
5. HEADWATERS CONFERENCE II
- November 2, 1993
KEY ISSUE
Attendance at the "headwaters CONFERENCE II" on Tuesday, November 2, 1993, to be held at the
Monora Park Pavilion in Mono Township.
Res. #E165/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THAT Donna Patterson and Marie Muir, members of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority, be authorized to attend the "headwaters CONFERENCE II" on November 2,
1993, in Mono Township, Ontario, and that their expenses in this connection be paid.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The "headwaters CONFERENCE II" is hosted by Mono Township and is a follow -up to the
conference held two years ago.
Registrations are now being accepted for the conference and authorization is required to permit
Authority members to attend the conference and to have their related expenses paid. Donna
Patterson and Marie Muir, members of the Authority, have expressed an interest in attending this
conference.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The total registration cost is $ 180. and funding is available in account No. 001 -03 -352.
6. SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LANDS
- Fairport Beach Area, Town of Pickering
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of Offers to Purchase, concerning the potential disposal of surplus Authority lands situate
in the Fairport Beach area, Town of Pickering, in The Regional Municipality of Durham.
Res. #E166/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THAT the staff report dated September 29, 1993 be received and that a further report be
submitted to the Members of the Authority with respect to the offers received through the tender
process.
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B200
SECTION I1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
6. SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS (CONTD.)
- Fairport Beach Area, Town of Pickering
BACKGROUND
At Authority meeting #1/92, held on February 21, 1992, certain parcels of Authority owned land
situate beyond the current boundaries of the Authority's Lake Ontario Waterfront requirements
were declared surplus as to the requirements of the Authority. This decision was made after
extensive public consultation, in accordance with Authority policy for land disposal.
In accordance with the comments received during the public consultation process, staff were
directed: "That preference be given wherever possible to sales or exchanges being made at market
value to the following:
(a) remaining private owners situate within the acquisition boundary;
(b) abutting property owners;
(c) former owners of the subject lands."
A satisfactory offer from one of the abutting owners was received and a sale of that parcel was
successfully completed earlier in 1993. A second abutting owner who had earlier indicated an
interest in purchasing an adjacent parcel subsequently withdrew her request.
The availability of the remaining surplus Authority owned lands at this location was advertised
publicly for sale during late 1992. Upon reviewing the offers received, it was brought to the
attention of the Authority staff, that certain lots on registered plans had merged. In discussions
with the Town of Pickering, it was agreed that the Town would assist the Authority in reinstating
the lots to their original status. The required legal work was only recently finalized by the Town.
In accordance with the earlier direction of the members of the Authority, all parties who earlier
expressed an interest in the purchase of the subject lands during the public tender process were
again advised of the availability of the lands and invited to submit sealed offers to the attention of
the Chief Administrative Officer of the Authority before 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 7, 1993.
Any and all offers received were be opened publicly at Tender Opening Sub - Committee Meeting
#8/93 held prior to the Executive Committee Meeting.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the proceeds from these sales be used to assist in funding the acquisition of
properties within the acquisition boundary where owners have expressed an interest in selling to
the Authority at this time.
B201 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. 1993 WATERFRONT MONITORING PROGRAM
- Tender Opening Sub - Committee
- Tender RMS 93/02, Benthic Invertebrate Taxonomic Identification
KEY ISSUE
Tender Opening Sub - Committee #7/93 (TO.15/93) opened tenders for the Benthic Invertebrate
Taxonomic Identification contract required for the 1993 Waterfront Monitoring Program. The
tenders received were referred to staff for review and a report.
Res. #E167/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
THAT the firm of BII Consultants Ltd. be retained for Benthic Invertebrate Taxonomic Identification
required for the 1993 Waterfront Monitoring Program at an upset limit of $ 12,095.25.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Since 1975, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has conducted
environmental monitoring programs to describe biological, physical and chemical conditions in the
vicinity of waterfront parks. Special studies have been conducted to examine the sediment quality,
water quality, sediment deposition rates, bottom substrate documentation, biomonitoring surveys
using freshwater clams, and currents associated with waterfront parks. The 1993 Program
includes analyses forming part of the environmental studies in the Col. Sam Smith Waterfront Park.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Quotations were solicited and received from the following laboratories:
BII Consultants Ltd.
Beak Consultants Ltd.
Integrated Exploratior
Invertebrate Taxonomic Services
MacLaren Planreach Inc.
$12,095.25
12,786.50
13,161.00
24,325.00
(unable to quote at this time).
Funds are available under various waterfront accounts, including 240 -01, 601 -70.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B202
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. DON RIVER WATERSHED REGENERATION MANAGEMENT PLANS
KEY ISSUE
Award of a contract to carry out the Don River Watershed Regeneration Management Plans.
RECOMMENDATION
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the firm of Gartner Lee Limited, in association with Paul Cosburn and
Associates, be retained for the preparation of the Don River Watershed Regeneration Management
Plans at an upset limit of $89,880.00, including applicable taxes, plus an additional allowance of
$5,000. for any additional public meetings which may be required to support the public
involvement.
MOTION
Res. #E168/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the motion be amended and split.
MOTION
Res. #E169/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Lorna Jackson
CARRIED
Lois Hancey
Lorna Jackson
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the firm of Gartner Lee Limited, in association with Paul Cosburn and
Associates, be retained for the preparation of the Don River Watershed Regeneration Management
Plans at an upset limit of $89,880.00, including applicable taxes.
AMENDMENT
Moved by:
Seconded by:
CARRIED
Lois Hancey
Lorna Jackson
THAT an allowance of $5,000. for any additional public meetings which may be required to
support the public involvement be assigned to a special contingency fund for that purpose.
NOT CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 1989, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority recommended a Greenspace
Strategy to address the conservation of the Lake Ontario waterfront, the river valleys and the Oak
Ridges Moraine Complex. The Greenspace Strategy identified the need for greater cooperation to
achieve comprehensive and integrated natural resource management planning. The Strategy
proposed that the Authority:
• assume the coordinating role between the Province and municipalities in natural
resource management; and
• establish planning task forces for each major river watershed.
B203 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93
SECTION I1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. DON RIVER WATERSHED REGENERATION MANAGEMENT PLANS (CONTD.)
The public interest in the regeneration of the Don watershed, the support of The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto, the provincial ministries and others resulted in the Authority's decision to
establish a Don Watershed Task Force in 1992.
The goal of the Authority through the Don Watershed Task Force is to develop a management
strategy for the Don River watershed which will be adopted and supported by municipal and
agency staff, politicians; watershed residents; and special interest groups.
The Authority directed the Task Force to include within the strategy document:
• specific management actions required to protect and Zink the resources within the watershed;
• management actions to address water and watershed based issues;
• agencies responsible for implementation of the recommended actions;
• the development of conceptual management plans for each of the seven tributary watersheds.
In 1993, the Task Force developed a draft vision, a set of principles and a background chapter for
the regeneration of the watershed. The vision and principles establish a new direction for the Don
watershed and its valley and stream corridors.
The Task Force members identified a list of issues which they would attempt to address in the
strategy. Working in three groups, the members developed draft strategies addressing water, flora
and fauna, community and institutional issues. These strategies are currently being refined for
broad scale public review and will be circulated to Authority members in October.
These strategies together with the vision, principles, and background chapter form the first half of
the Watershed Strategy document. The final half of the document will consist of the specific
management recommendations required by the Authority for the seven tributary watersheds.
These plans will provide a five to ten year guide for identifying regeneration needs and
opportunities. The purpose of this contract is to develop those management plans based on the
draft watershed vision, principles, strategies and a consultation process which will involve
residents, and other watershed stakeholders.
The products required from this study are:
Watershed Overview - This will serve as an integration and synthesis of the seven
tributary watersheds which emphasise components linking the tributary watersheds.
Seven Tributary Watershed Reports - For each tributary watershed, a technical
report will be required which clearly identifies and integrates actions required
throughout the drainage basin of the tributary watershed as well as within valley
and stream corridors.
The report will clearly prioritize the actions required by agencies, municipalities and
others as appropriate. These actions may range along a continuum from changes to
Official Plans to on site work. These reports will contain notes and maps on the
valley and stream corridors.
Tributary Watershed Report Summaries - Summaries of the Tributary Watershed
Reports which can be incorporated into the final Watershed Strategy Document.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B204
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. DON RIVER WATERSHED REGENERATION MANAGEMENT PLANS (CONTD.)
Reports on Six Concept Plans - These may be stand alone or integrated into the
Tributary Watershed Reports. Short summaries for each site will also be required
for the final Watershed Strategy Document.
Digital Files - Digital files of all new inventory information or provision of this
information in a form that can be digitized.
Mapping and Illustrations - All mapping and other illustrations will be provided in a
reproducible form.
Consultant Selection Process
The Terms of Reference were provided to the Commissioners of Works, Planning and Recreation
Departments within the Don River watershed, for their information in September.
The Don Watershed Task Force members were circulated with initial draft terms of reference for
review. At Meeting #6/93, the Task Force recommended:
Resolution #22/93
"THAT the Draft Terms of Reference be received for information;
THAT staff circulate the Draft Terms of Reference to municipal staff and other
agencies for comment;
THAT staff be directed to hire a consultant to undertake the work as detailed in the
final Terms of Reference;
AND FURTHER THAT four members of the Don Watershed Task Force assist staff
with the selection of a consultant."
A Task Force Selection Committee was established which included:
Joan King, Councillor Metropolitan Toronto (Don Watershed Task Force member alternate)
Margaret Casey, Task Force Watershed (Don Watershed Task Force member)
Carl Knipfel (City of Scarborough - Don Watershed Task Force appointment)
Paul Nodwell (City of Markham staff)
Mark Wilson (Chair, Don Watershed Task Force)
David Dyce (MTRCA staff).
Letters were sent to 28 firms inviting them to submit a letter of interest. An information meeting,
conducted by staff of the Authority, was held on Monday, August 30.
The Task Force Selection committee met and reviewed the ten letters of interest received. Five
firms were asked to submit full proposals. One of these teams, Marshall Macklin Monaghan
Limited and LGL Limited, withdrew on the day of the proposal deadline of Wednesday,
September 29, 1993.
B205
OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. DON RIVER WATERSHED REGENERATION MANAGEMENT PLANS (CONTD.)
The following four proposals were received:
CONSULTING FIRM/TEAM
TOTAL COST INCLUDING G.S.T.
BEAK CONSULTANTS with
• Geomatics International Inc.
• Ogilvie, Ogilvie & Company
• Todhunter, Schollen & Associates
• Weintein, Leeming & Associates
'
588,010.00
GARTNER LEE LIMITED with
• Paul Cosburn & Associates
$89,880.00
HOUGH STANSBURY WOODLAND LIMITED with
• Gore & Storrie Limited
589,980.00
LANDPLAN COLLABORATIVE with
• Geomatics International Inc.
• Dames & Moore Canada
$89,209.23
The Consultant Selection Committee and staff have reviewed the proposals, and have conducted
interviews with the four teams on Monday, October 4, 1993.
Each firm /team was evaluated according to the following criteria:
• The ability to meet the Task Force's timing.
• Demonstrated knowledge and experience in environmental and planning issues within
the Don River watershed or with watershed strategy development.
• Demonstrated knowledge and experience in evaluating technical and environmental
data, and interpreting and synthesizing this data for use in addressing environmental
issues from an ecosystem perspective.
• Demonstrated knowledge and expertise in watershed regeneration and management
work including experience in urban environments.
• Innovative approach /ideas and creativity.
• Graphic capability.
• Commitment to public involvement.
• Appropriaten cs of the consulting team's skill and experience taking into account
diverse discii as involved.
• Proposed fee.
• Willingness to sign standard agreement.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B206
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. DON RIVER WATERSHED REGENERATION MANAGEMENT PLANS (CONTD.)
The Selection Committee and staff are recommending that the firm of Gartner Lee Limited, in
association with Paul Cosburn and Associates be retained as they demonstrated the best ability to
meet the terms of reference.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The contract has been divided into two phases. Phase one funds ($70,000.) are available under
account code 118 -10. Phase two funds ($20,000.) have been budgeted for in 1994 funding.
9. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995 FLOOD
PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT
- Kleinburg Hills Estates Limited Property, Humber River Valley
KEY ISSUE
Availability for purchase of property located north of Nashville Road between Highway #27 and
Huntington Road in the Humber River Valley, under the Interim Greenspace Protection and
Acquisition Project 1993 -1995 Flood Plain and Conservation Component - Humber River
Watershed.
Res. #E170/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Committee consider this item in closed session.
The board rose from closed session.
Res. #E172/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT Res. #E171193, as resolved in closed session, be ratified.
Lorna Jackson
Lois .Griffin
CARRIED
Richard O'Brien
Lois Hancey
ON A RECORDED VOTE YEA NAY
Lois Griffin Brian Harrison
Lois Hancey
Lorna Jackson
Richard O'Brien
Paul Palleschi
William Granger
THE MOTION WAS CARRIED
8207 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
KEY ISSUE
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such
area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be approved or refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority,
the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Res. #E173/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Paul Palleschi
THAT permit applications listed herein as (A) to (Z) inclusive, with the exception of (Y) which has
been withdrawn, and added permit applications (AA) to (FF) inclusive, be granted in accordance
with Ontario Regulation 158 for the period of October 8, 1993 to October 7, 1995 in accordance
with the information contained within the reports.
CARRIED
(A) The Regional Municipality of Peel - Public Works Department
To place fill within a regulated area and alter a watercourse on Part Lots 20 and 22,
Concession 6 EHS, (west side of Airport Road, Between the Hamlets of Mayfield and
Sandhill), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to place fill within a regulated area and to alter the channel of Salt Creek at three
locations, in connection with the installation of a sanitary trunk sewer.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by KMK Consultants Ltd.; Project No. 1707.01, Plan No. 1707.01 -A -21,
Sheet 11; Plan No. 1707.01 -A -28, Sheet 18; Plan 1707.01 -A -29, Sheet 19; Plan No.
1707.01 -A -61, Sheets 48 and 49 dated September 14, 1993 and received September 17,
1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B208
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(B) 846456 Ontario Limited
To alter a watercourse on Part East Y2 Lot 13, Concession 2 EHS, (Southwest corner
Sandalwood Parkway and Heart Lake Road), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse by installing a stormwater management pond and outfall, in
conjunction with the development of the Donnelly East Subdivision.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by KMK Consultants Ltd.; Drawing No's 1603 -A -35, Sheet No. 12,
Revision 1; Drawing 1603.01 -A -36, Sheet 13, Revision 2, dated July 20, 1993; Drawing
1603.01 -A -37, Sheet 21; Drawing 1603.01 -A -39, Sheet 23, dated July 16, 1993;
received July 30, 1993.
(2) Plans; prepared by the City of Brampton - Public Works Dept.; Typical Headwall Details;
Drawing No. 332, dated 84- 01 -01, received September 15, 1993; Silt Fence and Sediment
Trap, Drawing No. 406, revised date 25 April 1988, received September 17, 1993.
(C) Favaro Holdings Inc.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12, Concession 5 EHS, (7331 Bramalea
Road), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake a sanitary sewer crossing of the East Branch of the Etobicoke Creek.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan; prepared by G.M. Sernas and Associates; Drawing P -1; dated revised June 1993.
(2) Plan; prepared by Don Naylor and Associates Ltd.; Drawing L -1; dated received
September 13, 1993.
(D) Otto and Renate Fasthuber
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 6 and 7, Concession 4 WYS, (2626 King
Road), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to place fill to allow for the expansion of a septic tile field in a regulated area of the
Humber River (East Branch).
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) As- Constructed Grades, Modified Filter Bed Plan; prepared by Rural Development
Consultants Limited; Project 93 -783; Figure 1; dated revised September 21, 1993,.
(2) Survey; prepared by R.A. Garden Limited; File No. 93 -3720, dated May 4, 1993.
(3) Cross- Section Plan; prepared by Rural Development Consultant Limited; Project P93 -783,
dated September 23, 1993.
B209 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93 .
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(E) City of Vaughan
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 25, 26, Concession 6, (Teston Road), in
the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill and to construct new concrete headwalls to stabilize the Teston Road
embankment at the Robson Bridge on a tributary of Cold Creek which is a tributary of the Humber
River (East Branch).
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Robson Bridge Slope Stabilization Plans; prepared by Totten Sims Hubicki Ltd.; Project No.
42- 18401; Drawing Nos. 1 and 2, dated August, 1993.
(F) The City of Vaughan - Community Services Department
To construct in the flood plain on Part Block B, Registered Plan 5582, (Binder Twine Park),
in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a play structure in the flood plain of the Humber River (East Branch).
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan; prepared by City of Vaughan; Parks Planning and Development Department; Drawing
L1, Revision 2, dated September 15, 1993.
(2) Plan and Section of MS10 Coaster; prepared by Kompan Ltd.; dated received
September 21, 1993.
(G) The City of Vaughan - Engineering Department
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 15 & 16, Concession 7, (Rutherford Road
between Pine Valley Drive and Islington Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Vaughan and MTRCA.
The purpose is to place fill within a regulated area to repair rill erosion and sloughing of
embankments along the Humber River valley wall.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Rutherford Road Reconstruction Plan; prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd.; Project
No. 16- 86072, Drawing No. SK1 Revision 2, dated September 15, 1993, received
September 16, 1993.
(2) Rutherford Road Rectification of Bank Sloughing Plan; prepared by Marshall Macklin
Monaghan Ltd.; Project No. 16- 89090; Drawing No. 1, Revision 2, dated April, 1993;
received August 12, 1993.
(3) Typical Drain Plans; prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd.; Job. 16- 89090; Figures
SD -1, SD -2 and SD -3, dated June 3, 1992; received September 9, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B210
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(G) The City of Vaughan - Engineering Department (contd.)
(4) Silt Fence Barrier Plan; prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd.; Drawing SK -2, dated
April 22, 1993; received September 9, 1993.
(5) Temporary Rock Flow Check Plan; prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd.; Drawing
SK -3; dated April 22, 1993; received September 9, 1993.
(H) The City of Vaughan - Community Services Department
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 14, Concession 3, (Tudor Park), in the City
of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake regrading work in a regulated area of the Don River (West Branch) to
construct a new baseball field within Tudor Park.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by The City of Vaughan - Parks, Planning and Development Division;
Job. No. T93 -43; Drawing L -1 dated September, 1993.
(2) Restoration Planting Plan Detail; prepared by the City of Vaughan - Parks, Planning and
Development Division; Job. No. T93 -43; Drawing D -4 dated September, 1993.
(I) City of Vaughan - Engineering Department
To place fill within a regulated area and construct in the flood plain on Part Lot 10,
Concession 7, (Pine Grove Road - Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to reconstruct a pedestrian /bicycle bridge crossing the Humber River and to place fill
(regrade) to relocate the entrance driveway of an existing sanitary sewage pumping station within
the Fill Regulated Area and flood plain of the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Barker Terp Gibson Limited; Drawing No.s 1, 2, & 3 dated August 19,
1993; received on August 24, 1993.
B211 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(J) The Donalda Club
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 8, Concession 3 WYS, (19 Bushbury Drive), in the City
of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a pedestrian /vehicular bridge over the Don River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Donalda Golf Course - Pedestrian and Maintenance Vehicle Access Bridge Plan; prepared by
Balke Engineering Inc.; Drawing No. ST-1 dated August 3, 1993.
(2) Proposed Plantings and Bridge Location Plan; prepared by Thomas McBroom Associates;
Drawing L1; dated revised September 17, 1993.
(K) Robert Fitzhenry
To place fill within a regulated area, and to construct in the flood plain on Part Lot 9,
Concession 1 EYS, (83 Plymbridge Road), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed
as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill within a regulated area for the proposed planting beds and to construct
a security fence within the Regional Storm flood plain to enclose the pool area of the backyard.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Landscape Plan and Pool Regulation Fence Detail; prepared by Janet Rosenberg and
Associates Inc.; dated July 20, 1993, revised August 24, 1993; received
August 26, 1993.
(L) Roger and Lorraine Keav
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 57, Registered Plan 6311, (27 Denver Crescent),
in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake regrading works to construct an inground swimming pool.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) 27 Denver Drive - Cross - Sections; prepared by Betz Pools Ltd. - Hewitt Consulting
Engineers; Drawing 1 of 1; dated September, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B212
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(M) Metropolitan Toronto - Parks & Property Department
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12, Concession 1 WYS, (4200 Yonge
Street), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to place fill within a regulated area in order to repair an eroding gully along the Don
River valley wall, downslope from the Don Valley Golf Course Clubhouse, and to construct an
improved drainage system.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Erosion Restoration Detail Plan; prepared by Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Dept.
Drawing No. B; dated August, 1993; received August 30, 1993.
(2) Erosion Restoration Cross - Section Plan; prepared by Metropolitan Toronto Parks and
Property Dept.; Drawing No. C.; dated August, 1993; received August 30, 1993.
(N) The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto - Transportation Department
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in the flood plain on Part Lot 1,
Kingsmill Reserve, Part Lot 40, Concession 1, (Sir Casimir Growski Park) in the City of
Toronto /City of Etobicoke; Humber River Watershed /Lake Ontario Waterfront as located on
property owned by the City of Etobicoke and the Ministry of Natural Resources.
The purpose is to construct a pedestrian bridge over the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Metropolitan Toronto Transportation Department - Delcan
Engineers; Contract T- 31 -93; Drawing Numbers S -740 -1 to S- 740 -15 incl.; SSC -610 -1
to SSC -610 -8 incl. dated September, 1993.
(0) Borough of East York - Parks and Recreation Department
To construct in the flood plain at two locations along Pottery Road, in the Borough of East
York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct two directional signs within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill
Regulated Area.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Directional Signs Design Details; prepared by Neon Products Limited; received
September 9, 1993.
B213 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(P) Town of Markham
To alter a watercourse between Lots 5 & 6, Concession 10, (14th Avenue, west of 11th
Concession Road), in the Town of Markham, Petticoat Creek Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to replace the culvert at the 14th Avenue creek crossing.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) 14th Avenue, west of the 11 th Concession Culvert Repair; prepared by Town of Markham,
Roads Department; received September 24, 1993.
(2) Ditch Restoration Detail, 14th Avenue, west of 11th Concession; prepared by Town of
Markham, Roads Department; received September 24, 1993.
(Q) Toronto Dominion Bank
To place fill within a regulated area, and construct• in the flood plain on Part Lot 21,
Concession 2, (740 Progress Avenue), in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to fill in the flood plain and to regrade in order to expand an existing parking lot.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Parking Lot Plan and Grading Plan; prepared by Norr Partnership Limited; Drawing Nos.
93033 Al, 93033 A2, and 85037 A03; received September 10, 1993.
(2) Parking Lot Sediment Control Details; prepared by Norr Partnership Limited; Drawing No.
93033 ADD A3 -1; received September 14, 1993.
(R) Basepoint Estates Inc.
To place fill within a regulated area and construct in the flood plain on Lot 105, Registered
Plan 240, (238 Lakeland Avenue), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed
as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a new house and place fill for lot drainage.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Lot 105, Registered Plan 240, Town of Richmond Hill, Redline Revision Site Plan; prepared
by Associated Design Company Ltd.; Project #9305; received September 24, 1993.
(2) Lot 105, Registered Plan 240, Town of Richmond Hill, Elevations, Front Elevation, Ground
Floor, Second Floor, Basement Floor; prepared by Associated Design Company Ltd.; Project
#9305; received September 24, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B214
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(S) Orlando Corporation
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 14, Concession 1 WHS, (NW corner of Highway #10
and Sandalwood Parkway), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located
on property owned by same.
The purpose is to alter the channel of a tributary of the Etobicoke Creek to install a stormwater
outfall.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan /Grading Plan; prepared by Orlando Corporation; Project No. 858; Sheet No. 1 A
dated August, 1993; received on September 24, 1993.
(2) Mechanical Site Plan; prepared by Hubbert-Novus Engineering Inc.; Project No. 93 -155;
Sheet No. M -1, dated August, 1993; received on September 24, 1993.
(T) Trans - Northern Pipelines Inc.
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on Part Lot 8, Concession 2
NDS, (Ontario Hydro R -O -W, east of Tomken Road and south of Eglinton Avenue), in the
City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill within a regulated area and to alter a waterway for the lowering of an
existing oil pipeline crossing the channel of the Little Etobicoke Creek.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Letter dated August 26, 1993 from Cumming Cockburn Ltd. regarding Vegetation
Preservation - Proposed Little Etobicoke Creek Erosion Control Work.
(2) Plan entitled- Proposed Lowering of 273.1 mm DIA. T.N.P.L.; prepared by H. Piller
Corporation Ltd.; Ref. #91 -12- 3645 -00; Drawing #C4 -2421; received on July 15, 1993.
(3) Plan entitled - Summary of Proposed Little Etobicoke Creek Pipeline Maintenance Work;
prepared by Fenco MacLaren Inc.; received on October 6, 1993.
(4) Typical Stream /Ditch Flume; prepared by Trans - Northern Pipelines Inc.; Drawing No. SK-
1912, dated July 30, 1986; received on October 6, 1993.
(5) Silt Fence Detail; prepared by Trans - Northern Pipelines Inc.; Drawing No. SK -1941, dated
November 5, 1987; received on October 6, 1993.
(U) James & Susan Smith
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 10, Concession 11, (west side of the 11th
Concession Road, approximately 2 km north of King Road), in the Township of King,
Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill within registered fill lines to install a private sewage disposal system.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by New -Land Greenscapes Inc.; received on October 1, 1993.
B215 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(V) Citv of Etobicoke - Works Department
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 6, Registered Plan 1592, (Fifth Street at
Lake Ontario), in the City of Etobicoke, Lake Ontario Waterfront as located on property
owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to reconstruct an existing outfall.
In accordance with the following documents and plans whic+ form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan, Fifth Street from Emerald Crescent to Lake Ontario; prepared by City of
Etobicoke, Works Department: Drawing No. PDB -1913; Sheet 7, revision 1 dated
September 24, 1993.
(W) Town of Markham
To alter a watercourse between Lots 25 and 26, Concession 6, (18th Avenue east of
Kennedy Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to replace an existing culvert at the 18th Avenue river crossing.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) 18th Avenue West of McCowan Road Bridge Repair; prepared by Town of Markham -
Roads Department; Drawing #2 of 2; received October 5, 1993.
(X) Cedar Brae Golf Club
To place fill within a regulated area, on Part Lots 12 & 13; Concession 5; Lot 12,
Concession 4, (Steeles Avenue at Staines Road), in the City of Scarborough, Rouge River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to make minor improvements to the 4th, 14th, and 18th holes within the existing
golf course.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) 4th Green, Cedar Brae Golf and Country Club Riparian Plantings; prepared by Robinson &
Carrick Associates Ltd.; received September 24, 1993.
(2) 18th Hole, Cedar Brae Golf and Country Club; Riparian Planting; prepared by Robinson &
Carrick Associates Ltd.; received September 24, 1993.
(3) 4th Tee, Cedar Brae Golf and Country Club; Cross - sections and Section Locations; prepared
by Robinson and Carrick Associates Ltd.; received September 16, 1993.
(4) 4th Tee, 18th Fairway, 18th Green; Cedar Brae Golf and Country Club; prepared by
Robinson and Carrick Associates Ltd.; Received September 16, 1993.
(5) 4th Green, 14th Fairway, 14th Green, Cedar Brae Golf and Country Club; prepared by
Robinson and Carrick Associates Ltd.; received September 16, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE !8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B216 •
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(Y) City of Scarborough
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 28, Concession 3, (north of Sheppard avenue, east of
Kennedy Road), in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
WITHDRAWN. Information not received.
(Z) City of Toronto - Department of Public Works and Environment
To alter a watercourse under the Bayview Extension at the Don Valley Exit Ramp, in the
City of Toronto, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Toronto.
The purpose is to remove sediment accumulated from an outfall discharge channel.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Outlet Improvement Plan; prepared by City of Toronto, Department of Public Works and
Environment; Drawing No. P -152; as received on October 27, 1992.
(2) Sediment Control Details; prepared by City of Toronto, Department of Public Works and
Environment; Drawing No. SK -1969; as received September 30, 1993.
(3) Letter of Undertaking regarding Enhancement Details; from N. Verdin of the City of
Toronto, Department of Public Works and Environment; as received September 30, 1993.
(AA) Banson Chong
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 35, Concession 2, (12080 Leslie Street), in the Town of
Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by Douglas Morley in
trust.
The purpose is to construct a driveway crossing.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Red Line Revision Site Plan and Flood Study, 12080 Leslie Street, Town of Richmond Hill;
prepared by Heartland Engineering; received October 1, 1993.
(BB) Worth Homes Ltd.
To place fill within a regulated area on Lots 68 -71, Registered Plan 1987, (May Avenue at
Kersey), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to place fill in the flood plain to facilitate the development of a seven lot draft
approved plan of subdivision.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Kersey -May Subdivision, Grading Plan and Planting Plan; prepared by Bryan Thomas &
Associates Inc., Landscape Planning Ltd.; received September 30, 1993.
B217 OCTOBER 8, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(CC) Citv of Toronto - Public Works and Environment
To place fill within a regulated area on Eastern Beaches between Glen Major Drive and
Beech Avenue, in the City of Toronto, Lake Ontario Waterfront as located on property
owned by City of Toronto, and on Crown Property.
The purpose is to install and protect a proposed detention tank by increasing the beach area and
providing added protection to the existing shoreline.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) City of Toronto, Eastern Beaches, Maclean Avenue Detention Tank; prepared by City of
Toronto - Public Works Department; Drawing No.s P1 - P10, Al - A2 and SP1 - SP2;
Contract No. 58400; as received on September 3, 1993.
(DD) Region of Durham
To alter a watercourse on Clarkes Hollow Road, in the Town of Pickering, Duffins Creek
Watershed as located on property owned by Ministry of Government Services.
The purpose is to construct a storm water outfall for road side drainage.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Drainage Outfall to West Duffin Creek at Clarkes Hollow Road; prepared by Totten Sims
Hubicki and Associates; Contract D92 -1; Drawing D -1; received September 1, 1993.
(2) Correspondence to MTRCA from Totten Sims Hubicki and Associates; dated October 4,
1993, addressing the proposed outfall.
(EE) Cougs Investments Ltd.
To construct in a flood plain on Brock Road and Finch Avenue, in the Town of Pickering,
Duffins Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a temporary sales information centre.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan Details; prepared by Cougs Investments Ltd.; Project No. 9345; Drawing No. 1 of
1; received on September 29, 1993.
(2) Foundation and Floor Plan; prepared by Cougs Investments Ltd.; Project No. 9345; Drawing
No.s 2 of 6 and 6 of 6; received September 29, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/93, OCTOBER 8, 1993 B218
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(FF) Cougs Investments Ltd.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 34, 35, Concession 7, (37 Buggey Lane),
in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to install and resurface golf cart pathways and to rehabilitate existing greens within
the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Pathway Location Plan; prepared by Cougs Investments Ltd.; received September 21,
1993.
(2) Pathway Swale Cross - section Drawing; prepared by Cougs Investments Ltd.; received on
September 21, 1993.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:08 a.m., October 8, 1993.
William B. Granger J. Craig Mather
Chair Acting Secretary- Treasurer
/bb.
c.
Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
NOVEMBER 26, 1993
minutes
8219
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #9/93
The Executive Committee met at Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitors Centre on Friday,
November 26, 1993. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at 8:40 a.m.
PRESENT:
MINUTES
Res. #E174/93
Chair William Granger
Vice Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
Richard O'Brien
Paul Palleschi
Jim Witty
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #8193 be approved.
DELEGATIONS
Richard O'Brien
Jim Witty
CARRIED
(a) Permit Application by Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department, item 16 (S) of
these minutes.
Mr. Stefan Bolliger of Stefen Bolliger Associates, representing the Don Valley Golf Course, spoke to
the Committee on this item. Mr. Hans Kwan, Manager of Planning and Research, The Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department answered questions from Committee
members.
(b) Slope Instability at the rear of 42 Royal Rouge Trail, Scarborough
Mr. Trevor D'Souza addressed the Committee regarding the slope instability at the rear of his
property at 42 Royal Rouge Trail, Scarborough. He circulated a sample of his backyard soil and
pictures of the area involved.
Mr. Ronald Pratt also addressed the Committee regarding 42 Royal Rouge Trail.
B220 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
DELEGATIONS (CONTD.)
Res. #E175/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Richard O'Brien
THAT the delegations addressing the slope instability at 42 Royal Rouge Trail, Scarborough, be
received.
CARRIED
The Chair thanked the delegations and assured them that staff would continue to cooperate in
every way possible.
(c) Potential Disposal of Surplus Authority Land
-139 Sylvan Avenue
Ms. Gwen Agboat, representing the owners of 463 Guildwood Parkway, Scarborough, expressed
satisfaction in the process taken by the Authority to dispose of the property at 139 Sylvan Avenue
and reiterated her desire to exchange property at 463 Guildwood Parkway for 139 Sylvan Avenue.
CORRESPONDENCE
Letter from Trevor D'Souza dated November 13, 1993, re: Request for Deputation
Letter from Trevor and Winifred D'Souza dated November 13, 1993, re: Slope Instability at 42
Royal Rouge Trail
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO
- Request for a permanent easement for an existing Sanitary Trunk Sewer, on the West
Humber River, between Albion Road and Islington Avenue
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto to provide a permanent
easement for an existing Sanitary Trunk Sewer, located on the West Humber River between Albion
Road and Islington Avenue.
Res. #E176/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from The Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto to provide a permanent easement for an existing sanitary trunk sewer located on the West
Humber River between Albion Road and Islington Avenue;
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B221
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO (CONTD.)
- Request for a permanent easement for an existing Sanitary Trunk Sewer, on the West
Humber River, between Albion Road and Islington Avenue
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co- operate
with The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 1.263 hectares, more or Tess, (3.122 acres) be granted to
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for an existing Sanitary Trunk Sewer, said land being Part
of Camp Street, Plan M -433, City of Etobicoke, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto has conveyed lands to the Authority over the years for
the nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that this easement be granted for the
nominal consideration of $2.00. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto has agreed to assume all
legal, survey and other costs involved in completing the transaction.
The subject lands were acquired from The Corporation of the City of Etobicoke in November, 1989,
under the Humber River Flood Plain Lands component of the Land Acquisition Project.
This sewer was constructed by the Township of Etobicoke around 1955 in the then open street
and was assumed by Metro in 1962 by By -Law No. 1728. Under normal circumstances the
easement would have been conveyed to Metro on the closed street prior to conveyance to the
Authority.
2. REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF AUTHORITY OWNED LAND - HUMBER RIVER WATERSHED
- Vicinity of Boyd Conservation Area, south side of Rutherford Road, east of Islington Ave.
KEY ISSUE
The Authority is in receipt of a request from The Corporation of the City of Vaughan, to acquire
approximately 10 acres of Authority -owned land, adjacent to the City of Vaughan holdings at the
south east corner of Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road, in order to expand the existing
Vaughan recreational uses.
B222 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF AUTHORITY OWNED LAND - HUMBER RIVER WATERSHED
(CONTD.)
- Vicinity of Boyd Conservation Area, south side of Rutherford Road, east of Islington Ave.
Res. #E177/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the request for disposal of this land, be
referred to Authority staff for review, in accordance with the established Authority policies;
AND FURTHER THAT a report recommending further action in this matter, be brought forward to
the Executive Committee at a future date.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This matter is brought to your attention in accordance with Resolution #26, adopted by the
members of Authority at Meeting #1/91, held on February 22, 1991.
3. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 - 1995
FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT
- Humber River Watershed, Maranatha Christian Reformed Church of Woodbridge
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located south of Langstaff Road, east of Islington Avenue under "Interim
Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1993 - 1995" - Flood Plain and Conservation
Component - Humber River Watershed.
Res. #E178/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 2.094 acres, more or Tess, be purchased from
Maranatha Christian Reformed Church of Woodbridge, said land being an irregular shaped parcel of
land being Part of Lot 10, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, located
south of Langstaff Road, east of Islington Avenue;
THAT the purchase price be $6,282.00, plus legal survey costs and vendor's legal costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B223
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995
FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT (CONTD.)
- Humber River Watershed, Maranatha Christian Reformed Church of Woodbridge
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A97/93, Authority Meeting #4, May 28, 1993, approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with Leslie F. Forder of Loopstra, Nixon & McLeish Barristers &
Solicitors, representing the owner.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004 -1 1 -502 - Flood Control Hazard Account.
4. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995 -
WATERFRONT COMPONENT AND LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION
PROJECT 1992 -1994 / PICKERING / AJAX SECTOR
-John B. Connell Property
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located at 2971 Lakeview Boulevard in the Pickering Beach area of the Town
of Ajax under Interim Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1993 -1995 - Waterfront
Component and Lake Ontario Waterfront Regeneration Project 1992 -1994 / Pickering /Ajax Sector.
Res. #E179/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT, on the basis of the Town of Ajax providing to
the Authority an amount of $ 100,000. towards the purchase price, 0.27 acres, more or less, be
purchased from John B. Connell, said land being an irregular shaped parcel of land consisting of all
of Lot 26 and Part of Lakecrest Drive, Plan 380, Town of Ajax, Regional Municipality of Durham;
B224 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995 -
WATERFRONT COMPONENT AND LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION
PROJECT 1992 -1994 / PICKERING /AJAX SECTOR (CONTD.)
-John B. Connell Property
THAT the purchase price be the sum of $200,000., plus vendor's legal costs on the basis of the
sum of $100,000. being payable on the closing date of December 15, 1993 and the balance of
$100,000. being payable on or before March 31, 1994;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A97/93, Authority Meeting #4/93, May 28, 1993 and Resolution #100, Authority
Meeting #3/91, May 3, 1991, approving the projects.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner and his solicitor Steven P. Parish of Parish and
Bloodworth Barristers, Solicitors, Notaries, 36 Harwood Avenue, South, Ajax.
Situate on the property is a one storey, 2 bedroom frame dwelling, together with a frame detached
garage.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of this property.
RATIONALE
This property is located on the shoreline of Lake Ontario in the Pickering Beach area, within the
Authority's approved Master Plan of Acquisition. The Authority owns substantial lands both east
and west of the subject property. This acquisition is a key purchase in linking up existing parcels
so that the lands can be made available to the public.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004 -12 -502 - Waterfront Openspace Account and it is
proposed the funding be obtained from land sale revenue, together with a contribution of
$100,000. from the Town of Ajax. The lands will be managed by the Town of Ajax upon
completion of the purchase.
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B225
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995 FLOOD
PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT
-Don River Watershed, Trusting Renovation Ltd. Property
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located at 72 Pemberton Road under the "Interim Greenspace Protection and
Acquisition Project 1993 -1995" - Flood Plain and Conservation Component - Don River Watershed.
Res. #E180/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.145 acres, more or Tess, be acquired from
Trusting Renovation Ltd., said land being Part of Lot 64, Registered Plan 2027, designated as
Part 2 on Plan 65R- 14343, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York;
THAT the purchase price be $25,000.;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A97/93, Authority Meeting #4/93, May 28, 1993, approving the project.
The subject property is a rectangular parcel fronting on the north side of Pemberton Road which
was severed from a larger holding.
This parcel was earlier subject to litigation launched by Greenvale Design /Build Inc. involving the
Authority, the Town of Richmond Hill and others, which was resolved in February, 1992.
The subject property was acquired by the current owner at a purchase price of $139,000.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner and his solicitor, Mr. Gregory Roberts, and
subject to the approval of your Committee, an agreement has now been reached with respect to
acquisition.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
B226 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995 FLOOD
PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT (CONTD.)
-Don River Watershed, Trusting Renovation Ltd. Property
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved Master Plan for Acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The funding of this purchase will be charged to Account 004-11-502.
6. SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS
- Fairport Beach Area, Town of Pickering
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of Offers to Purchase, concerning the potential disposal of surplus Authority lands situate
in the Fairport Beach Area, Town of Pickering, in the Regional Municipality of Durham.
Res. #E181/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of an
offer from N. Bigioni Management Services Limited, to purchase surplus Authority owned lands in
the Fairport Beach area of the Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to complete
a sale to N. Bigioni Management Services Limited in this instance;
THAT six parcels of land situate in the Fairport Beach area of the Town of Pickering, in the
Regional Municipality of Durham, as described below, be sold to N. Bigioni Management Services
Limited:
Parcel 1 - Lot 13, Plan 270, having a frontage of 60 ft., more or less, on the east side of
Marksbury Avenue by a depth of 159.84 ft., more or less, consisting of approximately 9,590 sq.
ft.;
Parcel 2 - Lot 14, and Part of Lot 15, Plan 270, having a frontage of 80 ft., more or less, on the
east side of Marksbury Avenue by a depth of 159.84 ft., more or less, consisting of approximately
12,787 sq. ft., more or less, subject to easements as set out in Instrument Nos. D158162,
D51645 and 240690;
Parcel 3 - Lot 29, Plan 270, having a frontage of 59.61 ft., more or less, on the west side of
Marksbury Avenue by a depth of 160.04 ft., more or less, consisting of approximately 9,540 sq.
ft.;
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 8227
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS (CONTD.)
- Fairport Beach Area, Town of Pickering
Parcel 4 - Lot 30, Plan 270, having a frontage of 59.05 ft., more or less, on the west side of
Marksbury Avenue by a depth of 160.04 ft., more or less, consisting of approximately 9,450 sq.
ft., subject to a sewer easement over Part 3 on Plan 40R -5394;
Parcel 5 - Lot 38,. Plan 270, having a frontage of 65 ft., more or less, on the east side of Park
Crescent by a depth of 170 ft., more or less, consisting of approximately 11,563 sq. ft.;
Parcel 6 - Part of Lot 19, Plan 364, having a frontage of 220 ft., more or less, on the north side of
Park Crescent by an irregular depth consisting of approximately 28,463 sq. ft.;
THAT the Authority request the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources to complete the sale
of the subject lands on the following terms and conditions:
(a) The sale price is to be the sum of $800,000.;
(b) The lands are to be used for single family residential purposes only. A maximum of
three single family residential homes are to be allowed on Parcel 6;
(c) Completion of this sale will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be
required;
(d) The transaction is to be completed at the earliest possible date with payment in full
to the Authority in cash on closing;
(e) The purchaser acknowledges that the Authority retains lands in the vicinity that will
be used for the purpose of constructing and as part of a Waterfront Park and the
purchaser agrees not to object to such uses or to the Authority's plans for
development of a Waterfront Park and is to provide such assurances that may be
required by the Authority, that the purchaser or its successors in title will not object
to any such uses;
(f) Any additional conditions as deemed appropriate by the Authority solicitor;
THAT the sale be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance to Section 21 (c) of the
Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority meeting #1 /92, held on February 21, 1992, certain parcels of Authority owned land
situate beyond the current boundaries of the Authority's Lake Ontario Waterfront requirements
were declared surplus as to the requirements of the Authority. This decision was made after
extensive public consultation, in accordance with Authority policy for land disposal.
B228 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS (CONTD.)
- Fairport Beach Area, Town of Pickering
In accordance with the comments received during the public consultation process, staff were
directed: "That preference be given wherever possible to sales or exchanges being made at market
value to the following:
(a) remaining private owners situate within the acquisition boundary;
(b) abutting property owners;
(c) former owners of the subject lands ".
All of the above were advised in early 1992 of the aforementioned. A satisfactory offer from one
of the abutting owners was received and a sale of that parcel was successfully completed earlier in
1993, at an amount of $75,000. A second abutting owner who had earlier indicated an interest in
purchasing an adjacent parcel subsequently withdrew her request.
The availability of the remaining surplus Authority owned lands at this location was advertised
publicly for sale during late 1992, with no satisfactory offers being received.
Upon reviewing the offers received, it was brought to the attention of Authority staff that certain
lots on registered plans had merged.
During late 1992 and 1993, extensive discussions were held with officials of the Town of Pickering
regarding providing assistance to the Authority to alleviate Planning Act problems resulting from
lands merging under the Planning Act even though they were separate Tots on a registered plan.
The parcels while purchased as separate holdings from individual owners merged on title after
acquisition by the Authority because of portions of the registered plans being deregistered by the
Municipality.
On July 27, 1993, the Town registered a copy of By -Law 4242/93 which reinstated the status of
the subject Tots. A condition of the Town approval was that an amount of $10,307.50 be payable
to the Town as a parkland contribution.
In accordance with the earlier direction of the members of the Authority, all parties who earlier
expressed an interest in the purchase of the subject lands during the public tender process were
again advised of the availability of the lands and invited to submit sealed offers to the attention of
the Chief Administrative Officer of the Authority before 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 7, 1993.
The proposals received on October 7, 1993, were opened publicly at Tender Opening Sub -
Committee #8/93 (Appendix TO.17/93), held October 8, 1993.
The offer by N. Bigioni Management Services Limited of $834,000. was on the basis that any
outstanding levies would be payable by the Authority.
Upon reviewing the potential of additional levies, it has been determined that additional standard
development charges in the amounts of $4,900. per parcel by the Town of Pickering and $7,300.
per parcel by The Regional Municipality of Durham may be routinely levied for a total of an
additional $73,200.
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B229
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. SALE OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS (CONTD.)
- Fairport Beach Area, Town of Pickering
In discussions with representatives of N. Bigioni Management Services Limited, it has now been
agreed that the purchaser will assume full responsibility for payment of all existing, as well as
potential lot levies, and pay the Authority a lump sum of 5800,000. on closing.
A current independent appraisal of the surplus Authority owned land indicate that the lump sum
payment of $800,000. is above the estimated current market value of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject lands have been declared surplus by the Authority. Disposition of these surplus lands
is of financial benefit to the Authority to allow its resources to be utilized for the acquisition,
protection and use of lands required for Authority purposes.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the proceeds from this sale be used in the funding of the purchase of priority
properties within the Authority's Acquisition Project.
7. TORONTO ISLANDS
- Repairs to Ward's Island Inner Harbour Retaining Wall
KEY ISSUE
The Tender Opening Sub - Committee #9/93 (Appendix TO.19/93) opened tenders for the Ward's
Island Inner Harbour Wall "C" shoreline protection and recommended that all tenders be referred to
staff for review and report.
Res. #E182/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the tender for Contract ED93 -20 be awarded
to Canadian Dredge and Dock Inc., at a total cost of $256,439.41, including GST.
CARRIED
RATIONALE
The tenders received were for the placement, by marine based equipment, of an estimated 5,400
tonnes of rip rap stone for shoreline protection and an estimated 450 tonnes of various size stone
for fish habitat.
Staff has reviewed the tenders in consultation with W. F. Baird and Associates and has determined
that all tenders were properly completed.
B230 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
7. TORONTO ISLANDS (CONTD.)
- Repairs to Ward's Island Inner Harbour Retaining Wall
The low bidder, Canadian Dredge and Dock, has satisfactorily completed work for the Authority in
the past. Their most recent project was the maintenance dredging of Coatsworth Cut, Ashbridges
Bay in 1992. Staff is satisfied that the low bidder has the necessary equipment and experienced
staff to properly complete the work in accordance to the plans and specifications.
Staff recommends that Contract ED93 -20 be awarded to the low bidder, Canadian Dredge and
Dock Inc., for the tendered price of $256,439.41.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding at 100% is provided under jobs0ntario Capital through the Ministry of Natural Resources
under Account No. 151 -03.
8. REVISED MEETING SCHEDULE 1994 -95
KEY ISSUE
A request for a change to the Finance and Administration Advisory Board meeting schedule plus a
change to the November, 1994 meeting dates.
Res. #E183/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Schedule of Meetings 1994 -95 as revised,
dated November 1, 1993, be approved;
AND FURTHER THAT the Secretary- Treasurer distribute this revised schedule at the earliest
opportunity to all agencies who appoint members to The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
To accommodate member municipalities' observance of Remembrance Day, and at the request of
member Eldred King, who has previous commitments on the second Friday of the month which
would affect his attendance at Finance and Administration Advisory Board meetings, the following
meeting dates are proposed for the months of May 1994, November 1994 and January 1995.
MAY 1994:
May 6, 1994
May 6, 1994
May 13, 1994
May 27, 1994
Finance and Administration Advisory Board #2/94
Executive Committee Meeting #3/94
Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board #3/94
Authority #4/94 (as originally scheduled)
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B231
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
8. REVISED MEETING SCHEDULE 1994 -95 (CONTD.)
NOVEMBER 1994:
November 4, 1994
November 4, 1994
November 18, 1994
November 18, 1994
November 25, 1994
JANUARY 1995:
January 6, 1995
January 6, 1995
January 13, 1995
January 20, 1995
January 27, 1995
Finance and Administration Advisory Board #5/94
Executive Committee #9/94
Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board #7/94
Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board #4/94 (as
originally scheduled)
Authority #10/94 (as originally scheduled)
Finance and Administration Advisory Board #6/94
Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board #5/94 (as
originally scheduled)
Executive Committee #11/94 (as originally scheduled)
Water and Related Land Management Advisory Board (as originally
scheduled)
Authority #12/94 (as originally scheduled)
Previously scheduled meeting dates, as stated in Authority Resolution #A171/93, remain
unchanged.
9. 1993 FINANCIAL PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1
This item was recommended for approval at Finance and Administration Advisory Board Meeting
#4/93, held October 22, 1993.
KEY ISSUE
This is the first Financial Progress Report submitted for 1993 covering the period of January 1,
1993 to October 3, 1993.
Res. #E184/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT the 1993 Financial Progress Report No. 1, dated October 3, 1993 (Appendix FA.193/93), be
received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Finance and Administration Advisory Board on the
measures being taken to address the falling revenues of Black Creek Pioneer Village.
CARRIED
B232 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9193, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS FROM JUNE TO SEPTEMBER, 1993
This item was recommended for approval at Finance and Administration Advisory Board Meeting
#4/93, held October 22, 1993.
KEY ISSUE
Request for approval of the accounts from June to September, 1993.
Res. #E185/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT expenditures for the months of June to September, 1993, in the amount of $ 17,951,708.
be approved.
CARRIED
11. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND
-139 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough
KEY ISSUE
Staff report on the status of the public process concerning the potential disposal of surplus
Authority -owned land at 139 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough. Members of the public have
been invited to attend before the members of the Executive Committee in person to make
submissions or comments.
Res. #E186/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
THAT the staff report regarding 139 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough dated November 12,
1993, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to review all public submissions and comments received and
provide a further report to the Executive Committee with a suggested course of action for the
potential disposition of the subject land.
AMENDMENT
Res. #E187/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
THAT the staff report on the disposal of 139 Sylvan Avenue include the option of a land exchange
with 463 Guildwood Parkway.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B233
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND (CONTD.)
-139 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough
BACKGROUND
At a meeting held on July 9, 1993, the members of the Executive Committee adopted
Res. #E105/93:
"THAT the staff report dated 1993.06.29. concerning a request for exchange of
lands in the Scarborough Sector of the Lake Ontario Waterfront be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to continue with the public process for the
potential disposal of lands at this location, in accordance with Authority policy and
report further to the Executive Committee concerning this matter at a future date."
The Authority in this instance received a request from Gwen Agboat to exchange 463 Guildwood
Parkway for Authority land at 139 Sylvan Avenue.
In respect to the proposed exchange the following action was taken:
(a) The proposed exchange has been reviewed with officials of the City of Scarborough
and the City has no objection to the exchange;
(b) A public meeting concerning Shoreline Protection Works in the Sylvan Avenue area
of the City of Scarborough, was held on June 2, 1993. At the meeting which was
held at 166 Sylvan Avenue, owners to the immediate east of 139 Sylvan Avenue
expressed a concern with the potential of the residence currently on the property
being relocated and a portion of the property being returned to private ownership;
(c) Authority technical staff have reviewed the Authority holding at 139 Sylvan Avenue
and feel that there is a sufficient portion of the property that can be disposed of to
create a residential lot with the slope land and a sufficient buffer .still being retained
in Authority ownership.
In view of the interest expressed by residents in the area, it was felt that additional public input
should be sought through the public land disposal process prior to a recommendation for disposal
being made.
The land proposed to be declared surplus is not required for Authority purposes.
In accordance with Authority policy the following action has been taken to date with respect to the
proposed disposal:
(a) A sign was installed in July of 1993 on the subject property inviting public
comment;
(b) Notices of public information sessions were sent to the following:
- City of Scarborough
8234 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND (CONTD.)
-139 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough
- The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
- Members of the public who have called for information
- Local and Metropolitan Toronto Councillors
- Waterfront Regeneration Trust
(c) Notice of Public Information Session and request for public comment was placed in
The Scarborough Mirror on October 3, 1993;
(d) A Public Information Session was held on October 6, 1993, at 166 Sylvan Avenue
between the hours of 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.;
(e) Members of the public have been invited to attend before the Executive Committee
on November 26, 1993, in person and make submissions or comments.
Authority staff including representatives from the Property and Administration Section, and Water
Resources Division were on hand throughout the information session.
Staff prepared a public information package for distribution. This package was available during the
Public Information Session and was mailed out to parties who had expressed an interest in the
property.
Copies of information received at the Public Information Session and additional correspondence was
distributed with the Executive Agenda.
It should be noted that staff have received a number of verbal comments through telephone calls
and from visitors at the Public Information Session. While no members of the public objected to
the potential disposition of this land, a few of the people suggested that funds generated from the
sale be utilized for shoreline work at this location.
In addition to the comments circulated, many parties expressed an interest in the potential
purchase of the parcel and enquiries have been received as to the process for the purchase of the
lot.
It is proposed that the disposal of the land be at market value. It is further proposed that the
availability of the land be publicly advertised.
RATIONALE
Staff feel that it is essential that in the management of the Authority's resources that every effort
possible be made to assist in reducing the funding requirements from the taxpayers, and
accordingly, the disposal of this land, if suitable arrangements can be made, is in the best interest
of the Authority and the public.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the funds generated from the sale of this surplus land be utilized to acquire
additional high priority properties within approved Authority projects within the Authority's area of
jurisdiction.
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B235
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
12. HINDER EXPROPRIATION LEGAL FEES
KEY ISSUE
Settlement of legal fees from expropriation of Hinder property in the Don River Watershed.
Res. #E188/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Paul Palleschi
Peter Oyler
THAT the decision of the Assessment Officer dated October 4, 1993, in the matter of legal fees
and expenses relating to the Hinder Expropriation be accepted by the Authority;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to take the necessary action to settle the outstanding
payments as a result of the decision of the Assessment Officer.
13. ANNUAL DINNER AND CHILDREN'S HOLIDAY PARTY
- Authority Staff and Members
KEY ISSUE
The following arrangements have been made for the above -noted events.
Res. #E189/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
CARRIED
THAT the Chief Administrative Officer be authorized and directed to make such arrangements as
may be necessary for the members and staff Annual Dinner, Friday, December 10th, 1993,
commencing at 6:00 p.m. at the Visitors Centre, Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Children's
Holiday Party, Saturday, December 4th, 1993, Kortright Centre for Conservation, 3:00 p.m. to
5:00 p.m.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Each year the Authority has supported holiday events as noted above. Last year for the first time
the staff and members dinners were combined in a single event. In 1993, no subsidy is being
provided to this event. The Children's Holiday Party has a budget of $3,000 and funds have been
provided in the approved 1993 Authority Budget.
B236 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. STATUS REPORT
- Permit Application Res. #E71/93, City of Mississauga Transportation & Works Department
City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed
KEY ISSUE
A status report for Ontario Regulation 158 permit application Res. #E71 /93 has been prepared as
directed by the Executive Committee at Meeting #3/93, May 07, 1993.
Res. #E190/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT the status report for Ontario Regulation 158 permit application E71/93 by the City of
Mississauga Transportation & Works Department be received for information regarding the progress
of the approved works.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Application #E71/93/MISS was approved by Executive Committee Meeting #3/93, May 07, 1993,
by Res. #E71/93, quoted as follows:
"THAT the permit application from the City of Mississauga, Transportation & Works
Department, Agenda Item 13(s), to place fill within a regulated area, construct within a
flood plain and alter a waterway, on Part Lot 2, Concessions 4 and 5, (Matheson Boulevard
extension - Creekbank Road to Explorer Drive), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek
Watershed be approved in accordance with the following documents and plans which form
part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Delcan Corporation; Project No. 92109, Sheet G3, Plan No. C-
28886, dated March, 1992, revised and received May 4, 1993; Sheet G 1, Plan No.
C- 28884; Sheet G2, Plan No. C- 28885; revised and received May 4, 1993; Sheet
S1, Plan No. C- 28887; Sheet S2, Plan No. C- 28888; Sheet S3, P /an No. C- 28889;
Sheet S4, Plan No. C- 28890; Sheet S5, P /an No. C- 28891; Sheet S6, Plan No. C-
28892; Sheet S7, Plan No. C- 28893; Sheet S8, Plan No. C- 28894; Sheet S18, Plan
No. C -28904 dated October, 1992; Sheet 6, P /an No. C- 28874, dated March,
1993, revised and received April 5, 1993.
(2) Landscape Plan; prepared by Delcan Corporation; Project No. 012416; Plan No.
L001/92; revised April 30, 1993 and received May 4, 1993.
AMENDMENT Res. #E72/93
THAT staff report back to Executive Committee Meeting #9/93, November 12, 1993,
regarding the progress of the approved works.
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 BZ37
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. STATUS REPORT (CONTD.)
- Permit Application Res. #E71/93, City of Mississauga Transportation & Works Department
City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed
STATUS
Permit issued May 12, 1993.
The Matheson Boulevard Extension Project started May 13, 1993. At the time of the first site
inspection on May 13, 1993, top soil separation was underway. Delcan Engineering, through the
City of Mississauga, was required to submit a permit revision allowing for top soil to be stored
within the flood plain as well as onto City of Mississauga Valley Land. Silt /sediment controls were
in place and being maintained.
Over the course of the summer, up until the latest site inspection, October 21, 1993, construction
on the bridge was in compliance with approved plans. The Coffer Dam and subsequent temporary
channelization were installed as per the approved submission. Delcan Engineering staff, as
requested by our Enforcement Department, contacted our staff prior to start up. Installation went
very well. There was no silt loading into the Etobicoke Creek. Furthermore, the system had been
inundated with water on two occasions, due to heavy rain fall, resulting with no apparent damage
to the Coffer Dams. It should also be noted that the method using the wetland filter bags was also
applied with positive results. Wetland filter bags are a new method of pumping water from the
excavation around the bridge supports to the watercourse using filter bags to collect silt.
A total of eight inspections have been conducted to date. Both the contractors, BOT Construction
and Delcan Engineering, have been very cooperative and diligent with respect to controlling on -site
siltation, as well as maintaining the sediment controls already in place around the perimeter of the
site. As noted on a number of inspections, work crews would find vandalism and /or complete
removal of silt control sections as motorcycles and /or ATV traffic occurred on off hours.
As of October 21, 1993, the demolition of the bridge framing was underway. The site is being
prepared for winter conditions and will continue to be inspected by our Enforcement staff.
15. CLAREMONT CONSERVATION FIELD CENTRE
- Tender for Replacement of the Roof, FOD 93 -35
KEY ISSUE
Tender Opening Sub - Committee, Report #10/93, Appendix TO.21/93, opened tenders for the
replacement of the Claremont Conservation Field Centre roof and recommended that all tenders be
referred to staff for review and report.
8238 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. CLAREMONT CONSERVATION FIELD CENTRE (CONTD.)
- Tender for Replacement of the Roof, FOD 93 -35
Res. #E191/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT Tender FOD 93 -35 for the Claremont Conservation Field Centre roof replacement be awarded
to B.W. Doucette at a total cost of $32,314. including PST and GST, plus additional insulation if
required at $24.00 per sheet, this being the lowest overall quotation received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The roof on the Claremont Conservation Field Centre is 24 years old and is in poor state of repair.
Tenders were invited to replace the existing shingles over the original rolled roof with a new roof
utilizing a membrane system. Six companies were invited to tender and five responses were
received. The tender price for completion of the job includes replacement of 480 sq. ft. of
insulation. Firms were also requested to provide a price per sheet of additional insulation that may
be required to be replaced as determined by staff when the roof is removed.
RATIONALE
Staff has reviewed the tenders received (T0.21/93) and has determined that all tenders were
properly completed. Staff investigation of the variance in the extra insulation costs indicate the
two low prices did not reflect costs of removal and disposal of old material as called for in
specifications. The low bidder, B.W. Doucette, has satisfactorily completed work for the Authority
in the past, including replacement of the Albion Hills Beach Centre roof. Staff is satisfied that the
low bidder is capable of satisfactorily completing the work required within the time specified.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding is available in the maintenance reserve.
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
KEY ISSUE
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such
area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B239
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
A permit may be approved or refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority,
the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Res. #E192/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Jim Witty
THAT permit applications for the Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department, listed as
agenda item 14 (S), for permission to place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 11, 12, 13,
Concession 1 WYS, (Don Valley Golf Course), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed, as
located on property owned by same, be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the
period of November 26, 1993 to November 25, 1995, in accordance with the information
contained within the report and in accordance with the following documents and plans that form
part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Stefan Bolliger Associates; Metro Parks and Property Contract No. P-
383-93; Drawings L -A -1 - L -A -3; L -B -1 - L -B -5; L -C -1 - L -C -6; L -D -1 - L -D -4; 1 -A -1, 1 -A -2;
received October 25, 1993.
Res. #E193/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
CARRIED
THAT permit applications listed herein as (A) to (BB) inclusive, with the exception of (S), be
granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the period of November 26, 1993 to
November 25, 1995 in accordance with the information contained within the reports.
CARRIED
(A) City of Brampton
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 1, Concession 1 WHS, (Peel Village Parkway &
Highway 10), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property
owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to construct a gazebo.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Gazebo Location & Plant List Plan, Kiwanis Memorial Park; File No. C01 E01.00L; submitted
by City of Brampton; dated November 16, 1993; received November 17, 1993;
(2) Gazebo /Arbour Shelter, Kiwanis Memorial Park; prepared by Basector General Contractors;
dated July 1993; received September 9, 1993.
B240 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(B) Vlado Zupanec
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 11, Registered Plan 1002, (3 St. John's Road),
in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material within registered fill lines in order to repair on -going erosion on
the rear yard slope.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site and Cross - Section Plan; prepared by Sebastion Zupanec; received on October 8, 1993.
(C) Italian Construction
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 53,
Registered Plan 43M -276, (7481 Tranmere Drive), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke
Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake regrading works and to construct a retaining wall in a regulated area of
the Etobicoke Creek.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Grading and Servicing Plan; prepared by R.E. Winter & Associates Ltd.; Drawing SG -1;
received July 20, 1989.
(D) Metropolitan Toronto Works Department
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 11 - 15, Registered Plan 598, in the City of
Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to undertake erosion protection works to an existing manhole on the Etobicoke
Creek Sanitary Trunk Sewer.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Etobicoke Creek Sanitary Trunk Sewer - Man Hole #24, Erosion Protection Plan; prepared
by Metro Toronto Works Department - WPC System and Services; Project 93 -665; dated
March, 1993;
(2) Etobicoke Creek Sanitary Trunk Sewer - Man Hole #24, Erosion Control at Maintenance
Hole #24; prepared by Metro Toronto Works Department - WPC System and Services;
Project 92 -665; dated October, 1993.
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B241
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(E) B•. Bhoola
To place fill within a regulated area and construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 1, Concession
7, (5000 King- Vaughan Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located
on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 1.82 metre wide by 6.10 metre long pedestrian bridge over the East
Humber River and place a maximum of 0.20 metres of fill within the fill regulated area to
accommodate the approach ramps on either side of the bridge.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by B. Bhoola; received June 17, 1993;
(2) Cross - section Plan; prepared by B. Bhoola, dated October 5, 1993; received October 6,
1993.
(F) Venerando and Felicia DeFina
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 4, Registered Plan 4005, (54 Broda Drive), in the City
of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 2.4 metre x 6.2 metre addition to an existing storage building, within
the Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Albert P. Tonon (agent); received on September 15, 1993.
(G) Kent and Peonv Gooch
To place fill within a regulated area and construct in a flood plain on Lot 8C, Registered
Plan 3493, (51 Park Drive, Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed
as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material within a fill regulated area for landscaping purposes and to
construct a replacement retaining wall within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Landscape Plan; prepared by Landscape Garden Designs; Drawing No. 1, dated October
1993; received on October 8, 1993.
B242 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(H) Julian Milakowski
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 11, Registered Plan M-1116, (Pine Ridge Avenue
- Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill material within a fill regulated area in conjunction with the construction
of a new single family dwelling.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Paul Masterbroek, Designer & Planner; Project No. 93620; Sheets 3 & 4,
dated June 15, 1993; received on October 1, 1993.
(2) Sedimentation Control Fence Installation Detail; Figure 1, dated October 19, 1993; received
on October 20, 1993.
(I) Sammar Holdings
To place fill within a regulated area and construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 8,
Concession 7, (94 Clarence Street, Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill within a fill regulated area to prepare the site for grass sod and
construct a new single family dwelling within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Dero Building Designs Consultants Inc.; dated July 16/93; received
on October 15, 1993.
(2) Floor and Elevation Plans; prepared by Dero Building Designs Consultants Inc.; Project No.
9387; Sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8, dated July 16, 1993; received October 15, 1993.
(3) Silt Fence Installation Details; received on October 15, 1993.
(J) City of Vaughan
To alter a watercourse on Uplands Golf Course in the City of Vaughan, Don River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to reconstruct a pedestrian bridge over the Don River (East Branch) in Uplands Golf
Course.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Cansult Engineering Ltd.; Project No. 93219; Drawing Numbers SP1,
S 1, dated received October 8, 1993.
(2) Plans; prepared by Cansult Engineering Ltd.; Project No. 93219; Drawing Number SP2,
revision 2; dated October 21, 1993.
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B243
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(K) The City of Vaughan - Public Works Department
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 5 & 6, Concession 7, (5020 Highway #7,
Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill within a fill regulated area to backfill the trench excavation required for
the installation of a 300 mm diameter watermain.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan; prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd.; Project No. 3642; Drawing No. 1, dated
July 1993; received on October 13, 1993.
(2) Sedimentation Control Fence Installation Detail, Figure 1 dated October 19, 1993; received
on October 20, 1993.
(L) Vince Vialiatore & Cynthia Manna
To place fill within a regulated area and construct in a flood plain on Lot 16, Registered Plan
M -1114, (14 Birch Hill Road - Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a single family dwelling and to place fill within a fill regulated area
within the Regional Storm flood plain.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by E. Di Francesco; Drawing No.s A -1. A -2 & A -.3, revised date October 25,
1993; received November 3, 1993.
(M) Arthur L. Weaver
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 24, Concession 8, (15 Howland Mill Road), in the
City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a 2.1 metre x 3.6 metre swimming pool change house within the
Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan and Elevation Plan; prepared by A.L. Weaver; received on September 20, 1993.
B244 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(N) Islington Golf and Country Club
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on Part Lot 8, Concession A,
(45 Riverbank Drive), in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill within a fill regulated area and to alter the channel of Mimico Creek to
control streambank erosion.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.; Project No. 92980; Figure 2, revision
date July 26, 1992, received on July 28, 1993; Figure 3, dated June, 1993, received on
September 2, 1993; Figure 3A dated September, 1993, received October 12, 1993.
(0) Metro Toronto Parks and Property
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 10, Concession 3 FH, (Scarlett Woods Golf
Course), in the City of Etobicoke, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned
by MTRCA.
The purpose is to undertake regrading works in the flood plain of the Humber River in order to
facilitate the reconstruction at Hole #5 and Hole #6.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Scarlett Woods Golf Course Drawing; prepared by Metro Toronto Parks and Property
Department /R.F. Moote Associates; Drawings 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 3, 4; dated
April, 1993.
(2) Planting Plan; prepared by Metro Toronto Parks and Property Department; dated
October, 1993; revised November 1, 1993.
(P) Metropolitan Toronto Works Department
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 3, Range 1 K.R., (Berry Park - North), in the City of
Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on property owned by the City of
Etobicoke.
The purpose is to undertake erosion control works on an existing exposed section of the South
Mimico Sanitary Trunk Sewer.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) South Mimico Sanitary Trunk Sewer Erosion Control Plans; prepared by Metropolitan
Toronto Works Department; Job No. 93 -385; Drawings 1 - 4, dated October, 1993.
(2) Detail of Temporary Armourstone Diversion Structure Plan; prepared by Metropolitan
Toronto Works Department; Job No. 93- 130 -93 -385; dated October 21, 1993.
(3) Partial Diversion Structure Plan; prepared by Metropolitan Toronto Works Department; Job
No. 93 -385; dated October 26, 1993.
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B245
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(Q) Metropolitan Toronto Works Department
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 6 and 9, Registered Plan 718, (Berry Park - South), in
the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on property owned by the City
of Etobicoke.
The purpose is to undertake erosion control works on an existing exposed section of the South
Mimico Trunk Sanitary Sewer.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan for South Mimico Sanitary Trunk Sewer Erosion Control at Man Hole #16; prepared by
Metropolitan Toronto Works Department; Job No. 93 -130; Sheets 1 - 4; dated
September, 1993.
(2) Temporary Armourstone Diversion Plan; prepared by Metropolitan Toronto Works
Department; Job No. 93- 130 -93 -385; dated October 21, 1993.
(3) Partial Diversion Structure Plan; prepared by Metropolitan Toronto Works Department; Job
No. 93 -385; dated October 26, 1993.
(R) Mr. & Mrs. L. Corso
To place fill within a regulated area on 118 Westwood Lane, in the Town of Richmond Hill,
Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose to regrade and place fill in a fill regulated area to allow for the construction of a pool.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Redline Revision Grading and Demolition Plan, Corso Residence; prepared by Landscape
Planning Ltd.; Project 92.43; Drawing L.12; received October 15, 1993.
(T) L. and C. Rubin
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 2, Registered Plan 2473, (1 17 Mildenhall
Road), in the City of North York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to place fill during the construction of a new residence in a fill regulated area of the
Don River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Trow Ltd., dated October, 1993.
(2) Cross - section Plans A, B and C; prepared by Trow Ltd.; dated received October 12, 1993.
(3) Letter from H. Loshe of Trow Ltd.; dated October 8, 1993.
B246 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(U) Mr. David Wright
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 52, 53, and 54, Registered Plan 3054, (67
and 69 Glenwood Crescent), in the Borough of East York, Don River Watershed as located
on property owned by David Wright and E. Leckie.
The purpose is to regrade in order to stabilize an existing slope instability problem.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Regrading Plans and Cross- Sections; prepared by David A. Wright; revised as received
November 7, 1993.
(2) Rehabilitation Plan; prepared by David A. Wright; received November 12, 1993.
(V) Consumer's Gas
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 5, Concession 7, (14th Avenue, west of 9th
Line), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by
The Town of Markham.
The purpose is to install a gas pipeline under the Little Rouge River.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan, Gas Main Crossing the Rouge River on 14th Avenue, Lot 6, Concession 8, Town
of Markham, Consumer's Gas; received November 25, 1993.
(W) The Woodbine Emporium Corporation
To alter a watercourse, on Part Lot 10, Concession 3, (8409 Woodbine Avenue), in the
Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct an outfall.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Woodbine Emporium Site Servicing and Grading Plans; prepared by Masongsong - Atkari
Engineering Ltd.; Project #MA- 91168; Drawing SSG -1; received August 25, 1993.
(2) Woodbine Emporium Landscape Plan and Details; prepared by Alexander Budrevics Assoc.
Ltd.; Project #92 -570; Sheet L1 and L2; received October 21, 1993.
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B247
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(X) L. Hookham and S. Alison
To construct in a flood plain on (26 Hopecrest Crescent), in the City of Scarborough, Don
River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a fence within the Regional Storm flood plain.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan Drawing Detail; prepared by L. Hookham & S. Alison; received September 21,
1992.
(2) Fence Detail, 26 Hopecrest; prepared by L. Hookham & S. Alison; received September 29,
1993.
(Y) Shiraz Jiwa
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 64, Registered Plan 4702, (33 Gully Drive), in the City
of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a roof over a patio.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan for Lot 64, Registered Plan 4702, City of Scarborough; prepared by applicant;
received August 30, 1993.
(2) Sketch Showing Dimensions of Structure for Lot 64, Registered Plan 4702, City of
Scarborough; prepared by applicant; received August 30, 1993.
(Z) Couas Investments Ltd.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 21, Concession 2, (2040 Valley Farm
Road), in the Town of Pickering, Duffin Creek Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to place fill in order to level an existing depression caused by the removal of a
demolished building.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Proposed Regrading Plan; prepared by Cougs Investments Ltd.; revised as received
September 27, 1993
(2) Cross - Section Plan; prepared by Cougs Investments Ltd.; dated September 24, 1993.
8248 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93, NOVEMBER 26, 1993
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
16. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(AA) Town of Aiax
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 9, Concessions 2 and 3, (Taunton Road and Rossland
Road), in the Town of Ajax, Duffin Creek Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to replace an existing culvert in order to facilitate the widening of Rossland Road.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Letter regarding the proposed temporary drop structure; prepared by the Town of Ajax;
received November 16, 1993.
(2) Rossland Road West - Miller Creek Culvert Plan; prepared by Totten Simms and Hubicki
Associates; Project No. 42 -8238; Drawing No.s C1 and S1; revised as received October
20, 1993.
(3) Rossland Road West - Miller Creek Culvert Plan; prepared by Totten Simms and Hubicki
Associates; Project No. 42 -8238; Drawing No. 1; as received November 16, 1993.
(BB) Cougs Investments Ltd.
To place fill within a regulated area on 27 Buggey Lane (Salem and Tauton Road), in the
Town of Ajax, Carruther's Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to resurface existing golf cart pathways and install new golf cart pathways and to
resurface greens.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Pathway Location Plan; prepared by Cougs Investments Ltd.; received September 21,
1993.
(2) Pathway Swale Cross - section Drawings; prepared by Cougs Investments Ltd.; received on
September 21, 1993.
NOVEMBER 26, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 B249
JOINT MEETING OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/93 AND FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION
ADVISORY BOARD #5/93
The Executive Committee adjourned at 9:40 a.m. for a short recess. The Chair, William Granger,
called the joint meeting of the Executive Committee and the Finance and Administration Advisory
Board to order at 9:45.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
Res. #E197/93
Res. #F32/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Paul Palleschi
THAT the Executive Committee and the Finance and Administration Advisory Board consider two
confidential personnel items in closed session.
The board rose from closed session.
Res. #E198/93
Res. #F33/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Peter Oyler
CARRIED
THAT Res. #E194/93 #F29193, Res. #E195/93 #F30/93 and Res. E196/93 #F31/93, as adopted in
closed session, be ratified.
CARRIED
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:30 a.m., November 26, 1993.
William B. Granger J. Crain Mather
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
/bb.
Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
er the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
Y
DECEMBER 3, 1993
minutes
8250
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #10/93
The Executive Committee met at the Authority office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday
December 3, 1993. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m.
Res. #E199/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Committee sit as a Hearing Board.
PRESENT FOR HEARING:
HEARING
Bronek and Lucinda Bednarz
Lois Hancey
Richard O'Brien
CARRIED
Chair William Granger
Vice -Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
Richard O'Brien
Application 279/92/ETOB for permit, under Ontario Regulation 158, by Bronek and Lucinda Bednarz
for permission to place fill in a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Lot 131, Plan M-
636 (832 Royal York Road), in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed.
Res. #E200193
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lois Hancey
THAT the Hearing Board recess until 10:30 a.m. to allow for consultation with Authority's lawyers.
Res. #E201/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Executive Committee reconvene as a Hearing Board.
CARRIED
Richard O'Brien
Lois Griffin
CARRIED
B251 DECEMBER 3, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #I 0/93.
HEARING (CONTD.)
A staff presentation was made by John Maletich, Manager, Regulations Administration.
Mr. Ron Bednarz, owner of 832 Royal York Road, Etobicoke, spoke in support of his application
submitting pictures and a written report.
Res. #E202/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lois Griffin
THAT the Board consider the permit application by Mr. Bednarz in closed session.
The Board rose from closed session.
DECISION OF HEARING BOARD
CARRIED
THAT the application by Bronek and Lucinda Bednarz for permission to place fill in a regulated area
and to construct in a flood plain on Lot 131, Plan M -636 (832 Royal York Road), in the City of
Etobicoke, Mimico Creek Watershed be approved.
Res. #E203/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Executive Committee reconvene.
Lois Hancey
Lois Griffin
CARRIED
PRESENT FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Chair William Granger
Vice Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
Richard O'Brien
ABSENT
MINUTES
Res. #E204/93
Members
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #9193 be approved.
Paul Palleschi
Jim Witty
Richard O'Brien
Lois Hancey
CARRIED
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93, DECEMBER 3, 1993 B252
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995
WATERFRONT COMPONENT AND LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION
PROJECT 1992 -1994 / ETOBICOKE SECTOR
- Etobicoke Hydro Property
KEY ISSUE
Status of negotiations for possible purchase of the Etobicoke Hydro property, east side of
7th Street, south of Lakeshore Drive.
Res. #E205/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Richard O'Brien
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the staff report dated November 18, 1993,
regarding the status of negotiations relating to the possible acquisition of the Etobicoke Hydro
property, being Part of Lots 5 & 6, Registered Plan 1592, situate on the east side of 7th Street,
south of Lakeshore Drive in the City of Etobicoke, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT Etobicoke Hydro be requested to convey the land to the Authority, at the
nominal consideration of 52.00 with the Authority being responsible for payment of all legal and
survey costs involved with completion of the sale.
AMENDMENT
Res. #E206/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Richard O'Brien
THAT the staff report and the letter from Peter A. Leon, Chairman, Etobicoke Hydro, dated
September 27, 1993, be forwarded to the Councils of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
and the City of Etobicoke for their information and endorsement of the Authority's request.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The availability for acquisition of surplus Etobicoke Hydro property, situate on the Shoreline of Lake
Ontario in the City of Etobicoke, was brought to the attention of Authority staff during the spring
of this year.
The Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto at its meeting held on August 11, 1993,
recommended that The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, be requested to
acquire the Etobicoke Hydro surplus property adjacent to Cliff Lumsden Park, being the subject site.
Discussions have been underway for several months between staff of the Authority and staff of
the Etobicoke Hydro. A letter from Peter A. Leon, Chairman, Etobicoke Hydro, dated September
27, 1992 was circulated with the agenda.
B253 DECEMBER 3, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995
WATERFRONT COMPONENT AND LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT REGENERATION
PROJECT 1992 -1994 / ETOBICOKE SECTOR (CONTD.)
- Etobicoke Hydro Property
While the subject property falls within the confines of the Authority's masterplan for acquisition
along the Lake Ontario Shoreline and is adjacent to current Authority holdings, funding for
acquisitions of this nature are extremely limited. In other instances, the Authority has been able to
secure public lands at nominal consideration.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved masterplan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding will be required at such time as a satisfactory purchase price can be negotiated.
2. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995 FLOOD
PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT
-Duffins Creek Watershed, 784745 Ontario Inc.
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located north of Highway #2, west of Riverside Drive, Town of Ajax, under
the "Interim Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1993 -1995" Flood Plain and
Conservation Component, Duffins Creek Watershed.
Res. #E207/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lorna Jackson
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.18 acres, more or less, be purchased from
784745 Ontario Inc., said land being Part of Lot 17, Concession 2, Town of Ajax, Regional
Municipality of Durham;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00 plus vendor's legal costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93, DECEMBER 3, 1993 B254
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 -1995 FLOOD
PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT (CONTD.)
- Duffins Creek Watershed, 784745 Ontario Inc.
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A97/93, Authority Meeting #4/93, May 28, 1993 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's solicitor, Marilyn Bergman of the firm of
Owens Wright Barristers and Solicitors.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004 -1 1 -502 - Flood Control Hazard Account.
3. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 - 1995
FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT
-Don River Watershed, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located south of Lawrence Avenue, east of the Don Valley Parkway under
"Interim Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1993 - 1995 ", Flood Plain and Conservation
Component - Don River Watershed.
Res. #E208/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lorna Jackson
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 15.3 acres more or less, be purchased from
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto said lands being Part of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, East
of Yonge Street and Part of Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4, East of Yonge Street, City of North York,
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, together with a 100 year lease over 3.7 acres, more or Tess
being part of the road allowance between Concession 3 and 4, East of Yonge Street, the widening
by Registered Plan 4566 and Part of Lot 3, Concession 4, East of Yonge Street, City of North York,
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
B255 DECEMBER 3, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 - 1995
FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT (CONTD.)
Don River Watershed, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
THAT the purchase price be the nominal sum of $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land and lease rights required free from
encumbrance, subject to existing service easements and other existing registered interests;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A97/93, Authority Meeting #4/93, May 28, T993 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with officials of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. The
Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with the
purchase of the property.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004-11-502 - Flood Control Hazard Account.
4. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND
-139 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough
5. WILD WATER KINGDOM LEASE
Res. #E209/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Brian Harrison
THAT agenda item 5, Wild Water Kingdom Lease and added agenda item 9, Potential Disposal of
Surplus Authority Land at 139 Sylvan Avenue, Scarborough, be discussed in closed session.
CARRIED
The board rose from closed session.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93, DECEMBER 3, 1993 8256
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND
-139 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough
KEY ISSUE
To recommend disposal of surplus Authority owned land at 139 Sylvan Avenue, City of
Scarborough.
Res. #E210/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Brian Harrison
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a residential lot at 139 Sylvan Avenue
containing 0.4 acres, more or less, designated as Part of Lot 121, Registered Plan 2235, City of
Scarborough, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, be declared as surplus to the requirements of
the Authority;
THAT the availability of the subject land be advertised publicly for sale at market value.
AND FURTHER THAT the sale be subject to the purchaser either demolishing or moving the existing
dwelling from the land being retained by the Authority at this location onto the surplus lot at the
purchaser's expense.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Executive Meeting #5/93, held on July 9, 1993, Resolution #E105/93 was adopted:
"THAT the staff report dated 1993.06.29. concerning a request for exchange of
lands in the Scarborough Sector of the Lake Ontario Waterfront be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to continue with the public process for the
potential disposal of lands at this location, in accordance with Authority policy and
report further to the Executive Committee concerning this matter at a future date."
The Authority in this instance received a request from Gwen Agboat to exchange 463 Guildwood
Parkway for Authority land at 139 Sylvan Avenue.
In respect to the proposed exchange the following action was taken:
(a) The proposed exchange has been reviewed with officials of the City of Scarborough
and the City has no objection to the exchange;
(b) A public meeting concerning shoreline protection works in the Sylvan Avenue area
of the City of Scarborough, was held on June 2, 1993, at 116 Sylvan Avenue.
Owners to the immediate east of 139 Sylvan Avenue expressed a concern with the
potential of the residence currently on the property being relocated and a portion of
the property being returned to private ownership;
B257 DECEMBER 3, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND (CONTD.)
-139 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough
(c) Authority technical staff have reviewed the Authority holding at 139 Sylvan Avenue
and feel that there is a sufficient portion of the property that can be disposed of to
create a residential lot with the slope land and a sufficient buffer still being retained
in Authority ownership.
In view of the interest expressed by residents in the area, additional public input should be sought
through the public land disposal process prior to a recommendation for disposal being made.
The land proposed to be declared surplus is not required for Authority purposes.
In accordance with Authority policy the following action has been taken to date with respect to the
proposed disposal:
• a sign was installed in July, 1993, on the subject property inviting public comment;
• notices of public information sessions were sent to the City of Scarborough, The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, members of the public who called for information,
local and Metropolitan Toronto Councillors, and Waterfront Regeneration Trust;
• notice of public information sessions and request for public comment was placed in
The Scarborough Mirror on October 3, 1993;
• a Public Information Session was held on October 6, 1993, at 166 Sylvan Avenue
during the hours of 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.;
• Authority staff, including representatives from the Property and Administration
Section and Water Resources Division, were on hand throughout the information
session;
• a public information package was available during the Public Information Session
and was mailed out to parties who had expressed an interest in the property;
• members of the public were invited to attend the Executive Committee on
November 26, 1993, and make submissions or comments.
At Executive Committee Meeting #9/93, held on November 26, 1993, Resolution #E186/93 and
Amendment #E187/93 was adopted:
"THAT the staff report regarding 139 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough dated
November 12, 1993, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to review all public submissions and
comments received and provide a further report to the Executive Committee with a
suggested course of action for the potential disposition of the subject land."
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93, DECEMBER 3, 1993 B258
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LAND (CONTD.)
-139 Sylvan Avenue, City of Scarborough
AMENDMENT Res. #E187/93
"THAT the staff report on the disposal of 139 Sylvan Avenue include the option of
a land exchange with 463 Guildwood Parkway."
The adjacent owner who originally expressed a concern regarding this potential disposal was
present at the Public Information Session and did not provide any written or verbal comments to
the Executive Committee on November 26, 1993. The owner has however requested that the
Authority keep him informed as to the disposition process.
The Authority has had extensive property negotiations over the past several years with owners in
this area during the process of acquiring property rights to carry out shoreline protection works.
Additional property negotiations with owners on Sylvan Avenue, a short distance to the west of
the subject property, are currently underway.
Many parties expressed an interest in the potential purchase of the parcel and enquiries have been
received as to the process for the purchase of the lot.
RATIONALE
Staff feel that it is essential in the management of the Authority's resources that every effort
possible be made to assist in reducing the funding requirements from the taxpayers, and
accordingly, the disposal of this land, if suitable arrangements can be made, is in the best interest
of the Authority and the public.
While Gwen Agboat's original proposal for a land exchange may potentially be the most favourable
arrangement at hand, the Authority has received a number of enquiries regarding the potential
purchase of this property during the public process. It is respectfully submitted that in this
instance it is in the best interest of the Authority to publicly seek proposals for the purchase of this
land prior to finalizing the disposal of the lot.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the funds generated from the sale of this surplus land be utilized to acquire
additional high priority properties within approved Authority projects within the Authority's area of
jurisdiction.
B259 DECEMBER 3, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1110/93
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
5. WILD WATER KINGDOM LEASE
KEY ISSUE
Staff anticipates receiving a proposal from representatives of Wild Water Kingdom for changes to
the existing lease arrangement.
Res. #E211/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lois Griffin
THAT the report dated November 25th, 1993 on a proposal from Wild Water Kingdom for changes
to the existing lease arrangement be referred back to staff with direction to retain necessary
consulting services at a fee not to exceed 82,000.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #10/92, dated November 27th, 1992, the Authority adopted Resolution #197
which reads as follows:
"THAT staff, in consultation with the Authority solicitor, be directed to arrange for the
preparation of an amendment to the agreement on Authority land present /y leased to Wi /d
Water Kingdom Ltd., said land consisting of approximate /y 48.5 acres, at the Claireville
Conservation Area in the City of Brampton, in the Regional Municipality of Peel, to provide
for:
• the maximum percentage rent payable to the Authority to be 8 %, 1993 to 1997,
and renewab /e thereafter, subject to Authority approval;
THAT said agreement be subject to the issuance of an Order in Council in accordance with
section 21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C -27;
THAT the appropriate Authority officia /s be authorized and directed to take whatever action
may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and
the execution of any documents;
AND FURTHER THAT the 1992 percentage rent for the months of August, September and
October be deferred and payab /e by June 30th, 1993 plus interest from the due date at
prime interest plus one percent."
Staff have continued to meet on a regular basis with representatives from Wild Water Kingdom and
to monitor the activities of the Water Park during the 1993 operating season. Members will recall
that in June of 1993, the representatives of the Water Park requested a further deferral of rent
through the 1993 operating season with appropriate interest paid to the Authority.
The Water Park had a successful summer and elected to pay the rent in August of 1993, making
the deferral unnecessary.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93, DECEMBER 3, 1993 B260'
SECTION 11 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
5. WILD WATER KINGDOM LEASE (CONTD.)
ANALYSIS
The Water Park completes its year -end October 31, 1993, and is awaiting the production of the
audited financial statements. Representatives of the Water Park have met with staff of the
Authority and we anticipate that they will be making representation to the Authority for further
changes to the leasing arrangement.
6. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LANDS
- Humber River Watershed, Claireville Area, City of Brampton
KEY ISSUE
Staff report on the status of the public process concerning the potential disposal of surplus
Authority -owned lands in the Claireville area of the City of Brampton. Members of the public have
been invited to attend before the Executive Committee to make submissions or comments.
Res. #E212/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lorna Jackson
THAT the staff report regarding potential disposal of surplus Authority -owned lands in the
Claireville area of the City of Brampton, dated November 15, 1993, be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to review all public submissions and comments received and
provide a further report to the Executive Committee with a suggested course of action for the
potential disposition of the subject lands.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #1/93, held February 26, 1993, Resolution #A19/93 was adopted:
"THAT the request for potential disposal of three parcels of Authority -owned land,
situate north and south of Highway #7, in the Claireville and Ebenezer areas, be
referred to staff for review in accordance with established Authority policies;
AND FURTHER THAT a report recommending further action in this matter be
brought forth to the Executive Committee at a future date."
B261 DECEMBER 3, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93 •
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
6. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LANDS (CONTD.)
- Humber River Watershed, Claireville Area, City of Brampton
The Authority, in this instance, received a request from the City of Brampton to consider three
parcels of land as surplus to the Authority's requirements. These parcels are more particularly
described as follows:
Parcel 'A':
Parcel 'B':
Parcel 'C':
Located on the north side of Highway #7, east of Goreway Drive,
being Part of Lot 6, Concession 8, Northern Division, City of
Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, containing 6 acres, more or
less, of vacant land.
Located on the south side of Highway #7 on the east side of
Goreway Drive, being Part of Lot 5, Concession 8, Northern Division,
City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, containing 12 acres,
more or less, of vacant land.
Located on the west side of the Eighth Line, north of Steeles
Avenue, being Part of Lot 2, Concession 8, Northern Division, City
of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, containing 56 acres,
more or less, of vacant land.
These parcels proposed to be declared surplus are not required for Authority purposes.
In accordance with Authority policy the following action has been taken to date:
• signs were installed in July, 1993 on the subject lands inviting public comment;
• notices of public information sessions were sent to the City of Brampton, the Regional
Municipality of Peel, members of the public who have called for information and Authority
members in the Regional Municipality of Peel;
• notice of public information sessions and a request for public comment was placed
in the Brampton Guardian on October 10, 1993;
• a Public Information Session was held on October 14, 1993, at the Etobicoke Field
Studies Centre during the hours of 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.;
• members of the public have been invited to attend the Executive Committee to
make submissions or comments.
Authority staff including representative from the Property and Administrative Section and the Field
Operation Division were on hand throughout the information session.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93, DECEMBER 3, 1993 B262
SECTION I1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
6. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LANDS (CONTD.)
- Humber River Watershed, Claireville Area, City of Brampton
Staff prepared a public information package for distribution. This package was available during the
Public Information Session and was mailed out to parties who had expressed an interest in the
property.
A copy of a letter dated October 29, 1993, received from Mary Wright and a copy of a comment
sheet from Alyson Hazlett, together with the response from the Chief Administrative Officer, was
distributed with the Executive agenda.
It should be noted that staff have received a number of verbal comments through telephone calls
and from visitors at the Public Information Session. The only comments received from phone calls
and the Public Information Session related to southern parcel (Parcel 'C'). The comment related to
a concern about the visual impact any development on this parcel would have on the remaining
Claireville holdings. This concern could be addressed through the agreement of purchase and sale
by requiring the purchaser to construct a berm or vegetative buffer to mitigate this visual impact.
The City of Brampton has expressed an interest in purchasing the land.
The Regional Municipality of Peel had earlier advised the Authority that the Region had no objection
to the land being declared surplus.
In addition to the above noted and attached letter, a number of enquiries have been received from
parties interested in purchasing the lands and as to the process for the purchase of the parcels.
It is proposed that the disposal of the lands be at market value. It is further proposed that the
availability of the lands be publicly advertised for sale.
RATIONALE
Staff feel it is essential that in the management of the Authority's resources that every effort
possible be made to assist in reducing the funding requirements from the taxpayers, and
accordingly, the disposal of these lands, if suitable arrangements can be made, is in the best
interest of the Authority and the public.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the funds generated from the sale of these surplus lands be utilized to acquire
high priority properties within approved Authority Projects within the Authority's area of
jurisdiction.
B263 DECEMBER 3, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93
SECTION It - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. VEHICLES
-1994 Replacement Requirement and Surplus Disposal
KEY ISSUE
Authorization to replace four vehicles in 1994 and to dispose of replaced units by trade -in.
Res. #E213/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT staff be authorized to proceed with tendering for the replacement of
Unit #20, #21, #31 and #34;
THAT the vehicles identified for replacement in 1994 be declared surplus;
AND FURTHER THAT the surplus vehicles be disposed of by trade -in.
BACKGROUND
Richard O'Brien
Lorna Jackson
four vehicles for 1994:
CARRIED
In accordance with the Authority's Disposal Policy, units in the Authority's vehicle and equipment
fleet that are to be replaced must be declared surplus and if the aggregate value of the items is
estimated to be greater than $10,000 approval of the Executive Committee is required.
RATIONALE
The vehicles to be replaced in 1994 are part of the Authority's chargeback system and have an
estimated value of:
Vehicles
' #20 1988 Chev One Ton
#21 1988 GMC One Ton
• #31 1988 Ford 3/4 Ton
` #34 1988 Chev One Ton 4x4
Total
* Deferred 1993 replacement.
Estimated Replacement
Trade -In Value Budget
$3,500.
3,500.
2,500.
4, 500.
$28,000.
28,000.
22,500.
28, 500.
14,000. $107,000.
The preliminary list of vehicles identified for replacement in 1994, as reviewed by the Staff
Equipment Committee, totalled eighteen; seven of which were 1993 deferred replacements. Staff
reviewed each vehicle with the respective work centres to determine a projected replacement
schedule based on vehicle condition, maintenance history, operating and repair costs, and mileage.
Based on this review, the Committee identified four units which need to be replaced in 1994. The
balance of the vehicles will be re- examined for replacement in 1995 or 1996.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93, DECEMBER 3, 1993 B264
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. VEHICLES (CONTD.)
-1994 Replacement Requirement and Surplus Disposal
RATIONALE
Vehicle #20 - A 1988 Chev 1 -Ton, Heart Lake Conservation Area
Mileage as of November 1, 1993 was 91,653 km.
Unit has been costly to maintain in 1993, with a significant amount of downtime
due to major engine repairs.
Repair costs in 1993 to date are $2,981 and total $12,849 for the life of the
vehicle.
Vehicle #21
Vehicle #31
A 1988 GMC 1 -Ton, Conservation Services.
Mileage as of November 1, 1993 was 94,053 km.
Unit has had significant amount of downtime for repeat servicing of brake system
and rear axle. Problems are projected to continue and further investment in repairs
is not warranted and may not correct problem.
Repair costs in 1993 were $1,700 and total $16,249 for the life of the vehicle.
A 1988 Ford 3/4 -Ton Supercab Pickup, Black Creek Pioneer Village
Mileage as of November 1, 1993 was 68,406 km.
Vehicle body is in poor condition and front end work is required.
Maintenance costs were high in 1993 in comparison to usage, totalling $1,300 and
total $6,230 for the life of the vehicle.
Vehicle #34 - A 1988 Chev 1 -Ton Cab and Chassis, 4X4, Albion Hills Conservation Area
Mileage as of November 1, 1993 was 66,755 km.
Unit is used for snow removal and sanding as part of winter operations. Rust and
frame fatigue are a concern for continued operations.
Unit had a repair cost of $1,000 for fire damage due to an electrical short.
Repair costs approximately $2,400 in 1993, as a result of numerous mechanical
component failures and replacement, and total $9,001 for the life of the vehicle.
Disposal by trade -in is recommended because:
• this has been the approved method for the past seven years;
• vehicle tenders have generally provided trade -in allowances in excess of the
Authority's book value. Even if vehicles are received late, the trade -in value offered
on the accepted tender is guaranteed;
• replacement vehicles are received too late for spring auctions and retaining same to
a fall auction decreases value further while increasing repair costs.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for acquisition of the above four replacement vehicles have been identified in the 1994
Preliminary Budget Estimates and are available from the Equipment Reserve. No levy is required for
vehicle replacement.
B265 DECEMBER 3, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
8. APPOINTMENT TO THE CITY OF NORTH YORK PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
KEY ISSUE
Appointment as citizen representative on the City of North York's Planning Advisory Committee.
Res. #E214/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Lorna Jackson
THAT the staff report dated November 12, 1993, advising of the appointment of John W. Maletich
as citizen representative on the City of North York's Planning Advisory Committee, be received
AND FURTHER THAT Mr. Maletich be congratulated on his appointment.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
John W. Maletich has been appointed as a citizen representative on the City of North York's
Planning Advisory Committee. His duties will commence in December 1993.
There are usually two meetings per month which occur on designated Wednesdays and which
commence at approximately 2:00 p.m. The number of regular working hours away from his
workplace will amount to approximately three hours a month. I feel that this time away from his
work will not interfere with John's ability to carry out his job tasks with the Authority. John has
agreed that he can make up any hours taken away from his workplace by working extra hours
and /or taking the time in lieu.
If a situation arose where the services of the Manager, Regulation Administration were required at
the same time as the Planning Advisory Committee meeting, then Mr. Maletich would be expected
to attend to the Authority's programs and responsibilities. This is understood and agreed to by
Mr. Maletich.
There is no statutory conflict of interest in his appointment to the Committee and his employment
with the Authority. In any event, conflict of interest may be declared if the City of North York
were to deal with an Authority situation, so as to avoid any possible conflict.
This appointment will be advantageous and beneficial to both public agencies because of John's
interest in conservation, the environment and a safe healthy community.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93, DECEMBER 3, 1993 B266
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. DECISION OF HEARING
KEY ISSUE
The hearing Board, on the matter of Bronek and Lucinda Bednarz, reported to the Executive
Committee.
Res. #E215/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
AND FURTHER THAT Application 279/92/ETOB for permit,
Bronek and Lucinda Bednarz for permission to place fill in a
flood plain on Lot 131, Plan M -636 (832 Royal York Road),
Watershed, be approved.
ON A RECORDED VOTE
THE MOTION WAS
YEA
Lois Hancey
Lorna Jackson
Richard O'Brien
William Granger
Richard O'Brien
Lorna Jackson
under Ontario Regulation 158, by
regulated area and to construct in a
in the City of Etobicoke, Mimico Creek
NAY
Brian Harrison
Lois Griffin
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
KEY ISSUE
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
CARRIED
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such
area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be approved or refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority,
the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
B267 DECEMBER 3, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
Res. #E216/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lorna Jackson
THAT permit applications listed herein as (D) (E) (F) and added permit application (I) be granted in
accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the period of December 3, 1993 to December 2, 1995
in accordance with the information contained within the reports.
Res. #E217/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
CARRIED
Lois Griffin
Lorna Jackson
THAT permit application listed herein as (A) be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158
for the period of December 3, 1993 to December 2, 1995 in accordance with the information
contained within the report.
Res. #E218/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Lois Hancey
CARRIED
THAT permit applications listed herein as (C) and (H) be granted in accordance with Ontario
Regulation 158 for the period of December 3, 1993 to December 2, 1995 in accordance with the
information contained within the reports.
CARRIED
(A) Andrew and Irene Lis
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 11, Registered Plan M -1116, (3 Pine Ridge
Avenue, Woodbridge), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill within a fill regulated area behind proposed retaining walls in the front
and rear yards.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site and Cross - section Plan; submitted by A.I. Lis; received on November 9, 1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93, DECEMBER 3, 1993 8268
SECTION I1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(B) Tamuva Holdings Inc.
Withdrawn.
(C) M.L. Reimer
To alter a watercourse on Lot 105, Registered Plan 2155, (381 Lake Promenade), in the
City of Etobicoke, Lake Ontario Waterfront as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill within a fill regulated area to complete shoreline armourstone erosion
protection works.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Mary Lynn Reimer; received on October 7, 1993.
(D) Ken Dickinson
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 13, Registered Plan 334, (141 Lakeland Crescent), in
the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to construct a new structure within the proposed Special Policy Area for the Lake
Wilcox flood plain.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Elevation Plans for 141 Lakeland Crescent proposed residence of Mr. and Mrs.
Dickinson as received on May 14, 1992.
(2) Site Plan Survey Drawing, 141 Lakeland Crescent; prepared by P. Salna Company Ltd.; as
received on May 14, 1992.
(E) Keith & Susan Acton
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12, Concession 9, (80 Mill Street), in the
Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, Duffin Creek Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to place fill in the flood plain to reduce the maintenance in a wet area of a lawn.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Cross Section showing original grades and proposed grades, 80 Mill Street, Stouffville;
prepared by applicant; Received November 4, 1993.
(2) Site Plan showing area proposed to be filled, 80 Mill Street, Stouffville; prepared by
applicant; Received November 4, 1993.
B269 DECEMBER 3, 1993, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(F) Cougs Investments Ltd.
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 5, Concession 5, (27 Buggey Lane), in the Town of
Ajax, Carruther's Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to regrade and to extend an existing culvert on the golf course in order to increase
the playability of the 17th and 18th holes.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Relocation of Ponds, Holes 17 and 18, Deer Creek Golf a^ : Country Club; prepared by
Cougs Investments Ltd.; received on September 21, 1993.
(G) Arvida Development Corporation
Withdrawn.
(H) Ivan and Viola Cava'
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 124, Registered Plan 2172, (385 Lake
Promenade), in the City of Etobicoke, Lake Ontario Waterfront as located on property
owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill within a fill regulated area to complete shoreline armourstone erosion
protection works.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; submitted by Ivan & Viola Capaj; received on November 24, 1993.
!I) Metropolitan Toronto Parks and Property Department
To place fill within a regulated area and alter a watercourse on Part Lots 21 - 23,
Concession 2 EYS, (East Don River north of Finch Avenue East), in the City of North York,
Don River Watershed as located on property owned by MTRCA.
The purpose is to place fill for the construction of a pedestrian trail, undertake erosion protection
works and rehabilitate an existing bridge.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by R.V. Anderson and Associates Ltd.; Contract No. P- 382 -92; Sheets 1 -9,
dated August, 1993.
(2) Letter of undertaking; from G. Armour, Metro Parks and Property; dated November 30,
1993.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/93, DECEMBER 3, 1993 B270'
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
NEW BUSINESS
ONTARIO REGULATION 158
Res. #E219/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Lois Hancey
THAT Councils of the local municipalities within the Authority's area of jurisdiction be requested to
ensure that the senior building officials are aware of the areas which may be affected by the
Authority's Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation;
AND FURTHER THAT the senior building officials be requested to advise the public of the
Authority's interests where applicable.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:45 a.m., December 3, 1993.
William B. Granoer J. Crain Mather
Chair
/bb.
CARRIED
Secretary- Treasurer
Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
y
minutes
JANUARY 7, 1994
B271
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #11/93
The Executive Committee met at the Authority office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday
January 7, 1994. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:
Chair William Granger
Vice Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
Paul Palleschi
Jim Witty
ABSENT Member Richard O'Brien
MINUTES
Res. #E22O/93 Moved by: Lois Hancey
Seconded by: Jim Witty
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #10/93 be approved.
CARRIED
The Late Mr. William Gordon McLean
Jim Witty informed the Committee of the death of the former Mayor of Ajax, Mr. William Gordon
McLean. Mr. McLean also served as an Authority member from 1981 to 1988, being appointed
during that time as a member of the Executive Committee and as Vice Chair and Chair of the Water
and Related Land Management Advisory Board.
Res. #E221/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Lois Hancey
THAT the condolences of the Authority be forwarded to the family of the late Mr. W.G. McLean
and that a tree be planted in his memory through the Tree Donation Program of The Conservation
Foundation of Greater Toronto.
CARRIED
B272 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93, JANUARY 7, 1994
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. INTERIM GREENSPACE PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 1993 - 1995
FLOOD PLAIN AND CONSERVATION COMPONENT
- Westside Cemetery Holdings Limited, Don River Watershed
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of property located north of Highway 401, west of Yonge Street under "Interim
Greenspace Protection and Acquisition Project 1993 - 1995 ", Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Don River Watershed.
Res. #E222/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Paul Palleschi
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.777 acres, more or less, be purchased from
Westside Cemetery Holdings Limited, said land being an irregular shaped parcel of land being Part
of Lot 13, Concession 1 W.Y.S., City of North York, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, located
north of Highway 401, west of Yonge Street;
THAT the purchase price be $5,000.00, plus vendor's legal costs;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A97/93, Authority Meeting #4, May 28, 1993 approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with Leslie F. Forder of Loopstra, Nixon & McLeish Barristers &
Solicitors, representing the owner.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Flood Control Hazard Account, 004-11-502.
JANUARY 7, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93 B273
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. NORTH YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD - LAND EXCHANGE
-1785 Finch Avenue, West, City of North York
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from the North York Public Library Board, to explore the possibility of a land
exchange involving small fragments of land, to resolve an encroachment problem.
Res. #E223/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Paul Palleschi
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from the North York Public Library Board to
enter into an exchange of lands located in the vicinity of 1785 Finch Avenue West, in the City of
North York, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority, that it is in the best interest of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to proceed
with this exchange;
THAT the Authority enter into an exchange of lands on the following basis:
(a) North York Public Library Board will convey to the Authority a parcel of land containing
0.12 acres more or less, being Part of Lot 20, Concession 4, W.Y.S., City of North York,
The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
(b) The Authority will convey to North York Public Library Board, a parcel of land containing
0.12 acres, more or less, being Part of Block E, Plan M945, City of North York, The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
(c) North York Public Library Board is to be responsible for payment of all legal, survey and
other costs involved in completion of this exchange;
THAT said exchange be subject to an Order In Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of The Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter 27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary
approvals and execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The existence of an encroachment problem at this location was brought to the attention of the
Authority by staff of the Metro Parks and Property Department during 1991, at which time the
North York Public Library Board was proposing a major expansion at this location and requesting a
conveyance of a substantial parcel of Authority -owned land.
B274 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93, JANUARY 7, 1994
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. NORTH YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD - LAND EXCHANGE (CONTD.)
-1785 Finch Avenue, West, City of North York
The earlier request of the North York Public Library Board was not supported and Authority staff
advised that a revised request for an exchange of lands on the basis as currently presented, would
be recommended by staff.
In order to assure the Authority that the fragment of land being conveyed is not used for any
building proposals that may come forward in the future and in order to ensure that the subject
lands are only utilized to resolve the current encroachment problem, the North York Public Library
Board has agreed that a covenant be included in the deed to the effect that no filling takes place or
no construction of new structures other than improvements or extensions to existing walkways and
parking areas will be undertaken on the parcel being conveyed.
The proposed exchange of lands has been approved by the Council of the City of North York.
The land being disposed of by the Authority consists of a fragment of table land being part of a
much larger area acquired by the Authority in 1966 from Canday Holdings Ltd. and Brad -Jay
Investments Ltd. under the Black Creek area of the Humber River Flood Plain Land Component of
the Land Acquisition Project.
3. CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NORTH YORK
- Request for permanent easements for a drainage channel located north of Finch Avenue
between Bayview Avenue and Leslie Street
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from the Corporation of the City of North York to provide permanent
easements for a drainage channel located north of Finch Avenue between Bayview Avenue and
Leslie Street.
Res. #E224/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
Brian Harrison
Paul Palleschi
WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request
from the Corporation of the City of North York to provide permanent easements for a drainage
channel located north of Finch Avenue between Bayview Avenue and Leslie Street;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co- operate
with the Corporation of the City of North York in this instance;
JANUARY 7, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93 B275
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NORTH YORK (CONTD.)
- Request for permanent easements for a drainage channel located north of Finch Avenue
between Bayview Avenue and Leslie Street
THAT permanent easements containing 0.169 hectares, more or less, (0.418 acres) be granted to
the Corporation of the City of North York for a drainage channel, said land being Part of Lot 22,
Concession 2, E.Y.S. and Part of Lot 1, Plan MX -10, City of North York, The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto, designated as Parts 1 and 2 on Plan 64R -14042 and Part 2 on Plan 66R-
16712;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00;
THAT said easements be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Corporation of the City of North York is conveying to the Authority at this location 25 acres of
valley land together with permanent access rights across a portion of the former old Cummer
Avenue road allowance.
The subject lands were acquired from Don River Heights Ltd. in April, 1963 and The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto in August, 1965 under the Willowdale Dam and Reservoir Project.
4. REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK
-The Etobicoke Waterfront Partnership ( "EWP ")
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of partial takings from properties located on the south side of Lakeshore Boulevard West
from The Etobicoke Waterfront Partnership (Camrost Developments) under the "Revised Project For
The Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park ".
Res. #E225/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a total of 8.086 acres, more or less, be
purchased from The Etobicoke Waterfront Partnership ( "EWP "), consisting of the parcels set out
herein, all situate in the City of Etobicoke, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, on the basis
as set out below:
B276 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93, JANUARY 7, 1994
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK (CONTD.)
-The Etobicoke Waterfront Partnership ( "EWP ")
(a) Parts 2 and 6 on draft reference plan prepared by Wildman, Stewart, Young Limited under
their File No. 9334/9335, dated January, 1993 containing 2.207 acres, more or less;
(b) Parts 2 and 4 on draft reference plan prepared by Wildman, Stewart, Young Limited under
their File No. 9337/9338, dated January, 1993 containing 1.887 acres, more or less;
(c) Parts 2 and 6 on draft reference plan prepared by Wildman, Stewart, Young Limited under
their File No. 9341 to 9345 dated January, 1993 containing 3.525 acres, more or less;
(d) Part 3 on draft reference plan prepared by Wildman, Stewart, Young Limited under their File
No. 9354 dated December 23, 1992 containing 0.467 acres, more or less.
In addition, EWP is to convey to the Authority all littoral, shoreline and riparian rights that the EWP
lands or lands of EWP to the north or west of the EWP lands above described have or enjoy;
THAT the acquisition price be the nominal consideration of S2.00, plus the conveyance to EWP of
good title to a parcel of land containing a total area of 0.959 acres, more or less, consisting of
lands designated as Parts 10 and 11 on draft reference plan prepared by Wildman, Stewart, Young
Limited under their File No. 9341 to 9345, dated January 1993;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the lands required free from encumbrance subject to
service easements required and any other property interests to be retained as identified in Letter of
Intent dated December 10, 1993 and as to be modified in the final Agreement of Purchase and
Sale;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete this transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred by the Authority incidental to the closing
for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid by the Authority;
THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary
documentation required, and obtain any additional approvals required;
AND FURTHER THAT an agreement of Purchase and Sale be prepared on the general basis as set
out in the Letter of Intent dated December 10, 1993 (Appendix EX.13/93), subject to clauses and
conditions being resolved in a manner acceptable to the Authority's solicitor and the Authority's
partners in the "Revised Project For The Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park ".
AMENDMENT
Res. #E226/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Jim Witty
THAT completion of this transaction be subject to the approval of the City of Etobicoke, The
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the Province of Ontario;
JANUARY 7, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93 B277
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK (CONTD.)
-The Etobicoke Waterfront Partnership ( "EWP ")
AND FURTHER THAT in arranging for preparation of this agreement of Purchase and Sale, staff
review and modify items 5(d) and 8 as stated in the Etobicoke Lakefront Corporation Letter of
Intent dated December 10, 1993, Appendix EX. 13/93.
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Approval of the project at Authority Meeting #3/93, April 23, 1993, by Res. #A68/93:
"THAT the status report on the Etobicoke Motel Strip Secondary Plan (C -65 -861 and
related documents be received;
THAT the Revised Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park (March
19931, involving a total estimated expenditure of $8,350,000. be adopted;
THAT The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be requested to approve the
Revised Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park (March 19931;
THAT in considering the Revised Project, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
be advised that the funding commitment can be achieved within the Authority's
approved capita/ funding ceiling;
THAT pursuant to Section 24 of the Conservation Authorities Act, approval of the
Revised Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park by. the Minister of
Natural Resources, and, as necessary, the Ontario Municipal Board, be requested;
THAT the Province of Ontario, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and City of
Etobicoke be advised that the Authority approves the Etobicoke Motel Strip
Waterfront Park Partnership Agreement (February 26, 19931 among the public
agencies which incorporates the following funding formu /a: one - third, Province of
Ontario; one - third, City of Etobicoke; and one - third, MTRCA (50 %, Province of
Ontario and 50 %, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto);
THAT the 1993 work program be approved at an estimated cost of $2,400,000.
subject to approval of the Revised Project by the Minister of Natural Resources and
the Partnership Agreement by all parties;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officia /s be authorized and directed
to implement the Project including obtaining the required approva /s thereto, and the
execution of any documents."
8278 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93, JANUARY 7, 1994
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK (CONTD.)
-The Etobicoke Waterfront Partnership ( "EWP ")
Negotiations have been conducted with officials of The Etobicoke Waterfront Partnership and their
solicitors and in addition to Authority staff have included, the Authority's solicitors, officials of the
Province of Ontario, The City of Etobicoke, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the
Waterfront Regeneration Trust.
The Director of the Water Resource Division is in agreement with this proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of this property on the basis as set out.
A map of the area was available at the meeting.
TERMS OF PURCHASE
The salient points are as set out in the Letter of Intent, dated December 10, 1993, Appendix
EX.13/93. While the proposal of EWP is acceptable in principle, and most of the major issues have
been resolved as set out in the Letter of Intent, certain items require further minor modification.
Due to the urgency of dealing with this matter related to the expectation that negotiations for land
acquisition would be completed within 18 months of the secondary plan approval announced in
January 1993, because of its impact on other property negotiations on the Motel Strip, and the
fact that most of the conditions which require modification, are items beyond the control of the
Authority, it is felt essential that this matter be dealt with at this time.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the acquisition boundary of the "Revised Project For The Etobicoke
Motel Strip Waterfront Park" and represents the first major acquisition under this project. This
acquisition provides the Authority with a substantial portion of the lands required. It is respectfully
submitted that the proposed acquisition is fair and reasonable and is recommended for approval by
the members of the Authority.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this project is available under Account Code 208 -40 -512 Etobicoke Motel Strip.
JANUARY 7, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93 B279
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. MEMBERSHIP TO THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO
-Re- appointment of Kenneth A. Smee
KEY ISSUE
The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto appoints members for a three year term.
Res. #E227/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Paul Palleschi
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the membership of Kenneth A. Smee be
renewed for a further three -year term, December 21, 1993 - December 20, 1996.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
"UPON APPROVAL made by the board of directors of The Conservation Foundation of Greater
Toronto at its meeting held Tuesday, December 14, 1993, THAT the membership of K. A. Smee be
renewed for a further.three -year term - December 21, 1993 to December 20, 1996 - subject to the
necessary approval of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority."
Approval is now being requested to comply with the guidelines set out in the Conservation
Foundation's Charter and By -Laws.
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
6. APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
KEY ISSUE
Appointment of Enforcement Officers and designation as Provincial Offences Officers.
Res. #E228/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT J. Randall Patterson and Michael D. Gillespie be appointed as
Enforcement Officers for the purpose of enforcing regulations made by The Metropolitan Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority, pursuant to Section 28 and 29 of the Conservation Authorities
Act;
AND FURTHER THAT the Minister of Natural Resources be requested to designate J. Randall
Patterson and Michael D. Gillespie as Provincial Offences Officers.
CARRIED
B280 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93, JANUARY 7, 1994
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
6. APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS (CONTD.)
BACKGROUND
For the purpose of enforcing the regulations made by The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority, pursuant to Section 28(1) of the Conservation Authorities Act, it is
necessary for the Authority to appoint personnel as Enforcement Officers. This appointment
pertains to Ontario Regulation 158 made under Sec. 28 of the Act and Ontario Regulation 119
made under Section 29 of the Act.
It is also necessary to have our Enforcement Officers designated as Provincial Offences Officers in
order that they may commence proceedings under the Provincial Offences Act to enforce:
(a) Trespass to Property Act;
(b) Off Road Vehicles Act;
(c) Motorized Snow Vehicles Act;
(d) Regulations made under Sections 28 and 29 of the Conservation Authorities Act.
7. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
KEY ISSUE
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such
area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be approved or refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority,
the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Res. #E229/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
THAT permit applications listed herein as (A) to (1) inclusive, be granted in accordance with Ontario
Regulation 158 for the period of January 7, 1994 to January 6, 1996 in accordance with the
information contained within the reports.
CARRIED
JANUARY 7, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93 8281
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(A) The Regional Municipality of Peel - Department of Public Works
To place fill within a regulated area and alter a watercourse on Part Lots 12, 13 & 14,
Concession 6 EHS, (west side of Airport Road, between Bovaird Drive and Countryside
Drive), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to alter a waterway by installing a trunk sanitary sewer across three tributaries of
the west Humber River and to place fill within a fill regulated area for stockpiling of topsoil and
backfilling the trench created by the sewer pipe installation.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by McCormick Rankin, Consulting Engineers; Sheets 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 11 and 12, dated November 1993; received on December 20, 1993.
(B) Arvida Development Corporation
To alter a waterway on Part Lot 15, Concession 7, (Rutherford Road, Islington Avenue), in
the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to realign a tributary of the Humber River in order to facilitate the development of a
residential plan of subdivision (19T- 88098).
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan; prepared by Urban Ecosystems Ltd.; Job No. 93055; Drawing G4, third submission
dated November 29, 1993.
(2) Plan; prepared by G.M. Sernas and Assoc. Ltd.; Job No. 8617; Drawings SWM -1, dated
November 29, 1993; Drawings SWM -2 - SWM -4, dated December 1992; reprinted
December 7, 1993.
(3) Plan; prepared by M.B.T.W. Landscape Architects & Urban Designers; Drawings CD -1 -
CD-3, revision 2 dated December 1, 1993.
(C) Donald R. Hayhoe
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 24, Concession 9, (30 Stevenson Avenue,
Kleinburg), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
The purpose is to place fill within the fill regulated area for landscaping around an existing off -
stream pond.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan; prepared by Donald R. Hayhoe; received on October 25, 1993.
B282 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93, JANUARY 7, 1994
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(D) Tamuva Holdings Inc.
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 103 and 104, Registered Plan 9831, (Kipling Avenue,
south of Highway 7), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a storm sewer outfall to a tributary of the Humber River in order to
facilitate the development of two residential plans of subdivision (19T- 87026, 19T- 87027).
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Anton Kikas Ltd.; Project No. 396E -91; Drawing Numbers 1, 6, 11, 16;
dated October, 1992.
(2) Landscape Plan; prepared by Landscaping Planning Ltd. /Anton Kikas Ltd.; Drawing L -3,
revision dated November 15, 1993.
(E) Dr. E. Papini
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 30, Concession 8, (south side of Kirby
Road, east of Highway 27), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
The purpose is to place fill within a fill regulated area for a new driveway associated with the
construction of a single family dwelling.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Grading Plan; prepared by EMC Group Limited; Project No. 93117; Drawing No.
93117 -1, Revision 4, dated December 2, 1993; received December 2, 1993.
(F) 469811 Ontario Ltd. / T A Parkview Homes
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 24, Registered Plan 3659, (110 Westwood
Lane), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
The purpose is to regrade and place fill to allow for the construction of a house.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Lot Grading Plan of Part of Lot 24; Registered Plan 3659; File 93023; Centrehill
Corporation; dated December 9, 1993; received December 9, 1993.
JANUARY 7, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93 8283
SECTION 11 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(G) Aurelio Filice
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 10, Concession 6, (32 Riverbend Road), in the
Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a tool shed.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan showing the location and dimensions of the tool shed at 32 Riverbend Road,
Markham; prepared by applicant; received December 20, 1993.
(H) Georaios Papadopoulos
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 18, Concession 2, (1710 Finch Avenue), in the
Town of Pickering, Duffin Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a temporary sales trailer within the Special Policy Area.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan Survey for Proposed Sales Trailer; prepared by Marble Arch Homes; received
November 29, 1993.
(2) Cross Section Plan, Temporary Sales Trailer; prepared by Marble Arch Homes; as received
on November 29, 1993.
(3) Trailer Plans, Elevations; Drawing No. 1; Project No. 9382; prepared by Marble Arch
Homes; received on November 29, 1993.
(I) Tanny's Tire
To construct in a flood plain on 12 King Road, in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River
Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a sign.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Teksign Inc.; Drawing No. 7836 -D, Sheet 1 of 1; received
November 30, 1993.
(2) Site Plan; prepared by R.D. Tomlinson, O.L.S.; received November 30, 1993.
(3) Elevation Plan; prepared by Teksign Inc.; Map 3; received November 30, 1993.
B284 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/93, JANUARY 7, 1994
SECTION 11 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
7. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(J) Town of Richmond Hill
To alter a waterway on Part Lots 55 & 56, Concession 1 WYS, (Gamble Sideroad), in the
Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to replace an existing culvert.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Redline Revision, Gamble Sideroad Culvert, Town of Richmond Hill; prepared by Cosburn,
Patterson, Wardman Ltd.; Drawing 1, Project #93109; received December 23, 1993.
(2) Gamble Sideroad Culvert Details, Town of Richmond Hill; prepared by Cosburn Patterson
Wardman Ltd.; Drawing #2; Project #93109; received December 23, 1993.
(K) Stemmle Holdings Inc.
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 5, Registered Plan 4840, in the Town of Richmond
Hill, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
The purpose is to construct a paint spray building in the flood plain.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
1. Site Plan; prepared by BCB & Associates Ltd.; Drawing Number 93034 -A1; received
January 4, 1994.
(L) City of Vaughan - Parks Department
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 3 and 4, Concession 8, (Martingrove
Regional Park), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by Management Board Secretariat.
The purpose is to place fill for grading purposes in order to allow for the construction of four
baseball diamonds in a regulated area of the Rainbow Creek.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Landscape Planning Limited; Project No. 93062; Drawings L1 - L5,
revision 4; Drawing L6 revision 2; Drawing L7 revision 3; all dated December 22, 1993.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:00 a.m., January 7, 1994.
William B. Granger J. Craig Mather
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
/bb.
Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace
erthe metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority
y
minutes
FEBRUARY 11, 1994
B285
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #12/93
The Executive Committee met at the Authority office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday
February 11, 1994. The Chair, William Granger, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:
MINUTES
Res. #E230/93
Chair William Granger
Vice Chair Lois Hancey
Members Lois Griffin
Brian Harrison
Lorna Jackson
Richard O'Brien
Paul Palleschi
Jim Witty
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #11/93 be approved.
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
CARRIED
Brian Harrison declared a conflict in Item 10 of these minutes, Request to Support the Renaming of
Meadowvale Road, and did not participate in discussion or vote on this matter as he is a member of
the Board of Management of the Metropolitan Toronto Zoo.
CONDOLENCES
The Executive extended its condolences to the family of the late Mr. David Low, recently retired
Chief Administrative Officer of the Town of Ajax.
B286 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
CORRESPONDENCE
(a) Letter from Denis Kelly, City Clerk, City of North York, dated January 26, 1994, re: Jolly
Miller Site, 3884 Yonge Street, City of North York.
(b) Information from the Workplace Environment Enhancement Committee (WEE)
Res. #E231/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT the Executive thank the members of the WEE Committee for the hard work and exceptional
achievement in enhancing the environment at head office.
CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LANDS
- Claireville Conservation Area, City of Brampton, Humber Watershed
KEY ISSUE
Summary of review by Authority staff, including input through the public process, in response to a
request from the City of Brampton to explore the possibility of three parcels of Authority owned
land situate north and south of Highway #7 in the Claireville and Ebenezer areas being declared
surplus to the Authority's requirements.
Res. #E232/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Richard O'Brien
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT two parcels of Authority owned tableland in
the City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, be declared as surplus to the requirements of
the Authority. These parcels are more particularly described as:
(1) south side of Highway #7 on the east side of Goreway Drive being Part of Lot 5,
Concession 8, Northern Division containing 12 acres, more or less;
(2) west side of the Eighth Line, north of Steeles Avenue being Part of Lot 2,
Concession 8, Northern Division containing 56 acres, more or Tess.
THAT along with all existing municipal and provincial controls on the future utilization of these
parcels, the following Authority requirements be conditions of sale:
(a) the Authority is to have the right to review and approve all development plans to
ensure the following:
(i) the proposed use is not contrary to Authority objectives and does
not negatively impact the Authority's Claireville holdings;
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 B287 '
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LANDS (CONTD.)
- Claireville Conservation Area, City of Brampton, Humber Watershed .
(ii) the protection of visual site lines from the valley bottom; i.e., limiting
building height and requiring greater set backs from the property line.
(b) the purchaser be required to prepare a community reach plan if the future
development will impact the valley and stream corridor; i.e., storm water outfall into
valley;
(c) the purchaser construct, in accordance with the Authority's standards, a fence
along the new property boundary at the purchaser's expense;
(d) The purchaser is to establish a vegetated buffer satisfactory to the Authority on the
lands to be retained by the Authority;
(e) An archaeological investigation is to be conducted prior to any site disturbance;
(f) The purchaser will be required to use storm water best management practices and it
is the Authority's preference to have storm water control and /or treatment provided
on the surplus parcels.
AND FURTHER THAT the availability of the subject lands be advertised publicly for sale at market
value.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #1 /93, held February 26, 1993, Res. #A19 /93 was adopted:
"THAT the request for potential disposal of three parce /s of Authority -owned land,
situate north and south of Highway #7, in the Claireville and Ebenezer areas, be
referred to staff for review in accordance with established Authority policies;
AND FURTHER THAT a report recommending further action in this matter be
brought forth to the Executive Committee at a future date."
The Authority, in this instance, received a request from the City of Brampton to consider three
parcels of land as surplus to the Authority's requirements. These parcels are more particularly
described as follows:
Parcel 'A':
Located on the north side of Highway #7, east of
Goreway Drive, being Part of Lot 6, Concession 8,
Northern Division, City of Brampton, Regional
Municipality of Peel, containing 6 acres, more or less,
of vacant land.
B288 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LANDS (CONTD.)
- Claireville Conservation Area, City of Brampton, Humber Watershed
Parcel 'B':
Parcel 'C':
Located on the south side of Highway #7 on the east
side of Goreway Drive, being Part of Lot 5,
Concession 8, Northern Division, City of Brampton,
Regional Municipality of Peel, containing 12 acres,
more or less, of vacant land.
Located on the west side of the Eighth Line north of
Steeles Avenue being Part of Lot 2, Concession 8,
Northern Division, City of Brampton, Regional
Municipality of Peel, containing 56 acres, more or
less, of vacant land.
In accordance with Authority policy the following action has been taken:
(a) Signs were installed in July of 1993 on the subject lands inviting public comments;
(b) Notices of public information session were sent to the following:
(1) City of Brampton;
(2) Regional Municipality of Peel;
(3) members of the public who have called for information;
(4) Authority members of the Regional Municipality of Peel.
(c) Notice of a Public Information Session and a request for public comment was placed
in the Brampton Guardian on October 10, 1993;
(d) A Public Information Session was held on October 14, 1993, at the Etobicoke Field
Studies Centre during the hours of 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.;
(e) Authority staff, including representatives from the Property and Administrative
Section and Field Operations Division were on hand throughout the information
session;
(f) A public information package was available during the Public Information Session
and was mailed out to parties who had expressed an interest in the property;
(g) Members of the public were invited to attend before the Executive Committee of
the Authority and make submissions or comments.
No parties came forward with a formal submission to the Executive Committee on December 3,
1993, regarding this proposal. However, three written submissions were received, two of which
were from the same party requesting to purchase the property. While the verbal comments
through telephone calls and from the Public Information Session held on October 14, 1993, and the
written submissions, have been positive, a concern was received regarding the "whittling down" of
Claireville piece by piece in the coming years. This concern was considered during the review.
Staff has concluded that two of the three parcels do not form an integral part of the Authority's
holding at this location.
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 6289
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
1. POTENTIAL DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AUTHORITY LANDS (CONTD.)
- Claireville Conservation Area, City of Brampton, Humber Watershed
In addition to requesting that the Authority explore the possibility of declaring the lands surplus,
the City of Brampton has expressed an interest in exploring the potential purchase of a parcel for
local park purposes. The Regional Municipality of Peel has advised the Authority that the Region
has no objection to the lands being declared surplus.
RATIONALE
Staff feel it is essential that in the management of the Authority's resources every effort possible
be made to reduce the funding requirements from the taxpayers, and accordingly, the disposal of
these lands, if suitable arrangements can be made, is in the best interest of the Authority and the
public.
Disposal of these lands does not impact the Claireville Reservoir and the lands are outside the
Authority's Master Plan for Acquisition for river valleys.
The parcel situate on the west side of the Eighth Line is a portion of a former farm property
acquired by the Authority in the early 1960's. Only a portion of the property was required for
conservation purposes; however, since the farm buildings were located on the lands required and a
partial taking would have put the farm operation out of business, the entire property was
purchased on the understanding that the surplus land would be disposed of in the future.
After an extensive review of the three parcels by Authority staff, it is respectfully suggested that
while it is felt appropriate that the two parcels situate south of Highway #7 in the Claireville area
be declared surplus at this time, that the parcel located on the north side of Highway #7 east of
Goreway Drive be retained for the following reasons:
(a) to ensure protection of the vegetated community in the southwest corner of
the parcel;
(b) protection of the visual site line from the valley bottom through increased
property line set -backs would be difficult due to the topography and limited
size of the parcel;
(c) The parcel is considerably elevated above the Highway #7 travelled surface
as the highway is sloping downward to the Humber River crossing and
therefore, access to the property is extremely difficult.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the funds generated from the sale of these surplus lands be utilized to acquire
high priority properties within approved Authority projects within the Authority's area of
jurisdiction.
B290 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. SALE OF LAND IN VICINITY OF 3 JENNIFER COURT - CITY OF NORTH YORK
- Giovanni Di Carlo
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The Metropolitan Toronto Encroachment Review Committee to explore
the possibility of a sale of a small fragment of tableland.
Res. #E233/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
Jim Witty
Paul Palleschi
THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a
request from The Metropolitan Toronto Encroachment Review Committee, to proceed with a sale of
a small fragment of Authority -owned tableland, situate adjacent to 3 Jennifer Court in the City of
North York, in The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to complete
a sale to Giovanni Di Carlo in this instance;
THAT a small fragment of Authority -owned tableland containing 0.034 acres, more or less, be sold
to Giovanni Di Carlo, said land being Part of Block B, Plan M -879, City of North York, Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto;
THAT the Authority request the approval of The Ministry of Natural Resources to complete the sale
of the subject land on the following terms and conditions:
(1) the sale price is to be $5.00 per square foot, i.e., 1,500 square feet x $5.00 =
$7,500.00;
(2) Giovanni Di Carlo is to pay all legal and survey costs and the cost of obtaining the
approval of the Committee of Adjustment of the City of North York;
(3) completion of this sale will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be
required;
(4) the transaction is to be completed at the earliest possible date with payment in full
being made to the Authority on closing.
THAT the sale be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section 21(c) of
the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever
action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any necessary approvals
and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 B291
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
2. SALE OF LAND IN VICINITY OF 3 JENNIFER COURT - CITY OF NORTH YORK (CONTD.)
- Giovanni Di Carlo
BACKGROUND
The potential disposal of this fragment of land was brought to the attention of the members of the
Executive Commit-tee on February 12, 1993, and under Resolution #E256192, staff was directed to
report back to the Executive Committee recommending further action.
The subject parcel consists of a fragment of tableland being part of a much larger area acquired
from D.B. Goodman in August, 1962, under Humber River Flood Plain Lands Component of the
Land Acquisition Project.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the proceeds of this sale be used to acquire high priority lands under approved
Authority Land Acquisition Projects.
3. THE HYDRO - ELECTRIC COMMISSION OF THE BOROUGH OF EAST YORK
- Request for a permanent easement for an overhead hydro pole line in the vicinity of
Beechwood Drive and the Don Valley Parkway
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from The Hydro - Electric Commission of the Borough of East York to provide a
permanent easement for an overhead hydro pole line in the vicinity of Beechwood Drive and the
Don Valley Parkway.
Res. #E234/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request
from The Hydro - Electric Commission of the Borough of East York to provide a permanent easement
for an overhead hydro pole line in the vicinity of Beechwood Drive and the Don Valley Parkway;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co- operate
with The Hydro - Electric Commission of the Borough of East York in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.210 hectares, more or Tess, (0.519 acres) be granted to
The Hydro - Electric Commission of the Borough of East York for an overhead hydro pole line, said
land being Part of Lot 15, Concession 2, from the Bay and Part of Lot 1, Registered Plan M -542,
Borough of East York, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, designated as Parts 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 9
on Plan 64R -14017 and Parts 7 and 8 on Plan 66R- 16699;
B292 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
3. THE HYDRO - ELECTRIC COMMISSION OF THE BOROUGH OF EAST YORK (CONTD.)
- Request for a permanent easement for an overhead hydro pole line in the vicinity of
Beechwood Drive and the Don Valley Parkway
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey, administrative and
other costs;
THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Hydro - Electric Commission of the Borough of East York has agreed to assume all legal, survey,
administrative and other costs involved in completing the transaction.
The subject lands were acquired from Domtar Inc. in December, 1989, under the Don River Flood
Plain Lands component of the Land Acquisition Project.
A plan illustrating the specific location was available at the meeting.
4. CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF PICKERING
- Request for a permanent easement for a storm sewer outlet south of the Third Concession
Road, west of Brock Road
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from the Corporation of the Town of Pickering to provide a permanent
easement for a storm sewer outlet, located south of the Third Concession Road, west of Brock
Road.
Res. #E235/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request
from the Corporation of the Town of Pickering to provide a permanent easement for a storm sewer
outlet, located south of the Third Concession Road, west of Brock Road;
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 B293
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
4. CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF PICKERING (CONTD.)
- Request for a permanent easement for a storm sewer outlet south of the Third Concession
Road, west of Brock Road
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority• in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co- operate
with the Corporation of the Town of Pickering in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.003 hectares, more or less, (0.008 acres) be granted to
the Corporation of the Town of Pickering for a storm sewer tsutlet, said land being Part of Lot 19,
Concession 2, Town of Pickering, Regional Municipality of Durham, designated as Part 1 on a Plan
of Survey prepared by Otto Ertl, Ontario Land Surveyor under his Project No. 94 -01;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Corporation of the Town of Pickering has conveyed lands to the Authority over the years for
the nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that this easement be granted for the
nominal consideration of $2.00. The Corporation of the Town of Pickering has agreed to assume
all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing the transaction.
The subject lands were acquired from Trimbats Lane Ltd. in January, 1989, under the Duffins
Creek Flood Plain Lands component of the Land Acquisition Project. The principals of the former
owners of this property are the proponents of the new development which will utilize this outlet.
A plan illustrating the specific location was available at the meeting.
5. CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF CALEDON
- Request for a permanent easement for a retaining wall, overland flow channel and access,
north of 17th Sideroad, east of Highway #10, Town of Caledon
KEY ISSUE
Receipt of a request from the Corporation of the Town of Caledon to provide a permanent
easement for a retaining wall, overland flow channel and access, located north of 17th Sideroad,
east of Highway #10, Town of Caledon.
B294 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994,
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
5. CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF CALEDON (CONTD.)
- Request for a permanent easement for a retaining wall, overland flow channel and access,
north of 17th Sideroad, east of Highway #10, Town of Caledon
Res. #E236/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
Jim Witty
Paul Palteschi
THAT WHEREAS The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a
request from the Corporation of the Town of Caledon to provide a permanent easement for a
retaining wall, overland flow channel and access located north of 17th Sideroad, East of Highway
No. 10, Town of Caledon;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the Authority in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to co- operate
with the Corporation of the Town of Caledon in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 1.08 hectares, more or less, (2.669 acres) be granted to
the Corporation of the Town of Caledon for a retaining wall, overland flow channel and access,
said lands being Part•of Lot 19, Concession 1, E.H.S., Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of
Peel, designated as Part 1 on a Plan of Survey prepared by Anton Kikas Limited under their Job
No. 92 -05 -7;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section
21(c) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary
approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Corporation of the Town of Caledon has conveyed lands to the Authority over the years for the
nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that this easement be granted for the nominal
consideration of $2.00. The Corporation of the Town of Caledon has agreed to assume all legal,
survey and other costs involved in completing the transaction.
The subject lands were acquired from Okson Holdings Inc. et al. in May, 1979, under the Etobicoke
Creek Flood Plain Lands component of the Land Acquisition Project.
A plan illustrating the specific location was available at the meeting.
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 B295
SECTION 1 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK
- Newport Development Corp.
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of partial taking from property located on the south side of Lakeshore Boulevard West
from Newport Development Corp. under the "Revised Project For The Etobicoke Motel Strip
Waterfront Park ".
Res. #E237/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Lois Griffin
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a total of 0.023 acres, more or less, be
purchased from Newport Development Corp., being part of Lot 27, Registered Plan 1176 and part
of Water Lot patented to William John Brown, August 1, 1911 (CLS 56659) and part of Water Lot
CL 1728, City of Etobicoke, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto on the basis as set out below:
(a) Newport Development Corp. is to convey to the Authority in fee simple, the lands
designated as Parts 2 & 4 on draft Reference Plan dated January 1993, prepared by
Wildman, Stewart, Young Limited under their File No. 9347/9349;
(b) Newport Development Corp. is to relinquish all rights and claims to the parcel designated as
Part 1 on Reference Plan 66R- 15676, being Part of the bed of Lake Ontario in front of
Water Lot location CL 1728 and in front of Water Lot patented to William John Brown,
August 1, 1911 (CLS 56659);
(c) Newport Development Corp. is to quit claim, surrender and release all of its right, title and
interest to any riparian rights held or enjoyed by it near or in the vicinity of the lands noted
in (a) and (b) above;
(d) The Authority is to, on closing, transfer and convey all of its right, title and interest to all
density rights, accruing or attaching to the lands noted in (a) and (b) above, as it may now
or hereafter enjoy up to and including eleven units based on a calculation of density at a
rate of 165 units per hectare (67 units per acre) residential units in such form and manner
as may be.reasonably requested by Newport Development Corp. and in accordance with
The Motel Strip Secondary Plan;
(e) The acquisition price for the lands and rights being acquired by the Authority is to be in the
nominal consideration of $2.00;
(f) Newport Development Corp. is to pay to the Authority the sum of $180,000.00;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete this transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer
tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
B296 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK (CONTD.)
- Newport Development Corp.
THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary
documentation required, and obtain any additional approvals required;
AND FURTHER THAT an agreement be finalized on the general basis as substantially set out in the
agreement appended as EX.32/93.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Authority Meeting #3/93, held April 23, 1993, Resolution #A68/93 approving the project, was
adopted:
"THAT the status report on the Etobicoke Motel Strip Secondary Plan (C- 65 -86) and
related documents be received;
THAT the Revised Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park (March
1993), involving a total estimated expenditure of $8,350,000. be adopted;
THAT The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be requested to approve the
Revised Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park (March 1993);
THAT in considering the Revised Project, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto
be advised that the funding commitment can be achieved within the Authority's
approved capital funding ceiling;
THAT pursuant to Section 24 of the Conservation Authorities Act, approval of the
Revised Project for the Etobicoke Motel Strip Waterfront Park by the Minister of
Natural Resources, and, as necessary, the Ontario Municipal Board, be requested;
THAT the Province of Ontario, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and City of
Etobicoke be advised that the Authority approves the Etobicoke Motel Strip
Waterfront Park Partnership Agreement (February 26, 1993) among the public
agencies which incorporates the following funding formula: one - third, Province of
Ontario; one - third, City of Etobicoke; and one - third, MTRCA (50 %, Province of
Ontario and 50%, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto);
THAT the 1993 work program be approved at an estimated cost of $2,400,000.
subject to approval of the Revised Project by the Minister of Natural Resources and
the Partnership Agreement by all parties;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed
to implement the Project including obtaining the required approvals thereto, and the
execution of any documents."
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 B297
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
6. REVISED PROJECT FOR THE ETOBICOKE MOTEL STRIP WATERFRONT PARK (CONTD.)
- Newport Development Corp.
Negotiations have been conducted with officials of Newport Development Corp. and their solicitors.
Officials of the City of Etobicoke have assisted Authority staff and the Authority's solicitors in
arriving at an acceptable arrangement and they are in concurrence with the agreement as
tentatively arranged.
The Director of the Water Resource Division is in agreement with this proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of this property on the basis as set out.
A sketch map of the area and a presentation map was available at the meeting.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the acquisition boundary of the "Revised Project For The Etobicoke
Motel Strip Waterfront Park" and represents the second major acquisition under this project. This
acquisition, particularly with respect to the acquisition of the riparian rights, provides the Authority
with a significant portion of the lands remaining to be acquired under this project. It is respectfully
submitted that the proposed acquisition is fair and reasonable and is recommended for approval.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this project is available under Account Code 208 -40 -512 Etobicoke Motel Strip.
7. STATUTORY RESOLUTIONS FOR THE 38TH ANNUAL MEETING
This item was recommended for approval at Finance and Administration Advisory Board Meeting
#6/93, held January 28, 1993.
KEY ISSUE
The Authority is required to adopt statutory resolutions relating to the appointment of auditors and
the borrowing of money.
Res. #E238/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim Witty
Paul Palleschi
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THAT the following resolutions be
approved and recommended to the 38th Annual Meeting of the Authority:
B298 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
7. STATUTORY RESOLUTIONS FOR THE 38TH ANNUAL MEETING (CONTD.)
a) Appointment of Auditors
THAT Ernst and Young, Chartered Accountants, be appointed as auditors of the Authority
for the year 1994;
b) Borrowing Resolution - 1994
THAT the Authority may borrow from the Royal Bank of Canada or the Authority's member
municipalities or other institutions as may be specifically approved by the Authority up to
the sum of TEN MILLION DOLLARS ($10,000,000.) on the promissory note or notes of the
Authority until payment to the Authority of any grants and of sums to be paid to the
Authority by participating municipalities designated as such under the Conservation
Authorities Act R.S.O. 1990, Chapter 27, at such rate of interest as the Minister of Natural
Resources approves:
THAT the amount borrowed pursuant to this resolution, together with interest, be a charge
upon the whole of the monies received or to be received by the Authority by way of grants,
etc., and when such monies are received, and of sums received or to be received by the
Authority from the participating municipalities as and when such monies are received;
THAT the signing officers of the Authority are hereby authorized to take such action as
may be necessary to give effect thereto:
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Each year the Authority is required to adopt statutory resolutions relating to the appointment of
auditors and the borrowing of money. The Authority's Rules of Conduct, Section XV111, Banking
and Borrowing, require that the borrowing of money by the Authority shall be authorized by a
resolution of the Authority.
The appointment of an auditor is required pursuant to Section 38 of the Conservation Authorities
Act. Staff of the Authority is satisfied with the performance and services of the firm of Ernst &
Young and support their appointment as the Authority's auditors for 1994.
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 B299
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
8. THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO VALLEY AND SHORELINE
REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 - 1996
-5 Kingsbury Crescent Slope Stabilization Project, Lake Ontario Waterfront
-City of Scarborough - Bryce, Alan and Carrie
KEY ISSUE
Purchase of a partial taking from a property located in the vicinity of 5 Kingsbury Crescent in the
City of Scarborough.
Res. #E239/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Richard O'Brien
Paul Palleschi
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.72 acres, more or less, together with a
restrictive covenant over 0.10 acres be purchased from Alan and Carrie Bryce, said land being Part
of Block F, Registered Plan 1538, City of Scarborough, The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto;
THAT the purchase price be 52.00, plus vendor's legal costs. In addition, the Authority is to carry
out slope stabilization works;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the
earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to closing for land transfer tax,
legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to execute all
necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #98, Authority Meeting #3/91, May 3, 1991, approving the project.
Negotiations have been conducted with Isaac Grubner of Goldstein and Grubner, Barristers and
Solicitors, representatives of the owners.
The Director of the Water Resource Division has reviewed this proposal and is in concurrence with
the purchase of the property.
RATIONALE
This property is located within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The funding of this purchase will be charged to Account 142 -14 -502.
B300 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
9. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ANNUAL REPORT
This item was recommended for approval at Finance and Administration Advisory Board Meeting
#6/93, held January 28, 1994.
KEY ISSUE
The Authority is required to report annually to the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario
on Freedom of Information requests.
Res. #E240/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim. Witty
Paul Palleschi
THAT the annual report on Freedom of Information requests dated January 19, 1994, be received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Each year the Authority must report to the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario with
respect to all requests received pursuant to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Legislation.
ANALYSIS
In 1993, the Conservation Authority received a total of six requests under the Municipal Freedom
of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. All of these requests related to general record
information as opposed to personal information.
Three requests were received from individuals, two from businesses and one from an association.
All the requests were dealt with within the time frames provided for in the legislation. The
information requested was disclosed in total in three cases. In one case, the information requested
did not exist and in two cases, the requests were withdrawn.
Three notices were sent regarding third party interest in the information and the possibility of
exemptions. In all cases after consultation, the information was released or the applicant withdrew
the request.
In two cases, the Authority provided copies of records and collected fees totalling $40.00. In two
cases, fees were waived because the cost of copying was very modest.
A complete statistical report on the activities of the Authority relating to the Municipal Freedom of
Information and Protection of Privacy Legislation will be forwarded to the Information and Privacy
Commissioner.
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 B301
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
10. REQUEST TO SUPPORT THE RENAMING OF MEADOWVALE ROAD
KEY ISSUE
The Chairman of the Board of Management of the Metropolitan Toronto Zoo has requested the
Authority's support for the renaming of Meadowvale Road to Zoo Boulevard.
Res. #E241/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Lois Hancey
THAT the Board of Management of the Metropolitan Toronto Zoo be advised that the Authority
supports the renaming of Meadowvale Road northerly from Highway 401, to Zoo Boulevard;
AND FURTHER THAT the Board of Management of the Metropolitan Toronto Zoo be so advised.
AMENDMENT
Res. #E242/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT paragraph one of the motion be amended to read:
Lois Griffin
Lois Hancey
THAT the Board of Management of the Metropolitan Toronto Zoo be advised that the Authority
supports the renaming of Meadowvale Road northerly from Highway 401, to Metro Zoo Boulevard;
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority is in receipt of a letter from Councillor Brian Harrison, Chairman of the Board of
Management of the Metropolitan Toronto Zoo, dated December 8, 1993, requesting Authority
support for the renaming of Meadowvale Road north of Highway 401 to Zoo Boulevard.
It is staff's position that the Authority should support this request as it will raise the profile of the
Zoo and assist it in attracting more visitors.
B302 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
11. TENDER OPENING SUB - COMMITTEE, REPORT #12/93
- Tender # FOD94 -01, One 1994, 1 Ton Stake Truck; Tender # FOD94 -02, One 1994,
1 Ton Crew Cab Stake Truck; Tender # FOD94 -03, One 1994, 1/2 Ton Extended Cab
Pick -up; Tender # FOD94 -04, One 1994, 1 Ton 4 X 4 Stake Truck
KEY ISSUE
The Tender Opening Sub - Committee (Appendix TO. 25/93) opened tenders for the above vehicles
on January 21, 1994. The tenders received were referred to staff for review and report back.
Res. #E243/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT Report #12/93 of the Tender Opening Sub - Committee be received;
Jim Witty
Paul Palleschi
THAT Tender #F0D94 -02 for one 1994 1 ton crew cab stake truck with trade -in of vehicle #21, be
awarded to Northtown Ford Sales, in the total sum of $31,970.80, it being the lowest quotation
received and meeting all specifications;
THAT Tender #F0D94 -04 for one 1994 1 ton stake truck equipped with an 8 foot snowplow with
trade -in of vehicle #34 with snow plow, be awarded to King City Motor Products Limited in the
total sum of $26,657.80, it being the lowest quotation received and meeting all specifications;
AND FURTHER THAT the following staff report be received, advising that pursuant to the
Purchasing Policy, staff has awarded:
Tender #F0D94 -01 for one 1994 1 ton stake truck with trade -in of vehicle #20 to
Stoneleigh Motors Ltd., in the total sum of $24,930.00, it being the lowest quotation
received;
Tender #F0D94 -03 for one 1994 extended cab pick -up with trade -in of vehicle #31 to
Northtown Ford Sales, in the total sum of $13,688.10, it being the lowest quotation
received and meeting all specifications.
CARRIED
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Staff is satisfied that the tenders received from the vendors recommended in this report meet our
requirements. Funds for the acquisition of the vehicles are available in the Vehicle Acquisition
Budget, Account Number 701 -11 -404.
12. THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO VALLEY AND SHORELINE
REGENERATION PROJECT 1992 -1996
- Sylvan Avenue Erosion Control Study - Consultant Selection,
Lake Ontario Waterfront, City of Scarborough
This item was withdrawn from the agenda and will be forwarded to Executive Committee
Meeting #1/94, to be held March 4, 1994.
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1112/93 B303
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
13. CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL, VAUGHAN
- Referral to Ontario Municipal Board
KEY ISSUE
To provide a status update on the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing in the matter of a referral
by Marbloom Investments Ltd. and Wilderton Investments Ltd. to settle and determine terms and
conditions of a site plan and zoning by -law amendment for the development of lands comprising of
Lots 28 and 29, Concession 8, in the City of Vaughan to permit a 27 hole golf course (Crooked
Creek Golf Course) which affects, in part, the valleylands of the East Branch of the Humber River.
Res. #E244/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Lois Hancey
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT staff continue to prepare for the Ontario Municipal Board hearing with
legal representation from the firm of Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Executive Committee on the outcome of the Ontario
Municipal Board hearing.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At Executive Committee Meeting #4/93, June 11, 1993, Resolution #E85/93 was adopted:
"That staff prepare to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing scheduled for June 14,
1993 with legal representation from the firm of Gardiner, Roberts seeking an adjournment
of the hearing, failing which a refusal of the applications wou /d be pursued;
THAT the forested lands comprising Lots 28 and 29, Concession 8 in the City of Vaughan
be formally designated as an Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) based on existing
MTRCA criteria 3, 5 and 6 and that staff determine the boundary of the ESA through the
1993 ESA Update Study;
THAT the Ministry of Municipal affairs and the City of Vaughan be requested to recognize
the Environmentally Significant Area within their appropriate planning documents;
AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Executive Committee on the outcome of the
Ontario Municipal Board hearing."
On June 14, 1993 staff attended the OMB hearing with legal representation from the firm of
Gardiner, Roberts seeking an adjournment to the hearing. Also present at this hearing were the
Ministry of Natural Resources and City of Vaughan.
The Board heard two motions: one by the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
( MTRCA) to have the hearing adjourned and one by the applicant to have the matter of the site
plan deferred pending a decision on the rezoning of the property.
B304 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
13. CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL, VAUGHAN (CONTD.)
- Referral to Ontario Municipal Board
It was the decision of the Board that there were merits in adjourning the hearing given the number
of witnesses to be heard and that only five days had been scheduled. The Board did not, however,
support the motion of the appellant to deal with the matter of the site plan separately from the
rezoning application. Rather, they felt a finalized site plan should result from the hearing.
The Board directed all parties involved in the hearing to meet and identify a list of technical reports
and information which would need to be exchanged and reviewed prior to reconvening. This list
was compiled and the Board directed the appellant to file their reports by no later than October 31,
1993 and the respondents to file theirs by December 15, 1993. The hearing was scheduled to
reconvene on January 17, 1994, for four weeks.
STATUS
On January 17, 1994 the OMB hearing on the Crooked Creek Golf Course proposal reconvened.
Authority staff was present with legal representation from the firm of Gardiner, Roberts.
The Board's first matter of business was to hear a motion of adjournment put forward by the
MTRCA and Ministry of Natural Resources that the Crooked Creek Golf Course proposal be heard in
conjunction with the'proponents referral of OPA 400, the City of Vaughan's Urban Expansion and
Rural Policy Update document.
Pursuant to the Authority's designation of the forested lands on the subject property as an
Environmentally Significant Area, the proponents filed a referral request pursuant to Section 17(11)
of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1983 referring sections of OPA 400 on Woodland Resources, Fisheries
Resources and Wetland Resources to the Board. The proponent referred these policies as a
cautionary measure as they relate to a rezoning and site plan application currently in front of the
Board.
Pursuant to hearing the motion and arguments put forward by opposing counsel, the Board decided
that dealing with the Crooked Creek Golf Course Proposal rezoning and site plan application in
advance of OPA 400 was not in the best interest of good planning, and accordingly this matter
was deferred to be heard concurrently with OPA 400.
14. 1400 LAKESHORE ROAD EAST (FORMER CANADA POST PROPERTY)
- Retention of Consultants
KEY ISSUE
The retention of environmental consultants to carry out asbestos and Polychlorinated Biphenyl
(PCB) surveys of the main building at 1400 Lakeshore Road East (the former Canada Post
Property), Mississauga, and prepare specifications with respect to the removal of these substances
prior to the demolition of the building.
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 B305
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. 1400 LAKESHORE ROAD EAST (FORMER CANADA POST PROPERTY) (CONTD.)
- Retention of Consultants
Res. #E245/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the firm of Pinchin & Associates be retained to conduct both the
asbestos and PCB surveys, and also to provide the Authority with proper direction for the removal
and disposal /storage.
AND FURTHER THAT the cost of this contract be limited to the amount of $11,610.00 excluding
the applicable taxes.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The property is located on the shore of Lake Ontario in the southeast corner of the City of
Mississauga. The property, known municipally as 1352 -1400 Lakeshore Road East, is bounded on
the east and south by Marie Curtis Park, and to the west by the Lakeview Water Pollution Control
Plant and Lakeview Generating Station.
On October 30, 1992, after a full environmental audit of the site, the property was purchased by
the Authority.
The property consists of approximately 15.7 ha of land containing a total of approximately 30,000
square metres of building space. Canada Post, the present occupant of the two buildings at 1400
Lakeshore Road East, will vacate the premises on February 28, 1994. The building at 1352
Lakeshore Road East is used by Ontario Hydro for a training facility, and as a police cadet school.
Ontario Hydro's lease runs until July 1, 1995, and they have expressed interest in extending their
lease.
At the Authority Meeting #9/91 held on January 10, 1992, the following resolution was adopted:
"That upon closing of the transaction, staff be directed to coordinate a detailed planning
study of the property with the involvement of Metropolitan Toronto, the Region of Pee/, the
City of Mississauga, the City of Etobicoke, the Province of Ontario and such individuals and
groups who have an interest in the site."
Early in 1993, the Canada Post Steering Committee (CPSC) was established to oversee the
development of a master park and remediation plan for the property. This committee first met on
June 15, 1993, and includes representation from the Authority (the lead agency); The Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto, Parks and Property and Planning Departments; The Regional Municipality
of Peel, Planning Department; City of Mississauga, Community Services Department and Reality
Services; City of Etobicoke, Planning and Parks and Recreation Departments; Ministry of the
Environment and Energy; Ministry of Natural Resources; and, the Waterfront Regeneration Trust.
The CPSC, at Meeting No. 1/94 on January 26, 1994, agreed that the main building should be
demolished to facilitate the development of the park. The reasons being that excessive costs were
identified with respect to upgrading the main building to meet present fire code regulations;
B306 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. 1400 LAKESHORE ROAD EAST (FORMER CANAbA POST PROPERTY) (CONTD.)
- Retention of Consultants
additional costs were identified with refurbishing the structure to attract potential tenants; we
came to the conclusion that we are unlikely to find a long term tenant capable of providing us lease
payments commensurate with our investment; and, LACAC has indicated that the structure is not
significant enough to warrant preservation.
Prior to the commencement of any demolition project, the asbestos and PCB products within the
structure must be removed in compliance with the applicable codes and regulations. The applicable
regulations are Ontario Regulations 347 and 838 for asbestos abatement, and 0. Reg. 11/82 for
PCB abatement.
In compliance with these regulations, the Authority requested proposals from environmental
consultants (six specializing in PCB abatement and four specializing in asbestos abatement) to
conduct:
(1) a comprehensive survey of the main building and transformer compound at 1400
Lakeshore Road East for PCB products, and provide a PCB remedial action plan
which could be incorporated into demolition tenders; and,
(2) a comprehensive survey of the main building at 1400 Lakeshore Road East for
asbestos products, and provide abatement specifications which could be
incorporated into demolition tenders.
Staff is in receipt of three proposals relating to the PCB component of this project, submitted on
January 31, 1994, by the following consultants:
(1) Pinchin & Associates - $3,650.00;
(2) PPM ;:anada Inc. - $4,605.00;
(3) Trillium Environmental Corporation - $7,350.75.
Staff is in receipt of two proposals relating to the asbestos component of this project, submitted on
January 31, 1994, by the following consultants:
(1) P. Krytiuk & Assoc, Ltd. - $5,980.00;
(2) Pinchin & Associates - $7,960.00.
RATIONALE
Engineering and Development Section staff reviewed all of the proposals and based on the
following criteria: understanding of the scope of work; understanding of the applicable regulations;
organization of their proposal; related experience; and, cost, recommends that Pinchin & Associates
(Pinchin) be retained to conduct both the PCB and asbestos components of this project.
It is the opinion of staff that all three PCB management proposals met the Authority's terms of
reference. Pinchin was chosen because their proposal was the (east costly of the three.
Staff are also recommending Pinchin for the asbestos component of the project because we believe
Pinchin presented a more comprehensive proposal which will meet all of our requirements and
represents the best overall value.
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 B307
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
14. 1400 LAKESHORE ROAD EAST (FORMER CANADA POST PROPERTY) (CONTD.)
- Retention of Consultants
Unlike Krytiuk's proposal, Pinchin's includes provisions for costly intrusive testing, consultation on
the preparation of the demolition tender and on the screening of qualified abatement contractors,
the preparation of abatement inspection and air monitoring guidelines to ensure the abatement
contractor conforms with the applicable regulations, and Tess costly unit costs for quality control
inspections of the abatement work.
In order for Krytiuk to provide these same services, it would cost the Authority $2,160. more than
indicated in their proposal. In addition, each inspection of the abatement work would cost $275.
more. Since a minimum of ten inspections are anticipated for a project of this size, the predicted
savings from the abatement inspection work would be at least $2,750.
In summary, the net cost for Pinchin's proposal is $180. Tess than Krytiuk's - $7,960. versus
$8,140. Furthermore, significant savings would be realized during the abatement phase of the
project.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available for this work under account number 004 -07. Costs for the decommissioning of
the site were identified during the negotiations to purchase the property.
FUTURE BENEFITS
The work is necessary to properly characterize both the extent and nature of PCB and asbestos
products in the building, in order to comply with the applicable codes and regulations associated
with the demolition process.
15. TORONTO ISLANDS SHORELINE MANAGEMENT STUDY
KEY ISSUE
Authorization to retain the services of W. F. Baird and Associates to complete a detailed coastal
and erosion processes study of the Toronto Island Nature School, Gibraltar Point area of Toronto
Islands.
Res. #E246/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Griffin
Lois Hancey
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the consulting firm of W. F. Baird and Associates be retained to carry
out the detailed coastal and erosion processes study for the Toronto Island Nature School, Gibraltar
Point area at a total estimated fee of $85,000 (plus GST), subject to receiving provincial approval
under jobsOntario capital funding.
CARRIED
8308 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION 11 - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. TORONTO ISLANDS SHORELINE MANAGEMENT STUDY (CONTD.)
BACKGROUND
The Toronto Board of Education is proposing to construct a new Toronto Island Nature School on a
site immediately adjacent to the existing school. Based on findings of the coastal processes study
completed by W. F. Baird and Associates in 1993, it was determined that the existing Nature
School site was situated within the Regulatory Shoreline as defined under the draft Provincial
Shoreline Policy Statement. More specifically, the consultant determined that the existing school
was within their estimated 100 -year erosion limits and recommended that a more detailed site
specific erosion processes analysis be completed to provide a more accurate prediction of the long
term shoreline conditions. The level of detailed study requested for this site was outside the scope
of the original study.
The Toronto Board of Education has agreed to delay their decision on proceeding with final plans
for the proposed school until the detailed study is completed in July, 1994.
The Authority has also received a letter from Metro Toronto Parks and Property Department
expressing serious concern about the ongoing erosion at Gibraltar Point that threatens the public
washroom building and other park amenities. Staff at Metro Parks has requested that action be
taken to prevent further damage from erosion.
At the request of the Technical Steering Committee, W. F. Baird submitted a draft Terms of
Reference, proposal and cost estimate to carry out the necessary study at Gibraltar Point.
RATIONALE
The rationale to retain W. F. Baird and Associates to complete the additional study is based on the
following considerations:
the members of the Technical Steering Committee have approved the proposal received
from W. F. Baird and Associates as this would ensure continuity and accountability in the
overall study results
timing is critical in that the School Board has delayed its decision until July, 1994 pending
the consultants' recommendations
there are cost savings in retaining the same consultant because coastal data already
generated and presented in the initial study will not need to be reviewed and /or assessed by
a new consultant
the Technical Steering Committee members are satisfied with the performance of work,
presentation and expertise provided by Baird and Associates in the initial study
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The consultant will more accurately define and analyze the historical changes to the shoreline and
nearshore lake bottom in the vicinity of the Toronto Island Nature School and Gibraltar Point. This
analysis will include a detailed review of the impacts of the existing Island Water Treatment Plant
intake pipes.
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 B309
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
15. TORONTO ISLANDS SHORELINE MANAGEMENT STUDY (CONTD.)
A coastal and erosion processes study will be carried out using state of the art sediment budget
analysis. This information will be used to develop a numerical model to predict the future long term
changes to the lake bed and shoreline conditions.
A final report will summarize the data review and findings and provide recommendations.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The upset fee limit for this study is $85,000 plus GST. Funds are budgeted under Account No.
151 -02, but will be subject to provincial approval of funding under jobsOntario capital. The study
is funded 100% by the Province of Ontario.
16. RETENTION OF LEGAL SERVICES FOR JOLLY MILLER PROPERTY
KEY ISSUE
This report recommends that the law firm of Borden & Elliot be retained to provide legal services
with respect to the discussion relating to the JoIIy Miller Property.
Res. #E247/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Brian Harrison
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the law firm of Borden & Elliot be retained to provide legal services to
the Authority for discussions relating to the JoIIy Miller Property.
CARRIED
ANALYSIS
In discussions with the The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, City of North York staff and our
own review of the issues relating to the possible acquisition of the JoIIy Miller property staff believe
that it would be appropriate to utilize the services of the law firm Borden & Elliot. Staff are
proposing to retain the services of Mr. S. F. Waqut. Mr. Waque has specialized
experience in matters relating to this potential acquisition which would be of assistance to the
Authority. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto has utilized his services for similar
acquisitions and concurs in this recommendation.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Costs have yet to be finalized. Staff are completing background information including appraisal
information which will be of assistance in determining the potential exposure of the Authority with
respect to the project and more specifically, issues such as the cost of legal services. Costs of
this initial consultation process should not exceed $ 10,000. Staff will report to the Executive
Committee at the earliest opportunity on future costs.
B310 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
17. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
KEY ISSUE
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such
area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be approved or refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority,
the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Res. #E248/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lois Hancey
Jim Witty
THAT permit applications listed herein as (A) to (Q) inclusive and added permit applications (R) to
(V) inclusive, be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the period of February 11,
1994 to February 10, 1996, in accordance with the information contained within the reports.
CARRIED
(A) Peter & Heather Sabbagh
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 26, Concession 5 (Albion), (25th Sideroad,
west of Palgrave), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan entitled Residence for Mr. and Mrs. P. Sabbagh; dated November 1993; received
January 11, 1994.
(B) City of Brampton - Public Works Department
To place fill within a regulated area and alter a watercourse on Part Lots 10 and 11,
Concession 10 N.D., (Castlemore Road), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed
as located on property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan; prepared by City of Brampton, Contract No. 93 -110; Drawing P2 -11 Sheet 4; Drawing
P2 -1 Sheet 1; dated October 30, 1992.
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 8311
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
17. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(CI G.O.F. Limited
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 6, Concession 1 NDS, (3160 Gold Orchard
Drive), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by R.E. Winter and Associates Ltd., Michael Gagnon Ltd., and Baker
Salmona Associates Ltd.; Job No. BSA 1215; Drawing No. Al dated July 1991; received
January 11, 1994.
(2) Cut and Fill Calculations and Cross - sections; prepared by R.E. Winter and Associates Ltd;
received January 11, 1994.
(D) Onkar Investments Inc.
To place fill within a regulated area on Block 5, Registered Plan 43M -926, (6835
Professional Court), in the City of Mississauga, Mirnico Creek Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Grading and Servicing Plan; prepared by Skira & Associates Ltd.; Drawing Number
93 -M62, Revision 3; received January 31, 1994.
(E) Board of Trade of Metropolitan Toronto
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 9, Concession 8, (300 Clarence Street), in
the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan showing bunker areas for proposed fill placement; prepared by applicant; received
on December 20, 1993.
(2) Cross - section Plans; prepared by applicant; Figures 1 a, 1 b, 2a, 2b; received January 5,
1994.
(F) Board of Trade of Metropolitan Toronto
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 9,
Concession 8, (300 Clarence Street), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as
located on property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan and Figures 1, 2, and 3 Showing the Storage Bin and Access Driveway; prepared
by applicant; received December 20, 1993.
B312 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
17. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
jG) Trans - Northern Pipelines Inc.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 18 & 19, Concession 6 in the City of North
York and Lot 32, Concession B, in the City of Etobicoke, (southwest corner of Weston
Road and Finch Avenue), Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by
MTRCA.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Aerial Site Plan; prepared by Trans - Northern Pipelines, Drawing Numbers 30 & 31; received
on October 18, 1993.
(2) Redline Revised Excavation & Restoration Plan; prepared by Willings & Associates Ltd.;
Drawing #5; received on January 28, 1994.
(H) Susan Coles Harpur
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lots 47 & 48, Registered Plan 240, (5 Willowbank
Drive), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on property
owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans for a Second Storey Addition, 5 Willowbank Drive; prepared by Martin P. Paivio &
Associates Ltd.; Drawing Numbers 1, 2, & 3; received January 17, 1994.
(I) Oakdale Golf & Country Club
To place fill within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Part Lots 14 & 15,
Concession 5, (2388 Jane Street), in the City of North York, Humber River Watershed as
located on property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; Cosburn Patterson Wardman Limited, Figure 4; received January 7, 1994.
(2) Bridge Lodation Plan; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Limited; Project 92948;
Figure 2; received January 19, 1994.
(3) Bridge Rehabilitation Plans; prepared by Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.; Project 92948;
Drawings ST -1, ST -2 and ST -3; received on January 20, 1994.
(J) East York Hydro
To construct in a flood plain on Pottery Road and the Don Valley Parkway, in the Borough
of East York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by MTRCA and Metro
Toronto Parks Department.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; East York Hydro; Drawing No. 393; revised as received on June 16, 1993.
(2) Sediment Control Detail Plan; prepared by East York Hydro; received on June 16, 1993.
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93 B313
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
17. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(K) Progress City Centre
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lots 21 and 22, Concession 2, (710 Progress Avenue),
in the City of Scarborough, Highland Creek Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan, Loading Dock Addition, 710 Progress Avenue; prepared by Sirlin and Giller
Architects; Project 9338; Drawing Al; received January 20, 1994.
(2) Floor Plan, Loading Dock Addition, 710 Progress Avenue; prepared by Sirlin and Giller
Architects; Project 9338; Drawing A2; received January 20, 1994.
(L) Scarborough Golf & Country Club
To alter a watercourse on 321 Scarborough Golf Club Road, in the City of Scarborough,
Highland Creek Watershed as located on property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Typical Cross - Section, Armourstone Repair Work, Scarborough Golf Club; prepared by
Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.; received January 11, 1994.
(2) Red Line Revised Scarborough Golf & Country Club Erosion Protection Works; prepared by
Cosburn Patterson Wardman Ltd.; Areas 3, 4, 5 & 6; received January 19, 1994.
(M) Vallevwood Gardens Phase II
To alter a watercourse on Part Lots 19 & 20, Concession 1 EHS, (Highway 10 /Mayfield
Road), in the Town of Caledon, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on property owned
by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plans; prepared by Anton Kikas Ltd.; Project No. 387E -90; Drawing 2 dated June 1993;
received February 2, 1994.
(2) Redline Revised Plans; prepared by Landscape Planning; Project No. 93 -01; Drawing L1
dated revised January 31, 1994; received February 2, 1994; revised February 3, 1994.
(N) Devonshire Pine Grove Inc.
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 15, Registered Plan M-1112, (8403 Islington
Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Plan; prepared by Donald C. Griffin, Architect; Drawings L1 and L2 revision dated
December 17, 1993; received February 7, 1993.
8314 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994.
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
17. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(0) Maple Leaf Foods Inc.
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on Part Lot 20, 21,
Concession 4, (West Don River Valley, north of McNaughton Road), in the City of Vaughan,
Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Letter of Undertaking from Peter E. Goddard, Vice President, Maple Leaf Foods Inc. dated
February 9, 1994.
(2) Plans; prepared by Don Naylor and Associates Ltd.; Project 93 -415; Drawings VN -1, VN -2,
VN -3, VN -4, VN -5, VN -6, VN -7, VN -8; FL -1, FL -2; all second submissions dated 2.2.94.
(P) Classicomm Fiberlink Services Ltd.
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 21, Registered Plan 4840, (234 Newkirk Road), in the
Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Thomas Moore Architect; Project #93 -20; Drawing A -1 Revised
February 1, 1994; received February 3, 1994.
(2) Site Services & Grading Plan; prepared by Thomas Moore Architect; Project #93 -20,
Drawing #A -2 revised February 1, 1994; received February 3, 1994.
(3) Landscape Plan; prepared by Thomas Moore Architect; Project #93 -20 revised February 1,
1994; received February 3, 1994.
(Q) Sammy Lee
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 21, Registered Plan 6037, (15 Glenbourne Park
Drive), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on property owned by
same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Redline Revised Site and Elevation Plans; prepared by Far and Dutra Architects Inc.; Project
No. 9309; Drawing Numbers Al, A5 & A8; revised as received February 4, 1994.
(2) Mechanical Drawing; prepared by Far and Dutra Architects Inc.; Project No. 9309; Drawing
No. M1; revised as received on February 1, 1994.
FEBRUARY 11, 1994, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1112/93 B315
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
17. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(R) Gardiner Farms Limited
To alter a watercourse on Part Lot 26, Concession 1 (Albion), (north side of 25 Sideroad,
east of Airport Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Sequencing /Phasing Notes and Drawings; prepared by Dr. Michael Colterjohn, agent on
behalf of Mr. George R. Gardiner; received February 3, 1994.
(S) The Toronto Golf Club
To alter a watercourse and to construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 5, Concession 2 SDS,
(1 157 Dixie Road), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on
property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site Plan; prepared by Sartor and Susin Ltd.; Revision 1; received on February 1, 1994.
(T) Mr. Norman Antonio
To place fill within a regulated area and to alter a watercourse on Concession 548 - 551,
Registered Plan M -76, (2693 - 2697 Lakeshore Blvd. West), in the City of Etobicoke, Lake
Ontario Waterfront as located on property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Layout Details Plan; prepared by H. Sustronk & Associates Ltd.; received December 22,
1993.
(U) Hazelbirch Estates Inc.
To place fill' within a regulated area and to construct in a flood plain on Part Lots 51 and
53, and Lot 52, Registered Plan 240, (16 Willowbank Avenue), in the Town of Richmond
Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: •
(1) Redline Revision, Floor Plans, Elevations, Site Plan & Existing Elevation Profile for
Willowdale Avenue, Lot 52, Town of Richmond Hill; prepared by First Union Inc.;
Project #100/94, Sheet 1; received February 8, 1994.
8316 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/93, FEBRUARY 11, 1994
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY INFORMATION
17. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (CONTD.)
-Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways
(V) IPCF Properties Inc.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lots 11 & 12, Concession 3, (Redway Road), in
the Borough of East York, Don River Watershed as located on property owned by same.
In accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
(1) Site and Grading Plans; prepared by Fred Schaeffer and Associates; Project No. 93 -E -1618;
Drawing Nos. 1 - 3; revised as received on January 31, 1994.
(2) Landscaping Plans; prepared by Starr Planning /Urban Design Landscape Architects; Drawing
Numbers L1 and L2; revised as received on November 11, 1993.
(3) Slope Rehabilitation details; prepared by Starr Planning /Urban Design Landscape architects;
Drawing No. 1; revised as received on February 2, 1994.
NEW BUSINESS
18. AUTHORITY LEGAL SERVICES
Res. #E249/93
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Brian Harrison
Jim Witty
THAT staff explore and report back on the possibility of expanding our use of various legal firms.
CARRIED
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:30 a.m., February 11, 1994.
William B. Granner J. Crain Mather
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
/bb.