HomeMy WebLinkAboutConservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board Appendices 1993c R . 1 /9 5
THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
RECREATION STRATEGY REVIEW
COMMENTS RECEIVED
Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board Meeting #1/93
March 12, 1993
Authority Meeting #2/92
March 26, 1993
RECREATION STRATEGY REVIEW - COMI\IEN T S RECEIVED
AGENCY OR
GROUP
COMMENTS
Township of
Adjala
• No comments received on recreation.
Town of Ajax
• Support the vision but concerned about the impact on municipal levy
and on range of permitted recreation uses.
Town of
Aurora
• If swimming in streams is to be discouraged, can man made
swimming facilities be safe and considered as non - intensive?
• Why is golf acceptable in one policy and not acceptable in another?
City of
Brampton
• No comments received to date.
Town of
Caledon
• Support the proposed vision and agree with withdrawing from active
recreational uses.
• Expansion of existing playing fields in Bolton would have to be
negotiated with the Authority.
• Equestrian tenants should be notified at Palgrave site to obtain their
comments.
• More active uses and facilities should be permitted to expand within
valley and stream corridors subject to meeting all the relevant
environmental policies and criteria.
Regional
Municipality of
Durham
• No comments on recreation.
Borough of
East York
• Strongly endorse the strategy intent.
• Examine a broader list of possible recreation land uses and obtain
further input on acceptable and unacceptable uses (current list will
prevent the Borough from meeting current and future recreation needs
on Authority lands).
1
City of
Etobicoke
• Disagree with the broad brush approach to controlling recreation
activities throughout the watershed. The chronic shortage of Metro park
lands should be recognized in the Strategy to accommodate those
intensive recreation uses that have nowhere else to go. The list of
acceptable uses is too narrow.
Township of
King
• No comments on recreation.
Town of
Markham
• Need clarification on what will and will not be permitted at Milne
Park (Authority owned).
• Question the position that golf and other intensive recreation facilities
will always be unacceptable. This does not allow for "specific
circumstances and opportunities" where the use can be permitted after
conditions have been met
• Permitting active recreation uses in appropriate locations could
generate needed revenue to offset the cost of MTRCA programs.
Municipality of
Metropolitan
Toronto
(See summary of Metro comments for details)
• Recognize a broader range of public outdoor recreation uses based on
community needs and do not list acceptable and unacceptable uses.
• Public uses for outdoor recreation should be limited to those that can
be planned, designed and maintained to meet a set of environmental
standards.
• Sample public opinion to reflect public at large and do more in depth
objective research.
• Economic analysis of cost and revenues on the effect of changes in
public uses should be completed to determine the impact on the
municipal levy.
• Examine the rationale for limiting the public use facilities and
activities.
• Do not adopt the recommendations in the Review until the above
questions have been answered.
• Discuss the report with representatives from local municipalities
(political and recreation departments) within Metro at a workshop.
City of
Mississauga
V
• No comments received to date.
2
Township of
Mono
• No comments on recreation.
City of North
York
--�
• Request a seminar be held with all local and Metro are affected staff 1
and politicians.
• Effect of implementation will be the loss of revenue generating
activities; increased dependency on municipal levies and a reduced
level of activity on Authority lands.
• Nine parks with a total of 14 facilities would be affected if they are
not "grandparented" by the Authority.
• This Strategy conflicts with Metro Toronto's regional recreation
strategy as outlined in their draft Official Plan (the latter identifies golf,
zoos, and other intensive facilities as acceptable on public lands).
• Limited sample size and sector of community is a concern.
• Performance standards are a more appropriate way of screening
proposed Authority land uses and controlling environmental impacts.
• They suggest more investigation and clarification of policy impacts
before it is implemented.
Regional
Municipality of
Peel
• No comments received to date.
Town of
Pickering
• General agreement that passive open space management should
continue in their area with the local municipality providing the more
intensive outdoor recreation activities.
Town of
Richmond Hill
• Acceptable conservation authority land uses should include
stormwater quantity and quality facilities.
City of
Scarborough
(only comments from the Env. Cttee so far)
• Notion of partnerships for revenue generation is worthy of our
support.
3
CR5 93
City of Toronto
• "Ecosystem" approach to planning is too narrow - "human
ecosystem" approach is more appropriate for land use planning.
• Humans and social systems should be considered as part of the
ecosystem rather than as an external force in a natural environment.
• For example, if golf is to be removed from valleys, there must be
provision for them elsewhere to continue to meet the community need
(golf courses could be made to meet Authority concerns).
• Any change to current uses of C.A. lands may involve socio-
economic and environmental impacts beyond MTRCA's lands.
• Suggests a "round table workshop" (one or more) to address the
socio- economic and environmental impacts of making MTRCA lands
more "environmentally appropriate ".
• Narrow sample of people - does not reflect the communities served
and in fact may irritate segments of the population (listing swimming
in natural settings as unacceptable will upset certain residents of
Toronto).
• Changing Area names to "Outdoor Recreation Areas" may imply too
intensive a use for all Authority parks. More appropriate approach
would be to use more than one name to reflect the activities in a given
Conservation Area.
• City Service Cttee requested a report on the following:
- re- examine restricting natural area swimming
and golf courses.
- how the Authority can take a more active role
in the development of trails, parks and
landfill along the waterfront.
Township of
Uxbridge
• No comments received to date.
City of
Vaughan
• No comments received to date.
Town of
Whitchurch -
Stouffville
• No comments received to date.
4
City of York
• Agreement with the proposed philosophy and there is no impact on
the City's recreation facilities or programs from the proposed uses of
Authority lands (i.e. recreation trails and other passive uses).
Regional
Municipality of
York
• Support the vision of Steward of the Watershed.
• Implementation will leave the Region with a shortfall of regional
scale recreation facilities.
• Reduced revenue a concern because municipal levy is the likely
source of any shortfall in future recreation facility operations.
• Need to further investigate the impact of the strategy and the
available options to the Region for Regional scale recreation (Regional
Parks System need ?).
• The Region should participate in any workshops that conduct follow
up investigations on the matter.
Min. of
Tourism and
Recreation
• Support the philosophical basis for policies but disagree with using
opinion survey to rank acceptable and unacceptable uses.
• Suggest we base acceptable and unacceptable uses on an assessment
of the "degree of capability" (compatibility?) with the goal and
objectives of the Authority.
• Suggest developing criteria that could be applied to any proposed
use.
Min. of
Transport.
• no comment.
5
c.cz, 1 /o,,
Min. of Natural
Resources
• Potential inconsistency between recommendation that intensive
recreation activities are phased out (pg. 4) and suggestion of
grandparenting of existing intensive recreation facilities (pg. 20).
• Implementation of the proposed strategy will reduce revenues and
increase capital development costs.
• Funding sources are not adequately identified and are needed given
the likely reduction in future recreation funding.
• Clarify what is meant by artificial swimming pond/lake (reservoir or
pool).
• Question of turning over intensive recreation facilities should be
clarified and what to do with the lost associated revenue from those
facilities must also be addressed.
• Suggest modifying each Conservation Area name to reflect their
activities; "Glen Haffy Forest & Outdoor Recreation Area ", "Petticoat
Creek Recreation Area ".
Min. of
Government
Services
• Concern over restricting campground and golf course operations.
• Need to discuss details with MTRCA as to how active public use
facilities can be "grandparented" and the criteria to be used.
Niagara
Escarpment
Commission
• Gear the Area name to reflect the type and scale of recreation - can't
use just one title.
• Need to identify better accessibility to C.A. lands for the disabled
and physically challenged.
• Possible impact on this Strategy on the suggested changes to the
Conservation Authorities Act - should be checked.
Min. of
Municipal
Affairs
• General support but caution that considerable consultation will be
required prior to implementation.
Kleinburg Area
Ratepayers
Assoc.
• Strongly support the role and philosophy. Willing to work with the
Authority to protect and enhance the natural heritage resources.
Metro RAP
• Heighten public awareness of the lands available and thus make them
more responsive to spending tax dollars on these lands.
6
Toronto Field
Naturalists
• Agree with the recommendations of the report.
• Some reservations about the term "grandparenting" but welcome the
idea of "modifications to increase environmental sensitivity ".
• Bring the policies and practices of Metro Parks into conformity with
the vision of the Recreation Review.
Margaret
Cranmer -Byng
• Strongly supports the vision and direction proposed.
• Concerned that the funding will not be available.
• Suggests an annual "Membership of MTRCA" as part of the solution
- heightens awareness through newsletters and raises needing funding
(e.g. Metro Zoo and ROM use this technique).
Ontario Marina
Operators
• Current park and marina facilities have greatly improved access to
the waterfront, not reduce it.
• Report does not identify the significant increase in tourism as a result
of the current waterfront management program.
Ontario
Equestrian Fed.
• Concern that equestrian uses are considered as unacceptable.
North York
Soccer Assoc.
• Concern that sports fields are considered as unacceptable. Places an
undue hardship on the sport activity in the Metro area.
Field Hockey
Ontario
• Concern that sports fields are considered as unacceptable. Places an
undue hardship on the sport activity in the Metro area.
Ontario Sailing
Association
• Concern that sailing and boat marinas are considered unacceptable.
The recommendations in the report are in conflict with the approved
Metro Waterfront Plan that permits more active recreation uses along
the waterfront.
Linda
Tomasone
• Strong support for the vision.
• So little undeveloped land left in the GTA - "please save it!"
Marshall,
Macklin
Monaghan
• Agree with precluding intensive activity land uses.
• May need an expert in grantsmanship to keep current levels of
funding for recreation.
7
Authority Staff
Review
Workshop
• General agreement with the concerns of municipalities who have a
more direct communication link to their communities.
• Survey sample size was too small and not representative of the
communities we serve.
• Avoid lists of acceptable and unacceptable uses, rather, use a set of
review criteria or standards to screen proposed land use changes (e.g.
Valley & Stream Policy Guidelines for review of Golf Courses).
• Agree with stronger promotion of the many existing environrnental .
enhancement programs along with promotion of public use.
• The ecosystem approach must develop a balanced program which
includes the full spectrum of human uses in outdoor recreation (eg
passive and active uses).
• Inadequate analysis of revenue sources and requirements to feed the
Strategy. What funding will be gained or lost as a result of
implementing the recommendations in the Consultant report?
RECREV \Update.93
Mar /93
3
C,2 ro /q3
SUMMARY
OBSERVATIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
REVIEW OF AUTHORITY POLICIES FOR THE PUBLIC USE OF CONSERVATION
LANDS
THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO, PARKS & PROPERTY
DEPARTMENT
A. OBSERVATIONS (Stated or Combined)
1. Process involved too small a sample for accuracy reflecting population at large
and interest group representation needs to be assessed.
2. The narrowness of acceptable uses and the many unacceptable uses on Metro
Toronto and MTRCA managed lands was noted.
3. The Review did not account for the variance of the lands as to their suitability
for public uses.
4. Broad public support for Authority and its core program is more based on
direct benefits from parks and recreation rather than Steward of the Watershed
(indirect benefit).
5. We must be sensitive to broad social needs and interests which are not
reflected in acceptable facilities.
6. Table lands are sold for development rather than used for broader range of
active recreation uses.
7. No recognition or inconsistent in accommodating tourists.
8. Nature Interpretation facilities and activities do not attract same numbers as
facilities being eliminated nor do they generate as much revenue.
9. Communities depend on Authority lands to meet their outdoor recreation needs
especially in Metro where little open space is available and costly; results in
difficulty in replacing sports facilities and eliminating public golf courses.
10. Private sector urban development will tend to be encouraged on MTRCA table
lands and this will be costly to reclaim as greenspace.
11. Parks Department have naturalized 100's of acres of lands in the past 10 years
and do not need Authority involvement.
12. Replacement of lands to meet Metro's needs will be C ) 100% of cost if
available and may result in Metro (a) reducing its participation in
MTRCA land purchases and (b) reducing or eliminating its financial support
G2i►/93
outside Metro, which was largely equated to its residents use of facilities and
lands.
13. Narrow uses reduces attendance and revenues in Conservation. Areas leading to
larger municipal levies.
14. Environmental priorities are shared by many but should not necessarily narrow
the vision of acceptable recreation if the development is planned, managed and
sensitive to environmental issues.
15. Overreaction by special interest groups jeopardizes the balance of facilities.
B. RECOMMENDATIONS (Stated or Implied)
1. Recognize a broader range of public outdoor recreation uses based on
community needs and do not list acceptable and unacceptable uses.
2. Public Uses for outdoor recreation be limited to those that can be planned,
designed and maintained to meet a set of environmental standards.
3. Classify lands as to their suitability for various public uses and develop a set of
environmental standards.
4. Sample public opinion to reflect public at large and do more indepth objective
research.
5. Economic Analysis of costs and revenues on the effect of changes in public
uses to determine the impact on the municipal levy.
6. Examine the rationale for limiting the public use facilities and activities.
7. Do not adopt the Recommendations in the Review of Public Use.
8. Refer the Report to the Technical Advisory Committee on Parks and
Conservation to examine the issues.
Recreation Strategy Review
Summary of Comments
Recreation Strategy Review
Summary of Concerns
100%
O
80/0
60%
20%
0%
Use List Economics Sample Size
MTRCA 1994 Fee Schedule • Public Facilities and Progran l: (proposed)
Conservation Areas
items 1 to 19
Black Creek Pioneer Village items 20 10 26
Kortright Centre for Conservation items 27 to 29
Miscellaneous
item 30
Discounts items DI to D3
This draft of the 1994 MTRCA Fee
services tax (GST 7%), the gross fee
to the Authority.
Current (1993) fees are listed beside
are shown.
Schedule provides a description of the fee followed by columns reflecting provincial sales tax (PST 8%), the goods and
- which is the price charged to users inclusive of all taxes and the base fee - which is that portion of the gross fee accruing
a column showing a percentage increase or decrease to the fee for 1993. As well, for comparison, fees for 1992 and 1991
* DRAFT • current to October 28, 1993 • please recycle previous versions of this document
Conservation Areas
general admission, annual passes, angling fees
Item description
PST
8%
GST
7%
1994 1994
Base Gross
1993 Percent
fee increase
1992 1991
fee fee
Comment
1.0
For general admission at any Conservation Area, per
day;
1.1 for each adult from fifteen to sixty -four years of
age.
1.2 for each child from five to fourteen years of age.
1.3 for each child four years of age or under.
1.4 for each senior sixty -five years of age or over.
2.0 For any annual pass at any Conservation Area,
2.1 for a family of one or two adults and their children
who are fourteen years of age or under.
2.2 for each adult from fifteen to sixty -four years of
age.
2.3 for each child from five to fourteen years of age.
2.4 for each child four years of age or under.
2.5 for each senior sixty -five years of age or over.
3.0 For fishing in the public ponds at Glen Haffy,
3.1
3.2
per day, for each person fifteen years of age or
over, exclusive of general admission.
per day, for each person fourteen years of age or
under, exclusive of general admission.
0.00 0.16 2.34 2.50 2.00 25.00% 2.00 2.00
0.00 0.08 1.17 1.25 1.00 25.00% 1.00 1.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.11 1.64 1.75 1.50 16.67% 1.50 1.50
0.00 2.94 42.06 45.00 40.00 12.50% 40.00 55.00
0.00 1.18 16.82 18.00 15.00 20.00% 15.00 15.00
0.00 0.59 8.41 9.00 7.50 20.00% 7.50 5.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.79 11.21 12.00 11.00 9.09% 11.00 7.50
First increase since per person fee introduced in 1991.
Anticipated revenue increase $80,000 based on
historical attendance information.
Pass rates adjusted to reflect increase in day visit fees.
Family pass rate 6 day visits for 2 adults & 2
children.
0.00 0.13 1.87 2.00 1.50 33.33 % 1.50 1.50 First increase in 3 years. Charges are additional to
Area admission. Anticpated revenue increase of $2-
3,000 based on historical usage. Revenues off -set fish
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 rearing costs.
* DRAFT current r0 October 28, 1993 please recycle previous versions of this document
Conservation Areas
Glen Haffy Extension pond rentals, building rentals, row Moats, late permit
Item description
PST GST 1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
8% 7% Base Gross fee increase fee fee
4.0 For a permit for the use of a fishing pond at the Glen
Haffy Extension, including general admission and the
use of row boats, per day;
4.1 on weekends and holidays.
4.2 on weekdays.
4.3 for the use of the cabin in conjunction with a permit
issued under 4.1 or 4.2.
5.0 For a permit for the use of the chalet building al Albion
Hills, including general admission per hour, subject to a
minimum four hour rental and requiring a 50% deposit;
5.1 for a youth group, from opening to 6:00 p.m.
5.2 for a youth group, after 6:00 p.m.
5.3 for other groups, from opening to 6:00 p.m.
5.4 for other groups, after 6:00 p.m.
6.0 For the rental of a row boat at Heart Lake, including
oars and lifejackets;
6.1
per hour.
6.2 per half -day (four hours).
7.0 For a permit authorizing a special event extending past
regular operating hours and up to midnight, exclusive of
general admission.
0.00 14.39 205.61 220.00 220.00 0.00% 220.00 220.00 No change. Capital improvements are proposed along
with promotion to increase use.
0.00 8.50 121.50 130.00 130.00 0.00% 130.00 130.00
0.00 5.23 74.77 80.00 80.00 0.00% 80.00 80.00
0.00 1.96 28.04 30.00 30.00
0.00 2.62 37.38 40.00 40.00
0.00 2.62 37.38 40.00 40.00
0.00 3.27 46.73 50.00 50.00
0.42
0.37 5.21
6.00 5.00 20.00%
NA
NA
NA
NA
Current rates are competitive.
First increase since 1990. Estimated additional revenue
5.00 5.00 of up to $1500.
1.46 1.28 18.26 21.00 18.00 16.67% 18.00 18.00
0.00 4.91 70.09 75.00 60.00 25.00% 60.00 60.00 Increase to cover administration costs.
* DRAFT current to October 28, 1993 • please recycle previous versions of this document
Conservation Areas
Group camping, day camping, serviced /unserviced campsites, seasonal camping
Item description
PST GST 1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
8% 7% Base Gross fee increase fee fee
8.0
For a permit to use a designated group campsite, subject
to a limit of seven nights use, per night;
8.1 for a group of up to twenty persons, inclusive of
general admission.
8.2 for each person in addition to the first twenty
First increase in 3 years. Anticipated increase of $2000
0.00 2.62 37.38 40.00 30.00 33.33% 30.00 30.00 based on 200 permits.
persons occupying a group campsite under item 8.1. 0.00 0.08 1.17 1.25 1.00 25.00% 1.00 1.00
9.0 For a permit to occupy a day /group campsite, per
person, per day, inclusive of general admission.
10.0 For a permit to occupy an individual un- serviced
campsite, inclusive of general admission;
10.1 at Albion Hills, per night.
10.2 at Albion Hills, per season.
10.3 at Indian Line, per night.
11.0 For a permit to occupy an individual serviced campsite,
with hydro and water hook -ups, inclusive of general
admission;
at Indian Line, per night.
11.2
First increase in 3 years. Maintains price alignment
0.00 0.08 1.17 1.25 1.00 25.00% 1.00 1.00 with items 1.2 (child general admission) and 8.2 (group
camper).
0.00 0.85 12.15 13.00 12.50 4.00% 12.50 12.50
0.00 52.34 747.66 800.00 800.00 0.00% 740.00 740.00
0.00 0.98 14.02 15.00 14.00 7.14 % 13.50 13.50
0.00 1.24 17.76 19.00 18.00 5.56 17.00 17.00
Rate increases reflect current market and improved
facilities. Seasonal rates at market limit. Anticpated
revenue increases AH - $1350, ILC - $3000.
Anticipated revenue increases AH - $I000, ILC -
$5600.
at Indian Line, per season. 0.00 117.76 1682.24 1800.00 1800.00 0.00% 1700.00 1700.00 Seasonal rates at market limit.
11.3 at Albion Hills, per night. 0.00 1.18 16.82 18.00 17.00 5.88% 16.00 NA
11.4 at Albion Hills, per season. 0.00 75.23 1074.77 1150.00 1150.00 0.00% NA
* DRAFT • current to October 28, 1993 • please recycle previous versions of this document
Conservation Areas
group picnics,_ picnic shelters, fire permits, harbecues /com pots, swimming at Petticoat Creek
Item description
PST GST
8% 7%
1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
Base Gross fee increase fee fee
12.0 For a permit for the use of a group picnic site at any
Conservation Area, exclusive of general admission, per
day;
12.1
for a group of up to 100 persons.
12.2 for each additional fifty or fewer persons, in
conjunction with a permit issued under item 12.1.
12.3 for the use of a picnic shelter with electrical service,
in conjunction with a permit issued under item 12.1.
12.4 for the use of a picnic shelter without electrical
service, in conjunction with a permit issued under
item 12.1
12.5 for the use of a marquee tent, in conjunction with a
permit issued under item 12.1.
12.6 for a permit for a fire in a designated ground fire
pit, in addition to any fees paid under item 12.0.
12.7 for the use of a portable barbecue unit or corn pot,
in addition to any fees paid under item 12.0.
13.0 For admission to the swimming area at Petticoat Creek,
exclusive of general admission;
13.1 per day, on weekends and holidays, for each person
five years of age and over.
13.2 per day, on weekdays, for each person five years of
age and over.
13.3 for each child four years of age or under.
13.4 for a hook of ten pool passes.
0.00 2.62 37.38 40.00 35.00 14.29% 35.00 30.00
0.00 0.65 9.35 10.00 10.00 0.00% 10.00 10.00
0.00 3.93 56.07 60.00 60.00 0.00% 50.00
0.00 3.60 51.40 55.00 55.00 0.00% 50.00 50.00
0.00 45.80 654.20 700.00 700.00 0.00 700.00 NEW
0.00 1.96 28.04 30.00 30.00 0.00% 30.00 30.00
2.78 2.43 34.79 40.00 40.00 0.00% 40.00 40.00
No increase for 2 years. Demand remains strong.
Anticipated additional revenue - $5,000.
Other picnic rates unchanged. Additional shelters
constructed in 1992/93. Need use assessment for future
rates.
0.00 0.11 1.64 1.75 1.50 16.67% 1.50 1.50 No increase in 3 years. Capital improvements proposed
for '94. Anticipated additional revenue - $ 10,000.
0.00 0.08 1.17 1.25 1.00 25.00% 1.00 1.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NEW
0.00 0.82 11.68 12.50 10.00 25.00% 10.00 10.00
* DRAFT • current to Oe:oher 28, /993 please recycle previous versions r f this document
Conservation Areas
swimming passes at Petticoat Creek, commercial photography, cross country skiing
Item description
PST GST 1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
8% 7% Base Gross fee increase fee fee
14.0 For a seasonal pass for admission to the swimming area
at Petticoat Creek, inclusive of general admission;
14.1 for a family consisting of one or two adults and
their children who are fourteen years of age or
under.
Reflects increases to general admissions /pool
0.00 4.25 60.75 65.00 60.00 8.33% 60.00 NA missions.
14.2 for each adult from fifteen to sixty -four years of
age. 0.00 1.64 23.36 25.00 23.00 8.70% 23.00 NA
14.3 for each child from five to fourteen years of age. 0.00 1.11 15.89 17.00 15.00 13.33% 15.00 NA
14.4 for each child four years of age or under. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA
14.5 for each senior sixty -five years of age or over. 0.00 1.18 16.82 18.00 16.00 12.50% 16.00 NA
15.0 For commercial photography or filming in any
Conservation Area or at the Kortright Centre, including
the use of grounds and environs and supervision,
minimum per hour;
15.1
Rates are competitive for our market. Structured to
during normal operating hours. 0.00 3.93 56.07 60.00 60.00 0.00% 60.00 60.00 reflect range of users.
15.2 outside normal operating hours. 0.00 5.56 79.44 85.00 85.00 0.00% 85.00 85.00
16.0 For the use of cross -country ski trails at Albion Hills,
Bruce's Mill, or Palgrave, inclusive of general
admission;
16.1 for each person fifteen years of age or over.
16.2 for each child five to fourteen years of age.
16.3 for each child four years of age or under.
16.4 for a family of one or two adults and their children
who are fourteen years of age or under.
0.00 0.46 6.54 7.00 6.50 7.69% 6.50 6.00
0.00 0.20 2.80 3.00 2.50 20.00% 2.50 2.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 1.11 15.89 17.00 15.00 13.33% 15.00 14.00
* DRAFT • current to October 28, 1993 • please recycle previous versions of this document
First increase in 2 years. Rates reflect facility
level /market position. Estimated additional revenue in
the area of $1500. Highly sensitive to winter weather
cond i t ions.
n
:0
Conservation Areas
cross country trail fees, cross country equipment rentals, Bruce's Mill maple syrup program
Item description
PST GST 1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
8% 7% Base Gross fee increase fee fee
17.0 For a seasonal pass for the use of cross -country ski trails
at Albion Hills, Bruce's Mill or Palgrave, including
general admission;
17.1 for each person fifteen years of age or over.
17.2 for each child fourteen years of age or under.
18.0 For the rental of a cross- country ski equipment package
consisting of skis, boots and poles;
18.1 for each person fifteen years of age or over, per
0.00 2.29 32.71 35.00 35.00 0.00% 35.00 35.00 Sales limited by variable winter weather conditions, no
0.00 0.59 8.41 9.00 9.00 0.00% 9.00 9.00 increase proposed.
No change proposed. Fees reflect level of facility,
day. 0.83 0.73 10.44 12.00 12.00 0.00% 12.00 12.00 equipment offering.
18.2 for each person fifteen years of age or over, per
day, after 1:00 p.m. 0.56 0.49 6.95 8.00 8.00 0.00% 8.00 8.00
18.3 for each child fourteen years of age or under, per
day. 0.63 0.55 7.82 9.00 9.00 0.00% 9.00 9.00
18.4 for each child fourteen years of age or under, per
day, after 1:00 p.m. 0.45 0.40 5.65 6.50 6.50 0.00% 6.50 6.50
18.5 for each person in a group with a reservation,
including trail fees, per day. 0.45 0.40 5.65 6.50 6.00 8.33% 6.00 6.00 Increase related to trail fee component of package.
19.0 For a guided tour at Bruce's Mill during the maple syrup
program, for each person in a group with a reservation. 0.00 0.16 2.34 2.50 2.50 0.00% 2.40 2.40 Current market limit.
* DRAFT current to October 28, 1993 please recycle previous versions of this docuutenu
Black Creek Pioneer Village
general admission, off- season admission, citizenship, corporate citizenship
Item description
PST
8%
GST
7%
1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
Base Gross fee increase fee fee
20.0 For general admission to the Black Creek Pioneer
Village, during the regular operating season, per day;
20.1 for each adult from fifteen to sixty -four years of
age.
- 20.2 for each child from five to fourteen years of age.
20.3 for each child four years of age or under
accompanying their family.
20.4 for each child four years of age or under visiting as
part of an organized group under supervision.
20.5 for each senior sixty -five years of age or over.
20.6 for each student fifteen years of age or over, with
student identification.
20.7 for each student participating in a general tour
program.
20.8
for each student participating in a specially
designated tour program.
20.9 for each student participating in a designated activity
program, including Many Hands and Tour and
Touch.
20.10 for each student participating in the Dickson Hill
School program, per day, subject to a minimum
group size of twenty persons.
0.00 0.49 7.01 7.50 7.00 7.14%
0.00 0.21 3.04 3.25 3.00 8.33%
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.15 2.10 2.25 2.25 0.00 %
0.00 0.33 4.67 5.00 4.50 11.11 %
0.00 0.33 4.67 5.00
0.00 0.31 4.44 4.75 4.60
0.00 0.39 5.56 5.95 5.75
0.00 0.59 8.41 9.00 9.00
0.00 0.26 3.74 4.00 4.00
* DRAFT current to October 28, 1993 • please recycle previous versions of this document
7.00
3.00
0.00 0.00
6.25 to other Toronto attractions. Target promotion to
2.75 increase attendance nets $22,000 additional revenue.
No change for 2 years. Rates are mid -range compared
2.25
4.50
2.00
4.00
Re- introduction of fee item. Reflects demand noted on
NA comment cards. Targeted promo nets - $12,000.
3.26% 4.50
3.48% 5.75 5.50
0.00% 8.90 8.50
0.00% 4.00 3.75
Group rate increases to he effective September 1994 to
coincide with school year calendar.
No change. Activity at market limit.
Black Creek Pioneer Village
general admission, off- season admission, citizenship, corporate citizenship
Item description
PST GST 1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
8% 7% Base Gross fee increase fee fee
21.0 For an annual citizenship valid for general admission to
the Black Creek Pioneer Village;
21.1 for a family of one or two adults and their children
who are fourteen years of age or under. 0.00 2.94 42.06 45.00 40.00 12.50% 40.00 45.00
21.2 for each adult from fifteen to sixty -four years of
age. 0.00 1.96 28.04 30.00 30.00 0.00% 30.00 30.00
21.3 for each senior sixty -five years of age or over. 0.00 1.64 23.36 25.00 25.00 0.00% 25.00 25.00
21.4 for a couple sixty -five years of age or over. 0.00 2.29 32.71 35.00 35.00 0.00% 35.00 35.00
21.5 for a corporate citizenship. 0.00 0.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 NA
22.0 For the after -hours use of Black Creek Pioneer Village,
including staffing, commencing within one -half hour of
normal closing time and subject to a three -and -one -half
hour maximum;
22.1 for the use of the Village grounds only from May to
September.
22.2 for the use of the Village grounds only from
October to April.
22.3 including the use of three buildings.
22.4 including the use of four buildings.
22.5 including the use of six buildings.
22.6 including the use of eight buildings.
0.00 24.50 350.00 374.50 374.50
0.00 31.50 450.00 481.50 481.50
0.00 90.65 1295.00 1385.65 1385.65
0.00 111.65 1595.00 1706.65 1706.65
0.00 132.65 1895.00 2027.65 2027.65
0.00 153.65 2195.00 2348.65 2348.65
* DRAFT • current to October 28. 1993 • please recycle previous versions of this document
374.50 NA
481.50 NA
1385.65 NA
1706.65 NA
2027.65 NA
2348.65 NA
Rate reflects day visit increase family pass - 2+ visits
for 2 adults & 2 children. Anticipate $2,250 additional
revenue based on promotion.
Black Creek Pioneer Village
general admission, off - season admission, citizenship, corporate citizenship
Item description
PST GST 1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
8% 7% Base Gross fee increase fee fee
23.0 For a horse -drawn wagon or sleigh ride at the Black
Creek Pioneer Village;
23.1 for a group with a reservation during regular
operating hours, per half -hour.
23.2 in conjunction with an after -hours function as
identified in item 22.0, with completion of wagon
rides within 90 minutes of regular closing time, for
Time block of 30 minutes reflects more affordable time
0.00 3.27 46.73 50.00 120.00 -58.33% 120.00 100.00 frame for activity.
one wagon. 0.00 12.25 175.00 187.25 NA
23.3 as specified in itertl 23.2, for two wagons. 0.00 22.75 325.00 347.75 NA
23.4 items 23.2 and 23.3 subject to a late charge of
$50.00 per half -hour per wagon; gross charges not
to exceed a maximum of $500.00 0.00 3.27 46.73 50.00 NA
23.5 in conjunction with an after -hours function as
identified in item 22.0. for rides scheduled more
than 90 minutes after regular closing. 0.00 35.00 500.00 535.00 535.00
535.00 NA
24.0 At the Black Creek Pioneer Village, in conjunction with
a wedding;
24.1 for the use of any one location, including the
rehearsal. 0.00 22.90 327.10 350.00 350.00 0.00% 350.00 300.00
24.2 for the use of a horse and vehicle. 0.00 20.33 254.67 275.00 275.00 0.00% 350.00 200.00
* DRAFT • current to October 28, 1993 • please recycle previous versions of this document
New rate structure is designed to encourage groups to
include This additional activity at the beginning of their
program.
Black Creek Pioneer Village
general admission, off - season admission, citizenship, corporate citizenship
Item description
PST GST 1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
8% 7% Base Gross fee increase fee fee
25.0 For commercial photography or filming in the Black
Creek Pioneer Village, including supervision, per hour;
25.1 for the use of grounds and environs, during the
period from 8:30 a.m. until midnight.
25.2 for the use of grounds and environs, during the
period from midnight until 8:30 a.m.
25.3 for the use of the interior of huildings, during the
period from 8:30 a.m. until midnight.
25.4 for the use of the interior of buildings, during the
period from midnight until 8:30 a.m.
0.00 6.54 93.46 100.00 100.00 0.00% 100.00 100.00
0.00 11.45 163.55 175.00 175.00 0.00% 175.00 175.00
0.00 8.18 116.82 125.00 125.00 0.00% 125.00 125.00
0.00 11.45 163.55 175.00 175.00 0.00% 175.00 175.00
26.0 For a guided tour at the Black Creek Pioneer Village, as
part of a tour group with a reservation;
26.1 for each adult from fifteen to sixty -four years of
age. 0.00 0.59 8.41 9.00 8.60 4.65% 8.60 8.25
26.2 for each senior sixty -five years of age or over. 0.00 0.43 6.07 6.50 6.50 0.00% 6.50 6.25
* DRAFT • current to October 28, 1993 • please recyck previous versions of this document
Kortright Centre for Conservation
general admission, annual membership
Item description
PST GST 1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
8% 7% Base Gross fee increase fee fee
27.0 For general admission at the Kortright Centre for
Conservation;
27.1 for each adult from fifteen to sixty -four years of
age. •
0.00 0.28 3.97 4.25 4.00 6.25% 4.00 4.00 No change for 3 years. Increase revenue - $12000.
27.2 for each child from five to fourteen years of age. 0.00 0.16 2.34 2.50 2.25 11.11% 2.25 2.00
27.3 for each child four years of age or under
accompanying their family. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
27.4 for each child four years of age or under visiting as
part of an organized group under supervision. 0.00 0.11 1.64 1.75 1.75 0.00% 1.75 1.75
27.5 for each senior sixty -five years of age or over. 0.00 0.16 2.34 2.50 2.25 11.11 % 2.25 2.00
27.6 for each student participating in a general tour Group rate changes effective Sept. 1994. Better fit with
program. 0.00 0.21 3.04 3.25 3.15 3.17% 3.10 2.95 school year planning.
27.7 for each student participating in a specially
designated tour program. 0.00 0.27 3.88 4.15 4.05 2.47% 3.95 3.75
28.0 For an annual membership valid for general admission to
the Kortright Centre for Conservation;
28.1 for a family of one or two adults and their children
who are fourteen years of age or under, or who are
students with a student card.
28.2 for each adult from fifteen to sixty -four years of
age.
28.3
for each senior sixty -five years of age or over.
28.4 for a couple sixty -five years of age or over.
0.00 3.21 45.79 49.00 49.00 0.00% 49.00 47.00 No change. Family rate • 3.5 visits for 2 adults & 2
children. Provides good balance with BCPV and CA
0.00 2.36 33.64 36.00 36.00 0.00% 36.00 35.00 Annual rates.
0.00 2.09 29.91 32.00 32.00 0.00% 32.00 30.00
0.00 2.68 38.32 41.00 41.00 0.00% 41.00 40.00
* DRAFT • current w October 28, 1993 • please recycle previous versions of this document
Kortright Centre for Conservation
guided tours
Item description
PST GST 1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
8% 7% Base Gross fee increase fee fee
29.0 For a guided tour at the Kortright Centre for
Conservation, as part of a tour group with a reservation;
29.1 for each adult from fifteen to sixty -four years of
age. 0.00 0.43 6.07 6.50 6.50 0.00% 6.50 6.25
29.2 for each senior sixty -five years of age or over.
Misc.
iscellaneous programs
0.00 0.32 4.63 4.95 4.95 0.00% 4.95 4.95
Albion Hills Farm
Item description
PST GST 1994 1994 1993 Percent 1992 1991
8% 7% Base Gross fee increase fee fee
30.0 For a farm tour at the Albion Hills Farm, per person;
30.1 for intermediate, senior or college level students
subject to a minimum charge of $60.00 and a
maximum group size of forty persons. 0.00 0.26 3.69 3.95 3.95 0.00% 3.95 3.75
30.2 for primary or junior level students subject to a
minimum charge of $35.00 and a maximum group
size of forty persons. 0.00 0.13 1.87 2.00 2.00 0.00% 2.00 2.00
Discounts
The following discounts apply to the above fee schedule;
DI At all Conservation Areas, from the end of winter activities to the opening of the trout season (February-March '?'? to April 24, 1994), general admission fees will not be collected. All other facility /program fees remain in
effect. Designated special events are excepted.
D2 At all Conservation Areas, from the Tuesday following Thanksgiving Day to the commencement of winter activities (October 11 to December- January 1994 /95), general admission fees will not be collected. All other
facility /program fees remain in effect. Designated special events are excepted.
D3 At Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Kortright Centre, twenty percent (20 %) off regular per person admission fees, subject to a minimum group size of twenty persons, exclusive of guided tour programs.
* DRAFT current to October 28, 1993 • please recycle previous versions of this document
CK27/?3
THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR WATER BASED ACTIVITIES
Revised January 31, 1994
C .2g/9 3
POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR WATER BASED ACTIVITIES
PURPOSE
This policy outlines standards and operational procedures for water based activities taking place on lands
owned and managed by the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. These activities
include swimming and boating on the part of the general public, schools, day camps or other groups, or
as carried out as part of a Conservation Field Centre Program.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
The procedures outlined in this document which apply to Conservation Field Centres are to be identified
as part of the pre -plan for a visit.
The sections which apply to organized groups and school field trips are to be identified as conditions for
obtaining a permit for any organized group outing.
Procedures for Field Centre use apply to facilities operated by the Authority and to facilities managed and
maintained by other municipal agencies.
a ie a9 /q 3
RESIDENTIAL CONSERVATION FIELD CENTRE
WATER SAFETY PROCEDURES
1. RECREATIONAL SWIMMING ACTIVITIES
Swimming activities shall be permitted only in Conservation Areas designated for public swimming,
or at approved municipal public beaches, and shall be subject to the regulations outlined in
"Swimming Policy for Residential Field Centre Programs, Recognized School Field Trips and
Organized Groups ".
2. PARENTAL CONSENT FORM
No student may participate in any water -based activity unless his or her parent /guardian has signed
a consent form indicating which activities have been approved, and indicating the student's swimming
ability.
3. SWIMMING PREREQUISITES
Swim tests or proof of swimming ability will be required for all students participating in canoe and row
boat programs, but are not required for the pontoon boat.
Exceptions will be made for "special needs" non - swimmers with recognized disabilities such as mental
and physical handicaps, to participate in all small craft activities to the best of their ability, without
meeting the required swimming ability prerequisite.
4. STAFFING
All water -based activities require the presence of a lifeguard with a minimum Bronze Cross
qualification, current to two years.
The maximum ratio of students to adult staff is 10:1.
All staff supervising water -based activities or teaching lake programs are to be familiar with the
recognition and treatment of hypothermia, use of personal flotation devices, H.E.L.P. (Heat Exchange
Lessening Position), artificial respiration, the use of rescue equipment, correct procedure for entering
and leaving a boat, for approaching and leaving a dock, and must be fully aware of the Field Centre
rescue procedures.
Canoe instructors must hold a minimum ORCA Lakewater 1 qualification, and be familiar with canoe
rescue procedures (e.g., canoe - over - canoe).
5. SAFETY INSTRUCTION
All students participating in pontoon boat and small craft activities shall be instructed in and shall
obey the safety procedure appropriate to the activity. Failure to obey shall result in removal from the
activity.
6. LIFE JACKETS
All students and staff MUST WEAR a personal flotation device at all times while on the pontoon boat,
in canoes, or row boats, and on the dock if they are beyond the yellow line. Failure to obey shall
result in removal from the dock area.
CR 30 /q3
7. APPROVED CRAFT
The only craft approved for student use during lake activities at Lake St. George are the pontoon craft,
fibreglass canoes (minimum 16' [approx. 5m]) and row boats of 850 lbs. (382.5 kg) capacity M.O.T.
approved.
8. RESCUE PROCEDURES
A rescue craft must be on the water whenever students are participating in lake studies requiring
boats or canoes. Students accidentally entering the water will be picked up by the rescue craft,
transported to shore and taken to the Field Centre for further treatment and dry clothing.
All recommendations for further treatment made by the lifeguard, or trained First Aiders on staff must
be followed by visiting teachers /leaders and students.
The craft containing the qualified lifeguard shall be deemed to be the "Rescue Craft", and except for
canoe programs, the craft shall be appropriately motorized and equipped as required by government
regulations, plus it shall carry a throwing rescue device, a reaching assist, a First Aid kit, and blankets.
9. DOCK AREA SAFETY PRACTICES
Boats not being used for instruction must be locked.
The dock area is to be roped off with a "CLOSED" sign at the end of the boating season.
The dock area is to be equipped year round with a reaching assist and throwing device.
10. CRAFT USE RESTRICTIONS
No row boats, canoes or the pontoon boat shall be used after dark, during electrical storms, or if the
water is choppy due to high winds, such conditions to be determined at the discretion of the
Supervisor.
No row boats or canoes shall be on the water if the water temperature is below 8 °C.
11. STUDY SITES
Any area designated as a "study site must be in full view of the staff member supervising the activity.
12. SAFE BEHAVIOUR
Misuse of safety equipment, unsafe or foolish behaviour by participants in water -based activities will
result in their dismissal by the supervisor or designate.
13. CANOE SAFETY
The maximum loading for any 16' (5m) canoe is 3 persons.
Each canoe shall be equipped with a bailer, whistle and paddles.
14. WINTER USE
It is the responsibility of the Field Centre supervisor or designate to determine that the ice is not less
than 10 cm (4 ") thick, and in a safe condition before allowing students on the surface.
The drilling of holes must be supervised by Centre staff and must be backfilled and clearly marked.
A rescue toboggan shall be available at all times, and shall be equipped with cushions, straps, and
a blanket.
An extension ladder and /or a row boat shall be available at the lakefront throughout the winter season
for over the ice rescues.
C231 /c73
SWIMMING POLICY FOR RESIDENTIAL FIELD CENTRE PROGRAMS
RECOGNIZED SCHOOL FIELD TRIPS AND ORGANIZED GROUPS
1. DESIGNATED SWIMMING AREAS
The Authority designates the following to be approved areas for Conservation Education Program
recreational swimming:
Albion Hills Conservation Area
Bruce's Mill Conservation Area
Heart Lake Conservation Area
Lake Wilcox Public Beach
Petticoat Creek Conservation Area
2. SWIMMING PREREQUISITES
a) Non - swimmers will not be allowed to participate in recreational swimming activities, but will be
permitted to participate in beginner swimming instruction classes, with parental or guardian
consent.
b) Exceptions will be made for "special needs" non - swimmers with recognized disabilities, such as
physical or mental handicaps, to participate to the best of their ability in approved swimming
activities.
c) It is the responsibility of the visiting teacher(s) or group leader(s) to supply the Field Centre
supervisor with a form signed by the student's parent or guardian, indicating the student's
swimming ability and giving approval for the student to participate in the activity.
3. STAFFING
a) Groups from Field Centres, recognized school field trips or organized groups using public
swimming areas with a qualified lifeguard present, must provide the additional supervision of one
adult to ten students. Those supervising swimming must be in a swimsuit and shall be at
designated locations observing students at all times and shall take direction from the qualified
lifeguard.
b) If the group consists of more than 20 up to a maximum of 50 students IN THE WATER AT THE SAME
TIME, a second qualified lifeguard must be on duty.
4. SAFETY PRACTICES
Students shall receive a pre- swimming drill on water safety practices that includes:
a) role and responsibility of supervisory staff and students;
b) boundaries of swimming area;
c) procedures in an emergency situation related to the area being utilized.
C R 3ah8
The policy and procedures of the buddy system are:
a) buddy system is mandatory;
b) only two in each group of buddies;
c) each buddy must know where partner is at all times.
On arrival at swimming area:
a) the pre- swimming drill will be repeated;
b) the purpose and procedures for regular whistle checks, as justified by the conditions, will be
explained;
c) details of the swimming area and any unique features of the area, to be pointed out to the
student.
Failure to comply with any of the water safety practices shall result in automatic removal from the
swimming area.
5. EQUIPMENT
All designated areas approved for recreational swimming shall be equipped with rescue, First Aid and
communication equipment as determined by the supervisor or designate, according to the site
conditions of the facility.
C233 At
PUBLIC BOATING IN CONSERVATION AREAS
1. DESIGNATED AREAS
Boating will be permitted only at designated Conservation Areas. Other than by a special permit, the
use of privately owned non - motorized water craft is permitted only at Heart Lake Conservation Area.
Boating rules also apply to the Authority boat rental operations at Glen Haffy Extension and Heart
Lake Conservation Area.
2. BOATING RULES
a) Life jackets or personal floatation devices must be worn by all persons while on the water.
b) No diving or swimming from any water craft.
c) All boaters must stay within the designated area.
d) Rubber rafts or other inflatable boats are prohibited.
e) No motorized boats are allowed.
f) Persons renting equipment must be 18 years of age or older.
g) Persons under 18 years of age renting equipment must be accompanied by a responsible
adult.
h) No "horseplay' in any water craft.
i) A maximum of three persons is permitted per canoe.
j) Persons renting Authority equipment must sign the release on the rental form.
Failure to comply with boating rules shall result in cancellation of boating privileges.
PUBLIC SWIMMING IN CONSERVATION AREAS
1. DESIGNATED SWIMMING AREAS
The Authority designates the following to be approved areas for public swimming:
Albion Hills Conservation Area
Bruce's Mill Conservation Area
Heart Lake Conservation Area
Petticoat Creek Conservation Area
2. OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
The swimming areas at Albion Hills, Heart Lake and Bruce's Mill Conservation Areas will be used only
when all necessary lifesaving equipment, emergency telephones and signs are in place.
3. SWIMMING AREA RULES
a) Inflatable objects other than rafts dinghies and inner tubes are permitted up to the first buoy
line at Albion Hills, Bruce's Mill and Heart Lake.
b) No inflatable objects are permitted at Petticoat Creek Conservation Area.
c) Approved personal floatation devices and small vessel lifejackets may be used by swimmers
when properly worn and fastened.
d) Organized groups may use styrofoam flutter boards as instructional aids.
e) Cats, dogs or other domestic pets are not allowed in the swimming area or on the beach.
f) Food, drinks and glass objects are not permitted on the beach or in the water.
g) The use of snorkels or other artificial breathing aids is not permitted except by permits.
h) Weak swimmers and non - swimmers must remain in shallow water.
i) Swimmers must stay off the buoy line.
j) Parents and guardians must keep a close watch on children at all times and are fully
responsible for children under their care.
k) Throwing rocks or sand is not permitted.
I) Water craft are not permitted in the swimming area and boats may be launched only from
the area designated for launching.
m) The use of fishing rods is not permitted in and around the swimming area.
n) Only lifeguards are permitted on the guard chairs