Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board 1992 ~ 'M:>rking Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace 'the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes E-1 APRIL 3, 1992 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #1/92 The Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board met at Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitors Centre on Friday, April 3, 1992. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 11 :50 a.m. PRESENT Chair Lorna Jackson Vice Chair Marie Muir Members Howard Moscoe Paul Palleschi Donna Patterson Deborah Sword Vice Chair of the Authority Lois Hancey ABSENT Members Margaret Britnell Mike Colle Gerri Lynn O'Connor Richard Whitehead MINUTES Res. #1 Moved by: Howard Moscoe Seconded by: Marie Muir THAT the Minutes of Meeting 115/91 be approved. CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE (a) Letter from Don Vale, Vice President, Colley, Borland & Vale, Insurance Brokers Ltd., dated 24.03.92, re: Horseback riding on Authority Property (b) Letter from Allison Reynolds, Morris Studios and Associates Inc., dated received 01.04.92, re: Horseback Riding on Authority Property (c) Letter from Ontario Trail Riders Association, Inc. dated 23.03.92, re: Draft Policy on Horseback Riding on Authority Property (d) Letter from Barbara Winterstein, dated 22.03.92, re: Horseback riding on Authority Property E-2 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #1/92, APRIL 3,1992 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. AMENDMENT TO AUTHORITY FEE SCHEDULE -Albion Hills Campground KEY ISSUE Hydro service has been installed at the Albion Hills Campground at eleven sites. An amendment to the Authority Fee Schedule is required to incorporate charges for these serviced sites. Res. #2 Moved by: Howard Moscoe Seconded by: Donna Patterson THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Authority Fee Schedule be amended to reed: 11.0 For a permit to occupy an Individual serviced campsite, hook-ups, inclusive of general admission, per day; 11.1 at Indian Line, with hydro and water hookups, per night. . 17.00 11.2 at Indian Line, with hydro and water hookups, per season. . 1,700.00 11.3 at Albion Hills, with hydro hookups, per night. . 16.00 CARRIED BACKGROUND The Authority's 1992 Fee Schedule was approved at Authority Meeting #7/91, held October 18, 1991. Since that time, hydro service has been installed at eleven campsites at the Albion Hills Campground. At Indian Line Campground, a premium has always been charged for serviced sites. In order to accommodate this at Albion Hills, an amendment to the Fee Schedule is required prior to the 1992 camping season. 2. HORSEBACK RIDING ON AUTHORITY PROPERTY KEY ISSUE The establishment of a pOlicy regarding horseback riding on Authority property in order to clarify existing practice and comply with Ontario Regulation 593/88. Res. #3 Moved by: Lois Hancey Seconded by: Howard Moscoe THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the following policy related to horseback riding on Authority property be adopted: (1 ) Horseback riding on Conservation Authority lands is by permit only as per Ontario Regulation 593/88; --- -- CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #1/92, APRIL 3,1992 E-3 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. HORSEBACK RIDING ON AUTHORITY PROPERTY (CONTD.) (2) Riding Is permitted on Authority lands except for active use Conservation Areas and other sites as designated. Any equestrian usa will be subject to applicable municipal by-laws and management agreements with municipalities and other agencies. Properties where riding is generally restricted Include those known as Glen Hafty (main erea), Albion Hills, Cold Creek, KortrIght. Boyd, Clalreville, Ebeneezer, Heart Lake, Bruce's Mill, Greenwood, Petticoat Creek and Palgrave (during the ski season); (3) Permits ere to be available upon request through the Conservation Areas Section subject to proof of Dability Insurance coverage on horse and rider of a minimum of .1 million. A fee may be cherged for the permit with the permit being renewable on a yeerly basis. Permits ere non-transferrable and must be carried by riders when on Authority property; (4) Access to Authority property must be by an approved access point as signified by a permissive sign. Riders entering by eny other access point are in contravention of Ontario Regulation 593/88; . (5) Commercial riding operations ere not permitted on Authority property except by agreement as approved by the Authority; (6) Competitions or special events require a separate permit and would Involve such terms and conditions as mutually agreed upon; (7) The Authority reserves the right to restrict access to properties or parts of properties deemed to be environmentally sensitive either permanently or for certain time periods; (8) A permit may be revoked by the Authority at any time; THAT a permit fee of .10.00 be charged for 1992; AND FURTHER THAT staff review the policy at the end of one year and rep,ort back to the Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board at that time. AMENDMENT Moved by: Howard Moscoe Res. #4 Seconded by: Deborah Sword THAT the horseback rider be permitted with a clearly visible identifying symbol appearing on the horses heed gear. AND FURTHER THAT staff develop a pemphlet to be distributed to riders upon permit epplication, stating Authority policy govemlng horseback riding on Authority lands. THE AMENDMENT WAS ................................................... CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED E-4 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #1/92. APRIL 3,1992 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. HORSEBACK RIDING ON AUTHORITY PROPERTY ICONTD.) BACKGROUND Ontario Regulation 593/88 made under the Conservation Authorities Act governs The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Areas. The regulation states, in part: "10.(1) No person shall bring an animal other than a dog or a cat into the Conservation Area except under a permit issued by the Authority..... (4) No person shall ride or lead a horse or similar animal in the Conservation Area, except on a highway or other place designated by the Authority, or leave a horse or similar animal in a location where it is likely to cause danger or .inconvenience to other persons." Pursuant to these sections of the regulation, riding has not been permitted on Authority property except by permit for special events. In practice however, a great deal of unauthorized riding has occurred on an informal basis, primarily on the Authority's undeveloped lands. Because of the Authority's limited capacity for patrol and enforcement on these lands and in part due to the lack of an explicitly stated policy, this type of use has gone unchallenged. In recent years, patrol and enforcement activities on Authority lands have been increased partially in response to the concerns of local residents. In the course of patrol activities, field staff has made riders aware of Authority regulations. In addition, changes in the way Authority properties are signed implemented in the Autumn of 1 991 created the perception amongst some riders that the Authority had recently decided to arbitrarily prohibit riding on its lands. This combination of circumstance~ has led to the raising of public concern on the part of various riding groups and individual riders. In response to the concerns expressed and in an effort to provide clear guidelines for Authority field staff, a policy has been developed in cOl)sultation with the various Authority sections involved. This policy has been reviewed in a preliminary way with representatives of the riding community. Written response is listed under Correspondence of Conservation and Related Land Management Minutes #1/92. In addition, three verbal responses were received by staff. These were in general positive dependent upon final administration of the permit system. The permit fee was felt to be reasonable and there was little concern with the requirement for insurance. RATIONALE A clear policy regarding horseback riding is required in order to provide guidance for field staff. While there are Authority lands where riding is inappropriate, there are properties where there is no reason why riding should not be permitted. The use of a permit system will provide information to staff as to where riding is taking place and the number of riders involved. This will assist in determining the impact of this activity and will allow the Authority to control risk through provisions for liability insurance and a signed agreement. FINANCIAL DETAILS It is anticipated that the charging of a $10.00 permit fee will cover incremental administrative costs. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Once approved, the policy will be circulated to riders and riding groups for information. Problems or concerns will be monitored over the coming year and any necessary changes will be incorporated in the review to be carried out next year. CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #1/92, APRIL 3,1992 E-5 NEW BUSINESS MOUNTAIN BIKES Res. #5 Moved by: Marie Muir Seconded by: Howard Moscoe THAT staff examine the Issue of the use of mountain bikes on Authority lands, Including the granting of permits, leval of currant/potential activity, potential damage caused by bike riders, provision of slgnage and groomed trail. fOt bike riders, and report back to the Conservation and Related Land Management Board. CARRIED TERMINATION The meeting terminated at 12:30, April 3, 1992. . Lorna Jackson J.D. Aanew Chair Director, Field Operations /bb . ~ 'Norking Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace "the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes E-6 JUNE 5, 1992 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #2/92 The Conservation and Related Land Managernent Advisory Board rnet at Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitors Centre on Friday, June 5, 1992. The Chair called the meeting to order at 9:07 a.m. PRESENT .... Chair Lorna Jackson Vice Chair Marie Muir r" .:~ Members Margaret Britnell .r'~. Paul Palleschi Donna Patterson Deborah Sword Richard Whitehead Vice Chair of the Authority Lois Hancey ABSENT Members Mike Colle Howard Moscoe Gerri Lynn O'Connor MINUTES Res. #6 Moved by: Paul Palleschi Seconded by: Donna Patterson THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1192 be approved. CARRIED E-7 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD 12/92, JUNE 5, 1992 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE -Amendment to Authority Fee Schedule KEY ISSUE Revision and reduction of fees for after-hours use of Black Creek Pioneer Village to reflect lower labour costs. Res. #7 Moved by: Marie Muir Seconded by: Donna Patterson THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Authority Fee Schedule, Item 33.0, be amended to read: ITEM DESCRIPTION PST GST 1992 1992 8% 7% ' BASE GROSS 33.0 For the after-hours use of Black Creek Pioneer Village, including staffing, commencing within one-half hour of normal closing time and subject to a three-and-one-half hour maximum; 33.1 for the use of the Village grounds 0.00 24.50 350.00 374.50 only from May to September. 33.2 for the use of the Village grounds 0.00 31.50 450.00 481.50 only from October to April. 33.3 Including the use of three 0.00 90.65 1295.00 1385.65 buildings. 33.4 including the use of four buildings. 0.00 111.65 1595.00 1706.65 33,5 including the use of six buildings. 0.00 132,65 1895.00 2027.65 33.6 including the use of eight 0.00 153.65 2195.00 2348.65 buildings. CARRIED BACKGROUND The labour component for after-hours rental of BCPV was projected at a higher rate than the actual 2% increase approved in March, 1992. The fees for after-hours use (Item 33.0) have been reviewed, and adjustment is recommended to incorporate actual wage costs and price after-hours use more attractively in a recessionary market. BCPV has heightened its sales and marketing efforts to increase use of the facility after- hours. Overall, companies are looking for exceptional value and low prices. This pricing reduction makes the facility more affordable and still profitable. FINANCIAL DETAILS The recommended changes in fee schedule would be a $1 00 reduction in base price for the three packages involving use of buildings, and a $45 reduction in base price for the two packages involving use of grounds only. Corresponding reduction occurs in GST. Furthermore, a new category for use of three buildings is recommended to suit the limited budgets of many companies and smaller private groups. The use of three buildings is designed and priced to attract groups that wish to see a limited amount of the Village, but have budgets of $2,500 to $4000 to host their complete event (Village plus food). CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #2/92, JUNE 5,1992 E-B SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE -Appointment of Honourary Reeve KEY ISSUE Appointment of Mr. Fred Napoli as Honourary Reeve of Black Creek Pioneer Village for a one year term commencing July 1, 1992. , Res. #8 Moved by: Margaret Britnell Seconded by: Lois Hancey THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT Mr. Fred Napoli, host of the C.F.R.B. program "Owls Nest" be appointed to serve a. Honourary Reeve of Black Creek Pioneer Village for a one year term commencing July 1, 1992. CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Black Creek Pioneer Village July 1 st Militia Muster and Canada Day celebration, it has become a tradition to appoint an Honourary Reeve for the ensuing year. Mr. Fred Napoli has had a distinguished 30 year career as a radio broadcaster and has a long-standing interest in Ontario's heritage. He is the author of the book Reinventina Mvself, and his voice is well-known from the many radio and television commercials he has recorded. Mr. Napoli will succeed Mr. Glen Cochrane, of C.F.T.O., who has served as Honourary Reeve for the past two years. 3. 1992 CONSERVATION AREAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT - Program and Funding Adjustments KEY ISSUE Program and funding adjustments for the 1992 Planning and Development Program. Res. #9 Moved by: Paul Palleschi Seconded by: Donna Patterson THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the changes to the Planning and Development program, dated June 5, 1992, Table 1, be approved; AND THAT staff be authorized and directed to implement the 1992 Planning and Development Program as amen,ded. CARRIED BACKGROUND The funding of the Claireville Conservation Field Centre leased to the Etobicoke Board of Education was to be entirely funded from revenues. A portion of the funding shown in the budget as municipal levy ($45,000) was an error and should have been derived from revenues. These funds were to be used for upgrading the Public Use facilities as outlined in the Conservation Areas Development Project 1991-1995. The municipal levy of $45,000 is required for improvements to the picnic facilities and to fund the completion of the Concept Plan for the Kortright Centre for Conservation. The amended budget and projects for the Planning and Development program follow in Table 1. E-9 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #2/92, JUNE 5, 1992 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 3. 1992 CONSERVATION AREAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ICONTD.) - Program and Funding Adjustments FINANCIAL DETAILS There is no change in levy or provincial grant as a result of the amendments. A transfer of revenue from the Recreation, Restoration and Development Reserve in the amount of $45,000 is required. The transfer from the Reserve will be presented to the Authority for approval as part of the year-end financial statements. . TABLE I Revised Project List for 1992 PROJECT Gross Grant Mun. Other Levy C.A. Gen. Development $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 - Trail Development Planning & Maps $143,000 - $143,000 · Claireville Interpretive Centre $264,000 - $264,000 Claireville Campground $60,000 - $30,000 $30,000 · Picnic Improvements $160,000 $80,000 $80,000 Kortright Centre Trail & Pond $80,000 $40,000 $40,000 Black Creek Con. Area Workshop $60,000 - $30,000 $30,000 Boyd/Foster Woods Trail Development $40,000 - $40,000 Conservation Foundation $100,000 - $100,000 Glen Haffy Water Supply $25,000 $12,500 $12,500 · Concept Plan Update $15,000 $7,500 $7,500 Recreation Review $2,000 - $2,000 TOTAL $1,049 .000 $50.000 $250.000 $749.000 · Funding Adjustments June 5, 1992 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #2/92, JUNE 5. 1992 E-10 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEl: CONSIDERATION 4. WILD WATER KINGDOM -Improvements to Facilities KEY ISSUE The Authority has been requested to assist Wild Water Kingdom with the paving of the parking lot. Res. #10 Moved by: Donna Patterson Seconded by: Paul Palleschi THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE EXECUTIVE THAT the paving of the parking lot at Wild Water Kingdom be approved on the basis that the work is done and funded by Wild Water Kingdom; THAT Wild Water Kingdom guarantee that the percentage rent payable to the Authority for 1992 be at least the amount of the 1991 rent; THAT the project be approved on the basis that it be a demonstration of good. storm water management; THAT the parking lot paving be financed on the basis that any excess in the percentage rent for 1992 ovar 1991 payable to the Authority would be divided on a SO/50 basis, with the Wild Water Kingdom portion being credited to the cost of the parking lot; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to give effect thereto, Including the execution of any documents. AMENDMENT Moved by: Richard Whiteheed Res. #11 Seconded by: Lois Hancey THAT the project be approved subject to full site plan approval. THE AMENDMENT WAS ......,............................................ CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CARRIED BACKGROUND The paving of the parking lot at Wild Water Kingdom was considered at the time of the original agreement but was not included in the approved plan of development. It was felt that it would add to the capital debt and debt service charge which could seriously impair the financial viability of the operation. It has become evident that dust and potholes seriously detract from the first-class nature of the park. Staff recognize Wild Water Kingdom's rationale that these improvements do not directly produce any additional revenue. The Authority has been using the revenues from Wild Water Kingdom to support the Conservation Foundation in increasing its fundraising capacity, to upgrade its Conservation Areas' facilities, and to phase in the recreation funding formula. There is need for further improvements to the Conservation Areas, Kortright Centre for Conservation and Black Creek Pioneer Village, and substantial portions of the future revenues have been committed to finance the establishment of the Greater Toronto Region Trail System. The Authority must, at least, maintain the lease revenues. The proposal from Wild Water Kingdom (Appendix CR.1/92) is reasonable and provides a guarantee of the rent while improving the park. The base rent would increase in 1992 according to the Statistics Canada all-price index, as provided for in the agreement. Staff are not recommending any commitment for assistance in 1993. Any shortfall that may occur in 1992 can be requested in 1993. E-11 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #2/92, JUNE 5,1992 TERMINATION The meeting terminated at 10:00, June 5, 1992. Lorna Jackson J.D. Aanew Chair Director, Field Operations /bb ~ Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace Vthe metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes E-12 NOVEMBER 6, 1992 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #3/92 The Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board met in the Humber Room, Head Office, Friday, November 6, 1992. The Vice-Chair, Marie Muir, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. PRESENT Vice-Chair Marie Muir Members Gerri Lynn O'Connor Donna Patterson . Deborah Sword Richard Whitehead Chair of Authority William Granger ABSENT Chair Lorna Jackson Members Margaret Britnell Mike Colle Howard Moscoe Paul Palleschi MINUTES Res. #12 Moved by: Donna Patterson Seconded by: Deborah Sword THAT the Minutes of Meeting #2/92 be approved. CARRIED DELEGA TIONS Mr. Peter Taws, President, Ontario Equestrian Federation, spoke to the Board on The Ebenezer Tract Equestrian Proposal, Claireville Conservation Area, for the Pan Am Games in 1996. ST A TUS REPORTS Tom Barber gave a status report on the Review of Authority Policies for the Public Use of Conservation Lands and the Greater Toronto Regional Trail System - Phase I. E-13 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #3/92, NOVEMBER 6, 1992 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION REVIEW OF AUTHORITY POLICIES OF THE PUBLIC USE OF CONSERVATION LANDS MOTION Moved by: Deborah Sword Res. #13 Seconded boY: William Granger THAT a special Authority meeting be held to provide input to the draft report with respect to the direction the Authority will take on the Review of Authority Policies of the Public Use of Conservation Land. CARRIED 1. THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO - Fundraising KEY ISSUE To support The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto to increase its fundraising capacity to $1.2 to $2 million per year. Res. #14 Moved by: William Granger Seconded by: Donna Patterson THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT the progress report on fundraising by The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto be received; THAT the Authority continue to support The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto to Increase its fundraising capacity for the Greenspace Plan in the order of $1.2 to $2 million per year; THAT the Authority provide in its 1993 budget estimates, up to $60,000 to provide the support costs necessary to achieve the Foundation fundraising objective; AND FURTHER THAT the support costs be funded from the Recreational Development and Restoration Reserve. AMENDMENT Moved by: William Granger Res. #15 Seconded by: Donna Patterson THA T the Annual Report of The Conservation Foundation be presented to the full Authority with emphasis on fundraising for the 1992 . 1993 year. THE AMENDMENT WAS .......................,.................,....,.... CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1989, the Authority approved the proviSion of $160,000 for 1990 to support The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto for the purpose of raising its fundraising capacity from approximately $200,000 per year to $1.2 to $2,000,000 per year. The program was designed to support The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto for a three year period, 1990, 1991, and 1992, at $160,000 per year on the condition that The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto would in its fourth year be achieving its objectives of $1.2 to $2 million per year and be self-sufficient in operations and administration costs (1993). CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD 113/92, NOVEMBER 6, 1992 E-14 SECTION I- ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF GREATER TORONTO (CONTD.1 -Fund raising The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto has made progress in upgrading its infrastructure with equipment, software, and a secretary and launched a number of new programs as reported earlier in 1990-91. It has hired a Development Director responsible for capital fundraising. The Authority requested The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto to become more active in supporting the basic resource programs of the Authority. Notable a-chievements have included: (a) supporting the acquisition of the Walker Property ($692,000); (b) activating the Tree Donation Program ($41,000 in 1991); (c) adopting the East Don River Rehabilitation Project and raising the Objective of $540,000; (d) adopting the Authority's request to support the Greater Toronto Area Trails Program to the extent of $1,000,000; . (e) adopting the request to support the Greenspace Land Acquisition and Protection Project; (f) developing a 1993 preliminary budget of approximately 3/4 of a million dollars to support Authority programs as follows: Black Creek Projects 10,000 Black Creek Growth Endowment 10,000 Doctor's Garden Endowment 1,200 Peacock Woods Endowment 250 Don River Valley 870 Bruce's Mill 1,500 Tree Donation Program 26,087 Kortright Endowment 5,000 Kortright Centre 7,000 B. Harper Bull Awards 2,500 Paul Flood Memorial 450 Trail System - Phase 1 666.667 731.524 (g) organizing the Board to achieve a number of concurrent campaigns. Campaigns for Greenway Trail and land acquisition projects have been delayed reducing the requirement in funding for 1992 to $100,000 from the $160,000 The Conservation Foundation had originally proposed. It is reasonable that the remainder of the $60,000 forecast for 1992 which was not required be allocated in 1993. Authority staff have monitored the operations and results of The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto and believe that the Foundation is making steady progress to increase its fundraising capacity and recommend that the Authority again support The Conservation Foundation in the amount of $60,000 for 1993. FINANCIAL DETAILS These funds are available from the Recreational Development and Restoration Reserve. E- 15 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #3/92, NOVEMBER 6, 1992 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. UXBRIDGE CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION - Walker Property KEY ISSUE A proposal from the Uxbridge Conservation Association to mark trails and develop a trail map alld interpretive guide for the Walker Property. Res. #16 Moved by: William Granger Seconded by: Gerrl Lynn O'Connor THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the Uxbrldge Conservation Association be authorized to mark trails at the Walker Property in consultation with Authority staff and In accordance with Authority trail guidelines; THAT staff work with the Uxbridge Conservation Association to develop a trail map and interpretive guide for the property; THA T staff investigate formal access points and parking at the Walker Property; AND FURTHER THAT the Uxbridge Conservation Association be authorized to conduct occasional guided nature walks end ski tours at the Walker Property subject to arrangement with staff and the issue of a permit by the Authority. AMENDMENT Moved by: William Granger Res. #17 Seconded by: Gerrl Lynn O'Connor THAT the Authority thank the Uxbridge Conservation Association for this initiative and valued assistance. THE AMENDMENT WAS ..............................................,.... CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARRIED BACKGROUND The Uxbridge Conservation Association was founded in 1988 as a non-profit community group with the objective of promoting the understanding of environmental issues, and the conservation and appreciation of natural resources. As part of its regular activities the Association has, in the past, used the Walker Property for hikes and guided walks under an informal arrangement with the previous owner. Staff was approached by the Uxbridge Conservation Association with a proposal to mark and map trails on the property and develOp an interpretive guide for public distribution. The Association also expressed an interest in continuing to use the lands for nature walks and other Association outings. Staff met with representatives of the Uxbridge Conservation Association and discussed planned activities in detail. It is proposed that trail mapping and marking would be carried out by Uxbridge Conservation Association volunteers and Uxbridge High School geography students. Work in the field would be under the direction of Greenwood Conservation Area Superintendent and technical assistance would be provided by the Manager, Planning and Development. The Authority would also provide base maps and other mapping as required. Development of the interpretive guide would be carried out by the Association under the leadership of a local botanist and biOlogist. Technical assistance and supplementary information would be provided by Authority staff as needed. CONSERV A TION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #3/92, NOVEMBER' 6, 1992 E-16 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. UXBRIDGE CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ICONTD.1 -Walker Property BENEFITS The work proposed by the Uxbridge Conservation Association offers an opportunity for public access to, and enJoyment of, the Walker Property to be enhanced at a minimal cost to the Authority. More import~ntly, the proposal provides a chance for community involvement in the development and management of the site. This type of partnership arrangement is consistent with the approach being taken by the Authority in managing and developing its lands elsewhere, and with the general direction suggested by the "Review of Policies of the Public Use of Conservation Lands.. The Uxbridge Conservation Association has committed itself to ongoing maintenance of any projects developed, in cooperation with Authority staff. Staff is confident that a long term relationship can be developed providing continuity and consistent maintenance standards for the site. WORK TO BE DONE The work proposed by the Uxbridge Conservation Association is likely to increase public use of the Walker Property. At present, there is no formal public access or parking at the property. In order to prevent eventual problems with parking on adjacent roads and difficulties with numerous informal access points, staff will need to investigate and develop plans for access to, and limited parking on, the property. 3. WILD WATER KINGDOM -Lease Amendments It was agreed that this item would be discussed in closed session after all agenda items had been dealt with. 4. USE OF MOUNTAIN BIKES ON AUTHORITY LANDS KEY ISSUE An examination by staff, of the issue of use of mountain bikes on Authority lands as requested by the ~onservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board. Res. #18 Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Seconded by: Deborah Sword THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the staff report on the use of mountain bikes on Authority lands be received; THAT staff consult with the Ontario Cycling Association, cycling clubs and Individuals to determine current and potential demand for mountain bike use on Authority lands, specific requirements and desired amenities associated with use, and acceptable control on activities; AND FURTHER THAT based on consultations, staff provide recommendations to the Board regarding appropriate Authority properties to be designated for mountain bike use, and regarding amenities and support services needed to accommodate such use. CARRIED E-17 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #3/92, NOVEMBER 6, 1992 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 4. USE OF MOUNTAIN BIKES ON AUTHORITY LANDS (CONTD.1 BACKGROUND During the past decade, the use of mountain bikes has increased dramatically across North America and world wide. These bicycles are designed specifically for use away from paved roads or trails, incorporating a wide range of gearing options and heavy duty frames, wheels and tires. While many mountain bike owners have found their cycles ideal for city riding, many other riders have ventured into off trail riding, either for recreation or competition. Since many Conservation Authority lands are ideal for this type of use, there has been increasing demand from the mountain bike community for access to Authority properties. At its April 23, 1992, meeting, the Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board approved Resolution #5: THAT staff examine the issue of the use of mountain bikes on Authority lands including the granting of permits, level of current/potential activity, potential damage caused by bike riders, provision of signage and groomed trails for bike riders, and report back to the Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board. Staff has looked at the issue, consulting both with field staff and other agencies to determine current and potential needs for mountain bikes access and the types of problems which might be associated with the granting of that access. Ontario Regulation 593/88 made under the Conservation Authorities Act, Section 11 (2) states that .No person shall, in the conservation area... ride a bicycle except on a roadway or other place designated by the Authority.. With reference to mountain biking, the regulation means that, while a permit is not required for the activity, it must be carried out in a designated area. The mechanism for designation is unclear. Over the past five years, permits have been issued from time to time authorizing one day mountain bike events on Authority property. These events have involved either sanctioned races or organized club tours and have taken place at Glen Major and Albion Hills. These authorizations were treated as special event permits and included provisions for insurance, confirmation of route, the use of helmets, and an option for cancellation of the event if conditions were considered wet enough that damage to Authority lands might occur. No permits have been issued for individual use. A survey of field staff over the past summer has indicated that mountain bikes are currently concentrated at several locations which are particularly suited because of terrain, vegetation and existing trail development. Exact numbers of users are difficult to asc;:ertain because much of the current activity takes place during off hours, or shoulder seasons when Area gates are not staffed. In addition, at some locations there are multiple points of access being used by mountain bikes meaning that an accurate assessment of numbers of users is difficult. From discussions with field staff, it appears that the most heavily used location at present is Albion Hills. The ski trails in place at ;the area and the challenging terrain make it an ideal location for the avid mountain biker. The popularity of the location has been assisted by the holding of two sanctioned races at the site and by some informal contact between area staff and a local club. In order to provide some context as to levels of use, the maximum number of riders which might be expected at Albion Hills on a good day is perhaps eight or ten. One or two riders per day would be a reasonable estimate for the most part. POTENTIAL PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS As noted above, the popularity of mountain biking is on the upswing. Since off-trail riding is fairly physically demanding, it is unlikely that the activity will develop the mass appeal of road riding. On the other hand, it is reasonable to assume that demand will increase, particularly at those locations which are suited to the activity and that higher levels of demand will lead to problems and conflicts which the Authority will need to control. While no problems With current levels of mountain bike use have been noted by field staff, there is some potential for concerns as use increases. These centre around two primary areas. CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #3/92, NOVEMBER 6, 1992 E-18 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 4. USE OF MOUNTAIN BIKES ON AUTHORITY LANDS (CONTD.) Depending on terrain and the rider, mountain bikes can move at a fair speed, particularly downhill. This presents a potential hazard both to the rider and to other users such as hikers. This hazard is exacerbated by the relative isolation and inaccessibility of locations where mountain bikers might ride. As traffic increases, the potential for accidents and conflicts between mountain bikers and other users becomes greater. The second area of concern involves damage to vegetation and creation of erosion problems. Experience involving current use has shown that there is potential for some damage, espeCially in wet areas and as riders venture into more challenging locations. Staff is of the opinion that both of the foregoing problems can be alleviated through controls on locations and times for mountain bike use. By restricting use to designated areas and prohibiting use when conditions may lead to damage or accident, a legitimate demand for recreation use can be met while protecting both users and the Authority's land resources. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE The Authority'S current Trail Planning and Design Guidelines do not include any provision for mountain bike use. Cycling is referred to in the document, but only in the context of the use of conventional paved or limestone screening surfaces. It is suggested therefore that staff consult with the mountain bike community to determine appropriate physical requirements and support services for use on Authority property and discuss what types of controls are needed that would be mutually acceptable. It is suggested that consultation would include the Ontario Cycling Association, cycling clubs, and interested individuals. Staff should also look at the experiences and policies of other land management agencies regarding mountain bike use. Once this consultation has been carried out guidelines for use on Authority property can be developed, designating locations and times of year for use, specifying appropriate trail configuration and marking, and outlining safety requirements and other pOlicies for use. 5. BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE -Use of Black Creek Pioneer Village as setting for Limited Edition Print Series KEY ISSUE Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) has been approached by professional artist Ronald Bayens requesting permission to create a series of paintings depicting daily life and trades of 19th century Canada. This series will be made into Limited Edition Prints, and will establish a unique, mutually beneficial relationship between this artist and BCPV. Res. #19 Moved by: GerrI Lynn O'Connor Seconded by: Deborah Sword THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to pursue discussions with Mr. Ronald Bayens and develop an agreement with Mr. Bayens for his use of Black Creek Pioneer ViRage for creating a series of paintings for the production of Limited Edition Prints. CARRIED E-19 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #3/92, NOVEMBER 6, 1992 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 5. BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE -Use of Black Creek Pioneer Village as setting for Limited Edition Print Series BACKGROUND Mr. Bayens is a young, talented artist who paints in the 19th century realism style. He apprenticed in academic figure drawing and historical technique, and works in hand-made oil paints applied in a traditional 19th century manner. With his publisher, Wilkinson Art Ltd., he has successfully issued several series of Limited Edition Prints. He has approached BCPV about painting a series set at the Village, utilizing selected Village staff at their trades/crafts. This series would be printed beginning in 1993, and would include both Limited Edition Prints (retailing for $150) and art cards (retailing for $3.50). All promotional material would include acknowledgement of Black Creek Pioneer Village, and a brief description of the trade or task depicted. Mr. Bayens would require co-ordination and access from BCPV. The Assistant Curator would co-ordinate all work with him, including access to the site, model releases, photography requirements, and provision/review of historical information. Mr. Bayens' Limited Edition Prints and other works are produced entirely with Canadian materials and labour. FUTURE BENEFITS BCPV has exceptional marketing and media opportunities through the artworks and at all promotional events/shows/sales Mr. Bayens schedules involving the series. BCPV would be able to sell the prints, artcards, and other images in the Gift Shop. For BCPV, locating high quality Canadian cards and art is a continual challenge. Commissioning works for BCPV is financially prohibitive. This work may have speCial appeal to visitors at the Village, at very affordable prices. This work is likely to be carried by many other museums, historic sites, and art galleries providing additional promotion for BCPV. BCPV has the opportunity to establish a special long-term relationship with an artist we believe has exceptional talent and promise. To give an example of another museum that has entered into this kind of relationship, in the early 1960's, ROM was generous with time and collections to Glen Loates, who has become one of Canada's leading contemporary artists. FINANCIAL DETAILS BCPV would provide Mr. Bayens access and sketching/photography time free of charge. BCPV would not ,incur any costs for the project, with the possible exception of co-hosting a special media reception to launch the series. BCPV interpreters selected as models would be accessible to Mr. Bayens during regularly scheduled work, and would sign a model release form allowing their imac;c' ,0 be used without financial compensation and without requiring future approval. SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION 6. WILD WATER KINGDOM -Improvements of Facilities It was agreed that this item would be discussed in closed session after all agenda items had been dealt with. CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #3/92, NOVEMBER 6, 1992 E-20 SECTION III - ITEMS FOR FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION ADVISORY BOARD CONSIDERATION 7. 1993 PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE KEY ISSUE Establishment of the 1993 fee structure for the public use of Authority facilities and programs. Res. #20 Moved by: Deborah Sword Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION ADVISORY BOARD THAT the 1993 Fee Schedule for admission to and the use of the Authority's facilities and programs, to become effective January 1, 1993, Appendix CR.#4/92, be approved. CARRIED BACKGROUND As part of the annual budget process, the Authority Fee Schedule for use of facilities and programs is reviewed with fees being used to calculate estimated revenues for operation programs. In recommending fees, staff review charges made by other organizations for similar facilities. As well, our Visitor Survey information indicating satisfaction with value for the dollar and general program content is taken into account. For specific programs (ie., educational tours. camping/skiing), the operating and delivery costs have been reviewed to ensure that they are fully recovered. RATIONALE Conservation Areas In 1991, per person admission fees for Conservation Areas were introduced and remained unchanged in 1992. No increase is recommended for 1993 based on the current economic climate, very low inflation rate and no Authority wage increase. The 1992 Visitor Survey value for dollar rating to mid-October indicates a high level of satisfaction (87%). Staff is of the opinion that if fees were increased. additional revenues would be more than offset by loss of attendance. The 1993 Preliminary Operating Budget has been established on the basis of no fee increase and funding is available to maintain Area operations. Item 5.0, Albion Hills Chalet Rental. has been restructured to reflect rates comparable to those charged for similar facilities in the area. At the same time. rental rates for the Bruce's Mill Chalet and Heart Lake Beach BUilding have been deleted due to lack of interest in group use for these buildings. Modest increases are being proposed in individual campsite fees at Albion Hills and Indian Line Campgrounds. Increases are based on an extended operating season at Albion Hills, general improvements at both campgrounds and maintaining a balance between Authority fees and those charged at other public and private campgrounds. In item 12.0, a new rate has been established for picnic shelters without electrical service and an increase in rates is proposed. Picnic shelter rental, in association with a group picnic, is very much in demand and in 1992 twelve additional shelters have been established in various areas through the General Development Budget. In reviewing picnic permit fees, staff also considered establishing different rates for corporate and non-profit groups. A review of: 1992 picnic permits shows that the majority would fall in the non-profit category; i.e., church, social and family groups. Even those bearing a company name are generally taken on behalf of the company's social or recreation group. Administering such a two tiered rate system would be very difficult and is unlikely to generate significant additional revenue. A small increase is proposed for Bruce's Mill Maple Syrup Program Tours in order to cover all delivery costs and provide a small net return to area operations. In reviewing 1993 Proposed Fee Schedule, items relating to ski and orienteering instruction at Albion Hills have been deleted as program staff are no longer available to support these activities. As well, all items related to Cold Creek Shooting Ranges have been deleted, reflecting the closure of these facilities in 1992. E-2l CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #3/92, NOVEMBER 6, 1992 SECTION III - ITEMS FOR FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION ADVISORY BOARD CONSIDERATION 7. 1993 PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE (CONTD.1 Black Creek Pioneer Village Admission fees were substantially increased (12%) in 1992 with the expectation that these rates would rem~in in place for 2 years. Current Village adult admission is approximately mid-range compared to other attractions (ROM, Zoo, Science Centre) in the Toronto area. The 1992 Visitors Survey indicates a high level satisfaction in the value for dollar rating (93%). Given the current economic climate, little or no inflation and no Authority wage increases, no increase in BCPV admission fees is recommended. In item 21.0, BCPV Citizenship, a new Corporate Citizenship category is proposed. This is intended to attract private sector support and increase corporate use of BCPV for day time and evening functions. A target of five Corporate Citizens hips has been established for 1993. Benefits to a company would include a pass available to employees and their immediate family, to cover admission to the Village similar to the Authority arrangements with Wild Water Kingdom. As well, a corporation would have one use of a Theatre or Banquet Room for a corporate function with no facility charge. The Corporation, for corporate gifts purchased at the Village would receive a 10% discount. Minor increases are proposed for youth and school group guided regular and Christmas tours and participation tour programs, to cover all delivery costs and to provide a net return to Village operations. In item 24.0, Weddings, a fee decrease is recommended relating to the use of a horse and vehicle as part of the wedding paCkage. Decline has been experienced in both the number of weddings and the dollars spent per wedding. This decrease is recommended in order to increase sales of this service. The proposed fee will cover incremental costs. Kortright Centre In 1992, discounted weekday adult admission fees were eliminated, reflecting a higher level of programming. As well, child and senior admissions were increased. The 1992 Visitor Surveys indicate a high level of satisfaction (87%) in the value for dollar rating. No general admission fee increase is proposed for 1993 based on the current economic climate, limited inflation and no Authority wage increases. Increased revenues received through a fee increase would be offset by loss of attendance. Minor increases are recommended for Student Tour Programs to cover delivery costs and provide a small net return for operations: . CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #3/92, NOVEMBER 6, 1992 E-22 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 8. CLAIREVILLE CONSERVATION AREA - EBENEZER TRACT EQUESTRIAN PROPOSAL KEY ISSUE ConSIdering a request from Horse Park Corporation for use of Authority lands at Claireville Conservation Area as a venue for the 1996 Pan Am Games. Res. #21 Moved by: Donna Patterson Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the Equestrian Proposal for the Claireville Conservation Area - Ebenezer Tract by Peter Taws be received; AND FURTHER THAT the proposal be considered by the Conservation and Related Land Menagement Advisory Board if it Is an acceptable facility/activity following the findings of the Review of Authority Policies for the Public Use of Conservation Lands and a revised and approved Authority strategy for the use of its lands. CARRIED . SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION CLOSED SESSION 9. WILD WATER KINGDOM -Lease Amendments Res. #22 Moved by: Donna Patterson Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor THA T Water Kingdom, lease amendments and Agenda Item 5, Wild Water Kingdom, improvements to facilities, be discussed in closed session. CARRIED The board moved to closed session. The board rose from closed session. Resolution #23, adopted by the board in closed session will be recommended to the Authority as a confidential item at its Meeting #10/92, to be held November 27, 1992. E-23 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #3/92, NOVEMBER 6, 1992 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION 10. WILD WATER KINGDOM -Improvements to Facilities KEY ISSUE To defer the 1992 Wild Water Kingdom/Authority agreement to pave the parking lot to 1993. Res. #24 Moved by: William Granger Seconded by: Gerrl Lynn O'Connor THAT Resolution #123 of executive Committee Meeting #5/92, July 10, 1992. be rescinded. AND FURTHER THAT Wild Watar Kingdom and the Authority be released from the financial obligation to pave the parking lot. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Authority is in receipt of a request from -Dr. Edward Siu Chong, President, Wild Water Kingdom as follows: "With regard to the credit for the parking lot improvements, we respectfully request that the amount of rent payable in 1992 would be as provided for in our lease. Any excess in rent payable for the 1993 season over and above the rent paid in 1991 would be split on a SO/50 basis with Wild Water Kingdom's portion being credited to the cost of the parking lot". The original request to the Authority was made in anticipation of the Park having at least as great an attendance and revenues as 1991 based on an improved facilities and a marketing program including substantial T. V. advertising. The coldest and wettest summer on record, espeCially on weekends reduced attendance from 262,067 in 1991 to 181,754 in 1992 with revenues reduced in proportion to the attendance. In view of these difficulties, as a result of external factors obviously beyond the control of Wild Water Kingdom, staff feel that the request to defer the 1992 parking lot improvement arrangements to 1993 is a fair request and should be supported by the Authority. It should be noted that the SO/50 cost sharing arrangements for 1993 are based on revenues in excess of 1991 percentage rent. FINANCIAL DETAILS The deferral guarantees the Authority the 1993 base rent and the 1991 percentage rent. TERMINA TION The meeting terminated at 11 :55, November 6, 1992. Marie Muir J. C. Mather Vice-Chair Secretary-Treasurer /bb ~ Working Together for Tomorrow's Greenspace 'the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes E-24 JANUARY 15, 1993 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #4/92 The Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board rnet in the Humber Room, Head Office, Friday, January 15, 1993. The Chair, Lorna Jackson, called the meeting to order at 10:15 a.m. PRESENT Chair Lorna Jackson Vice-Chair Marie Muir Members Donna Patterson Deborah Sword Richard Whitehead Chair of the Authority William Granger ABSENT Members Margaret Britnell Howard Moscoe Gerri Lynn O'Connor Paul Palleschi MINUTES Res. #25 Moved by: William Granger Seconded by: Donna Patterson THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/92 be approved. CARRIED E-25 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #4/92, JANUARY 15, 1993 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 1. BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE -Passport to the Past Promotion KEY ISSUE Summarizing the 1992 cross-promotion Passport to the Past, offered by Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPVI. Casa Lorna, and the Toronto Historical Board Museums. Res. #26 Moved by: Deborah Sword Seconded by: Donna Patterson THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the report on the 1992 cross-promotion. Passport to the Past, with Casa Loma and The Toronto Historical Board, be received; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to pursue other cross-promotional opportunities with Casa Lorna and the Toronto Historical Board. . CARRIED BACKGROUND Passport to the Past was a summer Joint promotion with BCPV, Casa Loma and the Toronto Historical Board Museums, which ran from July 1 through labour Day in celebration of Canada's 125 birthday. Visitors touring any of the participating heritage attractions received a passport with 2-for-1 admission discounts for the other sites. The promotion included a photo contest for children and adults, with prizes donated by 6 corporate sponsors, and the three winning entries published in the Toronto Sun. The third component of the promotion is an exhibit of 30 photographs, on display at Toronto City Hall from January 11 - January 29, 1993. The purpose of the program was to increase cross-visitation, and to help build new audiences. Because visitor profiles at the participating sites are different, the program offered visitors incentive to see a museum they might not ordinarily have planned to visit. There were 34,000 passports distributed to visitors during the promotion, with a redemption rate at a second site of 4.3%, or a total of 1,463. Black Creek Pioneer Village received over 400 parties or 28% of the total coupon redemption. We estimate this represented about 1,000 visitors. In a year when general attendance has been down 13%, this program did help improve attendance. Total cost of the promotion was $8,000, shared equally by the three sites. Total cost to MTRCA was $2,800 which was more than recovered through admission. Broad promotion through TV, radio, and print media was an added benefit that would not have been gained otherwise. The majority of redemptions at BCPV came from Casa Loma, confirming the expectation that these two sites are compatible for joint ventures. The other site with evidence of strong reciprocal viSitation is Fort York. Staff at the three organizations feel that this pilot project demonstrated there IS an audience for collaborative Initiatives, that our audience profiles are different enough to bring new audiences to each site, and that each site was able to contribute its own particular strength to the project. Staff at all three organizations agree that co-operative ventures should be considered regularly, and that simple projects in the summer periOd would be most successful. CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #4/92, JANUARY 15, 1993 E-26 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 2. BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE -Appointment of Honourary Reeve and Deputy Reeve KEY ISSUE Appointment of Fred Napoli as Honourary Reeve of Black Creek Pioneer Village for a second term, commencing July 1, 1993, and selection of a Deputy Reeve in 1993 who will serve as Honourary Reeve in 1994. Res. #27 Moved by: Deborah Sword Seconded by: Donna Patterson THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT Fred Napoli, be reappointed as Honourary Reeve of Black Creek Pioneer Village for a one year term commencing July 1, 1993; AND FURTHER THAT staff initiate the search for a Deputy Reeve who will serve as Honourary Reeve for Black Creek Pioneer Village in 1994. CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Black Creek Pioneer Village July 1 st Militia Muster and Canada Day celebration, it has become a tradition to appoint an Honourary Reeve for the ensuing year. The term of office runs for one year, but in many instances the Honourary Reeve has been reappointed for a second year. The current Honourary Reeve, Fred Napoli, was appointed to the office on July 1, 1992, for one year and has played a prominent role in Village events. To maintain continuity in this "office", it would be appropriate to reappoint Mr. Napoli for another year. It is also desirable to have a Deputy Reeve in place to succeed the Reeve in 1994. Former Honourary Reeves and Deputy Reeves have included Pauline McGibbon; Bill McNeil and Cy Strange of CBC Fresh Air; radio broadcaster and MTRCA member Bruce Smith; and John Downing of the Toronto Sun. When this matter was considered in 1992, the Conservation and Related Land Management Advisory Board expressed an interest in assisting staff to identify possible candidates. Therefore, this is brought forward at this time to permit staff to extend an invitation and bring a recommendation to the Authority for the appointment of a Deputy Reeve in the Spring. 3. MTRCA STAFF REVIEW GUIDELINES -Use of Authority Owned Lands for Storm water Management Facilities A staff presentation on the MTRCA Staff Review Guidelines was made by Renee Jarrett. Manager, Plan Review. KEY ISSUE Review guidelines for the use of Authority owned lands for storm water management facilities, have been prepared to assist staff and members in their consideration of these types of proposals. Res. #28 Moved by: Marie Muir Seconded by: William Granger THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the MTRCA Staff Review Guidelines - Use of Authority Owned Lands for Stormwater Management Facilities be received for information; E-27 CONSERV A TION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #4/92, JANUARY 15, 1993 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 3. MTRCA STAFF REVIEW GUIDELINES (CONTD.I -Use of Authority Owned Lands for Stormwater Management Facilities AND FURTHER THAT these Guidelines be used as the framework for considering present and new proposals for the use of Authority owned lands for stormwater management facilities. AMENDMENT Moved by: Marie Muir Res. #29 Seconded by: William Granger THA T the MTRCA Staff Review Guidelines - Use of Authority Owned Lands for Stormwater Management Facilities be approved. THE AMENDMENT WAS ................................................... CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CARRIED BACKGROUND The control of stormwater runoff is recognized as a necessary part of urban development. The Authority's , 980 Watershed Plan set out a program for the management of stormwater in order to meet watershed management Objectives. The use of valley and stream COrridors for the purpose of stormwater management facilities has been a topic of discussion for many years. For many practical and technical reasons, this is a logical location for them, although not all valley and stream corridor reaches are suitable for this use. The issue of locating stormwater management facilities on Authority owned lands has arisen. To date, three such proposals have been received. One of these has been approved and an easement granted, the remaining are under review. At the June 4, 1992, Staff Management Committee Meeting #10/92, it was agreed that Guidelines should be prepared to assist staff and members in the evaluation of these types of proposals. The Guidelines will also provide direction to the proponent when preparing submissions for review. The MTRCA Staff Review Guidelines. Use of Authority Owned Lands for Storm water Management Facilities was available at the meeting. The Guidelines set out the process which will ensure a thorough evaluation of proposals based on Authority program goals and objectives. The technical criteria for review of stormwater management is based on existing program goals and objectives and is consistent with the Authority's current pOlicies and practices and with the proposed Valley and St~eam Corridor Management Program. 4. KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION -Edna Gardner Forestry Trail KEY ISSUE Plan and name a Commemorative Trail, Kortright Centre for Conservation. Res. #30 Moved by: Marie Muir Seconded by: Donna Patterson THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT the plan for the Forestry Trail, Kortright Centre for Conservation, dated January 15, 1993, be approved; AND FURTHER THAT the trail be named the Edna Gardner Forestry Trail. CARRIED CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #4/92, JANUARY 15, 1993 E-28 SECTION 1- ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 4. KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION -Edna Gardner Forestry Trail BACKGROUND Mrs. J.A. Gardner was a founding member of the MTRCA serving from 1957 to 1982, and a founding member and Director of The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto serving from 1961 to 1988. She was named Director Emeritus of The Conservation Foundation after her retirement from the Board. She had, prior to the formation of the MTRCA, been a member of the Humber Valley Conservation Authority. One of her many special interests was the Kortright Centre for Conservation and its Forestry Program. Mrs. Gardner passed away in 1991 and provided in her will for a donation of $17,026 to The Conservation Foundation to be used at the Kortright Centre for Conservation in memory of her father and mother, the late Thomas and Annie Wright. Mrs. Gretchen Bauta also provided a $5,000 donation to The Conservation Foundation in memory of Mrs. Gardner. Staff propose that these donations in the amount of $22,026 be used to improve and develop the Edna Gardner Forestry Trail at the K.C.C. and to include a suitable commemorative plaque along the trail. FINANCIAL DETAILS The funding in the amount of $22,026 is available from The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto. 5. GREATER TORONTO REGION TRAIL SYSTEM - PHASE I -Financing - 1993 - Province of Ontario KEY ISSUE Financing the Provincial share of the program for the establishment of the Greater Toronto Region Trail System - Phase I. Res. #31 Moved by: Donna Patterson Seconded by: William Granger THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff request the Province of Ontario, through its Jobs Ontario Program to contribute to the funding of the program at the level as set forth in A Program for the Establishment of the Greater Toronto Region Trail System Phase I. CARRIED BACKGROUND Funding for the Greater Toronto Region Trail System - Phase I was approved by the Authority based on an estimated cost of $3,000,000.00 over a two-year period, 1993 and 1994. The 1993 Authority portion of $500,000.00 is derived from 2 sources: (i) Reserves - Recreation ($250,000) (ii) Municipal Levy ($250,000). The reserve revenue is available from lease revenues received from various projects in 1992 and previous years. The MuniCipal levy has been received or has been committed for 1993 except a portion ($17,997.00) from the Region of York. The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto has adopted the project and its share of the funding for 1993 and 1994 ($1,000,000.00). In its preliminary budget, the Conservation Foundation anticipated raising $666,667.00 in 1993 and the remainder In 1994. E-29 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #4/92, JANUARY 15, 1993 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION 5. GREATER TORONTO REGION TRAIL SYSTEM - PHASE I ICONTD.1 -Financing - 1993 - Province of Ontario Initially when the Authority adopted the Program, it requested the Ministry of Tourism and Recreation to contribute the provincial share of the program in 1993 and 1994. Since that time a "provincial freeze" on capital funding has prevented the Ministry from committing funding to the project. Staff are advised that the Waterfront Regeneration Trust are developing a project for the funding of Greenway Trails in the Greater Toronto Region through" Jobs Ontario". FINANCIAL DETAILS While Trail project funding is a high priority within the Ministry of Tourism and Recreation, the uncertainty of funds is a major concern as all 3 partners (Authority, Foundation, Province of Ontario) must approve the program in order that it can proceed. The Waterfront Regeneration Trust is proposing to request funding from Jobs Ontario on the same basis as the Ministry of Tourism and Recreation capital grant. A grant of $500,000.00 for 1993 from the Jobs Ontario Program would meet the province funding requirements for the program for 1993 (one third of the project cost) and may be the only source of provincial capital funding at this time. SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION 6. KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION -Wildcare, Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre (Ontano) -licence and Program Agreement (Renewal) A presentation was made by Ian Deslauriers, Manager, Planning and Development. KEY ISSUE To renew the agreement with Wildcare, Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre (Ontario) for the use of property and structures at the Kortright Centre for Conservation on a similar basis to the previous agreements. Res. #32 Moved by: Marie Muir Seconded by: Donna Patterson THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THAT the Authority renew a licence and program agreement with Wildcare, Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre (Ontario) to operate a wildlife rehabilitation centre at the Kortrlght Centre for Conservation. AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND On February 15, 1991, the Authority entered into a one-year agreement with Wildcare to operate a Rehabilitation Centre for native wildlife. The Authority renewed the agreement in 1992. Program Services have conducted a review of all aspects of the program with the Authority staff directly involved in the operation and wildcare representatives. The program has gone very well, exceeding expectations and has added a new dimension to the program services offered at the Kortright Centre for Conservation. CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #4/92, JANUARY 15, 1993 E-30 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION 6. KORTRIGHT CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION (CONTD.) -Wildcare, Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre (Ontario) -Licence and Program Agreement (Renewal) It is proposed that Wildcare would continue to operate on a year-to-year lease agreement out of the present temporary facility for another three years or until the program is well established. At that time, Wildcare and the Authority would consider a permanent facility and attempt to negotiate a suitable long-term agreement. FINANCIAL DETAILS The rent for 1992 was $2,000 in addition to taxes and all direct costs. It is proposed to renew the agreement for 1993 for $2,000. 7. 1993 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT KEY ISSUE Authorization of staff to proceed with the 1993 Planning and Developrnent. Res. #33 Moved by: Deborah Sword Seconded by: Donna Patterson THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THAT staff be authorized and directed to implement the 1993 Conservation Area Development Project, and The Greater Toronto Region Trail Program, as outlined in the 1993 Budget subject to budget approval of the Authority; the approval of the municipal levy and detailed plans by the member municipalities; the approval of grants from the Province of Ontario; and the confirmation of the contribution by The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto. CARRIED BACKGROUND Conservation Area Develooment 1993 is the third year of the Conservation Area Development Project - 1991-1995. The Project was approved in 1991 by the Authority and its member municipalities. While the Ministry of Natural Resources did not approve the Project in its entirety it has provided an annual grant and approved the use of grant on hand, previously approved by the Minister of Natural Resources for Conservation Area development, to match municipal levy for the general development items in the Project. The "active" recreation developments in "partnership" with others as outlined in the project have been delayed pending the results of the Recreation Review. Due to a delay in approvals of the 1992 funding and a wet fall, some of the 1992 Conservation Area development could not be completed and the following projects funded in 1992 are scheduled to be completed in 1993. . Kortright (Balcony extenSion) $ 25,000.00 . Kortright (Concept Plan) 15,000.00 . Boyd & Bruce's Mill (Composting Toilet Buildingsl 35,000.00 . Indian Line Campground (Landscapingl 27,000.00 . B.C.P.V. (Workshop) 2.000.00 TOTAL $ 104,000.00 E-31 CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #4/92, JANUARY 15, 1993 SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION 7. 1993 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT The 1993 Conservation Area Development projects include: . General Development $ 100,000.00 -Bruce's Mill washroom expansion -Boyd washroom upgrade and river crossing -Albion winter parking lot -Indian line Campground campsite improvements -Greenwood Vault Toilets -Heart Lake group campsites, landscaping, picnic tables . Albion Hills Campground improvements 60,000.00 . Petticoat Creek washroom and parking improvements 180,000.00 . Glen Hatty fishery improvements 100,000.00 . Heart Lake fencing 60,000.00 TOTAL $ 500.000.00 Other projects outlined in the preliminary budget funded by revenues from the Conservation Foundation and Recreation Reserve Revenues include the following: . follOW-Up studies related to the Recreation Review and the development of Strategies for the Public Uses of Conservation Authority Lands $ 100,000.00 . concept plans for K.C.C. and B.C.P.V. 50,000.00 . Tree Donation Program, Albion Hills, Foster Woods, Bruce's Mill, Greenwood 50,000.00 . Conservation Foundation 60,000.00 TOTAL $ 260,000.00 The Greater Toronto Region Trail System - Phase I - 1993 development, will include: . Trail Signage $ 300,000.00 . Trail Maps 100,000.00 . Trail Construction 1.100.000.00 TOTAL $ 1.500,000.00 The program is tentatively scheduled to start July 1, 1993, subject to all funding approvals and detailed plan approval by the member municipalities. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for the 1993 Planning and Development program is contained in the 1993 Preliminary Capital Budget Estimates and will also include works funded in 1992 to be completed in 1993. CONSERVATION AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD #4/92, JANUARY 15, 1993 E-32 SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 8. GREA TER TORONTO REGION TRAIL SYSTEM -Trail Signage Ian Deslauriers, Manager, Planning and Development, gave a graphic presentation of signage. KEY ISSUE Interim report on Trail Signage. Res. #34 Moved by: Deborah Sword Seconded by: Donna Patterson IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the Interim Report on Trail Signage be received. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has been working on Greenway Trail development and management issues for several years. Past efforts have included visiting a variety of trail management juriSdictions; preparing a manual on trail planning and design guidelines; completing a report and mapping for trail routing; and developing a manual for trail signage: The purpose of the trail signage study is to collect information on the types of signage that are rnost appropriate for inter-regional scale trails through the greenways of our watersheds. The objectives of the study are to examine trail signage needs for walking (including the di~abled), hiking, cycling, equestrian, and cross country skiing. The focus is on directional, interpretive, regulatory and informational srgnage in the following manner: . Identify current trail and related signage standards for municipal (local and regional). public and private agency and provincial scale trails; . Collect relevant material from. national and international agencies on trail design, construction, installation and maintenance standards; . Consult with representative municipal and provincial agencies on trail signage issues and concerns; . Prepare signage design, construction, installation and maintenance guidelines for each type of public trail use. Additionally, staff have been working with The Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto in developing suitable donor recognition. Signage is a very important element of the recognition policy for large donors and preliminary designs have been provided for that purpose. Staff has invited active participation of a number of its existing and proposed partners to assist in developing the trail signage policy. Included are Metro Parks and Property Department, local municipal recreation departments, Central Lake Ontario, lake Simcoe and Credit Conservation Authorities, Ministry of Tourism and Recreation, Ministry of Transportation Ontario, Ministry of Natural Resources, and Waterfront Regeneration Trust. TERMINA TION The meeting terminated at 1 1 :05, January 15, 1993. Lorna Jackson J. C. Mather Chair Secretary-Treasurer Ibb