Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAuthority 1980 ~ A-l , the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes 24TH ANNUAL AUTHORITY MEETING FRIDAY-FEBRUARY-1-1980 11/80 The Twenty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Authority was held on Friday, February 1, 1980, at the City of North York Municipal Offices, 5100 Yonge Street, Willowdale. The Meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber. PRESENT WERE Chairman R. Grant Henderson Vice-Chairman Mrs. F. Gell Members M.W.H. Biggar U.J. Breen F.J. Brown S.W. Caldwell E.H. Card R. Fitzpatrick D.G. Fleet ~IS. J.A. Gardner R. Gillespie Mrs. L. Hancey Gavin Henderson W.R. Herridge, Q.C. C. Jessop D.J. Johnson R.W. Johnson E. King D.W. Kitchen C.F. Kline E.V. Kolb Dr. T.H. Leith M.D. Lipton, Q.C. S.A. Macpherson Mrs. V. Marshall Mrs. S. Martin V.K. l-1cCreary R.A.P. Moran F.R. Perkins J.S. Scott G.B. Sinclair B.V. Singh R.E. Starr M.M.R. Stewart Mrs. N. Stoner Mrs. B. Sutherland l-irs. H. D. Sutter Al an Tonk s Dr. W.M. Tovell Mrs. J. Trimmer Mrs. A. Walker H.G. Westney D. White R.F..M. Yuill Ministry of Natural Resources R.J. Burgar " n . R.M. Dixon . . . R.D. Hunter " . . R. Hicks S ta ff K.G. Higgs W.A. McLean W.E. Jones T.E. Barber R.K. Cooper A-2 -2- Staff (Contd. ) P.B. Flood n.R. Garrett J.D. Agnew Mrs. A.C. Deans Miss A. Hayhoe J.W. Maletich J.C. Mather Mrs. M. Hosseau D.J. Prince Mrs. M. Mi tche 11 Mrs. K. Conron ABSENT WERE Members W.G. Barber l-1rs. C. Bell D. Di Giannantonio F.J. McKechnie Mrs. N. Pownall R. Skjarum G.A. Williams The Meeting opened with '0 Canada', with the following Invocation Prayer being offered by the Reverend A. Dumont of Beverley Hills United Church: "NOW, in this time, we look for Your guidance. Now, in this time, we thank You for Your blessings. Through our activities in the past year, we have souqht with dignity, sincerity and integrity to be of service to the public. In whatever we do, p God, place our activities in the proper perspective, that what we do may be for the betterment of the society around us., and for the preservation and conservation of the natural resources that have been placed in our care. In our deliberations and meetings, help us to use a wisdom which looks not only at immediate solutions, but one which sees far into the future, that the blessings we now share with each other may be shared by our sons and daughters and their friends. In all our endeavours for so many, may we, who are so few, use our talents wisely, to the benefit of many generations. Be our Guide. Be our Leader. Teach us to work with justice, compassion and integrity, that what You have given to us may not be destroyed, but increased. For all this we ask in Your name and give thanks. AMEN. n GREETINGS The Chairman introduced Alderman Barry Burton, who addressed the meeting on behalf of the Mayor and Members of Council of the City of North York: "We want to welcome you to our City once again and look forward to continued good relations with the M.T.R.C.A. I think that as a municipality, we have given ample evidence of our interest over the past years, and our concern and desire to co-operate with the aims and objectives of the Authority. As different lands have become rezoned, we have encouraged developers to deed - considerable lands to the M.T.R.C.A. In that regard, and with no desire to indicate that we want to stop this at all, I think that, as indicated by the evidence of our co-oporation, there will be times when we are going to come to you and say that some property you may have obtained might be valuable to become part of the North York park lands to make some of our parks more viable. If that time does come, I hope we can count on you for your support in a small way and in the way we have co-operated in a large way. In the meantime, we are glad you are here, and I hope you will continue to come." -3- A-3 The Chairman called upon Mrs. Gell to respond to the Greetings from the City. RESPONSE "Alderman Burton, I hope that you will take back to the Board of Control and members of Council our very sincere thanks for the co-operation of North York, and tha t you will find us a willing partner when you are ready to negotiate." APPOINTl-iENT OF CHAIRMAN The Secretary-Treasurer read Order-in-Council #81/80, approved by Her Honour the Lieutenant Governor, dated the 10th day of January, A.D. 1980: "upon the recommendation of the Honourable Robert Welch, Deputy Premier and Minister of Energy, the Committee of Council advise that pursuant to the provisions of The Conservation Authorities Act, R. Grant Henderson, Woodbridge, a member of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, be reappointed Chairman of the said Authority for a further term, expiring with the first meeting of the Authority in 1981." MEMBERSHIP The Secretary-Treasurer certified as to those entitled to be Members of the Authority. List of municipalities, with representatives, attached to these Minutes as Schedule "A". MINUTES The Minutes of Meeting .5/79 were presented. Res. U Moved by: R.F.r-i. Yuill Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: The Minutes of Meeting #5/79, as presented, be adopted as if read. CARRIED J INTRODUCTION OF NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS The Chairman introduced the following new Members of the Authority Municipali ty Member Regional Municipality of Durham Mrs. Norah Stoner Regional Municipality of Peel Mrs. H. Dianne Sutter The Chairman then introduced Messrs. R.J. Burgar, R.n. Dixon, R.D. Hunter and R. HickS from the Ministry of Natural Resources. Mr. R.J. Burgar, Director, Conservation Authorities & Water Management Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources brought Greetings from the Minister, the Honourable J.A.C. Auld. He expressed his personal appreciation and that of the Branch and the Region for co-operation experienced with the Authority over the past year, hoping it would continue through the ensuing year, enabling both the Ministry and the Authority to do an even better job of management in the area. Mr. Henderson expressed the appreciation of the Authority. . PRESENTATION OF LIFE-TIME PASS TO SECRETARY-TREASURER Mr. Henderson informed the members that Mr. Higgs had become eligible to receive a Life Time Pass some time ago. It was deemed appropriate to make the present- ation on the occasion of this Annual Meeting of the Authority which coincided with Mr. Higgs' birthday. Mr. Higgs received the Pass with appreciation. A-4 -4- 1979 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE AUTHORITY Mr. Henderson presented the 'REPORT TO TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL MEETING - THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY', assisted by Mr. W.A. McLean, the Chairmen of the various Boards, and the Chairman of The Metropolitan Toronto & Region Conservation Foundation. " Res. #2 Moved by: D.W. Kitchen Seconded by: C. Jessop RESOLVED THAT: The 'REPORT TO TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL MEETING - THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY' be received with appreciation and ,appended as Schedule "B" of these Minutes. CARRIEDJ RULES & PROCEDURES FOR ELECTION OF OFFICERS AND EXECUTIVE CO~~ITTEE The Secretary-Treasurer drew attention to the Rules & Procedures for Election of Officers and Executive Committee, including the appointment of non-members of the functional advisory boards, advising that the Executive Committee will be con- sidering the, appointments on Wednesday, February 13, for presentation to the Authority on February 22. ELECTIONS Mr. Henderson was in the Chair for the conducting of the 1980 Election of Officers and Executive Committee. APPOINTMENT OF SCRUTINEERS Res. #3 Moved by: R.F.l-1. Yuill Seconded by: D.W. Kitchen RESOLVED THAT: Messrs. \v.A. McLean and W.E. Jones be appointed Scrutineers for the Election of Officers. CARRIEDJ ELECTION OF VICE-CIlAIRMAN OF 'I'HE AUTHORITY Nominations were called for the Office of Vice-Chairman. Mrs. F. Gell was nominated by Mr. F. Brown. Res. #4 Moved by: C.F. Kline Seconded by: G.B. Sinclair RESOLVED THAT: Nominations for the Office of Vice-Chairman of the Authority be closed. CARRIEDJ MRS. F. GELL was declared elected by acclamation. ELECTION OF CHAIm~N OF CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD Nominations were called for the Office of Chairman of the Conservation Land Management Advisory Board. Mr. E.V. Kolb was nominated by Mr. G.B. Sinclair. . Res. #5 Moved by: Mrs. F. Gell Seconded by: H.G. Westney RESOLVED THAT: Nominations for the Office of Chairman of the Conservation Land Management Advisory Board be closed. CARRIED: E.V. KOLB was declared elected by acclamation. ELECTION OF VICE-CHAI~J OF CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD Nominations were called for the Office of Vice-Chairman of the Conservation Land Management Advisory Board. Mr. W.G. Barber was nominated by ltt. E.V. Kolb. Res. 16 Moved by: C.F. Kline Seconded by: G.B. Sinclair -5- A-5 RESOLVED THAT: Nominations for the Office of Vice-Chairman of the Conservation Land Management Advisory Board be closed. CARRIED; W.G. BARBER was declared elected by acclamation. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN OF FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION ADVISORY BOARD Nominations were called for the Office of Chairman of the Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board. Mr. J .S. Scott was nominated 'by Mr. ILG. Westney. Res. '7 Moved by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner Seconded by: G.B. Sinclair RESOLVED THAT: Nominations for the Office of Chairman of the Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board be closed. CARRIED; J.S. SCOTT was declared elected by acclamation. ELECTION OF VICE-CHAIRl--iAN OF FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION ADVISORY BOARD Nominations were called for the Office of Vice-Chairman of the Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board. Mr. W.R. Herridge was nominated by Mr. J.S. Scott. Res. 118 Moved by: M.M.R. Stewart Seconded by: S.A. Macpherson RESOLVED THAT: Nominations for the Office of Vice-Chairman of the Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board be closed. CARRIEDJ W.R. HERRIDGE was declared elected by acclamation. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN OF HISTORICAL SITES ADVISORY BOARD Nominations were called for the Office of Chairman of the Historical Sites Advisory Board. Mr. M.W.H. Biggar was nominated by Mr. M.D. Lipton. Mr. F.R. Perkins was nominated by Mrs. S. Martin. Res. 19 Moved by: S.A. Macpherson Second~d by: Mrs. B. Sutherland RESOLVED THAT: Nominations for the Office of Chairman of the Historical Sites Advisory Board b~ closed. CARRIED, Following the counting of the ballots and the report of the Scrutineers, M.W.H. BIGGAR was declared elected. ELECTION OF VICE-CHAIRl--iAN OF HISTORICAL SITES ADVISORY BOARD Nominations were called for the Office of Vice-Chairman of the Historical Sites Advisory Board. Mr. F.R. Perkins was nominated by Mr. J.S. Scott. Res. no Moved by: M.D. Lipton, Q.C. Seconded by: H.G. Westney RESOLVED THAT: Nominations for the Office of Vice-Chairman of the Historical Sites Advisory Board be closed. U CARRIEDJ / F.R. PERKINS was declared elected by acclamation. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN OF INFORMATION & EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD Nominations were called for the Office of Chairman of the Information & Education Advisory Board. Dr. T.H. Leith was nominated by Mr. E.H. Card. Res. '11 Moved by: C.F. Kline Seconded bys D.J. Johnson A-6 -(>- RESOLVED THAT: Nominations for the Office of Chairman of the Information & Education Advisory Board be closed. CARRIEDJ DR. T.ll. LEITH was declared elected by acclamation. ELECTION OF VICE-CHAIRMAN OF INFOlUll\TION & EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD Nominations were called for the Office of Vice-Chairman of the Information and Education Advisory Board. Dr. W.M. Tovell was nominated 9Y Dr. T,.H. Leith Res. #12 Moved by: D.J. Johnson Seconded by: A. Tonks RESOLVED THAT: Nominations for the Office of Vice-Chairman of the Information & Education Advisory Board be closed. CARRIED: DR. \'1.M. TOVELL was declared elected by acclamation. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN OF WATERFRONT ADVISORY BOARD Nominations were called for the Office of Chairman of the Waterfront Advisory Board. Mr. M.J. Breen was nominated by Mr. D.G. Fleet. Res. #13 Moved by: H.G. Westney Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED 'THAT: Nominations for the Office of Chairman of the Waterfront Advisory Board be closed. CARRIED J M.J. BREEN'was declared elected by acclamation. ELECTION OF VICE-CHAIRMAN OF WATERFRONT ADVISORY BOARD Nominations were called for the Office of Vice-Chairman of the Waterfront 'Advisory Board. Mr. D.W. Kitchen was nomina~ed by Mr. M.J. Breen. Res. U4 Moved by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner Seconded by: l1rs. F. Gell RESOLVED THAT: Nominations for the Office of Vice-Chairman of the Waterfront Advisory Board be closed. CARRIED: D.W. KITCHEN was declared elected by acclamation. APPOINTMENT OF WATERSHED ADVISORY BOARDS Res. #15 Moved by: Dr. T.H. Lei th Seconded by: W.R. Herridge, Q.C. RESOLVED THAT: The Watershed Advisory Boards for 1980 be appointed as follows: DON VALLEY (13) Card, E.H. Johnson, D.J. Moran, R.A.P. Hancey, Mrs. L. Leith, Dr. T.H. Perkins, F.R. Henderson, Gavin Lipton, M.D. , Q.C. Singh, B.V. Herridge, W.R. , Q.C. Macpherson, S.A. Sutherland, Mrs. B. Tovell, Dr. W.M. ETOBICOKE-MHlICO (9) , " ;' , Breen, M.J. McKechnie, F.J. Skjarum, R. "'-./ Fleet, D.G. Pownall, Mrs. N. Starr, R.E. , P.Eng. Kline, C.F. Sinclair, G.B. Sutter, Mrs. H.D. -7- A-7 HUMBER VALLEY (l8) Barber, W.G. Gardner, Mrs. J .A. McCreary, V.K. Biggar, M.W.H. Gell, Mrs. F. Stewart, M.M.R. -, Brown, F.J. Gillespie, R. Tonks, A. Caldwell, S. \'J. Henderson, R. Grant White, D. Di Giannantonio, D. Jes'sop, C. Williams, G.A. Fitzpatrick, R. Koll>, E.V. Yuill, R.F.M. R.D.H.P. (11) Bell, Mrs. C. Marshall, Mrs. V. Trimmer, Mrs. J. Johnson, R. Martin, Mrs. S. Walker, Mrs. A. King, E. Scott, J.S. Westney, H.G. Kitchen, D. Stoner, Mrs. N. CARRIEDJ ELECTION OF CHAIRMEN & VICE-CHAIRMEN OF WATERSHED ADVISORY BOARDS The Authority recessed for the election of Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen of the Watershed Advisory Boards. Following recess, the Meeting resumed. Res. 116 Moved by: Gavin Henderson Seconded by: R.A.P. Moran RESOLVED THAT: The following Officers of the Watershed Advisory Boards be declared duly elected: DON VALLEY Chairman: Mrs. L. Hancey Vice-Chai rman: r-1.D. Lipton, Q.C. ETOBICOKE-MIMICO Chairman: C.F. Kline Vice-Chairman: D.G. Fleet HUMBER VALLEY Chairman: Mrs. J.A. Gardner . Vice-Chairman: R. Fitzpatrick R.D.H.P. Chairman: Mrs. S. Martin Vice-Chairman: H.G. Westney CARRIEDJ DESTROYING OF BALLOTS Res. U7 Moved by: Mrs. J .A. Gardner Seconded by: Mrs. F. Gell RESOLVED THAT: Al~ used ballots be destroyed. CARRIED: MRS. GELL expressed her appreciation for her re-election as Vice-Chairman of the Authority and for the support received for her nomination for office. The Vice- Chairman said she had valued greatly in past years the advice she had received from members, particularly since the inception of Regional Government. AUTHORITY PHOTOGRAPH All Members present were requested to assemble in the Council Chamber in order that a photograph of the 1980 Membership could be taken by the staff photographer. REPORT 116/79 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report *16/79 of the Executive Committee. Res'. U8 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: Mrs. J .A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Section I of Report 116/79 of the Executive Committee be receivedJ and that the recommendation as contained therein and set forth herein be adopted: A-8 -8- 0 Item 1, Section I Information & Education Division -1979 Budget Revisions Water & Related Land Management - Community Relations (Development) W.IO: Lake St. George Conservation Field Centre The 1979 Budget Revisions to Water and Related Land Hanagement - Community Rela tions ( Development) (W.10) be included in the 1979 Budget Estimates of the Authority. CARRIED; Res. #19 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #16/79 be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #16/79 of the Executive Committee, pages B-343 to B-381 inclusive, dated October 24, 1979. CARRIED; REPORT #l 7/79 OF THE EXECUTIVE COHMITTEE The staff presented Report #17/79 of the Executive Committee. Res. #20 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: D.J. Johnson RESOLVED THAT: Section I of Report #17/79 of the Executive Committee be received; and THAT Recommendations (a) , (b) and (c) , as set forth herein, be adopted: (a) The works outlined in the brief: "Channel Improvements on the East Humber River at Oak Ridges in the Town of Richmond Hill", dated september, 1979, be approved; (b) The Regional Municipality of York be requested to approve the work proposed in the brief; 0 (c) The Regional Municipality of York be advised that, subject to the approvals required for the Interim Water and Related Land Hanagement Project 1979- 1981 being obtained, the Authority is prepared to proceed with the channel improvements on the East Humber River at Oak Ridges in the Town of Richmond Hill, as set out in the brief dated September 1979, on the basis of funding provided for these works in the Project. CARRIED; Res. #21 Moved by: H.D. Lipton, Q.C. Seconded by: D.J. Johnson RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #17/79 be received and approved, as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #17/79 of the Executive Committee, pages B-383 to B-409 inclusive, dated November 14, 1979. CARRIEDJ REPORT #18/79 OF TIlE EXECUTIVE COHMITTEE The staff presented Report #18/79 of the Executive Committee. Res. #22 Moved by: Mrs. L. Hancey Seconded by: G.B. Sinclair RESOLVED THAT: Section I of Report #18/79 of the Executive Committee be received; and THAT Recommendations Nos. 10 and 13, as set forth herein, be adopted: no REMUNERATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND VICE-CHAIRMAN The Authority make application to the Ontario Hunicipal Board for authorization to pay the Chairman #18,000.00 per annum and the Vice-Chairman #7,000.00 per annum, effective January l, 1980. -9- A-9 113 MEMBERS - PER DIEH The Authority make application to the Ontario Municipal Board for authorization to pay members per diem in the amount of $45.00, effective January 1, 1980. CARRIED; Res. #23 Moved by: Mrs. S. nartin Seconded by: Mrs. B. Sutherland RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #18/79 be received and approved, as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #l8/79 of the Executive Committee, pages B-4l1 to B-448 inclusive, dated December 5, 1979. CARRIEDJ REPORT Il9/79 OF THE EXECUTIVE COrrnITTEE The staff presented Report #l9/79 of the Executive Committee. Res. 124 Moved by: J.S. Scott Seconded by: D.J. Johnson RESOLVED THAT: Report #l9/79 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #19/79 of the Executive Committee, dated December 19, 1979. CARRIEDJ REPORT #20/79 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #20/79 of the Executive Committee. Res. '25 Moved by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner Seconded by: R. Gillespie RESOLVED THAT: Report #20/79 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #20/79 of the Executive Committee, dated January 9, 1980. CARRIE D J REPORT #2l/79 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMrHTTEE The staff presented Report #21/79 of the Executive Committee. Res. 826 Moved by: Mrs. F. Gell Seconded by: Mrs. H.D. Sutter RESOLVED THAT: Section I of Report #2l/79 of the Executive Committee be receivedJ and THAT Recommendation #1, as set forth herein, be adopted: !! STATUTORY RESOLUTIONS FOR THE TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY (a) Appointment of Auditors THAT Clarkson, Gordon & Company be re-appointed as Auditors of the Authority for the year 1980; (b) Borrowing Resolution - 1980 WHEREAS it is necessary for The rietropoli tan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (hereinafter called 'the Authority') to borrow up to the sum of FIVE MILLION DOLLARS ($5,000,000.00) required for its purposes until payment to the Authority of any grants and of sums to be paid to the Authority by the participating municipalities designated as such under The Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1970, Chapter 78, as amendedJ BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED: 1. THAT the Authority may borrow from The Royal Bank of Canada or the Authority's member municipalities up to the sum of FIVE MILLION DOLLARS ($5,000,000.00) necessary for its purposes on A-IO -10- the promissory note or notes of the Authority until payment to the Authority of any grants and of sums to be paid to the Authority by the participating municipalities at such rate of interest as the Minister of Natural Resources approves; 2. THAT the signing officers of the Authority are hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the Authority a promissory note or notes for the sum to be borrowed under paragraph numbered 1 hereof and to affix thereto the Corporate Seal of the Authority; 3. TI~T the amount borrowed pursuant to this resolution, together with interest thereon at the rate approved by the Minister of Natural Resources, be a charge upon the whole of the monies received or to be received by the Authority by way of grants as and when such monies are received and of sums received or to be received by the Authority from the participating municipalities as and when such monies are received; 4. THAT the signing officers of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to apply, in payment of the monies borrowed pursuant to this resolution, together with interest thereon at the rate approved by the Minister of Natural Resources, all monies received by the Authority by way of grants or sums received by the Authority from the participating municipalities. CARRIED; Res. #27 Moved by: W.R. Herridge, Q.C. Seconded by: M.J. Breen RESOLVED THAT: Recommendation #2 of Section I of Report #2l/79 of the Executive Committee, as amended and set forth herein, be adopted: #2 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS 1980-l980 THAT the following Schedule of Meetings be adopted for 1980: FEBRUARY FRIDAY FEBRUARY 1 2:00 P.M. AUTHORITY TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL Friday February 8 1:30 p.m. Information & Education ill Tuesday February 12 l: 30 p.m. Conservation Land Management #l Wednesday February 13 10:00 a.m. Execu ti ve U Friday February 15 9:30 a.m. Flood Control U FRIDAY FEB RUARY 22 2:00 P.M. AUTHORITY #2 (BUDGET) MARCH Wednesday March 5 10:00 a.m. Executive #2 Thursday March 6 l:30 p.m. Waterfront U FRIDAY MARCl1 7 l:30 P.M. INFORMATION SEMINAR FOR AUTHORITY MEMBERS REGARDING THE WATERSHED PLAN Friday March 14 1:30 p.m. Historical Sites U Tuesday March 18 1:30 p.m. Humber Valley #! Wednesday March 19 lO:OO a.m. Executive #3 Thursday March 20 1:30 p.m. R.D.H.P. #! Wednesday March 26 1:30 p.m. Don Valley U Friday March 28 l:30 p.m. Etobicoke-Mimico #1 APRIL wednesday April 2 lO:OO a.m. Executive #4 Wednesday April l6 lO:OO a.m. Executive #5 Wednesday April 30 lO:OO a.m. Executive #6 -11- A-ll MAY FRIDAY MAY 9 2:00 P.M. AUTHORITY # 3 (NATERSHED PLAN) Wednesday May l4 10:00 a.m. Executive i7 Wednesday May 28 lO:OO a.m. Executive i8 ~~ Wednesday June II lO:OO a.m. Executive 19 FRIDAY JUNE 20 lO:OO A.M. AUTHORITY f4 Wednesday June 25 lO:OO a.m. Executive IlO JULY Wednesday July 9 lO:OO a.m. Executive Ul Wednesday July 23 lO:OO a.m. Executive 112 AUGUST Wednesday August 6 10:00 a.m. Executive #l3 Wednesday August 20 lO:OO a.m. Executive #14 SEPTEMBER Wednesday September lO lO:OO a.m. Executive US Wedn~sday September 24 lO:OO a.m. Executive tl6 OCTOBER Wednesday October 1 lO:OO a.m. Executive U 7 FRIbAY OCTOBER lO 2:00 P.M. AUTHORITY #5 (PRELIMINARY BUDGET) Wednesday October l5 lO:OO a.m. Executive #18 Wednesday October 29 lO:OO a.m. Executive #19 NOVEMBER Wednesday November 12 lO:OO a.m. Executive #20 Wednesday November 26 lO:OO a.m. Executive i2l DECEMBER Wednesday December lO 10:00 a.m. Executive #22 JANUARY 1981 Wednesday January 7 lO:OO a.m. Executive #23 FRIDAY .JANUARY l6 2:00 P.M. AUTHORITY TWENTY-FIFTH ANNUAL Wednesday January 28 lO:OO a.m. Executive #1/8l FEBRUARY 1981 FRIDAY FEBRUARY 6 2:00 P.M. AUTHORITY #2 (BUDGET) ANY ADDITIONAL MEETINGS REQUIRED WILL BE HELD AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIRMAN CONCERNED CARRIEDJ Res. '28 Moved by: Mrs. F. Gell Seconded by: Mrs. H.D. Sutter RESOLVED THAT: Recommendation #3 of Section I of Report #2l/79 of the Executive Committee, as set forth herein, be adopted: II THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO & REGION CONSERVATION FOUNDATION -Appointment of New Member -Re-appointment of Member THAT the following recommendation of the members of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation be approved: A-l2 -12- (a) That Mr. F. Collict, Vice-President - Human Resources, Allstate, be invited to become a Member of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation for a 3-year term commencing February l, 1980; (b) That Dr. T.H. Leith be re-appointed to the Foundation for a further three-year period', commencing April 20, 1980. CARRIED; Res. #29 ' Moved by: C.F. Kline Seconded by: Dr. T.ll. Leith RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #21/79 be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #2l/79 of the Executive Committee, pages B-469 to B-515 inclusive, dated January 23, 1980. CARRIED; NEW BUSINESS Res. #30 Moved by: Mrs. J. Trimmer Seconded by: M.D. Lipton, Q.C. RESOLVED THAT: The Secretary-Treasurer be requested to forward copies of the Final Report, Organizational Review, Hickling-Johnston Limited, dated October 19, 1979, to all members of the Authority. CARRIEDJ Res. #31 Moved by: Mrs. J. Trimmer Seconded by: W.R. Herridge, Q.C. RESOLVED THAT: The Finance Sub-committee and representatives of senior staff meet with officials of the Borough of Scarborough to review the budget system adopted by the Borough; and THAT all members of the Authority be invited to attend. CARRIED; Res. # 32 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: M.J. Breen RESOLVED THAT: The Personnel Sub-Committee be requested to review the remuneration of ,the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Authority for 1981, taking into consider- ation remuneration paid to similar positions in other Authorities, Boards and Commissions. CARRIEDJ MRS. GARDNER reminded the members that, included in the Schedule of Meetings approved earlier in the meeting, is an Information Seminar regarding the Natershed Plan. The Seminar will be held on Friday, March 7, and Mrs. Gardner emphasized that if the Plan is to be acceptable and understood, it is essential that members attend. The Secretary-Treasurer advised the members that Meeting #2/80 (Budget) of the Authority will be held on Friday, February 22, 1980, commencing at 2:00 p.m., at the Borough of Scarborough. Res. #33 Moved by: C.F. Kline Seconded by: Mrs. J .A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: The Authority express its deep appreciation to the city of North York for hosting the Twenty-Fourth Annual Meeting. ADJOURNMENT On Motion, the Meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m., February 1. R. Grant Henderson K.G. Higgs Chairman Secretary-Treasurer A-13 SCHEDULE "A" THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEl-1BERS - 1980 Municipality ADJALA & MONO TOWNSHIPS GILLESPIE, R. THE MUNICIPALITY OF BARBER, W. G. METROPOLITAN TORONTO BIGGAR, M.W.H. BREEN, M.J. CARD, E.H. FLEET, D.G. GARDNER, MRS. J.A. GELL, MRS. F. HENDERSON, GAVIN HERRIDGE, W.R., Q.C. JOHNSON, J.D. LEITH, DR. T.H. LIPTON, M.D., Q.C. MACPHERSON, S.A. MARTIN, MRS. S. POWNALL, MRS. N. SCOTT, J.S. SINCLAIR, B. SINGH, BAL VIR SUTHERLAND, MRS. B. TONKS, A. TOVELL, DR. W. M. TRIMMER, MRS. J. WHITE, D. YUILL" R.F .M. REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY JOHNSOt-., R. OF DURHAM KITCHEN, D. MARSHALL, MRS. V. STONER, MRS. N. WESTNEY, H. REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY FITZPATRICK, R. OF PEEL KLINE, C.F. KOLB, E.V. McCREARY, V. K . McKECHNIE, F.J. SKJARUM, R. STARR, R.E., P.Eng. SUTTER, MRS. H.D. REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY BELL, MRS. C. OF YORK DI GIANNANTONIO, D. BANCEY, MRS. L. HENDERSON, R. G. .JESSOP, C. KING, E. MORAN, R.A.P. PERKINS, F.R. WALKER, MRS. A. WILLIAMS, G. A . PROVINCE OF ONTARIO BROWN, F.J. CALDWELL, S. W . STEWART, M.M.R. R.S.O. 1970 c. 78 S13(l) "Each member shall hold office until the first meeting of the Authority after the term for which he was appointed has expired." A-l4 SCHEDULE "A" REPORT TO TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL MEETING THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY REPORT TO A-l5 24TH ANNUAL MEETING THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY It has been rather an interesting experience to go through the annual reports for the last five years. There are many statements that keep repeating year after year. This is understandable because, after all, the mandate of the Authority has basic principles, namely the protection and preservation of our renewable natural resources. In the 1975 report, commenting on the 1974 activities, it states - "In many ways 1975 will be a year of consolidation. Budget constraints will not permit undertaking major new programs, but available funds will permit the consolidation and upgrading of existing programs." This statement still pertains today, but because of the cooperation and support we get from our member municipalities and the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Government of Ontario, the work of the Authority proceeds in an encouraging manner. It has been my good fortune, as Chairman, to have had an excellent Executive Committee. These people spend many hours at meetings disc~ssing reports and deciding on the manner in which the Authority should proceed. The help provided by the Vice-Chairman, Florence Gell, has been invaluable. Thank you all. This report would be remiss if special mention was not made of the work of the Foundation. To the best of my knowledge, our Foundation is unique in the scope of its activities. We will hear the details when Mr. Card presents his report. As in the past, the Chairmen of the Functional Advisory Boards will present their own reports. WATERSHED PLAN Since 1977 the Authority has been engaged in preparation of a Watershed Plan as required by the Province of Ontario. This preparation has involved extensive updating of the technical data base on which Authority programs are established and a thorough review of Authority programs and poli~ies in order to develop a comprehensive conservation program which will guide the Authority for the next several years. Since its inception in 1957, the Authority has taken a comprehensive approach to its program development and, in the early years, the conservation reports prepared by the Province of Ontario provided the necessary data base. Compre- hensive programs were prepared for flood control and water conservation, conservation areas, conservation land management, information and education, and historical sites. A major objective of the watershed planning process has been to improve the data base on which these programs are established and to integrate programs into a comprehensive plan for all Authority activities. The technical review for this work included: . preparation of new contour mapping of the valley systems; A-16 Report to the 24th Annual Meeting Page 2 . hydrologic and hydraulic modelling of all major streams; mapping floodlines for a range of events, up to and including the Regional Storm; identification of flood damage centres; establishment of technical criteria for development control as it affects floodplains and valleys; . inventories of erosion-susceptible sites; . identification of environmentally sensitive and significant areas; . development of storm water management criteria; . inventories of forest, agricultural and recreational capabilities on Authority-owned lands; . inventories of fisheries potential; . biophysical inventories of the valley system; ,) . visitor survey. A review of the existing programs and policies of the Authority was conducted through the preparation of an Interim Water and Related Land Management Plan and an Interim Conservation and Recreation Land Hanagement Plan which were considered by both the Functional and Watershed Advisory Boards, the Authority's participating municipalities and the Province of Ontario. The Plan preparation process will be complete by mid-year 1980. The Plan will set out the goals and objectives of the Authority for resource management in the Metropolitan Toronto Region and will identify roles for the Authority, its participating municipalities and the Province of Ontario in achieving the goals. In identifying the Authority's role, the Plan will set out the works and activities of the Authority which are necessary to fulfill its responsibilities. The Plan will be supported by a series of detailed programs which will form the basis of projects which the Authority will undertake. Flood Control Program This program identifies the flood susceptible areas in the Authority's region; sets out the protective and preventative measures necessary to deal with them; establishes a larger role for the flood warning and flood forecasting system; and establishes technical criteria to guide the development control program as it applies to the floodplain and valley lands. Erosion & Sediment Control Program This program deals with the protection of property threatened by erosion and establishes a priority basis for a work program. It also deals with on-stream sediment sources and outlines technical criteria for development control on sites affecting erosion susceptible areas. Land Acquisition Program This program establishes a criteria for the definition of hazard and conservation lands, by which lands can be judged suitable for acquisition, in the valleys and headwaters under the juriSdiction of the Authority and along the Lake Ontario Waterfront. A-l7 Report to the 24th Annual Meeting Page 3 Storm Water Management Program This program adds a new dimension to the work of the Authority and deals with the management of urban drainage as it relates to flood control, erosion and sedimentation, and provides guidelines for implementation by municipalities. Conservation Land Management Program This program deals with conservation measures which are required on Authority, public and private lands including reforestation, shrub and tree planting, offstream er,osion control and stream improvement for fisheries potential. It also deals with agricultural and forest management of Authority lands and advice on resource management for private landowners. Regional Recreation Program This program deals with the recreational use of conservation lands, including those lands managed by the Authority and those lands managed by municipalities. It establishes criteria for Authority management and defines those lands which are suitable for municipal management. Waterfront Program The Waterfront Program continues the policies by which the Authority has carried out development on the Lake Ontario shoreline and sets out the works both in recreational development and shoreline management which are necessary to meet Authority objectives. Heritage Conservation Program The Heritage Conservation Program defines the role of the Authority in the management of historical and archeaological sites on Authority lands and deals primarily with the Black Creek Pioneer Village. Community Relations Program Most aspects of the community Relations Program are common to all of the other programs in the Plan and the program sets out a means by which the Authority can inform and educate the community in resource management. The schedule of Advisory Board Meetings which has been prepared for the early part of 1980 has been drafted to enable all Advisory Boards to consider the aspects of the Watershed Plan which pertain to them, prior to its being considered by the Authority on May 9, 1980. HISTORICAL SITES ADVISORY BOARD M.W.H. BIGGAR For the Historical Sites Advisory Board and its principal operation, the Black Creek Pioneer Village, 1979 was a year of expectation, as well as some disappointment and sadness. Mr. Wm. C. Davidson, Q.C., who had contributed much to The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and the Advisory Committee, passed away. A-18 Report to the 24th Annual Meeting Page 4 On a happier note, and to our great delight, the Village was chosen by several large organizations as a site for such convention activities as barbeques, picnics and evening parties (The International Congress of Biochemists and Shoppers Drug Mart,between them,brought over 4,700 visitors to the Village). However, overall attendance for 1979 shows a decrease from the 1978 position. This disappointing decline was, in part, attributable to a decline in school tour bookings, as well as the wet December weather. In o~der to Continue to attract visitations from large conferences, more suitable facilities, such as are envisaged in the proposed Visitors' Centre, are essential. Revenues in 1979 showed considerable promise, surpassing those recorded in 1978. This is attributable to the commendable efforts of the Village interpreters and craftspersons in their various sales outlets. However, when the proposed Visitors' Centre is brought on stream, these revenues will likely be increased considerably. Unfortunately, the Village's expenditures exceeded plan and this suggests that more careful review may be required in 1980 if, in the medium term, there is to be a reduction in the gap between expenditures and revenues. Consistent with the direction established by the Advisory Board and approved by the Executive Committee, a Plan of Development for Black Creek Pioneer Village was develope9 which called for the construction of a Visitors' Centre containing, in its first phase, facilities for ticketing, sales outlets, cafeteria and general accommodation, among others. This concept was approved by the Authority and steps were undertaken to approach a charitable foundation known to the Authority. Unfortunately, that foundation had wound down its investment program and recent economic and political events have necessitated the development of more rational and pragmatic financial plans. Nonetheless, prospects for the Visitors' Centre still remain good and, considering the benefits which could accrue from the tourist facilities near Maple, which have received considerable support from the government, it is not only appropriate but timely to consider bringing the Visitors' Centre on stream with the opening of the Maple development. During the past year, successful activities have brought considerable recognition to the "living" pioneer community. These include the Annual Rogationtide Service conducted by the Anglican Suffragan Bishop of Toronto, The Right Reverend Allan A. Read; a new evemt - the evening outdoor Hymn Sing - comprising several Anglican Church choirs and the Etobicoke Temple Salvation Army Band with Bishop Read leading the service; and the successful fall Pioneer Festival, to name but a few. Extra research and registration assistance was provided by students hired under the Provincial Experience '79 Program and a special Ministry of Culture and Recreation project. Special mention should be made of the support provided by outside groups including the Southern Ontario Unit of the Herb Society of American and the Dunnington Grubb Foundation. Their assistance made possible the hiring of a qualified student to interpret the Doctor's House 11edicinal Herb Garden. Building restorations continued during 1979 with activities focusing on the Sawyer's House, the Richmond Hill Manse and the Taylor Cooperage. A large drive shed near the Mennonite Meeting House was completed, as were two temporary school portables to be used by students, skaters and other groups. Again, this year the Ministry of Correctional Services has provided much appreciated A-19 Report to the 24th Annual Meeting Page 5 assistance to work on maintenance at Black Creek as part of an inmate rehabilitation program. A very special word of appreciation is in order for the late Mr. William Davidson for his magnificent personal donation, as well as the Province, Wintario, the Junior League of Toronto and The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation for their generous financial support and good counsel. Without their collective involvement, the living memorial to early Ontario pioneers would have been difficult to achieve. WATERFRONT ADVISORY BOARD M.J. BREEN 1979 was another productive year of waterfront development, both in terms of facilities created and plans completed for future projects. Humber Bay West At Humber Bay West Phase II, an additional lOO,OOO cubic yards of fill material were received, which was sufficient to substantially comp~ete the landfill configuration to a total of 43 acres. The exterior shoreline configuration has been achieved and temporarily armoured with rubble material. We are still optimistic that federal assistance may be obtained to provide for the final armouring of headland perimeters. Although the Authority's plans did not provide for construction of any support facilities in 1979, the. Humber Bay Boating Federation took a giant step forward in the development of its site with the installation of 460 permanent docking slips. The harbour has now reached its initial design capacity and the Federation has stopped accepting additional names on its waiting list, which has already reached 300. Federation input to the site planning process, related to location of parking areas, boat storage areas, buildings and other details, is an ongoing proce~s in preparation for substantial development by both Federation and Authority in 1980. Detailed plans for the Authority's proposed construction program in 1980 for interior shoreline protection and site servicing are well under way. Humber Bay East At Humber Bay East in 1979, very significant progress was made toward completion of the site. Site servicing is virtually complete and major features of park buildings and structures related to the pond system were substantially complete by the end of the year. Success achieved at this site in 1979 has resulted in only paving and final landscaping remaining to be done in 1980. Bluffers Park At Bluffers Phase II, the landfill program continued on schedule as a result of receiving approximately 300,000 cubic yards of fill materials. The landfill portion of Phase II has now reached 42.2 acres. The federal contribution to final armouring of the landfill shape continued throughout 1979 and has resulted in total federal contribution of approximately 1.7 million dollars thus far. Only one headland remains to be armoured and the federal Department of Fisheries A-20 Report to the 24th Annual Meeting Page 6 " ~. "'ltJ and ocea~~las already arranged for purchase an~ stockpiling of required materials. As at Humb~r Bay, the Bluffers Boating Federation also made good progress in 1979 wit~ the installation of 120 permanent mooring slips. Plans are nearing completion for construction of a similar number of docks in 1980. At the present ra te, docks are being constructed as quickly as the Autho~ity is able to complete the required land base, and it appears that initial design capacity of 500 wet mooring boats will be achieved by 1981 or 1982. Initial phases of site servicing began to the Federation site in 1979, with completion of primary hydro service to,the Federation island. A signifi~ant portion of the development budget for Bluffers was allocated to construction of two new double launching ramps and appropriate parking areas, as well as extension of the parking lot at Phase I. These improvements should assist in satisfying the demands of the large number of people who continue to be attracted to this site. Aquatic Park Future involvement of the Authority in development of Aquatic Park became more probable in 1979 as the result of a project to construct a dredge ate disposal area on the exposed shoreline, which will help to resolve the final armouring issue. Serious discussion also took place in 1979 related to transfer of title for the area from the province to the Authority. Shoreline Management The shoreline management responsibilities of the Authority are expected to become increasingly important in the years ahead. 1979 saw construction of shore protection works at Crescentwood Parkette in the Borough of Scarborough, as well as the Eastern Beaches in the City of Toronto. Construction techniques employed proved to be very cost effective, so plans are being prepared to extend the Crescentwood revetment in 1980 to protect the shoreline adjacent to Kingsbury Crescent, as well as the remainder of Crescentwood Road. Detailed engineering research related to bank stability was also initiated in 1979 to provide quidance for future protection along Scarborough Bluffs. Land Acquisition The land acquisition component of the Waterfront Project moved ahead relatively Slowly in 1979 due to a lack of funds. Efforts were concentrated on consolidating the Authority's holdings in the Frenchman's Bay area. A signifi- cant accomplishment related to acquisition in 1979 was negotiation of a master agreement with the Town of Ajax to provide for operation and maintenance of waterfront lands. Planning Planning activities continued in 1979 to prepare for some of the major new initiatives expected in the next Waterfront Project. Work continued on Master Plans for East Point Park, Western Beaches and the Guild Inn. Major efforts were directed towards approval of the Colonel Samuel Bois Smith A-2l Report to the 24th Annual Meeting Page 7 Master Plan, which is subject to Environemntal Assessment Act approval. The Authority will be required to submit its Environmental Assessment to the Environmental Hearing Board and be successful at the Hearing in order to prpceed with this project. The major objectives of the last two years of the project will be to complete Humber Bay East, substantially complete Humber Bay West, and proceed with surface development of Bluffers Phase II. At the same time, steadily increasing efforts will be required to control shoreline erosion. It will also be important to finalize plans for major new initiatives to be undertaken in the next five- year project at Colonel Samuel Bois Smith Park, Western Beaches, East point Park, Aquatic Park and the Guild Inn. FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION ADVISORY BOARD J.S. SCOTT The Flood Control Section of the Water Resource Division operated in 1979 under the first year of the three year Interim Water and Related Land Management Project. This project, which was prepared in 1978, provides a total of $11,400,000 for the three year term of the project and enables the Authority to carry out the Flood Control Plan Review in preparation for inclusion in the Authority's new Watershed Plan, as well as providing funding for flood and erosion control works and the floodplain and headwater lands acquisition program. During 1979, 443 acres were acquired under 37 separate transactions. Land requirements for the Stouffville Channel were finalized, and property was acquired throughout all watersheds under the jurisdiction of the Authority. The review of the Authority's Plan for Flood Control and Water conservation which began in 1976 was continued in 1979. Under this program, the Au thor i ty completed calculation and plotting of new floodlines on the new mapping prepared for all watersheds. With this information, the Authority completed an inventory and economic evaluation of all major flood-vulnerable areas within its area of jurisdiction. Environmental data collection and assessment of various water- courses was also continued in 1979. In addition, the Authority commenced a study on Storm Water Management which will provide policies and criteria for the Authority, its member municipalities, developers and consultants regarding storm water management. The Water Resource Division has completed draft programs for Flood Control, Erosion and Sediment Control, Land Acquisition and Storm Water Management which will form part of the Authority'S new Watershed Plan. These draft programs have been discussed with the regional municipalities, via the Flood Control Task Force, and by the Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board. The erosion control program of the Authority continued in 1979 under the Interim Water and Related Land Management Project, with an increased level of funding in Metropolitan Toronto. Works were also undertaken in the Regional Municipalities of Peel, York, and Durham. A total of l8 major sites were completed: ~ of these ~- .._.1..____,.. ............... "'''''''Y'''nnrn 4 ; n Pee 1 . 6 in York and 2 in Durham. A-22 Report to the 24th Annual Meeting Page 8 . .l...- " ,':~'''.''), '~,,' ~1.v":~~J~;jr, The third and final y.ear ,?f~~~l;H~.'gllla" :" ," '~..~lll~~~l wor:~s progr:.am completed the rectification of rem.q.'ining 5-ites d!tP'~YJfl'OOdS in 1976 and 1977. A total of $775,000 was sp~nt over, the th~e':ye~r period restoring Authority-owned works on the Highland Creek within the Boro~gh of Scarborough. Construction of channel improv~ments in tP.~ TP,wn of Whitchurch-Stouffville commenced in the fall of 1979 and virtually final restoration was completed by the end of 1979. This work involved construction of a gabion channel and replacement of four bridges. Maintenance of Water Control Structures was continued, with major remedial work being carried out on the Brampton Diversion Cnannel, Lower Humber Channel and Goodwood Pumping Station. und~rwater inves~igation of the Humber River weirs was also undertaken. The preliminary engineering study was completed for proposed channel improvements on the East Humber River at Oak Ridges. Property negotiations are now under way, and it is anticipated that construction will commence in 1980. Planning and Policy staff reviewed 2,697 Committee of Adjustment and Land Division applications, 1,164 Ontario Municipal Board applications, 249 Zoning Amendment applications, 231 Draft Plans of Sub-divisions, 159 Official Plan Amendments, 84 Official and Secondary Plans, 210 Title Searches and 45 Niagara Escarpment Commission and Parkway Belt applications. In addition, 357 Building Permit applications were processed. With respect to enforcement of Ontario Regulation 735/73 fOJ;'Fill , Construction and Alter~t~9~ to Waterways, 75 Violation Notices were mailed and a majority of these were rectified to the satisfaction of the Authority. The remainder are still being dealt with. CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD E.V. KOLB During 1979 the Conservation Land Manage~nt Division has worked on two program components of the Watershed Plan,: . Conservation Land Management; and . Regional Recreation. An interim policy statement was prepared for consideration by various Advisory Boards, the Province of Ontario and the Authority's participating municipalities. Comments have been received and will be incorporated in the Programs being prepared. To assist in preparing proposals for recreational use of Authority lands, a visitor survey was conducted during 1979. A report of the findings of this survey will be available by the spring of this year. The Authority's programs for conservation land management have continued to respond to increasing demands, particularly by private landowners. For example, during 1979, there was a 50% increase in the number of seedlings planted in the reforestation program. A-23 Report to the 24th Annual Meeting Page 9 Special projects undertaken during 1979 have also been successful. The Strategic Planning for Ontario Fisheries (S. P.O. F.) program, sponsored by the Ministry of Natural Resources, provided for fish habitat enhancement along the Duffin Creek. It is anticipated that this wQrk will continue, in 1980, in the headwaters of both the Duffin Creek and the Humber River. Rehabilitation of the South Thackeray Sanitary Landfill Site, using landscape plantings, was begun in 1979 and will continue as a five year project being funded by Metropoli~an Toronto. During 1980 a major landscape project will be undertaken at Humber Bay East in preparation for the anticipated opening of this waterfront site in August. The increase in planting programs has been made possible through increasing the capacity of the Authority's nursery operation in the Boyd Conservation Area. Construction of a new nursery building in 1980 will add to these facilities. A very successful Public Workshop on Stream Improvement was held at Claremont Conservation Field Centre in 1979 and will be followed-up in 1980 by sessions on urban wildlife improvement, woodlot management and similar workshops to assist private landowners. Conservation Areas attracted greater attendance during the summer 'months of 1979: however, a slight overall decrease was experienced for the whole year due to the affect of poor weather which significantly decreased winter skiing opportunities. Special programs, such as the Maple Syrup Demonstrations at Bruce's Mill Conservation Area, increased in attendance. A new recreation program of Canoe Instruction and Rental was initiated at Claireville Conservation Area with an open house on May l3th. The strong response of both general public on weekends and evenings, and school and organized groups on weekdays, resulted in a very successful summer program. These programs, plus high summer attendance, provided the budgeted income to meet costs of operation in Conservation Areas: however, the level of revenues was, once again, shown to be highly dependent on good weather conditions. Budget constraints have severely restricted development of Conservation Area facilities that would provide the attraction to increase Area attendance. During 1979, developments undertaken included provision of a residence and office for the campground operation at Albion Hills and of safety improvements to the Cold Creek Rifle Range. The building at Cold Creek will provide storage of ammunition, washroom facilities and shelter, as well as assisting in control of use of the Trap Range. Additional parking has also been provided at Cold Creek in response to increased use. Footbridges were constructed at Greenwood and Albion Hills Conservation Areas to improve trail facilities for hiking, cross country skiing and snowmobiling. INFORMATION AND EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD DR. T.H. LEITH The Information and Education Advisory Board is responsible for development of policy to guide the Division's operations in the implementation of two programs: . Community and Staff Relations, and . Outdoor and Conservation Education. A-24 Report to the 24th Annual Meeting Page 10 The 1979 Staff Progress report details the achievements of these programs, which included increased emphasis on the basic resource management activities of the Authority. The following gives an indication of the effectiveness of the programs: 1,660 press clippings were received in 1979 227 one-minute film clips of Authority activities appeared on Ontario television stations 315,000 pieces of literature describing Authority programs were distributed to the community 54,830 news and photo releases were distributed to the media and school boards to highlight Authority and Foundation activities. The media, including radio, television and the press, are to be thanked for their support in using materials provided to promote all of the Authority's programs. Three new public service television spot announcements on Flood Control, the Kortright Centre for Conservation , and The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation are nearing completion. , Many special events were successfully planned and carried out in 1979 including; . June 21st Official Opening of the Kortright Centre for Conservation by The Honourable Robert Welch, Q.C. . Hurricane Hazel 25th Anniversary Seminar held October 3rd in the Council Chambers at Toronto City Hall . May 8th Arbor Day program at the Authority office . Bill Davidson's Day Garden Party at Black Creek pioneer Village on July 5th. In addition, watershed tours, Town Hall Meetings and publication of "Inside" have been very successful in providing information to Authority staff. Exhibits, developed to depict the work of the Authority, were displayed at a number of events during 1979. The most significant of these was developed for Authority participation in the Canadian National Exhibition and designed to highlight the 25th Anniversary of Hurricane Hazel and the subsequent resource management achievements of the Authority. Continued participation in the promotional programs of the Convention & Tourist Bureau of Metropolitan Toronto, during 1979, has enabled the Authority to make visitors to the region aware of its facilities. Conservation and Outdoor Education programs were well supported during 1979 and all operated near capacity. Over 4,140 groups, in excess of l03,600 individuals participated in all programs. The residential Centres at Albion Hills, Boyd and Claremont and the day-use Cold Creek Conservation Field Centre all exceeded 90% occupancy resulting in an outstanding use of these facilities. The educational programs at Black Creek Pioneer Village operated at approximately lO% below capacity due to constraints imposed by the need to charge higher fees and by both Authority and School Board budget restrictions. Planning is progressing for development of additional residential facilities A-25 Report to the 24th Annual Meeting Page 11 in response to the requirements of user groups. Construction of the residential Lake St. George Conservation Field Centre, to accommodate 34 students, began in December 1978 and was completed, after unforeseen delay, in January 1980. A second dormitory to house a further 34 students was begun in October 1979 and is scheduled for completion by June to enable occupancy by September 1980. This facility and the educational programs provided are planned in cooperation with the Metropolitan School Boards, the Metropolitan Separate School B~ard and the York County Board of Education. The Kortright Centre for Conservation, officially opened in June 1979, provides an outstanding opportunity for adults and families to learn about conservation and resource management through the theme areas of Forest, Wildlife, Land and Water. Programs are also available to schools and other youth groups, by reservation. During 1979, developments included the building of exhibits and displays; construction of an outdoor patio; alteration and enhancement of the entrance area; and completion of ten kilometres of nature trails. The Centre is a tribute to the work of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation which has provided funding for the building, furnishings, equipment and exhibits from private and corporate donations, and assisted by a major contribution from Wintario. As part of the Centre's Official Opening ceremony, a tree was planted in recognition of Elgin H. Card, Chairman of the Foundation; the special role he played in the Foundation's fund raising activities; and for his voluntary and untiring efforts in heading the campaign to build and equip the Kortright Centre for Conservation. THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION FOUNDATION E.H. CARD Fund raising has become a highly competitive operation, particularly in view of the fact that Wintario has injected specific matching requirements from the public sector. Neverth~less, the Foundation has met its responsibility during 1979, bringing the total funds raised since inception, including "In Kind", pledges and Wintario Accounts Receivable as at December 3l, 1979 to approximately $3,000,000.00. It is with deep regret that we report the demise during 1979 of three important members of the Foundation; Mr. John G.C. Weir, President and Member of the Executive Committee, Mr. H. Stanley Honsberger, Q.C. , a former Chairman and founding Member and Mr. William C. Davidson, Q.C. , Director and founding Member. The loss of these Members and their wise advice and counsel is felt by all of us. One of the main features of 1979 was the completion of the Kortright Marsh in the Boyd Conservation Area, and which attracted many hundreds of wild waterfowl during the fall migration season. Engineering, design and construction was financed through the Foundation by Ducks Unlimited (Canada) . The B. Harper Bull Conservation Fellowship Awards Fund was considerably increased during 1979, thanks to the promotion instigated by Mr. Kenneth G. Higgs. At current interest rates and indicated financial subsidy by Foundation Members, this will provide four potential awards in 1980 of $600.00 each. A-26 <~ ' :.)' f<, Report to the 24th Annual Meeting . Page 12 ~he Minist'~~Of Culture and Recre,ation ,:~ilYj,<~~~oved a Non-Capital Grant on t,'.,~p .~ ~~1:"- . " ...'~,; ". . January 10, 1979 for the Kortright Centre <.or :Conser,vat~on ~n the amount of . " $116,660.00 for equipment, exhibits and dijplays, providing that a matching amount was raised by public subscription. A high percentage of these funds has been raised and will be completed wi thin the time, frame established. The Foundation Endowment Funds have grown during 1979 to pr9vide substantial support to both Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Kortright Centre for Conservation. Most of the funds have been raised to complete the final stages of restoration projects at Black Creek Pioneer Village, which includes the Cooperage, the Sawyer's House, and the Richmond Hill Manse. Once again, I would like to emphasize that all this has been made possible because of generous financial support from Canadian Foundations, Wintario, The Canadian National Sportsmen's Fund, the Ontario Waterfowl Research Foundation, the Ministry of Natural Resources, National Museums Canada, Ducks Unlimited (Canada) , corporations, industries, businesses, estates, service clubs, individuals and many other organizations, as well as the assistance received from Authority Departments and, in particular, Information and Education and Historical Sites. The financial support of all Authority Members is again solicited, which will have a material effect on the assistance that the Foundation will be able to provide for Authority educational and historical sites programs. ---------------- CLOSING REMARKS: Last October was the 25th Anniversary of Hurricane Hazel. At a presentation at Toronto City Hall many people recollected their experiences during and after that disaster. In my presentation, I concluded that apathy is our worst enemy. Then on Christmas Day, 1979 and January 11, 19801 there were floods centred on the Don and Highland Creek Watersheds. There are some unknown factors which could influence the manner in which this Authority could proceed, namely the population growth in the Regions, while Metropolitan Toronto remains somewhat static~ the extent of growth in the Reg ions could influence the lower valley systems~ changes in the population distribution will have long-term effects on Authority programs. By the end of 1981 the Authority will be required to adopt a new Waterfront Project and a Water and Related Land Management Project. Both of these existing Projects terminate at that time. Indications are that there is increasing concern for environmental management. I hope that all governmental levels will reflect this concern in their budgets. Tennyson once said, "We may use the position we have reached as a stepping stone to go on to greater things, or as a pedestal on which to pose and alienate ourselves from the goals to be achieved." It is my fervent hope that this Authority will continue to con~inpr ir ic:: c:+-::llnA;n...... _.... ~ ~~---~-- -~---- ~~ A-27 (!7 the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority m~nQJtes ----- A UTII 0 RI 'l'y (DUDGET) HEETING FRIDAY-FEBRUARY-22-l980 f/2/80 ~ Meeting #2/80 of the Authority was held on Friday, February 22, 1980, at the Borough of Scarborough, Civic Centre, Scarborough. The Meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. in the Meeting Hall. PRESENT WERE Chairman R. Grant Henderson Vice-Chairman Mrs. F. Gell Members W.G. Darber M.W.H. Biggar M.J. Breen S.W. Caldwell E.H. Card D.G. Fleet Mrs. J.A. Gardner R. Gillespie . Mrs. L. lIancey R.W. Johnson E. King C.F. Kline E.V. Kolb Dr. T.H. Leith M.D. Lipton, Q.C. S.A. Hacpherson - Mrs. V. Marshall "F.J. HcKechnie F.R. Perkins J.S. Scott G.B. Sinclair R.E. Starr Mrs. N.J. Stoner Mrs. J. Trimmer H.G. Westney D. l'lhi te Staff K.G. Higgs W.A. McLean W.E. Jones T.E. Barber R.K. Cooper P.B. Flood M.R. Garrett J.D. Agnew Miss A. Hayhoe J.W. Maletich J.C. Mather Mrs. K. Conron Miss J.. Trivelli ABSENT WERE '. Members Mrs. C. Bell F.J. Brown D. Di Giannantonio R.J. Fitzpatrick Gavin Henderson W.R. Herridge, Q.C. C. Jessop D.J. Johnson D.W. Kitchen Mrs. S. Hartin V.K. McCreary A-28 -2- ABSENT WERE (Contd.) Members R.A.P. Moran Mrs. N. Pownall B.V. Singh R. Skjarum M.M.R. Stewart Mrs. B. Sutherland Mrs. H.D. Sutter A. Tonks Dr. W.M. Tovell Jvlxs. A. vlalker G.7\.. l'lilliams R.F.H. Yuill ;.IINU'rES ..---- :'he l-linutes of !'lee'ting ifl/aa \'rere presented. :~.es. j~34 t-;oved by: C.F. Kline Seconded by: G.I3. Sinclair RESOLVED THAT: The Hinutes of HC'et:lng #-1/80, as presented, be adopted as if read. Ci\RRIED; GREETINGS -- Controller Joyce Trirmner brought greetings from the Borough of Scarborough: "I am sure I do not ha.ve to tell you what a pleasun'O! it is for me to be welcoming you, on behalf of Mayor Gus Harris, to Scarborough. You have been here before and we are always very happy to have you back again. Scarborough has benefited' immensely from its association with the Conservation Authority. I would liken it to an association much like a modern marriage, - it is a two-way system: you have helped Scarborough to acquire and maintain some very precious natural jewels. We owe to you acqu~sition of the Guild Inn, the Zoo, Bluffers Park - all assets in the protection of our beautiful Bluffs area. I might also mention Tam O'Shanter .... In a very small way today, it is Scarborough's pleasure to have our Treasury Department, for example, make a presentation to you regarding our budget system. We look forward to when you come to us and other municipalities and make a presentation regarding storm water management and give us your guidance in how we should be developing and controlling storm water. It is very important and this is how you are, again, going to be helping us. It is not just a question of the Authority getting into the land acquisition business and handing it over, it goes much deeper than that. It is an association which is very, very important, and the more we can work with each other, the more you make presentations to the municipalities, I think the closer the relationship is going to become. It is something I treasure very much indeed and I know Scarborough does, and we look forward to wel- coming you again and again and again: Thank you for coming." The Chairman called on Mr. J.S. Scott to respond. "As a resident of the Borough of Scarborough, it is a real pleasure for me to thank Controller Trimmer and the Borough for allowing the Authority to meet here this afternoon. I also wish to express the appreciation of the Finance Sub-Committee and those Authority members who attended this morning at the presentation by the Treasury Department regarding the financial system under which the Borough operates. It will be helpful to us in setting up our new system and I thank the 130rough for this opportunity." REPORT U/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COHNITTEE The staff presented Report #1/80 of the Executive Committee, which was dealt with by separate resolutions. -3- A-29 Item 1, Section I 1980 Budget Estimates Mr. Scott presented the 1980 Budget Estimates. Res. #35 Moved by: W.G. Barber Seconded by: F.R. Perkins RESOLVED THAT: The 1980 Budget Estimates, as appended as Schedule f'AII of these Minutes, be received; and THAT Mr. Scott, the members of his committee and staff be thanked for the excellent budget report; AND FURTHER THAT the 1980 General Budget Estimates and 1980 Capital Program, dated January 30, 1980, be adopted; AND FURTHER IN THIS CONNECTION TI~T the following action be taken: (a) All Current projects included in the 1980 General Budget Estimates be approved and adopted; and (b) WHEREAS The Conservation Authorities Act provides that, for the carrying out of any Project, an Authority shall have the power to determine the portion of total benefit afforded to all municipalities that is afforded to each of them, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority therefore enacts as follows: (i) That all member municipalities be designated as benefiting for all General Current Projects included in the 1980 General Current Budget; (ii) The Authority's share of the cost of all General Current Projects included in the 1980 General Current Budget, as set forth in the 1980 General Current Budget, shall be raised from all member municipalities as part of the 1980 Annual General Levy; (iii) The 1980 Annual General Levy for Administration, Operations and Maintenance Programs, Conservation and Recreation Land Management and the current programs of Ivater and Related Land Management, be apportioned to the participating municipalities in the portion that the equalized assessment of the municipalities or part bears to the equalized assessment of the whole area under the juris- diction of the Authority, unless otherwise provided in the Levy; (iv) The appropriate Authority officials be instructed to advise all municipalities pursuant to The Conservation Authorities Act and to levy the said municipalities the amount set forth in the 1980 General Current Levy; (v) The Executive Committee be authorized to reduce the said Budget and Levy, should such action be deemed expedient; (c) The 1980 Capital Works Program and the 1980 Capital Levy for Projects included therein and dated January 30, 1980, be adopted; and WHEREAS The Conservation Authorities Act provides that an Authority may, from time to time, determine what monies will be required for Capital expenditures in connection with any project, and further provides for the method of raising such monies from the participating municipalities, THAT the following action be taken: (a) All member municipalities be notified of the amount of such monies they are required to raise in 1980, on the basis set forth in the 1980 Capital Works Program and Levies for: (i) The Interim Water and Related Land Management Project 1979-l981; (ii) The'Metropolitan Toronto and Region Waterfront Project 1977-l981, proposed to be carried out in 1980; (b) The ~1unicipality of Metropolitan Toronto be levied for the Supplementary Project to the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Waterfront Project 1977- 1981; A-30 -4- (c) The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be levied for the Supplementary Project to the Interim l'later and Related Land Management Project 1979- 1981 for the dredging of the Keating Channel - Don River; (d) The appropriate Authority officials be instructed to advise all municipalities pursuant to The Conservation Authorities Act, and to levy the said municipalities the amounts set forth in the 1980 Capital Works Levies. CARRIEDJ Item 2, Section I Appointments to Functional Advisory Boards ar.d Executive Sub-Commitb;~es: 1980 ---.. ------ .~~~-- Thf?~ S(:.:c::c:tary-r::r~;,::surer: p.Lt:;.:"jr:;:;ntcd tho li"t of n'.er..bers ~:ecom;n<::nc1ed to the vcu:iou::; Fu.nctional 1"1cl.visory Bacu.:'cls.. and J::xccu,tivo Sub-Cornmittee3. Res. #36 ~iavcd bY': R.E. S t,arr ------ Seconde.d hy: [-.:rs. J.A. Gardner ;.>.E20rJVr::D TI-ll,T: rl':1C l.ist of D'1':.~r;~:.J2rs recom::'~:~~nded for &~poi:1trnGnt to the Functional Ac.vi.sory Boards <lnd E:;.;ecutivo:: Sul.J-Commi tt:ces, be rcc8ived and approved, as set forth in Section I of tbe ])'LLnui:es of E:cecutive ConuTtittee Heetin<] #1/80, d~ted Feb ruary 13, 1980. Cl\RIUED; 3ECTION II -------- Hes. #37 !-~o',re(l by: plrf3.. ,J .1\. Gardnc)l: ------ Seconded b.y: Bi<Jgar M. 1'1 .Il. RESOLveD TI-Ll\T: Section rr of Report ffl/80 b~ received and approved as set forth in the I'linutcs of N',"8tillg 11'1/80 of the E:~~2cuti ve Cormni t1:ce I pages B-5 t:o B-.18 inclusive, dated February 13. 1980. CARRIEDJ NEI'l BUSINESS Honour Roll Awards - MRS. GARDNER reminded the members that the Authority celebrates Arbor Day each year with Honour Roll Awards to persons making a significant contribution to the aims and objects of the Authority. Nomination forms will shortly be mailed to all members and ~trs. Gardner requested their co-operation in the consideration and return of nominations by March 14, 1980. MRS. GARDNER further reminded the members of the special meeting to be held at the Authority offices on FRIDAY, MARCH 7, 1980 at 1:30 P.M. - an INFORMATION SEHINAR REGA"RDING THE WATERSHED PLAN. Lunch will be served to members at 12:30 p.m. MR. BIGGAR announced a change in the scheduled meeting date for Meeting H/80 of the Historical Sites Advisory Board; a t ,the request of several members of the Board, this meeting will now be held on Thursday, March 13, commencing at 9:30 a.m. ADJOURmlENT On Motion, the Meeting adjourned at 3:10 p.m., February 22. R. Grant Henderson K.G. Higgs Chairman Secretary-Treasurer KC. I . THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 1 9 8 0 BUD GET EST I M A 1 E S * MARCH 5, 1980 *Authority Resolution #35/80 (Meeting #Z/80, held Feb-ZZ-1980) Clause (b) (v) refers: "The Executive Committee be authorized to reduce the said Budget and Levy, should such action be deemed expedient;" tI) (") :J: t:l t::I c::: t-< t:l :t- o I ::- w . .... - THE "~""'~"",\""~O' '''A". TCROi'\TO a REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORiTY l\:"~ i -'.:'. . I; .", _ l.... l J..... ,.a. ~ J l'''-~; '" BUDGET ESTIMATES ~ .....)\) , WATER a RELATED Ml'~f1:r"AL l.EVV LAND MANAGEMENT ~ .:. ~2~'. ~2a 3J.9O/" $ 4,833,030 34,7% Wt,r:::I?I"RONT $ 3,202,000 23.0% PROVINCE OF ONTA;'1iO $ 4,980,892 3~'7% . OPERATION e. MAINTENANCE + 3,945,500 28.3% ~::v.: ~"_1! . $ 3, ,)CJ. 5~O 22,2 % 0-8% CC:':S~RVATION a RECREATION FGU:!(':,Tl~~! a WINTARIO $ ....-:: 2'0 3'20/0 $ 2'36,000 2.4% .0_, I - -. - N SOURCeS 0(' "'f IN~''\'~ ALLOCA TI ON OF FU!\JDS l"'l (" v I, i_I! i't ,) I ...; THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 1980 BUDGET EST I f1A TES I N D E X PAGE(S) PAGE(S) 1 - 4 Budget Report CONSERVATION & RECREATION LAND MANAGEMENT 5 - 5a Budget Summary 6 - 6b Municipal Levies 35 - 36 Conservation Areas - Support 6c Basis of Apportionment of Municipal Levies 37 - 40 Conservation Areas - Projects 41 - 42 Conservation & Niagara Escarpment Land ADMINISTRATION 43 - 44 Information & Interpretive Program 45 - 46 Rent & Utilities 7 - 8 'Administration 47 - 48 Taxes & Insurance OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE WATERFRONT 9 - lO General Operations 49 - 50 Waterfront Support 11 - l2 Conservation Area Operations 13 - 14 Information & Education Operations SPECIAL PROJECTS l5 - 16 Black Creek Pioneer Village 51 - 53 Waterfront Plan WATER & RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT HISTORIC SITES 17 - 18 Operations & Maintenance of Water Control Structures 19 - 20 Community Relations - Support 54 - 55 Historic Sites Development 21 - 22 Community Relations - Development 23 - 24 Taxes & Insurance WATER & RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT 25 - 32 Interim Project 33 - 34 Interim Project - Supplementary - Keating Channel >' I W W ~ I w ~ 1 9 8 0 1. CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGET ESTIMATES AUTHORITY PURPOSE, ACHIEVEMENTS AND OBJECTIVES The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has adopted a program designed to further the conservation, restor- ation, development and management of the natural resources of the 1,339 square miles included in the Authority's area of juris- diction. The Authority has identified the region's river vall~ys, the Lake Ontario shoreline and the headwater areas of the Oak Ridges inter lobate moraine, and the Niagara Escarpment as the major resources to which its programs are applied. Established resource management programs include flood control and water conservation, erosion control, waterfront development, and fish and wildlife management. In implementing these progrlms, 26,600 acres of land have been acquired and, in addition to their being managed for the conservation functions they perform, they are made available to the community for outdoor and conservation education, recreation and historic sites purposes. Within these comprehensive program guidelines, the Authority his, over the years, reflected the priorities and policies of the partners, the participating municipalities and the Province of Ontario as expressed through the representative Authority members. Since 1957, 61% of the Authority's capital and development budget has been devoted to Water and Related Land Manage- ment, 25% has been devoted to Lake Ontario Shoreline Management, 12% to Conservation and Recreation Land Management and 2% to Outdoor and Conservation Education. The 1980 budget estimates for administration, operations and mlintenance, current and capital programs reflect the emphasis on Flood Control and Water Conservation, provide for the management of lands and facilities acquired and developed in connection with this program, and continue the approved Waterfront project at a reduced rate. FOmiAT OF PRESENTATION These budget estimates are in accordance with the requirements of The Ministry of Natural Resources "Policy. Procedure and Information Manual for Conservation Authorities". There are five major types of Provincial grants available through t~e Mini~try of Natural Re~ource~ to Oon~ervation Authorities:- l) Administration 4) Special Project~ ana Pro~ram~ 2) Water & Related Land Management 5) Supplementary Grants (not applicacla to M,T.R.C.A.) 3) Conservation & Recreation Land Management f 2. AUTHORITY PROGRAMS The Authority,Programs in these budget estimates are in seven basic categories:- , 1) Administration 4) Conservation & Recreation Land Management Administration a) Conservation Areas - Support b) Conservation Areas - Development 2) Operations & Maintenance c) Cons. Area Information & Interp. Program d) Rent & Utility Services a) General Operations e) Taxes and Insurance b) Conservation Area Operations c) Information & Education Operations 5) Waterfront d) Black Creek Pioneer Village Operations Waterfront - Support 3) Water & Related Land Management a) Operations & Maintenance of Water Control Structures 6) Special Projects b) Community Relations - Support Waterfront Plan c) Community Relations - Development d) Taxes and Insurance 7) Historic Sites e) Interim Water & Related Land Management - Current & Capital f) Interim Water & Related Land Management - Keating Channel Historic Sites Development Expenditures on administration, operations and maintenance and current programs comprise the Authority's General Levy on ~ll participating municipalities apportioned on the basis of equalized assessment as supplied by the Province of O~tario. The basis of equalized assessment for 1980 has been changed in order to conform with the policy adopted by the Ministry of Natural Resources regarding "Changes to Provincial Equalization Factors (Provincial Equalized Assessment) and Related Strategy to Reduce the Impact". Expenditures on capital programs are financed as a Capital Levy on municipalities based on levies designated in the specific projects. INTERIM WATER & RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT PROJECT The year 1980 is the second year of the three year Interim Water and Related Land Management Project. This project enables the Authority to establish and undertake a program designed to conserve, restore, develop and manage the natural resources of the watersheds within the area of its jurisdiction, in accordance with the Water and Related Land Management Plan. It is the intention that this Project, together with ongoing works which were initiated under earlier approved projects, shall form a single, consolidated Project. )I I w V1 ~ I 3. w ~ The provincial Cash Flow, which has been authorized for Water lLnd Related Land Management work in 1980, has required a reduc- tion in this Project. Amendments have been made to the budget accordingly. WATERFRONT PROJECT In 1977, the Authority commenced the second phase of the Waterfront Project. Originally this phase proposed expenditures of $4,400,000 per year over the five year period 1977-1981. Expenditures for 1977 were $2,876,482 and in 1978 $11,486,993 (including $8,500,000 for the acquisition of the Guild Inn). Metropolitan Toronto agreed to ~ncrease their share of the levy for this project by $496,000 each year for 1979, 1980 and 1981. Due to cash flow limitations from the Province, the $496,000 matching grant was not available in 1979. The 1980 budget provides for estimated expenditures of $2,l38,250 plus $992,000 for the supplementary project. A levy amount of $185,408 in 1980 is allocated to match expenditures and Provincial Grants for the ~rears 1977, 1978 and 1979. The total ~mount being levied in 1930 ~s within the project authorization as approved by the Ontario Municipal Board. THE 1980 LEVY The apportionment of the 1980 municipal levies is based on figllres supplied by the Province of Ontario and adjusted in accor- dance with the policy adopted by the Ministry of Natural Resources regarding "Changes to Provincial Equalization Factors (Provincial Equalized Assessment) and Relat~d Strategy to Reduee the Impact", In accordance with the policy adopted by the Authority, the Rel~iqnal Municipalities of Durham, Peel and York will be levied an amount equal to lOO% of the 1979 taxes paid by the Authority for revenue producing conservation areas within those munici- pali ties, Within Metropolitan Toronto, Authority lands are not subject to taxation. PROVINCIAL FUNDING- The Provincial grant structure used in these estimates is based on the cash flow which has been made available to tbe Authority to a maximum of tbe percentages shown. Administration 50% Water and Related Land Management 55% Conservation and Recreation Land Management 50% Waterfront Plan 50% The Province of Ontario has established the following level of funding for The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority for the 1980 fiscal year. Comparative figures for 1979 are also shown. f I 4. 1979 1980 Increase Budget Budget (Decrease) (1) Administration $ 638,500 $ 676,810 $ 38,3l0 (2) Water & Related Land Management a) General $ 383,350 $ 463,958 $ 80,608 b) Interim Project 1,90l,500 1, 817 , Ol9 * (84,481 ) c) WC-58 - Don River 49,845 - (49,845) d) Keating Channel - 110,000 110,000 €i) Additional for Waterfront Shoreline Management - 165,125 l65,125 $ 2,334,695 $ 2,556,102 $ 221,407 (3) Conservation & Recreation Land Management $ 233,000 $ 250,980 $ 17,980 (4) Special Projects - Waterfront (see also 2(e) above) $ 1,400,000 $ l,400,000 $ - $ 4,606,195 $ 4,883,892 $ 277,697 *Note: This figure includes an additional $50,000 for Flood Plain and Conservation Land acquisition to be funded from M.N.R. 1979 funds. > I w -...I .~..,. ..~- ....;.;.......--"--<.;:;&>.....-.:~- ". ..-.......------. ~-- --"~---_.__.~-- )I I w (Xl 1980 5, BUDGET SUMMARY 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS r-- 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES I REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY ADMINISTRATION [ 1,347,000 I~~oo Administration 1,455,160 70,000 1,385,160 676,810 708,350 - 1,346,491 50,987 OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE ! 112,000 I General qperations 116,200 24,300 91,900 - 81,900 10,000 107,671 51,661 16,500 Conservation Area Operations 1,696,000 982,335 713,665 - 713,665 - 1,417,848 753,858 1,370,800 710,000 Community Relations & Education 1,100,400 989,235 111,165 25,000 79,165 7,000 777 ,059 644,262 859,000 757,700 Black Creek pioneer Village 1,032,900 888,900 144,000 72,000 72,000 - 965,299 821,014 889,000 750,000 3,945,500 2,884,770 1,060,730 97,000 946,730 17,000 3',267,877 2,270,795 I 3,230,800 ~4,200 WATER & RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT Op. & Mntc. of W.C. Structures 209,940 - 209,940 115,467 94,473 - 181,826 - 184,000 - Community Relations - Support 278,120 - 278,120 152,966 125,154 - 246,041 - 239,000 - Community Relations - Development 459,000 - 459,000 41,800 34,200 383,000 487,148 290,102 560,194 484,194 Taxes & Insurance 279,500 - 279,500 153,725 125,775 - 240,140 - 198,000 - 1,226,560 - 1,226,560 463,958 379,602 383,000 1,155,155 290,102 I 1,181,194" 484,194 INTERIM PROJECT Water Control Projects 122,000 - 122,000 67,100 54,900 - 90,812 - 92,500 - Regulations 202,900 - 202,900 111,595 91,305 - 189,380 - 182,500 - , Conservation Services 259,100 62,500 196,600 108,130 88,470 - 212,134 14,979 208,000 15,000 All Benefiting 1,448,409 - 1,448,409 796,625 651,784 - 1,742,962 - 1,359,723 - Benefitjng Municipalities 1,374,061 40,300 1,333,761 733,569 600,192 - 1,777,615 4,303 1,776,690 27,000 3,406,470 102,800 3,303,670 I 1,8:"7,019 1,486,651 - 4,012,903 19,282 L 3,-619,413 I 42,000 5A. r I KEATING CHANNEL I I Keating Channel 200,000 - 200,000 110,000 90,000 - - - - - CONS. & RECREATION LAND MANAGEMENT I I I Conservation Areas - Support 159,750 - 159,750 79,1:75 79,875 - 142,284 - 143,500 I - Conservation Areas - Development 126,500 - 126,500 63,250 63,250 - 135,124 - 126,500 - Conservation Areas - Projects 23,000 23,000 - - - - 71,326 66,812 66,000 66,000 Cons. & Niagara Escarpment Land - - - - - - 55,054 - 48,800 - Information & Interpretive 22,680 - 22,680 11,:;40 11 , 340 - 22,513 21,000 - Rent & Utilities 43,280 - 43,280 21,640 21,640 - 39,375 39,000 - Taxes & Insurance 78,000 - 78,000 39,000 39,000 - 51,843 70,000 - 453,210 23,000 430,210 215,105 215,105 - 517,519 66,812 I 514,800 I 66,000 WATERFRONT I Fr-. Waterfront - Support 71,750 - 71,750 35,875 35,875 - 63,604 - 12,800,000 I Waterfront - Capital . 3,130,250 - 3,130,250 1,565,125 1,565,125 - 2,789,727 - I - HISTORIC SITES ,- 70,917 Historic Sites Development 46,000 - 46,000 - - 46,000 45,500 35,627 70,917 I Total Current 7,698,680 3,040,270 4,658,410 1,729,648 2,482,762 446,000 6,863,711 2,385,200 Total Capital 6,236,220 40,300 6,195,920 3,251,L44 2,944,676 - 5,966,413 27,000 13,934,900 3,080,570 0,854,330 5,427,438 446,000 13,198,776 2,733,605 I 1 4,980,892 ~2,830,1~~ ~~~412,200 ~ I W ~ )I I ,p. 0 6. THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY APPORTIONMENT OF 1980 LEVIES GENERAL PROJECTS - INTERIM WATER & RELA~ED LAND ~~AGEMENT PROJECT - WATERFRONT 1 980 LEV Y 1979 INTERIM WATER & RELATED PROJECT Waterfront Before Tax Total Incl. Total Incl. , Capital Capital I Special Plan Tax Adjust. Adjustment Tax Adjust. Tax Adjust Current All Ben. Ben. Mun. Total Keating 1977-1981 $ $ $' $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Adja1a 219 - 219 190 19 65 - 84 - 44. Durham 36,964 44,405 81,369 74,165 3,080 10,773 6,750 20,603 - i 18,367 Metro Toronto 1,806,605 - 1,806,605 . 1,660,497 170,411 596,014 354,942 1,121,367 90,000 " 1,679,542 (I) Mono 233 - 233 185 19 66 - 85 - 40 Peel 154,391 76,296 230,687 198,392 12,509 43,752 45,000 101,261 - 24,795 York 133,091 ' 27,306 160,397 138,321 11 , 062 38,689 193,500 243,251 - 27,745 Prov~ of Ontario 6,152 6,152 (Subsidy) --- - 2,137,655 148,007 2,285,662 2,071,750 197,100 MHl.~S~ tiOO, HI/! 1,4Bp,pSl ~O,OOO 1,750,533 ....--. -- . --- . .... . - -.. - . -.- . ~~ ._---- ~ (1) Includes $496,000 for supplementary project. f GA. THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND' REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY APPORTIONMENT OF 1980 GENERAL LEVY , Equalized Assessment Apportionment of Under Constrained General Levy Reduction General Formula % Before Taxes Subsidy Levy Adja1a 6,749 .010440 223 ( 4 ) 219 Durham 1,139,027 1.761948 37,664 ( 700 ) 36,964 Metro Toronto 54,634,442 84.513386 1,806,605 - 1,806,605 Mono 7,179 ,.011105 237 ( 4 ) 233 Peel 4,757,429 7.359212 157,315 ( 2,924 ) 154,391 York 4,101,077 6.343909 135,611 , ( 2,520 ) 133,091 Province of Ontario 6,152 6,152 (Subsidy) 64,645,903 100.000000 2,137,655 ~ 2,137,655 :t>' I ol>o I-' )I I ~ N THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORIT~ 6B, BASIS OF REDUCTION SUBSIDY , .' ,. Apportionment Based on Reduction Subsidy ,- Old 105% of Old Confltrllinad MUNICIPALITY Formula For!llula Formula, % $ Municipality Adjala Township .009759 .010247 .010440 .000193 4 Durham, Regional Municipality of 1.646863 1.729206 1.761948 .032742 700 Metropolitan Toronto 85.524910 89.801155 84.513386 - - Mono Township .010380 .010'899 .011105 .000206 4 Peel, Regional Municipality of 6.878538 7.222465 7.359212 .136747 2,924 York, Regional Municipality of 5.929550 6.226028 6.343909 .117881 2,520 100.000000 l05.000000 100.000000 .287769 6,152 ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL MUNICIPALITIES Durham, Regional Municipality of Ajax Town .574271 .602985 . G14402 .011417 244 Pickering Town .999725 1. 049711 1.069586 .019875 425 Uxbridge Town .072867 .076510 .077960 .001450 31 1.646863 1.729206 1.761918 .032742 700 Peel, Regional Municipality of Brampton, City of 2.683268 2.817431 2.8707'76 .C53345 1,141 Mississauga, City of 3.701970 3.887069 3.9GC661 .073595 1,573 Ca1edon Town .493300 .517965 . 52T772 .009807 210 6.878538 7.222465 7.359212 .1:36747 2,924 York, Regional Municipality of Aurora Town .018368 .019286 .019652 .000366 8 Markham Town 2.727294 2.863659 2.917879 .054220 1,l59 Richmond Hill Town 1. 218878 1.279822 1.304053 .024231 518 Vaughan Town l.472830 1.546472 1. 575752 .029280 626 Whitchurch-Stouffville Town .208835 .219277 .223.128 .00.1151 89 King Township .283345 .297512 .303145 .005633 120 5,929550 6.226028 6,343909 .117881 2,520 ---- , BASIS OF APPORTIONMENT - ~ruNICIPAL LEVY BASED ON THE LATEST EQUALIZF.D ASSESSMENT - (NOT WEIGHTED) (1978 ASSESSMENT DATA FOR 1979 TAXATION PURPOSES) Ge, % of POPULATION EqUALIZED ASSESSMENT Municipality in Old I New New Formula UUNICIPALITY in Autho rity Total Watershed Formula Formula +/- 5% Adjala Township 8 3,614 289 3,345 8,915 6,749 Durham, negional Hunicipality of * 68,076 54,338 564,501 l,320,028, l,139,027 Hetropolitan Toronto 100 2,l29,171 2,129,171 29,3l5,664 54,634,442 54,634,442 Hono Township 5 3,964 198 3,558 7,585 7,179 Peel, Regional Uunicipality of * 421,618 181,633 2,357,780 5,163,158 4,757,429 York, Regional Uunicipa1ity of * l58,732 128,383 2,032,492 4,735,745 4,101,077 2.785 175 2,494,012 34,277,340 65,869,873 64,645,903 Change Index 1.92 2.02/1. 83 ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL MUNICIPALITIES Durham, Regional Municipality of Ajax Town 86 23,281 20,021 196,845 475,964 397,l86 Pickering Town 95 33,956 32,258 342,679 774,907 691,443 UXbridge Town 19 lO,839 2,059 24,977 69,157 50,398 68,076 54,338 564,501 1,320,028 I l,139,027 Peel, Regional. Municipality of Brampton, City of 63 l23,837 78,017 919,753 2,035,031 l,855,839 Mississauga, City of 33 273,467 90,244 1,268,937 2,659,149 2,560,407 Caledon Town 55 24,314 13,372 169,090 468,978 341,183 421,618 181,633 2,357,780 5,163,158 4,757,429 York, Regional Municipality of Aurora Town 4 14,991 599 6,296 ] 3 , 94 5 ]2,704 Markham Town 100 61,HOl 61,801 934,844 2,141,976 1,886,289 Richmond Hill Town 99 35,184 34,832 417,799 1,005,146 843,017 Vaughan Town 100 lS,8GG 18,866 501 , 8/17 1,189,120 1,018,659 Whi tchurch-Stouffville Town 43 13,219 5,684 71 , 583 165,091 144,437 King Township 45 14,671 6,601 97,123 220,467 195,971 158,732 128,383 2,032,492 4,735,745 4,101,077 >' I * Not available in total 01:0 \.oJ ~ I 01>0 01>0 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Administration PAGE 7 PURPOSE: To provide the administrative and financial services of the Authority. ( 1980 OBJECTIVES: The continuation of general administration and financial support services for nll Authority programs. Salaries of senior administrative staff and associated secretarial, Administrators, tho Finance and Administration Division, are charged to this program together with employee benofits for all employoos. FUNDING: This is a shared program. The Provincial funding is based on tho cash flow which has been made available to the Authority and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: The budget estimates include:- - an increase in salaries & wages of 8% for an economic adjustment. Provision for merit increases, where applicable, is also provided. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Material s Salaries Employee Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Benefits Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total 621,610 460,500 178,250 - - , 194,700 100 - 1,455.160 . f 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Administration PAGE 8. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY I Salaries 621,610 - 621,610 310,805 310,805 - 549,925 - 560,.150 - I Employee Benefits 460,500 - 460,500 230,250 230,250 - 424,596 - 440,500 - I Travel Expenses 104,000 - 104,000 52,000 52,000 - 88,881 - 97,500 - ! Equipment Purchase & Renta 36,400 - 36,400 18,200 18,200 - 33,270 - 36,000 - I I Materials & Supplies 89,600 - 89,600 44,800 44,800 - 95,794 - 81,500 - i i Rent & utility Services 82,650 - 82,650 41,325 41,325 - 86,463 77,250 - i General Expenses 60,400 70,000 (9,600) (20,570) 10,970 - 67,562 50,987 54,100 70,000 I I ! i , , ~ I : I j , , ; I ! I I I i , I i I ! j ; > I [ TOTAL )( 1,455,160 I 70,000 I 1,385,160 )( 676,810 ] 708,350 I - )( 1,346,491 I 50,987 )( 1,347,000 I 70,000 )~ )I I ol>o 0'1 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Operations and Maintenance - General Operations PAGE 9. PURPOSE: To provide administative support services, for which a Provincial Grant is not available. 1980 OBJECTIVES: - to fund the maintenance of revenue producing properties and other general maintenance - to fund the public liability insurance on vehicles and equipment - to fund the office cleaning and maintenance - to fund the Authority's share of vehicll3s and equipment - FUNDING: Program revenues, the General Levy on all participating municipalities and Authority funds. I OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - 27,500 5,000 - 83,700 - - 116,200 , 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM operations & Maintenance - General Operations PAGE 10. 1980 BtJDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Rental Property Mainten- , ance - Revenue Producing Properties & General Maintenance 21,500 24,300 3,200 - 3,200 - 39,750 27,910 32,500 16,500 , Vehicle & Equip. Suspense 5,000 - 5,000 - 5,000 - (6,437) - 5,000 - I I I Insurance 12,850 - 12,850 - 12,850 - 10,225 - 12,000 - Head Office 10,000 - 10,000 - - 10,000 4,598 - 10,000 - I Flood Control Workshop 2,000 - 2,000 - 2,000 - 2,822 - 1,500 i - I I Office Cleaning 20,300 - 20,300 - 20,300 - 16,831 - 19,000 I - I Office Maintenance 38,550 - 38,550 - 38,550 - 39,882 - 32,000 I - , I Bank Interest - Non-Capita I I I Programs 23,751 i - - - - - - - - - I I . I I I I , j I ,- I I ! I ;l>' I [' TOTAL )( 116,200 I 24,300 I 91,900 )( - I 81,900 I 10,000 )( 107,671 I 51,661 J( 112,000 I 16,500 )~ :r>' I "'" co 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM ~erations and Maintenance - Conservation Area Operations PAGE 11., PURPOSE: The conservation nud manngement of lands under tho jurisdiction of tho Authority and tho provision of outdoor recreation opportunities. 1980 OBJECTIVES: - the management and operation of 18,000 acres of Authority lands including 13 conservation areas, which will provide 1. 5 million user days of recreation - provide for the same level of maintenanl:e of services as in previous years, reflecting continued budget limitations. Selective use and managem'mt of Authority lands is required to maximize use and minimize costs. - to provide self-supporting visitor services FUNDING: Program revenues and the General Levy on all participating municipalities. No Provincial Grant is available for this program. FINANCIAL CO~~lENTS: In 1980, projected program revenues have been estimated to be considerably higher than 1979, reflecting increases in fee program revenues. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utili ties Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,040,900 337,800 127,550 - 18,850 170,900 - 1,696,000 , I 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Operations & Maintenance - Conservation Areas PAGE 12. f 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY REVENUES I I Albion Hills 275,850 192,035 83,815 - 83,815 - 2~8,058 121,400 233,000 140,400 I I i Boyd 151,400 108,500 42,900 - 42,900 - 134,263 76,997 137,000 82,600 , Bruce's Mill 224,600 166,800 57,800 - 57,800 - 174,629 114,551 161,000 114,100 ! Claremont 56,650 18,800 37,850 - 37,850 - 48,957 12,203 50,000 I 11,000 I I Claireville 248,050 187,800 60,250 - 60,250 - 223,287 169,416 179,000 127,200 ; 130,950 i Cold Creek 69,400 61,550 - 61,550 - 104,411 50,022 92,000 42,300 : Glen Haffy 96,850 33,200 63,650 - 63,650 - 83,720 30,496 84,500 26,700 ; Greenwood 115,900 32,900 83,000 - 83,000 - 100,597 25,892 103,000 22,400 I 150,250 82,400 115,497 ' Heart Lake 67,850 - 67,850 - 64,610 129,500 67,700 I I : Humber Trails 10,200 1,800 8,400 - 8,400 - 7,216 1,569 9,000 1,500 : I ; I ~ Milne - - - ' - - - 6,969 10,139 7,800 7,800 ; Palgrave 14,150 7,000 7,150 - 7,150 - 6,020 5,611 9,000 9,000 . j Service Area 21,400 - 21,400 - 21,400 - 17,564 - 17,000 - : WOOdbridge 9,100 - 9,100 - 9,100 - 7,477 - 8,000 - ; Petticoat Creek 190,650 81,700 108,950 - 108,950 - 159,183 70,952 151,000 57,300 l I I I I i 1 i ; , I l )l ( ) ( 1 ,696,000 I TOTAL I 982,335 I 713,665 )( - I 713,665 I - )( 1,417,8481 753,858 J( 1,370,800 I 710,000 J~ I. I ~ VI 0 1980 CURRENT BUDGET Ec:rFvl r'J~=lQ 'OJ I .-. i-'OJ PROGRAM Operations & Maintenance - Community Relations - Information & Education Operations PAGE 13. PURPOSE: To provide an outdoor and conservation education program for school students and other cOlmnunity groups at five Conservation Field Centres and a variety of outdoor and conservation education opportunitics for the general public and school groups at the Kortright Centre for Conservation and at the Black Creek Pioneer Village. 1980 OBJECTIVES: - a continuation of the program at the same level of service as in 1979 for existing facilities and addition of lake St. George C. F. C. - to provide an outdoor and conservation education program for the following cstimated number of students and adults:- Black Creek Pioneer Village 64 , 000 Conservation Field Centres 18,500 Albion Hills Conservation Farm 9,000 Maple Syrup Days 31,000 Special Days, Field Trips, Claireville Dam Tours etc... l2,00U Kortright Centre for Conservation 50,000 FUNDING: Program revenues and the General Levy on all participating municipalities. A surplus or deficit on the operations of the Boyd Conservation Field Centre and Lake St. George Conservation Field Centre will, by agreement, be charged or credited to the participating boards of education. A grant of $25,000 from the Provincial Ministry of Culture and Recreation is estimated for the operation of the Kortright Centre for Conservation and $7,000 from The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation Kortright C~ntr@ Growth an~owrnent Fund. FINANCIAL CO~~NTS: The estiffi4tes provide fOr an increase in revenue to ~oV~~ th~ proj~~t~Q in~rpagp in ~~p~nditure~. The net cost to the muni~ip~lities is estimates at $79,16S. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utili ties Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 594,800 175,600 60,000 - 270,000 . - 1,100,400 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Operations and Maintenance - Community Relations - Information & Education Operations PAGE 14. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Albion Hills C.F.C. 158,000 158,000 - - - - 127,565 133,641 147,500 147,500 Boyd C.F.C. 180,000 180,000 - - - - 175,731 172 ,911 167,000 167,000 Claremont C.F.C. 158,000 158,000 - - - - 139,882 152,292 151,500 151,500 I Cold Creek C.F.C. 37,000 37,000 - - - - 37,609 37,282 36,500 I 36,500 I ! Lake St. George C.F.C. - I 180,000 180,000 - - - - 46,571 27,776 68,500 68,500 I -II 68,000 68,000 - - - - - - - - I . 11,000 11,000 6,783 9,277 10,500 10,500 ! General Interpret~ve Pro. , - - - - i B.C.P.V. Pioneer Life 38,550 26,000 1,2,550 - 12,550 - 31,864 21,227 37,500 I 24,500 I ! B.C.P.V. Tours 77,150 42,000 35,150 - 35,150 - 70,061 35,712 73,000 39,700 I Kortright 192,700 129,235 63,465 25,000 31,465 7,000 140,993 54,144 167,000 112,000 I , I ! : . i i I I I I I ! I i i I ; I i [ TOTAL )( 1,100,400 I 989,235 I ~1l,165 )[ 25,000 ] 79,165 I 7,000 ) ( 777,0591 644,262 J( 859,000 t 757,700 ) ~ I ~ I\J 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTfMf-\TES PROGRAM Operations and Maintenance - Black Creek Pioneer Village PAGE 15. PURPOSE: To provide a living portrayal of a crossroads village in pre-confederation Ontario. 1980 OBJECTIVES: - to continue the effective operation of this heritage conservation project within financial constraints - to accommodate in excess of 300,000 visitors - to maintain the Village's heritage structures within financial constraints FUNDING: Major funding comes from gate receipts and sales outlets. It is anticipated that the Authority will match grants from the Ministry of Culture & Recreation with levy funds. Additional funds are expected each year from the Foundation as the, Black Creek Growth Endowment Fund continues to expand. FINANCIAL CO~~ENTS: Additional revenue results from increase in admission fees and the optimizing of revenue from all Village trades and facilities. Due to budget constraints, it will not be possible to open the Dominion Carriage Works, Taylor Cooperage and Sawyer's House as planned. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 667,500 318,900 10,000 - 32,500 4,000 - 1,032,900 ~ , 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Ooerations and Maintenance - Black Crppk Pionper Villagp PAGE 16, 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Administration 188,000 - 188,000 - 188,000 - 192,390 - 178,000 - Building Staff etc... 434,600 - 434,600 72,000 362,600 - 336,845 - 338,600 - Food Facilities 19,500 - 19,500 - 19,500 - - - - - Gate House 18,300 - 18,300 - 18,300 - 17,264 - 16,500 i - Gif t Shop 141,800 - 141,800 - 141,800 - 117,862 - 122,600 I - Livestock 59,000 - 59,000 - 59,000 - 56,306 - 55,500 - Maintenance - Buildings 35,500 - 35,500 - 35,500 - 98,890 - 64,000 I - Maintenance - Grounds 39,100 - 39,100 - 39,100 - 62,844 - 49,300 - I Promotion & Publications 17,300 - 17,300 - 17,300 - 16,705 - 13,000 - I I Registrar 36,800 - 36,800 - 36,800 - 32,713 - 21,500 - I Revenue Activities 23,700 23,700 23,700 15,852 11,600 , - - - - - Security 19,300 - 19,300 - 19,300 - 17,628 18,400 - i Admission Receipts - 490,000 (490,000) - (490,000) - - 425,983 405,000 I Endowment Interest - 14,000 (14,000) - (14,000) - - - - 10,000 I Food Services - 45,000 (45,000) - (45,000) - - 33,940 - ! 40,000 I Revenue Activities i - 28,500 (28,500) - (28,500) - - 25,572 - i 18,000 I Rentals & Miscellaneous - 8,000 (8,000) - (8,000) - - 17,953 - I 2,000 I Sales Outlets I - 303,400 (303,400) - (303,400) - - 317,566 - I 275,000 . I I -- l TOTAL )( 1,032,900 I 888,900 I 144,000 )( 72,000 I 72,000 I - )( 965,2991 821,014 J( 889,000 I 750,000 ) \ lIi4 I VI ~ 1980 CURRENT BUDGET EC'"rP\ ~ "TO;-.;;:" '; ""Mol C. -,. Va.'''.'' '\r.<f' PROGRAM l'iater & Related Land Management - Operations & Maintenance of W.C. Structures (115) PAGE 17. PURPOSE: To maintain Flood Control works established under the Authority's plan for Flood Control and Water Conservation as well as under the various Downstream Erosion Control progrnms. 1980 OBJECTIVES: - continuation of the Regular Maintenance of the Flood Control Wor~s at a level comparable with 1979 - major maintenance to be carried out at Milne Dam, Black Creck Channel - non-destructive testing of gate hoist cables at Claireville Da~ FUNDING: TIlis is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating, municipalities. FINANCIAL CO~WENTS: Funding has been allocated in order to cover a progressive maintenance progra~. including non-recurring major maintenance. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utili ties Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 72.000 60.000 - - 77.940 - - 209.940 . 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Operations & Maintenance - Water Control Structures (W5) PAGE 18. 1980 BUDGET SOUF:CES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY I I Flood Warning System 24,000 - 24,000 13,200 10,800 - 12,969 - 18,000 - C1airvi11e Dam 31,905 - 31,905 ,17,548 14,357 - 25,375 - 23,000 - : Milne Dam 5,000 - 5,000 2,750 2,250 - 4,335 - 4,000 - ; ! G. Ross Lord Dam 24,730 - 24,730 13,601 11,129 - 23,923 - 23,000 - I I 2,846 - I ! Small Dams General 4,000 - 4,000 2,200 1,800 - 3,000 - i Flood Control Channels 65,305 - 65,305 35,918 29,387 - 83,849 - 75,000 - I I I I : Erosion Control 5,000 - 5,000 2,750 2,250 - 2,241 - 4,000 - ; Major Main'tenance 50,000 - 50,000 27,500 22,500 - 26,288 - 34,000 I - i I I i : ! , i I ! i . ! j I I I I I I I ! I i I , I >' I ( TOTAL )( 209,940 I - I 209,940 )( 115,467 ] 94,473 L. - )(181,826 J - J( 184,000 I - )~ > I U1 0'1 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ECTP\/l ".-:-- "" . ,...;;. j" ~.. ~ !::::. PROGRAM Water & Related Land ~lanagement - Community Relations (Support) (WID) PAGE 19. PURPOSE: To provide a supervisory and support service staff to implement a comprehensive information, community and staff relations and outdoor and conservation program. 1980 OBJECTIVES: _ to provide information, publications, tours and official opcnings of projects, photographic coverage, movie prints of existing films and exhibits relatinE to water and land managoment aspects of the Authority program - provision has been made for the funding of a .N.E. Exhibit FUNDING: This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being a~ailable from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: I-laterial s Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Exnenses Total . $ $ $ $ $ $ $' $ 231,595 46,525 - - - - - 278,120 I 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Community Relations (Support) (WI0) PAGE 20. 1980 BUDGET SOUnCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY I CONSERVATION INFORMATION I Staff Salaries 64,600 - 64,600 35,530 29,070 - 59,209 - 57,735 - ,Staff Travel & Expenses 2,000 - 2,000 1,100 900 - 2,592 - 2,000 - i jPublications & Printing 13,325 - 13,325 7,329 5,996 - 9,187 - I 12,500 - I Tours & Special Days 3,200 - 3,200 1,760 1,440 - 3,981 - 4,015 - IphO~Ogra~hiC Supplies 3,000 - 3,000 1,650 1,350 - 1,846 - 3,250 - I Mot1on P1cture Program 3,000 - 3,000 1,650 1,350 - - - 4,000 - j Exhibi ts 20,000 - 20,000 11,000 9,000 - 10,285 - 1,000 - I Promotional Contingency 1,000 - 1,000 550 450 - 665 - 1,000 - 0 I I , I CONSERVATION EDUCATION I_ i Staff Salaries 60,500 - 60,500 33,275 27,225 - 52,946 - 53,500 - I ! Staff Travel & Expenses 1,000 - 1,000 550 450 - 256 - 1,000 - i Education Supervisors 106,495 - 106,495 58,572 47,923 - 105,074 - 99,000 - I ! i I ! ! 1 i I l TOTAL )( 278,120 -, - I 278,120 )( 152'966~25,154 I - )( 246,041 I - J( 239,000 I - )' I )0 I U1 Cl) 1980 CURRENT BUDGET EST;.fv1ATES PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Community Relations (Development) (WIO) PAGE 21. PURPOSE: To develop the facilities required for the Authority's Outdoor and Consorvation Education Programs. 1980 OBJECTIVES: - the development of trails, outdoor exhil,its and demonstrations ut the Kortrir.ht Centre for Conservation - the development of additional indoor exhibits, furnishings and oquipment for tho Kortright Centre for Conservation - to complete the construction and develo!,ment of the Lake St. George Conservation Field Centre (Stage II) FUNDING: For the development of the Kortright Centre (Area Development), 55% of the funding is from the Province of Ontario, the Balance of 45% from the General Levy (n all participating municipalities. For the Exhibit Program, $200,000 is deper.dent on funds from The :>letropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation and from Wintario, with the balance of $83,000 proposed to be spent'from the 1979 approved funding from the Foundation and Wintario. For the construction and development of La,ke St. George (Stage II), funding wlll bo obtained from the eight partici- pating school boards, by agreement. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ . $ $ l80,GOO 209,000 - - 70,000 - - 459,000 I 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Community Relations (Development) (WI0) PAGE 22. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Albion Hills C.F.C. - - - - - - 7,550 7,000 7,000 7,000 Lake St. George - Stage II 100,000 - 100,000 - - 100,000 278,958 239,382 260,722 ! 260,722 Kortright a) Area Development 76,000 - 76,000 41,800 34,200 - ) 76,000 i) I b) Exhibits, furnishihg ) 200,640 43,720 I) 216,472 ) I) and Equipment 2Sj,OOO - 28j,OOO - - 283,000 216,472 I I i I I i , . : , I j i I I [' TOTAL )( 459,000 I - I 459,000 )( 41,800 -I 34,2~J 383,000 ) ( 487,148 I 290,102 J( 560,194 I 484,194 r ~ 0\ 0 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ECT~V" ^-"... '"' , , U l,~ - ~ i.- ~ ~ It !Ioi.:.~V..... PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Taxes and Insurance (NIl ) PAGE 23. PURPOSE: To provide for costs associated with taXi)S on non-revenU0 prodllcing areas and liability inSurance on Authority lands under Water and Related Land Management Programs. FUNDING: This is a share program, 55% of the funds being available from thQ Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. FINANCIAL CO~WENTS: Using a base rate of $241.000 for 1979, an inflation figure of n has been added and an additional properties figure of 5%, bringing the estimated spending for taxes in this account for lS80 to an amount of $270,000. No allowance has been made for market value assessment increases in 1980. , OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services F::.r:ancial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes EXDtlnSeS Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - 9,500 270,000 - 279,500 , , 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Taxes and Insurance (Wl1) PAGE 24. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Taxes, non-revenue 270,000 - 270,000 148,500 121,500 - 231".324 - 189,000 - Insurance 9,500 - 9,500 5,225 4,275 - 8,816 - 9,000 - I I I I I I ; I I I i I I i I >' I ( TOTAL )( 279,500 I - I 279,500 )( 153,725 I 125,775 I - )( 240,140 I - J( 198,000 I - )~ \. ~ '" t.) 1980 CURRENT BUDGET r=r;Tlil ~ !\TC:C' ....~""""' i w.\:.,.', f_~ PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Interim Project Summary - Current & Capital PAGE 25, 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1 '379 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAl. MUNICIPAL OTHER I EXPENDITURES R!:V~NUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT lEVY W. c. Projects 122,000 - 122,000 67,100 54,900 - 90,812 ~ 92,500 - Regulations 202,900 - 202,900 111,595 91,305 - 169,380 - 182,500 - Conservation Services 259,100 62,500 196,600 108,130 88,470 - 212,134 14,979 208,000 15,000 All Benefiting 1,448,409 - 1,448,409 796,625 651,784 - 1,742,962 - 1,359,723 - Benefiting Municipalities 1,374,061 40,300 1,333,761 733,569 600,192 - 1,777,615 4,303 1,776,690 27,000 I I I I I I I I ! I I I 1 I I ! , ) ( TOTAL )(3,406,470 I 102,800 I 3,303,670 )( 1,817,019 J1,486,651 I - JC 4,012,903 I 19',282 )(3,619,413 I 42,000 ) ) .' \ 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM ' Water & Related Land Management - Interim Project Current - (W2), (W3), (W7) & (W8) PAGE 26. , PURPOSE: To provide the required funding for carrying out the objectives of the Interim Water and Related Land Management Project. 1980 OBJECTIVES: - to provide funding for the continued update of the Authority's radio system and flood warning syste~ - the administration and enforcement of water management regulation and development review function including enforcement officers' salaries and support costs - to carry out resource management practices on Authority lands and to provide Conservation Assistance Programs for private landowners FUNDING: This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: ~Iaterials Salaries Suppplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rent's Taxes Expenses Total - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 316,800 156,500 23,000 - 87,700 - - 584,000 :l" I m w )I I 0\ ~ 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTlfv1ATES PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Interim project Current - Water Control Projects (W2) PAGE 27. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING f 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Stiiff Salaries 96,000 - 96,000 ' 52,800 43,200 - 66,0';4 - 65,800 - Staff Travel 3,000 - 3,000 1,650 1,350 - 1,825 - 3,700 - Flood Control Structures - - - - - - - - - - I Safety Stations - - - - - - - - - - Milne Study - - - - - - - - - - Flood warning System Radio 3,000 - 3,000 1,650 1,350 - 15,766 - 15,000 - i Telernarks 20,000 ,- 20,000 11,000 9,000 - 7,177 - 8,000 - I Flood Control Centre - - - - - - - - - - I I , I , , I I . i I j I I I I j i ! ( TOTAL )( 122,000 I - I 122,000 )( 67,100=1 54,900 I . JC~_ ~O~~12 ] - )( 92,500 I - ) . 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Interim Project Current - Water Management Regulations (W7) , PAGE 28. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EX P EN D ITURES GRANT LEVY Staff Salaries 122,300 - 122,300 67,265 55,035 - 99,955 - 100,300 - I Staff Travel & Expenses 4,000 - 4,000 ~,200 1,800 - 1,412 - 1,500 - I Enforcement Officers Sa1. 53,900 - 53,900 29,645 24,255 - 48,915 - 48,900 - I Enforcement Officers Veh. I 12,000 - 12,000 6,600 5,400 - 15,073 - 11,500 - Legal Fees 5,700 - 5,700 3,135 2,565 - 7,426 - 4,800 - ! Technical Plans & Maps 5,000 - 5,000 2,750 2,250 - 5,349 - 3,500 - I "1' ,Organ1zat1ona Rev1ew - - - - - - 11,250 - 12,000 - , . I , I I i I ! , ! 1 , i J i I , I I ! ! I I i ! , '" I [ TOTAL )( 202,900 I - I 202,900 )( 111,595 1 91,305 I - )( 189,380 I - J( 182,500 I - ):;: iii' I 0'1 0'1 1980 CURRENT I3UDGET EST~MATES PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Interim Project - Conservation Services & Riverbank_Erooion (w)) (W8) PAGE 29. -------., 1980 BUDGET SOllRCES OF FINANCING 1979 AC'i'UALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURt:S REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES _;..~f{NJn1YI!~? __~~ANL,_ - LEVY ---- ---- -- Staff Salaries 35,000 - 35,000 19,250 15,750 - 31,350 - 31,400 - Staff Travel 2,600 - 2,600 1,430 1,170 - 1,820 - 2,000 - Plant Propagation 40,000 45,000 (5,000) (2,7501 (2,250) - 11,166 - 5,000 - Forestry Development 22,000 - 22,000 12,100 9,900 - - - I I I Private Lands I Forestry 43,500 15,000 28,500 15,675 12,825 - 36,601 11 , 668 33,000 I 12,000 j j Stream Improvement 27,000 2,000 25,000 13,750 11,250 - 27,045 2,406 28,000 2,500 Land Use Planning 5,000 500 4,500 2,475 2,025 - 13,441 905 13,600 500 I ! I AuthO~i ty Lands ; , €.6,OOO - 66,000 36,300 29,700 - 61,374 - 65,000 - 1 Forestry i Stream Improvement 10 , 000 - 10,000 5,500 4,500 - 21,005 - 20,000 - i Land Management 8,000 - 8,000 4,400 3,600 - 8,332 - 10,000 - I I I I , I I I I I ) ( TOTAL )( 259,100 I 62,500 I 196,600 )( 108,130 I 88,470 I . JC 212,13~~ I 1',979 )( 208,000 I 15,000 ) I \ 1980 CAPITAL BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Interim Project Capital PAGE 30, PURPOSE: To provide the funding required for carrying out the objectives of the Interim Water and Related Land Management Project which apply to all municipalities henefiting as well as single benefiting municipalities. 1980 OBJECTIVES: _ to continue the review and development of the Authority's Flood Control Plan _ to continue va11eyland acquisition as well as important headwater lands _ to complete construct ion of the Stouffville Channel _ to commence construction of the Oak Ridg'~s and Wilket Creek Channel Improvements _ to continue the Downstream Eros ion Control Program in the Regions of ~1etropol i tan Toronto, Peel, York and Durham FUNDING: This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities. The Interim Project as indicated encompasses both generally benefiting and specifically benefiting municipality projects. The projects are listed under the appropriate heading. The municipal share in both cases is 45% of the costs. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 416,761 451,300 - 1,111,409 843,000 - - 2,822,470 ):I I C'I ..,J >' I 0'1 co 1980 CAPITAL BUDGET ESTEV;ATES PROGRAM Water and Related Land ~lanagement - Interim Project - All Benefiting PAGE 31. 1980 BUDGET SOUnCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPErJDITURES REVENUES I EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY I Plan Review 175,000 - 175,000 96,250 78,750 - 310,953 - 372,000 - Environmental Monitoring 127,000 - 127,000 69,850 57,150 - 68,915 - 100,000 - Flood Plain Acquisition 911,409 - 911,409 501,275 410,134 - 1,197,680 - 667,273 - Headwaters Acquisition 200,000 - 200,000 110,000 90,000 - 154,523 - 200,000 - Mapping 10,000 - 10,000 5,500 4,500 - Ii - - - - Community Information. 5,000 - 5,000 2,750 2,250 - - - - - Special Studies 20,000 - 20,000 11,000 9,000 - - - - - Milne Wdrkshop - - - - - - 10,891 - 20,450 - I I I , I ( TOTAL )( 1,448,409 I - I 1,448,409 )( 796,625 ] 651,784 I - )(::.,742,962 I .., )( 1,359,723 I - ) 1980 CAPITAL B'JDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Water and Related Land Management - Interim Project - Benefiting Municipalities PAGE ~? 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL ~ REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES I IErosion Control I I ~letro 750,000 25,000 725,000 398,750 326,250 - 753,038 ) 825,000 25,000 I ! Peel 105,500 5,500 100,000 55,000 45,000 95,547 ) 101,000 1,000 i - , York 83,300 8,300 41,250 33,750 62,614 ) 75,500 500 I 75,000 - I I I ! Durham 16,500 1,500 15,000 8,250 6,750 - 16,913 ) 25,500 I 500 I ,Highland Creek (M) - - - - - - 220,638 ) 4,303 240,000 I - ; Stouffville (Y) 305,000 - 305,000 167,750 137,250 - 522,033 ) 395,000 - ;Wi1ket Creek (M) 63,761 63,761 35,069 28,692 ) 10,000 I - - - - i Oak Ridges (Y) 50,000 - 50,000 27,500 22,500 - 7,142 ) 5,000 - I I : WC-58 - Don River - - - - - - 99,690 ) I 99,690 - ! ! : I , ! i i . I : i ! i I I , : I ! , I l ( TOrAL )( 1,374,061 I 40,300 11,333,7~( 733,569 I 600, 1921--~) r;~ 777 ~~I 4,303 1~ I 27,000 ) J \. ) 1,776,690 l~ ~ -..J c 1980 CAPITAL BUDGET EST~rv!.A:rES PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Interim Project - Supplementary Project - K~atin&-C~~n~cl_ PAGE 33. PURPOSE: To provide additional funding for the protection of the Lower Don River area from flooding. 1980 OBJECTIVES: To commence the first of a seven-year dredging program of the KCilting Channel on the Lower Don River. FUNDING: This is a shared program, 55% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from thc Municj.palit)' of Metropolitan Toronto, it beiUg the designated Benefiting ~Iunicipality. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Serviccs Finai1cial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expc;1ses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - 200,000 . - 200,000 I 1980 CAPITAL BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Water and Related Land Management - Supplementary Project - Keating Channel PAGE 34. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES I EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Keating Channel Dredging 200,000 - 200,000 110,000 90,000 - - - I - - I I I I I I I I , I i I , , I I : i I I I I ; I , i I I I , i I I I I I [ TOTAL )( 200,000 I - I 200,000 )( 110,000 ] 90,000 GJ( - I - )( - I - )! .... i j!,il I -..l N 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMft:r;:;S PROGRAM Conservation and Recreation Land Management - Conservation Areas (Support) (C1) PAGE ~~I . PURPOSE: To administer and develop Authority owne,l conservation Innds in accordance with the Intorim Conservation and Recreation Land Management Plan (1979). To provide a comprehensive program of management and provision of outdoor recroation opportunities through facili ty improvements and master plann in:~ of conservation arc as . 1980 OBJECTIVES: - to finalize the Conservation and Recreation Land Management component of the Watershed Plan - - to develop detai1~d Master Plans for C,mservation Areas - to administer existing programs and ac':ivities FUNDING: This is a shared program, 50% of the funds being available fro;" the Province ,of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participati.ng municipalities. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 142,000 7,600 8,150 - 2,000 - - 159,750 . I 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Conservation and Recreation Land Management - Conservation Area (Support) (Cl) , PAGE 36, 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTIJALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Staff Salaries 139,000 - 139,000 69,500 69,500 - 126,601 - 127,260 - Staff Travel & Expenses 3,600 - 3,600 1,800 1,800 - 2,518 - 3,240 - Vehicles 7,150 - 7,150 3,575 3,575 - 6,569 - 6,500 - Pond Service - - - - - - 6,596 - 6,500 - Wildlife & Fish Habitat 10,000 - 10,000 5,000 5,000 - - - - - I , I I I , , I . I I I ! I I [ )( I '- 159,750 J( I 79,875 I J J( I >' TOTAL' 159,750 - 79,875 - )( 142,284 - 143,500 - J i. , -.I ol>o 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTi;v1f.H'ES PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Management - Conservation Areas (Develo~~nt)__(~,!l RAGE ~7. PURPOSE: To provide a wide range of outdoor recreational opportunitier. rC(juirinp, the natural resources found on Authority lands, through the provision of fad Ii til:s and ground dcvelopmcn t s j 11 Dccordanc.e with the obj ectives, policies, and concept plans of the proposed Interim Conservation and Rc('rcat.ion Land ~lanageffient component of the Watershed Plan. 1980 OBJECTIVES: - to continue the development of the Claireville Conscrvation Area including expansion of hydro and water services to 58 additional campsites and ground developments in the beach area - to continue the fish rearing program at the Glen Haffy Conservation Area - to continue ground developments at the Cold C~eek and Black Creek Conservation Areas - to improve services to the visitors at the Bruce's Mill Conservation Area through provision of additional washroom facilities - to provide funds for the ,development of additional site plans FUNDING: This is a shared program, 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating rr~nicipalities. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial, & Nages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ 35,650 54,250 5,850 - 30,750 - - 126,500 , I 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Management - Conservation Areas (Development) (Cl) PAGE 38. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Albion Hills - - - - - - 43,"349 - 40,400 - Black Creek 1,500 - 1,500 750 750 - 1,090 - 1,000 - Boyd - - - - - - - - - - Bruce I s ~lil1 25,000 - 25,000 12,500 12,500 - 7,675 - 8,600 - Claireville 79,000 - 79,000 39,500 39,500 - 2,918 - 3,300 - I Claremont - - - - - - - - - - I I Cold Creek 4,000 - 4,000 2,000 2,000 - 45,983 - 38,000 - I Glen Haffy 9,000 - 9,000 4,500 4,500 - 8,451 - 8,500 - I Greenwood - - - - - - 3,712 - 3,200 - ~ I Heart Lake - - - - - - 4,932 - 5,500 - Oak Ridges - - - - - - - - - - I Petticoat Creek - ' - - - - - 7,928 - I 8,000 - I Glen Major - - - - - - - - - - Lake St. George - - - - - - - - - - I Studies etc... 5,000 - 5,000 2,500 2,500 - 9,086 - 10,000 - I General Development 3,000 - 3,000 1,500 1,500 - - - - I - I I Milne - '" - - - - - - - ! - [ TOTAL )( 126,500 I - I l26,5~~;-'"-r~,~.1 - JC 135,124 1 - J( 126,500 I - )! V1 :=- I '-l 0'1 1980 CURRENT BUDGET v-'......-o.,.,. '"'.,,-;-:0'.... ~'" i:.~ ~ ii\tiF.~ i.::.~ .. PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Management - Conservation Areas (Proj~otn) (ell PAGE 39. PURPOSE: To undertake special projects including:- _ the i.mprovement of the cold water fish0.ry on the Duffi.n Creek in ilccord,.,nce wi th a Federal/Provincial strategic planning for Ontario Fisheries Program recommendations _ the rehabilitation of the South Thackeray Landfill Site in accordance with the approvnd plan 1980 OBJECTIVES: - to finalize the strategic planning for Ontario Fisheries Program _ to install plant material for the second year on the rehabilitation program for the Thackeray Landfill Site FUNDING: The Ministry of Natural Resources have allocated to the Authority a total of $51,000 for additional stream enhancement work to be carried out on private, public and Authority owned lands. $3,000 of this total s~~ is allocated for the 1980 Budget. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: Funding for these two programs will be carried by The Ministry of ~atural Resources and the Corporation of the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and will not reflect in the Levies or the ?rovincial Fund~ng for M.T.R.C.A. Programs. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 11 , 000 7,000 1,000 - 4,000 - - 23,000 . , , 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Management - Conservation Areas (Pro;ects) (Cl) PAGE 40. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING ( '. 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER I EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Special Projects Strategic Planning for Ontario Fisheries 3,000 3,000 - - - - I 47,570 42,171 48,000 48,000 Thackeray Landfill I Site Revegetation 20,000 20,000 - - - - 15,018 15,441 I 18,000 I 18,000 i M.O.E. Rehabilitation - - - - - - 8,738 9,200 - I - I I I I I I ; , I , I i , , ( TOTAL )( 23,000 I 23,000 I - )( - I - I - )( 71,326 I 66,812 J( 66,000 I 66,000 )! Oo,j > I ..,J co 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTiiVlt\TES PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Management - Conservation & Niagara Es~arpmont Land (C2) PAGE 41. PURPOSE: To acquire Conservation Area and Niagara Escarpment Lands as set out in the Authority's plan for ancillary conser- vation measures and Niagara Escarpment Land acquisition. The purpose of such acqulsitions is to bring into public OImership environmentally importan1: lands such as source areas, headw!ltcr zone river valleys and Oak Ridges interlobate moraine lands. 1980 OBJECTIVES: 'There is no provision in the 1980 budget estimates to acquire any land under the program. FUNDING: This is a shared program, a 50% grant on Iliagara Escarpment lands and Conservation lands is available from the Province of Ontario, the balance being funded from the General Levy on all participating municipalities or funds which may be made available through The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation or through funds raised through Authority revenues. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: Funding priorities preclude the allocation of grant aided funds to enable acqui.sitions under this program in 1980. f 1C.~O CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES """-" PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Management - Conservation & Niagara Escarpment Land (C2) PAGE 42. 1980 BUDGET SOl RCES OF FINANCING' 1979 ACTUALS ~ 1979 BUDGET " ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIA!_ MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Niagara Escarpment Land - - - - - - - - - u_u ,_ __~_~ Conservation Area Land - - - - - - 55,054 - 48,800 - I I ! , i I j I I I I ; , I I I i I . I , I I I ( TOTAL )( . I - -L - )( - ] - I - )( 55,054 1- - _J( 48,800 L - ) - ~,.- - ,~ ,. -' . \ > I co 0 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ECTF'v'I :~-;~'=~ '"-' if . 1"_ .....-.tI PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Management - Conservation Area Information & Interpretive (C3) PAGE 4~. PURPOSE: To provi de in format ion nnd i ntorprot i vo programs reInted to recroation and l:md management in tho Authority's fourteen conservation areas. 1980 OBJECTIVES: To continue the programs carried out in 1')79. FUNDING: This is a shared program, 50% of the fund, being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all parti~ipating municipalities. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utili ties Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 12,500 3.280 - - 6,900 - - 22,680 I 1980 CURRENT BJDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Manaqement - Conservation Area Information & Interpretive (C3) PAGE 44. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY i I Staff Salaries 12,500 - 12,500 6,250 6,250 - 11;100 - 11,100 - Publications & Printing 4,500 - 4,500 2,250 2,250 - 3,000 - 3,000 - i i Tours & Special Days 2,300 - 2,300 1,150 1,150 - 4,609 - 2,000 - ! Photographic Supplies 2,380 - 2,380 1,190 1,190 - 2,056 - 2,900 I - I I Motion picture Program 1,000 - 1,000 500 500 - 1,748 - 2,000 I - I I i I ! ! i I , , I i i ! I ! . . j . I ! j i I I I I I I i I I , i i I I r- TOTAL )( 22,680 I - I 22,680 )( 11,340 111,340 I - )( 22,513 I - J( 21,000 I - )b I. I ~ I (Xl IV 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIM.l~TES PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Management - Rent & Utility Servcies (C5) PAGE 45.' PURPOSE: Provision of administration of the Central Services and Stores, 1980 OBJECTIVES: - the provision of stock supplies, including purchasing and distribution - the provision of building and mechanical trades service to all Divisions of th~ Authority as required FUNDING: This is a shared program, 50% of the funds being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the Gen~ral Levy on all participating municipalities. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 40,500 - - - 2,780 - - 43,280 I 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Manaqement - Rent & Utility Services (C5) PAGE 46, f 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPEJ'6r-fURES PRg~;rNC+AL MUN~~10~L OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES , i Staff Salaries 40,500 - 40,500 20,250 20,250 - 36,375 - 35,930 I - 1 Vehicles 2,780 - 2,780 1,390 1,390 - 3,000 - 3,070- : I I I I : I I I I I I ; I i I . I I I I I I , I i l J [,,~.?TAL J( 4~~~.80 I -, I 43,280 )G,640 I 21,640 I - )( ....3:,375 I - J[ 39,000_' - ) { \ > I !Xl "'" 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Management - Taxes and Insurance (C6) PAGE 47. PURPOSE: To provide for costs associated with taxes on non--revenue producing areas and liability insurance on Authority lands and facilities under Conservation and Recreation Land ~Ianagcment Programs. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: It appears the spending for taxes in this category will be in line with the 1979 Dudget estimate of $60,000. Therefore, to arrive at a budget for 1980, a 7% inflation factor has been added and 5% for additional properties. No allowance has been made for market value assessment increases in 1980. FUNDING: This is a shared program, 50% of the fund; being available from the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the General Levy on all parti:ipating municipalities. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - 10,500 67,500 - 78,000 I 1980 CURRENT B:JDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Conservation & Recreation Land Management - Taxes and Insurance (C6) PAGE 48. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER I EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES ~EVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Taxes, non-revenue 67,500 - 67,500 33,750 33,750 - 43,235 60,000 ! - - I Insurance 10,500 - 10,000 I 5,250 5,250 - 8,608 - 10,000 I - 1 I i I I , I ~ I , ; I , ; , I i I i , I I I I , . I , i I . i t I I i I I I , ! I I i i i ! , I I I ( TOTAL )( i8,000 I - I 78,000 )( 39,000 I 39,000 I - )( 51,843 I - )[ 70,000 I - )! VI , co Cl\ 1980 CURRENT BUDGET t= ST f j. 11;\T;:: S ..." , If... _ PROGRAM Conservation and Recreation Land ~lanagement - Waterfront Programs (\'19) PAGE 49. ' PURPOSE: To provide administrative, planning and engineering staff necessary for implementing the Waterfront Project. FUNDING: This is a shared program, 50% of the runds being available from the Province or Ontario and the balance being runded rrom the General Levy on all participating municipalities. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment P"'operty & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ S $ $ $ 69.000 - - - 2,750 - . 71,750 , 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES PROGRAM Conservation and Recreation Land Management - Waterfront Programs (W9) , PAGE 50. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITUF.:::S REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY Staff Salaries 69,000 - 69,000 34,500 34,500 - 59,432 - 62,000 I Travel & Expenses 2,750 - 2,750 I L375 1,375 - 4,172 - 4,000 I j I . I I i I I I I , I 0 I i . I I i ! ! i i ! I i , ! II I ! I I L [ TOTAL )( 71,750 I - I 71,750 )~8~.1 35,875 I - JC 63,604 ,l - J( 66,000 I J~ I ~ Cl) Cl) 1980 CAPITAL BUDGET ES'-P;J1/\T~S I t' r...., -... PROGRAM Special Projects - Waterfront Plan PAGE 51. PURPOSE: The purpose of the Waterfront Plan is to create, on the Lake Ontario Shoreline within the area of the Authority's jurisdiction, a handsome waterfront balanced in its land uses which will complement adj:Jcent areas, taking cogni- zance of exist ing residential development and making availabl e, \ihe rever possibl c, features which warrant public use. 1980 OBJECTIVES: - the completion of the grading and installation of final armouring and arterial servicing as the first phase of surface development at Humber Bay West, Phase II - the continuation of the landfill project at Bluffer's Phase II and installation of servicing to the boating Federation site - the continuation of development at Humber Bay East in preparation for completion in 1981 - the continuation of 'the environmental monitoring program - the continuation of acquisition of endangered homes und construction of priority works relating to shoreline management - the continuation of the regular acquisition program - the completion of the approval process for Colonel Samuel Bois Smith Waterfront Aroa - the first phases of preparation of the in:plementation plan for Aquatic Park - the continuation of the regular maintenance program FUNDING: This is a shared program, 50% of the funds being availa~le frOm the Province of Ontario and the balance being funded from the Waterfront Capital Levy on all palticipating munlcil',iJitie~, Thi;l Govornnwnt: of CilnilJa has participated in the construction of shore protection at the Small Craft HarbGIH' at Sluffel,lp PIll'f., It ip anticipated that the Federal Assistance will continue in 1980. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: 1980 is the fourth year of the second five year proj ect for Waterfront Development and the estimates are based on anticipated cash flow from the Province of Ontario includtng $496,000 for the Suppl~mentary Waterfront Project, which would be matched by the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto as benefiting, OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATIONS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & Wages Utilities Equipment Prop.:'rty & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 80,000 - - 300,000 2,750,250 - - 3,130,250 I 1980 ,.. A,oITAL BUDGET ESTIMATES '\"r.{ , E PROGRAM Special Projects - Waterfront plan PAGE 52. 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES REVENUES NET PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL OTHER EXPENDITURES REVENUES i EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDiTURES GRANT LEVY , Humber Bay West 950,250 - 950,250 475,125 475,125 - 153,143 - I 160,000 - Humber Bay East 400,000 - 400,000 200,000 200,000 - 934,556 - I 950,000 - Western Beaches - - - - - - 5,135 - 5,000 - Ashbridge's Bay 40,000 - 40,000 20,000 20,000 I - 10,263 - 5,000 - Bluffer's - I & II 660,000 - 660,000 330,000 330,000 - 756,459 - 740,000 - East Point Park - - - - - - 34,111 - 20,000 - I Environmental Studies - I and Nonitoring 100,000 - 100,000 50,000 50,000 - 53,612 - 60,000 I - Shoreline Management 269,750 - 269,750 134,875 134,875 - 446,056 - 450,000 - i Staff Salaries 80.000 - 80,000 40,000 40,000 i - 47,395 - I 50,000 - : I Land Acquisition I , 150,000 - 150,000 75,000 75,000 - ~24,752 - 240,000 - , I Napping - - - - - - - - - - I Col. S. B. Smith 50,000 - 50,000 25,000 25,000 - 6,009 - 50,000 - Petticoat Creek - - - - - - 17,502 - 20,000 - I Maintenance 50,000 I - 50,000 25,000 25,000 - 734 - I 50,000 - i I Aquatic Park 50,000 - 50,000 I 25,000 25,000 - - - - ! - , I I , 2,800,000 - 2,800,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 - 2,789,727 - 2,800,000 i - I Levy to match expendi- i : tures and Provincial I I Grants , 1977 II (114,579) 1978 293,497 1979 6,490 ( TOTAL )( ! I )( 1,400,000 11,585,4081)( I J( I )! \tJ ~ I \D 0 1980 CAPiTAL BUDGET EST~;vJ;~:fES PROGRAM Water & Related Land Management - Waterfront Shoreline Management PAGE 53. 1 1980 BUDGET SOURCES OF FINANCING 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY NET PROVINCIAL- - MUNiCI.OALi OTHER I EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY - ----------- Shoreline Management 330,250 - 330,250 165.125 165,125 - i - - - - I , I " I I . I I , II l I ,I TOTAL _J( 330,250 I - I 330,250 )( 165,125 I 165,125 I--=-)( I )( - I - ) - - I J " \ .1980 "'l n?~""'NT BUDGET ESTIMATES Iv ',,'- :-/ Vii tu at- PROGRAM Historical Sites Development PAGE 54. PURPOSE: To carry out restoration and development work at the Black Creek Pioneer Village in accordance with approved plans. 1980 OBJECTIVES: To complete the restoration of the Richmond Hill Manse. FUNDING: The ~letropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation, Wintario and donations. FINANCIAL CO~~ENTS: Work will proceed as funds become available. OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATICNS: Materials Salaries Supplies & Real Services Financial & l'Iages Utilities Equipment Property & Rents Taxes Expenses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,000 6,000 - - 30,000 - - 46,000 ~ I \0 I-' \<. I \0 N 1980 CURRENT BUDGET ("",,('"'t'T' ~ "-r"l""'S i.:v~ ;,',\\"f- ~. ."....., - PROGRAM Historic Sites Development PAGE 55. 1980 BUDGET SOU ~CES OF F:Nf..NCING ) 1979 ACTUALS 1979 BUDGET ACTIVITY NET PROVINCIAL. MUNiCIPAL I I EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES REVENUES EXPENDITURES GRANT LEVY OTHER REVENUES EXPENDITURES REVENUES Roblin's Mill - - - - - - - ) - ) Boardwalk - - - - - - - ) - ) I Doctor' sHouse - - - - - - - ) - ) I Mennoni te Meeting Hall - - - - - - - ) - ) I Taylor Cooperage - - - - - - 11,540 ) 30,000 ) Sawyer's, House - - - - - I - II 7,245 ) 35,627 12,000 ) 70,917 I Richmond Hill Manse 46,000 - 46,000 - - 46,000 13,934 ) 18,000 ) ! , I i B.C.P.V. Visitors Centre - - - - - - - ) - ) Collection - - - - - - I. 674 r - ) I I I Wintario TME CAP 1744' - - - - - - 2~3 ) 917 ) l I ; Education Buildings - - - - - - 11,864 ) 10,000 ) , , , ! i I II . I I I I I I I i I I I I ! , I J ( TOTAL )( 46,000 I - I 46,000 )( - _I - 1 46,000 )( 45,500 I 35,627 )( 70,917 I 70,917 ) ~ A-93 , the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes ~ ~- ----- AUTHORITY MEETING FRIDAY-MAY-9-l980 .3/80 -- --- - --- --- -- -- -- ------ - Meeting 13/80 of the Authority was held on Friday, May 9, 1980, at The Regional Municipality of Peel, lO Peel Centre Drive, Brampton. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber. PRESENT WERE Chairman R. Grant Henderson Vice-Chairman Mrs. F. Gell Members W.G. Barber M.W.H. Biggar M.J. Breen S.W. Caldwell R.J. Fitzpatrick D.G. Fleet Mrs. J.A. Gardner R. Gillespie Mrs. L. Hancey Gavin Henderson W.R. Herridge, Q.C. C.W. Jessop D.J. Johnson R.W. Johnson D.W. Kitchen C.F. Kline Dr. T.H. Leith M.D. Lipton, Q.C. S.A. Macpherson Mrs. V. Marshall Mrs. S. Martin V.K. McCreary F.J. McKechnie R.A.P. Moran F.R. Perkins Mrs. N. Pownall J.S. Scott G.B. Sinclair B.V. Singh R.E. Starr, P.Eng. M.M.R. Stewart Mrs. B. Sutherland Mrs. H.D. Sutter Dr. W.M. Tovell Mrs. J. Trimmer H.G. Westney D. White R.F.M. Yuill Clarkson Gordon J. Eric Ford " " R.W. Osborne Staff K.G. Higgs W.A. McLean W.E. Jones T.E. Barber R.K. Cooper P.B. Flood M.R. Garrett Mrs. A.C. Deans J.D. Finch Ms. E.A. Freeman P.A. Head J.W. Maletich J.C. Bather A-94 -2- PRESENT WERE (Contd. ) Staff D.J. Prince Mrs. K. Conron Mrs. M. Mitchell ABSENT WE RE Members Mrs. C. Bell F.J. Brown E.H. Card D. Di Giannantonio Eldred King E.V. Kolb R. Skjarum Mrs. N. Stoner Alan Tonks Mrs. A. Walker G.A. Williams MINUTES The Minutes of Meeting #2/80 were presented. Res. #38 Moved by: R.A.P. Moran Seconded by: F.R. Perkins RESOLVED THAT: The Minutes of Meeting #2/80, as presented, be adopted as if read. CARRIEDJ ANNOUNCEMENTS The Chairman advised the members of the death, on May 8, 1980, of Mr. William C. Bryson, in his 95th year. Mr. W.C. Bryson was the father of Mr. Jesse A. Bryson, former Authority member and Chairman of the Historical Sites Advisory Board. .'es~p Rry~on j~ presently an appointee to the Cons~rvation Land Management Advisor~ Board, and has been associated with the Authority and intensely interested in its work for many years. Res. 139 Moved by: Dr. W.M. Tovell Seconded by: S.W. Caldwell RESOLVED THAT: The Chairman be requested to forward to Mr. J.A. Bryson an expression of the deep sympathy of the members on the death of his father, Mr. William C. Bryson, on May 8, 1980. CARRIEDJ TOWN OF AJAX - 25TH ANNIVERSARY The Chairman stated that the Town of Ajax is celebrating its Twenty-Fifth Anniversary in 1980, and invited Mrs. V. Marshall, Councillor, Town of Ajax, to inform the members of some of the events planned for the occasion. Mrs. Marshall advised the meeting that the Authority was assisting with the celebration of 'Ajax Day' on Saturday, May 24th at the Greenwood Conservation Area. An official tree planting ceremony will take place at ll:30 a.m. by Mr. Clark Mason, Mayor of the Town, Mr. R.G. Henderson, Authority Chairman, and others. There will be free public transportation every hour from Ajax Municipal Building to Greenwood, where admission will be free. Visitors may plant seedlings and fish in a stocked trout stream. Lunch will be available. Members of Council and Town staff will be in attendance throughout the day, and Mrs. Marshall hoped that many Authority members and staff would be present. To further commemorate the 25th Anniversary, Authority Meeting #4/80 will be held at Ajax on June 20, 1980, with the meeting commencing at lO:OO a.m. in the Council Chamber, followed by lunch and a tour of conservation lands on the lake shore throughout Ajax. FLOOD DAMAGE - PORT HOPE The Chairman commented on the extensive damage observed by himself and the Secretary-Treasurer while in the Port Hope area recently. The devastation was -3- A-95 caused by the severe flooding of March 2l-22, 1980. The Chairman noted that the flood plain of the Ganaraska River in the area has been developed almost to the edge of the banks. REPORT #2/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #2/80 of the Executive Committee. Res. '40 Moved by: M.W.H. Biggar Seconded by: Dr. T.H. Leith RESOLVED THAT: Report #2/80 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #2/80 of the Executive Committee, dated March 5, 1980. CARRIED, REPORT '3/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report '3/80 of the Executive Committee. Res. #4l Moved by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner Seconded by: M.M.R. Stewart RESOL VED THAT: Report #3/80 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #3/80 of the Executive Committee, dated March 19, 1980. CARRIED; REPORT #4/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #4/80 of the Executive Committee. Res.:.....!!! Moved by: C. F. Kline Seconded by: R.E. Starr, P.Eng. RESOLVED THAT: Report #4/80 of the Executive Committee be received 'and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #4/80 of the Executive Committee, dated April 2, 1380. CARRIEDJ GREETINGS Mr. R.F. Bean, Chairman of The Regional Municipality of Peel, brought greetings from the Municipality, and apologized for being unable to welcome members upon arrival, due to his attendance at the Official Opening of the new Canadian National terminal in Brampton. Chairman Bean welcomed all members to the new Regional Building, which had been officially opened two days previously. He invited anyone who had not had an opportunity to inspect the offices to feel free to do so, and expressed the wish that the Authority would hold future meetings at the Regional Building. Mr. Henderson thanked Mr. Bean, on behalf of Members and staff, for the hospitality of The Regional Municipality of Peel. REPORT #5/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #5/80 of the Executive Committee, which was dealt with by separate resolutions. Item 1, Section I Watershed Plan The Chairman called upon Mr. K.G. Higgs to introduce the Watershed Plan. Mr. Higgs advised the members that the Watershed Plan is the most important item to be dealt with by the Authority in 1980, and it will continue to be of importance in the operation of the Authority for the next twenty years. Watershed planning is not new to conservation authorities who have been involved in such planning since the pas,sage of The Conservation Authorities Act in 1946. The first 'Watershed Plan' of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority was the Plan for Flood Control and Water Conservation adopted by the Authority on September 2, 19 59, and prepared under the guidance and direction of Dr. G. Ross Lord, then Chairman of the Authority. The Plan for Flood Control and A-96 -4- its policies and programmes have been in operation since 1959, and form the basis of much that the Authority has accomplished in the last twenty-one'years. When the Authority was designated implementing agency for the Waterfront Plan, a ten-year plan was prepared which will be completed by the end of 1981. Under The Conservation Authorities Act, one of the main mandates of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is responsibility for the' preparation of a plan to manage the natural resources of the area over which it has jurisdiction. Presentation of the Watershed Plan will be made to member municipalities, and it is hoped that Authority members will promote adoption of the Plan. Presentation of the Watershed Plan Mr. W.A. McLean, Director of Planning and Policy, presented the Watershed Plan, with accompanying film and slides: " INTRODUCTION Since l878, there have been at least 32 hurricane-spawned storms over Ontario. The Metropolitan Toronto region suffers damaging floods, on the average, once every l-l/3 years, due to heavy summer thunderstorms or from combined rain, melting snow and ice jams in the spring of the year. On October 14 and l5, 19 54 , Hurricane Hazel, the worst tropical storm in recorded history to pass over southern Ontario, drenched the watersheds of the region, causing disastrous floods, destroying bridges and roads, and sweeping away homes. The appalling toll included eighty-one lost lives, suffering for hundreds, and more than l,800 homeless families. In 1980 dollars, the loss was $l50,000,OOO.00. Since 1946, the provincial Conservation Authorities Act has enabled the formation of Conservation Authorities to implement programs to conserve, restore, develop and manage renewable natural resources on a watershed basis. Since 1957, The Nt!tl:Opul:.i.l.i:111 Toronto and Region Conservation Autho"ity has responded to the resource management needs of its watershed community. The Authority's primary responsibility has been to provide flood control and water management measures to protect its community from loss of life and damage to property. To accomplish this objective, protective measures have been constructed, vulnerable lands acquired, and development proposals reviewed and regulated. As a resul t, the threat to life and property from flood and erosion hazard has been substantially reduced, both along the river valleys and, since the early 1970's, on the Lake Ontario waterfront. Landowners have also been given advice and assist- ance in good conservation land management practices. Additional benefits have accrued to the community as a result of Authority programs, Lands acquired for conservation purposes have provided opportunities for public recreation, outdoor and conservation education, and appreciation of the significant heritage resources of the region. Marshes and wetlands have been retained and provide valuable habitat. Lands susceptible to erosion have been enhanced and protected through extensive reforestation. Since the early 1970's, the Authority has also been responsible for the implementation of a waterfront plan for the Lake Ontario shoreline, providing lakeshore recreation areas for the region. Community interests and resource management requirements have evolved since 1957. The Authority, through its programs and policies, has responded to these changes and has recognized the need to review and evaluate its resource management policies and programs. Preparation of a comprehensive review and management state- ment was begun in 1975. In keeping with the need for review, the Province of Ontario, in 1977, directed the Conservation Authority to study and investigate the'watershed and prepare and file, with its member municipalities and the Minister of Natural Resources, a Watershed Plan. The Watershed Plan comprises ten interrelated programs for the watershed area. . -5- A-97 FLOOD CONTROL Flood Control Policy Proposed The Authority's goal is: "To undertake a comprehensive program of flood control designed to prevent, eliminate, or reduce the risk of hazard to life and property, while cognizant of the natural attributes of the valley system. " The eight objectives set forth by the Authority in its flood control program include: .site specific protection to reduce the risk of flooding at "flood damage centres" to less than 50% over an assumed structure life of lOO yearsJ .acquisition of lands susceptible to floodingJ .maintenance of a flood warning and forecasting systemJ .application of regulations to control filling in valleys, construction in flood-vulnerable areas, and alterations in water coursesJ .municipal co-operation to ensure that any development recognizes the Authority's flood control objectives; .provision of information to municipalities for flood hazard areasJ .recognition of the natural valley system in design and construction of protective worksJ .maintenance of an up-to-date data gathering system. For its review or d~velopmel1t propo~a18, t.he Authority has formulated operational criteria for undeveloped and developed flood plains. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Urban and Rural A New Emphasis on Water Quality "The goal of the Erosion and Sediment Control Program is to minimize the hazards of erosion to life and property, and to improve the quality of the streams and lakes through selective controls on sediment sources." The Erosion and Sediment Control Program is composed of two major components: prevention and protection. A number of criteria will be instituted to minimize erosion and sediment related problems. Among them are: .buildings or structures will not be permitted in erosion impact zones unless studies show that they will be safe during their life and that they will not aggravate or create erosion problems; .surface drainage from buildings or structures should not be permitted to be discharged over the valley wall; .municipalities will be encouraged to maximize on-site sediment control during construction; .the Authority will endeavour to increase public awareness of the problems of erosion control and sediment reduction. The Authority will be guided by certain operational criteria in the protection component of its program. They include: A-98 -6- . .undertaking erosion protection works along watercourses draining an area equal to, or greater than, l,300 hectares. Drainage areas of less than l,300 hectares will be the responsibility of the municipalitYJ .in assessing the severity of an erosion or sediment problem, a priority or ranking, which will be reviewed annually, will be given each siteJ .in the design of all protection works, the Authority shall be cognizant of the natural surroundings and shall endeavour to provide ancillary benefitsJ .an "Environmental Inventory" shall be undertaken prior to initiation of any work s , in order to minimize the impact on valley ecosystems. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Detaining Runoff Gets New Emphasis "It is the goal of the Authority to promote sound storm water management practices which will ensure adequate flood and erosion protection and will enhance the environmental, aesthetic and recreational potential of urban watercourses." Urban development can increase runoff rates and volumesJ increase erosionJ and/or reduce base flow affecting water quality, vegetation and water supply. The Authority's objectives are: .to encourage establishment and implementation of storm water management policies at the various appropriate levels of the municipal planning processJ .to assist municipalities in establishing master drainage plans and to integrate municipal master drainage plans with ongoing flood plain management and erosion control programs; .to ensure that all drainage planning is on a minor/major system basis, with the minor system carrying up to the 2-year storm and the major system carrying the regional or 10Q-year storm, whichever is greaterJ .to employ natural drainage channels as much as possible. The Authority urges the Province of Ontario to take a leading role in encouraging municipalities to prepare and adopt master drainage plans and to consider provid- ing financial assistance for preparation of master drainage plans. As part of this program, the Authority will work with the regional and local municipalities in preparing storm water management policies. CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT Authority Provides Expertise "The goal of the Conservation Land Management Program is to contribute to the quality of land and water resources through a comprehensive program of conservation land management, including forest management, wildlife habitat improvement, stream improvement, source area protection and conservation land planning." Rapid urbanization of this portion of the Province is the most immediate problem confronting land management practices. The Authority's objectives for conservation land management are: .to provide technical assistance and advice services to private land- owners and public agencies; .to co-operate with municipalities and other agencies in reducing erosion and sedimentationJ .to assist municipal and public agencies to identify, protect, and conserve sensitive areas in the valley systems and the headwater regionsJ -7- A-99 .to carry out a program of vegetation management on urban and rural lands: .to enhance fisheries habitat through stream improvementJ .to lease lands to private and public agencies for agricultural and recreational purposes. In implementing such works, the Authority will work with public and private land- owners on the basis of requests for assistance. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT Reduce Hazards in Waterfront Areas "The Shoreline Management Program goal is to undertake a comprehensive program of shoreline management designed to prevent, eliminate, or reduce the risk of hazard to life and property, while cognizant of the natural attributes of the lake front setting." The Shoreline Management Program is composed of two major components, prevention and protection. The prevention component, through development control, requires recognition of shoreline hazards in establishing setbacks for development or redevelopment. Shoreline protection will be carried out on the basis of technical priorities, within limits of funding and site access availability. Sites of highest priority are, generally, located in Scarborough. Certain criteria will be used as a guide for the Authority in implementing the protection component of the program, including: .emphasis on control of erosion due to wave action: .8:'.OL<:: pLCJt.E:'ction on a design block basis, i. e, shoreline segments with physical characteristics which permit protection as a unitJ .where private property is involved, the owner will be required to deed the necessary land to the Authority for a nominal sum: .the Authority will assist in developing technology and distributing information to aid property owners in limiting bank erosion after toe protection is installed. LAND ACQUISITION Program Encourages Wise Public Use "The goal of the Acquisition Program is to acquire hazard and conservation land in order to protect it against unwise land use which would affect the ability of the land to perform its natural functions and to conserve significant and sensitive land for the benefit of the people of the region." The program recognizes the suitability for acquisition of both hazard lands and conservation lands. Hazard lands are lands susceptible to specific risk, including: .lands defined by the flood plain of the Regional Storm which drain in excess of l,300 hectaresJ .lands along the waterfront defined by the lOO-year flood level plus wave uprush: .lands which, due to hazards of unstable slopes or soils, make them undevelopable or untenable if already developed. Conservation lands are significant or sensitive areas requiring public protection in order to retain their natural character and/or water-related function, including: A-lOO -8- .significant valley and waterfront lands which generally lie between the flood limit and top of bank: .lands which are environmentally sensitive, that abut or lie within a valley, the waterfront or are part of a headwater zone. WATERSHED RECREATION Public Benefits from Conservation Measures "The Watershed Recreation Program's goal is to continue to provide opportunities for public access to Authority lands, where the public can engage in outdoor activities requiring a natural setting and acquire an appreciation of the region's resources through recreation." The Authority will continue to provide public outdoor recreation opportunities on the lands it acquires for resource management. The Authority's objectives will be to: .designate tracts of land for outdoor recreational purposes compatible with other resource management goals: .manage all recreation land and facilities to ensure the continuance of a recreation resource: .make Authority lands available to the Authority's member municipalities, primarily within urban areas, for open space purposes consistent with the Authority's water management objectives. For purposes of the program, the Authority will designate its lands as: Conservation Areas, Forest and Wildlife Areas, lands suitable for lease by other agencies, or resource management tracts. WATERFRONT DEVELOPMFNT Lakefront for Public Use "The goal of the Waterfront.Development Program is to create a hand- some waterfront, balanced in its land uses, which will complement adjacent areas, taking cognizance of existing residential develop- ment and making accessible, wherever possible, features which warrant public use." To achieve its goal, the Authority has established a number of objectives: .to create open space areas across the waterfront which provide for a range of active and passive water-orientated activities for people of the region: .to encourage linking of waterfront open space corridors with those of the river valleys: .to develop diverse sport fishing through habitat improvement and improved access in conjunction with the Ministry of Natural Resources' fish stocking program: .to provide small craft safe anchorage at intervals along the shoreline, as well as day and seasonal mooring facilities: .to encourage preservation of the remaining lower valley marsh areas by discouraging intensive recreational uses: .to augment knowledge of lake processes by furtner research, data collection and analysis: .to co-operate with all agencies concerned with improving the water quality of Lake Ontario. -9- A-lOl HERITAGE CONSERVATION Black Creek Pioneer Village Visited By 300,000 Ann~ally "The Authority's goal is to protect the heritage conservation resources which occur on its lands where such resources are shown to be of regional significance: and to restore and interpret to the public the historical importance of selected heritage conservation resources." The major heritage resource project has been Black Creek Pioneer Village. The objectives of the Authority's Heritage Conservation Program include: .continued development of Black Creek Pioneer Village to demonstrate early Central Ontario social, economic and political life and its relationship to resources: .continued use of the Village as an educational resource to the school system; .the phased construction of a Visitors' Centre to provide for necessary services and visitor accommodation. COMMUNITY RELATIONS Public understanding Vital "The goals of the Community Relations Program are to communicate Authority goals, objectives and programs to watershed residents, report on achievements through public support, create awareness of the importance of the watershed concept of conservation and engender a positive attitude toward the Authority and its program." The support and participation of the watershed community is essential to success- fully achieve the Authority's resource management objectives. The objectives of the program are: .to continue and expand communication with special audiences affected by Authority resource management programs: .to develop a marketing strategy to encourage use of facilities; .to include opportunities for learning as an integral part of all programs and facilities: .to co-operate with, and expand opportunities for educational institutions in providing outdoor learning opportunities, both through field centres and the Kortright Centre for Conservation. CONCLUSION In preparing the Watershed Plan, the Authority carried out extensive reviews and studies. Reports and historical data were examined, and inventories, surveys and modelling studies were carried out. Through the Plan preparation process, the Authority has made an effort to involve and gain input from its watershed community by holding public seminars, reviewing proposals with representatives of various governments on its advisory boards, and circulating policy and program proposals to its member municipalities and to the Province for comment. The Authority established an interagency technical task force of municipal and provincial planning and engineering staff. These communication and public participation steps are essential in defining the Authority's role within the watershed. The ten interrelated programs, in combination, fulfill the Authority's overall goal: "to establish and undertake, in the area over which it has jurisdiction, a program designed to further the conservation, restoration, develop- ment and management of renewable natural resources. .. A-l02 -10- No program, by itself, is "whole" and each is complementary to the others. Estimated annual cost of the Watershed Plan, expressed in 1980 dollars, is $14,435,000. The Watershed Plan is a guide to resource management. It has the flexibility to respond to changing priorities and is designed for continued updating. It is an action plan, and from it will flow the projects by which the Authority will carry out its work." Appreciation was expressed to Mr. McLean and other staff members involved in the preparation and presentation of the Watershed Plan. Res. #43 Moved by: Mrs. H.D. Sutter Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Item 1, Section I of Report #5/80 of the Executive Committee be received: and THAT the Watershed Plan, as amended and appended as Schedule "A" of the Minutes of Executive Committee Meeting #5/80, held Wednesday, April 16, 1980, be received and endorsed: AND FURTHER THAT the Watershed Plan be circulated to the Ministry of Natural Resources, to the Authority's member municipalities, and to the area municipalities, for their comment and endorsement. CARRIED: Item 2, Section I Report #2/80 - Finance Sub-Committee The Chairman of the Finance Sub-Committee introduced Messrs. J. Eric Ford and R.W. Osborne of Clarkson Gordon, and invited Mr. Osborne to present the Audi tors' Report and Financial Statement to December 31, 1979. Res. '44 Moved by: J.S. Scott Seconded by: Dr. W.M. Tovell RESOLVED THAT: Item 2, Section I of Report #5/80 of the Executive Committee be received; and THAT the recommendations contained therein and set forth herein be adopted: U The 1979 Auditors' Report and Financial Statement to December 31, 1979, be approved and signed by the Chairman and Secretary-Treasurer of the Authority: '2 The 1979 operating deficit in the amount of $43,857.00 as at December 31, 1979, be financed from the 1980 Operations Budget of the Authority: '3 A sincere vote of thanks be extended to the Auditors for the present- ation of their report. CARRIED; SECTION II Res. 4145 Moved by: C.F. Kline Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report 415/80 be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #5/80 of the Executive Committee, pages B-76 - B-85 inclusive, dated April 16, 1980. CARRIED: REPORT #6/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #6/80 of the Executive Committee, which was dealt with by separate resolutions: -11- A-103 Item 1, Section I The Board of Trade of Metropolitan Toronto -Renewal of Lease Res. #46 Moved by: Dr. T.H. Leith Seconded by: S.W. Caldwell RESOLVED THAT: Item 1, Section I of Report #6/80 of the Executive Committee be received: and the recommendations contained therein and set forth herein be adopted: Subject to an Order-in-Council being issued in accordance with section 20 (c) of The Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1970, Chapter 78, the Authority lease to The Board of Trade of Metropolitan Toronto 23.819 acres of vacant land, being Part of Lots 8 and 9, Concession VII, Town of Vaughan. Said lease is to be prepared on the following basis: (a) The initial rental rate to be $7,200.00 per annum payable $600.00 monthly in advance, plus payment of all realty taxes and local improvement charges. The rental rate is to be renegotiated at five-year intervals: (b) The term is to be 25 years, commencing on or before January 1, 1982: (c) Provision to be included in the lease to indicate that the use shall be for golf course purposes: (d) provision be included in the lease to provide that the work of restoring the demised premises following any necessary work per- formed by the Authority will be at the expense of the Board of Trade, it being noted that any damages caused by the negligence of the Authority should be paid by the Authority: (e) Provision be included in the lease to the effect that the Authority is not to be liable for any damage caused to the lands or improvements by I.'l:!CiSOIl of G.vodil1g; (f) The existing lease contains a clause allowing the Lessee to con- struct a bridge crossing the Humber River for use as part of the golf course at a specifically defined location. It is proposed that, in the new lease, there will be no reference made to the location of the bridge, but rather that it be stated that it be a mutually acceptable design; (g) The reference to the village of Woodbridge and/or the Township of Vaughan should now be amended to indicate the Town of Vaughan and The Regional Municipality of York; (h) A clause be included providing the Board of Trade to indemnify the Authority against any mechanic's liens that may be registered against the property as a result of any improvements to the demised premises made by the Board of Trade; (i) The clause in the existing lease pertaining to rights of the Authority to enter the property be expanded to reserve the Authority the right to enter the property to carry out and maintain any additional flood control works required: (j) The clause in the existing lease pertaining to the requirement of the Board of Trade to obtain prior written approval of the Authority for plans of development involving change of topography, etc. be expanded to include that all proposed development must be in accord- ance with the existing Authority criteria for flood plain management; (k) The clause in the existing lease pertaining to the disposition of improvements at termination be amended to provide for all improve- ments on the lands at date of termination reverting to the Authority at no cost to the Authority: (1) All other terms and conditions included in lease dated June 27, 1966, which have not been amended by the aforementioned terms, with the exception of the renewal clause, are to be included; A-l04 -12- -AND THAT the Authority's solicitor be directed to prepare a lease agreement using the above as a basis and to include any other terms and conditions as are considered necessary in the interests of the Authority; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED: SECTION II Res. 4147 Moved by: S.A. Macpherson Seconded by: M.W.H. Biggar RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #6/80 be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #6/80 of the Executive Committee, pages B-8B - B-117 inclusive, da ted Apr i1 30, 1980. CARRIED; NEW BUSINESS Motion Moved by: R.F.M. Yuill Seconded by: S.A. Macpherson RESOL VED THAT: Item 8, Section II of Report 416/80 of the Executive Committee be referred back to the Committee for further consideration. ON A SHOW OF HANDS, THE MOTION WAS __________________________________ NOT CARRIED: Honour Roll Awards MRS. GARDNER advised that the Honour Roll Awards tree planting ceremonies will take place on May 23 commencing at 2:00 p.m., and urged all members to make a special effort to attend in order to make the occasion the happier for those listed for award. Watershed Plan - Adoption by Authority MRS. TRIMMER asked if the Watershed Plan would be brought back to the Authority following presentation to the member municipalities. She was informed that the Plan will be presented to the Authority at its meeting scheduled for October 10, 1980. Comments of municipalities will be identified and staff recommendations presented at that time. Watershed Plan Highlights MR. McLEAN advised that a very large quantity of the above brochure had been ordered and requested that members take a supply for distribution in their municipalities. Res. #48 Moved by: Dr. T.H. Leith Seconded by: F.R. Perkins RESOLVED THAT: The members of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority commend all staff involved in the preparation of the Watershed Plan for their parts in the accomplishment of this great undertaking. CARRIED; Use of Regional Facilities Res. #49 Moved by: Gavin Henderson Seconded by: F.J. McKechnie RESOLVED THAT: A vote of thanks be forwarded to The Regional Municipality of Peel for permitting the use of its facilities for Meeting #3/80 of the Authority. CARRIED; ADJOURNMENT On Motion, the meeting adjourned at 4:10 p.m., May 9. R. Grant Henderson K.G. Higgs Chairman Secretary-Treasurer KC. ~ A-IDS , the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes ------- ----- AUTHORITY MEETING #4/BO FRIDAY-JUNE-20-19BO t4/80 Meet~ng #4/80 of the Authority was held on Friday, June 20, 1980, at the Town of~~ Ajax Municipal Office, 65 Harwood Avenue, Ajax, Ontario. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber. PRESENT WERE Chairman R. Grant Henderson Vice-Chairman Mrs. F. Gell Members W.G. Barber M.W.H. Biggar M.J. Breen F.J. Brown S.W. Caldwell E.H. Card D.G. Fleet Mrs. J.A. Gardner Mrs. L. Hancey Gavin Henderson W.R. Herridge, Q.C. C.W. Jessop D.J. Johnson R.W. Johnson D.W. Kitchen E.V. Ko1b Dr. T.H. Leith Mrs. V. Marshall F.J. McKechnie R.A.P. Moran F.R. Perkins J.S. Scott G.B. Sinclair R.E. Starr Mrs. H.D. Sutter Dr. W.M. Tove1l Mrs. J. Trinuner H.G. Westney R.F.M. Yu i 11 Clerk, Town of Ajax A.J. Hodges Treasurer, Town of Ajax H.E. Irwin Administrator, Town of Ajax D.J. Low Dept. Clerk, Town of Ajax R. Parisotto Authority Staff K.G. Higgs W.E. Jones T.E. Barber R.K. Cooper P.B. Flood J.W. Maletich D.J. Prince Mrs. K. Conron Mrs. M. Mitchell ABSENT WERE Members Mrs. C. Bell D. Di Giannantonio R.J. Fitzpatrick R. Gillespie Eldred King C.F. Kline M.D. Lipton, Q.C. S.A. Macpherson Mrs. s. Martin V.K. McCreary Mrs. N. Pownall B.V. singh A-l06 -2- ABSENT WERE R. Skjarum M.M.R. Stewart Mrs. N. Stoner Mrs. B. Sutherland Alan Tonks Mrs. A. Walker D. White G.A. Williams MINUTES The Minutes of Meeting #3/80 were presented. Res. #50 Moved by: Dr. T.H. Leith Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: The Minutes of Meeting #3/BO, as presented, be adopted as if read. CARRIED: GREETINGS Councillor Valerie Marshall brought greetings from the Town of Ajax: "Mr. Chairman, Ladles and Gentlemen: It is a great pleasure to welcome you this morning to the Town of Ajax. Unfortunately, Mayor Clark Mason and Regional Councillor Bill McLean could not be present, but Henry Westney is here, and Owen Ashley - who is retiring with over 20 years of service. I have three partlGillar reasons today for welcoming you to the Town. This is a very ex~iting year for us all. We are celebrating our 25th Anniversary, an immensely historic occasion to us. The site was once the biggest shell-filling plant during World War II. It took its name from H.M.S. AJAX which fought so gallan~ly d~rin~ the war. Many of our strc=tc are r.~med f:; r :":'.::: :.~= .:1"".ipc c:"lgaged in the battle of the River Plate. The sec~nd reason i~ that this i:: th:: lat.~ Anniversary of ~ome Week, which will be celebrated all week. Thirdly, and most importantly to the Conservation Authority, we fe~l we have a magnificent lake shore in Ajax, about 100% in public ownership, thanks to the Authority: also, the Duffin and Carruthers Creeks and Paulynn Park. We feel we have a very precious link with the Authority. Welcome to Ajaxl We are very glad you are here." The Chairman thanKed Councillor Marshall: "On this auspicious occasion for the Town of Ajax, the Authority wishes to present a lasting reminder of its pleasure in participating in the 25th Anniversary celebrations. This picture is of the Greenwood Area, and we hope it will find a place here on your '.<Ialls." Councillor Marshall expressed appreciation of the gift on behalf of the Mayor, members of Council, and citizens of the Town. The Chairman announced that the Conservation Authority had also brought a tree to be planted in the Municipal Office grounds. This event was to take place following adjournment, and the Chairman aSKed Councillor Henry G. Westney to officiate. REPORT #7/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #7/80 of the Executive Committee, which was dealt with by separate resolutions. Item 1, Section I The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation -Appointment of New Member Res. #51 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Item 1, Section I of Report #7/80 of the EKecutive Committee be received: and THAT the recommendation as contained therein and set forth herein be adopted: -3- A-l07 RESOLVED THAT: Mr. H.H. Clare, Environmental Protection Co-ordinator, Imperial Oil Limited, be invited to become a member of The ~1etropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation for a three-year period, commencing May 8, 1980.. CARRIED: Section II Res. #52 Moved by: F.R. Perkins Seconded by: Dr. W.M. Tovell RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #7/80 be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #7/80 of the Executive Committee, pages B-119 - B-163 inclusive, dated May 14, 1980. CARRIED: REPORT #8/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #B/BO of the Executive Committee, which was dealt with by separate resolutions. Item 1, Section I Information and Education Division Lake St. George Conservation Field Centre -19BO Budget Revisions: Water & Related Land Management - Community Relations (Development) (WlO) Res. 153 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: Dr. T.H. Leith RESOLVED THAT: Item 1, Section I of Report #8/BO of the Executive Committee be received: and THAT the 19BO Budget Revisions to Water and Related Land Management - Community Relations (Development) (W10), for the Lake St. George Conservation Field Centre, be included in the 1980 Budget Estimates of the Authority. CARRIED: -. Item 2, Section I Kortright Centre for Conservation -1980 Budget Revisions: Water & Related Land Management - Community Relations (Development) (WIO) Res. 154 Moved by: M.W.H. Biggar Seconded by: Dr. T.H. Leith RESOLVED THAT: Item 2, Section I of Report 18/80 of the Executive Committee be received; and THAT the 1980 Budget Revisions to Water and Related Land Management - Community Relations (Development) (WIO), for the Kortright Centre for Conservation, be included in the 1980 Budget Estimates of the Authority. CARRIED; It was reported that the Authority had made a request for a Wintario non-capital project grant for the Kortright Centre for Conservation for indoor and outdoor displays, and for audio-visual, building, public programme and food service equipment, at a total project cost of $360,044.00. A Wintario grant of $180,022.00 was requested: the remaining 50% had already been raised from private donors by The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation. Approval of the application has not been received and, in view of the urgency of obtaining funding for this project, it was agreed tha t the following action be taken: Res. #55 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: Mrs. H.D. Sutter RESOLVED THAT: Mr. R.G. Henderson, Chairman, Mrs. Florence Gell, Vice-Chairman, and Mr. F.J. Brown, Member, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; and Mr. E.H. Card, Chairman, The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation, be appointed a delegation to make a presentation to the Premier of Ontario concerning the Authority's applicati.on for a Wintario Non-Capital Project Grant for the Kortright Centre for Conservation for indoor and outdoor displays, and for audio-visual, building, public programme and food service equipment, in the amount of $180,022.00. CARRIED: A-lOB -4- Section II Res. #56 Moved by: M.J. Breen Seconded by: R.E. Starr:, P.Eng. RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #B/80 be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #B/BO of the Executive Committee, pages B-165 - B-176 inclusive, dated May 28, 1980. CARRIED: REPORT #9/BO OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #9/80 of the Executive Committee, which was dealt with by separate resolutions. Item 1, Section I Budget Revision -Conservation & Recreation Land Management: Conservation Areas (projects) (Cl) Strategic Planning for Ontario Fisheries (S.P.O.F.) Res. #57 Moved by: M.W.H. Biggar Seconded by: F.J. McKechnie RESOLVED THAT: Item 1, Section I of Report #9/80 of the Executive Committee be received: and THAT Conservation and Recreation Land Management - Conservation Areas (Project) (Cl) of the 19BO budget be amended to include $34,500.00, totalling $57,500.00: and that $2,000.00 be included in the 19B1 budget. CARRIED: Item 2, Section I Basis of Reduction Subsidy Res. #58 Moved by: F.J. McKechnie ~econdpn ny. Mrs. L. Hancey RESOLVED THAT: In accordance with instructions received from the Director of the Conservation Authorities and Water Management Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources, the provincial reduction subsidy be recalculated, the net result being an increase of reduction subsidy from $6,152.00 to $21,623.00: and THAT a budget adjustment be effected and the increased reduction subsidy be credited or refunded to the municipalities on receipt of same from the Province of Ontario. CARRIED; Section II MTRCA - Reappointment of Member The Chairman and Members congratulated Mr. Spencer W. Caldwell upon his re-appointment to The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority effective July 17, 19BO to the first meeting of the Authority in 1983. Watershed Plan Presentations Res. #59 Moved by: Mrs. J. Trimmer Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Suitable arrangements be made for joint presentation of the Watershed Plan to representatives of the Federal Government and the International Joint Commission in Ottawa. CARRIED: Res. #60 ~oved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #9/80 be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #9/BO of the Executive Committee, pages B-178 - B-194 inclusive, dated June 11, 1980. CARRIED: -5- A-l09 NEW BUSINESS Keating Channel There was discussion regarding the position of the Authority in the matter of the Keating Channel. Re s . .JL~J:. Moved by: Mrs. J. Trimmer Seconded by: Dr. W.M. Tovell RESOLVED THAT: The staff be requested to prepare a status report concerning the dredging of the Keating Channel. CARRIED: The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority -Terms of Reference of Advisory Boards Motion: Moved by: D.G. Fleet Seconded by: W.R. Herridge, Q.C. RESOLVED THAT: A committee be appointed to review the Regulation dealing with the purpose and terms of reference of the advisory boards of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and the composition of the Executive Committee. THE MOTION WAS ------------------------------------------------------NOT CARRIED: Finch Avenue Extension -Proposed Route Motion: Moved by: F.J. McKechnie Seconded by: R.E. Starr, P.Eng. RESOLVED THAT: Subject to confirmation that an Environmental Assessment Board hearing is required, the staff be requested to report to the Executive Committee on ~he damage that 'may be done to the Indian Line Campg:&.V""l~ Uj ...I.d tJ...vtlv~",J route of the Finch Avenue Extension, and any haUll wh..i.dl nl.L':Ihl be c.:auseu. u.Y hlV'vil&':f ...he route to the east. THE MOTION WAS ---------------------------------------~--------------NOT CARRIED: ADJOURNMENT On Motion, the meeting adjourned at 12:10 p.m., June 20. R. Grant Henderson K.G. Higgs Chairman Secretary-Treasurer . ... KC. ~ A-110 , the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes AUTHORITY MEETING #5/80 FRIDAY-OCTOBER-IO-19BO #5/80 Meeting #5/BO of the Authority was held on Friday, October 10, 1980, at the Kortright Centre for Conservation, Pine Valley Drive, Woodbridge, Ontario. The meeting was called to order at 1:30 p.m. in the Theatre. PRESENT WERE Chairman R. Grant Henderson Vice-Chairman Mrs. F. Gell Members M.W.H. Biggar M.J. Breen S.W. Caldwell R.J. Fitzpatrick D.G. Fleet Mrs. J.A. Gardner R. Gillespie Mrs. L. Hancey Gavin Henderson W.R. Herridge, Q.C. C.W. Jessop R.W. Johnson C.F. Kline Dr. T.H. Leith M.D. Lipton, Q.C. S.A. Macpherson Mrs. V.A. Marshall V.K. McCreary F.J. McKechnie R.A.P. Moran F. R. Perkins Mrs. N. Pownall J.S. Scott G.B. Sinclair M.M.R. Stewart Mrs. H.D. Sutter Dr. W.M. Tovell Mrs. J. Trimmer H.G. Westney R.F.M. Yuill Guest F.L. Lunn B. Harper Bull Conservation Fellowship Award Recipients Miss D. Paterson Miss K. Suboch Miss N.C. Weeks Authority Staff K.G. Higgs W.A. McLean W.E. Jones T.E. Barber R.K. Cooper P.B. Flood M.R. Garrett Mrs. K. Conron Mrs. A.C. Deans B.E. Denney J.D. Finch Miss A. Ha yhoe J.W. Maletich D.J. Prince Mrs. M. Pudney ABSENT WERE Members W.G. Barber Mrs. C. Bell F.J. Brown A-Ill -2- ABSENT WERE (Contd.) Members E.H. Card D. DiGiannantonio D.J. Johnson Eldred King D.W. Kitchen E.V. Kolb Mrs. S. Martin B.V. Singh R. Skjarum R.E. Starr Mrs. N. Stoner Mrs. B. Sutherland Alan Tonks Mrs. A. Walker D. White G.A. Williams MINUTES The Minutes of Meeting #4/80 were presented. Res. #62 Moved by: R.F.M. Yuill Seconded by: F.R. Perkins RESOLVED THAT: The Minutes of Meeting #4/BO, as presented, be adopted as if read. CARRIED: The Chairman welcomed the Members to the Kortright Centre for Conservation, and requested that Mr. W.A. McLean comment on presentation of the Watershed Plan to the municipalities. Mr. McLean advised that the presentation, comprising descriptive material and slides, was made by staff, Executive Committee and Authority Members, to all Regional Municipalities, Metropolitan Toronto, and the majority of area municipalities -- usually following Council meetings and thus ensuring a good representation of Councillors and senior officials. Following study by various committees and processing through Councils, the staff is now receiving comments from the municipalities. The Plan has been very well received and generally endorsed. The comments will be assembled, and the staff will report on recommended amendments to a meeting of the Authority to be held in December, 1980. B. HARPER BULL CONSERVATION FELLOWSHIP AWARDS -- 1980 The Chairman requested that Dr. T.H. Leith introduce the three recipients of the 1980 B. Harper Bull Conservation Fellowship Award: Miss D.L.G. Paterson, University of Waterloo Major Course of Study: Geography - Resource Management Miss K.A. Suboch, University of Waterloo Major Course of Study: Environmental Studies - Man Environment Miss N.C. Weeks, Osgoode Hall, York University Major Course of Study: Environmental Law Dr. Leith stated that he had had the pleasant, but difficult and lengthy task of selecting the successful candidates for the Awards from the many applications received. The calibre of candidate is probably the highest yet encountered, and the Committee was impressed with the degree of dedication to conservation evident among the applicants. Mr. F.L. Lunn presented the awards on behalf of Mrs. Kathleen Bull. -3- A-1l2 REPORT #10/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Report #10/80 of the Executive Committee was presented. Res. #63 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: s.w. Caldwell RESOLVED THAT: Report #lO/BO of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #10/80 of the Executive Committee, dated June 25, 1980. CARRIED: REPORT #ll/BO OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Report #ll/BO of the Executive Committee was presented. Res. #64 Moved by: C.F. Kline Seconded by: C.W. Jessop RESOLVED THAT: Report #11/80 of the Executive committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #ll/BO of the Executive Committee, dated July 9, 19BO. CARRIED: REPORT #12/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #12/80 of the Executive Committee, which was dealt with by separate resolutions. Item 1, Section 1 The Metropolitan Toronto & Region Conservation Foundation -Appointment of New Member Res. #65 Moved by: Mrs. F. Gell Seconded by: Dr. T.H. Leith RESOLVED THAT: Item 1, Section I of Report #12/80 of the Executive Committee, be received: and THAT the recommendation, as contained therein, and as amended and set forth herein, be adopted. "That Mr. Wm. H. Stephenson be appointed a Member of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation for a three-year periOd, commencing July 4, 1980: and That Mr. E.T. JacKson be re-appointed to the Foundation for a further three-year period, commencing November 25, 1980." CARRIED: Section II Res. #66 Moved by: Mrs. H.D. Sutter Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Section 11 of Report #12/80 be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #12/BO of the Executive Committee, pages B-2 2 9 to B-237 inclusive, dated July 23, 19BO. CARRIED: REPORT #13/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Report #13/BO of the Executive Committee was presented. Res. #67 Moved by: H.G. Westney Seconded by: M.J. Breen RESOLVED THAT: Report #13/80 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #13/80 of the Executive Committee, dated August 6, 19BO. CARRIED: A-113 -4- REPORT #14/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Report #14/80 of the Executive Committee was presented. Res. #68 Moved by: M.W.H. Biggar Seconded by: R.J. Fitzpatrick RESOLVED THAT: Report #14/80 of the Executive Committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #14/80 of the Executive Committee, dated August 20, 1980. CARRIED. REPORT #15/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Report #15/80 of the Executive Committee was presented. Res. #69 Moved by: F.R. Perkins Seconded by: Dr. W.M. Tovell RESOLVED THAT: Report #15/80 of the Executive committee be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #15/80 of the Executive Committee, dated September 10, 1980. CARRIED: REPORT #16/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #16/80 of the Executive Committee, which was dealt with by separate resolutions: Item 1, Section I Report #5/80 - Finance Sub-Committee Res. #70 Moved by: M.J. Breen Seconded by: M.W.H. Biggar RESOLVED THAT: The 1981 Preliminary Budget Estimates, as appended as Schedule "A" of the Minutes of Meeting #16/80 of the Executive Committee, be approved. CARRIED: Item 2, Section I Report #2/80 of the Conservation Land Management Advisory Board Res. #71 Moved by: Dr. T.H. Leith Seconded by: Dr. W.M. Tovell RESOLVED THAT: Item 2, Section I of Report #16/80 of the Executive Committee, be received: and THAT Recommendation #2, as set forth herein, be adopted: #2 The fee schedule amendments to Ontario Regulation 845/77, As Amended, Regulation made under The Conservation Authorities Act, as appended as Schedule "A" of the Minutes of Meeting #2/80 of the Conservation Land Management Advisory Board, be included in the 1981 Amendments to Ontario Regulation 845/77, to become effective January 1, 1981. CARRIED: Item 3, Section I Report #3/80 of the Historical Sites Advisory Board Res. #72 Moved by: M.W.H. Biggar Seconded by: F.R. Perkins RESOLVED THAT: Item 3, Section I of Report #16/80 of the Executive Committee, be received: and THAT Recommendation #2, as set forth herein, be adopted: -5- A-114 #2 The amendments to Schedule of Ontario Regulation 845/77, As Amended, Regulation made under The Conservation Authorities Act, as appended as Schedule "B" of the Minutes of Meeting #3/80 of the Historical Sites Advisory Board, be included in the 1981 Amendments to Ontario Regulation 845/77. CARRIED: Item 4, Section I Report #1/80 of the Information & Education Advisory Board Res. #73 Moved by: Dr. T.H. Leith Seconded by: Mrs. L. Hancey RESOLVED THAT: Item 4, Section I of Report ~16/80 of the Executive Committee, be received: and THAT Recommendation #2, as set forth herein, be adopted: #2 The amendments to Schedule - Section 44 of Ontario Regulation 845/77, -- As Amended, Regulation made under The Conservation Authorities Act, as appended as Schedule "B" of the Minutes of Meeting #1/80 of the Information and Education Advisory Board, be included in the 1981 Amendments to Ontario Regulation 845/77, to become effective January 1, 1981. CARRIED: Item 5, Section I Report #2/80 of the Waterfront Advisory Board Res. #74 Moved by: M.J. Breen Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Item 5, Section I of Report #16/80 of the Executive Committee, be received: and THAT Recommendation #3, as set forth herein, be approved: #3 Having regard to a proposed long-term lease by the Frenchman's Bay -- Yacht Club of Authority-owned lands in the Town of Pickering: (a) Effective January 1, 1981, a 20-year lease be executive with the Frenchman's Bay Yacht Club for the use of 0.86 acres of land and 0.70 acres of water: (b) Such lease utilize the same rental rate formula and per acre cost as approved by the Metropolitan Toronto Council: (c) Such lease contain similar terms and conditions to those included in the Ashbridge's Bay Yacht Club lease, and any additional terms and conditions deemed to be appropriate to the Frenchman's Bay Yacht Club situation: ( d) In the lease, provision be made for rent review to be implemented every five years: (e) The appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect to the foregoing: ( f) Finalization of the lease be subject to issuance of an Order-in- Council in accordance with Section 20(c) of The Conservation Authorities Act. CARRIED: Item 6, Section I Waterfront Project 1977-1981 -1980 Budget Revisions Res. #75 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: J.S. Scott RESOLVED THAT: Item 6, Section I of Report #16/80 of the Executive Committee, be received: and A-lIS -6- THAT the 1980 Budget Revisions to the 1977-1981 Waterfront project, as appended as Schedule "B" of the Minutes of Meeting #16/80 of the Executive Committee, be included in the 1980 Budget Estimates of the Authority. CARRIED: Section II Res. #76 Moved by: Mrs. N. Pownall Seconded by: W.R. Herridge, Q.C. RESOLVED THAT: Prior to finalization of any project for erosion control scheduled for the year 1982 or subsequently thereto, said project be reviewed by the Authority membership. CARRIED: Res. #77 Moved by: F.J. McKechnie Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #16/80 be received and approved, as set forth in pages B-299 to B-3l3 inclusive, dated October 1, 1980. CARRIED: NEW BUSINESS The Secretary-Treasurer advised that the Authority Annual Dinner will be held on Sunday, December 7, 1980, at the Boyd Conservation Field Centre, commencing at approximately 5:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT On Motion, the meeting adjourned at 2:20 p.m., October 10. R. Grant Henderson K.G. Higgs Chairman Secretary-Treasurer KC. ~ A-116 , the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes AUTHORITY MEETING #6/80 FRIDAY-DECEMBER-5-1980 #6/BO , Meeting #6/80 of the Authority was held on Friday, December 5, 19BO, at the Authority Office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Onto The meeting was called to order at 1:30 p.m. in the Humber Room. PRESENT WERE Vice-Chairman Mrs. F. Gell Members W.G. Barber M.W.H. Biggar M.J. Breen F.J. Brown S.W. Caldwell R.J. Fitzpatrick D.G. Fleet Mrs. J.A. Gardner R. Gillespie Mrs. L. Hancey Gavin Henderson W.R. Herridge, Q.C. R.W. Johnson C.F. Kline E.V. Kolb Dr. T.H. Leith S.A. Macpherson Mrs. S.B. Martin F.J. McKechnie F.R. Perkins J.S. Scott G.B. Sinclair R.F. Starr M.M.R. Stewart Mrs. N.J. Stoner Mrs. B. Sutherland Mrs. H.D. Sutter Mrs. J. Trimmer H.G. Westney D. White G.A. Williams R.F.M. Yuill Chairman, M.T.R.C.F. W.H. Stephenson Past Chairman, M.T.R.C.F. and former Member, M.T.R.C.A. E.H. Card Authority Staff K.G. Higgs W.A. McLean W.E. Jones T.E. Barber P.B. Flood M. R. Garrett Mrs. A.C. Deans B.E. Denney D. Dyce T.E. Farrell Ms. E.A. Freeman J.W. Maletich J.C. Mather D.J. Prince Mrs. K. Conron Mrs. M.M. Mitchell A-ll 7 -2- ABSENT WERE Chairman R. Grant Henderson Members Mrs. C. Dell D. DiGiannantonio C. Jessop D.J. Johnson E. King D.W. Kitchen M.D. Lipton, Q.C. Mrs. V.A. Marshall V.K. McCreary R.A.P. Moran Mrs. N. Pownall B.V. Singh R. Skjarum A. Tonks Dr. W.M. Tovell Mrs. A. Walker In the absence of Mr. R.G. Henderson, Mrs. Florence Gell chaired the meeting. Mrs. Gell welcomed the members to the last Authority meeting of the year. She advised that the Chairman is presently in Peel Memorial Hospital, but sent his sincere thanks for the cards and good wishes he has received. MINUTES The Minutes of Meeting #5/80 were presented. Res. #78 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: F.R. Perkins RESOLVED THAT: The Minutes of Meeting #5/80, as presented, be adopted as if read. CARRIED: REPORT #17/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #17/80 of the Executive Committee, which was dealt with by separate resolutions. Item 1, Section I Waterfront Project 1977-1981: Pickering/Ajax Sector -Property: Aileen Phelps-Rodd, 530 Rodd Avenue, Pickering -&- Hertha Jaworsky, 515 Bella Vista Drive, Pickering This item was rescinded by Res. #463 of the Executive Committee, and was considered under Section II of Report #19/80. Item 2, Section I 1981-1985 Multi-Year Forecast Res. #79 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: M.W.H. Biggar RESOLVED THAT: Item 2, Section I of Report #17/80 of the Executive Committee be received; and THAT the recommendation, as contained therein and set forth herein, be adopted: THAT the 1981-1985 Multi-Year Forecast, as appended as Schedule "A" of the Minutes of Meeting #17/80 of the Executive Committee, be approved. CARRIED; Section II Res. #80 Moved by: G.B. Sinclair Seconded by: M.W.H. Biggar RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #17/80 be received and approved, as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #17/80 of the Executive Committee, pages 8-317 to B-329 inclusive, dated October 15, 1980. CARRIED: -3- A-U8 REPORT #18/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #18/80 of the Executive Committee, which was dealt with by separate resolutions. Item 1, Section I The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation Res. #81 Moved by: Dr. T.H. Leith Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Section I of Report #18/80 of the Executive Committee be received: and THAT Recommendation #1, as set forth herein, be adopted: f1 That the resignation of Mr. E.H. Card as Chairman of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation be noted with regret: and That a suitable letter of congratulations and best wishes be forwarded to Mr. W.H. Stephenson on his election to the post of Chairman of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation: . And further that the Executive Committee recommend to The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority that the following persons be re-admitted as Members of the Foundation for further three-year periods: E.H. Card February 21, 1981 to February 21, 1984 F.G. Gardiner, B.A. , Q. C. , LL.D. February 21, 1981 to February 21, 1984 Mrs. J.A. Gardner February 21, 1981 to February 21, 1984 J.E. Langdon May 30, 1981 to May 30, 1984 P.S. Lindsay February 21, 1981 to February 21, 1984 D. Melnik, Q.C. February 21, 1981 to February 21, 1984 M.O.P. Morrison March 2, 1981 to March 2, 1984 CARRIED: Res. #82 Moved by: Dr. T.H. Leith Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Recommendation #2 of Section I of Report #18/80 of the Executive Committee, as set forth herein, be adopted: WHEREAS Mr. Elgin H. Card has served as a member of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation from 1966 until 1980, a period of 15 years, and as Chairman from 1967 until 1980: and WHEREAS, during his tenure of office as Chairman, the Foundation raised funds in the amount of $3,000,000. for projects, progralTUlles, endowment funds, exhibits, awards, displays, and equipment, including: .Cold Creek Conservation Field Centre .The restorations at the Black Creek Pioneer Village .Claremont Copservation Field Centre .Conservation Libraries .Education Courses .Kortright Centre for Conservation .Bruce's Mill Restoration Fund . B. Harper Bull Fellowship Awards Fund .Black Creek Pioneer Village Growth Endowment Fund .Kortright Centre Growth Endowment Fund -AND WHEREAS Mr. Card has served as a member of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority from 1967 until 1980, a period of 14 years, and as a member of the Executive Committee from 1968 until 1980: and WHEREAS Mr. Card, throughout his years of distinguished service as a member and Chairman of the Foundation and as a member of the Authority, by his contribution of time and talents, has significantly advanced the work of the Authority: A-1l9 -4- THEREFORE THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT: On the occasion of Mr. Elgin H. Card's resignation as a member of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Authority gratefully acknowledge the enduring contribution that Mr. Card has made to the conservation of natural resources in the Metropolitan Toronto area. CARRIED: DR. T.H. LEITH spoke to Resolution #B2,. thanking Mr. Card on behalf of himself, the members and staff, for all that he has contributed to and accomplished for the Authority over the past years. MRS. F. GELL introduced Mr. W.H. Stephenson, newly-appointed Chairman of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation. , Item 2, Section I Farm Sub-Committee - Report #l/BO -Licence Agreement: Glassco Farm Earl & Gladys Dyball Res. t83 Moved by: Dr. T.H. Leith Seconded by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner RESOLVED THAT: Item 2, Section I of Report #lB/80 of the Executive Committee, be received: and THAT the recommendation, as set forth herein, be adopted: The staff be directed to arrange for the preparation of a suitable Licence Agreement, as appended as Schedule "A" of the Minutes of Meeting #18/80 of the Executive Committee, between The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Earl and Gladys Duba11 for the use of the Glassco Farm, on a basis similar to that presently in existence at the Albion Hills Farm: and That the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to sign the necessary documents to give effect thereto.. CARRIED: Section II Res. #84 Moved by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner Seconded by: C.F. Kline RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #18/80 be received and approved, as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #18/80 of the Executive Committee, pages B-332 to B-377 inclusive, dated October 29, 19BO. CARRIED: REPORT #19/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The staff presented Report #19/80 of the Executive Committee, which was dealt with by separate reSOlutions. Item 1, Section I Interim Water & Related Land Management Project 1979-1981 -Addendum to the Supplementary Project for the Dredging of the Keating Channel, Don River Res. #85 Moved by: B.A. Macpherson Seconded by: C.F. Kline RESOLVED THAT: Item 1, Section I of Report #19/80 of the Executive Committee, be received: and THAT the Addendum to the Supplementary Project, Interim Water and Related Land Management Project 1979-1981, for the Dredging of the Keating Channel, be adopted: AND FURTHER THAT the following action be taken: .(a) The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto be requested to approve the Addendum and be designated benefiting municipality, contributing 45% of the Authority's share of the cost of the Environmental Assessment preparation: -5- A-120 (b) The Province of Ontario be requested to approve the Addendum to the Supplementary Project and to provide a grant of 55% of the Authority's share of the cost of the Assessment preparation: (c) The Toronto Harbour Commissioners be requested to provide 50% of the total cost of the Environmental Assessment: ( d) Authority officials be authorized to take the necessary action required in connection with the Addendum to the Supplementary Project, including execution of any necessary documents. CARRIED: . Section II MR. R.F.M. YUILL declared a conflict of interest in respect of Item 3 of Section II and did not vote on the resolution. Res. #86 Moved by: Mrs. N.J. Stoner Seconded by: M.J. Breen RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #19/80 be received and approved, as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #19/80 of the Executive Committee, pages B-378 to B-400 inclusive, dated November 12, 1980. CARRIED: REPORT #20/80 OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE DELEGATIONS MRS. GELL advised the members that she had received a telephone call from an area resident requesting permission to appear before the Authority regarding its Watershed Plan. A second request had also been r~ceived later on this date. Res. #87 Moved by: W.R. Herridge, Q.C. Seconded by: J.S. Scott RESOLVED THAT: The delegations of Helen Juhola, President, Toronto Field Naturalists, and Mary Smith, interested citizen and sometime representative of The Ontario Shade Tree Council, The Ontario Association of Landscape Architects, The Conservation Council of Ontario, and the Federation of Ontario Naturalists, be heard, and that they limit their remarks to a duration of ten minutes for each speaker. CARRIED: The delegations indicated an interest in having input into the Watershed Plan. They advised they had experienced some difficulty with respect to obtaining copies of the Plan. Res. #88 Moved by: W.R. Herridge, Q.C. Seconded by: Mrs. S. Martin RESOLVED THAT: The speakers Helen Juhola, Delegation #1, and Mary Smith, Delegation #2, be thanked for their remarks, and that staff be requested to comment on the points raised. CARRIED: The Chairman and staff advised that there would be continuing input into the Watershed Plan, and that the Authority would welcome a formal presentation from the Toronto Field Naturalists. Item 1, Section I Watershed Plan and Programs -Revisions Mr. W.A. McLean, Director of Planning & Policy, was requested to highlight the amendments. A-121 -6- Mr. McLean advised that the Watershed Plan was circulated to all member and constituent municipalities, and to Ministries of the Government of Ontario, and comment and endorsement was requested of these agencies. The Authority undertook a program of public information on the Plan, prepared a presentation for each of the Councils, and sought permission to appear before Council meetings for such presentations. The majority of Councils requested and received presentations. Res. #89 Moved by: Dr. T.H. Leith Seconded by: M.J. Breen RESOLVED THAT: Item 1, Section I of Report #20/80 of the Executive Committee be received, and that the 'Watershed Plan - December 1980' be appended as Schedule , "All of these Minutes: and WHEREAS the Authority has been directed by the Province of Ontario to: "study and investigate the watershed and prepare and file with its member municipalities and the Minister of Natural Resources a Watershed Plan AND WHEREAS the Authority has undertaken extensive background study and discussed its proposals with its member municipalities and the Ministry of Natural Resources: AND WHEREAS the Watershed Plan and ten Programs have been circulated to the Ministry of Natural Resources, to the Authority's member municipalities, and to the area municipalities, for their comment and endorsement: AND WHEREAS the Plan and Programs have been revised on the basis of the comments received: NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Watershed Plan and Programs, December, 1980, be adopted and filed with the member municipalities and the Minister of Natural Resources: and THAT the Plan be forwarded to the Minister of the Environment for information. CARRIED: Item 2, Section I Ontario Regulation 735/73 -Proposed Amendment The staff presented the proposed amendment. Maps Nos. 2 through 377 (both inclusive) in this connection were available for reference at the meeting. Res. #90 Moved by: M.W.H. Biggar Seconded by: Mrs. S. Martin RESOLVED THAT: Item 2, Section I of Report #20/BO of the Executive Committee be received; and THAT the recommendation, as contained therein and set forth herein, be adopted: SUbject to the approval of the Lieutenant Governor-in-Council, the proposed amendment to Ontario Regulation 735/73, consisting of a text and schedules 1 through 10, both inclusive, as appended as Schedule flAil of the Minutes of Meeting #20/80 of the Executive Committee, and map Nos. 1 through 377, both inclusive, be approved, in principle: AND FURTHER THAT the aforementioned schedules I through 10, both inclusive, and map Nos. 1 through 377, both inclusive, are adopted as defining that part of the area over which The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has jurisdiction in which, in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding or pollution or the conservation of land may be affected by the placing or dumping of fill ; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate members of staff are instructed and authorized to take all such steps as are necessary to secure all approvals required to bring the proposed amendment to Ontario Regulation 735/73 into force and effect and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing'; to: ) -7- A-122 (a) notify relevant members of the Legislative Assembly of the Authority's intention to amend Ontario Regulation 735/73: (b) review the proposed amendment with the Ministry of Natural Resources and the regional and area municipalities within whose boundaries the proposed amendment is made applicable, and obtain their resolutions of agreement therewith: AND FURTHER THAT until the said proposed amendment is approved by the Lieutenant Governor-in-Council, the Authority will continue to apply and administer Ontario Regulation 735/73 in its present form. . CARRIED: Section II Res. #91 Moved by: F.J. Brown Seconded by: R.F.M. Yuill RESOLVED THAT: Section II of Report #20/80 be received and approved as set forth in the Minutes of Meeting #20/80 of the Executive Committee, pages 8-406 to 8-442 inclusive, dated November 26, 1980. CARRIED: NEW BUSINESS Res. #92 Moved by: Mrs. J.A. Gardner Seconded by: M.J. Breen RESOLVED THAT: The staff be directed to develop, in 1981, an information programme and, where necessary, hold suitable sessions with members of municipalities and others to determine the assisting role the Authority can play in implementing storm water drainage programmes within individual municipalities. CARRIED: ADJOURNMENT On Motion, the meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m., December 5. Mrs. Florence Gell, Vice-Chairman K.G. Higgs Acting Chairman Secretary-Treasurer KC. 1\-123 SCIillDUJ....E "1\" \'ll\TERSHED PLAN THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 5 SHOREHAM DRIVE DOWNSVIEW, ONTARIO M3N IS4 TELEPHONE 661-6600 DECEMBER, 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Plan Preparation 1 1.1.1 Conservation Reports 1 1.1.2 Mapping 2 1.1.3 Ilydrolog ic/nydrau lic Mode 11 ing 2 1.1.4 Damage Centre Analysis 2 1.1.5 Erosion Inventories 2 1.1.6 Environmental Review 2 1.1.7 Storm Water Management 2 1.1.8 Headwater Management 2 1.1.9 Fisheries 3 1.1.10 Inventories of Authority Managed Lands 3 1.1.11 Agriculture 3 1.1.12 visitor Survey 3 1.1.13 Environmentally Sensitive/ Significant Areas 3 1.1.14 Valleyland Biophysical Inventories 3 1.1.15 Municipal/Provincial Planning Documents 4 1.1.16 Public Participation 4 2. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY 6 2.1 Jurisdiction and Participating Municipalities 6 2.2 Organization 6 2.3 Funding 7 2.4 Program Implementation 8 2.5 Mandate and Role 8 2.6 Authority Programs 1957-1981 11 2.6.1 Water and Related Land Management 11 2.6.2 Conservation & Recreation Land Management 11 2.6.3 Metropolitan Toronto and Region Waterfront 12 2.6.4 Heritage Conservation 12 2.6.5 Information and Education 13 2.7 Other Resource-Related Jurisdictions 13 3. RESOURCE INVENTORY 16 3.1 Location 16 3.2 Physiographic Features 16 3.2.1 The OaK Ridges Moraine Complex 16 3.2.2 Niagara Escarpment 16 3.2.3 Till Plain 17 3.2.4 Peel Plain (Bevelled Till) 17 3.2.5 Iroquois Plain and Shoreline 17 3.2.6 Lake Ontario Shoreline 17 3.3 Watercourse Characteristics 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Page 2) PAGE 3.4 Climate 18 3.5 Forest Resources and Vegetation 18 3.6 Fish and wildlife 18 3.7 Patterns of Development 18 3.8 Public Open Space and Recreation 20 4. DEMANDS ON THE RESOURCE BASE 21 5. TilE WATERSHED PLAN 22 5.1 Introduction 22 5.2 The Management of Resources on the Watersheds of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 22 5.3 Flood Control Program 32 5.3.1 Policy 32 5.3.2 Program Description 33 5.4 Erosion and Sediment Control Program 37 5.4.1 POlicy 37 5.4.2 Program Description 38 5.5 Storm Water Management Program 42 5.5.1 Policy 42 5.5.2 Program Description 43 5.6 Land Acquisition Program 46 5.6.1 Policy 46 5.6.2 Program Description 47 5.7 Conservation Land Management Program 49 5.7.1 Policy 49 5.7.2 Program Description 50 5.8 Watershed Recreation Program 5l 5.8.1 Policy 51 5.8.2 Program Description 52 5.9 Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program 53 5.9.1 Policy 53 5.9.2 Program Description 54 5.10 Shoreline Management Program 55 5.10.1 Policy 55 5.10.2 Program Description 56 5.11 Heritage Conservation Program 59 5.11.1 Policy 59 5.11.2 Program Description 60 5.12 Community Relations Program 61 5.12.1 Policy 61 5.12.2 Program Description - Cons. Education 63 5.12.3 Program ~escription - Cons. Information 63 5.13 Direction 65 5.13.1 Interrelationship of Programs 65 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Page 3) PAGE 5.13.2 Costs and Financial Implications 65 5.13.3 priorities 68 6. GLOSSARY OF TERMS 70 APPENDIX: Selected Program Graphics , LIST OF FIGURES FOLLOWING PAGE 1 Authority Works 1957-1980 12 2 Physiographic Features 16 3 Land Use 20 4 Watershed Plan (insi~e back cover) LIST OF TABLES 1 Watercourse Characteristics 18 1. INTRODUCTION Each Conservation Authority i.n Ontario has been directed by the Province of Ontario to: "study and investigate the ~atepshed and ppepape and file ~ith its membep muni~ipalities and the Ministep of Natupal Resoupces. a Watepshed Plan." - Report of the Working Group on the Mandate and Role of the Conservation Authorities of Ontario (1979). Watershed planning is not a new initiative in the Province of Ontario. When each conservation authority was established, a watershed inventory was compiled and a resource management program proposed. Many of these inventories became out-of-date and new technologies were developed which required consideration in establishing program priorities and implementing watershed objectives. The Authority needed to review its work in the context of new information. Community requirements, as served by the Authority, had also evolved and programs and policies needed evaluation and, where appropriate, redirection. The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority recognized the need to review and evaluate its resource management policies and programs and to prepare a comprehensive management statement as early as 1974. Work on this review commenced in 1975. As a result of carrying out studies to inventory the Authority's area of jurisdiction, reviewing existing pOlicies and programs, and developing this Watershed Plan, it has been recognized that a continual updating of the data base used to propose resource management measures is required. Therefore, a part of the Authority's subsequent efforts will be directed to maintaining and, where required, expanding a data base upon which logical and justifiable resource management decisions may be made. 1.1 PLAN PREPARATION The following provides a brief summary of the reviews and studies carried out during the preparation of this Plan. 1.1.1 Conservation Reports These documents, prepared for each watershed, provided valuable historical resource information and identified conditions in the Authority's watersheds during the late 1940's and early 1950'~. , 1.1.2 Mapping - 2 - New metric base mapping (1:2000) was prepared for all urainage areas excecding l300 hectares and was compilcd from aerial photography undertaken in 1976 and 1977. The mapping used prior to this was prepared during the late 1950's and early 1960's, with some updating in 1972, and did not accurately depict current land use'and physical characteristics. 1.1.3 Hydrologic/Hydraulic Modelling Following the preparation of the base mapping, hydrologic/hydraulic modelling studies were carried out to identify those areas susceptible to flooding under various frequency storm events and the Regional Storm. 1.1.4 Damage Centre Analysis Having identified flood susceptible areas, an analysis and evaluation of the value of potential damage was undertaken to establish an economic component for use in the formulation of remedial measures. 1.1.5 Erosion Inventories During 1977, erosion sites requiring remedial measures were identified in each of the Regional Municipalities of Durham, Peel and York. This provided information similar to that identified within Metropolitan Toronto prior to the adoption of the 1973 Project for Erosion Control and Bank Stabilization in Metropolitan Toronto. 1.1.6 Environmental Review As many of the works being proposed by the Authority will be subject to review under The Environmental Assessment Act, background data was collected at sites of potential remedial measures for flood and erosion control and in connection with Authority waterfront development proposals. These studies and the analysis of data continue beyond the period of Plan preparation. Inventories of Authority lands designated for Conservation Areas and Forest and Wildlife Areas were also carried out in order to provide environmental data for Master Plan development. 1.1.7 Storm Water Management The Authority's concerns for the impact of development proposals on downstream flooding and erosion control required the review of storm water management systems, and resulted in the formulation of program proposals, as part of this Plan. 1.1.8 Headwater Management Community :~nterest in the headwaters area, particularly the Oak Ridges Moraine and Niagara Escarpment, became evident through the Authority's 1976 Headwaters Management S~minar. Subsequently, a review and consolidation of existing information pertaining to the headwaters were undertaken to identify resource management requirements and to enable policy development. - 3 - 1.1.9 Fisheries Between 1973 and 1976, the Authority and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources studieo the fisheries resource on Authority lands and proposed improvements to increase the potential for angling opportunities. Studies by staff to assess the potential of streams, on both private and public land, to support a cold water fishery and stream enhancement works were initiated in 1979 under the Strategic Planning for Ontario Fisheries (SPOF) Program. 1.1.10 Inventories of Authority Managed Lands Biophysical and forest inventories are being carried out to assist in the formulation of management proposals. Authority lands were surveyed to identify potential for forest extension to control wind erosion, to stabilize valley walls, to reduce disturbance from adjacent land uses, and to improve wildlife habitat. Biophysical inventories will identify those lands sensitive to recreational use. 1.1.11 Agriculture Inventories of agricultural land practices on Authority land were undertaken to assist in the formulation of concept plans for Authority lands and to provide information for future lease agreements. 1.1.l2 Visitor Survey A comprehensive survey was carried out in 1979 to augment data collected fur Conservation Area use in 1972 and waterfront park use in 1972 and 1976. Review and analysis of this information is required to ascertain community requirements and to enable the planning of relevant facilities. 1.1.13 Environmentally Sensitive/Significant Areas Preliminary work in the id~ntification of areas suitable for Authority concern included the review and consolidation of all previous studies carried out within the watershed by other groups or agencies. Subsequently, site evaluations, based on defined Authority goals and objectives, will permit the delineation of the lands suitable for Authority acquisition or regulation and recommendations of appropriate management techniques. 1.1.14 Valleyland Biophysical Inventories These studies were initially undertaken to assist in the development of valleyland policies as parl of the preparation of an Official Plan for Metropolitan Toronto. The Authority, in 1978, extended this mapping project to include the valleylands adjacent to Metropolitan Toronto so as to assist in the review of planning proposals, to identify valleyland management requirements and to evaluate proposals for relocation of the Authority's fill regulation line. - 4 - 1. 1. 15 Municipal/Provincial Planning Document~ A review and consolidation of current municipal and provincial planning proposals were necessary to identify and assess their impact on the future direction of Authority resource management programs and policies. Continual review and evaluation of suhsequent proposals will bc required to enahle the Authority to respond to changcs within its watershed. 1.1.16 Public Participation Throughout the preparation of the Watershed Plan the Authority has maintained an ongoing effort to involve and gain input from its watershed community. The following specific public participation steps were taken. (a) An Interim Water and Related Land Management Plan and an Interim Conservation and Recreation Land Management Plan were prepared and circulated to all member municipalities and local municipalities, together with ministries of the Government of Ontario, for conunent. The Interim Plans reviewed the historic programs of the Authority, outlined physical characteristics and resource management problems and recommended candidate policies and programs for consideration. Reponses from the majority of municipalities were received after, in many cases, the municipalities had discussed the plans in public meetings. The Interim Plans were also circulated for comment to the area school boards, The Metropolitan Toronto Board of Trade and various citizen groups on request. The comments received on the Interim Plans were considered a major input to the Watershed Plan. (b) The Authority established a Technical Task Force to advise on specific aspects of the Watershed Plan including the Flood Control, Erosion and Sediment Control, Storm Water Management and Conservation Land Management Programs. The Technical Task Force was made up of municipal and provincial officials from various departments and ministries having an interest in the works to be considered in these programs. The major alternative strategies were considered by the Technical Task Force and reconunendations made to the Authority. ( c) The Authority attended council and public meetings to discuss aspects of the programs considered by the Technical Task Force. Particular emphasis was placed on the damage centre concept in the Flood Control Program. (d) Public seminars to which technical experts, municipal representatives, citizen groups and individuals were invited, were held on the Storm Water Management, Erosion and Sediment Control and Conservation Land Management Programs, particularly as they affected the headwater zone. (e) Public meetings, either in the form of discussions with affected owners, public forums or citizen liaison conunittees, were held to discuss all waterfront area concept plans which are found in the Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program and the proposals of the Shoreline Management Program. Several meet~ngs were held with the boating community about the Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program as it affects boating. - 5 - (f) 'rhe proposals of the Watershed Recreation Program were supported by visitor surveys and wide public discussion of the proposals of the Royal Commission on Metropolitan Toronto with respect to the Authority's recreational use of conservation lands. The proposals of the Community Relations Program were developed in cooperation with a Joint Planning Committee which has been established between the Authority and the area school boards. (g) The proposals in the Heritage Conservation Program were developed in cooperation with the Historical Sites Advisory Board which has representatives from many facets of the historical sites community. (h) The Authority has had input into the preparation of municipal official plans and has commented on official plan proposals. This participation included working with the Metropolitan Toronto Planning Committee on the Metro Valley Land Study. All of the Programs and the Watershed Plan in their draft form were submitted to all member municipalities of the Authority, all local municipalities and the Ministry of Natural Resources for comment and endorsement. A team of Authority representatives presented the Plan to the councils of all member municipalities, the majority of all local municipalities and the Cabinet Committee on Resource Development. As an aid in these presentations the Authority prepared exhibits of the Plan which were placed in the public areas of municipal buildings and shopping plazas together with a tabloid summary of the Plan. As a result of these presentations, comments have been received and the Watershed Plan and the Program documents have been revised, where required, to accommodate the concerns expressed. As a result of these public participation steps, the Watershed Plan is an expression by the community of the preferred strategies for the management of renewable natural resources in the area under the Authority's jurisdiction. - 6 - 2. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY In 1946, the Province of Ontario enacted The Conservation Authorities Act, permitting municipalities in a watershed (or watersheds) to form a conservation authority to conserve and manage natural resources. The basic concepts embodied in the Act are: . local ini.tiative . cost sharing (municipal/provincial) . watershed jurisdiction. The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority was fo rmed in 1957 by amalgamation of four earlier authorities: the Etobicoke (1946), later including Mimico Creek: the Humber ( 1948 >: the Don (1948 >: and .the Rouge-Duffin-Highland-Petticoat (1954). This union permitted a broader perspective to resource management and a more substantial financial base. The primary responsibilities of the Authority are for water management in the Metropolitan Toronto region, specifically in response to the flood damages incurred by Hurricane Hazel in 1954. The programs of the Authority are developed in response to community requirements for resource management for flood control, erosion control, regional recreation and conserva.tion education. In 1970, these responsibilities were broadened by its designation as implementing agency for The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Waterfront Plan. 2.1 JURISDICTION AND PARTICIPATING MUNICIPALITIES The Authority's area of jurisdiction includes 3,467 square kilometres: 2,506 on land and 961 water-based. This comprises all watersheds of all streams entering Lake Ontario from Etobicoke Creek to Carruthers Creek (added in 1959), as well as Lake Ontario to a point defined by the Territorial Divisions Act, R.S.O. 1970, Chapter 4.5.8 and Order-in-Council 49/74. The Authority has six participating municipalities: The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto: The Regional Municipalities of Durham, Peel and York; and the Townships of Adjala and Mono. In 1979 the population within the Authority's jurisdiction was approximately 2,500,000. 2.2 ORGANIZATION The Authority's member municipalities and the Province of Ontario appoint members to the Authority in accordance with The Conservation Authorities Act, Sections 5 and 13. Of the 51 appointed members, the following is the current distribution of membership: - 7 - Province of Ontario 3 Metropolitan Toronto 24 Region of Durham 5 ) ) Region of Peel 8 ) ) = 24 Region of York 10 ) ) Adjala-Mono I ) Section 5 of the Act requires that the number of representatives from Metropolitan Toronto be equal to the total number of appointees by other participating municipalities. The Authority is a body corporate whose administration of policy is determined by its mandate under the Act and by Regulations and Rules which it has adopted. To carry out its responsibilities the Authority appoints nine Advisory Boards: four watershed boards, representing the previously named authorities: and five functional boards, representing specific programs. The Boards are: . Conservation Land Management . Flood Control and Water Conservation . Historical Sites . Information and Education . Waterfront . Don Valley . Etobicoke-Mimico . Humber Valley . Rouge-Duffin-Highland-Petticoat. The Advisory Boards consider matters defined by their terms of reference and make recommendations to the Executive Committee and to the Authority. The regular business of the Authority is conducted by the Executive Committee comprised of the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Authority: the Chairmen of the nine Advisory Boards: and the Chairman of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation (if also an appointee to the Authority). The Chairman of the Authority may be appointed by the Province of Ontario or elected from among the members of the Authority. The Vice-Chairman is elected annually, by the appointed members, from the total membership. The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation was fo rmed in 1961 "to create and operate a fund to be used exclusively for the benefit of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority in the cultivation and advancement of conservation." The Chairman of the Foundation is elected annually. 2.3 FUNDING Provision is made in The Conservation Authorities Act for the Province of Ontario to make grants to the Authority and for the Authority to levy its - 8 - participating municipalities to enable the implementation of Authority projects. Grants for Black Creek Pioneer Village are not available under The Conservation Authorities Act but are available from the Ministry of Culture and Recreation under its museum grant program. The Federal Government has also participated in funding major remedial fl ood control and water conservation works and in waterfront development. Funds are also raised through user fees at Authority operated facilities: through rental of Authority-owned property; from charges made for Authority services: and through other government agencies, such as Boards of Education and Wintario. The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation receives donations from individuals, organizations, foundations and corporations which are used to augment the Authority's funding for specific projects, such as Pioneer Village. 2.4 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION The Authority's resource management program is based on: . its mandate as established by The Conservation Authorities Act, and . its role as determined by consultation with the Province and the participating municipalities. The Province and the participating municipalities, in reviewing program proposals, determine the appropriate public participation. The public also may attend all meetings of the Authority, its Executive Committee and Advisory Boards, and may submit briefs regarding proposals. 2.5 MANDATE AND ROLE The work of conservation authorities derives from The Conservation Authorities Act which, in its provision, defines the scope and limits of Authority responsibilities. These legislative provisions provide the basis for Authority work. They are sufficiently broad to enable authorities to deal with the conservation needs which ar~se from the characteristics of individual watersheds and the pattern of development which has been imposed on them. "Objects 19. The objects of an authopity ape to establish and undeptake, in the apea ovep which it has jupisdiction, a ppogpam designed to fupthep the consepvation, pe stopa tion, development and management of natupal pesoupces othep than gas, oil, coal and minepals. R.B.a., 1970, c. 78, s. 19. Poweps of 20. Fop the puppose of accomplishing its objects, an authop- authopity has powep, ities. (a) to study and investigate the watepshed and to detepmine a ppogpam whepeby the natupal - 9 - reSOUl'ces of the watcrshed may be conscrved, restore d, deveZopcd and managed; (b) for any purpose necessary to an y project under consideration 01" undertaken by the author>ity, to enter> into and upon any Zand and sur>vey and take ZeveZs of 'it and make such lJor>ings or> sink such tr>iaZ pits as the author>ity considers necessar>y; (c) to acquire by pUr>chasc, Zease 01' other>wise and to expr>opr>iate any Zand that it may r>equir>e, and subject to the appr>ovaZ of the Lieutenant Gover>nor> in CounciZ, to seZ Z, Zease 01' other>wise dispose of Zand so acquir>ed; (d) to Zease for a ter>m of one year> or> Zess, without the approvaZ of the Lieutenant Governor in CounciZ, Zand acquir>ed by the AuthoT'ity; ............. . (fJ to purchase 01' acquir>e any per>sonaZ pr>ope7'ty that it may requir>e and seZZ or> otherwise deaZ the7'ewith; (g) to enter into such agr>eements for> the purchase of mater>iaZs, empZoyment of Zabou7' and such other> pur>poses as may be necessar>y for the due carrying out of any pr>oject; (h) to enter> into agr>eements with owne rs of p7'ivate Zands to faci Zitate the due carrying out of any pr>oject; (i) to determine the pr>oport~on of the totaZ benefit afforded to aZZ the par>ticipating municipaZities that is afforded to each of them; (j) to er>ect works and str>uctures and C7'eate 7'eservoirs by the construction of dams 01' otherwise; (k) to contr>oZ the fZow of sUr>face waters in order to prevent fZoods 01' poZZution 01' to reduce the adverse effects thereof; (l) to alter the course of any river, canal, brook, stream 01' water>cour>se, and divert 01' alter, as welZ tempor>arily as permanently, the COU7'se of any river>, st r>eam, road, st ree t 01' way, 01' raise 01' sink its leveZ in or>der to ca rr>y it ove7' 01' under, on the Zevel of 01' by the side,of any work buiZt 01' to be built by the authority, and to divert 07' aZter the position of any waterpipe, gas-pipe, sewer, drain 01' any teZegraph, tel,ephone 07' electric wire 01' pole; (m) to use lands that are owned 01' control,led by the authority for such purposes, not inconsistent with its objects, as it considers p7'ope7' (n) to use l,ands owned 01' contr>ol,l,ed by the authority for park 01' other recreational, purposes, and to er>ect, 01' permit to be e7'ected, buiZdings, booths and facilities for such purposes and to make charges for admission thereto and the use thereof; (0) to coll,aborate and enter into agreements with minist7'ies and agencies of government, municipaZ counciZs and Zocal boards and other organizations; - 10 - (p) to plant and produce trees on C7'own lands, wit:h the consent of the Minister, and on othe 7' lands w1:th the consent of the owne r, for any pU7'pose; (q) to cause resea7'ch to be done; (7' ) generally to do all such acts as are necessa7'Y fo7' the due carrying out of any project. R.S.O. 1970, c. 78, s. 20; 1977., c. 64, s.4; 1972, c. 1, s. 2. 1972, c. 4, s. 12. " , Under the provisions of Sections 27, 28, and 29 of The Conservation Authorities Act, the Authority is empowered to enact regulations relating to the carrying out of its work. i) Section 27: Establishes the basis for the enactment of regulations pertaining to Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways. This section defines the instances wherein Authority permission may be required for works: the exceptions to such regulations: and the procedures for hearings and appeals under the regulation. The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has adopted and registered Schedules to Ontario Regulation 735/73 under this section of The Conservation Authorities Act. As a result of the mapping and studies completed in preparing this Plan, revisions to the regulation will be proposed for adoption. ii) Section 28: Establishes the ability of an authority to "make 7'egulations applicable to Zands o1JJned by the Autho7'ity." These regulations pertain to public use of Authority lands and the conditions, terms, fees, and permits which may apply. The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority has adopted Ontario Regulation 845/77 to implement the provisions of this section of The Conservation Authorities Act. Amendments to this regulation may be made, as required, relating to the fee structure for public use of Authority lands and facilities. Hi) Section 29: Establishes the Authority's ability to make regulations with respect to calling of and procedures at meetings: powers and duties of the Secretary-Treasurer: designation of signing officers: and the delegation of powers to the Executive Committee. Regulations have been adopted by the Authority to so guide its work. The 1979 Report of the Working Group on the Mandate and Role of the Conservation Authorities of Ontario reviewed the programs of authorities in order to clarify their role in watershed management. It affirmed the basic principles of local involvement, municipal-provincial partnership and watershed jurisdiction, as established in legislation and practice, and sta ted that: - 11 - "The mandate and powers provided by The Conservation Authorities Aet shaH be retained and eonaideration gi ven to reviaions to the legislation whieh wiH aRaist Conservation Authorities in meeting their responsibilities for the eonservation, restoration, development and management of natural resourees. " This report has been circulated to all conservation authorities, municipalities, and interested groups and agencies for comment. These responses are being considered and will form part of recommendations to the Provincial Cabinet. 2.6 AUTHORITY PROGRAMS 1957-1981 To implement its program objectives for resource management, the Authority, since its inception, has adopted pOlicies and projects. The following summarizes the major program areas undertaken since 1957 and Figure I Q illustrates completed works. 2.6.1 Water and Related Land Management This primary responsibility of the Authority has been dealt with through a number of projects and policy statements including: . the Plan for Flood Control and Water Conservation ( 1959) proposing a combination of remedial and preventative measures to address the problem of flood control; . the Statement of Flood Plain and Conservation Lands Policy ( 1961) formalized Authority policy regarding flood plain acquisition, regulation, and valleyland management: . the Master Plan for Flood Plain and Conservation Lands ( 1962, extended in 1974) formed the framework for the land acquisition component of flood control and water conservation and included lands below crest of slope along the major valleys; . Erosion Control and Bank Stabilization in Metropolitan Toronto (1973) and adding The Regional Municipalities of Durham, Peel and York ( 1979) enabled the provision of remedial works to address the problem of slope instabi'lity and erosion. 2.6.2 Conservation and Recreation Land Management As part of its agreements with the Federal and Provincial governments for flood control and water conservation, the Authority has adopted policies and programs to deal with those lands which it acquires and, subsequently, to assist other landowners to achieve conservation land management objectives. This work includes: . the Plan of Ancillary Conservation Measures (1961) prepared, as required by the Federal and Provincial governments, to address Authority management of lands acquired for flood control and water conservation and - 12 - to provide recreational use, fish and wildlife management, reforestation and stream improvements; . Pollution Control and Recreation in the Metropolitan Toronto Region (1963) recommended to other jurisdictions policies aimed at maintaining high water quality standards in order. to retain the ability of watercourses to provide recreational benefits; . the Private Reforestation Assistance Program (1957 ) enabling the Authority to provide, through reforestation, for rehabilitation of erosion-susceptible headwaters lands in private ownership; . the Forestry Agreement (1960) permitting the long-term management of reforested Authority lands by the Ministry of Natural Resources; . the Streambank Erosion Control Program (1966) enabling the Authority to carry out remedial works upstream of proposed reservoirs on both Authority owned and private lands; . the development and management of Conservation Areas and Forest and Wildlife Areas to enable public access and use. 2.6.3 Metropolitan Toronto and Region Waterfront In 1970, the Authority was designated by the prov.ince of Ontario to implement that part of the 1967 Waterfront Plan, prepared by the former Metropolitan Toronto Planning Board, falling within Authority jurisdiction. The Plan was aimed at providing water-oriented recreational opportunities and shoreline management along Lake Ontario. Three policy and program documents were adopted to implement this work. . The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Waterfront Plan 1972-l976 (l972), a 5 year work project; . The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Waterfront Plan 1972-1982 (1974), a statement of policies and objectives for a 10 year period: . The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Waterfront Project 1977-1981 (1976), a 5 year work project. 2.6.4 Heritage Conservation The Authority's heritage conservation work was initiated by the Humber Valley Authority's acquisition of the Dalziel property as part of the flood plain lands of the Black Creek. Over the years, additional structures were identified and have been relocated to Black Creek pioneer Village, restored and utilized to recreate life in a pre-Confederation settlement. The policies for development and management at this location have been set out in two reports: . pioneer Village - Black Creek Conservation Area (1964), and . Black Creek Pioneer Village (1969). ..., I I ! i : I , I j I I I I , j I ~ WATERSHED PLAN AUTHORITY WORKS 1957-J.980 ..'~ ", FIG. 1 )=i'7 the metropolitan toronto and region ~. .' conservation authonty - 13 - In addition, the Authority has conserved or cooperateo in the conservation of other structures of historical value, in situ, including Albion House (Albion Hills Conservation Area), the Bruce Mill and the Bruce House (Bruce's Mill Conservation Area) and Todmonlen Mills (Borough of East York). Archeological sites have also been identified on Authority lands at Black Creek and at Boyd Conservation Area. 2.6.5 Information and Education The Authority's resource management programs have been complemented through the evolution of programs to inform and involve the watershed community. These programs are: . Community and Staff Relations and . Outdoor and Conservation Education. To accomplish the objectives of these programs, policy statements have been adopted to guide and direct operations. In particular, pOlicies related to the planning, development and management of Authority lands and facilities for educational purposes were adopted in 1975. 2.7 OTHER RESOURCE-RELATED JURISDICTIONS The Authority is not the only agency in the Metropolitan Toronto region with resource management responsibilities. Municipal, provincial and federal programs also deal with resource management issues. The following provides a brief summary of the responsibilities of various levels of government. JURISDICTION RESOURCE/RELATED RESPONSIBILITY A. Municipal Preparation of Official Plan, secondary plans, subdivisions as under The Planning Act. Policy statements regarding resource-related municipal interests. Exercise of development control. Responsibilities for drainage, municipal services, open space. B. Provincial Ministries i) Agriculture & Food General: Agricultural drainage and erosion control. Administers The Drainage Act and The Tile Drainage Act, among others, to provide drainage and tile drainage works and to establish grants for assistance. Specific: Extension services, on request, provide, through agricultural repr~sentatives, a means of increasing the farmer's technical knowledge regarding prevention of soil loss. Carries out research regarding soils and crop production. - 14 - H) Culture & General: Historic sites, heritage Recreation conservation. Specific: Develops policies and programs for the conservation, protection and preservation of historical resources and heritage under The Ontario Heritage Act. Supports Ontario Heritage Foundation. Provides grants and administers Wintario program. Provides funding assistance to Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Kortright Centre for Conservation. Hi) Education/ General: Outdoor Education. Colleges & Specific: Develops curriculum regarding Universities outdoor and conservation education and other resource-related SUbjects. Through The Schools Administration Act, Boards are enabled to participate in programs provided by, or in cooperation with, conservation authorities. Teacher training programs, also in cooperation. iv) Environment General: \'later quality, water supply, storm water management, ground water management, environmental assessment. Specific: Administers The Ontario Water Resources Act, The Environmental Protection Act and The Environmental Assessment Act (among others). Develops guidelines for waste disposal~ ensures environmental safeguards in planning proposals~ administers water-taking permit system~ establishes guidelines and reviews environmental assessments. v) Housing General: Land use planning. Specific: Formulates land use planning and development policies~ reviews and approves municipal planning proposals under The Planning Act. Ensures the inclusion of policies which recognize and support Provincial interests. vi) Intergovernmental General: Municipal policy. Affairs Specific: Administers The Municipal Act and the legislation relating to the establishment and organization of Metropolitan Toronto and the province's Regional Municipalities. Recommends and advises regarding municipal and interprovincial policy. - 15 - vii) Natural Resources General: Fish and wildlife, forest management, outdoor recreation and mineral resources. Specific: Manages agreement:. forest land for multiple use purposes, including the production of timber. Grants are available to private lanc10wners under The Woodlands Improvement Act to assist in forest management. Manages Crov/I1 Land. Provides water and related land mangernent services to conservation authorities. Administers The Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act, requiring permits for certain works. Enhances streams for fish habitat and provides a wildlife land management program. Administers a licencing program under The Pits and Quarries Control Act. viii) Provincial General: Relating policies and priorities of Secretariat all resource-oriented Provincial ministries~ -Resources administers The Niagara Escarpment Planning Development and Development Act. Responsible for coordination amongst the Ministries of Agriculture and Food, Energy, Environment, Housing, Industry and Tourism, Labour, Natural Resources, Northern Affairs, and Transportation and Communications. Niagara Escarpment reports to Secretariat regarding preparation and implementation of development plan. ix) Treasury and General: Financial policy~ administers The Economics Parkway Belt Planning and Development Act. Specific: The Parkway Belt System, part of the Toronto-Centred Region Concept, is designed to provide urban separation~ utility corridors~ and open space through land use controls. C. Federal Conservation authorities have limited direct contact with federal resource-related legislations with the exception of certain Acts pertaining to bodies of water such as Lake Ontario and the Flood-Damage Reduction Program. Part of the Authority's work in preparing its Watershed Plan involved discussions with the numerous other resource-related groups in order to define the role of the Authority within its area of jursidiction. - 16 - 3. RESOURCE INVENTORY In order to formulate resource management policies and programs, the J\uthority carried out a comprehensive resource inventory. The following information is provided as a summary. 3.1 LOCATION The J\uthority's watershed jurisdiction centres around Metropolitan Toronto, on the north and toward the western end of Lake Ontario, and includes nine major watercourses - the Etobicoke, Mimico, Highland, Petticoat, Duffin and Carruthers Creeks and the Humber, Don and Rouge Rivers. In addition, numerous short watercourses flow into Lake Ontario particularly in Scarborough and around Frenclunan's Bay, PiCkering. The Authority's area of jurisdiction covers 3,467 square kilometers, of which 2,506 are land, and is bounded on the south by the international border in Lake Ontario. Approximately 64 kilometers of Lake Ontario shoreline are included. 3.2 PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES The physiographic characteristics of the region are factors important to the development of resource management programs by the Authority. The following provides a general description of the features identified on Figure 2. 3.2.1 The Oak Ridges Moraine Complex Stretching across the northern boundary of the Authority's watershed, this regionally significant landform is the divide for streams draining to LaKe Ontario and those draining to the north. The Moraine is referred to as interlobate, having been formed between two ice lobes during the last glacial period, and exemplifies the characteristics typical of such features - knobby hills, kettle lakes, and a complex mix of glacially deposited sand, gravel and till with outcrops of boulder clay. On the Moraine itself, few streams are found, however, precipitation falling over the height of land percolates through the porous materials until impervious material is reached, then flows horizontally and surfaces as streams along the slopes of the Moraine. 3.2.2 Niagara Escarpment The Niagara Escarpment, in the northwest section of the Authority's jurisdiction, is the headwaters of the Main Branch of the Humber River. This landform was created over 400 million years ago and is composed of layers of shale, limestone, sandstone and dolomite. Subsequent erosion and the deposition of a mantle of glacial drift have given the Escarpment its present characteristics. I LEGEND [IT] ........ Oak Ridges Moraine c=J Till Plain ~ Peel Plain (bevelled Ii II) ... , f~);~-;.'J Iroquois Plain .~ ",-.~. 0 4 Miles O"'tNiD , , I ~ , I . '\ ~,. Niagara Escarpment Area 0 6 Kilomelres . ' May. 1980 c& the metropolitan toronto and region WATERSHED PLAN PHYSIOGRAPH I C FEATURES FIG. 2 (t7 conservation authority . -17- 3.2.3 Till Plain The Till Plain, within the Authorit.y's jurisdiction, is a glncial feature exhibiting the characteristics of a ground moraine - from relat.ively little relief to areas of irregular knolls and hollows. In the eastern parts of the watershed the till materials are sandy while toward the west clay predominates. Tributaries of the Etobicoke, Humber, Don, Rouge, Petticoat and Duffin traverse the Plain cutting sharp valleys where the flow is at right angles to the slope. 3.2.4 Peel Plain (Revelled Till) Through the western and central portions of the region stretches an undulating clay plain, underlain by till or boulder clay. The heavy textured clays and isolated sandy areas may have been deposited by a temporary glacial lake. The Brampton Esker, a narrow gravel ridge, cuts across the Plain in the Region of Peel and is a source area for the Etobicoke Creek. Tributaries and main branches of the Etobicoke, Mimico, Humber, Don, Rouge and Duffin cut valleys of varying depths in the Peel Plain. 3.2.5 Iroquois Plain and Shoreline During glaciation, the lowlands of Lake Ontario were inundated by the waters of glacial Lake Iroquois covering previous clay and till deposits and adding, in some locations, a layer of sand. The shoreline of this glacial lake is evident across the central and eastern part of the region and, at the Scarborough Bluffs, becomes nearly coincident with the present shoreline of Lake Ontario. The river mouths and bays of the nine rivers and creeks of the watershed are found on this plain. Post-glacial erosion and deposition have modified the valley features while the land between the valleys is characterized by clays and till. 3.2.6 Lake Ontario Shoreline The Lake Ontario shoreline within Authority juriSdiction extends from the Etobicoke-Credit River divide in the west to the Carruthers Creek-Lynde Creek divide in the east. The shore cliff to the west is comparatively uniform with sandy sloping beaches to 7 metre sand, silt and clay bluffs. Fine sand beaches occur in the Toronto sector changing to 100 metre bluffs along the Scarborough lakefront. In Pickering and Ajax, the shoreline is characterized by bluffs of 6 to 23 metres, interspersed with flat sand beach areas. 3.3 WATERCOURSE CHARACTERISTICS A full description of each of the Authority's nine major watercourses is contained in the Flood Control Program. Table 1 provides, in chart form, the significant characteristics of each watercourse. In general, the watercourses are relatively short and react quickly to rainfall events. In specific instances, the flashy nature of the watercourses has been aggravated by the conversion of land from rural to urban use. - 18 - 3.4 CLH1ATE -- The Authority's jurisdiction exhihits a modified continental climate of moderately cold winters and moderately hot SlUnlllers. Precipitation is evenly distributed throughout the year with snow and rain from cyclonic storms predominating in winter and convectional precipitation, particularly thunderstorms, during summer. Considerable periods of sunshine occur especially during the summer. The mean daily temperatures, maximum and minimum, for the region are: January (-2 degrees C, - 11 degrees C), Apri 1 (11 degrees C, o degrees C) , July (27 degrees C, 14 degrees C) and October (14 degrees C, 4 degrees C). Lake Ontario exerts a moderating influence on climate which decreases with distance. 3.5 FOREST RESOURCES AND VEGETATION The Authority's area lies within the Great Lakes - St- Lawrence Forest Region in which the predominating natural cover is maple-beech woodlot. Coniferous stands, hemlock, white pine and white cedar are often found in conjunction with river valleys. Settlement of the region cleared much of the original forest, however, more recently the reforestation work of the Authority and the Ministry of Natural Resources has seen the reestablishment of forest cover, particularly in the headwaters. A high diversity of herbaceous and shrub species are found throughout the watershed and these, along with the forested lands, provide habitat for fish and wildlife and influence rates of runoff and erosion. 3.6 FISH AND WILDLIFE The presence of fish and wildlife resources are dependent upon the existence of suitable habitat. As land has been converted from forest to agriculture and to urban uses, the quality and quantity of habitat has decreased significantly, reducing fish and wildlife populations and, in some cases, eliminating certain species. Within the watershed, there remains a diversity of fish and wildlife resources which both the Authority and the Ministry of Natural Resources are working toward maintaining through habitat improvement. In particular, recent efforts have been directed to studying the fisheries of the region and to stream improvements which will increase the cold water fishery. 3.7 PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENT Within the Metropolitan Toronto region, urbanization had its beginnings in the eighteenth century. From the tiny settlements of that time has grown a substantial urban community of over two million people. - DRAINAGE PHYSIOGRAPHIC IADJACENT WATERCOURSE AREA SOURCE AREA CONFLUENCE GRADIENT INFLUENCE lLANO USE Etobicoke 207 km2 East Branch-Heart Lake East , West-north of Main , West- 3. Om/l<m Till Plain and Peel Upper reaches West Branch-Till Plain Bloor Street East-4.5m/km Plain predominate. rural: Li ttle Etobicoke-Till Little Etobicoke-at Little Etobicoke- Iroquois Plain in central an.d Plain the Queensway 1l.4m/km lower reaches lowoer reaches urban ltimico 28 km2 Rises on Peel Plain East , West-at Derry 4 . 9m/l<m Peel Plain in north; Predo:ninately Road Till Plain in central urban with sectors; Iroquois Plain development dawms tream occurring in I upper reac:'es HucDer 857 Jan2 West-Till Plain Main , East-at West-4.6m/km West-Till Plain and Predominately Main-Niagara Escarpment Woodbridge East-4m/km Peel Plain rural , M.oraine Main & West-at Main-above Cedar Main-Niagara Escarp. upstream of East-wilcox Lake Thistletown Mi 11 10m/km Moraine, Till Plain, Metropolitan Black Creek-Peel Plain Main , Black Creek- -below Cedar peel Plain and Toronto. west of Scarlett Mill 2. 5m/km Iroquois Plain Heavily urban Road East-Till plain and in Metro Peel Plain Black Creek-Peel Plain and Iroquois Plain Don 360 km2 West-northwest of Maple German Mills Creek and 6m/km Upper-Till Plain and Heavily East (Little Don)- East Branch-at Peel Plain urbanized Richmond Hill area Steeles Avenue Lower-Iroquois Plain with some German Mills Creek- West, East and Massey rural west of Richmond Creek-near Don Mills rerr.nan ts in Hill Road and Don Valley upper Massey Creek-edge of Parkway sections Peel Plain ( except Massey Creek) Highland 107 km2 Rises in north Morninqside Park Upper reaehes-7. Bm/km Predominately Till Urban Scarborough-vicinity of Lower reaches-3m/km Plain. Iroquois (Scarborough) Milliken-Till Plain Plain in Lower reaches Rouge 327 km2 Along southern edqe Main confluence-north Upper reaches-25m;km Southern edge of Predom~nately of Moraine of Highway 401 Lower reaches-2. 5m/km Moraine; then south rural, urban across Peel Plain, in lower Till Plain and r~aches I Iroquois Plain I ?eeticoat 26 km2 Rises on Till Plain Near Finch Avenue lOm/km Till Plain and Rural in IroquoiS Plain upper predominate reaches; Iroquois Plain in urban in lower section downstream. section :J'~fiin 294 lan2 West-northeast of Highway 2 and Brock West-lOm/km Southern edge of predominately Stouffville Road East-4 to 8m/km Moraine in north; rural; urban East-northeast of south of COnfluence then south across the south of Glen Major -lm/km Peel Plain, Till plain confluence I and Iroquois Plain carruther 's 40 km2 Till Plain and Upper reaches-10m/l<m Iroquois Plain predomina te ly Iroquois Plain south of Audley- predominates rural; 3IIl/km developing in I lower reaches ~ the metropolitan toronto and region WATERSHED PLAN WATERCOURSE CHARACTERISTICS TABLE 1 , conservation authority - 19 - The major watercourses within the Authori ty' s jurisdiction have affected and been affected by this development. The valley systems have been perceived as barriers to development to be overcome; as easily accessible transportation routes; as a locale for industry requiring water or water power; as a location for residential use; as utility corridors; as storm drainage systems; as open space; and as a valuable natural resource requiring protection. While certain of these uses are no longer relevant considerations, many still require accommodation within the valley system hence, a multi-use approach to valleyland management has evolved. Similar changes in perception have shaped the development of the Lake Ontario waterfront within the Authority's jurisdiction. As discussed more fully in the Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program, the waterfront initially represented the major attraction for early settlement, providing a means of transportation among communities, a source of water for industry and residential use, an access point into the hinterland by way of the valley systems, and an attractive site for community development and for recreation. The Toronto Harbour Commissioners' Plan of 1912 was the first major effort to reserve waterfront lands for public use. Prior to that time the lake front had increasingly been isolated from the community by the development of roads, rail systems and industry, built more and more on land created by fill. While the 1912 Plan retained the Toronto Islands and the Western and Eastern Beaches in the City of Toronto, it did not attempt to control development east or west of these areas. It was not until 1967 that a comprehensive plan for the provision of public waterfront parkland was developed to include all of the shoreline under Authority jurisdiction. As with the valley systems, the public objectives for waterfront lands now recognize and attempt to achieve a multi-use perspective in planning. In less than 200 years, the isolated settlements along Lake Ontario have grown, both in density and in spacial extent, to become part of the largest urban area in Ontario and, in fact, in Canada. Growth is not, however, complete and continues to add large blocks of land to urban use yearly. Figure 3 identifies existing land use within the Authority's watershed and, on the basis of current planning information, projects future land use to approximately 2000 A.D. Certain trends appear evident in future projections within the Authority's jurisdiction: . urbanization will continue but, generally, at a slower pace than in the past 20 year period; . urbanization will most affect The Regional Municipalities of Peel, York and Durham; . population growth within Metropolitan Toronto will level off, if not decrease; - 20 - . in the short term, Peel will grow most rapidly, followed by York, then Durham; . in the long term, the effect of the province's objective of stimulating growth east of Metropolitan Toronto may result i.n increased growth in Durham, parti.cularly in conjunction with the proposed Seaton Community. These factors will undoubtedly affect the programs proposed by the Authority and review and reevaluation will be required on a regular basis. 3.8 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION TIle resource management and conservation lands of specific concern to the Authority have been identified as the river valleys, the Lake Ontario waterfront, the Oak Ridges Moraine and the Niagara Escarpment. These 1 a nd s are also of considerable value to the region's residents, in that they provide a land base for recreation. The Authority has recognized the unique importance of these lands in an urban and near-urban setting and has made provision for publ ic open space uses on its lands. The 1971 Canada Land Inventory included an assessment of land capability to attract and sustain recreation use. This inventory recognized four landscapes, within the Authority's area of jurisdiction, as having the highest potenti'al for recreation use - the river valleys, the Lake Ontario waterfront, the Oak Ridgcs Moraine and the Niagara Escarpment. The provision of public open space within the Authority's watershed varies with municipal jurisdiction. Within Metropolitan Toronto, each constituent municipality has its own parks and recreation department in addition to the overall Metropolitan Toronto Parks Department. Local municipalities provide local park facilities whereas the Metropolitan Toronto Parks Department provides "regional" open space opportunities. The Authority has contributed at both the local and Metropolitan level through the leasing of its lands for municipal use. Outside Metropolitan Toronto, Thc Regional Municipalities of Peel, York and Durham do not operate regional parks departments and public open spa ce is a responsibility of the local municipality. The Authority has contributed to "regional" opportunities outside Metro on the conservation lands acquired for water and related land management and has, where appropriate, entered into lease arrangements with local municipalities. Within the Authority's area of jurisdiction, no Provincial Park facilities have been developed. The resource-based opportunities available on Authority lands provide a type of recreational use similar to that found in Provincial Parks and Provincial participation through funding of Authority projects has been provided. '- ,~ WATERSHED PLAN LAND USE /7:7 the metropolitan toronto and region FIG. 3 L/ conservation authority - 21 - 4. DEMANDS ON THE RESOURCE BASE In preparing the program components of this Watershed Plan, the Authority has attempted to ioentify the oemands which will be placed on the resource base in the future and, further, to define where the Authority has the mandate or responsibility to provioe for such demands. As part of each program the Authority has detailed the relevant resource management issues and has proposed a program to address these issues. The following summarizes the major resource management demanos which have been dealt with by the programs: . the need to provide a natural valley system capable of passing flood flows and providing flood storage; . the need to protect community developments which in the past were located on flood-susceptible lands; . the requirement to acquire, in certain instances, land which exhibits physical hazard or environmental significance/ sensitivity in order to prevent inappropriate use; . the need to assist municipalities by providing technical input into the review of development proposals in order to prevent or reduce the impact of land use changes both on-site and in other parts of the watershed; . the need to provide conservation land management on private and public lands through the preparation of Conservation Plans and the availability of conservation assistance and on Authority lands through the development and implementation of management plans; . the requirement to make available for publ ic recreation use those resource management lands acquired by the Authority on which such use is compatible; . the need to provide regional, water-oriented, open space and recreation opportunities for the public along the Lake Ontario waterfront; . the need to conserve and manage heritage resources on Authority lands and to make these resources available to the public; . the need to develop and implement an effective community relations program to inform the watershed community of the goals, policies and programs of the Authority. - 22 - 5. TilE WATERSHED PLAN S.l Introduction The ten programs which comprise the Watershed Plan have been structured as groups of resource management activit:tes which serve a conunon goal but which can be implemented as identifiable management units. In combination, the programs fulfill the Authority's overall legislative mandate, as set out in The Conservation Authorities Act: "TO ESTABLISH AND UNDERTAKE, IN THE AREA OVER WHICH IT HAS JURISDICTION, A PROGRA~I DESIGNED TO FURTHER TilE CONSERVATION, RESTORATION, DEVELOPMEN'r AND MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OTHER THAN GAS, OIL, COAL AND MINERALS. " No single program by itself is "whole" . Each is complementary to the others. Nor is the Plan itself "whole II . It must be considered as contributing to a resource management package in which many public jurisidictions have a part. The Plan is complementary to the planning and management responsibilities of municipalities and several Provincial ministries. The Plan defines what the Authority can contribute, within the limits of its legislation and funding, to the management of resources in the area over which it has jurisdiction. While the separation of conservation activities into ten programs is a convenient mechanism for study, evaluation and management of resources, the Watershed Plan must be used as a package of resource management techniques which are to be applied to the resources of the area under the Authority's jurisidiction. 5.2 The Management of Resources in the Watersheds of The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority The programs and policies of the Watershed Plan are seen as being applied to the major resource areas within the Authority's area of jurisidiction. In general terms, these resources are described as: . the river valleys, both well-defined and ill-defined: . the tributary drainage areas, including the Niagara Escarpment and the Oak Ridges Moraine: . the Lake Ontario Shoreline. The conservation management of these resources, as set out in the Plan, recognizes: . the limitations of the resources to accommodate use and development: . the role of the area within the Authority's jurisdiction in accommodating municipal and Provincial growth Objectives: . the requirement to protect the community from the hazards of flooding and erosion: . the role of resources in contributing to a safe and healthy life for the community; - 23 - the role ,of ot.her pub1 ic jurisdictions in contributing to the management of resources in the re<Jion. 5.2.1 Well-Defined River Valleys In general terms, the well-defined river valleys include river mouth marshes and the lower reaches of the major streams. These streams rise in the Oak Ridges Interlobate Moraine and flow southward across bevelled till plains to the former Lake Iroquois Shoreline and thence to Lake Ontario. Over much of this route, the main tributaries have cut steep sided, deeply incised valleys with a fl ood plain that broadens as the stream flows southward. The well-defined valleys have the following characteristics: . the valley side slopes are steep and are often tree covered; . the valley walls may be unstable; . the flood plain usually has the appearance of being easily distinguished visually from the valley wall; . the flood plain as defined by the Regional Storm will, in many instances, occupy the entire valley floor. Exceptions however will occur where valley formation processes or the activities of man have created a valley floor which lies outside the Regional Storm flood plain. The pOlicies and programs in the Watershed Plan which apply to the well-defined valleys have as their overall thrust, the retention of the well-defined valleys from top of slope to top of slope as natural units capable of passing Regional Flood flows, avoiding development that would be hazardous to life and property, and retaining the opportunity for preservation of the well-defined valleys as public open space areas consistent with municipal official plan pOlicies. The contribution of the Authority's policies and programs to this overall thrust is set out in the Flood Control, Erosion and Sediment Control, Conservation Land Management, Watershed Recreation and Land Acquisition Programs. The preferred strategies ~1ich these Programs represent were selected from a number of alternatives. The continuance of a vigorous Land Acquisition Program would satisfy a large portion of the overall thrust. The initial acquisition costs and the long term management costs of such a program were considered to be beyond the reasonable funding expectations of the Authority and, where substantial portions of communities exist within the well-defined valley system, would create unacceptable disruption to the structure and economic life of the communities. The Land Acquisition Program sets out as the preferred strategy, a definition of hazard and conservation lands which are suitable for acquisition if other means of protection or control are not feasible and makes provision for a cooperative approach to acquisition between municipalities and the Authority where major acquisitions are required to satisfy both municipal and Authority objectives. A thorough analysis of the water storage approach to alleviating flood and erosion hazards within the well-defined valleys was carried out. Although it was found to be important to retain the option for the construction of water - 24 - storage reservoirs as may be required at some time in the future, the analysis clearly indicated that a site spec.i. fic approach to remedial measures had a much more satisfactory cost/benefit ratio and produced fewer environmental problems. The preferred strategy in the Flood Control Program is to carry out remedial measures in definecl flood damage centres which will reduce the risk of flooding to 50% or less over the life of structures in the damage centre. The designation of the flood damage centres as special policy areas under the Province of Ontario's Policy for Flood P~ain Management, will permit regulatory policies which will give further protection and which, in combination with a flood warning system, offers a satisfactory level of flood protection. Analysis revealed that most streambank and valley wall erosion occurs during the more frequent flood events and that major storage reservoirs did not contribute substantially to reducing downstream erosion. For this reason the site specific approach for erosion control is also the preferred strategy. The Erosion and Sediment Control Program identifies the sites most in need of erosion control and recommends remedial measures to be carried out on the basis of technical priorities which recognize the degree of hazard. Under The Conservation Authorities Act the Authority has made and administers regulations applicable in the area under its jurisdiction dealing with fill, construction and alterations to waterways. Within the well-defined valleys these regulations were found to be an important technique contributing to the overall thrust for valley management. Applied in isolation from other management techniques, however, regulation has many inadequacies. Without the flood remedial measures which are recommended for flood damage centres, the application of prohibitive regulations would have a s~vere economic impact on the community and individual property owners. In undeveloped valley areas regulation can prevent, in the short term, development in hazardous areas but does not satisfy public open space requirements, nor does it provide for the public management of environmentally sensitive and significant areas. The preferred strategy which the Plan recommends is the application of regulations made under The Conservation Authorities Act dealing with fill and construction and alterations to waterways, in hazard areas, using specific criteria which will contribute to consistency of application backed up by remedial measures and acquisition where regulation by itself is inadequate. The application of conservation land management techniques including reforestation, shrub planting and stream improvements for fish management and sediment reduction have traditionally been reserved for headwater areas. The option of extending conservation land management programs into the lower well-defined valley areas was examined and substantial benefits were revealed. Many of the well-defined lower valleys have been subject to severe alteration and ap~lication of conservation land management techniques will contribute to valley restoration. The preferred strategy for the Conservation Land Management Program includes the extension of the program into the lower valleys, particularly, in urban areas in cooperation with municipalities. The use of the well-defined valleys for public open space and recreation programs is a well established concept. The options of not managing valley lands for recreation but retaining them as natural areas and of having all - 25 - valley lands managed by the municipalities were examined. Well-define(l valleys can perform a recreational function, hut because of the requirement that they be capable of passing Regional Plood flows and their role as natural corridors, it was determined that intensive forms of recreation which require major structural facilities were incompatible. The question of municipal management of all Authority valley lands was given thorough public discussion as a result of recommendations made in the report of 'the Royal Commission on Metropolitan TOt-onto. The preferred strategy which the Watershed Plan recommends is to permit and encourage the puhlic recreational use of valley lands: to avoid structures which are ancillary to recreation activities in the 100 year flood plain and to identi fy, through more detailed studies, those sections of the valleys which should be reserved from development and retained as environmentally significant areas. The Plan recommends that in the urban and urbanizing areas, municipalities be encouraged to assume the management responsibility of the valley lands, subject to Authority approval of management and development practices. The Plan recommends that further market analysis be done to determine the specific recreation role of lands which the Plan classifies as conservation areas, to be managed by the Authority. It recolTDnends that the remainder of Authority lands be managed as forest and wildlife areas or resource management tracts. The distinction among these latter categories was determined on the basis of physical characteristics and the need and opportunity to provide all season recreation in conservation areas. The Plan makes a commitment to carry out further market research in conjunction with detailed conservation area master planning. The Plan recognizes that conservation areas, because of their location, physical attractiveness, and all- season recreation opportunities, contribute to the recreation 11 fe of the entire community and are not restricted to the benefit of any single municipality. 5.2.2 Ill-Defined River Valleys Ill-defined river valleys are generally distinguished from well-defined river valleys on the basis of size and the side slope characteristics. Typically, an ill-defined valley will slope gently away from the flood plain and will be visually indistinguishable from the flood plain. Valley slopes are typically not wooded and top of slope can be determined only on an arbitrary basis. The thrust of the Watershed Plan with respect to ill-defined valleys is similar to that for well-defined valleys, except that the definition of an ill-defined valley is the Regional flood plain plus ten metres. All of the options for management and preferred strategies which were established for the well-defined valleys apply in the ill-defined valleys, but there is typically more reliance on the application of Fill and Construction and Alterations to Waterways Regulations and less emphasis on land acquisition in the ill-defined valleys. This change in emphasis notwithstanding, the Plan provides for the possibility of acquisition where regulation alone cannot satisfy Authority and municipal objectives. 5.2.3 Mapping The definition of well-defined and ill-defined valleys was developed on the basis of topographic mapping which was prepared for the area under the - 26 - Authority's jurisdiction. Because of the substantial costs involved, the mapping was limited to those watercourses whiCh drain in excess of 1300 hectares. With the exception of works proposed in the Erosion and Sediment Control Program, all of the policies and programs which are applicable to the well-defined and ill-defined valleys are applicable to those unmapped stretches of the watercourses which drain less than 1300 hectares, and greater than 125 hectares. In these unmapped stretches of the streams the programs will be applied on the basis of mapping to be prepared, as required, by the Authority or any other proponent of works. In areas draining less than 125 hectares policies pertaining to the Authority's Conservation Land Management and Watershed Recreation Programs will apply. 5.2.4 The Tributary Drainage Area The thrust of the Watershed Plan, as it deals with the tributary drainage areas of watercourses, is to have a positive impact on the quality and quantity of water that drains from the land. Clearly, this aspect of the Watershed Plan deals with land use which is a municipal responsibility. For this reason, the land use figures in the Plan are estimates of potential patterns to the year 2000 A.D. and are based on information provided fr.om a number of sources, primarily municipal planning documents. The land uses shown in the Plan were used to estimate potential runoff and erosion rates and to formulate land management proposals. The showing, in the Plan, of lands which are now urban or which are likely to be urban, based on municipal.plans, does not constitute an Authority endorsement of land use change. The programs which contribute to the thrust of the Watershed Plan with respect to the headwater zones are Storm Water Management and Conservation Land Management. The options which the Authority reviewed dealing with the headwater zones were: . to rely on its ability to comment on development proposals through the municipal planning process: . to establish and undertake a Storm Water Management Program: . to foster a program of conservation land management on both public lands and private lands. As with the options which existed for management of the river valley system, no single option was found to be entirely adequate by itself. To simply rely on the municipal planning process and comment on development proposals would be inadequate because the Authority has important expertise and information systems which can contribute to urban and rural design. To concentrate solely on the programs which apply on private and public lands and not be involved in the municipal planning process, is similarly inadequate. Municipal planning control, expertise and legislative jurisdiction is essential to the management of drainage areas. Many new concepts in the management of storm water which will reduce flood flows and improve water quality, are being given consideration in almost all public and private sectors concerned with land development. Storm water drainage is primarily a municipal matter: however, again the Authority has - 27 - important expertise and information which should be available to municipalities in order that unnecessary ouplication of effort does not occur. The preferred strategy set out in the Watersheo Plan is a combination of all three options applied in a manner which will respect the municipal planning responsibilities, which will make available to public and private landowners Authority expertise in conservation land planning, and which will bring a conservation ethic to land use planning decisions. The impact of development on the resourcp.s of the region, especially the impact of land use changes which occur in the upstream portions of the tributary drainage area are of interest because alterations in these areas can ha ve effects throughout the watershed. Planning objectives conunon to a 11 jurisdictions should include: . the maintenance and enhancement of water-related functions, including source areas and aquifer recharge: . the maintenance and enhancement of fish and wildlife habitat, particularly, cold water streams: . the protection of land from wind and water erosion as a result of poor land management practices, including lack of preventative measures during construction: . the maintenance of Class 1 to Class 4 agricultural lands in agricultural use, as much as possible: . the maintenance of the visual amenities and other greenspace functions of natural habitats and landforms in close proximity to the developing urban area. Land use proposals in the tributary drainage areas should take into consideration the following: . changes in natural drainage of tributary streams and intermittent watercourses should be minimized. The elimination of such watercourses and of wetland areas through piping, channelization, filling or draining should be discouraged: . development should pe set back from wetlands, lakes and streams in order to ensure protection of water bodies from water quality damage: . disturbance to natural vegetation should be minimized, particularly, adjacent to streams with cold water fishing potential: . removal of existing tree cover or other stabilizing vegetation should be minimized on all lands with potential for wind or water erosion. Re-vegetation will be encouraged where existing erosion occurs: . development over major recharge areas and aquifers should minimize the use of non-porous surfaces in order to maintain infiltration: . the Authority should cooperate with, and support other agencies in reviewing, development proposals to ensure these concerns are addressed and that development controls are - 28 - utilized to reduce potential impacts. All 0 f these considerations are important for any proposed development. They are of particular importance in those areas shown on the Authority's Watershed Plan map as not being predominantly rural. The concept of storm water management forms an important new component for the Authority in its watershed management work. Because of the municipalities' legislative responsibility for management of storm drainage, no other option for dealing with storm water management was considered. The Storm Water Management Program recommends the Authority's role as being: . an advocate of good storm water management practice, including the adoption of the major/minor system approach to storm drainage, with the minor system carrying up to and including the 2 year storm event, and the major system designed to carry the Regional Storm event or the 1:100 year event, whichever is the greater; . the preparation of a master drainage plan by the Authority which sets out for the municipalities, drainage management objectives on a watershed basis; . the preference for natural channel designs; . the fostering of strong public and provincial support for storm water management concepts. The Storm Water Management Program is given strong support in the Conservation Land Management Program which has as a preferred strategy, the employing of a variety of techniques which will encourage landowners, both public and private, to employ good land use practices. This program recommends that the Authority provide landowners, on a request basis, with conservation plans for their lands and that the plans be supported with assistance works including reforestation, wildlife shrub plantings, stream improvements and woodlot management. The program recognizes that the landowners do have options in seeking advice services with the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Different emphases in all of these assistance programs provide the landowner with a wide, but clear choice, in seeking the service which he requires. 5.2.5 The Lake Ontario Shoreline For the purposes of the Watershed Plan the Lake Ontario Shoreline is defined as a longitudinal strip of land and water area extending southward from the lakeshore arterial roads to the international boundary, over the Authority's area of jurisdiction which extends from the Etobicoke Creek in the west to the Carruthers Creek in the east. The thrust of the programs which are directed to this resource are to provide safety from the hazards of erosion and flooding in shoreline areas and to provide public access and recreation opportunities appropriate to the shoreline setting. Two programs, Shoreline Management and - 29 - Lake Ontario Waterfront Development, contribute to the management of the Lake Ontario Shoreline resource. The Authority's recreation and open space work along the Lake Ontario Shoreline has been based on the Waterfront Plan which was prepared for the Metropolitan Toronto Planning Area by the former Metropolitan Toronto Planning Board. This Plan has been updated on two separate occasions - in 1971 when the Authority's first Waterfront Plan was adopted and in 1977 when the second phase of the Waterfront Plan was adopted. Since the Plan had been recently rethought, the policies and objectives as set out in the Plan, with some modification, have been included in these programs. In addition to the planning which the Waterfront Plan represented, alternatives in two important areas were considered. In determining the role that water storage could play in the Flood Control Program, the ancillary benefit of water-oriented recreation opportunities which flood control reservoirs represent, was considered and compared with water-oriented recreation opportunities which the Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program represents. For a variety of reasons, including the accessibility of waterfront areas to large concentrations of population, the wider scope of water-oriented activities which the Lake Ontario Shoreline represented, and the limitations which the management of water storage reservoirs for flood control purposes placed on the use of the reservoir for recreation, the Authority concluded that the community would be most advantageously served if water resource recreation opportunities were developed along the Lake Ontario Shoreline in preference to additional water storage reservoirs. Secondly, since shoreline management, including erosion control, did not have a large place in the original waterfront plans, the option of the Authority dealing with this important management activity in a separate program and giving it substantial emphasis, was considered. Because of the Authority's extensive experience in shoreline work and the urgent need for action which erosion studies indicated in certain areas of the shoreline, and the lack of another agency equipped to deal with the matter, a Shoreline Management Program is included in the Watershed Plan. The preferred strategy for the Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program addresses itself to the creation of open space areas across the waterfront which will provide for a range of active and passive water-oriented activities for the people of the region. These activities include the development of a diverse sport fishery in cooperation with the Ministry of Natural Resources, the development of small craft safe anchorages at intervals along the shoreline and the preservation of the remaining river mouth marsh areas. The preferred strategy for the Shoreline Management Program emphasizes the control of erosion which occurs as a result of wave action and priority will be given to the most endangered areas of the Scarborough Bluffs. The studies carried out by the Authority indicated that shoreline management would best be carried out in design blocks which would enable the protection of natural units of the shoreline as opposed to individual properties. 5.2.6 Public Information An important component of the resource management techniques which will be - 30 - applied to all the resources in the area under the Authority 's jurisdiction is the provision of public information opportunities. The thrust of this technique is to develop an informed public on conservation matters and to develop public attitudes which are supportive of the conservation ethic. The provision of public information opportunities is addressed in the Community Relations Program. The options considered for the public information program were options which pertained to techniques and the audiences to be reached as opposed to looking at alternatives to a public information program. This approach was predicated on the belief that a public agency is obligated to have a public information program. The traditional Authority information program has been one of general information brochures, reports of activities, news releases and multi-media presentations. All of these have been directed to a very general audience. In the course of the preparation of the information program and the public participation in that preparation, it became clear tha t a second option, that of directing Authority information to specific audiences (the engineering profession, landowners adjacent to river valleys, municipal and provincial legislators and similar specific groups that have a direct interest in Authority work) had to be considered. The preferred strategy which the Watershed Plan recommends is that the general information be continued but that increased emphasis be placed on a public information program directed at special audiences. Alternatives were also considered with respect to the Authority's conservation education program. Since its inception, the Authority has conducted its conservation education program in a variety of ways. .In the early years, most of the Authority's program was conducted through its conservation field centres which provide for residential conservation education experiences, in facilities owned and operated by the Authority on Authority-owned lands. Public hikes and educational tours in a variety of watershed locations also formed a part of the program. More recently, the Authority has been assisted in the provision of conservation education field centres by school board funding supplied for capital construction of field centre facilities. Educational tours and field trips have tended to be concentrated in the recently opened Kortright Centre for Conservation. During the plan preparation process considerable study and discussion was given to proposals by individual school boards to construct and operate their own facilities on Authority lands. The preferred strategy which the Watershed Plan recommends is to continue the policy of providing conservation education field centres on a cooperative basis with the school boards. This strategy will ensure that no single board has exclusive use of any one facility, thereby ensuring that the variety of experiences which are available at the different conservation educati()n sites will continue to be availahle to all students within the school system. The Plan recognizes that the need for conservation education opportunities in the school system is not presently being met and recommends additional cooperative facilities at Albion Hills, the Boyd Conservation Education Complex and the Claremont Forest and Wildlife Area. The Plan recommends that the public conservation education opportunities continue to be concentrated at the KOrtright Centre for Conservation. In so doing, quality experiences can be provided at reasonable - 31 - cost. It will continue to be the policy of the Authority that conoervation education opportunities in connection with all its programs and all its facilities be available. 5.2.7 The Heritage Resource Included in all of the major resource areas which the Authority manages is the opportunity to recognize and contribute to the conservation of the region's heritage resources. Included in all of the programs which make up the Watershed Plan is the commitment to conduct an environmental review as a part of the planning for the program, and in accordance with the requirements of The Environmental Assessment Act. The heritage resources which may exist will be identi fied and their management addressed. This commitment includes recognition of historic sites, buildings and archaeological sites. The preferred strategy which the Plan recommends is to recognize and contribute to the conservation of the region's heritage resources, placing emphasis on those which contribute to an understanding of resource management. The Heritage Conservation Program deals with the management of this resource. It is incumbent on a public landowner to be aware of the heritage resources represented by its lands and structures and to arrange for their recognition. This has been the traditional approach of the Authority and the Plan recommends that it continue. 5.2.8 Structure of the Authority as it Relates to Planning The manner in which the Authority is structured to conduct its business is set out in Section 2.2 of this Plan. All of the component programs were rev iewed at various stages of draft proposals by the appropriate Functional Advisory Boards. The Watershed Advisory Boards, which are issue oriented on a watershed basis, as opposed to program oriented, performed the important function of reviewing the program components on a watershed basis and recommending the balance of emphasis that should exist among the programs which make up the Plan. It was in the Watershed Advisory Board review process that the alternatives among programs were reviewed and the preferred strategies recommended. Within the staff structure of the Authority provision is made for a Planning and Policy Committee on which technical divisions are represented. The role of the Planning and Policy Committee was to review the input to the programs by Authority staff, consultants, comments from municipalities, the Province of Ontario and citizen groups. Based on this input, the role that each component of the Plan should play in achieving overall watershed management was established. It was in the Planning and Policy Committee that the alternative strategies were evaluated. 5.2.9 The Watershed Plan Programs The sections of this chapter which follow provide a summary of each of the ten programs which make up the Watershed Plan. A complete program document has been prepared for each program and is bound separately from this Plan. For complete details the program documents should be referred to. Selected program graphics have been included in an appendix to this Plan. . ., , . t' ~ ;" .," ":I~' 'V,~~~~~!nW"'t'~lr!'"'' '... ,2':1<J:"II.:;~l ~, i~'h~'."'I~!: , I 5.3 FLOOD CONTROL PROGRAM Flood plain management is the planning and implementation of measures intended to balance the needs of nature for flood water conveyance and flood storage with the demands of the community for use of the valley system. The Authority, through its Flood Control Program, will continue to implement comprehensive flood plain management including the construction of protective works, the acquisition of flood plain lands (see Land Acquisition Program), and the application of regulations adopted under Section 27(l) of The Conservation Authorities Act. 5.3.1 Policy The goal of the Authority's Flood Control Program is: TO UNDERTAKE A COMPREHENSIVE PROG~1 OF FLOOD CONTROL DESIGNED TO PREVENT, ELIMINATE, OR REDUCE THE RISK OF HAZARD TO LIFE AND PROPERTY, WHILE COGNIZANT OF THE NATURAL ATTRIBUTES OF THE VALLEY SYSTEM. In order to achieve this goal, the Authority has established the following objectives: (a) Under The Conservation Authorities Act the Authority has made and will continue to administer regulations applicable in the area under its jurisdiction dealing with the placing of fill, construction, and alterations to waterways in flood susceptible areas in order to prevent the creation of additional flood prone development. The administration of regulations will be in accordance with technical criteria devised to minimize future damage and to avoid the accumulative loss of storage which occurs through encroachment on the flood plain~ (b) to recognize as suitable for acquisition, those lands which are susceptible to flooding under the Regional Storm and to acquire, within this category, such lands as may be necessary in order to have maximum control over their ability to safely accommodate flood flows and protect available flood storage~ ( c) to maintain a flood warning and forecasting system which will provide the earliest possible warning to the Authority's municipalities regarding an impending flood hazard~ (d) to provide in defined flood damage centres, on a priority basis, protection that will reduce the risk of flooding to less than 50% over the life (100 years) of the affected structure(s). Protection to a higher level will be provided if economically and/or socially justified~ - 33 - (e) to seek the cooperation of municipalities in preventing the creation of new flood prone development through the incorporation of appropriate statements and designations concerning flood hazard areas in Official Plans and secondary plans (or their equivalent), and, to ultimately restrict development in such flood hazard areas through the enactment of restricted area bylaws (zoning) and/or development control bylaws: ( f) to provide the municipalities with flood hazard information on which to base municipal land use controls and standards for flood plains; ( g) to recognize the value of the natural valley system in the design and construction of all protective works and to maintain the natural character, where feasible; (h) to maintain an up to date data gathering system which will enable the Authority to provide accurate water management information to assist in the design and operation of Authority, municipal and private water management measures and to incorporate improved technologies as they become available; (1) to maintain flood control structures as required in order that they can continue to perform as designed. 5.3.2 Program Description The objectives of the Flood Control Program will be accomplished through the continued implementation of preventative and protective measures. To prevent the creation of additional flood prone development, the Authority will review development proposals on the basis of the following criteria: A) UNDEVELOPED FLOOD PLAINS ( a) In the application of its regulations for flood control, the Authority has mapped and plotted the flood plain for those watercourses draining 1300 hectares or greater. For development proposals in proximity to watercourses draining less than 1300 hectares, the Authority may require the proponent to provide the flood plain information. (b) Occupation of the flood plain for activities which do not require alteration to the flood plain and which do not interfere with the primary function of the flood plain are considered suitable. The fOllowing land uses are representative of appropriate activities: - agriculture - outdoor recreation/open space - gardens/nurseries/arboretums - other similar nonstructural uses. - 34 - Structures or buildings required for or associated with tl1ese activities may be permitted in the flood plain but must be located outside the 100 year flood zone provided that no potential for loss of life or substantial structural damage connected with such structures exists. ( c) In keeping with the overall Authority objective of maintaining the valleys in a natural state, the use of flood plains for parking lots will be discouraged. However, if the need to utilize flood plains for parking lot purposes can be demonstrated, then parking lots must be located outside of the 100 year flood zone, and, in addition, must meet other parking lot criteria established by the Authority which takes into account flow velocity and depth of flooding. Further, the construction of parking lots cannot involve the introduction of fill material so as to raise the elevation of the parking lot to conform to Authority criteria. (d) It is recognized that certain utilities or services such as storm and sanitary sewers, natural gas or oil pipelines, hydro corridors, foot pa ths and transportation links will, from time to time, be required to cross or use the flood plain. Such uses should not impede flood flows or be located in such a manner as to cause adverse effects to the flood plain upstream or downstream. (i) The construction of pipe or service lines should maintain the predevelopment configuration of t~e flood plain and minimize disturbance to existing vegetation. Pipe or service lines parallel to the flood plain should be constructed and protected so as to prevent scouring and possible failure at a later date. In addition, storm sewer outfalls should be designed to provide adequate protection to the river banks. ( ii) Where feasible, bridge or structural abutments should be located outside of the flood plain to minimize obstruction to water flow. (Hi) '~ere structures are necessary within the flood plain the structure should be designed so that overtopping or flanking can occur with a minimum of damage. Major bridges not designed for the Regional Flood should have their approach ramp(s) designed as spillways. Smaller footbridges should be designed to withstand blockage and allow for spill. (e) Spill zones occur in areas where the valley is ill-defined resulting in a broad, uncontained exit for flood waters. As a consequence, it is extremely difficult to accurately determine the limit or depth of flooding. The exact delineation of the flood plain for a spi 11 zone shall be determined by the Authority on a site specific basis. The artificial delineation of this flood plain will take into account the average width - 35 - of the natural flood plain upstream and downstream, and, possible upstream and downstream effects. Development will not be permitted in the defined flood plain except fur those activities identified previously. Prior to development in the remaining portion of the spill zone, that area should be protected to the level defined by the Regional Storm. No new development will be permitted until protective works have been installed to the ~atisfaction of the Authority. B) DEVELOPED FLOOD PLAINS Flood plain areas on which there is a concentration of development which forms an integral part of an existing community have been defined by the Authority as flood damage centres. As such, acquisition of entire damage centres is considered to be economically and/or socially unacceptable. Therefore, infilling, additions, or redevelopment may occur in damage centres subject to the following criteria: (a) The location and extent of damage centres will be determined by the Authority in consultation with the appropriate municipality(ies)~ (b) Within a damage centre, all new structures or buildings must be protected to the degree that the risk of flooding is no higher than that established by policy. As a general guideline, structures or buildings will ~tbe subjected to flooding under the Regional Storm. However, where it is demonstrated that this level of protection is technically not achievable, then as a minimum, structures or buildings will not be subjected to a risk of flooding over their assumed life of 100 years, in excess of 25%. Several flood damage reduction techniques can be applied to achieve this level of risk, including fill, elimination of openings, and strengthening of foundations: (c) Notwithstanding criterion (b) , no development, redevelopment or additions will be permitted where they will be subjected to flows which due to their velocity and/or depth would be a hazard to life or susceptible to major structural damage as a result of a flood less than or equal to the Regional Storm~ (d) For the development or redevelopment of all or part of a damage centre that is also a spill zone, the spill zone should be protected to reduce the risk of flooding to the required level prior to any development or redevelopment. Every attempt should be made in the grading of spill zones to allow for the passage of flood water through streets without adverse effects on buildings. In addition to Flood Damage Centres, other smaller susceptible areas exist consisting of a single affected structure or a small group of structures. These areas have been designated as Flood Vulnerable Areas. - 36 - Flood Vulnerable Areas will be addressed in the following manner: Flood Vulnerable Areas: subject to a cost/benefit analysis, and the requirements or considerations of any other Authority Program(s), residential, co~nercial or industrial structures will be acquired or protected to the level of the Regional Storm, over the long term, on a priority basis which is dependent on degree of risk. In these areas, no infilling, additions or redevelopment should be permitted. The majority of sites designated as Flood Damage Centres can be protected using site specific remedial measures. Lands previously purchased by the Authority as locations for dams and reservoirs will be retained in the event that they may be required in the future. These lands will be managed ~a manner which will not reduce their potential as reservoir sites. The Authority will also continue to operate and improve its flood warning and forecasting system as a protective measure. Funding for the Flood Control Program will be based on 55% from the Province in grants and 45% Authority funds, raised through a levy on the member municipalities. The levy for the preventative review of proposals, the implementation of the flood warning and forecasting system, and the maintenance of capital works will be based on all municipalities designated as benefiting and apportioned according to equalized assessment. The levy for the capital cost of flood control remedial works will be assigned to the municipality where the works are located. - 37 - 5.4 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PROGRAM The Authority will continue to implement a program designed to minimize the aggravation or creation of erosion and sediment problems through a combination of preventative and protective measures. Both erosion and sedimentation are naturally occurring physical processes, however, the changes induced by man's activities can result in significant acceleration. The Authority will attempt to prevent the development of future problems and, where a hazard currently exists, may provide protective works or acquire endangered property (see Land Acquisition Program). 5.4.1 Policy The goal of the Authority's Erosion and Sediment Control Program is: TO MINIMIZE THE HAZARDS OF EROSION TO LIFE AND PROPERTY, AND TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF THE STREAMS AND LAKES THROUGH SELECTIVE CONTROLS ON SEDIMENT SOURCES. In order to achieve this goal, the following objectives have been identified: (a) Under The Conservation Authorities Act the Authority has made and will continue to administer regulations applicable in the area under its jurisidiction dealing with the placing of fill in designated erosion hazard areas to prevent the occurrence of further erosion damage: (b) to seek the cooperation of municipalities in preventing the creation of new erosion prone development through the incorporation of appropriate statements and designations concerning erosion hazard areas in Official Plans and secondary plans (or their equivalent), and, to ultimately control development in such hazard areas through the enactment of restricted area bylaws (zoning) and/or development control bylaws: ( c) to seek the cooperation of municipalities in making the preparation of an erosion-sediment control plan a condition of approval for draft plan of subdivision: (d) to cooperate with municipalities and landowners during the design of urban \,; drainage systems so as to incorporate into these systems mechanisms for controlling increases in flow and sediment: ( e) to implement a program of major and minor remedial works for the control of erosion and sediment loss: ( f) to recognize the importance of the natural valley character in the design of remedial works wherever feasible: (g) to continue to update and augment the current state of the art regarding erosion and sediment control in the Authority's jurisdiction. - 38 - 5.4.2 Program nescription In carrying out the preventative component of this Program, the Authority will review development proposals on the basis of the following criteria: (a) For lands immediately adjacent to valleys, buildings or structures (including paved surfaces), whether situated above or below ground level, should not be permitted in the following erosion impact zones unless studies by a competent professional show that the structures will be safe during their life, which for Authority purposes is 100 years, and tha t the buildings or structures will not aggravate or create erosion problems: - 10 meters back from the top of bank where a stable, defined valley exists: - - 10 meters back from a projected 2H:IV slope where an unstable, defined valley exists: and - 10 meters back from the Regional Storm floodline where an ill-defined valley exists. NOTE: Unless shown to be otherwise, the average stable slope is assumed to be 2H:lV. (b) Surface drainage from any building, structure or paved surface should not be permitted to be discharged over the valley wall. Such surface drainage should be directed away from the face of the valley wall or appropriately piped to the base of the valley wall. ( c) The municipalities be encouraged to have Master Drainage Plans (as described in the Storm Water Management Program) prepared for developing areas which will then be complied with as the individual subdivisions or developments are undertaken. ( d) In conjunction with the municipalities and other appropriate agencies, the Authority shall endeavour to have storm water management methods incorporated into new development. Such methods could include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: . - temporary storage of rainfall on flat roofs, parking lots - detention storage ponds - in pipe storage - diversion of rain water leaders on to grassed areas. (e) The preparation of an erosion-sediment control plan should include mechanisms designed to maximize on site sediment control during active construction. Such mechanisms could include but not necessarily be limited to the following: - 39 - - temporary vegetation of stock-piled earth and exposed construction sites - retention of vegetation buffer strips - diversion ditches for runoff - sediment traps and basins - temporary drainage contouring - straw bale filters, particularly in proximity to watercourses - storm water management. (f) The Authority shall endeavour to increase public awareness of the problems of erosion control and sediment reduction by disseminating information and providing technical advice, where appropriate. In implementing the protective component of the Program, the following operational criteria will be used as a guide: (a) Watercourses or parts thereof on which the erosion protection works set out in this Program are applicable are generally those which drain an area equal to or greater than 1300 hectares. Watercourses which do not meet this specific criterion but which in the opinion of the Authority have physical characteristics which require the~r inclusion for Erosion Control works have been included. These streams include the Newtonbrook Creek to Finch Avenue and the Centennial Creek to Kingston Road. Watercourses or parts thereof which generally drain an area less than 1300 hectares shall be the responsibility of the municipalities for the undertaking of erosion protection works. (b) Except where defined otherwise, top of valley slope to top of valley slope shall be described as the area in which the Authority will undertake remedial works to control erosion and sediment loss. (c) In assessing the severity of an erosion problem, a priority or ranking shall be given to each site. The priorities shall then serve as the basis for the development of an annual erosion works program. A priority shall be based on technical criteria including, but not necessarily limi ted to the following: - distance from top of bank to structure - extent of seepage - ground water conditions - steepness of slope and height - soil composition - vegetative cover, type and extent - evidence of previous movement The procedures, parameters and weighting factors that contribute toward s the establishment of a priority system shall be periodically reviewed to ensure - 40 - the inclusion of new ideas and techniques. (d) For the purposes of erosion protection works, design blocks shall he established and works undertaken on a design block basis. Design blocks shall be of a size to be technically and economically feasible. (e) \fhere erosion protection work is proposed on private land, the Authority shall require title to the land or an easement where applicable, and/or require a suitable financial contribution from the benefiting owner(s). ( f) Erosion protection works will be analysed on the basis of cost/benefit, with acquisition cost being used as a principal determining factor. (g) Design criteria for erosion protection works are dependent upon the nature of each specific problem. Generally two types of problems exist, the first, and less common type, involves a bank or valley wall instability, in which slumping or major rotational failure is involved due to inherent soil ,conditions or overloading of the bank. The more common type of problem involves the river in coincidence with a valley wall. Wherever possible, erosion control work shall be designed to: - accommodate the 100 year flood for the 'coincident case' - accommodate the 10 year flow, in all other cases as a minimum, based on the ultimate development of the watershed - permit channel overtopping with minimal damage to the remedial work - decrease the velocity of the stream by flattening the hydraulic gradient and minimizing the flow energy - by incorporating meanders and/or controlled drop structures - increase roughness of the watercourse by a wide selection of design materials - consider park/open space plans of other public agencies in the design of remedial works. (h) In assessing the severity of sediment loss problems, a priority or ranking shall be given to each site. The priorities shall then serve as the basis for the development of annual sediment reduction programs. A priority shall be based on technical criteria including, but not necessarily limited to the following: - physical extent of the problem - amount of material reaching the watercourse - soil composition - steepness of slope and height, if applicable. The procedures, parameters and weighting factors that contribute towards the establishment of a priority system shall be periodically reviewed to ensure the inclusion of new ideas and techniques. - 41 - (i) In the design of all protection works, the Authority or any other. proponent shall be cognizant of the natural surroundings and shall endeavour to provide ancillary benefits, where appropriate. ( j) In order to minimize the impact of remedial works on the valley ecosystem, an 'Environmental Inventory' shall be undertaken prior to the initiation of any works. Included in the inventory are: - site description - dominant overstory, understory and ground cover - percent of cover types - fauna species and habitat areas - aquatic data (where applicable) includes benthic, sediment and chemical analysis - significant features and/or species - disturbances - evaluation of site and proposed access - recommendations considered as input to the planning, design and implementation of the proposed work. Funding for the Erosion and Sediment Control Program will be based on a 55% Provincial grant with the remaining 45% raised by a levy on the Authority's member municipalities. - 42 - 5.5 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Storm water management may be defined as the planning, analysis and control of storm water runoff to achieve specified objectives. In the past, the objective for handling storm drainage was to remove the surface water from developed areas as quickly as possible. Wh il e such practice ensured local convenience, it increasingly resulted in downstream flooding and erosion and thus the need for remedial works programs. The objective of storm water management, on the other hand, is to control storm water in upstream areas near its source and to regulate its discharge to the watercourses so as to minimize or present adverse impacts. The Authority recognizes that sound storm water management can only be achieved through municipal/Authority cooperation. The Authority's Storm Water Management Program reflects this need and presents the preparation of master drainage plans as a formal means by which such cooperation may be achieved. \ 5.5.1 Policy It is1the goal of the Authority's Storm Water Management Program to: PROMOTE SOUND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WHICH WILL ENSURE ADEQUATE FLOOD AND EROSION PROTECTION, AND WILL ENHANCE THE ENVIRONMENTAL, AESTHETIC, AND RECREATIONAL POTENTIAL OF URBAN WATERCOURSES. To achieve this goal, the following objectives have been defined: (a) To endeavour to ensure that the management of storm water be given early consideration in the planning and development of new urban areas. (b) To encourage the municipalities to include in Official Plans, particularly for developing areas, statements supporting the concept of and need for storm water management, and, the preparation of master drainage plans at a comprehensive scale at the appropriate time in the planning process. (c) To cooperate with municipalities in the preparation of master drainage plans. (d) To ensure that master drainage plans are prepared in accordance with the valley management, flood control, and erosion and sediment control pOlicies and programs of the Authority. - 43 - (e) With regards to objective (d) , to formulate design criteria for the major system so as to prevent damage as a result of surface flooding, and for the minor system 50 as to minimize downstream erosion and sediment problems. ( f) To encourage the use of . storm water management facilities which are practical, beneficial, and which take into account environmental and aesthetic considerations. (g) To encourage an awareness of the concepts and benefits of storm water management and its relationship to other Authority water management programs. 5.5.2 Program Description The successful implementation of a comprehensive storm water management program can only be realized if the concept and the broad objectives are identified in municipal official plans. In so doing, the municipal planning process would become the framework through which storm water management would be implemented. The Authority recognizes that areas within its jurisdiction are considered to be "fully urbanized", as such, the application of storm water management would be somewhat limited. Conversely, with municipalities which are not considered to be "fully urbanized", particularly the upper portions of the watersheds within the Authority's jurisdiction, the full application of storm water management is possible. A major principle of storm water management is the minimization of impacts on the system as a whole as a result of new development. As the Authority is based on watershed and not political boundaries, the Authority would appear best suited to fill the "overview" role. Since a municipality controls land use and storm drainage, it would appear best suited to determine specific impacts as a result of any development proposal. In implementing storm water management the Authority is proposing a two part Master Drainage Plan. Part I of the Master Drainage Plan would be the watershed overview and would be the responsibility of the Authority. Part II of the Master Drainage Plan would implement storm water management as part of development proposals based on design criteria and constraints identified in Part I and would be the responsibility of the local municipality. In preparing Part I of a Master Drainage Plan on a watershed basis, the Authority would address five major areas - flood control, erosion control, water quality, base flow, and environmental. As a result of a watershed inventory, the Authority would identify any constraints or development criteria that would be required. In order to provide early inclusion of storm water management in the planning process, the Authority is of the opinion that Part II of a Master Drainage Plan should be prepared as part of the Secondary Plan (or equivalent) process. - 44 - Alternatively, Part II of a Master Drainage Plan could be prepared on a portion of a watercourse or a tributary. The function of Part II of a Master Drainage Plan should be to determine any impacts of proposed development on Part I and to identify how the impacts would be mitigated through a comprehensive storm water management system. With Part II of a Master Drainage Plan in place, the appropriate portions of the storm water management system could then be included in the more detailed planning processes of plan of subdivision and site plan preparation. The Authority has established several operational criteria which it feels are necessary to achieve water management goals and objectives and which should be considered in any master drainage plan exercise: - the minor or 'convenience' system should be designed to control to predevelopment conditions, all fl ows up to and including the 2 year storm, as a minimum. However, if as a result of the preparation of a Master Drainage Plan Part II, a more desirable level of control is determined, then that design event would be utilized: - all major drainage system components, irrespective of drainage area, be designed to accommodate the greater of the 1 in 100 year or the Regional storms post-development surface flows. The criteria for controlling flows in the major system should be determined through the master drainage planning process: - the Authority encourages the use of natural channel design concepts. The basic aim of natural channel design is to create a stream channel analogous to a configuration Which would occur under natural conditions. In general, this means tr.at the channel is constructed as a meandering low flow channel within a floodway: - flood plains that would result from the greater of the 1 in 100 year or Regional storms would have to be defined for predevelopment alld post-development conditions. In this regard, the Authority is concerned about increases in peak flows, where the cumulative effect of such increases would adversely impact upstream or downstream conditions. The Authority recognizes that the preparation of master drainage plans cannot occur instantaneously, nor can planning and development be haulted until such plans have been prepared. In tile absence of master drainage plans, the following is suggested to serve as a guide: - where a Secondary Plan (or equivalent) is being prepared and a Master Drainage Plan Part I does not exist, then the intent of Part I should be adhered to as much as possible in the preparation of a Master Drainage Plan Part II. In thi s - 45 - regard, the Authority would provide any existing Part I data to the local municipality as input to the process: - where a plan of subdivision is being prepared and a Master Drainage Plan Part I and Part II does not exist, then sound storm water management techniques should be incorporated into the plan of subdivision, where appropriate. Such techniques should include the preparation of an erosion/sediment control plan as a condition of draft plan approval; - where development is proposed and a Master Drainage Plan does not exist, the minor system should be designed to control to predevelopment conditions, all flows up to and including the 2 year storm, as a minimum; - where development is proposed and a Master Drainage Plan does not exist, the major system should be designed to control to predevelopment conditions, all peak flows up to and including the 100 year flood. If a proponent wishes to pass post-development peak flows that are greater than the corresponding predevelopment peak flows, he then must be able to prove that the cumulative effect of such an increase would have no adverse impact upstream or downstream. Funding for the Storm Water Management Program will be based on a 55% Provincial grant with the remaining 45% raised by the Authority through a levy on its member municipalities. - 46 - 5.6 LAND ACQUISITION PROGRAM The Authority will continue to define, within its area of jurisdiction, certain headwater, valley and waterfront lands as suitable for acquisition. Within the Land Acquisition Program, the areas included are defined as hazard and conservation lands. The designation of lands which may be acquired under this Program, does not limit purchase of property under other programs, including those required to implement the open space and recreational objectives of the Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program. In addition, the Authority may adopt special projects for the acquisition of specific properties beyond those identified in the Watershed Plan, where municipal and provincial interest and funding is designated. 5.6.1 Policy The goal of the Authority's Land Acquisition Program is: TO ACQUIRE HAZARD AND CONSERVATION LAND IN ORDER TO PROTECT IT AGAINST UNWISE LAND USE WHICH WOULD AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE LAND TO PERFORM ITS NATURAL FUNCTIONS, AND TO CONSERVE SIGNIFICANT AND SENSITIVE LAND FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PEOPLE OF THE REGION. The objective of the Program will be to recognize the suitability for acquisition of: (a) those hazard lands which are defined as being flooded by the Regional Storm. (b) those lands which, due to physical hazards of slope instability and/or unstable soils, are not suitable for development: ( c) those conservation lands of a significant and/or sensitive natural character which are best managed by a public agency to retain their natural characteristics. ( d) subject to suitable arrangements, those lands which when combined with hazard and conservation lands are identified from time to time by the Authority in cooperation with member municipalities of the Province of Ontario as being complimentary to hazard and conservation land acquisitions. Properties specifically required for the Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program and the Watershed Recreation Program would be acquired under those respective programs. - 47 - 5.6.2 Program Description Hazard lands are those susceptible to a specified risk from flooding or erosion. The Authority may acquire such hazard lands as described in the following areas: (i) those lands defined by the flood plain of the Regional Storm generally draining in excess of 1300 hectares: ( H) those lands along the waterfront defined by the lOO year flood level plus wave uprush: ( Hi) those lands along the river valleys generally draining in excess of 1300 hectares or along the waterfront which, due to hazards of unstable slopes or soils, make them undevelopable or untenable if already developed. Conservation lands are significant or sensitive areas requiring public protection in order to retain their natural character and/or water related function. The Authority may acquire certain conservation lands, including: (i) those significant valley lands generally draining in excess of 1300 hectares and waterfront lands which warrant conservation. These lands generally lie between the flood limit and top of bank: ( H) those lands which are environmentally sensitive that abut or lie within a valley, the waterfront or are part of the headwater zone, and should not be altered. Designation of these lands will be on the basis of criteria adopted by the Authority and will emphasize water related or hydrologic characteristics. Acquisition under this Program will be affected by the availability of properties on the market and of funds for purchase. High priorities will be in areas of hazard: in areas where urbanization is beginning to encroach: and as a preventative measure. Management of lands acquired under this Program must reflect their natural resource needs and are addressed in the Conservation Land Management and Watershed Recreation Programs. Funding will be based on a 55% Provincial grant with the remaining 45% raised by the Authority through a levy of its member municipalities. The following will determine the basis of the levy: ( a) generally benefiting (all municipalities contributing on an equalized assessment basis) - all riverine flood plain land: the benefits of these go beyond municipal boundaries - all environmentally sensitive land: truly sensitive lands are of - 48 - benefit to the people of the entire region and the generations to come - significant valley and waterfront lands: these are significant features within the Authority's region and contribute to the quality of life in the Authority's jurisdiction as a whole. (b) benefiting municipality (specific municipality contributing as the major part of the benefit is for a limited ~.) - erosion-related sites: the acquisition of these areas varies with each regional municipality and is dependent on interest in erosion control and extent of the problem - waterfront flood-vulnerable areas: flooding on the waterfront is related to site specific features and there is no benefit to adjacent municipalities - other valley or waterfront lands: depending on the extent, certain valley or waterfront land may be particularly important to acquire from a municipal point of view: where there is special benefit to a municipality, it should contribute the full Authority share. - 49 - 5.7 CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT The Authority will conti.nue to manage its lands to exemplify sound reforestation, fish and wildlife, and soil conservation practices, and to provide assistance to public and private landowners in the planning and management of their lands to accomplish simi.lar resource management Objectives. 5.7.1 Policy It is the goal of the Authority's Conservation Land Management Program to: CONTRIBUTE TO THE QUALITY OF LAND AND WATER RESOURCES THROUGH A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM OF CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING FOREST MANAGEMENT, WILDLIFE HABITAT IMPROVEMENT, STREAM IMPROVEMENT, SOURCE AREA PROTECTION, AND CONSERVATION LAND PLANNING. The objective of the Program will be to: (a) implement a formal program, providing technical assistance and advice services to private landowners and public agencies in an effort to maintain sound conservation management practices and benefits on all lands within the region. This program will include a more active involvement, on the part of the Authority, in commenting on and participating in the management concerns of urban areas; (b) cooperate with municipalities and other public agencies in establishing regulatory controls to reduce erosion and sedimentation on rural and urban lands. Of particular concern are: the rural areas including the headwater regions of the Oak Ridges Interlobate Moraine, where erosion and sedimentation from construction sites, agricultural lands and water diversion structures are of serious consequence: and, urban areas where development is proposed for areas susceptible to erosion and sediment generation: (c) cooperate with municipal and public agencies to identify, protect and conserve areas of biOlogical and hydrologic significance and sensitivity, in both the valley systems and the headwater regions of the Moraine. As information is acquired, conservation and management of these areas will be dealt with on an individual basis: ( d) carry out a program of vegetation management in the rural and urban sections of the region's watersheds to control erosion and sedimentation, retain the moisture holding capacity of the soil, extend wildlife habitat, provide - 50 - timber products, and enchance the visual quality of the region; ( e) enhance the fisheries habitat on all streams through a program of stream improvement, with particular attention to expanding the cold water fisheries potential of private, public and Authority owned lands; and (f) lease lands to private and public agencies for agricultural and recreational purposes, ensuring that these lands are used in a manner compatible with the Authority's concerns for soil and water conservation. 5.7.2 Program Description The implementation of this Program is embodied in two components, Conservation Planning and Conservation Management. Within the Planning component Authority staff will provide technical assistance and advisory services to coordinate resource management on private, public and Authority lands both in rural and urban areas. Conservation plans will be developed for appropriate public and private lands recommending the most effective means of managing site resources. In rural areas properties must be larger than ten hectares. Criteria for the selection of urban properties for similar planning assistance will be developed in order to implement Authority objectives. Major Authority holdings, including those managed by other public agencies, will have management plans prepared based on site inventories of resources. The Conservation Management component will provide a practical means of achieving resource management objectives through implementation of the recommendations of the Planning function. Works may include a combination of reforestation, woodlot and plantation management, tree and shrub planting, plant propagation and stream improvements. The Authority will work on both public and private properties on the basis of requests for assistance and may require an owner contribution. Requests will be priorized on the basis of location within the watershed and property size. Funding for this Program will be based on a 50% or 55% provincial grant with the remaining amount raised by the Authority through a levy on its member municipalities. Where appropriate, an owner fee or contribution will be required. <; - 51 - '. , . 5.8 WATERSHED RECREATION PROGRAM The Authority will continue to acquire lands within its area of jurisdiction, as described elsewhere in this Plan. Where lands acquired are capable of supporting public use for recreation, the Authority will develop and manage its lands to provide these opportunities or will lease its lands to other agencies able to plan and implement compatible resource-based recreation. 5.8.1 Policy The goal of the Authority's Watershed Recreation Program is: TO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO AUTHORITY LANDS, WHERE THE PUBLIC CAN ENGAGE IN OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES REQUIRING A NATURAL SETTING AND ACQUIRE AN APPRECIATION OF THE REGION'S RESOURCES THROUGH RECREATION. The objectives of the Program will be to: (a) Designate tracts of land for outdoor recreation purposes ensuring that the recreation activities undertaken are compatible with other resource management goals and objectives of the Authority: (b) Encourage close cooperation of all agencies engaged in the provision of outdoor recreation opportunities to ensure that the residents of the Toronto region are well served with a diverse range of recreation opportunities provided in a cost-effective manner: (c) Manage all designated recreation lands and facilities to ensure the continuance of a recreation resource: (d) Undertake planning and management studies to augment, evaluate and update information relating to the provision of outdoor recreation on Authority lands: (e) Make available Authority lands, particularly those acquired in urban areas, to the Authority's member municipalities for open space purposes, ensuring that the land base is utilized in a manner consistent with the Authority's water management objectives: (f) Plan, manage and develop recreation facilities on conservation land in a manner which best suits the physiographic features of the area. - 52 - 5.8.2 Program Description Lands identified for compatible recreational use will be designated for management as: . Conservation Areas . Forest and Wildlife Areas, or . Lands suitable for lease by other agencies. The Authority will manage the first two categories. Conservation Areas will provide a broad range of outdoor recreation opportunities supported by the development of facilities and services. Forest and wildlife Areas will provide certain outdoor opportunities with limited site development but including provision for public access. Development in all areas will be on the basis of approved plans. Where Authority lands are leased to other agencies for recreation and open space purposes, the Authority will work closely with the leasing agency to ensure that development proposals are compatible with resource management objectives. Funding for Authority development of lands in the Watershed Recreation Program will be on the basis of a 50% Provincial grant with the remaining 50% raised by the Authority through a levy on its member municipalities. Provincial grants are not presently available for operation costs related to revenue-producing properties. In these instances, operating costs will be raised through user fees and municipal levy. c - 53 - 5.9 LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM The Authority will continue to implement the proposals of the 1967 Waterfront Plan, providing water-oriented regional open space. This work will be carried out on the basis of approved Master Plans, maximizing water-oriented activities, including boating, swimming, fishing, open space uses in conjunction with the waterfront, the preservation of significant natural and historical areas, and providing public access by land and water. Future work will expand the land base for these opportunities and provide primary development at specific sites. 5.9.1 POlicy It is the goal of the Authority's Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program to: CREATE A HANDSOME \'lATERFRONT, BALANCED IN ITS LAND USES, WHICH WILL COMPLEMENT ADJACENT AREAS, TAKING COGNIZANCE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND MAKING ACCESSIBLE, WHEREVER POSSIBLE, FEATURES WHICH WARRANT PUBLIC USE. In order to achieve this goal, the Authority has established the following objectives: (a) to acquire or create open space areas at regular intervals across the waterfront which can provide for a range of passive activities for the people of the region: (b) to seek opportunities to incorporate public recreational uses on public and quasi-public lands where such uses would not conflict with their present use. Should such lands cease to be used for their present public purposes, the Authority will, when appropriate, seek to retain them for waterfront purposes: ( c) to encourage the linking of waterfront open space corridors with those of the river valleys; ( d) to develop diverse sport fishing opportunities through habitat improvement and improved access in conjunction with the Ministry of Natural Resources' fisheries management program. (e) to create, at regular intervals along the Lake Ontario shoreline, small craft areas which will provide safe harbour age for the boating public, as well as day and seasonal mooring facilities: ( f) to encourage the preservation of the remaining lower valley marsh areas by discouraging further intrusion of intensive - 54 - recreational uses like power boating facilities in ilie lower valleys: (g) to cooperate with other agencies and particularly adjacent Conservation Authorities, who are undertaking waterfront planning and development: (h) to augment the present state of knowledge of lake processes by further research, data collection and analysis, including the assessment of the effect of developments undertaken in the area under the jurisdiction of the Authority: (i) to cooperate with all agencies concerned with improving the water quality of Lake Ontario in the area under the jurisdiction of the Authority. 5.9.2 Program Description The Authority's proposals for Lake Ontario Waterfront Development will retain, acquire or create a variety of pUblic open space opportunities across the waterfront: preserve, through careful management, the remaining undeveloped natural areas: recognize sites of historical significance in any development proposals: provide facilities for non-organized boating activities and a stable land base for organized boating activities: improve access to the shoreline and provide spawning areas to encourage fishing opportunities: and provide beaches for waterfront use as part of the headland and bay landfill construction technique. The lands developed under this Program in Metropolitan Toronto will be managed, under agreement, by the Metropolitan Parks and Property Department. Outside Metropolitan Toronto, lands may be managed by agreement, by the local municipality, where there is a local parks requirement, or by the Authority's Conservation Land Management Division. Funding for the Program will be based on a 50% grant from the Province of Ontario and 50% raised by the Authority on the following basis: 95% - levy from the waterfront municipalities of Metropolitan Toronto and the Region of "Durham 5% - levy from the non-waterfront municipalities of the Regions of Peel and York, and the Townships of Mono and Adjala. - 55 - 5.10 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The shoreli.ne of Lake Ontario, being composed of highly erodable sands, si 1 ts, clays, tills and gravels, is constantly subject to modification by the physical processes of wave action, fluctuations in lake levels, seepage, surface erosion, slumping, gulleying, and the action of wind and ice. Shoreline management involves the planning and implementation of measures intended to balance the actions of nature with the demands of man for use of the shorelines for open space or development. 5.10.1 Policy It is the goal of the Authority's Shoreline Management Program: TO UNDERTAKE A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM OF SHORELINE MANAGEMENT DESIGNED TO PREVENT, ELIMINATE, OR REDUCE THE RISK OF HAZARD TO LIFE AND PROPERTY, WHILE COGNIZANT OF THE NATURAL ATTRIBUTES OF THE LAKEFRONT SETTING. In order to achieve this goal it is the objective of the Authority to: ( a) seek the cooperation of municipalities in preventing the creation of new hazard prone development through the incorporation of appropriate statemen~s and designations concerning hazard areas in Official Plans and secondary plans (or their equivalent), and, to ultimately control development in such hazard areas through the enactment of restricted area bylaws (zoning) and/or development control bylaws: (b) cooperate with all agencies concerned with improving the water quality of Lake Ontario in the area under the jurisdiction of the Authority: ( c) carry out works along the shoreline of Lake Ontario in accordance with proper shoreline management principles. Works will primarily be of a type and design which will form a part of an integrated management system for the entire shoreline, will limit abnormal erosion at the land/water interface, will enable public access along the water's edge, and will be conducive to beach maintenance: ( d) cooperate, where possible, with municipalities, other government agencies and private owners in establishing criteria for their shoreline works which will be consistent with the Authority's shoreline management policy. - 56 - 5.10.2 Program Description The Authority's Shoreline Management Program incorporates both prevention and protection as measures to alleviate existing and potential shoreline hazard. The prevention component requires the recognition of shoreline hazards in establishing setbacks for development or redevelopment, the provision of assistance to private owners in the design of shoreline works, and regular monitoring of potentially hazardous areas. To minimize shoreline hazard the following review criteria will be utilized: i) Buildings, structures, or additions, (including paved surfaces), whether situated above or below ground level, should not be permitted in the following hazard impact zone, unless studies by a competent professional show that the buildings, structures, or additions will be safe during their life, which for Authority purposes is 100 years: and that the buildings, structures or additions will not aggravate existing, or create additional, problems: - 10 meters back from the 100 year wave uprush line as determined in the Great Lakes flood and erosion- prone area mapping where no definable bank exists: or - 10 meters back from the estimated 100 year erosion limit or if such information is not available, 10 meters back from the anticipated 2H:lV slope for unprotected eroding shorelines: or, - lO meters back from a stable bank (for Authority purposes assumed to be 2H:lV slope). ( ii) Surface drainage from any building, structure or paved surface should not be permitted to be discharged over shore cliffs but should be directed away from the face of the shore cliff or, where appropriate, piped to the base of the cliff. In certain sections of the Lake Ontario shoreline, particularly within the Borough of Scarborough, existing development is subject to potential damage due to shoreline erosion. Protective measures are, therefore, required to protect lives and minimize loss of property and municipal servicing through the construction of suitable shoreline works. Shoreline protection will be carried out on the basis of technical priorities, the availability of funding and the accessLbility of the site. Where protection is not feasible, acquisition by the Authority will be as outlined in the Land Acquisition Program. The following criteria will guide the Authority in establishing priorities for the implementation of protective works: (a) The major emphasis in the undertaking of protective works will be to control erosion due to wave action. The - 57 - required works will be designed in consideration of maximum expected lake levels as well as peak storm conditions; (b) Consideration will be given to bank stabilization techniques to be combined with toe protection in areas where additional protection is required to retain slopes at steeper than natural angles; ( c) Shore protection will be carried out on a design block basis. Design blocks are shoreline segments with physical characteristics which permit the segment to be protected as a unit. The characteristics to be considered include shoreline configuration, construction access, bank condition, talus formations and wave energy climate, among others; (d) Shoreline protection will be installed on a technical priority basis related to the safety of property and structures within the limitations of funding, approvals, construction access and property acquisition. priorities shall be based on technical criteria including, but not necessarily limited to, the following: - distance from top of bank to structure - rate of slope retreat - extent of groundwater seepage - height and steepness of slope - soil composition - vegetative cover, type and extent - evidence of previous movement - condition of toe of slope; ( e) Priorities for protection will be reviewed and approved by the Authority on an annual basis; (f) Existing waterfront public lands provide valuable recreational opportunities and, in many cases, serve as buffer zones between the shoreline and private lands. Therefore, the balance between funding allocated for protection of public and private lands is an important relationship which should be approved annually by the Authority; (g) In cases where private property is involved, the Authority shall require title to the land for a nominal sum or an easement where applicable, and in addition may require a suitable financial contribution from. the benefiting owner( s) ; (h) The Authority will assist in developing technology and distributing information which will aid property owners in - 58 - limiting the erosion of the bank after the toe prote'ction is installed: (i) The Authority's nursery will grow and sell plant material which is particularly well suited to bank stabilization and is not readily available from commerical suppliers. This part of the Program will be administered in accordance with the Conservation Land Management Program: ( j) For the development and interim management of all waterfront area development, shoreline protection should be considered a part of the capital development cost. Following the transfer of waterfront areas to a municipality for management, the management of shore protective works should be funded within the Shoreline Management Program. The funding of the Shoreline Management Program will be based on 55% from Provincial grants and 45% Authority funds, raised by a levy assigned to the benefiting municipality. - 59 - 5.11 HERITAGE CONSERVATION PROGRAM Heritage resources, where they occur on Authority lands, will continue to be conserved and managed as a community resource. The Authority has retained such resources, including structures and ar~haeo10gical sites, on its lands at Claremont (.farm dwelling), Bruce's Mill (mill and house), Black Creek (Black Creek Pioneer Village, both existing and relocated structures, and an archaeological site), Todmorden Mills, and Boyd (two archaeological sites) . The Authority is aware that there are several known and unknown archaeological sites on its various properties which will be conserved under the terms of The Ontario Heritage Act, 1974. The major heritage resource project will continue to be Black Creek Pioneer Village. 5.11.1 Policy It is the goal of the Authority's Heritage Conservation Program: TO PROTECT THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION RESOURCES WHICH OCCUR ON ITS LANDS ACQUIRED UNDER THE LAND ACQUISITION PROGRAM WHERE SUCH RESOURCES ARE SHOWN TO BE OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OR PROTECTED BY THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT, 1974 AND TO RESTORE AND INTERPRET TO THE PUBLIC SELECTED HERITAGE CONSERVATION RESOURCES WHERE SUCH RESOURCES CONTRIBUTE TO A FULLER UNDERSTANDING OF THE HISTORICAL USE OF NATURAL RESOURCES. In accomplishing this goal it is the objective of the Authority to: ( a) continue to develop, manage and operate the Black Creek Pioneer Village as representing a pre-Confederation. crossroads village demonstrating early central Ontario social, economic and political life and its relationship to resources: (b) continue to make the Black Creek Pioneer Village available as an educational resource to the school system: ( c) develop a pricing policy and marketing strategy for Black Creek Pioneer Village that reflects the addition of major restorations: (d) cooperate with The Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Foundation in developing suitable funding sources for a Visitors' Centre: (e) make the Black Creek valleylands south of Shoreham Drive available for municipal management subject to adequate provision being made for maintenance and supervision, and the right of access from Black Creek Pioneer Village to the Parsons Indian Village Site being retained: - 60 - (f) continue to provide security for heritage resources and arChaeological sites existing on Authority lands. 5.11.2 Program Description In order to continue an economically viable operation at Black Creek Pioneer Village and to increase attendance, priorities for future development have been established. Of first importance is the phased construction of a Visitors Centre which would house dining, group assembly, gift shop and washroom facilities. This will be accompanied by the relocation of the service area to the southeast and the adding of the valley lands south of Shoreham Drive to the lands managed and developed under the Authority's management agreement with The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto: the development and implementation of a marketi~g strategy: and the establishment of a pricing policy aimed at achieving a substantial proportion of operating costs being met through revenues. An annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Culture and Recreation, under its Museum Grant Program, is available with the balance of funding derived through the municipal levy. All capital development will be dependent upon the availability of funds, not only for construction, but also for any resultant staffing and building management requirements. - 61 - 5.12 COM~ruNITY RELATIONS PROGRAM The Authority will continue to provide to its watershed community a comprehensive community relations program for conservation information and conservation education designed to communicate the role of the Authority in resource management, and to contribute to the understanding of the principles and practices of resource management so as to foster an appreciation of the need for conservation programs. 5.12.1 POlicy It is the goal of the Community Relations Program to: COMMUNICATE TO ITS WATERSHED RESIDENTS THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE AUTHORITY, TO REPORT THE ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE AUTHORITY PROGRAM, TO ENGENDER A POSITIVE ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE AUTHORITY AND TO INSPIRE AN AWARENESS AND APPRECIATION OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE REGION AND THE NEED FOR THEIR MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION ON A WATERSHED BASIS. In carrying out its responsibilities for outdoor and conservation education it will be the objective of the Authority to: (a) include opportunities for learning as an integral part of its conservation programs and facilities: (b) protect natural areas which are sensitive to use, and which have unique characteristics important for learning opportunities, through proper management practice, including use by regulation: ( c) manage all lands, facilities and programs designated for outdoor and conservation education purposes in a manner consistent with the objects of the Authority, in order tha t participants can be assured of a continuing viable resource base: ( d) consider the lands, projects and facilities of the Authority as the principal resources of the educational program, and provide suitable facilities to accommodate education users, including residential and day use accommodation, interpretive displays and de~onstrations, visitor orientation facilities, trails and facilities for study and research: ~ ( e) cooperate with other resouYce management agencies and " educational institutions in the provision of outdoor learning opportunities, where such use is compatible with - 62 - the programs of the Authority, and enter into agreements to give effect thereto; ( f) cooperate with other resource management agencies and educational institutions in providing opportunities for study and research were such activity is compatible with the objects of the Authority; (g) carry out planning studies to determine the need to designate other tracts of land specifically for outdoor and conservation education purposes. In carrying out its responsibiities for conservation information it will be the objective of the Authority to: (a) provide opportunities for Authority members and staff to become familiar with Authority policies, programs, administration, and operations, and recognize individual achievement and contributions to the work of the Authority: (b) provide information to members in order that they may better communicate with area and regional municipalities, school boards and the Province of Ontario; ( c) develop specific programs to communicate to area and regional municipalities and school boards the need for work being carried out on their behalf by the Authority; (d) communicate to the residents of the Metropolitan Toronto region the vital need for resource management and the resource management programs being carried out by the Authority; (e) expand the communication of information concerning the Authority's water management responsibilities and the regulations and projects adopted to achieve these responsibilities; ( f) maintain a flood forecasting and flood warning system for the purpose of alerting municipal representatives, media, police and other government agencies, as required; (g) develop new mechanisms for communicating technical information to specific audiences, particularly municipal/provincial staff and elected representatives and those involved in the development industry; (h) provide, at a fee where appropriate, technical information for use by municipalities and consultants in the design of - 63 - facilities impacting on authority water management responsibilities~ (1) develop a comprehensive marketing strategy to communicate the facilities available in the Conservation Areas, Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Kortright Centre for Conservation~ (j) provide print material, exhibits, and audio-visuals to attract visitors to Authority facilities: (k) cooperate with other agencies at the local, provincial or federal level, to market the Authority attractions both within and beyond the Metro Toronto region~ (1) communicate, to pUblic and private landowners, the value of practising conservation land management, and inform them of the availability of Authority demonstrations, advice and assistance. 5.l2.2 Program Description - Conservation Education The principle resources of the conservation education program are the lands acquired by the Authority to implement its resource management objectives. In particular, the conservation field centres at Albion Hills, Boyd, Claremont, Cold Creek and Lake St. George, and the Kortright Centre for Conservation will be the foci of the program. The Authority will continue to operate its existing conservation education facilities and programs and will consider the addition of further facilities on the basis of requests from the participating Boards of Education. The development of these facilities would be based on school board requirements and funding, and on the compatibility of conservation education use with the Authority's other resource management Objectives. Funding for this Program is largely derived through user fees for faciE ty visitation. Provincial grants of 50 or 55% are provided for certain components of the program with the remainder derived from a levy on the Authority's member municipalities. 5.12.3 Program Description - Conservation Information The Authority will implement the conservation information program by evaluating and determining the most appropriate techniques to be utilized in transmitting specific information. This evaluation will reflect both the nature of the message to be communicated and the audience being addressed. In order to stimulate attendance at the Authority's revenue-prOducing operations, a marketing area survey will be conducted as the first stage toward the development of a comprehensive marketing strategy to be implemented as part of this program. - 64 - Funding for the program will be based on a 50-55% Provincial grant with the remainder being raised by the Authority through a levy on its member municipalities. - 65 - 5.13 DIRECTION 5.13.1 Interrelationship of Programs The core of the Watershed Plan is the FLOOD CONTROL PROGRAM. The Authority recognizes that, given the physical characteristics of the watersheds under its jurisdiction and the patterns of urban development, provision for safety from the hazards of flooding and erosion is a basic requirement. The Flood Control Program provides for site specific remedial measures in damage centres, acquisition of flood plain land and the application of regulatory and planning measures to retain the capability of flood plains to pass flood flows unobstructed. Accompanying the Flood Control Program are three programs which recognize the relationship between urban drainage, erosion and sedimentation, and flooding. These programs contribute to the achievement of flood control Objectives, and at the same time deal with erosion and sedimentation hazards. The EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PROGRAM is site specific and provides for corrective works where life and property is endangered. It also provides for regulatory and planning controls to prevent the development of additional hazard areas. The STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM establishes a basis for cooperatio~ between the Authority and its member municipalities in dealin~ with water management problems, at the source, through the preparation of master drainage plans. The Program will provide technical assistance by the Authority to municipalities. The CONSERVATION LAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM recognizes that conservation practices, applied to individual parcels of land, both adjacent to or remote from watercourses, whether public or private, contribute to the reduction of flooding and erosion problems while at the same time enhancing the landscape. It provides for reforestation, habitat improvements, stream improvements, and a conservation land planning service to owners. The Lake Ontario shoreline is treated in the same manner as a watershed in the SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM which provides for the reduction of erosion and flooding hazards along the shoreline of Lake Ontario through the application of protective works, acquisition, and planning and regulatory controls. The treatment of land in a watershed has a strong influence on the quantity and quality of water in its watercourses. To ensure proper conservation land management in many of the programs, the public acquisition of lands is a necessity. Public ownership of hazardous and sensitive land s , not only ensures that they are protected, but enables the application of necessary management practices. The LAND ACQUISITION PROGRAM establishes criteria for judging land suitable for acquisition and makes provision for the acquisition of flood plain and valley lands, waterfront lands, and environmentally significant lands. Lands acquired for conservation purposes, in many cases, are capable of serving the community as open space and recreation resources. The WATERSHED RECREATION PROGRAM and the LAKE ONTARIO WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM provide for the recreational development and management of Authority lands. Criteria for - 66 - judging suitable recreation uses are established and constraints, imposed by the physical characteristics of the land and water resources, are identified. The HERITAGE CONSERVATION 'PROGRAM recognizes the special contribution that an historical perspective gives to the understanding of resource management. All of the efforts of the Authority in its conservation programs are dependent upon community understanding and acceptance. The COMMUNITY RELATIONS PROGRAM establishes the means by which the Authority can communicate with the community, and places a special emphasis on legislators, municipal councillors, media, and the school system. Figure 4 illustrates, in plan form, the application of the programs on the watersheds under the Authority's jurisdiction. 5.13.2 Costs and Financial Implications The Watershed Plan identifies the direction which resource management will take in the Metropolitan Region over the next several years. It recognizes that there have been 25 years of effort preceding the Plan and, that during this time, substantial progress has been made. Land acquisition, in combination with major structural works, storage reservoirs and channels, and the application of regulations, has given relief to most of the major damage centres which were affected during Hurricane Hazel. The Plan concluded that the effort in the future should be directed to the prevention of new flood problems and to dealing with the remaining flood damage centres by means of cost effective, site specific remedial works. This approach necessitates a major shift in costs from capital intensive land acquisition and structures to development control, planning, regulatory, flood warning and land management costs. The overall impact of this shift is that the Authority's efforts, in terms of staff time allocation for flood control and related measures, will be increased and intensified, but spending will be decreased. The Plan identifies that the Programs which directly contribute to the alleviation of flooding: Flood Control, Storm Water Management, Land Acquisition and Conservation Land Management, provide for work to proceed at a pace which is managable within Authority capacity, and will require 21.4% of annual funding allocations. The role of the Authority in erosion and sediment control measures has increased over the years. A vigorous erosion control program, initiated in Metropolitan Toronto in the early 1970's has dealt with many serious and costly valley erosion problems. Most of the major sites have now been dealt with, and although the inventory of sites requiring works remains lengthy, the cost of remedial works, site by site, is more modest. The program has been expanded to include all member municipalities, and the opportunity to carry out 'stitch in time' works has been afforded. Only a very modest start in dealing with the substantial erosiqn problems along the Lake Ontario shoreline has been made. The funding allocation recommended in the Watershed Plan for erosion and sediment control works recognizes these factors and provides for more emphasis - 67 - on the Lake Ontario shoreline. The Plan allocates 11.8% of the annual funding to Erosion and Sediment Control and Lake Ontario Shoreline Management. Considerable study was given to the management of Authority lands for recreation purposes. The total land holdings of the Authority at mid year 1980 were 10,646 hectares. The management cost of this land is a major concern. The Plan reconunends that the practice of encouraging municipalities to manage conservation lands in urban areas be continued, that the recreational use managed by the Authority be confined to eight conservation areas, and that the remaining lands be managed as forest and wildlife areas and resource management units. The cost of managing the Watershed Recreation Program represents 5.3% of total funding for program administration and development, 4.8% of total funding for municipal levy to support operations and maintenance, and 6.4% of total funding which represents conservation area revenues which contributes to operations and maintenance. The relatively low allocation of provincial and municipal funds for ~le Watershed Recreation Program reflects the advanced stages of development of most conservation areas and the substantial portion of maintenance and operating costs which are met through program revenues. Lake Ontario Waterfront Development is presently classified as a special project by the Province of Ontario and does not impact on provincial cash flow available for Water and Related Land Use, Conservation and Recreation, and Administration. It does, however, impact on available municipal funds. The nature of the waterfront work is such that once a component is started, substantial funding is required to complete it. The funding allocation in the Plan for Lake Ontario Waterfront Development is 25% less than the provision in the original Waterfront Project, but still will provine for reasonable progress. It represents 20% of the total funding allocation. The Heritage Conservation Program represents 7.6% of the total funding allocation. The municipal levy portion represents .4% of the total funding allocation, the remainder being revenues applicable to the operation of Black Creek Pioneer Village. There is no provision in the Plan for major new development. The construction of a Visitors Centre is an Objective but funding would be over and above annual allocations and derived from a variety of sources. The Conununity Relations Program contributes to all the other programs, through information services and specific learning opportunities and represents 12.6% of the total funding allocation. Included in this allocation is 6.6% derived from program revenues. The allocation for this Program was determined on the basis of maintaining existing level of service and modestly increasing the Authority's ability to continue the development of educational facilities. All funding allocations for the Programs include an allowance for direct program administration costs, including supervision and employee benefits. Overall Authority administration costs include all administrative office management and support costs and represent 10% of the total funding allocation. - 68 - In summary, the Plan recommends an annual funding allocation expressed in 1980 dollars as follows: $MILLION PROV/MUNC FUNDING % OF FUNDING EXPENDITURES REVENUES REQUIRED REQUIRED . Programs directly related to Flood Control 3.2 3.2 26.5 . Erosion & Sediment and Shoreline Management 1.8 1.8 14.9 . Watershed Recreation 2.7 1.0 1.7 14.0 . Lake Ontario Waterfront 3.0 3.0 24.8 . Heritage Conservation 1.0 .9 .1 .8 . Community Relations 1.9 1.0 .9 7.4 . Administration 1.4 - 1.4 11.6 TOTAL 15.0 2.9 12.1 100.0 The impact of new capital development on the annual operations and maintenance costs of the Authority is set out in the programs. As new land is acquired or as new remedial measures are constructed, the addition of management costs will be reflected in the budget of subsequent years. 5.13.3 Priorities The Watershed Plan has been prepared as a comprehensive guide for the Authority in carrying out its conservation mandate and in compliance with the direction from the Province of Ontario that an authority file, with the Province and its member municipalities, a Watershed Plan. The Plan consists of ten conservation programs which are seen as being complementary to one another in achieving the Authority's overall goal. Within each of the Programs there are priorities for the various activities which make up the Program. The setting of priorities is necessary in order that limited time and financial resources can be allocated to have the greatest impact on achieving the goal. All of the Programs contribute to the goal and are considered of equal priority. The annual funding which is allocated to each Program is not an indicator of its priority but a measure of what is required to achieve the goal of that Program. Based on the Programs outlined in this Plan, the Authority will, as in the past, adopt projects for the carrying out of its work. It is the policy of the Authority, in this regard to: (a) adopt a project: (b) request the approval of the municipality(ies): (c) request the approval of the province: - 69 - (d) request the approval of the Ontario Municipal Board if it is to be a multi-year project or if a municipality is going to capitalize its share: (e) upon.receipt of all approvals, levy the municipalities for their share. This can be done either as a part of the annual budget or as a special levy, if agreed to by the municipalities. - 70 - 6. GLOSSARY OF TERMS The following definitions are provided to facilitate understanding of the Watershed Plan and its component Programs. Many of the definitions are derived from the "Resource Conservation Glossary" publ ished by the Soil Conservation Society of America. accretion: the gradual addition of new berm: a shel f or flat area that land to old by the deposition of breaks the continuity of a slope: sediment carried by a stream dyke alluvial: pertaining to material that biophysical: the combination of is transported and deposited by running biological and physical water characteristics antecedent soil moisture: degree of biota: the flora and fauna of a wetness of soil prior to the beginning region of a runoff period, expressed as an index or as total inches of soil water boat launch: man-made device for (moisture) launching watercraft ego ramp structure where a boat trailer may aquifer: a geologic formation of be backed into the water to a depth structure that transmits water sufficient to float the boat arboretum: a collection of plants, buffer: strips of erosion-resisting trees and shrubs grown for public vegetation: land used to separate exhibition: for public enjoyment, conflicting uses recreation, education or research catchbasin: area draining into a armouring: material used or method of reservoir: river basin: device to stabilizing areas to protect from catch drainage erosion channel: a natural stream that backwater: water moved or held back conveys water: a ditch or channel excavated for the flow of water backwater calculation: the calculation of flood levels taking into account the channel improvement: the volume of water (flows) and the channel improvement of the flow geometry: including man-made structures characteristics of a channel by or restrictions, ie. bridges, culverts clearing, excavation, realignment, lining, or other means, in order to base flow: stream discharge from increase its capacity groundwater runoff confluence: point where streams basin: in hydrology, the area drained come together by a river conservation: the protection, benthos: the plant and animal life improvement and use of natural whose habitat is the bottom of a sea, resources according to principles lake or river that will assure their highest economic or social benefits - 71 - conservation ethic: a philosophy of drumlin: smoothly rounded, oval hill conduct and principles practiced to formed under moving glacial ice achieve the optimum combination of resource utilization and resource easement: a limited right over land protection to meet the objectives of the owned by someone else community. ecology: the study of conservation lands: lands which are interrelationships of organisms to considered to be regionally one another and to their environment significant, such as valleys, or environmentally sensitive and are best environment: the sum tota 1 of all managed by a public agency to retain the external conditions that may act their natural characteristics upon an organism or community to influence its development or continental climate: the type of existence climate characteristic of areas separated from the moderating influence erosion: 1. the wearing away of the of oceans by distance, direction or land surface by running water, wind, mountain barriers: marked by relatively ice or other geological agents. large daily and seasonal change in 2. detachment and movement of soil temperature or rock fragments by water, wind, ice or gravity. The following terms are cross-section: a vertical section of used to describe different types of the river valley perpendicular to the water erosion: stream or river which illustrates the shape of the valley and river channel. accelerated erosion: erosion Used to determine the opening available much more rapid than normal, natural for the passage of flood flows or geologic erosion, primarily as a result of the influence of the cut-and-fill: process of earth moving activities of man or, in some cases, by excavating part of an area and using of other animals or natural the excavated material for adjacent catastrophies that expose base embankments or fill areas surfaces, for example, fires damage centre: an existing developed gully erosion: the erosion area that is susceptible to loss of process whereby water accumulates in life and/or property damage as a result narrow channels and, over short of flooding up to the Regional Flood periods, removes the soil from this event. However, due to excessive narrow area to considerable depths, acquisition costs or the possible ranging from 1 to 2 feet to as much disruptive nature of acquiring existing as 75 to lOO feet viable developed areas (damage centres) , continued development or natural erosion: wearing away of redevelopment (infilling) may be the earth's surface by water, ice, or possible subject to conditions other natural agents under natural established by the Authority environmental conditions of climate, vegetation, etc. , undisturbed by man. dike: in engineering, an embankment to Also called geological erosion confine or control water, especially one built along the banks of a river to rill erosion: an erosion process prevent overflow of lowlands in which numerous small channels only several inches deep are formed: dredgeate: dredged material occurs mainly on recently disturbed soils - 72 - sheet erosion: the removal of a does not necessarily produce a l5 fairly uniform layer of soil from the year flood event. The following are land surface by runoff water examples of flood events: escarpment: a steep face or a ridge of 100 Yr. Flood (valleys): the high land flood that based on historical data occurs on the average once in lOO esker': a narrow ridge of gravelly or years. It is based on peak flows as sandy drift deposited by a stream in opposed to rainfall amounts association with glacial ice l:lOO Yr. Flood (water front) : fair market value: that value that the flood that based on historical would induce a willing seller to sell data occurs on the average once in and a willing buyer to buy lOO years. For the waterfront, the 1: lOO year flood is utilized as the fi 11: any material deposited by any Regional Flood agent so as to fill or partly fill a channel, valley, or other depression Regional Flood: the flood elevation that is produced by the fill regulation: the regulation of the runoff that results from rainfall as placing of fill by the Authority defined by the Regional Storm. The through the requirement of a proponent Regional Flood for the waterfront is to obtain permission as set out under the flood elevation produced by the Section 27(l) of The Conservation Regional Storm for the waterfront Authorities Act flood peak: the highest value of the fill regulation line: used to stage or discharge attained by a establish the area wherein the flood Authority will regulate the placing of fill floodplain: nearly level land situated on either side of a channel flood: an overflow or inundation that which is subject to overflow comes from a river or body of water and flooding causes or threatens damage floodway: an area used to carry flood damage reduction measures: any excessive flood flows. The combination of structural and transitional area between the active nonstructural additions, change or channel and the floodplain adjustments to existing fl ood vulnerable structures which reduce or flow depth: the depth of the water eliminate flood damage to real estate at any particular location within the or improved real property, water and floodplain or channel sanitary facilities, structures and their contents flow velocity: the speed of flowing water. This will vary depending on flood event: an occurence based upon where within the floodplain or the measurement or calculation of the channel the velocity is measured. volume of runoff or peak flow that Generally, flow velocities are results from any given rainfall or greatest within the central portion snowmelt. It should be noted, for of the channel and decrease to the example, that a l5 year storm event edge of the floodplain - 73 - free board: is the distance between habitat: the environment in which the top of any berm, dike, dam or edge the life needs of a plant or animal of a no development zone and the design organism, population, or community level, ie. the maximum water surface are supplied elevation anticipated in design hazard lands: those lands which due frequency (return period): a to their susceptibility to flooding statistical indication of the rate at or unstable slopes or soils are which a specific event occurs over a considered to be hazardous if given period of time. For example a 1 developed in 10 year flood would occur on the average once every lO years. However, headwater: 1. the source of a it should be noted that it is possible stream. 2. the water upstream from to experience more than one 100 year a structure or point on a stream flood within a lOa year period hydraulics: the science that enables gabion: a rectangular or cylindrical the calculation of flow depths and wire mesh cage filled with rock and velocities and how they are affected used in protecting against erosion by channel and valley geometry as well as various obstructions such as geomorphology: the study of the form bridges, culverts, etc. of the earth, the general configuration of its surface, and the changes that hydrologic cycle: the circuit of take place in the evolution of water movement from the atmosphere to landforms the earth and return to the atmosphere through var ious stages or grade: 1. the slope of a road, processes, as precipitation, channel or natural ground. 2. the interceptic.n, runoff, infiltration, finished surface of a canal bed, percolation, storage, evaporation, roadbed, top of embankment, or bottom and transpiration of excavation: any surface prepared for the support of construction. 3. to hydrology: the science dealing with finish the surface of a canal bed, the waters of the earth or what roadbed, top of embankment, or bottom happens to the rain once it fa II s on of excavation the ground. Calculations of the volume ( flows) of water for various gradient: change of elevation, storm events at various locations on velocity, pressure or other the watershed can be made characteristics per unit length: slope hydrostatic pressure: the force per grassed waterway: a natural or unit area exerted by a liquid at constructed waterway, usually broad and rest shallow, covered with erosion-resistant grasses, used to conduct surface water impervious/impermeable soil: a soil through which water, air or roots groundwater: subsurface water in the cannot penetrate zone of saturation infilling: development or groyne: beach protection structure redevelopment within a damage centre perpendicular to shoreline - 74 - infiltration: gradual downward flow of outfall: point where water flows water from the surface through soil to from a conduit, stream or drain groundwater and water table reservoirs permeable/pervious: capable of intermittent stream: a stream or transmitting air or liquid portion of a stream that flows only in direct response to precipitation and is physiography: study of the earth's dry for a large part of the year surface and oceans, atmosphere, etc. kame: a conical hill or short point source (pollution) : a irregular ridge of sand or gravel stationary source which can be deposited in contact with glacial ice identified landform: a discernible natural prObability: another way of landscape, such as a floodplain, stream defining the frequency of an event. terrace, plateau, or valley The probability of a 1 in 10 yr. flood is l/lO or 0.1. A 1:10 yr. marsh: a periodically wet or flood event has a statistical continually flooded area where the probability of O.l of being equalled surface is not deeply submerged: or exceeded once in lO years. It can covered dominately with sedges, also be said that there is a lO% cattails, rushes, or other hydrophytic chance of the 10 yr. flood occurring plants in anyone year meander: the turn of a stream rainfall intensity: the rate at which rain is falling at any given microclimate: the climatic condition instant of a small area resulting from the modification of the general climatic recharge: process by which water is conditions added to the zone of saturation, as recharge of an aquifer moraine: an accumulation of glacial drift, generally of rock, gravels and reforestation: restocking an area sands, built within a glaciated region with forest trees chiefly by the direct action of glacial ice regional storm: the storm used for regulation purposes as defined by the nonpoint pollution: pollution whose Authority. sources cannot be pinpointed The Metropolitan Toronto and Region open space: a relatively undeveloped Conservation Authority has defined green or wooded area, generally the Regional Storm for the valleys as referred to in an urban development that storm which is based on the rainfall that fell during Hurricane outdoor recreation: the use of soi 1, Hazel. water, and natural resources, their aesthetic values and productivity, in The Regional Storm utilized for the accordance with the suitability of waterfront is that combination of these resources for providing outdoor high water, wind set up and wave leisure-time activities uprush that produces the Regional Flood. The Regional Storm for the - 75 - waterfront is based on a l:lOO year slope: the degree of deviation of a event. surface from horizontal, measured in a numerical ratio, percent or renewable natural resources: resources degrees that can be restored and improved spill zone: an area where the valley reservoir: impounded body of water or is ill defined resulting in a broad, controlled lake in which water is uncontained exit for flood waters. collected or stored As a result, it is difficult to accurately determine the limit or revetment: facing of stone or other depth of flooding material, either permanent or temporary, placed along the edge of a stage: the variable water surface or stream or shore to stabilize the bank the water surface elevation above any and to protect it from erosion chosen datum riprap: broken rocks, cobbles or stereoscope: a binocular optical boulders placed on earth surfaces for instrument for viewing two properly protection against the action of water oriented photographs to obta in a (waves) mental impression of a three dimensional effect risk: the chance that is associated with any action where harm or loss can storm event: a rainfall event where be encountered. The risk associated the amount of rain that falls is with building in the floodplain can be measured as opposed to the volume of assigned a percentage value based upon runoff. Two storms referred to are: the degree of flood susceptibility of the proposed development. For example, l:lOO yr. storm (valleys): the there is a 39% risk that a development storm that produces an amount of wi thin the lOa year floodline would be rainfall that based on historical damaged over a 50 year period data occurs on the average once in 100 years runoff: that portion of the precipitation on a drainage area that l:lOO yr. storm (waterfront): is discharged from the area in stream the storm that produces a combination channels of high lake levels, wind set up and wave uprush that based on historical sediment: solid material, both mineral data occurs on the average once in and organic, that is in suspension, is lOO years being transported, or has been moved from its site of origin by air, water, stream, cold water: a stream that gravity or ice and has come to rest on supports a cold water fishery, the earth's surface either above or usually including trout. Optimum below sea level temperatures are lO degrees C to 15 degrees C seiche: short term changes in the water level of a lake due to changes in substrate: L the base of substance barometric pressure or other factors upon which an organsim is growing. 2. the bottom material of a waterway - 76 - succession: the progressive watershed planning: formulation of development of vegetation toward its a plan to use and treat water and highest ecological expression, the land resources climax: replacement of one plant community by another weir: device for measuring or regulating the flow of water swamp: , an area saturated with water throughout much of the year but with the surface of soil not deeply submerged: usually characterized by tree or shrub vegetation till: unstratified glacial drift deposited directly by the ice and consisting of clay, sand, gravel, and boulders intermingled in any proportion topography: the relative positions and elevations of the natural or manmade features of an area that describe the configuration of its surface two zone concept: used to describe a type of floodplain management which allows a certain encroachment into the floodplain by filling to a point where the increase in flood levels upstream does not exceed a specified amount urban runoff: storm water from city streets and gutters that usually contains a great deal of litter and organic and bacterial wastes water resources: the supply of groundwater and surface water in a given area watershed area: all land and water within the confines of a drainage divide watershed management: use, regulation, and treatment of water and land resources in a watershed to accomplish stated objectives APPENDIX Selected Program Graphics The following graphics have been selected from the ten programs of the Watershed Plan and are included in this document for information. For complete details the program documents should be referred to. ~ h ,. d. WATERSHED PLAN FIG. 4 (y t e metropo Itan toronto an region conservation authority