The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFlood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board 1980 ~ C-l , the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONS. ADV. BD. FRIDAY-FEBRUARY-15-1980 11/80 The Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board met at the Authority Office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday, February 15, 1980, commencing at 9:30 a.m. PRESENT WERE Chairman J.S. Scott Vice Chairman W.R. Herridge, Q.C. Members C.F. Kline L. Martin F.J. McKechnie M.M.R. Stewart Mrs. H.D. Sut.ter Chairman of the Authority R. Grant Henderson Vice Chairman of the Authority Mrs. F. Gell Authority Member Mrs. N. Stoner Secretary-Treasurer K.G. Higgs Director of Planning & POlicy W.A. McLe an Adm. - Water Resource Division M.R. Garrett Project Planner, Water Resource Division T.E. Farrell Project Engineer - Hydrology, WRD D. Haley Development Coordinator, Planning & Policy J.W. Maletich Head, Flood Control Section, WRD J.C. Mather - ABSENT tvERE Members Mrs. C. Bell D.G. Fleet R. Skjarum W.M. Swann A. Tonks H.G. Westney MINUTES The Minutes of Meeting #5/79 were presented. Res. #! Moved by: C.F. Kline SecQnded by: Mrs. N. Stoner RESOLVED THAT: The Minutes of Meeting #5/79, as presented~ be adopted. CARRIED; WATERSHED PLAN - Storm Water Management Program The staff presented a draft of the Storm Water Management Program, which forms a part of the Watershed Plan, and reflects staff suggestions regarding program direction. Res. #2 Moved by: Mrs. H.D. Sutter Seconded by: Mrs. N. Stoner RESOLVED THAT: The Draft Storm Water Management Program be received and approved for inclusion in the Watershed Plan. CARRIED; Res. #3 Moved by: C.F. Kline Seconded by: M.M.R. Stewart RESOLVED THAT: The staff be directed to provide staff planner~ and engineers C-2 - 2 - in the local and regional municipalities and staff of the provincial Ministries of the Environment, Natural Resources and Housing copies of the Storm Water Management Program, as approved by the Flood Control and Water Conservation Advisory Board; and ~. FURTHER THAT a copy of the Program be provided to the Credit Valley Conservation Authori ty. CARRIED; WATERSHED PLAN -Flood Control Program The staff presented a draft of the Flood Control Program, which forms a part of the Watershed Plan, and reflects staff suggestions regarding guiding principles for protection of existing damage centres, the Flood Warning System, and direction for control of new development to prevent flood-vulnerability. Res. #4 Moved by: W.R. Herridge, Q.C. Seconded by: C.F. Kline RESOLVED THAT: The final draft of the Flood Control Program be received and approved as amended for inclusion in the Watershed Plan. CARRIED; ADJOURNMENT On Motion, the Meeting adjourned at 1:00 p.m., February 15. J.S. Scott K.G. Higgs Chairman Secretary-Treasurer ~ , C-3 the metropolitan toronto and region conservation authority minutes FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONS. ADV. BD. FRIDAY-SEPTEMBER-5-l9BO #2/BO The Flood Control and \vater Conservation Advisory Board met at the Authority Office, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, on Friday, September 5, 19BO, commencing at 9:30 a.m. PRESENT WERE Chairman J.S. Scott Vice-Cha irman W.R. Herridge, Q.C. Members C.F. Kline L. Martin Mrs. N.J. Stoner Mrs. H.D. Sutter A. Tonks H.G. Westney Chairman of the Authority R.G. Henderson Vice-Chairman of the Authority Mrs. F. Gell Secretary-Treasurer K.G. Higgs Director of Planning & Policy W.A. McLean Adm. - Water Resource Division M.R. Garrett Project Planner, Water Resource Division T.E. Farrell Proj. Eng.-Hydrology, Flood Control Section, WRD D.R. Haley Dev. Co-ord. , Development Control, P&P J.W. Maletich Head, Flood Control Section, WRD J.C. Mather ABSENT WERE Members D.G. Fleet V.K. McCreary F.J. McKechnie R. Skjarum W.M. Swann MINUTES The Minutes of Meeting #l/BO were presented. Res. #5 Moved by: H.G. Westney Seconded by: C.F. Kline RESOLVED THAT: The Minutes of Meeting #l/BO, as presented, be adopted. CARRIED; PROGRESS REPORT A slide tape presentation on the Flood Damage Reduction Programme, administered by the Inland Waters Directorate of Environment Canada, was shown. Copies of a brochure describing the programme were distributed to Members for their information. The staff presented the Progress Report: Watershed Plan Presentation of the Watershed Plan has been made to Councils of the municipalities in the area under the jurisdiction of the Authority; meetings have been held between Authority staff and staff of a number of municipalities to discuss the various programmes in the Plan. C-4 -2- ~eating Channel The Board was advised that all funding approvals have been received. The necessary approvals have not, however, been received under The Environmental Assessment Act and The Environmental Protection Act to permit the Authority to proceed with the Keating Channel Improvements. Milne Dam Control Building The reconstruction of the Control Building will be re-tendered. Oak Ridges Channel, Town of Richmond Hill Delayed due to inability to negotiate acquisition of one property. Studies Completed .Storm Water Management Study .Flood Damage Centre Study .Environmentally Sensitive Areas Study - Second Year Erosion Control Works Slides were shown of the erosion control works completed in 1980 and representative sites of areas to be undertaken in 1981. Flood Occurrence - March 2l, 1980 The staff presented a report and showed slides regarding the flood conditions of March 21, 1980. Res. #6 Moved by: C.F. Kline Seconded by: H.G. Westney RESuLVED TH1~T: The Staff Progress Report be received. CARRIED: INTERIM WATER & RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT PROJECT 1979-198l -Erosion Control & Slope Stabilization in Metropolitan Toronto: 1981 Programme Delegation: Messrs. T. Burke and J. Andreana The delegation made a submission to the Board regarding a serious problem on the Etobicoke Creek at Delroy Drive, and distributed pictures of the site. They requested that the Board give consideration to changing the priorities for completion of erosion control works at this site. The staff submitted a report outlining accomplishments to date, current priorities, and the 1981 work programme. Res. #7 Moved by: Mrs. H.D. Sutter Seconded by: A. Tonks RESOLVED THAT: The Progress Report and the Current Erosion Priorities be received and appended as Schedule "A" of these Minutes: and THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT The 1981 Work Programme and the Current Priorities for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in Metropolitan Toronto, as appended as part of Schedule "A" of these Minutes, be approved. CARRIED: Res. #8 Moved by: L. Martin Seconded by: Mrs. N. Stoner RESOLVED THAT: The staff be directed to review the erosion problem and the priorities for major remedial work at #24-26 Delroy Drive, Dorough of Etobicoke (Nimico Creek), and to discuss the matter with officials of the Borough. CARRIED: -3- C-5 INTERUI \vATER & RELA'rED LAND MANAGEMENT PROJECT ] 979-1981 -Erosion Control & Slope Stabilization in the Regions of Peel, York and Durham: 1981 Programme The staff suhmitted a report outlining accomplishments to date, current priorities, and the 1981 work programne. Res. #9 Moved by: C.F. Kline Seconded by: H.G. Westney RESOLVED THAT: The Progress Report and the Current Erosion priorities be received and appended as Schedule "B" of these Minutes; and THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT the 19R1 Work Programme and the Current priorities for Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization in the Regions of Peel, York, and Durham as appended as part of Schedule IIBII of these Minutes, be approved. CARRIED; 1981 PRELIMINARY BUDGET ESTIMATES The 1981 Preliminary Budget Estimates were presented. Res. no Moved by: W.R. Herridge, Q.C. Seconded by: Mrs. N. Stoner RESOLVED THAT: The 1981 Preliminary Budget Estimates for the Water Resource Division, Flood Control Section, be approved in principle; and THE BOARD RECOMMENDS T~~T The 1981 Preliminary Budget Estimates for the Water Resource Division, Flood Control Section, as appended as Schedule "CII of these Minutes, be included in the 1981 Preliminary Budget Estimates of the Authority. CARRIED: BRAMPTON DIVERSION CHANNEL -Fencing The staff presented a resolution received from the Council of The Corporation of the City of Brampton regarding fence replacement along the Brampton Diversion Channel. Res. UI Moved by: C.F. Kline Seconded by: Mrs. H.D. Sutter RESOLVED THAT: The staff communication, together with the resolution, dated February 12, 1980, of the Council of The Corporation of the City of Brampton, be received: and THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT The Authority advise the City of Brampton that it will carry out replacement of the boundary fence along the Brampton Diversion Channel, subject to funding being available in 1981 and to the approval of the Ministry of Natural Resources. CARRIED: NEW BUSINESS The staff advised the Board that it is planned to hold an Official Opening of the Stouffville Channel Improvements on Friday, October 17, 1980, at approximately 1:30 p.m., following lunch. It was requested that all members of the Board attend the Opening, if possible. The Board was advised that an Authority Tour is scheduled for Friday, September 19, 1980. One of the stops is to review the Storm Water Management System which has been implemented as part of the development of Canada's Wonderland. Mrs. Stoner requested that the Board investigate the landfill operations and the sludge disposal area on the Brougham and Spring Creeks, tributaries of the Duffin Creek. ADJOURNMENT On Motion, the meeting adjourned at 12:35 p.m. J.S. Scott K.G. Higgs Chairman Secretary-Treasurer KC. C-6 SCHEDULE "A" EROSION CONTROL AND BANK STABILIZATION IN METROPOLITAN TORONTO 1981 PROGRAMME AS PROPOSED IN THE INTERIM WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT PROJECT 1979-1981 THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AUGUST, 1980 C-7 2 EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN METROPOLITAN TORONTO 1981 PROGRAMME INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to outline the progress of the Erosion Control and Slope Stabilization Project for Metropolitan Toronto which is designed to carry out the fol10wing: (a) Major erosion control and slope stabilization remedial works carried out on a priority basis on the primary watercourses; (b) Initiate a preventative programme in the form of minor remedial works and re-vegetation of embankments. Since site conditions change continually, the priorities have to be reviewed on a regular basis. The current top priorities are reflected in the work programme for 1981 and the "Pool of Priority Sites", which are found in the respective sections of this report. C-8 PROGRESS REPORT 3 The following is a list of sites at which major or minor remedial work was carried out between September, 1974 (inception of project) and August, 1980. LOCATION WATERSHED WORK-YEAR MAJOR REMEDIAL WORKS 90 Forestgrove Drive East Don River 1974 20-30 Islay Court Humber River 1974 39-41 Storer Drive Humber River 1974-1975 99-103 Burban~ Drive Newtonbrook Creek 1974-1975 Hi Mount Drive Newtonbrook Creek 1974-1975 8-10 King Maple Place Newtonbrook Creek 1974-1975 113 Burbank Drive Newtonbrook Creek 1975 14-22 Archway Crescent Humber River 1975 6 Wooden Heights Humber River 1975 45 Riverbank Drive and Vicinity Mimico Creek 1975 32-38 Bonnyview Drive Mimico Creek 1975 37-43 Lakeland Drive West Humber 1975-1976 Yvonne Public School Black Creek 1976 30-56 Grovetree Road West Humber 1976 95-97 Portico Drive East Branch Highland Creek 1976 197-205 Sweeney Drive East Don River 1976 24 Stonegate Road Humber River 1976-1977 24-36 Westleigh Crescent Etobicoke Creek 1976-1977 158-168 & 190-212 Three Valleys Dr. East Don River 1976-1977 6-14 Sulkara Court East Don River 1978 Don Valley Drive Don River 1978 50-58 Stanwood Crescent Humber River 1978-1979 Enfield/Sunset/Jellicoe vicinity Etobicoke Creek 1979 17-53 Riverview Heights Humber River 1979 10 Code co Court - Phase I Don River 1980 35 Canyon Avenue Don River 1979 31-39 Rivercove Drive Mimico Creek 1980 25-31 Alamosa Drive Don River 1980 Don Val1ey Parkway and Lawrence Don River In Progress 10-14 Bruce Farm Drive Don River Proposed 1980 39-47 Presley Avenue Don River Proposed 1980 "MINOR REMEDIAL WORK 520 Markham Rd. vicinity Highland Creek 1975 (Cedarbrook Retirement Home) 84-89 Greenbrook Drive Black Creek 1975 Kirkbradden Road Mimico Creek 1975 West Hill Collegiate Highland Creek 1975 Shore ham Court Black Creek 1975 27-31 Ladysbridge Drive West Branch Highland 1975-1976 N.W. of 56 Grovetree Road West Humber River 1975-1976 37-43 Mayall Avenue Black Creek 1976 79 Clearview Heights Black Creek 1976 S.W. of Shoreham Dr. Bridge Black Creek 1976 Driftwood Court Black Creek 1976 75 Decarie Circle Mimico Creek 1976 4 Woodhaven Heights Humber River 1977 73 Van Dusen Boulevard Mimico Creek 1977 Donalda Club (8th Fwy) Don River 1978 Westleigh"Crescent vicinity Etobicoke Creek 1978 Scarlett Woods Golf Club Humber River 1978 22-26 Dunning Crescent Etobicoke Creek 1978 Kennedy Road Shopping Mall Don River 1978 Sheppard & Leslie Nursery Don River 1978 Leslie St. at Sheppard Don River 1978 Meadowvale Road Rouge River 1978 Zoo (Z-15) - Phase I Rouge Ri ve r 1978 Orchard Crescent Mimico Creek 1978 Forest Valley Day Camp Don River 1978 Beechgrove Drive Highland Creek 1979 Restwel1 Crescent Don River 1979 C-9 4 LOCATION WATERSHED WORK-YEAR MINOR REMEDIAL WORK (Cont'd) Deanewood Crescent Vicinity Mimico Creek 1979 Dawes Road - 2 sites Don Ri ver 1979 Tywn Rivers Bridge Rouge River 1979 Glen Rouge Trailer Camp Rouge River 1979 Beechgrove Drive - II Highland Creek 1980 Jason and Riverdale Humber River 1980 Warden & St.Clair - 2 Sites Don River 1980 Zoo-II Rouge River 1980 Glendon College Don River 1980 Scarlett Roa~ and Eglinton Humber River 1980 CURRENT PRIORITIES Due to the large number of sites requiring erosion control and bank stabilization work throughout Metropolitan Toronto, major remedial work is being undertaken on a priority basis. The original priority ratings listed in the James F. MacLaren report of March 1970, are used as a starting point in assessing the rate of progress and deterioration during the ten years that have elapsed. Based on year-round monitoring, the severity of the problem in its present state and a fair idea of its relative potential to deteriorate, the staff has determined a pool of sites bearing high priority ratings. Because erosion is a dynamic problem, the priorities within this pool change continually as we strive to ameliorate the list with the steady influx of technical data on site conditions. Therefore, the following list of "current priorities" will be reviewed regularly during 1981 in order to accommodate any significant changes and the possible inclusion of new sites. PtiOPOSED MAJOR RENIEQ!8.L WORK SITES FOR ~ (') I METRO, .... 0 LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL ESTIMATED COMMENTS PRIORITY COST 1-35 Lakeland Drive West Humber River Etobicoke 1 75,000.00 Problem: Slope failure Structures Affected: Three Residences Height of Bank - 12m Length of Bank - 40m -14 Azalea Court Humber River North York 2 150,000.00 Problem: Slope failure - Emery Creek Structures Affected: Four Residences Height of Bank: 18m Length of Bank: 40m 4-68 Grenview Boulevard Mimico Creek Etobicoke 3 60,000.00 Problem: Riverbank Erosion & Slope Failure Structures Affected: Two Residences Height of Bank - 13m Length of Bank.- 25m 9-107 Weir Crescent Highland Creek Scarborough 4 150,000.00 Problem: Slope failure Structures Affected: Seven Residences . Height of Bank: 30m Length of Bank: 150m ~11 Sulkara Court East Don River North York 5 100,000.00 Problem: Slope failure Structures Affected: Two Residences . Height of Bank: 15m Length of Bank: 30m 2-94 Celeste Drive West Highland Ck. Scarborough 6 75,000.00 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank ero&on Structures Affected: Two Residences and One Swimming Pool Height of Bank: 20m Length of Bank: 30m ::nnison Rd. & Vicinity Humber River York 7 119,000.00 Problem: Riverbank Erosion (Shale Bank) Structures Affected: Three Residences Height of Bank: 18m Length of Bank: 125m VI . ,. POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY SITES LOCATION I WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY IT~~~NICAL I COMMENTS PRIORITY 1025 Scarlett Road Humber River Etobicoke 8 Problem: Riverbank Erosion (shale bank) Structures Affected: One Low-Rise Apartment Height of Bank: 15m Length of Bank: 35m 146-l60 Humbervale Mimico Creek Etobicoke 9 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Boulevard Structures Affected: Three Residences Height of Bank: 15m Length of Bank: 25m 22 Beaucourt Road Mimico Creek Etobicoke 10 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank Erosion Structures Affected: Two Residences Height of Bank: 18m Length of Bank: 30m 79 Riverhead Drive West Humber Etobicoke 11 Problem: Slope failure (fill material) River Structures Affected: Two Residences Height of Bank: 12m Length of Bank: 15m 87-91 Pegasus Trail East Highland Scarborough 12 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Creek Structures Affected: Two Residences and One Swimming Pool Height of Bank: 12m Length of Bank: 30m 48-50 Barkwin Drive Humber River Etobicoke 13 Problem: Slope failure (fill material) Structures Affected: Two Residences and Two Pools Height of Bank: ISm Length of Bank: 30m 24-26 Delroy Drive Mimico Creek Etobicoke 14 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Structures Affected: Five Residences Height of Bank: 15m Length of Bank: 80m 14 Forest Path Court Humber River Etobicoke 15 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion 0\ Structures Affected: One Residence and One Pool Height of Bank: 8m Length of Bank: 20m on I I-' I-' POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY SITES (') I I-' IV LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS PRIORITY Raymore Drive Humber River Etobicoke 16 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion (shale bank) Structures Affected: Road Height of Bank: 15m Length of Bank: 250m 91 Forest Grove Drive East Don Rivel North York 17 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Structures Affected: One Residence Height of Bank: 23m Length of Bank: 40m Rowntree Mills Park Humber River North York 18 Problem: Major riverbank erosion (Adjacent to Structures Affected: Park Pathway and Parking Lot Aviemore Drive) Height of Bank: 9m Length of Bank: 75m Sunnybrook Hospital West Don River North York 19 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Structures Affected: Gravel Parking Lot Height of Bank: 27m Length of Bank: 70m 40-65 Wynford Hts. East Don River North York 20 Problem: Slope failure and riverbank erosion Crescent Structures Affected: Three Apartment Buildings Height of Bank: 35m Length of Bank: 300m 18-20 Skipton Court Humber River North York 21 Problem: Slope failure Structures Affected: 1 Low-Rise Apartment Height of Bank: 18m Length of Bank: 60m -...J C-13 8 1981 WORK PROGRAMME The following table shows the proposed work programme for 1980 together with the accompanying budget analysis: ITEM ESTIMATED COST DESIGN 31-35 Lakeland Drive 8-14 Azalea Court Su1kara Court II Dennison Road Vicinity $25,000.00 PRIORITY REVIEW 10,000.00 SURVEY AND LEGAL 13,000.00 MAJOR REMEDIAL I 31-35 Lakeland Drive 8-14 Azalea Court 64-70 Grenview Boulevard 93-113 Weir Crescent 435,000.00 MAJOR REMEDIAL II 9-11 Sulkara Court 92-94 Celeste Drive 175,000.00 MINOR REMEDIAL I Sunnybrook Park - 2 Sites 7 A1derbrook Bushbury Drive Scarborough Golf Course 24 Valleyanna Drive Royal York Road and Mimico Creek 73 & 55 Van Dusen Blvd. West Deane Park 92,000.00 MAJOR REMEDIAL III Dennison Road and Vicinity 119,000.00 MINOR REMEDIAL II Revegetation Sites 25,000.00 894,000.00 ---------- ---------- NOTE These cost estimates include expected revenues. . C-14 SCHEDULE "B" EROSION CONTROL AND SLOPE STABILIZATION IN THE REGIONS OF PEEL, YORK AND DURHAM 1981 PROGRAMME AS PROPOSED IN THE INTERIM WATER AND RELATED LAND MANAGEMENT PROJECT 1979-1981 THE METROPOLITAN TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER, 1980 C-15 2 EROSION CONTROL IN THE REGIONS OF PEEL, YORK AND DURHAM - 1981 PROGRAMME Fol10wing the erosion inventory and priority studies that were carried out for the Regions of Peel, York and Durham, a list of proposed remedial work sites were prepared for each region. Since site conditions change continually, the priorities have to be reviewed on a regular basis. The current top priorities are reflected in the work programme for 1981 and the "Pool of Erosion Priority Sites" which are found in the respective sections of this report. It should be noted that for the Regions of York and Durham, the technical priorities identified in the appropriate column of the attached charts follow from the annual erosion priority review. In Peel however, this was not totally possible because of the requirement for "equalized assessment" based on cash flow from the constituent municipalities within the Region. In the lattercase, it was therefore necessary to establish priorities within each municipality and then schedule the sites in descending order. Consequently, it was not possible to adhere to relative priorities established on a regional basis. The table below shows the budget allocation by Regions for the years 1979-1981, inclusive. This is the third year of the Interim Water and Related Land Management Project. REGION 1979 1980 1981 TOTAL Peel 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 York 75,000 75,000 *75,000 225,000 Durham 25,000 25,000 25,000 75,000 *NOTE: The 1981 budget allocation for the Region of York has been increased to $75,000 from the $25,000 originally proposed in the Interim Water and Related Land Management Project. This increase is proposed due to there being a greater number of sites requiring remedial work than originally contemplated. This increase will be subject to recovering the Region of York's approval. The increase will not affect the total levy proposed on the Region of York in the Interim Project due to decreases in costs in the other York benefiting projects.' C-16 3 PROGRESS REPORT The following is a list of sites at which remedial work was carried out between January, 1979 (inception of project~ and September, 1981, as well as sites where work is proposed during the remainder of this year. LOCATION WATERSHED WORK YEAR PEEL 138 King Street Vicinity - Bolton Humber River 1979 (Town of Caledon) Sherway Drive, Mississauga Etobicoke Creek 1979 Wildwood Park, Mississauga Mimico Creek 1979 Mill Street, Brampton Etobicoke Creek 1980 Pony trail Drive & Steepbank Crescent Etobicoke Creek Proposed Vicinity, Mississauga - Phase I 1980 10 BeamiSh, Wildfield (Brampton) West Humber River Proposed (Lindsay Creek) 1980 YORK 7374 Kipling Avenue, Woodbridge Humber River 1979 (Rainbow Creek) 7440 Kipling Avenue, Woodbridge Humber River 1979 (Rainbow Creek) 8240 Pine Valley Drive, WOOdbridge Humber River 1979-1980 14th Avenue, Markham Rouge River 1979-1980 19th Avenue, Markham Rouge River 1979 King Township & Town of Caledon Line Humber River 1979 (Cold Creek) Cedar Grove Community Centre Rouge River 1980 146 Riverside Drive, WOOdbridge Humber River 1980 Postwood Lane, Markham Don River In Progress Islington Avenue Vicinity Humber River Proposed 1980 Pine Grove Vicinity Humber River Proposed 1980 DURHAM 16 Elizabeth Street, Ajax Duffin Creek 1979 558 Pine Ridge Road, Pickering Rouge River 1979 Hockey Ranch, Pickering Duffin Creek 1980 C-17 4 CURRENT PRIORITIES Due to the large number of sites requiring erosion control and slope stabilization work throughout the Regions of Peel, York and Durham, major remedial work is being undertaken on a priority basis. The original priority ratings listed in the three separate Erosion Inventory and Priorities Studies of 1977, are used as a starting point in assessing the rate of progress and deterioration of erosion sites during the years that have elapsed. Based on year-round monitoring, the severity of the problem in its present state and a fair idea of its relative potential to deteriorate, the staff has determined a pool of sites bearing high priority ratings. Because erosion is a dynamic problem~ the priorities within this pool change continually as we strive to ameliorate the list with the steady influx of technical data on site conditions. Therefore, the following list of "current priorities" will be reviewed regularly during 1980 in order to accommodate any significant changes and the possible inclusion of new sites. 1981 WORK PROGRAMME The following table shows the proposed work programme for 1981 and the accompanying budget analysis for each of the Regions of Peel, York and Durham. REGION ITEM ESTIMATED COST PEEL Survey and Legal $1,000.00 Major Remedial I Pony trail & Steepbank, Mississauga 80,000.00 Major Remedial II Kennedy Road 7895 Hurontario Steeet, Brampton 17,000.00 Major Remedial III Centennial Drive 4,500.00 $102,500.00 YORK Survey and Legal 1,000.00 Major Remedial I Nobleton Side road Kennedy Road 25,000.00 Major Remedial II 43 Kleins Ridge Road 5760 White School House Road R. R. #3, Woodbridge 34,000.00 Major Remedial III IBM Golf Course Langstaff Sewage Plant 22,500.00 $83,000.00 DURHAM Survey and Legal 500.00 Major Remedial I Greenwood Road 18,500.00 Major Remedial II Altona Road 378 Woodgrange Avenue 9,000.00 NOTE: The estimated costs include proposed revenues. $28,000.00 . ',~ \ . EROSiOi\J ' PRIORITY . SITES. , . . . . REGION . OF PEEL . . VI t CD r-I . I U - -- .--- PEEL PROPOSED MAJOR -~REMELM.L "WORK '=SITES ,- FOR ~- MISSISSAUGA LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL ESTIMATED COMMENTS \ PRIORITY COST EC-18 Etobicoke Mississauga 1 80,000.00 problem: Riverbank Erosion and Bank Failure 3505-3483 Ponytrail Drive Structures Affected: 12 Residences and 5 Swimming Pools & 1896-1904 Steepbank Cres Height of Bank: 13m Phase II Length of Bank: 310m . . , . 0\ (') . I I ..... \D POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY (') PEEL SITES MISSISSAUGA - 1981 I - IV 0 --~-- LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS PRIORITY Dundas W. of Etobicoke Mississauga 2 Problem: Riverbank Erosion and Slope Failure Neilson Dr. (EC-14) Creek Structures Affected: Open land behind Factory Parking Lots Height of Bank: 9m Length of Bank: 70m Toronto Golf Club Etobicoke Mississauga 3 Problem: Riverbank Erosion and Slope Failure Creek Structures Affected: Parkland Height of Bank: 12m Length of Bank: 80m 1726 Lincolnshire Etobicoke Mississauga 4 Problem: Slope Failure Boulevard Creek Structures Affected: 2 Residences Height of Bank: 10m Length of Bank: 60m ...., PEEL PROPOSED - MAJOR ~REMEDIAl'"!WORK ~SIT.ES '-FOR 1981 - BRAMPTON - LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL ESTIMATED COMMENTS ," PRIORITY COST Kennedy Road Etobicoke Creek Brampton 1 $6,000.00 Problem: Slope Failure Structures Affected: 1 Residence Height of Bank: 10m Length of Bank: 40m 7895 Hurontario Street Etobicoke Creek Brampton 2 11,000.00 Problem: Riverbank Erosion and Slope Failure Structures Affected: 1 Residence Height of Bank: 14m Length of Bank: 50m . .. <Xl . . C". -. - I I ~ . .... l\J I-' PEEL POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY SITES BRAMPTON 1981 () - I ~ LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS PRIORITY n-142 ildfield West Humber Brampton 3 Problem: Riverbank Erosion and Slope Failure River Structures Affected: Greenbelt Behind Houses (Lindsay Creek) Height of Bank: 8m Length of Bank: 30m . \Q . . -. - -- PEEL .PROPOSED -- MAJOR -REMEDIAL -WORK ::c:SI~ES ---FOR 1981 - CALEDON - -. LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL ESTIMATED COMMENTS \ PRIORITY COST :1{-1l0 ;entennia1 Drive, Bolton Humber River Caledon 1 $4,500.00 Problem: Slope Failure (Fil1 Material) Structures Affected: 2 Residences Height of Bank: 35m Length of Bank: 150m . " .... 0 (') .- I I IV W POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY SITES (") I PEEL - CALEDON 1981 !\J A LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS PRIORITY R-I09 Humber River Caledon 2 Problem: Riverbank Erosion ~hind Albert Street Structures Affected: 8 Residences Height of Bank: 2m :;lton Length of Bank: 130m ~ Hickman, Bolton Humber River Caledon 3 Problem: Riverbank Erosion Structures Affected: 1 Residence Height of Bank: 2m Length of Bank: 50m , . . , . . . . '. . f-I - f-I . , . . EROSION PRIORITY . SITES -' . , REGION' " OF YORK . . ..... IV (") I IV V1 , () PROPOSED REMEDIAL" I MAJOR WORK SITES FOR 1981 '" 0'1 _n LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL ESTIMATED COMMENTS PRIORITY COST 3 Klein's Ridge Humber River Vaughan 1 $ 5,000.00 Problem: Slope failure Structures Affected: 1 Residence Height of Bank: 11m Length of Bank: 40m ~nnedy Road (West) Rouge River Markham 2 $ "8,800.00 Problem: Major riverbank erosion "t 28 Structures Affected: 1 Residence Height of Bank: 2m Length of Bank: 40m ~~gstaff Sewage Plant East Don River Markham 3 $12,200.00 Problem: Riverbank erosion Structures Affected: Road . Height of Bank: 4m Length of Bank: 30m :.;bleton Humber River Vaughan 4 $16,000.00 Problem: Riverbank erosion and slope failure . ,t 5, Conc. 8 Structures Affected: 1 pool and Filter Shed Height of Bank: 3m Length of Bank: 20m /60 White School Humber River Vaughan 5 $ 8,000.00 Problem: Riverbank erosion and bank failure House Road Structures Affected: 1 Garage Height of Bank: 4m Length of Bank: 50m . R. i3, Woodbridge Humber River Vaughan 6 $17,000.00 Problem: Riverbank erosion .t 21, Conc. a Structures Affected: 1 Tennis Court Height of Bank: 3m Length of Bank: ,100m :M Golf Course Rouge River Markham 7 $15,000.00 Problem: Riverbank erosion and slope failure" Structures Affected: Golf Course Tee Area Height of Bank: 14m Length of Bank: aOm . .... w POOL OF EROSION PRIORITY SITES LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL COMMENTS PRIORITY Bayview above Steeles East Don Markham 8 Problem: Riverbank erosion and slope failure River Structures Affected: I Shack Height of Bank: 11m Length of Bank: 30m 16 Doncrest Road East Don Markham 9 Problem: Riverbank erosion and slope failure River Structures Affected: I Residence Height of Bank: 5m Length of Bank: 12m .... ~ (') I "- -...I - - -- n I '" CXl . EROSION: PRIOR,ITY SITES . REGION . OF,. DURHA'M - I-' U1 I.. I.':' : : . . DURHAM ~r-<Ot-JOS~D MAJOR Rt.fv1t.OIAL' WORK SiTES FOR 198f I I I LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY TECHNICAL ESTIMATED COMMENTS PRIORITY . COST Greenwood Road Duffin Creek Pickering 1 $15,000 PROBLEM: Riverbank erosion & slope failure. STRUCTURES AFFECTED: 1 residence & pool. HEIGHT OF BANK: 18 m LENGTH OF BANK: 30 m Across from 1815 Petticoat Creek Pickering 2 $ 8,000 PROBLEM: Riverbank erosion. . . Altona Road (R-7) STRUCTURES AFFECTED: Road. HEIGHT OF BANK: 3 m . , LENGTH OF BANK: 40 m 378 Woodgrange Rouge River Pickering 3 $ 4,500 PROBLEM: Slope failure. STRUCTURES AFFECTED: 1 residence. HEIGHT OF BANK: 8 m , I f LENGTH OF BANK: 30 m I I . , ..... 0\ (') . I IV \D n POOL 'OF EROSION PRIORITY I DURHAM SITES 1981 w 0 LOCATION WATERSHED MUNICIPALITY APPROX. COMMENTS PRIORITY COST Green River Park Duffin Creek Pickering 4 PROBLEM: Riverbank erosiqn. (D-16) ST~UCTURES AFFECTED: Outdoor Dining Pavilion HEIGHT OF BANK: 6 m LENGTH OF BANK: 50 m . w 1840 Altona Road Petticoat Pickering 5 PROBLEM: Riverbank erosion. (D-15 ) Creek STRUCTURES AFFECTED: 1 residence and pool. HEIGHT OF BANK: 105m LENGTH OF BANK: 40 m . .... -..I . 1981 BUDGET ESTI~~TES I\'.!.SIO~ WATER RESOURCE -.~::;?~.1 FLOOD CONTROL c::::SIO~ U~aT FLOOD CONTROL PLANNING & REMEDIAL MEASURES ?~?~!SOR ACCO~~TABLE J. C. MATHER -- -------- --- - --- ---- ----- S:::CISIO~ BUDGET 1981 BUDGET SOURCES OF FUNDING 1980 ::)............. ........ CODE (1980 ) EXPE~ REV. I NET EXPEN. I CUMULATIVE PROVo I ~~~C. I OTHER EXPEN. I RSV. .. ..-.,-;\..-..~.;:. GRANT Jak Ridges 58,000 58,000 58,000 31,900 26,100 eating Channel 200,000 200,000 258,000 110,000 90,000 (Dredging) reliminary 130,000 130,000 388,000 71,500 58,500 . ngineering nvironmenta1 72,000 72,000. 460,000 39,600 32,400 ;tudies apping 50,000 50,000 510,000 27,500 22,500 .aster Drainage lanning Assist '10,000 10,000 520,000 5,500 4,500 3.tershed Mgmt. ~tudies 20,000 20,000 540,000 11,000 9,000 0'l'AL 540,000 540,000 540,000 297,000 243,000 Jl'ES: 1981 Budget Item for Oak Ridges assumes Exp. of $50,000. in 1980. If this en does not occur, Total Amount of $108,000. must be allocated in 1981. () - Si C I C t"' ...... t>:I (' I : I ()t.. :1- () I (.oJ 1981 BUDGET ESTIMATES r-.; '!V!SIO~ WATER RESOURCE ':::J~:t~":'1 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL ::::!510:\ tr.iIT EROSION CONTROL - METRO ~?:::~V!SOR ACCOv~TABLE R. W. DEWELL - ::;:::':IS!O~ BUDGET 1981 BUDGET SOORCES oe FONDIRG ~ 1980 ? ;'C;\.~.G:: CODE (1980) EXPEN. REV. NET EXPEN. CUMULATIVE PROV. I MU~!C. I OTHER EX?EN. I REV. GR.'\NT LEVY Metro 894,000 44,000 850,000 850,000 467,500 382,500 I --------- - -- ~O~::S : Increase from 1980 in order to match Interim Project I .' I\J I 1981 BUDGET ESTIMATES VIS!O~ WATER RESOURCE ~G?.;:.! EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL :::~SIO~ U~IT EROSION CONTROL - PEEL, YORK & DURHAM ?~~V!SOR ACCOUNTABLE J.D. TUCKER ,=:::IS:O~ BUDGET 1981 BUDGET SOURCES OF FUNDI~G 1980 .=-.C:\"':'..G;: CODE (1980) EXPEN. REV. NET EXPEN. CUMULATIVE PROVo I MUNIC. OTHER EXPEN. I REV. GRANT LEVY - I EEL Mississauga 80,000 80,000 80,000 44,000 36,000 Brampton 17,000 2,000 15,000 95,000 8,250 6,750 Caledon 5,500 500 5,000 100,000 2,200 1,800 ORK 83,000 8,000 75,000 175,000 41,250 33,750 JRHAM 28,000 3,000 25,000 200,000 13,750 11,250 ==========- ======== ======z:===::r= ========== ------- F========= ------- TOTAL 213,500 13,500 200,000 200,000 110,000 90,000 --- I~":"C. York increased to $75,000 from $25,000 as indicated in Interim Project. ..._w. This may be possible due to reduction in cost of Oak Ridges from the Original Estimate in Interim Project. I w I (') I W W (') I w 1981 BUDGET ESTIMATES ~ '.':S!O~ WATER RESOURCE .J::; ?~;':,1 FLOOD CONTROL C!SlO~ milT RIVER FORECASTING, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ?~?~ISOR ~CCOUNTABLE D. R. HALEY - --- ;EClSIO~ BUDGET 1981 BUDGET SOURCES OF FUNDING 1980 '.:'.:::":'~G::: CODE (1980 ) EXPEN. I REV. I NET EXPEN. I CUMULATIVE PROVo I MUNIC. I OTHER EX?E~. I REV. GR.;NT LEVY ------ - aireville Dam 34,000 34,000 34,000 18,700 15,300, Ross Lord Dam 27,000 27,000 61,000 14,850 12,150 :lor Warning 25,000 25,000 86,000 13,750 11,250 stem - :::ration :lod Warning 33,000 33,000 119,000 18,150 14,850 stem Equip. ::ldelling ~AL 119,000 119,000 119,000 65,450 53,550 'l'ES: I ". .' I 1981 BUDGET ESTIMATES V!SIO~ WATER RESOURCE ~CG?-;':'1 FLOOD CONTROL G:SIO~ U~IT MAINTENANCE :~:::?VIS:)R ACCOu~TABLE R. W. DEWELL l -- ;2CISIO~ BUDGET 1981 BUDGET SOURCES OF FUNDING 1980 ~.:'.C:_;G~ CODE (1980) EXPEN. J REV. I NET EXPEN. I CUMULATIVE PROVo I MUNIC. I OTHER EXPEN. I REV. GR.l\NT LEVY :;m<i 11 Dams I 16,000 16,000 16,000 :4jor :.aintenance 35,000 35,000 51,000 'lood Control . :h<innel 74,000 74,000 125,00(} :1"'osion Contro 'h",nnel 5,000 5,000 130,000 ------------ -------------- ----------- ------- -------- ------------ -------------- ----------- ------- -------- TOTAL 130,000 130,000 1~0,000 71,500 58,500 I ------ ----- ;T:::S: I " VI I n I w VI . (") I w 1981 BUDGET ESTIMATES 0'1 JISION P ROPE RTY ; :;?-~':.1 LAND ACQUISITION .!S:O:~ USIT '~~VISOR ACCOu~TAELE D. J. PRINCE :CIS~O~ BUDGET 1981 BUDGET SOURCES OF FUNDI~G 19 SO .............,...- CODE (1980) EXPEN. REV. NET EXPEN. CUMUL..ll.TIVE PROVo iWNIC. OTHER EXP:::~ . I aEV. -.\"":'\.-.\W':' .. GRANT LEVY . aterfront azard Land 200,000.00 - 200,000.00 200,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 :>.11ey Hazard 1,091,140.50 - 1,091,140.50 1,291,140.50 600,127.28 491,013.22 Conservation "'-nd 1,291,140.50 - 1,291,140.50 1,291,140.50 700,127.28 591,013.22 I ,-:~S : I 0\ I