HomeMy WebLinkAboutExecutive Committee 2002t■
erTHE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #1/02
February 22, 2002
The Executive Committee Meeting #1/02, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek
Pioneer Village, on Friday, February 22, 2002. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting
to order at 9 :36 a.m.
PRESENT
Lorna Bissell Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn_ O'Connor Member
REGRETS
Maria Augimeri Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Ron Moeser Member
RES. #B1 /02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #11/01, held on January 18, 2002, be approved.
CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #B2 /02 - YORK REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Request for release of Authority's interest in a right -of -way, southeast of
Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed, CFN 25850. The Authority is in receipt of a request from the
York Region District School Board, the owner of the property located
east of Islington Avenue on the south side of Rutherford Road, in the City
of Vaughan, for the Authority to release any and all interest in a
right -of -way situate on the west limit of the site. The right -of -way exists in
a legal form only and is not at this time being used or required for access
by the Authority.
1
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from the York Region District School
Board to release any and all interest In a right -of -way situate on the south side of
Rutherford Road, east of Islington Avenue, in the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality
of York;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of the Authority that It is in the best interest of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to cooperate with the York Region District School Board in this instance;
THAT the Authority Quit Claim its interest in a small parcel of land containing 0.289 acres
(0.117 hectares), more or less, to the York Region District School Board, said land being
Part Lot 15, Concession 7, further being described as Part 2 on Plan 65R- 17485, City of
Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York;
THAT consideration Is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, with the York Region District
School Board being responsible for all legal and other costs involving the release in the
right -of -way;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The subject right -of -way is part of a much larger parcel of land that was acquired by the
Authority on February 21, 1964, from Joseph and Mildred Tasca, under the Boyd Dam and
Reservoir Project.
At Meeting #6/94 held on July 22, 1994, under Resolution #A154/94, the Authority approved
the sale of 14.990 acres of the former Tasca property, which was surplus to the requirements of
the Authority, to the York Region District School Board. This sale was completed on March 7,
1995.
A condition of the sale was that the Authority be allowed to retain a 5 metre right -of -way across
the west limit of the lands being conveyed. This right -of -way was required for access to
adjacent Authority holdings to the south of this site.
At Meeting #6/96 held on July 26, 1996, under Resolution #A133/96, the Authority approved
the sale of 21.909 acres of land located south of the land sold to the York Region District
School Board. This land was surplus to the requirements of the Authority. The sale was
completed on September 10, 1997. Since the Authority no longer owns the lands that the
right -of -way was retained to access, the right -of -way is no longer required.
2
A plan illustrating this location is attached.
Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Date: January 21, 2002
Attachments: 1
3
Attachment 1
4
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES. #B3/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
. conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.1 - 8.1.7, inclusive) which are listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF TORONTO [EAST YORK COMMUNITY]
8.1.1 NOLAN YEARWOOD & DARLENE CROTEAU
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 55, 56, Plan M -623, (5 Hale Court), in the
City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Nolan Yearwood & Darlene Croteau.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a
7.3 metre by 2.4 metre two-storey rear addition to the existing residence. The proposed works
involve the construction of an open stairwell on a concrete slab on grade foundation,
connecting the basement walk -out with the main floor level.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 1, 2002 to January 31, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
Site Plan, Drawing No. Al, prepared by David Fujiwara Architect, dated December 14,
2001, date received January 2, 2002.
RATIONALE .
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
5
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a
7.3 metre by 2.4 metre two- storey rear addition to the existing residence. The proposed works
involve the construction of an open stairwell on a concrete slab on grade foundation,
connecting the basement walk -out with the main floor level.
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located outside the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the proposed
works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected from the proposed works as they are located approximately 70
metres from the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed stairwell is located approximately 20 metres from the top of bank of the valley
slope associated with Taylor Massey Creek. The proposed works are not expected to impact
on any significant resource features and there are no slope stability /geotechnical issues
associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32768
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: January 4, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO [MIDTOWN COMMUNITY]
Application #: 007 /02/TOR
8.1.2 TED QUANG BUI
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot G, Plan 3960, (66 Greenbrook Drive),
in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Ted Quang Bui.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area in order to facilitate the
construction of a new addition to an existing home.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 1, 2002 to January 31, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Basement and Ground Floor Plan, Wood Deck Details, Proposed
Elevations, Drawing Nos. Al, A2, A3 & A4, prepared by Paul R. Stilo and Associates
Ltd., dated February 2001, date received December 3, 2001.
6
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a
new addition to an existing home. Approximately 40% (or Tess) of the new addition is located
within the fill regulated area, and has been designed to maintain grades, remain on tableland,
and preserve existing trees. The northwest corner of the home is located approximately 2
metres from the top of bank area, and the proposed addition has been designed to remain
approximately 8 metres back from the top of bank area. The proposed addition is consistent
with existing development in the corridor reach.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Humber River and accordingly, there are no impacts to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be installed between the proposed works and the top of bank in order to
prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed addition has been designed to maintain grades and preserve existing
vegetation, and is consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. There are no
significant resource features on site, and there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues
associated with the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2. Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 32697
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: December 6, 2001
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 359/01/TOR
8.1.3 RICK & ADA FRANZESE
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 14, Concession 7, Lot 38, Plan
65M -2852, (32 Marywood Crt.), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Rick & Ada Franzese.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill to facilitate construction of an inground pool.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 1, 2002 to January 31, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
7
• Proposed pool layout for 32 Marywood Court, prepared by applicant, received
January 9, 2002.
Site Plan and Construction Notes prepared by applicant, received January 4, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of an inground pool
within the Fill Regulated area of the Humber River. In addition a 1 metre retaining wall will be
built adjacent to the house. The proposed works are located on a lot in an approved plan of
subdivision backing onto the Humber River valley. The proposed pool is set back
approximately 5 metres from the top of bank.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm flood plain. Therefore, there will
be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment control fence will be installed and maintained to prevent sediments from entering
the Humber River.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on a lot that backs onto a valley outside the Regional Storm
flood plain. There are no significant resource features on the site. The proposed pool is
approximately 5 metres from the top of bank, but geotechnical concerns related to the
proposal have been addressed to the satisfaction TRCA staff. The retaining wall does not
impact the valley feature. The proposed works are consistent with the corridor reach. All
excess fill material will be removed from the site as part of the work. .
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32788
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: January 9, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 017 /02/VAUG
8.1.4 SHARON EASTON
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 90, Plan 7326,
(63 Walkerton Drive - Unionville), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Sharon Easton.
8
The purpose is to demolish an existing addition and construct new family sitting room addition
on the existing footprint, within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the
Rouge River, as well as the Unionville Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 1, 2002 to January 31, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Proposed Addition Plan prepared by Sandgate Construction Inc. dated November 6,
2001; received January 16, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of demolishing an existing addition at the rear of the dwelling and
construct a new family sitting room addition on tie existing footprint. The existing foundation
consists of a concrete slab on- grade. New caissons will be dug below grade and filled with
concrete to support the concrete pad and new structure. The entire property is located within
the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River, as well as the
Unionville Special Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
The expected depth of flooding at the proposed addition site under Regional Storm conditions
is 0.3 metres'above grade. The floor of the new addition will be situated above the Regional
Storm flood elevation. All fill material excavated for the new foundation caissons will be
removed from the site. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected by the proposed
works.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected during construction, since the work site is located approximately
180 metres from the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is located on the relatively level area of the Rouge River stream corridor at
this location. There are no slope instability / geotechnical issues evident at this site. No .
significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works; all disturbed areas will
be revegetated following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1(C) - Existing Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32824
Report Prepared by: George Lela, extension 5342
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 22, 2002
9
Application #: 022 /02 /MARK
8.1.5 UNIONVILLE ARMS
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 12, Concession 5, (189 and 193 Main Street -
Unionville), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Unionville Arms.
The purpose is to construct a breezeway addition to link two restaurant buildings, within the
Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Bruce Creek, as well as the Unionville
Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of to in accordance with the following documents and
plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan prepared by The Gregory Design Group (overlaid on a copy of Plan of
Survey by R. G. McKibbon Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyor dated August 27, 1980);
received November 6, 2001.
• Red -line Revised Floor / Elevation Plan prepared by The Gregory Design Group,
Project 658.01, Drawing A.1 dated October 2001; received November 6, 2001.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of constructing a breezeway addition to link two restaurant buildings.
There is no excavation or foundation required, as the floor of the proposed addition will be
suspended approximately 0.3 metres above grade to match the floor elevation of the two
restaurant buildings. The entire property is located within the Fill Regulated Area of the Bruce
Creek. The majority of the site is situated within the Regional Storm flood plain and the
Unionville Special Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
The finished floor level will be located above the Regional Storm flood elevation. The expected
depth of flooding at the proposed addition site is 0.2 metres above grade; the floor will be 0.8
metres above grade. There will be no fill placement as part of the proposed works; therefore,
the control of flooding will not be affected.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected during construction, as the work site is located approximately
115 metres from the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is located on the relatively level area of the Bruce Creek stream corridor.
There are no slope instability / geotechnical issues evident at this site. No significant resource
features will be impacted by the proposed works. As noted above, there will be no ground
disturbance at the construction site.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1(C) - Existing Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's
10
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32839
Report Prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 23, 2002
Application #: 028 /02 /MARK
8.1.6 VILLAGE GRILL RESTAURANT
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 12, Concession 5, (149 Main Street - Unionville),
in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Village Grill Restaurant.
The purpose is to demolish an existing frame addition and construct a new one storey kitchen
addition to the rear of the existing restaurant building, within the Regional Storm flood plain and
Fill Regulated Area of the Bruce Creek, as well as the Unionville Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 1, 2002 to January 31, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan prepared by The Gregory Design Group dated October 2001; received
December 6, 2001.
• Floor and Elevation Plans prepared by The Gregory Design Group, Project 643.01,
Drawings A.1, A.2, A.3, A.4, and A.5 dated November 2001; received December 6,
2001.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of demolishing an existing frame addition and constructing a new one
storey kitchen addition to the rear of the existing restaurant building. There will be no
'excavation required for the new addition. The new kitchen will be constructed on a remnant
concrete block foundation which was left in -place from a former structure in existence prior to
the smaller frame addition to be demolished. Only the site of the proposed addition is located
within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Bruce Creek; the
remainder of the restaurant / property is outside the flood plain. The flood plain portion of the
subject lands is also situated within the Unionville Special Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
Thefinished floor level of the proposed kitchen addition will be located above the Regional
Storm flood elevation. The depth of flooding expected under Regional Storm conditions at the
addition site is 0.4 metres above grade. The finished floor in the new addition will be 0.7 metres
above the existing ground level at the building site. There will be no excavation or fill placement
as part of the proposed works; therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected.
11
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected during construction, as the work site is located approximately
110 metres from the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is located on the relatively level area of the Bruce Creek stream corridor.
There are no slope instability / geotechnical issues evident at this site. No significant resource
features will be impacted by the proposed works. As noted above, there will be no change in
grade resulting from the proposed construction.
Policy Guidelines: .
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1(C) - Existing Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32838
Report Prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 23, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 027 /02 /MARK
8.1.7 TONY PACITTO
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 40, Concession 1, Part Lot 77, 78, 79, 80,
Plan 1960, (87 Birch Avenue), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Tony Pacitto.
The purpose is to construct a new residence on the subject lands. Proposed works within the
regulated area are removing a portion of an existing gravel driveway and a frame garage, and
minor regrading.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 1, 2002 to January 31, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan - Lot Siting and Grading prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc. last revised
January 17, 2002 and received January 21, 2002. The plans have been red line
revised to indicate a sediment fence extension.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of reconstructing a house on the subject lands. An existing frame
garage and a portion of an existing driveway will be removed to facilitate house construction.
Disturbed areas will be regraded and sodded. The proposed replacement home will be
constructed outside the regulated area.
12
The driveway is located adjacent to ESA #71 "Richvale Forest ".
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are outside the Regional Storm flood plain. There will be no impact on
the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be installed between the works and the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
No works will be completed within the ESA.
A geotechnical report was reviewed by TRCA staff and found to be satisfactory. As the existing
driveway is in the slope hazard area, staff recommended that an alternate driveway be added
to the site plan with a note that access will be gained through the alternate driveway should
re- development of the site occur, or slope instability make use of the current driveway unsafe.
No structures will be built within the slope hazard area. No filling will take place in the slope
hazard area.
The disturbed area will be sodded after the driveway has been removed and all construction
materials will be disposed of off site.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.2.2 D) - "Replacement Structures" of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32791
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: January 11, 2002
13
Application #: 020 /02 /RH
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
_R_ ES. #84/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT permits be granted inaccordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.8 - 8.1.10, inclusive), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items, for
which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF TORONTO [ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY]
8.1.8 FRANK RASO
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 196, Block D, Plan , Plan 1686, (35 The
Kingsway), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Frank Raso.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the demolition of the
existing residence and the construction of a new single family residence on a similar building
footprint.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 1, 2002 to January 31, 2004.
• Red -lined Site Plan Building Section Project Data, Basement Floor Plan, Ground Floor
Plan, Second Floor Plan, North & West Elevations, and South & East Elevations & Loft
Level Plan & Joist Schedule, Sheet No. A1.0, A2.0, A2.1, A2.2, A3.1, & A3.2, prepared
by Eugene Kuan Architect, dated November 10, 2001, date received December 4,
2001.
• Revised Partial Site Plan showing new retaining wall location and construction detail.
• Sheet No. 2/A1.0, prepared by Eugene Kuan Architect, date received January 16,
2001.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill in a regulated area to facilitate the
removal of the existing house and attached garage and replacing it with a new single family
residence. The proposed new house will maintain a similar building footprint, although
somewhat larger, involving an extension on the northerly side of the house, away from the top
of bank, but will also involve shifting the new house back from the top of bank on the
southeasterly side, 3 metres to 5.5 metres back from the existing corner of the house. Due to
this reduction on the southeasterly side, a new retaining wall is proposed in order to stabilize
the area presently supported by the existing house foundation. The new retaining wall will be
situated between the existing pool and the new residence.
14
Control of Flooding:
The property is located outside the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore, the proposed works
will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Appropriate erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during construction to
prevent sediment from entering the watercourses.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed new residence will have a greater setback from the top of bank than the existing
residence. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach
and are not expected to impact on any significant resource features. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32766
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: January 4, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO [NORTH YORK COMMUNITY]
Application #: 009 /02/TOR
8.1.9 CITY OF TORONTO "
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 5, 6, Plan M -988, in the
City of Toronto (North York), Humber River Watershed as located on the property
owned by The Toronto And Region Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the
construction of stream bank erosion protection works to provide protection for an existing
sanitary trunk sewer manhole.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 1, 2002 to January 31, 2004.
• Black Creek S.T.S. Erosion Protection at M.H. No. 111, Drawing No. 1237 - 2000 -07,
prepared by City of Toronto Works & Emergency Services, dated January 22, 2002,
date received January 23, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
15
Proposal:
The proposal is to alter a watercourse and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the
construction of stream bank erosion protection measures to protect an existing sanitary trunk
sewer manhole, MH No. 111, with all works being undertaken within the easement. The
proposed works involve the placement of stone over Terrafix geotextile.
Control of Flooding:
The works will have minimal impacts on flooding. All excess excavated material will be
removed from the site.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during construction to
prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
Potential impacts to fish habitat can be mitigated through the use of erosion control measures,
site restoration and completing instream works during warm water timing guidelines (July 1 to
March 31). All works will be undertaken within the City of Toronto easement and completed
from top of bank.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 5.2 - Erosion Control and Slope Stability Remedial
Works - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. The works are
being carried out within the existing easement.
CFN: 31398
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 12, 2000
TOWN OF WHITCHURCH - STOUFFVILLE
Application #: 186/00/NY
8.1.10 ENBRIDGE CONSUMERS GAS
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 35, Concession
8, (South East Corner of Highway 48 and Stouffville Road), in the Town of
Whitchurch- Stouffville, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Ministry of Transportation - Ontario.
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill material as part of the construction of a regulator
station and associated piping, within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of
the Little Rouge River.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 1, 2002 to January 31, 2004.
• Plan prepared by Enbridge Consumers Gas, Project L- 26599, Drawing 30- 7988 -02
dated December 10, 2001; received January 24, 2002.
16
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and replacing fill material as part of the construction of a
regulator station and associated piping. The regulator station will be connected to a natural
gas main previously installed in this vicinity and approved by the Executive Committee at
Meeting # 12/00 on December 1, 2000 (Permit No. C- 00303; CFN 31793). The entire site is
located within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the Little Rouge River.
Control of Flooding:
The regulator station will be completed sealed and floodproofed. All existing grades will be
maintained and excess fill material will be removed from the site. Therefore, the control of
flooding will not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will encircle the work area to impede the overland migration of
construction - generated sediments.
Conservation of Land:
The entire site is located on the level area of the Little Rouge River stream corridor. There are
no slope instability / geotechnical issues or fisheries concerns evident at this site. All
construction activity will occur within the Highway No. 48 / Stouffville road right -of -way (ROW),
30 metres north of the Little Rouge River culvert beneath the highway. The ROW is maintained
as a grassed area; the proposed works will not impact any adjacent wetland or riparian areas,
nor will any other significant resource features be impacted during construction. All backfilled
and disturbed areas will be revegetated following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32847
Report Prepared by: George Le'a, extension 5342
For Information contact: Russe White, extension 5306
Date: January 23, 2002
Application #: 032/02/WS
RES. #B5/02 - YORK PEEL DURHAM GROUNDWATER STUDY PHASE 2 —
SOFTWARE
Acquire groundwater software for York Peel Durham (YPD) partner
agencies at discounted rate.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Irene Jones
17
THAT 10 copies of Earthfx software "Viewlog" be purchased through the York Peel
Durham Groundwater Management Strategy study for each of the partnership agencies at
a total discounted price of $39,500, plus GST and PST.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The York Peel Durham (YPD) Groundwater Management Strategy Study has moved into the
second phase of the study, which involves the development of a consistent groundwater
management program and associated technical products to support its implementation by the
study partners. The YPD Study partners include the Regions of York, Peel and Durham as well
as their conservation authorities including the Credit Valley Conservation Authority (CVC), the
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA), the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA), the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA), the Kawartha
Region Conservation Authority (KRCA), and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority.
Upon approval of the Executive Committee at Meeting #10/01, a consultant has been retained
to move forward with assembling a data management system for the project. Each partner
requires software to facilitate viewing and manipulation of the groundwater data.
RATIONALE
The YPD Team (consisting of Planning and Public Works staff from the Regions of York, Peel
and Durham as well as staff from CVC, LSRCA, TRCA, CLOCA, KRCA, GRCA) has reviewed
groundwater software products available and found only one product to be available for readily
viewing, interpreting and accessing groundwater related information in an efficient manner.
Viewlog is consistent for use with the data model currently being developed for the YPD Study.
The YPD Team is recommending that the Team move forward with the acquisition of Viewlog
software for manipulating and viewing geological and hydrogeological information. Viewlog is
a user friendly and robust software package that will allow public sector staff from the partner
agencies with the first real opportunity to easily access information from the Ministry of the
Environment's Water Well record database. The software allows for easy construction of
geological cross sections, interpolation of geological and hydrogeological surfaces,
geostatistical analysis of data, and provides a see through window to any groundwater
database stored in Microsoft Access. The software has been used with tremendous success
by staff at the Region of Halton and at the Grand River Conservation Authority. The YPD Team
has met with the vendor of the software and has worked out an agreement to obtain a 25%
discount on the software should all agencies acquire the software. The YPD Team is
recommending that the YPD Study proceed with the purchase of the software for all agencies.
The software purchase fits into the overall YPD strategic work plan which is geared to providing
consistency and improving overall groundwater management across the Regions of York, Peel
and Durham. Upon seeing a demonstration of the capabilities of the software and from
previous staff experience with the product all YPD Team members are very supportive of this
purchase.
18
FINANCIAL DETAILS
There is sufficient funding in the York Peel Durham Groundwater Management Strategy Study
(Account # 115 -90) budget to purchase the software for all of the YPD partner agencies.
Report prepared by: Steve Hoiysh, 905 - 336 -1158, extension 246
Date: January 24, 2002
RES. #B6 /02 - BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE, CITY OF TORONTO
Tender Opening Sub - Committee. Tender ES02 -01 - Repairs To The
Printer And Weaver Shop. Award of a contract for the repairs to the
Printer and Weaver Shop at Black Creek Pioneer Village, City of Tdronto.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Irene Jones
THAT Tender ES02 -01 for the Repairs to the Printer and Weaver Shop, be awarded to J.D.
Strachan Construction Ltd. at a total cost of $73,300 (excluding GST).
AND FURTHER THAT staff, in consultation with the project Architect, be authorized to
approve additional unspecified expenditures to a maximum of fifteen percent of the total
cost of the work to J.D. Strachan Construction Ltd., if deemed necessary.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND'
In 1999, the Authority approved the Future Directions Strategy for Black Creek Pioneer Village.
A major part of the strategy is the capital projects for Restoration of buildings and new
attractions infrastructure. These projects totaled $6 million over a 5 year period. The Building
Restoration program has been ongoing since the year 2000.
RATIONALE
Sealed bids were invited from five Contractors pre - qualified by the project Architect, Goldsmith
Borgal & Company Ltd., and were opened on Friday, February 1, 2002 by the Tender Opening
Sub - Committee.
The bids received were as follows:
Bidder
Bid
(excl. GST)
7%
GST
Total Bid
(incl. GST)
J.D. Strachan Construction Ltd.
$73,300
$5,131
$78,431
Roof Tile Management
$89,000
$6,230
$95,230
Maxim Group General Contracting Ltd.
$102,050
$7,143
$109,193
Sandgate Construction
$106,400
$7,448
$113,848
Rutherford Contracting Ltd.
$147,000
$10,290
$157,290
19
Authority staff have reviewed the tenders submitted, in consultation with the project Architect,
and recommend that Contract ES02 -01 for the Repairs to the Black Creek Pioneer Village
Printer and Weaver Shop be awarded to J.D. Strachan Construction Ltd.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The approved Black Creek Pioneer Village, Building Restoration Program budget for the year
2002 is $605,000. Funding for the project is available within this program budget in account
number 503 -75.
For Information contact: Jim Berry, 416 - 392 -9721 or Marty Brent extension 5403.
Date: February 11, 2002
RES. #B7/02 - EAST POINT PARK PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
City of Toronto Waterfront Development Project. To retain a consultant to
complete the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in
accordance with Ministry of the Environment Guidelines on Site
Investigations and remedial procedures
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Irene Jones
THAT the firm of Terraprobe Limited, be retained to complete the Phase II ESA for East
Point Park, Scarborough Ontario at a total upset cost limit of $18,501 (not including GST).
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 1990 the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) informed the Toronto & Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) that abnormally high PCB concentrations were found in surface water
samples from an outfall pipe located at the end of Beechgrove Road (East Point Park). The
TRCA undertook site investigative measures and no evidence was found, thus no action was
taken at that time. In 1996 the storm water system in the area was upgraded, at which time
elevated metals, PCB's and petroleum hydrocarbons were identified in analytical samples. A
subsequent geophysical survey indicated evidence of possible sources of contamination
(buried drums, tanks etc).
An underground storage tank (UST) removal program was undertaken as well as a Phase I
ESA for a 0.8 Ha. parcel of land within East Point Park once occupied by industrial operations.
UST removal confirmatory samples continued to indicate the presence of PCB contamination
and three monitoring wells were installed and routinely monitored. The Phase I report
recommended further investigative measures be undertaken in order to define areas and
quantities of contamination.
20
RATIONALE
Invitations were sent out to eight environmental /geotechnical engineering firms to provide
proposals for the provision of professional services to undertake the Phase II works. A Terms of
Reference (ToR) was also provided to each firm to base their scope of work and fee schedule
upon. Two firms declined to submit due to previous work commitments; the six received are as
follows:
FIRM
Trow Consulting Engineers
Terraprobe Limited
Marshall Macklin Monaghan
Golder Associates
Conestoga- Rovers & Associates
Gartner Lee Limited
TOTAL FEES
$ 18,000
$ 14,719
$ 15,900
$ 21,170
$ 17,690
$ 18,760
Terrprobe also submitted an additional scope of work for extra soil and water sampling off site
for an additional $ 3,782 (not including GST). All other firms included this scope of work in their
base costs except Golder Associates.
A total budget of $20,000 was set in the Terms of Reference
Proposal evaluation by Staff was based on 11 criteria encompassing the following generalized
elements:
• Firms understanding of the scope of work to be completed
• Methodology and proposed work plan including number of test pits and associated
analytical sampling schedule.
• Study team expertise, qualifications and corporate experience
• Quality and completeness of the proposal.
Based upon review of Terraprobe's proposal, in particular the aggressive scope of work, and
experience in this.type of work, it is recommended that Terraprobe's proposal be accepted at a
total cost of $ 14,719 (not including GST) with the option to exercise the additional work at $
3,782 (not including GST) if required.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The purpose of the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment is to complete a detailed
investigative program including the advancement of test pits throughout the subject property to
identify potential source(s) of contamination through visual, alfactory and analytical review.
Also as part of the assignment, the potential of off-site contamination influencing on -site
conditions is to be investigated and commented on. As part of the reporting, the consultant
shall prepare a summary report, suitable for MOE submittal if required, clearly documenting
the means and methods utilized, results obtained, definition of contamination, remedial
recommendations (if any) & estimated costs of remedial works (if any).
21
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds to complete the Phase II ESA for East Point Park are available under the City of Toronto
Waterfront Development Project, Account No, 222 -15.
Report prepared by: Jim Wraith, 416 - 392 -9731
For Information contact: Jim Wraith, 416- 392 -9731
Date: January 22, 2002
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:40 a.m., on February 22, 2002.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
22
ITEM 1
h
PirTHE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #2/02
March 1, 2002
The Executive Committee Meeting #2/02, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office, on
Friday, March 1, 2002. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:34 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri .Member
Lorna Bissell Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Ron Moeser Member
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
RES. #B8 /02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/02, held on February 22, 2002, be approved.
CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #B9 /02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed
Roberto and Lisa Forletta
CFN 32652. Acquisition of a conservation easement, located on the
south side of King Road, east of Highway 27, Township of King, Regional
Municipality of York, in the Humber River Watershed.
Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Seconded by: Lorna Bissell
23
y i1
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the
protection of the environmental features and functions containing 0.53 hectares, (1.31
acres) more or less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land be purchased from
Roberto and Lisa Forletta, said land being Part of Lot 5, Concession 8, Township of King,
Regional Municipality of York, designated as Parts 3 and 6, Plan 65R- 24466, Township of
King, on the south side of King Road, east of Highway 27;
THAT the purchase price of the easement be $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the easement required free from
encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005.
Roberto and Lisa Forletta have submitted an Application for Consent to sever their property for
residential purposes. One of the conditions requires a conservation easement over the valley
lands on both the retained and severed parcels to be registered to the satisfaction of the
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's solicitor, Mr. Daniel Musso of Bianchi
Presta, Barristers & Solicitors.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the taking of this easement.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The lands subject to this easement will continue to be in private ownership. As such, the
owners will be responsible for taxes and maintenance.
Report prepared by: Michael Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Michael Fenning, extension 5223
Date: February 13, 2002
Attachments:1
24
NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND AODUISMON PROJECT 2001-2005. 3>
Flood Plato end Consendetico Oornponertt, Humber River Watenired =
Roberto Ind Use Fcxletts OI
CFN 32862 =
424.4
- \) '3
cp
4-7 •
24,
t: 0T
PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
// •
• f';'••/4"•'-
- ;
PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
•,4!'a
RES. #B10/02 - ALGAE BIOMONITORING - REGIONAL WATERSHED MONITORING
PROGRAM
Partnership with the University of Toronto to develop the use of Algae as
a Biomonitoring Tool for the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Authority enter into a two year
agreement with the University of Toronto to develop the use of algae as a biomonitoring
tool to assess the health of the GTA streams as part of the Regional Watershed
Monitoring Network's activities.
AND FURTHER THAT the Authority provide to the University at total of $14,000 over a two
year period to support this work.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In April 2001, the TRCA received municipal endorsement and support for the implementation of
a Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. The intent of this program is to provide the
necessary information to assess the health of watershed ecosystems, provide guidance in
making decisions, guide the formulation of public policy, and promote public awareness. The
data generated by a watershed monitoring network can also be used to track long- and
short-term trends in watershed health, and assist with the implementation of the Toronto
Remedial Action Plan. Complete details of the program are available in the document
Development of a Regional Watershed Monitoring Network and its companion discussion
papers Aquatic Habitat and Species, Terrestrial Natural Heritage, Surface Water Quality, and
Flow and Precipitation Monitoring.
The development of an algal component for the monitoring program was identified in the
Aquatic Habitat and Species monitoring activities and was budgeted for in the initial 5 -year
proposal. To this end, staff wish to assess the condition of periphytic diatoms in the TRCA's
watersheds that relate to stream health, and to calibrate the diatom communities to water
chemistry conditions. To assist this investigation, algae samples have been collected at the
routine stream chemistry sites (approximately 20) as well as at the routine benthic invertebrate
sites (approximately 117) that were monitored in 2001.
RATIONALE
There are several programs throughout the world that have successfully utilized algae and in
particular, diatoms, for biomonitoring. The benefit of using diatoms as biomonitors is the low
cost relative to other traditional methods, as well as the non - destructive collection methods of
diatom sampling. In addition, because of their sensitivity to basic water chemistry and their
short life cycle, algae such as diatoms are amongst the first group of organisms to be impacted
by shifts in physical and chemical conditions in a waterbody, including introduction of
pollutants at relatively low concentrations. Thus diatoms are an important component of an
early warning system of change in a watershed.
26
A pilot project conducted by Dr. Marianne Douglas (Department of Geology, University of
Toronto) and her students for the TRCA in the spring of 2000 examined the use of diatoms as a
biomonitoring tool for environmental assessment and yielded promising results. Based on
these results staff have identified the need to undertake a project to further detail the algae
(diatom) communities in the GTA watersheds, and undertake the calibratation of these
communities relative to water quality conditions.
This partnership and work with the University of Toronto also provides another opportunity to
further develop the monitoring "network" that has been identified under the Regional Watershed
Monitoring Program.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Staff have developed a specific Terms of Reference to direct the project. In follow -up to the
earlier pilot project, Dr. Douglas and a PhD student will conduct a survey of the diatoms found
in the Toronto region's rivers. Using diatom samples and water chemistry data provided by the
TRCA and the City of Toronto, as well as field data collected by the graduate student, a
regional calibration of diatoms will be made. From these data, a biomonitoring model of the
region will be constructed, for future biomonitoring needs.
The specific deliverables /products that have been identified for this project include:
Year 1: Stream Ecosystem Health and Diatom Survey
• Survey of diatom taxa in Toronto streams. Samples to be provided through the monitoring
activities of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Network. Archived samples to also be
made available. Compilation of a diatom species list and a digital database will be initiated.
• Assessment of stream's health, i.e., very healthy to very poor, based on diatom
communities present and using existing diatom indices.
• Fieldwork: in addition to those samples supplied by the TRCA (archived and on- going) as
part of the City of Toronto's routine stream monitoring sites, a more thorough sampling of
one of the TRCA's watersheds will also be carried out by the PhD student. This watershed
will be determined through consultation with the TRCA, but may involve the Humber River
due to its size and diversity. These additional sites will be monitored monthly for diatoms
and basic water chemistry variables, to be analyzed at the University. Site locations will
include some of the existing Aquatic Habitat and Species monitoring stations established
for the invertebrate communities, as well as some of the locations surveyed in the City of
Toronto's routine monthly stream assessment.
Year 2: Calibration and Assessment Calibration
• Regional calibration of periphytic diatoms to relate diatom taxa to environmental variables
(e.g., nutrients, conductivity, salinity, acidity, metals, temp etc) using multivariate statistics.
The City of Toronto's routine monthly water chemistry data will provide the bulk of
information on the water chemistry of the sites.
• Identification of significant environmental variables and metric development.
• Construction of a diatom biomonitoring model for the TRCA's streams.
27
Assessment
• Determine the effectiveness of periphytic diatoms in assessing watershed health. Can they
be used as a surrogate for extensive water chemistry analyses?
• Comparison of diatom - generated data with benthic invertebrate and fish data (data to be
provided by TRCA)
• Cost/benefit analyses of a diatom biomonitoring program vs. benthic invertebrate or fish
analyses
• Discussion of a biomonitoring model using diatoms, invertebrates and fish.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
TRCA agrees to provide support for this project of a total of $14 000 over a two year period ($ 7
000 in year 1 and $ 7 000 in year 2). Additional funding to match the Authority's contibution
(2:1) will be made available by Dr. Douglas's Premier's Research Excellence Award (PREA).
Funding to support this partnership is available through the Regional Watershed Monitoring
Program. Account 124 -15.
Report prepared by: Scott Jarvie, extension 5312
For Information contact: Scott Jarvie, extension 5312
Date: February 13, 2002
RES. #B11/02 -
Moved by:
Seconded by:
SMART GROWTH: STRATEGIC TRANSPORTATION DIRECTIONS
To provide comments on the Provincial Strategic Transportation
Directions document as part of the Smart Growth initiative.
Jim McMaster
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the following comments,
summarized below, and outlined in this report be forwarded to the Ministry of
Transportation to assist them In strengthening the Strategic Transportation Directions
document;
THAT Transportation planning for central Ontario must first focus on optimizing the
existing transportation system before expanding it, by employing transportation demand
management programs and by making real and measurable progress in transit
supportive land use planning;
THAT the Strategic Transportation Directions recommended reflect a systems approach
and be better balanced to include Tess reliance on new highways and increased
emphasis on public transit and other modes of transportation; and
28
AND FURTHER THAT the TRCA continue to provide assistance to the province in refining
the Strategic Transportation Directions and other Smart Growth initiatives for central
Ontario through continued Involvement in stakeholder discussions, and by providing
comments to the province.
BACKGROUND
Smart Growth
The Province of Ontario is preparing a Tong -term strategy for promoting and managing growth
to ensure sustainability, "Ontario Smart Growth ".
The Province has stated that:
"Smart growth is the governments strategy for promoting and managing growth in three ways:
• Sustain a strong economy;
• Build strong communities; and
• Promote a realthy environment."
The development of this strategy began with several round -table discussions throughout the
province, two of which were attended by TRCA staff (May 31, 2001 and June 4, 2001). Since
then, the TRCA has provided comments to the province on several smart growth issues,
including the Principles and Goals of Smart Growth (Executive Meeting #5/01, June 22, 2001),
and the Mandate, Boundaries and Membership of the Smart Growth Panels.
For some time the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) region has recognized the importance of links
between the economy, communities and environment. The Regions of York, Peel and Durham
and the City of Toronto (Crossroads) Official Plans guide further planning on the basis of
striving for these three components which collectively provide for quality of life and long term
sustainability of the region. However, while recognizing the foundation of smart growth, its
implementation and the demonstration of measurable results have been inadequate.
Therefore, strategic steps must focus on how to manage growth within our region. The draft
Strategic Transportation Directions document has been prepared by the Ministry of
Transportation as a means to provide a smart growth approach to transportation planning in
central Ontario.
Central Ontario Smart Growth Panel
On February 11th 2002, the provincial government announced the formation of the central
Ontario Smart Growth Panel. The panel is comprised of 19 appointed members, and includes
representatives from municipal, economic, environment (FON and STORM), development and
community sectors.
The panel will be chaired by Hazel McCallion, Mayor of the City of Mississauga. The panel will
be advisory in nature, defining, planning and recommending strategies for how communities
and the province should plan for successful Tong -term growth. The panel will also work toward
defining a vision for sustainable economic growth, accompanied by strategies to improve the
quailty of life and protection of the environment across central Ontario. The panel will focus on
two main issues in central Ontario, transportation and waste management. Attachment 1
identifies the Central Zone boundaries.
29
Strategic Transportation Directions
In support of the provincial Smart Growth strategy, the Ministry of Transportation (MTO), in
conjunction with the Ontario SuperBuild Corporation, has prepared a draft Strategic
Transportation Directions (STD) document for central Ontario. This document outlines the
transportation vision for central Ontario (including the GTA and links to Peterborough, Barrie,
Kitchener- Waterloo-Cambridge and Niagara Region) and identifies transportation trends,
forecasts and issues.
The STD proposes strategies, studies and activities which may help address transportation
issues in the region and province as a whole. The aim of the central Ontario STD document is
to provide the following:
• Overview of transportation in the region;
• Examines the contribution of different modes of transportation to the regional transportation
system;
• Identify social and economic factors in the region that affect transportation;
• Identify growth patterns and their effect on future transportation needs;
• Identify strategic directions for the development of the provincial transportation system; and
• Set out strategies MTO may pursue in relation to the region's overall transportation network.
ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS
STD: Objectives, Issues and Factors
TRCA staff have reviewed the STD document and attended a workshop held by MTO (February
13, 2002), involving stakeholders in the central Ontario region. Overall, we applaud the
provincial government for developing the STD document and for using extensive research,
smart growth principles and current transportation studies to identify many of the prevailing
transportation issues.
This document recognizes many of the transportation issues prevalent to central Ontario, and
provides numerous goals and objectives toward reaching an improved and balanced
transportation system. Below are some of the objectives of the STD document:
• To develop an integrated transportation system that is safe, efficient, environmentally
sensitive and accessible;
• To support Smart Growth principles related to land use;
• To promote a balanced transportation system that reduces energy consumption and
vehicle emissions;
• To promote choice for travel;
• To reduce gridlock; and
• To develop integrated transportation networks.
30
Section 2 of the document identifies factors that affect transportation needs (e.g. population,
. land use and demographics, and environment) . The STD recognizes that central Ontario is a
growing region. In 2000 the GTA had a population of 5.1 million; by 2031 it is estimated that
there will be 7.4 million people living in the GTA. Additionally, the population of the areas
adjacent to the GTA was 2.4 million in 2000, and is growing at a slightly lower rate than the
GTA (1.5% in GTA and 1.2% in surrounding areas).
This document recognizes the nodal pattern of development in central Ontario, which results in
more people travelling more often. With this in mind, the report advocates a transportation
system that is efficient and one that provides ample opportunity to use various modes of
transportation on an inter - regional basis. Many smart growth programs support the
development of transportation choices and encourage the designation of land uses necessary
to support them. For instance, a dedicated transit fund could support the development of
light -rail and bus rapid transit. Land use designations to accompany this type oftransit
development could be compact, mixed -used development along transit corridors and near
transit stations.
The STD states "The transportaion sector is a leading cause of air pollution and a major
contributor to greenhouse gases and climate change." Given this statement, the document
-indicates a number of provincial initatives that have been launched in order to improve air
quality, for example the implementation of the Drive Clean Program and the creation of a Smog .
Alert Response Plan. The document also identifies that the development and use of low
polluting technologies (e.g. cars that use clean fuel) will become more attractive in the future.
Furthermore, the STD notes that an increased demand for non - roadway alternatives is
anticipated.
Section 3 of the STD document outlines the current transportation system in central Ontario.
This section examines the main modes of transportation (e.g. automobile and truck, transit,
aviation, marine) as well as some of the pressures on the current transporation system such as
congestion on roads and transit and the expansion of highways and transit systems. This
section also identifies the importance of inter - regional transit in central Ontario, and the
services of GO Transit rail and bus, Via Rail and Ontario Northland rail and bus.
'Section 4 of the document builds on both the factors affecting transportation (Section 2) and -
the current transportation system in central Ontario (Section 3) and identifies ways to address
. future transportation needs, as follows:
• Maximizing the capacity of the existing roadway system (including various transportation
demand management (TDM) measures);
• Increasing transit service;
• Adding strategic links to the existing highway system;
• Encouraging transit- supportive land use;
• Improving goods mobility; and
• Maximizing the ability of rail, air and marine services to move people and goods.
31
Strategic Directions
Sections 1 through 4 of the STD document provide an excellent overview of the current
transportation system in central Ontario, the factors that affect transportation, and ways of
addressing future transportation needs. However, when it comes to providing strategic
direction (Section 5), the document is vague and limited in scope, focusing primarilyon
maintenance and expansion of the highway system. Details are provided on highway
expansions, such as Highway 407 East completion to Highway 35/115, Highway 427 extension
to the Bradford area, development of the Niagara Mid - Peninsula Highway and others. In
contrast, the recommendation pertaining to GO Transit indicates that the province will help
develop a 20 to 30 year vision, but provides no additional detail to expansion of transit or
policies addressing complementary land uses.
It is important to note that growing traffic congestion may be the number one issue affecting
the public's interest in smart growth policies. The result is a growing interest in other
transportation options, such as light and heavy rail systems, expanded bus service, and bike
and pedestrian paths, to enhance mobility and improve the quality of life and should be
considered more fully in the strategic directions. Furthermore, it has often been noted that
more roads and highways often leads to increased urban sprawl, leading to a degraded
environment. The official plans of the Regions of York, Peel and Durham and the City of
Toronto (Crossroads) provide good examples of recognizing and integrating several
transportation options, such as personal automobile use, transit, walking and bicycling. The
challenge still remains to turn good policy into implementable action with measurable results.
The document mentions the use of transportation demand management measures as a means
to provide incentives and encourage a change in habit, for example from single person car use
to carpooling or public transit use. The TRCA is also in support of TDM measures, however
this document fails to incorporate TDM measures into the strategic directions portion of the
document. We also note, that although the province is advocating the use of TDM measures
(in this document) previous actions seem to indicate otherwise. For example, graduated tolls
on Highway 407 which serve to encourge off peak use and optimize the existing infrastructure
have been discontinued. From this example it is apparent that more government direction and
control is needed to implement Smart Growth programs if future public /private partnerships are
to be used to finance and operate transportation projects.
The document acknowledges the importance of optimizing the current transportation system,
even stating a goal to maximize the use of existing facilities. To optimize the transportation
system, MTO proposes to include TDM measures, Intelligent Transportation Systems and
expand highways. Although the idea of applying TDM measures is discussed in this
document, the implementation of these strategies is unclear. The document notes that
presently many roadways through the GTA are at capacity during peak periods. The
document then proceeds to outline a plan for highway expansion to combat busy roadways. It
is well know that building and expanding roads does not ease congestion, but rather may
increase the volume of traffic and thus maintain or increase the level of congestion.
32
To provide a well balanced and integrated transportation system, the province must apply
many of the measures that have been suggested in the STD and focus on providing choice of
transportation mode. It is necessary for the province to provide incentives for changes to land
use and life style choices. As recognized in the STD document, a well coordinated
transportation system must provide opportunities for efficient and affordable transportation
options, while providing land use choices that will support several types of transportation. This
document needs to do more than just advocate and provide for a comprehensive transit
system with mixed -use areas along transit corridors and stations to compliment the existing
• highway system. The province needs to provide leadership with specific programs and
incentives to make the recommended strategic directions into reality.
The STD does not clearly support the objectives of smart growth as set out by the province. As
well, the strategic direction of this document does not, at all times, mesh well with other
provincial initiatives and policies. For instance, the government is aiming to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and also to preserve agricultural lands. In support of these
provincial initiatives and policies, Conservation Ontario has recognized enhanced public
transportation to ease gridlock, congestion, air pollution, degradation of open space and
agricultural lands as a required component to ensure smart growth (Conservation Ontario
Position Paper Smart Growth October 2, 2001). Improving and expanding the transit system,
as well as encouraging brownfield development and mixed -use development would appear to
be the best options to providing more efficient transportation in central Ontario and also
compliment the additional provincial goals.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the TRCA supports the Smart Growth concept in that it has the potential to
support the TRCA programs in providing for a sustainable future.
With respect to the province's Strategic Transportation Directions for central Ontario, the TRCA
supports a balanced, systems approach to transportation planning that integrates and
promotes many modes of transportation including transit, automobile and truck use, aviation,
marine, bicycling and walking. The TRCA encourages the province to take the lead in
planning and implementing a truly integrated transportation system that will improve the quality
of life and provide for long -term sustainability of the region.
Report Prepared by: Alena Grunwald, extension 5268
Date: February 26, 2002
Attachments: 1
33
Attachment 1
Central Zone Smart Growth Panel boundaries
Smart Growth central zone
34
RES. #812/01 - EMPLOYEE CODE OF CONDUCT
Revised Code of Conduct Personnel Policy.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Michael Di Biase
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the attached revised Employee
Code of Conduct be approved.
CARRIED
RATIONALE
The Employee Code of Conduct is being revised to better reflect the policies of our municipal
partn'e'rs and to maintain not only a common standard in behaviour but a process for an
employee to declare a conflict of interest, and to investigate any employee related conduct
issues. This is a consolidation of both formal and informal policies on a wide range of
employee conduct issues.
For Information contact: Catherine MacEwen, extension 5219
Date: February 28, 2002
;Attachments: 1
35
Attachment 1
Employee Code of Conduct
1.0 Introduction
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and its employees embrace the highest
standards in integrity and ethical conduct with a commitment to a compassionate and caring
working environment. This policy is a re- affirmation of that commitment to an ethical workplace
through the consolidation of previous written and unwritten guidelines for all employees.
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Code of Conduct is a commitment to
ourselves, a condition of employment and part of our fundamental culture. All employees must
read, understand and comply with this policy. Any issues or concerns about the code of
conduct that an employee might have should be discussed immediately with their immediate
supervisor, the HR manager or the Chief Administrative Officer.
The Code of Conduct must be reviewed at least on an annual basis with each employee and
their immediate supervisor. As conditions and situations change, the Code of Conduct may be
modified to reflect the new policies and procedures.
The Code of Conduct is our employees' commitment to creating a positive, respectful and
productive working environment. What we expect from our employees must be viewed from
four essential perspectives.
A. Supporting and actualizing the TRCA Mission.
B. Building on the strengths of our past.
C. Respecting and furthering the relationships with people and organizations.
D. Meeting and exceeding commonly understood standards in employment, some that
are defined in law, some that are defined in our culture.
1.1 Supporting and Actualizing the TRCA Mission
Our fundamental behaviour is defined, motivated and rewarded by our support of our Mission.
"The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is a partnership organization committed to
protecting, restoring and celebrating the natural environment in the Toronto Region through the
development and application of watershed plans, innovative environmental science and
education programs."
36
1.2 Building on the Strengths of Our Past
Our strengths as an organization both energize and direct us. These strengths are:
• A unique watershed and natural heritage management framework designed for our
city and countryside.
• Effective products that meet the needs of the many communities we serve.
• Innovative applied environmental science.
• Leadership and creativity.
• Professional, experienced and dedicated staff.
• Broad partnerships with our stakeholders.
• A commitment to continuous learning.
Our values define our inspirations. These values are:
• Excellence in program and service delivery.
• A commitment to broad community relationship building and partnership
development.
• Relevancy to our stakeholders.
• Measurable business planning targets.
• Accountability to our supporters through benchmarking and reporting.
• Appreciation and recognition of our volunteers, partners and stakeholders.
• Equitable and supportive employee relations.
We believe the performance of our employees depends on the best utilization of our resources,
our lands, our properties, our knowledge and our technology. To be successful, we will build
on our strengths of leadership, creativity, environmental knowledge and our holistic view of
watershed management. We will do this in a corporate culture of mutual respect, an
appreciation of diversity of background and opinion, a commitment to public service and a
yearning for knowledge fed by continuous learning. Our success is based on the success of
our partners and our understanding of their issues and our commitment to sustaining
relationships
1.3 Respecting and Furthering all our Relationships
At Toronto and Region Conservation, we pride ourselves in our reputation and integrity with
employees, our municipal, provincial and federal government contacts, our suppliers, our
clients, our communities, and our environment. To understand the extent of our commitment
to these relationships, each are defined below.
Our Employees
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority believes in and actively demonstrates our
commitment to equality of opportunity for employment, development and advancement of its
employees. The Authority is committed to maintaining a safe, secure and nurturing working
environment for its employees.
37
Central to this commitment to a positive working environment, the Authority provides to all its
employees, many opportunities to communicate areas of concern and open, honest dialogue
among various levels of management.
The TRCA expects that its employees will be conscious of the TRCA's public duty, as well as
their own, and conduct themselves with the same high degree of conduct on and off the job.
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority seeks both to encourage all employees to
realize their potential and supports the development and training of skills to meet the future
needs of the TRCA. All our relationships will be compliant with the safety standards of the
Occupational Health and Safety Act, the respectful standards of the Human Rights Code and
the Privacy Act.
Our Municipal, Provincial and Federal Government Stakeholders
The TRCA is committed to the enhancement of the investment given to us by our Government
partners through effective and efficient use of resources and maintaining the highest
adherence to our Code of Conduct.
Our Suppliers
The TRCA is committed to working with its vendors and suppliers in a fair and equitable way.
The purchase policy is that all equipment, supplies and services are selected based on merit
and that all suppliers will be treated with respect and integrity.
Our Clients
Every customer or client should expect to receive from the TRCA, courteous, prompt, equitable
and efficient service.
Our Communities
The TRCA is committed to being an active and engaged member of the communities that we
serve. Our employees will be encouraged to participate in community activities and seek the
opinions of community members for the programs and projects that we introduce. We will
strive to integrate our own strategic plans with the objectives and goals of the communities that
we serve.
Our Environment
Our Objectives for the Environment are:
The nine watersheds within Toronto and Region are home to over 3 million people (1/3
of Ontario's population). It is within this jurisdiction that TRCA's "Living City Region"
vision will deliver watershed protection programs to achieve:
Healthy Rivers and Shorelines
• safe, clean, vibrant rivers and shorelines within nine watersheds of the region.
38
Regional Biodiversity and Greenspace
• a rich variety of plants and animals that thrive in a network of greenspace.
Sustainable' Living through Education
• people engaging environmentally friendly practices.
2.0 The Code of Conduct - Policy Statements
Our Code of Conduct Policies are statements of our commitment as employees, to the TRCA.
Some of these statements represent our general goals and aspirations to which we share a
commitment, and which should direct all our activity; some are specific commitments to avoid
negative conduct.
2.1 The Commitment to Communications
Definitions
All communications that including presentations, verbal or written reports, opinions, or
discussions, telephone calls, voicemail, e-mail and other forms of communications is covered
by this policy.
The Policy
Communications are the key component to creating a positive corporate culture of respect
and high morale within a nurturing climate. The TRCA is committed to effective
communications with our partners. The TRCA will seek the opinions of our stakeholders on our
objectives and goals throughout our business planning and implementation process. The
TRCA will communicate regularly with our partners through general meetings, individual
presentations and other documentation including annual reports, business plans, grant
applications and specialized or ad hoc variance and monitoring reports as well as day to day
interactions using e-mail, regular mail, telephone and voicemail.
Senior management is committed to ensuring that effective, regular and frequent
communications occur throughout our team, at all levels and for the benefit of all employees. It
is senior management's particular goal to ensure that supervisory.staff are well informed of all
TRCA issues and concerns and can act as the primary source of information to all employees.
Teamwork is a key component of our culture but employees must be empowered with
knowledge and free to express their opinions for us to be truly successful. That is the
communications commitment.
39
2.2 The Commitment to Excellence and Quality
The Definition
Excellence and Quality are defined as the characteristics of not what we do, but how we do it.
The commitment to excellence and quality covers all aspects of day to day working life
including our processes, our products and our relationships with our clients, our partners and
ourselves.
The Policy
All our activities, processes and outcomes must have the following attributes.
Excellence and quality is defined by the following behaviour:
• We will continuously seek better and more effective solutions.
• We will take pride in what we do and how we do it.
• We will nurture ourselves and those we work with to create a caring, fulfilling
atmosphere.
• We will recognize our successes, appreciate our past and seek a better future
through action.
• We will seek out the best in science and environmental practices, not only comply
with environmentally friendly practices but to lead the community in adopting them.
2.3 The Commitment to Accuracy In Reporting Accounting Principles and Practices
Definitions
All accounting and finance information contained in records, reports, ledgers and databases,
including transactions with clients and suppliers, time sheets and payroll information, expense
statements, loans, banking information, grant and levy information and any other financial
statements concerning TRCA are covered by this policy.
The Policy
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's accounting financial records shall be
maintained with the utmost integrity, reflecting accurately and punctually all transactions,
assets and liabilities of the TRCA, following generally accepted accounting principles. All
business records, including expense accounts, invoices, vouchers, bills, payroll and employee
records and other reports shall be prepared with care and honesty and fully disclosed. False
or misleading entries in the books and records of the TRCA or any unrecorded bank accounts
are strictly prohibited. No secret or unrecorded cash funds or other assets will be established
or maintained for any purpose. No transaction is to be concealed from management or the
TRCA's internal or external auditors or the Board. Satisfactory accounting and auditing
procedures and controls must be maintained and full compliance with statutory requirements.
40
2.4 The Commitment to Accurate Travel and Related Expenses
Definition
Travel and related expenses includes all transactions, bills and expenses incurred by an
employee in the course of work. Such expenses include, when authorized by their immediate
supervisor or manager, the employee's attendance at conferences, meetings, courses of
instruction and trips of a similar nature, will be entitled to reimbursement (see Employment
Practices - Travel Expenses Policy in the Personnel Manual for details).
The Policy
Travel expenses will be consistent with the needs of business. Compensation or
reimbursement is for actual and approved expenses incurred on TRCA business only.
Supervisors who aoprove travel and related business expenses reports are responsible for the
appropriateness o- the business related expense and related expense reports. Employees are
responsible for the propriety and reasonableness of expenditures, for ensuring that expense
reports are submitted promptly, and that receipts and explanations properly support reported
expenses.
See the Personnel Manual for more details on appropriate, eligible travel and related expenses.
2.5 The Commitment to Confidential Information and Intellectual Property
Definitions
Confidential or non public information on processes, patents, research, history, specialized
information, market or client information, project implementation information or expert opinion
given in confidence to others or information that could influence the outcome of a decision
either internal to TRCA or externally with our partners and with a reasonable expectation of
confidentiality will be considered intellectual and other property.
This definition also includes TRCA's property and assets which can include internal decisions,
software, hardware, lands, physical assets, buildings, good will amongst our partners and
special interest groups, as well as formal and informal agreements, relationships and
partnerships.
The Policy
It is every employee's responsibility to ensure that all information they communicate is as
accurate and timely as possible whether it be a report, a memo or a verbal update. No
employee shall wilfully mislead other employees, members of the Authority or the public about
any issue of corporate concern. Only with proper authority can any information be released to
anyone outside of the employ of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Any
confidential information must be handled with the utmost of care in and outside of the
organization and cannot be disclosed without the proper approvals and must be used in the
appropriate course of an employee's duties in the TRCA.
41
Any information which is personal information, third party information, confidential information
or information that is not available to the public generally must not be used or disclosed,
except in accordance with Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
Employees shall not make use of any property of TRCA for their personal benefit, gain or
enjoyment, other than property specifically provided by TRCA for such use as a benefit of
employment. Employees shall only use TRCA property, equipment, supplies and services for
activities associated with the discharge of their duties, unless Management Committee
authorization has been granted.
No employee shall sell, transfer publish, disclose, display or otherwise make available
computer programs, software programs, technological innovations, or other intangible
property or rights owned or used by TRCA either while in the employ of TRCA or thereafter.
All property of TRCA and any printed or computer records prepared by an employee in the
course of their employment with TRCA will remain the exclusive property of TRCA (forms, day
calendars etc.
Upon termination of employment, employees will turn in to their supervisor all correspondence,
drawings, maps, documents and all other property belonging to TRCA which may be in the
employee's possession or under his or her control. This includes property made or prepared
by the employee and relating in any way to the affairs of TRCA.
All inventions, products, processes and ideas that the employee developed in the course of
their employment with TRCA will be turned over TRCA.
2.6 The Commitment to Personal Integrity - Gifts and Entertainment
Definitions
Gifts and entertainment are defined as favours or gifts given by external business sources
given to employees of TRCA during the course of regular business.
The Policy
Employees are expected to take action and make decisions based on an impartial and
objective assessment of each situation, free from the influence of gifts and favours. The TRCA
must avoid both the fact and the appearance of impropriety with the organizations or
individuals with whom it deals. Choices in suppliers must be based on competitive, external
factors such as price, quality, availability, and service.
Employees shall not seek or accept any gifts, entertainment, payments, fees, services, valuable
privileges or other favours from any person or business organization that has any dealings with
the TRCA, except as provided below:
42
1. An employee may accept entertainment usually associated with accepted business
practices if, eg.:
• it is infrequent
• it serves a business purpose
• it is appropriate for the business responsibilities of the individuals involved.
• It is not excessive or lavish.
2. Employees should not give or receive gifts with more than a $25 value without reporting the
gift or favour to their immediate supervisor.
3. It is never acceptable or permissible to receive cash or cash equivalent of any amount
(including stock or other marketable securities).
Gifts, favours and entertainment may be given to others at the TRCA expense only if they are
consistent with accepted business practice, such as providing vendors with a better
understanding of the TRCA operations.
2.7 Commitment to Personal Integrity - Outside Business Activities
Definitions
Outside Business Activities includes investment in or participation with or employment with an
external organization to TRCA.
The Policy
Employees may not participate in outside business or financial activities that compete with
services offered by TRCA. Employees may participate in business activities outside of TRCA
business hours that does not compete with TRCA activities but all such arrangements need to
be disclosed and approved in advance by the employee's immediate supervisor. This is due
to the potential for conflict of interest and that conflict could impair the employee's ability to
carry out their regular duties. If such a conflict exists, the employee may be asked to transfer
to a new position or to choose between continued employment at TRCA and the outside
activity.
Employees participating in an outside business will not use TRCA time, resources or property
for the benefit of that business. Proprietary or confidential information or data acquired through
TRCA employment may not be used or disclosed in any employee's external activity. Outside
employment that results in a breach of trust can and will lead to immediate dismissal or other
'disciplinary action.
Responsibility to avoid conflicts of interest, or the perception of conflicts of interest arising from
outside activities is the sole accountability of the employee and any possible situation should
be discussed with the employee's immediate supervisor. It is expected that the employee will
act in the best interest of TRCA at all times.
43
2.8 Commitment to Personal Integrity - Employee Political Activity
Definitions
Where an employee actively and visibly supports a particular political party, a special interest
group or community activity espousing a belief or ideology where the activity could be
considered an act of political influence on others in the community.
The Policy
Employees shall not engage in political activity (at all levels of government: municipal,
regional, provincial, federal) or other special interest group activities of a political nature, during
working hours or use TRCA resources (people, property or assets). Those employees who are
elected officials should arrange appropriate time off for their political commitments.
2.9 The Commitment to Personal Integrity Solicitation of TRCA Employees
Definitions
Where employees distribute, influence or engage other employees in non work related
activities including family, special interest groups, religious or social communities, activist or
issue related groups, will be considered solicitation of TRCA employees.
The Policy
Any solicitation of employees or distribution of non work related materials of any kind to
employees on TRCA premises or during working hours, will require the prior approval of
Management Committee.
2.10 The Commitment to Personal Integrity - Personal Use of the Internet/
Telecommunication
Definitions
Where employees access and /or utilize during TRCA working hours, the Internet, their
voicemail or other communications devices including telephones, pcd /palm pilot or other
devices for their personal use.
The Policy
Employees will be permitted reasonable use of the Internet from TRCA terminals, however its
use must not be abused. The use of the Internet will be much like the use of TRCA telephones
for personal use. First, it must be reasonable, infrequent and for very short periods of time e.g.
a few minutes at lunch. Personal use must not incur additional costs to the TRCA without
previous authorization by the employee's immediate supervisor.
44
The use of the TRCA Internet or e mail system for the access, printing or distribution of any '
pornographic materials, materials that would infringe the Harassment policy, materials for
personal gain or avoidance of economic loss and /or for distribution of non TRCA materials to
individuals in or outside of TRCA (like chain letters etc. is strictly prohibited and
non - compliance can result in immediate dismissal or other disciplinary processes.
2.11 The Commitment to Abide by the Law
Definitions
All federal, provincial, municipal and regional laws and statutes including the Highway Traffic
Act, the Occupational Health and Safety Act, The Human Rights Code etc.
The Policy
No employee shall at any time take any action which he or she knows or reasonably should
know, violates any applicable law or regulation in the course of his /her work at the TRCA.
All policies must be compliant with the legislation and regulations to which we are subject.
Ignorance of the law is not a valid defense. If an employee has any questions about the
application of a particular law or regulation, they should consult with their immediate supervisor
or seek the opinion of others on their immediate management team. The Directors or HR
Manager or CAO will seek external TRCA legal counsel if the application of a particular law
requires greater clarification.
It should be noted that in any circumstance where there appears to be a situation with legal or
insurance claim implications, each employee should advise his /her immediate supervisor as
early in the process as possible. This is particularly important where there is a chance of
litigation �r prosecution of the TRCA or of its employees.
2.12 Commitment to Honesty
Definitions
Honesty refers to truthfulness, sincerity and morality. Dishonesty overs a range of behaviour
that may include:
• Fraud
• Breach of Trust
• False or misleading statements ,
• Theft of cash or property of the employer
• Falsified time sheets, personal expense statements
• Embezzlement, illegal commissions or kickbacks
• Misuse of TRCA funds or resources including use of a TRCA credit cards for personal use.
45
The Policy
Dishonesty in any form is prohibited. All employees of the TRCA are required to conduct
themselves honestly, and are responsible for immediately reporting any suspected cases of
fraud, breach of trust and other forms of wrongdoing to their immediate supervisors or more
senior management up to the CAO. For any situation of suspected fraud, the HR Manager
should be informed so that an investigation can begin immediately. Appropriate protection of
the confidentiality of such information will be observed. For suspected wrongdoing involving a
Director, the CAO should be informed, for suspected wrongdoing involving the CAO, the Chair
should be informed.
Prior to taking any action on suspicion of wrongdoing, management should seek the advice of
the HR Manager, their Director and Chief Administrative Officer and where appropriate, the
Enforcement officer responsible for security. All discussions must be treated with the utmost of
confidentiality to protect the rights of the person under suspicion and assist in preventing
further losses or damages to the TRCA and its employees. All suspected wrongdoing will be
investigated fully and all persons accused or suspected of wrongdoing will be treated fairly. All
employees are required to co-operate fully with law enforcement and regulatory officials.
The results of the investigation will be presented to the CAO and where wrongdoing has been
discovered, a plan of action will be undertaken. In all cases, the policies and procedures of
that department will be reviewed and recommendations will be made to the Director to reduce
the risk of wrongdoing in the future.
Retaliation against informants or witnesses involved in the investigation of wrongdoing is
forbidden.
All wrongdoing which involves misappropriation of money or property must be reported to the
Director Finance and Business Development as soon as possible to permit the processing of
any resultant insurance claim.
2.13 The Commitment to Avoiding Conflict of Interest
Definitions
A conflict of interest occurs when, in the course of his or her duties, an employee is called upon
to deal with any matter in which he or she has a direct or indirect personal interest, whether or
not the employee acts or intends to act in a way which is inconsistent with the interests of the
TRCA.
A direct personal interest is an interest through which the employee may derive an economic
benefit or avoid an economic loss.
An indirect personal interest arises where the potential economic benefit, or avoidance of
economic Toss, would be experienced by another person or corporation having a financial
relationship with the employee. This may include, but not be limited to, ownership of shares or
other securities, or the loan of money or property by or to the employee. An indirect personal
46
interest also occurs when the potential benefit or avoidance of Toss, would be experienced by a
person who is a relative or spouse of the employee, or based upon the facts of the particular
case, the employee could reasonably be considered to have a personal interest in the
economic well -being of that other person.
The Policy
A personal interest in common with all or a substantial portion of the residents of the Region of
Peel, Region of York, Region of Durham or the City of Toronto, Township of Adjala/Tosorontio
and the Town of Mono by virtue of residency in the area, or a personal interest in common with
all or a substantial portion of employees by reason of the terms and conditions of employment,
will be not considered to create a conflict of interest.
If a conflict of interest situation arises, an employee has two immediate responsibilities:
Each employee shall make prompt and full disclosure in accordance with these
policies; and
The employee shall not participate in the formulation of any recommendation or
decision relating to the matter.
The employee shall make prompt and full disclosure for the conflict situation in writing to the
employee's Director and immediate supervisor, including a description of the conflict of
interest, the identity of any persons or corporation or special interest group involved in the
conflict of interest and whether it is a direct or indirect personal interest for the employee. Also
needed is a description of the employee's responsibilities that would involve the employee in
the conflict situation, in order that a strategy for avoiding the conflict can be implemented.
Upon receiving the disclosure of conflict of interest, the employee's Director and /or CAO in '
conjunction with the employee's immediate supervisor, will take immediate steps to ensure that
the employee is not required to deal with any aspect of the matter giving rise to the conflict of
interest.
In the event that a member of the Senior Management of the TRCA determines that he or she is
in a conflict of interest situation, the required disclosure shall be made immediately in writing to
the CAO and in the case of the CAO, the disclosure will be made to the Executive Committee of
the Authority.
An employee who is in a conflict situation must not participate in any recommendations or
decision, or in any way attempt to influence others who have the responsibility for making such
recommendations or decisions. This includes recommendations to the employee's supervisor,
to Management Committee or to the Authority.
No employee • should be disciplined or treated adversely for making prompt and full disclosure
of the circumstances.
47
2.14 Commitment to Avoiding Drugs and Alcohol Use
Definition
An employee under the influence of alcohol and or drugs during working hours. If an
employee is being treated for alcoholism or other substance abuse but does not take their
medication, then there is evidence of wilful misconduct.
Policies
The illegal use, sale, purchase, transfer or possession of any restricted or controlled drug,
narcotic or any other illegal substance while on TRCA premises or during working hours is
strictly prohibited and will result in immediate dismissal or other disciplinary action.
TRCA prohibits the use, sale, purchase, transfer or possession of opened alcoholic beverages
by employees while on TRCA premises or during working hours except as authorized by
TRCA.
It is never permissible for employees to attend to their responsibilities and duties under the
influence of alcohol or under the influence of any illegal drug.
2.15 Commitment not to engage in Harassment
Definitions
TRCA will make every effort to provide all employees with a work environment that is free from
any form of discrimination or harassment and will promote one that respects the dignity, self
worth, and human rights of every individual.
Harassment may be related to race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship,
creed, sex, sexual orientation, age, record of offenses, marital status, family status or disability.
Harassment is a misconduct that can include but not be limited to , unsolicited remarks made
deliberately or repeatedly, physical assault, leering or gestures, questions, suggestions, or
decisions based on prohibited grounds or discrimination. (See the Employment Practices -
Harassment in the Personnel Manual for further details).
Policies
Every employee of the Authority is entitled to work in an environment that is free from
discrimination and /or harassment.
Every employee of the Authority shall deal with their fellow employees in a fair and, equitable
manner free from discrimination and /or harassment.
48
Every complaint of harassment will be treated as a serious matter and harassment will not be
tolerated. A full and fair investigation will be conducted where a complaint is made and
appropriate action taken.
3.0 Breaking the Employment Relationship - Rules of Dismissal or Disciplinary Action
An employee who does not comply with the policies contained in this Code of Conduct will be
subject to disciplinary action involving a range of sanctions, including, potentially, termination
without notice or severance. These employment commitments are fundamental expectations
of TRCA employees.
Employees may also be disciplined or dismissed for general breaches of the employment
relationship which derive from the Code of Conduct, and may include the following.
3.1 Misconduct
This includes dishonesty, discreditable conduct, breaches of law and TRCA policies, including
the Code of Conduct, disrespect or harassment of other employees, breaches of trust or
conflict of interest and recklessness, where an employee endangers TRCA employees,
volunteers, clients, guests or TRCA property.
3.2 Wilful Neglect of Duty
This is where the employee not only fails to meet their commitment to excellence and quality,
but refuses to report to work or take instructions, or perform the requirements of their job, or
abandons work early without notice and permission, or is persistently and willfully tardy.
3.3 Disobedience
This is where the employee refuses to perform a direct and reasonable order or to respect the
authority of his superiors. This misconduct does not include a direct order where the
employee reasonably perceives that the task is unsafe to unlawful.
All employees and TRCA agents /consultants or contracted staff are expected to comply with
the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Code of Conduct. Employees are to seek
clarification from their immediate supervisors about particular situations and the Code of
Conduct should be reviewed frequently between an employee and their immediate supervisor.
Failure to comply with the Code of Conduct will result in immediate dismissal or other
disciplinary action.
4.0 The Code of Conduct Process
The Responsibilities of the Immediate Supervisor
49
The immediate supervisor should review the TRCA Code of Conduct with every employee who
reports to them, at least once a year. Upon completion of the review, both the employee and
their supervisor will sign a form indicating the employee's understanding of the Code of
Conduct (see attachment one) and if necessary, disclosure of any situations that could or have
led to a conflict or interest or breach of trust condition.
In situations where the potential conflict or breach of trust is sufficient to impair the employee's
ability to perform their regularly assigned duties, the immediate supervisor must inform their
Director or CAO immediately to determine the next course of action.
The Responsibilities of the Employee
The employee is responsible for reading, understanding and complying with the TRCA Code of
Conduct. The employee is also responsible for seeking, clarification of any
misunderstandings and for promptly identifying to their immediate supervisor any potential or
real concerns about conflict of interest situations. This prompt disclosure of potential conflict of
interest is a fundamental element of the employment relationship between TRCA and the
employee. Failure to disclose promptly could lead to immediate dismissal or other disciplinary
processes.
It is also the responsibility of all employees to identify to their immediate supervisor or Director,
any possible situation that they know of or have observed where a conflict of interest has
occurred with another employee. In these situations, the supervisor will advise their Director of
the potential conflict or breach of trust and an investigative process will be initiated.
4.1 The Conflict of Interest Disclosure Process
1. A description of the situation including the employee's duties and how the conflict of
interest could manifest itself.
2. A list of the possible people involved and the relationship with the employee in the situation
described above. This should /could include family members, friends, business contacts or
other related people.
3. A description of the actions that the employee has taken to resolve the situation or any
recommendations that the employee has to resolve the situation. For example, the
employee has withdrawn from or transferred a particular case or situation to another
employee to resolve.
4. The employee's signature, the date of disclosure and the supervisor's signature.
5. The immediate supervisor discusses the disclosure with his /her Director and a decision is
made on the next course of action including tabling the disclosure with the CAO.
50
6. In the case of the TRCA Directors, the disclosure will be made to the CAO. In the case of
the CAO, the disclosure will be made to the Executive Committee of the Authority, using
the same format and process at least once a year or where required by the situation.
4.2 The Investigative Process
This process will be followed for any situation where there suggestion of non compliance with
the TRCA Code of Conduct.
1. The Situational Analysis
The HR Manager will interview all of the parties including the complainant, the person under
investigation and other related witnesses. The immediate manager of the complainant or
employee under investigation may be asked to attend the interview. The interviews are private
but employees will be aware that their statements must be true and may be used in a legal
proceedings. Email, voice mails and notes will also be considered if the author can be
reasonably identified.
2. The Interviews
The interviews will be conducted in a private area. Employees and witnesses, including the
complainant will be asked to describe the situation, the people involved, and the observed
impacts and to identify any witnesses to the same or similar situation.
3. The Report
The HR Manager will compile a report of findings and a separate sheet of recommendations.
The recommendations would include a general statement of findings and an action plan for the
employee and management team.
4. The Recommendations
The recommendations will be reviewed by the manager, the employee and the HR Manager to
define the action plan, the timing and the individuals involved and after management
concurrence is obtained, the Plan of Action will be signed and implemented.
5. Counsel
Any party may have counsel present during their interview with the prior agreement of other
participants. If either the employee or witness wish(es) to pursue legal action, TRCA reserves
the right to have counsel present.
6. The CAO
In the case of potential non compliance of the CAO with TRCA's Code of Conduct, the HR
Manager will inform the Chair of the Authority to arrange an outside third party process by
followed.
51
Course of Action
The course of action may vary depending on the circumstances. In many cases, a simple
discussion between the two or more employees involved can resolve a misunderstanding.
For more complex and serious issues the following are potential courses of action....
• Training in human rights or other employment related laws.
• Discussion of TRCA policies to ensure consistent application of those policies.
• A change in assignment for the employee(s) involved.
• Disciplinary acts such as suspensions or if necessary, terminations with cause.
• Follow up sessions with individuals to monitor future compliance.
• Effective Communications, diversity training, management courses, conflict
resolution, team building or other specific initiatives to assist the employee and the
management team to move beyond the source of conflict.
The Documentation
The recommendations will be shared with the primary people involved in the situation. The
recommendations will include
• The finding of no evidence or the finding of evidence of an employment related
issue.
• The course of action.
• A letter to the employee on employment status, signed by the employee's
immediate supervisor or the CAO.
The individual against whom a complaint is made of wrongdoing will receive a copy of all
documentation for their own use and one copy will be placed in their TRCA personnel files. All
documentation will be sealed with access restricted to the HR Manager, the Director, the CAO
or TRCA legal counsel. In the case of a future incident, this information may be used in the
second investigation.
5.0 The Appeal Process
Any employee who believes that their interests or opinions were not adequately represented in
the Employee Disclosure documentation or process and /or the Investigative Process, niay
appeal directly to the CAO for reconsideration. In the case of the employees who are Senior
Management (Directors) the appeal should be made to the CAO. In the case of the CAO, the
appeal will be made to the Executive Committee of the Authority.
Any appeal can be initiated by an employee by simply sending a letter to the Executive
Assistant to the CAO. The Executive Assistant to the CAO will make arrangements to have the
employee submit a meeting item as a submission of appeal.
52
Attachments
Form One - The Code of Conduct Agreement Form
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Code of Conduct Review Form
I, the undersigned have reviewed, understood and agree to comply with the TRCA policies in
the Code of Conduct listed therein. I am aware that I am required to identify any actual or
potential conflict of interest to my immediate supervisor and to my Director as soon as I
become aware of the conflict situation. As CAO, I will review this information with the Executive
Committee, annually.
Year Signature of Employee Signature of Supervisor Date of Employee
Signature .
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
This form should be completed every 12 months and retained in the employee's personnel file.
It is the responsibility of the supervisor to ensure that this process is completed each year.
53
Form Two- The TRCA Employee Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form
This form is to be completed by the employee and submitted to their immediate supervisor and
their Director. All information must be up to date, truthful and accurate to the best ability of the
employee. It is both the employee's and the supervisor's responsibility to develop and
implement the recommendations that arise out of this disclosure. All information will be treated
as private and confidential unless part of an investigative process.
Employee's Name
Today's Date
Please describe in your own words what is the situation(s) that you consider a real or potential
conflict of interest.
Please identify all the individuals outside and inside of the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority that are related in some way to this situation. Please identify their names, their
relationship with you and the situation described.
54
Please indicate what actions you have taken (if any) to resolve this potential or real conflict of
interest. In addition, please indicate what recommendations you want to make to resolve this
situation to everyone's satisfaction.
Actions taken to date.
Recommendations for the future.
Signature of Employee Date of Signature
Signature of Supervisor Date of Signature
The information contained in this document is highly private and confidential. Copies should
be filed in a sealed envelope in the employee's personnel file and with the employee
themselves. Access to this information is restricted to the employee, the employee's
immediate supervisor, the employee's Director and the CAO and the HR manager. The CAO
declaration is restricted to members of the Executive Committee of the Authority.
55
RES.#B13/02 - HYDRO ONE BRAMPTON NETWORKS INC.
Request for a permanent easement for an existing duct structure and a
proposed duct structure and manhole, located on the east side of
Goreway Drive, north of Highway #7, City of Brampton, Humber River
Watershed, CFN 32925. Receipt of a request from Hydro One Brampton
Networks Inc. to provide a permanent easement for an existing duct
structure and a proposed duct structure and manhole located on the
east side of Goreway Drive, north of Highway #7.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is In receipt of a request from Hydro One Brampton Networks Inc.
to provide a permanent easement for an existing duct structure and a proposed duct
structure and manhole located on the east side of Goreway Drive, north of Highway #7,
City of Brampton;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the
Authority in furthering Its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to cooperate with Hydro One Brampton Networks Inc. In this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.06 hectares, more or less, (0.15 acres) be
granted to Hydro One Brampton Networks Inc. for an existing duct structure and a
proposed duct structure and manhole, said land being Part of Lot 8, Concession 8,
Northern Division, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel;
THAT consideration 1s to be approximately $6,000 (this figure Is to be adjusted based on
the actual area on the final survey), plus all legal, survey and other costs;
THAT archaeological investigation is to be conducted before any site disturbance with
any mitigative measures required being carried out all at the expense of Hydro One
Brampton Networks Inc.;
THAT Hydro One Brampton Networks Inc. is to fully indemnify and save harmless the
Authority from any and all claims for injuries, damages or Toss of any nature resulting in
any way either directly or indirectly from the granting of this easement or the carrying out
of construction;
THAT said conveyance is subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials are authorized and directed to
take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, Including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
56
BACKGROUND
In 1997 TRCA granted an easement to the Brampton Hydro - Electric Commission (now Hydro
One Brampton Networks Inc.) for the construction of a duct structure on the west side of
Goreway Drive. This duct structure connected to the transformer station located on the east
side of Goreway Drive which was owned by Ontario Hydro at that time. The Brampton
Hydro-Electric Commission mistakenly thought that Ontario Hydro owned the strip of land in
front of the transformer station and installed their duct structure on this property. Recently
Hydro One Brampton Networks Inc. approached TRCA for a permit under Ontario Regulation
158 to install an additional duct structure and manhole at this location. At that time Hydro One
Brampton Networks Inc. was advised that the property is owned by TRCA. Hydro One
Brampton Networks Inc. is now requesting that TRCA grant an easement to formalize the
existing duct structure as well as grant an easement for the proposed new works.
The subject lands were acquired from the Estate of J. T. Hodgson on December 17, 1965
under the Ebenezer Dam and Reservoir project.
A plan illustrating this location is attached.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Hydro One Brampton Networks Inc. will pay compensation in the amount of $40,000 per acre
based on the final area of the easement as determined by a survey. Hydro One Brampton
Networks Inc. has agreed to pay all survey, legal, archaeological, and restoration costs
associated with the granting of this easement and the carrying out of construction.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, Extension 5245
Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: February 27, 2002
Attachments: 1
57
Attachment 1
HYDRO ONE BRAMPTON NETWORKS INC.
Request for a permanent easement for an existing duct structure and
a proposed duct structure and manhole, located on the east side of
Goreway Drive, north of Highway #7, City of Brampton
Humber River Watershed
+TiLS ry.a irTg
TRCA LANDS
PROPOSED EASEMENT,
58
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES. #B14 /02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Jim McMaster
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.1 - 8.1.14, and 8.1.18 - 8.1.20, with the exception of 8.1.6 - City of Toronto), which are
listed below.
RES. #B15 /02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
8.1.6 - City of Toronto
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Jim McMaster
CARRIED
THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application
8.1.6 - City of Toronto, which is listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
8.1.1 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on (Block "I ", Plan M -276, Part
Lots 12/13, Concession 4 E.H.S., adjacent to 7405 Tranmere Drive, west of
Bramalea Road, north of Derry Road), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Mississauga.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area and to alter a watercourse to
facilitate construction of erosion protection works.
59
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Index Sheet and Sheets 1, and 3 of 3; dated January 14, 2002; received February 12,
2002; prepared by Philips Engineering.
• Sheet 2 of 3; dated February 11, 2002; received February 12, 2002; prepared by
Philips Engineering.
• Letter of Undertaking (for future channel works in the reach as compensation for the
emergency works); dated January 15, 2002; submitted by W. S. Anderson, P.Eng., City
of Mississauga.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area and to alter a watercourse to
facilitate construction of erosion protection works. An existing parking lot had been undercut
by the erosive impacts of the Spring Creek and warranted immediate attention prior to slope
failure. Truck movement at the top of the slope has been causing visible sloughing. These
works represent the short- term measures and a long -term plan will be implemented through
the Environmental Assessment process. Due to the impending slope hazard, the construction
has proceeded as Emergency Works with TRCA staff approval on February 4, 2002.
Control of Flooding:
The temporary gabion wall and temporary culvert crossing will not provide any obstructions to
flow in the Regional Floodplain.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (rock check dam, pea gravel bags, diversion) will be
implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the
watercourse during construction of the gabion wall.
Conservation of Land:
The in stream works associated with this project required an emergency DFO authorization
which was has been received. The proposed works will impact no significant (terrestrial)
resource features. A geotechnical report has been reviewed by TRCA staff and staff agreed to
the temporary use of the gabion wall. The works involve the construction of a temporary creek
crossing with 2 culverts from the north, which is at a gentler slope, to access the site on the
south side of the watercourse. Works will be completed in the dry by temporarily diverting
flows through a spillway to be constructed north of the erosion site. A temporary 3m high by
1.5 m wide gabion basket wall along a 26 metre reach of the Spring Creek will be constructed.
The gabion wall will be removed in the long -term. Works are now being completed during the
warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31). There will be no exposed areas that will require
restoration as all disturbed areas will be either under the rip rap material or covered by the
gabion wall.
60
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 3.2.1D) - Valley Corridors- of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32833
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: February 14, 2002
CITY OF PICKERING
Application #: 024 /02 /MISS
8.1.2 BOPA DEVELOPMENTS INC.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 1, Plan
388, (245 Finch Avenue), in the City of Pickering, Petticoat Creek Watershed as
located on the property owned by Hydro One Network Services Inc..
The purpose is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of a stormwater
management pond partially within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and partially within the Fill
.Regulated Area, and the construction of an outfall into Petticoat Creek in conjunction with the
development of a residential subdivision for Bopa Development Inc., (Reflections on Petticoat
Creek), File 18T- 98018.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2007 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• General Plan, Drawing No. G -2, dated April 1999, Stormwater Management Pond
Details, Drawing No G -5, dated September 2000, and External Storm Drainage Area
Plan, Drawing No. G -9, dated September 2000, prepared by Land -Pro Engineering
Consultants Inc., date received February 19, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking by Land -Pro Engineering Consultants Inc., dated February 21,
2002 advising that the site will be planted and restored to the satisfaction of TRCA,
the City of Pickering and Hydro One.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and placing fill material for the purpose of constructing a
stormwater management.facility partially within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and partially
within a Fill Regulated Area, having an outfall into Petticoat Creek. The proposed stormwater
management pond has been designed for both water quality and erosion control to service the
proposed residential plan of subdivision to the north, being the Bopa Development, File
18T- 98018.
61
Control of Flooding:
The pond construction, with the exception of a small portion of the spillway, will be located
outside of the Regional Storm floodplain, but partially within the Fill Regulated Area. The
spillway is located partially below the Regional Storm Flood Line but above the 100 Year flood
elevation, and involves some excavation work within the floodplain. No fill placement or
increase in grades will occur within the floodplain portion of the property. Therefore, the
proposed works will not affect the conveyance or storage of flood water.
Pollution:
The stormwater management pond has been designed for quality control and erosion control
in conjunction with the residential subdivision to the north. A combination of silt fencing and
catchbasin sediment traps will also be used.
Conservation of Land:
The pond site is located on Hydro One lands, located south of the proposed subdivision,
approximately 20 to 25 metres from Petticoat Creek. The pond is located outside the Regional
Storm Flood Plain and beyond the erosion hazard associated with the creek. The site will be
planted and restored to the satisfaction of TRCA staff and to Hydro One. Hydro One has
granted authorization to Bopa Development to undertake the pond construction on their land.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32957
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 15, 2002
Application #: 072 /02 /PICK
8.1.3 ST. MARTIN'S CHURCH
To place fill within a regulated area on Block E, Plan 239, (1203 St. Martin's Drive), in
the City of Pickering, Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by St.
Martin's Church.
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the expansion of the church parking
lot.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Grading and Drainage Plan, Drawing No. GS, and Erosion /Siltation Control Plan,
Drawing No. ES, prepared by Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, revision date January
15, 2002, date received February 13, 2002.
• Landscape Plan, prepared by Vertechs Design Inc., dated August 1, 2001, date
received September 19, 2001.
• Letter signed by the Rector and Rector's Warden of St. Martin's Anglican Church Bay
Ridges, dated February 15, 2002, outlining their snow removal plans.
62
• Letter by the City of Pickering Planning & Development Department, dated February
14, 2002, advising that the municipality has no objection to drainage being directed
onto their adjacent lands.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill in a regulated area of Frenchman's Bay to facilitate the construction
- of 39 additional parking spaces on an existing church property. The subject property is
located approximately 1.5 km. north of the Lake Ontario shoreline, approximately 150 metres
east of Frenchman's Bay, an Environmentally Significant Area (ESA), and in close proximity to
the Hydro Marsh, a Provincially Significant Wetland. However, the proposed works will not
impact the adjacent features and is setback to the satisfaction of TRCA biologists. Stormwater
from the site will be treated for both quantity and quality.
Control of Flooding:
The property is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, therefore the proposed
works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Catchbasin sediment traps and silt fencing will be installed and maintained to prevent sediment
from entering Frenchman's Bay.
Conservation of Land:
Stormwater management techniques and sediment and erosion control measures will be
employed on site to ensure there are no impacts on the adjacent ESA and wetland. In
addition, the church has provided a snow removal plan which minimizes the snow piles on site,
addresses snow runoff, and minimizes the use of salt on the parking lot. The proposed works
are consistent will existing development in the corridor reach and are not expected to impact
on any significant resource features. There are na slope stability /geotechnical or fisheries
issues associated with the proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32632
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: October 16, 2001
63
Application #: 327/01/PICK
CITY OF TORONTO [EAST YORK COMMUNITY]
8.1.4 HYDRO ONE NETWORK SERVICES INC.
To place fill within a regulated area on (Redway Drive and Millwood Road and
Dawes Road and Goodwood Park Crescent and Sherbourne Street north of the
Gardiner Expressway), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area),
Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Hydro One Network
Services Inc.
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a regulated area of the Don River and Massey
Creek to facilitate the refurbishment of four sections of transmission towers.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Leaside TS x Hearn GS x Esplanade TS and Todmorden Jct. x Lumsden Jct., 2002
Tower Refurbishment Project, Topographic Key Map and Access and Environmental
Constraint Plans, Drawing Nos. T x L 1, T x L 2, T x L 3, T x L 4, DF x E 1, DF x E 2, H x
B 1, H x B 2, H x B 3, H x B 4, B x L 1, B x L 2 and B x L 3, prepared by Hydro One
Network Services Inc, date received February 15, 2002.
• Letter by Hydro One Network Services Inc., dated February 14, 2002 detailing the four
proposed transmission tower refurbishment projects.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and replace fill in a regulated area of the Don River involving
several sites, to facilitate the refurbishing of four sections of transmission towers. Many of the
sites are located within or adjacent to valley corridors associated with the Don River or its
tributary Taylor Creek, with some sites being located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain.
The refurbishing work involves replacing highly stressed, corroded, or damaged tower
diagonal /strut steel members, replacing hardware and insulators. Prior to undertaking these
works, each tower leg needs to be safety inspected which requires the excavation by hand to a
maximum 24 inches around each tower leg to a depth of approximately 18 to 24 inches to
determine whether the grillage footings have corroded. If necessary, the grillage footing stubs
would be treated with an epoxy coating to minimize corrosion. All excavated fill will be
backfilled by hand to match existing grades. Lightweight trucks, tracked equipment and
4- wheeled ATVs will be used to access these sites utilizing existing access roads, bike paths
and hiking trails which will be restored to present conditions.
Control of Flooding:
Excavations will be open only long enough to conduct a visual safety inspection and possible
epoxy the footing stubs. All excavated fill around the footings will be backfilled to match
existing grades, with no excess spoil remaining. Therefore, the proposed works will not
impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
64
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be installed, where required, to contain temporarily excavated soil on
slopes on near watercourses.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works involve the temporary excavation of fill around transmission tower legs in
order to carry out visual safety inspections prior to tower refurbishment work. The minor
excavation works are not expected to impact on any significant resource features and there are
no slope stability /geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Although Hydro One is exempt from Ont.
Reg. 158 under the Electricity Act, 1998, the applicant has requested that a permit be issued
authorizing the work.
CFN: 32955
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 18, 2002
THE CITY OF TORONTO [ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY]
Application #: 073/02/TOR
8.1.5 THE CITY OF TORONTO
To place fill within a regulated area on (Islington Avenue south of Dixon Road), in
the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed
as located on the property owned by the City of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Humber River to facilitate
bridge repairs.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Islington Avenue Bridge Over Humber Creek, Rehabilitation, South of Dixon Road,
B "ridge No. 176, Drawing No. S- 463 -9, Sheet No. 2, prepared by R. V. Anderson
Associates Limited, dated November 2001, date received January 25, 2002.
• Site Plan and Sediment Control Fence Detail.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate repairs to the existing
Islington Avenue Bridge over a tributary of the Humber River. The works include vertical and
overhead repairs to the concrete surfaces of the abutment walls, and repairs to the retaining
wall and the underside of the deck. No work will be carried out within the watercourse.
65
Control of Flooding:
The works will not affect the storage or conveyance of floodwater as no importation of fill will
occur. Construction debris will be removed from the valleylands.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be installed to prevent migration of sediment into the Humber
River and platforms will be installed beneath the bridge decking to collect any
construction - generated debris.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features. There will be no
vehicle access to the valleylands and there are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to
the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32885
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: January 30, 2002
Application #: 049/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO [SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA]
8.1.6 CITY OF TORONTO
To alter a waterway on Twyn Rivers Drive (SheppardfTwyn Rivers), in the City of
Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Rouge River Watershed as
located on the property owned by the City of Toronto.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse within the Fill Regulated area and Regional Storm
Floodplain of the Rouge River, in order to facilitate emergency repairs required to ensure the
structural integrity of the Twyn Rivers Bridge.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Plan View, and Scaffolding Details, submitted by URS Cole, Sherman &
Associates Ltd., date received January 21, 2001.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
66
Proposal:
The proposal is to alter a watercourse to facilitate the emergency repairs to the Twyn Rivers
bridge to ensure the structural integrity of the bridge. The proposed works involve the
replacement of several horizontal cross - bracing members that have failed. All works will be
done by hand (i.e. no heavy equipment to be used) and required the temporary placement of
two sets of scaffolds in the watercourse which will be removed on a daily basis.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works involve the temporary placement of scaffolds in the watercourse which
will be installed and removed on a daily basis until the project is completed. Therefore, the
proposed repairs s are not expected to affect the conveyance or storage of flood waters.
Pollution:
Erosion control methods will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent
sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
Potential impacts to fisheries habitat can be mitigated through the use of erosion control
measures and restoration of all disturbed areas. The proposed works will require placement of
'scaffolding in the stream which will be placed on plywood sheets in the river to reduce the
impact of the scaffolding feet on the bed of the stream. Scaffolding and plywood will be
removed each evening. All materials will be brought in by hand and carried down the slope to
the river. There will be no alterations to the site grades or vegetation. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues. As these works are emergency in nature, timing does not permit
the work to be conducted within the coldwater fisheries window. However, D.F.O and M.N.R.
have identified conditions to which adherence will ensure this proposal will not constitute any
Harmful Destruction or Alteration to Fish Habitat (H.A.D.D).
Policy Guidelines:
Policy Guidelines: The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32866
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
Date: January 28, 2002
Application #: 038/02/TOR
8.1.7 STEVE AND GLORIA GIDMAN
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 52, Plan 284, (328 Taylor Road), in the
City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Rouge River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Steve and Gloria Gidman.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Rouge River in order to
facilitate the construction of a new addition to an existing dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
67
• Site Plan, Lower Level Floor Plan, Entry/Upper and Top Floor Plan, South, West, North
East Elevations, Photo Survey, prepared by Oksanen And Associates, dated January
2002, received January 23, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Rouge River in order to
facilitate the construction of a new 392 sq. m. (1,285 sq. ft.) two storey addition to the north
east corner of an existing single family dwelling. The proposed works will take place a
minimum of 16 meters from the top of bank.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the floodpiain and will not affect the storage and
conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located approximately 40 metres from the Rouge River. Silt fencing
will be installed between the top of bank and the proposed work to prevent sediment from
entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed addition is located a minimum 16 metres from the stable top of bank area and is
consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. No significant resources features
will be impacted by the proposed works. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues, and
no fisheries concerns associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal complies with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32867
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
Date: January 28, 2002
Application #: 040 /02/TOR
8.1.8 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO C/O BAIRD SAMPSON NEURT ARCHITECTS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 9, 10, Concession 1, (1265 Military Trail),
in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by Governing Council of the University
of Toronto (Scarborough Campus) c/o Ted Relph.
The purpose is to place fill and to conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of
Highland Creek to facilitate construction of a student residence building.
68
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Servicing and Grading Plan, Drawing 201125, prepared by EMC Group Limited,
dated May 2001, revised to January 8th, 2002.
• Planting Plan, Drawing L -3, prepared by Janet Rosenberg & Associates, dated June
26, 2001, revised to January 7th, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The application proposes the construction of a student residence building on the University of
Toronto Scarborough Campus lands, which is to be situated adjacent to the valley corridor of
Highland Creek. The principal structure is to be setback a minimum of 10m from the stable
top -of -bank. Associated fill placement and grading required will not occur within the 10m
setback. The application has been reviewed in conjunction with City of Toronto Site Plan
-application file SPC 2001 0045.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm floodplain associated with
Highland Creek and accordingly, there will be no impacts to the control or conveyance of
flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed a minimum 10m from the top -of -bank to
prevent sediment from entering the valley corridor.
Conservation of Land:
Detailed geotechnical reports have been commissioned by the applicants to confirm the
stability of the valley slope to the satisfaction of staff. No works or vegetation removal is to
occur within the valley lands and landscape planting plans will include enhancements along
the 10m buffer setback to complement the natural conditions in the valley.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal consistent with Section 4.2, New Development, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 32876
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: January 29, 2002
69
Application #: 043/02/TOR
CITY OF VAUGHAN
8.1.9 CITY OF VAUGHAN
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Concession 7, (Woodbridge Avenue,
west of Islington Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by City of Vaughan.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Humber River to facilitate
bridge repairs.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• List of Drawings, General Arrangement, Deck Details and Screed Elevations, Deck
Reinforcement, Pier Modifications, Abutment Modifications, Precast P/S Hollow
Slabs- Layout and Details, Sidewalk and Parapet Wall Details, 600 mm STD Aluminum
Railing, Sections and Details, Drawing Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 of
13, prepared by TSH Engineers, Architect, Planners, dated July 2001, date received
January 23, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the repairs to the
existing Woodbridge Avenue Bridge over the Humber River, between Clarence Street and
Islington Avenue. The works include replacing the bridge superstructure on the existing piers
and abutments.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not affect the storage or conveyance of floodwater as no importation of fill will
occur. All construction debris will be removed from the valleylands.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be installed to prevent migration of sediment into the Humber
River and platforms will be installed beneath the bridge decking to collect any
construction - generated debris.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features. There will be no
vehicle access to the valleylands and there are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to
the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
70
CFN: 32881
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: January 29, 2002
Application #: 046 /02/VAUG
8.1.10 GIANNA PASQUARIELLO
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 8, Concession 7, Plan 546, (93
Meeting House Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located
on the property owned by Gianna Pasquariello.
The purpose is to remove fill and undertake minor grading to facilitate the construction of a
new dwelling within the fill regulated area of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Proposed residence for Pasquariello at Meeting House Road Vaughan, Drawing A -1
prepared by Architectural Design Co. Inc. dated November, 2001.
• Letter of undertaking prepared by Joseph Pasquariello dated February 12, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to remove fill and undertake minor regrading to facilitate the construction of a
new dwelling within the fill regulated area of the Humber River. A recent City of Vaughan
severance application has facilitated the creation of two lots, and the subject application is for
a single family dwelling on a newly created lot. The property is in Woodbridge, outside of the
Special Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm flood plain There will be no
impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from these works as they are 300 metres from the watercourse
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is located within the developed portion of the Humber River valley. • The
subject property was severed into two lots by the City of Vaughan Committee of Adjustment in
November 2001. Authority staff commenting on the proposed severance confirmed that the
new lots would be considered as infill lots and therefore would be consistent with current
Authority programs and policies. The subject property is located at the base of the steep
valley slope. The toe of slope was staked by TRCA staff as an element of the severance
application, and all proposed development is outside of the staked area.
71
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification
Within Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32892
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: February 5, 2002
TOWN OF CALEDON
Application #: 056 /02/VAUG
8.1.11 ENBRIDGE CONSUMERS GAS
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on (East Side of The Gore
Road South of Old School Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Enbridge Consumers Gas.
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a regulated area to facilitate a gas main crossing
the Humber River by directional bore method.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan prepared by Enbridge Consumers Gas, Drawing No. 20- 6268 -01, dated
December 17, 2001.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a regulated area to facilitate a gas main crossing
the Humber River by directional bore method.
Control of Flooding:
No excavated material will be stockpiled within the Regional Floodplain and all existing grades
will be maintained. The proposed works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood
waters.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will encircle the bore pits to impede the overland migration of construction
generated sediments.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no in- stream works and no impact to riparian vegetation. The gas main will be
installed through directional boring a minimum of 1.5 metres beneath the watercourse.
Sediment fencing will be erected at the bore pit locations and all disturbed areas will be
revegetated following construction. There are no fisheries concerns or geotechnical issues
related to this proposal.
72
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32770
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: January 4, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 006 /02 /CAL
8.1.12 GO TRANSIT
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 18, Concession 8, Part 1 Plan 64R -3729, (Mount
Joy Go Station, Bur Oak Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Go Transit.
The purpose is to construct a new Go Transit station, platform and parking lot that will be
temporarily within the flood plain of the Rouge River.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing GN -01 - Mount Joy Station General Notes, Drawing List and Legend, dated
December 7, 2001 prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Limited.
• Drawing SP -01 - Mount Joy. Station Civil Existing Conditions and Removals, dated
December 7, 2001 prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Limited.
Drawing SP -02 - Mount Joy Station Civil Proposed Work, dated December 7, 2001
prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Limited.
• Drawing C -01 - Mount Joy Station Civil Parking Lot Servicing and Grading, dated
December 7, 2001 prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Limited.
• Drawing C-02 - Mount Joy Station Civil Platform Servicing and Grading, dated
December 7, 2001 prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Limited.
• Drawing C -03 - Mount Joy Station Civil Details, dated December 7, 2001 prepared by
R.V. Anderson Associates Limited.
• Letter Dated December 13, 2001 from Go Transit acknowledging acceptance of
responsibility for damages, should a major flood event occur during construction.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a Go Station and platform within the flood plain of the Rouge
River. The watercourse is east of the proposed platform location. There is a culvert upstream
of the site that crosses the rail line that is not sized to convey the regional flow. This culvert is
being replaced with a larger culvert under a separate permit issued June 26, 2001. The new
73
culvert will be installed July, 2002 and upon completion, the subject property will no longer be
in the flood plain. The Go Station will not be operational until Fall, 2002. Construction is
scheduled to commence in May, 2002.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is currently within the flood plain. Completion of culvert installation
approved under a separate permit application will remove the subject property from the flood
plain. As the proposed works are expected to commence in May, 2002, construction will occur
within the flood plain for two months. The Go Station will not be functioning until Fall, 2002.
Pollution:
Rock check dams, silt control fences and filter fabric covers will be installed on all catch basins
within the construction site, and will be maintained. The sediment control features will not be
removed until the works are complete and the area is re- vegetated.
Conservation of Land:
The works are proposed on land that is currently vacant. There are no resource features on
the property.
Policy Guidelines:
As the completed works will be entirely outside of the flood plain, the project complies with
Authority Policy 4.2.2 A) 1, Development within Highly Urbanized Areas.
CFN: 32828
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: January 17, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 023 /02 /MARK
8.1.13 CENTRAL -VERSA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
To alter a waterway on Part Lot 53, 54, Concession 1 EYS Part Lot 53, 54, Plan
65R- 21577, (Yorkland Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Central -Versa Development Corporation.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse, Rouge Tributary B, through the outletting of stormwater.
The subject site is not within a Fill Regulated Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing 2; Project 99 -130; Site Servicing Plan- Concept "C "; dated May 2000; last
revised February 2, 2002; received February 19, 2002; prepared by David Schaeffer
Engineering Ltd.
• Temporary Rock Flow Check- Typical Detail; Ontario Provincial Standard Drawing;
received February 19, 2002.
74
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to restoration plans on or before
April 1, 2002) dated February 15, 2002; received February 15, 2002; prepared by the
owner, Central Care Corporation.
• L1.01, L1.02, L1.03; dated June 30, 2000; received January 3, 2001; prepared by
KPMB Architects.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of constructing a storm sewer outfall to a tributary of the Rouge River
which is immediately east of the site. The storm sewer outfall is requirea to service the
proposed long term care facility and associated parking.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed outfall is not located within a Regional Storm Floodplain therefore it will not have
any implications to flooding.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt control fence, rock check dam) will be implemented to
ensure that construction- generated sediments do not enter the watercourse during
construction of the outfall. The outfall channel will be constructed as a thermal trench in order
to cool the waters before releasing them to the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored following construction. The outfall construction will be
conducted• in the dry with a rock check dam at the watercourse interface. With the erosion
and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, destruction, disruption
(HADD) of fish habitat through sedimentation will be mitigated. No significant resource features
will be impacted by the proposed works. There are no slope stability issues related to the
works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing- of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 31458
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: February 14, 2002
Application #: 205 /00 /RH
8.1.14 MIKE & ZORA PARIC
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 64, Plan 2027, Part 2 Part 3 Plan 65R- 17097, (72
Pemberton Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located
.on the property owned by Mike & Zora Paric.
75
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area to facilitate construction of a new home on an
existing residential lot, and to construct a driveway in the flood plain to access the home.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Servicing and Grading Plan prepared by Bebris Architect dated December 12,
2001.
• Letter of Undertaking dated February 11, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant is proposing to construct a driveway at grade crossing the flood plain to provide
access to a house site outside of the flood plain. The new driveway is to be located on the
alignment of a previous driveway. No filling is required, and there is potential for safe egress
north of the property in a regional storm. The subject lands were previously owned by the
Authority, and a land swap was conducted in 1994 to switch more flood prone lands to the east
with the subject property. This resulted in the landowner being able to construct a house
entirely outside of the flood plain. The Authority previously issued permit C -94187 for a similar
development on the subject property. The current applicant is re- applying as the property has
recently changed hands, and the previous permit was non - transferrable.
Control of Flooding:
As the proposal includes paving an existing driveway, there will be minimal grading in the flood
plain, and therefore no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment control fence will be installed between the construction area and the creek, and will
remain until the area is sodded and the construction is complete to prevent sedimentation of
the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
An historical land exchange between the previous owner and the TRCA allowed the Authority
to acquire the land adjacent to the watercourse, and the associated riparian area. This
exchange ensures that the majority of the valley lands will remain in a natural state. There are
no geotechnical issues or fisheries concerns associated with the site.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.D) - Replacement Structures within Highly
Urbanized Areas of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32781
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: January 7, 2002
76
Application #: 011 /02 /RH
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES. #816/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.15 - 8.1.17, inclusive), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items, for
which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF TORONTO [MIDTOWN COMMUNITY]
8.1.15 MINDY GANZ
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 6, Plan 2405,
(43 Donino Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mindy Ganz.
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a Fill Regulated Area and construct a building
within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004.
• Site plan no. A -1, dated February 26, 2002, by C.R. of Richard Wengle Architect Inc., 3
elevations dated December 17, 2001, January 4, 2002, and January 7, 2002, by C.R. of
Richard Wengle Architect Inc., and letter of undertaking dated February 26, 2002 by
Andrew Dean of Richard Wengle Architect Inc..
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of replacing an existing two -story residence with a new two -story
residence. The subject property is located within the Hogg's Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA)
which allows for development within the floodplain provided it meets SPA criteria. The
proposed design meets all applicable criteria as the residence will be flood- proofed above the
Regional Flood Elevation.
Control of Flooding:
Impacts to flooding should be minimal as the new residence is only slightly larger than the
existing structure.
Pollution:
The residence is setback from the river by over 100 metres but will still be utilizing standard
sediment and erosion control fencing to ensure that construction - generated sediments do not
enter the watercourse.
77
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas are to be restored following construction. As there will be no instream
works there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. No significant resource features will
be impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32889
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: January 30, 2002
Application #: 053/02/TOR
8.1.16 ROSLIN HOLDINGS LTD.
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 11, Plan M -275, Lot 3, 4, Plan M -554, (207
- 217 Roslin Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area),
Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Roslin Holdings Ltd..
The purpose is to place fill within a Regulated Area, in order to facilitate the construction of a
13 -unit residential development, consisting of townhouses and single family dwellings.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2007.
• Sheet A101 - Site Plan - dated January 25, 2002, prepared by Burka Varacalli
Architects.
• Redline Revised February 27, 2002, to indicate silt fence to be established on site
during construction.
• Sheet A102 - Grading Plan - dated January 25, 2002, prepared by Burka Varacalli
Architects.
• Letter dated February 27, 2002 stating that the landscaping /planting plan for the site
will be to the satisfaction of the TRCA.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To place fill in a regulated area in order to construct a multi -unit residential development,
consisting of 10 townhouses and 3 single family detached dwellings. The proposed works are
adjacent to the Sherwood Ravine, with all grading sufficiently setback from the stable top of
bank. The works will be conducted in accordance with an approved application by the Ontario
Municipal Board.
78
Control'of Flooding:
The works are not 'ocated within the Regulatory Flood Plain, and therefore will not affect the
conveyance or storage of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposal will not result in the sedimentation of the watercourse, as the proposed works are
located more than 30 metres from the watercourse. Silt fencing will be erected for the duration
of the construction.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not affect any significant resource features, and there are no fisheries
or geotechnical issues related to the project. The site will be restored by planting with native,
woody species.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.1.1 New Urban Development, of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32963
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: February 18, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO [SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY]
Application #: 076/02/TOR
8.1.17 SINCLAIR AND WEBSTER
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 161, 162, Plan M440, (20 Meadowcliffe
Drive), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront
Watershed as located on the property owned by Sinclair and Webster.
The purpose is to place fill in a Regulated Area in order to demolish one existing single family
detached dwelling, and to construct two, new single family detached dwellings.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004.
• Sheet No. 01 - Lot Drainage and House Siting Control Plan - dated February 15, 2002,
prepared by Bebris Architect. Redline Revised February 27, 2002 to include silt fence.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill in a regulated area in order to demolish an existing single family
detached dwelling, and to construct two new.single family detached dwellings. The property is
situated on the Scarborough Bluffs of the Lake Ontario waterfront. The proposed new
dwellings are setback sufficiently from the stable slope line; the setback is also consistent with
79
existing properties in the same shoreline reach. Staff reviewed and accepted the concept for
this development through the review of a minor variance application for the property.
Control of Flooding:
The works are not located within the Regulatory flood plain, and therefore will not affect the
storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposal will not result in sedimentation of Lake Ontario, as the new dwellings will be
constructed more than 65 metres from the crest of the Bluffs. Silt fencing will be established on
site for the duration of the demolition and construction works.
Conservation of Land:
The project will not impact any significant resource features. There are no fisheries issues
related to the project. The applicant submitted a geotechnical report for the property that was
reviewed and accepted by staff. The proposed works are in accordance with the stable slope
setback reflected in the geotechnial report. Following the completion of construction, the site
will be planted with native, woody species.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.1.1, New Urban Development, of the
Authority's Valley and Steam Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32973
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: February 21, 2002
CITY OF BRAMPTON
Application #: 079/02/TOR
8.1.18 HYDRO ONE BRAMPTON NETWORKS INC.
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Concession 8 NDS, in the City of
Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Hydro
One Brampton Networks Inc..
The purpose is to place fill in a Regulated Area in order to install four 4 -inch, high density
polyethyline, underground ducts, and a concrete manhole to accommodate underground
cables.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004.
• Drawing TS136 -6 -1, titled Civil Layout, dated January 30, 2002, and prepared by
Brampton Hydro.
• Letter, dated February 25, 2002 from Loris Coletta, Hydro One Brampton, stating that
sediment control measures will be implemented as required, and that site restoration
with a native seed mix, will be undertaken after completion of the works.
80
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill in a Regulated Area in order to install four 4 -inch, high density
polyethyline underground ducts, and a concrete manhole to accommodate underground
cables. The proposed works are located partially on Authority owned lands. The Authority's
Property Section staff has recommended the approval of an easement to the Authority's
Executive Committee's March 1, 2002 meeting, to be registered in favour of the applicant, for
the purpose of the proposed works and the maintenance of those works. In addition, an
archeological assessment is required; the permit will be held pending completion of the
archeological assessment by TRCA staff.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regulatory Flood Plain, and will therefore not
affect the conveyance or storage of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are not expected to result in the sedimentation of any watercourse, as the
works are located more than 100 metres from the watercourse. Silt fencing will be established
on site as required.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact any significant resource features. There are no fisheries or
geotechnical issues related to the project. The site will be stabilized with a native seed mix
following completion of the works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 (A), Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32961
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: February 15, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 067 /02 /BRAM
8.1.19 LIFESTYLE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 11, 12, 13, Concession 1, (7700
Bayview Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Lifestyle Retirement Communities.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill material for minor lot grading as part of the
construction of an 84 square metre front entrance addition to the existing Glynnwood
Retirement Residence, within the Fill Regulated Area of the East Don River.
81
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan prepared by Marilyn Ypes Architect Inc., Project 2001 -12, Drawing 1A dated
August 2001; received January 23, 2002.
• Landscape Plan submitted by Marilyn Ypes Architect Inc. dated October 16, 2001;
received January 23, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and placing fill material for minor lot grading as part of the
construction of an 84 square metre front entrance addition to the existing Glynnwood
Retirement Residence. The proposed addition, as well as the majority of the existing building,
is located within the Fill Regulated Area of the East Don River.
Control of Flooding:
The entire retirement residence building (including the proposed addition) is located outside
the Regional Storm flood plain. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected by the
proposed works.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected during construction since the work site is situated approximately
70 metres from the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The entire building is located on tableland; the proposed addition is more than 10 metres from
the top -of -bank of the well - defined and stable East Don River valley corridor. There are no
slope instability or geotechnical issues evident at this site. No significant resource features will
be impacted by the proposed works; all disturbed and graded areas will be revegetated
following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(C) - Minor Additions - and Section 4.2.2(E) - Property
Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program.
CFN: 32880
Report Prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: February 26, 2002
82
Application #: 045 /02 /MARK
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
8.1.20 BERNARD SILVESTRI
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 39, 40, Plan 2027, (31 Walmer Road), in
the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Bernard Silvestri.
The purpose is to remove an existing home and reconstruct a larger single family dwelling
within a fill regulated area of the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of March 1, 2002 to February 28, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Lot Grading Plan 31 Walmer Road prepared January 2, 2002 by Bernie Silvestri.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
Remove an existing house and reconstruct a larger single family dwelling in a fill regulated area
of the Don River. The subject property is within an existing residential neighbourhood of
Richmond Hill, and a watercourse flows behind the house. The proposed house will not be
.located closer to the watercourse, and all works are set back at least 10 metres from the flood
plain. The subject property is currently sodded, and the construction will not result in a loss of
any natural features.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are outside of the regional storm flood plain therefore there will be no
impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be erected prior to construction and will remain until the works are
complete and the area has been sodded, to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The property is located within a developed portion of the Don River valley. The subject
property is currently a residential lot. There are no resource features on the property. The
proposed home is the same distance from the channel as the original dwelling.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 D) - Replacement Structures within Highly
Urbanized Areas of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32874
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: January 29, 2002
83
Application #: 042/02/RH
RES. #B17/02 - AUTHORITY REALTY TAXES
Tax Consultant, CFN 26340. Hiring of Yeoman & Associates Inc. to assist
with a review of all realty taxable Authority holdings to determine if the
2002 current value assessment attributed to the properties are fair and
reasonable, to assist with negotiation with the Assessment Offices for
reduction of assessed values and appeal any assessed values where
negotiations are unsuccessful.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Irene Jones
THAT the firm of Yeoman & Associates Inc. be engaged to assist with the review of all
realty taxable Authority holdings, to assist with negotiation with the Assessment Offices
and to assist with any necessary assessment appeals to a limit of $10,000 plus G.S.T.
and reasonable expenses.
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to contact the Municipal Property Assessment
Corporation (MPAC) to express Authority concerns over recurring overvalued Authority
properties and request MPAC to Investigate other methods that would generate more
accurate Fair Market Value for Authority properties in determining current value
assessment.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Province of Ontario introduced a province wide current value realty tax system in 1998.
This new system was to be phased in over a five -year period. For the first three years (1998,
1999 and 2000) the current values of properties in the province were based on their value as of
June 30, 1996. For the years 2001 and 2002 the current values of properties in the province
are based on their value as of June 30, 1999.
Yearly assessments will begin in 2003 for the 2004 taxation year. The valuation date will be
June 30th of the year receding the taxation year. Starting in 2005, assessed values will be an
average of the current year and the previous year, and in 2006 this will be expanded to include
the two previous years.
This re- assessment was done in a much shorter period of time than most experts advised. The
assessments were generated using computer models, which is fairly accurate for similar types
of properties with large volumes of sales such as residential. As Authority lands are unique,
there was a high probability that there would be incorrect assessments when determining
current value assessment.
In 1998 quotations were obtained from three tax consultants to assist with a review of all realty
taxable Authority holdings, to assist with negotiation with the Assessment Offices and to assist
with any necessary assessment appeals. Yeoman & Associates Inc. was the successful firm
and was hired to undertake this work in May of 1998.
While the focus of this initial phase of this project was to review all Authority holdings to identify
assessments that were unreasonable, there was some flexibility to undertake discussions with
84
the various Assessment Offices to resolve any significant discrepancies in values. As a result
of this review and discussions with the Assessment Offices, Yeoman & Associates Inc.
achieved an initial reduction in 1998 taxes of approximately $70,000. Also, as a result of this
review process, appeals were filed in 1998 for 116 roll numbers. In late 1998 Yeoman &
Associates Inc. was engaged by the Authority to finalize the outstanding 1998 assessment
appeals.
As a result of the 1998 province wide re- assessment, a high number of assessments were
considered incorrect and an overwhelming number of assessment appeals were filed with the
Assessment Review Board. This created quite a back log for the Assessment Review Board
resulting in Hearing dates for 1998 appeals being delayed. In the case of the Authority,
Pre - Hearing dates for the Authority's outstanding 1998 assessment appeals were delayed until
early 2000. The 116 roll numbers were automatically appealed for 1999 and 2000 with no
additional appeal fees being payable. The Authority also appealed an additional 24 roll
numbers for properties that were acquired during this time.
Through extensive negotiations with Assessment Offices in the Regions of York, Durham and
Peel, on behalf on the Authority, Yeoman & Associates Inc. were able to achieve for the years
1998 to 2000 reductions of taxes of approximately $85,000 per year on top of the
approximately $70,000 per year achieved from the initial review. For the 2001 tax year a total of
125 'properties were appealed in Durham, York and Peel Regions. To date, 65 of the 125
appeals for 2001 have been finalized and achieved reductions in taxes of approximately
$43,500. Negotiations with Assessment Officials in the Region of York is ongoing for the 2001
taxation year, and we anticipate resolving these appeals in early 2002.
Given Yeoman & Associates Inc. involvement with the Authority's tax assessment appeals as
well as their understanding of the unique characteristics of Authority owned lands, staff is
recommending hiring-Yeoman & Associates Inc. to continue to undertake a review of all new
2002 assessments. In recognizing that there is an opportunity to have discussions with
Assessment Offices prior to the April 2, 2002 appeal deadline with the possibility to reach an
agreement to reduce the assessment without the Authority having to pay any appeal fee, it is
important to undertake the necessary review of all our assessments in a timely manner. The
appeal fee for 2002 is $50.00 per roll number.
RATIONALE
The knowledge gained by Yeoman & Associates Inc. of Authority properties and their values
during the 1998 -2001 appeals will be beneficial in reviewing the 2002 assessments. Yeoman &
Associates Inc. has demonstrated their ability and experience in dealing with assessment
related matters.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Funds are provided for this activity in the budget for the Property Section. Account code
003-70
Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Date: February 13, 2002
85
RES. #B18/02 - RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE AND POLICY
Annual update report which recommends updates to TRCA's Retention
Schedule and Policy.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Irene Jones
THAT the amended Records Retention Schedule and Policy dated February 8, 2002, be
approved.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Regularly, the Authority updates its Records Retention Schedule to reflect various fiscal,
operational and legal changes which may occur. The Schedule and Policy is the backbone for
the Records Management system in that it governs the life of all Authority Records.
Accordingly, it is adjusted yearly.
RATIONALE
Records staff have been concerned with the growing number of records which have accrued
through the years. As a result, staff performed a comprehensive review of the Retention
Schedule to determine the value and life of each record series. The schedule itself, governs
records which have a very short retention period, such as a year, to records which have a
permanent retention. Organizations typically have 3 to 5% as permanent records. The
Authority's permanent records number close to 15 %. In the review, staff specifically looked at
record series which had the permanent retention. Interviews were set up with either the
Manager or Director and changes were made.
The new Retention Schedule allows for records to be brought forward and reviewed rather than
being stored indefinitely or permanently. Records which reach the end of their retention life
can be either destroyed, purged, kept for an additional year or archived. Files are only
destroyed upon the Director's or the CAO's written approval.
Staff also recognized a need to create another category. As such, a record category known as
critical was added. In the event of a disaster such as a flood, fire or tornado, these marked
records would be the ones which would be identified and restored as soon as possible.
Typically, they are records which contain the history or memory of the Authority or proof of
ownership. Without these, it would be difficult for the Authority to continue operation.
Report prepared by: John Annunziello, extension 5272
For Information contact: John Annunziello, extension 5272
Telka Zilans, extension 5216
Date: February 06, 2002
Attachments: 1
86
Attachment 1
REVISED RECORDS RETENTION POLICY
1.0 PURPOSE
This policy provides for management of Authority records, ensuring efficiency in the creation,
storage, retrieval and disposition of records. Procedures based on the policy will facilitate the
retaining of Authority records, including the prevention of the creation of unnecessary records
and the appropriate destruction of records upon the conclusion of their retention periods.
2.0 DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY
For the purpose of this policy:
a) "File" or "Record" shall mean the composition of documents, reports, receipts, vouchers,
instruments, plans, surveys and any other papers, be it in their original form or a
microform or an electronic form, that is certified by an authorized officer of the Authority.
b) "Location" is a specified area where records are stored.
c) "Records Retention Schedule" defines the Record Series and retention periods for all
records currently held by the Authority.
d) "Active" files are records which are maintained on -site due to their referral frequency.
e) "Storage" files are those which are referred to infrequently, but which must be retained
for a specified period of time.
f) "Critical Records" are those records that are essential to the continuation and
resumption of Authority business, fulfillment of obligations to employees and other
outside interests, and to recreating the financial and legal status of the Authority in case
of emergency. Briefly, these are records which are needed to enable the Authority to
recover from a disaster situation with minimum dislocation, cost and risk.
3.0 RECORDS RETENTION PRINCIPLES
For purposes of this policy, the following principles shall be applied in the retention of records
by the Authority:
• All records created by the Authority shall be categorized in accordance with the Records
Retention Schedule attached to this policy, and governed by the retention periods defined.
• With the exception of the Financial Records and the Personnel Records, all files shall be
assigned a Central Filing Number (CFN). The Computerized Records Management
Software will clearly identify the Record Series and retention period of each record.
87
• At the conclusion of each record's retention period, the record shall be brought to the
attention of the Director responsible, who may extend the retention period by up to one
year.
• Files and records will be reviewed for the purpose of eliminating duplication of documents.
• No records shall be destroyed without written authorization from the Director responsible or
the Chief Administrative Officer.
• Wherever feasible and in accordance with legal requirements, documents shall be
microfilmed in accordance with the National Standard of Canada CAN2-72 11-29 entitled
"Microfilm as Documentary Evidence ". Procedures for microfilming will be those generally
accepted by the Government of Canada, Ministry of National Revenue. Originals and
written copies of documents, having been microfilmed in accordance with the National
Standard of Canada, may be destroyed. This policy shall apply to documents previously
microfilmed.
• Any changes to the Retention Schedule are noted and presented to the Authority for
approval as part of the regular review of the Retention Schedule.
88
** PLEASE NOTE - ALL TIME PERIODS REPRESENT A TIME AT WHICH FILES WILL BE
REVIEWED AND DESTROYED IF THE FILE IS NO LONGER NEEDED **
**A1/ Retentions In BOLD represent NEW Retention Periods **
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
Main Series File Series
5 years Administration
Critical Authority Boards & Committees; Original Minutes &
Agendas
10 years Central Filing Information
10 years Conservation Authorities Act and Related Legislation
6 years Contingent Liability *1
25 years Contracts & Agreements
15 years Day Planners
7 years Freedom of Information Requests *2
Critical Historical Reference Material
6 years Insurance Claim Settlement
50 years Insurance Policies
10 years Legal Opinions
until case is closed + 6 years Litigation Claims
25 years Orders -in- Council
25 years Policies & Regulations
3 years Printing & Office Supplies
15 years Safety Officer's Reports
5 years Staff & Committee Meetings
25 years Statistics
7 years Tenders - Successful
2 years Tenders - Unsuccessful
*1 Longer if party Injured Is Under the Age of 18
*2 Contains Confidential Information
89
CONSERVATION AREAS & FIELD CENTRES
Main Series File Series
10 years
5 years
25 years
10 years
10 years
7 years
Concession Operations *3
Correspondence *3
Maintenance & Development
Recreation Programs *3
Special Functions
Conservation Permits (camping)
Listed below are the Sub - Series which will be under each File Series:
Albion Hills Conservation Area
Albion Hills Field Centre
Black Creek Pioneer Village
Boyd Conservation Area
Boyd Field Centre
Bruce's Mill Conservation Area
Claireville Conservation Area
Claremont Field Centre
Cold Creek Conservation Area
Glen Haffy Conservation Area
Glen Major Conservation Area
Greenwood Conservation Area
Heart Lake Conservation Area
Kortright Centre
Lake St. George Field Centre
Nursery
Other Conservation Areas
Other M.T.R.C.A. Properties
Petticoat Creek Conservation Area
Waterfront Areas
*3 Sub - Series of General exists
FINANCIAL
Main Series File Series
7 years Accounts Receivable Audit Trail Reports
25 years Annual Returns Revenue Canada
25 years (Critical) Audited Financial Statements
25 years (Critical) Authority Budget
7 years Automatic Disbursement Cheque Register
7 years Bank Statements, Cancelled Cheques & Bank Reconciliation Files
50 years Budget Status
7 years Budget Working Papers
3 years Cash Requirements Creation, Reports & Automatic Cash Disbursement
2 years Central Stores Material Requisitions
50 years Computerized Area Weekly Revenue Reports
7 years Customer Invoice Copies
2 years Daily Cheque Listing
5 years Deposit Listings
7 years Distribution Reports, Interfaces & Purges
4 years Duplicate Cash Receipts, Vouchers & Customer Cheque Copies
2 years Duplicate Cheque Copies
7 years Federal Gas Tax Rebates Application Copies
20 years Financial Statement Working Papers
7 years Food & Area Weekly Revenue Reports
7 years Food Service Purchase Summary Reports
7 years GST Distribution Report
7 years Investments
7 years Invoice Authorization Report
7 years Journal Entries /General Journals
7 years Journals & Registers
7 years Manual & US Cheque Register
7 years Metro /MNR Budget Working Papers
25 years MNR Claim Files
3 years Month -to -Date Detailed General Ledger
7 years Monthly Aged Trial Balance Reports
7 years Monthly PST Remittance Copies
7 years Monthly Visa Logs
7 years Operating Statements
1 years Outstanding Purchase Orders by Account Report
7 years Payables Voucher Registers with Approved Invoice Registers
10 years Project Files - Budgeting
7 years Property Tax Information
7 years PST Support Files
1 year Purchase Order Reports & Registers
7 years Receipt Books
10 years Revenue Sharing Policy Files
7 years US Vendor File
7 years Vehicle /Equipment
91
FINANCIAL (Continued)
Main Series File Series
3 years Vendor Audit Trail Reports
7 years Vendor Files
7 years Vendor History Purge Report
7 years Voided Purchase Orders File
Critical Year -to -Date Detailed General Ledger /Balance Sheets
7 years Year- to-Date Vendor Listing Report
LAND MANAGEMENT
Main Series File Series
Critical Acquisitions *3
8 years Appraisals
10 years Assessment Appeals & Notices *3
25 years Dams & Reservoirs *3
Critical Deeds
Critical Easements
Until encroachment ceases + 7 years Encroachments
25 years Erosion Control Maintenance *3
25 years Erosion Control Properties
5 years Erosion Control Studies *3
25 years ESA Study
25 years ESA's *3
Critical Expropriations
6 years Hazard Tree Removal
Permanent HEC -II Revisions Files *3
25 years Land filling *3
25 years Leases *3
Permanent Legal Surveys *3
25 years Property Management *3
25 years Reforestation *3
Moved out tenants + 7 years Rental Tenancies
Critical Sales
25 years Sediment Control
25 years Site Specific Projects
10 years Strategy & Implementation *4
10 years Vegetation Management
Listed below are the Sub - Series which will be under each File Series:
Carruthers Creek Watershed
Don River Watershed
Duffin Creek Watershed
Etobicoke Creek Watershed
Highland Creek Watershed
Humber River Watershed
Mimico Creek Watershed
Petticoat Creek Watershed
Rouge River Watershed
Waterfront
*3 Sub - Series of General exists
*4 Sub - Series of M.T.R.C.A. Jurisdiction exists
PERSONNEL
Main Series File Series
7 years after employee leaves Annual T -4 Reports & Duplicate T -4's
7 years after employee leaves Attendance Records
7 years Benefit Plan Administration Files
7 years Benefit Plan Enrolment Cards
7 years Canada Pension Plan
5 years Canada Savings Bond Purchase Applications
Permanent Employee Accident Reports
2 years Employer Copies of Pay Stubs
7 years Employer Health Tax
6 months Employment Applications
Permanent Employment History Cards
10 years Employment Programs
7 years Employment Programs Working Papers
5 years Expense Sheets
Permanent Omers Statements
2 years Payroll Benefit Copies
7 years Payroll Registers
10 years Personnel Administrations
7 years Position Descriptions
10 years Staff Training Programs
7 years TD1s
Permanent Teachers Pension
5 years Time Sheets
7 years Workers Compensation Board
PLANNING
Main Series File Series
50 years By -law Development Applications - Comments
1 year By -law Development Applications - No Objections
50 years Comprehensive Zoning By -laws
15 years Concept Development/Regulation Property Enquiries -
Non-Actioned
25 years Condominium Applications - Comments
5 years Condominium Applications - No Objections
Permanent Environmental Assessment Act Submissions *3 *7
50 years Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways Regulation
Applications - Actioned *6
15 years Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterways Regulation
Applications - Non - Actioned
25 years GIS - Geographic Information System
25 years Land Divisions (Consents) - Comments
5 years Land Divisions (Consents) - No Objections
25 years Mapping *3
25 years Niagara Escarpment Commission - Comments *5
1 year Niagara Escarpment Commission - No Objections *5
50 years Official Plan Amendments - Comments *7
5 years Official Plan Amendments - No Objections *7
75 years Official Plans *7
25 years Parkway Belt Exemptions - Comments *5
1 year Parkway Belt Exemptions - No Objections *5
15 years Property Clearances
50 years Secondary Plans /Land Use Studies
25 years Site Plan Control (S.41) - Comments
5 years Site Plan Control (S.41) - No Objections
25 years Solicitor /Realtor Written Responses *3
50 years Specialized Municipal By -laws
50 years Storm Water Management *3 *7
50 years Studies & Reports *3
50 years Subdivision Applications
25 years Sub - watershed Planning
25 years Variances - Comments
1 year Variances - No Objections
after viol. Is closed + 30 years Violations
25 years Zoning Amendments - Comments
5 years Zoning Amendments - No Objections
95
Listed below are the Sub - Series which will be under each File Series:
Adjala - Tosorontio, Township of
Aurora, Town of
Caledon, Town of
Markham, Town of
Mono, Town of
Pickering, City of
Scarborough, City of
Uxbridge, Township of
Whitchurch - Stouffville, Town of
Scarborough Community - City of Toronto
North York Community - City of Toronto
Midtown Community - City of Toronto
Toronto East York Community - City of Toronto
Humber York Community - City of Toronto
Etobicoke Community - City of Toronto
*3 Sub - Series of General exists
Sub - Series are not applicable
*6 Sub - Series of Permit Appeals exists
Sub - Series of Durham Region, Peel Region, Metro Tor., Tor. & York Region exist
*5
*7
Ajax, Town of
Brampton, City of
Etobicoke, City of
Mississauga, City of
North York, City of
Richmond Hill, Town of
Toronto, City of
Vaughan, City of
York, City of
PROGRAMS
Main Series
Critical
10 years
10 years
5 years
25 years
10 years
File Series
Archaeology
Fisheries Management
Recreational Vehicles
Special Projects /Events
Water Management
Wildlife Management
MARKETING / FOUNDATION
Main Series
Critical
5 years
5 years
10 years
5 years
5 years
5 years
5 years
5 years
3 years
25 years after opening
File Series
Annual Reports
Authority Brochures & Publications
B. Harper Bull Conservation Fellowship Award
Charitable Programs
Donations
Exhibits
Films
Marketing
Membership
Newspapers & Magazines
Official Openings
96
MARKETING / FOUNDATION (Continued)
Main Series File Series
5 years
5 years
25years after event
Presentations /Public Meetings/Workshops - External
Presentations /Public Meetings/Workshops - Internal
Special Functions
REGENERATION PROJECTS
Main Series File Series
Permanent Aquatic Habitat
Permanent Terrestrial Habitat
Permanent Wetland Habitat *These files are only in Electronic
Format **
Permanent Water Quality *1
Permanent Water Quantity
Permanent General
Listed below are the Sub - Series which will be under each File Series:
Carruthers Creek Watershed
Don River Watershed
Duffin Creek Watershed
Etobicoke Creek Watershed
Highland Creek Watershed
Humber River Watershed
Mimico Creek Watershed
Petticoat Creek Watershed
Rouge River Watershed
Waterfront
N/A
*1 Sub - Series of All Watersheds exists
WATERSHED STRATEGIES
Main Series File Series
10 years Budget
5 years Correspondence
10 years Membership Information
Critical Minutes
10 years (Sub) Committee
25 years Projects (Concepts /Community Action Sites)
25 years Programs
25 years Publications
25 years Statistics
25 years Studies & Reports
10 years Special Projects /Events
10 years Public Meetings/Workshops
10 years Legal
Listed below are the Sub - Series which will be under each File Series:
Carruthers Creek Watershed
Don River Watershed
Duffin Creek Watershed
Etobicoke Creek Watershed
Highland Creek Watershed
Humber River Watershed
Mimico Creek Watershed
Petticoat Creek Watershed
Rouge River Watershed
Waterfront
N/A
All Watersheds
99
RES. #B19/02 - TENDER AWARD FOR A TRACTOR WITH ATTACHMENTS FOR THE
CLAREMONT FIELD CENTRE
The awarding of the tender for the acquisition of a new 2002 tractor with
attachments for the Claremont Field Centre.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Irene Jones
THAT tender ES 02 -05 for the acquisition of one new 2002 tractor with the specified
attachments be awarded to Kooy Brothers Lawn Equipment in the total sum of $
37,294.20, it being the lowest tender price received and meeting all specifications.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority's Policy and Procedures for the Purchase of Goods and Services of Equipment
requires the Executive Committee approval for selection of successful tenders for acquisitions
between $25,000 and $100,000.
ANALYSIS
In accordance with the Authority's policy, staff has examined the need for acquisition of
Authority owned equipment. The acquisition of equipment is determined by evaluating the
requirements and operations of the location; the condition of the existing equipment including
the mechanical fitness (cost/benefit of repairs), age, hours used, and available funds in the
Vehicle and Equipment budget. At Claremont Field Centre, the location has shared equipment
from the various Conservation Areas on a required basis which produced inefficiencies of not
getting equipment at a required time, thus resulting in various jobs not been completed on
time. It was determined that the Claremont Field Centre required their own equipment for their
year round operation similar to Lake St. George Field Centre.
The members of the Tender Opening Sub - Committee met on February 22, 2002 to open
tenders for ES 02 -05
Tender Opening Sub - Committee
The tender bids are as follows:
Tender: Tractor with Attachments for the Tender #: ES 02 -05
Claremont Field Centre
Supplier Total Tendered Price
(includes PST & GST)
Kooy Brothers Lawn Ecuipment $ 37,294.20
- lutchinson Farm Supp y lc. 5 37,540.00
Stewart's New Holla,d _tc. S40,020.00
Nobleton Farm Sery ce Ltd. S 40,53-.65
Westmetro Equipment Sales Ltd. S 40,367.00
100
IT WAS AGREED AND RECOMMENDED THAT the tenders received as listed above be referred
to staff for review.
Staff have reviewed all tenders and the tendered price noted above from Kooy Brothers Lawn
Equipment is the lowest tendered price and meeting the specifications.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for this equipment acquisition is available from account 701 -11 -408.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Staff to proceed with the purchase of this equipment.
Report prepared by: Garry Misumi, extension 5293
Date: February 27, 2002
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
RES. #B20 /02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Irene Jones
THAT the Committee move into closed session.
CARRIED
ARISE FROM COMMITTE OF THE WHOLE
RES. #B21 /02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT the Committee arise and report from closed session.
CARRIED
101
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:05 a.m., on March 1, 2002.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
#PTHEE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #3/02
April 5, 2002
The Executive Committee Meeting #3/02, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office, on
Friday, April 5, 2002. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called.the meeting to order at 10:41 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Aigimeri Member
Lorna Bissell Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Irene Jones Member
Ron Moeser Member
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
REGRETS
Jim McMaster
RES. #B22 /02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Maria Augimeri
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #2/02, held on March 1, 2002, be approved.
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
Vice Chair
CARRIED
RES: #.B23 /02 - CITY OF TORONTO
Request for Permanent Easement for the installation of a hydro cable to
supply power to a flowmeter on an existing forcemain, Rouge River
Watershed, City of Toronto (East Community), CFN 32967. Receipt of a
request from the City of Toronto to provide a permanent easement for
the installation of a hydro cable to supply power to a flowmeter on an
existing forcemain, north of Sheppard Avenue East, east of Meadowvale
Road, Rouge River Watershed, City of Toronto (East Community).
103
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to
provide a permanent easement for the installation of a hydro cable to supply power to a
flowmeter on an existing forcemain, north of Sheppard Avenue East, east of Meadowvale
Road, Rouge River Watershed, City of Toronto (East Community);
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interests of TRCA in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to
cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.002 hectares, more or less, (0.005 acres) be
granted to the City of Toronto for the installation of a hydro cable to supply power to a
flowmeter on an existing forcemain, said land being Part of Lot 4, Concession 3, City of
Toronto (East Community);
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other
costs;
THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims for injuries,
damages or costs of any nature, resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from
the granting of this easement or carrying out of construction;
THAT an archaeological review is to be carried out with any mitigative measures being
carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA;
THAT the subject lands are included in a three party agreement among The Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto (now the City of Toronto), The Metropolitan Toronto Zoo (now the
Toronto Zoo) and TRCA and the granting of this easement Is subject to the approval of
the City of Toronto Parks and Recreation Department and the Toronto Zoo;
THAT said easement be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The City of Toronto has formally requested a permanent easement for the installation of a
hydro cable to supply power to a flowmeter on an existing forcemain, north of Sheppard
Avenue East, east of Meadowvale Road, Rouge River Watershed, City of Toronto (East
Community). The subject TRCA lands are outside the Regulated Area, therefore no permit is
required pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 for the construction of these proposed works.
104
The subject lands are included in a three party agreement among The Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto (now the City of Toronto), The Metropolitan Toronto Zoo (now the
Toronto Zoo) and TRCA and the granting of,this easement is subject to the approval of the City
of Toronto Parks and Recreation Department and the Toronto Zoo.
The subject lands form part of a larger acreage acquired by TRCA from Skigan Ltd. on
December 28, 1962 under the Rouge River Watershed component of the Land Acquisition
Project. The City of Toronto has conveyed lands to TRCA over the years for the nominal
consideration of $2.00 and has requested that this easement be granted for the nominal
consideration of $2.00.
A plan illustrating the proposed permanent easement location is attached.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The City of Toronto has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in
completing this transaction.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: March 18, 2002
Attachments: 1
105
Attachment 1
106
RES: #B24/02 - THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
Conveyance of Land for the Widening and Reconstruction of Rutherford
Road between Regional Road 27 and Weston Road, City of Vaughan
Humber River Watershed, CFN 33036. Receipt of a request from The
Regional Municipality of York for conveyance of land for the widening
and reconstruction of Rutherford Road between Regional Road 27 and
Weston Road, City of Vaughan.
Moved by: Michael Di Blase
Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from The Regional Municipality
of York to convey certain lands for the widening and reconstruction of Rutherford Road
between Regional Road 27 and Weston Road, City of Vaughan;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinlon''of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to
cooperate with The Regional Municipality of York in this instance;
THAT three parcels of TRCA owned land containing 0.178 hectares, more or less, (0.441
acres) be conveyed to The Regional Municipality of York for the widening and
reconstruction of Rutherford Road between Regional Road 27 and Weston Road, said
land being Part of Lots 15 and 16-and Part of the Road Allowance between Lots 15 and
16, Concession 7 and Part of Block 2, Plan 65M -3258, City of Vaughan, Regional -
Municipality of York,' designated as Parts 1, 2 and 3 on a plan of survey prepared by
Holding &•Joliet Limited under their Job No. 01- 1330 -REF4 and Part 5 on avian of
survey prepared by Holding & Jones Limited under their Job No. 01- 1330 -REF1 together
with a temporary easement -over Parts 6 and 7 on a plan of survey prepared by Holding &
Jones Limited under their Job No. 01- 1330 -REF2;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other
costs together with 'a payment of $20,830 to compensate TRCA for the Toss of rental
income on two residential rental houses on the north side of Rutherford Road between
Islington Avenue and Pine Valley Drive;
THAT an' archaeological investigation is to b'e conducted before any site disturbance with
any mitigative measures required being carried out all at the expense of The Regional
Municipality of York;
THAT The Regional Municipality of York is to fully indemnify and save harmless the
Authority from any and all claims for injuries, damages or Toss of any nature resulting in
any way either directly or indirectly from this sale or the carrying out of construction;
THAT said conveyance is subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
107
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Prior to 1991, Rutherford Road was a gravel surfaced rural road. In 1991, TRCA entered into a
land exchange with the then Town of Vaughan to allow for the upgrading and paving of
Rutherford Road to the standard it is today. Since 1991, Vaughan has also constructed a
watermain on the south side of Rutherford Road.
At TRCA meeting #4/99, held on April 30, 1999, TRCA approved the granting of permanent
and temporary easements to the Regional Municipality of York for the construction of a
watermain on the north side of Rutherford Road. It became apparent at that time that all of
these upgrades to Rutherford Road were having an impact on TRCA holdings in this area. As
part of the resolution for the watermain the following clause was included:
"THAT granting of permanent and temporary easements be subject to impacts to the
Authority's Nursery Operations and other Authority holdings being satisfactorily resolved
prior to construction being allowed to commence;"
The impacts of the construction of the watermain were dealt with through the construction
process.
The Region of York is proposing to widen and reconstruct Rutherford Road from Weston Road
to Regional Road 27. Along with technical requirement relating to the construction, staff
continue to have concerns with the impact this construction will have on our nursery operation
and our two rental homes all located on the north side of Rutherford Road. With the existing
conditions TRCA has already lost a long term tenant in one of the homes because the noise
from the traffic had become unbearable and our other tenant has also been complaining about
noise and traffic. Staff feel it will be difficult to rent the two residential rental properties once the
widening of Rutherford Road takes place. York Region has agreed to pay TRCA a lump sum
payment of $20,830 to compensate TRCA for loss of rental income as a result of the widening
of Rutherford Road. The loss in rental income payment is based on a loss of $200 per rental
unit for a 5 -year period using a 6% monthly compound interest.
Staff also feel that the proposed widening of Rutherford Road and the requirement for a shared
signalized intersection with the York Region District School Board development will have a
major impact on TRCA's nursery operation. As part of the widening and reconstruction, the
following works are being undertaken to mitigate the impacts on the nursery:
• Maintain the existing entrances (the easterly entrance will be relocated to line up with the
new signalized entrance to the York Region District School Board property on the south
side of Rutherford Road);
• Re- establish fences and lockable gates;
• locate and maintain all services;
• maintain positive drainage away from all buildings;
• compensation plantings for all removed trees;
• relocate existing entrance sign;
108
• ensure asphalt aprons up to gates;
• re -grade yard to remove hump in ground;
• re- surface existing works yard with minimum of 300mm compacted 3/4" crushed gravel.
Remove all excavated soil;
• install call -up Tight at intersection;
• maintain current parking for 35 vehicles;
• ensure 2% gradients at all entrances;
• ensure minirnum'gradients through yard.
The subject Iands'fotm part of a larger acreage acquired by TRCA from Ivy Green Homes and
Queen Gardens Holdings Inc. on November 27, 1998 and from The Corporation of the City of
Vaughan on September 20, 1991 under the Humber River Watershed component of the Land
Acquisition Project and from the Estate of A. B. Cooper on May 21, 1964 under the Boyd Dam
and Reservoir Project. The Fie'gional Municipality of York has conveyed lands to the Authority
over the years for nominal consideratioh of S2.00 and has requested that these lands be
conveyed for the nominal consideration of $2.00
In addition t� the fee simple conveyance, The Regional Municipality of York has requested to
utilize 0.138 hectares (0.340 acres) of Authority lands in this area for temporary construction
purposes. Plans illustrating both the fee simple conveyance and temporary easement
locations are attached.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Regional Municipality of York has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs
involved in completing this transaction.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Mike Fennirig, extension 5223
Date: March 21, 2002
Attachments: 3
109
Attachment 1
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
Conveyance of Land for the Widening and Reconstruction of Rutherford Road between Regional Road 27 and Weston Road, City
.p, of Vaughan
Humber River Watershed
CFN 33036
110
,,,
pw�
4wp br•,
r
!SF,
r-
sy i,�yF� `�40
A r,P OA.
A4.
e4
IC'onserMvatron
TRCA LANDS
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
111
Attachment 3
`� THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
H umbug r h River Watershed
' \ \ .` ``��^ t iis r<: `tk � r
7811:1 .,!y
/ ` j 1
** \NAV
. 0 kNt 4 4 ils:‘,14,rt _VC\ 6 ,-. _.:..........44;.#1711,.. AN 4‘k\b‘*4 1 .N.„.<•3. ifill
11.`'�•�� ��\, \ ` ,/ 1 is
4#4t001VAW4.44#4&“ '4 \-cV0' 4
Conveyance of Land for the Widening and Reconstruction of Rutherford Road between Regional Road 27 and Weston Road, ply-
411 A k4 k .1 \ NitV4 _ ..... • -_ _..,0..- -
�`� �►� `� �� ��•� . �S • ..Try �'fi+�i t3NfGtlo , la* 4►e�ls`�•�i I) k > �► �`.�►T 14_ la lgt ` `i �- ",6 ., Rug" '/
-..i*� -- ....rte n � s�'q ■N.
vs. �q� i •► � i� :��a�` +��. �_, � PROPOSED SALE •►' � `\ esr�` '..:‘,-,:to,„".......„-N ...
112
RES. #B25/02 - SUBLICENCE AGREEMENT - THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN
OF CALEDON AND THE BOLTON WANDERERS' SOCCER CLUB OF
ONTARIO
Vicinity of Glasgow Road, in the Bolton Area of the Town of Caledon
CFN 24551 and CFN 22923. Receipt of a request from The Corporation
of the Town of Caledon for consent from TRCA to enter into a sublicence
agreement With the Bolton Wanderers' Soccer Club of Ontario for a -
3 -year term With a right of renewal for a further 2 years on TRCA lands
known as Edelweiss and Jack Garrett Soccer Parks located in the vicinity
Of Glasgow Road, in the Bolton Area of the Town of Caledon.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) entered into a management agreement with the Town of
Caledon for TRCA lands known as Edelweiss Park for park and recreational activities on
January 25, 1984, with the lands being used for soccer and tennis purposes;
AND WHEREAS the Management agreement was amended on September 1, 1998 to add
TRCA lands known as Jack Garrett Soccer Park with the lands being used for soccer
purposes;
AND WHEREAS TRCA is in receipt of a request from The Corporation 'of the Town of
Caledonto enter into a sublicence agreement for a 3 -year term with a right to renew for
an additional-2 jea'rs,•commencing May 15, 2002, with the Bolton Wanderers' Soccer
Club Of O'ritario tO-deal with the use, care and administration of the soccer facilities at
Edelweiss and Jack Garrett Soccer Parks;
THAT TRCA concur with The Corporation of the Town of Caledon entering into a
sublicence agreement with the Bolton Wanderers' Soccer Club of Ontario;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 1984, the Authority entered into a management agreement with the Town of Caledon for
various parcels of TRCA lands in the Bolton area of the Town of Caledon. One of the parcels
included in this agreement was TRCA land at Edelweiss Park. Under this agreement the Town
continued the tennis court use which existed at the time the property was acquired by TRCA
and constructed soccer fields.
113
In the 1990s the Town experienced growth in the number of players participating in soccer in
Bolton and surrounding area. The Town approached TRCA for additional land to
accommodate their requirement for additional soccer fields. On September 1, 1998 TRCA
added a 6 -acre parcel of land on the north side of Glasgow Road to the existing management
agreement for use by the Town as soccer fields. This parcel has since been named the Jack
Garrett Soccer Park.
The Bolton Wanderers' Soccer Club of Ontario has been using these two soccer areas on an
informal arrangement with the Town for a number of years. Both the Town and the Club now
want to formalize their arrangement by way of a sublicence of the two properties. The
sublicence will deal with the use, care and administration of the soccer facilities and will set out
the responsibilities of both the Town and the Club relating to the two sites. All capital repairs,
improvements and expansion will still require TRCA approval.
A sketch illustrating the location of the two sites is attached.
WORK TO BE DONE
Staff will work with staff of the Town of Caledon and representative of the Bolton Wanderers'
Soccer Club of Ontario to ensure all TRCA interests are looked after in the sublicence.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Town and the Club are responsible for all realty taxes and maintenance costs associated
with these properties.
POLICY CONSIDERATION
TRCA staff has advised the Town of Caledon that the development of Edelweiss Park has
reached the maximum allowable level and that further development should be curtailed,
because of flood plain concerns and the long -term desire of TRCA to re- naturalize the area and
limit public use to trails and associated passive uses. Staff are in the early stage of discussions
concerning alternative, long -term locations.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: March 19, 2002
Attachments: 1
114
Attachment 1
115
RES. #B26/02 - FLOAT HOMES AND YEAR -ROUND LIVEABOARDS ON PUBLIC
PROPERTY
City of Toronto Waterfront. To provide a report on the City of Toronto's
policy directions on the subject of float homes and year -round
Iiveaboards on waterfront parks and recreation property and to provide
additional information as requested by the Executive Committee at its
November 2, 2001 meeting.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Lorna Bissell
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the resolutions of City of Toronto
Council on the issue of "float homes" and year -round Iiveaboards adopted at its February
13, 14 and 15, 2002 meeting and the additional information on the Nautical Village
Group's "timeshare" 1995 proposal be received;
THAT the Authority reiterate its position on "Iiveaboards" as generally adopted on March
22, 1991, to the City of Toronto as follows:
a. In negotiating new lease agreements or extensions to the current yacht club or marina
agreements due to expire in 2005, provisions be Incorporated for the prohibition of
"Iiveaboards" during the non - boating season, between haul -out and launch, and of
"grey water" discharge at anytime within small craft harbours under ownership and
management of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the City of
Toronto;
b. The City of Toronto be requested to take all reasonable steps to ensure that any
concerns of the City of Toronto Fire Department and other emergency services are
addressed for existing "liveaboard" situations on the Toronto Waterfront;
c. The City of Toronto be requested to enforce the provisions of any existing agreement
with a yacht/boat club or marina which includes a specific clause or provision
prohibiting "Iiveaboards ";
THAT the Authority support the City of Toronto's position that 'float homes be prohibited"
on the basis of their incompatibility with the goals and objectives of TRCA's - Lake
Ontario Waterfront Development Program, limiting recreational boating opportunities
along the Toronto waterfront for existing and future residents of the City of Toronto and
the Greater Toronto Area and the conflict with the 1972 Toronto/TRCA waterfront
management agreement which states that the City of Toronto will maintain the waterfront
public lands for park, recreation and conservation purposes;
THAT staff be directed to take whatever action is necessary to ensure the Authority
interests are protected in the legal proceedings and mandatory arbitration with respect to
"float homes" and to request the City of Toronto Legal Services represent the Authority in
this matter;
116
THAT staff be directed to report in future as to the conclusion of the legal proceedings
and any further actions of the City of Toronto on the "float home" or liveaboard° issue;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Toronto be so advised.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Executive Committee at Meeting #9/01 held on November 2, 2001, had before it a staff
report on the issue of "Float Homes" and "Uveaboards" and passed Resolution #B135/01:
"THAT the staff report on Policy Options, Float Homes and Year -round Liveaboards on Public
Property be tabled and brought back with additional background information."
In late 1995 and early 1996, the Nautical Village Group (NVG) approached Metro Toronto,
Scarborough and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) with a proposal to
moor 26 floating chalets as a time share condominium resort at Bluffer's Park Marina. The NVG
presented their concept and addressed comments /concems raised at a public 'meeting held
on January 29, 1996. NVG did not pursue the proposal any further.
The Authority was in receipt of a report dated October 2, 2001 to the Scarborough, Toronto
'East York and Etobicoke Community Councils from Joe Halstead, Commissioner, Economic
Development, Culture and Tourism on the subject of 'Float Homes and Year -Round
Liveaboards on Parks and Recreation Property Various .Wards.'
The Toronto staff report dated October 2, 2001 and the recommendations were considered at
the respective Community Council meetings during the week of October 22, 2001. In the
Toronto staff report and recommendations, TRCA was requested to provide any comments on
this waterfront issue to the joint meeting of the Economic Development and Parks Committee
and Planning and Transportation Committee to be held on November 15, 2001. Authority staff
did provide a copy of the November 2, 2001 Executive Committee staff report and the
Executive Committee resolution that this matter be deferred pending additional information.
Staff also attended the joint Committee meeting.
The following provides a historical review of waterfront planning and our position on the matter
of "Liveaboards and Float Homes ". The 1967 Metropolitan Toronto Planning Board Waterfront
Plan had a vision which projected a return to the lake, back to the vast park and recreational
opportunities which lay at the doorstep of a bustling and expanding metropolitan region. On
November 23; 1970, the Ministry of the Environment designated the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority as the implementing agency for the Waterfront Plan for all sectors in
which it had jurisdiction except the central harbour.
The Lake Ontario Waterfront Development Program 1980 as updated in 1986, has as its goal:
"To create a handsome waterfront, balanced in its land uses, which will compliment
adjacent areas, taking cognizance of existing residential development and making
accessible, wherever possible, features which warrant public use."
The Lake Ontario Waterfront program objectives which are relevant to the issues of this report
are as follows:
117
a) to provide open space areas at regular intervals across the waterfront through
acquisition, land creation and /or agreements with other agencies;
b) to regularly review and update a long -term Waterfront Plan and to prepare and
implement Concept Plans for specific waterfront areas which will ensure:
i. the protection and enhancement of environmentally significant areas, heritage
resources and wildlife and fisheries habitat;
ii. the provision of regional access and facilities for water oriented recreation;
iii. the linking of specific areas both along the shoreline and with valleyland open
space corridors;
iv. consultation with the relevant funding and approval agencies and with public
interest groups.
The Lake Ontario Waterfront Program also provides the following key principles in terms of
recreational uses:
a) Recreational facilities both of an active and passive nature, will be provided in
accordance with approved Master Plans, making every attempt to provide winter as well
as summer use of the public land base which has been established.
b) The Authority recognizes the suitability of the Lake Ontario shoreline for recreational
boating and the increasing demand for boating facilities to serve community, club and
individual needs. This Program makes provision for boating facilities serving these
needs in the safe harbour areas to be created along the Lake Ontario shoreline.
c) The Authority recognizes the importance of improving the sport fishery along the Lake
Ontario shoreline and will cooperate to provide suitable habitats for a variety of fish
species and improved accessibility to the lake for fishing.
In 1972, the Authority entered into the Waterfront Management Agreement with the Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto (now the City of Toronto) for the management and operations of the
waterfront lands in the ownership of TRCA. In the agreement, it states that "Metro (now City of
Toronto) will maintain the said lands for park, recreation and conservation purposes with the
necessary administration and supervision accommodation in connection with and /or no other
purposes except with the approval in writing of the Authority ".
In response to a request from The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto (now City of Toronto) to
provide comments on "liveaboards ", the Authority adopted the following resolution at its March
22, 1991 meeting:
118
"THAT Metropolitan Toronto, in negotiating new lease agreements, make provisions for
the prohibition of "liveaboards" during the non - boating season, between haul -out and
launch, and of "grey water' discharge within small craft harbours under ownership and
management of Metropolitan Toronto and The Metropolitan Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority;
THAT Metropolitan Toronto be requested to take all reasonable steps to ensure that the
concerns of the Scarborough, Toronto and Etobicoke Fire Departments are addressed
for existing ° liveabooards" situations on the Metropolitan waterfront;
THAT the Metropolitan Toronto Parks, Recreation and Property Committee be requested
to forward a copy of all agency reports on this matter, as well as the Metropolitan
Toronto report, to all clubs and marinas and invite them to the appropriate Committee
meeting on this matter;
AND FURTHER THAT the comments be forwarded to the Metropolitan Toronto Parks and
Recreation and Property Committee, Metropolitan Toronto Planning Department,
Metropolitan Toronto Waterfront Committee, the City of Scarborough Waterfront
Committee, the City of Toronto Waterfront Committee, City of Etobicoke Waterfront
Committee, and the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront. °
In terms of life and fire safety, the report by the Scarborough Fire Department in 1990 outlined
the following safety concerns for the Scarborough Bluffs shoreline for yacht clubs and marinas:
• emergency telephone access;
' • improved Water supply for fire fighting;
• placement of fire extinguishers;
• improved year - round access for emergency vehicles;
• preparation of fire safety plans;
• inspection of "liveaboards ";
• adequacy of on -board sanitation services and access to pump out services.
Additional concerns were raised by the International Joint Commission over the need to
regulate "grey water" discharge from recreational boats.
In consideration of the lease in 1996 with the Lakeshore Yacht Club (Tenant), the Municipality
, of Metropolitan Toronto (now City of Toronto - landlord) and the Metropolitan Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority (Authority), the following clause was included dealing with the
issue of "liveaboards ":
• The Tenant covenants that no liveaboards on watercraft in or out of the water will be
permitted during the period between December 1st and March 31st in each year.
119
All leases with yacht clubs or marinas have provisions that relate to site development
proceeding in accordance with a Master Plan appended to the lease. Specific architectural
plans and other site works in accordance with any Master Plan requires the approval of the
Commissioner of Parks at the City of Toronto and the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) of
TRCA. The lease with Hydrus Enterprises Inc. (Bluffers Park Marina) for the period of August
1980 to April 2012, incorporates the following specific provisions related to site development:
• To undertake site development in accordance with a phasing schedule approved by the
Commissioner and CAO of the Authority and to construct the marina facilities in conformity
with the Master Plan.
• Not to erect buildings or other structures on the lands except in accordance with the Master
Plan and in accordance with design and architectural plans approved by the Commissioner
and CAO of the Authority.
• To use the lands only for the purposes of a Public Marina which includes all activities
commonly found in this type of facility and including food and beverage services.
The TRCA received an application for a permit dated May 17, 2000 from Bluffers Park Marina to
alter the docking layout in the Master Plan for the construction of a new dock along the western
shoreline north of the marina building to accommodate approximately 20 -25 float homes. A
permit is required under Ontario Regulation 158 (Fill, Construction and Alteration to
Waterways) including Federal fisheries approval under the Level 3 Agreement between
Conservation Authorities and DFO. This permit application was not processed as the new
dock and the revision to the master plan required approval of the City of Toronto under the
terms and conditions of the lease. By letter dated March 7, 2002, the City of Toronto advised
TRCA that City approval would not be given noting Council's recent direction to prohibit "float
homes ". Authority staff is also of the opinion that private residential accommodations (i.e. Float
homes) in Bluffer's Park is not consistent with the goal and objectives of the Lake Ontario
Waterfront Program and the 1972 Waterfront Agreement with the City.
City Council, at its meeting held on February 13, 14 and 15, 2002, had before it, Clause No. 1
contained in Joint Report No. 1 of The Planning and Transportation Committee and The
Economic Development and Parks Committee, headed "Float Homes and Year -Round
Liveaboards on Parks and Recreation Property ".
Council amended this Clause by deleting Recommendation No. (8) of the joint Planning and
Transportation and Economic Development and Parks Committees and inserting in lieu thereof
the following:
"(8)
(a) Recommendation No. (1) of the further recommendations of the Joint Planning
and Transportation and Economic Development and Parks Committees, as
embodied in the confidential communication dated November 20, 2001, from the
City Clerk, Planning and Transportation Committee, to City Council, be struck out
and replaced with the following:
120
'(1) that the Acting City Solicitor be directed to commence such legal action
as deemed appropriate to seek an interpretation of the lease among the
City, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Bluffer's Park
Marina Limited to determine whether the lease permits the use of-the
leased property for residential or related purposes, including float homes
and Iiveaboards, and to seek an injunction to prevent any additional float
homes at Bluffer's Park Marina until after such legal action has been
concluded, and further, that the Acting City Solicitor be directed to take
no action to implement any court decision against float home owners or
Iiveaboards until after the results of such legal action have been reported
to City Council;'; and
(b) Recommendation No. (2) of the further recommendations of the Joint Planning
and Transportation and Economic Development and Parks Committees; as
embodied in such communication, be adopted, such recommendation to remain
confidential, in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Act, having
regard that it contains information which is subject to Solicitor /Client privilege. ")
"The Joint Planning and Transportation and Economic Development and Parks Committee
recommends that:
(1), float homes be prohibited on City of Toronto Parks and Recreation property, and that
the City Solicitor be instructed to give effect thereto;
(2) the concept of a license fee for Iiveaboards (as opposed to floating homes) use of boats
at all City of Toronto owned facilities be approved in principle and that the
Commissioner of Economic Development Culture and Tourism and the Acting Chief
Financial Officer be requested to report further on the implementation of a license fee
for liveaboard boats including appropriate fees, collecting methods, and required legal
authorities;
(3)
in the event that Council adopts a policy to permit a percentage of Iiveaboards (as
opposed to float homes), staff be requested to canvas Boat Clubs for their interest in
being allowed to accommodate Iiveaboards at their locations, and that an initial
assessment of infrastructure and life safety requirements be conducted at those
locations which request consideration to determine the appropriateness of such
requests, and that the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism
be requested to report further on the outcome;
(4) City Council's' decision with respect to this matter be forwarded to the Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority for their information and consent as appropriate;
(5) the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism be requested to
consult with the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services, the Commissioner of
Urban Development Services, the Chief of Police, and the Chief Administrative Officer of
the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to determine the minimum
infrastructure, emergency services, and landscaping requirements for float homes
and /or year round Iiveaboards on Parks and Recreation Property;
121
(6) the Government of Canada be requested to include float homes as part of the
prescribed class of floating objects deemed not to be a vessel under Bill C -14 (the
Canada Shipping Act, 2001), if the Bill is passed by the Senate and given Royal Assent;
(7)
(8)
the Government of Ontario be requested to address year -round residence on moored
boats as part of the Property Tax Classification Review and any other applicable
legislative or regulatory review, and consider developing standards for Ontario float
homes; and
the further recommendations of the Joint Planning and Transportation and Economic
Development and Parks Committee contained in the confidential communication dated
November 20, 2001, from the City Clerk, Planning and Transportation Committee be
adopted, and that, in accordance with the Municipal Act, discussions pertaining to this
matter be held in camera having regard that the subject matter involves receiving
advice that is subject to solicitor - client privilege.
The Authority is in receipt of correspondence from City of Toronto - Legal Services re: Bluffer's
Park Marina that Council has instructed that legal proceedings commence seeking
interpretation of the lease to determine whether it permits the year -round use of the leased
property for residential or related purposes, including float homes and liveaboards. It is noted
that the City's position will be that such uses are not permitted.
City Legal notes that the lease contains a mandatory arbitration clause. The City has asked
what role the Authority will play in this matter as we are a party to the lease.
RATIONALE
The additional information on the Nautical Village Group noted that the "timeshare" proposal
did not proceed. This information does not change the recommendations of this report.
For "liveaboards" it is recommended from TRCA's perspective , that the City consider a
prohibition during the non - boating season and of "grey water" discharge at anytime within
small craft harbours under the ownership and management of the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority and the City of Toronto. With the existing "liveaboards ", steps should
be taken to ensure all life and safety issues are addressed. In the case of the Lakeshore Yacht
Club Lease (Colonel Samuel Smith Park), the City of Toronto should be requested to enforce
the lease provision of prohibiting "liveaboards" during the non - boating season. It should be
noted that "liveaboards" do not limit the recreational boating opportunities provided or to be
provided on the Toronto waterfront. After the legal action on the "use of the leased property for
residential or related purposes, including float homes and liveaboards ", Council may consider
the concept of a license fee for liveaboards and a policy to permit a percentage of liveaboards.
Further reporting on this issue is required.
122
The issue of "Float Homes" is significantly different. From our review, Float homes are: a)
inconsistent with the goals and objectives of TRCA's - Lake Ontario Waterfront Program; b) a
limiting factor in meeting the recreational boating demand along Toronto's waterfront for an
increasing population in the Toronto /Greater Toronto Area; c) in direct conflict with the 1972
Toronto/TRCA waterfront agreement which states that "the City of Toronto will maintain the
waterfront public lands for park, recreation and conservation purposes with the necessary
administration -and supervisory accommodation in connection therewith and for no other
purpose except with the approval in writing of the Authority." Its recommended that the
Authority support Council's direction that "Float homes be prohibited."
On the correspondence from City Legal, it is recommended that the Authority as a party to the
lease, participate in the "mandatory arbitration" and legal proceedings and request the City of
Toronto Legal Services to represent the Authority in this matter.
WORK TO BE DONE
Staff will report back to the Authority on the outcome of the legal action and any subsequent
actions of the City on the "float homes" or "liveaboards" issue.
For Information contact: Larry Field, extension 5243
Date: March 25, 2002
RES. #B27/02 - EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE DREDGING ASHBRIDGE'S BAY PARK,
COATSWORTH CUT DREDGING
Award of Contract ES02 -07 to the Toronto Port Authority for emergency
maintenance dredging of the navigation channel at Coatsworth Cut,
Ashbridge's Bay Park, in the City of Toronto.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Contract ES02 -07 be awarded to the
Toronto Port Autliolrity for emergency maintenance dredging at Coatsworth Cut,
Ashbridge's Bay Park, In the City of Toronto, for a total estimated upset cost of $258,000,
including all applicable taxes.
CARRIED
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The total estimated in -situ volume of sediment to be removed is 5,300 cubic metres. The
material will be dredged and loaded into dump scows using the Toronto Port Authority derrick
and hauled to the endikement cells at Leslie Street for disposal.
The total estimated cost includes $208,000 for dredging and $50,000 for tipping fees for
disposal at Leslie Street Spit.
123
RATIONALE
Initial discussions with the Toronto Port Authority indicated that due to equipment repairs and
commitments to other dredging work would delay the start of work until the end of March. As a
result we have obtained a one month extension for in water work in order to complete the
required dredging work prior to the upcoming boating season. It is recommended that the Port
Authority be awarded Contract ES02 -07 for the emergency maintenance dredging at
Coatsworth Cut for a total estimated upset cost of $258,000 including all applicable taxes.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding is available under Account # 211 -16.
Report prepared by: Mark Preston, 416 - 392 -9722
For Information contact: Jim Berry 416 - 392 -9721
Date: March 22, 2002
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES. #B28/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.1 - 8.1.21, and 8.1.30 - 8.1.31, with the exception of 8.1.6 - City of Toronto), which are
listed below.
CARRIED
124
RES. #B29/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
8.1.6 - City of Toronto
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Maria Augimeri
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application
8.1.6 - City of Toronto, which is listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.1 CASA NORTH DEVELOPMENTS INC.
To alter a waterway on Lot 12, 13, Concession 6, in the City of Brampton, Humber
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Casa North Developments
Inc..
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and the placement of fill and associated site grading
within a Regulated Area of the Humber River, to facilitate the construction of a stormsewer
outfall and associated works to service a plan of subdivision..
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2007 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing Nos. 75 (SWM Facility), 76 (Storm Sewer Outfall to SWM Facility), 77 (1500
Diaineter By -Pass Pipe), 80 (SWM Outfall Sections & Details), 84 ( Outfall Details) and
85 (Sediment Control Plan), prepared by RAND Engineering Corporation, Project
99522 -2, dated May 2001.
• Drawing Nos. SWM -1 ( Stormwater Management Pond Planting Plan); SWM -2
( Stormwater Management Pond Soil & Seeding Plan); and SWM -3 (Stormwater
Management Details), prepared by The MBTW Group, Project MET -644, dated
September 17th, 2001 revised to February 21, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a stormwater management pohd and associated storm outfall
channel to a tributary watercourse of the Humber River, to facilitate the development of Plan of
Subdivision 21T- 92025B, in the City of Brampton's Springdale Community. The stormwater
management pond is to be situated on the adjacent tableland and incorporates a minimum
10m setback from the top -of -bank. The associated outfall structure is located within the valley
corridor and consists of a outfall headwall, plunge pool and low flow channel which will merge
with the tributary.
Control of Flooding:
The stormwater outfall structure will maintain existing grades within the Regional Storm
Floodplain and therefore, the proposal will have no impact on the control of flooding.
125
Pollution:
Detailed sediment control plans have been included in the submission to prevent sediment
from entering the watercourse and valley corridor.
Conservation of Land:
Detailed landscaping, restoration and planting enhancement plans have been prepared to
restore all disturbed areas upon completion of construction. Works will conform to the
coldwater fisheries construction timing guidelines which require construction from the period
June 15th to September 15th.
Policy Guidelines:
The works conform to provisions under Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management program policies.
CFN: 32523
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: August 16, 2001
Application #: 254 /01 /BRAM
8.1.2 ENBRIDGE CONSUMERS GAS
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on, (Street A (1 street north of
Ebenezer) west of the Gore Road), in the City of Brampton, Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton.
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a regulated area to facilitate a gas main crossing
the Humber River by directional bore method.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan prepared by Enbridge Consumers Gas, Drawing No. 20- 7680 -02, dated January
15, 2002, approved February 1, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a regulated area to facilitate a gas main crossing
the Humber River by directional bore method. The gas main will be installed a minimum of 1.5
metres beneath the watercourse
Control of Flooding:
Excavated material will be stockpiled beyond the Regional Floodplain and all existing grades
will be maintained. The proposed works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood
waters.
126
Pollution:
Silt fencing will encircle the bore pits to impede the overland migration of construction
generated sediments.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no in- stream works and no impact to riparian vegetation. Sediment fencing will
be erected at the bore.pit locations and all disturbed areas will be revegetated following
construction. There are no fisheries concerns or geotechnical issues related to this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32960 Application #: 068 /02 /BRAM
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: February 15, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)
8.1.3 CITY OF TORONTO
To place fill within a regulated area on (Martin Grove Road between Rexdale
Boulevard and Finch Avenue West), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community
Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City
of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of the
Martin Grove Road bridge over the West Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Martin Grove Road Over The West Branch Of The Humber River Structure
Rehabilitation, General Arrangement, Drawing No. 629- S3029 -18, Sheet No. 1,
prepared by McCormick Rankin Corporation, dated November 2001, date received
February 13, 2002.
• Information to Tenderers & Special Specifications (Selected Excerpts), prepared by
McCormick Rankin Corporation, date received February 13, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
127
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of. the
Martin Grove Road bridge over the West Humber River. The works include the removal and
the replacement of the bridge deck, the expansion joints at the piers and abutments, the
sidewalks and railings, and reconstruction of the wingwalls. No instream works will occur.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood water as no importation of fill will
occur. Construction debris will be removed from the valley lands.
Pollution:
Sediment control fences will be installed and maintained during the construction project to
prevent the migration of sediment into the West Humber River.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features and all disturbed
areas will be restored. There will be no vehicle access to the valley lands and there will be no
instream works. There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32950
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 14, 2002
Application #: 062/02/TOR
8.1.4 CITY OF TORONTO
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Concession B Block 4, Plan 2100,
(Bloor Street, east of Islington Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke
Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property
owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of the
Bloor Street bridge over Mimico Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Key Plan showing the location of the bridge site.
• Bloor Street Bridge Over Mimico Creek Bridge Rehabilitation, General Arrangement,
Drawing No. 53 -S- 336 -23, Sheet No. 4, prepared by SNC Lavalin, dated February 2002,
date received February 11, 2002.
• Bloor Street West, Plan Number L- 135 -79, dated May 1, 2001, and Bloor Street West,
Plan Number L- 135 -80, dated May 7, 2001, prepared by the City of Toronto Works &
Emergency Services, Technical Services, date received February 11, 2002.
128
• Schedule "A ", Information for Tenderers, Contract No. 02- FS -15S, submitted by SNC
L- avalin, date received February 11, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of the
Bloor Street bridge over Mimico Creek. The works include complete deck replacement,
substructure repair, street lighting relocation, bearing replacement and expansion joint
•elimination at abutments, and minor recoating of existing steel girders. No instream works will
occur.
Control.of Flooding:
The works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood water as no importation of fill will
occur. Construction debris will be removed from the valley lands.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during the
construction project to prevent the migration of construction generated debris into Mimico
Creek through the use of silt fences and a debris platform installed beneath the bridge.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features and all disturbed
areas will be restored. There will be no vehicle access to the valley lands and there will be no
instrearn works. There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32951
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 14, 2002
8.1.5 CITY OF TORONTO
Application #: 065 /02/TOR
To place fill within a regulated area on, (Queensway Bridge, west of Park Lawn
Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Mimico Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of the
Queensway Avenue bridge over Mimico Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
129
• The Queensway Bridge Over Mimico Creek Structure Rehabilitation, General
Arrangement, Drawing No. 022 -S- 245 -16, Sheet No. 7, prepared by LEA Consulting
Engineers, dated February 2002, date received February 18, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of the
Queensway Avenue bridge over Mimico Creek. The works include patch, waterproof and pave
repair, conversion to semi - integral abutment details, installing an approach slab, installing steel
girder diaphragms for jacking for bearing replacement, and replacing the barrier system. No
instream works will occur.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood water as no importation of fill will
occur. Construction debris will be removed from the valley lands.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during the
construction project to prevent the migration of construction generated debris into Mimico
Creek through the installation of silt fences and the use of a debris platform suspended from
the bridge .
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features and all disturbed
areas will be restored. Access to the valley lands will be gained by utilizing Hydro One's
access road in the south -east quadrant of the bridge and will be kept to a minimum. All
disturbed areas will be restored to original or better conditions. There are no geotechnical or
fisheries issues related to the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32953
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 18, 2002
130
Application #: 074/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO (HUMBER YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)
8.1.6 CITY OF TORONTO
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on, (Trethewey Drive,
east of Black Creek Drive), in the City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council
Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of
Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of the
Trethewey Drive bridge over Black Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan and Bridge Rehabilitation Construction Drawings, Drawing No.
701 -TS- 564 -1, Sheet Nos. 1, 2; 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, prepared by UMA Engineering Ltd.,
date received February 6, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of the
Trethewey Drive bridge over Black Creek. The works include the removal and replacement of
the sidewalks, bridge abutments, approach slabs, bridge deck, parapet walls, and guide rails.
No instream works will occur.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood water as no importation of fill will
occur. Construction debris will be removed from the valley lands.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be installed to prevent migration of sediment into Black Creek
and debris platforms will be temporarily installed beneath the bridge decking.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features and all disturbed
areas will be restored. There w II be no vehicle access to the valley lands and there are no
geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32949
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 14, 2002
131
Application #: 061/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO (MIDTOWN COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)
8.1.7 CITY OF TORONTO
To place fill within a regulated area on, (Don Mills Road, north of York Mills Road), in
the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of the
Don Mills Road bridge over the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Don Mills Road Bridge Over Don River, North of York Mills, Structure Rehabilitation,
General Arrangement, Drawing No. 201- S436 -20, Sheet No. 8, prepared by URS Cole
Sherman, dated January 2002, date received February 7, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of the
Don Mills Road bridge over the Don River. The works include the widening of the bridge on
both sides by 0.325 metres and removal and replacement of the bridge deck and sidewalks.
No instream works will occur.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood water as no importation of fill will
occur. Construction debris will be removed from the valley lands.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during the
construction project to prevent the migration of construction generated debris into the Don
River through the use of a debris platform suspended from the bridge.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features and all disturbed
areas will be restored. There will be no vehicle access to the valley lands and there will be no
instream works. There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
132
CFN: 32894
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 5, 2002
Application #: 057/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)
8.1.8 NAOMI COHEN
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Block E, Plan 2456, (210 Sandringham
Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Naomi Cohen.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a 30
sq. m. cabana and to undertake some landscaping works in the rear yard.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Rear Landscape Plan, Drawing No. L2, prepared by Climans Green Liang Architects
Inc., revision date December 20, 2001, date received January 22, 2002.
• Site /Grading Plan, prepared by Climans Green Liang Architects Inc., revision date
October 23, 2001, date received November 8, 2001.
• Armour Stone Terraced Planter Details, Section A -A, prepared by L. Marton
Landscape Architect, date received January 24, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a
30 sq. m. cabana built on piers, and to undertake some landscaping works in the rear yard. A
ravine feature traverses the rear northerly portion of the lot, which slopes downwards towards
Westgate Boulevard. The lot has previously been developed and experienced regrading and
landscaping works, with the proposed new works resulting in an improvement to the site
conditions. The house Which was situated on the front portion of the lot, being located outside
of the regulated area, was recently demolished and a new residence is currently under
construction as well as .a new inground pool.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm flood plain, therefore there will be
no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from these works as they are located approximately 700 metres
from the Don River.
133
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are situated within a previously disturbed area of the property and are
consistent with existing development within the corridor reach. The project will not impact on
any significant resource features and there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues
associated with the proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32663
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: November 12, 2001
Application #: 346/01/TOR
8.1.9 WESTMINSTER CEMETERY LTD.
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 22, Concession 11, (5830 Bathurst
Street), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Westminster Cemetery Ltd..
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Don River in order to
facilitate the construction of 6 new private estate mausoleums.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Key Plan and RED -LINE REVISED Site Plan Number M0223, prepared by Martin
Frenette Architect, dated March 18, 2002, received March 22, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Don River in order to
facilitate the construction of 6 new private estate mausoleums in order to expand the existing
cemetery use. The proposed works will take place on tableland, a minimum of 5 metres from
the top of bank of the valley slope and 130 meters from the watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
As the proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm fioodplain, there will be no
affect on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be installed and maintained during construction to impede the overland
migration of construction generated sediment into the Don River, located approximately 130
metres distance from the site.
134
Conservation of Land:
The proposed mausoleums will maintain a minimum 5 metres from the top of bank of the
gently rolling valley slope, while some of the existing cemetery structures are situated along the
top of bank. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor
reach and are not expected to impact on any significant resource features. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32952
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February'14, 2002
Application #: 064/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)
8.1.10 ANITRA LEKSERS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Plan M -350, (1 Larwood Boulevard),
in the City 6f Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront
Watershed as located on the property owned by Anitra Leksers.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Lake Ontario Waterfront to
make improvements to the existing residence on the subject lands.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accdrdance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Survey, RED-LINE REVISED Site Plan, Basement and Ground Floor Plans,
Axonometric Views, submitted by the applicant, date received March 5, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Lake Ontario Waterfront to
facilitate the demolition of a 2 car garage with living quarters above and construct a small
addition onto the east side of the residence in its place. In addition, the applicant proposes to
•construct a new attached 2 car garage on the north side of the home, and a new in- ground
swimming pool and hot tub in the side yard. The proposed works are sufficiently set -back from
the Lake Ontario Shoreline and associated slope hazards.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within a floodplain area, and therefore will not affect the
conveyance or storage of floodwaters.
135
Pollution:
Erosion control methods (silt fence) will be installed and maintained during the construction
process.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features, will maintain existing
grades, and is consistent with existing uses on the property. There are no geotechnical /slope
stability issues associated with this project and TRCA technical staff have determined the
replacement structure will reduce the load on the shoreline slope.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.- Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32888
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: March 20, 2002
Application #: 052/02/TOR
8.1.11 CENTENNIAL COLLEGE
To place fill within a regulated area on the north -east corner of Ellesmere Road and
Morningside Avenue, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council
Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Centennial
College.
The purpose is to Place fill and associated site grading within a Regulated Area of Highland
Creek to facilitate the construction of a major expansion on the University of Toronto
(Scarborough Campus) lands.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Drawing A1.01, prepared by Kuwabara, Payne, McKenna, Blumberg
Architects, dated August 2001, revised to March 7, 2002.
• Site Servicing and Grading Plan, Drawing G1, prepared by G &M Technical Services
Limited, dated February 2002, revised to March 7, 2002.
• Landscape Plan, Drawing L1.00, prepared by NAK Design Group, dated March 7,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
136
Proposal,:
The proposal is to place fill and to conduct associated site grading to facilitate construction of
large classroom building as part of a major expansion to the Centennial College campus. The
lands are located adjacent to a disturbed remnant slope feature associated with the Highland
Creek valley which is displaced from the natural valleylands by Morningside Avenue, Ellesmere
Road and existing high -rise residential and commercial development opposite the site. The
works include construction of a multi -story building, parking, roadways, open space amenity
areas and associated services, to be located at the toe of the remnant slope feature. The
application has been reviewed in conjunction with City of Toronto Site Plan application #SPC
2001 0029.
Control of Flooding:
The lands are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Highland Creek and will
therefore not affect the control of flooding.
Pollution:
The applicants have prepared an enhanced stormwater management plan in conjunction with
the landscape and site plan design to mitigate stormwater runoff from the site. A TRCA permit
(C- 01243) has previously been issued for the purpose of fill placement and grading for site
decommissioning purposes. Detailed sediment and erosion controls will be implemented as
required by the City of Toronto as the subject lands are not immediately adjacent to the main
Highland Creek valley.
Conservation of Land:
In conjunction with the Site Plan review, the applicants have prepared detailed landscape
restoration and enhancement plans for the remnant slope feature. Detailed geotechnical
reports have been prepared to the satisfaction of staff confirming no slope stability hazards.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2 - New Development, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 32797
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: January 11, 2002
Application #: 021/02/TOR
8.1.12 CITY OF TORONTO
To'place fill within a regulated area on Lot 22, Concession 3 Lot 2, Plan 3423,
(Sheppard Bridge, east of McCowan Road), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough
Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property
owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of the
Sheppard Avenue bridge over Highland Creek.
137
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Sheppard Avenue Bridge Over Highland Creek Construction Drawings, Drawing Nos.
265 -TS- 528 -1, Sheet 1, 265 -TS- 528 -2, Sheet 2, 265 -TS- 528 -3, Sheet 3, 265 -TS- 528 -4,
Sheet 4, 265 -S- 528 -10, Sheet 5, 265 -S- 528 -11, Sheet 6, and 265 -S- 528 -12, Sheet 7,
prepared by Ha!sail Engineers, Consultants, dated January 2002, date received
February 15, 2002.
• City of Toronto Transport Services, Standard Construction Specifications, TS 577,
Construction Specification for Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures,
dated June 2001, date received February 15, 2002.
• Schedule "B ", Special Specifications, Contract No. 02FS -13S, Sediment Control
System, prepared by City of Toronto, dated February 6, 2002, date received February
15, 2002.
• Schedule "A ", Information for Tenderers, Contract No. 02FS -13S, Working Over and
Around Highland Creek, dated February 6, 2002, date received February 15, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the rehabilitation of the
Sheppard Avenue bridge over Highland Creek. The channel is concrete lined in this reach,
with existing gabion retaining walls supporting the valley slope at all four quadrants. The works
include the removal and replacement of the bridge decking, sidewalks and parapet walls,
construction of new concrete curbs, repairs to soffit and substructure, and replacement of the
gabion retaining walls. No instream works will occur.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood water as no importation of fill will
occur. Construction debris will be removed from the valley lands.
Pollution:
Sediment control fences will be installed and maintained during the construction project to
prevent the migration of construction generated debris into Highland Creek.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features and all disturbed
areas will be restored. There will be no vehicle access to the valley lands and there will be no
instream works. There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
138
CFN: 32954
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February ' 18, 2002
Application #: 075/02/TOR
8.1.13 JENNY YUE
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 29, Plan 1079, (49 Presley Avenue),
in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Jenny Yue.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Don River to facilitate the
construction of a garden shed and undertake minor landscaping works. The proposed shed is
set -back a minimum distance of 7 meters from the stable top of bank.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Survey, North Elevation, South Elevation, and Site Plan, submitted by applicant, date
received March 4, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Don River in order to
facilitate the construction of a garden shed, and undertake minor landscaping works
approximately 220 meters from the watercourse. The proposed works will maintain a distance
of 7 meters from the top of bank area and will be further enhanced with additional plantings.
The rear portion of the property will be left to naturalize once complete.
' Control of Floodinq: .
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm floodplain, therefore there will be
no affect on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
No sedimentation of the watercourse is expected from the proposed works as they are located
approximately 220 meters from the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed garden shed and landscaping works will maintain a minimum distance of 7
meters-from the top of bartk of the valley slope, this is a greater distance than the structures
located on neighboring properties. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated
with the project. The rear portion of the property will be left to re- naturalize.
139
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.E - Property Improvement and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33002
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
Date: March 10, 2002
Application #: 099/02/TOR
8.1.14 NEIL & TRACEY MANNE
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 86, 87, 88, Plan 284, (223 Rouge Hills
Drive), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Rouge River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Neil & Tracey Manne.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Rouge River to facilitate the
replacement of an existing single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2002 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -lined Site Plan, Survey, Basement, First Floor, Second Floor and Roof Plan,
North, South, East and West Elevations, and Building Section, prepared by Oksanen
and Associates, dated February 2002, received Feb 21, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is located adjacent the Rouge Marsh, near the mouth of the Rouge River,
and is located partially within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposal is to excavate and place fill in
a regulated area to facilitate the demolition of the existing single family dwelling in order to
construct a new residence which will be situated closer to the street and further from the valley
slope. The new residence is located outside of the regulated area.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm floodplain, therefore there will
be no affect on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the proposed works and the top of bank in order to
prevent sedimentation of the watercourse which is located approximately 45 metres away.
Conservation of Land:
The existing house is situated a minimum of 3 metres from the top of bank of the valley slope
while the new house will maintain a minimum 9 metres from the top of bank. The proposed
works will not impact on any significant resource features and there are no geotechical /slope
stability issues related to the project.
140
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. D. - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32989
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 28, 2002
TOWN OF CALEDON
Application #: 093/02/TOR
8.1.15 JOHN MILLIGAN
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 27, Concession 6 Lot 27, Plan 43R -6484,
(17284 Highway 50), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located
on the property owned by John Milligan.
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area, to facilitate the replacement of an existing septic
system within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, with a new septic system to be located outside
ofthe Regional Storm Flood Plain.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
Plan, dated March 13, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The-pr000sal is to remove an existing septic system in ill- repair, and install a new septic
system n order to service an existing dwelling. The existing septic system is located on
Authority owned larids, under a License Agreement, and is within the Regional Storm Flood
- Plain' of the Humber River: The new septic system will be located just north of the existing
system, outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and not on Authority owned lands. In
addition, the applicant has received funding for his proposal from the Rural Clean Water
Program, and has been working with the Authority's Environmental Services Staff to implement
his proposal. In consideration of water quality, the project has proceeded as emergency
works.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed new septic system is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the
Humber River, and therefore is not expected to affect the storage or conveyance of flood
waters.
141
Pollution:
The proposed works are located more than 65 metres from the adjacent watercourse, and are
therefore not expected to cause sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not affect any significant features, as no geotechnical, fisheries, or
natural heritage issues are associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33019
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: March 14, 2002
Application #: 107/02 /CAL
8.1.16 TONY VENTURO
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Concession
7 Part Lot 176, Block 1, Plan BOL -7, (57 David Street), in the Town of Caledon,
Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Tony Venturo.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a
single - family residence and to undertake associated landscaping and grading works within the
Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River and within the Bolton Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Basement Plan, Main Floor Plan, 2nd Floor Plan, Roof & Drainage Plan,
Front (East) Elevation, Rear (West) Elevation, North Elevation, South Elevation, and
Section, Drawing Nos. Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10, submitted by applicant,
dated February 28, 2002, date received March 5, 2002.
• Letter of Intent, dated November 2, 2001 prepared by Ireland Engineering Associates
Ltd. confirming that the proposed new house can withstand the depths and velocities
expected during a Regional Storm Event.
• Letter of Undertaking, dated September 24, 2001, prepared by the applicant, stating
that all excess fill will be removed from the site.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a
single - family residence and to undertake associated landscaping and grading works within the
Regional Storm flood plain of the Humber River and within the Bolton Special Policy Area.
142
Control of Flooding:
The new house will be dry- floodproofed to above the 350 Year Flood elevation and will be
constructed to withstand the depths and velocities expected under the Regional Storm Flood
event. All excess fill material will be removed from the site.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from these works as they are located more than 200 metres from
the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed house is located within the historic village of Bolton, located within the Regional
Storm flood plain and the SPA. There are no significant resource features on the site and there
are no geotechnical /slope stability issues related to the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's`Valley acid Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32463 •
Report Prepared by. Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 25, 2001
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 240 /01 /CAL
8.1.17 MARKHAVEN' INC. LONG TERM CARE FACILITY
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 13, Concession 8, (54 Parkway Avenue), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by
MarkhaVerr Inc. Long Term Care Facility.
The purpose is to demolish the existing 75 bed Markhaven Long Term Care Facility and
construct anew 96 bed retirement home, partially within the Regional Storm flood plain of the
Exhibition Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of to in accordance with the following documents and
plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan's pretiared by Salter Farrow Pilon Architects Inc., Project 9867, Drawings Al, A2,
and A3; Revision 3 dated February 7, 2002; received February 22, 2002.
• Landscape Plan prepared by Schollen & Company Inc., Project 9867, Drawing L7,
Revision 6 dated February 7, 2002; received February 22, 2002.
• Storm Water Management & Site Grading Plan prepared by Ainley & Associates Ltd.,
Consulting Engineers and Planners, Project 299086, Drawing SWM1, revision 5 dated
February 7, 2002; received February 22, 2002.
143
• Silt Fence Installation Detail Drawing submitted by the applicant; received March 26,
2002.
• Street Catchbasin Inlet Sediment Trap Detail Drawing submitted by the applicant;
received March 26, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of demolishing the existing 75 bed Markhaven Long Term Care Facility
and construct a new 96 bed retirement home. With the exception of the northwest corner, the
existing building is located outside the Regional Storm flood plain of the Exhibition Creek; the
main parking lot along the west side is entirely within the fringe area of the flood plain. Due to
the larger replacement structure, additional parking needed on the east side of the new
building, and the appropriate emergency vehicle (i.e. fire truck) turning access required by the
municipality, the west wall of the new long term care facility will marginally protrude into the
Regional Storm flood plain. However, the new building and main parking lot will be located at
approximately the same location; there will be no increase in flood susceptibility to the
proposed structure and parking area. The development concept was reviewed and approved
through related Site Plan Control Application (File No. SP.99- 009328). The site is not presently
fill regulated; however, fill lines are proposed as part of the Authority's Fill Regulation Extension
Program.
Control of Flooding:
Although small portions of the west wall of the proposed building will extend into the Regional
Storm flood plain of the Exhibition Creek, the new structure will be floodproofed to 0.3 metres
above the Regional Storm flood elevation of 189.20 metres Canadian Geodetic Datum. The
western parking area situated within the flood plain will be slightly raised (0 to 0.3 metres) to
achieve positive drainage away from the new building and to ensure that stormwater runoff
flows into the existing storm sewer catchbasins. All excess fill material during site excavation
will be removed from the property. Staff has confirmed that the control of flooding will not be
affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
A combination of silt fencing and catchbasin sediment traps will be installed to impede the
overland migration of construction - generated sediments.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is located on the relatively level area of the Exhibition Creek stream
corridor. There are no slope instability or geotechnical issues evident at this site. No significant
resource features will be impacted by the proposed works; all filled and disturbed areas will be
stabilized / revegetated following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
144
CFN: 32984
Report Prepared by: George Lela, extension 5342
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: March 26, 2002
Application #: 082 /02 /MARK
8.1.18 ZOLTAN SIMON
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 31, Concession 7, (5934 19th Avenue), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Zoltan & Gabby Simon.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill material for minor lot grading as part of the
construction of a 7.6 metre by a 13.7 metre detached garage, within the Fill Regulated Area of
the Little Rouge River.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan prepared by Christine Wood Architect dated March 2002; received March 18,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and placing fill material for minor lot grading in order to
facilitate the construction of a 7.6 metre by 13.7 metre detached garage. The proposed
building will be constructed partially within the Fill Regulated Area of the Little Rouge River.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed garage (and the-existing dwelling) is located outside the Regional Storm flood
plain; therefore, the control of flooding Will not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected during construction, as the work site is located approximately
120 metres from the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The entire building site is located on tableland and is situated more than 10 metres from the
top -of -bank of the well - defined (and stable) valley corridor of the Little Rouge River. There are
no slope instability or geotechnical issues evident at this site. No significant resource features
will be impacted by the proposed works; all graded and disturbed areas will be revegetated
following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
145
CFN: 32756
Report Prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: March 21, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 002 /02 /MARK
8.1.19 DEBORAH ROSS & BRIAN VAN OPSTAL
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 160, Plan 66R -8544, (60 Castle Rock Drive), in
the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Deborah Ross & Brian Van Opstal.
The purpose is to excavate fill within a fill regulated area of the Don River to facilitate the
installation of an in- ground swimming pool.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Location of Pool indicated on survey of 60 Castle Rock Drive prepared by Pioneer
Pools and received by TRCA on March 6, 2002.
• E -mails dated March 12 and 25, 2002 indicating Intention to remove fill and restore
vegetation and original grades after construction, submitted by Brian Durand of
Pioneer Pools.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To excavate fill material as part of the installation of an in- ground swimming pool. The subject
property is located partially within the Fill Regulated area of the Don River. The pool will be
located approximately 3 metres from top of bank in a back yard that is currently sodded. The
property is west of a gently sloping valley and municipal park and therefore there will be no
impact on slope stability. All fill material will be removed from the site.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm flood plain; there will be no
impact on flooding.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from these works as they are located 50 metres from the
watercourse. All excavated fill will be removed and disposed of off site.
Conservation of Land:
No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works; all disturbed areas
are to be restored following construction. Original grades will be restored after construction.
146
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33004
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Patricia Young, extension 5324
Date: March 8, 2002
Application #: 097/02/RH
8.1.20 RALPH CRISTILLO
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 94, Plan 240, (233 Lakeland Crescent), in the
Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Ralph Cristillo.
The purpose is to construct in a flood plain, excavate and place fill within the Regional Storm
flood plain and the Fill Regulated Area of the East Humber River Lake Wilcox area and the Oak
Ridges Special Policy Area to facilitate construction of a single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and filling material as part of the construction of a single
family dwelling. The entire property is located within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill
Regulated area of the East Humber River at Lake Wilcox as well as the Oak Ridges Special
Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed house will be floodproofed to above the level of the Regional Storm and all
excavated material will be removed from the site, therefore the control of flooding will not be
affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be installed prior to construction and will remain until the area is
re- vegetated.
Conservation of Land:
No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works and all disturbed
areas will be re- vegetated following construction.
147
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development within established Special Policy
Areas of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor management Program.
CFN: 32974
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Patricia Young, extension 5324
Date: February 27, 2002
TOWNSHIP OF ADJALA - TOSORONTIO
Application #: 092/02/RH
8.1.21 ANTHONY PIROLI
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 1, Concession 3 Part 6 Plan
51 R- 30420, (), in the Township of Adjala - Tosorontio, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Anthony Piroli.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and construct in a flood plain through the installation of a
culvert and associated fill in order to create a driveway entrance..
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing No. 1, prepared by Anthony Piroli, dated March 21, 2002, red line revised by
B.C. on March 22, 2002.
• Fig. 6 - M.T.R.C.A. Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to alter a watercourse and construct in a flood plain through the installation of a
culvert and associated fill in order to create a driveway entrance. The watercourse in this reach
functions as a small wetland area with intermittent flows.
Control of Flooding:
The culvert is sized appropriately to convey the intermittent flows. The works will not result in
an increase of flooding as the culvert is sized to convey stormflows.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be installed around the construction area to impede the migration of fill material
into the watercourse. All disturbed and exposed surface areas will be revegetated following
construction.
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope stability and erosion concerns within the project area. All disturbed areas
will be revegetated following construction with native grass seed.
148
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 3.3 - Policies And Procedures For Identifying
Watercourses and Alterations - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
CFN: 33003
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: March 10, 2002
149
Application #: 098 /02 /ADJ
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES. #B30/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Gerri Lynn O'Connore
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.22 - 8.1.29, inclusive), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items, for
which all the required Information was received and finalized as listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.22 BRAM EAST PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT GROUP LTD.
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 6, Concession 10 NDS, in the City of
Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bram
East Phase 1 Development Group Ltd..
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a new sanitary
trunk sewer.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2007.
• Drawings: G1A Revision 2 and Sheet 9, all dated received March 20, 2002, redline
revised April 2, 2002, prepared by Candevcon Limited.
• Drawings: Sheets 10 and 11, dated received January 23, 2002, redline revised April 2,
2002, prepared by Candevcon Limited.
• Drawing: L1 - Existing Vegetation and Restoration Planting Plan, dated received April
2, 2002, prepared by Strybos Associates Limited.
• Letter submissions of February 18, 2002 and March 19, 2002, prepared by Candevcon
Limited.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a new sanitary
trunk sewer. The works include construction of new sanitary trunk sewer (approximately 250
metres in length) within the valley corridor of a Humber River tributary. This project represents
approximately 20% of the entire sewer routing proposed within the valley with the remaining
portion of the sewer subject to a future permit application. The overall sanitary sewer routing
selection was made as part of The Region of Peel's Water and Wastewater Servicing Master
Plan Study which was carried out in accordance with the Class Environmental Assessment
(EA) Process. The notice of completion was issued on May 19, 1999 for the EA.
150
Control of Flooding:
The works will maintain existing grades within the floodplain and therefore are not expected to
impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. The new sanitary sewer will be
floodproofed through sealed manholes and venting stacks raised above the Regional Storm
Flood elevation.
Pollution:
Erosion control measures will be installed to prevent sedimentation construction to prevent
sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The project will include extensive plantings within the valley corridor. This planting will result in
the enhancement of the valley corridor through re- establishment of riparian vegetation, as there
is currently minimal woody vegetation or forest cover. In addition, the plantings will aid in
reducing the potential for stream erosion or meander. The works include one crossing of the
Humber River tributary which Will be completed through jack and bore method. Potential
impacts to fish habitat can be mitigated through the use of erosion control measures and
restoration of disturbed areas.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32986
Report Prepared by: Chris Hibberd, extension 5281
For information contact: Chris Hibberd, extension 5281
Date: February 25, 2002
Application #: 080 /02 /BRAM
8.1.23 CITY OF BRAMPTON
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 12, 13, 14, Concession 6 EHS,
( Torbram Road- Castlem'ore Road to Sandalwood Parkway), in the City of Brampton,
Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton.
The Purpose is to construct new structures (2 stormwater headwalls and outfalls) within a
Regional Storm Floodplain in order to facilitate construction of Torbrain Road.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004.
• Drawing K2 -12; Sheet 10; Torbram Road Widening; Contract 01 -110; dated November
27, 2001; received March 18, 2002; prepared by City of Brampton. '
• Drawing K2 -6; Sheet 3; Torbram Road Widening; Contract 01 -110; dated November 1,
2001; received March 20, 2002; prepared by City of Brampton.
• Drawing K2 -3; Sheet 12; Torbram Road Widening; Contract 01 -110; dated March 11,
2002; received March 18, 2002; prepared' by City of Brampton.
• Drawing K2 -3; Sheet 12A; Torbram Road Widening; Contract 01 -110; dated March 11,
2002; received March 19, 2002; prepared by City of Brampton.
151
• Drawing K2 -3; Sheet 12B; Torbram Road Widening; Contract 01 -110; dated March 11,
2002; received March 18, 2002; prepared by City of Brampton.
• Figure 7 -Heavy Duty Silt Fence Detail; received March 18, 2002, OPSD.
• Drawing L -1- Restoration Plan; dated March 21, 2002; received March 25, 2002;
prepared by ESG International.
• Letter of Undertaking.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of the reconstruction of Torbram Road from Castlemore Road /Bovaird
Drive in the south to Sandalwood Parkway in the north. Works within the regulated area
involve the construction of 2 outfall channels and the reconstruction of Torbram Road. The only
section that is regulated is within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with watercourse
just south of Sandalwood Parkway. The existing bridge structure will not change. TRCA staff
provided comment during the Environmental Assessment Review process.
Control of Flooding:
The existing watercourse crossing will not be altered, therefore, there will not be any impacts to
flooding.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the
construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. As
there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to
fish habitat loss. The potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish
habitat will be mitigated with erosion and sedimentation plans in effect. The proposed works
will impact no significant terrestrial resource features.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32497
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: March 22, 2002
Application #: 246 /01 /BRAM
8.1.24 ROCK VALLEY DEVELOPMENT LTD.
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 11, Concession 7 NDS, in the
City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Rock Valley Development Ltd..
152
The purpose is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of a stormwater
management facility and several outfall areas into the Humber River all of which are located
within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. This is in support of a residential subdivision for Rock
Valley Development Limited (File 21T -01 -0198).
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2007.
• Plans prepared by Candevcon Ltd., dated July 20, 2001: Storm Water Management
Pond. No. 1 (No. M.3), Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (No. M.2), Street 'A' (No.
P1), Storm Sewer From Street 'A' To Pond and FDC Easement From Street 'C' To
Outfall (No. P5), Grading - Part 1 (No. G.3), Grading - Part 2 (No. G.3A) General Plan -
Above Ground Services (No. G.1).
• Storm Easement From Street 'C' To Outfall, prepared by Candevcon Ltd., dated
January 2, 2002.
• Plans prepared by Paul Coeburn Associates Ltd., dated October 2001, revised March
28, 2002: Topsoil Depth Plan (NO. L03), Valleyland Planting Plan (No. L02),
Stormwater Management Pond (No. L01).
• Pond Details, prepared by Paul Cosburn Associates Ltd., dated November 2001,
revised March 28, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal Consist of excavating and placing fill material for the purpose of constructing
two stormwater drainage outfalls, a stormwater management pond and two associated outfalls.
The works are located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and will direct flows into the
Humber River. The proposed stormwater management pond has been designed for both
quantity and quality control to service the proposed residential plan of subdivision for Rock
Valley Development Limited (File 21T-01-0198).
Control of Floodina:
The pond construction will be located outside of the 100 -year flood elevation and' the
calculated meander belt. The outfalls lie within the 100 -year flood elevation and calculated •
meander belt but have been designed to minimize alterations to the existing grade levels.
Therefore, the proposed works will not affect the conveyance or storage of flood water.
Pollution:
Detailed sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during
construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley and watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The main stormwater management pond is located outside of the 100 -year flood elevation and
beyond the calculated meander belt of the watercourse. Most of the existing vegetation within
the valley corridor will be retained and new plantings will be provided around the pond and
outfall areas including a 10 -metre buffer of riparian vegetation along the entire reach of the
outfall side of the watercourse.
153
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32842
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: January 22, 2002
CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
Application #: 031 /02 /BRAM
8.1.25 1429036 ONTARIO INC.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Plan 43R -5366,
(3265 Derry Road East), in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as
located on the property owned by 1429036 Ontario Inc..
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate a minor building
addition within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004.
• Site Plan, Drawing No. Al, prepared by Velizar Genov of Architectural Design
Consulting, dated December 2001, revised March 19, 2002.
• Ground Floor Plan, Drawing No. A3, prepared by Velizar Genov of Architectural
Design Consulting, dated September 2001.
• Second Floor Plan, Drawing No. A4, prepared by Velizar Genov of Architectural
Design Consulting, dated September 2001.
• Elevations, Drawing No. A6, prepared by Velizar Genov of Architectural Design
Consulting, dated September 2001.
• Elevations, Drawing No. A7, prepared by Velizar Genov of Architectural Design
Consulting, dated September 2001.
• Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Velizar Genov of Architectural Design Consulting,
dated March 27, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Garry deMan of Deman Construction, dated March
20, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of constructing a minor addition onto an existing two-story building to
accommodate its use as a funeral home. The subject property is located within the Regional
Storm Floodplain of the Mimico Creek. All openings for the addition will be elevated above the
350 -year storm elevation and all existing openings that are below this elevation will be "actively
flood- proofed" with the use of engineered door gaskets.
154
Controiof Flooding:
Impact to flooding should be minimal as the new addition represents a 12% increase to bring
the existing 1928 SQ.M. building to 2158 SQ.M.
Pollution:
All works will be surrounded by a sediment control fence which will remain in place during
construction to ensure that construction generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of. Land:
All disturbed areas are to be restored following construction. As there will be no instream
works, there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal cornplies with Section 4.2.2 - Development & Redevelopment/Intensification
Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33017 Application #: 105 /02 /MISS
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: March 13, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
8.1.26 MORRIS & JOSIE MELE
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Plan 65R- 20089, (226 Napa Valley
Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Morris & Josie Mele.
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area to facilitate construction of an inground pool.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004.
• Letter dated March 11, 2002 signed by Morris Mele and Josie Mele stating all
excavated sediment will be disposed of off site.
• Pool for Mele residence prepared by Rand Pools and Spas received March 27, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to remove fill to facilitate the construction of an inground pool within the Fill
Regulated area of the Humber River. The proposed works are located on a lot in an approved
plan of subdivision within the Humber River valley.
155
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm flood plain. There will be no
impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located over 300 metres from the Humber River. No sedimentation is
expected.
Conservation of Land:
There are no significant resource features on the site. There are no geotechnical issues related
to the proposal. The proposed works are consistent with the existing development in the
corridor reach. All excess fill material will be removed from the site as part of the work.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property improvements and Ancillary
Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33023
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Patricia Young, extension 5324
Date: March 18, 2002
TOWN OF AJAX
Application #: 112 /02/VAUG
8.1.27 TOWN OF AJAX
To alter a waterway on, (Achilles Road), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Ajax.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse , a tributary of Carruthers Creek, to facilitate the
construction of a temporary outfall as part of the relocation of Achilles Road.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004.
• Drawing G- 3- Achilles Road Construction, Sta. 10 +500 to Sta 10 +745; dated February
15, 2002; received March 28, 2002; prepared by TSH.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
156
Proposal:
The proposal involves the construction of a temporary outfall in order facilitate Phase 1 of the
reconstruction of Achilles Road. TRCA staff commented on the relocation of Achilles Road
during the Environmental Assessment process. This application is Phase 1 of the proposal
which will include the portion of the road from Harwood Avenue to just west of the tributary
where the outfall will be located. Phase 2 will involve the road reconstruction from the tributary
to the proposed Carruthers Creek Drive and will be handled under a separate permit. The
temporary outlet for Phase 1 is required because the stormwater management pond for the
Carruthers Creek Drive interchange at 401 will not be constructed until later in 2002 or early in
2003.
Control of Flooding:
The temporary outfall will not be located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore, there
will be no impacts-to flooding.
Pol ution:
Standard erosion'control measures ( silt fence, rock check dams, straw bale flow check dams )
will be implemented to ensure that the construction- generated sediments do not enter the
watercourse. Storm water management (water quality) has been addressed with the
construction of the 1 metre wide flat swale lined with sod. In the future there will be a storm
sewer constructed to drain into the future storm water management pond at the Carruthers
Creek Interchange at Hwy 401.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with an erosion control blanket and sod following
construction. As there will be no in stream works associated with the project there will be no
concerns related to fish habitat loss. The proposed works will impact no significant resource
features.
Policy. Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing -of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32982
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For inforivation contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: March 26, 2002
Application #: 084 /02 /AJAX
TOWN OF MARKHAM
8.1.28 MADRID DEVELOPMENTS LTD.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10, Concession
6 Lot 10, Plan 65R -5041, (5221 Highway #7 - Unionville), in the Town of Markham,
Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Madrid Developments
ltd..
The purpose is to excavate and place fill material for lot grading as part of the construction of a
157
drive through restaurant, within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill Regulated Area of the
Rouge River, as well as the Unionville Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004.
• Plans prepared by Johnson Sustronk Weinstein & Associates, Job 01 -47, Drawings
S -1, E -1, and G -1 dated October 2001; received January 29, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and placing fill material as part of the construction of a
drive through restaurant. The entire site is located within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill
Regulated Area of the Rouge River, as well as the Unionville Special Policy Area (SPA). Staff
had previously reviewed a Site Plan Control Application (File: SC 00 241339) and Rezoning
Application (File: ZA 95.000025) for this proposal. Through the review of these planning
applications, staff ensured that the development area was situated outside the hydraulic
floodway and entirely within the SPA portion of the site. In addition, a 23.6 metre setback from
the Rouge River was achieved between the watercourse and the proposed development. This
buffer area to the south of the development site will be transferred into public ownership and
left in a natural, undisturbed state. The Ontario Municipal Board has subsequently approved
the proposal which included staffs requirements.
Control of Flooding:
Staff has reviewed and accepted a proposed filling / grading scheme prepared by the project
consultant and confirmed that these works will not affect the control of flooding. In addition, the
proposed restaurant building will be floodproofed to above the Regional Storm flood elevation
of 172.3 metres Canadian Geodetic Datum (C.G.D.); the minimum opening elevation into the
structure will be 172.5 metres C.G.D.
Pollution:
A combination of silt fencing and catchbasin sediment traps will be installed to impede the
overland migration of construction - generated sediments. Furthermore, post - development water
quality treatment will be achieved by installing catchbasin oil / grit separators; stormwater
runoff from the site will be directed to the existing municipal storm sewer system.
Conservation of Land:
The entire site is located on the relatively level area of the Rouge River stream corridor at this
location. There are no slope instability or geotechnical issues evident at this site. No significant
resource features will be impacted by the proposed works; all filled and disturbed areas will be
revegetated / stabilized following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1(C) - Existing Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
158
CFN: 32883
Report Prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: March 22, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 048/02 /MARK
8.1.29 WILLIAM KOCJANCIC
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 194, Plan 2383, (229 Lennox Avenue), in the
Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by
William Kocjancic.
The purpose is to remove an existing home and reconstruct a larger single family dwelling
within a fill regulated area of the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004.
• Site Plan of Part of Lot 194, Registered Plan 2383 prepared by Ertl Surveyors on
March 26, 2002.
• Letter of ,undeitaking prepared by William Kocjancic dated March 27, 2002 stating all
excavated fill will be dl"sposed of off site and a sediment fence will be Installed
between the construction and the watercourse.
• Details of the timber retaining wall and approval from neighbour prepared by William
Kocjancic and dated April 3, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
Remove an existing house and reconstruct a larger single family dwelling in a fill regulated area
of the Don River. The subject property is within an existing residential neighborhood of
Richmond Hill, and a watercourse flows behind the house. The subject property is partially
within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm flood line of the Don River. The proposed
house will be set back more than 10 metres from the flood plain
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are outside of the regional storm flood plain; therefore there will be no
impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment feriae will be erected prior to construction and will remain until the works are
complete and the area has been sodded, to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of,Land:
The property is located'within a developed portion of the Don River valley. The subject
property is currently a residential lot. There are no resource features on the property.
159
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 D) - Replacement Structures within Highly
Urbanized Areas of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33016
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Patricia Young, extension 5324
Date: March 14, 2002
CITY OF PICKERING
Application #: 106/02/RH
8.1.30 COUGS INVESTMENTS /R. HALLIDAY IN TRUST
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 20, Concession 2, (Wikwood Crescent),
in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned
by Cougs Investments /R. Halliday In Trust.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the development of 4
single - family residences at the end of Wildwood Crescent, on lots created through Land
Division Committee applications, LD 253/2001, LD 254/2001, LD 255/2001, and LD 256/2001.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2007 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Servicing and Grading Plan, Drawing No. GR -1, dated October 2001, and
Construction Management & Erosion /Sedimentation Control Plan, Drawing No.
ER -101, dated February 2002, all prepared by Sernas Associates, date received March
18, 2002.
• Tree Preservation and Edge Management Plan, Drawing No. L1, revision date April 4,
2002, prepared by Paul Cosburn Associates Limited, date received April 4, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by Cougs Investments Ltd., dated April 2, 2002
confirming that the applicant will satisfy all 5 TRCA items of concerns relating to the
Tree Preservation Plan.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill in a regulated area to facilitate the
site servicing and grading of 4 new residential lots located at the end of Wildwood Crescent,
created through Land Division Committee applications. The lots are situated beyond the top of
bank and natural features on the subject lands and are in keeping with existing development
within this reach of the Duffins Creek.
Control of Flooding:
The 4 Tots are all located above the Regional Storm floodplain, therefore there will be no impact
on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
160
Pollution:
Erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during the construction project, with
all excess excavated material removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is located adjacent to the Duffins Creek valley, being gently sloping and
well vegetated. Through both a rezoning application and the consent applications, TRCA staff
established the limits of development based on the top of bank and the tree line, with all valley
lands being transferred to public ownership. The 4 new residences will maintain an
appropriate setback from the natural features and all development will be undertaken in
accordance with the approved Tree Preservation and Edge Management Plan.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.1.1 - New Urban Development - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: '33027
Report Prepared by: Nbra'Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: March 19, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO [MIDTOWN COMMUNITY]
Application #: 115/02/PICK
8.1.31 JOANIE SMITH
To place fill within a regulated area on (4 Crete Court), in the City of Toronto
(Midtown Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Joanie Smith.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Don River in order to
facilitate the demolition of an existing one story single family home and the construction of a
325 sq. m. (3500 sq. ft.) two story dwelling within the original footprint. The proposal also
includes a new garage addition to the east side.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Survey, RED LINE REVISED First Floor and Basement Plan, Front and Rear
Elevations, prepared by RON Custom Home Designers, dated February 2002, date
received March 1, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
161
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Don River in order to
facilitate the demolition of an existing one story single family home and the construction of a
325 sq. m. (3500 sq. ft.) two story dwelling within the original footprint. The proposal also
includes a new garage addition to the east side.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm floodplain, therefore the
proposed works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
Erosion control measures (sediment fence), will be installed and maintained during the
construction process. All excavated material will be removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is located adjacent to a wooded portion of the Wilket Creek ravine
system, and approximately 200 metres from the Don River. TRCA staff have requested that no
trees be removed from the area located outside of the building footprint. The proposed works
are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach and will not impact on any
significant resource features. TRCA technical staff has determined that there are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33018
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: March 13, 2002
- of the Authority's Valley
Application #: 104/02/TOR
RES. #B31/02 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS
Rear of 7 Bevan Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York
CFN 33029. Receipt of a request to consider disposing of a parcel of
TRCA land at the rear of 7 Bevan Road, located south of Major
Mackenzie Drive, west of Keele Street in the Maple area of the City of
Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Irene Jones
THAT the request to consider disposing of a parcel of TRCA land at the rear of 7 Bevan
Road located south of Major Mackenzie Drive, west of Keele Street in the Maple area of
the City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, be referred to TRCA staff for review in
accordance with established TRCA policies;
162
AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future
date recommending further action.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This issue is being brought to your attention in accordance with Resolution #A289/94, adopted
by the members of TRCA at a meeting held on January 27, 1995. This resolution requires staff
to bring requests for the disposal of TRCA lands forward and requires Executive Committee
direction for staff to begin the technical review, agency circulation and public consultation, at
the end of which a recommendation will be made as to whether the property is surplus to
TRCA's needs and can be considered for possible disposal.
TRCA is in receipt of a request from Guido and Joanne Marinucci to consider selling
approximately 0.3 hectares (0.7 acres) of TRCA land at the rear of their property at 7 Bevan
Road, located south of Major Mackenzie Drive, west of Keefe Street in the Maple area of the
City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York.
A plan illustrating this location is attached.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: March 18, 2002
Attachments: 1
163
Attachment 1
REQUEST FOR DISPOSAt. OF AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS
; Roar of 7 Ewan Road, City of Vaughan, Regional MunicIpoilty of Y
CFN 33029
164
RES. #B32/02 - FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, SCANNING AND VECTORIZATION
PROJECT FOR THE HUMBER RIVER WATERSHED IN PEEL AND
YORK REGIONS
Approval to retain QSP Geographics Ltd. to convert Humber River
1:2000 scale floodplain mapping within Peel and portions of York Region
to digital format in order to facilitate the update and management of
Flood and Fill Regulation Line Mapping.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Irene Jones
THAT the Authority enter into an agreement with OSP Geographics Ltd. to complete the
conversion of fifty-three 1:2000 scale analogue floodplain map sheets within the Humber
River Watershed at a cost of $1100 per map sheet with a maximum upset limit not to
exceed $58,300, ekcluding applicable taxes.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
One of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and
mapped information for use by the Authority and others, and to incorporate improved
technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order
to continue to provide accurate floodplain management information, the Watershed
Management Division has prepared a Floodplain Management Work Plan to identify watershed
specific requirement§ necessary to update the Authority's current Flood and Fill Line
Regulation Mapping. Priority watersheds identified within the Work Plan include the Humber
River given the extent of previous, current and future development activities.
41 visual screening process has been completed to compare topographic and planimetric
features provided on the Authority's 1977 analogue mapping with recent aerial photography
(1999) to determine Where significant changes warrant the preparation of new base mapping.
From this- assessment, it has been determined that approximately 53 analogue map sheets
within the Humber River Watershed (in Peel and York Regions) have not significantly changed
since the base mapping was compiled. It is proposed to convert these 53 analogue map
sheets to digital format in order to permit TRCA staff to continue to update base mapping
information as future changes occur and to facilitate integration with new digital mapping. For
those map sheets where significant changes have occurred, the preparation of new digital
mapping will be required. .
Upon a review of available technologies, staff has concluded that the most cost effective
method available to convert current TRCA analogue mapping into digital format is through a
scanning and vectorization process. The process, offered only through QSP Geographics
Inc., involves scanning the hard copy map sheets as raster images and vectorizing key •
features (i.e., contours, watercourses, culverts, bridges; etc.) into individual, unique lines
through proprietary software developed specifically for this application. QS' Geographics Inc.
has committed to deliver the final product within five weeks of project initiat on. This approach
represents a substantial cost savings when compared to the preparation of new digital base
mapping at approximately $5,000 per sheet.
165
In Tight of the above, it is recommended that this work be sole sourced to QSP Geographics
Ltd.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds required to complete the project are available through approved 2002 funding from Peel
and York Regions.
For Information contact: Darlene Conway, extension 5278
Date: March 01, 2002
RES. #B33 /02 - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Update. To report on corporate Environmental Management System
progress and work plan for completing and implementing the EMS in
2002, in support of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's
Living City initiative.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Irene Jones
THAT the update of the Environmental Management System progress and proposed work
plan for 2002 be received.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
As per the Authority's direction under RES. #A279 /99, staff embarked on the planning portion
of an Environmental Management System (EMS) at the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA). Environmental Management Systems are administration tools that ensure
environmental impacts of an organization's operations are monitored, reviewed, assessed and
refined on a regular basis in order to achieve continual improvement in environmental
performance.
ISO 14000 and other Environmental Management System frameworks call for a thorough and
participatory investigation into all ways in which an organization impacts the environment, both
negatively and positively, prior to enacting management plans aimed at specific operational
procedures. This is done in order to ensure that the most "significant impacts" are addressed
before other, less significant impacts, ensuring a cost - effective approach.
In an effort to generate and finalize a list of "significant environmental aspects ", 31 TRCA staff
members took part in an internal consultation process during the autumn of 2001. Meetings
were held, where possible, with managers and EMS representatives from the various work
areas.
166
The list of significant environmental aspects (operations /actions having negative impacts), the
management of which will form the basis of the Environ'mental Management System, is as
follows:
• Energy Use
• Vehicle, Equipment and Transportation (incl. air quality impacting emissions)
• Waste Management
• Procurement
• Land Use Management
• Management of Potentially Contaminated Lands
• Water Use
In February, Management Committee discussed these findings and approved the following
work plan for 2002:
• Appoint staff committees to address each aspect above;
• Facilitate (EMS representative and staff committees) the development of management
programs to address each of the negative aspects;
• Management Programs will identify measurements of success, set targets to be
achieved, and contain operational procedures designed to improve environmental
performance;
• Collect baseline information pertaining to the indicators and targets selected;
• Design, program and implement the database /EMS manual outlining all Environmental
Programs, staff responsibilities, targets, results, etc. (est. Cost of database is
$5,000.00);
• Continue "Walking the Talk" publications in order to advise staff of progress and
generate support and awareness;
• Pursue training opportunities as needs permit and budgets allow.
RATIONALE
The presence of an Environmental Management System (EMS) is increasingly considered a
fundamental requirement of corporate responsibility. Any corporation or agency employing a
sustainable vision of it's future must be aware of, and effectively manage, its corporate
environmental performance.
In addition to the primary ethical and credibility reasons for undertaking an EMS, it is also
important to note some other positive benefits of an EMS. An EMS helps build efficiencies into
the administration and management system itself. Substantial and real cost savings can result,
as energy use is reduced for example.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
$11,000 has been budgeted for the EMS development in 2002, under account number 101 -20.
For Information contact: Brian Dundas, extension 5262
Date: March 22, 2002
167
RES. #B34 /02 -
Moved by:
Seconded by:
ENFORCEMENT AND SECURITY
Appointment of Enforcement Officer and designation as Provincial
Offenses Officer
Ron Moeser
Irene Jones
THAT the appointment of Steven Leonard Beausoleil as an Enforcement Officer for the
purpose of enforcing regulations made by the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority, pursuant to Section 29 of the Conservation Authorities Act, be approved;
AND FURTHER THAT the Ministry of Natural Resources be requested to designate Steven
Leonard Beausoleil as a Provincial Offenses Officer.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
For the purpose of enforcing the regulations made by the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority, pursuant to Section 28(1)(d) of the Conservation Authorities Act, the Authority may
appoint personnel as Enforcement Officers. This appointment pertains to Ontario Regulation
119 made under Section 29 of the Act.
It is also necessary to have our Enforcement Officers designated as Provincial Offenses
Officers in order that they may commence proceedings under the Provincial Offenses Act to
enforce:
• Regulations made under Section 29 of the Conservation Authorities Act
• Trespass to Property Act
With the approval of the Minister:
• Off Road Vehicles Act
• Motorized Snow Vehicles Act
• Liquor License Act.
Report prepared by: Al Willison, extension 5285
For Information contact: Al WIIlison, extension 5285
Date: March 18, 2002
RES. #B35 /02 - AIR MILES REWARD PROGRAM
Agreement for Black Creek Pioneer Village to become part of the Air
Miles Reward Program
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Irene Jones
168
THAT the agreement between LMG Travel Services Limited and the Authority to enable
Black Creek Pioneer Village to participate as a reward supplier In the Air Miles Reward
Program be approved;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to take the necessary action to implement the
agreement including the signing of appropriate documents.
CARRIED
RATIONALE
Staff has been negotiating With representatives of the Air Miles Reward program to enable
Black Creek Pioneer Village to participate in the Air Miles Rewards catalogue. Air Miles
collectors could use their accilmulated Air Miles points to pay for general admission ito Black
Creek Pioneer Village. BCPV is reimbursed for 50% of the cost of each admission.
The terms of the agreement include:
• program to cornmence April 1, 2002 and continue until April 1, 2004; program is
renewable for successive three year terms; agreement can be terminated by either party
for any reason by giving 90 days notice of cancellation prior to end of initial term.
• reward package will be a certificate equivalent to the retail value of the admission price;
.certificates shall be redeemed at the end of each month by submission of an invoice to
LMG Travel Services Ltd.
• provisions in the agreement cover trade marks, use of BCPV logo, indemnification,
insurance, confidentiality etc.
This is a significant opportunity for Black Creek Pioneer Village to gain visibility and exposure in
the Air Miles Reward Program. For example, BCPV will be included in full page ads in the
Toronto Star which the Air Miles Program uses to promote the product Staff are negotiating to
have admissions and purchases at BCPV included in the Air Miles program.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
This agreement has significant value to BCPV in terms of marketing exposure and visibility The
cost to the Authority is the 50% discount on each certificate redeemed. BCPV uses such "2 for
1" coupons and other promotions to encourage attendance as part of its annual marketing
plan:
Report prepared by: Jim Dillane, extension 6292
For Information contact: Mardi Alexander, extension 5414; Jim Dillane, extension 6292
Date: April 02, 2002
169
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:26 a.m., on April 5, 2002.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
ts,
'THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #4/02
May 3, 2002
The Executive Committee Meeting #4/02, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office, on
Friday, May 3, 2002. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:33 a.m
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
REGRETS
Lorna Bissell Member
Ron Moeser Member
RES. #B36 /02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/02, held on April 5, 2002, be approved.
CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #B37 /02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed
Diego and Denice Muzzatti, CFN 33058. Purchase of property located on
the east side of Riverside Drive, south of Langstaff Road, City of
Vaughan, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition
Project 2001- 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber
River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
171
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.039 hectares (0.098 acres), more
or less, be purchased from Diego and Denice Muzzatti, said lands consisting of an
irregular shaped parcel of land at the rear of 120 Riverside Drive, Part of Lot 9,
Concession 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, described as Lot 35,
Registered Plan M -1111;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance,
subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approved the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of this property.
Attached is a sketch showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property is valley land /flood plain in the Humber River Watershed, falls within the
Authority's approved master plan for acquisition, and is adjacent to other Authority holdings.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The annual taxes for the property to be conveyed are estimated to be $50.00. The property will
be maintained along with the Authority's existing land holdings in the area and will not have
any significant impact on the maintenance costs for this area.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This purchase will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502 - Flood Control Hazard Account.
Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Date: April 22, 2002
Attachments: 1
172
Attachment 1
\ RE;
NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component
Humber River Watershed
Diego and Denise Miwatti
CFN 33058
1
LI
173
TRCALANUS
SUBJECT PROPERTY
111 1 111 1 1
RES. #B38/02 - THE ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION
Terms of Reference for the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition:
2002 -2004. Approval of the Terms of Reference for the Etobicoke - Mimico
Watersheds Coalition: 2002 -2004.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Jim McMaster
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Terms of Reference for the
Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition, dated May, 2002, as appended, be approved;
THAT the local and regional municipalities in the Etoblcoke Creek and Mimico Creek
watersheds be requested to appoint one municipal council member to the
Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition;
THAT the West Community Council, City of Toronto, be requested to appoint
representatives to the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition;
THAT the municipalities be requested to appoint staff liaisons from appropriate
departments;
THAT applications be requested from the Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek watersheds
residents by July 2, 2002;
THAT other agencies and groups, as identified in the Terms of Reference, be requested
to appoint members and alternates by July 2, 2002;
AND FURTHER THAT a report be submitted to the Authority identifying the proposed
membership, including the Authority member, for formal approval.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
On November 22, 2001 the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force completed
the management strategy for the watersheds, entitled "Greening Our Watersheds:
Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds, including the 2001
Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card ". The strategy document is currently in its final stages of
production, and will be brought to Authority meeting #5/02, May 24, 2002 for approval.
"Greening Our Watersheds" recommends that the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition be
established by the Authority to "act as watershed champion. The group will monitor the
progress of the watershed strategies and ensure that actions are carried forward and targets
achieved."
At the final meeting of the Task Force, the following resolution was adopted (in part):
174
AND FURTHER THAT The TRCA be requested to establish the Etobicoke - Mimico
• Coalition as soon as possible in order to implement the recommendations contained in "
Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek
Watersheds, including the Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card ", (Res. #H99/01).
Similar groups ekist for the Don and Humber watersheds: the Don Watershed Revitalization
Council, The'Rouge Alliance and the Humber Watershed Alliance.
RATIONALE
The development of the Terms of Reference for the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Task Force
is based on those prepared for the Don Regeneration Council and the Humber Alliance. There
is one notable modification. In "Greening Our Watersheds ", it is recommended that community
action areas be established throughout the watersheds by the Watershed Coalition. Once
developed, stewardship groups for each action area are to be formed and the Chair of the
group is to be a member of the Watersheds Coalition. As an example, the Etobicoke - Mimico
Watersheds Task Force prepared community action area plans for three parts of the
watersheds: Heart Lake; Melton and South Mimico. At meeting #02/02, the Authority
approved the establishment of Stewardship Groups for these areas (Res. #A34 /02). These
groups will be formally initiated this spring and fall.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
• Advertisements will be placed in local newspapers identifying the application process for
prospective members;
• . Two information meetings will be held in June to provide an overview of the goals of the
Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Coalition and to answer questions of persons interested in
applying;
• Notice will also be enclosed in the forthcoming "CreekTime" newsletter;
• Letters will be sent to municipal clerks requesting council participation;
• Letters will be sent to municipalities and agencies requesting staff participation;
FUTURE BENEFITS /PROBLEMS
The Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition will benefit the TRCA by assisting with the
following actions:
• maintaining and enhancing contacts within the community regarding watershed
management issues;
• building capacity within the general community to deliver watershed management products
and services;
• advocating the values of the Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek watersheds;
providing a framework for meaningful community involvement in watershed management;
• acting as a united voice for addressing issues relevant to the municipal, provincial and
federal governments;
• providing leadership in watershed management;
• contributing a level of service that addresses regional needs and opportunities;
• supporting the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto and the delivery of the Living
City Campaign.
175
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The development and implementation support of watershed strategies is a core deliverable of
the TRCA. Funding support is available, in part, from the Conservation Foundation through the
Living City Campaign. Staff and Watersheds Coalition members will seek additional funds from
external sources to support the work of the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition.
Report prepared by: Beth Williston, extension 5263
For Information contact: Beth Williston, extension 5263
Date: April 19, 2002
Attachments: 1
176
Attachment 1
THEETOB /COKE- M /M /CO WATERSHEDS COAL /T /ON
2002 - 2005
Goals, Membership, Organization and
Terms of Reference
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
May, 2002
177
T0RQNTOmb RECroN- -'
o�nserva tion
ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION
GOALS, MEMBERSHIP, ORGANIZATION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE
1_0 AUTHORITY DIRECTION
The Authority, at its meeting #5/02, held on May 24, 2002, approved the following resolution:
RES. #XXX /02 -
ETOBICOKE-MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION
Adoption of the Terms of Reference for the Etobicoke - Mimico
Watersheds Coalition (Exec. Res. #x).x/02)
THAT the Terms of Reference for the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition, dated
May, 2002, as in Exec. Res. # /02, be adopted;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to take all actions necessary to establish the
Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition in time for the first meeting to occur in
September, 2002.
2_0 GOALS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The goals of the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition are to respect, protect and
regenerate the Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek watersheds and, more specifically, to assist
the Authority, the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto, other agencies, and the public:
I) with the implementation of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task
Force report titled, "Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for
Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks ".
ii) with the implementation of the recommendations of the Toronto and Region
Remedial Action Plan contained in Clean Waters, Clear Choices:
Recommendations for Action as they pertain to the Etobicoke Creek and Mimico
Creek watersheds; and,
iii) with the implementation of the actions required to address the targets
identified in the document titled, "Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization
Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks ", which includes the 2001
Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card.
The Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition will have the following general responsibilities
which significantly benefit the Authority:
• maintain and enhance contacts within the community regarding watershed management
issues;
178
• build capacity within the general community to deliver watershed management products
and services;
• advocate the values'of the Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek watersheds;
• provide a framework for meaningful community involvement in watershed management;
act as a united voice for addressing issues relevant to the municipal, provincial and federal
governments;
• provide leadership in watershed management;
• contribute a level of service that addresses regional needs and opportunities;
• support the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto and the delivery of the Living City
Campaign.
. 3M ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION MEMBERSHIP
3.1 The Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition shall consist of approximately 45 to
60 members including:
TRCA
• the Chair of the Authority or other Authority member;
Regional acid Local Municipalities
• one .Council member from each of the regional and local municipalities in the
Etobicoke or Mimico Creek watersheds:
Regional Municipality of Peel
City of Mississauga
City of Brampton
Town of Caledon;
Community Councils
• one councillor representing the City of Toronto's Etobicoke Community Council,
which has the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watersheds within its boundaries;
Residents
• 15 watershed residents including those interested in, or having experience in the
fields of environment, human health, marketing, writing, fundraising, planning and
media relations. Youth and peoples representing a diversity of cultures will be
actively encouraged to join.
179
Community Groups
• one representative and alternate from each of the following community groups
which have a specific interest in the Etobicoke Creek or Mimico Creek watersheds:
Citizens Concerned About the Future of the Etobicoke Creek Waterfront
Friends of Mimico Creek
Alderwood Environmentalists
Ontario Streams
Peel Federation of Agricultural
Credit River Anglers Association (mandate includes Etobicoke Creek)
South Peel Naturalists
Toronto Field Naturalists
Brampton Environmental Community Advisory Panel;
Stewardship Groups
• one representative from each of the following* stewardship groups:
Heart Lake
South Mimico
Malton;
*Note: As additional community action areas are developed and stewardship
groups formed (See Section 7.0), a representative from each new stewardship
group will be invited to join the Watersheds Coalition.
Other Public Agencies
• one representative and alternate from each of the following groups which have a
specific interest in the Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek watersheds:
Environment Canada
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
Ontario Ministry of Environment
Ontario Ministry of Citizenship, Culture and Recreation
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs;
Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Businesses /Business Organizations
• three persons representing businesses and /or business organizations interested in
corporate environmental stewardship and the economic vitality of the region;
Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto
• one person representing the Etobicoke Creek River Partner and one person
representing the Mimico Creek River Partner initiative, as designed under the Living
City Campaign;
Academic Institutions
• three persons drawn from the university, college, public /catholic /private school
systems interested in watershed management, restoration, research, and in
integrating sustainability issues into watershed applications and curriculum.
180
3.1.1 Local and Regional Municipality Representatives
The local and regional municipalities will be requested by the Authority to
confirm the participation of a council member to the Etobicoke - Mimico
Watersheds Coalition. A municipality may appoint a current Authority
member. The appointed members should represent an electoral ward
within the Etobicoke or Mimico Creek watersheds.
3.1.2 City of Toronto Community Council Representatives
Within the City of Toronto, the Etobicoke Community Council will be
requested to appoint a member of Council.
3.1.3 Watershed Residents, Business Members and Academic Institution
Representatives
Applications from watershed residents, businesses and academic
institutions will be solicited through announcements in the
Etobicoke - Mimico CreekTime newsletter, local newspapers, and through
press releases. A committee of three persons, comprised of one
member of the TRCA's Watershed Management Advisory Board, a TRCA
member of senior staff and the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Specialist
will recommend appointments to the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds
Coalition. This selection will take into consideration the following:
• demonstrated interest in the watershed /community;
• willingness of the applicant to meet the potential time and work
commitments;
• geographical representation of the watershed;
• professional expertise, and /or knowledge of the watershed in any
area which would assist in the implementation of assigned tasks.
3.1.4 Community Group Representatives
Selected community groups will be requested by the Authority to appoint
a representative and an alternate to the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds
Coalition. Alternate members will have voting privileges on all matters of
business.
3.1.5 Stewardship Group Representatives
The Chair and an alternate from each stewardship group established by
the Authority, representing community action areas in the watersheds will
be appointed to the Coalition. Alternate members will have voting
privileges on all matters of business.
3.1.6 Other Public Agency Representatives
Selected federal and provincial agencies will be requested by the
Authority to appoint a senior employee and an alternate to the
Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition. Alternate members will have
voting privileges on all matters of business.
3.2 Term of Appointment
Municipalities and other public agencies will be requested to appoint their
representatives for the three -year period coincident with the three -year term of
municipal councillors. All other members will be appointed for a two -year period with
the provision for a one -year renewal without re- application. Membership will be
reviewed on an annual basis. Members unable to fulfill their commitments will be
replaced normally at that time by the TRCA based on the nominees recommended by
Authority members, other Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition members and TRCA
senior staff.
Resignations may be filled by the Authority, as required, on the recommendation of the
selection committee as described in Item 3.1.3 above.
3.3 Attendance and Effort of Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition Members at
Meetings
Members will be required to attend on a regular basis all Watersheds Coalition
meetings.
Members will contribute actively to the work of the Coalition, prepare effectively for and
participate in at least one working committee.
Municipal councillors will be requested to assist in developing an effective
communication strategy to ensure their involvement in the Coalition while recognizing
their time commitment within their own municipalities.
It is anticipated that evening meetings will be held once per month. Additional working
groups may be required to deal with specific issues from time to time. Additional
meeting time will be required in these cases. Members unable to fulfill this commitment
will be replaced after missing three consecutive meetings to ensure broad and effective
representation on watershed issues.
3.4 Selection of Chair and Vice Chair of the Watersheds Coalition
The Chair and Vice -Chair will be elected by the Watersheds Coalition from amongst its
members. The Authority may appoint an interim chair until such time that an election
can take place. The Chair and Vice -Chair will also be ex- officio members of all working
committees.
182
3,5 Reporting Relationship
The Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition is considered a subcommittee of the
Watershed Management Advisory Board. The Watersheds Coalition Chair will report, at
least, on a semi - annual basis on projects and progress. Annual work plans will be
developed and submitted prior to the end of the first quarter of each year.
The Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition is not a formal commenting body;
Authority staff will advise the Watersheds Coalition of Authority projects being planned
or undertaken within the Etobicoke Creek or Mimico Creek watersheds and of major
planning initiatives or projects of others where the Authority may be a commenting or
permitting body.
The Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition may provide comments or other
information for the consideration of staff and•the Authority. On a project or application
specific basis, the Authority or Authority staff may request comments by the
Watersheds Coalition. These comments will be provided or sought within the time frame
necessary to maintain the Authority's service delivery standards.
4_0 RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO THE ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION
4.1 Authority Support
The Authority will provide staff support for the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition,
including technical project support and community outreach, based on-available
funding, and on a work plan developed by the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition
and approved by the Authority.
Subject to available funding, the staff secretariat will include:
• Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Specialist
• Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Projects Coordinator
• Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Resources Planner
• Technical Support Staff
• Secretary (part time)
The Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Coalition, and its working committees, will otherwise
strive-to be self - sufficient in achieving their goals.
Frorn-time to time, the assistance of additional TRCA staff may be required on a project
specific basis:- Provision of such assistance will be determined when a project plan is
completed by either the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition or a working
committee, and approved by the TRCA's Director of Watershed Management.
183
The project plan will clearly identify membership requirements, including TRCA staff,
Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition members and associate members. The
project plan will also identify expectations of the members' responsibilities, time
commitment and project funding availability and allotment.
4.2 Municipal Staff Liaison
Each local and regional municipality within the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek
watersheds will be requested to designate a staff liaison to the Etobicoke - Mimico
Watersheds Coalition from an appropriate department.
Within the City of Toronto, staff liaisons will be requested from the departments that
have direct responsibilities for open space, environmental planning and operations.
Municipal staff will be invited to all meetings and may wish to join specific working
committees. Annually, a separate meeting /forum will be held to share information on
Etobicoke - Mimico watershed plans underway, regeneration activities carried out
directly by municipalities and to ensure on -going liaison with appropriate departments.
4.3 Working Committees
The Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition will undertake its work through the active
involvement of its members on at least one committee.
Working committees will be dissolved when their work is substantially complete and
new committees are struck to deal with specific implementation items as determined by
the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition and communicated to the Authority at least
twice annually.
Smaller committees can be added for specific projects but the Watersheds Coalition will
generally be limited to 5 active /standing committees at any one time. This will ensure
the necessary focus and effort required, while serving to limit, to a reasonable level, the
demands on the Watersheds Coalition members and staff of the Authority and other
agencies.
4.3.1 Committee Membership and Associate Watersheds Coalition Members
The Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition committee members will
enlist the assistance of others interested in actively giving of their time and
talents to the protection, restoration and celebration of the watershed.
Additional committee members will also be recruited from federal,
provincial, regional and local agencies. These persons will be appointed
as "associate" Watersheds Coalition members by the Watersheds
Coalition upon recommendation of the working committees. Associate
members are not required to be residents of the watershed. Associate
members are welcome and encouraged to attend all Watersheds Coalition
meetings and participate at the discretion of the Watersheds Coalition
Chair during committee reports and at other times, as appropriate.
184
4.3.2 Committee Chair
The Chair of each committee will be a Watersheds Coalition member.
The Chairs will be responsible for addressing and implementing the
Terms of Reference and reporting to the Watersheds Coalition on a
regular basis.
4.3.3 Terms of Reference for Working Committees
Initial Terms of Reference will be developed by Authority staff for
distribution to the Watersheds Coalition prior to its first meeting. Terms
of Reference will be developed and approved by the Watersheds
Coalition for each committee established.
4.3.4 Work Plans
The committees will develop annual work plans. These work plans will
contain resource plans required to support the proposed activities based
on the Terms of Reference. -
4.4 Other Resources
Funding may be available for projects and activities of working committees
based on approved work plans and available Authority funding. Working
committee members are encouraged to secure other resources and
partnerships for Watersheds Coalition projects and activities, whenever
possible. In -kind or other support for projects and activities will be welcome
from businesses, industries, other government agencies, private foundations,
educational institutions and others in accordance with TRCA policies. All in -kind
or other support will be coordinated with or through the Conservation
Foundation of Greater Toronto.
5_0 COMPENSATION OF WATERSHEDS COALITION MEMBERS
At regular Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Coalition meetings, as well as working committee
meetings, members will be eligible for travel expenses according to Authority policy. Associate
members of working committees are also eligible for travel expenses, where these are not
covered by their agency.
6.0 RULES OF CONDUCT
The Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Coalition will adhere to the TRCA's Rules of Conduct,
• Policies and Procedures, as adopted by Resolution #3 of Authority meeting #2/86, or as may
be amended. A quorum will consist of a majority of the members of the Etobicoke - Mimico
Watersheds Coalition.
185
7_0 TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition shall:
• initiate and recommend to the Authority and other partners, regeneration and stewardship
projects and activities in consultation with the local and regional municipalities, Toronto and
Region Remedial Action Plan, and other watershed stakeholders that will lead to the
realization of the vision for the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watersheds and implement
Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks,
including the 2001 Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card.
• act as the Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek watersheds champion in large projects that
cross municipal boundaries and support major projects advocated by others which will
respect, protect and regenerate the Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek watersheds;
• develop and promote events which celebrate the watersheds;
• provide a forum for watershed communication;
• continue to promote the Etobicoke - Mimico Pledge to municipal councils, agencies,
businesses, community organizations and others throughout the watershed;
• support local community groups;
• in conjunction with the TRCA and others, host technical forums leading to improvements in
planning and practice, throughout the watershed;
• inform watershed communities about regeneration through public meetings, publications,
displays and events;
• develop the second Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card scheduled for publication in 2004;
• undertake fund- raising initiatives to support watershed group initiatives;
• develop community action area plans and appropriate site plans within the watersheds;
• investigate the development of a strategy indicator related to "Quality of Life ";
• consult and involve individuals, interest groups, communities, businesses, industry and
government agencies in the realization of the vision for the Etobicoke Creek and Mimico
Creek watersheds;
• assist in gaining financial and in -kind resources;
• adhere to the basic principles of sound ecosystem management that recognizes the
interrelationship between, and integration of, natural systems, human influences, education
and stewardship, required for improving the health of the watersheds.
186
RES. #839/02 - THE SUSTAINABLE WATER AND SEWAGE SYSTEMS ACT 2001,
BILL 155, AND THE CITY OF TORONTO'S WATER AND
WASTEWATER UTILITY STUDY
Comments on two important management initiatives.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the position of Conservation Ontario
regarding Bill 155, the proposed "Sustainable Water and Sewage Systems Act 2001 ", be
endorsed;
THAT the regional and area municipalities be requested to support Conservation
Ontario's position that full cost pricing include provisions for watershed management
outcomes;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Toronto be requested to include, within the study of
Water and Wastewater Governance,- appropriate provisions for funding of the protection,
monitoring and restoration of surface and ground water resources on a watershed basis
as a fundamental requirement of full cost pricing of water and wastewater services.
AMENDMENT
RES. #B40/02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THAT the seconded paragraph of the main motion be replaced with the following:
THAT the Regional and Area municipalities that are affected by Bill 155 be requested to
support Conservation Ontario's position that full cost pricing include provisions for
watershed management activities;
THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED
THE-MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Province of Ontario has given first reading to Bill 155, the proposed "Sustainable Water
and Sewage Systems Act, 2001. The intent of the Act is summarized below.
"This legislation would require all owners of water and sewer systems (mainly municipalities) to
undertake a detailed analysis of their water and sewer systems. This would include a full -cost
accounting of all operating and capital cost, all sources of revenue, and the investment
required to maintain and expand their systems.
187
This would also include the development of a comprehensive asset management plan, which
includes plans for moving to full -cost recovery. This plan would be submitted to the Minister of
Municipal Affairs and Housing who will have the authority to approve, reject or change the plan.
Details will be provided through regulations."
A number of Conservation Authorities and other agencies have raised concerns that the
proposed Act makes no provisions for the funding of watershed management activities within ,
the definition of full cost pricing. Further, the Act could potentially be interpreted to preclude
financing of such measures from the water rate for water and wastewater services.
Conservation Ontario proposes to comment to the Province of Ontario on behalf of all
Conservation Authorities by emphasizing three key points:
• Conservation Ontario requests that Bill 155 specifically reference watershed management
as an eligible component of full -cost accounting for water and wastewater services.
• In particular, but not limited to this, full cost accounting must include the cost of watershed
infrastructure that provides the source of water supply or improves wastewater assimilative
capacity of the receiver, including that infrastructure that is operated by the Conservation
Authorities on behalf of one or several municipalities.
• Additionally, municipalities should be able to include costs associated with design, capital
construction, operation and maintenance of storm water management facilities which
reduce pollutants to source waters.
The City of Toronto has commissioned a study to look at alternative forms of governance for
the provision of water and wastewater services. The rational for the City of Toronto's study is
the concern that the existing system is not generating sufficient funding to provide for adequate
expansion, maintenance and replacement of the extensive system of infrastructure necessary
for the supply, treatment, and distribution of potable water and the collection, treatment and
dilution of wastewaters. For several years, the City of Toronto has recognized The connection
between the provision of water and waste services and the protection of surface and ground
water. The City of Toronto has provided funding to TRCA for groundwater studies, watershed
monitoring, erosion control as a component of storm water management, and other watershed
management activities from the water rate. It is very important for the ongoing viability of the
Authority's watershed management activities that funds from the water rate continue to be
available regardless of the management structure which might be selected for the provision of
water and wastewater services.
Report prepared by: Brian Denney, 416- 667 -6290
For Information contact: Brian Denney, 416- 667 -6290
Date: May 03, 2002
1
188
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES: #841/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in •
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; '
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.1 - 8.1.20, and 8.1.26 - 8.1.27, inclusive), which are listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF TORONTO [EAST YORK COMMUNITY]
8:1.1 PAUL SANNELLA & CATHY DALEY
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 114, Plan D -135, (27 'Lewis-Street), in the City of
Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don'River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Paul Sannella & Cathy Daley.
The purpose is to alter an existing structure (garage /storage area) in the floodplain associated
with the Lower Don River Special Policy area, in order to repair and replace damaged walls,
roof, footings and foundations.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Survey, Site Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations, Prepared by Richard Berta of R.B.
Construction Design, dated July 2001, received March 18, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
189
Proposal:
The proposal is to renovate an existing structure (garage /storage area) located within the
Lower Don River SPA. The proposed works include repairing and replacing existing damaged
walls, roof, footings and foundation on an existing garage and storage area. Grades and
building size to remain the same.
Control of Flooding:
The size of the existing structure will not increase as a result of the proposed works, therefore
the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be decreased. The building itself will be
floodproofed to the level of the Regional Flood.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located approximately 400 meters (1300 feet) from the Don River.
The majority of property improvements will be located inside of the garage. Sedimentation is
expected to reach the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is located within a flat area associated with the Lower Don River SPA.
The proposed works are consistent with existing development along the corridor reach. There
are no significant resource features or Iandforms associated with this site.
Policy Guidelines:
The subject works are consistent with Section 4.2.1. (B) - Development/Redevelopment
Guidelines within Designated Two Zone and Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33066
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: April 4, 2002
Application #: 130/02/TOR
8.1.2 CITY OF TORONTO
To place fill within a regulated area on (Kings' Mill Park), in the City of Toronto
(Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the remediation of impacts of
leachate from the former Upper Riverwood Landfill and the Lower Riverwood Landfill areas.
The works include the placement of approximately 7,000 cubic metres of fill to cover several
low lying pockets of ponded leachate with a depth of 1 to 1.5 metres of imported clean fill and
the installation of subsurface drains and pump stations to collect subsurface effluent in order to
prevent contaminated groundwater from the former landfill sites from entering the Humber
River.
The permit will be issued for the period of April 5, 2002 to April 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
190
• Upper Riverwood Landill Area, General Plan, Drawing No. 1152 -817, and Lower
Riverwood Landfill Area, General Plan, Drawing No. 1152 -641, submitted by City of
Toronto Solid Waste Management Services, date received March 27, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the remediation of impacts of
leachate from the former Upper Riverwood Landfill and the Lower Riverwood Landfill areas
which has pooled into several low lying pockets, caused by differential settlement and
infiltration of water into the subsurface waste. The proposal involves covering the pockets of
leachate with a depth of 1.0 to 1.5 metres of clean fill, to a total of approximately 3000 cubic
metres of imported fill in the Upper Riverwood Landfill area and approximately 4000 cubic
metres of imported fill in the Lower Riverwood Landfill area. Subsurface drains and pump
stations will be installed to remove subsurface effluent from the site which will be transported to
the sanitary sewer system at the Humber Water Pollution Control Plant for treatment. The
works have commenced as emergency works prior to the submission of the application to the
Executive Committee for approval.
Control of'Floodinq:
The proposed fill placement is not located within the Regional Storm floodplain associated with
the Humber River and accordingly, there will be no impacts to the control or conveyance of
flooding.
Pollution:
The proposed site grading and installation of two pumping stations to collect subsurface
effluent will improve both surface water runoff and eliminate water ponding, potentially
improving water quality in the Humber River. Sediment and erosion control measures will be
installed and maintained until all disturbed areas are grassed.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are not expected to impact on any significant resource features and all
disturbed areas will be restored. Delivery of the material to the sites will be restricted to arterial
roads where possible. There are no geotechnical /slope stability or fisheries issues associated
with the project. The proposed works will improve water quality in the Humber River by
diverting leachate impacted groundwater from the underlying landfill to the sanitary sewer
system for treatment at the City's Humber Treatment Plant.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32965
Report Prepared by Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 18, 2002
191
Application #: 078/02/TOR
8.1.3 JOHN LYONS
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 14, Plan 1940, (12 Stonegate Road), in the City
of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by John Lyons.
The purpose is to construct a new structure in the floodplain and place fill in a regulated area of
the Humber River to stabilize an existing slope and protect against further riverbank erosion.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Cross - Sectional and Aerial Site Plans, Slope Stabilization Species List, submitted by
the applicant, date received January 17, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To construct a gabion structure in the Regional Storm floodplain associated with the lower
Humber River, in order to prevent the further erosion of the riverbank of a private residential
property. Construction will consist of hand building gabion baskets measuring 1 meter (3 feet)
high by 12 meters (40 feet) long, at the toe of slope of the rear of a private residential property.
Neighboring properties have constructed similar protection works.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are to be set back from the waters edge, and cut into the toe of the slope,
thereby not intruding into the river or decreasing the storage capacity of the floodplain. The
proposed works are not expected to affect the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
Filter cloth will be permanently installed between the new gabions and the slope area in order
to prevent sediment from washing through and reaching the watercourse. The works will be
undertaken by hand, with no heavy equipment, during low water levels. There will be no works
within the watercourse itself.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will assist in protecting the existing slope from further erosion caused by
motor boating in the lower Humber River. These works will not impact on any significant
resource features, and are consistent with existing uses along the corridor reach. There are no
geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.4.2. (E) - Property Improvements - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
192
CFN: 32840
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: January 22, 2002
Application #: 029/02/TOR
8.1.4 LAURA ROBERTSON
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 5, Plan 3347, (51 Riverview Heights),
in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Laura Robertson.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Humber River in order to
facilitate the construction of an above - ground swimming pool.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and 'plans which form part of this permit:
• Survey, Site Plan, submitted by the applicant, received April 12, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Pi-oposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Humber River, in order to
facilitate the construction of a new above ground swimming pool. Approximately 1 meter (3
feet) of soil will be'excavated, with the pool being placed partially within the excavated area.
This will be done in order to bring the height of the pool closer to the ground.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located entirely outside of the Regional Floodplain and are not
expected to affect the storage and conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located approximately 20 meters from the Regional Storm Floodplain
associated with the Humber River. A well treed slope and valleyland separates the works from
theriver. Sedimentation as a result of construction is not expected to reach the river.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on flat tableland, approximately 10 meters from the top of
bank. Staff have visited the site, and have determined that there are no significant resource
features or slope stabilit■/geotechnical issues associated with this project.
Policy.Guidelin s:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
193
CFN: 33091
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: April 16, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO [HUMBER YORK COMMUNITY]
Application #: 145/02/TOR
8.1.5 SUSAN WATT
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 205, Plan 1686, (11 Kingsway Crescent),
in the City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council Area), Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Susan Watt.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Humber River, in order to
facilitate a new addition to an existing home.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Section A, Survey, prepared by Peter Higgins Architect, dated March 25,
2002. Date received March 26, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Humber River in order to
facilitate the construction of a new addition to an existing home on flat tableland, more than 12
meters from the top of bank.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm floodplain associated with the
Humber River, therefore the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located on flat tableland, approximately 20 meters (65 feet) from the
watercourse. The slope to the Humber is well vegetated and extends down into the valley park
system, comprised of roads, bike paths and manicured lawn. Sedimentation as a result of
construction is not expected.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on flat tableland, approximately 12 meters from the top of
bank, on lands previously-modified to accommodate the existing home. The works are not
located near any significant resource features and are consistent with existing development
along the corridor reach.
194
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33049
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: March 27, 2002
Application #: 118/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO [MIDTOWN COMMUNITY]
8.1.6 SERGE ROZIN
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 11, 13, Lot 12, Plan, (109 Donwoods Drive),
in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Serge Rozin.
The purpose is to excavate and regrade in a regulated area associated with the Don River, in
order to facilitate the demolition of the existing dwelling, and the construction of a new single
family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Drawings A2 -A9,_ Survey, Prepared by Peter Higgins Architect, dated
February 5, received March 1, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and regrade in a regulated area of the Don River, in order to
facilitate the demolition and construction of a new single family dwelling.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Don
River, therefore the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located more than 210 meters (689 feet), from the Regional Storm
Floodplain associated with the Don River. No sedimentation of the watercourse is expected as
a result of the proposed works.
Conservation of Land: Y approximately 5 meters (16 feet),
The proposed works are located within the valley system, app Y
from the toe of slope. The proposed works will not impact any significant resource features,
and is consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. There are no
geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with this project.
195
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authorities
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32998
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: March 5, 2002
Application #: 096/02/TOR
8.1.7 TORONTO FRENCH SCHOOL
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Plan 66R- 10759, (296
Lawrence Avenue East), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area),
Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Toronto French School.
The purpose is to construct 2 stormwater outfall structures, place fill and conduct associated
site grading to facilitate the construction of major additions and parking facilities on the Toronto
French School campus.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan /Context Plan (Drawing A -001); Site Servicing and Grading Plan - East Side
(Drawing TFS -SG1); Site Servicing and Grading Plan - West Side (Drawing TFS -SG3);
Don River Storm Water Outlet (Drawing TFS -SG2); Detail Drawings (Drawing TFS -D1),
prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates Limited (Project 5251), all dated revised to
March 5, 2002.
• Landscape Grading - West Site (Drawing TFS- L109); Landscape Grading - East Site
(Drawing TFS- L110); Landscape Planting - West Site (Drawing TFS- L112); Landscape
Planting - East Site (Drawing TFS- L113), Landscape North /East Site Tree Removals
and Restoration Plan (TFS- L114), prepared by Hough Woodland Haylor Dance
Leinster, all dated revised to April 4, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking from R.V. Anderson Limited, dated April 23, 2002, confirming
applicants intention to address minor landscaping revisions.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct 2 stormwater outfall structures and to place fill and associated site
grading within a Regulated Area of the Don River, to facilitate a major expansion of the Toronto
French School campus. The property is located adjacent to the Don River Valley and all works
will maintain a minimum 10m setback from the top -of -bank, except for the storm outfall
infrastructure. Both proposed outfall structures will utilize existing infrastructure where
appropriate, and will make the appropriate improvements to correct and mitigate existing
erosion problems. The overall development scenario has been reviewed in conjunction with
196
City.of Toronto Site Plan application SPC 2001 0038 which has been approved. The Authority
had previously approved Permit C -01282 on November 2, 2001, which'represented the initial
grading and servicing requirements for construction staging. The current application includes
the detailed engineering for the storm outfall, final grading and restoration plans. These works
represent only those within the TRCA Regulated Area and do not incorporate associated
building additions which have been reviewed under the Site Plan application process.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and
the proposed stormwater outfall utilizes an existing headwall. Accordingly, there will be no
impacts on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be installed at all work areas to prevent sediment from entering
the watercourse and valley. The works also include improvements to an existing outfall
structure to address existing erosion problems within the valley corridor.
Conservation of Land:
The applicants have commissioned detailed geotechnical reports through the site plan review
process, and have demonstrated to the satisfaction of staff that no adverse impacts to slope
stability exist, or will result as part of this proposal. Detailed restoration and landscape
enhancement plans have been produced to the satisfaction of staff Which both restore all
disturbed areas, and shall enhance the 10rri buffer setback area with appropriate species and
densities of native vegetation to complement the integrity of the adjacent valley corridor.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.1 - New Development -
Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33068
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, exte'rision 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: April 4, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO [SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY]
of the Authority's Valley and
Application #: 133/02/TOR
8.1.8 BRIDGENORTH EQUITIES INC.
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 27, 28, Concession D,
(1025 Kennedy Road), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council
Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Bridgenorth
Equities Inc.
The purpose is to construct a stormwater management pond and associated storm outfall
structure partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain, and the construction of a sanitary
sewer line across Southwest Highland Creek.
197
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2007 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• City of Toronto, 1025 Kennedy Road Easement, Drawing No. P -106, prepared by G.M.
Sernas & Associates, dated April, 2001, date received March 1, 2002.
• Lawrence Village, Stormwater Management Pond, Planting & Creek Restoration Plan,
and Landscape Details, Sheet Nos. PD -1 and PD -2, prepared by Alexander Budrevics
Associates Limited, revision date April 22, 2002, date received April 23, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the construction of a stormwater management pond and associated
storm outfall structure partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Highland Creek and the
construction of a sanitary sewer line across Southwest Highland Creek to facilitate the,
development of the Lawrence and Kennedy subdivision on the former Ontario Hydro lands.
The location and design of the stormwater management facility were approved through the
subdivision review process. The proposed development also requires a temporary
construction access across Southwest Highland Creek.
Control of Flooding:
The stormwater outfall structure and sanitary sewer line will maintain existing grades within the
Regional Storm Floodplain. The creek crossing will include the installation of a culvert to
maintain flows during the proposed 2 day construction access period, and will then be
removed and existing grades re- established. The proposed works will therefore have no
impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
The stormwater water management facility has been designed for both quality and quantity
control. Detailed sediment and erosion control measures have been included with the design
of the SWM facility and the creek crossing.
Conservation of Land:
The drainage area to be treated in the proposed stormwater management facility is
approximately 9.28 ha. The pond site is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain,
while the outfall structure and sanitary sewer line are partially within the floodplain. Detailed
landscaping, restoration and planting enhancement plans have been prepared to restore all
areas disturbed in conjunction with the development, with particular emphasis on the creek
crossing. Works will conform to the warmwater fisheries construction timing guidelines which
require instream works to be done during the period July 1st to March 31st.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
198
CFN: 32534.A
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 21, 2001
Application #: 262/01/TOR
8.1.9 CONNIE & JOHN KENNEDY
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 15, Plan M -639, (32 Hopecrest Crescent), in the
City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Connie & John Kennedy.
The purpose is to demolish an existing chain link fence and erect a new chain link fence within
the Regional Storm Floodplain of Massey Taylor Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Survey Plan prepared by King and Coons Surveyors, date received April 15, 2002.
Fence Layout Sketch prepared by McFaul Fencing Ltd., dated April 12, 2002, date
received April 15, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to demolish an existing chain Zink backyard fence and replace it with a new 1.5
m. high chain link fence in the identical location. The new fencing will enclose the applicant's
backyard, running along the rear property line as well as along the side lot lines, shared by
adjacent neighbours on both sides. The old fencing is collapsing and has several large holes.
The landowner has been covering the holes with board planking in an attempt to contain the
family dog within the backyard as well as to prevent neighbouring dogs from entering the
property.
Control of Flooding:
Although the new chain Zink fence will be located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, it will
be erected in the identical location as the existing chain link fencing. Therefore, the proposed
works will not result in any increase in risk of flooding or impacts on storage or conveyance.
Neighbouring properties also have backyard fencing within the floodplain.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected from these works as there will be minimal excavation required
for the fence posts.
199
Conservation of Land:
The rear fence line will be located approximately 12 metres from the watercourse and
approximately 8 metres from the top of channel bank. The new chain link fencing replaces an
old chain link fence which is collapsing and will be erected in the identical location. The
proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features, will maintain existing
grades, and is consistent with existing uses within the corridor reach. There are no
geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.2 (D) - Replacement Structures - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33092
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: April 16, 2002
Application #: 144/02/TOR
8.1.10 NARINDERPAL BHATTAL
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 2, Plan 3499, (573 Meadowvale Road), in
the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by Narinderpal Bhattal.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of Highland Creek to facilitate the
construction of a new single - family residence on a vacant lot.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Lot Drainage & House Siting Control Plan prepared by Clarke & Wilkinson Surveying
Ltd., dated April 19, 2002, date received April 22, 2002.
• Basement /Foundation Plan, Ground Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan, West Elevation,
South Elevation, East Elevation, North Elevation, Roof Plan and Floor Area
Calculation, Cross Section, and Cross Section Details, submitted by applicant, date
received April 22, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the construction of a new single - family residence on a vacant lot situated
partially within the regulated area of Highland Creek. The lot was created through a severance
application that TRCA staff reviewed in March 2002.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with
Highland Creek, therefore the proposed development will not impact on the storage or
conveyance of flood waters.
200
Pollution:
The proposed works will not result in the sedimentation of the watercourse, as the property is
located approximately 100 metres from the watercourse, with White Avenue being situated
between the property and the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is located on the north side of White Avenue adjacent to an existing
residence on the tableland, approximately 50 metres from the top of bank and 100 metres from
the watercourse. Residential development exists on both the north and the south side of the
street, with the southerly lots abutting the watercourse. No significant resource features will be
impacted by the proposed works and there are no slope stability issues related to the works.
The proposal is consistent with existing development within the corridor reach.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (G) - Infilling - of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33135
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: April 23, 2002
Application #: 157/02/TOR
8.1.11 ONTARIO HERITAGE FOUNDATION
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Block A, Plan 1734, (1 Meadowcliffe
Drive), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront
Watershed as located on the property owned by Ontario Heritage Foundation.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area associated with the Lake Ontario
Waterfront, in order to facilitate the construction of a 4 meter by .08 meter (16 foot by 2 foot)
addition to an existing building.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -lined Revised Site Plan deleting parking area, Section A -A, First Floor Plan,
Prepared by Alan Seymour, dated June 2001. Date received April 5, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To excavate and place fill in a regulated area associated with the Lake Ontario Waterfront, in
order to facilitate the construction of a 4 meter by .08 meter (16ft by 2ft) addition to an existing
building.
201
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within a Regional Storm Floodplain area, and will
therefore not affect the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on flat tableland, more than 20 meters (66 feet) from
the top of bank. There will be minimal excavation. Sedimentation as a result of construction is
not expected.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features, will maintain existing
grades,-and is consistent with existing uses on the property. There are no geotechnical /slope
stability issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This oroposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33132
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: April 23, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 155/02/TOR
8.1.12 ANDREW DEL RICCIO
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 136, Plan 65M 3094, (189 Sierra Court), in the
City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Andrew
Del Riccio.
The purpose is to construct a new home and pool within an approved subdivision, partially
within the fill regulated area of the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• House for Andrew and Kim Del Riccio red line revised on April 18, 2002
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to construct a new single family dwelling and pool partially within the
Fill Regulated Area of the Don River. The subject property is the last vacant lot on the street in
an approved residential subdivision. The home is scheduled to be built this summer, and the
pool is scheduled to be built next spring. A tributary of the Don River flows behind the house,
202
and the proposed pool will be located more than 10 metres from the regional storm flood plain.
Both pool and house are sufficiently setback from the stream corridor.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are outside of the regional storm flood plain, and therefore there will be
no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution
A sediment fence will be erected prior to construction and will remain until the works are
complete.
Conservation of Land:
The property is located within a developed portion of the Don River valley. The subject
property is currently a residential lot, and there are no resource features or geotechnical issues
associated with the property.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.1, New Urban Development, of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33130
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Patricia Young, extension 5324
Date: April 22, 2002
Application #: 154 /02/VAUG
8.1.13 CATHY BAGNOLI
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Concession 8 Lot 67, Plan 65M -2934,
(16 Filomena Court), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Cathy Bagnoli.
The purpose is to excavate fill material in conjunction with the installation of an in- ground
swimming pool, within the fill regulated area of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• In- ground pool Installation, construction notes dated April 22, 2002.
• Pool drawing, received by TRCA on April 23, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating fill material as part of the installation of an in- ground
swimming pool. The subject property is partially within the fill regulated area of the Humber
River within a subdivision. The back yard is currently sodded. The proposed pool is over 30
metres from the watercourse and sufficiently set back from the stream corridor.
203
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the regional storm flood plain, there will be no impact
on flooding.
Pollution:
No pollution is expected as the works will not exceed beyond the rear fence, the watercourse is
over 30 metres away from the works, and the land in between is vegetated. Furthermore all
excavated sediment will be removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope stability issues and no significant resource features will be impacted by the
proposed works. All disturbed areas will sodded when works are complete.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33107
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Patricia Young, extension 5324
Date: April 19, 2002
Application #: 150 /02/VAUG
8.1.14 COPPER CREEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
To alter a waterway on Lot 28, 29, Concession 8, (11191 Highway 27), in the City of
Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Copper
Creek Limited Partnership.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse to facilitate the modification of an existing water intake
structure on the East Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing No.: W7, dated received April 5, 2002, prepared by Phillips Engineering.
• Letter submission providing updated documentation regarding water intake sill
elevation, dated March 26, 2002, prepared by Phillips Engineering.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to alter an existing water intake structure on the East Humber River. The works
include construction of a concrete bottom or sill on the existing intake structure. The sill
controls the amount of water which can be removed from the river and the elevation has been
established in accordance with TRCA's "Protocol for Defining Water Taking Requirements
204
within the TRCA ". This protocol, developed in partnership with the Ministry of Environment
(MOE) specifies establishing the invert of the designed water taking intake mechanism above
the 60 % duration flow (i.e. base flow). The base flow is defined as the flow rate that is equaled
or exceeded 60% of the time (the 60% duration flow). Prior to use of the structure for water
taking the proponent is required to obtain a Permit To Take Water from the Ministry of
Environment. A temporary permit was issued last summer (2001) for the golf course and the
applicant will be seeking a long term permit this year (2002). The existing intake structure was
constructed as part of the golf course construction.
Control of Flooding:
The project will maintain the existing floodplain grades and therefore will not impact on the
storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Erosion control measures will be used during construction and the work area will be isolated to
prevent sediment from entering the Humber River.
Conservation of Land:
Potential impacts to fish habitat can be mitigated through 1) the use of a coffer dam system to
isolate'the work area and 2) by completing the works in the cold water timing window (June 15
to September 15). _On this basis, the works are considered a mitigatable HADD (Harmful,
Alteration Disruption or Destruction) and authorization by the Department of Fisheries and
Oceans is not required.
Policy Guidelines,:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32696
Report Prepared by: Chris Hibberd, extension 5281
For information contact: Chris Hibberd, extension 5281
Date: December 6, 2001
Application #: 357 /01/VAUG
8.1.15 DENIS BERTUaO
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 24, Concession 8, (15 Howland Mill Road, RR 1),
in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Denis Bertuzzo.
The purpose is to replace 'an above - ground pool structure with an in- ground pool structure
within the floodplain and Regulated area of the'Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, prepared by Denis Bertuzzo, dated April 2, 2002 and accompanying
Sediment Control fencing detail.
205
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to replace an existing above - ground swimming pool with an inground
swimming pool and 60 sq. ft. cabana, and associated grading and landscaping, within the
floodplain and Regulated Area of the Humber River. The construction area will not exceed the
current built area on the property.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works will maintain existing grades and will therefore not affect the control of
flooding
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing is to be installed adjacent to the Humber River to prevent sediment
from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposal will not result in the removal of vegetation or the expansion of current built area
and will have no impacts on the watercourse and floodplain.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.2.2.D - Existing Development, Property
Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program policies:
CFN: 33083
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: April 11, 2002
Application #: 140 /02/VAUG
8.1.16 ENBRIDGE CONSUMERS GAS
To place fill within a regulated area on (5859 Rutherford Road), in the City of
Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Enbridge
Consumers Gas.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in the fill regulated area of the Humber River to
facilitate the installation of a NPS 1 ST IP gas pipeline beneath Rutherford Road and to connect
to 5859 Rutherford Road. The pipeline will be installed using directional drilling.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan showing an NPS 1 ST IP gas service crossing, Rutherford Road to service 5859
Rutherford Road, dated March 29, 2002 prepared by Enbridge Consumers Gas.
206
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in the fill regulated area of the Humber River to
facilitate the installation of a gas pipeline beneath Rutherford Road and to connect to a home
located at 5859 Rutherford Road. The pipeline will be connected to an existing pipeline that
runs parallel to Rutherford Road which in this location crosses the Humber River. The existing
home is within the flood plain and gains access off Rutherford Road. The pipeline will be
installed along the existing access route to the residence and will not further impact the valley
corridor.
Control of Flooding:
The home is entirely within the flood plain. As the proposed pipeline will be installed using
directional drilling, the control of flooding will not be affected by the proposed works. No
material will be stockpiled within the floodplain and existing grades will be maintained.
Pollution
The proposed works are 90 metres from the watercourse, and the pipeline will be installed
using directional drillinc. All boreholes will be restored to the original condition or better,
therefore no sedimentalon is expected.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are 90 metres from the watercourse. No natural features will be affected
by the proposed works, and all impacted areas will be restored. There are no fisheries
concerns or geotechnical concerns related to this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33134
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Patricia Young, extension 5324
Date: April 23, 2002
Application #: 156 /02NAUG
8.1.17 THE TORONTO BOARD OF TRADE COUNTRY CLUB
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10, Concession
8, (300 Clarence Street), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by The Toronto Board of Trade Country Club.
The purpose is to upgrade a septic system in the fill regulated area of the Humber River, and
replace a connection pipe between the existing rest stop and the new septic system. The
connection pipe will be partially within the flood plain of the Humber River, and the existing
holding tank that is in the flood plain will be removed.
207
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Fax dated April 19, 2002 signed by Chris Lecour detailing sediment fence installation.
• Drawing of the sediment fence location received by fax on April 17, 2002.
• Fax from Chris Lecour dated April 17, 2002 stating the type of sewage treatment
system (Class 4) that will be used, and describing details of re- vegetation, and the
exact location of the sediment fence (accompanied by location indicated on TRCA
flood plain map).
• Site Plan and Sewage System Evaluation Board of Trade Golf Club, received by TRCA
on March 22, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To upgrade a septic system in the fill regulated area of the Humber River, and replace a
connection pipe between the existing rest stop and the new septic system of the Toronto
Board of Trade Golf Course. The existing rest stop is in the floodplain of the Humber River, the
proposed connection pipe will be partially within the flood plain of the Humber River, and the
septic system will be located outside of the flood plain. The existing holding tank currently
located in the floodplain will be removed. The subject property currently operates as a golf
course.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed septic system will be located outside of the regional storm flood plain, and the
connecting pipe will be located below ground, therefore there will be no impact on the storage
or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be erected prior to construction and will remain until the works are
complete and the area has been sodded to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse. The
existing sewage holding tank that is currently located within the flood plain will be removed.
Conservation of Land:
The property is located in an area currently used as a golf course. The proposed works will not
affect any significant features, as there are no geotechnical, fisheries or natural heritage issues
associated with the project. Furthermore, the proposed septic system is 50 metres further from
the river than the current holding tank.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33051
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Patricia Young, extension 5324
Date: April 2, 2002
208
Application #: 119 /02/VAUG
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
8.1.18 KONSTANTIN LITVAK
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Plan 65M -3371, (25 Geranium Court),
in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Konstantin Litvak.
The purpose is to excavate fill material associated with the installation of an in- ground
swimming pool within the fill regulated area of the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Details of the retaining wall submitted to TRCA on March 11, 2002.
• Details of the pool and location of the retaining wall submitted to TRCA on March 11,
2002.
• E -mail from K. and I. Litvak indicating that all disturbed areas will be sodded dated
April 24, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating fill material as part of the installation of an in- ground
swimming pool in a sodded area of a back yard in an approved subdivision. A 70 cm retaining
wall will also be built behind the concrete deck of the pool. The subject property is partially
within the fill regulated area of the Don River. The lands are not situated within the regional
storm flood plain and are sufficiently set back from the top of bank. There are no geotechnical
issues associated with the proposal. The current application has been submitted to rectify a
violation of TRCA policy, as the pool has already been excavated.
Control of Flooding:
Since the subject property is not located within the regional storm flood plain, there will be no
impacts on flooding.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from these works as they are located 40 metres from the river.
All excavated material will be removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope stability issues related to the works. In addition, no significant resource
features will be impacted by the proposed works; all disturbed areas are to be restored
following construction.
209
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33025
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Patricia Young, extension 5324
Date: March 18, 2002
Application #: 114/02/RH
8.1.19 SUE MASSA
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 95, Plan 240, (229 Lakeland Crescent), in the
Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Sue Massa.
The purpose is to construct in a flood plain, excavate and place fill within the Regional Storm
Flood Plain and Fill Regulated Area of the East Humber River Lake Wilcox area and the Oak
Ridges Special Policy Area to facilitate construction of a single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004.
• Site and proposed grading plan of Part of Lots 94 and 95 Registered Plan 240
Township of Richmond Hill prepared by R. D. Tomlinson Limited and dated February
18, 2002.
• Architectural Plans prepared by The Rosedale Group for the S. Massa Residence,
drawings A-4, A -5, A -6 and A -7.
• Letter from R. D. Tomlinson, Ontario Land Surveyor dated March 25, 2002 stating
there will be no openings of doors and windows lower than 295.6 mast.
• Letter of undertaking dated March 28, 2002 signed by Sue Massa.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and filling material as part of the construction of a single
family dwelling. The entire property is located within the Regional storm flood plain and Fill
Regulated area of the East Humber River at Lake Wilcox as well as the Oak Ridges Special
Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed house will be flood proofed to above the Regional Storm and all excavated
material will be removed from the site, therefore the control of flooding will not be affected by
the proposed works.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be installed prior to construction and will remain until the area is
re- vegetated and construction is complete.
210
Conservation of Land:
No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works; all disturbed areas
will be re- vegetated following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development within established Special Policy
Areas of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32975
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Patricia Young, extension 5324
Date: February 27, 2002
TOWN OF WHITCHURCH - STOUFFVILLE
Application #: 091/02/RH
8.1.20 REGION OF YORK
To alter a waterway on Part Lot 31, 32, 33, 34, Concession 8 , Part Lot 32, 33, 34,
. Concession 9, in -the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville, Rouge River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Region of York.
The purpose is to construct in the Regional Storm Floodplain and alter a Watercourse to
facilitate the construction of the Ninth Line Sanitary Sewer Extension to Stouffville - crossings
are required along two- tributaries of the Little Rouge and the Stouffville Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Ninth Line Sanitary Trunk Sewer Extension Drawing Nos. P -W3, P -W6, P -E6, D -2,
prepared by URS Cole Sherman, revised as received on March 8, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
As part of the-coristruction of the new sanitary sewer extension to Whitchurch- Stouffville the
Region of York proposes to cross tributaries of the Little Rouge (West Branch) and the
Stouffville Creek. The works are being conducted in accordance with an approved
Environmental Assessment and will allow for the future expansion of the Town of Stouffville and
the decommissioning of the existing Stouffville Treatment Plant. A separate permit will be
required for the plant decommissioning. This portion of the sewer will run from the existing
Stouffville treatment plant through agricultural areas slated for development and will eventually
connect to the sanitary sewer being constructed along Sixteenth Avenue. A section of the
sanitary sewer will follow the Little Rouge and will be partially the Regional Storm Floodplain
and Fill Regulated Area, however, the alignment is sufficiently setback from the tributary and
the associated riparian vegetation. Crossings of two tributaries to the Little Rouge and their
211
associated floodplain are required and a crossing of Stouffville Creek is also required. The
crossings are being constructed through the Jack and Bore method and will not impact the
tributaries and the associated riparian corridor. The bore pits will be restored to original grade.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not impact the control of flooding as all areas will be restored to original grade.
Some dewatering is anticipated along the route and filtration bags will be placed at the outlet
pipe from the dewatering device.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be erected between the jack and bore pits and the watercourse and
associated riparian zone. Sediment fencing will also be erected along sections adjacent to the
Little Rouge Creek. The pits will be removed and the area restored to original grade once the
works are complete.
Conservation of Land:
The tributary crossings are being constructed through the Jack and Bore method and will not
impact the tributaries and the associated riparian corridor. The bore pits will be restored to
original grade. The sewer alignment along the west branch of the Little Rouge Creek has been
located to avoid any significant vegetation and although partially within the Regional Storm
Floodplain is located mainly within agricultural areas. The construction easement has been
located on the east side of the sewer alignment and away from the watercourse to avoid
impacts to the riparian vegetation and allowing the construction works to be staged from the
open fields. Maintenance access roads and manhole locations have also been designed to
avoid interference with the tributary crossings. All disturbed areas will be restored in
accordance with details provided by the applicant.
Dewatering is anticipated to be minimal through this section of the sewer installation given that
the depths of the sewer is between 3 and 9 metres and not in excess of 50 metres as in the
instance of downstream installations. The sewer line trench is also to be fitted with clay plugs to
ensure that the trench will not serve to convey ground water flows.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in accordance with section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. The works do not constitute a Harmful
Alteration Disruption or Destruction (HADD).
CFN: 32391
Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: June 26, 2001
212
Application #: 207/01/WS
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES: #842/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUAMT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.21 - 8.1.25, Inclusive), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items, for
which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8:1.21 MOON -MATZ LTD.
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area at
Loafer's Lake Park, in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located
on the property owned by City of Brampton.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the replacement of the
pedestrian bridge crossing the Etobicoke Creek at Loafer's Lake Park.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004.
• Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Plan, Drawing No. S -1, prepared by Moon -Matz Ltd.,
dated November 10, 2000, revised April 25, 2002.
• Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Demolition and Sedimentation Plan, Drawing No. S-2,
prepared by Moon -Matz Ltd., dated November 10, 2000, revised April 25, 2002:
• Pedestrian Bridge' Foundation and Deck Framing Plan and Sections and Details,
Drawing No. S -3, prepared by Moon -Matz Ltd., dated November 10, 2000, revised
April 25, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking confirming the span of the bridge and that works will not take
place within the watercourse, prepared by Way Miao of Moon Matz Ltd., dated April
25, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal: -
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a regulated area to facilitate the replacement of a
pedestrian bridge at Loafer's Lake Park over the Etobicoke Creek. The works include the
removal of the bridge structure, abutments, and asphalt walkway approaches to be replaced
with the same.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood water as the replacement bridge
with *maintain the same span width and the construction involves no importation of fill material.
All construction debris will be removed from the floodplain area.
213
Pollution:
Sediment control fences and sandbags will be installed and maintained during construction to
prevent the migration of sediment into the Etobicoke Creek.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features and all disturbed
areas will be restored. There will be no instream works and are no geotechnical or fisheries
issues related to the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32699
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: December 6, 2001
CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
Application #: 361 /01 /BRAM
8.1.22 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain west of Highway 407, south of
Matheson Boulevard East, in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed
as located on the property owned by City of Mississauga.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of three storm water
outfalls, a pedestrian trail, and a pedestrian crossing of the Etobicoke Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004.
• Pedestrian Bridge Section & Details, prepared by Winter Environmental Consulting,
sealed by A.E. Winter, dated December 4, 2001.
• Site Services and Engineering Plan, Drawing M1, dated October 27, 2001, prepared by
John George Associates.
• Site Services and Engineering Plan, Drawing M2, dated September 17, 2001, prepared
by John George Associates.
• Existing Conditions, Drawing L2, dated October 27, 2001, prepared by John George
Associates.
• Demolition and Removals Plans, Drawings L8 & L9, dated February 22, 2002,
prepared by John George Associates.
• Grading and Drainage Plan, Drawing L20, dated October 27, 2001, prepared by John
George Associates.
• Planting Plan, Drawing L31, dated January 16, 2002, prepared by John George
Associates.
• Letter of Undertaking to address outstanding seedmix concerns, dated April 24, 2002,
prepared by John George.
214
• Letter of Undertaking to address location of bridge abutments and surrounding
plantings, dated April 29, 2002, prepared by John George.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and placing fill material for the purpose of constructing
three storm drainage outfalls, a pedestrian trail, and a pedestrian crossing. The trail will run
along the creek near the edge of the stream corridor boundary more than 20 metres from the
watercourse beyond the projected meander belt. The trail will eventually align with the
pedestrian crossing of the creek. The location of the trail is void of tree cover and detailed
landscape plantings have been provided to mitigate against impacts of trail construction. The
outfall works will be located within the stream corridor and the regional storm flood plain
directing flows into the Etobicoke.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not significantly affect the storage or conveyance of flood water as the
importation of fill will be minimized and the bridge abutments will be located outside of the
100 -year flood elevation. All construction debris will be removed from the valley lands.
Pol lution:
Detailed sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during
construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not occur within the watercourse and will not impact on any significant
resource features. There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the project. All
disturbed areas will be restored upon completion of the works with native /non- invasive species.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32834
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: January 18, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 025 /02 /MISS
8.1.23 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on (Rutherford Road from .
Highway 27 to Weston Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York.
215
The purpose is to place fill a regulated area and alter a watercourse to facilitate the widening of
Rutherford Road from Weston Road to 240 metres west of Napa Valley Road (phase 1).
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004.
• Phase 1 -Cross Sections (Napa Valley Avenue to Weston Road) Sheet 21 -Sta. 16 +760
to 16 +780; Sheet 22 -Sta. 17 +080 to 17 +100; Sheet 23- Sta.17 +260 to 17 +380; dated
January 24, 2002; received April 11, 2002.
• Phase 1- Engineering Drawings (Napa Valley Avenue to Weston Road - Sta. 14 +110 to
Sta. 19 +600) Sheets 20; 23; 25; 34; 49- received April 5, 2002; Sheets 26; 27; 28-
received April 11, 2002; prepared by Winter Associates, a division of Trow
Consulting Engineers Ltd.
• Phase 1- Landscape Drawings -(Napa Valley Avenue to Weston Road) Sheet
91- Details; Sheet 35- Stations 16 +800 to 17 +150; received February 12. 2002;
prepared by Winter Associates, a division of Trow Consulting Engineering Ltd.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering and restoration plans to
Phase 1 and to Phase 2 drawings); dated April 30, 2002; received April 30, 2002;
submitted by Region of York.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The entire project involves the widening of Rutherford Road from Highway 27 to Weston Road.
The Region of York is seeking approval at this time for Phase 1 which includes Rutherford
Road widening from Weston Road to 240 metres west of Napa Valley. The works include the
alteration at 4 watercourse crossings through the deck expansion on the East Humber River
bridge, a culvert extension on one tributary and a storm sewer connection on the other two
tributaries. The entire project was subject to the Class Environmental Assessment process
which was completed in 1999.
Control of Flooding:
The works will maintain existing Regional Storm Floodplain conditions, therefore, the storage
and conveyance of flood waters will not be impacted.
Pollution:
Erosion control measures (silt fence, rock check dams and straw bales) will be implemented to
ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. In addition, all
works associated with watercourses will be isolated and constructed in the dry. The project
will include quality control measures for stormwater runoff through the use of existing SWM
ponds, construction of vegetated swales or installation of oil /grit separators.
Conservation of Land:
The phase 1 project involves deck expansion on the East Humber River bridge crossing on
previously constructed abutments. The works also include a culvert extension on one tributary
and storm sewer connection on the other two tributaries. The potential for a harmful alteration,
disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated through the use of erosion
216
control methods, completing the works within the warm water timing window (July 1 to March
31), completing the works in the dry and restoration of all disturbed areas with native non
invasive species. In addition, the works also encroach on the Pine Valley Forest and McLean's
Forest Environmental Significant Areas. The project includes a road design that minimizes the
removal of'woody vegetation and reduces long term impacts to the noted ESA's through edge
management plantings. All TRCA's lands required by the Region to complete the project have
been previously approved.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32946
Report Prepared by: Chris Hibberd, extension 5281
For information contact: Chris Hibberd, extension 5281
Date: April 19, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 058 /02/VAUG
8.1.24 DONNA MASSEL
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 24, Plan 4427, (11 Fredericton Road), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Donna Masse!.
The purpose Fs to excavate fill material as part of the installation of an in- ground swimming
pool, within the Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004.
• Site Plan prepared by the applicant; received April 26, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating fill material as part of the installation of an in- ground
swimming pool, Only the rear (i.e. southern) half of the backyard of the subject lands is located
within the Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River.
Control of Flooding:
No part of the property is located within the Regional Storm flood plain. Therefore, the control
of fiooding-will not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution: .
Sedimentation is not expected during construction, as the work site is-located-approximately
170 metres from the watercourse.
217
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is located on tableland; the proposed swimming pool will be situated 10
metres from the well- defined (and stable) top -of -bank of the Rouge River valley corridor
adjacent to the subject lands. In addition, all excavated fill material will be removed from the
site. Staff has reviewed the proposal and has confirmed that there are no slope
instability /geotechnical issues evident at this site. No significant resource features will be
impacted by the proposed works; all disturbed areas around the pool will be revegetated
following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33056
Report Prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: April 22, 2002
Application #: 123 /02 /MARK
8.1.25 REGION OF YORK TRANSPORTATION & WORKS DEPARTMENT
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 66, Concession 1, (Intersection of Yonge
Street and King Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Region of York.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the installation of a
200mm diameter watermain.
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004.
• Drawing 6 -dated December 2001; Drawing 7 -dated February 11, 2002; received
February 19, 2001; prepared by Region of York.
• Cross - Sections; Stations 23 +696.830 to 23 +760; received January 2, 2002; submitted
by Region of York.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering and restoration
plans); dated May 1, 2002; received May 1, 2002; prepared by the Region of York.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the installation of a 200 mm diameter watermain via directional drilling
along the west side of Yonge Street at King Side Road under the existing box culvert crossing
of the Humber River. Associated with the watermain installation is the resurfacing of asphalt
pavement, reconstruction of curbs, gutters, boulevards and centre median. The Yonge
Street/King Side Road intersection is located within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional
Storm Floodplain of the Humber River.
218
Control of Flooding:
The proposed grade within the Regional Floodplain will be modified slightly, however, there will
be no negative impacts to flooding associated with this minor increase in the profile.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the
construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The proposed watermain pipe
will be at least 1 metre below the existing culvert, therefore, there will be no implications to
down cutting into the pipe.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive seed mix following construction.
As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related
to fish habitat loss. The proposed works will affect no significant resource features.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing- of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32790
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: April 22, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO [MIDTOWN COMMUNITY AREA]
Application #: 019/02/RH
8.1.26 RICK RAND
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 9,
Concession 1 Plan 2773, (85 Plymbridge Road), in the City of Toronto (Midtown
Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Rick Rand.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in the floodplain associated with the Hogg's HoIlow
Special Policy Area, in order to facilitate the demolition of an existing dwelling, and the •
construction `of a new 973 square foot single family dwelling and swimming pool.
The permit willbe issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Bfi'seriient, Ground and Second Floor Plans; Front, South, East and West
Elevations,'Section 1 -1 (A8), Section 1 -1 (A9), Construction Notes, prepared by Clive
Grandfield of Designers Collaborative, dated March 8, 2002, recelved'Aprll 29, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking by owner and contractor Rick Rand, dated April 26, 2002, date
received April '29, 2002, by which the owner agrees to remove all excess fill material
from the site.
219
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to demolish an existing single family residence and construct a new residence
and inground pool with the Regional Storm floodplain and the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy
Area, involving the excavation and placement of fill within a regulated area.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River
(Hogg's Hollow Special Policy Area). The proposed new structure will be located outside of
the hydraulic floodway and above the 350 Year Flood elevation of the Don River. The
proposed works are not expected to impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
All excess fill will be removed from the site and erosion control methods (silt fence) will be
installed and maintained during the construction process to prevent sediment and debris from
reaching the river.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on land previously altered by development,
therefore no significant resource features will be affected. The proposed new dwelling is
consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. The proposed swimming pool is
located a minimum of 10 meters from the top of bank area. There are no slope
stability /fisheries /geotechnical issues associated with the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33055
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extenslon 5259
Date: April 3, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 122 /02/TOR
8.1.27 GEORGE BROWN /LYNN PINARD
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Plan 65M 2275, (70 Couperthwaite
Crescent - Unionville), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located
on the property owned by George Brown /Lynn Pinard.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill material for minor lot grading as part of the
construction of a two storey addition onto the rear of the existing dwelling, within the Fill
Regulated Area of the Burndenet Creek.
220
The permit will be issued for the period of May 3, 2002 to May 2, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan prepared by The Gregory Design Group; received April 24, 2002.
• Plans prepared by The Gregory Design Group, Project 651.01, Drawings A.1, A.2, A.3,
and A.4; received April 3, 2002.
• Silt Fence Installation Detail Drawing submitted by the applicant; received April 29,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and placing fill material as part of the construction of a two
storey addition onto the rear of the existing dwe_ling. The entire property is located within the
Fill Regulated Area of the Burndenet Creek and is part of the historical community of Unionville.
Control of Flooding:
The subject lands are located outside the Regional Storm flood plain. Therefore, the control of
flooding will not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be installed along the rear property boundary to impede the overland migration
of construction- generated sediments.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is situated on the relatively level area of the Burndenet Creek stream
corridor at this location; there are no slope instability / geotechnical issues evident at this site.
No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works; all graded and
disturbed areas will be revegetated following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(0) - Minor Additions - and Section 4.2.2(E) - Property
Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program.
CFN: 33070
Report Prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: April 24, 2002
221
Application #: 131 /02 /MARK
RES.#B43/02 - REGIONAL WATERSHED MONITORING PROGRAM
Benthic Invertebrate Identification Services. Award of contract for benthic
invertebrate sample identification in support of the TRCA's Regional
Watershed Monitoring Program.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Maria Augimeri
THAT the firm of Zaranko Environmental Assessment Services be retained to undertake
the identification of benthic invertebrate samples collected in 2002 in support of the
Regional Watershed Monitoring Program, the total cost not to exceed $34,848.00
(excluding GST).
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Monitoring is a critical step in the process of understanding the condition of the environment
around us, as well as the results of our actions. Monitoring provides essential information that
allows the establishment of quantitative targets for protection and rehabilitation, the evaluation
of management actions, and informed management decisions. In response to these needs,
the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has developed a Regional Watershed
Monitoring Program, this ongoing initiative has been developed to provide a comprehensive,
integrated and coordinated approach to environmental monitoring in the Greater Toronto Area.
In addition to surface water quality, fisheries information, geofluvial information and
flow /precipitation, benthic data is collected as part of the aquatic monitoring component of this
initiative. Using the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Stream Assessment protocol, benthic
invertebrates are collected at 150 watershed sites and 22 waterfront sites to assist in
determining water quality and habitat condition. The TRCA requires a consultant to identify and
tally benthic invertebrates collected during the field season of June to September 2002.
The successful candidate for this project is expected to provide: services for the identification
of benthic invertebrates to species; data reported in a spreadsheet format, providing individual
counts per site, and per species; a write up of methodologies used, including QA/QC protocol;
and a reference collection of 3 -5 individuals per species.
RATIONALE
At the present time, there are a limited number of individuals or consulting firms that provide
expert identification of benthic invertebrates to species level. In this respect, a request for
proposals was prepared and submitted to four consultants. These were: Mr. William B. Morton;
Zaranko Environmental Assessment Services; Mr. Henry Kowalyk (BII Consulting) and
Integrated Explorations Inc.
Proposals and quotations were received as follows:
222
Per sample Total cost
Zaranko Environmental Assessment Services - $121.00 $34, 848.00
(excluding GST)
integrated Explorations - $94.00 $27,072.00
(excluding GST)
Mr. Bill Morton - $142.50 $41,040.00
(excluding GST)
Mr. Henry Kowalyk - No proposal received
Staff have reviewed all three proposals and recommend that Zaranko Environmental
Assessment Services be retained to provide sample identification services in 2002. Although
Zaranko Environmental Assessment Services was not the least expensive, staff felt that based
on the proposals received, Zaranko Environmental Assessment Services demonstrated the
best sample identification methodology, QA/QC assurance and specimen sorting procedures.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this work has been identified within the 2002 Regional Watershed Monitoring
Program. Within this program a total of 150 watershed sites and approximately 22 waterfront
sites per year will have benthic invertebrates collected at each.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Upon awarding of the contract, 78 samples from the fall of 2001 will be forwarded to the
consultant for immediate identification, and staff will send monthly batches of samples
commencing in July 2002 for this year's field work.
Report prepared by: Trista Barber, extension 5333
For Information contact: Scott Jarvie, extension 5312
Date: April 23, 2002
RES.#B44/02 - RETAINING BIOLOGICAL/FISHERIES MANAGEMENT CONSULTING -
CONTRACT EXTENSION
Hire of biological/fisheries management consultant - extension of
contract
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Maria Augimeri
THAT Dr. Douglas Dodge be further retained by the Authority for the amount of $8, 294.00
plus taxes to provide expert opinion and scientific support to staff who are developing
the Duffins and Carruthers Creek Fish Management Plan.
CARRIED
223
BACKGROUND
Due to current and past staff turn -over, the Duffins and Carruthers Fish Management Plan
(Plan) needs prompt attention and expertise in order to meet the completion and approval date
of June 2002
Dr. Dodge, who is a member of the Duffins and Carruthers Watershed Strategy Task Force,
was approached by the TRCA to assist in developing a Plan that will meet the expectations of
the community, municipal, and government partners. Dr. Dodge was identified as the top -most
candidate capable of providing this service as a result of his intimate knowledge of the
watersheds (has been a resident in the watershed for 30 years), his involvement with the Task
Force (which will allow for easy integration with the Strategies), and most notably, his
internationally renowned knowledge and expertise in aquatic ecology and fisheries
management. Dr. Dodge's expertise and site specific knowledge cannot be matched by other
private sector consultants.
Dr. Dodge will act as advisor to the Plan development process. He will provide counsel,
scientific expertise, and review of material and draft of the Plan, while ensuring integration and
compatibility with the Duffins /Carruthers Strategy process.
This work will be undertaken over the next 9 weeks with a commitment from Dr. Dodge to work
1 day per week as per our meeting schedule.
RATIONALE
Dr. Doug Dodge is well known and respected by the scientific community for his expertise in
fisheries management. He has worked with the International Joint Commission providing
advice on the fisheries and ecology of the Great Lakes; he served 12 years as chair and vise
chair of the Habitat Advisory Board with the Great Lakes Fishery Commission; has written
chapters for two river management books, has edited publications from international
symposiums such as SOLEC (State of the Great Lakes Ecosystem Conference) and the Large
River Symposium, and was employed with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (from
which he has retired) for 19 years managing the Great Lakes and Large Lakes Management
Units. Overall, Doug has over 40 years of applicable experience to bring to the table.
Further to his qualifications, Dr. Dodge will provide an immeasurable service to the TRCA by
providing a cohesive bond between the public, angling groups, Town Council, MNR, and the
scientific community as a product of his many affiliations. This in turn will help tremendously in
gaining support and approval for the Plan.
By retaining Dr. Dodge, the Authority hopes to revolutionize the format and application of the
Plan which will set the stage for the Authority's other Fisheries Management Plans which are to
be updated over the next few years.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The necessary funding for this contract is available in Account #115 -18
Report prepared by: Lori Cook, extension 5371
For Information contact: Jon Clayton, extension 5353
Date: April 22, 2002
224
RES. #B45 /02 - EAST HUMBER RIVER HYDROLOGY UPDATE
To sole source the East Humber River hydrology update to the
consulting firm of Aquafor Beech Ltd.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Maria Augimeri
THAT the consulting firm of Aquafor Beech Ltd. be retained to undertake the East
Humber River Hydrology Update.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Based upon new information made available through the work completed for proposed
developments in the upper East Humber subwatershed in Richmond Hill (revised drainage
areas; additional stream flow data, etc.), the overall hydrology for this subwatershed requires
recalibration and updating.
These updated flows will then be used to update the existing hydraulic model for the East
Humber, from which updated Regional Storm floodlines will be plotted.
Rather than request proposals from a number of consultants, it is proposed to sole source this
work to Aquafor Beech Ltd. as their existing knowledge of the model would provide significant
efficiencies.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Authority staff have provided a detailed task list to Aquafor Beech Ltd. for which they have
provided a quote of $12,000 exclusive of GST. Staff are of the opinion that this amount
represents good value for the extent of work requested. Funding to complete this work is
available via funding received from the York Region Natural Heritage Management Program.
Report prepared by: Darlene Conway, extension 5278
For Information contact: Darlene Conway, extension 5278
Date: April 19, 2002
RES. #B46 /02 - BOYD NORTH GRAVEL PIT
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment. To complete a Phase II
Environmental Site Assessment of waste and impacted soil identified at
the Boyd North Gravel Pit Rehabilitation Project, and to implement a
remediation program, if needed, based on the consultants
recommendations.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Maria Augimeri
225
THAT staff be directed to report the findings and recommendations of a Phase II
Environmental Site Assessment awarded to Trow Consulting Engineers Ltd conducted on
a previously unidentified historic waste area identified within Boyd North Gravel Pit.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Boyd North Gravel Pit Rehabilitation Project (Site) is an environmental naturalization site
owned and operated by the Toronto & Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) in the City of
Vaughan. The Site is an abandoned gravel pit that operated some 40 -50 years ago, producing
aggregate material during the construction of Highway 400. The Site is located on the Boyd
North property - bounded by the TRCA's Conservation Service /Nursery Workshop to the west,
the Kortright Centre for Conservation to the east and Rutherford Road to the south.
While undertaking the rehabilitation work, TRCA staff uncovered a fill face and nearby slope
containing various types of waste of unknown origin or chemical composition. The waste is
likely associated with past aggregate extraction operations and included rubber tires and
belting, glass, rusted steel, construction debris, motor oil & transmission tins, and numerous 45
gallon steel drums. The waste is scattered over an area of approximately 2,000 m2, and is
within 75 m of the East Humber River. The Seed - Barker archaeological site is immediately
adjacent to the waste area.
TRCA staff immediately prepared and distributed Request for Proposal's (RFP's) to three
Environmental Consultants to conduct a limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
in order to characterize the waste, and to delineate the horizontal and vertical extent of possible
contamination. The RFP's were distributed to Conestoga Rovers Associates (CRA), Trow
Consulting Engineers Ltd and ESG International.
TRCA staff awarded Trow Consulting Engineers the contract with an upset limit of $9,400
(excluding GST), based on the proposal content and lowest overall cost. CRA's provided a
proposal with an upset limit of $10,610 (excluding GST). ESG International did not submit a
proposal.
RATIONALE
Given the unexpected discovery of the waste, the disruption to on -going rehabilitation works,
the TRCA's Archaeological Field School programming and the potential to create an adverse
effect on the nearby water course, staff acted immediately to arrange for the characterization
and delineation of the waste. The information provided by the consultant will allow the TRCA to
assess the extent of the problem and implement an appropriate clean -up.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds to implement the project are available in account 408 -77.
The cost incurred to date is $9,400 (excluding GST). Additional cost associated with a
clean -up will be provided based on the consultants findings.
Report prepared by: David Hatton, (416) 392 -9725
For Information contact: David Hatton, (416) 392 -9725
Date: April 19, 2002
226
RES. #847/02 - AWARDING OF CONTRACT - EXTERIOR VINYL SIDING
5 Shoreham Drive. Proposal for the supply and installation of new vinyl
siding for Head Office.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Maria Augimeri
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Herman's Aluminum be awarded the contract for the supply
and installation of the vinyl siding to 5 Shoreham Drive at a total cost of $29,746.00,
including G.S.T., subject to staff being satisfied that all conditions have been met.
CARRIED
RATIONALE
Proposals were invited from the following nine contractors:
Metro Roofing & Siding
George Kent Home Improvements Ltd.
Herman's Aluminum & Roofing
Willie Moller Industries Ltd.
B.W. Doucette Roofing & Restoration
The proposals received are as follows:
George Kent Home Improvements Ltd.
J. Talsma Aluminum Ltd.
Herman's Aluminum
B.W. Doucette Roofing & Restoration
The Proposals were evaluated based on the following criteria:
Better Aluminum
J. Talsma Aluminum Ltd.
Four Season McGraw
Renovation Ltd.
Ridgehill Home
Improvements
Total Cost
(Includes G.S.T. /P.S.T.)
$32,522.00
$35,192.30
$29,746.00
$42,969.06
• the written proposal;
• understanding of scope of work as outlined in the Terms of Reference and on site visit;
• time frame for delivery and installation.
Based on the staff review using the evaluation criteria, it is recommended that the proposal
received from Herman's Aluminum be accepted.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding is included in the 2002 approved Authority Capital Budget for the head office
renovation project.
227
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
To remove and dispose of the existing wood siding and to supply and install new Royal Cedar
Blend vinyl siding at our 5 Shoreham Drive location.
Report prepared by: Lori Colussi, extension 5303
For Information contact: James W. Dillane, extension 6292
Lori Colussi, extension 5303
Date: May 1, 2002
RES. #B48/02 - FLOODPLAIN MAPPING VECTORIZATION PROJECT FOR THE
ROUGE RIVER AND WEST HUMBER RIVER WATERSHEDS
Approval to retain QSP Geographics Ltd. to complete the digital
conversion of TRCA Rouge River and West Humber River 1:2000 scale
floodplain mapping in order to facilitate the update and management of
Flood and Fill Regulation Line Mapping.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Maria Augimeri
THAT the Authority enter into an agreement with QSP Geographics Ltd. to complete the
vectorization of remaining topographic and planimetric information for 67 1:2,000 scale
floodplain map sheets within the Rouge River and 11 1:2,000 scale floodplain map sheets
within the West Humber River Watersheds at a cost of $175 per map sheet with a
maximum upset limit not to exceed $14,000 excluding applicable taxes.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
One of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and
mapped information for use by the Authority and others, and to incorporate improved
technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order
to continue to provide accurate floodplain management information, the Water Management
Division has prepared a Floodplain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific
requirements necessary to update the Authority's current Flood and Fill Line Regulation
Mapping. Priority watersheds identified within the Work Plan include the Rouge and Humber
Rivers given the extent of previous, current and future development activities.
To -date, the 1:2,000 scale floodplain map sheets noted above have been scanned into digital
format as image files (i.e., *.TIF) and topographic information (i.e., contours and spot heights)
have been vectorized and tagged to include a 'z' coordinate. The work, previously approved
through the executive committee meeting #2/2001, was required facilitate the hydraulic model
conversion and update.
228
In order to finalize the conversion process, it is proposed to vectorize all remaining topographic
and planimetric features (eg., buildings, road edges, vegetation, text etc.) from the scanned
information to create a complete digital map product. This will permit TRCA staff to continue to
update base mapping information (both topographic and planimetric) as future changes occur
and to facilitate integration with new digital mapping.
A review of available technologies concluded that the most cost effective method available to
finalize the digital conversion process is through the vectorization of image data. The process,
offered through QSP Geographics Ltd., involves vectorizing all remaining features (i.e.,
buildings, road edges, vegetation, text etc.) into individual, unique lines through proprietary
software developed specifically for this application. in addition, QSP Geographics has
committed to deliver the final product within 5 weeks of project initiation at a cost which
represents a substantial savings when compared to the preparation of new digital base
mapping at approximately $5,000 per sheet.
In light of the above, it is recommended that this work be sole sourced to QSP Geographics
Ltd.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds required to complete the project are available within the approved 2002 Floodplain
Management budget 115 -85.
Report prepared by: Glenn Farmer, extension 5351
For Information contact: Glenn Farmer, extension 5351
Date: April 29, 2002
RES. #849/02 - BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE - COMMUNICATIONS
Award of Contract for Communications /Media Relations Services. Award
of contract to the Coaston Group to create and deliver BCPV
communications and media relations services for the 2002 season.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Maria Augimeri
THAT the Coaston Group be awarded the contract for communications and media
relations services at Black Creek Pioneer Village for the 2002 season ending December
31, 2002, at an upset cost of $26,400. (plus GST).
CARRIED
229
BACKGROUND
In 2001, BCPV conducted a call for proposals and selected Coaston Group to create and
deliver media relations services at a monthly cost of $3500 + GST. Coaston Group
successfully developed media contact lists, and delivered a program of press kits, press
releases, radio and television media coverage, media follow up, and tracking. Coaston Group
was successful in meeting BCPV's objectives of restoring and increasing BCPV's profile with
media in 2001.
There is a substantial learning curve in the delivery of an Attraction's media relations program.
Having successfully completed this information process, year 2 will require Tess focus on basic
protocols and more focus on creative effort to build attendance. In addition, Coaston Group
established a rapport on BCPV's behalf with the media. Engaging their services for this year
will be seamless to the media contacts.
Approval is requested to engage the Coaston Group for the 2002 season, at a cost of $3300 +
GST per month for a total of 8 months. Upset limit of this contract is $26,400 + GST.
Continuity with this service provider for the 2nd season enables BCPV to build media relations
component of the marketing plan efficiently. BCPV will conduct a complete proposal call for
this service for the 2003 season.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Funding for this contract is provided in the 2002 approved budget for Black Creek Pioneer
Village
Report prepared by: Jim Dillane, 416- 667 -6292
For Information contact: Jim Dillane, 416- 667 -6292
Marty Alexander, extension 5414
Date: May 01, 2002
RES. #B50/02 - KORTRIGHT BUILDING ASSESSMENT -
The Centre For Sustainable Living at Kortright. The TRCA has received
three proposals to complete a comprehensive building assessment of
the main visitors centre at Kortright. The assessment will satisfy the
requirements to build a "Case for Support" for the Centre for Sustainable
Living.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Maria Augimeri
THAT Enermodal Engineering Ltd. be hired to undertake the Kortright Building
Assessment;
AND FURTHER THAT weapprove the extra costs associated with the Ergonomic and
Functionality Assessment.
CARRIED
230
BACKGROUND
The Kortright Centre for Conservation is a not - for - profit environmental education facility, funded
through provincial and municipal partners, grants, self - generated revenues and private sector
donations. Owned and operated by the TRCA, the Kortright Centre is located on conservation
lands in the Humber River Watershed. Since 1979 it has delivered unique educational
experiences to more than one million public and school -age visitors.
Sustainable Living through Education is one of the three platforms of the Living City Vision
launched last October. A key project identified as part bf the Living City campaign is the
expansion of Kortright as an internationally acclaimed Centre For Sustainable Living to
demonstrate sustainable lifestyles'and practices and make these more accessible to the
public.
To further develop this vision the TRCA has embarked on the development of a Case for
Support that will identify key issues necessary to attract partnerships and to develop a detailed
plan for the Centre. The five main components are:
.1. A Needs Assessment - to identify the rationale and TRCA interest and strategic
benefits to developing such a centre
2. A Building Assessment to address the current condition of the on -site facilities ,
renovations and costs to make them functional part of the new centre
3. Sustainability Educational Program Approach - preliminary program scoping
and design
4. Preliminary conceptualization of the program /activities, exhibits, demonstrations,
site development and buildings and costs to develop and operate the Centre.
5. Business Plan including: market assessment, feasibility study, and
implementation plan to assess the viability of the project.
In August and September of 2001. the Executive approved the hiring of Kees Verburg to
conduct the preliminary concept business plan.
To date:
1. The needs assessment is complete
2. The Sustainability Education overview is underway
3. Preliminary concept and business plan is in progress
s
The selection of the consultant to conduct the building assessment completes the initiation for
the five components for the "Case For Support".
WORK PLAN /SCHEDULE:
The TRCA released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a comprehensive building assessment
for the Kortright Centre. The RFP was sent to eight companies with the prerequisites to
complete the work. Of the eight, three companies submitted proposals. EnerPlan, Allen and
Kani Associates, and Enermodal Engineering submitted proposals that satisfied all the criteria
in the RFP.
The work for the building assessment will take approximately 2 months from the date of
contractor notification.
231
RATIONALE
The TRCA staff has identified a need to revitalize the Kortright Centre for Conservation for its
long term viability. This new centre in conjunction with the new Earth Rangers Centre provides
solid ground for a positive vision and role for the Kortright Centre under the Living City
Campaign.
The current visitor centre at Kortright is experiencing structural, functional, and operational
difficulty's due to its age and use. The building assessment will detail and recommend serious
renovations /retrofits which are needed either as an interim upgrade plan until a new centre is
constructed, or as part of a longer term plan for the use of the main visitors centre as an
integral part of the new vision for the Centre For Sustainable Living.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The purpose of the assessment is to produce a report which will:
1. Assess the existing building condition and the performance of its HVAC system
2. Detail upgrades and retrofits to bring the building up to present code standards
3. Identify various levels of "Green Retrofits"
4. Utilize space in a manner that is ergonomically (relationship between people and their
working environment) comfortable, effective and efficient.
5. Assist the TRCA in determining the extent and cost of work associated with greening
the main visitor centre.
6. Provide a document which can be used by:
• the TRCA as strategic plan to green the Kortright Visitor Centre
• the TRCA for tendering purposes for the recommended work,
• future firms to help define what role this building could play as part of a new
vision for Kortright as a Centre for Sustainability.
7. Improve the quality of the indoor work environment for staff and visitors
8. Identify any incentive programs that the TRCA may access in order to assist in
implementing the recommendations
9. Identify the possibility whether the retrofit is extensive enough to meet the requirements
of the Commercial Building Incentive Program II (new terms).
10. Provide recommendations for a phased in green retrofit plan.
SCOPE OF WORK:
1. Structural Assessment
• Identify structural deficiencies from footings to roof;
• Prioritize the immediacy of the work;
• Recommend solutions and course of action; and
• Cost estimates for the recommendations, design, and construction
management costs.
2. Environmental Assessment
• Identify any building, mechanical, electrical components or
operations which pose an immediate negative impact on the local
environmental and /or the occupants.
• Identify any indoor air quality issues related to the building,
mechanical or electrical operations.
232
• Recommend solutions with associated cost estimates, and
environmental savings.
3. Energy Assessment
For the energy assessment this study should follow, as a minimum, the
feasibility guidelines identified by the City of Toronto - Better Building
Partnership.
• ' Identify, describe and assess existing building envelope (roof,
walls, windows, doors, ceilings, attics, basements, crawl spaces,
etc. in terms of their insulation, air tightness, and condition).
• Identify and describe existing HVAC and control equipment and
condition.
• Identify and describe other energy related equipment (lighting,
appliances etc.).
• Assess overall energy use and Toad breakdown.
• Using one or combination of the green building guidelines and
assessment tools quantify what type of energy reductions could
be reasonably achieved?
• Recommend solutions and best course of actions including the
use of renewable energy (day lighting, passive and active solar
heating, photovoltaics, etc.).
• Cost estimates, annual savings, simple payback, and
environmental savings estimates on recommendations.
• Assess the performance of the heating /cooling system of the
Green Works building and making recommendations and costs.
4. Incentive Programs
• Identify any incentive or subsidy programs that the TRCA may
access in order to assist in implementing the above
recommendations.
5. Ergonomic and Functionality Assessment
• A physical audit of components contributing to indoor
environmental quality will be conducted for the ergonomic and
functionality assessment.
When the assessment is completed, it will be used to prepare an interim work plan for needed
upgrades and also as part of the new centre vision in the case for support.
233
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This component of the Case for Support has been budgeted for in the 2002 budget year. The
budget for the building assessment is $20,000. The cost to prepare the building assessment
report from EnerModal Engineering is estimated at $19,950 , excluding GST. Enermodal has
proposed an extra assessment for a cost of $3,000 which is over above the budget, however,
the RFP did request other work that they recommend based on the problems outlined in the
RFP. Staff feel that the Ergonomic and Functionality Assessment does provide important
information which would help improve the working conditions for staff in the building as well as
provide relevant information for future renovations. There are funds in the 2002 budget to
accommodate the extra $3,000.00.
Report prepared by: Alex Waters, 5395
For Information contact: Alex Waters or Llsa King, 6290/5395/5386
Date: April 23, 2002
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:06 a.m., on May 3, 2002.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
234
c.
e'THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #5/02
June 7, 2002
The Executive Committee Meeting #5/02, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office, on
Friday, June 7, 2002. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:34 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Member
Lorna Bissell Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Ron Moeser Member
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
REGRETS
Irene Jones
RES. #B51 /02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THAT Minutes of Meeting #4/02, held on May 3, 2002, be approved.
DELEGATIONS
Member
CARRIED
(a) A delegation by Guido and Joanne Marinucci of 9 Weller Crescent, Maple, speaking in
regards to item 7.4 - Request for Disposal of Authority Owned Lands.
RES. #B52 /02 - DELEGATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Ron Moeser
THAT above -noted delegation (a) be heard and received.
CARRIED
235
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #B53/02 - THE CITY OF TORONTO VALLEY AND SHORELINE REGENERATION
PROJECT, 2002 - 2006
3015 and 3017 Queen Street East Erosion Control Project
NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 - 2006
Waterfront Component, Scarborough Sector, Burton - Lesbury Holdings
Limited Property, CFN 24450. Purchase of a partial taking municipally
known as 3015 and 3017 Queen Street East, located on the Lake Ontario
shoreline, located west of Fallingbrook Road adjacent to the R. C. Harris
Filtration Plant.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.748 hectares (1.85 acres) more or
less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of vacant land and bed of Lake Ontario,
being a partial taking from a larger holding, together with an easement and covenant
restricting the owner from placing structures or altering the grades over 0.029 hectares
(0.074 acres) be purchased from Burton - Lesbury Holdings Limited, said land being Parts
of Lots 11 and 12, Plan 1805, as amended by plan 1117, and part of the water lot in front
of the easterly half of Lot 35, in Concession A, City of Toronto (East Community), and
further described as Parts 2 and 3, on a draft reference plan;
THAT the transaction be completed on the following basis:
a) the purchase price be $2.00;
b) the Authority shall carry out and substantially complete the 3015 and 3017 Queen
Street East Erosion Control Works under the City of Toronto Valley and Shoreline
Regeneration Project;
c) Burton - Lesbury Holdings Limited, upon the Works being substantially complete shall
in accordance with the agreement on hand deliver to the City a release and formal
order dismissing Action No.01 -CV- 204858 commenced by the owner;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance,
subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
236
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2002, approved the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
Resolution #A29/02, Authority Meeting #1 /02, February 8, 2002, approved the City of Toronto
Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project.
The Burton - Lesbury Holdings Limited property is on the Authority's waterfront acquisition list.
Authority staff has had discussions over the years with the owners regarding acquiring their
shoreline and water lot. The subject property has also been identified under the City of
Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project as requiring erosion control and slope
stabilization works. After lengthy negotiations with the owners, the agreement on hand
provides for Burton - Lesbury Holdings to transfer the 1.84 acre shoreline and water lot portion
of their property to the Authority in exchange for the Authority carrying out erosion control and
slope stabilization works.
The negotiations were further complicated by the fact that the owner sued the City for damages
as a result of stormwater runoff during the May 2000 storms. The action claimed the
stormwater runoff aggravated the erosion and slope stability issues. The agreement on hand
also provides that Burton - Lesbury Holdings Limited will deliver to the City a release and formal
order dismissing the action. City officials have agreed with the terms and form of the release.
Negotiations have been conducted with Sid Troister, Torkin Manes Cohen Arbus LLP
representative of the owner.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The lands will be turned over to the City of Toronto under our management agreement. Lands
under this agreement are exempt from taxation.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The 3015 and 3017 Queen Street East Erosion Works will be carried out under the City of
Toronto Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project. Cost associated with the acquisition of the
property will be charged to account 004 -12.
Report prepared by: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Date: May 16, 2002
Attachments: 1
237
Attachment 1
gc11
co
:ni R
RE:
f i7
THE CITY OF TORONTO VALLEY AND SHORELINE REGENERATION
PROJECT, 2002 - 2000
3015 And 3017 Queen Street East Erosion Control Project
NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 - 2005, Waterfront Component, Scarborough Sector
Button-Lesbury Holdings Limited Property
CFN 24450
238
RES. #B54/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component/Don River Watershed
Maplewood Villages Ltd., CFN 33216. Purchase of property located
south of Kirby Road, east of Keele Street, City of Vaughan, Regional
Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and
Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005" Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Don River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 7.1 acres (2.8 hectares), more or
less, of vacant land, be purchased from Maplewood Villages Ltd., being Part of Lot 30,
Concession 3 and designated as Blocks 394, 395 & 396 on a draft Plan of Subdivision
prepared by Rady - Pentek & Edward Surveying Ltd. under their Job No. 99 -195, City of
Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York located south of Kirby Road, east of Keele Street;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance,
subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be pald;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approving the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's representative, Mr. D. Bettero of Evergreen
Development Consultants Limited.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition for the
Don River Watershed. The property is located in the McGiII Area Environmental', Significant
Area (ESA #73), has been designated by the Province as an Area of Natural anc Scientific
Interest (ANSI) and is on the Oak Ridges Moraine.
239
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
Based on the realty taxes paid on adjacent Authority lands it is estimated that the taxes will be
approximately $500.
The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact the Authority's
maintenance costs at this location.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502
Report prepared by: Michael Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Michael Fenning, extension 5223
Date: May 17, 2002
Attachments:1
240
Attachment 1
/ s
RE:
A i'0'..
t4
r
.s , pry
Y
:.••�tii I�a:l1'r"..
`,1 ��
NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation ComponenUDon River Watershed
Maplewood villages Ltd.
CFN 33216
241
Maa AOUROD Y P yfir LY
SUBJECT PROPERTY .4 ^\^r �
Tr'. it a.'--vstr
RES. #B55/02 - THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
Conveyance of Land for the Widening and Reconstruction of Islington
Avenue between Woodbridge Avenue and Rutherford Road
Humber River Watershed, CFN 32779. Receipt of a request from The
Regional Municipality of York for conveyance of land for the widening
and reconstruction of Islington Avenue between Woodbridge Avenue
and Rutherford Road in the Woodbridge area of the City of Vaughan.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from The Regional Municipality
of York to convey certain lands for the widening and reconstruction of Islington Avenue
between Woodbridge Avenue and Rutherford Road in the Woodbridge area of the City of
Vaughan;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the TRCA that it is in the best interest of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to cooperate with The Regional Municipality of York in this instance;
THAT three parcels of TRCA land containing 0.373 hectares, more or less, (0.922 acres)
be conveyed to The Regional Municipality of York for the widening and reconstruction of
Islington Avenue between Woodbridge Avenue and Rutherford Road, said land being
Part of Lots 8, 12, 13 and 14, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of
York, designated as Part 1 on Plan 65R- 24381, Part 1 on Plan 65R- 24382, Parts 1 and 2 on
Plan 65R -24527 together with a temporary easement over Parts 1 and 2 on Plan
65R- 24380;
THAT consideration Is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other
costs;
THAT archaeological investigation is to be conducted before any site disturbance with
any mitigative measures required being carried out all at the expense of The Regional
Municipality of York;
THAT The Regional Municipality of York is to fully indemnify and save harmless TRCA
from any and all claims for injuries, damages or loss of any nature resulting in any way
either directly or indirectly from this sale or the carrying out of construction;
THAT said conveyance is subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
242
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND •
The subject lands form part of a larger acreage acquired by TRCA from Dr. E. Boyd on June
20, 1956 under the Boyd Conservation Area Project. The Regional Municipality of York has
conveyed lands to TRCA over the years for nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested
that these lands be conveyed for the nominal consideration of $2.00
In addition to the fee simple conveyance, The Regional.Municiaality of York has requested to
utilize 0.014 hectares (0.035 acres) of TRCA lands in this area for temporary construction
purposes. A plan illustrating both the fee simple conveyance and temporary easement
locations is attached.
The widening of Islington Avenue will impact both our property line fencing and vegetation
along the Islington Avenue frontage of Boyd Conservation Area. As well as it will eliminate the
parking outside the Boyd gates during the off season. To address these impacts, the Region
has agreed to construct a new parking lot inside the Boyd Conservation Area gates, construct
a fence on the new property line and replace the vegetation.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Regional Municipality of York has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs
involved in completing this transaction.
Report prepared by: Michael Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Date: May 17, 2002
Attachments: 2
J
243
Attachment 2
RE:
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
Conveyance of Land for the Widening and Reconstruction of
Islington Avenue between Woodbridge Avenue and Rutherford Roac
Humber River Watershed
CFN 32779
SUBJECT PROPERTY
• •
ed. 7•••••-•
SUBJECT PROPERTY •
".•••••,,,,.. •
••••
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
244
Fjoitaitron
ICRSg 1RCA MOS
SUBJECT PROPERTY
r: MON TEMPORARY EASEMENT
Attachment 2
I9
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
Conveyance of Land for the Widening and Reconstruction of
Islington Avenue between Woodbridge Avenue and Rutherford Road
Humber River Watershed
CFN 32779
245
TRCA LANDS
SUBJECT PROPERTY
W.
C
'z
RES. #B56 /02 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS
Rear of 7 Bevan Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York
CFN 33029. Receipt of a request to consider disposing of a parcel of
TRCA land at the rear of 7 Bevan Road, located south of Major
Mackenzie Drive, west of Keele Street in the Maple area of the City of
Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Ron Moeser
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT item 7.4 - Request for Disposal of
Autholty Owned Lands, Rear of 7 Bevan Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of
York, be deferred.
CARRIED
RES. #B57 /02 - EXCHANGE OF LANDS
Vicinity of 18444 Centreville Creek Road
John C. Pennie, CFN 31789. Receipt of request from John C. Pennie to
exchange lands to resolve an encroachment, Town of Caledon, Regional
Municipality of Peel, on the Niagara Escarpment.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from John C. Pennie, the owner
of 18444 Centreville Creek Road, Town of Caledon to enter into an exchange of lands to
resolve an encroachment;
AND WHEREAS it Is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in
furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to
proceed with an exchange in this instance;
THAT TRCA enter into an exchange of lands on the following basis:
(a) John C. Pennie will convey to TRCA a parcel of land containing 0.94 acres, more or
less, being Part of the West Half of Lot 33, Concession 2, Town of Caledon, Regional
Municipality of Peel;
(b) TRCA will convey to John C. Pennie a parcel of land containing 0.94 acres, more or
less, being Part of the West Half of Lot 33, Concession 2, Town of Caledon, Regional
Municipality of Peel;
(c) John C. Pennie to pay all legal and survey costs and must obtain the approval of the
Land Division Committee for the Town of Caledon;
246
(d) Completion of this sale will be subject to any Planning Act approvals that may be
required for the severance. Any additional planning approvals which John C. Pennie
may desire, or the municipality requires, will be at the expense of John C. Pennie;
(e) John C. Pennie will construct a fence at his expense on the new property line;
(f) Title to the subject property will be in the same name as the adjacent property owned
by John C. Pennie so that the properties merge on closing;
THAT the sale be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act C.27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of any
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 2001, TRCA received a proposal from John Pennie the owner of lands at' 18444 Centreville
Creek Road and Ian McKinnon, TRCA's tenant at 18458 Centreville Creek Road, to purchase
approximately 20 acres together with the house, coach house, shed and barn. The Members
of TRCA at meeting #07/01 held on September 28, 2001 adopted Res. #A170/01 relating to
Mr. Pennie's request.
THAT the portion of Authority-owned land located at 18458 Centreville Creek, being Part
of Lot 33, Concession 2, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, requested for
purchase by Mr. J.C. Pennie, be retained for conservation purposes.
Since that time Mr. Pennie has decided to sell his property. As part of the sale, Mr. Pennie
undertook a survey to establish the limits of the property. This survey reveled that his coach
house, a portion of his asphalt pathway, two concrete pads and totem pole are located on
lands owned by TRCA. Mr. Pennie has approached staff to attempt to resolve this
encroachment issue. Staff feel that the best method to resolve this problem is with a land
exchange.
Both parcels of land are within the headwaters of the Humber River, on the Oak Ridges
Moraine and are in the Centreville Creek Environmental Significant Area (ESA #40).
Staff has also had preliminary discussions with staff of the Ministry of Natural Resources, who
administered the Niagara Escarpment Land Acquisition Program which provided funding to
TRCA to purchase th's property. MNR staff has indicated that a land exchange would be their
preferred option to resolve this encroachment.
The subject property is a small portion of a property acquired from James Wilfred Edwards on
September 22, 1989, under the Niagara Escarpment Land Acquisition Project.
A map illustrating the location of the subject property is appended.
247
FINANCIAL DETAILS
All costs associated with the transaction will be paid by Mr. Pennie.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: May 22, 2002
Attachments: 1
Attachment 1
•
s
.11
.u•
•
•
-•••■•-•-•./.
\\\
\
• _ • -
t
at a
3!
- • -
• •• •
- • Ili •
A
'ROAD 2"42Li
CIVON 1.110d111Y.
•
0
et; •
!riot .
RE:
EXCHANGE OF LANDS
Vicinity of 18444 Centreville Creek Road
John C. Pennie
CFN 31789
•
249
RES.#B58/02 - ENBRIDGE CONSUMERS GAS
Request for Permanent Easements for a gas main,
Waterfront, Etobicoke Sector, City of Toronto (East Community),
CFN 32286. Receipt of a request from Enbridge Consumers Gas for
permanent easements across TRCA lands on the south side of
Lakeshore Boulevard West, west of Park Lawn Road, in the City of
Toronto (West Community).
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from Enbridge Consumers Gas
to provide permanent easements across TRCA lands on the south side of Lakeshore
Boulevard West, west of Park Lawn Road, in the City of Toronto (West Community) to
facilitate the construction of a gas main;
AND WHEREAS it is the opinion of TRCA that It is in the best interest of TRCA in
furthering its objectives as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to
co- operate with Enbridge Consumers Gas In this instance;
THAT permanent easements be granted to Enbridge Consumers Gas across TRCA lands
containing 0.014 hectares, more or less (0.034 acres) being Part of Lot 7, Plan 83 -Y, and
Part of Water Lot Location CL 3021, City of Toronto (West Community), designated as
Parts 3 and 5 on a plan of survey prepared by Sexton McKay Limited under their Job No.
16218;
THAT the easements be granted across the subject land on the following terms and
conditions;
(a) The easement price Is to be the sum of $1,500;
(b) Enbridge Consumers Gas Is to pay all TRCA legal, appraisal, survey and other costs
Incurred to complete the transaction;
(c) Prior to commencing construction, a full archaeological review is to be carried out
to the satisfaction of TRCA's archaeological staff;
(d) Enbridge Consumers Gas is to fully indemnify and absolve TRCA, from any and all
claims of any nature resulting in any way from the granting of the easement or the
carrying out of construction;
(e) Any additional concerns as are deemed appropriate by TRCA's solicitors; ,
THAT the said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of The Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
250
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto including the obtaining of any
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Enbridge Consumers Gas is, proposing to relocate a gas main from the Lakeshore Boulevard
West bridge over the Mimico Creek onto TRCA and City of Toronto lands south of the bridge.
To facilitate this relocation Enbridge Consumers Gas is requesting easements from TRCA and
the City of Toronto on the south side of Lakeshore Boulevard West.
Prior to commencing construction, Enbridge will be required to assure TRCA that satisfactory
approvals have been obtained from the City of Toronto, Economic Development, Culture and
Tourism Department. The new gas main installation will be done by directional boring. It
appears that the bore pit on the west side of the Mimico Creek is located within the regulated
area, however, Development Services staff does not feel a permit is required from TRCA under
Ontario Regulation 158 for this work.
The subject lands were acquired from the Ministry of Natural Resources on February 16, 1979
and January 6, 1983 under the Waterfront component, Etobicoke Sector of the Land
Acquisition Project.
A plan illustrating this location is attached.
FINANCIAL
It is proposed that the funding obtained from this easement be utilized for the purchase of
other high priority Flood Plain, Valley, Lake Ontario Shoreline and Natural Heritage lands
properties under the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: May 02, 2002
Attachments: 1
251
Attachment 1
RE:
ENBRIDGE CONSUMERS GAS
Request for Permanent Easements for a gas main,
Waterfront, Etobicoke Sector, City of Toronto (East Community)
CFN 32286
10 1
"% 4 ,1 /4 tom; i "i �t i
4-',71‘1. �, y, ,.
` "�� ` i PROPOSED EASEM
252
onservafion
IORON1p AND ROOION
NNW
TRCALANDS c_
PROPOSED EASEMENT
/ !
WV( 76 3 ! L
RES. #B59/02 - HUMBER RIVER FLOODLINE MAPPING UPDATE
To retain consultants to update Humber River floodline mapping within
the City of Toronto, Peel Region, and York Region.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the following consulting firms be
retained for completing the following floodline mapping updates within the Humber River
watershed:
J.F. Sabourin and Associates Inc., Humber River within the City of Toronto;
Brian Greck and Associates, Humber River within Peel Region (excluding the West
Humber River);
Acres and Associated, East Humber River Environmental Ltd.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
One of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and
mapped information for use by the Authority and others, and to incorporate improved
technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order
to continue to provide accurate floodplain management information, the Water Management
Division has prepared a Floodplain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific
requirements necessary to update the Authority's current floodline mapping. One of the priority
watersheds identified within the Work Pian.is the Humber River given the extent of previous,
current and future development activities.
This project involves updating existing Humber River floodline mapping, originally prepared in
the late 1970s. The work has been broken into three separate projects: the Humber River within
the City of Toronto, the Humber River within Peel Region (excluding the West Humber River),
and the East Humber River in York Region.
For all three projects, the proposed works comprise converting the existing hydraulic model
from HEC -2 to HEC -RAS, which is an updated version of the hydraulic software package
currently used by T,RCA. The new software will improve modelling and data management
capabilities and permit TRCA staff to provide accurate, up -to -date floodplain information
required for regulation purposes. Within the City of Toronto, the update will make use of current
digital base mapping provided by the City which will allow incorporation of up- to-date
topographical information (as compared to the original 1970s base mapping). As current digital
base mapping is not available for the Peel and East Humber projects, the original 1970s base'
mapping will be used. However, all maps in these areas have been screened to ensure no
significant changes to the floodplain have occurred which would preclude their use, and the
maps have been converted to a digital format.
RATIONALE
Three consultant groups, as listed below, were invited to submit proposals for each project
based upon the Terms of Reference for the work. U3set limits for the projects were established
as follows: City of Toronto ($26,200); Peel Region (S25,200); and East Humber ($24,300).
253
1) City of Toronto
J.F. Sabourin and Associates Inc. $26,200
Winter Burnside $25,629
(Note: a third consultant, Giffels Associates Ltd. was invited to bid for this work but failed to
submit a proposal.)
2) Peel Region
Greck and Associates Ltd. $23,950
Totten Simms Hubicki $24, 887
Environmental Water Resources Group $24,800
3) East Humber
Totten Simms Hubicki Associates $23,543
Acres and Associated Environmental Ltd. $20,970
J.F. Sabourin and Associates Inc. $24,300
*AII prices exclude G.S.T.
A committee of three TRCA staff has unanimously selected the following consultants: City of
Toronto - J.F. Sabourin and Associates Inc., Peel Region - Brian Greck and Associates, and
East Humber - Acres and Associated Environmental Ltd. This selection was based upon the
consultants' submission of a fee proposal for consulting services which best satisfied the set of
written selection criteria as developed by TRCA in advance of the selection process. The
criteria included the requirement to have previous experience in the area of floodline mapping,
and familiarity with state -of- the -art approaches. The successful proposals offered the best
approaches to the work. Staff are confident that the chosen consultants will conduct the
required tasks in a timely and efficient manner.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available to complete this project through the approved budget under account code
115 -85.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The work involves the preparation of updated floodline mapping for the Humber River within
the municipalities of Caledon, Mono, Adjala - Tosorontio, Toronto Richmond Hill, King, and
Vaughan.
Report prepared by: Darlene Conway, extension 5278
For Information contact: Darlene Conway, extension 5278
Date: May 27, 2002
254
RES.#B60/02 - PROJECT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF NATURAL AREAS WITHIN
THE ROUGE RIVER WATERSHED
Tompion Limited, CFN 29782. Purchase of property owned by Tompion
Limited, located on the north west corner of Steeles Avenue East and the
Ninth Line, in the Town of Markham, Regional Municipality of York.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Maria Augimeri
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 16 hectares (40 acres) more or Tess,
consisting of a rectangular shaped parcel of land, be purchased from Tompion Limited,
said lands being Part of Lots 1 and 2, Concession 8, Town of Markham, Regional
Municipality of York, located on the north west corner of Steeles Avenue East and the
Ninth Line;
THAT the purchase price be $2,500,000;
THAT the Province of Ontario, The Regional Municipality of York and the Town of
Markham be requested to assist with the funding of this transaction;
THAT acquisition by TRCA Is conditional on the availability of all necessary funding;
THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Rouge Park Alliance at its meeting #4102 held on May 31, 2002, adopted the following
resolution:
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance request that the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority complete the purchase of the Tompion Limited property on the basis outlined
in the accompanying report, subject to the availability of suitable funding.
AND FURTHER THAT the Province of Ontario, The Regional Municipality of York and the
Town of Markham be requested to assist with the funding of this transaction.
Resolution #A52/99, TRCA Meeting #2/99, February 26,1999, approved the "Project for the
Acquisition of Natural Areas within the Rouge River Watershed."
255
The subject lands are located on the north west corner of Steeles Avenue and Ninth Line in the
Town of Markham and consist of triangular shaped parcel. The total area of the site is 40
acres. The property is bisected by the main Rouge River Valley.
Negotiations have been conducted with Larry Gluckstein of Coldwell Banker Pinnacle Real
Estate and an Agreement of Purchase and Sale has been secured which is conditional on
approval of the Members of TRCA and obtaining the necessary funding.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property is strategically located on the Main Rouge River linking the Rouge Park
North and South and is high on the Pool of Priority Acquisition Sites for the Rouge Park
approved by the Rouge Park Alliance.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The subject property is currently rented for farming purposes. As a result of this use the
property is eligible under the Farmland Property Class Taxation Program. Therefore the realty
taxes on the property will be approximately $650 for 2002.
It is proposed that TRCA continue to rent this property for farming purposes to continue to
receive the benefit of the farmland tax rate. The farmer will also be responsible for the property
maintenance.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
It is proposed that the Province of Ontario, the Regional Municipality of York and the Town of
Markham be requested to fund this transaction. A preliminary request has been made to the
Province under their Ecological Land Acquisitions Program for funding and we are encouraged
by the initial response. The Rouge Park has sent out requests for funding to the Regional
Municipality of York and the Town of Markham. These requests have been sent out now so
that they are dealt with by both Regional and Markham Councils prior to their summer break.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: May 27, 2002
Attachments: 1
256
Wonservafibn
‘13=• Wisner mammy
257
RES. #B61/02 - THE RETENTION OF SURPLUS CITY OF TORONTO
ENVIRONMENTAL LANDS
Generation Boulevard at the Rouge Park Swamp. TRCA staff support of
the Rouge Park Alliance and their promotion to retain Environmentally
Significant lands being considered to be surplus by the City of Toronto.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the .355 hectares of tableland
woodlot associated with the Rouge Swamp fronting onto Generation Boulevard being
shown on the City of Toronto surplus land inventory, be removed from the inventory of
the Corporate Services Department and be transferred to the Parks and Recreation
Department for conservation purposes; _
THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority support the Rouge Park Alliance
promotion of the above recommendation and advise the City of Toronto of that support;
AND FURTHER THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority staff work with the City
of Toronto Parks and Recreation Department and the Rouge Park Alliance to develop a
concept plan that utilizes the educational and outdoor opportunities of the wetland while
allowing for it's protection and restoration.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Rouge Park Alliance at its meeting of Friday May 31st, 2002 approved the following
recommendations as they relate to a portion of lands associated with the Rouge Park Swamp
shown on the surplus inventory of City of Toronto:
THAT the Rouge Park Alliance request that the City of Toronto remove the city -owned
lands which include Rouge Park Swamp ESA #138 from its surplus land inventory, that
none of these lands be sold for development, and that they be transferred from the
Corporate Services Department, Facilities and Real Estate, to the Parks and Recreation
Department;
AND THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) support the above
recommendation and inform the City of Toronto of that support;
AND THAT the Rouge Park Alliance, Toronto Parks and Recreation Department, and the
TRCA work jointly to develop a conceptual plan which would identify outdoor education
opportunities, wetland and other ecological interpretation potentials, opportunities for
restoration and protection of natural habitat features, and ways to integrate the
interpretation and presentation of these values with the surrounding community;
AND FURTHER THAT the Rouge Park Alliance and its partners investigate public use
aspects of the proposed park area, particularly the development of a natural trail
connection with the nearby Glen Eagles site of the main Rouge Park to enhance the
value of both sites.
258
The .355 hectare parcel is adjacent to Generation Boulevard and was envisioned through an
earlier planning process to be developed. At the time TRCA staff did not have an objection to
the inclusion of the lands within the development fabric and to the extent possible promoted
the protection of the woodlot. The lands are not within a Fill Regulated Area and are entirely on
tableland. In 1996 after extensive inventory of tableland woodlots within the City of Toronto, the
lands including the adjacent Rouge Swamp lands were recognized as being Environmentally
Significant. The Rouge Park Swamp is recognized as a high quality wetland due to the
maturity, age diversity and undisturbed character of the forest. This .355 hectare parcel is
connected to the Rouge Park Swamp via an existing manicured sewer easement. Given the
connection of the lands to the adjacent ESA staff are supportive of the preservation of these
lands as part of the City of Toronto open space system The lands will have a function in
increasing the size of the Rouge Park Swamp habitat block to be protected.
For these reasons the lands should not be considered surplus and should be protected.
Report prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: June 04, 2002
Attachments: 1
259
Attachment 1
t,nv1 rui mteih L.cz i t ji ' J 1 i j "1 { t cell ! 1. I►irea
)jtomstra region
conssrosgon
.O.._r.,
it 100
City of Scarborough
E.S.A. #138 Rouge.Park Swamp
scale
4 00 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 Metres
260
1996
RES. #B62/02 - USE OF "GREEN" ELECTRICITY AT TRCA FACILITIES
Report recommends as a general policy the commitment of TRCA to the
use of "green" electricity at various TRCA facilities.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT as a general
policy, the Authority commit itself to increasing use of "green" electricity at all of its
facilities;
THAT the Authority set as a first year target the commitment to purchase at least 10% of
its total electricity needs as "green" electricity;
THAT the Authority work with the City of Toronto and Toronto Hydro to make use of
"green" electricity at the TRCA head office, Black Creek Pioneer Village and its other
facilities within the City of Toronto;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to review and report on the potential benefits of a
"green" electricity program for TRCA facilities including a long term, percentage of total
use green electricity target, benefits and costs of green electricity use and recommended
suppliers of green electricity to TRCA facilities outside of the City of Toronto.
CARRIED
RATIONALE
As Members are aware, the deregulation of the electricity market has created a variety of
options for purchase of electricity. Staff has been investigating how the Authority will respond
to the new market conditions. This analysis involves collecting all of electrical use information
from all of our facilities and evaluating such things as the proportionate costs of generation and
transmission /distribution. Deciding on the most appropriate vehicle from which to make
electricity purchases will follow.
The potential now exists to purchase "green" electricity. This is power produced by wind
energy, low impact hydro, biomass and solar energy. These sources are certified under the
Federal Government's Environmental Choice program or Ecologo program. Several suppliers
are committed to producing this green electricity, the production of which is carefully
monitored to ensure that in total no one is actually selling more green electricity than capacity
to produce.
The cost of the green electricity is higher than electricity from traditional sources. As demand
increases, it is assumed that more facilities will come on stream and costs will diminish. In the
meantime, TRCA will have to pay a premium for its green electricity.
In pursuit of the TRCA's Living City Region vision, it is important that the Authority demonstrate
its commitment to sustainable living in its use of energy. The use of green electricity
represents one way to show this leadership. The proposed target is to purchase at least 10%
of the TRCA's electricity over an initial 12'month period as "green" electricity.
261
While other sources of electricity are being considered for TRCA needs outside of the City of
Toronto, it is recommended that TRCA purchase from Toronto Hydro the electricity it needs for
facilities in the City. Toronto Hydro is owned by the City which is the Authority's largest
municipal funding partner. Toronto Hydro is a promoter of green power and with "Friends of
the Earth" is seeking corporate commitment to green electricity in the new market place.
Staff will prepare a detailed analysis of electrical energy use and report to the Authority on the
most appropriate, long term purchase arrangement.
Report prepared by: Jim Dillane, extension 6292
For Information contact: Jim Dillane, extension 6292
Date: June 04, 2002
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES.#B63/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Michael Di Biase
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.1 - 8.1.27, inclusive), which are listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF TORONTO (EAST YORK COMMUNITY)
8.1.1 APHRODITE TSANGARIS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Plan 3539, (101 Parkview Hill
Crescent), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Aphrodite Tsangaris.
262
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Don River to facilitate the
demolition of the existing house and the construction of a new two- storey residence and a
retaining wall, and the installation of an in- ground swimming pool.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Drawing No. Al, dated May 24, 2002, date received May 28, 2002, Proposed
Ground & Basement Plan, Drawing No. A2, Proposed Second & Roof Plan, Drawing
No. A3, Elevations, Drawing No. A4, and Sections, Drawing No. A5, dated May 7, 2002,
date received May 14, 2002, all prepared by David Fujiwara Architect.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the demolition of the existing house which is located just outside of the
fill regulated area, and the construction of a new residence, having a slightly larger building
footprint and which extends into the fill regulated area. In addition, the proposed works include
the construction of a 1 metre high pre -cast retaining wall along a garden slope directly behind
the house and the installation of an in- ground swimming pool in the rear yard. All works will be
located on the tableland.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is located entirely outside of the Regional Storm flood plain, therefore the
control of flooding will not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected during construction as the work site is located approximately
175 metres from the watercourse and all excess fill will be removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
The Don Valley Parkway traverses the Don River valley in this area, with the Don River being
situated on the west side of the DVP and the subject property being located on the east side of
the DVP. As such, only a portion of the subject property is located within the fill regulated area.
The proposed new development is located entirely on tableland and will maintain a minimum
setback of 24 metres from the top of bank. The proposed works are consistent with existing
development in the corridor reach and will not impact on any significant resource features.
There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33261
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 28, 2002
263
- of the Authority's Valley
Application #: 215/02/TOR
8.1.2 CHRISTINE AND DREW MCDONALD
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 38, Plan 3618, (224 Parkview Hill
Crescent), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Christine and Drew McDonald.
The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area, in order to construct an 8 square metre
cabana (pool house) at the rear of an existing house and swimming pool.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• A -1, Site Plan, prepared by Adapt -able Design, date stamped May 17, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To place fill in a Regulated Area in order to construct a cabana (pool house) on an existing
residential lot, in an established neighbourhood in the former Borough of East York. The
cabana will be approximately 8 square metres in size, and will be constructed on a concrete
slab in the rear yard, behind the existing house and existing swimming pool.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works will not be located in the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore will
not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sedimentation of the adjacent watercourse will be prevented with sediment fencing to be
established for the duration of construction.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed structure will be located more than 6 metres from the adjacent stable top of
bank, and will be consistent with development in the same corridor reach. There are no
geotechnical issues related to the proposal, and no significant natural resource features will be
affected by the proposal. After construction is complete, any disturbed area will be restored to
original condition, with sod.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E), Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33242
Report Prepared by: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: May 24, 2002
264
Application #: 203/02/TOR
8.1.3 JIM MOUTSANAS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, Plan 3728, (103 Northdale Boulevard),
in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as.
located on the property owned by Jim Moutsanas.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a new 322 square foot addition to the west side of an existing
dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Foundation and First Floor Plans, Rear, Front and Left Elevations,
Cross - Sectional and Construction Notes, Letter of Intent, prepared by the applicant,
received May 13, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal: •
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated area of the Don River
Watershed, in order to facilitate the construction of a new 322 square foot addition to an
existing dwelling. The proposed addition does not extend past the rear wall of the existing
dwelling, and maintains a distance of 22 meters from the top of bank area.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Don River, therefore the conveyance and storage of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located on flat tableland, a distance of 22 meters from the top of bank
area. No Sedimentation of the watercourse is expected as a result of the proposed works.
Conservation of Land:
The majority of these works will be undertaken at the side of the existing dwelling, and are
consistent with the existing development along the corridor reach. The addition will not extend
past the rear of the existing structure. The proposed works are not located near any significant
resource features, and there are no slope stability /geo- technical issues associated with this
project.
265
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.2. (C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33221
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 16, 2002
Application #: 191/02/TOR
8.1.4 R. PULLA
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 43, Plan 3728, (10 Glenshaw Crescent), in
the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by R. Pulla.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area to facilitate the installation of an
in- ground swimming pool in the backyard.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan submitted by Rand Pools, date received May 7, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the excavation and replacement of fill material to facilitate the installation
of an in- ground swimming pool in the backyard of the subject property.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm flood plain, therefore, there will
be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from the proposed works as all work will be confined to
tableland, located approximately 100 metres from the watercourse, and all excess fill will be
removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on flat tableland, approximately 13 metres from the top of
bank. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works which are
consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the proposal.
266
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33189
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 8, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
Application #: 179/02/TOR
8.1.5 DAVID BLACKBURN
To place fill within a regulated area on (42 Delroy Drive), in the City of Toronto
(Etobicoke Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the
property owned by David Blackburn.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek, in
order to facilitate the construction of a 195 square foot deck at the rear of an existing dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Deck Details, Gate Detail, prepared by the applicant, dated April 17, 2002,
received April 30, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated area of the Mimico Creek, in
order to facilitate the construction of a new 9 meter by 2 meter deck along the rear of an
existing dwelling, 10 meters from the top of bank.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain, and as such, the
storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The only excavation for this project will be for three concrete piers which will support the deck.
There will be minimal excavation for this project. The subject works are to be undertaken on
fiattableland, more than 32 meters from the watercourse. Sedimentation as a result of
construction is not expected.
267
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are consistent with existing development along the corridor reach. There
are no significant resource features on the subject property. Staff have determined that there
are no geo- technical /slope stability issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33161
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 1, 2002
Application #: 163/02/TOR
8.1.6 HYDRO ONE NETWORKS INC.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 30, Concession B; Lot 1, Plan
M -4691, (24 Irwin Road and 34 Irwin Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke
Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Hydro One Networks Inc..
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Fill Regulated area and Regional Storm
Floodplain of the Humber River, in order to demolish two single family dwellings and their
associated structures, for the purpose of expanding existing parkland.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plans, Construction Details, prepared by the applicant, received May 27, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in
order to facilitate the demolition of two existing homes and their associated structures, for the
purpose of expanding existing parkland. All structures on the property are to be demolished to
grade. The remainder of the basement/concrete removal is to be backfilled with clean and
compacted material, graded and top dressed with topsoil and re- vegetated.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed removal of existing structures will increase the storage capacity of the floodplain
and improve the conveyance of floodwaters.
268
Pollution:
All demolished material will be removed from the site. The proposed works will take place
approximately 160 meters (524 feet) from the watercourse, and will be re=vegetated upon
completion. Sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur as a result of this project.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located within the floodplain area. There are no significant resource
features on site. Existing grades will be maintained. There are no geotechnical /slope stability
issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (F) - Opportunities for Regeneration - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33252
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 27, 2002
Application #: 210/02/TOR
8.1.7 ISLINGTON GOLF CLUB LIMITED
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 3, Concession A, (45 Riverbank Drive), in the
City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as
located on the property owned by Islington Golf Club Limited.
The purpose is to remove an existing pedestrian bridge and install a new prefabricated
pedestrian bridge on new concrete abutments, across Mimico Creek, slightly upstream of the
existing bridge, in order to facilitate the continued use of an existing golf course.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Drawing Fig. No 1, Red -lined Revised Plan View illustrating Sediment
Control and East Elevation, prepared by Rutherford Contracting Ltd., date received
May 16, 2002.
• Plan showing Location and Cross - Section of Existing Storm and Sanitary Sewers on
Islington Golf Course, submitted by Rutherford Contracting Ltd., date received May
16, 2002.
• Prefabricated Bridge Design Drawings, Drawing Nos. 1 of 2, and 2 of 2, prepared by
Eagle Bridge, date received January 18, 2002, revised May 16, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
269
Proposal:
The proposal involves the removal of an existing unsafe wooden pedestrian and golf cart
bridge over Mimico Creek and the installation of a new prefabricated steel bridge with wooden
decking. A large crane, located above the top of bank, will be used to remove the old bridge
and install the new bridge on new concrete abutments. A backhoe will be used to excavate for
the new abutments, which will be situated approximately 4 metres back from the top of bank.
The old abutments will remain in place, which will help stabilize the embankments and reduce
disturbance of the site adjacent to the watercourse. At the request of the City of Toronto, the
new bridge will be relocated slightly upstream of the existing bridge in order to move it off the
municipal storm and sanitary sewer easement. The new location is devoid of woody vegetative
cover.
Control of Flooding:
The new bridge abutments will be situated approximately 4 metres back from the top of bank,
with the new bridge spanning Mimico Creek. The old abutments will be left in place, with the
exception of removing that portion above grade. No instream works will occur and the existing
hydraulic cross - section of the channel will remain the same. Thus, the proposed works will not
impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwater.
Pollution:
The bridge replacement does not involve any instream works and the work area will be
protected by siltation fencing.
Conservation of Land:
There are no fisheries issues associated with the project and the proposed works will not
impact on any significant resource features. The removal of the old bridge deck and
installation of the new prefabricated bridge will be done by crane which will access the site by
an existing driveway located above the top of bank. The existing cart path requires only minor
improvement (i.e. some placement of granular material for bridge approaches) to provide
access to the new bridge site. Upon completion of the bridge, the site will be restored.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32841
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: January 22, 2002
Application #: 030 /02/TOR
8.1.8 TERESA SZEFLINSKA -WOZNY
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Plan M -906, (257 Martin Grove Road),
in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Mimico Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by Teresa Szeflinska - Wozny.
270
The purpose is to excavate in a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Mimico Creek, in order
to facilitate the construction of a 245 square foot kitchen and deck addition to the rear of an
existing dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Cross - Section, South and Front Elevations, Lower Level, Ground, and Second Floor
Plans, prepared by Domex Design and Construction, date received April 23, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
Theproposal is to excavate in a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a
245 square foot kitchen and deck addition which will be set on piers at the rear of an existing
dwelling.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Mimico Creek, therefore the control of flooding should not be affected.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be installed between the proposed works and the top of bank area, in
order to prevent sediment from reaching the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will take place a minimum of 8 meters from the top of bank area. There
are no significant resource features on site, and staff have determined that there are no slope
stability /geo- technical issues associated with the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (C) - Minor Additions of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33164
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 1, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO ( HUMBER YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 165/02/TOR
8.1.9 BETUL AND ROBERT TODD
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 15, Plan M826, (47 Moon Valley Drive), in
the City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council Area), Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Betul and Robert Todd.
271
The purpose is to excavate within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in order to
facilitate the construction of a new 55 square meter (180 square foot) sunroom and 37 square
meter (120 square foot) deck to the rear of an existing dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Roof, Basement and First Floor Plan, Deck Plan, Front, Left and Right
Elevations, letter of Intent, prepared by Lifestyle Sunrooms, dated March 27, 2002,
received April 30, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate within a Fill Regulated Area, in order to facilitate the construction of
a new 55 square meter (180 square foot) sunroom and 37 square meter (120 square foot) deck
on piers to the rear of an existing dwelling.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Humber River. Therefore there will be no impact to the storage and conveyance flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located 28 meters (92 feet) from the Humber River. Excavation will be
undertaken for the piers only. Sedimentation as a result of construction is not expected.
Conservation of Land:
The project will not impact any significant resource features, and staff have determined that
there are no slope stability /geo-technical issues associated with this project. The proposed
works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal complies with Section 4.2.2. (C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33200
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 13, 2002
Application #: 186/02/TOR
8.1.10 JAMES MANN
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 4, Plan 1940, (34A Stonegate Road), in
the City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council Area), Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by James Mann.
272
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in
order to facilitate the construction of a new sincle family dwelling on an existing lot of record,
within a regulated area of the Lower Humber R ver.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -Ilned Revised Site Plans Al - A11, and B1 - B6, prepared by Envision Design,
received March 27, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in
order-to facilitate the construction of a new single family dwelling, approximately 10 meters,
from the stable top of bank. The works are in accordance with site plan number TA SPC 2002
0015, accepted by the City of Toronto.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm floodplain associated with the
Humber River, therefore the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works will occur approximately 38 meters (124 feet), from the watercourse.
Erosion control measures (sediment fencing) will be installed and maintained during the
construction process. All excavated fill material will be removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on flat tableland approximately 10 meters from the top of
bank area. There will be minimal changes to grade as a result of new construction. This
proposal is consistent with existing uses along the corridor reach. There are no slope
stability /geo- technical issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (G) - Infllling - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33064
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: April 3, 2002
273
Application #: 129/02/TOR
8.1.11 SUSAN WATT & KENNETH MANGET
To place fill within a regulated area on (11 Kingsway Crescent), in the City of
Toronto (Humber York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Susan Watt & Kenneth Manget.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in order
to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool and cabana at the rear of an
existing dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -lined Revised Site Plan, Landscaping Plan, Letter of Intent to remove Excavated
Material, prepared by Mark Hartley Landscape Architects, dated April 24, 2002,
received May 1, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated area of the Humber River, in order
to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool and cabana at a distance of 8
meters from the top of bank area, at the rear of an existing dwelling. This proposal has been
supported by a geo- technical report provided by the applicant.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Humber River, therefore the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be installed and maintained throughout the construction process. The
proposed works are located on fiat tableland, a distance of 85 meters from the watercourse.
Landscaping plans have been submitted in conjunction with this application, in order to further
stabilize the valley slopes. Sedimentation of the watercourse as a result of construction is not
expected.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is located on flat tableland and there are no significant resource features
on the site. The proposed pool and cabana will be located a minimum of 8 meters from the top
of bank area and a geo - technical report has confirmed that there will be no slope
stability /geo-technical issues associated with this project. This proposal is consistent with
existing uses along the corridor reach.
Policy Guidelines:
This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
274
CFN: 33097
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: April 17, 2002
Application #: 149/02/TOR
8.1.12 THE BLACK CREEK CONSERVATION PROJECT OF TORONTO
To construct in a flood plain on (Alliance Avenue, south side: length of channel), in
the City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council Area), Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by The Black Creek Conservation
Project of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated area of the Humber River
Watershed (Alliance Avenue SPA), in order to facilitate the construction of a new 550 meter
wood -chip pedestrian trail.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Location, Trail Profile, Project Details, prepared by the applicant, dated April 19,
2002, received May 1, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within the Fill Regulated area of the Humber River
(Alliance Avenue SPA), in order to facilitate the construction of a new wood chip pedestrian trail
along the north side of the Black Creek channel on Alliance Avenue. The works will include the
removal of the existing sod, and placement of wood chips. The works will be undertaken by
the City of Toronto Parks and Recreation Department with the assistance of the Black Creek
Project.
Control of Flooding:
The storage capacity and conveyance of flood waters will not be affected by the proposed
works.
Pollution:
There will be minimal disturbance and removal of soil in this proposed project. Sedimentation
as a result of construction is not expected to occur.
Conservation of Land:
This stretch of the Black Creek is highly altered, consisting mainly of fill material. There are no
significant landforms associated with this site, and no slope stability /geo- technical issues
associated with the proposed works.
275
.Policy Guidelines:
This project is consistent with Section 4.1.2. - New Resource -Based Uses - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33163
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 1, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (MIDTOWN COMMUNITY)
Application #: 164/02/TOR
8.1.13 BARRY & MARY JEAN LITWIN
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 13, Plan 3681, (71 Bayview Ridge
Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Barry & Mary Jean Litwin.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated area of the Don River watershed in
order to facilitate minor landscaping and slope naturalization.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Cross - Sectional Drawings, prepared by Oriole Landscaping, dated April
2002, received May 3, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated area of the Don River
Watershed, in order to facilitate minor landscaping and slope naturalization. The current
conditions include a highly manicured backyard tableland, extending to a steep embankment
supported with failing timber retaining walls. The proposal involves the removal of the existing
timber walls and associated overburden, and re- grading and landscaping of the rear yard to
create a more natural slope line with plantings.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm floodplain associated with the
Don River, therefore the conveyance and storage of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located more than 280 meters (918 feet) from the Don River. The
slope area between the subject property and the river are well- vegetated. The proposed works
will involve the use of sediment fencing, therefore sedimentation of the watercourse is not
expected.
276
Conservation of Land:
The existing landscape has been altered as a result of filling and grading which occurred
during the construction of the existing house. The proposed works will re- vegetate the rear
yard, and soften the rear slopes by removing the timber retaining walls and the overburden of
the slope.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33094
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: April 17, 2002
Application #: 147/02/TOR
8.1.14 BELL CANADA
To place fill within a regulated area on (Eglinton Avenue East), in the City of Toronto
(Midtown Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the
property owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a reculated area to facilitate the installation of a
Bell Canada conduit under the West Don River by d rectional boring. Bell is upgrading their
infrastructure and require additional telecommunication lines. The new conduit will be placed
alongside the existing Bell line.
The permit will be issued for the period of to in accordance with the following documents and
plans which form part of this permit:
• Key Plan, and Red -line Revised Plan Nos. 402 and 403, prepared by Morrison
Hershfield, dated March 20, 2002, date received March 27, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a regulated area to facilitate the installation of a
Bell Canada conduit under the West Don River by directional boring. Bell is upgrading their
infrasture and require additional telecommunication lines. The new conduit will be placed
alongside the existing Bell conduit.
Control of Flooding:
No excavated material will be stockpiled within the Regional Storm Floodplain and all existing
grades will be maintained. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected by the
proposed works.
277
Pollution:
Silt fencing will encircle the bore pits to impede the overland migration of construction
generated sediments.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no instream works and no riparian vegetation will be impacted by the proposed
works. The conduit will be installed through the use of directional boring a minimum of 1.5
metres beneath the watercourse. The bore pits will be located entirely on the tableland and
there are no slope stability /geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with the proposed
works. All disturbed areas will be revegetated /stabilized following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33069
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: April 5, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 134/02/TOR
8.1.15 BILL BREULS
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, Plan 2134, (10
Farmingdale Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area),
Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bill Breuls.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a new in- ground swimming pool and associated landscaping.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
i
• Red -lined Revised Site Plan, Letter of Intent to Remove Excavated Materials, prepared
by Nell Pike Limited, date received May 2, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within the Fill Regulated area of the Don River, in
order to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool and associated landscaping.
The works are located within the manicured section of the rear yard of the subject property.
278
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located more than 40 meters (131 feet) outside of the Regional Storm
Floodplain associated with the Don River. All excavated excess fill material will be removed
from the site. This project is not expected to affect the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pol ution:
The proposed works are located approximately 50 meters (164 feet) from the watercourse. A
well treed, undulating slope lies between the works and the watercourse. Sediment fencing
will be installed and maintained during the construction process, until vegetation has
regenerated. No sedimentation is expected to reach the watercourse as a result of
construction.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are occurring on an area which has been filled and shaped during the
construction of the house (and are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach).
No natural landforms will be affected or changed during the proposed works. There are no
slope stability /geo- technical issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and
Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33077
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: April 9, 2002
Application #: 139/02/TOR
8.1.16 HERBERT VIESMAN
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, Plan M -754, (67 Forest Grove Drive),
in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Herbert Viesman.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a fill regulated area of the Don River to facilitate the
demolition of a hot tub enclosure at the rear of the residence in order to construct a new
screened porch, and the construction of a new 2- storey rear atrium addition within the
.tableland portion of the lot.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Revision 1, Basement Floor Plan, Drawing No. A2.0, Ground Floor Plan,
Drawing No. A2.0, and Second Floor Plan, Drawing No. A3.0, prepared by PC
Designers Collaborative, date received April 16, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
279
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a fill regulated area of the Don River to facilitate the
demolition of the hot tub enclosure and replacement with a screened porch, as well as the
construction of a new two- storey atrium addition onto the rear of the existing residence within
the tableland portion of the lot.
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located outside of the Regional Storm flood plain, therefore the control of
flooding will not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected during construction as the work site is located approximately 80
metres from the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed rear porch will maintain a 8.5 metre setback from the top of bank, while the
atrium addition will maintain a 10.5 metre setback. The proposed additions are consistent with
existing development in the corridor reach and will not impact on any significant resource
features. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33171
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 3, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
- of the Authority's Valley
Application #: 169/02/TOR
8.1.17 1385329 ONTARIO LIMITED
To place fill within a regulated area on Block 42, Plan 65M -2464, in the City of
Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 1385329
Ontario Limited.
The purpose is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of the
Humber River to facilitate a future building envelope on a commercial lot within a Registered
Plan of Subdivision. This submission represents the resolution of a Ontario Regulation 158
violation previously issued to the applicants.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Drawing SP1, prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc., Project 01110, dated
April 2002.
280
• Rough Grading Plan, Drawing RG -1, prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc., Project
01110, dated March 2002.
• Landscape Plan, Drawing L1, prepared by Insite Landscape Architects Inc., Protect
010424, dated May 31, 2001 revised to April 18, 2002.
• Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Commercial Development, Block 42, Registered
Plan 65M -2464, prepared by Trow Consulting Engineers, Project BRGE0063743A,
dated April 10, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves fill placement, site grading and the creation of a re- engineered valley
slope w thin Lot 42 of Registered Plan of Subdivision 65M -2464, a commercial /industrial plan
approved prior to the implementation of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program (VSCMP) policies. The property is almost entirely within the valley
corridor of a tributary reach of the Humber River and contains portions of its Regional Storm
Floodplain. Upon application for re- zoning and site plan approval for the development of the
entire.lot, staff outlined current policies to the applicants and advised that, notwithstanding
prior approvals and current planning designations, the proposal must demonstrate adherence
to VSCMP policies to the extent possible, without compromising the integrity of the valley
corridor. During review of these applications, the applicants had begun placing fill material
onto the property in the absence of TRCA approvals. TRCA Enforcement staff subsequently
issued a violation notice and legal proceedings were commenced shortly after under the
charge of unlawfully permitting fill to be placed within a prohibited area, without TRCA
approval.
In seeking resolution of the violation in con unction with the review of the proposed
development, Authority staff required that f II material be removed, that the valley corridor form
and function be re- instated and maintained, and that no encroachment or fill placement within
the floodplain would be permitted. In addition, the proposal was to include a detailed
restoration plan for disturbed areas including enhancements to the corridor reach where
appropriate. Plans and reports submitted in this submission for approval represent on -going
d scussions with the applicant, and have now been produced to the satisfaction of staff. The
proposal will include a building envelope encompassing approximately one half of the total
area of the lot, a re- engineered slope condition and detailed restoration plantings of the slope
and valley floor. Lands comprising the slope and valley floor will be integrated within the
adjacent Open Space corridor as a condition of approval for the re- zoning application.
In addition to Conditions imposed by this permit application, this submission and all
requirements are to be reflected within a settlement agreement and court order negotiated with
the applicants to resolve matters relating to the charges. The minutes of settlement reached
include a guilty plea on all charges, fines, the removal of material and re- instatement of the
lands in accordance with the plans and technical reports accompanying this submission. In
addition, a letter of credit is to be secured by the TRCA in the event that works are not
completed in the timeframe allocated.
281
Control of Flooding:
All proposed works and re- engineered slope are to be conducted outside the limits of the
Regional Storm Floodplain and accordingly, there will be no impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing has been installed to prevent sediment from entering the
watercourse and valley corridor. Additional sediment controls are to be installed upon
commencement of the restoration works.
Conservation of Land:
The proposal requires slope engineering and restoration and staff are satisfied that the works
will serve to improve the corridor reach.and provide an appropriate interface between new
development and the valley corridor. The restored areas and the balance of valley lands on
the property will come under public ownership as a condition of zoning approval.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal has been reviewed in accordance with Section 4.2 - New Development, of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies and staff are satisfied
that the works address these policies appropriately. ,
CFN: 31814
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 28, 2002
Application #: 375 /00/VAUG
8.1.18 CITY OF VAUGHAN
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 30, 31, Concession 6,
(Kirby Road west of Pine Valley Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Vaughan.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse to facilitate the replacement of an existing culvert
crossing of a tributary of the Humber River under Kirby Road, west of Pine Valley Drive.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Letter signed by Chris Bhawanie dated April 10, 2002 providing construction details.
• Drawing S -1 issued by URS Cole Sherman on May 13, 2002, received by TRCA on
May 14, 2002.
• Drawing S -2 prepared by URS Cole Sherman on May 13, 2002, received by TRCA on
May 14, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
282
Proposal: The proposal is to alter a watercourse to facilitate the replacement of an existing
culvert crossing of a tributary of the Humber River under Kirby Road and subsequent widening
of the road.
Control of Flooding: The new culvert will match the existing culvert capacity, therefore the
works are not expected to impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution: Sediment fencing will be installed around the works outside the watercourse, and a
temporary granular dyke will be constructed. Water will be pumped through a temporary
wetland filter bag a minimum of 15 metres from the river. Therefore appropriate measures
have been taken to minimize sedimentation.
Conservation of Land: Potential impacts to fisheries habitat are mitigated through the use of
sediment control measures, completing the works in the dry by pumping any flow around the
site, and complying with the cold water construction timing window of June 15 to September
15.
Policy Guidelines: The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32948
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Patricia Young, extension 5324
Date: February 14, 2002
Application #: 060 /02NAUG
8.1.19 KEITH DUNCAN
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot H, Plan
1200, (65 Wallace Street), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Keith Duncan.
The purpose is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of the
Humber River to facilitate the construction of an extention to an existing decic structure..
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan of Lot "H°, Plan 1200, Village of Woodbridge Illustrating existing and proposed
deck dimensions and construction notes, dated received by TRCA, May 15th, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
283
Proposal:
The proposal is to permit a minor extention of an existing deck within the Fill Regulated Area
and Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Humber River. The existing deck and
dwelling are located well beyond the channel bank of the Humber River at the flood fringe. The
deck is less than 50% of the size of the existing deck structure and qualifies as a minor addition
allowable by Authority policy.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no change to existing grades and no measurable fill placement, therefore, the
proposal will not affect the control of flooding.
Pollution:
All excavated material is to be removed off site and the proposal will not contribute to pollution.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas are to be immediately stabilized and sodded upon completion of works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33222
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 17, 2002
Application #: 194 /02/VAUG
8.1.20 DIEGO MUZZATTI
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 35, Plan
M -1111, (120 Riverside Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Diego Muzzatti.
The purpose is to place fill in a fill regulated area of the Humber River to facilitate construction
of two single family dwellings.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Muzzatti Residence House Siting and Grading - Lot 35 R, dated February 8, 2002
prepared by Flanagan Beresford and Patteson and received by TRCA on March 21,
2002.
• Muzzatti Residence House Siting and Grading - Lot 35 L, dated February 8, 2002
prepared by Flanagan Beresford and Patteson and received by TRCA on March 21,
2002.
• Letter of undertaking prepared by Diego Muzzatti received by TRCA via Fax on May
16, 2002.
284
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal: '
The proposal is to construct two single family dwellings within the Fill Regulated Area and
Special Policy Area of the Humber River. The application is related to a City of Vaughan
consent application. The original home has been removed and the land has been divided into
two lots. The proposed buildings are set back more than 10 metres from the river bank, and
the lands below the river bank have been transferred to TRCA. The proposed development will
not result in loss of any natural features.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed dwellings will be located on a high spot in the Special Policy Area and will be
completely outside of the Regional Storm Flood plain. Therefore there will be no impact on the
storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be erected prior to construction and will remain until the works are
complete and the area has been sodded to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The property is located within a developed portion of the Humber River valley. The subject
property is currently a residential lot. There are no resource features on the property and the
proposed houses will be safely set back from the 100 year erosion limit and more than 10
metres from the river bank.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1(C) - Existing Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor management Program.
CFN: 33058
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: April 3, 2002
Application #: 126 /02/VAUG
8.1.21 ROYBRIDGE HOLDINGS LIMITED
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 6,7,8,
Concession 9, (Highway 27 and Highway 7), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Roybridge Holdings Limited.
The purpose is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within the floodplain and Fill
Regulated Area of the Humber River, to facilitate slope stabilization works on a
decommissioned landfill site..
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
285
• SWM Pond Details (Section Y -Y only), Drawing DET -3, Vaughan West (North)
Business Park, prepared by Urban Ecosystems Limited, dated November 2001,
revised to April 2002, and accompanying revised marked up drawing illustrating
sediment controls and site restoration, dated received by TRCA, May 27, 2002.
• Grading Plan, Drawing G -22, Vaughan West (North) Business Park, prepared by Urban
Ecosystems Limited, dated November 2001, revised to April 2002, and accompanying
revised marked up cross - section illustrating volume of fill material, dated received by
TRCA, May 27, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposed works are being conducted to address an existing erosion problem along the
valley slope of Rainbow Creek (Humber River), which involves fill placement, regrading and
toe - protection to stabilize an eroding slope which contains decommissioned landfill material.
The works will necessitate the placement of approximately 14 cubic metres of fill material within
the floodplain. TRCA engineering staff have reviewed the proposal and are satisfied that the
volume of material within the floodplain will have negligible impacts to the control of flooding.
The existing toe-of -slope is located approximately 3.5m from the channel bank of the
watercourse and the proposed works will require toe - stabilization works to be situated within
2.5m of the channel bank. TRCA staff are satisfied that the proposed works are necessary to
prevent future slope failure, which would have significant negative environmental impact if left
unabated. The works are being undertaken in conjunction with Conditions of Draft Approval for
Plan of Subdivision 19T- 89058, City of Vaughan.
Control of Flooding:
Approximately 14 cubic metres of fill material will be placed within the floodplain to facilitate the
works. TRCA engineering staff have determined impacts to floodplan hydraulics to be
negligible, and therefore, there will be no measurable impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing is to installed prior to the commencement of construction to prevent
sediment from entering the watercourse. The applicants have commissioned detailed
geotechnical reports illustrating the need for the works and recommendations, to the
satisfaction -of TRCA staff.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas are to be immediately stabilized and sodded upon completion of works.
Detailed landscaping and enhancement of this corridor reach is being reviewed under separate
application for clearance of conditions for the Plan of Subdivision (19T- 89058)
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.3. - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
286
CFN: 33240
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 23, 2002
TOWN OF CALEDON
Application #: 199 /02NAUG
8.1.22 SANDY KUMAR '
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 4, Part Block 40, Plan 43M -1159, (4
Deer Hollow Court), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Sandy Kumar.
The purpose is to move /place fill in a regulated area in order to install an inground swimming
pool at 4 Deer Hollow Court, Bolton.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan View, dated received May 23, 2002.
• Redline revised to show where silt fencing should be established for duration of
construction and to note that all excess fill should be removed from site.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To move /place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to install an inground swimming pool on the
existing residential lot, located in Bolton, in the developed portion of the Humber River Valley.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore will
not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be in place for the duration of construction, in order to prevent sedimentation of
the adjacent watercourse. All excess fill will be removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
The property is located within the developed portion of the Humber River valley, in the former
Village of Bolton. The proposed swimming pool is consistent with existing development in the
corridor reach, and will not affect any significant natural features. There are no geotechnical
issues associated with the proposal.
287
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E), Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33250
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: May 27, 2002
Application #: 208 /02 /CAL
8.1.23 PAUL ADRIAN & HELEN THERESA YOUNG
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part 3 Plan
43R -9985, Part Lot 82, 83, Block 1, Plan BOL -7, (58 John Street), in the Town of
Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Paul
Adrian & Helen Theresa Young.
The purpose is to place fill material within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of a Fill Regulated
Area of the Humber River to accommodate the construction of a fenced above ground pool
and deck.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan Drawing of Venus II 16X32 Swimming Pool Kit on 58 John Street, prepared by
Medallion Pools, dated March 19, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Paul Adrian Young and Helen Theresa Young.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place fill material within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of a Fill Regulated
Area of the Humber River to accommodate the construction of a fenced above ground pool
and deck. The subject property is located within the Bolton Special Policy Area (SPA) which
allows for development within the floodplain provided it meets SPA criteria. The proposed
works meet all applicable SPA criteria.
Control of Flooding:
Impacts to flooding should be minimal as the pool structure is not very large and will be
located over 30 metres and two residential lots away from the watercourse
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed around the proposed works to prevent
construction generated sediments from entering the watercourse.
288
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored following construction. As there will be no instream works,
there are no concerns related to fish habitat loss. No significant resource features will be
impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33050
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: April 2, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 120 /02 /CAL
8.1:24 ABDOLVAHAB (CAMRAN) PAK
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Plan 65M -2548, (217 Garden Ave.), in
the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Abdolvahab (Camran) Pak.
The purpose is to place fill and grade within the Fill Regulated area of the Don River to facilitate
construction of a new single family dwelling within an approved subdivision.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Letter prepared by Alex Mohebat dated May 7, 2002 and received by TRCA on May 6,
2002.
• Site Plan of Lot 7, Registered Plan 65M -2548 by Rowan - Stancio Ltd. dated March 15,
received by TRCA on March 27, 2002.
• Untitled plan detailing x- section A -A received by TRCA March 27, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To place fill and grade the site to facilitate construction of a single family dwelling located
entirely within a Fill Regulated area of the Don River. The proposed structure will be located
within the valley corridor on an existing lot of record within approved plan of subdivision. The
encroachment of the structure onto the valley side slope is consistent with building setbacks
within this reach of the Don River system. There are no other viable building envelopes on the
lot.
289
Control of Flooding:
There are no flooding concerns as the proposed structure and associated works are not
located within the regional storm flood plain
Pollution:
No sedimentation of the watercourse is expected as the proposed works are 100 metres from
the watercourse and the rear portion of the construction area is not sloped.
Conservation of Land:
A geotechnical assessment of bank stability prepared by Soil Eng. Limited was reviewed by
TRCA staff and found acceptable. All exposed areas will be re- vegetated upon completion of
the construction and the proposed works will not impact any significant resource features on
the site. The subject lot is in plan of subdivision approved by TRCA staff prior to the Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program. The proposed house will be situated below the top of
bank, but this is consistent with development on the adjacent lots. The subject lot is the last
vacant lot on the street and there is no other viable building envelope on the lot.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (G) - Infilling of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program and consistent with other development on the street.
CFN: 33059
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: April 3, 2002
TOWNSHIP OF ADJALA - TOSORONTIO
Application #: 125/02/RH
8.1.25 EMILIO CANCELLIERE
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, Concession 5 (9710 Highway #9), in
the Township of Adjala - Tosorontio, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Emilio Cancelliere.
The purpose is to place fill in a fill regulated area and within the Regional Storm flood plain of
the Humber River in order to fill in an existing pond.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Site Plan submitted by the applicant, date received June 19, 2001.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
290
Proposal:
The subject property is traversed by the Humber River and contains a restaurant and gas bar.
The existing pond was excavated several years ago and was originally an on -line facility.
Several years ago, the connecting pipe to the Humber River was removed due to a concern
with sewace from the private sewage system entering the pond and then flowing into the river.
The pond s now an off-line facility and has become stagnant with odour problems. As a result,
the landowner proposes to fill in the pond with peat material which was previously excavated
from the pond and has been stockpiled on the site for a number of years. The pond will be
filled to match surrounding grades and the owner intends to utilize the area as a picnic and
park area for his customers.
Control of Flooding:
The off -line pond will be filled to match existing surrounding grades and will therefore, not
impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The works are not expected to result in sedimentation of the watercourse as the site slopes
away from the river and towards the north and drains into a drainage swale which flows
easterly into a swamp area at the rear of the property, however; a silt fence will be installed
between the work site and the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed filling of the pond will alleviate both the odour problem originating from the
stagnant pond and rectify an outstanding problem with stockpiled peat material within the
Regional Storm flood plain. The pond site will be seeded and will be used as a park area for
customers of the restaurant and gas bar. The proposed works are not expected to impact on
any significant resource features.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33196
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 13, 2002
CITY OF BRAMPTON
Application #: 185/02/ADJ
8.1.26 ISLAMIC SHIA ITHNA - ASHERI JAMAAT ( I.S.I.J.) OF TORONTO
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 13 , 14, Concession 1;
Part Lot 13, 14, Plan 432- 14219, (Kennedy Road South), in the City of Brampton,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Islamic Shia
Ithna- Asheri Jamaat (I.S.I.J.) of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a regulated area to facilitate a sanitary sewer
crossing of the Etobicoke Creek by directional bore method.
291
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing No. 1, Masumeen Islamic Centre,
April 2002.
• Drawing No. 2, Masumeen Islamic Centre,
April 2002, revised May 21, 2002.
prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated
prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a regulated area to facilitate a sanitary sewer
crossing of the Etobicoke Creek by directional bore method. The sanitary line is supporting a
recently approved development for the Masumeen Islamic Centre and the crossing is
necessary to connect to the existing sewer trunk line on the opposite side of the creek. The
bore pit locations will be outside of the regulatory flood elevation and the sewer crossing will
maintain a minimum depth of 1.5 metres below the watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
No excavated material will be stockpiled within the regulatory flood elevation and all existing
grades will be maintained. The proposed works will therefore not impact on the storage or
conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will encircle the bore pits to impede the migration of construction generated
sediments and all disturbed areas will be revegetated following construction.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no instream works and no impact to riparian vegetation. The sanitary sewer line
crossing will utilize a directional bore method and maintain a minimum 1.5 metre depth below
the watercourse. The bore pit locations will be protected by sediment and erosion control
fencing and revegetated following construction. There are no fisheries or geotechnical issues
related to this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33198
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: May 14, 2002
292
Application #: 187/02/BRAM
CITY OF PICKERING
8.1.27 TED WILLIAMSON
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 32, Concession 1; Part Lot 1 -10, Plan
49R- 20936, (Altona Road), in the City of Pickering, Petticoat Creek Watershed as
located on the property owned by Ted Williamson.
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area of Petticoat Creek to facilitate site servicing and
grading associated with the development of 4 newly created residential lots.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2007 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Servicing and Grading Plan, Drawing No. GR -101, prepared by Sernas
Associates, dated February, 2002, date received May 2, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is located adjacent to the Petticoat Creek valley corridor and as such is
located partiall;, within the fill regulated area associated with Petticoat Creek. The proposed
works involve tie placement of fill within the ill regulated portion of the property to faci itate site
servicing and grading associated with the development of 4 residential lots created through
Region of Durham consent applications, LD 102/2001 to LD 106/2002.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is located entirely outside of the Regional Storm flood plain, therefore the
control of flooding will not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion controls are to be implemented on site (i.e. silt fencing to be installed)
prior to any construction and /or grading works occurring in order to prevent sediment from
entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
A 10 metre development limit for the 4 new residential lots was established by TRCA staff
based on a stable slope line as defined by a geotechnical assessment of the valley slope. As a
result, only the extreme rear tableland portion of the lots is fill regulated. The valley lands and
hazardous slope areas have been zoned in an appropriate Open Space category to restrict
development. The proposed development is consistent with existing development in the
corridor reach and will not impact on any significant resource features. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
293
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.1 - New Urban Development - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33178
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 7, 2002
294
Application #: 174/02 /PICK
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES. #B64/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Michael Di Biase
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.28 - 8.1.50, with the exception of 8.1.40 - Angelico Investments Inc., which was
withdrawn), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items, for which all the
required information was received and finalized as listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.28 TUMBRIDGE ESTATES INC. /CARLO BALDASSARRA
To place fill within a regulated area on East Half Lot 7, Concession 9, in the City of
Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Tumbridge Estates Inc. /Carlo Baldassarra.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a fill regulated area and the regulatory storm
floodplain to facilitate development of new single - family residences on five Tots within a draft
approved plan of subdivision.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2007.
• Grading Plan, drawing no. 5A, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., dated
February 2001.
• Fill Cross - sections A -A, B -B, C -C, D -D, and E -E, prepared by David Schaeffer
Engineering, faxed May 21, 2002.
• Cut Cross - section X -X, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., dated May
2002.
• Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Simon Humg of David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd.,
dated May 27, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
295
Proposal:
The proposal is necessary to facilitate the development of five Tots within a draft approved plan
of subdivision. The works involve a balance cut and fill on opposite sides of the stream
corridor, within the regulatory flood elevation. The cut is necessary to balance the loss of flood
storage created by the fill placement. The fill placement is part of an engineered slope that is
needed in the rear portions of five Tots to mitigate a two metre grade differential between the
roadway and the rear lot lines. In order to maintain a 5 metre level yard area with a stable
slope to the rear lot line, it is necessary to extend the fill placement beyond the lot line and
regulatory flood elevation up to a minimal distance of 3.8 metres. The cut and fill areas, which
are currently void of woody vegetation, will be revegetated with appropriate native woody and
herbacious materials.
Control of Flooding:
The fill placement is to be balanced by a cut on the opposite side of the stream corridor. The
slopes in the cut area are gradual and stable.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed between the proposed works and the
stream corridor and watercourse. All disturbed areas will be revegetated with appropriate
native /non- invasive species.
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the proposal —The slopes
created by the fill placement will be engineered 2.5:1 slopes and the cut area will result in a
stable 4:1 slope.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 3.2.2 - Policies and Procedures For Establishing
Corridor Boundaries and Alterations - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program.
CFN: 33236
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: May 23, 2002
CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
Application #: 197/02 /BRAM
8.1.29 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, Concession 5 EHS, (Eglinton Avenue),
in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property
owned by City of Mississauga.
The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area, in order to widen the existing Eglinton
Avenue span bridge, where it crosses over the Little Etobicoke Creek, east of Tomken Road in
Mississauga.
296
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• TRCA -3, Typical Bridge Section, dated April 18, 2002.
• NC-3, New Construction, dated January 20, 2001.
• NC-4, New Construction, dated January 20, 2001.
• EP -1, Sediment and Erosion Control, dated May 8, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking for water quality control and typical details of coffer dam and
sediment controls, dated June 5, 2002 from Marshall Macklin Monaghan.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to widen the existing Eglinton Avenue span bridge,
where it crosses the Little Etobicoke Creek, east of Tomken Road in Mississauga. The
widening will match the current bridge location, with its footings outside of the Regional Storm
Flood Plain. ,
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Etobicoke
Creek, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
No work is proposed within the watercourse, and therefore the proposal does not require an
authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. A letter of advice will be provided
to the applicant detailing required mitigative measures. Sedimentation of the watercourse will
be prevented with sediment and erosion control measures, to be in place for the duration of
construction.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical issues associated with the proposal and no significant natural
features will be affected. Erosion will be prevented with sediment and erosion control
measures, to be in place for the duration of construction. Once the work is complete, any
disturbed areas will be restored with the planting of native, woody species and a native,
non - invasive grass seed mix.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33142
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: April 24, 2002
297
Application #: 158/02 /MISS ,
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
8.1.30 BRIAN FLETCHER
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 30, Plan 2991, (43 Mill Cove), in the City
of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Joe Gussoni.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Humber River, in order to
facilitate the construction of a new addition to an existing dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• Survey, Site Plan, Existing Basement, First and Second Floor, Existing Elevations,
Proposed Basement, First and Second Floor, Proposed Elevations, submitted by the
applicant, received February 11, 2002.
• Letter prepared by Soil -Eng Limited, dated May 31, 2002, received June 3, 2002,
stating that the footings for the proposed addition will be founded at a depth of 2.5m
at el. 99.4 m. meeting the stipulation contained in their Soil Investigation Report,
Reference No. 0203 -S8, dated April 2002, and therefore considered to be
geotechnically satisfactory.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Humber River in order to
facilitate the construction of an addition to an existing dwelling.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm floodplain, and will therefore
not affect the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located entirely on tableland, approximately 15 meters (50 feet) from
the Humber River. Sediment fencing will be installed between the proposed works and the top
of bank during and after the construction process. Sedimentation as a result of construction is
not expected to reach the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The soils of the area contain stable bedrock, and the slopes are well vegetated. Staff have
visited the site, and reviewed a geotechnical report with regards to the proposed works, and
determine that there will be no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with this project.
The addition will not project into the valley feature beyond the existing rear wall of the house,
and is consistent with existing uses along the corridor reach.
298
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are in compliance with Section 4.2.2 (C) - Minor Additions - of the
Authorities Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32958
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 15, 2002
Application #: 070 /02/TOR
8.1.31 CITY OF TORONTO
To alter a waterway on Lot 33, Concession 2 FTH; Plan MA -4750, (Highway 27), in
the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed
as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a fill regulated area to facilitate the relocation of a
watermain crossing the Humber River by directional bore method.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• Highway 27 Watermaln Replacement drawings, no.s U- 1796 -1, U- 1796 -2, U- 1796 -3,
prepared by Ed Yathindra of Etobicoke Works and Emergency Services, dated May
23, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Ed Yathindra, dated May 10, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal: .
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a fill regulated area to facilitate the relocation of a
watermain crossing the Humber River by directional bore method. The proposed works are an
emergency response to a breakage in the existing watermain. The new crossing has a depth
of 2 metres below the watercourse and is located adjacent to the previous crossing.
Control of Flooding:
No excavated material is to be stockpiled within the regional storm floodplain and all existing
grades are to be maintained. There are no anticipated impact from the works on the storage or
conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Silt fencing encircles the bore pit locations to impede the overland migration of construction
generated sediments.
299
Conservation of Land:
There are no instream works or impacts to riparian vegetation. The watermain crossing is 2
metres below the watercourse. The bore pit locations are setback from the top of bank and
encircled by sediment and erosion control fencing. There are no fisheries concerns or
geotechnical issues related to these works.
Policy Guidelines:
The works comply with section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33199
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: May 14, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 188/02/TOR
8.1.32 DOMENIC MARZANO C/O ENZA REALTY LIMITED
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 23, 24, Concession 8; Plan 65R- 19910,
(10515 Highway 27), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Domenic Marzano c/o Enza Realty Limited.
The purpose is to place fill within a fill regulated area of the Humber River to facilitate
construction of a proposed daycare /Montessori school.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• Site Plan SP -1 prepared by Soscia Engineering Limited, dated May 30, 2002.
• Details drawing SP prepared by Soscia Engineering Limited, dated May 30, 2002.
• Letter from Shaheen and Peaker Limited dated May 16, 2002 regarding geotechnical
concerns.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
Construct an addition to an existing structure, increased parking space and a playground area
to a proposed daycare /Montessori school in the valley and fill regulated area of the Humber
River. There is an existing building on the property which is on a small shelf on the south side
of the Humber River valley. The proposed works will be removed from the edge of the shelf
and will not be located closer to the watercourse than existing structures. The construction will
not result in a loss of natural features or encroachment towards the valley slope.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are outside of the regional storm flood plan, and therefore there will be no
impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
300
Pollution:
The proposed works are 50 metres from the watercourse and all construction areas will be
contained with sediment fence. No sedimentation to the watercourse is expected.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical concerns with the property. Natural features will not be impacted by
the proposed development. All disturbed areas will be restored in accordance with a planting
plan submitted by the applicant and approved by TRCA staff. The proposed works are not
located closer to the watercourse than the existing structures.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 (Existing Development) of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33087
Report Prepared by: Patricid Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: April 12, 2002
Application #: 142 /02/VAUG
8.1.33 DOUG TODD
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 106, Plan 65M -2810, (57 Longview
Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Tony Adessi.
The purpose is to excavate fill material in conjunction with the installation of an in- ground
swimming pool.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• Adessi Residence - Plan showing pool location, received by TRCA on May 3, 2002.
• Letter of undertaking prepared by Doug Todd dated May 29, 2002 addressing
sediment removal and restoration.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating fill material as part of the installation of an in- ground
swimming pool. The subject property is located partially within the Fill Regulated Area of the
Humber River. No part of the lands are situated within the Regional Storm Flood Plain.
Control of Flooding:
Since the subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, there will be no
impacts on flooding.
301
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from these works as they are located more than 50 metres from
the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed pool is set back from the top of bank, and there are no natural features on the
property. All disturbed areas are to be restored following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 E (Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures)
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33241
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 24, 2002
Application #: 204 /02/VAUG
8.1.34 RANDI EMMOTT
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 5, Plan 8955, (57 Chavender Place), in
the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Randi Emmott.
The purpose is to build an addition to an existing home within a fill regulated area of the
Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• Proposed addition to 57 Chavender Place prepared by Mitch Designs dated April
2002, received by TRCA on April 23, 2002 and red line revised by Randi Emmott on
April 23, 2002.
• Retaining wall details, 57 Chavender Place, received by TRCA on May 31, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of constructing an addition to a single family dwelling within the fill
regulated area of the Humber River, and to replace retaining walls currently supporting
gardens. The subject property is within an existing residential neighborhood in the City of
Vaughan and backs onto the Humber River valley. The proposed works are set back from the
top of bank and will be built on an area where there is an existing patio. The subject property
is currently sodded and proposed construction will not result in a loss of any natural features.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are outside of the Regional Storm Flood plain and therefore there will be
no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
302
Pollution:
The proposed works are over 200 metres from the watercourse, and the proposed works are
appropriately set back from the top of bank. No sedimentation is expected.
Conservation of Land:
No natural features will be affected by the construction, and there are no geotechnical
concerns with the construction (waiting for written comments from Nick, received verbal).
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2, (Existing Development) of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33022
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: March 14, 2002
8.1.35
Application #: 111 /02/VAUG
MICHAEL AND ANGELA CACCAMO
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Plan 65M -2907, (756 Clarence Street),
in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Michael and Angela Caccamo.
The purpose is to construct a single family dwelling on a lot partially within the Fill Regulated
area of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• Site Plan - Proposed Residence for Michael Caccamo prepared by Architectural
Design Co. Inc. dated April, 2002 and received by TRCA on May 14, 2002.
• Letter of undertaking submitted via E -mail from Michael Caccamo on May 29, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
Construct a single family dwelling on a vacant lot in an approved subdivision partially within the
Fill Regulated area of the Humber River. The subject property is within an existing
neighbourhood of Woodbridge and backs onto a-valley associated with the Humber River. The
construction and grading will be in accordance with the approved subdivision plan. All works
are set back from the top of bank. There are no natural features on the property.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are outside of the Recional Storm Flood Plain and therefore there will be
no impact on the storage or conveyance o- flood waters.
303
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be erected prior to construction and will remain until the works are
complete and the construction area has been sodded to prevent sedimentation of the
watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The property is located within a developed portion of the City of Vaughan. The subject
property is currently a residential lot and there are no resource features on the property.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.1 (New Urban Development) of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33170
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 3, 2002
Application #: 168 /02/VAUG
8.1.36 THE EARTH RANGERS FOUNDATION
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Concession 7; Lot 17, 18,
Plan 65R- 23762, (The Kortright Centre for Conservation), in the City of Vaughan,
Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by The Earth Rangers
Foundation.
The purpose is to place fill in a fill regulated area of the Humber River in the Kortright
Conservation Area on lands leased from TRCA to facilitate construction of a wildlife
rehabilitation centre.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• New Roadway Construction Plan and Profile prepared by Philips Engineering dated
April 2002.
• Site Grading Plan prepared by Philips Engineering dated February 2002 and received
by TRCA on May 28, 2002.
• Drawing Number 20.01.568.02 prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan dated 2001
received by TRCA on May 28, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by Roman Kobylinski dated May 28, 2002 addressing
outstanding issues related to engineering.
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by Roman Kobylinski dated June 5, 2002 addressing
outstanding Issues related to landscaping.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
304
Proposal:
To place fill, excavate and regrade a section of land partially within the Fill Regulated Area of
the Humber River to facilitate construction of a wildlife rehabilitation centre. The land is within
the Kortright Conservation Area and will be leased from TRCA on a long term basis. The
construction requires a road realignment, construction of the wildlife hospital, associated
parking, an intern residence and outdoor wildlife pens. The location of the proposed
construction has gone through many iterations through a lengthy review and revision process
with TRCA staff and is satisfactory.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are outside of the regional storm flood plain, therefore there will be no
impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be installed along the valley corridor and as the proposed works are
over 100 metres from the watercourse, no sedimentation of the watercourse is expected.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed construction area is a outside of the valley corridor and proposed construction is
set back from the top of bank. There will be no encroachment within the valley, and there are
no geotechnical concerns. Trees removed to facilitate road construction and construction of
the building will be replaced with appropriate native species. Due to the nature of the facility,
dense plantings will be undertaken at the limits of development to provide protection and
coverage for the rehabilitating wildlife.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.1 (New Development) of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Plan.
CFN: 33191
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 9, 2002
TOWN OF CALEDON
Application #: 181 /02/VAUG
8.1.37 CLUBLINK CORPORATION
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Part Lot 14, 24, Plan 43M -919, (RR #2, Regional Road 50), in the Town of Caledon,
Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Clublink
Corporation.
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a fill regulated area of the Humber River to
accommodate modifications of the existing Caledon Woods golf course..
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
305
• Site Plan - Overall Site, Drawing No. S1, prepared by Paul Takahashi, dated February
2001, revised April 17, 2002.
• Site Servicing Plan, Drawing No. S2, prepared by Paul Takahashi, dated February
2001, revised April 17, 2002.
• Cut and Fill Thematic, Drawing No. W4C, prepared by Philips Engineering, dated
February 2001, revised April 17, 2002.
• Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Drawing No. W4B, prepared by Philips
Engineering, dated February 2001, revised April 17, 2002.
• Erosion and Sediment Control Details, Drawing No. W5, prepared by Philips
Engineering, dated January 2001, revised April 17, 2002.
• Golf Course Drainage System Plan, Drawing No. W6, prepared by Philips Engineering,
dated May 2001, revised April 17, 2002.
• Golf Course Planting Plan, Drawing No. W11, prepared by prepared by Paul
Takahashi, dated July 2001, revised April 17, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Kenneth DePodesta of Philips Engineering, dated
May 27, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a fill regulated area of the Humber River to
accommodate modifications of the existing Caledon Woods golf course. The entire golf course
is being modified in an effort to reduce the total number of holes while improving environmental
impacts through increased setbacks and reforestation adjacent to significant natural areas.
The works proposed in this application relate only to the tableland areas of proposed holes 4,
5, 12, 13, and 14. The remaining hole modifications works within the valley corridor will be part
of a forthcoming permit application. These works are all setback from the top of bank and
involve final regrading and minimal vegetation disturbance. Any vegetation to be removed will
be replaced and new areas of re- vegetation are proposed as additional compensation.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore there will
be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be located between the proposed works and the
valley corridor to prevent construction generated sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The impacts of the proposed works on the surrounding significant resource features will be
minimal and lost vegetation will be replaced along with the provision of additional plantings as
compensation. There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to this portion of the
project.
306
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.2.2 H) - Development and
Redevelopment/Intensification within Established Communities / Highly Urbanized Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33176
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: May 6, 2002
Application #: 173/02/CAL
8.1.38 SCOTT WALDNER
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 23, Block
5, Plan BOL -7, (15 Mill Street), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Scott Weidner.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Regional Storm Floodplain within a Fill
Regulated Area of the Humber River to accommodate the construction of a paved parking area
and flood protection berm repair works..
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• Site Plan, drawing no. stpin 0044 -1, prepared by the Town of Caledon, dated May 29,
2001, revised May 22, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Regional Storm Floodplain within a Fill
Regulated Area of the Humber River to accommodate the construction of a paved parking area
and flood protection berm repair works. The subject property is located within the Bolton
Special Policy Area (SPA) which allows for development with n the floodplain provided it meets
SPA criteria. The proposed design meets all applicable criteria as the parking lot will be
located outside of the hydraulic f oodway which is contained by the flood protection berm. The
flood protection berm is also being repaired as a part of the proposed works. The repairs
consist of replacing and revegetating a small amount of fill that was previously removed from
the base of the berm.
Control of Flooding:
Impacts to flooding should be minimal as most of the property has already been compacted
and used as an informal parking facility.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed and maintained between the proposed
works and the watercourse during construction to prevent construction generated sediments
from entering the watercourse.
307
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed and exposed areas will be revegetated following construction. As there will be no
instream works there are no concerns related to fish habitat Toss. No significant resource
features will be impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33256
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: May 27, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 211 /02 /CAL
8.1.39 ALEX OUMNIAGUINE
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 79, Plan M -1325, (17 Village Squire Lane),
in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Alex Oumniaguine.
The purpose is to place fill in a Regulated Area in order to construct a single family dwelling in
an established neighbourhood in the Town of Markham.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• Lot Drainage and House Siting Control Plan, dated April` 25, 2002, prepared by David
Horwood Limited (OLS).
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To place /move fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to construct a single family dwelling on an
existing residential lot, in an established neighbourhood in the Town of Markham. The rear
extent of the new structure will be set back approximately 7 metres from the stable top of bank.
This setback is consistent with adjacent properties.
Control of Flooding:
The property is not located in a Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore there will be no
impact on the conveyance or storage of flood waters.
308
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be established on site for the duration of construction, to prevent sedimentation
of the adjacent watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical issues related to the project and no significant natural resource
features will be affected. Any disturbed areas will be restored to their original condition, with
sod.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (G), Infilling, of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33257
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: May 27, 2002
Application #: 212 /02 /MARK
8.1.40 ANGELICO INVESTMENTS INC.
To place fill within a regulated area on Block A , C, Plan 4556, (8551, 8555, 8561
and 8601 Woodbine Avenue at Highway 7), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Angelico Investments Inc..
• Withdrawn
8.1.41 TOWN OF MARKHAM
To alter a waterway on Lot 25, 26, Concession 8, (Elgin Mills Road), in the Town of
Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by the Town
Of Markham.
The purpose is to replace an existing concrete culvert with a larger concrete culvert, to permit
the widening of Elgin Mills Road.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• SP -1, Culvert Replacement, prepared by Town of Markham, dated January 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To alter a waterway in order to facilitate the replacement of an existing concrete culvert with a
larger concrete culvert, in order to permit the widening of Elgin Mills Road.
309
Control of Flooding:
The proposed culvert replacement is appropriately sized and is not located in the Regional
Storm Flood Plain. Therefore, the storage or conveyance of flood waters will not be affected.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion controls will be established for the duration of the proposed works, in
order to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse. All instream works will take place within the
warmwater timing window of July 1 to March 31. Authority technical staff have determined that
the proposal does not require an authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
A letter of advice will be provided to the applicant detailing required mitigative measures.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical issues related to the project, and it will not affect any significant
natural resource features. Sediment and erosion controls will be in place for the duration of
construction. Once the works are complete, any disturbed areas will be restored with native,
non - invasive species.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32387
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: June 26, 2001
Application #: 205 /01 /MARK
8.1.42 TOWN OF MARKHAM
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Lot 31, Concession 8 , (Dickson Hill Bridge at 19th Avenue & Dickson Hill
Road -east of Highway 48, north of Elgin Mills Road), in the Town of Markham,
Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Markham.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (associated with the bridge deck, abutment. footing
and wingwall removals and installation) in a Fill Regulated Area; to construct a structure
(bridge, outfall channel) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; and to temporarily alter a
watercourse ( Little Rouge) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to September 15)
through coffer damming in order to work in the dry.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• Drawing S1; dated April 17, 2002; received May 24, 2002; prepared by Chisholm,
Fleming and Associates.
• Drawing L1; dated May 23, 2002; last revised May 23, 2002; received May 24, 2002;
prepared by Chisholm Fleming and Associates.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to the engineering drawings); dated
May 31, 2002; received May 31, 2002; prepared by the Town of Markham.
310
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the removal of the existing 5.5m span x 10 metre width x 1.7• metre
height bridge and replacement with a new 5.5 metre span x 11.6 metre width x 2.2 metre
height bridge over the Little Rouge within a Fill Regulated Area and a Regional Storm
Floodplain. The new bridge will have an open footing and retaining walls like the existing and
will be widened by 0.8m per side. The elevations of tie bridge footings will be lowered by 0.4m
to protect them from riverine erosion. Presently the footings are exposed and the proposed
design should resolve this problem. The opening of the bridge will remain the same.
Associated with the bridge reconstruction is an outfall channel with rip rap for stormwater.
Control of Flooding:
The hydraulics for the proposed bridge have been reviewed and it has been determined that
there will not be any negative impacts to the Regional water levels. All existing ground
elevations throughout the Regional Storm Floodplain will be maintained, therefore, the control
offlooding will not be impacted.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (coffer dam, pump, filter bag, silt fence) will be
implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the
watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project. A coffer dam will be installed in
order to work consecutively in the dry on each side of the bridge. With erosion and
sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction
(HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be sent to the applicant on
behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans upon Executive Committee approval. The
proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32983
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For Information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: May 28, 2002
311
Application #: 083 /02 /MARK
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
8.1.43 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 47, Concession 1 EYS, (Centre
Street from Newkirk Road to Pugsley Avenue -East of Yonge Street, North of Major
Mackenzie Drive), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Town of Richmond Hill.
The purpose is to construct structures (Centre Street reconstruction; twin box culvert,
armourstone wall) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (German Mills
Creek, tributary of Don River) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31)
through culvert lengthening and relocation and through temporarily diverting the watercourse
in order to remove the existing and install the new culverts in the dry. The subject property is
not regulated for fill placement at this time.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
• Sheets 1; 2 -Eng. stamped April 23, 2002; 3 and 4 -Eng. stamped April 26, 2002; 5 and
6 -Eng. stamped April 23, 2002; 7, 8 and 9 of 11 -Eng. stamped April 26, 2002.
• Cross Section Sheets 1800 -XS03; 1800 -XSO4; 1800 -XS05; 1854 -XS02; 1854 -XS03;
1854 -XSO4; 1854 -XS05; all dated January 2002; received May 1, 2002; prepared by
The Ainley Group.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to Engineering Drawings); dated
May 30, 2002; received June 3, 2002; prepared by the Town of Richmond Hill.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to Restoration Plans); dated May 30,
2002; received June 3, 2002; prepared by the Town of Richmond Hill.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The project consists of the reconstruction of Centre Street from Newkirk Road to Pugsley
Avenue. At present there are 3 culverts underneath the road which carry the flow of the
German Mills Creek. The plans involve the removal of the 3 existing culverts (one 3600mm x
1830mm box culvert and twin 1200mm corrugated steel pipes (CSPs)) and replacement with
twin precast box culverts (3600mm x 1500mm and 3000mm and 2400mm). The proposed
culverts will provide a channel for low flows and another for high flows. The project site is
located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the German Mills Creek. The site is not located
within a Fill Regulated Area at this time, but is located within a Fill Line Extension Area. The
road reconstruction was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment
process.
Control of Flooding:
The placement of the fill within the floodplain has been reviewed and it has been determined
that there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. The sizing of the
culverts has been reviewed and it has been determined that they are sized appropriately and
will not cause any negative impacts to flooding
312
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, splash pads, jersey barriers with geotextile
material, pea gravel bags, rock check dams, dam and pump around) will be implemented to
ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project. The road works will require the
lengthening of the existing culverts from 58 to 85 metres. Approximately 15 metres of existing
channel will be enclosed in the culverts at the upstream end of the existing culvert, with another
12 metres enclosed in the culverts at the downstream end. The flows will also be temporarily
diverted in order to work in the dry to install the new culverts. The existing watercourse will
need to be relocated slightly up and downstream to blend with the new culvert location. The in
stream works will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish
habitat and will require an authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO).
The owner has submitted a DFO application and a Letter of Intent which indicates the
compensation measures for the Toss of habitat. These compensation measures will include
riparian plantings; a low flow channel which will be countersunk and embedded with river -run
stone; elimination of the downstream weir and blockages within the existing culverts (fish
barriers); and inclusion of 16 wing deflectors within the culvert to provide fish refuge. When
the DFO authorization has been received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill,
Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit. The proposed works will not impact any
significant terrestrial resource feature.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32589
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: May 27, 2002
TOWNSHIP OF KING
Application #: 297/01/RH
8.1.44 YMCA OF GREATER TORONTO
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 8, 9, Concession 11, (1130011th
Concession), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by YMCA of Greater Toronto.
The purpose is to undertake grading and fill placement in order to facilitate the replacement of
a single lane bridge in the Fill Regulated area, a ropes course within the Regional Storm Flood
Plain and a rain shelter in the Fill Regulated area of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004.
313
• Site Plan Drawing Number 1 prepared by Eagle Bridge dated April 23, 2002 received
by TRCA May 29, 2002 accompanied by letter of Undertaking prepared April 24, 2002
by Bill Bisch of Eagle Bridge.
• Job Number 2143 sheets 1 through 6 prepared by Cedar Forest Products and ABC
Recreation dated February 21, 2002 - Shelter details.
• Section from Humber River Sheet Number 75 indicating location of shelter received
by TRCA on March 11, 2002.
• Elevation and Plan Details Bridge 12192 x 3658 prepared by Eagle Bridge dated
March 7, 2002 sheets 1 through 6 received by TRCA March 26, 2002.
• Section from Humber River Sheet Number 75 indicating location of bridge
replacement received by TRCA on March 11, 2002.
• Ropes course details Overhead View Climbing Wall, Overhead View High Elements
Challenge Course, Stand Alone Elements Group A, Stand Alone Elements Group B
submitted to TRCA March 11, 2002.
• Section from Humber River Sheet Number 75 indicating location of ropes course
received by TRCA on March 11, 2002.
• Letter of undertaking dated May 28, 2002 signed by Jim Whitehead.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to replace a one lane bridge over an intermittent tributary of the Humber River
within the Fill Regulated area, construct a ropes course within the Regional Storm Flood plain,
and a rain shelter in the Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The proposed bridge will
replace a bridge that became unsafe for use in 2001. The bridge will allow for access to the
other side of the river to allow for camper drop off and pick up, and emergency access. No
other access route is available. No in- stream works are proposed and the abutments of the
bridge will be built outside of the channel and set back from the river bank. The proposed
shelter and ropes course will be used for recreational purposes. The subject property will be
used as a children's YMCA day use camp beginning in 2002.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed shelter will not be within the Regional Storm Flood plain. The proposed bridge
is a replacement structure and will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood water as no
importation of fill will occur. The ropes course may be affected by flooding under Regional
Storm Conditions, but as the only structures installed will be poles and ropes, this will not affect
the storage or conveyance of flood water. The proposed ropes course is compliant with
Section 4.1.2 (New Resource Based Uses) of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program. In addition, existing grades will remain.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be installed to prevent migration of sediment into the Humber
River and a temporary bridge will be installed so no in- stream access will be required.
314
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact any significant resource features. As the works will be in
compliance with the cold water fishery construction guidelines and no works will occur in the
channel, there are no fisheries issues related to the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed bridge is consistent with Section 4.2.2 D (Replacement Structures) of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. The proposed ropes course
and proposed shelter is consistent with Section 4.1.2 (New Resource Based Uses) of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33014
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: March 13, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (MIDTOWN COMMUNITY)
Application #: 102 /02 /KING
8.1.45 CITY OF TORONTO
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Concession
3 EYS, (Victoria -401 Storm Trunk Sewer Access Road From Don Mills Road To
Duncan Mill Road), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don
River Watershed as located on the property owned by The Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to construct an access road within the Regional Storm flood plain and Fill
Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the upgrade of an existing pathway to a permanent
access road adjacent to the East Don River from Duncan Mill Road northerly approximately 200
metres to the storm outfall structure, to provide year -round access to the Victoria -401 Storm
Trunk Sewer for maintenance purposes.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Victoria -401 Storm Trunk Sewer Access Road, Duncan Mill Rd. to Outfall, Drawing No.
1250 -D- 19622, Sheet 1 of 1, prepared by City of Toronto Works & Emergency
Services, dated May 16, 2002, date received May 23, 2002.
• Restoration Planting Recommendation for Proposed Access Roadway, prepared by
TRCA Environmental Services Section, dated May 14, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
315
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a year round permanent access road adjacent to the East Don
River to permit vehicle access to an existing storm trunk and sanitary sewer system for
maintenance purposes. The work involves upgrading and realigning an existing pathway with
a gravel roadway, approximately 4 metres wide and approximately 200 metres long, having a
T- shaped turning area at the northern end, adjacent to the outfall structure. The access road
will be located on lands owned by the TRCA and under Management Agreement with the City
of Toronto Parks and Recreation Department. The roadway and turning area will maintain a
minimum 10 metre setback from the channel bank, which is gabion -lined within this reach.
Control of Flooding:
The access road will be constructed at grade, therefore the proposed works are not expected
to impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the roadway and the river and maintained during the
construction project in order to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The road alignment ensures the protection of the wetland area which is located to the north of
the proposed site and will maintain appropriate setbacks from the channel bank and toe of
valley slope. Minimal woody vegetation will be removed and any removed vegetation will be
replaced with native non - invasive species, as per the planting plan prepared by TRCA staff,
which will be implemented by the City of Toronto upon completion of the roadway. An
archaeological assessment of the site has been completed, as well the City of Toronto has
completed the public notification process.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. The proposed works will be
carried out on TRCA lands and are consistent with the Management Agreement with the City of
Toronto.
CFN: 30630
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 7, 1999
CITY OF TORONTO (EAST YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 243/99/NY
8.1.46 CITY OF TORONTO
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Winchester Street
east of Sumach Street), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area),
Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.
316
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the extension of an
existing storm sewer along Winchester Street and the access road into Riverdale Farm, for an
approximate distance of 120 metres, and the construction of a new concrete outfall structure,
being partially within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Proposed Storm Sewers, Winchester Street, Riverdale Farm
Property, Drawing No. U - 4697 -1, date received June 3, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the extension of
an existing storm sewer along Winchester Street and the access road into Riverdale Farm, for
an approximate distance of 120 metres, and the construction of a new concrete outfall
structure, being partially within the Regional Storm flood plain of the Don River. The outfall will
discharge into a swale and then into a small water quality pond which are being designed and
constructed by TRCA staff.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed outfall structure is located partially within the Regional Storm flood plain, but will
not affect the storage or conveyance of flood water as it will be countersunk into the ground
and all excess excavated fill material will be removed from the site.
Pollution:
Erosion control measures will be installed prior to construction and maintained to prevent
sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The storm sewer extension will be located within the existing roadway, while the new outfall
structure will be situated adjacent to the valley slope. The project involves minimal removal of
woody vegetation, and all disturbed areas will be restored to preconstruction conditions, or
better. There are no fishery or slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33268
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 3, 2002
317
Application #: 220/02/TOR
8.1.47 ROSS WALKER
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 38, 39, Plan 2967, Part Lot 40, Plan 2967,
(56 Hillside Drive), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ross Walker.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order to
facilitate the construction of a 12 sq. m. (130 sq. ft) foot deck addition and new hot tub
installation to an existing deck at the rear of the single family residence.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Construction Details, Deck Details, and Site Plan, prepared by the applicant, received
May 15, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order to
facilitate the construction of a 12 sq. m. (130 sq. ft.) deck addition and new hot tub installation
to an existing deck at the rear of the single family residence. The hot tub itself will rest at
ground level, and will not place excessive force on the deck piers.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River.
The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will therefore not be affected
Pollution:
The proposed works are located approximately 310 metres (1017 feet) from the watercourse.
There will be minimal excavation for the construction of the piers. There will be no excavation
for the installation of the hot tub. Sedimentation of the watercourse is not expected as a result
of the proposed works.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located a distance of 3 metres (10 feet) from the top of bank area.
The property has previously been filled and graded during the construction of the house. The
proposed works will not affect any significant resource features and is consistent with existing
development in the corridor reach. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated
with the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
318
CFN: 33263
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 31, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (MIDTOWN COMMUNITY)
Application #: 216/02/TOR
8.1.48 ENBRIDGE CONSUMERS GAS
To place fill within a regulated area on (Eglinton Avenue East just west of Leslie
Street), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the relocation
of a NPS 12 ST HP gas pipeline crossing under the West Don River by directional bore
method.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Plan prepared by Enbrldge Consumers Gas, Drawing No.
10-6411 -02, dated May 6, 2002, date received May 29, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate
the relocation of the exposed gas main crossing the West Don River, on the north side of the
Eglinton Avenue bridge. The new gas main will be installed beneath the river slightly upstream
of the existing gas line, utilizing the directional bore method.
Control of Flooding:
No excavated material will be stockpiled within the Regional Storm floodplain and all existing
grades will be maintained. The control of flooding will therefore, not be affected by the
proposed works.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the bore pits and the watercourse to impede the overland
migration of construction- generated sediments.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no in- stream works. The gas main will be installed through the use of directional
boring a minimum of 1.5 m. beneath the watercourse. No riparian vegetation will be impacted
by the proposed works. All disturbed areas will be revegetated following construction. There
are no fisheries concerns or geotechnical issues related to this project.
319
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33266
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 3, 2002
Application #: 219/02/TOR
8.1.49 GARRY ZENTIL
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 2, Plan 2469, (1 St. Margaret's Drive), in the City
of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Garry Zentil.
The purpose is to construct a one - storey solarium addition onto the rear (north side) of the
existing residence within the Regional Storm flood plain of the West Don River and within the
Hogg's Hollow Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Ground Floor Plan, Existing Ground Floor Plan, North Elevation and Partial
East Elevation, Existing North Elevation, Foundation Plan, Ground Floor Plan, Roof
Framing Plan, Wall Section, Stair Section, Drawing Nos. Al - A10, prepared by Wes
Surdyka Architect Inc., dated April 12, 2002, date received April 30, 2002.
• Fax Transmittal from Wes Surdyka Architect Inc., dated April 29, 2002, stating finished
basement and ground floor elevations.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposed works involve the construction of a 8.4 sq.m. one storey solarium addition within
the Regional Storm floodplain and within the Hogg's Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). The
proposed minor addition will be constructed onto the rear (north side) of the two- storey
residence which was constructed in 1998 as per approval permit, C -98012 issued by TRCA to
Mr. Zentil in accordance with our floodproofing requirements.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed addition will be floodproofed to the Regional Storm flood level and will maintain
existing grades.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from the proposed works since the construction site is located
more than 60 metres from the watercourse.
320
Conservation of Land:
. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works which are consistent
with existing development in the corridor reach. There are no geotechnical /slope stability
issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33166
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 1, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 166/02/TOR
8.1.50 REGION OF YORK
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 6, 7, & 8,
Concession 7, (Islington Avenue - Monsheen Drive to Thistlewood Avenue), in the
City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Region of York.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for sanitary sewer installation, watermain installation,
Islington Avenue widening and fill behind retaining wall) in a Fill Regulated Area and to
construct structures (81 metre long x 4 metre high retaining wall, Islington Avenue asphalt,
curb and gutters) within a Regional Storm Floodplain.
The permit will be issued for the period of June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Sheets 15, 16, 17, 60, 61, 64, 65, 66 - Islington Avenue; dated March 4, 2002; received
March 6, 2002; prepared by UMA Engineering Ltd.
• Silt Fence Detail; received March 6, 2002; prepared by UMA Engineering Ltd.
• Letter of Undertaking (for minor revisions to engineering drawings); dated June•5,
2002; received June 5, 2002; prepared by the Region of York.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
321
Proposal:
The proposal involves the widening of Islington Avenue from Monsheen Avenue in the south to
Thistlewood in the north. A subsequent Executive Committee Report will follow in July which
will involve the area north of Thistlewood and will include the Humber Bridge works and lands
northward to Langstaff. TRCA staff provided comments on the broader reach of the Islington
Avenue widening from Hwy 7 to Rutherford Road during the Environmental Assessment
process. This application involves the excavation and fill placement for a 900mm sanitary
sewer along the east side of Islington as well as the installation of a 200mm watermain. A 81
metre long x 4 metre high retaining wall will be constructed on the east side of Islington Avenue
opposite Woodbridge Avenue. This stretch of Islington Avenue from Monsheen to
Thistlewood is located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain of the
Humber River which is located on the west side of the road. A Property Report has been
prepared for the conveyance of lands for the right -of -way.
Control of Flooding:
There will be fill placement in the floodplain associated with the road widening and the
retaining wall. Fill placement associated with the roadwork will have a negligible impact on
flood levels and flood storage.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the
construction - generated sediments remain within the construction site.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be no in stream works associated with the project, therefore there will be no
concerns related to fish habitat loss.
The widening will impact no significant resource features. A portion of the works will be
conducted on lands presently owned by the TRCA and an archaeological investigation is
currently underway. When the clearance has been received from TRCA's archaeologist, staff
will be in a position to issue the "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33006
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For Information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: May 29, 2002
Application #: 101 /02/VAUG
RES. #B65/02 - APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
Carolyn Woodland, Jason Scott and Laurie Nelson. Appointment of
Enforcement Officers to administer Fill, Construction and Alteration to
Waterways Regulation (Ontario Regulation 158).
322
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
THAT Carolyn Woodland, Jason Scott and Laurie Nelson be appointed as Enforcement
Officers for the purpose of enforcing Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterway
Regulations (Ontario Regulation 158) made by The Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority, pursuant to Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Conservation Authorities Act provides for an Authority to appoint Enforcement Officers to
enforce its regulations. There are several Authority staff who currently have this designation,
both for the purpose of enforcing the Authority's regulation and for authorizing the issuance of
permits approved by the Executive Committee under the regulation.
RATIONALE
Ms. "Carolyn Woodland has recently been appointed as Manager, and Mr. Jason Scott and Ms.
Laurie Nelson have recently been appointed to the positions of Senior Planner within the
Development Services Section. In these positions, they have the responsibility for supervising
the Authority's regulation services associated with the review and approval of applications.
Their appointment as Enforcement Officers will enable them to authorize the issuance of
approva's for the work that they supervise and will allow them to assist with the enforcement of
the regulation as required.
Report prepared by: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214
For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214
Date: May 27, 2002
RES. #B66/02 - AWARD FOR TENDER ES02 -06
Purchase of Skidsteer and Backhoe Attachment. Award of Tender
ES02 -06 to Dan Greer Enterprises for the purchase of a skidsteer and
backhoe attachment.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
THAT Tender ES02 -06 be awarded to Dan Greer Enterprises for a skidsteer and backhoe
attachment for a total cost of $34,069.42 including all applicable taxes.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority's Policy and Procedures for the Purchase of Goods and Services of Equipment
requires the Executive Committee approval for the selection of the successful tender for
acquisitions between $25,000 and $100,000.
323
Analysis
In accordance with the Authority's policy, staff has examined the need for the replacement of
Authority owned equipment. The replacement acquisition of equipment is determined by
evaluating the requirements and operations of the location; condition of the existing equipment
including the mechanical fitness (cost/benefit of repairs ), age, hours used and available funds
in the Vehicle and Equipment budget. The Environmental Services Section has used an
Authority owned skidsteer machine since 1990. This type of equipment has proven to be very
beneficial and versatile in association with the other heavy equipment used at the job sites.
Due to the machine being twelve years old and becoming unreliable with lost time due to
repairs, it has been determined that a replacement unit be purchased. It was also
recommended that in lieu of renting a backhoe attachment, one should be purchased.
Tenders were received from a total of nine invited bidders for the supply and delivery of a new
skidsteer with cab and heater and backhoe attachment equivalent to a Case 60XT model. The
following is a summary of bids opened at the Tender Opening Sub - Committee on February
22, 2002:
SUPPLIER
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL COST (excl.
GST)
Dan Greer Enterprises
Thomas T175 skidsteer c/w
Thomas BH108 backhoe
attachment
$34,069.42
Mathews Equipment Ltd.
Bobcat 773Turbo skidsteer &
Bobcat 709 backhoe attachment
$36,420.04
Mathews Equipment Ltd.
Bobcat 863 skidsteer &
Bobcat 709 backhoe attachment
$41,630.46
Nobelton Farm Supply
John Deere 250 skidsteer &
John Deere Pro 850 backhoe
attachment
$40,779.00
Hutchinson Farm Supply
John Deere 250 skidsteer &
John Deere Pro 850 backhoe
attachment
$41,152.75
Strongco Equipment
Case 60XT skidsteer &
Case D125 backhoe attachment
$41,970.40
West Metro Equipment Sales
New Holland LS180 skidsteer &
New Holland /Bradco backhoe
attachment
$44,102.50
Stewart's New Holland
New Holland LS108 skidsteer &
Bush Hog 865H backhoe
attachment
$50,370.00
Battlefield Equipment
Caterpillar236 skidsteer &
Bradco 408 backhoe attachment
$53,933.17
Battlefield Equipment
Caterpillar 246 skidsteer &
Bradco 408 backhoe attachment
$57,887.07
324
RATIONALE
Staff reviewed the bids submitted and summarized specifications for each skidsteer which
included horsepower, lifting capacity and breakout forces. The models were then compared to
the Equipment Manufacturer's Institute Size classification system, which classifies skidsteers
based on lifting capacity, to ensure that similar models were being compared. In addition to
the above review a number of models were also field tested by staff. Based on the
aforementioned reviews staff recommend the Thomas T175 skidsteer with backhoe
attachment.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this equipment purchase is available from account 701 -11 -405.
Report prepared by: Garry Misumi, extension 5293 and Mark Preston, 416 -392 -9720
For Information contact: Garry Misumi, extension 5293
Date: May 07, 2002
RES. #B67/02 - 2002 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Award of a contract for the Laboratory Analytical Services for the 2002
field program.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
THAT AMEC Earth & Environmental Laboratories be awarded the contract for Item A and
Item B as outlined In the 2002 Laboratory Analytical Services ES02 -04 contract document
for the amount of $ 49,825 (excluding GST).
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Environmental Services Section will require laboratory analytical services in support of
three major programs which are outlined as follows:
1. Since 1975, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has conducted
environmental monitoring programs to describe biological, physical and chemical
conditions in the, vicinity of waterfront parks. Special studies have been conducted to
examine the sediment quality, water quality, sediment deposition rates, bottom substrate
documentation, biomonitoring surveys using fresh clams and currents associated with the
waterfront parks.
2. Laboratory testing of soil samples is required to audit the effectiveness of the Lakefill
Quality Control Program (LQCP). Random soil sampling at all active lakefill sites along the
waterfront is a key component of the LQCP. The total soil sampling and testing
requirements is based on the volume of lakefill received throughout the year.
325
3. Soil and water analytical work will also be required in order to carry out site
assessments and site remediation work on various properties owned by the TRCA.
RATIONALE
The Tender Opening Sub - committee opened tenders for contract ES02 -04 for the 2002 laboratory
analytical services. The results of the tender opening are as follows:
Laboratory
Item A
Item B
Total
AMEC Earth & Environmental
$21,650.00
$28,175.00
$49,825.00
PSC Analytical Services
$22,340.00
$28,885.00
$51,225.00
Maxxam Analytics Inc.
$35,815.00
$28,045.00
$63,860.00
Staff reviewed the three quotations and there were no errors or omissions. It is recommended
that the lowest total cost quotation from AMEC Earth & Environmental be accepted for the 2002
laboratory analytical services.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds to implement the projects are available in accounts; 408 -76, 242 -01, 240 -01
Report prepared by: Dave Hatton, 416 - 392 -3725
For Information contact: Dave Hatton, 416 -392 -3725
Date: May 27, 2002
RES. #868/02 - WASHROOM RENOVATIONS, CLAREMONT FIELD CENTRE
Award of Contract. Award of contract to complete boys and girls
dormitory washroom renovations at the Claremont Field Centre.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
THAT Web Construction, A Division of 1275802 Ontario Ltd., be awarded the contract to
complete boys and girls dormitory washroom renovations at the Claremont Field Centre
in accordance with their quote dated March 13, 2002 and costed at $32,480.00 plus GST;
AND FURTHER THAT all work be scheduled and completed during the weeks of July 6 to
July 20, 2002 and /or August 15 to August 31, 2002 such that the washroom facilities are
fully available for use by a Claremont client group during July 24 - August 14, 2002.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Approximately $160,00 is available each year for capital improvements to Conservation Areas
and Field Centres. The dormitory washroom renovations at the Claremont Field Centre were
identified as a priority for capital work improvements in 2002 as detailed in a Capital
326
Improvements Report presented to the Authority in 2001.RATIONALE
The work is being scheduled when there are no clients using the facility. As a result, the
washroom renovations can only be undertaken during the weeks of July 6 to July 20 and
August 15 to August 31. This schedule was communicated to the companies that provided
quotes.
Four quotes were received for the Claremont Field Centre dormitory washroom renovations:
Company
Quote
Benvenuto Bros. Maintenance Company
$37,400.00 + GST
M.F.O. Repairs & Renovations Ltd.
$42,000.00 + GST
Web Construction
A Division of 1275802 Ontario Ltd.
$32,480.00 + GST
CANDO Renovations Inc.
•
1
$21,00.00 (error) + GST *incomplete bid
CANDO Renovations Inc. did not provide a complete quote and appeared to make an error in
their cost. When asked to clarify and complete the bid, they advised that they were not able to
complete the work within the specified timeframe and took no further action.
Web Construction, a Division of 1275802 Ontario Ltd., has provided a complete quote and is
the most economical proposal. The company has confirmed that they can complete the work
within the specified timeframe.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Each dormitory washroom will be gutted and all fixtures (toilet, sink, counter tops, lights, etc)
replaced. All ceiling, walls and flooring(except shower floors) will be repaired and replaced.
Washrooms will be painted and hand dryers installed.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding is available in 2002 through the TRCA Capital Development budget.
Report prepared by: Renee Jarrett, extension 5315
For Information contact: Renee Jarrett, extension 5315
Date: May 28, 2002
RES. #869/02 - WEST DUFFINS, WHITEVALE, GANATSEKIAGON, URFE,
CENTREVILLE AND ETOBICOKE CREEKS FLUVIAL
GEOMORPHOLOGY STUDY
To retain a consultant to complete a fluvial geomorphology study for
West Duffins, Whitevale, Ganatsekiagon, Urfe, Centreville and Etoblcoke
Creeks within the Duffins Creek, Humber River and Etobicoke Creek
watersheds.
327
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
THAT the consulting firm of Parish Geomorphic be retained for $26,297 for a fluvial
geomorphology study for West Duffins, Whitevale, Ganatsekiagon, Urfe, Centreville and
Etobicoke Creeks within the Duffins Creek, Humber River and Etobicoke Creek
watersheds.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
This project involves examining the fluvial geomorphology on a subwatershed basis and to
establish a baseline erosion monitoring program using historic and recent aerial photographs,
digital elevation models, synoptic surveys, and rapid and detailed geomorphic assessments.
The information collected will be used to characterize and classify the streams within the
subwatersheds to determine condition controlling factors and sensitivity to change. The results
of this work will then be used (at a later date) to complete analyses of instream erosion
potential which will ultimately direct management of impacts from both existing and future land
uses.
RATIONALE
Three consultant groups were invited to submit proposals based upon the Terms of Reference
for this project including: Aquafor Beech Ltd., Parish Geomorphic, and Planning & Engineering
Initiatives Ltd. An upset limit of $28,400 (including G.S.T.) was established.
Aquafor Beech Ltd. $28,314
Parish Geomorphic $26,697
Planning & Engineering Initiatives Ltd $27,500
*All prices include G.S.T.
A committee of three TRCA staff has unanimously selected Parish Geomorphic. This selection
was based upon the consultant's submission of a fee proposal for consulting services which
best satisfied the set of written selection criteria as developed by TRCA in advance of the
selection process. The criteria included the requirement to have previous experience in the
area of fluvial geomorphology, and familiarity with the approaches. The successful proposal
offered the best approach to the work and the consultant had the most experience within the
study reaches. Staff are confident that Parish Geomorphic will conduct the required tasks in a
timely and efficient manner.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available to complete this project through the Greater Toronto Airport Authority,
Region of Peel and Region of Durham.
328
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The work involves the completion of a fluvial Geomorphology study for West Duffins, Whitevale,
Ganatsekiagon, Urfe, Centreville and Etobico<e Creeks, within the municipalities of Brampton,
Mississauga, Caledon and Pickering.
Report prepared by: Marilee Gadzovski, extension 5362
For Information contact: Marilee Gadzovski, extension 5362
Date: May 27, 2002
RES: #B70 /02 - EARTH RANGERS - CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION
Authorization for start of construction; Earth Rangers Centre at Kortright.
Movedty:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
THAT Earth Rangers be given permission to commence construction of the new Centre at
Kortright as soon as a building permit and any other necessary approvals are obtained.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Public Use Advisory Board will be dealing with a report on June 7 concerning the final
clearance of lease conditions for the Earth Rangers Centre at Kortright. The recommendations
of the Public Use Board will not be considered by the Authority until June 21. Earth Rangers
are anxious to start construction as soon as possible and if a building permit is obtained before
June 21 they would like to commence construction. As we are at the conclusion of a
successful negotiation period for a very exciting joint venture, staff feel that any comments by
the full Authority concerning the final design of the facility can be dealt with during construction
and that it is appropriate for the Executive Committee to authorize an immediate start to
construction if all other approvals are in hand.
Report prepared by: Brian Denney, 416 -667 -6290
For-Information contact: Brian Denney, 416 - 667 -6290
Date: May 30, 2002
RES. #B71 /02 - TRCA REGIONAL WATERSHED MONITORING
Award of contract for the establishment of fluvial geomorphology
sampling stations in support of the TRCA's Regional Watershed
Monitoring Program
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
329
THAT the firm of Parish Geomorphic be retained to undertake fluvial morphology surveys
and data collection at sites identified for 2002 In the Regional Watershed Monitoring
Program, for a total cost not to exceed $47,567.00.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
There is limited information available on aquatic habitats in the watersheds within the GTA
Region and at the present time there are no on -going programs to monitor changes in aquatic
habitat. Information on physical habitat is needed at fixed sites within each watershed in order
to understand the normal variation that occurs in these habitats and the associated changes in
the fish and benthic invertebrate community. The data is also needed to identify any long term
trends in habitat that might affect stream health and productive capacity. Therefore, it has
been recommended that a long -term monitoring program be established in partnership with
interested agencies and organizations to track changes in physical habitat at the sites where
fish and benthic invertebrate communities are surveyed.
The physical component of aquatic habitat in a stream is closely related to the fluvial
geomorphology. Studies of fluvial geomorphology are important components of works in and
around watercourses and are often undertaken in association with these works. However,
there are few on -going monitoring activities associated with tracking changes in fluvial
geomorphology, spatially and temporally. The importance of fluvial geomorphology in
understanding the association between flow in a stream and the aquatic habitat present cannot
be over stated. For this reason, it has been recommended that several aspects of fluvial
geomorphological assessments (e.g. long profiles, cross sections, pebble counts, bank full
width and depth, etc.) be incorporated into the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program that
has been developed and is currently being implemented by the TRCA.
In this respect, fluvial geomorphology surveys have been proposed at a total of 150 stations
across the nine watersheds within the TRCA's jurisdiction have been suggested as part of the
Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. In 2001, a total of 50 of these stations were selected
and surveyed using standard fluvial geomorphology measurement techniques. These include
stations within the Humber, Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watersheds.
For the 2002 field season, an additional 50 stations will be selected from the Don and Highland
and Rouge watersheds, and surveyed in a similar capacity. The expectation is that all of the
150 sites identified throughout the regions nine watersheds can be set -up and surveyed within
a 3 year period.
The successful candidate for this project is expected to provide services for the set -up and
completion of these surveys at a total of 50 sites within the GTA along with the provision of
detailed data summaries and analysis for each site. A station selection process is currently
underway in order to select the 50 sites.
RATIONALE
At the present time there are a limited number of consulting firms that provide detailed fluvial
geomorphology assessment services. In this respect, a terms of reference was prepared and
submitted to three firms that the Authority has worked with and utilized in the past. These
were: Parish Geomorphic, Aquafor Beech and Planning and Engineering Initiatives Ltd.
330
Proposals were received from all three of the firms approached,-with bids provided as follows:
Planning and Engineering Initiatives
Parish Geomorphic
Aquafor Beech Ltd.
$42,500.00 (including GST)
$47,567.00 (including GST)
$48,381.72 (including GST)
Staff have reviewed all of the proposals and have determined that each of the firms
approached are considered capable of providing the services required. It was determined,
however, that although Parish Geomorphic was not the lowest bidder, this firm was best able
to address the Authority's needs. Parish Geomorphic has had direct experience in setting up
the fluvial geomorphic monitoring stations specific to the Regional Watershed Monitoring
Program and the provision of data in the geomorphic database set -up as part of the TRCA
relational database structure. In addition, it was determined that there would be value to the
Authority in maintaining consistency in the set -up of geofluvial monitoring stations within the
Regional Watershed Monitoring Program.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Upon awarding of the contract, the successful firm will initiate the detailed historical review of
the proposed sites and conduct the field survey and data collection activities between July and
the end of October. A report and data summary is to be made available to Authority staff by
October 31, 2002.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this work has been identified within the 2002 Regional Watershed Monitoring
Program (124 -05). Within this program a total of 150 sites have been proposed for deta led
fluvial geomorphology surveys over a three year period. This work represents one third of the
overall survey work to be completed.
For Information contact: Scott Jarvie, extension 5312
Date: May 30, 2002
RES. #B72/02 - COMPREHENSIVE ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT OF TRCA WATER
WORKS
Award of Contract. Award of consulting services for a Comprehensive
Engineering Assessment of TRCA Water Works
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
331
THAT the firm of Gamsby and Mannerow Limited be retained to undertake the
Comprehensive Engineering Assessment of TRCA Water Works study; the total cost of
the engineering component not to exceed $26,000 (excluding GST) and, at additional cost
laboratory analysis as required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Province of Ontario through the Ontario Water Resources Act has introduced new
regulations and standards to ensure clean, safe water at the tap. Drinking Water Protection
Regulation (Ont. Reg. 459/00) and Drinking Water Protection Regulation for Smaller
Waterworks Servicing Designated Facilities (Ont. Reg. 505/01) adopted by the Province applies
to municipal and private water works facilities varying in size and capacity. Regulation 903
stipulates the requirements for well construction, maintenance and abandonment and is
currently being reviewed and is expected to become more stringent.
Ontario Reg. 459/00 applies to waterworks that:
• serve six or more residences; or
• supply more than 50,000 litres of water daily on any day and have the capacity to supply
250,000 or more litres of water per day
Ontario Reg. 505/01 to smaller designated facilities such as schools, day nurseries, nursing
and retirement homes and other facilities in the broader public sector and private sector that
have their own water supply system and do not fall under Reg. 459/00.
Following is a list of Authority operated facilities that are on private servicing:
• Albion Hills Conservation Park, Educational Field Centre, dairy farm and two
residential residences
• Boyd Field Centre (TRCA offices) and one residential residence
• Cold Creek Property (rental property)
• Kortright Conservation Area (Centre for Sustainable Living) and two residential
residences
• Glen Haffy Conservation Park, all locations including the workshop
• Claremont Field Centre
• Bruce's Mill Conservation Park and one residential residence
As a result the Authority is proposing to carry out a study the purpose of which is to carry out a
comprehensive assessment of TRCA water work facilities and to ensure all wells, treatment and
distribution systems comply with Regulations 505/01, 459/00 and 903/ under the Ontario Water
Regulations Act and to make a set of recommendations on compliance of TRCA to these
regulations. Regulation 505/01 stipulates that schools must have their water systems in
compliance by September 1, 2002, and it is the objective of the Authority to be in compliance
where schools or school groups use TRCA facilities by that date.
RATIONALE
Requests for proposals were sent to six firms and proposals were received as follows:
332
Marshall Macklin Monaghan
(excluding GST)
Gartner Lee Limited
(excluding GST)
Stantec Consulting Limited
(excluding GST)
Gamsby and Mannerow Limited
(excluding GST)
Envirochex Associates Inc.
(excluding GST)
SNC Lavalin
(excluding GST)
Engineering Costs $42,408
Lab Costs $15,146
Engineering Costs $43,226
Lab Costs $4,900
Engineering Costs $24,869
Lab Costs $12,000
Engineering Costs $26,000
Lab Costs $17,550
Engineering Costs $39,930
Lab Costs no estimate
No Proposal Received
Total $57,544
Total $48,126
Total $36,869
Total $43,550
Total $39,930
Staff has reviewed all proposals received and recommends that Gamsby and Mannerow
Limited be retained to carry out a Comprehensive Engineering Assessment of TRCA Water
Works. Although not the lowest cost received, overall, the proposal from the firm of Gamsby
and Mannerow Limited demonstrated a superior knowledge of our facilities, addressed most
effectively the compliance and timing issues related to our education centers and
demonstrated experience in this area.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Costs of the project are available in the 2002 budget.
Report prepared by: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Jim Dlllane, extension 6292
Date: June 3, 2002
RES.#B73/02 - HYDROGEOLOGICAL SERVICES
Renewal of hydrogeological services contract.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
THAT Dr. Rick Gerber's contract with the Authority be renewed until December 31, 2002
at an upset limit of $60,000 including GST to complete the hydrogeological component of
the Duffins and Carruthers Creek Groundwater Management and Source Protection Plan
and contribute hydrogeological advice to Authority staff on related initiatives.
CARRIED
333
BACKGROUND
At Meeting #4/01, held June 8, 2001, the Executive Committee approved the hire of Dr. Rick
Gerber at an upset limit of $35,000 to conduct the hydrogeological component of the Duffins
and Carruthers Creek watershed management strategy and contribute hydrogeological advice
to Authority staff on other related initiatives (RES. #B58/01). Dr. Gerber has completed the
expected deliverables associated with this work, which included:
• set up and calibration of a 3D groundwater flow model for the two watersheds
• evaluation of the groundwater response associated with three alternative land use
scenarios
• technical input to the surface water budget
• representation of Authority interests in the York /Peel /Durham Groundwater Program
• preparation of terms of reference and consultant selection for the TRCA watersheds
groundwater modelling study
• representation of Authority interests in the Tri- Region Oak Ridges Moraine Strategy
• preparation of a technical manual for TRCA groundwater modelling
• advice to TRCA and MOE regarding the TRCA groundwater monitoring network design
A renewal of Dr. Gerber's contract is necessary to complete the following deliverables:
• final reporting on the groundwater modelling for the Duffins and Carruthers Creek
watershed strategy studies
• development of a Duffins and Carruthers Creek groundwater management and source
protection plan
• supervision of consultants responsible for the TRCA watersheds groundwater modelling
study
• representation of Authority interests in the York/Peel /Durham Groundwater Program
studies
• provision of technical advice to Authority staff on other related initiatives.
RATIONALE
For the past ten years Dr. Rick Gerber has been researching groundwater flow systems in the
Toronto Region, and he is a recognized expert in the field of hydrogeology. His knowledge
could not be matched by other private sector consultants. It was on this basis that the
Authority retained Dr. Gerber's services in 2001, and we have an interest in renewing his
contract to the end of 2002 in order to complete a number of initiatives.
Dr. Gerber has offered the TRCA an exceptional rate for his services: a retainer fee of
$5000 /month for the first 100 hours of his time. Any requirements for additional time would be
billed at his 2001 rate of $100 /hour. The Authority's requirements should be able to be fulfilled
largely within 100 hours /month.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding is available in Durham and Peel Capital Budget Accounts 122 -41 and 122 -21.
Report prepared by: Sonya Meek, extension 5253
For Information contact: Sonya Meek, extension 5253
Date: June 05, 2002
334
RES. #B74/02 - 2002 VEHICLE ACQUISITIONS
Purchase of the Honda Hybrid Civic Car
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Lorna Bissell
THAT staff be directed to purchase a Honda Hybrid Civic Car from Dalts Honda for the .
amount of $31,706.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority's policy and procedures for the purchase of goods and services and equipment
require the Executive Committee approval for acquisitions between $25,000 and $100,000.
RATIONALE
The acquisition of replacement and disposal of vehicles and equipment is included in the 2002
budget. The Authority is developing a protocol to replace vehicles which have reached the end
of their life cycle with units with the most fuel efficient and lowest exhaust emission available
that meet the needs of the program. The Honda Civic Hybrid is a high efficiency four door
sedan which'utilizes Honda's Integrated Motor Assist technology. The Integrated Motor Assist
uses a gasoline engine coupled to an electric motor. The Honda Civic will replace an existing
vehicle in the Head Office pool and will be driven by staff to meetings and site visits. Honda
has recently introduced the vehicle to the market place by selling the vehicle at a loss through
its dealer network. Dalts Honda has a vehicle available which has the Authority's standard
white colour. Dalts Honda is only charging the Authority above their cost, a small
administration fee and the Honda standard freight and pre - delivery charges. Dalts Honda is a
reputable dealer with facilities to service Civic Hybrid vehicles. Based on the above, staff do not
think it is cost and time effective to tender out this vehicle. Staff investigated the Toyota Prius,
which is a similar hybrid vehicle, however the Honda Hybrid Civic is the least expensive option.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the acquisition of the vehicle are available from account code 701 - 11-404
Report prepared by: Jim Tucker, extension 5247
For Information contact: Jim Tucker, extension 5247
Date: June 04, 2002
335
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:35 a.m., on June 7, 2002.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
ts.
THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #6/02
. July 5, 2002
The Executive Committee Meeting #6/02, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office, on
Friday, July 5, 2002. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:37 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Member
Lorna Bissell Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Ron Moeser Member
Dick O'Brien Chair
REGRETS
Michael Di Biase Member
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
RES.#B75/02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Irene Jones
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #5/02, held on June 7, 2002, be approved.
CARRIED
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #B76 /02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Don River Watershed
William N. Roome, CFN 32806. Purchase of property, located south of
Sheppard Avenue, east of Bathurst Street, City of Toronto, (North
Community), under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and
Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and Conservation
Component - Don River Watershed."
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Irene Jones
337
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.43 hectares (1.066 acres), more or
Tess, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of vacant land, be purchased from William
N. Roome, said land being Lot 159, and Part of Lot 158, Registered Plan 2456, City of
Toronto, (North Community), located south of Sheppard Avenue, east of Bathurst Street;
THAT consideration is to be sum of $47,000.00, plus vendor's reasonable legal costs;
THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owners.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division and City officials have reviewed the
proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase' of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition for the
Don River, and is within the Earl Bales Woods Environmentally Significant Area (No. 66).
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The parcel being acquired will be turned over to the City of Toronto under the terms of the
existing management agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to account 004 -11 -502. Funding is available in
TRCA's Capital Budget.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: June 24, 2002
Attachments: 1
338
Attachment 1
t t RE:
NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Don River Watershed
William N. Roome
CFN 32806
it
wepawfro
TRCAL/WDS
SUBJECT PROPERTY
339
RES. #B77/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed
Joseph and Brenda Horan, CFN 32763. Acquisition of a conservation
easement, located on the north side of Mill Lane, east of The Gore Road,
Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel under the "Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001- 2005 ", floodplain
and conservation component, Humber River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the
protection of the environmental features and functions containing approximately 0.243
hectares (0.600 acres), of land be purchased from Joseph and Brenda Horan, said land
being Part of the West Half of Lot 22, Concession 4, Town of Caledon, Regional
Municipality of Peel, designated as Part 6 on Plan 43R- 27165, located on the north side of
Mill Lane, east of The Gore Road;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, TRCA Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage
Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005.
As a condition of approval of a severance of a lot by the Land Division Committee for Peel
Region, Joseph and Brenda Horan are required to convey to TRCA a conservation easement
for the protection of a tributary stream and valley corridor associated with the West Humber
River, which also contains a coldwater fisheries stream.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls,within TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition. The acquisition
of a conservation easement will provide long term protection for the stream corridor feature.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The lands subject to this easement will remain in private ownership; as such, the owner will
continue to be responsible for taxes and maintenance.
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: June 25, 2002
Attachments: 1
340
Attachment 1
•
_:..-7-
. ---:.
'- -
1 • , A -:: ." w . .
RE: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION :
PROJECT, 2001-2005 le/ / /Ai TRCA LANDS
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed 4'; SUBJECT PROPERTY 2
Joseph and Brenda Horan
onservatibn
_ LAN
341
RES. #878/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed
The Jefferson Forest Development Corporation, CFN 33279. Acquisition
of a conservation easement, located east of Yonge Street, north of 19th
Avenue, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York under the
"Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ",
floodplain and conservation component, Rouge River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the
protection of the environmental features and functions containing approximately 0.166
hectares (0.410 acres), of land be purchased from The Jefferson Forest Development
Corporation, said land being Part of Lot 56, Concession 1, East of Yonge Street, Town of
Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, designated as Parts 1 -19 inclusive on a
draft plan of survey prepared by Schaeffer & Dzaldov Limited under their Job No.
00- 252 -06 -2, located east of Yonge Street, north of 19th Avenue;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses Incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, TRCA Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage
Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005.
As a condition of the draft plan of subdivision the owner is required to grant a conservation
easement over the rear 5 metres of 19 lots in the subdivision for the preservation of the tree
root zone of the adjacent wooded areas and hedgerows.
Negotiations have been conducted with Mr. Robert Judges representative of The Jefferson
Forest Development Corporation.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the taking of this conservation easement.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition.
342
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The lands subject to this easement will remain in private ownership; as such, the owner will
continue to be responsible for taxes and maintenance.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: June 21, 2002
Attachments: 1
343
Attachment 1
RE:
NATURAL. HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed
The Jefferson Forest Development Corporation
CFN 33279
•
•
344
250
'Woomera fLoor2
I ITRCALANDS
SUBJECT PROPER,
rn.±t[ Iae,,.
.'j .
a
Sl 9rECT
' 1ROipta,
s
TM AVE
11,'
�; ✓�(
far � l/
■ {'
ith -t �r y
t
•
•
344
250
'Woomera fLoor2
I ITRCALANDS
SUBJECT PROPER,
RES. #B79/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Humber River Watershed
Estate of Olive Bennett, CFN 33262. Olive Bennett provided to the
Conservation Foundation of Greater in her Will, the opportunity accept
title to her property located at 10780 Pine Valley Drive, Vaughan.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 4 hectares (10 acres), more or less,
consisting of a rectangular shaped parcel of land together with a bungalow, be acquired
from the Estate of Olive Bennett through the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto
said land being Part of Lot 26, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of
York, located at 10780 Pine Valley Drive;
THAT consideration is to be the payment of the outstanding mortgage against the
property together with all outstanding debts against the estate (The total of these costs is
estimated at $110,000);
THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Olive Bennett passed away on March 13, 2002. in her Will she gave the Conservation
Foundation 90 days to advise whether it would accept title to her home locate at 10780 Pine
Valley Drive, City of Vaughan and containing 10 acres, more or Tess. The Will also indicated
that the Conservation Foundation would have to assume the liability of the mortgage
outstanding against the property which is presently $55,000. The Conservation Foundation
cannot sell the property and must use it to further its efforts regarding protection, regeneration
and management of natural green spaces, watersheds, forests, wildlife habitats, public access
conservation areas and historic sites.
If the Conservation Foundation is not interested in acquiring the property, the Federation of
Ontario Naturalists will have the next opportunity to acquire the property. If the Federation is
not interested in the property then it will be sold with the net proceeds going to the Federation.
345
Since the property at 10780 Pine Valley Drive was Olive Bennett's only asset, all outstanding
debits against her estate will have to be paid prior to assuming title to the property. Based on
the information we have received from Robert H. Blackburn , Q. C. of Strong Blackburn
Machon Bohm representing the Estate Trustees this amount will be approximately $45,000 to
$55,000. This will bring the total amount to be paid to approximately $100,000 to $110,000.
Because the Conservation Foundation can not hold title to property, it is necessary in cases of
bequests to the Conservation Foundation that TRCA take title to the property and manage it on
behalf of the Conservation Foundation.
At meeting #2/02 the Conservation Foundation Board of Directors adopted the following
resolution:
THAT the Trustees for the Estate of Olive Bennett be advised that the Conservation
Foundation of Grater Toronto will accept Olive Bennett's home at 10780 Pine Valley Drive for
its purposes subject to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) agreeing to
accept title and manage the property;
THAT TRCA be requested to accept title and manage the property for the Conservation
Foundation in accordance with the wishes of Olive Bennett;
AND FURTHER THAT TRCA be advised that the Conservation Foundation will assist in
raising approximately $110,000 required to accept this property.
The payment of $100,000 to $110,000 represents approximately 1/3 of the market value of the
property.
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition for the
Humber River.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
It is estimated that the taxes will be approximately $4,500 in 2002.
The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact TRCA's maintenance
costs at this location.
346
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502. The Conservation
Foundation of Greater Toronto has indicated that they will assist in fund raising for this
property. Also, there may be interest among the abutting land owners and the nearby
residents to help secure the funds.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: June 26, 2002
Attachments: 1
347
Attachment 1
RE:
ESTATE OF OLIVE BENNET7
10780 Pine Valley Drive, Vaughan
PON
•
onserva f on
TORONTO ANO R V1ON
MGM
348
TRCA LANDS
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Rif
RES. #B80/02 - CITY OF TORONTO
Conveyance of Land for the Don Valley Parkway located south of
Eglinton Avenue, City of Toronto (Downtown Community)
Don River Watershed, CFN 33224. Receipt of a request from the City of
Toronto for conveyance of land for the Don Valley Parkway located south
of Eglinton Avenue , City of Toronto (Downtown Community).
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to
convey certain lands for the Don Valley Parkway located south of Eglinton Avenue, City
of Toronto (Downtown Community);
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of the TRCA In
-furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to
cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance;
THAT a parcel of TRCA land containing 0.648 hectares, more or less, (1.602 acres) be
conveyed to the City of Toronto for the Don Valley Parkway located south of Eglinton
Avenue, said land being Part of Lot 7, Concession 3, From the Bay, City of Toronto,
(Downtown Community), designated as Part 2 on a plan of survey prepared by the City of
Toronto, Works & Emergency Services Department under their Job Number 2002 -0091;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other
costs;
THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify and save harmless TRCA from any and all
claims for Injuries, damages or loss of any nature resulting in any way either directly or
Indirectly from this sale;
THAT said conveyance is subject to the approval, if required, of the Minister of Natural
Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O.
1990, Chapter C.27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
As part of the Port Union Waterfront Regeneration Project, TRCA acquired lands from the
Canadian _National Railway Company (CNR) to undertake the construction. CNR agreed to
convey to TRCA the lands required for the Project subject to TRCA accepting other surplus
CNR lands in the Don Valley. The Don Valley Parkway crossed one of the surplus parcels in
the Don Valley. It was CNR's preference that they convey all their surplus lands to TRCA and
then TRCA would deal with the conveyance to the City.
349
It is our understanding that the reason these lands were owned by CNR is because they were
required for railway purposes and CNR would only provide the then Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto with a crossing agreement to allow for construction of the Parkway. The
City will still maintain a crossing agreement for that portion of the Parkway that crosses the
railway immediately south of this parcel.
The City of Toronto has conveyed lands to the Authority over the years for nominal
consideration of $2.00 and has requested that these lands be conveyed for the nominal
consideration of $2.00. A plan illustrating bthe subject land is attached.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The City of Toronto will assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this
transaction.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: May 16, 2002
Attachments: 1
350
Attachment 1
.tQRTH 14) LC EASEMENT
RE: CITY OF TORONTO
Conveyance at Land for the Don Valley Parkway located south of
t glinton Avenue, City of Toronto (Downtown Community)
Don River Watershed
CFN 33224
l
.,r4
N err
111 t■, -`�-:
, tiRMA.‘i'A--...,-0,,
gitarst
ti.
°'af
MRS 'MCA LANDS
BURJECTPROPERTY
•
351
•
RES. #881/02 - YORK CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Request for release of any and all interest of the Authority in a small
portion of land located on the northeast corner of Islington Avenue and
Rutherford Road, City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed, CFN
22925. The Authority is in receipt of a request from the York Catholic
District School Board, the owner of the property located on the northeast
corner of Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road, in the City of Vaughan,
for the Authority to release any and all interest in a small fragment of land
to allow its sale to The Regional Municipality of York for the widening of
Rutherford Road.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Irene Jones
WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Is in receipt of a request from
the York Catholic District School Board to release any and all interest in land located on
the northeast corner of Rutherford Road, east of Islington Avenue, in the City of Vaughan,
Regional Municipality of York;
AND WHEREAS It is the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best Interest of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to co- operate with the York Catholic District School Board in this
Instance;
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Authority release any and all
interest in a small parcel of land containing 0.195 acres (0.079 hectares), more or less, to
the York Catholic District School Board, said land being Part Lot 16, Concession 7,
further being described as Part 5 on Reference Plan 65R- 24598, City of Vaughan,
Regional Municipality of York;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, with the York Catholic District
School Board being responsible for all legal and other costs involving the release of
interest In the land;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The subject land is part of a much larger parcel of land that was acquired by the Authority on
January 9, 1968 from R. H. Barker, under the Boyd Dam and Reservoir Project.
At Meeting #9/90 held on January 19, 1990, under Resolution #290/90, the Authority approved
the sale of 15.049 acres of the former Barker property, which was surplus to the requirements
of the Authority, to the York Region Roman Catholic Separate School Board. This sale was
completed on July 30, 1991.
352
As a condition of sale, the Authority imposed certain restrictive covenants on title. During the
period from July 19, 1991 to July 18, 2011 inclusive, if the whole or any part of the property
ceases to be used for a school, the School Board shall not sell or otherwise dispose of or
agree to sell or otherwise dispose of the property or any part thereof without first giving the
Authority the right to repurchase the property or such part thereof for a predetermined
purchase price.
The Regional Municipality of York has approached the York Region Roman Catholic Separate
School Board for conveyance of a strip of land for the widening of Rutherford Road. It is
necessary for the Authority to release the School Board from the restrictive covenant on this
parcel so that the School Board can convey the lands to the Region for the widening of
Rutherford Road. The restrictive covenant will remain on the balance of the lands the York
Region Roman Catholic Separate School Board purchased from the Authority in July 30, 1991.
A plan illustrating this location is attached.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The School Board will pay all legal and other costs associated with this transaction.
Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Date: June 25, 2002
Attachments:1
353
Attachment 1
//'l / /l/r////)6411/4,1///////////////1/X//
YORK CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
ra • Request for release of Authority's any and all interest in a small portion of
„� the lands currently owned by the York Catholic District School Board, located
ll� t on the northeast comer of Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road,
E'�'-' City of Vaughan
�I4 Humber River Watershed
/.� CFN 22925
lr -el0 O
otovil‘sv;\ 40
�tl�l'I��JJ��
%r� �4fr441.41 - r
3**IftOYD COM'
-4, '44,47.14:4,41:4-#4:00e
die# —4We'
�y
.00 t�s • !s
14-
354
Xon serva allan
�4 'MCA LANDS
SUBJECT PROPERTY
RES. #B82/02 - CONTRACT ES00 -14 EXTENSION
Supply of Operated Heavy Construction Equipment and Dump Trucks..
Extension o- contract ES00 -14, Supply of Rental Rates for Operated
Heavy Construction Equipment and Dump Trucks, for a further one year
period.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Watershed Management
Division utilize, as required, the services of Sartor and Susin Limited for the supply of
operated heavy construction equipment and dump trucks during 2002/2003, construction
period.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority at their meeting on July 20, 2000 approved the award of contract ES00 -14, for the
"Supply of Rental Rates for Operated Heavy Construction Equipment and Dump Trucks ", to
Sartor & Susin Limited. The contract was in effect August 1, 2000 for a one year period.
In the preparation of the original tender documents, staff included a provision whereby the
successful bidder could request a one year extension to the contract at a specific maximum
percent increase or decrease to the unit prices bid.
Sartor & Susin Limited requested, in writing, a one year extension to their contract with an
increase of 5% percent in the unit rates.
The Authority at their meeting July 27, 2001 approved this one year extension. Several capital
projects which had been planned for implementation have been substantially delayed, due to
regulatory agency approvals. Therefore the volume of the work anticipated by our equipment
supplier has been greatly reduced.
Staff have reviewed this proposal with Sartor & Susin Limited and are recommending a one
year extension to their contract with a modest increase in the unit rates of 3 percent.
RATIONALE
The TRCA and Sartor & Susin Limited have worked together on numerous successful projects
over many years and through the tendering process, have consistently provided the lowest unit
rates with a broad spectrum of equipment and experienced operators.
Staff have reviewed the proposed new rates structure, in conjunction with a performance
review, and are satisfied that the requested three percent increase is indicative of overall
industry operating cost increases and are warranted.
Report prepared by: Jim Berry 416 - 392 -9721
Date: June 24, 2002
355
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES. #B83 /02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places; ,
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Irene Jones
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.1 - 8.1.19, and 8.1.28, with the exception of 8.1.3 - Michael Murphy & Rachelle
Laporte), which are listed below.
RES. #B84 /02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
8.1.3 - Michael Murphy & Rachelle Laporte
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Irene Jones
CARRIED
THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application
8.1.3 - Michael Murphy & Rachelle Laporte, which is listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF PICKERING
8.1.1 ENBRIDGE CONSUMERS GAS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, Concession 8, (Regional
Road 5), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the
property owned by Enbridge Consumers Gas.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the installation
of a gas main by directional drilling under 8 tributaries of Duffins Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
356
• Uxbridge- Beaverton Reinforcement Project, Drawing No. 40- 3941 -02, Key Plan, Page 5
of 15, Page 7 of 15, Page 8 of 15, and Page 9 of 15, prepared by Enbridge Consumers
Gas, dated May 29, 2002, date received June 12, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Duffins Creek in
conjunction with the installation of a gas main along the south side of Regional Road 5
between Brock Road and Sideline 6. The proposed works will be conducted by directional
drilling under 8 tributaries of Duffins Creek, some of which are intermittent watercourses, with
all work occurring within the Regional road allowance.
Control of Flooding:
Finished grades will match existing grades, therefore there will be no impact on the storage or
conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sediment control fences will be installed around the bore hole pits to ensure that no sediment
enters the watercourse during construction.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no instream works as the gas main will be installed through the use of directional
boring a minimum of 1.5 m. beneath the watercourse, with the bore hole pits situated a
minimum of 10 metres from the watercourse. The proposed works will be conducted within the
Regional road allowance and no removal of riparian vegetation is involved. All disturbed areas
will be revegetated following construction. There are no fisheries concerns or geotechnical
issues related to this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33286
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 14, 2002
Application #: 232/02/PICK
8.1.2 PICKERING NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION "A"
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on, (1675 Montgomery Park
Road), in the City of Pickering, Waterfront Watershed as located on the property
owned by Pickering Nuclear Generating Station "A ".
357
The purpose is to remove a build -up of sand, gravel and loose sediment that has accumulated
throughout the forebay and intake channel of Pickering Nuclear "A" by means of hydraulic
dredging.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Proposal to Remove Sediment Bulld -up from the Pickering A Forebay and Intake
Channel, prepared by P.H. Patrick and J.W. Kowalewski, Environmental Technologies
Department, Kinectrlcs (formerly Ontario Hydro Technologies), date received May 7,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
Since the shut down of Pickering Nuclear "A" in 1996, a steady build -up of sand, gravel and
loose sediment has accumulated throughout the forebay and intake channel. The Pickering
Nuclear Generating Station is intending to restart Pickering Station A this summer and there is
a concern that once the condenser cooling water flow is at full capacity, a large quantity of this
loose material could be sucked into the plant and potentially cause damage to the pumps,
screens and condensers. The proposal involves the removal of this sediment from both the
forebay and intake channel by means of hydraulic dredging, with the collected material
deposited by pump onto a barge and re- deposited back into Lake Ontario, approximately 1 km
from shore in about 10 to 15 m. of water.
Control of Flooding:
The storage capacity and conveyance of flood waters will not be affected by the proposed
works.
Pollution:
A study undertaken by Kinetrics has determined that the sediment material in the forebay and
intake channel are not contaminated with radionuclides or metals. Hydraulic dredging is
recommended over using a hoe or clam digger since it produces a more thorough cleaning,
with very little plume being released. The offshore disposal of dredged material is preferred
since it is more environmentally sensitive than shoreline disposal would could result in a plume
of silt moving along the shoreline near local beaches, resulting in a fisheries concern.
Conservation of Land:
The proposal involves the removal and disposal of dredged materials in Lake Ontario.
However; Authority staff, in consultation with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, has
determined that the proposed inwater works will not constitute a harmful alteration, disruption
or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and that there are no fisheries concerns with the project,
as proposed. Approval from the Coast Guard and MNR are required for the deposition of the
dredged material offshore.
358
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33179
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 8, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
Application #: 175/02/PICK
8.1.3 MICHAEL MURPHY & RACHELLE LAPORTE
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 543, Block M -76, Plan, (2675 Lakeshore
Boulevard West), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area),
Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by Michael Murphy &
Rachelle Laporte.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Lake
Ontario shoreline.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to Jul / 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Site Plan submitted by applicant, date received June 12, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the excavation and replacement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area
associated with the Lake Ontario shoreline to facilitate the construction of an inground pool on
the tableland portion of the residential rear yard.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located entirely above the Regulatory floodline associated with Lake
Ontario, therefore the storage and conveyance of floodwater will not be affected.
Pollution:
• A silt fence will be installed between the work site and the top of bank in order to prevent
sediment from entering the lake.
359
Conservation of Land:
The proposed pool will be located on the tableland portion of the rear yard, approximately 14
metres from the top of bank, and well outside of the hazardous lands associated with the Lake
Ontario shoreline. The proposed works will not impact any significant resource features and
are consistent with existing development along the shoreline. There are not geotechnical /slope
stability issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33115
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: April 22, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (HUMBER YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 151/02/TOR
8.1.4 DANIEL CARTHEW
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 293, Plan 4163, (124 Hadrian Drive), in
the City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council Area), Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Daniel Carthew.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in
order to facilitate the construction of a new 31 square meter addition to the north side of an
existing home, and a 15 square meter addition to the west (front) side of the existing home.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• RED -LINE REVISED Sediment Control Details, Site Plan, Front, Side and Rear
Elevations. Prepared by the applicant, dated April 26, 2002, received May 28, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a regulated area of the Humber River, in order to
facilitate the construction of a new 31 square meter addition to the north side of an existing
home and a new 15 square meter addition to the west (front) side. The additions will maintain
existing grades and will not extend beyond the rear wall of the existing residence.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Humber River, and as such, the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
360
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction process in
order to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed additions will not project beyond the rear wall of the existing house and will
maintain the existing 5 meter setback from the top of bank. The proposed works will not impact
on any significant resource features and there are no slope stability /geotechnical issues
associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with section 4.2.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33270
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 4, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO. (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 221/02/TOR
8.1.5 ARKADY FISHMAN
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 24, Plan 2069,
(70 Don River Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council
Area), Don River Watershed asiocated on the property owned by Arkady Fishman.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a new, three story addition to the rear of an existing single family
dwelling located partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• RED -LINE REVISED Sediment Control Details, Site Plan, Basement, First and Second
Level Plans, Front, Rear, Right and Left Elevations, prepared by Delta Design, dated
May 2002, received May 29, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
• Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order to
facilitate the construction of a three level addition to the rear of an existing single family
dwelling located partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
361
Control of Flooding:
The rear portion of the existing house and the proposed rear addition are located within the
Regional Storm Floodplain. The addition constitutes less than a 50% increase in size to the
existing residence and will be dry floodproofed to the 350 Year flood level and structurally
floodproofed to withstand the depths and velocities expected under the Regional Storm, as per
the requirements of the Authority's minor addition requirement.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during the construction process to prevent
sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed addition will be dry floodproofed to the 350 Year flood level, as is the existing
house. The rear wall of the new addition will be in alignment with the those of neighbouring
homes and all openings into the addition, such as windows and doorways, will maintain
elevations no lower than those in the existing structure. Therefore, the new addition will not
result in any increase flood risk. The proposed works are consistent with existing development
in the corriodor reach and will not impact any significant resource features. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33005
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: March 10, 2002
Application #: 100 /02/TOR
8.1.6 HINCKS - DELLCREST CENTRE
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on, (1645 Sheppard
Avenue West), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the
construction of additional parking spaces within the Regional Storm floodplain of Black Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Parking Facility Expansion, Plan No. S1, prepared by Trafalgar
Engineering Ltd., revision date May 27, 2002, date received June 13, 2002.
• Letter of February 4, 2002, signed by Jim Bradley, Director of Parks and Recreation,
North District, to Mr. David Michaels, Administrator Hincks- Dellcrest Centre, granting
approval for Hincks - Dellcrest Centre to carry out the parking project.
362
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the placement and removal of fill within a Fill Regulated Area and within
the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with Black Creek in order to facilitate the
construction of 21 asphalt covered parking spaces, located at grade, on both the east and
west side of the access road into Downsview Dells Park, being lands owned by the TRCA, but
managed by the City of Toronto. At present, a parking lot located directly behind (south of)
The Hincks - Dellcrest Centre provides parking for staff and clients of the Centre. In addition,
there is a small cut -out lane situated on the west side of the access road, opposite the parking
lot, which provides over -flow parking for 6 additional vehicles. Present parking requirements
exceed the existing capacity resulting in vehicles illegally parking beside the road. The
proposed works will create additional parking spaces and alleviate a road safety hazard by
providing a formalized expanded parking facility to address present needs.
Control of Flooding:
The existing roadway into the park and the proposed expanded at grade parking facility is
located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, but above the 100 Year flood level, outside of the
floodway. Therefore, the proposed works are not expected to impact the storage or
conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Erosion control measures will be installed and maintained to prevent sediment from entering .
Black Creek, which is located approximately 25 to 50 metres away.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed easterly parking_area, providing 10 parking spaces, is located on a grassed area
adjacent to the park roadway; while the westerly parking area will encompass the existing 6 lot
parallel parking area and expand this area westerly onto the grassed area to provide 11
parking spaces. The expanded at grade parking facilities will not involve any tree removal and
all disturbed areas will be restored. There are no significant resource features on the site, nor
are there any fisheries or geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.2.11 - New Resource -based Uses - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. The applicant has received
written approval from the City of Toronto to carry out the proposed works and has signed an
Agreement whereby all maintenance duties for the expanded parking area will be performed
by the Hincks- Dellcrest Centre.
CFN: 33316
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 20, 2002
363
Application #: 242/02/TOR '
8.1.7 IKE GROSMAN
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 10, Plan 2069, (45 Wentworth
Avenue), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Ike Grosman.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to
facilitate the installation of an inground swimming pool.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Site Plan, submitted by applicant, date received June 25, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to
facilitate the installation of an inground swimming pool.
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is not located within the Regional Storm fioodplain, therefore the proposed
works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from
entering the watercourse which is located approximately 80 metres away.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed pool will maintain a 3 to 4 metre setback from the top of bank of the valley slope
and is located behind the building setback line established by TRCA staff for slope stability
purposes. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach
and are not expected to impact on any significant resource features. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33323
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 24, 2002
364
Application #: 248/02/TOR
CITY OF VAUGHAN
8.1.8 CARMINE & STELLA COLAROCCHIO
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 128, Plan 65M -3066, (216 Fletcher Drive),
in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Carmine & Stella Colarocchio.
The purpose is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of the
Don River to facilitate the construction of a swimming pool on an existing residential lot.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Location Plan, prepared by applicant, dated received by the TRCA, June 5, 2002
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a swimming pool on an existing lot which has been recently
developed through a plan of subdivision. The setback to the rear lot line of the proposed pool
is 2m, however, the lot is adjacent to a stormwater management facility located within the Open
Space corridor, and further separated from the watercourse by a public trail system. As the
works are to be located over 80m from the watercourse, setbacks from the property line are
not a concern.
Control of Flooding:
The property is not located within the Regional Storm floodplain of the Don River, and
therefore, there is no impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
All excavated material is to be removed off -site and all disturbed areas are to be immediately
stabilized upon completion of construction. There are no anticipated impacts of sedimentat'on
within the Open Space corridor.
Conservation of Land:
No works are to be conducted within the Open Space corridor and no vegetation is proposed
for removal, and therefore, there are no impacts to the Open Space corridor.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is conformity to Section 4.2.2.E - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33292
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: June 14, 2002
365
Application #: 226 /02/VAUG
8.1.9 COSIMO CACCAMO
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Concession 8, (100 Dolores
Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Cosimo Caccamo.
The purpose is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of the
Humber River to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling on an existing lot of
record.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan (illustrating Grading, Sediment Control and Landscaping), Drawing A -1,
prepared by Architectural Design Company Inc., dated April 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of the
Humber River to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling. The property is on a
narrow tableland section of the Rainbow Creek Valley and Authority staff have had extensive
dealings with establishing the limits of development on this site during review and approval of
the related Plan of Subdivision 19T- 92017, and Zoning Z.96.033 applications, circulated by the
City of Vaughan. During the review of these prior applications, detailed top -of -bank stakings
and geotechnical studies were undertaken to establish setbacks and define the limits of the
Open Space and Residential zones. All structures will maintain a minimum 10m setback from
the top -of -bank and grading within the setback will be minimal. The current detailed plans are
consistent with the criteria and requirements established under the prior approvals noted.
Control of Flooding:
The property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Humber
River and accordingly, there will be no impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing is to be erected around the valley perimeter to prevent sediment from
entering the valley corridor and watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
Minimal grading and disturbance will occur within the established Open Space zone however,
no existing vegetation will require removal and all disturbed areas will be reinstated upon
completion of works. Detailed geotechnical studies commissioned under prior approvals have
established the appropriate setbacks and the proposal meets these requirements.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2 - New Development, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
366
CFN: 33172
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 3, 2002
Application #: 171 /02/VAUG
8.1.10 REGION OF YORK
To alter a waterway on (Pine Valley Drive, north of Rutherford Road), in the City of
Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of
York.
The purpose is to alter a tributary watercourse of the Humber River in order to facilitate the
emergency replacement of an existing culvert which is currently in danger of collapsing.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Culvert Replacement at Pine Valley Drive, Drawing Prepared by the Region of York,
dated received by TRCA, June 17th, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking, dated June 25, 2002, from Mr. Geoff Fairless, Operations
Project Manager, Region of York Transportation and Works Department, committing
to all TRCA requirements for instream work, sediment control and restoration.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The TRCA is in receipt of a request by the Region of York Transportation and Works
Department to conduct the emergency replacement of a culvert on Pine Valley Drive, just north
of Rutherford Road, which conveys flow from a Humber River tributary. The Region has
identified serious structural deficiencies due to rusting and broken joints which may result in
collapse of the road during a major storm event. The proposal is to replace the existing culvert
with a minor change in alignment of the new culvert to improve the stream flow. Authority staff
are satisfied that the proposal constitutes an emergency works situation, however, have
indicated that the timing of the request would allow for consideration by the Authority's
Executive Committee for full permit approvals. Authority staff 1-ave received plans illustrating
the proposed works and correspondence detailing the methocology for sediment control, flow
routing and restoration works. Staff are satisfied that the works will not constitute a HADD
(Harmful Alteration Disruption or Destruction of Fish Habitat) given the mitigative measures
proposed. The works will necessitate the closure of Pine Valley Drive for approximately 2 days
which will cause some disruption to traffic entering the Kortright Centre, however, access will
still be available from Major Mackenzie Drive. The Region wi I post the necessary detour signs
to re- direct traffic and will attempt to construct the works during a time which minimizes traffic
disruption to the Kortright Centre.
367
Control of Flooding:
The works will not require any significant fill placement or alteration to the floodplain and the
proposed new culvert is the same size as the existing one. Accordingly, there will be no
impacts to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
The proposal will require in- stream works which consist of installing a pea - gravel bag coffer
dam on either side of the road crossing to create a small ponding area. Flows are then to be
pumped around the work area during construction to minimize sedimentation, which will also
be complemented by the installation of sediment control fencing along the road beds.
Conservation of Land:
All works are to be completed within the Coldwater Fisheries Construction window (June 15th
to September 15) and all disturbed areas are to be immediately stabilized upon completion of
construction. No significant vegetation removal is required and restoration will include the
planting of native shrubs and the placement of river run stone within the channel at both ends
of the new culvert.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 3.3 - Policies for Identifying Watercourses and
Alterations, and Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33310
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: June 18, 2002
Application #: 239 /02/VAUG
8.1.11 SALVATORE CACCAMO
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Concession 8, (104 Dolores
Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Salvatore Caccamo.
The purpose is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of the
Humber River to facilitate construction of a single family dwelling on an existing lot of record.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan (illustrating Grading, Sediment Controls and Landscaping), Drawing A -1,
prepared by Architectural Design Company Inc., dated April 2002, revised to May 24,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
368
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of the
Humber River to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling and associated
landscaping. The property is on a narrow tableland section of the Rainbow Creek Valley and
Authority staff have had extensive dealings with establishing the limits of development on this
site during review and approval of the related Plan of Subdivision 19T- 92017, and Zoning
Z.96.033 applications, circulated by the City of Vaughan. During the review of these prior
applications, detailed top -of -bank stakings and geotechnical•studies were undertaken to
establish setbacks and define the limits of the Open Space and Residential zones.' All
structures will maintain a minimum 10m setback from the top -of -bank and grading within the
setback will be minimal. The current detailed plans are consistent with the criteria and
requirements established under the prior approvals noted.
Control of Flooding:
The property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Humber
River and accordingly, there will be no impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing is to be erected around the valley perimeter to prevent sediment from
entering the valley corridor and watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
Minimal grading and disturbance will occur within the established Open Space zone however
no existing vegetation will require removal and all disturbed areas will be reinstated upon
completion of works. Additional plantings will be undertaken along a 5m buffer strip adjacent'
to the Open Space corridor. Detailed geotechnical studies commissioned under prior
approvals have established the appropriate setbacks and the proposal meets these
requirements.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2 - New Development, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33173
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 3, 2002
Application #: 170 /02NAUG
8.1.12 TONY & FRANKA POLICARO
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 98, Plan 2810, (111 Longview Crescent),
in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Tony & Franka Policaro.
The purpose is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of the
Humber Riverto facilitate the construction of an addition and landscaping to an existing house.
369
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Drawing Al, prepared by Arcos Incorporated, dated May 22, 2002.
• Landscape Plan, Drawing L -1 prepared by Thomas Sparling Inc., dated May 26, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct an addition to an existing house, and a stone patio with associated
site grading. Only a small portion of the patio construction is within TRCA's Regulated Area
and the limit of all new works is setback greater than 10m from the top -of -bank of the Humber
River Valley.
Control of Flooding:
The property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River, and
therefore, there will be no impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
The works are well setback from the valley corridor, separated by a large lawn and an existing
fence and therefore, there are no anticipated impacts of sedimentation within the Valley.
Conservation of Land:
Works are to occur only on currently manicured portions of an existing residential yard, and all
disturbed areas are to be stabilized immediately upon completion.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in conformity to Section 4..2 C - Minor Additions, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33289
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For Information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: June 14, 2002
TOWN OF CALEDON
Application #: 228 /02/VAUG
8.1.13 ANTHONY AND DONNA CIANFARANI
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 100, Plan BOL -7, (134 Sackville Street), in the
Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Anthony and Donna Cianfarani.
The purpose is to place fill material within the Regional Storm Flood Plain associated with the
Bolton Special Policy Area and located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in
order to construct an addition to an existing residential dwelling at 134 Sackville Street, Bolton.
370
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan of All of Lot 100 and Part of lot 96, Block 4, by Young & Young Surveying
Inc., received June 24, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place fill material within the Regional Storm Floodplain of a Fill Regulated
Area of the Humber River in order to construct an addition to an existing residential dwelling at
134 Sackville Street, Bolton. The subject property is located within the Bolton Special Policy
Area (SPA) which allows for development within the floodplain provided it meets SPA criteria.
The proposed works meet all applicable SPA criteria. The works are in progress and the
permit is being submitted to resolve an outstanding violation. The works are supported by the
municipality.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are permissible within the Bolton SPA and meets SPA floodproofing
criteria. The proposed addition and associated ingress and egress will be floodproofed to the
level of the 350 Year Flood.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed around the proposed works to prevent
construction generated sediments from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored following construction. As there will be no instream works,
there are no concerns related to fish habitat Toss. No significant resource features will be
impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development/Redevelopment Guidelines within
Designated Two Zone and Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program.
CFN: 33245
Report Prepared by: Maria Flores, extension 5244
For. Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: May 24, 2002
Application #: 206 /02 /CAL
8.1.14 GORD KENMIR
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 36, Plan 43M -1374, (52 English Rose
Lane), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Gord Kenmir.
371
The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in order to
construct a deck addition incorporating a hot tub, a patio and minor landscaping works at the
rear of an existing residence located at 52 English Rose Lane, Bolton.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan for addition of deck, patio and minor landscaping works at 52 English Rose
Lane, received by TRCA June 17, 2002, labeled 52 English Rose Lane, Bolton, Ontario
L7E 2M9 - redlined revised by TRCA June 25, 2002.
• Survey of Lot 36, Registered Plan 43M -1374, dated August 29, 2001, signed by John
Young, Ontario Land Surveyor, received by June 17, 2002.
• Construction Plan for addition of deck and patio, received by TRCA June 17, 2002,
labeled Gord & Linda Kenmir, 52 English Rose Lane, Bolton, Ontario L7E 2M9.
Cross - section diagram, received by TRCA June 17, 2002, labeled Gord & Linda
Kenmlr, 52 English Rose Lane, Bolton, Ontario L7E 2M9.
• Grading Plan, received by TRCA June 17, 2002, labeled Gord & Linda Kenmir, 52
English Rose Lane, Bolton, Ontario L7E 2M9.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in order to
construct a deck addition incorporating a hot tub, a patio and minor landscaping works at the
rear of an existing residence situated on a subdivision lot located within the developed portion
of the Humber River Valley in Bolton. The works are within a landscaped rear yard and are
situated more than 100 metres from the watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and, therefore, will
not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are over 100 metres from the watercourse and, therefore, no
sedimentation to the watercourse is expected from these works. As per redline revisions on
the site plan, filter fabric will be used to prevent any potential sedimentation from the minor
landscaping works from entering the municipal drainage ditch behind the property.
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope stability /geotechnical concerns associated with this proposal. With the
exception of minor landscaping, no major regrading works are proposed. The existing lot is
sodded and no significant natural resource features will be impacted by these works.
372
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Development & Redevelopment /
Intensification Within Non - Established Communities / Highly Urbanized Areas.
CFN: 33303
Report Prepared by: Maria Flores, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: June 18, 2002
Application #: 236/02/CAL
8.1.15 WILLIAM BURWOOD
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 138, Plan BOL 7, (80 Old King Road), in
the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned
by William Burwood.
The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to construct a deck addition at the
rear of an existing residence located within the valley corridor.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Construction Plan for addition of deck at 80 Old King Road, dated June 9, 2002,
initialed D.B., date received June 13, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to construct a deck addition at the
rear of an existing residence located within the valley corridor. The proposed deck is
approximately 27.9 square metres (300 square feet) and will be built to the rear of the existing
residence around an existing above ground pool structure.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Humber River, therefore the conveyance and storage of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located on a flat rear yard area where there are existing structures
and where there is no evidence to be concerned about erosion or slope stability. The property
is significantly set back from the watercourse such that there is no need for seaiment'controls.
Conservation of Land:
The proposal is located in a rear yard area where there are no geotechnical concerns for
erosion or slope stability. The works are not located near any significant natural resources.
373
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Development & Redevelopment /
Intensification Within Non - Established Communities / Highly Urbanized Areas.
CFN: 33287
Report Prepared by: Maria Flores, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: June 14, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 231/02/CAL
8.1.16 158272 CANADA INC.
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 6, Plan 445, (77 Main Street), in the Town
of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by 158272
Canada Inc..
The purpose is to relocate 15 feet to the south, and add to, an historic house in the Unionville
Special Policy Area, Markham.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing A9, Grading Plan of Proposed Relocated Historic House, prepared by Dave
Wylie Restorations Ltd., dated June 6, 2002, received June 10, 2002.
• Drawing Al2, Sediment Control Plan for Proposed Relocated Historic House,
prepared by Dave Wylie Restorations Ltd., dated June 4, 2002, received June 24,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to relocate an historic single family dwelling 12 metres to the south of its
current location, and to add on to the house. The property is located on an existing residential
lot in the Unionville Special Policy Area (SPA) of Markham. The house is being moved in order
to sever the lot into two, to create a second residential lot; there is no application for
construction on the second lot at this time. The consent application for severance was
reviewed by TRCA staff to our satisfaction and was approved by the Town of Markham.
Control of Flooding:
The house will be dry flood proofed to the 350 -year storm flood elevation, in accordance with
SPA requirements. All excavated fill will be removed from the site. Therefore, the proposed
works will not affect the storage and conveyance of flood waters.
374
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be established for the duration of construction, so that sediment
will not be able to enter the adjacent watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is situated on a level area of the valley slope, so there are no geotechnical
issues related to the proposed works. No significant natural resource features will be affected
by the proposed works. After construction, the site will be stabilized and restored to its original
condition with sod.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1(B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33311
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: June 19, 2002
Application #: 240 /02 /MARK
8,1.17 TERRY FULLERTON
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 21, Plan 401, (107 Main Street), in the Town of
Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Terry
Fullerton.
The purpose is to renovate and build an addition onto an existing garage located within the
fringe of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Renovation and Addition to Existing Garage -107 Main Street Markham Sheet 1 of 2
prepared by Structural Edge dated May 22, 2002.
• Renovation and Addition to Existing Garage -107 Main Street Markham Sheet 2 of 2
prepared by Structural Edge dated May 22, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following-information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of constructing a 4.7 x 2 metre addition and renovating a single car
garage in the fringe of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River to allow indoor
parking for a vehicle.
375
Control of Flooding:
No fill will be added to the site to facilitate development, and as the addition is minor, flood
water displacement is considered insignificant.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected during construction as the addition will be located 60 metres
from the watercourse, and no filling or excavating is required.
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope instability or geotechnical issues related to the proposed works. No
significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33320
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: June 21, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 244/02 /MARK
8.1.18 HARRY AND JACQUELINE NADLER
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 41, Plan 4215, (28 Maryvale Crescent), in
the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Harry and Jacqueline Nadler.
The purpose is to place fill within and conduct associated site grading within a TRCA
Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a new single family dwelling on an existing lot,
containing an existing dwelling which is to be demolished.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Drawing 28MaryV -SP, prepared by Micro Data, dated May 15, 2002 and
sediment fence detail.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill and conduct site grading within a Regulated Area of the East Don
River to facilitate the construction of a new single family dwelling. The new dwelling is located
outside the Fill Line, and only a small portion of the site grading is to occur within the
Regulated Area. The dwelling will be sited greater than 20m from the top -of -bank of the valley
corridor.
376
Control of Flooding:
The works are located outside the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Don River
and there will be no impacts to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be installed to prevent sedimentation of the valley corridor.
Conservation of Land:
No vegetation is to be removed and there will be no disturbance to the valley corridor. All
disturbed areas are to be stabilized immediately upon completion of construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.1 - New Development, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33244
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For Information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 24, 2002
Application #: 205/02/RH
8.1.19 REGION OF YORK
To alter a waterway on (Leslie Street, north of Elgin Mills Road East), in the Town of
Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Region
of York.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse to facilitate a 2m extension of an existing culvert under
Leslie Street, in order to complete emergency repairs to the road alignment and protective
guardrail.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Culvert Extension at Leslie Street, Drawing prepared by the Region of York, dated
received by TRCA, June 17, 2002 and accompanying correspondence.
• Letter of Undertaking, dated June 25, 2002, from Mr. Geoff Fairless, Operations
Project Manager, Region of York Transportation and Works Department, committing
to all TRCA requirements for instream work, sediment control and restoration.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
377
Proposal:
The TRCA is in receipt of a request by the Region of York Transportation and Works
Department to conduct emergency repairs to a narrow section of Leslie Street where it crosses
a Rouge River tributary north of Elgin Mills Road. Recent traffic accidents have resulted due to
a poorly designed curved guardrail alignment which leaves an impression that the roadway
significantly narrows at this location. The remedy proposed is to realign the guardrail to a
straight alignment, which will necessitate the extension of the culvert by 2m on each side, and
an expansion of the shoulder. The culvert extensions will match the existing concrete box
culvert and will be bolted on. The traveled roadbed will not change. Due to the high number
of accidents at this location and the damage incurred to the existing guardrail, the Region
wishes to conduct these repairs immediately. Authority staff are satisfied that the proposal
constitutes an emergency works situation, however, have indicated that the timing of the
request would allow for consideration by the Authority's Executive Committee for full permit
approvals.
Authority staff have received plans illustrating the proposed works and correspondence
detailing the methodology for sediment control, flow routing and restoration works. Staff are
satisfied that the works will not constitute a HADD (Harmful Alteration Disruption or Destruction
of Fish Habitat) given the mitigative measures proposed.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not require any significant fill placement or alteration to the floodplain and the
proposed new culvert extensions match the dimensions of the current box culvert.
Accordingly, there will be no impacts to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
The proposal will require in- stream works which consist of installing a temporary pea - gravel
bag coffer dam on either side of the road crossing to create a small ponding area. Flows are
then to be pumped around the work area during construction to minimize sedimentation, which
will also be complemented by the installation of sediment control fencing along the road beds.
Conservation of Land:
All works are to be completed within the Coldwater Fisheries Construction window (June 15th
to September 15) and all disturbed areas are to be immediately stabilized upon completion of
construction. No significant vegetation removal is required and restoration will include the
planting of native shrubs and the placement of river run stone within the channel at both ends
of the new culvert extention.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 3.3 - Policies for Identifying Watercourses and
Alterations, and Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33307
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: June 18, 2002
378
Application #: 238/02/RH
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES. #885/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Irene Jones -
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.20 - 8.1.27, inclusive), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items, for
which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.20 ACAPELLA LAND CORPORATION
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 14, Concession 2, (100
Westcreek Boulevard), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as
located on the property owned by Acapella Land Corporation.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall
into the Etobicoke Creek Floodplain in support of a new industrial building proposed for the
subject property.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004.
• Site Grading and Servicing 'Plan, prepared by Otma Consultants Limited, dated April
2002, revised June 14, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Jonah Turk of Acapella Land Corporation, dated
June 28, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of an outfall into the
Etobicoke Creek Floodplain in support of a new industrial building proposed for the subject
property. The industrial building is not part of this application and is subject to site plan
approval. The outfall is intended to direct storm flows into the Etobicoke Creek and has been
designed to maximize the distance of the pipe from the watercourse. Stormwater quality
control is to be managed through the use o- oil /grit seperators.
Control of Flooding:
The outfall has been designed to maintain existing grade elevations within the floodplain and
has been setback outside of the 100 -year erosion limit of the creek. Therefore, the proposed
works will not affect the conveyance or storage of flood water.
379
Pollution:
Detailed sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during
construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley and watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The outfall works will be maintaining existing grade elevations and will be setback outside of
the 100 -year erosion limit of the creek. There are no significant natural resources in the
proposed location for these works and all disturbed areas will be restored with native
vegetation following construction. Therefore, there are no geotechnical or fisheries concerns
associated with this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33148
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: April 26, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
Application #: 159/02/BRAM
8.1.21 GEOFFREY AND HELEN CLEMENT
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 4, Plan 3744, (60 Springbrook Gardens), in the
City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as
located on the property owned by Geoffrey and Helen Clement.
The purpose is to construct an addition to an existing house in the flood plain. The addition will
consist of a second storey only, supported by columns..
The permit will be issugd for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004.
• Lot Grading Plan of Part of Block A, Registered Plan 4064, Plan No. RC5486, prepared
by Rabideau & Czerwinski, dated June 21, 2002 - Redline revised to include silt fence
Back Elevation, Drawing No. 7, prepared by W.B., dated February 2002.
• Basement & Foundation, Drawing No. 2, prepared by W.B., dated February 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
380
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a minor addition (less than 50% of the existing gross floor area)
onto an existing house that is partially situated in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Mimico
Creek. The addition will consist of a second storey only, supported by columns. Minor
variances were required for increased depth and decreased side yard setback; the variance
application was reviewed to the satisfaction of TRCA staff and was approved by the
municipality. TRCA staff required a review under Ontario Regulation 158, as a condition of
approval for the variance.
Control of Flooding:
The constructed works will be dry flood proofed to the Regional Storm Flood Plain, so there will
be no impact to the conveyance or storage of flood waters. Staff are in receipt of a letter from a
structural engineer, confirming that the new addition will be able to withstand the depths and
velocities of flood waters expected under the Regional Storm.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be established for the duration of construction, in order to prevent
construction generated sediments from entering the adjacent watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is situated on a relativelt level area of the valley slope, so there are no
geotechnical issues related to the proposed works. No significant natural resource features
will be affected by the proposed works. After construction, the site will be stabilized and
restored to its original condition.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 C) - Minor Additions - Development and
Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas -
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33237
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: May 23, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 198/02/TOR
8.1.22 REGION OF YORK
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Lot 8, Concession 7, (north of Highway 7, on the west and east sides of Islington
Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Region of York.
381
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for removing existing 400mm sanitary sewer and
replacing with 900mm sanitary sewer; installing 350mm water main; widening of Islington
Avenue, installing extensions to bridge pier and abutments and deck ; removing sediment
build -up under north span; removing existing retaining wall and filling behind retaining wall
and armourstone wall) in a Fill Regulated Area; to construct structures (extension of existing
bridge pier, abutments and deck, retaining wall, armourstone wall, asphalt paving) within a
Regional Storm Floodplain; and to alter a watercourse ( Humber River) during the coldwater
timing window (July 1 to September 15, or as extended by MNR) through a coffer dam method
in order to work in the dry.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004.
• Islington Avenue, from Highway 7 to Langstaff, Contract 02 -101. Cover Sheet; Sheet
18- New Construction -Sta 3 +300 to Sta 3 +625; Sheet 19 -New Construction -Sta 3 +625
to Sta 3 +950; Sheet 23- Typical Sections and Details; Sheet 43- Humber River Bridge
Widening General Arrangement; Sheet 44- Humber River Bridge Widening Staging and
Removals; Sheet 45- Humber River Bridge Widening Foundations; Sheet 62- Retaining
Wall Plan and Elevation; Sheet 63- Retaining Wall Sections and Details; Sheet
67- Proposed Woodbridge Trunk Relief Sewer Phase 4 -Sta 3 +300 to Sta 3 +625; Sheet
68- Proposed Woodbridge Trunk Relief Sewer, Phase 4 -Sta 3 +625 to Sta 3 +950; dated
February 26, 2002; received February 27, 2002; prepared by UMA Engineering.
• Sheet 72- Proposed Woodbridge Trunk Relief Sewer, Phase 4- Details; Sheet 73- Bridge
and Utility Staging Details; Sheet 74- Bridge and Utility Staging; Sheet 75- Bridge and
Utility Staging; dated March 4, 2002; received March 6, 2002; prepared by UMA
Engineering Ltd.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering drawings and
restoration plans); dated June 27, 2002; received June 27, 2002; prepared by the
Region of York.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of the widening of Islington Avenue from Thistlewood Avenue in the
south to Langstaff Drive in the north from 2 to 5 lanes. TRCA staff commented on this section
of the widening during the Environmental Assessment process for Islington Avenue from
Highway 7 to Rutherford Road. The widening is now proceeding in phases. Sanitary sewer
and water main installation will be associated with this section of the widening and the
watercourse will be crossed via open cut on the west side of the Humber bridge just north of
Thistlewood. The bridge will require the removal of the existing deck, the extension of the
existing middle pier, the north and south abutments and the new deck by 15 metres to the
west. The existing bridge is a two span steel structure with a concrete deck and is 31 metres
long and 16 metres wide approximately. Sediments under the north span of the bridge will
need to be removed in order to increase the flow capacity and also to provide passage
required by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans -Coast Guard under the Navigable Waters
Act. An existing retaining wall on the east side of Islington, approximately 100m north of the
bridge, will need to be replaced with an armourstone wall (20 metres long by 1.2 metres high)
382
and a retaining wall ( 43.5 metre long and 1 metre height exposed) in order to facilitate the
road widening. The sewer and water main installation, bridge extension, proposed retaining
and armourstone walls are all located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm
Floodplain of the East Humber River.
Control of Flooding:
The hydraulics for the proposed bridge piers and abutments have been reviewed and it has
been determined that there will not be any implications to flooding. The existing openings of
the bridge spans will remain the same with the extension to the middle pier and north and
south abutments. Sediments will be removed from the north span to increase the capacity for
flows. The profile of Islington Avenue will modify slightly, however, this will have negligible
impacts on the floodplain.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, sediment trap for de- watering, coffer dams with
pea gravel , rock check dams) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated
sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed • areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project. The bridge works, sanitary sewer
and water main installation will require the relocation of the watercourse via coffer damming
and diversion in order to conduct works in the dry. The retaining and armourstone wall works
will also be isolated from the watercourse temporarily through a cofferdam. The in stream
works will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and
will require an authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The HADD
will be compensated with the following measures: through riparian plantings; through the
creation of 9sh spawning habitat, in- stream cover and refuge. When the DFO authorization
has been received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to
Waterways" permit. There are TRCA owned lands within the project limits from Thistlewood
Avenue to Langstaff, however, TRCA's Archaeologist has determined that the property has
been previously disturbed, therefore, there is no need for any archaeological investigation.
Property Reports have been submitted to the Executive Committee for the conveyance of land
for the widening and reconstruction of Islington Avenue from Highway 7 northward to
Rutherford Road. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32988
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For Information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: June 19, 2002
383
Application #: 094 /02/VAUG
TOWN OF CALEDON
8.1.23 CLUBLINK CORPORATION
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
(Regional Road 50 - Bolton Golf Course), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Clublink Corporation.
The purpose is to place and remove fill and construct four pedestrian crossings within a Fill
Regulated Area and the Regulatory Flood Plain to accommodate modifications of the existing
Caledon Woods Golf Course..
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004.
• Site Plan - Overall Site, Drawing No. S1, prepared by Paul Takahashi, dated February
2001, revised April 17, 2002, redlined note by TRCA July 3, 2002.
• Slte Servicing Plan, Drawing No. S2, prepared by Paul Takahashi, dated February
2001, revised April 17, 2002, redlined note by TRCA July 3, 2002.
• Cut and Fill Thematic, Drawing No. W4C, prepared by Philips Engineering, dated
February 2001, revised April 17, 2002, revised June 27, 2002, redlined note by TRCA
July 3, 2002.
• Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Drawing No. W4B, prepared by Philips
Engineering, dated February 2001, revised April 17, 2002, redlined note by TRCA July
3, 2002.
• Erosion and Sediment Control Details, Drawing No. W5, prepared by Philips
Engineering, dated January 2001, revised April 17, 2002.
• Golf Course Drainage System Plan, Drawing No. W6, prepared by Philips Engineering,
dated May 2001, revised April 17, 2002, redlined note by TRCA July 3, 2002.
• Golf Course Planting Plan, Drawing No. W11, prepared by prepared by Paul
Takahashi, dated July 2001, revised April 17, 2002, revised June 11, 2002, redllned
note by TRCA July 3, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Kenneth DePodesta of Philips Engineering, dated
July 2, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill and construct four pedestrian crossings within a Fill
Regulated Area and the Regulatory Flood Plain to accommodate modifications of the existing
Caledon Woods Golf Course. The entire golf course is being modified in an effort to reduce the
total number of holes while improving environmental impacts through increased setbacks and
reforestation adjacent to significant natural areas. These works relate to holes 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
and 11 which are located primarily in the valley. This application follows tableland
modifications for holes 4, 5, 12, 13, and 14 that were approved at the June Executive Meeting.
While vegetation removal for these works has been minimized, any losses will be compensated
with new areas of re- vegetation and buffer plantings around exposed natural areas.
384
Control of Flooding:
- The proposed grading has been balanced to ensure there will be no impacts to flood storage
and conveyance during flood events.
Po lution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be located between the proposed works and the
valley corridor to prevent construction generated sediment from entering the watercourse.
'Conservation of Land:
The impacts of the proposed works on the surrounding significant resource features will be
minimal and lost vegetation will be replaced along with the provision of additional plantings as
compensation. The new tees and greens have been located outside of the 100 -year erosion
limit of the watercourse. There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to these works.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.2.2 H) - Development and
Redevelopment/Intensification within Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33331
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: June 26, 2002
Application #: 255/02/CAL
8.1.24 REGION OF PEEL
To alter a waterway on Lot 20, Concession 4, in the Town of Caledon, Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by the Region of Peel.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse to facilitate the re- construction of an existing bridge
crossing of The Gore Road over the Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2002.
• General Arrangement Plan, Sheet 1 of 6,-by McCormick Rankin Corporation, date
received June 18, 2002, redlined note by TRCA July 2, 2002.
• Foundations and Retaining Walls, Sheet 2 of 6, by McCormick Rankin Corporation,
date received June 18, 2002.
• Parapet Wall with Railing, Sheet 3 of 6, by McCormick Rankin Corporation, date
received June 18, 2002.
• Railing for Parapet Wall, Sheet 4 of 6, by McCormick Rankin Corporation, date
received June 18, 2002.
• Landscaping Details I, Sheet 5 of 6, by McCormick Rankin Corporation, date received
June 18, 2002.
• Landscaping Details II, Sheet 6 of 6, by McCormick Rankin Corporation, date received
June 18, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to plantings); prepared by McCormick
Rankin Corporation, dated July 2, 2002.
385
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to alter a watercourse to facilitate the re- construction of an existing bridge
crossing of The Gore Road over the Humber River. The works include replacement of the
existing bridge structure with a larger span bridge.
Control of Flooding:
The applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of TRCA technical staff that the works will
not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent
sedimentation of any watercourse. The proposal also involved restoration of disturbed areas
with native herbaceous and woody vegetation
Conservation of Land:
There are no in stream works associated with the project and any potential impacts to fish
habitat can be mitigated through use of erosion control measures, working in the dry and
completing the works during the cold water timing guidelines (June 15 to Sept. 15). All
material storage and equipment refueling will be setback at least 30 metres from the
watercourse. The works will include removal of the existing bridge abutments including a small
portion that intrudes into the watercourse.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32373
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: June 21, 2001
Application #: 195/01/CAL
8.1.25 WILFRED R. DUPONT
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Lot 20, Concession 4, (15899 The Gore Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Wilfred R. Dupont.
The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a residential
bridge crossing the Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004.
386
• Plan - Temporary Bridge -15899 The Gore Road, redline revised by B.C., dated June
15, 2002.
• TRCA Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines - Silt Fence.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a temporary
bridge crossing the Humber River. The bridge is intended to accommodate a riding mower to
allow the owner to maintain his lands on the opposite side of the watercourse. It will rest on
concrete slabs placed on grade on both sides of the watercourse and will not require any
abutments or grade alteration.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood water as fill placement will consist
of only the support slabs which wi'l be located outside of the hydraulic floodway. All
construction debris will be stored outside of the floodplain area.
Pollution:
Soil disturbance should not be required during construction, however silt fencing is required to
be installed around any areas that may be inadvertently exposed.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not impact on any significant resource features. There will be no
instream works and there are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33306
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: June 18, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 237/02/CAL
8.1.26 ENBRIDGE CONSUMERS GAS
To place fill within a regulated area on (Major MacKenzie Drive between Yonge and
Bathurst), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Enbridge Consumers Gas.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in the Fill Regulated Area of the East Don River to
facilitate replacement of a NPS 6 ST 113-gas main crossing under the East Don. The gas
pipeline will be installed by directional drilling under the watercourse channel..
387
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004.
• Drawing Number 30- 3738 -02, Page 1 of 1 prepared by Enbridge Consumers Gas
dated May 2, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by Chuck Reaney of Enbridge Consumers Gas dated
June 25, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and replacing fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the
installation of a NPS 6 ST IP gas main replacement beneath the Don River. The gas pipeline
will be installed using directional drilling under the watercourse channel.
Control of Flooding:
No excavated material will be stockpiled within the flood plain and all existing grades will be
maintained. The control of flooding will therefore not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will encircle the bore pits to impede the overland migration of construction
generated sediments.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no instream works. The conduit will be installed through the use of directional
drilling a minimum of 1.5 metres (2.5 if coldwater - to be verified by ecologist) beneath the
watercourse. No riparian vegetation will be impacted by the proposed works. All disturbed
areas will be re- vegetated following construction. There are no fisheries concerns or
geotechnical concerns related to this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33212
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 15, 2002
TOWNSHIP OF KING
Application #: 189/02/RH
8.1.27 ENBRIDGE CONSUMERS GAS
To alter a waterway on Lot 4, 5, Concession 5 WYS, (King Side Road and Jane
Street), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Enbridge Consumers Gas.
388
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in the fill regulated area to facilitate the installation of a
NPS 4 gas pipeline crossing running from Highway 400 east along the south side of King Road
and south along the west side of Jane Street for 625 metres. Installation of the pipeline will
require directional drilling below the East Humber River and open trench installation within the
Fill Regulated Area of the East Humber River..
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004.
• Drawing Number 30- 3075 -02 prepared by Enbridge Consumers Gas dated April 8,
2002, Page 4 of 6.
• Drawing Number 30- 3075 -02 prepared by Enbridge Consumers Gas dated April 8,
2002, Page 6 of 6.
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by Chuck Reaney of Enbridge Consumers Gas dated
June 25, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and replacing fill in a regulated area to facilitate the
installation of a NPS 4 Gas pipeline beneath the East Humber River and a tributary, involving a
total of two crossings. The gas pipeline will be installed by directional drilling under the
watercourses
Control of Flooding:
No excavated material will be stockpiled within the flood plain and all existing grades will be
maintained. The control of flooding will therefore, not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will encircle the bore pits to impede the overland migration of construction
generated sediments.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no instream works. The conduit will be installed through use of directional drilling
boring a minimum of (2.5 or 1.5 - to be determined by ecologist) metres beneath the
watercourses. No riparian vegetation will be impacted by the proposed works. All disturbed
areas will be re- vegetated following construction. There are o fisheries concerns (subject to
ecologists review) or geotechnical issues related to this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33239
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 23, 2002
389
Application #: 200 /02 /KING
CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY)
8.1.28 DCP WRONG TURN PRODUCTIONS
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area (Morningside Park), in
the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by The Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm
Floodplain associated with the Highland Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 5, 2002 to July 4, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Cabin Site Plan, Armour stone Wall Details sheets 1 - 3, Road Installation Details
sheets 1 - 4.
• Letter of Restoration, prepared by the applicant, dated July 2, 2002, received July 3,
2002
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm
Floodplain associated with the Highland Creek, in order to facilitate the construction of a
temporary 561 square meter (1840 square foot) pre- constructed cabin and a 4.5 meter (15
foot) wide, and 20 meter (65 foot) long temporary dirt road. The proposed works will be
constructed and utilized during a two month movie shoot. All works will be removed and the
site restored upon completion.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the hydraulic floodway associated with the
Highland Creek. Works and filming will take place during months of expected low flows
(July /August), and will be removed upon completion. The storage and conveyance of
floodwaters will not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
Excavation will only be required for the digging of 15 cabin support post holes. Sedimentation
of the watercourse will not occur as a result of this project.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located within an flat area devoid of native and woody vegetation, and
will be restored to the satisfaction of TRCA staff. The works are set -back a distance of 7 meters
(24 feet), from the Highland Creek. The conservation of land will not be affected.
390
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.2. - New Resource -Based Uses - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 33344
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 2, 2002
Application #: 264/02/TOR
RES. #B86/02 - CONSULTING ENGINEER SERVICES FOR THE UPGRADING OF
HVAC SYSTEMS AND RELATED BUILDING ELEMENTS LOCATED AT
THE 5 SHOREHAM DRIVE, DOWNSVIEW, ONTARIO FACILITY
Award of Contract. Award of contract for consulting engineer services for
the uperading of HVAC systems and related building elements located at
the 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario facility.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Lorna Bissell
THAT the firm of TMP Consulting Engineers be retained to undertake the engineering -
service for upgrading of the HVAC systems and related building elements located at the 5
Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario facility; at a total cost of between $17,250 and
$28,080 plus GST depending on the HVAC option that is Implemented; this being the
proposal that best meets the Authority's specification.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The TRCA facility at 5 Shoreham Drive was originally constructed in 1971 followed by a minor
addition in 1975. The total facility is approximately 20,000 square feet with primary use as
office space /headquarters for the TRCA staff. The original HVAC systems are still in use today
and major components of these systems have been identified as being near the end of their
useful life cycle. Space comfort within the facility has also been area of challenge due to HVAC
systems performance and'related building construction elements.
As a result the Authority is hiring a consultant engineer to deliver the following services:
i) Design development for HVAC and related systems retrofit;
ii) Preparation of tender documentation package for award to prime contractor;
iii) Ongoing project review & co- ordination services with construction management
personnel & owner's representative;
iv) Verification of tender compliance and overall system commissioning.
Also, the TRCA proposes to install a Biofiltration System within the Shoreham facility (cafeteria)
in order to explore the viability and benefits of applying this technology to typical indoor
commercial office space. The botanical biofiltration system is to be installed as an integral
component of the proposed HVAC system retrofit.
391
RATIONALE
Requests for proposals were sent to eight companies and proposals were received as follows:
CH2M Hill Declined
Enerlife Declined
HH Angus & Associates Ltd. 10% of Built Cost approx. $50,000 excluding GST
Keen Engineering Co. Ltd. Submitted proposal without
a fee
Keewatin -Aski Ltd. Declined
M &E Engineering Ltd.
Smith & Anderson Consulting
Engineering
TMP Consulting Engineers
HVAC Upgrade $23,500 excluding GST
Biofiltrating System $ 9,500 excluding GST
HVAC Base Bid
Biofiltrating System
Commissioning Fee
Option #1 (7.5% of $230,000)
Option #2 (10.8% of $260,000)
Option #3 (9.3 % of $280,000)
Biofiltration System
$40,000 excluding GST
$15,000 excluding GST
$ 6,000 excluding GST
$17,250 excluding GST
$28,080 excluding GST
$26,040 excluding GST
9.5% of cost of work
The proposals were reviewed and scored on the following criteria: response, attendance at the
site meeting, HVAC experience, Green experience, options presented, design detail, fee /cost
structure, fee structure detail, design team partners, design time lines.
As a result of the scoring, it is recommended that TMP Consulting Engineers be retained to
carry out the engineering services for the upgrade of the HVAC systems and related building
elements located at the 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview facility. Although TMP was not the
lowest priced bidder, overall the proposal from TMP demonstrated a superior knowledge of our
facility, and addressed most effectively the compliance and timing issues related to this project.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Costs of this contract are part of the Head Office retrofit project which was approved in the
2002 budget.
Report prepared by: Lori Colussi, extension 5303
For Information contact: Lori Colussi, extension 5303, Jim Dillane, extension 6292
Date: June 26, 2002
392
RES. #B87/02 - FLOODPLAIN MAPPING SCANNING AND VECTORIZATION
PROJECT FOR THE DUFFINS CREEK WATERSHED
Approval to retain QSP Geographics Ltd. to convert TRCA Duffins Creek
1:2000 scale floodplain mapping to digital format in order to facilitate the
update and management of Flood and Fill Regulation Line Mapping.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Lorna Bissell
THAT the Authority enter Into an agreement with QSP Geographlcs Ltd. to complete the
conversion of 14, 1:2000 scale analogue floodplain map sheets within the Duffins Creek
Watershed at a cost of $1,100 per map sheet excluding applicable taxes.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
One of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and
mapped information for use by the Authority and others, and to incorporate improved
technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order
to continue to provide accurate floodplain management information, the Water Management
Division has prepared a Floodplain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific
requirements necessary to update the Authority's current Flood and Fill Line Regulation
Mapping. Priority watersheds identified within the Work Plan include the Duffins Creek given
the extent of previous, current and future development activities.
A visual screening process has been completed to compare topographic and planimetric
features contained on the Authority's 1977 based analogue mapping with recent aerial
photography (Year 2000) to determine where significant changes warrant the preparation of
new base mapping. From this assessment, it was determined that approximately 14 analogue
map sheets within the Duffins Creek Watershed have not significantly changed subsequent to
the original date of completion. It is proposed to convert these 14 analogue map sheets into
digital format in order to permit TRCA staff to continue to update base mapping information as
future changes occur and to facilitate integration with new digital mapping.. For those map
sheets where significant changes have occurred, the preparation of new digital mapping is
required.
A review of available technologies concluded that the most cost effective method available to
convert current TRCA analogue mapping into digital format is through a scanning and
vectorization process. The process, offered only through QSP Geographics Inc., involves
scanning the hard copy map sheets into the computer as raster images and vectorizing key
features (i.e., contours, watercourses, culverts, bridges etc.) into individual, unique lines
through proprietary software developed specifically for this application. In addition, QSP
Geographics has committed to deliver the final product within 6 weeks of project initiation and
have provided a detailed cost which represents a substantial cost savings when compared to
the preparation of new digital base mapping at approximately $5,000 per sheet.
In light of the above, it is recommended that this work be sole sourced to QSP Geographics
Ltd.
393
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds required to complete the project are available from the Region of Durham.
Report prepared by: Marilee Gadzovski, extension 5362
For Information contact: Marilee Gadzovski, extension 5362
Date: June 26, 2002
RES.#B88/02 - THE CITY OF TORONTO, VALLEY AND SHORELINE
REGENERATION PROJECT, 2002 - 2006
18 Bitteroot Road, City of Toronto. Authorization to proceed with a
detailed technical investigation and possible emergency remedial works
related to a ravine slope failure adjacent to #18 Bitteroot Road, City of
Toronto.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Lorna Bissell
THAT staff be directed to work with the City of Toronto in completing a technical
investigation of the slope failure adjacent to the residence at #18 Bitteroot Road, City of
Toronto.
THAT If determined through the technical review that the residence is at imminent risk,
that staff be directed to undertake emergency works for the stabilization of the effected
slope.
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to reassess project priorities and reallocate funds
within the 2002 Valley and Shoreline Regeneration Project Budget to accommodate the
emergency works.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND .
On June 21st , 2002 the TRCA was notified of a slope failure in the ravine adjacent to the
residence at #18 Bitteroot Road, City of Toronto. Subsequently both TRCA and City of Toronto
staff visited the site to undertake a preliminary investigation to access both the cause of the
failure and the impacts to the private residence and property. It was determined that the
reported slope failure had likely been caused by the discharge of water into the affected ravine
by a contractor retained by the City of Toronto, Works & Emergency Services Division.
394
Upon further visual inspection along the ravine valley it was revealed that the entire slope
adjacent to #18 Bitteroot Road was in an unstable state, as evidenced bt the nearly vertical
bare slopes. It was clear that although the erosion had been accelerated in one area by the
work of the water main contractor, the storm water flowing through the ravine had been
eroding the slopes throughout the ravine at a very aggressive rate. Based on the opinion of
technical staff from both TRCA and the City, it was felt that the homes on both sides of the
ravine were potentially at risk. It was therefore agreed to proceed with a joint geotechnical
investigation to fully assess the nature of the risk to the dwellings and road aajacent to the
' ravine, and to assist in developing designs for the remedial stabilization works. As part of their
work, the geotechnical engineer will also provide an opinion as the extent of the contractor's
liability, and recommend appropriate compensation.
The ravine land adjacent to 18 Bitteroot is owned by the TRCA under management agreement
to the City.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
A preliminary- review of our existing Project budget indicates that up to $227,000 could be
reallocated `rom the Wicksteed Avenue slope stabilization project slated to commence later
this year. Should this happen, the Wicksteed project would be rescheduled for the summer of
2003.
Funds for the damage caused by the work of the contractor's negligence will be recovered
from the contractor.
Report prepared by: Jim Berry (416) 392 -9721
Date: July 03, 2002
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:52 a.m., on July 5, 2002.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
395
t■
erTHE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/02
July 26, 2002
The Executive Committee Meeting #7/02, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek
Pioneer Village, on Friday, July 26, 2002. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to
order at 9:10 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Member
Lorna Bissell Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Irene Jones Member
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
REGRETS
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Ron Moeser Member
RES.#B89/02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Irene Jones
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #5/02, held on July 5, 2002, be approved.
CARRIED
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Craig Mather, CAO, declared a conflict of interest with respect to item 8.1.18 - Staritec
Consulting Limited (formerly Cosburn Patterson Mather Ltd.) as his wife is an employee of
Stantec.
396
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #B90 /02 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS
Rear of 7 Bevan Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York
CFN 33029. Receipt of a request to consider disposing of a parcel of
TRCA land at the rear of 7 Bevan Road, located south of Major
Mackenzie Drive, west of Keele Street in the Maple area of the City of
Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Maria Augimeri
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Item 7.1 - Request for Disposal of
Authority Owned Lands, Rear of 7 Bevan Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of
York, be deferred to Executive Committee Meeting #8/02, to be held on September 6,
2002.
CARRIED
RES. #B91 /02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffin Creek Watershed
Doreen Trifiletti, CFN 32685. Acquisition of a parcel of land located west
of Concession Road 3, south of Durham Regional Road 21, Township of
Uxbridge, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection & Acquisition
Project 2001 - 2005 ", floodplain and conservation component, Duffin
Creek Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Resolution #264/01, adopted by the
Authority at Meeting #10/01, held on January 11, 2002, be rescinded and the following be
approved:
THAT 5.69 hectares (14.05 acres) more or less, consisting of a rectangular shaped parcel
of vacant land together with an access be purchased from Doreen Trifiletti, said land
being Part of Lot 13, Concession 2, Township of Uxbridge, in the Regional Municipality of
Durham, on the west side of Concession Road 3, south of Durham Regional Road 21 and
further described as Parts 1 and 2 on Reference Plan 40R- 21210;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, with the Authority being
responsible for the cost of the survey and reasonable legal fees;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance,
subject to existing service easements;
397
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be Instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred Incidental to
the closing for the land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005.
At Authority Meeting #10/01 held on January 11, 2002, the Authority adopted Resolution
#264/01 that:
THAT 6.83 hectares (16.89 acres) more or less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel
of vacant land be received from Doreen Trifiletti, said land being Part of Lot 13,
Concession 2, Township of Uxbridge, in the Regional Municipality of Durham, on the
west side of Concession Road #3, south of Durham Regional Road 21 and further
described as Part 4 on Plan 40R- 20687;
THAT the acquisition of the donation is to be on the following basis;
(a) The purchase price be $2.00;
(b) An income tax receipt is to be made available to Doreen Trifiletti for the appraised
value of the donation in accordance with the guidelines set out by Canada Customs and
Revenue Agency;
(c) The Authority is responsible for appraisal and reasonable legal fees.
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be Authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
Originally, it was the intent of John and Doreen Trifiletti to donate the rear portion of their
property to the Authority through the Ecological Gift Program, along with a right -of -way.
However, recently John and Doreen Trifiletti have approached the Authority and suggested
they would prefer to convey the area which was originally designated for the right -of -way. This
change results in the Authority acquiring a 14.05 acre parcel of vacant land and would also
result in a severance of a 1.29 acre parcel improved w th a home and a 35.79 acre parcel also
improved with a home.
398
Mr. & Mrs. Trifiletti have been made aware that by conveyance of the right -of -way lands to the
Authority, a charitable tax receipt would not be issued by the Authority for the rear lands, nor
would the donation of land qualify under the Ecological Gift Program with Environment
Canada, due to an issue of "betterment" caused by the severance of the lands.
Under the Planning Act, the Authority is exempt from obtaining a severance when acquiring
environmental lands. Authority staff have met with officials from the Township of Uxbridge with
regards to this matter. On June 17, 2002, the Planning Committee for The Township of
Uxbridge adopted the following recommendation "THAT we support the request by the
T.R.C.A. for acquisition of lands and that the entrance be limited to forty feet or less."
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the acquisition of the property.
A plan illustrating this location is attached.
RATIONALE
The subject property is located on the west side of the 3rd Concession Road, south of Durham
Regional Road 21, in the Township of Uxbridge. The property is on the Oak Ridges Moraine
and is in the vicinity of Authority holdings in the area. The property is within a significant
headwater area in the Duffin Creek Watershed and is targeted for a natural cover and habitat
restoration area. The acquisition will provide long -term protection from development and this
property will help consolidate the protection of the resource features provided by the Authority
holdings in the area.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
It is estimated that taxes would be $50.00 per acre. The Authority maintains lands in this
vicinity. It is expected that the maintenance costs will increase although not significantly
because of these types of lands require a low degree of maintenance.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
All costs including survey, environmental and legal fees are to be charged to account
004 -11.
Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Tom Campitelli, extension 5335
Date: July 12, 2002
Attachment:1
399
Attachment 1
I R eLr. -
NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001-2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffin Creek Watershed
, •
Doreen Trifiletti
CFN 32685
)
/ k • • .
•••.,
•
I t•
. r
• I ..1• •
•
Ulm=
11E6ORD-". ROAD
/
•
400
RES.#B92/02 - THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF CALEDON
Request for a Permanent Easement for an outlet, swale and storm water
management pond, Humber River Watershed, Town of Caledon,
CFN 28447. Receipt of a request from the Corporation of the Town of
Caledon to provide a permanent easement for an outlet, swale and storm
water management pond on the east side of Albion- Vaughan Road,
south of King Road, Humber River Watershed, Township of King,
Regional Municipality of York.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from the Corporation of the Town of
Caledon to provide a permanent easement for an outlet, swale and storm water
management pond on the east side of Albion- Vaughan Road, south of King Road,
Township of King, Regional Municipality of York;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Corporation of the Town of Caledon in this
Instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing 0.653 hectares, more or Tess, (1.614 acres) be
granted to the Corporation of the Town of Caledon for an outlet, swale and storm water
management pond, said land being Part of Lot 5, Concession 11, Township of King,
Regional Municipality of York;
THAT TRCA grant the easement across the subject land on the following terms and
conditions;
(a) The consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00;
(b) The Corporation of the Town of Caledon is to pay all legal, appraisal, survey and
other costs incurred to complete the transaction;
(c) The Corporation of the Town of Caledon Is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and
all claims for injuries, damages or costs of any nature, resulting in any way, either
directly or indirectly, from the granting of this easement or carrying out of
construction;
(d) THAT archaeological investigation is to be conducted before any site disturbance
with any mitigative measures required being carried out all at the expense of the
Corporation of the Town of Caledon;
THAT said easement be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
401
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The subject lands form part of a larger acreage acquired by TRCA from K. Dalton on October
5, 1969 under the Nashville Dam and Reservoir Project. The Corporation of the Town of
Caledon has conveyed lands to TRCA over the years for nominal consideration of $2.00 and
has requested that these lands be conveyed for the nominal consideration of $2.00
In addition to the fee simple conveyance, Corporation of the Town of Caledon has requested to
utilize 0.336 hectares (0.830 acres) of TRCA lands in this area for temporary construction
purposes. A plan illustrating both thepermanemt easement and temporary easement locations
is attached.
The outlet, swale and storm water management pond will deal with the storm water from the
Albion- Vaughan Road which will be constructed by the Town.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Town of Caledon has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in
completing this transaction.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: July 12, 2002
Attachments: 1
402
Attachment 1
RE:
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF CALEUUN
Request for a Permanent Easement for an outlet, swale and storm
water management pond
Humber River Watershed, Town of Caledon
CFN 28447
403
RES.#B93/02 - HEAD OFFICE HEATING /AIR CONDITIONING RETROFIT
Authorization to Award Contract. Authorizes the Chair, Director, Finance
and Business Development and Chief Administrative Officer to award a
contract for purchase and installation of head office heating and air
conditioning system.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Chair, Chief Administrative
Officer and the Director, Finance and Business Development be authorized to award a
contract not to exceed $596,625 for purchase and installation of heating and
air - conditioning systems at the Authority's Head Office subject to the contract being
tendered in accordance with the TR,CA Purchasing Policy and a report on the results of
the tender being available to the Executive Committee at its September 5, 2002, meeting.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The-TRCA facility at 5 Shoreham Drive was originally constructed in 1971 followed by a minor
addition in 1975. The original heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems (HVAC) are still
in use today and major components of these systems have been identified as being near the
end of their useful life cycle. Space comfort within the facility has also been an area of
challenge due to HVAC systems performance and related building construction elements.
The firm of TMP Consulting Engineers was retained by the TRCA, under Res. #86/02 adopted
at Executive Committee Meeting #6/02, held on July 5, 2002, to design the upgrades to the
HVAC systems and related building elements. The consultant was asked to deliver the
following services:
i) Design development for HVAC and related systems retrofit;
ii) Preparation of tender documentation package for award to prime contractor;
iii) Ongoing project review & co-ordination services with construction management personnel &
owner's representative;
iv) Verification of tender compliance and overall system commissioning.
RATIONALE
Staff has been implementing the head office retrofit project of which the replacement of heating
and air conditioning systems is a critical part. The objectives of the project are.to maximize
operational cost savings in terms of reduced maintenance and energy efficiency, to improve
the head office work environment and demonstrate the Authority's commitment to
environmentally sustainable solutions and products.
The HVAC project has very tight timelines to ensure that the installation can be done in the late
fall before severe winter conditions occur. This requires that equipment orders be placed no
later than the end of August. The Authority's consultants will have tender specifications
available for release to contractors by the end of July so that a contract could be awarded in
August. Because there is no meeting in July, staff is seeking authorization for the Chair, Chief
Administrative Officer and the Director of Finance and Business Development to award the
contract which will enable the contractor to place the necessary equipment order. The
404
Authority's Purchasing Policy will be followed and staff will report to the September Executive
Committee on the results of the contract process.
TMP Consulting Engineers have provided the TRCA with three system options and
construction budgets. Of the three options provided, TMP highly recommends Option 3, which
addresses all of the key issues established by the TRCA, for a total construction budget of
$596,625. For a complete summary and explanation of the three options as presented by
TMP, please refer to Attachment 1.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
This project is included in the Authority's approved budget as part of the Head Office Retrofit
Project.
Report prepared by: Jim Dillane, 416 - 667 -6292
For Information contact: Jim Dillane, 416- 667 -6292
Date: July 12, 2002
Attachments: 1
405
Attachment 1
-Ivy pi Consulting
Engineers
TORONTO & REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
5 SHOREHAM DRIVE
UPGRADE OF HVAC SYSTEMS AND RELATED BUILDING ELEMENTS
PREDESIGN REPORT
24 JULY 2002
OUR FILE NO: 02 -1053
BY
THE MITCHELL PARTNERSHIP INC.
285 YORKLAND BOULEVARD
WILLOWDALE, ONTARIO
M2J 1S5
406
5 SHOREHAM DRIVE - HVAC UPGRADES
OUR FILE NO: 02 -1053
24 JULY 2002
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) 5 Shoreham Drive Facility has heating, ventilation
and air conditioning s /stems both aged and in a condition to be due for replacement. The Mitchell
Partnership Inc. (TMP has been retained to deign these upgrades.
Key issues established with TRCA for the design upgrade include:
1. Energy efficiency, longer fife cycle, lower maintenance costs and their positive implication on
green design to endorse TRCA principles are important.
2. New rooftop air conditioning and ventilation equipment and a new heating system all operating
under DDC building control system are necessary. The system may also support a future '
breathing wall' project.
3. New ceiling tiles (and carpet) are upcoming upgrades planned by TRCA to be
coordinated with construction.
4. The system provided will maximize resale value.
Three system options and construction budgets have been developed at this concept design stage.
OPTION 1
A current generation replacement of existing rooftop multizone units and a boiler system at standard 80%
efficiency with new piping and radiant ceiling panels at the perimeter in lieu of existing fan tube cabinet
radiators. This form of heating has opportunity to best integrate with the ceiling system upgrade and
minimize costs associated with fin tube piping removed and replacement patch and repair. All installed
with DDC control system
Construction budget - $536,425
OPTION 2
A single gas fired rooftop Variable Air Volume (VAV) unit to serve the entire building to replace the
existing multizone format with VAB boxes replacing existing multizones and a heating system as identified
in Option 1. All installed with a DDC building control system.
Construction Budget - $548,280.
OPTION 3
A single rooftop VAV unit equipped with heating coils and a more efficient evaporative cooler system
option. The heating coils would be incorporated into the heating system based on a high efficiency
(90 % +) condensing boiler. Radiant panels at the perimeter would also be applied.
Construction budget - $596,625.
407
Page 1
5 SHOREHAM DRIVE - HVAC UPGRADES
OUR FILE NO: 02 -1053
24 JULY 2002
OPTION 1 will provide some efficiency improvements by virtue of modern equipment but is of least value
to address TRCA principles, future breathing wall application to the entire building, and resale appeal for
office application. Not recommended.
OPTION 2 is an improvement, with lower maintenance, a further step in energy efficiency and can
potentially have a greater integration with the breathing wall and as a tyupical office system will support
resale value for an office application.
OPTION 3 is created to address all of the key issues established with TRCA. It optimizes efficiency for
rooftop equipment and the heating system and positively addresses all other key issues, at less than a
10% premium over Option 2. Energy cost savings from this system will also accrue through time.
We recommend Option 3
Other Issues and Recommendations
1. Include the ceiling tile replacement budget in the HVAC upgrade. This will allow a properly
coordinated program under control of one contractor integrated with the work of installing piping,
ductwork chances in the ceiling void and radiant panels detailed at the office perimeter.
Approximately 120,000 has been carried for ceiling work and radiant panel ceiling work in these
budgets.
2. The attached table shows budget breakdowns for the options. The tables illustrate it is more cost
effective to do the heating and VAC projects together and a phased sequence within one contract
can potentially be developed to span year end 2002 and 2003 budget availability (note pricing of
separating heating and VAC project do not include contingency for smaller projects, this would
be carried at 9% at this stage).
Page 2
408
5 SHOREHAM DRIVE - HVAC UPGRADES
OUR FILE NO: 02 -1053
24 JULY 2002
DESIGN OPTIONS AND CONSTRUCTION BUDGET ESTIMATES
Description
Construction Budget
Estimates'
1. Heating System
as separate
project
2. VAC System as
separate project
$325,0002 $330,000
1+2 Total as separate
projects
3. Cost combining
pro ect as single
pro ect with phase
installation
Option 1
Replace existing
multizones with same
in current technology
and new conventional
efficiency heating
boiler with radiant
panels for perimeter
heating
$210,000
$535,000
$499,000
4. Continency at $37,425
7.5%
5. Single phased $536,425
project Concept
stage construction
cost estimate
Option 2
Replace existing
multizones with new
single gas fired,
roofmounted VAV unit
and replace heating
system with
conventional efficiency
boiler with radiant
panels for perimeter
heating
Option 3
Replace existing
multizones with new
single fluid coil
heating /Evap cooler
rooftop unit and
integrated high
efficiency boiler
system with radiant
panels for perimeter
heating.
$210,000 Not applicable
because of integration
of heating system with
rooftop heating
requires single project
$540,000 N/A
$510,000 $555,000
$38,250
$548,250
$41,625
$596,625
Budgets represent knowledge at concept design stage.
$10,000 is carried as a provision for structural reinforcement on expansion roof for multizone
replacement Option 1
a Construction costs estimates do not include professional engineering fees.
The budget for the system selected by T.R.C.A. will be checked again at 90% design stage when more
detailed design information will be resolved.
Page 3
409
5 SHOREHAM DRIVE - HVAC UPGRADES
OUR FILE NO: 02 -1053
24 JULY 2002
TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Mitchell-Partnership (TMP) was retained by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to
provide design and construction phase inspection services for HVAC upgrades at the 5 Shoreham Drive
Facility. This report is provided to clarify the scope of work and budget required to produce necessary
upgrades to the HVAC and related systems.
BACKGROUND
From the TRCA request for proposal and information provided and issues discussed in the project kick
off meeting TMP have distilled the following key issues in establishing the design scope.
1. The TRCA operating under a renewable resource mandate are looking to design engineers to
develop HVAC retrofit solutions to incorporate "Green" design principles and technologies. The
mechanical engineering response to this mandate is to propose energy efficient systems and
longer life cycle products reasonably applied to the constraints of the existing building
architecture and to represent value as a balance of capital cost versus life cycle performance.
2. The existing rooftop HVAC equipment is beyond its life cycle and deficient in performance by
virtue of age and condition.
3. The existing boiler plant is also at the end of its fife cycle and since the related piping systems
were operating without a chemical treatment system (to arrest corrosion) the pipe distribution
system which has had leaks is suspect for a future fife cycle.
4. The TRCA will be adding replacement ceiling tiles and new carpet to the facility to improve
aesthetic conditions. Timing these improvements to lessen the risk of damage as well as aid the
installation of heating piping in the ceiling voids is important.
5. The opportunity to optimize the energy efficiency of the HVAC system and minimize total
construction cost will likely be to incorporate as much of these needs in a single contract or
phased but continuous contract spanning two TRCA business years.
6. Provide a system which will optimize resale value of the building.
7. Provide a VAC infrastructure which can be best interfaced with the future "breathing wall"
proposal
Page 4
410
5 SHOREHAM DRIVE - HVAC UPGRADES
OUR FILE NO: 02 -1053
24 JULY 2002
DESIGN OPTIONS
Two main design ventilation and air condition (VAC) options were presented during the meeting of July 9,
2002 with TRCA. These are:
1. Replace existing multizone units with new multizone units meeting current ASHRAE 90.1 energy
efficiency standards.
2. Provide a single new larger VAV rooftop unit to serve the entire building.
The upgrade of the heating system is incorporated with each of these options. The extent, type and
efficiency and cost effectiveness of the heating systems depends on whether or not it is incorporated as
an integral part of the main ventilation and air conditioning system (VAC) or independently. This is
described in more detail in the next section.
HEATING SYSTEM
The existing heating system is made up of a boiler, pumps, distribution piping, heating devices (Fin tube
radiators at the perimeter and unit heaters) as well as some control valves and minimal controls. Criteria
considered in determining a design direction for a heating system for 5 Shoreham Drive include:
1. Energy efficiency /environmentally conscious design
2. Optimize the above as part of the VAC solution
3. Life cycle
4. Minimize waste cost for cut patch and repair associated with existing vertical pipe services down
in chases behind drywall to serve perimeter radiators.
These criteria provided direction for the following design features
• Boilers
Recommend a high efficiency low emission combustion boiler/
> Recommended high efficiency boilers utilize flue gas condensation technology with
potential efficiencies over 95% (see attached).
> Conventional lower cost boilers operate generally around 80% efficiency.
Integrate the high efficiency boiler heating capability to not only do the building envelope heating
but also heat ventilation air in the air handling unit in a way to lower return temperature to the
boiler and enhance the condensing effect and efficiency.
Page 5
411
5 SHOREHAM DRIVE - HVAC UPGRADES
OUR FILE NO: 02 -1053
24 JULY 2002
This is a key feature in the beneficial integrated approach of the VAC system with the heating
system. Lower cost alternatives would utilize gas fired heat for the rooftop unit ventilation air and
the opportunity to enhance the condensing effect and efficiency of the high efficiency boiler
would be lost, in which case reverting to a lower cost 80% to 85% efficient boiler may be more
cost effective.
• New Distribution Piping, Pumping, Chemical Treatment, DDC Controls.
All of these would be provided as part of the design solution. Certainly there would be some
controls cost savings for the heating system to be done as part of a single package.
• Heating Terminals
In order to replace existing fin tube heating cabinets and remove and replace existing vertical
pipe risers behind drywall considerable expense would occur. A proven and popular alternative
to achieve a high standard of heating comfort would be to incorporate hot water radiant ceiling
heating panels at the perimeter of the building to provide envelope heating. The vertical piping
can then be abandoned and its removal, replacement, patch and repair costs applied beneficially
to the new installation. The fan tube, cabinets and radiators can be removed with minor patch
and repair costs and this space can be regained to useable area.
We propose that the work on the ceiling to integrate the radiant panels and the hot water piping
removal and replacement work in the ceiling void and replacement of existing ceiling tiles with
new should be part of the same contract to allow appropriate site coordination under control of a
single contractor. Ceiling tile replacement budget may be best served therefore by being
incorporated into the HVAC upgrade project.
Page 6
412
5 SHOREHAM DRIVE - HVAC UPGRADES
OUR FILE NO: 02 -1053
24 JULY 2002
VAC OPTIONS
Options include ECMS /DDC upgrade. Options are based on custom rooftop equipment with longer fife
cycle.
Replace Existing Multizones
3 units to match existing capacity with new temperature sensor control for each zone. They would be
equipped with options and based on custom equipment with long life cycle. The units would be more
efficiency than past generation equipment.
The 5 Shoreham Drive building addition roof supporting a single unit is of a lighter construction and lower
capacity structure than the original structure. Potentially (subject to more detailed analysis) this roof
would require more reinforcement either to address the replacement units being with more features and
at high weight and /or to meet current code snowload parameters.
Other issues with respect to retaining this type of system are:
1. It is not typical of modern office VAC design and as therefore less appealing in resale.
2. Zone changes requiring air volume quantity change and location are less flexible and more
costly.
3. There are 3 units to maintain.
New Single Variable Air Volume (VAV) Unit to Serve Entire Building (2 Options)
VAV systems are one of the more prominent and accepted methods to apply air conditioning and
ventilation to office buildings.
This option will replace the 3 existing units with a single large unit mounted on the original building roof
behind the parapet. Preliminary structural investigation indicates that this roof area was designed for a
significant snow load and it appears structurally viable without significant cost.
Roof mounted ductwork would extend to the existing unit connection points and within the building sheet
metal alteration would allow connection of variable air volume (VAV) boxes to provide control over current
zoning.
The benefits of this system:
1. Lower maintenance cost on a single unit.
2. Lower energy costs taking advantage of both variable volume technology an the cooling load
diversity throughout the entire floorplate.
Page 7
413
5 SHOREHAM DRIVE - HVAC UPGRADES
OUR FILE NO: 02-1053
24 JULY 2002
3. Lower cost and more flexibility to add future individual cooling zones.
4. Is a typical proven and accepted type of office system and a positive building characteristic for
resale.
5. The unit can be cost effectively equipped with evaporative cooling feature which will further
improve energy efficiency above the levels for tapped rooftop equipment.
6. This unit type can be equipped with an evaporative cooling system to enhance the energy
efficiency of the overall cooling system by nearly 30% above conventional dry cooling used on
roof top units.
This VAV system option can be equipped with either gas fired heating section option or fluid coil heating
section option integrated into a high efficiency boiler system. These two features divide this option into
two distinct sub - options. The latter being more efficient and requiring integration with the boiler plant in
one construction project.
Page 8
414
n
a 4•
1
•
Vertomat
Vertornat
High efficiency~, gas -firad condensing boiler
636 to 3361 Mai
�._
Nigh efficiency, gas -fired condensing boiler
with 1n0x- Crossa) heat exchanger surfaces
in conosion- resistant stainless steel
Heating input: 638 to 3361 MBH
,rte'
Inox- Crossal heat transfer surface — verde. *y oriented, of
corrosion- resistant stainless steel — for high operational
reliability and a long aarvire Ufe.
at how- emission combustion —with emission values within and
well below the iirnils set by the requirements of the German
environmental emblem "Blue Angel ", the Swiss Clean Air
Regulations, California Regulations, end the new environmental
pertormarrce standards for toiler emissions, established by the
CCME, effective 1904.
.,,M1r • Saves energy and preserves the environment with efficiencies
in excess of 95% (depending an the system) through Mtensrlre
flue gas condensation. The new, highly efficient Max-Crone'
heating surfaces ensure optimum heat transfer to the boiler
water. The flue gas temperature is only approximately 18'F
10'C above the baler return temperature.
N Easy transport into boiler moms due to narrow design and low
weight — an important factor in modernizing the boiler room.
et Safe heat transfer ensured by wile dimension water wails and
large water content
ineariltwram 8.3 - 5
415
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES. #B94/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
• or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.1 - 8.1.21, inclusive, and 8.1.40 - 8.1.52, Inclusive), which are listed below:
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.1 JASVIR DHAMI
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Concession 8 Lot 12, Plan M-350, (18
Rosegarden Drive), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Jasvir Dhami.
The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in order to
accommodate the construction of a 9000 square foot residential dwelling, a septic bed,
swimming pool, and a future tennis court at 18 Rosegarden Drive, Brampton.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site plan for proposed residence, pool area, septic bed and future tennis court at 18
Rosegarden Drive, signed B.R. Whitehead, P. Eng., dated June 17, 2002. Redline
revised (by TRCA July 15, 2002) to show slit fencing to be established for the duration
of construction, a note stating that all excess fill will be removed, and a minimum 10
metre setback between the top of bank/rear lot line and the future tennis court.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
416
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in order to
accommodate the construction of a 9000 square foot residential dwelling, a septic bed, a
swimming pool and a future tennis court at 18 Rosegarden Drive, Brampton. The subject
property is a vacant existing lot of record that was part of an approved residential subdivision.
On July 11, 2002, TRCA staff met with the applicants agent and confirmed that the rear lot line
of the property is consistent with the stable top of bank. The proposed works are also
consistent with other existing development along the corridor reach.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is located outside of the Regional Storm floodplain and therefore will not
affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
As per redline revisions to the site plan, sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed
and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with this project and the proposed
works will not impact any significant natural features. The subject property is located entirely
on tableland and, as per redline revisions to the site plan, the future tennis court and septic bed
will be set back 10 metres from the stable top of bank.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are in compliance with Section 4.2.2 (G) Development and
Redevelopment / Intensification within Non - Established Communities / Highly Urbanized Areas
- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33368
Report Prepared by: Maria Flores, extension 5244
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: July 12, 2002
CITY OF PICKERING
8.1.2 WILLIAM T. PERKS
Application #: 282/02/BRAM
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10, Concession 8, (2560 Concession 8),
in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned
by William T. Perks.
The purpose is to undertake grading works within a Fill Regulated Area associated with Duffins
Creek to reestablish previously existing grades.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
417
• Site Plan, Construction Details, prepared by the applicant, dated April 26, 2002,
received May 1, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
Many years ago, a previous landowner undertook some grading works within the Fill
Regulated Area in order to create a level area for the tennis court constructed within the
floodplain of Duffins Creek. In the process, the removed soil was deposited in an area
approximately 15 to 50 metres from the watercourse and some rough grading work
undertaken. The tennis court has since been removed and the site has regenerated with native
grasses which the present owner cuts with a tractor. Water tends to pool and pond in this
area, due to the depression caused by the removed fill, thus restricting the maintenance of this
area in the Spring. The,landowner proposes to undertake some grading works to reestablish
the previous grades. The area will then be left to seed itself and become a more naturalized
area. There will be no imported fill.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works will involve the regrading of material previously excavated and placed
within the floodplain area. The control and storage of floodwaters will therefore, not be
affected.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from these works as they are located a minimum 15 metres from
Duffins Creek, with a heavily vegetated buffer between the work area and the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located within a previously disturbed portion of the Regional Storm
Floodplain of Duffins Creek and entirely outside of the riparian zone associated with the
watercourse. There are no significant resource features on site, and no fisheries concerns
associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33185
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 8, 2002
418
Application #: 177/02 /PICK
CITY OF TORONTO (EAST YORK COMMUNITY)
8.1.3 CHARLES WHYTE
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Concession 3 Lot 21, Plan 3618, (182
Parkview Hill Crescent), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area),
Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Charles Whyte.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Don
River to facilitate the installation of an inground swimming pool and spa.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Landscape Plan submitted by applicant, date received July 11, 2002.
• Letter of Intent by applicant, dated July 12, 2002, date received July 12, 2002,
confirming that all excess excavated material will be removed from the site.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the installation of
an inground swimming pool and spa in the rear yard of the residence, being situated
approximately 15 metres from the top of bank of the valley slope associated with the East Don
River.
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located outside the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the proposed
works will have no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood water.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the proposed works and the top of valley slope in order to
prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on the tableland portion of the rear yard and are consistent
with existing development in the corridor reach. The pool and spa will maintain a minimum
setback of 15 metres from the valley slope which has recently been reshaped and stabilized
through a project coordinated with the TRCA and the City of Toronto. Hence, there are no
geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the project. TRCA staff has promoted the
disconnection of the downspouts of the house from the storm sewer.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
419
CFN: 33362
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 12, 2002
Application #: 278/02/TOR
8.1.4 YANNI PSARAKIS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 27, Plan 3539, (110 Parkview Hill
Crescent), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Yanni Psarakis.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of the existing attached garage and the construction of a new attached garage, the
construction of a ground floor addition onto the east side of the existing residence, a second
storey addition above the existing house and new ground floor additions, and a new concrete
porch onto the rear (north side) of the house.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -Ilne Revised Site Plan, First Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan, Rear & East Side
Elevations, Cross - Section A -A and B -B, Concrete Porch and Wood Deck & Details,
Detail 'A', Notes & General Notes, Drawing Nos. A, Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, & A8,
prepared by Hadcon Design, date received June 25, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of thefollowing information:
Proposal:
The subject property is traversed at the rear by a valley slope associated with the East Don
River. The owner proposes to remove the existing single car attached garage and construct a
new garage in basically the same location, being the southeast corner of the house. The
proposed works also include the construction of a ground floor addition behind the new
garage, onto the northeast corner of the house, such that the new addition will be aligned with
the rear wall of the existing residence. A second storey addition will be constructed over the
existing house and the new ground floor additions. A new concrete porch, measuring
approximately 4 metres wide by 10 metres long will be constructed onto the.rear (north side) of
the house, resulting in the house extending another 4 metres closer to the valley slope, but
maintaining a minimum 12 metre setback from the top of bank.
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located outside the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River, therefore
the proposed works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment control fence will be installed between the proposed works and the top of bank in
order to prevent sediment from entering any watercourse.
420
Conservation of Land:
The proposed rear porch will result in the house being 4 metres closer to the valley slope,
however a 12 metre setback from the top of bank will be maintained. There are no
geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the proposed works, which are consistent
with existing development in the corridor reach. There are no significant resources features on
the site. TRCA staff has promoted the disconnection of the downspouts for the house from the
storm sewer.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33329
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 25, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
- of the Authority's Valley
Application #: 251/02/TOR
8.1.5 DAVID AND PATRICIA PSUTKA
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 15, Plan 3939, (53 Valecrest Drive), in
the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed
as located on the property owned by David and Patricia Psutka.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to
facilitate the construction of two small additions onto the front of the existing residence.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Drawing No. Al, prepared by Culmone & Associates Ltd., dated December
12, 2001, date received June 24, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the excavation and replacement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the
Humber River to facilitate the construction of two small additions onto the front (west side) of
the residence in order to extend and increase the size of the diningroom and kitchen areas by
approximately 19 sq. metres (200 sq. ft). A slope feature exists on both the north and east
sides of the residence. While the proposed additions will maintain a 3 metre and 10 metre
setback from the top of bank respectively, they will not encroach any closer to the top of bank
than the existing residence. TRCA staff has promoted the disconnection of the downspouts of
the house from the storm sewer.
421
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located above the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the proposed
works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are not expected to result in sedimentation of any watercourse as the
additions are located more than 50 metres from a small tributary of the Humber River.
Conservation of Land:
The works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach and are not expected
to impact on any significant resource features as they are located above the top of bank and
maintain appropriate setbacks. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated
with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.2.2(C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33327
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 25, 2002
Application #: 252/02/TOR
8.1.6 FRANK BAXTER
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (1 Lake Crescent),
in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed
as located on the property owned by Frank Baxter.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated to facilitate the demolition of the
existing single - family residence and the construction of a new house, as well as the
construction of a new armour stone seawall behind the existing concrete shoreline revetment.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan and Sections, Sheet No. 1, prepared by Shoreplan Engineering Limited,
dated June 18, 2002, date received June 24, 2002.
f
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
422
Proposal:
The proposal involves the demolition of the existing home and the construction of a new larger
residence, in closer proximity to the Lake Ontario shoreline, being situated partially within the
Fill Regulated Area associated with the waterfront, but entirely above the Regulatory Flood
level. The shoreline is currently protected by concrete revetment along the southerly side and
a concrete retaining wall along a portion of the west side, adjacent to the neighbour's
residential property. Behind the revetment is an asphalt pad which is badly damaged by wave
action and a secondary concrete wall. The crest of the revetment is at approximately 77.2
metres while the secondary wall reaches a top elevation of approximately 77.6 metres.
Shoreplan Engineering has completed a wave uprush assessment for the site and has
calculated that during a 1 in 100 Year design storm, wave uprush would reach an elevation of
approximately 78.8 metres, thus overtopping the existing shoreline revetment. The crest of the
new proposed armour stone seawall will be set at 78.8 metres and any spray or spills behind
the armour stone wall will be accommodated by the proposed rip rap splash pad. Clean fill
material will be placed behind the splash pad, separated by geotextile, and graded at a
minimum 2% slope to maintain site drainage, and then stabilized with top soil and sod.
Control of Flooding:
Based on the proposed design, the back side of the rip rap pad will be the limit of the wave
uprush zone and therefore the limit of the flooding hazard as defined by the Provincial Policy
Statement. The proposed modified structure will offer greater protection than the existing
shoreline protection and will provide suitable protection capable of withstanding the design
storm.
Pollution:
Sediment control measures will be implemented on the site to prevent sedimentation of the
lake.
Conservation of Land:
The new house will replace the existing residence, which will be offered greater protection from
the impacts of Lake Ontario flooding and shoreline hazards by the proposed new seawall. The
new seawall will tie into the existing shoreline protection on the neighbouring properties on
either side. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works and there
are no fisheries issues associated with the project, as no work will occur within the lake itself.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(D) - Replacement Structures - and Section
4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33326
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 25, 2002
423
Application #: 253/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO (MIDTOWN COMMUNITY)
8.1.7 CHRISTINE AND DAVID SANDERSON
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 33, Plan 2405,
(82 Donwoods Drive), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area),
Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Christine and David
Sanderson.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of
an inground swimming pool, spa, and landscaping works in the rear yard, being partially within
the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area
(SPA).
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan and Sections prepared by Juergen Partridge Limited, dated June 27, 2002,
date received July 2, 2002.
• Retaining Wall Details, prepared by Unilock, Drawing 3 of 4, and Site Photos,
submitted by Juergen Partridge Limited, date received July 2, 2002.
• Letter of Intent dated June 28, 2002, prepared by Juergen Partridge Limited, date
received July 2, 2002, confirming that all excess excavated material will be removed
from the site.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed, by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of
an inground swimming pool, spa, and landscaping works in the rear yard, being partially within
the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area
(SPA).
Control of Flooding:
The proposed pool will be situated above the 350 Year Storm flood level and all excess fill will
be removed from the site. Therefore, the proposed works are not expected to impact on the
storage or conveyance of flood water.
Pollution:
A sediment control fence is to be erected between the proposed works and the watercourse
prior to commencement and will remain in place until the works have been completed and any
exposed areas have been stabilized.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach and there
are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the project. Authority staff have
recommended to the applicant that the house downspouts be disconnected from the municipal
storm sewer.
424
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(E)- Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33183
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 8, 2002
Application #: 176/02/TOR
8.1.8 IAN RICHARD
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 3,4,5, Plan
2773, Part Lot 6, Plan 2773, (10 St. Margaret's Drive), in the City of Toronto (Midtown
Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Ian Richard.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of an existing single family dwelling and detached garage, and the construction of a new larger
home and inground pool, being partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River
(Hogg's Hollow Special Policy Area).
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• RED -LINE REVISED Construction Notes /Site Plan /Key Plan, Sediment Control Details,
Basement, Ground Floor, Second Floor Plans, Front, Rear, Side and Left Elevations,
Drawing Nos. Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, and A6, prepared by Richard Wengle Architect Inc.,
dated July 2002, date received July 10, 2002.
• Letter confirming House Safety against Regional Flood Depths and Velocities,
prepared by Kazdan and LaIji Ltd. Structural Engineers, dated July 9, 2002, received
July 16, 2002.
• Letter of Intent prepared by Scottsdale Contracting Inc., dated July 9, 2002, date
received July 10, 2002, confirming that all excess material will be removed from the
site.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the
demolition of an existing single family dwelling and garage, and the construction of a new
larger home and inground pool, being partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don
River and within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). The proposed new home will be
constructed a minimum of 19 metres (62 feet) from the Don River watercourse, and will require
minimal changes to grade or disturbance of vegetation.
425
Control of Flooding:
The new home will be dry floodproofed to the Regional Storm Flood level, while the garage will
be floodproofed to the level of the 350 year storm event.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be installed during the construction process in order to prevent
. sediment from reaching the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The new house and pool will maintain a minimum 19 metre (62 foot) setback from the Don
River and is consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. There are no sicnificant
resource features on site, and the proposed works will maintain grades. There are no fsheries
or geotechnical issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1. - Development and Re- development within
Established Communities (Two Zone /Special Policy) Areas - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33296
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 17, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 234/02/TOR
8.1.9 CITY OF TORONTO
To place fill within a regulated area on (Alamosa Park), in the City of Toronto (North
York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property
owned by The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm
Floodplain associated with the Don River, in order to facilitate the demolition and
reconstruction of three existing tennis courts.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Demolition and Removal Plan, Layout and Grading Plan, prepared by Fleisher Ridout
Partnership Ltd. dated June 2002, received July 3, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
426
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm
floodplain associated with the Don River, in order to facilitate the demolition and reconstruction
of three existing tennis courts. There will be no increase in the size of the facility, and no
changes to grades. The Tennis courts are located on flat floodplain, a distance of 50 metres
(164 feet), from the watercourse, and 30 meters (98 feet) from the toe of slope.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed structure is generally flat and will not affect the storage capacity or conveyance
of floodwaters.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be installed and maintained throughout the construction process in order to
prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will be limited to the area of the existing development. There will be no
increase in footprint, or changes to grades. There are no significant resource features on the
site, and no fisheries issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. The property
is owned by the TRCA and under management agreement with the City of Toronto.
CFN: 33354
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 10, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY)
Application #: 273/02/TOR
8.1.10 SCARBORO GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10, Concession D , Part Lot 15, 17, 18,
Concession D , (321 Scarborough Golf Club Road), in the City of Toronto
(Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on
the property owned by Scarboro Golf & Country Club.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Highland Creek to
facilitate the relocation of an existing cart path.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan and Cart Path Relocation Concept Plan at Hole #8, prepared by Scarboro
Golf & Country Club, date received June 27, 2002.
427
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to relocate a 45 metre section of the existing cart path which allows access
from the upper fairway at hole #8, being.situated on tableland, to the lower fairway situated at
the toe of slope, adjacent to Highland Creek. The existing cart path is located in close
proximity to the upper fairway, directly in the landing area from.the tee off and causing an
nterference for golfers. The proposed relocation of the cart path will move it off the playing
area. In addition, the existing cart path is presently too steep and for safety purposes, the new
cart path will be constructed at a more gentle slope of approximately 15 to 20% grade,
involving some minor cutting into the slope at the upper portion and placement of this removed
fill at the lower end, measuring approximately 40 cubic metres in total.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed grading changes are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain,
therefore the storage and conveyance of flood water will not be impacted.
Pollution:
A sediment erosion control fence will be located between the proposed works and the
watercourse in order to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The existing cart path traverses the valley slope which is presently vegetated with sumac. The
relocated portion of the cart path will also traverse the slope and will involve some regrading to
achieve a more gentle 15 to 20% grade for the golf carts and some vegetation removal. As a
result, woody plant material will be replanted on the disturbed areas and the site restored. The
proposed works are located outside of the riparian zone associated with Highland Creek and
will not impact on any significant resource features. There are no slope stability /geotechnical
issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33352
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 9, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 267/02/TOR
8.1.11 BLOCK 32 LANDOWNERS GROUP
To alter a waterway on Lot 19, Concession 5, (Weston Road /Major MacKenzie
Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Olga Wayda.
428
The purpose is to alter a tributary watercourse of the Don River, construct a concrete sewer
and "headwater" stormwater management pond to allow for the development of a component
of the Vellore Village "District Centre" as defined within the City of Vaughan Official Plan.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan and Profile, Weston Road /Hawston Road, Concrete Storm Sewer, Drawings PP -1,
PP -2 and PP -3, Project 2000 -2206, prepared by Schaeffer's Consulting Engineers,
dated March 2002.
• Plan and Profile, Valley Lowering and Culvert Improvements, Drawings PP -5, PP -6,
PP -7, PP -8 and PP -9, Project 96 -E -1869, prepared by Schaeffer's Consulting
Engineers, dated October 2001, revised to June 17th, 2002.
• S.W.M. Channel Cross Sections 41-45 and 46 -48, Drawings SWM -33N and SWM -34N,
Project 96 -E -1869, prepared by Schaeffer's Consulting Engineers, dated October
2001, revised to June 14th, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to enclose a portion of a tributary watercourse of the Don River, and to
construct a headwater stormwater management facility to connect to an existing downstream
channelized watercourse within the Vellore Village neighbourhood in the City of Vaughan.
Authority staff have had extensive dealings with the review and approval of the comprehensive
planning strategy for the development of lands bounded by Major MacKenzie Drive, Rutherford
Road, Weston Road and Highway #400, commonly referred to as the Vellore Woods
Community (Block 32 West). Through the development of the Vellore Woods community in
the late 1990's, the invert of the stream corridor downstream of the subject property was
lowered in conjunction with a major reconstruction of the valley system using natural channel
design principles, which was reviewed and approved by the Authority through the issuance of
Permit C- 99106. The extent of this reach begins immediately downstream of the-property
(approximately 400m south -east from Major Mackenzie Drive and Weston Road) to Highway
#400. The naturalized channel bisects two large stormwater management facilities at Highway
#400 and has been incorporated into City parkland. The result was an improvement to both
terrestrial and aquatic habitat conditions, creating fish habitat where none had previously
existed.
Within Official Plan Amendment 600, the City of Vaughan has identified the "four- corners" of
Weston Road and Major MacKenzie Drive as the Vellore Village "District Centre ", which seek to
provide for the community's primary focus of major retail, office, commercial and residential
development. As part of the Block 32 West review, the lands subject to this application were
identified as a Special Study Area, in part a reflection of the City's need to refine the District
Centre requirements, and in part owing to a deferral with respect to the treatment of this
watercourse, as it bisects these lands.
429
The stream corridor subject to this application is significantly degraded through current and
historical agricultural practices. Immediately upstream of the subject lands (north of Major
Mackenzie Drive) the tributary exhibits no defined channel and is characterized as an
agricultural swale traversing heavily cultivated.and disturbed lands. This application_ has been
reviewed in conjunction with the currently on -going Block Plan /MESP review of the lands to the
north (Block 33 West) and to the north -west (Block 40).
The applicants have presented to the City of Vaughan their applications for commercial and
medium density residential developments in this study area which are currently under appeal
to the Ontario Municipal Board. At issue are matters of density and design with respect to the
policies and provisions of OPA 600, and the District Centre Study. While many of these
planning matters between the City, the Region of York and the applicants are currently being
resolved, the TRCA is not a party to this hearing. Given that the °District Centre° development
is envisioned to be an intensively developed urbanized place, the City Commissioner of
Planning has requested Authority staff to consider the enclosure of the remaining reach of this
tributary to allow for the final conceptual and detailed studies to progress.
On this basis, Authority staff have issued Conditions of Approval for the related Official Plan,
Re- Zoning and Plan of Subdivision applications subject to full permit approvals being acquired.
As the tributary reach subject to this application is ill- defined and highly disturbed with no
natural habit features, staff have proceeded to review detailed technical submissions to
address a number of engineering requirements to ensure the proper treatment of upstream
flows and an appropriate transition facility (stormwater pond) which shall provide the open
headwater of the existing downstream channel. In staffs joint review of the Vellore Village
Master Environmental.Servicing Plan (MESP), the Ministry of Natural Resources and the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans have not expressed any additional interests with the
treatment of this remaining tributary reach, although these agencies were extensively involved
with the review and approval of the downstream natural channel construction.
Notwithstanding, staff have required appropriate off -site enhancement and compensation
measures be made at the expense of the developing groups to support this application.
Control of Flooding:
Detailed technical submissions have prepared to the satisfaction of Authority staff adequately
addressing all drainage matters and riparian storage requirements. There will be no impacts to
the control of flooding downstream of the proposed works.
Pollution:
All appropriate sediment controls will be installed to prevent downstream sedimentation of the
watercourse and works will be constructed in the dry.
Conservation of Land:
The tributary reach contains no fish habitat and is in a highly degraded state with no riparian
corridor or natural habitat value. Notwithstanding, as part of this review staff have required that
appropriate compensation to improve off -site conditions be provided. The applicants have
committed to a monetary contribution of which funds will be applied to the enhancement of the
downstream natural channel and other habitat enhancement opportunities where deemed
appropriate.
430
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 3.3 - Policies and Procedures for Identifying
Watercourses and Alterations, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program policies.
CFN: 33219
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: May 17, 2002
Application #: 193 /02/VAUG
8.1.12 CITY OF VAUGHAN
To alter a waterway on Lot 15, Concession 3, (Rutherford Road, Westburne Drive to
Confederation Parkway), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on
the property owned by City of Vaughan.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse by extending an existing culvert and construction of a
pedestrian bridge to facilitate construction of sidewalk access to the Rutherford GO Transit
station, City of Vaughan.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Rutherford Road (Sidewalk Construction), Drawing 5, Project T02 -007, dated May
2002, revised to June 21, 2002.
• Rutherford Road (Sidewalk Construction), Drawing 6, Project T02 -007, dated May
2002, revised to June 21, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to extend an existing culvert of an intermittent Don River tributary running
under Rutherford Road to facilitate the construction of a sidewalk and a new culvert for a
pedestrian bridge over the watercourse to allow for better access to the Rutherford GO Transit
station. The Authority has previously issued permit approvals for the alteration of this tributary
for the purpose of constructing this station, which has now been completed. The culvert
extension will be 9.0 metres and the new culvert will be 13.9m long. Both culverts will extend
into existing channelized sections of the watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no changes to existing grades and existing culvert sizes will be matched.
Accordingly, there will be no impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment controls will be installed where appropriate and all works are to be conducted in the
dry to prevent sedimentation within the watercourse.
431
Conservation of Land:
Authority staff have identified no fisheries issues with this reach as the watercourse does not
provide for fish habitat. Restoration of this reach by native species plantings is to be
conducted in accordance with the approved plans for the prior permit approval. All disturbed
areas for this proposal are to be immediately stabilized upon completion of construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33333
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For Information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: June 26, 2002
Application #: 257 /02NAUG
8.1.13 THE CITY OF VAUGHAN
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 6, 7, Concession 7, (Nort Johnston Park -
between Woodbridge Avenue and Highway 7), in the City of Vaughan, Humber
River Watershed as located on the property owned by The Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to place fill and construct within the fioodplain and Regulated Area of the
Humber River to facilitate the construction of a bocce court, pedestrian trail construction and
other minor improvements to Nort Johnston Park, City of Vaughan.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Park Upgrades, Drawing L1, prepared by Landscape Planning Limited, Project
2002 -05, dated May 2002.
• Park Upgrades, Details, Drawing L2, prepared by Landscape Planning Limited, Project
2002 -05, dated June 2, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The.proposal is to conduct Dark upgrades within Nort Johnston Park in the Woodbridge Core,
which include the construct on of a bocce' court, trail upgrades and new trail construct on and
accessibility ramps, the installation of newpark benches, and site grading associated with
these works. Trail upgrades will include the upgrading of an existing crushed stone pathway to
asphalt, and new construction of a connecting trail and accessibility ramps. The single bocce
court will be situated in a currently disturbed area of the park and all new works will maintain
the existing riparian zone adjacent to the channel bank.
432
Control of Flooding:
There will be negligible structural placement (i.e. park benches) and there will be no changes
to existing grades. Accordingly, there will be no impacts to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be installed to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no impacts to existing vegetation with the exception of a small area of towards the
south end of the new trail construction. Removal of low quality vegetation is required to
facilitate a 3.0m path clearance on either side, and is necessary to address ongoing safety and
crime prevention issues. The remainder of the trail and bocce court construction will occur in
currently manicured areas. All high quality vegetation is to be maintained and protected with
tree hording, where necessary. Native tree replantings are included in the proposal and all
disturbed areas are to be immediately stabilized upon completion of construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.1.2, New Resource Based Uses, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33349
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: July 5, 2002
TOWN OF CALEDON
Application #: 266 /02/VAUG
8.1.14 CHRIS AND SHESHONA DUFF
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 20, Plan
BOL -7, (189 King Street East), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Chris and Sheshona Duff.
The purpose is to place fill material within the Regional Storm Floodplain, associated with the
Bolton Special Policy Area of the Humber River and located within the Fill Regulated Area, to
accommodate the construction of an above ground swimming pool and deck at 189 King
Street East, Bolton.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan of Survey of Part of Lot 20, Block 1, Registered Plan BOL -7, Town of Caledon,
Regional Municipality of Peel, labelled 189 King St. E., received by TRCA June 25,
2002.
• Site Plan for above ground pool and deck at 189 King St. E., Caledon, received by
TRCA June 25, 2002.
433
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill material within the Regional Storm floodplain of the Humber River,
located within the Fill Regulated Area, to accommodate the construction of an above ground
swimming pool and deck. The subject property is located within the Bolton Special Policy Area
(SPA) which allows for development within the floodplain provided it meets SPA criteria. The
proposed works meet all applicable SPA criteria.
Control of Flooding:
Impacts to flooding will be minimal as the pool is not very large (6 metre diameter) and will be
located over 80 metres from the watercourse. The proposed deck is floodproofed above the
Regional Storm floodplain elevation.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected as a result of this project.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is located within the developed portion of the Humber River Valley in
Bolton. The proposed swimming pool is consistent with existing development within the
corridor reach and will not affect any significant natural features. There are no geotechnical
issues related to this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B) Development and Redevelopment /
Intensification within Established Communities / Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33339
Report Prepared by: Maria Flores, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: June 28, 2002
Application #: 263/02/CAL
8.1.15 JAY BURSTEIN
To construct in a flood plain on East Half Lot 5, Concession 3, (12830 Gore Road),
in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Jay Burstein.
The purpose is to construct an inground swimming pool within the Regional Storm floodplain
associated with the Humber River at 12830 Gore Road, Caledon.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
434
• Site Plan for proposed pool location at 12830 Gore Road, shown on Plan of
Severance diagram for Part of Lot 5, Concession 3, Town of Caledon, Regional
Municipality of Peel, received by TRCA June 26, 2002. Redline revised, by TRCA July
15, 2002, to show where silt fencing should be established for the duration of
construction and to note that all excess fill should be removed from the site.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating fill material to facilitate the construction of an inground
swimming pool in the Regional Storm floodplain of the Humber River. There is an existing
residential dwelling and tennis court on the subject property which is located within the Fill
Regulated Area.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not significantly affect the storage or conveyance of flood water. The proposed
inground swimming pool is located outside of the hydraulic floodway and will involve the
excavation of fill from the Regional Storm floodplain. All excavated fill will be removed from the
floodplain.
Pollution:
As per redline revisions on the site plan, silt fencing will be installed and maintained during
construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse which is located approximately
87 metres from the proposed works.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on a plateau, adjacent to the existing dwelling, which is clear
of significant vegetation. There are no slope stability /geotechnical concerns associated with
this project and no significant resource features will be impacted.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) Development and Redevelopment /
Intensification Within Non - Established Communities / Highly Urbanized Areas - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33340
Report Prepared by: Maria Flores, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: June 28, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 262/02/CAL
8.1.16 ANGELICO INVESTMENTS INC.
To place fill within a regulated area on Block A , C, Plan 4556, (8551, 8555, 8561
and 8601 Woodbine Avenue at Highway 7), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
435
Watershed as located on the property owned by Angelico Investments Inc..
The purpose is to construct a new retail commercial facility at the flood fringe of the Regional
Storm Floodplain of the Beaver Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Michael Angelo Market Place Commercial Development Plans Drawing No. A1-1A,
Project No. 20077, prepared by Paul Didur Architect Inc., revised as received on July
8th, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to construct a new commercial development consisting of three
buildings on the subject property in a phased development scheme. At this time the applicant
is seeking approval for Phase 1, the re- construction of the existing parking structure within the
Regional Storm Floodplain to service a new grocery store building located beyond the
floodplain. The site is not Fill Regulated. A future phase will involve the construction of
additional buildings on the site, which will require permits from the TRCA. During a Regional
Storm Event it is expected that water would spill onto the site resulting in some passive storage
of flood waters. The site is removed from the watercourse which is channelized at the opposite
corner of the intersection and is currently occupied by an existing commercial building and
parking facility. The site has been designated for the proposed expansion by the Town of
Markham. This development is consistent with existing development within the flood fringe of
the Regional Storm Floodplain at this intersection including the existing Hyundai Plant and the
Woodbine and 7 Commercial Center.
Control of Flooding:
Studies conducted by the applicant and re- assessed by TRCA engineering staff have
confirmed that the reconfiguration of the existing parking lot will have no measurable effect on
the control of flooding. The works are only subject to flooding at extreme storm events beyond
the 100 year storm. The proposed structure will be floodproofed to the Regional Storm
elevation.
Pollution:
The work are not adjacent to the watercourse which flows at the opposite corner of the
intersection and is within two culvert crossings of Highway 7 and Woodbine Avenue. Fencing
will be erected at the perimeter of the site during construction.
Conservation of Land:
There is an existing building and associated parking facility on the subject lands which will be
removed to accommodate the proposed development. There are no natural features on the
subject lands.
436
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.2 - Redevelopment within Highly Urbanized Areas, of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33021
Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: March 14, 2002
Application #: 110/02 /MARK
8.1.17 JESSAMYN HOLDINGS
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 4, Concession 3 WYS (German Mills
Road), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Jessamyn Holdings.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill for lot grading in conjunction with the development of
residential subdivision 19TM- 99019, within the Fill Regulated Area of the German Mills Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2007 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• General and grading Plan Drawing Nos. GP, ES, GR, Project No. 98 -1313 prepared by
Roberts Bell Engineering Limited, as received on July 13, 2001.
• Landscape, Vegetation Assessment and Preservation Plan, Figure 2, prepared by
Gartner Lee Limited, as revised on May 16th, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and placing fill material as part of the development of
residential subdivision 19TM- 99019. This proposed development, located at the north end of
German Mills Road and immediately east of Settler's Park, was approved, with conditions, by
the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). The OMB conditions included a 10 metre structural
setback for Lots 1, 2, and 6 and 12.2 metres for Lots 3, 4, and 5 from the valley top -of -bank.
The first 2.5 metres of the setback area, adjacent to the top -of -bank, has been reserved as a
conservation buffer zone which the OMB has suggested could possibly be revegetated with
"new plantings ". Staff have promoted this suggestion which will be implemented through this
permit approval. Approximately the western half of the subject lands are located within the Fill
Regulated Area of the German Mills Creek.
Control of Flooding:
No part of the property is situated within the Regional Storm Floodplain; therefore, the control
of flooding will not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
A combination of silt fencing and rock check dams will be installed to impede the overland
migration of construction- generated sediments.
437
Conservation of Land:
The entire subdivision will occur on the tableland portion of the site; the valleylands will be
conveyed to the Town of Markham. Authority staff have reviewed geotechnical studies
completed by two different consultants (one for the GMRA and one for Jessamyn Holdings)
and have accepted the recommendations that the proposed works will not impact the long
term stability of the valley wall, as well as confirming that the proposed dwellings will be•safe
during their assumed life of 100 years. A landscape plan has been provided, detailing how the
aforementioned 2.5 metre conservation buffer zone will be revegetated with native plant
species. No significant resource features will be affected by the proposed works; all filled and
disturbed areas will be revegetated / stabilized following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.1.1 - New Urban Development - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32433
Report Prepared by: George Lela, extension 5342
For•information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: October 23, 2001
Application #: 236 /01 /MARK
8.1.18 STANTEC CONSULTING LIMITED (FORMERLY COSBURN PATTERSON
MATHER LTD.) •
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Part Lot 21, 22, Concession 4, (North East.Corner of Major MacKenzie Drive and
Woodbine Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Grand Life Boulevard Corporation.
The purpose is to alter a waterway and construct within a floodplain to facilitate the
construction of a stormwater management pond, associated outfall structures, and to remove
an existing culvert and driveway within the Rouge River Valley Corridor.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2007 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Stormwater Management Pond Drawings & Details, Drawings 601, 602, 603 and 604,
prepared by Stantec Consulting Limited, Project 20362, revised to June 2002.
• Stormwater Pond Landscape Plan & Details, Drawing SW -1, prepared by The MBTW
Group, dated December 2001, July 4, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking dated June 25, 2002 from Dan Miller, P.Eng, Stantec Consulting
Limited, committing to any required minor revisions to the landscaping plans as
deemed necessary.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
438
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct stormwater management facilities, associated storm outfall
structures, to remove an existing culvert and driveway crossing and to rehabilitate a tributary
reach of the Rouge River, to facilitate servicing and construction of Plan of Subdivision
19TM- 20007, East Cathedral Community, in the Town of Markham. This area has undergone
detailed review of the overall servicing scheme through the East Cathedral Lands Master
Environment Servicing Plan (MESP) which has been previously approved by the Authority. The
construction of two ponds is proposed, one quality and quantity controlling up to the 5 year
design storm, and one quantity only pond, controlling up to the 100 year design storm. The
quantity only pond is an on -line facility which will be controlled by a weir and low flow culvert
which is to be partially buried to allow for fish passage. An existing gravel driveway and
culvert crossing which currently traverses the stream corridor will be removed and rehabilitated
to a natural state. The current application is in conformity to the MESP. The application will
require Authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) for works
constituting a HADD (Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction of fish habitat).
Control of Flooding:
Authority engineering staff have conducted detailed review of technical submissions and are
satisfied that there will be no adverse impacts to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Detailed sediment controls are to be implemented and maintained throughout the duration of
construction. The proposed weir construction will require instream works which are to be
constructed in the dry, utilizing temporary coffer and flow dispersion dams and will involve the
pumping of baseflow around the work area to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All significant vegetation within the stream corridor is to be maintained and the proposal
includes detailed native species restoration of the tributary reach. An existing culvert and
driveway will be removed and restored to a natural condition. Construction is to be completed
during the period of June 15 to March 31 in accordance with fisheries habitat construction
guidelines.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 32887
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: January 30, 2002
439
Application #: 050 /02 /MARK
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
8.1.19 HOVE STREET PROPERTIES LIMITED
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 50, Concession 1 (105 Industrial Road), in the
Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Hove Street Properties Limited.
The purpose is to construct a steel shed to house a spray booth insert outside of an existing
industrial building located within the Regional Storm flood plain.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Spray booth enclosure prepared by Mario Coluccl dated July 15, 2002.
• Proposed spray booth hand drawn onto the drawing Addition to Warehouse 105
Industrial Road, Richmond Hill prepared by Michael M. Kopsa Architect last revised
on October 15, 2001 and received by TRCA on June 28, 2002
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of construction of 48 square metre corrugated steel shed that will house
a spray both insert. The existing building is 1300 square metres. The new building represents
an increase in floor area of 4 % which less than the maximum allowable increase of 50% based
on the Authority's policy for minor additions. The lands are located entirely within the Regional
Storm flood plain of the German Mills Creek. The building is within an established industrial
area-where most of the structures are susceptible to minimal depths and velocities of. flooding.
The flood plain is wide and shallow through this reach.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no measurable impact on the control of flooding. The construction plans include
a concrete slab base that will remove the proposed structure from the Regional Storm flood
plain of the Don River.
Pollution:
No pollution is expected as the proposed construction site is 150 metres from German Mills
Creek, and the amount of disturbance is quite small.
Conservation of Land:
No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. The proposed
construction site is currently a parking lot, and is separated from the creek by a large industrial
building.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Policies.
440
CFN: 33373
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: July 12, 2002
Application #: 284/02/RH
8.1.20 DOUG & MAUREEN LIPPS
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 8, 35 AND PART OF 9, Plan 334, (173 Lakeland
Crescent), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Doug & Maureen Lipps.
The purpose is to excavate fill in order to construct a deck onto the rear of an existing dwelling
within the Fill Regulated Area of the East Humber River (Lake Wilcox) as well as the Oak
Ridges Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Doug and Maureen Lipps - Back and Garden Deck prepared by Marsh -Mode dated
July 23, 1996
• Pier Plan, received by TRCA on July 2, 2002
• Llpps Residence, Back 2 Level Deck prepared by Marsh -Mode dated June 10, 2002
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating fill material as part of the construction of an elevated deck
at the rear of an existing dwelling within the Fill Regulated Area of the East Humber River. The
lot is partially within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, but the house and the proposed
construction is on an island outside of the flood plain. The property is entirely within the Oak
Ridges Special Policy Area in an established residential area.
Control of Flooding:
As the proposed area of construction is outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain, the works
are not expected to impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sedimentation of the lake is not expected as the rear yard is not sloped and works are
considered to be minor in nature.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical issues or significant resources on the site.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (C) - Existing Special Policy Areas - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
441
CFN: 33360
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: July 11, 2002
Application #: 276/02/RH
8.1.21 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 35, Concession 3 EYS
(Gormley Court culvert-west of Highway 404, south of Stouffville Road), in the Town
of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Town of Richmond Hill. •
' The purpose is to reconstruct a structure (rehabilitate existing box culvert ) within a Regional
Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (Berczy Creek) during the coldwater timing window (July
1 to September 15) with a coffer dam method in order to work in the dry. The subject property
is not regulated for fill placement at this time.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following•documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing 2 of 2; dated June 2002; received June 19, 2002; prepared by Chisholm,
Fleming and Associates.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the rehabilitation of an existing 3 metre x 1.5 metre (span x rise) 12.6
metre long single span open bottom concrete box culvert. The culvert is structurally adequate
to support the existing traffic, however, the culvert requires rehabilitation internally. Staff
commented on the project through the Schedule A - Environmental Assessment. The works
involve the rehabilitation of the culvert sidewalis by removing the 75 mm thick concrete facing
and pouring a new facing with a 225 mm thick steel reinforced concrete wall. The new wall will
extend the full length of both culvert sidewalis for a height of 1 metre. Works will be conducted
' in the dry though a a coffer dam method constructed from pea gravel bags . The duration of
the works will be approximately 2 weeks. The upstream drainage area of the watercourse is
greater than 125 hectares, therefore, the culvert is located within the Regional Storm
Floodplain.
Control of Flooding:
The hydraulic analysis for the proposed works have been reviewed and it has been determined
that there will be no impacts to regarding storage or conveyance associated with the new
facing. Excavated material will be relocated outside the floodplain.
442
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (coffer dam with pea gravel bags, dewatering sump, filter
bag, tarps over stream bed) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated
sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project. The works will be isolated from the
watercourse consecutively on either side of the culvert with a pea gravel coffer dam for a
duration of 2 weeks maximum. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential
for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated. The
proposed works will impact no significant resource features.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33338
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For Information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: July 11, 2002
443
Application #: 261/02/RH
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES. #B95 /02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.22 - 8.1.39, with the exception of 8.1.24 - Gore Road Investments, 8.1.29 -
Queenscorp (Dalesford) Inc. and 8.1.32 - Cougs Investments Ltd., the latter which was
withdrawn), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items, for which all the
required information was received and finalized as listed below.
RES. #B96 /02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS • PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
8.1.24 - Gore Road Investments
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
CARRIED
THAT a permit be granted In accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application
8.1.24 - Gore Road Investments, that had been scheduled on the agenda as an errata
item, for which all the required Information was received and finalized as listed below.
CARRIED
RES. #B97 /02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
8.1.29 - Queenscorp (Dalesford) Inc.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Maria Augimeri
THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application
8.1.29 - Queenscorp (Dalesford) Inc., that had been scheduled on the agenda as an
errata Item, for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed
below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.22 BRIDGEWOOD (SOMERS GLEN ESTATES)
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area in Block 304, Plan 43M -1512,
(21 Eastview Gate), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Bridgewood (Somers Glen Estates).
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area to accommodate the
construction of townhouse structures and an associated stormflow outfall.
444
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2007.
• Grading Plan, No. SP -1, dated April 2001, sealed July 9, 2002, by N. Valle of Urban
Ecosystems Limited.
• Silt Fence Detail, TRCA Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines.
• Letter of Undertaking (concerning design of overland flow swale), dated July 15, 2002,
by Nick Valle of Urban Ecosystems Limited.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area to accommodate the
construction of townhouse structures and an associated stormflow outfall within a block of a
recently registered plan of subdivision. The proposed grading will result in a stable engineered
slope commencing at the entrances of the walkout basements of the townhouse structures and
terminating at a point setback 2 metres from the rear property lines. The rear property lines
were established through the subdivision process and coincide with the top of bank which
contains the Regional Storm flows. The townhouses will be setback at least 10 metres from the
rear property lines and have been designed with disconnected drain spouts. The proposed
slopes are required to connect the residences to the required street elevation and location.
The stormflow outfall is required to direct flows to the watercourse during infrequent storm
events. All flows will be dissipated from a point over 30 metres from the watercourse and
directed overland across the vegetated slope.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no impacts to flooding as all works will be located outside of the Regulatory
Floodplain.
■
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion controls located between the proposed works and the valley corridor
will be installed prior to and maintained during construction to prevent any sediment or
construction generated debris from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed slopes and outfall structures will be engineered for long term stability and all
works will be surrounded with sediment and erosion controls. Therefore, there are no
geotechnical or fisheries concerns associated with this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is in conformity with Section 4.1 - New Development, and Section 4.3 -
Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program Policies.
445
CFN: 33369
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: July 12, 2002
Application #: 281 /02 /BRAM
8.1.23 EBRAHIM PROPERTIES INC.
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Part Block B, Plan 636, (376
Orenda Road), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on
the property owned by Ebrahim Properties Inc..
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate new grading
and paving works on the subject property.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Grading and Drainage Plan, No. G02, prepared by Par -Pak, dated June 18, 2001,
revised July 17, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is located on the north west comer of Orenda Road and Victoria Crescent
and contains an existing industrial office complex. The Etobicoke Creek is located to the west
of the site. The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate
replacement grading and paving works on the subject property. The replacement paving is to
occur to the north side of the existing industrial building. The works include the installation of a
new oil and grit separator in the receiving catchbasin to provide water quality treatment prior to
outleting flows into the adjacent Etobicoke Creek.
Control of Flooding:
There are no concerns for flooding associated with this application as all flows are contained
within the adjacent, channelized reach of the Etobicoke Creek.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion controls will be installed and maintained around the lirnit of construction
as well as the receiving catchbasins to prevent any sediment from entering the watercourse.
.Conservation of Land:
There are no significant natural features, geotechnical concerns, or fisheries issues associated
with this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is in conformity with Section 4.1 - New Development, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
446
CFN: 33293
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: June 14, 2002
Application #: 225/02/BRAM
8.1.24 GORE ROAD INVESTMENTS
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area
southeast of Ebenezer Road and McVean Drive, in the City of Brampton, Humber
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Gore Road Investments.
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area to accommodate the
construction of a new Fire Station and to perform minor grading works to install a stormwater
outfall within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the West Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Site Services and Grading Plan, Drawing No. G -1, prepared by Candevcon Ltd., dated
April 12, 2002, revised July 2, 2002.
• Site Plan and Details, Drawing No. A -1, prepared by Gerald P. Belanger Architect Inc.,
dated February 2002, revised July 11, 2002.
• Landscape Plan & Details, Drawing No. L -1, prepared by Reed Olsen Landscape
Architect Inc., dated March 2002, revised July 11, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking (to Illustrate tree protection fencing), prepared by Diarmuid
Horgan of Candevcon Limited, dated July 24, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area to accommodate the
construction of a new Fire Station and to perform minor grading works to install a stormwater
outfall within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the West Humber River. The Fire Station will be
setback at least 8 metres from the top of bank which is beyond the Regional Storm Elevation.
The proposed outfall will extend into the Regional Storm Floodplain and disperse overland
flows from a point at least 15 metres from the watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
Grade changes within the Regional Storm Floodplain for the outfall will be minimal. All building
downspouts will be disconnected and directed to vegetated areas where feasible. This
proposal will not affect the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion controls will be installed and maintained around the proposed works to
prevent sediment and construction generated debris from entering the watercourse. The storm
outfall is designed to provide water quality treatment through the use of stormceptors and
overland sheet flow.
447
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries concerns associated with this application. Native woody
and herbaceous vegetation is proposed around the storm outfall and throughout the tableland
buffer areas.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.1 - New Development, and Section 4.3 -
Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program policies.
CFN: 33249
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: May 27, 2002
CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
8.1.25
Application #: 209 /02 /BRAM
MITCHELL BROWN
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot D, Plan
919, (6915 Goreway Drive), in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as
located on the property owned by Mitchell Brown.
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction
of an industrial building and associated parking area within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Site Plan and Details, Drawing No. Al -01, prepared by Kirkor Architects & Planners,
dated July 9, 2002, revised June 18, 2002, redline revised (for sediment and erosion
controls) by B.C. on July 23, 2002.
• Silt Fencing Detail, TRCA Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines.
RATIONALE
The application was, reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm
Floodplain of the Mimico Creek to facilitate the-construction of an industrial building and
associated parking area. The subject property is a lot of record located on the fringe of the
flood plain. This proposal is currently being reviewed by the City of Mississauga and planning '
staff have confirmed that they have no significant concerns beyond the TRCA's interests. The
proposed works would be considered an infill situation as Goreway Drive is located to the west
lying further into the floodplain, closer to the creek. Surrounding properties to the north and
south and within areas regulated by the TRCA have been fully developed. The proposed
structure will be floodproofed to the Regional Storm Elevation.
448
Control of Flooding:
The proposed development is located on the floodfringe and will mitigate any Toss of flood
storage through a balance cut on the same property. There will be no impacts to off -site
properties.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be located around the subject property to prevent
overland migration of sediment and construction debris into the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The balance cut and fill will result in minimal grade changes in an area without any significant
geological or environmentally significant features. Sediment and erosion control fencing will be
located around the subject property. There are no associated goetechnical or fisheries related
concerns with this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
Staff support of the proposed works is based on compliance with the general purpose and
principles of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as outlined in
Sections 1.3 and 2.1. Although development criteria within VSCMP do not specifically
recognize the circumstances of the subject property, staff approval is based on the degree of
existing development within this reach, and the ability of the applicant to mitigate all flooding
impacts and concerns.
CFN: 33363
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: July 12, 2002
Application #: 279/02/MISS
8.1.26 CONRAD TURLINSKI
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 64, Plan
43M -460, (4053 River Mill Way), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by Conrad Turlinski.
The purpose is to excavate and construct an inground swimming pool, an inground hot tub,
and a cabana within the Regulatory Flood Plain and a landscaped armourstone wall within the
Fill Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek at the rear of an existing dwelling at 4053 River Mill
Way, Mississauga.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Site Plan for 4053 River Mill Way, Mississauga prepared by Solda Pools, Job #
02 -050, dated July 10, 2002. Redline revised, by TRCA July 19, 2002, to indicate silt
fencing to be established for the duration of construction and a note stating that all
excess fill will be removed from the site.
• Cross - section diagram for 4053 River Mill Way, Mississauga prepared by Solda Pools,
Job # 02 -050, dated July 10, 2002.
449
• Survey of Lot 64, Plan 43M -460, prepared by KRCMAR Surveyor Ltd., dated July 6,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is located within an approved residential subdivision.and contains an
existing dwelling within a Fill Regulated Area. The existing usable backyard is almost entirely
within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Etobicoke Creek. The proposal consists of minor
landscaping in the backyard to accommodate the installation of an inground swimming pool,
an inground hot tub and a cabana. Overall, there will be a net export of fill removed from the
floodplain. A landscaped armourstone wall is proposed within the Fill Regulated Area between
the existing dwelling and the proposed swimming pool.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not significantly affect the storage or conveyance of flood water. The proposed
inground'swimming pool and inground hot tub are located outside of the hydraulic floodway
and will involve the excavation of fill from the Regional Storm floodplain, thereby increasing
flood storage capacity. The pool cabana, which is an ancillary structure, is also located
outside of the hydraulic floodway. The proposed armourstone wall is located outside of the
Regional Storm floodplain.
Pollution:
As per redline revisions to the site plan, silt fencing will be installed and maintained during
construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. All excavated fill will be
removed from the site. There are no fisheries issues related to the project.
Conservation of Land:
A portion of the backyard, which is currently sodded and within the floodplain, will be lowered
to match existing grades at the rear of the property to facilitate the installation of the inground
swimming pool and inground hot tub. The 1 to 2 feet high armourstone wall will be used to
support landscaping works outside of the floodplain and adjacent to the house. The lands
immediately behind the property consist of an open space greenbelt associated with
Garnetwood Park which appears to be used for active recreational purposes (e.g. manicured
lawn, paved pathways, baseball diamond, etc.). No significant resource features will be
impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The oroposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) Development and Redevelopment / Intensification
With n Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33302
Report Prepared by: Marla Flores, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: June 18, 2002
450
Application #: 235/02/MISS
8.1.27 REGION OF PEEL
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Plan 43R- 12344, Part 7 Plan 43R- 12339, (South of Dundas
Street, west of Highway 427 at Summerville Court), in the City of Mississauga,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Region of Peel.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (to place 750mm diameter rock vane and 600 -750mm
diameter boulder revetment for erosion protection, to regrade the bank) in a Fill Regulated
Area; construct a structure (rock vane, boulder revetment) within a Regional Storm Floodplain;
alter a watercourse ( Etobicoke Creek) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March
31 or as extended by the MNR) through a coffer dam method in order to construct the work in
the dry.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Letter of Undertaking (to construct a permanent solution to protect Peel's trunk
sewer); dated May 15, 2002; received May 21, 2002; prepared by the Region of Peel.
• Cover Sheet; Plan C -2 -Sewer Manhole S12- 0236 - Rehabilitation Work -Plan And
Cross - Sections- red -lined July 24, 2002 by TRCA staff to add location of live staking;
Plan G -2 -Sewer Manhole S12- 0236 - Rehabilitation Work - General Notes; dated March
2002; received June 13, 2002; prepared by Winter Burnside.
• Revised Shoreline Seed Mix; dated July 23, 2002; received July 23, 2002; prepared by
Limestone Creek; submitted by Winter Burnside.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of the protection of Mississauga's exposed storm sewer outfall and
Peel's exposed sanitary sewer manhole on the west bank of the Etobicoke Creek. The works
involve the placement of a rock vane composed of 750 mm diameter boulders due east of the
exposed storm sewer and the placement of 600 -750 diameter rip -rap extending north of the
vane. All works will be conducted in the dry via a coffer dam method. Associated with the
rock vane/ boulder revetment will be the regrading of the bank for access with machinery. The
works will be located within Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain of the
Etobicoke Creek.
Control of Flooding:
The rock vane and boulder revetment have been reviewed by staff and it has been determined
that the fill encroachment is relatively minor and would have negligible impact on the storage
and conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (coffer dam with pea gravel bags) will be implemented to
ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The
construction of the works will be isolated from the watercourse .
451
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction in
accordance with a detailed planting plan acceptable to TRCA staff. There will be in- stream
works associated with this project. The rock vane/boulder revetment has been determined to
be an infill of fish habitat. The in- stream works will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or
destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from the Department of
Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The Region of Peel has provided a Letter of Intent which
indicates the compensation measures for the HADD of 10 square metres of fish habitat which
include: increased local aeration of flow as well as shelter and refuge associated with the rock
vane; and riparian plantings to provide shading. When the DFO authorization has been
received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways"
permit. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. A portion
of the works will be conducted on lands owned by the TRCA. An archaeological investigation
was not required since the site'was previously disturbed during the installation of the sewers.
The easement which is in place provides for the maintenance of the sewer. The Region does
not require permission from the TRCA to carry out the works within the easement.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3.- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32734
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: July 16, 2002
CITY OF PICKERING
Application #: 365/01/MISS
8.1.28 SILVER LANE ESTATES INC.
To alter a waterway on Part Lot 32, Concession 1, in the City of Pickering, Petticoat
Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Silver Lane Estates Inc..
The purpose is to construct two stormwater outfalls and a roadway connection partially within
the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain of the Petticoat Creek and an adjacent
tributary.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2007.
• Engineering and Siltation Control Drawings Nos. 1 -17, Project No. 0 -0178, Prepared
by David Schaeffer Engineering, revised as received on April 19th, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by Schaeffer and Associates, RE: The finalization of
engineering details to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, dated July 24th, 2002.
• Land scape Plans Drawing Nos. L1 -L4, Project No 01 -2172 prepared by Strybos
Associates Limited, revised as received on July 12th, 2002.
452
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to construct two storm outfalls, one on the Petticoat Creek and the
other to a tributary of the Petticoat Creek, to service a proposed residential subdivision on the
adjacent tableland. Two outfalls are required to maintain the existing predevelopment drainage
patterns. The site is located at the south side of the Altona Forest and the development limits
and servicing scheme now being approved, was established through the planning process for
the Altona community. The outfall structures are sufficiently setback from the watercourses and
have been designed to avoid impacts to any significant vegetation.
In addition, a roadway connection to Altona Road is being constructed to facilitate this
development. This roadway will cross a portion of the Petticoat Valley Corridor along the
alignment of a previously existing single residential lot access, to minimize disruption to the
valley. The roadway will not cross the watercourse which is south of the proposed alignment.
Control of Flooding:
The roadway is being designed to not impinge the floodplain of the Petticoat Creek.
Furthermore all grading associated with the outfalls will be confined to the work area. As a
result there will be no impacts to the control of flooding as a result of the works.
Pollution:
Sediment Fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the construction area and will remain in
place until the works are complete. There will be no instream works.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored in accordance with detailed planting plans provided by
Strybos and Associates and accepted by TRCA staff. This includes plantings at the outfall
locations and at the road crossing. Although not part of this permit an edge management plan
has been approved for works adjacent to Altona Forest.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. The works do not constitute a Harmful
Alteration Disruption or Distruction(HADD) and thus DFO approvals are not required.
CFN: 33116
Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: April 22, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
Application #: 152/02/PICK
8.1.29 QUEENSCORP (DALESFORD) INC.
To place fill within a regulated area on 245 Dalesford Road, in the City of Toronto
(Etobicoke Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the
453
property owned by Queenscorp (Dalesford) Inc..
The purpose is to place and remove fill through associated site grading within a FiII Regulated
Area to facilitate the construction of a new multi- storey, multi-unit condominium building.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2007.
• Site Plan and Statistics, No. A.101, drawn by B. Graziani, dated June 6, 2002, redline
revised (for sediment & erosion controls) by B.C. dated July 23, 2002.
• Cross - Sections A -E, Drawing Nos. 1 -5, prepared by Soil -Eng Limited, received June
18, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking (to satisfy any of TRCA's remaining geotechnical concerns), by
Mark Bozzo of Queenscorp Group, dated July 11, 2002.
• Silt Fence Detail, from TRCA Sediment and Erosion Control Guidelines.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill through associated site grading within a Fill Regulated
Area to facilitate the construction of a new multi - storey, multi-unit condominium building. The
proposed building has been reviewed and approved by the City of Toronto staff and TRCA staff
as a Site Plan Application subject to the issuance of a TRCA Fil Permit. The works will involve
the removal of almost 2 metres of previously placed fill that has created slope stability
concerns. The removal of fill will address slope stability concerns resulting in a minimum
building setback of 10- metres from the staked top of bank and 6- metres from the stable slope
line.
Control of Flooding:
The works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Mimico
Creek and there will be no impacts to the control of flooding.
Po lution:
Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent
sediment from entering the valley and the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All works and drawings will be certified by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer and will be
reviewed by TRCA staff in advance of any site alteration. Vegetation removal is minimal, not
significant and all disturbed areas will be restored with appropriate native woody and
herbaceous vegetation. There are no fisheries concerns related to this application.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.1 - New Development, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
454
CFN: 33295
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: June 17, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (HUMBER YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 233/02/TOR
8.1.30 CITY OF TORONTO PARKS AND RECREATION
To place fill within a regulated area on 1400 Weston Road - Charlton
Settlement/Portage Trail Park, in the City of Toronto (Humber York Community
Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Humber
River Watershed, in order to facilitate the construction of a new 3 meter (9.8 foot) by 125 meter
(410 foot) crushed stone pedestrian trail leading from a new tableland park, down into the
Humber River valley.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Existing Valley Vegetation Inventory D1 of 2, and Grading Plan, including
Hydroseeding Spec., Silt Control Details, and Valley Restoration Planting Plans D2 of
2, all prepared by Henry Kortekaas and Associates Inc., dated July 16, 2002, received
July 19, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated area of the Humber River
watershed, in order to facilitate the construction of a new 3 meter (9.8 foot) by 125 meter (410
foot) crushed stone walking/biking trail leading into the Humber River valley from the adjacent
tableland. Both the trail and an associated new park (Portage Trail Park), were requested by
the City of Toronto as a condition of approval for a nearby tableland housing development.
This trail will connect the housing development and tableland to the extensive Tommy
Thompson Trail system which runs along the Humber Valley. Minimal changes to grades and
vegetation will be required.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber
River. The control and storage of floodwaters will therefore not be affected.
455
Pollution:
The proposed works are located approximately 40 meters (130 feet) from the watercourse, and
will be conducted during the dry season (July /August). Sediment fencing will be used
throughout the construction process in order to prevent sediment from reaching the
watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
This land is owned by the TRCA and is under management agreement with the City of Toronto.
There are no significant resource features on site, and no slope stability /geotechnical issues
associated with this project. TRCA staff have determined that the proposed route is the least
disruptive to the slope, the vegetation of the slope, and to the animals which are utilizing the
area. Restoration in the form of hydroseeding and tree /shrub plantings will be undertaken
upon completion of the project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.2. - Resource Based Uses - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 33336 Application #: 260/02/TOR
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 28, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
8.1.31 PAUL PEROVICH
To place fill within a regulated area on 1/2 Northside Of Part 1 Lot 11, Concession 7,
(8580 Pine Valley Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Paul Perovich.
The purpose is to construct a single family dwelling within the Fill Regulated area of the
Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Site Servicing and Grading Plan for Perovich Residence prepared by Valdor
Engineering Limited dated June 2002 and last revised July 19, 2002
• Letter of undertaking prepared by Alfredo Mastrodicasa dated July 16, 2002
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
Construct a single family dwelling on a vacant lot in the Fill Regulated area of the Humber
River. The subject property backs onto the valley of the Humber River. The lot is currently
grassed and construction will not result in a loss of any natural features. Fill is required on the
lot to eliminate road drainage from Pine Valley Drive from flowing over the property.
456
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm flood plain, and therefore there
will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be erected prior to construction and will remain until the works are
complete and the area has been sodded to prevent sedimentation into the valley.
Conservation of Land:
The fill will not extend into the valley, and the land adjacent to the valley will be planted to
provide a buffer to the valley and to stabilize the rear portion of the yard.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with 4.1.1 - New Urban Development - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33332
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: June 26, 2002
TOWN OF AJAX
Application #: 256 /02/VAUG
8.1.32 COUGS INVESTMENTS LTD.
To alter a waterway on Part Lot 3, Concession 4, in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers
Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Cougs Investments Ltd.
• Withdrawn
8.1.33 RUNNYMEDE - WESTNEY LTD.
To alter a waterway on Lot 9,10, Concession 3, (Rossland Road at the south, to
Taunton Road at the North), in the Town of Ajax, Duffins Creek Watershed as
located on the property owned by Runnymede - Westney Ltd..
The purpose is to alter a watercourse to facilitate the construction of a clear span vehicular
bridge with a 17.0 metre width and a rise of 2.6 metres at the channel banks in conjunction with -
the construction of a municipal collector road, namely Williamson Drive, which will provide
access for the A6- Neighbourhood 2 Development.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Williamson Drive Bridge Crossing, Dwg. No. BRG, and Williamson Drive Bridge
Crossing Sediment Control Plan, Dwg. No. SED, prepared by Sabourin Kimble &
Associates Ltd., dated April 2002, date received July 22, 2002.
457
• Williamson Drive Bridge Crossing, General Arrangement Plan, Drawing No. S1,
prepared by Balke Engineering Inc., revision date July 10, 2002, date received July 15,
2002.
• Williamson Drive Bridge Crossing Grading & Restoration Planting Plan, Dwg: No. L -1,
Plant Material List & Planting Notes, Dwg. No. D -1, and A6 Channel Details, Dwg. No.
D -2, prepared by The MBTW Group, dated June 26, 2002, date received June 27,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal: _
In July 2000, the TRCA issued Permit No. C- 00126 to Runnymede Westney Ltd. to undertake a
realignment of the previously straightened channel in order to create a more natural
meandering channel and to remove some fish barriers (i.e. drop structures) from the
watercourse.. These works have not as yet been competed, however, as part of the
A6- Neighbourhood 2 Development in the Town of Ajax, Williamson Drive, a municipal collector
road is now required to allow permanent vehicular access across Miller Creek. The proposed
works will involve the construction of a 17 metre wide by 2.6 metre high clear span vehicular
bridge crossing the realigned channel, in addition to the construction of a temporary crossing
which is recuired to carry out the bridge construction as well as the internal earthworks
operations or the abutting subdivisions.
Control of Flooding:
The bridge has been designed to convey the Regional storm flood flows with a small
freeboard. The proposed works are therefore, not expected to impact on the storage or
conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sediment erosion-control measures will be implemented on the site and maintained during
both the realignment of the channel and the construction of the watercourse crossings in order
to ensure that construction- generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land: •
The bridge design meets the requirements for flood flow conveyance and pedestrian
underpass requirements. The pedestrian walkway will parallel the low flow channel under the
bridge. Considerations have been made to allow for wildlife corridor usage as well as natural
channel design geometries. Sediment and erosion control measure will be implemented.
Planting and site restoration works will take place upon completion of the bridge construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 3.3(C) - Policies and Procedures for Identifying
Watercourses and Alterations - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
458
CFN: 33174
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora'Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 3, 2002
TOWN OF CALEDON
Application #: 172/02 /AJAX
8.1.34 ALOHA INN LTD.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lots 10, 11, Block
4, Plan BOL -7, Part Lot 9, 12, Plan BOL -7, (20 Queen Street North), in the Town of
Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Aloha Inn
Ltd..
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm
Floodplain to accommodate the construction of a new commercial building within the Bolton
Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• New Construction Plan, Drawing No. NC, prepared by Tim Hortons, dated February
2002, revised July 17, 2002, redline revised (for location of silt fencing) by B.C. July
24, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking (to address stormwater quality), prepared by Bruce Hoppe of
the TDL Group Ltd., dated July 23, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm
Floodplain to accommodate the construction of a new Tim Horton's Restaurant within the
Bolton Special Policy Area (SPA). The proposed building will replace an existing vacant 989
square metre vacant building. While the applicant was able to demonstrate that flood - proofing
to the Regional Storm Elevation was not feasible, in keeping with SPA criteria, the entire site will
be elevated above the 350 -year Storm Elevation and the structure itself will be located 1.69
metres above the 350 -year elevation. The proposed building will be certified to withstand the
expected flood velocities of the Regional Storm. The approval of this Site Plan Application is
expected shortly from the Town of Caledon, however, the design is subject to change based
on a pending OMB decision concerning the applicant's desire to include drive -thru service in
the development.
Control of Flooding:
There are no off-site flood impacts anticipated as the proposed structure is 261 square metres
which is significantly less than the existing 989 square metre building that will be demolished.
The new structure will be flood- proofed above the 350 -year Storm Elevation.
459
Pollution:
The structure is setback from the Humber River by over 100 metres but will still be utilizing
standard sediment and erosion control fencing to ensure that construction- generated
sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no significant resource features on site that will be impacted by the proposed works.
All disturbed areas are planned to be paved during construction. There are no geotechnical or
fisheries concerns related to this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33364
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: July 12, 2002
Application #: 280 /02 /CAL
8.1.35 PETER SCHMITZ
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 37, Plan 43M -1374, (50 English Rose
Lane), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Peter Schmitz.
The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in order to
accommodate an above ground swimming pool and deck at 50 English Rose Lane, Bolton.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Site Plan for upper deck and pool on Lot 37, signed Peter Schmitz and dated July 15,
2002.
• Cross - section diagram for 50 English Rose Lane, signed Peter Schmitz and dated
July 15, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River in order to
accommodate a deck attached to the rear of an existing residential dwelling and an above
ground swimming pool in the rear yard. The subject property is part of an approved residential
subdivision in the northern part of Bolton. The rear lot line and fenceis consistent with the
approved top of bank staked by the TRCA as part of the subdivision approval process.
460
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm floodplain and, therefore, will
not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are over 100 metres from the watercourse and, therefore, no
sedimentation to the watercourse is expected from these works.
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope stability /geotechnical concerns associated with this proposal. The
proposed pool is located on a relatively flat surface and is set back approximately 2 metres
from the rear lot line and another 4.5 metres from the top of the slope behind the property. No
major regrading works are proposed. Furthermore, the existing lot is sodded and no
significant natural resource features will be impacted by these works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Development & Redevelopment /
Intensification Within Non - Established Communities / Highly Urbanized Areas - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33370
Report Prepared by: Maria Flores, extension 5244
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: July 12, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 283/02/CAL
8.1.36 ANGUS GLEN GOLF CLUB
To construct in a flood plain on (10060 Kennedy Road), in the Town of Markham,
Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Angus Glen Golf Club.
The purpose is to erect four temporary pedestrian bridge crossings within the Regional Storm
Floodplain of the Bruce Creek..
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Bridge Location Information Drawing entitled Corporate Hospitality Map, Bell
Canadian Open, prepared by the RCGA as received on July 24th, 2002.
• Bridge Detail, prepared by Angus Glen Golf Club, received on July 24th, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
461
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to construct four temporary pedestrian bridge crossings within the
Regional Storm Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area. The bridges are steel prefabricated
structures which will be placed over the watercourse and will be temporarily anchored. The
bridges will accommodate the PGA Tour Players and will be removed once the tour stop is
complete. There will be no interference with the low flow channel.
Control of Flooding:
The bridges are temporary and will be removed after the PGA Tour. As a result there will be no
impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
The brides will be constructed off site and placed over the watercourse. There will be no
impacts on the control of pollution.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored to original conditions through the use of riparian plant
material.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.2 - Existing Resource Based Uses of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33372
Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: July 15, 2002
Application #: 285 /02 /MARK
8.1.37 TOWN OF MARKHAM
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Lot 12, Concession 6 , (Victoria Avenue Bridge -North of Highway 7 and East of
Main Street), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Town of Markham.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for existing bridge footing removals and replacement .
, for erosion protection installation) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a structure (new
pedestrian bridge) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse ( Bruce Creek )
during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March -31, unless otherwise extended by MNR)
through coffer - damming in order to work in the dry.
The permit will be issued for the period of July-26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Cover Sheet; Drawing S1; Drawing S2; dated July 22, 2002; last revised July 22, 2002;
received July 24, 2002; prepared by Chisholm, Fleming and Associates.
• Ontario Provincial Standard Drawing - 219.110 - Light Duty Silt Fence Barrier; dated
January 2, 1996; received July 11, 2002; submitted by Chisholm, Fleming and
Associates.
462
• Ontario Provincial Standard Drawing - 219.190 - Silt Fence Flow Check; dated January
2, 1996; received July 11, 2002; submitted by Chisholm, Fleming and Associates.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering and restoration
plans) dated July 16, 2002; received July 17, 2002; submitted by Town of Markham.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the removal of the existing 13 metre long triple span bailey pedestrian
bridge with a 3.5 metre wide timber deck and 3 metre long approach ramps. The bridge has
deteriorated and requires removal. Staff commented on the proposal through the
Environmental Assessment process. The existing bridge provides pedestrian access to the
pathway /trail system in the park located east and north of the crossing. The proposed
pedestrian bridge will be a 24 metre single span pre- fabricated steel truss bridge with an
overall structural width of 3 metres. The new bridge abutments will be setback from the
channel banks given the larger span and the existing abutments will be removed. The general
alignment of the bridge will remain the same. Rip rap erosion protection will be constructed
along the banks. The site is located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm
Floodplain associated with the Bruce Creek.
Control of Flooding:
TRCA staff has reviewed the hydraulic modelling for the proposed bridge and it was
determined to be satisfactory. Grades will be modified slightly however, the impacts to the
floodplain will be negligible.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (coffer dam with pea gravel bags, silt fence, tarp )will be
implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the
watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in- stream works associated with this project. With erosion and sedimentation
plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish
habitat will be mitigated. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource
features.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33238
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: July 15, 2002
463
Application #: 201 /02 /MARK
8.1.38 TOWN OF MARKHAM
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Lot 30, Concession 1 Part Lot 5, 7, 9, Plan 30, (Pomona Mills Park), in the Town of
Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of
Markham.
The purpose is to place fill in a regulated area, construct in a flood plain, and alter a
watercourse in order to facilitate the construction of a trail, boardwalk and pedestrian bridge
crossing, in Pomona Mills Park in the Town of Markham.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Drawing 1-1, Existing Conditions & Tree Inventory, prepared by the Town of Markham,
dated June 16, 2002, received July 18, 2002.
• Drawing L -2, Trail Layout, prepared by the Town of Markham, dated June 16, 2002,
received July 18, 2002.
• Drawing 1-3, Bridge Elevation & Plan, prepared by the Town of Markham, dated June
16, 2002, received July 18, 2002.
• Drawing L-4, Restoration Plan, prepared by the Town of Markham, dated June 16,
2002, received July 18, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The Town of Markham has proposed to construct a trail connection in an existing municipal
park, known as Pomona Mills Park, consisting of a wooden boardwalk, a pathway and a steel,
prefabricated pedestrian bridge; the pathway will be asphalt or gravel, depending on funding.
The section of the park where the work is proposed is north of John Street and east of Yonge
Street in Markham. The proposed trail will connect to an existing trail in the park. Together,
the new trail, boardwalk and the bridge, will be about 112 meters in length. The 25 metre,
prefabricated bridge will span the watercourse, with its footings sufficiently setback from top of
bank. TRCA's Environmental Services staff have been hired by the Town of Markham to carry
out this work.
Control of Flooding:
The amount of grading required for the proposed works located in the Regional Storm Flood
Plain, is negligible and all excess fill will be removed from the site. Therefore, there will be no
impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
464
Pollution:
No work is proposed within the watercourse, and therefore the proposal does not require an
authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. A letter of advice will be provided
to the applicant detailing required mitigative measures. The proposed bridge work will take
place within the cold water timing window of June 15 to September 15. Sediment generated
by the proposed works will be prevented from entering the watercourse with silt fencing, to be
in place for the duration of construction. Soils will be stabilized with the planting of native,
woody species.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical issues associated with the proposal and no significant natural
heritage features will be affected. Silt fencing will prevent sedimentation of the watercourse for
the duration of construction, and the site will be stabilized and enhanced, with the planting of
native, woody species.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 H) - Existing Resource -based Uses, of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33358
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: July 10, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 275 /02 /MARK
8.1.39 BELL CANADA
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 25, Concession 2, 3 (Eglin Mills Road
East), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Bell Canada.
The purpose is to excavate in a fill regulated area in order to install Bell Canada conduit under
a watercourse by directional bore method.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004.
• Plan -404, Drawing No. 201143 -4, prepared by Alnley Group, dated September 2001,
received July 24, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate in a fill regulated area in order to place Bell Canada conduit under
Beaver Creek, on the south side of Eglin Mills Road East, between Bayview Avenue and Leslie
Street. The conduit will be placed underneath the existing Bell Canada conduit, a minimum of
1.5 metres beneath the watercourse, by directional bore method.
465
Control of Flooding:
Existing grades will be maintained and all excess fill will be removed from site. Therefore, there
will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The bore pits will be located a minimum of 15 metres from the watercourse on either side. Silt
fencing will be installed for the duration of the proposed works in order to prevent sediment
from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no instream works associated with the proposal; the conduit will be installed by
directional bore, a minimum of 1.5 metres below the watercourse. There are no geotechnical
issues associated with the project, and no significant natural features will be affected.
Following completion of the works, all disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored to their
original condition.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is. consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33319
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: June 24, 2002
CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
Application #: 245/02/RH
8.1.40 ENBRIDGE CONSUMERS GAS
• To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on (Eglinton Avenue East
between Tomken Road and Maingate Drive), in the City of Mississauga,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of
Mississauga.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate a gas pipeline
crossing the Little Etobicoke Creek on a proposed easement (north side of Eglinton Avenue
East between Tomken and Maingate) by directional bore method.
The permit will be issued for the period of to in accordance with the following documents and
plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing No. L- 26706, initialed K.C., dated June 6, 2002, received by TRCA June 20, '
2002. Redline revised to indicate that all fill and storage of equipment will be placed
outside of the Regional Storm floodplain and top of bank, July 15, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
466
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate a gas
pipeline crossing the Little Etobicoke Creek on a proposed easement (north side of Eglinton
Avenue East between Tomken Road and Maingate Drive) by directional bore method.
Control of Flooding:
No excavated material will be stockpiled within the Regional Storm floodplain and all existing
grades will be maintained. The proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of
flood waters.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will encircle the bore pits to impede the overland migration of construction
generated sediments.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no in- stream works and no impact to riparian vegetation. The gas main will be
installed through directional boring a minimum of 1.5 metres beneath the watercourse.
Sediment fencing will be erected at the bore pit locations and all disturbed areas will be
revegetated following construction. There are no fisheries concerns or geotechnical issues
related to this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33322
Report Prepared by: Marla Flores, extension 5244
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: June 24, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO [MIDTOWN COMMUNITY]
Application #: 247 /02 /MISS
8.1.41 PETER WEISS AND KAREN TRIMMER
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12, Lot
11, Plan 3464, (17 Knightswood Road), in the City of Toronto (Midtown
Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Peter Weiss and Karen Trimmer.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and partially within the
Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River, within the Hogg's Hollow Special Policy Area, in
order to facilitate the construction of a 40 square metre addition onto the rear (south side) of an
existing single family dwelling and the enclosure of the existing carport structure on the east
side of the house for use as a garage.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
467
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by the applicant, stating that the proposed addition
will be floodproofed to the Regional Storm Flood level, dated July 24, 2002, date
received July 24, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and partially within the
Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River, within the Hogg's Hollow Special Policy Area, in
order to facilitate the construction of a 40 square metre addition onto the rear (south side) of
the existing single family dwelling and the enclosure of the existing carport structure on the
east side of the house for use as a garage.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River
(Hogg's Hollow Special Policy Area). The new structure will be located outside of the hydraulic
floodway and above the 350 Year Flood elevation of the Don River, and will be structurally
fioodproofed to the level of the Regional Storm flood level. The proposed rear addition will
extend approximately 2 metres from the rear wall of the house, and will not impact on the
storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pol ution:
All excess fill will be removed from the site. Sedimentation of the watercourse as a result of
construction is not expected since the existing home is located more than 90 metres from the
Don River.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are consistent with existing development within the corridor reach,
involving only a minor addition onto the rear of the existing dwelling within the Hogg's Hollow
Special Policy Area. There are no significant resource features on site and there are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1. (B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Re- Development within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33379
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 24, 2002
468
Application #: 297/02/TOR,
CITY OF TORONTO [NORTH YORK COMMUNITY]
8.1.42 CITY OF TORONTO
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on ( Newtonbrook Park at
Manorcrest Drive - Site 16), in the City of Toronto (North York Community
Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by the
City of Toronto.
The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and alter a watercourse to facilitate the
'repair of existing stream bank erosion protection works along Newtonbrook Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Site Plan prepared by the City of Toronto, revision date May 30,
2002, date received May 31, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and alter a watercourse to facilitate the
repair of stream bank erosion protection works along Newtonbrook Creek. The proposed
works involve the removal of a 70 metre section of gabion lined channel, on both sides of the
watercourse, which is failing and falling into the watercourse. The new stream bank protection
works include the placement of river stone at the base of the embankment to a height of 3
metres and the upper slope being graded back to a 1:1 slope and planted with willows and
dogwood. Additional erosion protection will be placed around the existing manhole.
Control of Flooding:
The project will maintain the existing stream profile and therefore will not impact on the storage
or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The works will be constructed in the dry using a coffer dam method to divert flow around the
work areas. Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during
construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The original watercourse was realigned and straightened several years ago, resulting in a
manmade gabion Tined channel. The proposed works are required to address a potential
erosion hazard on adjacent private property as well as offer protection to the existing manhole.
Potential impacts to fish habitat can be mitigated through the use of sediment and erosion
measures, site restoration, and completing instream works during warm water timing
guidelines (July 1 to March 31). All works will be undertaken within the City of Toronto
easement and completed from the top of bank.
469
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with .Section 5.2 - Erosion Control and Slope Stability Remedial
Works - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32980
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 25, 2002
Application #: 087/02/TOR
8.1.43 CITY OF TORONTO
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on (Burbank Drive and
Citation Drive - Site 18), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council
Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by the City of
Toronto.
The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area and alter a watercourse to facilitate the
construction of new stream bank eros on protection works, the repair of existing erosion works
and the installation of an additional culvert within a tributary of the East Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Site Plan prepared by City of Toronto, revision date May 30, 2002,
date received May 31, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the placement of fill in a Fill Regulated Area and the alteration to a
watercourse to facilitate the construction of new stream bank erosion protection works and the
repair of existing erosion works along a tributary of the East Don River. The proposed works
include the placement of river stone and rock rip rap in erosion scars, the placement of stone
material around an existing sanitary sewer outfall which has become exposed, the removal of
failed gabion weirs from the watercourse, and the installation of a second 900 mm by 4m CMP
culvert adjacent to an existing undersized culvert under a walking trail.
Control of Flooding:
The project will maintain the existing stream profile and therefore will not impact on the storage
or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The works will be constructed in the dry using a coffer dam method to divert'flow around the
work areas. Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during
construction to prevent sediments from entering the watercourse.
470
Conservation of Land:
Potential impacts to fish habitat will be compensated through the removal of the current fish
barriers, being the gabion weirs, by completing the works in the dry and following the warm
water timing guidelines of July 1 to March 31, as well as the restoration of all disturbed areas
and use of sediment control measures.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32977
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 25, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO [SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY]
Application #: 089/02/TOR
8.1.44 CHRISTINE LINK AND DANIEL CULLY
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 30, Concession A Lot 41, Plan 975,
(35 Springbank Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community
Council Area), Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by
Christine Link and Daniel Cully.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Lake
Ontario waterfront to facilitate the demolition of the existing house and the construction of a
new single family residence.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Lot 41, Existing & Proposed Site Plan, Dwg. No. A -01, prepared by B
Gray Design Build, revision date July 18, 2002, date received July 22, 2002.
Floor Plans, Dwg. No. A -02, Roof & Floor Plans, Dwg. No. A -03, Elevations, Dwg. No.
A -04, Elevations, Dwg. No. A -05, prepared by B Gray Design Build, dated May 7, 2002,
date received May 7, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the demolition of the existing home and the construction of a slightly
larger residence, basically within the same building footprint, with the proposed rear sun porch
maintaining the same setback from top of bank as the existing rear deck. The new house will
be located entirely within the Fill Regulated Area but totally outside the flood and erosion
hazard associated with Lake Ontario, and will maintain an appropriate access area to the rear
of the residence.
471
Control of Flooding:
All works are located outside the Regulatory flood level and wave uprush zone of Lake Ontario,
and therefore will not impact on the conveyance of flood waters.
• Pollution:
Sediment control measures will be implemented on the site to prevent sedimentation of the
lake.
Conservation of Land:
In order to combat the severe erosion experienced along this reach of the Scarborough Bluffs,
slope stabilization works and the construction of groynes were undertaken by the TRCA to
protect the existing residences, including the subject property. The proposed new residence
will be situated basically within the existing building footprint and the applicant has provided a
geotechnical analysis, prepared to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, indicating that the new house
will besufficiently setback from the slope. The proposed works are consistent with other
waterfront development in the area and are not expected to impact any significant features.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section-4.2.2 - Replacement Structures - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33194
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 10, 2002
Application #: 183/02/TOR
8.1.45 CITY OF TORONTO
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on (Dorcot Avenue, Brimley
Road, Birkdale Road, Landfair Crescent
- Sites 4, 5, 6 and 8), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council
Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of
Toronto.
The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and alter a watercourse to facilitate the
construction of new stream bank erosion protection works and the repair of existing erosion
works within the Highland Creek watershed.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Site Plans prepared by City of Toronto for Site Nos. 4, 5, & 6,
revision date May 30, 2002, date received May 31, 2002, and Site No. 8, date received
February 11, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
472
Proposal:
The proposal involves the placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area and the alteration to
watercourses to facilitate the construction of new stream bank erosion protection works and
the repair of existing erosion works that have failed. The works include the removal of old
gabion baskets and the reshaping of the embankments to 1:1 slopes with the placement of 400
to 600 mm. river stone at the base of slope and plantings above. The new construction sites
involve the filling in of erosion scars and the protection of the filled areas with river stone and
rock rip rap.
Control of Flooding:
The projects will maintain the existing stream profiles and therefore not impact on the
storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
All works will be conducted in the dry using a coffer dam method to divert flow around the work
areas. Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during
construction to prevent sediments from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
Potential impacts to fish habitat can be mitigated through the use of erosion control measures,
site restoration and completing instream works during warm water timing guidelines (July 1 to
March 31). All works will be undertaken within City of Toronto easements and completed from
top of bank.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 5.2 - Erosion Control and Slope Stability Remedial
Works - of the Authority's Valley and StreaM Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33377
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 19, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 291/02/TOR
8.1.46 TONY DISOTTO
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 16, Concession 8, (5844
Rutherford Road), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located
on the property owned by Tony Disotto.
The purpose is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of the
Humber River to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling, driveway and septic
system.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
473
• Site Plan illustrating proposed new house, garage and driveway, with red -lined
sediment control fence detail, prepared by Tony DISotto, dated received by TRCA,
July 17, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to demolish an existing dwelling, and to construct a new single family'dwelling,
driveway, garage and septic system on an existing lot of record within the Humber River valley
outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. The property is characterized as a plateau within the
valley which exhibits a secondary top -of -bank. ,The property is bordered by existing residential
properties to the north and south and the development is consistent with adjacent properties.
The new dwelling is setback approximately 100m from the channel bank of the Humber River
and approximately 20m from the secondary top -of -bank, and is consistent with the setback of
the existing dwelling to be demolished. All new structures are to be sited on existing disturbed
and manicured areas.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore, there
will be no impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
No works within sensitive areas of the valley corridor are proposed and sediment control
fencing is to be installed to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
No significant vegetation will be removed as all new structures will be built on currently
manicured areas. All disturbed areas are to be immediately stabilized upon completion of
construction. There have been no geotechnical or erosion hazard issues identified.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33371
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: July 18, 2002
474
Application #: 290 /02/VAUG
TOWN OF CALEDON
8.1.47 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF CALEDON
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area
on Lot 6, 7, Concession 8 , (Albion- Vaughan Road construction and widening
from Queensgate Blvd. northward to King Street), in the Town of Caledon,
Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by The Corporation
of the Town of Caledon.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for road construction and widening, storm sewer
installation, bridge abutment removal and installation, re- alignment of Cold Creek meander,
construction of swales, construction of temporary access) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct a
structure (Humber bridge replacement, construction of 2 headwalls) within a Regional Storm
Floodplain; alter a watercourse ( Humber River and Cold Creek) during the coldwater timing
window (June 15 to September 15 or as extended by MNR) by coffer dam method in order to
conduct bridge works and re- alignment in the dry and by installing temporary culverts on Cold
Creek for access..
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing 4 of 27- Removals, Adjustments and Siltation Control- Sta. 1+705 to Sta. 2
+380; Drawing 8 of 27- Grading, Pavement and Drainage -Sta 1+750 to Sta 2 +040;
Drawing 9 of 27- Grading, Pavement and Drainage -Sta 2 +040 to Sta 2 +370; Drawing
19 of 27 -Work Area Staging and Erosion Control -Stage 1; Drawing 20 of 27 -Work Area
Staging, Erosion Control and Cold Creek Diversion -Stage 1; Drawing 21 of 27 -Cold
Creek Diversion Staging -Stage 2; Drawing 22 of 27- Work Area Staging -Stage 2;
Drawing 27 of 27- Wetland Creation Details; Contract 02- 07- Albion- Vaughan Road; all
dated May 2002; all received June 25, 2002; prepared by McCormick Rankin
Corporation.
• Drawing 2 of 25- Albion- Vaughan Road Legend; Drawing 3 of 25- Removals and
Adjustments Sta. 1.075 to Sta 1+705; Drawing 11 of 25 -OId King Road - Grading,
Pavement and Drainage, Sta 7 +158 to Sta 7 +265; Drawing 13- Typical Sections;
S1- General Arrangement; S3- Constructing Staging; all dated May 2002; all received
May 10, 2002; prepared by McCormick Rankin.
• Drawing 23- Erosion Control Details; Drawing 24 - Creek Diversion Plan and Details;
Drawing 25 -Creek Diversion Details; all dated April 2002; all received May 10, 2002;
prepared by McCormick Rankin.
• Drawing L01 of 3- Landscaping Sta. 1+075 to Sta 1+705; Drawing L03 of
3- Landscaping Planting Details and List; all dated April 2002; all received May 10,
2002; prepared by Ecoplans Limited.
• -Drawing L02 of 3- Landscaping Sta. 1+705 to Sta 2 +380; dated May 2002; received
Julie 25, 2002; prepared by Ecoplans.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering and restoration
plans); dated July 11, 2002; received July 12, 2002; prepared by the Town of Caledon.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
475
Proposal:
The proposal involves the construction of the Albion- Vaughan Road from Queensgate
Boulevard northward to just south of the King Street in Bolton. The works will involve the
grading for road construction and widening, installation of storm sewers, two headwalls and
swales, the removal and replacement of the existing bridge deck and abutments over the
Humber River on the Albion -King Townline Road, the construction of a temporary access with
culverts across the Cold Creek, the re- alignment of the meander of Cold Creek to the east to
accommodate the road widening, the construction of swales, the modification of an existing
depressional area as a wetland outfall to the Humber and the protection of the archaeological
site on TRCA lands with a retaining wall. The proposal has been reviewed by TRCA staff
during the Environmental Assessment Process. This is Phase 1 of the proposal and Phase 2
will be the works northwards along the Albion -King Townline Road. The majority of the
Contract, except for the southern extent, is located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional
Storm Floodplain of the Humber River.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed 20 metre length triple span bridge over the watercourse will be longer that than
the current 10 metre structure and will be constructed beyond the existing channel and
abutments. The existing structure has one 16 metre x 3.2 metre opening and the proposed
triple structure will have two 13 metre spans on the north and south and one 20 metre span in
the middle with the watercourse for a total of 45 metres. The hydraulic analysis was reviewed
and found acceptable by TRCA staff . The proposed modifications to the Humber River
structure and road profile will not result in significant increases in upstream flood elevations
during a Regional Storm event.
Pollution:
Enhanced flat -bottom grassed swales will be constructed to the south of the Humber River and
east of the Albion- Vaughan Road widening as well as on the east side of the road north of
Cold Creek. Runoff will be directed to the swales via storm sewers along the roads. The swale
was chosen as the preferred measure for water quality control and the prevention of erosion
due to road runoff. Standard erosion control measures (coffer dams - concrete barriers with
geotextile, pea gravel bags; rock check dams, silt fences) will be implemented to ensure that
the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project. The bridge works will require a
coffer dam (concrete barrier with geotextile) to isolate the abutment and deck removal and
bridge construction from the watercourse in order to work in the dry. The temporary access
road across the Cold Creek will require culverts for a duration of 2 weeks and this access road
will be restored upon completion of the realignment works. With erosion and sedimentation
plans in effect for the bridge works, and the temporary crossing, the potential for a harmful
alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated. However, the in
stream works associated with the meander re- alignment will constitute a harmful alteration,
disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed widening of the Alibion- Vaughan
Road will require an intrusion into the edge of Cold Creek along the outside of the meander for
476
a distance of approximately 30 metres and a maximum width of 4.5 metres . A reduction in
channel length of approximately 7 metres will result. The proponent supplied a Letter of
Intent which indicated that the HADD can be compensated by constructing the realigned
meander using naturalized design principles; by enhancing the existing pool located at the
upstream end of the reach; by replacing the native substrates; by providing woody instream
cover with the installation of root wads; by creating a point bar for dispersion of flows and
reduction of velocities and by providing riparian plantings.. When the DFO authorization has
been received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to
Waterways" permit. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features.
The works will be conducted on lands owned by the TRCA. TRCA's Archaeologist reviewed
the proposal and indicated that the remnant foundation of the log cabin located on the east
side of the existing Albion- Vaughan Townline, just south of the Humber River, will be protected
by a satisfactory means with the construction of a retaining wall. TRCA's Property Section will
be bringing forward a report to the Executive Committee regarding the temporary and
permanent easements for the swales and work easements.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33228
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: July 17, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 190/02 /CAL
8.1.48 1440106 ONTARIO INC.
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 16,17,18,
Concession 9, (Tributary 1 -North of 16th Avenue between 9th Line and Reesor
Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the
property owned by 1440106 Ontario Inc..
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for channel re- creation) in a Fill Regulated Area; alter
a watercourse ( Tributary 1 of Little Rouge River) during the coldwater timing window (July 1 to
September 15 or as extended by MNR) by a dam and pump around method in order to work in
the dry to complete the channel lowering and renaturalization.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Sheet 72- Channel Rehabilitation Plan; Sheet 73- Channel Profile; Sheet 74- Landscape
Details; Sheet 75- Landscape Details; Sheet 76- Landscape Details; Sheet
77- Landscape Details; all dated June 28, 2002; all received July 2, 2002; prepared by
Marshall Macklin Monaghan.
477
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering drawings and restoration
plans); dated July 24, 2002; received July 24, 2002; prepared by the Marshall Macklin
Monaghan.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the 3 metre lowering and naturalization of an existing channel, Tributary
1, which is approximately 300 metres in length and which flows northward from the proposed
Markham By -pass to the Little Rouge River. The lowering and naturalization are part of the
compensation package required by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans for the harmful,
alteration, destruction, disruption (HADD) of fish habitat from the construction of the
stormwater management pond south of the Markham By -pass . The subject property is
located within a fill regulated area . There is a Regional Storm floodplain associated with the
Rouge River at the confluence of the tributary.
Control of Flooding:
The hydraulic report submitted for the proposal has been reviewed by TRCA staff. There are
some modifications required to the report and drawings and the proponent has submitted a
Letter of Undertaking to provide these revisions.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (erosion matting, coffer dam and pump around) will be
implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the
watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project. Tributary 1 will be lowered and
naturalized and the works will involve damming and pumping around in order to work in the
dry. The in stream works will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD)
of fish habitat and will require an authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
(DFO). The naturalization will involve live fascine plantings, a pool /riffle sequence, rock weirs
and brush mattresses. The Ministry of Natural Resources will be handling the DFO
authorization for the lowering and naturalization since MNR had the agreement with the DFO at
the time of issuing the details for the compensation. When the DFO authorization has been
received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways"
permit.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33374
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: July 24, 2002
478
Application #: 288 /02 /MARK
8.1.49 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 20, 21, Concession 7,
(Exhibition Creek culvert on Major Mackenzie Drive just west of Highway 48), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Regional Municipality of York.
The purpose is to construct a structure (1.5m diameter x 40.6 m CSP culvert) within a Regional
Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (Exhibition Creek) during the coldwater timing window
(July 1 to September 15) through culvert installation by working in the dry. The subject
property is not regulated for fill placement at this time.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Sheet 79 -New Construction 12 +025 to 12 +375; Sheet 85- Culvert Details; dated May
23, 2002; received July 11, 2002; prepared by LEA Consulting Ltd.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to the engineering plans and documents
and restoration plans); dated July 24, 2002; received July 24, 2002; prepared by the
Region of York.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the widening of Major Mackenzie Drive from two to five lanes which
includes the removal of the 1.83m x 1.11m x 25 m Exhibition Creek culvert and replacement
with a 1.5m diameter x 40.6 metre CSP culvert. The Major Mackenzie Road widening from
Woodbine Avenue to Markham Road was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental
Assessment process. The project will be proceeding in phases with the Exhibition Creek
culvert section in 2002 in conjunction with the Markham Bypass. The remaining road work is
scheduled for 2004. The Exhibition Creek culvert is not located within a Fill Regulated Area,
however, the watercourse does have a Regional Storm Floodplain.
Control of Flooding:
The hydraulics for the proposed culvert have been reviewed by TRCA staff and require some
modifications. The Region of York has supplied a Letter of Undertaking agreeing to provide the
necessary revisions.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, silt fence) will be implemented to
ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.
479
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project. The new culvert will be installed in
the dry then the existing culvert will be removed and the ephemeral watercourse will be
relocated to the new culvert slightly to the west. The in stream works will constitute a harmful
alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from
the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). When the DFO authorization has been
received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways"
permit.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33071
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: July 23, 2002
Application #: 135 /02 /MARK
8.1.50 REGION OF YORK
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 17, 18, 19,
Concession 9 , Lot 21, Concession 8, (Markham By- pass -North of 16th Avenue
to Major Mackenzie Drive between Highway 48 and 10th Line), in the Town of
Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Region
of York.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for road construction, installation of culverts) in a Fill
Regulated Area; alter a watercourse (Tributary #1 and #2 of Rouge River) during the coldwater
timing window (July 1 to September 15 or as otherwise extended by MNR) by installing culverts
in the dry and by constructing storm outfalls to Tributary 1 and 2.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Sheet 14 -New Construction - Sta 14 +150 to 14 +475 -dated June 25, 2002; Sheet
15 -New Construction -Sta. 14 +475 to Sta. 14 +800 -dated July 4, 2002; Sheet 30- Typical
Sections -Sta 13 +900 to 9th Line; dated July 4, 2002; Sheet 36- Miscellaneous Details,
dated June 14, 2002; received July 11, 2002; prepared by TSH engineers, architects,
planners.
• Sheet 1- Removals and New Construction -New Markham By -pass; dated June 26,
2002; Sheet 19 -New Construction -Sta. 10 +100 to Sta. 10 +450 -dated June 10, 2002;
Sheet 27 -New Construction -Sta. 9 +950 to Sta. 10 +300, dated June 11, 2002; Sheet
31- Typical Sections -9th Line to Major Mackenzie, dated June 14, 2002; Sheet 34-
Typical Sections, dated May 31, 2002; Sheet 35- Typical Sections, dated June 13,
2002; received June 27, 2002; prepared by TSH engineers, architects, planners.
480
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to restoration plans and engineering plans
and documents); dated July 24, 2002; received July 24, 2002; prepared by the Region
of York.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of the construction of a section of the Markham By -pass between the
10th Line in the east to Highway 48 in the west and from 16th Avenue northward to Major
Mackenzie Drive. The Markham By -pass will eventually extend from Highway 407 in the south
to north of Major Mackenzie Drive where it will connect to Highway 48. The road will be
constructed for 2 lanes with grading for 4 lanes with a combination of rural (ditches) and urban
(curb and gutter) cross - sections. Storm and sanitary sewers will be installed as well as outfalls
to Tributary 1 and 2. TRCA staff commented on the alignment through the Environmental
Assessment process. There are 4 small sections of this phase of the project which require a
permit. Tributary 1 and 2 at the eastern section of the project will require the installation of
culverts and outfalls. A 2.4m x 1.8m x 70.76 concrete box culvert and a 1600 diameter x 55m
corrugated steel pipe (CSP) will be installed at Tributary 1. A 2.4m x 1.8 m x 43.92 m concrete
box culvert will be installed at Tributary 2. Two culverts are required at Tributary 1 in order to
phase the naturalization of the watercourse north of Markham By -pass. The watercourse
naturalization will be completed by Metrus and is part of the compensation package for the
previous alteration of the watercourses south of the proposed Markham By -pass. The
proposed CSP for Tributary 1 will be installed due east of the existing watercourse and will
maintain existing flows. The proposed concrete box culvert will be installed and temporarily
sealed with bulkheads until the stream naturalization has been completed downstream. A
small section of road construction at the northern limits of work along the 9th line is located
within a Fill Regulated Area and will require regrading and the installation of storm sewers. A
small section at the eastern limit of works along Major Mackenzie Drive is also located within
the Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River and will require
regrading.
Control of Flooding:
The hydraulic information regarding the culvert sizing calculations received July 11, 2002 has
been reviewed by TRCA staff and requires modifications. The Region of York has provided a
Letter of Undertaking to provide the modifications. There is a small section of the south ditch
along Major Mackenzie Drive which requires only minor work and the grading is not expected
to impact flood levels.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, check dams, erosion blankets) will be
implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the
watercourse. Grassed swales have been incorporated into the design to address water quality
in the rural sections and storm sewers will be installed in the urban sections. Drainage from
the storm sewers will be directed to a stormwater management pond.
481
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in- stream works associated with this project. Two culverts will be installed at
Tributary 1 and one culvert at Tributary 2. The in- stream works will constitute a harmful
alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from
the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The Ministry of Natural Resources will be
handling the DFO authorization for Tributary 1 since MNR had the agreement with the DFO at
the time of issuing the details for the compensation. When the DFO authorization has been
received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways"
permit.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32771.B
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: July 23, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 005 /02 /MARK
8.1.51 122270 ONTARIO INC.
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part
5 Lot , Concession 1 Part Lot 51, Plan 65R- 20420, (1 0758 - 10909 Yonge
Street - north -west corner of Yonge Street and Elgin Mills Road), in the Town of
Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by
122270 Ontario Inc..
The purpose is to construct structures (two box culverts, retaining walls, headwall, inlet
structure) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (German Mills Creek) during
the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31 or as otherwise specified by MNR) through a
stream naturalization and re- alignment. The subject property is not regulated for fill placement
at this time.
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Sheet LP.1 of 3- Landscape Plan and Details -dated March 2001, last revised October 2,
2001; Sheet LP.2 of 3- Landscape Plan - Channel, dated March 2001 -last revised
October 2, 2001; Sheet LP.3 of 3- Landscape Plan: Channel Rehabilitation- dated
March 2001, last revised February 28, 2002; all received March 25, 2002; all prepared
by Salmona Tregunno.
• Drawing S1 -Inlet Structure and Retaining Wall -dated March 1997, last revised March
19, 1998; all received March 25, 2002; all prepared by Moon -Matz Ltd.
482
• Drawing SS -1 -Site Servicing and Grading- dated October 1996, last revised August
28, 2001; Drawing SS- 2A- Channel Plan and Profile- dated January 1997, last revised
August 25, 2001; Drawing SS- 2B- Channel Plan and Profile- dated January 1997, last
revised August 28, 2001; Drawing SS- 3- Channel Details- dated January 1997, last
revised August 25, 2001; Drawing SS- 4- Channel Details- dated January 1997, last
revised March 14, 2001; Drawing SS -5 -Creek Diversion Construction Staging- dated
November 2000, last revised September 6, 2001; all received March 25, 2002; all
prepared by W.G. Notenboom.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the development of the property at the north -west corner of Yonge Street
and Elgin Mills Road. The conceptual approvals for the channel modifications were given
through the land use planning process in the early 1980's. TRCA staff has worked with the
proponent to provide a net benefit to the project and to ensure that adequate compensation is
provided through the permit process as well as the municipal site plan process. The works
involve the re- alignment of a section of the German Mills Creek on the west side of the
property. The re- aligned channel will be naturalized and enhanced. The CSP culvert under
Leonard Street at the northern extremity of the property will be removed and replaced with a
box culvert with a low flow channel. There will be a culvert installation north of Elgin Mills Road
as well will include baffles for fish migration. The proposed building on the east side of the
property will not be located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The subject property is not
located within a Fill Regulated Area. The German Mills Creek has an upstream drainage
greater than 125 hectares and therefore has a Regional Storm Floodplain.
Control of Flooding:
The hydraulic analysis for the proposed development was reviewed by TRCA staff and was
found to be acceptable. The proposed building will not be located with the Regional Storm
Floodplain.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, rock check dam, catch basin manhole
protection, diversion channel to work in the dry) will be implemented to ensure that the
construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project. The German Mills Creek will be
realigned and naturalized and two culverts will be installed. The in stream works will constitute
a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat. The proponent submitted
a Letter of Intent which indicated that there will be a net benefit from the project and that the
HADD will be compensated through the following measures: by mitigating the existing fish
barrier at the Leonard Street culvert, by lengthening the channel north of Leonard Street with a
meander; by incorporating fish habitat components such as woody debris structures, living
revetments, boulder treatments, pools and riparian vegetation. The authorization from the
483
Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) has been received by the TRCA. The proposed
works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 3.3 C)- Policies and Procedures for Identifying
Watercourses and Alterations of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
CFN: 30190
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For Information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: July 22, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 053/99/RH
8.1.52 YORK MAJOR HOLDINGS INC.
To alter a waterway on Lot 21, 22, 23, 24, Concession 3, (Dufferin Street North of
Major Mackenzie Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located
on the property owned by York Major Holdings Inc..
The purpose is to alter a watercourse by re- aligning and rehabilitating a tributary of the East
Don River as a component to the Eagle's Nest Golf Course proposal, which facilitates in part
the overall rehabilitation and closure of the Keele Valley Landfill, City of Vaughan..
The permit will be issued for the period of to in accordance with the following documents and
plans which form part of this permit:
• East Don Tributary Stream Corridor Regeneration, Grading and Layout Plan, Drawing
LG -1, prepared by Schollen & Company Inc., dated August 2001 revised to June 21,
2002.
• East Don Tributary Stream Corridor Regeneration Planting Plan, Drawing LP -1,
prepared by Schollen & Company Inc., dated August 2001 revised to June 21, 2002.
• East Don Tributary Stream Corridor Regeneration Details, Drawing LD -1, prepared by
Schollen & Company Inc., dated August 2001 revised to June 21, 2002.
• East Don Tributary Stream Corridor Regeneration, Site Preparation and Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan, Drawing LS -1, prepared by Schollen & Company Inc., dated
August 2001 revised to July 12, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
484
Proposal:
The proposal is to alter, realign and rehabilitate a degraded reach of the East Don River which
originates from stormwater drainage and a small wetland area adjacent to the Keele Valley
Landfill Site, in the City of Vaughan. This application represents one design component of the
overall Eagle's Nest Golf Course application of which Authority staff have been extensively
involved, most notably, with the proposed encroachment within McGill ESA lands along the
northern portion of the golf course. The review has been undertaken in conjunction with City of
Vaughan site plan application DA.01.078. Staff brought forward to the Full Authority meeting of
March 22, 2002 a report expressing concerns with the proposed encroachment, and
recommended that the Authority request the City's reconsideration of the application as
presented, and to levy a requirement for full restoration of all ESA areas prematurely cleared.
Notwithstanding, the City of Vaughan approved the site plan as submitted subject to
finalization of technical studies, permit and approvals from all applicable agencies including the
TRCA, the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry of Environment. The City has seen
merit in the proposal as presented, and recognizes the overall application as an important
component of the overall closure plan for the Keele Valley Landfill, which is scheduled to cease
operations by the end of this year.
The current application for the watercourse alteration and rehabilitation is situated on the south
portion of the property, outside the ESA limits, and has received in- principle support from
Authority staff from the onset. Staff have been working with the applicants in conjunction with
staff from the Ministry of Natural Resources to finalize the most appropriate natural channel
design and wetland enhancement plan. Originating from stormwater runoff from the landfill
and a mixed open- water, forested wetland, the watercourse flows through a moderately
forested area and an exposed reach just before it exits the subject property. The watercourse
exhibits an ill- defined channel, contains debris and other barriers to fish passage and is
experiencing erosion problems along several reaches.
The proposed realignment has been designed to correct existing problems and to provide for
long -term stability of the corridor reach with the anticipation of post -golf course development
flows rates. The existing wooded area will be maintained while implementing localized
improvements to the watercourse. Natural channel design principles have been incorporated
to create a more diverse aquatic habitat, remove barriers to fish habitat, create and enhance
refuge pools and off -line riparian wetland habitats and to extensively rehabilitate the reach with
native material plantings. In addition, habitat improvements to the upstream emergent
wetland and wet meadow are proposed. Although the proposal includes the construction of a
cart-path bridge crossing along the alignment of an existing dirt- driveway, the tributary reach
and wetland area will not be subject to intrusions from normal golf- course play.
The proposal results in a HADD (Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction) of fish habitat,
and the applicants will require authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
DFO) pursuant to Section 35 of the Federal Fisheries Act. With the necessary approvals
granted from the TRCA and the Ministry of Natural Resources (under Lakes and Rivers
Improvement Act requirements), it is anticipated that DFO will not have any additional
requirements or outstanding concerns. The applicants have provided a letter of undertaking
committing to any further minor revisions to the design should they be deemed necessary by
the DFO.
485
Control of Flooding:
All technical concerns relating to floodplain hydraulics have been incorporated within the
design to the satisfaction of Authority engineering staff. The new channel will provide for
adequate riparian storage and flow attenuation and accordingly, there are no anticipated
impacts to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
All appropriate sedimentation and erosion controls are to be employed on site during
construction. As the construction will require instream works, all off -line work areas are to be
isolated by coffer dams to prevent the migration of sediment into the creek channel. On -line
works and the installation of new channel substrate will be conducted in the dry, with flows
pumped around the work area where necessary.
Conservation of Land:
The proposal will significantly improve the habitat functions of this reach and will be enhanced
by extensive native species plantings and wetland restoration. There have been no
geotechnical or erosion hazards identified.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 3.3 - Policies and Procedures for Identifying
Watercourse and Alterations, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program policies.
CFN: 32646.A
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: October 29, 2001
Application #: 334 /01/VAUG
RES. #898/02 - AWARDING OF CONTRACT - UPGRADING HEAD OFFICE SECURITY
LIGHTING
5 Shoreham Drive. Proposal for the installation of exterior security
lighting and the associated electrical service upgrade to the Head Office
building infrastructure to facilitate the exterior lighting.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THAT HFM Electrical Co. Ltd. be awarded the contract for the installation of exterior
security lighting and associated electrical service upgrade to 5 Shoreham Drive at a total
cost of $29,061.73, including G.S.T., subject to staff being satisfied that all conditions
have been met.
CARRIED
RATIONALE
Proposals were invited from the following five contractors:
486
Bronson Electric Co. Ltd.
Brown's Line Electrical & Mechanical
Current Trend Electrical Contracting Inc.
H.F.M. Electrical Co. Ltd.
Reilly's Security Services
The proposals received are as follows:
H.F.M. Electrical Co. Ltd. $29,061.73, GST included
Reilly's Security Services $44,275.00, PST & GST included
The proposals were evaluated based on the following criteria:
• the written proposal;
• understanding of scope of work as outlined in the Terms & Reference and on site visit;
• time frame for delivery and installation
Based on the staff review using the evaluation criteria, it is recommended that the proposal
received from H.F.M. Electrical Co. Ltd. be accepted
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Funding for this project is included in the 2002 approval Budget as part of the Head Office
Retrofit. Staff had estimated the cost of the project at $25,000, plus GST.
Report prepared by: Lori Colussi, extension 5303
For Information contact: Lori Colussi, extension 5303
Date: July 15, 2002
RES.#B99/02 - FLOODPLAIN MAPPING SCANNING AND VECTORIZATION
PROJECT FOR THE DUFFINS CREEK WATERSHED
Approval to retain QSP Geographics Ltd. to convert TRCA Duffins Creek
1:2000 scale floodplain mapping to digital format in order to facilitate the
update and management of Flood and Fill Regulation Line Mapping.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THAT the Authority enter into an agreement with QSP Geographics Ltd. to complete the
conversion of 11, 1:2000 scale analogue floodplain map sheets within the Duffins Creek
Watershed at a cost of $1,100 per map sheet excluding applicable taxes.
CARRIED
487
BACKGROUND
One of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and
mapped information for use by the Authority and others, and to incorporate improved
technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order
to continue to provide accurate floodplain management information, the Water Management
Division has prepared a Floodplain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific
requirements necessary to update the Authority's current Flood and Fill Line Regulation
Mapping. Priority watersheds identified within the Work Plan include the Duffins Creek given
the extent of previous, current and future development activities.
A visual screening process has been completed to compare topographic and planimetric
features contained on the Authority's 1977 based analogue mapping with recent aerial
photography (Year 2000) to determine where significant changes warrant the preparation of
new base mapping. From this assessment, it was determined that approximately 11 analogue
map sheets within the Duffins Creek Watershed have not significantly changed subsequent to
the original date of completion. It is proposed to convert 11 analogue map sheets into digital
format in order to permit TRCA staff to continue to update base mapping information as future
changes occur and to facilitate integration with new digital mapping. For those map sheets
where significant changes have occurred, the preparation of new digital mapping is required.
A review of available technologies concluded that the most cost effective method available to
convert current TRCA analogue mapping into digital format is through a scanning and
vectorization process. The process, offered only through QSP Geographics Inc., involves
scanning the hard copy map sheets into the computer as raster images and vectorizing key
features (i.e., contours, watercourses, culverts, bridges etc.) into individual, unique lines
through proprietary software developed specifically for this application. In addition, QSP
Geographics has committed to deliver the final product within 6 weeks of project initiation and
have provided a detailed cost which represents a substantial cost savings when compared to
the preparation of new digital base mapping at approximately $5,000 per sheet.
In light of the above, it is recommended that this work be sole sourced to QSP Geographics
Ltd.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds required to complete the project are available from the Region of Durham.
Report prepared by: Marilee Gadzovski, extension 5362
For Information contact: Marilee Gadzovski, extension 5362
Date: July 16, 2002
488
RES.#B100/02 - UPPER HUMBER RIVER WATER BUDGET ANALYSIS
Sole Sourcing of Work.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THAT the consulting firm of Clarifica Inc. be retained to undertake the Upper Humber
River Water Budget Analysis, at a cost not to exceed $25,000 plus GST.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
A water budget provides an accounting of the various components of the hydrologic cycle
including precipitation, runoff, evapotranspiration, infiltration, etc. Understanding and
quantifying these components is necessary to provide the information needed to make sound
water management decisions.
The development of a water budget for the Upper Humber River will allow for various analyses
to be undertaken, particularly the assessment of impacts on low flow /base flows from land use
changes, the impacts of water takings, consideration of climate change scenarios, etc.
Furthermore, this work will partially address the need to complete a water budget as part of the
overall watershed plans which are required of municipalities as outlined in the Oak Ridges
Moraine Conservation Plan.
RATIONALE
Rather than request proposals from a number of consultants, it is proposed to sole source this
work to the consulting firm of Clarifica Inc. given that this firm's previous experience and
knowledge of water budget analyses would provide efficiencies. Clarifica Inc. recently
completed a similar analysis for the Authority for the Duffin's Creek watershed.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Clarifica Inc. has provided a detailed work plan with a quote of $25,000, exclusive of GST. Staff
are of the opinion that this amount represents good value for the extent of work requested.
Funds are available to complete this project through funding received from the Region of Peel.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The work involves the preparation of a water budget analysis for the Upper Humber River
subwatershed.
Report prepared by: Darlene Conway, extension 5278
For Information contact: Glenn MacMillan, extension 5212
Darlene Conway, extension 5278
Date: July 10, 2002
489
RES. #B101/02 - NATURALIZATION AND RELOCATION OF THE BLACK CREEK
CHANNEL THROUGH THE LAMBTON GOLF CLUB
Approval of unanticipated costs in Phase Two and award of Phase Three
of a study related to the naturalization of the Black Creek Channel and
providing storm water quality improvements to flow on the Black Creek
within the Lambton Golf Club.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Dick O'Brien
Irene Jones
THAT the firm of Dillon Consulting Ltd. be awarded Phase Three of the naturalization and
water quality study, at an upset cost of $18, 590, plus applicable taxes;
AND FURTHER THAT additional unforeseen costs of $6,331.32 experienced by the
Consultant in Phase Two of the study be approved.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At meeting #5/00, held on June 2, 2000, the Executive Committee adopted Res. #B87 /00 as
follows:
"THAT the firm of Dillon Consulting Ltd. be awarded Phase One of the naturalization and
water quality study, at an upset cost of $16,610 plus applicable taxes on the basis that
the Lambton Goff Club has committed to the additional costs associated with the Dillon
proposal."
And, at meeting # 1/01, the Executive Committee adopted Res. #B213 /00 as follows:
"THAT the firm of Dillon Consulting Ltd. be awarded Phase Two of the naturalization and
water qualify study, at an upset cost of $20,485, plus applicable taxes."
The Study on Naturalization of the Black Creek at Lambton Golf and Country Club, was
initiated in 2000 under a three party financial agreement between the City of Toronto, the
Lambton Golf and Country Club and the TRCA. The study while being directed through a
multi- member steering committee, is administered by the Conservation Authority. The study
was separated into three independent phases, a Feasibility study, Preliminary Design of
Selected Options and a Preliminary Design of a Preferred Option.
The initial Phase One, Feasibility Study was completed in 2000 and investigated the technical
and golf course feasibility issues related to naturalizing the Black Creek and providing
stormwater control within a proposed golf course pond, to treat urban runoff from the
watershed, while retaining the golfing function and providing a secondary irrigation source.
Following approval from the City and the Lambton Golf Club, the report for Phase one was
finalized and Phase two initiated.
490
The Phase Two study addressed options to the undertaking and included the initial public
consultation components in keeping with the Authority's Class E.A. process. During this phase
of the study, a number of unforeseen issues developed. The first issue related to a technical
concern expressed by a nearby condominium complex which was experiencing leakage from
several underground fuel storage tanks. The complex is under an order from the Ministry of
the Environment and Energy to contain, monitor and remove the fuel oil from around the spill
area. The condominium corporation was extremely concerned that the activities related to the
Black Creek naturalization and specifically the construction of a large pond nearby could result
in a change in the ground water flow patterns and subsequently their ability to meet their
obligations to MOEE. This issue required several meetings with the Condominium Corporation
and their consultants to resolve their concerns and ensure that our proposals would not impact
the movement of fuel within the ground water system around their buildings.
Following the initial public meeting, a number of additional issues arose which required our
arranging a separate tour of stormwater sites for the residents of the condominium complex as
well as a separate meeting with Toronto staff and the local Councilor, all of which were initially
not anticipated. As a consequence of these meetings with the public and Councilor Nunziata,
the study steering committee has been revised to add a member from the Condominium
Complex for the third phase of the study. In addition, a separate additional meeting of the
Steering Committee was held with the Golf Club to try and address concerns expressed by the
community related to the pond location. Consequently, it was agreed to carry two alternative
pond locations forward into the third phase of the study for further review along with the
preferred alignment of the naturalized Black Creek. The two pond locations are shown on the
attached figure along with the location and shape of the naturalized Black Creek watercourse
and floodplain.
Given the number of activities which were not anticipated within the Consultants proposal and
our Engineering Agreement, the Consultant has made a formal request for additional funding
to cover their costs in the amount of $ 6, 331.22. Staff of the Authority and the City of Toronto
have met with the Consultant and discussed each of the additional budget requests in detail.
Staff of the City and the Authority believe that the consultants request is representative of the
additional time and effort that arose from the unanticipated events defined above. Funds in
place from the City and the Golf Club are sufficient to cover these additional costs.
The watercourse / floodplain has been designed to ensure that no adverse flooding effects are
experienced either upstream or downstream of the site. To ensure this, the width of the
channel was widened from a width of 20 m to 60 m wide. To accomplish this, some minor golf
course alterations were necessary and have been reviewed and approved by the Executive
Committee of the club. The treatment of the low flow channel and immediate floodplain area
still will require armouring due to the streamflow velocities experienced along the study reach,
however, the Phase three design process will strive to ensure the final selected design will be
as natural looking as possible. Portions of the new floodplain will still allow for the intrusion of
some golf course features, such as fairways, however most of the open space area created will
be vegetated. The final Phase of the study will address the design aspects of integrating the
golf course within a more naturalized reach.
491
The Phase two report has recently been completed and authorization has been received from
the Golf Club to proceed with the final phase of the study. The Authority will invoice the club
directly for its share of the final Phase upon receipt of approval from the Authority.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Phase One: $16,610
Phase Two: $20,485
Phase Three: $18,590
Total Cost: $55,685 + Taxes
Funds are available for both the additional cost and for the third phase of the study within
account 113 -35.
Report prepared by: Don Haley, extension 5226
For Information contact: Don Haley, extension 5226
Date: July 15, 2002
Attachments: 1
492
Attachment 1
v
r
a
z
493
RES. #B102/02 - PARTNERSHIP WITH DUCKS UNLIMITED CANADA
Agricultural Stewardship Services
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THAT a Ducks Unlimited Canada agricultural and habitat specialist be contracted by
Toronto and Region Conservation, to provide support to Private Lands Stewardship
Initiatives, including the Rural Clean Water Program, Habitat for Wildlife Program and
review of TRCA leased lands, for the period beginning July 15, 2002 to September 20,
2002 at an upset amount of $10,000.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
With an increased demand for private land stewardship in the Toronto and Region
Conservation's jurisdiction and our limited agricultural expertise to promote and strategically
develop Best Management Practices to the farm community, we require support for the
following program deliverables;
• landowner contact;
• the development, design, and implementation of 8 habitat and agricultural Best
Management Practice projects;
• the development of a terms of reference and subsequent preparation of environmental farm
plans for priority lands within the 465 hectares (1500 acres) of TRCA leased properties;
• development of an Agricultural Non Point Source (AGNPS) model in 4 subwatersheds
within the Duffins, Rouge, Humber and Etobicoke Mimico watersheds; and the creation of 4
agricultural committees to assist with AGNPS implementation;
• 2 Best Management Practice workshops;
• mentoring of Toronto and Region Conservation (TRCA) staff during field and landowner
contact portions of the agreement.
We will require an agricultural specialist to dedicate the appropriate time resources to complete
the deliverables as defined in a letter of agreement for the allotted time period. TRCA will assist
with the development of the deliverables, provide office space at Boyd Field Centre and
Bruce's Mill Conservation Area, administrative support, mapping, office telephone, printing and
fax services. Stewardship staff will also provide public outreach and communications expertise
to support the deliverables as outlined in the letter of agreement.
Two project leaders will be appointed, one from each organization, to coordinate and lead all
matters relating to the letter of agreement. This reporting mechanism will ensure consistent
direction and clear communication. An assessment of the pilot project will be completed within
60 days after the field season, to evaluate the success of this model and partnership. If at the
end of the agreement period, the decision is made to extend the partnership, and if financial
resources are available, an addendum to the letter of agreement will be drafted by both parties.
RATIONALE
For the past 5 years TRCA has worked toward developing a partnership with Ducks Unlimited
Canada through a variety of education, project implementation and staff training programs.
494
Ducks Unlimited Canada is a conservation organization with more than 60 years experience in
wetland conservation, education and research. Their efforts not only provide a benefit to North
American waterfowl, but have also successfully targeted habitat for hundreds of wildlife
species, improved clean drinking water, enhanced flood protection and contributed to nation
wide recreational economic activity. One of their most successful programs is LandCARE, a
habitat conservation program which assists private landowners with wildlife friendly farming
techniques and related practices to conserve land and water resources.
More recently, Ducks Unlimited Canada provided their expertise at our Wetlands, Woodlands
and Wood Ducks Conservation Seminar; provided staff resources and display material for a
Stewardship Forum at the Kortright Centre for Conservation; assisted with the duck banding
program at Tommy Thompson Park; participated in our Duffins and Carruthers Creek
Watershed Task Force community consultations; toured Duffins Marsh to assist with the
development of a coastal wetland restoration plan; and provided extensive printed materials
and posters for our Stewardship Resource Centre.
Ducks Unlimited Canada Staff, will provide TRCA with a wealth of information on sustainable
agricultural practices, as well as an effective conduit into the farm communities within our
watersheds. This is an exceptional opportunity to utilize many years of hands -on experience
related to private land stewardship to ensure the protection and enhancement of rural lands
within the TRCA jurisdiction.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding is available in the Rural Clean Water Program, Agricultural Non Point Source
Stewardship Program and Wetlands for Wildlife accounts, 117 -59, 117 -60 and 126 -60
respectively.
Report prepared by: Patricia Lowe, extension 5365
For Information contact: Patricia Lowe, extension 5365
Date: July 11, 2002
RES.#B103/02 - AWARDING OF CONTRACT - SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION OF NEW
CARPET
5 Shoreham Drive. Proposal for the removal and disposal of the existing
carpet, and for the supply and installation of new carpet for the Head
Office facility at 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Maria Augimeri
Lorna Bissell
495
THAT Resource Interiors Inc. be awarded the contract for the removal of the existing
carpet and for the supply and installation of the Interface Carpet Tile, Transformation
Product at a total cost of $73,605.30, including GST, subject to staff being satisfied that
all conditions have been met.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
As part of the Head Office Retrofit Project, the present carpeting needs to be replaced. The
carpet is approximately 16 years old and is now functionally obsolete, due to excessive wear
and tear. It has also exceeded its originally expected life span. The carpet can no longer be
cleaned properly and is showing signs of breakage.
It is recommended that we replace the current carpet with carpet tile, in order that we can avoid
major disruption to office staff and at the same time incorporate it with our office restructuring.
As part of the major facility retrofit budget (City of Toronto) TRCA began investigating options
for replacement of the Head Office carpeting. Several factors were considered in terms of
TRCA needs and objectives as follows:
• to improve the head office work environment and demontrate the Authority's
commitment to environmentally sustainable solutions and products.
• the new carpet should be highly functional related to the unique type of wear that
occurs from our outdoor work, exposure to heavy dirt and high traffic zones;
• the new carpet should provide as long a life as is possible based on the current
technology to maximize cost effectiveness;
• the new carpet should demonstrate a sustainable, "green" alternative to
conventional carpeting;
• the new carpet preferably has low VOC (volatile organic compounds) emissions to
be considerate of staff wellness
• the disruption during installation must bq minimized.
Carpets are known to emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs), accumulate molds and dust,
impairing indoor air quality. Therefore the selection of new carpet would also enhance the
TRCA's work environment both aesthetically and in terms of staff well- being.
The TRCA has been aware of Interface Flooring Systems as a leading company demonstrating
sustainability for some time. Interface staff have participated in various living city related events
demonstrating their support.
On this basis, the TRCA invited Interface Inc. to present their product and pricing line to staff
and were very impressed by the quality, life and sustainability of the product.
496
Transformation is the carpet tile that is being recommended as it is a carpet tile that is
composed of mainly recycled material. These carpet tiles are easy and fast to install and
provide the easiest repair /replacement option. The quoted price includes an additional 5%
over and above the required amount of tiles to ensure a supply is available on site for
replacement in the future, if required.
RATIONALE
Interface flooring is the largest manufacturer of modular carpet tiles. While they are a global
company, they are the only Canadian manufacturer of carpet tiles with its Belleville Mill the only
ISO 9002 and 14001 certified. Therefore their carpet is locally made.
Ray Anderson the CEO of Interface Inc is one of the noted pioneers of The Natural Step for
Business, an approach to business that works towards continuous environmental
improvements by decreasing resource inputs and waste outputs in the production process.
This company also applies the concept of "biomimicry" in their production processes using the
analogy of a forest to design its modular carpet system.
To date Interface has been on the leading edge of carpet manufacturing and sustainable
enterprise. Their modular carpet system permits easy installation with low disruption to staff,
penodic rotation or exchange of individual carpet tiles to distribute wearing and increase the
carpet's life. They have invented an antimicrobial coating which inhibits mold. Their carpet has
been recognized by the Ontario Lung Association as "among the best in the world, setting a
standard of low emissions and contributing as one of the factors in a healthy indoor office
environment." Interface carpeting is EcoLogo certified to inform consumers that the product is
identified nationally as being less impacting on the environment while meeting exceptional
safety and performance standards.
Using The Natural Step, Interface applies a life -cycle analysis to its production process. This
means that their products are reclaimed after their useful life, broken down, separated, and the
backing (which is 100% recyclable) is returned to the new products. This results in huge
savings to the deposition of carpet products in land fills. By adopting a very efficient
manufacturing process, Interface has managed to reduce their material consumption by 15%
and another 5% in waste on a per unit product basis. More information about other
environmental product benefits can be found in the attached product summary. (Doing Well by
Doing Good). More information can also be obtained from the Interface Flooring Systems web
site at http: / /www.interfaceinc.com_
Interface products are installed throughout the City of Toronto, in the Department of Indian and
Northern Affairs, Pollution Probe, Metro Library, and numerous private offices.
In assessing the full cost and benefits of purchasing Interface carpeting for the TRCA's head
office, it is necessary to consider a full range of factors:
1) As with all leading -edge technologies, the initial output cost is slightly higher. However
the life of the product is enhanced using the modular system. Only individual tiles will
need to be replaced extending the life of the product well beyond its already 15 year
warranty.
497
2) The benefits to staff wellness and potential productivity are enhanced by this healthy,
low emission product adding unquantifiable value. The TRCA, as part of a separate
project, will be monitoring the impacts on office air quality resulting from this carpet
change.
3) The environmental externalities normally associated with resource inputs and waste to
land fill sites are built into the cost of this carpet representing the true cost of
production.
Based on the high performance, recognition by third party certification programs,
demonstration of sustainability principles in business, local production and long product life,
the TRCA would like to install Interface carpeting within our head office location.
Proposals were invited from the following dealers for the removal of existing carpet and for the
supply and installation of the Interface Carpet Tile:
Dreschsel Contract Carpet Services
Kent - Leckie Flooring Ltd.
Resource Interiors Inc.
The proposals received are as follows:
Drechsel Contract Carpet Services
Kent - Leckie Flooring Ltd.
Resource Interiors Inc.
$80,830.00 including PST and GST
$76,200.15, including PST and GST
$73,605.30, including PST and GST
The proposals were evaluated based on the following criteria:
• the written proposal
• understanding of scope of work as outlined in the Terms & References and on site visit;
• time frame for delivery and installation
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this project is included in the 2002 approved budget as part of the Head Office
Retrofit.
Report prepared by: Lori Colussi, extension 5303
For Information contact: Lori Colussi, extension 5303
Date: July 16, 2002
498
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:35 a.m., on July 26, 2002.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
'
THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #8/02
September 6, 2002
The Executive Committee Meeting #8/02, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office, on
Friday, September 6, 2002. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:33
a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Ron Moeser Member
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
REGRETS
Lorna Bissell
Member
RES. #B104 /02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Ron Moeser
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #7/02, held on July 26, 2002, be approved.
DELEGATION
(a)
CARRIED
Joanne & Guido Marinucci of 9 Weller Crescent, Maple, speaking in regards to item 7.1
- Request for Disposal of Authority Owned Lands.
RES. #B105 /02 - DELEGATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Jim McMaster
THAT above -noted delegation (a) be heard and received.
CARRIED
500
SECTION+- ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #B106/02 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS
Rear of 8 Bevan Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York
CFN 33029. Receipt of a request to consider disposing of a parcel of
TRCA land at the rear of 8 Bevan Road, located south of Major
Mackenzie Drive, west of Keele Street in the Maple area of the City of
Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Jim McMaster
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority lands located at the rear of 8 Bevan Road located south of Major
Mackenzie Drive, west of Keele Street in the Maple area of the City of Vaughan, Regional
Municipality of York, be retained for conservation purposes.
BACKGROUND CARRIED
TRCA is in receipt of a request from Guido and Joanne Marinucci to consider selling
approximately 0.3 hectares (0.7 acres) of TRCA land at the rear of their property at 8 Bevan
Road, located south of Major Mackenzie Drive, west of Keele Street in the Maple area of the
City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York.
The Members of the Executive Committee at meeting #3/02 held on April 5, 2002 adopted
resolution #B31/02.
THAT the request to consider disposing of a parcel of TRCA land at the rear of 7 Bevan
Road located south of Major Mackenzie Drive, west of Keele Street in the Maple area of the
City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, be referred to TRCA staff for review in
accordance with established TRCA policies;
AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future
date recommending further action.
This request was circulated to TRCA's Development Services staff, Region of York and the City
of Vaughan. The following were the comments received:
• TRCA's Development Services Staff - The subject lands were acquired as part of the
conditions of development approvals for the adjacent draft Plan of Subdivision situated
across the watercourse corridor under draft plan 19T -95015 - Cedarland Properties Ltd.
The subject lands are part of Block 30 on Plan 65M -3229.
The limit of Block 30 represents the top -of -bank as staked and approved by TRCA staff and
represents the limit of the valley /stream corridor in accordance with Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Policy (VSCMP). The lands are also wholly within TRCA's Regulated
Area pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158.
501
• Region of York - The Region has no interest in the property.
• City of Vaughan - The City has no comments or objections concerning the sale of these
lands.
The Members of the Executive Committee at meeting #5/02 held on June 7, 2002 adopted
resolution #B56/02.
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT item 7.4 - Request for Disposal of
Authority Owned Lands, Rear of 7 Bevan Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of
York, be deferred.
Staff were requested to conduct a further site inspection which was done on June 25, 2002.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Mr. and Mrs. Marinucci have advised that they have completed the purchase of the lands at 8
Bevan Road on July 31, 2002. They have also advised that they have learned that the address
of the property is actually 8 Bevan Road not 7 Bevan Road. Immediately after the Executive
Committee meeting on June 7, 2002 Mr. and Mrs. Marinucci corrected staff in respect to the
fact they are purchasing just under 1 hectare of land which is substantially larger than the lot
discussed at the meeting by staff. Approximately 1/3 of the property is regulated by TRCA
under Ontario Regulation 158 and the property is zoned R1 permitting residential uses. Mr.
and Mrs. Marinucci could build their house at the location identified on the attached sketch as
"existing house" without obtaining a permit from TRCA as it is not regulated.
All TRCA lands in this area, including the subject property are zoned OS1. This zoning does
not permit any buildings or structures other than for conservation or flood control projects.
Limited recreational and institutional uses are permitted, subject to them being open to the
general public.
Generally, this reach of the West Don River from Rutherford Road to the subject property is
owned from top of bank to top of bank by either the City of Vaughan or TRCA. It would appear
the only anomaly are the properties located directly south of the subject property on Lancer
Drive. This is an old development that was approved prior to TRCA adopting its Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Policy. With the exception of a parkette, the valley corridor north
of the subject property appears to still be in private ownership. This includes a church and day
care facility. This is also part of the old community of Maple.
This issue before the Executive Committee is whether or not the subject land should be sold.
Even if the property was sold, and Mr. and Mrs. Marinucci wanted to build a house on the
subject property or on the portion of the adjacent property which is regulated, they are still
required to submit an application for a permit which would be considered by the Executive
Committee at a future date.
The Members of the Executive Committee at meeting #7/02 held on July 26, 2002 adopted
Resolution #B90/02.
502
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Item 7.1 - Request for Disposal of
Authority Owned Lands, Rear of 7 Bevan Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of
York, be deferred to Executive Committee Meeting #8/02, to be held on September 6,
2002.
A further meeting was held on site involving Mr. and Mrs. Mannucci, their Engineer Mr. Don
Moss, Mayor Michael DiBiase and TRCA staff. Mr. and Mrs. Marinucci indicated at the time that
if TRCA decided not to sell the land to them would TRCA consider the following:
(a) Reducing the 10 metre set back required from top -of -bank for their proposed house.
This will reduce the vegetation Toss on their property;
(b) Allow them to undertake planting on the adjacent TRCA lands;
(c) The possibility of locating a fence on the west limit of TRCA lands they are requesting to
purchase;
(d) Having discussions with them regarding the private use and /or lease of the subject
property.
Two plans illustrating this location are attached.
WORK TO BE DONE
Staff will work with Mr. and Mrs. Marinucci to reduce the set back requirements to 5 metres to
allow for the preservation of the existing vegetation on their property. The construction of the
house will be subject to a future report to the Executive Committee relating to an application for
a permit under Ontario Regulation 158.
Staff will also provide Mr. and Mrs. Marinucci permission to undertake planting at their expense
on TRCA land subject to Mr. and Mrs. Marinucci providing a planting plan that is satisfactory to
TRCA staff.
Staff do not support any fencing other than on the property line and do not support the private
use or lease of the subject property.
Report prepared by: Michael Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Michael Fenning, extension 5223
Date: August 21, 2002
Attachments: 2
503
Attachment 1
RE:
REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS
Rear of 7 Bevan Road, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of
York
CFN 33029
E 427
,onservation
1ORONIOAND R[G /ON
TRCA LANDS
SUBJECT PROPERLY
LANDS TO BE ACQUIRED
BY MR. & MRS. MARINUCCI
504
Attachment 2
-a
me
F
PP II if
fiR: 1111
.1 if i
1
E
*_...
t . 1
__ s
t&I
It
505
RES.#B107/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Etobicoke Creek Watershed
1900 Sismet Road, City of Mississauga. Hubertus Investments Limited,
CFN 33439. Acquisition of a parcel of land located on the south side of
Sismet Road, west of Creekbank Road, City of Mississauga, Regional
Municipality of Peel under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and
Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", floodplain and conservation component,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Jim McMaster
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.258 hectares (0.638 acres) more
or less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of land be purchased from Hubertus
Investments Limited, said land being part of Block H, Registered Plan 924, City of
Mississauga, Regional Municipality of Peel, on the south side of Sismet Road, West of
Creekbank Road and further described as Part 1 and 11 on Reference Plan 43R- 27232;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, TRCA Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural Heritage
Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005.
As a condition of approval of a severance of a lot by the Committee of Adjustment for the City
of Mississauga, Hubertus Investments Limited are required to convey to TRCA lands below the
stable slope line for the protection of a tributary stream and valley corridor associated with the
Etobicoke Creek.
RATIONALE
The subject property is bounded by the Etobicoke Creek valley to the east and by a tributary to
the Etobicoke Creek to the south, and falls within TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition.
The acquisition of the property will provide long term protection for the stream corridor feature.
506
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The parcel being acquired will be turned over to the City of Mississauga under the terms of the
existing management agreement.
Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Tom Campitelli, extension 5335
Date: August 20, 2002
Attachments: 1
507
Attachment 1
RE: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Etobicoke Creek
Watershed
1900 Siemet Road, City of Mississauga
Hubertus Investments Limited
CFN 33439
1
ti,.
1
I
i
E 1/2
1
r
bnseot�vaiion
WAWA
508
TRCA LANDS
SUBJECT PROPERTY
i
}
I
I
RES. #B108/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component/Don River Watershed
Don - Greenbelt Developments Inc., CFN 33454. Purchase of property
located south of Lawrence Avenue East, west of the Don Valley Parkway,
City of Toronto (Midtown Community), under the "Natural Heritage Lands
Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005" Flood Plain and
Conservation Component, Don River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Jim McMaster
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.905 acres (0.366 hectares), more
or less, of vacant land, be purchased from Don - Greenbelt Developments Inc., being Part
of Lot 3, Concession 3 East of Yonge Street, and Part of Block S, Registered Plan 4566
and designated as Blocks 1 and 19 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by J. D.
Barnes Limited under their Reference No.: 01 -21- 613 -00, City of Toronto (Midtown
Community), located south of Lawrence Avenue East, west of the Don Valley Parkway;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be Instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, TRCA Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approving the Natural Heritage
Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Don River
Watershed.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
The lands will be turned over to the City of Toronto under our management agreement. Lands
under this agreement are exempt from taxation.
509
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: August 23, 2002
Attachments: 1
510
Attachment 1
/r
moo
�• yti.1,Atl \�11�a� �� ,11*
� SI ILLS111114 \\\ �/
bi nu i�,r� aim/
,111 viiv%
'� •in�lli A� \T 61t'f1
I■1�1.)s uLL511 \�a _• �V�Y
r.J i1\lo 110 NwSP.,�r� r
.crmmC J \R1�N.:QI
♦! /4-1741.14' 1 e , 'd 11�1\i��
/Ii� .f 946 \UA'�
r. Ali /far r/i15Sm'rlM °a�`
.._•,,. . %r �rril,.�MYril 4 %,
•4 i L!S9•O.11V`� \ ■�grain1� 1
�� :�. .►�6 \`''ftL1SI_oa1�1fS�6:�(h/ JJJ
LLU Pr., �-e \\,' ► &Nl'i1101CSS1�6�11J�1
!r ,e i `, 11'•1\6R.�SlS ► \I17.%I�R
--j u% /s� "�' ` -=.... "41:1 \S INIFISS.`ANNI p) 11 isIBLVANT-.14-iv41/Jr4
Stew
„Al. mar
♦,��sir:�: Cdr
q 4 c'Itidt i1. 9:
SUBJECT PRO' = LL •,. (� 111/1111 .
SS
A..1:72:1Eta
1/5'J4. 1J �.Yi[IlU11Ul�lil6r;3a�
I'J�J�� [I \`wlQaiSa ��a � - .ArixQ•'a
E4I/ 19g11♦ "x+-�1;� ZNIXIONESIREE74 PAW er L d� 4 -011111111tarr:a
realil irE
P / / ■ 1`PEd@'e:a°%19.
RE: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Pialn and Conservation Component/Don River Watershed
Don - Greenbelt Developments Inc.
CFN 33454
511
'AIWA
TRCA LANDS
CRY PROPERTY.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
RES. #B109/02 - RENEWAL OF INSTALLATION AGREEMENT WITH THE GREATER
TORONTO AIRPORT AUTHORITY
Vicinity of Acacia Avenue, City of Toronto, CFN 23033. Receipt of a
request from the City of Toronto for approval of the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority, for renewal of an existing installation agreement.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Jim McMaster
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is the owner of Part of Lot 12, Concession VI and Lot 247,
Registered Plan 1842, City of Toronto;
AND WHEREAS the subject lands have been turned over to the City of Toronto, in
accordance with the terms of an agreement dated June 14, 1961;
THAT the Authority approve renewal of the installation agreement with the Greater
Toronto Airport Authority for a term of 5 years commencing April 1, 2002, on the basis as
set out in the Delegated Approval Form, Tracking No. 2002 -080, approved on May 29,
2002, by the City of Toronto Chief Administrative Officer;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
take whatever action may be required to give affect thereto, including obtaining
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
On February 15, 1979 the Authority, with the agreement of The Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto (now the City of Toronto), entered into an agreement with the Ministry of Transport,
representing Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (now the Greater Toronto Airport
Authority), authorizing Transport Canada (now the Greater Toronto Airport Authority) to install a
pole- mounted monitoring facility to record aircraft noise on Authority lands on Acacia Avenue,
North York District, City of Toronto.
The agreement was continuously renewed by the Authority until March 31, 1994. The Authority
then turned over to Metro (now City of Toronto) the yearly administration of the licence, and
since April 1, 1994 Metro (now City of Toronto) has been responsible for its management.
The last licence was for a term of 3 years, which expired March 31, 2002 and included an
annual licence fee of $350 for Year 1, $400 for Year 2, and $450 for Year 3, net plus all
applicable taxes and costs related to the licenced area. Either party has the right to terminate
the licence at any time upon giving at least ninety (90) days' prior written notice to the other.
A sketch illustrating the Authority owned land effected is appended for the information of the
Members.
512
FINANCIAL DETAILS
In accordance with the terms and conditions of the management agreement, no revenue or
expense will be incurred in this instance by the Authority. The licence fee for the 5 year period
will be $500 for Year 1, $550 for Year 2, $600 for Year 3, $650 for Year 4, and $700 for Year 5.
The City of Toronto staff have advised that this proposal is satisfactory to the City, which will
receive the revenues generated.
Report prepared by: Lori Colussi, extension 5303
For Information contact: Lori Colussi, extension 5303
Date: August 06, 2002
Attachments: 2
513
Attachment 1
RE:
RENEWAL OF INSTALLATION AGREEMENT WITH THE GREATER %1M' TRCA LANDS
TORONTO AIRPORT AUTHORITY ;76 1 * 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY
- vicinity of Acacia Avenue, CIty of Toronto
CFN 23033 •1 \\ \ A A
514
Attachment 2
•� GiSTERED PLAN 1842.
)NC1rSS1ON VI WEST OF YON GE STREET
NORTH YORK 1 COUNTY OF YORK
Sc ALE i' . 40'
•
} gt11ct
rs
P.3
4.p 4'1/1.44. :um
X1444410 ilpta9
• 1t AQ
�, R
M - j1 "'1` F�,1NflOµ qt pAe 1 anon //
r1
S - •' �K � "6.1 was ;1sfle"Autism yaTfir,
far s+a ltT•tl sttsu red
73.1e61,4P
Mir 3/ 3d [PM
•;t1:
11. •
.. •1
11 E. AR0.E LOT 234
tr,
PIMP
• Feat•gi %Ni�
i
• Al1ES,* isl Acs.
•
••
•
• .OF LOT 12 a CON. '
PART
5Ubjec
properly
153.17: Rl}'oeto afl fir
.. -1451 ls• It 1�W%t lresl .
on wrG1
�•
UT 111
0. at 11 A
t.is . E�v 1• •
;001. • ' SA ' •
•
•g •
• p s
$d
SYPal 'a`1..
■lQ
a S-
M`
$1.3. zt...
'ee.t.
b
1rM •
ItEAIAAM
K E. mEl1MAH
.JIIS1.0 It.etP
•
1. s.t it
•
JL.)..1ur•r n1'�
90 10.104 •91.•1r 1 * .11...1r IM1.r r
515
RES. #8110/02 - THE LIVING CITY CENTRE AT KORTRIGHT
Proposal for Consulting Services to Support the Realization of the Living
City Centre. The TRCA has received a proposal from Enerlife Consulting
for services to support the realization of the Living City Centre. The work
proposed by Enerlife is needed to move the project forward in this crucial
stage of planning.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Jim McMaster
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Enerlife Consulting be hired to
complete project management services in accordance with Phase I of their proposal
within 2002 to support the realization of the Living City Centre, at the cost of $56,610;
AND FURTHER THAT Enerlife be contracted to complete the full proposal in 2003 at a
total cost of approximately $135,000, subsequent to the satisfactory completion of Phase
I and the availability of funding in 2003.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, through its Living City vision, intends to take a
leadership role in developing the GTA as one of the most sustainable and livable urban
communities in the world. The Living City Centre (formerly known as the Centre for
Sustainable Living) development at Kortright is to be the strategic heart of the vision, a window
into the Living City, promoting the implementation of sustainable urban development and
community living.
Over the past two years, a considerable amount of thought and effort by TRCA staff and
outside parties have gone into considering what the Living City Centre will be, and how it will
come into being.
Enerlife Consulting proposes to complement the TRCA's management and staff with its
expertise, person power, community knowledge, contacts and reputation, to help develop the
Living City vision into a tangible and measurable reality through the Living City Centre.
A preliminary proposal by Enerlife Consulting was taken to the Management Committee and it
was received favourably by them. The first $5,000 has been authorized to assist with the
Kortright Building Assessment and other aspects. (The building assessment was approved by
the Executive Committee in Meeting #4/02, May 3, 2002.)
RATIONALE
The development for the Living City Centre has reached a crucial stage, in which a multitude of
skills are needed to move the project forward. Enerlife Consulting, with its president Ian Jarvis
and three principals, will bring a unique blend of capabilities and experience needed to help
TRCA develop Kortright Centre's facilities and programs to reflect the sustainable living
component of the Living City vision.
516
The project team at Enerlife has strong connections with the business sector, and with all levels
of governments. They have been responsible for a number of the largest energy efficiency and
sustainable development projects in North America.
Enerlife will work closely with York University, which is continuing its own leadership role in
sustainability on the university campus. It is also intended to retain a graduate student from
York to perform research and other tasks. (see attachment 1 for a detailed description of the
project team)
SCOPE OF PROJECT
The scope of work comprises a range of interrelated and mutually supportive areas:
• Test, develop and articulate the Living City vision, and the role of the Living City Centre at
Kortright, through iterative consultation with the TRCA Management Committee, TRCA staff,
including Kortright staff, community leaders and other organizations, to create a compelling
case for public and private- sector engagement and support.
• Identify and profile prospective partners, and build effective working partnerships with
business, institutional, government and civil society organizations which share and can
contribute to this vision for the GTA.
• Develop the rationale, strategy, objectives, business case and work plan for the
development and operation of the Living City Centre and related projects.
• Plan and support fund - raising initiatives (with the Conservation Foundation) such that the
Living City Centre and related projects will be self- funding.
• Manage the work of consultants and design teams to ensure that planning and
development move forward in an appropriate, cost - effective and timely manner.
• Develop a plan for the Tong -term, sustainable operation and growth of the Living City
Centre.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
In order to most effectively manage the assignment and budget, it is proposed to define
specific tasks and deliverables with assigned budgets as the work unfolds. Following is the
proposed overall scope of work. Subsequent tasks may be submitted to the TRCA for review
and approval as needs and opportunities evolve over time.
1. Vision for the Living City Centre
Review the suggested vision statements drafted to date. Prepare a 1 -2 page draft
statement of the Living City Centre vision, together with suggested implications,
tentative roles, and illustrative initiatives derived from the vision. In other words, based
upon this vision for the Centre, these are the kinds of things which it will be and do to
support the vision. Test, modify and finalize this document through consultation with
the Management Committee, TRCA staff, key players in the surrounding community,
and other external advisors, to create an approved vision document with broad internal
and external support. In particular, ensure that the vision is compelling and deemed
worthy of support by major business corporations.
517
2. Program Design and Management
Prepare, manage and regularly update the work plan and budget for the overall Living
City Centre development over a two -year period beginning in September, 2002.
Prepare communications, presentations and reports to Senior Management and
Authority Boards as required. Develop a directional plan for the long -term, sustainable
operation and growth of the Living City Centre.
3. Building Assessment
Review and adapt the terms of reference for the assessment of the existing Kortright
building to reflect the approved vision, and manage the successful completion of the
contract with the company awarded the work. In particular, address space use
adaptability, and access to appropriate technology to support the vision.
4. Partnership Development
Build upon the existing contact database to develop and maintain a directory of
prospective partners within Kortright (Earth Rangers), from the surrounding community
(including municipal government, school board, churches and developers), the GTA
(including utility companies, businesses, municipal governments, universities, colleges,
school boards, other centres, non - profit groups, and associations), and provincial and
federal governments and organizations. Follow up with the June 28/00 Roundtable
participants who expressed interest in helping. Establish a communications program,
including additions to and updates of the TRCA website, which will engage target
organizations and individuals, and invite input to the Centre's concept plan and case for
support. Contact and liaise with key stakeholders with a view to establishing formal
partnerships for the development of the Living City Centre.
5. Living City Centre Plan
Prepare the rationale, planning process, timelines, and initial budget for the concept
development of the Centre and related projects, considering previous needs
assessment, market analysis, research and reports, and in consultation with the TRCA.
Include prior work done on market analysis and the business case. Manage the
development of the program and concept definition, including: assessing the contract
with Verburg & Associates in Tight of the vision and anticipated sources of revenue;
hiring and directing consultants; establishing and coordinating internal and external
design teams; reporting on progress; researching other initiatives and best practices;
ensuring regulatory compliance; and coordinating the consultations with stakeholders.
6. Centre Development
Manage the preparation of the design brief and graphic presentation of the Living City
Centre by the selected design team, which will implement the program and concept
plan in support of the approved vision.
7. Sustainable Development of the Surrounding Area
Prepare a concept brief for the development of the area surrounding Kortright, in
consultation with the City, local developers, community leaders and the school board,
which these parties would be willing to consider in support of the Living City Centre
vision. Establish regional, provincial and federal sources of funding and resources to
support a more progressive approach to the local area development.
518
8. Fund - Raising
Work with the Conservation Foundation to manage the completion of the case for
support for the Living City Centre. Undertake targeted fundraising initiatives, including
writing and presenting proposals.
9. Indicators, Benchmarking, Measurement and Evaluation
Build upon the extensive work already being done elsewhere to establish sustainability
indicators and current performance for the GTA. Conduct research and determine best
practices in this field. Obtain available information to benchmark the GTA against other
major North American and international urban regions. Specify recommended
additional research work to further advance the benchmarking and evaluation of the
GTA.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Phase One Budget and Timelines
The following table presents the tasks described above, their overall estimated costs, and the
proposed firm fee and deliverables for a first phase of the work which will take place over a
three -month period (expected to be from September to November, 2002).
Task
Overall Fee
Sept. 2002 -
Dec.2003
(Estimated)
Phase One
2002
(Firm Fee)
Deliverables
1. Vision
$6,650
$6,650
Approved vision document
2A. Program Design
$5,465
$5,465
Overall work plan and budget
2B. Program Management
$13, 140
$1,315
Management reports to Nov /02
3. Building Assessment
$3,685
$3,685
Completion of consultant report
4A. Develop Partnerships
$12,475
$6,240
Directory and key meeting reports
4B. Communication Plan
$5,950
$2,975
Written plan and website update
5A. Development Plan
$13,000
$13,000
Concept development plan and budget
5B. Plan Management
$10,700
$5,350
Consultants hired and reports to Nov /02
6. Manage Design Brief
$5,270
$0
7. Surrounding Area
$11,125
$2,780
Meeting reports, draft concept brief
8A. Case for Support
$5,330
$5,330
Camera -ready document
8B. Fund - raising
$15,275
$3,820
Database and meeting reports
9. Indicators
$23,600
$0
Database and meeting reports
Totals
$131,665
$56,610
Report prepared by: Lisa King, extension 5386 and Anne Reesor, extension 5202.
For Information contact: Lisa King, extension 5386
Date: August 26, 2002
Attachments: 1
519
Attachment 1
Enerlife Consulting
Project Team
Enerlife Consulting brings together the range of knowledge, experience and reputation
necessary to undertake this assignment. Their backgrounds are in business, education and
the non - profit sector. They are based in Toronto and are deeply involved in the community.
They have extensive backgrounds in sustainable community development. They have strong
connections with the business sector, and with federal, provincial, regional and municipal
governments. They have been responsible for a number of the largest energy efficiency and
sustainable development projects in North America.
In the field of sustainable communities, they have been responsible for the development and
growth of the Green Communities Association across Canada. In this capacity, they have a
deep understanding of how communities work, change and get things done. They can also
draw upon the wealth of initiatives undertaken by different cities which have tackled the
challenges of sustainable development. They were also the architects of Sustainable
Peterborough, a program dating back to 1998 which engages the private, public and non - profit
sectors in a community -wide effort to improve energy efficiency. The driving forces behind the
success if this program -- economic development as well as a cleaner environment -- provide a
useful model for the Living City Centre. They also have strong relationships with Toronto's
Better Buildings Partnership and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, which are
important potential sources of resources.
The Enerlife principals who will be directly responsible for this assignment are:
lan A. Jarvis, B.Sc., P.Eng., President
During the 1990's, lan was CEO of Rose Technology Group, one of the leading energy
performance contractors in North America. Rose was sold to Cinergy Corp in December,
1999. Under Ian's leadership the company expanded successfully from its base in Toronto
across Canada and into the United States. Rose's many awards speak to the leadership role it
took in energy efficiency and broader sustainability issues. The company was one of the
designated contractors for the City of Toronto's Better Buildings Partnership, and developed
the Sustainable Peterborough community project which continues today. Ian worked with
David Bell to design President Marsden's Task Force on Sustainability. He is a director of
Milton Hydro, and, supporting fundraising from the corporate sector. Ian is also a member of
the National Advisory Council on Energy Efficiency, of the Government of Canada delegation to
the 1999 Hemispheric Energy Ministers' Conference in New Orleans, and Premier Hamm's
energy policy task group in 2001.
520
Ann Vanstone, B.A., Principal
Ann is a graduate of the University of Toronto, and served for many years as a school board
trustee in Toronto. She was board chair during the 1990's leading up to amalgamation.
During this time Ann was deeply involved in the social and political issues of a large urban
school board. She was also responsible for major facility renewal and energy efficiency
projects, and their impact on students and staff. Ann subsequently co- chaired the provincial
Education Improvement Commission and the Effective Schools Task Force. She maintains a
high profile and strong reputation with school board, municipal and provincial government
officials throughout Ontario. Her work over the past several years leading transformational
initiatives in the highly complex and emotionally charged education sector provides invaluable
insight into the challenges of sustainable development.
Don Osborne, B.A.Sc., M.B.A., P.Eng., Principal
From 1988 to 1999, Don served as Vice President, Operations for Rose Technology Group,
responsible for the development and delivery of large -scale facility renewal projects in
government, institutional and commercial buildings across North America. His 30 -year career
has been centred on project management, working with engineers, architects, contractors and
clients to deliver high quality projects on time and on budget. He is a recognized authority on
planning, organizing and managing complex projects, and instituted Rose's ISO Quality
Management System to ensure consistent quality of service. The growth and success which
Rose experienced over this period reflects Don's ability to engage and direct professional
people in pursuit of a common goal.
David McLeod, B.A., Principal
David has 25 years' experience in the business and not - for - profit sectors, in the fields of
business management, marketing, strategic planning, project management and partnership
development. Over the past decade, he first developed Peterborough Green -Up into one of
the most successful community -based environmental organizations in Canada, and then
moved on as Director of Development to guide the national expansion of the Green
Communities Association in establishing ten community groups in cities and towns across
Canada. David has a history of practical innovation in designing and managing environmental
programs, including fund - raising with federal, provincial and local government departments.
Enerlife will work closely with York University, which is continuing its own leadership role in
sustainability on the university campus. Professors David Bell, David Wheeler and Peter Victor
will be among the York advisors and contributors to the work performed. It is also intended to
retain a graduate student from York to perform research and other tasks.
521
RES.#B111/02 - FRENCHMAN'S BAY WATERSHED REHABILITATION PROJECT
Collaborative Agreement. To receive approval to sign the collaborative
agreement (Oct. 1/02 - Sept. 31/07) for the Frenchman's Bay Watershed
Rehabilitation Project subject to receipt of Ontario Trillium Foundation
funding through PESCA.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Jim McMaster
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the collaborative agreement with
PESCA (Pickering Eastshore Community Centre Association), the City of Pickering,
Ontario Power Generation - Pickering Nuclear and the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) for the period of October 1, 2002 - September 31, 2007 as required by
the Ontario Trillium Foundation be approved;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to take the necessary actions to implement the
agreement including the signing of documents subject to PESCA receiving written
confirmation of Ontario Trillium Foundation funding.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Frenchman's Bay watershed, located in the City of Pickering with a current population of
47,000 people, covers approximately 2200 km2. The watershed is comprised of several natural
features including four creeks (Amberlea, Dunbarton, Pine and Krosno), an open -water bay, a
barrier beach, open meadows, remnant woodlots and several wetland areas; two of which
have been deemed as Provincially Significant Wetlands, Frenchman's Bay and Hydro Marsh.
The Frenchman's Bay Watershed Rehabilitation Project began in September 1998 as a
two -year community driven environmental initiative when EcoAction2000 granted funds in the
amount of $69,000. Since that time the project has received an additional $50,000 from
EcoAction that has extended the project to September 31st, 2002.
In anticipation of current funding ending, a proposal to the Ontario Trillium Foundation has
been submitted for the requested funds of $125,000 over five years, from October 1st, 2002 to
September 31st, 2007. This application, to meet Trillium criteria, has been submitted by
PESCA (Pickering East Shore Community Centre Association); a local community group within
the Frenchman's Bay watershed. Included in this submission were letters of support from each
of the project partners that will be contributing (in -kind and cash) to the project over the
five -year term.
Past activities of the Frenchman's Bay Watershed Rehabilitation Project have included the
successful completion of 24 education and outreach programs (workshops, seminars), 25
community action events (plantings, garbage clean -ups), 12 monitoring programs, 34 wildlife
habitat improvement projects (a total of 250 individual structures installed) resulting in at least 6
hectares of wetland, forest and meadow habitat enhanced.
522
The programs that have been suggested for implementation in the Trillium proposal (including
Hands -on- the - Earth - Program, Volunteer Environmental Watch and the Natural Alternative) will
continue to educate the community and raise awareness, provide individuals with the
experience and knowledge that will allow people to tackle environmental challenges on their
own and improve the quality of fish and wildlife habitat in the Frenchman's Bay watershed.
The Authority's roles and responsibilities are clearly defined within the collaborative agreement,
which include
• Hire, train, provide supervision and WHIMIS/ First Aid/ CPR training for the Frenchman's
Bay Watershed Rehabilitation Project Coordinator;
• Provide, in conjunction with Partners, office space and necessary equipment for the Project
Coordinator;
• Keep separate and detailed accounts of all expenditures for audit by the Partners and /or
the Ontario Trillium Foundation as required;
• Submit quarterly invoices and accounting as necessary to meet the requirements of the
Trillium Corporation;
• Provide interim and annual reports to the PESCA Executive;
• Advise PESCA within 15 days of any issues relating to changes of staff;
• Subject to the availability of funding, undertake the work program as described in Schedule
1;
• Obtain any and all approvals /permits and points of access to any land (private or public);
• Participate in the Frenchman's Bay Watershed Rehabilitation Project and Planning Advisory
Committee.
This report has been reviewed by the Director - Finance and Business Development Division
and concurs with the recommendation.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The proposal by PESCA to the Ontario Trillium Foundation has requested funding of $125,000
over five years - October 1, 2002 to September 31, 2007. Funds contributed to the project by
partners will be deposited into account numbers 225 -92 and 225 -93. Funds for the project will
be administered by the Authority. The Authority expects to receive other funding for the project
through the Conservation Foundation, TD Friends of the Environment Foundation and OMNR
CFWIP Program..
Report prepared by: Angela Porteous, 905 - 420 -4660 ext. 2212
Date: August 23, 2002
523
SECTION H - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES.#B112/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Jim McMaster
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.1 - 8.1.25 and 8.1.37 - Cougs Investments Ltd., with the exception of 8.1.11 -
Waterford Development Inc.), which are listed below.
RES. #8113/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
8.1.11 - Waterford Development Inc.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
CARRIED
THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application
8.1.11 - Waterford Development Inc., which Is listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.1 1281216 ONTARIO INC. (C /O INTRACORP DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED)
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Part Lot 15, Concession 7 NDS Part 1 Plan 43R -3057, (3011 Countryside Drive), in
the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned
by 1281216 Ontario Inc.
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regulatory Flood
Plan to accommodate modifications of the existing Castlemore Golf and Country Club.
524
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Grading, Drainage, & Planting Plans, drawing No. CA -1, prepared by MBTW Group,
dated June 2001, revised August 12, 2002.
• Sanitary Forcemain, drawing No. P.1, prepared by Candevcon Ltd., dated April 12,
2002, revised July 30, 2002.
• Silt Fence Detail, TRCA Sediment and Erosion Control Guidelines.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regulatory Flood
Plan to accommodate modifications of the existing Castlemore Golf and Country Club. The
proposal involves regrading of a portion of the valley slope and floodplain area to facilitate the
reconstruction of two greens, three tee locations, and an existing cart path which transcends
the valley wall. A directional drill crossing of the Humber River is also required to
accommodate a sanitary force main that will connect a new Clubhouse proposal to an existing
sanitary line located on the tableland on the opposite side of the valley.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed grading has been balanced to ensure there will be no impacts to flood storage
and conveyance during flood events.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be located between the proposed works and the
watercourse to prevent construction generated sediment from entering the watercourse. All
material storage and equipment refueling will be setback at least 30 metres from the
watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The impacts of the proposed works on the surrounding significant resource features will be
minimal and disturbed areas will be restored with acceptable landscape species. The
proposed depth of the directional bore crossing exceeds the minimal depth of 1.5 metres. The
new tees and greens are located outside of the 100 -year erosion limit of the watercourse and
the grading of the valley slope will not negatively affect slope stability. There are no fisheries
issues related to these works.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, and Section 4.2.2 H) -
Development and Redevelopment/Intensification within Established Communities /Highly
Urbanized Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32418
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: July 12, 2001
525
Application #: 223/01/BRAM
CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
8.1.2 CITY OF MISSISSUAGA
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 1, 2, Concession 1, (2000 Burnhamthorpe
Road East), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on
the property owned by City of Mississauga.
The purpose is to construct an 81.6 square metre comfort station within the floodplain of the
Etobicoke Creek within Fleetwood Park located at 2000 Burnhamthorpe Road East,
Mississauga.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Layout Plan for Fleetwood Park Comfort Station, drawing no. A01, prepared by
Peter Hossack Architect Inc., dated April 2002.
• Site Grading Plan for Fleetwood Park Comfort Station, drawing no. A02, prepared by
Peter Hossack Architect Inc., dated April 2002. Redline revised by TRCA, August 15,
2002, to extend the slit fencing to be Installed and maintained during construction.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To construct an 81.6 square metre comfort station within a floodplain of the Etobicoke Creek
within Fleetwood Park, located at 2000 Burnhamthorpe Road East, Mississauga. There is little
opportunity to locate the comfort station outside of a floodprone area as the entire park is
located within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
Control of Floodina:
The comfort station will be floodproofed above the minimum 100 year floodplain elevation for
ancillary structures within a resource -based use. There is no risk to loss of life or substantial
property damage given the size and purpose of this structure.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be established for the duration of construction to prevent sedimentation of the
nearby watercourses. All excess fill will be removed from the site and all areas of disturbance
will be restored with appropriate vegetation following construction.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed structure is located within an area of Fleetwood Park that is used for active
recreational purposes. The comfort station is immediately adjacent to an existing parking lot
and a baseball diamond and will not affect any significant natural features. There are no
geotechnical or fisheries related issues associated with this proposal.
526
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.2 (B)- New Resource -based Uses - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33386
Report Prepared by: Maria Flores, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: July 25, 2002
Application #: 301 /02 /MISS
8.1.3 STEVEN PERGER
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lots 324, 325, 326,
327, 328, 329, Plan TOR -4, (38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48 York Street), in the City of
Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Frank
Salvino/Tony Chiavaroli /Ralph Iacono /Rosanna Di Toro /Robert Di Toro /Bezris
Dunkley.
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area and within the Regional
Storm Floodplain to facilitate the construction of six houses within a designated Two -Zone
Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2007 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, drawing No. A -1, prepared by MP Design & Associates Ltd., dated April
2002, redline revised by Steven Perger, August 26, 2002.
• Silt Fence Detail, TRCA Sediment and Erosion Control Guidelines.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area and within the Regional
Storm Floodplain to facilitate the construction of six houses. Prior to the construction of the six
houses, the applicant intends to demolish three existing dwellings on the subject lands which
are located on the south side of York Street, west of Beverly Street in the City of Mississauga.
The subject property is located within a TRCA approved Two -Zone, which permits new
development within flood -prone areas subject to the necessary flood protection measures.
The proposed structures will be elevated above the Regional Storm Elevation and certified to
withstand the associated flood velocities. This proposal has also been circulated to Authority
staff as a variance application for a reduction to the required minimum lot sizing. Authority staff
have requested a deferral of the variance pending the issuance of a permit for the works under
Ontario Regulation 158.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed structures will not significantly affect flood storage capacity or the conveyance of
flood waters. Therefore, this application will not affect the control of flooding.
527
Pollution:
The construction area will be isolated from the watercourse with sediment and erosion control
fencing to prohibit construction generated sediments from entering the watercourse. All
disturbed areas will be restored following construction with appropriate landscape materials.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 Development & Redevelopment/Intensification Within
Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas.
CFN: 33424
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: August 16, 2002
CITY OF PICKERING
Application #: 319/02 /MISS
8.1.4 CITY OF PICKERING
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 15, Concession 8 (Eighth Concession
Road), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property
owned by City of Pickering.
The purpose is to regrade and widen an existing roadway (Concession 8) within the Fill
Regulated Area in order to change the existing road profile and allow safe access to a
proposed residence..
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Eight Concession Road Improvements Drawing Nos. R1, P1, P2 Sheets 2,3,5 prepared
by The City of Pickering, revised as received on August 28th, 2002.
• Eight Concession Road Improvements Drawing Nos. Drawing Sheets 6 to 9 prepared
by The City of Pickering, received on June 19th, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking regarding changes to the planting scheme, prepared by City of
Pickering, as received on August 16th, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
528
Proposal:
The City of Pickering proposes to upgrade existing Concession Road 8 within the Fill
Regulated Area for the Duffins Creek. Currently Concession 8 is a gravel roadway that extends
into the steep valley side slope at a severe grade and dead ends at the base of the slope. This
grade makes the roadway dangerous for access and service vehicles, particularly in the winter
season. The angle of the road is to be changed through a cut and fill exercise creating a
gentler slope and safer conditions. The works are required to provide safe access to a new
residence which is being constructed on the tableland but is to be accessed through an
existing driveway within the valley. The proposed grading will result in the removal of some
vegetation within the new road right of way, however, a detailed planting plan is promoted by
the applicant to compensate for any vegetation loss.
Control of Flooding:
The works are not within the Regional Storm Floodplain and are setback sufficiently from the
Duffins Creek. As a result there will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the work site to the satisfaction of TRCA.
Further, rock check dams will be placed within the roadway ditches to reduce erosion impacts
and to provide some water attenuation.
Conservation of Land:
The lands are adjacent to the Cherry Downs Environmentally Significant Area. However the
extent of cutting is within the road right of way is limited to 3 metres on the south side of the
roadway. This area has some cedar cover which will be restored to the satisfaction of TRCA
staff.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor management Program.
CFN: 33317
Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 21, 2002
Application #: 243/02/PICK
8.1.5 PAUL WEPPLER
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 61, 62, Plan 283, (417 Woodgrange
Avenue), in the City of Pickering, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Paul Weppler.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River, in
order to facilitate the construction of a flagstone patio, one story and two storey house
additions, and garage addition to the north, east and west sides of an existing two storey single
family dwelling.
529
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Letter of Intent to Remove Excess Fill Material From Site, Sedimentation Barrier
Details, prepared by Saccoccio Weppler Architects Inc., dated August 1, 2002,
received August 2, 2002.
• Site Plan, prepared by Saccoccio Weppler Architects Inc., dated May, 2002, received
August 2, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River, in
order to facilitate the construction of a flagstone patio, one storey and two storey house
additions, and garage addition to the north, east and west sides of an existing two story single
family dwelling. All of the proposed additions are located on tableland, away from the rear of
the house and top of bank.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm floodplain associated with the
Rouge River. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on tableland, more than 140 meters (460 feet) from
the watercourse. Sediment fencing will be erected and maintained until restoration of the site
is complete.
Conservation of Land:
The existing home is constructed at the top of bank. The proposed additions will be located on
flat tableland away from the top of bank, and is consistent with existing development in the
corridor reach. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the proposed
works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (C) - Minor Additions, and Section 4.2.2 (E) -
Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program.
CFN: 33412
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 13, 2002
530
Application #: 314/02/PICK
CITY OF TORONTO (EAST YORK COMMUNITY)
8.1.6 ANNA MOUNOUCHOS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 9, Plan RP3434, (19 Parkview Hill
Crescent), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Anna Mounouchos.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a new in- ground swimming pool and associated landscaping
works at the rear of an existing single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan 1, East and West Elevations, North and South Elevations, Site Plan 2,
prepared by Betz Pools, dated July 19, 2002, received July 19, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of an in- ground pool and associated landscaping, at the rear of an
existing single family dwelling.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain Area associated with
the Don River. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located a minimum of 150 meters (492 feet) from the Don River.
Sediment fencing will be established and maintained until restoration of the site is complete.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are to be undertaken a minimum of 4 meters (13 feet) from the top of
bank area, and is consistent with existing uses along the corridor reach. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical concerns associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 33264
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 31, 2002
531
Application #: 217/02/TOR
8.1.7 CITYSCAPE HOLDINGS INC.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lots 2 to 12, Plan
108, (55 Mill Street), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Cityscape Holdings Inc..
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Fill Regulated and Floodplain area of the
Lower Don Special Policy Area, in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary, 200 car
parking lot located at the south side of an existing historic distillery site.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Servicing Plan, prepared by Totten, Sims, Hubricki, dated April, 2002, received
August 16, 2002.
• Site Grading Plan, prepared by Totten, Sims, Hubricki, dated May, 2002, received
August 16, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated and Floodplain area of the
Lower Don Special Policy Area, in order to facilitate the construction of a temporary, 200 car
parking lot located at the south side of the Gooderham and Worts Historic Distillery Site. The
site is currently a vacant gravel lot located between CNR lines and the existing factory.
Control of Flooding:
Minimal changes to grade will be required in order to direct overland flow to appropriate
drainage catch - basins. This minor grading will not affect the control and storage of
floodwaters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located a distance of 363 meters (1190 feet) from the Lake Ontario
Waterfront. The Gardiner Expressway, CNR rail lines and a neighboring factory are located
between the proposed works and the waterfront. The proponent has included Stormseptors in
the proposed stormwater design plans. Staff have reviewed these plans and find them
acceptable.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on lands which have been historically altered in the
development and usage of the property. The proposed parking lot area is currently an
un- vegetated, empty lot. There are no significant natural features on site, and no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
532
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1. (B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone /Special Policy Areas - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33429
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 20, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
Application #: 322/02/TOR
8.1.8 SURINDER BASI
To place fill within a regulated area on (85 Bankview Circle), in the City of Toronto
(Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Surinder Basi.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in
order to facilitate the removal of an existing deck at the rear of an existing single family
dwelling, to allow for the construction of a one storey sunroom addition with foundation on the
same footprint.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Basement, First Floor, Elevations, Section Detail, prepared by Sunny
Additions Inc., dated June 2, 2002, received July 22, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in
order to facilitate the removal of an existing deck at the rear of an existing single family
dwelling, to allow for the construction of a one storey sunroom addition with foundation on the
same footprint.
Control of Flooding:
excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in order to facilitate the
removal of an existing deck at the rear of an existing single family dwelling, to allow for the
construction of a one storey sunroom addition with foundation on the same footprint Site Plan,
Basement, First Floor, Elevations, Section Detail, prepared by Sunny Additions Inc., dated
June 2, 2002, received July 22, 2002. The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill
Regulated Area associated with the Humber River, in order to facilitate the removal of an
existing deck at the rear of an existing single family dwelling, to allow for the construction of a
one storey sunroom addition with foundation on the same footprint. The proposed works are
not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the Humber River. The
storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
533
Pollution:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on tableland more than 8 meters (27 feet) from the
top of bank, and 45 meters (150 feet) from the watercourse. Landscaping, and a manicured
lawn are located between the proposed works and the top of bank. All excavated fill material
will be removed from the site. No sedimentation of the watercourse will occur as a result of the
proposed works.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on land which is currently covered with an existing
deck. There will be minimal additional land used in the construction of the proposed works.
All works are proposed to be undertaken on tableland more than 8 meters (27 feet) from the
top of bank, and 45 meters (150 feet) from the watercourse. There are no significant resource
features on site, and no slope stability /geotechnical concerns associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 33428
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 21, 2002
Application #: 327/02/TOR
8.1.9 J. POUNDER AND J. SPROAT
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 5, FIRST RANGE (160 Humbervale
Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber
River Watershed as located on the property owned by J. Pounder and J. Sproat.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek, in
order to facilitate the removal of an existing 58 square meter (192 square foot) sunroom on
piers, and the construction of a new 105 square meter (345 square foot) sunroom with a
foundation in its place.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• RED -LINE REVISED Site Plan, Sections and Notes, Floor Plans and Elevations,
Existing Floor Plans, prepared by Renaud Webber Designs, dated May 15, 2002,
received July 15, 2002
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
534
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Mimico Creek, in
order to facilitate the removal of an existing 58 square meter (192 square foot) sunroom on
piers, and the construction of a new 105 square meter (345 square foot) sunroom with a
foundation in the same place.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain Area associated with
the Mimico Creek. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located a minimum of 22 meters (75 feet) from the Mimico Creek.
Sediment fencing will be established and maintained on site until restoration of the site is
complete.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on land previously altered in the construction of the
previous sunroom, and is consistent with existing uses along the corridor reach. The works will
maintain a minimum set -back of 2 meters (6.5 feet) from the top of bank area. There are no
slope stability /geotechnical concerns associated with this project
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33375
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 16, 2002
Application #: 287/02/TOR
8.1.10 MARKLAND WOOD COUNTRY CLUB
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 6, Concession 5 (3090 Southcreek
Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Etobicoke Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by Markland Wood Country Club.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek, in
order to facilitate the grading and associated landscaping required for the improvement of two
golf tees.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Construction Details, prepared by Schollen and Company, dated August 1, 2002,
received August 2, 2002.
• 5 and 7 Tee Deck Grading Plans, prepared by Robert Heaslip and Associates Limited,
dated July 29, 2002, received August 2, 2002.
• 5 and 7 Tee Deck Cross - Sectional Drawings, prepared by Robert Heaslip and
Associates Limited, received August 2, 2002
535
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate fill from the existing 5 and 7 tee decks, and relocate to existing
lower decks in an effort to increase the lower deck sizes. There will be no importation of fill
from off -site. Minor landscaping works will be undertaken once fill relocation is complete. All
work will occur outside of the floodplain, and will incorporate restoration plantings.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. No fill material will
be brought from off site. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be established and maintained throughout the construction and
restoration process in accordance with details provided by the applicant and accepted by
TRCA staff. Sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located entirely within the manicured golf course lands. These lands
have been historically filled and altered in the development process. No significant resource
features will be affected by this proposal and there are no slope stability /geotechnical concerns
associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (H) - Existing Resource Based Uses - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33410
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 13, 2002
Application #: 313/02/TOR
8.1.11 WATERFORD DEVELOPMENT INC.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 25, 26, 27,
Plan 1176 YORK, (2101 - 2083 Lake Shore Boulevard West), in the City of Toronto
(Etobicoke Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed as located on the
property owned by Waterford Development Inc..
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a partially Fill Regulated Area of the Lake
Ontario Waterfront, in order to facilitate the demolition of an existing multi -unit motel complex,
and the construction of one 17 storey, 116 unit residential building, one 10 storey, 50 unit
residential building, and one 15 storey, 101 unit residential building, to be constructed a
minimum of 124 meters (406 feet) from the Lake Ontario Waterfront.
536
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2007 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Servicing, Grading and Stormwater Management Plan, prepared by A.J. Underhill
Associates Ltd., dated August 2001, received August 16, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated and Floodplain Area of the
Lake Ontario Waterfront, in order to facilitate the demolition of an existing motel complex, and
the construction of a 17 storey multi -unit residential building, a 10 storey multi -unit residential
building, and a 15 storey residential multi -unit building. This proposal is consistent with a site
plan application previously reviewed and approved by staff as part of the Humber Bay Shores
(Etobicoke Motel Strip) development.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is located outside of the floodplain and wave uprush area of Lake Ontario.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located more than 124 meters (406 feet) from the Lake Ontario
waterfront. A road, open vegetated park space and a beach separate the proposed
development and the water. No sedimentation is expected.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property has been previously altered due to the past use of the site as a motel
complex. There are no significant resource features on site, and no slope stability /geotechnical
issues associated with the proposed works. The grading of the lot conforms to the overall
grading plan for the Humber Bay Shores area, and staff have previously reviewed and
approved stormwater management plans for this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (A) - New Multi -lot and /or Large Lot
Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33432
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 21, 2002
537
Application #: 323/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO (MIDTOWN COMMUNITY)
8.1.12 ROITMAN HARRY
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Plan 5982, (9 York Valley Crescent), in
the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Roitman Harry.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the demolition of an existing single family dwelling, and the construction of a new
two storey single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Basement, First Floor and Second Floor Plans, Roof Plan, Front, Rear, Left
and Right Side Elevations, prepared by Delta Design, dated June 2002, received
August 14, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the demolition of an existing single family dwelling, and the construction of a new
two storey single family dwelling. The works are located on valley -bottom land, more than 20
meters (65 feet) from the Regional Storm Floodplain. The works are to be undertaken in the
established Hogg's Hollow community, on an existing lot of record. Site Plan approval has
been granted for this property by the City of Toronto.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Don River. The conveyance and storage of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on flat, manicured property, more than 150 meters
(492 feet) from the Don River. Sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on flat valley -bottom land, and are consistent with existing
uses in the corridor reach. No natural landforms will be affected or changed during the
construction of the proposed works. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues
associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.(D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
538
CFN: 33419
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 15, 2002
Application #: 316/02/TOR
8.1.13 ROSEDALE GOLF COURSE
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 8, Plan
1720, in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Rosedale Golf Course.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm
Floodplain of the Don River, in order to facilitate the connection of a private sanitary sewer from
the Rosedale Golf Club, to an existing City of Toronto sanitary sewer.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Sanitary Sewer Connection Servicing Plan, prepared by R.V. Anderson Associates.
Ltd., dated March 2002, received August 9, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm
Floodplain of the Don River, in order to facilitate the disconnection of a private septic system
(owned by Rosedale Golf Club), and connection to an existing City of Toronto sanitary sewer.
The proposed sanitary connection replaces an existing sanitary service and leaching bed
system which is approaching its expected service life.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no importation of fill material, and no changes to grade. The storage and
conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located on flat floodplain and will not cross the watercourse. There
will be no interference with the top of bank. The works will be conducted and restored in the
same day.
Conservation of Land:
There are no significant resource features on site. A geotechnical report has been provided
which supports the proposed plans.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Existing Resource -Based Uses - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
539
CFN: 33408
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 12, 2002
Application #: 311/02/TOR
8.1.14 VALERY TIMOFEEV
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10, Plan M -809, (28 Glenorchy Road), in
the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Valery Timofeev.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a walk -out basement with patio and associated landscaping
works, at the rear of a recently constructed single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• RED -LINE REVISED Site Plan, Basement, First Floor, Second Floor Plans South and
North Side Elevations, Front, Side, Back Elevations, Roof Plan, Building Section A -A
and Wall Details, prepared by D. Walden, dated February 16, 2002, received August
21, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order to
facilitate the construction of a walk -out basement with patio and associated landscaping works,
at the rear of a recently constructed single family dwelling.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located more than 60 meters (197 feet) outside of the Regional Storm
Floodplain associated with the Don River. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not
be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located on tableland, more than 90 meters (296 feet) from the Don
River. The proposed works will take place a minimum of 4 meters (13 feet) from the top of bank
area. The land between the works and the river are well- vegetated. Sediment fencing will be
installed and maintained throughout the construction process. Sedimentation of the
watercourse will not occur.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on flat tableland. No natural landforms will be affected or
changed during the proposed works. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues
associated with this project.
540
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and
Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33195
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 13, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 184/02/TOR
8.1.15 CLAUDIO GORIZZAN
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Plan M -1724, (38 Ballyconnor Court), in
the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Claudio Gorizzan.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a new single family dwelling a distance of 20 meters (65 feet)
from the top of bank area.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Lot 8 House Siting and Grading Plan, prepared by Condeland Engineering Ltd., dated
January 2002, received July 31, 2002, Schedule F Grading Sections, Schedule E
Grading Sections, prepared by Condeland Engineering Ltd., dated November 1997,
received July 31, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a new single family dwelling a distance of 20 meters (65 feet)
from the top of bank area. This development is consistent with approvals granted through the
planning process.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located a distance of 25 meters (82 feet) outside of the Regional
Storm Floodplain associated with the Don River. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters
will not be affected.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be established and maintained on site until restoration of the site is
complete. No sedimentation of the watercourse is expected as a result of the proposed works.
541
Conservation of Land:
The area of proposed works has previously been graded in the construction of the subdivision
and street. The proposed works will remove fill from the site and eliminate overland flows to
the valley system. There are no slope stability /geotechnical concerns associated with this
project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2. - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 33411
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 13, 2002
Application #: 312/02/TOR
8.1.16 DEREK NICHOLSON
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 317, 318, Plan 5112, (149 Three Valleys
Drive), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Derek Nicholson.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a new in- ground swimming pool and associated 46 square
meter (150 square foot) accessory building, at the rear of an existing single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Letter of Intent to Remove Excess Fill Material; Site Plan, prepared by the applicant,
dated August 12, 2002, received August 13, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of an in- ground pool and associated 46 square meter (150 square
foot) accessory building at the rear of an existing single family dwelling.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain Area associated with
the Don River. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located a minimum of 50 meters (164 feet) from the Don River.
Sediment fencing will be established and maintained on site until restoration of the site is
complete.
542
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on tableland a minimum of 4 meters (13 feet) from
the top of bank area, and is consistent with the existing use along the corridor reach. There are
no slope stability /geotechnical concerns associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 33355
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 10, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY)
Application #: 271/02/TOR
8.1.17 RICHARD GREEN
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 86, Plan M -1012, (55 South Marine Drive)
in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront
Watershed as located on the property owned by Richard Green.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Lake
Ontario Waterfront, in order to facilitate the construction of a new 29 square meter (96 square
foot) sunroom addition to the rear of an existing single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Basement and Foundation Plan, Roof Plan, Side and Back Elevations,
Construction Details, Sectional Drawings, prepared by Four Seasons Sunrooms,
received July 29, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Lake
Ontario Waterfront, in order to facilitate the construction of a new 29 square meter (96 square
foot) sunroom addition to the rear of an existing single family dwelling. The proposed new
addition will be located on flat tableland, more than 100 meters (328 feet) from the top of bank
area.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain or wave uprush area
of the Lake Ontario Waterfront. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be
affected.
543
Pollution:
The proposed works will occur on flat tableland, a minimum of 100 meters (328 feet) from the
top of bank area. Sedimentation as a result of construction will not occur.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will be undertaken on land previously altered in the construction of the
existing home, and will not extend more than 1.8 meters (6 feet), from the rear of the existing
dwelling. The City of Toronto Planning Dept. is satisfied that the proposed works is consistent
with existing zoning and permitted uses for the area. There are no slope stability /geotechnical
issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.(C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33398
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 31, 2002
Application #: 305/02/TOR
8.1.18 ROBERT ANTONUCCI
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 20, Plan M -657, (22 Hopecrest Crescent), in the
City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Robert Antonucci.
The purpose is to construct a 8.9 sq. m. (96 sq.ft.) garden shed within the Regional Storm
floodplain of the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan submitted by the applicant, date received August 14, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the erection of a 12 ft. by 8 ft. (96 sq. ft./8.9 sq. m.) garden shed on
concrete piers, within the floodfringe associated with Massey Creek. The garden shed is
currently located within the floodway portion of the floodplain and was erected without TRCA
approval and contrary to Authority policy. In order to rectify an ongoing violation, the owner, in
consultation with TRCA staff, has agreed to relocate the shed closer to his house and onto
higher ground, within the floodfringe.
544
Control of Flooding:
The structure will be located approximately 2 metres from the rear wall of the residence, slightly
within the Regional Storm floodplain associated with Massey Creek, but entirely outside the
hydraulic floodway. The proposed works are not expected to impact on the storage or
conveyance of flood water.
Pollution:
The proposed works are not expected to result in sedimentation of the watercourse as the
shed will be located approximately 40 metres from Massey Creek.
Conservation of Land:
The works are not expected to impact on any significant resource features and there are no
slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33218
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: May 21, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 195/02/TOR
8.1.19 ROSE AND PETER MONCADA
To place fill within a regulated area on (230 Fletcher Drive), in the City of Vaughan,
Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Rose and Peter
Moncada.
The purpose is to excavate fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground pool.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• In- ground pool for Rose Moncada drawn onto a survey prepared by Hunt Surveys Inc.
received by TRCA on August 20, 2002.
• Letter of undertaking prepared by Rose Moncada addressing excavated fill and
restoration dated August 19, 2002 and received by TRCA on August 20, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
545
Proposal:
The proposal is to remove fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground pool within the Fill
Regulated Area of the Don River. The proposed works are located on a lot in an approved plan
of subdivision adjacent to the Don River valley.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, therefore there will
be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are over 70 metres from the watercourse and are separated from a
watercourse by a grassed area and a stormwater management pond. In addition all excavated
fill will be removed from the site and the works will be immediately restored after construction is
complete. Therefore sedimentation of the watercourse is not expected.
Conservation of Land:
There are no significant environmental features or geotechnical issues associated with the site.
The proposed works are consistent with the corridor reach.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33427
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: August 20, 2002
Application #: 320 /02/VAUG
8.1.20 NIKITAS TZEMBELICOS
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 27, 28, Concession 2 Lot 2,
Plan 2397, (West of Bathurst Street, north of Teston Road), in the City of Vaughan,
Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Nikitas Tzembelicos.
The purpose is to alter a waterway and to conduct associated grading within a Regulated Area
of the Don River, to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall servicing Draft Plan of
Subdivision 19T- 92020, City of Vaughan.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2007 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing 4, Grading Plan, Drawing 5, Plan & Profile, Honey Locust Court; Drawing 6,
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan, all prepared by Anton Klkas Limited, Protect
435E -98, Dated received by TRCA August 22, 2002.
• Storm Outfall Rehabilitation Plan, Drawing L -2 of 2, prepared by Landscape Planning
Limited, Project 2001 -22, dated January 10, 2002, revised to August 8, 2002.
546
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a stormwater outfall and to conduct associated grading works
within a Regulated area of the Don River watershed to facilitate drainage from Draft Plan of
Subdivision 19T- 92020, City of Vaughan. The works involve the construction of a headwall
structure, plunge pool and outlet channel to the tributary watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
The outlet channel structure will be located within the Regional Storm floodplain, however, the
works will match existing grades and therefore, there will be no impacts to the control and
conveyance of flooding.
Pollution:
Detailed sediment control fencing will be installed to prevent sediment from entering the
watercourse during construction.
Conservation of Land:
No instream works will be required to facilitate this construction and TRCA engineering staff
have not identified any geotechnical or erosion issues. All disturbed areas will be reinstated
and planted with native species.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.3, Infrastructure & Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33321
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: June 24, 2002
Application #: 246 /02/VAUG
8.1.21 MARK RICE
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 18, Plan 65M -3141, (16 Creekwood
Court), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Mark Rice.
The purpose is to remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate
construction of an inground pool.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Proposed swimming pool plotted on survey prepared by Vladimir Krcmar Ltd.
received by TRCA on July 26, 2002.
• Fax prepared by Mark Rice addressing sediment removal and restoration received by
TRCA on August 16, 2002.
547
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to remove fill to facilitate the construction of an inground pool within the Fill
Regulated Area of the Humber River. The proposed works are located on a lot in an approved
plan of subdivision bordering on the Humber River valley.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore there will be
no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are 180 metres from the watercourse, and therefore no sedimentation of
the watercourse is expected from the works.
Conservation of Land:
No significant environmental features will be affected by the proposal, and the proposed works
are consistent with the corridor reach. There are no geotechnical concerns associated with the
proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33394
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Jason Scott, Jason Scott, extension
Date: July 30, 2002
Application #: 303 /02/VAUG
8.1.22 ROYBRIDGE HOLDINGS LIMITED
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 6, 7, 8,
Concession 9, (north of Highway 7, west of Highway 27), in the City of Vaughan,
Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Roybridge Holdings
Limited.
The purpose is to Alter a watercourse, place fill, and conduct associated site grading within a
Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate construction of a stormwater management
facility, storm outfall and associated infrastructure, and a pedestrian trail within the Rainbow
Creek Valley..
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
548
• Stormwater Management Facility, Drawing SWM -2 and SWM Facility Details, Drawing
SWM -3, Vaughan West North Business Park, prepared by Sernas Associates, Project
01228, dated January 2002, revised to August 21, 2002 (dated received by TRCA
August 23, 2002).
• SWM Facility Planting Plan, drawing P -1, prepared by PMA Landscape Architects,
Project 01070, dated November 2001, revised to August 15, 2002.
• Streetscape & Buffer Planting Plan, Drawings L -1, L -2 and L -3, prepared by PMA
Landscape Architects, Project 01070, dated November 2001, revised to August 15,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information.
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a stormwater management facility, a storm outfall and low flow
channel and a limestone screening trail within the valley corridor. The SWM facility will be
located on the tableland portion of the property which will outlet into the valley corridor via low
flow channel with dispersed flows into Rainbow Creek. No instream works will be required
during construction. The proposed pedestrian trail will traverse through existing disturbed
areas within the corridor and utilize an existing crossing which was previously a farm driveway.
The works are being undertaken to service industrial draft plan of subdivisions 19T -89058 and
19T- 99V07, City of Vaughan.
Control of Flooding:
The storm outlet and low flow channel will be constructed within the Regional Storm
Floodplain, however, there will be no change to existing grades and therefore, no impacts to
the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Detailed sediment and erosion controls will be implemented to prevent sedimentation of the
valley corridor and watercourse. Previous TRCA permit approvals have been granted for slope
stabilization works (Permit C- 02145, approved June 7th, 2002) within the valley corridor to
stabilize slopes associated with an old landfill within and adjacent to the valley corridor.
Conservation of Land:
No instream works are required as part of this proposal. Detailed landscaping and
rehabilitation plans have been prepared to significantly improve conditions within the valley
corridor. In addition, 5m tableland buffer plantings for all lots /blocks adjacent to the valley
corridor will be implemented using the appropriate native species. The proposal will result in a
marked improvement to existing conditions.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
549
CFN: 33406
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: August 7, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 309 /02/VAUG
8.1.23 GUSTAV BOEHRINGER
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 31, 32, 33, Plan 401, (17 Eckardt Street), in the
Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Gustav Boehringer.
The purpose is to construct a one - storey addition to an existing garage, to serve as a
workshop.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing No. 1 - Ground Floor Plan and Elevation to Back Yard, dated June 3, 2002.
• Drawing No. 2 - Side Elevation and Plan View, dated June 3, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a one - storey, 80- square foot workshop, as an addition to an
existing garage. The property is located entirely within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the
Rouge River and the Unionville Special Policy Area. The workshop will not be located in the
hydraulic floodway, and will in fact, be situated above the 350 -year storm flood elevation. The
workshop will not contain overnight living space.
Control of Flooding:
The property is located entirely within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River and
the Unionville Special Policy Area. The workshop will not be located in the hydraulic floodway,
and will in fact, be situated above the 350 -year storm flood elevation. No changes to the
existing grades on the property will result. Staff found the effect of the proposed works on the
storage and conveyance of Regional Storm flood waters to be negligible.
Pollution:
The proposed works will be situated more than 45 metres from the adjacent watercourse and
therefore the sedimentation of the watercourse is not expected to occur.
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope stability issues associated with the proposed works and no significant
natural heritage features will be affected. Any disturbed areas on site will be restored to their
original condition.
550
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements & Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33434
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: August 23, 2002
Application #: 330 /02 /MARK
8.1.24 CORPORATE COWBOYS INC.
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 27, Concession 6, (10997 Kennedy Road), in the
Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Corporate Cowboys Inc..
The purpose is to construct three cedar -post horse pens and a gravel pathway, in the Regional
Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River (Bruce Creek).
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• "Plan View ", received August 14.
• Schedule B, "Details of New Round Pens ", received August 14.
• Schedule D, "Details of Pathway", received August 14.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property currently consists a 40 -acre camp situated in a flat portion of the Rouge
River Valley traversed by the Bruce Creek. The area of the proposed works is approximately
30 metres from the watercourse and is characterized by flat, grassy pasture with a large barn.
The proposal is to construct three cedar -post horse pens adjacent to the existing barn,
between 60 and 86 feet in diametre, and an approximately 130 -foot long, 6 -foot wide gravel
pathway, leading from one side of the barn to the front of the barn.
Control of Flooding:
Two of the three proposed pens will be located partially within the Regional Storm Flood Plain
of the Rouge River and the gravel pathway will be located within the hydraulic floodway.
However, no changes to the existing grades of the site will take place and all excess fill will be
removed from site. Therefore no adverse effects to the storage or conveyance of flood waters
will result.
Pollution:
The proposed works will be situated approximately 30 metres from the watercourse, so that no
sedimentation of the watercourse will result.
551
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope stability issues associated with the proposal and no significant natural
heritage features will be affected by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33420
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: August 15, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 315 /02 /MARK
8.1.25 GALEN UDELL & TRACEY DELINE
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 8, Concession 1, Plan 240, (265 Lakeland
Crescent), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Galen Udell & Tracey Deline.
The purpose is to construct an addition to an existing deck within the Regional Storm Flood
Plain of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Deck Plan received by TRCA on July 30, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of constructing an addition to an existing deck within the Regional Storm
Flood Plain and Special Policy Area of the Lake Wilcox Area of Humber River. The property is
entirely within the Flood Plain and currently hosts a single family dwelling, deck and hot tub.
The deck will be placed on concrete slabs, and no therefore no grading or excavating is
required.
Control of Flooding:
No fill or excavation is required for the project. As the overall size of the deck is relatively
minor, the project will not aggravate flooding downstream.
Pollution:
As no excavation or filling is required, no pollution is expected. The proposed deck expansion
is over an area currently used as patio.
552
Conservation of Land:
There are no significant resource features or geotechnical issues on the site.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 (C) - Existing Special Policy Areas - and Section 4.2.2
(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33463
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: August 28, 2002
553
Application #: 336/02/RH
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES. #B114/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Jim McMaster
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.26 - 8.1.36, inclusive), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items, for
which all the required Information was received and finalized as listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.26 BELL CANADA
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Mayfield Road, in the City of
Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Bell
Canada.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the installation
of a Bell Canada conduit under the Etobicoke Creek by directional boring method.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004.
• Conduit Details- Section 1, Plan No. 401, prepared by Morrison Hershfield, dated June
27, 2002, received August 30, 2002.
• Conduit Details- Section 2, Plan No. 402, prepared by Morrison Hershfield, dated June
27, 2002, received August 30, 2002.
• Conduit Details- Section 3, Plan No. 403, prepared by Morrison Hershfield, dated June
27, 2002, received August 30, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking regarding restoration of disturbed areas to conditions, prepared
by Morrison Hershfield, dated August 28, 2002, received August 29, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the installation
of a Bell Canada conduit under two tributaries of the Etobicoke Creek by directional boring and
the installation of manholes in conjunction with municipal road work at Mayfield Road (east of
Hurontario Street), Brampton. Mayfield Road is planned to be widened to the south in this area
and the proposed conduit will ultimately be located under the future Mayfield right -of -way.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed conduit will be installed beneath the watercourse and there will be no impact on
the storage or conveyance of flood waters. In addition, no excavated material will be
stockpiled within the Regional Storm Floodplain. Therefore, there will be no impacts to flood
storage or conveyance as a result of these works.
554
Pollution:
Silt fencing will encircle the bore pits to impede the overland migration of construction
generated sediments. All vehicular re- fueling will be appropriately setback from the
watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The conduit will be installed through the use of directional boring at a minimum of 1.5 metres
beneath the watercourse. The proposed manholes are to be located on tableland, with the
exception of one manhole and one bore hole located just within the top of bank and set back
approximately 30 metres from the watercourse. There will be no significant impacts to natural
vegetation and all areas of disturbance will be restored to their original condition or stabilized
until the anticipated roadwidening commences. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related
concerns associated with this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33351
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: July 9, 2002
Application #: 269/02/BRAM
8.1.27 WANLESS LANDS INC.
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 14, Concession 1 WHS,
(North West of Hurontario Street and Sandalwood Parkway), in the City of
Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by
Wanless Lands Inc..
The purpose is to alter a waterway by retrofitting an existing on -line stormwater management
pond and an off -line stormwater management pond and their associated outfalls to provide
water quality and erosion control for existing and proposed development applications.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2007.
• Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Wanless Lands Inc., dated August 26, 2002,
received by TRCA August 26, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
555
Proposal:
The subject lands are located north of Sandlewood Parkway between Hurontario Street and
the CP Railway in the City of Brampton and are traversed by a tributary of the Etobicoke Creek.
The applicant is proposing to alter a waterway by retrofitting an existing on -line stormwater
management pond and its outlet (Caterpillar Pond) and retrofit an existing off-line stormwater
pond (Brampton Brick Pond) on the industrial lands south of Wanless Drive in order to provide
the necessary stormwater quality and quantity controls to service a new Draft Plan of
Subdivision on lands north of Wanless Drive.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works will not affect the existing Regulatory Flood Elevation or the conveyance
of flood flows. Therefore, there will be no impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures have been incorporated into this proposal to prohibit
construction generated sediments from entering the watercourse. All works will be required to
adhere to warm -water timing guidelines.
Conservation of Land:
There are no significant natural resource features that will be affected by this proposal, nor any
fisheries or geotechnical issues associated with the project. All disturbed areas will be restored
with acceptable woody and herbacious vegetation.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 3.3 - Policies & Procedures For Identifying
Watercourses and Alterations, and Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33350
Report Prepared by: Grace Conte, extension 5271
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: July 9, 2002
CITY OF PICKERING
Application #: 268 /02 /BRAM
8.1.28 CAROLYN AND BOB PARKE
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 15, Concession 7 (Concession Road
8), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property
owned by Carolyn and Bob Parke.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated area of the Duffins Creek, in
order to facilitate the construction of a new one storey single family dwelling and associated
septic system on a historical lot of record.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004.
556
• Topographic Site Plan, prepared by the applicant, received September 4, 2002, Full
Site Restoration Letter of Undertaking, prepared by the owner, dated August 29, 2002,
received September 4, 2002, Site Plan with verified Stable Top of Slope Line, prepared
by the applicant, dated August 4, 2002, received September 4, 2002, Siltation Fence
Details, prepared by the applicant, dated September 4, 2002, received September 4,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Duffins Creek, in
order to facilitate the construction of a new one storey single family dwelling and associated
septic system on a historical lot of record. The house will be located at the edge of the Cherry
Downs Environmentally Significant Area (ESA), and will be accessed via an existing roadway
through the ESA. There will be no removal of existing trees in the construction of this project.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Duffins Creek. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located a minimum of 140 meters (460 feet) from the Duffins Creek.
Sediment control fencing will be installed and maintained until the construction and restoration
of the site is complete.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed house and septic system are located a minimum of 20 meters (65 feet) from the
top of bank. Suitable restoration plans have been provided for all disturbed areas. A
geotechnical report which supports the proposed development has been provided.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.1. - New Development - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33284
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 10, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 223/02/PICK
8.1.29 ELIAS BOMBEN
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 23, Concession 1 Lot 17, Plan 65M -3106,
(107 Sierra Court), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Elias Bomben.
557
The purpose is to remove fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground pool within the Fill
Regulated Area of the Don River. The proposed works are located on a lot within an approved
plan of subdivision backing onto the Don River Valley.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004.
• Pool location submitted by Elias Bomben received by TRCA on August 2, 2002.
• Letter of undertaking dated September 4, 2002 submitted by Patty Bomben.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to remove fill to facilitate the construction of an in- ground pool within the Fill
Regulated Area of the Don River. the proposed works are within an approved plan of
subdivision backing onto the Don River valley.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no
impact on storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are 50 metres from the watercourse so no sedimentation of the
watercourse is expected.
Conservation of Land:
There are no significant resource features on the site and there are no geotechnical issues
related to the proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33407
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: August 8, 2002
Application #: 310 /02/VAUG
8.1.30 ASSUNTA MARIA DECUaI
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 33, Plan 65M -2604, (44 Modesto
Gardens), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Assunta Maria Decuzzi.
The purpose is to Construct a house within the Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River.
558
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004.
• Letter of undertaking prepared by Tony Decuzzi dated September 4, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information.
Proposal:
The proposal consists of re- grading and excavating to facilitate construction of a single family
dwelling entirely within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. the proposed structure will
be located within the valley corridor on an existing lot of record in an approved plan of
subdivision. The majority of the lot is located below the top of bank, and there are no
alternative building envelopes outside of the valley corridor on the lot. In addition, the lot backs
onto a natural area associated with the Humber River.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain and therefore there will be
no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be erected prior to construction and will remain until the works are
complete and the area has been sodded to prevent sedimentation of the natural feature
behind the lot.
Conservation of Land:
The subject lot was approved prior to the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
The subject lot is one of the last few vacant lots on the street, and there is no other viable
building envelope on the lot. All exposed areas will be re- vegetated upon completion of
construction and proposed landscaping will provide an additional buffer of the natural feature
at the rear of the lot. The proposed development will not impact on any natural resource
features. Geotechnical concerns have been addressed to the satisfaction of TRCA staff.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (G) - Infilling of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33395
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: July 30, 2002
TOWN OF AJAX
Application #: 302 /02/VAUG
8.1.31 TOWN OF AJAX
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area
(Duffins Creek Valley Highway 2 North to Rossland Road), in the Town of Ajax,
Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Ajax and the
TRCA.
559
The purpose is to construct a formal pedestrian walkway within the Fill Regulated Area and
partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Duffins Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004.
• Trail Layout and Bridge Details Drawing No. LP- 1 -LP5, Project No. 01 -1647 prepared
by Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects, as received on June 1, 2002.
• Duffins Creek Trail Valley Details Drawing Nos. DP1 -DP3, Project No. 01 -1647
prepared by Cosburn Giberson Landscape Architects, as received on June 1, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The Town of Ajax is proposing to construct a pedestrian walkway within the Duffins Creek
Valley from Kingston Road to Rossland Avenue. Currently there are several informal trails in the
valley and this proposed trail will create a singular route which will minimize impacts to existing
vegetation caused by the multiple informal routes. The trail will be located partially through an
Environmentally Significant Area however, the chosen route walked by TRCA staff is devoid of
vegetation cover as a result of the existing informal trail system in the valley. The trail will also
be routed along a section of Elizabeth Avenue to avoid portions of the ESA where there is
currently no public access. Three pedestrian bridge crossing are also proposed. These
bridges have been carefully located in the field to avoid impacts to existing vegetation. The
proposed trail will implerhent a critical component of Ajax's Trail Master Plan.
Control of Flooding:
The trail will be located at grade and in most instances is beyond 10 metres from the low flow
channel of the Duffins Creek. The trail is located beyond the hydraulic floodway. The bridges
have been designed to withstand velocities associated with more frequent storm events and
unhinge in a Regional Storm event, to not restrict flood flows. The footings have been
sufficiently setback to avoid impacts to the river banks. As a result there will be no impact on
the control of flooding.
Pollution:
In light of the need to protect the existing vegetation, staff will not require that sediment fencing
be erected along the proposed trail route. Rather, construction will be undertaken with small
equipment to minimize the footprint of disturbance. All disturbed areas will be restored in
accordance with restoration plans provided by the applicant. The works will not affect the
control of pollution.
Conservation of Land:
The trail is being routed along an existing informal trail route to minimize impacts to existing
vegetation. In addition the single trail will help concentrate pedestrian traffic and deter the use
of several informal trails which are proposed to be restored, resulting in improved conditions
within the valley corridor.
560
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.1.2, New Resource Based Uses of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32659
Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: November 9, 2001
TOWN OF CALEDON
Application #: 341 /01 /AJAX
8.1.32 TOWN OF CALEDON
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Glasgow Road), in
the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned
by The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct an addition
to an existing structure within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River to formalize
an existing parking area and accommodate a 100 square foot storage addition and walkway to
an existing tennis clubhouse within Edelweiss Park in the Town of Caledon.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004.
• Location Map /Site Plan, Edelweiss Park, Town of Caledon, Received by TRCA August
28, 2002.
• Site Plan - Tennis Club Parking Lot, Received by TRCA August 28, 2002.
• Site Plan - Addition to Tennis Clubhouse, Received by TRCA August 28, 2002,
redlined revised by TRCA September 3, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is owned by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and is
located south of Glasgow Road and west of Deer Valley Drive in Bolton. The subject lands
currently service the majority of the municipality's recreational needs with existing facilities and
clubhouse structures for soccer and tennis. The subject lands are located within the Regional
Floodplain of the Humber River which has restricted the ability for the Town to expand the
existing facilities to accommodate the growing needs of the Bolton community. Although,
Town staff are working with Authority staff to identify alternate locations to support Bolton's
long -term recreational needs, there is an urgent need for minimal expansion of the existing
facilities. This proposal involves the formalization of an existing grass parking area with a
gravel base at the existing grade and a 100 square foot addition and entry ramp to the existing
450 square foot clubhouse facility. The clubhouse expansion cannot be floodproofed to the
Regional Storm elevation as the door opening is determined by the finished floor elevation of
the existing clubhouse, however all wiring and electrical components will be flood - proofed.
561
Control of Flooding:
Impacts to flood storage or the conveyance of storm flows should be minimal as the proposed
developments will be located outside of the hydraulic floodway and the 100 -year Flood Plain.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed around all disturbed areas to prevent
construction generated sediments from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no significant natural features to be affected by the proposed works and all disturbed
areas will be stabilized and revegetated with appropriate species following construction. There
are no geotechnical or fisheries concerns related to this project.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent section 4.2.2 - Development & Redevelopment/Intensification Within
Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33457
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: August 27, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 333/02/CAL
8.1.33 ANGELICO INVESTMENTS INC.
To place fill within a regulated area on Block A, C, Plan 4556, (8551, 8555, 8561 &
8601 Woodbine Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Angelico Investments Inc.
The purpose is to construct a new commercial building at the flood fringe of the Regional
Storm Floodplain.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004.
• MichaelAngelico MarketPlace Commercial Development Site Plan Drawing A1-0
Project No. 20077 as received on September 3rd, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
562
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to construct a new commercial development consisting of three
buildings on the subject property in a phased development scheme. The site has been
designated for the proposed expansion by the Town of Markham. Phase 1 was approved at the
Executive Committee Meeting of July 26th, 2002 and at this time the applicant is seeking
approval for Phase 2, the final phase; the construction of a new commercial building at the
flood fringe of the Regional Storm Floodplain. The location of the building is not Fill Regulated
and is currently utilized as a parking lot. The site is removed from the watercourse which is
channelized at the opposite corner of the intersection. During a Regional Storm Event it is
expected that water would spill over the intersection onto the site resulting in some passive
storage of flood waters. This development is consistent with existing development within the
flood fringe of the Regional Storm Floodplain at this intersection including the existing Hyundai
Plant and the Woodbine and 7 Commercial Center. The new commercial building will be flood
proofed to the Regional Storm elevation.
Control of Flooding.
Studies conducted by the applicant and assessed by TRCA engineering staff have confirmed
that the works will have no measurable effect on the control of flooding given that the applicant
is creating additional flood storage lost by the footprint of the proposed building. The site
would be subject to flooding at extreme storm events beyond the 100 year storm. The
proposed structure will be floodproofed to the Regional Storm elevation.
There are roadside ditches to be retained to help in the conveyance of floodflows. The Town of
Markham and the Region of York are in discussions with the applicant about the upgrading of
the ditches as this intersection. In the event that the ditches are removed a new proposal for
flood conveyance and flood storage would be required and would be processed as a revision
to this permit. This proposal will involve regrading on municipal lands at the south west corner
to create additional flood storage.
Pollution:
The work are not adjacent to the watercourse which flows at the opposite corner of the
intersection and is within two culvert crossings of Highway 7 and Woodbine Avenue.
Temporary fencing will be erected at the perimeter of the site during construction.
Conservation of Land:
There is an existing building and associated parking facility on the subject lands which will be
removed to accommodate the proposed development. There are no natural features on the
subject lands.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are consistent with Section 4.2 - Redevelopment within Highly Urbanized Areas, of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33461
Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: August 28, 2002
563
Application #: 335 /02 /MARK
8.1.34 TOWN OF MARKHAM
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Block D, Plan 6999, (along Milne Creek, south of Highway 7, between McCowan
and Markham Roads from Bakerdale Road southward Drakefield Road), in the
Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (to create new creek bed, to install erosion control
works) in a Fill Regulated Area; to construct structures (armourstone wall, vortex weirs,
bioengineering works) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; and to alter a watercourse (Milne
Creek) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through a dam and pump
around method in order to work in the dry and through modifying the centre line of the creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004.
• Drawings L1- Grading Plan; L2- Grading Plan; L3- Planting Plan; L4- Planting Plan;
L5- Details; Project 99 -55, Milne Creek Restoration; all dated July 25, 2002; all
received July 26, 2002; prepared by Harrington Hoyle Ltd.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering and restoration plans);
dated September 3, 2002; received September 3, 2002; prepared by the Town of
Markham.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the restoration and erosion control works along a 340 metre section of
Milne Creek from Bakerdale Road southward to Drakefield Road, which is known as the
"primary creek restoration area ". This proposal is a Town of Markham initiative and works
will be completed by the Town. The proposal was reviewed by TRCA staff during the
Environmental Assessment process which involved the "upper" and "lower reaches" as well as
this "primary creek restoration area ". The works will be conducted on lands owned by TRCA.
The works are required to address on -going problems associated with erosion and flooding.
Along this section of Milne Creek there is down cutting of the stream bed and associated bank
slumping as well as the failing of existing erosion protection. Restoration will incorporate
modifications to the channel to control erosion, dissipate the energy and create habitat with
pools and riffles.
Control of Flooding:
Through a Letter of Undertaking the Town of Markham will be supplying the hydraulic
information to assess the implications of the proposed structures and channel modifications on
the Regional Storm Floodplain.
564
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (coffer dams, silt fences, dam and pump around, splash
pads, ) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter
the watercourse. In water works will be conducted in the dry through a dam and pump
around method. Two wetland cells will be created at two storm water outfalls. The purpose of
the wetlands will be to slow and cleanse the street runoff before entering the creek.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project. The centre line and existing grade of
the channel will be modified and the creek will also be altered temporarily to allow works to be
conducted in the dry. The purpose of the channel modifications is to dissipate energy,
thereby controlling erosion and also to provide for fish habitat with the pools and riffles. Bank
stabilization will also be achieved through the use of bioengineering (live fascines, brush
mattresses, brush layers, live crib walls) as well as through seeding and plantings. The in
stream works will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish
habitat and will require an authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO).
The Town has submitted a Letter of Intent which indicates that the HADD will be compensated
in the following manner: by constructing a plunge pool with an armourstone wall to dissipate
water flow and to prevent further erosion; by creating a new bankfull channel; by replacing 3
existing weirs with a river -stone lined channel and eleven vortex weirs to assist in dissipating
water flow and to facilitate fish movement; by creating two wetlands at the storm outfalls which
will slow and cleanse street runoff before it enters the creek; by stabilizing the banks with
bioengineering techniques; and by planting in the riparian zone to provide shade. When the
DFO authorization has been received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill,
Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit. The proposed works will impact no significant
terrestrial resource feature. The works will be conducted on lands owned by the TRCA,
however, TRCA's Archaeologist confirmed that the works will be conducted on lands previously
disturbed and therefore will not require any further archaeological investigations. The works will
require a Letter of Entry from the Property Section prior to conducting works on TRCA lands.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 3.3 B)- "Policies and Procedures for Identifying
Watercourses and Alterations" of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
CFN: 33057
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: August 27, 2002
Application #: 127/02 /MARK
8.1.35 TOWN OF MARKHAM
To alter a waterway on Lot 21, Concession 5, (3990 Major MacKenzie Drive East), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Town of Markham.
565
The purpose is to create a stormwater management pond and outfall channel, from the pond
to a tributary of the Rouge River, in order to service the Angus Glen Community Centre and
Library.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004.
• SS1 - Site Servicing Plan - prepared by Shore Tilbe Irwin & Partners, date received
August 29, 2002.
• SG1 - Site Grading Plan - prepared by Sore Tilbe Irwin & Partners, date received
August 29, 2002.
• L -1 - Site Preparation Plan - prepared by Schollen & Company Inc., date received
August 29, 2002.
• L -2 - Restoration /Planting Plan - prepared by Schollen & Company Inc., date received
August 29, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking from P.S. Magowan of Marshall Macklin Monoghan Limited, for
meeting TRCA requirements regarding sediment and erosion control, construction
timing and landscaping (as outlined in correspondence from TRCA, dated August 26,
2002 and September 3, 2002) - date received September 4, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed,by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a stormwater management pond and outfall channel to a tributary
of the Rouge River (Bruce Creek), in order to service the new Angus Glen Community Centre
and Library. The site plan for the Community Centre and Library was reviewed and accepted
by TRCA staff in April 2002.
Control of Flooding:
Only the proposed outfall channel will be situated within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The
design of the proposed pond and outfall channel, and proposed grading associated with the
project, will not result in negative impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be in place for the duration of construction, in
order to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse. As there will be no instream works
associated with the project, staff determined that an authorization from the Department of
Fisheries and Oceans was not required. The applicant will be provided with a Letter of Advice
upon permit issuance, which will outline mitigative measures for protecting fish habitat. All
works along the banks of the watercourse will take place within the cold water timing window,
June 15 to September 15.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical issues associated with the project and no significant natural heritage
features will be affected. Sediment and erosion control measures will be in place for the
duration of construction. Following completion of construction, the site will be restored with
native plantings to the satisfaction of Authority staff.
566
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33274
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: June 6, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 222 /02 /MARK
8.1.36 AUTUMN GROVE BUILDERS LTD.
To alter a waterway on Part Lot 58, Concession 1 WYS, (Yonge Street at Tower Hill
Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Autumn Grove Builders Ltd.
The purpose is to construct a new road crossing on a tributary of the Rouge River to facilitate
the development of an approved plan of subdivision within the Town of Richmond Hill.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2007.
• Autumn Grove Builders Limited Storm Drainage Plan Drawing Nos 4, 5, 6, 11, 14, 16,
25, 28, 29, 34, 36 and 37, prepared by Rand Engineering revised as received on
August 22nd, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to construct a new road crossing on a tributary of the Rouge River as
part of the development of an approved plan of subdivision. The crossing is to occur within a
dry valley with no defined river channel. The valley does serve the function of conveying flood
flows during a Regional Storm event. The works consist of the placement of a large culvert and
the fill material within the 150 metre wide valley. The culvert is of sufficient size to convey the
Regional Storm without any upstream or downstream impacts. The culvert which will be dry for
most of the year will allow for wildlife movement through the corridor.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no impact on the control of flooding as the culvert has been designed to convey
the Regional Storm event without any upstream or downstream impacts.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be erected during construction in accordance with detailed plans
submitted by the applicant and accepted by Authority staff.
567
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored in accordance with detailed restoration plans provided to
the TRCA.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in accordance with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33389
Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5360
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: July 25, 2002
CITY OF AJAX
Application #: 298/02/RH
8.1.37 COUGS INVESTMENTS LTD.
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 3, Concession 4, in the
Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by
Cougs Investments Ltd..
The purpose is to construct three (3) pedestrian bridge crossings over a tributary of Carruthers
Creek to facilitate the construction of a 9 hole expansion to the existing Deer Creek Golf
Course, located west of Audley Road and north of the Hydro lands.
The permit will be issued for the period of September 6, 2002 to September 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by Cougs Investments Ltd., dated August 22, 2002,
date received September 3, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves an alteration to a waterway in order to facilitate the construction of three
(3) pedestrian bridge crossings over a small intermittent stream, being a tributary of Carruthers
Creek with an upstream drainage area of Tess than 125 hectares. The proposed bridges will
connect the new cart paths within the 9 hole Deer Creek Golf Course expansion site, located
west of Audley Road and north of the hydro lands. This site is not located within a Fill
Regulated Area, therefore the remaining site development involving site grading and pond
construction works, does not require a TRCA permit.
Control of Flooding:
Minimal filling is required adjacent to the bridge abutments to allow for the bridge approaches.
TRCA staff has reviewed the proposed works and are satisfied that any hydraulic changes
would have only minor local impacts.
568
Pollution:
Bridge abutments will be set back from the channel of the watercourse and protected with
siltation fencing.
Conservation of Land:
Due to the design of the bridges and the nature of the construction, no impact on fisheries
resources is expected. The proponent will be undertaking riparian plantings to the Authority
standards as part of the site restoration work.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(H) - Existing Resource -based Uses - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33357
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 10, 2002
Application #: 274 /02 /AJAX
RES. #B115/02 - PARTNERSHIP WITH DUCKS UNLIMITED CANADA
Engineering Services Duffins Creek Marsh. A contract with the
Engineering Services Section of Ducks Unlimited Canada to develop a
wetland restoration design including wetland management structures for
the Duffins Creek Marsh at a cost not to exceed $15,000, including GST.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Ron Moeser
THAT the Engineering Services Section of Ducks Unlimited Canada be contracted by the
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, to develop a wetland restoration design
including wetland management structures for the Duffins Creek Marsh at an upset
amount of $15,000, Including GST.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The loss of wetland habitat within Duffins Creek Marsh is apparent, in a quick comparison of
historical and recent air photography for the site. A combination of high water levels, flooding,
abundance of carp, poor water clarity, and the colonization of purple loosestrife have all
accounted for the substantial degradation of this valuable wetland complex. Staff are in the
process of finalizing an action plan for the restoration of the entire Duffins Marsh Area and the
development of a wetland restoration design is a valuable component of this plan.
569
The restoration of Duffins Creek Marsh will improve the biodiversity, habitat health, and
ecosystem function of the wetland and surrounding area. This work is timed with the
completion of the Watershed Strategy and the Duffins Creek Fish Plan. These two documents
recognize the important role of the marsh and identify specific management actions needed to
protect the it. Coastal estuary wetlands and their adjacent riparian areas are extremely
productive systems which support a great diversity of fish and wildlife habitats. Coastal
wetlands play a vital role in mitigating the erosive effects of lake and river fluctuations,
improving water quality, and providing excellent recreation and educational opportunities.
Coastal wetlands have steadily been lost and degrading within the GTA area, and the Duffins
Creek Marsh represents one of the single largest opportunities to make major improvements in
this significant type of Lake Ontario habitat.
DETAILS OF THE WORK TO BE DONE
Overall, our goal for the Duffins Creek Marsh area includes the restoration and expansion of
the wetland area. The diversification of the terrestrial upland communities, creation of critical
fish and wildlife habitat structures, and improving and managing public access. This contract
will help us develop and design the wetland restoration portion of the proposed work including:
• Isolate backwater lagoons from the detrimental conditions within the river;
• Potentially control or moderate water levels;
• Control carp access but provide passage of other fish species;
• Dramatically increase the extent and quality of emergent wetland vegetation.
To achieve these objectives Ducks Unlimited Canada will develop design options for the
restoration of wetland habitat within the marsh. These options will be developed based on
thorough investigations into soil conditions, seed bank viability, topographic survey terrestrial &
aquatic), hydraulic analysis, conceptual and detailed engineering drawings. Presentation of
the options will be made to TRCA staff for review and the preferred option will be advanced to
final design.
RATIONALE
Ducks Unlimited Canada is a conservation organization with more than 60 years experience in
wetland conservation, education and research. Their efforts not only provide a benefit to North
American waterfowl, but have also successfully targeted habitat for hundreds of wildlife
species, improved clean drinking water, enhanced flood protection and contributed to nation
wide recreational economic activity.
For the past 5 years TRCA has worked toward developing a partnership with Ducks Unlimited
Canada through a variety of education, project implementation and staff training programs.
More recently, Ducks Unlimited Canada provided their expertise at our Wetlands, Woodlands
and Wood Ducks Conservation Seminar; provided staff resources and display material for a
Stewardship Forum at the Kortright Centre for Conservation; assisted with the duck banding
program at Tommy Thompson Park; and provided extensive printed materials and posters for
our Stewardship Resource Centre.
570
The trademark of Ducks Unlimited is their record of wetland conservation and improvement
through the development and deployment of wetland restoration techniques within degraded
wetlands. Ducks Unlimited Canada Staff, will provide TRCA with a detailed set of management
options and directions on how to improve the wetland habitat at Duffins Creek Marsh. This is
an exceptional opportunity to utilize many years of hands -on experience related to wetland
creation techniques.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding is available in the Duffins Creek Wetland Restoration Account #230 -55.
For Information contact: Gord MacPherson, extension 5246
Date: August 16, 2002
RES. #B116/02 - DUFFINS CREEK FLOODLINE MAPPING UPDATE
Approval to retain Marshall Macklin Monaghan to complete a floodline
mapping update of 25 existing Duffins Creek floodline maps.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Ron Moeser
THAT the Authority enter into an agreement with Marshall Macklin Monaghan to complete
the floodline mapping update for 25 existing analogue sheets within the Duffins Creek
watershed at the cost of $21,213 + GST.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
One of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program ( VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and
mapped information for use by the Authority and others, and to incorporate improved
technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order
to continue to provide accurate floodplain management information, the Water Management
Division has prepared a Floodplain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific
requirements necessary to update the Authority's current Flood and Fill Line Regulation
Mapping. Priority watersheds identified within the Work Plan include the Duffins Creek given
the extent of previous, current and future development activities.
This project involves updating 25 existing Duffins Creek floodline maps, originally prepared in
the late 1970's. The proposed works consist of converting the existing hydraulic model from
Hec -2 to Hec -Ras, which is an updated version of the hydraulic software package currently
used by TRCA. The new software will improve modelling and data management capabilities
and permit TRCA staff to provide accurate, up -to -date floodplain information required for
regulation purposes.
571
RATIONALE
Three consultant groups, as listed below, were invited to submit proposals for the project
based upon the Terms of Reference for the work. An upset limit of $21,250 + GST was
established for the project.
• Aquafor Beech Limited $21,200
• MacViro Consultants Inc. $17,960
• Marshall Macklin Monaghan $21,213
* All prices exclude GST.
A committee of three TRCA staff has unanimously selected Marshall Macklin Monaghan for the
project. This selection was based upon the consultants' submission of a fee proposal for
consulting services which best satisfied the set of written selection criteria as developed by
TRCA in advance of the selection process. The criteria included the requirement to have
previous experience in the area of floodline mapping, and familiarity with state -of- the -art
approaches. The successful proposal offered the best approach to the work and represents
the best overall value. This proposal was choosen over the least expensive bid because of the
companies significant experience with the task at hand. Staff are confident that the chosen
consultants will conduct the required tasks in a timely and efficient manner.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds required to complete the project are available from the Region of Durham under the
account code 115 -85.
Report prepared by: Marilee Gadzovski, extension 5362
For Information contact: Marilee Gadzovski, extension 5362
Date: August 27, 2002
RES. #B117/02 - YORK PEEL DURHAM GROUNDWATER STUDY - CVC DRILL
PROGRAM
Transfer of additional funding to CVC for drill program as part of YPD
Groundwater study.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Ron Moeser
THAT the 2002 Budget Allocations within the York/Peel /Durham Groundwater Study be
amended to provide an additional $35,370 to cover the extra costs of a deep drill hole
completed earlier this summer.
CARRIED
572
BACKGROUND
Earlier this year, at Meeting #2/01, the Authority approved a strategic work plan for the York
Peel Durham groundwater study. A component of the work plan involved a drilling program,
led by Credit Valley Conservation, on the Oak Ridges Moraine within subwatershed 13 of the
Credit Watershed. The drilling program commenced in June and was completed in July 2002
The drilling program did not proceed as expected. From existing information, the bedrock
surface at the drilling location was anticipated at a depth of approximately 50 to 70 m (150 to
220 ft). Not only were these initial estimates of the bedrock wrong, they were in fact, very
wrong. Bedrock was eventually intersected at a depth of 180 m (590 ft), nearly three times the
depth expected. As the drilling advanced past the estimated bedrock depth, a decision had to
be made in the field whether or not to continue with the drilling of the borehole. The YPD
Steering committee, consisting of hydrogeologists and planners from the various partner
agencies (Regional Municipalities as well as Conservation Authorities), agreed that the
borehole was significant and that it was important to intersect the bedrock surface regardless
of how deep the drilling had to proceed. It was recognized at the time of drilling that there was
sufficient funds in the YPD budget to cover such additional expenditures.
The determination of the bedrock surface at such a tremendous depth suggests that we still
have much work to do in order to better understand the subsurface geology of the Oak Ridges
Moraine. Not only does the borehole drastically change the geological understanding of this
area of the moraine, but in addition, the deep bedrock valley into which the well was drilled is
also likely to play an important role in conducting groundwater from the escarpment area
towards the east. Currently the bedrock valley is thought to be an extension of a valley that
stretches eastward towards Bolton. If this proves to be the case, the further definition of this
valley and its hydrogeology will likely have implications on the water budget of the Humber
River watershed.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
A memorandum of understanding was prepared with the CVC to undertake this work under the
umbrella of the YPD Groundwater Management Strategy Study. An initial transfer of $50,000
from the YPD budget was executed earlier in the year. The recommended additional transfer
of $35,370 will be sufficient for CVC to cover the entire costs of the drilling along with the
associated sampling and laboratory analyses costs. Upon approval of this report, staff will
make the necessary arrangements to have the funds transferred to the CVC. There are
sufficient funds in the York Peel Durham Groundwater Management Strategy Study (Account
#115 -90) budget to cover the costs of the above projects.
Report prepared by: Steve Holysh, 905 - 336 -1158, extension 246
For Information contact: Steve Holysh, 905 - 336 -1158, extension 246
Sonya Meek, 416- 661 -6600 extension 5253
Date: August 28, 2002
573
RES. #B118/02 - 76 BRUMWELL STREET SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
Authorization for party status before the Ontario Municipal Board on a
proposed plan of subdivision and City of Toronto (Scarborough
Community Council) zoning by -law and Official Plan Amendment
applications made by Candituft Developments Inc. involving an
enclosure of a tributary of Adams Creek.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Maria Augimeri
THAT party status before the Ontario Municipal Board on referalls made by Candituft
Developments Inc. related to a proposed plan of subdivision and City of Toronto
(Scarborough Community Council) zoning by -law and Official Plan Amendments, be
authorized;
THAT staff continue to work closely with our municipal partners by providing technical
assistance in order to Insure that the natural resource features and functions associated
with the Adams Creek tributary and valley lands are protected for the long term;
THAT staff receive legal representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Prehearing
Conference;
That staff report back to the Authority on the status of the discussions and seek further
direction following additional prehearing conferences when the parties to the hearing and
related issues have been identified and better understood and wether party status and
legal representation needs to be maintained;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council) be so
advised.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Candituft Developments Inc. owns approximately 1.5 hectares of land, legally described as Lot
1 and Part of Lot 2, Plan 4010, and known municipally as 76 Brumwell Street in the City of
Toronto. The subject lands are located on the westside of Brumwell Street just south of
Highway 2A in the former City of Scarborough. The lands consist of the rear portions of
several typical residential lots in this area that front onto Brumwell Street or Centennial Road to
the west. At some previous point these rear portions were likely severed from the existing lots
and combined with one lot (76 Brumwell Street) to gain the necessary access to a municipal
right of way. The subject lands are traversed by a watercourse know as Adams Creek which is
an independant watershed located between the Highland Creek and Rouge River Watersheds
(See Exhibit A). The proposal by Candituft involves the enclosure of Adams Creek and the
filling and grading of the valley system (approximately .70 hectares) to allow for the
development of 19 residential lots as a plan of subdvision (See Exhibit B).
574
The lands are currently designated Low Density Residential (RL) in the City of Toronto Official
Plan and zoned for Single Family Residential. However, the subject lands are identified on
Map 5 of the Metropolitan Green Space System which illustrates the lands that are designated
as Open Space within the City's Official Plan. As a result of this conflict between the Official
Plan designation and the illustration of the lands on the Metropolitan Green Space System
mapping, City staff have required the applicant to apply for an Official Plan Amendment.
Site Environment
The subject property is comprised of cleared residential lands which gradually become more
vegetated and environmentally significant toward the western limit of the property. The central
area has been assessed by TRCA ecologists as regenerating new growth forest. Although a
comprehensive habitat assessment has not been completed for the property, ecologist opinion
is that this area provides limited habitat for tolerant species that are more typical in
buffer /transition areas to older growth forests.
The northwestern portion of the property contains what has become the headwater area for
Adams Creek as a significant portion of the upstream flows appear to have been diverted as a
result of previous works associated with Highway 2A. It appears as though the remaining flows
are the result of groundwater upwelling which has created a low -lying wetland area within the
valley corridor in this portion of the property.
The southwestern portion of the property contains the more defined portion of the creek where
consistent flows have been observed during several site visits. The entire valley corridor and
approximately 10- metres of tableland in this portion consist of significant forest area. TRCA
ecologists estimate that this forested area supports more significant diverse habitat as it has
much older undisturbed growth and the environmental system extends beyond these property
boundaries within the entire valley corridor downstream until Adams creek is crossed by the
southern portion of Brumwell Street.
Although the watercourse does not show up on the TRCA's Fill Regulation Mapping or the
Ontario Base Mapping (OBM), it has been identified on the Authority's digital mapping of the
areas designated as Fill Line Extension (See Exhibit A). The Fill Line Extension areas are those
areas that Authority staff intend to recommend for inclusion into the Fill Regulation Regulation
jurisdiction identified under Ontario Regulation 158. In accordance with Ontario Regulation
158, the applicants currently require TRCA approval for alterations to the watercourse and /or
construction within the Regulatory Floodplain.
The Appeal
The appeals by Candituft relate to the City of Toronto Council's refusal to enact the proposed
Zoning By -law and Official Plan Amendment applications and Council's failure to make a
decision respecting the proposed plan of subdivision. As a result of conflicting opinions
among various departments, to date City staff have not been able to forward a formal
recommendation on these applications to City Council.
On July 25, 2002, The Ontario Municipal Board notified City staff of the applicant's appeal and
the subsequent prehearing date of August 29, 2002.
575
RATIONALE
Authority staff recognize the importance of maintaining and protecting existing watershed
functions as it relates to the supply of baseflow and the support of all associated natural
heritage features. Although staff have not had an opportunity to comprehensively study the
habitat components of Adams Creek and the adjacent natural heritage features, we have
visited the site on several occasions to confirm that the subject lands qualify as an area that
should be protected in accordance with the policies of the Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program (VSCMP). This position has been clearly stated to City staff in several
meetings and letters throughout the review process for the subject applications.
It is understood that the contiguous valley lands south of the subject property are owned by
the City. In the upcoming weeks Authority staff intend to undertake further analysis of the
habitat and environmental conditions in this area to assist in drawing conclusions concerning
the nature and function of the habitat on the subject property.
Therefore staff are recommending that we continue to offer advise and technical support to the
City staff specific to the natural heritage functions of the subject property. We further
recommend party status be requested and maintained at the OMB so that we can continue our
full participation in the planning process until further details are finalized and /or all of our issues
can be addressed.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Authority staff expect to be in a position to estimate the costs associated with this hearing once
the details pertaining to the hearing length have been determined.
Report prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: August 27, 2002
Attachments: 2
576
Attachment 1
577
8LS
CO
C/3
E
0
v
co
m
.0
0
0.
0
F-
y
.CZ
Cl1
CO
0
CO
y
O
O.
O
CL
Fie 1 TF OPA 2002 0002, TF ZBL 2001 0018 & TF SUB 2001 0002
Z ;uawyoeuy
NEW BUSINESS
RES. #B119/02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff meet with City of Toronto
Parks staff and other appropriate City staff to discuss management of the problem of
damage and destruction of vegetation at Humber Bay Shores resulting from the use of
Waterfront Drive by construction vehicles.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:27 a.m., on September 6, 2002.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
CARRIED
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
579
THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #9/02
October 4, 2002
The Executive Committee Meeting #9/02, was held via public conference call, on Friday,
October 4, 2002. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 11:08 a.m.
PRESENT
Lorna Bissell Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
REGRETS
Maria Augimeri Member
Ron Moeser Member
RES.#B120/02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Jim McMaster
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #8/02, held on September 6, 2002, be approved.
CARRIED
CORRESPONDENCE
(a) A letter dated October 2, 2002 from Madeline McDowell, Chair, Humber Heritage
Committee, in regards to a possible TRCA agreement for water quality modelling in
rural watersheds using the Agricultural Non -point Source model.
RES. #B121 /02 - CORRESPONDENCE
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Michael Di Biase
THAT above -noted correspondence (a) be received.
CARRIED
580
CORRESPONDENCE (A)
"Madeleine McDowell" <m.mcdowell @sympatico.ca> on 10/02/2002
12:11:15 PM
Please respond to "Madeleine McDowell" <m.mcdowell @sympatico.ca>
To: Kathy Stranks /MTRCA @MTRCA
cc:
Subject: Executive Committee meeting # 9
Executive Committee,
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
5 Shoreham Drive Downsview
October 2nd, 2002
163 Humbercrest Blvd.,
Toronto, Ontario M6S -4L5
Dear Chairman O'Brien:
I am very pleased to se the Authority contemplating entering into an agreement to conduct
water quality modeling in rural watersheds using the Agricultural Non -point Source model.
This has long been a concern for my committee. The preservation of rural environment is so
very crucial, along with the conservation of clean water, which is essential to them and coexisting
urban areas.
I am delighted at this aggressive enhancement of protection for the water quality of rivers and
streams, which are the focus of our watersheds
Possibly some of the findings in the area of 'relative impact of different land cover' could have
a transfer value to urban areas.
Thank you for your kind attention,
Yours Sincerely
Madeleine McDowell
Chair, Humber Heritage Committee
581
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#B122/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component/Rouge River Watershed
Transgate Inc., CFN 33547. Purchase of property located east of Staines
Road, north of Finch Avenue, under the "Natural Heritage Lands
Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", Flood Plain and
Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 6.39 acres ( 2.585 hectares), more
or Tess, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of vacant land, be purchased from
Transgate Inc., in the City of Toronto (East Community), being Blocks 313 and 314, on a
draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Schaeffer & Dzaldov Limited under their Job No.
00- 010 -0 -1 B, located east of Staines Road, north of Finch Avenue;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, TRCA Meeting #9100, October 27, 2000 approving the Natural Heritage
Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owners solicitor, Gary Siskind LLP.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge
River Watershed.
582
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
This parcel of land will be turned over to the City of Toronto under the terms of the existing
management agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: September 24, 2002
Attachment:1
583
Attachment 1
RE: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component/Rouge River Watershed
Transgate Inc.
CFN 33547
SUBJECT PROPERTY
584
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES. #B123/02 -
APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.1 - 8.1.17, inclusive and 8.1.30), which are listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.1 FELIX BROCKWAY
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 9, Plan BR 31, (5 Beatty Avenue), in
the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property
owned by Felix Brockway.
The purpose is to place and remove fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek in
order to facilitate the construction of a 23.8 square metre (256 square foot) detached garage
and to replace an existing rear yard 0.7 metre garden retaining wall.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan of Proposed Detached Garage on 5 Beatty Avenue (Part of Lot 9, BR -31),
City of Brampton, prepared by applicant, dated September 16, 2002, received by
TRCA September 18, 2002.
• Grading and Sediment Control Plan, for Proposed Detached Garage and garden
retaining wall on 5 Beatty Avenue (Part of Lot 9, BR -31), City of Brampton, prepared
by applicant, dated September 25, 2002, received by TRCA September 25, 2002.
• Cross Section of Proposed Grading and Garden Retaining Wall on 5 Beatty Avenue
(Part of Lot 9, BR -31), City of Brampton, prepared by applicant, dated September 25,
2002, received by TRCA September 25, 2002.
585
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek
in order to facilitate the development of a 23.8 square metre (256 square foot) detached
garage. The proposed structure will be located in the front of the pre- existing dwelling, which
is part of an established residential subdivision, northeast of Clarence Street and Main Street.
The subject property contains a small portion of the Regional Floodplain, however all proposed
works will be outside of the floodplain area. The proposed garage was part of a recent
variance application which established the proposed location. Although, the garage backs
onto a small slope, it is setback further than existing houses on the subject property and
neighbouring lot. Authority staff visited the site and have no concerns with slope stability for
either the garage or garden wall.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed structure is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore, there
will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works will occur approximately 70 metres from the Etobicoke Creek. Sediment
control measures will be installed around the proposed works to prevent construction
generated sediments from entering the watercourse. All excavated fill material will be stabilized
or removed from this site.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed structure is located within the Fill Regulated Area, but is consistent with existing
development in the same corridor reach. There are no geotechnical issues related to the
proposal, and no significant natural resource features will be affected by the proposal. All
disturbed and exposed areas will be revegetated following construction, with particular focus
given to planting appropriate species on the slope around the garage in order to mitigate
potential future erosion concerns.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 42.2. (E), Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33502
Report Prepared by: Kellie McCormack, extension 5269
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: September 19, 2002
586
Application #: 366 /02 /BRAM
CITY OF PICKERING
8.1.2 PETER AND ANTONIA KOLEROS
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 96, 97, Plan 283, (496 Rougemount
Drive), in the City of Pickering, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Peter and Antonia Koleros.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area for the Rouge River, in
order to facilitate the construction of a 127 square meter garage and living space addition to
the side and front of an existing single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Lot Plan Al, Basement and Footings A2, Ground Floor A3, Sections A6,
Erosion Control Details Figure B, prepared by C.T. Design, dated January 29, 2002,
received July 17, 2002.
• Terraprobe Recommendations to be followed by the applicant, prepared by
Terraprobe, dated September 4, 2002, received September 4, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Rouge
River, in order to facilitate the construction of a 127 square meter garage and living space
addition to the side and front of an existing single family dwelling. The proposed works are to
be undertaken on tableland at the front of the existing house and garage, more than 85 meters
from the watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Rouge River, therefore the storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
Sediment/erosion control methods (silt fence) will be installed and maintained during the
construction process to prevent sediment and debris from reaching the river. Consultant
recommendations have been provided which will be followed throughout the construction
process, in order to ensure that there will be no immediate or long -term effects on
erosion /sedimentation of the watercourse /valley feature. No sedimentation of the watercourse
will occur as a result of the proposed works.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on tableland at the front of the existing house and
garage, more than 85 meters from the watercourse. There are no fisheries concerns associated
with this project. Consultant recommendations have been provided which will be followed
throughout the construction process, in order to ensure that there will be no immediate or
Tong -term effects on erosion /sedimentation of the watercourse /valley feature.
587
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (B) - Major Additions - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33397
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: July 31, 2002
Application #: 304 /02 /PICK
8.1.3 ALAN MCMACKIN
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Plan 274, (314 Dyson Road), in the
City of Pickering, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Alan
McMackin.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Rouge
River, in order to facilitate the demolition of the existing single family dwelling, and the
construction of a new single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• RED -LINE REVISED Basement Plan, First Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan, Loft Plan,
Section A -A, Right Side Elevation, Left Side Elevation, prepared by New Castle
Drafting and Design, dated September 9, 2002, received September 16, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River, in
order to facilitate the demolition of the existing house, and the construction of a new single
family dwelling. The works are further removed from the top of bank than the existing
development on the site, resulting in an overall improvement to the adjacent natural system.
Control of Floodina:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River.
The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will therefore not be affected.
Pollution:
Sediment/erosion control (silt fence) will be installed and maintained during the construction
process to prevent sediment and debris from reaching the river. No sedimentation of the
watercourse will occur as a result of the proposed works.
588
Conservation of Land:
All proposed works are to be undertaken on tableland more than 10 meters from the top of
bank, and 50 meters from the watercourse. There are no significant resource features on site,
and no slope stability /geo- technical concerns associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33492
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 18, 2002
Application #: 357 /02 /PICK
8.1.4 WHITEVALE GOLF CLUB
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 30, Concession 4, (2985 Golf Club Road),
in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned
by Whitevale Golf Club.
The purpose is to place fill within a fill regulated area to facilitate the construction of a drainage
swale and berm situated 5 to 10 metres from the top of bank of the Duffins Creek valley slope
in order to alleviate a drainage problem on the Whitevale Golf Course lands.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan Profile and Cross - Sectional Drawings prepared by Whitevale Golf Course, date
received September 5, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place and remove fill within a fill regulated area to facilitate the construction
of a drainage swale and berm, situated 5 to 10 metres from the top of bank of the Duffins Creek
valley slope in order to alleviate a drainage problem on the Whitevale Golf Course lands.
Authority staff completed a bioengineering project for slope stabilization works on the adjacent
valley lands in the year 2000. As part of this project, Authority staff recognized that water
flowing over the slope was causing some of the erosion on the slope. Subsequently, Authority
staff recommended that the proposed drainage swale be constructed to redirect flows onto low
lying areas on the tableland portion, to permit groundwater infiltration rather than direct runoff
over the slope. The proposed works follow staff recommendations.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm floodplain, therefore there are
no impacts to flood storage or conveyance.
589
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the proposed works and the top of bank in order to restrict
sediment entering the adjacent watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are required to alleviate a drainage problem on the site and reduce
erosion on the valley slope. The works will be done in accordance with recommendations
made by Authority staff. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the
project. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33484
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 11, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
Application #: 346/02/PICK
8.1.5 EDWARD CHU
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Plan M -453, (32 Brookfield Road), in
the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Edward Chu.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a 103 square meter (338 square foot) kitchen addition, and a 46
square meter (160 square foot) garage addition to the front (south) side of an existing single
family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of to in accordance with the following documents and
plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, North and South Elevations, West and East Elevations, Foundation, Existing
and Proposed Main Floor Plans, Existing and Proposed Second Floor Plans, Roof
Plan, prepared by Baycrest General Contractors, dated July 2002, received August 14,
2002
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
590
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a 103 square meter (338 square foot) kitchen addition, and a 46
square meter (160 square foot) garage addition, to the front (south) side of an existing single
family dwelling. The proposed works will not extend closer to the valley feature than the
existing residence.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Don River. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will therefore not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located more than 160 meters (524 feet) from the Don River. The area
between the works and the river include a road, a house and manicured lawns. Sediment from
construction will reach the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will not extend more than 2 meters (8 feet) from the front of the existing
dwelling. The area of land to be disturbed has been previously altering in the construction of
the original home and driveway. There will be no to changes to grades, and there are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the site.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33433
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 21, 2002
Application #: 326/02/TOR
8.1.6 CHRISTINE AND MARCO SCHEPIS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 24, Plan M -673, (4 Hardwood Gate), in
the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Christine and Marco Schepis.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated area of the Humber River, in
order to facilitate the construction of an in- ground swimming pool at the rear of an existing
single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Construction Notes, Site Plan, prepared by Pioneer Pools, dated August 27, 2002,
received August 28, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by Pioneer Pools, dated September 10, 2002, received
September 10, 2002.
591
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in
order to facilitate construction of an in- ground swimming pool at the rear of an existing single
family dwelling.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River.
The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The.proposed works are to be undertaken on tableland more than 5 metres from the top of
bank, and 50 metres from the watercourse. All excavated fill material will be removed from the
site.
Conservation of Land:
All works are proposed to be undertaken on tableland more than 5 metres from the top of
bank. There are no significant resource features on site, and no slope stability /geotechnical
concerns associated with this project. The proposed works are consistent with existing uses
along the corridor reach.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (D) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33431
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extenslon 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 21, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (MIDTOWN COMMUNITY)
Application #: 325/02/TOR
8.1.7 CITY OF TORONTO
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
(Moatfield Drive and Duncan Mill Road - Site 17), in the City of Toronto (Midtown
Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned
by the City of Toronto.
The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and alter a watercourse to facilitate the
replacement of a storm outfall structure on the west bank of the East Don River and the
construction of a 2 metre high armour stone retaining wall on the up and downstream sides of
the outfall to provide the necessary erosion protection.
592
The permit will be issued for the period of July 26, 2002 to July 25, 2004 in accordance with the
following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Site Plan prepared by City of Toronto, revision date May 30, 2002,
date received May 31, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and alter a watercourse to facilitate the
replacement of a storm outfall structure on the west bank of the East Don River and the
construction of a 2 metre high armour stone retaining wall on the up and downstream sides of
the outfall to provide the necessary erosion protection. The works involve the removal of the
existing storm sewer outfall which has become exposed due to the embankment eroding on
both the upstream and downstream sides, creating an erosion scar, and the construction of a
new outfall which will be keyed into the existing embankments and the new retaining wall
structures.
Control of Flooding:
The new outfall structure will be built back into the existing embankments which have eroded
and resulted in the existing structure projecting out into the watercourse. The proposed works
will therefore maintain the existing stream profile and will not impact on the storage or
conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The works will be constructed in the dry using a coffer dam method to divert flow around the
work area. Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained during
construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
Potential impacts to fish habitat can be mitigated through the use of erosion control measures,
site restoration and completing instream works during warm water timing guidelines of July 1
to March 31. All works will be undertaken within the City of Toronto easement and completed
from top of bank.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32978
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: February 25, 2002
593
Application #: 088/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY)
8.1.8 JETTE AND IKE GROSMAN
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 24, Plan 2069,
(72 Don River Boulevard), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council
Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Jette and Ike
Grosman.
The purpose is to place fill and undertake minor regrading within a regulated area to facilitate
the construction of an inground swimming pool in the Regional Storm floodplain associated
with the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Site Plan submitted by applicant, date received August 27, 2002.
• Letter of Intent with regard to the removal of all excess fill material from the site,
prepared by the applicant, date received September 26, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate fill and undertake minor regrading to facilitate the construction of
an inground swimming pool in the rear yard. The subject property is located on the east side
of the Don River, within a historically developed area of the valley, with the front portion of the
lot being located outside of the Regional Storm floodplain and the rear portion, adjacent to the
river being within the floodplain. The existing single family home which is situated above the
floodplain, was constructed in accordance with TRCA Permit C- 00020, issued February 11,
2000. The applicant now wishes to install a pool directly behind the house and within the
floodplain.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed pool will be located within the Regional Storm floodplain, but outside the
hydraulic floodway. Existing grades will be maintained, therefore there will be no impact to the
control of flooding or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the proposed works and the top of river bank to prevent
construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The pool will be located outside of the floodway within the manicured rear yard area. The
property is located within a historically developed area of the valley and the proposed works
are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. Existing grades will be
maintained and the proposed works will not involve any removal of riparian vegetation, nor will
there be any impact on significant resource features. There are no slope stability /geotechnical
or fisheries concerns associated with this project.
594
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33494
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 18, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY)
Application #: 359/02/TOR
8.1.9 CHRISTINE VAANDEING & KEN KOMINEK
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 26, Plan 5440, (111 Botany Hill Road), in
the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by Christine Vaandeing & Ken
Kominek.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the
removal of an existing 1.5 meter high timber retaining wall that is failing, to be replaced with a
new 1.5 meter high 'alien block' retaining wall in the same place.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• RED -LINE REVISED Site Plan, Slope Plan View, Cross - Section, and Retaining Wall
Details, Drawing No. S1, prepared by Virtual Engineers, dated August 2002, date
received September 4, 2002.
• Sediment Fence and Site Restoration Details, prepared by Almeida Brothers
Contracting, dated August 14, 2002, received August 19, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the
removal of an existing 1.5 meter high timber retaining wall, approximately 9.5 meters in length.
The existing retaining wall is located at the top of slope and is in a state of disrepair. A new
'allen block' wall will replace the existing timber wall and will be constructed in the same
location, there will be no increase in length or height.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm floodplain of the Highland
Creek. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
595
Pollution:
The proposed works are located approximately 80 meters from the Highland Creek
watercourse. Erosion control methods (silt fence) will be installed and maintained throughout
the construction process. Sedimentation of the watercourse will not occur.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works involve the re- construction of a timber retaining wall which has been
located at this site for forty years. There will be no increase in length or height of the proposed
replacement wall. The proposed works will not impact any significant resource features, will
maintain existing grades, and is consistent with existing uses along the corridor reach.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33468
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: August 30, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 339/02/TOR
8.1.10 VINCENZO AND NELLA MACCHIA
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 42, Plan 65M -3377, (127 Treelawn
Boulevard), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Vincenzo and Nella Macchia.
The purpose is to construct an inground pool partially within the Fill Regulated Area of the
Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Pool details - The Macchia Residence, prepared by Solda Pools dated September 12,
2002 received by TRCA on September 13, 2002.
• Section A -A - The Macchia Residence, prepared by Solda Pools dated September 12,
2002, received by TRCA on September 13, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to remove and place fill to facilitate construction of an inground pool and
armour stone retaining wall within the Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The proposed
works are located on a lot within an approved plan of subdivision within the Humber River
Valley.
596
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impact on
the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be installed between the proposed works and the valley.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are set back from the top of bank and there are no geotechnical issues
related to the proposal. The landowner is planting additional native trees and shrubs to
provide an additional buffer to the valley.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33489
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: September 16, 2002
TOWN OF CALEDON
Application #: 356 /02/VAUG
8.1.11 KEVIN BRUCE
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 36, 37, Block 1, Plan BOL -7, (95 Willow Street),
in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Kevin Bruce.
The purpose is to construct a mudroom by enclosing an existing carport foundation attached
to a residential house located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area in
the Bolton Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan Showing Existing Topographical Features on Part of Lot 36 and 37, Block 1,
Bol -7, prepared by Biason Surveying Incorporated, dated July 18, 2002.
• Plan of 98 Willow Street Mudroom Addition (4 Sheets), prepared by K. Bruce, dated
received September 18, 2002, redline revised by TRCA, September 25, 2002, re:
floodproofing all electrical outlets
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
597
Proposal:
The purpose is to construct a mudroom by enclosing an existing carport foundation attached
to a residential house located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area at
98 Willow Street in Bolton. The subject property is located within the Bolton Special Policy
Area (SPA), which allows for development provided it can be floodproofed to the Regional
Storm Elevation or when not feasible, the 350 -year Storm Elevation. The finished floor
elevation of the existing house is approximately 8 cm below the 350 -year Storm Elevation and
as such, the applicant has requested that the mudroom addition be constructed to match this
elevation. Engineering staff have confirmed that floodproofing to the Regional Storm Elevation
is not practical and feel that the 350 -year elevation should be applied. Furthermore,
engineering staff acknowledge that the 8 cm of difference between the existing floor elevation
and the 350 -year elevation is typically within the margin of error of the 350 -year Flood Elevation
calculation and given the nature of the application, should be acceptable. A structural engineer
has stamped the plans indicating that the structures can withstand the 350 year velocity. All
wiring and electrical components will be flood - proofed.
Control of Flooding:
Given the small size of the proposed structure there are no anticipated changes to the storage
or conveyance of flood water as a result of this proposal.
Pollution:
No sedimentation of the watercourse is expected as the proposed works will be constructed
within the confines of an existing wall at the base. The area is sufficiently setback from the
watercourse, with a roadway and residential housing located between the proposed work and
the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The property is located within a developed portion of the Humber River valley and the
proposed mudroom is consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. The
proposed work will not disturb any vegetation or impact any significant resource features, as it
involves constructing on an existing structural base. There are no geotechnical or fisheries
related concerns associated with this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.1(B)- Development/Redevelopment within
Designated Special Policy Areas- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
CFN: 33485
Report Prepared by: Erin Pratley, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: September 11, 2002
Application #: 347/02 /CAL
8.1.12 VINCENT LIMINA
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 7, Concession 8, (13336 Nunnville
Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Vincent Limina.
598
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated area to facilitate the
construction of storage shed.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan Showing Proposed Building, prepared by Bison Surveying Incorporated,
dated October 28, 1994, revised May 28, 2002, redline revised by Vincent Limina.
• Light Duty Silt Fence Barrier, Ontario Provincial Standard Drawing, dated February 01,
1996.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose of the proposal is to excavate and place fill, using a balance of cut and fill within a
Fill Regulated area of the Humber River, in order to facilitate the construction of a storage shed
(54 m2). The subject property lies outside of the Bolton SPA area within the Town of Bolton, but
it is adjacent to the valley slope. This proposal was reviewed by TRCA staff during a recent
minor variance application, at which time staff raised concerns about potential impacts to slope
stability. However, the Authority's engineer visited the site and reviewed the proposal and had
no concerns with slope stability.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, and therefore will
not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Silt Fencing will be in place for the duration of the construction, and remain until seeding is
complete, in order to prevent sedimentation of the adjacent watercourse. The proposed work
is a balanced cut and fill, so no excess fill will be created.
Conservation of Land:
TRCA staff have been on -site to confirm that no geotechnical issues exist. All disturbed areas
will be seeded with a grass seed mix. As there will be no instream works, there are no
concerns related to fish habitat loss.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E)- Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures -
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33486
Report Prepared by: Erin Pratley, extension 5244
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: September 11, 2002
599
Application #: 350 /02 /CAL
TOWN OF MARKHAM
8.1.13 AVALON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 15, Plan 71, (26
Church Lane), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Avalon Development Corporation.
The purpose is to raise the grade of, and to construct minor additions to, an existing single
family, heritage dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing No. SP -1, Grading, Erosion Control and Restoration Plan, prepared by
Sernas Associates, date received September 18, 2002
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to raise the grade of the existing single family heritage dwelling, and to
construct minor additions to its east and west sides. The north side of the house backs onto,
and is sufficiently set back from, the stable top of bank of the East Don River valley. TRCA staff
first accepted the proposal through a site plan application circulated by the Town of Markham.
During the site plan application's review, a geotechnical report was accepted by TRCA
technical staff to confirm the stability of the adjacent bank, and the soundness of the proposed
grade change to raise the existing house by 0.8 metres.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the East Don
River, and therefore impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters will not result.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be in place for the duration of construction in order to prevent
sediment from entering the adjacent valley lands and watercourse. In addition, all excess fill
will be removed from site, and any disturbed soils will be stabilized.
Conservation of Land:
There are no outstanding geotechnical issues related to the proposal, and there are no
fisheries issues related to the project. No natural resource features will be affected by the
proposed works, and any disturbed soils will be stabilized and restored upon completion of
construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 C) - Minor Additions, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
600
CFN: 33400
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: August 7, 2002
Application #: 307 /02 /MARK
8.1.14 ANDREW BOS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 93, Plan 7980, (30 Squire Baker's Lane),
in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Andrew Bos.
The purpose is to construct an approximately 144 - square foot, one - storey addition with
crawlspace, to the rear of an existing single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing No. A -1, prepared by The Gregory Design Group, date received September 4,
2002.
• Drawing No. A -2, prepared by The Gregory Design Group, date received September 4,
2002 - redline revised for installation and maintenance of sediment control fence.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct an approximately 288 - square foot addition that will consist of a
sunroom at grade, a second - storey bedroom, and a below - ground crawl space. The proposal
was first accepted by TRCA staff through the review of a variance application, circulated by the
Town of Markham, for increased dwelling length. The proposed addition is adjacent to, and
will be sufficiently set back from, a stable top of bank of Exhibition Creek.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Exhibition Creek,
and therefore the conveyance and storage of flood waters will not be affected.
Pollution:
A sediment control fence will be in place for the duration of construction in order to prevent
sedimentation of the adjacent valley lands and watercourse. In addition, all excess fill will be
removed from the site and any disturbed soils will be stabilized upon completion of the works.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with the proposal, and no natural
resource features will be affected by the proposed works. Any disturbed soils will be restored
and stabilized.
601
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 C) - Minor Additions, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33475
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: September 9, 2002
Application #: 341/02 /MARK
8.1.15 WOODBINE MACKENZIE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Part Lot 22, 23, Concession 4, (East of Woodbine Avenue, North of Major
MacKenzie Drive), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Woodbine Mackenzie Developments Limited.
The purpose is to Construct within a floodplain and alter a watercourse tributary of the Rouge
River to facilitate the construction of a road crossing, watermain and sanitary sewer to service
Draft Plan of Subdivision 19TM- 01002, Town of Markham, East Cathedral Community.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2007 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Grading Plan 3, Drawing 503, prepared by Stantec Consulting Limited, Project
60620384, dated May 2002, revised to September 24, 2002.
• Street B, Drawing 404, prepared by Stantec Consulting Limited, Project 60620384,
dated May 2002, revised to September 24, 2002.
• Stormwater Management Pond Details, Drawings 903, 904 and 905, prepared by
Stantec Consulting Limited, Project 60620384, dated May 2002, revised to September
24, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a road crossing, watermain and sanitary sewer across a tributary
watercourse of the Rouge River. The road crossing shall utilize a precast concrete -span culvert
which will span the channel banks of the watercourse and will not disturb or impact the existing
low -flow channel. Sanitary and watermain crossings will require instream works which will be
constructed in the dry. The works are being implemented to service draft plan of subdivision
19TM- 01002, Town of Markham. This subdivision is within the East Cathedral Lands to which
an approved Master Environmental Servicing Plan is in place. The proposed works are in
conformity to this MESP. Future applications for this site to construct the stormwater
management pond and associated infrastructure will be submitted and reviewed in the near
future.
602
Control of Flooding:
TRCA engineering staff are satisfied that the culvert crossing is appropriately design to convey
the Regional Flows and there will be no impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Detailed sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed to prevent sedimentation of the
valley corridor and watercourse. In- stream works to install the watermain and sanitary sewer
crossing will be conducted in the dry with the use of temporary coffer dams and flow pumps to
divert water if necessary.
Conservation of Land:
Detailed restoration plantings using the appropriate densities and species of native trees and
shrubs will be implemented for all disturbed areas, and to enhance the valley corridor. No
instream works are proposed for this application and the works are not considered to be a
HADD (Harmful, Alteration, Disruption and Destruction of fish habitat) and the applicant will be
issued a letter of advice as per our agreement with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
Future applications for stormwater management facilities and the removal of an existing farm
driveway and culvert crossing will be accompanied by detailed vaileyland restoration plans.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are in conformity to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33452
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: September 23, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 369/02 /MARK
8.1.16 LESLIE A. FLUXGOLD
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 88, 89, Plan 1923, (138 Weldrick
Road West), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Virgil Magistrale.
The purpose is to place fill within a regulated area of the Don River to facilitate construction of a
single family dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Grading Plan for Part of Lots 88 and 89 Registered Plan 1923 prepared by P.
Salna Company Limited dated August 15, 2002 received by TRCA on August 28, 2002.
• Landscape Plan -138 Weldrick Road prepared by McWllliam and Associates dated
September 18, 2002 and received by TRCA on September 19, 2002.
• Letter of undertaking prepared by Develco Management Services dated September
19, 2002 and received by TRCA on September 19, 2002.
603
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To construct a single family dwelling in a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River. The lot is
currently vacant and is considered an infill lot. The subject property is within an existing
residential neighbourhood of Richmond Hill and a watercourse flows on the eastern side of the
proposed house. The proposed home is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain
and is set back from the top of bank.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed house will be located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain and therefore
there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be constructed between the proposed home and the watercourse prior to
construction and will remain until the works are complete and the area has been planted and
sodded to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The property is located within a developed portion of the Don River Valley. The subject
property is currently a residential lot. There are no resource features within the proposed
development area. The applicant is improving the buffer between the home and the
watercourse through planting of native, non - invasive species.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (G) - Infilling - of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33465
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: August 29, 2002
Application #: 337/02/RH
8.1.17 GRANRED INVESTMENTS LTD.
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 24, Concession 2 ,
(south of Elgin Mills Road, west of Leslie Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill,
Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Granred Investments
Ltd..
The purpose is to construct a stormwater outfall and low flow channel within a Regional Storm
floodplain and Regulated Area of the Rouge River.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2007 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
604
• Storm Drainage Plan, Drawing 2; Lot Grading Plan, Drawing 3, Holly Drive Plan,
Drawing 4, and Sediment Control Plan, Drawing 6, all prepared by Sabourin Kimble &
Associates Limited, Project 02:989, dated June 2002, received by TRCA staff August
6th, 2002 and September 19th, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking dated September 24th, 2002 from Alan B. Kimble, Granred
Investments, committing to making required revisions to Restoration Details as
appropriate.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to alter a waterway and conduct associated grading within the floodplain of a
Rouge River tributary to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall headwall and low -flow
channel. The works are being undertaken to service draft plan of subdivision 19T- 94008, Town
of Richmond Hill, which has been previously approved by the TRCA.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no change to existing grades within the floodplain and TRCA engineering staff
have indicated that there is no adverse impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Detailed sediment and erosion controls are to be implemented prior to the commencement of
construction to prevent sediment from entering the valleyland and watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
No instream works will be required for this proposal and the works do not constitute a HADD
(Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Distruction of fish habitat). The applicant will be issued a
Letter of Advice as per TRCA's Agreement with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. All
disturbed areas are to be restored and enhanced with the appropriate native species of trees
and woody shrubs.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33403
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: August 7, 2002
605
Application #: 308/02/RH
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES. #B124/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.18 - 8.1.29, inclusive), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items, for
which all the required Information was received and finalized as listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.18 JASPREET SOHI
To alter a waterway on Part Lot 2, Concession 2 , (256 Rutherford Road), in the City of
Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by 1347540
Ontario Ltd..
The purpose is to alter a watercourse to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall in an
area adjacent to the Etobicoke Creek that is designated for fill line extension by the TRCA.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004.
• Site Service and Grading Notes, Drawing No. G01 by SPNR Consultants Limited,
dated July 26, 2002, Revision B dated September 24, 2002, received by TRCA
September 24, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by Jaspreet Sohi, dated October 2, 2002; received by
TRCA October 2, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to alter a watercourse to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall in an
area adjacent to the Etobicoke Creek that is designated for Fill Line Extension by the TRCA.
The stormwater outfall is needed to service an industrial development proposal on the subject
property which is located in Brampton, situated on the east side of Rutherford Road between
Glidden to the south and Selby Road to the north. The elevation of the property prohibits the
ability to direct storm flows into the storm sewers along Rutherford Road. The outfall has been
designed as a low flow channel with dispersed flows into the adjacent channelized Etobicoke
Creek. No instream works will be required during construction.
Control of Flooding:
While Authority staff do not have floodplain mapping for this section of the Etobicoke Creek, it
is the of TRCA staff that this outfall is outside the minimal associated floodplain area. Given
that the proposal does not involve changes to existing grades, there will be no impacts to the
storage or conveyance of flooding.
606
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion controls shall be installed and maintained on site during construction
and all disturbed areas shall be restored following construction. The proposed stormwater
controls on the subject property will include the use of oil /grit seperators to provide for Level 2
water quality control.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation and there are no
geotechnical or fisheries related issues associated with the development area.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33480
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: September 11, 2002
CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
Application #: 348 /02 /BRAM
8.1.19 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - TRANSPORTATION AND WORKS
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
(Mimico Creek, south of Derry Road East, west of Goreway Drive /Highway 427 ,
north of Zahavy Way), in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as
located on the property owned by City of Mississauga - Transportation and Works.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (to install erosion control works) in a Fill Regulated
Area; to construct structures (live crib walls, armourstone walls) within a Regional Storm
floodplain; and to alter a watercourse (Mimico Creek) during the warmwater timing window
(July 1 to March 31) through temporary culvert crossing installations, through infilling with the
armourstone wall and through temporarily isolating the proposed works from the watercourse
in order to work in the dry.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004.
• Drawings: C -01- Cover- Mimlco Creek Stabilization and Erosion Control Project;
C- 02- General Notes and Plan; C -03- Proposed Channel Works - Access Routes and
Limits of Work; C -04- Sections 5 & 8; C -05- Section 6; C -06- Sections 7 &11;
C -07- Section 9; C -08- Section 10; C- 10- Planting Details; C- 11- Channel Rehabilitation
Details; dated June 2002; received July 22, 2002; prepared by Jones Consulting
Group Ltd.
• C -09A- Planting and Landscape Plan -Sites 5, 6, & 7; C- 09B- Planting and Landscape
Plans -Sites 8, 9, 10 &11; dated July 2002; received July 22, 2002; prepared by Jones
Consulting Group Ltd.
607
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to restoration and engineering
plans /documents); dated September 30, 2002; received October 1, 2002; prepared by
the City of Mississauga.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the installation of erosion control works at 7 sites along the Mimico
Creek from Zahavy Way northward to Derry Road, just west of Goreway Drive. The proposal
had been reviewed by staff during the Environmental Assessment process. The works will
involve the installation of live crib walls, armourstone walls and bioengineering to address the
existing erosion situation. The works will be located within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional
Storm floodplain of the Mimico Creek.
Control of Flooding:
It is anticipated by staff that the erosion control works and the fill associated with the works will
not have any implications to flooding. The City of Mississauga has provided a Letter of
Undertaking to provide the updated hydraulic analysis.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, coffer dam) will be implemented to ensure that
the construction - generated sediments will be minimized.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. Live
cuttings will be installed within the crib walls. There will be in stream works associated with this
project. The proposed erosion control measures (armourstone walls, live crib walls) will fill into
existing fish habitat and the proposed works will also need to be isolated from the watercourse
in order to work in the dry. Access to the opposite side of the stream will require a temporary
culvert installation. The in stream works will constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or
destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from the Department of
Fisheries and Oceans. However, the proposed erosion control works are compensatory in
nature and will provide a net benefit for fish habitat. When the DFO authorization has been
received, TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways"
permit. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. An existing
trail will be utilized as an access route on lands owned by the TRCA. An archaeological
investigation is required for any works on TRCA owned lands. When the clearance has been
received from TRCA's Archaeologist, staff will be in a position to issue the "Fill, Construction,
Alteration to Waterways" permit.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 3.3 B)1)- Policies and Procedures for Identifying
Watercourses and Alterations of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
608
CFN: 33380
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: September 12, 2002
Application #: 293/02/MISS
8.1.20 VILLABOIT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 5,
Concession 1 NDS, (1475 Dundas Street East), in the City of Mississauga,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Future Shop Ltd..
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct within the
Regional Storm Floodplain of the Etobicoke Creek to facilitate the construction of a building
addition onto an existing Future Shop building located within the Dixie /Dundas Special Policy
Area of Mississauga.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004.
• Grading Plan, drawing No. SW2, prepared by Cosburn Patterson Mather Limited,
dated July 2001, revised September 25, 2002.
• Exterior Elevations, drawing No. A -300, prepared by Venchlarutti Gagliardi Architect
Inc., dated August 10, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct within the
Regional Storm Floodplain of the Etobicoke Creek to facilitate the construction of a 1,304
square metre building addition onto an existing Future Shop building located within the
Dixie /Dundas Special Policy Area (SPA). The subject property is located on the north side of
Dundas Street just east of Dixie Road and contains an existing 2 -story Future Shop building
and associated parking area. In accordance with SPA criteria, development on the subject
property must be floodproofed to the Regional Storm Elevation or if not feasible, the 350 -year
elevation as a minimum. The applicant has demonstrated that the Regional Elevation is not
feasible given the existing elevation of the previous building and the established grades within
the parking area. The proposed addition will be flood - proofed to the 350 -year storm elevation
and certified to withstand the associated flood velocities.
Control of Flooding:
The proposal is located within the Regional Floodplain but outside of the hydraulic floodway.
This development is not expected to impact the conveyance or storage of floodwaters.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing shall be installed and maintained around the
construction area during the construction process.
609
Conservation of Land:
The proposal does not involve the removal of any significant vegetation and there are no
geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this application.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas
CFN: 33456
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: August 26, 2002
CITY OF PICKERING
Application #: 332/02/MISS
8.1.21 MOUNT PLEASANT GROUP OF CEMETERIES
To alter a waterway on Part Lot 17, 18, Concession 3, (2505 Brock Road North), in
the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by
Mount Pleasant Group Of Cemeteries.
The purpose is to construct an outfall structure for an existing stormwater management pond
on the Duffins Meadow Cemetery site, outleting into Urfe Creek, a tributary of Duffins Creek..
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004.
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by Mount Pleasant Group of Cemeteries to the TRCA,
dated October 2, 2002, advising that they will satisfactorily address the Authority's
outstanding concerns and requirements through the submission of revised drawings.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the construction of a concrete outfall structure for an existing stormwater
management pond situated on tableland on the west side of Urfe Creek, in order to facilitate
the expansion of the Duffins Meadow Cemetery. A clay lined pool basin constructed below the
outfall will dissipate flows and the rock rip -rap lined channel will further reduce possible
sediment and erosion impacts. The outfall structure will drain into a small ravine feature and
then into Urfe Creek approximately 30 metres away. The two permanent 750 mm. culverts will
be installed under existing pathways.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters as the upstream
drainage area is Tess than 125 hectares and has no associated Regional Storm floodplain.
Therefore, the proposed works will have no impacts on the control of flooding.
610
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed and maintained in order to ensure that
construction- generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The outfall structure will not outlet directly into the stream, but will be located approximately 30
metres upstream of Urfe Creek in order to minimize disturbance to the watercourse. The outfall
structure is located on the tableland portion of the site, and the proposed works do not involve
removal of riparian vegetation. The two permanent culverts will be installed under existing
pathways to better accommodate drainage of the site. All disturbed areas will be restored
following construction and extensive plantings will occur throughout the corridor reach on the
subject property.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32409
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 17, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (EAST YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 217/01/PICK
8.1.22 BROADVIEW BIRCH PROPERTIES INC.
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, Concession 2 FTB, (1258 to 1262
Broadview Avenue), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area),
Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Broadview Birch
Properties Inc..
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a fill regulated area of the Don River, in order to
facilitate the construction of 10 detached single family dwellings.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2007.
• RED -LINE REVISED Site Grading Plan SG1, Site Servicing Plan SS1, Standard Details
and Notes 01, D2, prepared by J. Foster Engineering, dated August 2002, received
September 16, 2002, Landscape Plan and Context Plan L1, prepared by John Lloyd
and Associates, dated August 2002, received September 16, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
611
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of 10 detached single family homes and associated landscaping, a
distance of 10 meters from the top of bank. Extensive landscaping plans have been included,
which will improve and stabilize the valley slope. A 2.5 metre section of property abutting the
valleylands will be conveyed to the Conservation Authority.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River.
The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
Sediment/erosion control methods (silt fence) will be installed and maintained during the
construction process in order to prevent sediment and debris from reaching the river.
Landscaping plans have been included, which will improve and stabilize the valley slope. No
sedimentation of the watercourse will occur. All excavated fill material will be removed from the
site.
Conservation of Land:
All works are proposed to be undertaken on tableland more than 10 meters (32 feet) from the
top of bank, and 45 meters (150 feet) from the watercourse. Detailed restoration plans have
been provided which will improve and stabilize the valley slope. There are no significant
resource features on site, and no slope stability /fisheries /geotechnical concerns associated
with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (A) - New Multi -lot and /or Large Lot Development
- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33490
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: September 16, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (HUMBER YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 354/02/TOR
8.1.23 CITY OF TORONTO
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 201, 202, 219, Plan 2226 -Y,
Part Lot 1, Plan RANGE 5, in the City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council
Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of
Toronto.
The purpose is to construct a multi -use recreational pathway (for walking, running and biking)
along the west side of the Humber River to serve as a connection for the Lakeshore Park to the
North Humber River Park via the connection of the Tommy Thompson and the Martin
Goodman trails, involving some minor infilling under the Canadian National Railway bridge,
along the west abutment, and an infilling of approximately 245 sq. metres of clean fill along the
612
west embankment, located immediately north of the CNR bridge, in order to route the trail
around the northwest bridge abutment and the existing headwall structure.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004.
• Letter to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, dated May 23, 2002,
prepared by Acres International outlining the proposed trail project, date received
September 23, 2002.
• Humber Bridges Site Restoration and Recreational Pathways, Plan and Details, Dwg.
No. A01 -01, revision date September 26, 2002, and Typical Sections and Details,
Dwg. No. S- 757 -65, revision date September 26, 2002, all prepared by Acres
International, date received October 1, 2002.
• Index Drawing, Dwg. No. S- 757 -51, dated April 29, 2002, and Northwest Pathway
Extension to Tommy Thompson Trail Plan, Dwg. No. S- 757 -60, dated April 29, 2002, all
prepared by Acres International, date received September 23, 2002.
• Schedule 'A', Information For Tenderers, and Schedule 'B', Special Specifications,
prepared by Acres International, Contract 02FS -30S, date received September 23,
2002.
• Letter to Acres International, dated March 20, 2002, prepared by The Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority outlining two options to undertake a fish habitat
compensation project.
• Humber River Pike Spawning Habitat, Proposed Contours and Habitat Areas,
prepared by TRCA, date received September 30, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a multi -use recreational pathway (for walking, running and biking)
along the west side of the Humber River to serve as a connection from the Lakeshore Park
north to the North Humber River Park and connecting the Tommy Thompson and the Martin
Goodman trails. The proposed works will involving some minor infilling under the Canadian
National Railway bridge, with the placement of fill material along the west bridge abutment
within the confines of the existing pilings and the existing footprint. Rock rip rap will be placed
along the river bottom at the outer edge to provide support, while granular material will be
placed on top of the existing platform to raise the pathway such that it is elevated above the
100 Year flood level. A geoweb retaining wall will be constructed along the outer edge of the
trail platform and the surface of the 4.0 metre wide platform will be covered with asphalt and a
handrail installed along the outside edge of the path for safety purposes. The project also
involves an infilling of approximately 245 sq. metres of clean fill along the western embankment
of the Humber River, located immediately north of the CNR bridge, in order to route the trail
around the bridge abutment and the existing headwall structure.
Control of Flooding:
Authority engineering staff have reviewed the trail design and are satisfied that the proposed
works will not significantly affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters. In addition, the
trail under the bridge will be raised such that it will be elevated above the 100 Year flood level.
613
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented and maintained to ensure that
construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed infilling of the river channel will involve a HADD (harmful alteration, disruption or
destruction of fish habitat) and requires authorization from the Department of Fisheries and
Oceans. In this regard, Authority staff have proposed a fisheries compensation package
involving the creation of pike spawning habitat in the vicinity of the South Humber Park,
approximately 500 metres upstream of the proposed fill area which will result in a net gain in
fish habitat. The City of Toronto has requested that Authority staff undertake this fish habitat
creation project on their behalf, with financial renumeration being granted to the TRCA for the
work. Authority staff are satisfied with the project and the creation of new fish habitat, however
approval from DFO and the Ministry of Natural Resources is still pending The Coast Guard has
indicated that they have no navigational objections to the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.1.2 - New Resource -based Uses - and Section 5.4 -
Corridor Rehabilitation Projects - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
CFN: 33533
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 23, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (MIDTOWN COMMUNITY)
Application #: 371/02/TOR
8.1.24 HOWARD KERBEL
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 47, Plan 4831, (8 Brian Cliff Drive), in the
City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Howard Kerbel.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a 90 square meter addition to the rear of an existing single family
dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004.
• Letter of Intent, prepared by Designers Collaborative, dated October 2, 2002, received
October 2, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
614
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River, in order
to facilitate the construction of a 90 square meter living space addition to the rear of an existing
single family dwelling.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with the
Don River. The storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
Sediment/erosion control methods (silt fence) will be installed and maintained during the
construction process to prevent sediment and debris from reaching the river. No
sedimentation of the watercourse will occur as a result of the proposed works. All excavated fill
material will be removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on tableland a distance of 10 meters from the top of
bank, and 28 meters (92 feet) from the watercourse. A geotechnical report has confirmed that
there are no slope stability concerns associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 33052
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: AprlI 2, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 121/02/TOR
8.1.25 CITY OF TORONTO
To construct in a flood plain on Block G, Plan M1271, (223 Jane Street), in the City
of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated and Floodplain Area of the
Humber River (Black Creek), in order to facilitate the construction of a recreational splash pad
and associated wetland outfall.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004.
• Letter of Intent to Design to the Requirements of the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority, prepared by Wendy Shearer Landscape Architect, dated
October 2, 2002, received October 2, 2002.
615
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated and Floodplain Area of the
Humber River (Black Creek), in order to facilitate the construction of a new 375 square meter
children's recreational splash pad area. The splash pad outfall area will be naturalized with
native plantings, and will meander 15 meters to the Black Creek. There will be minimal flows
from this play structure, with the majority of expected to percolate into the ground before
reaching the existing watercourse. There will be no disturbance within 5 meters of the existing
watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works will involve grading in the area of the proposed splash pad in order to
create a low play area, and a berm which will provide protection from wind. There will be no
importation of fill into the area. The storage capacity of the floodplain will not be reduced, the
storage and conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on flat land a distance of 50 meters (164 feet) from
the watercourse. No sedimentation of the watercourse will occur as a result of the proposed
works. All excavated fill material will be removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are to be undertaken on land which has been historically filled and
graded in the construction of the existing parkland. No trees will be removed as a result of this
project. There are no significant resource features on site, and no slope
stability /fisheries /geotechnical concerns associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.1.2. - New Resource -based Uses - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33488
Report Prepared by: Amy Maurer, extension 5360
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 13, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 353/02/TOR
8.1.26 COSIMO OPPEDISANO
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, Concession 10 Lot 10, Plan M89, (167
Ranch Trail), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Cosimo Oppedisano.
The purpose is to remove material from and re -grade a grassed swale in the Fill Regulated
Area of the Humber River.
616
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004.
• Letter of undertaking from the City of Vaughan dated October 2, 2002 addressing
restoration concerns and work plan.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating road granular material from a grassed swale and culvert
crossing. The swale will be re- graded and restored after the excavation is complete. The
swale is within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River. The works are required to prevent
nuisance flooding on a property adjacent to the culvert.
Control of Flooding:
The proposal is to remove granular material that has gathered in the channel as a result of
works completed by the City of Vaughan. As the proposed works are to restore the swale to
original grade, there is no aggravation of flooding.
Pollution:
The works will be completed in dry conditions and restoration works will be completed
immediately. No pollution of downstream watercourses is expected.
Conservation of Land:
The swale flows intermittently. There are no concerns with the Department of Fisheries and
Oceans if the works are done during dry conditions. As the works will take less than 1 day to
be completed and restored, conservation of land issues have been adequately addressed.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
CFN: 33384
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: July 23, 2002
Application #: 296 /02/VAUG
8.1.27 METRUS PROPERTIES LIMITED
To place fill within a regulated area on Part 10 Lot 2, Plan M -1801, (45 Connie
Crescent), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Metrus Properties Limited.
The purpose is to conduct grading works to facilitate the construction of an industrial building
and associated parking area.
617
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004.
• Drawing No. A -1.0, Site Plan, date received July 30, 2002, prepared by A. Baldassarra
Architect Inc.
• Drawing No. G -1, Site Grading and Servicing Plan, date received September 20, 2002,
prepared by V.A. Pisclone & Associates Inc.
• Sheet No. L -1, Landscape Plan, date received September 23, 2002, prepared by
Alexander Budrevics Associates Ltd.
• Sheet No. L -2, Landscape Details, date received September 23, 2002 prepared by
Alexander Budrevics Associates Ltd.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to conduct grading works in order to construct an industrial building and
associated parking area, in an existing, fully built -out, industrial subdivision known as Langstaff
Business Park. The proposal was accepted by TRCA staff through site plan review, as
required by the City of Vaughan's Engineering Department. The development will be
sufficiently setback from the stable top of bank of the West Don River valley. The stability of the
bank was confirmed by a geotechnical study prepared by the applicant and accepted by TRCA
staff. The servicing, grading and stormwater management schemes for the site were also
accepted by staff, as they are consistent with Authority requirements.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the West Don
River, and therefore impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters will not result.
Pollution:
A sediment control fence and catch basin sediment controls will be in place for the duration of
construction, in order to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley lands and
watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no outstanding geotechnical issues associated with the proposal, and there are no
fisheries issues related to the proposal. No significant, natural resource features will be
affected by the proposed works. The buffer adjacent to the top of bank will be planted with
native, woody and herbacious species at densities that are in accordance with Authority
planting guidelines.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 - Development & Redevelopment/Intensification
Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
618
CFN: 33337
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: June 27, 2002
TOWN OF CALEDON
Application #: 259 /02/VAUG
8.1.28 ORAZIO PAGANO /ARLINGTON HOMES
To alter a waterway on Lot 23, Concession 4 EHS, in the Town of Caledon, Humber
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Orazio Pagano /Arlington
Homes.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse in order to construct a stormwater outfall to the Humber
River in order to facilitate the development of a registered rural estate plan of subdivision in the
Town of Caledon.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2007 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Letter of Undertaking to perform all works to the satisfaction of the TRCA, prepared
by Orazio Pagano /Arlington Homes, dated October 1, 2002, received by TRCA
October 2, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is a 21 ha parcel of land located on the west side of St. Andrews Road,
north of the 20th Sideroad in the Town of Caledon. The southwest portion of the property is
traversed by a watercourse and contains the Caledon Creek Complex wetland. In July 1990,
the TRCA issued Permit No. C -90119 to Mazzoca & Sons Ltd. to construct an outfall in order to
facilitate the development of a 12 lot rural estate plan of subdivision (21 T- 87019C) on the
subject property. The outfall conforms to a stormwater management report approved by TRCA
for the subdivision. The stormwater outfall is located in area that is designated for Fill Line
Extension by the TRCA. While the plan of subdivision was registered in March 1991
(43M- 1009), the property was never developed with the exception of the road layout. The
property was recently purchased by the applicant, who is now proceeding with the
development. As a result, an application has been made to construct the outfall as per the
TRCA permit issued in 1990. In light of the intervening years since the original approval and
having regard for previous TRCA approvals through the subdivision review and Regulation
process, TRCA staff have requested the applicant to update the original design and
incorporate stormwater quality control measures consistent with current TRCA criteria.
619
Control of Flooding:
Authority engineering staff are satisfied that there will be no adverse impact to the control of
flooding from the proposed works.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion controls are to be implemented and maintained throughout the duration
of construction.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will be located outside the limits of the Caledon Creek Complex wetland,
as determined through the original subdivision approval process. A vegetation restoration plan
will be required to ensure all disturbed areas associated with the proposed works will be
revegetated /stabilized following construction. There are no geotechnical issues associated
with the development area.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33548
Report Prepared by: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281
For information contact: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281
Date: September 24, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 372/02/CAL
8.1.29 AVIGNON INC.
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 1, Concession 2 ,
(7095 Bayview Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located
on the property owned by Avignon Inc..
The purpose is to conduct grading works and to construct a stormwater outfall, in order to
facilitate the development of a multi -unit condominium apartment building and associated
surface and underground parking areas.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2007.
• Drawing SP, Site Servicing Grading and Stormwater Management, date received
September 23, 2002, prepared by A.J. Underhill.
• Drawing R -1, Slope Restoration Plan, date received September 23, 2002, prepared by
David McWhirter.
• Drawing L -3, North Property and Slope Planting Plan, date received September 23,
2002, prepared by David McWhirter.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
620
Proposal:
The proposal is to conduct grading works and to construct a stormwater outfall on the East
Don River, in order to develop a 6- storey, 93 -unit condominium apartment building and
associated surface and underground parking areas. The site plan for the subject property was
accepted by TRCA staff through site plan circulation by the Town of Markham. The
development will be sufficiently set back from the stable top of bank. The stability of the bank
was confirmed by a geotechnical study prepared by the applicant and accepted by TRCA staff.
The site servicing, grading and stormwater management schemes for the site were also
accepted by staff, as they are consistent with Authority requirements.
Control of Flooding:
Only the proposed outfall will be situated within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The design of
the outfall will not result in negative impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion controls will be installed and maintained for the duration of construction
in order to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valleylands and watercourse. As there
will be no instream works associated with the project, staff determined that an authorization
from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans was not required. The applicant will be provided
with a Letter of Advice upon permit issuance, which will outline mitigative measures for
protecting fish habitat.
Conservation of Land:
There are no outstanding geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the project and no
significant natural heritage features will be affected by the project. The outfall channel will be
installed by tunneling in order to minimize disturbance to natural heritage features. The buffer
adjacent to the top of bank will be planted with native, woody and herbacious species at
densities that are in accordance with Authority planting guidelines.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 - Development & Redevelopment/Intensification
Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas, and Section 4.3 - Infrastructure
and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33467
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: August 29, 2002
CITY OF PICKERING
Application #: 338 /02 /MARK
8.1.30 PICKERING HARBOUR COMPANY
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 34, Plan 40R -5947, (Foot of
Liverpool Road), in the City of Pickering, Waterfront Watershed as located on the
property owned by Pickering Harbour Company.
621
The purpose is to grade within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain in order
to facilitate the redevelopment of the existing industrial site for marina purposes.
The permit will be issued for the period of October 4, 2002 to October 3, 2004 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Pickering Harbour Company, Site Servicing Details Drawing Nos SS2, SG2 and PR1
prepared by Sabourin Kimble and Associates as received on October 3rd, 2002.
• Pickering Harbour Company, Buffer, Wetland and Site Rehabilitation Plan, prepared
by Don Naylor and Associates as received on October 3rd, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to regrade the subject property at the foot of Liverpool Road (east
side) to facilitate the development of a marina facility. The lands are partially within the
Regional Storm Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area for the Krosnos Creek and Frenchman's
Bay. The lands which were historically created by filling, are adjacent to a Provincially
Significant Wetland to the east and the Krosnos Creek to the south. The lands were previously
used as a sewage treatment plant and subsequently as a fish hatchery. The new proposal will
involve utilizing the existing buildings on site for marina related uses and the existing gravel
areas for boat storage. A cut and fill balance is proposed to remove the existing developed
lands from the Regional Storm Floodplain and to establish a new naturalized edge for the
adjacent Provincially Significant Wetland (Hydro Marsh) and Krosnos Creek. The naturalized
edge is in excess of 15 metres from the current wetland boundary and should significantly
improve the adjacent marsh conditions.
This application has been the subject of an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to which the
TRCA and the Town of Pickering were a party. The plans being approved as part of this
application implement the decision of the Ontario Municipal Board and are satisfactory to
TRCA staff. A second phase to this proposal will result in the construction of a residential
development on the west side of Liverpool Road adjacent to Frenchman's Bay and will be the
subject of a future permit application to the TRCA.
Control of Flooding:
The lands being redeveloped for boat storage are partially within the Regional Storm
Floodplain. The cut and fill balance will remove the boat storage areas and useable portions of
the property from the Regional Storm Floodplain and a new flood plain line will be established
which will be contiguous with the natural areas to be created adjacent to the Provincially
Significant Wetland and Krosnos Creek. Therefore there will be an improvement to the control
of flooding on the subject lands.
622
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be erected in accordance with details provided by the applicant.
Furthermore, the works will be conducted in accordance with an approved schedule to reduce
impacts to the adjacent wetland. The existing storm drainage scheme is being retrofitted to
include stormsceptors, to improve water quality conditions. Boat storage will be contained
within a gravel based compound in accordance with TRCA requirements. Finally boat repair
will be restricted to containment areas prescribed through the Ontario Municipal Board
process.
Conservation of Land:
The edge of the adjacent Provincially Significant Wetland will be restored in accordance with
detailed plans submitted by the applicant. This will improve the site conditions and result in an
increased naturalized buffer. Native Plant species will be utilized in the restoration of the edge
to the satisfaction of TRCA staff.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.1. Development Within Established Communities,
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor management Program. The works constitute a
Harmful Alteration Disruption and Destruction HADD and as a result is subject to Department of
Fisheries and Oceans approval. The applicant has provided a letter of intent to DFO which is
currently under review.
CFN: 33376
Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: July 16, 2002
Application #: 289 /02 /PICK
RES. #B125/02 - RURAL WATER QUALITY MODELLING STUDY
Agreement with Beak International Incorporated to conduct water quality
modelling in TRCA's rural watersheds using the Agricultural Non -point
Source (AGNPS) model.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Blase
THAT the Authority enter into an Agreement with Beak International Incorporated to
participate in Beak's federally funded research program on the AGNPS model by
providing data and mapping for TRCA's rural watersheds;
AND FURTHER THAT the Authority retain the services of Beak International Incorporated
at an upset limit of $23,100 plus GST to complete deliverables associated with Phase I of
TRCA's Rural Water Quality Modelling Study.
CARRIED
623
BACKGROUND
Managing rural water quality forms an important part of the TRCA's overall watershed water
quality management objectives, and is particularly noted in TRCA's Watershed Management
Strategies, and the Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan. The TRCA is in the process of
developing a subwatershed plan for Centreville Creek, and has proposed the update of
watershed plans for the Rouge and Humber Rivers, all of which have significant areas under
rural land use. Over the next 2 years, the rural water quality component of these plans will
require modelling and analytical support to identify priority contaminant source areas and
appropriate remedial actions. The Rural Clean Water Program is TRCA's delivery mechanism
for implementing rural Best Management Practices (BMPs) at a farm scale, and there is a need
to develop a work program of cost effective priority projects to guide that program.
Requirements for rural water quality management have been addressed in several recent
provincial initiatives, including the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act, the Nutrient
Management Act, and the Walkerton Inquiry recommendations for watershed -based source
protection plans. The TRCA can assist in fulfilling obligations stemming from these initiatives
by developing decision making tools that private landowners, municipalities and agricultural
improvement associations could employ to identify non -point pollution sources and select cost
effective strategies for implementing Best Management Practices. Watershed -based rural
water quality management plans will assist in identifying key issues and watershed
management objectives, which can help define the scope of site scale work, such as the
preparation of environmental farm plans.
The objectives of the Rural Water Quality Modelling Study are as follows:
• Evaluate the relative impact of different land use scenarios and Best Management Practices
on water quality and determine the optimum strategies for addressing rural and urban non
point source pollution on watershed and subwatershed scales. These strategies will serve
as input to the development of watershed and subwatershed plans and complement the
City of Toronto's urban focused Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan by
addressing rural pollutant loadings from municipalities upstream of the City.
• Contribute to water supply source protection initiatives for surface water bodies by
identifying effective strategies for reducing sediment/nutrient loadings to the Lake Ontario
near -shore environment.
• Provide a tool for farmers, municipalities and the TRCA to fulfill obligations under the
Nutrient Management Act.
• Identify priority projects under the Rural Clean Water Program.
• Assess the usefulness of the AGNPS model as a tool in rural water quality management
and provide recommendations for improvements to the model.
• Strengthen and develop in house expertise in the use of the AGNPS model.
624
Application of the Agricultural Non -Point Source (AGNPS) model in several U.S. watersheds,
and more recently in the Duffins and Carruthers Creek watersheds in the Toronto region, has
shown the model to be a useful tool in evaluating the relative impact of different land cover
scenarios and Best Management Practices (BMPs) on surface runoff, sediment, and nutrient
transport (nitrogen and phosphorus) at the watershed and subwatershed scales. The model
considers a wide range of factors affecting water quality, including soils, land slope, nutrient
and sediment loading, local hydrology, land use practices, precipitation, drainage, erosion and
existing water quality.
The modeling component of this work requires a considerable investment of time to set -up,
calibrate, validate, run and document results at the watershed and subwatershed scales.
Sufficient TRCA staff time is not currently available for setting up and running the model,
therefore there is a need for hiring external services. TRCA staff have identified a way to retain
these services at a significantly reduced rate in conjunction with an opportunity to participate in
a federally- funded research program, by entering into an Agreement with Beak International.
RATIONALE
Beak International has been actively involved in providing expertise in rural watershed
management since the 1980's through Agriculture Canada's SWEEP program, the provincial
CURB programs and Remedial Action Plans such as the Bay of Quinte. Currently Beak is
researching the application of the event -based AGNPS model as a tool for rural point and
non -point source pollution identification and mitigation through an National Science and
Engineering Research Council (NSERC) industrial post doctoral grant. Through this program,
Beak is able to offer professional consulting services for modelling rural pollution problems at a
substantially reduced cost in return for collaborating with TRCA on its rural watershed
management program. Also, in return for TRCA's collaboration in the research program, Beak
will provide TRCA with a copy of their NSERC Report and enhanced AGNPS model.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
A detailed Terms of Reference has been prepared to guide this work. The work is divided into
two phases: Phase I (October 2002 — March 2003); and Phase II (April 2003 — December
2003). Phase I deliverables include:
1. Set -up and calibration reports for the Humber and Rouge watersheds under existing land
use, including detailed modeling of the Centreville Creek subwatershed, and comparison of
AGNPS model results with those of earlier studies, including the City of Toronto's HSPF
model, and the Clean -Up of Rural Beaches (CURB) modeling performed in Centreville
Creek.
2. Reesor Creek scenario evaluation report, including analysis and interpretation of at least 4
different BMP and /or alternative land cover scenarios.
3. Soft copies of model input files for Humber and Rouge River watersheds, and the Centreville
Creek and Reesor Creek subwatersheds, with written documentation of steps taken in
setting -up, calibrating and running the model for these areas.
4. Up to two days of staff training on model set -up and calibration.
625
Phase H deliverables include:
1. Model set -up and calibration report for Etobicoke Creek watershed.
2. Scenario evaluation reports for each of the Humber and Rouge River watersheds, including
a comparison of the AGNPS and HSPF model results in the Rouge, documentation and
interpretation of model set -up and scenario evaluations for the East Humber subwatershed,
and a write -up and analysis of scenario evaluations in the Centreville Creek subwatershed.
3. Soft copies of model input files for the Etobicoke Creek watershed, and the Centreville
Creek and East Humber subwatersheds, with written documentation of steps taken in
setting -up, calibrating and running the model for these areas.
4. Two -day staff training on final model set -up, calibration and scenario evaluation (to be
provided in November or December, 2003).
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Out of a total Phase I project budget of $60,600, an upset limit of $23,100 has been established
to cover the costs associated with services and deliverables to be provided by Beak
International Inc. in Phase I. Beak in turn is providing approximately $28,000 value as in -kind
services. A budget of approximately $78,000 is anticipated for Phase II, with approximately
$40,000 of that to cover services that Beak will provide over and above that expected under the
research partnership.
Funding to support Phase 1 is provided in an approved grant from the Great Lakes
Sustainability Fund and the Authority's capital work program budget for rural water quality
management for the Region of Peel. Funding for Phase 2 is proposed in the Authority's
Regional capital budgets and the Great Lakes Sustainability Fund. Staff will report back to the
Executive for authorization to proceed with Phase II, contingent upon successful completion of
Phase I and funding availability.
Report prepared by: Tim Van Seters, extension 5337
For Information contact: Tim Van Seters, extension 5337; Sonya Meek extension 5253;
Patricia Lowe extension 5365
Date: September 26, 2002
RES.#B126/02 - RETENTION OF SERVICES - BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Hiring of biological /statistical consultant
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
626
THAT Dr. Bruce Kilgour be hired by the Authority for an upset amount of $25,000.00 plus
taxes to provide expert analysis and scientific support to staff who are involved in the
Regional Reference Sites project.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
There are numerous challenges in the effective management of Great Lakes watersheds
including land use change, fisheries, groundwater or water quality issues. Many managers
are now attempting to take a holistic view of the watershed in developing broad, basin -wide
objectives. One of the common objectives of these projects is to evaluate the current status of
a watershed and then set goals, objectives and targets for the future. There are two major
challenges to successfully accomplishing this task. Firs of all, it is difficult to determine
whether the aquatic component of a watershed is currently at its expected state within the
historic and surrounding geographic context. Secondly, it is difficult to predict the changes
that might occur in the current or targeted aquatic communities as a result of land use change.
These challenges are significant obstacles in the effective management of fish habitat, fish
communities and riverine aquatic systems in general.
The use of reference sites is an approach the TRCA has been developing through its fisheries
management plans for a number of years. By using historical and current biological
information, a general assessment of how the aquatic system in a watershed functioned
historically has been developed for most the watersheds within the Authority's jurisdiction.
However, the data set that the TRCA has used is fairly small, contains a relatively high
percentage of degraded stations and does not allow for the prediction of impacts from land
use change.
The Regional Reference Sites Project provides the opportunity to further develop and refine the
reference site approach by extending the spatial extent of sampling stations along the north
shore of Lake Ontario and incorporating many less impacted stations into the data set. The
principle outcome of this project will be models that determine the biophysical condition of a
stream relative to expected (reference) conditions, and to develop models that predict the
impact of future land use change on biophysical properties of streams. Relationships between
landscape variables, in- stream habitat, and fish and benthic community composition will be
established using a variety of statistical techniques. Although the geographical context of this
project are the streams flowing from the Oak Ridges Moraine to Lake Ontario, the resulting
models are expected to have application in other areas.
Using statistical analysis, physical and biological data will be summarized. Based on
developed models, deviations from the expected condition will be estimated for each biological
and habitat attribute for each test site. Test sites that fall inside the typical range of variability for
reference sites will be considered unimpaired, while those that fall outside of the normal range
of variability will be considered impaired.
The reference - condition models will be used to identify those landscape features that influence
biological condition. It is anticipated that criteria for classifying streams into functionally similar
types will become evident from the developed models.
627
Partners in this project include the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Toronto RAP,
the City of Toronto, the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, the Ganaraska River
Conservation Authority, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Environment Canada and the
Federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
Dr. Bruce Kilgour, who is currently employed by Jacques Whitford Environment Ltd., a
consulting firm based in Ottawa, has also been involved in developing this project. Dr. Kilgour
has previously analyzed and summarized benthic invertebrate data for the Authority and has
been involved with the reference site approach in the Ottawa - Carleton area.
The project partners feel that Dr. Kilgour has the experience to perform the statistical analysis
and summary of the data for this project and wish to retain him for these tasks.
Each of the data analysis tasks will be overseen and reviewed by the Regional Reference Sites
Project Group before approval to proceed is given. It is anticipated that the initial statistical
analysis and summary will be completed by the end of 2002.
RATIONALE
Dr. Bruce W. Kilgour, Ph. D., Aquatic Biology. is a Senior Consultant in the Environmental
Sciences Division of Jacques Whitford Environment Limited (JWEL), Ottawa. Dr. Kilgour has
16 years of experience in aquatic environmental assessment including environmental effects
monitoring, risk assessments, and faunal inventories. He has worked with pulp and paper and
mining companies, examined the effects of hydroelectric power generation, highway
construction, residential development, municipal wastewater and landfills on aquatic biota. His
areas of expertise in aquatic environmental monitoring include study design and statistics, and
benthic and fish community assessments. He has written several guidance documents for
sampling and reporting aquatic environment assessment data for provincial and federal
agencies. He teaches methods for monitoring aquatic environments with the Ontario Ministry
of Natural Resources.
Dr. Kilgour's familiarity is probably greatest with aquatic environments in southern Ontario
including areas within the bounds of the Grand River, Credit Valley, Toronto and Region and
Halton Region Conservation Authorities, and the Regional Municipality of Ottawa - Carleton (City
of Ottawa). In these areas he has conducted subwatershed studies, general aquatic
inventories, impact assessments, environmental effects monitoring programs, risk
assessments, and developed environmental monitoring programs.
Dr. Kilgour has been active in the development and application of the "Reference- Condition
Approach" (RCA) for assessing the condition of aquatic resources. The RCA is a general
approach for predicting the biotic and abiotic makeup of a site on the basis of landscape
information. The predicted condition is compared with what is actually there. Where there is
significant deviation of the actual from the predicted condition, an impact is assumed to have
occurred. As part of his post - doctoral research with Environment Canada, he explored the
performance of a variety of statistical techniques for developing reference - condition models
and for detecting impairment in communities of fish and benthic macroinvertebrates. As a
research associate at the University of Waterloo, he carried out a program that developed
reference - condition models for stream fish, invertebrates and habitat in the Moose River Basin.
In that study, Dr. Kilgour managed the collection of biotic and abiotic data from over 100
628
reference locations in the basin. The raw data were used to develop mathematical models
(equations) that predicted the types of habitat, and fish and invertebrate communities that one
might find at a site, based on landscape information (e.g., catchment size, surficial geology).
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available to complete this project in account code 115 -22.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONEWork to be completed includes finalizing the existing
baseline data to be used in the analysis, and then the data analysis, summary and model
predictions.
Report prepared by: Jon Clayton, extension 5353
For Information contact: Jon Clayton, extension 5353
Date: September 23, 2002
RES. #8127/02 - CONTRACT WITH RETIRING BCPV STAFF
Approval to hire on contract retiring BCPV Supervisor of Interpretation,
Education and Special Events for up to 3 months to successfully
conclude the 2002 season.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THAT approval be given for staff to enter into a contract with Shirley Allen, Surpervisor of
Interpretation, Education and Special Events at Black Creek Pioneer Village following her
retirement on October 31, 2002, to continue her employment with TRCA for up to 3
months to ensure successful completion of the Black Creek Pioneer Village 2002
program season.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Shirley Allen officially retires October 31, 2002. Recruitment for her position is currently
underway with interviews planned for early November and to have a successor in place no
later than January 2, 2003.
As Supervisor of Interpretation, Education, and Special Events, Shirley Allen is responsible for
the delivery of all public program components of Black Creek operations, including supervision
of 70 staff (all costumed interpreters and artisans, education assistants, livestock and
gardening staff)
629
The timing of her retirement is 8 weeks before the end of the 2002 season. This 8 week period
(Christmas season) is the busiest, most challenging 8 weeks of the year with an anticipated
sold out school program of 15,000 school visitors, 3 Christmas by Lamplight evenings, and
numerous corporate evening and weekend special events, staff performance reviews, and
preparation for layoff of all seasonal staff. Due to the nature of this senior job position and the
peak Christmas season demands, it is felt that continuity through to year end with successor
transition in January when BCPV is closed would be in the best interest of BCPV.
We would recommend that Shirley Allen be hired on contract at her current rate of pay for up to
3 months to ensure smooth conclusion of the Christmas season, and to provide adequate
guidance to her successor at the start of 2003.
Funds have been allocated in the BCPV budget to cover this cost.
Report prepared by: Marty Brent, extension 5403
For Information contact: Marty Brent, extension 5403
Date: September 25, 2002
RES. #B128/02 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY REVIEW AND STRATEGY
DEVELOPMENT
Approval to Award Contract. Request for approval to award a contract
for the TRCA Information Technology Review and Strategy Development
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THAT because time is of the essence in completing the TRCA Information Technology
Review and Strategy Development prior to year end, approval be given for the Chief
Administrative Officer and the Director, Finance and Business Development, to award a
contract not to exceed $60,000 (plus applicable taxes) to one of four short list companies
which as a result of references and final review of the proposals submitted, best meets
the Authority's needs and specifications.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority has requested proposals from 17 companies with demonstrated ability to
conduct an information technology review and strategy development for the TRCA. These
companies were chosen because of prior work for the TRCA or its municipal partners,
demonstrated experience and expertise in the field and prior interest in doing work for TRCA.
Copies of the Request for Proposal and the list of companies to whom it was sent will be
available at the Executive Committee meeting on October 4th.
630
RATIONALE
The Authority's information technology needs have continued to grow along with the Living
City programs and other activities that rely on database technology and support systems such
as GIS. Staff has managed the growth on an ad hoc basis with available staff. In 2002, staff
provided in the budget and as part of the business plan for corporate services for the hiring of
an outside adviser to review the information technology needs and assist staff in developing a
strategy for future growth and development.
A steering committee has been created with staff representatives from the various sections
most effected by information technology. This group has guided the preparation of the request
for proposals (RFP)
As noted above, an RFP was sent out in September. Eleven companies have responded:
DeVries Technical Services Inc.
IT Net Consultants
Telus Business Solutions
Xwave
Amsdell Inc.
SBR International Inc.
Totaluptime
Deloitte & Touche
Insite Computer Group
Sage
Quality performance Associates
$45,000
100,000 + /-
60,000
48,500
24,180
110,000 + /-
38,000
60,000
28,000
73,000 + expenses
60,000
Of the eleven, the IT Steering Committee has narrowed the selection to four which were best
able to demonstrate the expertise, knowledge, and understanding of the Authority's needs.
Several bids were lower in price but have not indicated sufficient capability to undertake the
assignment. Additional information has been requested from the following four firms to
enable the staff to make a final selection:
Devries Technical Services Inc.
Deloitte & Touche
Quality Performance Associates
Telus Business Solutions
Time is of the essence to have the work completed before year end. Staff is seeking Executive
Committee approval for the Chief Administrative Officer aand the Director, Finance and
Business Development to choose from the short list of four the firm that is best able to meet the
Authority's needs and specifications.
631
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Staff had provide for this project as part of the information technology budget. It was expected
that up to $50,000 would be needed. The final selection may be as high as $60,000. The
additional $10,000 can be accommodated in the budget.
Report prepared by: Jim Dillane, extension 6292
For Information contact: Jim Dillane, extension 6292
Date: October 02, 2002
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:13 a.m., on October 4, 2002.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
632
THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/02
November 1, 2002
The Executive Committee Meeting #10/02, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek
Pioneer Village, on Friday, November 1, 2002. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting
to order at 10:40 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Member
Lorna Bissell Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Ron Moeser Member
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
RES.#B129/02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #9/02, held on October 4, 2002, be approved.
CARRIED
DELEGATIONS
(a) Larry Garber, President and Rosemary Humphries, Director of the York Children's Aid
Society informing the Executive Committee of the assistance received by Kortright staff
during a day camp held at Kortright this past summer.
(b) Cam Milani, speaking in regards to item 7.5 - Rizmi Holdings Limited Aggregate
Application and Ontario Municipal Board Appeals.
RES. #B130 /02 - DELEGATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Maria Augimeri
THAT above -noted delegation (a) be heard and received;
633
AND FURTHER THAT a letter be sent from the Chair to the Kortright staff in appreciation
of their assistance with the York Children's Aid Society day camp and to notify the staff of
the deputation by the York Children's Aid Society;
AND FURTHER THAT an additional letter be sent from the Chair to Kortright staff in
appreciation of their work in outdoor education throughout York Region.
RES.#B131/02 - DELEGATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Blase
Ron Moeser
CARRIED
THAT above -noted delegation (b) be added to the agenda and heard and received;
CARRIED
CORRESPONDENCE
(a)
An email dated October 30, 2002, from Madeline McDowell, Chair, Humber Heritage
Committee, in regards to Boyd Conservation Area.
RES.#B132/02 - CORRESPONDENCE
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Maria Augimeri
Irene Jones
THAT above -noted correspondence (a) be referred to staff.
CARRIED
634
"Madeleine McDowell" <m.mcdowell @sympatico.ca> on 10/30/2002
04:13:03 PM
Please respond to "Madeleine McDowell" <m.mcdowell @sympatico.ca>
To: Kathy Stranks /MTRCA @MTRCA
cc:
Subject: Next Agenda ,please?
163 Humbercrest Blvd.,
Toronto, Ontario.
M6S 4L5
October 29th, 2002
Chairman Dick O'Brien,
Toronto region Conservation Authority,
5 Shoreham Drive,
Downsview.
Dear Chairman O'Brien:
The Humber Heritage Committee urges the Toronto Region Conservation Authority to maintain
the integrity of Boyd Park Conservation Area.
There is a traditional perception of park land and natural areas as being empty space.
This is particularly so when municipalities and their engineers are considering transportation
corridors. These areas are rarely perceived as a resource which is irreplaceable and a legacy for
the future of humanity.
The persistent encroachment of urban infrastructure and the stress which human proximity places
upon flora, fauna and water resources must be held in check.
We live in the remains of one of the richest natural environments on the planet.
These remnants must not only be protected and rejuvenated but also expanded to maintain their
viability in a growing human populace.
The Toss of the area to the east of Lake Wilcox to highway and development is the loss of a barely
viable eco system. It seriously compromises the eastern headwaters of the Humber as well as
headwaters of the Don and Rouge.
This must not be repeated.
Please do not permit any encroachment on Boyd Park Conservation Area.
Thank you for your kind attention.
Yours sincerely,
Madeleine McDowell
Chair, Humber Heritage Committee.
635
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #B133/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component/Don River Watershed
Wycliffe Elgin West Limited, CFN 33663. Purchase of property located
south of Gamble Side Road, east of Bathurst Street, Town of Richmond
Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the " Natural Heritage Lands
Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005" Flood Plain and
Conservation Component, Don River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.125 acres (0.051 hectares), more
or less, consisting of a triangular shaped parcel of vacant land, be purchased from
Wycliffe Elgin West Limited being Part of Lot 6, Registered Plan 4667, designated as
Block 29, on draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Rowan- Stanciu Ltd. under their
Project No. 20- 213A/GambleMPl, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York
located south of Gamble Side Road, east of Bathurst Street;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses Incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approving the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Don
River watershed.
636
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: October 18, 2002
Attachments: 1
637
Attachment 1
638
RES. #B134/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component/Rouge River Watershed
Donald A. Dawson and Joan Dawson, CFN 33666. Purchase of property
located south of Gamble Side Road, west of Yonge Street, Town of
Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the " Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005" Flood
Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.013 acres (0.41 hectares), more or
less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of vacant land, be purchased from Donald
A. Dawson and Joan Dawson being Part of Lot 23, Registered Plan 4667, designated as
Block 18, on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Bryan Thomas & Associates Inc.
under their drawing No. 275 -DP -1, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York
located south of Gamble Side Road, west of Yonge Street;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approving the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition for the
Rouge River watershed.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management.
639
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 or Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: October 21, 2002
Attachments:1
640
Attachment 1
NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS'PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION t, .
PROJECT, 2001 -2005 _)- \. \
FloodPlain andConaervation Component/Rouge River Watershed I 1 _ --
Donald.A. pals_on and"Joan Dawson �` `� °
CFN 391;16 ',1; 11 rte''
is NVE%�'O
T Cr
r am. .
y =�
4•' 1 (-
` - �K
t
v I �) v
_--- t-- - `� �
,
r --..
'7,- -- _ Jt�' - 's., .1
y
ELGII
-i
, , ...„ ._ -, \ t,;,„.„.„.. -
i a ter
• \' ; r}6. -� r� ervatr n 71CHMOND HILL
51
•
Zito
a `=
1•7 \
50202741,
TRCAtANDS
IMO SUBJECT PROPERTY
•
S•2
641
••.`
RES.#B135/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component/Rouge River Watershed
Baypark Investments Inc., CFN 33672. Purchase of property located on
the west side of Bayview Avenue, north of Elgin Mills Road, Town of
Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the " Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005" Flood
Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.593 acres (0.24 hectares), more or
less, consisting of an irregular shaped parcel of vacant land, be purchased from Baypark
Investments Inc. being Part of Lot 30, Registered Plan 2766, designated as Block B on a
draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Masongsong- Atkari Engineering Limited under
their Project No. DP -1, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York located on
the west side of Bayview Avenue, north of Elgin Mills Road;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approving the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge
River watershed.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management.
642
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 or Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: October 21, 2002
Attachments:1
■
643
Attachment 1
1E: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation
Baypark Investments Inc.
CFN 33872
PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
Component/Rouge River Watershed
•
•
5
•
Su
M
• a 9
•
O
cl
•
•
76$
O
tar
2 ter,
•..•.•••
• •••.• /•••�
'•� ••.•0•'•
•
644
, TRCA LANDS
_*BJECTPROPERTY
RES. #B136/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component/Rouge River Watershed
554056 Ontario Limited, CFN 33665. Purchase of property located east
of Neilson Road, south of Passmore Avenue, City of Toronto (East
Community), under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and
Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005" Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Rouge River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.398 acres (0.161 hectares), more
or Tess, consisting of two irregular shaped parcels of vacant land, be purchased from
554056 Ontario Limited, in the City of Toronto (East Community), being Part of Lots 13
and 14, Concession 4, designated as Blocks 270 and 272, on Plan 66M -2393, located east
of Neilson Road, south of Passmore Avenue;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, TRCA Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approving the Natural Heritage
Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owners solicitor, Gary E. Siskind of Owens, Wright
LLP.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge
River watershed.
645
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
This parcel of land will be turned over to the City of Toronto under the terms of the existing
management agreement.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004 -11 -502.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 or Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: October 18, 2002
Attachments: 1
646
Attachment 1
■
X60
7 6
r� • Aroma! f.
•
NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUJSITION 122= .TRCA LANDS
PROJECT, 20012005 SUBJECT PROPERTY
Flood Pain aocItediMervation Component/Rouge River Watershed
554056 OntarlO,limited r
CFN 33665
RE:
/61 5
4
59'
647
■60 9
RES.#B137/02 - RIZMI HOLDINGS LIMITED AGGREGATE APPLICATION AND
ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD APPEALS
Oak Ridges Moraine, Don River Watershed. Rizmi Holdings Limited and
Lucia Milani have appealed portions of the City of Vaughan OPA 600 as it
relates to environmental policies and designations including, but not
limited to, lands subject to an Aggregate Resource Extraction Application
(Part of Lot 30, Concession 2, City of Vaughan).
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Maria Augimeri
Jim McMaster
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be
directed to continue to object to any Rizmi Holdings or Lucia Milani applications that
include intrusions into, or impacts on, the McGiII Area ESA;
THAT staff be directed to represent the Authority with party status at the Ontario
Municipal Board hearing In the matter of Rizmi Holdings Limited and Lucia Milani's
objections to OPA 600, and to any subsequent consolidated hearings that may result
regarding these lands;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to retain legal services for representation on these
matters.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Rizmi Holdings Limited and Lucia Milani lands are located within the headwaters of the
Don River Watershed, on the Oak Ridges Moraine, and contain portions of the McGill area ESA
which is also a Life Science Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) as identified by the
Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR). The owner of these lands has historically extracted
aggregate (sand) from portions of the site and is currently pursuing an Aggregate License from
the MNR for further extraction, also on portion of the site. In light of the conflict between OPA
600 policies and schedules and the owners objectives for the site, she is appealing portions of
the plan; specifically, environmental designations.
Planning Matters
On September 26, 1997 the Authority adopted resolution #A205/97 as follows:
THAT staff be authorized to represent Authority interests before the Ontario Municipal
Board Hearing on the referrals related to the City of Vaughan Official Plan;
THAT the firm of Gardiner, Roberts be retained to provide legal representation for the
Authority at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing related to these planning applications;
AND FURTHER THAT staff continue to pursue the resolution of Authority issues in
cooperation with relevant parties and /or participants prior to the Hearing.
The appeals referred to in this resolution included an appeal by Lucia Milani for Rizmi Holdings
Limited to various environmental policies and designations in OPA 400 as they related to her
lands.
648
Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 600 is the new City of Vaughan Official Plan, successor to OPA
400, resulting from the 5 year review. Rizmi Holdings appeals to OPA 600 are comparable to
those made in 1995 to OPA 400 which were never addressed before the OMB.
Additionally, the City of Vaughan initiated a zoning by -law amendment for these lands to reflect
the environmental features on site. This application has also been referred to the OMB by the
land owner.
Aggregate Application
Concurrent with the planning appeals, Rizmi Holdings Limited has been pursuing a Extraction
License under the Aggregate Resources Act for, portions of the same lands. At Authority
Meeting #8/00, held September 29, 2000, the Authority passed resolution #A202/00 as
follows:
THAT the Ministry of Natural Resources and the applicant be advised that The Toronto &
Region Conservation Authority maintains it's objection to the application made by Rizmi
Holdings Limited under the Aggregate Resources Act, for the reasons set out in the staff
report related thereto;
AND FURTHER THAT the City of Vaughan, Region of York, Ministry of Municipal Affairs,
and the Ontario Municipal Board be so advised.
The Aggregate Resources Act application has been referred to the OMB by the Ministry of
Natural Resources due to significant outstanding objectors.
RATIONALE
The above noted previous positions taken by the Authority are based on the environmental
significance and sensitivity of the lands subject to these matters. Disturbance to this site could
result in loss of habitat cover, Toss of area sensitive and forest interior species, displacement of
regionally rare plant species and reduced connectivity.
In light of the above noted environmental significance of the site, and consistent with previous
positions taken by the Authority on both the Planning matters related to this site as well as the
Aggregate Extraction Application, staff is recommending that these positions be maintained,
with legal representation, in front of the Ontario Municipal Board on referrals to OPA 600, or
any consolidated hearing that arise as a result of the additional, above noted, referrals.
Report prepared by: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
For Information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: October 23, 2002
649
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES. #B138/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Ron Moeser
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.1 - 8.1.22, inclusive, and 8.1.29 - Cityscape Development Corp.), which are listed
below.
CARRIED
CITY OF PICKERING
8.1.1 CITY OF PICKERING
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area
on (1368 Rougemount Drive), in the City of Pickering, Petticoat Creek Watershed
as located on the property owned by Gi -Teak Hong.
The purpose is to undertake some streambank stabilization works along a tributary of Petticoat
Creek, upstream of Rougemount Drive, involving the removal of the existing concrete debris
and fill material along the eastern embankment and the reshaping of both embankments and
placement of planted fieldstone to alleviate an ongoing erosion problem.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Existing Conditions, Layout/Construction Staging Plan, Planting Plan, Sections, and
Details, Drawing Nos. L1, L2, L3, L4, & L5, all prepared by Schollen & Company Inc.,
revision date September 30, 2002, date received October 2, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
650
Proposal:
The site is located directly upstream of an existing outlet structure above Rougemount Drive
and has an ongoing erosion problem. Previous attempts by the landowner to prevent erosion,
involving some placement of concrete debris and earthen fill along the eastern embankment
has failed. The project will involve removing the existing debris and reshaping the
embankments to a more gentle slope, prior to installing planted fieldstone bank protection.
The existing one metre high gabion retaining wall, located directly upstream of the concrete
outlet structure and along the western embankment, will remain in place; while the eastern
embankment will be pulled back to align the channel with the outlet structure. This area
appears to have previously been filled in by the landowner in attempts to mitigate the erosion.
Four or five fieldstones will also be placed on the streambed to serve as a stepping stone
crossing. The project will be undertaken by the municipality on behalf of the landowner and
has been designed by Schollen & Company.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located partially within the Regional Storm floodplain, but entirely
outside of the low flow channel, with the exception of the stepping stone crossing. The
channel will be slightly widened upstream of the outlet structure, thus re- creating the original
stream alignment. Authority staff have reviewed the proposal and are satisfied that no adverse
effects to the storage or conveyance of flood waters will result.
Pollution:
Detailed sediment and erosion controls will be implemented to prevent sedimentation of the
watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will be done in the dry and will mitigate an ongoing erosion problem on
site, resulting in a marked improvement. Detailed planting and rehabilitation plans have been
prepared by Schollen & Company and found to be satisfactory.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 5.2 - Erosion Control and Slope Stability Remedial
Works - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33325
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: June 25, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (EAST YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 250 /02 /PICK
8.1.2 SILVA BIBERGERS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 73, Plan 2477, (31 Don Valley Drive),
in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Silva Bibergers.
651
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the
construction of a two storey addition and deck onto the rear of the existing residence.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Proposed Site Plan, Existing First Floor Plan and Second Floor Plan,
Existing Front Elevation, Existing Rear Elevation, Existing Right Elevation, Existing
Left Elevation, Proposed First & Second Floor Plan, Proposed Front Elevation A & B
and Rear Elevation, and Proposed Right Elevation and Left Elevation, Drawing Nos.
A1-A9, prepared by Cityscape Design Innovations Inc., dated August 2002, date
received August 29, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the
construction of a 2.29 m. by 3.81 m. one storey addition and an attached deck onto the rear of
the existing residence. The existing residence has a walk -out basement to the backyard, and
is located approximately 6 metres from the top of bank associated with the Don valley. The
proposed new addition will be constructed in the southwest corner of the house on caissons,
and will involve an extension of 0.6 metres beyond the rear wall of the house, being situated
within a L- shaped cutout area. The attached deck will be constructed at the first floor level and
will be built on caissons as well.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located entirely above the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the
conveyance and storage of flood waters will not be affected.
Pollution:
A sediment control fence will be installed between the top of bank and the proposed works in
order to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse, situated approximately 200 metres
distance.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed addition and deck will be located on the tableland portion of the lot, with the
addition maintaining the same 6 metre setback from the top of bank as the existing residence,
while the deck will be located approximately 2 metres from the stable top of bank. The
proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach and there are
no slope stability /geotechnical issues.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (C) - Minor Additions - and Section 4.2.2 (E) -
Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program.
652
CFN: 33473
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 4, 2002
Application #: 340/02/TOR
8.1.3 NANCY MCLEAN /SARAH EASTERBROOK
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 131, Plan D -135, (54 Saulter Street), in
the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Nancy McLean /Sarah Easterbrook.
The purpose is to construct a 2 Car Garage within the Lower Don Special Policy Area and
Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• New Framed Detached Garage for 54 Saulter St. prepared by Three Line Architectural
Designers dated August 2002 received by TRCA September 23, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a detached two car garage on a floating slab within the Lower Don
Special Policy Area. The proposed works does not involve placing of fill or excavating of
material and are within the established urban area. The Don River is more than 420 m from the
property.
Control of Flooding:
Grading works will not be required for the floating slab garage to achieve positive drainage
away from the structure. The control of flooding will not be affected by the proposed works.
Pollution:
There will be no sediment created as a result of this work and the work will not impact the
watercourse or surrounding land.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is located within a highly urbanized area surrounded by both commercial
and residential developments. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues evident at this
site. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 (C) - Existing Special Policy Areas- and Section
4.2.2(E)- Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authorities Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
653
CFN: 33562
Report Prepared by: David Lawrie, extension 5268
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 25, 2002
Application #: 374/02/TOR
8.1.4 CARLO MORRA
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 52, Plan 423, (69 Morse Street), in the
City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Carlo Morra.
The purpose is to construct a two storey addition with crawlspace onto the north side of the
existing residence within the Lower Don Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Additions and Renovations to 69 Morse Street, Toronto, North Wall Section, Basement
Plan, Ground Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan, West and East Elevations, and North and
South Elevations, Drawing Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, prepared by Keith Becker, dated
August 20, 2002, date received September 16, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the construction of a 3 m. by 8.5 m. two storey addition with crawlspace,
onto the north side of the existing residence, located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of
the Don River and within the Lower Don Special Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located within the floodfringe portion of the Regional Storm Floodplain of
the Don River and within the Lower Don Special Policy Area. The proposed addition will be
located outside of the hydraulic floodway and will be floodproofed to the 350 Year flood
elevation of the Don River. The proposed works are not expected to impact on the storage or
conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The subject property is located more than 400 metres from the Don River and the proposed
works are not expected to cause any sedimentation of any watercourse. All excess fill will be
removed from the site and the site stabilized and restored.
654
Conservation of Land:
The proposed addition is located more than 400 metres from the Don River and entirely within
the Lower Don Special Policy Area, a highly urbanized and industrial area. The proposed
works are not expected to impact on any significant resource features and are consistent with
existing development in the area. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated
with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33586
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 26, 2002
Application #: 375/02/TOR
8.1.5 REZA NASAB
To construct in a flood plain on (169 Logan Avenue), in the City of Toronto (East
York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Reza Nasab.
The purpose is to construct a 6 plex three storey residence within the Lower Don Special Policy
Area and Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Proposed 6 plex 3 Storey Building location 169 Logan Avenue Toronto, Ontario
prepared by ARCH -CADD Consultants dated August 25, 2002, dated received October
10, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to demolish an existing residence to facilitate the construction a six plex three
storey residence within the Lower Don Special Policy Area. The proposal falls within an
established urban area. The depths of flooding are .20 m and therefore the structure will be
floodproofed to the Regional Storm Flood Elevation.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed new residence has been designed to be flood proofed to the Regional Storm
Level and to withstand the flow velocities and depths of flooding. All openings are located
above the Regional Storms flooding depth of 20 cm.
655
Pollution:
There will be no sediment created as a result of this work. The Don River is located more than
430 m from the property. All of the excess excavated fill and construction materials will be
removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is located within a highly urbanized area surrounded by both commercial
and residential developments. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues evident at this
site. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas.
CFN: 33654
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: October 17, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
Application #: 394/02/TOR
8.1.6 CITY OF TORONTO - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
To construct in a flood plain on (Ravenscrest Park), in the City of Toronto
(Etobicoke Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on
the property owned by City of Toronto - Economic Development.
The purpose is to demolish the existing staircase on a valley slope and construct a new
staircase adjacent to it, being slightly within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Drawing No. 1, and Sections and Details, Drawing No. 2, prepared by C.J.
Hartley Limited, dated September 2002, date received October 15, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
656
Proposal:
The existing staircase is located on the valley slope associated with Mimico Creek and allows
pedestrian access to Ravenscrest Park from a walkway between two homes on Ravenscrest
Drive. The existing staircase is very steep and in need of some repairs. In addition, the
existing staircase presently crosses the rear portion of the private lot at 34 Ravenscrest. The
City therefore, proposes to demolish the existing staircase and construct a new staircase, at a
slightly gentler incline which will result in the bottom of the new staircase projecting
approximately 4 metres out beyond the bottom of the existing staircase. The new staircase will
be relocated slightly to the west of the existing staircase and entirely on municipal land, with
the bottom of the steps being located partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
Control of Flooding:
The entire staircase is located above the 100 Year flood elevation, with the bottom 4 steps of
the staircase being located within the flood fringe portion of the Regional Storm Floodplain.
Authority staff have reviewed the proposed works and are satisfied that the conveyance and
storage of flood waters will not be affected.
Pollution:
The proposed works will be located approximately 180 metres from the watercourse and all
excess fill material will be removed from the site. Sediment and erosion control measures will
be implemented and maintained on the site.
Conservation of Land:
The existing and proposed replacement staircase is located on the valley slope. The new
staircase will provide safer access to Ravenscrest Park and will remove the existing staircase
from private property. No riparian vegetation will be removed as a result of the proposed
works and the site will be restored upon completion of the construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33664
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: October 18, 2002
Application #: 402/02/TOR
8.1.7 CHRISTOPHER AND HELEN DUVERNET
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 25, 26, Plan 3451, (38 Orchard
Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Mimico
Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Christopher and Helen
Duvernet.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the
construction of 2 new additions, measuring a total of 82 sq. m., onto the rear of an existing
single family dwelling, being within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Mimico Creek and the
proposed Special Policy Area for the Etobicoke District.
657
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Survey, Site Plan Al, Basement A2, Ground Floor Plan A3, Sections A and B,
Elevations Al2 and A13, prepared by Richard Barnett Architect, dated May 25, 2002,
received August 30, 2002, Letter from Structural Engineer verifying flood depth and
velocity protection, prepared by, dated September 2002, received September 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the
construction of two new additions, measuring a total of 82 sq. m., onto rear of an existing
single family dwelling. The entire home is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of
Mimico Creek and within the proposed Special Policy Area for the Etobicoke District.
Control of Flooding:
Both the existing home and the proposed additions will be dry floodproofed to the 350 year
storm elevation.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located a distance of 150 metres from Mimico Creek. The area
between the proposed works and the creek are flat, manicured and include a neighbouring
home and city street, therefore sedimentation of the watercourse as a result of construction
should not occur.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed addition is consistent with existing development in the corridor reach and there
are no significant resource features on site. There are no fisheries or geotechnical issues
associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1. (B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Re- development within Designated Two Zone areas of Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33500
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 18, 2002
Application #: 365/02/TOR
8.1.8 PETER HERRMANN
To place fill within a regulated area on Part 3 Plan RANGE 1, (58 Grenview
Boulevard South), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area),
Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Peter Herrmann.
658
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition of
the existing one storey addition located at the rear of the residence and the replacement with a
new slightly larger one storey addition with crawlspace, and the construction of an attached
rear deck.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Basement & Ground Site Plan, Drawing No. Al, Basement Ground
Details, Drawing No. A2, and Second, Front, Side and Rear Elevations, Drawing No.
A3, prepared by David Moskal Designs, date received October 16, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition of
the existing one storey addition located at the rear of the residence and the replacement with a
new slightly larger one storey addition with crawlspace on the tableland portion of the subject
lot. The new addition will project approximately 2 metres beyond the wall of the existing rear
addition and a new deck will be attached to the addition.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located entirely above the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the
conveyance and storage of flood water will not be affected.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the top of bank and the proposed works in order to
impede the overland flow of construction generated sediment.
Conservation of Land:
The new rear addition and attached deck will maintain a 10 metre setback from the top of bank
of the valley slope and is consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. There are
no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.2 (D) - Replacement Structures - and
Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33660
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: October 18, 2002
659
Application #: 398/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO (HUMBER YORK COMMUNITY)
8.1.9 GEOFFREY ATKINS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 29, Plan 2991, (29 Mill Cove), in the
City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council Area), Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Geoffrey Atkins.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of an existing sunroom located above the basement walkout at the rear of the house in order to
construct a new family room and breakfast area in the same area but extending further across
the rear of the house. The existing deck will also be reconstructed.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Site Plan, Basement Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan and Roof Plan,
West Elevation and East Elevation, South Elevation and North Elevation, and Building
Section, Drawing Nos. P -1, P -2, P -3, P -4, P -5, and P -6, prepared by Design Details,
dated September 5, 2002, date received September 17, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of an existing sunroom located above the basement walkout at the rear of the house in order to
construct a new family room and breakfast area, and the reconstruction of the existing deck.
The addition will be constructed in the same area but extending further across the rear of the
house. The existing house and attached deck are located on the tableland portion of the
property, with the house maintaining a 6 metre setback from the top of bank of the Humber
River valley slope and the deck being approximately 1 metre from the stable top of bank. The
new addition will maintain the same setback as the existing sunroom, while the new deck will
simply replace the old deck structure.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located entirely above the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the
storage and conveyance of flood water will not be impacted.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located approximately 50 metres from the Humber River and a silt
fence will be installed between the top of bank and the work area in order to prevent sediment
from entering the watercourse.
660
Conservation of Land:
The proposed new addition will replace the existing sunroom situated at the rear of the house.
Although slightly larger, the new addition will be extended lengthwise across the rear wall of
the house and will not project beyond the existing building footprint and will maintain the
identical 6 metre setback from the top of bank. The proposed works also include replacing the
existing raised deck. The proposal is consistent with existing development in the corridor
reach and there are no geotechnical /slope stability issues associated with the project. No
significant resource features are affected by the proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.2 (C) - Minor Additions and Section 4.2.2
(D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
CFN: 33498
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: September 18, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY)
Application #: 360/02/TOR
8.1.10 THE SCARBORO GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB LIMITED
To place fill within a regulated area on (321 Scarborough Golf Club Road), in the
City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by The Scarboro Golf and Country
Club Limited.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Highland Creek to
facilitate the relocation of an existing cart path on a valley slope.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Site Plan and Cart Path Relocation for Hole # 17, prepared by
Scarboro Golf and Country Club, date received September 30, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to relocate a 50 metre section of the existing cart path which traverses a fairly
steep area of the valley slope and relocating the pathway slightly to the north for an
approximate length of 65 metres. The new location has a more gentle grade and is more
readily accessible for the golf carts. The new path construction will involve minimal vegetation
removal and the applicant proposes to plant and restore the old cart path.
661
Control of Flooding:
The proposed grading changes are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain,
therefore the storage and conveyance of flood water will not be impacted.
Pollution:
A sediment and erosion control fence will be located between the proposed works and the
watercourse in order to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse, being located
approximately 50 metres distance.
Conservation of Land:
The existing cart path traverses a fairly steep valley slope, while the relocated portion will
traverse a more gentle section of the valley slope and will involve some regrading to achieve a
15 to 20% grade in order to permit easier access for the golf carts. The pathway construction
will involve some vegetation removal, however woody plant material will be replanted on the
disturbed areas and the site restored. The proposed works are located beyond the riparian
zone associated with Highland Creek and will not impact any significant resource features.
There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33627
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: October 4, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 383/02/TOR
8.1.11 IOLE DIGIOVANNI
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 22, Plan M -1114, (135 Riverside
Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by lole DiGiovanni.
The purpose is to construct an addition to a single family dwelling within the Fill Regulated
Area of the Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Sketch showing Topography for Site development Purposes of Lot 22, Registered
Plan M -1114 dated October 3, 2002 received by TRCA on October 17, 2002 prepared
by Guido Papa Surveying Ltd.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
662
Proposal:
The proposal consists of building an addition, deck and carport onto an existing single family
dwelling located within the Fill Regulated Area and Special Policy Area of the Humber River. A
recently update of the floodlines in this area show that the subject property is no longer within
the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The subject property is located within an established
community of Woodbridge.
Control of Flooding:
As the subject property is outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain there will be no impacts
on flooding.
Pollution:
No pollution is expected from these works as they are located over 60 metres from the
watercourse and separated from the river by a municipal street.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries concerns. No significant resource features will be
impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Sections 4.2.2 (C) and (E) - Minor Additions and Property
Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program.
CFN: 33662
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: October 18, 2002
Application #: 400 /02/VAUG
8.1.12 JOFIAN HOLDINGS LTD.
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 20, Concession 8 , (5631 Old Major
Mackenzie Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located
on the property owned by Jofian Holdings Ltd..
The purpose is to place fill within a Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate
construction of a Stormwater Management Facility and outran headwall and channel to service
Draft Plan of Subdivision 19T- 98VO4, City of Vaughan..
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2007 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Stormwater Management Pond, Drawing 98107 -CD1, prepared by EMC Group Limited,
dated January 2002 revised to September 16, 2002.
• Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Drawing 98107 -ES, prepared by EMC Group
Limited, dated January 2002 revised to September 16, 2002.
663
• Grading Plan, Drawings 98107 -GR3 and 98107 -GR4, prepared by EMC Group Limited,
dated January 2002 revised to September 16, 2002.
• Stormwater Management Pond Planting Plan, Berm & Restoration Plan and Planting
Details Plan, Drawings L -2, L -3 and D -1, prepared by The MBTW Group, dated June
2002, revised to October 2, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a stormwater management pond including an outfall headwall and
emergency spillway, a landscaped screening berm, and to conduct associated site grading
within a Regulated Area of the Humber River. The pond will be sited in a disturbed area
outside of the main valley corridor and will outlet to an existing drainage swale along the north
side of Major MacKenzie Drive which ultimately drains to the Humber River. The works are
being undertaken in accordance with previously approved preliminary engineering plans to
service draft plan of Subdivision 19T- 98VO4.
Control of Flooding:
The area of the proposed works are not within the Regional Storm Floodplain associated with
the Humber River and accordingly, there are no impacts to the control or conveyance of
flooding.
Pollution:
Detailed sediment and erosion control fencing is to be installed prior to the commencement of
works to prevent sedimentation of the valley corridor.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be stabilized and enhanced with detailed native species landscaping
which shall be provided in and around the stormwater management pond, and several
tableland buffer areas which were determined at the time of draft plan approval. There are no
fisheries impacts associated with the works as the pond will be draining into an existing swale
that does not contain fish habitat. No geotechnical issues relating to erosion or slope stability
have been identified.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policies.
CFN: 33504
Report Prepared by: Jason Scott, extension 5280
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: September 19, 2002
664
Application #: 367 /02/VAUG
TOWN OF CALEDON
8.1.13 BROADBENT PETER
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 29, Concession 7, (17635
Highway 50), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Broadbent Peter.
The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in order to
construct a garage and loft storage area on a rural estate.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan- Proposed Three Car Garage with Loft Storage, prepared by Peter
Broadbent, received by TRCA on October 09, redline revised for sediment control
fencing on October 18, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of placing fill for the construction of a 78 square metre (840 square feet)
three car garage located within a Fill Regulated Area but outside of the Regional Storm
Floodplain of the Humber River at 17635 Hwy 50. The front portion of the rural estate property
is an Environmentally Significant Area, and the proposed garage is to be located in a grassed
area approximately 27 metres from the boundary of the Environmentally Significant Area (ESA).
Ecology staff have determined that the proposal will not impact the ESA. The subject property
currently has a two storey residence (approximately 2970 square meters) on -site, also setback
approximately 27 metres from the ESA. Approximately 26 cubic metres of fill will be placed in
order to lay the foundation for the garage. The subject property is located on the Oak Ridges
Moraine, in an area classified as Natural Core Area by the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation
Plan (ORMCP). Although the proposal is not the subject of a planning application and
therefore not subject to the ORMCP, Authority staff are of the opinion that the proposal
maintains the ecological integrity of the Moraine.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River
and are not expected to affect the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
The proposed works are located approximately 360 metres from the Humber River, with forest
vegetation separating the works from the river. Sedimentation as a result of these works is not
expected.
665
Conservation of Land:
The works are located in a grassed area approximately 27 metres from an Environmentally
Significant Area on the Oak Ridges Moraine. Sediment fencing will be erected between the
works and the ESA to ensure that sediment does not impact the ecological integrity of the ESA.
The grassed area will be re- seeded after the works are completed. There are no fisheries or
geotechnical issues associated with the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.1 (C)- Minor Additions of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33640
Report Prepared by: Erin Pratley, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: October 10, 2002
Application #: 388/02/CAL
8.1.14 KEN SPEIRS ORCHARDS INC.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on, (1048 Mayfield
Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Ken Speirs Orchards Inc..
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Regional Storm Floodplain and the Fill
Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed, in order to facilitate the repair of a post and
wire fence adjacent to an off -line pond on an agricultural property.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Part Print of Humber 137 Showing Pond Excavation and Fill Details, by Ken Speirs,
received by TRCA on September 30, 2002, redline revised by TRCA on October 16,
2002 for sediment and erosion control details.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within an off-line pond in a Fill Regulated Area and
within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River in order to facilitate the
re- instatement of a portion of a post and wire fence adjacent to the pond. The subject property
is located on the north side of Mayfield Road, east of Dixie Road and is currently used for
agricultural purposes. The fence surrounds the property and the portion in need of repair is
located along the rear of the property within the floodplain. The fence delineates the property
limits and the adjacent neighbour has requested the fence line be reinstated. The fence is
insufficiently setback from the edge of the pond and has collapsed due to undermining and
erosion at the base. Approximately 460 cubic metres of fill will be excavated from the southern
portion of the pond, and placed along the eastern edge of the pond to provide a more stable
base for reinstating the fence . Although the subject property is located in the floodplain, both
engineering and ecology staff have reviewed the proposal and have no concerns or objections.
666
Control of Flooding:
There will be no change in the conveyance or storage of floodwaters as the proposed works
involve the excavation and placement of fill material within the pond to support the
reinstatement of the post and wire fence which currently exists in disrepair.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be installed along the edge of the pond adjacent to the watercourse prior
to, during and after the works take place to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
During the works the pond will be emptied away from the creek onto the adjacent agricultural
field. Therefore, no sedimentation of the watercourse is expected.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored to current conditions. As the stream is off -line, there are no
fisheries related concerns. As well, no significant resource features will be affected and there
are no geotechnical concerns.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E)- Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures -
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33629
Report Prepared by: Erin Pratley, extension 5244
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: October 4, 2002
Application #: 385/02/CAL
8.1.15 KEVIN HENDERSON & DEBORAH YOUNG
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 168, Plan BOL -7, (88 King Street East), in the
Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned
by Kevin Henderson & Deborah Young.
The purpose is to construct an ancillary structure (deck) adjoining a residential house within
the Regional Storm floodplain in the Bolton Special Policy Area at 88 King Street East, Bolton.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Legal Survey Showing Deck Location at 88 King Street, received by TRCA on
September 26, 2002.
• Deck and Railing Support Details, prepared by K. Henderson, received by TRCA on
September 26, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
667
Proposal:
The proposal consists of constructing an ancillary deck within the Regional Storm Floodplain in
the Bolton Special Policy Area at 88 King Street East. The entire property is located within the
Regional Storm Floodplain and within the Bolton Special Policy Area. There is currently a
single family residence on the subject property. The proposed deck is approximately 32
square metres (344 square feet) and is to be located at the rear of the house outside of the
hydraulic floodway, thus satisfying the Authority's requirements for ancillary structures in
developed areas. All existing grades will remain unchanged. The posts are to be anchored
with concrete 1.2 metres into the ground, to help ensure that the structure will remain secure
during a flooding event.
Control of Flooding:
The majority of the deck structure will be located approximately 1.22 metres (4 feet) above
ground, with supporting posts and access stairs located at ground level. The proposed deck
is 344 square feet (32 square metres) in size. Due to the deck's size and location above
ground level, the proposal will have no affect on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
No sedimentation of the watercourse is expected from the proposed works as they are located
approximately 110 metres from the watercourse, with residential development between the
property and the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is located within an existing residential area, and is void of significant
vegetation. There are no significant resource features on site, and there are no
geotechnical /slope stability issues related to the proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B)- Development/Redevelopment within
Designated Special Policy Areas and Section 4.2.2 (E)- Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33589
Report Prepared by: Erin Pratley, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: September 27, 2002
Application #: 376/02/CAL
8.1.16 NOEL & LEANNE PRESLEY
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 140, Plan BOL -7, (114 Old King
Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Noel & Leanne Presley.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River, in
order to facilitate the construction of a new 61 square metre (200 square foot) basement
addition and a new 66 square metre (216 square foot) family room addition onto an existing
residential dwelling.
668
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Plot Plan, Foundation Plan, First Floor Plan, North, South and West
Elevations and Basement & First Floor Electrical Plans, prepared by Karabin
Developments Inc., received September 30, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River watershed to facilitate
the construction of a basement and family room addition onto an existing residential dwelling
located at 114 Old King Road, Bolton. The additions are proposed at the rear of the 386 square
metre (1266.5 sq. ft.) residence. The basement addition will be approximately 61 square
metres (200 square feet) in size while the family room addition will be approximately 66 square
metres (216 square feet) in size.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works will not be located in the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore will
not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed works will take place approximately 240 metres (787 feet) from the watercourse.
No sedimentation of the watercourse is expected as a result of the proposed works. All
excavated fill will be removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
The entire project will be undertaken at the southwest portion of the existing dwelling and is
consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. The proposed works are not located
near any significant resource features and there are no slope stability /geo- technical issues
associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33626
Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: October 3, 2002
669
Application #: 381/02/CAL
TOWN OF MARKHAM
8.1.17 AURELIO FILICE
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 26, Plan 3684, (18 Riverbend
Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Aurelio Filice.
The purpose is to rehabilitate the vaileyland portion of an existing residential lot. The existing
dwelling will be demolished and a new dwelling is proposed to be constructed..
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit.
• Drawing 301 - Siting Plan - Part 2, prepared by T. Politis, Politis Engineering Ltd., date
revised October 9, 2002, date received September 30, 2002 (redline revised to
indicate location of silt fence)
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to rehabilitate the vaileyland portion of an existing residential lot. TRCA staff
accepted a severance application to create the new lot, subject to a condition of approval for
rehabilitating the vaileyland portion of the property to the satisfaction of Authority staff. The
Town of Markham also issued a condition of approval that the valleylands be dedicated to the
Town. The valley slope on the lot is steep but well treed with a retaining wall in need of repair.
The applicant is proposing to rehabilitate by removing the failing retaining wall and re- grading
the slope to a maximum 3:1 slope. Existing trees will be maintained, and disturbed soils will be
restored and stabilized with native, non - invasive species. The location of the new dwelling on
the lot was accepted by TRCA staff through our review of the site plan application. The house
will be situated outside of the Fill Regulated Area and will be sufficiently set back from the
stable top of bank.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works will not be located in the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River,
and therefore the conveyance and storage of flood waters will not be affected.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be established and maintained on site for the duration of construction, in order
to prevent any construction generated sediment from entering the watercourse. All excess fill
will be removed from site.
Conservation of Land:
There are no outstanding geotechnical issues related to this project. There are no fisheries
issues, nor will any natural resource features be affected by the proposed works. All disturbed
soils will be stabilized and restored with planting in accordance with the Authority's
landscaping guidelines.
670
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 - Development & Redevelopment/Intensification
Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33638
Report Prepared by: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: October 8, 2002
Application #: 386/02 /MARK
8.1.18 TOM FUNG
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 8, Plan 2489, (10 Second Street), in
the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Tom Fung.
The purpose is to place excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area at 10 Second Street
in the Town of Markham, Lot 8 Plan 2489, Rouge River Watershed Construction on the property
owned by Tom Fung.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Grading Plan of Part of Lot 8, Registered Plan 2489, Town of Markham Regional
Municipality of York by Ertl Surveyors, Ontario Land Surveyors, 1234 Reid Street, Unit
10, Richmond Hill, Plans dated July 31, 2002
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a two storey brick veneer residence with basement in the Town of
Markham. The entire property falls within a Ontario Regulation 158 fill permit area and is
located within the Markham SPA.
Control of Flooding:
The location for the proposed development is located within the Unionville SPA but revised
floodplain mapping shows the proposed development to be located outside of the floodline
boundaries, however the structure sits above the Regional Storm level of 173.62 m. The
control of flooding will not be affected by the proposed works. All excavated fill material will be
removed from the site.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected to impact the stream as the site is located away from the stream
and sediment fencing will be erected before construction is undertaken and removed upon
completion.
671
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope instability or geotechnical issues evident at this site. No significant resource
features will be impacted by the proposed works; and all disturbed and graded areas will be
revegetated following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.1 B - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Area or Special Policy Area and
Section 4.2.2 G - Infilling of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33561
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: September 25, 2002
Application #: 373 /02 /MARK
8.1.19 JOHN & MILYDA SCOTT
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 39, 38, Plan 65R- 14653, Part 1 Plan
65R- 14653, (12 Eckardt Street), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
Watershed as located on the property owned by John & Milyda Scott.
The purpose is to construct a minor addition in a Fill Regulated Area on 12 Eckardt Street in
the Town of Markham. The house is located within the Rouge River Watershed..
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plans by Barn Owl Designs 445 Apple Creek Blvd., Suite 215, Markham, Ontario
for The Scott Residence 12 Eckardt Street, Unionville, Ontario received September
30th, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to create additional living space to the home on the existing foundation in a fill
regulated area. This work will require the partial demolishing of the existing first floor walls,
which will be rebuilt with the addition of a second floor. The work will require minor excavation
in the front yard of the house. The subject property is within an existing residential
neighbourhood of Markham. There will be no loss of any natural features as a result of this
work.
Control of Flooding:
As the proposed works are outside of the regional storm floodplain there will be no impact on
the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
672
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be erected prior to construction and will remain until the works are
complete and the disturbed areas will be sodded upon the completion of the work.
Conservation of Land:
The property is located within a developed portion of the Town of Markham and the subject
property is currently a residential lot. There are no resource features on the property and the
additions are of a minor nature and will slightly increase the current building envelope.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 C - Minor Additions within Highly Urbanized Areas
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33599
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: October 2, 2002
Application #: 380 /02 /MARK
8.1.20 TRACY CALLAHAN AND ROBERT OFFLEY
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 6, Concession 5, (47 Glenbourne Park
Drive), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Tracy Callahan and Robert Offley.
The purpose is to construct a minor addition to the home located at 47 Glenbourne Park Drive
which is located within a Fill Regulated Area..
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plans prepared by Stelhew R.R. #1 Unionville, L3R 2L6 received October 1, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to remove an existing room and foundation of the house and to construct a
new room and foundation of slightly smaller size located slightly to the left of its current
position. The work will require some minor excavation and all fill material will be removed from
the site.
673
Control of Flooding:
As the proposed works are outside of the regional storm floodplain there will be no impact on
the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be erected prior to construction and will remain until the works are
complete and the disturbed areas sodded upon completion of the work.
Conservation of Land:
The property is located within a developed portion of the Town of Markham and the subject
property is currently a residential lot. There are no resource features on the property and the
addition is minor and will actually slightly decrease the building envelope.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 C - Minor Additions within Highly Urbanized Areas
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33657
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: October 17, 2002
Application #: 396/02 /MARK
8.1.21 ZAINOOL KHAN
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10, Concession 8 Lot 10, Plan 5937,
(27 Carolwood Crescent), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Zainool Khan.
The purpose is to permit the movement of fill in order to replace an existing septic system
serving an existing residential dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing No. 1 - Site Plan Showing Locations of Existing House, Septic Bed, Wells -
prepared by DGF, Haddad Geotechnical Inc., date received October 17, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to replace an existing septic system within the Fill Regulated Area, to service
an existing residential dwelling. The replacement is required because of the age of the existing
system and in order to accommodate a proposed addition to the existing dwelling. The
addition will expand the second storey of the dwelling, and will not be situated in the Fill
Regulated Area.
674
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River
and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be in place for the duration of construction in order to prevent sediment from
entering the adjacent watercourse. All excess fill will be removed from site and all disturbed
areas will be restored to their original condition.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the proposed works. No significant
natural resource features will be affected by the proposed works and a silt fence will prevent
sediment into the adjacent watercourse. All disturbed areas will be restored to their original
condition.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.6 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33668
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: October 21, 2002
TOWNSHIP OF KING
Application #: 403 /02 /MARK
8.1.22 EVAN WHITE AND JANE PATTERSON
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 3, Concession 7 Plan 280, (12725 8th
Concession), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Jane Patterson.
The purpose is to construct an equestrian arena within the Fill Regulated Area of the Humber
River, and erect an agricultural fence partially within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the
Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Location of proposed arena and fence drawn on Humber River sheet 56, received by
TRCA on September 17, 2002 and redline revised October 21, 2002.
• Correspondence from Evan White dated October 21, 2002 addressing excavated fill,
disturbed area and authorizing red line revision.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
675
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct an equestrian arena within the fill regulated area of the Humber
River and to erect an agricultural fence partially within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the
Humber River. The subject property is currently used as a horse farm and has a single family
dwelling on it.
Control of Flooding:
As the proposed arena is outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and the proposed fence
is outside of the hydraulic floodway, there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of
flood waters.
Pollution:
The proposed arena is over 50 metres from the watercourse, and therefore no sedimentation of
the watercourse is expected.
Conservation of Land:
There proposed arena and fence are on a flat portion of the property; as such there are no
slope stability issues related to the works. In addition there are no concerns with fisheries and
there are no significant resource features on the site. All disturbed areas are to be restored
following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33505
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: September 19, 2002
676
Application #: 368/02/KING
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES.#B139/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Ron Moeser
THAT permits be granted In accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.23 - 8.1.28, with the exception of 8.1.24 - Sandringham Place Inc.), that had been
scheduled on the agenda as errata Items, for which all the required information was
received and finalized as listed below.
RES. #B140 /02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
8.1.24 - Sandringham Place Inc.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
CARRIED
THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application
8.1.24 - Sandringham Place Inc., that had been scheduled on the agenda as an errata
item, for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.23 RAMGARHIA ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO INC.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 34, Plan
43M -1298, (Peter Robertson Boulevard), in the City of Brampton, Etobicoke
Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Ramgarhia Association
of Ontario Inc..
The purpose is to place and remove fill to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall in
the Etobicoke Creek Floodplain to service the development of a place of worship on the
adjacent site.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004.
•
•
•
Site Plan, Drawing No. Al, prepared by Joseph D. Battaglia Architect, dated
March 10, 2002, revised August 07, 2002.
Site Servicing Plan Grading, Drawing No. C1, prepared by Delta Engineering
Services, dated March 18, 2002, revised August 08, 2002.
Site Servicing Plan Drainage, Drawing No. C2, prepared by Delta Engineering
Services, dated March 18, 2002, revised October 23, 2002.
Details, Drawing No. C3, prepared by Delta Engineering Services, dated March
18, 2002.
677
• Site Servicing Specifications, Drawing No. C4, prepared by Delta Engineering
Services, dated March 18, 2002, revised August 08, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose of the application is to place and remove fill for the construction of a stormwater
outfall structure in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Etobicoke Creek to service the
development of a place of worship on the northwest corner of Peter Robertson Blvd. and Dixie
Road in the City of Brampton. The proposed headwall is to be located at the end of an existing
rip rap structure and will discharge into an existing stormwater management pond, which has
been designed to accommodate stormwater from the site. The valley area has been
landscaped in accordance with a previous TRCA permit approval for the stormwater
management pond and all disturbed vegetation will be reinstated after construction. The area
of disturbance will be minimized in order to protect existing vegetation in the valley.
Control of Flooding:
The headwall structure will maintain existing grades within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
Therefore, the proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed and maintained during construction
to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse. The area of disturbance will be minimized to
protect nearby vegetation. All disturbed vegetation will be reinstated following construction.
Conservation of Land:
Since the headwall will be outletting into an existing stormwater management pond, there are
no fisheries related issues. There are no geotechnical concerns associated with this proposal.
All disturbed vegetation will be reinstated.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33497
Report Prepared by: Erin Pratley, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: September 18, 2002
Application #: 361 /02 /BRAM
8.1.24 SANDRINGHAM PLACE INC.
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area
on Lot 13, 14, Concession 5 , (Sandalwood Parkway East), in the City of
Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Sandringham Place Inc..
678
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction
of a stormwater outfall located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River, to
service a residential subdivision in the Springdale Neighbourhood #901, City of Brampton.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2007.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide revised engineering plans) by Rand
Engineering Corporation, dated October 29, 2002, received October 30, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide revised landscape restoration plans) by NAK
Design Group, dated October 30, 2002, received October 30, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction
of a stormwater outfall located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The proposed outfall is
located just south of the Sandalwood Parkway crossing of the Humber River H2 tributary, just
west of the intersection of Sandalwood Parkway East and Torbram Road, in the City of
Brampton. The H2 tributary has been recently re- classified as a cold water tributary by the
Ministry of Natural Resources. The outfall is proposed in an area currently under investigation
for violations under the Federal Fisheries Act and the Lakes and Rivers Improvements Act
associated with unauthorized clearing and grading in the Regional Storm Floodplain and the
resulting siltation of the watercourse. The proponent is currently working with the respective
agencies to remediate the violation area and Authority staff have received correspondence
from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans indicating that they would not object to the
issuance of a permit for the proposed outfall provided it meets standard design criteria. The
outfall pipe is located approximately 10 metres from the watercourse and includes a
naturalized low flow channel connection to the tributary.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed outfall works will not affect the storage or conveyance of storm flows as the
original grade elevations in this area will be maintained.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed and maintained during construction
to prevent any sediment from entering the watercourse. Any disturbed areas will be
revegetated following construction with appropriate species. Authority staff will be including a
letter of advice applying the Ministry of Natural Resources Coldwater Timing Restrictions and,
given the violation history in this area, have urged the applicant to take extra initiative to ensure
the sediment control measures are properly installed and maintained.
Conservation of Land:
Although there are concerns with impact to fisheries and the Toss of significant vegetation as a
result of the violations in this location, these issues are being addressed through a separate
restoration plan. As such, there are no geotechnical, fisheries, or significant vegetation
concerns associated with the design of this proposal.
679
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33422
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: August 15, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 317 /02 /BRAM
8.1.25 ANTHONY COLUCCI
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 15, Plan 65M -2863, (332 Westridge
Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Anthony Colucci.
The purpose is to regrade within a Fill Regulated area of the Humber River to facilitate the
installation of an inground pool..
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004.
•
•
Sheet L -01, Colucci Residence prepared by Gib -San Environmnetals dated
August 7, 2002 and received by TRCA on September 26, 2002.
Pool, Mr. Anthony Colucci Residence, showing cross sections, received by
TRCA on October 23, 2002.
New Pool /Patio details for Mr. Antony Colucci Residence received by TRCA on
October 23, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating fill material and regrading as part of the installation of an
inground swimming pool. The subject property is located partially within the Fill Regulated
Area of the Humber River.
Control of Flooding:
Since the subject property is not located within the Regional Storm flood plain, there will be no
impacts on flooding.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from these works as they are over 150 metres from the
watercourse.
680
Conservation of Land:
There are no natural features, geotechnical concerns or fisheries concerns on the site. All
excavated material will be removed from the site and the area restored after construction is
complete.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33648
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: October 16, 2002
Application #: 391 /02NAUG
8.1.26 JULIANNE KIM -LONGO
To place fill within a regulated area on, (276 Fletcher Drive), in the City of
Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Julianne
Kim - Longo.
The purpose is to excavate fill and re -grade to facilitate construction of an inground pool within
the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004.
•
•
Pool, Lot 118 prepared by Lul Longo received by TRCA on October 23, 2002.
X- Section of Lot 118 prepared by Lui Longo received by TRCA on October 31,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to remove fill and to re -grade to facilitate the construction of an inground pool
within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River. The proposed works are located on a lot of
record in an approved plan of subdivision within the Don River valley.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm flood plain. Therefore there will
be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
As the proposed construction is over 60 metres from the watercourse and is separated from
the watercourse by a storm water management pond, no pollution of the watercourse is
expected.
681
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on a lot that backs onto a valley outside of the Regional Storm
flood plain. There are no significant resource features on the site or geotechnical issues
related to the proposal. All excess fill will be removed from the site as part of the work.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33630
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: October 4, 2002
Application #: 382 /02/VAUG
8.1.27 MARIA TESA
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 3, Concession 7 , (7426 Islington
Avenue), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Maria Tesa.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to
construct a gabion retaining wall to address a violation and remedy a destabilized slope.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004.
•
•
•
Letter of undertaking prepared by Ron Mauti Architect dated October 23, 2002
and received by TRCA on October 24, 2002 addressing landscaping and final
certification of the gabion wall.
Letter from Soil -Eng Limited dated August 29, 2002 addressing the stability of
the partially constructed gabion wall.
Proposed gabion wall at 7426 Islington Avenue prepared by Ron Mauti Architect
dated March 4, 2002 and received by TRCA on March 12, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is located within the Fill Line of the Humber River and contains a valley
slope associated with the Humber. The applicant has partially constructed a gabion retaining
wall without obtaining a permit from TRCA. Charges were laid, the applicant pleaded guilty
and the matter was resolved in court with a fine and a court order. The subject permit
application is material to the court order. The toe of the slope has been cut away,
over - steepening the slope and leaving the area void of vegetation while the bottom two tiers of
the wall were constructed. Construction activity stopped, however the slope is currently
exposed and eroding. Despite deviation from standard TRCA policies and in Tight of the
conviction and court order to resolve the violation, it is recommended that this permit be
approved to allow the rest of the wall to be constructed, as the slope is currently unstable.
682
There is an existing home on the property located a few metres from the bottom of the slope.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and accordingly,
there will be no impacts on flooding.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from these works as they are located over 100 metres from the
watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The applicant has cut into the valley wall of the Humber over - steepening the slope. A
geotechnical report was submitted that has verified that the wall will be structurally sound.
TRCA staff will require a follow -up geotechnical report upon completion of construction from a
qualified engineer confirming that the works have been conducted in accordance with the
approved plans. The applicant will be planting native species in suitable disturbed areas to
enhance slope stability.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal does not comply with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program, however to remedy the unstable slope, it is recommended that the permit be
approved to allow the applicant to complete construction of the gabion wall, stabilize the slope
and restore the area to the best possible condition.
CFN: 33015
Report Prepared by: Patricia Young, extension 5324
For Information contact: Jason Scott, extension 5280
Date: March 13, 2002
TOWN OF CALEDON
Application #: 103 /02/VAUG
8.1.28 CLUBLINK CORPORATION
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area,
(Caledon Woods Golf Course, on the west side of Highway 50, north of
McCauley Drive), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located
on the property owned by ClubLink Corporation.
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction
of a replacement water intake structure within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber
River on the Caledon Woods Golf Course.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004.
• River Intake Pump System Plan - Sections and Details, drawing no. W10,
prepared by Philips Engineering, dated May 2001.
683
•
Letter of Undertaking to resolve outstanding concerns surrounding the elevation
of the intake structure and minor ecological concerns, prepared by Kenneth R.
DePodesta of Philips Engineering, dated October 22, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction
of a replacement water intake structure within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber
River. The subject property is the Caledon Woods Golf Course located on the west side of
Highway 50 just north of McCauley Drive. The golf course has recently undergone significant
modifications which were reviewed and approved by the Authority. The proposed water intake
structure will draw water into on -site reservoirs to be used for watering the golf course. The
structure will be installed in the watercourse bank and only draw water when flows exceed the
60% summer flow duration as specified by Authority engineering staff. The structure will
replace an existing diesel pump that currently draws water at any time from the base of the
cold water tributary. The subject property lies entirely within the Oak Ridge Moraine. Although
the proposal is not the subject of a planning application and therefore not subject to the Oak
Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, Authority staff are of the opinion this application will
maintain the ecological integrity of the Moraine.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed structure will not impact the conveyance or storage of storm flows as it will
match and maintain the existing grade elevations within the watercourse bank and the
Regional Storm Floodplain.
Pollution:
Acceptable dewatering techniques and sediment and erosion control structures will be
installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the
watercourse. All disturbed areas will be restored and stabilized following construction with
appropriate materials.
Conservation of Land:
Meander belt analysis has confirmed that the structure will not be located in an area subject to
significant long term erosion impacts. No significant vegetation removal is proposed and there
are no geotechnical concerns. An appropriately sized grate will prevent any impacts to fish
habitat.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Sections 4.2.2 - Development &
Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas,
and 4.3 Infrastructure & Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program.
684
CFN: 33495
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: September 18, 2002
Application #: 364/02/CAL
CITY OF TORONTO (EAST YORK COMMUNITY)
8.1.29 CITYSCAPE DEVELOPMENT CORP.
To construct in a flood plain on Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 ,6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, Plan 108,
Part Lot 7, 8, Plan 108, (55 Mill Street - Buildings 74, 58 and 59), in the City of
Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located
on the property owned by Cityscape Development Corp..
The purpose is to renovate the existing 3- storey Cannery building (Bldg. Nos. 58 & 59) and the
4- storey Case Goods building (Bldg. No. 74) to facilitate the conversion of the vacant
warehouse structures on the Gooderham and Worts site, for the purpose of creating art studios
and galleries.
The permit will be issued for the period of November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Context Plan, Drawing No. A -100, Site Plan, Drawing No. A -101, Ground Floor Plan,
Drawing No. A -201, Case Good Elevations & Building Sections, Drawing No. A-401,
Cannery Elevations & Building Sections, Drawing No. A -402, prepared by Zeldler
Grinnell Partnership Architects, dated October 17, 2002, date received October 18,
2002.
• Site Grading, Drawing No. 21905- LG -01, dated May, 2002 and Site Servicing, Drawing
No. 21905- SS -01, dated April, 2002, all prepared by TSH Engineers, date received
October 18, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is located entirely within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River
and within the Lower Don Special Policy Area, directly north of the railway line. The site
contains a number of historic buildings associated with the Gooderham and Worts distillery
complex which the City of Toronto is promoting for future development as an artist and theatre
area.
685
The proposal is to undertake interior renovations to two vacant buildings situated within the
southwesterly portion of the site, being the joined building nos. 58 and 59, known as the
Cannery building, and building no. 74, known as the Case Goods building. Artscape, the
proponent, is interested in leasing the buildings from Cityscape Development, the applicant, in
order to facilitate the construction of artist studios and galleries with retail space. The
proposed works involve the lowering of the ground floor of the Cannery building by 0.54
metres in order to achieve the required 10 ft. (3 m.) high ceilings for the proposed art gallery.
The existing loading doors in the Cannery building will also be lowered to meet the sidewalk
level in order to permit pedestrian and handicap access to the building. The lowered door
openings will be no lower than the existing ventilation grates on the south and west sides of the
Cannery building, thus subjecting the building to no greater depths of flooding. The Case
Goods building will maintain the existing ground floor elevation, and all exterior doorways will
remain the same. All mechanical and electrical systems will be located above the 350 -year
flood elevation and the buildings will be electronically connected with the Flood Warning
System.
The applicant This project is part of the City's future goal to redevelop the site to create an art
and theatre area and make the surrounding area more economically attractive.
Control of Flooding:
The site is located entirely within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and subject to
approximately 2.8 metres of flooding during a Regional Storm flood event and approximately
1.8 metres of flooding during the 350 -year flood event. The site is also located within the Lower
Don SPA which recognizes the existing commercial and residential development within the
floodplain and allows new development/redevelopment in the area, subject to new structures
meeting the minimum 350 -year floodproofing requirements. While both the Cannery and Case
Goods building are presently flood susceptible during the 350 -year flood event, the proposed
redevelopment of the site does not increase the risk of flooding to the buildings as the
Casegoods building will maintain both the same floor and door sill elevations, and the Cannery
building, while lowering the door sills to achieve handicap access, will also maintain the same
elevation as the existing ventilation grates. Major reconstruction of the buildings would be
required in order to floodproof the structures to meet the minimum 350 -year flood criteria. The
applicant has advised Authority staff that floodproofing measures are not possible due to the
historic nature of the buildings, whereby the existing structures and facades must be
maintained, and also that the cost of floodproofing would be prohibitive to the project.
Pollution:
The site is within the developed Lower Don community and far removed from any natural areas
including the Don River. Existing servicing is in place to address surface water runoff during
and after construction.
686
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works involve interior renovations to the Cannery and Case Goods buildings on
the historic Gooderham and Worts distillery site. The Authority has recently issued a permit to
allow the expansion of the parking facilities to the south and west of this site in order to
accommodate the increased usage of the area. There are no significant natural features on the
site and there are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project. Future
floodproofing measures (i.e. construction of a berm) are proposed for this portion of the Lower
Don SPA which would remove this area from the floodplain. Future floodproofing measures
however, could remove the subject property from the floodplain.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed construction does not, at the present time, comply with Section 4.2.1 (B) -
Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two
Zone /Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management
Program, since the existing structures are not floodproofed to the minimum 350 -year flood
level, nor will the proposed renovations and building restrictions permit the floodproofing
requirements.
CFN: 33671
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: October 21, 2002
Application #: 404/02/TOR
RES.#B141/02 - REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS
Adjacent to 4976 Highway 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of
York, CFN 33652. Receipt of a request to consider a land sale, long term
lease, rental or permission to construct a driveway across a parcel of
TRCA land adjacent to 4976 Regional Road 7 , located north of Regional
Road 7, east of Islington Avenue in the Woodbridge area of the City of
Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Irene Jones
THAT the request to consider a land sale, long term lease, rental or permission to
construct a driveway across a parcel of TRCA land adjacent to 4976 Regional Road 7,
located north of Regional Road 7, east of Islington Avenue in the Woodbridge area of the
City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, be referred to TRCA staff for review In
accordance with established TRCA policies;
AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future
date recommending further action.
CARRIED
687
BACKGROUND
This issue is being brought to your attention in accordance with Resolution #A289/94, adopted
by the members of TRCA at a meeting held on January 27, 1995. This resolution requires staff
to bring requests for the disposal of TRCA lands forward and requires Executive Committee
direction for staff to begin the technical review, agency circulation and public consultation, at
the end of which a recommendation will be made as to whether the property is surplus to
TRCA's needs and can be considered for possible disposal.
Robi Mitchell and Fred Emslie are the owners of 4976 Regional Road 7 which is the home
closest to the north east corner of Regional Road 7 and Islington Ave. Their driveway presently
enters onto Regional Road 7 quite close to the intersection at Islington Avenue. Robi Mitchell
and Fred Emslie have indicated that this intersection is very busy and exiting from their present
driveway is very dangerous.
Their request to TRCA to resolve this situation is to close the existing access to Regional Road
7 and extend the existing driveway north easterly across TRCA to Monsheen Drive. Robi
Mitchell and Fred Emslie are willing to consider a land sale, long term lease, rental or a
permission to construct this driveway across TRCA land.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands together with a sketch provided by
Robi Mitchell and Fred Emslie.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: October 16, 2002
Attachments: 2
688
Attachment 1
_vr
ledistrvatilm
L 0 T
RE: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL -OF AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS � %/f 1RCALAND3
Adjacent to-4976 Highway 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality SUBJECT PROPERTY
of York
CFN 33652
689
Attachment 2
RE: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL. OF AUTHORITY OWNED LANDS
AdJacelit to 4976H Day 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Manic!paIIt)
of'York
CFN 33652
690
RES. #B142/02 - LEASE OF A 2 COLOUR PRINTER
To replace a single colour Riso printer with a two colour printer
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Maria Augimeri
THAT the quotation from Riso Canada for the leasing of a V8000 digital 2 colour printer at
a cost of $1633.23 per month for 60 months be accepted, it being the product that best
meets Authority needs and specifications;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to take the necessary action to enter into an
agreement for provision of equipment from Riso Canada.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority closed down its two colour press printing operations in March 2001 upon the
retirement of its pressman. Staff re- evaluated their printing needs at that time and purchased a
digital one colour printer to continue to meet Authority printing needs and to replace an
outdated Riso printer. The equipment is now one year old.
Staff have used the Riso printer as an alternative to its press printing operations. It is capable
of doing most of the jobs which the press used to handle but with limitations. Recently, Riso
Canada launched their two colour printer to the market.
RATIONALE
For years, Authority staff have been in consultation with Riso staff to attach many of the
features of a press to their equipment. With the launching of their new two colour printer, Riso
has addressed many of the problems which staff have talked to them about. The new machine
has grippers, similar to a press, which feeds the paper into the machine and drops the image
in the same spot from sheet to sheet. It also drops down two colours at the same time with
excellent registration. In short, the new Riso has become a press /printer with the quality of a
press but the quickness of a printer.
Staff have evaluated the printer and found it to provide excellent printing ability, quick drying
times and easy operation. The majority of the jobs on the current Riso printer are two
colour/two sided jobs. Each colour dropped down means one pass- through the printer. As a
result, each of these jobs represents four passes through the machine which can be labour
intensive. The new Riso will cut production times in half.
Staff also considered farming out these jobs to outside printers. Comparison costs show that
the cost to print in -house is roughly one -third the cost compared to an outside printer. It also
meets the Authority's tighter time frames. In the past, Authority staff have had to print enough
brochures to last for a year usually having to throw out any extra's. Now, with the new Riso,
shorter runs will be possible and allow staff to provide current, updated and relevant
information. There will be less wastage as a result.
691
FINANCIAL DETAILS
One of the concerns which staff had was to justify the trading in of a one year old machine.
Riso has been generous in that they agreed to reimburse the original cost of the machine even
though it is a year old and had in excess of 600,000 copies through it.
Staff considered an outright purchase and because of capital cost, maintenance and
technology considerations are recommending a lease proposal.
Riso has proposed a cost per copy plan. This plan covers all consumables, equipment and
maintenance costs as well as providing full reimbursement for the current printer. The cost
was 3.78 cents per copy. Again, staff looked at the numbers and felt that the lease was
excessive and advised them accordingly.
Riso came back with a cost per copy of 3.266 cents per copy. At this price, staff felt confindent
they could provide a business case for it. Projected annual cost of $21,164 less the current
consummable cost of $7600 which is now included means a net incremental cost to TRCA of
$13,564 yearly. Labour savings amount to $5000 yearly which means a total cost of $8,564
yearly. If the Authority prints beyond its current yearly volume of 600,000 copies, additional
savings will accrue.
The lease provides for purchase of upgraded equipment. Given rapid change in technology, it
is important to be able to shift to new product lines before equipment is dated or obsolete.
SUMMARY
Staff have talked to the users who will get quicker service and a better product. As a result,
they are willing to pay a premium for the printing and are willing to absorb the additional costs.
The additional costs still allows for a 50% savings over outside printers. Prices have also been
frozen for five years.
At the end of the 5 year lease, the Authority can purchase the equipment for $10, buy into a
maintenance plan and purchase consumables.
Report prepared by: John Annunziello, extension 5272
For Information contact: John Annunziello, extension 5272
Date: October 17, 2002
NEW BUSINESS
RES.#B143/02 -
Moved by:
Seconded by:
SANDRINGHAM PLACE INC.
Irene Jones
Lorna Bissell
692
THAT before the permit Is issued for CFN 33497, Metrus Development provide a signed
commitment to supervise the installation and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures as specified in the approved permit drawings to ensure there will be no
further negative impacts to the adjacent watercourse as a result of proposed works.
CARRIED
NEW BUSINESS
RES.#B144/02 -
Moved by:
Seconded by:
CITYSCAPE DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Maria Augimeri
Irene Jones
THAT protocols with City of Toronto and TRCA be developed, related to flood protection
options for the Gooderham & Worts site, with consideration of the following:
1. appropriate flood protection measures given the historical constraints & issues
around liability;
2. finalizing construction of the berm for the Lower Don Lands;
AND FURTHER THAT the protocol be put into place before issuing the permit to
Cityscape Development Corp.
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 11:36 a.m., on November 1, 2002.
Dick O'Brien J. Craig Mather
Chair Secretary- Treasurer
/ks
693
CARRIED
ti
THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #11/02
December 6, 2002
The Executive Committee Meeting #11/02, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek
Pioneer Village, on Friday, December 6, 2002. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting
to order at 10:27 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Member
Lorna Bissell Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
REGRETS
Ron Moeser
RES. #B145 /02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #10/02, held on November 1, 2002, be approved.
DELEGATIONS
Member
CARRIED
(a) Mr. Tony Paginton of 3 Lakeshore Drive, Toronto, speaking in regards to shoreline
improvement work at 2 to 4 Sand Beach Road, Etobicoke.
RES. #B146 /02 - DELEGATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Jim McMaster
THAT above -noted delegation (a) be heard and received;
694
AND FURTHER THAT the issue be referred to staff for a report to the Watershed
Management Advisory Board on February 14, 2002 in regards to Mr. Paginton's concerns,
as well as the status of ownership of the property and whether the completed work is in
compliance with the permit issued.
CARRIED
HEARING PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158
RES. #B147/02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THAT the Committee sit as a Hearing Board.
CARRIED
MEMBERS PRESENT FOR HEARING:
Maria Augimeri Member
Lorna Bissell Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
Following the roll call, a hearing was held re:
Application #162/02 /MARK for permit, under Ontario Regulation 158, by Mr. & Mrs. I.
Ancuta for permission to place approximately 350 cubic metres of fill on Part of Lot 26,
Concession 6 (10809 Kennedy Road), Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed. The fill
has already been placed in violation of Ontario Regulation 158.
The applicants propose to place approximately 350 cubic metres of fill in a Fill Regulated Area
and Regional Storm Rood Plain of the Rouge River. The fill was already placed in the spring of
2001 in violation of Ontario Regulation 158. On March 4, 2002, court proceedings gave the
applicant the option of either removing the fill or seeking a permit from the Authority. The
applicant has submitted a permit application to Authority staff to keep the fill in place. Staff do
not support the application on the basis that it will affect the control of flooding.
A written staff report was submitted and a presentation was made by Ms. Mary-Ann Burns,
Plans Analyst, York Region, Development Services Section.
A presentation was made by Mr. Phil Biggin, Union of Injured Workers, and Mrs. Rodica
Ancuta, applicant.
The Board asked questions of staff and the applicant.
695
RES. #B148 /02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Jim McMaster
THAT the Hearing Board move into closed session before the applicants summation, with
no objection from the applicant or her agent.
RES. #8149/02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
CARRIED
THAT the Hearing Board arise from closed session and hear the applicants summation.
CARRIED
RES. #B150 /02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Jim McMaster
THAT the Hearing Board consider this matter in closed session.
RES. #B151 /02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT the Hearing Board arise and report from closed session
DECISION OF THE HEARING BOARD
RES. #8152/02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Jim McMaster
CARRIED
CARRIED
THAT application #162/02 /MARK by Mr. & Mrs. I. Ancuta pursuant to Ontario Regulation
158, to place approximately 350 cubic metres of fill in a Fill Regulated Area and Regional
Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River, on Part of Lot 26, Concession 6 (10809 Kennedy
Road), Town of Markham, be refused as it affects the control of flooding.
CARRIED
696
MOTION TO RECONVENE
RES. #B153 /02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT the Executive Committee Meeting reconvene.
MOTION TO RATIFY
RES. #8154/02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Lorna Bissell
CARRIED
THAT the Executive Committee ratify the Decision of the Hearing Board that application
#162/02 /MARK by Mr. & Mrs. 1. Ancuta pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, to place
approximately 350 cubic metres of fill in a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Flood
Plain of the Rouge River, on Part of Lot 26, Concession 6 (10809 Kennedy Road), Town of
Markham, be refused as it affects the control of flooding.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed
in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a regional
storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river,
creek, stream or watercourse.
A permit may be refused if, in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of
flooding or pollution is affected. Before refusing permission, the Authority must hold a Hearing
to which the applicant is a party.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The subject property is located on the east side of Kennedy Road, north of Elgin Mills Road,
north of the Bruce Creek (a tributary of the Rouge River). The property contains a single family
residence and a garage. Approximately half of the property is within the Regional Storm Flood
Plain; all of the property is within the Fill Regulated Area. The placed fill is inside the southern
limit of the property along an existing driveway which leads to the garage. Both the garage
and the driveway are within the flood plain.
697
PROPOSAL
The proposal is to keep fill that was placed on the property in place. The fill is located along
the southern edge of the property's driveway, and is estimated to total 350 cubic metres. It has
the effect of raising grade by approximately 1 to 1.5 metres (3 to 5 feet) to match the grade of
the remainder of the driveway portion to the north. Essentially, the fill has the effect of
widening the property's driveway. The fill is estimated to cover an area of 195 square metres
(2,100 square feet).
CHRONOLOGY
The application was made pursuant to court proceedings that took place in March 2002.
These proceedings obtained a conditional removal order for the fill by August 1, 2002; the
condition was that the removal order would be stayed if the applicants received permit
approval from the Authority regarding the (offending) fill placement.
A permit application was received by the Authority's Development Services Staff on April 16,
2002. The application was submitted with a copy of the Authority's Flood and Fill line mapping
on which the applicant had indicated the area of the fill placement, and also indicated two other
areas proposed for moving the fill to. A letter was also submitted, describing the proposal to
remove some of the fill that was placed, to another area of the lot not situated in the flood plain,
and to remove the remainder of the fill to an adjacent property (a cemetery, also not situated in
the flood plain). Subsequent to this, the proposal was not pursued any further by the applicant
and the application was kept on file.
On June 28, 2002, Development Services staff met with the applicant, Mrs. R. Ancuta, at her
residence on the subject property. At that meeting, Mrs. Ancuta explained the drainage
problems her lot experiences during rainfall and that she was hoping the fill placed on her
property would help to resolve this problem, but it had not. She also explained that she was
not sure that moving the fill, as proposed in her permit application, to another area of the
property would solve her drainage problems either. It was agreed between staff and the
applicant that the applicant would pursue having the fill removed in order to comply with the
court order, and that she would contact York Region and the Town of Markham Works
Departments (and possibly an engineer) to determine how the property's drainage problems
could best be solved. Staff also explained to the applicant that her permit application was
incomplete because it only contained a location map and a written description. Staff
explained, and subsequently faxed, a list of requirements for a complete permit application, ie.
a topographic survey with existing and proposed elevations indicated, as well as a sediment
control and restoration plans.
On July 24, 2002, Development Services staff met with the applicant at the Authority head
office, at the applicants request. At that meeting, the applicant submitted additional letters and
copies of fill and flood line mapping highlighting the subject property and the limit of the
regional storm flood plain. The letters explained that Mrs. Ancuta had believed that a permit
issued to the previous owner of her property was still applicable, and that paying for fill removal
would be difficult. Not being confident that she would be able to have the fill removed by the
deadline (August 1, 2002), she enquired if the courts would grant her an extension.
698
On October 3, 2002, Development Services staff received a letter from the applicant proposing
to leave the fill on the property. The reasons the letter gave to support the proposal were that
the fill was not meant to extend the amount of developable land, and was only an effort to solve
drainage problems. The letter also explained that the fill that was placed, would not be at risk
of creating sediment that would enter the watercourse. A second letter was also attached,
authored by the previous owner of the property, stating that the property did not experience
flooding during Hurricane Hazel.
In considering the applicant's latest proposal for leaving the fill in the flood plain, Development
Services staff reviewed updated flood plain elevations with Authority Engineering staff, to
confirm that the fill placed was still in an area subject to flooding. This was confirmed to still be
the case, and in fact, the updates for elevations in this area revealed an even higher Regional
Storm Flood Elevation; even more of the property was in the flood plain, including the area of
fill placement.
On October 25, 2002, Development Services Staff sent a letter to the applicant, informing her
that we could not recommend approval of her application for leaving the fill in the flood plain.
Excerpts from the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program were included
in the letter, in order to document to the applicant how Authority policy does not permit fill
placement in the flood plain. The letter also explained that Hurricane Hazel was centred over
the Humber River and that the subject property is adjacent to the Rouge River. It was also
stated that TRCA's flood plain mapping is based on modelling that assumes a Hurricane
Hazel -type storm event, centred over each of the watersheds draining into Lake Ontario,
including the Rouge River.
Staffs letter also explained our consideration of the TRCA permit granted to the previous
owners of her property, Mr. And Mrs. Clarence Powell, for placing six Toads of fill in the flood
plain. It was stated that permits are not transferrable between property owners, and that Mr.
Powell's application was approved in consideration of his personal physical challenge (he
required the use of canes for walking), and to permit vehicular access to the rear of the house.
In addition, the current owners' violation consisted of an estimated forty loads of fill placed in
the flood plain. The cumulative impact of this fill with the first six loads already in place, would
only serve to contribute to greater negative impacts on the storage and conveyance of flood
waters, for both this property and adjacent properties.
It was confirmed by telephone with the applicant that she wished staff to bring the application
to the Executive Committee, despite our recommendation of refusal.
TRCA POLICY CONTEXT AND EVALUATION OF FLOOD PLAIN IMPACT
TRCA's policies do not support the placement of fill in the regulatory flood plain given potential
impacts to the conveyance of flood flows and loss of flood storage. This policy is stated in
Section 3.2.2 C) of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (October
1994), as shown in the excerpt below:
Alteration of stream corridors (defined as the regulatory flood plain plus 10 metres), through
activities such as filling, enclosure or channelization, shall not be permitted to create additional
useable area and /or to accommodate development other than (1) in a flood spill zone, or (2) in
an unusually wide flood plain with shallow depths of infrequent flooding. (p. 20)
699
TRCA's engineering staff have confirmed that the flood plain on the subject property is neither
a flood spill zone or a wide, shallow flood plain.
In addition, when evaluating impacts on the control of flooding, the Authority considers both
the incremental and cumulative impacts related to the Toss of flood storage. Some of the
impacts that can be expected from loss of flood storage are increased flood flows, changes in
the frequency and therefore, risk of flooding, and an increase in the risk to loss of life and
property. On a cumulative basis, the proposal is not supported by policy because it
contributes to the impact created by the cumulative loss of flood storage.
SUMMARY
The applicant's proposal is to permit fill placed in the Regional Storm Flood Plain to remain. It
is staff's opinion that the proposal has the potential to increase flood levels on the basis of the
impact associated with the cumulative loss of flood storage. This type of incremental filling can
affect the conveyance of flood flows and loss of flood storage for the subject property and
adjacent properties within the same watershed.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend that the application be refused as it will affect the control of flooding in the
following ways:
• it has the potential to affect the control of flooding upstream and downstream through the
cumulative loss of flood storage; and,
• it does not comply with Section 3.2.2 C) of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program, which states that filling within stream corridors (flood plain plus 10
metres) shall not be permitted to create additional useable area.
Report prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: November 22, 2002
Attachments: 1
700
Attachment 1
701
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #B155/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffin Creek Watershed
Granville Patrick Harcourt Vernon and Deborah Perry Harcourt Vernon,
CFN 32686. Purchase of a conservation easement, located east of
Concession Road 6, north of the Uxbridge- Pickering Town Line,
Township of Uxbridge, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection &
Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", floodplain and conservation component,
Duffin Creek.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Maria Augimeri
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the
protection of the environmental features and functions containing approximately 4.372
hectares (10.80 acres), of vacant land be purchased from Granville Patrick Harcourt
Vernon and Deborah Perry Harcourt Vernon, said land being Part of Lot 6, Concession 6,
being parts 1, 2, & 3 on Reference Plan 40R -5671, Township of Uxbridge, in the Regional
Municipality of Durham, on the east side of Concession Road 6, north of the
Uxbridge- Pickering Town Line;
THAT the acquisition of the conservation easement is to be on the following basis;
(a) The purchase price be $2.00;
(b) An Income tax receipt is to be made available to Granville Patrick Harcourt Vernon
and Deborah Perry Harcourt Vernon for the appraised value of the easement in
accordance with the guidelines set out by Canada Customs and Revenue Agency;
(c) The Authority is responsible for appraisal and reasonable legal fees.
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred Incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005.
702
Granville Patrick Harcourt Vernon and Deborah Perry Harcourt Vernon have been excellent
environmental stewards of their property and have indicated to the Authority their desire to
provide long term protection for the environmental features but at the same time retain
ownership. The property is improved with a detached single family dwelling, tennis court,
inground swimming pool and wood and metal sheds. It was felt that a conservation easement
would be the best tool to provide long term protection to the resource while permitting the
owners to enjoy their property. The negotiated conservation easement will restrict the owner of
the property from creating severances, placing fill, constructing golf courses, altering
watercourses, and will permit the Authority to carry out compliance monitoring and remove and
dispose of unapproved development.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property is located north of the Uxbridge- Pickering Town Line, on the east side of
Concession Road 6, in the Township of Uxbridge, on the Oak Ridges Moraine. It is improved
with a detached single family dwelling, tennis court, inground swimming pool and wood and
metal sheds. The property is in the vicinity of the Authority's holdings in the Glen Major area.
The property is within a significant headwater area in the Duffins Creek Watershed and is a
candidate ESA site. The acquisition of a conservation easement will provide long -term
protection from development and this property will help consolidate the protection of the
resource features provided by the Authority holdings in the area.
This approach to land securement is supported and being advocated by the Conservation
Authorities Moraine Coalition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
All costs including appraisals and legal fees are to be charged to account 004 -11. Property
maintenance is the responsibility of the registered owner. There will be some minor costs to
the Authority associated with administering the easement.
Report prepared by: Tom Campitelli, extension 5335
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Tom Campitelli, extension 5335
Date: November 26, 2002
Attachments: 1
703
Attachment 1
fi
RE:
„ -
N4TuR4.OEMTA, LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT;20h2b05 —
fta4.0,3
Flood ,PloilittanWenn*oryallon Component, puffin einsOiattfi t
ll
Granette Pid*NereOuititernen andDleboran Pe Milt mosa'Pn0PEnlY 4
Vernon
CFN 32686
k-11
r '1
704
RES. #B156/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffin Creek Watershed
Aileen Dancey, CFN 33572. Purchase of a conservation easement,
located on the south west corner of Westney Road and the
Uxbridge- Pickering Town Line, City of Pickering, under the "Natural
Heritage Lands Protection & Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005 ", floodplain
and conservation component, Duffin Creek.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Maria Augimeri
Irene Jones
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT a conservation easement for the
protection of the environmental features and functions containing approximately 14.18
hectares (35.05 acres), of vacant land be purchased from Aileen Dancey, said land being
Part of Lot 11, Concession 9, City of Pickering, in the Regional Municipality of Durham,
on the south west corner of Westney Road and the Uxbridge- Pickering Town Line;
THAT the acquisition of the conservation easement is to be on the following basis;
(a) The purchase price be $2.00;
(b) An income tax receipt is to be made available to Aileen Dancey for the appraised
value of the easement in accordance with the guidelines set out by Canada Customs
and Revenue Agency;
(c) The Authority is responsible for appraisal and reasonable legal fees.
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231 /00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000, approved the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 -2005.
705
Aileen Dancey has been an excellent environmental steward of her property and has indicated
to the Authority her desire to provide long term protection for the environmental features but at
the same time retain ownership. The property is improved with a detached single family
dwelling with attached garage, inground swimming pool, tennis court and a wood shed. Much
of the property has been reforested by the owner. It was felt that a conservation easement
would be the best tool to provide long term protection to the resource while permitting the
owner to enjoy her property. The negotiated conservation easement will restrict the owner of
the property from creating severances, placing fill, constructing golf courses, altering
watercourses, and will permit the Authority to carry out compliance monitoring and remove and
dispose of unapproved development.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
RATIONALE
The subject property is located on the south west corner of Westney Road and the
Uxbridge- Pickering Town Line, City of Pickering, on the Oak Ridges Moraine. It is improved
with a detached single family dwelling with attached garage, inground swimming pool, tennis
court and a wood shed. The property is in the vicinity of the Authority's holdings in the Glen
Major area. The property contains spectacular Oak Ridges Moraine topography and is a
candidate ESA site. The acquisition of a conservation easement will provide long -term
protection from development and this property will help consolidate the protection of the
resource features provided by the Authority holdings in the area.
This approach to land securement is supported and being advocated by the Conservation
Authorities Moraine Coalition.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
All costs including appraisals and legal fees are to be charged to account 004 -11. Property
maintenance is the responsibility of the registered owner. There will be some minor costs to
the Authority associated with administering the easement.
Report prepared by: Tom Campitelll, extension 5335
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245, Tom Campitelll, extension 5335
Date: November 26, 2002
Attachments: 1
706
Attachment 1
RE
NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Duffin Creek Watershed
PROJECT, 2001-2005
Aileen Dancey
CFN 33572
'. 1,,,...._, .s:,.
stnativrnorii'rrie, - '1. ' A7-1,, ' ---,
.,„
-:--,,,,,,, • -, ' - - - i ' \-.,
l
-_,- ..,'„ .
• i' ,
„....,, „. ,_, 0„..„• -,...„ , , '' • . - _
,,,,,,r-ii
''-' 'I
\'-- ...- -,, / ' -z.._._ - - , _ ..t(-1
A
'--„I I
!I 0 , v , 1 ,,
\ - criA TRCA LANDS
aim SUBJECT PROKRTY
,...........-
707
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES.#B157/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Maria Augimeri
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(9.1.1 - 9.1.12, inclusive, and 9.1.28 - Estate of E. Orde Tuff), which are listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF TORONTO (EAST YORK COMMUNITY)
9.1.1 490 KING ST. EAST LTD.
To place fill within a regulated area on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, Plan D -228, (476 - 490
King Street East), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don
River Watershed as located on the property owned by 490 King St. East Ltd..
The purpose is to construct twelve 31 /2 storey rowhouses with backyards and detached
garages on the property located on the north side of King Street East, between Sumach Street
and Ashby Place in the Don watershed at 476 King St E, 480 King St E, and 490 King St E..
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2007 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Plan of Survey of Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7 Registered Plan D -228 City of Toronto by
Holding Jones Vanderveen Inc, Ontario Land Surveyors 1700 Langstaff Roads, Suite
1002 Vaughan, ON printed November 1, 2002 received November 7, 2002.
• Plan of Topography of Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7 Registered Plan D -228 City of Toronto by
Holding Jones Vanderveen Inc, Ontario Land Surveyors 1700 Langstaff Roads, Suite
1002 Vaughan, ON dated May 27, 2002 received November 7, 2002.
• Site Plan Al Townhouse Project 474 -496 King St. E. & Sumach Street Toronto, Ontario
by Turner Fleischer Architects Inc. dated June 21, 2002 received Nov 7, 2002.
708
• Landscape Plan L1 King & Sumach Street Townhouses 490 King Street East Toronto,
Ontario, Rashmi M. Nathwani by Strybos Associates Ltd. Landscape Architects dated
July 8, 2002 received Nov 7, 2002.
• Site Servicing and Grading Plan 476 - 490 King Street East by Sernas Associates 141
Brunel Road Mississauga, ON dated June 2002 received November 7, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct twelve 31/2 storey rowhouses with backyards and detached
garages on the property located on the north side of King Street East, between Sumach Street
and Ashby Place in the Don watershed at 476 King St E, 480 King St E, and 490 King St E. The
proposed works are partially within the Fill Regulated Area and are located within the Lower
Don SPA. However, the works are situated outside of the floodpiain and are setback a
distance of approximately 350 m from the Don River. The proposed works are contained within
the developed street system and are consistent with the surrounding streetscape.
Control of Flooding:
The works are not within the Regional Storm Floodplain and are set back sufficiently from the
Don River. As a result there will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
Sediment control fencing will be erected around the entire construction area as a result the
work will not impact the watercourse or surrounding land.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is located within a highly urbanized area surrounded by both commercial
and residential developments. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues evident at this
site. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.2 G - Infilling of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33727
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: November 12, 2002
Application #: 425/02/TOR
9.1.2 BMW CANADA INC.
To construct in a flood plain on Lot P, Concession FRONT , (1 Sunlight Park Road),
in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by BMW Canada Inc..
709
The purpose is to partially demolish, renovate and add to an existing building in order to
construct a new BMW dealership on the property located at 1 Sunlight Park Road in the lower
Don Watershed in the City of Toronto.
The permit will be issued for the period of to in accordance with the following documents and
plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan A101 for Toronto BMW 1 Sunlight Park Road Toronto Ontario prepared by
Quadrangle Architect Limited 380 Wellington St. W., Toronto, Ontario dated
September 18, 2002 received September 25, 2002.
• Partial Ground Floor Plan A201a for Toronto BMW 1 Sunlight Park Road Toronto,
Ontario prepared by Quadrangle Architect Limited 380 Wellington St. W., Toronto,
Ontario dated November 6, 2002 received November 7, 2002.
• Partial Ground Floor Plan A201 b for Toronto BMW 1 Sunlight Park Road Toronto,
Ontario prepared by Quadrangle Architect Limited 380 Wellington St. W., Toronto,
Ontario dated November 6, 2002 received November 7, 2002.
• Landscape Plan L -1 for Downtown BMW Sunlight Toronto, Ontario City of Toronto
prepared by The MBTW Group Community Planning Urban Design Landscape
Architecture 240 Duncan Mill Road Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario dated April 12, 2002
received September 25, 2002.
• Details D -1 for Downtown BMW Sunlight Toronto, Ontario City of Toronto prepared by
The MBTW Group Community Planning Urban Design Landscape Architecture 240
Duncan Mill Road Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario dated April 12, 2002 received September
25, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to partially demolish, renovate and add to an existing building in order to
construct a new BMW dealership located at 1 Sunlight Park Road located in the Don
Watershed. The property is east of the Don River and is separated from the watercourse by
the Don Valley Parkway. The site is within the Lower Don Specially Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
The works are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and as such must meet the
minimum 350 year elevation and withstand the flood depths and velocities associated with a
Regional Storm event. The submitted plans illustrate that the final floor elevation for the
proposed BMW dealership is 78.9m (a.s.l) located 0.20m above the 1:350 year flood elevation.
The proposed dealership has also been designed to withstand the flood depths and velocities
associated with the Regional Storm event (3.4 m/s and 1.2m). In addition, the proposed
development meets all ingress and egress requirements.
In addition, a portion of the BMW property may be required to undertake the comprehensive
flood protection strategy for the Lower Don River. This portion is approximately 20 metres
inland from the western edge of the property. TRCA staff are securing a conservation easement
which would grant access to the Authority to undertake any necessary flood remedial works.
710
The location of possible flood remedial works will be utilized for landscaping, stormwater
treatment and parking and will not contain any structural works. The conservation easement
requirement is secured through the site plan agreement.
Pollution:
There is no excavation planned on the site which is more than 50 metres from the Don River.
The site is fenced and the works will not affect the control of pollution. The proposed design
includes a naturalization scheme and an acceptable stormwater management scheme.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is located within an urbanized portion of the downtown area. There are no
slope stability /geotechnical issues evident at this site. No significant resource features will be
impacted by the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.1 B, Development Guidelines for Development/
Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33223
Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: May 16, 2002
Application #: 192/02/TOR
9.1.3 CITY OF TORONTO
To construct in a flood plain on (67 Pottery Road), in the City of Toronto (East York
Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned
by The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to remove the existing sewage pumping station and construct a new pumping
station at Todmorden Mills, located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Hydraulic Profile, Mechanical Plans and Sections, Plan and Section -
Structural, Electrical - Single Line and Details, Electrical - Loop Wiring and Plans,
Electrical - RPU Panel Layout and Wiring, Dwg. Nos. GI, G2, M1, Si, El, E2, and E3,
prepared by AWS Engineers & Planners Corp., date received October 24, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
711
Proposal:
The proposal is to remove the existing below ground sewage pumping station which is
deteriorating and to replace it with a new below ground pumping station at Todmorden Mills.
The new station will be built at a similar elevation as the existing station, with the cap of the
chamber being raised 450 mm above grade, similar to the existing station, however the vent
pipe will be raised slightly higher than the existing, permitting the new station to be Tess flood
susceptible. Since the entire site is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, it is
impossible to locate the pumping station outside the floodplain.
Control of Flooding:
Both the existing and proposed new pumping station are located within the Regional Storm
Floodplain, within a backwater area having low velocities. The new pumping station will be
less flood susceptible than the existing station, since the vent opening will be situated at a
higher elevation.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented on the site and maintained during
the construction project to ensure that construction - generated sediment does not enter the
watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The Don Valley Parkway separates the Todmorden Mills site from the Don River, which is
located approximately 100 metres to the west. However, the entire site is located within the
Regional Storm Floodplain, within a backwater area. The proposed new pumping station will
be replacing the existing deteriorating pumping station, and will be both more efficient and less
flood vulnerable than the existing station, as the vent opening will be situated at a higher
elevation. No significant resource features will be affected by the proposed works and all
disturbed areas will be restored. There are no fisheries or geotechnical issues related to this
project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - and Section 4.2.2(D) -
Replacement Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33718
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: November 6, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
Application #: 422/02/TOR
9.1.4 SUSAN BITONDO
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 7, Plan 3919, (2 PenhaleDrive), in the City
of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Susan Bitondo.
712
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Fill Regulated area of the Humber Creek, a
tributary of the Humber River, in order to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming
pool and rear /side addition to the existing dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan - Proposed Inground Pool and Rear /Side Addition, prepared by David
Easser, received by TRCA on November 5, 2002, redline revised November 21, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is located adjacent to the Humber Creek valley corridor, and is located
partially within the Fill Regulated area. The proposed works involve excavation and regrading
of fill in order to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool and rear /side addition
to the existing dwelling. The rear portion of the property falls within the Chapman Valley
Environmentally Significant Area (ESA). However, all works are outside and setback more than
15 metres from the Chapman Valley ESA, on the cleared portion of the subject property.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, and therefore will
not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected to occur from the proposed works. All work is to be confined to
the tableland which is located approximately 35 metres from the watercourse. All excavated
material will be removed from site.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored following construction. The proposed works are setback
approximately 15 metres from the top -of -bank. All works are outside and sufficiently setback
from the ESA, on the cleared portion of the subject property. The proposed works are
consistent with existing development in the corridor reach and no slope stability /geotechnical
issues are associated with the project. No significant resource features will be impacted by the
proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures and Section 4.2.- Existing Development, of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33716
Report Prepared by: Kellie McCormack, extension 5269
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: November 6, 2002
713
Application #: 421/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY)
9.1.5 ED MICHELI
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10, Plan 2069, (49 Wentworth Avenue), in
the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Ed Michell.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to
facilitate the installation of an inground swimming pool and a 0.6 m (2 ft) high landscaping
retaining wall structure on the tableland portion of the site.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -lined Revised Site Plan and Cross - Sectional Drawing, submitted by applicant,
date received November 26, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to
facilitate the installation of an inground swimming pool and a 0.6 m (2 ft) high landscaping
retaining wall structure on the tableland portion of the site.
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located above the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the proposed
works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from
entering the watercourse which is located approximately 80 metres away.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed pool and retaining wall will maintain a 20 metre setback from the top of bank of
the valley slope. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor
reach and are not expected to impact on any significant resource features. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
714
CFN: 33767
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: November 26, 2002
Application #: 438/02/TOR
9.1.6 SERGE TRIVANOVICH
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10, Plan 2069, (43 Wentworth Avenue), in
the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Serge Trivanovich.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to
facilitate the installation of an inground swimming pool.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Lot Drainage & House Siting Control Plan submitted by applicant,
date received November 15, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to
facilitate the installation of an inground swimming pool.
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located above the Regional Storm floodplain, therefore the proposed
works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from
entering the watercourse which is located approximately 80 metres away.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed pool will maintain a minimum 10 metre setback from the top of bank of the valley
slope and is located behind the building setback line established by TRCA staff for slope
stability purposes. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the
corridor reach and are not expected to impact on any significant resource features. There are
no slope stability /geotechncal issues associated with the proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
715
CFN: 33717
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: November 6, 2002
TOWN OF AJAX
Application #: 420/02/TOR
9.1.7 REGION OF DURHAM
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Lot 6, Concession 1 , (Salem Road South - from Bayly Street northward to Achilles
Road), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property
owned by Region of Durham.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill for Salem Road South roadworks and to alter a
watercourse during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through the dam and
pump installation of a temporary culvert crossing on a tributary of the Carruthers Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Sheets 1 of 13, Cover -Salem Road South from Bayly to Achilles; Sheet 6 of 13,
REM -1 -from South Limit of Removals -Sta. 8 +907 to Sta. 9 +275; Sheet 7 of 13,
REM- 2 -Sta. 9 +275 to 9 +741.75, North Limit of Removals; Sheet 8 of 13, R -1 -from
South Limit of Contract -Sta. 8 +907 to 9 +025; Sheet 9 of 13, R -2 -from Sta. 9 +025 to
Sta. 9 +275; Sheet 10 of 13, R -3 from 9 +275 to 9 +525; Sheet 11 of 13, R-4 from Sta
9 +525 to Sta. 9 +741.75; Sheet 13 of 13, TX- 1- Typical Cut and Fill Sections; all dated
October 18, 2002; all received October 21, 2002; prepared by Chisholm, Fleming and
Associates, Consulting Engineers.
• Sheet 12 of 23, R -5- General Notes and Schematic for Temporary Culvert; November
4, 2002; received November 4, 2002; prepared by Chisholm, Fleming and Associates.
• Ontario Provincial Standard Drawings; 219.110 -Light Duty Silt Fence Barrier;
219.180 -Straw Bale Flow Check; 220.01- Barrier for Tree Protection; Bailey
Bridge- Sketch 1; received October 21, 2002; submitted by Chisholm, Fleming and
Associates.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves fill excavation and placement for clearing and grubbing as well as a
balanced cut and fill along the proposed Salem Road alignment from Bayly Street in the south
to Achilles Road in the north. In addition, a temporary watercourse crossing of Carruthers
Creek will be constructed through one of three methods to be chosen by the contractor: bailey
bridge, concrete culvert or flat bed trailers. The bailey bridge and the flat bed trailer options
will not alter the watercourse. The watercourse would be altered temporarily during the dam
and pump installation of the 10m x 1200 diameter culvert option. Since the Highway 401
716
Interchange to the north is three months ahead of schedule, the Region of Durham will be
tendering this "Advance Contract" for earthworks in December to allow the roadway fill
embankment to settle for a period of four months. The Region has another permit submission
which involves the permanent watercourse crossing, road construction and restoration. TRCA
staff commented on Salem Road South (formerly Carruthers Creek Drive) during the
Environmental Assessment process. Portions of Salem Road South are located within a Fill
Regulated Area and a Regional Storm Floodplain.
Control of Flooding:
Since the proposed watercourse crossings either by bailey bridge, culvert or flat bed trailers
are temporary in nature, staff do not have concerns for impacts to flood storage or
conveyance. The balanced cut and fill calculations have been reviewed by staff and it has
been determined that there will be no impacts to flood storage or conveyance.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, check dams) will be implemented to ensure that
the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The restoration of the site will be completed with the ensuing permit for the completion of the
roadworks. There will be in stream works associated with this project if the culvert installation
method is chosen. Since the works are temporary in nature, the works are viewed as a
mitigatable Harmful Alteration, Disruption and Destruction of fish habitat and a Letter of Advice
will be issued pending Executive Committee approval.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33675
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: November 26, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 405 /02 /AJAX
9.1.8 KIDKARE HOLDINGS INC.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 10, Concession 5, (4101 and 4111
Highway 7), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Kidkare Holdings Inc..
The purpose is to place fill within a regulated area consisting of one 300 cubic metre stockpile
of red clay baseball surface material, to be stored temporarily (December 2002 to June 2003)
in an existing outside storage yard.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
717
• Plan View, date received October 29, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to temporarily store one 300 cubic metre stockpile of red clay surface material
in an existing outside storage area of a contractor's yard. The stockpile will be contained within
existing concrete partitions outlining an area of approximately 1,200 square feet. Between
December 2002 until June 2003, the material will be taken off site in increments in order to
surface the Town of Markham's baseball diamond facilities. The material will be removed in its
entirety by the end of June 2003.
Control of Flooding:
The material will not be situated within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, and therefore the
control of flooding will not be affected.
Pollution:
The stockpiled material will be situated more than 100 metres from the watercourse and will be
contained within existing concrete partitions, so that no sediment will enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to this proposal and no natural heritage
features will be affected.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.2.2 E), Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33750
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: November 20, 2002
Application #: 430 /02 /MARK
9.1.9 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 9, Concession 7, (Milne Reservoir - southeast of
Highway 7 and Markham Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York.
The purpose is to construct a temporary access road within the Regional Storm Flood Plain
and Milne Creek, in order to access a leaking manhole of the York Durham sanitary sewer line.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
718
• Milne Reservoir Manhole MD -07W Repair, date received November 17, 2002.
• Manhole MD -07W Profile, date received November 17, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a temporary access road within the Regional Storm Flood Plain
and Milne Creek, in order to repair a leaking manhole of the York Durham sanitary sewer line.
The proposal was permitted to proceed as emergency works. Authority staff were on site to
ensure that the works were taking place in accordance with Authority policies.
Control of Flooding:
The access road was located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain on a temporary basis and
has now been removed completely, so that the control of flooding will not be affected.
Pollution:
A sediment and erosion control plan, accepted by staff, was implemented on site during
construction, to minimize sediment in the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical issues related to the works and no significant natural heritage
features were affected by the work. The access road was completely removed and the site
was stabilized and restored to its original condition. Staff informed the Department of Fisheries
and Oceans (DFO) of the emergency works and how they were being carried out. DFO
determined that their Authorization was not required because the works had already taken
place.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33703
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: October 31, 2002
Application #: 413 /02 /MARK
9.1.10 STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES
To construct in a flood plain (7277 Bayview Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Don
River Watershed as located on the property owned by George and Iris Brown.
The purpose is to construct structure in the Regional Storm Flood Plain consisting of a
replacement pedestrian bridge over the Don River on an existing single family residential lot;
the original pedestrian bridge was destroyed by a fallen tree.
719
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing No. 1, General Arrangement, prepared by Barker Terp Gibson Limited, dated
November 20, 2002, date received November 22, 2002 - redline revised for a silt fence.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a pedestrian bridge over the Don River on an existing single family
residential lot. The prefabricated bridge will be placed on the existing stable footings left from
the original pedestrian bridge. The original bridge was destroyed by a large fallen tree. The
bridge is used for the residents of the property to gain pedestrian access to the portion of their
backyard on the opposite side of the watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain but staff have
determined that impacts to the control of flooding will be negligible.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be placed along the limit of construction and the equipment access route, in
order prevent sediment from entering the watercourse. The prefabricated bridge will be swung
out onto the existing footings, so that the only equipment in the watercourse needed to carry
out the works, will be a scaffold.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with this project and no significant
natural heritage features will be affected. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored
with native, non - invasive shrubs and seed mix.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33743
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: November 19, 2002
Application #: 429 /02 /MARK
9.1.11 WISMER COMMONS DEVELOPERS GROUP C/O ANISON MANAGEMENT
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Lot 16, 17, Concession 7 , (Highway 48), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Wynberry Developments Inc..
720
The purpose is to replace the existing culvert below Highway 48 to connect a new stormwater
management pond (Pond 6) to an existing stormwater management pond (Mount Joy Pond)
which outlets to Exhibition Creek, in order to service draft approved residential subdivisions in
the Wismer Commons Planning area of Markham.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2007 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing No. SC -1, Siltation Control Plan SWM Pond 6, prepared by Schaeffers
Consulting Engineers, dated September 11, 2002, date received October 21, 2002.
• Sheet No. D1, Mount Joy Pond Outfall Restoration, dated October 1, 2002, date
received October 21, 2002.
• Sheet No. P1, Pond 6 Restoration Planting, dated November 25, 2002, date received
November 25, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to replace the existing culvert underneath Highway 48 in order to connect a
new stormwater management pond on the west side of the highway, with an existing
stormwater management pond on the east side of the highway. The existing pond currently
outlets into Exhibition Creek. The new pond and outfall connection will service draft approved
residential plans of subdivision already accepted by staff through the planning application
review process. The permit application for this servicing fulfills a condition of draft approval
issued by Authority staff as part of their review of the subdivisions. The servicing is in
compliance with the stormwater management scheme already accepted by staff under the
same subdivision review.
Control of Flooding:
The outfall connection extends partially into the Regional Storm Flood Plain, however, staff
have determined that there will be no impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
A sediment and erosion control plan will be implemented on site for the duration of the works
as reviewed and accepted by staff, in order to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with the proposal and no significant
natural heritage features will be affected. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored
with planting in accordance with Authority landscaping guidelines.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
721
CFN: 32782.B
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: January 7, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 012 /02 /MARK
9.1.12 EDGEPORT HOME CORPORATION
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 56, Concession 1, (East
of Yonge Street), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located
on the property owned by Edgeport Home Corporation.
The purpose is to construct a stormwater outfall to the Rouge valley in order to service a draft
approved residential plan of subdivision (19T- 99003).
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2007 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Drawing No. SC -1, Sediment Control Plan, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting
Engineers, date received September 3, 2002.
• Drawing No. SC -2, Sediment Control Details, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting
Engineers, date received September 3, 2002.
• Drawing No. PP -1, Escapade Drive, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers,
date received September 3, 2002.
• Drawing No. BP -1, 10.0m Buffer Restoration Planting, prepared by MBTW Group, date
received September 3, 2002.
• Drawing No. D -1, Plant List and Details, prepared by MBTW Group, date received
September 3, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a stormwater outfall to outlet to the valley of the Rouge River in
order to service a draft approved plan of residential subdivision (Town File No. 19T- 99003).
The proposal satisfies a condition of draft approval issued by Authority staff. The outfall is in
compliance with the servicing scheme accepted by Authority staff for the subdivision.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and therefore there
will be no impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
A sediment and erosion control plan accepted by staff will be implemented for the duration of
construction, in order to prevent sediment from entering the valley or the watercourse.
722
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues related to the proposal. No significant natural
heritage features will be affected by the proposal and all disturbed areas will be stabilized and
restored in accordance with the Authority's landscaping guidelines.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32609
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: November 27, 2002
723
Application #: 312/01/RH
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES. #B158/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Maria Augimeri
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(9.1.13 - 9.1.27, with the exception of 9.1.20 - Peter Mulholland & Ora Ross and 9.1.23 -
Angus Glen Development Ltd., which were withdrawn), that had been scheduled on the
agenda as errata items, for which all the required Information was received and finalized
as listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
9.1.13 CITY OF BRAMPTON
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area
(Elgin Drive, Maitland Street, Williams Parkway all over Etobicoke Creek, Scott
Street over diversion channel of Etobicoke Creek), in the City of Brampton,
Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton.
The purpose is to place fill within a Regulated Area in order to facilitate repairs to existing
culvert crossings, concrete channel sections and pedestrian pathways within the Regional
Floodplain at four different locations adjacent to the Etobicoke Creek in the City of Brampton.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004.
• Drawing BR -11, Elgin Drive over Etobicoke Creek Proposed Rehabilitation, Sheet 1 of
6 dated October 10, 2002 and last revised November 19, 2002, prepared by Planmac
Inc.
• Drawing BR -11, Elgin Drive over Etobicoke Creek Proposed Rehabilitation, Sheet 2 of
6 dated October 10, 2002, prepared by Pianmac Inc.
• Drawing BR -11, Elgin Drive over Etobicoke Creek Proposed Rehabilitation, Sheet 3 of
6 dated October 10, 2002, prepared by Planmac Inc.
• Drawing BR -11, Elgin Drive over Etobicoke Creek Proposed Rehabilitation, Sheet 6 of
6 dated October 10, 2002, prepared by Pianmac Inc.
• Bridge Rehabilitation Elgin Drive Bridge over Etobicoke Creek Parapet Wall with S/W
& Railing Performance Level 2 Standard Drawing SS110 -53, prepared by Pianmac Inc.
dated October 10, 2002, received by TRCA on October 16, 2002 and red -line revised
on December 4, 2002.
• Bridge Rehabilitation Elgin Drive Bridge over Etobicoke Creek Railing for
Barrier /Parapet Wall Standard Drawing SS110 -21, prepared by Pianmac Inc. dated
October 10, 2002, received by TRCA on October 16, 2002 and red -line revised on
December 4, 2002.
724
• Drawing BR -14, Maitland Street over Etobicoke Creek Tributary Proposed
Rehabilitation, Sheet 1 of 6 dated October 10, 2002 and last revised November 19,
2002, prepared by Planmac Inc.
• Drawing BR -14, Maitland Street over Etobicoke Creek Tributary Proposed
Rehabilitation, Sheet 2 of 6 dated October 10, 2002, prepared by Planmac Inc.
• Drawing BR -14, Maitland Street over Etobicoke Creek Tributary Proposed
Rehabilitation, Sheet 3 of 6 dated October 10, 2002, prepared by Planmac Inc.
• Drawing BR -14, Maitland Street over Etobicoke Creek Tributary Proposed
Rehabilitation, Sheet 6 of 6 dated October 10, 2002, prepared by Planmac Inc.
• Bridge Rehabilitation Maitland Street Culvert over Etobicoke Creek Tributary Parapet
Wall with S/W & Railing Performance Level 2 Standard Drawing SS110 -53, prepared
by Planmac Inc. dated October 10, 2002, received by TRCA on October 16, 2002 and
red -line revised on December 4, 2002.
• Bridge Rehabilitation Maitland Street Culvert over Etobicoke Creek Tributary Railing
for Barrier /Parapet Wall Standard Drawing SS110 -21, prepared by Planmac Inc. dated
October 10, 2002, received by TRCA on October 16, 2002 and red -line revised on
December 4, 2002
• Drawing BR -15, Williams Parkway Bridge over Etobicoke Creek Tributary Proposed
Rehabilitation, Sheet 1 of 6 dated October 10, 2002 and last revised November 19,
2002, prepared by Planmac Inc.
• Drawing BR -15, Williams Parkway Bridge over Etobicoke Creek Tributary Proposed
Rehabilitation, Sheet 2 of 6 dated October 10, 2002, prepared by Planmac Inc.
• Drawing BR -15, Williams Parkway Bridge over Etobicoke Creek Tributary Proposed
Rehabilitation, Sheet 3 of 6 dated October 10, 2002, prepared by Planmac Inc.
• Drawing BR -15, Williams Parkway Bridge over Etobicoke Creek Tributary Proposed
Rehabilitation, Sheet 6 of 6 dated October 10, 2002, prepared by Planmac Inc.
• Bridge Rehabilitation Williams Parkway Bridge over Etobicoke Creek Tributary
Parapet Wall with S/W & Railing Performance Level 2 Standard Drawing SS110 -53,
prepared by Planmac Inc. dated October 10, 2002, received by TRCA on October 16,
2002 and red -line revised on December 4, 2002.
• Bridge Rehabilitation Williams Parkway Bridge over Etobicoke Creek Tributary Railing
for Barrler /Parapet Wall Standard Drawing SS110 -21, prepared by Planmac Inc. dated
October 10, 2002, received by TRCA on October 16, 2002 and red -line revised on
December 4, 2002.
• Drawing BR -16, Scott Street over Diversion Channel of Etobicoke Creek Proposed
Rehabilitation, Sheet 1 of 4 dated October 10, 2002, prepared by Planmac Inc.
• Drawing BR -16, Scott Street over Diversion Channel of Etobicoke Creek Proposed
Rehabilitation, Sheet 2 of 4 dated October 10, 2002, prepared by Planmac Inc.
• Bridge Rehabilitation BR -16, Scott Street over Diversion Channel of Etobicoke Creek
Parapet Wall with S/W & Railing Performance Level 2 Standard Drawing SS110 -53,
prepared by Planmac Inc. dated October 10, 2002, received by TRCA on October 16,
2002 and red -line revised on December 4, 2002.
• Bridge Rehabilitation BR -16, Scott Street over Diversion Channel of Etobicoke Creek
Railing for Barrier /Parapet Wall Standard Drawing SS110 -21, prepared by Planmac
Inc. dated October 10, 2002, received by TRCA on October 16, 2002 and red -line
revised on December 4, 2002.
725
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place fill within a Regulated Area in order to facilitate repairs to existing
culvert crossings, concrete channel sections and pedestrian pathways within the Regional
Storm Floodplain at four different locations adjacent to the Etobicoke Creek (Elgin Drive,
Maitland Street, Williams Parkway and Scott Street). All culvert crossings involve repairs to the
bridge decking, barrier walls, and cracks along the underside of the culverts. In addition, the
Maitland Street and Williams Parkway locations involve repairs to the sides of the concrete
lined channel and replacement of settled portions of the adjacent sidewalk. Finally, the Elgin
Drive location requires repairs of the hardened slope, under the deck, outside the culvert
abutment and a 1 -metre widening of the asphalt path adjacent to the channel.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters as all existing grades
within the Regional Storm Floodplain will be maintained.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion controls with be installed prior to and maintained during construction.
Control methods include the use of: silt fencing to surround works in the flood plain,
cofferdams for completing in channel works in the dry, and scaffold tarps above the
watercourse to capture debris generated from repairs above the culvert decking and inside the
culvert walls. All disturbed areas will be restored and restabilized following construction.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries concerns or areas of environmental significance related
to the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33667
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: October 18, 2002
Application #: 401 /02 /BRAM
9.1.14 SOMERS GLEN ESTATES
To place fill within a regulated area on Block 304, 307, Plan 43M -1512, (21 Eastview
Gate), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Somers Glen Estates.
The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area and the Regional Storm Floodplain to
be balanced by a corresponding cut in the same general area in order to moderate grade
differentials between the road and rear lot lines of six future townhouse lots.
726
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2007.
• Cut /Fill Plan, drawing no. CF -1, prepared by Nick Valle of Urban Ecosystems, dated
November 2002, stamped November 26, 2002.
• Valleyland Restoration Planting Plan, drawing no. L1, prepared by Strybos Associates
Ltd., dated February 2001, revised November 15, 2002.
• Letter of Undertaking to satisfy Authority staff concerns with landscaping and final cut
and fill calculations, prepared by Nick Valle of Urban Ecosystems, dated December 3,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place approximately 12 cubic metres of fill within a Fill Regulated Area and
the Regional Storm Floodplain to be balanced by a corresponding cut in the same general
area in order to moderate grade differentials between the road and rear lot lines of six future
townhouse lots. The six lots are part of residential development block within a recently
registered plan of subdivision on the west side of The Gore Road just north of Ebenezer Road.
The rear lot lines were established at the top of bank, outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain.
However due to the upland location of the corresponding stormwater management facility, the
required front street grade elevation is significantly higher than those at pre - development
conditions. Although Authority staff encouraged the developer to moderate the resulting grade
differential within the townhouse property limits through the use of walkout basements and
gradual slopes to the property lines, these techniques would still require the construction of
nine risers from rear yard grade levels to the basement entrance elevation. Given these
potential health and safety concerns and the lack of significant vegetation to the rear of these
lots, Authority staff feel the limited amount of fill required would be acceptable provided it is
compensated by a balanced cut and an extensive compensatory planting plan for the valley
corridor.
Control of Flooding:
The limited amount of proposed fill will be balanced by a corresponding cut location to
eliminate any negative impacts to the storage and conveyance of storm flows.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed between the proposed work area and
the watercourse to eliminate the overland migration of sediment.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns related to the proposed works. There
are no significant natural features in the proposed cut and fill locations. All disturbed areas and
additional portions of the corridor reach will be revegetated with appropriate native plantings.
727
Policy Guidelines:
Staff support of the proposed works is based on compliance with the general purpose and
principles of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program as outlined in
Sections 1.2. Although development criteria within VSCMP do not specifically recognize the
circumstances of the subject property, staff support is based on the expected public health
and safety and the net ecological integrity improvements from the proposed works.
CFN: 33766
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: November 26, 2002
CITY OF MISSISSAUGA
Application #: 437 /02 /BRAM
9.1.15 1532299 ONTARIO LTD.
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 11, Concession 7 Lot 11, Plan 43R -5637, (3375
Derry Road East), in the City of Mississauga, Mimico Creek Watershed as located
on the property owned by 1532299 Ontario Ltd..
The purpose is to construct an auto sales and repair building within the Regional Storm Flood
Plain of Mimico Creek at 3375 Derry Road East, City of Mississauga.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004.
• Site Plan - 3375 Derry Road East, prepared by Sol-Arch Limited, date received
December 4, 2002.
• First Floor Plan, prepared by Sol-Arch Limited, date received December 4, 2002.
• West Elevation Plan, prepared by Sol -Arch Limited, date received December 4, 2002.
• Front Elevation Plan, prepared by Sol -Arch Limited, date received December 4, 2002.
• East Elevation Plan, prepared by Sol -Arch Limited, date received December 4, 2002.
• Rear Elevation Plan, prepared by Sol -Arch Limited, date received December 4, 2002.
• Letter Report dated November 18, 2002 by Bi -Port Engineering Ltd., date received
November 19, 2002, confirming the flood proofing measures and that the building
foundation designed to withstand the Regional Flood Elevation and associated
velocity.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is located on the north side of Derry Road, west of Goreway Drive in the
City of Mississauga. The applicant is proposing to construct an auto sales and repair building
on the currently vacant site. The entire property is located within the Regional Storm
Floodplain of Mimico Creek. The Authority's VSCMP do allow for consideration of replacement
structures within the floodplain, based upon existing conditions as of January 1, 1987 and
subject to satisfying floodproofing criteria. The size of the replacement building is restricted to
728
the same total area of the building as it existed as of January 1, 1987 plus an addition up to
50% of the total area of the original building. A former Esso Service Station occupied the
property and was removed from the site during the mid 1990's. The applicant has submitted
documentation to the Authority demonstrating that a service station building and a kiosk
building existed on the property as of January 1, 1987. The size of the proposed auto sales
and repair building will be based upon the combined total of the original service station and
kiosk building (135.7 sq. metres) plus an additional 50% for a total proposed building size of
203.7 sq. metres. The proposed building will be floodproofed above the 350 year Flood
Elevation and the foundation wall will be designed to withstand the Regional Storm Flood
Elevation and flood velocities. The TRCA has been circulated a Minor Variance Application
(File No. "A" 697/02) and a Site Plan Application (File No. SP 02 -374) associated with the
proposed development. The Authority has recommended to the City of Mississauga that these
planning applications be deferred until such time as it can be demonstrated that a permit under
Ontario Regulation 158 can be obtained for the entire development proposal.
Control of Flooding:
All development will be located outside of the hydraulic floodway and the majority of the site is
above the 350 year Flood Elevation. On the basis that this proposal is being considered as a
replacement structure, the impacts to the control or conveyance of flooding is expected to be
minimal.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed and maintained on site for the duration of construction in order to
prevent any construction generated sediment from entering the watercourse. All excess fill will
be removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
There are no slope instability or geotechnical issues evident at this site. No significant natural
resource features be affected by the proposed works and there are no fisheries concerns. All
disturbed will areas will be stabilized and restored with planting in accordance with the
Authority's landscaping guidelines.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 D - Replacement Structures within Highly
Urbanized Areas and Section 4.2.2 C - Minor Additions within Highly Urbanized Areas of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33656
Report Prepared by: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281
For information contact: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281
Date: October 22, 2002
Application #: 406 /02 /MISS
9.1.16 STEPHEN AND LILLIAN DIOTTE
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 67, Plan
43M460, (4041 River Mill Way), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by Stephen and Lillian Diotte.
729
The purpose is to excavate and construct an inground swimming pool, an inground hot tub, a
cabana, and a fence within the Regulatory Floodplain of the Etobicoke Creek at the rear of an
existing dwelling at 4041 River Mill Way, Mississauga.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004.
• Site Plan- The Diotte Residence, prepared by Solda Pools on November 15, 2002,
redline revised by TRCA for electrical appliances elevation on December 4, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating fill and constructing in the Regional Storm Floodplain of
the Etobicoke Creek to construct a pool, hot tub, cabana and fence in the backyard of the
subject property. The subject property is an existing lot of record within a registered plan of
subdivision containing an existing dwelling. It is located entirely within the Fill Regulated Area,
and the backyard beyond the house is almost entirely within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
Engineering staff assessments indicate that the Regional Storm Elevation has increased to
include the rear yards in this area since the registration of the subdivision in the early 1980's.
This has created a situation where some lots in the area have ancillary structures within the
Regional Floodplain. As a result, the Authority has recently permitted a similar ancillary
structure in the rear yard of 'a neighbouring and feel it is appropriate to allow the same on the
subject property. Overall, there will be a net export of fill removed from the floodplain, due to
the excavation of the swimming pool. All electrical equipment will be elevated above the
Regional Storm Elevation.
Control of Flooding:
The works will not significantly affect the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. All structures,
which include a cabana, a hot tub, a pool and a rear fence, are outside of the Hydraulic
floodway and there will be a net export of fill from the Regional Storm Floodway, thereby
increasing flood storage capacity.
Pollution:
The watercourse is approximately 370 metres from the backyard of the subject property,
across a major roadway. No sedimentation of the watercourse is expected as a result of these
works. Excavated fill will be removed from the site at the owners expense.
Conservation of Land:
The existing vegetation is mowed grass, with a grassed park abutting the rear of the property.
No significant resource features will be impacted as a result of these works. There are no
geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity to Section 4.2.2 (E)- Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
730
CFN: 33741
Report Prepared by: Erin Pratley, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: November 19, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
Application #: 428/02/MISS
9.1.17 CITY OF TORONTO
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Lot 64, Plan RP -2451, (River Bank Drive), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke
Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property
owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to alter a waterway in conjunction with the removal and replacement of the
existing failed gabion structure which protected the headwall /wingwall of a storm sewer,
located on the east side of Mimico Creek, downstream of the Islington Golf Course, with an
armourstone structure, being entirely within the Regional Storm Floodplain and the Fill
Regulated Area. The existing headwall and wingwall will be replaced also.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004.
• Riverbank Drive Armourstone Bank Protection along Mimico Creek West of Hatton Crt
and South of Bend on Riverbank Dr, Drawing No. U- 2383 -1, prepared by City of
Toronto Works & Emergency Services - Technical Services Division, dated May 15,
2002, date received October 2, 2002.
• Conceptual Drawing, Dwg. No. 2, To replace 2 m gabion basket at Islington Golf
Course Footbridge, submitted by applicant, date received October 2, 2002.
• Conceptual Drawing, Dwg. No. 3 & 3B, 3 -D view of 40 m long armourstone structure
with stream barbs, submitted by applicant, date received October 2, 2002.
• Conceptual Drawing, Dwg. No. 4, 3 -D view of deflector treads tied into armourstone
structure (alternative to Dwg. No. 3), submitted by applicant, date received October 2,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to alter a waterway in conjunction with the removal and replacement of the
existing failed gabion structure which protected the headwall /wingwall of a storm sewer,
located on the east side of Mimico Creek, downstream of the Islington Golf Course on
Riverbank Drive, with an armourstone structure, being entirely within the Regional Storm
Floodplain and the Fill Regulated Area. The existing headwall and wingwall will also be
removed and replaced.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed new structures will replace the existing failed structures and therefore there will
be no further impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
731
Pollution:
The works will be constructed in the dry using jersey barriers lined with polyethylene sheets to
divert flow around the works area. Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed
and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
Potential impacts to fish habitat can be mitigated through the use of erosion control measures,
site restoration and completing instream works during warm water timing guidelines of July 1
to March 31.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33678
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: October 22, 2002
Application #: 407/02/TOR
9.1.18 HUMBER ARBORETUM
To construct in a flood plain (205 Humber College Boulevard), in the City of Toronto
(Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by The Toronto & Region Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to erect a memorial site for the Toronto Professional Firefighters Association at
the Humber Arboretum, being entirely within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the West
Humber River, in memory of the firefighters who lost their lives in the World Trade Center
disaster in New York on September 11, 2001.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Humber Arboretum Demonstration Gardens, submitted by applicant,
date received November 25, 2002.
• Site Plan and Proposed Memorial Design Plans, prepared by Humber Arboretum, date
received November 25, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
732
Proposal:
The proposed works involve the erection of several pillars and 0.7 m. high brick walls, stone
benches, and a memorial pedestal, in the centre of a small island in the existing man -made
pond on the Arboretum lands, being entirely within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the West
Humber River. The Toronto Professional Firefighters Association memorial site serves as a
memorial to the firefighters who lost their lives during the World Trade Center disaster in New
York on September 11, 2001.
Control of Flooding:
The memorial site is located above the 100 Year flood level, within the floodfringe portion of the
Regional Storm Floodplain of the West Humber River and consists of several pillars and low
brick walls and benches. The proposed works will not significantly affect the storage or
conveyance of flood waters and will withstand flood depths and velocities.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented and maintained to ensure that
construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works involve minimal excavation and grading and no loss of riparian
vegetation. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures
- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33762
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: November 25, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (HUMBER YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 436/02/TOR
9.1.19 CITY OF TORONTO
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Block B, Plan 2293,
(North of Bloor Street and West of Riverside Drive), in the City of Toronto (Humber
York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to construct a concrete storm sewer outfall structure at the end of the existing
525 mm clay pipe outfall and to install armourstone to provide erosion protection below the
outfall, which is located on the east side of the Humber River, north of Bloor Street, and within
the Regional Storm Floodplain.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004.
733
• Humber River Pumping Station Design to Repair Outfall Structure North of Bloor St.
Bridge, West of Riverside Drive, Dwg. No. 2002 -H12, prepared by City of Toronto
Works & Emergency Services, Technical Services Division, dated November 2002,
date received November 25, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a concrete storm sewer outfall structure at the end of the existing
525 mm clay pipe outfall and to install armourstone to provide erosion protection below the
outfall, which is located on the east side of the Humber River, north of Bloor Street, and within
the Regional Storm Floodplain.
Control of Flooding:
The new outfall structure will be built back into the existing embankments and no work is
occurring within the watercourse. The proposed works will therefore maintain the existing
channel profile and will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented and maintained during
construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
No work is located within the watercourse and any impacts to fish habitat will be mitigated
through the use of erosion control measures and restoration of all disturbed areas. No riparian
vegetation will be removed and enhancement of the site will be achieved through the planting
of woody vegetation on the site.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the
Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33479
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: September 11, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 344/02/TOR
9.1.20 PETER MULHOLLAND & ORA ROSS
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12, Plan 2069, (6 Mylesview Place),
in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Peter Mulholland & Ora Ross.
• Withdrawn
734
CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY)
9.1.21 ANNA DELLAPORTAS -MANOS
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 2, Concession 2, (61 Boydwood
Lane), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Rouge River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Anna Dellaportas - Manos.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to
facilitate the construction of an addition onto the north side of the existing residence on the
tableland portion of the site.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004.
• Site Plan for Manos Residence, prepared by Amsen Associates, revision date
December 2, 2002, date received December 2, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to
facilitate the construction of an addition onto the north side of the existing residence on the
tableland portion of the site. The existing house maintains a minimum 6 metre setback from
the top of bank of the adjacent Rouge valley slope, while the proposed addition will maintain a
minimum 2 metre setback from the stable top of bank. A geotechnical assessment of the site
has determined that the well vegetated valley slope is stable.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located entirely above the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore there
will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood water.
Pollution:
Sediment is not expected to enter the watercourse as the proposed works are located
approximately 250 metres from the Rouge River. However, a silt fence will be installed and
maintained during the construction project.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed addition will be situated on the tableland portion of the site, and will maintain a
minimum 2 metre setback from the stable top of bank. The proposed works are consistent
with existing development in the corridor reach and no significant resource features will be
affected by the construction. There are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with
the project, as a geotechnical assessment of the site has determined that the valley slope is
stable.
735
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33707
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: November 1, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 416/02/TOR
9.1.22 VELLORE VILLAGE ESTATES INC.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 16 & 17, Concession 6, (north of
Rutherford Road, east of Pine Valley Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Vellore Village Estates Inc..
The purpose is to place /move fill in a fill regulated area in order to strip topsoil and excavate to
facilitate the construction of Phase 5 of a draft approved residential plan of subdivision
(19T- 89024).
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2007.
• Letter of Undertaking from Nelson Lee, Ander Engineering & Associates Limited,
dated November 29, 2002, agreeing to address comments in TRCA's a -mall
correspondence of November 28, 2002
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to strip topsoil and excavate in a Fill Regulated Area in order to begin
construction of Phase 5 of a draft approved plan of subdivision (Town file no. 19T- 89024). The
proposal will satisfy a condition of draft plan approval issued by staff through our subdivision
review. The excavation and preliminary grading are for two temporary sediment control ponds
which will have no connection to the valley corridor or watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Therefore, there
will be no impacts to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
A sediment and erosion control plan, reviewed and accepted by staff, will be implemented and
maintained on site for the duration of construction, in order to prevent sediment from entering
the watercourse.
736
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries issued associated with this proposal. No significant
natural heritage features will be affected by the proposal and all disturbed areas will be
stabilized and restored.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33426
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: August 20, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 321 /02/VAUG
9.1.23 ANGUS GLEN DEVELOPMENT LTD.
To alter a waterway on Lot 19, Concession 5, (Southwest corner of Kennedy Road
and Sixteenth Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located
on the property owned by Angus Glen Development Ltd..
• Withdrawn
9.1.24 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain (Elgin Mills Road between Bayview
Avenue and Woodbine Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed
as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York.
The purpose is to construct structures ( four culvert extensions and one culvert replacement)
within a Regional Storm Floodplain; to alter a watercourse ( Rouge River tributaries) during the
coldwater timing window through a dam and pump around method, watercourse alterations for
tie -ins and SWM pond connections.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions as per RV Anderson's letter dated
November 19, 2002 and TRCA's letter dated December 2, 2002); dated December 2,
2002; received December 3, 2002.
737
• Elgin Mills Road - Bayview Avenue to Woodbine; Sheet R -1- Legend; Sheet
R -15- Highway 404 Sta. 20 +450 to Sta. 20 +775; Sheet R -18- Removals -Elgin Mills Road
Sta. 1+750 to 2 +350; Sheet R- 19- Removals -Elgin Mills Road Sta. 2 +350 to 2 +950;
Sheet R- 12- Removals -Elgin Mills Road -Sta. 3 +600 to Sta. 4 +250; Sheet R -22 -Elgin
Mills Road -Sta. 4 +250 to Sta. 5 +400; Sheet R -39 -New Construction -Elgin Mills Road
Sta. 1 +750 to Sta. 2 +050; Sheet R-41 -New Construction -Elgin Mills Road -Sta. 2 +350
to Sta. 2 +650; Sheet R -42 -New Construction -Elgin Mills Road Sta. 2 +650 to Sta.
2 +950; Sheet R -45 -New Construction -Elgin Mills Road Sta. 3 +600 to Sta. 3 +950;
Sheet R -47 -New Construction -Elgin Mills Road Sta. 4 +250 to Sta. 4 +600; Sheet
R-48 -New Construction -Elgin Mills Road Sta. 5 +050 to Sta. 5 +400; Sheet R52- General
Notes and Details; Sheet 52A -Elgin Mills Road - Bayview Avenue to
Woodbine- Standard Drawings; all received September 23, 2002; all prepared by R. V.
Anderson Associates Umited.
• Elgin Mills Road - Bayview Avenue to Woodbine Avenue; Contract 03 -101; Sheet
C -1 -Creek Replacement at 2 +470 and Details; Sheet C -2 -Creek Replacement at
4 +450 and Details; Sheet C -3 -Creek Replacement at 2 +860 and Details; all dated
September 25, 2002; all received October 3, 2002; prepared by R. V. Anderson and
Associates Umited.
• Sheet W- 4- Watermain -Elgin Mills Road Sta. 2 +350 to Sta. 2 +650; Sheet W -5-
Watermaln -Elgin Mills road Sta. 2 +650 to Sta. 2 +950; Sheet W- 10- Watermain -Elgin
Mills Road -Sta. 4 +250 to Sta. 4 +600; all dated September 13, 2002; all received
September 24, 2002; prepared by R. V. Anderson and Associates Limited.
• Sheet S -20 -Rouge River Structure - General Arrangement; dated September 13, 2002;
received September 23, 2002; prepared by R. V. Anderson Associates Limited.
• Drawing SWM -11; Elgin Mills Road - Highway 404 /Elgin Mills Road Interchange -Post
Development Drainage; dated September 5, 2002; received September 23, 2002;
prepared by R. V. Anderson Associates Limited.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the Elgin Mills Road widening from a 2 lane rural section to a 5 lane
urban section from Bayview Avenue in the west to Woodbine in the east with a watermain
installation via open cut. The project also involves the cloverleaf interchange at Highway 404
which will include Storm Water Management ponds. This project was reviewed by staff during
the Environmental Assessment process. There are 6 watercourse crossings along this stretch
of Elgin Mills Road which are number from east to west. Crossings 1 and 3 will have culvert
extensions whereas Crossing 2 will have the existing culvert removed and replaced with a
wider and longer culvert. Crossings 4 and 5 will have culvert extensions and watercourse
alterations to tie into the new channel. There will be no works involved with Crossing 6.
Associated with the road widening will be the installation of the watermain via open cut and this
installation will be completed in the dry and simultaneously with the watercourse works to
avoid environmental disturbance. This section of Elgin Mills Road is not within a Fill Regulated
Area. Only Crossings 2 and 5 are located within a Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge
River.
738
Control of Flooding:
The hydraulic analyses for each crossing have been reviewed and it has been determined that
there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. Grades will be maintained
within the Regional Storm Floodplain. Stormwater management has been reviewed for water
quantity.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, rock check dams, silt control for catchbasins,
pea gravel bag dam, sheet piling dam, pump around) will be implemented to ensure that the
construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Stormwater management has
been reviewed for water quality.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project with the culvert extensions and the
replacement. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful
alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated at Crossings 1, 2, 3
and a Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of DFO pending Executive Committee approval.
The in stream works associated with Crossings 4 and 5 will constitute a harmful alteration,
disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat and will require an authorization from the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The client has provided a Letter of Intent which
stipulates how the HADD will be compensated. A net benefit will be provided with the
enhancement of the riparian zone, the inclusion of a diversity of stone sizes; the improvement
of the fish barrier at Crossing 4, the creation of the plunge pool at the downstream end of
Crossing 4 and the creation of in stream habitat as a result of the widening of the upstream
channel. When the DFO authorization has been received, TRCA staff will be in a position to
issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32879
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: November 27, 2002
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 044 /02 /MARK
9.1.25 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 48, Concession 1 EYS, (culvert
on Crosby Avenue, east of Yonge Street, south of Elgin Mills Road, west of Newkirk
Avenue), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Town of Richmond Hill.
739
The purpose is to construct a structure (removal of deteriorated culverts two- 1400mm x 950mm
CSP arch culverts and replacement with one 2400mm x 1500mm x 26m concrete box culvert)
within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (German Mills Creek) during the
warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through a dam and pump around method in
order to work in the dry for culvert and watermain installations.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to the drawings); dated November
28, 2002; received December 4, 2002; prepared by the Town of Richmond Hill.
• Cover Sheet - Crosby Avenue Culvert Replacement; Contract- TE- 07 -02; Sheet
1- Crosby Avenue - General Notes; Sheet 2- Culvert Replacement Sections and Details;
Sheet 3- Culvert Replacement Sta.0 +600 to 0 +740; Sheet 4- Culvert Replacement Sta.
1+070 to 1+140; Sheet 5- Culvert Replacement- Sediment Control and Flow By -pass;
Sheet 6- Culvert Replacement -OPSD and Planting Details; all dated October 22, 2002;
all received October 23, 2002; prepared by the Ainley Group.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The works involve the removal of the existing deteriorated twin culverts (1400mm x 950mm
CSP arch culverts) and the replacement with one 2400mm x 1500mm x 26 metre box culvert.
The watercourse will be dammed and pumped in order to work in the dry for the culvert
installation (north /south) as well as the installation of the watermain above the culvert
(east/west). The project proceeded under a Schedule A- Class Environmental Assessment.
Control of Flooding:
The hydraulics have been reviewed and the proposed box culvert will not have any implications
to flood storage or conveyance. Existing grades will be maintained within the Regional
Floodplain.
Pollutipn:
Standard erosion control measures (pea gravel bag dam and pump around, sediment fence,
rock check dam) will be implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do
not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project. The German Mills Creek will be
temporarily dammed and pumped around in order to install the culvert and the watermain in
the dry. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration,
disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated. Pending Executive
Committee approval TRCA staff will be able to issue a Letter of Advice on behalf of the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial
resource features.
740
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33388
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: November 22, 2002
Application #: 299/02/RH
9.1.26 WYCLIFFE ELGIN WEST LIMITED
To alter a waterway on Lot 6,7, Concession 1 Plan RP -4667, (Gamble Road), in the
Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Wycliffe Elgin West Limited.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse to facilitate the construction of a storm sewer outlet and
an inverted sanitary sewer crossing to service a draft approved residential plan of subdivision
(19T- 00013).
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2007.
• Drawing No. P3, Sanitary and Storm Outfall, prepared by URS Cole Sherman, dated
November 14, 2002.
• Drawing No. RG1, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, prepared by URS Cole
Sherman, dated November 14, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a storm sewer outfall to the German Mills Creek and a sanitary
sewer crossing of the Creek in order to service a draft approved residential plan of subdivision
(Town File No.19T- 00013). The subdivision plan was accepted by staff through our review of
the subdivision application. The permit application for servicing fulfills a condition of draft plan
approval issued by staff. The servicing is consistent with the stormwater management scheme
also accepted by staff through their review of the subdivision plan.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works extend partially into the Regional Storm Flood Plain, but final grades will
match existing and all excess fill will be removed from the site. Staff have determined that the
proposed works will not affect the control of flooding.
Pollution:
A sediment and erosion control plan will be implemented on site for the duration of the works
as reviewed and accepted by staff, in order to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
741
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical issues associated with the proposal and no significant natural
heritage features will be affected. The sanitary sewer crossing will be conducted by open
trench method under dry conditions. Staff determined that the works will not constitute a
Harmful Alteration, Destruction or Disruption (HADD) to fish habitat, in accordance with the
Federal Fisheries Act. A Letter of Advice will be issued to mitigate any potential impacts in this
regard. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored with plantings in accordance with
Authority landscaping guidelines.
Policy Guidelines:
This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33361
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: July 11, 2002
TOWNSHIP OF ADJALA - TOSORONTIO
Application #: 277/02/RH
9.1.27 PINO RAVALLESE
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 7, Concession 3, (1029 concession
3), in the Township of Adjala- Tosorontio, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Pino Ravallese.
The purpose is to remove fill from a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River at 1029 3rd Line
Adjala, in order to construct a pond for aesthetic purposes on a large rural estate lot.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004.
• Site Plan showing proposed pond location, prepared by Pino Ravallese, received by
TRCA on October 24, 2002, redline revised for landscaping details, sediment fencing,
fill removal and pond location by TRCA on November 21, 2002.
• List of Approved Native Species, Submitted by Pino Ravallese on November 22, 2002,
revised by TRCA on November 22, 2002.
• Silt Fence Detail, TRCA Sediment and Erosion Control Guidelines.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River Watershed in
order to establish a pond to be use for aesthetic purposes. The proposed pond location is
located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River. The subject property is
located north of Highway 9, on the east side of 3rd Line Adjala. Currently, a residential house
is being constructed on the subject property, in a location outside of the Fill Regulated Area.
742
The pond is proposed along the front of the property, approximately 15.5 metres (50 feet) from
an adjacent wetland. A staff ecologist and the staff hydrogeologist have reviewed the
proposed pond, and have no concerns. The pond will be approximately 6 meters deep at the
deepest point, and 0.3 meters deep at the shallowest point. The subject property is located on
the Oak Ridges Moraine in an area designated as Natural Core Area by the Oak Ridges
Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP). Although the subject property is not subject to a
planning application and therefore not subject to the ORMCP, Authority staff are of the opinion
that the proposal maintains the ecological integrity of the Moraine.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed pond is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Humber River
and is not expected to affect the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
The pond is approximately 195 metres from the watercourse, with the wetland located in
between. A sediment control fence will be erected between the proposed works and the
wetland to protect the wetland and the watercourse from any sedimentation as a result of
construction. All excavated fill will be removed from the Fill Regulated Area on the subject
property. Sedimentation as a result of these works is not expected.
Conservation of Land:
The works are located in a grassed area, setback a minimum of 15.5 meters from the wetland.
No significant vegetation will be disturbed, and the area adjacent to the pond will be restored
with non - invasive, native species. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns
associated with the proposed works.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2 E- Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33688
Report Prepared by: Erin Pratley, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: October 25, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH DISTRICT)
Application #: 408 /02 /ADJ
9.1.28 ESTATE OF E. ORDE TUFF
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 53, Plan 4351, (115 Sylvan Avenue), in the
City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed as
located on the property owned by Estate of E. Orde Tuff.
The purpose is to construct a second floor addition to the existing home on the existing
foundation and add a basement walkout at grade with a deck above.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004 in
accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
743
• Existing Front Elevation for 115 Sylvan Avenue prepared by z axis design Inc. 197
Withrow Avenue, Toronto Ontario M4K 1 E2, Received Nov 19, 2002.
• Existing West Elevation for 115 Sylvan Avenue prepared by z axis design Inc. 197
Withrow Avenue, Toronto Ontario M4K 1 E2, Received Nov 19, 2002.
• Existing South Elevation for 115 Sylvan Avenue prepared by z axis design Inc. 197
Withrow Avenue, Toronto Ontario M4K 1 E2, Received Nov 19, 2002.
• Proposed Basement Plan for 115 Sylvan Avenue prepared by z axis design inc. 197
Withrow Avenue, Toronto Ontario M4K 1 E2, Received Nov 19, 2002.
• Proposed First Floor Plan for 115 Sylvan Avenue prepared by z axis design inc. 197
Withrow Avenue, Toronto Ontario M4K 1 E2, Received Nov 19, 2002.
• Proposed Second Floor Plan for 115 Sylvan Avenue prepared by z axis design Inc.
197 Withrow Avenue, Toronto Ontario M4K 1 E2, Received Nov 19, 2002.
• Proposed Cross - Section A -A for 115 Sylvan Avenue prepared by z axis design Inc.
197 Withrow Avenue, Toronto Ontario M4K 1 E2, Received Nov 19, 2002.
• Proposed East Elevation for 115 Sylvan Avenue prepared by z axis design Inc. 197
Withrow Avenue, Toronto Ontario M4K 1 E2, Received Nov 19, 2002.
• Proposed South Elevation for 115 Sylvan Avenue prepared by z axis design Inc. 197
Withrow Avenue, Toronto Ontario M4K 1 E2, Received Nov 19, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
Is to renovate the existing home located at 115 Sylvan Avenue in the City of Toronto on the
property located at Lot 53 Plan 4351. The renovation includes the addition of a second storey
to the home, a basement walkout that will be developed at grade, and includes a deck installed
on top of this walk out basement addition. The work is located approximately 30 m back from
the edge of the bluff.
Control of Flooding:
The works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of Lake Ontario and are
setback sufficiently from Lake Ontario, approximately 150m. As a result there will be no impact
on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
As the work does not involve any grading and only very minor excavation work, there will not
be any impact to the surrounding land or lake. Sediment fencing shall be installed between the
work area and the edge of the bluff.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is located within a developed community along this portion of the lakefront
and is consistent with the surrounding suburban development. A geotechnical report has been
submitted on behalf of the owner in support of the proposed additions to the home. The
geotechnical report has been reviewed and excepted by this Authority, we have no concerns
with regard to the conclusions drawn by the geotechnical engineer regarding the stable slope
Tine and find the proposed extent of the re- development to be acceptable. In addition, there is
no proposed grading at the rear of the lot and all excess soil shall be removed from the site.
744
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2 Existing Development of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program and the works are in compliance with the
Provincial Policy Statement for Natural Hazards on the Great Lakes Shoreline.
CFN: 33759
Report Prepared by: David Lawrie, extension 5268
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: November 25, 2002
Application #: 435/02/TOR
RES. #B159/02 - ASHBRIDGE'S BAY BREAKWATER PROJECT CONSULTANT
CONTRACT EXTENSION
To extend the W.F. Baird & Associates contract for the Ashbridge's Bay
Breakwater Project to complete the final design to address the on -going
sedimentation and shoreline stability issues and to provide technical
support for completion of the Class Environmental Assessment process
for this project.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Irene Jones
THAT the W.F. Baird & Associates contract for the final study and design for the
construction of the Ashbridge's Bay Breakwater be extended by an amount of $ 21,800,
excluding GST, bringing the total upset limit for the consulting contract to approximately
$90,900, excluding GST.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At meeting #6/00 held on Friday July 7, 2000 the Members of the Executive Committee
adopted Resolution #B101 /00:
"THAT the firm of W.F. Baird and Associates be retained to complete the final design for
sedimentation and shoreline stability at Coatsworth Cut, Ashbridge's Bay Park, City of
Toronto, at a total upset limit of $ 54, 060, including GST;
AND FURTHER THAT W.F. Baird and Associates be retained to complete a water
quality /circulation study of the final design for Coatsworth Cut at a total upset limit of
$19,880, including GST, subject to detailed discussions with the City of Toronto Works
Department staff regarding their Coatsworth Cut initiatives."
Additional factors relating to the Main Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment and Site
Landscape design process and the Wet Weather Flow Study, additional sedimentation and
circulation modelling and analysis were required to complete the final design. In addition,
comments from the public meeting in November of 2000 were incorporated in order to finalize
the preferred design.
745
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
The consultant will complete the final analysis, design and detailed construction drawings, and
provide assistance with finalizing the public consultation component of the Class E.A. process.
RATIONALE
W.F. Baird & Associates have finalized the preferred design and completed the draft
sedimentation report Circulation Study for the preferred option.
The extension of the Baird contract is recommended in order to maintain consistency and
continuity with the finalization of the preferred design option, including the coastal and
sedimentation analysis and to provide technical support for the public consultation portion of
the Class E.A. process.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The additional expenditure for the contract extension is provided within Account No. 211 -16.
Report prepared by: Mark Preston, 416- 392 -9722
For Information contact: Jim Berry, 416- 392 -9721
Date: November 26, 2002
RES. #B160102 - CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE 1:2,000 SCALE DIGITAL
TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING FOR THE PURPOSE OF FLOOD PLAIN
MAPPING WITHIN THE ROUGE RIVER WATERSHED
Approval to retain the services of First Base Solutions Inc. for the
purpose of producing new 1:2,000 scale digital topographic mapping
within the Rouge River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Irene Jones
THAT the Authority retain First Base Solutions Inc., to complete the new 1:2,000 scale
digital topographic mapping at a total cost not to exceed $12,840.00 inclusive of all
applicable taxes.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
One of the main objectives identified within the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and
mapped information for use by the Authority and others, and to incorporate improved
technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order
to continue to provide accurate flood plain management information, the Water Management
Division has prepared a Flood Plain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific
requirements necessary to update the Authority's current Flood and Fill Line Regulation
Mapping. One of the priority watersheds identified within the Work Plan is the Rouge River
given the extent of previous, current and future development activities.
746
As part of the Rouge Watershed update, the upper Rouge tributaries located north of Elgin
Mills Road and West of Bayview Avenue as well as Beaver Creek, north of Highway 404, were
identified as areas that had not been previously mapped as part of the original TRCA flood
plain mapping program. The total area requiring mapping comprises approximately 351 ha
and 163 ha respectively which is equivalent to six (6) new map sheets. The proposed work
would involve the preparation of new 1:2,000 scale digital topographic mapping for both
reaches which would be used to complete hydraulic modelling and subsequent delineation of
flood lines for the purpose of flood plain management.
A Request for Proposal (RFP) was prepared by TRCA for the above noted work and circulated
to four mapping consultants. Proposals were received by the following consultants and
include associated cost to complete the work including all applicable taxes:
First Base Solutions Inc.
Marshall Macklin Monaghan
QSP Geographics Inc.
Northway - Photomap Inc.
$12,840.00
$17,888.26
$20,302.18
$33,592.65
The proposals were reviewed and the preferred consultant was selected based on project
understanding, proposed methodologies and deliverables, previous experience and overall
cost.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds required to complete the project are available within the approved 2002 Flood Plain
Management budget 115 -85. A maximum upset limit of $12,840.00, inclusive of applicable
taxes, has been set as specified in the proposal submitted by the selected consultant.
Report prepared by: Glenn Farmer, extension 5351
For Information contact: Glenn Farmer, extension 5351
Date: November 25, 2002
RES. #B161/02 - GREENROOFS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT
Dedicated Web Server, CFN 31240. Approval to contribute $30,000 to
Seneca College's applied research program. The money will be used to
purchase hardware and software in support of the Dedicated Web Server
being implemented at Seneca College for the Greenroofs for Stormwater
Management Project. TRCA will maintain ownership of equipment
purchased for this project.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Irene Jones
747
THAT the Authority contribute $30,000 toward the Dedicated Web Server being
implemented at Seneca College as part of the Greenroofs for Stormwater Management
Project.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Through urban development in Toronto and surrounding areas, the presence of impervious
surfaces such as roads and rooftops has increased from the natural predevelopment state,
leading to numerous problems which challenge our ability to achieve environmental
sustainability. Technologies such as greenroofs or rooftop gardens may prove beneficial in
terms of environmental sustainability since greenroof infrastructure provides the necessary
components to support a range of natural landscapes on both flat and sloped rooftops of new
and existing buildings.
In 2000, The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), Seneca College of Applied
Arts and Technology (Seneca College), and other partners agreed to join forces and form the
GREENROOF SYSTEMS CONSORTIUM. The goal of this consortium is to develop and
perform greenroof systems research projects that will evaluate, optimize and demonstrate the
combined use of natural systems to control stormwater runoff quantity and quality, reduce
municipal water demands, recycle indoor air and reduce urban island heat effects. At the
Watershed Management Advisory Board Meeting ( #3/00) it was proposed that the TRCA enter
into a Memorandum of Understanding as a Member of the Greenroof Systems Consortium.
The Greenroof Systems Consortium has recently initiated the Greenroofs for Stormwater
Management Project, a web based monitoring and analysis program researching the
stormwater management benefits of two rooftop garden sites within the Toronto Area of
Concern. The locations include a new building on the York University Campus and the
retrofitted Eastview Community Centre within the City of Toronto. An agreement with York has
been established to continue monitoring until the end of 2004. Following an evaluation at the
end of this monitoring period, the equipment may remain at the York site or moved to another
location within the Toronto Area of Concern for additional data collection. Monitoring at the
Eastview site is on -going depending on funding availability.
This project's aim is to quantify the benefits of rooftop gardens in the control of urban
stormwater runoff from both a quantity and quality perspective. The Dedicated Web Server
being implemented at Seneca College will be used to collect the data and to disseminate
information relating to the project (i.e. photos of the site, description of the monitoring program,
monitoring results, etc.). The web server will allow the remote retrieval of data over the internet
and will eliminate the need for trips to the sites. Also, the web server will make the data
available to anyone with proper password access from the internet. Equipment purchased for
the Web Server and the monitoring program will become the property of the TRCA.
The findings of this study will be used to evaluate the potential benefits of implementing
greenroofs on a broader scale (i.e. sewershed, subwatershed, etc.). The potential benefits will
be quantified using the HSPF model which was previously developed for the City of Toronto's
Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan.
748
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The $30,000 contribution will be used to purchase hardware and software in support of the
Dedicated Web Server and monitoring equipment for the two sites. Funds acquired from the
Great Lakes Sustainability Funds are available in account 113 -72 to complete this project.
Report prepared by: Grace Tesa, extension 5659
For Information contact: Glenn MacMillan, extension 5212
Date: November 25, 2002
RES. #B162/02 - PROJECT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF NATURAL AREAS WITHIN
THE ROUGE RIVER WATERSHED
Tompion Limited, CFN 29782. Update on the purchase of property
owned by Tompion Limited, located on the north west corner of Steeles
Avenue East and the Ninth Line, in the Town of Markham, Regional
Municipality of York.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Irene Jones
THAT the Regional Municipality of York and the Town of Markham be advised that the
conditions of funding the Tompion Limited property are acceptable to TRCA.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At meeting #6/02, held on June 21, 2002, the Authority adopted Res. #146/02:
THAT 16 hectares (40 acres) more or less, consisting of a rectangular shaped parcel of
land, be purchased from Tompion Limited, said lands being Part of Lots 1 and 2,
Concession 8, Town of Markham, Regional Municipality of York, located on the north
west corner of Steeles Avenue East and the Ninth Line;
THAT the purchase price be $2,500,000;
THAT the Province of Ontario, The Regional Municipality of York and the Town of
Markham be requested to assist with the funding of this transaction;
THAT acquisition by TRCA is conditional on the availability of all necessary funding;
THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to
existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner, Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
749
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
Funding commitments have now been secured from the Province of Ontario through the
Ecological Land Acquisition Program, the Regional Municipality of York and the Town of
Markham.
The Regional Municipality of York's funding is subject to the following conditions:
a) TRCA, the Rouge Park Alliance, the Town of Markham and the Minister of Natural
Resources confirm that they will consent to York Region's future public infrastructure
requirements on the property which include:
i) road widenings for Steeles Avenue East and Ninth Line and related intersections,
interchange improvements and grade separations, and
ii) the extension of the Markham By -Pass, should the Region's pending Environmental
Assessment find that the preferred alignment of Markham By -Pass extension be
through the property;
b) With the exception of the land required for public infrastructure, the property be
protected in perpetuity for public open space and Rouge Park purposes;
c) That the partners agree that the easterly tablelands will be re- vegetated in accordance
with the objectives of the Rouge North Management Plan;
d) That the westerly tablelands already subject to Urban Designation in the Official Plans for
the Region of York and the Town of Markham be disposed of as appropriate with the
proceeds being shared between the funding partners in proportion to their initial
contribution.
The Town of Markham's funding is subject to the following conditions:
a) The acquisition by TRCA of the property will not compromise the ability to complete
proposed future infrastructure projects, including the Markham By -Pass;
b) With the exception of the land required for public infrastructure, the property be
protected in perpetuity for public open space and Rouge Park purposes,
At a meeting of the Rouge Park Alliance held on Friday November 22, 2002, the Alliance
agreed to the conditions imposed by the Region of York.
RATIONALE
TRCA's practice has been to convey lands required by the local and regional municipalities for
public infrastructure. The conditions relating to the widening of Steeles Avenue, Ninth Line and
the Markham By -Pass would be in line with current practices.
750
While it would be the preference of the Rouge Park Alliance to retain all of the property and not
sell the easterly tableland, the Alliance has agreed to the Region's proposal where a majority of
the property will be preserved in public ownership. In consultation with the Province of Ontario,
the Town of Markham and the Rouge Park Alliance it was concluded that these conditions were
consistant with the original approval of the purchase of this property.
WORK TO BE DONE
Future decisions about the proposed disposal of the westerly portion of the property will be
made in full consultation with the Regional Municipality of York, the Town of Markham and the
Province.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245 or Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: November 25, 2002
Attachments: 1
751
Attachment 1
RE:
PROJECT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF NATURAL AREAS WITHIN
THE ROUGE RIVER WATERSHED
Tomplon Limited
CFN 29782
752
oonser rfon
SUBJECT PROPERTY
RES.#B163/02 - APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
Brian Casagrande. Appointment of Enforcement Officer to administer
Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation (Ontario
Regulation 158).
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Irene Jones
THAT Brian Casagrande be appointed as Enforcement Officer for the purpose of
enforcing Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterway Regulations (Ontario Regulation
158) made by The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, pursuant to Section 28 of
the Conservation Authorities Act.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Conservation Authorities Act provides for an Authority to appoint Enforcement Officers to
enforce its regulations. There are several Authority staff who currently have this designation,
both for the purpose of enforcing the Authority's regulation and for authorizing the issuance of
permits approved by the Executive Committee under the regulation.
RATIONALE
Mr. Brian Casagrande has recently been appointed to the position of Acting Senior Planner
within the Development Services Section. In this position, he has the responsibility for
supervising the Authority's regulation services associated with the review and approval of
applications. His appointment as Enforcement Officer will enable him to authorize the issuance
of approvals for the work that he supervises and will allow him to assist with the enforcement of
the regulation as required.
Report prepared by: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214
For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214
Date: November 27, 2002
RES. #B164 /02 - PEEL REGION SUBWATERSHED PLANNING - IDENTIFICATION OF
RIPARIAN ZONES AND THEIR CONDITION PROJECT
To retain the services of a consultant to identify the riparian zone and it's
condition in the Centreville Creek Subwatershed
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Irene Jones
THAT the firm of LGL Limited be retained to complete the Identification of Riparian Zones
and their Condition project in the Centreville Creek subwatershed at a total cost of
$22,268.25 (including GST).
CARRIED
753
BACKGROUND
The Centreville Creek Subwatershed is an approximately 50km 2 sub -basin of the main branch
of the Humber River. It is composed of mostly rural land use and natural areas. The Village of
Caledon East is the only significant urban centre within the subwatershed.
Like many areas on the outskirts of Toronto, the Centreville Creek Subwatershed is under
development pressure. In order to ensure that the natural features and functions of the basin
are protected, a number of in -depth studies are being conducted by the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority, with help from the Region of Peel. One of these studies is the
Identification of Riparian Zones and Their Condition.
The role of the riparian zone is well documented in performing a variety of functions including:
maintaining or enhancing water quality and bank stabilization; reducing water temperature
increases; moderating downstream flood peaks; providing a source of organic material and
woody debris to the aquatic environment; acting as a physical barrier to human intrusion; and,
in providing valuable habitat to a range of wildlife species.
However, there is a wide range of literature recommending varying widths of riparian zones to
buffer against the effects of adjacent land uses, often depending on the function of the riparian
zone. These differing widths complicate the establishment of buffer areas when development
activities are planned for a site and, in cases where too small a buffer is used, may cause
impacts on the watercourse and ultimately, the aquatic community.
The purpose of this project is to outline a set of criteria for delineating riparian zones, apply
these criteria to identify riparian zones and their form /function in the Centreville Creek
Subwatershed, and assess the condition of the zone at a local scale. The project will include
conducting an extensive review of relevant literature and research related to defining an
appropriate minimum width of riparian zone to fulfill the varying functions listed above. The
resulting Riparian Zone Model will allow for the application of a consistent approach to identify
the minimum riparian zone width given site specific features and functions.
RATIONALE
Proposals were submitted to seven consultants, with a cost summary (including GST) shown
below:
Gartner Lee Limited
LGL Limited Environmental Research Associates
Limnoterra Group Limited
ESG International Incorporated
Michalski Neilsen Associates
D.G. Cunningham and Associates
Niblett Environmental Associates
The consultants were evaluated on the basis of the following criteria:
No proposal submitted
$22,268.25
$24,921.41
No proposal submitted
$24,984.00
No proposal submitted
No proposal submitted
• the consultants understanding of the assignment and relevant previous experience;
• experience and expertise of the key members of the consulting team;
754
understanding of background information, project, environmental concerns and
proposed approach;
time frames for completion of study and work plan; and
cost.
Based on the review criteria, the proposal submitted by LGL Limited best fulfilled the
requirements of the Terms Of Reference.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
• meet with consultant to discuss project
•
•
•
review scientific literature to develop model
apply model to Centreville Creek subwatershed
assess state of the riparian zone
prepare final report by end of February
FUTURE BENEFITS /PROBLEMS
Development and application of the model will be useful in the Region of Peel Subwatershed
Planning initiative. It is also anticipated that the model will be applicable elsewhere in the
TRCA's jurisdiction.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds are available in account 122 -25. The work is being funded by the Region of Peel.
Report prepared by: Jon Clayton, extension 5353
For Information contact: Jon Clayton, extension 5353
Date: December 4, 2002
RES. #B165/02 - MAPLE SYRUP TENDER CA02 -001
Withdrawn. Withdrawal of the staff recommendations on Maple Syrup
Tender CA02 -001.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Irene Jones
THAT the staff report dated November 22, 2002, entitled Maple Syrup Tender CA02 -001
be withdrawn;
THAT the tender be re- issued to the original vendors and a staff recommendation brought
to the January 2003 Executive Committee Meeting;
755
AND FURTHER THAT all bidders be advised.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The original tender was issued to 5 vendors and two vendors submitted bids. Upon
examination of the bids, it was determined that confusion arose from the wording of the tender
in regards to the specification of bottles. In order to ensure the bidders are given equal and fair
opportunities, staff will clarify the wording and re -issue the tender to all original vendors.
Tenders will be due on January 6, 2002, to ensure enough time for staff to review the tenders in
time to report to the Executive Committee on January 17, 2002.
In the interim, the bidders will be advised of the withdrawal of the November 22, 2002 report
and the re- tendering process.
For Information contact: Mike Fitzgerald, 905 - 887 -3386
Date: December 01, 2002
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:18 p.m., on Friday, December 6, 2002.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
756
c.
THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #12/02
January 17, 2003
The Executive Committee Meeting #12/02, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek
Pioneer Village, on Friday, January 17, 2003. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting
to order at 10:40 a.m.
PRESENT
Maria Augimeri Member
Lorna Bissell Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
REGRETS
Ron Moeser
RES.#B166/02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Lorna Bissell
Member
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #11/02, held on December 6, 2002, be approved.
CARRIED
HEARING PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158
RES. #B167 /02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Irene Jones
THAT the Committee sit as a Hearing Board.
CARRIED
757
MEMBERS PRESENT FOR HEARING:
Maria Augimeri Member
Lorna Bissell Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
Following the roll call, a hearing was held re:
Application #458 /02/VAUG to place fill in the Humber River flood plain, Villa Charities Inc.
/ Villa Colombo, Part Lot 23, Concession 8 (10443 Regional Road 27). Villa Charities Inc.
has applied to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, under Ontario Regulation
158, to place approximately 2500 cubic metres of fill within the flood plain of the Main
Humber River to facilitate the construction of a 160 bed long term care facility.
The applicants propose to place approximately 2500 cubic metres of fill within the Regional
Storm Flood Plain of the Humber River, in a Regulated Area, on Part of Lot 23, Concession 8
(10443 Regional Road 27), City of Vaughan, be refused as it affects the control of flooding.
A written staff report was submitted and a presentation was made by Ms. Sandra Malcic,
Senior Planner, York Region, Development Services Section.
A presentation was made by Mr. Roni Varone, Past President, Villa Charities Inc., and Gerard
Borean, Solicitor, Parente, Borean Barristers and Solicitors.
The Board asked questions of staff and the applicant.
RES. #8168/02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Maria Augimeri
THAT the Hearing Board consider this matter in closed session.
RES. #B169 /02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
CARRIED
THAT the Hearing Board arise and report from closed session.
CARRIED
758
DECISION OF THE HEARING BOARD
RES. #B170 /02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT Application #458 /02/VAUG by Villa Charities Inc. pursuant to Ontario Regulation
158, to place approximately 2500 cubic metres of fill within the Regional Storm Flood
Plain of the Humber River, in a Regulated Area, on Part of Lot 23, Concession 8 (10443
Regional Road 27), City of Vaughan, be refused as it affects the control of flooding.
CARRIED
MOTION TO RECONVENE
RES. #8171/02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT the Executive Committee Meeting reconvene.
MOTION TO RATIFY
RES. #B172 /02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Irene Jones
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
CARRIED
THAT Application #458 /02NAUG by Villa Charities Inc. pursuant to Ontario Regulation
158, to place approximately 2500 cubic metres of fill within the Regional Storm Flood
Plain of the Humber River, in a Regulated Area, on Part of Lot 23, Concession 8 (10443
Regional Road 27), City of Vaughan, be refused as it affects the control of flooding.
RECORDED VOTE
Maria Augimeri Nay
Lorna Bissell Nay
Michael Di Biase Nay
Irene Jones Yea
Jim McMaster Yea
Dick O'Brien Yea
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Yea
THE MOTION WAS CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, written permission from the Authority is required to:
759
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed
in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a regional
storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river,
creek, stream or watercourse.
A permit may be refused if, in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of
flooding or pollution is affected. Before refusing permission, the Authority must hold a Hearing
to which the applicant is a party.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The subject property is located on the east side of Regional Road 27, south of Nashville Road,
on the valley floor of the well defined Main Humber River Valley. The property currently
contains an abandoned Golf Driving Range and Associated Restaurant. Being located on the
Valley Floor, the entire property is within the Fill Regulated area of the Humber River, and
approximately 10% of the proposed building site is within the Regional Storm Flood Plain.
PROPOSAL
The proposal is to place approximately 2500 cubic metres of fill within the Regional Storm
Flood Plain of the Main Humber River in order to eliminate the flood susceptibility and construct
a 160 bed long term care facility of approximately 12,000 square metres (127,000 square feet).
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program
This Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) establishes
development guidelines for properties affected by valley and stream corridors. The overall
objective of the VSCMP policies are to prevent new development from occurring within areas
that may introduce risk to life and property associated with flooding, erosion, and slope
stability or that is not compatible with the protection of these areas in their natural state. The
boundaries of a valley corridor are determined as follows:
* If the valley slope is stable, a minimum of 10 metres from the top of the valley bank.
or
* If the valley slope is not stable, a minimum of 10 metres from the predicted long term
stable slope projected from the existing stable /stabilized toe (base) of slope, or the
predicted location of the toe of the slope as shifted as a result of stream erosion over a
100 year period.
In accordance with the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, no new
development is permitted within the boundaries of valley and stream corridors.
760
Notwithstanding the above, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff have been
working closely with the City on the Regional Road 27 Valley Corridor Study. As input to this
study, which is considering possible new development within the valley due to the unique
aspects of the area, the Authority, through Resolution #A141/01 as outlined below, has
indicated that they would not object to some low scale, low intensity development in a few
specific, non - hazardous areas.
THAT the City of Vaughan be advised that the Authority would not object to some low
scale, low intensity development in specific, non - hazardous areas, as set out in the staff
report.
As set out in the staff report accompanying that resolution, in the event development is further
contemplated in these areas through the Regional Road 27 Valley Corridor Study, the TRCA
would not permit modifications to hazardous areas and would be seeking further protection
and enhancement of the hazardous areas as part of any development applications.
Provincial Policy Statement (1997)
In accordance with Provincial Policy (Section 3.1.3), institutional uses, including long term care
facilities, are not permitted within hazardous lands adjacent to river and stream systems which
are impacted by flooding and /or erosion hazards.
RATIONALE
While the proposal attempts to address Provincial Policy by eliminating the flooding hazard
through the placement of fill, staff is still concerned with the siting of an institutional use on the
floor of the Humber River valley, and would be recommending evacuation in a Hurricane Hazel
type storm event.
Emergency Access
While the current proposal does include dry access (under Regional Storm conditions) to the
site off Regional Road 27 from the north, Regional Road 27 is flooded under Regional Storm
conditions to the south of the proposed site. This facility would house a large number of
elderly and disabled residents requiring additional assistance during emergency conditions.
Even without the proposed intrusions into the flood plain staff are recommending that Regional
and City emergency services personnel be consulted to discuss the implications of extensive
emergency evacuation procedures in this difficult location.
In an effort to address staffs concerns in this regard, the applicants are proposing an
emergency only access to the site at the north end of the property which is at a higher
elevation with more freeboard above the Regional Storm elevation. While staff acknowledge
the addition of a higher emergency access route, the issue of only one safe access route (from
the north) will not be mitigated.
Evaluation of Flood Plain Impact
TRCA's policies do not support the placement of fill in the regulatory flood plain given potential
impacts to the conveyance of flood flows and Toss of flood storage. This policy is stated in
Section 3.2.2 C) of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (October
1994), as follows:
761
Alteration of stream corridors (defined as the regulatory flood plain plus 10 metres), through
activities such as filling, enclosure or channelization, shall not be permitted to create additional
useable area and /or accommodate development other that (1) in a flood spill zone, or (2) in an
unusually wide flood plain with shallow depths of infrequent flooding. (p. 20).
TRCA staff has confirmed that the flood plain on the subject property is neither a flood spill
zone nor a wide, shallow flood plain.
In addition, when evaluating impacts on the control of flooding, the Authority considers both
the incremental and cumulative impacts related to the Toss of flood storage. Some of the
impacts that can be expected from loss of flood storage are increased flood flows, changes in
the frequency and therefore, risk of flooding, and an increase in the risk to loss of life and
property. On a cumulative basis, the proposal is not supported by policy because it
contributes to the impact created by cumulative loss of flood storage.
SUMMARY
The applicants have worked diligently with Authority staff in an effort to address outstanding
concerns. The original application proposed significantly more intrusion into the flood plain
(approximately 9000 cubic metres of fill). In an effort to address control of flooding issues, the
applicants submitted 6 revised plans which reduced flood plain intrusions though the use of
reduced setbacks, relocating and design modifications to parking areas and amenity spaces,
as well as design changes to the proposed facility. The subject application involves the least
intrusion into the floodplain of the concepts provided to staff and it is the position of the
applicants that the current proposal has been modified to the extent feasible from a
construction and operation standpoint and that flood plain intrusion can not be eliminated.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend that the application be refused as it will affect the control of flooding in the
following ways:
• it has the potential to affect the control of flooding upstream and downstream through the
cumulative loss of flood storage; and,
• it does not comply with Section 3.2.2 C) of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program, which states that filling within the flood plain shall not be permitted
to create additional useable area.
Report prepared by: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
For Information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: December 17, 2002
Attachments: 1
762
Attachment 1
763
SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES. #B173/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT, 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Humber River Watershed
Roybridge Holdings Ltd., CFN 33788. Purchase of property located west
of Highway No. 27, north of Highway No. 7, City of Vaughan, Regional
Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and
Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005" Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Humber River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THE EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDS THAT 8.12 hectares (20.07 acres), more or less, of
vacant land be purchased from Roybridge Holdings Ltd., being Part of Lot 8, Concession
9 and designated as Block 5 on Registered Plan 65M -3627 prepared by Schaeffer and
Dzaldov, Ontario Land Surveyors, Job No. 99215-1H, City of Vaughan, Regional
Municipality of York, west of Highway No. 27, north of Highway No. 7;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance,
subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approving the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's representative, Mr. Robert J. Gray of Gray
& Associates, Barristers and Solicitors.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
764
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition for the
Humber River Watershed. The lands are comprised of a valley corridor found along the
Rainbow Creek tributary of the Humber River.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
Based on the reatly taxes paid on TRCA land in the vicinity of the property, the taxes will be
approximatley $200 per year.
The addition of the subject property will not significantly impact TRCA's maintenance costs at
this location.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004 -11.
Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342
Date: January 03, 2003
Attachments: 1
765
As
t
d
NATURAL HI RAG LANDS OTECTION AND ACQUI MON
OJECT, 200' -2005
Flood Plain nd Conservation Component / Hi ber River Watershed
Roybridge Holdings Ltd
CFN 33788
moo, nserva o too
I
I
/ //a
SUBJECT PROPERTY
I. ;uawgOetid
RES. #B174/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Don River Watershed
Broadview Birch Properties Inc., CFN 33785. Purchase of property
located west of Hillside Drive, north of Don Valley Drive, City of Toronto
(formerly East York), under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and
Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005" Flood Plain and Conservation
Component, Don River Watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.20 hectares (0.50 acres), more or
less, of vacant land, be purchased from Broadview Birch Properties Inc., being Part of
Lot 14, Concession 2 FTB and designated as Part 42, 43, and 44 on Reference Plan
66R- 19914, City of Toronto, located west of Hillside Drive, north of Don Valley Drive;
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance,
subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the
transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to
the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approving the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's lawyer, Mr. Lloyd Solish of Solish, Felten,
Barristers and Solicitors.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition for the
Don River Watershed. The subject lands are comprised of steep valley side slope, including a 2
metre tableland buffer along the top -of -bank, within the Lower Don River valley corridor.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
This parcel of land will be turned over to the City of Toronto under the terms of the existing
management agreement.
767
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004 -11.
Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Date: December 20, 2002
Attachments: 1
768
Attachment 1
RE: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT 2001-2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Com
Broadview Birch Properties Inc. 'r
CFN 33785 1- /
vinalatirlAr imedeakier_
ljetrAr,A47,../..,
44:44,400,,S,011111,
-5, -1/
anent / Don River Watershed
Lv/ ;
„O.
ess;
I".
1.
V - FIPO•',,,, —
1
•.__. wy.Ln•AWNASIIIII/AIMAMPAMIrir.4
lip minTh ,... Iftmlomcmge.,+,4,ar
NU* itg-647.5"47 4.' 0117°1•7 ;11'9.r
1”.......7-.0-4,
7-,tgrz-- -
769
lemservafron
El= TRCA Lagos
won SUBJECT PROPERTY
RES. #B175/02 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Rouge River Watershed
1124371 Ontario Ltd., CFN 33783. Purchase of property located east of
Bayview Avenue and south of Elgin Mills Road East (north and east of
Holly Drive within subdivision 19T(R)- 00003) Town of Richmond Hill,
Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands
Protection and Acquisition Project 2001 - 2005" Flood Plain and
Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.0 hectares (2.5 acres), more or
less, of vacant land be purchased from 1124371 Ontario Ltd., being Part of Lots 24 and
25, Concession 2 and designated as Block 18 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by
Rowan - Stanciu Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors under their Project No.
20..PLANSURV(ElginM), Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, east of
Bayview Avenue and south of Elgin Mills Road East (north and east of Holly Drive within
subdivision 19T(R)- 00003);
THAT the purchase price be $2.00;
THAT the Authority receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance,
subject to existing service easements;
THAT Gardiner Roberts, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction
at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred Incidental to the closing
for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
execute all necessary documentation required.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
Resolution #A231/00, authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approving the Natural
Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.
Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's representative, Mr. Allan N. Windrem of
Dillon Consulting.
The Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in
concurrence with the purchase of the property.
Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.
770
RATIONALE
The subject property falls within the Authority's approved master plan for acquisition for the
Rouge River Watershed. The lands are comprised of a valley corridor found along the
headwaters of the Rouge River and are located within the Rouge Park North Management Plan
area.
TAXES AND MAINTENANCE
It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004 -11.
Report prepared by: George Lela, extension 5342
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Date: December 20, 2002
Attachments: 1
771
Attachment 1
RE: NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION
PROJECT 2001 -2005
Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Rouge River Watershei
1124371 Ontario Ltd.
CFN 33783
i
RAYVIEW AVE
x
TRCA LANDS
NM SUBJECT PROPERTY
11 -i. a-. • N1'
772
RES. #B176/02 - THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
Request for Permanent Easement for a section of the 9th Line Sanitary
Trunk Sewer, Duffins Creek Watershed, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville,
CFN 33784. Receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of York
to provide a permanent easement for a section of the 9th Line Sanitary
Trunk Sewer, south of Burkholder Street, east of Russel Avenue, in the
Village of Stouffville, Duffins Creek Watershed, Town of
Whitchurch-Stouffville.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of York to
provide a permanent easement for a section of the 9th Line Sanitary Trunk Sewer, south
of Burkholder Street, east of Russel Avenue, in the Village of Stouffville, Duffins Creek
Watershed, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it Is in the best interests of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Regional Municipality of York in this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.011 hectares (0.027 acres), more or
Tess, be granted to the Regional Municipality of York for a section of the 9th Line
Sanitary Trunk Sewer, said land being Part of Lot 35, Concession 9, designated as Part 6
on Reference Plan 65R -24783 prepared by David Horwood Limited, Ontario Land
Surveyor, Project No. 4532 -R7 -A;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey, and other
costs;
THAT the Regional Municipality of York is to fully indemnify the Authority from any and all
claims for Injuries, damages, or costs of any nature, resulting in any way, either directly
or indirectly, from the granting of the this easement or carrying out of construction;
THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to the
commencement of construction;
THAT an archaeological review is to be carried out with any mitigative measures being
carried out to the satisfaction of the Authority;
THAT said easement be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27, as amended;
773
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Regional Municipality of York has formally requested a permanent easement for a section
of the 9th Line Sanitary Trunk Sewer, south of Burkholder Street and east of Russel Avenue in
Stouffville. The subject site is located immediately north of the existing Stouffville Sewage
Treatment Plant which will be eventually decommissioned and is presently going through the
Schedule B Class Environmental Assessment (EA) process in this regard. The EA for the
sanitary sewer extension into Stouffville has already been approved.
The lands subject to the permanent easement are located within the Regulatory Flood Plain
and Fill Regulated Area of the Stouffville Creek. A permit application pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 was approved by the Executive Committee at Meeting #4/02 held on May 3,
2002 (Permit No. C- 02132). This section of the sanitary trunk sewer will be installed by the Bore
and Jack method beneath the channel of the Stouffville Creek. All flood plain and fisheries
issues have been addressed to the satisfaction of Authority technical staff through the review of
the permit application. No construction along this section of the sanitary trunk sewer will
commence until the permanent easement has been obtained.
The subject lands are under management with the Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville and all
issues with respect to the management of the lands will be addressed to the satisfaction of
Whitchurch - Stouffville prior to granting the easement. A temporary working easement may be
required for the proposed bore pits on both sides of the watercourse; Authority and
Whitchurch - Stouffville staff are presently discussing this matter with Region of York
Transportation and Works Department staff.
A plan illustrating the permanent easement location is attached.
Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Date: January 02, 2003
Attachments: 1
774
Attachment 1
►T�-i+
riadine
V.ip/
r� i /.t
gr 41441i.0
030 4
35
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
Request for Permanent Easement for a section of the 9th Une
Sanitary Trunk Sewer, Dutfins Creek Watershed, Town of
Whitchurch- Stouffville
rvii rnGAwns
NNW eus+acr RTY
j
775
RES.#B177/02 - THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
Request for Permanent Easement for the York/Peel Sanitary Forcemain,
Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, CFN 33618. Receipt of a
request from the Regional Municipality of York to provide a permanent
easement for the York /Peel Sanitary Forcemain, north of Steeles Avenue,
between Kipling Avenue and Islington Avenue, Humber River Watershed,
Cities of Toronto and Vaughan
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of York to
provide a permanent easement for the York/Peel Sanitary Sewer, north of Steeles
Avenue, between Kipling Avenue and Islington Avenue, Humber River Watershed, Cities
of Toronto and Vaughan;
AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the Authority that it is in the best interests of the
Authority in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation
Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Regional Municipality of York In this instance;
THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.225 hectares (0.557 acres), more or
less, be granted to the Regional Municipality of York for the York/Peel Sanitary
Forcemain, said land being Part of Lot 1, Concession 8, City of Vaughan, designated as
Part 9 on Reference Plan 65R -25425 - 0.0063 hectares (0.015 acres), more or less; Part of
Lot 40, Concession "A" Fronting The Humber, City of Toronto, designated as Part 3 on
Reference Plan 66R -19984 - 0.219 hectares (0.541 acres), more or less prepared by
Krcmar Surveyors Limited, O.L.S., (Drawings RY -V -31 and RY- V -32);
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other
costs;
THAT the Regional Municipality of York is to fully indemnify the Authority from any and all
claims for injuries, damages or costs of any nature, resulting in any way, either directly or
indirectly, from the granting of these easements or carrying out of construction;
THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to the
commencement of construction;
THAT an archaeological review is to be carried out with any mitigative measures being
carried out to the satisfaction of the Authority;
THAT the granting of these easements Is subject to the approval of the City of Toronto
who manage these lands on the Authority's behalf;
776
THAT said easement be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in
accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
C.27 as amended;
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate Authority officials be authorized and directed to
take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Regional Municipality of York has formally requested a permanent easement for the
York /Peel Sanitary Forcemain, north of Steeles Avenue, between Kipling Avenue and Islington
Avenue. The easement designated as Part 9 on Reference Plan 65R -25425 is situated north of
the Steeles Avenue right -of -way in the City of Vaughan, while the easement designated as Part
3 on Reference Plan 66R -19984 is located within the City of Toronto. A permit pursuant to
Ontario Regulation 158 for the construction of these proposed works is also in front of the
Executive Committee.
Completion of the York /Peel Sanitary Forcemain is required since many section of the existing
York - Durham Sewage System (YDSS) have either reached or are nearing their design
capacities. The approved YDSS Master Plan recommended that sewage from the Woodbridge
Service Area, currently managed by the YDSS, be diverted to the Regional Municipality of Peel
system where sufficient capacity is available.
Only the lands subject to the permanent easement located within the City of Vaughan are
situated within the Regulatory Flood Plain Regulation Fill Line of the Humber River; the City of
Toronto easement is not fill regulated, nor within the flood plain. Both easement sites are
owned by the Authority which are managed by the City of Toronto as part of the former
Thackeray Landfill Site; City staff are presently processing approvals with respect to the
granting of the easements. The project consultant acting on behalf of the Regional Municipality
York has confirmed that additional, temporary working easements will not be required since all
construction machinery will be restricted to the Steeles Avenue right -of -way.
A plan illustrating the permanent easement locations is attached.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Regional Municipality of York has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs
involved in completing this transaction.
Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Date: December 19, 2002
Attachments: 1
777
Attachment 1
i
a
en
i
0
CC 2
o —
). 15
O 4g
g
0
< :
S.2 t
z.
= c
2 1
i Z
2 A e cc
Elli
1- � .4. 10
w
et
778
RES. #B178/02 - TOWN OF CALEDON
Request for Permanent Easements for Storm Sewer Outfail and Sanitary
Sewer Connection, Humber River Watershed, Town of Caledon, CFN
33852. Receipt of a request from the Town of Caledon to provide
permanent easements for a storm sewer outfall and a sanitary sewer
connection on the north side (i.e. sanitary connection) and south side
(i.e. storm sewer location) of King Street East, east of Old King Road, in
the Village of Bolton, Humber River Watershed, Town of Caledon,
Regional Municipality of Peel
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request from the Town of Caledon to provide
permanent easements for a storm sewer outfall and sanitary sewer connection on the
north side (i.e. sanitary connection) and south side (Le. storm sewer location) of King
Street East, east of Old King Road, in the Village of Bolton, Humber River Watershed,
Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel;
AND WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives as set out
in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act to co- operate with the Town of Caledon
In this instance;
THAT permanent easements be granted to the Town of Caledon across TRCA lands
containing 0.077 hectares (0.191 acres), more or less, being Part of Lot G, Block 1 and
Part of Lot A, Block 5, Plan BOL -7, Town of Caledon, designated as Parts 1, 2, and 3 on a
plan of survey prepared by Krcmar Surveyors Ltd. under their Job No. 01 -246;
THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey, and other
costs;
THAT the Town of Caledon is to fully Indemnify and absolve TRCA from any and all
claims for injuries, damaged, or costs of any nature, resulting in any way, either directly
or indirectly, from the granting of the easements or the carrying out of construction;
THAT a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 be obtained prior to the
commencement of construction;
THAT an archaeological review is to be carried out with any mitigative measures being
carried out to the satisfaction of the Authority;
THAT the said easements be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources
In accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990,
Chapter C.27 as amended;
779
AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take
whatever action may be required to give effect thereto including the obtaining of any
necessary approvals and the execution of any documents.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Town of Caledon has formally requested permanent easements for a storm sewer outfall to
the Humber River and a sanitary sewer connection across TRCA lands as part of the
development of two (2) residential subdivisions located east of this site. Subdivision
21T-86016(C), owned by Georgian Taylor Woods Inc., and subdivision 21T-00003C, owned by
Camp Villas Corp., will both share the sanitary sewer connection on the north side of King
Street East in Bolton. Stormwater runoff from the Camp Villas Corp. subdivision will be directed
into a separate outfall off -site which does not require an easement across Authority -owned
lands. The Georgian Taylor Woods Inc. development must provide a separate storm sewer
system and outfall to the Humber River on the opposite (i.e. south side) of King Street East
which will cross TRCA lands. Both easements are located immediately east of Old King Road in
Bolton.
The easements are situated within the Regulatory Flood Plain and Fill Regulated Area of the
Humber River. An application pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 is scheduled to be
considered at Executive Committee Meeting #13/02 on February 7, 2003. Temporary working
easements will also be required to complete the proposed works; Authority and Town of
Caledon staff are presently discussing this matter with the proponents' consulting engineers.
A plan illustrating the permanent easement locations is attached.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Town of Caledon has agreed to assume all legal, survey, and other costs involved in
completing this transaction.
Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Date: January 07, 2003
Attachments: 1
780
Attachment 1
11
781
RES.#B179/02 - BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE, CITY OF TORONTO
Tender ES02 -14 - Carriage Works and Cabinet Maker's Shop. Award of
Contract ES02 -14 for the restoration of the Carriage Works and Cabinet
Maker's Shop at Black Creek Pioneer Village.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Michael Di Biase
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT J. D. Strachan
Construction Ltd. be awarded Contract ES02 -14 in the amount of $ 122,300 (excluding
GST).
AND FURTHER THAT staff, in consultation with the project Architect, Goldsmith Borgal &
Company Ltd., be authorized to approve additional unspecified expenditures to a
maximum of fifteen percent of the total cost of the work to J. D. Strachan Construction
Ltd., if deemed necessary.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 1999, the Authority approved the Future Directions Strategy for Black Creek Pioneer Village.
A major part of the strategy is the capital projects for Restoration of buildings and new
attractions infrastructure. These projects totaled $ 6 million over a five year period. This
program has been ongoing since the year 2000.
RATIONALE
Sealed bids were received from a five pre - qualified contractors which were opened Friday
December 13, 2002 at Tender Opening Sub - committee # 9/02.
Following is the list of bids received:
CONTRACTOR
BID AMOUNT
7 %
GST
TOTAL
TENDER AMOUNT
(incl. GST)
J.D. Strachan Construction Ltd.
$ 122,
300
$ 8,
561.00
$ 130,
861.00
Sandgate Construction Company Ltd.
$ 126,
000
$ 8,
820.00
$ 134,
820.00
Roof Tile Management Inc.
$ 157,
800
$ 11,
046.00
$ 168,
846.00
Summit Restoration
$ 163,
007
$ 11,
410.49
$ 174,
417.49
Maxim Group
$ 173,
220
$ 12,
125.40
$ 185,
345.40
Authority staff, in consultation with the project Architect, Goldsmith Borgal & Company have
reviewed the bids received and recommend that the Contract be awarded to J. D. Strachan
Construction Ltd in the amount of $ 122, 300, excluding GST.
782
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funding for this project is available under Account No. 503 80.
Report prepared by: Mark Preston, 416- 392 -9722
For Information contact: Jim Berry, 416- 392 -9721 or Marty Brent, extension 5403
Date: January 06, 2003
SECTION 11 - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES. #B180/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Maria Augimeri
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(9.1.1 - 9.1.5, inclusive and 9.1.20 - Monarch Construction Limited), which are listed
below.
CARRIED
CITY OF TORONTO [HUMBER YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA]
9.1.1 CATHERINE ERDLE
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 14, Plan M538, Part Lot 13, Plan, (84 Brule
Gardens), in the City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council Area), Humber
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Catherine Erdle.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of the existing two storey 3.2 m. by 7.7 m. solarium addition at the rear of the residence and the
construction of a new 1.5 m. by 13.8 m. two storey addition with basement across the back
wall of the house.
783
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Survey Plan, Site Plan, Front Elevation, West Elevation, East Elevation, Rear
Elevation, Basement Plan, and Second Floor Plan submitted by applicant, date
received January 6, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of the existing two storey 3.2 m. by 7.7 m. solarium addition at the rear of the residence and the
construction of a new 1.5 m. by 13.8 m. two storey addition with basement across the back
wall of the house on the tableland portion of the lot.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located entirely outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain of the
Humber River. The control and storage of floodwaters will therefore not be affected.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from the proposed work as the addition is located more than 250
metres from the Humber River.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed addition will be located at the rear of the residence in an area presently
occupied by the existing addition and patio area and will maintain a minimum 13 metre setback
from the top of bank of the valley slope. An existing inground pool is located between the
proposed addition and the top of bank. The proposed works are consistent with existing
development in the corridor reach and there are no slope stability /geotechnical issues
associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33889
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 6, 2003
CITY OF TORONTO [MIDTOWN COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA]
- of the Authority's Valley
Application #: 003 /03/TOR
9.1.2 ANN BEDARD
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 22, Plan 5982,
(28 York Valley Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area),
Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ann Bedard.
784
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the
construction of additions onto all 4 sides of the existing house, being entirely within the
Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Survey Plan, prepared by C. E. Dotterill Ltd. and Survey Plan revised to illustrate
proposed additions, date received December 2, 2002.
• Planit Drawing illustrating existing floor plans, date received December 2, 2002.
• Site Plan, Dwg. No. 1A, Ground Floor Plan, Dwg. No. 1, Second Floor Plan, Dwg. No.
2, Basement Floor Plan, Dwg. No. 3, Front Elevation, Dwg. No. 4, South Elevation,
Dwg. No. 5, all prepared by Kirkor Architects & Planners, date received December 2,
2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the
construction of additions onto all 4 sides of the existing house, being entirely within the
Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
Both the existing house and the proposed additions will be dry floodproofed to the Regional
Storm Flood level.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from these works as they are located approximately 150 metres
from the Don River.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is situated on the valley floor, being entirely within the Regional Storm
Floodplain of the Don River and within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area. The existing
house maintains a minimum 10 metre setback from the toe of valley slope and the proposed
additions will maintain a similar setback. The proposed development is consistent with existing
development in the corridor reach and existing grades will be maintained. There are no
significant resource features on site, nor are there any slope stability /geotechnical issues
associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1(B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
785
CFN: 33786
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: December 3, 2002
Application #: 444/02/TOR
9.1.3 BILL HOLLAND
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 33, 34, Plan
3464, (12 and 14 Knightswood Drive), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community
Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bill
Holland.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to
facilitate the demolition of two homes at No. 12 and No. 14 Knightswood Drive and to construct
one new house straddling the 2 lots, being within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don
River and within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Survey Plan dated October 22, 2002 and Lot Drainage & House Siting Control Plan,
dated November 18, 2002, both prepared by R. G. McKibbon Limited, date received
December 3, 2002.
• Ground Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan, and Basement Floor Plan, prepared by
Richard Wengle Architect Inc., dated January 7, 2003, date received January 8, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to
facilitate the demolition of two homes at No. 12 and No. 14 Knightswood Drive and the removal
of an inground pool at No. 14, in order to construct one new house straddling the 2 lots, being
within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and within the Hoggs Hollow Special
Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
The entire property is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and within
the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area. The new house will replace two existing homes and will
maintain a similar building footprint as the existing homes, having a 30 metre setback from the
watercourse. The new house will be dry floodproofed to an elevation between the minimum
350 Year flood level and the Regional Storm flood level.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the proposed works and the Don River in order to prevent
sediment from entering the watercourse.
786
Conservation of Land:
The proposed house will replace two homes and will maintain a similar 30 metre setback from
the Don River. The proposed development is consistent with existing development in the
corridor reach. There are no significant resource features on site and no fisheries or
geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment within
Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33793
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: December 6, 2002
Application #: 446/02/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO [NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA]
9.1.4 PETER MULHOLLAND & ORA ROSS
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 12, Plan 2069, (6 Mylesview Place), in
the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Peter Mulholland & Ora Ross.
The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the
installation of an inground swimming pool in the rear yard.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Revised Survey Plan and Site Plan, submitted by applicant, date received November
26, 2002.
• Letter confirming no grading works at rear of property and removal of all excess fill to
be removed from site, prepared by Paradise Pools, dated December 10, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the placement and removal of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don
River to facilitate the installation of an inground swimming pool, situated 5 metres from the
stable top of bank of the adjacent valley slope. The pool location is consistent with setbacks
along this corridor reach.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is located entirely above the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore there
will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
787
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from these works as the pool will be located more than 150
metres from the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed pool will maintain a minimum 5 metre setback from the stable top of bank and is
consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. Existing grades and vegetation will
remain and there will be no impact on any significant resource features. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33765
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: November 26, 2002
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 439/02/TOR
9.1.5 MICHAEL JOHN MARTELLACCI
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 16, Concession 8 Lot 16, Plan 65M -3377,
(297 Treelawn Boulevard), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Michael John Martellacci.
The purpose is to place fill and regrade within the Fill Regulated area of the East Humber River
to facilitate site grading and the construction of a two- storey single family dwelling within a
Registered Plan of Subdivision 65M -3377, City of Vaughan.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Grading Plan, prepared by RN Design, dated September 24, 2002, received
December 24, 2002, redlined revised to Indicate location of sediment fencing.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
788
Proposal:
The proposal consists of constructing a two- storey single family dwelling and regrading a
portion of the rear property within the Fill Regulated area of the East Humber River. The
subject property is within the Registered Plan of Subdivision 65M -3377, in the City of Vaughan.
The properties within the subdivision have been sold as individual lots. As such, prior to
construction individual lots that fall within the Fill Regulated area, will require permits pursuant
to Ontario Regulation 158. The limits of development were established during the subdivision
planning process. The proposed construction and grading will be in accordance with the
approved subdivision plan. The construction will not result in a loss of natural features.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, and therefore will
not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be erected prior to the construction and remain until the works are
complete and the construction area has been sodded to prevent sedimentation of the
watercourse. The proposed works are over 330 metres from the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The limits of development have been established for the approved subdivision. Natural
features will not be impacted by the proposed development. There are no geotechnical
concerns with the property.
Policy Guidelines:
The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (G) - Infilling, of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33888
Report Prepared by: Kellle McCormack, extension 5269
For information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: January 2, 2003
789
Application #: 002 /03/VAUG
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES.#B181/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Lorna Bissell
Maria Augimen
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(9.1.6 - 9.1.19, with the exception of 9.1.17 - H.A. Hornung Investments Ltd. which was
withdrawn), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items, for which all the
required information was received and finalized as listed below.
CARRIED
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITIES OF PEEL AND YORK AND CITIES OF TORONTO AND
VAUGHAN
9.1.6 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on (north side of Steeles
Avenue from Torbram Road to Islington Avenue), in the City of Brampton,
Etobicoke Community Council Area - City of Toronto, North York Community
Council Area - City of Toronto, City of Vaughan, Humber River and Mimico Creek
Watersheds as located on the property owned by Regional Municipalities of Peel
and York and Cities of Toronto and Vaughan.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (associated with the sanitary sewer installation) in a
Fill Regulated Area; alter seven watercourses in total (tributaries of Mimico and Humber River),
six during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) and one during the coldwater
timing window (June 1 to September 15) through a dam and pump around method to
complete the open cut crossings.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005.
• Cover Sheet for York Peel Sanitary Sewer Diversion on Steeles Avenue (Torbram
Road to Islington Avenue); Drawing G1 -Index Plan for Toronto Drawings- Contract 1;
Drawing T1 -Sta. 0 +707.460 to Sta. 0 +960; Drawing T11 -Sta. 3 +320 to Sta. 3 +600;
Drawing T13 -Sta.3 +880 to Sta. 4 +160; Drawing TD1- Construction Details; Drawing
TD2- Construction Details; Drawing TL1- Landscape Plan -Sta. 0 +707.460 to Sta.
0 +960;Drawing TL11- Landscape Plan -Sta. 3 +320 to Sta. 3 +600; Drawing
TL13- Landscape Plan -Sta. 3 +880 to Sta. 4 +160; Drawing TL21- Landscape Plan
Details and Notes;Drawing TX5 -Cross Section -N -N, Sta. 3 +352; Drawing PG1 -Index
Plan for Peel Drawings- Contract 2; Drawing P2 -Sta. 6 +120 to Sta. 6 +400;Drawing
P6 -Sta. 7 +240 to Sta. 7 +520; Drawing P8 -Sta. 7 +800 to Sta. 8 +080; Drawing P11 -Sta.
8 +620 to Sta. 8 +880; Drawing P12 -Sta. 8 +880 to Sta. 9 +180; Drawing P15 -Sta.
9 +760 to Sta. 10 +400; Drawing PX1 -Cross Section BB -BB, Sta. 6 +180; Drawing
P18 -Sta. 10 +520 to Sta. 10 +763.293; Drawing PL2- Landscape Plans -Sta. 6 +120 to
Sta. 6 +400; Drawing PL6- Landscape Plans -Sta. 7 +240 to Sta. 7 +520; Drawing
PL8- Landscape Plans -Sta. 7 +800 to Sta. 8 +080; Drawing PL11- Landscape Plans -Sta.
790
8 +620 to Sta. 8 +880; Drawing PL12- Landscape Plans -Sta. 8 +880 to Sta. 9 +180;
Drawing PL15- Landscape Plans -Sta. 9 +760 to Sta. 10 +040; Drawing PL18- Landscape
Plans -Sta 10 +520 to Sta. 10 +763.293; all received December 16, 2002; all prepared
by Earth Tech.
• Drawing T8 -Sta. 2 +500 to Sta. 2 +760; Drawing T9 -Sta. 2 +760 to Sta. 3 +040; all
received September 27, 2002; all prepared by Earth Tech.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions); dated January 15, 2003; received
January 15, 2003; prepared by the Region of York.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal: .
The project involves the installation of twin 900mm sanitary sewer forcemains along the north
side of Steeles Avenue from Islington Avenue to Torbram Road. There are a total of ten
watercourse crossings involved within the Mimico and Humber watersheds. The three largest
crossings will be tunneled and the remaining seven crossings will be conducted by open cut.
All of the watercourse crossings have an upstream drainage area greater than 125 hectares
which indicates a Regional Storm Floodplain. Four of the ten crossings are located within a Fill
Regulated Area. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment
process in 1999. This "Peel Diversion Project" was identified in the York Durham Sewage
System Master Plan as a priority. A report from the Property Section has also been submitted
to the Executive Committee for consideration at the January 17, 2003 meeting regarding a
permanent easement of 0.2 hectares /0.5 acres on the north side of Steeles between Kipling
and Islington Avenues.
Control of Flooding:
Final grades will match existing within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore, there will be
no impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, coffer dam, rock flow check, catchbasin silt trap,
dewatering trap, mud mat, erosion control blankets) will be implemented to ensure that the
construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The distances from the
inverts of the watercourses to the obverts of the sanitary sewer pipes have been reviewed and
it has been determined that there will not be future erosion problems. All sending and receiving
tunnel pits will be located a minimum of 10 metres from the top of banks:
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be no in stream work associated with the three crossings by tunneling, (Mimico
Creek east of Airport Road, West Humber River west of Highway 50, and Humber River west of
Islington Avenue) therefore, there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss in these
locations. There will be in stream works associated with seven watercourse crossings by open
cut through a dam and pump around method. The timing windows have been indicated on the
plans for all the open cut crossings with six of the seven crossings having a warm water
window, and one unnamed watercourse in the Humber River watershed at Martin Grove Road
791
with a coldwater window. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a
harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and TRCA
staff will be able to issue a Letter of Advice on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and
Oceans (DFO). None of the crossings will require a DFO authorization. The proposed works
will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. TRCA's Archaeologist investigated the
proposed works on TRCA's lands. Since the portion of lands to be disturbed is relatively small,
TRCA's Archaeologist agreed to allow Archaeological Services Inc. (ASI) to conduct the
archaeological investigation on behalf of TRCA. When the ASI report has been reviewed by
TRCA staff and a clearance has been received from TRCA's archaeologist, staff will be in a
position to issue the "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit, pending Executive
Committee approval.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32884.A
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: January 7, 2003
CITY OF BRAMPTON
Application #: 047 /02 /BRAM
9.1.7 CASA -NORTH INVESTMENTS INC.
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
Lot 13, Concession 6 , (Mountainash Road Crossing of H2 Watercourse), in the
City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Casa -North Investments Inc..
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place and remove fill within the Regional Storm
Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a vehicular culvert crossing and a watermain
crossing of the watercourse.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2008.
• Grading Plan, drawing No. 21, prepared by Rand Engineering, dated May 2001,
revised April 2002, and sealed January 14, 2003.
• Mountainash Road Plan & Profile, drawing No. 28, prepared by Rand Engineering,
dated May 2001, revised May 22, 2002, and sealed January 14, 2003.
• Construction Staging and Sediment Control Plan - Mountainash Road - South,
drawing No. 69B, prepared by Rand Engineering, dated May 2001, revised April 2002,
and sealed January 14, 2003.
• Con -Span Culvert Detail, Drawing No. 69, prepared by Rand Engineering, dated
September 2000, revised May 22, 2002, and sealed January 14, 2003.
• Letter of Undertaking to address minor ecology concerns and obtain necessary
clearances from DFO and the City of Brampton, prepared by Robert Hooshley of
Metrus Development, dated January 15, 2003.
792
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place and remove fill within the Regional Storm
Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a vehicular culvert crossing and watermain crossing
of the watercourse. This is one of four separate permit applications being considered at this
Executive meeting encompassing 3 culvert crossings, 2 watermain crossings, and 1
stormwater outfall, at 3 separate locations along the H2 tributary of the West Humber River.
The H2 tributary is a warm water system extending from a point just southwest of Bramalea
Road and Countryside Drive to a point of convergence with another Humber tributary just
southeast of Williams Parkway and Goreway Drive. This tributary has been subject to several
previous disturbances including an online pond and many culvert crossings as a result of
previous residential developments in this general area.
The proposed watermain crossing will utilize jack and bore methodology ensuring that the
bore pits will be setback at least 10 metres from the watercourse and the crossing depth will be
at least 2 metres below the base of the watercourse.
This proposed vehicular crossing will facilitate the connection of the recently constructed
Sandalwood Parkway, just east of Bramalea Road. The vehicular crossing structure is an open
footed, 10.9 metre wide, Conspan culvert. The crossing span does not completely conform
with the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policy recommendation that
crossings span the meander belt width; which has been preliminary determined as 54 metres
at this location. As a result, the crossing will require a realignment of the watercourse as it
enters and exits the culvert and some minimal armour stone protection in the floodplain and at
the footings near the entrance of the culvert to minimize future maintenance needs. The
realignment, which will require approval from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO),
will be compensated by the removal of an existing drop structure just downstream from the
crossing location. This drop structure restricts fish migration throughout this reach of the
watercourse.
The master planning for this development area was completed in 1988 and was not subject to
current municipal review standards which would include a Master Environmental Servicing
Plan. As such, the crossing locations and designs were not subject to current Authority
preliminary review standards for ecological concerns. Thus the applicant has based their
preliminary design standards and budgetary parametres on the existing culvert crossings
within this reach and previous policy standards considered during the approval of the
Sandringham Wellington Secondary Plan. Authority staff have consulted with DFO and
Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) staff and are prepared to support this proposal based
upon the aforementioned considerations and the previous disturbances to this tributary.
Control of Flooding:
The proposal is not expected to result in any significant impacts to the conveyance and
storage of stormwater flows as the culvert opening has been sized according to Regional
Storm volumes and velocities.
793
Pollution:
The proposal includes the use of sediment and erosion control fencing along with pea gravel
coffer dam techniques to protect against the overland migration of sediment into the
watercourse. All excavated material will be removed immediately from the work area and
disturbed areas will be restored with appropriate landscape materials following construction.
Conservation of Land:
The in stream works will take place between July 1 and September 15, as directed by the
Ministry of Natural Resources, to protect against potential impacts to certain sensitive fisheries
within this watercourse. There are no significant geotechnical concerns associated with this
application and all disturbed areas will be addressed through the implementation of the
voluntary restoration plan.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies in part with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33761
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: November 25, 2002
Application #: 433 /02 /BRAM
9.1.8 CITY OF BRAMPTON
To alter a waterway on Lot 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, Concession 1, 2, in
the City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned
by City of Brampton.
The purpose is to remove fill in order to conduct culvert maintenance along the Etobicoke
Creek.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005.
• Site Plan and Details Page: culvert numbers C12a, C12b on the East side of the
Etobicoke Creek between Valonia Drive and Foster Crescent, prepared by City of
Brampton, received by TRCA December 04, 2002.
• Site Plan and Details Page: culvert Number C21 on the north side of the Etobicoke
Creek, south of Pressed Drive, prepared by City of Brampton, received by TRCA
December 04, 2002.
• Site Plan and Details Page: culvert Number C23b on the north side of the Etobicoke
Creek south of Brickyard Way, prepared by City of Brampton, Received by TRCA
December 04, 2002.
• Site Plan and Details Page: culvert Number C24 south of Williams Parkway on the
west side of the Etobicoke Creek, prepared by City of Brampton, Received by TRCA
December 04, 2002.
• Site Plan and Details Page: culvert Number C26 on the west side of the Etobicoke
Creek east of Calvertdale Road, prepared by City of Brampton, Received by TRCA
December 04, 2002.
794
• Site Plan and Details Page: culvert Number C27 on the east side of the Etobicoke
Creek 60 metres north of culvert C26, prepared by City of Brampton, Received by
TRCA December 04, 2002.
• Site Plan and Details Page: culvert Number C28 on the west side of the Etobicoke
Creek north of Vodden Street East, prepared by City of Brampton, Received by TRCA
December 04, 2002.
• Site Plan and Details Page: culvert Number C29 on the east side of the Etobicoke
Creek north of Vodden Street East, prepared by City of Brampton, Received by TRCA
December 04, 2002.
• Site Plan and Details Page: culvert Number C34 on the west side of the Etobicoke
Creek east of Ken Whillans Drive, prepared by City of Brampton, Received by TRCA
December 04, 2002.
• Site Plan and Details Page: culvert Number C37 on the east side of the Etobicoke
Creek west of Scott Street, prepared by City of Brampton, Received by TRCA
December 04, 2002.
• Site Plan and Details Page: culverts at Vodden Street Bridge on the east side of the
Etobicoke Creek, prepared by City of Brampton, received by TRCA December 04,
2002.
• Terrafence Details, prepared by Terrafix Geosynthetics Inc., submitted by City of
Brampton, received by TRCA December 04, 2002.
• Cofferdam Stream Crossing Details, prepared by M.T.R.C.A., submitted by City of
Brampton, received by TRCA December 04, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of removing fill from sewer outfalls along multiple points on the
Etobicoke Creek, in order to clear out debris and sediment from the outfalls. The works are a
standard maintenance requirement of the City of Brampton to ensure that their sewer outfalls
are operating effectively and free from obstruction. All of the works will take place outside of
the creek, with pea gravel coffer dams inside the outfall channel to isolate the works and
ensure that the sediment does not enter the creek. The majority of the works will take place
several metres from the waters edge, and all excavated sediment will be immediately removed
from the site.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works will have no negative impact on the storage or conveyance of flood
waters as the removal of the sediment will allow the sewers to function according to capacity
designs.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be erected as required to prevent sediment from entering the
watercourse. Coffer dams will be placed inside the outfalls to ensure that the excavated
sediment does not enter the creek. All disturbed areas will be restored to the existing
conditions, and all excavated fill will be removed from the site.
795
Conservation of Land:
The works will take place within the Fisheries Warmwater Timing Window, with no works taking
place between April 1 to June 31. Disturbance to the riparian vegetation will be minimized and
all disturbed areas will be restored to the existing conditions. There are no geotechnical issues
associated with this application.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33719
Report Prepared by: Erin Pratley, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: November 6, 2002
Application #: 423 /02 /BRAM
9.1.9 SANDRINGHAM PLACE INC.
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 13, 14, Concession 5,
(Sandalwood Parkway East), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Sandringham Place Inc..
The purpose is to place and remove fill within the Regional Storm Floodplain to facilitate the
construction of a watermain crossing of the watercourse..
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2008.
• Grading Plan, drawing No. 21, prepared by Rand Engineering, dated November 2001,
revised August 20, 2002, sealed January 14, 2003, and redline revised to remove
outfall details January 15, 2003.
• Sandalwood Parkway East Plan & Profile, drawing No. 58, prepared by Rand
Engineering, dated November 2001, revised October 18, 2002, sealed January 14,
2003, and redline revised to remove outfall details January 15, 2003.
• Construction Staging and Sediment Control Plan - Sandalwood Parkway East,
drawing No. 67C, prepared by Rand Engineering, dated November 2001, revised
August 8, 2002, sealed January 14, 2003, and redline revised to remove outfall details
January 15, 2003.
• Storm Sewer Outfall / Watermain Crossing Details - Sandalwood Parkway East,
drawing No. 67, prepared by Rand Engineering, dated March 2002, sealed January 14,
2003, redline revised to remove outfall details January 15, 2003.
• Letter of Undertaking to address minor ecology concerns and obtain necessary
clearances from DFO and the City of Brampton, prepared by Robert Hooshley of
Metrus Development, dated January 15, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
796
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within the Regional Storm Floodplain to facilitate the
construction of a watermain crossing of the watercourse. This is one of four separate permit
applications being considered at this Executive meeting encompassing 3 culvert crossings, 2
watermain crossings, and 1 stormwater outfall, at 3 separate locations along the H2 tributary of
the West Humber River. The H2 tributary is a warm water system extending from a point just
southwest of Bramalea Road and Countryside Drive to a point of convergence with another
Humber tributary just southeast of Williams Parkway and Goreway Drive. This watermain
crossing is at the same location and the proposed Sandalwood Parkway vehicular crossing.
The watermain will be installed by the jack and bore methodology, ensuring that the bore pits
are setback at least 10 metres from the watercourse and the crossing depth is at least 2 metres
below the base of the watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
This proposal will not result in any impacts to the storage and conveyance of storm flows.
Pollution:
The proposed boreholes will be setback at least 10- metres from the watercourse and will be
surrounded by sediment and erosion control fencing to prohibit the overland migration of
sediment into the watercourse. All excavated materials will be removed from the work area and
all disturbed areas will be restored following construction.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this application.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33760
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: November 25, 2002
Application #: 434 /02 /BRAM
9.1.10 SANDRINGHAM PLACE INC.
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 13, 14, Concession 5, (Sunny
Meadow Boulevard), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Sandringham Place Inc..
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place and remove fill within a Regional Storm
Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall, a vehicular culvert crossing, and
a watermain crossing of the watercourse.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2008.
• Grading Plan, Drawing No. 23, prepared by Rand Engineering, dated November 2001,
sealed January 14, 2003.
797
• Sunny Meadow Boulevard Plan & Profile, Drawing No. 53, prepared by Rand
Engineering, dated November 2001, sealed January 14, 2003.
• Storm Sewer Outfall / Watermain Crossing Details - Sunny Meadow Boulevard,
Drawing No. 67B, dated November 2002, sealed January 14, 2003.
• Construction Staging and Sediment Control Plan - Sunny Meadow Boulevard,
Drawing No. 67D, dated November 2001, sealed January 14, 2003.
• Letter of Undertaking to address minor ecology concerns and obtain necessary
clearances from DFO and the City of Brampton, prepared by Robert Hooshley of
Metrus Development, dated January 15, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place and remove fill within a Regional Storm
Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a stormwater outfall, a vehicular culvert crossing, and
a watermain crossing of the watercourse. This is one of four separate permit applications
being considered at this Executive meeting encompassing 3 culvert crossings, 3 watermain
crossings, and 1 stormwater outfall, at 3 separate locations along the H2 tributary of the West
Humber River. The H2 tributary is a warm water system extending from a point just southwest
of Bramalea Road and Countryside Drive to a point of convergence with another Humber
tributary just southeast of Williams Parkway and Goreway Drive. This tributary has been
subject to several previous disturbances including an online pond and many culvert crossings
as a result of residential development in this general area.
The watermain crossing will utilize jack and bore methodology ensuring that the bore pits will
be setback at least 10 metres from the watercourse and the crossing depth will be at least 2
metres below the base of the watercourse.
The outfall structure will service an adjacent draft approved plan of subdivision. The outfall will
be located approximately 10 metres from the watercourse and will include a naturalized low
flow channel connection to the tributary.
The proposed vehicular crossing will facilitate the connection of the recently constructed Sunny
Meadow Boulevard, just east of Bramalea Road. The crossing structure is an open footed,
10.9 metre wide, Conspan culvert. The crossing span does not completely conform with the
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program policy recommendation that crossings span
the meander belt width; which has been preliminary determined as 33 metres at this location.
Watercourse realignment is not required at this location due to the orientation of the
watercourse relative to the crossing location, however minimal amounts of armour stone will be
required within the floodplain and at the culvert footings to avoid future maintenance problems.
798
The master planning for this development area was completed in 1988 and was not subject to
current municipal review standards which would include a Master Environmental Servicing
Plan. As such, the crossing locations and designs were not subject to current Authority
preliminary review standards for ecological concerns. Thus, the applicant has based their
preliminary design standards and budgetary parameters on the existing culvert crossings
within this reach and previous policy standards considered during the approval of the
Sandringham Wellington Secondary Plan. Authority staff have consulted with staff from the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and
are prepared to support this proposal based upon the aforementioned considerations and the
previous disturbances to this tributary.
Control of Flooding:
The proposal is not expected to result in any significant impacts to the conveyance and
storage of stormwater flows as the culvert opening has been sized according to Regional
Storm volumes and velocities and the outfall grading will not result in any significant changes
to the existing elevations within the Region Storm Floodplain.
Pollution:
The proposal includes the use of sediment and erosion control fencing along with pea gravel
coffer dam techniques to protect against the overland migration of sediment into the
watercourse. All excavated material will be removed immediately from the work area and
disturbed areas will be restored with appropriate landscape materials following construction.
Conservation of Land:
The in water works will take place between July 1 and September 15, as directed by the
Ministry of Natural Resources, to protect against potential impacts to certain sensitive fisheries
within this watercourse. There are no significant geotechnical concerns associated with this
application and all disturbed areas will be restored following construction.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies in part with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33795
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: December 6, 2002
Application #: 447 /02 /BRAM
9.1.11 SANDRINGHAM PLACE INC.
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 13, 14, Concession 5,
(Sandalwood Parkway East), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as
located on the property owned by Sandringham Place Inc..
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place and remove fill within the Regional Storm
Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a vehicular culvert crossing of the watercourse.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2008.
799
• Grading Plan, drawing No. 21, prepared by Rand Engineering, dated November 2001,
revised August 20, 2002, sealed January 14, 2003, and redline revised to remove
outfall details, January 15, 2003.
• Sandalwood Parkway East Plan & Profile, drawing No. 58, prepared by Rand
Engineering, dated November 2001, revised October 18, 2002, sealed January 14,
2003, and redline revised to remove outfall details, January 15, 2003.
• Construction Staging and Sediment Control Plan - Sandalwood Parkway East,
drawing No. 67C, prepared by Rand Engineering, dated November 2001, revised
August 8, 2002, sealed January 14, 2003, and redline revised to remove outfall details,
January 15, 2003.
• Letter of Undertaking to address minor ecology concerns and obtain necessary
clearances from DFO and the City of Brampton, prepared by Robert Hooshley of
Metrus Development, dated January 15, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place and remove fill within the Regional Storm
Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a vehicular culvert crossing of the watercourse. This
is one of four separate permit applications being considered at this Executive meeting
encompassing 3 culvert crossings, 3 watermain crossings, and 1 stormwater outfall, at 3
separate locations along the H2 tributary of the West Humber River. The H2 tributary is a warm
water system extending from a point just southwest of Bramalea Road and Countryside Drive
to a point of convergence with another Humber tributary just southeast of Williams Parkway
and Goreway Drive. This tributary has been subject to several previous disturbances including
an online pond and many culvert crossings as a result of residential development in this
general area.
This proposed crossing will facilitate the connection of the recently constructed Sandalwood
Parkway, just east of Bramalea Road. The crossing structure is an open footed, 10.9 metre
wide, Conspan culvert. The crossing span does not completely conform with the Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program policy recommendation that crossings span the
meander belt width; which has been preliminary determined as 33 metres at this location. As a
result, the crossing will require a minor straightening of the watercourse as it exits the culvert
and some minimal armour stone protection in the floodplain and at the footings near the
entrance of the culvert to minimize future maintenance needs.
The master planning for this development area was completed in 1988 and was not subject to
current municipal review standards which would include a Master Environmental Servicing
Plan. As such, the crossing locations and designs were not subject to current Authority
preliminary review standards for ecological concerns. Thus, the applicant has based their
preliminary design standards and budgetary parameters on the existing culvert crossings
within this reach and previous policy standards considered during the approval of the
Sandringham Wellington Secondary Plan. Authority staff have consulted with staff from the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and
are prepared to support this proposal based upon the aforementioned considerations and the
800
previous disturbances to this tributary. Finally, as a result of unauthorized works within the
watercourse at this location, the applicant is subject to ongoing investigations by DFO and
MNR. The applicant is currently working with staff members of the Authority, DFO and MNR to
garner approval for a voluntary restoration plan at this location which will need to be approved
prior to the release of an Authority permit and implemented as part of these works.
Control of Flooding:
The proposal is not expected to result in any significant impacts to the conveyance and
storage of stormwater flows as the culvert opening has been sized according to Regional
Storm volumes and velocities.
Pollution:
The proposal includes the use of sediment and erosion control fencing along with pea gravel
coffer dam techniques to protect against the overland migration of sediment into the
watercourse. All excavated material will be removed immediately from the work area and
disturbed•areas will be restored with appropriate landscape materials following construction.
Conservation of Land:
The works will take place between July 1 and September 15, as directed by the Ministry of
Natural Resources, to protect against potential impacts to certain sensitive fisheries within this
watercourse. There are no significant geotechnical concerns associated with this application
and all disturbed areas will be addressed through the implementation of the voluntary
restoration plan.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies in part with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33808
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For Information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: December 10, 2002
CITY OF PICKERING
Application #: 448 /02 /BRAM
9.1.12 THE PICKERING HARBOUR COMPANY LTD.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 26, Plan M89,
(1295 Wharf Street), in the City of Pickering, Waterfront Watershed as located on the
property owned by The Pickering Harbour Company Ltd.
The purpose is to conduct shoreline improvemerits by placing stone, remove and construct a
new boardwalk and relocate an existing boat hauler within the Regional Storm Floodline and
Fill Regulated Area for the Frenchman's Bay Watershed.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005.
801
• Red Line Revised Plan for Shoreline Improvements, Pickering Harbour Company,
prepared by Shoreplan Engineering Limited, Drawing Nos. Sheet 1 and Sheet 2,
Project 02 -565, as received on January 14th, 2003.
• Letter of Undertaking regarding a red line revision requirement for the proposed
sediment control works, as provided by Shoreplan Engineering Limited as received of
January 15th, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to improve the shoreline of the existing Frenchman's Bay Marina by
placing stone at the shoreline edge, removing and constructing a new cantilevered boardwalk
and relocating an existing boat hauler. The works are within the Regional Storm Floodline and
Fill Regulated Area for the Frenchman's Bay Watershed. Rip Rap stone will be placed at the
water's edge and will replace in part, an existing sheet pile wall. New decking will be
cantilevered over the stone to provide access to the existing boat slips. The existing boat
hauler will be moved from the north end of the property to the south end of the property to
facilitate the redevelopment of the tableland portion of the property. Minor changes to grade
will occur on the adjacent tableland to ensure a smooth transition between the works and the
adjacent development. Filling of the bay is not proposed. The works are consistent with
planning approvals granted by the Ontario Municipal Board.
Control of Flooding:
There will be no impact on the control of flooding as all works will occur at the edge of
Frenchman's Bay and bay filling is not proposed.
Pollution:
A temporary silt curtain will be erected to stop the migration of sediments into Frenchman's
Bay in accordance with plans submitted by the applicant.
Conservation of Land:
The works will improve the existing shoreline and provide for a more fish friendly water's edge.
In addition there will be a vegetated buffer with the future redevelopment of the adjacent
tableland.
Policy Guidelines:
The works are in compliance with Section 4.2.2 Property Improvements of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33768
Report Prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: November 26, 2002
802
Application #: 440 /02 /PICK
CITY OF TORONTO [EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA]
9.1.13 CITY OF TORONTO
To place fill within a regulated area on (Dawes Road - Goodwood Park Court to
Massey Creek), in the City of Toronto (East York Community Council Area), Don
River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to
facilitate the construction of a new 25 metre section of watermain to tie into the existing
watermain from Goodwood Park Court to Massey Creek, on the east side of Dawes Road.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005.
• Dawes Road from Goodwood Park Court to Massey Creek Bridge (North of Crescent
Town Road), 300 mm Watermaln Construction, Drawing Nos. U -88 -001, U -88 -002,
U -88 -003, & U -88 -004, prepared by SRM Associates, dated November 2002, date
received January 10, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to
facilitate the construction of a new 25 metre section of watermain to tie into the existing
watermain from Goodwood Park Court to Massey Creek, on the east side of Dawes Road. The
new watermain section will terminate approximately 15 metres south of Massey Creek and will
not involve any instream works.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located outside the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore there will be
no impact to the control of flooding.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the proposed works and the watercourse to prevent
construction - generated sediments from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored following construction and no riparian vegetation will be
impacted. There will be no instream works associated with the project and standard sediment
and erosion control measures will be implemented. There are no fisheries or slope stability
issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
803
CFN: 33893
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 7, 2003
Application #: 004 /03/TOR
CITY OF TORONTO [HUMBER YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA]
9.1.14 WORKS & EMERGENCY SERVICES CITY OF TORONTO
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Northeast section of High Park,
Southwest Corner of Bloor Street West and Parkside Drive, in the City of Toronto
(Humber York Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed as located on the
property owned by Works & Emergency Services City of Toronto.
The purpose is to construct structures (headwall, stilling basin, weir modifications) within a
Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (Spring Creek) by drawing down the on -line
ponds in order to excavate and to work in the dry while constructing the headwall. The subject
property is not located within a Fill Regulated Area, however, it is located within a Fill Extension
Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005.
• Cover Sheet; Drawing Numbers U- 3997 -G1- Overall Site Plan; G2 -Plan -Lower Pond;
G3 -Plan Upper Pond; G4- Typical Pond Sections; G5- Spring Creek Pond Sections;
G6- Headwall and Stilling Basin Details; G7- Existing Tree Numbers; all dated
September 2001; all Engineer Stamped November 13, 2002;a11 received November 18,
2002; prepared by MacViro.
• LA1- Landscape Plan; LA2- Landscape Details; all dated September 2001; all Engineer
Stamped November 13, 2002; all received November 18, 2002; all prepared by
CH2MHILL.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions as per TRCA's January 10, 2003
letter); dated January 14, 2003; received January 15, 2003; prepared by the City of
Toronto.
• Letter Indicating that baseflows will be maintained in Spring Creek during
construction; dated January 10, 2003; received January 10, 2003; prepared by
MacViro.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
804
Proposal:
The proposal involves enlarging two existing on -line sedimentation ponds on Spring Creek in
High Park. The ponds will be deepened and widened, the existing headwall will be removed
and replaced with a new one and a stilling basin. The existing maintenance access road from
Parkside Drive will be upgraded and planting and landscaping will be completed in and around
the perimeter of the ponds. The site is not regulated for fill excavation and placement. The
upstream drainage area , although located within storm sewers, is greater than 125 hectares.
There is a Regional Storm Floodplain associated with this watercourse. Future works will
involve the repairing of the existing erosion protection along approximately 260 metres of
Spring Creek further south. This repair will be addressed as a separate permit. A Class
Environmental Assessment was completed for the project in 1999 and the proposed works will
result in an overall improvement to the quality of Spring Creek and the ponds. The need to
expand the ponds was originally identified in the Sewer System Master Plan which was
conducted for the former City of Toronto in the early 1990's.
Control of Flooding:
The on -line pond will be increased in sized and the excavated material will be removed from
the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore, there will be no negative impacts to flood storage or
conveyance.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, pump, splash pad) will be implemented to
ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Enlarging the
ponds and planting native aquatic plants within the ponds will improve the presently degraded
water quality.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. The
ponds are not considered to be fish habitat since they are man -made, there is a control
structure at the outlet and since the ponds are cleaned out every 2 -3 years. The ponds are
considered to be stormwater management facilities, therefore a fisheries assessment and
authorization will not be required. The works will be handled with a Letter of Advice on behalf
of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. A warmwater timing window will be enforced for
the construction of the headwall only. All other in water works will not require a timing
restriction as per consultation with the Ministry of Natural Resources. The project site is located
within an Environmentally Significant Area and an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest. The
tree inventory and removal plan indicated that only four native trees are scheduled for removal.
Since the removals have been kept to a minimum, staff is of the opinion that there will be no
major impact to the terrestrial resource.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32703
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: January 8, 2003
805
Application #: 364/01/TOR
CITY OF VAUGHAN
9.1.15 JOE PANDOLFO
To construct in a flood plain on Lot 5, Concession 4 Plan 64 -7994, (7601 Jane
Street), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Joe Pandolfo.
The purpose is to construct a pedestrian bridge across the Black Creek within the Regional
Storm Flood Plain on the Paradise Banquet Hall grounds.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005.
• Drawing No. A -2, date last revised January 2003, received January 13, 2003, prepared
by Robert Segarra Architect Inc. - redline revised to prohibit any filling or grade
changes to slopes below top of bank, and for silt fencing to be maintained for the
duration of construction.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
To construct a pedestrian bridge over the Black Creek on the grounds of an existing banquet
hall facility for use by patrons of the facility. The prefabricated bridge will be placed on footings
sufficiently set back from the stable top of bank on either side of the watercourse. The site of
the proposed pedestrian bridge is adjacent to an existing driveway crossing that provides
vehicular access from Jane Street.
Control of Flooding:
The bridge will be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, but staff have determined that
the impact on the control of flooding will be negligible.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be placed along the limit of construction and the equipment access route, in
order to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with this project and no significant
natural heritage features will be affected. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and restored to
their original condition.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
806
CFN: 33649
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For Information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: October 16, 2002
Application #: 392 /02/VAUG
9.1.16 JOE SERPA
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 6, Plan M2917, (42 Intersite Place), in the
City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Joe
Serpa.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within the Fill Regulated area of the East Humber
River, in order to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool and landscaping
works at the existing dwelling.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005.
• Letter of undertaking dated January 15, 2003, from Joe Serpa, stating that all of
TRCA's concerns will be addressed prior to construction.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is located adjacent to the East Humber River valley corridor, and is
located entirely within the Fill Regulated area. The proposed works involve excavating and
placing fill in order to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool and landscaping
works to the existing dwelling. The subject property is part of an existing residential
neighbourhood in the City of Vaughan. The proposed works are contained with the property
boundary by a chain - linked fence and will not result in a loss of natural features.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, and therefore will
not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sedimentation is not expected to occur from the proposed works. All work is to be located
over 62 metres from the watercourse. All excavated material will be removed from site.
Conservation of Land:
Conservation of Land: All disturbed areas will be resodded following construction. All
construction equipment will gain access to rear year via the east side yard. All works are
sufficiently setback from the valley corridor. The proposed works are consistent with existing
development in the corridor reach, as a neighbouring property has a pool in the rear yard. No
slope stability /geotechnical issues are associated with the project. The proposed works will
impact no significant resource features and there are no outstanding concerns with regard to
the plant materials proposed for landscaping.
807
Policy Guidelines:
The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (E) — Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33782
Report Prepared by: Kellie McCormack, extension 5269
For information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: January 2, 2003
TOWN OF AJAX
Application #: 001 /03NAUG
9.1.17 H.A. HORNUNG INVESTMENTS LTD.
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 4, Concession RANGE 2 Part 1 Plan
40R -1670, (Shoal Point Road), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as
located on the property owned by H.A. Hornung Investments Ltd..
• Withdrawn
TOWN OF MARKHAM
9.1.18 ANGUS GLEN DEVELOPMENT LTD.
To alter a waterway on Lot 19, Concession 5, (Southwest corner of Kennedy Road
and Sixteenth Avenue), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located
on the property owned by Angus Glen Development Ltd.
The purpose is to construct a stormwater outfall to the Bruce Creek to service a portion of a
draft approved residential plan of subdivision (19T- 95026); and to construct three crossings
underneath the Creek with one sanitary sewer line and two watermain lines, in order to service
the Angus Glen Community Centre and Library.
The permit will be issued for the period of December 6, 2002 to December 5, 2004.
• Letter of Undertaking dated January 10, 2003 from Sabourin Kimble & Associates Ltd.,
that agrees to address all comments provided by TRCA in their letter dated January
10, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
808
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a stormwater outfall to the Bruce Creek in order to service a
portion of a draft approved residential plan of subdivision (19T- 95026) located to the east. The
proposal also consists of augering underneath the watercourse with one sanitary sewer line
and two watermain lines. The crossings will service the Angus Glen Community Centre and
Library located to the north. Also part of the proposal is to construct a temporary access road
in a fill regulated area in order to access the site. The access road will not cross the
watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
Proposed grades will match existing and all excess fill will be removed from the site, so that the
control of flooding will not be affected.
Pollution:
A sediment and erosion control plan, accepted by staff, will be implemented on site for the
duration of construction, in order to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical issues related to the proposal and no significant natural heritage
features will be affected. As there will be no instream works conducted, staff have determined
that the proposal does not constitute a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish
habitat, pursuant to The Fisheries Act. A Letter of Advice will be issued to the applicant upon
release of the permit to mitigate any potential impacts to fish habitat. All disturbed areas will be
stabilized and restored in accordance with Authority landscaping guidelines.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in compliance with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33621
Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: October 1, 2002
Application #: 377 /02 /MARK
9.1.19 TOWN OF MARKHAM
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 9, Concession 4 , (Warden Avenue
Watermain installation -from 14th Avenue northward to Highway 7), in the Town of
Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of
Markham.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for watermain installation) in a Fill Regulated Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2005.
• Drawing No. P5 -Sta. 3 +067.5 to 3 +367.5; Drawing P6 -Sta. 3 +367.5 to Sta. 3 +667.5;
Warden Avenue Watermain -from 14th Avenue to South of Highway 7; dated July 2002;
received August 29, 2002; prepared by MacViro.
809
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions as per the MacViro letter dated
December 20, 2002, received December 23, 2002); dated December 18, 2002; received
December 24, 2002; signed by the Town of Markham.
• Ontario Provincial Standard Drawing 219.240- Sedimentation Basin; Silt Fence Detail;
received August 28, 2002; submitted by MacViro.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the installation of a trunk watermain (750mm dia. concrete pressure
pipe, 400 mm dia. polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe and 900mm dia. steel tunnel liner) along the
west side of Warden Avenue from 14th Avenue northward to just south of Highway 7. The
Rouge River will be crossed via a tunnel method, whereas north and south of the Rouge will
constructed through an open cut method. A Fill Regulation Line and a Regional Storm
Floodplain are associated with the Rouge River. The Warden Avenue watermain was reviewed
by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process.
Control of Flooding:
The Rouge River crossing will be tunneled from 9 metres at the south side of the river to 8.5
metres north of the river. With the tunnel method, the elevations within the Regional Storm
Floodplain will be maintained. The exit pits will be located 7 metres from the tops of banks.
Given that all works within the floodplain will maintain existing grades there will be no impact
on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, sedimentation basins) will be implemented to
ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Anti - seepage
collars will be installed to minimize the potential impacts to groundwater and river baseflow
since the watermain may act as a conduit otherwise. The Geotechnical report has been
reviewed by staff and the distance from the invert of the creek to the obvert of the tunnel liner is
satisfactory to avoid future erosion problems, and the soil material is satisfactory to avoid
slumping during tunneling.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be no in stream work associated with the project, therefore, there will be no
concerns related to fish habitat Toss. The proposed works will impact no significant resource
features.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33483
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: January 7, 2003
810
Application #: 349 /02 /MARK
TOWN OF AJAX
9.1.20 MONARCH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 4, 5, Concession 2, in the Town of Ajax,
Carruther's Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Monarch
Construction Limited.
The purpose is to construct a sanitary trunk sewer via jack and bore method under Carruther's
Creek in the Town of Ajax, Durham Region. The sanitary trunk sewer will extend north along the
east side of the Creek from Highway 2 (at the south end) to Rossland Road (at the north end).
The works are within the Regional Storm Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of January 17, 2003 to January 16, 2008 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• General Plan Sanitary Easement G -101 for Monarch Construction Limited, prepared
by Sernas Associates dated June 2002, received November 14, 2002.
• General Plan Sanitary Easement G -102 for Monarch Construction Limited, prepared
by Sernas Associates dated August 2002, received November 14, 2002.
• Sanitary Easement Plans P -101, P -102, P -103, P -104, P -105, P -106, P -107, P -108,
P -109 for Monarch Construction Limited, prepared by Sernas Associates dated July
2002, received November 14, 2002.
• Sanitary Drainage Area Plan G -101A for Monarch Construction Limited, prepared by
Sernas Associates dated July 2002, received November 14, 2002.
• External Sanitary Drainage Area Plan G -102A for Monarch Construction Limited,
prepared by Sernas Associates dated June 2002, received November 14, 2002.
• A Letter of Undertaking pertaining to Restoration Plans and Drainage Trench Plugs,
prepared by Sernas Associates dated January 15, 2003, received January 15, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a sanitary trunk sewer via jack and bore method under the east
side of Carruther's Creek in the Town of Ajax. The works are within the Regional Storm
Floodplain and Fill Regulated Area and will facilitate development to the north. The sewer will
extend from Highway 2 (at the south end) to Rossland Road (at the north end). The alignment
will traverse cultivated farmland in the central and north portions, and grassy fields with sparse
vegetation in the southern portion of the site and is located partially within the stream corridor
but removed from the meander belt. There is also a creek crossing at the south end near
Highway 2, which will be carried out by jacking and boring. There will be no interference with
the watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
Given that the sanitary trunk sewer will be located underground, there will be no impacts to the
control of flooding.
811
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures (i.e., silt fence) will be implemented on the site and
maintained during the construction project to ensure that construction - generated sediment
does not enter the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
No significant resource features will be affected by the proposed works and all disturbed areas
will be restored in accordance with restoration plans submitted by the applicant and approved
by TRCA staff. The sewer alignment is considered stable and is sufficiently setback from
Carruther's Creek as noted in the geotechnical and erosion investigation dated June 2002,
received on August 20, 2002 and reviewed and approved by Authority technical staff.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33639
Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: October 8, 2002
RES. #B182/02 - VEHICLE ACQUISTIONS
The acquisition of replacement vehicles.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
Application #: 387 /02 /AJAX
THAT tender FM2002 -01: 2 new 2003 4 +4 Chassis Trucks with Hydraulic Dump Boxes be
awarded to King City Motor Sales for the sum of $83,145.00, it being the lowest tender
received and meeting the specifications.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority's Policy and Procedures for the Purchase of Goods and Services and Disposal of
Equipment requires the Executive Committee approval for selection of successsful tenders for
acquistions between $ 25,000 and $100,000.
The replacement of vehicles is determined by the condition of the vehicle including the
mechnical fitness(cost/benefit of repairs,)use of the vehicle, age and mileage or hours of use.
The members of the Tender Opening Sub - Committee at their meeting opened tenders for the
vehicles on December 6, 2002. The tenders were referred to staff for their review and report to
the Executive Committee Meeting #12/02 on January 17, 2003.
812
Tender Opening Sub - Committee Report - FM 2002 -01 2 NEW 2003 4 +4 Chassis Trucks
with Hydraulic Dump Boxes
Company
Tendered Price
King City Motors
$83,145.00
Alex Irvine Motors Ltd.
$83,846.50
Marvin Starr Pontiac Buick Cadillac
Inc.
$84,492.20
Funds for the acquisitions of vehicles are available from account code 701 -11 -404.
Report prepared by: Jim Tucker, extension 5247
For Information contact: Jim Tucker, extension 5247
Date: December 30, 2002
RES. #B183/02 - MARINE ARCHAEOLOGY SERVICES
Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project. To increase the McQuest
Marine Science Limited contract for the completed marine archaeological
survey for the Port Union Waterfront Improvement Project.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THAT the McQuest Marine Science Limited contract for the completed marine
archaeological survey for the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project be extended
by an amount of $28,000, excluding G.S.T., bringing the firm's total consulting contract to
$43,000 excluding G.S.T.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
At meeting #14/00 held on February 2, 2001, the Executive Committee adopted Resolution
#B212/00
"THAT McQuest Marine Science Limited be retained to undertake a marine archaeological
survey for the Port Union Waterfront Improvements Project at an upset limit of $15,000 plus
G.S.T."
813
McQuest Marine Science Limited has completed the Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment of
Shoreline and Offshore Areas for the Port Union Pedestrian Node as outlined in the original
proposal for services. The proposal described the methods and approach to be used to
undertake both an offshore and shoreline investigation along with the types of equipment used
to conduct the underwater investigation. Estimates were provided regarding time in the field,
for components of work such as the diving survey, analysis and report preparation and for
mobilization and demobilization. McQuest Marine Sciences worked with the TRCA
Archaeologist and the Coastal Ecology Unit to minimize expenses during the investigation.
During the first diving session, an abundance of asbestos was identified in the water at the foot
of Port Union Road. Additional investigation work was undertaken to determine the extent of
the asbestos, the source and to identify any potential impacts it may have on the divers
conducting the survey. The Ministry of Labour was consulted and subsequent diving surveys
followed the guidelines and requirements of the Ministry of Labour.
Upon completion of the Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment, TRCA met with the Ministry of
Tourism, Culture and Recreation to review the heritage resources along the Port Union
shoreline. Based on the information provided to the Ministry additional information was
requested for not only the area south of Port Union Road but also for the length of shoreline
immediately east of Highland Creek where additional heritage resources were found. TRCA
was required to prepare a report that documented the heritage resources along the entire
length of Phase I of the Project (Highland Creek to west of Chesterton Shores), identify any
potential impacts the Project may have on these resources, and how the TRCA would mitigate
such impacts.
Through extensive consultation on the survey and reporting requirements with McQuest Marine
Sciences Limited and their contractors, the TRCA and the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and
Recreation, all requirements for a Ministry decision on the Heritage Resources Plan were met
and resulted in a timely approval of the Project. This enabled the TRCA to meet its timelines
and allowed construction to begin in September 2002.
RATIONALE
The total expenses incurred for this marine survey, were required to address the additional
scope of work required by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Recreation and the
Environmental Assessment approval for the Project. Also, due to the availability of the
consultants and equipment, the timing of the surveys was less than optimum. The winter
months made it difficult to mobilize equipment and to undertake the diving component of work
so additional summer sessions of work were added to complete the surveys. TRCA staff has
reviewed the expanded scope of work required to complete the survey and has approved each
additional phase of work. Staff are recommending approval of the contract increase and
additional expenditures for the completed archaeological survey incurred under staff direction.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The additional $28,000 expenditure for this consultant contract increase is provided within
Account No. 223 -01.
For Information contact: Nancy Gaffney, extension 5313
Date: December 17, 2002
814
RES.#B184/02 - MAPLE SYRUP TENDER CA02 -001
Contract for the supply of pre - packaged maple syrup.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THAT the contract for supply of pre - packaged maple syrup be awarded to Robinson's
Maple Products, involving minimum total estimated expenditures of $45,926.50.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In October of 2002, the original tender packages were sent to five Ontario Maple Syrup
Producers and in November we received two quotes. Upon examination of the bids, it was
determined that confusion arose from the wording of the tender in regards to the specification
of bottles. In order to ensure the bidders are given equal and fair opportunities, staff clarified
the wording and re- issued the tender to all original vendors.
The overall tendered costs on both quotes were relatively close, with Robinson's Maple
Products providing the lowest bid meeting our specifications. Robinson's Maple Produects
supplied packaged maple syrup to Bruce's Mill and Kortright prior to 2002 for a number of
years. As a result, staff thereby recommend the tender be awarded to Robinson's Maple
Products.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Funds for the supply of pre - packaged and bulk maple syrup are available from account code
801 -16 -888
For information contact: Mike Fitzgerald, 905 - 887 -3386
Date: January 6, 2002
Attachments: 1
815
Attachment 1
Summary of Quotations for Tender CA02 -001 - Pre - Packaged Maple Syrup
SMOKEY KETTLE MAPLE COMPANY LTD.
ROBINSON'S MAPLE PRODUCTS
Tendered Price
$46,582 40
$45,676.50
Delivery ( if Extra)
N/A
Total
Total
$46,582.40
816
ROBINSON'S MAPLE PRODUCTS
Tendered Price
$45,676.50
Delivery (if Extra)
$250.00
Total
$45,926.50
816
RES.#B185/02 - RAP FISH TUMOUR ASSESSMENT
Award of contract related to consulting services for the review and
assessment of the status of fish tumours and other deformities as an
impaired beneficial use within the Toronto Area of Concern - Toronto
RAP MOU 2002 -2003
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THAT the firm of Gartner Lee Limited be retained to undertake a review and assessment
of the status of fish tumours and other deformities as an impaired beneficial use within
the Toronto Area of Concern, for a total cost not to exceed $9,975.00 (excluding GST).
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 1987, the Toronto and Region was identified along with 41 other areas around the Great
Lakes as a contaminated "hot- spot," by the International Joint Commission (IJC).
Subsequently, the IJC developed fourteen criteria to define the environmental degradation in
these Areas of Concern (AoC) around the Great Lakes. They are expressed as impairments of
beneficial uses (IBUs), and the Toronto and Region AoC exceeds eight of them, with another
three suspected of being impaired but requiring further assessment. One of the identified
impaired beneficial uses which requires further assessment relates to Fish Tumours and other
Deformities.
The 2001 RAP Progress Report "Clean Waters, Healthy Habitats" lists this IBU as "Probably not
impaired, but requires further assessment." It concludes that although existing information
suggests that the problem is not widespread nor severe, there is insufficient evidence to
change the designation of this beneficial use from "requires further assessment" to "not
impaired."
Although unequivocal information on fish tumours and deformities across the Toronto AoC is
still not available, anecdotal reports from biologists working along the Toronto waterfront
suggest that serious external deformities are rarely observed. However, surveys of fish in the
tributaries reveal fairly high incidence of various types of tumours.
The 2001 RAP Progress Report recommends the need to survey the incidence of liver tumours
and external deformities in white suckers and brown bullheads to compare the situation in the
Toronto AOC with Tess polluted areas on the Great Lakes. In order to move forward with the
assessment of this IBU, a detailed analysis of the existing data and assessment methods is
required, along with discussions among the various stakeholders associated with the Toronto
RAP and experts in the field of fish tumours and deformities.
The basic questions to be answered are as follows:
1. Are fish tumours /deformities a problem in the Toronto AoC? What constitutes a fish
tumour /deformity IBU, and what has been done at other RAP sites to identify and quantify
this impairment? Based on this is it an Impaired Beneficial Use in the Toronto AOC?
817
2. What is the best (standardized) method to assess or measure the impairment? I.e. which
types of tumours /deformities are contaminant induced, and how is this determined?
3. What are the measurable "thresholds" or "targets" related to fish tumours and deformities?
How will we assess improvement? Is there a dose - response curve for tumours /deformities
(related to sediment or water chemistry), and if so are there surrogates (i.e. PAH
concentration in sediment) that could be used to address the question of IBU?
4. With respect to all of the above, is additional data collection required or feasible in order to
assess the IBU, and if so what is the workplan that is needed to commence this activity
starting in the 2003 field season?
Consulting services are required to undertake a qualitative and quantitative assessment of
information and data available for the Toronto AoC, in order to address the questions identified
above. This will include but is not limited to a literature review of relevant information from the
Great Lakes Basin; a review of current techniques to provide the further assessment required;
recommendations for further sampling, including sampling schedules, protocols, and costs;
the identification of thresholds /targets to which progress can be measured, and; the
identification of probable causes (supporting data) for tumors /deformities if available, that can
be used to develop cause and effect relationships between environmental conditions and
tumors /deformities found.
The consultant will be expected to:
• Review relevant published and unpublished information and data, including, but not limited
to data previously collected in the Toronto AoC, Hamilton Harbour AoC and other RAPs
elsewhere in the Great Lakes Basin.
• Conduct a review of the current monitoring and analysis techniques used to identify and
measure the presence of external and internal tumours and deformities in fish.
• Develop, coordinate and facilitate a 1 day workshop that brings together stakeholders and
Regional experts to discuss the information reviewed /collected along with the available
data for the Toronto and other AoCs, sampling methods, protocols, analysis, and to agree
upon assessment targets or thresholds to be used in the Toronto AoC.
• Prepare a report that; synthesizes the literature review; incorporates the results of the
facilitated workshop, addresses the questions identified above, makes recommendations
for a monitoring and assessment program, and provides the framework for a multi -year
workplan (if necessary).
In this regard, staff prepared a detailed request for proposal and forwarded it to a list of
consultants for their consideration. Proposals and bids were received from two of the five
consulting firms approached, as follows:
Gartner Lee Limited
Aquafor Beech Limited
Golder Associates
Tarandus Associates Limited
Stantec Incorporated
$9,975.00 (excluding GST)
$8,000.00 (excluding GST)
no bid
no bid
no bid
818
Staff have reviewed the proposals and are recommending that although the firm of Gartner Lee
Limited was not the lowest bidder, they be awarded the contract for this project. Although both
of the firms that responded are likely capable of providing the services required, it was evident
by the proposals submitted that Gartner Lee Ltd. had a clearer understanding of the project
requirements and detailed a much better workplan for the completion of the required tasks.
Further Gartner Lee Ltd. brings previous directly obtained experience related to the Toronto
RAP process and research related to the Impaired Beneficial Uses that have been identified in
the Toronto AoC.
RATIONALE
In order to ultimately delist the Toronto AoC, all of the impaired beneficial uses identified must
be monitored for improvement. This detailed analysis of existing data and assessment
methods is required move forward with the assessment of this particular IBU. The information
gained through this assessment will be reported through the TRCA's Watershed Report Cards
and RAP Progress Reports. In addition, any future assessment and monitoring can be
integrated into the Authority's Regional Watershed Monitoring and ongoing Waterfront
Monitoring programs.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Upon awarding of the contract, the successful firm will initiate the required literature review, as
well as the collection of data and information for discussion at a facilitated stakeholder
workshop. The final report is to be made available to the Authority by March 31, 2003.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Project details and funding for this work has been identified in the Toronto RAP MOU
2002 -2003. Account number 124 -41 has been set -up for this project.
Report prepared by: Scott Jarvie, extension 5312
For Information contact: Scott Jarvie, extension 5312
Date: January 07, 2003
RES.#B186/02 - YORK PEEL DURHAM GROUNDWATER STUDY — DRILLING OF KEY
BOREHOLES IN DURHAM REGION
Transfer of funding for Durham Region drill programs.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THAT $17,054.73 be transferred to Durham Region as the YPD portion of the drilling costs
for construction of a key anchor borehole drilled in Uxbridge.
819
AND FURTHER THAT $27,500.00 be transferred to Central Lake Ontario Conservation
Authority as the YPD portion of a key anchor borehole drilled in the east part of Durham
Region.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 2002 the Authority approved a strategic work plan for the York Peel Durham groundwater
study. The work plan consisted of a number of initiatives that were started in the 2002 calendar
year. Funding for the projects was obtained through the Ministry of the Environment as well as
from the Regions of York, Peel and Durham, and the City of Toronto. For the 2002 calendar
year some funding remained to be allocated to projects.
Late in 2002, as part of the Region of Durham's groundwater program in Uxbridge, the
opportunity arose to supplement the Region's drilling program from the YPD Groundwater
Management Strategy project in order to advance the borehole beyond the target aquifer to the
bedrock and in order to collect a core sample of the sediment. The project was discussed by
the YPD Steering Committee, consisting of hydrogeologists and planners from the various
partner agencies (Regional Municipalities as well as Conservation Authorities), and it was
agreed that the Uxbridge area was of sufficient regional interest that the project should be
funded from the YPD budget.
At the same time Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority was planning to drill a borehole
in the eastern part of Durham near the community of Ashburn. Through discussions with the
Geological Survey of Canada it was determined that this borehole might prove more useful if it
were moved east to coincide with a geophysical survey that was undertaken in the mid 1990's.
CLOCA agreed to move the borehole and in discussions with the YPD Steering Committee it
was determined that this borehole would also be of interest from a regional point of view and
that it should be partially funded from the YPD budget.
Both boreholes fulfill the mandate of the YPD Groundwater Management Strategy Study in that
they add solid geological information that will be used to assist in constructing the regional
groundwater model in Durham. Both boreholes were completed late in 2002.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
The recommended total transfer of $44,554.73 will be sufficient to meet the final cost
requirements for the two boreholes. Upon approval of this report, staff will make the necessary
arrangements to have the funds transferred to the Region of Durham and CLOCA. There are
sufficient funds in the York Peel Durham Groundwater Management Strategy Study (Account
#115 -90) budget to cover the costs of the above projects.
For Information contact: Steve Holysh, 905 - 336 -1158, extension 246
Date: August 26, 2002
820
RES.#B187/02 - GTA TASK FORCE ON ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD REFORM
TRCA Submission. Approval of the comments to be delivered from The
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to the GTA Task Force on
OMB Reform on January 20, 2003.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THAT Bruce Ketcheson, Solicitor with Ritchie, Green and Ketcheson, LLP, be authorized
to provide the comments outlined in the staff report to the GTA Task Force on OMB
Reform on behalf of The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
CARRIED
INTRODUCTION
The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority ( "the TRCA ") appreciates the opportunity to
present to you today its comments on the role and function played by the Ontario Municipal
Board.
Under Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, the TRCA has the mandate to establish
and undertake, within its watershed area, a program designed to "...further the conservation,
restoration, development and management of natural resources... ". In fulfilling this
responsibility, the Authority is involved in many aspects of conservation including the
protection, enhancement and regeneration of natural systems; information transfer and advice
relating to sound land management; community involvement in environmental projects;
outdoor recreation; and environmental education.
Over the last few years, Authority staff increasingly have been called upon to participate in
proceedings before the Ontario Municipal Board arising from appeals launched under the
Planning Act, and related legislation. In part, this involvement has arisen from the expanded
role of the Authority in providing technical support to municipalities related to the review of
various environmental issues associated with applications for development approval. As well,
there appears to be an increased public recognition of the need to incorporate protections to
the long -term preservation of natural heritage systems and functions within the context of the
land use planning process.
Through its participation in these matters, the experience of the Authority in many cases has
involved hearings that have been protracted, expensive and contentious. Given current
funding realities, the allocation of staff time and financial resources required to respond to
these types of proceedings are often onerous.
821
The Authority recognizes the need for a body, such as the Ontario Municipal Board, to resolve
disputes that arise as the result of the review of planning applications. However, the TRCA
believes that the best planning process is achieved where there is a clear vision from the outset
of what we should be trying to plan for; sufficient time and resources provided to undertake the
appropriate level of review; and adequate opportunity for public consultation and discussion.
Having regard to the foregoing, the TRCA believes that there are a number of shortcomings in
the current OMB process that need to be addressed. These are discussed below.
NEED FOR COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO PLANNING
It is the position of the TRCA that the notion of "smart growth" should be based upon a
recognition that development approvals that occur on a "piecemeal basis" may result over time
in cumulative impacts to the ecology of a much larger area. If these types of cumulative
impacts are not recognized, and planned for, there is a real risk that with on -going
development will come gradual loss of biodiversity and natural function.
It has been the experience of the Authority that the current process of planning appeals to the
OMB is not particularly well adapted to respond to these types of long -term concerns for
sustainable communities. A number of the reasons for this limitation are as follows:
1. Decisions are made by the OMB under the Planning Act having regard to matters of
Provincial Interest, Provincial Policy Statement ( "the PPS ") and conformity with
municipal Official Plans. Many of these policies are very general, conflicting and open to
interpretation in each particular case. From the perspective of the Authority, there is a
need, especially at the Provincial level, for a much stronger and clearer legislative and
policy direction to address Natural Heritage strategies through the planning process.
Similar policies also should be incorporated within Official Plan documents. In that
regard, the Authority supported the initiative of the Province to adopt such an approach
in responding to development pressures experienced within the Oak Ridges Moraine.
2. Since proceedings before the Board are considered "hearings de novo ", where
decisions are based solely on the evidence presented, in most OMB hearings the focus
is directed at site specific issues arising from the individual appeals rather than
considering the cumulative impacts associated with on -going development.
3. At the present time there is no effective means for the Board to monitor the results of its
decisions. As a result, assumptions arising from evidence presented at the hearing,
involving mitigation of impacts, is never subsequently verified after development
proceeds.
4. The Authority has also noted, in some cases, that developers will file site - specific
appeals with the Board in order to preserve their rights under existing Official Plan
policies, where the municipality proposes to undertake a review of those policies. Their
ability to initiate such appeals, under these circumstances, carries with it the potential to
undermine the comprehensive nature of the planning exercise. The Authority believes
that where it is apparent that such appeals have been filed solely for strategic purposes,
the hearing of these appeals should generally be considered premature pending
completion of the larger study process.
822
TIME FRAMES ASSOCIATED WITH APPEALS:
As a result of amendments made to the Planning Act in the mid- 1990's, the appeal periods to
the Ontario Municipal Board for many planning matters were reduced to 90 days. As a result,
in many cases developers will have an incentive to file applications with the municipality and
then appeal to the Board prior to the local planning review process having been completed.
In many cases, it is unrealistic to expect a proper review of a development proposal to be
completed within this 90 day period. Many of the cases with which the Authority becomes
involved raise complex scientific and engineering issues. TRCA staff are often pushed to
respond to applications where information provided by the applicants is incomplete or simply
not forthcoming prior to the appeal.
Given the adversarial nature of the Boards process, once appeals have been lodged the timing
for production of reports, and provision of agency comments in response thereto, is often
driven by the efforts of the developer to secure an early hearing date and the requirements to
respond to procedural directions governing the production of witness statements and reply
materials. In a number of OMB cases where the Authority has been involved, staff have had to
address the production of large amounts of new data and analysis tendered either shortly
before the commencement of the hearing or in some cases after the hearing is underway. As a
result, the Authority has found it necessary to divert considerable staff and financial resources
to responding to these appeals, often at the expense of dealing with other on -going workload.
It is the position of the Authority that the current appeal periods of 90 days should be
lengthened and that the requirements for perfecting an application, in order to commence the
appeal period, toughened. Many municipalities now offer pre - consultation meetings to
developers, where the information required to be submitted to the municipality is confirmed
before the application is accepted. Provision should be made within the Planning Act for this
information to include all necessary studies and data sets identified by the municipality
The Authority also believes that there should be a greater emphasis placed at the OMB level on
screening appeals, in advance of hearings, to ensure that all necessary information exchanges
required to address issues have been exchanged, and that an adequate opportunity has been
afforded for technical review. A greater emphasis should be placed by the Board on the
resolution of issues prior to hearings, through the meetings of expert witnesses and the
production of statements of agreed fact.
RECOVERY OF COSTS
As noted above, one of the realities associated with participation in OMB proceedings is that
substantial costs will be incurred as parties "gear up" for a hearing. Where appeals are
forwarded to the Board by developers, there is often substantial pressure exerted on the
Authority to respond in short time - frames on complex issues that will be addressed through the
proceedings. Since by virtue of the appeal the appellant is often able to compel an expedited
review of their application by staff, the Authority believes that there should be some
responsibility on the part of the appellant to indemnify the Authority for these additional costs.
For Information contact: Brian Denney, 416 - 667 -6290
Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214
Date: January 16, 2003
823
RES. #B188/02 - RECRUITMENT PROCESS FOR THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
January 17, 2003. Recruitment of the Chief Administration Officer for the
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Conservation
Foundation of Greater Toronto.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Lorna Bissell
THAT the selection process as described in the Human Resource Manager's report be
approved;
AND FURTHER THAT an estimated $30,000 to $35,000 in costs for advertising and
consultants be approved.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The recruitment of the Chief Administration Officer for the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority and the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto, will follow a similar framework
as the previous search process of 1992. In addition, we will be engaging the use of
Consultants to assist in the Selection process.
The Framework
1. The Posting of the Advertisement of Chief Administration Officer.
The ads for the CAO positions will be inserted in the following media
• Local municipalities
• Other Conservation Authorities
• Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment
• TRCA Website
• The Globe and Mail
• Toronto Star
• National Post
The posting information will be sent to executive placement firms and other career
transition organizations.
Timing
January 17th to February 21st, 2003 for public posting.
Closing of 5:OOPM, February 21st, 2003 for all applications.
2. The Competencies of the Chief Administration Officer.
Sue Simington, President of lnnovacom and the facilitator of the current Strategic
Planning process for the Authority, will be engaged to develop a comprehensive list of
competencies needed for the CAO position.
824
These competencies would include:
• A degree in Environmental Sciences, Planning, Engineering or related disciplines.
• Existing network of contacts at all levels of Government with senior staff and
elected officials.
• An understanding of the relationship between various levels of government and
NGO's.
• Senior leadership in the areas of governance and management in a not for profit
environment.
• An understanding of Sustainability, Watershed Management, Environmental
issues and Policy Development.
• Excellent Communications and Advocacy skills.
Once the competencies have been identified, the list will be reviewed with the Chair of
the Authority, Andrea Belanger from ABAI consulting and a third external individual with
an understanding of and direct experience with Conservation Authorities. The external
consultant and individual have been selected to assist in our search for a CAO due to
their involvement with the environmental sector and their understanding of governance,
governmental and watershed issues and experience with Conservation Authorities.
3. Screening.
An external HR consultant group will be hired to assist Ms. Belanger and the external
Conservation Authority contact with a screening process after the posting has closed
and the resumes have been received. The external HR Consultant, Andrea Belanger
and our Conservation Authority expert will review the resumes and select 10 -20 for
further consideration. Prescreening telephone interviews and if required, a short
personal interview with these top 10 -20 candidates will be carried out.
The purpose of this prescreening interview process of the selected 10 -20 applicants is
to assess the strategic fit of the candidates with the competencies needed by a new
CAO. Based on these prescreening interviews, the top 6 -8 candidates will then be
selected for presentation to the Selection Committee.
Timing
Development of pre- screening questions January 31st, 2003.
Pre - screening telephone interviews with the top 10 -20 candidates February 24th to March
5th, 2003
825
4. The Selection Committee - The Two Team Approach.
Andrea Belanger and the HR consultant can be used as resources for the Selection
Teams on an ad hoc basis, throughout the process. The HR consultant will be present
at the personal interviews and can be used as a resource by the two Selection Teams.
The Selection process will be based on at least two interviews. The first interview will be
undertaken by Team One which will interview the selected 6 -8 candidates. The second
Team will then do the final interview of a shorter list of potential candidates.
The mandate of the Team One is to recommend to the Second Team, the top 3 -4
candidates for the second round of interviews. The first interview team is
recommended to consist of the following members:
The Vice Chair Jim McMaster
Authority Members
Bas Balkissoon (Toronto)
Dave Barrow (York)
Ian Sinclair (Peel)
Anthony Ketchum (Adjala - Tosorontio /Mono)
Team Two is recommended to consist of the Executive Committee of the Authority plus
the President of the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto. The mandate of
Team Two will be to recommend their nominee for the CAO position to the Full
Authority. The following will make up the Team Two:
Dick O'Brien, the Chair
Jim McMaster, the Vice Chair
Maria Augimeri
Lorna Bissell
Michael Di Biase
Irene Jones
Ron Moeser
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Don Wood, President of the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto.
5. Timing.
The top 6 -8 candidates, recommended by our external consultants, will be
contacted and one hour personal interviews will be scheduled between March
10th to April 2nd, 2003 by the first Team. Interview questions will be drafted for the
interviews.
Team Two, the Executive Committee , plus the Foundation President will meet on
April 4th from noon to 4:00 PM for the second set of personal interviews of the 3 -4
candidates as recommended by Team One.
826
The recommendation for a new CAO must have the consensus of the Executive
Committee. If a consensus cannot be made at that time, a third interview stage may
have to be arranged.
6. Process.
The Executive Committee will recommend a new CAO to the full Authority at their
regularly scheduled meeting of April 25, 2003. Upon Authority approval, a letter of offer
will be sent to the successful candidate after the April 25th meeting.
7. The Full Authority Meeting May 16, 2003.
The newly hired CAO will be presented to the Authority by the Chair of the Authority.
8. The Aftermath.
The resumes and interview notes will be kept for 10 years to meet the legal
requirements of employment. All materials will be held in confidence with access to
historical files subject to approval of the Chair of the Authority.
An announcement will be made and a press release sent out after the Authority meeting
identifying the new CAO and a brief bio.
The media release will be sent out on the day of the May Authority meeting.
For Information contact: Catherine MacEwen, extension 5219
Date: January 16, 2003
NEW BUSINESS
RES. #B189/02
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Maria Augimeri
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
WHEREAS Anthony Ketchum is a Member of the Authority;
AND WHEREAS the Authority does financially support Member attendance at
conferences and relevant educational programs;
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT Mr. Ketchum's request to have the Authority
share in the tuition costs for a course on sustainability at Schumacher College in Devon,
England be approved, at an amount not to exceed $1,200.00
CARRIED
827
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:40 p.m., on Friday, January 17, 2003.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
eTHE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #13/02
February 7, 2003
The Executive Committee Meeting #13/02, was held in the Humber Room, Head Office,
on Friday, February 7, 2003. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:47
a.m.
PRESENT
Michael Di Biase Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Ron Moeser Member
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
REGRETS
Maria Augimeri Member
Lorna Bissell Member
Irene Jones Member
RES. #B190 /02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #12/02, held on January 17, 2003, be approved.
CARRIED
SECTION 1- ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION
RES.#B191/02 - TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION
Proposed Streetcar Loop at Lake Shore Boulevard West and Parklawn
Road, City of Toronto (West Community). Receipt of a request from the
Toronto Transit Commission for agreement in principal to protect TRCA
lands at Humber Bay Park West located on the south west corner of
Lake Shore Boulevard West and Parklawn Road for a future expansion of
the Park Lawn bus loop to allow both streetcar and bus operations, City
of Toronto (West Community)
829
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Michael Di Biase
Ron Moeser
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS the Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Toronto Transit
Commission (TTC) to provide agreement In principal to protect TRCA lands at Humber
Bay Park West located on the south west corner of Lake Shore Boulevard West and
Parklawn Road for a future expansion of the Park Lawn bus loop to allow both streetcar
and bus operations, City of Toronto (West Community);
AND WHEREAS the subject lands are managed by the City of Toronto in accordance with
the terms and conditions of an agreement dated October 11, 1972;
THAT TTC be advised that TRCA is in agreement in principal with the protection of TRCA
lands for a future expansion of the Park Lawn bus loop to allow both streetcar and bus
operations as set out on the sketch attached to the staff report dated January 28, 2003,
subject to the following conditions:
a) That TTC obtain agreement for this proposal from the City of Toronto's Economic
Development, Culture and Tourism department;
b) Prior to commencing construction of the expansion of the Park Lawn bus loop, the
City of Toronto and TRCA be provided with the detailed construction drawings for
review and approval;
c) Prior to commencing construction, an archaeological review is to be carried out if
deemed necessary by TRCA, with any mitigative measures being carried out at the
expense of TTC to the satisfaction of TRCA;
d) The cost of the construction and the relocation of park infrastructure is to be at TTC's
expense.
BACKGROUND
A streetcar loop was approved on the east side of Legion Road, north of Lake Shore Boulevard
West, as part of the 1993 Waterfront West LRT Environmental Assessment. Since that time, the
designated land uses in the Legion Road area have changed, and City of Toronto staff
expressed concern that a streetcar loop would not be compatible with their modified plans for
this area. Also, TRCA has recently approved the Bonar Wetland project located on the east
side of Legion Road north of Lake Shore Boulevard West. The construction of the streetcar
loop at this location would have an impact on the project.
Recently, TTC has undertaken an evaluation of other potential streetcar loop options in the
vicinity of Legion Road. As a result of this evaluation, considering such criteria as benefit to
transit customers, costs, and community impacts, TTC staff concluded that the best alternative
would be to modify the existing bus loop on TRCA lands on the south west corner of Lake
Shore Boulevard West and Parklawn Road at the entrance to Humber Bay Shores and Humber
Bay Park West.
830
Prior to TTC releasing its interest in the Legion Road site, TTC requires a commitment from
TRCA that it agrees in principal with the modifications to the Parklawn Road site for streetcar
use.
TRCA staff has met with TTC staff and, based on these discussions, TTC staff has modified
their proposal to incorporate to the extent possible, the proposed streetcar loop within the
existing bus loop, given the constraints of the turning radius of streetcars, to minimize the
impacts on surrounding TRCA lands.
Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension 5223
For Information contact: Ron Dewell, extension 5245
Mike Fenning, extension 5223
Date: January 28, 2003
Attachments: 1
831
Attachment 1
•
*•
i I
It
GI
1O
air
Iowan-rove rid
YAM
to
0
m 3
E
m °o
Z��
O0
co 3
O o
03o
co 03 p
Fs iv-
Q o
Ogg
C
a;
• all
cc Y
0
lj
SECTION I1- ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES. #B192/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Ron Moeser
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.1 - 8.1.12, inclusive, and 8.1.29 - Runnymede Development Corporation Limited),
which are listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF PICKERING
8.1.1 RAYMOND BINNS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 90, 91, Plan 283, (486 Rougemount
Road), in the City of Pickering, Rouge River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Raymond Binns.
The purpose is to excavate and replace fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to
facilitate the construction of a one storey solarium addition on piers onto the rear of the existing
residence.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Red -line Revised Site Plan and Construction Drawing prepared by Perma -Wood
Solariums, date received January 16, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
833
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and replace fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to
facilitate the construction of a one storey solarium addition on piers onto the rear of the existing
residence, approximately 8 metres from the top of bank of the valley slope.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the
conveyance and storage of floodwater will not be impacted.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the proposed works and the top of bank to prevent the
overland migration of construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse
approximately 60 metres away. All excess fill will be removed from the site.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed addition is consistent with existing development in the corridor reach and will
involve a 1.8 m. (6 ft.) extension onto the rear of the existing house. The addition will maintain
a 8 metres setback from the stable top of bank. There are no slope stability /geotechnical
issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(C) - Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33954
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 20, 2003
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
Application #: 028 /03 /PICK
8.1.2 CITY OF TORONTO
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on
(Burnhamthorpe Road over Etobicoke Creek, west of Mill Road), in the City of
Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Etobicoke Creek Watershed as
located on the property owned by City of Toronto.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the installation
of a 300 mm by 1.6 m. CSP culvert at the northwest bridge abutment through the existing
gabion blanket and outletting into Etobicoke Creek, in order to alleviate a localized drainage
problem on the sidewalk.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
834
• Burnhamthorpe Road Bridge over Etobicoke Creek, Rehabilitation of MW Road,
General Arrangement, Dwg. No. 345- S3250 -36, Sheet No. 2, prepared by R.V.
Anderson Associates Limited, dated November 2002, date received December 23,
2002.
• Sedimentation Control Fence Std. T219.130 -01.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The City of Toronto proposes to install a small 300 mm. by 1.6 m. CSP culvert at the northwest
corner of the Burnhamthorpe Road bridge over Etobicoke Creek, in conjunction with the
proposed bridge rehabilitation. The culvert will alleviate a localized drainage problem causing
pooling on the existing sidewalk. The proposed bridge works involve deck rehabilitation,
abutment modifications and new approach slabs at the roadway level, in addition to concrete
repair to the surfaces of the abutment walls, minor repairs to the existing gabion blankets
above water level, and local sidewalk repairs.
Control of Flooding:
The culvert will be installed under the existing sidewalk and through the existing gabion
blankets, with the outlet at water level. The proposed works will therefore, not impact on the
storage or conveyance of flood water.
Pollution:
No work will be carried out in the water and containment shrouds, temporary pedestrian
hoarding, and sediment fencing will be installed between the under bridge sidewalks and the
watercourse to prevent any construction - generated debris from entering Etobicoke Creek.
Conservation of Land:
No work will occur in the watercourse and all disturbed areas will be restored and stabilized
before removal of the temporary sediment and erosion control measures. No significant
resource features exist on site.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33908
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 8, 2003
Application #: 010 /03/TOR
8.1.3 LINDA PEARSON /DAVID BURNS
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 1, Plan 4075, (4 Sunset Avenue), in
the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Etobicoke Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by Linda Pearson /David Burns.
835
The purpose is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the demolition of the an existing garden
shed and the existing two car garage attached to the south side of the house and the
construction of a detached one car garage on the south side of the house and the construction
of a one storey addition and attached deck onto the rear (southwest side) of the house.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan submitted by the applicant, date received January 13, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is located on the east side of Etobicoke Creek with the rear lot line
following the top of bank of the valley slope. The proposal is to excavate and place fill to
facilitate the demolition of the garden shed located in the rear yard having a 1.5 metre setback
from the top of bank and the demolition of the two car garage attached to the south side of the
house and 10 metres from the top of bank. The new works include the construction of a
detached one car garage on the south side of the house, being smaller than the existing
garage and situated closer to the street, with a 20 metre setback from the top of bank, and the
construction of a one storey addition and attached deck onto the rear (southwest side) of the
house, having a 12 metre setback from the top of bank.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the
proposed works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed along the rear fence line between the proposed works and the top
of bank in order to impede the overland migration of construction - generated sediment into
Etobicoke Creek, located approximately 30 metres away.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will be located entirely on tableland and will maintain a greater setback
from the top of bank than the existing structures to be removed, having a minimum 12 metre
setback from the valley slope. The proposed works are consistent with existing development
in the corridor reach and there are no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the
project. There are no significant resource features on the subject property.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2 - Existing Development - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
836
CFN: 33923
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 14, 2003
Application #: 016/03/TOR
8.1.4 LUN HANG FU
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 2, Plan 4074, (55 Leggett Avenue), in
the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Lun Hang Fu.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to
facilitate the demolition of the existing house and inground pool and the construction of a new
single family residence on the tableland portion of the lot.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan prepared by Mi -Ko Urban Consulting Inc., date received January 2, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to
facilitate the demolition of the existing house and inground pool and the construction of a new
single family residence on the tableland portion of the lot. The new house will be situated a
minimum 13 metres from an existing retaining wall which follows the top of bank, with the new
building footprint maintaining a greater setback from the top of bank than the existing footprint.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. Therefore, the
proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be installed between the proposed works and the top of bank in order to
prevent construction - generated sediment from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The new house will replace an existing house and inground pool and is consistent with existing
development in the corridor reach. There are no significant resource features on the site and
no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2(D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
837
CFN: 33899
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 8, 2003
CITY OF TORONTO (MIDTOWN COMMUNITY)
Application #: 007 /03/TOR
8.1.5 CHATEAU FINE HOMES
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 7, Plan
2773, (14 St. Margaret's Drive), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community
Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Chateau Fine Homes.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of the existing house and the construction of a new single family residence partially within the
Regional Storm Floodplain and within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Red -line Revised Basement Plan, First Floor Plan, Upper Floor Plan, Roof
Plan, Front Elevation, Rear Elevation, East Side Elevation, West Side Elevation,
North -South Section, East -West Section, Drawing Nos. A -01 to A -11, prepared by
Peter Higgins Architect Inc., dated November 22, 2002, date received December 24,
2002.
• Letter of Undertaking by Peter Higgins Architect Inc., dated December 20, 2002
advising that all excess excavated material will be removed from the site and
disturbed areas will be stabilized following completion of construction by sodding
and landscaping.
• Letter from K.H. Davis Consulting Ltd., dated January 9, 2003 acknowledging that the
proposed residence will be structurally floodproofed, date received January 15, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of the existing house and the construction of a new single family residence partially within the
Regional Storm Floodplain and within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area. The new house
will be located approximately 23 metres from the Don River and maintain a similar building
footprint as the existing house. The existing inground pool situated between the house and the
river, will remain.
838
Control of Flooding:
The proposed house will replace the existing residence, having a similar building footprint and
setback from the watercourse. The new house will be located outside of the hydraulic
floodway and dry floodproofed to the 350 Year flood event.
Pollution:
The proposed house will be located approximately 23 metres from the Don River and a silt
fence will be installed between the proposed works and the watercourse to impede to overland
migration of construction - generated sediment into the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The new house will replace the existing residence and will maintain a similar building footprint.
The proposed works are consistent with existing development in Hoggs Hollow and there are
no significant resource features on the site. There are no fisheries or slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 - Development and Redevelopment within
Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33906
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 8, 2003
CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY)
Application #: 011/03/TOR
8.1.6 SHAMSHER SINGH
To place fill within a regulated area on (91 Riverside Drive), in the City of Toronto
(North York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on
the property owned by Shamsher Singh.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the
construction of a new house on a vacant lot on the valley floor.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, Foundation & First Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan and Front & Rear
Elevations, Right & Left Side Elevation/Typical Section, Sections, Legend
Specifications and General Notes, Dwg. Nos. Al, 2 of 6, 3 of 6, 4 of 6, 5 of 6, and 6 of
6, prepared by D. Balchand, CET, date received January 13, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
839
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the
construction of a new house on a vacant lot on the valley floor.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the
proposed works will not impact the conveyance or storage of flood waters.
Pollution:
No sedimentation is expected from the proposed works as they are located approximately 75
metres from the watercourse, with Riverside Street situated between the subject property and
the Humber River.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is located within a developed portion of the Humber River valley and
remains as a vacant lot between several homes on the south side of Riverside Drive. The
proposed house will be located approximately 10 metres from the toe of the Humber River
valley slope, and will maintain a similar setback from both the street and the toe of slope as the
adjacent homes. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor
reach and there are no slope stability /geotechnical issues with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 - Infilling - of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33929
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 15, 2003
CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY)
Application #: 021/03/TOR
8.1.7 CITY OF TORONTO
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area
on (north of Ellesmere Road), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community
Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by
City of Toronto.
The purpose is to place fill and undertake grading works within a Fill Regulated Area and
Regional Storm floodplain, to facilitate the construction of a multi -use trail from Morningside
Park on the east side of Highland Creek, northerly to Ellesmere Road, across the Ellesmere
bridge to the west side of the creek, then southerly to the Curran Hall Community Centre
parking lot on Orton Park Road.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
840
• Red -line Revised Site Plan, Drawing No. SP -1, and Typical Cross Sections, Drawing
No. SP -2, revision date January 22, 2003, date received 24, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place fill and undertake grading works within a Fill Regulated Area and to
construct pedestrian bridges across Highland Creek and its tributary Malvern Creek in order to
facilitate the construction of a multi -use trail system from Morningside Park on the east side of
Highland Creek, north to Woburn Park on the south side of Malvern Creek at Markham Road,
with a westerly branch of the trail allowing a connection to the Curran Hall Community Centre.
The proposed trail will be constructed in 4 phases, with the first phase (subject to this
application) to commence this year involving the construction of the trail from the Curran Hall
Community Centre parking lot on Orton Park Road, along the west side of Highland Creek and
under the Ellesmere Street bridge, and north to Military Trail. Phase 2, which involves the
construction of the trail on the east side of Highland Creek from Morningside Park up the valley
slope and onto the tableland along the south and west sides of the Scarborough Centenary
Hospital lands, north to Ellesmere Avenue, and westward across the bridge, is pending private
landowner authorization. Staff anticipate that Phase 2 will be approved through a revision to
this permit. Phases 3 and 4 will involve the construction of the trail and associated bridges,
from Ellesmere Avenue north to Woburn Park, and requires further TRCA staff review. A new
permit application and approval from the Executive Committee will be required for Phases 3
and 4.
Control of Flooding:
The pathway route and bridge locations are designed to minimize impacts to conveyance and
storage of floodwaters through maximizing the bridge span length, placement of abutments
outside the watercourse channel and constructing bridge approaches at grade.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented and maintained during the
construction project to prevent the overland migration of construction - generated sediment into
the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The trail alignment, as established in the field with TRCA staff, has been designed to minimize
the impacts to the Morningside Forest ESA and the valley slope. The project will ensure no net
Toss of forest cover by replacing any removed woody vegetation at a 3:1 replanting /removal
ratio. There are no fisheries issues related to the project and routing of future trail phases will
be supported by a geotechnical analysis to ensure that the works will not result in instability
and erosion of the valley slope.
Policy Guidelines:
The project is in compliance with Section 4.1.2 - New Resource -based Uses - of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
841
CFN: 32628
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: October 12, 2001
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 324/01/TOR
8.1.8 ROBERT POLESE
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 131, Plan 65M -3066, (200 Fletcher
Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Robert Polese.
The purpose is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of the
Don River to facilitate the construction of a swimming pool on an existing residential lot.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, prepared by the applicant, received by the TRCA January 17, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a swimming pool on an existing lot, which has recently been
developed through a plan of subdivision. The setback to the rear lot line of the proposed pool
is 1.5 metres. However, the lot is adjacent to a stormwater management facility located within
the Open Space corridor and further separated from the watercourse by a public trail system.
The works are to be located over 80 metres from the watercourse, therefore, setbacks from the
property line are not a concern.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works will not be located in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River,
therefore, the conveyance and storage of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
All excavated material will be removed from the site and all disturbed areas will be stabilized
upon completion of construction. There are no anticipated impacts of sedimentation within the
Open Space corridor.
Conservation of Land:
No works are to be conducted within the Open Space corridor and no vegetation is proposed
for removal, therefore, there are no expected impacts to the Open Space corridor.
842
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33967
Report Prepared by: Kellie McCormack, extension 5269
For information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: January 23, 2003
8.1.9 BRIAN AND MARY WHITELAW
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 5, Plan 3755, (26 Windrush Road), in
the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Brian and Mary Whitelaw.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to construct a single
family dwelling in an existing residential neighbourhood in the City of Vaughan.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site and Grading Plan, prepared by MGM Consulting Inc., dated November 2002,
received January 2, 2003.
• Letter of Undertaking dated January 28, 2003, from Frank Mazzotta, stating that
TRCA's concerns regarding site rehabilitation /restoration will be addressed prior to
construction.
Application #: 032 /03NAUG
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to construct a single
family dwelling on an existing residential lot, in an established neighbourhood in the City of
Vaughan. The proposed works will be setback more than 10 metres from the stable top of
bank. A geotechnical assessment of slope stability, prepared by Terraprobe Limited, was
reviewed by TRCA staff and found acceptable. The rear portion of the subject property is
adjacent to the East Humber River Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) and to an Area of
Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI). However, all works are outside and setback more than
15 metres from the ESA and ANSI. The proposed works on the subject property are consistent
with setbacks and development along this reach of the East Humber River.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain. Therefore, the
storage or conveyance of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
Silt fencing will be established on -site for the duration of construction, to prevent sedimentation
of the watercourse.
843
Conservation of Land:
A geotechnical assessment of slope stability, prepared by Terraprobe Limited, was reviewed
by TRCA staff and found acceptable. All exposed areas will be re- vegetated upon completion
of the construction to the satisfaction of TRCA's ecologist. The rear portion of the subject
property is adjacent to the East Humber River Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) and to an
Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI). However, all works are outside and setback
more than 15 metres from the ESA and ANSI. The proposed works on the subject property is
consistent with setbacks and development along this reach of the East Humber River.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.(G) - Infilling, of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33866
Report Prepared by: Kellie McCormack, extension 5269
For information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: December 24, 2002
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Application #: 460 /02/VAUG
8.1.10 WILLIAM PONG
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 147, Plan M -1971, (27 Normandale
Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the
property owned by William Pong.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area at 27 Normandale Road,
Lot 147 Plan M -1971, in the Town of Markham, to facilitate the construction of a one storey
addition at the rear of the house.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan, prepared by David Fujiwara Architect, dated January 7, 2003, received
January 14, 2003
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the
construction of a one storey addition at the rear of the house. The proposed addition is
consistent with adjacent properties along the corridor reach. The subject property backs onto
Toogood Pond Park and part of a trail system within the park.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located in a Regional Storm Flood Plain, therefore, there will be no
impact to the conveyance or storage of flood waters.
844
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be established on -site for the duration of construction, to prevent
sedimentation of the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical issues related to the project and no significant natural resource
features will be affected. Any disturbed areas will be restored to their original condition.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.(C) - Minor Additions, of the Authority's Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33955
Report Prepared by: Kellie McCormack, extension 5269
For information contact: Mary -Ann Burns, extension 5267
Date: January 20, 2003
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 027 /03 /MARK
8.1.11 GAREENE HOMES LIMITED
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 65, Concession 1
Part 2 Part 3 Plan 65R- 13732, (642 & 646 Sunset Beach Road), in the Town of
Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by
Darlene Dale Croucher.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse, place fill and alter existing grades in a regulated area to
facilitate the construction of two single family dwellings, on two existing lots of record..
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Lapoyan Residences City Plan, Drawing No. 1, Job No. 02072, Prepared by Mitchell
Pound and Braddock dated December 2002.
• Lapoyan Residence Mitigation Planting Plan, Drawing No. M -1, Project No. 22124,
Prepared by M &M Design Consultants dated January 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
845
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill / regrade within a regulated area to facilitate the construction of two
single family residential dwellings on two existing lots of record. The proposal also includes
the alteration of a small watercourse through a minor realignment, a driveway crossing, slight
deepening, and the placement of ledger rock for improved drainage and aesthetic conditions.
The watercourse does not provide direct fish habitat, rather functions to convey flows between
two off site wetlands. The subject property falls entirely within a Fill Regulated area associated
with Lake Wilcox (Humber River watershed) and is within the Town of Richmond Hill OPA 129
planning area, with frontage on Lake Wilcox.
Control of Flooding:
The small watercourse traversing the site has an extremely small drainage area (less than 10
ha) and is therefore not managed as a Regional Flood Plain. All of the works proposed are
located outside of the flood plain limits associated with Lake Wilcox. The proposal will not
impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Watercourse works will be completed prior to any other site disturbance with a temporary rock
check dam in place at the downstream end. Upon completion of the watercourse works,
sediment and erosion controls (silt fence) will be installed and remain in place until the works
are completed. In light of the aforementioned, staff do not anticipate sedimentation of any
downstream features.
Conservation of Land:
The two existing lots are currently well vegetated and have been identified as EPA 2 and a
"zone of influence" in OPA 129 (Town of Richmond Hill) as a result of the environmental linkage
function of the area. Staff has worked closely with the applicants, significantly revising their
initial proposal, to site the residences, associated amenity spaces and area disturbance, so as
to minimize impact on the features and functions of the site. All disturbed areas, outside of the
amenity spaces, will be rehabilitated with native, non - invasive vegetation. The applicants have
further agreed to register a Conservation Easement in favour of the TRCA on the natural
portions of the site to afford a greater level of protection. Staff has requested that the Town
impose a condition on a committee of adjustment applicant for the site requiring the
Conservation Easement.
Staff feels that siting, design and construction practices, in conjunction with the Conservation
Easement will afford the natural features and functions on site the greatest level of protection
while providing for the dwellings permitted under the current zoning. Staff has further
determined that the small watercourse on site provides a water conveyance function and does
not constitute in situ fish habitat. With sediment and erosion controls in place there will not be
a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction of fish habitat (HADD). All works associated
with this proposal are located no less that 20 metres from Lake Wilcox, and 10 metres from the
Flood Line.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 G) (Infilling) of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
846
CFN: 33756
Report Prepared by: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
For information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: November 22, 2002
Application #: 431/02/RH
8.1.12 JAMES RIDD
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 30, Plan M1960, (124 Greenbelt
Crescent), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the
property owned by James Ridd.
The purpose is to construct an above ground pool in his backyard.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Site Plan #1 submitted by James Ridd dated January 10th 2003.
• Site Plan #2 submitted by James Ridd dated January 10th 2003.
• Pool Design submitted by James Ridd dated January 10th 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to remove approximately 2ft of fill to facilitate the construction of a 13X24 ft
above ground pool within the Fill Regulated Area of the Don River. The works are located on a
lot in an approved plan of subdivision adjacent to a stream corridor of the Don River.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm flood plain. There will be no
impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment control fence will be installed between the works and the stream corridor on along
the owners property line.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on a lot that backs onto a stream corridor outside the
Regional Storm flood plain. There are no significant resource features on the site. There are no
geotechnical issues related to the proposal. All excess fill material will be removed from the
site as part of the work. Proposed setback from the stream corridor is consistent with the
corridor reach.
847
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with section 4.2.2 (E) Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures of the Authorities Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33914
Report Prepared by: David Lawrie, extension 5268
For information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: January 10, 2003
848
Application #: 014/03/RH
THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:
RES.#B193/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Ron Moeser
THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications
(8.1.13 - 8.1.28, with the exception of 8.1.20 - 986506 Ontario Ltd. O/A Grand Homes), that
had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items, for which all the required information
was received and finalized as listed below.
RES.#B194/02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS
8.1.20 - 986506 Ontario Ltd. O/A Grand Homes
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Dick O'Brien
Jim McMaster
CARRIED
THAT application 8.1.20 - 986506 Ontario Ltd. O/A Grand Homes, that had been
scheduled on the agenda as an errata item, be deferred to a Special Executive Committee
Meeting scheduled to be held on February 21, 2003.
CARRIED
CITY OF BRAMPTON
8.1.13 BRAM EAST PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT GROUP LTD.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 6, 7,
Concession 9, (McVean Drive North of Ebenezer Road), in the City of Brampton,
Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of
Brampton.
The purpose is to construct in a floodplain and regrade in a regulated in order to facilitate the
construction of a new watermain within the right -of -way of the McVean Drive crossing of the
Humber River in the City of Brampton.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2008.
• Bram -East Phase 1- McVean Drive STA. 0 +580 to STA 0 +900, Drawing 3 of 10,
prepared by Candevcon Limited, dated November 15, 2002, date received by
TRCA December 18, 2002.
• Bram -East Phase 1- Structure Supporting 1200mm Sanitary Sewer Crossing
Tributary of West Humber River at McVean Drive- Plan, Elevation, Sections and
Details, Sheet Number 9, prepared by Candevcon Limited, dated November 15,
2002, date received by TRCA December 18, 2002.
849
•
•
Bram -East Phase 1- General Plan and Notes, Drawing Number G1, prepared by
Candevcon Limited, dated November 15, 2002, date received by TRCA December
18, 2002.
Letter of Undertaking to Address Minor Ecology Concerns, prepared by Diarmuid
Horgan of Candevcon Limited, dated February 05, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of excavating and replacing fill and constructing within the floodplain in
order to facilitate the construction of a watermain adjacent to McVean Drive as it crosses the
West Humber river. The watermain will be constructed using a directional bore method, with
two boreholes located in the Regulated Area, and the watermain line running 1.5 metres below
the river bottom. The works are to take place in conjunction with a sewer installation, which is
being constructed in a concrete encased support structure along the side of an existing bridge.
All works are to take place entirely within the right -of -way of McVean Drive. The sewer and
watermain will service the Bram East Phase 1 residential development, which has been
reviewed and approved by TRCA staff.
Control of Flooding:
No excavated material will be stockpiled within the floodplain and all existing grades are to be
maintained. There will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of floodwaters associated
with these works.
Pollution:
Sediment fencing will be installed between the bore holes and the watercourse to prevent
sedimentation. The excavated material will be stockpiled a minimum of 30 metres from the
watercourse and encircled with silt fencing, then placed back into the bore holes once
construction is completed. All disturbed areas will be restored with a native seed mix, and the
sediment fencing will remain until vegetation is established.
Conservation of Land:
There will be no instream works. The watermain will be installed using a directional bore
method a minimum of 1.5 metres below the watercourse. All disturbed areas will be restored
with a native seed mix following construction. There are no fisheries concerns or geotechnical
concerns related to this project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing- of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33927
Report Prepared by: Erin Pratley, extension 5244
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: January 15, 2003
850
Application #: 023 /03 /BRAM
8.1.14 MATTAMY (CASTLEMORE) LIMITED
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area
on Part Lot 13, Concession 7 (north of Castlemore Road, west of Goreway
Drive), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the
property owned by Mattamy (Castlemore) Limited.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated area and
the Regional Storm Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond
outlet into the Humber River.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2008.
• General Plan, Drawing No. 2, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., dated
July 2002, revised November 28, 2002.
• Grading Plan, Drawing No. 9, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., dated
July 2002, revised November 28, 2002.
• Storm Sewer Outfall, Drawing No. 24, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering
Ltd., dated July 2002, revised November 18, 2002.
• Storm Tributary Area, Drawing No. 28, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering
Ltd., dated July 2002, sealed October 28, 2002.
• SWM Pond, Drawing No. 29, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., dated
July 2002, revised November 28, 2002.
• Pond Sections, Drawing No. 30, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd.,
dated July 2002, sealed October 28, 2002.
• Pond Details, Drawing No. 31, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd.,
dated July 2002, revised November 18, 2002.
• Siltation Control Plan, Drawing No. 35, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering
Ltd., dated July 2002, revised November 18, 2002.
• Valley Buffer and Tributary Outfall Planting Plan, Drawing No. L2, prepared by NAK
design group, dated August 2002, revised January 30, 2003, redline revised on
February 5, 2003, by BC to remove retaining wall.
• Valley Buffer and Tributary Outfall Planting Details and List, Drawing No. D1,
prepared by NAK design group, dated August 2002, revised January 30, 2003.
• Letter of Undertaking to address minor outstanding Ecology concerns, prepared
by David Schaeffer of David Schaeffer Engineering, dated January 28, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated area and
the Regional Storm Floodplain to facilitate the construction of a stormwater management pond
outlet into the Humber River. The works are in support of a Draft Plan of Subdivision and in
compliance with the Vales East Area Master Environmental Servicing Plan. The stormwater
management pond is designed to provide quality and quantity controls for stormwater flows on
the subject property. The outlet will extend from the pond down into the valley corridor
floodplain where flows will be dissipated prior to entering the watercourse.
851
Control of Flooding:
The works are not expected to affect the conveyance or storage of stormflows as there will not
be any significant alterations to the existing grades within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
Pollution:
All works will be surrounded by sediment and erosion control fencing to mitigate against the
overland migration of construction generated sediment and materials. All disturbed areas will
be restored following construction with appropriate native species. The works will be required
to comply with the Ministry of Natural Resource's Warm Water Timing Restrictions, prohibiting
work form occurring between March 31 and July 1.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with this application.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33455
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: August 26, 2002
CITY OF PICKERING
Application #: 331 /02 /BRAM
8.1.15 FIRST SIMCHA SHOPPING CENTRES LTD.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 18,
Concession 1, (1899 Brock Road), in the City of Pickering, Duffins Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by First Simcha Shopping Centres
Ltd.
The purpose is to demolish the existing Metro East Trade Centre and construct a new 12,000
square metre commercial building, being a Sam's Club Warehouse. The proposed
development is partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain and Special Policy Area for the
City of Pickering.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
•
•
•
Brock Road and Pickering Parkway Site Plan SK -1, prepared by The Abbarch
Partnership Architects, received January 7, 2003.
Landscape Plan L -1, L -2, prepared by Terraplan Landscape Architects Inc.,
received January 7, 2003.
Site Plan SA -01, prepared by Petroff Partnership Architects, received January 2,
2003.
Site Grading Plan SW -G, prepared by Counterpoint Engineering Inc., revised
January 27, 2003, received January 31, 2003.
852
Site Servicing Plan SW -S, prepared by Counterpoint Engineering Inc., received
January 2, 2003.
Stormwater Management Letter with Appendix A- Rooftop /Orifice Control
Specifications; Appendix B- Modified Rational Calculations; Appendix C- Orifice
Control Calculations, prepared by Counterpoint Engineering., received January 2,
2003.
• Topographic Plan of Part Lot 18, Concession 1, City of Pickering, prepared by J.D.
Barnes Limited, received January 24, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to demolish the existing Metro East Trade Centre and to construct a new
12,000 square metre commercial building to be used for a Sam's Club Warehouse Membership
Club. The new warehouse will be located within an area with similar commercial development
and is partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain and Special Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and the new structure
will be dry- floodproofed to the 350 -year flood level in accordance with Special Policy Area
criteria.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the proposed works and the watercourse prior to
construction and maintained during the construction project in order to prevent any sediment
from entering the watercourse which is located approximately 500 metres away.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will replace an existing commercial development and will be located
entirely on tableland. The proposed structure is consistent with existing development in the
corridor reach. No significant resource features will be affected by construction and there are
no slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with this development.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2.(A) - New Multi -Lot and /or Large Lot
Development - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33909
Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307
For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 9, 2003
853
Application #: 012 /03 /PICK
8.1.16 SHERIDAN CHEVROLET OLDSMOBILE CADILLAC LTD.
To regrade within a Fill Regulated Are a on Part Lot 18, Concession 1 Part 1
Plan 40R- 11779, (Southeast Corner of Brock Road and Finch Avenue), in the
City of Pickering, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by
Sheridan Chevrolet Oldsmobile Cadillac Ltd.
The purpose is to regrade within a Fill Regulated Area of the Duffins Creek and to construct a
parking lot that will be adjacent to an existing vehicle dealership. The site is within the Duffins
Creek Special Policy Area (SPA).
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
•
•
•
Drawing No. D1 of 3 Existing Conditions Tree Inventory, prepared by Henry
Kortekaas & Associates, received November 7, 2002.
Drawing No. D2 of 3 Site Plan, prepared by Henry Kortekaas & Associates,
received November 7, 2003.
Drawing No. D3 of 3 Landscape Plan, prepared by Henry Kortekaas & Associates,
received November 7, 2002.
Drawing L1 of 1, Sections, prepared by Henry Kortekaas & Associates, received
November 7, 2002.
Drawing No. SE1 Site Engineering, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates
Ltd., received November 7, 2002.
Stormwater Management Analysis, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates
Ltd., received November 7, 2002.
Functional Servicing Report, prepared by Schaeffers Consulting Engineers,
received June 19, 1998.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposed works involve regrading within a Fill Regulated Area of the Duffins Creek to
facilitate the construction of an at grade parking area located adjacent to an existing
automobile dealership, entirely within the Regional Storm Flood Plain and within the Duffins
Creek Special Policy Area (SPA). The works are situated on an existing manicured area,
approximately 110 metres from the watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are located within the Regional Storm Floodplain but outside the
hydraulic floodway. Since the parking lot expansion will be constructed at grade, there will be
no impacts to the conveyance or storage of flood water.
Pollution:
Sediment is not expected to enter the watercourse as the proposed works are located
approximately 110 metres from Duffins Creek.
854
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works will be situated on the valley floor and are consistent with existing
commercial development in the corridor reach. No significant resource features will be
impacted by construction of the proposed development and there are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Steam Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33931
Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 14, 2003
CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY)
Application #: 019/03 /PICK
8.1.17 DRAGAN BAKOC
To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 30, Plan 2234, (50 Bonnyview Drive), in
the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Mimico Creek
Watershed as located on the property owned by Dragan Bakoc.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of the existing house and the construction of a new house entirely within the Regional Storm
Floodplain of Mimico Creek and within the Draft Bonnyview Drive - South Etobicoke Special
Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
• Site Plan, Basement Floor Plan, Ground Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan, Rear
Elevation, Side Elevation, Side Elevation, Drawing Nos. Al to A7, prepared by
Culmone & Associates, dated January 29, 2003, date received January 31, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of the existing house and the construction of a new house entirely within the Regional Storm
Floodplain of Mimico Creek and within the Draft Bonnyview Drive - South Etobicoke Special
Policy Area. The new house will be located approximately 15 metres closer to the watercourse
than the house that its replacing, however, it will still be maintaining a similar setback from the
creek as the adjacent homes, being approximately 50 metres.
855
Control of Flooding:
The proposed house will be located outside the hydraulic floodway of Mimico Creek and
dry- floodproofed to the 350 Year flood level as per the proposed SPA policy requirements.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the proposed works and the watercourse to prevent the
overland migration of construction - generated sediment from entering Mimico Creek.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is located on the valley floor, entirely within the Regional Storm Floodplain
and within a developed residential community recognized in the Draft Bonnieview Drive -
South Etobicoke SPA. The proposed new house will replace the existing residence and is
consistent with existing development in the area. There are no significant resource features on
site and no fisheries or slope stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1- Development and Redevelopment within
Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Area - of the Authority's Valley and Stream
Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33821
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: December 18, 2002
CITY OF TORONTO (MIDTOWN COMMUNITY)
Application #: 457/02/TOR
8.1.18 CANADIAN MEMORIAL CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 24,
Concession 2 EYS, (6100 Leslie Street), in the City of Toronto (Midtown
Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to
facilitate the construction of an addition onto the former Associated Hebrew School and the
construction of additional parking areas within the Regional Storm Floodplain to permit the use
of the site as the new Canadian Chiropractic College.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.\
•
•
Landscape Plan, Planting Plan, Grading Plan, and Detail Sheet, Dwg. Nos. L -1, L -2,
L -3, & L -4, prepared by Ferris & Associates Inc., dated February 4, 2003, date
received February 5, 2003.
Letter of Undertaking, dated February 5, 2003, acknowledging that applicant will
satisfy any and all outstanding TRCA concerns.
856
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The subject property is located on the east side of Wilket Creek, entirely within a Fill Regulated
Area and partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River. The proposed works
involve the construction of an addition onto the east (street) side of the former Associated
Hebrew School situated on the valley slope, the construction of a one level parking structure
above the existing parking lot on the north side of the building, and the construction of at grade
parking areas to the west and south of the building in order to facilitate the conversion of the
Hebrew School to a Chiropractic College for adult students.
Control of Flooding:
A portion of the existing north parking lot is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain,
however the upper parking structure will be above the flood level. The new parking situated on
the west and south sides of the school will be partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain but
entirely outside of the hydraulic floodway. As the majority of the proposed parking expansion
is located on an asphalt and /or gravel area presently used as a playground area and informal
parking area, minimal grading will be required in order to meet the Provincial Policy parking
criteria for safety. Authority staff are satisfied that the proposed works will not adversely impact
the storage or conveyance of floodwater.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented on site prior to any construction
activities and maintained during the project in order to prevent sediment from entering the
watercourse which is located a minimum 14 metres distance from the westerly parking area.
Conservation of Land:
The entire property is located in the valley corridor, both on the slope and valley floor. Past
development of the site, including filling and grading works approved by issuance of a permit
by the TRCA in 1989 to the Associated Hebrew School, has resulted in some slope
manipulation and regrading works in the valley. The proposed new development seeks to
enlarge the existing school and parking facilities which will involve some minor fill placement
and grading in the floodplain on areas previously disturbed. No riparian vegetation will be
disturbed and the site will be stabilized and restored, with a vegetative buffer planted between
the watercourse and the developed portion of the site. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with the project.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works comply with Section 4.2.2 - Development and
Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas -
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33924
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 14, 2003
857
Application #: 018/03/TOR
8.1.19 FREDDY DEGASPERIS JR.
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (35 Green
Valley Road), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Freddy DeGasperis Jr..
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of the existing residence in order to construct a new larger house and swimming pool entirely
within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and within the Hoggs Hollow Special
Policy Area.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
•
•
Site Plan, Basement Floor Plan, Ground Floor Plan, and Elevations, Dwg. Nos. Al,
A2, A3 & A7, prepared by Thomas Marzotto Architect, revision date January 30,
2003, received February 4, 2003.
Second Floor Plan, Proposed Residence, Elevations, Sections, and Sections, Dwg.
Nos. A4, A5, A6, A8, & A9, prepared by Thomas Marzotto Architect, dated
November 2002, date received January 6, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the demolition
of the existing residence in order to construct a new house and swimming pool within the
Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River and within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area.
Control of Flooding:
The new residence is located outside of the hydraulic floodway and will be dry floodproofed to
the Regional Storm Flood level, while the pool will be structurally floodproofed to the Regional
Storm flood level.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the proposed works and the watercourse in order to
prevent the overland migration of construction - generated sediment into the Don River, which is
located approximately 25 metres away.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is situated on the valley floor, and is traversed at the rear by the gabion
Tined Don River. The entire property is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don
River and within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area. The existing house will be demolished
and a new larger home and pool will be constructed. The proposed development is consistent
with existing development in the corridor reach and there are no significant resource features
on site. There are no slope stability /geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with this
project.
858
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1(B) - Development Guidelines for
Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of
the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33901
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 8, 2003
CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY)
Application #: 006 /03/TOR
8.1.20 986506 ONTARIO LTD. O/A GRAND HOMES
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Block J, Plan 1538, (25 Kingsbury
Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area),
Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by 986506 Ontario Ltd.
o/a Grand Homes.
• Deferrred
8.1.21 DOUG SALMON
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 58, Plan 4351 (105 Sylvan Avenue), in
the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront
Watershed as located on the property owned by Sylvia and Robert Singer.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Lake
Ontario shoreline to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool in the rear yard.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
• Red -line Revised Site Plan for Proposed inground Swimming Pool at 105 Sylvan
Avenue, Scarborough, submitted by applicant, date received January 8, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Lake
Ontario shoreline to facilitate the construction of an inground swimming pool in the rear yard.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within the Regulatory Floodplain or the wave uprush area
of Lake Ontario. Therefore, there will be no impact on the control of flooding.
859
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed between the proposed works and the top of the Scarborough Bluffs
to prevent any sedimentation into Lake Ontario.
Conservation of Land:
The subject property is located adjacent to an area of the Scarborough Bluffs where the TRCA
and the municipality have constructed shoreline protection works. A geotechnical report has
been submitted by the applicant that indicates that the proposed pool will be sufficiently
setback from the top of the bank of the Scarborough Bluffs, having a 10 metre setback from
the long -term stable bluff crest. All excavated material will be removed from the site. The
proposed works are consistent with existing development along this area of the Bluffs and no
significant resources features are on site.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and
Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program and
in compliance with the Provincial Policy Statement for Natural Hazards on the Great Lakes
Shoreline.
CFN: 33928
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: January 15, 2003
CITY OF VAUGHAN
Application #: 022/03/TOR
8.1.22 FAIRBROOK DEVELOPMENTS INC. (C.O.B. NORTH STAR HOMES)
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 16, 17,
Concession 4, (2440 and 2448 Rutherford Road), in the City of Vaughan, Don
River Watershed as located on the property owned by Fairbrook Developments
Inc. (C.O.B. North Star Homes).
The purpose is to place fill / regrade within a regulated area to facilitate site grading in support
of Draft Plan of Subdivision 19T- 02V05.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2008.
• Fairbrook Developments Inc. Lot Grading Plans, Drawing Nos. LG -1 & LG -2
prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc. dated January 28, 2003.
• Fairbrook Developments Inc. Sediment Control Plan, Drawing No. SCP -1 prepared
by Valdor Engineering Inc. dated December 2, 2002.
• Fairbrook Developments Inc. Miscellaneous Details Plan, Drawing No. MD -1
prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc. dated January 28, 2003.
• Fairbrook Developments Inc. Key Plan Drawing L1 prepared by Strybos
Associates Ltd., dated Received by TRCA January 5, 2003.
• Fairbrook Developments Inc. Valley Restoration Landscape Plans, Drawings L2 &
L3 prepared by Strybos Associates Ltd., Received by TRCA January 5, 2003.
860
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal includes the placement of fill within a Regulated Area to facilitate site grading in
support of an approved Draft Plan of Subdivision (19T- 02V05). The valley limits were
established by staff through the review and approval of the draft plan. Some minor grading is
required within the open space block to meet municipal lot grading standards adjacent to the
open space block. All disturbed areas will be rehabilitated using native non - invasive species.
Control of Flooding:
There are no works proposed within the regional storm flood plain. There will be no impact on
the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be in place to ensure that no sediment enters the
watercourse located within the adjacent open space block.
Conservation of Land:
The grading proposed within the open space block is minimal and maintains the existing draw
features. All disturbed areas will be rehabilitated using native non - invasive plant species. With
the proposed sediment and erosion controls in place any potential impacts to fish habitat can
be mitigated.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.1.1 - New Development of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33878
Report Prepared by: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
For information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: December 30, 2002
Application #: 461 /02NAUG
8.1.23 VILLA CHARITIES INC. /DIPOCE CAMPUS
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 23, Concession 8, (Highway 27),
in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Villa Charities Inc./Villa Colombo (Vaughan).
The purpose is to place fill in a Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a Long Term
Care Facility on the floor of the Humber River Valley.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
• Villa Charities Site Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Drawing 1, Prepared by Valdor
Engineering Inc., dated February 4, 2003.
861
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal is to place fill within a regulated area to facilitate the construction of a Long Term
Care Facility on the floor of the Humber River Valley. While the proposed structure is located
entirely outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain, minor fill placement will be required on the
fringe of the flood plain as a result of the need to establish stable 3:1 slopes from the building
site to existing grade. The aforementioned fill in the flood plain is a result of staffs request that
the building site be raised (through the placement of fill) to maximize the vertical freeboard
from the Regional Storm Flood Elevation. A prior application for fill in a Regulated Area and
Regional Storm Flood Plain was refused by a Hearing Board of the Executive Committee on
January 17, 2003 as it affected the control of flooding (Res. #B170/02). The applicant has
since revised the plans to relocate and slightly redesign the building eliminating the need for
encroachment into the flood plain with the building. The redesign will likely result in a
reduction of beds available for long term care.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed facility will be located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain. Fill placement
on the flood fringe will be minimal and should not impact on the storage or conveyance of
flood waters.
Pollution:
A sediment fence will be erected between the work site and the Humber River to prevent any
construction generated sediments from entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed works are located on the floor of the Humber River Valley. In accordance with
the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, no new development is permitted within
the valley corridors. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) staff have been working closely with the City on the Regional Road 27 Valley
Corridor Study. As input to this study, which is considering possible new development within
the valley due to the unique aspects of the area, the Authority, through Resolution #A141/01 as
outlined below, has indicated that they would not object to some low scale, low intensity
development in a few specific, non - hazardous areas.
THAT the City of Vaughan be advised that the Authority would not object to some low
scale, low intensity development in specific, non - hazardous areas, as set out in the staff
report.
As set out in the staff report accompanying that resolution, in the event development is further
contemplated in these areas through the Regional Road 27 Valley Corridor Study, the TRCA
would be seeking further protection and enhancement of the hazardous areas as part of any
development applications. The site subject to the proposed application is one of the sites
referred to in the above noted resolution.
862
Staff note that the proposed use is of a larger scale, more intense use than contemplated by
staff through the Regional Road 27 Valley Corridor Study, however, staff further note that the
proposed use is a permitted use under the current zoning for the non flood susceptible
portions of the site. The building site is currently void of any woody vegetation and staff will be
pursuing opportunities to renaturalize portions of the site through review and approval of an
associated site plan application. Additionally, it is staffs understanding that the applicants are
supportive of implementing the City's and the TRCA's trail objectives through the site.
The size and design of the structure directly relates to its ultimate function as a long term care
facility, a criteria established by the Ministry of Health with respect to operational standards. In
light of the aforementioned, the applicants are fairly constrained on this site and will likely have
to slightly reduce the number of patrons they can service in the future by a reduced number of
residential units. In order to maximize the service level of the facility, and meet the stringent
criteria of the Ministry of Health, the proposal does not include a setback from the Flood Plain
as encouraged by the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Staff have advised
City staff that we are prepared to support the proposed request for no setback in the interest of
eliminating the need for fill within the Regional Storm Floodplain.
Policy Guidelines:
While the proposal is not consistent with Section 4.1 - New Development of the Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program, Resolution # A141/01 of the TRCA supports some
new development on this site, as does the current zoning. Opportunities to provide for public
access and renaturalization of portions of the site will be further pursued by staff.
CFN: 33981
Report Prepared by: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
For information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: January 29, 2003
Application #: 039 /03/VAUG
8.1.24 VINCENT & LEILA TRAVAGLINI
To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 116, Plan 65M -3066, (288 Fletcher
Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property
owned by Vincent & Leila Travaglini.
The purpose is to place fill and conduct associated site grading within a Regulated Area of the
Don River to facilitate the construction of a swimming pool and cabana on an existing
residential lot.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
•
•
Landscape Plan #VG2002 -14 dated June 28, 2002, dated received January 14,
2003.
Letter of Undertaking by Leila Travaglini, emailed by Vince Travaglini, dated and
received February 5, 2003.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
863
Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a swimming pool and cabana on an existing lot, which has
recently been developed through a plan of subdivision. The setback to the rear lot line of the
proposed pool is 2.3 metres and the cabana is 0.6 metres. However, the lot is adjacent to a
stormwater management facility located within the Open Space corridor, and further separated
from the watercourse by a public trail system. The works are to be located over 80 metres
from the watercourse, therefore, setbacks from the property line are not a concern.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works will not be located in the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River,
therefore, the conveyance and storage of floodwaters will not be affected.
Pollution:
All excavated material will be removed from the site and all disturbed areas will be stabilized
upon completion of construction. There are no anticipated impacts of sedimentation within the
Open Space corridor.
Conservation of Land:
No works are to be conducted within the Open Space corridor and no vegetation is proposed
for removal, therefore, there are no impacts to the Open Space corridor.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2.(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary
Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33933
Report Prepared by: Kellie McCormack, extension 5269
For information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: January 15, 2003
TOWN OF AJAX
Application #: 024 /03/VAUG
8.1.25 REGION OF DURHAM
To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area
on Lot 6, Part Lot 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 18, 21,27, Concession 1, (south of Highway 401
at eastern bend of Achilles Road, in the area west and east of Pickering Beach
Road), in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the
property owned by Region of Durham.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for Salem Road works, for watermain and sewer
installation along Salem) in a Fill Regulated Area; construct structures (Achilles and Salem
Road culverts) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse ( tributary of
Carruthers Creek) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through a dam
and pump around method /diversion method while installing the 2 culverts and removing
existing Pickering Beach Road culvert.
864
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
• Sheet 8 -Salem Road South from 240m N of Bayly St to 490m N of Bayly St; Sheet
9 -Salem Road South from 490m N of Bayly St to 50m S of Achilles Road; Sheet
18 -Salem Road South - General Arrangement- Carruthers Creek Tributary Culvert;
Sheet 19 -Salem Road South - Carruthers Creek Tributary Culvert-all dated January
20, 2003; all received January 22, 2003; all prepared by Chisholm, Fleming and
Associates.
• Sheet 1 of 47- Cover- Construction of Salem Road and Achilles Road; Sheet 7 of
47- Removals; all dated December 3, 2003; all received December 9, 2002; all
prepared by Chisholm, Fleming and Associates.
• Sheet 20 -Salem Road South Bayly Street to Achilles- Street Tree and Valley
Rehabilitation Planting Plan; Sheet 21 -Salem Road South - Street Tree and Valley
Rehabilitation Planting Plan; Sheet 22 -Salem Road South- Culvert Crossing and
Creek Rehabilitation Plan; Sheet 23 -Salem Road South - Detail Sheet; all dated
January 17, 2003; all received January 22, 2003; all prepared by Cosburn
Giberson, Landscape Architect.
• Drawing C- G- 1- Achilles road Realignment from 355m W of Salem Road S to 250m
W of Salem Rd S; Drawing C- G- 3- Achilles Road Realignment Stream
Improvements; Drawing G-4- Achilles Road Realignment Existing Stream
Improvements; all dated January 2003; all received January 15, 2003; all prepared
by Totten Sims Hubicki.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to the drawings ); dated January
32, 2003; received January 31, 2003; prepared by Region of Durham.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to the drawings, HEC -2 analysis);
dated January 29, 2003; received January 30, 2003; prepared by Town of Ajax.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal involves the construction of the proposed Salem Road South (formerly known as
Carruthers Creek Drive) from Bayly Street northward, which will tie into the proposed Achilles
Road extension, and the re- construction of Achilles Road to smooth the alignment at the 90
degree bend west of Pickering Beach Road. This is a joint venture by the Region of Durham
(Salem) and the Town of Ajax (Achilles). A watermain and sanitary sewer will be installed along
the proposed Salem Road. TRCA staff commented on the alignments of Salem Road South
and Achilles Road during the Environmental Assessment processes. The project includes the
installation of a new 4.0m (W) x 2.0m (H) x 73m (L) prefabricated open footed metal plate
culvert for the proposed Salem Road. The tributary will need to be realigned through the
culvert and at each end of the culvert in order to tie into the existing tributary. The existing
1370 mm diameter corrugated steel pipe (CSP) culvert on Achilles Road is perched at the
south end and is in poor condition. The proposed culvert crossing for Achilles Road is a larger
2100mm diameter CSP with a bottom buried 300mm below the stream bed. The culvert will be
installed to match the existing creek profile in order to rectify the perched condition. Since
Pickering Beach Road will be closed, the existing downstream culvert (1370 mm diameter) on
the road will be permanently removed and a new natural bottom channel will be created. Only
865
the western section of the project, comprising of a portion of Salem Road South is located
within the Fill Regulated Area. The Carruther's Creek tributary has a Regional Storm Floodplain
associated with it. Floodplain mapping has been completed as far west as Pickering Beach
Road.
Control of Flooding:
Since the Region of Durham is phasing the Salem project, a permit application was brought
forward at a previous Executive Committee for the grubbing, clearing and balanced cut and fill
for the Salem Road works. The former channel for the Salem Road crossing will be filled and
the old channel for the Pickering Beach Road crossing will be opened. Staff has reviewed the
hydraulic analysis for the proposed Salem Road culvert and find it adequate. The hydraulic
analysis for the Achilles Road crossing is outstanding, however, committed to by the applicant
through a Letter of Undertaking. Staff do not anticipate any concerns based on the proposed
sizing of the new culvert versus the existing culvert.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, coffer dam, filter bags, rock vortex weirs) will be
implemented to ensure that the construction - generated sediments do not enter the
watercourse. The proposed cross section for Salem Road will be urban on the west and rural
on the east. The storm sewers on the west will be connected to storm sewers and on the east
will outfall to grassed swales.
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction.
There will be in stream works associated with this project. All in stream works will be
conducted in the dry with either a dam and pump around method or a diversion method. With
erosion and sedimentation plans in effect (dam and pump around) for the Achilles Road culvert
replacement, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish
habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff for the works. The
in stream works associated with the Salem Road culvert installation will constitute a HADD of
fish habitat and will require an authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
(DFO). The existing watercourse will be permanently realigned and the old channel will be
filled. The Region has submitted a Letter of Intent which indicates the following net benefits in
the compensation measures: creating pools and riffles in the new channel and widening the
banks for fish habitat; planting riparian species for overhead coverage; creating a low flow
channel and re- instating substrates; removing the Pickering Beach Road culvert and
re- constructing the natural channel; and replacing the existing perched Achilles culvert with a
larger culvert that matches existing inverts. When the DFO authorization has been received,
TRCA staff will be in a position to issue a "Fill, Construction, Alteration to Waterways" permit.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3- Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33726
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: January 28, 2003
866
Application #: 424 /02 /AJAX
TOWN OF CALEDON
8.1.26 TOWN OF CALEDON
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a Fill Regulated Area at Edelweiss
Park (Glasgow Road and Deer Valley Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber
River Watershed as located on the property owned by The Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority.
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated area and the Regional Storm
Floodplain to facilitate the expansion of an existing parking area.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
• Edelweiss Soccer Park Parking Lot Plan, Drawing B, prepared by the Town of
Caledon, dated December 5, 2002, redline revised by BC for sediment controls on
February 5, 2003.
• TRCA Erosion and Sediment Control guidelines, Silt Fence, Figure 1.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated area and the Regional Storm
Floodplain to facilitate the expansion of an existing parking area. The subject property is
owned by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and is located south of Glasgow
Road and west of Deer Valley Drive in Bolton. The subject lands currently service the majority
of the municipality's recreational needs with existing facilities and clubhouse structures for
soccer and tennis. The subject lands are located within the Regional Floodplain of the
Humber River which has restricted the ability for the Town to expand the existing facilities to
accommodate the growing needs of the Bolton community.
Although, Town staff are working with Authority staff to identify alternate locations to support
Bolton's long -term recreational needs, there is an urgent need for minimal expansion of the
existing facilities. The Authority recently approved a 100 square foot expansion of the existing
tennis clubhouse and the formalization of an adjacent grassed parking area with a gravel base.
This application involves the expansion of the main soccer field parking area into an adjacent
grassed area that currently serves as overflow parking. The new parking area would remain
with a gravel base.
867
This proposal is not entirely in compliance with the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor
Management Program which, among other criteria, requires parking lots within the Regional
Floodplain to be located outside of the Hydraulic Floodway and be floodproofed to the
100 -year storm elevation. Approximately half of the existing parking area and all of the
expansion area is within the Hydraulic Floodway. Furthermore, elevating the parking area
above the 100 -year storm elevation would be unfeasible from a traffic flow perspective and
undesirable due to potential impacts to flood storage. Notwithstanding these policy concerns,
staff are prepared to support this proposal given the problems that the Town is facing with
respect to a lack of parking for the park during times of peek usage. During these peek
periods park visitors are forced to park on the grass adjacent to the parking lot and along the
shoulder area of the main roads. This is not only a safety concern but also likely impacts the
adjacent Humber River as a result of the sediment which is inadvertently carried from the
disturbed grass areas to the neighboring streets. Overall, the support of Authority staff for this
proposal is based on the understanding that the Town of Caledon will continue to explore
alternative locations outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain which will alleviate expansion
pressure at Edelweiss Park.
Control of Flooding:
Impacts to the conveyance and storage of stormflows should be minimal considering that the
existing grades will be maintained and the parking lot is likely to be void of cars during any
significant storm event.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion control fencing will be installed and maintained around the proposed
works to prevent the overland migration of construction generated sediment from entering the
watercourse. All disturbed area shall be restored following construction with appropriate
vegetation.
Conservation of Land:
There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this proposal.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies in part with Section 4.2.2 (H) - Development &
Redevelopment/intensification Within Non - Established Communities /Highly Urbanized Areas,
of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33867
Report Prepared by: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
For information contact: Brian Casagrande, extension 5311
Date: December 24, 2002
868
Application #: 459/02/CAL
TOWN OF MARKHAM
8.1.27 TOWN OF MARKHAM
To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 10,
Concession 4 Lot 10, Plan 65M -2668, (Hydro One parking lot, south of Clegg
Road Extension, east of Rodick Road), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River
Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Markham.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for parking lot extension, tie into Rodick Road) in a
Fill Regulated Area, construct a structure (asphalt Road) within a Regional Storm Floodplain
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
• Cover Sheet -Clegg Road Extension; A- 1- Alignment Details; DR -1 -Hydro One -
Storm Drainage Plan; R- 1- Removals; S -1- Staging; TR -2 -Tree Transplanting Details;
all dated July 24, 2002, received July 25, 2002, prepared by Cole Sherman.
• GR -1 -Hydro One -Site Grading Plan; NC -1 -New Construction -Clegg Road from Sta.
0 +000 to 0 +050 and Rodick Road from Sta. 0 +103.863 to 0 +227.594;
TR- 1- Planting Plan and Siltation Control; all dated November 6 ,2002; all received
November 14, 2002; all prepared by URS Cole Sherman.
• Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering drawings and
restoration plans); dated January 29, 2003; received February 3, 2003; prepared by
the Town of Markham.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal consists of the extension of the existing Hydro One parking lot at the southern
extremity. The Clegg Road Extension, which will be located outside the Fill Regulated Area,
will cut through the existing northern parking lot for Hydro One and will tie into Rodick Road.
The proposed parking lot extension to the south will be in compensation for the Toss of the
northern parking lot. A very small portion of the rear of the proposed parking extension will be
located within a fill regulated area. The proposed parking lot will be located 10 metres north of
the Regional Storm Floodplain. The location of the tie into Rodick Road will be located within a
small portion of the Regional Storm Floodplain and a Fill Regulated Area. The Clegg Road
Extension was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process.
Control of Floodina:
The Clegg Road Extension and the Hydro One parking lot extension will not be located within
the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore, there will not be any impacts to flooding. The
grades within the Regional Storm Floodplain will be maintained in the area associated with the
Clegg Road tie into Rodick Road.
Pollution:
Standard erosion control measures (silt fence) will be implemented to ensure that the
construction - generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. The proposed Clegg Road
Extension and the proposed parking lot extension will tie into an existing storm sewer.
869
Conservation of Land:
All disturbed areas will be restored with native /non- invasive species following construction. As
there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to
fish habitat loss.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33738
Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304
For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304
Date: January 27, 2003
TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL
Application #: 427 /02 /MARK
8.1.28 HEATHWOOD HOMES TRANQUILITY LIMITED
To alter a waterway, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 67, 68, Concession
1, (west of Yonge Street, north of King Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill,
Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Heathwood
Homes Tranquility Limited.
The purpose is to alter a watercourse and place fill within a regulated area to facilitate the
construction of a temporary watercourse crossing to allow for pre - servicing of lands subject to
an approved draft plan of subdivision.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
• Tranquility Subdivision, Siltation Control Plan - Details, prepared by David
Schaeffer Engineering Ltd., Drawing No. 26, 4th submission dated 03- 01 -29.
• Tranquility Subdivision, Siltation Control Plan, prepared by David Schaeffer
Engineering Ltd., Drawing No. 25 -INT, 4th submission dated 03- 01 -29.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The proposal includes the placement of a 15m long 975mm culvert and associated back fill to
allow for access to both sides of the watercourse in order to allow for pregrading of lands
subject to an approved draft plan of subdivision. The approval of the draft plan included
relocating and enhancing the watercourse. These broader works are still under review by
TRCA and DFO staff and will be the subject of a future permit application.
870
Control of Flooding:
The proposed watercourse crossing involves the placement of a culvert sufficiently sized to
convey the 2 year storm event, and low profile fill placement. Staff feel that these temporary
works will not negatively impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
Sediment and erosion controls are proposed around the watercourse and the crossing
location. Staff do not anticipate any sediment entering the watercourse.
Conservation of Land:
This entire reach of the Humber River tributary will be subject to a comprehensive relocation
and enhancement plan later this spring. As such, staff are not seeking any site restoration
works specific to the temporary crossing, rather, the final design will be subject to restoration.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 (Infrastructure and Servicing) of the Authority's
Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33980
Report Prepared by: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
For Information contact: Sandra Malcic, extension 5217
Date: January 28, 2003
TOWN OF AJAX
Application #: 038/03/RH
8.1.29 RUNNYMEDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED
To alter a waterway on Lot 3, 4, Plan 18T- 94020, (Shoal Point Road), in the Town of
Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by
Runnymede Development Corporation Limited.
The purpose is to construct a stormwater management pond on the east side of the Audley
Road South extension, and a storm outfall structure adjacent to a watercourse, in order to
facilitate the development of the Lakeside Phase 3 residential subdivision.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2008 in accordance
with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:
• Letter of Undertaking prepared by Dillon Consulting, dated February 3, 2003 advising
that applicant will satisfy all TRCA concerns.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
871
Proposal:
The purpose is to construct a stormwater management pond on the east side of the Audley
Road South extension and a storm outfall structure adjacent to a watercourse, in order to
facilitate the development of the Lakeside Phase 3 residential subdivision. Although the
proposed stormwater management facility is not located within either a Fill Regulated Area or
Regional Storm Flood Plain, the proposal involves work within the drainage area of the
Warblers Swamp, a Provincially Significant Wetland, thus constituting an alteration to a
watercourse.
Control of Flooding:
The proposed works are not located within a Regional Storm Floodplain, and Authority staff are
satisfied that the proposal will have no impact on the control of flooding.
Pollution:
The stormwater management pond has been designed to incorporate permanent pool and
extended detention storage components to satisfy water quality and erosion control
requirements.
Conservation of Land:
The proposed wet pond and outfall are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain, with
the outfall designed with a flow spreader to dissipate flows prior to discharging into Warblers
Swamp. This large discharge area will not be affected by the relatively minor peak flow
increases discharged to the swamp. Detailed landscaping, restoration and planting will be
undertaken in order that all disturbed areas will be restored in conjunction with the
development of the subdivision. In addition, a wildlife crossing culvert will be installed under
Audley Road to order to maintain the natural wildlife corridor to and from Warblers Swamp and
the lands to the east.
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley
and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 32784
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For Information contact: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
Date: January 8, 2002
Application #: 013/02 /AJAX
RES. #B195/02 - PAPER SUPPLIES TENDER 2003
Award of Contract. Recommending award of 2003 paper supply contract
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Jim McMaster
THAT the tender for 2003 paper supplies from Cascades Resources be accepted, it being
the lowest quotation received that met specifications;
872
AND FURTHER THAT Coast Paper be awarded the contract for supply of paper not
available from Cascades Resources.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
The Authority annually purchases between $30,000 and $40,000 worth of paper supplies. As
the value of the contract is over $25,000 and pursuant to the purchasing policy, approval by the
Executive Committee is required.
ANALYSIS
The following companies were contacted for supply of paper to the Authority:
Buntin Reid
Cascade Resources
Coast Paper
Unisource
The Authority uses a wide variety of paper sizes and stocks. For purposes of evaluating values
on the tender, the pricing for 50% recycled, 81/2 X 11 paper was identified, it being the largest
volume purchased. Pricing for many of the other paper products most often used is available
in attachement 1.
Pricing was received from Buntin Reid, Cascade Resources and Coast Paper. Unisource sent
a note refraining from the tender process. Staff evaluated all bids. Cascade Resources bid of
$6.47 was accepted, it being the lowest price available. Also the staff analysis showed that
Cascades Resources has the most cost effective pricing for the balance of paper products.
Some products are not available from Cascade Resources. Coast Paper can supply these
products at competitve pricing.
Staff have been notified that this is the same pricing made available to the City of Toronto.
Staff will continue to monitor opportunities with member municipalities in the purchase of paper
products
Report prepared by: John Annunziello, extension 5272
For Information contact: John Annunziello, extension 5272
Date: January 22, 2003
Attachments: 1
873
Attachment 1
2003 PAPER PRICING
Paper /company
Cascade
Buntin Reid
Coast
Unisource
50% Recycled White
8 1/2 X 11
6.47
6.74 - 30%
7.25
No bid
8 1/2 X 14
8.29
8.64 - 30%
9.25
11X17
13.10
13.66 -30%
14.50
50% Recycled Colours
8 1/2 X 11
8.10
9.07 - 30%
9.50
81/2X14
10.50
11.57 -30%
12.15
11X17
16.20
18.14 -30%
19.00
50% - 8 1/2 X 11 Recycled, 241b. Writ
ng
Royal Fibre or Crushed Leaf
28.80
Sandpiper
20.72
23.00
Nekoosa Opaque
cougar 15.25
Cambric
44.05
26.70
Non - Recycled look, 8 1/2 X 11
Fusion 60 lb.
9.55
11.17
14.50
Fusion 70 Ib.
11.15
12.61
16.75
Plainfield 70 Ib.
11.00
12.39
13.75
Plainfield 80 Ib.
16.54
15.40
15.75
Brights 60 lb.
16.60
18.00
16.18
Cover 65 Ib. - white
23.50
26.40
23.50
874
RES. #B196/02 - FOREST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM - WINTER 2002/2003
Award of Plantation/Woodlot Thinning Contracts. To award plantation
thinning and woodiot management contracts (ES02 -19, ES02 -20 and
ES02 -22) to allow timely implementation of required forest management
activities under the TRCA's Managed Forest Program.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Jim McMaster
THAT the tender bids be received;
AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to enter into contractual agreements with the
successful bidder(s) and oversee the completion of the prescribed works as follows:
• ES02 -19 East Zone - Plantation Thinning be awarded to Conifer Farms Ltd.;
• ES02 -22 East Zone - Woodlot Thinning be awarded to Engs Wood Products;
• ES02 -20 West Zone - Plantation Thinning be awarded to Moggie Valley Timber Inc.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
As part of the ongoing Managed Forest Program, forestry staff annually review and prescribe
management works which include woodiot and plantation thinning projects. Over the past
several years, staff have advertized thinning contracts and entered into contractual agreements
with reputable forestry contractors to assist with the completion of the prescribed works in a
timely manner.
For ease of operational management, the 2002/2003 tenders were grouped into east and west
jurisdictional areas (see key map attached). Prospective bidders were sent information
packages outlining the scope of work, terms and conditions of sale, anticipated products and
estimated volumes pertaining to each of the tender contracts for their review.
The following contractors returned bids as noted below for review:
Contractor Name Bid Amount (applicable taxes incl.)
ES02 -19 East Zone - Plantation Thinning
• Conifer Farms Ltd.
• Breens Lumber & Planing Mills
Ben Hokum & Sons Ltd.
ES02 -22 East Zone - Woodlot Thinning
• Engs Wood Products
• Joe Billings
875
$28,392.76
$25,754.96
$17,953.95
$43,263.00
$12,327.40
ES02 -20 West Zone - Plantation Thinning
• Moggie Valley Timber Inc. $49,345.64
• Conifer Farms Ltd. $35,567.16
• Breens Lumber & Planing Mills $26,460.36
The tender bid period closed as of 12:00 noon on November 29, 2002. The sealed tender
process was not used in this call for bids as the anticipated value of each contract was
expected to be Tess than $25,000 based on the assessment of estimated volumes and values
and recent market forest commodity prices. The price variability expressed in bids received is
quite wide.
Staff have analyzed all of the bids received and are recommending that the highest bid amount
be accepted (as highlighted above) for each of the three separate contracts. Contract signing
is proposed to take place with the successful bidder(s) not later than February 7/03.
RATIONALE
The TRCA Managed Forest Tax Incentive Program calls for the annual completion of forest
management operations to maintain the high quality, health and integrity of forested tracts.
Based on the large number of hectares of forested lands in our holdings, staff have engaged
the use of reputable private sector forestry contractors to bolster project implementation of a
portion of the annual work schedule. This allows staff flexibility in scheduling to help achieve
MFTIP workplan targets, maintain the Authority's forested property tax reduction status and
produce a revenue stream that will enable the extension of program management operations
to those areas that are non - revenue producing (ie. no saleable product output). It also
provides program staff the opportunity to employ state -of- the -art equipment to complete
previously labour - intensive work in both an efficient and effective manner, while freeing staff
resources to complete other priority works.
Forestry activities that are scheduled for hardwood woodlot stands are generally scheduled for
the winter months when ground is usually frozen and flora dormant to minimize site
disturbance. Plantations may be managed during other seasons as they are for the most part
devoid of significant ground flora and some disturbance of the litter layer within the plantation
is desirable for the establishment of hardwood regeneration in an effort to aid the conversion of
plantations to a mixed forest composition.
All prescribed operations have been screened to assess the sensitivity of the individual sites in
terms potential for impact on floral and faunal species known to be present. Assessment
included the potential quantity and diversity of bird species, the surrounding landscape, and
the potential sensitivity to disturbance. The operating period of the contract(s) includes a
provision to suspend all forest operations during the peak nesting and rearing times or at
times when ground conditions do not allow for appropriate access.
876
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Proceeds of the sale of these forest products are to be deposited to the TRCA's Forest
Management Program budget, account no. 116 -04.
Report prepared by: Dave Rogalsky, extension 5378
For Information contact: Zoltan Kovacs, extension 5379
Date: January 10, 2003
Attachments: 1
877
Attachment 1
Toronto and Region Conservation Forest Management Contracts for 2003
6 0 5 10 16 20 Kilometers
U Tender Site for ES02 -22 East Zone - Woodiot Thinning
Tender Sites for ES02 -19 East Zone - Plantation Thinning
® Tender Sites for ES02-20 WestZone - Plantation Thinning
NMunbnd.shp
Base shp
0
S
878
RES. #B197/02 - REGIONAL WATERSHED MONITORING PROGRAM
Partnership with York University. Establishing a Partnership with York
University to develop a pilot web -based GIS application for the analysis,
distribution and receipt of data collected under the Authority's Regional
Watershed Monitoring Program in the Humber watershed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Jim McMaster
THAT the Authority enter into an agreement with York University to develop a pilot
web -based GIS application for the analysis, distribution and receipt of data collected
under the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program In the Humber watershed;
AND FURTHER THAT the Authority provide to the University a total of $35,000 in order to
support this work.
CARRIED
BACKGROUND
In 2001, the Authority initiated a Regional Watershed Monitoring Program in order to provide a
comprehensive, integrated and coordinated approach to environmental monitoring in the
Greater Toronto Area. The program includes the establishment of a Monitoring Network that
will endeavour to bring together a group of like- minded, cooperative agencies and
organizations to collect, store, distribute and report on environmental monitoring data that
furthers the interests of all involved parties. This Monitoring Network builds upon the existing
local and project - specific monitoring efforts of its partners.
Project Objectives
• To develop a program that provides the necessary information to assess the health of the
watersheds, subwatersheds, waterfront ecosystems, and RAP area, spatially and
temporally.
• To identify a set of indicators that reflect ecosystem condition, integrate the monitoring
requirements of the RAP with report cards for individual watersheds, and are compatible
with municipal state of the environment reporting and other broad programs like SOLEC,
for the Great Lakes basin, and the provincial policy performance indicators.
• To develop an efficient program that builds upon existing monitoring activities, avoids
duplication between agencies, municipalities, and organizations, is cost effective in
allocating the best use of resources and informs management decisions.
• To identify ways to engage and involve the public, interest, and school groups in
meaningful monitoring activities.
• To develop and obtain agreement from stakeholders on a set of monitoring protocols for
the collection, analysis, storage and distribution of data on the indicators that are identified.
879
This partnership focuses on the development a web -based data assessment and reporting
system to support the TRCA's Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. As a pilot project, its
purpose is to demonstrate how biological monitoring and abiotic data can be presented in a
geographic context to facilitate the sharing of watershed monitoring data with civic, scientific
and political stakeholders. In this web -based environment, results can be viewed in attribute
space (as line charts), and in a geographic context (via topographical maps). This will allow for
a better appreciation of potential physical factors in catchment areas that may influence
findings from in- stream monitoring activities. The geographic scope for this pilot project is the
Humber watershed.
A suite of indices using region - specific criteria are used to provide "roll -up" or an aggregate
evaluation for a specific monitoring site. For example, in another similar web -based application
(Map Reflections), ten (10) indices have successfully been used to characterize the community
composition and diversity of benthic macro invertebrates observed at a monitoring site. These
indicies include: Number of Taxa, Diversity, and Dominant Taxon. Results of this assessment
method are reported as: impaired, potentially impaired, or unimpaired. While the results are not
specific to the types of possible impacts, trends in the data may raise "red- flags ", and prompt
more intensive investigation.
Through a marriage of emerging Internet mapping technology and reporting applications,
community stakeholders can be engaged in more meaningful ways when watershed
monitoring information is being disseminated. Stakeholders will have the option of searching
and visualizing watershed monitoring information with greater ease, but also to contact existing
community -based environmental organizations (e.g., Citizens Environment Watch - CEW) to
consider participating in data collection, assessment and sharing information. The embodied
energy of shared interests, identity and trust - what has been called "social capital" - is
harnessed and focused to support the stewardship of the region's environment. This project
represents a small but important step toward integrated and reinforcing programs.
RATIONALE
One of the key elements of the Regional Monitoring Program is the data collected for each of
the indicators included in the program. The ability to analyse, interpret and report on the data,
to the program stakeholders including provincial agencies, municipal partners and the general
public is critical to the overall success and effectiveness of the monitoring program. Web
based reporting is yet another opportunity to make data available and understandable in a
watershed context.
The partnership with York University will not only facilitate the development of the web -based
application required for the data analysis and reporting /sharing, but will provide the Web /GIS
platform from which the application can be operated. This platform (ARCIMS) and the
infrastructure required to operate it are currently beyond the TRCA's IT and Web infrastructure
capabilities. Further, this partnership and work with York University also provides another
opportunity to further develop the monitoring "network" that has been identified under the
Regional Watershed Monitoring Program.
880
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Upon funding approval a MOU will be developed between TRCA and York University in order
to further detail the project and outline the specific roles and responsibilities of the partners. It
is anticipated that the development phase of the project will commence as early as March 1,
2003 with the final product completed and tested by September 15, 2003. This project will be a
collaborative effort among partners and probably a private software developer.
Following the analysis of the Humber pilot project, the additional development of the
application to support mapping and data from other watersheds in the TRCA jurisdiction will be
considered. It is anticipated that additional watersheds will be included in the application over
time, and that the web -site will continue to be hosted by York University as part of the Regional
Monitoring Network, or until such a time as the TRCA GIS and Web infrastructure could
facilitate it.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
TRCA agrees to provide support for this project at a total cost of $35,000, although additional
funding partners are being sought in order to defray the total costs The University will be
contributing approximately $22,500 in in -kind contribution to the project related to software
costs and the provision of graduate assistants. In addition, the University will contribute
(in -kind) approximately $2,000 /year related to the platform hosting costs as long as the
infrastructure remains at York. Funding to support this partnership is available through the
Regional Watershed Monitoring Program - Account No. 124 -30.
The further development of the application to support additional watersheds will be considered
following the completion, testing and review of the Humber pilot project. Funding opportunities
to support this additional work will be reviewed at that time.
Report prepared by: Scott Jarvie, extension 5312
For Information contact: Scott Jarvie, extension 5312
Date: January 24, 2003
RES. #B198/02 - WATERFRONT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
Database Requirements. Retention of consultation to undertake
database development in support of TRCA's Environmental Monitoring
Programs.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Jim McMaster
THAT the firm of Stoneleigh Associates be contracted to provide database development
and data management services in support of TRCA's Regional Watershed Monitoring and
Waterfront Environmental Monitoring Program, at a cost not to exceed $10,000, including
GST.
CARRIED
881
BACKGROUND
Staff have identified the need to update our database structure and data management system
in order to support various ongoing projects along the Toronto Waterfront.
It was further agreed that data collection, management and dissemination are key elements of
several products identified in the Authority's Business Plan and that in order to achieve this in
the long term, a full time data management consultant should be hired. This need has been
reflected in the Business Plan and budget process. In the interim, there is a need to hire a
consultant to modernize the database architecture required to store, manipulate and output
data that is required at the present time, and to facilitate efficient and secure data storage in the
future.
Previously a database structure was developed for several data storage needs related to
aquatic habitat and species, water quality, fluvial geomorphology and meteorology. Staff have
further identified the need for a database to store sediment quality data from the watershed
and waterfront. The management and effective use of this data is critical in meeting the
Authority's reporting requirements to our funding partners in 2003/04, including the City of
Toronto, Region of York and Region of Peel. This database would be set using the same
architectural structure as the TRCA's relational database (EnviroBase)
RATIONALE
Stoneleigh Associates is recognized as an expert with 20 years of experience in the field of
database design and data management. This firm had previously been recommended to the
Authority by the Province and the Credit Valley Conservation Authority, and was retained by the
TRCA in 2001 to initiate the development of a relational database to store, link and manage the
increasing variety and amount of environmental data generated through TRCA programs. They
were also retained by TRCA in 2002 to develop the fluvial geomorphology component of the
relational database for the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program.
Staff have been pleased with previous work undertaken by this firm, and based on these
positive results, the consultant was asked to provide preliminary cost estimates for this
additional work. Upon review of their proposal, staff are recommending Stoneleigh Associates
be retained again in order to ensure consistency both; internally to integrate with relational
databases previously developed for the Authority; and, externally to neighboring CA's and
other partners who have utilized Stoneleigh to develop similar systems. Staff are not aware of
another firm that could undertake this work at a lower fee structure, or that would offer the
same level of expertise and familiarity with the operations of the Authority.
It is expected that the results of this database development will be shared with other
Conservation Authorities who are developing similar data management systems and who
might benefit form this work. It is anticipated that this work will further the development of
standardized protocol for the storage and reporting of environmental information to our
municipal partners.
DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE
Based on discussions with staff, Stoneleigh Associates has provided a proposal and cost
summary of one database component that has been identified, as follows:
882
Environmental Monitoring- Sediment Quality Component, development $8,172.50 including
GST.
As part of their work, the consultant will provide database design (including
tables /fields /relationships, data entry/review forms, data importing and parsing, customized
queries, summary reports) as well as training /documentation /demonstration for Authority staff.
FINANCIAL DETAILS
An upset limit for the work identified has been set at $10,000.00 including GST. The upper limit
for this work reflects the development cost outlined in the attached proposal along with
contingency to support the additional import of TRCA's historical sediment quality data Staff
have determined that it would be more cost effective for Stoneleigh Associates to complete this
task. The estimates provided by the consultant have been identified as conservative upper
limits, and in fact the work may be completed for less than the projected amount. Funding to
support this work has been identified within the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program and
the Waterfront Monitoring Program. Accounts Identified: 124 -30, 240 -01.
Report prepared by: Rick Portiss, extension 5302
For Information contact: Rick Portiss, extension 5302
Date: January 30, 2003
RES.#B199/02 - REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATION FEES FOR PLANNING SERVICES
Service level trend analysis for Development Services Section. The
Plan Review Fee Schedule used by Development Services is due for
review, and updating in association with an implementation approach
with municipal partners.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Ron Moeser
Michael Di Biase
THAT the Authority implement a revised schedule of plan review fees as shown in the
attached revised schedule.
THAT the Authority continue to monitor the plan review services and the fees collection
process internally, and establish a dialogue with partner municipalities about improving
administration fee collection performance as a joint effort.
CARRIED
883
BACKGROUND
TRCA staff initiated a planning and permit fee schedule in 1998. At the time, this new charging
practice for administration fees was negotiated with UDI, the regional municipalities, and other
conservation authorities. The planning fee schedule for Development Services Section (DSS)
included applications such as: consents and variances, land division, site plans, subdivision
and condominium plans, and Planning Act amendments. At the time these schedules were
discussed, the development industry and municipalities indicated that the cost of the plan
review service would be monitored for a period and that the fee schedule would be revisited.
Permitting fee charges were updated and approved by the Executive in 2001. However, the
planning fees have not been reviewed or updated for 5 years. Development services staff have
been researching and analyzing the fee collection trends for three years and have assessed
the current status of fees charged and collected, and have determined the appropriateness of
the fees charged for plan services.
Our current fee schedule includes three stages of fee eligibility: the initial preliminary analysis
fee, a processing fee for technical review and a final clearance fee. Not all applications would
receive all charges during their review. The preliminary fee should be received at the
application outset, while other fees are charged as the application is being reviewed, or
conditions are being finalized.
This report outlines the status of fee collection within the jurisdiction, trends in the planning
application level of service, and recommends ways to improve fee collection, and change to a
more suitable fee schedule.
Issues
Significant changes have occurred in the planning responsibilities and level of service for DSS
over the last 3 to 5 year period. There are concerns that Development Services revenue is
lower than anticipated over the last three years, as well as, our current fee schedule is
somewhat out -of -date after 5 years of an intense development economy.
Increases in planning applications and construction implementation across the TRCA
jurisdiction have resulted in severe strain on staff workload for DSS and technical resource staff
(ecologists, water resource engineers, geotechnical engineers, aquatic biologists, etc), in both
areas of planning and permit review. Our ability to provide the level of service that was given 5
years ago has been challenged. Changes in the nature and volume of DSS's planning and
review work, as well as, the fast tracked pace of the municipal development scene has put
significant strain on our small staff section and the level of planning service for the jurisdiction.
DSS has 5 senior planners, 4 plans analysts, 7 planning technicians for the whole jurisdiction.
884
There are inconsistencies between the different municipalities in terms of their level of support
and administrative discipline to assist us in obtaining our appropriate fee. It is extremely
important to the TRCA to obtain the preliminary fee charge at the outset of an application
process. Several municipalities, such as Caledon, Ajax, Brampton, Pickering are excellent at
ensuring that preliminary administration fees are collected from the applicant before the files
are sent to the Authority for processing. Other municipalities build into their MOU agreements
that fees are the responsibility of TRCA only, and remove any leverage ability that TRCA has in
obtaining these fees upfront from applicants. Some development review offices have been
experiencing a huge staff turnover in the busy development period of the last few years; so fee
collection is somewhat "hit or miss ". Often, new planners are unclear about TRCA's role in
planning review, or the requirements for fees. All new municipal staff require training efforts
related to this authority's policies and requirements in plan review.
Dialogue with Markham, Richmond Hill, and Vaughan needs to be undertaken about
refinements to the development review process, fee collection and screening process.
TRCA staff also need more training about the discipline of managing plan review and fee
collection. Current invoicing practices have resulted in poor tracking of billing and payment
performance. An informal notice of the requirement to pay a fee, is often not enough impetus to
spur payment of fees. More training with inexperienced staff about fee procedures has shown
marked differences even over a six month period.
In the past, municipalities and UDI have been sensitive to adding another layer of fees to the
planning approval process. Business planning in all organizations necessitate reviews of cost
recovery and standards of service and performance. After a 5 year period in demanding
development boom times the updating of the fee schedule is overdue. An overview of our level
of service is also overdue.
Consultation to Date
TRCA staff have consulted with other conservation authorities about their planning review
trends and their need to change fee schedules. As well, we have consulted with the York
Region Chapter of UDI to discuss the TRCA's level of service, policy issues /changes for 2003
and our anticipated fee schedule change.
The Halton Region and Credit Valley Conservation Authorities are also in the process of
altering their 2003 fee schedule to reflect increasing demands for plan review. It was
interesting to note that each Conservation Authority has slight variations in their schedule to
suit different types of applications peculiar to their watershed. However, our fees, and
anticipated changes, are certainly in line with one another. These CA's also believe that the
cost of reviewing applications has increased rapidly with greater efforts needed for technical
review and input.
The Halton Region, Credit Valley and Grand River Conservation Authorities have simple
methods for tracking general staff time spent on applications by type. Subdivision plans were
considered to be the most time consuming efforts for professional review. The demand for
multiple technical reviews also strained the professional teams at these authorities.
885
Halton Region and Credit Valley noted that they do not have problems collecting preliminary
fees from applicants through the review procedures of their partner municipalities. Halton goes
as far as including clearance fee payment as part of the draft plan terms and conditions. Halton
has a bylaw that protects them in getting their fees. Halton's fee schedule opens the
opportunity to bill on an hourly rate ($75 /hour) for multiple technical reviews. Both Authorities
are struggling with the issue of setting targets for cost recovery. 50% seems to be a
comfortable level of cost recovery, although many financial planning staff and Boards
members believe it should be closer to 75 %.
For interest, the development services section of Credit Valley Conservation Authority has an
annual budget of $1.2 million dollars. For comparison purposes, TRCA's Development
Services Section had a 2002 annual budget of $1.1 million dollars for a much larger jurisdiction
with a diverse municipal planning demand.
Our meeting with UDI explored their concerns about TRCA's current level of service. They had
no problem with minor changes to the fee schedule, as long as the level of service is improved.
Considerable discussion evolved around establishing realistic expectations for application
timelines and plan review. TRCA staff strives to complete reviews in 30 — 60 days. It was made
clear to UDI members that applications that do not come close to our current policies create a
situation that could be potentially much longer to resolve. Improvements to collecting plan
review fees were seen as providing opportunities to increase our staffing complement, thus
improving review response. UDI members offered their support to create an improved fee
collection climate with applicants and with the municipalities.
Trends in TRCA Development Review and Permitting (2000 to 2002)
The volume of planning applications has remained fairly stable over the last three years,
however many files extend from one year to the next in workload:
2002 -1100 new planning applications (excluding EA's, studies /reports, secondary plans)
2001 - 1200
The introduction of streamlining and screening in municipalities has reduced the number of
applications outside TRCA's areas of interest. Though the number of applications is stable, the
number of complex planning applications has increased.
Permit applications have increased dramatically in our jurisdiction over the last three years as
well, with a 37% increase from 2001. Permit application increases have been primarily in York
Region and Toronto.
There has also been a significant increase in environmental assessment project (EA)
applications:
2002 - 50 submitted
2001 - 29 submitted
886
These projects have practically doubled in 2002, with indications from municipalities that the
rise in EA work is continuing to increase. TRCA has received a 10 year EA plan from York
Region outlining 20 upcoming EA's. Peel Region is about to release numerous EA's that have
been on hold.
Region of Peel
Planning applications have increased 29% from 2002 to 2002.
Permit applications have increased by 58% over the last year, and increased 140% since 1999.
Region of Durham
Durham has remained steady and low in terms of volume of planning and permit review
applications to date.
The initiation of further planning and review work for Seaton and East Duffins will change this
situation soon.
Region of York
Planning applications have increased by 18% over the last year, 20% since 1999.
Permit applications have increased by 59% since 1999.
City of Toronto
Planning applications have increased by 9% over the last year, and increased 20% since 1999.
Permit applications have increased 22% over the last year, and increased 28% since 1999.
Our review shows that the dramatic increases in both types of planning and permitting
applications have created a serious problem in terms of adequate "ramp up" of services in
DSS, as well as in our Resource Science Section. Although a modest increase in staff was
made this year to assist in covering the workload, adequate "ramp up" of services to cover the
sudden leaps in applications has been impossible under our current funding approach.
There are several other important trends /factors that affect the level of planning service at
TRCA. These include:
• Increase in OMB hearing efforts (11 hearings in 2001 alone) and specialized
facilitation /negotiation for clearance.
• Increase in new applications /planning studies expected in Richmond Hill, Markham,
and Durham.
• Increase in specialized planning and technical review associated with the Rouge Park &
Oak Ridges moraine Conservation Plan.
• Increase in specialized planning efforts associated with new initiatives including
Terrestrial Natural Heritage, Generic Regulation, City of Toronto Ravine Bylaw, updating
current TRCA policies.
• Growing expectation from the Province and our municipal partners for shorter
commenting periods as part of the "red tape reductions" and possible "development
permit" approaches.
887
Trends in Collection of Planning Fees
DSS has analyzed the trends in the collection of planning fees across the jurisdiction, and has
completed detailed reports for each municipality. The analysis shows general trends in
payment of fees, and highlights areas where both the TRCA and municipality could improve
performance in fee collection.
Planning Fee Revenue across the jurisdiction is summarized below
Total Fees chargeable in 2002: $ 355,000
Total Revenue in 2002: $ 217,300
TOTAL FEES OUTSTANDING IN 2002 $ 137,700
Total Fees chargeable in 2001
Total Fees revenue in 2001
TOTAL FEES OUTSTANDING IN 2001
$ 347,000
$ 162,000
$ 185,000
Fee collection improved slightly in 2002 in the last two quarters, as training in billing
procedures for new staff improved.
According to our records approximately 40 -50% of our chargeable fees are not being collected
across the jurisdiction. This situation contributes to a negative impact on available funds for
new staff and our cost recovery in DSS, and subsequently our level of service. Significant
improvements can be made to improve internal TRCA fees collection procedures, and with
cooperation from our partner municipalities to improve fee collection at the preliminary and
clearance stages of plan applications.
Reports have been attached for each municipality to study the general fee collection
performance in each jurisdiction. It should be noted that our data base records are excellent
for tracking preliminary fee records for applicants.
Our stats also do not account for all applications that are screened, and not processed
because there is no objection. Despite streamlining efforts, DSS still has a high volume of
these type of applications which contribute to increased time and workload, particularly in York
Region.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Currently, the annual budget of $1.1 million for DSS targets 50% cost recovery for the section's
overall cost of operation (excluding all scientist and technical support). In 2002, DSS actually
met this target inclusive of collective revenue from municipal planning fees, property clearance,
solicitor inquiries and permits.
In 2002, the municipal plan review function, on its own, actually recovered 66% of its targeted
revenue. It is important to note, however, that the level of service provided in 2002 is not
supportable in the long run. Increases in revenue from fee collection in the near future must
help to improve staff review capabilities and efficiencies. Our analysis indicates that there is
significant improvement to be made in the collection of existing chargeable fees.
Improvements in this effort, coupled with a modest fee schedule increase will over the next
year or two improve TRCA's ability to administer a more effective municipal plan review
function relative to the increase in applications that we anticipate.
888
The environmental planning function and technical support that TRCA provides is an essential
component of sound planning in our nine watersheds. We request support from Board
members, and our partner municipalities to actively improve procedures for plan review
administration fee collection for TRCA, with the ultimate goal of improving our level of service
during peak periods of development growth.
TRCA staff offers the following recommendations:
Immediate Term Action
• Implement the proposed fee schedule, as attached.
The key revisions to the schedule include:
Modest changes to the preliminary fee category including alterations of between $25 -50
Processing fees have predominately remained the same
Requirements for a clearance fee is made mandatory
Field visits beyond one full initial assessment should be billed separately
Additional processing fees will be invoiced for multiple technical reviews where
warranted
• Implement an immediate internal invoicing procedure with accounting at TRCA, to assist
DSS staff implement the fee collection process, and track more effective payment per
applicant. Implement a process for collecting unpaid fees (owed) fees — the onus is on
TRCA staff.
• Review this fee schedule and its implications with UDI, and other conservation authorities.
• Initiate an information session and dialogue directly with each municipal planning and
development review department to discuss issues of improvements to level of
service /communication, streamlining procedures, and fee application /collection
requirements. (This dialogue has already begun with the City of Toronto and Brampton).
TRCA needs to address the collection of fees where municipalities are not collecting for us
at applications outset.
Mid Term Action
• Establish a protocol with applicants for a "fee first" approach to collecting processing fees
(as time allows).
• Implement a simple tracking system, with DSS and technical staff only, to monitor the time
spent on certain types of municipal planning applications. This procedure would be
tailored not be an onerous task for staff, and would provide valuable information for future
reporting and budgeting purposes.
Longer Term
• Continue to prepare quarterly tracking of the municipal plan review process at TRCA,
inclusive of municipal and permitting application status reports, fee collection summaries,
and trend analysis for determining the level of service in plan review and input.
889
• Maintain a continuing dialogue with our partner municipalities, the development industry
and other conservation authorities to improve our level of service, the efficiency of
application review and fee collection performance. Agreement changes need to be
updated in memorandums of understanding for technical review and plan clearance.
Report prepared by: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214
For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214
Date: January 31, 2003
Attachments: 2
890
Attachment 1
EXISTING CONSERVATION AUTHORITY FEE SCHEDULE FOR PLANNING SERVICES
APPLICATION TYPE
PRELIMINARY
ANALYSIS FEE
PROCESSING/
PRELIMINARY
APPROVALS FEE
*only if technical
studies /field work required
FINAL
CLEARANCE FEE
*only if technical
studies /field work required
Variances
$100
N/a
N/a
Site Plan
* or comparable
condominium applic.
$150
$1500
Included in Processing /PA
Fee
Official Plan
Amendment (OPA)
$150
$1500
Included in Processing /PA
Fee unless a staged
approval is required then
$1500
Zoning By -law
Amendment/
Rezoning (ZBA/RZ)
$150
$1500
Included in Processing /PA
Fee unless a staged
approval is required (e.g.
Golfcourse in valley) then
$1500
Special By -law
Application
N/a
$1500
Included in Processing /PA
Fee
Consent/Severance /
Land Division
$150
$750
Included in Processing /PA
Fee
Subdivision
* or comparable
condominium applic.
$500
$2000 if preceded by
approved MESP or
subwatershed study
$2500 if not preceded by
approved MESP or
subwatershed study
$250 if no technical
studies /field work required
$2000 if preceded by
approved MESP or
subwatershed study
$2500 if not preceded by
approved MESP or
subwatershed study
891
Attachment 2
Draft January 21, 2003
PROPOSED CONSERVATION AUTHORITY FEE SCHEDULE FOR PLANNING SERVICES
APPLICATION TYPE
PRELIMINARY
ANALYSIS FEE
PROCESSING/
PRELIMINARY
APPROVALS FEE
(only if technical
studies /field work
required)
FINAL
CLEARANCE FEE
(only if technical
studies /field work
required)
Concept +
Property Inquiry
$100
N/A
N/A
Variances *
$125
$200
$50
Site Plan *
$200
$1,500
$100
Official Plan
Amendment (OPA) *
$200
$1,500 **
$250
Zoning By -law
Amendment/
Rezoning (ZBA/RZ) *
$200
$1,500 **
$250
Consent/Severance /
Land Division *
$200
$800 **
$100
Subdivision
(or comparable
condominium
application) *
$650
**
$2,000 if preceded by
approved MESP or
subwatershed study
$2,500 if not preceded by
approved MESP or
subwatershed study
$250 if no technical
studies /field work
required
$2,000 for technical
clearance
* include one (1) site visit only for assessment purposes.
** additional fees will be invoiced for applications requiring multiple technical reviews.
Revision to Permit Fees - Property Clearance - $200
892
TERMINATION
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 10:53 a.m., on Friday, February 7, 2003.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
t■
THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #14/02
February 21, 2003
The Executive Committee Meeting #14/02, was held in the Victoria Room, Black Creek
Pioneer Village, on Friday, February 21, 2003. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting
to order at 9:15 a.m.
PRESENT
Lorna Bissell Member
Irene Jones Member
Jim McMaster Vice Chair
Dick O'Brien Chair
Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member
REGRETS
Maria Augimeri Member
Michael Di Biase Member
Ron Moeser Member
RES. #B200/02 - MINUTES
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
Irene Jones
THAT the Minutes of Meeting #13/02, held on February 7, 2003, be approved.
CARRIED
CORRESPONDENCE
(a) A confidential letter dated February 19, 2003, from Joanne Appleyard of 27 Kingsbury
Crescent, Scarborough, in regards to item 7.1.1 - 986506 Ontario Ltd. o/a Grand
Homes.
894
RES. #B201 /02 - CORRESPONDENCE
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Irene Jones
THAT above -noted correspondence (a) be received.
CARRIED
SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
RES. #B202 /02 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO
REGULATION 158
Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway. Pursuant to Ontario
Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:
(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in
or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm;
(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the
schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on
such area from some other place or places;
(c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek,
stream, or watercourse.
A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the
conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Jim McMaster
Gerri Lynn O'Connor
THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application
7.1.1 - 986506 Ontario Ltd. o/a Grand Homes, which is listed below.
CARRIED
CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)
7.1.1 986506 ONTARIO LTD. O/A GRAND HOMES
To place fill within a regulated area on Part Block J, Plan 1538, (25 Kingsbury
Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area),
Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by 986506 Ontario Ltd.
o/a Grand Homes.
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Lake
Ontario Waterfront to facilitate the construction of a new single family residence adjacent to the
Scarborough Bluffs.
The permit will be issued for the period of February 7, 2003 to February 6, 2005.
895
• Red -line Revised Site Plan, prepared by Grand Homes Ltd., dated December 2002,
date received December 9, 2002.
RATIONALE
The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:
Proposal:
The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area associated with the Lake
Ontario Waterfront to facilitate the construction of a new single family residence with attached
rear deck, adjacent to the Scarborough Bluffs. The home previously occupying the site, owned
by Jo Anne Appleyard, was demolished last fall and the present owner is proposing to
construct a new house situated between the street and the old building footprint, being located
approximately 10 metres further away from the Bluffs than the old house, with the rear deck
maintaining a minimum 26.5 metre setback from the top of bank of the Bluffs.
Control of Flooding:
The subject property is located entirely above the Regulatory Floodplain associated with the
Lake Ontario shoreline and therefore, the proposed works will not impact the storage or
conveyance of flood waters.
Pollution:
A silt fence will be installed directly behind the proposed works in order to prevent the overland
migration of construction - generated sediment into Lake Ontario.
Conservation of Land:
Along this reach of the Scarborough Bluffs, extensive shoreline erosion has occurred.
Consequently, the TRCA and the City of Toronto has undertaken extensive toe revetment and
slope stabilization works to protect the existing structures along the Bluffs. The subject
property has previously been reviewed by this Authority in conjunction with a consent
application, File B46/98 and a permit application by Jo Anne Appleyard in 2000. In this regard,
a geotechnical analysis and an addendum to the original report were submitted to and
reviewed by TRCA staff, which established a 10 metre setback from the projected long -term
stable slope line. Due to the unique and dynamic features of the Scarborough Bluffs, TRCA
staff requested that an additional 10 metre structural setback be utilized to permit a margin of
safety for new construction, for a total setback of 20 metres from the top of bank. The
proposed rear deck will maintain a minimum 26.5 metre setback from the top of bank, while the
house itself will be situated approximately 30 metres back from the top of bank. No significant
resources features will be impacted by the house construction and the proposed works are
consistent with existing development along the Scarborough Bluffs. There are no slope
stability /geotechnical issues associated with the project.
896
Policy Guidelines:
The proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(G) - Infilling - and Section 4.2.2(D) - Replacement
Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.
CFN: 33816
Report Prepared by: Nora Jamieson, extension 5259
For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306
Date: December 16, 2002
TERMINATION
Application #: 453/02/TOR
ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:19 a.m., on Friday, February 21, 2003.
Dick O'Brien
Chair
/ks
J. Craig Mather
Secretary- Treasurer
897