The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWatershed Management Advisory Board Appendices 2002THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 January 17, 2002 Page F1 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #1102, was held in Committee Room 4, at the North York Civic Centre, 5100 Yonge Street, in the City of Toronto, on Thursday, January 17, 2002. Mark Wilson, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT Barbara Anderson Member Karen Boniface Markham Staff Liaison Margaret Buchinger Member Stephen Cockle Member Geoffrey Cook Member Don Cross Vice -Chair Paula Davies Member Michael DeAngelis Vaughan Staff Liaison Laurian Farrell Member Moyra Haney Member Peter Heinz Member Lorna Krawchuk Member Deb Martin -Downs Member Helen Mills Member Roslyn Moore Member Dick O'Brien Member Douglas OBright Member Janice Palmer Member Mel Plewes Member Eduard Sousa Toronto Parks Staff Liaison Mark Wilson Chair GUESTS Francis Cadeau Past Don Council Member Eric Taylor City of Vaughan Gary Welsh City of Toronto STAFF Adele Freeman Don /Highland Watershed Specialist Craig Mather CAO - TRCA Jason Scott Planner, Development Services - TRCA Kathy Stranks Executive Assistant - TRCA Amy Thurston Don Watershed Technical Assistant F2 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 January 17, 2002 RES. #F1 /02 - MINUTES OF MEETING #5/01 Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Buchinger Don Cross THAT the minutes of Meeting #501, held on November 15, 2001 be approved .. CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE 3.1 Letter to Barry Gutteridge, City of Toronto; dated November 20, 2001; from John Wilson, Chair, Task Force to bring Back the Don; regarding Salt Management Plan 3.2 Letter to Barry Gutteridge, City of Toronto; dated November 20, 2001; from John Wilson, Chair, Task Force to bring Back the Don; regarding Snow Disposal Study 3.3 Letter to Mr. Mark Wilson; dated December 7, 2001; from David Caplan, MPP, regarding public hearings on Bill 122. 3.4 Letter to The Honourable Michael D. Harris; from John Hirsch, Chair, Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force dated January 9, 2002; copied to Mark Wilson; regarding "Provincial Sustainable Water Strategy and Comprehensive Provincial Water Policy" RES. #F2/02 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Peter Heinz Roslyn Moore THAT Correspondence Items 3.1 to 3.4 inclusive, be received CARRIED INFORMATION 4.1 Staff Report to Authority Meeting #9/01, November 23, 2001 entitled "Lower Don River Environmental Assessment and Functional Design Study" WMI January 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 F3 4.2 Staff Report to Authority Meeting #9/01, November 23, 2001 entitled "City of Toronto Central Waterfront Part II Plan "Making Waves" 4.3 Staff Report to Authority Meeting #9/01, November 23, 2001 entitled "Oak Ridges Moraine Legislation (Bill 122) And Conservation Plan" 4.4 Final Submission of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council on the "Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan" 4.5 Letter from Mark Wilson regarding Legislation Bill 122, Oak Ridges Moraine 4.6 Staff report to the Humber Watershed Alliance, Meeting #1/02, January 15, 2002; entitled "Water Source Protection Initiatives ". 4.7 Staff Report to the Humber Watershed Alliance, Meeting #1/02, January 15, 2002; entitled "Designation of Road Salt as a Toxic Substance ". 4.8 Staff Report to the Humber Watershed Alliance, Meeting #1/02, January 15, 2002; entitled "Snow Disposal Feasibility Study - City of Toronto ". RES. #F3/02 - INFORMATION Moved by: Seconded by: Moyra Haney Margaret Buchinger THAT Information Items 4.1 to 4.8 inclusive be received CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest. Wrl 3 F4 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 January 17, 2002 PRESENTATIONS Mr. Gary Welsh, Director District 4 Transportation, Works and Emergency Services, City of Toronto spoke on the new City of Toronto Snow Feasibility Study. RES. #F4/02 - CITY OF TORONTO SNOW DISPOSAL FEASIBILITY STUDY Moved by: Seconded by: Mel Plewes Lorna Krawchuk THAT the Policy & Advocacy Team review the Toronto study and supply comments to the February 21, 2002 meeting of the Don Council; AND FURTHER THAT Mr. Gary Welsh, Director District 4 Transportation, Works and Emergency Services, of the City of Toronto, be thanked for his presentation to the Don Council. CARRIED PRESENTATION Mr. Welsh was requested to present the Executive Summary of the Snow Disposal Feasibility Study. He outlined the conclusions of the summary, which are listed below: 1. The City's snow disposal target is reasonable and establishes the need for disposal capacity. 2. Snow disposal sites are being lost since the storm of January 1999. 3. No new acceptable land disposal sites are available. 4. Remaining existing snow disposal sites do not provide sufficient capacity to meet the established target. 5. Significant improvements to the current snow disposal sites can be made by relatively simple, low cost measures. 6. Portable melters offer the best alternative for providing additional snow disposal capacity. 7. Melt water discharge treatment measures can remove many pollutants but not chlorides. 8. Discharges from most snow disposal sites drain through the City's creeks, streams and rivers. 9. The impacts of snow disposal sites are not well understood in quantitative terms. 10. The justification for relocating or replacing the snow disposal sites located near rivers is not clearly established. January 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 F5 He then outlined the recommendations, listed below: City of Toronto recommended that: 1. The general principles and policies established for the City's wet weather flow be followed. 2. The following sites, formally used for snow disposal, no longer be used: - Leslie Street Spit - Humber Filtration Plan (Bonar Wetland) - Finch West of Leslie - Gerrard Street - Lawrence Under Bayview - Skymark Park 3. Snow disposal be recognized as valid land use necessary for the provision of an important service delivery function and that tenure (i.e., right to use site on an on -going basis) for the remaining primary and emergency sites be obtained. 4. The capacity provided by the above sites be shared among the Districts to best utilize this available capacity. 5. The lower cost mitigation and enhancement measures are installed at all primary land disposal sites as soon as possible. 6. The overall management of snow disposal operations be improved. 7. The additional capacity required to meet the City's snow disposal target be provided by a portable melter and it is further recommended that these portable melters be located at sites where the meltwater discharges either directly or via storm sewers to the lake. 8. Additional environmental monitoring, modelling and reporting be performed. 9. Site specific designs and detailed cost estimates for the installation of major mitigation measures at the existing snow disposal sites be prepared. 10. The issue of either enhancing or replacing the snow disposal sites located near rivers be reconsidered in several years time. RES. #F5/02 - "ANOTHER YARD FOR THE DON" Moved by: Seconded by: Peter Heinz Don Cross THAT Deb Martin -Downs be thanked for her slide presentation on the program "Another Yard for the Don ". CARRIED BACKGROUND Deb Martin -Downs developed a slide presentation to promote FODE's program "Another Yard for the Don ". Copies of the slide presentation are.available through FODE, the Don Council or Deb Martin- Downs. F6 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 January 17, 2002 RES. #F6/02 - EAGLES NEST GOLF COURSE Moved by: Seconded by: Don Cross Deb Martin -Downs THAT Michael DeAngelis, Commissioner of Planning and Urban Design, City of Vaughan, Eric Taylor, Senior Planner, Planning and Urban Design, City of Vaughan, and Jason Scott, Development Services, TRCA be thanked for providing information on the Maple Valley Plan, the Eagles Nest Golf Course application, and the activities of York Major Holdings with respect to the cutting of trees within the McGill ESA. CARRIED BACKGROUND OPA 535 , passed July 10, 2000 (by -law 279 -2000) by the City of Vaughan, implemented the Maple Valley Plan. The purpose of the Amendment was to introduce new policies respecting land use surrounding and in the vicinity of the Keele Valley Landfill and, in particular, establish land use objectives for the area will be integrated with the planned closure of Keele Valley Landfill. The Maple Valley Plan recognized the ESA/ANSI lands as an integral component of the overall plan and recommended that no development intrusion occur. A proposal for the potential expansion of golf course uses into portions of the ESA/ANSI (up to approximately 13.2 ha) was presented prior to the passing of OPA 535. A provision which would allow for golf course expansion subject to the following: "Expansion of the golf course use planned on adjacent lands into a portion of the ANSI /ESA may be permitted subject to an amendment to the Zoning By -Law provided it has been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City in consultation with the Toronto Region Conservation Authority and the Ministry of Natural Resources that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or the ecological functions for which the area is identified" (Section 5.1.2, OPA 535) On October 10, 2000, the City passed by -law 427 -2000 which implemented the specific land use zoning for the Maple Valley Plan area. The ESA/ANSI lands are identified as Open Space with a Holding provision (OS1 -H), allowing for golf course uses on the ESA/ANSI lands. While the by -law makes no specific reference to the requirement for a satisfactory EIS, OPA 535 does require no negative impacts be demonstrated. An amendment to the zoning by -law to lift the Holding provision will be required to implement the land use final zoning to permit the golf course in the ESA/ANSI lands. Apparently 4.3 hectares of the ESA /ANSI was cut prior to any amendment lifting the Holding provision. The Region of York has confirmed that Regional staff are investigating this action taken by the owners or their agents but no information was available regarding the laying of charges under the Tree Cutting By -Law. January 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 F7 POLICY ISSUES RES. #F7/02 - EAGLES NEST GOLF COURSE Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Buchinger Janice Palmer WHEREAS the first principle of "Forty Steps to a New Don" is the protection of the existing natural areas within the watershed; WHEREAS the Don Watershed Regeneration Council has previously expressed interest in the planning for the Maple Valley area; WHEREAS the Council invited representatives of York Major Holdings to provide background on the proposed development of the Eagles Nest Golf Course in the City of Vaughan, which it declined; WHEREAS approximately 4.3 ha of the McGill ESA were subsequently cleared of vegetation in contravention of the York Region Tree By -Law and is currently being investigated by staff of the Region of York; WHEREAS a Holding Provision was applied to the site to ensure, among other matters, that the application demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City in consultation with the TRCA and the MNR, that no negative impacts to the natural features or ecological ' functions for which the area was identified, would result from the proposal, (Eagles Nest Golf Course North Portion, Environmental Impact Statement, LGL International, Sept 14, 2001); WHEREAS this site would fall in the area identified as Core under the recently promulgated Oak Ridges Moraine Legislation; LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the Don Watershed Regeneration Council directs its Chair to take the necessary action to raise this issue with the Province, the Region of York, the City of Vaughan, and the public; THAT the Chair register the deep concern felt by the Council and request that the Province of Ontario, and the Region of York, and the City of Vaughan take whatever actions possible to ensure that this occurrence does not set a dangerous precedent which is an affront to all those who have worked to protect such areas; AND FURTHER THAT the Chair be directed specifically to: • contact local Vaughan groups (specifically Vaughan Cares) and York Region Don environmental groups to discuss the situation and apprise them of the Council's concern F8 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 January 17, 2002 • contact groups that have been engaged in recent efforts to protect the Oak Ridges Moraine and advise them of the destruction of a portion of the ESA; • write to the Mayor and councillors of the City of Vaughan, to the Region of York, and the Province of Ontario urging that charges be laid under the York Region Tree By -Law; • write to the owners York Major Holdings advising them of the Don Council's concerns; and, . • advise the media of the destruction of a portion of the McGill ESA. KEY ISSUE A proposed golf course being undertaken as part of the Maple Valley Secondary Plan suggests that a portion of the golf course may impact on the McGiII ESA. The site is owned by York Major Holdings Inc. This area is part of the Core Natural Heritage Area as recently defined in the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. CURRENT STATUS The representatives of York Major Holdings Inc. had originally agreed to provide an overview of the planning being undertaken for the proposed Eagles Nest Golf Course at the Don Watershed Regeneration Council meeting scheduled for December 13, 2001. When the presentation was withdrawn as the consulting team was unavailable, the Don Council meeting was cancelled. However, over the next week it became apparent to staff of the TRCA, that in addition to the grading of the smaller portion of the site, there appeared to be some forest clearing in the vicinity of the ESA. The Regional Forester for the Regional Municipality of York was alerted to the activity. It is the understanding of the TRCA staff that a stop work order was issued by the Region, and that an investigation was undertaken. Representatives of York Major Holdings have declined to be present at the January Don Council meeting. Staff will continue to seek clarification as to the present status of this site, the extent of the clearing activities, and any charges that may be laid. Mark Wilson, Chair of the Don Council has contacted Mr. Alan Wells, Chief Administrative Office for the Region of York, and Regional Councillor DiBiase to express the concerns of the Don Council. Margaret Casey has spoken to Leonard Mundt, York Region's Forester. BACKGROUND As part of the Maple Valley Secondary Plan which incorporates the closure of the Keele Valley Landfill, the City of Vaughan and the Region of York approved a Secondary Plan of which the majority of future land use was shown as recreation - based, including a proposed golf course. Integral to the Secondary Plan is the McGill Environmentally Significant Area which was designated for its role as a high quality hydrological source area for the Don, the presence of regionally rare plant species, and the presence of a high quality maple beech forest community. The McGiII ESA is also considered an ANSI by MNR ( "Forty Steps to a New Don ", 1994) wMg January 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 F9 As part of the preliminary submission, the golf course applicants in 2000, indicated the intention to site some of the course within the McGill ESA. The City of Vaughan then placed a Holding Designation on the Open Space Zoning to permit the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement. The applicants produced a feasibility study. TRCA staff, after reviewing this report indicated that the proposal was not feasible. The most current application illustrates potential for significant impacts to the ESA. The McGill ESA is now designated as a Core Natural Area as recently defined under the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. The proposal is currently under detailed review by TRCA staff. Representatives of York Major Holdings Inc. have agreed to present the golf course proposal to the Don Watershed Regeneration Council for their information. The site is located on the west side of Dufferin Street, north of Major MacKenzie. The agenda item for December 13, 2001, which was subsequently cancelled, included the following draft resolution: "THAT the Policy and Advocacy Team review the materials available and provide comments on the proposals to City of Vaughan Councillors and staff; THAT copies of comments be provided to appropriate environmental groups within the City of Vaughan and adjacent areas; THAT the City of Vaughan be advised of the interest of the Don Council in this matter; AND FURTHER THAT the Don Council requests that the City of Vaughan advise Mark Wilson, Chair of the Don Council, of any upcoming meetings or opportunities to be involved in'the review of this application." For information contact: Adele Freeman, extension 5238 Date: December 7, 2001 toil F10 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 January 17, 2002 RES. #F7/02 - WEST DON COMMUNITY AND BUSINESS OUTREACH INITIATIVE Proposal to the Trillium Foundation Moved by: Seconded by: Helen Mills Peter Heinz THAT the Don Watershed Regeneration Council support the continuation of environmental stewardship initiatives within the Bartley Smith Greenway; AND FURTHER THAT the Don Watershed Regeneration Council support the funding application to the Ontario Trillium Foundation put forth by the Vaughan Chamber of Commerce in partnership with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, City of Vaughan and the Bartley Smith Greenway Steering Committee. CARRIED BACKGROUND In an effort to continue the successful community regeneration of the Bartley Smith Greenway, this project proposes to initiate an environmental stewardship program for businesses, residents, schools and other community organizations living and working adjacent to the Bartley Smith Greenway (BSG). In recent years there has been an increasing amount of interest and participation in planting events and habitat creation projects being implemented in the Bartley Smith Greenway. The West Don Community and Business Outreach Initiative will enable this momentum to continue and grow by actively seeking local schools, individual residents, interest groups and businesses to become involved in such activities in a joint effort to create healthy fish and wildlife habitat while at the same time enhancing the quality of life for those living and working within the surrounding area of the Bartley Smith Greenway. Various naturalization projects such as habitat enhancements and native species plantings achieved through the West Don Community and Business Outreach Initiative will be a long lasting tribute to the community's interest and hard work. The implementation of these projects combined with the reduction of industrial waste through clean -up events will create an aesthetically pleasing natural habitat which will support wildlife and be enjoyed by the community for years to come. Those who become involved with the Initiative will develop a sense of pride and ownership and will have satisfaction in knowing that they have made a positive contribution to their community. Volunteers and community members will have many opportunities to celebrate their accomplishments throughout the 5 year period including an environmental festival planned for the 5th year of the project. Project sites of the Initiative will be marked with signage to stand as a tribute to the community members and project partners responsible for creation of the naturalization project. As well, deserving businesses will be recognized for their participation in the Corporate Challenge Planting Program and garbage clean -up events and will also be encouraged to incorporate Best Management Practices (BMP's) into their daily operations. WMio January 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 F11 RATIONALE The rationale behind the West Don Community and Business Outreach Initiative is to enhance the ecological health of the West Don by continuing the naturalization and regeneration of the Bartley Smith Greenway through community involvement in environmental education and outreach initiatives. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding received from the Trillium Foundation will be used to hire a Project Coordinator who's job will be to organize and initiate the environmental stewardship program. Remaining funds from the Trillium Foundation will be put towards a variety of expenses such as plant material, brochures and pamphlets. Additional financial and in -kind support will be provided by the Vaughan Chamber of Commerce, TRCA, Bartley Smith Greenway Steering Committee, Landscape Planning Limited, Woodbridge Rotary Club and Glen Shields Public School. As part of the City of Vaughan's continuing support of the Bartley Smith Greenway project, Vaughan Council has been requested to support this application. Fundraising will continue over the 5 year period and additional sources of funding such as TD Friends of the Environment and Human Resources Development Canada will also be pursued. The total operating budget for the 5 year proposal is approximately $600,000. For information contact: Amy Thurston, ext.5283 or Adele Freeman, ext.5238 Date: January 10, 2001 RES. #F8/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: DRAFTLETTER TO TOWN OF MARKHAM REGARDING "PROTECTION OF SMALL WATERCOURSES AND STREAMS; REQUEST FOR COMMENTS" Deb Martin -Downs Don Cross THAT the following amendment be made to the wording of this letter; AND FURTHER THAT the with the amendment be approved and signed by Mark Wilson. AMENDMENT: From: 2. Those with a more defined valley form but typically ephemeral flows To: 2. Those with a more defined channel form but typically ephemeral flows F12 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1102 January 17, 2002 CARRIED January 11, 2002 LETTER WITH AMENDMENTS Ms. Lilli Duoba Manager of Environmental Planning and Rouge Park Town of Markham Development Services Commission 101 Town Centre Boulevard Markham, ON L3R 9W3 Dear Ms. Duoba: Re: Protection of Small Watercourses and Streams; Request for Comments Thank you for having taken this initiative to organize the public meeting on small watercourses in November of 2001. It is a topic that is long overdue for discussion. The Don Watershed Regeneration Council appreciates the opportunity to provide you with some comments for your consideration. Small watercourses in the Don Watershed have been treated rather poorly during development in the watershed. Whole watercourses were buried - including those that were permanently flowing, replacing them with sewer pipes which, to this day, deliver storm water directly to the main river without treatment or delay causing excessive flooding and erosion downstream, as well as water quality problems. Had we known then what we know now, we would have been much more cautious about dismissing the functions of these watercourses. There are four general kinds of conditions that occur in the headwater areas that need to be considered - • those with limited form and function (largely conveyance over land) • those with a more defined channel form but typically ephemeral flows • those with permanent flow and typically within a defined valley • those that have been degraded by past activities (e.g. burial, check dams, channelization, direct storm discharge) Each of these conditions contributes functionally to the watershed but before determining the fate of a given section of watercourse, it is important to understand the features, functions and linkages. We would state as a first principle that all defined watercourses (with permanent or intermittent flows) should be protected from alteration, but acknowledge that in some circumstances this is difficult to achieve. Sufficient technical and environmental evaluation needs to be undertaken to determine the tributaries to be protected and design requirements for those determined to be suitable for alteration. The objectives of any such decision should include environmental benefits for the stream system and for residents of the adjacent communities. Thus, an intermittent stream may have marginal value vis -a -vis water quality and quantity in the river but would have significant value when incorporated into a pedestrian and cycling greenway system and would still provide a basic drainage function. 1,3111Z January 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 F13 Planning for tributaries needs to be undertaken on a logical scale for whole stream systems and not on a development by development basis. This scale would facilitate decisions on existing streams and would also allow identification of opportunities to remove disconnects (eg. to create a defined Zink across an open field between an up welling area and an existing tributary) as well as areas suitable for landscape regeneration (buffers, greenway linkages). Ideally this would be undertaken through a subwatershed study conducted prior to development activity. Master drainage plans only focus on drainage engineering rather that on developing an understanding of the watershed. Hence, we would advocate that where development is proposed, subwatershed studies precede the development and include sufficient evaluation of the form and functions of the watercourse. The evaluation should also consider alternative treatments for the watercourse and weigh the environmental benefits of the proposals. Cost of the treatment should not be the only factor in determining the appropriate treatment for a watercourse. As we have found elsewhere in the Don watershed, the costs are substantial to retrofit or restore sections where cost was, no doubt, one of the only factors considered in the original selection of the treatment. Where development is proposed immediately adjacent to the watercourse, setbacks should be sufficient to include those factors that we do know, like flooding and meander belts, with some extra distance included as a precaution to buffer those things that we don't know today. Development in other parts of the Don, as well as other watersheds, has left us little room to regenerate or add storm water management where previously thought unnecessary, or resulted in floodlines that are too close for comfort. There are many sections of the Don which have already been altered by development. We would encourage the Town of Markham to include these areas, where appropriate, in the subwatershed studies, or through the development of policy for the treatment of such streams. Opportunities often present themselves for tradeoffs, cash in lieu, or during infrastructure renewal, which can result in benefits to these systems. We advocate subwatershed plans or master plans for such areas in order that the components of the rehabilitation can be defined and tackled piece by piece. Partners for specific projects can also be identified through this process. This could be similar to the Concept sites that were developed for Forty Steps to a New Don. We hope that these comments are helpful to the Town and thank you for the opportunity to contribute. Should you require further clarification, please contact Adele Freeman, Don Watershed Specialist at Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Yours truly Mark Wilson Chair Don Watershed Regeneration Council cc: Adele Freeman, TRCA wr'13 F14 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 January 17, 2002 RES. #F9/02 - REPORTS FROM TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: Lorna Krawchuk Helen Mills • THAT the draft minutes of meetings from the following Teams, including specific recommendations as noted, be received and endorsed: POLICY AND ADVOCACY TEAM MEETING - Minutes #3, November 29, 2001 PROJECTS AND STEWARDSHIP TEAM - Minutes #4, November 22, 2001 With the following amended sentence: The finished product will be in the form of a brochure including all watersheds within City boundaries. COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND EDUCATION - Minutes #1, December 6, 2001 Report prepared by: Jennifer Bamford, extension 5305 For Information contact: Adele Freeman, extension 5238 Date: January 10, 2001 UPDATES FROM OTHER DON WATERSHED ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS FODE Don Mills ratepayers unanimously opposed widening of Don Valley Parkway. BRING BACK THE DON TASK FORCE • New Don Valley Parkway sketches being done by City of Toronto to establish `no mow zones' • Task Force is getting more involved with daily operations of Brick Works • Monitoring and stewardship reports due beginning of March Some invasive species control test sites approved NORTH TORONTO GREEN COMMUNITY • Meeting on February 12 • Daylighting creek restoration , etc. on 12th agenda • Green Garden Visit program based on green communities concept wr 1`f January 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 F15 THORNHILL SCOUTS May 4 - Pomona Mills Park Environmental Day TORONTO BAY INITIATIVE • Summer Solstice Bus Tour - June 20 - 21st • April 20 - May 5: Festive Earth (TBI thinking of getting involved) STEWARDSHIP FORUM Kortright Centre for Conservation - February 16/02, 10 am - 2 pm A listing of events/ websites will be made available for Don Council members in the near future . RES. #F10 /02 - 2002 MEETING DATES FOR DON COUNCIL AND TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: Deb Martin -Downs Moyra Haney THAT the following meeting dates be approved; THAT the Watershed Council hold its meetings within the watershed whenever possible; AND FURTHER THAT meetings be held at various locations throughout the watershed. CARRIED DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL MEETING # DATE MEETING LOCH ICN 2/02 Thurs., FEBRUARY 21, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 3/02 Thurs., MARCH 21, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 4/02 Thurs., APRIL 18, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 5/02 Thurs., MAY 16, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 6/02 Thurs., JUNE 20, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 7/02 Thurs., JULY 18, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 8/02 Thurs., SEPTEMBER 19, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 9/02 Thurs., OCTOBER 17, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 10/02 Thurs., NOVEMBER 21, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 11/02 Thurs., DECEMBER 19, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED PROJECTS & STEWARDSHIP TEAM 01 IS F16 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #1/02 January 17, 2002 MEETING # DATE LOCATION,,, 2/02 Thurs. FEBRUARY 28, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 3/02 Thurs. MARCH 28, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 4/02 Thurs. APRIL.25, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 5/02 Thurs. MAY 30, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 6/02 Thurs. JUNE 27, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 7/02 Thurs. JULY 25, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED POLICY & ADVOCACY TEAM MEETING # DATE LOOAi7!QNt :; . �,; 2/02 Thurs. MARCH 7, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 3/02 Thurs. MAY 2, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 4/02 Thurs. JULY 4, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED EDUCATION & OUTREACH MEETING DATE LOCATION' , , I 1/02 Thurs. FEBRUARY 7, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 2/02 Thurs. APRIL 4, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 3/02 Thurs. JUNE 6, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED BACKGROUND The meeting schedule above has been designed for the fewest possible conflicts with Municipal Council meetings. Report prepared by: Jennifer Bamford, Extension 5305 For information contact: Adele Freeman, Extension 5238 Date: Jan. 10, 2002 ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:25 p.m., on January 17, 2002. Mark Wilson Chair /j b wpllo Craig Mather CAO; Secretary Treasurer TRCA ts. rerTHE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/02 February 21, 2002 Page F17 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #2/02, was held in Committee Room 1, at the North York Civic Centre, 5100 Yonge Street, in the City of Toronto, on Thursday, February 21, 2002. Mark Wilson, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT Margaret Buchinger Member Margaret Casey Vice -Chair Stephen Cockle Member Geoffrey Cook Member Don Cross Vice -Chair Paula Davies Member Phil Goodwin Member Moyra Haney Member Peter Heinz Member Deb Martin -Downs Member Helen Mills Member Roslyn Moore Member Douglas OBright Member Janice Palmer Alternate Member Councillor Jane Pitfield City of Toronto Member Mel Plewes Member Eduard Sousa Toronto Parks Staff Liaison Mark Wilson Chair STAFF Adele Freeman Don /Highland Watershed Specialist Jason Scott Planner, Development Services - TRCA Kathy Stranks Executive Assistant - TRCA Amy Thurston Don Watershed Technical Assistant Lisa Turnbull Team Facilitator - WMD, TRCA WMl7 F18 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/02 FEBRUARY 21, 2002 RES. #F11/02 - MINUTES OF MEETING #1/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Don Cross Mel Plewes THAT the minutes of Meeting #1102, held on January 17, 2002 be approved ... CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE 3.1 Correspondence from Tija Luste- Dirks, dated January 10, 2002 resigning from the Don Watershed Regeneration Council. 3.2 Correspondence copied to Mark Wilson, Chair of the Don Council from Lois Griffin, Chair of the Humber Alliance dated January 28, 2002 regarding "Designation of Road Salt as a Toxic Substance ". RES. #F12/02 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Janice Palmer Paula Davies THAT Tija Luste -Dirks be thanked for her hard work and dedication to the Don Council over the last 6 years; AND FURTHER THAT Correspondence Items 3.1 and 3.2 inclusive, be received. CARRIED. INFORMATION 4.1 Staff Report to Watershed Management Advisory Board Meeting #1/02, held on February 8, 2002, entitled "LOWER DON RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN STUDY; Appointment to Technical Advisory Committee ". 4.2 Staff Report to Watershed Management Advisory Board, Meeting #1/02, held on February 8, 2002, entitled "REGIONAL WATERSHED MONITORING PROGRAM: Summary of 2001 monitoring activities related to the TRCA's Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. 4.3 Staff Report to Watershed Management Advisory Board, Meeting #1/02, held on February 8, 2002, entitled "ENVIRONMENT CANADA'S DESIGNATION OF ROAD SALT AS A TOXIC SUBSTANCE ": Authority response to Environment Canada's wri J 8 February 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/02 F19 designation of road salt as a toxic substance. 4.4 Staff Report to Watershed Management Advisory Board, Meeting #1/02, held on February 8, 2002, entitled "STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION HANDBOOK: Completion of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Handbook. 4.5 City of Toronto Staff Report to the Planning and Transportation Committee dated January 8, 2002 entitled "Harmonized City -wide Ravine By -law ". 4.6 Adele Freeman reported to the Council that Marta Soucek has accepted a full -time position with the Ministry of the Environment. Amy Thurston will continue the position of Don Technical Assistant for the time - being. RES. #F13/02 - INFORMATION Moved by: Seconded by: Moyra Haney Deb Martin -Downs THAT Marta Soucek be thanked for her work as the Don Council Technical Assistant and congratulated on her new position as Policy Analyst with the Water Policy Branch of the Ministry of Environment; AND FURTHER THAT Information Items 4.1 to 4.6 inclusive be received CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF Mel Plewes declared a Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest with respect to the Oak Ridges Moraine discussion. Deborah Martin -Downs had a Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest with respect to the Vaughan Master Plan for MNR lands as it is part of the Maple Valley Plan. Mr. Plewes and Ms. Martin -Downs did not participate in these items. wni1 F20 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/02 FEBRUARY 21, 2002 POLICY ISSUES RES. #F14/02- CENTRAL ONTARIO STRATEGIC TRANSPORTATION DIRECTIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Buchinger Stephen Cockle THAT this item be referred to the Policy and Advocacy Team; AND FURTHER THAT copies of the comments be sent to the five Provincial Conservative candidates if appropriate. RES. #F15/02 - MCGILL ESA - Current Planning Issues Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Casey Roslyn Moore THAT the Don Council request that the McGill ESA study, undertaken in 2001 by TRCA staff, be released to members of the Don Council; THAT the Don Council form a sub - committee consisting of Roslyn Moore, Stephen Cockle and Margaret Casey to develop a case study on the cumulative impacts that have resulted, and may result, from further intrusions on the ESA; AND FURTHER THAT the Stewardship Outreach section of the TRCA be requested to attend the next Projects and Stewardship Team meeting to consider an outreach project for private land owners in the McGiII ESA. BACKGROUND Jason Scott, Planner - TRCA, attended the meeting to provide information on the Rizmi Aggregate application and the Region of York's initial proposal on the opening of the Teston Sideroad; two projects that may further impact the ecological integrity and function of the McGiII ESA. The Don Council discussed the potential for stewardship approaches with private owners in the area, and the need for assessing the cumulative impacts of existing adjacent and future land uses within the ESA. The following information needs were noted: 1. detailed field site assessment undertaken by staff but not yet completed 2. detailed map of ownership and current use and designations as per the Maple Valley Official Plan 3. further understanding of the planning context for the ESA wH iO February 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/02 F21 It was agreed that a sub - committee be formed to initiate the review of this work. RES. #F16/02- EAGLES NEST GOLF COURSE Moved by: Seconded by: Roslyn Moore Paula Davies THAT a follow -up letter be sent to all parties previously written to on this subject requesting that approvals for extension of the golf course into this cleared area, be denied; AND FURTHER THAT they be asked for support for replanting as well as appropriate compensation for additional regeneration and as a deterrent to future acts of wanton destruction. On February 21, 2002, following an investigation, the Region of York laid 432 separate charges under section 3 (a) of the Tree By -Law, which states that no person shall destroy a tree growing in a woodiot in a sensitive natural area. A further 432 charges were laid under section 3 (b) of the By -Law which states that no person shall destroy a tree growing in a woodiot, if the tree is a species listed in the By -Law. Each offence carries a maximum fine of not more than $20,000. The charges were laid against: York Major Holdings Inc.; Eagles Nest Golf Club Inc.; the Project co- ordinator and on -site supervisor for Eagle's Nest and logging firm involved. COMMITTEE REPORTS /UPDATES /PRESENTATIONS RES. #F17/02 - REPORTS FROM TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: Don Cross Paula Davies THAT the draft minutes of meetings from the following Teams, including specific recommendations as noted, be received and endorsed: PROJECTS AND STEWARDSHIP TEAM Minutes of Meeting #1/02 held January 31, 2002 (A)- Don Watershed Interpretative Signage (Peter Heinz) (B)- Critical Area Management tot 21 F22 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/02 FEBRUARY 21, 2002 A. SIGNAGE: Phil Goodwin presented some concepts resulting from the discussions at the Projects and Stewardship Team Meeting with respect to signs to identify the creeks and rivers in the watershed. It was agreed that it was preferable to name the Creek, leaving 'The Don" in a smaller size on the corner of the sign. The blue background with white letters was preferred. Locations for these signs would include both road crossings and within the valley system itself. The need to co- ordinate this with the efforts of the regional and local municipalities was noted. B. CRITICAL AREA MANAGEMENT There is a need to identify areas needing protection in a watershed. • Focus on prevention rather than regeneration; • Funds have been earmarked but the objectives need to be clarified. A Terms of Reference for the study is required prior to initiating any work. There is a need to work with municipal partners since they may already have inventories done In the process of developing a Terms of Reference the following will be considered: Scale of sites to be looked at; Council members to provide list of sites; Be specific when identifying problems at sites so people know exactly what the concern is; Amy Thurston will send the compiled listing of Council members' sites and concerns to all members; Private land stewardship is an issue. Roslyn Moore will work with staff and municipal representatives to develop a Terms of Reference for discussion. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH Minutes of Meeting #1/02 held February 7, 2002 POLICY AND ADVOCACY Minutes of Meeting #1/02 held January 24, 2002 DON EVENTS - UPDATE /REMINDER Paddle the Don May 5th: Comments wanted on Fundraising efforts Back Yard Habitat Campaign MI ZZ February 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/02 F23 Richmond Hill Splash! RES. #F18/02 - 2002 MEETING DATES FOR DON COUNCIL AND TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: Deb Martin -Downs Moyra Haney THAT the following meeting dates be approved; THAT the Watershed Council hold its meetings within the watershed whenever possible; AND FURTHER THAT meetings be held at various locations throughout the watershed. CARRIED DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL' MEETING # DATE MEETING' LOCATION 2 Thurs., MARCH 21, 2002 METRO HALL RM. 314 3 Thurs., APRIL 18, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 4 Thurs., MAY 16, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 4 5 Thurs., JUNE 20, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 (Room reserved from 6:30 pm) 6 Thurs., JULY 18, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 7 Thurs., SEPTEMBER 19, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 8 Thurs., OCTOBER 17, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 9 Thurs., NOVEMBER 21, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 10 Thurs., DECEMBER 19, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 101 2 3 F24 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/02 FEBRUARY 21, 2002 PROJECTS & STEWARDSHIP TEAM MEETING # 1 DATE LOCATION 2 Thurs. MARCH 28, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 3 Thurs. APRIL 25, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 4 Thurs. MAY 30, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 4 5 Thurs. JUNE 27, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 6 Thurs. JULY 25, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 4 POLICY & ADVOCACY TEAM MEETING # 1 DATE LOCATION, 2 Thurs. MARCH 7, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM.1 3 Thurs. MAY 2, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 4 Thurs. JULY 4, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 EDUCATION & OUTREACH MEETING # 1 PATE I • �. „SOGAT O . 44,-, 2 Thurs. APRIL 4, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 4 3 Thurs. JUNE 6, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 4 Report prepared by: Jennifer Bamford, Extension 5305 Date: March 13, 2002 NEW BUSINESS RES. #F19/02- UPDATES FROM OTHER DON WATERSHED GROUPS Motioned by: Seconded by: Janice Palmer Michael White THAT updates from other Don watershed groups be an ongoing item on all Don Council Agendas. February 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/02 F25 Task Force to Bring Back the Don Email lists of locations under bridges where homeless people are and it will be passed onto the City. INFORMATION UPDATES Margaret Casey, on behalf of the Don Council was deputized to the Waterfront Reference Group on February 20th in regards to the "Making Waves" document. Her submission is copied below. Deputation to Toronto Waterfront Reference Group February 20, 2002 RE: Feedback from Public Consultation Process "Making Waves: Principles for Building Toronto's Waterfront" (Central Waterfront Part II Plan) On behalf of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council, I am pleased to provide the following comments to you. I am Margaret Casey, co -Vice Chair of the Don Council. Some of our members have participated in previous public meetings on "Making Waves" but this presentation is our first verbal submission. The Don Council has a keen interest in the regeneration of the Toronto Waterfront, particularly those components-that impact the Don River and its watershed. We add our support to the general tone and direction of the "Making Waves" report. We have recently submitted written comments on it and ask that you request staff to include our submission in the public comments received to date. First I must say that we view clean and green as the environmental foundation of a successful recreational and tourist destination. We support all comments that strengthen the achievement of the third Core Principle. Green Space / Linkage / Public Accessibility We too laud the Plans enhancement of the existing waterfront park structure. Since our focus is the Don we are particularly interested in maximizing the green space around the mouth of the Don and creating green linkages in all directions from the river. These linkages must anticipate movement of wildlife such as coyotes that currently visit and inhabit other green spaces such as Tommy Thompson Park at the Spit as well as bicyclists, pedestrians and other recreational users. The functions and linkages envisioned for the Don Greenway need to be carefully understood and identified using current science and in light of the land uses changes that are proposed. F26 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/02 FEBRUARY 21, 2002 We all know that ecological linkages are an essential part of an environmental plan. Animals and people will need equal consideration to ensure that potential conflicts are minimized. This means that the width of the Don Greenway corridor must not be identified until its functions are determined. Along with many others we see a strong association between "revitalizing" and "greening ". We also agree that plazas and promenades, while valuable in their own right, are not substitutes for green space. Thus the Don Council adds its support for designating as much land as possible south of the Ship Channel as green space. It is also essential that the Central Waterfront Plan ensures that adequate land for the rejuvenation of the mouth of the Don be set aside. We envision that the new Don's mouth will include ecological and habitat functions for fish migration, fish spawning, bird nesting, etc. These functions must be integral to its design. The new mouth is not just what is left over after roads and flood control needs are addressed. This is the public's opportunity to correct an action that was taken almost a century ago. An important recreational destination The vision of a revitalized Toronto Waterfront as an important recreational destination for the current and future population of the GTA is very important. The waterfront together with the Toronto Islands can truly be our "green necklace" providing a major alternative to the flight from the city in summer and a destination all year round. This consistency to Smart Growth principles is essential. We suggest that lessons can be taken from the city of Vienna where various measures designed for recreational purposes as well as flood control have made their waterfront "the favourite destination for almost half the population of Vienna ". In a 1997 survey, the reasons given for this turnaround include "relaxation, appreciation of nature and good accessibility". In Vienna, sensitive areas are protected and available only for visual enjoyment while other accessible areas have a combination of green and cultural /commercial activities. Repeating this zonal approach in Toronto will bring people back to the lake. We add our support for detailed policies on storm water management; elimination of combined sewer overflows has been a key issue for the Don Council for many years. They must be eliminated if we are to achieve the vision of a clean green Don River and waterfront. The Don Council also urges you to ask staff to include as a "Big Move ", the implementation of the Wet Weather Flow strategies that are currently being developed. There must be sufficient land set aside to accommodate and money to implement these strategies. The Wet Weather Flow strategies should be assessed together with the implementation of the redesigned Gardner to reduce costs where infrastructure investments are necessary. Infrastructure renewal; green or otherwise; must be considered at all opportunities and built into them. Only with the inclusion of these strategies will we be assured of achieving the ecological cornerstone of clean water in the lake and a functional Don River Mouth. Thank you for this opportunity to address you on this vitally important initiative. We ask that the Wig Z (p February 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2/02 F27 Don Council be kept informed of future meetings and reports. We are a part of revitalizing Toronto's waterfront. Margaret Buchinger, on behalf of the Chair of the Don Council, wrote a second letter to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing in regards to the Provincial Policy Statement. recommending the prohibition of development or site alteration within an Environmentally Significant Area. Her letter is copied below. February 12, 2002 Mr. Ken Peterson Provincial Policy Statement Review Project Provincial Planning & Environmental Services Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 14t Floor, 777 Bay St. Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 Re: Further Submission of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council Dear Mr. Peterson: In the Don Watershed Regeneration Council's letter of October 12, 2001, forwarding detailed comments and recommendations for changes to the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), we requested the opportunity to continue to be involved as the review proceeds. An event has recently occurred in the headwaters of the Don watershed which highlights a major weakness in the current PPS and again underlines the need to tighten policies relating to significant environmental features and functions (already requested in the Oct. 12 submission). By way of background, the issue concerns the lands bordering the Keele Valley Landfill site. As part of the Maple Valley Secondary Plan which incorporates the closure of the landfill, a golf course use was approved in principle on the east and south sides bordered by Dufferin Street and Major Mackenzie Drive. Included in the Secondary Plan is the McGill Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) and Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI), recognized as a high quality hydrological source for the Don, as a home for regionally rare plant species and a high quality maple beech forest, (and the largest remaining mature forest in the Region). Applications for golf course approval submitted to the Region of York and Municipality of Vaughan included portions of five holes within the boundaries of the ESA/ANSI - subject to the results of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The EIS was undertaken by the golf course proponents, reviewed and deemed inadequate to support the EIS conclusions and then expanded to address agency concerns. In the interim, two further complications have arisen - one which recognizes a higher order of importance of the natural heritage of the area (designation as "Core Natural Area" under the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan) and the other which clearly exemplifies the ineffectiveness of the provincial intent under the PPS to protect the natural heritage (illegal cutting of approximately 4.3 ha. of mature forest in the ESA/ANSI in advance of any approvals). wrt 27 F28 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #2102 FEBRUARY 21, 2002 All this could have been avoided if the PPS prohibited development or site alteration within an Environmentally Significant Area. The PPS (Section 2.3 Natural Heritage) has endorsed a process (the EIS) that, by its very nature, is confrontational rather than purely scientific. The process becomes the hand maiden to serve vested interests rather than the impartial arbiter for the natural environment. Everything hinges on interpretation of the data and "professional opinion" regarding the impacts of the proposed development. Agency and Ministry professionals are thereby pitted against hired consultants with the strong possibility (particularly when the municipality is scrambling for revenue from any new development) that encroachment will be permitted which, in the longer term, may leave the feature or function vulnerable to degeneration. We are convinced that this was not the intent of the Natural Heritage policies and make the submission that if specific features and functions are sufficiently important and valuable to warrant a provincial interest that permanent protection (and no intrusion) must be part of that equation. Any lesser treatment can undermine the basis for designating provincial interest in the first place. Therefore, we strongly urge that the PPS be amended to prohibit development and site alteration in all Environmentally Significant Areas. The requirement for flexibility that is needed to address natural changes over time should be the mandate of the environmental agencies and not left to the whims of the development approval process. We also submit that two further modifications are required to ensure effective implementation of this recommended change. The first is to expand the definition of "site alteration" in the PPS to include not only "fill, grading and excavation" but also destruction of trees (other than good forestry practices under the Trees Act) and removal of vegetation (which is presently captured only if there is fill, grading or excavation). The second is to clarify the definition of "significant" so that all environmentally significant features and functions are covered regardless of whether they are identified by the Municipality, the Region or the Province. In conclusion, the Don Council is very concerned about the continuing destruction of the natural heritage and submits that the Council's recommended changes to the PPS will greatly assist in providing the required level of protection by eliminating long term, negative impacts of development or site alteration within the boundaries of significant natural features. Yours truly, Original letter signed by: Mark Wilson Chair Don Watershed Regeneration Council Don Cross attended the "Simply H2O: Who Owns it: Who Can You Trust ?" workshop at Trent University. Simply Water? Who Owns It. Can You Trust It. Is There Enough. A workshop Presented by the 10th Annual David Shepard Family Lecture Series at Trent University, February 18 -20, 2002 Water is a simple necessity: for life, food production, industry and recreation. It is also the source of ever more conflict and uncertainty. Claims being staked out now by those who define water as a commodity to be bought and sold, and by those who seek to protect it hint at future conflicts over its ownership. Conflicting uses and demands will only increase in the absence of clear policies. A growing population, economic globalization, persistent contaminants and impending climate change mean that we may not be able to trust in abundant supplies of clean, fresh water. The Shepard Family Workshop focused on issues of ownership, quality and abundance of water resources. Drawing on expertise from across North America, the workshop was an opportunity for participants to articulate what Canadian water policies could or should be. Throughout the workshop, plenaries and concurrent sessions explored three areas of inquiry which are shaping current debates: 2. Ownership: Should water be considered a commodity, like other resources? 4. Trust: Can we be confident in the quality of our water? 6. Abundance: Will there be enough water to meet all species needs, in Canada and elsewhere? A summary will be available shortly on their website: http: / /www.trentu.ca /wsc. Eduard Sousa updated the Council on: • Discussions at the City of Toronto about extricating Water & Wastewater from the City and making it a PUC or Ontario Hydro responsibility. • Report coming to the City of Toronto Council from the CAO in June. Suggests the Don Council has someone come to speak at the next meeting. Sustainability Network Monte Humell from World Wildlife Fund Canada will be speaking on February 27 - 7:30 - 9:00 am, Central YMCA Auditorium, 20 Grosvenor Street, Toronto Partnership for Sustainability April 8 & 9 - Sheraton Centre, Toronto ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:25 p.m., on February 21, 2002. Mark Wilson Chair /j b wn Z`1 Craig Mather CAO; Secretary Treasurer TRCA THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/02 March 21, 2002 Page F30 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #3102, was held in Room 314, at Metro Hall, 55 John Street, in the City of Toronto, on Thursday, March 21, 2002. Mark Wilson, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT Margaret Buchinger Member Margaret Casey Vice -Chair Geoffrey Cook Member Don Cross Vice -Chair Paula Davies Member Laurian Farrell Member Phil Goodwin Member Moyra Haney Member Peter Heinz Member Deb Martin -Downs Member Helen Mills Member Roslyn Moore Member Dick O'Brien Member /Chair - TRCA Douglas Obright Member Janice Palmer Alternate Member Mel Plewes Member Councillor Erin Shapero Member Eduard Sousa Toronto Parks Staff Liaison Mark Wilson Chair STAFF Adele Freeman Amy Thurston Lisa Turnbull Don /Highland Watershed Specialist Don Watershed Technical Assistant Team Facilitator - WMD, TRCA GUEST Francis Cadeau Past Don Council Member Councillor Irene Jones City of Toronto Deborah Hardy Executive Assistant to Councillor Irene Jones pr13'0 March 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3102 F31 RES. #F20/02 - MINUTES OF MEETING #2/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Don Cross Margaret Casey THAT the minutes of Meeting #2/02, held on February 21, 2002 be approved .. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE 3.1 Letter to The Honourable David Anderson, Minister of the Environment from Mel Plewes, Chair of the Policy and Advocacy Committee; dated February 26, 2002 regarding the designation of road salt as a toxic substance. 3.2 Letter to Mark Wilson, Chair; from Michael DeAngelis, Commissioner of Planning, City of Vaughan dated February 28, 2002 regarding York Major Holdings Inc. /Eagles Nest Golf Course - Tree Cutting; Maple Valley Plan (OPA #535) 3.3 Letter to Mark Wilson, Chair; from Roselyne Cossette of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing; in reply to our letter of February 11, 2002 regarding York Major Holdings Inc. /Eagles Nest Golf Course. 3.4 Letter to Mark Wilson, Chair dated February 28, 2002; from Dan Newman, MPP in regards to our correspondence dated February 11, 2002 3.5 Letter to Mark Wilson, Chair dated February 28, 2002; from Dan Newman, MPP in regards to our correspondence dated February 18, 2002 3.6 Letter to Mark Wilson, Chair dated March 12, 2002 from Charlie Lauer, Acting Assistant Deputy Minister, Ministry of Natural Resources regarding the Stewardship Ranger Program RES. #F21/02 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Buchinger Peter Heinz THAT Correspondence Items 3.1 to 3.6 inclusive, be received. CARRIED. 191131 F32 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/02 MARCH 21, 2002 INFORMATION 4.1 5th Annual Corporate Planting Challenge to restore Langstaff EcoPark; Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4.2 Staff Report to Authority Meeting #3/02 to be held on March 22, 2002; entitled "Eagle's Nest Golf Course" RES. #F22/02 - INFORMATION Moved by: Mel Plewes Seconded by: Roslyn Moore THAT Information Items 4.1 and 4.2 inclusive be received CARRIED. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest. PRESENTATIONS RES. #F23/02 - WATER GOVERNANCE Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Buchinger Peter Heinz THAT Councillor Irene Jones be thanked for her presentation on Water Governance; THAT a sub -team be formed consisting of Don Cross, Mel Plewes, Deb Martin- Downs, Laurian Farrell, Doug OBright, Eduard Sousa and Margaret Buchinger; THAT a meeting be setup inviting members of the Humber Alliance, Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force, the Rouge Park Alliance and the Waterfront to discuss Water Governance; THAT a letter be sent to Don watershed Councillors outside of the City of Toronto informing them of the Study; Li 13Z March 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/02 F33 AND FURTHER THAT members of the Don Council attend one of the four Open House Sessions CARRIED. Councillor Irene Jones of the City of Toronto spoke to the Don Council on the Water & Wastewater Utility Study. In November 2001, Toronto Council directed the City's Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) to conduct a study on public sector governance options for water and wastewater services currently managed by the Works and Emergency Services department. It was agreed that Watershed Committees should be submitting their comments and may wish to express the need for further public consultation on this issue. Councillor Erin Shapero said that the `905' Councillors were not aware of these workshops and this study. As this is a bigger issue than just city -wide, it was suggested that letters be written informing the GTA councillors of the study and Open Houses. It was brought to the attention of the Don Council, that the Canada Water & Wastewater Association web side (www.cwwa.ca) states "The City of Toronto in its Vision states it wants its utilities to be public by 2004 ". The report on governance options will be going to City of Toronto Council in June. Members are asked to attend one of the following Open Houses listed below: OPEN HOUSES DATE LOCATION TIME Tuesday, April 2, 2002 Metro Hall 55 John Street Room 308 & 309 4 to 9 p.m. Thursday, April 4, 2002 Scarborough Civic Centre 150 Borough Drive Committee Room 1 & 2 4 to 9 pm Wednesday, April 10, 2002 North York Civic Centre 5100 Yonge Street Council Chambers & Foyer 4 to 9 pm Saturday, April 13, 2002 Etobicoke Civic Centre 399 The West Mall Council Chambers & Foyer 4 to 9 pm wr(33 F34 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/02 MARCH 21, 2002 POLICY ISSUES RES. #F24/02- PROGRESS UPDATE FOR DISCUSSION PAPER - WET WEATHER FLOW MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN Moved by: Seconded by: Kevin Mercer Paula Davies THAT a sub - committee be formed to comment on the Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan; AND FURTHER THAT Margaret Buchinger draft a comment paper on the Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan. CARRIED. Members of the sub - committee should refer to the objectives and goals in the Report Card and relate it to the Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan. The Council needs to make clear the priorities that we support - i.e., treatment train approach. RES. #F25/02 - EAGLE'S NEST GOLF COURSE Moved by: Seconded by: Don Cross Kevin Mercer THAT the Don Watershed Regeneration Council supports the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) staff recommendations with respect to the relocation of the proposed tees, fairways and greens originally proposed within the McGill ESA/ANSI to an area outside of the ESA; THAT all damage within the ESA must be appropriately restored; THAT the City of Vaughan be requested to require additional restoration compensation in recognition of the decades that will be required for this Oak Ridges Moraine Natural Core Area to regain the level of natural function afforded by the mature state that has been lost including but not limited to: soil structure; forest flora; wildlife habitat and breeding sites; THAT the Chair and solicitor for the Region of York be so informed of this request in light of the current charges that have been laid relating to the clearing /grading within the McGill ESA/ANSI; THAT the Chair of the Don Council attend the TRCA's Authority meeting on March 22, 2002, in support of the staff recommendations and to advise of the Don Council's request for additional compensation; wh31 March 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/02 F35 AND FURTHER THAT a representative of the Don Council attend the City of Vaughan, Committee Meeting of the Whole at which time the Holding provision of the Site Plan will be discussed and present this resolution. CARRIED. BACKGROUND The TRCA staff comments and recommendations to be considered by the TRCA on Friday, March 22, 2002, were provided for the information of the Don Council. The proposed resolution was: "WHEREAS the City of Vaughan had placed a "Holding" symbol on the by -law which allows conditional approval for golf course uses within a portion of Environmentally Significant lands known as the McGill ESA /ANSI, which has also been designated as a Natural Core Area within the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan; WHEREAS provisions of Official Plan Amendment 535 allow for golf course uses within a portion of the ESA /ANSI lands, subject to the demonstration that any such uses would not result in negative impacts to the ecological features and functions of the ESA /ANSI lands; WHEREAS the proponent of the Eagle's Nest Golf Course has provided Environmental Impact Statements with respect to the potential impacts of the location of portions of the golf course within the ESA /ANSI lands; WHEREAS following the review of the Environmental Impact Studies submitted in support of the application, it is the continuing opinion of staff that negative impacts will occur based on the removal of forest and vegetation cover; WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff review findings have advised that location of a portion of the golf course within the ESA /ANSI lands is contrary to TRCA policies on uses within ESA designated areas; WHEREAS approximately 4.3 ha of forest area within the ESA has been cleared in advance of the appropriate planning approvals and the completion of agency review; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the Authority confirms the opinion of TRCA staff that, while the majority of the subject lands outside the ESA /ANSI lands are suitable for golf course use, the Authority does not support the siting of any golf course facilities within the boundaries of the ANSI /ESA as it will result in the loss of ecological features and functions of the ESA; THAT, notwithstanding the clearing that has already occurred, the City of Vaughan be requested to direct the proponents to revise the Site Plan application to remove all proposed tees, fairways and greens now proposed within the ESA /ANSI lands, and to seek appropriate restoration of all damaged areas; AND FURTHER THAT the Chair and solicitor of the Region of York; the Regional Director, Central Region, Ministry of Natural Resources; the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services, City of Toronto; and the Chair of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council; be so advised." F36 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/02 MARCH 21, 2002 For information contact: Adele Freeman, extension 5238 Date: March 21, 2002 RES. #F26/02- YORK REGION TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Moved by: Seconded by: Doug Obright Mel Plewes THAT a section be added to the draft report regarding better urban design. ... CARRIED. The draft response was discussed and minor revisions suggested, including an additional comment to be added regarding urban design. Margaret Buchinger will finalize comments. RES. #F27/02 - FORMAT OF THE "ON THE DON" NEWSLETTER Moved by: Seconded by: Deb Martin -Downs Roslyn Moore THAT the "On the Don" newsletter change the format to tabloid style and change the paper stock to take advantage of the savings In printing costs. CARRIED. The company printing both the Humber and the Etobicoke - Mimico watershed newsletters has offered a good price for printing all three newsletters. RES. #F28/02 - JESSAMYN HOLDINGS LIMITED Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Casey Kevin Mercer THAT the Don Council write a letter to Tina Molinari, MPP (THORNHILL) requesting the province form a funding partnership with the Town of Markham for the purchase of the Jessamyn Holdings Limited property; AND FURTHER THAT Don Cross depute on behalf of the Don Council, in support of the acquisition of the land at the Town of Markham Council meeting being held on March 26, 2002. lti36 March 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/02 F37 DISCUSSION Councillor Erin Shapero, Town of Markham spoke on the current issue regarding the Jessamyn Holdings Limited property. The Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) has approved 6 lots to be developed by Jessamyn Holdings Limited. The community is very opposed to this development as this property has been thought of as a part of Settlers Park for a number of years. Improvements to the property, including a trail and various plantings by the community, ratepayers associations and boy scouts have occurred in the recent past. Markham residents have offered to contribute towards the land purchase and have set up a fund. It was suggested that the German Mills Ratepayers Association request funding through the TD Friends of the Environment Foundation. Councillor Shapero indicated that this piece of land is part of a 65 acre area in the German Mills Creek sub - watershed. The Town of Markham has less than 2% of forest left. BACKGROUND The Don Council at Meeting #7/00, held on September 21, 2000 passed Resolution #F71/00: "AND FURTHER THAT the Vice -Chair of the Don Council write to the Town of Markham requesting that the Town make every effort to acquire this parcel of land adjacent to Settler's Park recognizing the strong community interest in continuing the use of this area as a buffer to the valley and for public use." The Authority's Executive Committee at Meeting 8/00, held on September 15, 2000 passed Resolution #B129/00: "THAT staff be directed to commence preliminary negotiations and explore possible partnerships for funding for the potential acquisition of the Jessamyn Holdings Limited property located at 80 German Mills Road in the Town of Markham; AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Executive Committee at a future date." The subject property was acquired by Jessamyn Holdings Limited on October 3, 1979. The German Mills Ratepayers Association have indicated that the community believed until recently that the subject property was part of Settlers Park owned by the Town. The property has been used as parkland by the community for nearly thirty years. In 1986 the Town of Markham developed a Master Park Plan to guide the potential future creation of Settlers Park. The subject property was included within the park boundary. While the formal development of Settlers Park has not yet occurred, certain small initiatives have taken place. In 1994, the Thornhill Boy Scouts officially adopted the park and in 1998 planted saplings adjacent to and on the north end of the subject property. In 1997, the Authority in partnership with the Town, constructed a pathway across the subject property to provide better access for the residents. F38 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/02 MARCH 21, 2002 COMMITTEE REPORTS /UPDATES /PRESENTATIONS RES. #F29/02 - REPORTS FROM TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Casey Moyra Haney THAT the draft minutes of meetings from the following Teams, including specific recommendations as noted, be received and endorsed: AND FURTHER THAT the draft letter to Mayor Mel Lastman regarding "Media Reports on a Feasibility Study of the Widening of the Don Valley Parkway" be finalized and sent. 8.1 POLICY AND ADVOCACY a) Minutes of Meeting #2/02 held March 7, 2002 b) Draft Letter to Mayor Mel Lastman regarding "Media Reports on a Feasibility Study of the Widening of the Don Valley Parkway ". The above noted letter to Mayor Lastman was accepted and is to be sent as soon as possible. Mel Plewes suggested that other Watershed Groups be invited to the provincial transportation strategy meeting being set up. Gary Wilkins has already responded to Adele stating that members of the Humber Alliance will be attending. 8.2 PROJECTS AND STEWARDSHIP TEAM a) Minutes of Meeting #2/02 held on February 28, 2002 There was a recommendation to cancel the meeting for next week. Peter spoke on the meeting with Toronto Parks. The Team's dream is to get people out walking in the watershed and would like to see the Parks and Recreation department come on board to do a walking program as this would be a great opportunity for stewardship. There is a wish to dissipate the fear people have of walking through the valleys. Levels of signage were discussed: 1. Awareness 2. Way finding 3. Regulations /info 4. Deeper Interpretation level Suggestions were made to the Parks & Rec. Department. March 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/02 F39 ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES RES. #F30/02 - 2002 MEETING DATES FOR DON COUNCIL AND TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: Moyra Haney Margaret Casey THAT the following meeting dates be approved; THAT the Watershed Council hold its meetings within the watershed whenever possible; AND FURTHER THAT meetings be held at various locations throughout the watershed. CARRIED DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL MEETING # DATE MEETING LOCATION 3 Thurs., APRIL 18, 2002 ROOM TBA METRO HALL 4 Thurs., MAY 16, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 4 5 Thurs., JUNE 20, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 (Room reserved from 6:30 pm) 6 Thurs., JULY 18, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 7 Thurs., SEPTEMBER 19, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 8 Thurs., OCTOBER 17, 2002 TO BE ANNOUNCED 9 Thurs., NOVEMBER 21, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 10 Thurs., DECEMBER 19, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 G4ti39 F40 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/02 MARCH 21, 2002 PROJECTS & STEWARDSHIP TEAM MEETING # DATE 1 LOCATION 3 Thurs. APRIL 25, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 4 Thurs. MAY 30, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 4 5 Thurs. JUNE 27, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 6 Thurs. JULY 25, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 4 POLICY & ADVOCACY TEAM MEETING # DATE 1 LOCATION 3 Thurs. MAY 2, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 4 Thurs. JULY 4, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 EDUCATION & OUTREACH MEETING # DATE LOCATION 2 Thurs. APRIL 4, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 4 3 Thurs. JUNE 6, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 4 Report prepared by: Jennifer Bamford, Extension 5305 Date: March 13, 2002 UPDATES FROM OTHER DON WATERSHED /ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS Sustainability Network Forum Moyra Haney shared the following information: A SPRING BAROMETER: PERSPECTIVES ON THE ENVIRONMENT WITH STIEN LAL, FM MORRISON AND ERIC WHAN Featured panelists: FM Morrison, Executive Producer, CBC Disclosure, on media Eric Whan, Environics, on public opinion March 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #3/02 F41 Stien Lal, ex- Deputy Minister, Ontario MOE , on government You'll have the opportunity to hear from each panelist as well as participate in an extended question and answer period. March 28, 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM Room 308 -309, Toronto Metro Hall (King and John) $10 at the door Toronto Field Naturalists Peter told the Council that the TFN's April newsletter (TFN 507) contains an excerpt of the news article written by Gail Sawinson, The Toronto Star, February 27, 2002 regarding the tree cutting on the Eagles Nest Golf Course. Riversides Kevin Mercer spoke on the launch of the "Take Me Out to the Car Wash ". The campaign aims to educate householders and businesses on issues of driveway and parking lot car washing; discharging of pollutants to storm systems which feed into lakes. They are working with Environment Canada to implement certification for car washes. Project is called: "River Safe Car Wash Camp ". Friends of the Don East Paula Davies said the FODE newsletters are now available. NEW BUSINESS ROAD SALTS Kevin Mercer Environment Canada is invoking the priority sub -list on road salts. It was approved by Cabinet, There is a 2 year consultation process. Council is encouraged to send comments to Ontario Environmental Network to expresswhethertheywould like to be involved in National Consultations. There are 35 seats across Canada. Riversides is lobbying for 1/3 of the seats to be held by environmental interest groups rather than the few they have proposed. It is expected that 4 -5 seats will be held by industry and Transportation Departments will hold 2/3 of the seats. Mel Plewes Dick O'Brien should suggest to Conservation Ontario that they be involved in the consultations as a working group member, and that the Don Council become a corresponding member of the group. MAPLE VALLEY Adele: There was a site walk in Maple Valley (former MNR lands) regarding future management and development of the site. There will be a public consultation process and there will be an opportunity for members of the Don Council to contribute ideas about the management of the site. OTHER ITEMS Amy Thurston • Reminder that the "Healthy Yard" seminar will be held on March 27 at the Brick Works from 7 -9 pm. • Amy has put up a map for members to indicate where they wish to locate the Don signage. • Volunteer sign -up sheets for the "Paddle the Don" and "Mill Pond Splash" are being circulated. ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:35 p.m., on March 21, 2002. Mark Wilson Chair /jb Craig Mather CAO; Secretary Treasurer TRCA THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #4/02 April 18, 2002 Page F43 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #4/02, was held in Room 314, at Metro Hall, 55 John Street, in the City of Toronto, on Thursday, April 18, 2002. Mark Wilson, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT Margaret Buchinger Member Karen Boniface Staff Liaison, Markham Margaret Casey Vice -Chair Don Cross Vice -Chair Paula Davies Member Phil Goodwin Member Peter Heinz Member Deb Martin -Downs Member Kevin Mercer Member Helen Mills Member Douglas Obright Member Janice Palmer Alternate Member Mel Plewes Member Erin Shapero Member Mark Wilson Chair STAFF Adele Freeman Don /Highland Watershed Specialist Amy Thurston Don Watershed Technical Assistant GUEST Michael Bain RES. #F31/02 - MINUTES OF MEETING #3/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Don Cross Margaret Buchinger Resident THAT the minutes of Meeting #3/02, held on March 21, 2002 be approved .... CARRIED. F44 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #4/02 APRIL 18, 2002 CORRESPONDENCE 3.1 Letter to Mark Wilson, Chair dated April 10, 2002 from Bill Fisch, Regional Chair and CEO, Regional Municipality of York regarding the Eagle's Nest Golf Course 3.2 Letter to Mark Wilson, Chair, dated April 2, 2002 from David Caplan, MPP, regarding Rizmi Holdings Aggregate Licence Applications. 3.3 Letter to Kathy Stranks, EA to Chair and CAO of TRCA, dated March 15, 2002, from David Anderson, Minister of the Environment regarding the draft Canada - Ontario Agreement 3.4 Letter from Mark Wilson to John Leach, City Clerk, City of Vaughan dated April 11, 2002 regarding Committee of the Whole, Meeting Date April 8, 2002; Agenda Item 26.1 - Eagles Nest Golf Course" Discussion Item 3.4 Margaret Casey represented the Don Council at the City of Vaughan Committee of the Whole meeting, held on April 8, 2002. Two items were being discussed: the Eagles Nest Golf Course site plan and lifting the Hold on the area that was cut. The developer was in attendance. RES. #F32/02 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Casey Mel Plewes THAT Correspondence Items 3.1 to 3.4 inclusive, be received CARRIED AMENDMENT RES. #F33/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: Don Cross Margaret Buchinger THAT Margaret Casey draft a letter for Mark Wilson's signature advising Councillor Di Vona that the Don Council is in support of the Vaughan Landfill closure and that the community had recognized this. CARRIED APRIL 18, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #4/02 F45 INFORMATION 4.1 News Release from the Ministry of the Environment dated April 11, 2002 regarding "Ontario Investing $50 million to Clean Up the Great Lakes" 4.2 Community Planting Events Spring 2002 List, City of Toronto; dated received April 9, 2002 4.3 Natural Environment News 2001; Volume 1, Issue 1; February 2002 4.4 North Toronto Green Community Clean -up Event flyer 4.5 Staff Report to the Watershed Management Advisory Board, Meeting #2/02, April 12, 2002 entitled "Protection and Management of Small Streams and Intermittent Watercourses" 4.6 Staff Report to the Watershed Management Advisory Board, Meeting #2/02, April 12, 2002 entitled " Establishment of an Inter - regional Working Group on Stormwater Management" 4.7 Staff Report to the Watershed Management Advisory Board, Meeting #2/02, April 12, 2002 entitled "Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan" 4.8 Staff Report to the Watershed Management Advisory Board, Meeting #2/02, April 12, 2002 entitled "the York Region Natural Heritage Management Project 2002 - 2006" 4.9 Staff Report to the Watershed Management Advisory Board, Meeting #2/02, April 12, 2002 entitled "Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program" 4.10 Staff Report to the Watershed Management Advisory Board, Meeting #2/02, April 12, 2002 entitled "Ministry of Natural Resources Stream Gauge Funding" RES. #F34/02 - INFORMATION Moved by: Seconded by: Peter Heinz Kevin Mercer THAT Information Items 4.1 to 4.10 inclusive be received CARRIED. AMENDMENT RES. #F35/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: Mel Plewes Helen Mills THAT a letter be drafted to The Honourable Ernie Eves, Premier of Ontario and the Honourable Chris Stockwell, Minister of the Environment thanking him for the investment of $50 million dollars to clean up the Great Lakes. F46 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #4/02 APRIL 18, 2002 AND FURTHER THAT the Minister of the Environment be sent a copy of "Bold Steps" and be requested to ensure that funds are set aside for protection and remedial action in the Toronto Area of Concern.. CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF There was no disclosures of pecuniary interest. PRESENTATIONS Suggestions for Future Presentations 1. A staff member from the Region of York's "Greening Strategy" 2. Scott Jarvie, TRCA, "Regional Monitoring Program" 3. Gary Bowen, "Duffins and Carruthers SOW" POLICY ISSUES RES. #F36/02 - WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY STUDY Moved by: Seconded by: Peter Heinz Margaret Casey THAT the draft comments, prepared by the Don Regeneration Council and the Humber Watershed Alliance and Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force, be finalized by staff based on any revisions provided by the Don Regeneration Council, Humber Watershed Alliance and Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force, and be submitted to the City of Toronto's Chief Administrative Officer for consideration in their Water and Wastewater Utility Study; AND FURTHER THAT the Don Watershed Councillors, outside the City of Toronto, be circulated the joint comments of the Don Regeneration Council, the Humber Watershed Alliance and the Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force regarding the Water and Wastewater Utility Study in the City of Toronto, for their information. Report prepared by: Adele Freeman, extension 5238 Date: April 18, 2002 WML16 APRIL 18, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #4/02 F47 ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES RES. #F37/02 - MEETING DATES FOR DON COUNCIL AND TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret 'Casey Douglas Obright THAT the following meeting dates be approved; THAT the Watershed Council hold its meetings within the watershed whenever possible; AND FURTHER THAT meetings be held at various locations throughout the watershed. DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL MEETING # DATE MEETING LOCATION 5/02 Thurs., MAY 16, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 4 6/02 Thurs., JUNE 20, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 (AFTER 6.30PM) 7/02 Thurs., JULY 18, 2002 DEB MARTIN -DOWNS HOME 8/02 Thurs., SEPTEMBER 19, 2002 ST. PAUL'S ANGLICAN CHURCH 9/02 Thurs., OCTOBER 17, 2002 ST. PAUL'S ANGLICAN CHURCH 10/02 Thurs., NOVEMBER 21, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 11/02 Thurs., DECEMBER 19, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM 1 PROJECTS & STEWARDSHIP TEAM MEETING # DATE LOCATION 5/02 Thurs. MAY 30, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA 6/02 Thurs. JUNE 27, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA 7/02 Thurs. JULY 25, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA 8/02 Thurs, SEPT. 26, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA 9/02 Thurs. OCT. 24, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA 10/02 Thurs. NOV 28, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA w►i97 F48 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #4/02 APRIL 18, 2002 POLICY & ADVOCACY TEAM MEETING # I DATE " LQcATION, a 4/02 Thurs. JULY 4, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA 5/02 Thurs. SEPT. 12, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA 6/02 Thurs. OCT. 10, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA 7/02 Thurs. NOV. 14, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA EDUCATION & OUTREACH MEETING DATE ,.,I >Q.CATION 3/02 Thurs. JUNE 6, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA 4/02 Thurs. SEPT. 5, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA 5/02 Thurs. NOV. 7, 2002 NYCC ROOM TBA Report prepared by: Jennifer Bamford, Extension 5305 For information contact: Adele Freeman, Extension 5238 Date: May 7, 2002 COMMITTEE REPORTS /UPDATES /PRESENTATIONS RES. #F38/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: Peter Heinz Mel Plewes THAT the draft minutes of meetings from the following teams, including specific recommendations as noted, be received and endorsed: EDUCATION AND OUTREACH MEETING • Minutes of Meeting #2/02 held on April 4, 2002 PROJECTS AND STEWARDSHIP TEAM • Update Report prepared by: Jennifer Bamford, extension 5305 Date: April 11, 2002 1„I Llg APRIL 18, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #4102 F49 UPDATES FROM OTHER DON WATERSHED /ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS Task Force to Bring Back the Don Friends of the Don East Terraview Willowfield Richmond Hill Naturalists North Toronto Green Community Riversides Pomona Mills Conservationists ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9.30 p.m., on April 18, 2002 Mark Wilson Chair /jb J Craig Mather CAO; Secretary Treasurer TRCA THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #5/02 May 16, 2002 Page F50 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #5/02, was held in Committee Room 4, at the North York Civic Centre, 5100 Yonge Street, in the City of Toronto, on Thursday, May 16, 2002. Mark Wilson, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT Barbara Anderson Member Margaret Buchinger Member Stephen Cockle Member Geoff Cook Member Paula Davies Member Laurian Farrell Member Phil Goodwin Member Moyra Haney Member Peter Heinz Member Lorna Krawchuk Member Deb Martin -Downs Member Roslyn ,Moore Member Douglas Obright Member Janice Palmer Alternate Member Eduard Sousa Member Tanny Wells Member Michael White Member Mark Wilson Chair STAFF Adele Freeman Don /Highland Watershed Specialist Amy Thurston Don Watershed Technical Assistant RES. #F39/02 - MINUTES OF MEETING #4/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Janice Palmer Michael White THAT the minutes of Meeting #4/02, held on April 16, 2002 be approved CARRIED. MAY 16, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #5/02 F51 CORRESPONDENCE 3.1 Letter to Mark Wilson, Chair dated received May 3, 2002 from Mayor Mel Lastman, City of Toronto RES. #F40/02 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Peter Heinz Janice Palmer THAT Correspondence Item 3.1 be received. CARRIED INFORMATION 4.1 Media Release from Region of York dated May 6, 2002 entitled "Two Companies Plead Guilty to Charges of Violating York Region Tree Bylaw" 4.2 Staff Report to the Executive Committee Meeting #4/02, entitled "The Sustainable Water and Sewage Systems Act 2001, Bill 155 and the City of Toronto's Water and Wastewater Utility Study" RES. #F41/02 - INFORMATION Moved by: Janice Palmer Seconded by: Peter Heinz 2 -3 4 -5 THAT Information Items 4.1 and 4.2 inclusive, be received CARRIED. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF Deb Martin -Downs made a declaration of pecuniary interest in regards to the MOE Groundwater Presentation and did not vote on this item. F52 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #5102 MAY 16, 2002 PRESENTATIONS REGIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM The program is in its second year. The Authority is in a long -term partnership with the Region's within the Authority's jurisdiction and looking forr other partnership opportunities.. The monitoring is done at a subwatershed and watershed level not site specific. CEW is working closely with Scott Jarvie to harmonize the protocol and with data sharing. There will be a Forum on Benthic Macro Invertebrate data on June 1st at Innes College. The CEW web address will be e- mailed to members. MOE GROUNDWATER INITIATIVES The province has announced a 6 million dollar investment over 3 years. Network of 400 monitoring wells in 38 watersheds - data on levels and basic water quality. Managing water taking - promote long term sustainability - manage on a watershed basis. POLICY ISSUES CITY OF TORONTO WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY STUDY A joint letter was sent to the Public Consultation and Community Outreach with the comments of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council and the Humber Watershed Alliance. Margaret Casey attended a small working group meeting, Don Cross is attending one tonight. There will be a joint Policy & Finance and Works Committees meeting taking place on June 11 -12, 2002. Members of the public who wish to make a deputation should contact Trudy Perrin in the City Clerk's Office at 416 - 392 -8027 RES. #F /02 - Moved by: Seconded by: THAT two or three representatives of the Don Council should attend the joint Policy & Finance and Works Committees meeting; Wt152 MAY 16, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #5/02 F53 AND FURTHER THAT these representatives should review the paper on this and report back 1 week before June 11 meeting. 7.2 EAGLE'S NEST GOLF COURSE The cleared area is still being used as part of the golf course. There is a need for new provincial legislation, other than the Trees Bylaw to deal with these issues, including economic tools that would put a value on the destroyed lands - ie., habitat loss, wood production, etc. 7.3 FORMER MNR LANDS There is a meeting scheduled for May 22 to look at planning for the former MNR site. An email notice of this meeting will be sent to the Council members. Policy team to bring a recommended action plan on how to make this ? ?? (what) less likely in the future and respond back to the Council. Check to ensure that York Region's planting list for this site are native species. Unsure that we are able to review it ?! ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES RES. #F /02 - MEETING DATES FOR DON COUNCIL AND TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: THAT the following meeting dates be approved; THAT the Watershed Council hold its meetings within the watershed whenever possible; wrt$3 F54 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #5/02 MAY 16, 2002 AND FURTHER THAT meetings be held at various locations throughout the watershed. DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL MEETING # DATE MEETING LOCATION 6/02 Thurs., JUNE 20, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 (AFTER 6:30 PM) 7/02 Thurs., JULY 18, 2002 DEB MARTIN- DOWN'S HOME 8/02 Thurs., SEPTEMBER 19, 2002 ST. PAULS'S ANGICAN CHURCH 9/02 Thurs., OCTOBER 17, 2002 ST. PAUL'S ANGLICAN CHURCH 10/02 Thurs., NOVEMBER 21, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 11/02 Thurs., DECEMBER 19, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM 1 aF .vrs ). X54 j.:,�, A�_�i �w•'�'�_ `..^ - q;YYi`...fimm..�f, �1;A�y[i+ ��1 -. ,�u. a3« MEETING I DATE LOCATION #5/02 TBA TBA #6/02 Thursday July 25, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #4 #7/02 Thursday September 26, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 #8/02 Thursday October 24, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #4 #9/02 Thursday November 28, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 MEETING DATE LOCATION #4/02 Thursday July 4, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 #5/02 Thursday September 12, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #2 #6/02 Thursday October 12, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 #7/02 Thursday November 14, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #4 MAY 16, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #5102 F55 MEETING 1 DATE 1 LOCATION #4/02 Thursday September 5, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #5 #5/02 Thursday November 7, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #5 Report prepared by: Jennifer Bamford, Extension 5305 For information contact: Adele Freeman, Extension 5238 Date: June 12, 2002 COMMITTEE REPORTS /UPDATES /PRESENTATIONS RES. #F /02 - Moved by: Seconded by: THAT the draft minutes of meetings from the following teams, including specific recommendations as noted, be received and endorsed: EDUCATION AND OUTREACH MEETING PROJECTS AND STEWARDSHIP TEAM Paddle the Don We are near capacity, maybe 50 -60 more will be allowed. Invite Robert Fung for next year's Paddle which will be on May 4, 2003. Paula - higher proportion of inexperienced paddlers. Mill Pond Splash Organizing Committee comprised of Barb Anderson, Stephen Cockle, Moyra haney, Michael White and Amy Thurston. There are 19 confirmed displays and a new event: electroshocking. There is a possibility of Duck Races this year. Report prepared by: Jennifer Bamford, extension 5305 F56 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #5/02 MAY 16, 2002 Date: May 14, 2002 UPDATES FROM OTHER DON WATERSHED /ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS Task Force to Bring Back the Don • Working with BMW on site plan and planting plan • Redway Road - Task Force is lobbying against plan to extend this road and are also involved in the Terms of Reference for this study. • Encountering some unhappy citizens about a previously naturalized site not being maintained - illegal activities and assault occurring. Site is at the north end of River Street. • More eager and willing participants in planting activities. • Homeless concerns again because of warmer weather - Projects and Stewardship Team have prepared a 1 page on this issue; Janice Palmer has copies she can email. Friends of the Don East Terraview Willowfield Richmond Hill Naturalists North Toronto Green Community Riversides Pomona Mills Conservationists ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9.30 p.m., on May 16, 2002 Mark Wilson Chair /jb Craig Mather CAO; Secretary Treasurer TRCA THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #6/02 June 20, 2002 Page F59 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #6/02, was held in Committee Room 1, at the North York Civic Centre, 5100 Yonge Street, in the City of Toronto, on Thursday, June 20, 2002. Don Cross, Vice - Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT Margaret Buchinger Member Margaret Casey Co- Vice -Chair Don Cross Co- Vice -Chair Laurian Farrell Member Brendan Flanagan Alternate Member Phil Goodwin Member Lorna Krawchuk Member Deb Martin -Downs Member Kevin Mercer Member Helen Mills Member Roslyn Moore Member Douglas Obright Member Janice Palmer Alternate Member Nancy Penny Member Eduard Sousa Member Michael White Member STAFF Adele Freeman Don /Highland Watershed Specialist Craig Mather CAO - TRCA Jason Scott Senior Plans Analyst Amy Thurston Don Watershed Technical Assistant Lisa Turnbull Team Facilitator 'RES. #F48/02 - MINUTES OF MEETING #5/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Roslyn Moore Janice Palmer THAT the minutes of Meeting #5102, held on May 16, 2002 be approved CARRIED. 01157 F60 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #6/02 JUNE 20, 2002 CORRESPONDENCE 3.1 Letter to Mark Wilson, dated May 24, 2002, from Bernard Made, Chief, Chemicals Control Division, Environment Canada entitled "Multi- stakeholder working group for the evaluation, selection and development of management instruments to reduce the impacts of road salts on the environment." (Attachments available at meeting) 3.2 Letter to Mark Wilson, dated May 14, 2002, from The Honourable Chris Hodgson, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing enclosing the Summary of Consultations of the Five -Year Review of the Provincial Policy Statement. (Summary enclosed) 3.3 Media Release from the Town of Markham on the German Mills Settlers Park Land Acquisition, dated May 30, 2002. 3.4 Letter to Mark Wilson, dated May 22, 2002; from Dave Kaufman, General Manager, City of Toronto Works & Emergency Services regarding the Don Valley Parkway Review Item 3.4 The Policy and Advocacy Team are to meet with members of FODE and the Task Force to bring Back the Don to discuss this issue. We need to reiterate our concerns that the bottom line is no more widening of the Don Valley Parkway. Res. #F49/02 - CORRESPONDENCE ITEM 3.4 Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Casey Michael White THAT a letter be sent to Rod McPhail, Director of Transportation Planning for the City of Toronto stating that the Don Council would like to be involved in the study. .... CARRIED RES. #F50/02 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Phil Goodwin Doug Obright THAT Correspondence Items 3.1 to 3.4 inclusive be received. CARRIED WM 5$ JUNE 20, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #6/02 F61 INFORMATION 4.1 Staff Report to Authority Meeting #5/02, May 24, 2002 entitled "Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan" 4.2 Staff Report to Watershed Management Advisory Board Meeting #3/02, June 14, 2002 entitled "Bartley Smith Greenway - West Don Watershed" RES. #F51/02 - INFORMATION Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Buchinger Kevin Mercer THAT Information Items 4.1 and 4.2 inclusive, be received CARRIED. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF Deb Martin -Downs made a declaration of pecuniary interest in regards to the Burke Brook Ravine item and therefore did not vote on this it. PRESENTATIONS "Watershed Planning Components - Completion Status" Chart Craig Mather spoke to the Don Council on the "Watershed Planning Components - Completion Status" chart. Craig emphasized that the integration of science is a key to watershed planning. He explained that the chart identifies where we are on projects and where we need to focus our attention. Groundwater management is the one obvious requirement. The chart helps to set priorities at budget time. The chart does not address the temporal components but budgeting takes into account each temporal piece. Each year this chart will change to reflect progress and will be used to identify annual requirements. Four other Authorities filled out the chart. If all the Conservation Authorities completed the chart, it would be a useful way to show the province collectively where we are. 01 51 F62 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #6102 JUNE 20, 2002 There are some missing elements to the chart, i.e., Public Education and Watershed Councils /contributions but it is meant strictly as a technical document. We do need to see how the "Forty Steps to a New Don" fits into this as a policy document. There is a need to undertake additional studies for the Don. When the City of Toronto's Wet Weather Flow is complete and the Natural Heritage Strategy, an update to "Forty Steps" may be required. The TRCA's relationship with MOE's new watershed management branch was discussed. The recommendations in the Walkerton Report will make changes in MOE & MNR. TRCA is awaiting the provincial response to Walkerton. A suggestion was made to use the Council as members of the public to liaise with the government (MP's and MPPs). RES. #F53/02 - Burke Brook Ravine ESA Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Casey Laurian Farrell THAT the Projects and Stewardship Team /Policy and Advocacy Team write a letter to the City of Toronto's Commissioner of Planning expressing the Don Council's concern over the general degradation of Burke Brook and to request a public process to address these issues and the proposed infrastructure renewal relating to the Hugh Macmillan Centre redevelopment proposed for this ravine; AND FURTHER THAT copies of this letter be sent to Councillors' Flint and Pitfield. CARRIED Jason Scott advised the Council of an infrastructure renewal project located in Burke Brook Ravine. The current sanitary sewage pipe is broken and a section needs to be replaced. As part of the overall planning process and the site plan /zoning process for the Bloorview MacMillan facility, there were a number of issues discussed with respect to the ravine lands and a public access walkway along the crest. Through a lengthly negotiated settlement, the applicant has agreed to dedicate 5m of tableland as part of the overall dedication, including lands they own below the top -of -bank to the TRCA. They will also carry out restoration works and construct a passive trail. As part of this, the applicant will also be removing and restoring currently paved areas at the top -of -bank. In addition, to the 5m public tableland buffer, TRCA staff recommended a condition for a minimum 7.5m structural setback from the new property boundary. The current structures at their closest wt-i Lit) JUNE 20, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #6/02 F63 point are within 14m of the top -of -bank. The new facility will be at its closest point, 18m from the top of bank. Members of the Don Council identified their concern with the potential disruption to the ravine through the infrastructure renewal program, although it was recognized that there will be water management benefits from the project. This is a high use area and the public that use the area will not be aware of the work that is being undertaken. Members expressed concern that the new site plan accepts a setback of 5 metres and not the 10 metres as recommended in Valley and Stream. POLICY ISSUES 7.1 WALKERTON REPORT PART II RECOMMENDATIONS This item will be held until a TRCA staff report to the Authority has been finalized. RES. #F54/02 - WET WEATHER FLOW MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN Moved by: Seconded by: Nancy Penny Margaret Casey THAT a notice be sent to all Council members to inform them of the workshop. AND FURTHER THAT a meeting for members of the Don Council, the Task Force to Bring Back the Don and Friends of the Don East be scheduled with Rob Bishop, Project Manager for Marshall, Macklin Monaghan for the afternoon of Thursday, July 4, 2002.... CARRIED A City of Toronto's public meeting /workshop to discuss the Don watershed is scheduled for Wednesday, June 26, at the Residence Building, Seneca College at 1750 Finch Avenue East. The additional meeting scheduled for July 4th is suggested to accommodate those that cannot attend the June 26th meeting. wr) F64 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #6/02 JUNE 20, 2002 RES. #F55/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: THAT York Region TESTON ROAD EXTENSION THROUGH MCGILL ESA Lorna Krawchuk Margaret Buchinger staff be invited to a Don Council meeting to discuss this matter. AND FURTHER THAT a letter be written by Margaret Casey and Deb Martin -Downs requesting a meeting with the York Region engineers and the consultants regarding the Teston Road extension through the McGill ESA. CARRIED TRCA staff have requested alternative crossing location routes. At the north there is a spot that is narrower. RES. #F56/02 - COMMENTS ON PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT CONSULTATIONS INCLUDING REFERENCE TO THE EAGLE'S NEST GOLF CLUB Moved by: Seconded by: Deb Martin -Downs Janice Palmer THAT the final letter be copied to all Provincial Members of Parliament and municipal Planning Commissioners within the Don watershed; AND FURTHER THAT the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition and the Humber Watershed Alliance be informed and asked for their support. CARRIED Council wanted to pursue this through the Provincial Policy Statement. Council still waiting for inventory numbers (value of timber versus fines issued.) The fines imposed were much less than the maximum allowed fines. RES. #F56/02 - CITY OF TORONTO'S WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY STUDY Moved by: Seconded by: Lorna Krawchuk Helen Mills THAT the Don Council prepare an action check list drawn from its original submission on the City of Toronto's report on the Water and Wastewater Utility Study for use by Don Council • the imperative of choosing an accountable governance structure, • concern over the process that was undertaken in the first phase of this work and • concern that the Municipal Service Board option continues to be promoted by staff, JUNE 20, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #6/02 F65 despite the lack of clear and defensible arguments advanced for that option; THAT this check list be distributed to Friends of the Don, Task Force to Bring Back the Don members, and to the Humber and Etobicoke /Mimico Alliance for their information and use. AND FURTHER THAT Councillor Irene Jones be thanked for her work as Water Advocate and addressing many of the community concerns in her submission. CARRIED BACKGROUND: The Policy and Finance Committee and the Works Committee, having received the staff report on Water and Wastewater Utility Study and having received oral and /or written submissions from 52 persons as well as councilors 1. referred the report back to the Chief Administrative Officer for a further report, as soon as possible, to another Joint Meeting of the Policy and Finance and the Works Committee for deputations; 2. requested the Chief Administrative Officer to include the following in her forthcoming report: i) process for appointing members to the MSB (Multiple Services Board); ii) Terms of the Transition; iii) operating procedures, including by -laws, etc; and iv) draft by -law to enact an MSB; 3. referred all concerns addressed by deputants, together with the report (June 10, 2002) prepared by Councilor Irene Jones, entitled "Safe Clean Accountable - Water Advocate's Response to the Water Utility study Report", to the Chief Administrative Officer for consideration in the forthcoming report; 4. referred the motions and proposed amendments made by Councillor Irene Jones, Councilor Sandra Bussin; Councillor Jack Layton; and Councillor Pam McConnell. The Don Council noted that despite the overwhelming public concern with the approach recommended in the staff report for the establishment of a Municipal Services Board, and the consultation process, the entire package was referred to the CAO with direction to further pursue a number of aspects of the Municipal Services Board. Council members agreed that instead of writing letters to all the councillors, direct calls to and /or appointments with City of Toronto Councilors should be made by members of the Don Council and others to express their concern that in the Tight of the Walkerton reports, the City of Toronto Council seems to be choosing a less accountable option for water governance than we currently have. 14 I/3 F66 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #6/02 JUNE 20, 2002 ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES RES. #F57/02 - MEETING DATES FOR DON COUNCIL AND TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: Laurian Farrell Doug Obright THAT the following meeting dates be approved; THAT the Watershed Council hold its meetings within the watershed whenever possible; AND FURTHER THAT meetings be held at various locations throughout the watershed. CARRIED DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL MEETING # DATE MEETING LOCATION 7/02 Thurs., JULY 18, 2002 DEB MARTIN - DOWN'S HOME 8/02 Thurs., SEPTEMBER 19, 2002 ST. PAULS'S ANGLICAN CHURCH 9/02 Thurs., OCTOBER 17, 2002 ST. PAUL'S ANGLICAN CHURCH 10/02 Thurs., NOVEMBER 21, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 11/02 Thurs., DECEMBER 19, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 }y' i V '�P"'.'e'• ".. x a'tn.�.,if'1``tp i'^t, i1 w�rt t 4e iq MEETING DATE LOCATION #6/02 Thursday July 25, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #4 #7/02 Thursday September 26, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 #8/02 Thursday October 24, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #4 #9/02 Thursday November 28, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 JUNE 20, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #6/02 F67 a sy J 36�. 5 d t °�*M1K r' IC ' lad wS I� _' ^'Yt A a+�4'N"^ -' ■ `'�'S�< r�xr's �- ,c � x ds� � �rx MEETING DATE LOCATION #4/02 Thursday July 4, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 #5/02 Thursday September 12, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #2 #6/02 Thursday October 12, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 #7/02 Thursday November 14, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #4 • _ _ _oy.•y>>,.pa. yam }a -„"y i, _ i5t�3 E � - .; ,� - .,+�5• •4 >.,° - ..e':. MEETING DATE I LOCATION #4/02 Thursday September 5, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #5 #5/02 Thursday November 7, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #5 COMMITTEE REPORTS /UPDATES /PRESENTATIONS RES. #F58/02 - COMMITTEE REPORTS Moved by: Seconded by: Nancy Penny Eduard Sousa THAT the draft minutes of meetings from the following teams, including specific recommendations as noted, be received and endorsed: PROJECTS AND STEWARDSHIP TEAM - Minutes #4/02, May 30, 2002 EDUCATION AND OUTREACH TEAM - Minutes #3/02, June 6, 2002 POLICY AND ADVOCACY TEAM - Minutes #3/02, June 12, 2002 CARRIED. jM r S� F68 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #6/02 JUNE 20, 2002 INFORMATION UPDATE FROM TEAMS: Policy & Advocacy Team 1. Road Salts: • the Don Council stated that they prefer to participate in a multi - stakeholder working group; • we are the second of a 5 nation consult on road salts; • industry and other participants are moving towards a voluntary practice • we need to argue that degraded areas need to be treated just like environmentally significant areas; • we need to ask for broader stakeholder participation • The Policy and Advocacy Team to ask council to join them in this initiative • need to inform other groups to support environmental position • there has been a 1.5 million dollar lobby to convince Ottawa to not put salt on Schedule 1 for PSL. • Council agreed to go ahead, they approved the process • It was noted that this is a consumer problem also - no other products are available • The next 'On the Don' should provide alternatives Education and Outreach Team • Trash examples - good news stories • Submit short articles by end of June - middle of July UPDATES FROM OTHER DON WATERSHED /ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS Terraview Park/Willowfield Gardens Park Regeneration Nancy Penny provided a map of the abandoned hydro corridor next to Terraview Park/Willowfield Gardens Park. She noted that: • Hydro One owns the property • Need to urge Hydro One to let us continue with project and turn into greenspace. This narrow corridor contains a channelized watercourse as well as a gas pipeline. Most if not all, of the corridor is flood plain and therefore not suitable for development. Bob Raw is a new board member of Hydro One. Nancy Penny will draft a letter to Hydro One including before and after photos of Terraview Willowfield and request his help in releasing these lands for public greenspace and environmental restoration. This work should be co- ordinated with the City of Toronto staff and the local councillors. Task Force to Bring Back the Don Lost Rivers Friends of the Don East LJM IA) JUNE 20, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #6/02 F69 Richmond Hill Naturalists North Toronto Green Community Riversides Pomona Mills Conservationists INFORMATION RE DON EVENTS 10th Anniversary in October • October 29, 1992 - first Don Watershed Task Force meeting • What will we do? • Option of having an event at Southbrook Farm and invite members and consultants of the past. Paddle the Don • It is to be the big Public Event • Suggestion was to still do one other unique event - Train Ride - Bring together the "Don Family" ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9.30 p.m., on June 20, 2002 Mark Wilson Chair /jb Craig Mather CAO; Secretary Treasurer TRCA ts. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #7/02 July 18, 2002 Page F70 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #7/02, was held at Deb Martin - Down's home at 91 Kirk Drive, in the Town of Thornhill, on Thursday, July 18, 2002. Mark Wilson ,Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT Barbara Anderson Member Margaret Casey Co- Vice -Chair Stephen Cockle Member Geoffrey Cook Member Don Cross Co- Vice -Chair Paula Davies Member Moyra Haney Member Brenda Hogg Member Deb Martin -Downs Member Kevin Mercer Member Douglas Obright Member Janice Palmer Alternate Member Nancy Penny Member Mel Plewes Member Michael White Member Mark White Chair STAFF David Burnett Oak Ridges Moraine Coordinator Adele Freeman Don /Highland Watershed Specialist Mark Lowe Staff, Environmental Services Section Greg Sadowski Bartley Smith Greenway Project Coordinator Amy Thurston Don Watershed Technical Assistant Ken Towle Technician, Resource Science GUEST Elsie Petch Richmond Hill Field Naturalists John Wilson Task Force to Bring Back the Don F71 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #7/02 July 18, 2002 RES. #59/02 - THANK YOU Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Casey Don Cross THAT Deb Martin -Downs and her family be thanked for hosting this meeting at their home and the generous hospitality shown to all CARRIED RES. #F60/02 - MINUTES OF MEETING #6/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Paula Davies Janice Palmer THAT the minutes of Meeting #6/02, held on June 20, 2002 be approved CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE 3.1 Letter to Mark Wilson dated June 20, 2002, from Elizabeth A. McLaren, Assistant Deputy Minister, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing regarding Glen Eagle's Golf Course 3.2 Notice of Consultation Meeting Community Stakeholders, City of Vaughan received July 4, 2002 regarding Masterplan for the former MNR lands. 3.3 Letter to Mark Wilson dated July 2, 2002 from The Honourable Jerry J. Ouellette, Minister of Natural Resources regarding the Rizmi Holdings. 3.4 Letter to Mark Wilson dated July 5, 2002 from the Honourable Chris Stockwell, Minister of Environment and Energy regarding Ontario's $50 million commitment to clean up the Great Lakes. 3.5 Letter to Ron Christie, Rouge Park Alliance dated June 3, 2002 from John O'Gorman regarding "Infrastructure in River Valleys ". Mr. O'Gorman submitted this letter for inclusion on the Don Council's Agenda. RES. #F61/02 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Moyra Haney Michael White THAT Correspondence Items 3.1 to 3.5 inclusive be received. CARRIED Wrl 69 JULY 18, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #7102 F72 INFORMATION 4.1 Staff Report to Watershed Management Advisory Board, Meeting #4/02, July 12, 2002; entitled "Walkerton Inquiry Part 2 Report Implications" 4.2 "Towards Safe Harbours: 2002 Report Card" prepared by the Bay Area Restoration Council 11 -17 18 -21 RES. #F62/02 - INFORMATION Moved by: Margaret Casey Seconded by: Geoffrey Cook THAT Information Items 4.1 and 4.2 inclusive, be received CARRIED. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF Deb Martin -Downs made a declaration of pecuniary interest with regard to the Infrastructure Work in Burke Brooke Ravine ESA item and therefore did not vote on this item. POLICY ISSUES RES. #F63/02 - WALKERTON REPORT PART II RECOMMENDATIONS Moved by: Seconded by: Don Cross Moyra Haney THAT the Don Watershed Regeneration Council supports the development of source protection plans, the development of watershed plans and the involvement of the public in the development of these plans; AND FURTHER THAT the Province be requested to provide financial assistance to the municipalities and conservation authorities to develop these programs. CARRIED BACKGROUND Part 2 of the Walkerton Inquiry, A Strategy for Safe Drinking Water, was released by the Ontario Government on May 23, 2002. The Hon. Justice Dennis O'Connor, Commissioner was charged F73 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #7/02 July 18, 2002 with leading the Inquiry. Part 2 focused on recommendations for improved public policy and programs that will ensure the safety of Ontario's drinking water supply. The Part 2 Report's recommendations reflected virtually all of the recommendations made by Conservation Ontario. Staff from TRCA participated in the Conservation Ontario team that prepared written submissions to the Inquiry and took part in the expert meetings and public hearings. Justice O'Connor focused considerable attention to the importance of protecting drinking water sources as the first step in a multi- barrier approach to drinking water supply management. He identified the need for source protection plans to be prepared on a watershed basis, and the conservation authorities role in this effort. • Watershed -based source protection plans should be prepared and recognized for all watersheds in Ontario. Ideally they should form part of a broader watershed management plan Provincial permitting and regulatory decisions that affect drinking water sources must be consistent with the approved source protection plan Municipal Official Plans and decisions must be consistent with the plan, where potential significant direct threats to drinking water sources exist, and have regard to the plan in all other areas MOE should be the lead agency for all aspects of drinking water, including oversight responsibility for source protection plans. A Watershed Management Branch should be formed within the MOE MOE should establish the framework for developing source protection plans, help fund and participate in their development, and approve the completed plans MOE should also have oversight responsibility for the protection of drinking water, under a Drinking Water Branch Source Protection Planning should be done at a local watershed level by those most directly affected. The CA model was recognized as an existing watershed -based planning body that operates with the full participation of its watershed municipalities CAs should coordinate the plans' development, where possible, otherwise the MOE should take on this coordination role CA role in managing the local consultation process is explicitly identified CA role in local implementation activities that promote education and stewardship is noted O'Connor does not believe that the CAs need to be moved from MNR to MOE to fulfill their new responsibility, but leaves this decision with the Province All large or intensive farms and all farms in areas designated as high risk in the source protection plan should develop binding individual farm water protection plans. - MOE should take the lead in regulating the potential impacts of farm activities on w 171 JULY 18, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #7/02 F74 • drinking water sources The Province should ensure sufficient funding for the planning and adoption of source protection plans. - Funding should be derived from a combination of sources, including the provincial tax base, user pay and polluter pay sources - The province should develop guidelines to determine what is appropriately charged where • MOE, on behalf of the Province, should develop a comprehensive "source to tap" drinking water policy covering all elements of the provision of drinking water. Private well owners are recognized as having responsibility for the security of their own water supplies. - The Province should provide and disseminate information to raise awareness and make water testing accessible. The Part 2 Report recommended that, as a minimum, watershed -based source protection plans should include the following: • a water budget for the watershed, or a plan for developing a water budget where sufficient data are not yet available; • the identification of all significant water withdrawals, including municipal intakes; • land use maps for the watershed; • the identification of wellhead areas; • maps of areas of groundwater vulnerability that include characteristics such as depth to bedrock, depth to water table, the extent of aquifers, and recharge rates; • the identification of all major point and non -point sources of contaminants in the watershed; • a model that describes the fate of pollutants in the watershed; • a program for identifying and properly decommissioning abandoned wells, excavations, quarries, and other shortcuts that can introduce contaminants into aquifers; • the identification of areas where a significant direct threat exists to the safety of drinking water (in such cases, municipal official plans and zoning decisions must be consistent with the plan); and • the identification of significant knowledge gaps and or research needs to help target monitoring efforts. Groundwater - related source protection studies are not a high priority in the Highland, Mimico, and Don Watersheds, as these watersheds are almost completely serviced by Lake Ontario based municipal supply. Adequate groundwater modeling information, surface water quality modelling, and water budget studies are well underway and will be completed by 2003. The City of Toronto already has a lakefront receiving water model set up and running. Integration with the other watershed plan components and with the nearshore lake environment, and preparation of source protection plans could be completed by 2005, if adequate funds were available. The preparation of a source protection plan for those watersheds that are predominantly served by Lake Ontario may require a slightly different approach than areas influenced almost completely t,JM1z F75 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #7/02 July 18, 2002 by local sources. Although the local Toronto Region watersheds affect the nearshore Lake Ontario environment, contaminant sources also arise from upstream in the Great Lakes basin and from "imported" sources, such as atmospheric deposition and the discharge of ballast water from ships. TRCA's participation in the Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan, the International Joint Commission's Water Quality Board, and other advocacy initiatives will continue to be important means to promote action in jurisdictions outside of the geographic mandate of the TRCA. TRCA will seek clarification from the province on the requirements for source protection plans associated with surface water supplies. RES. #F64/02 - MULTI - STAKEHOLDER WORKING GROUP FOR ROAD SALTS Moved by: Seconded by Mel Plewes Don Cross THAT the Don Watershed Regeneration Council endorse the sign -up letter to Environment Canada and submit it to the Minister of the Environment; THAT the Don Council send a letter as well as the "sign -up" letter and background material to "like- minded" groups such as STORM and FODE to ask them to support this Initiative; AND FURTHER THAT the Don Council send a letter along with the "sign -up" letter and background material to the Chairs of the Humber Alliance, Etobicoke - Mimico Creeks Watershed Coalition and Carruthers Creek Watersheds Task Forces encouraging them to support this initiative and to submit a "sign -up" letter to the Minister. CARRIED BACKGROUND Mel Plewes, Chair of the Policy and Advocacy Team presented an update on the Road Salt issue to Council. Currently, the Don Watershed Regeneration Council participates as a corresponding member of the Multi- Stakeholder Working Group for road salts. Riversides and Environmental Defense Canada (EDC) are the only 2 ENGO's participating in the 35 representatives multi - stakeholder process. Riversides and EDC are putting forward a position in support of the Environmental Canada recommendation that road salts be placed on the Priority Substance List (PSL), Schedule 1. The DWRC supports this initiative and will forward it to the Chairs and members of the Humber Alliance, the Etobicoke - Mimico Creeks Watershed Coalition and the Duffins and Carruthers Watersheds Task Force for their endorsement. UPDATE - INFRASTRUCTURE WORK IN BURKE BROOKE RAVINE ESA wri73 JULY 18, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #7/02 F76 This letter has been drafted and will be sent to Paul Bedford, Commissioner of Planning, City of Toronto shortly. BACKGROUND At Don Council Meeting #6/02, RES. #F53/02 was approved: "THAT the Projects and Stewardship Team /Policy and Advocacy Team write a letter to the City of Toronto's Commissioner of Planning expressing the Don Council's concern over the general degradation of Burke Brook and to request a public process to address these issues and the proposed infrastructure renewal relating to the Hugh Macmillan Centre redevelopment proposed for this ravine; AND FURTHER THAT copies of this letter be sent to Councillors' Flint and Pitfield. Members of the Don Council identified their concern with the potential disruption to the ravine through the infrastructure renewal program, although it was recognized that there will be water management benefits from the project. This is a high use area and the public that use the area will not be aware of the work that is being undertaken. Members expressed concern that the new site plan accepts a setback of 5 metres and not the 10 RES. #F66/02- EXPANSION OF REDWAY ROAD Moved by: Seconded by Janice Palmer Geoffrey Cook THAT following minor modifications, this letter be sent to the City of Toronto. CARRIED BACKGROUND he Don Watershed Regeneration Council objects to the designation of an extension of Redway Road from Millwood Road to Bayview Avenue as a "planned but unbuilt road" under the draft Toronto Official Plan. In the old Metro Official Plan, after lengthy debate, this road was formally "deferred" by the Metro Council. This designation has been made without adequate consultation on its implications and without proper consideration of the environmental priorities of the draft Official Plan. In addition, other reasonable measures to address the alleged need for this road have not been implemented, such as appropriate traffic calming in South Leaside. There are strong concerns that the proposed road would draw significantly more traffic to the South Leaside area. Wr11 g F77 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #7102 July 18, 2002 ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES RES. #F67/02 - MEETING DATES FOR DON COUNCIL AND TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: Nancy Penny Doug Obright THAT the following meeting dates be approved; THAT the Watershed Council hold its meetings within the watershed whenever possible; AND FURTHER THAT meetings be held at various locations throughout the watershed. CARRIED DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL MEETING # DATE MEETING LOCATION 8/02 Thurs., SEPTEMBER 19, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 9/02 Thurs., OCTOBER 17, 2002 ST. PAUL'S ANGLICAN CHURCH 10/02 Thurs., NOVEMBER 21, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 11/02 Thurs., DECEMBER 19, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 ,,��ii��t. '1- ejaX; '!4i �. � F„ ��. �.- . �IYI "a,, a. }�pv; OV . M+,_ SS'' �.. f C.` �s�fr` .f� ,� A h - ?:d`,'. .. }. ,t .`T L•"e�.441':trt =,� . rj6^! ,� MEETING DATE LOCATION #7/02 Thursday September 26, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 #8/02 Thursday October 24, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #4 #9/02 Thursday November 28, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 POLICY & ADVOCACY TEAM MEETING 1 DATE I LOCATION #5/02 Thursday September 12, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #2 #6/02 Thursday October 12, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 #7/02 Thursday November 14, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #4 .. _ wF'z5*,;' ^•�.,:T?r?: °` `�`An�, ts- w..:.. ,. • =:X!` _.,a 'Pn,�d54C�'= °c;:.pe µ. "..`':w ..ru`'�4 "f, EDUe'1= T j ■[� ..R 3c� i`v 1xvi�':(. ^. .i. ,AS •: t p q MEETING I DATE I LOCATION #4/02 Thursday September 5, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #5 #5/02 Thursday November 7, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #5 COMMITTEE REPORTS /UPDATES /PRESENTATIONS RES. #F68/02 - COMMITTEE REPORTS Moved by: Seconded by: Nancy Penny Mel Plewes THAT the draft minutes of meetings from the following teams, including specific recommendations as noted, be received and endorsed: POLICY AND ADVOCACY MEETING - Minutes of Meeting #4/02, held July 4, 2002 PROJECTS AND STEWARDSHIP MEETING - Minutes of Meeting #5/02, held July 9, 2002 CARRIED ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9.30 p.m., on July 18, 2002 Mark Wilson Chair /jb Craig Mather CAO; Secretary Treasurer TRCA c. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 September 19, 2002 Page F79 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #8/02, was held in Committee Room 1 at the North York Civic Centre, 5100 Yonge Street, in the City of Toronto, on Thursday, September 19, 2002. Mark Wilson ,Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT Margaret Buchinger Member Margaret Casey Co- Vice -Chair Stephen Cockle Member Geoffrey Cook Member Don Cross Co- Vice -Chair Paula Davies Member Laurian Farrell Member Moyra Haney Member Peter Heinz Member Lorna Krawchuk Member Deb Martin -Downs Member Warren May Member Dick O'Brien Member Janice Palmer Alternate Member Nancy Penny Member Mel Plewes Member Michael White Member Mark Wilson Chair GUEST Peter Cholewa Project Manager, Transportation & Works Dept., Region of York Allan Ortlieb Director, Traffic & Transportation Planning, Giffels Associates Ltd. Elsie Petch Richmond Hill Field Naturalists STAFF Jennifer Bamford Administrative Assistant Adele Freeman Don /Highland Watershed Specialist Jason Scott Senior Planner Amy Thurston Don Watershed Technical Assistant w 47 7 September 19, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 F80 RES. #69/02- MINUTES OF MEETING #702 Moved by: Seconded by: Moyra Haney Mel Plewes THAT the minutes of Meeting #7102, held on July 18, 2002 be approved CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE 3.1 Letter to Ken Peterson, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing regarding comments on Summary of Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) Consultations dated July 31, 2002 from Mark Wilson, Chair, Don Council 3.2 Letter to The Honourable David Anderson, Minister of the Environment regarding Road Salts Consultation Process dated September 8, 2002 from Mel Plewes, Chair of the Policy and Advocacy Committee 3.3 Letter to the Chairs and Members of the Humber Watershed Alliance, Etobicoke- Mimico Creeks Watershed Coalition and Duffins and Carruthers Creek Watersheds Task Force regarding Road Salts Consultation Process dated September 8, 2002, from Mel Plewes, Chair of the Policy and Advocacy Committee. 3.4 Letter to Mr. Doug Stewart, Director of Real Estate Services, dated August 2, 2002 from Bayview - Blythwood Ratepayer's Association regarding the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College site located at 1900 Bayview Avenue 3.5 Report to Policy and Advocacy Committee regarding attendance of Don Council members at the former Ministry of Natural Resources lands - Masterplan and Site Walk 3.6 Letter from Hilda Mackow, President and CEO or Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. and Yves Rheault, Vice - Chairman of the Board, Business Development, Boralex Inc. dated Summer 2002 regarding Cogeneration Facility in Toronto's Port Lands. RES. #F70/02 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Don Cross Janice Palmer THAT Correspondence Items 3.1 to 3.6 inclusive be received. CARRIED el e F81 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 September 19, 2002 INFORMATION 4.1 Staff Report to the Watershed Management Advisory Board Meeting #5/02, September 13, 2002 entitled "Don Mills Barrier Mitigation on the East Don River at Don Mills Road" 4.2 Staff Report to the Watershed Management Advisory Board Meeting #5/02, September 13, 2002 entitled " Monitoring of Aesthetic Conditions in Watercourses in the Toronto Region" 4.3 Nutrient Management Act Information Night - Thursday, Sept. 26, 2002, 7 -9 pm; Boyd Field Centre 4.4 City of Toronto - new Official Plan - Notice of Public Meeting - Tuesday, September 24 RES. #F71/02 - INFORMATION Moved by: Seconded by: Don Cross Peter Heinz THAT Information Items 4.1 to 4.4 inclusive, be received CARRIED. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF Deb Martin -Downs made a declaration of pecuniary interest with regard to Items 3.5 and 3.6 of the Correspondence Section and therefore did not vote on Res. #F70/02. PRESENTATION RES. #F72/02 - TESTON ROAD EXTENSION Moved by: Seconded by: Mel Plewes Don Cross THAT the Policy and Advocacy Committee continue working with the Region of York on this project with regards to viable alternate solutions; AND FURTHER THAT the Policy and Advocacy Committee report back to the Don Council at a future meeting. September 19, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 F82 BACKGROUND Peter Cholewa, Project Manager, Transportation Design and Construction Branch for the Region of York, along with Allan Ortlieb, P. Eng., Director of Traffic & Transportation Planning for Giffels Associates Limited gave a presentation to the Don Council members on the Teston Road extension. Mr. Cholewa and Mr. Ortlieb presented the Council with the 3 alternate routes within the McGill ESA, ANSI and Vaughan landfill site. The favoured alternate is to build a 5 pier bridge over the McGiII ESA. The proposed method of construction would be to "launch" a steel box structure from pier to pier to reduce impacts on the ground below. The Teston Road extension project is undergoing a Class EA Study. The extension will pass through the areas of Purpleville Creek and Cold Creek within the Humber River valley. The study area will be Teston Road, west of Bathurst to Highway 400. The area of concern to the Don Council is the McGiII ESA. The area is undergoing a construction boom with more construction planned within the next few years, therefore transportation corridors need to be upgraded. Teston Road is situated at the northern limit the City of Vaughan and the Region felt it would be the best route through the area for the upcoming heavier transportation loads and would link with a new interchange at Highway 400. Both Major Mackenzie Drive and King Road have 4 lane constraints because of land ownership issues whereas Teston Road can be widened to 6 lanes. Region of York staff commented that roads any further north would not be viable as the public would not want to travel north in order to travel south on Highway 400. It is expected that the Class EA will be available in late October. The Don Council would like to see further studies being done on the extension based on the requirements for an Oak Ridges Moraine Core Area because of impacts on the McGiII ESA and the ANSI within the area. The Policy and Advocacy Team will be continuing to monitor this project and working with the Region of York on other ideas that have less damaging impacts. POLICY ISSUES RES. #F73/02 - MONITORING OF AESTHETIC CONDITIONS IN WATERCOURSES IN THE TORONTO REGION - COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Moved by: Seconded by: Deb Martin -Downs Margaret Casey THAT the following be received for information; THAT Don Watershed Regeneration Council members be thanked for their participation in the 2001 Toronto Region aesthetics survey; W M ID F83 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 September 19, 2002 THAT Don Watershed Regeneration Council members track the visual aesthetic condition of watercourses in the Don River watershed by completing at least one visual aesthetics survey on a watercourse or section of the waterfront-of their choice during October 1 -31, 2002; AND FURTHER THAT community volunteers be sought to participate in the October 1 -31, 2002 visual aesthetics survey. BACKGROUND Aesthetics conditions in Toronto region streams and waterfront are one of the impaired beneficial uses, which contribute to the region's designation as an Area of Concern. To fulfill Remedial Action Plan (RAP) reporting requirements, the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program included 'aesthetics' as an indicator and recommended an associated monitoring approach involving an annual community based survey. The first pilot survey of aesthetic conditions for Toronto region watercourses and the waterfront was conducted during the month of October 2001. The watershed groups and community volunteers led the assessment, with technical support from TRCA staff. The exercise attracted media attention, with features in both print media and cable television. Based on a method developed for the Rouge River Area of Concern in Michigan, and input from the Don Council and other watershed groups, the survey evaluated aesthetic conditions using four key indicators: water colour, water clarity, water odour and the presence of visible debris and litter. Each of the indicators was scored separately (out of 10) and the average of the four indicator scores provided the overall site score. Among the 94 sites surveyed, 57 were ranked as good (score between 7.5 and 10), 26 were ranked as fair (score between 5 and 7.4) and 11 were considered to be poor (score of less than 5). Average watershed scores were highest in Duffins Creek (8.5), followed by Highland Creek (7.9), Don River (7.4), and finally the Etobicoke Creek and Rouge River watersheds (6.1). However, the sample size in some watersheds was very small ( <10), and there were no surveys returned for Carruthers and Petticoat Creek watersheds, or for the Waterfront. Modifications to the survey form and expansion of the geographical scope of monitoring activities were recommended for future visual aesthetics monitoring in the Toronto Region. The final report from the 2001 survey is available on the TRCA website. Improvements have been made to the survey form and plans are in place to administer a second annual survey in October 2002. The Don Council and other TRCA watershed groups will again be asked to assist in promoting and participating in the survey. RATIONALE • Continued monitoring of aesthetics in the Don River will help to better characterize areas previously not monitored and improve confidence in earlier results. • Aesthetics monitoring data will be used in future Don watershed report cards, assist with evaluating the status of beneficial use impairments of the Toronto and Region RAP, and provide direction for future /clean -up activities. • Community participation in monitoring is expected to help foster community stewardship. • Aesthetics monitoring helps to fulfil objectives of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. September 19, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 F84 FINANCIAL DETAILS Staff resources for the aesthetics program data analysis are supported by funding available in account #124 -15. For information contact: Tim Van Seters, ext. 5337 Date: August 28, 2002 RES. #F74/02 - SUPPORT FOR ENVIRONMENT CANADA ECOACTION PROPOSAL: HEALTHY BACKYARDS: PESTICIDE FREE CAMPAIGN Moved by: Seconded by: Margaret Casey Paula Davies THAT the members of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council endorse the Healthy Backyards: Pesticide Free Campaign; AND FURTHER THAT a letter of support for the Healthy Backyards: Pesticide Free Campaign is sent to Environment Canada's EcoAction Community Funding Program on behalf of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council. BACKGROUND The Living City Campaign, a partnership between the Conservation Foundation - a local, community - governed charity with a 40 -year record of supporting environmental protection in the Toronto area - and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, embodies a vision for the protection and restoration of ecological health in the Toronto region. To achieve this, watershed management strategies are being developed and their associated recommended actions implemented across the Greater Toronto Area. These actions fall under The Living City programs of Healthy Rivers: The lifeblood of our habitat - ensuring healthy rivers by working and planning on a watershed basis, protecting rivers from their headwaters in the Oak Ridges Moraine to their deltas where they enter Lake Ontario; and Education: Making changes now for a sustainable future where practical sustainable lifestyle alternatives will be promoted and people are encouraged to make environmentally friendly decisions. RATIONALE A campaign to reduce the residential use of pesticides meets the goals and objectives of The Living City Campaign and helps to achieve water quality objectives as outlined in the watershed management strategies. This campaign is called The Healthy Backyards: Pesticide Free Campaign. The Healthy Backyard: Pesticide Free Campaign focuses on changing people's lawn care practices to using organic methods instead of the traditional chemical applications for pest F85 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8102 September 19, 2002 control. This will result in a reduction in the amount of pesticides tha are being applied to residential lawns, a reduction in the amount of pesticides that are entering local creeks through the stormsewer system, and an increase in the number of lawns that are converted from chemical to natural maintenance techniques. This campaign is based on the Caledon Countryside Alliance Weedgee Kidz program where a group of students work in select communities offering to weed people's front lawns for free, and providing information to the residents about the benefits of maintaining a pesticide free lawn and how to achieve this. This program has been extremely successful in Caledon, reaching over 200 houses during the summer of 2002. Within the Toronto region, this campaign will be undertaken in the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watersheds (Heart Lake, Malton and South Mimico Community Action Areas), in the Don River watershed (Summerhill Area and other areas), and in the Humber River watershed (Woodbridge). Because this campaign is targeted for areas across four TRCA watersheds, the proponent of the project will be the Conservation Foundation. Funding for this campaign is being sought from the Environment Canada EcoAction Community Funding program, which funds community based environmental initiatives focussing on Clean Water, Clean Air, and Habitat. The proposal to EcoAction will be submitted on October 1", 2002. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding is being requested from the Environment Canada EcoAction Community Funding Program. Matching funding is being secured through Peel Natural Heritage and Toronto RAP. Other partners to this project are currently being approached. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE finalize funding partners and collect letters of support for the campaign submission of the EcoAction funding proposal on October 1', 2002 determine the number of students to be hired based on the funding approvals from EcoAction For information contact: Kristin Geater, at 416 - 661 -6600, ext. 5667 Date: September 10, 2002 RES. #F75/02- CITY OF TORONTO - PROPOSED NEW OFFICIAL PLAN Moved by: Seconded by: Don Cross Mel Plewes THAT the letter to the City of Toronto regarding their draft Official Plan include comments from the Nature's City report submitted by the Don Council, Humber Alliance and Rouge wri 3 September 19, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 F86 Alliance in December of 1999; AND FURTHER THAT Margaret Casey be asked to stand as the Don Watershed Regeneration Council representative at the City of Toronto's upcoming Transportation Committee in regards to the City of Toronto Official Plan; BACKGROUND The letter below is the draft submission to the City of Toronto regarding their draft Official Plan. The final submission will be in the next Don Council Agenda. Submission to the City of Toronto Draft Official Plan by the Don Watershed Regeneration Council September 24, 2002 Final Introduction; The Don Watershed Council is a group of citizens appointed by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority together with municipal representatives, which has a mandate to assist in achieving the vision of a revitalized urban river and watershed. A comprehensive regeneration strategy - "Forty Steps to a New Don" was endorsed in 1994 and considerable progress has been made in the last 8 years through the efforts of thousands of volunteers and in partnerships with other environmental groups and governments towards the goals: To protect what is healthy; Regenerate what is degraded; and Take responsibility for the Don. Continued success is only possible through cooperation and support of many players. One of the key partners must be local government, which makes the decisions on development, transportation, parks and open space, which will have a profound effect the health of the watershed. The Official Plan (not just the Environmental Plan) must have strong policies on protection and regeneration of the natural environment and the open space system to provide the right direction for all decision making. Nature's City: In 1999 the City was seeking ideas on new directions in an open and transparent consultation process. In response, the Don Council, together with the Humber Alliance and the Rouge Park Alliance made a submission - "Seeing the Forest and the Trees ". The bottom line of that submission was that we - the people of Toronto - are one component of a natural urban ecosystem in which there is a mutual dependence between environmental well being and a thriving economic and social life. An ecosystem means that everything is connected to everything else. To put it simply, growth and change can have a profound effect on the air we breathe, the health of the rivers and trees and the water that we drink. A healthy, self- sustaining natural environment is the foundation (not just one of the pillars) for a true urban renaissance and the realization of a "great city ". We are not there yet! Volunteer groups like the Don Council have worked hard for 8 years to repair the damage and have enjoyed some success. But our F87 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 September 19, 2002 irreplaceable natural heritage has been ravaged by several centuries of neglect and needs a continuing, and increasing investment in protection and even more important, in regeneration. The City appeared to have heard our message. The OP directions report of June 2000 - "Toronto at the Crossroads" emphasized that "nature sustains and encompasses our city" It further acknowledged that the green network serves not only human needs but sustains plant and animal communities - a true ecosystem approach. To perform all of these functions adequately, the City recommended that the broken linkages must be reestablished and a "greening" approach adopted. The City identified three strategies relating to the degree of intervention required - protection (relatively healthy ecosystems), enhancement (existing systems needing improvement) and transformation (seriously degraded areas needing major regeneration investment). One of the first steps in this enlightened vision was a study to evaluate the natural environment, to identify degraded areas and recommend regeneration measures. This Natural Heritage Study - a cooperative effort between the City and TRCA - has recently been completed. The road map to environmental health and biodiversity is ready. What is missing is the basic understanding in the OP that the natural environment and its restoration are important and valuable objectives for a healthy city irrespective of human use. In fact, recreational activities, although essential to healthy life styles, add further stresses to the system, which must be factored into restoration and maintenance programs. The natural environment has an intrinsic value in and of itself. If it is neglected and not regenerated into a healthy ecosystem the quality of life of every city dweller will be diminished. Unfortunately the OP relegates improvements to the natural environment almost exclusively to the process of growth and change. It is reactive rather than proactive and improvements (other than those undertaken by community volunteers) are largely limited to development applications. There is no commitment to the city wide regeneration embraced in their own OP directions report. The OP needs to apply the same bold and comprehensive approach to the natural environmental as it has taken with the Heritage Resources policies and commit to a program and schedule of regeneration throughout the City. Recommendations for modifications to specific policies are discussed below. Green Space System: (Section 2.3.2) This section is strongly people- oriented giving the message that the primary value of open spaces is for human recreation. However, it is important to remember that green systems must be recognized for their intrinsic environmental values. The text acknowledges that the Green Space System lands "are the core of the City's ecosystem providing habitat for flora and fauna ". This must be reaffirmed in the policies Policy 1, which lists action to be taken to improve, preserve and enhance the system, should be expanded to include improvements consistent with ecologically based watershed principles. ISM "K September 19, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 F88 The Natural Environment: (Section 3.4) This section, which purports to address the importance of a healthy natural environment, in fact deals with the environment only in the context of development. It fails to recognize that even without development the natural systems are under considerable stress and will require comprehensive, regenerative efforts to ensure a healthy natural environment to support the Plan's strong communities and competitive economy. The policies are largely reactive in the sense of preventing further degradation whereas they need to be imaginative and aggressive and set a clear path to environmental upgrading. The Plan needs to target environmental improvements in the same way that it targets areas for growth and reference the detailed strategies already in place such as The Environmental Plan and Watershed Plans. Policy 2 addresses the objective of providing on - site stormwater facilities wherever possible. The Council supports the "treatment train" approach to stormwater management and encourages on - site facilities with one proviso - that the facilities do not diminish or have a negative impact on natural features or functions on the site. This policy should also spell out the primary requirement that every development must provide stormwater control (on or off site) to ensure no net increase in stormwater flows or further degradation of water quality. Policy 6(b) provides a blanket approval for underground utilities in valleylands. The Council recognizes that in the past it was customary to locate sewers in the valley for convenience due to a lack of understanding of the impact of construction on habitats and natural features and functions. Negative impacts are significant and cannot be entirely mitigated. Therefore this policy should be revised to discourage new utilities or replacement of underground utilities in valleylands. Where this cannot be avoided then it should be combined with significant restoration, not just of the disturbance from construction, but to a higher level taking into account previously degraded conditions. (i.e., a net benefit). Policy 9 and 10. The Council strongly discourages any development in significant and sensitive elements of the natural heritage system. In the past, intrusion into natural features was allowed subject only to an environmental impact study and recommendations on measures to mitigate negative impacts. Experience shows that mitigation is difficult to assess, often inadequate and in some cases has proven to be a ticket to degeneration and even the loss of previously healthy features. This is no longer acceptable. In the case of underlying land use designations, development should only be considered on those parts of the property where there are no significant or sensitive features and adequate protection can be provided General. The Council recognizes the limitations on land available to achieve the multiplicity of recreation and environmental objectives of the Plan and supports the principle of multiple uses. For example, the combination of an infiltration bed with a soccer field on top (which solves both the recreational and stormwater control objectives) has been successfully implemented in the Terraview/Willowfield regeneration project in Scarborough. The Plan needs to encourage these types of shared uses as it does with shared use of parking. W r1 S' b F89 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 September 19, 2002 The Council also wishes to underline the fact that road drainage, particularly in older, built -up areas is a major issue in stormwater management. The city is already implementing pilot infiltration projects to reduce the amount of rainwater entering the sewer system. Therefore the City policies should include an intent to improve /replace current design and construction practices. We suggest that the City (here or elsewhere in the Plan) give a commitment to incorporate stormwater controls into road construction and reconstruction wherever soil conditions allow. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES RES. #F76/02 - MEETING DATES FOR DON COUNCIL AND TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: Janice Palmer Lorna Krawchuk THAT the following meeting dates be approved; THAT the Watershed Council hold its meetings within the watershed whenever possible; AND FURTHER THAT meetings be held at various locations throughout the watershed. CARRIED DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL MEETING # DATE MEETING LOCATION 9/02 Thurs., OCTOBER 17, 2002 ST. PAUL'S ANGLICAN CHURCH 10/02 Thurs., NOVEMBER 21, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 11/02 Thurs., DECEMBER 19, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 PROJECTS & STEWARDSHIP TEAM MEETING DATE LOCATION #8/02 Thursday October 24, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #4 #9/02 Thursday November 28, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 September 19, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 F90 POLICY & ADVOCACY TEAM MEETING 1 DATE #7/02 Thursday November 14, 2002 I LOCATION NYCC Ctee Rm. #4 EDUCATION & OUTREACH MEETING 1 DATE 1 LOCATION #5102 Thursday November 7, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #5 COMMITTEE REPORTS /UPDATES /PRESENTATIONS RES. #F77/02 - COMMITTEE REPORTS Moved by: Seconded by: Stephen Cockle Geoffrey Cook THAT the draft minutes of meetings from the following teams, including specific recommendations as noted, be received and endorsed: POLICY AND ADVOCACY MEETING - Minutes of Meeting #5/02, held September 12, 2002 CARRIED. RES. #78/02 - FORMER MNR LANDS MASTER PLAN AND SITE WALK Moved by: Seconded by: Paula Davies Margaret Buchinger THAT Mark Wilson, Margaret Casey and Stephen Cockle attend the site walk and Masterplan review meeting on September 24th commencing at 5:30 pm. AND FURTHER THAT the appointed members report back to the Don Council at Meeting #9/02 on October 17, 2002. CARRIED WM rg F91 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8102 September 19, 2002 BACKGROUND The City of Vaughan approved the Maple Valley Plan in June of 2000. One of the implementation requirements of the Plan is the preparation of-a Masterplan for the former MNR lands on Dufferin Street. These lands are identified in the Maple Valley Plan "to focus primarily on the vision of ecological preservation, conservation, passive recreation and community use." The City of Vaughan has commenced the preparation of the Masterplan for the City's MNR lands, located on the east side of Dufferin Street, north of Major Mackenzie Drive. In addition, the lands on the west side of Dufferin Street immediately south of the Teston Road road alignment have been included in the Masterplan area. A site walk and review is planned on September 24th commencing at 5:30 p.m. The walk will be rain or shine and will last approximately 1 1/2 hours. It is recommended that you wear hiking /heavy walking footwear; bring rain gear; mosquito repellent and a beverage for the walk. Following the walk, a Tight meal will be provided in concert with a meeting to discuss the site features and preferred plan options. Please confirm your attendance with Renata Fabbro at (905) 303 -2069, ext. 3211 by Thursday, September 19th. Report prepared by: Jennifer Bamford, ext. 5305 For information contact: Adele Freeman, ext. 5238 Date: September 11, 2002 UPDATES FROM OTHER GROUPS WITHIN THE DON WATERSHED Task Force to Bring Back the Don • Safety concerns at Riverside Park (east and west) have been acted upon. Lighting was installed and lower limbs (where applicable) were removed. • Started the reduced mowing program along the Don Valley Parkway. There is still a problem with the Parks Dept. mowing planting sites - it just happened at Moore Ave. • Vandalism of planting sites is a problem and seems to be where sites are the most accessible. One possible solution is to plant thorny plants, i.e., hawthorns to deter the problem. Another solution will be to try planting sites int more inaccessible areas. • Riverdale Park East wet meadow design has a few flaws and the Task Force is working with TRCA on it. • There is a need to educate the funders to also give money towards the maintenance of planting sites not just new planting events. wM s1 September 19, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 F92 • The Task Force is thinking about their future focus: policy, more planting programs, focusing on a maintenance program, placing their emphasis where can they be more effective. Friends of the Don East Saturday, September 21, 10 am: Guided walk of Crothers Woods, Leaside (re- scheduled Walk leaders are Garth Armour and Keri McMahon of the City Parks and Recreation department. Meet at 10 am at the corner of Millwood Road and Redway Road. Organized by Friends of the Don East. Call 416- 466 -9153 for more info Saturday, October 5, 10 am - noon: Tree Planting in Warden Woods Meet at 10 am at the north entrance to the park, at the corner of Warden Ave. and St. Clair, across from the Warden Subway Station. Call 416 - 466 -9153 for more info. Toronto Bay Initiative Sunday, September 29, 10:00 am to 1:00 pm Toronto Island Tree Planting and Shoreline Restoration Part of Toronto Bay Initiative's and the City of Toronto's ongoing Toronto Islands naturalization. Help plant trees and shrubs along the shoreline to create fish and wildlife habitat, improve water quality and reduce erosion. Meet outside the ferry terminal gates (city side) at 10:00 am, for the 10:15 ferry. Please call Toronto Bay Initiative to register (416- 943 -8080 ext. 227) or e -mail info @torontobay.net. Free. Sunday September 29, 10:00 am to 12:00 noon Water in the City Walk Learn about the water flowing through the city's underground sewer system, the effects of stormwater on our lake and rivers, and what you can do to be part of the solution. Meet outside the Chester Subway station. Hosted by the RiverSides Stewardship Alliance. There is no charge for this event. Please call (416) 392 -1983 to register, or e-mail riversidesPriversides.orq. Free. Toronto Island Sand Dune Restoration Sunday, September 29, 10:00 to 1:00 pm Participate in ongoing efforts to restore the sand dunes at Hanlan's Point. These dunes -- the only ones in Toronto -- are beautiful, rare and fragile. Come plant trees, shrubs, and grasses and learn about these unique plant communities. Meet outside the ferry terminal gates (city side) at 10:00 am for the 10:15 am ferry. Please call or e- mail TBI to register. Free. This event is offered in partnership with the City of Toronto. F93 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #8/02 September 19, 2002 ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9.30 p.m., on September 19, 2002 Mark Wilson Chair /jb Craig Mather CAO; Secretary Treasurer TRCA THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #9/02 October 17, 2002 Page F94 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #9/02, was held in the Burgundy Room at the North York Memorial Hall, 5110 Yonge Street, in the City of Toronto, on Thursday, October 17, 2002. Don Cross, Vice - Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT Barbara Anderson Member Margaret Buchinger Member Margaret Casey Co- Vice -Chair Stephen Cockle Member Geoffrey Cook Member Don Cross Co- Vice -Chair Paula Davies Member Laurian Farrell Member Brendan Flanagan Alternate Member Phil Goodwin Member Moyra Haney Member Peter Heinz Member Deb Martin -Downs Member Doug Obright Member Mel Plewes Member Michael White Member GUEST Elsie Petch Richmond Hill Field Naturalists Bobby Venizelos Lake Ontario Keeper - Student STAFF Adele Freeman Don /Highland Watershed Specialist Greg Sadowski Bartley Smith Greenway Coordinator Amy Thurston Don Watershed Technical Assistant Lisa Turnbull Team Facilitator tia-192. F95 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #9/02 October 17, 2002 • RES. #79/02 - MINUTES OF MEETING #8/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Paula Davies Moyra Haney THAT the minutes of Meeting #8/02, held on September 19, 2002 be approved . CARRIED INFORMATION 4.1 Letter to Paul Bedford, City of Toronto, dated August 19, 2002 from Don McLean, Executive Director, Friends of the Don East 4.2 Letter to Paul Bedford, City of Toronto, dated September 25, 2002 from John Wilson, Chair, Task Force to Bring Back the Don RES. #F80/02 - INFORMATION Moved by: Seconded by: Peter Heinz Margaret Buchinger THAT Information Items 4.1 and 4.2 Inclusive, be received CARRIED PRESENTATION RES. #F81/02 - BARTLEY SMITH GREENWAY UPDATE Moved by: Phil Goodwin Seconded by: Stephen Cockle THAT Greg Sadowski be thanked for his presentation on the Bartley Smith Greenway project; AND FURTHER THAT the contribution by Anne Bartley Smith be highlighted in a future issue of the On the Don. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Vaughan Chamber of Commerce received a $250,000 grant for the Bartley Smith project from Trillium for the next 5 years. Greg Sadowski was hired as the Stewardship Coordinator through that grant and through a Vaughan Chamber of Commerce/TRCA agreement. Activities so far w r113 October 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #9/02 F96 include: Headwaters activities have been minimal. Working with Vaughan to get trail through the Mackenzie Glen area. Ruperts Pond: pedestrian bridge being built, naturalizing channels, stormwater ponds being naturalized, potential for opening on Earth Day 2003. Tudor Valley: (Keele & Rutherford) Working with landscape architects in order to move forward in this area. Trying to determine trail alignment. North of Langstaff: Good clews on linking north to south - Region has in their 2003 plan to install a traffic light which will link the northern section of BSG to the southern section. Ecopark: Continue with Business Outreach program here with more plantings, more rehabilitation and habitat work Hydro Corridor: Have had 2 planting events here. The final payment of $150,000 including taxes from the Bartley estate has been received. It was suggested that we should highlight contributions by Anne Bartley Smith in the On the Don newsletter. It is possible that not everyone knows the amazing contributions she has made. Greg will be attending and participating in the Projects and Stewardship Team meetings every few months. He is also an expert birder and is more than happy to assist with birding projects or any other projects within the City of Vaughan area. You can contact Greg at 416- 661 -6600, ext. 5668 POLICY ISSUES RES. #F82/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: TESTON ROAD EXTENSION LETTER Margaret Casey Margaret Buchinger THAT the letter on the proposed Teston Road Extension be sent from Mark Wilson, Chair, to Mr. Peter Cholewa, Region of York, with the comments and recommendations of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council; AND FURTHER THAT copies of this letter be sent to the Mayors of the Regional Municipality of York and the City of Vaughan; the York Regional Councillors appointed to the Don Council; the City of Vaughan Councillors appointed to the Don Council; Ian Buchanan, Regional Forester for York Region; and Michael Williams, Director of the Environmental Assessment & Approvals Branch of the Ministry of the Environment. CARRIED F97 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #9/02 October 17, 2002 BACKGROUND The following letter is to be sent to Peter Cholewa, Project Manager, Regional Municipality of York. theDon DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL October 16, 2002 Mr. Peter Cholewa Project Manager Transportation and Works Regional Municipality of York 17250 Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1 Dear Mr. Cholewa: Re: Teston Road Class Environmental Assessment On June 10, 2002, members of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council attended a Public Information Centre for the Teston Road Environmental Assessment. Three of our members participated in a site visit with you and your colleagues on September 10, 2002. On September 19, 2002, you and a member of your consulting team attended a meeting of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council to provide us with more information on the project. We thank you for taking time to meet with us. As you noted in your review of the background conditions of concern to the Don Watershed Regeneration Council, the headwaters of the East Don River and the McGill Environmentally Significant Area and the Area of Natural and Scientific Interest occur in the area of the proposed Teston Road extension to the west of Dufferin Street. As well, the proposed extension crosses the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan area as defined in Ontario Regulation 01 / 02, 2002. The Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP) was registered as Ontario Regulation 140 / 02 on April 22, 2002. In the Introduction, it states that "Municipal planning decisions shall also conform with this Plan, which takes precedence over municipal official plans." The Regional Municipality is to bring the municipal official plan into conformance with the ORMCP by April 23, 2003. The Don Watershed Regeneration Council has as its mandate to: 1. Protect what is healthy; 2. Regenerate what is degraded; and 3. Take Responsibility for the Don River and watershed We take our guidance from `Forty Steps to a New Don" (Don Watershed Task Force and MTRCA 1994) when we participate in projects and policy issues. We like to be proactive and work with proponents to obtain outcomes that are consistent with our objectives for the Don watershed. As a result of our meetings and review, we offer the following preliminary comments: Relevant Sections of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP) 1. According to the ORMCP, the area of the proposed crossing of the tributary of the East Don River is designated a "natural core area ". The purpose of the designation is set out in Section 11(1): "The purpose of Natural Core Areas is to maintain and where possible improve or restore - the ecological integrity of the Plan Area by: wino s-- October 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #9/02 F98 (a) maintaining, and where possible improving or restoring, the health, diversity, size, and connectivity of key natural heritage features, hydrologically sensitive features and the related ecological functions; (b) maintaining or restoring natural self- sustaining vegetation and wildlife habitat; (c) maintaining the quantity and quality of groundwater and surface water; (d) maintaining groundwater recharge; (e) maintaining natural stream form and flow characteristics; and (f) protecting landform features. (2) Natural Core Areas also have the objectives of: (a) accommodating a trail system through the Plan Area and trail connections to it; and (b) providing for limited economic development that is compatible with clause (a) and subsection (1). (3) The following uses are permitted with respect to land in Natural Core Areas, subject to Parts III and IV: 1. Fish, wildlife and forest management. 2. Conservation projects and flood and erosion control projects. 3. Agricultural uses. 4. Transportation, infrastructure, and utilities as described in section 41, buton /y if the need for the project has been demonstrated and there is no reasonab /e alternative. (italics added for emphasis) 5. Home businesses. 6. Home industries. 7. Bed and breakfast establishments. 8. Farm vacation homes. 9. Low - intensity recreational uses as described in section 37. 10. Unserviced parks. 11. Uses accessory to the uses set out in paragraphs 1 to 10." 2. According to the ORMCP, the area of the proposed crossing of this tributary of the East Don River (a permanent stream) is considered a hydrologically sensitive feature. The ORMCP prohibits all development in a hydrologically sensitive area, Section 26(2) `:4/fdevelopment and site alteration with respectto /and within a hydrologicallysensitive feature orthe relatedmin /mum vegetation protection zone is prohibited, except the following; 1. Forest, fish, and wildlife management. 2. Conservation and flood or erosion control projects, but only if they are determined to be necessary in the public interest after all alternatives have been considered. 3. Transportation, infrastructure, and utilities as described in section 41, but only if the need for the project has been demonstrated and there is no reasonable alternative." 3. After the need has been proven, a proponent is required to prepare an evaluation, Section 26 (3) "(3) An application for development or site alteration with respect to /and within the minimum area of influence that relates toa hydrologically sensitive feature, but outside the hydrologically sensitive feature itself and the related minimum vegetation protection zone, sha / /be accompanied by a hydrological evaluation under subsection (4). (4) A hydrological evaluation sha //, (a) demonstrate that the development or site alteration will have no adverse effects on the hydrologically sensitive feature or on the related hydrological functions; (b) identify planning, design and construction practices that will maintain, and where possible improve or restore, the health, diversity and size of the hydrologically sensitive feature; and (c) determine whether the minimum vegetation protection zone whose dimensions are specified in the Tab /e to this Partfs sufficient, and it' it /fl 1 F99 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #9/02 October 17, 2002 is not sufficient, specify the dimensions of the requ /red minimum vegetation protection zone and provide for the maintenance and, where possible, improvement or restoration of natural se /f- sustaining vegetation within It" 4. Section 41 (5) provides that `Transportation, infrastructure, and utilities uses may be permitted to cross a key natural heritage feature or a hydrolog ica lly sensitive feature if the applicant demonstrates that, (a) the need for the project has been demonstrated and there is no reasonable alternative; (b) the planning, design and construction practices adopted will keep any adverse effects on the ecologica /integrity of the P /an Area to a minimum; (c) the design practices adopted will maintain, and where possible improve or restore, key ecological and recreationa//inkages, including the trail system referred to in section 39; (d) the landscape design will adapted to the circumstances of the site and use native plant species as much as possible, especially along rights of way; and (e) the long -term landscape management approaches adopted will maintain, and where possible improve or restore, the health, diversity, size and connectivity of the key natural heritage feature or hydrologically sensitive feature. Don Watershed Regeneration Council Recommendations 1. All reasonable alternatives and options need to be identified such as the Kirby Road extension, which will require the construction of an interchange at Highway 400. Only one option for crossing the tributary of the East Don was presented to the Don Watershed Regeneration Council, although the option had two westerly approach alignments to avoid the landfills. We do not believe that this is an acceptable set of alternatives given the significance and sensitivity of the ESA as well as its designation as Natural Core Area within the ORMCP. 2. A transparent and detailed evaluation of all relevant alternatives and options should be undertaken. Several environmental factors; including Toss of core areas, impacts to wildlife habitat and species, impacts to linkage functions and connectivity, and alteration of surface and ground water quality should be evaluated. The "do nothing option" should be analyzed with more than passing consideration. While cost to construct the alignment is no doubt a factor, it should receive weight equal to or less than the costs of environmental effects. The cost of environmental mitigation and compensation measures should be included in the cost evaluation of each option. We would expect extraordinary mitigation and rehabilitation measures to be required where impacts to soils, water, vegetation and habitat are predicted and cannot be avoided. Storm water management, including winter maintenance without the use of road salts, should be incorporated into the drainage design for the road. 3. The McGill ESA is the last remaining large block of forest in the Don watershed. It contains numerous rare plants and sensitive animals. All options being considered for the road extension should avoid bisecting the ESA. There have been numerous intrusions into this ESA and in our opinion, it cannot tolerate more fragmentation. 4. The Class EA should ensure that the natural environment inventory undertaken is sufficient to address the requirements of the ORMCP in the description of the vegetation units, plant species, wildlife species and wildlife habitats. It was unfortunate that your Environmental Consultant was unable to attend the Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting on September 19 to describe the studies undertaken so far. We would appreciate being copied on an existing conditions report or summary when it becomes available. Will "7 October 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #9/02 F100 Conclusion In conclusion, as municipal planning decisions must conform to the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, we believe that the provision of the information noted above to satisfy the ORMCP would require more extensive studies, review and analyses of all relevant alternatives and options. As the ORMCP takes precedence over all municipal instruments, a much longer period of time is required to prepare the studies and documentation for the proposed alignment for consideration under the provisions of the Municipal Class EA process. The Class EA study and consultation period should be extended for the period of time necessary to permit the Official Plan conformity exercises related to the ORMCP for the Regional Municipality of York and the Town of Vaughan to be completed and for all supporting studies and analyses to be documented. We would appreciate an early indication of the direction that the Regional Municipality will take in order to assess our position. We would be pleased to meet again with you and your consultants to explore other matters or to review data or reports. Yours very truly, Original signed by: Mark Wilson Chair Don Watershed Regeneration Council MP:jb cc: Mayor Michael Di Biase, City of Vaughan Councillor Susan Kadis, City of Vaughan Councillor Mario Racco, City of Vaughan Mayor Don Cousens, Regional Municipality of York Regional Councillor Brenda Hogg Regional Councillor Joyce Frustaglio, Regional Municipality of York Ian Buchanan, Regional Forester, Regional Municipality of York Michael Williams, Director Environmental Assessment & Approvals Branch - MOE ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES RES. #F83/02 - MEETING DATES FOR DON COUNCIL AND TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: Deb Martin -Downs Paula Davies THAT the following meeting dates be approved; THAT the Watershed Council hold its meetings within the watershed whenever possible; AND FURTHER THAT meetings be held at various locations throughout the watershed. CARRIED WVl1i F101 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #9/02 October 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL MEETING # - DATE MEETING LOCATION 10/02 Thurs., NOVEMBER 21, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 2 11/02 Thurs., DECEMBER 19, 2002 NYCC COMM. RM. 1 TSi &;STE ARDSHI,P TEAM MEETING 1 DATE #9/02 1 Thursday November 28, 2002 I LOCATION NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 COMMITTEE REPORTS /UPDATES /PRESENTATIONS RES. #F84/02 - COMMITTEE REPORTS Moved by: Seconded by: Phil Goodwin Margaret Casey THAT the draft minutes of meetings from the following teams, including specific recommendations as noted, be received and endorsed: PROJECTS AND STEWARDSHIP TEAM - Minutes of Meeting #6/02, held on September 26, 2002 POLICY AND ADVOCACY TEAM - Minutes of Meeting #6/02, held on October 10, 2002 CARRIED RES. #88/02 - UPDATE FROM MNR LANDS SITE MEETING Report from Stephen Cockle, dated October 9, 2002 Moved by: Seconded by: Mel Plewes Peter Heinz THAT Stephen Cockle's report be received CARRIED 141111 October 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #9/02 F102 BACKGROUND The following report was sent to the Don Council from Stephen Cockle in regards to the Site Walk and Master Plan meeting in regards to the former MNR lands Email sent on October 09, 2002 For the Don Watershed Regeneration Council: As agreed, I attended the Master Plan Meeting and Site walk at the former MNR lands on Dufferin Street on 24 September on behalf of the Don Council. Adele missed the walk but arrived in time for the discussion (and 'light meal') afterwards. Only a handful of people turned out and the presentation didn't materialize because the person who was supposed to do this couldn't make it. Adele suggested to the City of Vaughan hosts that the Don Council would be interested in seeing this presentation at an upcoming meeting. Although the City of Vaughan has started on a master plan for this site, not too much has happened yet. The city is only in an early phase of establishing some baseline information and gathering ideas on what to do with the site. There appears to be only a minimal budget for this. Gartner Lee (Brian Henshaw) has done a small ecological study. Harvey Anderson, a retired MNR tree scientist who used to work at the site, is a consultant. A background report is expected in a few weeks, and a public meeting will likely be called this fall, then a draft proposal taken to Vaughan Council in 01 2003. No real money will be available to do anything on the site until development charges start accruing in 2006 from the approved residential development to the east. Since this money will come in over a period of up to ten years, the City is thinking in terms of a phased plan over a similar period of time. The broad -brush concept calls for conservation, passive recreation, and education /interpretation. In fact a summer camp programme for kids has already been in operation for two or three years, and will presumably continue to be an integral part of future plans. A system of public trails, with a linkage to Maple, is envisaged, where possible making use of existing MNR roads and tracks. However, public access into the natural area in the valley, containing mature forest and an ESA, will likely be restricted to interpretive activities. It's important to remember that this was a forestry station, not a conservation area The site participated in MNR's programme on fast growing aspen and poplar cultivars for biomass, so sections of the upland forest are in effect overgrown tree plantations where the natural ecology has been significantly disturbed. These plantations are now steadily deteriorating through lack of active management. Most of the trees have become larger than originally intended and some are now dying off. Nonetheless this is still a potentially useful resource for tree seeds, and apparently inquiries still come in from around the world. So one of the big questions is what to do with the tree plantations. Should a partner, such as university forestry department, be sought to assist in seriously managing these plantations, should they be managed by the City or the Region for demonstration purposes, or should nature be allowed to take its course? These options all provide an interpretive opportunity to offer to Vaughan residents. The site hasn't really been touched since the MNR left. All the buildings and sheds remain intact. An idea has been floated to demolish one complex of buildings in the valley to create a site for an educational forest regeneration project. However, not much is known right now about what is in or under these buildings and the associated pavement (one building contains a load of ground core samples). The pump house that used to provide water for the fish hatchery is still in operation and will be used to provide water for the Eagle's Nest golf course across Dufferin Street. A storm water management system will be required just beyond the boundary on the east side to handle runoff from the residential development. The administration buildings on Dufferin Street are in good shape, and the City would like to have some sort of focus for them, e.g. a corporate training centre, with the site as a whole being available for outdoor 'team- building' activities. Actually, the City seems to be pretty keen on the idea of establishing income - generating activities on the site that are consistent with the basic concept of conservation, passive recreation and education /interpretation. Right now the MNR site has the feeling of a retreat away from it all (well, it does if you can ignore the traffic roar on Dufferin Street), and the City of Vaughan is offering a great opportunity to conserve it. However, one WMIDO F103 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #9102 October 17, 2002 has to remember that ultimately it will be an island, a city park with residential and commercial development on three sides and a golf course on the fourth. Stephen Cockle Member Don Watershed Regeneration Council UPDATES FROM OTHER GROUPS WITHIN THE DON WATERSHED Task Force to Bring Back the Don Members were directed to check their website at: http: / /city.toronto.ca/don Friends of the Don East The Annual General Meeting is taking place on Sunday, November 17th at Todmorden Mills Museum at Pottery Road between Bayview and Broadview Avenue. Please note the following times: 6 pm - Potluck; 7 pm - Awards and Business.; 8 pm - Dr. Andy Kenney, Guest Speaker - "Protecting Our Urban Forest." Key items that will be discussed at the meeting: changes in membership, an amendment to Bylaw 1; search for interested residents. Successful programs for FODE have been Trees Count and Another Yard for the Don . There is a need more people to manage these programs. For more information on the meeting, their newsletters and events go to: http://www.web.ca.—fode/ Toronto Bay Initiative Members were directed to check their website at: http: / /www.torontobay.net NEW BUSINESS OMB - Rizmi Holdings Pre - hearing The pre- hearing begins Monday, November 4th. TRCA will have a staff person there who will keep the Council updated. Glendon Forest - TD Friends of the Environment provided funding for plantings. The last of the planting events is on October 26th. wnIol October 17, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #9/02 F104 City of Vaughan Woodlot Survey The woodlot at Jane and Rutherford is an indirect subject of an OMB hearing taking place on October 28th. Information /update to follow at a later Council meeting. Region of York OP - Public Meeting November 30/02. meeting. Charles Sauriol Dinner More information /update to follow at a later Council As some of the Don Council members had not yet received an invitation to the Charles Sauriol Dinner for November 14th, Jennifer was asked to email any information to the whole Don Council. A "Don Council" table will be reserved for the evening. Combined Sewer Outfall Public Meeting Jennifer was asked to send an email to all Don Council members to remind them of the Wet Weather Flow CSO Public Meeting on Monday, October 28, 2002. ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 7.00 p.m., on October 17, 2002 Mark Wilson Chair /jb Craig Mather CAO; Secretary Treasurer TRCA th■ eirTHE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 November 21, 2002 Page F105 The Don Watershed Regeneration Council Meeting #10/02, was held in the Committee Room at the North York Civic Centre, 5100 Yonge Street, in the City of Toronto, on Thursday, November 21, 2002. Mark Wilson, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT Margaret Casey Co- Vice -Chair Don Cross Co- Vice -Chair Phil Goodwin Member Moyra Haney Member Peter Heinz Member Deb Martin -Downs Member Andrew McCammon Member Doug Obright Member Mel Plewes Member Janice Palmer Member Michael White Member Mark Wilson Chair GUEST Ian Buchanan Regional Forester, Region of York STAFF Adele Freeman Don /Highland Watershed Specialist Amy Thurston Don Watershed Technical Assistant Kathy Stranks Executive Assistant, TRCA RES. #89/02 - MINUTES OF MEETING #9/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Moyra Haney Don Cross THAT the minutes of Meeting #9/02 held on October 17, 2002 be approved CARRIED wMl03 November 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 F106 • CORRESPONDENCE 3.1 Letter to Mel Plewes, Chair of the Policy and Advocacy Committee, dated October 24, 2002 from The Honourable David Anderson, Minister of the Environment in regards to road salts. RES. #F90/02 - CORRESPONDENCE Moved by: Seconded by: Moyra Haney Don Cross THAT Correspondence Item 3.1, be received CARRIED INFORMATION 4.1 Letter to Karen Antonio - Hadcock, Community Planning Dept , City of Vaughan dated October 31, 2002 regarding City of Vaughan Woodlot Functional Assessment Study 4.2 Staff Report to Executive Committee Meeting #10/02 on November 1, 2002, entitled "Rizmi Holdings Limited Aggregate Application and Ontario Municipal Board Appeals" 4.3 Letter to Chair Brad Duguid and Members, Works Committee, City of Toronto dated November 6, 2002, regarding the "Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan" 4.4 Letter to Councillor Brad Duguid, Chair of the Works Committee, City of Toronto, dated November 12, 2002, regarding "Picking Out Litter Hotspots" RES. #F91/02 - INFORMATION Moved by: Seconded by: THAT Information Items 4.1 to 4.4 be received CARRIED AMENDMENT RES. #92/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: THAT the letter to Paul Bedford, dated November 18, 2002 regarding the Proposed Extension of F107 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 November 21, 2002 Redway Road be included in these minutes CARRIED November 18, 2002 Mr. Paul Bedford Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning City of Toronto 22nd Floor, Station 1220 Metro Hall, 55 John Street Toronto, ON M5V 3C6 Dear Mr. Bedford: RE: PROPOSED EXTENSION OF REDWAY ROAD We would like to begin by congratulating you on the development of the City's new Official Plan and on the many excellent features of this Plan which appear to make it the most forward - looking document of its kind in our City's history. Increasing Toronto's population through well planned and designed developments is the key to maintaining the economic, social and environmental well being of our City and region. However, the Don Watershed Regeneration Council wishes to advise you in the clearest terms of our objection to the designation of an extension of Redway Road from Millwood Road to Bayview Avenue as a "planned but unbuilt road" under the draft Toronto Official Plan. In the old Metro Official Plan, after lengthy debate, this road was formally "deferred" by the Metro Council. We are concerned that this designation has been made without adequate consultation on its environmental implications and without proper consideration of the environmental priorities of the draft Official Plan. Other reasonable measures to address the alleged need for this road, such as traffic calming now being implemented in South Leaside can do much to relieve residents' concerns about traffic infiltration in this area. We have strong concerns that the proposed road would draw significantly more traffic to South Leaside. We also note that the Toronto Plan report, "Reducing Car Dependence ", cites the attributes of a transportation vision for Toronto which include "safeguards for the protection of the natural environment ". However, it then goes on to propose that a Redway Road extension be used for a busway. This link appears also to be proposed in the draft Official Plan as a "higher order transit corridor" (Map 4). We understand that consideration is now being given to establishing both a two lane road and a two lane dedicated busway for this route. This proposal, like the Redway Road extension proposal, does not appear to reflect either adequate consultation with respect to the environmental consequences of this development or adequate consideration of the environmental priorities of the draft Official Plan. November 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 F108 As we are sure you are aware, the alignment of this "planned but unbuilt road" would necessarily lead to disruption and damage to the Don valley, particularly to the designated Environmentally Sensitive Area of Crothers Woods. The Don Valley is a unique natural environment feature of the eastern part of the City. Roads and built areas can never replicate the unique sense of place and community which this feature gives to residents of the City. With the aid of thousands of volunteers and residents and the commitment and resources of the City and its staff, the Valley is slowly being rehabilitated after over a hundred years of abuse and neglect. We urge you to ensure that the Valley is protected from these damaging incursions and preserved as an environmental asset for the future citizens of Toronto. We also note that the Toronto Region Conservation Authority policies in the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program speak directly to the issue of roadways within valley corridors: "Section 4:3 Infrastructure and Servicing: A. The following type and extent of services may be permitted within valley and stream corridors. 1) New transportation corridors and above - ground utility corridors shall not be routed within valley and stream corridors; however, they may be permitted to cross valley and stream corridors." We urge you to reconsider the designation of Redway Road as a "planned but unbuilt road" and to withdraw the proposed alignment of a busway along this route. Thank you for considering these concerns. Yours truly, Origin / signed by. Mark Wilson Chair Don Watershed Regeneration Council cc: Councillor Gerry Altobello, Chair, Transportation and Planning Committee Councillor Joe Pantalone, Tree Advocate Councillor Jane Pitfield, DON VALLEY WEST F109 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 November 21, 2002 PRESENTATION Ian Buchanan, Regional Forester for the Regional Municipality of York spoke to the Don Council on the "Greening of York Region Initiative ". This program is RES. #F93/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: THAT Ian Buchanan, Regional Forester of the Regional Municipality of York be thanked for his presentation on the Greening York Region Initiative; CARRIED BACKGROUND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES RES. #F94/02 - MEETING DATES FOR DON COUNCIL AND TEAMS I Moved by: Seconded by: THAT the following meeting dates be approved; THAT the Watershed Council hold its meetings within the watershed whenever possible; AND FURTHER THAT meetings be held at various locations throughout the watershed. AMENDMENT RES. #F95/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: Moyra Haney Don Ross CARRIED THAT Don Council Meeting #11/02 to take place on December 19th be cancelled. CARRIED 0110/7 November 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 F110 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL MEETING # DATE MEETING LOCATION 11/02 Thurs., DECEMBER 19, 2002 CANCELLED PROJECTS & STEWARDSHIP TEAM MEETING 1 DATE 1 LOCATION #9/02 Thursday November 28, 2002 NYCC Ctee Rm. #1 RES. #F95/02 - TENTATIVE 2003 MEETING DATES FOR DON COUNCIL AND WORKING TEAMS Moved by: Seconded by: THAT the following meeting dates be approved; THAT the Don Watershed Council hold its meetings within the watershed whenever possible; AND FURTHER THAT meetings be held at various locations throughout the watershed. AMENDMENT RES. #F96/02 - THAT the Don Council Meeting #11/03 be held on December 11, 2003; AND FURTHER THAT the location of meeting #11/03 be changed to the Black Creek Pioneer Village. CARRIED. Wri 1o8 F111 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 November 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL MEETING # DATE MEETING LOCATION #1/03 Thurs., JANUARY 16, 2003 COMM. RM. 1 NY CIVIC CENTRE #2/03 Thurs., FEBRUARY 20, 2003 COMM. RM. 1 NY CIVIC CENTRE #3/03 Thurs., MARCH 20, 2003 COMM. RM. 1 NY CIVIC CENTRE #4/03 Thurs., APRIL 17, 2003 COMM. RM. 1 NY CIVIC CENTRE #5/03 Thurs., MAY 15, 2003 COMM. RM. 1 NY CIVIC CENTRE #6/03 Thurs., JUNE 19, 2003 COMM. RM. 1 NY CIVIC CENTRE #7/03 Thurs., JULY 17, 2003 COMM. RM. 1 NY CIVIC CENTRE #8/03 Thurs., SEPTEMBER 18, 2003 COMM. RM. 1 NY CIVIC CENTRE #9/03 Thurs., OCTOBER 16, 2003 COMM. RM.' 1 NY CIVIC CENTRE #10/03 Thurs., NOVEMBER 20, 2003 COMM. RM. 1 NY CIVIC CENTRE #11/03 Amended to Thurs., DECEMBER 11, 2003 BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE PROJECTS & STEWARDSHIP TEAM MEETING DATE LOCATION #1/03 Thursday January 30, 2003 TBD #2/03 Thursday February 27, 2003 TBD #3/03 Thursday March 27, 2003 TBD #4/03 Thursday April 24, 2003 TBD #5/03 Thursday May 29, 2003 TBD #6/03 Thursday June 26, 2003 TBD #7/03 Thursday July 24, 2003 TBD #8/03 Thursday September 25, 2003 TBD #9/03 Thursday October 23, 2003 TBD #10/03 Thursday November 27, 2003 TBD WrtlOct November 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 F112 POLICY &_ADVOCACY TEAM MEETING DATE - LOCATION #1/03 Thursday January 23, 2003 TBD #2/03 Thursday March 6, 2003 TBD #3/03 Thursday May 8, 2003 TBD #4103 Thursday July 10, 2003 TBD #5/03 Thursday September 11, 2003 TBD #6/03 Thursday November 6, 2003 TBD EDUCATION & OUTREACH MEETING DATE LOCATION #1103 Thursday January 9, 2003 TBD #2/03 Thursday February 6, 2003 TBD #3/03 Thursday April 3, 2003 TBD #4/03 Thursday June 5, 2003 TBD #5/03 Thursday October 2, 2003 TBD BACKGROUND The meeting schedule above has been designed for the fewest possible conflicts with Municipal Council meetings. RES. #F97/02- 10th ANNIVERSARY OF DON COUNCIL/TASK FORCE THAT the various suggestions from the Education Committee and from the Don Council meeting tonight be combined and brought forward to the Don Council Agenda in January AND FURTHER THAT a Committee be formed comprising of the Education Committee and any other interested Don Council member to organize the Anniversary. WO ft° F113 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 November 21, 2002 BACKGROUND The celebration of the Don Council's 10 th year will take place over the whole of the year. Various suggestions from the Don Council were given including: • Sugaring -off Event Don Volunteer Beer Bash at the Brick Works on the Saturday of the Paddle the Don. Invitations would be sent and include: - the various Don watershed groups, e.g. FODE, TFTBBTD - municipal and regional councillors Golf Tournament - have the four Don watershed golf courses present their water - taking initiative RES. #F98/02 - DONATIONS FROM "PADDLE THE DON" Moved by: Seconded by: THAT the Projects and Stewardship Committee discuss the donations at their next meeting and bring forward their suggestions to the next Don Council meeting. CARRIED Participants at the Paddle the Don event were told that the donations were going towards restoration projects. Restoration project sites to be discussed with our watershed groups including the Task Force and FODE. Ideas for items to be given out at the Paddle event were discussed The items included sweatshirts, t- shirts, blankets, and banners. RES. #F99/02 - JOINT MEETING OF DWRC, TFTBBTD AND FODE - December 4, 2002 Lura Consulting is coordinating a meeting in regards to the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization: Don Issues and EA process. It will take place on December 4, 2002 beginning at 7 pm at Metro Hall. An agenda will be sent out prior to the meeting and Minutes will be distributed at a later date. wrt jIl November 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 F114 COMMITTEE REPORTS /UPDATES /PRESENTATIONS RES. #F99/02 - COMMITTEE REPORTS Moved by: Seconded by: THAT the draft minutes of meetings from the following teams, including specific recommendations as noted, be received and endorsed: PROJECTS AND STEWARDSHIP TEAM • Minutes of Meeting #7/02, held on October 24, 2002 POLICY & ADVOCACY TEAM • Minutes of Meeting #7/02, held on November 14, 2002 EDUCATION & OUTREACH TEAM • Minutes of Meeting #5/02, held on November 7, 2002 RECOMMENDATION THAT the Chair of the Education and Outreach Team present their ideas for a 10`h anniversary celebration to the Don Council at the meeting scheduled for November 21', 2002; THAT the Education and Outreach Committee take ownership of planning the event; AND FURTHER THAT any other members interested in helping to plan this event should let Amy know in order to be included in all upcoming meetings. CARRIED UPDATES FROM OTHER GROUPS WITHIN THE DON WATERSHED Task Force to Bring Back the Don . The Task Force is hiring a consultant for the 5 year plan on aquatic and terrestrial items They are looking into trail bike problems in the Crothers Woods area and have consultant hired on contract. Redway Road expansion - formalized position with relationship to the road expansion in general. Information will be circulated to the Council via the Policy section of the Agenda. For more information Members were directed to check their website at: http: / /city.toronto.ca /don writ II Z F115 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 November 21, 2002 Friends of the Don East • FODE had its 9th Annual General Meeting • Andrew McCammon was elected Chair • Members have been given specific jobs to volunteer for • There will be a smaller Board to try to avoid micro- management • Tree Count program launched and will be main project of 2003 • Forming a Burke Brook Task Force • A group has been organized (Masscrest) to deal with Massey Taylor stewardship Toronto Bay Initiative • Moyra Haney is on the Committee Their office at Queen's Quay is closed as of Oct. 31/02; Please contact them through their website or their Coordinator Randee Holmes can be contacted at 416- 207 -8864. The office will be closed until March 31/03 Members were directed to check their website at: http: / /www.torontobay.net Richmond Hill Naturalists • All environmental parties have pulled out from the Board in th Richmond Hill Hearings • The Naturalists will still be a party at the OMB • Trying to focus on a getting a natural corridor across Yonge Street Toronto Liaison Council • Discussion of weeds causing navigation problems because of zebra mussels making water clear • Weed mat available in spring from Board of Health • Metro Marine Unit patrolling because of thefts at Yacht Clubs • Removing HMSC Haida was needed to open up channel • Roll -on, Roll -off boat from Toronto to Rochester - is E.A. going to be done? EDP • A metal worker volunteered to remove sculpture at Leslie Street • Cumber Mill Dam has been cleaned up • Richardson Farm sign going in, formalizing the project • Newbrook Creek path connecting the Don November 21, 2002 DON WATERSHED REGENERATION COUNCIL #10/02 F116 NEW BUSINESS • • Margaret Casey will host another Don Potluck Dinner, perhaps in February. Details to follow. Council would like a report back on the success of the watershed surveys in October. ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:30 p.m. Mark Wilson Chair /jb Craig Mather CAO; Secretary Treasurer TRCA wrliit StSC TORONTO AND REGION - .- onservation MINUTES OF THE JOINT DUFFINS AND CARRUTHERS CREEK WATERSHEDS TASK FORCES #1/02 January 9, 2002 Page JK1 The Duffins and Carruthers Creek Watersheds Task Forces met in Ajax Rotary Park on Wednesday, January 9, 2002. John Nemeth, Chair of the Duffins Creek Watershed Task Force, called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT Mayor Wayne Arthurs Member - Duffins Jane Brooke Member - Carruthers Neil Burnett Chair - Carruthers Mark Carroll Member - Duffins Doug Dodge Member - Duffins Jackie Fraser Member - Duffins Deanna Fry Member - Duffins Margie Kenedy Member - Duffins Paul Keubler Member - Carruthers Randy Low (alternate) Member - Duffins Gordon McKay Member - Carruthers Cindy Milton- Wilkie Member - Carruthers John Nemeth Chair - Duffins Susan Para Member - Duffins Judy Sullivan Member - Duffins Margaret Wells (alternate) Member - Duffins Tony Wong Member - Duffins Steven Yourt Member - Carruthers GUESTS Chris Darling Durham Region Bryan Howard Greensways Unlimited Inc Teresa Johnston Uxbridge Conservation Association Suzanne Murphy Uxbridge Conservation Association Tim Rance Ministry of Natural Resources Karen Wianecki Planning Solutions STAFF Mike Bender Landscape Architect Gary Bowen Watershed Specialist Cathy Crinnion Watershed Strategy Assistant Valerie Gust Administrative Assistant Sonya Meek Water Management Planner Lams' Jan. 9, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #1/02 JK2 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS J. Nemeth brought the meeting to order and asked participants to introduce themselves for the benefit of new members and guests. Thanks were also extended to the Town of Ajax for providing the Rotary Pavillion for the meeting. Councillor Low welcomed participants and provided a brief background on the Town's new facility. RES. #JK1 /02 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: N. Burnett P. Keubler THAT the Minutes of Meeting #03/01 be approved. CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE (a) Letter from Russel White, dated December 10, 2001 re: Permit Application to Construct a Pedestrian Trail, Duffins Creek between Highway 2 and Concession 3, Town of Ajax (b) Letter from John Nemeth, dated January 9, 2002 re: 2001 Conservation Easements RES. #JK2 /02 Moved by: Seconded by: M. Carroll S. Yourt THAT the above correspondence be received CARRIED INFORMATION Members were asked to review the following information items and forward any inquiries to G. Bowen or C. Crinnion of the TRCA. G. Bowen clarified that the launch of the State of the Watershed reports (SOW) would not be occurring at the Ajax Winterfest as mentioned in item (c). Instead, the reports would likely be launched at a separate event in March 2002 such as an evening Hoot n' Howl at the Ajax Rotary Pavillion. The SOW would mainly be available electronically via CD -ROM in .pdf format and available for download from municipal Websites and from the TRCA. Hard reference copies would also be available from local libraries and municipal offices. WON Jan. 9, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #1/02 JK3 (a) STEWARDSHIP EVENTS (b) STATE OF THE WATERSHED - FINAL DESIGN AND LAUNCH (c) AJAX WINTERFEST (d) AGRICULTURE CONSULTATION (e) OAK RIDGES MORAINE LEGISLATION (f) SEATON LANDS (g) LAND USE CHAPTER AND POLICY MATRIX RES. #JK3 /02 STRUCTURAL AND SAFETY SURVEY OF WHITEVALE DAM Moved by: Seconded by: D. Dodge M. Carroll THAT the report concerning the current structural conditions of the Whitevale Dam be received; AND FURTHER THAT the TRCA request the Ontario Realty Corporation to commission a structural and safety survey of the Whitevale Dam. AMENDMENT RES. #J K4/02 Moved by: Seconded by: STRUCTURAL AND SAFETY SURVEY OF WHITEVALE DAM D. Dodge M. Carroll THAT the report concerning the current structural conditions of the Whltevale Dam be received; AND THAT the TRCA request the Ontario Realty Corporation to commission a structural and safety survey of the Whitevale Dam; AND THAT copies of the letter of request be sent to MNR District Office, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, the City of Pickering, the Town of Ajax and the Region of Durham; AND FURTHER THAT the letter of request make specific reference to the section of the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act which clearly identifies the owner of the dam is responsible for structural and safety issues . THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED WAS CARRIED w j 1 r1 Jan. 9, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #1/02 JK4 BACKGROUND According to several TRCA staff, the Whitevale Dam has been in need of repair for quite some time. The Ontario Realty Corporation, the current owner of the dam, has not been able to raise the funds to correct the structural problems. One solution to the situation might be to replace the structure with one that is less obtrusive, but which still prevents non - native migratory fish from invading the upstream habitats. The informal historic and social importance of the dam within the hamlet will need to be taken into consideration. Whitevale Dam, West Duffins Creek, October 1994 RATIONALE The Whitevale Dam appears to be vulnerable to structural failure. The ramifications of such a failure could spell extensive ecological damage, including: • massive Toads of silt and clay suspended and settling in the lower reaches of West Duffins and the main stem downstream to the Duffins Marsh — loads that would damage aquatic habitat and constrict stream channels, potential for bank damage and downstream erosion caused by fast moving large woody debris which now rests in the silted channel above the dam, opening upstream tributaries to anadromous fish invasions, including sea lamprey, and Toss of brook trout stocks displaced by invading salmonids. Without some appreciation for the future of this structure, any fish management planning and the Duffins Creek Strategy are placed in jeopardy. FALL 2001 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES G. Bowen tabled Report 7.2 for discussion. It was determined that the Task Force would not go before Councils at this point, but wait until the completion of the next round of public consultation sessions scheduled for Spring 2002. It was also determined that a motion was not required at this time. WMI14 Jan. 9, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #1/02 JK5 RES. #JK5 /02- WORKPLAN Moved by: Seconded by: DRAFT WATERSHED STRATEGY DOCUMENT AND WRITER'S T. Wong R. Low THAT the writer's draft Watershed Strategy Document be received; AND THAT the Task Forces and appropriate TRCA staff review the draft Watershed Strategy Document and provide comments to Cathy Crinnion by January 25, 2002; AND THAT Cathy Crinnion coordinate comments on the draft Watershed Strategy Document and forward these to the writer; AND THAT these comments be incorporated by the writer and be forwarded to the Task Forces for approval at meeting #2/02; AND FURTHER THAT the writer's Workplan, spanning January to June of 2002, be approved. AMENDMENT RES. #JK6 /02- WORKPLAN Moved by: Seconded by: DRAFT WATERSHED STRATEGY DOCUMENT AND WRITER'S T. Wong R. Low THAT the writer's draft Watershed Strategy Document be received; AND THAT the review team as established by RES # ? ?/02 provide feedback on the draft Watershed Strategy Document to Cathy Crinnion for communication to the writer; AND THAT these comments be incorporated by the writer and be forwarded to the Task Forces for approval at meeting #2/02; AND FURTHER THAT the writer's Workplan, spanning January to June of 2002, be revised to coincide with the Technical Timelines presented by S. Meek; and a revised version be distributed to members. THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND At Task Force meeting #3101 on November 21, 2001, Karen Wianecki of Planning Solutions presented an initial Workplan which outlined her November and December 2001 deliverables. Each of the promised deliverables were met, including participation in the itemized meetings and public open house events, and the drafting of the open house brochure, the Task Forces vision statement and the Watershed Strategy Document. Draft 1 of the strategy document, due at the end of December 2001, included an executive summary, the introduction and purpose, WOO Jan. 9, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #1/02 JK6 the background /context, and the vision and principles. According to the November - December Workplan, the delivery of the strategic direction and targets portion of the strategy document was to be determined, and the presentation of the January to June 2002 Workplan was scheduled for the next Task Force meeting (to be held on January 9, 2002, postponed from December 12, 2001). RATIONALE To date, development of the Watershed Strategy Document remains on target. Ms. Wianecki has prepared a Workplan for the period of December 2001 to June 2002. A revised version will be circulated to members once reconciled with the Proposed Technical Timeline. PRESENTATIONS TRANS CANADA TRAIL Bryan Howard of Greenways Unlimited provided members with some general material about the Trans Canada Trail system as well as handouts specific to his presentation about the Trans Canada Trail in Durham Region. There are three sections of the trail in Durham that Bryan is involved with: 1) City of Pickering 26.1 km; 2) Town of Ajax -13.3 km; 3) Township of Uxbridge - 22.3 km. Further information on the Trans Canada Trail is online at: www.tctrail.ca HEADWATERS TRAIL INFO.... Teresa Johnston, on behalf of Dave Martin of the Uxbridge Trail Association, made a brief presentation about it's grant application to the Ontario Trillium Foundation for development of the Uxbridge Trans Canada Trail and the Pickering /Ajax Trans Canada Trail as part of the Durham Region Trans Canada Trail Project. The project specifically involves identifying routes, negotiating access, and planning for trail operations. RES. #JK7 /02 - ROLE OF TASK FORCE IN TRAIL PLANNING Moved by: Seconded by: M. Carroll J. Fraser THAT TRCA staff table a report at the next Task Force meeting recommending the role of the Task Force in planning for trails in the Duffins and Carruthers watersheds. . CARRIED TRCA TECHNICAL WORK S. Meek of the TRCA provided a handout and made a brief presentation on the progress of the TRCA Technical staff in developing strategies for the management of the Duffins and Carruthers watersheds. As well, a proposed timeline was tabled for the remainder of the project identifying major deliverables and the required input from Task Force members. It was determined that a core review team of Task Force members would be assembled to provide feedback to Sonya on the draft strategies as they were prepared. A revised timeline will be circulated. Also the results of the Reesor Creek subwatershed management strategy would be tabled at the next Task Force meeting. Jan. 9, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #1/02 JK7 STRATEGY DOCUMENT AND WORKPLAN K. Wianecki of Planning Solutions made a brief presentation on the work she has completed to date in preparing a draft watershed strategy document. It was determined that the same core review team per RES #8102 mentioned above would provide comments on the draft watershed strategy document that was handed out at the meeting. As per RES #6/02, comments would be consolidated by Cathy Crinnion• and forwarded to the writer. K. Wianecki also tabled a workplan which she prepared in December before the TRCA Technical schedule was developed. It was determined that her timetable would need to be adjusted to reflect the four to six week adjustment of activities and the workplan would be circulated prior to the next Task Force meeting. RES # 8/02 - REVIEW COMMITTEE Moved by: Seconded by: N. Burnett D. Dodge THAT a committee be set up of approximately 10 people from the Duffins and Carruthers WAtershed Task Forces, municipalities and TRCA staff to review strategies and documents as they are prepared; AND THAT the review committee would receive documents electronically to reduce the number of meetings in person; AND FURTHER THAT the Task Force members participating in the reviews include: N. Burnett, J. Nemeth, M. Carroll, S. Crawford, S. Yourt, D. Dodge and J. Sullivan. CARRIED RES # 9/02 - OUTREACH COMMITTEE Moved by: Seconded by: N. Burnett D. Dodge THAT a committee be re- established to help raise awareness of the work of the Task Force and help prepare for future public consultation events; AND FURTHER THAT Task Force members participating in the outreach committee include: N. Burnett, J. Nemeth, S. Crawford, D. Fry, T. Wong, M. Carroll, S. Para and P. Keubler along with representatives from local environmental organizations. CARRIED BACKGROUND Concerns were addressed regarding past difficulties in spreading the word for events and plans within the watersheds. Discussion proceeded from the re- establishment of the outreach committee to involvement of representatives from local environmental groups (e.g.; municipal Environmental Advisory Committees, Durham Conservation Association, Uxbridge Conservation Association, Save the Oak Ridges Moraine, Save the Rouge, the Green Door Alliance, etc.). A cooperative effort between the Task Forces' outreach committee and local groups would serve to promote the various plans and projects being undertaken from both ends of the partnership. Wrli Jan. 9, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #1/02 JK8 OTHER BUSINESS URBAN DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — UPDATE This item was brought forward from Task Force meeting #03/01. G. Bowen attended a Durham Chapter of the Urban Development Institute held November 22, 2001 along with Task Force member A. Kimble. An update was given on the progress of the work of the two task forces and a commitment was made to keep UDI apprised of the ongoing work of the Task Forces. They were also encouraged to participate in the development of the strategies and invited to participate in the launch of the watershed strategies. The Durham Chapter expressed their support for the work of the Task Forces. GOLF COURSE MEETING - UPDATE This item was brought forward from Task Force meeting #03/01. G. Bowen reported that six of 13 golf courses were in attendance at the last Golf Course Consultation Meeting held November 19, 2001 at Sleepy Hollow Golf Course. Task Force member N. Acton was actively involved in setting up the meeting and encouraging industry colleagues to participate in the development of the watershed strategies. Other Task Force members in attendance included: S. Para, M. Carroll, M. Kenedy and D. Dodge. Golf Course stakeholders discussed best management practices and benefit of TRCA technical expertise and management recommendations in their day to day golf course operations. Members of the local media were also invited to tour Sleepy Hollow Golf Course and learn about sustainable management practices in place that benefit and preserve the health of the Duffins watershed. Staff Writer Mike Adler published a favourable article in the Tuesday, November 27, 2001 edition of the Era - Banner. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the joint task force is scheduled for February 27, 2002. A complete schedule of dates will be distributed to members prior to the next meeting. Also, keep Saturday, April 20 , 2002 available for a full day workshop. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:20 p.m. on January 9, 2002. /vg Brian E. Denney J. Craig Mather Director, Watershed Management Secretary- Treasurer Wt»I L C4 ' " TORONTO AND REGION—, onservation MINUTES OF THE JOINT DUFFINS AND CARRUTHERS CREEK WATERSHEDS TASK FORCES #2/02 February 27, 2002 Page JK9 The Duffins and Carruthers Creek Watersheds Task Forces met at Pickering Recreation Complex, O'Brien Room "A" on Wednesday, February 27, 2002. Neil Burnett, Chair of the Carruthers Creek Watershed Task Force, called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT Neil Acton Member - Duffins Jane Brooke Member -- Carruthers Neil Burnett Chair - Carruthers Mark Carroll Member - Duffins Doug Dodge Member - Duffins Jackie Fraser Member - Duffins Deanna Fry Member -- Duffins Paul Kuebler Member - Carruthers Gordon McKay Member - Carruthers John Nemeth Chair - Duffins Susan Para Member -- Duffins Steve Parish Member -- Duffins David Pickles Member -- Duffins Patricia Short-Gallo Member -- Duffins Judy Sullivan Member - Duffins Steven Yourt Member - Carruthers GUESTS Steve Gaunt City of Pickering Tim Rance Ministry of Natural Resources Clayton Weller Town of Ajax Karen Wianecki Planning Solutions STAFF Gary Bowen Watershed Specialist Cathy Crinnion Watershed Strategy Assistant Pat Doody Enforcement Officer Sonya Meek Water Management Planner Al Willison Enforcement Officer WrU t 3 Feb. 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #2/02 JK10 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS N. Burnett brought the meeting to order and welcomed members and guests including: Clayton Weller of the Town of Ajax; Pat Doody and AI Willison of the Toronto Region Conservation Authority and the newest Duffins Task Force member Deanna Fry, a resident of Ajax and Vice -Chair of the Ajax Environmental Advisory Committee. There were also some general announcements and instructions on the running of the evening meeting to ensure timely discussion. Condolences were offered to Pat Brown on the recent passing of her husband Jack Brown and John Nemeth on the passing of his mother. RES. #JK10/02 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: M. Carroll S. Yourt THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/02 be approved. CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE Members were asked to review the following correspondence and 'hold' any items that require further clarification. Items b, c, d and e were 'held' for further discussion. Further details are found under Other Business. a) Letter to Gary Bowen from George Healey Re: Proposed Trail System /Bike Paths at Duffins Creek Conservation Area b) Letter to Gary Bowen from Mr. Alexander Heydon Re: Rossland Road Wetland Complex [HELD - P. KUEBLERJ c) Letter to Mr. Alexander - Heydon from Gary Bowen Re: Rossland Road Wetland Complex [HELD - P. KUEBLERJ d) Letter to Hon. David Anderson from Chair, Humber Task force Re: Designation of Road Salt as a Toxic Substance [HELD - M. CARROLL] e) E -mail to T. Kirkwood from Dr. D. Dodge, Duffins Task Force Re: Park Naturalization [HELD - D. DODGE] f) Letter to Municipalities in Humber Watershed from Chair, Humber Task Force Re: Water Source Protection Funding RES. #JK11/02 Moved by: Seconded by: M. Carroll G. McKay THAT the above correspondence be received CARRIED Feb. 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #2/02 JK11 INFORMATION Members were asked to review the following information and 'hold' any items that require further clarification. No items were held for discussion. (a) Report to TRCA Water Board re: State of the Watershed Reports (b) TRCA Sustainability Initiatives 2002 (c) Events Listing - 2002 (d) Tom Schueler's article entitled "We have met our enemy - imperviousness" (e) Whitevale Dam Correspondence (f) Revised Project Timelines RES. #JK12 /02 Moved by: Seconded by: J. Nemeth P. Short-Galle THAT the above information be received CARRIED RES. #JK13/02 REVISED STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT TIMELINES Moved by: Seconded by: D. Dodge J. Nemeth That the writer's Workplan be received; AND FURTHER THAT the writer's Workplan, spanning January to June of 2002, be approved. CARRIED BACKGROUND At Task Force Meeting #1102, on January 9, 2002, Karen Wianecki of Planning Solutions presented the second component of her Workplan, which outlined her January to June 2002 deliverables. At that meeting, several inconsistencies were noted with the overall Project Work Plan, resulting from delays associated with the water balance model. It was determined that the writer's Workplan would be presented to the Task Force members at the February 27th meeting. The two Workplans have been reconciled and the inconsistencies in delivery dates have been resolved. Karen Wianecki will be responsible for completing the final watershed strategy by the end of June 2002. Launch of the Strategy will follow in the Fall. RATIONALE Since the beginning of the consulting contract, each of the promised deliverables have been met. The Workplan which is appended to this report is being brought forward for Task Force approval. Feb. 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #2/02 JK12 Duffins and Carruthers Creek Watershed Management Strategy Proposed Workplan - January 2002 to September 2002 DATE December 21, 2001 DELIVERABLE Draft Watershed Strategy SPECIFIC DETAILS Draft document for Gary January 9, 2002 Task Force Meeting • draft strategy • receive comments Discuss draft strategy and distribute copies for review and comment February 20, 2002 Draft Strategy revised • Chapters 2 & 3 Comments from Task Force via Cathy Crinnion March 22, 2002 Draft Framework • Chapters 4 & 5 Comments from Task Force via Cathy Crinnion April 20, 2002 Task Force Workshop • input to tech staff on how to present mgmt actions to task force • mgmt actions to be discussed for presentation at open house Attend, as scheduled . April 30, 2002 Draft Ch. 4 & 5 information for public consultation May 6 - 13, 2002 Second series of Public Open Houses Attend open houses Assist with public information packages as required May /June 2002 Revisions to final strategies based on public input In consultation with task force and TRCA staff June 12, 2001 Revised strategy chapters 1 to 5 (in time for advance distribution to Task Force) June /July 2002 Presentations to Municipal Staff based on entire Public Consultation Process Assist, as required June 26, 2002 Task Force meeting Attend, as required late summer 2002 Final Desktop version of Strategy TRCA responsibility Fall 2002 Launch Watershed Strategy and Implementation TRCA responsibility Feb. 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #2/02 JK13 RES. #JK14/02 REVISED DRAFT STRATEGY - PART 1 Moved by: Seconded by: G. McKay S. Yourt THAT the writer's revised draft Watershed Strategy Document (February /02) be received; THAT the Task Forces, in particular the Editorial Subcommittee, and appropriate TRCA staff review the revised draft Watershed Strategy Document (February /02) and provide comments to Cathy Crinnion by March 13, 2002; THAT Cathy Crinnion coordinate comments on the draft Watershed Strategy Document (February /02) and forward these to the writer; AND FURTHER THAT these comments be incorporated by the•writer and be forwarded to the Task Forces for approval at meeting #3/02 CARRIED BACKGROUND At Task Force meeting #1/02 on January 9, 2002, Karen Wianecki of Planning Solutions presented Draft 1 (December /01) of the Duffins and Carruthers Watershed Strategy Document. Following this meeting, comments were gathered from Task Force members, municipal staff and TRCA staff, and forwarded to Ms. Wianecki. TRCA staff, specifically the authors of the State of the Watershed chapters, were given the task of reviewing the background information that appeared in Section 4 of the December 2001 draft, and reducing it to minimal content to appear in Section 3 of the February 2002 draft. This was done with the intention of directing the reader to the appropriate State of the Watershed chapters for additional background detail, as these two reports will serve as companion documents. RATIONALE The revised draft of the Watershed Strategy Document (February /02) reflects the comments presented to Ms. Wianecki from Task Force members, municipal staff and TRCA staff. It is recognized that some details and topic information are pending, and will be incorporated into future drafts. 'For instance, TRCA staff are working to supply Ms. Wianecki with text regarding sustainability issues, as well as the management actions relating to the individual strategies and the implementation approaches for the strategies. As with Draft 1, there will be opportunities for Task Force members, municipal staff and TRCA staff to comment on future t drafts of the Watershed Strategy Document. PRESENTATIONS PROTOCOLS FOR FISH HABITAT PROTECTION - A. WILLISON, P. DOODY, C. WELLER TRCA has four Enforcement and Security officers; three patrol the valley systems in the entire jurisdiction. This team works with the community as much as possible, and their objective is to prevent Toss of life and to minimize property damage on TRCA lands. They are appointed as officers to enforce regulations under the Conservation Authorities Act, Provincial Offences Officers, and OPP Special Constables. Under the Conservation Authorities Act, Sections 28 (compliance monitoring - regulation, flood warning) and 29 (Authority -owned lands Feb. 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #2/02 JK14 management) are of primary concern to the Enforcement and Security team. Sediment and erosion control are large concerns, since these directly affect the quality of fish habitat. The tasks of the TRCA Enforcement and Security officers are becoming more difficult as the population grows. Patrolling is a good means to catch infractions, and also to act upon complaints. They investigate infractions, are peace officers, and attend court cases when necessary. When a conviction is found, an order for restoration of the damage follows. Fines have been increasing, but still seem low. Restoration often costs much more to the offender than the fine itself. Clayton Weller is a By -law officer for the Town of Ajax. The Town often looks to TRCA models when updating their by -laws. His department generally works on a per complaint basis, having taken more than 1,000 in 2001, regarding infractions such as tree - cutting without a permit or sediment and erosion control issues. Mr. Weller was pleased to report that the Ajax Parks Department has been re- naturalizing areas adjacent to streams recently. REESOR CREEK INTEGRATION PROJECT - S. MEEK Sonya Meek of the TRCA provided a progress report on the strategy integration process, using some of the Reesor Creek Pilot Subwatershed examples. Resource Science staff have been discussing the links and connections between the systems in the watersheds, and developing predictive models that will assist each discipline to recommend appropriate watershed , management strategies. The team is currently in a holding pattern regarding items that relate to the upcoming water budget; the budget should be available by the end of March. Once this occurs, integration in the remaining subwatershed units will move quickly. The team is still on target in terms of their workplan. A background technical report summarizing the team's work and methodologies will be presented to the Task Forces, which will be defensible and ready to distribute to peers for review. The next steps for the Resource Science team include: requesting a peer- review consultation, involving municipal staff and others, once the Reesor Creek pilot study is completed; completing the analysis for all subwatersheds; and, assembling management actions (high -level watershed scale programs with examples at the community or backyard levels). More details to follow at the March Task Forces meeting and at the April workshop. UPDATE: AJAX WINTERFEST - G. BOWEN The Ajax Winterfest occurred on Saturday, February 9th at the Greenwood Conservation Area. Organized by the Town, it attracted large crowds of primarily young families. G. Bowen and C. Crinnion staffed an information booth containing several current conditions posters (relating to water quality, cultural heritage, aquatic habitat and species, for example) and talked with approximately 60 participants. Information about the Duffins and Carruthers watersheds and Task Forces was available for those who were interested, and approximately 30 people left their names and addresses to be contacted for future events. Although informal, many people learned more about these watersheds. Staff would appreciate hearing from the municipalities regarding other events that we might attend with information for the public. UPDATE: GLEN MAJOR HOOT'N HOWL - G. BOWEN G. Bowen reported that family and friends were treated to an evening of learning and outdoor adventure at the Glen Major Conservation Lands on the Oak Ridges Moraine. The evening began with a slide presentation on the biology and behaviour of owls and coyotes. Then participants hiked into the forests of the ORM where staff called for coyotes and owls. Over 70 wrl'V Feb. 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #2/02 JK15 people attended. An informal survey indicated that the majority were from Pickering and Ajax. Those attending learned of the evening through newspaper advertisements and articles. UPDATE: AGRICULUTURAL CONSULTATION - G. BOWEN G. Bowen reported that the second stakeholder meeting involving the agriculture and rural community was held on February 20, 2002 at the Claremont Community Centre. The purpose of the meeting was to continue consultation with our progress developing the watershed strategies and to seek direction on a proposal to initiate a Rural Clean Water Program in the Duffins and Carruthers. Patricia Lowe, Stewardship Coordinator, TRCA gave a presentation and led discussions on starting a Reesor Creek pilot in 2002. Based on participant's comments, TRCA staff are reviewing their proposals and will be discussing revisions with one or two farmers from the Reesor Creek Subwatershed. Farmers who attended the meeting raised local and watershed -wide concerns such as: pesticide and fertilizer applications in urban centres and inland fill in the headwaters of the Carruthers. Councillor Mark Carroll attended the event on behalf of the Duffins Creek Task Force. VOLUNTEER MONITORING - G. BOWEN TRCA biology staff has developed a kit /program (included in the agenda package starting on page 33) and need volunteers to monitor various locations within the watersheds. Staff will provide detailed training, so that a scientific background is not required in order to become involved. The program will occur over a 3 -year period, requiring approximately 15 days of active participation over the course of that time. Permission from landowners has already been established. For more information, refer to pages 33 - 35 of the meeting #2/02 agenda package, or leave a message at (416) 661 -6600 ext.5321. OTHER BUSINESS Further detail on the Correspondence that was held is as follows: Correspondence Re: Rossland Road Wetland There was some concern that the TRCA response should be more extensive. G. Bowen clarified that the letter from Mr. Alexander Heydon was received, investigated and discussed with TRCA staff. P. Doody looked at the site and saw no evidence that it had been disturbed by human intervention. G. Bowen also replied to Mr. Heydon via email. A copy of that email will be shared with Task Force members as part of the next meeting agenda. G. McKay asked when the wetland was last evaluated. Those details were not known. Correspondence Re: Designation of Road Salt as a Toxic Substance It was recommended that TRCA monitor this issue and as new methods and innovations are brought about, that the TRCA inform their member municipalities and Task Forces. C. Crinnion will investigate as to whether or not the TRCA has discussed this issue in the recent past, and _ report back at the March 27, 2002 meeting of the Task Forces ( #3/02). Correspondence Re: Park Naturalization D. Dodge reported that he wished to bring a resolution to the Task Forces to help further discussions and concerns that G. McKay and he had regarding Park Naturalization in the Town of Ajax. S. Parish reported that some effort is being made to re- naturalize parks in the Town of Ajax. Although some residents like to see manicured parks, town staff recognized the advantages of park naturalization. As well, public opinion is slowly changing. Feb. 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #2/02 JK16 D. Fry, Vice Chair, EAC for Town of Ajax added that naturalization is on the agenda for their next meeting and invites Task Force support. There is a need to educate the public and council of the benefits of leaving sensitive areas to renaturalize. RES. #JK12/02 Moved by: Seconded by: D. Dodge G. McKay WHEREAS large areas of the watersheds of Duffins and Carruthers creeks have been denuded of trees and shrubs to an extent whereby water quality and quantity characteristics of these watersheds have been detrimentally affected; AND WHEREAS long stretches of stream corridors and Lake Ontario shorelines are presently without sufficient vegetation so that native fish, wildlife, and plants are affected by lack of shade and by insufficient growing conditions; AND WHEREAS denuded stream and lake shores are susceptible to erosion and slumping; AND WHEREAS the Duffins and Carruthers creeks Task Forces are considering recommendations to exhort municipalities to undertake programs which would increase the amount of shrub and tree plantings within these two watersheds; THEREFORE be it resolved that the Task Forces for Duffins and Carruthers creeks encourage all municipalities within the Duffins and Carruthers watersheds to continue and expand upon the process of naturalization wherever possible within their respective communities. CARRIED NEW BUSINESS TRCA'S TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM G. Bowen invited members to participate in a technical review of the TRCA's Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program. Judy Sullivan attended a recent workshop on behalf of the Duffins Creek Task Force. For more information about the program contact Gary at (416) 661 -6600 ext.5383 or Lionel Normand at ext.5327. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the joint task force is scheduled for March 27, 2002 at the Claremont Community Centre. The remainder of Task Force meetings will be held in more rural locations. Carpooling arrangements will be made. Feb. 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #2/02 JK17 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:40 p.m. on February 27, 2002. /vg Brian E. Denney J. Craig Mather Director, Watershed Management Secretary- Treasurer wM l3 t C TORONTO AND REGION The-- onservatlon MINUTES OF THE JOINT DUFFINS CREEK AND CARRUTHERS CREEK WATERSHEDS TASK FORCES #3/02 March 27, 2002 Page JK18 The Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watersheds Task Forces met at Claremont Community Centre, Lion's Room on Wednesday, March 27, 2002. John Nemeth, Chair of the Duffins Creek Watershed Task Force, called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT Neil Acton Member -- Carruthers Jane Brooke Member -- Carruthers Neil Burnett Chair - Carruthers Mark Carroll Vice -Chair - Duffins David Clark Member - Carruthers Scott Crawford Vice - Chair, Carruthers Doug Dodge Member - Duffins Deanna Fry Member -- Duffins Gordon McKay Member - Carruthers John Nemeth Chair - Duffins Susan Para Member -- Duffins Patricia Short-Galls Member -- Duffins Judy Sullivan Member -,Duffins GUESTS Lilli Duoba Town of Markham Steve Gaunt City of Pickering Kevin Heritage Town of Ajax Tim Rance Ministry of Natural Resources Karen Wianecki Planning Solutions STAFF Gary Bowen Watershed Specialist David Burnett Senior Planner Cathy Crinnion Watershed Strategy Assistant Valerie Gust Assistant Sonya Meek Water Management Planner (A013 Z March 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #3/02 JK19 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS J. Nemeth brought the meeting to order and welcomed members and guests. RES. #JK16 /02 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: D. Dodge N. Burnett THAT the Minutes of Meeting #2/02 be approved. CARRIED INFORMATION Inventory of Wetlands and Other Natural Heritage Features M. Carroll inquired about the protection of wetlands given ongoing construction /development trends. It was confirmed that the Duffins /Carruthers strategy will recommend the protection of wetlands and that the Oak Ridges Moraine Plan will also address imperviousness. Putting Down Roots in Durham, This Week S. Para noted that there is a lot of data backing the newspaper article that is available through the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and the Township of Uxbridge if anyone is interested. RES. #JK17 /02 Moved by: Seconded by: ROAD SALT M. Carroll N. Burnett THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority inform the Carruthers Creek and Duffins Creek Watersheds Task Forces regarding the Minister of the Environment and Energy's reply to Lois Griffin's correspondence, dated January 28, 2002; THAT the municipal representatives involved with the Carruthers Creek and Duffins Creek Task Forces provide information to the Task Forces regarding road salt use and innovative practices to reduce salt use within their jurisdiction; THAT the Watershed Strategy promote the reduction of road salt use so that an appropriate balance is struck between environmental health and personal safety; AND FURTHER THAT as innovative salt management practices emerge that municipalities revise their official planning documents CARRIED Wri13F March 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #3/02 JK20 BACKGROUND At Task Force meeting #2/02, on February 27, 2002, Mark Carroll held item 5.4 for further discussion. This was an item of correspondence to the Honourable David Anderson, Minister of the Environment, from Lois Griffin, Chair of the Humber Watershed Alliance, regarding the designation of road salt as a toxic substance. Mr. Carroll requested that TRCA keep the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Task Forces and each of the municipalities advised regarding staff research on the toxic effects of road salt, and to ensure that the Task Forces be informed upon the Minister's reply to Ms. Griffin. RATIONALE Attached to this report is an item placed before the TRCA's Watershed Management Advisory Board regarding Environment Canada's designation of road salt as a toxic substance. This report contains recommendations to TRCA that staff continue to exchange information with the area municipalities regarding road salt, as well as to seek the means for reducing the use of salt on TRCA property. York Region is setting a strong example and making responsible recommendations regarding the use of road salt. Refer to the attached York Region policies relating to Road Salt and Winter Maintenance. Durham Region municipalities are also adopting measures to reduce the amount of salt applied to their roads and walkways. Road salt issues can be best addressed by municipal plans, and by practices put forth by the Ministry of Transportation and Transport Canada. One initiative by Transport Canada is the recycling of glycol on de -icing pads. The private sector is developing alternatives for road salt. Innovative Municipal Products, a Canadian -based company with an office in Ajax, specializes in products for paving and road maintenance that excel in winter conditions. Their product line includes ice melters and de- icing products that they claim work more effectively than other salt -based products while being less harmful to vegetation and water sources. For further information, visit www.innovativecompany.com or request details from Gary Bowen. Also attached for additional information is a paper presented by Bowen and Hinton at the 1998 Groundwater in a Watershed Context symposium, entitled The Temporal and Spatial Impacts of Road Salt on Streams Draining the Greater Toronto Area. 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes (Whites Road and Highway 401) s m tie 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1968 1989 1990 1991 1992 Year I ❑ AADT March 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #3/02 JK21 80 60 J co 4 E 20 0 Figure _6_: Duffins Creek Chloride (State of the Watershed report) • Choride — 12 Month Moving Average 1965 1969 • 1973 (figure from the State of the Watershed report) 1977 1981 1985 1989 1993 RES. #JK18/02 WETLAND LOSS: TRCA MAPPING OF EXISTING AND HISTORIC WETLANDS IN THE DUFFINS AND CARRUTHERS Moved by: Seconded by: S. Crawford D. Dodge THAT discussion regarding the Watershed Management Actions for the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Strategy address the feasibility to regenerate some of the lost wetlands in these watersheds CARRIED BACKGROUND Item 5.2 in the agenda for Meeting #2/02 held February 27, 2002, contained correspondence regarding the wetland complex which drains into Carruthers Creek on the north and south sides of Rossland Road. This piece of correspondence has generated discussion regarding this specific wetland (see Item 5.1 in this agenda) and served as a reminder that there are fewer wetlands, both large and small, than there once was in the Carruthers Creek and Duffins Creek watersheds. These paragraphs are excerpts from an article on the Internet entitled Waterfowl and Wetlands of Long Point Bay and Old Norfolk County, obtained on March 22, 2002 from www.kwic.com /-- Iongpointbio /wetlands /9.0/9.2.3.htm, and are included as background on this issue: Being the most densely populated area of Canada, southern Ontario has experienced dramatic wetland losses since European settlement. Prior to 1800, 2.38 million ha of wetland were distributed throughout southern Ontario, representing 25.5% of the total March 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #3/02 JK22 surface area (Snell 1987). By 1982, only 0.93 million ha remained, the majority of which is located in the northern portions of southern Ontario. Overall, wetland area was reduced by 61%; loss south of the Precambrian Shield amounted to 68% (Snell 1987). In Carolinian Canada, wetlands, which originally represented 28.3% of the landscape, covered just 5.1% in 1982, representing a loss of 83% of the area's wetlands (Reid et al. 1996) . Most wetland Toss in southern Ontario can be attributed to dredging, draining and filling, primarily for agricultural purposes, as well as to the spread of urbanization. Most of that wetland Toss occurred before 1967. While the rate of wetland loss has declined substantially since 1967, the majority of that loss continues to be due to agricultural practices... The extensive destruction of wetlands before 1967 can be attributed to a poorly informed farming community and to the fact that wetlands simply could not compete economically with other land uses. While small temporary and seasonal wetlands continue to be removed by certain farmers for ease of operation of large farm machinery, wetland loss has probably slowed since 1982 (Snell 1987). Most of the wetland loss since 1967 has involved mainly scattered and relatively small wetlands (Snell 1987). This is probably due to the fact that most large wetlands are either in public ownership and protected, or owned by individuals concerned with their preservation. Snell (1987) did not include small ( <10 ha), easily and readily drained wetlands in her analysis. She also did not attempt to include indirect degradation (loss of function) or partial drainage of wetlands, which have been estimated to have adversely afflicted three times more wetland area than wetland removal (Bardecki 1981) . Temporary and seasonal wetlands, which are often little more than depressions in agricultural fields, are critically important for staging and breeding waterfowl and shorebirds (Robinson 1995). This can be attributed to the fact that they thaw quickly, providing aquatic habitat while other deeper wetland areas are still frozen. They also warm up very quickly, providing the necessary nutrients for invertebrates, plants, and amphibians all of which are important food sources for migrating waterbirds. The abundant aquatic invertebrate life found in these ponds is particularly important for pre - laying and laying female ducks. Elizabeth Snell's mapping of historical and existing wetlands in the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek watersheds has been digitized from 1:50000 topographic maps by the GIS staff at TRCA (refer to the attached maps). RES. #JK19/02 PUBLIC USE AND HUMAN HERITAGE STRATEGIES Moved by: Seconded by: M. Carroll J. Sullivan THAT the staff report on the draft public use and human heritage strategies be received; THAT the proposed strategy framework be adopted; March 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #3/02 JK23 THAT Task Force members review and comment on the presentation format and specific recommendations for public use and human heritage subjects; AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff incorporate comments received as they proceed to develop and refine all strategies CARRIED BACKGROUND During 2001 the Land and Water Working Group of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watershed Task Forces developed a framework for presenting draft watershed management strategies, including the following elements: Objective: Indicator: General statement of intended management approach and directions necessary to address the key issues. A fact or device that provides specific information on the state or condition of something of interest. Indicators provide a means to assess progress toward an objective. Measure: Quantitative or qualitative ways to measure the state of the indicator. Management Actions: Mechanisms used to achieve the objective. Types of management actions include: - policy and planning - regulations - stewardship, regeneration, education /awareness - land securement and acquisition - monitoring - future research /study needs Implementing Parties: Parties involved in carrying out the management actions. The framework elements, as defined, are consistent with those used by the TRCA in other watershed strategies, report cards, and in the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. They are also consistent with approaches increasingly being used by other state of the environment reporting programs used by municipalities and Great Lakes groups. The Land and Water Working Group, with the assistance of TRCA staff, developed a set of management strategies using this framework. The objective statements were the subject of public consultation during November and December 2001. TRCA staff have proceeded to use these working strategies as a guide for their technical work. Staff have extended the framework to include: Targets: A numerical threshold or directional aim, associated with each measure, and chosen as a minimum (or maximum) state necessary to achieve the desired objective. Wri137 March 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #3/02 JK24 Public Use and Human Heritage Strategies The attachment to this report contains draft strategies for the Public Use and Human Heritage components of the Task Force's Strategy document. The material is provided for Task Force discussion as an illustration of the strategy framework, a proposed format for presentation within the strategy document, and for feedback on the actual management directions being recommended for the Public Use and Human Heritage components. TRCA staff have proposed that the Task Force's Strategy document could also serve as a first Report Card on watershed health, by rating current conditions against each of the defined management objectives and associated measures /targets. Staff have developed rating systems as part of other watershed report card exercises, and continue to strive toward the development of methods that are objective and repeatable in future years. Ratings are based on a quantitative analysis to the extent possible. Details of the rating analysis will be documented in a background technical report. Assigned ratings range from: Excellent - better than 80% Good - between 70 and 79% Fair - between 60 and 69% Poor - between 50 and 59% Fail - below 50% PRESENTATIONS Public Use and Human Heritage Strategies S. Meek oriented members to the Public Use and Human Heritage strategies that were distributed as part of the agenda package. These strategies are the first of a number of strategies to be tabled for Task Force feedback. At the next meeting (workshop) the water related strategies would be reviewed in detail. S. Meek explained that the purpose of going through these strategies as a task force was to: - agree on the level of detail that will be presented in the strategy documents - agree on the accuracy of the strategies - agree on the format of the tables to ensure readability A feedback form was distributed to members to capture some of their thoughts during her presentation. Although discussion followed the presentations, submitting written comments is also welcomed and should be forwarded to Sonya at the TRCA. What follows is a summary of comments related to the general format and content of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy document: keep the document as short as possible (without losing the important detail) by avoiding duplication of information throughout the document decide the audience of the document so that the technical content is appropriate the goal statements need to be "punchier" put large charts in appendices where possible Wr1i31 March 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #3/02 JK25 pull some information into an executive summary that can be a "stand alone document" include a "rating" column for both Duffins and Carruthers include an "over all rating" measure for each indicator include a chart which indicates implementing partner for each strategy express ratings from 1 -5 or by grade A -F all elements are essential, but change the order of details to: Goal, Objectives, Management Actions, Implementers, Targets, Measure another suggestion was to have Indicators first followed by actions that can be measured move definitions into a glossary combine objectives where possible to reduce number of tables Human Heritage C. Crinnion provided an overview of the Human Heritage strategies and invited members for their feedback. Suggestions to improve the Human Heritage related strategies include: encourage municipalities to profile human heritage by erecting plaques indicating heritage buildings and events create heritage trails /self - guided walking tours for individual towns, but also on a watershed scale (link the towns and villages) develop rapport with development community to raise awareness of the importance of preserving human heritage recommend appropriate official planning policy enforceable by municipalities develop curriculum for local schools to understand human heritage and original inhabitants of area speak with adjacent conservation authorities to set standards for data collection and heritage protection Public Use S. Meek provided an overview on Mike Bender's behalf (TRCA's Landscape Architect). Suggestions to improve the Public Use related strategies include: recommend that municipalities be consistent with the Duffins /Carruthers strategy ensure that development be strategic so as not to impact on the natural site (for example, provide focal points, nodes, centres where people can recreate in the watershed) explain that a benefit of public use is that it helps people make a connection to their watershed ensure that protection comes first don't request more 'studies' or 'data collection' — actions can be taken now decide on consistent use of wording: 'greenlands', 'open space' and 'greenspace systems' recommend that an outdoor recreation masterplan for the entire watershed be created delete the personal safety objective and integrate it with the other remaining objectives. March 27, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #3/02 JK26 NEW BUSINESS Gap Analysis G. Bowen asked members to give some thought to areas or features of the watershed that the strategies have missed or do not seem to be addressing. Some examples may be the issue of sustainable development and human lifestyle practices. There was some discussion on how the strategies must in general be implementable and enforceable. Although the strategy document will recommend implementation tools and mechanisms, there will be an Implementation Team struck to champion the actions and report back on the progress. There was general agreement that the scope of strategies address the necessary actions, but that if in coming weeks, any gaps come to mind that G. Bowen or S. Meek would be pleased to receive feedback. Rouge Park North Management Plan J. Sullivan inquired about the status of the Rouge Park North Management Plan. L. Duoba of the Town of Markham provided some background on the management plan and its implementation using official planning documents. Since there was some interested in this project and it's possible application to the ongoing development of strategies for Duffins /Carruthers, it was suggested that the report be made available to members and that L. Duoba make a brief presentation at the next Task Force meeting. RES. #JK20/02 ROUGE PARK NORTH MANAGEMENT PLAN Moved by: Seconded by: J. Sullivan D. Dodge THAT information on the Rouge Park North Management Plan be made available to members and that L. Duoba be invited to make a brief presentation on this topic at the next Task Force meeting CARRIED NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the joint task force is scheduled for April 20, 2002 at Greenwood Community Centre. This will be a full day workshop and facilitated by Sue Cumming. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:30 p.m. on March 27, 2002. /vg Brian E. Denney J. Craig Mather Director, Watershed Management Secretary- Treasurer W TORONTO AND REGION "Y1 onservation MINUTES OF THE JOINT DUFFINS CREEK AND CARRUTHERS CREEK WATERSHEDS TASK FORCES #4/02 May 29, 2002 Page JK27 The Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watersheds Task Forces met at the Lebovic Community (Leisure) Centre Wednesday, May 29, 2002. Neil Burnett, Chair of the Carruthers Creek Watershed Task Force, called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT Neil Acton Member -- Carruthers Jane Brooke Member -- Carruthers Neil Burnett Chair - Carruthers Mark Carroll Vice -Chair - Duffins Doug Dodge Member - Duffins Gordon McKay Member - Carruthers Cindy Milton- Wilkie Member - Carruthers Susan Para Member -- Duffins GUESTS Steve Gaunt City of Pickering Jennifer Hughes Transport Canada Tim Rance Ministry of Natural Resources Karen Wianecki Planning Solutions STAFF Gary Bowen Watershed Specialist Cathy Crinnion Assistant Archeologist Joanne Jeffery Watershed Strategy Assistant Sonya Meek Water Management Planner wr1I LIl May 29, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #4/02 JK28 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS N. Burnett brought the meeting to order and welcomed members and guests and introduced Jennifer Hughes from Transport Canada. RES. #JK21/02 MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: D. Dodge M. Carroll THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/02 be approved. CARRIED INFORMATION RES. #JK22/02 PAULYNN PARK EVENT, JULY 12 -13, 2002 Moved by: Seconded by: D. Dodge M. Carroll THAT the staff report on the Paulynn Park event be received; THAT Councillors and residents on the Task Force assist TRCA staff in planning similar events within their municipality for the summer and fall of 2002; AND FURTHER THAT Task Force members attend the event and support the planning committee by lending a hand. CARRIED BACKGROUND Although the Fish Management Plan for the Duffins and Carruthers Creeks is still being finalized there are a number of opportunities to begin implementation. Paulynn Park, located in the Town of Ajax is one site that has been identified as a candidate for stream rehabilitation for rainbow trout. TRCA staff, the Town of Ajax and Task Force members have secured funding and materials to implement this project. In order to profile the Fish Plan, the work of the Duffins and Carruthers Creek Task Forces and the benefits of this project, a weekend event is being organized. On the weekend of July 12 to 14, the Ajax and Pickering Rod and Gun club, along with TRCA and Ministry of Natural Resources staff, will be rehabilitating a stretch of eroded banks in Paulynn Park. The public is being invited to participate in a slidq presentation on Friday night and a number of family oriented activities on Saturday. Due to the heavy nature of the rehabilitation works and safety issues surrounding the equipment being used, the public will not be asked to assist in the work related to the stream bank rehabilitation. Ron Holloway, a River Keeper from Hampshire England, will be the guest speaker on Friday July 12, at approximately 9 p.m. A large tent will be the venue for his slide presentation on stream management and rehabilitation in Great Britain. On Saturday, July 13, the public will be encouraged to bring a picnic and come to the park and participate in nature walks, and a tour May 29, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #4/02 JK29 of the rehabilitation works in progress. Children's activities will include building bird boxes and other habitat related crafts. Displays and stewardship information items will also be available. More details will be available at the June 26 Task Force Meeting. Resources are available and candidate sites have been identified for restoration work in other locations in the two watersheds. RES. #JK23/02 SHARING A VISION, SHARING A FUTURE, GATHERING GROUND - DRAFT 3 Moved by: Seconded by: G. McKay M. Carroll THAT Sharing A Vision...Sharing a Future , Gathering Ground - Draft 3 be received; THAT the Task Forces, and appropriate TRCA and Municipal staff review Sharing A Vision...Sharing a Future , Gathering Ground - Draft 3 and provide comments to Joanne Jeffery by June 12, 2002; AND FURTHER THAT these comments be incorporated and a revised document be forwarded to the Task Forces for approval at meeting #5/02 CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Task Force meeting #2/02 held on February 27, 2002 and Task Force Meeting #3/02 held on March 27, 2002, TRCA staff and the writer Karen Wianecki of Planning Solutions presented revised text for the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy. Based upon comments received from the Task Force members and external reviewers extensive revisions were made to the document to improve both the organization and the content. At the Task Force meeting held on April 20, 2002, participants articulated a "management philosophy" for the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy, and summarized the various management actions as "Key Steps" for managing the two watersheds. A decision was also made at this meeting to include within the implementation chapter, a watershed policies section which establishes the framework for application of the various management actions. To assist local stakeholders and municipalities to better understand local opportunities and to start planning implementation, watershed actions have been summarized on a subwatershed basis. RATIONALE The revised watershed strategy for Duffins and Carruthers reflects the comments and directions the writer and TRCA staff have received from watershed residents, stakeholders, municipal staff and Task Force Members. A final version of the Watershed Strategy will be presented at the final Task Force meeting on June 26, 2002 for their endorsement. k)1111-13 May 29, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #4/02 JK30 RES. #JK24/02 Moved by: Seconded by: APRIL 20Th WORKSHOP REPORT S. Para G. McKay THAT the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Task Forces Getting Closer to the "Aiming Point Workshop Report" from April 20, 2002 be received for information; AND FURTHER THAT everyone who attended the weekend workshop be thanked for their time commitment and their contribution to the direction now outlined in the workshop report CARRIED BACKGROUND The joint Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Task Force members met for a full day workshop on April 20, 2002 to review and provide input to the watershed strategies that are being formulated for inclusion in the watershed management plan that will be distributed for public comment in June 2002. The workshop was particularly important for updating members on the technical findings, issues and "hot spots" and in the discussion of priority management actions. A key aspect of the workshop involved brainstorming potential implementation tools and policy directions. The workshop commenced at 9:00 a.m. and concluded shortly before 4:00 p.m. Sue Cumming facilitated the workshop and overviewed the expectations and agenda for the day. Gary Bowen of The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) provided an overview of expectations for the delivery of the management strategy and the necessity to complete the work in the next few months. He noted that presentations to local councils and the Authority would take place by the end of September with the view to begin implementing the strategies in the fall of 2002. Gary highlighted the significant achievements and milestones achieved by the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Task Forces noting the importance of "getting closer to the aiming point ". A copy of the workshop report was mailed to all Task Force members and alternates on May 21, 2002. RES. #JK25/02 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION UPDATES Moved by: Seconded by: S. Para G. McKay THAT the staff report on the consultation with watershed stakeholders be received; AND FURTHER THAT TRCA staff continue to incorporate comments received from these meetings as they proceed to develop and refine all strategies CARRIED wnoNL/ May 29, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #4/02 JK31 BACKGROUND On Wednesday, May 15, TRCA staff and members of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Task Forces held three separate meetings at the Claremont Community Centre. The first meeting was held at 1 p.m. and included the representatives of the golf course industry. The meeting was one hour in length and focused on the Integral Management Actions that pertain to the golf industry. In addition to the presentation on the progress of the Watershed Strategy, three golf courses were presented with posters to display in their clubhouse that outlines their commitment to the environment through good practices and their partnership with the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Task Forces. A meeting was planned at 3 p.m. the same day with members of the Agricultural Community. Based on the excellent weather for working outdoors, we were asked to reschedule that meeting. A decision was made to send the agricultural contacts an information package and contact each representative in person through the TRCA Landowner Stewardship Coordinator. At 6:30 p.m. the third meeting was held with the Environmental presentation to the EAC members. This presentation included an overview of the watershed strategy process and details of the technical studies to date. In his wrap -up comments, Councillor Scott Crawford encouraged the EAC members to review and provide comments on the draft strategy document back to TRCA and municipal staff and to support the Strategy this fall when it goes forward to local Council for endorsement. On Wednesday, May 22, TRCA staff conducted a meeting with the representatives of the key environmental groups in the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek watersheds including the Green Door Alliance, Citizens for Carruthers, Durham Conservation, and Uxbridge Conservation. This meeting included a review of the Integral Management Actions from the Watershed Strategy document with a focus on the implementation actions that will be required by TRCA and the local and regional municipalities. RES. #JK26/02 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES — JUNE 5 AND 6, 2002 Moved by: Seconded by: G. McKay N. Burnett THAT the staff report on the June 5 and 6 public Open Houses be received; AND FURTHER THAT Task Force members sign up to attend one of the two meetings and assist TRCA staff with the presentations and /or greeting the public informally CARRIED BACKGROUND In the fall of 2001 a Communications Plan was prepared to compliment the development of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy. In that plan, two series of public consultation were identified. The first series was held in November and December of 2001. It included five meetings across the watersheds with a focus on the Issues, the Background and the Vision components of the Strategy. May 29, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #4/02 JK32 The second series of public open houses are being held on Wednesday, June 5, at the Claremont Community Centre in the City of Pickering and on Thursday, June 6, at the Pickering Village United Church in the Town of Ajax. Both meetings are from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. with a presentation at 7:30 p.m. The focus at these meetings will be on the recommendations on how to manage the watersheds to achieve the Vision and Objectives as endorsed by the public last fall. These meetings are being promoted through the circulation of a flyer, newspaper advertisements, public service announcements (PSA's) and on TRCA and municipal web sites. Presentations to municipal councils in the fall of 2002 will provide another opportunity for the public to voice their opinion regarding the Watershed Strategy. Stakeholders and residents are being encouraged to contact their municipal Councillors to express their support of this initiative. RES. #JK27/02 Moved by: Seconded by: WALKERTON PART II REPORT S. Para M. Carroll THAT the Executive Summary of the Part II Walkerton Inquiry Report be received for information; AND FURTHER THAT staff of the TRCA and municipalities be asked to review this report and to update the recommendations of draft 3 of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy to reflect the recommendations by Commissioner Dennis O'Connor CARRIED BACKGROUND The Walkerton Inquiry was established in May 2000 to examine the contamination of the water supply in Walkerton, Ontario by E.Coli bacteria and to look into future safety of the water supply in Ontario. Conservation Ontario is a non - governmental organization that represents the network of 36 Conservation Authorities (CA's) in Ontario. On behalf of the CA's, ,Conservation Ontario participated in Part II of the Walkerton Inquiry by presenting position papers and submissions to the expert meetings and public hearings. In these briefings Conservation Ontario stressed the importance of: ■ Source protection (protecting the quality of drinking water supplies); • Managing water resources on a watershed basis; • Assisting responsibility for Ontario's water resources to one lead provincial ministry; • Additional stable sources of funding for watershed management; Members of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Task Forces (Mark Carroll and Steven Yourt) participated in the preparation and delivery of a presentation on the role of watershed management at the Inquiry's Toronto Town Hall Meeting. The Part II report provides recommendations for ensuring the safety of water supply systems in Ontario. Copies of the full report are available for download from the Commission's website (www.walkertoninciuiry.com) Wr11 N I/ / May 29, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #4/02 JK31 BACKGROUND On Wednesday, May 15, TRCA staff and members of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Task Forces held three separate meetings at the Claremont Community Centre. The first meeting was held at 1 p.m. and included the representatives of the golf course industry. The meeting was one hour in length and focused on the Integral Management Actions that pertain to the golf industry. In addition to the presentation on the progress of the Watershed Strategy, three golf courses were presented with posters to display in their clubhouse that outlines their commitment to the environment through good practices and their partnership with the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Task Forces. A meeting was planned at 3 p.m. the same day with members of the Agricultural Community. Based on the excellent weather for working outdoors, we were asked to reschedule that meeting. A decision was made to send the agricultural contacts an information package and contact each representative in person through the TRCA Landowner Stewardship Coordinator. At 6:30 p.m. the third meeting was held with the Environmental presentation to the EAC members. This presentation included an overview of the watershed strategy process and details of the technical studies to date. In his wrap -up comments, Councillor Scott Crawford encouraged the EAC members to review and provide comments on the draft strategy document back to TRCA and municipal staff and to support the Strategy this fall when it goes forward to local Council for endorsement. On Wednesday, May 22, TRCA staff conducted a meeting with the representatives of the key environmental groups in the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek watersheds including the Green Door Alliance, Citizens for Carruthers, Durham Conservation, and Uxbridge Conservation. This meeting included a review of the Integral Management Actions from the Watershed Strategy document with a focus on the implementation actions that will be required by TRCA and the local and regional municipalities. RES. #JK26/02 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES - JUNE 5 AND 6, 2002 Moved by: Seconded by: G. McKay N. Burnett THAT the staff report on the June 5 and 6 public Open Houses be received; AND FURTHER THAT Task Force members sign up to attend one of the two meetings and assist TRCA staff with the presentations and /or greeting the public informally CARRIED BACKGROUND In the fall of 2001 a Communications Plan was prepared to compliment the development of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy. In that plan, two series of public consultation were identified. The first series was held in November and December of 2001. It included five meetings across the watersheds with a focus on the Issues, the Background and the Vision components of the Strategy. wr1lU7 May 29, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #4/02 JK32 The second series of public open houses are being held on Wednesday, June 5, at the Claremont Community Centre in the City of Pickering and on Thursday, June 6, at the Pickering Village United Church in the Town of Ajax. Both meetings are from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. with a presentation at 7:30 p.m. The focus at these meetings will be on the recommendations on how to manage the watersheds to achieve the Vision and Objectives as endorsed by the public last fall. These meetings are being promoted through the circulation of a flyer, newspaper advertisements, public service announcements (PSA's) and on TRCA and municipal web sites. Presentations to municipal councils in the fall of 2002 will provide another opportunity for the public to voice their opinion regarding the Watershed Strategy. Stakeholders and residents are being encouraged to contact their municipal Councillors to express their support of this initiative. RES. #JK27/02 WALKERTON PART II REPORT Moved by: Seconded by: S. Para M. Carroll THAT the Executive Summary of the Part II Walkerton Inquiry Report be received for information; AND FURTHER THAT staff of the TRCA and municipalities be asked to review this report and to update the recommendations of draft 3 of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy to reflect the recommendations by Commissioner Dennis O'Connor CARRIED BACKGROUND The Walkerton Inquiry was established in May 2000 to examine the contamination of the water supply in Walkerton, Ontario by E.Coli bacteria and to look into future safety of the water supply in Ontario. Conservation Ontario is a non - governmental organization that represents the network of 36 Conservation Authorities (CA's) in Ontario. On behalf of the CA's, Conservation Ontario participated in Part II of the Walkerton Inquiry by presenting position papers and submissions to the expert meetings and public hearings. In these briefings Conservation Ontario stressed the importance of: • Source protection (protecting the quality of drinking water supplies); ■ Managing water resources on a watershed basis; • Assisting responsibility for Ontario's water resources to one lead provincial ministry; • Additional stable sources of funding for watershed management; Members of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Task Forces (Mark Carroll and Steven Yourt) participated in the preparation and delivery of a presentation on the role of watershed management at the Inquiry's Toronto Town Hall Meeting. The Part II report provides recommendations for ensuring the safety of water supply systems in Ontario. Copies of the full report are available for download from the Commission's website (www.walkertoninquiry.com) wriILO • May 29, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #4/02 JK33 Key Recommendations from Part II of the Walkerton Inquiry: Watershed -based source protection plans should be required - Ideally should form part of a watershed management plan Provincial permitting and regulatory decisions must be consistent with source protection plan Municipal land use decisions must be consistent with the plan, where significant threats to source protection exist, and have regard to the plan in all other areas • MOE should be the lead agency with oversight responsibility for source protection plans Watershed Management Branch should be formed within the MOE MOE should also have oversight responsibility for protection of drinking water, under a Drinking Water Branch CA role should be recognized in coordinating the preparation of source protection plans CA role in local consultation is explicitly noted CA role in local implementation activities Decision on whether CAs should be moved to MOE from MNR is up to the provincial government; O'Connor doesn't believe that would be necessary though, in order for CAs to fulfil new responsibility Call for provincial, comprehensive "source to tap" water policy Province should ensure adequate funding for completion of source protection plans (and all other drinking water programs) - Funding should be derived from a combination of sources, including provincial tax base, user pay and polluter pay sources Province should develop guidelines to determine what is appropriately charged where Private well owners are recognized as having responsibility for the security of their own water supplies Province should provide and disseminate information to raise awareness and make water testing accessible PRESENTATIONS Introductory Sections Sharing a Vision...Sharing a Future, Gathering Ground — Draft 3 Karen Wianecki, Planning Solutions provided a brief presentation on the introductory sections to Draft 3 of the Watershed Strategy Document. Since draft 2, substantial changes had been made to the report structure and organization, the content, and the orientation. Karen walked through the report structure, the content changes, and requested comments on Draft 3 be forwarded to Joanne Jeffery at TRCA by June12, 2002. The final document would be prepared and presented at the last Task Force meeting planned for June 26, 2002. wrl: L May 29, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #4/02 JK34 Points of Discussion: Change the reference to Pickering Beach Road to Salem Road as the street name has changed. If there are errors or omissions please forward them to Joanne Jeffery before the June 5 & 6 public meetings. Any other comments will be received tup to June 12tH Include the Terms of Reference for the Task Force and their names in the document Move the Vision near the front of the document. Recommendations Sharing a Vision...Sharing a Future, Gathering Ground - Draft 3 Sonya Meek, TRCA, walked the members through Chapters 7 through 9 of Draft 3 of the Watershed Strategy Document. Chapter 7 identifies what the future pressures or changes the watersheds will be faced with, how they will be managed, and how they will meet the Vision. Sonya provided a handout entitled 8.3 Subwatershed Fact Sheets. This document took the high level recommendations and tailored them to the subwatersheds. Specific management recommendations and key management actions were identified for each subwatershed unit. Chapter 9 outlined the vehicles to implement the key management recommendations. This chapter will also address the Draft Policy Concepts which are being finalized. Points of Discussion: Karen Wianecki reviewed Chapter 6 and outlined the management philosophy, which sets the stage and puts things into context for chapters 7 -9. The philosophy explains in 5 key themes "what we are looking to do here ". A contact list should be included for "who does what" How will the ratings be addressed? Will you replicate ratings from other watershed strategies? Answer: The best professional estimate will be used. When applying these principles do they become an impediment to any development? It depends on the scale that you apply the objectives. Make revisions to the Watershed Wide Actions for Surface Water Quality that include promoting educational programs to limit the use of pesticides, recommend the Provincial government develop a regulation for the application of pesticides within municipalities, and encourage municipalities and residents to lobby the Provincial government to complete the regulation in a timely manner. NEW BUSINESS Doug Dodge informed the members that the Town of Ajax had discussed amending their Official Plan to accommodate the movement of their urban /suburban boundary north of Taunton Road. It will be debated again on June 17, 2002. May 29, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #4/02 JK35 NEXT MEETING The next and final meeting of the joint task force is scheduled for June 26, 2002 at the City of Pickering Civic Complex. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:10 p.m. on May 29, 2002. /jj Brian E. Denney J. Craig Mather Director, Watershed Management Secretary- Treasurer C TORONTO AND REGION "Y� onservation MINUTES OF THE JOINT DUFFINS CREEK AND CARRUTHERS CREEK WATERSHEDS TASK FORCES #5/02 June 26, 2002 Page JK36 The Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watersheds Task Forces met at the Pickering Civic Complex Wednesday June 26, 2002. Dick O'Brien, Chair of The Toronto Region Conservation Authority, called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. PRESENT Neil Acton Member - Carruthers Jane Brooke Member - Carruthers Mark Carroll Vice -Chair - Duffins Scott Crawford Vice -Chair - Carruthers Pat Brown Member - Carruthers Joe Dickson Member - Duffins Doug Dodge Member - Duffins Jackie Fraser Member - Duffins Deanna Fry Member - Duffins Alan Kimble Member - Duffins Gordon McKay Member - Carruthers Cindy Mitton - Wilkie Member - Carruthers John Nemeth Chair - Duffins Susan Para Member - Duffins Steve Parish Member - Duffins - Carruthers David Pickles Member - Duffins - Carruthers Patricia Short-Galls Member - Duffins Judy Sullivan Member - Duffins Steven Yourt Member - Carruthers GUESTS Alan Wells Chief Administrative Officer, York Region Steve Gaunt City of Pickering Karen Wianecki Planning Solutions Tim Rance Ministry of Natural Resources Tom Jones Miller Paving STAFF Dick O'Brien Chair, TRCA Gary Bowen Watershed Specialist Joanne Jeffery Watershed Strategy Assistant Michelle Zynwala Administrative Assistant June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK37 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Dick O'Brien brought the meeting to order and welcomed members and guests including Alan Wells from York Region. RES. #JK28/02 MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: D. Dodge M. Carroll THAT the Minutes of Meeting #4/02 be approved CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE A letter dated June 12, 2002 to John Nemeth, Chair, Duffins Creek Task Force from Andrew Jackson, Operations and Environmental Services, Town of Ajax requested that a Duffins Creek Task Force member be appointed to the Advisory Committee for the Greenwood Conservation Area Management Plan. Judy Sullivan has accepted the appointment to represent the Duffins Creek Task Force on the committee. A letter will be sent to Andrew Jackson, Town of Ajax to reflect this decision. INFORMATION Information items were reviewed and three were held for further discussion as follows: State of the Watershed Reports Gary thanked Authority staff whose work was invaluable in getting us to where we are today. He also thanked Ronald Domerchie who worked very hard on the design and layout of the chapters. Samples of the State of the Watershed chapters were available for viewing at the meeting. A Management Strategy for the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watersheds Dick O'Brien thanked Karen Wianecki, the writer, for her important contribution to the Management Strategy Report for the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watersheds. The agenda that was couriered out to the Task Force members contained a close to final draft of the watershed strategy. Minor editorial changes were made and updated copies were made available at the meeting. It was noted that major revisions were not expected due to municipal and agency staff involvement throughout the process. However, if major revisions were requested over the summer and before presentations to Councils this fall, TRCA staff would wins "3 June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK38 consult with the Chairs and Vice Chairs of the Task Forces to see if the changes are significant enough to warrant the re- convening of the Task Forces. Gary thanked the Planning Departments, members of the Task Forces, interest groups, . agencies and citizens for their support, commitment and hard work over the past two years. A Task Force Appreciation Dinner is being planned for October 2002. The final desktop version of the Management Strategy will be presented to each member of the Task Forces at that time. Paulynn Park Event, July 12 & 13, 2002 Gary explained that a media launch celebrating the accomplishments of the last two years will be held on July 12 at Paulynn Park in Ajax. Family events planned on July 12 and 13 include: "River Keeper under the Stars" slide presentation by Ron Holloway from Hampshire, England, stream rehabilitation, environmental displays, electro- fishing demonstrations, and children's crafts. Joanne Jeffery added that the Authority will be hosting similar events in other parts of the watershed including: the City of Pickering, Town of Whitchurch - Stouffville, and the Township of Uxbridge. Members were encouraged by Dick O'Brien to take flyers to help promote this event. RES. #JK29/02 FISH MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE Moved by: Seconded by: J. Nemeth S. Crawford THAT the staff report on the Fish Management Plan be received CARRIED BACKGROUND Development of Fisheries Management Plans (FMPs) for both watersheds began in conjunction with the Strategy document in 2000. The goal is for each FMP to be used as a resource document that will guide the implementation of regeneration projects and will serve as a tool in the planning process. The process of preparing FMPs for each watershed has involved the collection of biological and technical data, public and technical group meetings as well as discussions with anglers and angling clubs. Analysis of the background biological and physical data and the input from the public has led to the characterization of the watercourses within each system into one of seven Habitat Potential categories. These categories describe how the aquatic system in the watershed would have likely functioned historically, and establishes the basis for future management direction of the aquatic resource. One of the significant components of future management is the interaction between native, resident brook trout and migratory rainbow trout and chinook salmon, which were introduced from the west coast. User groups want to have sport fishing opportunities for both resident and migratory species, which necessitates dividing the watershed into management zones. A consensus has been reached that the maintenance of barriers north of Whitevale on the West Duffins Creek and north of Highway 7 on the East Duffins Creek will meet the goals of allowing migratory rainbow trout and chinook salmon into areas where they can spawn successfully while also maintaining populations of native brook trout, redside dace and other resident species upstream. The maintenance of these barriers is also important for future attempts to reintroduce Atlantic-salmon to Duffins Creek. WelS June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK39 Strategic direction for each of the eight management zones will be provided on a subwatershed basis, where the FMP will identify significant issues, fish habitat and describe what needs to be done in terms of riparian planting, barrier mitigation, on -line pond removal, angling regulations, stocking, and other fisheries issues to achieve the desired aquatic community. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE A draft FMP for each watershed will be completed by mid -July, after which they will undergo further review by a technical group consisting of agency staff, angling clubs and the public. A final document will be ready in September. RES. #JK30 /02 DUFFINS HEADWATERS MANAGEMENT PLAN Moved by: Seconded by: J. Nemeth S. Crawford THAT the staff report on the Duffins Headwaters Management Plan be received CARRIED BACKGROUND The Duffins Headwaters planning area, which includes the Goodwood Resource Management Tract, Secord Forest and Wildlife Area, Clubine Agreement Forest, Walker Woods Tract, Former Timbers Brothers Gravel Pit, Glen Major Resource Management Tract and Claremont Field Centre, totals 1950 hectares of land. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) owns all of the land, with the exception of 72 hectares in the Glen Major Resource Management Tract, which is owned by the Ontario Heritage Foundation and managed by the TRCA. At Authority Meeting #7/99, held on September 24, 1999, Resolution #A246/99 was adopted: "THAT staff be directed to proceed with the development of a Glen Major Complex Management Plan; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to establish an Advisory Committee, which would include members of the public, interested community groups, the Township of Uxbridge, Town of Pickering, and Durham Region to assist with the development of the Management Plan and facilitate the opportunity for public input." June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK40 The objective of the Duffins Headwaters Management Plan process was to involve the community and work cooperatively toward examining the lands and determining their environmental features and functions, heritage values, and their potential for appropriate recreation or other public uses. It has been planned that in the final phase of the management plan process the Duffins and Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy will be integrated to establish a comprehensive plan for the management of specific TRCA owned properties, recommend important land stewardship practices and identify important linkages between TRCA properties. Representatives from the following agencies and community groups were invited to participate on the Management Plan Advisory Committee: Ministry of Natural Resources, Aurora District - Staff; Ministry of Citizenship, Culture and Tourism - Staff; Durham Region, City of Pickering, Township of Uxbridge - Staff and Councillors; Durham Region Police - Staff; Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority - Staff; Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority - Staff; Ontario Heritage Foundation - Staff; Federation of Ontario Naturalists; Hike Ontario; Ontario Trails Council; Oak Ridges Moraine Trail Association; Uxbridge Cycling Association; Uxbridge Citizens for Conservation; Uxbridge Conservation Association; Pickering Conservation Association; Pickering Rural Association; Walker Property; Secord Property; The Glen Major Angling Club; Goodwood Farms; Dagmar Ski Resort; International Mountain Biking Association (Ontario Chapter). MANAGEMENT PLAN PROCESS The Management Plan was undertaken in five phases. In the first phase, general management zones for all the properties were established. In phases 2 through 4, detailed site specific recommendations were developed, based on the priority areas. The last phase of the management plan process is the integration of the plan with the Duffins Creek Watershed Strategy. PHASES Phase 1 1. Prepare Background Report 2. Establish advisory Committee 3. Develop Project Terms of Reference. 4. Develop Plan Vision. 5. Host Public Information Session. June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK41 6. Determine Draft General Management Zones such as, Nature Reserve, Natural Environment, Primary Restoration and Public Use for all TRCA properties. 7. Determine Draft Trans Canada Trail (TCT) Alignment. 8. Public Meeting to Review Draft General Management Zones and TCT Alignment. 9. Finalize General Management Zones. - Phase 2 - 1. Determine Detailed Management Zone Recommendations for Priority Area One: Glen Major Resource Management Tract; Walker Woods; Former Timbers Brothers Gravel Pit. 2. Host Public Meeting to Review Draft Management Zone Recommendations. 3. Finalize Priority Area One Management Zone Recommendations. Phase 3 1. Determine Detailed Management Zone Recommendations for Priority Area Two: Goodwood /Secord /Clubine properties. 2. Host Public Meeting to Review Draft Management Zone Recommendations. 3. Finalize Priority Area Two Management Zone Recommendations. Phase 4 1. Determine Detailed Management Zone Recommendations for Priority Area Three: Claremont Field Centre Property 2. Host Public Meeting to Review Draft Management Zone Recommendations. 3. Finalize Priority Area Three Management Zone Recommendations. Phase 5 1. Integrate Priority Areas and Management Recommendations. 2. Link Management Plan to Duffins Creek Watershed Strategy: Integrate Management Recommendations; Linked Resource Protection & Restoration; Balanced Public Use; TRCA/ Municipal/ Private Land Stewardship; Potential TRCA Property Acquisition /Conservation Easements. 3. Final Public Meeting to Present Integrated Management Plan. 4. Advisory Committee Endorsement of Management Plan. 5. Management Plan Review with Other Government Agencies. 6. Authority Approval of Management Plan. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE TRCA staff and the Management Plan Advisory Committee have completed the first 4 Phases of the planning process. It is anticipated that Phase 5 will be completed by the end of September 2002, with the launch of the Management Plan being combined with the launch of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watershed Strategy. June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK42 RES. #JK31/02 .GREENWOOD CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Moved by: Seconded by: J. Nemeth S. Crawford THAT the staff report on the Greenwood Conservation Area Management Plan be received; AND FURTHER THAT Judy Sullivan be appointed to represent the Duffins Creek Task Force on the Greenwood Conservation Area Management Plan Advisory Committee CARRIED BACKGROUND The Greenwood Conservation Area comprises approximately 283 hectares of greenspace on Duffins Creek, which is located in the Regional Municipality of Durham, Town of Ajax and City of Pickering. On May 1, 1999, the TRCA and the Town of Ajax reached agreement on the management of approximately 222 hectares of the Greenwood Conservation Area. The agreement period was established for one year with an option to renew by mutual consent (and it has been renewed on an annual basis since that time). The Town of Ajax immediately opened the Conservation Area for public access seven days a week and provided a significant staff presence to maintain and improve the area. TRCA continues to manage the remaining 61 hectares, located in the City of Pickering. As part of the management agreement, the Town of Ajax has agreed to prepare an overall management plan for the lands under agreement, addressing the long term use and management of the lands by the municipality. The following resolution was passed by the General Government Committee at its meeting held February 7, 2002, and endorsed by Ajax Town Council at its meeting held February 11, 2002. "That Council approve the draft proposal and work plan for the Greenwood Conservation Area Management Plan and staff be directed to proceed with the development of the Management plan as outlined in this report and further that Council contract the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to assist in the development of the management plan at a cost not to exceed $20,000.00." The Town of Ajax has also agreed that the management plan approach for Greenwood Conservation Area will follow the TRCA model that has been utilized very successfully at Claireville, Boyd North and Glassco Park, and TRCA properties in the Duffins Creek Headwaters. At the TRCA Public Use Advisory Board meeting #3/02, held on June 7, 2002, Resolution #E15/02 was adopted: "THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT staff be directed to assist the Town of Ajax with the development of a Greenwood Conservation Area Management Plan; June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK43 THAT staff be directed to establish an Advisory Committee, which would include members of the public, interested community groups, the Town of Ajax and the City of Pickering to assist with the development of the Management Plan and facilitate the opportunity for public input; THAT the management agreement with the Town of Ajax for the Greenwood Conservation Area be renewed for one year; AND FURTHER THAT Authority staff work with municipal staff towards consolidating these lands and other suitable green space lands under a comprehensive management agreement with the Town of Ajax." RATIONALE Many of the Plans which the TRCA developed for Greenwood Conservation Area are over ten years old. The changes in the availability of public funds, evolving concepts in conservation and recreation planning, and advances in ecosystem based planning have highlighted the need to review previous plans and prepare an updated comprehensive and integrated management plan for the property. It is an appropriate time to complete a management plan for the Greenwood Conservation Area due to the change in active management of the lands from TRCA to the Town of Ajax. In addition, with the projected population growth surrounding the Conservation Area, Greenwood will become a major environmental, outdoor recreation and tourism centre that requires a current management plan which can address future public use demands and enhanced environmental protection. A management planning process for the Greenwood Conservation Area is also timely and will complement a number of TRCA initiatives including: The Duffins Creek & Carruthers Creek Watershed Task Forces Detailed Route Planning and Implementation of the Trans Canada Trail. The objective of the Greenwood Conservation Area management plan process will be to examine the lands and determine their environmental features and functions, heritage values, and their potential for recreation or other public uses. This review will be used to establish a plan for the management of TRCA owned land, recommend important land stewardship practices and implement important Duffins Creek Watershed Strategy initiatives. RES. #JK32/02 THE STATE OF THE WATERSHED REPORTS Moved by: Seconded by: J. Nemeth S. Crawford THAT the staff report on the State of the Watershed Reports be received CARRIED June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK44 BACKGROUND Just prior to the Task Force formation in the summer of 2000, a Technical Advisory ' Committee was struck to compile existing information on the Duffins and Carruthers Creek watersheds. As an outcome of these studies, State of the Watershed reports have been prepared for both watersheds. They provide a summary of existing conditions for the watersheds for the following topics: • Introduction • Study Area • Human Heritage • Greenspace, Trails and Recreation • Land Use • Air Quality • Climate Change • Surface Water Quality • Surface Water Quantity • Stormwater Management • Fluvial Geomorphology • Hydrogeology • Aquatic Habitats • Terrestrial Natural Heritage The Vision, Management Philosophy and Integral Management Actions for the Duffins and Carruthers Creek watersheds were developed based on the information contained in the State of the Watershed Reports. On Friday, July 12, 2002, the State of the Watershed reports will be formally announced to the public during a 2 p.m. media launch at Paulynn Park in the Town of Ajax. We invite all Task Force members to join us at the launch. Following the public release of the documents, printed copies of the State of the Watershed Reports will be available at public libraries and in the municipal planning offices within the watersheds. Digital copies will be forwarded to the Duffins and Carruthers Creek Task Force members. Electronic copies will be available for browsing or downloading off the TRCA web site at www.trca.on.ca, or go to one of the municipal websites within the Duffins and Carruthers Creek watersheds. In addition, electronic copies will be available on CD Rom from the TRCA by contacting us at (416) 661 -6600. RES. #JK33/02 PUBLIC MEETINGS - JUNE 5 AND 6, 2002 Moved by: Seconded by: J. Nemeth S. Crawford THAT the staff report on the June 5 and 6 public Open Houses be received W r1 I (PO June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK45 AND FURTHER THAT Sue Cumming, Cumming + Company be thanked for facilitating the meetings and ensuring that everyone had an opportunity to participate in the discussion. CARRIED BACKGROUND The second series of public open houses hosted by the puffins and Carruthers Creek Task Forces were held on Wednesday, June 5, at the Claremont Community Centre in the City of Pickering and on Thursday, June 6, at the Pickering Village United Church in the Town of Ajax. Both meetings were held from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. with a presentation at 7:30 p.m. Sue Cumming facilitated both meetings and TRCA Chair Dick O'Brien welcomed guests to the June 5 meeting at the Claremont Community Centre. Both meetings were well attended, and well received, with approximately 80 people over the two nights. Many people asked questions and participated in the discussions related to the future health of the Duffins and Carruthers Creek watersheds. Comments received at the meeting were taken into account when preparing the final Management Strategy for the Duffins and Carruthers Creek Watersheds. Staff have received a number of compliments since the meetings from stakeholders and residents that had attended. Presentations to municipal councils in the fall of 2002 will provide another opportunity for the public to voice their opinion regarding the Watershed Management Strategy. Stakeholders and residents are being encouraged to contact their municipal Councillors to express their support of this initiative. RES. #JK34/02 PAULYNN PARK EVENT, July 12 and 13, 2002 Moved by: Seconded by: J. Nemeth S. Crawford THAT the flyer provided as an information item on page 21 in the June 26, 2002 Agenda package be received CARRIED RES. #JK35/02 A MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR THE DUFFINS CREEK AND CARRUTHERS CREEK WATERSHEDS Moved by: Seconded by: J. Nemeth S. Crawford THAT A Management Strategy for the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watersheds be received; THAT TRCA staff contact municipal staff and key stakeholders during July and August 2002 to formalize protocols for implementing the report, to prepare reports to Council and letters of endorsement respectively; k)rl1l)i1 June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK46 THAT the final report be forwarded to members of the Duffins and Carruthers Creek Task Force members prior to its presentation to municipal councils in the fall of 2002; THAT the writer, Karen Wianecki, municipal and agency, and TRCA staff be thanked for their time and commitment in preparing the document; AND FURTHER THAT the Chairs of the Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Task Forces submit correspondence to Dick O'Brien, Chair of TRCA to confirm they have met the obligations of the Task Forces mandate CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Task Force meeting #4/02 held on May 29, 2002 Karen Wianecki of Planning Solutions provided a brief presentation on the introductory sections to Draft 3 of the Watershed Strategy Document. Since draft 2, substantial changes had been made to the report structure and organization, the content and the orientation. Karen walked through the report structure, the content changes, and requested comments on Draft 3 be forwarded to Joanne Jeffery at TRCA by June12, 2002. The final document would be prepared and presented at the last Task Force meeting planned for June 26, 2002. At the same meeting, Sonya Meek, TRCA, walked the members through Chapters 7 through 9 of Draft 3 of the Watershed Strategy Document. Chapter 7 identifies what the future pressures or changes the watersheds will be faced with, how they will be managed, andhow they will meet the Vision. In addition, Sonya provided a handout entitled 8.3 Subwatershed Fact Sheets. This document took the high level recommendations and tailored them to the subwatersheds. Specific management recommendations and key management actions were identified for each subwatershed unit. Chapter 9 outlined the vehicles to implement the key management recommendations. It was noted that chapter 9 would include the Watershed Policy Concepts which were being finalized for June 26. RATIONALE The final watershed strategy for Duffins and Carruthers reflects the comments and directions the writer and TRCA staff have received from watershed residents, stakeholders, municipal staff and Task Force Members since May 29, 2002. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Following the presentations to the Municipal councils and Regional councils in the fall of 2002, printed copies of the Watershed Strategy will be available at public libraries and in the municipal planning offices within the watersheds. Digital copies will be forwarded to the Duffins and Carruthers Creek Task Force members. Electronic copies will be available for browsing or downloading off the TRCA web site at www.trca.on.ca, or go to one of the municipal websites within the Duffins and Carruthers Creek watersheds. In addition, electronic copies will be available on CD Rom from the TRCA by contacting us at (416) 661 -6600. Wf1I(pt June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK47 STATEMENTS OF APPRECIATON John Nemeth, Chair - Duffins Task Force John thanked Chair Dick O'Brien for chairing the meeting and thanked all participants for their efforts. He is proud of the report put together and hopes to share information from it with other watersheds. On behalf of Neil Burnett, Chair of the Carruthers Task Force and himself, he thanked the Authority staff and everyone for their commitment to this project. He is looking forward to moving into the implementation phase. Neil Burnett, Chair - Carruthers Task Force Neil Burnett was out of county but forwarded on a note to be read. John Nemeth read his remarks: "When John reads this out / will no doubt be sleeping peacefully after a good night in my old local pub, deep in the Yorkshire Dales in England. I just want to express my appreciation for everyone's efforts in the development of this strategy, which will become a very valuable and highly used document for all stakeholders as we move forward to protect and enhance these watersheds. It has been a great pleasure for me to have met you all and to have worked together for such a good purpose. I hope we will renew our acquaintances as we move into the implementation phase." Mark Carroll, Vice Chair - Duffins Task Force Mark noted that it was a great learning experience being on the Task Force and thanked everyone involved. He is in full support of this report and looks forward to taking it back to council to help protect other watersheds in the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville. Deanna Fry, Duffins Task Force Deanna stated how well all the people involved worked together and hopes there will be an opportunity to continue working together for the implementation phase, which is a critical phase in the project. Chair Dick O'Brien in his closing comments emphasized the importance of volunteers and that all agencies have to work together. He stated that the glue in any of these organizations is the volunteers / citizens. Without them, we do not accomplish anything. They make the difference. To illustrate this, Dick O'Brien mentioned the Justice O'Connor's Walkerton Inquiry Part 2 Report which was the first report that recognized watersheds and conservation authorities. It was citizens and volunteers on the various TRCA Councils / Task Forces that supported the submissions of this report. He thanked all involved of a job well done and is looking forward to the next steps in the strategy implementation. NEW BUSINESS TRCA will be notifying the Task Forces of the date and time for the Appreciation day to be held in October 2002. j rii&3 June 26, 2002 DUFFINS & CARRUTHERS WATERSHED TASK FORCES #5/02 JK48 NEXT MEETING This was the final meeting of the Duffins Creek Task Force and the Carruthers Creek Task Force. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 7:40 p.m. on June 26, 2002. /mz Brian E. Denney J. Craig Mather Director, Watershed Management Secretary- Treasurer THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MINUTES OF THE ETOBICOKE AND MIMICO CREEK WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 September 26, 2002 Page H1 The Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Coalition met at Montgomery's Inn, on Thursday, September 26, 2002. Interim Chair, Irene Jones, called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. PRESENT Chris Barnett Member Suzanne Barrett Member Cleve Battick Member Lorna Bissell Member Karen English Member Eugene Furgiuele Alternate Bette -Ann Goldstein Member Gerry Gorman Member Michael Gusche Alternate Cliff Gyles Member Marilyn Hagerman Member Robert Jamieson Member Irene Jones Interim Chair Diana Karrandjas Member Susan McClure Member Randy McGiII Member Chris McGlynn Member John McMahon Alternate Doug McRonney Member Dick Metzak Member Vojka Miladinovic Alternate Chris Nelson Member Bob Noble Member John Pisapio Member Sean Stuart Member Boris Swedak Member David Switzer Member Jennifer Turgeon Member Laura Von Zittwitz Alternate Andrea Warren Alternate GUESTS H2 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1102 Sept. 26, 2002 Marjut Dunker South Etobicoke Regeneration Project John Hirsch Former Chair, Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force Tanya Trivedi Ecosource Mississauga STAFF Kristin Geater Etobicoke - Mimico Watershed Resource Planner Lia Lappano Etobicoke - Mimico Administrative Assistant Craig Mather Chief Administrative Officer Bernie McIntyre Manager, Strategic Development Beth Williston Etobicoke - Mimico Watershed Specialist Paul Willms Etobicoke - Mimico Watershed Resource Planner INTRODUCTION AND WELCOME Everyone in attendance introduced themselves. Craig Mather, TRCA's Chief Administrative Officer welcomed the new member as well as the returning members to Coalition. CORRESPONDENCE (a) News release from Parks Canada, dated June 21, 2002, re: Proclamation of Canadian Rivers Day (b) Letter from Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, dated September 3, 2002 re: Ontario Smart Growth (c) Letter from the Don Regeneration Council to City of Toronto, dated September 16, 2002, re: Harmonized City Wide Ravine By -Law RES. #H1/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Gerry Gorman Doug McRonney THAT the above correspondence be received CARRIED 1/ 1 I to (P Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H3 TERMS OF REFERENCE AND COALITION ROLES B. Williston gave a brief overview of the Terms of Reference for the Etobicoke - Mimico Creek Watersheds Coalition as well as the mandate and role of the Coalition. PRESENTATIONS (a) The Living City B. McIntyre briefly described the Living City and how it relates to the work of the Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Coalition. (b) Greening Our Watersheds J. Hirsch presented an overview of the watershed strategy document, "Greening Our Watersheds ". RES. #H2/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: GREENING OUR WATERSHEDS: REVITALIZATION STRATEGIES FOR ETOBICOKE AND MIMICO CREEK WATERSHEDS Receipt of the management strategy document for the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds entitled, "Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks, including the Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card ", endorsement of the five priorities for action and signing of the Etobicoke - Mimico Pledge. Chris Barnett Cliff Gyles THAT the document entitled, Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks, including the Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card, be received; THAT the five priorities for action (improve water management, promote sustainable communities, secure green open spaces, expand environmental education, and protect and restore natural habitats) recommended by the former Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks Watersheds Task Force be endorsed; AND FURTHER THAT the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition sign the Etobicoke- Mimico Pledge CARRIED BACKGROUND jrlI(7 H4 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept. 26, 2002 Greening Our Watersheds On May 24, 2002, The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority formally endorsed the management strategy for the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watersheds entitled, Greening Our Watersheds (Res. #A120/02). Also at that time, the Authority approved the Terms of Reference for the establishment of the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition (Res. #A124/02). The terms of reference is based on the Watersheds Coalition indicator, as found on page 280 of the strategy document itself. As defined in the terms of reference, the role of the Watersheds Coalition is to respect, protect and regenerate the Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek watersheds and, more specifically, to assist the Authority, the Conservation Foundation of Greater Toronto, other agencies, and the public: i) with the implementation of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force report titled, "Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks ". ii) with the implementation of the recommendations of the Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan contained in Clean Waters, Clear Choices: Recommendations for Action as they pertain to the Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek watersheds; and, iii) with the implementation of the actions required to address the targets identified in the document titled, "Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks ", which includes the 2001 Etobicoke - Mimico Report Card. Coaltion Priorities for Action: At the final meeting of the task force, resolution #H92/01 was passed. In part, this resolution reads: THAT the Etoboicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force recommend to the future Watersheds Coalition that the five priorites for action be: • to improve water management • to promote sustainable communities • to secure green open spaces • to expand environmental education • to protect and restore natural habitats Chapter 9 of Greening Our Watersheds provides the retionalle as to why each of these priorities was selected by the task force. Detailed actions related to each recommended priority can be found within the management strategies themselves (Chapters 6, 7 and 8). The Etobicoke - Mimico Pledge: Developed by the task force for signing by community groups, businesses, municipalities, the Authority and other interested parties, the pledge reads: wr1i(1)5 Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H5 We share a vision of the future of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watersheds as places where: people live in harmony with the environment; the water is clean natural habitats are vital and connected; and fish and wildlife thrive. We (organization) pledge ourselves to making this vision reality by: Respecting, Protecting and Regenerating the natural and human heritage of these watersheds. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Staff to complete the formal pledge for signing by the Chair of the Coalition, once formally elected. RES. #H3/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: INTERIM WATERSHED TEAMS Approval of recommended interim watershed teams of the Watersheds Coalition be established as Water Management, Sustainable Communities and Securement of Open Spaces, Education, and Natural Habitats, as recommended by the former Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Task Force. Doug McRonney Boris Swedak THAT four interim working groups be established by the Watersheds Coalition as Water Management, Sustainable Communities and Securement of Open Spaces, Education and Heritage, and Natural Habitats; THAT these interim working groups develop five -year work plans (2002 -2006) to implement management strategies related to each priority for action; THAT these work plans be integrated and a final Watersheds Coalition Team structure be established that will facilitate implementation of the integrated work plan; THAT the work plan development, integration, and finalization of the Watersheds Coalition Team structure be completed in the first six months of the Watershed Coalition's existence; toll to'j H6 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept. 26, 2002 AND FURTHER THAT the future Watersheds Coalition consider establishing the following working groups in its final structure: Watershed Planning, Watershed Reporting, Communications and Outreach (including Education and Heritage), and Revenue Generation and Fund - raising CARRIED BACKGROUND At meeting #8101 of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force, Sue Cumming of Cumming and Company facilitated a workshop aimed at designing a structure for the future Watersheds Coalition. Workshop participants agreed that there was a need to establish an interim structure for the future Watersheds Coalition, and that a final structure be determined once a detailed work plan for the Watersheds Coalition is prepared. At meeting #9/01 of the Task Force, members discussed the results of this workshop and recommended that an interim structure for the Watersheds Coalition be established, and that working groups be tasked with establishing work plans that will be integrated and used to determine the final Watersheds Coalition structure. RATIONALE The interim Watersheds Coalition structure recommended by the former task force is based on the five priorities for action that are recommended in the final chapter of Greening Our Watersheds. These priorities are: • Improve water management, • Promote sustainable communities, • Secure green open spaces, • Expand environmental education, and • Protect and restore natural habitats Through discussion, Task Force members agreed that four interim working groups should be formed as follows: • Water Management • Sustainable Communities and Green Open Spaces • Education /Heritage • Natural Habitats These four working groups should be established at meeting #1 /02 of the Watersheds Coalition, and assigned the task of developing and integrating work plans for each of the priority actions, and determining a final structure for the Watersheds Coalition within their first four months of existence. In establishing the Watershed Coalition membership, all candidates were asked to choose their preferred working group. In cases where members selected more than one group, staff reviewed both qualifications and group size and assigned membership. wi17D Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H7 Proposed working group members are as follows: WATER MANAGEMENT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES' EDUCATION /HERITAGE NATURAL HABITATS Suzanne Barrett Nick deBoer Cleve Battick /Steve Chris Barnett Stephen Cliffe Marjut Dunker Rutherford Lorna Bissell Irene Jones Karen English Janice Etter Gerry Gorman John Kendall Cliff Gyles Bette Ann Goldstein Marilyn Hagerman Randy McGill Chris McGlynn Susan McClure Robert Jamieson John Pisapio Doug McRonney David Switzer Diana Karrandjas Tanya Trivedi Boris Swedak Jennifer Turgeon Dick Metzak Debbie Wagdin Chris Nelson Bob Noble Sean Stuart In developing the final structure, Watersheds Coalition members should consider the structure recommended by one of the breakout groups at the workshop of task force meeting #8/01. That structure is as follows: • Watershed Planning • Watershed Reporting • Communications and Outreach (including Education and Heritage) • Revenue Generation and Fund - raising WORK TO BE DONE • All Coalition members are to be assigned to a watershed team and meeting dates for October and December are to be set for each team; • Draft workplans are to be prepared by each team for Coalition meeting #1/03 in January, 2003. • A facilitated workshop will be conducted at the January meeting to integrate the work plans and to develop a final structure for the Watershed Teams. • Approval of the recommended Team structure and integrated work plan is scheduled for the March Coalition meeting. RES. #H4/02 - Moved by. Seconded by: COMMUNITY ACTION AREAS UPDATE To provide an overview of the existing community action areas and to outline future community action area initiatives. David Switzer Lorna.Bissell THAT the staff report on community action areas be received; IA) MI"1 I H8 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept. 26, 2002 THAT a detailed report on the three existing community action areas (Heart Lake, Malton, South Mimico) be provided to the Coalition at Meeting #2/02; AND FURTHER THAT a work plan detailing the development of additional community action area plans be submitted to the Coalition for approval at Meeting #2/02 CARRIED BACKGROUND Community action areas and their plans are intended to be the vehicle for implementing the watershed management strategy at the community level. Their development and implementation is intended to foster community awareness and support, to promote backyard change, and to serve as an avenue for funding. Successful implementation of the watershed strategies through the community action area plans is dependant upon a number of factors coming together. These factors include municipal and agency support, community support and involvement, technical support, and funding. Extensive consultation with all partners is essential. Developing the plans is based on the theories of consensus and capacity building. Implementing the plans is dependent on a core group of community volunteers for each area. At the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force meeting #2/00, reach plans were discussed and the following resolution was endorsed: "THAT Authority staff proceed, in consultation with the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force, to define the boundary of reaches within the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watersheds and to compile base information within each boundary. AND FURTHER THAT Authority staff report back to the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force with the results in the Fall, 2000." These reaches were redefined to include adjacent table lands and were renamed community action areas. At Task Force meeting #10/00, the community action area plans were discussed and the following resolution was endorsed: "THAT the Task Force develop community action area plans as a tool for use in implementing the watershed management strategies at the community level; THAT community action area plans be developed by the Task Force for the following areas and incorporated in the watershed management strategy document that will be developed: Mimico Creek - Mouth to Bloor Street, Heart Lake, and Malton; THAT the Task Force's Working Groups develop draft community action area plans for the above areas, to illustrate how and what management strategies should be implemented at the community level; Wrii7Z Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H9 That the Working Groups report back to the Task Force in Spring 2001 with their draft community action area plans, and that a workshop be held during a subsequent Task Force meeting to integrate these plans; THAT opportunities for public consultation be provided and comments incorporated accordingly; THAT the final community action area plans be incorporated in the watershed management strategy document, with appropriate text to be developed by the writer. AND FURTHER THAT future Watershed Alliances be requested to continue to develop community action area plans within the watersheds to correspond with need, timing, and funding availability." Subsequent to that meeting, Community Action Areas and their associated plans were developed in three Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watershed reaches: • Heart Lake Community Action Area • Malton Community Action Area • Mimico Creek - Mouth to Bloor Street Community Action Area (renamed: South Mimico Community Action Area) Over time, a further 16 community action areas will be developed, covering the entire area of both watersheds. These will be developed as need arises, and funding and timing opportunities are presented. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Staff to develop a work plan detailing the timing for development of the remaining 16 Community Action Areas between 2003 and 2006; • Staff to produce a report about the existing Heart Lake, Malton, and South Mimico community action areas, summarizing the work that has been undertaken to date and recommending future actions based on the approved community action area plans; and • Once approved by the Coalition, the Community Action Areas will be established with appropriate community members as opportunities arise. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding to proceed with the development of community action area work plans, reports, and plans is proposed in the 2003 budget and will continue to be a priority in future budget submissions until all 16 plans are complete. IA) r1i73 H10 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept 26, 2002 RES. #H5/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: COMMUNITY ACTION SITES UPDATE To provide an overview of the existing community action site (Bonar Wetland). Diana Karrandjas Chris Barnett THAT the staff report on community action sites be received; AND FURTHER THAT a detailed report on the Bonar Community Action Site be provided to the Coalition at Meeting #2102 CARRIED BACKGROUND At Task Force meeting #10/00, the following resolution was endorsed: "THAT the Task Force develop community action site plans as a tool for use in implementing the watershed management strategies at the site level with community involvement; That community action site plans be developed by the Task Force for the following areas: - Mouth of Mimico Creek; - Van Dusen Corridor; - Heart Lake Conservation Area; and - Malton Greenway; THAT the Task Force's Working Groups develop draft community action site plans for the above areas, to illustrate how and what management strategies should be implemented at the site level; That the Working Groups report back to the Task Force in Spring 2001 with their draft community action site plans, end that a workshop be held during a subsequent Task Force meeting to integrate these plans. THAT opportunities for public consultation be provided and comments incorporated accordingly; THAT the final community action site plans be incorporated in the watershed management strategy document, with appropriate text to be developed by the writer. AND FURTHER THAT future Watershed Alliances be requested to continue to develop community action site plans." wnrlli Sept 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H11 To date, one area has been determined to be a community action site - Bonar Wetland. The Van Dusen Corridor had been developed as a community action site, but this was later rescinded because the project did not meet the community action site criteria. At meeting #7/01, the following resolution was endorsed: THAT the Heart Lake, Malton and South Mimico Community Action Area plans and the Bonar Community Action Site Plan be approved by the Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force; THAT final edits to the plans, pursuant to Editorial Subcommittee recommendations, be prepared for September, 2001; AND FURTHER THAT the plans be incorporated into Greening Our Watersheds during the Layout and Design process." RATIONALE The development and implementation of watershed management strategies is a nested approach. Management strategies are developed that describe what should be done to improve watershed health; community action area plans are intended to be the vehicle for implementing the watershed management strategy at the community level; and community action sites are intended to be the vehicle for implementing the watershed management strategy at the site level through the community. The development and implementation of community action site plans is intended to foster community awareness and support, and to serve as an avenue for funding. Similar to the action plans, successful implementation of the watershed strategies through the community action site plans is dependant upon a number of factors coming together. These factors include municipal and agency support, community support and involvement, technical support, and funding. Extensive consultation with all partners is essential. Developing the plans is based on the theories of consensus and capacity building. Implementing the plans is dependent on a core group of community volunteers for each area. Within each community action area, community action site plans will be developed for each a number of different locations. Sites that are considered candidates for community action site planning must have a number of factors. Two key factors are (1) opportunities to integrate a number of the watershed management strategies in one location, and (2) opportunities to involve the public in a safe and meaningful way. The following projects are recommended as community action sites to be developed by the Task Force and included in the watershed management strategy document: • Heart Lake Conservation Area; • Malton Greenway, including the Brandongate Corridor; and • Mouth of Mimico Creek. w t1 S H12 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept. 26, 2002 Each of these sites is located within the recommended community action areas, and at least part of each site has previously been endorsed by the Task Force as a community action site. It is intended that community action site plans for additional areas will be developed by subsequent Watershed Alliances. These action sites would not necessarily need to be part of a community action area planning initiative. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Staff to produce a report about the existing community action site, summarizing the work that has been undertaken to date and recommending future actions based on the approved community action site plan. Additional community action sites will be recommended to the Coalition for endorsement as the opportunity arises. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding to proceed with the development of the Bonar Community Action Site on an interim basis is available, although complete project funds have not been achieved. Funding to develop additional community action sites must be prioritized and budgeted for through the TRCA for all upcoming years. RES. #H6/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: REGENERATION PROJECTS UPDATE To provide an overview of current regeneration projects. Doug McRonney Cleve Battick THAT the staff report on current regeneration projects be received; AND FURTHER THAT a detailed report on the current regeneration projects be provided to the Coalition at Meeting #2/02. AMENDMENT RES. #H7/02 Moved by: Seconded by: David Switzer Suzanne Barrett THAT a representative from the Toronto Golf Club be invited to attend a future Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Coalition meeting and provide an update on the status of the regeneration works on their property. Wr1l7b Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1102 H13 THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND Regeneration projects are site specific in nature and have been developed through a variety of ways, for example through community lobbying (e.g. Loafer's Lake); being recommended in the relevant community action area plan (e.g. Mimico Estates); as opportunities are presented (e.g. Royal York); or as required for flood and erosion control purposes (e.g. Van Dusen). The following is a list of all regeneration projects that are currently being undertaken by the TRCA in the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds. Project Watershed Description Brampton Channel Naturalization Etobicoke Creek - undertake a feasibility study to identify the channel naturalization options available, then proceed with detailed design and eventually naturalization Etobicoke Mimico Renaturalization Program Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks - site inventory of watersheds - prioritize habitat restoration /creation sites - develop regeneration plans for sites and implementation Headwaters Naturalization Program Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks - riparian plantings for water quality and habitat improvements - enhance aquatic habitat Heart Lake Horseshoe Wetland Etobicoke Creek - expand the size of an existing wetland pocket by establishing a no -mow zone, extensive plantings, and linking the wetland with adjacent forest habitat Heart Lake Shoreline Restoration - East Side Etobicoke Creek - replace existing gabion basket lined shore with a natural shoreline, provide aquatic habitat features, construct a boardwalk, planting of a sand dune Loafer's Lake Rehabilitation Etobicoke Creek - develop a naturalization plan for the eastern shore and plant with community Malton Greenway Naturalization Mimico Creek - community naturalization project focussing on extending the riparian zone through this urban neighbourhood Mayfield Road Renaturalization Project Etobicoke Creek - wetland restoration northwest of Mayfield Road and Heart Lake Road, and associated programs for private landowners toll? H14 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept 26, 2002 Hydro Lands Regeneration Site Mimico Creek - enhance riparian and terrestrial habitat with community Pratt & Whitney Naturalization Etobicoke Creek - corporate involvement in riparian, forest and wetland habitat creation Reid Manor Park Mimico Creek - reforestation, trail re- development, erosion control Royal York Mimico Creek - reforestation, riparian habitat enhancement, trail development Snelgrove Master Plan Implementation Etobicoke Creek - detailed design of project components: stormwater management, riparian plantings, terrestrial habitat enhancement, pond naturalization Van Dusen Mimico Creek - erosion control, riparian habitat, barrier mitigation DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff to produce a detailed report about the current regeneration projects underway, summarizing the work that has been undertaken to date and outlining future actions as prescribed in current funding agreements. Additional regeneration sites will be recommended to or by the Coalition as implementation of Greening Our Watersheds proceeds. RES. #H8/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: PRELIMINARY WORKPLAN FOR THE ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION Approval of the preliminary Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Coalition work plan for September, 2002 to March, 2003. Gerry Gorman Chris McGlynn THAT the work plan for the Etobicoke and Mimico Watersheds Coalition for September, 2002 to March, 2003, be approved; AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to prepare a subsequent work plan for approval by the Coalition at meeting #2103 to cover the duration of the Coalition's term ... CARRIED wry 0 g Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H15 BACKGROUND At Meeting #9/01 of the Etobicoke and Mimico Watershed Task Force, it was recommended that the Watersheds Coalition form four interim watershed teams, and that these teams be tasked with the responsibility of developing work plans for each of the watershed priority actions. These individual work plans were then to be integrated into a comprehensive work plan for the Coalition, and the watershed team structure finalized. RATIONALE The rationale for the work plan is detailed in Item 9.2 - Establishment of Interim Watershed Teams. The work plan that is presented is general, and is intended to provide a framework for detailed plans to be developed by each watershed team. The following key points should be noted: 1. Four Interim Watershed Teams are to be established at meeting #1102 of the Watersheds Coalition. 2. The interim Watershed Teams are to meet in October and December to prepare their detailed work plans. These work plans are to be presented to the Coalition at Meeting #1/03. 3. The detailed work plans are to be integrated at meeting #1103 through a facilitated workshop. 4. A recommended integrated work plan and watershed team structure will be presented to the Coalition by staff at meeting #2103. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Work plans are to be established by each watershed team and integrated by the Watershed Coalition at meeting #1/03. • The recommended integrated work plan and Watershed Team structure is to be finalized at meeting #2/03. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for details outlined in the work plan during the Year 2002 have been confirmed and are recommended in the 2003 budget. RES. #H9/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS: 2002 -2003 A schedule of meeting dates is proposed for the Etobicoke- Mimico Watersheds Coalition. Doug McRonney Karen English THAT the meeting dates for the Etobicoke and Mimico Watersheds Coalition scheduled for 6:30 p.m. on the following dates be approved; w rl 111 H16 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept 26, 2002 AND FURTHER THAT the members of the Etobicoke and Mimico Watersheds Coalition be encouraged to host meetings in various locations throughout the watershed CARRIED DATES #1/02 Thursday, September 26, 2002 #2/02 Thursday, November 28, 2002 #1/03 Thursday, January 23, 2003 #2/03 Thursday, March 27, 2003 #3/03 Thursday, May 22, 2003 #4/03 Thursday, July 24, 2003 #5103 Thursday, October 23, 2003 RATIONALE A schedule of meetings is proposed to assist the Coalition. A random sample of municipalities were contacted to avoid choosing meeting dates that may conflict with municipal council meetings. Meetings will be held on the fourth Thursday evening of every month. Watershed Teams will develop their own respective meeting schedules during the months in which the Coalition does not meet with the exception of August and December, unless required by the Coalition or Team work plan. Task Force members are encouraged to host meetings at various locations throughout the watershed. RES. #H10/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: ROAD SALT CONSULATION PROCESS Support of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council, RiverSides Stewardship Alliance and Environment Canada recommendations that road salt be placed on the Environment Canada Priority Substances List Schedule 1 David Switzer Sean Stuart WHEREAS there are water quality and aquatic habitat impairments in both Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek due in part to the amount of road salt which enters the creeks annually through both the stormwater system and road maintenance procedures; Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE- MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H17 AND WHEREAS the strategy document entitled "Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks" speaks specifically to supporting the recommended Environment Canada position that road salts be placed on the Priority Substance List; THEREFORE the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition supports the position of the Don Watershed Regeneration Council, Riversides Stewardship Alliance and Environment Canada, that road salts be placed on the Priority Substance List Schedule 1 .. CARRIED BACKGROUND Chloride concentrations exhibit a very strong seasonal correlation with much higher levels observed during the winter months. This directly correlates to winter salt use on roads, driveways, parking lots and sidewalks. A recent assessment by Environment Canada (2000) indicates that chloride levels above 250 mg /L can have adverse effects on aquatic life. The most recent surface water quality monitoring in the creeks occurred between 1990 and 1995 by the Ministry of the Environment. The results of these surveys are published in a TRCA report entitled "Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek Surface Water Quality Background Technical Report." The chloride concentration results are briefly summarized below. In Mimico Creek, chloride concentrations vary widely at Highway 2 from a minimum of 51 to a maximum of 3470 mg /L. The median concentration at this location was 276 mg /L and 62 per cent of sample concentrations exceeded the 250 mg /L limit. In Etobicoke Creek, mean and median chloride concentrations steadily increase from the upstream to downstream monitoring stations, ranging from 135 to 276 mg /L. Sixty -two percent of samples from the Highway 2 station on Etobicoke Creek exceeded the 250 mg /L limit, beyond which adverse effects to aquatic life may occur. RATIONALE Based on the technical background report, one recommended action in the water quality indicator conventional pollutants and unnatural debris in Greening Our Watersheds is that the use of road salt as a de -icing agent in winter should be decreased or eliminated. The strategy document also acknowledges that ferrocyanides (which are a compound included in road salt production) can photolyse when mixed with water and become cyanide. Cyanide is toxic to both vertebrate and invertebrate aquatic species. For further information please refer to pages 147 to 150 of Greening Our Watersheds. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Staff will prepare a letter of support for the listing of road salts on the Priority Substances List for the signature of the Interim Chair or her designate. wr1IQl H18 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept. 26, 2002 RES. #H11/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: AESTHETICS MONITORING To update the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Coalition on the results of the 2001 visual aesthetics surey and to seek volunteers to participate in further aesthetics monitoring of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watersheds through the Stream Watch and Waterfront Watch Program. Suzanne Barrett Randy McGill THAT the staff report on Aesthetics Monitoring be received for information; THAT community volunteers be sought to participate in the October 1 -31, 2002 visual aesthetics survey; AND FURTHER THAT Coalition members track the visual aesthetic condition of watercourses in the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watersheds by completing at least one visual aesthetics survey on a watercourse or section of the waterfront of their choice during October 1 -31, 2002 CARRIED AMENDMENT RES. #12/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Bette -Ann Goldstein Chris Nelson THAT a database be developed identifying names of people who would be interested in undertaking aesthetics monitoring; AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition on the results of the aesthetics monitoring done in 2002. THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND The degraded water quality aesthetic conditions of Toronto area streams and waterfront contribute to the region's designation as an Area of Concern under the Toronto Remedial Action Plan (RAP). In order to address this issue of concern, the TRCA Regional Watershed Monitoring Program developed a water quality monitoring approach involving an annual community -based survey of water aesthetics. The first pilot survey of aesthetic conditions for Toronto region watercourses and the waterfront was conducted during the month of October 2001. The watershed councils and community volunteers led the assessment, with technical Wtt1g-I, Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H19 support from TRCA staff. The exercise attracted media attention, with features in both print media and cable television. Based on a method developed for the Rouge River Area of Concern in Michigan, and input from the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Task Force and other watershed councils, the survey evaluated aesthetic conditions using four key indicators: water colour, water clarity, water odour, and the presence of visible debris and litter. Each of the indicators was scored separately (out of 10) and the average of the four indicator scores provided the overall site score. Among the 94 sites surveyed, 57 were ranked as good (score between 7.5 and 10), 26 were ranked as fair (score between 5 and 7.4) and 11 were considered to be poor (score of Tess than 5). Average watershed scores were highest in Duffins Creek (8.5), followed by Highland Creek (7.9), Don River (7.4), Mimico Creek (6.6), and finally the Etobicoke Creek and Rouge River watersheds (6.1). However, the sample size in some watersheds was very small ( <10), and there were no surveys returned for Carruthers and Petticoat Creek watersheds, nor for the Waterfront. Modifications to the survey form and expansion of the geographical scope of monitoring activities were recommended for future visual aesthetics monitoring in the Toronto Region. The final report from the 2001 survey will be available on the TRCA website. Improvements have been made to the survey form, and plans are in place to administer a second annual survey in October, 2002. The Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Coalition and other TRCA watershed councils will be asked to assist in promoting and participating in the survey. RATIONALE • Continued monitoring of aesthetics in the Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks will help to better characterize areas previously not monitored, and improve confidence in earlier results. • Aesthetics monitoring data will be used in future Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks watershed report cards, assist with evaluating the status of beneficial use impairments of the Toronto and Region RAP, and provide direction for future /clean -up activities. • Community participation in monitoring is expected to help foster community stewardship. • Aesthetics monitoring helps to fulfil objectives of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. FINANCIAL DETAILS Staff resources for the aesthetics program data analysis are supported by funding available in account #124 -15. wn1e3 H2O ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1102 Sept. 26, 2002 RES. #H13/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: HEALTHY BACKYARDS: PESTICIDE FREE CAMPAIGN To support the Environment Canada EcoAction Community Funding Program proposal for the implementation of a Pesticide Free Campaign in pilot areas across the Greater Toronto Area. Suzanne Barrett Randy McGiII THAT the members of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Coalition endorse the Healthy Backyards: Pesticide Free Campaign; AND FURTHER THAT a letter of support for the Healthy Backyards: Pesticide Free Campaign be sent to Environment Canada's EcoAction Community Funding Program on behalf of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Coalition. AMENDMENT RES. #H14/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Lorna Bissell Diana Karrandjas THAT Loblaws and the Etobicoke Horticultural Society be asked to make a presentation to the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition on pesticide use. THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND As outlined in the strategy document Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks, the indicator 'Backyard Practices' encompasses outdoor practices that are carried out in homes, schools and businesses. The recommendations in this section focus on encouraging people to choose lifestyles that are sustainable and ecologically sound, and include actions such as: collecting baseline data on public awareness, attitudes and practices through surveys and determined targets, developing and implementing a Backyard Practices Stewardship campaign, and supporting TRCA, municipal and community stewardship programs. To achieve this, the Healthy Backyards: Pesticide Free Campaign has been developed. Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE- MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H21 RATIONALE The Healthy Backyard: Pesticide Free Campaign focuses on changing people's lawn care practices to using organic methods instead of the traditional chemical applications for pest control. This will result in a reduction in the amount of pesticides being applied to residential lawns, a reduction in the amount of pesticides entering local creeks through the stormsewer system, and an increase in the number of lawns that are converted from chemical to natural maintenance techniques. This campaign is based on the Caledon Countryside Alliance Weedgee Kidz program where a group of students work in select communities offering to weed people's front lawns for free, and providing information to the residents about the benefits of maintaining a pesticide free lawn and how to achieve this. This program has been extremely successful in Caledon, reaching over 200 houses during the summer of 2002. Within the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds, this campaign will be undertaken in the Heart Lake, Malton and South Mimico Community Action Areas. It will also be implemented in three other areas in the Humber and Don watersheds. Because this campaign is targeted for areas across four TRCA watersheds, the proponent of the project will be the Conservation Foundation. The details of how many students will be hired will be determined once funding from EcoAction is confirmed in January 2003. Funding from the Environment Canada EcoAction Community Funding Program is being sought for a two -year period. Further project details are available in the EcoAction funding package. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding is being requested from the Environment Canada EcoAction Community Funding Program. Matching funding is being secured through Peel Natural Heritage and Toronto RAP. Other partners are currently being approached. Detailed funding information is available in the EcoAction funding package. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • finalize funding partners and collect letters of support for the campaign submission of the EcoAction funding proposal on October 151, 2002 determine the number of students to be hired based on the funding approvals from EcoAction. H22 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept. 26, 2002 RES. #H15/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: STEWARDSHIP AREAS PROJECT To support the Environment Canada EcoAction Community Funding Program proposal for the implementation of a project focussing on the development of stewardship groups in the Heart Lake, Malton, and South Mimico Community Action Areas and the implementation of related regeneration projects. Suzanne Barrett Chris Barnett THAT the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Coalition be the proponent of the Stewardship Areas Project; AND FURTHER THAT a letter of support for the Stewardship Areas Project be sent to Environment Canada's EcoAction Community Funding Program on behalf of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Coalition CARRIED BACKGROUND At meeting #5101, the following Resolution #H54/01 was approved by the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force: THAT the establishment of steering committees be approved, in principle, for each of South Mimico Creek, Malton and Heart Lake Community Action Areas and Bonar Wetland Community Action Site; THAT each group be mandated with the task of guiding the implementation of the particular action area or site plan that has been developed through task force, external peer review and community consultation process, with the ultimate goal of reaching the targets prescribed in the management strategy document; THAT the Chair, or a designated alternate from each steering committee, sit on the future Watersheds Coalition; THAT representatives on each committee include TRCA, municipal and agency staff, local members of the community including residents and businesses, and members representing local community and environmental groups; AND FURTHER THAT a draft terms of reference be prepared for each steering committee and presented to the Task Force at meeting #6/01. Three Community Action Areas have been initiated to date: Heart Lake, Malton, and South Mimico (Bloor Street to Lake Ontario). All three Community Action Areas have been the focus of public consultation initiatives since June, 2000, including information sessions, environmental fairs, and regeneration events. From these public events, the stewardship group membership has developed. Currently, there are 125 people on the Heart Lake stewardship Pri 1 f o Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H23 mailing list, 64 people on the Malton stewardship mailing list, and 41 people on the South Mimico stewardship mailing list. The Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force approved a terms of reference for the stewardship groups at Heart Lake, Malton, and South Mimico. The Terms of Reference outlines the mandate, which is to make recommendations regarding priorities, implementation, and /or modifications to the Community Action Areas plan. RATIONALE Community action area plans are intended to be the vehicle for implementing the watershed management strategy at the community level, and community action site plans are intended to be the vehicle for implementing the watershed management strategy at the site level through the community. The development and implementation of these plans is intended to foster community awareness and support, and to serve as an avenue for funding. Successful implementation of the watershed strategies through these plans is dependant upon a number of factors coming together. These factors include municipal and agency support, community support and involvement, technical support, and funding. Involving the community through stewardship groups in the development and implementation of these plans will help to ensure their successful implementation. Although public support in the community action areas has been strong, the stewardship groups have not yet been formally organized. The Etobicoke and Mimico Stewardship Areas Project will focus on: • initiating stewardship groups in the Heart Lake, Malton, and South Mimico Community Action Areas based on the approved Terms of References; • expanding the stewardship group membership; • involving the members in community -based biological monitoring programs; • involving the members in local regeneration projects as guided by the community action area plans; and helping the stewardship groups to fulfill their mandate which is to make recommendations regarding priorities, implementation, and /or modifications to the Community Action Areas plan. Funding from the Environment Canada EcoAction Community Funding Program is being sought for a two year period. Further project details are available in the EcoAction funding package. H24 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept. 26, 2002 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding is being requested from the Environment Canada EcoAction Community Funding Program. Matching funding is being secured through Peel Natural Heritage and Toronto RAP. Other partners to this project are currently being approached. Funding will also be provided in the 2003 TRCA Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds budget. Detailed funding information is available in the EcoAction funding package. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE finalize funding partners and collect letters of support for the program submission of the EcoAction funding proposal to Environment Canada on October 15` 2002 RES. #H16/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: WATERSHED INITIATIVES Receipt of information on initiatives that affect the watersheds including The Earth Charter, the Canada - Ontario Agreement, Walkerton, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, Smart Growth, Toronto Area of Concern Remedial Action Plan, official plans Toronto and Peel, Vision Brampton and City of Toronto Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan. Marilyn Hagerman Bob Noble THAT the staff report on watershed initiatives including The Earth Charter, the Canada - Ontario Agreement, Walkerton, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, Smart Growth, the Toronto Area of Concern Remedial Action Plan, official plans Toronto and Peel, Vision Brampton and City of Toronto Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan, be received for information CARRIED BACKGROUND Since the final Etobicoke and Mimico Watersheds Task Force meeting in November, 2001, there have been a number of initiatives that have taken place which could affect the watersheds, and of which the Coalition members should be aware. The Earth Charter The Earth Charter was one of the expected outcomes of the 1992 Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro. It was to have formed the ethical foundation upon which Agenda 21 and the other Rio documents were to have been based. The call for such a document caught the imagination of individuals and organizations around the world, as well as some governments During the two years leading up to and including the Earth Summit, NGOs and government delegations from around the world worked on elements of the Charter. Still, governments could not reach agreement on an Earth Charter and instead adopted the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development which, valuable as it was, did not meet the expectations of a Charter. Sept 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE- MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H25 Following the Earth Summit, two international NGOs, the Earth Council and Green Cross International, with the support of the Dutch Government, joined forces with others to pursue the development of an Earth Charter. Over the past decade, the International Earth Charter Initiative conducted a world wide, cross cultural dialogue on common goals and shared values. Hundreds of organizations and thousands of individuals participated. Guided by this global conversation, the Initiative drafted the Earth Charter as a people's declaration that gives expression to an emerging global consensus on fundamental values and principles for a just and sustainable world. The Earth Charter seeks to promote awareness of the major challenges and choices facing humanity. It recognizes that in the midst of great diversity we live in an increasingly interdependent world and that a global partnership involving civil society, business, and government is essential. It is an urgent call for changes in lifestyle, institutional practice, and public policy required to protect the larger living world and to ensure a better future for all. On May 24, 2002 The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority endorsed The Earth Charter as a statement of their commitment to the spirit and aims of the document. In so doing, they pledge to join the global partnership for a just, sustainable, and peaceful world and to work towards the realization of its values and principles. They pledged to promote and apply its principles in our programs, policies and other activities. In terms of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds, Agenda 21 and The Earth Charter, while international in focus, reflect independent principles that can be applied at the local level. Chapter 28 of Agenda 21 highlights a role for local action in implementing sustainable development. The sustainable practices indicator in Greening Our Watersheds (pages 193 to 202) builds upon the conceptual foundations of The Earth Charter and Agenda 21 by offering a way to implement global ideas within the two watersheds. For additional information on Agenda 21 and The Earth Charter, see www.un.orq /esa /sustde /agenda2ltext.htm and www.earthcharter.orq. Canada - Ontario Agreement On June 12, 2002 the governments of Canada and Ontario renewed their commmitment to cleaning up and restoring the Great Lakes by announcing the signing of the Canada - Ontario Agreement Respecting the Great lakes Basin Ecosystem. The new COA recognixes the need for local, community involvement if ecosystem benefitis are to be achieved throughout the Great Lakes system. Walkerton The Walkerton Inquiry's Part 2 report, A Strategy for Safe Drinking Water, was released by the Ontario Government in May, 2002 and contains 93 recommendations for improved public policy and programs that will ensure the safety of Ontario's drinking water supply. The report focuses considerable attention on the importance of protecting drinking water supply management. Specifically, the report calls for the preparation of watershed -based source protection plans and outlines the role of conservation authorities in this effect. wrt I f, H26 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept. 26, 2002 Both TRCA and Credit Valley Conservation are working with Conservation Ontario to develop a recommended framework for Source Protection Plans that can be integrated with the on- going processes of watershed planning and management. Within Peel Region, significant work has already been accomplished due to the proactive efforts of the region and its conservation authorities. Much of the basic information needed to develop protection plans are already in place. The agencies and their partners continue to update these programs as new information becomes available. Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, Highlights of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan After a six -month moratorium that froze development on the Oak Ridges Moraine, and during which time a strategy was developed and public consultation undertaken, legislation (Bill 122, The Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act) was passed in the Ontario Legislature and received Royal Assent on December 14, 2001. On April 22, 2002 the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP) was approved and filed as a Minister's regulation (0. Reg. 140/02). The purpose of the Plan is to provide land use and resource management planning direction to ensure the protection of the ecological and hydrological integrity of the Oak Ridges Moraine (ORM). The ORMCP provides for four land use designations with approximately 62% of the lands within the ORM identified as Natural Core Area (NCA - 38 %) or Natural Linkage Area (NLA - 24%), with very limited new land uses being permitted. A further 30% of ORM lands are designated through the Plan as Countryside Areas, which are largely identified for agricultural, rural, recreational and resource uses. The remaining 8% of the ORM lands are designated as Settlement Areas and are restricted to existing urban or settlement area boundaries. While no lands within the Etobicoke Creek watershed are located within the ORMCP planning area, there may be some groundwater connections that provide base flow to the headwaters of the river. Some of the requirements of the ORM Act or Conservation Plan include: • prohibiting the area of the NCA and NLA from being reduced; • requiring Official Plans and zoning by -laws to be amended within either one year or eighteen months and that those amendments "shall conform" to the ORMCP; • prohibiting new aggregate extraction in NCA, but allowing for this restriction to be revisited during the ten year review of the ORMCP; • prohibiting the expansion of Settlement Area boundaries (and then only into Countryside Areas) until the 10 year review of the ORMCP; • requiring detailed water management studies (watershed plans, water budgets and conservation plans) and their results to be incorporated into municipal Official Plans; wr,I14 Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 • requiring site - specific environmental impact studies within the "minimum area of influence" (generally 120m) of terrestrial and hydrological features; H27 • maintaining a 30m "minimum vegetation protection zone" i.e. a buffer, around most features; and • a provision for the development of a continuous trail to be established along the entire length of the ORM. Conservation Authorities Moraine Coalition (CAMC) The ORMCP was designed and written to be implemented by municipal governments. Many of the requirements of the Plan, however, involve tasks or studies that conservation authorities have traditionally undertaken for their member municipalities. Prior to the enactment of the ORM Act and Plan conservation authorities with watersheds on the ORM formed a coalition to advocate for the protection of the moraine and its unique environmental features. The CAMC was formed in early 2000 by the nine Conservation Authorities with watersheds on the Oak Ridges Moraine. The mission of the CAMC is to advance the science and understanding of the ORM and to work towards government, agency and community support for the conservation and protection of the form, function and linkages of the moraine. The work of the CAMC to date has been focussed in three main areas: policy, groundwater and natural heritage. Since its inception, the Coalition was fully involved in and supportive of the Tri- Region (York, Peel, Durham) policy initiative to protect the ORM. Subsequently, the CAMC was also an active participant in the provincial policy initiative which resulted in the ORM Act and Conservation Plan. Currently the CAMC is participating in two additional related initiatives: 1) the technical review of guidelines that are being prepared by the province to implement the moraine Conservation Plan; and 2) developing their own CAMC proposal to assist municipalities in Plan implementation. The Coalition's hydro geologist has taken the lead role to coordinate the groundwater management strategy being undertaken on behalf of the Regional Municipalities of York, Peel and Durham (YPD). This study, in conjunction with similar studies being undertaken by conservation authorities and municipalities in the eastern and northern portions of the ORM, will provide a regional -scale characterization of the overall groundwater flow system in south - central Ontario. This will set the context for the local scale studies required by the ORM Conservation Plan such as wellhead protection, watershed studies and water budgets and conservation plans. While these specific studies will not apply within the Etobicoke Creek watershed, some work has been undertaken to characterize the watershed through the broad - scale Phase 1 YPD groundwater studies. Many of the conservation authorities along the moraine have begun developing natural heritage programs for their watersheds using the ecological land classification (ELC) system. The CAMC will be assisting in the co- ordination of these efforts to ensure a consistent approach to natural heritage protection along the entire moraine and to integrate a larger landscape scale vision of the Oak Ridges Moraine with natural heritage lands off the ORM. wool H28 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept. 26, 2002 The TRCA has been conducting some work in this regard within the Etobicoke Creek watershed to ensure that vital connections and linkages from the moraine to the waterfront are maintained or enhanced. The nine members of the CAMC are, from west to east, Credit Valley, Nottawasaga Valley, Toronto & Region, Lake Simcoe Region, Central Lake Ontario, Kawartha, Ganaraska Region, Otonabee and Lower Trent conservation authorities. Smart Growth The Ontario government has recently published Smart Growth, A New Vision. It is the government's vision for promoting growth in ways that will create a strong economy, build strong communities and promote a healthy environment. The Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force was identified as a stakeholder in the Smart Growth process. In the near future, the province will be continuing to update stakeholders in the progress of the Smart Growth initiative. Staff at the TRCA have also been involved in the Smart Growth initiative. In August, staff were invited by the Smart Growth Secretariate to attend a strategy sub -panel of the Smart Growth Committee for Central Region. At this meeting, staff represented Conservation Ontario and presented a framing of the environmental issues surrounding growth in Central Ontario. Toronto Area of Concern Remedial Action Plan The Toronto Area of Concern includes the Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek, Humber River, Don River, Highland Creek and Rouce River watersheds. In 1994, the Toronto Area of Concern Remedial Action Plan Clean Water, Clear Choices was published. Recommendations of the plan have been incorporated in the management strategies of Greening Our Watersheds (chapters 6, 7 and 8),In November 2001, a progress report Clean Waters, Healthy Habitats was released. The report concludes that "progress has been made, but it is not sufficient to declare that remediation is complete, nor to provide the clean, green, healthy connections that Toronto and the upstream municipalities need to provide a high quality of life for residents, tourists and business investments." In the spring of 2002, the Toronto Waterfront Regeneration Trust announced that it would not be renewing its partnership with the TRCA, Environment Canada and the Ministry of the Environment for the implementation of the RAP actions. TRCA has recently reached an understanding with provincal and federal government and will be the sole partner in the implementation of the RAP actions over the next five years. Official Plans for Toronto and Peel Every five years, municipalities must review their official plans. The City of Toronto has been undergoing a comprehensive review process since amalgamation and is in the process of finalizing its draft plan for council, and then Ministry of Municipal Affairs and housing, approval. The new draft Toronto Official Plan looks ahead 30 years through a sustainability Tens and provides a framework for managing physical change that is need for a successful City. TRCA staff comments on the draft Official Plan are being prepared. Watersheds Coalition members are encouraged to participate in upcoming Public Consultation meetings (once announced, dates will be distributed to Coalition members via e- mail). Sept. 26, 2002 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 H29 The Region of Peel has confirmed that while their official plan in its entirety is not in need of review, certain sections are to be updated. One of these sections is the natural system. As recommended in Greening Our Watersheds, the natural system should be delineated according to boundaries required for healthy terrestrial, aquatic and water management and these boundaries should be set as defined limits at the outset of the planning process. TRCA staff is currently working with Peel staff to define the boundaries of the system and to develop appropriate policies for its protection. Vision Brampton Every three years, the Strategic Plan for Brampton is renewed. As part of the public consultation process, the City holds a public forum to gather input from community leaders. The information received from this forum is used to help create the Strategic Plan. TRCA staff has been invited to attend the Community Leader's Vision Workshop, rescheduled to September 24th. Beth Williston, Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Specialist will attend. City of Toronto Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan The City of Toronto has been working with consultants, the TRCA and an advisory group do develop recommendations for managing wet weather flows in the City. The final draft report has recently been released to the advisory group and TRCA staff for comment. TRCA comments on the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek sections of the report will be forwarded to Coalition members once complete, for your information. A public meeting is also planned. Coalition members are encouraged to attend and will be notified through e-mail once the meeting dates are set. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Staff will continue to keep Coalition members informed of updates with respect to these and other initiatives that may affect the watersheds. NEW BUSINESS ETOBICOKE - MIMICO BUS TOUR Members were reminded about and encouraged to attend the Etobicoke - Mimico Creeks Tour scheduled for Saturday, October 5`h, 2002 from 1:00 -5:00 p.m. H30 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #1/02 Sept. 26, 2002 TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:05 p.m., September 26, 2002. Brian Denney J. Craig Mather Director, Watershed Management Secretary- Treasurer /L. col iq LI t‘. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MINUTES OF THE ETOBICOKE AND MIMICO CREEK WATERSHEDS COALITION #2102 November 28, 2002 Page H31 The Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Coalition met at the Peel Village Golf Club, on November 28, 2002. In the absence of the Chair, Gary Wilkins chaired the meeting which was called to order at 6:55 p.m. PRESENT Chris Barnett Member Cleve Battick Member Marjut Dunker Member Janice Etter Member Bette -Ann Goldstein Member Gerry Gorman Member Michael Gusche Alternate Cliff Gyles Member Marilyn Hagerman Member Robert Jamieson Member Diana Karrandjas Member Alina Korniluk Alternate David Lyons Member Susan McClure Member Randy McGill Member Chris McGlynn Member John McMahon Alternate Vojka Miladinovic Alternate Steve Rutherford Member Sean Stuart Member David Switzer Member Tanya Trivedi Alternate Debbie Wagdin Member GUESTS Rose Burrows EA, Councillor Gyles STAFF Jon Clayton Supervisor, Aquatic Ecosystem Mgt. Kristin Geater Etobicoke - Mimico Watershed Project Manager W f1,°15' H32 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 John Stifle Environmental Technician, Coastal Ecology Ken Towle Terrestrial Biologist Gary Wilkins Specialist Paul Willms Etobicoke - Mimico Watershed Resource Planner RES. #H17/02 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Diana Karrandjas Chris McGlynn THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/02, held on September 26, 2002, be received CARRIED PRESENTATIONS (a) Habitat Implementation Plans for Etobicoke - Mimico Creek Watersheds J. Stifle made a brief presentation on habitat implementation plans for the watersheds. (b) Etobicoke - Mimico Fisheries Management Plan J. Clayton presented the work done to date on the Fisheries Management Plan. (c) Etobicoke - Mimico Terrestrial Natural Heritage Study K. Towle updated the members on the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Study. The presenters were thanked for their informative presentations. RES. #H18/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: HABITAT IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Development of habitat implementation plans for the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds. Chris Barnett Randy McGill THAT the staff report on the current Habitat Implementation Plans be received; wr1i' (o November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H33 AND FURTHER THAT a detailed report on the current regeneration projects be provided to the Coalition at a future date CARRIED BACKGROUND A habitat implementation plan will be developed for the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds which will essentially be a "cookbook" of habitat implementation projects. The goal is to develop a compilation of approximately 15 projects with concept designs and a preliminary budget. These projects could include barrier removal, aquatic habitat restoration or riparian plantings. This compilation will then be used as a schedule of implementation projects for the next five years where one or more of these projects could be implemented yearly. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE This exercise will be conducted in six phases as follows: Phase One: Site Selection and Inventory Review available references which include: - sub watershed mapping of priority riparian restoration sites - Etobicoke/ Mimico fish plans - GTAA projects - terrestrial natural heritage study - end -of pipe stormwater retrofit opportunities - riparian areas with hydraulic concerns - altered creeks study • Review topographical maps and aerial photos • Select and map potential project locations • Apply Terrestrial Natural Heritage Strategy Methods for prioritization of potential sites. • Conduct site visits with other TRCA staff and municipal partners to review potential sites. • Consult with the Etobicoke - Mimico Coalition for their recommendations • Inventory suitable sites and develop preliminary recommendations. Phase Two: Project Prioritization • Prepare a brief background report, with support mapping, that summarizes the results of the inventories. • Send the initial report to internal staff for peer review. • Send the initial report to municipal partners to ensure selected sites do not conflict with municipal projects. • Edit report as per peer review and municipal staff comments. • Have the Etobicoke - Mimico Coalition and watershed planning staff review background report and results of the priority setting to affirm direction of projects will 17 H34 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 Prepare detailed site prescription for habitat regeneration /creation of priority location with other TRCA staff, detailing land ownership, opportunities for funding and requirements for legislative approvals. Phase Three: Report Development Compile project information on all sites, with supporting maps and images, in report format. • Send out for final peer review • Finalize report and present to Etobicoke - Mimico Coalition and Watershed Planning staff • Send report to funding /municipal partners Phase Four: Project Planning (Watershed Planners) • Projects will be classified by Watershed Planners as either a site regeneration project (if it has only one or two habitat issues, i.e., mitigate a fish barrier) or a community action site (if it has issues including a variety of habitat components, stormwater, recreation, heritage etc.) • Detailed regeneration /community action site plans will be developed with technical assistance provided by TRCA Senior Staff support and, if possible, utilizing internal TRCA Landscape Architect (recognizing that for some regeneration work, the project moves very quickly to phase four, i.e., fish barriers); this also recognizes that background studies (e.g., soil tests etc) may be commissioned through the Environmental Services section. Input from the Coalition will be sought; Public meetings and /or public consultation will be conducted Public comments will be considerated and incorporated, where applicable Approvals will be sought; Funding will be secured Signage and other education /promotional literature will be developed Phase Five: Project Implementation (Environmental Services) • Location • Site preparation • Grading and installation of infrastructure • Planting Phase Six: Community Involvement (Watershed Planners /Stewardship) • Community events will be planned by the Watershed Planners in collaboration with Stewardship staff and the Watersheds Coalition. • Events will be delivered by Watershed and Environmental Services Staff. November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H35 RES. #H19/02 - FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PLANS To update the Etobicoke - Mimico Watersheds Coalition on the general content and the overall status of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks Fisheries Management Plans. Moved by: Sean Stuart Seconded by: Gerry Gorman THAT the staff report on Fisheries Management Plans be received for information CARRIED BACKGROUND The need for a Fisheries Management Plan (FMPs) was recognized early on in the development of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks Watershed Strategies. The FMPs begin by developing an overview of the baseline biological, physical, and chemical data for the watersheds. These data are then used as a basis for determining the 'potential' of the watershed from a fisheries perspective, and are compared to more recent sampling data to determine if this 'potential' is being met and /or what measures are necessary to achieve it. The FMPs are then used as resource documents to guide regeneration projects and as tools in the Plan Input and Review process. Recent sampling for both fisheries and invertebrate data was completed under TRCA's Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. The Program is focussed primarily on tracking change at a watershed and subwatershed scale through the collection and monitoring of data on five major components: Aquatic Habitat and Species; Fluvial Geomorphology; Terrestrial Natural Heritage; Surface Water Quality; and, Flow and Precipitation. Under the monitoring program, 150 sites are sampled annually across TRCA's jurisdiction for invertebrate species, and 50 sites are sampled annually for fisheries species, following MNR's Stream Habitat Assessment Protocol for Southern Ontario (i.e., all sites measured annually for invertebrates, and every three years for fisheries). In the case of both Mimico and Etobicoke Creeks, sampling for benthic invertebrates was carried out in 2001 and 2002. Fisheries sampling was completed for Etobicoke Creek in 2001, and for Mimico Creek in 2002. Fourteen stations were sampled in Etobicoke Creek and five stations in Mimico Creek. Based on the biological information and through consideration of existing physical and chemical conditions, individual reaches are categorized into one of seven aquatic habitat categories. These categories are a way of describing the "potential" of a stream reach to support a type of aquatic community. Once the types of aquatic habitats are defined within the entire watershed, an analysis is undertaken to identify the most sensitive species that currently or historically existed within the habitat. Once the 'target' species has been identified, consideration is given to what measures are necessary to either protect and /or restore the conditions necessary to support the 'target' species. Commonly used rehabilitation activities include: planting riparian vegetation; improving water quality; stabilizing flows; mitigating instream barriers; in -water rehabilitation works; natural channel design; and, stocking. H36 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 PROGRESS TO -DATE AND NEXT STEPS Prior to the formation of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Task Force, assessments of the aquatic habitat and species within both watersheds were developed. These two draft reports entitled Evaluating the Condition of the Fish Communities in the Etobicoke Creek Watershed and Evaluating the Condition of the Fish Communities in the Mimico Creek Watershed (TRCA, 1998) helped guide the Task Force as the watershed strategy was developed and formed the basis for the development of the FMPs. The Task Force was also given the opportunity to comment on the two reports. These two reports did not have any management recommendations and as such, were not complete Fisheries Management Plans. At the beginning of this year, the process to take the biological, and physical assessments of the earlier reports, synthesize that information and add the management recommendations began. A public meeting was held on October 3rd, 2002 at Professor's Lake Recreation Centre to provide an overview of the intent of the FMPs and to gain input from the public on their concerns, issues, and desires. Information gathered from this meeting will be incorporated into the management strategies and a second public meeting is planned for early December 2002, at which time the final draft of the Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks FMPs will be presented. The final document is anticipated to be complete by the end of 2002 and then circulated to both the TRCA and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources for approval in early 2003. The final FMPs are scheduled for release to the public in the spring of 2003. FINANCIAL DETAILS Staff resources for the Fisheries Management Plans are supported by funding available in account #118 -82. RES. #H20/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM To update the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Coalition on the status of the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program. David Switzer Chris Barnett THAT the staff report on the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program be received for information CARRIED BACKGROUND The status of.terrestrial biodiversity is an important component of watershed health, and the TRCA has responded by developing the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program (TNHP). Early in the course of this program a report titled Terrestrial Habitat Analysis of the Etobicoke and wM 200 November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H37 Mimico Creek Watersheds was produced to summarize the status of habitats in the watersheds and the issues surrounding them. Results from this report were incorporated into the State of the Watershed Report (December 1998). The TNHP recognizes three main levels of Terrestrial Natural Heritage: Landscape, Vegetation Communities, and Species. A scoring and ranking system has been developed for species and communities based not only on abundance, but on sensitivities to development, demonstrating a more proactive approach than merely concentrating on rarity from a provincial or national perspective. The result has been a list of species and communities of local concern to the TRCA jurisdiction. A landscape analysis of habitat patch characteristics, including size, shape, and surrounding matrix influence was also developed as a remote assessment tool using ArcView geographic information systems (GIS) software. This tool also provides the ability to track changes in total cover and distribution of major habitat types such as forest, wetland, and meadow. A series of indicators reflecting the three levels of detail recognized by the TNHP program has been developed and this was incorporated into the Greening Our Watersheds report. These indicators provide the structure for the Report Card results to measure changes in terrestrial natural heritage. PROGRESS TO DATE AND NEXT STEPS The intent of the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program is to define a target improved natural heritage system and a Terrestrial Natural Heritage Strategy for the TRCA region. The indicators will be used to measure progress towards achieving this system. They have already been used in a draft State of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Report for the TRCA jurisdiction, which will serve as a baseline by which to measure change. Each of the nine individual watersheds within the jurisdiction, including the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watersheds, are considered subsets of the region. A watershed -based Terrestrial Natural Heritage Strategy can conceivably be developed as a more detailed local application of the regional strategy or the targets for the indicators in the regional strategy can simply be interpreted and addressed at the individual watershed level through the report card mechanism. The landscape, vegetation communities, and species ranking process summarizes the existing conditions of the Terrestrial Natural Heritage System. Currently the work of the TNHP is focussed on developing a methodology for defining an expanded and healthier regional system. The new raster -based GIS analysis and mapping involves dividing the region into 10 metre x 10 metre squares or "rasters." A series of ecological criteria have been chosen (e.g. distance of forest to forest, forest to wetland, distance to roads, presence of species or communities of concern, etc.), and a scale of values created for each of these. Each individual raster then receives a corresponding numerical value for the ecological features found there. This results in a map of values depicted as different colour hues across the landscape. Which rasters are to be included in the target system will be decided by a desired percent cover for the region or parts thereof. Some will include existing habitat, and others will depict areas of potential habitat that will improve the health of the system. The target system will then be translated into the different indicators. wrl 2O I H38 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 This target setting methodology is currently undergoing scientific peer review. Revised maps will then be used as the basis for internal review and TRCA policy discussion, as well as for external municipal partner and stakeholder review. The goal is to have a final system and strategy in place by the end of 2003. It should be noted that terrestrial is only one component of a natural heritage system, and that aquatic and hydrological features and functions have yet to be integrated. RES. #H21/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: REGIONAL WATERSHEDS MONITORING NETWORK To provide an overview of the Regional Watersheds Monitoring Network program. Sean Stuart Susan McClure THAT the staff report on the Regional Watersheds Monitoring Network, be received CARRIED BACKGROUND In recent years there has been an increased demand for monitoring data that can be used to measure performance and evaluate environmental health. In implementing watershed strategies through the watershed alliances and councils, TRCA has developed report cards for individual watersheds. These report cards have created a formal process for reporting on the health of individual watersheds and have increased the demand for monitoring data. Municipalities also require environmental data to report on the state of the environment. The Regional Watershed Monitoring Program is an ongoing program that has been developed by the TRCA to provide a comprehensive, integrated and coordinated approach to environmental monitoring in the Greater Toronto Area. The program includes the establishment of a Monitoring Network that brings together a group of Tike- minded, cooperative agencies and organizations to collect, store, distribute and report on environmental monitoring data that furthers the interests of all involved parties. This Monitoring Network builds on the existing local and project- specific monitoring efforts of its partners. Partners in this Network and the program include the Region of Peel, Region of York, Region of Durham, the City of Toronto, the Ministry of the Environment and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Topic areas include: Aquatic Habitat and Species /Fluvial Geomorphology Terrestrial Natural Heritage Surface Water Quality Flow and Precipitation Groundwater Air Quality November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H39 Monitoring objectives for the first four topic areas are complete, work plans for implementation have been established, and implementation has commenced starting in 2001. Groundwater monitoring objectives will be established through the Groundwater Management Program, although a preliminary network of 14 monitoring sites has been established by TRCA in partnership with MOE. Air quality issues have not yet been addressed. PROJECT OBJECTIVES To develop a program that provides the necessary information to assess the health of the watersheds, subwatersheds, waterfront ecosystems, and RAP area, spatially and temporally. To identify a set of indicators that reflect ecosystem condition, integrate the monitoringrequirements of the RAP with report cards for individual watersheds, and are compatible with municipal state of the environment reporting and other broad programs like SOLEC, for the Great Lakes basin, and the provincial policy performance indicators. To develop an efficient program that builds upon existing monitoring activities, avoids duplication between agencies, municipalities, and organizations, is cost effective in allocating the best use of resources and informs management decisions. To identify ways to engage and involve the public, interest, and school groups in meaningful monitoring activities. To develop and obtain agreement from stakeholders on a set of monitoring protocols for the collection, analysis, storage and distribution of data on the indicators that are identified. In 2001, the Authority initiated the year 1 implementation of the monitoring program. The ongoing Monitoring Activities supporting the Regional Program are implemented through the Authority and a network of partners, as described in the following table: MONITORING COMPONENT AGENCY / PARTNER 2001 2002 2003 SITES SITES SITES Aquatic Habitat & Species Benthos Fish Community & Habitat Fluvial Geomorphology Algae Surface Water Quality Routine Stream Sampling Flow & Precipitation Stream Flow Gauges Precipitation Gauges Snow Course Monitoring Groundwater Terrestrial Natural Heritage TRCA / MOE TRCA / MNR 114 141 144 TRCA TRCA / City of 51 50 40 50 50 Toronto 114 50 144 141 City of Toronto /TRCA 22 33 40+ TRCA TRCA / Environment 2 1 3 6 5 3 6 5 3 Canada TRCA /MNR 14 20 TRCA /MOE TRCA 2,600 4500 8000 ha ha + ha + 61 61 sites sites ',Jr] 103 H40 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 The following summarizes the monitoring activities carried out for each of the included program components during 2001 and 2002: Aquatic Habitat and Species Aquatic organisms live, for the most part, their entire lives within the water. As a result, they are subjected to the many interacting physical, chemical and biological factors-that surround them, and are dependent upon these factors for the maintenance of their health. Such factors include water temperature, water flow, nutrients, sediment or contaminants carried in water, channel form and types of in- stream cover, to report a few. If an environment becomes degraded, often, the first clue is a change in the biotic community. Benthic Invertebrates are monitored at a total of 114 sites, within the Humber, Etobicoke Creek, and Mimico Creek in 2001. Samples were obtained at each site using a modified kick and sweep netting technique. Samples were submitted to a qualified consultant for identification services and are identified to species. These same sites were sampled again in 2002, along with the addition of 27 sites within the Duffins, Carruthers and Petticoat Creek watersheds. Based on the data collected in 2001, 2002 and future years, a variety of multi- metric and multi- variate approaches will be used to assess water quality and habitat conditions within the sample sites. Future use of the data will also include the identification of Regional Reference Sites that may be used to characterize the ecological integrity of various streams within the Region. Fish Species and Habitat Fishes and their community structure are often used as indicators of the health of an aquatic system for a number of reasons: 1) fish communities usually encompass all of the trophic levels present in a system from primary consumers (herbivores) to top predators (piscivores); 2) fish are generally easy to sample and identify; 3) there is a wealth of information available on their life- histories and various sensitivities to environmental degradation; 4) historical data exists regarding fish communities in many areas; 5) fishing is an important industry with economic value; 6) the general public and policy makers can relate more to fish than other aquatic organisms. In order to gain a regional understanding of fish species and habitat on a watershed basis, the monitoring program has targeted 150 sites throughout the nine watersheds within the TRCA jurisdiction. In 2001 and 2002 a total of 91 of these sites (Humber, Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek, Don and Highland Creek) were monitored using the Ontario Stream Assessment Protocol. Sites within the Rouge, Duffins and Carruthers Creek watersheds will be surveyed in 2003. The TRCA's Regional Monitoring Program recommends that fish communities and habitat within the watersheds be monitored on a three -year cycle, and as such, the second cycle of fish and habitat monitoring will be undertaken in the Humber and Etobicoke Creek watersheds in 2004. At that time the 51 sites monitored in 2001 will be revisited and monitored using the Stream Assessment Protocol. Pi u'l November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H41 Fluvial Geomorphology The physical component of aquatic habitat in a stream is closely related to the fluvial geomorphology. Studies of fluvial geomorphology are important components of works in and around watercourses and are often undertaken in association with these works. Previously, there have been few on -going monitoring activities associated with tracking changes in fluvial geomorphology, spatially and temporally. The importance of fluvial geomorphology in understanding the association between flow in a stream and the aquatic habitat present cannot be over stated. For this reason, several aspects of fluvial geomorphological assessments (e.g.,. long profiles, cross sections, pebble counts, bank full width and depth etc...) have been incorporated into the Regional Monitoring Program, and are currently being implemented by the TRCA. A total of 150 stations across the nine watersheds within the TRCA's jurisdiction have been targeted as part of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. In 2001and 2002 a total of 100 of these stations were established (Humber, Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek, Don Highland and Rouge) and surveyed using standard fluvial geomorphology measurement techniques. Fifty additional sites will be established and surveyed in the Petticoat Creek, Duffins and Carruthers watersheds in 2003. The Monitoring Program recommends that changes in fluvial geomorphology within the watersheds be monitored on a three year cycle, and as such the second cycle of fluvial geomorphology monitoring will be undertaken in the Humber, Etobicoke Creek, and Mimico Creek watersheds in 2004. At that time the 50 sites that were set -up and monitored in 2001 will be revisited, and measured for change. Algae Algae have been successfully used to monitor such things as nutrient surplus (i.e.,. eutrophication), turbidity and siltation, organic enrichment, high salinity, contamination by metals, and acidification. At present there are several programs throughout the world that have utilized algae monitoring. The benefit of using algae as a biomonitor is its low cost relative to other traditional methods as well as the non - destructive collection methods of algae sampling. In addition, algae are often the first group of organisms to be impacted by shifts in physical and chemical conditions in a watercourse, including the introduction of pollutants at relatively low concentrations, because of their strong connection to basic water chemistry and their short life cycles. Thus algae can be an important component of an early warning system of change in a watershed. Algae sampling has been conducted during the 2001 and 2002 field seasons more than 114 sites within the GTA watersheds. In 2002, a formal partnership was established between the TRCA and the University of Toronto in order to analyze the samples collected and to further evaluate the use of algae as a biomonitor for the GTA watersheds. The initial stage of this work was to focus on the Humber river, in order to collect additional samples for analysis and to calibrate the algae communities found to the water quality conditions that are present. Sampling at approximately 40 sites in Peel Region in addition to the previously sampled locations will be undertaken in 2003 to support this initiative. H42 ETOBICOKE- MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 Terrestrial Natural Heritage Under the Regional Monitoring Program, terrestrial natural heritage monitoring was undertaken in support of the development of TRCA's Natural Heritage Strategy. Approximately 2600 hectares of natural cover (forest, wetlands and meadow) were inventoried by staff biologists throughout the Peel Region in 2001, with another 1900 hectares being inventoried in 2002. The surveys involved mapping and describing vegetation communities, and mapping flora and fauna species. To date, approximately 45% of the natural cover in the TRCA jurisdiction has been digitized. This 2002 and earlier information has been combined into a regional inventory and will be used in the development of the Natural Heritage Strategy and in subsequent stages of its implementation. Field work will continue in 2003 in order to further map and digitize natural cover in the GTA. This will include approximately 8000 hectares within the GTA. In addition, 61 fixed sites that were established within the Regions in 2002 will be monitored in conjunction with community volunteers. Water Quality In 2002, the Authority continued to liaise and expand partnerships with our key program delivery agencies, including the City of Toronto (stream and waterfront routine water chemistry monitoring); Ministry of the Environment (Tributary Toxics Monitoring; Young -of- the -Year Biomonitoring; Sport Fish Contaminant Monitoring; Lake Partner Program). In addition, a new, community based program initiated in 2001 expanded opportunities for volunteers to participate in stream aesthetic monitoring activities. In 2001, routine stream chemistry was tracked at 22 sites across in the GTA watersheds. An additional 11 sites, were added in 2002 as part of a new TRCA /MOE partnership under the Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network, and metals analysis at the previously monitored routine stream chemistry sites was also added. Stream chemistry monitoring will be further enhanced in 2003 with more than 40 sites throughout the nine regional watersheds being surveyed monthly for stream chemistry. MOE continued with their ongoing Sport Fish Contaminant program in 2002. A number of regional sites have been identified under this program. Discussions are ongoing with MOE, including offering Authority field staff to assist with collections if necessary, to ensure that the sites are visited regularly under this program. TRCA helped bring together community volunteers in the past year to participate in MOE's Lake Partner Program to track lake nutrient conditions. For the first time volunteers participated in the program at Seneca /Eaton Hall Lake, Palgrave Pond, Claireville Reservoir, Grenadier Pond and Heart Lake. TRCA field center staff monitored Lake St. George. Other recommended lakes for the program for which volunteers will be sought in early 2003 with the help of the Authority's community watershed councils and task forces include Mary Lake, Gibson Lake and Professor's Lake. Groundwaterin 2001 and 2002, the TRCA entered into partnership with the MOE under the Provincial Groundwater Quality Monitoring Network. Under this partnership, TRCA will be . maintaining and monitoring approximately 20 groundwater well s within the GTA Regions. In addition to regular maintenance and inspection, monitoring of groundwater at these sites will wM ?.off November 28/02 ETOBICOKE- MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H43 include monthly manual water level measurements, and the bi- annual collection of water samples for laboratory chemical analysis. TRCA will also be reviewing the existing partnerships and data needs in order to determine the potential for expanding the groundwater monitoring network within the GTA Regions. Flow and Precipitation The monitoring activities undertaken under the flow and precipitation component of the watershed monitoring network provide both direct information about the state /condition of water quantity in the region's streams as well as supportive information to aid in understanding the current biological conditions of aquatic habitat and species. In addition, the amount of water flowing in the region's streams is also intrinsically linked to surface water quality, both because of the known correlation between high flow and high levels of several contaminants it can deliver and the power associated with high flows to scour stream banks and beds resulting in increased suspended sediment and degraded water quality conditions. The activities and monitoring carried out as part of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program are designed to augment the Authority's existing network of flow, precipitation and snow gauging locations throughout the regions. In 2002 a total of six stream gauges, five precipitation gauges and three snow course monitoring sites were operated and maintained as part of this network. In 2003, TRCA will continue to operate and maintain the existing network of stream flow, precipitation and snow course monitoring stations. In addition, staff will be reviewing data needs and priorities, in order to determine if additional gauge sites are needed in the Region of Peel. RES. #H22/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: WET WEATHER FLOW MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN To provide an update on the City of Toronto Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan. David Switzer Steve Rutherford THAT the staff report on the Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan (WWFMMP), be received CARRIED BACKGROUND WWFMMP Goal: To reduce and ultimately eliminate the adverse effects of wet weather flow on the built and natural environment in a timely and sustainable manner, and to achieve a measurable improvement in ecosystem health of the watersheds. WWFMMP Vision Statement: "Wet Weather Flow will be managed on a watershed basis in a manner that recognizes rainwater as a potential resource to be utilized: to improve the health of Toronto's watercourses WnU7 H44 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 and the nearshore zones of Lake Ontario and to enhance the natural environment of Toronto's watersheds." When implemented, the Master Plan will make the Toronto region streams, rivers and waterfront cleaner and healthier. What is Wet Weather Flow? Wet weather flow is runoff that is generated when it rains or snows. In a natural setting, wet weather flow isn't usually a problem: when it rains, most of the stormwater naturally filters into the ground or is taken up by vegetation. But in Toronto, as in any modern city, it's a different story because we have changed the way water moves. Because so much of the city is paved, most of the rain that falls or snow that melts cannot filter into the ground. Instead, stormwater runs off roofs, roads and parking lots, trickles down drainpipes and empties into stormwater grates. It is then conveyed through an extensive system of storm sewers to outfalls (outlet pipes) where it gushes into streams, rivers and Lake Ontario. In an average rainstorm, billions of litres of stormwater are collected, stored and discharged into the rivers, creeks and Lake Ontario. Stormwater runoff picks up oil, grease, metals, pesticides and other pollutants and deposits them in streams and along the waterfront. In the older parts of the city, where combined sewers (single pipes that carry both sanitary sewage and stormwater) are still used, dilute sewage is discharged into our rivers and the waterfront in large rainstorms. There are no combined sewers in the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watersheds. Wet weather flow contributes to poor water clarity, high concentrations of nutrients and bacteria, elevated concentrations of metals and organic contaminants, increased water temperature and accumulation of trash. High levels of bacteria from storm sewers and combined sewer overflows cause rivers and waterfront beaches to be frequently unfit for swimming, especially after rainstorms. Many of the environmental impacts of wet weather flow are due to the vast amount of runoff that is generated when it rains. Large peak flows lead to surface flooding, increased erosion of streambanks, destruction of fish habitat and basement flooding The storm that took place on May 12th and 13th, 2000 showed why we need to act now to reduce the environmental impacts of wet weather flow. In this storm, Toronto received an average of 68 mm of rain, an amount that is predicted to fall only once every 25 to 50 years. The runoff exceeded the capacity of sewers in many parts of the city. As a result, over 2400 basements were flooded, extensive erosion took place in ravines and watercourses, major roads were closed and many roads, bridges, culverts and pipes were damaged. The cost to repair erosion damage alone is estimated to be over $3 million. When implemented, the Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan will ensure that this kind of destruction will be reduced. Wri Toe November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H45 WWFMMP Objectives: When it is implemented, the WWFMMP will contribute to: Healthier aquatic communities: Contribute to achieving healthy aquatic communities, including warmwater or coldwater fisheries as appropriate. Reduce fish consumption advisories: Contribute to reducing fish consumption advisories due to local wet weather sources. Reduce erosion impacts on habitats and property: Manage wet weather flows to reduce erosion impacts on stream and riparian habitats on public and private properties and open spaces. Re- establish a natural hydrologic cycle: Contribute to the re- establishment of a more natural hydrologic process, based on maximizing permeability and minimizing runoff at source. Re- establish and rehabilitate natural features (e.g., wetlands): Contribute to the protection, re- establishment and rehabilitation of natural features such as wetlands and ecological corridors. Virtual elimination of toxics through pollution prevention: Contribute to the virtual elimination of toxic contaminants in groundwater and surface water utilizing the principle of pollution prevention at source. Meet guidelines for water and sediment quality: Contribute to achieving federal, provincial and municipal water and sediment quality objectives and guidelines in area watercourses and along the waterfront. Eliminate discharges of sanitary sewage: Eliminate discharges of sanitary sewage including those associated with CSOs, SSOs, treatment plant bypasses, illegal cross - connections and spills. Improve water quality in rivers and the lake for body contact recreation: Improve water quality for body contact recreation in rivers and recreational areas and reduce posting of beaches by the Medical Officer of Health. Improve aesthetics: Contribute to eliminating objectionable deposits, nuisance algae growth, unnatural colour, turbidity and odour in order to improve the aesthetics of area surface waters. Reduce basement flooding: Manage wet weather flow to reduce basement flooding and other adverse impacts. Reduce infiltration and inflow to sanitary sewers: Reduce sanitary sewer infiltration and inflows to City design standards. Eliminate or minimize threats to life and property from flooding: Eliminate or minimize threat to life and property from flooding. wr1 20 H46 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 The Planning Process: The Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan provides the opportunity for these problems indicated above to be addressed in a holistic manner - to involve all stakeholders, to look at all the problems, and to devise the best strategy to address them. The Master Plan will allow us to look at a complete range of options and select the ones that are most likely to lead to healthy rivers and a healthy waterfront. The former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto began the development of the Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan in 1997. It is being developed in a staged manner under the Class Environmental Assessment process. There are three different ways of addressing stormwater issues: At Source: First, deal with stormwater where it falls.Conveyance: Next, deal with stormwater and combined sewage as it is being transported across the city. End -of -Pipe: Finally, deal with stormwater and combined sewage before it is discharged into our streams, rivers and Lake Ontario. Step 1, completed in December 1998, focussed on collecting data on environmental conditions and developing a vision, goal and objectives to guide the Master Plan process. The groundwork for the Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan was laid in Step 1. In consultation with a multi- stakeholder Steering Committee and the public, City of Toronto staff and technical consultants gathered and analyzed information on water quality, flows, pollutant loading, and practices used in other jurisdictions. Because of this work, there is now a more complete understanding of existing environmental conditions in Toronto and how wet weather flows affect our environment. Another important outcome of Step 1 of the Master Plan process was the adoption of a hierarchical approach to managing wet weather flows, one that reflects the "pollution prevention principle ": Step 2, (now underway) of the Master Plan process will culminate with the development of a Wet Weather Flow Management Strategy for the City. It will include by -laws, policies, projects, programs, a monitoring plan, an implementation plan and funding mechanisms. The aim of Step 2 of the Master Plan is to develop a Wet Weather Flow Management Strategy for the City of Toronto. The city has been divided into five study areas. Four of these generally conform to the boundaries of those portions of the major watersheds that lie within the City (Mimico and Etobicoke Creeks, the Humber River, the Don River, and the Rouge River and Highland Creek). The fifth study area includes all the parts of Toronto in which there are still combined sewers. This includes much of the former municipalities of Toronto, York and East York and the southwestern part of Scarborough. Data is also being collected on the entire watersheds. Recent activities include a public consultation process on the Preferred Strategies. Step 3 will focus on implementing the Master Plan. Wt12I0 November 28/02 ETOBICOKE- MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H47 Step 4 will monitor the Plan's effectiveness and update it where and when needed. Implications for the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds: A draft 25 year Master Plan implementation schedule was provided to recent WWFMMP workshop participants. The preferred strategies that have been developed for the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds include: Source controls (e.g., downspout disconnect) Conveyance controls (e.g., pervious technologies, enhanced ditches) • Controlling of basement flooding (e.g., pipe replacement) • Municipal operations (e.g., street sweeping, catch basin cleaning) • Channel rehabilitation (stream restoration, removal of fish barriers) • Public education and community outreach • Environmental monitoring and plan review • End of pipe (ponds and infiltration basins, underground facilities, oil /grit separators) Implementation of these strategies will take place on a south to north basis in order to have the most impact. Etobicoke Creek undertakings will focus on the waterfront, constructing stormwater ponds, stormwater storage tanks and oil /grit separators and channel rehabilitation. Implementation in Mimico Creek is focussed further up the creek, on constructing stormwater ponds and oil /grit separators, channel rehabilitation and conveyance controls. The timing of implementation varies according to the type of undertaking and the overall benefit of the undertaking. RES. #H23/02 - Moved by Seconded by: GREATER TORONTO AIRPORT AUTHORITY (GTAA) PARTNERSHIP WITH THE TRCA LIVING CITY CAMPAIGN - ETOBICOKE CREEK To provide an update on the GTAA partnership and associated projects. Bette -Ann Goldstein Diana Karrandjas THAT the staff report on the GTAA partnership projects for Etobicoke Creek be received; AND FURTHER THAT staff report back to the Etobicoke - Mimico Coalition on the completion of the projects under the partnership CARRIED BACKGROUND TRCA staff received confirmation that the GTAA was interested in partnering to address environmental issues of mutual interest in September 2001. The partnership through the Living City campaign results in $270,000 worth of funding for projects to be completed within the 2002 -2004 time frame. The projects include an Aquatic Ecosystem, Terrestrial Natural H48 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 Heritage, Stormwater Management, Business Outreach component and a City and Countryside Project: A Case Study of LBPIA Development. Aquatic Ecosystem The TRCA will complete a Fish Management Plan for Etobicoke Creek that will provide future management direction for the watershed. In the near future, further development of the airport property and construction of an east -west runway is proposed. The runway expansion will entail the relocation of a section of the main branch of Etobicoke Creek, as well as an extension of the culvert on Spring Creek. These alterations are considered destruction of fish habitat, and as such the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) require compensation works to be completed. Through previous discussions with DFO, TRCA. MNR and GTAA staff, it has been agreed that the compensation works, or "habitat banking," will be considered both on and off airport lands. The three products of the Aquatic Ecosystem project are the preparation of a Fisheries Management Plan for Etobicoke Creek, the Selection of Priority Restoration Sites, and the Preparation of Concept Plans for Priority Restoration Sites. Terrestrial Natural Heritage The TRCA, in developing its Terrestrial Natural Heritage(TNH) strategy, will produce a regeneration and wildlife strategy for the airport lands as part of the broader plan for the watersheds. The model will identify key restoration opportunities based on the TNH strategy while accounting for the operational constraints of the airport. The expansion plans for Pearson International Airport include alteration of the Etobicoke Creek and existing adjacent terrestrial habitats. This alteration will have upstream and downstream impacts on wildlife and ecological communities of the area, and on ecosystem processes and function. Application of the TRCA's methodology for terrestrial habitat will help to mitigate against any negative impacts cause by the development, and to show where improvements are possible. The TRCA recognizes that the GTAA has an Airport Wildlife Management Control Program in place, and that any work undertaken should be in compliance with this program. An important component of the proposed work will be the integration of aquatic, hydrological, and recreational plans for the GTAA property and adjacent lands. The terrestrial inventory and the proposed modelling process will be undertaken in coordination with the TRCA staff working on these other aspects of the overall project, and with existing municipal plans for the adjacent properties. Stormwater Management The purpose of this project is to produce a Retrofit Strategy within and upstream of the airport lands in order to reduce flooding, erosion and water quality impacts of uncontrolled stormwater runoff on the Etobicoke Creek tributaries. First, the current Etobicoke Creek hydrology model requires updating to a continuous and re- calibrating. This update will include the modeling of all existing and proposed stormwater management facilities such that a detailed erosion analysis can be undertaken. This analysis will determine optimum pond release rates and volumes to mitigate erosion impacts resulting from uncontrolled runoff which, in turn, should minimize the need for future in- stream works. wnt!z November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H49 Second, an assessment of existing stream conditions is required to rank the stability of each reach. Reaches will be ranked as stable, moderately stable or unstable, which will assist in prioritizing the SWM retrofits to optimize erosion control benefits (i.e., minimize the need for future in- stream works). Reaches that will require in- stream work regardless of the retrofit strategy will also be identified /prioritized and preliminary costs developed for this in- stream work. In addition to the end -of -pipe stormwater retrofits as noted above, opportunities may exist to implement source and conveyance SWM retrofits. Source controls include measures such as downspout disconnections, rain barrels, etc. Conveyance controls include measures such as perforated pipes, roadside ditches, etc. This study will map those areas where such measures are considered feasible. This study will also assess the potential to retrofit existing dry SWM facilities on the airport lands to provide quality and erosion control. Subject to determining the feasibility of retrofitting theses facilities, preliminary design(s) and cost estimate(s) will be provided. A spill management study is currently underway to document spills within the municipalities of Richmond Hill, Vaughan and Markham. This study will be expanded to the Etobicoke Creek watershed upstream of the airport. The purpose of the study is to identify spill hot spots. Should these hot spots fall within the catchment of an identified retrofit pond, they could potentially be managed by retrofitting the pond. A key issue to be addressed in any retrofit strategy is the identification of funding necessary to implement the recommended works. Funding for retrofits will generally be administered by the local municipality, each of which currently has (or will have) its own individual approach. This study will summarize /document current funding mechanisms and provide projections of collected funds based upon an assessment of infill and redevelopment potential within the study area. Business Outreach The institutional / commercial / industrial (ICI) business sector is a key partner in implementing the best management practices of Greening Our Watersheds. Large industrial parks and campus buildings with extensive impermeable surfaces present special challenges to implementing site and lot level stormwater control, spills abatement, and habitat enhancement on properties adjacent to valley lands. The TRCA has initiated several Business Outreach programs across the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) based on business, or business association, partnerships: the Frenchman's Bay Project in Pickering, Langstaff EcoPark in Vaughan, West Toronto Business Environment Group, the Bartley Smith Greenway, and the Living City River Partner program. Local and Regional municipalities traditionally support projects and benefit from the community -based investment in the local environment. The Business Stewardship Program proposes to build on the airport's success by committing businesses upstream to adopt sustainable best management practices. The approach involves a commitment to a short-term project, the development of an in -house champion, and building on individual successes through social marketing. The project will educate through Wn213 H50 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 meaningful in -the- ground actions. The project derives its mandate from, and is integrated with, other TRCA initiatives including the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Strategy, Etobicoke Creek Fish Management Plan and Greening Our Watersheds Strategy targets. STATUS Work on the project is ongoing through 2003 and 2004. The Aquatic component will have had its second public meeting and produced a draft plan and selection of restoration sites by the end of 2002. The Terrestrial Natural Heritage component will have mapped landscape level communities and will be conducting site specific inventories in the spring of 2003. The Stormwater projects are ongoing, while the Business Outreach study will produce an area characterization map and business prospects list by early 2003. RES. #H24/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: i COMMUNITY ACTION AREAS UPDATE To provide an overview of the three existing community action areas and to outline the work plan that details the development of additional community action area plans. Steve Rutherford Gerry Gorman THAT the staff report on the three community action areas (Heart Lake, Malton, South Mimico) be received; AND FURTHER THAT the work plan detailing the development of additional community action area plans be endorsed CARRIED BACKGROUND Community action areas and their plans are intended to be the vehicle for implementing the watershed management strategy at the community level. Their development and implementation is intended to foster community awareness and support, to promote backyard change and to serve as an avenue for funding. Successful implementation of the watershed strategies through the community action area plans is dependant upon a number of factors coming together. These factors include municipal and agency support, community support and involvement, technical support, and funding. Extensive consultation with all partners is essential. Developing the plans is based on the theories of consensus and capacity building. Implementing the plans is dependent on a core group of community volunteers for each area. 1M'LIN November 28/02' ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H51 At Task Force meeting #10 /00, the community action area plans were discussed and the following resolution was endorsed: "THAT the Task Force develop community action area plans as a tool for use in implementing the watershed management strategies at the community level; THAT community action area plans be developed by the Task Force for the following areas and incorporated in the watershed management strategy document that will be developed: Mimico Creek - Mouth to Bloor Street, Heart Lake, and Malton, as shown on the attached maps; THAT the Task Force's Working Groups develop draft community action area plans for the above areas, to illustrate how and what management strategies should be implemented at the community level; That the Working Groups report back to the Task Force in Spring 2001 with their draft community action area plans, and that a workshop be held during a subsequent Task Force meeting to integrate these plans; THAT opportunities for public consultation be provided and comments incorporated accordingly; THAT the final community action area plans be incorporated in the watershed management strategy document, with appropriate text to be developed by the writer. AND FURTHER THAT future Watershed Alliances be requested to continue to develop community action area plans within the watersheds to correspond with need, timing, and funding availability." Subsequent to that meeting, Community Action Areas and their associated plans were developed in three Etobicoke and Mimico Creek watershed reaches: Heart Lake Community Action Area Malton Community Action Area Mimico Creek - Mouth to Bloor Street Community Action Area (renamed: South Mimico Community Action Area) Heart Lake Community Action Area: The Heart Lake Community Action Area is located in the City of Brampton, and is bounded by the Highway #410 extension on the north, Kennedy Road on the west, Bovaird Drive on the south, and the east side of the Highway #410 extension on the east (Highway #410 extension runs north then west through this community action area). This area is comprised of relatively new residential subdivisions on the west, Heart Lake Conservation Area, the Highway #410 extension, the Mayfield Wetland Complex on the north side of Mayfield Road, and extensive agricultural areas that are committed for development. There are four cultural heritage sites H52 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 within this area, and an extensive heritage report has been prepared. The major issues facing this area include the series of disconnected natural habitats that are being further threatened by development, and the extension of the Highway. The community action plan for Heart Lake focuses on connecting natural habitats (primarily wetlands), protecting fragmented habitats through land securement, improving the water quality of Heart lake, working with the community to promote environmentally friendly "backyard practices" which include reducing the use of pesticides, lot level stormwater control, participating in environmental monitoring programs, and working with developers and municipalities to ensure sustainable future development. Over the past three years there has been a significant number of environmental initiatives undertaken within this area, focussed within the Heart Lake Conservation Area. The east shoreline of Heart Lake has been transformed from a straight, gabion lined wall to a more natural meandering shoreline with aquatic plants, root wads and riparian cover. Part of the walking trail along the east shore has been moved to the hill slope to reduce trampling. A sand dune ecosystem was planted with native vegetation on the north side of the beach. The size of the Horseshoe Wetland has been greatly expanded, linking the wet area to the adjacent upland forest. Exciting events such as the Peel Children's Water Festival and the Heart Lake Bird Banding Event have also been held on the property. Our community partners for these projects include the Heart Lake area Girl Guides, TD Canada Trust Friends of the Environment Foundation, Environment Canada Sustainability Fund, and the Ministry of Natural Resources CFWIP program. Malton Community Action Area: The Malton Community Action Area is located in Mississauga, and is comprised of a large multi - cultural residential community and an equally large industrial /commercial business area. The area boundaries are the railway line to the north, Airport Road and Pearson International Airport on the west, and Highway #427 on the east (Airport Road and Highway #427 meet to form a southern point). The residential area is characterized by single family dwellings and apartments, with many local area schools within walking distance of the creek. The business district, located south of Derry Road, contains no "green" areas other than Wildwood Park, and there is no comprehensive stormwater management program in place. The Malton community action area contains eight cultural heritage sites, which are documented within the area's heritage report. Adoption of Malton as a community action area has a number of inherent benefits. First, it is the only residential area in Mississauga that lies within the Mimico Creek watershed. Second, the natural stream corridors have been altered through past development practices, and much of the surrounding stream corridor lands are bare of vegetation other than grass. Third, there is a local high school, Lincoln Alexander Secondary School, interested in participating in regeneration activities. Two teachers from Westwood Secondary School are co- members of the Coalition. j,,1r121(p November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H53 The community action area plan for Malton focuses on regenerating the Malton Greenway, Derrry Greenway and Brandon Gate riparian corridors, mitigating the effects of five fish barriers, connecting local trails, working with the community to improve stormwater quality and quantity through stewardship programs, and developing a business outreach strategy to be implemented in the business district. Over the past three years there has been a number of riparian plantings undertaken by community groups such as the Canadian Institute for Environmental Research and Development (CIREAD), Punjabi Community Health Centre, and local schools, along the Greenways and in Wildwood Park. These events were sponsored by the City of Mississauga and the TRCA. South Mimico Community Action Area: The South Mimico Community Action Area is located within the City of Toronto, along Mimico Creek from Bloor Street south to Lake Ontario. It is comprised of older residential areas, Ontario Hydro lands, the Bonar Community Action Site, Humber Bay Park, and contains nine cultural heritage sites. There is also an extensive cultural heritage report about this area. The community action plan for South Mimico focuses on renaturalizing channelized sections of the creek, mitigating the effects of fish barriers, fixing in- stream erosion, vallley land securement, sustainable development of brownfields (lands that are abandoned, idle or underused, and difficult to develop because of real or perceived environmental contamination), and working with the community to implement environmentally friendly "backyard habitat" practices. Initiatives that have been accomplished to date include the restoration of the mouth of Mimico Creek just south of Lakeshore Boulevard through the creation and enhancement of wetland habitats, plantings with the community group Friends of Mimico Creek in the southern reaches, renaturalization of the riparian corridor at Royal York Road and erosion control work. Work plan for the development of additional community action area plans: The Task Force agreed that there would be a total of 19 community action areas and associated plans developed throughout the two watersheds, covering the entire watersheds area. In accordance with Greening Our Watersheds, all 19 plans must be developed by 2006 to meet the scheduled target. The prioritization of these areas within the work plan below was based on existing community interest, Coalition contacts within those communities, and other existing opportunities. For example, developing community action area plans for industrial areas will be undertaken once the business outreach plan is completed (impacts areas 15 - West Mimico and 17 - North Toronto). The work plan is to be used as a general guide, the timing of plan development for the sites may be modified as circumstances change. Within the chart, the numbers reflect the numbering of the mapped community action area boundaries on page 272 of Greening Our Watersheds. H54 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 TIMING OF COMMUNITY ACTION AREA PLAN DEVELOPMENT 2003 2004 2005 2006 3) Snelgrove 2) Etobicoke Creek Headwaters 6) Spring Creek 5) South Brampton 16) Mimico Headwaters 11) South Mississauga 7) Central Spring Creek 9) North Mississauga 18) Central Toronto 12) Little Etobicoke Creek 8) South Spring Creek 15) West Mimico 4) Downtown Brampton 13) Renforth Creek 10) Central Mississauga 17) North Toronto 20) Pearson International Airport: Falls within both watersheds and is being treated as a case study. Implementation of the community action area plans will be undertaken as opportunities and need arise. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Staff and the Coalition to pursue development of the 2003 community action area plans through an extensive consultation process. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding to proceed with the development of community action area work plans, reports, and plans is proposed in the 2003 budget and will continue to be a priority in future budget submissions until all 16 plans are complete. Funding for the implementation of these plans will be secured on a priority basis in future years. RES. #H25/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: COMMUNITY ACTION SITE UPDATE To provide an overview of the existing community action site: Bonar Community Action Site. David Lyons Chris Barnett THAT the staff report on the Bonar Community Action Site be received CARRIED wt12I( November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H55 BACKGROUND At Task Force meeting #10 /00, the following resolution was endorsed: "THAT the Task Force develop community action site plans as a tool for use in implementing the watershed management strategies at the site level with community involvement; That community action site plans be developed by the Task Force for the following areas, as shown on the attached maps: - Mouth of Mimico Creek; - Van Dusen Corridor; - Heart Lake Conservation Area; and - Malton Greenway; THAT the Task Force's Working Groups develop draft community action site plans for the above areas, to illustrate how and what management strategies should be implemented at the site level; THAT the Working Groups report back to the Task Force in Spring 2001 with their draft community action site plans, and that a workshop be held during a subsequent Task Force meeting to integrate these plans. THAT opportunities for public consultation be provided and comments incorporated accordingly; THAT the final community action site plans be incorporated in the watershed management strategy document, with appropriate text to be developed by the writer. AND FURTHER THAT future Watershed Alliances be requested to continue to develop community action site plans." To date, one area has been determined to be a community action site - Bonar Wetland. The Van Dusen Corridor had been developed as a community action site, but this was later rescinded because the project did not meet the community action site criteria. At meeting #7/01, the following resolution was endorsed: THAT the Heart Lake, Malton and South Mimico Community Action Area plans and the Bonar Community Action Site Plan be approved by the Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force; THAT final edits to the plans, pursuant to Editorial Subcommittee recommendations, be prepared for September, 2001; AND FURTHER THAT the plans be incorporated into Greening Our Watersheds during the Layout and Design process." 1,0r1 II 9 H56 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 The development and implementation of watershed management strategies is a nested approach. Management strategies are developed that describe what should be done to improve watershed health; community action area plans are intended to be the vehicle for implementing the watershed management strategy at the community level; and community action sites are intended to be the vehicle for implementing the watershed management strategy at the site level through the community. The development and implementation of community action site plans is intended to foster community awareness and support, and to serve as an avenue for funding. Similar to the action plans, successful implementation of the watershed strategies through the community action site plans is dependant upon a number of factors coming together. These factors include municipal and agency support, community support and involvement, technical support and funding. Extensive consultation with all partners is essential. Developing the plans is based on the theories of consensus and capacity building. Implementing the plans is dependent on a core group of community volunteers for each area. Within each community action area, community action site plans will be developed for each a number of different locations. Sites that are considered candidates for community action site planning must have a number of factors. Two key factors are (1) opportunities to integrate a number of the watershed management strategies in one location, and (2) opportunities to involve the public in a safe and meaningful way. Bonar Community Action Site The Bonar Community Action Site project proposes to re- create the historic Mimico Creek wetland, meadow and associated forest buffer and to improve Bonar Creek itself through natural channel design techniques and a stormwater facility, on a portion of public land owned by the City of Toronto. The project also proposes to provide trail connections to the site from both the waterfront and the watershed via an extension of the waterfront trail in Humber Bay Park northward to Bloor Street and beyond. Location and Historical Context The Bonar wetland project site is located on the west side of Mimico Creek in the flood plain. The site is east of Legion Road, north of Lake Shore Boulevard West and south of the CNR tracks. Historically, the site was the wetland marsh that formed the mouth of Mimico Creek (see photo). Beginning in the early part of the 20th century, Lake Shore Boulevard was constructed, the wetland was filled, and the now- decommissioned Etobicoke Sewage Treatment Plant was built. The mouth of the creek is now located south of Lake Shore Boulevard in Humber Bay Park, built by TRCA in the 1970s. Project Design The Bonar wetland will be approximately 1.78 hectares in size, (with a total park area of almost 5 hectares). The wetland will include a stormwater catchment area, sediment forebay, cattail thickets, hemi- marsh, lowland and upland riparian zones. The wetland design will promote the growth of submergent aquatic plants to improve the settling capability and nutrient removal LA j'122 -0 November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H57 within the wetland. Substrate flow will cool the water, facilitate nutrient removal and force storm flows through the cattails which provides a further degree of mechanical filtering. The wetland outfall will consist of a seasonal pike spawning area. Native aquatic and terrestrial vegetation will be used throughout the project, and large stones and rocks will provide loafing and basking areas for reptiles and other wildlife. The fill that is currently restricting the movement of Bonar Creek will be removed, and Bonar Creek will be repositioned using natural channel design techniques to create a natural meander pattern and healthy aquatic habitat. Adjacent to the wetland and naturalized Bonar Creek will be meadow and forest edge habitats, as well as improved riparian habitats. Through these areas there will be pedestrian and cycle trails, interpretive signs, heritage artifacts representative of the site, and rest spots. The trail connection to the south will include a link through property owned by TRCA adjacent to Mimico Creek to Humber Bay Park. Pedestrian and bicycle crossing of Lake Shore Boulevard at the existing lights, or potentially a new crosswalk, will be available. Construction of the trail will also involve enhancements to the riparian zone. The trail connection to the north will include a link either under the CNR tracks via the proposed extension of Legion Road, or under the CNR bridge that traverses Mimico Creek. There is also potential to work with the Royal Ontario Museum and additional partners to develop a heritage monument in celebration of the now extinct passenger pigeon. The aboriginal meaning of the name "mimico" is "resting place of wild pigeons." Short-Term Site Plan Initiatives On site, the TRCA has conducted water quality, sediment quality, bio- monitoring (clams), and temperature recordings as well as Phase 1 and Phase II environmental site assessments. The Phase 11 site assessment concluded that the Sewage Treatment Plant, industrial uses, and deposition of fill on the site have had a potentially adverse impact upon soil conditions. The results of the site investigations for the portion of City property outside the treatment plant boundary indicate that approximately 55,000 cubic metres of fill have been placed on this site, and most of the material exceeds the Ministry of Environment Table B criteria (primarily for heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons). Additional contaminated fill is anticipated within the treatment plant boundary, but these soil tests have not been undertaken to date. Further site investigations will be required to delineate the exact extent of the impacted fill. TRCA staff and Task Force members also had a preliminary meeting with staff of the Royal Ontario Museum to discuss the passenger pigeon monument. FINANCIAL DETAILS • Funding to proceed with the development of the Bonar Community Action Site on an interim basis is available, although complete project funds have not been achieved. • Funding to develop additional community action sites will be solicited on a site -by -site basis in the future. H58 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 RES. #H26/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: REGENERATION PROJECTS To provide an overview of ongoing projects and their planning and design; construction and planting status; and recently completed regeneration projects. Bette -Ann Goldstein Randy McGill THAT the staff report on regeneration projects be received CARRIED BACKGROUND Ongoing regeneration projects are site specific improvements to the natural environment. The mandate for these projects comes from the Remedial Action Plan, TRCA business plan and now Greening Our Watersheds. Projects are dependent on good plans, funding, timely approvals, realistic implementation timelines and partners. The projects below are at different stages of implementation and it is foreseen that the Habitats Group of the Coalition will recommend further sites for regeneration through the Community Action Area planning process, as well as support implementation for some ongoing projects. The project descriptions are brief, and more in -depth information will be presented to the Coalition on individual projects in the future. This report provides an overview of 30 ongoing watershed regeneration projects and their background studies under the following headings: A) Ongoing Studies - Both Watersheds B) Projects in the Planning / Design Phase - Mimico Creek C) Projects in the Planning / Design Phase - Etobicoke Creek D) Projects in the Construction / Planting Phase - Mimico Creek E) Projects in the Construction / Planting Phase - Etobicoke Creek F) Recently Completed Projects - Both Watersheds Only one project at this time, Bonar Creek, has been formally designated as a Community Action Site by the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds Task Force. The Coalition Working Teams will consider these projects within their workplans, future committees will implement projects currently being planned, and members are encouraged to volunteer to officially represent the Coalition at planting, stewardship and community events associated with the projects below. A) ONGOING STUDIES - BOTH WATERSHEDS Etobicoke - Mimico Habitat Implementation Plan This study involves the prioritization of habitat restoration /creation sites, development of regeneration plans for sites, and eventual implementation as funding and resource opportunities arise. The inventory will be completed in early 2003. The regeneration plans may be implemented by the Coalition through the three existing Community Action Areas, and in the future, incorporated into new Community Action Area Plans. November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H59 Fisheries Management Plans The preparation of Fisheries Management Plans (FMPs) includes two products related to regeneration project sites: the selection of priority aquatic restoration sites, and the preparation of concept plans. The concept sites will be selected and developed in 2003/2004 first along Etobicoke Creek in order to fulfil the commitments of the Greater Toronto Airport Authority project. Other aquatic restoration concept sites may be identified and incorporated into Community Action Area Plans or implemented concurrently depending on funding opportunities. Healthy Yards Pesticide Reduction Kit The program focuses on reducing the cosmetic use of pesticides on residential lawns. The program will target three Community Action Areas in the Etobicoke and Mimico watersheds (Malton, Heart Lake, South Mimico), one area in the Humber watershed (Woodbridge), and one area in the Don watershed (Summerhill), with potential to expand to other locations. The program is based on the Weedgee Kidz program of the Caledon Countryside Alliance. A Pesticide Reduction information kit will be distributed on a door -to -door basis by teams of students who will educate residents about how they can achieve healthy lawns without the use of pesticides. B) PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING / DESIGN PHASE - MIMICO CREEK Bonar Creek Wetland The project proposes to re- create the historic Mimico Creek wetland, meadow and forest. Bonar Creek will be improved through natural channel design. A stormwater facility will provide quantity and quality control and integrate with the other habitat components on site such as a hemi- marsh, cattail thickets, and pike spawning habitat. The project also proposes to establish trail connections from the waterfront trail in Humber Bay Park northward towards Bloor Street. In 2003, TRCA will complete a phase III environmental site assessment and determine the extent of soil contamination to better calculate the cost and potential options for soil remediation and feasibility of the project. Mimico Estate Design and Feasibility Study The purpose of this study is to develop concept designs and associated feasibility calculations for several different restoration scenarios for three kilometres of Mimico creek and 250 metres of concrete channel under the Gardiner Expressway. The main features include channel naturalization, drop structure mitigation and low flow channel construction, aquatic habitat improvements, trail connections and potential pedestrian footbridges, and a constructed wetland habitat complex. Depending on the feasibility calculations and potential scope of the Mimico Estate project provincial class environmental assessment processes will need to be coordinated, if federal funding is sought for implementation the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act process is triggered. Other ongoing projects adjacent to the study area include private sector condominium and townhouse developments, the Bonar Wetland Restoration Community Action Site (TRCA), Mimico Linear Park Environmental Assessment (TRCA), and Hydro Lands Restoration (Friends of Mimico Creek, TRCA, City of Toronto, Hydro One). wM Z23 H60 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 Malton Community Action Area Plan and Volunteer! Malton The Malton Community Action Area Plan, as outlined in the strategy includes various restoration project sites along the Derry and Malton Greenways, Wildwood Park, the large business park south of Derry Rd. and with schools including Lincoln Alexander. Actions include on -going stewardship work with the Malton community such as habitat regeneration, community events and clean -ups. South Mimico Community Action Area Plan and Friends of Mimico Creek Friends of Mimico Creek have conducted clean -ups, planted regeneration sites such as the Hydro Lands and have participated in the development of the South Mimico Community Action Area Plan and Greening Our Watersheds. In addition, the Friends were involved in many other community issues including Toronto's Pedestrian Charter. This largely residential Community Action Area contains the Mouth of Mimico Wetland project, Bonar Community Action site, Mimico Estate study, and Reid Manor Park erosion control project. Active residents' associations, such as the Thompson- Orchard Ratepayers, conduct annual clean -up events and are very active on issues such as swales, trails and the health of the local Mimico Creek watershed environment. Reid Manor Park Erosion Control Project Located within the South Mimico Community Action Area, Reid Manor Park is a high priority erosion control site. Work to rehabilitate a slumped bank and eroded trail will take place in the winter of 2003. The undertaking will require moving heavy machinery through this parkette and subsequent site remediation. C) PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING / DESIGN PHASE - ETOBICOKE CREEK Brampton Diversion Channel Naturalization Feasibility Study A small study is being undertaken in 2002 to investigate the naturalization opportunities of the Brampton Diversion Channel, which is a 585 metre long trapezoidal concrete channel with a large drop- structure at the outlet. The channel drop- structure divides upstream and downstream natural habitat corridors, and the channel itself does not provide any aquatic habitat . Once the study is completed, a consultation phase will begin to determine if the project should proceed. If the scope of the project includes the entire channel structure, a full Environmental Assessment will be required. If the project scope focuses solely on the outlet structure, a CEAA screening report will be required. Heart Lake Conservation Area Management Plan Development A management plan will be developed for the Heart Lake Conservation Area that will involve a major consultative process with the local community, Area users and local and regional governments, to best plan the Area's physical environment as well as the recreational experience offered at Heart Lake. A management plan consists of identifying existing land uses identifying planning and policy initiatives that have affected or potentially could affect the management of the lands, and using this information to determine priorities for future initiatives. This will include the protection of natural features and habitat regeneration, and determining the types of activities that will be permitted in the different areas of the property. Wr1 2 ZY November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H61 Snelgrove Management Plan Implementation The Snelgrove Valley and Stream Corridor Reach Plan was first developed in 1994 and was subsequently revised in 1999. Implementation will focus on the Loafer's Lake area and will involve the local community, service clubs and City of Brampton in the development of a new Community Action Area Plan and in- the - ground shoreline restoration and riparian planting projects. GTAA Business Stewardship Area Characterization Study The Greater Toronto Airports Authority has granted the TRCA seed funding to develop a business stewardship program for the largest industrial park in the GTA located to the north, south and west of the airport in the Etobicoke Creek watershed. The program will develop a study area map, characterizing potential key business partners to develop lot level best practices to address spills, stormwater and habitat regeneration projects. The mapping study will also identify potential new business greenway sites and will direct the business community in the area to restoration sites identfied by the Fisheries Management Plan, Terrestrial Natural Heritage Plan, Stormwater Management retrofit studies (Toronto, Brampton, Mississauga), as well as the Etobicoke - Mimico Habitat Implementation Plan. Heart Lake Community Action Area Plan and Volunteer! Heart Lake The Heart Lake Community Action area includes the Conservation Area, surrounding residential and agricultural lands and future development lands to the west, north and east. Volunteer! Heart Lake will be a stewardship group actively engaged in implementing the Community Action Area Plan and developing the Conservation Area Management Plan. Toronto Golf Club Dam Mitigation of the first barrier to fish passage on Etobicoke Creek is currently on hold as the Toronto Golf Club investigates alternative irrigation options. An engineering study completed in 1999 concluded that the in- stream structure had a potential lifespan of five more years. TRCA worked in partnership with the Golf Club on developing a design for a rocky ramp and obtaining funding for construction materials. Chinguacousy Park natural channel restoration The City of Brampton has completed designs for the restoration of Etobicoke Creek within Chinguacousy Park involving disconnection from the duck ponds, regrading to form a natural meander and channel, and native riparian plantings. Public meetings on the proposed designs are currently taking place. Implementation will depend on funding, partnerships, and could take up to 15 years to complete. D) PROJECTS IN THE CONSTRUCTION / PLANTING PHASE - MIMICO CREEK Malton & Derry Greenways This is a community -based naturalization project focusing on extending the riparian zone through an urban neighbourhood within the Malton area, in partnership with community members and established groups. This is an important component of the TRCA Multi- Cultural Stewardship Program and has been at the heart of a successful partnership with the City of Mississauga. H62 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 Royal York TRCA recently acquired a parcel of land adjacent to Mimico Creek. The land requires reforestation and riparian habitat enhancement. The property contained non - native, ornamental tree and shrub species, an access road, a bridge, and the land was partially cleared. The property was surrounded by riparian and upland forest habitat on Conservation Authority valley and stream lands. The goal is to re- create native forest and riparian habitat, completing the natural habitat corridor along Mimico Creek in this area. Van Dusen Severe bank erosion is occurring along Mimico creek just south of Bloor street creating an unstable slope and threatening private property in the area. The footpath trail has been severely eroded and presents an unsafe situation. This high - priority site will see erosion control work undertaken to remedy the situation after private property / conservation easement issues are resolved. E) PROJECTS IN THE CONSTRUCTION / PLANTING PHASE - ETOBICOKE CREEK Heart Lake Conservation Area a) Horseshoe Wetland Heart Lake Area District Girl Guides and Scouts have connected a small wetland to a larger forest, planted riparian and aquatic species, raised funds for planting material, and involved more than 400 of their members in the project. Funding was received from the Friends of the Environment and Conservation Foundation to erect an interpretive sign on site to describe the project and its ecological benefits. The project is approximately one third complete and will eventually fill the cut -grass "bowl" around the wetland. b) Sand Dune Garden To commemorate the launch of Greening our Watersheds in June 2002, a sensitive sand dune ecosystem was established along the boardwalk and swimming area of Heart Lake. Habitat components and plants will be added to the garden periodically to enhance the ecosystem. An interpretive sign above the Sand Dune Garden on the boardwalk explains its significance c) Peel Children's Water Festival The 2002 PCWF featured over 5200 children (grades 2 -6), hundreds of secondary school volunteers, and hundreds of Public Day visitors experiencing activities aimed at educating people about water conservation, pollution and habitats. Students planted over 1500 soft - stem bulrushes, 500 native lilies and over 200 kg of native perrennial grass seed along the eastern shoreline. They were also involved in planting the Sand Dune Garden on Public Day and a large bur oak by the Horseshoe Wetland. The Public Day also featured a trout release on the shoreline. The 2003 PCWF is Thursday, May 29'h to Thursday, June 4th with Saturday May 315t designated as Public Day Various planting activities demonstrating erosion, habitat and water quality themes are planned. Pratt & Whitney wetland Since 1996, Pratt & Whitney Canada staff and family volunteers have contributed their time and effort toward the regeneration of the Etobicoke Creek valley corridor in proximity to the PWC wry 2Zte November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H63 Mississauga (22) plant. The focus has been the re- establishment of trees and shrubs to expand the remnant forest cover along the north facing valley slope. In 1997, a small section of pedestrian trail was constructed. The trail provides a safe access to the river valley and offers an enjoyable recreational activity for employees. Wildlife sightings are a regular occurrence with fox, deer, hawks and heron all being reported by staff. The PWC Mississauga office receives funds through the recycling of paper at its Quebec and Ontario plants for their regeneration efforts. More than 350 volunteer participants have planted 2695 trees and shrubs across approximately 2 hectares of valleyland corridor. The City of Mississauga and TRCA are long- standing partners in this initiative. Funding requests have been submitted for phase II riparian enhancements and creation of a wetland. This next phase in the project proposes the creation of 0.2 hectare wetland /wet meadow habitat and 0.8 hectares of riparian forest habitat, installation of structural habitat features (snags, basking logs, hibernacula, etc.) and associated aquatic and riparian forest node vegetation planting with partners. Etobicoke Valley Park bank stabilization This project is located south of the Queen Elizabeth Way and west of Horner Avenue, on Etobicoke Creek. A section of gabion basket protection has deteriorated resulting in localized erosion of approximately a seventy -metre section of the creek bank, including damage to a section of the asphalt pedestrian trail. Additional sections of gabion protection are in danger of collapsing resulting in potentially further bank and path erosion. Department of Fisheries and Oceans approvals are pending with construction proposed for winter 2003. F) RECENTLY COMPLETED PROJECTS - BOTH WATERSHEDS Hydro Lands The area includes 2.6 kilometres of Mimico Creek and surrounding valley lands from the CN Rail tracks in the south to the Queensway Bridge in the north and is approximately 10 hectares total area. In Spring 2000 an agreement was signed with Ontario Hydro to conduct a three - phase project within the corridor: phase I- riparian planting, phase II - meadow / upland planting, and phase III- a wetland habitat. Over 1500 native stems have been planted since with the Friends of the Mimico Creek including Staghorn Sumac, Heart- Leaved Willow, Alternate Leaved Dogwood, Common Elderberry, Silverberry, Chokecherry, American Highbush Cranberry, Silky Dogwood, Service Berry, Common Elderberry, Nannyberry and Red Osier Dogwood. Phase I and II of the project have been completed. An access agreement signed with Hydro One Distribution Networks to conduct soil and other surveys for the implementation of Phase III, the construction of a wetland habitat, was signed in 2002. The area will also be incorporated into the larger Mimico Estate design concepts and feasibility study. Humber Bay Parks Butterfly Habitat The Humber Bay Butterfly Habitat (HBBH) is an ecological restoration project that provides critical habitat for a variety of native butterfly species. It incorporates a diversity of native wildflowers, shrubs, trees, grasses and physical features known to support butterflies throughout their entire life cycle. The project is an opportunity to create habitat, while providing educational and interpretive opportunities for park visitors. HBBH components include a short grass prairie, wildflower meadow and home garden. The home garden has been designed to demonstrate how butterfly habitat can easily incorporated into your own backyard. Lying in the wri 1.2 7 H64 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 centre of the HBBH, the home garden is the most formal component. It incorporates ornamental and native plants in three flowerbeds, highlights artwork from local artisans and features stonework which act as excellent warming spots for butterflies. Mouth of Mimico Spawning Channel and Wetland The wetland restoration work started in 1992 within the western embayment located immediately south of Lakeshore Road and north of the pedestrian bridge. In 1992, a series of planting plots were established to determine if wetland plants could grow in the accumulated sediment bedload. Over the past eight years the aquatic plants have colonized a sizable portion of the western embayment and through the TRCA Aquatic Plants program, continues to be planted with native aquatic and riparian species. The overall footprint of the berm on the west side is 492 m2 with a net gain of 5046m2 of wetland. The overall footprint of the berm on the east side of the channel is 512m2 with a gain of 1376m2 of wetland. To increase the habitat diversity for wildlife, tree stumps, Togs and anchored trees were placed throughout the site. Monitoring has shown a significant increase in the amount of wetland vegetation growing within the embayment. While there has not been sufficient time to make any conclusions about avian and herptiles use of the area, they do appear to be increasing. Further enhancement of the estuary is expected to result in further improvements in the avian, fish and herptile communities. Mouth of Etobicoke Riparian Planting Marie Curtis Park is one of 23 sites that were initially identified and developed within the Toronto Waterfront Naturalization Initiative. Marie Curtis Park is a 25.4 hectare waterfront picnic park situated on both banks along the mouth of Etobicoke Creek consisting of a three hectare mature woodlot owned by the Ontario Clean Water Association. The parkland was created in 1954 after the high flood waters caused by Hurricane Hazel devastated a number of low -lying properties. With the recent acquisition of the Arsenal Lands property by the government of Canada, it has created a sizeable parkland area. The Toronto Waterfront Naturalization Initiative (TWNI) is a community -based project with the goal to create fish and wildlife habitat across Toronto's waterfront. The project will implement strategies designed to restore a more naturalized environment to Toronto's waterfront parks and trail systems with funding and support from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the City of Toronto, local schools, businesses and interest groups. Riparian planting along 300m of the creek created a shady environment for maintaining cool water temperatures in the summer months, habitat and hiding grounds for small fish, and the reduction of erosion impacts of current and surface runoff. Headwaters Naturalization Program - Armstrong Bros. Farm In October 2001, the Armstrong Bros. Horse Farm, northeast of Hwy. #10 and King Road in Caledon invited the Caledon Mountain Girl Guides and Pathfinders to a headwaters planting event. The guides planted a tributary of the Etobicoke Creek with native trees and shrubs and installed bird boxes. The planting site can be seen from the road (on the eastern side of Hwy. #10). Heart Lake Conservation Area Eastern Shoreline Naturalization TRCA along with community partners and volunteers, began the shoreline restoration in summer 2000 by opening the gabion- baskets of a 10 metre section closest to the swimming 1,01 LI c November 28/02 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 H65 area. The area was regraded to create a more natural shoreline slope, and structural features such as large boulders, snags and stumps with roots were added. Native riparian and wetland plants, a gravel spawning shoal and a log crib for underwater bass structure were later added. The project gained attention and next year the whole eastern shoreline, approximately 100 metres, was converted from gabion to natural. During the 2002 Peel Childrens Water Festival, 1500 emergent bulrushes were planted for water quality, 200 kg of native perennial grass seed was spread for erosion, and over 500 lily pads planted by the 5000 children in attendance. The shoreline will now be monitored and small additions of plant materials may be made to increase biodiversity and shoreline stability in the future. The project may be used as a model and repeated throughout the watersheds. RES. #H27/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: WORKING GROUP COMMITTEE REPORTS The minutes of the meetings for the followingt working groups are provided for information. Steve Rutherford Chris Barnett THAT the following minutes be received: • Meeting #1/02 of the Education and Heritage Working Group; • Meeting #1/02 of the Natural Habitats Working Group; • Meeting #1/02 of the Sustainable Communities and Securement Working Group; • Meeting #1/02 of the Water Management Working Group CARRIED NEW BUSINESS SPECIALIST, ETOBICOKE MIMICO WATERSHEDS Members were advised that Beth Williston is now officially on maternity leave for one year. Beth recently welcomed her third child, Nicole, into the family. ACTING SPECIALIST, ETOBICOKE MIMICO WATERSHEDS Members were advised that Gary Wilkins has assumed the position of Acting Specialist, Etobicoke Mimico Watersheds. Gary is also currently the Humber Watershed Specialist and can be reached at (416)661 -6600, extension 5211. H66 ETOBICOKE - MIMICO WATERSHEDS COALITION #2/02 November 28/02 PROJECT MANAGER, ETOBICOKE MIMICO WATERSHED Members were advised that Kristin Geater has recently been hired as the Project Manager for the Etobicoke Mimico Watershed. Kristin can be reached at (416)661 -6600, extension 5667. GREENING OUR WATERSHEDS PRESENTATIONS Coalition members are encouraged to attend community meetings on behalf of the Coalition and provide presentations about the strategy document Greening Our Watersheds. There is a presentation available to members, in Power Point, slide and overhead formats, complete with speaking notes. If you are interested in presenting, please contact either Kristin Geater at (416)661 -6600, ext. 5667, or Paul Willms, at ext. 5316. EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH David Switzer attended the Youth Forum: Learning for a Sustainable Future on November 26`h on behalf of the Coalition, and met with teachers from the Etobicoke watershed who are interested in participating in the development and implementation of a community action site. Sean Stuart presented his work with the Coalition to students at Sir Sanford Fleming College, and has initiated discussions with professors about working with students to develop relevant projects within our watersheds. Further information will be available about this in the fall of 2003. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:20 p.m., November 28, 2002. Brian Denney J. Craig Mather Director, Watershed Management Secretary- Treasurer /L. w n 1,3 0 c THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MINUTES OF THE HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 Page G1 January 15, 2002 The Humber Watershed Alliance met in the South Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Tuesday, January 15, 2002. The Chair called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m. PRESENT Sandy Agnew Alternate Ron Allan Member Mary Louise Ashbourne Member Harry Baker Member lain Craig Member Dianne Douglas Member Yvette Fournier Member Janie Frank Alternate Lois Griffin Member Suzan Hall Member Alyson Hazlett Member John Heddle Member Ron Hingston Member David Hutcheon Member Luciano Martin Member Glenn Mason Member Madeleine McDowell Member Joan Miles Alternate Hugh Mitchell Member Arthur Mittermaier Member Marjorie Mossman Member Joanne Nonnekes Member Rick Palmer Member Lynda Rogers Member Deb Schulte Member Lynn Short Member Nancy Stewart Member Anyika Tafari Member Jane Underhill Member Michael White Member Bill Wilson Member Andrew Wilton Alternate G2 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 January 15, 2002 GUESTS Michael D'Andrea City of Toronto Gerald Foley Seneca College Anthony Ketchum TRCA/Foundation Member STAFF Vince D'Elia Clean the Humber Coordinator Don Haley Coordinator, Floodplain Management Lia Lappano Administrative Assistant, Humber Connie Pinto Water Resource Planner Chandra Sharma Humber Projects Coordinator Gary Wilkins Humber Watershed Specialist RES. #G1 /02 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Madeleine McDowell Mary Louise Ashbourne THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/01, held on October 16, 2001, be approved .... CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST S. Agnew, representing the Black Creek Project, declared a conflict of interest in agenda item 7.10, Black Creek Project Water Quality and Quantity Funding Proposal. If the proposal is approved, funding will support the salary of Mr. Agnew. CORRESPONDENCE (a) Letter from David Tilson, MPP, Dufferin -Peel- Wellington -Grey, dated December 4, 2001 re: Provincial Policy Statement (b) Letter from H. Truttenbach, Chair of the Caledon East CAS to H. Muntz of the Town of Caledon, dated October 25, 2001, re: Stormwater runoff at Airport Road and Centreville Creek (c) Certificate awarded to the Lower Humber /Black Creek Watersheds Committee for Outstanding Service and Contribution as Volunteers (d) Certificate awarded to the Humber Watershed Alliance for Outstanding Service and Contribution as Volunteers 1dl 23 Z January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G3 RES. #G2/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Madeleine McDowell Marjorie Mossman THAT the above -noted correspondence be received CARRIED PRESENTATIONS (a) Wet Weather Flow Management Plan Michael D'Andrea of the City of Toronto made a presentation on the Wet Weather Flow Management Plan. He highlighted the following: • background • previous initiatives • master planning process • goal and objectives • philosophy • public education • plan development phases The Chair thanked Mr. D'Andrea for his informative presentation. RES. #G3/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: WATER SOURCE PROTECTION INITIATIVES Urging municipalities to establish identifiable and permanent funding for water source protection initiatives. Bill Wilson Luciano Martin THAT the Regions of Peel and York and the City of Toronto be congratulated for recognizing the need for water source protection and their allocation of funding to TRCA for monitoring, groundwater management, habitat regeneration, and other watershed management activities; THAT a letter be sent by the Chair of the Humber Watershed Alliance encouraging the municipalities within the Humber watershed and the Province to establish funding mechanisms and allocate adequate Tong -term funding and consumer awareness programs; AND FURTHER THAT this report be forwarded to other TRCA Watershed Councils, Task Forces and Coalitions with a request that they also encourage the Province and municipalities to establish mechanisms to support adequate long term funding for water source protection programs and consumer awareness programs. Wnti33 G4 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 January 15, 2002 AMENDMENT RES. #4/02 Moved by: Bill Wilson Seconded by: Luciano Martin THAT the Regions of Peel and York and the City of Toronto be congratulated for recognizing the need for water source protection and their allocation of funding to TRCA for monitoring, groundwater management, habitat regeneration, and other watershed management activities; THAT a letter be sent by the Chair of the Humber Watershed Alliance encouraging the municipalities within the Humber watershed and the Province to establish funding mechanisms, allocate identifiable, adequate and permanent budgets for water source protection and consumer awareness programs, and use water rate revenues for the identification and protection of water source areas as well as building and maintaining water infrastructure; AND FURTHER THAT this report be forwarded to municipalities, other TRCA Watershed Councils, Task Forces and Coalitions with a request that they also encourage the Province and municipalities to establish mechanisms to support adequate long term funding for water source protection programs and consumer awareness programs. THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND On November 5, 2001, the Humber Alliance Report Card Working Group met to determine membership task priorities. One priority action was playing an advocacy role for funding for several major water research and monitoring tasks related to the Report Card targets. In the meantime, we have seen that the Province's Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan calls for more hydrogeologic studies which will have extraordinary costs for municipalities. The question is: "Where are the funds for all this water research and management ?" The general public, with all the benefits of an affluent society, and despite all the rhetoric, undervalues clean water. This is partly because water rates are very low and partly because existing water source protection costs are buried in municipal property tax levies. Recent tragedies, such as Walkerton, are now making the true value of clean water clearer to the public. From the proceedings of the expert panel discussions at the Walkerton Inquiry, it was concluded that water source protection programs, including long term planning, are integral parts of water supply management and must be carried out on a watershed basis and should be adequately funded as such by user pay and polluter pay sources. There is, therefore, a noticeable shift happening now which favours rationalizing, and making more visible, the needed costs of clean water. Lei I-3 Et January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G5 Water rates have traditionally only funded the construction of the physical infrastructure to convey water and waste to and from our communities. As we know, the cost of clean water is about more than just the pipes. The remainder of the needed cost is for protection of the rest of the water cycle or our "green infrastructure ". We can call this "water source protection ". The Regions of Peel and York and the City of Toronto have been providing funding to TRCA over the last three years to water source protection initiatives. In 2001, Peel, York and Toronto contributed $675,000, $500,000 and $950,000, respectively. Some of this funding went to a joint York -Peel- Durham groundwater management strategy. We are optimistic that additional funding will be provided in 2002 to complete the groundwater management strategy and its implementation. This work is critical to groundwater protection and will help address many water source management issues. The Province also provided funding in 2001 for municipal and Conservation Authority groundwater studies. Specifically, this funding was for York and Peel wellhead protection, source protection, and aquifer vulnerability mapping for the York -Peel- Durham and Conservation Authority studies. Several of the components of this work include data management, mapping and watershed based groundwater models. The above - mentioned work will also assist the municipalities in preparing water conservation plans within the next five years as required by the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. You can summarize the rationale for a separate water source protection fund as follows: • • • physical water infrastructure and water source protection are equally important; water source protection is in need of greater attention and accountability; making visible the true cost of water will help to inform the public of water's true value. What is "Water Source Protection "? Water source protection can include many programs and activities such as: regional environmental sciences studies to establish the value and functions of woodlands and aquatic habitats; • integrated watershed planning strategies to establish priorities for clean -up of the most degraded subwatersheds; • acquisition of natural heritage lands; • identification of well head protection lands; • identification of core groundwater recharge areas; • natural heritage regeneration; • ongoing environmental science education programs such as could be offered at the Albion Hills Conservation Education Centre. • confirmation and identification of enduring monitoring protocols and indicators; • monitoring, data analysis and reporting of the quality of our rivers, streams, and groundwater. We can see from the above that these activities are not just about water, but about the protection of the entire ecosystem of our natural heritage. G6 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 January 15, 2002 Several of the monitoring - related activities were identified in The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority report of September, 2000 titled, "Development of a Regional Watershed Monitoring Network ". This report suggests water and sewer rates as one of the potential major sources of funding for this "network ". What is needed is a visible, permanent and separate fund from water rates for water source protection. This would first involve dedicating part of water rate revenues to water source protection. This could also include advocating the increase of water rates to cover water source protection depending on the particular situations in the subwatershed and municipality in question. One concern that has been raised with respect to using water rates as a revenue source for water source protection is that many rural residents in the GTA, particularly the headwaters, use groundwater and do not pay water rates. As we can also see from the above list of needed activities, water source protection will contribute significantly to ensuring a permanent countryside which is the main aim of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan and which so many of the groundwater- dependent people supported. There is, therefore, a question of how to have private well households contribute to the solution of water source protection. Two options may be a tax levy or a hydro surcharge to rural households, based on the energy consumption of the well pump. Given the need for uniformity and consistency across watersheds and municipalities within and outside the TRCA jurisdiction, a strong provincial coordinating and funding role must be present. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • • Advocate to the municipalities in the Humber watershed and the Province, the need for identifiable and permanent water source protection funding. Advocate to the municipalities the use of water rate revenues for identification and protection of water source areas as well as building and maintaining water infrastructure. This is already being done by Peel and York Regions. January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G7 RES. #G5/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: TERRESTRIAL MONITORING NETWORK Establishing a terrestrial monitoring network and recruiting volunteers to inventory sites. Deb Schulte Lynn Short THAT Hugh Mitchell, Rob and Janie Frank, Joan Miles, Alyson Hazlett, Luciano Martin, Lynda Rogers, Lynn Short, Bill Wilson, Joanne Nonnekes, Anyika Tafari, Marjorie Mossman, and Mary Louise Ashbourne participate in the terrestrial monitoring network by attending the necessary skills training sessions and subsequent field work CARRIED BACKGROUND The Terrestrial Monitoring Network began in 2000 when The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and our municipal partners agreed to formalize the Tong -term, regular evaluation and reporting of environmental health in our jurisdiction. The conditions of water quality and quantity, aquatic habitats and species, and terrestrial (land) habitat and species will all be reported as a service to the people of the Toronto region. The terrestrial component will involve conducting inventories of plants and animals on 63 sample sites on both public and private lands evenly distributed throughout our jurisdiction. 22 of the sample locations are in the Humber watershed. Volunteers will conduct these inventories. Each site measures 10 hectares, and many straddle more than one property. Landowners will be asked to agree to have a site (or part of a site) located on their land and will be asked to allow a trained volunteer to conduct surveys. They would not be asked to change their normal activities or use of the sample site. You can participate as the volunteer observer who conducts the surveys. It is a year -round opportunity to develop naturalist skills, to belong to a group of dedicated volunteers and interesting people, and to contribute in a meaningful way to the health of this region. We are encouraging a long -term rapport between landowners and volunteers, so that both parties become familiar and know what to expect of each other. Respect for landowners is of the utmost importance. The exact location of the sites will not be revealed in our reports. Only a large dot will mark the general location. Our intent is not to report on the exact sites themselves, but rather to use the sites as a sample of the broader region, and to show general trends of regional health over time. No public attention or changes to regulations will occur as a result of the inventory or what information it provides. The site inventories will focus on 50 pre - selected species of plants and animals found in forests, wetlands and meadows. These "indicator" species have a wide range of adaptability and sensitivity and will tell us much about where each site lies along the gradient of ecosystem health. Together, the sites will be used to report on the health of our TRCA jurisdiction, or at slightly smaller scales such as municipalities and watersheds. The information will be used in future Humber report cards and shared with other partners. Wrlti1 1 G8 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 January 15, 2002 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Complete the volunteer monitoring training kit; • Recruit volunteers; • Train volunteers on the inventory methodology and identification of plants and animals. RES. #G6/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: SNOW DISPOSAL FEASIBILITY STUDY - CITY OF TORONTO Providing comments to the City of Toronto on their Snow Disposal Feasibility Study. Suzan Hall Sandy Agnew THAT the draft (executive summary) report on the City of Toronto's Snow Disposal Feasibility Study, be received for comments; THAT members of the Lower Humber /Black Creek Subcommittee be encouraged to attend the final public meeting, on behalf of the Humber Watershed Alliance, on January 16, 2002 in Room 313, 3rd Floor at Metro Hall; AND FURTHER THAT staff compile comments provided by the Humber Watershed Alliance on the Snow Disposal Feasibility Study and forward them to the City of Toronto CARRIED BACKGROUND The January 1999 snow storm was the worst on record with an accumulation of over 113 cm of snow. At the peak of the snow removal operation, the City had activated 18 snow disposal sites which included sites previously closed and those donated for use by private land owners, operated a sewer dumping location, and deployed five mobile melters. Given the challenges faced in 1999, the City identified the need to establish designated areas as snow disposal sites to meet any future needs should they arise and to examine alternative snow removal technologies. Consideration is being given to the establishment of large sites designated as snow disposal sites with a disposal capacity of 150,000 loads of snow over a two week interval. The following criteria has been used to consider new sites: • • one hectare minimum site size plus a 40 metre buffer= 2 hectare site • 50 metre setback from any watercourse • 350 metre setback from any residential areas to avoid noise complaints • environmental i.e. proximity to watercourses, drainage, soil, noise, and natural environment degradation. • stakeholder concerns • capacity, access, overhead restrictions, vehicle manoeuvrability • availability and securement issues • proximity to the downtown core • proximity to residential areas • operating, maintaining, cleanup, ongoing monitoring of the site January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G9 • cost benefit analysis of the snow disposal system Public input on current disposal sites was obtained through a series of public meetings held in August, October and November. The consultant has completed their review of the existing sites, both primary and emergency sites, and has presented the findings in the form of a draft report. In addition to identifying appropriate snow disposal sites, it is also recommended that a Best Available Technology (BAT) approach should be used for treating the discharge from all primary sites prior to discharge into receiving body and for sites that discharge into storm sewer systems, site specific studies should be undertaken in cooperation with the City's Wet Weather Flow Studies to determine mitigation methods. The fourth, and final public meeting on this study will be held on Wednesday, January 16, 2002, in Room 313, 3rd Floor at Metro Hall, 55 John Street from 7 -9 p.m. Public input on the Draft Snow Disposal Feasibility Study will be sought at this meeting. Within the Humber River Watershed in the City of Toronto, only one primary site has been identified for future use. This site (North Keelesdale) is located within the floodplain in the Black Creek Subwatershed. One emergency site has also been identified at Albion and Weston Rd. within the Humber Watershed. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • • Obtain comments from the Humber Watershed Alliance members. Send comments to the City of Toronto by the requested date. Attend the public meeting on January l6`h , 2002 for further information. RES. #G7/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: CLEAN THE HUMBER PROGRAM To update the Humber Watershed Alliance on the status of the Clean the Humber Program. Glenn Mason Deb Schulte THAT the staff report on the progress of the "Clean the Humber" program, be received. AND FURTHER THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance members assist in establishing a project advisory committee to develop a project work plan for the new "Humber Watershed Stream Watch" program CARRIED G10 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 January 15, 2002 BACKGROUND In May of 2000, The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, in partnership with the Humber Watershed Alliance, initiated the "Clean the Humber" program with funding support from EcoAction, Environment Canada's community funding program. The "Clean the Humber" program was implemented in an effort to improve the quality of the water through debris removal, provide valuable information for the Humber Report Card, and educate the community about the benefits of a healthy watershed. Specifically, the "Clean the Humber" program acted on the recommendations for action in the Humber Report Card, including: • The Humber Watershed Alliance works with municipalities to develop a watershed -wide clean-up event every spring, including more clean -up activities in rural areas. • Residents and businesses take part in regular watershed clean -up programs. • Public and private sectors help to provide education and awareness programs about taking responsibility for the condition of the watershed Another indicator of the health of the Humber River watershed is the level of community stewardship. The "Clean the Humber" program addressed the recommended actions, including: • Community groups, supported by public and private funding, recruit volunteers, conduct outreach, and plan and implement stewardship projects. • TRCA maintain a database of stewardship projects. Priority Sites Five priority locations were selected within the subwatersheds of the Humber River for the "Clean the Humber" program. These priority clean -up stations are located within medium to heavily populated areas of the watershed. They are: 1. East Humber subwatershed - Reach from Lake Wilcox to Bathurst Street Town of Richmond Hill; 2. Main Humber subwatershed - Reach from Old King Road to Glasgow Road Village of Bolton, Town of Caledon; 3. West Humber subwatershed - Reach from Albion Road to Martin Grove Rexdale, City of Toronto; 4. Lower Humber subwatershed - Reach from Eglinton Avenue to St. Phillips Road Village of Weston, City of Toronto; 5. Lower Humber subwatershed - Reach from The Queensway to Bloor Street Etobicoke, City of Toronto. Program Accomplishments The "Clean the Humber" project began on May 1st, 2000, and was completed on November 31St, 2001. The "Clean the Humber" program was designed to encourage participation from the surrounding community, and use their support to improve habitat and aesthetics throughout the Humber River watershed. Since its inception, in May of 2000, the program received overwhelming interest and cooperation from local residents, schools, and community action groups. The project held 39 large clean -up events (in addition to these large events, smaller scaled clean -up events were also conducted at various sites with smaller groups of volunteers). Wn-1)-{a January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G11 These events generated a tremendous amount of volunteer support, with the number of volunteers participating in each event ranging from 25 to 180. These events were scattered throughout the entire Humber watershed from the headwaters to its confluence with Lake Ontario, and focussed on both sensitive areas and high traffic areas. In addition to these events, the project coordinator, with the assistance of one to five volunteers also participated in several smaller scale clean -up activities. Prior to conducting any of these clean -up /tree planting events, students and /or volunteers were provided with educational information pertaining to the significance of the event, and were provided with the necessary information regarding safety issues related to the clean -up activities. During these events, recyclable materials such as tires (132 tires were collected), shopping carts (56 shopping carts were collected) and household recyclables was separated from other waste and transported to the appropriate recycling centres. The planting of native trees and shrubs were incorporated into some of the events in an effort to create natural buffers which could collect and prevent garbage from entering the river system and discourage public access in various sections. Signs have been erected at the various clean -up sites, educating and informing local residents about the clean -up program. FINANCIAL DETAILS The "Clean the Humber" program received funding support from Environment Canada's community funding program EcoAction and The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. EcoAction contributed $35,000 and the TRCA contributed $12,075 towards the program. This money was used to pay for staff, truck rental, boat rental, fuel, live plant material, and the necessary clean -up materials. In addition to this funding, the program received in -kind support from Humber Alliance members, the City of Toronto, community groups, schools and residents valued at over $100,000 . DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE A final report will be prepared and submitted to EcoAction 2000. In response to the overwhelming interest generated by the "Clean the Humber" program, and the need for community stewardship and education regarding garbage problem in the watershed, a follow -up program is currently being designed. The new "Humber Watershed Stream Watch" program will be initiated in the year 2002. To develop this new program, the following steps will be taken: • develop a project proposal based on the outcomes (needs and requirements) of the "Clean the Humber" program. This new program will incorporate. This new program will incorporate objectives of the Regional Watershed monitoring program and the Visual Aesthetics monitoring program; • seek out and confirm in -kind and other funding contributions; • establish a project advisory committee including members of the Humber Watershed Alliance and other partner agencies to develop a project plan; • prepare implementation details. G12 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 January 15, 2002 RES. #G8/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: OAK RIDGES MORAINE CONSERVATION PLAN Receipt of the Humber Watershed Alliance's comments on the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. Madeleine McDowell lain Craig THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance's comments on the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, dated December 4, 2001, be received. AMENDMENT RES. #9102 Moved by: Seconded by: Jane Underhill lain Craig THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance's comments on the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, dated December 4, 2001, be received; THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance support the motion adopted by the Township of King Council on December 11, 2001 which states, in part, that large wastewater infrastructure such as the York Durham Sewer System and the Bolton Brampton Trunk Sewer (Peel) not be allowed to extend further on the Oak Ridges Moraine and that local treatment plants for settlement areas be considered; THAT King City be identified as an "existing Rural Settlement" on the Oak Ridges Moraine Plan, consistent with its "Towns and Villages" designation in the York Regional Official Plan and pursuant to Official Plan Amendment No. 54; AND FURTHER THAT the Province of Ontario be so advised, in writing, by the Chair of the Humber Watershed Alliance. THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND The Oak Ridges Moraine Working Group met on November 30, 2001 to provide input to the draft Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. Comments were compiled and submitted to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing on December 4, 2001, on behalf of the Humber Watershed Alliance. IA) r1tig2 January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G13 RES. #G10/02 - HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE WORK PLAN Development of a work plan for the Humber Watershed Alliance. Moved by: Seconded by: Madeleine McDowell Marjorie Mossman THAT the priority list of actions, as outlined in the Draft Humber Alliance Work Plan, be received; THAT the subcommittees and working groups finalize their priority action list and work with TRCA staff to develop a work plan to guide the work of the Humber Watershed Alliance; AND FURTHER THAT the work plan be brought back to the Humber Watershed Alliance for approval at the next meeting CARRIED BACKGROUND The Humber Watershed Alliance Terms of Reference requires that the Alliance prepare annual work plans and that these work plans be approved by the Authority. The Report Card Working Group met and reviewed the list of 28 indicators in the Humber Report Card. Those indicators considered of highest priority were identified. The Report Card Working Group identified actions that could be addressed by the Humber Alliance and these actions were combined into the following categories: • • • • • Advocacy; Data Collection (monitoring); Stewardship (habitat improvement, planting); Fundraising; Outreach Education (awareness); Business Outreach; Events; Promotion (displays, flyers); Trails. The Humber Watershed Alliance has three subwatershed committees, and three working groups. Each of the subwatershed committees and working groups has developed a draft list of priority actions for their term. The information from these priority action lists will be consolidated into a work plan for the Humber Watershed Alliance. In designing the priority list of actions, each subcommittee's goal is to undertake actions that will help achieve the objectives of Legacy: A Strategy for a Hea /thy Humber. G14 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 January 15, 2002 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • a priority actions list from each subwatershed committee and the working groups will be consolidated into the Alliance work plan. • Subwatershed, technical, and working group subcommittee members will work collectively to implement the actions listed in the work plan. • Funding from external sources will be sought by the relevant committee members for many of their projects. • TRCA staff resources will assist the subcommittees and working groups in implementing work plan actions. RES. #G11/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: NATURALIZATION AND RELOCATION OF THE BLACK CREEK CHANNEL AT LAMBTON GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB - CITY OF TORONTO Update on the naturalization and relocation of the Black Creek Channel at the Lambton Golf and Country Club. Sandy Agnew Luciano Martin THAT the staff report on the naturalization and relocation of the Black Creek Channel at Lambton Golf and Country Club, in the City of Toronto, be received; THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance support the option of providing stormwater management ponds and other lot level controls as part of the Black Creek Channel naturalization project at the Lambton Golf and Country Club property, to improve water quality; AND FURTHER THAT the public be consulted further during Phase 3 of the feasibility study and incorporate their comments and suggestions, where appropriate, into the selection of the preferred option CARRIED BACKGROUND The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority along with the City of Toronto is carrying out a Preliminary Engineering Study related to the removal and renaturalization of a section of concrete channel through the Lambton Golf Club (from Scarlett Road to the Humber River). The study also includes a review of potential opportunities for providing some improvement to water quality from the Black Creek. This study is being undertaken with funding from the City of Toronto, the TRCA and from the Lambton Golf and Country Club. Representatives from the golf course initiated discussions with the City and the Authority to look at the feasibility of removing the concrete lining along the watercourse through their lands to improve the aesthetics of the watercourse and the golf course. At the same time, the golf course is faced with changes in provincial regulations regarding their water taking permit, which will reduce the golf club's ability to draw water directly from the Humber River under low flow conditions. As a result, it will become necessary for the golf club to develop alternative arrangements for irrigation including some form of surface storage. 1012)411 January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G15 The City and Authority's objectives of this project are to renaturalize the watercourse, restore aquatic habitat and to provide water quality treatment. These are priority objectives identified in Legacy: A Strategy fora Healthy Humber, and are consistent with Lambton's objectives and therefore, the preliminary study was initiated in 2000. The study being undertaken has been broken down into three phases. The initial phase reviewed the feasibility of the project in general based upon the needs of all parties. A primary objective of any naturalization option, however, would be to maintain the flood control function of the channel. If the land requirements for the new, naturalized channel, which may triple in size, cannot be accommodated by the club, the study was to be terminated. Following review of the Phase One feasibility study, the golf club agreed to continue with the study after acknowledging the impacts of the wider channel through its lands. Phase Two of the study was initiated to review alternatives to the potential project components. It was these alternatives which were presented at the November 9, 2001 public meeting to obtain feedback from the community and identify issues and /or concerns that exist related to the project. It was very evident from the meeting that the alternatives presented for a storage /water quality pond on lands behind 240 Scarlett Road were of great concern to the residents. The concerns expressed by the residents have been noted, and as part of the Phase Two study, will be documented and attempts will be made to address these concerns. Concerns related to the stormwater pond include reduced property values, odour, aesthetics and safety. As follow up in this regard, the Study Team met shortly after the public meeting to discuss the residents' concerns and identify other options and activities that should be undertaken to respond to the concerns expressed. In addition, a tour of the stormwater ponds was held on December 2, 2001 to give the residents a better understanding of the types of facilities and restoration which have been integrated into similar facilities. This tour was in response to comments received at the public meeting and a desire by some to visit stormwater sites to discuss a number of concerns that residents had. The second phase of the study will be completed by year end and we hope to initiate the third and final phase of the Preliminary Engineering Study early next year. Phase Three will further refine the preferred option and will include another public meeting to allow residents to assess how their comments have been integrated into the project and to provide additional opportunity for comments and suggestions related to this project. G16 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 January 15, 2002 RES. #G12/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: WALKERTON INQUIRY TOWN HALL MEETING Receipt of a copy of the presentation titled, "The Role of the Public in Watershed Management ", made to the Walkerton Inquiry Town Hall meeting on October 29, 2001. Mary Louise Ashbourne Alyson Hazlett THAT a copy of the presentation titled, "The Role of the Public in Watershed Management ", made to the Walkerton Inquiry Town Hall Meeting on October 29, 2001, be received CARRIED BACKGROUND The Humber Watershed Alliance, at its meeting #1/01, adopted the following resolution: "THAT the TRCA watershed Task Forces, Regeneration Councils and Alliances support the Conservation Ontario paper entitled, "The importance of Watershed Management in Protecting Ontario's Drinking Water Supplies': THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance, along with the other Task Forces and Regeneration Councils, develop a joint presentation based on the submission by Conservation Ontario. The joint submission will be presented at a Town Hall Meeting during summer 2001 for the Walkerton inquiry to address specific issues in the Greater Toronto Area that otherw /se may not be addressed by the inquiry. THAT Derek Doyle, Leo Luong, and Bill Wilson participate in this initiative and assist in developing the joint submission. AND FURTHER THAT the joint submission be provided to all TRCA watershed Task Forces, Regeneration Councils, and Alliances, municipal councils, and The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority" Subsequent to this, several meetings were held at TRCA Offices with representatives from the various task forces and councils to provide input to the report which Deborah Martin -Downs of the Don Regeneration Council, presented to the Town Hall meeting on October 29, 2001. RES. #G13/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: DESIGNATION OF ROAD SALT AS A TOXIC SUBSTANCE A joint submission to support the designation of road salt as a toxic substance under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) 1999. Madeleine McDowell Deb Schulte THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance support the Environment Minister's recommendation to place road salt as a toxic substance under the CEPA Priority Substance List; January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G17 THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance submit a letter to the Federal Minister of the Environment, with copies sent to the Minister of Health, Minister of Public Works, Minister of Transport, the Hon. Charles Caccia of the Commons Environment Committee, and all watershed MPs, supporting the addition of inorganic chloride salts with or without ferrocyanide salts to Schedule 1 under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA); THAT other TRCA watershed Task Forces, Regeneration Councils and Coalitions be requested to also support the Environment Minister's recommendation to identify road salt as a toxic substance under the CEPA Priority Substance List and the addition of inorganic chloride salts with or without ferrocyanide salts to Schedule 1 under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA); THAT TRCA staff be directed to prepare comments on the designation of road salt as a toxic substance by the requested date; AND FURTHER THAT the MTO, 407 ETR and local and regional municipalities continue their efforts to reduce the amount of salt that is being applied in TRCA watersheds CARRIED BACKGROUND Road salts were put on the priority substance list (PSL) under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) for an environmental assessment in 1995 because of concerns about the large quantities used in Canada and the potential effects of chlorides on the environment. Substances that are on the PSL are a priority for assessment. Their presence on the PSL does not restrict any activity relating to the substance. Following the assessment, if it is determined that a substance is indeed harmful to the environment, then it can be added to Schedule 1 of CEPA 1999- and is considered for development of management and control actions . As a result, Environment Canada conducted a comprehensive science assessment under CEPA. The assessment is posted on Environment Canada's website (www.ec .gc.ca/substances /ese /eng /psap /final /roadsalts.cfm).The five year science assessment determined the release of road salts into the environment in very high amounts leads to environmental problems. The assessment concluded: "Based on the available data, it is considered that road salts that contain inorganic chloride salts with or without ferrocyanide salts are entering the environment in a quantity or concentrat /on or under conditions that have or may have an immediate or long -term harmful effect on the environment or its biological diversity or that constitute or may constitute a danger to the env /ronment on which life depends. Therefore, it is concluded that road salts that contain inorganic chloride salts with or without ferrocyan /de salts are "toxic" as defined In section 64 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act,1999 (CEPA 1999)." On December 1st, 2001, Environment Canada announced its intention to add road salt to Schedule 1 under the new Canad /an Environmental Protection Actso that management options to reduce their impact on the environment could be developed. This begins a 60 -day commenting period ending January 29, 2002 in which the public is encouraged to comment on this recommendation. wr1IV 7 G18 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 January 15, 2002 Comments received during this period will determine whether or not the Minister will follow through with his decision to add road salts to Schedule 1 of CEPA 1999 and whether regulations, guidelines and management options are developed to significantly reduce the quantity of road salts discharged to the environment. Under CEPA, the government has two years to develop management measures to reduce the impact of road salts on the environment. This may include improved application technologies, and better storage and handling techniques. These measures will be selected and developed with input from various stakeholders later this year.The proposed risk management regime will be presented to the government for a further 60 -day consultation period. Following approval, the government has a further 18 months to finalize the measures. Comments to support adding of inorganic chloride salts with or without ferrocyanide salts to Schedule 1 under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) can be sent to the Director, Existing Substances Branch, Environmental Protection Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A OH3, by fax: (819) 953 -4936 or e-mail: PSL.LSIP @ec.gc.ca. RATIONALE The first Report Card on the Health of the Humber Watershed identifies that Chloride levels (based on Provincial Water Quality Objectives) have been rising across the watershed over the last 30 years, except for Black Creek where they are already high. The levels may be toxic to aquatic life in Black Creek and the Lower Humber during winter. Moreover, five years of thorough scientific study by Environment Canada has also concluded that road salt is a toxic substance. The recent opposition to the designation of road salt as toxic substance by the salt institute as well as the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) presents a real challenge in convincing the federal cabinet that the designation is essential to ensure proper management of road salts by the provinces and municipalities. To ensure that the matter is supported when it is brought forward to the attention of Cabinet for approval, it is essential that the importance of protecting water quality in the GTA watersheds is demonstrated to area MP's and other members of the Cabinet. RES. #G14/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: BLACK CREEK PROJECT WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY FUNDING PROPOSAL Funding proposal to address the water quality and quantity problems in the Black Creek subwatershed. Janie Frank Ron Allan wrl z)+8 January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G19 THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance provide a letter supporting the principles and actions of the funding proposal; AND FURTHER THAT staff report on the progress of the project should funding become available CARRIED BACKGROUND In 1982, Friends of Black Creek recognized the degradation to the creek being caused by current development practices and formed the Black Creek Project (BCP) to try to mitigate the degradation. The BCP was incorporated as a non - profit group in 1985 and received charitable status in 1995. Over the years the BCP has planted thousands of trees, cleaned tonnes of garbage from the creek, created wetlands, lobbied for better stormwater treatment and worked with thousands of students and volunteers. In spite of these efforts the creek remains severely degraded in water quality, water quantity (flow) and wildlife habitat. The Humber Watershed Task Force's report A Call To Action referred to the Black Creek subwatershed as "the most degraded of all the Humber subwatersheds ". The general objectives of this proposal are to reduce contaminant loadings to Black Creek and to work toward the restoration a more natural flow regime in the creek. By doing so the project will work toward fulfilment of the following Humber Alliance objectives as listed in A Call To Action: Objective 5: Objective 8: Objective 9: Objective 10: Objective 12: Objective 26: Manage stormwater to protect people and the health of streams and rivers. Reduce the amount of nutrients and bacteria that enter ground and surface waters. Reduce the amount of pesticides, chemical fertilizers, oil, grease, metals, road salt and other contaminants that enter ground and surface waters. Protect ground and surface waters from spills and illegal discharges of hazardous materials. Protect and regenerate aquatic habitats. Cultivate partnerships between individuals, community groups, businesses, and public agencies in order to implement the Humber Watershed Strategy. The Humber Alliance's Report Card on the Health of the Humber River Watershed, January, 2000 confirmed the degraded condition of Black Creek and recommended numerous actions for remediation such as: Agencies reinvest in regular water quality monitoring. MOE, TRCA and community groups carry out sampling programs for metals, organic contaminants Community groups aid in the collection of water quality information. Municipalities and TRCA encourage the reduction of stormwater runoff This proposal will implement these and other recommendations of the Report Card G20 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 January 15, 2002 PROJECT COMPONENTS This proposal initiates actions that begin to address water quantity and quality issues in the Black Creek in one project with two components. The first component deals with water quantity and consists of an outreach program to businesses. The focus will be on source control of runoff. (The Toronto Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan Steering Committee has listed source controls as the highest priority in addressing stormwater problems.) A marketing campaign will be designed and implemented to persuade larger businesses to retrofit on -site source controls of runoff such as rooftop storage, porous parking lots, grassed swales, soakaway pits, small wetlands and cisterns. Technical support will be offered to aid businesses in implementing source controls. The second component will address water quality and will develop and implement a program to monitor and sample storm sewer outfalls to the creek and work with inspection agencies to trace, identify and eliminate pollution sources. Project staff will do regular daily inspections of the creek and the outfalls and conduct rudimentary chemical tests as required. Suspected pollution sources will be reported to city inspectors. Project staff will work with city inspectors to trace pollution back to identify and eliminate its source. New construction and agricultural practices will also be inspected regularly and suspected infractions reported to authorities. Benthic invertebrates will be monitored as an indicator of water quality. Potential sites for new stormwater treatment ponds and /or wetlands will be identified as well as sources of garbage littering the creek. The BCP will work with several partners to design and implement this project such as, TRCA, cities of Toronto and Vaughan, Great Lakes Sustainability Fund, local businesses, TD Canada Trust, Great Lakes Renewal Foundation and Lake Ontario Lake Keepers. FINANCIAL DETAILS The proposal will seek funding for a period of two years. The following table outlines the draft budget for one year: DRAFT BUDGET - 12 MONTHS Partner Contribution Cash $000 In -Kind $000 Black Creek Project project delivery 5.0 Great Lakes Sustainability Fund wages, one coordinator 1 /2time, 2 staff, full time 100.0 TRCA tech support, enforcement 3.0 January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G21 Toronto tech support, enforcement, vehicle, fuel, lab test costs 27 0 Vaughan tech support, enforcement, vehicle, fuel, lab test costs 20.5 Local business office space, office equip, admin/ accounting 13.0 Great Lakes Renewal Fund outreach supplies, equipment 31.0 TD Canada Trust field test, equipment 10.0 Lake Ontario Lake Keepers tech support 3.0 Totals - 12 months 141.0 71.5 Total project draft budget for two years: $425,000 DETAILS OF WORK STILL TO BE DONE 1. Finalize partner roles and budget. 2. Seek and confirm business partner(s). 3. Complete and submit application forms for cash funders. 4. Obtain letters of confirmation from in -kind funders. RES. #G15/02 - SPRING EVENTS IN THE HUMBER WATERSHED Schedule of spring events within the Humber watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: David Hutcheon Yvette Fournier THAT the following schedule of events be received for information CARRIED BACKGROUND Each year, individuals, groups and agencies are encouraged to host and /or participate in events to celebrate watersheds. Below is a list of spring events and seminars: k) rn S / G22 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 January 15, 2002 Maple Syrup Tour Saturday March 2, 2002 Members of the Humber Watershed Alliance, Community Actions Site Committees, Subwatershed Committees, Claireville and Boyd North Management Committees, and their families, are invited to celebrate the coming of spring by joining the Humber watershed staff on a complimentary maple syrup tour and pancake lunch at Kortright Centre for Conservation. Advance reservations only. Please call Catharine Waugh 416 - 661 -6600, ext. 6283 before February 22, 2002 to reserve your space. Lambton House Hotel & Lower Humber Discovery Walk Sunday, May 5, 2002 1 - 3 pm Meet at the Lambton House at 4066 Old Dundas Street for a guided tour of the newest Discovery Walk on the Lower Humber. Lake Wilcox Fun Day Sunday, June 23, 2002 12 noon - 3 pm The 4th annual Lake Wilcox Fun Day is a celebration of all that the lake has to offer in this growing community in Richmond Hill. There will be music, nature hikes, electro fishing demonstrations, canoe rides, and other fun activities for the whole family. Canada Day at Albion Hills Conservation Area Monday, July 1, 2002 6 - 9 pm Join us for family activities including live entertainment, hay rides, pony rides, boat rentals, and a variety of food vendors. The highlight of Caledon Canada Day is always the spectacular fireworks display over Lake Albion, proudly presented by the Caledon Canada Day Committee, TRCA and the Town of Caledon. Conservation Seminar Series Earth Week Events World Wetland Day - Wood Duck Day Eaton Hall Seneca College Saturday, February 2nd, 7 - 9 pm Claireville Community Planting Claireville Conservation Area Saturday, April 13th, 10 am - 12 noon Hoot & Howl Albion Hills Field Centre Tuesday, February 5th, 7 - 9 pm Tree Advocacy Community Planting West Humber, Etobicoke April (t.b.a.), 10 am - 12 noon Stewardship Forum Kortright Centre for Conservation Saturday, February 23rd, 10 am - 5 pm Rexdale Park Community Planting Rexdale Park C.A.S. Saturday, April 20th, 10 am - 12 noon Deer Seminar Claireville Conservation Area March (t.b.a.) 7 - 9 pm Palgrave Community Tree Planting Palgrave Mill Pond Saturday, April 27th, 9 am - 2 pm Hoot & Howl Claireville Conservation Area March (t.b.a.) 7 - 9 pm Downsview Park Earth Day Planting Downsview Park date t.b.a. January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G23 Conservation Seminar Series Earth Week Events Healthy Backyards Black Creek Pioneer Village Wednesday, March 27th, 7 - 9 pm Earth Day Planting Eaton Hall Seneca College April (t.b.a.), 10 am - 12 noon Hea /thy Backyards (location t.b.a.) Tuesday, April 2nd, 7 - 9 pm Wildflowers of the Humber Walk (Humber Heritage Committee) Lambton House Sunday, April 21st, 1 pm Butten9 /es and their Gardens Albion Hills Field Centre Saturday, April 13th, 7 - 9 pm Spring Wildflower Tour Albion Hills Field Centre Wednesday, May 22nd, 7 - 9 pm Spring Wildflower Tour High Park Wednesday, May 29th, 7 - 9 pm Pond Studies Claireville Conservation Area Sunday, June 2nd, 7 - 9 pm Insectmania Lambton Woods Monday, June 24th, 7 - 9 pm lnsectmania Claireville Conservation Area Tuesday, June 25th, 7 -9 pm wh2S "3 G24 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1102 January 15, 2002 RES. #G16/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: WORKING GROUP COMMITTEE REPORTS The minutes of the meetings for the following working groups are provided for information. Marjorie Mossman Madeleine McDowell THAT the following minutes be received: • Meeting #2/01 of the Communications and Outreach Working Group; • Meeting #2/01 of the Report Card Working Group; • Joint Meetings #1/01, #2/01 and #1/02 of the East Humber Subwatershed Committee and Boyd North Stewardship Committee; • Meetings #2/01 and #3101 of Lower Humber /Black Creek Subwatershed Committee; • Joint Meeting #1/01 of the West Humber Subwatershed Committee and Claireville Stewardship Committee CARRIED NEW BUSINESS THE LAY OF THE LAND HISTORIC TALK M. McDowell advised that on Friday, January 18, 2002, a historic talk will be held at the Lambton House on the topic of the `Lay of the Land'. For additional information, members are asked to contact Madeleine McDowell directly. LOST STREAMS WALK M. McDowell invited members to a Lost Stream Walk, hosted jointly with the Toronto Field Naturalists, on Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 2 p.m., starting from the Lambton House. For additional information, members are asked to contact Madeleine McDowell directly. WILLIAMS PARKWAY PROPOSAL D. Schulte congratulated the members of the Humber Alliance on their efforts to stop the continuation of the Williams Parkway through Claireville. This is a big win for Claireville. wt-1z5`1 January 15, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #1/02 G25 WOODBRIDGE EXPANSION AREA COMMUNITY ACTION SITE D. Schulte reported that a new community action site is being established known as the Woodbridge Expansion Area CAS. It will involve wetland creation, trails, and tree plantings. The first meeting of the group will take place on January 31, 2002 at the Boyd Field Centre. Anyone wishing to participate in this community action site should contact Deb Schulte directly. INTRODUCTION G. Wilkins introduced Anthony Ketchum, a member of the Authority and the Foundation. Mr. Ketchum resides in a self - sustainable home in Adjala and has extended an invitation to any member interested in visiting his home may do so during Earth Week. DOOR PRIZE As a token of the Authority's appreciation for the members' participation on the Humber Alliance, G. Wilkins advised that a door prize will be drawn at the end of each Alliance meeting. The door prize for this meeting was a $50 gift certificate at the Authority's Nursery. A. Hazlett was asked to assist with the draw. The first winning ticket belonged to David Hutcheon who asked that another selection be made as he could not make full use of the certificate. The second winning ticket belonged to lain Craig who accepted the gift certificate. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:15 p.m., January 15, 2002. Brian Denney J. Craig Mather Director, Watershed Management Secretary- Treasurer /L. c. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MINUTES OF THE HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #2102 Page G26 April 16, 2002 The Humber Watershed Alliance met in the South Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Tuesday, April 16, 2002. In the Chair's absence, the Vice -Chair assumed the role of Chair and called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m. PRESENT Sandy Agnew Alternate Ron Allan Member Mary Louise Ashbourne Member Harry Baker Member lain Craig Member Dianne Douglas Member Yvette Fournier Member Ian Gray Member Jeff Hathaway Member Alyson Hazlett Member Ron Hingston Member Maja Jankovic Member Leo Luong Member Luciano Martin Member Glenn Mason Member Madeleine McDowell Member Joan Miles Alternate Marjorie Mossman Member Dick O'Brien Chair, TRCA Rick Palmer Member Randall Reid Member Lynda Rogers Member Deb Schulte Member Lynn Short Member Vito Spatafora Member Nancy Stewart Member Susan Swail Member Michael White Member Richard Whitehead Vice -Chair Bill Wilson Member G27 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 GUESTS James Caldwell City of Toronto, World Youth Day Secretariat Allan Crawford City of Toronto, Parks & Recreation Mary Hart Ballycroy Area Rural Conservation Alliance Anthony Ketchum TRCA/Foundation Member Tony Rothschild Rotary Club of Etobicoke Sunrise STAFF Vince D'Elia Clean the Humber Coordinator Chris Hibbert Plans Analyst Scott Jarvie Coordinator, Reg'l Watershed Monitoring Program Lia Lappano Administrative Assistant, Humber Connie Pinto Water Resource Planner Chandra Sharma Humber Projects Coordinator Gary Wilkins Humber Watershed Specialist RES. #G17/02 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Madeleine McDowell Bill Wilson THAT the Minutes of Meeting #1/02, held on January 15, 2002, be approved CARRIED DELEGATION Mary Hart, representing the Ballycroy Area Rural Conservation Alliance, speaking in regards to the proposed Ballycroy Golf /Hotel development. CORRESPONDENCE (a) Letter from Michael D. Harris, Premier of Ontario, dated March 5, 2002 to L. Griffin re: Water Source Protection (b) Letter from Michael D. Harris, Premier of Ontario, dated March 18, 2002 to W. Wilson re: Water Source Protection (c) Letter from City of Brampton, dated March 10, 2002 re: Water Source Protection April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G28 (d) Letter from City of Mississauga, dated March 4, 2002 re: Water Source Protection (e) Letter from David Anderson, Minister of the Environment, dated February 28, 2002 re: Road Salt (f) Letter from Charles Caccia, MP for Davenport, dated February 11, 2002, re: Road Salt (g) Letter from the Hon. Allan Rock, MP for Etobicoke Centre, dated March 25, 2002, re: Road Salt (h) Letter from John Hirsch, Chair of the Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force, dated January 9, 2002 re: Provincial Sustainable Water Strategy and Comprehensive Provincial Water Policy (i) Excerpt from internet re: City World Youth Day 2002 RES. #G18/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Vito Spatafora Marjorie Mossman THAT the above -noted correspondence be received CARRIED PRESENTATIONS (a) Regional Watershed Monitoring in the Humber River Scott Jarvie, Coordinator for the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program made a presentation on the Authority's work to date in the Humber River with respect to the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. (b) World Youth Day 2002 James Caldwell from the World Youth Day Secretariat, City of Toronto, made a presentation on the upcoming World Youth Day program and activities. RES. #G19/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Luciano Martin Jeff Hathaway I,)r12 5g G29 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance support the environmental activities of World Youth Day 2002; AND FURTHER THAT Randall Reid be appointed as the Humber Watershed Alliance Events Coordinator for World Youth Day 2002 to work with Mr. Caldwell of the City of Toronto CARRIED The Vice -Chair thanked Messrs. Jarvie and Caldwell for their informative presentations. RES. #G20/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: REGIONAL WATERSHED MONITORING PROGRAM Summary of 2001 monitoring activities related to the TRCA's Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. Madeleine McDowell Deb Schulte THAT the report summarizing the 2001 activities of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program be received; AND FURTHER THAT members of the Humber Watershed Alliance assist, where possible, with the implementation of the monitoring activities associated with year two of this ongoing program, as well as to continue to pursue and foster partnerships under the Regional Watershed Monitoring Network CARRIED BACKGROUND Despite budget reductions in recent years, there has been increased demand for monitoring data that can be used to measure performance and evaluate environmental health. In implementing watershed strategies through the watershed alliances and councils, the Authority has developed report cards for individual watersheds. The report cards have created a formal process for reporting on the health of individual watersheds and have increased the demand for monitoring data. Municipalities, as well, require environmental data to report on the state of the environment. Monitoring is an integral component of watershed management. Monitoring provides essential information that allows the establishment of quantitative targets for protection and rehabilitation, the evaluation of management actions, and inform management decisions. The Regional Watershed Monitoring Program is an ongoing program that has been developed by the TRCA to provide a comprehensive, integrated and coordinated approach to environmental monitoring in the Greater Toronto Area. The program will include the establishment of a Monitoring Network that will endeavour to bring together a group of like - minded, cooperative agencies and organizations to collect, store, distribute and report on environmental monitoring data that furthers the interests of all involved parties. This Monitoring Network will build on the existing local and project- specific monitoring efforts of its partners. WhZs9 April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G30 PROJECT OBJECTIVES • • • • • To develop a program that provides the necessary information to assess the health of the watersheds, subwatersheds, waterfront ecosystems, and RAP area, spatially and temporally. To identify a set of indicators that reflect ecosystem condition, integrate the monitoring requirements of the RAP with report cards for individual watersheds, and are compatible with municipal state of the environment reporting and other broad programs like SOLEC, for the Great Lakes basin, and the provincial policy performance indicators. To develop an efficient program that builds upon existing monitoring activities, avoids duplication between agencies, municipalities, and organizations, is cost effective in allocating the best use of resources and informs management decisions. To identify ways to engage and involve the public, interest, and school groups in meaningful monitoring activities. To develop and obtain agreement from stakeholders on a set of monitoring protocols for the collection, analysis, storage and distribution of data on the indicators that are identified. In 2001 the Authority initiated the year 1 implementation of the monitoring program. This program focussed on four components; Aquatic Habitat and Species, Surface Water Quality, Flow and Precipitation, and Terrestrial Natural Heritage. The monitoring activities supporting the Regional Program are implemented through the Authority and a network of partners. The network is comprised of agencies that collectively carry out environmental monitoring activities (Table 1). Table 1 - Regional Monitoring Network MONITORING COMPONENT Aquatic Habitat & Species Benthos Fish Community & Habitat Fluvial Geomorphology Algae Surface Water Quality Routine Stream Sampling Routine Waterfront Water Chemistry Tributary Toxics Monitoring Fish Biomonitoring Lake Partner Program Aesthetics Monitoring Flow & Precipitation Stream Flow Gauges Base Flow Monitoring Precipitation Gauges Snow Course Monitoring (0.12 lop AGENCY /PARTNER TRCA / MOE TRCA / MNR TRCA TRCA / City of Toronto City of Toronto /TRCA City of Toronto MOE MOE MOE TRCA TRCA TRCA TRCA / Environment Canada TRCA G31 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 Terrestrial Natural Heritage TRCA The following summarizes the monitoring activities carried out for each of the included program components during 2001: Aquatic Habitat and Species Aquatic organisms live, for the most part, their entire lives within the water. As a result, they are subjected to the many interacting physical, chemical and biological factors which surround them, and are dependent upon these factors for the maintenance of their health. Such factors include water temperature, water flow, nutrients, sediment or contaminants carried in water, channel form and types of in stream cover, to report a few. If an environment becomes degraded, often, the first clue is a change in the biotic community. The monitoring activities undertaken under the Aquatic Species and Habitat component are summarized as follows: Benthic Invertebrates were monitored at a total of 114 sites in the Humber, Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek, Don, Highland and Rouge watersheds in 2001. Samples of the invertebrate communities were obtained at each site using a modified kick and sweep netting technique. Samples were submitted to a qualified consultant for identification services and were identified to species. Based on the data collected in 2001 and future years, a variety of multi- metric and multi - variate approaches will be used to assess water quality and habitat conditions within the sample sites. Future use of the data will also include the identification of Regional Reference Sites that may be used to characterize the ecological integrity of various streams within the region. Fish species and Habitat Fishes and their community structure are often used as indicators of the health of an aquatic system for a number of reasons: 1) fish communities usually encompass all of the trophic levels present in a system from primary consumers (herbivores) to top predators (piscivores); 2) fish are generally easy to sample and identify; 3) there is a wealth of information available on their life- histories and various sensitivities to environmental degradation; 4) historical data exists regarding fish communities in many areas; 5) fishing is an important industry with economic value; 6) the general public and policy makers can relate more to fish than other aquatic organisms. In order to gain a regional understanding of fish species and habitat on a watershed basis, the monitoring program has targeted 150 sites throughout the nine watersheds within the TRCA jurisdiction. In 2001 a total of 52 of these sites (38 in the Humber and 14 in Etobicoke Creek) were monitored using the Ontario Stream Assessment Protocol. The expectation is that all of the 150 sites identified can be surveyed within a 3 year period. Fluvial Geomorphology Information on physical habitat is needed at fixed sites within each watershed in order to understand the normal variation that occurs in habitat and associated changes in the fish and benthic invertebrate community. The data is also needed to identify any long term trends in habitat that might affect stream health and productive capacity. Therefore, it has been recommended that a Tong -term monitoring program be established in partnership with wMUQI April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G32 interested agencies and organizations to track changes in physical habitat at the sites where fish and benthic invertebrate communities are surveyed. The physical component of aquatic habitat in a stream is closely related to the fluvial geomorphology. Studies of fluvial geomorphology are important components of works in and around watercourses and are often undertaken in association with these works. Previously, there have been few on -going monitoring activities associated with tracking changes in fluvial geomorphology, spatially and temporally. The importance of fluvial geomorphology in understanding the association between flow in a stream and the aquatic habitat present cannot be over stated. For this reason, it is has been recommended that several aspects of fluvial geomorphological assessments (eg. long profiles, cross sections, pebble counts, bank full width and depth etc...) be incorporated into the Regional Monitoring Program that has been developed and is currently being implemented by the TRCA. A total of 150 stations across the nine watersheds within the TRCA's jurisdiction have been targeted as part of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. For the 2001 field season a total of 50 of these stations were selected (Humber, Etobicoke Creek and Mimico Creek) and surveyed using standard fluvial geomorphology measurement techniques. The expectation is that all of the sites identified can be set -up and surveyed within a 3 year period. Algae Marianne Douglas, an Assistant Professor of Geology from the University of Toronto outlined a case for algae as biomonitors at the 1999 IJC Water Quality Board workshop (Toronto and Region RAP 1999). In her presentation she identified that algae can be excellent biomonitors for environmental assessments because they are common and widespread throughout all watersheds, they form the base of the food chain, there are hundreds of different species, and they are sensitive to environmental conditions, especially water chemistry. Algae have been successfully used to monitor such things as nutrient surplus (ie. eutrophication), turbidity and siltation, organic enrichment, high salinity, contamination by metals, and acidification. At present there are several programs throughout the world that have utilized algae monitoring. The benefit of using algae as a biomonitor is its low cost relative to other traditional methods as well as the non - destructive collection methods of algae sampling. In addition, algae are often the first group of organisms to be impacted by shifts in physical and chemical conditions in a watercourse, including the introduction of pollutants at relatively low concentrations, because of their strong connection to basic water chemistry and their short life cycles. Thus algae can be an important component of an early warning system of change in a watershed. Algae sampling was conducted during the 2001 field season at 114 sites in the Humber, Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek, Don, Highland and Rouge watersheds as well as at the stream water quality monitoring sites surveyed by the City of Toronto. These samples will provide some of the data necessary to further evaluate the use of algae as a biomonitor for the GTA watersheds. Terrestrial Natural Heritage Terrestrial natural heritage monitoring was undertaken in support of the development of TRCA's Natural Heritage Strategy. Approximately 6000 hectares of natural cover (forest, wetlands and meadow) were inventoried by staff biologists throughout the TRCA jurisdiction. G33 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 The surveys involved mapping and describing vegetation communities, and mapping flora and fauna species. To date, approximately 45% of the natural cover in the TRCA jurisdiction has been digitized. This 2001 and earlier information has been combined into a regional inventory and will be used in the development of the Natural Heritage Strategy and in subsequent stages of its implementation. Water Quality In 2001 the Authority continued to liaise and expand partnerships with our key program delivery agencies, including the City of Toronto (stream and waterfront routine water chemistry monitoring); Ministry of the Environment (Tributary Toxics Monitoring; Young -of- the -Year Biomonitoring; Sport Fish Contaminant Monitoring; Lake Partner Program); and Municipal Health Units (Bathing Beach Monitoring). In addition, a new, community based program initiated in 2001 expanded opportunities for volunteers to participate in stream monitoring activities. The following summarizes the surface water quality monitoring activities that were carried out in 2001 through these partnerships: Routine stream chemistry was tracked at 17 sites across TRCA watersheds, except the Duffins and Carruthers once per month throughout 2001. An additional 5 sites, 4 in the Duffins and one in the Carruthers, are planned to be added to the program in early 2002. Staff is also exploring the addition of metals analysis at routine stream chemistry sites in early 2002. Routine waterfront chemistry was monitored at 16 sites across the Toronto area waterfront in 2001 from May to October. The addition of 3 additional waterfront sites, opposite the mouths of Petticoat, Duffins and Carruthers Creeks, will be explored with our network partners in the spring of 2002. MOE's Tributary Toxics Monitoring (TTM) program monitors the full suite of water chemistry parameters (basic, metals and organics) in selected Lake Ontario tributaries once every three years. From June 2000 - June 2001, monthly composite samples were collected through this program near the mouth of Duffins Creek and the Humber and Don Rivers. The regional monitoring program has proposed an expansion of the existing MOE program in the next survey year (2003) to cover stations in every watershed, and in 2001 the Authority began putting resources aside to support this expanded program. In 2001 only two of the 31 proposed young -of- the -year biomonitoring sites were included in MOE's fall survey (both in Etobicoke Creek as part of another ongoing project). Continued discussions and resource sharing of Authority field staff with MOE in 2002 is expected to result in at least 20 of the 31 core YOU sites being visited this year (2002). MOE continued with their ongoing Sport Fish Contaminant program in 2001. Of the five additional recreational sport fishing sites recommended under the Regional watershed Monitoring Program, two have been monitored. Discussions are currently underway with MOE, including offering Authority field staff to assist with collections if necessary, to ensure the remaining three additional sites are visited in the fall 2002 survey of sport fish. UJr1 lip 3 April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G34 TRCA helped bring together community volunteers in the past year to participate in MOE's Lake Partner Program to track lake nutrient conditions. For the first time volunteers participated in the program at Seneca /Eaton Hall Lake, Palgrave Pond, Claireville Reservoir, Grenadier Pond and Heart Lake. TRCA field centre staff monitored Lake St. George. Other recommended lakes for the program for which volunteers will be sought in early 2002 with the help of the Authority's community watershed councils and task forces include Mary Lake, Gibson Lake and Professor's Lake. Municipal beach monitoring continued throughout the swimming season at all public inland lake beaches as well as Toronto and Durham Region waterfront beaches. A new community based monitoring program was launched in the fall of 2001 to track the visual aesthetic condition of streams and the waterfront in the TRCA watersheds. Community representatives assisted in the design and implementation of the survey. Volunteers visited any stream or waterfront site once in October 2001 and assessed water colour, odour, clarity and the presence of visual debris. Approximately 3000 surveys were sent out in September 2001. 110 surveys were returned to the Authority. Site scores will be determined in early 2002, as well as spatial analysis and mapping to assist in the interpretation of the results. The results will be shared with the watershed councils as they are expected to guide spring clean up activities. In addition, the results will provide quantitative baseline data for the status of the RAP impaired use "degradation of aesthetics ". Flow and Precipitation The monitoring activities undertaken under the flow and precipitation component of the watershed monitoring network provide both direct information about the state /condition of water quantity in the region's streams as well as supportive information to aid in understanding the current biological conditions of aquatic habitat and species. In addition, the amount of water flowing in the region's streams is also intrinsically linked to surface water quality, both because of the known correlation between high flow and high levels of several contaminants it can deliver and the power associated with high flows to scour stream banks and beds resulting in increased suspended sediment and degraded water quality conditions. The activities and monitoring carried out as part of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program are designed to augment the Authority's existing network of flow, precipitation and snow gauging locations throughout the region. The following summarizes the activities carried out in 2001: Stream Flow Equipment purchased for 2 new stream flow gauge sites (gauges will be installed in spring 2002, one on the Markham Branch and one on the Malvern Branch in the Highland Creek Watershed). New equipment was purchased to reactivate an old stream flow gauge site in the Humber River Watershed in Albion Hills CA (equipment to be installed in February 2002) One new stream flow gauge was installed on German Mills Creek, in the Don Watershed (this was part of a cost -share agreement with the Town of Richmond Hill). Equipment consists of a Telog Level Tracker and a submersible Druck Pressure Transducer [,J+1V 9 G35 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 Approximately 15 site assessments were carried out, throughout our jurisdiction to confirm gauge locations Precipitation Addition of six new precipitation gauging stations - locations still to be determined (equipment has been purchased and will be installed this spring - monitoring usually carried out May through October). All equipment consists of a 12 inch tipping bucket rain gauge and a TrendReader Logger Snow Course Addition of 3 new snow measurement sites (G. Ross Lord Dam, Greenwood CA and Milne Reservoir) currently monitoring at these locations 2 times monthly Data Management One of the key elements of the Regional Monitoring Program is the data that is collected on an annual basis. As such, the storage, security and retrieval of the data is extremely important. In 2001, the TRCA contracted a consultant to develop a relational database (TRCA Envirobase) to house all of the various environmental data collected through this and other programs of the Authority. This relational database also has the ability to Zink various data sets that are currently available. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE 2002 field work and data collection will commence in the spring accordingly, and will include additional fish, habitat, and water quality monitoring to be done in Region of Durham (Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek) subject to funding approval. Monitoring work will include: • Benthic Invertebrate sampling at 150 watershed stations and 22 waterfront sites • Fish community and stream habitat will be surveyed at 48 stations (total) in Don, Highland and Petticoat Creek watersheds, and at 22 sites along the waterfront • Detailed fluvial geomorphology surveys will be conducted at 50 new watershed sites • 5 additional water quality (stream sites) will be surveyed in Durham Region • Metals analysis will be added to the 22 (total) water quality sample sites Further updates to the TRCA's relational database will be forthcoming in the next few months as well as staff development and training on its use. A more detailed report outlining the Regional Monitoring Program and a summary of the data collected in 2001 will be prepared by staff over the next two months. This first year report will provide the basis for updating the Authority's marketing information for the program, including display materials, literature, and web page content. Analysis of the data collected in 2001 will be undertaken over the next few months in order to provide usable interpretation for the Authority's watershed report card process and to share with municipal partners. In addition, staff will continue to foster partnerships with community groups and other agencies involved in monitoring activities through the Watershed monitoring network. W h 2lv C April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G36 FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for the 2001 Regional Watershed Monitoring Program was made available from the following partners /sources: City of Toronto $210,000 Region of Peel $200,000 Region of York $200,000 RAP MOU 2001/02 $40,000 Total $650,000 For the 2002 Monitoring Program funding has been requested as follows: City of Toronto $200,000 Region of Peel $200,000 Region of York $200,000 Region of Durham $50,000 RAP MOU $25,000 Total $675,000 Subject to budget approval, funds to support this program will be available in account 124 -01. RES. #G21/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: COLD CREEK CONSERVATION AREA Preparation of Management Plan Preparation of a management plan for the Cold Creek Conservation Area. Madeleine McDowell Alyson Hazlett THAT the staff report on the Cold Creek Conservation Area Management Plan, be received; AND FURTHER THAT Bill Wilson and Susan Swail, representing the Humber Watershed Alliance; Luciano Martin, representing Action to Restore a Clean Humber (ARCH); and Jerry Gorman, representing the Humber Valley Heritage Trail Association, be appointed to the Cold Creek Community Advisory Committee to assist with the development of a management plan to guide future uses of the Cold Creek Conservation Area CARRIED BACKGROUND The Cold Creek Conservation Area is 160 hectares (400 acres) in size. It is primarily forested with some open meadow and has four buildings including the outdoor education centre, barn, classroom /canteen and rifle range building. W r1 21M10 G37 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 The Cold Creek Conservation Area was closed to formal public use in 1990 due to financial constraints resulting from the decision to close the shooting range and the loss of associated revenues as well as other financial pressures. The infrastructure in the area had deteriorated since that time to the point where the buildings were barely salvageable. Some informal public use of the area has continued by hikers, birdwatchers and horseback riders. For many years, the Cold Creek Conservation Area in King Township was a popular recreational destination devoted to the outdoor sportsman. The property is approximately 180 hectares in size consisting of forests, wetlands and open meadow habitats. Programs and facilities included a hunter education centre, archery range, rifle range, trap range and an air strip for remote controlled airplanes. An environmental education field centre also operated on the site. Unfortunately, in 1990, the Conservation Area was closed and no formal public use of the property has occurred there since. Nevertheless, the Area still receives some moderate public use from those who park at the entrance gate and walk in. ,--\ The Conservation Authority receives proposals periodically from individuals and organizations to use the property for various activities. However, without a current management plan for the property, it has been difficult to evaluate some of the proposed uses to ensure they meet the Authority's mandate and do not jeopardize the natural heritage, human heritage, recreation and education values of the property. With this in mind, TRCA has initiated the preparation of a management plan for the Cold Creek Conservation Area. This plan will include an evaluation of the property based on land use planning policies, landscape features, constraints and opportunities. In the end, the plan will facilitate future watershed management activities and identify any areas where additional public uses may be permitted. The management plan will provide a framework for decision making that considers the natural landscape, community interests, and economic factors. The Authority, at its meeting #8/01, held on October 26, 2001, adopted the following resolution which states, in part: "THAT staff establish a community advisory committee, including local residents, community groups, business representatives, agency staff, municipal staff, and area councillors, to assist with the development of a management plan to guide future uses of the Co /d Creek Conservation Area; "THAT appropriate officials be authorized to execute any documents as required to give effect thereto." Since it would be beneficial for the Humber Watershed Alliance to be represented on the Community Advisory Committee, we are extending an invitation to one Alliance member to be appointed to sit on the Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee's mandate will be to assist with the development of a management plan for the Cold Creek Conservation Area. We anticipate that the Advisory Committee will meet eight or ten times by the end of the year. wrfu07 April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G38 The first meeting is tentatively scheduled on Tuesday, April 30, 2002. A short walking tour of the property from 6:00 -7:00 p.m. will be provided to those who are interested. The meeting will start at 7:30 p.m. A Tight dinner will be provided. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • informal public use of the area would continue; • ensure the property is zoned properly for the proposed uses; • continue to work with the local community, King Township staff and area councillors to explore potential uses for the property; • establish a community advisory committee, including local residents, community groups, business representatives, agency staff, municipal staff and area councillors, to assist with the development of a management plan for the Cold Creek Conservation Area. RES. #G22/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: HUMBER WATERSHED STREAM WATCH PROGRAM Planning and implementation of the new Humber Watershed Stream Watch Program. Nancy Stewart Deb Schulte THAT the staff report on the Humber Watershed Stream Watch Program, be received; THAT staff be directed to plan and implement the Humber Watershed Stream Watch Program with assistance from the Humber Watershed Alliance members and other project partners. AND FURTHER THAT Dianne Douglas be appointed to the Stream Watch Advisory Committee, representing the Humber Watershed Alliance, to assist with program planning and implementation CARRIED BACKGROUND In May of 2000, The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, in partnership with the Humber Watershed Alliance, initiated the "Clean the Humber" program with one year funding support from EcoAction, Environment Canada's community funding program. The program was designed to encourage participation from the surrounding community, and use their support to improve habitat and aesthetics throughout the Humber River watershed. The program received overwhelming interest and cooperation from local residents, schools, and community action groups. The project held 39 large clean -up events at key sites within the watershed. In addition to these large events, smaller scale clean -up events were also conducted at various sites with smaller groups of volunteers. These events generated a tremendous amount of volunteer support, and a significant amount of garbage and recyclable materials was removed from various locations throughout the Humber River watershed. G39 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 In response to the overwhelming interest generated by the "Clean the Humber" program during its first year of implementation, and the need for further community stewardship and education regarding garbage problems in the watershed, a follow -up program has been developed. Humber Watershed Stream Watch The "Humber Watershed Stream Watch" program will be initiated in the year 2002 through a collaborative consisting of four organizations: Humber Creek Restoration Group, Humber Watershed Alliance, Action to Restore A Clean Humber, and the Toronto Humber Yacht Club. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES The program will work toward achieving the following objectives: • • • • • Encourage community involvement and support in activities that promote a healthy Humber River watershed. Survey the Humber watershed and produce a map (with the assistance of the TRCA GIS staff) that identifies areas and indicates the levels of debris contained within these areas throughout the watershed. List and contact the potential guardians (schools, community groups, and businesses) for each of the areas identified. Reduce the amount of waste and litter being dumped at priority clean -up stations within each subwatershed. Build excellent community outreach activities to encourage participation and support from multicultural community groups and new Canadians. RATIONALE The "Humber Watershed Stream Watch" program aims at improving the water quality and aesthetic condition of the watershed through debris removal and community education. It will provide information for the Humber Report Card and TRCA's regeneration database and assist with the implementation of the Regional Watershed Monitoring program. The "Humber Watershed Stream Watch" program complements the goals and objectives developed by the Humber Watershed Task Force in their report titled, "Legacy: A Strategy For A Healthy Humber ", addresses the recommendations for action in the Report Card, and supports the Restoration Targets of the Toronto Remedial Action Plan titled, "Clean Water, Clear Choices." FINANCIAL DETAILS The total value of the "Humber Watershed Stream Watch" program is $127,870. The "Humber Watershed Stream Watch" program has confirmed in -kind support from various partners, and has requested funding support from the Ontario Trillium Foundation (approved with certain conditions), Environment Canada's EcoAction program, and TD Canada Trust Friends of the Environment Foundation (approved). April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G40 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Obtain funds and finalize funding arrangements with funding agencies. • Establish a project advisory committee including members from each of the four groups in the collaborative. • Develop a project work plan. • Prepare implementation details. RES. #G23/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: HUMBER WATERSHED COMMUNITY ACTION SITES Planning and implementation of new Community Action Sites to assist in achieving the objectives set out in "Legacy: A Strategy for a Healthy Humber ". Vito Spatafora Alyson Hazlett THAT the staff report on Community Action Sites in the Humber watershed, be received; AND FURTHER THAT members of the Humber Watershed Alliance assist with the planning and implementation of environmental management actions at the Eglinton Flats, Rexdale Park, West Humber Park, Hwy. 427 /Finch Corridor, Woodbridge Expansion Area, and Seneca College Community Action Sites, as part of their priority subcommittee actions and subject to available funding CARRIED BACKGROUND The watershed management plan for the Humber River titled, "Legacy: A Strategy for a Healthy Humber ", used the model of Community Action Sites to demonstrate how partners could work together to improve the health of the watershed. The model helps focus interest and resources on specific areas to achieve results. Three Community Action Sites were profiled in Legacy. Several additional Community Action Sites have been adopted, including Claireville, Boyd North, Palgrave and Bolton. Many smaller, less complex, projects have been completed as well as part of the Humber Watershed 01 2» Trillium Foundation EcoAction Friends of the Environment Foundation In -kind (TRCA and Partners) Human Resources $30,940 $11,200 $30,000 Supplies & Materials $3,000 $3,500 $10,500 $38,730 Total $33,940 $14,700 $10,500 $68,730 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Obtain funds and finalize funding arrangements with funding agencies. • Establish a project advisory committee including members from each of the four groups in the collaborative. • Develop a project work plan. • Prepare implementation details. RES. #G23/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: HUMBER WATERSHED COMMUNITY ACTION SITES Planning and implementation of new Community Action Sites to assist in achieving the objectives set out in "Legacy: A Strategy for a Healthy Humber ". Vito Spatafora Alyson Hazlett THAT the staff report on Community Action Sites in the Humber watershed, be received; AND FURTHER THAT members of the Humber Watershed Alliance assist with the planning and implementation of environmental management actions at the Eglinton Flats, Rexdale Park, West Humber Park, Hwy. 427 /Finch Corridor, Woodbridge Expansion Area, and Seneca College Community Action Sites, as part of their priority subcommittee actions and subject to available funding CARRIED BACKGROUND The watershed management plan for the Humber River titled, "Legacy: A Strategy for a Healthy Humber ", used the model of Community Action Sites to demonstrate how partners could work together to improve the health of the watershed. The model helps focus interest and resources on specific areas to achieve results. Three Community Action Sites were profiled in Legacy. Several additional Community Action Sites have been adopted, including Claireville, Boyd North, Palgrave and Bolton. Many smaller, less complex, projects have been completed as well as part of the Humber Watershed 01 2» G41 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 Alliance's mandate to protect, restore and celebrate the Humber, a Canadian Heritage River, designated by the federal and provincial governments in 1999 because of its outstanding heritage and recreational resources. To date many accomplishments have been achieved as a result of the solid partnerships that have been established at each Community Action Site. A brief summary of some of the primary accomplishments is provided below: • Claireville - City of Brampton - wetland creation, trails, reforestation, community environmental awareness days • Boyd North, City of Vaughan - trails, reforestation, community environmental awareness days • Palgrave, Town of Caledon -water quality improvement, fishway, reforestation, trails and heritage interpretation • Bolton, Town of Caledon - wetland creation, trails, fishway, community environmental awareness days • Caledon East, Town of Caledon • - wetland creation, trails, fish habitat improvements Sun Row, City of Toronto - reforestation, community environmental awareness days, stream channel renaturalization /wetland creation to be completed in 2002. New Community Action Sites continue to be nominated by residents, interest groups and agency staff. Since the Community Action Sites mentioned above are well - established and, in some cases, nearing completion, several additional large sites can be adopted. Recommended new Community Action Sites are as follows: • Eglinton Flats, City of Toronto - wetland enhancement, water quality improvement and public access enhancements to the pond. • Rexdale Park, City of Toronto - riparian revegetation, wetland creation, reptile hibernaculae, and trails • West Humber Park, City of Toronto - reforestation, riparian revegetation, and wetland enhancement • Hwy. 427 /Finch Corridor, City of Toronto - reforestation, riparian revegetation, wetland creation and interpretive signage ) r1 7,--ii April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G42 • Woodbridge Expansion Area, City of Vaughan - reforestation, riparian revegetation, trails, signage and wetland enhancement • Seneca College, King Township - wetland enhancement, bird nesting structures, reforestation, meadow naturalization to discourage geese, trails, signage and water quality monitoring RATIONALE Community Action Sites have proven to be an extremely valuable method for achieving the objectives and actions recommended in "Legacy: A Strategy for a Healthy Humber" and our "Living City" campaign. They profile real locations and focus resources to achieve results. They encourage the involvement of like- minded individuals for a common cause, create friendships and leave a significant lasting legacy for participants. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Establish Community Action Site Steering Committees where they do not exist already; • Finalize action plans for each site; • Raise additional funds and in -kind services, from external sources, to complete the recommended tasks; • Host special events to officially recognize the accomplishments of the Humber Watershed Alliance, sponsors, and other partners. FINANCIAL DETAILS • • The Humber Watershed Management budget provides staff support and small sums of seed money to plan and implement various components; Generous donations of time are provided by Humber Watershed Alliance members, residents, interest groups, agency staff and elected representatives to plan and implement each project. Continue to apply for financial assistance from many external sources including the Great Lakes Sustainability Fund, EcoAction, TD Canada Trust Friends of the Environment, Trillium Foundation, and other sources that become known. MOTION - PROPOSED CALEDON ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CEAC) MOTION TO CALEDON COUNCIL WITH RESPECT TO A BY -LAW REGULATING NON - ESSENTIAL USE OF PESTICIDES Municipalities adopting by -laws regulating the non - essential use of pesticides. THAT Humber Watershed Alliance members endorse the Caledon Environmental Advisory Committee (CEAC) request to Caledon Council for a by -law to better regulate the non- essential uses of pesticides on household lawns and gardens and that a public education program and information materials with regard to alternative methods of pest control be produced to give effect to the by -law; G43 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 AND FURTHER THAT members of the Humber Watershed Alliance bring this issue to the attention of their respective municipal councils with an appeal to prepare a similar by -law to control the non - essential uses of pesticides. THE MOTION WAS NOT CARRIED AMENDMENT RES. #G24/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Luciano Martin Vito Spatafora THAT staff research this matter further, prepare a report to the next Humber Watershed Alliance meeting which will include the Authority's position on this matter; THAT the use of organic materials be considered in the report; AND FURTHER THAT the CFIA be consulted. THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND The Caledon Environmental Advisory Committee has prepared a recommendation to Caledon Council with respect to preparing a by -law to regulate the use of non - essential uses of pesticides on household lawns and gardens. RES. #G25/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: YORK REGION TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Endorsing the comments prepared by the Don Regeneration Council on the York Region Transportation Master Plan - Draft Final Report: January, 2002 Luciano Martin Vito Spatafora THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance endorse the comments prepared by the Don Regeneration Council on the York Region Transportation Master Plan - Draft Final Report: January, 2002. Wr1ti:13 April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G44 AMENDMENT RES. #26/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Luciano Martin Vito Spatafora THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance support the comments prepared by the Don Regeneration Council on the York Region Transportation Master Plan - Draft Final Report: January, 2002; THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance submit its own comments to the York Region Transportation Master Plan with emphasis on the Hwy. 400 widening, Bloomington -King connection, King City By -Pass, and Pine Valley Drive missing link between Langstaff and Rutherford; AND FURTHER THAT a working group, consisting of TRCA staff and Humber Alliance members, be established to review other similar planning /policy documents having an impact on the Humber watershed; THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND The main purpose of the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) is to define a long -term transportation vision and integrated road and transit network plan that will support growth in York Region to the year 2031. In so doing, the Plan will provide a framework upon which all future transportation decisions can be made. The TMP also sets out policies and programs to support the long term vision and plan, and includes an implementation strategy and five year action plan to meet future transportation needs. Implementation of the plan will provide for the safe, efficient, and effective transportation of both people and goods in the Region. The TMP integrates transportation and land use planning and is founded upon the Official Plan goals of sustainable natural environment, economic vitality, and healthy communities. The Plan supports the "centres and corridors" regional structure contained in the Region of York official Plan and provides the basis for an update to transportation plans, objectives and policies of the Official Plan. The TMP also complements the Regional Growth Management Strategy and the current update of the Region's strategic plan - Vision 2026. Recognizing that York Region is part of a much broader Toronto - centred conurbation, this Master Plan study reflects the strategic transportation planning efforts of the Province and the Greater Toronto Services Board and, in particular, the GTSB's Strategic Transportation Plan (June 2000) and the series of background reports on Removing Roadblocks (2000). In addition, it reflects major efforts underway by Durham Region (in the preparation of its own Transportation Master Plan) and the City of Toronto (in the review of its Official Plan and transportation plan). tor! 27`f G45 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 The TMP study process included an extensive consultation program to involve key stakeholders and members of the public. The study followed the "Master Planning Process" as set out in Ontario legislation for Municipal Class Environmental Assessments. This process integrates the planning of municipal infrastructure requirements for existing and future land use, with the principles of Environmental Assessment Planning. The preparation of this TMP thus meets the requirements of both the Ontario Environmental Assessment (EA) Act and the Planning Act. The TMP will be used to support future environmental assessments for specific transportation infrastructure improvements. RES. #G27/02 - HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE WORK PLAN Approval of the work plan for the Humber Watershed Alliance. Moved by: Seconded by: Madeleine McDowell Alyson Hazlett THAT the work plan for the Humber Watershed Alliance, dated April 16, 2002, be approved CARRIED BACKGROUND The Humber Watershed Alliance Terms of Reference requires that the Alliance prepare annual work plans and that these work plans be approved by the Authority. The Humber Watershed Alliance has three subwatershed committees, and three working groups. Each of the subwatershed committees and working groups has reviewed and agreed on a list of priority actions for their term. The information from these priority action lists was consolidated into a work plan for the Humber Watershed Alliance. In designing the priority list of actions, each subcommittee's goal was to undertake actions that will help achieve the objectives of Legacy: A Strategy for a Hea /thy Humber. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • • • Subwatershed, technical, and working group subcommittee members will work collectively to implement the actions listed in the work plan. Funding from external sources will be sought by the relevant committee members for many of their projects. TRCA staff resources will assist the subcommittees and working groups in implementing work plan actions. &,1215 April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G46 RES. #G28/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: BALLYCROY GOLF /HOTEL DEVELOPMENT Staff status report regarding details of the proposed Ballycroy Golf /Hotel development, including independent monitoring of their proposed water use, storage and sewage treatment. Bill Wilson Luciano Martin THAT the staff report on the proposed Ballycroy Golf /Hotel development be received; AND FURTHER THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance supports resolution #D41/02 of the Authority's Watershed Management Advisory Board which recommends that the TRCA support a motion by Council for the Ballycroy Area Rural Conservation Alliance to the OMB Hearing on the matter of OPA #1 of the Township of Adjala - Tosorontio OP, to consolidate the Planning Act Appeals with hearings that may be required for permits and approvals required under the Ontario Water Resources Act for necessary water takings and sewage works and any other hearings that may be required for the proponents undertaking CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Authority meeting held on February 22, 2002, staff reported on the details of the proposed Ballycroy Resort and Golf Course, including independent monitoring of their proposed water use, storage and sewage treatment. The following report has been provided as an update on the proposal. Proposal The proposal is to redesignate the site from "Rural ", "Open Space Recreation" and "Environmental Protection" to site specific "Open Space" and "Environmental Protection ". The purpose of the amendment is to permit a 27 hole golf course and a 250 unit hotel /convention centre on 117 hectares. Site Description The site is located on Lots 1 and 2, Concession 5 in the Township of Adjala - Tosorontio (formerly Adjala), northwest of the intersection of County Road 50 and Highway 9. The current uses of the subject property include a farm, a worked out gravel pit and forested lands. Portions of the site are within the Humber River valley corridor, the Simcoe - Albion Forest Environmental Significant Area (ESA), the locally significant Ballycroy wetland, the Oak Ridges Moraine, and within the County of Simcoe Greenlands System. The natural hazards on the subject site include flooding and erosion (meander belt) associated with the Humber River and steep slopes. TRCA Involvement TRCA staff has had extensive involvement with the Township of Adjala - Tosorontio, County of Simcoe, the applicant, applicant's consulting team, the Region of Peel and the Town of Caledon throughout the Official Plan (OPA) and Zoning By -Law (ZBA) amendment process. Our involvement began in February 2000 when staff was contacted by a consulting team wriz-7 Ito G47 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2102 April 16, 2002 regarding the proposed golf course and TRCA's development criteria. In August 2000, TRCA provided extensive review comments on the circulated OPA/ZBA and supporting "Justification Report" prepared by the consultants. Our review comments were followed by numerous meetings and resubmissions by the consultants. As a result of our review of the additional work by the applicant and discussions with the municipality, TRCA staff indicated no objection to the approval of the OPA/ZBA subject to minor modifications to the OPA. The OPA and ZBA were approved by the municipality on October 30, 2000. The OPA was circulated to the TRCA in February 2001 by the County of Simcoe (upper tier municipality) and staff expressed no objection subject to requested modifications. On March 29, 2001 the County of Simcoe approved the OPA with TRCA's requested modifications. TRCA staff will be involved extensively in the Site Plan approval process within which our detailed concerns will be addressed. In addition to the above, TRCA staff has recently completed a terrestrial evaluation (fauna and flora) for the area as part of the Natural Heritage Strategy. Once the report has been finalized, the findings will be forwarded to the proponent to aid in the preparation of detailed plans for the proposed use. RATIONALE Golf Course Scheme The proponent has committed to the following development criteria: • • • • • To maintain riparian corridor adjacent to the Humber River, protect ESA, wetland and wildlife linkages through the development design. To locate ancillary structures such as tees and greens outside the meander belt, wetland and ESA. To offset the cuttings in the pine plantation the applicant will undertake plantings within buffer areas, and restrict the watercourse crossings to two. These bridges will be a clear span design. Groundwater use will be limited to 25 - 30 Gallons per minute (IGPM) for the conference centre. The golf course irrigation sources will include treated effluent, stormwater runoff and surface water taking from the Humber River. The implementation of design criteria for the golf course, in accordance with Authority requirements, will be completed at the Site Plan / Permit phase and will be supported by the appropriate background documentation. Sediment Control and Monitoring The supporting Environmental Impact Study (EIS) and Addendum prepared by the consulting team commits to a 5 year monitoring plan both during construction and operation of the golf course with yearly reports provided to the TRCA and municipality. In addition, sediment and erosion control measures will be employed during construction to prevent sedimentation of the Humber River and natural feature areas. April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G48 Water Taking and Water Balance Staff feel that the general water management scheme proposed for the Ballycroy Resort Golf Course and Conference Centre will adequately protect the Humber River and other natural features from negative impacts. Our position in this regard is based on the following: 1. The requirement of the applicant to provide additional detailed technical information in support of the site plan application, Permit To Take Water -PTTW and Ont. Reg. 158 applications, where the TRCA will have a high level of involvement in these processes as required by the OPA and other legislation. 2. The applicants commitment to protect the 60% average summer duration flow (secured through the PTTW), in conjunction with the OPA requirement (Section 4.7.5) to limit the total amount of groundwater extraction to 25 - 30 IGM. The applicant also agrees that the ultimate golf course irrigation will be achieved through the use of treated effluent, stormwater run -off and seasonal overflow (flows in excess of the 60% average summer duration flow) only. 3. The applicant's commitment to provide for additional water storage on site if required based on further information which will be gathered as the proposal progresses through the site plan, the PTTW and the Ontario Regulation 158 application processes. 4. The continued involvement of Mr. Bryan Whitehead, consultant for the Township of Adjala - Tosorontio, for peer review hydro geological expertise to ensure that water is continued to be managed properly as this file progresses to detailed design and construction. Planning The OPA amendment redesignates the subject lands "Open Space Recreation" and "Environmental Protection Area ". The amendment also maintains the existing "Rural Residential" designation and refines the existing "Commercial /Industrial" designation. The text of the amendment contains the wording pertaining to groundwater use, protection of groundwater and surface water quality, quantity and recharge capability, and site plan review criteria. Specifically, Section 4.7.5 states that "the use of groundwater for irrigation of the golf course shall be minimized through the use of combination of treated sewage effluent, seasonal overflow from the Humber River and storm water, where possible ". In this regard, the proponent has committed to minimize the use of groundwater for golf course irrigation once the conference center opens and then only to be used for the conference center at 25 - 30 Gallons per minute (IGPM). The amendment also notes that "restoration, enhancement and water management (ground and surface) components of the proposal, as determined through the site plan, be to the satisfaction of the TRCA." The amendment specifies that the site plan application may include, but not be limited to, the following review of a hydrology assessment, detailed plans for septic systems, stormwater management plan and an assessment of the appropriateness of the proposed use(s) in the context of water use and groundwater impacts. boo I-71 G49 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 Summary TRCA has indicated no objection to the OPA and ZBA based on development criteria outlined in background reports and studies. Specifically, the development concept maintains the physical valley feature, commits to offset encroachment into the plantation through the establishment of natural regeneration areas, maintains riparian vegetation, protects ESA and wetland areas, minimizes groundwater taking for the convention center, and uses stormwater, treated effluent and surface water as golf course irrigation sources. The use of surface water from the Humber River will be curtailed to periods when adequate flows are available to replenish the irrigation ponds. The proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. WORK TO BE DONE Approvals Required The OPA and ZBA were approved March 29, 2001 by the County of Simcoe, and have been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). If approved by the OMB the proposal will require Site Plan approval from the municipality, a Permit To Take Water (PTTW) and sewage system approval from MOE, and permit approval by TRCA pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 (fill regulated and watercourse crossings, and water intake structure). Future Involvement Staff will continue working with the proponent, municipal partners and residents to ensure that the proposal occurs in an environmentally sound and safe matter. Efforts will be concentrated on conservation of the Humber River valley corridor and other natural features, the enhancement and protection of ground and surface water quality and quantity. RES. #G29/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: THIESS SERVICES INTERNATIONAL RIVERPRIZE TRCA's submission titled, "The Humber River Watershed. A Living Legacy for the Future of a Healthy City Region', for the Thiess Services International Riverprize. Vito Spatafora Nancy Stewart THAT the staff report on TRCA's submission titled, "The Humber River Watershed: A Living Legacy for the Future of a Healthy City Region, "for the Thiess Services International Riverprize, be received CARRIED BACKGROUND The Thiess Services International River Prize is presented each year as part of the Riverfestival in Australia. The prize is valued at $100,000 (Australian currency) and is open to organizations or individuals who demonstrate outstanding achievement in river management. The International Riverprize will recognize achievements towards river basin sustainability - with actions and outcomes inclusive of ecological, social and economic indicators. This primary criterion of sustainability is to be supported by also addressing the following: April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G50 • • • • demonstrated performance in delivering on- the - ground management actions throughout a river and its basin; demonstrated genuine participation by levels of government, community and industry - and associated accountable planning and policy- making; innovations in river basin management; and demonstrated levels of public accountability and reporting of achievements. Last year, TRCA's submission on Community -Based Watershed Management was selected as one of the four finalists for the award. TRCA was invited to participate in the Riversymposium, August 29 -31, 2001 in Brisbane, Australia to make a presentation and staff attended the Thiess Riverprize Ceremony. RES. #G30/02 - SPRING EVENTS IN THE HUMBER WATERSHED Schedule of spring events within the Humber watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Vito Spatafora Nancy Stewart THAT the following schedule of events be received for information CARRIED BACKGROUND Each year, individuals, groups and agencies are encouraged to host and /or participate in events to celebrate watersheds. Below is a list of spring events and seminars: SPECIAL EVENTS ON THE HUMBER Rexdale Park Community Planting Saturday, April 20, 2002 10 am - 12 noon Granger Greenway Wetland Planting Sunday, April 21, 2002 10 am - 12 noon Palgrave Community Tree Planting Saturday, April 27, 2002 9 am - 2 pm Palgrave Mill Pond, Hwy. #50 Lambton House Hotel & Lower Humber Discovery Walk Sunday, May 5, 2002 1 - 3 pm Meet at the Lambton House at 4066 Old Dundas Street for a guided tour of the newest Discovery Walk on the Lower Humber. wf12 D G51 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 Lake Wilcox Fun Day Sunday, June 23, 2002 9 a.m. - 3 pm The 4th annual Lake Wilcox Fun Day is a celebration of all that the lake has to offer in this growing community in Richmond Hill. There will be music, nature hikes, electro fishing demonstrations, dragon boat races, canoe rides, and other fun activities for the whole family. Canada Day at Albion Hills Conservation Area Monday, July 1, 2002 6 -9pm Join us for family activities including live entertainment, hay rides, pony rides, boat rentals, and a variety of food vendors. The highlight of Caledon Canada Day is always the spectacular fireworks display over Lake Albion, proudly presented by the Caledon Canada Day Committee, TRCA and the Town of Caledon. Granger Greenway Nature Hike Saturday, October 19, 2002 10 a.m. -12 noon C/aireville Conservation Area Tree Planting Sunday, October 20, 2002 9:30 am - 12 noon Listed below are only those events, in the Conservation Seminar Series, occurring within the Humber River watershed. For a complete listing of all events, please see L. Lappano. Conservation Seminar Series Spring Wildflower Tour Albion Hills Conservation Area Wednesday, May 22nd, 7 - 9 pm Mushrooms and Other Fungi Albion Hills Conservation Area Wednesday, September 18th, 6 -8 pm Winter Waterfowl Humber Bay Park West Saturday, December 7th, 1 -3 pm April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G52 RES. #G31/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY STUDY City of Toronto - First Draft Comments Providing input to the City of Toronto on public sector governance options for water and wastewater services currently managed by the Works and Emergency Services Department. Ron Allan Vito Spatafora THAT the first draft comments, prepared by the Don Regeneration Council, Humber Watershed Alliance and Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force, be finalized by staff based on any revisions provided by the Don Regeneration Council, the Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force and the Humber Watershed Alliance, and be submitted to the City of Toronto's Chief Administrative Officer for consideration in their Water and Wastewater Utility Study; AND FURTHER THAT the Humber watershed Councillors, outside the City of Toronto, be circulated the joint comments of the Don Regeneration Council, the Humber Watershed Alliance and the Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force regarding the Water and Wastewater Utility Study in the City of Toronto, for their information CARRIED BACKGROUND In November 2001, Toronto Council directed the City's Chief Administrative Officer to conduct a study on public sector governance options for water and wastewater services currently managed by the Works and Emergency Services Department. A working group, consisting of the CAO's office and various departments including Corporate Services, Finance, Public Health and Works and Emergency Services, are conducting the study. The study will cover governance issues, risk analysis, legal requirements, corporate service agreements, human resource issues, infrastructure funding, and the impacts on the tax base, the water rates, and other City departments and services. It will identify the most appropriate public sector governance model and develop an implementation plan for the recommended model. Options being studied include: Division or department within the City structure -this is the existing situation -water and wastewater services is a division within the Works and Emergency Services Department; - changes to the status quo may include: - restructuring the division as a stand alone department and /or - establishing a separate standing committee of Council responsible for reviewing water and wastewater policies, budget and operational issues. 1,%) 11 L g 2- G53 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2102 April 16, 2002 • Municipal Services Board - establish a special purpose body responsible for water and wastewater services; - Council appoints board members; -The City owns all assets. Publicly -Owned Utility Corporation - create a corporation of which the City of Toronto is the sole shareholder; - Council appoints a Board of Directors to run the corporation; - Council sets corporate objectives and principles; -The corporation operates as a business owned by the City. Members of the Don Regeneration Council, the Humber Watershed Alliance and the Etobicoke - Mimico Task Force met on Thursday, April 11, 2002 to discuss the Water and Wastewater Utility Study. RES. #G32/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: WORKING GROUP COMMITTEE REPORTS The minutes of the meetings for the following working groups are provided for information. Nancy Stewart Deb Schulte THAT the following minutes be received: • Meetings #1/02 and #2/02 of the Communications and Outreach Working Group; Meeting #1/02 of the Report Card Working Group; Joint Meetings #2/02 and #3/02 of the Boyd and East Humber Committee; Meetings #1/02 and #2/02 of Lower Humber /Black Creek Subwatershed Committee; Joint Meeting #1/02 and #2/02 of the West Humber Subwatershed Committee and Claireville Stewardship Committee CARRIED April 16, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 G54 NEW BUSINESS OAK RIDGES /LAKE WILCOX CLEAN UP DAYS V. Spatafora invited all members to the above clean up days scheduled on May 4 and 5 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Meet at 39 King Road. SIGNAGE V. Spatafora was pleased to announce that Richmond Hill Council has approved a proposal for river crossing signage. There are four rivers in Richmond Hill. LAKE WILCOX FUN DAY M. White invited everyone to Lake Wilcox Fun Day on June 23 issuing a challenge for dragon boat races. There will be an Oak Ridges Moraine team and, hopefully, a Humber team. For those interested, please call Michael White directly. MAYOR LORNA JACKSON RES. #G33/02 Moved by: Seconded by: M. McDowell The Humber Watershed Alliance THAT a letter of condolence be sent to the late Lorna Jackson's family and to Vaughan Council on behalf of the Humber Watershed Alliance CARRIED NOBLETON PARADE AND FAIR S. Swail invited all members to the Nobleton Parade and Fair on May 20. I. Craig will be involved in the paddling event and G. Wilkins will be taking part in the parade. HUMBER HERITAGE WALK M. McDowell invited members to the Humber Heritage walk on April 21st at 1 p.m. starting from the Lambton House. For those interested in attending, they are asked to call M. McDowell directly. litY1 10 G55 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #2/02 April 16, 2002 NAPA VALLEY TREE PLANTING D. Schulte invited members to a tree planting on May 4 from 10 a.m. to 12 noon. Location is Hwy. 27 and Rutherford Road. For those interested in attending, they are asked to call D. Schulte directly. PALGRAVE TREE PLANTING N. Stewart invited members to the Palgrave Tree Planting event on April 27 from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. Approximately 1,600 trees will be planted in total. SUSTAINABLE HOUSE TOUR Members are welcome to see Mary and Anthony Ketchum's sustainable house in the Hockley Valley on April 27 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. WESTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY TOUR M.L. Ashbourne invited members to the Weston Historical Society tour on April 28 at 1:30 p.m. The tour will focus on the importance of the Humber River in the establishment of the Town of Weston. For those interested in attending, they are asked to call M.L. Ashbourne directly. DOOR PRIZE As a token of the Authority's appreciation for the members' participation on the Humber Alliance, G. Wilkins advised that a door prize will be drawn at the end of each Alliance meeting. The door prize for this meeting was maple syrup. L. Short was asked to assist with the draw. The winning ticket belonged to Ron Allan. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:20 p.m., April 16, 2002. Brian Denney J. Craig Mather Director, Watershed Management Secretary- Treasurer /L. c. THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MINUTES OF THE HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #3/02 Page G56 July 17, 2002 The Humber Watershed Alliance met in Garriock Hall at Seneca College King Campus, on Wednesday, July 17, 2002. The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. PRESENT Ron Allan Member Mary Louise Ashbourne Member Harry Baker Member Dianne Douglas Member Lois Griffin Chair Suzan Hall Member Alyson Hazlett Member Mark Heaton Member Ron Hingston Member David Hutcheon Member Luciano Martin Member Hugh Mitchell Member Miriam Mittermaier Member Marjorie Mossman Member Joanne Nonnekes Member Carol Ray Member Randall Reid Member Lynda Rogers Member Vito Spatafora Member Nancy Stewart Member Susan Swail Member Anyika Tafari Member Horst Truttenbach Member Jane Underhill Member GUESTS Mary Brett Township of Adjala - Tosorontio Heather Broadbent Bolton Community Action Site Member Donna Cain Cold Creek CA Advisory Committee Allan Crawford City of Toronto, Parks & Recreation 1042110 G57 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #3102 July 17, 2002 Gerry Foley Seneca College King Campus Walter Getman Caledon East Community Action Site Member Richard Hoffmann Trout Unlimited Canada Vera Howlett Cold Creek CA Advisory Committee Dennis James Cold Creek CA Advisory Committee Anne Kong Cold Creek CA Advisory Committee Scott Laver High Park Nature Centre John Milligan Palgrave Community Action Site Chair Mike Peppard Black Creek Project Dominic Peresso Rexdale Park Community Action Site Member Yamile Rijo Cold Creek CA Advisory Committee Stephen Roberts Claireville CA Advisory Committee Member Bryan Smith City of Brampton and Claireville CA Advisory Committee Member Michael Warrian Trout Unlimited Canada STAFF Vince D'Elia Clean the Humber Coordinator Rose Hasner Photographer Lia Lappano Administrative Assistant, Humber Craig Mather Chief Administrative Officer Connie Pinto Water Resource Planner Chandra Sharma Humber Projects Coordinator Gary Wilkins Humber Watershed Specialist RES. #G34/02 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: David Hutcheon Vito Spatafora THAT the Minutes of Meeting #2/02, held on April 16, 2002, be approved CARRIED 10120 July 17, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #3/02 G58 CORRESPONDENCE (a) Letter from the City of Vaughan, dated April 19, 2002 to L. Griffin re: Pine Valley Drive Link Environmental Assessment RES. #G35/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Susan Swail THAT the above -noted correspondence be received CARRIED (b) Letter from the Town of Mono, dated April 9, 2002 to L. Griffin re: Water Source Area Protection RES. #G36/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Harry Baker Vito Spatafora THAT the above -noted correspondence be received CARRIED (c) Letter from the Don Regeneration Council and the Humber Watershed Alliance to the City of Toronto, dated May 9, 2002, re: City of Toronto Water and Wastewater Utility Study RES. #G37/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Luciano Martin THAT the above -noted correspondence be received CARRIED (d) Letter from Madeleine McDowell, dated July 3, 2002, re: Inukshuk proposal RES. #G38/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Randall Reid Luciano Martin THAT the concept of using miniature Inukshuk sculptures in a fundraising program, wherein proceeds would be used to help further our watershed management projects in the Humber watershed, be endorsed; G59 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #3/02 July 17, 2002 AND FURTHER THAT the Lower Humber Subwatershed Committee work out the details regarding implementing this project and report back to the Humber Watershed Alliance at its next meeting on October 15, 2002 CARRIED PRESENTATIONS (a) Black Creek Project Recognition Award to Humber Watershed Alliance Mike Peppard of the Black Creek Project presented Lois Griffin, Chair of the Humber Watershed Alliance, with a certificate of appreciation in recognition of the Alliance's valuable contribution to the Black Creek Project's `Clean the Creek' program and ongoing support in rehabilitating the Black Creek Subwatershed. (b) Main Humber Restoration Project Mike Warrian, Executive Director of Trout Unlimited Canada made a formal request to have a representative from Trout Unlimited sit on the Humber Watershed Alliance. RES. #G39/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Luciano Martin Mark Heaton THAT Trout Unlimited Canada be invited to become a member of the Humber Watershed Alliance; AND FURTHER THAT Richard Hoffman be appointed to the Humber Watershed Alliance representing Trout Unlimited Canada CARRIED (c) Humber Arboretum Centre for Urban Ecology Carol Ray made a presentation on the Centre for Urban Ecology at the Humber Arboretum. The proposal includes a multipurpose room, student workshop, children's nature activity centre, community resource room, and conservatory or greenhouse to accommodate a gray water filtration system. This proposal is in the fundraising stage. For additional information, members are asked to call Carol Ray directly at (416)675 -6622. i,j112kc( July 17, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #3/02 G60 RES. #G40/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: OAK RIDGES MORAINE - REPORT ON INFORMATION SESSION Update on the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan and Act Training Sessions held on June 25, 2002 Vito Spatafora Nancy Stewart THAT the report on the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan Training Session held June 25, 2002, be received CARRIED BACKGROUND On June 25, 2002, provincial staff, in conjunction with the Save the Oak Ridges Moraine Association, hosted a training session to inform individuals and groups on the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan and Act, roles and responsibilities, and the technical criteria in the plan. Lois Griffin attended the meeting on behalf of the Humber Watershed Alliance. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • More technical training sessions are anticipated in the fall to set out criteria and maps for defining natural heritage and hydrologically sensitive features; • A guideline from the Ministry of the Environment is anticipated on how to conduct watershed studies required by the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan; • Updates are expected from municipalities as they amend their Official Plans to be in conformity with the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan; • The Oak Ridges Moraine Coalition will be meeting to discuss the services that Conservation Authorities can provide to help municipalities to be in conformity with the plan and help integrate the recommendations of the Walkerton Inquiry; Conservation Authorities will discuss with municipalities any necessary updates to Memorandums of Understanding regarding the review of environmental studies; Special interest groups consider their role in ensuring Official Plan conformity with the Oak Ridges Moraine Plan and Act and continue to assist with the rehabilitation of the form and function of the moraine, where required. RES. #G41/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: WALKERTON INQUIRY, PHASE II REPORT The release of the report "Part II of the Walkerton Inquiry - May 23, 2002" Suzan Hall Carol Ray Wrl Z') 0 G61 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #3/02 July 17, 2002 THAT the Executive Summary of the Part II Walkerton Inquiry Report, dated May 23, 2002, be received for information CARRIED BACKGROUND The Walkerton Inquiry was established in May 2000 to examine the contamination of the water supply in Walkerton, Ontario by E.Coli bacteria and to look into future safety of the water supply in Ontario. Conservation Ontario is a non - governmental organization that represents the network of 36 Conservation Authorities (CA's) in Ontario. On behalf of the CA's, Conservation Ontario participated in Part II of the Walkerton Inquiry by presenting position papers and submissions to the expert meetings and public hearings. In these briefings Conservation Ontario stressed the importance of: • Source protection (protecting the quality of drinking water supplies); • Managing water resources on a watershed basis; • Additional stable sources of funding for watershed management; • Assisting responsibility for Ontario's water resources to one lead provincial ministry; Members of the Humber Watershed Alliance participated in the preparation and delivery of a presentation on the role of watershed management at the Inquiry's Toronto Town Hall Meeting. The Part II report provides recommendations for ensuring the safety of water supply systems in Ontario. Copies of the full report are available for download from the Commission's website (www.walkertoninquiry.com < http: / /www.walkertoninquiry.com >) Key Recommendations from Part II of the Walkerton Inquiry include: • Watershed -based source protection plans should be required - ideally should form part of a watershed management plan provincial permitting and regulatory decisions must be consistent with source protection plan municipal land use decisions must be consistent with the plan, where significant threats to source protection exist, and have regard to the plan in all other areas • MOE should be the lead agency with oversight responsibility for source protection plans - Watershed Management Branch should be formed within the MOE MOE should also have oversight responsibility for protection of drinking water, under a Drinking Water Branch • CA role should be recognized in coordinating the preparation of source protection plans CA role in local consultation is explicitly noted - CA role in local implementation activities k2rt?AI July 17, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #3/02 G62 decision on whether CAs should be moved to MOE from MNR is up to the provincial government; O'Connor doesn't believe that would be necessary though, in order for CAs to fulfil new responsibility • Call for provincial, comprehensive "source to tap" water policy • Province should ensure adequate funding for completion of source protection plans (and all other drinking water programs) funding should be derived from a combination of sources, including provincial tax base, user pay and polluter pay sources province should develop guidelines to determine what is appropriately charged where • Private well owners are recognized as having responsibility for the security of their own water supplies • Province should provide and disseminate information to raise awareness and make water testing accessible. RES. #G42/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEER NETWORK PROJECT The endorsement of the Environmental Volunteer Network Project Suzan Hall Mary Louise Ashbourne THAT the Environmental Volunteer Network Project be endorsed; THAT Carol Ray be appointed to the Environmental Volunteer Network Project Advisory Committee representing the Humber Watershed Alliance; AND FURTHER THAT appropriate officials be authorized to execute any documents as required to give effect thereto CARRIED BACKGROUND The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and its partner agencies and groups, rely heavily on volunteer support to implement their programs. TRCA benefits from the dedication, knowledge and enthusiasm that volunteers bring to a variety of Authority programs ranging from education to habitat restoration activities. We enjoy volunteer assistance at the Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Kortright Centre, as part of our Environmental Services and Resource Science Sections, as well as on our volunteer watershed task forces, alliance and councils. The need for a strategic volunteer management program has been recognized for many years. It would help to maximize human resource benefits and reduce turnover of volunteers by G63 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #3/02 July 17, 2002 effective placement, training and recognition. In addition, such a program would contribute to meeting the watershed Report Card targets and other TRCA program goals as related to community stewardship and education on conservation issues. The proposed volunteer management program would also recognize environmental volunteerism within the private sector. The TRCA, in collaboration with the Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants (OCASI), has received a two -year grant from the Ontario Trillium Foundation to initiate an Environmental Volunteer Network Project. The proposed Environmental Volunteer Network Project aims to promote environmental volunteerism, capacity building and skill development for long term social and environmental benefits. The overall objectives of this project include: • • • • • to provide a rewarding and challenging community- oriented volunteer experience for all those interested in the goal of promoting sustainable natural systems; to promote new and meaningful opportunities for training, skill development, and access to resources and employment for youth; to promote better understanding of 'volunteerism' and promote environmental management as a way to gain valuable work skills, as well as contribute to the local community; to increase the capacity of the environmental sector to better coordinate and communicate with volunteers from diverse backgrounds; and to cultivate environmental leadership within the new Canadian population to produce increased job opportunities and representation on environmental agency boards and committees. Since the project is corporate in nature, it best resides in the Human Resources Department of the TRCA. Program direction will be provided by an advisory committee, comprised of TRCA staff and partner agency representatives. The advisory committee will be supervised and coordinated, on a daily basis, by Humber watershed staff. Staff is presently working on program details and recruitment of a program coordinator. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • • • • • Set up Advisory Committee; Hire and train a Project Coordinator; Work in consultation with TRCA's Stewardship and Education Supervisors, Regional Watershed Monitoring Coordinator, Watershed Specialists, BCPV staff, Kortright Centre staff, Conservation Area staff, and Resource Science staff such as archaeology, to develop specific tasks; Develop a detailed work plan; Pursue other funding sources to augment the project for a period longer than two years FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for the Environmental Volunteer Network Program (2002 -2004) has been granted from the Ontario Trillium Foundation in the amount of $124,300. OCASI will manage the overall budget. TRCA will manage staff salaries and benefits. The following table provides budget details: wt1 ZM3 July 17, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #3/02 G64 Total project budget Yearsl & 2: $175,400 Trillium Foundation Contribution: $124,300 RES. #G43/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: COLD CREEK CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Update on the development of the Cold Creek Conservation Area Management Plan Suzan Hall Alyson Hazlett THAT the staff report detailing progress on the development of the management plan for the Cold Creek Conservation Area, be received; AND FURTHER THAT the Cold Creek Conservation Area Management Plan be brought back to the Humber Watershed Alliance for endorsement CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Humber Watershed Alliance meeting #2/02, held on April 16, 2002, resolution #G21 /02 was adopted which states: "THAT the staff report on the Cold Creek Conservation Area Management P /an, be received; "AND FURTHER THAT Bill Wilson and Susan Swail, representing the Humber Watershed Alliance; Luciano Martin, representing Action to Restore a Clean Humber (ARCH); and Jerry Gorman, representing the Humber Valley Heritage Trail Association, be appointed to the Cold Creek CommunityAdvisory Committee to assist with the development of a management plan to guide future uses of the Cold Creek Conservation Area." A Terms of Reference has been prepared and approved by the Authority in order to guide the development of the management plan. An advisory committee has been established including residents, interest groups, businesses and elected representatives. The advisory committee will follow the terms of reference to assist TRCA staff with determining the management recommendations for the property. The committee will also provide technical input and assist the TRCA with public consultation regarding the future management of the property. 1,41 Zq if Trillium TRCA (cash) Other (cash) Partner (in -kind) Total Year 1 $66,400 $2,000 $17,500 $85,900 Year 2 $57,900 $8,000 $23,600 $89,500 Total project budget Yearsl & 2: $175,400 Trillium Foundation Contribution: $124,300 RES. #G43/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: COLD CREEK CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Update on the development of the Cold Creek Conservation Area Management Plan Suzan Hall Alyson Hazlett THAT the staff report detailing progress on the development of the management plan for the Cold Creek Conservation Area, be received; AND FURTHER THAT the Cold Creek Conservation Area Management Plan be brought back to the Humber Watershed Alliance for endorsement CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Humber Watershed Alliance meeting #2/02, held on April 16, 2002, resolution #G21 /02 was adopted which states: "THAT the staff report on the Cold Creek Conservation Area Management P /an, be received; "AND FURTHER THAT Bill Wilson and Susan Swail, representing the Humber Watershed Alliance; Luciano Martin, representing Action to Restore a Clean Humber (ARCH); and Jerry Gorman, representing the Humber Valley Heritage Trail Association, be appointed to the Cold Creek CommunityAdvisory Committee to assist with the development of a management plan to guide future uses of the Cold Creek Conservation Area." A Terms of Reference has been prepared and approved by the Authority in order to guide the development of the management plan. An advisory committee has been established including residents, interest groups, businesses and elected representatives. The advisory committee will follow the terms of reference to assist TRCA staff with determining the management recommendations for the property. The committee will also provide technical input and assist the TRCA with public consultation regarding the future management of the property. 1,41 Zq if G65 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #3/02 July 17, 2002 The advisory committee has met three times and one public information session has been held. A draft vision statement and values have been produced. Background information on the property has been provided to members including forestry, fisheries, archaeology, ecology, public use and infrastructure. A management zone concept has been introduced and will be refined when the committee meets again in September. In the meantime, staff will be preparing the management plan background and recommendations for discussion. The balance of the planning schedule is included in the terms of reference. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Confirm management zones, definitions and permitted uses; • Prepare management recommendations; • Host a public information session on the recommendations; • Request internal staff comments; • Revise management plan based on comments; • Obtain final endorsement of the management plan by the advisory committee; • Seek TRCA approval of the management plan in January, 2003. RES. #G44/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: HUMBER WATERSHED BUS TOUR To determine a suitable date to hold a Humber watershed bus tour this Fall. Marjorie Mossman Luciano Martin THAT a Humber watershed bus tour be held on Saturday, September 14, 2002 .. CARRIED BACKGROUND Earlier this year, the members of the Humber Watershed Alliance expressed an interest in TRCA staff hosting a bus tour of the Humber watershed to familiarize themselves with current and past restoration projects located within the watershed. The tour would run from approximately 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. and would highlight such projects as trails, discovery walks, and fishways. Members are encouraged to suggest any project which they would like to see included in the itinerary. SLIDE PRESENTATION BY SUBWATERSHED COMMITTEES AND WORKING GROUPS The Chairs, or their designate, of each of the Alliance's Subwatershed Committees and Working Groups made a slide presentation of work in progress and accomplishments. A hard copy of the presentation will be made available to the members, as requested. July 17, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #3/02 G66 RES. #G45/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: WORKING GROUP COMMITTEE REPORTS The minutes of the meetings for the following working groups are provided for information. Marjorie Mossman Randall Reid THAT the following minutes be received: • Meetings #3/02 and #4/02 of the Communications and Outreach Working Group; Joint Meetings #4/02 and #5/02 of the Boyd and East Humber Committee; Meetings #3/02 and #4/02 of Lower Humber /Black Creek Subwatershed Committee; Joint Meeting #3/02 and #4/02 of the West Humber Subwatershed Committee and Claireville Stewardship Committee CARRIED NEW BUSINESS COINS IN CARTS CAMPAIGN In an effort to keep shopping carts out of our watercourses, Councillor Hall has launched a campaign to encourage large supermarkets to implement the coins in cart system. RES. #G46/02 - COINS IN CART CAMPAIGN Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Luciano Martin THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance support Councillor Hall's coins in cart campaign CARRIED PROCLAMATION OF CANADIAN RIVERS DAY The Minister of Canadian Heritage, Sheila Copps, has declared that the second Sunday of June will be celebrated henceforth as Canadian Rivers Day. Discussions on ways in which the Alliance can celebrate this event will be deferred to each of the working groups. Background information will be made available at that time. G67 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #3102 July 17, 2002 DOOR PRIZE As a token of the Authority's appreciation for the members' participation on the Humber Alliance, G. Wilkins advised that a door prize will be drawn at the end of each Alliance meeting. The door prize for this meeting was a solar powered radio /flashlight. C. Mather was asked to assist with the draw. The winning ticket belonged to Joanne Nonnekes. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:50 p.m., July 17, 2002. Brian Denney J. Craig Mather Director, Watershed Management Secretary- Treasurer /L. c. er.THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MINUTES OF THE HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE #4/02 Page G68 October 22, 2002 The Humber Watershed Alliance met in the South Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Tuesday, October 22, 2002. The Chair called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m. PRESENT Sandy Agnew Member Ron Allan Member Mary Louise Ashbourne Member Beth Cragg Member lain Craig Member Bernie DiVona Member Dianne Douglas Member Yvette Fournier Member Janie Frank Alternate Rob Frank Member Ian Gagatek Member Lois Griffin Chair Suzan Hall Member Alyson Hazlett Member Ron Hingston Member Richard Hoffmann Member Steve Joudrey Alternate Luciano Martin Member Glenn Mason Member Madeleine McDowell Member Joan Miles Alternate Hugh Mitchell Member Arthur Mittermaier Member Miriam Mittermaier Member Marjorie Mossman Member Joanne Nonnekes Member Dick O'Brien Chair, TRCA Rick Palmer Member Carol Ray Member Randall Reid Member Lynda Rogers Member Lynn Short Member Vito Spatafora Member Nancy Stewart Member G69 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 October 22, 2002 Susan Swail Member Anyika Tafari Member Jane Underhill Member Richard Whitehead Member Bill Wilson Member GUESTS Mike DeAngelis City of Vaughan Gerry Foley Seneca College - King Campus George Leja Humber Creek Restoration Group Doug Nicholson Trout Unlimited Bruce Quick City of Toronto Carolyn Scotchmer Evergreen Bryan Smith City of Brampton Veronica Wahl Black Creek Project STAFF Vince D'Elia Clean the Humber Coordinator Rose Hasner Photographer Lia Lappano Administrative Assistant, Humber Chandra Sharma Humber Projects Coordinator Gary Wilkins Humber Watershed Specialist Dean Young Coordinator, Subwatershed Planning INTRODUCTIONS The Chair introduced Doug Nicholson of Trout Unlimited; Mike DeAngelis, Commissioner of Planning from the City of Vaughan; and TRCA Chair Dick O'Brien and welcomed them to the meeting. RES. #G47/02 - MINUTES Moved by: Seconded by: Glenn Mason Richard Hoffmann THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/02, held on July 17, 2002, be approved CARRIED 0 r1 1,Q9 October 22, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 G70 BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES L. Griffin advised on the status of Councillor Hall's coins -in -cart campaign. A letter was sent to Fortinos on behalf of the Humber Watershed Alliance requesting that they adopt the coins -in- cart shopping cart system at their stores in order to reduce the number of shopping carts found in nearby creeks and ravines. A response was received from Fortinos wherein they outline a number of initiatives they plan to implement to address this issue; however, they are not prepared to adopt the coins -in -cart system at this time. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Rick Palmer declared a disclosure of interest with respect to item 6.2 - Pine Valley Drive Update as he is an employee of the consulting firm. CORRESPONDENCE (a) Letter from James Caldwell, City of Toronto, dated August 13, 2002 to L. Griffin re: lnukshuk sculpture at Battery Park RES. #G48/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Madeleine McDowell Richard Hoffmann THAT the above -noted correspondence be received CARRIED (b) Letter from the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, dated September 3, 2002 re: Smart Growth RES. #G49/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Jane Underhill Madeleine McDowell THAT the above -noted correspondence be received CARRIED W X300 G71 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 October 22, 2002 PRESENTATIONS (a) Centreville Creek Integrated Subwatershed Plan Dean Young made a presentation on the Centreville Creek Integrated Watershed Plan, including current land cover, land use, issues and opportunities, planning process, technical study components, and administrative framework. Members were invited to the upcoming Open House scheduled on November 6, 2002 from 5:00 pm to 9:00 pm at the Caledon East Community Centre. Members' comments were as follows: • the study should include an analysis of the two separate water systems (Caledon and Palgrave), road system, and agriculture; add 'elected representatives' to the stakeholders group; focus on livestock and agriculture; consider air quality issues; (b) Pine Valley Drive Update lain Craig attended the Working Group meeting recently on behalf of the Humber Watershed Alliance and he provided an update on the proposal. Briefly, the proposal entails linking the road running along the east side of Boyd Park to Rutherford Road. I. Craig invited all members to a walk of the site on October 30, 2002 at 2:30 p.m. RES. #G50/02 Moved by: Seconded by: lain Craig Luciano Martin WHEREAS the Boyd Conservation Area, in part, is designated as an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest; WHEREAS the Boyd Conservation Area, in part, is designated as an Environmentally Significant Area; WHEREAS the Boyd Conservation Area is a major piece of the publically -owned greenspace system which offers many local and regional educational and recreational opportunities in the City of Vaughan, particularly the eastern portion of the property which is of major environmental significance; THEREFORE, the Humber Watershed Alliance is opposed to the extension of Pine Valley Drive encroaching into the Boyd Conservation Area between Rutherford Road and Langstaff Road in the City of Vaughan; AND FURTHER THAT staff bring a detailed report on the status of the Pine Valley Drive proposal to the next Humber Watershed Alliance meeting on January 21, 2003 CARRIED October 22, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 G72 (c) TRCA as Solec Success Story Winner This item was deferred. RES. #G51/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS - 2003 A schedule of meeting dates is proposed for the Humber Watershed Alliance. Madeleine McDowell Rob Frank THAT the meeting dates for the Humber Watershed Alliance scheduled for 6:30 p.m. on the following dates be approved; AND FURTHER THAT the meetings be held at the Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitors Centre, unless otherwise noted CARRIED DATES #1/03 Tuesday, January 21, 2003 #2/03 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 #3/03 Tuesday, July 15, 2003 #4/03 Tuesday, October 21, 2003 RATIONALE A schedule of meetings is proposed to assist the Alliance. A random sample of municipalities were contacted to avoid choosing meeting dates that may conflict with municipal council meetings within the Humber River Watershed. Tuesday evenings are proposed. Meetings of the entire membership will be held quarterly. TRCA can provide meeting space to the Alliance on a regular basis at the Black Creek Pioneer Village Visitors Centre. This location is central to the watershed and easily accessible. However, the Alliance is encouraged to have meetings at various locations throughout the watershed. Suggestions for other meeting locations are welcome. G73 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 October 22, 2002 RES. #G52/02 - AESTHETICS MONITORING To update the Humber Watershed Alliance on the results of the 2001 visual aesthetics survey and to seek volunteers to participate in further aesthetics monitoring of the Humber River watershed through the Stream and Waterfront Watch Program. Moved by: Seconded by: Madeleine McDowell Alyson Hazlett THAT the staff report on the Aesthetics Monitoring Program be received for information; THAT Alliance members be thanked for their participation in the 2001 Toronto Region aesthetics survey; THAT Humber Watershed Alliance members track the visual aesthetic condition of watercourses in the Humber River watershed by completing at least one visual aesthetics survey on a watercourse or section of the waterfront of their choice during October 1 -31, 2002; AND FURTHER THAT community volunteers be sought to participate in the October 1 -31, 2002 visual aesthetics survey CARRIED BACKGROUND Aesthetics conditions in Toronto Region streams and waterfront are one of the impaired beneficial uses, which contribute to the region's designation as an Area of Concern. To fulfill Remedial Action Plan (RAP) reporting requirements, the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program included `aesthetics' as an indicator and recommended an associated monitoring approach involving an annual community based survey. The first pilot survey of aesthetic conditions for Toronto region watercourses and the waterfront was conducted during the month of October 2001. The watershed councils and community volunteers led the assessment, with technical support from TRCA staff. The exercise attracted media attention, with features in both print media and cable television. Based on a method developed for the Rouge River Area of Concern in Michigan, and input from the Humber Watershed Alliance and other watershed councils, the survey evaluated aesthetic conditions using four key indicators: water colour, water clarity, water odour and the presence of visible debris and litter. Each of the indicators was scored separately (out of 10) and the average of the four indicator scores provided the overall site score. Among the 94 sites surveyed, 57 were ranked as good (score between 7.5 and 10), 26 were ranked as fair (score between 5 and 7.4) and 11 were considered to be poor (score of less than 5). Average watershed scores were highest in Duffins Creek (8.5), followed by Highland Creek (7.9), Humber River (7.4), and finally the Etobicoke Creek and Rouge River watersheds (6.1). However, the sample size in some watersheds was very small ( <10), and there were no surveys returned for Carruthers and Petticoat Creek watersheds, or for the Waterfront. Modifications to the survey form and expansion of the geographical scope of monitoring activities were recommended for future visual aesthetics monitoring in the Toronto Region. The Nil 303 October 22, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 G74 final report from the 2001 survey is available on the TRCA website. Improvements have been made to the survey form and plans are in place to administer a second annual survey in October 2002. The Humber Watershed Alliance and other TRCA watershed councils will again be asked to assist in promoting and participating in the survey. RATIONALE • Continued monitoring of aesthetics in the Humber River will help to better characterize areas previously not monitored and improve confidence in earlier results. • Aesthetics monitoring data will be used in future Humber watershed report cards, assist with evaluating the status of beneficial use impairments of the Toronto and Region RAP, and provide direction for future /clean -up activities. • Community participation in monitoring is expected to help foster community stewardship. • Aesthetics monitoring helps to fulfil objectives of the Regional Watershed Monitoring Program. FINANCIAL DETAILS Staff resources for the aesthetics program data analysis are supported by funding available in account #124 -15. RES. #G53/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: HEALTHY BACKYARDS: PESTICIDE REDUCTION CAMPAIGN To support the Environment Canada EcoAction Community Funding Program proposal for the implementation of a pesticide reduction campaign in pilot areas across the Greater Toronto Area. Luciano Martin Vito Spatafora THAT the members of the Humber Watershed Alliance endorse the Healthy Backyards: Pesticide Reduction Campaign; AND FURTHER THAT a letter of support for the Healthy Backyards: Pesticide Reduction Campaign be sent to Environment Canada's EcoAction Community Funding Program on behalf of the Humber Watershed Alliance. Wr3 °'1 G75 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 October 22, 2002 AMENDMENT RES. #G54/02 Moved by: Luciano Martin Seconded by: Vito Spatafora THAT the members of the Humber Watershed Alliance endorse the Healthy Backyards: Pesticide Reduction Campaign; THAT a letter of support for the Healthy Backyards: Pesticide Reduction Campaign be sent to Environment Canada's EcoAction Community Funding Program on behalf of the Humber Watershed Alliance; AND FURTHER THAT TRCA partner with existing community groups already involved In this issue to make a joint funding application as well as to develop and carry out the program. THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND The watershed management strategy Legacy: A Strategy for a Healthy Humber identifies surface water quality as a main issue in the Humber watershed and addresses this in Objective Nine of Legacy: "Reduce the amount of pesticides, chemical fertilizers, oil, grease, metals, road salts, and other contaminant that enter ground and surface waters. The Don watershed management strategy Forty Steps to a New Don and the Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Watersheds management strategy Greening Our Watersheds reflect similar objectives. To achieve these objectives, the Healthy Backyards: Pesticide Reduction Campaign has been developed. RATIONALE The Healthy Backyard: Pesticide Reduction Campaign focuses on changing people's lawn care practices to using organic methods instead of the traditional chemical applications for pest control. This will result in a reduction in the amount of pesticides being applied to residential lawns, a reduction in the amount of pesticides entering local creeks through the stormsewer system, and an increase in the number of lawns that are converted from chemical to natural maintenance techniques. This campaign is based on the Caledon Countryside Alliance Weedgee Kidz program where a group of students work in select communities offering to weed people's front lawns for free, and providing information to the residents about the benefits of maintaining a pesticide free lawn and how to achieve this. This program has been extremely successful in Caledon, reaching over 200 houses during the summer of 2002. NF 136 -' October 22, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4102 G76 Within the Humber Watershed, it will be implemented in the Woodbridge community. It will also be implemented in four other areas in. the Etobicoke, Mimico, and Don watersheds. Because this campaign is targeted for areas across four TRCA watersheds, the proponent of the project will be the Conservation Foundation. The details of how many students will be hired will be determined once funding from EcoAction is confirmed in May 2003. Funding from the Environment Canada EcoAction Community Funding Program is being sought for a two -year period. Further project details are attached. The submission package will be sent to Environment Canada for the upcoming February 1st 2003 deadline. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding is being requested from the Environment Canada EcoAction Community Funding Program. Matching funding is being secured through Peel Natural Heritage and Toronto RAP. Other partners are currently being approached. Detailed funding information is available in the EcoAction funding package. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Finalize funding partners and collect letters of support for the campaign Submission of the EcoAction funding proposal on February 15t, 2003 Determine the number of students to be hired based on the funding approvals from EcoAction RES. #G55/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: CITY OF VAUGHAN PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN STUDY Update on the commencement of a study to prepare a City of Vaughan Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. Madeleine McDowell Suzan Hall THAT lain Craig of the Humber Watershed Alliance report progress made on the City of Vaughan's Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Study, at the next Humber Watershed Alliance meeting CARRIED BACKGROUND The City of Vaughan recently initiated a study to develop a Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. The study presents a unique opportunity to develop a new city -wide strategy for supporting and encouraging walking and cycling. A key component of the study is to further develop the existing walking and cycling network. The first public meeting on October 2, 2002 was to introduce the goals and objectives of the study, to advise the public on the process that will be undertaken, and to facilitate input and encourage participation in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Study. G77 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 October 22, 2002 The first phase of the study, now underway, includes a pedestrian and cyclist user survey. This will help identify issues that affect pedestrian and cycling activities and establish a profile of pedestrians and cyclists in the City of Vaughan. Also underway is an inventory of existing trail conditions and pedestrian and bikeway facilities. For further information, please visit the project website at www.vaughanhikenbike.com RES. #G56/02 - CENTREVILLE CREEK SUBWATERSHED PLAN Initiation of the Centreville Creek Subwatershed Plan. Moved by: Seconded by: Richard Whitehead Nancy Stewart THAT Humber Watershed Alliance members attend the upcoming public meeting scheduled for November 6, 2002 from 5 -9 p.m. at the Caledon East Community Centre, as well as future workshops and stakeholder focus group meetings during the three phases of the planning process to ensure current issues are identified, and appropriate resource needs and opportunities are recommended. AMENDMENT RES. #57/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Richard Whitehead Nancy Stewart AND FURTHER THAT Carol Ray and Bill Wilson represent the Humber Watershed Alliance at future public meetings and report back on the status of this project. THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND To ensure that planning of future development proceeds in an environmentally sound manner, the Region of Peel and Town of Caledon have initiated the development of a subwatershed plan for the Centreville Creek subwatershed, in partnership with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Centreville Creek is a headwaters tributary of the Humber River that flows from the Niagara Escarpment and Oak Ridges Moraine into the main channel of the Humber River at Albion Hills Conservation Area, located approximately six kilometres northeast of the Village of Caledon East. Centreville Creek subwatershed drains a 4723 hectare (47 km2) portion of land that lies entirely within the municipal boundaries of the Town of Caledon and Region of Peel. This area wn) °7 October 22, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 G78 exhibits a distinct rural character despite being under increasing pressure from expansion of the surrounding Greater Toronto Area. Land use is composed of a mixture of agriculture, rural estate residential, rural villages, major green space areas with natural forest cover, some aggregate and peat extraction, and one urban centre; the community of Caledon East. Subwatershed planning is an integrated, ecosystem -based approach to land use planning using the boundaries of a subwatershed to define the study area. The approach is based on recognition that there are limits to the amount of stress that natural systems are able to accommodate before an ecosystem is degraded or destroyed. It is intended to guide existing resource use and new development within the context of environmental protection, conservation and restoration in order to ensure long -term ecological sustainability of the natural features and functions of the subwatershed. The subwatershed planning process will involve the integration of inter - disciplinary technical studies and computer modelling techniques to establish the current condition of the subwatershed and to predict the response of the natural system to future resource use and management scenarios. Stakeholders will have the opportunity to become involved in the development of the subwatershed plan through Stakeholder Focus Group meetings, workshops, and Public Open House events that will be held during each of the three phases of the planning process. Based on the combined results of technical studies and public input, strategies to manage current and future resource use will be recommended, targets for Best Management Practices will be established, and opportunities for rehabilitation and stewardship will be identified. The overall objective of this study is to develop a subwatershed plan that provides guidance to local, regional, and provincial governments and the TRCA in implementing environmental policies, planning future development, and making land and water use decisions in such a manner that ensures that the long -term health and integrity of the natural system is maintained. The study will also provide direction to non - governmental organizations and private landowners with regard to best management practices and opportunities for environmental stewardship. In particular, the plan will provide subwatershed -based environmental information needed to support; • the guidance of five year Official Plan updates by the Region of Peel and Town of Caledon; • on -going implementation of the environmental policies of the Region of Peel and Town of Caledon; • on -going implementation of the recommendations of the TRCA's Strategy for a Healthy Humber River and Report Card on the Health of the Humber River; • the Region of Peel's application for a new Permit to Take Water from an existing groundwater well and renewals of permits for operating wells in the Caledon East area that provide municipal water supplies to the local area. Nti )19g G79 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 October 22, 2002 RES. #G58/02 - COLD CREEK CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Update on the development of the Cold Creek Conservation Area Management Plan. Moved by: Seconded by: Lynda Rogers Dianne Douglas THAT the staff update on the status of the Cold Creek Conservation Area Management Plan be received; AND FURTHER THAT the Cold Creek Conservation Area Management Plan be brought back to the Humber Watershed Alliance for endorsement CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Humber Watershed Alliance meeting #2/02, held on April 16, 2002, resolution #G21/02 was adopted which states: "THAT the staff report on the Cold Creek Conservation Area Management Plan, be received; "AND FURTHER THAT Bill Wilson and Susan Swail, representing the Humber Watershed Alliance; Luciano Martin, representing Action to Restore a Clean Humber (ARCH); and Jerry Gorman, representing the Humber Valley Heritage Trail Association, be appointed to the Cold Creek Community Advisory Committee to assist with the development of a management plan to guide future uses of the Cold Creek Conservation Area." The Cold Creek Advisory Committee, including residents, interest groups, businesses and elected representatives, has been assisting TRCA with the development of the management plan as per Terms of Reference approved by the Authority. The first Public Information Session was held in June to present the study. A draft vision statement and background reports on terrestrial habitat, forestry, ground and surface water, aquatic habitat, archaeology, and public use and infrastructure have been produced. Based on the background reports and direction from the Advisory Committee, staff has delineated draft management zones for the property and level of acceptable use within each zone. TRCA 's terrestrial natural heritage modelling was applied to determine the management zones within Cold Creek. Information on habitat interior and communities, natural areas and public use areas were mapped and analysed. This information reflects TRCA's interpretation of ecological processes on the property. The following management zone definitions are originally from the Ontario Provincial Parks - Planning and Management Policies, Provincial Parks Branch, 1976. The definitions have been modified slightly by the TRCA staff to better reflect current resource uses at Cold Creek Conservation Area. Specific management recommendations and uses for each zone are currently being prepared. WN361 October 22, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 G80 The proposed management zones for Cold Creek are: Nature Reserve: Existing natural cover supporting Species of Concern or Vegetation Communities of Concern, and interior habitat portions of the "targeted natural system " *. Natural Environment: Existing and targeted natural cover within the targeted natural system but which does not currently meet the criteria of the Nature Reserve Zone. Restoration: Primary Restoration Lands within the Nature Reserve Zone that have been designated for active restoration to achieve the full potential of the "targeted natural system ". Secondary Restoration: Lands within the Natural Environment Zone that have been designated for passive restoration (ecological succession) to achieve the full potential of the "targeted natural system ". Public Use: Areas which have existing or potential for low to moderate or high intensity recreational and educational uses, facilities, or services. *where the natural system is fully functioning at all levels. The patch size and shape are providing maximum habitat interior; surrounding matrix is such as to exert completely natural, positive influences. The whole system of Management Zones in Cold Creek should be seen as dynamic, with opportunities for the different zones to evolve. The ideal from an ecological perspective would be an evolution ultimately toward Nature Reserve zones. However, as the plan reaches maturity and it is considered that the Nature Reserve potential has been adequately fulfilled (this should be a priority), Primary Restoration zones can be steered toward more user friendly management where the goal is to enhance the immediate user experience. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • Review and confirm draft management plan including management zones, management guidelines and recommendations. • Host a public meeting to present management Zones and management recommendations; • Request internal staff comments; • Revise management plan based on comments; • Obtain final endorsement of the management plan by the advisory committee; • Seek TRCA approval of the management plan in January, 2003. • Present Management Plan to municipal and regional councils for endorsement. WM3l0 G81 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 October 22, 2002 RES. #G59/02 - NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ACT - REGULATIONS CONSULTATION Update on the Nutrient Management Act, 2002. Moved by: Seconded by: Vito Spatafora Hugh Mitchell THAT the Humber Watershed Alliance members promote nutrient management best practices; THAT Humber Watershed Alliance members participate in upcoming public consultation meeting, particularly stage three which includes regulations dealing with livestock access to waterways, manure haulage and transfer, and washwater and dead animal disposal. AMENDMENT RES. #G60/02 Moved by: Seconded by: Vito Spatafora Hugh Mitchell AND FURTHER THAT TRCA coordinate their stewardship activities with those offered by the Association of Municipalities of Ontario through their Best Management Practices Centre. THE AMENDMENT WAS CARRIED THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS CARRIED BACKGROUND The Nutrient Management Act received Royal Assent in the Ontario Legislature on June 27, 2002. As part of the Ontario government's Clean Water Strategy, the Act provides for province - wide standards to address the effects of agriculture practices on the environment, especially as they relate to land- applied materials containing nutrients. The Act addresses the issues and risks identified in the Environmental Commissioner's special report of July 2000, "The Protection of Ontario's Groundwater and Intensive Farming ". It aligns with Commissioner O'Connor's Report of the Walkerton Inquiry Part II and builds on the government's Smart Growth Strategy which calls for well - planned and environmentally sensitive development. The legislation represents a comprehensive, clear, province -wide approach that protects water, the environment and the well -being of communities in rural Ontario, while ensuring farmers can invest in and operate their farms with confidence. The need for this approach was confirmed by farmers, municipalities, environmental groups and others during consultations held by the Task Force on Intensive Agricultural Operations in Rural Ontario during early 2000. October 22, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 G82 The government has pledged to move quickly to develop and implement regulations under the Nutrient Management Act. Developing Regulations The government will use the O'Connor report and the results of further stakeholder consultations to develop regulations that incorporate standards and best practices to ensure both the best possible protection for the environment and the continued economic viability of farming in Ontario. Consultations will be held in at least three stages, with each stage involving the posting of draft regulations on the Environmental Bill of Right information registry (http: / /www.ene.gov.on.ca /envision /env reg /er /registry.htm), as well as the Ministry of Agriculture and Food's Ministry of Environment and Energy's web sites (www.ene.gov.on.ca and www.gov.on.ca /omaf). These postings will be followed by public consultation meetings. Stage one, which began on August 20, 2002, includes a draft regulation covering: • the content of nutrient management plans (NMP's), including farm identification and location; a farm map and site plan; details of the types of nutrients used on the farm; field by field information such as soil tests, nutrient allocations, and crop rotations; manure and biosolids applications; and contingency plans to address such things as spills and severe weather; • the categories of agricultural operations that will be required to prepare these NMP's and when. Categories would be based on nutrient units: the number of animals housed or pastured at one time that produce enough manure to fertilize one acre of crops under the most limiting of either nitrogen or phosphorus; • category IV livestock operations would have 300 nutrient units or more, meaning more than 150 dairy cows or 1,800 finishing pigs. This requirement for a nutrient management plan would apply to new or expanding operations in March 2003, and to existing operations in 2004; • category III livestock operations would have 150 to 300 nutrient units, or 75 -150 dairy cows or 900 -1,800 finishing pigs. The requirement for a nutrient management plan would apply to new or expanding operations in March 2003, and to existing operations in 2005; • category II livestock operations would have 30 -150 nutrient units, or 15 -75 dairy cows or 180 -900 finishing pigs. The requirement for a nutrient management plan would apply to new and expanding operations in March 2003, to existing operations that generate liquid manure in 2005, and to other existing operations in 2008; category I livestock operations would have less than 30 nutrient units, or fewer than 15 dairy cows or 180 finishing pigs. This requirement would apply to new or expanding operations in March 2003, and to existing conditions in 2008; • All other agricultural operations, including non - livestock, would be required to submit nutrient management plans in 2008. Locations and times of the public consultation meetings will be posted on the Ministry of Agriculture and Food and Ministry of Environment and Energy internet sites in the near future. wri3(Z G83 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 October 22, 2002 Stage two will include other regulations that address the specifics contained in most municipal Nutrient Management Plan by -laws. These include construction and siting of barns and manure storages; land application; biosecurity; local advisory committees; feedlot operations; the content requirements of nutrient management strategies for municipalities and other non -farm industries that apply nutrients to land; setback distances for applying nutrients around waterways and other sensitive features; restrictions for spreading nutrients on snow - covered or saturated land; MOEE's land application program review; MOEE's strategy for the five -year phase -out of the application of untreated septage. Consultation meetings are expected to begin in October 2002. These regulations are expected to be in force in March 2003. Stage three will include regulations dealing with livestock access to waterways; manure haulage and transfer; and washwater and dead animal disposal. As continuous improvements are made in nutrient management, with advances in technology and best practices, more regulations may be drafted and consultations held. Conservation Ontario has submitted comments on Phase I on behalf of the Conservation Authorities in the province. We expect this to occur as well for Phases 2 and 3 of the public consultation process. RES. #G61/02 - SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT CONSULTATION Update on the proposed Safe Drinking Water Act. Moved by: Seconded by: Richard Hoffmann Luciano Martin THAT the staff report on the proposed Safe Drinking Water Act be received for information CARRIED BACKGROUND At the Humber Watershed Alliance meeting #1/02 held on January 15, 2002, resolution #4/02 was adopted which states: "THAT the Regions of Peel and York and the City of Toronto be congratulated for recognizing the need for water source protection and their allocation of funding to TRCA for monitoring, groundwater management, habitat regeneration, and other watershed management activities; October 22, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 G84 THAT a letter be sent by the Chair of the Humber Watershed Alliance encouraging the municipalities within the Humber watershed and the Province to establish funding mechanisms, allocate identifiable, adequate and permanent budgets for water source protection and consumer awareness programs, and use water rate revenues for the identification and protection of water source areas as well as building and maintaining water infrastructure; AND FURTHER THAT this report be forwarded to municipalities, other TRCA Watershed Councils, Task Forces and Coalitions with a request that they also encourage the Province and municipalities to establish mechanisms to support adequate long term funding for water source protection programs and consumer awareness programs.' Commissioner O'Connor was firm about Ontario's need for legislation that would ensure the safety and sustainability of our drinking water. In one act, 50 of his 93 recommendations from Part II of the Report of the Walkerton Inquiry could be delivered, potentially. This legislation would build on components of the private members bill introduced by MPP Marilyn Churley (Bill 3). The government has consulted with key stakeholders and the public in September on technical details concerning the implementation of the proposed Safe Drinking Water Act. Comments were solicited through both consultations and also the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. The government has announced one of the next steps in its Clean Water Strategy. The Safe Drinking Water Act is to deal with "matters related to the treatment and distribution of drinking water" as recommended ( #67) in Justice O'Connor's Part II report. Recommendation 68 states "the provincial government should amend the Environmental Protection Act to implement the recommendations regarding source protection." At the inquiry, it was suggested to Justice O'Connor that watershed management and source water protection was more than just drinking water and, hence, it could be limiting to include these under a 'Safe Drinking Water Act'. Justice O'Connor recommended that watershed -based source protection plans be dealt with through the EPA. Justice O'Connor's rationale follows: "It makes sense to separate the source protection function from the treatment and distribution function for the purpose of legislation. For this reason, I would take the source protection provisions currently in the Ontario Water Resources Act (OWRA) and put them in the Environmental Protection Act (EPA). I do not see how the OWRA provisions add much to what is already in the EPA. Consequently, it may not be necessary to duplicate all provisions. The EPA should also be amended to bring the watershed -based source protection planning process I recommend into being. This will include provisions that: - enpower the conservation authorities to oversee the creation of draft watershed -based source protection plans; -make watershed -based source protection plans mandatory and require the Watershed Management Branch to develop the plans where a conservation authority is unwilling or unable to do so; - require MOE approval of all watershed -based source protection plans; on 3ly G85 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 October 22, 2002 -set out the legal effect of watershed -based source protection plans; - authorize regulations regarding process, including parties that have a right to be involved in the process; -that a legislative review be undertaken to ensure the effective implementation of the watershed -based source protection plan concept. The goal of this review should be to eliminate inconsistency and ensure that the tools needed to implement the scheme are available." Consultations touched on such things as: licensing and accreditation of laboratories that test drinking water, the establishment of standards advisory committee, certification and training of operators, the requirement of an owner's licence for municipal water systems, a statutory standard of care for municipalities and strengthened compliance and enforcement. These consultations are in addition to the extensive public process Commissioner O'Connor undertook through the Walkerton Inquiry. The government also reconfirmed its commitment to meeting Commissioner O'Connor's recommendations on moving towards full cost pricing of water. As Commissioner O'Connor stated in the Report of the Walkerton Inquiry Part II, "Municipalities need to ensure that their water systems are adequately financed. Over the long term, safety depends on stable and adequate financing to maintain the water system's infrastructure and its operational capacity to supply high - quality water consistently." In addition, the government continues to make significant progress on several other components of its Clean Water Strategy. The government is investing more than half a billion dollars in the next two years on clean, safe drinking water for the people of Ontario. This year, the government will provide $245 million, including investments to help municipalities upgrade their water systems to meet our tough new standards and make improvements to their wastewater systems. The government will deliver on its budget commitment to establish the $50 million Clean Water Legacy Trust and the Clean Water Centre of Excellence in Walkerton to provide access to the best scientific knowledge, research and technology and training in the management and monitoring of our safe drinking water. Other clean water commitments include conducting groundwater studies to support the development of source water plans, and continuing towards completing full implementation of Commissioner O'Connor's recommendations. Additionally, the government plans to consult with key stakeholders on watershed -based planning issues this fall. As well, the government, through SuperBuild, has posted the first four of eight studies on the province's water and wastewater infrastructure. Produced in cooperation between the province, municipalities and third party organizations, these studies provide up -to -date data on the condition, organization, investment levels, governance, and pricing /financing of Ontario's water and wastewater infrastructure. These studies will assist in formulating policy options to support Ontario's goal to have clean, safe, and reliable water and wastewater services. The first four studies are available on the Internet at www.SuperBuild.ca, The remaining studies will be released later this year. UM3If October 22, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 G86 DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE • TRCA, Conservation Ontario and their partners continue to work with municipalities and the Province to implement actions identified in the Clean Water Strategy; particularly related to source area protection watershed plans and consumer awareness programs. RES. #G62/02 - FALL EVENTS IN THE HUMBER WATERSHED Schedule of fall events within the Humber watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Bill Wilson Jane Underhill THAT the following schedule of events be received for Information CARRIED BACKGROUND Each year, individuals, groups and agencies are encouraged to host and /or participate in events to celebrate the Humber watershed. Below is a list of fall events and seminars: 3rd annual Hustle up the Humber Triathlon and Fall Fair Saturday, October 19, 2002 12 noon - 3 pm 4th annual Granger Greenway Hike Saturday, October 19, 2002 10 am - 2:30 pm Rexdale Park Community Planting Sunday, October 20, 2002 10 am - 12 pm 6"' annual Claireville Conservation Area Planting Saturday, October 26, 2002 10 am - 12 noon Community Clean Up Event Saturday, October 26, 2002 9 am - 2 pm Bolton - Sunkist Woods Community Planting Sunday, October 27, 2002 10 am - 12 noon Bolton - Deer Hollow Community Planting Sunday, November 3, 2002 10 am - 12 noon G87 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4102 October 22, 2002 Winter Waterfowl (Conservation Seminar Series) Humber Bay Park West Saturday, December 7th, 1 -3 pm RES. #G63/02 - Moved by: Seconded by: WORKING GROUP COMMITTEE REPORTS The minutes of the meetings for the following working groups are provided for information. Luciano Martin Richard Whitehead THAT the following minutes be received: • • • Meetings #5/02 of the Communications and Outreach Working Group; Joint Meetings #6/02 of the Boyd and East Humber Committee; Meetings #5/02 of Lower Humber /Black Creek Subwatershed Committee; Joint Meeting #5/02 of the West Humber Subwatershed Committee and Claireville Stewardship Committee CARRIED NEW BUSINESS BROWN TROUT IN HUMBER RIVER The Ministry of Natural Resources has advised TRCA that they will be releasing 40,000 brown trout in the upper Humber River at Patterson Sideroad on October 30, 2002. Volunteers are requested. Anyone wishing to assist is asked to contact Mark Heaton at (905)713 -7406. HUMBER PLEDGE The Humber Pledge for this Humber Watershed Alliance has been prepared. Members are asked to sign the pledge reconfirming their commitment to protect, restore and celebrate the Humber watershed. October 22, 2002 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 G88 WET WEATHER FLOW WORKSHOP The City of Toronto is hosting a number of Wet Weather Flow Workshops. The workshop pertaining to the Humber watershed is being held October 22 "d in the North Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, concurrent with the Alliance meeting. Members were encouraged to attend. KING CITY TREE PLANTING EVENT J. Underhill reported that over 200 trees were planted in Patton Park in King City on October 19`h. Special thanks to TRCA staff who helped in making the planting a success. THANK YOU GREEN TORONTO L. Griffin advised that the City of Toronto has extended an invitation to the community groups including the Humber Watershed Alliance to participate in the Thank You Green Toronto event on November 21st between 5 -7 p.m. at City Hall. If anyone is interested in attending and willing to take a display depicting the work of the Alliance, let Lois Griffin know. YORK REGION OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT The Region of York is proposing an official plan amendment to bring the Official Plan into conformity with the requirements of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. The next public session is October 24`h. The final meeting is November 13`h. Members are encouraged to attend. BOYD /EAST HUMBER TRAIL I. Craig advised that the Boyd /East Humber Subcommittee is looking at a trail from Kleinburg to Bolton. A site walk is scheduled for November 5`h at 3:00 p.m. for those interested in attending. Those interested in attending should meet off Nashville Road at Howland Mill Road. BRIAR NINE PARK V. Spatafora reported that the Town of Richmond Hill is initiating a new park - Briar Nine - reflective of the Oak Ridges Moraine. It will be restored and reforested with natural species. w pi 'a G89 HUMBER WATERSHED ALLIANCE MEETING #4/02 October 22, 2002 HUMBER ART PARK C. Ray advised of a successful event held on October 6th at the Humber Arboretum. Graffiti murals were unveiled at the Hwy. 27 bridge together with a "Walk for Health" in collaboration with the Osier Hospital Foundation. DROUGHT CONDITIONS M. McDowell expressed her concern regarding the significant number of trees being lost due to the severe drought we have experienced recently. It was agreed that staff prepare a report on this issue for the next Humber Alliance meeting. Restrictions on watering lawns must also be recognized. DOOR PRIZE As a token of the Authority's appreciation for the members' participation on the Humber Alliance, G. Wilkins advised that a door prize will be drawn at the end of each Alliance meeting. The door prize for this meeting was a solar powered radio /flashlight. D. O'Brien was asked to assist with the draw. The winning ticket belonged to Sandy Agnew. TERMINATION ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 9:05 p.m., October 22, 2002. Brian Denney J. Craig Mather Director, Watershed Management Secretary- Treasurer /L. 4)030